People

Jimi Hendrix Murdered?

My Italian and I recently visited the Handel House Museum in London.  The Handel House Museum is the 18th century house where the famous composer George Frideric Handel lived for 36 years until his death in 1759.  Later, however, the Handel House was home to another musical legend – the great Jimi Hendrix… In 1968 Jimi Hendrix moved into the top floor flat of 23 Brook Street with his English girlfriend Kathy Etchingham (Jimi’s old flat is now the administrative offices for the Handel House Museum).

Jimi Hendrix in London

Jimi Hendrix home in London

Below are two images of Jimi Hendrix at 23 Brook Street:

Jimi Hendrix at 23 Brook Street

At 23 Brook Street with Kathy Etchingham:

Kathy Etchingham and Jimi Hendrix

****

While we were exploring the Handel House Museum I overheard another visitor talking about Jimi Hendrix and the idea that he had been murdered. I’d never heard this before and was skeptical. However, the murder theorist also mentioned an article in the Times of London which did pique my interest.

Below is the piece in the Times of London by Dominic Wells… I don’t know how credible it is, but it is interesting.

Was Jimi Hendrix murdered?

“Michael Jackson’s untimely death will fuel biographies, album rereleases and conspiracy theories for years. But rewind nearly four decades and there’s another death, one that bears many similarities to Jackson’s, about which startling revelations are still coming to light.

Jimi Hendrix was also a black artist who crossed over to a white audience. He did for the guitar what Jackson did for the pop video, combining showmanship — playing the guitar with his teeth, behind his back, then setting it on fire — with a musicianship so peerless that on hearing him Eric Clapton considered packing it in.

And Hendrix, too, was afflicted by a fame that came too fast, too heavy; by the money-lubricated machinery of management; and by the drugs that helped him to cope. But there is one key difference.

James “Tappy” Wright, a former road manager, has come forward with an extraordinary claim about rock’s most gifted guitarist. At first it sounds absurd. But as the 65-year-old granddad lays out his tale while pouring a very un-rock’n’roll cup of tea, you begin to realise that there could be something to it.

In direct contrast to the violence and seeming anarchy of his music, Hendrix was a gentle, peaceful man

Hendrix, according to Wright, did not die accidentally in the early hours of September 18, 1970, from choking on his own vomit after a drugs overdose. Instead he was murdered by a ruthless gang who burst into the London hotel room of his girlfriend, Monika Dannemann, and forced sleeping pills and wine down his throat until he drowned. A horrific end, if true. But there’s more.

Wright says he knows the killers’ leader, in fact worked for him. It was the man whom Hendrix should have been able to trust above all others: his own manager, Mike Jeffery. Is that possible?

“Mike Jeffery was a dangerous man, no doubt about it,” says Wright, with a Whitley Bay “oo” in “no doot aboot it”. “He spent two years in the Army, in the Secret Service [it is known that Jeffery spoke Russian and was stationed in Egypt]. Shooting people was fun, he used to say to me, just like shooting ducks at the fairground. He’d have to creep into people’s tents with fixed bayonets, this was in the Suez days or whatever. The noise was horrible, he said: you could hear the metal scraping against the bones of their ribcage.”

In his memoir, Rock Roadie, published last week, Wright says that Jeffery confessed to the murder over a bottle of bourbon in 1973. The story has spread like wildfire on the internet, but until now no one has had the chance to quiz Wright in person. Why did he wait 36 years to tell the tale?

“I was scared,” he says simply. The man who once bedded 70 groupies in a month is potbellied now, with diabetes and dodgy knees, but Wright never drank or took drugs; his memory of the Sixties seems sharp. “Mike Jeffery was not a man you wanted to cross . . . I was scared of him. The day after he told me, I came in dead nervous, like, in case he’d had second thoughts. It was never mentioned again.”

Jeffery died in a mid-air plane collision a month later. Why did Wright not come forward then? Or, in 1993, why did he not give evidence when Hendrix’s former girlfriend, Kathy Etchingham, asked police to re-investigate his death?

“They never asked,” Wright says. “The other men who helped Mike Jeffery kill Hendrix, they would have still been alive. And I was worried that the fact that I hadn’t come forward in the first place made me a — what do you call it? — an accessory. In the end, it was Rod Weinberg [a music impresario who co-wrote the memoir] who persuaded me I had a duty to come clean.”

Bob Levine, now in his eighties and living in Florida, is one of the few key players still alive. As the merchandising manager he worked closely with Jeffery, but even he had to take him to court to retrieve £30,000 lent to save Jeffery from a Mob enforcer.

Levine has sent Wright a letter. “I’m so glad you honoured the truth,” he wrote, “instead of all that regurgitated shit that comes out.”

The Sixties were Wild West times in the music industry. While the rock stars got high, their managers got rich. Wright’s book is more concerned with his own sexploits with groupies, but when pressed, he will recount how Jeffery got him to fly from New York to France, Germany, London and then back, picking up parcels along the way. “I knew it was money. From shady individuals, yes. Sometimes royalty cheques, but they were all made out to Yameta, the offshore account Mike Jeffery set up in the Bahamas.”

The Animals, whom Mike Jeffery managed before Hendrix, were once the UK’s biggest act after the Beatles. They split up in 1966 with just £500 to their name. Their lead singer, Eric Burdon, described that Bahamas account as a “Bermuda Triangle” for their money. Hendrix found the same.

“Mike Jeffery told them that Yameta would be a tax haven for all their money,” says Wright. “But no one got any of it. Jimi died a pauper. The Animals didn’t have a pot to piss in.”

Jeffery may have been more unscrupulous than most, but in any business that runs on cash, the Mob is never far behind. Tours in the US had to contend with Mafia control of trucking, baggage handling and stadium concessions. Managers had to be tough nuts to protect their clients. Jeffery was a short man, not given to overt violence. Yet in his dark glasses and overcoat he exuded menace. He flaunted his connections with organised crime and the FBI.

But murdering your own star act? Perhaps Jeffery was capable of the deed, but what could the motive possibly be? This is where it gets interesting.

Jeffery had crippling debts. There were huge expenses from building Hendrix’s Electric Lady studio in New York, including a $400,000 loan from Warners; Hendrix’s first manager had won a court case granting him the next album and a share of all profits; he owed $200,000 in back taxes; and he had recently paid £100,000 to buy out Hendrix’s co-manager Chas Chandler (Chandler, reveals Wright for the first time, was livid with Hendrix for bedding his wife).

Yet Hendrix’s contract with Jeffery was coming up for renewal. The two men had clashed over not just money but musical direction, too. In 1967 Jeffery had disastrously booked Hendrix as support to the Monkees; the year after that he tried to dissuade Hendrix from recording a double album (Electric Ladyland); and in 1969 he tried to make Hendrix go back to using white musicians in his band. According to several sources during his final weeks in London, Hendrix was determined to change management.

Jeffery would have been desperate. He couldn’t afford to lose his cash cow. But according to Wright, Jeffery had one last get-out-of-jail-free card. Jeffery had taken out a $2 million insurance policy on Hendrix’s life. That was standard practice for a manager, but right now it meant Hendrix was worth more to Jeffery dead than alive.

It wouldn’t have taken much imagination to come to this conclusion, either. As a young man Jeffery had profited from two mysteriously well-timed fires, one at a nightclub and another at a coffee bar he owned in Newcastle. The insurance payments allowed him to set up management of the Animals and open the Club A-Go- Go for them to play in.

After Hendrix’s death, Jeffery was able to pay off his back taxes, buy out Hendrix’s father’s share in the Electric Lady studios, and buy himself a house in Woodstock. And of course he continued to cash in on his client’s legacy. In 1973 he even sent a virtual Hendrix out on tour — showing a film of Hendrix in concert, with support acts appearing beforehand.

So Jeffery had motive and ability. Had he the opportunity? No one knows where Jeffery was that night. Days later, he was tracked down to Majorca, where he had a nightclub. He expressed surprise, claiming not even to have heard of Hendrix’s death.

As to the sequence of events that led up to Hendrix’s death, accounts are famously conflicting. The authority is Tony Brown, whose exhaustive book The Final Days of Jimi Hendrix, came out in 1997. The ambulancemen and police who found Hendrix are interviewed. All concur that they found the door to the flat open, which suggests a hasty exit. Hendrix was fully clothed, which doesn’t sound as if he deliberately took pills to sleep. And he was “covered in vomit, tons of it over the pillow, black and brown it was”.

The doctor who examined Hendrix discovered copious amounts of wine in Hendrix’s lungs, but strangely little had had time to be absorbed into his bloodstream — a powerful indication of foul play. Dr John Bannister told The Times in 1993 that by the time his body reached the hospital, “Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes.”

The version of events presented by Dannemann had been accepted by biographers as fact for 20 years. It is now universally discredited. A German figure-skater turned drug-taker and fantasist, she was with Hendrix the night he died. She claimed that he fell unconscious when she popped out for cigarettes, that he was alive when the ambulance arrived, that it was their blunders that led to his death. This is denied in every detail by all the authorities involved.

It is known, however, that she argued violently with Hendrix before he died; and it was her sleeping pills that found their way into Hendrix’s system. After his death she became reclusive and litigious. Was she involved in the death? Did Jeffery somehow get her out of the way? Or was it she who gave Hendrix nine of the extra-strength tablets? She committed suicide in 1996, so we will never know.

Wright doesn’t claim to have all the answers — in fact very little of the story pieced together above can be found in Rock Roadie. His ripping yarn of groupies, celebrity encounters and touring devotes just five pages to Hendrix’s death. He knew the man, of course. He was there when Hendrix burnt his guitar at Monterey; he went shopping with him for women’s clothes to brighten up his look. But he’s no historian.

So The Times contacted other experts who might shed some light. Roger Pomphrey made a documentary in 1997 about Hendrix’s Electric Ladyland album. A former musician, he interviewed all the key players still aliveand immersed himself in the Hendrix literature.

“If I thought there wasn’t some credibility to this story I wouldn’t begin to associate with it,” Pomphrey says. He will be moderating a series of public Q&A sessions with Wright at the Edinburgh Festival. “We all know that the whole world loves a conspiracy. What separates Hendrix’s death is that from the word go it was incredibly murky. Monika Dannemann’s story changed by the hour. When I made my documentary there were a couple of people who claimed, offcamera, that Monika was in New York two weeks after Jimi died, and who heard her in close conversation with Mike Jeffery.

“That said, of course I’m expecting a total backlash, people saying why have you waited so long to come out. Having got to know Tappy over the last few months, I suspect he’s an honest man.”

Joe Boyd made one of the first Hendrix documentaries, back in 1973. Asked about Wright’s revelation, he says, categorically, “I think it’s absurd.” He knew Jeffery a bit, having dated his secretary. There was a “sinister aspect” to the man, Boyd says, and he “certainly wasn’t the best manager in the world”, but he was intelligent and good to talk to; Boyd can’t believe murder. But then Boyd hadn’t read up on any of the medical revelations from the Nineties; after hearing the whole tale, he began to wonder if there was something to it.

Next, the Hendrix obsessive Yazid Manou, who befriended Dannemann. Initially, he had assumed that Wright was simply a desperate figure with a book to promote. On more considered reflection, he feels that “all the elements of [Wright’s] story could be true, but it’s difficult to check”. And he put us on to a vital witness.

Alan Douglas was Hendrix’s friend and producer during the Electric Lady sessions, and masterminded posthumous releases for 20-odd years. Numerous biographies state that Douglas was the man Hendrix wanted as his new manager.

“Absolutely not true,” Douglas says. Though in his late seventies, he’s still sharp. “I’m not a manager. We never once talked about it. I thought there wasn’t any problem between me and Mike Jeffery but obviously there was, because I kept hearing from people that Mike was worried I was going to steal Jimi.” Confronted about this later, “Tappy” Wright sticks to his story. “I just heard Mike Jeffery’s side of it, but I know what he said to me. Maybe he heard the wrong thing, maybe there’s more than what Alan Douglas is saying.”

Douglas cannot believe Jeffery had anything to do with the death. But he reveals a fascinating conversation with Jeffery a few days after Hendrix died. “Mike was bent double, his head at waist level, in terrible condition with his back. He was feeling a lot of guilt, and told me he wasn’t in retrospect treating Jimi the way he should, under pressure from all the loans. One thing he said to me I don’t think I’ve told anybody, but it’s something I’ll never forget: ‘Every time I was with a woman I thought I could love, I found she was only with me to get to Jimi’.”

So who do we believe? Who, after all this time, can reconstruct events with any certainty? It does not help Wright that his book is ghostwritten: dialogue does not ring true, and there is the odd detail — an “I Love New York” mug, when the slogan wasn’t invented until 1977, for instance — that Wright will admit was made up for colour. But it would be a bizarre fantasist who would fabricate such an appalling story, about people he was close to, just to sell a book.

This much we do know. The medical evidence is at least consistent with Hendrix having been murdered. Jeffery had ability and opportunity. He behaved oddly after the death. And if we believe, as many have attested, that Hendrix wanted to change management, then he also had motive.

Hendrix’s passing marked the end of the Sixties. His stupid, avoidable death from drugs — along with fellow 27-year-olds Brian Jones, Janis Joplin and Jim Morrison — was long held as an indictment of the age, the ultimate discrediting of the pursuit of personal liberty over social conformity.

But instead, you may now choose to rewrite your paradigm of the Sixties like this: the Flower Generation’s rarest bloom was trampled by a ruthless, moneygrabbing, ex-army businessman who wore shades and took drugs, but never understood what Hendrix’s music was about.

Either way, what Hendrix’s death amply demonstrates, as Michael Jackson’s death will continue to do for the next 40 years, is the public’s boundless fascination with their too-mortal gods, and the music industry’s unerring ability to turn martyrdom into money.”

Advertisements

811 thoughts on “Jimi Hendrix Murdered?

  1. It does sound strange that the wine had not had time to be absorbed into Hendrix’s bloodstream but was found in his lungs. This suggests the wine was ingested very quickly – it’s easy to binge drink, say, lager, but who binge drinks red wine that rapidly? Possibly, it was forced on him. Intriguing.

    • RE-OPEN INVESTIGATION on Hendrix death. Start with BOB Levine. Jealous people exist today in cities in Orange County, CA. Several people feed off Cheryl Sweet, Anne Coyne, Daniel Lauver, Mary R. Delia, Theresa Anastasi and associates jealousy. The bible says; ” Where their is envy and jealousy, their is all sorts of evil,”

  2. Speculations about suicide and murder are too ridiculous to contemplate – most of them are probably concocted in order to dramatise and distract from the awful reality of such a genius dying in this way – but what does matter are Kathy Etchingham’s reflections. “Jimi died because the simple things got complicated. He was born to a father who was an alcoholic and a mother who died and he died because he was in that flat in Notting Hill with a complete stranger who gave him a load of sleeping pills without telling him how strong they were. It’s as simple and as complicated as that.

  3. Have your say! I don’t know if Jimi Hendrix was murdered or not. Was Jimi Hendrix murdered? With Jimi, I hope the legacy will always be the music for this once in a life time artists because he advocated peace.

  4. Jesus. Were you guys just poised and waiting for me to publish this post on Jimi Hendrix? Haha. You all pounced on it as soon as I put it up.

  5. Jimi Hendrix was most likely killed by a CIA/COINTELPRO political assassination operation. If you follow the money, Jeffery kept the money he stole from Jimi in some offshore Bahamian banks that CIA also kept some very sensitive funds in. Read Michael Collins Piper’s book ‘Final Judgment’ to understand the connection between the CIA and mob in those banks and how they were used to channel mob proceeds into CIA black ops bank accounts. CIA had a deal with organized crime that if they helped control communism CIA would look the other way. CIA then took a cut which ended up in those same Bahamian offshore banks that Jeffery kept Hendrix’s stolen money in.

    I openly suspect Michael Jeffery was recruited straight out of MI-5 in order to participate in the British branch of this program. He ripped-off the Animals, before he ever heard of Hendrix, through the same banks. I suspect Jeffery was the go-between for this program and was tapping unsuspecting rock acts as a funding source for this CIA black ops program. That explains why Jeffery had no problem taking those acts over from the mob.

    Jimi was murdered while he was in the process of sending his lawyers to investigate those Bahamian bank accounts. They were literally CIA’s most sensitive bank accounts and were their main funding source for their worst black operations. CIA used offshore accounts in order to prevent having to explain what they did with the money or where they got it from. Those monies could then be used to fund some very wicked anti-communist operations. CIA was not interested in having lawyers snooping around those banks. Jimi was murdered by classic CIA alcoholic waterboarding in combination with barbiturates shortly after he initiated a tracing of his money. The main Bahamian BCCI Bank was shut down a decade later when it was determined it was mostly a dirty money laundry. Wikipedia BCCI Bank if you don’t believe me.

    Jeffery told Tappy Wright “I had to do it, I had no choice”. You bet your ass.

    Interesting that two months after confessing to Wright Jeffery was called to Majorca to help fix an electrical problem at his nightclub. On the flight back to Britain his Iberia Airlines DC-9 collided with another commercial aircraft and crashed. All 68 on board were killed. It is my suggestion that after killing Hendrix by covert means giving Jeffery a heart attack or some other covert death would be too obvious. No one, however, would question a mid-air plane collision.

    While Jeffery was drawn to Majorca French Air Traffic Controllers went on strike. They were then replaced with military controllers less familiar with the operation. It was during this time that Jeffery’s flight crashed. It is my direct suggestion that intel were the only ones capable of creating the nightclub electrical problem pretext, as well as getting the air traffic controllers to strike, and also steering two jets towards each other. If Jeffery died there would be no one to publicly connect him to those CIA banks or investigate his background once it was established the money was unaccountably gone. Perhaps this is why Jeffery confessed?

    Jeffery’s charred and mangled body was identified by a Hendrix road crew member – either Stickells or Barret, I can’t recall. He identified Jeffery through his unique jewelry. And although he never saw the remains themselves they were photographed.

    I’d also check out Monika Dannemann’s background because it is very possible she was used as an intel infiltrator. I suspect the super-strong sleeping tablets that ended up in Hendrix’s reach the night he died were swung in there by a subtle CIA black operation. And, ironically, very possibly one Jimi may have inadvertently funded himself.

    • This is all tin foil hat made up stuff. Buster only can use the words “I suspect” cuz there is no evidence to support any of this.

      Jimi Hendrix was not murdered and Michael Jeffery was not a member of British Intelligence. Jeffery’s highest rank in the Army was private. Another fabricated claim used by conspiracy theorists for their phony murder theory.

      Michael Jeffery never told Tappy Wright that he murdered Hendrix. Tappy Wright lied about this claim for a “hook” to sell his useless Rock Roadie book. Tappy Wright later admitted he lied about his claim.

      The rest of this junk post is pure fairy tales made up by Buster.

      The CIA doesn’t murder people by “classic CIA water boarding” using alcohol and barbiturates. Ridiculous tin foil hat stuff. Buster has no clue what he’s talking about.

      Waterboarding is a method used to simulate drowning in order to get a person to talk giving up important information. Waterboarding is not a method used for murder. Buster should understand what waterboarding is before he posts inaccurate information. This stuff is hilarious.

      • Ok Bob, then show some evidence that Hendrix was murdered. You are making that claim, so show me some documented evidence that proves your claim.

  6. I’d like to add to Tim Haywards that the denial of the screaming evidence for murder in Hendrix’s case is a typical example of people wanting to believe their government doesn’t operate like an evil machiavellian cult and that all the obvious evidence like Monika Dannemann being caught in outrageous lies about that morning, or Michael Jeffery’s visible in plain daylight MI-5/mafia background and motives, or the forensic evidence, all don’t point towards murder. It’s pretty ridiculous to think the classic government psy-ops propaganda that people want to believe something greater must be involved would cover all the normally obvious intrigue involved in Hendrix’s death. That intrigue is easily shown and available in deep detail if one makes even the most simple effort to look into it – which Tim grants himself the privilege of not doing.

    When Jimi died a forensic clock started ticking. That clock froze a 3.9mg blood level of barbiturate in Jimi’s blood. It also froze a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content into place for the autopsy to register. The autopsist, Dr Teare, also found undigested rice remnants in Jimi’s stomach. These three items create a forensic “triangulation” that can’t be fudged or distorted.

    We know Jimi got back to the Samarkand Hotel with Monika shortly after 3am. We also know Eric Burdon admitted Monika Dannemann called him at around 5:30am. If we apply the forensic graph containing this triangulation to the time period between 3am and 5:30am we can show conclusive forensic proof of murder. This is something the British Inquest into Hendrix’s death never bothered to do.

    Doctor Bannister, the attending St Mary Abott’s Resuscitation Room physician, came forward in 1992 to say he had witnessed lungs and stomach full of wine in Hendrix like he had never seen in his medical career and that instead of choking on vomit Jimi Hendrix had died from being drowned in red wine. He estimated the amount of wine he witnessed in Jimi to be “bottles worth”. This is forensically incompatible with the 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content recorded at the autopsy. So much so as to be proof of murder in and of itself. Murder doubters deal with this by attacking Bannister, however the murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed and clothes as well as a scarf around Jimi’s neck and what Bannister estimated to be “a half bottle of wine saturating his hair alone”. Since you can’t vomit out pure wine this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder .

    A 3.9mg percent of blood barbiturate content is a knock-out dose, therefore Jimi was unconscious when he died. A forensic clock starting ticking backwards when Jimi died. This was the minimum time period for him to die with only a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content. That time period is very short, especially when a doctor witnessed “bottles worth” of wine inside Jimi and his lungs. In fact, the period needed is so short that it isn’t long enough to allow Jimi to be conscious while the wine was introduced into him. And that is conclusive scientific forensic evidence of murder. It can’t be any other way. You are battling the clock ticking on the barbiturate dose absorption vs the alcohol absorption. It will show that Jimi would have been passed-out at the point of time on the forensic graph that would have allowed a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content. And people who are passed-out can’t drink “bottles worth” of wine – nor can “bottles worth” of wine only register a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content. The forensics clearly lock-in the fingerprint of a fast death after being drowned in wine.

    Stomach contents usually pass through the stomach in 4-5 hours. Since Jimi was witnessed eating that rice at a party at around midnight that means he died somewhere around 4-4:30am. The forensic evidence locks in that time. If you look at the circumstantial evidence, confession, forensic evidence, and lies used by Monika Dannemann to cover the real time of death you can’t escape the fact all evidence points towards Jimi being waterboarded with wine in combination with barbiturates, a classic intel method of covert murder.

    In my opinion it is rather preposterous to try to deny this with evasions that don’t even bother to examine the otherwise screamingly obvious evidence. The British Government is guilty of incompetence and failure to investigate evidence for murder.

      • Hi do you remember me
        My name is Joyce ..Tony Brown sister could you please contact me
        I have information for you
        Thank you Joyce

      • Joyce: I have been trying to contact you for several years…Your old telephone number is no good…I’ll PM you on Facebook…

      • Hi there
        Sorry not been in touch with you before
        I had a big heart operation last year valves and arteries
        I have found Paul only just a week ago my daughter saw him on face book that’s Tony’s Son
        Carol died 2014 with cancer Tony’s wife..
        So that’s why we haven’t been able to find her
        Can you remember I told you she married a guy name David Biggs
        She did marry him
        I got he’s Facebook account and he denied knowing her
        He’s on Paul’s Facebook friends. People why liar they always get found out in the end
        Any way Merry Christmas to you and a Happy New Year

        All the best
        Joyce xx

    • Jan: I have refined the forensics since then…I mistakenly applied the liver barbiturate level (3.9mg) instead of the correct .7mg blood barbiturate level to my forensic calculations above…Consider it a typo since the argument still stands no differently with the .7mg barbiturate level….7mg would still have caused unconsciousness before death and therefore the 5mg blood alcohol content was impossible with a large amount of wine witnessed in the lungs and stomach…This is slam dunk forensic evidence of homicide…

  7. This is stuff that any first year criminology student or detective would have seen right away. The reason it wasn’t investigated at the time is because Jimi Hendrix’s death was a political assassination. British tabloids did CIA’s COINTELPRO dirty work by announcing Jimi had died from a heroin overdose even though the coroner said there was ZERO trace of heroin in his system or any traces of heroin use on his body. To this day, even with this screaming evidence of Jimi’s murder being so obvious and so brazenly denied by the authorities, Jimi’s death is still announced by those fascist Nazi murderers as being a moral lesson and drug overdose.

    Some people need this interpreted to them. Jimi’s UPI reporter friend Sharon Lawrence heard about mess at Jimi’s death scene and spoke to Monika at the hotel Eric Burdon had her hiding out in the day after Jimi’s death. Monika was mainly interested in discussing her new career as a Hendrix painter, an opportunity Jimi’s death now provided. And this was 24 hours after Jimi died in her flat. Sharon Lawrence said this strange detachment was creepy. She then asked Monika about the wine that was spilled around Jimi at the death scene. Monika’s reaction was to moan, whine, and whimper in response to the question. For those who are slow on the uptake the reason Monika reacted that way to the question is because she was aware Jeffery had waterboarded Jimi to death with wine and was cornered by something she hadn’t expected to be asked.

    Again, for those who need this explained to them slowly, Monika’s response to Lawrence that she “washed ‘sick’ off Jimi’s face with wine” was the quick off-the-cuff excuse she thought-up at the moment and nothing else. Let me frame what is happening in this discussion between Sharon Lawrence and Monika Dannemann on September 19th 1970 in London. Sharon is curious about exactly how Jimi died. Monika is aware Michael Jeffery murdered Hendrix but is trying to lay low and play it off as an accident. Sharon sees all the clues but she doesn’t come to the correct conclusion and ultimately writes in her book ‘Jimi Hendrix Betrayed’ that Jimi may have committed suicide. Sharon wrote the book prior to all this Tappy Wright confession business. She, or anyone else, could have pursued this by asking: “Why then did you say Jimi only had a trickle of vomit on his chin? And that if he only had a small drool of vomit running down his chin then why would you need to wash’ sick’ off Jimi face with wine of all things? Especially when the small flat had warm water and a towel nearby and just as close as any wine would have been?” Nobody ever asked these basic questions until now.

    Again, for those who need this interpreted slowly Monika either committed suicide or was “suicided” right before being forced into court by Etchingham to answer these questions. It’s very obvious to anyone with any common sense why that happened. No one bothered to point-out to Monika that the ambulance men witnessed a Hendrix with a face full of vomit that hadn’t been “washed off”. Besides what person who isn’t retarded reacts to a choking dying person by washing their face with wine instead of trying to revive them by slapping the vomit out of their throat and getting them to breathe? Face it, everything we know tells us Monika and everyone else knew Jimi was dead and that he had been murdered by Jeffery. Devon knew this which is why she was found under the 8th floor window of the Chelsea Hotel 5 months later.

    The so-called “Hendrix Community” has taken a pass on this evidence. They have no credibility. They are basically spineless jellyfish who see it as easier to let Jimi flap in the wind murdered than disrupt their hedonistic sucking-off his music and talent. This is something that hasn’t changed since the day Jimi was murdered. I condemn them.

    What needs to be done here is either a mock trial needs to be filmed and presented showing the real evidence and how it was criminally-avoided by the British Government -or- a movie needs to be made showing the real story. As sinful as Jimi personally was himself, his story is very Christ-like. Christ’s story being the “Story of you and me”. Jimi knew he would be murdered by Jeffery for firing him.

  8. I argued these same points to Ceasar Gleebek on WPFW in November during the annual Jimi Hendrix Tribute.His responses were indictments of Jimi and were overtalking a skill then he was indeed it’s master.Unaware that his interviewers were both African-American men over 50, he asked whether or not we had ever possibly thought that racism could be involved instead of the recent revelations,new toxicology reports from Rufus Crompton,and an article in Classic Rock where Terry Slater reports for the first time anywhere that he and Monika actually witnessed the ambulance arrive from across the street.We all need to stay in touch,It is about to become very interesting…..

  9. Yes Cordell I can’t figure out what Caesar’s trip is. He should understand the implications of what he is doing and how it will reflect on him. Did you know he is coming out with an entire issue of his Univibes magazine dedicated to “debunking the murder nonsense”? I can’t believe he would do that to Jimi. I’ve already made efforts to talk to some people who specialize in taking apart articles or publications that commit such offenses and making sure their authors don’t get away with it. Caesar’s misguided efforts won’t go unopposed. I sent Caesar an e-mail listing the forensic reasons that prove Jimi was murdered. He responded “wait until the issue comes out”. I am going to make sure Caesar regrets doing that.

    If we cut right to the chase here Slater’s admitting he stood with Monika at the payphone destroys Monika’s story. Monika was either murdered or committed suicide because of her desperation to not admit this obvious lie, which was already proven anyway with the witnessings and phone records. Now this is the important part, because Monika’s story is now broken that means the official British cause of death verdict is also broken since it depended directly on Monika’s now disproven story to make its determination. The official verdict is now invalid because it has formally been proven to not be legally sound. All the decisions and judgments on Jimi Hendrix’s death were determined directly by the means of Monika Dannemann’s accounts of that morning. Since Slater’s testimony and the phone records corroborate the evidence that disproves Monika’s account, it means the British Inquest’s official verdict was not legally sound. Scotland Yard committed a crime when it internally reviewed the evidence and claimed it was sound. If you look at the details of what they did they lied and changed the real accounts of the witnesses in order to cover-up their knowing complicity. They covered-up their own knowledge and involvement.

    The murder that the British Government is now attempting to get away with is saying that they reviewed the evidence and came to the same conclusion as the official verdict. You have to be kidding right? But there you have it, you have Scotland Yard, which possesses some of the most sophisticated criminal detection practices in human history not afraid to insult the intelligence of the public by straight-facedly offering an investigation of themselves at their own word without producing any information to show how they did it. This, of course, defies all known definitions of civilized rule of law, and is something they themselves would laugh out of court if anyone else tried it, but there you have it and they are trying to stick with it no matter how much obvious evidence appears.

    What needs to be done here is someone with legal standing needs to sue the British Government for failing to uphold its own written definition of law. They need to press a case that forces the British Government to recognize their original verdict has now been legally proven to have been false. This means the British Government is now legally forced to publicly re-examine the evidence behind Jimi Hendrix’s death and be accountable for the process and its findings, something they’ve conspicuously avoided up to now.

    Cordell, I’d like to get in touch with you somehow. What needs to be done here is a ‘Justice For Jimi’ website where the issue is forced and people can see how provable the evidence is.

  10. It has been said by some that Michael Jeffery could not have been among Jimi’s murderers —if he was murdered—because Michael Jeffrey was in Spain at the time.

    But was Michael Jeffery really in Spain?

    In McDermott & Kramer’s HENDRIX: SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT Bob Levine is quoted with regard to Jeffery’s whereabouts.

    pp. 287-288:

    “Back in New York, the question of Jeffery’s whereabouts remained unanswered. ‘We tried calling all of Jeffery’s contacts – from [his club] Sgt. Pepper’s to the Hotel Victoria in Majorca – trying to reach him,’ remembers Bob Levine. ‘We were getting frustrated because Hendrix’s body was going to be held up in London for two weeks and we wanted Jeffery’s input on the funeral service. A full week after Hendrix’s death, he finally called. Hearing his voice, I immediately asked what his plans were and would he be going to Seattle. ‘What plans?’ he asked. I said, ‘The funeral.’ ‘What funeral?’ he replied. I was exasperated: ‘Jimi’s!’ The phone went quiet for a while and then he hung up. The whole office was staring at me, unable to believe that with all of the coverage on radio, print and television, Jeffery didn’t know that Jimi had died. He called back in five minutes and we talked quietly. He said, ‘Bob, I didn’t know,’ and was asking about what had happened. While I didn’t confront him, I knew he was lying because I had spoken to people who saw him at a party Track Records had staged in London the night before Hendrix died. I knew everybody who had attended, from Douglas’s pair – Stella and Colette– to Devon, as well as friends from Harold Davison’s office. It was impossible for him to have slipped incognito into Spain without hearing about Jimi’s death.”

    Alan Douglas, Stella Benabou Douglas and Colette Mimram are still alive, I believe. Someone should ask them if they remember seeing Michael Jeffery at the party at Track Records on the evening of Sept. 17, 1970.

    And if Michael Jeffery WAS in London then, how could Jim Marron have met & talked to Jeffrey in Spain, as Marron claims (quoted in SETTING RECORD STRAIGHT, 286-287)?

  11. Scott,

    There seems to be very few people interested in this even though it is a nuclear scandal laying right out in the open. Some researchers have interviewed those attending the party, which included many more than just Stella and Collette. It seems Jeffery wasn’t at Kameron’s party that night on the 17th/18th. Jeffery was at another Track Records party on the 13th where Jimi dodged him not wanting to confront him on the issues that led to his firing.

    As for Jim Marron, he spoke to Jeffery on the 18th and Jeffery canceled their dinner date because of Jimi’s death. So when Bob Levine called him a week later and Jeffery pretended not to know Jimi was dead there was something seriously wrong there. Jeffery was making sloppy mistakes due to his guilt over murdering Jimi. And don’t make the mistake of thinking Jimi wasn’t murdered. He most assuredly was, as this evidence and other strong forthcoming evidence proves – not to mention the forensic evidence which proves Jimi was murdered beyond a doubt.

    Bob Levine recently made a total retraction of everything he said, including your quotes above, for Caesar Glebbeek’s publication entitled ‘Until We Meet Again’. Caesar had the nerve to write a long magazine-length work trying to debunk the murder evidence. Levine exposes his guilt by suddenly denying everything he’s said for years, pointing suspicion at Jeffery, with a blanket denial. That’s the typical pattern of someone trying to hide something serious. Bob knew much more than he was letting on to. He made a mistake though. Levine said Jeffery told him during a call to Majorca on the 17th that he would not be available due to a boating outing the next day. This was MI-6 Jeffery making-up a pre-emptive alibi to make sure he was unavailable after the murder. Jeffery was suspiciously unavailable during Jimi’s drug bust and kidnapping the same way.

    In the long-run whether Jeffery was actually at the Samarkand or not doesn’t matter. He arranged the whole thing and probably told Tappy Wright he was there in order to cover for accomplices involved in a much deeper intel plot. Just look at all this openly available evidence and ask yourself why the authorities are so uninterested? It’s because Jimi was assassinated by the United States Government’s Central Intelligence Agency in a COINTELPRO political assassination using Michael Jeffery’s mundane business motives for plausible deniability. Jimi was wacked by the CIA and that’s why no government seems interested in investigating it. CIA kills with barbiturates and alcohol in order to appear as a drug overdose.

    There’s some highly unintelligent Hendrix fans out there on the internet who use Jeffery’s literal location to deny the whole murder, however more sophisticated investigators would see that the evidence is more than there no matter where Jeffery was located. If you look at the alibis there’s not a single person who says exactly where Jeffery was and what he was doing that established the alibi.

  12. Dear Buster,

    Thank you for this long, articulate response. Exactly when did Jimi actually fire Michael Jeffery? I am aware that Jimi had been kidnapped, that it appeared to be connected to Jeffery, that Jimi wanted to go with new management and had been talking with Alan Douglas about this, etc., but I did not know that Jimi had actually taken steps to fire Jeffery. Weren’t they still partners in Electric Lady Studio?

    Buster, I have read other comments of yours about Hendrix on other sites. All articulate and persuasive. Your argument is presented with more persuasiveness than that presented by Alex Constantine in his COVERT WAR ON ROCK, in which the chapter on Jimi Hendrix is filled with lots of factual errors.

    Tomorrow, November 24, 2011, I will be hosting a three-hour radio program “Jump Start” on station KPOO, 89.5 FM (San Francisco). I will be celebrating on air Jimi’s 69th birthday (Sunday, Nov. 27th). Should you receive this in time, and should you be awake then, please listen online at:

    http://www.kpoo.com/hearus.html

    Click on the old-fashioned radio icon to listen on Itunes.
    I would like to write to at length on this subect. You can contact me at:

    dolabella32@gmail.com

  13. Scott,

    Try to get a copy of Monika Dannemann’s book ‘The Inner World Of Jimi Hendrix’. In it she describes how Jimi deliberately sat her down next to the phone at the Cumberland Hotel and had her listen to him calling his New York Lawyer Henry Steingarten instructing him to sever his ties with Michael Jeffery no matter the contractual consequences. If you read Tony Brown’s ‘Jimi Hendrix: The Final Days’ you’ll see there was no doubt Jimi was spending the last week of his life in London preparing to fire Jeffery. Most Hendrix fans dismiss Monika’s witnessing by saying she is a known liar (which she is), however that has nothing to do with her witnessing of the phone call. After all, if you look at Monika’s lies they are made for a rational reason in order to cover something up. There is no rational reason for her to invent the phone call to Steingarten. Are those fans suggesting Monika decided to invent a totally random story about Jimi firing Jeffery? Smart people will realize Steingarten’s associates like Steve Weiss were still alive when Monika told this story. They never made any comment on it. That should tell you all you need to know. The call was real. Being a total crook Jeffery had arranged for Steingarten to be both his and Jimi’s lawyer. Following his duty as Jeffery’s lawyer Steingarten called Jeffery to warn him of Jimi’s action. Jimi fired Jeffery at around 5pm September 17. 11 hours later Jimi was dead. It doesn’t take a Sherlock Holmes to figure out why. The combination of Dr Bannister’s witnessing and the autopsy data shows Jimi was drowned in wine as Tappy Wright claimed. The British Inquest and Scotland Yard never bothered to address this because they knew Jimi was murdered by CIA. Welcome to the satanic fairyland of western governments and their intelligence agencies.

    Read ‘Final Days’ and you’ll understand that Jimi’s hours-long late night discussion with Alan Douglas; call to Kramer in NY to get his studio tapes; visit to Chas Chandler to ask him to produce again; and his general paranoia and stress, witnessed by many, were all evidence of his intention to fire Jeffery. Jeffery murdered him for it and Scotland Yard murdered him again by not investigating it. Michael Jeffery was a cheap two-bit scumbag manager. There’s no way Scotland Yard would cover for him. They would, however, forego a real investigation for their main ally’s Central Intelligence Agency using one of their MI-6 agents to murder a COINTELPRO target.

    • Great analysis Buster, I’m a huge Hendrix fan and for years I believed that he died in the ambulance on the way to the hospital. After researching a little I came to the same conclusion, that my hero was murdered. I was just wondering, since it is a strong possibility Hendrix was unconscious when the wine was poured down his throat, doesn’t that open the possibility that Monica did the pouring? I mean, if she slipped him the sleeping pills, and he was out cold, it wouldn’t take a gang of men to hold him down and pour the wine down his throat. I guess what I’m saying is I think there is a strong possibility that she was in cahoots with Jeffery, and may have actually killed Jimi.

    • You are a liar Buster, trying to sell your phony propaganda. Jimi Hendrix never fired Mike Jeffery on September 17, 1970 cuz he couldn’t due to the way Jeffery structured the contract. You are making up lies and promoting fraudulent events that never happened.

      “While at the hotel, Hendrix made several telephone calls. Dannemann said he phoned his lawyer Henry Steingarten, asking him to find a way out of his contract with his manager Mike Jeffery, and producer Eddie Kramer, for whom Hendrix left a voice message.”

      It says right here, that Hendrix only left a voice message for his lawyer only “looking for a way” to get out of his contract. You are selling fraudulent lies saying “Jimi fired Jeffery”. This is a bullshit claim by you. You lost your phony murder motive since Jeffery was never fired.

  14. I say with dead seriousness that Monika may have been a CIA COINTELPRO covert operator otherwise known in espionage parlance as a “honey trap”. The forensic evidence I’ve developed does not preclude Monika doing it, however there’s reason to believe that Jimi was murdered as Michael Jeffery confessed to Tappy Wright. Most of the dummies on the internet don’t understand how real these covert programs were at the time. However, if you study Monika’s statements she shows a pattern that traumatized psychopaths sometimes show. She speaks of people pushing her out of the room at hospital – but this most likely happened at the Samarkand. She speaks of the ambulance men putting Jimi in a chair and tipping his head back when he tried to breathe – again this probably happened at the Samarkand. No, a good Sherlock would realize if Monika did it she would have waited longer and pretended she was sleeping and woke-up to find Jimi that way. The reason she called out for help to Eric Burdon was because Michael Jeffery was his manager and he would know what to do. I’ve just recently realized the calling for the doctor business is made-up. If Monika was really calling Burdon for the doctor’s phone number then why didn’t she call the doctor? She never called the doctor. Judy Wong said Monika called for the doctor’s number but she lied. She was told to say that. Monika never reached out to get the doctor’s phone number she reached-out to get Burdon because he would know what to do about Michael Jeffery murdering Jimi. I’ve just realized this recently after several years of studying this. This really is a dirty scandal of previously unrealized proportions. I think she was in cahoots with Jeffery but got fooled into waylaying Jimi with pills not knowing what the intention was. Now you see why she couldn’t talk. The key here, James, is Monika’s statement to Caesar Glebbeek in 1975 saying “there was evidence that could not be brought to the police and that the mafia killed Jimi for sure.” Think about what she was trying to say there…

    Stay tuned, you’ll see more on this soon.

    • “No, a good Sherlock would realize if Monika did it she would have waited longer and pretended she was sleeping and woke-up to find Jimi that way.”

      I disagree. I think Monika’s story, which we know is false, was her way of trying to insulate herself from any possible prosecution. In her mind she thought she’d be protecting herself.

      “hey, if I say I was out of the flat to go buy some cigarettes, and came back to find Jimi like this, I couldn’t be the one who did this, I wasn’t there”

      In her mind this was a kind of backup alibi in case the authorities did expect foul play and decided to investigate.

      I think she either was a plant by Jeffery from the beginning in order to have intel on Jimi and what he was doing and thinking, or was coerced by Jeffery at a later date to do his bidding.

      We know there was evidence that she was extremely jealous and possessive of Jimi around other women. It is possible she was just like Jeffery and thought “hey, Jimi’s gonna leave me, I better act now”. I think that her and Jeffery, or her and maybe one or two others who worked for Jeffrey carried out the events of that night.

      I would personally like to have Jeffery exhumed and a dna analysis done to make sure that that was even him who supposedly died in the air crash. Anyway, the whole series of events is rotten from the head down IMHO.

      • If you did your research properly Grassy Knollington you,d know that Jefferys body was not recovered from the crash. As to Busters claim that the rest of us “Internet Dummies” have no idea of the truth I suggest we all bow down to your obviously higher intellect and you go ahead and present your proof to the nearest British Police station where they will have to by law look into any evidence you present. I see your last post was in April and have heard nothingin the media .Maybe the “Dark Forces” have silenced you or you,ve just walked away from your computer to get a life.
        If you have nothing but here say then just go away and let Jimmi rest in peace . If you have any proof present it.
        But please please shut up no mark cos you were,nt there .

    • More conspiracy nonsense here LOL.

      BUSTER says: I say with dead seriousness that Monika may have been a CIA COINTELPRO covert operator otherwise known in espionage parlance as a “honey trap”.

      Buster says: I think she was in cahoots with Jeffery but got fooled into waylaying Jimi with pills not knowing what the intention was.

      Funny how you always contradict your phony conspiracy theories. Here you claim Monika was was a secret covert agent and then you claim she didn’t know what the intention was. Great theory! lol. Just more made up nonsense.

      Buster says: The forensic evidence I’ve developed does not preclude Monika doing it, however there’s reason to believe that Jimi was murdered as Michael Jeffery confessed to Tappy Wright. Most of the dummies on the internet don’t understand how real these covert programs were at the time.

      Your “forensic evidence” is based on phony quotes and made up scenarios. Then Bannister’s claims of wine as you match up the autopsy report lol.

      Michael Jeffery never confessed to “murdering Jimi”. Jeffery was in Spain when Jimi died and Tappy Wright admitted he lied to sell his phony book. Even the worst Hollywood movie wouldn’t accept your fantasy script.

  15. ” I disagree. I think Monika’s story, which we know is false, was her way of trying to insulate herself from any possible prosecution. In her mind she thought she’d be protecting herself. ”

    A shrewd detective would see why that isn’t so. If you look at Monika’s behavior she was trying to keep Jimi, not kill him. A sharp eye will see that Monika had pretty safely gotten away with it by 1975 when she admitted to Caesar Glebbeek on his Dutch radio show that “there was evidence that could not be brought to the police and that the mafia murdered Jimi for sure”. Now if Monika had drowned Jimi why would she expose the possibility of foul play and only stand to bring attention to herself by admitting this? Monika was very cunning, as her actions over the ensuing 25 years showed. Calling Burdon at 5:45am wouldn’t “protect” her, as you say, but would do the opposite. It would be too short a time to explain Jimi overdosing and choking on his vomit. There’s things I can’t explain right now that will come out soon but Monika’s admitting the mafia killed Hendrix wasn’t what you would call concealing the issue. She did that because in 1975 Crawdaddy Magazine had put out an issue claiming Jimi was the target of some kind of death squad. She felt it was about to break so she confessed. What you fail to understand, James, is that the British Government was acting in cooperation with the US Government and would not seek evidence in the death of a “Security Index” listee, and that still holds true today. Monika never had any chance to be caught, which is why her flimsy stories held up so well despite their obvious flaws. Murder by brute drowning in wine is a Newcastle thug/Military Intelligence manner of murder. It isn’t the act of a young German girl groupie fighting to be Jimi’s fiancee.

  16. Craigy’s post doesn’t have a reply button. I’ve read that the French air crash morgue showed Gerry Stickells a photo of a charred and mangled corpse and then handed him a plastic bag of jewelry they said they took from that corpse. Stickells said he immediately recognized Jeffery’s wristwatch and pendant. So either Stickells is lying and is in on it or the French investigators are lying and are in on it. So either way the case is surrounded by incriminating intrigue because once you get to that level of corruption there’s something serious to hide. However I believe Jeffery perished in that crash. (Though it is perfectly in-line with his MI-6 depth that MI-6 would get French Intelligence to cover-up his not being on that flight. But just as equally it is possible the crash was a freak accident)

    I’m glad Craigy identifies himself as an internet dummy by being defensive because he’s a perfect example of what I’m talking about. Anyone could see that even with his shallow excuses there’s still plenty to be curious about. Jeffery seems like a personality who could not stay out of the action. But even if he went into hiding that in itself would show a level of intrigue that would necessitate cooperation by the same shadowy underground intelligence community I’m getting at. It would make Jeffery as deep as the things he’s being accused of. Craigy, typical of his kind, doesn’t seem to notice.

    Another thing Craigy stupidly doesn’t fathom is that Scotland Yard and the British Police have already been approached on this by Kathy Etchingham and her petition. They then did a fake investigation, intimidated witnesses into confusing their statements, and ignored the fact Monika’s story was easily refuted. At the time the detective who interviewed the main witnesses commented that they were all lying. Usually when a British detective finds that all the witnesses to the death of an important figure are lying they then respond by applying a interested investigation. In the case of Jimi Hendrix they did nothing. And when approached with further evidence they sought to deny it and deliberately ignored incriminating facts. Yet Craigy accuses me of not doing adequate research. Scotland Yard lied when it came back and said there was no new evidence. The whole time they had proof that Monika was lying and Dr Bannister had witnessed serious medical evidence. Scotland Yard has never once interviewed Dr Bannister, instead he lost his medical license for billing fraud.

    No sorry, you’ve already seen the proof. If you lack the personal facility to comprehend it is not my fault. Nor is saying “cos you weren’t there” very credible. As anyone could see the statements and forensic evidence were “there” enough to draw credible conclusions. Ones that Scotland Yard has no excuse for ignoring or lying around.

    Not good enough Craigy. Jimi can’t afford your ignorant complacency and indifference.

    Ever wonder why Stickells never elaborates on this?

    • Buster
      Glad to see the dark forces haven,t got to you and you are able to reply , although I notice that you still haven,t produced any evidence any one can take to the Police in this country . Are you a resident of the UK ?
      Have you ever dealt with the authorities in these Islands ?
      Yes their a long way from perfect but were they any worse than any other countries in the late sixties ? I,ll come to that soon but first my reply for its worth.
      Firstly I was going to apologize for the vitriol of my original post but on reflection reading your reply I feel I was correct in the first instance its just the quality of my reply that I apologize for but hey thats musicians for you !!

      My original gripe was with the way people on the inter net (usually young single men ) will pick a situation in life thats a mystery,or unexplained and because nature hates a vacuum they fill it with garbage and hear say conspiracy theory while telling any one who disagrees with them is nieve has a vacuim between their ears . Apart from always being suspicious of people who claim that the rest of the world is stupid and only they know the truth they are also rather stupidly adding to the very thing they protest against by muddying the waters of very serious situations they are commenting on there by helping the very “Dark Forces ” they claim they are protesting against.Publishing rumour and here say as fact just does there work for them with all of this disinformation.
      I imagine that every intelligence agency in the world has the “office boy” logged on to all the internet forums stirring this stuff up. Their laughing at you boy, and your just perpetuating this balloon juice for them while they get on with really running this world.
      Now with regards to the death of Jimi Hendrix I would be here all day answering all the nonsense posted on the net about his tragic passing so lets just go through your reply to me.

      1/ Mike Jefferies has no known grave site as far as I,m aware of, and if there was it would be desecrated by Hendrix fans.There was no proper identification of his body. Fact. So no DNA tests there, though I.m glad to see you don,t perpetuate the false hood that the controllers strike was a set up, takeing the conspiracey to ludicruss degrees.

      We had a Freach Air Traffic Controllers strike every summer in the early seventies during the busy holiday periods with the tragic results every year which is why they dont strike any more, though the still some times work to rule !

      2/ Quote ” Shallow Excuses ” a bit chippy , please explain where it was making excusses, it a very short post and I mentioned no particular points. Why the axe to grind ?

      3/ Claim I “don,t see the obvious ” that Jefferies was a very shady guy, we done Sherlock , gosh I never noticed. The music industry is full of shady characters doesn,t mean they killed their clients. Jefferies MI5 involvement is pure sepculation and any way not proof in its self. Please point out to me what I,m not seeing ?

      4/ Fake investgation ? that I stupidly fail to fathom.
      So youv,e accsess to the names of the Officers involved and there orders from above and their fake investigation notes ?
      Well done ,lets see them so I can see how stupid I,ve been unless your a fantasist as well as insulting and don,t know what your talking about.
      Please show me how this jnvestigation was faked, and I don,t mean random speculation.

      Oh yes and “typical of my kind “………….have we met ,what is my kind ?

      5/ Yes we all know Monika lied, of coures she did , thats plain to see from the way she lied at every turn……… more about her in a bit . As for the ambulance men ,police and medical staff all there statements tied up preatty much exactly years later. In fact one of the young officers was the land lord of a local pub just round the corner from a mate of mine in Aylesbury. He had nothing to hide, not the sort to be involved in any great plot. I mean hey you never know but there it is , no proof see.
      As for Jimis friends (so called) of coarse they lied , they didn,t want to get in trouble for removing narcotics from what was a potential crime scene and respectful midle age ment they wanted to deny that. Any way Jimi had been dead for hours by then, it was all a bit after the facts.

      6/ No new evidence ? Funny I thought they had finally disproved Ms Dannemanns lies. The reason they could not go any furthur, at first ,was because the original and very flawed inquest still stood and with the passage of time and lack of evidence , it would not be easy to hold a new one although I feel in time the original would be declared nul en void. What I believe was about happen was Crown Prosecutions were going to prosecute Ms Dannemann for lyinging at the original Inquest, then the way would have been open to charge her with man slaughter, maybe murder. But proceedure has to be followed evidence gathered , there were plenty of people in this country gunning for Dannemann at the time and private and official forces were closing in.
      And then after the Etchingham libel case, which was the new test of guilt, she kills her self. No theres no evidence she was murdered , maybe she just couldn,t face what was about to happen to her. She had lied so much , and the whole pack of cards had come down , and ugly birds were coming home to roost.

      A quick history lesson as I feel your alot younger than me and may be not from this country.
      The investigation into Jimi Hendrixs passing was obviously flawed and was very much of its time. In fact it was an exact rerun of the death of another rock star death just the year before and was all so very much a sign of the times.Brian Jones death was not investigated properly either and also left today a vacuum that people fill with nonsense and speculation.Today the lowest tramp found died in the street would quite rightly be afforded the respect of a better investigation into their passing.
      As the ambulance men said at the time it was an every day occurance in London at the time and Hendrix wasn,t treated any differently because he was black he was just another young person who had died after ingesting to much of something that had killed him. I am just old enough to remember what a stange place London was in 1969/70 ,awash with very hard drugs and many more drug addicts living on the street.The proceedures at the time were very lacks and steps were taken along with improved forensics in the seventies to make sure sloopy proceedure like the kind mentioned above didnt happen again.
      In the seventies we all believed Dannemanns stock story that Jimi hadn,t been looked after properly by the medical staff and I was shock but not surprised that it was all a pack of lies.
      Not surprised because in the years leading up to that investigation she had rather unwisely uped her profile, and what strange bird she was spouting spearitual rubbish at every oppertunity.
      At the time instead of keeping a low profile like any sane person in her position would have done she was sueing any one and every one who was contradicting her story, and loseing every case.
      Who was giving her legal advice and representing her ? They should be struck off for malpractise and misrepresentation.She was a habitual lier and not a very good one.Not some one you,d pick to cover your tracks in a murder.
      After Dannemannes death the police had no where to go, dead ends , only speculation. Unless of coarse you know better and can point them in the right direction. Yes ? No ? Stories ?

      7/ Dr Bannister was not spoken to because he did not perform the autopsy and had given his statement earlier.Why should what he said have changed. A mid ninties investigation was carried out on all the staff envolved in Jimis case and found to have followed good practise.
      Bar raising Jimi from the dead there was only so much they could do and they followed proceedure.Dr Bannister being struck off in Australia is not relivent to the old case .

      Of course Jimi wanted to get away from his manager , who wouldn,t , and his manager was p****d at that prospect , only natural. doesnt mean he killed him though.Obviously Jimi was hiding out at Dannemanns while being booked in at his own hotel so he went to her hotel of his own free will.There is no prior connection between her and Jefferies so isnt funny how the one girl out of dozens Jimi could have spent the night with was also in the employ of his killer . There is no connection just speculation.

