My Italian and I recently visited the Handel House Museum in London. The Handel House Museum is the 18th century house where the famous composer George Frideric Handel lived for 36 years until his death in 1759. Later, however, the Handel House was home to another musical legend – the great Jimi Hendrix… In 1968 Jimi Hendrix moved into the top floor flat of 23 Brook Street with his English girlfriend Kathy Etchingham (Jimi’s old flat is now the administrative offices for the Handel House Museum).
Below are two images of Jimi Hendrix at 23 Brook Street:
At 23 Brook Street with Kathy Etchingham:
****
While we were exploring the Handel House Museum I overheard another visitor talking about Jimi Hendrix and the idea that he had been murdered. I’d never heard this before and was skeptical. However, the murder theorist also mentioned an article in the Times of London which did pique my interest.
Below is the piece in the Times of London by Dominic Wells… I don’t know how credible it is, but it is interesting.
Was Jimi Hendrix murdered?
“Michael Jackson’s untimely death will fuel biographies, album rereleases and conspiracy theories for years. But rewind nearly four decades and there’s another death, one that bears many similarities to Jackson’s, about which startling revelations are still coming to light.
Jimi Hendrix was also a black artist who crossed over to a white audience. He did for the guitar what Jackson did for the pop video, combining showmanship — playing the guitar with his teeth, behind his back, then setting it on fire — with a musicianship so peerless that on hearing him Eric Clapton considered packing it in.
And Hendrix, too, was afflicted by a fame that came too fast, too heavy; by the money-lubricated machinery of management; and by the drugs that helped him to cope. But there is one key difference.
James “Tappy” Wright, a former road manager, has come forward with an extraordinary claim about rock’s most gifted guitarist. At first it sounds absurd. But as the 65-year-old granddad lays out his tale while pouring a very un-rock’n’roll cup of tea, you begin to realise that there could be something to it.
In direct contrast to the violence and seeming anarchy of his music, Hendrix was a gentle, peaceful man
Hendrix, according to Wright, did not die accidentally in the early hours of September 18, 1970, from choking on his own vomit after a drugs overdose. Instead he was murdered by a ruthless gang who burst into the London hotel room of his girlfriend, Monika Dannemann, and forced sleeping pills and wine down his throat until he drowned. A horrific end, if true. But there’s more.
Wright says he knows the killers’ leader, in fact worked for him. It was the man whom Hendrix should have been able to trust above all others: his own manager, Mike Jeffery. Is that possible?
“Mike Jeffery was a dangerous man, no doubt about it,” says Wright, with a Whitley Bay “oo” in “no doot aboot it”. “He spent two years in the Army, in the Secret Service [it is known that Jeffery spoke Russian and was stationed in Egypt]. Shooting people was fun, he used to say to me, just like shooting ducks at the fairground. He’d have to creep into people’s tents with fixed bayonets, this was in the Suez days or whatever. The noise was horrible, he said: you could hear the metal scraping against the bones of their ribcage.”
In his memoir, Rock Roadie, published last week, Wright says that Jeffery confessed to the murder over a bottle of bourbon in 1973. The story has spread like wildfire on the internet, but until now no one has had the chance to quiz Wright in person. Why did he wait 36 years to tell the tale?
“I was scared,” he says simply. The man who once bedded 70 groupies in a month is potbellied now, with diabetes and dodgy knees, but Wright never drank or took drugs; his memory of the Sixties seems sharp. “Mike Jeffery was not a man you wanted to cross . . . I was scared of him. The day after he told me, I came in dead nervous, like, in case he’d had second thoughts. It was never mentioned again.”
Jeffery died in a mid-air plane collision a month later. Why did Wright not come forward then? Or, in 1993, why did he not give evidence when Hendrix’s former girlfriend, Kathy Etchingham, asked police to re-investigate his death?
“They never asked,” Wright says. “The other men who helped Mike Jeffery kill Hendrix, they would have still been alive. And I was worried that the fact that I hadn’t come forward in the first place made me a — what do you call it? — an accessory. In the end, it was Rod Weinberg [a music impresario who co-wrote the memoir] who persuaded me I had a duty to come clean.”
Bob Levine, now in his eighties and living in Florida, is one of the few key players still alive. As the merchandising manager he worked closely with Jeffery, but even he had to take him to court to retrieve £30,000 lent to save Jeffery from a Mob enforcer.
Levine has sent Wright a letter. “I’m so glad you honoured the truth,” he wrote, “instead of all that regurgitated shit that comes out.”
The Sixties were Wild West times in the music industry. While the rock stars got high, their managers got rich. Wright’s book is more concerned with his own sexploits with groupies, but when pressed, he will recount how Jeffery got him to fly from New York to France, Germany, London and then back, picking up parcels along the way. “I knew it was money. From shady individuals, yes. Sometimes royalty cheques, but they were all made out to Yameta, the offshore account Mike Jeffery set up in the Bahamas.”
The Animals, whom Mike Jeffery managed before Hendrix, were once the UK’s biggest act after the Beatles. They split up in 1966 with just £500 to their name. Their lead singer, Eric Burdon, described that Bahamas account as a “Bermuda Triangle” for their money. Hendrix found the same.
“Mike Jeffery told them that Yameta would be a tax haven for all their money,” says Wright. “But no one got any of it. Jimi died a pauper. The Animals didn’t have a pot to piss in.”
Jeffery may have been more unscrupulous than most, but in any business that runs on cash, the Mob is never far behind. Tours in the US had to contend with Mafia control of trucking, baggage handling and stadium concessions. Managers had to be tough nuts to protect their clients. Jeffery was a short man, not given to overt violence. Yet in his dark glasses and overcoat he exuded menace. He flaunted his connections with organised crime and the FBI.
But murdering your own star act? Perhaps Jeffery was capable of the deed, but what could the motive possibly be? This is where it gets interesting.
Jeffery had crippling debts. There were huge expenses from building Hendrix’s Electric Lady studio in New York, including a $400,000 loan from Warners; Hendrix’s first manager had won a court case granting him the next album and a share of all profits; he owed $200,000 in back taxes; and he had recently paid £100,000 to buy out Hendrix’s co-manager Chas Chandler (Chandler, reveals Wright for the first time, was livid with Hendrix for bedding his wife).
Yet Hendrix’s contract with Jeffery was coming up for renewal. The two men had clashed over not just money but musical direction, too. In 1967 Jeffery had disastrously booked Hendrix as support to the Monkees; the year after that he tried to dissuade Hendrix from recording a double album (Electric Ladyland); and in 1969 he tried to make Hendrix go back to using white musicians in his band. According to several sources during his final weeks in London, Hendrix was determined to change management.
Jeffery would have been desperate. He couldn’t afford to lose his cash cow. But according to Wright, Jeffery had one last get-out-of-jail-free card. Jeffery had taken out a $2 million insurance policy on Hendrix’s life. That was standard practice for a manager, but right now it meant Hendrix was worth more to Jeffery dead than alive.
It wouldn’t have taken much imagination to come to this conclusion, either. As a young man Jeffery had profited from two mysteriously well-timed fires, one at a nightclub and another at a coffee bar he owned in Newcastle. The insurance payments allowed him to set up management of the Animals and open the Club A-Go- Go for them to play in.
After Hendrix’s death, Jeffery was able to pay off his back taxes, buy out Hendrix’s father’s share in the Electric Lady studios, and buy himself a house in Woodstock. And of course he continued to cash in on his client’s legacy. In 1973 he even sent a virtual Hendrix out on tour — showing a film of Hendrix in concert, with support acts appearing beforehand.
So Jeffery had motive and ability. Had he the opportunity? No one knows where Jeffery was that night. Days later, he was tracked down to Majorca, where he had a nightclub. He expressed surprise, claiming not even to have heard of Hendrix’s death.
As to the sequence of events that led up to Hendrix’s death, accounts are famously conflicting. The authority is Tony Brown, whose exhaustive book The Final Days of Jimi Hendrix, came out in 1997. The ambulancemen and police who found Hendrix are interviewed. All concur that they found the door to the flat open, which suggests a hasty exit. Hendrix was fully clothed, which doesn’t sound as if he deliberately took pills to sleep. And he was “covered in vomit, tons of it over the pillow, black and brown it was”.
The doctor who examined Hendrix discovered copious amounts of wine in Hendrix’s lungs, but strangely little had had time to be absorbed into his bloodstream — a powerful indication of foul play. Dr John Bannister told The Times in 1993 that by the time his body reached the hospital, “Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes.”
The version of events presented by Dannemann had been accepted by biographers as fact for 20 years. It is now universally discredited. A German figure-skater turned drug-taker and fantasist, she was with Hendrix the night he died. She claimed that he fell unconscious when she popped out for cigarettes, that he was alive when the ambulance arrived, that it was their blunders that led to his death. This is denied in every detail by all the authorities involved.
It is known, however, that she argued violently with Hendrix before he died; and it was her sleeping pills that found their way into Hendrix’s system. After his death she became reclusive and litigious. Was she involved in the death? Did Jeffery somehow get her out of the way? Or was it she who gave Hendrix nine of the extra-strength tablets? She committed suicide in 1996, so we will never know.
Wright doesn’t claim to have all the answers — in fact very little of the story pieced together above can be found in Rock Roadie. His ripping yarn of groupies, celebrity encounters and touring devotes just five pages to Hendrix’s death. He knew the man, of course. He was there when Hendrix burnt his guitar at Monterey; he went shopping with him for women’s clothes to brighten up his look. But he’s no historian.
So The Times contacted other experts who might shed some light. Roger Pomphrey made a documentary in 1997 about Hendrix’s Electric Ladyland album. A former musician, he interviewed all the key players still aliveand immersed himself in the Hendrix literature.
“If I thought there wasn’t some credibility to this story I wouldn’t begin to associate with it,” Pomphrey says. He will be moderating a series of public Q&A sessions with Wright at the Edinburgh Festival. “We all know that the whole world loves a conspiracy. What separates Hendrix’s death is that from the word go it was incredibly murky. Monika Dannemann’s story changed by the hour. When I made my documentary there were a couple of people who claimed, offcamera, that Monika was in New York two weeks after Jimi died, and who heard her in close conversation with Mike Jeffery.
“That said, of course I’m expecting a total backlash, people saying why have you waited so long to come out. Having got to know Tappy over the last few months, I suspect he’s an honest man.”
Joe Boyd made one of the first Hendrix documentaries, back in 1973. Asked about Wright’s revelation, he says, categorically, “I think it’s absurd.” He knew Jeffery a bit, having dated his secretary. There was a “sinister aspect” to the man, Boyd says, and he “certainly wasn’t the best manager in the world”, but he was intelligent and good to talk to; Boyd can’t believe murder. But then Boyd hadn’t read up on any of the medical revelations from the Nineties; after hearing the whole tale, he began to wonder if there was something to it.