      Monika Dannemann was a seriously ill women who had serious mental health problems.Thats the sort of bold statement I would not usually have made, Im not a mental health worker but you dont need to be a weather man to know its raining. If she had gone to court, which if she had lived she most certainly would have ,I feel her previous evidence would have been made inadmissible and she would plead not guilty on the grounds of diminished responsibility.
      But now Im speculating ,see how easy it is to do, but what Im saying is there were only two people who knew for sure what happened that night at The Samarank(sp?) and their both now dead , with one killing them selfs before they were brought to book.

      Was Jimi killed by his manager ? I dont know , maybe,but theres no evidence

      Was Jimi killed by the CIA ? Maybe , but again theres no evidence.

      Im I complacent ? certainly not ? ?
      Im furious that Jimi was most properly murdered.

      Like most Brits Im proud that Hendrix came to the UK to make his music after being rejected in his own country. Im also ashamed that he wasnt served well by the powers that be when his death needed to be investigated and Jimi at least being given justice in death.
      What I wouldnt do is go on the inter net makeing wild claims about speculation on subjects I know nothing about and then claim them to be proof, thus muddying the already murky waters and actually makeing it even harder to get to what really happened. Im ignorent am I . You who only has insults and heresay and you call that a considered arguement when what I asked for was evidence.

      By the way Im still waiting for your “evidence”. If you live in the UK go to the nearest police station and present it. If you dont live here my e mail is availible on request , send it to me and I,ll present it for you . But I,m talking reality here not some stuff you read when old liers are trying to sell a book and get money for health care.
      Surely you dont believe every thing you read on the internet ?
      If so your as big a fantasist as Monlka Dannemann and likely to get yours self into trouble later in your own life.

      All the best Craig McTaggart

      ps oh and the next time you insult me Buster have the good manners to put your real name not hide behind Jimis Seatle nick name . You do him an injustice. Either shit or get off the pot.

  17. In my experiences in arguing this on the internet I’ve found that the British are viciously in denial that the great Jimi Hendrix was murdered in their country by a member of their Military Intelligence agencies and covered-up by their government. Craigy and his post is a good example. Most people are smart enough to see a person who is more interested in the excuses than the evidence.

    Craigy wrote: ” I’m furious that Jimi was most properly murdered. ”

    As anyone can see, Craigy writes in his own words what he really believes and what he just spent the last many paragraphs beating around the bush over. If anything Craigy’s post serves as a good example of how this matter is viewed in England and the prevailing obfuscating logic and mentality by which it is controlled. It’s a helpful post because I don’t think Craigy realizes he’s giving a perfect example of what I was talking about.

    1) What I posted still holds true. Stickells said he was shown a picture of a charred and mangled corpse and given a plastic bag full of jewelry that he recognized as Jeffery’s. The records of how Jeffery’s body was handled should be investigated.

    I don’t think Craigy has a sound grasp of the evil depth of intel and its practices. Those covert practices are shown in numerous books and Jeffery’ mid-air crash is well within their capabilities and methods. It is possible Jeffery died in a genuine freak mid-air crash, but its convenience to intel is too obvious to at least not be considered or investigated. This is not a matter to be considered from a bar stool. Once again, I don’t think Craigy realizes that he himself is showing the lack of clear information on Jeffery’s death only reinforces the credibility of the theories.

    2) Like your post here. This matter can be handled at much greater depth than you’re doing and that in itself shows why you don’t have a good grasp of the evidence.

    3) There’s tons of evidence to show Jeffery was intel. His friends and own father said so. His military record shows he passed the intel aptitude test during his national service. Russian was not taught to regular recruits. His father said all his mates came home on furlough in their uniforms while Jeffery wore civilian clothes. There’s zero doubt whatsoever Jeffery was intel. The stories he told were based on his true background and his need to express its sensational-ness. Jeffery told intel stories because of his bursting awareness of how incredible their doings were and how much they were able to get away with them without people knowing. It was hard for Jeffery to contain knowing how intriguing it was.

    4) Scotland Yard did not seek the truth during Kathy Etchingham’s 1993 petition. They honored Monika’s proven lies about that morning and made no effort to investigate the evidence that proved them. They also never bothered to interview Dr Bannister and ask him what he witnessed. This is criminal malfeasance and breech of public trust and duty plain and simple. You shouldn’t be questioning me you should be questioning them.

    5) Craigy, I don’t think you understand that by saying “Jimi was dead for hours,” as you do above, that you preclude the need for me to respond to everything before it. Your constable had a sworn duty to bring forth his witnessing if indeed he witnessed Jimi dead as you admit all the attendants did above. Common sense tells you it doesn’t take 5 hours to remove a personal use stash from a small flat. These people were cleaning-up murder evidence.

    6) Again, I don’t think you realize how keen a comparison Brian Jones is considering he was murdered by drowning as his groundskeeper Frank Thorogood admitted on his deathbed. Thank you. You offer a perfect example of how these rock figures who became liabilities were conveniently murdered without any protection from the British government while the establishment trumped-up their drug immorality. In the end all you are really saying is those lax practices helped cover-up Jimi’s murder.

    Monika is a typical patsy who’s eccentricities can be used to defame her credibility as Craigy shows. She actually won her libel cases as far as her accounts of that morning and succeeded in shutting-down any inquiries into the events of that morning. If you don’t see how her lawyers and Scotland Yard assisted her in that you’re blind to the evidence. Monika’s lies were protected by the authorities as their non-interest shows. If you think Scotland Yard had nowhere to go after Monika’s death you have a weak understanding of the evidence. And if you think Scotland Yard will cheerfully and honestly cooperate after what they’ve already done you’re the “fantasist”!

    7) You obviously don’t know what you’re talking about because Dr Bannister was the attending emergency room physician who removed wine that was not available to autopsist Dr Teare 3 days later. His witnessing was critical and Scotland Yard had no right ignoring it. Contrary to their being “no new evidence”, as Scotland Yard said, Dr Bannister’s witnessing was critically important. Dr Bannister had never entered any statement on record about the wine. The rest of the staff were not seriously approached or interviewed – ever. Your entries show a lack of grasp of the critical evidence and skip over important things in a superficial manner. However I totally agree with your last sentence in point # 7.

    You don’t know Monika’s relationship to Jeffery. She shows the pattern of an intel spook being worked-in to Jimi’s surroundings. Even if she was just an innocent groupie she could have been manipulated by Jeffery. Or maybe just straight threatened and intimidated. There’s plenty of evidence for this if you read Monika’s accounts of being threatened in her book. I also feel people exaggerate Monika’s mental state in order to avoid looking at her state of involvement. It is common practice for intel to destroy serious witnesses with mental illness defamation. Meanwhile Monika herself said on Caesar Glebbeek’s own 1975 radio show that “There was evidence that could not be brought to the police and that the mafia killed Jimi for sure.” Why, Craigy, would Scotland Yard be uninterested in such a comment during their “re-investigation”??? If you had a solid grasp of the evidence this event was witnessed by much more than just Jimi and Monika. But, really, Craigy, who would really need to go beyond what Monika said on Caesar’s radio show?

    I’m not worried Craigy. Anyone can see my arguments and evidence are pretty much there and haven’t been scratched by your pointless protests. Typical of brits, peer pressure obviously forces you into that transparent calling of obvious evidence “wild speculation” instead of giving it its due. There’s much more to this than you know. I’m sorry but I have little respect for people who see obvious evidence and their unconscious reaction to their awareness of it is to protest it isn’t proof. As my arguments show, I should not be the one answering the questions because it is indeed the other side that hasn’t provided the adequate “proof”.

    I think we all know Jimi was murdered.

    • My god how bad is your grammer, Ive just read your post and tried to pick the sense out of the nonsence Im just having my tea ( yes very british) and will answer your points tomorrow where regardless of what happened that night you’ve contradicted your self many times over.
      But before I pick the bones from your fantasy let me repeat your view point is biased and anti Brit which in its self is no argument at all.
      I dont even really need to look to closely at what youv’e said , all though I will in time but I will repeat what I said before and wait again for a proper reply.

      Of course James Marshall Hendrix was murdered you numb head , and if youv;e got evidence that any one other than M\s Dannemann was envolved I and alot of people here in the UK would like to hear it.
      The case is still open, if any one tells you otherwise then with freash evidence it HAS TO BE BY LAW reopened.

      Now my name is Craig McTaggart and I live here in the UK , Hatfield Hertfordshire and if I or any other person approached my local or any other Police Station in the UK with a complaint about the Jimi Hendrix murder , or any other unsolved case they would have to by UK law look into any evidence presented to them and put forward any outstanding evidence regarding the case.
      Now your argument is that over here we are all corrupt and nothing will be done .
      I notice that dispite asking where you are from you refuse to say weather you live in the UK or not and yet still make sweaping statments about how we do do things here.
      Believe me theres very much a serious blood letting going on here
      between the media and the powers thar be. MPs have been put in prison ,
      Police charged with corruption,news papers closed down.
      There has never been a better time to take evidence to a indepentent journalist here in the UK with a story of wrong doing .
      And if your still convinced that wer’e all totaly corrupt here in the UK our worsoning relationship with our European neighbers leaves open every chance of you taking evidence to a foriegn news paper or court, because the powers that be would like nothing better than to give this country a good moral kicking .
      So yes go ahead , as I said ,shit or get off the pot.

      Of course Jimi was murdered so I,ll tell you what I,ll do I,m gonna go in the loft, get down all the various books relating to this , ring the various office to see who are the officers that this “cold” case is now with and then you give me or them the names and evidence of the peoples who murdered James Hendrix.
      Its the 25 th Jan to day , lets wait till Monday 28 th to see what you got other than hear say , rumour and fantasy .

      • I think most smart people can see the internal conflict in what Craig writes. He said he would come back and reply but never did. If you read what Craig writes he seems to be expressing a challenge to my claims and openly calls them “fantasy” but then turns around and admits even he thinks Jimi was murdered. I think Craig is confused and doesn’t even know what point he is making himself. If you subtract the Fallstaffian buffoonery Craig enters and just get to the heart of the matter, yes, Jimi was murdered, as Craig admits, and it was the way I spelled out in the posts Craig challenges but then comes around and agrees with. The worst part of all this is Craig is a prime example of the British and how they’ve dealt with this since it happened, despite his protests.

      • If you read my posts correctly I quite clearly state that I think Jimi was mudered by his so called “girlfriend ” and was badly served by the police at the time.
        My point to you from the start was have you any evidence to the contrary you can present to the Cold Case Dept at New Scotland Yard London and yet all youv’e done since is say nothing real only insults. A difference of opinion with clear arguement I can take but the arguement of insults means nothing.

        Didnt you read a single thing I said because youv’e not attempted to answer a single question ?. Unlike JImis music or back story you are saying nothing.

        PLease show our posts to family,friends, and mentors then move on because youv’e still said nothing other than your racist views on the British.
        Jimi loved this country and I made a point of stating my name and address ,while you insult, then hide and more to the point say nothing.

        This is not any thing to do about James Marshell Hendrix and more to do with you .

        Now Ive said repeatedly say some thing that could be considered evidence in court or go away.

        Craig McTaggart Hertfordshire UK

  18. Eric Burden also had a motive to help Mike Jeffrey kill Jimi, not to mention the strength.
    With Jimi dead Burden’s failing career with the animals(managed by Jeffrey),his financial security could be helped by extra revenues from Jimi’s insurance policy, most likely promised by Jeffrey if he(Burden) helped restrain jimi.
    He(Burden) admitted to being with Monika earlier the fatal day and was jamming with Jimi at Ronnie Scots the night before, so he knew exactly where Jimi was.
    I also wondered why he wrote the song “Spill The Wine” when no real reference to its relevance appears in the song.Could it have been that he (Burden) had the vivid memory of Jimi’s murder on his mind,watching as much of the wine poured down Jimi’s throat ‘spilled’ in the murderous act.
    Burden has also changed his version of events and did have a motive.

    • “Spill The Wine” was one of the first things I checked-out. It was released in May 1970 so it couldn’t have been in reference to Jimi’s murder because Jimi died in September. No, as far as I know I don’t see Burdon having anything to do with it. He was asleep with Alvinia Bridges back at the Russell Hotel when Monika called there for help. Shoot, Jeffery ripped Eric off blind of millions with the Animals. There’s no way Jeffery was sharing anything with Burdon, or anyone for that matter. Also, I think the band War was doing fairly well at the time. Jimi had a borderline lethal dose of Vesparax sleeping tablets in him according to his autopsy, so I don’t think he needed to be restrained. His blood barbiturate level showed he was passed-out when the wine was poured in to him. I would be curious, however, of learning where you heard Burdon was with Monika earlier that day? I’ve never heard that.

  19. “Craigy” is obviously ignorant of this case. If he had a more intelligent researched understanding he would know that Scotland Yard has already had a go at this case and was clearly not interested in finding out the truth. What Craigy writes is foolish and is easily disproven by the simple fact that Scotland Yard is one of the foremost detective agencies on the planet with a world class reputation that gave birth to figures like Sherlock Holmes and many films. What Craigy is asking us to believe is that he, in his bar-room folksy manner, was able to fathom that Monika was somehow guilty of murdering Jimi but Scotland Yard, when given the chance to look in to it, wasn’t able to figure that out. Like I said before Craigy and his patent disingenuousness and cross-eyed stumbling upon his own logic is a classic representation of the very British people who murdered Jimi Hendrix and the false domain they call England along with its easily refuted, insincere reasoning and methods.

    Scotland Yard was asked to re-investigate this by Kathy Etchingham in 1992. They did a going-through-the-motions pretend investigation and then announced in 1993 that there was no new evidence and that the British taxpayers would not be asked to pay for any further inquiries. Mind you, this was at the same time that Monika’s story was proven to be false, yet Scotland Yard backed it and its veracity and said there was no new evidence. They lied. Also, Dr Bannister had come forward to say Jimi was drowned in wine. Scotland Yard’s reaction? They never even interviewed Dr Bannister. You would think the attending doctor’s coming forward to say he witnessed evidence of Jimi being drowned in wine would be something Scotland Yard might be interested in? No, instead they ignored it and said there was no new evidence. If Dr Bannister’s witnessing wasn’t “new evidence” I don’t know what else would be? Yet, despite this clear record of Scotland Yard duplicity Craigy insists we should dutifully go to them and ask them to look in to it. He never once breaks form to realize the reason Scotland Yard then, in 1992, as well as now, never honestly investigated it was because it was a covert political assassination done by one of their MI-6 members Michael Jeffery.

    • About Eric Burdon:

      In his 2nd autobiography DON’T LET ME BE MISUNDERSTOOD (2001), Burdon has seriously contradicted himself.

      Toward the end of Chapter 7 –his account of the death of Jimi Hendrix– Burdon says that he has read Tony Brown’s THE FINAL DAYS OF JIMI HENDRIX (1997) and has now been persuaded that Monika’s stories were less than truthful.

      In Brown’s book, the statements of two ambulance drivers Reg Jones and John Saua –neither of whom had worked together before or since — are cited on pp. 135-137.

      Reg Jones: “….nobody about, just the body on the bed.” (135)
      John Saua: “When we got down to the flat, there was nobody there. Just the body on the bed.”

      Yet, on the first page of chapter seven, Burdon tells us that the ambulance drivers told him that Jimi would be OK as they were carrying him up the stairs.

      Hard to believe.

      • But in the book,Burdon don’t say that the ambulance drivers told it to him. Just say “I was told Jimi was still alve”, so if no were the paramedics who said that, was Monika who said it to Burton, and she was liar.

      • Burdon knows a lot more than he’s saying. The comments in ‘Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood’ were made in 2001, 5 years after Monika’s death when Eric could retreat into a permanent safe position. Trust me, Eric knew that Monika’s stories were less than truthful at the time. He just can’t admit it because it would incriminate him. They were afraid Jeffery would murder them too so they concocted a bs cover story and stuck to it. Now they can’t admit it. Monika killed herself over it, or was suicided by some very evil people.

        It is a very interesting English Court drama Eric lives indeed. They killed our magic prince…

    • My reply to you is if we are so corrupt here in the UK why is it we have just sent to prison a man who just a few years ago by just a few votes nearly became our Dupty PM but now after his own addmission of fraud is now serving hard time.
      All so other mps and members of our “FREE” press are doing hard time for wrong doing in clear site of the public and are being punished for wrong doing at public approval.
      If you look back in between your own ramblings I have repeatedly agreed that lies were told and things not done right regards Jimis case, but if hear say and fantasy are spouted as fact then no one would get to the truth, you are just muddying the waters, and you are very much helping the people you claim to be against.

      Who ever “THEY” are.

      Your own unashamed rasism against the UK serves no one but your own agender. Yes its easy to say I wont go to the British police their the bad guys.
      What are you going to do ?

      Ok, well done, you figured it out, the rest of us are stupid dolts.BRAVO!!

      Now what are you going to do ?
      Write a book?…………………………………. well done that will really show them.
      No seriously what are you going to do ? Apart from throwing insults at me peddling your bias against this country

      Jimi was an open person , properly to open , had no prejudice, but he wouldn’t have put up with you and your bigoted attitude for two seconds.

      So insult away but tell we what are you really going to do because if you went public with what youve said you’ll be laughed at.

      Monika a credible witness? Please ! You contratic your self at every turn and your only arguement is insults and bias. Thats not debate. Thats not fact. I can agree to defer but not trade insults.

      Hey BUSTER who really are you . Where are you. Do you even exist .

      You have no credibiity if you don,t come forward and just hide behind Jimis child hood nick name

      All the best Craig McTaggart

  20. I’m sorry Craigy but your input shows a complete ignorance of the Cold War practices of our Central Intelligence Agency. If I may, I believe a few good books would not hurt in your case. You fail to fathom that the answer to the conflicts you wonder over is the very information that I posted. That the British government had a unholy covert alliance with our CIA and cooperated in the cover-up of their political assassinations. If you ridicule the very notion of those assassinations I suggest you study some American history and the murder of Black Panthers by the American government’s COINTELPRO Program. Your input is quite passable if we were to limit this to offhand street talk, however we are much deeper into some very real things connected to some very real and proven government assassination programs that you have failed to live up to in your responses.

    No, your admission that lies were told and Jimi wasn’t done proper justice isn’t good enough I’m afraid and once again serves to show a pure example of the British treatment of this and how they are afraid to confront the Crown and its autocratic authority. Your answer isn’t good enough and doesn’t respond in a credible manner to the proof that Scotland Yard acted with intent in covering-up the evidence they were responsible, by their own self-definition, to follow-through on. No, instead of pressing Scotland Yard on its duplicity Craigy attacks those who are trying to do Jimi justice. This is typical of the brits and they don’t seem to know if they are attacking or defending with their vicious, thuggish approach. Craigy accuses me of muddying the waters, but I suspect Craigy is just parroting things he doesn’t quite understand the meaning of because a true sounding of the real reasons for Jimi’s death is just the opposite and is one of the most clarifying things you could possibly do.

    I think most people can see by now that Craigy is just a boorish blusterer who doesn’t quite know what he is saying himself but is quite sure of his conviction. He’s too ignorant to know the waters he’s entered or what truly lurks beneath them.

    • Paranoia < like all mental illness comes in many forms.

      As for why the British establishment would want to kill Hendrix is beyond me, not through any lack of understanding on my part but more because from growing up in this country I know there would be many more people way up the list before him. People who are still alive and in rude health in there old age.

      Also you refused to say where you live thus denying me the right of reply.

      Your view of this country is about face. The Crown has no power,our Parliment a little,our courts a little more.My country is, like I suspect yours is mainly run by big business. Im not happy about this as Im sure your not, but Im not naive enough to believe the Prime Minister runs the country. No body does, but thats another matter because that by proxy does not mean you arguement is corrct.

      As for bluster ! ! Shheeess Jesus H . Mine have been very small and direct compared to your own senseless and rather loooooooooonnnnggg ramlblings.

      I need to read more books? Well of coarse I do , we all do. I read many books while getting my History degree and with,time and god willing ,I'll read many more before I'm done.
      I'll also not believe everything I read in those books and come to my own conclusions.

      I was quite serious when stating you should show these posts to a neutral third party, they show some very worring signs of paranoia and manic depression. Thats not a cheap shot to discredit you , thats a genuine corncern for another
      human being who seems quite distubed.

      I hope you do though I doubt it , as youv'e refused to address directly a single piont I,ve made, just long rambling, repetitive posts and then and then accuseing me of bluster!! Bad spelling Yes, The length of my posts compared to yours no.

      So I wish you all the luck in the world , you might one day find that smoking gun.
      Im of to persue my busy , but .modest music career , and if Icome across anything to do with the Hendrix case I know where not to come.

      If you do find any proper evidence please try and contact me directly, I know of a number of indepedent people in the media who would love to take a swing at the so called "Establishment" in this country. I repeat this is the time.
      These posts now end All the best Craig McTaggart.

      Ps .Peace and best wishes to the people of Boston .USA. 12.04.2o13

  21. Again, I don’t think any sensible person would take Craigy seriously. I thank him for doing all the work to show us he doesn’t have a credible opinion on this. I actually thank Craigy for his input because he represents a good example of why Jimi Hendrix’s murder went unsolved for so many decades in the country where he was murdered. He can’t give any credible answer to why Scotland Yard failed to detect any of the evidence and that’s all you need to know about Craigy, his methods, or his credibility. Sorry Craigy, blather is no substitute for credible analysis. Get back to us when you can honestly answer the facts.

    • Hey Buster do you have a website or Further reading resources online? I am a Brit and have no hesitation in agreeing with you beliefs of how Jimi met his end.

      • I wish I did. I was banned by the morons who run Crosstown Torrents because I tried to show the evidence. I was permanently banned by a British coward who hides behind the handle “Fenders Fingers”. He’s a brave and powerful man when he can make truth-tellers disappear with the moderator censor button. That site is run by a puff who calls himself “Pat”. He allows bastard moderators to troll the site and rough-up serious posters. His view of defending Jimi against his murder was simply “You can’t do that here.” He shouldn’t be allowed to run the internet’s only major Hendrix site, he’s not qualified. None of those cowards show up outside of their bully pit to back their Hendrix death views in the real man’s world.

        Try reading Britisher Tony Brown’s book ‘Hendrix The Final Days’. Also read the murder parts in Henderson’s ‘Scuse Me While I Kiss The Sky’ 2009 edition. Finally, though she gets the cause of death totally wrong, read Sharon Lawrence’s book ‘Jimi Hendrix: The Intimate Story Of A Betrayed Musical Legend’. It contains much valuable witnessing when viewed in the correct murder context.

  22. Buster, great points. So, Burdon’s claims that Jimi’s poem ” The Story of Jesus (sic)” being a suicide note was a feeble attempt at using an alibi ?

    What stands out most to me is that Jimi was found dead in bed fully clothed.

    The introduction to the last edition of David Henerson’s book, he makes a statement referencing Jeffeys, Burbon , AND Alan Douglas as people who were all connected to Jimi directly or indirectly (peripheral people) the night/morning of his death; Henderson’s not too cryptic way of saying the three worked in harmony or possibly independent towards Jimi’s demise .

    Where does Alan Douglas fit in all of this. I know Jimi was banging his wife ( as well a Eric Burdon’s wife) but I thought Douglas was not at issue with this fact.

    How do you interpret Hendereon’s triangle ?

  23. Bingo. It’s nice to see someone with an intelligent understanding respond for a change. That’s why I’m into this because this is a wicked scandal of monumental dimensions equal to that of Jimi himself. Persons with a good sense of this will see Jimi is a prophetic figure whose fate is in direct proportion to his being. If you look closely Eric’s going on BBC and saying Jimi committed suicide was his way to keep from being killed for what he knew. You see Eric had a healthy understanding of Michael Jeffery and his dimensions.

    If you read Monika’s book ‘The Inner World Of Jimi Hendrix’ she said Jimi turned to her and told her he thought Devon had OD’d him. However in the same book Monika said Jimi was talking with her casually up until 7am when she fell asleep. Most Hendrix fan dummies don’t catch the conflict in that. You see Jimi last saw Devon at the Kameron party. If Devon had OD’d Jimi with a mickey then normal drug behavior would dictate that Jimi would feel it immediately upon getting to the Samarkand and pass-out shortly after – which would preclude the 4 hour gap Monika speaks of from 3 to 7. Unfortunately, if you have a good decoding of Monika and her statements this creates some ugly morbid possibilities. Jimi probably did tell Monika that but in reaction to the Vesparax he was overdosed with. I’ll leave it to your imagination how this scenario illustrates Monika’s involvement, however anyone can see she certainly can’t be innocent at this point and on the other end the possibilities are frightening. Jimi was obviously found fully-clothed because the 9 Vesparax hit him like a hammer. And that’s what he was trying to tell Monika.

    Thank God there’s other people who intelligently detect Henderson’s subtle suggestions. When I recently re-read Henderson that is the exact thing that came to my head, that he was trying to say something without saying it directly. I guess he was trying not to get sued. Douglas was probably just a hopeful producer who stepped back after Jimi’s murder because he realized the people involved were dangerous. I doubt he had any direct jealousy-based involvement in Jimi’s death. However I’m 100% certain he knows a lot more than he’s saying, so he’s one of many who got away with not telling what they really knew. That’s the real story of Jimi. How many people there were around him who betrayed him out of cowardice. Douglas is one of them. I think what Henderson is really getting at is the three persons mentioned all had some kind of focused pressure on Jimi that night. Burdon and Douglas in a cowardly way, and Jeffery in a murderous one. I assure you Burdon knows the real truth. You can tell just by looking at how he’s been dying to give hints in his books over the years. Douglas high-tailed it to France.

    You can’t tell me Scotland Yard couldn’t figure this stuff out. The reason they play dumb is because Jimi was murdered by one of their own Military Intelligence agents and they don’t want that black mark on England. They don’t want Jimi’s body so visibly crucified like the Story Of Jesus on Big Ben for all to see. For goodness sakes a first year criminology student could see through all this, why couldn’t Scotland Yard? The answer is because Jimi was wacked by CIA’s COINTELPRO program using Jeffery’s problems with him as plausible cover. That’s the story here and when you input it everything else, including the unaccountable disinterest by the authorities, all makes sense. Only a true prophet would have such an obviously tragic fate and only get an occassional person interested every year or so.

  24. Buster, I have been trying for decades to put the pieces together and I can say that your explanations are the only ones that give a logical, fact based closure to this.

    I was one of the group that believed the “Jeffery/insurance payout (bailout)” was the motive for Jimi’s murder but your simple statement of , “Why would Scotland Yard protect a two-bit scumbag manager lawyer like Jeffery?” was the epiphany I needed… even more so, why would they protect a DEAD Jeffery ? He was just one of the many pawns , albeit an important pawn, in this disgusting web of deceit.

    I am very well aware of the world of black ops. Unfortunately, the delusional and ignorant pass the reality of these operations off as being spoken of by “conspiracy theory kooks”, a tactic much like calling someone a racist, used to thwart a discussion by avoiding the facts. There are innumerable books on black ops. As you mentioned, 28 Black Panthers were murdered by these operations (some say Tupac was # 29). Jimi had a FBI file, for Goodness sake, with a bunch of names blacked out so the public will not know who was working on the inside (I wonder how many times Jeffery’s name is written/blacked out in that file).

    I guess the world becomes a pretty scary place when you discover that the Easter Bunny does not exist and instead of facing the reality , sticking your head under the covers and pretending all is well is the easiest solution.

    Buster, I would love to read some of your other “discussions” with the Internet Turds. Can you direct me to some other blogs that you have participated in ?
    Thanks

  25. There’s a dividing line between credibility and uncredibility. The morons on Crosstown Torrents fall on the wrong side of that line and practice the conspiracy theory dismissal you speak of. The storms of history will wash them into the gutters and away to the scummy pools they belong in. They’re ignorant cowards and knowing liars who censor people who defend Jimi. Smarter more knowledgeable persons will realize Jeffery’s use as a pawn is classic of powerful government agency assassinations. They’re too dumb to see that as a member of British Army Military Intelligence Jeffery was one of them and was made offers he couldn’t refuse. If we could bare Jimi’s redacted FBI files we would almost certainly see departments and names as well as code words for FBI entities associated with their CHAOS and COINTELPRO assassination programs. Read Phil Strongman’s book on Lennon and you’ll see experts at deciphering FBI files can see the red flags they are covering with black ink. Just membership on the FBI Security Index alone automatically put you in a dangerous statistical category. That includes Jeffery as well, by the way, who died in a freakish mid air plane crash that was very convenient to the people covering up Jimi’s murder.

    • Bless Eric. Like I said, he’s been giving the best hints he could out of guilt over the years. He’s either trying not to get arrested or killed – or both. I sympathize with him and almost certainly would have done the same thing considering the times and circumstances. It’s easy to judge Eric in hindsight but put yourself in his shoes and consider how easy it was to kill Jimi with impunity and you’ll start to understand why he looked the other way. Eric didn’t kill Jimi, Michael did. But isn’t it a bloody travesty that this stuff like Eric’s quote above is so fucking obvious yet persons like me are banned for pointing it out and there’s no follow-through. It’s simple common sense to see that when you think of who and what the “business” that killed Jimi was that Michael Jeffery is the one who embodied the business end of Jimi. Poor Eric is telling us Jimi was murdered by Jeffery. He just can’t say it directly. God bless him.

  26. Again, Buster, I wish to thank you for your spot on analysis of the events that surround this incredible situation.

    I am not British but please stay on the path and keep a stiff upper lip. The fact that you are pissing people off and getting banned tells me that you are doing something right. I am confident in saying that your detractors do not possess the insight, knowledge or intellect that you have exhibited in this arena and their feckless duplicitous manner should only act as a minor inconvenience as you move forward on the “mission”. To say that one has steel in their balls would probably be interpreted by that group as a vulgar insult…enough said.

    I will be checking this page periodically in hopes that you continue to post with the intent of keeping the throngs up to date with the events as they unfold.

    Bests to you …..

  27. My recent participation on the blog has stirred my to reread several Hendrix books and last night I read a part that I had previously not given proper notice to. It seems that a member of Vanilla Fudge , who happened to be managed by none other than Michael Jeffery, was killed in a suspicious car accident. Upon hearing the news, chills went down Jimi’s spine… he had no doubts who was responsible for the death of this musician.

    I tried to search for info on this but came up with ZERO. Is the Fudge guy another feather on Jeffery’s cap ?

  28. I found internet search information on that Vanilla Fudge member a while back but can’t find it now. I’m glad you noticed that. That’s what I’ve been trying to tell people is that Tony Brown was on to a lot more than he said directly. You have to read Brown in the context that he’s putting these things out there with serious intent but letting the reader interpret its meaning. Whatever the exact name of the Vanilla Fudge member was it is very likely that information was gotten to Jimi as a purposeful message. Actually it is even worse than you imagine. The manager of Vanilla Fudge was Phil Basile, a member of the New York Lucchese crime family whom Jeffery associated with. The reason Jimi got scared upon hearing that news is because Basile and Jeffery had kidnapped him in order to send a message. Also, Jimi’s friend Bobby Woods ended up dead on his back on a Queens NY street with his arms crossed across his chest and several bullets in his head. Woods was a bartender at the mafia’s Salvation Club. The same club that Jeffery had taken mob thugs up to Jimi’s house in order to intimidate him into playing at. You can see how right out in the open all this stuff is.

    On September 17 Jimi decided all this stuff made Jeffery a bad deal. He called Jeffery’s lawyer Henry Steingarten and told him to sever his ties with Jeffery once and for all. 12 hours later Jimi was found dead under strange circumstances.

    • My brother Tony Brown also died in 1999 massive heart attack and a whiskey bottle by he’s side
      After he wrote he’s last book on Jimi Hendrix he did know loads more what he never put in he’s books but like all the rest it’s gone to he’s grave…someone got to Tony too! I think
      We were going to Lanzarote next thing I knew tony was dead…I’ve never wrote anything like this before but reading your blog I feel closer to tony and jimi

  29. @Buster… it was very obvious that Tony Brown knew much more than he published in his book. I’ve always wondered why he left so much open for interpretation (speculation?). Was libel a real and valid concern ? Some feel that Monika poured the wine down Jimi’s pipes but that does not add up. MJ and cohorts seems more likely.

    Do you feel that Tappy’s account is the most accurate rendering of the series of events ?

  30. You can tell from the way Tony Brown sets up the information that anyone who had as much knowledge of the case as himself would naturally have drawn further conclusions. That was my one criticism of the book, that Brown could have helped the reader by at least drawing some of those conclusions in public. I sort of did that for him in this thread. You have to understand Monika initiated a vicious libel battle with Kathy just a few years prior, so Brown was probably aware of the potential problems of going too far with his evidence. Plus people like Brown don’t want to appear too aggressive or they’ll lose future interviews. When pushed into a corner on the murder of a famous person people will sue. Unfortunately those people had a great partner in the British government and its non-investigation. Monika appears to have been thrown to the dogs as a scapegoat in order to shut her up. Her death was somewhat predictable considering what would have happened if she were still alive after Tappy’s claim.

    There are some serious insiders who feel Monika was the one who murdered Jimi by forcing wine down his throat. I disagree because criminal profiling shows that such a calculated death is not the modus operandi of a shy blond German artist. There was a methodology to that murder that precluded impulsive female reaction. The pills were planned. That kind of planning puts you squarely within the modus operandi of intel. You have to play Sherlock Holmes and look at the evidence. Monika called Burdon shortly after the event to get help. If Monika had murdered Jimi criminal behavior patterns would make it more likely that she would not have brought attention to herself so quickly. If Monika did such a thing she more likely would have let Jimi lie and pretended to find him after waking up herself. Plus, if you look at Monika’s relationship to Jimi she was looking to keep him, not murder him. Forcing wine down someone’s throat while unconscious is, however, the type of covert murder method someone like Michael Jeffery would be familiar with. Plus, if you are sharp you’ll notice Jimi’s body was found on the bed untouched and covered in vomit. This shows that the people who cleaned up the flat knew he was dead. If there was any question of life someone would have tried to save him. The reason Jimi was found that way is because the people who first got to him knew he was dead and there was no point in trying to aid him. Jeffery had a serious motive and means, Monika was the patsy. In the end, the forensic evidence perfectly dovetails with Tappy’s tale. However, if true, Jeffery was clever enough to leave out the fact he got Monika to dose Jimi. Probably in return for Hendrix-access favors. If Jeffery did say that to Tappy, the forensic evidence precludes the pills being shoved down Jimi’s throat by the murderers. Jimi’s barbiturate level showed that the pills had been inside him for about 2 hours.

    There is a very real wicked alternative possibility here that Monika was a CIA operative drafted as part of the COINTELPRO program to infiltrate Jimi. However I don’t think she was a directed killer because, if you are sharp, her pattern of giving hints over the years is not what such a person would do. Her pattern is more like a cooperator who was used and did not know the intention of her users. A Mata Hari who infiltrated Jimi and was then used to set him up for murder. CIA had some very bizarre capabilities with those programs I won’t go into here because they are above the heads of the average Crosstown Tyrants feces tossers and mugwumps. Yes, there is a possibility Monika was wicked as they come. That she murdered Jimi under covert orders and later framed Jeffery once he was dead. Jeffery’s business motives could be effectively used as a plausibly deniable reason. So instead of poor innocent Monika being played by Jeffery, it was Jeffery being played by world class Cold War intelligence wolves out for a big political target who threatened their covert banks. But once you realize Jeffery was MI-6 we are talking the same thing and it doesn’t make much difference since they were all part of the same intel cause. Do you see now the tenterhooks the British government hangs on here and why it ignores such obvious evidence?

  31. Patsy is a very interesting term. Do you think the herculean effort of cleaning the murder scene by Burdon, Terry Slater, et al was to keep Monika from becoming the ultimate patsy in the Oswald sense ? Damage control possibly ? Or perhaps Monika was told “Clean this shit up , Bitch, or you’ll be next… ” as MJ exited the Samarkind?

    And why do you think Eric, Slater, Wong , etc would help with the clean up and get placed in the middle of a murder ?

    And for those of you who disbelieve MK Ultra mind control and the wicked world of intel operatives take note of this video clip. Please remember that what you are about to see is the actual scenario and not a re-encatment

  32. It all depends on what the cleaners knew. They could have been told Jimi OD’ed and just wanted to clean the place of any drug evidence while they strategized a plan. So, once Monika involved them they were the ones who cooked-up the pretend you woke up and found him that way story.

    You can see how complex this is because there are so many levels of possibility. If the clean-up crew knew Jimi was murdered then their clean-up takes on more intent of removing evidence and allowing Jeffery to get away in order to relieve any consequences for themselves. Chances are they knew, simply because of their behavior and not speaking about it. After all, with all that’s come out in the last few years you would think there would at least be a comment from those people? Not a peep.

    It’s very possible the motivation for the clean-up was to avoid endangering themselves with Jeffery. At that point Monika’s role wasn’t significant. She just happened to be there at the time. Her job then became to stick with her story no matter what. And that’s basically what she did up until the issue finally coming to bear led to her death.

    Interesting that Monika said Stickells and Barret were only interested in phone messages and notes from Jeffery. Monika was a bit dizzy because she wrote in her book that only Jimi and her knew about the Samarkand in order to escape the office. So how could there be any phone messages from Jeffery?

    • The governments in question used 9-11 to install the self-serving intelligence agency rogue rule they had enjoyed previously by covert means at the formal level. Which, as you say, saved them the bother of going through the motions and making themselves look bad with corrupted methods and decisions. Now they can just officially ignore you and blow you off. Those rotten governments used the Cold War to install undemocratic military rule with the excuse it was justified by the extremes of potential nuclear war. As history shows, once those powers are taken they are not given back because those who benefit from them are not going to give up their conveniences, even if there is no longer any enemy to apply them towards.

      Jimi’s case is much more provable. At some point Scotland Yard must be made to answer for its obvious failures in the Hendrix murder.

    • Monika’s language difficulty may have made her say ‘shot’ when she meant ‘dosed’. The two people Jeffery murdered were likely Devon and maybe Bobby Woods. Or perhaps Monika meant Devon and Jimi?

      If you pay attention Monika slipped and told the real time she dropped Jimi at Kameron’s – midnight. She had told everyone else 1:30am. She also slipped and said 9am for her wake up time. This was one of the three times she had given over her various stories of 9 – 10:20 and 11.

      • If you’re a clever detective like I am you’ll notice Monika starts saying “They should have cut his…” and then abruptly stops and regathers her words. If you are sharp you’ll understand that when Monika was thinking about a tracheostomy she was about to say “They should have cut his throat”. Listen to the clip. The reason she abruptly stopped is because it was too close to the truth and gave her a nervous reaction that made her search for different words. Monika couldn’t bring herself to say “They should have cut his throat”.

    • Good question. No, I don’t think it is. I’ve heard the Caesar radio show recording and I’m pretty sure it’s different than this one. So I think this one is an unknown interview on a different show from the same time period because she basically tells the same story she told Caesar. To show how dirty the powers that be are and how much CIA controls things you can’t find the Caesar show recording on the internet any more even though it used to be available. And that pig Caesar is probably keeping it under wraps because it makes Monika look bad. You can contact the guy who posted it, Richard Anthony, but he’s mainly oriented towards his weird publication that promotes the theory Monika did it with poisoned wine.

      • “…And that pig Caesar…” Amen,a turd on the same level as Fender’s Finger. These people seem to dedicate their lives to the memory of Jimi but instead of searching for truth, clarification and justice they are determined to paint a picture of the events that led to Jimi’s demise in their preconceived vision(version) as opposed to logically interrupting the facts as they unfold.

        I can not understand Caesar’s motive nor how he gets away with his own special brand of Yellow Journalism.

        Totally reprehensible…

  33. …plus, was Billy’s dosing an intentional sabotage or just a byproduct of the times as backstage drink spiking was commonplace in that era?

    • Good question. I’m not sure because, like most things involved with this, there’s too little information and the people involved aren’t talking. But, Meromeri, remember that Jeffery was probably successful in breaking Buddy Miles away from Jimi with acid at the Madison Square Garden moratorium concert. Jeffery was trying to force Jimi back into the Experience with Noel on bass because that was his money maker he could control. So I would not be shocked if Jeffery played his usual tricks and dosed Billy. However, also remember Billy was around rehearsing at the Catskills house when Jeffery did his mafia intimidation and was a first hand witness to Jimi being spooked about it. If you think about it Billy was one of Jimi’s best friends so naturally Jimi probably voiced his fears to Billy. So even if it was a random spiking it hit Billy broadside right when he was already stressed about Jeffery and probably sparked a paranoia that was already brewing in Billy anyway. I’m pissed at Billy because he could help Jimi by clearing this up but he doesn’t talk about it. Hey, thanks for helping Jimi Billy. What I’ve come to figure out lately is that Jimi was also probably spiked that night as well but had a harder head for acid and rode it out. That bad acid could explain some of Jimi’s weird behavior during those final days. This whole thing fascinates me because there’s an epic opera here that needs to be figured out to do justice for Jimi. I’m just being figurative when I say opera because I consider this a serious cause for a real hero and brother of mine who is calling us from the grave like Hamlet. This discussion belongs on Crosstown Torrents but the cowardly British-oriented scumbags have censored it under that cowardly tyrant ‘Fender’s Fingers’.

      • Billy, Terry Slater, BuddyMiles (RIP), Judy Wong , etc can shed light on this but after almost 44 years are seeming scared of the forces to be.

  34. Sorry to inform you Judy Wong rip 2005 and Terry Slater rip 2008.

    I figure Caesar does it because his magazine depends on information from surviving Hendrix people. And as we have shown, most of them, unfortunately, are holding back on Jimi in order to cover their cowardly asses. That’s why I’m in this business because Jimi created a perfect storm of fame that was just big enough for all those involved to justify their betrayal. As far as Crosstown Tyrants, they are a weird mix of idiots, degenerate creeps, smug Hendrix aficionados, and an obvious core of British-based members who control their bias in a British-type of censoring way on an American website. This is because the owner “Pat”, whose, as far as I can tell, main qualification is being a Hawks fan, is a numbnuts whose main interest is probably Hendrix computer geekery. He has no intellectual integrity whatsoever that would qualify him as the overseer of the internet’s main Hendrix site. So those British bastards get away with censoring the murder topic on his site. The result is the remaining content is moronic and only serves the cowardly needs of fans wanting to grab free Hendrix souvenirs. Eventually we’ll have to form a free site to counter it I guess. What gets me the most is some of those Crosstown creeps know what I posted is true but still troll it. Or the fools who pose their stupidity as being the best course for Jimi. That’s good because that’s the evil sector I wanted to handle personally. As far as Caesar, in traditional fables those who betray the object of their interest so badly usually suffer some kind of befitting fate.

  35. Rolling Stone Magazine’s headline for Jimi’s stamp, “Going Postal”, is derogatory. The best way to describe what is wrong with Jimi’s stamp is that it is a cartoon. Jimi wasn’t a cartoon, man. Part of the reason Jimi’s murder isn’t being investigated is because of this weird indirect political/racist bias against Jimi where he isn’t quite taken seriously or given the mainstream attention, like with the evidence for his murder, that rock stars of his stature would be given. All society has proven, and even major rock publications, is that you can praise Jimi while murdering him at the same time. That in itself is what Jimi stood for and why he is special and important. Dig? That’s what you need staring back at you from a Hendrix stamp, not some piss yellow-toned psychedelic mush.

  36. I just got a couple of sheets today. The only this uglier than the stamp is the picture of Jimi on the back side of the stamp sheet … or maybe the Band of Gypsys cover.

    • rsIam very surprised that an earlier entry of mine on this subject was somehow omitted over a period of years.It dealt with the fact that the British government shut down it’s Forensic Science Division citing funding.At that time the Director of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (Dr.Buono) was extremely critical of this decision.Meanwhile all conscious individuals should continue their efforts to produce justice in this matter.

  37. Over on Crosstown Tyrants the poster Ezy Ryder opened a thread asking what would be your biggest regret regarding Jimi? The responses started off by mentioning songs people wished Jimi had done live. The poster Pali Gap then wrote: “Well apart from the obvious, I wish he hadn’t taken that fatal overdose in Sept 1970.” Pali Gap’s profile shows he’s from London. You have to understand that English fans are generally in denial that Jimi was murdered and don’t want to admit their hero was subjected to a wicked death by Englishmen. As all the real evidence shows, Jimi did not take a fatal dose. He took a borderline lethal dose, according to the manufacturer, and didn’t have enough time to overdose. Nor would his famous tolerance for barbiturates allow him to overdose from such a borderline dose.

    The poster Purplehazechild them chimes-in that he wished Jimi had never met Monika Dannemann. If Purplehazechild is trying to say Jimi was murdered he doesn’t give enough detail. But rest assured Purplehazechild holds back because the site is hostile towards people who speak the truth and attacks them. Crosstown Tyrants has no problem allowing people to suggest Jimi died a way that he provably did not. It’s only when you can intelligently argue the evidence that they take action. Anyone who defends Jimi will be banned.

    Mourningstar then chimes-in with one of his ass-kissing inanities. He’s a suck-up of the worst sort and will enter the cowardly evasion he does in order to serve the site bulls. His input is obviously guided by his cowardice over telling the truth. He doesn’t care if these people are in cowardly denial of Jimi’s murder as long as he can post.

    Uncle Cami then adds the best example of the site’s duplicitous orientation. He says: “Wouldn’t have mattered. He would have died anyway, I believe. He was reckless.” This is the popular Caesar Glebbeek blaming-the-victim canard. It’s a cowardly, condescending attempt to pose Jimi as some kind of ignorant colored man who didn’t know what he was doing and killed himself. Uncle Cami and Caesar are people who will allow Jimi to be the subject of their great fanhood but pity him at the same time. No intelligent discussion of how Jimi’s problems were directly attributable to Michael Jeffery will ever come from them. This is a completely acceptable opinion on Crosstown Tyrants that gets not one peep of protest from the ignoratti who attend it.

    Poster deek57 chimes-in blaming Monika. These people know there’s something wrong, but they blame Monika. The evidence I showed proving Jeffery did it isn’t even registered by these dumb-asses. It bounces off their thick heads.

    The poster karsten then blames Jimi, saying his death was a repeat of other similar reckless barbiturate use Jimi did in that last month. Karsten is yet another poster who ignores the evidence for murder in the autopsy data that disproves accidental overdose. These preferred Crosstown members can literally be shown the evidence yet they ignore it and proffer their idiotic, dumbed-down version. These people are in denial Michael Jeffery murdered Jimi. They are saying Jimi himself and the Vesparax did it, even though it is provably untrue if you practice a level of analysis above the moronic one they practice.

    Pali Gap then adds that he doesn’t think Monika did it, that it was an accident. Sure, an accident with lungs bursting with wine. These people just ignore Michael Jeffery’s motives and incriminating behavior.

    Mourningstar asks if Monika wasn’t to blame why would she kill herself?

    Purple Jim responds with the wholly disingenuous answer that Monika killed herself over depression from losing the court case against Kathy. These Crosstown deniers always seek the quickest, easiest excuse and don’t involve any of the incriminating evidence that shows otherwise. You must keep to the moronic dumbed-down script on Crosstown. Nothing else is allowed.

    Purple Jim is a notorious gatekeeper and liar on the subject. He has a dishonest web page where he mocked me as being a crazy conspiracy theorist. Of course he never honestly discussed any of my evidence nor does his page allow comments. That is a typical Crosstown playing field. Mocking denial with no ability to respond. Caesar practices the same thing. You don’t see those lying cowards show up here where they would have to defend their ignorance and stupidity. The British coward Fender’s Fingers, with his attack dog avatar, makes sure the site is cleansed of anyone who can factually argue the murder evidence. The owner Pat Peterson prefers it that way. I don’t know who Peterson is or his background but how he came to be the controller of this subject needs to be reviewed. I think most of the posters on Crosstown are either cowardly or stupid. However I suspect there’s a small percentage of them who know Jimi was murdered and post disinformation for political reasons. Peterson is their welcoming host.

    How did those assholes ever get in control of the prevailing Hendrix community opinion on Jimi’s death? What kind of cowards does Jimi have as fans?

    http://crosstowntorrents.org/showthread.php?20792-If-Hendrix-only-your-biggest-regrets

  38. It is rather bizarre how they stubbornly refuse to even consider new scientifically based evidence. The Herd Mentality is a signature trait of the WASP culture.

    I am very disappointed in the non-action of Gerry Stickells, Tony Slater, Mitch and Billy Cox. Billy’s mental and physical state at the time of the tragedy could be a valid excuse though. I wouldn’t be surprised if he actually mentally blocked the entire episode.

    And the other three, being English, might possibly be(been) in the same crosshairs as Jimi. So, their silence may possibly be out of self preservation rather than indifference towards Jimi.

    Janie’s indifference is really the most troubling. She has the time , money and connections to find out the truth … she may possibly know the truth. I guess the ringing of the cash register inspires her to leave well enough alone.

  39. The Crosstown site’s members are basically computer nerds of the MP-3 culture and probably Hendrix collectors who have been around long enough to be the names in the business. They’ve learned to get along you don’t get hung up on things like Jimi’s murder because it will draw heat to their purpose, which isn’t doing justice for Jimi as his fans but is instead sucking as much as you can get out of him for their own benefit. The theme of that site is internet piracy, not responsibility for Jimi’s murder. It’s a weird mix and Jimi tends to attract a lesser educated peer group of pot smokers who won’t wreck their high hurting their dull brains with things like evidence. Some of them are moronic enough to scold people like me that investigating Jimi’s death is something that does disservice to his memory when the obvious reason they are doing it is because it is easier for them. Pretty dumb. The other group are the professionals to whom the dummies look when they need an opinion on things like this. Those professionals are smart enough to know Jimi was murdered. Some of them even knew it then. They qualify for a particular level of weaseldom because they just lay low and either repeat the official story or avoid the issue all together. These people are afraid because they know they won’t last long in the industry if they speak the truth. I know what you mean about WASP culture but this sort of thing goes beyond ethnicity, though I will say the worst deniers of Jimi’s murder are brits. They obviously don’t want to admit the unavoidable British consequences of this.

    The people you mentioned bought time from the fact Monika made a plausible story of a drug overdose and seeing how that was at least possible people accepted it. Some of them knew Jeffery murdered Jimi. Being of a powerless counter-culture they simply stayed quiet seeing how the authorities were not interested and would probably not help anyway. Most of Jimi’s peers were partying and staying away from the cops, so there wasn’t much they were going to do either. Rock was a rogue culture. It was on its own. It was taken advantage of by all those concerned. Jeffery was alive and a dangerous bastard. He had just neutralized a Security Index target so intel was going to cover him. Yes, those other 3 had things to worry about seeing what happened to Jimi. And with Jimi’s fans being so dumb, like the idiots on Crosstown, who was going to listen? By the way, there’s a good chance some of those attackers of the evidence are intelligence agents.

    Yeah, Janie is probably a person whose personality isn’t prone to proactive pursuit of evidence and legal justice. Though she doesn’t seem to hesitate when it comes to lawyering-up to protect her Hendrix interests. Being a business minded person she probably knows when she’s taking on a system that isn’t going to let her win. When you prove the British Government consciously covered-up Jimi’s murder the liability aspects are huge, so they aren’t going to be trapped by their own law. By the way, I think she already made a public statement saying the way Jimi died and the official story are two different things.

  40. Buster, please excuse me if you have already spoken on this but how does the Bobby Woods’ hit play into all of this , if at all?

    And on a completely different topic, I highly doubt Eric Clapton’s tale of seeing Jimi at the Sly Stone concert the night of his death. As far as I know, Jimi was scheduled to jam with Sly but Clapton is the only person that states that Jimi attended the Family Stone concert.
    Probably mistaken identity.

    Agreed ?

  41. Your guess is as good as mine on Bobby Wood, however I strongly suspect his knowledge of Jeffery’s relationship to his mob bosses at the Salvation had something to do with it. Figure it out. Wood was Jimi’s best friend at the Salvation, was a loose cannon, and had a reputation for having loose lips (not a good trait to have in the mob).

    Why Clapton said that has yet to be figured out. All the known accounts never mention Jimi stopping by the Lyceum to see the Sly concert.

  42. The owner of Crosstown Torrents is Pat Peterson. If you look at his Facebook page he’s a hockey jock and ex-Navy. An interesting thing to note on his Facebook page are the images of NRA and gun-rights links. He’s a right-winger and gun nut. If you could choose a person whom you would not want in charge of the internet’s only major Hendrix site it would be him. He smells spooky and could be a intel agent or person under their control (or politically oriented), which explains the lack of tolerance of discussion of Jimi’s murder on that site. That guy should never be allowed to run the internet’s only Hendrix site. His background fully explains the totally un-Hendrix bully manner in which that site is run.

    Robbie Radio posted Joe Viglione’s article on Buzzy Linhart’s witnessing of Devon Wilson’s saying Jimi was murdered. Typical of the trolls that dominate Crosstown Torrents “Ezy Rider” came on and gave a one-line answer saying it wasn’t credible. Viglione’s article is actually very credible and shows good evidence towards Jimi’s murder. Ezy Rider is just following the enforced line of stupidity on Crosstown where ALL murder discussion is shunned and not credible. The extreme travesty of this is the fact that Ezy Rider, while assuming a position of credibility, is actually the one who isn’t credible. There’s a lot of discussion that should follow in that thread that won’t because of the level of fascist intimidation imposed by the gun nut site owner Pat Peterson and his capo moderators. If you post intelligent information showing that posters like Ezy Rider are just moronic shills knee-jerking dislike you’ll be descended upon quickly by the degenerate thugs who run that site. And run it in favor of those who would cover-up and conceal Jimi’s murder for their own purposes.

    That site should be boycotted out of existence. The Jimi treasures it offers should be given back and the owner should be told what to do with them if it comes at the poisonous price of backing Jimi’s murderers. It disgusts me to see the cowards who embody that site giving in to the deal that they’ll get their Hendrix goodies as long as they consent to the right-wing agenda Crosstown enforces. No poster dares answer that thread honestly because they know what will happen to them under Mr Peterson’s draconian rule. It disgusts me to see the membership consists of cowardly creeps who are willing to sell out Jimi in order to be members.

    • You present a very compelling argument mate. I’ve been playing guitars for 30 years and like all metal heads, I cut my teeth on old school blues like Jimi before moving onto Black Sabbath etc. I’ve never been pro-guns, in fact quite the opposite as in the former Yugoslavia where my parents came from, Serbia ranks second to the USA for “gun nuts” per capita (58% – the USA a whopping 97%!) and has a lot to do with the multi-factorial reasons that destroyed the old Yugoslavia. That site is boycotted. You’ve convinced me. F that site forever. Maybe I’ll create an account there just to troll it in my spare time, haha ;)

    • There’s an evil oppression on that site over discussing Jimi’s murder. That’s why there’s only one stupid response where the poster Ezy Rider pretends to have credibility, entering a negative comment while dismissing the subject. The real truth is the site is occupied by some incredible dumb-asses herd-driven by some dark people in control who intimidate and ban anyone who tries to enter into intelligent discussion of the evidence. Any smart person can see Ezy Rider is just a creep who is only capable of scoffing “not credible” while being totally unable to discuss the finer, more subtle things Buzzy’s witnessing entails:

      http://crosstowntorrents.org/showthread.php?22082-Buzzy-Linhart-Talks-About-Jimi

  43. There’s a shiny brand new user called ‘Electric Lady’ on crosstown and VoodooChild starts off with a good post for ‘Ted Nugent – Like I Needed Another Reason To Not Like This Guy’ (actually I like some of his music, Stranglehold is a good rolly polly bluesy track for instance, but VoodooChild is right about The Nuge when it comes to opinions) and then Renemies chimes in with “I don’t see anything wrong with what he’s saying. Jimi’s drug use is why he died”. Looks like ElectricLady is going to have to wise him up about Mike Jeffery and what really happened. We’ll see what comes of this when “her” account is approved, and I’m finished travelling to Kiev and central Ukraine over the next week…

    The thread’s not that old, so it’s 1st troll on the list :)

    http://crosstowntorrents.org/showthread.php?21775-Ted-Nugent-Like-I-Needed-Another-Reason-To-Not-Like-This-Guy

  44. If you want to understand the evil nature of that site and how it is run by enemies of Jimi (possibly intel) just sign-up and try to tell the truth about the evidence behind Jimi’s murder and watch what happens to you.

  45. Regret to inform that Arthur Allen – one of the Allen Twins and Jimi Hendrix’s Harlem friend from the Ghetto-Fighters has died of fibrotic lung disease. He changed his name to Tunde Ra Aleem years ago.

  46. In their new book ‘Ghetto Fighters In Harlem World’ the Allen Twins made a startling revelation about a witnessing Albert Allen had at Electric Lady Studios. It was Albert Allen who was napping on the couch at Electric Lady when he overheard a conversation between Monika Dannemann and Michael Jeffery. When he jumped-up to announce his presence he saw the famous Samarkand garden photos of Jimi from September 17th laid out on Jeffery’s desk. Included in those photos were two photos of Jimi Hendrix laying on the bed at the Samarkand Hotel obviously dead. Dannemann became the center of a nasty controversy that involved her suing Hendrix bass guitar player Noel Redding for questioning her doings the morning Jimi died. Dannemann had insisted to the authorities that Jimi was alive when he was taken away in the ambulance at 11:30am. When the ambulance men were finally located and questioned in 1992 they came up with a different story saying no one as present at the Hotel and Jimi was obviously dead. What Albert Allen witnessed was proof of that.

    • I can confirm what Buster is saying to be 100% correct. And there has been buzz about Albert’s witnessing for many years. Also, in 1996 Albert confronted Monika via phone about the pictures and Monika did not deny it and within a week, Monika kissed her own arse goodbye from the world.

    • Buster,

      This part of the article above, specifically the quote by Roger Pomphrey, provides intrigue:

      “When I made my documentary there were a couple of people who claimed, offcamera, that Monika was in New York two weeks after Jimi died, and who heard her in close conversation with Mike Jeffery.”

      I think you know what I’m getting at here.

  47. It could just be the original mistaken memory being repeated to Pomphrey. I know Monika was in New York in February 1971. In any case the precise date matters not. It makes sense to me that this new date of 2 weeks later attests to bad memories since it now varies with the “day of Jimi’s death” version told of in the book. Safe to say it was probably Feb ’71.

  48. Hey Buster,

    Stop me if I’m wrong on this one. I’m going back to this quote:

    ” Dr Bannister had never entered any statement on record about the wine.”

    That’s understandable, since he was the ‘Surgical Registrar’ on duty that day, Sept. 18, 1970 at the St. Mary Abbotts Hospital. Which leads to the obvious question. Would it not be the job of the ‘Medical Registrar’ to enter that information on record about the wine? And wasn’t the ‘Medical Registrar’ the same guy (Dr. Seifert) that gave two different stories about Jimi’s medical condition?

    Think maybe Seifert may have been gotten to and blatantly omitted the wine from his report at that time? We know he lied about it later and said he didn’t see any signs of alcohol. And how do we know that? Because there was a 3rd doctor named Bob Brown and he states Jimi had “too much to drink” and that can be seen in this article right here:

    http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/music/about-that-jimi-hendrix-death-business/story-e6frfn09-1226385575798

    And just what would make Bob Brown think Jimi had too much to drink? But of course, the very same red wine Dr. Bannister witnessed.

  49. Yet the dumb-asses on Crosstown Torrents back Seifert and trash Bannister. Unfortunately Brown said that in 2012 so the deniers will just say that he read that later and just repeated it. This whole problem originates from Seifert and Bannister thinking it was just an unfortunate case of drug and alcohol misadventure and never considering foul play. By the time Dr Teare got Jimi for autopsy the critical forensic element of the wine was gone and not represented in the forensic figuring. The covert murder method had worked perfectly, up until people started asking questions years later.

    • But, as we know, UPI reporter Jack Meehan spoke with Gavin Thurston (the coroner) on Sept. 29, 1970, one day after the Inquest concluded, and Thurston told Meehan that Jimi was “imbibed by red wine” — totally backing Bannister and Brown’s statements. Crosstown can deny all they want, but it don’t change reality and all they’re doing is urinating on their own heads and telling themselves it is raining.

      • This is a lie and is not true. Jack Meehan never spoke with Gavin Thurston about “imbibed wine” since there was never any massive wine in Hendrix. Sharon Lawrence wrote in her phony book that this account took place and gave a second hand quote from Meehan about Thurston. This is not credible evidence and there is no record of this meeting ever taking place. Since Hendrix had to wine in his body as claimed this was proven to be a lie. I debunked this whole phony claim in the comments from August 21, 2019 that are below in a 3 Part Series. This is a fake and false quote you use to promote your phony “Hendrix wine murder”. This has been debunked.

  50. That of course is a checkmate that destroys the human scum Crosstown poster stplsd and all the other morons who said there was no proof of the wine. That is proof, if Monika’s admission of the wine wasn’t. What the cowards at Crosstown do is pull the chessboard out from underneath you and ban you when you prove the evidence they are in denial of.

    • That’s right. I’ve seen the the poster stplsd’s ridiculous posts over there and he clearly comes across as a dog with rabies, chasing it’s own tail, as do the others.

  51. Some of the statements regarding Jimi’s condition (on September 18th 1970) are described graphically, so be prepared…

    John Saua was one of the ambulance crew (2 men) who answered the call to 22 Landsdowne Crescent, London on the 18th September 1970. The call came in at 11:18 A.M. They arrived at 11:27 AM. John had only worked with Reg Jones for one month, as Reg Jones’ regular partner was in the hospital. John left that position shortly afterword and had no contact with Reg Jones since, nor were they particularly good mates at the time, being of different age groups. John still is an ambulance man.

    John Saua’s Statement:

    Well, I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out, I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it. The aspirators in those days were all right, but not like you have today. They couldn’t shift that lot.

    We knew it was hopeless. There was no pulse, no respiration. We got down to the flat and there was nobody but the body on the bed, we had to radio for the police from the van, and we couldn’t touch anything in the flat. As I say we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed, but I didn’t recognize him. I don’t know if any anybody would’ve recognized him. His own mother wouldn’t have recognized him. He was in a pool of vomit, it was everywhere.

    But we are not doctors and it’s our job to keep trying till we get them to the hospital. We can’t proclaim anyone dead…so as soon as the police arrived we were off. I was in the back with Jimi, Reg Jones drove. When we moved him the gasses were gurgling. You get that when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant. The vomit was all the way down. We couldn’t have got an airway down. He was flat on his back when we got there. It’s a shame he wasn’t on his side because he might have pulled through.

    Questions for John Saua:

    .

    Q: Did you sit Jimi up in the ambulance?

    A: Of course not, but I really kept on trying to do what I could for him even though we knew it was useless. I was really sorry there was nothing we could do to help.

    Q: Why have you never talked to the press or come forward?

    A: What do you mean come forward? I would never talk to the press, well you can’t in our job. We sign a conditions of service agreement. If we go into a building of national security, or a member of the royal family or a celebrity, we can’t talk about it, and quite right too. No one has ever asked me about it before anyway.

    {John was then shown the account in the bio “Electric Gypsy” regarding Jimi’s death.}

    A: Well that’s fiction isn’t it? What a load of old cobblers!

    Q: Don’t you remember this girl (Monika Dannemann)?

    A: No.

    Q: Surely you remember this girl. Blond hair and a German accent.

    A: Sorry, doesn’t jar anything or ring any bells with me.

    Q: Did you speak to anyone on your way to the hospital?

    A: Just the police before we left. A small crowd may have gathered. I can’t remember if some one asked what was happening, but you always get a crowd round an ambulance. It’s an unfortunate fact.

    Q: Did anyone ride along to the hospital with you?

    A: No, of course not, like who?

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Reg Jones was the other member of the ambulance crew who responded to a “possible O.D.” call at the 22 Landsowne crescent basement flat on the 18th of September 1970. He had worked for over 20 years as an ambulance man and has the highest reputation among his colleagues.

    Reg Jones’ Statement:

    Well it was horrific. We arrived at the flat and the door was flung wide open. Nobody about, just the body on the bed. He was covered in vomit. There was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was. His airways was completely blocked all the way down. His tongue had fallen back you see. The room at first was dark…we had to pull the curtains.

    Well we had to get the police. We only had an empty flat, so John Saua ran up and radioed and got the aspirator too. We felt for any pulse between his shoulders, pinched his earlobes and nose, showed a light in his eyes, but there was no response at all. I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. You get a feel for it, I can’t explain, but you do and I knew he was dead.

    Once the police arrived, which seemed like no time at all, we got him off to the hospital as quick as we could. We just kept trying. My shirt was wringing wet. The ambulances in them days, they wasn’t equipped like they are now. We had them crazy wadhams (a type of ambulance) in them days, awful they was.

    We took him to St. Mary Abbotts, they don’t have a casualty ward now, but in them days they did. That was our designated hospital for the day. There was a “bed state”* at St. Charles. You found out at the beginning of your shift what your designated hospital was – St. Mary’s was the designated that day.

    [*NOTE: A “bed state” meant that the casualty ward for a particular hospital was not open on a particular day – either through staffing or lack of beds, the designated hospital was the place the injured, or ill, would receive the fastest and most comprehensive care. Just to make sure the emergency services remembered, large highly visible colored disks were placed at the casualty entrance. Red was for closed and green meant open. St. Charles was marginally closer, but there was a “bed state” and, as Reg Jones said, St. Mary’s was the designated casualty ward that day.]

    Questions for Reg Jones:

    Q: Did any one come along in the Ambulance with you?

    A: No. John Saua was with Jimi, I didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix, bit out of my age group, luv. When we got him to the hospital, full lights and sirens, we had to clean the ambulance out, it was really a mess, his bowels and bladder, all that goes when you’re dead. That flat must have needed a good cleaning too.

    Q: Did you sit him up in the ambulance?

    A: Sit him up! No luv, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked. Them steps up the flat was steep, and you had a natural incline on the way up, but no, he wasn’t sat up.

    Q: Did you see or talk to anyone in the flat or on the way?

    A: Just the police and the hospital staff.

    Q: What about the German girl?

    A: What German Girl? We didn’t talk to no one but the police, and then at the hospital.

    Q: This is a bit confusing – look at this (shown the account in the “Electric Gypsy” bio:

    A: Well that’s just crazy that is. I wouldn’t know that girl if she was living next door to me. I’ve never seen her before. That’s wicked that is. I’ve lived long enough to know silly tongues will wag, but that is wicked. She wasn’t there, there was no one there.

    Q: Have you ever had a situation like this before or since?

    A: Well no, that’s why I can remember it quite well, just the body and no one around

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    • Good on you Scott. Now after absorbing what you wrote consider that the main European Hendrix archivist Caesar Glebbeek put out a publication in 2011 saying all this testimony is nonsense and that he had gathered the real facts. Glebbeek then offered some very clumsily put together retractions and reversals of these statements without any dates or verifying information to support them. It is very likely Glebbeek either fabricated those retractions or unquestioningly printed the retractions of people trying to cover up. It just goes to show what dunderheads the general Hendrix community are that they would not only fail to react to such treason from such a notable Hendrix source, but then go along with it in order to justify their indifference. I’ve never seen such a popular figure as Jimi with such cowardly idiotic fans. The epitome of this is the website Crosstown Torrents run by ex-Navy gun enthusiast Pat Peterson. The reason these people openly discourage the murder topic is because they are a bunch of degenerate scum who only seek to grab Jimi’s treasure by the easiest means while kicking Jimi himself out into the snow. It’s easy to detect scumbags who are only seeking that which confuses and makes uncertain for self-serving purposes of not caring, rather than seeking the just as easily-findable murder evidence. These people have succeeded in dominating the Hendrix community. You would be surprised who they are. Some of them are main names in the Hendrix world.

      This is a war, man. One that Jimi was fighting for the children of the world and you. If you come up on the wrong side of this beware because I’m going to come after you with a blade of truth and I promise you if you took sides against Jimi as a Hendrix person you are not going to fare well. To allow this farce of Hendrix fan stupidity and betrayal to exist unchallenged is a rogue insult to Jimi that must have justice done against it. Jimi never intended for his fans to be feckless morons who turned against himself and those defended him. Caesar has to pay for lying about the evidence and saying Jimi was stupid, as do those who accepted his betrayal and looked the other way. Anyone who looks at that testimony and doesn’t conclude Jimi was murdered is going after Jimi for his murderers and they have to be treated as such.

      • Quite correct. I’ve never seen a casualty in the last century smeared as badly as Jimi Hendrix. And a great majority of the people around him didn’t care.

  52. OK, here we go, Buster. Now’s the time for us to take the conversation to a new level for the new year.

    What I posted before was from Tony Brown’s book JIMI HENDRIX: THE FINAL DAYS (1997), and I copied it from Michael Fairchild’s rockprophecy site because my own photocopy of the book is at a drummer friend’s house. Everybody on this conversational thread needs to read Brown’s book and Kathy Etchingham’s THROUGH GYPSY EYES: MY LIFE, THE 60s, AND JIMI HENDRIX (1999).

    Today, however, we go to the heart of the matter.

    Most people in this conversation know that Monika Dannemann’s various stories about the last 24 hours of Jimi Hendrix are full of lies, untruths, and lots of misinformation. That said, I believe that she has slipped in some important facts in the book she wrote just before she supposed committed suicide, THE INNER WORLD OF JIMI HENDRIX (St. Martin’s Press, 1995). I not only read her book, but also photocopied large portions of it. It was Buster who directed me back to pp. 164-165, where we find the following passage:

    “Jimi had made up his mind that he was definitely going to break up with his manager. It was a difficult decision for him, especially as he knew that a lot of his unreleased music could fall into Mike Jeffery’s hands, which was exactly what he feared the most – that someone else would meddle with his music. So this decision was a real sacrifice for Jimi, as he was sure that Jeffery would alter some of his music to make it more commercial and marketable. However, having gone through such a long and difficult period with his manager – he had suffered threats, blocking of his new albums, and the creation of a false image through being told what to do and how to appear in public – Jimi felt this was the only way out of a disastrous situation. […] Jimi picked up the telephone and asked me to listen carefully to what he had to say to his lawyer, Henry Steingarten. He came straight to the point, telling his lawyer that he wanted to leave Jeffery for good, no mater what the cost might be. Steingarten, who was in partnership with Jeffery’s lawyer, asked Jimi if he had thought about the consequences, without making clear exactly what he meant by this. Jimi answered firmly that he had, and told his lawyer to proceed with his instruction.”

    If this is indeed true, as I intuitively believe it is, then we have a clear reason why Jefferey would have wanted to take vengeance.

    In their book HENDRIX: SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT (1992), Kramer and McDermott quote Bob Levine (pp. 287-288, quoted in one of my earlier posts above) saying”I had spoken to people who saw him at a party Track Records had staged in London the night before Hendrix died.”

    We also have the allegation revealed by James ‘Tappy’ Wright in his ROCK ROADIE (2010) that Jeffery told Wright he had had Hendrix killed, which Bob Levine and others vehemently deny.

    So now, let’s look at just these pieces of the puzzle:

    1. The statements of the ambulance drivers quoted by both Brown and Etchingham.

    2. The recent statements of both Tappy Wright (albeit made within the context of a jokey book full of purposely amusing anecdotes) about Jeffery’s confession, and Bannister’s recent statements regarding the amount of red wine found in Jimi’s lungs.

    3. Monika Dannemann’s narrative regarding Jimi firing Mike Jeffery as Manager.

    4. Bob Levine’s statements that Jeffery had been seen in London just before Jimi ‘died’, and that Jeffery had lied about not knowing that Jimi was dead (see my prior post quoting from the Kramer & McDermott book).

    These pieces of a puzzling situation indicate – at least to me – that we are not just dealing here with a wild conspiracy theory. Hendrix did have an FBI file, and that file is now public property and online. Jeffery was involved in the intelligence world. Eric Burdon, who obviously knows more than he has revealed, has told us plenty about Jeffery in his two autobiographies.

    I myself interviewed Buzzy Linhart (who plays vibes on “Drifting” and was a dear friend of Jimi) back in 2011, and Buzzy told me the same story about a person (whom Linhart would not name) who had overhead a conversation between Jeffery and Dannemann in the Electric Ladyland studio. I didn’t really know what to make of the story, and now I see from these posts that it may indeed have been Albert Allen who was sleeping on the couch.

    My intuition tells me that this is true, but that is all I can say.

    Buster, you and I have communicated on this material before, and you mentioned that you interview Wright and were disappointed. What is the status of the feud between Wright and Levine?

    It is my opinion, Ladies & Gentlemen, that if we take all these points into consideration and really look at all the available literature, we can easily come to the conclusion that JIMI HENDRIX DID NOT O.D. ON HEROIN. MONIKA WAS NOT IN THE ROOM WHEN THE AMBULANCE DRIVERS ARRIVED. NOR WAS ERIC BURDON. THERE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN A LARGE AMOUNT OF UNDIGESTED RED WINE IN JIMI’S LUNGS. JEFFERY WAS AT LEAST SEEN IN LONDON AT A TIME HE WAS SAID TO HAVE BEEN ELSEWHERE. JIMI ALLEGEDLY FIRED JEFFERY THE DAY HE ‘DIED’. ONE EMPLOYEE OF JEFFERY CLAIMS JEFFERY CONFESSED TO A MURDER.

    These points may or may not prove conclusively that Jimi Hendrix was murdered, but they are strong enough circumstantial evidence to make opening this investigation AN ABSOLUTE NECESSITY.

    Happy New Year all of you.
    And don’t forget to listen to Jimi Hendrix. His Spirit cannot die. It is here in his music, and it is here in the midst of those who are searching for the truth about why he was taken from us.

  53. I mean it’s pretty obvious already. If this evidence wasn’t proof enough alone the unaccountable lack of any reaction to it by the main witnesses should be.

    You need to read ‘Ghetto Fighters In Harlem World’ where Albert Allen recounts overhearing Monika and Jeffery at Electric Lady.

    Bob Levine is currently in a nursing home and should be left alone accordingly. There was never any real feud between Levine and Wright. They were amicable friends throughout that whole business. Just two sunshine boys covering their asses and protecting their Hendrix status. Smart researchers will figure out how they relate to the truth rather than trying to determine how their foolishness relates to the real story.

    I believe Jimi was assassinated by CIA under their COINTELPRO Program using Jeffery’s problems with Jimi to conceal the real motive. These are real pros. Don’t underestimate them.

  54. Can you surmise what part Eric Barrett and Gerry Stickells played in this ? Monika stated that they came to the apartment and immediately absconded all of Jimi’s telephone messages … hmmmm. Rather suspicious considering what just occurred , wouldn’t you say? Why would the phone messages interest them ? Perhaps they received orders from someone to remove the messages…

    • I must admit, I’m lost on that one regarding telephone messages. What kind of messages? One’s that were written down? Somehow recorded (I’m not sure how that basement flat telephone would have the capability).

      • Written on paper, sitting on a desk by the telephone. Being the busybody that she was, I’m sure that Monika “snooped” those messages but alas, that, as well as many other “intrigues ” have been buried with her.

    • Monika wrote in her book that Jimi told her to get the Samarkand hotel room in order to escape the office and that it was a secret hideaway designed to keep people from knowing where Jimi was. Typical of Monika she then wrote that Stickells and Barrett were looking for phone messages from the office in their clean-up. A good detective would notice right away that the clean-up at the Samarkand and its time period conformed to cleaning up a murder scene rather than a simple drug overdose.

      • “Typical of Monika she then wrote that Stickells and Barrett were looking for phone messages from the office in their clean-up”.

        She certainly blew her own cover out her butt with that one there. No doubt, Monika’s tongue has many of her own footprints on it — meaning she stepped on her own tongue repeatedly.

  55. You’re asking the right questions. A sharp observer would then ask why didn’t Scotland Yard since that is their business that they are trained in?

    • Buster, I have been researching Jimi’s death quite heavily in the past month or two, having been a Hendrix fanatic for years but always hesitantly accepting the Official Story that he overdosed and choked on his vomit accidentally, etc. I believe I have come across you in many different forums and comments sections and reviews across the net in my research (either that or it’s someone who talks and thinks exactly like you), and I first of all just want to say I really appreciate the research YOU have done into this tragedy and the passion and logic you apply when detailing what likely happened on that September night. It may seem strange that I have found so many of your posts just like that, but that points to one of the sad things about this all, which is that hardly anyone seems to be talking about it! Hardly anyone, even the biggest supposed fans of Jimi, will even grant the possibility that he may have been murdered. So in searching the net for some actual analysis and discussion I have invariably come across your insights, and I want to thank you for igniting my own passion in perhaps finding the truth in this mysterious labyrinth of propaganda, well-meaning fluff, half-lies, full-on lies, ignorance, dismissal, ad hominems and generally, silence. The silence is the saddest part.

      Having said that, I do not 100% believe he was murdered, or murdered by Jeffrey; rather, I very strongly suspect it. I keep my mind open to the possibility it was an overdose or accident of some sort or even possibly suicide (though I hate when people argue for this, as it defames a dead man)… but the more I read, the more likely it seems that Jimi was murdered. The more I read, the more sinister the whole last year of his life (or more) seems. As if there was a black cloud hovering above him wherever he went, except this fanciful metaphor had some very real, very human and very dangerous faces to it. And the more I read, the more ominous and overwhelmingly tragic and poignant Jimi’s final recordings seem; Cry of Love in particular is dripping with sadness.

      Anyway, one thing I’ve been pondering is the whole MSG incident on 1/28/70. There is full audio of the performance and it’s dispiriting and almost scary the way everything goes wrong, the way Jimi offends the audience with a surreal insult about blood-stained panties, the way both songs the band attempt playing seem to be slipping away from them, from Jimi, as they play, as if he couldn’t keep up with it. He seems very much on a bad trip. But is Buddy Miles’s suggestion that Jeffrey dosed Hendrix purposefully credible? Or, if that’s true, how would Jeffrey know the acid was “bad” or would have a negative effect? It certainly was an easy way to break up the BOG, of course, if that’s what happened.

      “That’s what happens when Earth fucks with space — never forget that,” Jimi said before he left the stage. Now, this may sound like just some meaningless acid insight, but I don’t think it is. I feel there is meaning here; he sounds angry or disappointed beyond just being frazzled because of some overpowering LSD giving him bad vibes. It sounds like there’s one thing or person in particular (Earth?) that’s fuckin’ with him (space?) and, like oil and water, the combination just won’t do. The alchemical magic he needed to produce that extraterrestrial galactic sky church music was missing, but was Jimi referring to the music itself — to Buddy Miles’s earthy locked-in drumming and increasingly intrusive singing/role in the band — or to Jeffrey, or possible others? I believe there is meaning in that elusive statement and I believe that fateful night is related to the last show he ever did, the ironically titled Love & Peace Festival in Fehmarn, Germany, where poor Billy Cox himself was spiked with acid. In both cases, someone was pulling strings, trying to stop the show, Earth fuckin’ with space again. If we can say with any certainty who that person was (and it seems fairly likely it was Jeffrey) then we’ll be one very small step closer to justice for Jimi. Either that or I’m up one of many blind alleys. But I felt like writing something to release the giant weight that’s built up on me since researching and reading of the true details of Jimi’s death — this incredible person, whom I basically idolized as a teen, and still hold in the highest regard, did not die a tragic but predictable death due to his own human folly, but had his life cut short due to the malicious intent of some other(s). This realization opened my eyes and broke my heart, and I hope we will get more answers in our lifetimes as to who may have been involved.

      • Oh, and I just want to add: It’s rather obvious (to some people anyway), but the amount of premature deaths of people close to Hendrix at the time of his death is suspicious and damning in and of itself. Devon Wilson, Michael Jeffrey, Chas Chandler, Monika Danneman… (Am I forgetting somebody?) Those three alone are very telling, especially the circumstances of their deaths.

        I also find it unusual that Noel Redding, Mitch Mitchell and Buddy Miles have all passed away too, at unusually young ages (the latter two even dying in the same year, which was a real blow). I won’t say I suspect there was foul play or anything (though neither would I *completely* rule it out), but I just find it unusual that almost all of the people closest to Jimi have died far before their time. Sadly, one of the Aleem brothers who were so close to Jimi, Tunde Ra, died last year. Even Larry Lee of the Gypsy Sun & Rainbows passed in his sixties in 2007. Billy Cox is almost the “last man standing,” especially musically. It’s almost easier to name the people close to Jimi who ARE alive than those who aren’t. Eric Burdon, Kathy Etchingham (god bless her), Juma Sultan, Jerry Velez, Taharqa Aleem, etc.

        Anyway, just idle rambling on my part. By the way, I sat right next to Mitch Mitchell at a little restaurant in France sometime in 2005 or 2006 and I’m still kicking myself for not trying to talk to him…

      • Hello Night Bird,

        I’ve also been studying this case for nearly seven years. In my judgement, especially after reading the Aleem Twins book “Ghetto Fighters in Harlem World”, there just isn’t any other possible deduction other than homicide in the Jimi Hendrix death case.

        TaharQa Aleem (Albert Allen) caught both Mike Jeffery & Monika Dannemann red-handed with their hands in the cookie jar in Jeffery’s office shortly after Jimi died.

        Too many people have incriminatingly shut-up or lied about that morning/day when Jimi died.

        Dr. Bannister is telling the truth. In over 40 years, nobody has provided any substantial proof to overturn his testimonial witnessing. Bannister spent nearly a half hour suctioning fluid that was mostly red wine from Hendrix’s stomach and lungs.

        You cannot have large quantities of red wine in the stomach and lungs and a blood alcohol content of 0.005%, while having enough barbitural content to sedate African big game at the same time. It just isn’t possible for that to be anything other than homicide.

        The coroner, Gavin Thurston, told UPI representative, Jack Meehan on Sept. 29, 1970, regarding Jimi’s stomach contents, that “a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed” (this is in Sharon Lawrence book ‘Betrayal’). So you see, the Inquest did know about the red wine, but kept it hush-hush, because they knew it signified foul play.

  56. Thanks Night Bird. Truthfully I have been questioning God and reality over this since the dead silent lack of reaction to this is somewhat disturbing and shakes my previous concept of reality. When the Jews were viciously persecuted by the Nazis at least they were liberated. This cause is like the Nazis being allowed to finish the job with full consent. If you want to understand what the recent black protesters are protesting against just consider that Jimi’s blackness is most likely what keeps this obvious horrendous case from being acted upon. It’s crazy but Jimi proves that no matter how famous you are if you are black you are as good as any lynched N***** and better accept that. That’s an evil that needs to be broken. It’s hard enough to expose CIA murders to begin with. Jimi had the unfortunate stars to be holding all aces. But that sort of defines Jimi’s magic doesn’t it?

    Yeah, I get zero response to my reviews. I’m treated like a neighbor who comes to the party and tries to convince everyone of the wonders of communism and to sign up. Nothing but vacant stares in return from the Philistines. This is the playing field Jimi and his advocates face against cold stone-walled governments and their corrupted justice systems. What gets to me the most is some of these pompous phonies who are the main Hendrix voices of today who don’t even have this on their radar. I could name names but I won’t. In any case some of those phonies obviously actively avoid the murder subject as if it were taboo. That just goes to show how little respect they have for Jimi. Some of them are dumb enough to say their ignoring Jimi’s murder is showing respect for him. I was kicked off the main Hendrix website Crosstown Torrents by an 18 year old British coward named “Fender’s Fingers” for defending Jimi. That site welcomes and protects some very evil scum who attack the murder evidence with the full approval of obnoxious moderators who bombastically cite site rules they make up as they go along while trolling serious posts about Jimi’s murder. After using the cowardly method of banning they then safely pronounce themselves the best of the Hendrix world.

    Night Bird, Jimi was definitely, undoubtably murdered. If you read my writings you’ll see that we’ve disproven any accidental death on a forensic basis. If you are still considering other causes you haven’t researched enough. There’s no accidental death scenario anyone can present that I can’t disprove with the real facts. That leaves the only other option, which is murder. I suggest you study up on the US government’s COINTELPRO Program to understand the true context of Jimi’s death and, more importantly, the scofflaw refusal of the British government to honestly recognize the evidence or assert the due process they are sworn to.

    You show a good understanding of Jimi in your sensitivity to his sound in those final months. Jimi was in effect playing his own funeral music in a haunting way that fit his supernatural awareness,

    What people don’t understand is Jeffery was an intel agent. Such a person is like a mafia member. They never leave the outfit and are always prone to service without any choice. Jimi was given a LSD mickey for the Viet Nam War Memorial Concert because that was exactly what CIA was worried about with their anti-messiah program. Jeffery wanted Jimi to remain a non-political musician he could control and profit off of. Jimi launching an all-black band in an anti war concert is something that was CIA’s worst nightmare. This stuff isn’t rocket science and it puts into proper context the rest of what happened to Jimi. The pompous Hendrix experts who ignore this are just pathetic cowards. History will record their abandonment of Jimi and leaving him to the wolves. And, yes, this pattern was repeated with Billy. It is as obvious as it looks. You are seeing the dirty fingerprint of intel there. The same bastards that weren’t afraid to violate Billy like that were the same bastards who weren’t afraid to murder Jimi. COINTELPRO.

    Jimi’s death is quite Christian because he, like Jesus, suffered a complete betrayal by all those who were close to him and still does even today. This moral magnetism defines Jimi and his central mystery. The system had to murder what he stood for.

    I’m lucky to have met Mitch and Noel at the same time and had a private chat with them. You should have introduced yourself to Mitch. He was a good bloke. Unfortunately it is my theory that Mitch, Noel, and Chas all shortened their lives through bad habits that were partly motivated by their guilt over what they knew really happened to Jimi. If that was helped along by the same evil bastards that killed Jimi I don’t know. But it would fit a known pattern of their killing of witnesses.

    Night Bird. The CIA murdered Jimi Hendrix. If you do the right research like I have you’ll come to that same unavoidable conclusion. It’s even possible they murdered Jeffery too. Americans sell themselves as a brave people who fight hard for democracy but the truth is what they really are is a people who can be depended upon to stand by and do nothing while their heroes are slaughtered by the real Nazis who run our government. America is a lie. A bright shining stinking lie.

    • Thanks, Buster and Flyswatter, for the insightful responses.

      I have this thing I do sometimes, it’s kind of wrongheaded, but it’s that I keep my mind open to the possibility that the sky is green even when all evidence suggests blue. So, what I mean is, ultimately I do agree that Jimi was murdered. The other factor in my hesitancy, especially initially, is how crushingly sad and heartbreaking Jimi and his life becomes when one realizes the sinister overtones of those last couple years with Jeffrey, as well as Chalpin, Danneman, countless “hangers-on,” uh, the US government, and even his own money-grubbing father surrounding him like hungry vultures over a still-living person. When I read enough evidence to realize that Hendrix did not die accidentally or of his own accord, it fucking Killed me, man. I suspect that’s why there’s so many Hendrix fans who have this knee-jerk dismissal of the possibility of his murder — it’s simply too sad, too “heavy,” too much reality, for them to bear, and they’d rather just retreat back into their safe little fan-worship cocoons, unaware that REAL “fans” or supporters of Jimi would cry for justice or at least a deeper look into the happenings of that night instead of accepting the usual Danneman lies and rock-star-burnout/27-club lies and cliches.

      Of course, a lot of these Hendrix fans are not well-meaning, as you know, Buster, and they may never accept the truth simply because they dismiss anything diverging from the propaganda ingrained in them as “conspiracy theory nonsense” or whatever (from what I’ve read on the CTT forum, the so-called discussion of Jimi’s death points this way most of the time, and is just incredibly close-minded and fascist in the most repulsive way). But some fans are good people who have a heart and soul and will accept the truth eventually, it’s just that they have a strong emotional reaction to this idea, which seems so alien and wrong to them after years of conditioning to believe in his overdose or suicide. I’ve seen at least a few people like this actually turn around and accept the murder scenario with just a few paragraphs of well-researched insight. (And by the way, I was re-reading the article posted in italics that we’re all commenting on, and I think it may be the best single piece to show to the skeptics and the overdose/suicide believers; not that it’s better than a few of the best books on the subject, but because it condenses almost all the truth of the matter into a relatively short passage, and so is good for convincing in these ADD-riddled times when one can’t always except people to seek out Tony Brown’s book or whatever).

      Speaking of books, I’ve just ordered Ghetto Fighters in Harlem World and look forward to reading. I also have Danneman’s Inner World book on the way, but I as much look forward to as dread and fear that thing. She exudes some kind of evil that I can’t explain in words precisely; but for example, just watching the interview with her in the “Mugshots” doc from the 90s on Hendrix’s death creeped me out, the drugged, hypnotic way she speaks and the fussed-over, faux-elegant sheen of her dress, some purple or blue velvet thing with a giant crucifix affixed to it. Her interview with Sharon Lawrence when they first met right after Jimi’s death is enough to make one cry and scream at the same time… all the evasions, the phony-crying at a key point yet complete lack of emotion shown in the rest of the interview, the way she seems so happy about her paintings and how Jimi loved them and her and how totally undisturbed she seems about what just happened hours before. Creepy, eerie stuff.

      Buster, again I just want to say how much I applaud your tenaciousness and quest for justice and truth, and I honestly think that I’m not being too optimistic in saying that sometime in the next decade this whole thing will explode and reach a wider audience, and we all won’t be on the fringes anymore. These things take time and hard-won acceptance of some very dispiriting facts, but this is one of those cases where the facts are so obvious to anyone looking that the liars (like Cross, Danneman, Glebeek, etc) are looking increasingly suspect even to the simplest layman. That’s what helps me sleep at night, anyway.

  57. It’s not as innocent as that Night Bird. The Hendrix community at this point is dominated by egos who have been in the business long enough to stake a place on the internet. The motive of those people might be partly what you say, but for anyone in the game long enough as they’ve been there’s no excuse for not catching on to these obvious facts. What gives them away is they are smart enough to become the main archivists and purveyors of Hendrix information and websites. Some of the posts of those Crosstown members show serious ability and intelligence. I assure you those members are not innocently shocked and in denial. They are persons who are very much aware Jimi was murdered. They have just found whatever reason compels them to not discuss it. For some it will be their personal background where they consider it dangerous to make themselves vulnerable by discussing it. Some are just of the personality that they aren’t capable of detecting or admitting covert intrigue. Some have right-wing leanings and don’t allow for government wrongdoing by predetermined mentality. Some, that I’m sure you’re aware of, are just too plain fucking stupid to understand. The simplest way to put it is the main motivation of those scum is that Jimi is dead, he’s left a rich treasure that can be plucked and traded by those who appreciate it, and risking your neck, or being made uncomfortable by recognizing the evidence, is something those scum don’t have to do. Think of them as pirates not wanting to draw heat on their MP-3 grabbing and you’ll be close to understanding them. They are like spiders who suck the talent and music out of their object of interest Jimi Hendrix but then cast his desiccated shell out to the curb when it comes to taking responsibility for Jimi himself. Those people are scum. There’s no excuse for them. May they be damned. May they be the ones to choke on Hendrix.

    My particular interest are those members who are government agents. I suspect Charles Cross is one of those people. Like some of the Crosstown members, he has too much knowledge and ability to be so dumb about the murder evidence. He also inserts a suggestion that gives his devious purpose away. He wrote that Monika may have taken a Vesparax at 4am and slept through the whole choking on vomit event. When I read that I realized that was a deliberate device Cross used in order to avoid detailing what actually did happen after 4am. This is evidence of deliberate deceit in my mind, which means Cross purposely misled the public in his book about how Jimi died. So did reporter Sharon Lawrence. If you read about CIA in the 1960’s they openly admitted infiltrating the US media in order to spin events their way. Of the two reporters who wrote about Jimi’s death both of them gave provably false information leading the readers away from any murder conclusion. To me this confirms CIA involvement in Jimi’s murder. They wouldn’t be trying to cover it up so badly 40 years later if that weren’t so. However smart people will see the murder method was strictly an intel black bag job. No doubt about it. Covert murder using drugs and alcohol to mimic a reckless drug abuse death.

    I don’t give credit to the London Times for anything, including this article. I couldn’t find it on Google but when Kathy Etchingham’s petition came out the Times did a nasty mocking article asking why would Kathy be doing this? Was she bored or seeking attention because her one claim to fame was receding into the past? The Times ripped her as being a Miss Marple going over her head with some kind of crazy publicity stunt. This Times article by Dominic Wells should be viewed for what it is. It is the cowardly, indirect confession of an institution that helped cover this up with its original non-interest, and, therefore, complicity. It is the false priests of the high media giving faux recognition by means of pretend analysis when the truth is they knew the whole time. In short, the Philistine press pawing its prey with half admissions and phony pondering. The public gets conditioned by this false press into not realizing that they are the institutions that were supposed to discover and investigate all this business back then. When they snuggle up to you with half hearted efforts like this they should be strongly reminded of that. Even this article doesn’t offer all it could. But that’s understandable because the more they offered the more obvious it would become that they didn’t investigate originally.

    As for Monika, read what I wrote here and figure out how she fits in to all this and see if that white witch in elegant dress doesn’t perfectly match. Monika is a very complex person forced to stay in character in the middle of a brightly lit stage for the rest of her life. She exited when the real plot was about to be exposed.

  58. I am 30 years oId and i recently I began playing guitar and I was looking at different players for inspiration david gilmore, richie blackmore and of course Jimi Hendrix. i knew his more well known songs but was never a real follower of his music. Then the more I began watching and listening to him the more I became a fan of his music. I then started to want find anything I could on jimi especially any interviews on him because I felt he had this kind of magnetic effect that would draw you in to anything he would say. In any interview he had a real vulnerability about him huge shyness even childlike persona as in the video of him playing 12 string blues impossible to think that could be the same man capable of what he was doing with a piece of wood and some strings. Then you watch him play an there was no shyness no weakness or vulnerability, he was centre of the universe he was in total control he was all powerful.
    This all added to the intrigue and interest to learn more and at the time made his death seem to only add to his mystique and fame and of course he had to die in real rock and roll style.
    Then I came across a documentary on his last 24 hours. At times I wish I never had.
    At the end of that documentary I felt sick, I wanted to vomit and now unfortunately my attention has gone from listening to him play, admiring his skill and ability to now finding out anything I can on his murder and after months of searching I have found “buster” his knowledge and comprehension on all events surrounding his murder is unrivalled. I’ve read this page from top to bottom a dozen times now.
    Buster you dont need to say anymore. Energy should be focused now on how something can be done to bring justice and peace to jimi and re-write the history books to show the truth.

  59. Thanks Daniel. Only the best Hendrix fans end up at this watering hole. It’s the wellhead spring of Jimi’s cosmic oracle. The litmus test for a true Hendrix fan is how he treats his murder. Only those who fully appreciate what Jimi was see the pressing moral imperative and biblical dilemma involved in putting the true definition of his life and mission right. If you understand Jimi it’s no exaggeration to speak in those terms.

    The reason it is biblical is because Jimi embodied and aimed towards that level with his talent and mission. When you get as close to the tone and vibe of that radiating ball of light at the center of the universe it doesn’t really need to be spelled-out in detail does it? Jimi cracks me up because he has a gentlemanly tolerance for people who don’t get this in interviews. It’s really why we are talking about him. Sure enough the same pathetic people show up and deny this aspect just like Judas in the bible. The level of ignorance, stupidity, and cowardice it attracts is disgusting and pathetic just like the bible. Some of Jimi’s friends also fail to see this and do their best not to help. They are only failing Jimi, whatever their justification. Then you have the evil main Judas Caesar Glebbeek who after making his living selling Jimi for decades turned around and campaigned for his murderers by attacking the murder evidence. The scum who follow him enforce silence on the topic on their websites. Those people sell themselves as the best Hendrix fans but they are actually the worst. They are fools who Jimi would be disgusted by and reject. They blindly miss this most important aspect of Jimi while hoarding his treasure and persecuting people who recognize and respond to it. A good toilet-flushing of the Crosstown Torrents website would probably hermetically excise this abomination from the Hendrix universe leaving the credible side intact. They are the world. Jimi was the sky.

    Anyway, thanks. I was beginning to think it was just me. That of course would be no problem because you’ll find me a deft swordsman in defense of Jimi who has already left an oracle midden of defeated fools who were dumb enough to take me on on this. The bogus Hendrix world is now focused towards enforcing silence and coordinating an ignoring of the subject, but it won’t save them. In any case, as you say, the task is now a government big game safari with me being a world class Serengeti hunter who is very enthusiastic about being given the privilege to defend rock’s fallen prince. I’ve pulled a sword out of a rock that was meant for me. I fully intend to apply it as was its purpose. Cowards beware…

  60. It’s not you Buster, you’re about as switched on as it comes with regards to this matter. Seems like Crosstowntorrents is having major hassles, I tried to login last night to troll the site and it seems they are having some “server side” problems, and today, it’s totally not available at all, page does not exist, and probably, rightfully so should forever. A quick check of their FB page confirms it was not just my problem (tried several browsers)…

    Paul Metcalfe why has my account been suspende, can`t understand why
    May 31 at 3:37pm

    David Fairweather I don’t think its you. I think CTT has been “suspended” by its ISP.
    1 · May 31 at 4:15pm

    Tom Gomprecht This is sad news. Hopefully just a temporary situation.
    June 1 at 5:26am

    Paul Metcalfe tried to download but got the message illegal string off set in path line 6570 header already sent, anyone know what this means
    June 1 at 12:52pm

    Paul Metcalfe wish to hell someone would fix this site
    See Translation
    11 Июнь в 15:48

    Paul Metcalfe cant understand why there advertising this site when you cant get on crosstown torrents stupid

    Good riddance forever….(hopefully)
    They’ll probably be back though.

  61. Crosstown regulars can post. That site is an inclusive club of friends with a narrow aggressive agenda to be the best experts and collectors. What it really is is a toxic insider’s private site that can’t allow the public because it would become clear that they have a dark agenda. It’s a travesty because Jimi would never approve of such a site, let alone it being the only major Hendrix website on the internet. It seems Jimi has a curse on him that whoever runs him ends up committing these offenses.

    Anyhow, the site is run by mid-westerner and ex-Navy man Pat Peterson who doesn’t feel any need to account for all this. I don’t know if he censors the murder topic in loyalty to the military authorities he once served or if he is just an incompetent administrator who really doesn’t give a flying f about Jimi himself. Those Crosstown people obviously don’t care about Jimi and put themselves and their scummy group above Jimi himself as long as they are in control. Its purpose is trading MP-3 files of Jimi’s music. So its first motive is piracy and not reverent respect for Jimi and his fate. He’s basically traded like a commodity (a slave) and standing up for him only interferes with that. The site is run by cowards and really shouldn’t be allowed to exist. It also harbors a majority of brits who get away with imposing the denialist British viewpoint on Jimi’s murder as well as the accepted form of outright censorship commonly accepted in Britain on an American site.

    Pat Peterson is a real hero. His Facebook page lists gun nut websites as some of his favorite links. Should this person be running the internet’s only Hendrix website?

    • A resounding no to that question. With you all the way on the gun nut thing, no wonder the US has 30,000 gun murders a year, where-as in my old home country, Australia, we have about 300 gun murders a year, that means it takes Australia 100 years to rack up the same number of gun deaths America racks up in ONE year!!! (even if you factor in the population difference, it would take Oz roughly 10 years to rack up one year’s worth of gun murders in the USA).

      I’m sure PP is very proud of himself, like the late Charlton Heston was. A bunch of school kids get shot up at school, what do these fools do ? They go and buy MORE GUNS!!! That’s the answer!

      That’s a pretty f’d up society, on that aspect alone. Throw WASPs into the mix with the gun nuts and you have something akin to insanity.

      These people should not be running anything, let alone the internets premier site for JH…

    • When trying to register a new account today on CTT…

      “Sorry, registration has been disabled by the administrator.”

      Bunch of sycophants, bowing to PP, secure in their contrived insular world!

  62. They don’t give a damn about Jimi they just want to loot his treasure. The moderators openly troll serious efforts to show the evidence for Jimi’s murder and promote lying scum like STPLSD, Purple Jim, and many others in order to enforce the moronic level Crosstown Torrents prefers. Smelling their own smell they have now backed in to a private site mode not offering any membership to the public. It’s easier to protect their Judas-like betrayal of Jimi and actively fighting for his murderers that way. Purple Jim, Fender’s Fingers, and STPLSD are all brits. They don’t want to admit Jimi was murdered in their own country by one of their own intelligence agents and covered up by their own government so they troll instead while openly ignoring the evidence. The consensus on that site was Caesar was the final word and did a good job.

  63. Buster , proof positive of what you have been saying….the British are in denial that Jimi was murder on her land. This thread from Facebook shows , again, what you have been saying about the British refusing to acknowledge forensic evidence. Read Limey Rob Moss’ comments from the the post made by “Brian Jones” under the Jimi/Jeffery
    photo
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/352788294759757/?fref=nf

  64. Dear Buster / guys

    I’ve been familiar with Hendrix and his music for many years but only comparatively recently with the murder theories. At first I confess that I was sceptica, but having researched the key documentary and forensic evidence it’s obvious that the guy was murdered. I am actually a professional trained historian and therefore used to analysing political events through evidence and intuition, and for me there is little doubt what happened on 18th September 1970 at the Hotel Samarkand or who was responsible. I would like to see this case reopened and properly investigated by the authorities. How do we achieve this? How can I help?

  65. Pingback: What Killed Jimi Hendrix | Opiaka4

  66. I recently spoke with Bob Levine in person in his nursing home. He’s in reasonably good shape for an 87 year old man. He was glad to see me and I am probably his most active friend right now. Bob excoriated Caesar Glebbeek and said he never met him, spoke to him, or was interviewed by him. I informed Bob that Caesar had brought his summation, in his disinformation work ‘Until We Meet Again’, to the highlighted quote: “If you don’t believe me listen to Jimi Hendrix manager Bob Levine” and he followed with some cherry-picked quotes from Bob saying the murder theories were all bullshit and Jimi wasn’t murdered. Bob responded by emphasizing he never consented for Caesar to quote him that way and that “Caesar was a well-known bullshit-artist who was known to do that to other people too.”

    This interview was the culmination of my phoning Bob and visiting him several times at his house since Caesar’s 2011 publication. I even slept over and helped him with his meds since his vision problems made knowing which meds were which important. In these visits and calls I had explained the evidence to Bob and informed him of things he wasn’t aware of. He had come around and told me he thought that actually maybe Jimi was murdered and I should take my evidence to the FBI. I had to tell Bob FBI wasn’t such a good idea since they were probably involved.

    But I’ve got Bob Levine on video saying he didn’t give Caesar permission to quote him that way and Caesar was known for that kind of dirty trick. He then added, in order to set the record straight, that he now believes Jimi could have been murdered. I also have him saying Michael Jeffery got karma when he crashed. As in karma for murdering Jimi.

    So much for Caesar being the final say as the morons on Crosstown proclaimed as they banned me. Though I do agree with Caesar – listen to Bob Levine…

    • Yes indeed, the truth is going to overtake these liar-deniars like Glebbeek, just like it did Monika Dannemann. Some dummies don’t learn from history & Glebbeek is obviously one of those people.

      • Caesar is an arrogant ass. He thinks his Hendrix expertise gives him the right to pronounce lies over the top of others trying to tell the truth. He simply thinks his Hendrix information background gives him the credibility to lie in public and deliberately sell distorted information and deceptive avoidance of the truth in his Hendrix death publication ‘Until We Meet Again’. And the Hendrix public doesn’t raise a peep and credits him for it. Caesar is a vicious betrayer of Jimi Hendrix who made money from his Hendrix-centered UniVibes magazine for decades and then turned around and sold Jimi to the devil and his murderers in ‘Until We Meet Again. Caesar has committed an act equal to Judas Iscariot and must be made to pay an appropriate price by those few decent fans of intelligent moral integrity who still defend and care about Jimi instead of fecklessly making it easier for themselves to enjoy his treasure while leaving Jimi in the gutter as far as his murder. May those fans share the same fate as Caesar and may I be the one who makes that happen. The reason you don’t see Caesar out defending ‘Until We Meet Again’ is because that pig knows he got caught selling a pack of lies against Jimi.

      • In a nutshell, all that “Until We Meet Again” trashheap publication is really telling anyone is that Monika Dannamann pissed on Caesar’s head and told him it was raining, and Caesar to this day still wants to believe it is raining because it was Monika that was doing the urinating.

  67. Here is the final nail in the coffin for Caesar Glebbeek’s disinformation work ‘Until We Meet Again’. Glebbeek wrote the work in a way that led up to the quote: “If you don’t believe me listen to Jimi’s manager Bob Levine”. Caesar then quoted Bob saying the murder theories were all bs. Here is what Bob really thinks:

  68. The liars at Crosstown Torrents are over there safely protected by their cowardly banning and censorship ignoring what is being said in this video. Instead they re-posted Bob’s saying Tappy’s book was bullshit in the Daily News. However if they are going to hold Bob to his prior quotes they should re-post his earliest words in McDermott’s 1992 book ‘Setting The Record Straight’ where he listed numerous incriminating incidents that drew his suspicion over Jeffery’s involvement in Jimi’s death. It is obvious that the moderator Fenders Fingers is posting Bob’s Daily News quote because he literally can’t address the unavoidable significance of what this video undoubtedly shows. There’s no doubt that it shows, contrary to what Glebbeek was saying, that Bob actually does believe Jimi was murdered and that Caesar took liberties and misreported the truth. Crosstown is desperate to avoid what Bob is saying here because they heavily banked on Caesar’s disinformation work ‘Until We Meet Again’ and any concession that it isn’t credible will lead directly to Crosstown not being credible itself, so they have to avoid it at all costs.

    The poster “STPLSD” (a crass denier and troll) even has the balls to suggest Bob wasn’t exactly enthusiastically endorsing the murder claim in this video. This is typical of the backwards deceit Crosstown practices. It is more than obvious from watching this video that the real issue here is Bob doesn’t exactly enthusiastically endorse the “murder claims are all bs” quote that Caesar so dishonestly presented against what Bob really thinks, as it is shown in this video. What part of “I have suspicion, I don’t have proof, but I have suspicion” do STPLSD and the punkish deniers at Crosstown fail to understand or how that diametrically conflicts with Caesar’s misleading “If you don’t believe me listen to Jimi’s manager Bob Levine”? Apparently, for Crosstown and Caesar, Bob is worth quoting up to the point that he says the opposite of what they want to believe. Then they pull their usual dirty tricks, just like they do with all the other evidence. I think that’s what Bob is really saying here…

  69. Pingback: Were they just… done? – rememberthe27

  70. My good friend and Hendrix manager Bob Levine passed away sometime during the summer of 2016. The nursing home would not release any details so I’m working on finding the date. Bob reveals in the video above that he believed Jimi was murdered. Bless you Bob…

  71. Buster, have you read the book “Drugs As a Weapon Against Us ” by John Potash ? It delves into the intelligence ops’ involvement in the murders of Jimi, Brian Jones, Bob Marley, John Lennon, Kurt Cobain , etc. Also the attempted assassination of Mick Jagger. Also, how the Grateful Dead were used as ops to spread the drug culture to the youth for the purpose of mind control.Also it discusses in depth the unusually high number of musicians that achieved fame that happened to be children of high ranking military parents.