Next, the Hendrix obsessive Yazid Manou, who befriended Dannemann. Initially, he had assumed that Wright was simply a desperate figure with a book to promote. On more considered reflection, he feels that “all the elements of [Wright’s] story could be true, but it’s difficult to check”. And he put us on to a vital witness.
Alan Douglas was Hendrix’s friend and producer during the Electric Lady sessions, and masterminded posthumous releases for 20-odd years. Numerous biographies state that Douglas was the man Hendrix wanted as his new manager.
“Absolutely not true,” Douglas says. Though in his late seventies, he’s still sharp. “I’m not a manager. We never once talked about it. I thought there wasn’t any problem between me and Mike Jeffery but obviously there was, because I kept hearing from people that Mike was worried I was going to steal Jimi.” Confronted about this later, “Tappy” Wright sticks to his story. “I just heard Mike Jeffery’s side of it, but I know what he said to me. Maybe he heard the wrong thing, maybe there’s more than what Alan Douglas is saying.”
Douglas cannot believe Jeffery had anything to do with the death. But he reveals a fascinating conversation with Jeffery a few days after Hendrix died. “Mike was bent double, his head at waist level, in terrible condition with his back. He was feeling a lot of guilt, and told me he wasn’t in retrospect treating Jimi the way he should, under pressure from all the loans. One thing he said to me I don’t think I’ve told anybody, but it’s something I’ll never forget: ‘Every time I was with a woman I thought I could love, I found she was only with me to get to Jimi’.”
So who do we believe? Who, after all this time, can reconstruct events with any certainty? It does not help Wright that his book is ghostwritten: dialogue does not ring true, and there is the odd detail — an “I Love New York” mug, when the slogan wasn’t invented until 1977, for instance — that Wright will admit was made up for colour. But it would be a bizarre fantasist who would fabricate such an appalling story, about people he was close to, just to sell a book.
This much we do know. The medical evidence is at least consistent with Hendrix having been murdered. Jeffery had ability and opportunity. He behaved oddly after the death. And if we believe, as many have attested, that Hendrix wanted to change management, then he also had motive.
Hendrix’s passing marked the end of the Sixties. His stupid, avoidable death from drugs — along with fellow 27-year-olds Brian Jones, Janis Joplin and Jim Morrison — was long held as an indictment of the age, the ultimate discrediting of the pursuit of personal liberty over social conformity.
But instead, you may now choose to rewrite your paradigm of the Sixties like this: the Flower Generation’s rarest bloom was trampled by a ruthless, moneygrabbing, ex-army businessman who wore shades and took drugs, but never understood what Hendrix’s music was about.
Either way, what Hendrix’s death amply demonstrates, as Michael Jackson’s death will continue to do for the next 40 years, is the public’s boundless fascination with their too-mortal gods, and the music industry’s unerring ability to turn martyrdom into money.”
The Velvet Rocket 
It does sound strange that the wine had not had time to be absorbed into Hendrix’s bloodstream but was found in his lungs. This suggests the wine was ingested very quickly – it’s easy to binge drink, say, lager, but who binge drinks red wine that rapidly? Possibly, it was forced on him. Intriguing.
RE-OPEN INVESTIGATION on Hendrix death. Start with BOB Levine. Jealous people exist today in cities in Orange County, CA. Several people feed off Cheryl Sweet, Anne Coyne, Daniel Lauver, Mary R. Delia, Theresa Anastasi and associates jealousy. The bible says; ” Where their is envy and jealousy, their is all sorts of evil,”
What’s strange is that people would peddle a Jimi Hendrix hoax and make up blatant lies about phony wine that never existed. You’re guilty of making false statements Robert. There was never any wine ever documented.
There was never any wine found in Hendrix’s lungs. There are no documents of wine from St. Mary Abbots Hospital. There was no wine found anywhere during the autopsy. No evidence of a phony “forced wine drowning”. No wine was ever witnessed at the death scene. So, your phony accusations of wine is false.
Fraud Bannister, the 3 count convicted fraud doctor made up the fake wine claim in 1992 cuz he thought he was going to be sued for medical malpractice after he read the book Electric Gypsy. Nothing about wine was ever spoken before then. After his fake wine claim, all the hoaxers started coming out to make their own fake claims of wine like Tappy “the fraud” Wright who admitted he lied making up that ridiculous and phony Michael Jefferey “murder confession” to sell his crappy book. Michael Jeffery was in Spain and Bob Levine proved Wright to be nothing but a fraud and a hoaxer.
All the forensic analysis of Jimi’s body proved he died of a lethal 0.7mg drug overdose of 9 Vesparax pills along with a powerful amphetamine and wine he drank on his own. Jimi was over the legal alcohol limit and that interacted with the barbiturates he overdosed on.
Next time Robert, do some research and learn the facts before you peddle gossip and false claims that have no factual evidence that can ever be proven.
Speculations about suicide and murder are too ridiculous to contemplate – most of them are probably concocted in order to dramatise and distract from the awful reality of such a genius dying in this way – but what does matter are Kathy Etchingham’s reflections. “Jimi died because the simple things got complicated. He was born to a father who was an alcoholic and a mother who died and he died because he was in that flat in Notting Hill with a complete stranger who gave him a load of sleeping pills without telling him how strong they were. It’s as simple and as complicated as that.
Have your say! I don’t know if Jimi Hendrix was murdered or not. Was Jimi Hendrix murdered? With Jimi, I hope the legacy will always be the music for this once in a life time artists because he advocated peace.
Jesus. Were you guys just poised and waiting for me to publish this post on Jimi Hendrix? Haha. You all pounced on it as soon as I put it up.
Jimi Hendrix was most likely killed by a CIA/COINTELPRO political assassination operation. If you follow the money, Jeffery kept the money he stole from Jimi in some offshore Bahamian banks that CIA also kept some very sensitive funds in. Read Michael Collins Piper’s book ‘Final Judgment’ to understand the connection between the CIA and mob in those banks and how they were used to channel mob proceeds into CIA black ops bank accounts. CIA had a deal with organized crime that if they helped control communism CIA would look the other way. CIA then took a cut which ended up in those same Bahamian offshore banks that Jeffery kept Hendrix’s stolen money in.
I openly suspect Michael Jeffery was recruited straight out of MI-5 in order to participate in the British branch of this program. He ripped-off the Animals, before he ever heard of Hendrix, through the same banks. I suspect Jeffery was the go-between for this program and was tapping unsuspecting rock acts as a funding source for this CIA black ops program. That explains why Jeffery had no problem taking those acts over from the mob.
Jimi was murdered while he was in the process of sending his lawyers to investigate those Bahamian bank accounts. They were literally CIA’s most sensitive bank accounts and were their main funding source for their worst black operations. CIA used offshore accounts in order to prevent having to explain what they did with the money or where they got it from. Those monies could then be used to fund some very wicked anti-communist operations. CIA was not interested in having lawyers snooping around those banks. Jimi was murdered by classic CIA alcoholic waterboarding in combination with barbiturates shortly after he initiated a tracing of his money. The main Bahamian BCCI Bank was shut down a decade later when it was determined it was mostly a dirty money laundry. Wikipedia BCCI Bank if you don’t believe me.
Jeffery told Tappy Wright “I had to do it, I had no choice”. You bet your ass.
Interesting that two months after confessing to Wright Jeffery was called to Majorca to help fix an electrical problem at his nightclub. On the flight back to Britain his Iberia Airlines DC-9 collided with another commercial aircraft and crashed. All 68 on board were killed. It is my suggestion that after killing Hendrix by covert means giving Jeffery a heart attack or some other covert death would be too obvious. No one, however, would question a mid-air plane collision.
While Jeffery was drawn to Majorca French Air Traffic Controllers went on strike. They were then replaced with military controllers less familiar with the operation. It was during this time that Jeffery’s flight crashed. It is my direct suggestion that intel were the only ones capable of creating the nightclub electrical problem pretext, as well as getting the air traffic controllers to strike, and also steering two jets towards each other. If Jeffery died there would be no one to publicly connect him to those CIA banks or investigate his background once it was established the money was unaccountably gone. Perhaps this is why Jeffery confessed?
Jeffery’s charred and mangled body was identified by a Hendrix road crew member – either Stickells or Barret, I can’t recall. He identified Jeffery through his unique jewelry. And although he never saw the remains themselves they were photographed.
I’d also check out Monika Dannemann’s background because it is very possible she was used as an intel infiltrator. I suspect the super-strong sleeping tablets that ended up in Hendrix’s reach the night he died were swung in there by a subtle CIA black operation. And, ironically, very possibly one Jimi may have inadvertently funded himself.
This is all tin foil hat made up stuff. Buster only can use the words “I suspect” cuz there is no evidence to support any of this.
Jimi Hendrix was not murdered and Michael Jeffery was not a member of British Intelligence. Jeffery’s highest rank in the Army was private. Another fabricated claim used by conspiracy theorists for their phony murder theory.
Michael Jeffery never told Tappy Wright that he murdered Hendrix. Tappy Wright lied about this claim for a “hook” to sell his useless Rock Roadie book. Tappy Wright later admitted he lied about his claim.
The rest of this junk post is pure fairy tales made up by Buster.
The CIA doesn’t murder people by “classic CIA water boarding” using alcohol and barbiturates. Ridiculous tin foil hat stuff. Buster has no clue what he’s talking about.
Waterboarding is a method used to simulate drowning in order to get a person to talk giving up important information. Waterboarding is not a method used for murder. Buster should understand what waterboarding is before he posts inaccurate information. This stuff is hilarious.
You are clueless. Hendrix was murdered anyone when any common sense can figure that out!!
Ok Bob, then show some evidence that Hendrix was murdered. You are making that claim, so show me some documented evidence that proves your claim.
I’d like to add to Tim Haywards that the denial of the screaming evidence for murder in Hendrix’s case is a typical example of people wanting to believe their government doesn’t operate like an evil machiavellian cult and that all the obvious evidence like Monika Dannemann being caught in outrageous lies about that morning, or Michael Jeffery’s visible in plain daylight MI-5/mafia background and motives, or the forensic evidence, all don’t point towards murder. It’s pretty ridiculous to think the classic government psy-ops propaganda that people want to believe something greater must be involved would cover all the normally obvious intrigue involved in Hendrix’s death. That intrigue is easily shown and available in deep detail if one makes even the most simple effort to look into it – which Tim grants himself the privilege of not doing.