  72. I spoke to Potash on the phone a couple of years ago…He’s on the right track, however his research and thesis spreads in to the broader subject of Intel social control…Mae Brussel also pushed that track heavily…It is hard to figure out where Intel influence ends and kids just being in to the incredible mesmerizing drug LSD begins some times…Books like Constantine’s and Potash’s are good but they tend to be too broad and miss the more precise reasons for Jimi’s murder…We finally beat Crosstown Torrents in a debate on Facebook…Their reaction was to have their head bully STPLSD stand up and order people to ignore our evidence…And the idiots on that site obeyed…This is all OK with the owner Pat Peterson who told us to pay for our own website if we wanted to talk about Jimi’s murder (Pat never answered how kicking the people in best possession of the facts behind Jimi’s death off his website worked for Jimi and his interests)…Crosstown isn’t interested in the truth…

  73. “Fender’s Fingers” – the bastard moderator on Crosstown Torrents who bans anyone who posts the facts about Jimi’s murder is a British man named Gordon Johnson…He’s a brit connected to the British Hendrix publication ‘Jimpress’…He boots anyone who posts the truth on Jimi’s murder off Crosstown Torrents because the British don’t want to admit Jimi was killed by one of their own intelligence agents and it was covered-up by their government…The curmudgeon murder denier “STPLSD” on the same site is another Britisher named “Renwick McNeil”…The Crosstown Torrents owner Pat Peterson is an ex Navy neo-con from Illinois who allows this sick situation to rule on the internet’s only Hendrix website…

  74. Hi Everybody.. I Am a Life Long Jimi Fan And a Music Artist..Guitrist(And Other Instruments)Singer/Songwriter in My Own Right. I Am Not Going to Write a Chapter Here..But What I Am Going to Do is Point Out The 5 Irrefutable Facts That Very Strongly Point to Mike’s Guilt and Monica’s Guilt and/or Knowledge Thereof of Mike’s Guilt and Her Complicity…And They are 1.(Which is Very Unbelievably Being Overlooked) Approx.a Year Before Jimi’s Death on Sept 18th 1970 Mike Had Jimi Kidnapped (Most Likely to Scare Jimi into Doing Things His Way or Else (Something Much More Drastic Would Happen To Him if Didn’t) and as We All Know History Has Proven That Something Did Indeed Happen To Him. 2. Mike’s Devulging of The Fact That Jimi In Fact was Drowned with Red Wine (Something That Was Never Surmised or Made Public Until Decades Later and Only The Killer or Someone With First Hand Knowledge From The Killer Could Have Known) 3.The Fact That Jimi in Fact Did Plan on Severing Ties With Mike as His Management and There was a 2 Million Dollar Life Insurance Policy on Jimi’s Life and All of The Studio Recordings Jimi Had Finished (Or Partly Finished) in Various Vaults Around The World Made Jimi By No Stretch of The Imagination Worth More To Mike Desd Then Alive 4. That Monica Basically Dedicated Her Life to Jimi in The Form of Painted Art Works (That I Must Say are Damm Good and Very Impressive) Which to Me (IMO) Symbolizes a Strange Type of Martyrdom Probably Out of Guilt. And Lastly Number 5.Monica’s Eventual Suicide (Again Out of Guilt That Obviously Overtook Her By That Time in Her Life) .. And There as They Say Folks You Have it. So Yess..Mike Jeffries Did Murder or Was Responsible for The Murder Of Jimi Hendrix Beyond The Shadow of All Doubt. And R.I.P. Jimi My Most Amazing Musical Brotha for Now The Horrible Truth of The Facts Pretaining to Your Most Unfortunate Death Have Finally Been Unmasked and Revealed.

    • It is sad that the rate of agreement on this subject is one poster every 4 years or so…Most of what you write is the commonly assumed evidence…Doubters would say there is no proof that Jeffery told Tappy about the wine, but as a personal close friend of Tappy’s who called him regularly for the 5 years before his death, I can say if Jeffery didn’t tell him directly someone else who he couldn’t mention did…Your most keen observation is Monika’s weird profile because of her painting and monk-like dedication to Jimi…Only the most observant realize this shows serious psychological profile evidence toward Monika’s true role…What I have concluded is that Monika was dragged in to the plot because she was an active CIA asset who was somehow induced to do it but then had sympathy with her victim afterwards…If you can grasp this and its significance, Monika may not have committed suicide…Either way, suicide or not, it was directly related to her role in Jimi’s death and is equally incriminating either way…One of the biggest give-aways is Scotland Yard not being interested in this glaring evidence – which, for more aware observers, tells you who really did it and why…I also believe Jeffery’s death was not an accident and then we are through the looking glass on the level of involvement and motives, aren’t we?

  75. ..And Just To Twist The Knife Here… Isn’t it Strangely Profound That After Mike Revealing The Truth to Someone (Anyone) On This Planet With His Own Lips Did He Myseriously Die in The Plane Crash Very Sortly After The Disclosure as If The Creator Said….And Now I Can Take His Evilass Out of This World…..Which Brings to Mind The Good Ole Adage…Karma’s a Bitch… (It Certainly Is…Isn’t It ??? )

      • Where is the Karma for the majority of Hendrix fan a-holes who attack people for posting this evidence and ban them? Again, only the most observant realize Jeffery was most likely murdered for his role and the convenience his death would have for those who really murdered Jimi…If you think of the way Jeffery died then you are at the right place for who really did it and why…

  76. Good read, and good points On things I never even knew about. I don’t even know how I got here, when I should be mowing and raking the yard. This was better time spent.

  77. What I do not understand is how someone like Monika could write an entire book on Jimi and his spiritual beliefs after spending only a few days with him. I think she tried to exaggerate her importance to Jimi as his soulmate. Monika was about promoting herself and her importance to Jimi. When Kathy dispelled this myth it all got a bit too much for Monika and I think that is why she committed suicide.

    • One reply about every 3 years is the pathetic response rate for this epic subject…Ivana – the reason Monika knew so much about Jimi is because she was a CIA operative who studied her target in order to get Jimi to warm up to her as part of her infiltration…I think there are signs that Intelligence mind control hypnosis may also have been employed in this process…It took me years to figure out the meaning of the frustration you are experiencing…I also had the same puzzlement until I deciphered it and figured out its true interpretation…Monika is a complex person and she was an Intel infiltrator who ended up getting impressed and mesmerized by the mystical figure Jimi Hendrix because of her proximity to him…What happened was Monika realized the stuff she studied about Jimi was real once she experienced it in person and she basically became a follower of the person she was spooking…All this is over Kathy’s head…She is a person who is blind to these subtleties and sees everything in a left brain sense…Monika had heavy right brain intuition like Jimi and that is why she was so good at describing it…Which in turn attracted Jimi and was then used to further infiltrate him…The bottom line is just because you’re a spook infiltrating Jimi doesn’t mean you can’t be a follower of the target’s deepest inner world…Monika was consumed and tortured by this for the rest of her life before she was also assassinated by Intel…Monika did not commit suicide…She was “suicided” by the best abilities of the dark forces that killed Jimi…I’m angry at Kathy because she refuses to see the obvious bigger picture here (or at least talk about it in public)…

  78. Thanks for your comments. I think Kathy had the practicality of mind to bring about the re-investigation into the death of Jimi. The court case between Kathy and Monika was brought about because Monika called Kathy an inveterate liar in regards to her relationship with Jimi when it was Monika who had the fictional relationship to Jimi. I am sorry Jimi went back to the Samarkand with Monika and I am equally as sorry that Monika ended up the way she did. As l see it the only winner in this saga is Kathy. I think she has done more than anyone to keep Jimi’s memory alive.

    • Of course I totally agree and remain dedicated to and appreciative of the Joan Of Ark effort Kathy made…We owe an unpayable debt to Kathy because she was the only friend of Jimi’s who did what needed to be done and it was because of her good practical sense and forthrightness…Hear hear…However, that said, there is a second necessary follow-through anyone who truly stands up for Jimi as Kathy claims needs to do…What Kathy did was the first part…Now the second part needs to be done as a follow-through because the complete job wasn’t done…I don’t mean to be critical of Kathy but she might not have been the best person to front the effort because she failed to execute on a legal basis and seemed to be mostly interested in getting Monika rather than pursuing the full evidence in the case…By failing to assert a sound legal attack against the serious opening the British Government left her she allowed them to fail to account for some pretty wide open evidence that would have led to the full legal outcome the evidence demanded…As much as we owe Kathy she only did half a job and is not helping those who are trying to carry this forward and do what her effort made possible…For God’s sake Kathy scoffs at the suggestion Jeffery killed Jimi on the Montalvo show and indirectly defends him saying, “If they had evidence why didn’t they bring it forward then?”…Anyone with common sense would know there are many reasons why people don’t come forward and, as much as I hate to say, Kathy is one of those persons…She knows a lot more than she’s telling and her telling Montalvo that she has more to say in a future book isn’t really a “practical” approach to getting justice when it counts is it? Sorry Kathy but this is an open playing field under God’s sunlight…If you are holding back then you are working directly against Jimi and his interests…Jimi waits for you to do the right thing for him sooner rather than later…If I was on Kathy’s team there would have been a different outcome and the British Government would not have gotten away with the legal murder they did…

  79. I wonder if Eric Burdon, Gerry Stickells and/or Eric Barrett are planning on speaking from the grave. Have some avenue to release info post mordem ?

    • Jimi is rock’s skeleton in the closet…No one is going to own up to holding back on him and being in cowardly complicity…The whole power order of the world is based on not owning up to this dastardly crucifixion…It is both an honor to Jimi and what he was and defining unspoken mark of shame to those who betrayed him – which was just about everybody…

  80. This of course is all hear say evidence and would never hold up in any court, some of you swear that the CIA or MJ was responsible for Murder, that’s a brave talk from people who go buy books that could very well be untrue, none of those people pushed for a trial, only just to make money. What if M.D’s accounts were true if the CIA was involved like some of you swear by, they would have the whole thing covered up from the ambulance drivers and Doctors testimony. M.D was proven a liar…not so sure she was, he could of been alive when they arrived, Who knows? Hendrix was worth more alive by todays standards, always had been…any idiot would know that…but what was done with his guitars, I know only a few have been recovered. Its a money game anymore…Dweezil has one his family probably a few, tappy;s went back to the Hendrix family…, the mojo about those axes are mesmerizing, a lot of people think he was a black guitarist, untrue he was half Cherokee Indian, which I believe his spiritualness in his music comes from that mix. I first heard about Jimi when I heard Purple Haze at my friends house, we agreed he was gay, lol…we thought he said xcuse me while I kiss this guy…lol…my first album was the B.O.G I love them changes Buddy was great on that track. I have all of them now, but the BOG had its own kind of mojo for sure…Machine Gun is why is and will be the G.O.A.T. in any event there’s not one person today that can confirm or deny he was offed…so what is the point, unless they dig up his body for DNA samples…no one can really say what happened for sure. its like a normal police scene when they bust druggies, they have to wade thru 99% lies and probably never get to the truth….RIP J.H family fans and friends. Just my 2 cents

    • For 10 years I’ve been dealing with internet experts like yourself who think your internet-gotten opinion is just as good as persons who have deeply researched the subject and gotten close to some of the people involved…Internet experts follow the psychological pattern of getting defensive and then seeking the denials that back their ignorant opinion…What you write is dead wrong and Kathy Etchingham did push for a new investigation…The British government lied and shut it down with a false statement by the British Attorney General saying there was no new evidence when in fact there was highly important new evidence Kathy had discovered…If you bothered to study the evidence Kathy got hold of Britain’s best forensic pathologist Dr Rufus Crompton and he said Jimi died no later than 5:30am due to the undigested rice in his stomach at autopsy…You say maybe Monika was telling the truth but it is well-known that she lied about the time of death by about as much as 6 hours and the ambulance attendant confirmed this by saying the vomit was too dry and hard for the ventilation equipment to penetrate…Mitch Mitchell also indirectly confirmed this in his book when he said he got a call around 7am where he was told Jimi was dead…

      As far as I know Steve Roby looked in to Jimi’s genealogy and he had no Cherokee blood…People who had white blood mixed in to their African blood were sometimes said to have Cherokee blood back then so the white background could not be admitted…Africans mixed in with Indians due to racism and then started to claim Indian blood when they actually didn’t have any…

      You obviously have no idea what you are talking about so we can chalk your entry up to another worthless opinion that works directly against Jimi and his interests….I myself have researched this for 10 years and argued it on the internet…There is no doubt Jimi was murdered and people seeking shallow excuses instead of intelligently addressing the facts don’t help…I have proven Jimi was murdered in the forensics…You can’t have 5 bottles of wine witnessed in your body by a medical doctor and only have the 5mg blood alcohol content Jimi registered at his autopsy…It is proof of murder and you won’t find any other innocent drug/alcohol choking on vomit death with those forensic particulars…

  81. My personal opinion is his death was accidental…with all the events changing from time to time promotes books to be sold. I don’t believe his management had anything to do with what happened, quite the contrary I think they afforded JIMI every luxury until the money dried up, that last gig when the money boxes where stolen was probably by some debtors. Warner had the rights to his master tapes, JIMI was a perfectionist. its common stance when the money dries up who can maintain that lifestyle, Brian Jones went through that, The Beatles, (because John wouldn’t sign off) The Stones getting ripped from A.K and gag orders in place. In the end everyone just grabbed what they could steal…if you can picture a vulture scene here. that’s more than likely the way it was. M.J had big bills to pay the offshore account was for tax evasion., running the JHEx would cost a lot, the gear, the transpo, the studio, he was about the only real big live gig going at the time, The Stones where just getting started again, Black Sabbath, and Deep Purple, The Who, etc there weren’t many super acts back then didn’t Hendrix jam with Dave Mason? and there were a lot of tapes with other musicians as well, Maybe JH got tired burned out and just wanted a break, but the massive bills he couldn’t stop. I really don’t think there was foul play, everyone pretty much loved JH…R.I.P

    • You obviously have no idea what you are talking about…You are actually saying in public that the money dried up when you are referring to rock’s most famous superstar at the time who could simply schedule a show and get $100,000 for it in a finger snap…The money that was stolen at Fehmarn was stolen by violent biker gangs that may have been influenced by Intelligence as part of a program to shut down the 60’s…The money never dried up since Jeffery had stolen up to 5 million…Rumors like the money drying up or Jimi burning out up were perpetuated by those who covered-up Jimi’s murder in order to make it look like he withered away to a miserable end…But if you pay attention to what people close to Jimi were saying they said that was rubbish and Jimi was planning a big future without Jeffery…

      If you think the evidence that was shown by Tony Brown and Kathy Etchingham in their books was simply a crass ploy to make money then you are ignorant of those persons and their motives…Kathy described in her book that the only reason she got in to it was to help her friend Noel Redding whom Monika sent lawyers after because Noel wrote in his book that Monika’s failure to call the ambulance aided in Jimi’s death…Monika was of course correct…Her failure to call the ambulance had nothing to do with Jimi’s death since he was murdered and calling an ambulance would have done no good…You slander good people and good motives since those books made little money…

      Whoever you are you’re a fool who foolishly doesn’t realize how much evidence there is out there…Your entries are mostly shallow, vaporous, falsely-based speculation that miss most of the main evidence…You seem naively unaware that there are persons who interviewed those closest to the evidence and that there is serious evidence of Michael Jeffery being fired by Jimi 12 hours before Jimi’s mysterious death with everyone involved lying…The covert murder method of being deliberately incapacitated with pills and drowned in wine to make it appear as a reckless drug and alcohol death is right out of Jeffery’s Military Intelligence training and only a fool would ignore it or dismiss it in such a shallowly cavalier manner as you do…

      Jeffery was never made to pay those off-shore tax bills after Jimi died nor were the true circumstances of Jimi’s death ever investigated while MI-6 Jeffery was alive…

      No, if you bothered to study the real facts, Jimi finally made the move to fire Jeffery after realizing he was not working in his interests and was no good…You are just another idiot who seeks to blame the victim instead of honestly seeking the real cause that is quite easy to find with very little effort…Jimi fired Jeffery at 5pm on the 17th and 12 hours later he was dead…The two were not unrelated and anyone who doesn’t seek the facts in that direction is wildly derelict in their reasoning and obviously only seeking to prove their own denial…

      • More bogus lies coming from Buster. Jimi never fired Jeffery on September the 17th cuz he wasn’t able to due to the way Jeffery structured the contract. Jimi was trying to find a way out of the contract. He couldn’t fire Jeffery. So, there goes your phony murder motive.

  82. its just my opinion m8, it sounds like you were at the scene when all this went down. maybe you were there when Barrabas was set free by the people instead of Jesus….lol…Whatever…its not hard to fathom J.H was an easy mark for outsiders to ride on his tails, even Clapton said something to that effect, he was not very careful who he hung out with. what would noel redding have to do with any of this?, Hendrix didn’t even like him, he had been fired in Denver….whatever I think he was just depressed and did not want to go on anymore. maybe your trying to sell a new movie, I don’t know but your facts seem hearsay to me and totally after the fact…by the with trolling people out is totally uncool, I don’t troll you because your op is diff I just don’t buy into the FBI;s war on rock and roll. The Who are still around right, and so are the Stones, Mac EC and others too…so…….Cheers JH RIP

    • You’re obviously ignorant…Noel was tightly involved with those in the know who trusted him because he was a band insider…Like I already said, if you bothered to educate yourself on the subject you would find that Noel wrote in his book that Monika contributed to Jimi’s death by failing to call the ambulance…Monika sent lawyers after Noel and threatened to take his house so Noel called Kathy Etchingham and she was the first person to talk to the police and ambulance attendants from that morning and found out Monika was lying about what happened and was covering-up a 5 hour clean up of the flat before calling the ambulance…It is in Kathy’s book ‘Through Gypsy Eyes’ and Tony Brown’s book ‘Hendrix The Final Days’…No, I wasn’t there but a lot of other people who Monika failed to mention were and you might find their accounts interesting if you ever bother to credibly look in to this…So far you haven’t…Plus the forensics we “there” so to speak and don’t change…

      Since you obviously haven’t studied this at all and obviously don’t know anything about it I’m not sure why you think people would be interested in your un-informed opinion?…It is obvious to me that you are trying to hide behind calling all the evidence hearsay and think that is adequate to cover-up the pure evidence of murder that your posts haven’t managed to address…For instance you ignored my citation of Dr Crompton’s estimation of a 5:30am time of death based on the undigested rice in Jimi’s stomach…That’s just the opposite of hearsay and once inputted in to the real forensics from that morning that the British government never considered it proves homicide on a medical basis…It shows Jimi had the pills in him for no more than 2 hours and maybe as little as one hour…So there wasn’t either enough time or barbiturate to overdose, especially with Jimi who had a notorious tolerance for drugs…You didn’t answer the point…You can’t have 5 bottles of wine inside you with only a trace blood alcohol content, like Jimi had, innocently…You won’t be able to find any other case with those forensic particulars…It’s proof of murder…Jimi was physically drowned with wine…He did not die from the pills…

      I don’t know what you mean by trolling…I post straight and serious and can back up what I write…

      The bottom line is any accidental death scenario you post I can disprove with the real forensics…The British government never did this because they bought Monika’s lies and miscalculated the time of death by over 5 hours, which is a life time in forensics and invalidates the original cause of death finding at the Inquest…The British government is in contempt of its own law that forces a re-opening of the case when the original finding has been disproven…

  83. Whatever, I mean lots of people were interviewed and all agree JIMI was not well, I guess ater 64 gigs in 65 days I don’t know how he did it. a lot o famous people testified he was worn out and tired of it all. besides that B.O.G was produced by AD at the record plant after Woodstock. So it wasn’t the JHEx alter Denver. A lot o peeps wanted to get together with JIMI then Ginger B.. However there’s something Eric B. said that bothers me, when he said Jimi was thrown around like a basketball….Hmmmm…
    I mean its possible, but as a musician myself people get burntout.Whatever went on that sad morning im not sure if it can be legally dealt with Maybe one day …Anythings possible…Cheers

    • Thanks for your useless rumination that shows depraved indifference towards Jimi’s fate…You are probably British where it is a national policy to deny Jimi’s murder…Yes Jimi was burnt out…But only because he had been stressed to his limits by trying to battle with Jeffery in a secret cold war that was ongoing and explained both their actions during that time…If you want to quote Eric show the quote where he said “All I can say is the business killed Jimi”…Jeffery was the business…It isn’t hard to figure out…The reason there has been so much resistance to solving it is because the British government helped cover it up and they don’t want to admit it…Figure it out man…Monika said Jimi wore a crucifix to bed that night…And if you read the final ‘Story Of Life’ poem it is highly fatalistic and references Christ and his fate…

  84. Jm’s Album Devotion was released in September 1970 im guessing the mixdown was a month or two beforehand. Brian Auger: In 1970, I was in New York and I got a call from John McLaughlin and he said, “You should come down and listen to the mix of my album, I know you’re going to really dig it”. So I went along. Then the door opens and who should come in but Jimi and his girlfriend. We hadn’t seen each other for a long time.
    But the thing that bothered me was that his skin tone, and that of his girlfriend, it was kind of a pallid grey colour. And I thought, “Whoa, he doesn’t look too good here”. We were talking and he asked me, “Listen, Bri, can you stay and make an album with me?”. And I said, “I’d love to, man, but I have all these contracts that I have to fulfil, I just can’t do it”.
    And then Jimi pulls out of his pocket this silver paper, opens it up, and there’s this brown heroin in there, and he takes a snort of that, gives it to his girlfriend, and then says, “Oh, sorry, Bri”, and tries to hand it to me. This is one of those moments I’ll never forget. I said to Jimi, “Hey Jim, I’m telling you, man, you’d better quit doing that stuff, as soon as you can, because it’s gonna kill you”. And he said this to me – I’ll never forget it – he said, “You know what, Bri, I need a lot more people around me like you”. That really touched me.

    • Some people insist on protecting Jimi’s reputation by denying he ever did heroin…As this story makes clear he did it recreationally because he had a lot of people pushing it around him including Devon and AD…I found a witness whose bass player walked by the dressing room and saw Jimi nodded with a needle still in his arm…That bass player woke Jimi up and fixed the situation and then lectured him on not doing heroin…Yeah, like many people in the 60’s Jimi flirted with it…However by the time of his death he kicked it and was probably witnessed withdrawing from it cold turkey by Kathy Etchingham at the Londonderry Hotel in London in late August 1970…In any case his autopsy made a special notation saying there was zero trace of heroin in the body and no sign of heroin use (needle tracks)…

  85. the headlines stated Eric B was at the hospital when JH died…so did M.D…and BTW im not British. try reading the Original Headlines for once. “He was tossed around like a football’ was a direct quote from Eric B.

  86. what people fail to realize that J.H is was and always be the G.O.A.T he set the trends and played like was a real electric church music, he was far beyond the blues. where he went is probably a better place, like he said, They don’t know, what i know, do you know? I dont know! and then laughs Timeless. many songs about him directly/ indirectly. even his songs tell a story about his life. every one that died that way all cry murder. I mean you can collect jars of earth where he stood or get a splinter of his guitar if it helps you to understand what he wanted people to know. all the books and movies are cool but to me never quite reach the mark as he could. people are gifted enough to play like him are the same as the aforementioned. everyone chases a legend. but he can never be caught. RIP JH

    • I don’t know what your agenda is but if you say Jimi went to a better place in front of the fact the world’s most magical guitarist had the rest of his life and career cut off by some of the worst concentrated evil forces all coming against him and what he stood for, there’s something seriously wrong with you…I don’t need to be told to read the headlines, I’ve already read them…I’m not the one who just a few posts ago was saying Monika might have been telling the truth when she said Jimi was still alive…Monika was lying in order to cover-up the fact Jimi died before she even called Burdon and they all knew it…What Monika was doing was covering-up the fact all the Hendrix office personnel who were there that morning knew Jimi was murdered and were covering up evidence in order to allow their lethally dangerous mob-connected, MI-6 boss, who now served as threat to them, time to get away and therefore be less of a threat to themselves…How quickly those mf-er’s turned on Jimi when it came to saving their own cowardly lilly-white English skin…I don’t know what point you think you are making and I personally find it sickening that some feckless Hendrix fans try to use Jimi’s magic to get around the Tough Reality of his murder…What those fools fail to realize is us who do justice for Jimi by getting the truth out about his fate are the ones who serve that magic the best and do righteous by it and how getting the record straight on his murder is in fact putting the final correct interpretation to that magic by allowing its final context…There’s too many fools out there trying to ride on Jimi’s magic in order to use Jimi to slide by with some personal agenda…I think those who truly understand Jimi and what he was will see how the action of this justice sets all that right…And how it was in tune to what Jimi was and what he magically hinted at was his predetermined fate…You can’t kill Jimi and what he stood for with murder…And you can’t deny it with foolishness…I think we’ve proven that by what we are doing if you really have ears for Jimi Hendrix…

      • “However by the time of his death he kicked it and was probably witnessed withdrawing from it cold turkey by Kathy Etchingham at the Londonderry Hotel in London in late August 1970″…you said this? anyone to cobberate this? i say this because some of the footage of JH didn’t strike me that way towards those time periods, like i have experienced that myself its easy to see. and secondly heroin in those days and his circle of friends would have been a near impossibility to kick, these days they have methadone to get you off. and it takes a while to get clean go ask any medical professional about it. as a month or 2 before in NYC you know what he was doing. its well documented. Also the newspaper said JH was talking with that Sarah Lawrence. “Im done in” September 5th 1970. and that’s what the papers reported it was heroin, then it was sleeping tablets, a restaurant bar still has that on the wall. But to me that’s what made him the greatest the ability to perform as a near perfectionist. im not condoning it by any means, American Indians use this manner to connect to the spirit world, have been for centuries… Peace

  87. Iin the slight chance you are r, heard from the fam what your doing, i must say bro very very cool…dont get this, but..we go back a long way, and dont fault a bro who believes what he reads, lol…peace

    • Jimi had an almost supernatural power within him that explained his tolerance to drugs etc…If he snorted heroin recreationally he was probably titrating it or “chipping”…This would be easier to kick…Alan Douglas and Devon were over there so Jimi was probably dragged in to participating a few times…But the bottom line is Jimi’s autopsy made a special notation saying there was no heroin or signs of heroin use on the body…Heroin had nothing to do with Jimi’s death…

      Jimi’s meeting with Sharon Lawrence was on the 16th…It might have been heroin that he was obviously high on…But it makes no difference because all that counts is the forensic period of the last 12 hours and his doings…

      Please stop posting that Jimi died by accident…He was obviously murdered and you’re not helping Jimi by posting the false information his murderers got away with for decades…

      No, I’m not RH…

  88. I guess I’ve had a big disconnect regarding Jimi’s heroin use and I have naively dismissed it regardless of the fact that I have read accounts by people with first hand knowledge of his smack usage , i.e., Buddy Miles, Noel, Alan Douglas… heck two night’s before his death, Eric Burden and War refused to let him sit in because he appeard “smacked out”.

    That being said, it brings a different light to the infamous Toronto bust and Jimi’s proclaimed innocence of posessing the H.

    Do you guys believe that Jefferies did indeed set Jimi up for the Toronto bust by planting heroin in his flight bag or was it just another example of Jimi’s legendary absentmindedness ? ( remember how Jimi left the tape reels of the final mixes Axis in a taxi ?)

    • Don’t swing the pendulum too far in the other direction…Jimi was far too productive to be any heroin junkie…No way, no how…Jimi was literally the most productive 60’s rock figure who in 4 short years made enough music to fill a lifetime for other musicians…Look at the videos of him at the time…In no way was he strung-out or addicted and in no way does his recreational use change anything about him or the things that happened to him…

      If you look at the Toronto bust the little pill bottle of heroin was sitting right on top of Jimi’s clothes when Canadian customs opened the suitcase…In other words it was planted there on purpose in order to be found…If you read the books Jimi said the word was out on the airplane prior to landing to check themselves for drugs and make sure they didn’t forget anything because a tip-off came in that they were going to be searched at customs…Afterwards Jimi said he thought Michael had something to do with it…Michael had a habit of not being around when he did something dirty and Jimi said Michael was no where to be found and was in Hawaii when he was busted…

      The most probable explanation for Jimi’s heroin bust was Jimi was in the midst of trying to fire Jeffery and was making moves even back in May 1969…Bob Levine said “Jeffery handled Jimi like a CIA operation”…For some reason forcing Jimi in to total obligation to Jeffery to get him out of a possible 7 year jail sentence was in Jeffery’s interest and was in line with other such messages Jeffery sent to Jimi…Plus Jeffery’s control of Jimi that way was also in the interest of US Intel that would be quite happy seeing Jimi tainted with a heroin bust…Jimi broke up the Experience the following month in June…Figure out why people and don’t be thick…

    • There are a lot of conspiracy kooks who make up and believe any nonsense regarding Jefferies from planting drugs on Hendrix, from him being some super “secret agent”, to him murdering Hendrix. There is no real evidence to corroborate any of this, yet people still continue to spout bogus nonsense to make themselves sound credible or refusing to admit Hendrix died the way he did.

      Jefferies would never “set up Hendrix” by planting drugs on him because he could have had a long prison sentence if he was convicted of possession of heroin. There as no guarantee that Hendrix would have beaten drug charges and Jefferies wouldn’t have risked losing his cash cow on some ridiculous stunt. No manager would ever consider dong anything of the sort yet conspiracy theorists run wild with the claim that Jefferies planted drugs on Hendrix in Toronto.

      Hendrix was a heroin user, so it could have been his own he was trying to hide or a fan put it in his bag like he testified to.

      This puts to bed another wacky conspiracy theory that holds no weight as conspiracy theorists use it as one of their ridiculous claims.

      • According to Trixie Sullivan, Jefferies wasn’t even in London at the time of Jimi’s death. Kathy Etchingham said in a radio interview that she never believed that Jefferies was implicated in Jimi’s death whatsoever. The mistake Jimi made was going back to the Samarkand with Monika and accepting those sleeping tablets he knew nothing about from, in reality, someone he did not know very well.

      • Jason is typical of the outdated deniers of 10 years ago…I call him an “internet expert”…You can tell from a person’s wording that they have no clue about the evidence and are just referring to their own overly-general denial rhetoric in their head…

        Because Jason deals from the perspective of shallow knowledge and overly-general assumption he skips all the known history on this that was recorded in books and quotes from the persons involved and goes right to his own preconceived logic…Meanwhile more studied experts on the subject know that Jimi himself was quoted as thinking Michael had something to do with the heroin bust in Toronto…The small pill bottle of heroin was found by Canadian Customs sitting right on top of Jimi’s clothes when they opened the suitcase…Jimi said word was spread in the airplane before landing in Toronto that a bust was expected so make sure they had no drugs on them or in their bags…

        What Jason ignores is the fact Jimi started his serious efforts to remove Jeffery from being manager in January 1969…The May 1969 bust was right in synch with Jeffery making a serious move on Jimi to make sure he was dependent on him…Jason is ignorant of Michael Jeffery’s MI-6 status and even mocks it while ignoring all the evidence for it…I’ve personally spoken to people who knew Jeffery and witnessed his Military Intelligence status directly…Jason should have spoken to Tappy Wright about it…Tappy told me things that left no doubt…Bob Levine was on record as saying “Michael ran Jimi like a CIA operation”…The best proof of Jeffery’s Military Intelligence status is the fact the British government withholds their National Service records for Jeffery and his documented Military Intelligence status…No one could bomb the harbor where the 6th Fleet was anchored and get away with it unless he was a high-ranking spook…Michael’s father even described the evidence for his son being a spook…He said Michael came home in civilian clothes on his furloughs when other boys who went in to the service with him came home in their uniforms…No serious Hendrix source denies Jeffery’s MI-6 membership – but more importantly methods…So Jason is ignorant of the 1960’s and Intel’s methods and influences to not realize the heroin bust was controllable at Jeffery’s spook level and wasn’t the risk he portrays…Jeffery’s Intel status was also confirmed in the way he himself died…To ignore it is to insult our intelligence…

        It takes real nerve to enter dumb-down level denial on a website that contains some of the best proof for Jimi’s murder…I have proven Jimi was murdered in the forensic evidence…You cannot have 5 bottles of wine flooding your lungs and stomach and only have a 5mg blood alcohol content like Jimi did…The only way you can possess those forensic particulars is by homicide where the victim was physically drowned in wine…Despite the lowbrow grade analysis by Caesar Glebbeek, Jimi also did not have enough barbiturate in him to kill him – nor did he have the pills inside him long enough for the claimed cause of death…

        If Jason dared try to describe how Jim died on a technical basis where he had to back it up with a detailed description and forensics I could disprove it using the real evidence the British government ignored…

      • Buster is the typical tin foil hatter conspiracy theorist. Buster reads tabloid journalism believing it as facts but has no actual proof. All these incredible claims made by only one source with no proof or evidence to prove it’s true. They string together this junk from unreliable sources one quote at a time until they develop a ridiculous conspiracy theory.

        Buster is guilty of recreating his own fallacies instead of stating the actual facts. Jimi only felt Jeffery planted heroin cuz some people in his inner circle suspected he did. No proof and only an assumption. Jeffery wouldn’t risk sending Hendrix to prison for a decade on a fake drug bust. Makes no sense at all. Hendrix’s career would have been done and Jeffery would be out money. Another phony innuendo tin foil hatters use.

        It was Chas Chandler who was talking to Jimi about being his manager in 1969. Jimi liked the idea of that but Jimi wasn’t searching for a new manager himself. Buster does not know the facts making up a conspiracy innuendos.

        You spoke with Tappy Wright? This all makes sense now. Tappy Wright was a lying fraud who lied about Jeffery murdering Hendrix to sell his book. Wright has no credibility and you take him seriously. A total joke..

        There is no evidence of Jeffery being in British Military Intelligence. This is another b.s. claim tin foil hatters use. Jeffery never advanced above the rank of private during his service.

        Now we get the imaginary bottles of wine told by Bannister. Bannister was convicted for fraud as a doctor and lost his medical license. Same guy who read Electric Gypsy getting the wine idea from the book. He was facing a malpractice suit and needed a cover story. Banister also changed his wine accounts over the years. Another fraud you take seriously. Serious researchers don’t take lying frauds as their main sources when they have no evidence.

        Buster’s 2 main sources of his murder conspiracy

        Tappy Wright – admitted to lying about Jeffery murdering Hendrix to sell a book. No proof of it and only a false claim from Wright that happened before Jeffery’s death. No court would accept this as evidence.

        Doctor Bannister- Fraud doctor who lost his medical license. No proof of any wine flooding Hendrix’s lungs and only his claim he saw it. No other doctor has seen flooding lungs. No report was ever filed about flooding lungs. No police were called about flooding lungs. No bottles wine ever existed.

        2 fraud sources Buster uses for his fake conspiracy theory. Does anybody with an ounce of common sense believe this crap?

  89. The jury acquitted Jimi so I am inclined to believe Jimi’s version of events where he said someone has thrown the drug into his bag. If I remember correctly from my reading I think Jimi said it was a woman.

  90. Although he does not completely dismiss the “Jeffrey Motive” , Michael Fairchild seems to lean towards Hendrix’ roadies, Stickells and Barrett as being the most actively involved players at Monica’s flat. Fairchild also mentions the possibilty of the spouse of one of Jimi’s bedmates being a prime suspect. This caught my attention as author, David Henderson, also mentioned this scenario as a possible motive.

    I am not too familiar with Fairchild and I am wondering about his credibility. Any thoughts regaridng him ?

    https://www.rockprophecy.com/hendrix_death.html

    • I think Fairchild did dismiss any possibility Jeffery murdered Jimi…You have to be careful when saying things like “most actively involved players at Jimi’s flat”…The detail in that is important and necessitates answering exactly when were they active? …I’m not sure how much credible evidence Fairchild has behind either accusation outside the very inventive speculation he tends towards on his website…Let’s not forget Michael was fired 12 hours before Jimi’s death and had much more motive than anybody…And let’s not completely dismiss Tappy either…Michael also had a psychological profile of burning business interests that were failing…The most incriminating evidence all points to Jeffery and I think it’s a safe bet…Fairchild is probably the victim of his own biases…

  91. Tappy admitted in an interview he made the whole thing up implicating Jeffrey in Jimi’s death in order to sell more books.

    • Not exactly…I was friends with Tappy for the last 5 years of his life…Apparently he told Bob Levine that he made the story up to sell his book…Sounds pretty damning except the evidence that Jimi was murdered doesn’t rely on Tappy…It exists outside of Tappy on its own and proves Jimi was murdered without Tappy…Plus there’s a lot more to Tappy than people realize and he might have heard about Jimi being murdered from other people than Jeffery but couldn’t say…I confronted Tappy on that once and he said nobody has ever said that to my face and if they did I would sue them…

  92. Offhand remarks like this latest comment by Ivana Selvatino are especially irritating when they offer no substantiation. So Tappy, you say, made it up. You say he admitted doing so in an interview. Which interview was that, Madam? I want a day, a time, a place, an interviewer. Or else you are talking through your anal sphincter. Admittedly, Tappy did insert his claim at the end of a book totally peppered and spiced from beginning to end with jokey anecdotes, so it would be easy for someone to assume that this claim about Jeffrey was just another joke, but I have heard interviews with Tappy, and he claimed precisely the opposite.

    It is entirely annoying to anyone who has read the literature on Jimi Hendrix to hear so many people chiming in with their heads totally up their asses, completely oblivious to what has been written about this for decades.

    Page 165 of Monika Dannemann’s INNER WORLD OF JIMI HENDRIX:
    “Jimi picked up the telephone and asked me to listen carefully to what he had to say to his lawyer, Henry Steingarten. He came straight to the point, telling his lawyer that he wanted to leave Jeffrey for good, no matter what the cost might be. Steingarten, who was in partnership with Jeffrey’s lawyer, asked Jimi if he had thought about the consequences, without making clear exactly what he meant by this. Jimi answered firmly that he had, and told his lawyer to proceed with his instructions.”

    “I believe the circumstances surrounding his death are suspicious and I think he was murdered.”—Ed Chalpin, Proprietor of Studio 76

    “I feel he was murdered, frankly. Somebody have him something. Somebody gave him something they shouldn’t have.”—John McLaughlin, Guitarist

    David Henderson’s biography of Jimi Hendrix, ‘Scuse Me While I Kiss the Sky, which has been continually updated since it was first written decades ago, begins with suspicions regarding Jimi’s death, implying murder from page one to the end.

    Of all the people commenting on this website, BUSTER is the ONLY ONE doing any credible investigation of the sources and the evidence, and he has actively and relentlessly interviewed the people still living who were then in a position to see what was happening.

    Kathy Etchingham’s book THROUGH GYPSY EYES (a little paperback of which is today on Amazon for $148.99!) includes interviews with the two ambulence drivers who transported Jimi to the hospital. Neither had before or after that day ever worked together. They were interviewed separately, both said that nobody was in the apartment when they were there. Only the corpse of Jimi Hendrix, and neither of them had any idea who Jimi Hendrix was. There was no Eric Burdon, despite his own claims (and Burdon contradicts his account in his second autobiography DON’T LET ME BE MISUNDERSTOOD). There was no Monika Dannemann. Therefore, both Burdon and Dannemann have been less than forthright, to say the least.

    John McDermott’s book on Jimi, SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT, also quotes a guest at a Track Records party the night of Sept. 16. Someone saw Mike Jeffrey there. Whether that’s true, I have no idea.

    Bob Levine said Jeffrey’s ‘surprise’ that Jimi was dead did not at all seem genuine; rather, he felt it was highly suspicious.

    The evidence, both factual and circumstantial, goes on and on, and BUSTER has done an excellent job in gathering and presenting it to those with the wherewithal, i.e. intelligence and open minds, to listen to it.

    Fortunately, BUSTER’s views are getting out there, and it has been good to hear him articulate the evidence on radio stations from coast to coast.

    Cheers,
    Scott J. Thompson

  93. Thank you for replying so quickly. I just want to say that I have been a fan of Jimi for a number of years. I have no personal connection with any Hendrix personnel and I mainly get my information from books. I found that some accounts seem more plausible than others. As I understand it Michael and Kathy got together to discuss the events of the morning Jimi died and found some incriminating evidence. I also do not find anything unusual in Barrett and Stickells collecting Jimi’s belongings as this would have been their duty. Monika panicked that morning and instead of calling for the ambulance called others first for help. This delay may have caused Jimi’s death or either he had been dead for a while. According to Monika the Samarkand hotel was meant to have been a refuge for Jimi but it seems that a number of people knew about it. I recall Slater saying that there was no food in the flat meaning that Jimi was not living there and Jimi had few belongings there; they were at the Cumberland hotel. I like to believe that Jimi returned to the Samarkand with Monika only in order to retrieve his guitar. It was not the cosy love nest Monika had us believe. As Mitch Mitchell stated Monika was not the great love of Jimi’s life and I remember Stickells mentioning that Monika exaggerated her affair with Jimi.

    • Michael Fairchild did a lot to put in to articulate writing the conflicts that emphasized the serious problems with the accounts of how Jimi died…He got together with Kathy Etchingham and was the first person to give form to the scary reality that was coming together from Kathy’s findings…This was an offshoot of Kathy backing Monika off her legal attack on Noel Redding for saying Monika delayed calling the ambulance…The reason Monika mentioned Barrett and Stickells only being interested in collecting notes and phone messages from the office is because Monika knew Barrett and Stickells were removing any possible evidence that connected Jeffery to the scene…They were working for Jeffery at that point and their sole duty was to remove any evidence that would connect Jeffery to the scene because they knew exactly what happened…Monika told them…Monika did not panic at all that morning…She’s one of the coolest customers I’ve ever seen under pressure…She was a good German spook and skilled at her craft…She tried to call Alvenia, not Burdon…She was going to try to deal with it with only Alvenia but was forced to deal with Burdon because Alvenia was sleeping over at his hotel…The reason Monika did not call for an ambulance is because she did not want to get trapped alone dealing with the authorities…She wanted to figure out how to get out of that situation which is why she involved others…It is important to realize this was calculated and not the result of any confusion or panic…She knew exactly what she was doing…Ivana – It is very important you clear the stories you are using to determine the facts from your mind…Those stories are all contrived lies…It took me many years to finally realize that and stop trying to figure things out by means of their lies…When Monika called Burdon she told him Jimi was dead…And I’m pretty sure she told him by whom…You need to read more on this than you evidently have because Kathy Etchingham consulted with the famous pathologist Dr Rufus Crompton who told her the undigested rice in Jimi’s stomach precluded any time of death later than 5:30am…That forensic determination was very accurate and proved that Monika called out not because Jimi was in trouble but because he was dead…If you then run the scenarios you know about through your mind with the understanding Jimi was dead when Monika called their behaviors make sense in that light and the rest is academic…I assure you the Samarkand Hotel was a death trap Jimi failed to detect and there is good reason to believe Monika was working with Jeffery at minimum and was possibly an agent (or pawn) of the Central Intelligence Agency…

  94. Jimi was most likely the victim/participant in MK-Ultra mind control tactics while he was stationed in Kentucky. Michael Jeffery was clearly an intelligence operative, or at least someone who’d answer to those in those communities. He was more like a “handler” than a true manager to Jimi. He wanted to possess him and keep him “in line” with what the US/UK powers that be would desire. Supporting the Panthers, forming an all black group and then playing a prominent anti-Vietnam War concert with that group, was not exactly what Jeffery had in mind. No wonder Jimi was nefariously dosed with strong acid (or whatever it was) just before that show, effectively disbanding the Band of Gypsys. Jimi seemed to fire Jeffery the day before he died. Put the pieces together, people. And if you think the US/UK government and intelligence communities would have little interest in a “harmless” rock star like Jimi, read up on their interest in John Lennon, among many others. The truth is sadly obvious in this case, no way did Jimi accidentally OD and choke to death. Red wine was literally Everywhere on, in, and around him. The official story doesn’t add up.

  95. Dear Scott. You are obviously very passionate about this subject. In no way did I mean to discredit Buster’s opinions. This website is meant to be a forum for people to give their interpretations. Accounts of Jimi’s death have changed and evolved over time mainly due to the work of Kathy Etchingham, and others. Please do not use vulgar language.

    • I did not use vulgar language. The words I used are used by doctors. My comment wasn’t published anyway. Moreover, I have many comments already on this site, and I have posted things on it for almost 10 years. I am fully aware of every single comment on it, and most of them are imbecilic. I hosted a radio program with Buster here in San Francisco.

      On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:25 PM The Velvet Rocket wrote:

      > Ivana Selvatino commented: “Dear Scott. You are obviously very passionate > about this subject. In no way did I mean to discredit Buster’s opinions. > This website is meant to be a forum for people to give their > interpretations. Accounts of Jimi’s death have changed and evolved over tim” >

      • I didn’t block any comments from you, Scott. I am not sure why something you posted did not appear, but I didn’t block or delete anything and I don’t have anything from you pending review (which is something that WordPress does, not me).

      • Hello Justin Ames, your photography is unbelievably amazing, and it was through you that I first became aware of this site. There should be an entire wing in SF MOMA dedicated to your photos alone. Scott

    • I can vouch for Scott’s credibility and professionalism…We did a radio show on Jimi’s murder in San Francisco live in the studio in summer 2016 at KPOO…It is just that so much stupidity has been aimed at those who try to educate people about the truth in this matter that patience wears thin…There’s a high good evidence vs corruption and indifference ratio that creates a lot of potential energy…

  96. Buster and/or Scott please help me with piecing together the Monica timeline. She met Jimi in 1969 and if she was , indeed, a spook being infiltrated into Jimi’s inter sanctum , who then was her puppet master ? It seems that the Agency would be the more likely candidate than Jeffrey. MJ ,being Jimi’s manager, had unlimited and immediate access to him and it would seem redundant that Jeffrey would have to work someone in Jimi’s circle especially so far in advance of Hendrix’ death. So, if Monika was an Agency asset as opposed to a Jeffrey’s asset, wouldn’t Jeffrey be exonerated as the culprit ? It just seems to me that as the sequence of events unfolded, Jeffrey and the Agency would not be working in tandem. Monika’s involvement is undeniable but it seems like she would be an Agency asset rather than a MJ asset.

    • We’re obviously through the veil or looking glass when we get to this level…Shadows appear as real and ghosts interchange forms…Keep in mind Hendrix friends and office members said Jeffery was constantly trying to recruit them to spy on Jimi…In a way it doesn’t matter if it was Jeffery or CIA who controlled Monika, she was operating under their instruction and for their purposes and it played out directly the night Jimi died…The deeper you get in to this the more the level of covert practices involved with Monika suggests CIA sponsorship…The better you understand the evidence the more you realize that after Jimi fired Jeffery on the 17th CIA’s and Jeffery’s interests merged and became the same…However Jeffery had the immediate motive for murder – which, if you understand how CIA operates, would also be a sign of their classic manipulation and plausible deniability…It would not be in error to lay Jimi’s murder squarely on CIA’s doorstep…Jimi’s FBI file clearly shows an attempt to classify him for special handling..

    • I’ve read she met Jimi in 1969 and then reappeared again in London when Jimi was there as “his fiance in Sept ’70. Jimi had his own place to stay but yet he was over at her’s to “get away” from people. Odd behavior for Hendrix which is suspicious indeed.

  97. It is my understanding that author Tony Brown had a significant amount of information regarding Jimi’s death that was not released in his book, “Final Days”. Was he planning to write a new book which would have contained this information or perhaps update and re-release “Final Days ” ? Regardless, is anybody privy to this info ?

    • I tried to contact Tony’s wife Carol…My source told me some other Hendrix information managers tried to get Tony’s archives from Carol but she told them no…That she intended to place it in a dumpster because she considered Tony’s Hendrix interests responsible for their marriage problems…I guess someone should have tried to get a court injunction to keep her from doing that but apparently she succeeded…The woman was a criminal…Carol is since dead…You have to understand that in Britain there’s always the possibility that Carol was acting for other interests…I don’t know anything about any other information Brown intended to release, however from reading his book ‘Final Days’ I would assume he would have been the one to release the next book that would have covered Jimi’s murder…Especially after Tappy’s public admission…I believe the likelihood Tony Brown was murdered to be high because he existed in British jurisdiction and was a clear and present danger to those who killed Jimi because of his ability to force a case…These people had killed before…

      • Hi Buster
        I haven’t seen you on here for ages and I got a email the other day ..I am on the same email address j.brown96 if this is you buster can you send me a email
        Thank you
        Joyce

  98. Regarding the reliability of MS. Trixie Sullivan, I have less confidence. Number One: his name is Mike Jeffrey, not Jeffries. It is incredible how few people get his name right!
    Second: MS. Sullivan was Jeffrey’s ‘gal Friday’ and she never puts Jeffrey in a bad light. For example, she does not hesitate to contradict Buddy Miles regarding the Band of Gypsies Madison Square Garden concert, shifting blame towards Buddy, as if Jeffrey had done Jimi’s bidding by allegedly dosing Jimi and ruining the prrformance. I am curious what she would say regarding the supposed faux-abduction and rescue Jimi suffered, supposedly engineered by Jeffrey, according to David Henderson’s biography.

    • It was MS. Sullivan who confirmed that Jeffery was out of the country at the time of Jimi’s death. Jeffery never abducted Jimi that’s been a long untrue myth.

      • Just because Jeffery was out of the country doesn’t mean he didn’t arrange Jimi’s death…Jeffery was away and un-findable when Jimi got busted for heroin at Canadian customs…If anything, being away is a sign of Jeffery’s modus operandi…Jason…You make some very definite comments but appear to have very little credible background on this…I have researched the kidnappings extensively…Rolling Stone Magazine reporter Jerry Hopkins wrote about the kidnappings in his book…I interviewed office members and friends and they said the atmosphere in Jeffery’s office during the kidnapping was unserious to the point that it was suspicious….Even Jimi told people he thought Jeffery was behind the abductions…If you research the mafia Salvation Club no wannabee mobster would dare kidnap Jimi and try to coerce his contract without permission from mob higher-ups or they would be killed…You speak as if you know what you are talking about but credible research shows that Jeffery probably arranged the kidnapping just like he did the heroin bust in order to intimidate and control Jimi who was trying to get away from him…

      • MS. Sullivan and Bob Levine said Jeffery was out of the country. What’s so strange about that? That was the 60’s and 70’s. People didn’t have emails or cell phones then. Mobsters? Why are you talking mobsters? Are you saying Jimi was abducted by mobsters? Jeffery never abducted Jimi that’s been a long untrue myth.

      • Now Buster’s story changes. Buster first claimed that “Jeffery murdered Hendrix himself” to “Jeffery arranged Jimi’s death”. Which is it Buster? Big difference and total reversal from “Jeffery murdered Hendrix himself”. When these conspiracy theorists are proven wrong they add a new conspiracy like Buster has done. The phony claim of “Jeffery murdering Hendrix” by Tappy Wright was proven to be a lie cuz Jeffery was in Spain. Now comes a new phony claim from Buster that “Jeffery arranged Jimi’s death”. No proof of this exists but Buster spins a new conspiracy to keep this fairy tale going. Your case has already unraveled Buster.

  99. is there an official time that Jimi was seen leaving the party to where he went back to Monika’s flat and when she started phoning people or is it just speculation with no confirmed time?

    • Angie Burdon said that Jimi arrived at Pete Cameron’s party about 11.00 pm and Tony Brown has Jimi arriving back at the Samarkand about 3.00 am. Eric Burdon says he received a phone call in the early hours of the morning around dawn from Monika.

    • Jimi left at around 3AM and got back to the Samarkand about 10 minutes after 3…Dr Rufus Crompton, top coroner in Britain at the time, told Kathy Etchingham that the undigested rice in Jimi’s stomach at his autopsy showed Jimi died no later than 5:30am…This was uncannily accurate because it is the real time that Monika started calling people…Only fools don’t realize Monika called people because Jimi was dead – not because he was struggling…She then had to lie about the real time all this happened and push it ahead 5 hours to 11am in order to cover-up…Common sense tells you they would not have cleaned the flat for 5 hours with Jimi laying struggling and choking to death on the bed…Do us a favor Jason…Learn more about this before entering ignorant doubt…Jimi was killed by being force-drowned with wine and the undigested rice forensically locked-in the time for that at 5:30…Scotland Yard has been exerting its efforts to criminally avoid this instead of doing its trusted duty…They are no different than murdering Nazis in their corrupted complicity…Then and now…

      • Buster, don’t call me ignorant and not credible. That’s not cool. Everybody has the right to speak their mind on this page.

      • Jason – what is not cool here is having scant knowledge of what you are talking about, like you obviously do from your entries, and coming in and pretending you are on equal par with one of the foremost authorities on the subject..You first waded-in by defending Jeffery on the Toronto heroin bust…That bust and its motives are suspicious and even Jimi himself was quoted as telling people privately that Jeffery was behind it…You called people who intelligently analyzed this “kooks”…Next you spoke with one-line authority saying Jimi was never abducted…People who have researched this found that Jimi was kidnapped and Michael Jeffery almost certainly had something to do with it…Jeffery’s unholy relationship with the Gambino crime family Salvation Club mafia was documented when he used them to intimidate Jimi in to playing that mob-connected club that Jimi didn’t want to play…I have seen a video from an unreleased documentary of the actual Lucchese crime family members who were involved describing Jimi’s so-called rescue from this bogus kidnapping…There were other witnesses too…It is somewhat disingenuous to say this is an issue of “the right to speak one’s mind” when the clear issue here is your reckless denial of better-researched evidence and your failure to credibly respond to it…Your posts seem to be mocking some Jeffery-connected aspects of Jimi’s death and agreeing with others…You should learn about what you are talking about before offering public advice…

      • Buster, you’re one of foremost authorities on the subject? By reading the same books like others do? I disagree. Jeffery wouldn’t risk sending Jimi to prison for a decade on a set up. That makes no sense. Jeffery was out to make money. Not lose money on a risky drug bust that could go bad. Hendrix’s career would have been done. Jeffery had nothing to do with Jimi’s abduction. That’s been a long untrue myth. I read the story of who was behind it. Perhaps you should learn about what you are talking about before offering the wrong public advice.

  100. David Henderson writes in his book that Monika had friendships/relationships with other black musicians before Jimi came along. Monika states that Jimi went from table to table announcing their engagement at the Speakeasy in London but no-one could recall this occurring. Eric Burdon said to Kathy Etchingham that Monika would never give up trying to convince others that she was Jimi’s fiancé. I think Pat Hartley sums it up best when she said that Jimi was in love with his music. He enjoyed the company of women but I don’t think there was anyone serious.

  101. I have just finished reading an article titled the death of Jimi Hendrix. Jimi had 18 times the normal dosage of Vesperax in his system enough to render someone unconscious and seriously inhibit any coughing reflex. The ambulance officer Mr. Saua stated that there was dry black and brown vomit on Jimi’s clothing and pillow. Dr. Bannister is the only one to mention red wine, and this was said many years later. He also talks about Jimi being an unusually tall man. Noel Redding states that Jimi was not a tall man. According to the article Bob Levine questioned Tappy Wright about his claim that Jeffrey murdered Jimi and Wright admitted he made the whole thing up in order to sell books. Trixie Sullivan and Jim Marron both said Jeffrey was in Majorca Spain at the time of Jimi’s death. The article concludes with you can’t believe everything you see and hear can you?

      • Jason – What are your sources and reasoning for the absolute statement that there was no wine and only vomit?…I spoke to Dr Bannister personally and he told me that Jimi was drowned in at least 5 bottles of wine…He said when he opened Jimi’s mouth to resuscitate him that there was wine up to the throat…A clever detective would see that the amount of wine was wine that was poured in to Jimi until he could hold no more…This is called “overkill” in criminology to make sure the job was done…That same smart detective would realize that for wine to be up to the mouth would mean everything beneath it was flooded and that the volume of that flooding would be about 5 bottles of wine…Again, that same sharp detective would look at the wording of the ambulance men when they described the grotesque amount of vomit at the death scene as being “pools of vomit”…”Pools” suggest a liquid nature…

      • Buster, do you have a video of your interview with Dr. Bannister? Monika was the first one to talk about wine in Electric Gypsy. She said she wiped Jimi’s face with wine. Bannister read the book getting the wine idea from that. In 1993 Bannister talked about wine to cover himself cuz Monika said all the doctors should be sued for malpractice. That was a cover story. Where was the wine on September 18, 1970? Not a single person then said anything about wine.

      • What are my sources and reasoning of no wine and only vomit? Medical expertise and the determined cause of death. Inhalation of vomit cuz of a drug overdose. Bannister is the only one who talks of wine with no specific proof of what he says. What makes him more credible over anyone else?

      • 5 bottles of wine? That’s a lot of wine. Did Bannister alert the police about this? What did he do with the 5 bottles? Do you have a video of the Bannister interview?

    • Ivana – You have to be very careful about the source of any articles on Jimi’s death and their agenda…I have read that article and the author is not a credible source on Jimi’s death…What happened was some ballsy people who had a conflict of interest in being sources for Hendrix music, memorabilia, and photos didn’t want Jimi’s murder and its ugly consequences to mar their little corner of the Hendrix universe so they sold him down the river and wrote uncredible articles like the one you quoted to justify it…I’ve dealt with those people and I know who they are…They made no honest attempt to look at the evidence and were only looking for the excuses…I have extensively researched the subject and as damning as the 18 times the normal dose sounds medical science shows that it wasn’t enough to kill Jimi due to his famous tolerance…After Jimi’s death Monika hired some German doctors to see if her pills would have killed Jimi…They came back and said no exactly for the reasons I am citing here…9 Vesparax tablets was not enough barbiturate to reach lethal dose nor did Jimi have the pills in him long enough…If you read this thread you will see it has already been explained…It is false to say Dr Bannister was the only person to mention the red wine…Dr Bob Brown walked along side the gurney as it was wheeled in to the hospital and he said Jimi was beyond saving and had obviously had too much wine…The Chief Coroner in the London Coroner’s Office, Dr Gavin Thurston, told reporter Jack Meehan that “Jimi’s stomach contents showed that a large amount of red wine had been imbibed”…Lastly, a friend of mine recorded the second doctor, Dr Siefert, on video in the 1990’s saying Jimi was covered in red wine…After Tappy Wright’s book came out Siefert was then quoted as saying “I detected no alcohol on Jimi”…Siefert had obviously reversed because he realized his witnessing had become dangerous and he worked in the city where the government that was covering it up was based…Proof of the wine is seen in Scotland Yard’s failure to seek out the nurses when Kathy Etchingham petitioned them to re-open the case…What was their reason for never even interviewing Dr Banister?…I was a personal friend of Bob Levine and a few months before his death I video-ed him saying he suspected Jeffery in Jimi’s death…The bogus writer of the misleading article you quoted failed to inform you that Bob Levine came out in the 1990 book ‘Setting The Record Straight’ and listed reasons why he suspected Jeffery in Jimi’s death…Tappy said he spoke to Bob about Jeffery’s confession when it happened and Bob responded “You better keep your mouth shut”…

      • Thanks for your post Ivana. Tin foil hatter like Buster don’t like when their phony claims are refuted by facts. They become defensive and go on the attack attacking your credibility and the facts that refute their garbage. You can see that in all Buster’s posts.

        Buster attacks the facts and offer a fairy tale spin of his own fallacies to defend his phony conspiracy theory.

        Buster makes up the fabricated lie that Jimi Hendrix was an “immortal Superman” to drug tolerance withstanding any size amount. This is the biggest bunch of bunk he tries to sell. Dr. Rufus Crompton and any medical expert would agree that 18 times the amount is a lethal dosage for any human known to mankind. Buster sells this nonsense cuz it refutes his phony murder claim where he needs his imaginary wine to be the cause of Hendrix’s death. They will fight tooth and nail to claim drugs were not lethal to Hendrix.

        Buster now lies with more fabricated claims and makes up stuff that doesn’t exist.

        Dr. Gavin Thurston never said never said “that a large amount of wine was imbibed.” That was a second hand quote from Sharon Lawrence’s book where she is already guilty of making up quotes.

        Dr. Martin Siefert never said Hendrix was “covered in red wine”. Siefert said “there was a good bit of mess/” “Mess” does not indicate wine. Hendrix had vomit all over him. That is “mess”. Quit lying Buster. Siefert later confirmed he saw no alcohol on Hendrix.

        Bob Levine never stated Hendrix was murdered. Bob defended Jeffery in several interviews stating Jeffery was innocent.

        Tappy Wright is a lying fraud so more lying quotes from him is a joke.

  102. But was Michael Jeffery really in Spain?

    In McDermott & Kramer’s HENDRIX: SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT Bob Levine is quoted with regard to Jeffery’s whereabouts.

    pp. 287-288:

    “Back in New York, the question of Jeffery’s whereabouts remained unanswered. ‘We tried calling all of Jeffery’s contacts – from [his club] Sgt. Pepper’s to the Hotel Victoria in Majorca – trying to reach him,’ remembers Bob Levine. ‘We were getting frustrated because Hendrix’s body was going to be held up in London for two weeks and we wanted Jeffery’s input on the funeral service. A full week after Hendrix’s death, he finally called. Hearing his voice, I immediately asked what his plans were and would he be going to Seattle. ‘What plans?’ he asked. I said, ‘The funeral.’ ‘What funeral?’ he replied. I was exasperated: ‘Jimi’s!’ The phone went quiet for a while and then he hung up. The whole office was staring at me, unable to believe that with all of the coverage on radio, print and television, Jeffery didn’t know that Jimi had died. He called back in five minutes and we talked quietly. He said, ‘Bob, I didn’t know,’ and was asking about what had happened. While I didn’t confront him, I knew he was lying because I had spoken to people who saw him at a party Track Records had staged in London the night before Hendrix died. I knew everybody who had attended, from Douglas’s pair – Stella and Colette– to Devon, as well as friends from Harold Davison’s office. It was impossible for him to have slipped incognito into Spain without hearing about Jimi’s death.”

    Whether this is an accurate report or not, it seems clear that John McDermott and Eddie Kramer do not generally partake in this conversation.

    Since Buster commented on this in 2011, he has had more insight into the matter, I’m sure.

  103. What I have a problem with are posthumous accusations regarding Jeffrey’ s involment in Jimi’s death. These suspicions should have been raised while he was alive. With various people making accusations against Jeffrey I am surprised that his estate or the Hendrix family for that matter did not seek legal advice. Perhaps posthumous defamation laws differ.

      • Jason seems to be all over the place…In one post he’s saying the evidence is highly suspicious and in another he’s issuing one-liner absolutes saying there’s no evidence…No serious researcher defends Michael Jeffery or says he’s the victim of false accusations…The best evidence makes it pretty apparent that Jimi fired Jeffery in front of Monika at about 5pm on Thursday the 17th and was dead 12 hours later under mysterious circumstances with everyone lying…What I have a problem with are persons ignoring a full case of evidence lengthily explained in a website comments section and coming back and pretending they are credibly addressing the issue…The Hendrix estate ended up with Al Hendrix and his lawyer Leo Branton…Al was an uneducated landscape maintenance man who was mainly interested in not being ripped-off of what little money Jeffery didn’t steal…It wasn’t really a fair battle with Jimi’s friends all betraying him and not speaking up…A fair evaluation is Jeffery knew the governments involved would back him up and he knew how to intimidate people…It isn’t really a genuine suggestion to say the same governments that were involved in the cover-up were going to honestly respond to inquiries…Meanwhile Kathy Etchingham had managed to reveal some shocking new evidence and she DID ask the government to answer it…So why didn’t they?…

      • Buster, Jeffery was confirmed to be in Spain by two people. He couldn’t have killed Hendrix. That is an absolute. The accusation against him is inaccurate. That’s what I’m saying. It’s pretty apparent you say? Should you know for sure before you go hurling accusations against people? That’s not credible research as far as I’m concerned.

      • Jason – it is clear to me that you know very little about this…It is silly to try and use word games to get around Jeffery’s obvious motive…Just because Jeffery wasn’t there doesn’t mean he didn’t have Jimi killed by others…The method of murder points to Jeffery because as a member of British Military Intelligence he would know how to kill covertly in order to make it appear as an accidental drug and alcohol overdose…Jeffery had the motive because Jimi fired him 12 hours before his death with everyone lying…Jeffery would have done jail time or been killed himself for leading Jimi’s lawyers back to the money Jeffery stole and where it was kept…And it is very likely Jeffery was also killed for the same reason…Saying Jeffery was in Spain as a response to all of the above is rather weak…

      • Buster, it is very hard to have a case when your main suspect was in Spain confirmed by two sources. How does that explain Tappy Wright’s story?

      • Buster is spinning this really hard. Why is it “rather weak” to say Jeffery was in Spain Buster? It is a fact Jeffery was in Spain. Do you not deal with the facts? Seems to me you only dabble in false claims to support your fake murder conspiracy. Buster claims it is “rather weak” to say Jeffery was in Spain cuz it weakens his fake murder conspiracy. Sorry, there was no “murder” and nothing points to Jeffery except innuendos by you that cannot be proven. Jeffery had no motive or the means to arrange a “long distance murder in a span of 12 hours. The British intelligence nonsense and the accusation that Jimi fired him is fake as well with no proof. Nothing but fake claims that don’t exist. Sorry.

        Michael Jeffery was the victim of a false accusation Buster. Tappy Wright made a false accusation against Michael Jeffery to sell his book. Tappy Wright admitted he lied about Jeffery murdering Hendrix. Is that not a false accusation in your eyes? You’re obviously not a serious researcher since you deny this important fact. Even you admitted Jeffery was in Spain but added a new conspiracy that “Jeffery arranged Jimi’s death” with no facts or proof. So, let’s see the facts Buster. Show us how “Jeffery arranged Jimi’s death” as you claim with some evidence. You’re a “serious researcher” as you claim so you should have this evidence? Correct?

  104. Bob Levine interview for Music Radar 2011. “ despite the allegations that have recently been made, I need to set the record straight once and for all. Jimi died an accidental death, but he was definitely not murdered- not by Michael Jeffrey, his UK manager, and certainly not by anyone connected to him. The whole thing is one giant lie.” The Attorney General could not find any incriminating new evidence to add to the story. The problem was with Monika’s ever changing story, and her defamatory statements about Kathy Etchingham. It would seem that these things sealed her fate. Later on the Hendrix family did very well for themselves in business due to Jimi’s catalogue.

    • Ivana – If you weren’t ignoring everything I’m writing and just fishing for denial quotes from Bob Levine you would understand that Bob Levine was over in New York when Jimi died…He was the type of guy who didn’t want to get involved and if giving the media a quote that Jimi wasn’t murdered was what they wanted to hear he would say it…However I had several years of private conversations about the evidence with Bob and he started to realize it was real…He told me in one phone call that I should take my evidence to the FBI…If you had a better grasp of this you would realize that Bob gave detailed descriptions in the book ‘Setting The Record Straight’ that couldn’t be denied so easily…The reporters who got those quotes from Bob were only looking for those quotes and nothing else…They should have asked Bob about his previous statements in ‘Setting The Record Straight’…Who was the journalist for Music Radar and how much real research did he do?…If the British Attorney General Nicholas Lyle could not find any new evidence it was probably because he wasn’t looking…I mean how dare you write that when one look at Kathy Etchingham’s petition to Lyle shows that she proved Monika was lying about the times involved by about as much as 6 hours…If you studied this better and read Kathy’s book she wrote that the police detectives who interviewed the main witnesses came back and told her “every one of them is lying”…Lyle lied…The evidence Etchingham discovered exposed the true timeline of that evening and the fact Jimi died at 5:30am according to famous London pathologist Rufus Crompton…If you input the forensics at Jimi’s autopsy in to that true timeline it proves homicide…All you are doing is quoting the liars and people covering-up Ivana…I befriended Bob Levine right after that Music Radar interview for the last 5 years of his life and here is his real opinion on Jeffery and his involvement in Jimi’s death…Watch it and you will see how persons like yourself have worked directly against Jimi Hendrix and his interests and misled the public on his death: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eSp1DPjp_k&t=15s

    • Ivana, Bob Levine did set the record straight. He refuted and exposed Tappy Wright’s lies. Tappy Wright was another fraudster con artist who made up lies against Jeffery to make money off Hendrix. Aleem Twins fake story of waking up on a couch to hear Jeffery and Monika plotting evil deeds was even worse. Tin foil hatters use their lying quotes to compile their fake murder conspiracy. It’s all a big fat joke.

      Bob Levine sets the record straight about Rock Roadie

      By Bob Merlis

      I want to set the record straight. Michael Jeffery was the Animals manager. He hired me to be their US tour manager. I was with Chas Chandler when he saw Jimi at the Cafe Wha before he took him to London. I had met Jimi once before but never knew it. I broke up a fight backstage between Jimmy and Little Richard a year or so before at the Paramount Theatre [New York, April 1965] and didn’t realize it had been him until he told me that he had met me before. He recalled the fight and I couldn’t believe it.

      Michael Jeffery and Chas Chandler formed a company [Jeffery & Chandler, Inc.] hereafter and hired me [in early 1968] to run their US office (on 37th Street in New York). James “Tappy” Wright was the roadie for the Animals but occasionally he filled in to work in that same role for Jimi in UK/Europe before Eric Barrett was hired [in May 1968]. Gerry Stickells was the road manager for Jimi for his entire career. No one else.

      Tappy was a longtime friend and it was only because of that I agreed to speak with him for his book [Rock Roadie]. In all of the years since Jimi’s death I have only granted interviews about my work for Jimi to John McDermott and to Tappy.

      I didn’t think anything further about Tappy’s book project until I started to get calls attempting to verify what he said. I couldn’t even read his book because I am now legally blind and it is difficult for me to read small type. I couldn’t believe what people were telling me. Jimi was murdered!!?? Total bullshit.

      I had someone read the book to me and I was furious. He basically used my name on every third page. I called Tappy up at the end of last year. “Why did you tell that [“murdered by manager”] story?” “Well, Bob, I needed a handle for my book.” I asked him why he made up all of the other crap throughout the book and Tappy told me, point blank: “Bob, I needed a handle! People don’t know me or understand how I can tell the story.”

      I asked Tappy directly: “How did you get this information?” He said he spoke to the retired Medical Examiner [John Herbert Bannister; see footnote #2] in Australia. I find that totally far fetched. [Tappy] told me that it wouldn’t matter; none of this would hurt Jimi and Michael any. They were dead and the press would pick up on the controversy. It would help sell books for him. He felt that nobody would challenge him on this because all of the key players were now deceased. I was furious at this attitude….

      I was in touch with Michael Jeffery on the 17th of September 1970 to discuss the schedule for Electric Lady Studios. I called him at “Hotel Victoria” in Majorca, Spain. I called from my office at the studio. We spoke about many things including Jimi returning to Electric Lady Studios and how we were going to schedule sessions for Carly Simon. Carly was going to be working with Eddie [Kramer] in Studio A and Michael and I needed to discuss how this was going to be managed so that there would be no conflicts with Jimi and Eddie for recording time.

      We went over a bunch of things but I clearly remember that this was something we spoke about. Electric Lady was starting to get busy with outside clients and we knew we had to manage Jimi’s time so that there would not be any conflicts. We didn’t want him coming back to finish the record and not be able to get into the studio or have Eddie tied up with someone else and not be available to him.

      Before we finished the call, Michael told me that he had planned to go boating the next day. At this very time Jimi was in London and that is where he met his demise.

      Jeffery would have had to have been in two countries at once and he was not. Jimi was like a goldmine. The notion that he was more valuable to him dead is utterly ridiculous… [Jimi] was loyal even if he was unhappy with decisions that Michael may or may not have made.

      Jimi and I were close. We understood one another. I will give you one example. When I had the flu and couldn’t get out of bed, Jimi came to the door and served me. He was that kind of a guy. Very caring. He trusted me and I admired and respected him as a musician. As a person, he was a great guy to be around; he cared so much about the world. He was a very unmaterialistic guy. He was a great guy; many people didn’t get to know him that way.

      It’s so unfair to put this guy in the middle of a made-up story. I was angry with that crap Charles Cross tried to put over in his book [Room Full Of Mirrors: A Biography Of Jimi Hendrix] but this Tappy business takes the cake. Don’t believe a word of it!

      • Jason I had decided not to post anymore comments but thanks for your reply. Too many people, I think, hold on to already disproven “truths” in regards to Jimi’s life and death. What I dislike the most is people coming out with downright lies about Jimi and his personnel decades later. To often it seems hearsay, gossip, innuendo rules the day.

  105. This interview is more about Caesar Glebeek. Bob Levine says maybe, it’s possible Jeffrey was involved. He also says it happened a long time ago and he does not want to relive the past. I have a problem with the interviewer who tries to get Bob Levine to talk about Jeffrey and his supposed involvement in Jimi’s death. I don’t find anything in this interview that is startling. We all know Monika called the ambulance five hours later; this information is not new. As I have said previously Monika kept changing her story about the time she woke up and noticed Jimi was in trouble. The problem with any new investigation would be that the main players are all dead. At least Kathy tried along with Michael Fairchild and Dee Mitchell to get to the bottom of what really occurred that morning. Kathy does not buy into Jeffrey having anything to do with Jimi’s death. She states this in a radio interview.

    • Ivana, what you say about Kathy “not buying into Jeffery having anything to do with Jimi’s death” is true. BUT, what Kathy isn’t aware of, is what Albert Allen (him and his twin brother Arthur are known today as the Aleem Twins) witnessed at Electric lady Studios right after Jimi had died that proved the collusion between Monika Dannemann and Mike Jeffery. This info can be found in the Aleem Twins book “Ghetto Fighters in Harlem World” and completely overrules Kathy’s beliefs regarding Mike Jeffery.

      • Someone’s accusation is more powerful than Kathy who did serious research and knew the man personally? Aleem twins were out to cash in on a book. Kathy’s research and knowing him personally trumps that. Sounds like you’re being biased against Kathy to protect your own personal beliefs.

      • Jason — sounds like you are talking out of your anal sphincter just like Scott Thompson said. The Aleem Twins knew Jimi personally before and after his rise to stardom and for a lot longer than Kathy did. Sounds like your biased towards the Twins to protect YOUR personal beliefs & what they say about Jeffery doesn’t fit your phony narrative. What one of the Twins witnessed at Electric Lady Studios shortly after Jimi died trumps Kathy’s beliefs about Jeffery. And you’ve ignored the fact that Buster had spoken directly to the Twins.

      • Jason – you forfeit credibility when you paint the Allen Twins as only wanting to cash in by selling a book…Kathy only goes as far as Monika and goes no further…In no way is Kathy end-all proof that Jeffery is innocent…But your opinion of the Allen Twins is way off the mark…Have you even read their book?…Those brothers are just the opposite of only interested in the money and are some of the most dedicated and reverent of Jimi’s personal friends…If you read their book and knew of them and their thoughts towards Jimi you would know that they appreciate Jimi at a deeper spiritual level that Kathy seems to miss all together…What you are doing there is accusing Albert Allen of lying and making up a story in order to sell a book…You just put yourself outside of the game because anyone who knows Albert would know he was telling the truth and would be one of the last people to make up something like that…Not only that but there are other events connected to his witnessing that confirm it…For instance Albert identified the photographs Monika took at the Samarkand of Jimi before they came out, proving his witnessing was true…Plus Monika herself wrote of that visit to Jeffery at that time but it wasn’t made public until her book came out in 1995…I’m afraid the bias comes from Kathy’s side and she is reticent to accuse the British government…

      • No need for petty insults Flyswatter. I had no idea Buster spoke to them. Jimi knowing the Aleem Twins for a lot longer than Kathy doesn’t make them more credible. Is that what a serious researcher measures credibility on? I don’t think so. No way Jose. That’s a joke. Kathy was busy getting the facts to reopen Jimi’s case while the Aleem twins were writing fiction. Facts trumps fiction. Joker claims he woke up from a nap on a couch right when Jeffery and Monika were plotting evil deeds. C’mon. Give me a friggin break. Total fake story there.

      • Buster, I disagree. Kathy has the facts and the personal experience of knowing Jeffery. Aleem has only a story to tell with nobody else to confirm if it’s true. Everybody told a story for a book to cash in. Kathy just went on evidence and facts. Kathy’s evidence is what shed light on the whole case. if not for her we would have been in the dark about most everything that day.

      • No Jason — you really are talking out of your anal sphincter & I don’t care if your feelings are hurt by having that fact pointed out to you. All you are offering are the proverbial stupid one-line dismissals & if you were to say those things directly to TaHarqa Aleem’s face (he was known to Jimi as Albert Allen), he would very quickly straighten you out. What he witnessed can’t be made up. Your stupid one-line dismissal of “fake story” is just that, because it doesn’t fit your narrative and you can’t refute it or prove it false. Several people were told of this witnessing right away, including Buzzy Linhart, who made reference to it long before the Twins published their book, same as what was told to Roger Pomphrey in 1997.

        Buster never said that Kathy’s research didn’t shed light on the Jimi Hendrix death case. What he said was “In no way is Kathy end-all proof that Jeffery is innocent”. You are ripping things out of context there.

        All your posts are proving is that aren’t knowledgeable or credible to the subject at all. But, by all means, keep them coming because I can always use a good laugh & will have no problem refuting them — just like I’ve already done with your “no wine” narrative by showing that it wasn’t Dr. Bannister that first made reference to red wine, it was Gavin Thurston (try looking down).

      • In my opinion Jason is an “internet expert” who knows nothing about the subject and has done no research…From reading his posts what Jason is doing is saying his strawman-like forcing of direct quotes from Tappy can be used to deny the rest of the evidence that he ignores when shown…It is a cheap and dishonest argument method that is designed to get around answering the real evidence that Jason ignores once he thinks up the excuse to do so…If you read Kathy Etchingham’s book she only knew Jeffery through interactions of getting checks for her flat from him or other sundry interactions with him by being Jimi’s girlfriend…She didn’t really know Jeffery…Not nearly as well as Tappy who was hired by Jeffery and knew him directly from Newcastle where they both originated from…Kathy’s whole viewpoint on Jeffery is formed by the fact she won’t go past Monika or accuse the British government…Meanwhile we have plenty of proof in this thread that Jason is ignoring evidence when shown…People close to Jeffery suspected he had something to do with Jimi’s death…Jason: Why did Jeffery pretend to Bob Levine that he hadn’t heard Jimi was dead a week after his death?…Why did Michael lay low in Spain for the week after Jimi’s death?…Jason – If you publicly insult Albert Allen and the rest of the Hendrix community that know Albert is a dead serious, credible player who would never lie about something like that if it involved his friend Jimi, and ignore the evidence that Albert is telling the truth – like the Samarkand photos he described that had not been released publicly by Monika, then you are lowering yourself to the level of ignorable internet troll…Albert is telling the truth about what he witnessed and it predates Kathy’s investigation which happened on the other side of the Atlantic and can’t be used to deny Albert’s witnessing…Jason is all over the place and is sort of inferring that his crude canard of disproving Tappy’s exact words somehow debunks the rest of our evidence – including the slam-dunk forensic evidence that proves homicide…We’ve proven somebody murdered Jimi in the forensic and circumstantial evidence…And it wasn’t Monika…Jimi had just fired Jeffery 12 hours earlier and Jeffery would have done jail time or gotten killed once his books were examined…Anyone who calls Albert Allen a joker who is trying to cash in is a fool who has dismissed their own credibility in their desperate denial…

      • Do you always speak for Buster Flyswatter? I’m laughing at you since you think The Aleem Twins knowing Jimi longer than Kathy makes them more credible.

        I don’t need Kathy to state “end all proof that Jeffery is innocent”. Tappy Wright already made that possible when he admitted he lied about Jeffery cuz he was in Spain.

        I would gladly say that TaHarqa Aleem is a fraud and con artist right to his face. Same guy who made up a fake story for a book. Same guy who claimed Jimi gave him two prized guitars in 1969. Same guy who sued Janie Hendrix so he could steal Jimi’s guitars and auction them off to the highest bidders. Another fraud who wants to cash in on Hendrix’s name. Some good friend he is.

        Buzzy Linhart is not a very reliable source. Claimed in a book that he spoke with Devon Wilson on the phone telling him Jimi took too many Tuinals out of the medicine cabinet and OD’d. He also published the b.s. “couch story” which is a joke. More phony claims from these people that can’t be sourced. Not real evidence when you are quoting dead people who cant confirm if it’s true..

        Sorry, but you haven’t refuted anything I said. Bannister is the only person to claim he saw lungs with wine which no other person has .

        You have a reading comprehension problem Flyswatter. Monika was the first person to mention wine. Bannister then talked about lungs with wine after reading Electric Gypsy since he needed a cover story cuz he was being sued for malpractice. Dr. Gavin Thurston never spoke of wine. It was Sharon Lawrence who gave that second hand quote in her book with that can’t be confirmed. She is already guilty of making up quotes in her book like the phony one of Jimi’s mother. Sharon is not credible. Brush up on your Jimi Hendrix research.

      • No Jason, I speak the truth. You only speak fabricated BS. Simple as that. And my reading skills are just fine. It’s yours that need serious work.

    • I can’t take your response as sincere Ivana and you are obviously only seeking denials…I am the interviewer in that video…The true context of that interview is European Hendrix archivist Caesar Gleebeek had written a book entitled ‘Until We Meet Again’ where he highlighted your quotes of Bob Levine…Caesar concluded his publication with the summation: “If you don’t believe me listen to Jimi’s manager Bob Levine”…Caesar then quoted Bob as saying it was all bullshit and Jimi wasn’t murdered…If you don’t find anything startling in Levine countering everything you and Caesar misrepresented by saying he suspected Jeffery in Jimi’s death then you are not really being honest and I have a problem with that…The true context of Bob Levine is I was the only person I know of to ever go to him and brief him on the evidence…Bob complimented me and said I was impressively knowledgeable…After finally having the evidence told to him he told me I should take my evidence to the FBI and then said “I guess Jimi really was murdered”…You show disqualifying disconcern to the point of uncredibility when you brush off Monika’s lying about the time of death…I’m sorry but to qualify for a credible opinion on this you have to live up to professional standards and those professional standards require that those admitted missing 5 hours then be calculated in to the witnessing and, more importantly, forensics…You seem to be ignorant of the fact that once you process those missing 5 hours and the true time of death in to the autopsy forensics it proves homicide on a forensic basis for reasons I’ve already explained in detail in this thread…What those missing 5 hours reflect is a 5:30am time of death and therefore 2 hour golden window for Jimi having the pills inside him…Caesar Glebbeek found the product manufacturer’s information for the Vesparax as well as the Underwriter’s Laboratory case histories for overdoses and found that people who took 10 to 15 tablets did not die in less than 4 hours…Since Monika’s exposed lie proves Jimi could only have had the pills in him for 2 hours max, and the 1850mg of barbiturate found in Jimi at autopsy proved he didn’t nearly have enough barbiturate in him to overdose, that proves homicide and proves he was drowned in wine because the forensics disprove any other cause…I’m afraid that’s proof you have failed to live up to in your entries and must be recognized and discussed in order to have a credible discussion…I know Kathy…What she says privately and publicly are two different things…As much good as she has done it is my opinion that she only goes as far as Monika for personal political reasons…She’s not helping Jimi by doing that…And you can’t use the main players being dead as an excuse because the things I cite are correct quotes from them and backed by the official record…

    • Ivana, Kathy was the only decent person in the bunch. Kathy did extensive investigative research trying to find out what really happened to Jimi. She rejects the false accusations of Michael Jeffery murdering Jimi. She wasn’t out to cash in on his name making up false lies. All these other people like Tappy Wright, Aleem Twins, Sharon Lawrence etc. used Jimi to cash in on money based on lies. They are all fraudsters and con artists. Kathy’s quote refutes Buster’s falsehood of her hardly knowing Jeffery. Kathy’s quote proves Buster wrong claiming Kathy just got checks from Jeffery in a passing moment. Michael Jeffery, Jimi, and Kathy were a tight knit group.

      “I think Mike Jeffery has had a bad press, quite frankly. We used to go up to Mike Jeffery’s flat in Jermyn Street, me and Jimi. He had a wife called Jill. He used to have us in stitches. We were practically falling on the floor with laughter. He was so funny. Never, ever did he talk about, ‘You’ve got to do this, or you’ve got to do that’. He just used to tell amusing tales and everything. Yes, he did rip them off, but then lots of people ripped off bands in those days.” – Kathy Etchingham

      • Kathy’s quote doesn’t mean squat, except the part about Jeffery ripping Jimi off & Jimi came to realize just how extensive that was after he had parted ways with Kathy, plus Kathy was nowhere in the vicinity when things really started to heat up between Jeffery and Jimi in mid-1969. Juma Sultan was there & he talked quite extensively about how Jimi had expressed to him directly that he was dissatisfied with Jeffery’s management.

        You’re just regurgitating pure nonsense when you accuse the Aleem Twins and Sharon Lawrence using Jimi to cash in on lies & calling them fraudsters. Anyone can easily see that you are doing that because you can’t directly answer or refute their testimonies that shoot down your false narratives. And you can’t prove Tappy’s claim to be false, either.

        The real fraudster here is somebody like you trying to sell himself as being knowledgeable and credible to the subject. You clearly aren’t.

      • The tin foil hatters like Buster and Flyswatter only can say you are “not credible” when you prove them wrong. Weak and pathetic. Kathy’s quote proves Buster wrong. Buster made a false claim that Kathy hardly knew Jeffery. She knew him well. Buster is wrong. Kathy’s quote means a lot. She knew Jeffery well enough to know he isn’t capable of murder. Kathy refutes Jeffery murdering Hendrix. Jeffery was in Spain so he couldn’t have killed Hendrix.

        Tappy Wright already proved his own claim to be false when he admitted he made the whole thing up to sell his useless book. Bob Levine also proved Tappy Wright to be a con artist. Jeffery was in Spain so Tappy Wright lied to sell a book. Aleem Twins and Sharon Lawrence made money off Jimi Hendrix under false conditions with phony claims. That is a fact. You are selling a lie using lies to support your fake murder claim.

      • LOL — gotta love these lying-denying pig-breeders like Jason that wallow in their pig doo-doo mire of denial of reality. The tin foil hat that Jason speaks of belongs only on Jason’s head because all he has done is urinate on his own head & tell himself that it is raining, as evidenced by his statement of “Aleem Twins and Sharon Lawrence made money off Jimi Hendrix under false conditions with phony claims”. All that is one of Jason’s patented one-dismissals with nothing to substantiate it.

        Jason has not provided any substance to refute the medical evidence that Jimi was a homicide victim that has already been posted in abundance. Jason has not proven one single thing that I’ve posted to be wrong, but tries to make the false claim that he’s proven me false. No Jason, you haven’t refuted one single thing that I’ve posted — not once. Just stupid one-line dismissals that don’t prove anything is all you’ve came up with.

      • Jason probably doesn’t realize his transparent denial works more in our favor than anything…It is kind of obvious that Jason is a troll who is trying to force Kathy Etchingham’s woman-like evasions to be the one and only final decider…But he can’t get away with that because there’s just too much other incriminating evidence against Jeffery that Jason himself is obviously trying to avoid…There’s nothing in that quote of Kathy that serves as proof Jeffery was innocent…A more responsible analyst would realize Kathy is speaking of a time early on in his career when Jimi was cooperating with Jeffery and trying to make it in England…It is also ridiculous to suggest Jeffery was going to discuss ugly business matters with Jimi at those private parties…It is painfully obvious to me that both Kathy and Jason are aware of the mortal implications of Jeffery’s later interactions with Jimi and, typical of Kathy, that is why they refer to this irrelevant reference in order to convince themselves of something they both know is untrue…It is so obvious that it actually works for us instead of against us, as Jason falsely suggests…

        Jason’s attempt to canonize Kathy and make her word holy while vilifying every other witness and making them dirty opportunists isn’t working and grinds against the real facts any good research would uncover…Truth is Tappy had a close relationship to Jeffery and access to the things he wrote about that Kathy did not…Whether Jason ignores or denies that makes no difference…Jason is lying when he says Sharon Lawrence and Albert Allen “cashed-in” on falsehoods…Anyone who knows Sharon Lawrence knows she is just the opposite of that description…Sharon is infamous amongst Hendrix researchers for hostile avoidance of any involvement in the issue…As far as I know she didn’t make any money off her book and if you read the book itself she said she was reluctantly talked in to publishing it…As far as Albert Allen the same thing goes…Only a person who has no credible knowledge or understanding of the Hendrix world would dare accuse Albert Allen of lying about his witnessing at Electric Lady to make money…If you know anything about the Twins, Jimi was like religion to them and they would never lie about such a thing…Jason ignores this and repeats the claim harder…The reason Jason does that is because he is a troll who can’t back off one bit from his cheap denial or otherwise it will quickly become apparent that he is full of it and can’t allow any real truth to enter his ridiculous defense of Michael Jeffery…Those who have researched this deeply know that Kathy is avoiding any accusations past Monika and that is how she is…They also know that Sharon Lawrence had no interest in cashing-in and was just the opposite in her irrational avoidance of the subject…Sharon witnessed something very important…She witnessed Monika moaning in to the telephone for 20 seconds when asked about the wine…She then witnessed Monika making up a quick excuse for that wine by saying she washed vomit off Jimi’s face with wine…But we know that was a lie because the ambulance men said no vomit was washed off Jimi’s face…Monika moaned because she knew the wine was used to murder Jimi…Then in a very few short seconds Albert Allen accidentally stumbled in to witnessing the true context of what happened at the Samarkand…

        Anyone reading this please notice that I have informed Jason of a video interview I did with Bob Levine where he said he suspected Jeffery in Jimi’s death…I have also more than adequately referenced the book ‘Setting The Record Straight’, which contained Bob’s first original words on the subject…In that book Bob made it more than clear that Jeffery was suspicious in Jimi’s death…There are also other witnesses to Albert Allen’s witnessing who seriously corroborated its realness…Additionally, I have had private phone conversations with Kathy where I discussed the evidence that pointed to Jeffery and she indirectly agreed but then said she didn’t want to get involved…

        After doing woefully dishonest defamation against the real witnesses, and using an obvious out of context evasive quote from Kathy, Jason then goes on to use this cheap denial to claim the murder evidence is invalid…However he never once attempts to touch my more than clearly spelled-out forensic evidence in this thread…You can’t have 5 bottles of wine inside you while only having a 5mg blood alcohol content…It is medically impossible and you won’t be able to find any other real accidental overdose choking on vomit victims that had those forensic particulars…Jason tried his defamation on Dr Bannister saying he is a liar, however when we proved Dr Siefert was caught saying Jimi was covered in wine and then saying he detected no alcohol on Jimi Jason ignored it…Jason also ignored Dr Thurston saying Jimi’s stomach was full of red wine and tried to get out of it by saying Sharon Lawrence was trying to cash-in…No Jason – you can’t get away with that…You’re obviously a contemptuous denier who is trying to use cheap name-calling to get around the facts that you never quite get around to credibly answering…

      • Buster writes a looooong essay heavy on defensiveness, lies, and denial with no evidence and only innuendo.

        Buster has been proven to be a lair claiming Kathy hardly knew Jeffery. Kathy’s own quote shows Buster to be a liar. Kathy knew Jeffery well. Buster attacks Kathy’s credibility because she shows that Jeffery was close with her and Jimi. Kathy believes Jeffery didn’t kill Hendrix as tin foil hatters like Buster claims. Buster has no answer for this and can only make up innuendos out of thin air against Jeffery. Buster is not very credible.

        Buster is ignorant enough to think Sharon Lawrence would write a book and not accept money for writing it. Who would do that? Lawrence’s book is riddled with false claims and dramatic events to appeal to the reader. She claimed Jimi was born at a family friend’s house instead of King County Hospital where he was born. Lawrence made up some fake quote in her book claiming Jimi’s mother said to him before she passed away. Same woman who lied under oath in Toronto perjuring herself. Same woman who auctioned off empty cigarette packs claiming it was Jimi’s to cash in on his name. Buster is the liar here and ignorant of what this woman has done. Who would believe anything this woman claims in her book when she is a liar and cashed in on Hendrix. That’s right, Buster would.

        Bob Levine never confirmed Jeffery murdered Hendrix anywhere. Bob Levine said in several interviews the murder claim was bullshit. Same phony claim of flooding lungs with wine by Buster that nobody can account for except for Bannister’s word. His word is no good cuz he is a convicted fraud. Thurston never said anything about Jimi’s stomach full of red wine. He didn’t even state that in his final report.

        Buster’s lies and claims of false innuendos falls flat on his face cuz he has no evidence of wine or a murder. Buster only has false claims of what his fraud sources tells him from made up quotes and innuendos. Where is all this damning evidence Buster? Where is this evidence of a murder and lungs with wine besides your made up one sourced quotes that there is no evidence of?

      • Part of the reason Flyswatter and myself are active on the internet posting the correct evidence is because of a small core of dedicated deniers like Jason who showed a rabid commitment to opposing the true facts on Jimi’s death…I guess I should thank Jason because the out-dated simple denials he posts are part of what led us to develop the evidence to the degree we have…A smart person will see that Jason’s phony act depends on calling just about all the witnesses to the murder evidence opportunists or liars and also defending Michael Jeffery – a notorious crook and dangerous manager…Jason is no friend of Jimi Hendrix…He’s a friend of his murderers…I have found in my years of arguing on the internet that if you argue well you can get trolls to out themselves…Good argument and truth is like cryptonite to trolls and if you do it well those trolls inevitably can’t resist going in to their troll dance like Jason does here right on cue…

        The simple answer to Jason’s crude denial is to get Kathy Etchingham to discuss the evidence for Jeffery’s guilt…She won’t do it because she knows there’s more to it than the out of context quote Jason disingenuously tries to force against everything else…I know this is true because of the personal phone calls I have had with Kathy that Jason is ignoring…She is quite aware that there’s more to it than what Jason quotes…She just doesn’t want to get involved…Jason is just a cheap denier…Anyone who really knows the Hendrix community and the players in this knows what I describe about Kathy is the correct version…The reason Jason is so desperate to force an irrelevant quote from 1967 is because he’s trying to avoid discussing the facts from 1969 and 1970…Jason is using this wholly disingenuous troll screed to avoid mentioning that anyone with a speck of credibility realizes Kathy is majorly responsible for uncovering the evidence Jimi was murdered, as her investigation and book detailed…This con man Jason is trying to convince the public that we’re all nuts and Kathy is a source for the murder theory being bogus…However behind his classic always being on the offensive trolling Jason hopes the public doesn’t notice he omits Kathy’s exposing of the murder evidence for which she is well known…

        Another thing that exposes these trolls is the fact they play dumb and pretend not to know any of the murder evidence…However anyone can see that Jason is extensively versed and referenced and comes up with finely detailed information when trying to justify his one-sided denial…Jason is obviously drawing deeply from the murder denial website Crosstown Torrents that is run by British murder denier Gordon Johnson…As to Sharon Lawrence, Jason once again turns up the cheap defamation with tit for tat complaints against her in order to undermine her credibility…However, to anyone who has deeply-researched knowledge of the subject, it is quite obvious that Jason is turning up the cheap stuff against Lawrence exactly because he’s aware she had damning witnessing…If any cares to notice I pointed out in my last post that Sharon had a serious witnessing of Monika lying about pouring wine on Jimi…Monika did that in order to make a quick excuse about wine she knew was used to murder Jimi…In fact Monika’s death within a year of that event was directly tied to it…Jason is avoiding the basic fact that people don’t moan or make up transparent lies in reaction to wine that doesn’t exist…Lawrence did not cash-in on Hendrix…Jason is lying and when shown otherwise just repeats the lie harder like the troll he is…The bottom line is Sharon Lawrence was a reporter who knew Hendrix and experienced very important witnessing with Monika and the wine…Jason, on the other hand, is just an annoying internet troll… Yet despite his obvious denial Jason comes on here and tries to place himself and his obvious denial trolling before Sharon…The bottom line to anyone with any sense is the harder Jason goes after a witness with cheap defamation the more credible the evidence he’s trying to hide…

        I video interviewed Bob Levine 5 months before he died…I did it mostly because of liars like Jason who were misleading the public on what Bob really thought and had created a false understanding in that public …I was close to Bob and Tappy in the last years of their lives and knew them personally…That interview is on You-Tube and can be searched under “Bob Levine Caesar Glebbeek”…In it Bob makes clear that he has been misquoted by persons like Jason and that he suspected Jeffery in Jimi’s death…Levine’s first and last quotes are what are credible…Jason dishonestly ignores Bob’s first comments in the book ‘Setting The Record Straight’ where he warned Jimi not to sign a personal insurance policy with Jeffery and said Jeffery pretended he didn’t know about Jimi’s death a week after it happened…I asked Jason to please answer why Jeffery would pretend he didn’t know about Jimi’s death a week after it happened?…Jason ignored it…Hit piece writers like Joe Bosso and Bob Merlis were simply seeking the denials…Not wanting to get involved Bob gave it to them…Bosso and Merlis never covered any of the evidence for murder, which, as this thread shows, is more than abundant…After I spoke to Bob about the evidence he hadn’t ever been informed of he told me “I guess Jimi really was murdered”…

        Jason is lying when he says Gavin Thurston never mentioned the red wine in Jimi’s stomach…It is right there in Sharon Lawrence’s book where her fellow reporter Jack Meehan got it from Thurston during a September 29th 1970 interview…It’s the tie-breaker and decider as far as the evidence for the wine and vindicates Dr Bannister…Jason also ignores the fact we have caught Dr Siefert lying…In a video interview from the 1990’s Siefert said Jimi was covered in wine…After Tappy’s book came out Glebbeek got a quote from Siefert saying “I detected no alcohol on Jimi”…Siefert was obviously covering-up – which is more damning proof of the wine…The scum on Crosstown Torrents never admitted this overturned their denial position that Jason repeats here…They never apologized and never honestly admitted what it therefore showed…Jason is so full of dishonest denial that he can’t fathom that Thurston’s not mentioning the stomach full of red wine in the report is evidence of a cover-up…

        Seeing all this Jason then desperately resorts to the same old “you have no evidence” claim in front of a full case of evidence the public can see Jason’s weak denials have failed to answer for…It’s pretty pathetic and anyone can see Jason is a pathetic gadfly whose cheap denial is crushed and imprinted in the treads of the juggernaut of evidence we have shown…”Innuendo”???…Everything I have written here is based on solid fact that I have backed-up…Jason is so full of it that he actually thinks his cheap denials aren’t painfully visible for what they are and that he’s actually getting away with it…

        The autopsy and its forensics are not a “fraud source” as Jason lies…Jason is doing his best to use cheap trash talk to avoid intelligent discussion of the evidence for homicide that is locked-in to those forensics…

      • Buster writes an even loooooonger essay doubling down on defensiveness,lies, denial with character attacks.

        Buster is in free fall. Buster chooses to impugn my character instead of supporting his phony claims with real evidence. Buster only uses debunked one sourced quotes as evidence and tries to defend it when it’s proven false. That’s all tin foil hatters can do.

        Buster feels that calling me a “troll” will somehow make up for the fact he has no real evidence for his claims. Spent the last couple of weeks calling me not credible and not knowing anything. Now calls me well versed in Hendrix research. Which is it?

        I’m gonna have to refute this junk he wrote so here it goes.

        Buster and Flyswatter don’t post the correct evidence. They dabble in peddling fake conspiracy theories that they fabricate. All of what they post which is one sourced quotes and stories from fraud sources that can easily be fact checked and refuted with research.

        Buster continues to attack Kathy’s credibility cuz she refutes their phony conspiracy. Buster attacks me and calls me a “friend of murderers” when Hendrix wasn’t even murdered. Just more stupid character attacks cuz that’s all he has.

        What can I say Buster, you use people who are liars and frauds for your sources. Why are you defending them? Why do you defend garbage claims for your so called facts?

        Sharon Lawrence made up fake quotes in her book. She lied under oath in a court of law on foreign soil committing perjury, she auctioned off empty cigarette packs claiming it was Jimi’s from the 60’s/70’s. She is a liar and a fraud cashing in on his name. But you lie Buster and claim it isn’t so. Very pathetic, man. How can you believe a fraud who’s lied many times and use as a credible source? You are not the “greatest foremost authority” repeating lies from known frauds. This is fraudulent research based on lies.

        No Buster, you are lying. Dr. Gavin Thurston never said anything about “Hendrix being imbibed with large amounts of wine”. Sharon Lawrence printed a second hand quote where she claims Thurston said that to another reporter. Another made up fake quote from her and you use it as your phony claim as “real evidence”. if Hendrix was “imbibed with wine” Thurston would have made an announcement to every reporter who asked the cause of death and included it in his final report. Another b.s. one sourced quote with no evidence.

        Bob Levine never confirmed Jimi was murdered in any video. More lies fabrication coming from Buster.

        Siefert said that there was a “bit of mess” on Hendrix and never said he was covered in wine.

        Buster is ignorant of the word forensic. Forensics are samples taken from a death scene that determines evidence based on investigation and science. Bannister’s claim of lungs with wine is not forensics.

        The rest of what Buster wrote is paranoid defensive free fall. I ask Buster to prove all this evidence of a murder without his one sourced quotes. Can you do that Buster? Where is all this wine that Banister saw? What did he do with it?

        Buster’s 3 fraud sources for his phony murder claim

        Tappy Wright – deceased former Animals roadie who wrote a fraud book. Claimed Michael Jeffery admitted he murdered Hendrix with pills and wine. Wright later admitted he lied about this to sell a book. Jeffery was in Spain confirmed by two sources.

        Doctor Bannnister – fraud doctor who lost his medical license due to malpractice. Made up the phony claim he saw Hendrix’s lungs filled with wine so he couldn’t be sued again for malpractice.

        Sharon Lawrence – former UPI reporter who lied under oath perjuring herself in a court of law. Auctioned off old empty cigarette packs she claimed was Hendrix’s so she could cash in on his name. Wrote a book filled with made up quotes and stories including Dr. Thurston telling another reporter that “Hendrix was imbibed with wine”.

      • Hey Jason — hear this sound? PSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

        That’s the sound of you pissing on your own head and telling yourself it is raining (must be a form of cheap thrills, huh), because that is all your doing, as evidenced by this statement:

        “Buster and Flyswatter don’t post the correct evidence. They dabble in peddling fake conspiracy theories that they fabricate. All of what they post which is one sourced quotes and stories from fraud sources that can easily be fact checked and refuted with research. ”

        That is a blatant lie. The only person fabricating the lies is you. I posted a photo that showed what Jack Meehan told Sharon Lawrence about his interview with Thurston & all you’ve been able to come up with is a stupid one-line dismissal of “Dr. Gavin Thurston never said anything about “Hendrix being imbibed with large amounts of wine””, which is pure BS, because you can’t make up what Sharon published in her book. If Thurston hadn’t told that to Meehan, then he would have never relayed that info to Sharon & she would have never published it. Simple as that. It was the very reason that Sharon asked Monika directly in a phone conversation (shortly before Monika) if Monika had poured wine on Jimi.

        You say that what we post are “one-sourced quotes and stories from fraud sources that can easily be fact checked and refuted with research”, and yet, you haven’t provided one such reference source to those so-called “fact checks” (Kathy’s quote doesn’t refute anything and it certainly doesn’t refute Albert Allen’s witnessing, which I’ve shown that witnessing by Albert Allen was also referenced by Buzzy Linhart and Roger Pomphrey — which lays to waste your ‘one-source quote’ BS).

        I suppose that according to you, Juma Sultan is also lying about what he said about Jimi telling him that he was dissatisfied with the management that I made reference to earlier (which I noticed you never answered ) because it doesn’t fit your phony narrative. The Aleem Twins speak of the same thing in their book “Ghetto Fighters in Harlem World”.

        All you’ve done is just piss on your own head & tell yourself it’s raining and talk out your anal sphincter. Even one source is better than the NO sources that you’ve provided.

        We have the 3rd doctor named Bob Brown who also made a public statement that Jimi appeared to have “too much to drink” upon his arrival to the hospital which can seen in both of these articles:

        https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/music/about-that-jimi-hendrix-death-business/news-story/ce5ff67c5e0c9a0857b51eb33d88357b

        https://www.couriermail.com.au/entertainment/music/about-that-jimi-hendrix-death-business/news-story/ce5ff67c5e0c9a0857b51eb33d88357b?sv=55d2698fd5dee338cff30dfcede38062

        ^^Is that also a one source quote, Jason?. Looks like two sources to anyone else. What would make Bob Brown think Jimi had too much to drink, if there was no wine, as you are trying to depict?

        I suppose that next Jason will be telling us that the ambulance men didn’t find just Jimi’s dead body at Monika’s flat & that Monika was nowhere to be seen, even though that was entered into a sworn deposition, but according Jason, it’s just a one-source quote. Tell us Jason, does the pic below look like a one-source quote? Looks like a photocopy of the document proving that sworn deposition by those ambulance men, to anyone else.

      • All one has to do to realize Jason is a troll is to read Flyswatter’s and my own posts and then read Jason’s responses…Jason is lying below and he has not debunked any of our claims…Anyone can read this debate and see we offer substance and direct examples of evidence and references…Jason offers cheap trash-talk and crude denial in response…His form alone gives him away…As does the fact he offers esoteric detail from deeply sourced Hendrix material when seeking his falsely spun denials, yet when it comes to accounting for his false claims he suddenly becomes stupid and responds with cheap talk…The sure sign of a disingenuous troll…But the best way to expose these deniers is they always pose themselves as rejecters of bad claims and evidence…Well the worst evidence out there is Monika Dannemann’s official story that was used to determine the cause of death…Jason is hoping you won’t notice that he is ignoring that Kathy proved Monika’s story was nothing but lies…Jason poses himself as a harsh critic of bad evidence but he never touches Monika’s full offering of lies…

        I know Kathy and have discussed the evidence with her directly…When I told her the evidence for Jeffery’s guilt she said “Well, now you know”…Jason conspicuously avoids answering that the best way to approach this is to get Kathy to come out and talk about it and discuss it in a normal court room adversarial setting like is normally done…Once done you would see that she knows a lot more than she is saying and that Jason’s quote is wholly disingenuous and out of context…Jason also outs himself as a disingenuous troll by ignoring the fact Kathy was a main source for the murder evidence…Jason is hoping we don’t notice that he omitted that in his response and when I mentioned it he ignored it…Jason doesn’t like me saying he is uncredible, but when you ignore things like Kathy being a main source for the murder evidence you become uncredible out here where the substance lay…

        Jason’s coverage of Sharon Lawrence is visibly idiotic…As with Kathy the best solution would be to get Sharon to come discuss Jack Meehan’s witnessing and corroborate it…I’m sure if we could do that we would quickly see Sharon could cite references, articles, and confirming details that would leave no doubt Meehan witnessed Dr Thurston saying Jimi had a stomach full of red wine…It is also common sense that Monika would not moan for 20 seconds in reaction to innocuous wine that was only used to wash vomit…Common sense tells us no one would use wine to wash vomit when warm water and a hand towel were just as close by…I’m sure if we could somehow get Jason to confront Sharon in person and accuse her of lying she would rip him a new one and we would quickly see who was telling the truth…Sharon is telling the truth about her quoting of Meehan and she is also telling the truth about her discussion of the wine with Monika…It is the cheap rate internet troll Jason who is lying here…Somewhere out there is a record of Meehan’s interview with Thurston that will prove all this and show Jason to by the lying jackass he is…

        What Jason fails to honestly reflect is Dr Thurston’s witnessing of the wine is reinforced by the fact Dr Siefert was caught lying…In the 1990’s video documentary maker David Kramer captured Siefert saying Jimi was covered in wine on tape…After Tappy’s book came out Glebbeek quoted Siefert saying “I detected no alcohol on Jimi”…Siefert was obviously lying to cover-up something he knew was dangerous…Also, Dr Bob Brown was quoted as saying he walked in next to the gurney when Jimi was wheeled in to hospital…Brown said there was obviously some kind of misadventure involving wine and that Jimi was obviously beyond medical remedy…Jason is pretending his itemized denial is working but anyone can see these other witnessing corroborate Lawrence and Meehan…Jason never answered why Scotland Yard failed to go find the nurses that witnessed the wine when they pretended to answer Kathy’s petition…A denial troll must always keep the arguments within the dishonest confines of his disingenuous narrative…

        To show how flagrantly dishonest Jason is, instead of honestly admitting my interview with Bob Levine showed that everything he said about Bob was wrong and that Bob actually did suspect Jeffery in Jimi’s death, Jason created a strawman saying “Levine never confirmed Jim was murdered”…This is just straight dishonest use of sleazy semantics to get around the fact Bob sided with me and agreed Jeffery was suspicious in Jimi’s death…There’s no doubt from my interview with Bob that Jason got caught lying and trying to misrepresent what Bob really believed…And he won’t own up to it when caught like the true denial troll he is…And we are still waiting for Jason to answer why Jeffery pretended not to know Jimi was dead a week after he died…Or why Bosso or Merlis never asked Bob about that?…(That’s still unanswered by yourself Jason)…

        Jason shows fatuous ignorance in his saying that I don’t understand forensics…Only a fool would say wine in the lungs is not forensic evidence like Jason does…He dismisses himself from credibility on that one count alone…I spoke to Harvard’s top pathologist and he told me I had a remarkable ability to converse on a medical basis for a lay person…I also spoke to several of the world’s top forensic pathologists…What Jason is really saying here is he doesn’t understand my forensic evidence…It proves Jimi did not have enough alcohol, barbiturate, or time to die the way that was claimed…If Jason would actually discuss that instead of dodging it like he did he would see that I am correct…

        Jimi was an epic victim of some of the world’s worst evil corruption…Lying and distorting evidence like Jason does, in order to defend the murderers and deny Jimi justice, is probably one of the lowest things you can do…In a perverse way Jason probably doesn’t realize he is only proving the extraordinary evil measures that were used against Jimi in the first place…Jason’s contrived slander and negative spin against Tappy, Sharon, and Dr Bannister is the desperate attempt to misrepresent that it looks like in order to deny the obvious…His libelous dishonesty against those 3 is easily refuted by a more honest and lengthily detailed account of their true involvement that Jason is obviously trying to short-cut with his vicious spin…There’s a hot place in hell waiting for Jason…

      • And let us not forget the 4th person that Jason has slandered in TaHarqa Aleem & how Jason talks a real tough guy talk of how he’d “gladly say that TaHarqa Aleem is a fraud and con artist right to his face. Same guy who made up a fake story for a book”

        Yeah right — and result would most likely be two hits. TaHarqa hitting Jason & Jason hitting the floor

      • Flyswatter, you should change your name to Fabricator cuz that’s all you do. You and Buster lie. You both peddle phony conspiracy theories and get angry when the facts prove you wrong.