When Jimi died a forensic clock started ticking. That clock froze a 3.9mg blood level of barbiturate in Jimi’s blood. It also froze a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content into place for the autopsy to register. The autopsist, Dr Teare, also found undigested rice remnants in Jimi’s stomach. These three items create a forensic “triangulation” that can’t be fudged or distorted.
We know Jimi got back to the Samarkand Hotel with Monika shortly after 3am. We also know Eric Burdon admitted Monika Dannemann called him at around 5:30am. If we apply the forensic graph containing this triangulation to the time period between 3am and 5:30am we can show conclusive forensic proof of murder. This is something the British Inquest into Hendrix’s death never bothered to do.
Doctor Bannister, the attending St Mary Abott’s Resuscitation Room physician, came forward in 1992 to say he had witnessed lungs and stomach full of wine in Hendrix like he had never seen in his medical career and that instead of choking on vomit Jimi Hendrix had died from being drowned in red wine. He estimated the amount of wine he witnessed in Jimi to be “bottles worth”. This is forensically incompatible with the 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content recorded at the autopsy. So much so as to be proof of murder in and of itself. Murder doubters deal with this by attacking Bannister, however the murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed and clothes as well as a scarf around Jimi’s neck and what Bannister estimated to be “a half bottle of wine saturating his hair alone”. Since you can’t vomit out pure wine this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder .
A 3.9mg percent of blood barbiturate content is a knock-out dose, therefore Jimi was unconscious when he died. A forensic clock starting ticking backwards when Jimi died. This was the minimum time period for him to die with only a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content. That time period is very short, especially when a doctor witnessed “bottles worth” of wine inside Jimi and his lungs. In fact, the period needed is so short that it isn’t long enough to allow Jimi to be conscious while the wine was introduced into him. And that is conclusive scientific forensic evidence of murder. It can’t be any other way. You are battling the clock ticking on the barbiturate dose absorption vs the alcohol absorption. It will show that Jimi would have been passed-out at the point of time on the forensic graph that would have allowed a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content. And people who are passed-out can’t drink “bottles worth” of wine – nor can “bottles worth” of wine only register a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content. The forensics clearly lock-in the fingerprint of a fast death after being drowned in wine.
Stomach contents usually pass through the stomach in 4-5 hours. Since Jimi was witnessed eating that rice at a party at around midnight that means he died somewhere around 4-4:30am. The forensic evidence locks in that time. If you look at the circumstantial evidence, confession, forensic evidence, and lies used by Monika Dannemann to cover the real time of death you can’t escape the fact all evidence points towards Jimi being waterboarded with wine in combination with barbiturates, a classic intel method of covert murder.
In my opinion it is rather preposterous to try to deny this with evasions that don’t even bother to examine the otherwise screamingly obvious evidence. The British Government is guilty of incompetence and failure to investigate evidence for murder.
Now we know!
Hi do you remember me
My name is Joyce ..Tony Brown sister could you please contact me
I have information for you
Thank you Joyce
Joyce: I have been trying to contact you for several years…Your old telephone number is no good…I’ll PM you on Facebook…
Hi there
Sorry not been in touch with you before
I had a big heart operation last year valves and arteries
I have found Paul only just a week ago my daughter saw him on face book that’s Tony’s Son
Carol died 2014 with cancer Tony’s wife..
So that’s why we haven’t been able to find her
Can you remember I told you she married a guy name David Biggs
She did marry him
I got he’s Facebook account and he denied knowing her
He’s on Paul’s Facebook friends. People why liar they always get found out in the end
Any way Merry Christmas to you and a Happy New Year
All the best
Joyce xx
Hi I am joy Brown on face book
It’s best to get me on my other email
J.brown96@btinternet.com
Best wishes Joyce
Jan: I have refined the forensics since then…I mistakenly applied the liver barbiturate level (3.9mg) instead of the correct .7mg blood barbiturate level to my forensic calculations above…Consider it a typo since the argument still stands no differently with the .7mg barbiturate level….7mg would still have caused unconsciousness before death and therefore the 5mg blood alcohol content was impossible with a large amount of wine witnessed in the lungs and stomach…This is slam dunk forensic evidence of homicide…
Same bogus claim you make. There is no real forensics as evidence to prove your claim.
Here are the lying words from Brian Doyle aka Buster, a trolling hoaxing clown who makes up fake claims of phony wine and invents an imaginary “forensic clock” for his hoax as he distorts the real record, but is totally clueless about what a 3.9 mg reading represents. Clowns like this always debunk their own hoax and this joker sure has done his fair share of that.
BUSTER says: I’d like to add to Tim Haywards that the denial of the screaming evidence for murder in Hendrix’s case is a typical example of people wanting to believe their government doesn’t operate like an evil machiavellian cult and that all the obvious evidence like Monika Dannemann being caught in outrageous lies about that morning, or Michael Jeffery’s visible in plain daylight MI-5/mafia background and motives, or the forensic evidence, all don’t point towards murder. It’s pretty ridiculous to think the classic government psy-ops propaganda that people want to believe something greater must be involved would cover all the normally obvious intrigue involved in Hendrix’s death. That intrigue is easily shown and available in deep detail if one makes even the most simple effort to look into it – which Tim grants himself the privilege of not doing.
JASON says: Buster makes his phony narration full of fiction and no evidence. Michael Jeffery was not in British Intelligence or the mafia. This is nothing but a baseless claim with no proof or evidence. Jeffery was a club owner who happened to stumble upon “The Alan Price Rhythm and Blues Combo” who was the house act at his club. He became their manager and changed their name to “The Animals” and made them a famous Rock act during the start of the British Invasion. This phony “government” nonsense that Buster spews is just more garbage for his hoax since his flimsy claims he already uses doesn’t hold any weight. Buster calls out Monika Dannemann for her outrageous lies, but if you continue reading the rest of these comments, Buster uses Monika’s outrageous lies for his phony sham “Hendrix Murder Hoax”. Like the phony claim that “Jimi Hendrix fired Michael Jeffery” so then Jeffery killed him in revenge. That is bogus cuz it never happened, but that doesn’t stop Buster from pushing this lie for his debunked hoax. Buster wants to make 2 separate claims for his phony “murder”. Jimi firing Jeffery for the reason of his fake murder and then we get the preposterous “government” angle. This hoaxer wants to run with two phony theories and has added new ones during this decade up to 2019. They are all good for a laugh.
BUSTER says: When Jimi died a forensic clock started ticking. That clock froze a 3.9mg blood level of barbiturate in Jimi’s blood. It also froze a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content into place for the autopsy to register. The autopsist, Dr Teare, also found undigested rice remnants in Jimi’s stomach. These three items create a forensic “triangulation” that can’t be fudged or distorted.
JASON says: Buster winds his phony and imaginary “forensic clock” that he invented in his crazy head. This hoaxer doesn’t seem to understand that a 3.9mg blood level of barbiturates is a fatal level. Post mortem blood concentrations are usually in a range of 0.5-3.9 mg in victims of fatal acute overdose. So, this hoaxer has no clue that 3.9mg is fatal as he pretends Jimi was only “knocked out”. Jimi was knocked out dead from that dose at this 3.9mg level. Jimi’s blood alcohol level was above the legal limit as Dr. Teare said it was “enough to fail a breathalyzer test. The undigested rice proves no imaginary wine was in Jimi’s stomach cuz if Fraud Bannister was sucking out wine then no rice should be present inside the stomach. See how fake these wine claims are? You can’t have rice left in the stomach when these wine clowns claim a “stomach full of wine” that they say was “sucked out” at the hospital by Fraud Bannister. No documentation exists of these phony “wine removals” which proves this whole thing to be one giant sham hoax.
BUSTER says: We know Jimi got back to the Samarkand Hotel with Monika shortly after 3am. We also know Eric Burdon admitted Monika Dannemann called him at around 5:30am. If we apply the forensic graph containing this triangulation to the time period between 3am and 5:30am we can show conclusive forensic proof of murder. This is something the British Inquest into Hendrix’s death never bothered to do.
JASON says: Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated that Jimi died around 4 am so your phony “forensic graph” you made up is already inaccurate. So, you purposely lie about Jimi’s death time so you can push your phony hoax. You’re just like Monika Dannemann lying about the times. And here you attack her when you do the same thing. You’re a hypocrite Buster! There was no “proof of murder” since all your bogus claims are after the fact post 1992 claims. Jimi Hendrix died from a lethal 9 pill Vesparax overdose which returned an above lethal 0.7mg barbiturate level reading. You admitted to this right here in 2020. You’re taking a trip to the future folks!
BUSTER says: Doctor Bannister, the attending St Mary Abotts Resuscitation Room physician, came forward in 1992 to say he had witnessed lungs and stomach full of wine in Hendrix like he had never seen in his medical career and that instead of choking on vomit Jimi Hendrix had died from being drowned in red wine. He estimated the amount of wine he witnessed in Jimi to be “bottles worth”. This is forensically incompatible with the 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content recorded at the autopsy. So much so as to be proof of murder in and of itself. Murder doubters deal with this by attacking Bannister, however the murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed and clothes as well as a scarf around Jimi’s neck and what Bannister estimated to be “a half bottle of wine saturating his hair alone”. Since you can’t vomit out pure wine this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder .
JASON says: Ah yes, Buster’s idol, the 3 count convicted Fraud Bannister who made up his fake tales of wine in 1992 cuz the thought he was going to be sued for medical malpractice again after he read the book Electric Gypsy where in the book it said he was incompetent of not performing a tracheotomy on Jimi Hendrix. Alas, we have the phony wine claim from Fraud Bannister that was never even mentioned until January 1992. All this phony wine Buster narrates and not one hospital document exists of this imaginary wine. If this was something “he never seen before” why are there no records of it? Why didn’t he state this to the media in 1970? The phony wine didn’t exist that’s why. On 9/18/70 St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose and the post mortem then proved it. Jimi Hendrix choked on vomit cuz he had dry vomit in his throat as testified to be both ambulance men. Reginal Jones testified that Jimi choked and never said one word about being “drowned”.The autopsy discovered vomit in Hendrix’s bronchi and no signs of wine was ever detected during forensic analysis of Jimi’s body.
Now Buster fantasizes about a “murder scene” with “spilled pure wine” on the bed and clothes. Ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua testified they only witnessed Jimi Hendrix being covered in dry vomit. Officer Ian Smith never mentioned one word about “pure wine”. Officer Smith confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose when he stated “He received a lot of calls like that in those days” referring to a drug overdose from the ambulance attendant. There certainly wasn’t a lot of phony “wine drowning” calls in 1970. So, this troll Buster can’t produce any evidence of this “pure wine” at the death scene as he claims of his fake “waterboarding murder”. Where is the evidence of this “pure wine” at the death scene? Not a single witness ever saw it. That’s why it’s imaginary wine folks!