        You are lying. You’ve posted no photo of the phony Sharon Lawrence “Jack Meehan claim”. You posted a letter from the ambulance service that stated Hendrix was alone in the flat when the ambulance men arrived. Why are you lying?

        Sharon Lawrence made up several fake quotes and stories in her book. That is a fact. She couldn’t even correctly state where Hendrix was born. The wine myth was already circulating when she wrote her book. Sharon Lawrence made up that quote about Meehan in the book for dramatic effects for the reader. Thurston made no reference to “imbibed wine” in his final autopsy report. He certainly wouldn’t say “imbibed wine” to a lone reporter and then “forget” to add it in a crucial autopsy report. Sharon’s quote was made up.

        Yes, you use once sourced quotes using fraud sources. I’ve already fact checked your phony Tappy Wright claim. Tappy Wright claimed that Jeffery murdered Hendrix with wine and pills. That is a false lie. Jeffery was in Spain confirmed by Trixie Sullivan and Bob Levine. You were fact checked by me and proven to be a liar. Anybody who reads your garbage can fact check what you write and refute your phony claims.

        Jimi being dissatisfied with his management has nothing to do with what you are trying to claim. Bob Brown is another one sourced quote. Bob Brown never worked on Hendrix. Bob Brown made his quote after Bannister claimed his imaginary wine. Neither Bannister or Brown stated anything about wine in 1970. They both said nothing about wine in their statement they released to the press in 1970 as a cause of death. There was never any physical evidence of wine inside Hendrix. No wine was preserved for evidence and no wine was ever documented in any medical, death or autopsy report in September 1970. All we have are phony claims from decades later with no physical proof that you’re trying to sell.

        Your reading comprehension is terrible. Take a reading comprehension course and brush up on your Hendrix history.

      • Buster writes another looooong useless essay only attacking my character, lying, and defensively repeating his same phony debunked theory. Hilarious.

        Buster is in rapid free fall. He should use a pair of feathers and flap his arms to prepare for a soft landing.

        I’ve asked Buster to provide some real evidence for his phony murder theory and the response he gave me was “go to hell”.

        That should tell us all we need to know about Buster “the self proclaimed foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix”. Buster has no evidence to provide and that’s why he’s angrily lashing out in his comments. If he had evidence he would post it instead of rambling on about nothing important.

        Buster has no evidence to support his phony murder theory. That’s why he spent his whole useless post attacking my character calling me a “troll”. He weakly and defensively repeated the same garbage that’s already been debunked with his flowery prose. Buster can only use fake quotes from fraud sources cuz he has nothing else to offer. That’s why his Hendrix murder theory is a total joke.

        I’m gonna have to refute all this junk he wrote again. Read on.

        Buster rants about Monika Dannemann when I’ve never mentioned the woman. He also tries to pass off “private conversations” he claims to have had as his “big evidence” to prove his theory. Another joke that should give everyone reading a big laugh.

        Buster has been busted using fake quotes and fraud sources for his “evidence”. Sharon Lawrence peppered her book with fake quotes and Buster uses the phony Meehan quote as his source.

        According to Sharon Lawrence, Dr. Thurston (a famous coroner who routinely spoke with reporters) only confirmed “imbibed wine” to Jack Meehan and no other person on Earth. Anyone with a half a brain wouldn’t believe that crap. That is a total joke. Thurston never confirmed anything about “imbibed wine” in his final autopsy report. There was no “imbibed wine”. Lawrence made the whole thing up for her fantasy book.

        Buster claims Sharon Lawrence would “rip me a new one” if I confronted her on her book claims. That’s kind of hard for her to do when she claimed Jimi was born at a family friend’s house instead of King County Hospital where he was actually born. Buster is providing pure comedy in his post for everyone to read.

        Buster is delusional believing he sees things in a video that doesn’t exist. Only the things he wants to see. That is delusion. Bob Levine never said anything in that video about Jimi Hendrix being murdered. Anybody watching will tell you that.

        Buster shamefully hounded this sick man living out his last remaining days in his nursing home. Buster was trying his hardest to lead Bob with questions and answers looking for the confirmation he never got. Levine never confirmed Jeffery murdered Hendrix. That’s hilarious. Bob knew it didn’t happen. That’s why Bob never confirmed it in Buster’s pointless video.

        What we did see was an ill looking Levine becoming visibly upset at Buster’s persistent questioning. Levine looked like he was about to cry and said “he didn’t want to discuss it” and it was “old stuff”. A horrible thing to do to a very sick man.

        When Levine was in better health and in sound mind he vehemently denied Hendrix being murdered on record in the press. Bob also proclaimed Jeffery being innocent. Levine told that to various media outlets. I’ll take the healthy Bob at his word which is documented as evidence stating Jimi was never murdered. Buster’s video was an epic fail.

        Buster the “self proclaimed foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix” doesn’t even know his Hendrix history if he thinks Jeffery “pretended not to know Jimi was dead for a week”. If Buster was credible he would know that there was a huge storm that went through Majorca Spain on the early morning of September 18, 1970 that knocked out the power and phone lines. No power to watch t.v. or to accept phone calls. This has already been documented. Buster should take a Hendrix 101 History class.

        Buster has no understanding of the word forensic. Buster thinks a phony claim of “wine in the lungs” from Dr. Bannister as he matches up the blood alcohol numbers on Thurston’s autopsy report accounts for his forensics. Everybody should be rolling on the floor with laughter. And his claim of undisclosed “world’s top pathologists” calling his understanding of forensics “remarkable” makes it even more hilarious.

        Forensics is the actual physical evidence and there is none. There never was any wine accounted for in the lungs of Jimi Hendrix. It wasn’t seen in the performed autopsy or listed in the final autopsy report. Bannister never reported any wine in Hendrix on September 18, 1970. Dr. Siefert said there was “a good bit of mess” not “he was covered in wine”. That’s why this whole thing is joke.

        Buster has no clue of what the word slander means. He thinks when his fraud sources are exposed for their lies that is slander. Nope. That is called telling the truth.

        Tappy Wright claimed Jeffery killed Hendrix with wine and pills. That is false. Jeffery was in Spain. Wright admitted he lied to sell copies of his book. No slander since that is the truth.

        Doctor Bannister lost his medical license for fraud and was sued for medical malpractice. He made a phony wine claim in 1992 when he thought he was going to be sued again for malpractice. He said nothing about wine in 1970 when he prepared the official written hospital statement on Hendrix’s death. No slander that is the truth.

        Sharon Lawrence committed felony perjury in a court of law in Toronto in 1969. She auctioned off empty cigarette packs claiming they belonged to Hendrix in the 60’s to make money off his name. She made up fake quotes in her book and lied where Hendrix was born. No slander this is the truth.

        TaHarqa Aleem made up a phony story for his book. He claimed that Jimi Hendrix gave him 2 prized guitars in 1969. He sued Janie Hendrix so he could steal Jimi’s guitars and auction them off to the highest bidders. No slander here either.

        Buster calls it slander cuz he is angry that his 4 fraud sources has been exposed as liars and he can’t use their fake quotes as phony evidence. All of that is the truth. This is why we can’t believe these 4 frauds since it’s their fraudulent claims for a Hendrix murder with no evidence.

        I thought Buster would have more than this. He humiliated himself with his pathetic post.

  106. I appreciate any efforts made to establish the truth of what happened the morning Jimi died. There have been countless books and documentaries about Jimi’s life and death. A very thorough and well written book was written by Chris Welsh in the early seventies. Also the Warner Bros documentary featured many interviews with the people who new Jimi intimately. The Aleem twins were featured in this. They had every opportunity to discuss Jimi’s death in that interview back then, but they decided to wait 50 years later to write about the conversation between Monika Danneman and Michael Jeffrey. Buster you say that Bob Levine encouraged you to speak to the FBI about the information you have about Jimi’s death. Did you? Also did you contact Kathy Etchingham when her investigation was going on with your information? People like Tappy Wright who disclose “bombshell” information many many years later are the ones who are not helping Jimi.

  107. Please don’t patronize me Ivana…I have Welch’s book…It is the first Hendrix book I ever bought…Typical of British authors it is worthless on Jimi’s murder and avoids any useful analysis…Because of that Welch was chosen to speak of Jimi’s death at the end of the 2013 documentary ‘Hear My Train A Comin’…Welch said Jimi died of a barbiturate overdose and ignored all the evidence Kathy Etchingham revealed…Yet you describe it as “very thorough”…

    You once again show the ignorance I accused you of when you suggest that the 1973 “Soundtrack” movie would have delved in to the circumstances of Jimi’s death…Warner Brothers was mob-connected and was the institution Michael Jeffery had a contract for Jimi’s music with…It is quite ignorant to the point of foolish to not realize Warner wasn’t going to spoil future profits by uncovering a murder that would have resulted in that relationship ending abruptly…I had a personal conversation with Albert Allen and asked him why he didn’t say anything back then…I hope to release it in a future book…By the way, they didn’t wait 50 years and I have interviewed musicians who witnessed Albert speaking of it in the 70’s…Michael Jeffery was alive and was involved in contracting that movie when it was made…

    If you ask me to take my evidence to the FBI you are only exposing your ignorance once again…FBI and COINTELPRO were accomplices if not the direct sponsors of Jimi’s murder…You ask a lot of questions, but you don’t ask why CIA, FBI, or even Scotland Yard didn’t look in to the murder of a US citizen overseas…

    I really wish I had contacted Kathy Etchingham back when she made her petition…I believe I could have added serious clout to her attempt…My Hendrix collector peer group were not intellectual types and I did not know of or subscribe to the Hendrix magazines of the day…In any case what I am typing here makes no difference whether it was entered back then or now…

    Ivana, you practice the permanent aggressive posturing of a person seeking to deny…What you have done here is paved a road of your own gratuitous doubt and then driven down it by answering your own questions but never answering mine…If you look at my last post I showed you court room level evidence that proves Jimi was murdered…You made no attempt to answer it…Instead you made very weak, specious points that were easily responded to and did not constitute any overturning or refutation of what I wrote…You can’t just ignore that Kathy proved Monika had lied about the time of death by as much as 6 hours…Dr Rufus Crompton said Jimi died no later than 5:30am because of the undigested rice in his stomach…This was also the time Eric Burdon admitted Monika first called…If you read what I wrote you can’t die from 9 Vesparax if you have a famous tolerance like Jimi…And you especially can’t die if you only had the pills inside you for only 1 or 2 hours…Gleebeek found that persons who took 10 to 15 pills never died in less than 4 hours…And none of those victims were found with 5 bottles of wine flooding their lungs and stomach with only a trace blood alcohol content…

    Jimi fired Jeffery at 5pm on the 17th and was found dead 12 hours later under dubious circumstances with everyone lying…Jeffery would have done jail time once his books were inspected because of the millions he stole…

    Please answer these provable facts Ivana…So far you haven’t…

  108. The reason I brought up Chris Welsh’s book is that it was written very close to Jimi’s death. He was therefore able to interview most of the people who had a relationship with Jimi. This book holds more credibility with me than books written many years later except for Tony Brown’s and Kathy Etchingham’s books. As I have said before I get my information from books regarding Jimi’s death. I have chosen to believe that Jimi was not murdered unlike yourself Buster. Unless you are Monika Danneman reincarnated then your information is also secondhand. The reason I stated you should go to the FBI is that you need to be accountable for the information you put out there because you are the one making these accusations about various people. You also seem to be casting your net wider and wider to include the Mafia. This has nothing to do with the Aleem twins appearing in the Warner Bros documentary and their subsequent book. For me your story is becoming less and less believable with every post. The people you knock just because they hold different views from your own makes me wonder whether you have an agenda. At the time of Kathy’s investigation, Gerry Stickells said people who remember what happened many years ago were making things up. I wonder whether he had a point? 🎓

    • Not murdered, you say? You gotta be kidding me !! Answer this question directly, Ivana — how the hell can any casualty have their stomach and lungs flooded with wine and a blood alcohol content of .005% (like Jimi did, as well as a blood reading of .7mg of quinalbarbitone) in any accidental death or suicide scenario. That is both physically and medically impossible in either of those two scenarios. There is only one scenario where such a thing a thing is possible — HOMICIDE. To not answer this directly, Ivana, is to instantly forfeit credibility regarding discussion, which I see you’ve done already.

      Regarding Albert Allen, what he witnessed took place at Electric Lady studios in the U.S. Jimi’s death occurred in the UK — meaning there were no authorities that Albert Allen could turn to to tell what he had witnessed (everything regarding Jimi’s death was outside U.S. jurisdiction). It’s apparent that you didn’t read the article on this page very well, for if you did, you would have figured it out that this is who Roger Pomphrey was referring to (the Aleem Twins & this was back in 1997) about what he was told off-camera (try looking up).

      • You have my view on this issue. That is all I need to say and will be saying. I do not need to justify my opinion as I am not making accusations of murder.

      • Ivana — your opinion doesn’t count. It’s the facts and verified information regarding this case — which you’ve been shown in abundance, but failed to answer directly — that have the final say & what really count and render your opinion completely VOID. What I posted was not opinion, but based on fact, alone.

        All you are doing is talking words without being able to back them. Sorry, but Scott Thompson was right about “talking out of your anal sphincter”.

      • Ivana — this is exactly what Buster and I have been giving to you — THE TRUTH. When I stated to you ” stomach and lungs flooded with wine and a blood alcohol content of .005% (like Jimi did, as well as a blood reading of .7mg of quinalbarbitone) ” cannot happen in any other scenario than homicide — you were being given the truth!! Time for you to put any opinion to the side and get on-board with it.

        You had said that Buster had gotten his information second-hand, same as you. This is FALSE. Look up, and you will see that Buster stated that he had spoken directly to Dr. Bannister directly <— THAT, my dear, is NOT second-hand. That is first-hand from a prime witness that was there & spent nearly a half-hour suctioning red wine mixed with gastric contents from Jimi's lungs & stomach on Sept. 18, 1970.

        By the way, for anyone thinking that Dr. Bannister was the first person to tell somebody from the press or media about red wine being found in Jimi — WRONG !! The first person to do that was the coroner Gavin Thurston when he told UPI representative Jack Meehan, on Sept. 29, 1970, that regarding Jimi's stomach contents, the autopsy revealed that "a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed". This info is in Sharon Lawrence's book "The Intimate Story of a Betrayed Musical Legend" & you can't make this up. Does anybody want to see a snapshot of that excerpt from that book regarding what Meehan told Sharon regarding his interview of Thurston just one day after the Inquest? Well, here it is:

      • FLYSWATTER says: Not murdered you say? You gotta be kidding me!! how the hell can any casualty have their stomach and lungs flooded with wine and a blood alcohol content of .005% (like Jimi did, as well as a blood reading of .7mg of quinalbarbitone) in any accidental death or suicide scenario. That is both physically and medically impossible in either of those two scenarios. There is only one scenario where such a thing a thing is possible — HOMICIDE.

        What’s physically and medically impossible is your bogus wine hoax. Hendrix never had his lungs and stomach “flooded with wine”. There is no St. Mary Abbot Hospital report or autopsy report stating there was “stomach and lungs flooded with wine”.This is all make believe fantasy.

        FLYSWATTER says: Regarding Albert Allen, what he witnessed took place at Electric Lady studios in the U.S. Jimi’s death occurred in the UK — meaning there were no authorities that Albert Allen could turn to to tell what he had witnessed (everything regarding Jimi’s death was outside U.S. jurisdiction).

        No one to turn to eh? Nice fake cover story for Allen’s fake story. I guess you’re ignorant how international laws work. If Hendrix was murdered (which he wasn’t) in the UK then the killers would be brought to the US to face charges. Also, there is the media. If a murder story came out, the UK would have to charge people to avoid a national scandal of a murdered rock superstar. Your fake cover story along with Allen’s fake story has proven to be just that….fake.

  109. Flyswatter, I appreciate any effort made to establish the truth of what happened that morning to Jimi. Anyone, family, friend or fan I think would understand this. I am a fan who is saddened by the loss of a great musician, and I believe we are all on board with this one.

    • Ivana — if you are sincere about appreciation of “any effort made to establish the truth of what happened that morning to Jimi”, then please get on-board with the truths that Buster and I have shown you.

      Don’t go the same route as the author of that “death of Jimi Hendrix” site. As Buster said, the author of that site is not credible, just looking for any excuses to deny that Jimi was murdered, and he’s been called out elsewhere & counter-attacked and slaughtered, which you can see for yourself in the link below, but a word of warning — this site isn’t for the timid or feint of heart and separates the men from the boys:

      http://www.toughreality.net/hendrix/nine.html

    • Ivana – You’re just ignoring what I’m saying and once again referring to your own useless dialogue…Your input does have one good aspect though…It shows a good example of denial psychology and how people avoid the facts that prove Jimi was murdered…

      I don’t understand why you keep referring to Chris Welch…Welch is not a good source because he never touches the murder topic or any of the evidence like many British sources…I suppose with your denial intent you prefer authors who don’t mention the murder subject…

      Your assertion above that I am some kind of Alex Jones who needs to be brought in to legal accountability for the accusations he makes is really ballsy considering all the facts and evidence you have contemptuously ignored here…Your saying my evidence is second hand is just your way of dishonestly avoiding what I quoted from Monika and how it was proven by the facts and evidence you ignored…Your responses here are not credible…They represent disingenuous regressions from what I posted and a deliberate attempt to avoid the FACTS I am showing…

      It is a statement of abject ignorance to say I should go to the FBI when all the facts in this case show FBI involvement in the cover-up…I don’t take your suggestion that I should go to FBI seriously…You are only saying that because I mentioned Bob Levine’s saying I should go to FBI…The only reason Bob said that was because he realized my proof was good…Frankly when you say it I take it as the trolling point it is…Anyone who had a credible understanding of this subject would know that Jeffery being Military Intelligence would pre-empt any honest investigation by FBI…You show ignorance of the COINTELPRO era that disqualifies you from credibility on this issue…

      No Ivana, your input shows an unqualified, wishy washy logic that exposes a lack of serious research on the subject that you are gratuitously denying…What I said about Warner Brothers, their mob connections, and their still being under contract to a living Jeffery, are all true and your dumbed-down level of response and reasoning did not credibly answer it…You failed to honestly answer that with Jeffery and Warner’s being in control of the 1973 ‘Soundtrack’ movie there was not going to be any talk about murder in that film…Your entries not only show serious ignorance but also show an intention of not honestly acknowledging correct explanations of what you cite…Frankly your answers are idiotic and show a brazen contempt for honest discussion…What you are failing to honestly address here is the specious points you previously made to justify your denial were all bogus and easily overturned…Instead of honestly answering that you have veered further off in to the ridiculous in order to evade those points…You’re just doubling-down on opinionating in order to evade clearly spelled-out facts and evidence both myself and Flyswatter have detailed…

      If you were seriously interested in the evidence you pretend to call for you would not have ignored the 5 hour delay and how it affects the forensic evidence that I discussed…If those forensic arguments are over your head and comprehension ability that is not my fault…All you are showing people is you can’t acknowledge or answer a sound forensic legal argument when shown…It is you who is guilty of what you accuse me of and it is YOU who won’t allow someone to prove it with a sound argument of evidence…If you respond please answer my forensic argument that is based on the 5 hour delay…Otherwise don’t waste our time…

  110. The link ‘The Death Of Jimi Hendrix’ was written by a British ex-patriot living in France named Jim Hawthorne…He goes by the internet handle “Purple Jim” on Hendrix websites…The man is simply a Caesar Glebbeek acolyte and is simply not credible…He is responsible for a lot of damage to the correct understanding of the truth on this matter, as Ivana shows…After offering a tendentious, blatantly one-sided spinning of the information from the main sources he then reaches the summations below at the end of his webpage article:

    ” An accident?
    At Danneman’s flat Jimi took some sleeping pills and perhaps some more (administered by Danneman?). He lay down exhausted, then in Danneman’s absence (or as she slept) eventually vomitted in his sleep. Dannemann then found Jimi either in a coma or, unknown to her, already dead. She made little effort to assist the dying Jimi and simply panicked, and according to Burdon was worried about the drugs that were lying around the flat and that Jimi would have been furious about the media repercussions of his hospitalisation. She dithered around in a panic until she finally called the ambulance. ”

    Notice Jim doesn’t bother to include any time frame for any of this…Further back in the article Hawthorne writes that Eric Burdon may have been called as early as 10:30am…That right there shows Hawthorne is not making any attempt to honestly relate the correct information…Hawthorne has read my posts where I quoted Eric admitting Monika called at dawn but prefers to mis-lead people like Ivana by not mentioning it…If Hawthorne bothered to present an accurate time frame he would have mentioned that the evidence shows Jimi took the pills from 3:30 to 4:30am and died no later than 5:30am…If he bothered to read the manufacturer’s product information and overdose case histories that were publicly presented by Glebbeek he would realize Jimi could not have vomited and died from the pills within the true timeline…Another thing Hawthorne bungles through is the true timeline shows Monika never went to sleep…

    The next glaring bungle Hawthorne commits is he quotes two proven liars, Burdon and Dannemann, in their saying they delayed calling the ambulance because they were worried about drugs being found by the police…Only a fool doesn’t see that was a bullshit excuse thought-up by those doing the cover-up in order to explain the 5 hour delay…Hawthorne repeats it without question and then uses it to determine his conclusion…Hawthorne is aware there is much more to it than what he lists but he deliberately keeps it free of detail in order to deceive gullible readers like Ivana…Hawthorne is an evidence scofflaw who is deliberately avoiding mentioning how the true timeline and its missing 5 hour gap disproves everything he is saying…And Ivana accuses me of unfairly knocking him…In the meantime Hawthorne fails to inform the readers that there were other Hendrix managers there early on that shows those decisions were not made alone by Monika…

    Hawthorne continues:

    ” One must also take into account that Jimi’s girlfriend Carmen Borrero recounted (source unknown) that on several occasions she found Jimi sleeping and choking! She said that she had to assist him and clear his windpipe when he started chocking in his sleep. Apparently Jimi’s mid 60s girlfriend Fayne Pridgeon has also mentioned similar incidents. This is an important revelation and it could mean that Jimi in fact suffered from sleep apnea. So the incident with Monika, may well have been aggravated by this condition. ”

    The source for that was newspaper journalist Charles Cross…Cross also wrote the weird book ‘Room Full Of Mirrors’ where he never mentioned Etchingham’s investigation…I believe Cross is a disinformationist who was only seeking information that would make it look like Jimi overdosed himself…And low and behold that was the conclusion he came to in his book where he covered Jimi’s death in only one page and said he died of a barbiturate overdose…

    What Cross didn’t cover, when he managed to get those out of context quotes from Carmen, is that Jimi survived all those other events…In fact those other events are a good analogy for why there is something wrong with Monika’s story…What Cross never asked is why Monika never did the same since the situations were identical?…All we get from Monika is a creepy story where she claims she washed vomit off of Jimi’s face with wine (Even though the ambulance men said there was vomit all over Jimi’s face)…Apparently Monika not being there when the ambulance men showed up doesn’t merit any further questioning by Hawthorne or Cross on why that analogy doesn’t work…Nor do Cross or Hawthorne mention that 2 weeks earlier Jimi had been witnessed taking a “hand full” of barbiturates and then washing it down with a pint of whiskey in Denmark…He never even passed-out in that case where he actually did have a significant blood alcohol content…

    Finally, Hawthorne is seeking excuses around the fact that we have proven Jimi had 5 bottles of wine inside him on the morning he died with only a trace blood alcohol content…Something he did not have in those other events that Cross and Hawthorne use for comparison…

    No serious Hendrix researcher uses Jim Hawthorne’s ‘The Death Of Jimi Hendrix’ article as a source or takes its flagrant evidence-avoidance seriously…Hawthorne is aware of information that disproves what he wrote but doesn’t correct it…When he saw our ‘Tough Reality’ website he went to the Crosstown Torrents website and posted that it was “pretty tight” and “impressive”…He then never entered a single word in reaction to it or admitted how it completely debunked his credulous article…

  111. Buster you are reading too much into what I am saying. Fans need to hear every side to the story so we can form our own opinions about what happened to Jimi. The reason I mentioned Chris Welsh is that he was able to interview Chas Chandler, Noel Redding, Gerry Stickells, Eric Barrett, Michael Jeffrey, and Jeanette Jacobs all of whom had a close relationship to Jimi shortly after Jimi died. He also had access to the major rock stars of the day including Jimi. That is why his book has more relevance than the others written decades later except for Tony Brown. I also mentioned you should go to the relevant authorities with your considerable evidence so that Jimi’s death can be treated as a cold case rather than just another conspiracy theory. Please do not treat other authors research or my posts with contempt in order to heighten your credibility. Your work needs to stand on its own two feet.

  112. My work is standing on its own in its forcing you to back down from your previous statements…Yes, fans needing to hear all the facts is exactly why I started posting on this as soon as I learned about it…So your citation of sources that either deliberately avoid or misconstrue the true facts probably doesn’t help…

    What you say about Chris Welch isn’t correct…The proper way to look at Welch is to determine how much he probed in to the subject when he had a chance…It is one thing to have close access to Hendrix people, it is another to put it to good use…You’ll find the closer people are to either rock journalism or the Hendrix management community the less likely they were to risk the personal consequences of looking in to the issue…Once Welch was chosen as the spokesperson who backed the official story by saying Jimi died of a barbiturate overdose in the Hendrix Company 2013 documentary, and never once mentioned his murder, you can dismiss him as a source…Michael was still alive when Welch researched his book…Welch, like many other Hendrix authors, was writing for himself and his career…He wasn’t writing for Jimi…There’s a lot of epic cowardice in this and many people who were close to Hendrix are not risking their skin…

    Ivana – I can tell from your posts that you have very little researched knowledge of this case…In any case, I think you have that backwards and it is you and Purple Jim who have treated what can only be called sound proof for Jimi’s murder with contempt by ignoring it and coming in on the side of the wrong conclusion…You can’t tell the tiger how to hunt you and if you enter insulting denial of the evidence that Jimi was murdered then you’ll have to take what follows in the real world where people do real defenses…

    You don’t seem to understand the full circumstances of this in regard to the authorities…The authorities were already gone to by Kathy Etchingham…Kathy showed them more than enough to re-investigate the case…Instead they lied, avoided seeking critical witnesses, and stonewalled Kathy…You don’t seem to register that the authorities are a suspect in this case and are intentionally preventing any honest investigation because if that honest investigation were truly done it would inevitably lead right back to those same authorities and show serious signs that they were directly involved at the time…There’s serious questions on all levels, including Jeffery’s Military Intelligence membership and the strong possibility it was protected in the non-investigation…There are also serious questions about the British government assisting its main ally’s Central Intelligence Agency and FBI in eliminating what they considered a serious subversive who they placed on their “Security Index”…These people were out to kill the 60’s and decapitating one of its most charismatic leaders succeeded in doing that very effectively… Once Jimi was on the Security Index then that means they were monitoring him, and once they were monitoring him they had to know about his troubles with Jeffery…I would imagine they would be monitoring his phone calls and knew he called Steingarten to fire Jeffery 12 hours before he died…No Ivana, this is no playing field for beginner level opinions and anyone well familiar with those agencies would know they were more likely to be stoking the problems between Jeffery and Jimi rather than investigating them…To suggest those authorities are not already well aware of all this is foolish and naively unaware of the world at minimum, if not uninformed of the already established record…

    Yes, Jimi fans and anyone else interested in how governments operate need to know the facts…There’s a reason your source Purple Jim has no discussion section on his website and never comes out in public to answer for his deliberately deceptive article…Please show me Chris Welch talking about this anywhere…

  113. Sorry Buster your post is sounding more and more like a conspiracy theory and has therefore lost its appeal for me. I have decided not to post anymore opinions since all I have are opinions since I never knew Jimi personally. All the best and goodbye.

  114. The fact that Monika devoted her life to painting her pictures of Jimi and turning her home into a Hendrix shrine tells me that this woman had nothing to do with murdering Jimi. Also her outburst at Harvey’s apartment meant that she truly believed she was Jimi’s fiancé. I have watched the David Henderson interview and he uses the words “I think” and “I don’t know” quite a bit in conversation. He also states that Devon Wilson was not a groupie, and he writes in his book that Noel and Mitch never saw Jimi as their equal something they both found very offensive. Michael Jeffrey was in Spain when Jimi passed away, and Tappy Wright admitted his phoney story of Jimi being murdered. The number of times Buster mentions what people told him off camera makes me question his credibility and something we cannot verify. Buster and Flyswatter have set themselves up as the beacons of the truth and anyone who challenges this is misguided and delusional. The people he knocks the most are the people who knew Jimi personally. Buster befriended Bob Levine, an old man confined to a nursing home, five years before his death, in order to coax out of him a now defunct myth. But Buster keeps at it and he seems to find newer ways to further his claims.

  115. Ivana — I’m going to tell you quite truthfully, that you come across like a chicken running around after having its head cut off (same as your brother, Jason). Let’s break down what you just posted above & it will clearly illustrate that. We’ll start with this:

    “The fact that Monika devoted her life to painting her pictures of Jimi and turning her home into a Hendrix shrine tells me that this woman had nothing to do with murdering Jimi. Also her outburst at Harvey’s apartment meant that she truly believed she was Jimi’s fiancé. I have watched the David Henderson interview and he uses the words “I think” and “I don’t know” quite a bit in conversation. He also states that Devon Wilson was not a groupie, and he writes in his book that Noel and Mitch never saw Jimi as their equal something they both found very offensive”

    Very interesting how you strain at a gnat where David Henderson is concerned & swallow a camel where Monika Dannemann is concerned. Try looking up at the photocopy of the sworn deposition by the London Ambulance Service. If Monika had nothing to with Jimi’s death, then why wasn’t she at the Samarkand flat when the ambulancemen arrived? Why did she lie about that event so profusely? And why did she, shortly after Jimi died, travel all the way from Europe to Electric Lady Studios in the US, to show Mike Jeffery her Samarkand photos — two of which Albert Allen saw that clearly showed Jimi’s dead body on her bed? Regarding David Henderson, he quotes that London Ambulance Service deposition exactly word for word in his book, exactly like you see in the pic above.

    Next we have this:

    “Michael Jeffrey was in Spain when Jimi passed away, and Tappy Wright admitted his phoney story of Jimi being murdered.”

    You have no way of knowing for certain of Jeffery’s whereabouts at the exact time Jimi died (which, according to Dr. Crompton could not have been later than 5:30AM, due to the undigested grains of rice found in). Spain is just a 2 hour plane ride from England. There was 5 hour delay in calling the ambulance — plenty of time for any perpetrator to escape. Jeffery may have been in Spain when the news got there that Jimi died, but that was many hours later in the day. Jeffery’s exact locale at the exact time Jimi died cannot be verified by anybody in Spain.

    As for Tappy, you’re just regurgitating the same thing that Scott Thompson called you out on, but once again, providing no source of this. Every interview that I’ve heard with Tappy, (and this is over a 10-year span) he says the exact opposite. BTW, I’ve never bought Tappy’s book, because I only need to listen to this audio clip of what Monika tells Caeser Gleebeek in a 1975 radio interview (provided in the link below) about the Mafia being behind Jimi’s death to easily distinguish how what Monika says lines up with Tappy’s claim.

    [audio src="http://www.toughreality.net/hendrix/images/monika.ogg" /]

    And next we have this:

    “The number of times Buster mentions what people told him off camera makes me question his credibility and something we cannot verify.”

    Just because you can’t verify it, doesn’t make it untrue. Who have you spoken to directly that is connected to this case or knew Jimi personally? Yeah, that’s just what I thought — NOBODY !!!

    And we continue with this:

    “Buster and Flyswatter have set themselves up as the beacons of the truth and anyone who challenges this is misguided and delusional.”

    TRANSLATED: You can’t answer directly the questions that Buster and I have asked you directly, and can’t answer or refute any of the germane points that we’ve made. You say that Buster and I have “set themselves up as the beacons of the truth” — well, do tell us — what exactly have you and your brother Jason set yourselves up as with your continued evasive blather? That’s right — a pair of chickens running around with their heads cut off, in addition to exposing yourselves as lovers & makers of lies that have no interest in the truth regarding this case (which is evidenced by the two of you employing the little girlish copout of ‘can’t attack the message, so attack the messenger’ regarding any testimony given by anybody that refutes your phony narrative).

    And then we also have:

    “The people he knocks the most are the people who knew Jimi personally.”

    Excuse me, but Monika Dannemann deserves every knock against her, as Tony Brown showed in his book “Hendrix — The Final Days” and proved that Monika was lying regarding what happened on the morning Jimi died. As for Kathy, it was simply said that she didn’t know of Albert Allen’s witnessing when she made that comment regarding Jeffery and that she doesn’t go any further than Monika when she’s asked about what happened with Jimi. Not a knock on her — just a factual statement. Show us where Buster or I have knocked people like Noel Redding, Mitch Mitchell, Billy Cox, Buddy Miles, Juma Sultan, or the Aleem Twins, since you are mentioning people that knew Jimi personally. Try looking up & you will see that it is Jason doing that regarding the Aleem Twins.

    And then there is this:

    “Buster befriended Bob Levine, an old man confined to a nursing home, five years before his death, in order to coax out of him a now defunct myth. But Buster keeps at it and he seems to find newer ways to further his claims.”

    At least we have the proof that Buster did indeed speak directly to Bob Levine. What have you provided to substantiate anything that you’ve said? NOTHING !!

    Oh, and let us not overlook this from Aug. 5th:

    ” I have decided not to post anymore opinions since all I have are opinions since I never knew Jimi personally”

    And yet, here you are nine days later doing exactly that. Unable to make up our mind, are we? Try looking up, and you’ll see that Buster & I have been here quite some time & we aren’t going anywhere

  116. Isn’t the whole premise of this the supposed murder of Jimi Hendrix by Michael Jeffrey and Monika Danneman? What exactly was it that Buster got out of Bob Levine a few maybes and it’s possible? I do not purport to know the truth as you do. I have opinions from the books I read. MJ was in Spain and Wright admitted he made the whole thing up. The lies have been exposed so what is this all for? We know that Monika was across the street with Terry Slater awaiting the ambulance and that Jimi was lying on the bed fully clothed covered in vomit. She then tried to cover her tracks by suggesting that the ambulance officers and/or doctors acted in an unprofessional manner as implied by Tony Brown. It’s common knowledge the ambulance was called five hours later as revealed by Dee Mitchell, Kathy and Michael Fairchild. Monika then turned her house into Hendrix shrine with her paintings as revealed by Kathy. Noel Redding wrote in his book that Monika’s life centred around Jimi after he died. He also states that the delay in calling the ambulance may have resulted in Jimi’s death. Monika later married Uli Jon Roth but apparently it did not last because Jimi was Monika’s true love according to her. These are the facts Flyswatter. Where does Buster get his supposed truths? Who are his sources? Please don’t say Bob Levine, the FBI or the Aleem twins.

    • Ivana: Is that the best you can get out of what we’ve shown?…Don’t you have any sense of criminal detection what so ever?…Albert Allen’s witnessing is real…I know because I spoke to him in person and the record of his witnessing shows he told it to people as far back as the 1970’s…We know it is real because Albert mentioned the famous Samarkand photos of Jimi that Monika took before anyone knew about them…Albert witnessed Monika plotting against Jimi with Michael…He heard her saying that certain photos she was showing to Jeffery could be used to make the case that Jimi was visibly destroying himself with drugs so badly that you could see it in his appearance…In other words those photos could be used to cover-up the real cause of death they both knew of…This evidence puts everything else in perspective and, unless you have no mind at all, makes anyone who looks at this realize Monika’s true position in all this and explains her whole presence regarding Jimi…Stickells’ flat being two blocks away then becomes obvious as the close-by Jeffery outpost that arranged the nearby Samarkand death trap that it is…Monika’s being swung in to Jimi’s presence in that last week then takes on clear new meaning…There’s no way Scotland Yard would ignore all this if it were honestly investigating so what right do you have to ignore it?…You’re ignoring the most damning evidence and trying to use the weakest examples of those who spin against the murder evidence by distorting quotes…How dare you, considering what we’ve already shown…

      You’re not asking the necessary questions of why Scotland Yard never went and interviewed Tappy Wright or tried to find out more?…The man made a serious claim…You would think they would be interested?…Or why they showed no interest in Monika saying on the air in 1975 “Jimi was murdered for sure”?…You would think that might spark some curiosity in them?…Or why they never sought-out and interviewed the nurses about the wine?…Or why the Inquest itself never called any of the emergency personnel or doctors to the witness stand?…You’re highly doubtful and critical of us but you are very forgiving of what can only be called guilty avoidance of normal investigative practices in the formal inquiry…

      I take exception over being portrayed as a person who bothers old people in nursing homes…That’s a vicious slander…I first encountered Bob Levine in 2011…I went to his house in 2012 and a couple of times after…Bob was sent to the nursing home in 2014 mostly because of his legal blindness from a previous stroke…He died in July 2016…I visited him several times in that nursing home and realized I was the only person who did…Bob was touched by that and told me “I consider you like a son”…In 2016 I realized no one had recorded Bob’s true thoughts on how he was being used by biased journalists like Bosso and Glebbeek, so I called him and told him I needed a favor…Bob agreed and said no problem I’ll do a video…I then went and got what Bob told me in many phone conversations recorded on video…Someone needed to set the record straight on Glebbeek’s dishonest use of Bob in his 2011 ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication…In any case it is terribly dishonest to ignore that Bob was clearly pointing fingers of suspicion towards Jeffery in McDermott’s ‘Setting The Record Straight’ (1992)…Bob said that he could not find Jeffery for a week after Jimi died and was trying to contact him in Spain…When he finally contacted Jeffery he pretended to not know Jimi had died even though there were many witnesses, like Jim Marron, who saw Jeffery being informed the day it happened…Jeffery was acting like a guilty man and there is no doubt that is what Bob was hinting at when he was first interviewed about the subject in 1990…

      I did not coax anything out of Bob as ‘Setting The Record Straight’ clearly shows…I realized that I had been the first person to inform Bob of serious evidence that he needed to know and he quickly agreed because he sensed that it rang true according to his personal experiences as Jimi’s manager and a close associate of Michael Jeffery…Anyone who ignores this true context is being willfully dishonest and should not be taken seriously…They’ve had their turn at this and have done great damage to Jimi Hendrix and his true history…

  117. Expressing opinions is a good thing, and I’m all in favor of it. Even better is the expression of educated, informed opinion, and citation of sources that can be verified is even better. When informed opinion is expressed with cited sources and incontrovertible facts can be established this builds a firm foundation for further research. On the other hand, purposely and willfully uninformed and misinforming opinions never serve the interests of the public, and they are usually as welcome in a discussion as the intestinal vapor their …fortitutde…discharges.

    Certain voices on this thread are willfully ignorant and attempting to bludgeon the voices of the more informed by trying to shout them down with the same moronic refrains.

    It is a fact, not an opinion, that Michael Jeffery worked for the British Secret Service.
    In their book, HENDRIX: SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT (1992), John McDermott and Eddie Kramer (the latter of whom worked for Michael Jeffery) write the following: [pp. 48-50]

    “If Jeffery had developed anything during his brief career in the entertainment industry, it was an acute skill for manipulating people to serve his wishes. A brilliant negotiator, he was not a blustering, physically overpowering figure. He was charming, well educated, slight and soft-spoken. Beneath his effete veneer, though, was a supremely cunning and inventive mind. Like Chandler, he too had grown up in the North. Jeffery was an ex-MI5 member with combat experience, serving in Britain’s Suez operation during 1957-58. While in Egypt, Jeffery displayed the first glimmer of his notorious business acumen.

    At the beginning of his military career, “ recalls John Hillman [Yameta director and one of Jeffery’s personal attorneys], “Jeffery was a ranking nothing [he would later rise to the rank of captain]; he was, however, a shrewd businessman in the making. While serving in Egypt, Jeffery discovered that newspapers were like gold to the soldiers. Everyone was craving for news about home. English newspapers, three days old, were selling for two dollars apiece. Jeffery decided that the sensible thing would be to find a source for the newspapers and go into business. He found out that in Cairo there was a news agent who sold papers from abroad that were only two days old. It was against regulations for British soldiers to venture into Cairo without permission. Regardless, Jeffery hired of of his squaddies to drive him to the news agent evry week with a truck. They collected the newspapers, and Jeffery began selling them to the British army in Suez at two dollars each. The practice was highly illegal, but Jeffery was earning wads of money….

    Jeffery was, as a well, a student of Machiavellian tactics, and employed such techniques as divide and conquer. As Chas Chandler recalls: “Jeffery used to use anything he could to keep people off balance. You didn’t realize how much you had been manipulated until you were out of his circle. Suddenly it was like you woke up. Because he couldn’t get close to Jimi, he would drive a wall between myself and Jimi.”

    I invent everyone to turn to page 358 of McDermott’s book, where they will find the extensive index reference pages on Michael Jeffery, co-authored by one of his former employees and mainly written by the primary publicist for the Experience Hendrix foundation, which does, in fact, have a certain of amount of status and credibility, don’t you think?

  118. Scott, you’re quite correct in this assessment:

    “Certain voices on this thread are willfully ignorant and attempting to bludgeon the voices of the more informed by trying to shout them down with the same moronic refrains.”

    Both of these two individuals (Ivana and Jason) are following the Nazi Germany protocol of “accuse the other side of that which you are guilty of”. I’m quite certain that Joseph Goebbels (the chief Nazi propaganda minister) would have been happy to recruit both of them during the Nazi Germany regime.

  119. Regarding the “Machiavellian” dimension of Michael Jeffery mentioned by McDermott and the Questionable Reliability of Statements by Trixie Sullivan

    “Jeffery himself was growing disillusioned with Yameta. When he became short of funds an associate would be sent down to Nassau to the Bank of Nova Scotia, to surreptitiously withdraw cash and smuggle it back to New York. Leon Dicker, Yameta’s American representative fondly recalls Trixie Sullivan, Jeffery’s secretary, returning from such a mission, unbuttoning her shirt in his office and subtracting bundles of cash from her bra. “Michael always knew how to beat the system.”” (McDermott: 126)

    *******
    With this introductory remark regarding both her overall integrity and the extent of her loyalty to Michael Jeffery, let’s now revisit Trixie Sullivan’s remarks made on the BAND OF GYPSYS documentary.

    I refer to the infamous Madison Square Garden concert plug-puller when Jimi Hendrix was simply too incoherent to perform. It has been alleged that Jimi had been dosed by Jeffery with LSD or another psychedelic.

    “Buddy Miles claims that Michael Jeffery, in a deliberate effort to sabotage the Band of Gypsys’ performance, slipped Hendrix LSD backstage. ‘Both my sister and I saw Jeffery slip Hendrix two tabs of acid, and I personally saw Hendrix take them. He looked so scared.” (McDermott, 1992: 250).

    McDermott immediately follows this with the statement that “No other member of Hendrix’s management team present at the concert accepts the sabotage story.”
    (McDermott: Ibid.).

    A few paragraph before this we learn that “At some point amid the crush of activity backstage, Hendrix became too stoned to perform—either unknowingly or by design.” Bob Levine is then cited: “He was out of it so badly.” Gerry Stickells is cited, recalling that Hendrix did not want to go on stage. “I had to convince him to perform.” (McDermott: Ibid.)

    Great job, Gerry!

    If Gerry Stickells had to convince Jimi to perform when Jimi himself knew that he should not do so and would do a bad job, why then would Stickells ever publicly aknowledge that his own boss had undermined the show.

    Returning to the documentary.

    04:23—04:30 Trixie Sullivan: “The relationship with Mike Jeffery, as manager to Jimi, was very simple: Mike took care of all the business side of things, he got money when we could, he did the money side of it, and he left Jimi TOTALLY, TOTALLY in charge of the artistic side of it.”

    At approximately 43 minutes into the film, Jim Marron somewhat uncomfortably mentions that the Allen Brothers “were working on him” [Jimi] to get him more involved in the Black Nationalist movement.

    43:44: A. Allen: “He [Jimi] began to lean toward some of those elements…like The Panthers…the so-called ‘street people’…that association was necessary for him…”

    To which Gerry Stickells responds with:

    44:17 Gerry Stickells: “When we went out, Jimi never thought of himself as black…(then falters, smiles embarrassedly, tries awkwardly to rephrase)….”

    51:10 A, Allen: Now the issues that he was discussing. The war, the pain…this is a whole separate thing besides the music, so when you put it together you have “Machine Gun”…

    This segues into a brief discussion of Miles Davis, Jimi Hendrix and jazz

    60:33 “ Jim Marron [in response to Jimi possibly working with Miles on jazz material]…Michael Jeffery hated the idea because it’s not a lucrative field…If you wanna make money in the record business, you better stick to rock n roll.”

    76:15 Buddy Miles: “The Band of Gypsys was a strong personal statement by three brothers…”

    Madison Square Garden Affair

    77:23 Jim Marron: “That was a pitiful concert. I was given ringside seats for my family and myself, and when I saw the state Jimi entered the stage on … a half hour late…maybe an hour…I wanted to crawl under the seat I was in and deny any association with him…

    [Only by reading McDermott, p. 251 do we know precisely what embarrassed Marron]

    77:43: Billy Cox: “Jimi was staggering. Somebody’d given him something….Buddy was really pissed off…”

    77:56: Buddy Miles: “How would you feel? (Suppressing tears) I was very hurt for him, and – excuse me – I, just, ah, I really hated to see it. “

    88:16 Jim Marron: “It was a shame. It was an embarrassment. It was probably a low point of Hendrix’s career….”

    88:26 Trixie Sullivan: “I think it wasn’t working. The two new members of the group. And I think [ she looks up and to the side] they had to finish….Look, you can look for a million reasons, and you can say it was this and it was that, but it’s because it really wasn’t working.”

    89:02 Buddy Miles: I thought it was unfair. … ‘cause of the fact that … the management did not want the three brothers playing together. Three blacks.

    89:25 Gerry Stickells: I really don’t think that is a fair assessment .. to say that Mike Jeffery or whoever was involved didn’t want an entirely black band. That’s not fair.

    89:34: Trixie Sullivan: If you’re talking specifically about Buddy Miles being in the group, and Mike sacking him, it would have been TOTALLY on Jimi’s instigation. Under no circumstances would Mike Jeffery come in and sack people without Jimi’s permission, approval, and [she looks up and, nodding to herself in confirmation] in fact his instigation.”

    And yet, John McDermott w/ Eddie Kramer have written something quite different:

    “Backstage, Jeffery reiterated his demand that the Band of Gypsys were to be disbanded following the performance. His desire to fire Miles, says Gene McFadden, was delivered with such relish that it infuriated Hendrix.” (McDermott, 1992: 250)

    This account entirely contradicts Trixie Sullivan’s statement that Jeffery did not involve himself in the artistic aspects of the group. Jim Marron’s statements regarding Jeffery’s fear that Jimi would go more into jazz also contradicts Ms. Sullivan.

    Having been told by McDermott that she smuggled money for Jeffery, having seen her words entirely contradicted by McDermott, Buddy Miles, and Jim Marron, why should any informed viewer necessarily take any one of her statements on film on face value? Why should she be considered believable in any way, shape or form?

  120. Conflicting information. The ambulance was called after five hours and the ambulance officers said that Jimi was clearly dead. When Jimi arrived at the hospital I read he went straight down to the morgue. Another doctor said he worked on Jimi the implication being that Jimi was alive when admitted. Otherwise why would he try and resuscitate someone who had been dead for hours. Dr. Bannister said that Jimi was an usually tall man and he said he did not know who Jimi Hendrix was. This beckons the question was this Jimi Hendrix or did he have him mixed up with another patient? No mention of red wine in the coroners report or at the inquest. The red wine story surfaces many years later. Jeffrey is accused of murdering Jimi byTappy Wright who then confesses he made the whole thing up. Trixie Sullivan and Jim Marron both said MJ was in Spain, and now Trixie is being made to look like someone who would cover up a murder in order to look like a devoted employee. The Aleem twins look very happy and relaxed in both their interviews again no mention of the supposed conversation between Monika and MJ this just happens to coincide with the release of their book. How opportunistic! Monika then devotes her life to painting portraits of Jimi and turning her home into a shrine. She then states that she was engaged to Jimi in order to enhance her status giving many interviews and appearing in magazines and documentaries.Odd behaviour for a supposed murderer. Bob Levine said in his interview with Buster that maybe, it’s possible that MJ murdered Jimi but then in another interview dismisses this completely as a total fabrication. So where does this leave Buster, Scott and Flyswatter in a galaxy far far away in black hole. NO REPLY NECESSARY. THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE BUT NOWHERE TO SEEN IN MOST OF THESE POSTS. Goodbye.

    • No, it doesn’t leave Scott, Buster, and I, in any galaxy far away in a black hole. Your post simply illustrates that you don’t use your head for anything other than a suppository, as evidenced by your statement “THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE BUT NOWHERE TO SEEN IN MOST OF THESE POSTS”. That it totally false. The fact is there is very little useful input or information in YOUR posts. Just the same regurgitated bunk over and over.

    • Oh, and “NO REPLY NECESSARY”, huh? Says who? You going to get it, regardless. I’ll start with this bit:

      “Dr. Bannister said that Jimi was an usually tall man and he said he did not know who Jimi Hendrix was. This beckons the question was this Jimi Hendrix or did he have him mixed up with another patient?”

      That line of BS can easily be refuted with pictorial proof. In 1993 Dr. Bannister made the public statement that Jimi was wearing “jumper or towel that was saturated in red wine”. What is it that we see Jimi wearing in the pic below that was taken less than 24 hours before Dr. Bannister attended to Jimi? Sure looks very much like that very “jumper or towel” that Dr. Bannister spoke of to anybody that has a properly functioning pair of eyeballs.

      • What gullible and uninformed Ivana doesn’t know is the posted photo of Jimi was taken in the afternoon of the 17th at the Samarkand garden behind the townhouse…That large scarf around Jimi’s neck is Monika’s…The doctor whom Ivana and Jason call a shameless fraud, Dr Bannister, said in his description of trying to save Jimi that he had a towel or jumper (“Jumper” is an English word for light blouse) around his neck that was soaked in red wine…For many years the sources Ivana is so innocently quoting tried to say Dr Bannister mistook a taller patient for Jimi and got confused, however this Samarkand photo taken by Monika cinches the deal and shows the scarf Dr Bannister referred to when describing the patient he removed 5 bottles of wine from…Monika did not release this photo until her book was published in 1995…Someone did show that she released some of the photos but the place they were seen was a rock publication Dr Bannister did not have access to and did not read since he had no interest in that kind of music…Nor did he have access to any of the Samarkand garden images over in Australia…This proves the man Dr Bannister treated was Jimi because Dr Bannister had no way of knowing about that scarf unless he had seen it in person on the individual he treated that morning…Ivana and Jason are being silly because it is a matter of hospital record that Dr Bannister and Dr Siefert were on duty on the 18th…These deniers allow themselves any kind of absurdity and make Dr Bannister an idiot who doesn’t remember what happened or who he treated…However the above is undeniable proof and establishes beyond a doubt that the person who was soaked in wine whom Dr Bannister removed 5 bottles of wine from was Jimi Hendrix, as proven in exhibit A above…Those websites Ivana instantly trusts got awfully quiet awfully quick when we produced this…The photo is one of those Monika was showing Michael Jeffery when Albert Allen suddenly surprised them…That is also proof of the veracity of Albert’s witnessing because he too had no way of knowing of those secret Samarkand photos Monika hadn’t released to the public…I have yet to see truth-seeking Ivana give an honest answer to this other than throwing a bunch of denier garbage up against it and hoping it will stick…Ivana also ignores that there were witnesses to Albert telling that story as far back as the 1970’s…

        The red wine story did not surface many years later…It came out on the 29th of September 1970 when reporter Jack Meehan got Chief Coroner Gavin Thurston to speak about it…Ivana has failed to answer that this is proof that Thurston had knowledge of the wine and therefore failed in his duty to process it against the trace blood alcohol content…This is proof of malfeasance by the investigating authorities because it was Thurston’s duty as Chief Coroner to apply what that told him to the cause of death determination and he failed to do so…Any sound-minded investigator would then realize the lack of any calling of the ambulance men or doctors to the Inquest was not a mistake and that Thurston and the Inquest were stood down by covert intervention…The Thurston witnessing is proof of a wrinkle in the investigation that indicates official corruption…Thurston had to learn of that wine from somebody so it was either Dr Siefert as the head registrar or Dr Teare as the main autopsist…If it was Teare then we also have evidence of malfeasance because Teare did not record that wine in his autopsy report…And if you have good detective skills you’ll notice that Teare later adjusted the barbiturate blood level upward in a supplementary autopsy procedure…Dr Teare also made an estimation of the blood alcohol level at the time of ingestion of the Vesparax…These are illegal measures that go against autopsy law that were obviously designed to bolster the claimed overdose and drug/alcohol conflict official cause of death…Anyone with any common sense who looks at the bigger picture we have exposed will see Dr Teare’s illegal adjustments and estimations were due to his realization that the forensics didn’t add up…He realized there wasn’t enough barbiturate and proceeded to adjust it upwards…He also realized there wasn’t enough alcohol and proceeded to make an illegal adjustment upward that was based on Monika’s false timeline…Estimations are not allowed in autopsies…Just on this information alone the Hendrix family has a serious lawsuit against the Crown…If people don’t see how Jeffery’s Military Intelligence status works in to all this then they are fools…

      • Buster’s “Grand Conspiracy” reaches new levels. Is everybody reading this? Buster is now accusing London’s top pathologist Dr. Teare of illegally adjusting autopsy numbers so Buster can still claim his phony wine murder myth. LOL

        Buster is also claiming that Dr. Teare, Monika Dannemann, and Mike Jeffery were all in on the plot together. According to Buster, Dr. Teare illegally fixed the autopsy numbers at Jeffery’s demands to coincide with Monika’s testimony. Jeffery never had any military intelligence.

        This stuff is pure comedy. Even a Hollywood script wouldn’t be this bad. I guess when you have no evidence of wine to prove, you gotta make it up.

      • Jimi Hendrix was famous for wearing a jumper so Buster’s and Flyswatter’s attempt at using Monika’s last photos of Hendrix for Bannister’s wine recollection is pathetic. Bannister could easily view a Hendrix album cover or photo in a book and say he had a jumper. He thought Hendrix was an “unusually tall man” who “was naked” that day. How is he going to remember a jumper from 1970?

        Bannister wrote the official hospital statement on Hendrix’s death in 1970. He specifically stated “due to a barbiturate overdose”. Bannister never wrote anything about “5 bottles of wine in his lungs” as the cause of death. Why didn’t Bannister state wine as the official cause of death on 9/18/70 if he claimed in 1992 he had lungs full of wine?

        The Aleem claim is phony as well but Buster continues to parrot it as fact. A total joke.

        Jack Meehan was never told that “Hendrix was imbibed with wine” by Thurston. That was another made up quote by Sharon Lawrence for her phony book. Out of all the people in the world Dr. Gavin Thurston only told Jack Meehan about “imbibed wine” when every reporter under the sun asked Thurston about Hendrix? Give me a freaking break. Lawrence lied and you keep using her fake quote as “evidence”.

        Buster hilariously tries to create his own fake story for the absence of wine. This conspiracy story he tells is hilarious and most of all pathetic. Buster accuses Dr. Teare of illegally adjusting the alcohol numbers for the Hendrix autopsy at Michael Jeffery’s request. Can you believe that? Buster makes up his own fake stories for evidence. LOL.

        Dr. Teare did not illegally adjust numbers at Jeffery’s request. Jeffery was never in British Intelligence. The highest rank he had in the Army was private. Dr. Thurston wrote the final autopsy report. You are making up fake stories Buster.

        Buster has no evidence for the absence of wine so he makes up a fake story in his head for “his evidence” so he can appear to look correct. Pathetic.

      • Nice try at recreating events that never happened trying to change history. Jimi wasn’t wearing these clothes when he died. Jimi took a bath where he wrote his final poem and changed his clothes before going out again. So you failed with your attempt to give phony credit to Bannister. You tin foil hatters will stoop to anything to promote your fake and phony claims.

  121. It is quite clear that Justin Ames has lost integrity – despite all those great photos- by allowing this provocateur named Ivana to slander individuals who post material cited by people like John McDermott and the Experience Hendrix corporation and who actually quote source material. I never once said Trixie Sullivan had anything to do with the death of James Marshall Hendrix. I said that her statements on film about the Madison Square Garden concert are less than credible seen against other evidence.

    There is still another version of the Madison Square Garden event worth mentioning. In his ‘Scuse Me While I Kiss the Sky, David Henderson gives a somewhat different version of the events.

    Buddy Miles is quoted: “I personally witnessed Michael Jeffery give him [Jimi] two tabs of Purple Haze, acid, before we went on the stage at Madison Square Garden. Jimi, from the very start, was not himself. After that eighteen minutes, Jimi humped over, like he was gonna throw up. And then when he got up something scared him. He went off the stage. Michael Jeffery had a smile on his face. And I said, “Michael, you did what you set out to do, didn’t you?’ No comment.” (Henderson, 2008: 347).

    Just when it looks especially damning, however, Henderson adds the following:

    “But author Sharon Lawrence said Jimi told her it was Devon who gave him the bad acid. Whatever it was, it effectively severed his public connection to the anti-Viet Nam War movement.” (Ibid.)

    Whether it was Michael Jeffery or Devon Wilson who undermined the Madison Square Garden concert (McDermott entertains the idea that it was a mix of LSD and alcohol), Henderson himself reiterates the allegations made by Buddy Miles regarding Jeffery’s overall disdain for the Band of Gypsys:

    “Even before Woodstock in August of 1969, Jeffery had been dead set against Hendrix appearing with black sidemen, especially when all of them were black. He had made sure they were far to the back of the stage at Woodstock. He did not like the wild-haired African-named Juma, nor the addition of his congas to Hendrix’s sound. Jeffery marshaled a powerful argument against Hendrix going any further in the direction he had been going: Jimi had the lawsuit settlement to pay off and he had the Electric Lady Studios to pay for. They had little money coming in. Jimi could not take the chance of alienating people, and in Jeffery’s mind, Jimi had already alienated his fans quite a bit in the past year.” (Henderson: 348).

    It remains entirely unclear how Jimi Hendrix wound up so out of it at the Madison Square Garden concert. McDermott doubts that Jeffery would have dosed Jimi. “It is highly improbable that his motive was to embarrass his meal ticket before a sold-out audience.” (McDermott, 1992: 250).
    That said, McDermott does not fail to add the detail about the closing moment of that concert:

    “As he would ‘Earth Blues’ down to an unscheduyled early close, Hendrix stepped to the microphone and vented a thinly veiled gibe at Michael Jeffery: ‘That’s what happens when earth f—s with space, never forget that.”

    What does appear to be clear, however, is that Trixie Sullivan is incorrect in her statement that Michael Jeffery did not concern himself in the artistic aspects of Jimi’s music. On the contrary, he reminded Hendrix of his financial obligations in precisely a manner that forced Jimi to toe a specific line regarding the style of the music played, the particular people in the band, and their appearance … down to their complexion.

    These are clearly aesthetic demands on the part of management, and no doubt Jimi Hendrix began to regard them as progressively more and more ham-fisted.

    • You presume to lecture me about integrity? Scott, you’re completely out of line… I’ve let this debate over Jimi’s death flow for years and have never censored any part of it. And I certainly don’t intend to start deleting anyone’s comments now either! That’s not how we play around here.

      I have always appreciated Buster (and others) for posting carefully researched, thought-provoking content here as a resource for anyone that has questions about the official narrative of what happened to Jimi.

      Do you think Buster has never been attacked for what he has posted? He doesn’t ask me to delete anyone’s comments though. Instead, he provides detailed rebuttals, which advance the discussion. THAT is how civilized people reach conclusions. To arrive at a truth often requires sifting through confusing, conflicting information that is, all too often, filled with intentional misdirection. Therefore, we are compelled to throw the entire disgusting, churning mass of truth, lies and fantasy onto the operating room table to be dissected and discussed by all… Opinions and statements should be able to stand on their own and should be able to withstand alternative arguments, trolling and even lies.

      I don’t know anything about Ivana except that she has never asked me to block you. So, I’d say that right now she’s got more integrity than you.

      I condemn your call for silencing a voice you don’t like, Scott. Individuals that are so eager to strip others of their voice disgust me. And you know what, if you do it again, I’m going to block YOU for calling on someone else’s voice to be silenced. It’ll be an opportunity for you to contemplate how much you like the experience.

      • Justin,

        This is a well written article. Glad you gave people an opportunity to discuss Jimi’s death. Thanks for having the integrity not to silence people’s voices with censorship. Everybody should be able to present their thoughts and viewpoints without being silenced. This should be an outlet for everybody to give their viewpoint on their position. Censorship is for the weak individuals who don’t want other viewpoints being heard. Thanks for allowing people to express their viewpoint in a public setting. Freedom of speech should not be silenced. Thanks Justin.

        It’s very clear that people like Scott Thompson, flyswatter, Buster don’t like to be challenged with an opposite viewpoint. They become angry and defensive calling for censorship, calling me a nazi, calling me a troll. That’s weak and pathetic. Obviously they have no confidence in their own position cuz they stoop that low to silence you and attack your character. Perhaps they should develop a better argument instead of trying to silence the ones who have a better one.

    • I’m just a bystander, reqding this incredibile discussion about Jimi. This may well be the most epic thread ever in the long run on this subject anywhere on the internet. Why spoil it by turning iinto a flame war Scott ? Buster doesn’t go down that route. I can persoanly vouch for Justin, been corresponding with him on and off for years. Show a bit of respect for the man, Scott. He’s well travelled and learned!

      • I hope we can all go back to our neutral corners and let the bout resume…While I do not offer any criticism of Justin because he is our host and we owe our ability to conduct this conversation to him, I have to defend Scott…Scott is the on-air radio host of San Francisco’s KPOO…I did a show with him on Jimi’s death in the summer 2016…Let me just inject that Scott’s frustration comes from his scholarly approach and his expectation that these threads will lead to a progress of points that have to be respected…The history of this is I was insulted and banned from the 2 main Hendrix venues “Crosstown Torrents” and Facebook’s “Electric Guru” when I tried to post what I am posting here…So while Justin extends free speech to those who deny Jimi’s murder they do not return the favor and their justification of the gross censorship they applied to myself and my world-leading information was quite moronic…They were basically saying the Hendrix internet was only for air-headed fans who wanted fun and a serious subject of great importance to Jimi and his history wasn’t welcomed…They saw the subject as being more for mocking and ridicule than serious concern…This website is one of the few corners of the internet where it isn’t automatically banned…Those feel-good morons who celebrated my unceremonious booting do not show up here because they are not serious entities…They are however in control…May I express that that is where Scott is almost certainly coming from so I sympathize with his frustration while also extending to Justin my appreciation for this preciously-endangered space…The only other battleground was a “Skeptoid” article comments section that has since had its 10 years-worth of comments deleted in order to leave the utterly useless skepticism of the murder evidence the article offers the only remaining thing…Our comments, like the comments in this article, had shown the original Skeptoid article to be ridiculous and opposite to the real facts…If it wasn’t for us the prevailing doubt and credulous material Ivana offers would be the only unchallenged viewpoint…

        So in my defense of Scott, that is in no way meant to be a criticism of Justin and his generous hosting, Jason and Ivana’s content is condemningly disingenuous and in contempt of the reasonably-proven facts…It noticeably avoids recognizing or responding to the facts we’ve proven and asks us to take persons who are obviously deliberately avoiding the evidence as equal partners having an equal say…Both Jason and Ivana are obviously skimming the sites I was banned from for their worst murder denial material and presenting it straight without making any effort to respond to the evidentiary value of what we are showing or how it progresses an understanding of the events…

        What persons like myself, Scott, and Flyswatter are doing is making a case for murder and doing it on a court-room basis…That basis includes the expectation that a judge would look at all the input and consider its evidentiary value…Therefore when we show evidence that refutes and makes moot the previous denial arguments Jason and Ivana present we find it frustrating that they can contemptuously respond with material that has obviously been invalidated by what we have more than reasonably shown…It is extremely frustrating when you present brilliant evidence that advances the knowledge of the subject to a serious degree and then see a person whose game is obviously taunting denial allowed equal access…In a court of law those who offered such contemptuous dishonesty would be reprimanded by the judge and forced to obey the best facts…On the internet they are allowed to get away with it despite the pernicious intent of what they write…There’s a fine line between Devil’s advocate and crass denier…I think that line has been objectively crossed by certain participants and at some point those who offer the best material have a right to a certain amount of respect…As do persons like Dr Bannister and Albert Allen, both of whom I know personally and can assure anyone that they are telling the truth and I would bet my reputation on it…It is painful to me to see persons who I know are not credible and are not offering genuine input to slander both those gentlemen without recourse or being made to account for it…Not to mention the main suggestion from Jason and Ivana is that I am some kind of a nut who is lying, presenting fraudulent sources, and distorting the true record…Jimi Hendrix is a very serious thing to me that I approach with great reverence and respect…Because of that I am very careful how I conduct myself and how I possibly affect Hendrix and his history…My reverence for Jimi and his significance is why I am making this effort in the first place…Just this morning a radio show in the New York City area broadcast an interview I did on Jimi’s murder to a 3 million person audience…

        In summation, the way to look at Jason and Ivana is the ill-considered gratuitous doubt they offer is what spurred persons like Scott, Flyswatter, and myself to develop the evidence further and led to the tighter case we are showing here…So even though they are doing something extremely wrong and detrimental to Jimi it has led to the side-effect of further research and tightening of the case…So we’ll just have to rest in the assurance that the smarter credible readers will see Jason and Ivana are not credible entities and that their noticeable failure to credibly answer our good evidence is the indirect victory it is…They’ll know that our evidence has won the case and that the best effort of those in denial failed to show otherwise…No reasonable person could ever see those two as being seriously interested in the real evidence…

      • BUSTER says:Jason and Ivana’s content is condemningly disingenuous and in contempt of the reasonably-proven facts…It noticeably avoids recognizing or responding to the facts we’ve proven and asks us to take persons who are obviously deliberately avoiding the evidence as equal partners having an equal say.

        Sorry Buster, you haven’t proven any facts. The only thing you post are made up make believe stories coming from dubious sources who all have been proven to be liars. You dabble in conspiracy theories with not one solid piece of evidence have you ever provided when asked for it. All the facts I’ve posted refute your claims. I choose not to believe unconfirmed quotes, wild innuendos and scenarios, and your made up assumptions until you show real solid evidence.

        BUSTER says: Therefore when we show evidence that refutes and makes moot the previous denial arguments Jason and Ivana present we find it frustrating that they can contemptuously respond with material that has obviously been invalidated by what we have more than reasonably shown…It is extremely frustrating when you present brilliant evidence that advances the knowledge of the subject to a serious degree and then see a person whose game is obviously taunting denial allowed equal access.

        LOL. You haven’t posted any “brilliant evidence”. You posted a phony claim by Tappy Wright that has been debunked that you don’t even fully believe. You posted claims by Doctor Bannister of “massive gallons of wine” and he has no documented recorded evidence of it or proof it existed. He claim he “dumped it out”. No rational person is going to believe that garbage unless you have proof.

        BUSTER says: In a court of law those who offered such contemptuous dishonesty would be reprimanded by the judge and forced to obey the best facts.

        Yes, you would be scolded by a judge trying to use debunked claims from Tappy Wright and Doctor Bannister as your “evidence”.

        BUSTER says:Not to mention the main suggestion from Jason and Ivana is that I am some kind of a nut who is lying, presenting fraudulent sources, and distorting the true record.

        Well, post some actual proof of the evidence of wine and I will change my mind. Every source you posted turns out to be a liar and embellishes the truth. Tappy Wright, Bannister, and Lawrence all have lied and are frauds.

        BUSTER says: So even though they are doing something extremely wrong and detrimental to Jimi it has led to the side-effect of further research and tightening of the case…So we’ll just have to rest in the assurance that the smarter credible readers will see Jason and Ivana are not credible entities and that their noticeable failure to credibly answer our good evidence is the indirect victory it is…They’ll know that our evidence has won the case and that the best effort of those in denial failed to show otherwise…No reasonable person could ever see those two as being seriously interested in the real evidence

        There is nothing “wrong” with not believing a phony conspiracy theory, especially one when it has all been debunked from top to bottom. You have no evidence except quotes from unreliable sources. I’ve asked you to post solid evidence several times an you refuse. All you post are character attacks and the same debunked quotes and theories over and over. That is not my fault that you are unable to use real evidence to prove your case.

    • Yeah… well it just so happens when Justin was speaking of “conflicting information that is, all too often, filled with intentional misdirection”, he was speaking of YOU.

      And where Buster and I are concerned, you have been NO challenge, as evidenced by the whole slew of questions put to you directly that you haven’t been able to answer directly, in addition to the whole slew of germane points that you can’t answer directly or refute. That right there automatically puts you on the losing side of your so-called “challenge”.

  122. Yes, indeed, Justin, many thanks for that awesome burst of self-righteous dyspepsia. It arouses me to no end to be lectured by your savoir faire. And I loved the way you purposely misunderstood and twisted my words so that you could pat yourself on the back about what a generous guy you are to host such a nifty site. The problem is that you completely misrepresented what I said. I was not suggesting, nor will I ever suggest that any person on this thread ever be refused their right to post anything. Nor do I need your idiotic reiteration of what the site is about since I began posting on it ten years ago.

    Whatever actually happened to cause Jimi Hendrix to leave us before we were ready for him to go, the fact remains that the music is still entirely alive and kicking. And as my fingers dance across this keyboard, a lovely acoustic version of “Hear My Train a-Coming” is spinning in new 33 1/3-inch vinyl on my turn-table, and I’m looking at the new 6-LP box set of ELECTRIC LADYLAND six feet from me.

    The music is still alive fifty years after Jimi stopped fingering the frets, but the remaining frets that foul play was involved in his demise also are just as resonant as they were the day he died.

    The fact that Gary Jucha’s fairly recent book of frequently asked questions on Jimi Hendrix (2013) contains an interesting chapter on Jimi’s mysterious death indicates the growing awareness that it was, indeed, mysterious. And the fact that Jucha concludes that it deserves deeper investigation also indicates that the discussion will not easily be put to rest by people who set up websites with names like “Jimi Hendrix Murdered?” so they can liken the theme to the X-Files.

    There are always other places to go when the gatekeepers double down on closing the universe of discourse.

    • Scott,

      I’m disappointed in you. The inherent pettiness in your latest comment barely merits a response… If I were in your shoes, I would have apologized for what seems to have been an emotional outburst and stopped this negativity.

      You, however, doubled down and only made yourself appear childish and, even worse, cowardly.

      There isn’t a person on this planet (if they’re being honest) that would have read what you wrote in your original comment – when you encouraged me to muzzle Ivana – any differently than I did. You can try to backpedal all you want in an effort to make yourself look less ignoble, but your original meaning remains clear.

      “…by allowing this provocateur named Ivana to slander individuals who post material…”

      So, I should not allow her? As you well know, the only way I could do that is to block her or to edit what she wrote. In other words, to silence her.

      It is you that has sought to silence the discourse here, Scott. Only you.

      Oh, and since you’re complaining about slander, it is amusing that you slandered me in that same sentence I quoted you on. As I have stayed completely out of this discussion, there was no reason for you to go personal and start taking shots at me just because you were frustrated with Ivana. That’s equivalent to the guy that goes home and kicks the poor dog because he had a bad day at work.

  123. Flyswatter, are we reading the same books because that is where I am getting this information from? Or are these authors all intentionally misleading or offering conflicting information? It is obvious that I have hit a nerve where some of you are concerned but this is what forums are all about. We need diverse information to get to the truth. So far, unfortunately, I have not learned anything new or had my opinion changed by most things posted here. What I have taken from this website is the willingness of some to manipulate the truth and the gullibility of others who take whatever is offered without question.

    • Not a question of what books we are reading. It’s a question of you being blatantly illiterate on your end. That fact that say you haven’t learned anything new speaks volumes right there. I’m quite certain that you didn’t know anything about Albert Allen’s witnessing until it was pointed out here

  124. My opinions are just that nothing more nothing less. I did not mean to slander anyone. People are entitled to their own opinions as diverse as they may be. I thought this was meant to be a forum for people to give their opinions and I thought I would add to the discussion. I did not realise this would cause the tension that it has this was never my intention. Please don’t take this so seriously it is not meant to be. Thank you to Justin but I think it might be best if I no longer post on this forum. I think it suits like minded people best.

    • Ivana pretends to be the victim of biased commentors who is only offering “diverse opinions” but anyone who is schooled in this subject can see she is only referencing sources that cast doubt on the murder evidence while blatantly ignoring most of the credible evidence that overturns her material…Flyswatter and myself are well-versed in the sources Ivana is referencing…They are sources that either did not bother to look for the evidence we present or deliberately avoided it…Anyone who is well knowledged in the subject will know that Ivana’s points are regressive to what we are showing and represent claims that have been overturned by our evidence…Again, if this were a court room the judge would look at what we present and say that it had already refuted what Ivana counters with…So Ivana’s pretending that she is simply offering her opinion dishonestly ignores the fact the better evidence we offer makes all of what she offers moot and unsubmittable…Ivana applies no critical thinking to what she posts or its context…Just the fact she read it somewhere makes it a valid “opinion” and counter evidence despite the huge qualifications we have explained regarding what she posts and its true context…This is the big leagues Ivana and you can’t do that…It doesn’t matter if you lack the skill or educated background…

      You called us restricters of broader information and manipulators of the gullible…The fact you don’t have any sense of how badly that is misapplied, considering the amount of abuse and information restriction that comes from the official side, says all anyone needs to know about you…If you had any credible sense of the subject you would realize we are the combators of the real restriction and manipulation of the gullible who don’t question information…Your input is painfully backwards and superficial…It attacks the good guys in favor of the liars and evidence-avoiders…The worst offense you commit is you claim you haven’t learned anything from this site or seen anything that would change your opinion while anyone can see you ignored the most important proof you called for…The real truth is this comments section contains probably the best information on the internet that has radically advanced the true understanding of what happened to Jimi and vitiated the official story…Your innocent act of only offering an opinion while making vicious accusations against our credibility isn’t acceptable Ivana…Either make your accusations and back them up or follow your own advice and quit because of your admitted lack of qualification…

      It is a lie to say nothing new was learned from this comments section…I happen to know that my forensic arguments are unique and offer proof Jimi was murdered at an official legal medical level…Several of us have noticed that you never once attempted to answer my forensic arguments as well as other damning evidence…And you can’t answer them by ruminating over irrelevant denial quotes…That’s going backwards and moving away from the relevant material without ever directly addressing it…We can prove Jimi was murdered Ivana…We are just waiting for you to actually answer what we posted instead of evading it with the irrelevant denial quotes you respond with…Please, practice what you preach and commit to a specific and detailed scenario of how you think Jimi died…Since you are so demanding of evidence, that is a double-edged sword and applies to you as well…So please spell-out how you think Jimi died and connect it to a firm timeline…I’ll prove to you that it can be disproven by the real evidence you are ignoring…You fail to realize, Ivana, that this isn’t about opinions, it’s about facts and if you are going to step on the toes of the best in the business you’re going to have to answer them…For the life of me I can’t understand how anyone could look at what we’ve posted here and decide to take the side of darkness against Jimi and his murder…

      • Buster the whole premise of this website is the suggestion that Jimi was murdered. I am not making accusations of murder you are. It has been established that Tappy was lying about the murder of Jimi Hendrix by Michael Jeffrey since MJ was in Spain confirmed by two people. This is the foundation of your argument/evidence. Please then tell me who the murderer is. Eric Burdon, Alvenia Bridges, Eric Barrett, Gerry Stickells and Terry Slater were all at Monika’s flat that morning why then did they not bother to question her about the copious amounts of red wine oozing from Jimi? The coroners report states that Jimi died from inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication not the red wine. The red wine scenario is added years later. To further add fuel to the fire we have the Aleem twins startling revelation decades later. Why did they not speak up before or indeed during Kathy’s investigation? I have a real problem with people who speak up decades later about the supposed murder of Jimi when most of the people who were closest to Jimi have passed away and cannot defend themselves. This then gives rise to speculation, gossip, hearsay, innuendo, distortion of the truth and downright lies.

      • And like Buster said, Ivana keeps cuckoo-birding the same regurgitated bunk that has already been answered and debunked countless times.

        Ivana’s just yanking her own chain, because there is no way anybody can pretend to have missed the answers to her questions as many times as she pretends to have done.

      • No Ivana…You can’t get away with that…Like the deniers who run the websites you are sourcing from, you ignore everything that is written and try to get away with repeating Bob Levine’s claim that Tappy admitted it was all bullshit as the one and only piece of evidence in all this…You can’t get away with that because you are violating the rules of evidence you pretend to be promoting…You are not telling the truth when you try to put words in my mouth and say Levine’s claim is the basis of my argument…You wish it was the basis of my argument but the truth is it is the basis of YOUR argument and it isn’t good enough…As I have already posted and you chose to ignore, Tappy is a much more complex person with a much deeper background than you acknowledge…I discussed that background extensively with Tappy in phone calls…You are also ignoring that Bob Levine was a man with a background with Jeffery that involved mafia loans and other dubious business…Both Tappy and Bob were persons who did not want to reveal their true background or doings so any knee-jerk denials from them can’t be taken at pre-emptive face value like you try to force while ignoring any greater evaluation of them and their total background or motives…You can’t get away with ignoring that when Bob was first asked his opinion on this in the 1990 interviews for ‘Setting The Record Straight’ he pointed serious suspicions of guilt towards Michael Jeffery…You are a highly dishonest person Ivana…I have notified you of this true background on Levine and you have ignored it each and every time in order to return to your grossly over-simplified grasping on Levine’s denial…There is much more to both men and their witnessings than you allow…Your sole source is an out of context, under-investigated quote from an article where the reporter made no effort to seek out the greater facts…In no way has it been established that Tappy was lying about Jeffery’s confession…And if he was it was only because he couldn’t tell the real way he learned about it because it was too revealing of Tappy and his true alliances at the time, or it was too dangerous…Your level of detective work is very poor…

        The wine was not oozing from Jimi when those Jeffery employees were there…It was corked-in by dried vomit that the ambulance attendants said they couldn’t penetrate…It is very obvious to anyone who isn’t trying to force denial that the reason those Jeffery employees didn’t question Monika is because she told them Jimi had been murdered and all those employees knew the reason why…Monika had witnessed Jimi firing Jeffery…Only a fool would not realize she had obviously told them and, as Jeffery employees, they already knew of Jimi’s desire to fire Jeffery…You are quite naive if you don’t ask yourself why those Jeffery employees never gave interviews or said a word about it from that day on…They knew from the first moment and that is why they did a 5 hour clean-up with Jimi’s dead body on the bed…This isn’t rocket science and there are things I can’t tell you that prove it even further…

        You’re just repeating the same denier bullshit Ivana…I asked you to please spell-out a detailed description of how Jimi died and connect it to a firm timeline…You refused to do it and by doing that you forfeit and concede the debate…All you are telling people is you refuse to go in to those details because you know you won’t last long and you’ll be refuted…You are telling people that all you have is that out of context partial information that you are running to in desperation as an escape from our better evidence…You are violating the rules of evidence because we have shown adequate reference to the wine being witnessed at the time by the Chief Coroner…We have also shown that Albert Allen witnessed the Samarkand photos long before Monika made them public, which proves his witnessing was real…You’re not being honest here…Dr Bannister was not asked about the wine until a false accusation of malpractice for not doing tracheostomy was made against him by Monika in 1990…What counts the most here is I asked you why Scotland Yard never interviewed Dr Bannister or asked him about the wine?…Why did they never seek-out the nurses?…These are the questions that count the most and you have failed to answer them every time I ask them…You also totally ignored that we have caught the second doctor, Dr Siefert, in a direct lie where he said on video that Jimi was covered in wine but then said he detected no alcohol on Jimi…You apparently pose yourself as a strict critic of witnessing but you ignore these pure examples of guilt and seem to have no objections over them…

        Sorry Ivana but you are violating the rules of evidence and cannot answer direct evidence like this by once again referring to your bogus self-referencing cycle of denial claims taken from your denial websites…It doesn’t work that way and you must answer these things honestly and directly…If you don’t you are only telling people you can’t admit their credibility…As long as you contemptuously avoid committing to a clearly-described scenario of how Jimi died and attach it to a firm timeline you lose…You have to be able to do that at this stage of the game and not doing so is a concession of the debate at a court room level…

      • Buster please answer the question I have asked you. Who murdered Jimi Hendrix? You are making this accusation so please answer it. Please no long winded answers.

      • Ivana is absolutely correct. Buster and Flyswatter only rely on reading conspiracy books for their “evidence”. Those are only designed to sell books for money. Not to tell the truth. They will believe any false claim as long as it works for their phony murder conspiracy. Even when their false stories are debunked like Tappy Wright’s they still try to use it or add a new conspiracy on that. That’s pathetic.

        Not a single doctor was recorded speaking or documenting anything about wine in Hendrix’s lungs in 1970. Not one word of it. Not in any official reports either. They had access to every person in the media asking them questions. They said nothing.
        They said nothing in the 70’s or 80’s either. Only when Doctor Bannister read Electric Gypsy and thought he was going to be sued of malpractice did this wine claim come about. Then all these fake wine stories were written in all these fake books to make money. All these phony wine claims were proven false.

      • Looks like Buster can’t answer a simple question that Ivana asks him. Buster writes another looooong useless post of nothing instead of answering a simple question.

        Buster claims Hendrix was murdered. So why can’t Buster answer a simple question? Isn’t Buster “the self proclaimed foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix? He should know the answer. I would like to know it too. Who murdered Hendrix Buster? No long rants. Just answer it since you’ve made the murder claim.

      • Sorry Buster, you have no forensic argument. You don’t even know what the term “forensic” means.

        Using Bannister’s fake claim of “5 bottles of wine inside Hendrix” as you match up the blood alcohol numbers on Jimi’s autopsy report is not “forensics”. Everybody should be laughing their heads off at that.

        Forensics are the actual samples of physical evidence.

        Where is all the wine that Bannister claimed to have seen that day? Where did it go?

        There was no “hardened corked vomit” in Hendrix that oozed wine after. Nice try. That could never happen. Boy, you sure love to tell phony made up tails to spin your b.s. murder theory.

      • So again we have “off the record claims” by Buster for his “so called evidence”. Totally laughable.

        There you go again Buster trying to defend Tappy Wright who lied about Michael Jeffery. Jeffery was in Spain. Confirmed by two sources. You need to defend Tappy Wright cuz if you don’t that eliminates your main suspect Jeffery. Without Wright’s phony claim you have no case. You still don’t have a case cuz Jeffery had no motive to kill Hendrix and he was in Spain.

        There was no “corked in vomit” as you’re trying to claim. There was no “corked in vomit” at the flat that oozed red wine later at the hospital. More made up stuff.

        Monika never witnessed Jimi firing Jeffery. Where did you get that from?
        The chief coroner Gavin Thurston never saw any wine cuz he never described wine in the final autopsy report. Thurston stated “barbiturates” just like Bannister said in his press release to the media on 9/18/70.

        You would be laughed at of a court room with your non existent evidence and only made up quotes and stories you use.

  125. Very interesting what Buddy Miles told his new bass player that he hired in 1970 to help him finish recording his album “Them Changes”. A man by the name of Jack DiGiovanni (who personally knew both Buddy Miles and Mike Jeffery) has told me directly that Buddy’s story about Jeffery dosing Jimi with bad acid at the BOG Madison Square Garden is 100% correct & Jack also said that from day Jimi died until the day Buddy died, that Buddy believed Jimi had been murdered.

    • Flyswatter Jimi said in a few interviews he thought he would not live to 28 also adding that the next time he visited Seattle would be in pine box.

      • Hey Ivana. Well, no joke, Captain Obvious. That was months later on from when Buddy Miles told that to David Hull.

        So what’s your point? You make none, whatsoever.

      • Never does it dawn on ill-informed Ivana that Jimi was telling that to people because he had been trying to sever himself from Jeffery and Jeffery had made threats…Jimi knew what was happening around him with the kidnapping and other dirty moves like the heroin bust and knew he was in danger…That is the correct context of what he told Chuck Wein in that quote…God forbid Ivana would ever see it for what it was…

    • That is exactly right, Buster. And just look down and she’s asking “who murdered Jimi” without realizing that this flying roughshod in the face of the fact that she’s been asked a whole slew of questions that she’s failed to answer.

      I say it’s time to just ignore her & not respond directly to her and let her find her own answers to her stupid questions.

      • Just what I suspected putting it back onto me. I do not need to answer anything as I am not the one making accusations of murder you are. Your claims are invalid if you do not answer this question. I will be asking it until you supply that name. I am sure you do not want to appear as a group of pranksters and tricksters or is it that you do not know the answer. I will, like you suggested, answer it for you. There was no murder. That’s right Jeffrey was in Spain and Jimi tried to phone him there and Michael was upset that he missed Jimi’s call. Trixie Sullivan had said that they were going to fly over to Spain and meet up at Jeffrey’s club Sgt Pepper at his request or is this just myth and fantasy by a deluded Trixie Sullivan. Wright admitted he made the whole thing up and so why are still holding on to something that has been exposed as a lie? I will answer it for you no other place to go with your assumption since you have been banned and panned from Crosstown Torrents and Electric Guru. It is time to let go of this nonsense Buster, Flyswatter and Scott. Jimi died in 1970 and most of his personnel are dead as well.

  126. Buster I asked you answer a question. Who murdered Jimi Hendrix? You are making accusations of murder so please answer it. I want the name. It’s funny that we are reading the same books and getting two different perspectives or it is that I am the one seeing things for what they really are? You work this one out Buster. I think you get the gist of what I mean. Don’t forget to answer the question who murdered Jimi Hendrix?

  127. (Greetings! Welcome to this 3 Part Series where I debunk this “imbibed wine” fairy tale that conspiracy theorists use for their phony Hendrix Murder claim. These conspiracy theorists loosely throw around names and quotes that most people have no idea about. They try to sound credible using doctors and quotes. But as you are about to read it is only phony b.s. that is easily debunked.)

    “Debunking The Phony ‘Imbibed Wine’ Hendrix Myth And Why It’s A Joke”

    Part One

    By Jason

    The tin foil hatters religiously use the wine myth for their fake Hendrix Murder conspiracy. Anything that mentions wine they use to sell their myth. Fraud sources and debunked stories are no problem for them. They use it anyway and create a new story behind it to keep the conspiracy going.

    They profusely defend frauds like Tappy Wright and Doctor Bannister since they give support to their fake murder myth. The tin foil hatters know they are on shaky ground with these two phonies so they use another myth to try and seal the deal. Cue the “imbibed wine” myth as they trot out Dr. Gavin Thurston as their safe bet to convince the world of a Hendrix murder.

    The tin foil hatters use Thurston as their final piece of the puzzle to convince the public their theory is legit. Thurston and the “imbibed wine” myth is what the tin foil hatters claim for their “forensics” and their ultimate claim of a Hendrix murder. But as you are about to see this “imbibed wine” claim is more phony than a 3 dollar bill.

    The first thing you need to know is that this “imbibed wine” story was described by Sharon Lawrence who added this little passage in her book in 2001. Sharon states that Jack Meehan, a UPI correspondent, spoke with Dr. Gavin Thurston in 1970 after the Hendrix autopsy was performed. Sharon said that Thurston told Jack Meehan that Hendrix was “fairly imbibed with wine”. Then Meehan only told Lawrence about this story and nobody else. Tin foil hatters use that quote as their evidence of a Hendrix murder. They use that quote to claim Bannister was credible with his phony story of Hendrix’s lungs filled with wine.

    Lawrence’s book was already riddled with made up quotes and errors. She claimed Jimi was born at a family friend’s house which is false. Sharon made up a fake quote about Jimi’s mother and what she said to Jimi before she passed away. Lawrence needed a dramatic touch for the book so she made up fake stories to get the reader’s sympathy.

    Sharon provides no documented evidence of a Meehan and Thurston meeting ever happening. We are only relying on her second hand quoted account of what a coroner supposedly told her colleague. We are relying on her to tell us this 1970 quote after she already made up several fake quotes in her book. And hilariously we have tin foil hatters yelling “slam dunk” based on a claimed second hand account from Lawrence that never even happened.

    Are we to believe what she says after she has already lied before? Sharon committed felony perjury in a court of law in Toronto. Sharon auctioned off empty cigarette packs claiming they belonged to Hendrix from the 60’s to cash in on his name. From her past behavior she has proved herself to be a liar and a fraud. Printing false accounts of Hendrix in her book along with obvious made up quotes makes this woman not credible. After all that, we can say this woman is not a reliable source. Except the tin foil hatters give her great praise for peddling a phony quote that they use to claim their phony murder theory.

    Sharon Lawrence was a UPI reporter in the 60’s and 70’s. Why didn’t she report this “imbibed wine” story then? Isn’t that what a reporter is supposed to do? Isn’t a reporter supposed to report important news? Wouldn’t “imbibed wine” be important to tell the world as a cause of death? She wouldn’t want to tell the world something major about Jimi Hendrix who was a friend? Doesn’t add up and the “imbibed wine” myth is starting to fall a part for the tin foil hatters.

    Why would Sharon Lawrence “forget” about this important “imbibed wine” event from September 1970 and not think of it again until 2001 when she wrote her book? Because it never happened and she made the whole thing up in 2001, that’s why.

    Why didn’t Sharon bring it up in the 90’s when Kathy Etchingham was doing her investigation? Sharon claims this “imbibed wine” story just “popped back” into her head again as she was writing her book. Of course it just popped. It popped into her head as she made it up with her other fake quotes in her book.

    You can’t tell me that Sharon Lawrence who was a seasoned reporter and a friend of Jimi Hendrix would “forget” and then fail to report this major revelation of Jimi being “imbibed with wine” in the news. This story would have changed everything from Hendrix just being a drug casualty. Sharon didn’t report it because it never happened and she just made it up in 2001. Some good friend she turned out to be.

    All these people who were associated with Hendrix never said a peep during the 70’s or 80’s about their “major stories”, did they? They all waited until the mid 90’s and into the 2000’s when everybody was writing a book. Each person outdid each other with a new “startling revelation” as a hook for their book so they could sell copies. These frauds and shysters are no friends of Hendrix who just used the man’s dead name to make money off him. Disgraceful.

    Now I know the tin foil hatters reading this will be foaming at the mouth and screaming. They’ll be accusing me of trying just to discredit Lawrence as they call me a “troll”, “murder denier”, and all the other b.s. they use as a defense. I have more to discredit their phony “imbibed wine” myth with and that will be in Part 2. I’m just digging in with more to come. So enjoy some more of this phony “imbibed wine” debunking coming up in Part 2.

    • As to Jason, there’s an old adage “If it looks, feels, and smells like an obnoxious troll it probably is”…

      It is painfully obvious that Jason is an internet troll who is desperately trying to use cheap defamation to discredit witnesses who he knows are important to the murder evidence…It is what weaseling defense lawyers do when they know their client is guilty…Jason’s smear tactics are so obviously cheap and dishonest that he saves you the time of answering them point for dishonest point…You can simply point out the obvious form of his denial trolling and see that he is obviously trying too hard to discredit persons he unconsciously knows are legitimate witnesses…

      Sharon Lawrence was Jimi’s friend and was in London the night Jimi was murdered because she went there after breaking off from a tour with the Rolling Stones after hearing Jimi was in trouble…She was a professional rock reporter and was on the job…Jack Meehan worked for the same United Press International and was in London at the time…On September 29th Meehan went and interviewed The London Coroner’s Office Chief Gavin Thurston over Jimi’s death…As much as Jason would like us to let him lead us with his denial in a wholly dishonest narrative, the fact Sharon posted a date for the interview shows recorded knowledge of it and therefore its realness…Jason is just a scummy internet troll who thinks he’s clever but his stuff disintegrates in your hands with the slightest touch because it is spun in the infernal feeble mills of make it up as you go along denial and is the faulty fabric of its origins…For Sharon to have a precise date almost certainly means she kept a record of the event because she was a reporter…Jason wants us to drop our minds and intelligence and listen to his idiotic trolling…Like I said, if lying Jason went and actually confronted Sharon Lawrence I’m sure she would quickly provide proof of Meehan’s interview…And if he dared call her a liar to her face she would most certainly rip Jason a most enjoyable new one in public and put him in his deserved place…Just because Sharon didn’t report it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen…You are a very poor detective Jason with very dull limited one track thinking…

      • Exactly, both Jason and Ivana are a pair of lying-denying pigbreeders that wallow in their own pigshit mire of denial of reality. All they do is pull fabrications out of their asses repeatedly & oink out the same denials over & over again, and accuse others of that which they are guilty of.

      • More weak character attacks from Buster with no proof or evidence. All he can weakly say is I’m a “troll” and nothing more while denying the facts. I’ve posted the facts. You have not.

        Everything I wrote about Sharon Lawrence are facts and can easily be checked. That is not character defamation.

        If “imbibed wine” was so important Sharon Lawrence would have reported it herself in 1970 and not wait 31 years to add it in a book.

        Funny how Buster protects Sharon Lawrence on this web page but gave her book a 1 star review on Amazon posting under the handle of “Ralph Yates”. What is your agenda Buster?

    • Buster and Flyswatter both proved me right. Look at the last paragraph I wrote above. They have no evidence to refute what I said. Only cheap character attacks cuz they don’t like hearing the truth. Pathetic.

  128. Welcome back Jason. I’ve been over at Crosstown Torrents reading some of their comments. I came across someone called Scrum Drum who sounds eerily like Buster’s long winded rants. I know that Buster was banned from this site and Scrum Drum has the word banned written under his name. I have the feeling they are the same person. He is good at hiding his true identity as I assume “Buster” is also a pseudonym. So much truth in your last comment.

    • Hi Ivana,

      Thanks, it is the truth and it’s why Buster and Flyswatter are in meltdown mode. That’s very interesting. I’ll have to check out that site and read the comments.

  129. Still waiting for you answer to my question Buster. Who murdered Jimi Hendrix? Flyswatter that is a scarf around Jimi’s neck and the reason he was still wearing it was because he was found fully clothed on top of bed covered in vomit dead from the high dosage of Vesparax in his system. Jimi choked on his own vomit. The sleeping pills suppressing his coughing reflex. This is well established.

    • I’ll give you credit Ivana…You’ve got a healthy set of balls for a woman…You’re not being honest because anyone can read the responses and see my points that you evaded, and have the arrogance to think you have the right to ignore, forced you to do that hail mary pass you threw in response…If you think that people don’t see you as the clueless internet troll you are who admits that she is just learning of this for the first time from reading Crosstown Torrents, then you’re living in your own delusion…I am a person who knew and befriended Tappy Wright and Bob Levine for several years…You are a person who reads an article by a hit piece reporter who was only seeking to discredit Tappy, and possibly doing it for an unknown agency, and you immediately try to force that over everything while deliberately ignoring a much more subtly-accurate version of the events as I learned of them from the actual participants…Ivana, you can troll that one quote for the rest of your life, it still isn’t going to change the true interpretation I got from Tappy and Bob in person from knowing them…Nor does your regressive and dishonest use of that one liner quote serve as justification for your ignoring Bob’s true context via his original 1990 ‘Setting The Record Straight’ comments where he openly pointed fingers at Jeffery…If you ignore this true record of Bob then I’m going to ignore you…You get sloppier and more primitive (dishonest) according to the amount of evidence you’re ignoring…If you think you own this conversation or are in charge of the debate by ignoring everything and just repeating that refuted simplistic shit you post you’re stupid because wiser minds can see all the legitimate evidence you’re ignoring…Denial trolls always have to be aggressively in control of the narrative, otherwise it would be too clear they are ignoring good evidence and not giving adequate response…It is painfully apparent that Ivana is a clueless troll who thinks she can block out the best version of the events ever presented by means of repeating a simplistic denial dialogue she picked-up by skimming the internet…She’s not really interested in the truth and it is obvious she’s going to respond to anything she sees with this rotten denial…

      I have already beaten Ivana because, no matter her claims to the contrary, she does have to answer certain facts…Ivana forfeited this debate when she refused to post and commit to a definite scenario of the events that is connected to a precise and firm timeline…I suspect she won’t do that for 2 reasons…This first is that she doesn’t know enough about the subject she is recklessly denying and doesn’t want to admit she can’t produce such a timeline because of her lack of knowledge or qualification…The second is because she knows that as soon as she makes those commitments she’s going to be outside her simple-minded denial script and will be quickly shredded by the real facts…Sorry Ivana but your self-excuses aren’t working and they aren’t fooling anyone…You lost on that count alone…

      In 1975 Monika went to Caesar Glebbeek’s Amsterdam radio show and said: “Jimi was murdered by the mafia for sure” on the air…If it was “established” that Jimi died of a drug overdose and choked on his own vomit, why in the world would Monika say something like that?…Tell me Ivana…How much is moronically repeating “Tappy admitted it was all bullshit” over and over going to get you in ignoring Monika’s comment and its more than obvious implications?…Nice try but you haven’t put a scratch on this short of your stupid contempt…

  130. Buster she was covering her tracks about her actions that morning putting the blame onto others. Pure and simple. Here we go again about the mafia story so it’s the Mafia now not Michael Jeffrey who murdered Jimi. I’ve got to hand it to you Buster the way you try to make others look incredulous with your debunked ramblings is a common ploy designed to make you look like the authority. I did’nt realise this was a race with the use of the word “beaten”. And by the way look at all the others who Monika blamed for their actions that morning contributing to Jimi’s death. The nonsense you believe in Buster and the myths you still try to hang onto make you look like the loser in all of this.

    • You’re doing it again Ivana…You’re retreating in to pure trolling blather in order to evade answering information…You’re just a flat out trolling denier with a denial agenda…You have no intention what so ever of honestly or objectively considering the facts…

      What you wrote above doesn’t make sense…By 1975 Monika had succeeded in escaping scrutiny and had gotten away with it…She didn’t need to cover her tracks, she had already gotten away with it…Your answer doesn’t make sense because going and saying over the air to a huge audience that Jimi was murdered doesn’t serve to cover her tracks…It does just the opposite and opens up serious new questions that she’ll have to answer…What you write doesn’t make logical sense…You speak as if you are instructing through informed skepticism but your material shows a serious lack of critical thinking to the point of moronic disqualification…So, like usual, you haven’t answered the point…Your point about switching from Michael Jeffery to the mafia is idiotic and is being used to evade the point you still haven’t credibly answered…You are failing to realize that at the time of that 1975 interview Monika didn’t need to put the blame on others…No one was blaming her at that point…She didn’t need to cover her tracks because there were no tracks to be covered at that time…So you still haven’t answered the point of why would Monika risk bringing serious attention to herself by claiming the mafia murdered Jimi?…

      You haven’t debunked anything I’ve written…You are obviously uncredible, as can be discerned by the way you answer direct points (or don’t answer) with content-less trash-talk that isn’t connected to any of the points that are being made…You lost this debate by being repeatedly unable to answer my challenge to you to commit to a specific scenario and timeline…You’re not fooling anyone Ivana…You’re not doing that because you have no knowledge of what you are talking about and can’t do it…And your trolling responses don’t serve as adequate substitute…

  131. Jason, have you read the latest offerings from Buster and Flyswatter LOL and I’m still laughing. I thought Monika was supposed to have been in on the murder of Jimi along with Jeffrey but now Buster sides with Monika and he accuses the Mafia. Talk about back-pedalling. Of course this also puts into question everything else that Buster holds true. Tappy Wright, Bob Levine, the Aleem twins stories. This only re-inforces that everything Buster has written is nonsense. Buster has stated he befriended Wright and Levine both of whom later denied the murder scenario. Congratulations to Buster. I’m looking forward to reading your next post Jason and further debunking what Buster, Flyswatter and Scott put out there.

    • Don’t run to your trolling partner Ivana…Answer what’s being written…You’re a liar and you offer a moronic level of discourse…Anyone can read what I wrote and see in no way did I accuse the mafia…What I did do is ask you to please respond to why Monika would say in public on the air in 1975 that the “mafia murdered Jimi for sure”?…Ivana is not honest and she has been avoiding giving an answer to that simple question every time I ask it…Anyone can look at our last few interchanges and see Ivana is clearly seeking to evade the best evidence and she is answering it with what is basically idiotic trolling that gives away the bankruptcy and lack of qualification of her position…No one who honestly read what I wrote could say I was agreeing with and endorsing Monika’s accusation against the mafia…You’re dishonest Ivana and you’re a liar…You’re deliberately misrepresenting what I wrote in order to avoid answering it…What I did write was a request for Ivana to explain why Monika did that?…Ivana said she did it in order to place blame on others and cover her tracks…When I responded that Monika did not need to place blame, since no one was blaming her in 1975, and therefore did not need to cover her tracks, Ivana answered with the dishonest evasion you see here…Ivana is doing her best not to answer why Monika would go on the air and say the mafia murdered Jimi in 1975?…Ivana is the one who is back-pedaling and she is doing it by lying…What she is stupidly avoiding answering is that saying Jimi was murdered would only bring more scrutiny to her and her story…So it doesn’t make sense that she would be trying to cover her tracks with that claim when she had already gotten away with it…

      Ivana’s material is cheap, shallow-minded, shows a serious stupid line of reasoning, answers very good questions with dumb answers that ham-handedly try to twist what was said in to stupid rationales…I agree with Flyswatter…Ivana is a lying troll who likes to reduce everything to the pig manure she prefers to dwell in in order to escape the good arguments as you can see her doing here…She’s a liar and knowing Bob Levine and Tappy Wright personally, both men went to their graves strongly believing Jimi was murdered, counter to the juvenile trolling teasing Ivana offers…

      Ivana lost this debate when she refused to post a clear and concise scenario of how Jimi died and connect it to a specifically detailed timeline…She can’t and won’t do that because it requires her to come out of the trolling mud pit and deal in legitimate discussion…

      • Quite correct. These lying-denying pig-breeders (like Jason and Ivana & we should probably start calling Jason, ‘Porky’ and Ivana, ‘Petunia’ ) fail to recognize something very signifcant.

        And that significant something is, if Jimi really had died accidently from choking on vomit as a result of barbitural overdose, then it would have been verified at that time by the doctors and ambulance men that attended to Jimi, with those same men being called to the initial Inquest to give testimony, and their identities would have been known to the public right from the get-go, instead of remaining unknown for over two decades (except for maybe Seifert, whose name was on one of the coroner’s forms) & there would have been no final decree of “Open Verdict”.

        Logic tells us that if the above had happened, then those testimonies would have spread like wildfire & been printed in all the newspapers at that time.

        But, such a thing NEVER HAPPENED & Porky lies when he says the doctors “had access to the media and said nothing”. That’s just Porky pulling a fabrication out of his anal cavity, as there is absolutely no record or documentation whatsoever that the attending doctors or ambulance men had any contact with the media, because it never happened & we know this because the media would have published it somewhere, if it had.

        Standby for another round of Porky and Petunia oinking out their lying fantasies of denial with no substance to back it up.

      • Just as I predicted. Petunia is back with her vain noise saying nothing more than “oink, oink……..oink, oink, oink”

      • haha Tappy Wright went to his grave knowing he was a lying fraud who made up the Michael Jeffery story with wine and pills that you continue to sell.

        Bob Levine said in several interviews that Jimi was never murdered including your pointless video.

        Quit lying.

      • Flyswatter is either ignorant or just trying to cover for the phony “Hendrix Murder Myth”.

        When a famous person dies tragically, the media has access to the doctors and the hospital so they can get the answers and report it to the public. This is standard procedure in the media. Flyswatter is ignorant of the protocol of the news business.

        If Sharon Lawrence claimed that Jack Meehan had access to Dr. Gavin Thurston, then that means any person in the media had access to him and the doctors at St. Mary Abbot Hospital. They aren’t just going to grant access to only Jack Meehan and nobody else. That is why Sharon Lawrence’s claim is a total joke.

        Doctor Bannister and Brown never stated anything about “wine” as Hendrix’s cause of death on 9/18/70. The official hospital statement reads ” He died of an overdose”. Bannister wrote the statement of Hendrix’s death and never included wine as a cause of death. Then in 1992 we have gallons of wine oozing out according to Bannister.

        If there were bottles of wine in Hendrix’s lungs Bannister and Brown would have stated that to the press in 1970, he died of “being drowned by wine”. They never said that cuz it didn’t happen.

    • I read them Ivana and they are really ridiculous and shows they have nothing to offer except for lame insults. Hilarious stuff. They can’t use Jeffery as their main suspect since he was in Spain. So I guess now they need a new conspiracy to claim it was the mafia LOL. Did you see above where Buster accuses Dr. Teare of illegally forging autopsy numbers cuz Jeffery demanded it? So now it’s the mafia who did it and Teare, Monika, and Jeffery in on this wine plot all together. The conspiracy continues….LOL

  132. Buster this has become tit for tat. If you want the truth I am not interested in what you write at all as it is all regurgitated nonsense. Still holding on to Wright and Levine. That says it all for me. You are the one making yourself look like a liar by repeating the same scenario over and over again. Remember that Caesar Glebbeek was a supporter of Monika inviting her to speak on radio. This is where she made the claim of murder by the Mafia. Everything Monika said about that morning has been discredited so taking that murder claim as factual is ludicrous. Monika drew attention to herself by claiming she was Jimi’s fiancé, by her many interviews and appearances at conventions but above all through her paintings of Jimi and her subsequent “feud” with Kathy. Michael Jeffrey was in Spain so where does this leave the murder scenario? Absolutely nowhere.

  133. Flyswatter you are making yourself look more and more like a gullible court jester. Do you really think anything you and Buster dish out here will make me change my opinion or mind on Jimi’s death. If you answered yes to that question then you are a bigger fool than I first thought.

  134. Flyswatter keep posting I don’t think I’ve ever laughed so much. Sorry but I don’t speak pig language like you do. I’ll give it a go though oink oink.

  135. (Welcome to Part 2 of this series where I debunk the phony “imbibed wine” myth that conspiracy theorists use for their phony “Hendrix Murder” claim. Part One establishes the background of the phony “imbibed wine” myth and Sharon Lawrence who made up the false claim. I clearly pointed out that Sharon used to be a reporter in 1970. So, why didn’t she report this “imbibed wine” story herself if it was actually true in 1970 instead of waiting until 2001 to include it in her book? Conspiracy theorists have no answer for that. I’ll give you the answer, she made up the whole story for her book. Now It’s time to continue on to Part 2 to further expose this “imbibed wine” myth.)