BUSTER says: A 3.9mg percent of blood barbiturate content is a knock-out dose, therefore Jimi was unconscious when he died. A forensic clock starting ticking backwards when Jimi died. This was the minimum time period for him to die with only a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content. That time period is very short, especially when a doctor witnessed “bottles worth” of wine inside Jimi and his lungs. In fact, the period needed is so short that it isn’t long enough to allow Jimi to be conscious while the wine was introduced into him. And that is conclusive scientific forensic evidence of murder. It can’t be any other way. You are battling the clock ticking on the barbiturate dose absorption vs the alcohol absorption. It will show that Jimi would have been passed-out at the point of time on the forensic graph that would have allowed a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content. And people who are passed-out can’t drink “bottles worth” of wine – nor can “bottles worth” of wine only register a 5mg/100ml blood alcohol content. The forensics clearly lock-in the fingerprint of a fast death after being drowned in wine.
JASON says: A 3.9mg percent of blood barbiturate content is fatal you troll. Post mortem blood concentrations are usually in a range of 0.5-3.9 mg in victims of fatal acute overdose. So, with the 3.9mg percent of blood barbiturate content that means Jimi was dead and no wine could be poured inside him thus debunking your phony hoax. Do we all believe “unknown murderers” would pour “bottles of wine” inside a man who’s already dead from a lethal overdose? That’s how phony this whole hoax is. Buster goes back to his phony and invented “forensic clock” that doesn’t exist and rambles on trolling about the fake imaginary wine that was never documented or ever forensically analyzed cuz there was no wine in 1970. This is all a phony post 1992 fake invented story. Jimi was “passed out” alright, he was on his way to heaven with a 3.9mg blood barbiturate content. Hilarious how this troll spins his fake narration story. He admitted in 2020 that Jimi died from a lethal 9 Vesparax pill overdose. Scroll down to 2020 and have a look for yourself. You can take a ride into the future!
BUSTER says: Stomach contents usually pass through the stomach in 4-5 hours. Since Jimi was witnessed eating that rice at a party at around midnight that means he died somewhere around 4-4:30am. The forensic evidence locks in that time. If you look at the circumstantial evidence, confession, forensic evidence, and lies used by Monika Dannemann to cover the real time of death you can’t escape the fact all evidence points towards Jimi being waterboarded with wine in combination with barbiturates, a classic intel method of covert murder.
JASON says: Buster now says Jimi died at 4-4:30 am. Other times he lies trying to push it later to 5:30 am. So, we can easily see Buster’s lies and contradictions as he changes his phony stories when he wants to. That is called being a fraud and hoaxing. Again, we hear of the phony and invented “forensic clock” that never existed. No phony “waterboarding” ever happened as no “pure wine” was ever witnessed at the death scene and no wine was ever detected or analyzed during the autopsy. This is back in 2010 and a decade later in 2020, Buster the clown still can’t produce any documents for the phony imaginary he says was removed and witnessed at the hospital. Hospitals document everything and since nothing was ever recorded regarding all this “massive wine” we know this is a hoax and only a fake after the fact claim. Buster dreams up his phony “classic intel method of covert murder”. Only his hoaxing words and fake claim with no evidence to ever produce. Where are your documents of all this wine Buster? Who “murdered” Jimi Hendrix as you fraudulently claim?
BUSTER says: In my opinion it is rather preposterous to try to deny this with evasions that don’t even bother to examine the otherwise screamingly obvious evidence. The British Government is guilty of incompetence and failure to investigate evidence for murder.
JASON says: Your “opinion” is crap and all the readers know it. You make outrageous claims of a “government conspiracy” based on your own fake “forensic science” which is only the nonsense you make up in your crazy head. You accuse the world’s top pathologist Dr. Teare of being involved in a “cover up”. In fact, every doctor or witness that debunks the crap you spew, you claim was “gotten to” or is in a “cover up”. You make baseless phony claims with no evidence and purposely lie about the real events and drug overdose. You don’t have any documents or real evidence. Only your fake narration claims of wine that doesn’t exist. Real forensic science has refuted you. You admitted here in 2020 that Jimi Hendrix died of a 0.7mg lethal level and took a 9 Vesparax pill overdose. Too bad I wasn’t posting back in 2010….I would have debunked your hoax way back then. Well, you had an 11 year run at least. Hope it was fun!
This is stuff that any first year criminology student or detective would have seen right away. The reason it wasn’t investigated at the time is because Jimi Hendrix’s death was a political assassination. British tabloids did CIA’s COINTELPRO dirty work by announcing Jimi had died from a heroin overdose even though the coroner said there was ZERO trace of heroin in his system or any traces of heroin use on his body. To this day, even with this screaming evidence of Jimi’s murder being so obvious and so brazenly denied by the authorities, Jimi’s death is still announced by those fascist Nazi murderers as being a moral lesson and drug overdose.
Some people need this interpreted to them. Jimi’s UPI reporter friend Sharon Lawrence heard about mess at Jimi’s death scene and spoke to Monika at the hotel Eric Burdon had her hiding out in the day after Jimi’s death. Monika was mainly interested in discussing her new career as a Hendrix painter, an opportunity Jimi’s death now provided. And this was 24 hours after Jimi died in her flat. Sharon Lawrence said this strange detachment was creepy. She then asked Monika about the wine that was spilled around Jimi at the death scene. Monika’s reaction was to moan, whine, and whimper in response to the question. For those who are slow on the uptake the reason Monika reacted that way to the question is because she was aware Jeffery had waterboarded Jimi to death with wine and was cornered by something she hadn’t expected to be asked.
Again, for those who need this explained to them slowly, Monika’s response to Lawrence that she “washed ‘sick’ off Jimi’s face with wine” was the quick off-the-cuff excuse she thought-up at the moment and nothing else. Let me frame what is happening in this discussion between Sharon Lawrence and Monika Dannemann on September 19th 1970 in London. Sharon is curious about exactly how Jimi died. Monika is aware Michael Jeffery murdered Hendrix but is trying to lay low and play it off as an accident. Sharon sees all the clues but she doesn’t come to the correct conclusion and ultimately writes in her book ‘Jimi Hendrix Betrayed’ that Jimi may have committed suicide. Sharon wrote the book prior to all this Tappy Wright confession business. She, or anyone else, could have pursued this by asking: “Why then did you say Jimi only had a trickle of vomit on his chin? And that if he only had a small drool of vomit running down his chin then why would you need to wash’ sick’ off Jimi face with wine of all things? Especially when the small flat had warm water and a towel nearby and just as close as any wine would have been?” Nobody ever asked these basic questions until now.
Again, for those who need this interpreted slowly Monika either committed suicide or was “suicided” right before being forced into court by Etchingham to answer these questions. It’s very obvious to anyone with any common sense why that happened. No one bothered to point-out to Monika that the ambulance men witnessed a Hendrix with a face full of vomit that hadn’t been “washed off”. Besides what person who isn’t retarded reacts to a choking dying person by washing their face with wine instead of trying to revive them by slapping the vomit out of their throat and getting them to breathe? Face it, everything we know tells us Monika and everyone else knew Jimi was dead and that he had been murdered by Jeffery. Devon knew this which is why she was found under the 8th floor window of the Chelsea Hotel 5 months later.
The so-called “Hendrix Community” has taken a pass on this evidence. They have no credibility. They are basically spineless jellyfish who see it as easier to let Jimi flap in the wind murdered than disrupt their hedonistic sucking-off his music and talent. This is something that hasn’t changed since the day Jimi was murdered. I condemn them.
What needs to be done here is either a mock trial needs to be filmed and presented showing the real evidence and how it was criminally-avoided by the British Government -or- a movie needs to be made showing the real story. As sinful as Jimi personally was himself, his story is very Christ-like. Christ’s story being the “Story of you and me”. Jimi knew he would be murdered by Jeffery for firing him.
Tin foil hat stuff here. Ambulance men and police saw no wine at the flat
Brian Doyle aka “Buster” uses more fantasy claims and uses a liar named Sharon Lawrence for his bogus “murder” hoax for which he has no real evidence except for his lying phony narration.
BUSTER says: This is stuff that any first year criminology student or detective would have seen right away. The reason it wasn’t investigated at the time is because Jimi Hendrix’s death was a political assassination. British tabloids did CIA’s COINTELPRO dirty work by announcing Jimi had died from a heroin overdose even though the coroner said there was ZERO trace of heroin in his system or any traces of heroin use on his body. To this day, even with this screaming evidence of Jimi’s murder being so obvious and so brazenly denied by the authorities, Jimi’s death is still announced by those fascist Nazi murderers as being a moral lesson and drug overdose.
JASON says: Brian Doyle aka “Buster” posts more disinformation for his bogus “Jimi Hendrix Murder” Hoax. There wasn’t any “political assassination” .This serial troll makes up bogus tales without any real evidence except for his hoaxing words.
Jimi was using Heroin and that was told by several people at the time.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed that Jimi Hendrix died from a dug overdose on 9/18/70 but did not confirm it was barbiturates One of Jimi’s associates said it “could have been heroin” and that rumor leaked to some of the press. So, this garbage you are posting is crap, since Jimi died from the overdose of ills he swallowed.
BUSTER says: Some people need this interpreted to them. Jimi’s UPI reporter friend Sharon Lawrence heard about mess at Jimi’s death scene and spoke to Monika at the hotel Eric Burdon had her hiding out in the day after Jimi’s death. Monika was mainly interested in discussing her new career as a Hendrix painter, an opportunity Jimi’s death now provided. And this was 24 hours after Jimi died in her flat. Sharon Lawrence said this strange detachment was creepy. She then asked Monika about the wine that was spilled around Jimi at the death scene. Monika’s reaction was to moan, whine, and whimper in response to the question. For those who are slow on the uptake the reason Monika reacted that way to the question is because she was aware Jeffery had waterboarded Jimi to death with wine and was cornered by something she hadn’t expected to be asked.
JASON says: Instead of posting accurate information, Brian Doyle aka “Buster” resorts to using fiction from notorious liar Sharon Lawrence who made up many lies in her Jiimi Hendrix fiction book.
Sharon Lawrence stated in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by swallowing 9 pills based on numerology and his obsession with the occult. There would be no need for this imaginary wine when Jimi died by killing himself on purpose. So, Sharon” lies are debunked and so is the crap this hoaxer Brian Doyle aka “Buster” was peddling for his sham hoax.
There is no audio evidence of this supposed phone call and we only have Sharon’s lying words that this interaction took place. There was no wine witnessed on the bed by two ambulance men, so that destroys this bogus lie. Both ambulance men and the police only witnessed dry vomit on Jimi and the bed.
Michael Jeffery was in Spain on 9/18/70 so this bogus tale by Brian Doyle aka “Buster” is easily debunked.
During Jimi’s autopsy, there were no signs of this phony “waterboarding” and forensic analysis of the entire inside of Jimi’s body never detected any wine, The bogus tales of wine were invented in 1992 by Fraud Bannister the 3 count convicted fraud doctor.
This is just more fantasy crap coming from a banned serial troll.
BUSTER says: Again, for those who need this explained to them slowly, Monika’s response to Lawrence that she “washed ‘sick’ off Jimi’s face with wine” was the quick off-the-cuff excuse she thought-up at the moment and nothing else. Let me frame what is happening in this discussion between Sharon Lawrence and Monika Dannemann on September 19th 1970 in London. Sharon is curious about exactly how Jimi died. Monika is aware Michael Jeffery murdered Hendrix but is trying to lay low and play it off as an accident. Sharon sees all the clues but she doesn’t come to the correct conclusion and ultimately writes in her book ‘Jimi Hendrix Betrayed’ that Jimi may have committed suicide. Sharon wrote the book prior to all this Tappy Wright confession business. She, or anyone else, could have pursued this by asking: “Why then did you say Jimi only had a trickle of vomit on his chin? And that if he only had a small drool of vomit running down his chin then why would you need to wash’ sick’ off Jimi face with wine of all things? Especially when the small flat had warm water and a towel nearby and just as close as any wine would have been?” Nobody ever asked these basic questions until now.
JASON says: We get a phony interpretation from Brian Doyle aka “Buster” who is just making up his own bullshit here. Not one thing this troll is saying is factually accurate.
Michael Jeffery was in Spain and there was no evidence of any “waterboarding” so
this bogus tale is easily shot down.
Everything this clown is typing are after the fact clams.
Why does anybody do the things they do a particular time? Cuz it made sense to
them when they did it.
BUSTER says: Again, for those who need this interpreted slowly Monika either committed suicide or was “suicided” right before being forced into court by Etchingham to answer these questions. It’s very obvious to anyone with any common sense why that happened. No one bothered to point-out to Monika that the ambulance men witnessed a Hendrix with a face full of vomit that hadn’t been “washed off”. Besides what person who isn’t retarded reacts to a choking dying person by washing their face with wine instead of trying to revive them by slapping the vomit out of their throat and getting them to breathe? Face it, everything we know tells us Monika and everyone else knew Jimi was dead and that he had been murdered by Jeffery. Devon knew this which is why she was found under the 8th floor window of the Chelsea Hotel 5 months later.
JASON says: More phony interpretations from a troll with no evidence.
When a person is profusely throwing up, they are still going to have vomit after their face was washed, moron.
More bogus after the fact interpretations. Monika was under the influence of drugs herself and you can’t “slap vomit out”, moron.
Michael Jeffery was in Spain on 9/18/70 and Devon was a junkie which is why she died. This hoaxer Brian Doyle aka “Buster” makes up bogus tales but he has no evidence to prove anything.
BUSTER says: The so-called “Hendrix Community” has taken a pass on this evidence. They have no credibility. They are basically spineless jellyfish who see it as easier to let Jimi flap in the wind murdered than disrupt their hedonistic sucking-off his music and talent. This is something that hasn’t changed since the day Jimi was murdered. I condemn them.
JASON says: You are condemned for lying and perpetrating this bogus “murder” hoax for 11 years to the year 2020. All your lies and garbage has been debunked as you’ve rolled the internet pushing this junk that is only fantasy.
BUSTER says: What needs to be done here is either a mock trial needs to be filmed and presented showing the real evidence and how it was criminally-avoided by the British Government -or- a movie needs to be made showing the real story. As sinful as Jimi personally was himself, his story is very Christ-like. Christ’s story being the “Story of you and me”. Jimi knew he would be murdered by Jeffery for firing him.
JASON says: Blasphemy does not prove your phony bogus lies. It was confirmed through forensic medical science that Jimi died from a 9 pill drug overdose.
Jimi never fired Jeffery you lying turd. Jimi was unable to fire Jeffery due to the way Jeffery structured his contract. Jeffery was a shrewd business man and would never allow his clients to have the ability to fire him. The contract was iron clad and even members of The Animals could never get out of it. You are a pathetic dirty liar who spreads false misinformation on purpose trying to smear and disparage a dead man.
From The Guardian:
“While at the hotel, Hendrix made several telephone calls. Dannemann said he phoned his lawyer Henry Steingarten, asking him to find a way out of his contract with his manager Mike Jeffery, and producer Eddie Kramer, for whom Hendrix left a voice message.”
JASON says: This proves you are a lying turd. Jimi was trying to find a way out of his contract. He couldn’t fire Jeffery who had an iron clad contract. this proves there was no phony “murder” cuz Jeffery had no motive since he wasn’t fired and was in Spain.
Another bogus lie debunked from this lying demented trolling hoaxing turd named Brian Doyle who is banned from every Jimi Hendrix forum and site for posting this crap.
I argued these same points to Ceasar Gleebek on WPFW in November during the annual Jimi Hendrix Tribute.His responses were indictments of Jimi and were overtalking a skill then he was indeed it’s master.Unaware that his interviewers were both African-American men over 50, he asked whether or not we had ever possibly thought that racism could be involved instead of the recent revelations,new toxicology reports from Rufus Crompton,and an article in Classic Rock where Terry Slater reports for the first time anywhere that he and Monika actually witnessed the ambulance arrive from across the street.We all need to stay in touch,It is about to become very interesting…..
Yes Cordell I can’t figure out what Caesar’s trip is. He should understand the implications of what he is doing and how it will reflect on him. Did you know he is coming out with an entire issue of his Univibes magazine dedicated to “debunking the murder nonsense”? I can’t believe he would do that to Jimi. I’ve already made efforts to talk to some people who specialize in taking apart articles or publications that commit such offenses and making sure their authors don’t get away with it. Caesar’s misguided efforts won’t go unopposed. I sent Caesar an e-mail listing the forensic reasons that prove Jimi was murdered. He responded “wait until the issue comes out”. I am going to make sure Caesar regrets doing that.
If we cut right to the chase here Slater’s admitting he stood with Monika at the payphone destroys Monika’s story. Monika was either murdered or committed suicide because of her desperation to not admit this obvious lie, which was already proven anyway with the witnessings and phone records. Now this is the important part, because Monika’s story is now broken that means the official British cause of death verdict is also broken since it depended directly on Monika’s now disproven story to make its determination. The official verdict is now invalid because it has formally been proven to not be legally sound. All the decisions and judgments on Jimi Hendrix’s death were determined directly by the means of Monika Dannemann’s accounts of that morning. Since Slater’s testimony and the phone records corroborate the evidence that disproves Monika’s account, it means the British Inquest’s official verdict was not legally sound. Scotland Yard committed a crime when it internally reviewed the evidence and claimed it was sound. If you look at the details of what they did they lied and changed the real accounts of the witnesses in order to cover-up their knowing complicity. They covered-up their own knowledge and involvement.
The murder that the British Government is now attempting to get away with is saying that they reviewed the evidence and came to the same conclusion as the official verdict. You have to be kidding right? But there you have it, you have Scotland Yard, which possesses some of the most sophisticated criminal detection practices in human history not afraid to insult the intelligence of the public by straight-facedly offering an investigation of themselves at their own word without producing any information to show how they did it. This, of course, defies all known definitions of civilized rule of law, and is something they themselves would laugh out of court if anyone else tried it, but there you have it and they are trying to stick with it no matter how much obvious evidence appears.
What needs to be done here is someone with legal standing needs to sue the British Government for failing to uphold its own written definition of law. They need to press a case that forces the British Government to recognize their original verdict has now been legally proven to have been false. This means the British Government is now legally forced to publicly re-examine the evidence behind Jimi Hendrix’s death and be accountable for the process and its findings, something they’ve conspicuously avoided up to now.
Cordell, I’d like to get in touch with you somehow. What needs to be done here is a ‘Justice For Jimi’ website where the issue is forced and people can see how provable the evidence is.
It has been said by some that Michael Jeffery could not have been among Jimi’s murderers —if he was murdered—because Michael Jeffrey was in Spain at the time.
But was Michael Jeffery really in Spain?
In McDermott & Kramer’s HENDRIX: SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT Bob Levine is quoted with regard to Jeffery’s whereabouts.
pp. 287-288:
“Back in New York, the question of Jeffery’s whereabouts remained unanswered. ‘We tried calling all of Jeffery’s contacts – from [his club] Sgt. Pepper’s to the Hotel Victoria in Majorca – trying to reach him,’ remembers Bob Levine. ‘We were getting frustrated because Hendrix’s body was going to be held up in London for two weeks and we wanted Jeffery’s input on the funeral service. A full week after Hendrix’s death, he finally called. Hearing his voice, I immediately asked what his plans were and would he be going to Seattle. ‘What plans?’ he asked. I said, ‘The funeral.’ ‘What funeral?’ he replied. I was exasperated: ‘Jimi’s!’ The phone went quiet for a while and then he hung up. The whole office was staring at me, unable to believe that with all of the coverage on radio, print and television, Jeffery didn’t know that Jimi had died. He called back in five minutes and we talked quietly. He said, ‘Bob, I didn’t know,’ and was asking about what had happened. While I didn’t confront him, I knew he was lying because I had spoken to people who saw him at a party Track Records had staged in London the night before Hendrix died. I knew everybody who had attended, from Douglas’s pair – Stella and Colette– to Devon, as well as friends from Harold Davison’s office. It was impossible for him to have slipped incognito into Spain without hearing about Jimi’s death.”
Alan Douglas, Stella Benabou Douglas and Colette Mimram are still alive, I believe. Someone should ask them if they remember seeing Michael Jeffery at the party at Track Records on the evening of Sept. 17, 1970.
And if Michael Jeffery WAS in London then, how could Jim Marron have met & talked to Jeffrey in Spain, as Marron claims (quoted in SETTING RECORD STRAIGHT, 286-287)?
Scott,
There seems to be very few people interested in this even though it is a nuclear scandal laying right out in the open. Some researchers have interviewed those attending the party, which included many more than just Stella and Collette. It seems Jeffery wasn’t at Kameron’s party that night on the 17th/18th. Jeffery was at another Track Records party on the 13th where Jimi dodged him not wanting to confront him on the issues that led to his firing.