    “Debunking The Phony ‘Imbibed Wine’ Hendrix Myth And Why It’s A Joke”

    Part Two

    By Jason

    The conspiracy theorists “imbibed wine” story is looking even more bleak for them. Some use it to keep the fake story going for fraudulent reasons. Others like wearing a tin foil hat believing in conspiracy theories. Even when evidence and common sense refutes their nonsense they still want to believe in a hoax. Guess I will have to refute the rest of their phony theory.

    You’ve already met Sharon Lawrence the former UPI reporter who invented this fake “imbibed wine” story in 2001. Strangely, she never said a peep in 1970 when this was all relevant but waited until 2001 to surprise us with a big ‘hook” for her Jimi Hendrix fantasy book. Should all the conspiracy theorists thank her for that? We can all hear them now. “Thank you Sharon.”

    Let’s meet the next two players in this phony “imbibed wine” story. It’s brought to us by Sharon Lawrence who waited 31 years to spill the beans about this important event. She really didn’t really wait 31 years to remember this story. It just popped into her head in 2001 when she made it all up to write her book. What a fraud this woman is. Enter Jack Meehan who died in 1973 and Gavin Thurston who died in 1980 but were actually real people.

    So, Sharon Lawrence uses two dead people who were dead for decades as her source for her fake “imbibed wine” story. Imagine that. Two dead men who can’t refute her phony claim. That’s a favorite for fraud writers like Lawrence and Tappy Wright who can’t be challenged and for conspiracy theorists. Actually, Tappy Wright was proven to be a fraud by the late Bob Levine for making up fraudulent accounts of a crime.

    Jack Meehan was a correspondent for UPI who died after a long illness in September 1973. Meehan died just 3 years after Hendrix. Dr. Gavin Thurston the famous coroner in London who wrote the final report on the death of Jimi Hendrix passed away himself in June of 1980.

    Sharon Lawrence claimed in her book that Dr. Gavin Thurston told Jack Meehan that Hendrix was “fairly imbibed with wine”. Lawrence goes on to say, that Meehan then told her of that supposed account where neither one of them ever told a single living breathing person on the face of the Earth. Does anybody with an ounce of intelligence actually believe that?

    Before I continue, let’s make one thing perfectly clear about why this whole story is totally made up by Lawrence. Jimi Hendrix just died a tragic unexpected death and both of these people are reporters who just got the biggest story of their career. You mean to tell me neither of these people would bother to report this anywhere especially when everybody was looking for answers to why Jimi died? Lawrence or Meehan wouldn’t want to share this story with the world who are both reporters? They wouldn’t tell Jimi’s family, a friend, Hendrix associate, or any other media colleagues? Both reporters would stay silent and not say a peep about it until Sharon Lawrence finally had this “pop into her head” when she wrote her book? Sorry, this is not how a reporter behaves when they get a huge story regarding a death of a famous person. I can see people shaking their head at this knowing full well that Lawrence made this whole thing up. Now back to the rest of this myth.

    So, we have a claim printed by Sharon Lawrence where there is no documented evidence of this ever happening. We only have her word that this took place. Coincidentally, both men who supposedly had this long conversation about Hendrix, have both been dead for decades and can’t confirm if this claim is even true. So, what we have here is another one sourced quote that holds no validity. Conspiracy theorists are famous for using dead people as their source because they can’t refute what was printed because they are both dead.

    Now any person with intelligence can see this for what it is, another fraudulent claim and a one sourced quote issued by a person who is not credible. As we dig deeper into this, you will see why it is totally made up and fake.

    Being “imbibed with wine” is a pretty serious revelation by Dr. Thurston according to Lawrence, don’t you think? Pretty serious enough to include in his final report, right? Pretty serious enough to make public to other reporters and the press, wouldn’t you agree? But yet, Thurston made no mention of “imbibed wine” in his final autopsy report nor did any other reporter on Earth know this important information from him. Are we to believe that Thurston would omit “imbibed wine” from his report and only tell Meehan on the sly? Are we also to believe that Jack Meehan would be the only “lucky” reporter to obtain this information from Thurston? This is just head shaking stuff people. Yes, it’s already looking like it’s the end for this phony “imbibed wine” story.

    As I’ve stated before, Dr. Thurston was a famous London coroner. Thurston was the deputy coroner to the Royal Household and presided over many famous cases. Thurston was a highly credited coroner and never failed to miss a single detail. Thurston made sure every minute shred of evidence was looked over and properly documented in his findings. This man was no run of the mill slob and was highly qualified in his work. Also, throw in Professor Robert Donald Teare and you have the best team available working on Hendrix.

    Speaking of Teare, he performed the autopsy on Hendrix and found no wine in his lungs and only vomit. Imagine that. And here Bannister claimed Hendrix’s lungs were flooded with wine over 20 years later and Teare never even saw wine in his lungs in 1970. If Hendrix’s lungs were flooded with wine, Teare and Thurston would have documented it. There also would have been signs of trauma identified which would show Hendrix as a forced drowning victim. Both expert forensic specialists like Thurston and Teare would have known foul play would have been involved. But nothing like that ever showed up in the autopsy. That’s why forensic science will always trump phony quotes and claims from decades later. It’s also why the murder theory is just a hoax because conspiracy theorists will always lose on actual documented evidence with science. Their theory is a joke and it’s why they can never prove any real evidence to support their claims except for phony quotes.

    So, nowhere in Thurston’s report does he mention anything about “imbibed wine”. If there was actually “imbibed wine” found in Hendrix, he would have included that pertinent information in his final report. He wouldn’t just decide not to include the most major finding in the autopsy. There would be no point to that. Thurston wouldn’t also decide to tell only one reporter (Jack Meehan who died in 1973) about this “historic finding” and tell nobody else on Earth. And two reporters Meehan and Lawrence who got the “biggest story of their career” wouldn’t just decide to keep it to themselves until Lawrence made her “imbibed wine” claim in her book 31 years later. One of them would have reported it if this was actually true, cuz that’s what reporters do. That’s why this is a phony claim that holds no validity that shows Lawrence clearly made this up for her book along with the rest of her fake claims.

    The tin foil hatters don’t have a leg to stand on when science refutes their garbage. There will be more to come as the rest of this “imbibed wine” fairy tale is destroyed coming up in the final Part 3.

    • Well said Jason. You would think the coroner, being the expect, would have noticed the red wine supposedly ingested by Jimi as the cause of death. Jimi had 18 times the dosage of Vesparax in his system enough for him to pass out quickly on top of the bed fully clothed. At some point he vomited choking on his own vomit.

    • We can just ignore this trolling asshole Jason who is obviously making it up as he goes along as long as people will pay attention to his denial trolling…I don’t see anyone taking his blowhard carnival huckstering seriously except his clueless partner Ivana…I especially like the trolling form Jason’s posts take of obviously just learning of this from us for the first time but then pretending he is teaching it to us as an authority when the truth is he just looked it up for the first time because we told him about it…Classic troll…

      Jason is an idiot and he gives short shrift to the fact Meehan and Lawrence worked for a conservative news organization that might not appreciate their exposing a CIA murder…But besides that, Jason stupidly reduces the issue to his moronic troll dialogue in order to avoid the greater evidence…These denial trolls always have to maintain the narrative and keep the discussion within the confines of their trolling evasions otherwise it will become too clear how much evidence they are avoiding and that is what Jason is doing here…It has already been explained that the wine was not an issue until Dr Bannister’s letter to Glebbeek in 1991 where he told Glebbeek that Jimi was drowned in a large amount of wine…Jason accuses Sharon Lawrence of holding back important forensic information, but he ignores the fact that there was no knowledge of the wine’s incriminating nature until 1991…Jason does this because he is just a sloppy troll who doesn’t really know what he is talking about and is just using anything he can think of in order to deny the witnessing…It shows he doesn’t have any intelligent knowledge of the evidence he is trollishly denying…

      Jason then tries to dishonestly imply that Dr Thurston would have included the wine in his final autopsy report had it been real…Even though we have more than adequately mapped a pure layer of covert corruption in this case, and the authorities reflecting that corruption in their actions, this crude troll Jason ignores that, ignores Jimi’s being listed on FBI’s Security Index, ignores Jeffery’s MI-6 status and habits, and interprets the lack of any official mention by Thurston as proof of its unrealness – when any responsible researcher would realize that the opposite is true and that Thurston’s unaccountable failure to follow-through on that wine was actually proof of covert suppression…Jason is dumb enough to hope we don’t notice that he is ignoring Dr Siefert’s being caught in a direct lie about the wine and claiming he detected none when he was on video claiming “Jimi was covered in wine”…Jason is a bullshit artist who hopes you get suckered in to his denial screed and don’t notice he is ignoring pure proof of the wine in Siefert’s lie…You see Thurston wasn’t the only one who was gotten to and made to cover-up the wine…Siefert was too…Americans don’t understand that Britain never had a Constitution so such interventions are not illegal…

      Another thing our carnival barker troll hopes you don’t notice is that Sharon Lawrence included a date for Meehan’s interview with Dr Thurston…She mentioned it happened on the 29th of September…Since Sharon was a reporter and was right in the middle of probably the most important rock story of her career is it very believable that she didn’t follow her training and take notes of the events as they unfolded?…Any fool would notice that if Sharon included a date for Meehan’s interview then she almost certainly recorded that event in some kind of notes…Does this risible twit Jason actually think Sharon was going to go back and tell her boss that she took no notes when she was right in the middle of it?…Nice try at stupid denial Jason but the fact Sharon included a date tells you she was recording real events as they happened, like was her job description to do…She mentioned the 29th because she obviously got it from her business colleague Jack Meehan and recorded it at the time…The reason she remembers the exact date is because 31 years later when she wrote her book she went back to those notes and retrieved the information…Thank you Jason for making the momentum kick back so strongly in my direction because of your stupid failure to deny important evidence…

      Jason only reveals his idiotic denial methodology by saying Dr Teare failed to record the wine at the autopsy…Jason is just showing the world his lack of knowledge of the case and incompetency by asserting Teare failed to register the wine at the autopsy…It has already been repeatedly shown that the wine was removed and dispensed of on Friday the 18th at the hospital…Dr Teare did not examine Hendrix until 3 days later on the 21st…This is what Jason calls a strong refutation yet he trips up on basic facts of the case because his sloppy denial doesn’t require much serious knowledge or consideration of the facts…Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi…Again, more disqualifying incompetence and ignorance from Jason served as victory…Quite self-revealingly bombastic and buffoonish… And, yes, that is why “forensic science will always trump phony quotes and claims”…

      Anyone who has a speck of sense will realize this blowhard horse’s ass Jason would quickly crumble if he ever confronted Sharon Lawrence directly with his easily refuted cheap bullshit…I guarantee you Sharon would quickly confirm Meehan’s interview and rip this idiot troll Jason a new one in short order…There’s nothing dumber than doing an end zone dance over an offering that actually proves our case more than anything and quickly collapses as soon as it is countered with the real facts…

      • LOL at Petunia below saying “Buster what you are presenting here is rhetoric”, not realizing that is all her and her brother Porky have done (hence Scott Thompson first calling her out as doing nothing but talking out of her anal sphincter), with no substance to back up what they are saying.

        Of course, any substance that is produced (such as the pic of Jimi wearing the jumper scarf that Doctor Bannister witnessed Jimi wearing and correctly identified), they just counter with non-sensical rhetoric with no substance to back up what they are saying.

        Just following the same protocol oh the man seen in the pic below:

      • Oh Buster…one more thing that shows how stupid Porky is with his “rhetoric”. He says:

        “Speaking of Teare, he performed the autopsy on Hendrix and found no wine in his lungs and only vomit. Imagine that. ”

        Not hard to imagine at all (except to stupid lying-denying trolls like Porky and Petunia). The wine had been suctioned out of Hendrix’s lungs using an 18-inch metal suctioning device 3 days before the autopsy was conducted. Simple as that.

        We do know the autopsy reported a collapsed lung. Brian Jones was a drowning victim & I’ve never seen any reports of him having collapsed lungs. Same with John Bonham and Bon Scott after they died from choking on their own vomit after heavy drinking binges — no reports of a collapsed lung or lungs caused by vomit asphyxiation.

        What would cause the collapsed lung that was found at Jimi’s autopsy? Most likely it would be that continued suctioning with that 18-inch metal suctioning device that Dr. Bannister spoke of.

      • Buster the clown continues to provide pure comedy for everybody reading. He repeatedly attacks my character while adding his own phony debunked conspiracy theory. Out of this entire useless post, Buster manages to refute and contradict his own phony murder theory. He also refutes the phony Tappy Wright claim as well. Hilarious! Thanks Buster!

        BUSTER says: October 14, 2010
        Jimi was murdered by classic CIA alcoholic waterboarding in combination with barbiturates.

        BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
        Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.

        The very first post Buster wrote on this site, Buster says Hendrix was forced drowned by “alcoholic waterboarding” with barbiturates. Even though waterboarding isn’t used as a method to murder someone, Buster is still clueless promoting his phony theory.

        Then on August 22, Buster refutes his own original phony murder theory by contradicting his own claim saying “which means no one would need to force wine into Jimi.”

        He first says Hendrix was forced drowned with pills and wine and now he says he wasn’t.

        See how Buster contradicts his own garbage and makes stuff up as he goes along? When his phony theory is refuted he completely changes it into something else. Very pathetic.

        Here is Tappy Wright’s bogus claim that Buster believes and manages to refute as well with his newly changed.contradiction.

        “I was in London the night of Jimi’s death and together with some old friends…we went round to Monika’s [Jimi’s girlfriend] hotel room, got a handful of pills and stuffed them into his mouth…then poured a few bottles of red wine deep into his windpipe. I had to do it. Jimi was worth much more to me dead than alive. That son of a bitch was going to leave me. If I lost him, I’d lose everything.” – Tappy Wright’s phony Michael Jeffery quote

        BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
        Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.

        Tappy Wright claimed in his phony quote that Michael Jeffery stuffed pills and wine down Jimi’s windpipe. That would have been done by force cuz Hendrix wouldn’t allow someone to do that to him.

        Buster the clown now refutes Tappy Wright’s phony claim that Jeffery forced pills and wine down Hendrix cuz Buster said “no one would need to force wine into Jimi.

        So, Buster now refutes his first post by claiming Hendrix was forced drowned with alcohol.

        Then he refutes Tappy Wright’s false story that Jeffery forced pills and wine into him

        Buster the clown refuted himself and Tappy Wright too. Hilarious! Buster can’t be taken very seriously with contradictions like this when he refutes the entire basis of his own phony murder claim. Head shaking stuff, man.

  136. Buster what you are presenting here is rhetoric. Of all the supposed opportunities the CIA had of murdering Jimi they chose an obscure flat in Notting Hill to do the deed with an equally primitive method. Of all the books that have been written about Jimi no-one implicates the CIA, the mafia or Michael Jeffrey except for the Aleem twins. So we are to suppose these authors are also clueless or is it that you are spinning a yarn here Buster? You have repeatedly accused Michael Jeffrey of murdering Jimi but we know he was in Spain. Then comes the Mafia who use equally as dangerous tactics. You have now reverted back to your original claim of the CIA. I think it takes a particular mindset to come up with the scenarios you put forward Buster and I do not think it is a healthy one. Jason and I have refuted your claims because we simply do not see any truth in them. As I have stated before using derogatory language in order to heighten your claims does not make you look any more credible it has the opposite affect.

    • You’re stupid Ivana and you’re too dumb to realize how intelligence-insulting your input is…You’re doing it again and answering good evidence with bloviating opinion and worthless rumination…Your input is useless because it violates the rules of evidence…Your posts answer specifics with generalities, facts with opinion, and move from a greater to a lesser…The form of your input disqualifies you because it always moves away from the evidence, which only shows the public that you are not honestly interested in the facts…

      As Flyswatter said, you are accusing us of what you are guilty of and it is YOU who is offering the rhetoric…If you were smarter and more credible you would realize the reason we have so much evidence is exactly because Jeffery had to rush his killing of Jimi because he fired him at 5pm on the 17th…All you and Jason are doing is ignoring our evidence and returning with a denial filibuster…It isn’t cutting it and people can see you are ignoring the evidence you are calling for and answering it with evasive blabber…Any skilled detective would see evidence of evasion of honest investigation in the circumstances of this case that could only be explained by covert control…You offer unintelligent input if you ignore the fact that Jimi was on the Security Index and therefore would be monitored by US Intel…That monitoring would have necessarily known about Jimi’s troubles with Jeffery and the rest of the evidence we are exposing, so it can be assumed Intel deliberately avoided recognizing and exposing what really happened, which then constitutes involvement…Because you are always seeking the shallow and evasive you move in the opposite direction of all this and therefore don’t offer any credible input…So the long and the short of it is we offer the best insightful skilled analysis that exposes a covert CIA murder and you offer useless internet trolling and denial…It is also inherently moronic for you to say Michael could not have murdered Jimi because he was in Spain…You are dishonestly ignoring that Michael had the motive because Jimi had fired him 12 hours earlier and he would have done jail time for the money he stole…Jeffery had to kill Jimi before he flew back to the protection US jurisdiction…It is also quite dishonest of you to ignore that the murder method was quite effective in concealing the true cause of Jimi’s death for all these years…Part of the reason they got away with it for so long was Monika’s key role in keeping up the official story, while you pretend to be a strict checker of facts, while not saying a word about Monika’s proven lies…

      Ivana: You lost this debate when you refused to spell-out a scenario of how Jimi died and attach it to a detailed timeline…You are not practicing what you preach…You are claiming Jimi died from choking on vomit after a drug overdose…We are at a level where you have to be able to articulate that on an evidence/forensic basis…If you refuse you are simply forfeiting the debate and do not have anything to say…You’re not fooling anyone Ivana…You know nothing about this and your main input is denial bullshit…

      • No doubt, Buster, you have to laugh at how Petunia just keeps oinking out her repeated dumb shit, such as this:

        ” Jimi was dead when he arrived at the hospital why would Dr Bannister be working on someone who was deceased. From my reading Jimi went straight down to the morgue he never went to emergency. This is what I mentioned in conflicting information”

        That’s absolute bullshit. Both Bannister and Seifert stated that they did work on him. What Petunia overlooks is they were dealing with a John Doe casualty with no clue about what had happened & how long he had been in the state that he was.

        We know that 30 minutes were spent on trying to revive Elvis Presley, even though they knew he was dead. Brian Epstein — attempts to resuscitate Epstein were made for 40 minutes before he was transported to the hospital, at which point medical personnel tried to revive him for another 20 minutes.

        Petunia’s statement of Jimi never being in emergency (casualty) is completely false & the pic below proves it, as it is a fragment of the coroner’s form (the full photocopy of it is nowhere to be found) & it clearly states “Unable to resuscitate”. Where else would they attempt to resuscitate other than emergency (casualty)? Petunia oinks out this nonsense about conflicting information, when in reality, it’s really just her blatant refusal to cite CORRECT information.

      • FLYSWATTER says: That’s absolute bullshit. Both Bannister and Seifert stated that they did work on him. What Petunia overlooks is they were dealing with a John Doe casualty with no clue about what had happened & how long he had been in the state that he was.

        We know that 30 minutes were spent on trying to revive Elvis Presley, even though they knew he was dead. Brian Epstein — attempts to resuscitate Epstein were made for 40 minutes before he was transported to the hospital, at which point medical personnel tried to revive him for another 20 minutes.

        Would any doctor seriously spend a half hour on a person who’s been already dead for hours? No. Siefert and Bannister both said any attempt was a formality. There was no half hour attempt or removing wine. You are proven wrong again.

        “Jimi was rushed into the resus[citation] room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes, he was dead.”- Doctor Siefert

        “On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality. – Doctor Bannister

        “Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time.” – Doctor Bannister

        Read these quotes. He was dead. It was a formality.

        BUSTER says: All you and Jason are doing is ignoring our evidence and returning with a denial filibuster…It isn’t cutting it and people can see you are ignoring the evidence you are calling for and answering it with evasive blabber.

        Yes, i am ignoring your crappy “evidence”. It isn’t evidence. It’s made up quotes, hearsay, innuendos, your made up conspiracy theories, outrageous claims with no evidence to prove.

        BUSTER says: Any skilled detective would see evidence of evasion of honest investigation in the circumstances of this case that could only be explained by covert control…You offer unintelligent input if you ignore the fact that Jimi was on the Security Index and therefore would be monitored by US Intel

        Now you spin a bogus conspiracy you made up for your “evidence”. I am ignoring it.

        BUSTER says: That monitoring would have necessarily known about Jimi’s troubles with Jeffery and the rest of the evidence we are exposing, so it can be assumed Intel deliberately avoided recognizing and exposing what really happened, which then constitutes involvement…Because you are always seeking the shallow and evasive you move in the opposite direction of all this and therefore don’t offer any credible input…So the long and the short of it is we offer the best insightful skilled analysis that exposes a covert CIA murder and you offer useless internet trolling and denial…It is also inherently moronic for you to say Michael could not have murdered Jimi because he was in Spain…You are dishonestly ignoring that Michael had the motive because Jimi had fired him 12 hours earlier and he would have done jail time for the money he stole…Jeffery had to kill Jimi before he flew back to the protection US jurisdiction…It is also quite dishonest of you to ignore that the murder method was quite effective in concealing the true cause of Jimi’s death for all these years…Part of the reason they got away with it for so long was Monika’s key role in keeping up the official story, while you pretend to be a strict checker of facts, while not saying a word about Monika’s proven lies.

        So you spin a phony theory you made up based on a false account. Jimi never fired Jeffery 12 hours earlier. You are lying.

        “While at the hotel, Hendrix made several telephone calls. Dannemann said he phoned his lawyer Henry Steingarten, asking him to find a way out of his contract with his manager Mike Jeffery, and producer Eddie Kramer, for whom Hendrix left a voice message.”

        Here is it….Monika said Jimi phoned his lawyer “looking for a way to get out of his contract” NOT that “Jimi fired Jeffery”…….so you lied again Buster…..and lost your phony murder motive….Jeffery was in Spain and wasn’t fired like you claim. How do you like them apples?

        You just make up stuff and look like a total clown. Some big expert you are. LOL

        So Buster, since Jeffery was in Spain and wasn’t fired as a motive to kill…..who murdered Jimi Hendrix?

  137. I do not need to back up anything as you are the ones making the accusations of murder. The way you operate is that a few know the truth and the masses are ignorant of it and need to be made aware of it. You claim to know the true events of that morning so please supply your sources, what your accusations are and who you are accusing. Your whole premise so far has rested on Michael Jeffrey but it is well known he was in Spain. Perhaps the folks of Crosstown Torrents shed light on your accusations long ago and revealed them for what they really are.

  138. Flyswatter, Jimi was dead when he arrived at the hospital why would Dr Bannister be working on someone who was deceased. From my reading Jimi went straight down to the morgue he never went to emergency. This is what I mentioned in conflicting information. So if that is the case where did he get the red wine scenario from. The red wine story came into play years later and no wonder there was no mention of the red wine in the autopsy. Read up on your facts and don’t use the information that best suits your purposes. Don’t forget to answer the questions from my previous post.

  139. Are you serious, Flyswatter? Jimi had been dead for five hours before the ambulance was called. The ambulance men could both tell in the state Jimi was in that he had been dead for a while. As is customary both these men would have spoken to the doctors on arrival at the hospital. Professor Teare identified in his report that Jimi had the Vesparax, Seconal, and amphetamine in his system. The high dosage of Vesparax in his system killed Jimi. As for the killing of Jimi by Michael Jeffrey what exactly is the evidence that you have? We are back to Jeffrey and Monika again are we? You are both myth makers and you continue to add to this ludicrous scenario. For what purpose is beyond me. You just look like fools who deal in fantasy. Dr. Seifert said they worked on Jimi for a few minutes believing that he arrived at the hospital dead. It was merely a formality. GET IT?

    • Good, you finally committed to a time of death…It is correct and matches Dr Crompton’s claimed 5:30am time of death from the undigested rice found in Jimi’s stomach at autopsy…

      The high dosage of Vesparax in Jimi’s system did not kill him…You have proven it yourself by admitting Jimi died around 5:30am…Jimi’s autopsy found a .7mg barbiturate blood level…While it is a dangerous level it is not an automatically lethal one for persons like Jimi with a known tolerance…Monika hired some German doctors to determine if her pills would have killed Jimi…They said the same thing – that the pills would not have killed him…You are making false statements that were determined to be opposite what you say by medical professionals…

      Again you are stupidly making us repeat already-posted information…The hospital report showed they worked on Jimi from 11:45 to 12:15 when they quit…Dr Bannister told me in person that it took him and Dr Siefert 20 minutes to suction the wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach before they could even attempt resuscitation…That 20 minutes is registered in the hospital report…There’s your proof of the wine for people who aren’t looking to trollishly deny anything they see…

      You are a fraud Ivana and you are quoting the doctor who was caught red-handed lying about the wine…That’s the doctor you are backing while ignoring the fact he was the proven liar between the two doctors…Every time I mention that we proved Dr Siefert was the liar and was caught making a serious lie over the wine you ignore it and troll us with name-calling like “myth-makers” and “fools”…I don’ t think so Ivana, and anyone can look at this thread and see you are ignoring evidence…

      You’re a liar Ivana because the number of pills Jimi took (9) was not enough to kill let alone in only 2 hours or less…That’s why I’m trying to get you to commit to a specific scenario because the Underwriter Laboratories case histories for Vesparax overdoses shows that people don’t die in less than 4 hours from doses of 10-15 tablets and Jimi only took 9 and had a known tolerance…You just locked yourself in to a 2 hour or less absorption period and science proves Vesparax can’t kill in only 2 hours or less for that dosage…So that means it had to be something else and the wine doctor Bannister witnessed had to therefore have been the cause of death…

      • That 11:45AM to 12:15PM timeline was published in Mitch Mitchell’s book that came out in 1990 & that was before Dr. Bannister wrote his letter to Harry Shapiro on Jan. 9, 1992. A pic of that can be seen below.

        Petunia(Ivana) states that Jimi had been dead for 5 hours , but never considers why nobody that was at the Samarkand that morning (Monika, Burdon, Bridges, Slater, Barrett, and Stickells) so much as lifted a finger to help to help Jimi & waited 5 hours to call an ambulance.

  140. So Buster just how many liars are we dealing with here? I go by the coroners report cause of death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. I, like you, am a bystander and onlooker in all of this so to call me a liar when I get my information from the biographies is pointless and silly. You are painting everyone as a liar yet you are keen to believe Dr. Bannister someone who fits in well with the wine theory. The pills were enough to kill him because they caused Jimi to choke on his own vomit. If Jimi took the pills with the wine we know this is a lethal combination. Jimi passed out quickly because he was fully clothed on top of the bed and perhaps the wine splattered about him as he fell unconscious as Michael Fairchild states in one of his possible causes. The ambulance was called five hours later as stated by Kathy Etchingham and Michael Fairchild. So Jimi had been dead for at least that long. Please produce official evidence which states that the wine caused Jimi’s death. The problem I have with all of this is an overwhelming need to prove that the wine caused Jimi’s death and refuting the reports that the high dosage of sleeping pills caused Jimi’s death. All of this points to you knowing the real truth and all of us being lead down a garden path of lies. I have a real problem with that Buster as it shows a manipulation and distortion of the official record.

  141. Flyswatter I have the Mitch Mitchell book. The verdict is inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication not the red wine. This is the official report. I agree with Mitch when he says it is all speculation since you can never really know what was going on in Jimi’s mind at the time. But from others accounts Jimi was supposedly in a very positive frame of mind and Chas Chandler disliked immensely the portrayal of Jimi as a sad figure when he states that Jimi’s life was full of fun. The people at the Samarkand that morning were reportedly cleaning the apartment or Monika hesitated in calling the ambulance. This had been suggested so I have no right to refute this as I was not present that morning. I can only go by what have read.

  142. Dr Bannister and Dr. Seifert did not suction anything out of Jimi it was in fact the ambulance officers who did this at the Samarkand Hotel. The vomit was dry and all the way down. They transported Jimi to St. Mary’s hospital where the doctors pounded Jimi’s heart for a short while but he was clearly flatlined/dead. It is the doctors job to pronounce someone dead and time of death. The officers both told the same story to Kathy Etchingham having had no contact in years during her investigation. Again no mention of the wine only dry vomit on Jimi’s clothing and surrounding bedding. Clearly, Dr. Bannister was being less than truthful in your conversation with him or this conversation never occurred. It was something you concocted. Please produce evidence of this meeting. If you want to read this for yourself go to Michael Fairchild carefully researched information.

    • Ivana: You might want to learn about what you are talking about before correcting some of the world’s best experts on the subject…You are too insolent to realize you are talking to some of the world’s best experts on the subject and are only making a fool of yourself…I know Michael Fairchild…I know or know of most of the biography authors you are referencing…If you bothered to credibly study the subject the actual quote from the ambulance attendants gotten by Kathy Etchingham was that the vomit was too hard and dry in the throat for them to clear an airway with their ambulance suctioning equipment…If you knew what you were talking about (which you obviously don’t) you would know that the ambulance attendants told Kathy that it was because their equipment could not penetrate that hard plug of vomit that they decided to get Jimi to the hospital so they could access equipment that could…This is a well known part of the official record that you are obviously clueless over but that doesn’t stop you from trying to correct two of the internet’s best experts on the subject with wrong information…

      You are dishonestly trying to interpret evidence in order to deny the wine…The truth is the hard plug of vomit that the ambulance men couldn’t penetrate at the Samarkand was broken through at St Mary’s and below it was wine that flooded Jimi’s stomach and lungs up to the throat…The hard vomit was like a cork and when they unplugged it the wine was beneath…This was evidence of wine that was poured in to Jimi until he could hold no more…Evidence of “overkill” to make sure the job was done and he was dead…Dr Bannister and Siefert took 20 minutes to remove the wine because every time they cleared the lungs they would refill from wine from the stomach…The reason there is no mention of the massive amount of wine in the body from the ambulance attendants is because they never got to it because of the hard blockage of vomit that their ambulance equipment couldn’t penetrate…It is right there in the record if you read about it…

      Ivana, you will not be able to find any other real drug/alcohol choking on vomit death that had so much vomit and so much wine with only a 5mg blood alcohol content…You keep saying Jimi was a perfectly ordinary choking on vomit overdose death…That isn’t true because you won’t find a single other real choking on vomit overdose death where the victim had tons of vomit and 5 bottles of wine flooding their lungs and stomach, with only a 5mg blood alcohol content…You won’t be able to do it because Jimi was murdered by having bottles of wine poured down his throat when he was deliberately given sleeping pills to make him pass-out…

      Try answering this directly instead of wandering off in to your bullshit ruminations…

      • She won’t answer anything directly. It will be just more ruminating garbage coming out her ass, as that is all she can offer. Her and her brother Porky (Jason) talk about this subject like a couple of politicians campaigning for a vote or something, just spewing fabricated BS as they go.

      • There was no “plug of corked vomit” with wine beneath. That is a bogus b.s. made up story by you. The vomit was dry and not hard. There was no “plug of hard vomit”. That would be impossible. You are making up another false story to look for any excuse for a “wine claim”.

        You already refuted this new phony theory of yours in a previous post you made from July. It’s easy to see how you make up things as you go along. Hilarious and very pathetic.

        BUSTER says: July 31, 2019
        I spoke to Dr Bannister personally and he told me that Jimi was drowned in at least 5 bottles of wine…He said when he opened Jimi’s mouth to resuscitate him that there was wine up to the throat…A clever detective would see that the amount of wine was wine that was poured in to Jimi until he could hold no more…This is called “overkill” in criminology to make sure the job was done…That same smart detective would realize that for wine to be up to the mouth would mean everything beneath it was flooded and that the volume of that flooding would be about 5 bottles of wine.

        In this post from July you’re claiming that Hendrix was filled to the brim with wine pouring out of his mouth. The ambulance men saw no wine coming out of his mouth at the flat. Also, if he was filled with wine to the brim no hardened plug of vomit could form since the liquid wine flooded inside him would prevent that from happening.

        No articles from 9/18/70 state anything about wine or “hardened plugs of vomit”. No ambulance man said there were “hardened plugs of vomit”. That is not possible to happen anyway.

        Your phony theory is a joke and has has been put to bed.

  143. Either that or there was no wine. The doctors clearly stated they pounded Jimi’s heart but to no avail as Jimi was clearly dead. It was merely a formality on their part. Buster you seem to know a hell of a lot of people connected with this story but no one mentions the copious amounts of red wine only you, Flyswatter and Tappy Wright. The vomit was dry and hard meaning that Jimi had been dead for a while consistent with the ambulance being called hours later. You would think the ambulance officers would have noticed the copious amounts of red wine but it’s funny how that only talk about large amounts of vomit. If Jimi had ingested any of the wine then his blood alcohol level would have been much higher so that could not have been wine being suctioned out of Jimi. Remember that Jimi died in the early hours of the morning therefore the alcohol would have dried up along with the vomit. The ambulance officers surely would have noticed this. The vomit was all the way down therefore they were able to penetrate quite deeply. Any of the doctors would have mentioned the wine as the cause of death in their reports but all that was reported was the vomit and the barbiturate levels. This is consistent with the autopsy report and the actual cause of death. What worries me more out of all of this is your persistence with the murder theory and you reluctance to let go of it even though it has been disproven. You seem to want to sow the seeds of doubt in people’s minds but only the gullible would fall for what you put out there.

  144. Dr Seifert “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor but is was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times but there was no point in doing anything else as he was dead”. No mention of the copious amounts of red wine is there? Jimi died at the Samarkand Hotel, the autopsy report was re-examined as part of Kathy’s investigation. Buster kindly stop re-inventing the story to fit in with your murder theory. You placed your trust in Wright’s story when it was clearly a fraudulent account of what really happened to Jimi that morning. I even doubt that you know any of the authors who you claim to know they would not be associating with a conspiracy theorist. You would not even be in the same league as them. These are serious researchers.

  145. Dr/ Senator Bob Brown was a locum working in the ED the morning Jimi was brought in. He states Jimi was dead and there was nothing they could do. Again no mention of working on Jimi for twenty minutes as claimed by Buster and Flyswatter. As for Dr Seifert the same no mention of working on Jimi for twenty minutes and no witnessing of the copious amounts of red wine. Dr Bannister’s report should be read with caution as he said in an interview that Jimi was an unusually tall man his feet hanging over the hospital trolley by ten inches. Where are you getting your information from Buster, and just who are your sources? Don’t forget to tell me who exactly murdered Jimi Hendrix?

    • There’s another quote out there from Bob Brown that said when he walked in along side Jimi’s gurney that it was obvious Jimi was beyond medical remedy and had suffered some kind of misadventure involving wine…Bob Brown only walked along side the gurney and then handed Jimi off to Siefert and Bannister…You are offering idiotic strawmen Ivana…Brown could not mention the 20 minutes of suctioning if he wasn’t there to witness it…It just shows how dishonest you are and desperate to avoid the wine evidence that you enter that idiotic misrepresentation of the wine while using that inaccurate strawman to avoid answering what I proved in my last post…That’s trolling Ivana…There’s no other name for a person who declares that they are just a bystander in all this but then proceeds to follow such a dishonest course of conduct…

      The wine was witnessed by the time entered on the hospital record…I think Glebbeek showed that hospital record in his ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication…What Mitch wrote was wrong…The hospital record showed that Jimi was treated from 11:45 to 12:15 when they quit off him…He wasn’t declared dead officially until 12:45…The 20 minutes of suctioning is evidenced in that record because if Jimi was dead and had no wine as Ivana trolls, then they wouldn’t have taken a half hour to try and revive a flat-lining dead man…Their equipment cleared the hard vomit plug and opened the throat in short time whereon they then encountered wine that flooded all the way up to the larynx, as was witnessed by the attending doctor, Dr Bannister…There was so much wine in Jimi’s body that it took them 20 minutes to clear it before they could even attempt resuscitation…This was told to me in person by Dr Bannister…A similar account was also written in the letter to Glebbeek…Dr Siefert was obviously gotten to and was lying because the removal of the wine was indirectly evidenced by the time periods captured in the hospital record because they would not spend a half hour on a dead man with no wine flooding his lungs and stomach…But what this piece of shit Ivana is deliberately ignoring is the fact Scotland Yard avoided seeking-out the nurses who could have easily told of this had they been asked…Ivana is also perfectly OK with Scotland Yard never interviewing Dr Bannister…And she also seems to be going out of her way to avoid admitting Dr Siefert was caught saying on video that “Jimi was covered in red wine” and was then later quoted, after Tappy’s book came out and made it dangerous, saying “I detected no alcohol on Jimi”…This obnoxious lying troll Ivana is pretending she is honestly considering the evidence and playing devil’s advocate but anyone with learned experience in this matter will see she is dedicatedly looking to deny the murder evidence at all costs while asking people to think she is sincere…Ivana straight dodged my point that you won’t be able to find any real drug/alcohol choking on vomit death where the victim had profuse vomit, 5 bottles of wine flooding their stomach and lungs, and only a 5mg blood alcohol content…The profuse vomit is not normally seen in such deaths…They usually end with the victim gurgling some vomit in their throat that gets breathed in to the lungs…The reason Jimi had so much vomit was because of an action-reaction event from having so much wine poured in to his body…Wine is thicker than water and would also be more likely to collapse a lung after engorging it and being suctioned out…

      You shouldn’t be allowed to do this Ivana…You are ignoring evidence and making regressive dishonest responses based on faulty information that has already been disproved by what you are ignoring…I can’t think of anything more evil or low than trolling Jimi’s murder…

      • There was no 5 bottles of wine in Hendrix and there was no suctioning of wine. There is no official record of this ever happening on 9/18/70.

        More conspiracy b.s. coming from you with your own made up spin of events with bogus claims of this person was “gotten to” No proof of this and only made up stuff by you.

        Buster is upset that his phony theory is exposed as a fraud.

  146. Are you serious Buster Jimi was dead when the ambulance men arrived at the Samarkand Hotel, and both Dr Seifert and Dr Brown both state that Jimi was dead when he arrived at the ED there was no suctioning done at the hospital this was performed by the ambulance officers at the hotel. Dr Bannister is the only one to talk about the copious amounts of red wine. Dr Crompton states that the level of Quinalbarbitone in the blood should not be above 0.5mgs/100ml at the very most. Therefore the amount in Jimi’s blood, found in the post-mortem to be 0.7mgs/100ml, was a toxic level. This seriously inhibited Jimi’s coughing reflex. Dr Seifert pounded Jimi’s heart as a mere formality as he was flat-lined/dead. Your scenario Buster implies that Jimi was unconscious when brought in and this warranted the half hour resuscitation attempt. You are forgetting that Jimi had been dead quite a while before the ambulance was called. This is revealed in the autopsy by the ingestion of the rice Jimi ate at the party. Buster you are re-writing the record here and in my mind you are tampering with the established evidence. Let’s not forget that the amount Jimi had taken of the Vesparax was many times the stated dosage of only half a tablet. As for the Scotland Yard investigation it is obvious that they did not need to seek out the nurses; this is just setting the cat among the pigeons. I would stop this nonsense if I were you Buster it has all been done and dusted. No amount of name calling will make you look any more credible it makes you look desperate.

  147. I have just finished talking to a neighbour who is a doctor about Jimi. He said that the ambulance officers both acted appropriately in their care of Jimi as it is there duty to keep trying to help a patient. If a patient is DOA at the hospital the doctors would then assess whether it is appropriate to continue helping that patient. The pounding of Jimi’s chest was done only in order to establish a time of death as Jimi was beyond help. The patient is then placed in the coroner’s care in order to determine cause of death.

  148. Justin: Could you help us here?…There is a required level of basic honest discussion and recognition of facts that Ivana is deliberately defying here and offering ridiculous claims that violate some of the basic proven facts of the case…This site has been a good place to discuss the facts behind Jimi’s death in an intelligent and reasonable manner, however Ivana has decided to come in and oppose most of the basic facts of the case in what is now turning out to be a totally uncredible and silly way that destroys the previous decorum of this room…I agree with free speech and usually try to extend it to even my worst enemies on principle, however there is a point where extension of free speech to persons who offer no honest input and only intend to vandalize what has been established by reasonable means becomes foolish and works against the overall purpose of the board…I think Ivana has crossed that line…If you look at her input she is ignoring cited references and re-entering provably false claims…Kathy Etchingham’s investigation obtained a quote from the ambulance men saying their suction device that they used was not adequate to penetrate the hardened plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat and because of that they decided to get Jimi to the hospital in order to access equipment that could…Also, Kathy got one of the cops to say they pretty much bundled Jimi up and transported him to the hospital…The ambulance is on record as being called at 11:18 and having left the Samarkand around 11:30…

    Justin: Ivana’s ignoring of the valid citation of Kathy’s investigation and just repeating another chanting of her denial rhetoric is grounds to cite her as an unserious troll who is not here to discuss the evidence rationally or logically but is here instead to vandalize the site and the thread…I mean free speech is one thing but at some point you have to judge input and intent and I think we are well past the point of determining that Ivana is not here for honest purposes and is not making any honest effort to understand the facts we are explaining to her or how they affect the evidence…

    Another example is her quote on the Vesparax…The true context of that quote is that Dr Crompton was gotten to after he correctly cited that the undigested rice in Jimi’s stomach precluded any time of death after 5:30am…This was a damning witnessing so pressure was put on Crompton and he was later quoted as saying he made that determination based on out-dated forensic science…The problem with that retraction is there is no out-dating of a basic determination of the digestive quality of rice…You couldn’t cite a valid scientific “out-dating” of the forensic science of determining the digestive state of rice…Crompton was lying and somebody had put pressure on him to retract…

    Crompton’s analysis of the Quinalbarbitone (American “Secobarbital”) doesn’t include the basic fact that the product manufacturer stated in their product information that lethal dose threshold was “9 to 10 tablets”…Ivana is trying to tell us that a .5mg blood barbiturate level is the lethal dose threshold but that is not correct as shown by the product manufacturer’s information I just cited…I know this case through and through and the quote Ivana cited was gotten from Crompton after he had been forced to retract…The correct information is that Jimi took 9 tablets while having an infamous tolerance for barbiturates…He was nowhere close to lethal dose as the doctors Monika hired correctly determined…

    Furthermore, Ivana is ignorant of the fact the correct time of death at 5:30am means Jimi only had the pills in him for 2 hours maximum…According to that same manufacturer’s product information, the Vesparax level found in Jimi’s blood could have been reached in as little as an hour…What Ivana is not credibly, scientifically accounting for is that the 5:30am time of death she admits proves the Vesparax could not have killed Jimi…Caesar Glebbeek managed to access the Underwriter Laboratories case histories for Vesparax overdoses and he found that persons who took 10 to 15 pills never died in less than 4 hours…Ivana is insisting that Jimi died a perfectly understandable overdose death from the Vesparax but she has ignored several times now the science that proves otherwise…Jimi only took a borderline lethal dose of 9 pills…That lethal dose threshold is determined for persons with no tolerance…Jimi had an infamous tolerance which means the 9 pills he took would not have killed him, and especially not have killed him in only 1 to 2 hours…Therefore the reason Jimi died was because of the 5 bottles of wine Dr Bannister removed from Jimi’s stomach and lungs at St Mary’s…It drowned him when he was 1 to 2 hours in to a dangerous dose of Vesparax, but one that would not have killed him…This is proven by the 5mg blood alcohol content and is forensic proof of homicide…The British government has acted criminally in avoiding any honest pursuit of this correct evidence…And so has Ivana who is obviously doing her best to ignore this valid proof…

    • Buster is trying to silence people’s voices who proves his phony theory to be wrong. Shameful that you want to take away a person’s Freedom of Speech that shows you to be inept.

  149. Justin I will save you the trouble. What Buster is insinuating here is that the doctors changed their story after they were warned. This is absolute nonsense and shows clearly that Buster is making it up as he goes along. He will do anything to add to his murder theory. Anyone with any sense will see Buster’s post for what they really are-pure fantasy. The folks at Crosstown Torrents and Electric Guru I think understood this and had him banned from their sites. I go by the coroner’s report pure and simple. That is the truth of the matter. I will no longer be posting as I do not want to give Buster any more opportunities to further his murder claims.

    • Ivana offers nothing but a skeptical view that is designed to ignore or deny all the facts we discuss and simply come to the conclusion the official story was right and Jimi died from an accidental death no matter what she is shown…Ivana is ignorant that Dr Crompton was involved in a controversial ruling involving Petar Sutovic, a Serbian youth who was murdered for body parts…Crompton called it a morphine overdose because of political pressure…So he has a record of making himself available to political rulings…Ivana thinks that she is above evidence and can answer fact with rhetoric…As I said before, Crompton showed evidence of changing his story under pressure…There is no out-dating of the forensic science in determining the digestive quality of a grain of rice and neither Crompton or Ivana answered that…Crompton was obviously under pressure to change his 5:30am time of death…He claimed that he used antiquated methods to determine the digestive state of the rice, but the problem is there was no antiquation of that process and it is done the same now as it was then…It is a simple visual observation…

      Ivana has yet to show any recognition that we have proof Dr Siefert changed his story…He is on video tape from the 1990’s where he says “Jimi was covered in red wine”…After Tappy’s book came out Glebbeek got a quote from him saying “I detected no alcohol on Jimi”…So while Ivana pretends to be a harsh critic of claims and demands proof for everything she shows no interest in Siefert being caught red-handed telling two opposite stories for the same event or its implications…There’s no jury in the world that would look at that and not come to the conclusion that Siefert lied in order to cover-up something dangerous…Ivana is outraged and insisting I am trying to get away with crazy fantasy but so far she’s done her best to avoid recognizing that all this is already proven and is part of the official record…Only a fool would not realize Siefert lied because he knew of the danger of what he witnessed and therefore what really happened…

      Dr Thurston told that to Jack Meehan no matter how much the two obvious denial trolls Ivana and Jason want to deny it…Ivana thinks I am outrageously loose with my claims and beyond the pale but she ignores in public that the Chief Coroner in the case gave witness to the large amount of wine in Jimi’s stomach and then failed to follow-through as the serious legal/medical ethics and laws he was beholden to required…Ivana asks us to allow her to interpret it backwards and say it proves it never happened and there was no red wine…However she ignores the fact we have several other instances of unaccountable avoidance of serious evidence and simple investigative follow-through glaring out in the case…This goes all the way back to the Inquest that never involved Thurston’s large amount of wine in the stomach; or called any of the medical witnesses; that accepted Monika’s crock of shit without question and used it to determine the forensics; and never even determined a time of death…

      Beyond this we have Kathy exposing Monika’s story to be nothing but complete lies and proving that the time of death was off by 6 hours, and Dr Bannister coming forward to say there was highly suspicious medical evidence of Jimi being drowned in wine…Scotland Yard’s reaction was to lie and make excuses around it…They lied about there being no new evidence when in fact there was serious new evidence and they failed to interview Dr Bannister…They failed to seek out the nurses who would have witnessed the wine and when Tappy came out with his claim they showed no interest and didn’t even interview him…So while Ivana claims I am making wild and crazy accusations she ignores that we have a full mortared brick wall of confirming facts that show exactly that – that the British government was directly hands-on involved in actively covering this up and guiding the investigation around the evidence…Never has so much obvious evidence been so obscenely denied…

      As to Crosstown Torrents and Electric Guru the individuals involved in banning me didn’t even get as far as reading my case…They simply said they were not going to allow the topic period and when I protested that was a violation of Jimi I got banned…On Crosstown it was done by a British moderator with an obvious national agenda…On Guru by an expat American woman who worked in London and obviously didn’t want any compromises affecting her career…Of course Ivana instantly credits clueless idiots and their depraved disinterest…

      Ivana is dishonestly hiding behind the coroner’s report, but she’s ignoring that it is useless because it did not consider the real time of death or the wine that was witnessed drowning Jimi…Ivana ignores that Jeffery was Military Intelligence which is also MI-6…Once you cross in to that magic land of intrigue the rest makes perfect sense for those who think beyond the official story and are able to detect the fingerprints of its methods…Her input is too simple to take seriously and shows willful disregard for the most intelligent evidence…

      • it’s very clear that Buster the clown only wants to argue his phony conspiracy theory and ignore the facts from 9/18/70. There was nothing documented or spoken about wine on 9/18/70. Not from any ambulance man, police man, doctor, coroner, or pathologist. The false claims of wine came from Bannister himself in 1992 and that’s what Buster wants to argue.

        Buster’s only defense is to attack Teare claiming he forged the autopsy numbers. His only other defense is to attack Crompton and whoever else disputes his garbage with actual scientific facts.

        He also claims all these people were “gotten to” who refutes his nonsense. They very definition of a conspiracy theorist and why people who read his posts laugh and shake their heads.

      • Sorry Buster, “Thurston never told Meehan” anything. That was a fake second hand quote from Sharon Lawrence in her fake book. I’ve already debunked that in detail with Part 3 on the way. Don’t know why you feel the need to use fake “evidence” repeating false claims for your failed debate.

  150. Pop Star Jimi Hendrix Dies
    September 18, 1970
    London (AP) Jimi Hendrix, the American Pop singer died today in London.

    Hendrix, 27, was reported dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital in the Kensington area of London this morning.

    Police sources say that Hendrix died of an apparent drug overdose and that no foul play was involved.

    British blues singer and close friend of Hendrix, Eric Burdon said “All I know is that he had taken some sleeping tablets.”

    A coroner’s officer took possession of the sleeping tablets where Hendrix was staying with a girlfriend instead of the Cumberland Hotel where he was registered.

    Doctors at St. Mary Abbots Hospital stated that an overdose of drugs was the apparent cause of death.

    A hospital spokesman issued the following official statement regarding the death of Hendrix. “We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”

    His body was taken from the hospital to a southwest London morgue for an autopsy after he was pronounced dead. The official cause of death will not be determined until a post mortem.

    Hendrix was arrested last year in Toronto, Canada for possession of hashish and heroin, but was acquitted. During the trial he said he used marijuana, hashish, LSD and cocaine but never heroin. His most popular song, Purple Haze, was descriptive of drug culture.

    • Here’s an article on Hendrix’s death from 9/18/70.

      The article states that Hendrix was dead on arrival. The police saw no wine on the scene and said it was an apparent drug overdose. The police took the other pills as evidence. If there was all this massive wine the police would have stated that. The police confirmed no foul play. There goes the phony wine theory.

      Check this out….the doctors at the hospital “stated an overdose of drugs was the apparent cause of death.” The doctors were Bannister, Siefert, Brown. All 3 of them that day said nothing about “wine” as a cause of death. They only stated drugs. If there was all this wine from Hendrix, Bannister would have stated wine and not drugs. Nothing about wine at all on 9/18/70. There goes the phony wine theory.

      The hospital spokesman said it was drugs and not wine. There goes the phony wine theory.

      Here’s another one….”His body was taken from the hospital to a southwest London morgue for an autopsy after he was pronounced dead.”…..this means that Bannister’s phony claims of suctioning wine out of Hendrix for hours is fraudulent. Hendrix was taken to the morgue after he was pronounced dead, There goes the phony wine claim.

      This old article clearly refutes the phony wine claims made up by Bannister in 1992 and the b.s. conspiracy theories that Buster is promoting. No wine talked about at all. Only drugs. If there was wine the police and ALL the doctors would’ve said it was wine on 9/18/70.

      This phony wine theory can now be put to bed.

      • Incredibly well researched Jason. I stated I would not post again but I had to congratulate you on your work to further recognise Buster for what he truly is a fantasist. What Buster does not say about Dr Crompton is that he was the pathologist who worked on the Markov case the murder of the Bulgarian broadcaster who was able to detect the highly poisonous ricin. And where did he get the ridiculous suggestion that this highly respected and experienced pathologist would need to change his story. Just what or whom would he be protecting? You would think Dr Crompton would be able to know the difference between barbiturate intoxication and drowning by wine. Buster has changed the narrative in order to protect his waterboarding theory. It all just sounds false and phoney-a gigantic lie.

      • Thanks Ivana!

        I said a few weeks ago if you research real Hendrix information these conspiracy theories will be easily debunked.

        Well, according to Buster he claims every highly respected coroner or pathologist has been “gotten to” and has changed their findings. LOL. That’s his only defense to keep his conspiracy going. It’s very pathetic. Buster also changes his stories when it suits him. He has 4 fraud sources and fake quotes as his “evidence” but they all have been debunked. It seems to me he isn’t interested in learning about real evidence. He just wants to debate his phony theory using whatever nonsense he can think up in order to “win”. Real evidence refutes his nonsense no matter how hard he tries.

        I saw those posts you told me about on the “crosstown” site and it looks just like Buster’s long winded rants on here. Same conspiracy junk with no proof or evidence. All theories and after the fact phony scenarios.

        The main point in that 1970 article is there is nothing wine related at all. It only talks about drugs being the cause of death, which it was. And that was even before the autopsy was performed. The police, doctors, hospital spokesman all said drugs. Bannister, Brown, Siefert all said drugs in 1970 in that article. All this wine b.s. came in 1992 when Bannister started it. Then all those frauds wrote books adding to the conspiracy after.

        I thought your posts were very insightful. I’m still going to post part 3 when i get a chance and do a couple of more including one about Jeffery. So check back in.

  151. (Welcome back again, as the final Part 3 of the “imbibed wine” myth is exposed as the total fraud that it is. To recap what you’ve read, we have Sharon Lawrence who made up the phony “imbibed wine” story for her book. She was clearly shown to be the fraud and the liar that she is. She expects us to believe that she would find out important information from a colleague regarding the death of Hendrix and not bother to report it until it “popped back into her head” for her fantasy book 31 years later. She also expects us to believe that UPI reporter Jack Meehan would refuse to do his job by reporting a major story he found out from a top coroner and only tell her in a passing moment. She also expects us to believe that a top coroner Dr. Gavin Thurston would refuse to perform his duty of documenting the major cause of death regarding Hendrix in his final autopsy report but only tell Meehan on the sly and nobody else. Sorry, we are not stupid and can see a phony claim like this from a mile away. Sharon Lawrence’s “imbibed wine” story is more phony than a 3 dollar bill. The fact is that there was never any “imbibed wine” in He