As for Jim Marron, he spoke to Jeffery on the 18th and Jeffery canceled their dinner date because of Jimi’s death. So when Bob Levine called him a week later and Jeffery pretended not to know Jimi was dead there was something seriously wrong there. Jeffery was making sloppy mistakes due to his guilt over murdering Jimi. And don’t make the mistake of thinking Jimi wasn’t murdered. He most assuredly was, as this evidence and other strong forthcoming evidence proves – not to mention the forensic evidence which proves Jimi was murdered beyond a doubt.
Bob Levine recently made a total retraction of everything he said, including your quotes above, for Caesar Glebbeek’s publication entitled ‘Until We Meet Again’. Caesar had the nerve to write a long magazine-length work trying to debunk the murder evidence. Levine exposes his guilt by suddenly denying everything he’s said for years, pointing suspicion at Jeffery, with a blanket denial. That’s the typical pattern of someone trying to hide something serious. Bob knew much more than he was letting on to. He made a mistake though. Levine said Jeffery told him during a call to Majorca on the 17th that he would not be available due to a boating outing the next day. This was MI-6 Jeffery making-up a pre-emptive alibi to make sure he was unavailable after the murder. Jeffery was suspiciously unavailable during Jimi’s drug bust and kidnapping the same way.
In the long-run whether Jeffery was actually at the Samarkand or not doesn’t matter. He arranged the whole thing and probably told Tappy Wright he was there in order to cover for accomplices involved in a much deeper intel plot. Just look at all this openly available evidence and ask yourself why the authorities are so uninterested? It’s because Jimi was assassinated by the United States Government’s Central Intelligence Agency in a COINTELPRO political assassination using Michael Jeffery’s mundane business motives for plausible deniability. Jimi was wacked by the CIA and that’s why no government seems interested in investigating it. CIA kills with barbiturates and alcohol in order to appear as a drug overdose.
There’s some highly unintelligent Hendrix fans out there on the internet who use Jeffery’s literal location to deny the whole murder, however more sophisticated investigators would see that the evidence is more than there no matter where Jeffery was located. If you look at the alibis there’s not a single person who says exactly where Jeffery was and what he was doing that established the alibi.
Brian Doyle aka “Buster” the clown is promoting more phony fantasy tales here. Some of this crap he reads in bogus conspiracy books, but the bulk of it, he makes up himself. All lies and bullshit that this fraud tells you.
BUSTER says: There seems to be very few people interested in this even though it is a nuclear scandal laying right out in the open. Some researchers have interviewed those attending the party, which included many more than just Stella and Collette. It seems Jeffery wasn’t at Kameron’s party that night on the 17th/18th. Jeffery was at another Track Records party on the 13th where Jimi dodged him not wanting to confront him on the issues that led to his firing.
JASON says: More bullshit from this serial hoaxer “Buster”. Michael Jeffery was never fired by Jimi Hendrix. Jimi had no authority to fire Jeffery due to the way Jeffery structured the contract. Michael Jeffery was a shrewd businessman and he would never allow his clients to have the ability to fire him. That’s why your hoax is an entire joke. Chas Chandler was still under contract with Jeffery who had to buy him out even after he left The Animals. Jeffery had an ironclad contract and there was no way for Jimi to get out of it. The contract ran until 1972 and Kathy Etchingham verified that after she viewed the contracts herself in 1992. You don’t know anything about Jimi Hendrix. Only the bullshit fantasy crap you peddle you claim for “evidence”.
BUSTER says: As for Jim Marron, he spoke to Jeffery on the 18th and Jeffery canceled their dinner date because of Jimi’s death. So when Bob Levine called him a week later and Jeffery pretended not to know Jimi was dead there was something seriously wrong there. Jeffery was making sloppy mistakes due to his guilt over murdering Jimi. And don’t make the mistake of thinking Jimi wasn’t murdered. He most assuredly was, as this evidence and other strong forthcoming evidence proves – not to mention the forensic evidence which proves Jimi was murdered beyond a doubt.
JASON says: Bob Levine and Trixie Sullivan has discredited this bogus tale. There was a major storm that went thorough Majorca Spain on the morning of the 18th that knocked out the power. There was no power or television. That was 1970 where there was no iphones or internet. Unless you watched the news or read the paper you had no knowledge of Jimi’s death. Bob Levine clearly stated in the press that Jimi “being murdered is bullshit”. He also said Jeffery was innocent and this is all a bogus lie. Sullivan said that Jeffery was terribly upset that Jimi couldn’t phone him cuz the phones were down. Jimi was not “murdered” and you still have no evidence, joker, and you posted this crap 10 years ago. This is now 2020, and you still have the same amount of evidence as you did back then, which is not a damn thing, except for your made up tales of fiction.
BUSTER says: Bob Levine recently made a total retraction of everything he said, including your quotes above, for Caesar Glebbeek’s publication entitled ‘Until We Meet Again’. Caesar had the nerve to write a long magazine-length work trying to debunk the murder evidence. Levine exposes his guilt by suddenly denying everything he’s said for years, pointing suspicion at Jeffery, with a blanket denial. That’s the typical pattern of someone trying to hide something serious. Bob knew much more than he was letting on to. He made a mistake though. Levine said Jeffery told him during a call to Majorca on the 17th that he would not be available due to a boating outing the next day. This was MI-6 Jeffery making-up a pre-emptive alibi to make sure he was unavailable after the murder. Jeffery was suspiciously unavailable during Jimi’s drug bust and kidnapping the same way.
JASON says: No, Bob Levine was just setting the record straight after bogus stories were made up about him. Bob Levine said Jimi was not murdered and Jeffery was innocent. Levine also stated that Tappy Wright is a fraud who made a bogus tale to sell his crappy book that nobody bought.
Now you attack Bob Levine, then a few years later, you hounded and harassed this sick man in his nursing home trying to coerce him into agreeing with your bullshit “murder hoax that he still never confirmed. Bob’s mind was failing him and you tried to get him on video to agree with your bullshit. He never did haha. You are just a lying lowlife turd who will stoop as low as you can to peddle this bogus phony “murder” crap.
Yeah, you know exactly what Jeffery was doing in Spain on the 17th of 1970 as you make this shit up in your crazy head 40 year later. What an idiot and you expect people to believe this crap. You are a clown. Your fake made up tales are a joke and your fake “murder” caper claim is debunked since Jimi couldn’t fire Jeffery.
BUSTER says: In the long-run whether Jeffery was actually at the Samarkand or not doesn’t matter. He arranged the whole thing and probably told Tappy Wright he was there in order to cover for accomplices involved in a much deeper intel plot.
JASON says: WTF? You claim Jeffery “waterboarded” Jimi to death with wine. Now you say it doesn’t matter if Jeffery was at the Samarkand? Of course it matters, you dumbass, you’re accusing Jeffery of murdering Jimi Hendrix so Jeffery needs to be there. So, you’re changing your bullshit story and debunking your own hoax of Jeffery “murdering” Jimi.
Do you see how this serial troll just changes his stories anytime he wants? This hoax is a total joke. Too bad I didn’t post here 10 years ago, this nonsense would have been ended back then.
So, this lying troll turd, Brian Doyle aka “Buster” accuses Michael Jeffery of “murdering” Jimi Hendrix with bottles of wine and now he changes his story to that Jeffery “arranged” it and “probably” told Tappy Wright he was there to cover up more sinister plots. Again, this is all bullshit made up inside this lunatics head. He was claiming Jeffery was there and now makes up a new fake story of Jeffery “arranging it” and “covering up” for others. This troll changes his fake stories anytime he wants. That’s why this whole thing is a joke and is not to be taken seriously.
BUSTER says: Just look at all this openly available evidence and ask yourself why the authorities are so uninterested? It’s because Jimi was assassinated by the United States Government’s Central Intelligence Agency in a COINTELPRO political assassination using Michael Jeffery’s mundane business motives for plausible deniability. Jimi was wacked by the CIA and that’s why no government seems interested in investigating it. CIA kills with barbiturates and alcohol in order to appear as a drug overdose.
JASON says: Fake imaginary wine is not evidence and for 11 years up to 2020 you can’t produce one single shred of evidence, including medical documents to shows your phony wine. You are full of shit and have zero evidence to prove.
This trolling turd “Buster” said it was Michael Jeffery who killed Jimi Hendrix cuz Jimi fired him (which Jimi never did) the evening before. Then Buster said it was MI5 or MI6 that killed Jimi. Now he changes it to the CIA. If you read through the years this clown says it was the mafia and then random London thugs. Buster has all kinds of different “murders” killing Jimi Hendrix for his hoax. He is a hoaxing clown and we all laugh at him.
Jimi Hendrix died from a lethal overdose of Vesparax that was confirmed in his autopsy. The toxic barbiturate level was 0.7mg and his liver read 3.9. Dr. Crompton confirmed this to Katy Etchingham and its written in Jimi’s autopsy. Nobody is killed with barbiturates by the government. This joker needs mental help.
BUSTER says:There’s some highly unintelligent Hendrix fans out there on the internet who use Jeffery’s literal location to deny the whole murder, however more sophisticated investigators would see that the evidence is more than there no matter where Jeffery was located. If you look at the alibis there’s not a single person who says exactly where Jeffery was and what he was doing that established the alibi.
JASON says: Jeffery was in Spain which was confirmed by 3 sources, and in your fantasy world, you have Jeffery appearing wherever you want him to be. That’s how we all know you are a lying trolling turd who makes up bogus tales for your debunked hoax.
You are pathetic and are a fraud accusing dead people of murder based on your own lies coming from your mentally deranged head. Get some mental help for your own sake.
Dear Buster,
Thank you for this long, articulate response. Exactly when did Jimi actually fire Michael Jeffery? I am aware that Jimi had been kidnapped, that it appeared to be connected to Jeffery, that Jimi wanted to go with new management and had been talking with Alan Douglas about this, etc., but I did not know that Jimi had actually taken steps to fire Jeffery. Weren’t they still partners in Electric Lady Studio?
Buster, I have read other comments of yours about Hendrix on other sites. All articulate and persuasive. Your argument is presented with more persuasiveness than that presented by Alex Constantine in his COVERT WAR ON ROCK, in which the chapter on Jimi Hendrix is filled with lots of factual errors.
Tomorrow, November 24, 2011, I will be hosting a three-hour radio program “Jump Start” on station KPOO, 89.5 FM (San Francisco). I will be celebrating on air Jimi’s 69th birthday (Sunday, Nov. 27th). Should you receive this in time, and should you be awake then, please listen online at:
http://www.kpoo.com/hearus.html
Click on the old-fashioned radio icon to listen on Itunes.
I would like to write to at length on this subect. You can contact me at:
dolabella32@gmail.com
Jimi never fired Michael Jeffery. Jeffery had an ironclad contract and he would never allow a client to be able to fire him. Kathy Etchingham read the contracts and disputes this bogus claim.
This debunks the phony claim.
“While at the hotel, Hendrix made several telephone calls. Dannemann said he phoned his lawyer Henry Steingarten, asking him to find a way out of his contract with his manager Mike Jeffery, and producer Eddie Kramer, for whom Hendrix left a voice message.”
Buster is lying and making up lies for his debunked hoax. it clearly states “Jimi phoned his lawyer Henry Steingarten, asking him to find a way out of his contract with his manager Mike Jeffery, and producer Eddie Kramer, for whom Hendrix left a voice message.” That’s cuz Jimi was unable to fire Jeffery since he had an ironclad contract Jimi was only looking for a way out.
Buster is a nut who makes up bogus lies for this ridiculous debunked hoax.
Scott,
Try to get a copy of Monika Dannemann’s book ‘The Inner World Of Jimi Hendrix’. In it she describes how Jimi deliberately sat her down next to the phone at the Cumberland Hotel and had her listen to him calling his New York Lawyer Henry Steingarten instructing him to sever his ties with Michael Jeffery no matter the contractual consequences. If you read Tony Brown’s ‘Jimi Hendrix: The Final Days’ you’ll see there was no doubt Jimi was spending the last week of his life in London preparing to fire Jeffery. Most Hendrix fans dismiss Monika’s witnessing by saying she is a known liar (which she is), however that has nothing to do with her witnessing of the phone call. After all, if you look at Monika’s lies they are made for a rational reason in order to cover something up. There is no rational reason for her to invent the phone call to Steingarten. Are those fans suggesting Monika decided to invent a totally random story about Jimi firing Jeffery? Smart people will realize Steingarten’s associates like Steve Weiss were still alive when Monika told this story. They never made any comment on it. That should tell you all you need to know. The call was real. Being a total crook Jeffery had arranged for Steingarten to be both his and Jimi’s lawyer. Following his duty as Jeffery’s lawyer Steingarten called Jeffery to warn him of Jimi’s action. Jimi fired Jeffery at around 5pm September 17. 11 hours later Jimi was dead. It doesn’t take a Sherlock Holmes to figure out why. The combination of Dr Bannister’s witnessing and the autopsy data shows Jimi was drowned in wine as Tappy Wright claimed. The British Inquest and Scotland Yard never bothered to address this because they knew Jimi was murdered by CIA. Welcome to the satanic fairyland of western governments and their intelligence agencies.
Read ‘Final Days’ and you’ll understand that Jimi’s hours-long late night discussion with Alan Douglas; call to Kramer in NY to get his studio tapes; visit to Chas Chandler to ask him to produce again; and his general paranoia and stress, witnessed by many, were all evidence of his intention to fire Jeffery. Jeffery murdered him for it and Scotland Yard murdered him again by not investigating it. Michael Jeffery was a cheap two-bit scumbag manager. There’s no way Scotland Yard would cover for him. They would, however, forego a real investigation for their main ally’s Central Intelligence Agency using one of their MI-6 agents to murder a COINTELPRO target.
Great analysis Buster, I’m a huge Hendrix fan and for years I believed that he died in the ambulance on the way to the hospital. After researching a little I came to the same conclusion, that my hero was murdered. I was just wondering, since it is a strong possibility Hendrix was unconscious when the wine was poured down his throat, doesn’t that open the possibility that Monica did the pouring? I mean, if she slipped him the sleeping pills, and he was out cold, it wouldn’t take a gang of men to hold him down and pour the wine down his throat. I guess what I’m saying is I think there is a strong possibility that she was in cahoots with Jeffery, and may have actually killed Jimi.
You are a liar Buster, trying to sell your phony propaganda. Jimi Hendrix never fired Mike Jeffery on September 17, 1970 cuz he couldn’t due to the way Jeffery structured the contract. You are making up lies and promoting fraudulent events that never happened.
“While at the hotel, Hendrix made several telephone calls. Dannemann said he phoned his lawyer Henry Steingarten, asking him to find a way out of his contract with his manager Mike Jeffery, and producer Eddie Kramer, for whom Hendrix left a voice message.”
It says right here, that Hendrix only left a voice message for his lawyer only “looking for a way” to get out of his contract. You are selling fraudulent lies saying “Jimi fired Jeffery”. This is a bullshit claim by you. You lost your phony murder motive since Jeffery was never fired.
Hoaxing clown “Buster” makes up more lies for his bogus debunked hoax.
BUSTER says: Try to get a copy of Monika Dannemann’s book ‘The Inner World Of Jimi Hendrix’. In it she describes how Jimi deliberately sat her down next to the phone at the Cumberland Hotel and had her listen to him calling his New York Lawyer Henry Steingarten instructing him to sever his ties with Michael Jeffery no matter the contractual consequences.
JASON says: You are a lying hoaxing clown. That’s not what happened at all. Here’s what allegedly took place from the pathological liar Monika Dannemann.
“While at the hotel, Hendrix made several telephone calls. Dannemann said he phoned his lawyer Henry Steingarten, asking him to find a way out of his contract with his manager Mike Jeffery, and producer Eddie Kramer, for whom Hendrix left a voice message.”
JASON says: Nowhere does it say that Jimi fired Jeffery. Jimi was unable to fire Jeffery cuz Jeffery had an ironclad contract.
BUSTER says: If you read Tony Brown’s ‘Jimi Hendrix: The Final Days’ you’ll see there was no doubt Jimi was spending the last week of his life in London preparing to fire Jeffery. Most Hendrix fans dismiss Monika’s witnessing by saying she is a known liar (which she is), however that has nothing to do with her witnessing of the phone call. After all, if you look at Monika’s lies they are made for a rational reason in order to cover something up. There is no rational reason for her to invent the phone call to Steingarten. Are those fans suggesting Monika decided to invent a totally random story about Jimi firing Jeffery? Smart people will realize Steingarten’s associates like Steve Weiss were still alive when Monika told this story. They never made any comment on it. That should tell you all you need to know. The call was real. Being a total crook Jeffery had arranged for Steingarten to be both his and Jimi’s lawyer. Following his duty as Jeffery’s lawyer Steingarten called Jeffery to warn him of Jimi’s action.
JASON says: This is just phony made up nonsense coming from this hoaxer Brian Doyle aka “Buster”.
Jimi did nor fire Jeffery cuz he was unable to due to the ironclad structured contract.
You lied about the alleged phone call cuz it never said Jeffery was ever fired.
Monika was always looking to clear her name as being responsible for Jimi’s death. After Jeffery died, she could make up stories say whatever she wanted to clear her name.
More made up nonsense by this clown. You know all the business dealings that went on in the management? LOL
Steingarten could not call Jeffery cuz there was a big storm that passed through Majorca, Spain and all the phone lines were down. Jimi tried to phone Jeffery in Spain but he couldn’t get through.
Buster the clown wants us to believe Steingarten could make a call when the lines were down.
Buster Also wants us to believe Jeffery could “arrange” this phony elaborate “murder” in a couple of hours on short notice. Buster also lied claiming “Jeffery murdered Hendrix” and he changed his story to “Jeffery arranged it”. Just total bullshit and made up lies.
BUSTER says: Jimi fired Jeffery at around 5pm September 17. 11 hours later Jimi was dead. It doesn’t take a Sherlock Holmes to figure out why. The combination of Dr Bannister’s witnessing and the autopsy data shows Jimi was drowned in wine as Tappy Wright claimed. The British Inquest and Scotland Yard never bothered to address this because they knew Jimi was murdered by CIA. Welcome to the satanic fairyland of western governments and their intelligence agencies.
JASON says: More bogus crap from a serial internet troll. Jimi could not fire Jeffery due to the ironclad contract Jeffery had structured. This troll “Buster” has no evidence to prove this firing happened cuz it never did.
The autopsy data showed no wine inside Jimi Hendrix during forensic analysis.
Fraud Bannister has no documents of his bogus and phony wine claim.
This serial troll now says it’s the CIA who “killed Hendrix” after this lying turd “Buster” aka Brian Doyle said it was Jeffery and MI5 or MI6 as he previously said. This lying turd roll keeps changing his phony stories as usual.
BUSTER says: Read ‘Final Days’ and you’ll understand that Jimi’s hours-long late night discussion with Alan Douglas; call to Kramer in NY to get his studio tapes; visit to Chas Chandler to ask him to produce again; and his general paranoia and stress, witnessed by many, were all evidence of his intention to fire Jeffery. Jeffery murdered him for it and Scotland Yard murdered him again by not investigating it. Michael Jeffery was a cheap two-bit scumbag manager. There’s no way Scotland Yard would cover for him. They would, however, forego a real investigation for their main ally’s Central Intelligence Agency using one of their MI-6 agents to murder a COINTELPRO target.
JASON says: The only scumbag her is “Buster” aka Brian Doyle who makes up the terrible lies for his bogus debunked hoax.
Jimi was unable to fire Jeffery, and if he did, Jimi would have told everybody about it. it never happened.
Just more fantasy crap made up inside the head of this psycho who never in 11 years posted one piece of evidence for the crap the peddles.
I say with dead seriousness that Monika may have been a CIA COINTELPRO covert operator otherwise known in espionage parlance as a “honey trap”. The forensic evidence I’ve developed does not preclude Monika doing it, however there’s reason to believe that Jimi was murdered as Michael Jeffery confessed to Tappy Wright. Most of the dummies on the internet don’t understand how real these covert programs were at the time. However, if you study Monika’s statements she shows a pattern that traumatized psychopaths sometimes show. She speaks of people pushing her out of the room at hospital – but this most likely happened at the Samarkand. She speaks of the ambulance men putting Jimi in a chair and tipping his head back when he tried to breathe – again this probably happened at the Samarkand. No, a good Sherlock would realize if Monika did it she would have waited longer and pretended she was sleeping and woke-up to find Jimi that way. The reason she called out for help to Eric Burdon was because Michael Jeffery was his manager and he would know what to do. I’ve just recently realized the calling for the doctor business is made-up. If Monika was really calling Burdon for the doctor’s phone number then why didn’t she call the doctor? She never called the doctor. Judy Wong said Monika called for the doctor’s number but she lied. She was told to say that. Monika never reached out to get the doctor’s phone number she reached-out to get Burdon because he would know what to do about Michael Jeffery murdering Jimi. I’ve just realized this recently after several years of studying this. This really is a dirty scandal of previously unrealized proportions. I think she was in cahoots with Jeffery but got fooled into waylaying Jimi with pills not knowing what the intention was. Now you see why she couldn’t talk. The key here, James, is Monika’s statement to Caesar Glebbeek in 1975 saying “there was evidence that could not be brought to the police and that the mafia killed Jimi for sure.” Think about what she was trying to say there…
Stay tuned, you’ll see more on this soon.
“No, a good Sherlock would realize if Monika did it she would have waited longer and pretended she was sleeping and woke-up to find Jimi that way.”
I disagree. I think Monika’s story, which we know is false, was her way of trying to insulate herself from any possible prosecution. In her mind she thought she’d be protecting herself.
“hey, if I say I was out of the flat to go buy some cigarettes, and came back to find Jimi like this, I couldn’t be the one who did this, I wasn’t there”
In her mind this was a kind of backup alibi in case the authorities did expect foul play and decided to investigate.
I think she either was a plant by Jeffery from the beginning in order to have intel on Jimi and what he was doing and thinking, or was coerced by Jeffery at a later date to do his bidding.
We know there was evidence that she was extremely jealous and possessive of Jimi around other women. It is possible she was just like Jeffery and thought “hey, Jimi’s gonna leave me, I better act now”. I think that her and Jeffery, or her and maybe one or two others who worked for Jeffrey carried out the events of that night.
I would personally like to have Jeffery exhumed and a dna analysis done to make sure that that was even him who supposedly died in the air crash. Anyway, the whole series of events is rotten from the head down IMHO.
If you did your research properly Grassy Knollington you,d know that Jefferys body was not recovered from the crash. As to Busters claim that the rest of us “Internet Dummies” have no idea of the truth I suggest we all bow down to your obviously higher intellect and you go ahead and present your proof to the nearest British Police station where they will have to by law look into any evidence you present. I see your last post was in April and have heard nothingin the media .Maybe the “Dark Forces” have silenced you or you,ve just walked away from your computer to get a life.
If you have nothing but here say then just go away and let Jimmi rest in peace . If you have any proof present it.
But please please shut up no mark cos you were,nt there .
More conspiracy nonsense here LOL.
BUSTER says: I say with dead seriousness that Monika may have been a CIA COINTELPRO covert operator otherwise known in espionage parlance as a “honey trap”.
Buster says: I think she was in cahoots with Jeffery but got fooled into waylaying Jimi with pills not knowing what the intention was.
Funny how you always contradict your phony conspiracy theories. Here you claim Monika was was a secret covert agent and then you claim she didn’t know what the intention was. Great theory! lol. Just more made up nonsense.
Buster says: The forensic evidence I’ve developed does not preclude Monika doing it, however there’s reason to believe that Jimi was murdered as Michael Jeffery confessed to Tappy Wright. Most of the dummies on the internet don’t understand how real these covert programs were at the time.
Your “forensic evidence” is based on phony quotes and made up scenarios. Then Bannister’s claims of wine as you match up the autopsy report lol.
Michael Jeffery never confessed to “murdering Jimi”. Jeffery was in Spain when Jimi died and Tappy Wright admitted he lied to sell his phony book. Even the worst Hollywood movie wouldn’t accept your fantasy script.
” I disagree. I think Monika’s story, which we know is false, was her way of trying to insulate herself from any possible prosecution. In her mind she thought she’d be protecting herself. ”
A shrewd detective would see why that isn’t so. If you look at Monika’s behavior she was trying to keep Jimi, not kill him. A sharp eye will see that Monika had pretty safely gotten away with it by 1975 when she admitted to Caesar Glebbeek on his Dutch radio show that “there was evidence that could not be brought to the police and that the mafia murdered Jimi for sure”. Now if Monika had drowned Jimi why would she expose the possibility of foul play and only stand to bring attention to herself by admitting this? Monika was very cunning, as her actions over the ensuing 25 years showed. Calling Burdon at 5:45am wouldn’t “protect” her, as you say, but would do the opposite. It would be too short a time to explain Jimi overdosing and choking on his vomit. There’s things I can’t explain right now that will come out soon but Monika’s admitting the mafia killed Hendrix wasn’t what you would call concealing the issue. She did that because in 1975 Crawdaddy Magazine had put out an issue claiming Jimi was the target of some kind of death squad. She felt it was about to break so she confessed. What you fail to understand, James, is that the British Government was acting in cooperation with the US Government and would not seek evidence in the death of a “Security Index” listee, and that still holds true today. Monika never had any chance to be caught, which is why her flimsy stories held up so well despite their obvious flaws. Murder by brute drowning in wine is a Newcastle thug/Military Intelligence manner of murder. It isn’t the act of a young German girl groupie fighting to be Jimi’s fiancee.
BUSTER says: Murder by brute drowning in wine is a Newcastle thug/Military Intelligence manner of murder.
JASON says: How come ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed this “Murder by brute drowning in wine”? These two men never saw any wine at the flat. How do you explain that Buster the clown? “Super absorbent bedding” or were they “too busy” trying to keep an already dead Hendrix “alive” not to notice? Yes, those were the two lame excuses you gave for the reason these men witnessed no wine at the flat. Really pathetic after you claimed this “brutal” wine drowning.
What about Officer Ian Smith or the coroner’s officers who were there to collect the blankets and vomit samples? Why didn’t they witness this “brutal wine drowning murder?
Why didn’t the forensic analysis of the blankets or vomit turn up any evidence of this “brutal wine drowning”?
There was never any “wine drowning” that’s why. No wine was ever witnessed or detected either by analysis or professionals who witnessed the flat. This is all phony baloney pure fantasy you make up for kicks.
You are just a fraud making up phony stories for your hoax. You’ve been at this nonsense for almost 10 years now.
All you have are invented stories you make up with not a single shred of evidence to prove.
Craigy’s post doesn’t have a reply button. I’ve read that the French air crash morgue showed Gerry Stickells a photo of a charred and mangled corpse and then handed him a plastic bag of jewelry they said they took from that corpse. Stickells said he immediately recognized Jeffery’s wristwatch and pendant. So either Stickells is lying and is in on it or the French investigators are lying and are in on it. So either way the case is surrounded by incriminating intrigue because once you get to that level of corruption there’s something serious to hide. However I believe Jeffery perished in that crash. (Though it is perfectly in-line with his MI-6 depth that MI-6 would get French Intelligence to cover-up his not being on that flight. But just as equally it is possible the crash was a freak accident)
I’m glad Craigy identifies himself as an internet dummy by being defensive because he’s a perfect example of what I’m talking about. Anyone could see that even with his shallow excuses there’s still plenty to be curious about. Jeffery seems like a personality who could not stay out of the action. But even if he went into hiding that in itself would show a level of intrigue that would necessitate cooperation by the same shadowy underground intelligence community I’m getting at. It would make Jeffery as deep as the things he’s being accused of. Craigy, typical of his kind, doesn’t seem to notice.
Another thing Craigy stupidly doesn’t fathom is that Scotland Yard and the British Police have already been approached on this by Kathy Etchingham and her petition. They then did a fake investigation, intimidated witnesses into confusing their statements, and ignored the fact Monika’s story was easily refuted. At the time the detective who interviewed the main witnesses commented that they were all lying. Usually when a British detective finds that all the witnesses to the death of an important figure are lying they then respond by applying a interested investigation. In the case of Jimi Hendrix they did nothing. And when approached with further evidence they sought to deny it and deliberately ignored incriminating facts. Yet Craigy accuses me of not doing adequate research. Scotland Yard lied when it came back and said there was no new evidence. The whole time they had proof that Monika was lying and Dr Bannister had witnessed serious medical evidence. Scotland Yard has never once interviewed Dr Bannister, instead he lost his medical license for billing fraud.
No sorry, you’ve already seen the proof. If you lack the personal facility to comprehend it is not my fault. Nor is saying “cos you weren’t there” very credible. As anyone could see the statements and forensic evidence were “there” enough to draw credible conclusions. Ones that Scotland Yard has no excuse for ignoring or lying around.
Not good enough Craigy. Jimi can’t afford your ignorant complacency and indifference.
Ever wonder why Stickells never elaborates on this?
Buster
Glad to see the dark forces haven,t got to you and you are able to reply , although I notice that you still haven,t produced any evidence any one can take to the Police in this country . Are you a resident of the UK ?
Have you ever dealt with the authorities in these Islands ?
Yes their a long way from perfect but were they any worse than any other countries in the late sixties ? I,ll come to that soon but first my reply for its worth.
Firstly I was going to apologize for the vitriol of my original post but on reflection reading your reply I feel I was correct in the first instance its just the quality of my reply that I apologize for but hey thats musicians for you !!
My original gripe was with the way people on the inter net (usually young single men ) will pick a situation in life thats a mystery,or unexplained and because nature hates a vacuum they fill it with garbage and hear say conspiracy theory while telling any one who disagrees with them is nieve has a vacuim between their ears . Apart from always being suspicious of people who claim that the rest of the world is stupid and only they know the truth they are also rather stupidly adding to the very thing they protest against by muddying the waters of very serious situations they are commenting on there by helping the very “Dark Forces ” they claim they are protesting against.Publishing rumour and here say as fact just does there work for them with all of this disinformation.
I imagine that every intelligence agency in the world has the “office boy” logged on to all the internet forums stirring this stuff up. Their laughing at you boy, and your just perpetuating this balloon juice for them while they get on with really running this world.
Now with regards to the death of Jimi Hendrix I would be here all day answering all the nonsense posted on the net about his tragic passing so lets just go through your reply to me.
1/ Mike Jefferies has no known grave site as far as I,m aware of, and if there was it would be desecrated by Hendrix fans.There was no proper identification of his body. Fact. So no DNA tests there, though I.m glad to see you don,t perpetuate the false hood that the controllers strike was a set up, takeing the conspiracey to ludicruss degrees.
We had a Freach Air Traffic Controllers strike every summer in the early seventies during the busy holiday periods with the tragic results every year which is why they dont strike any more, though the still some times work to rule !
2/ Quote ” Shallow Excuses ” a bit chippy , please explain where it was making excusses, it a very short post and I mentioned no particular points. Why the axe to grind ?
3/ Claim I “don,t see the obvious ” that Jefferies was a very shady guy, we done Sherlock , gosh I never noticed. The music industry is full of shady characters doesn,t mean they killed their clients. Jefferies MI5 involvement is pure sepculation and any way not proof in its self. Please point out to me what I,m not seeing ?
4/ Fake investgation ? that I stupidly fail to fathom.
So youv,e accsess to the names of the Officers involved and there orders from above and their fake investigation notes ?
Well done ,lets see them so I can see how stupid I,ve been unless your a fantasist as well as insulting and don,t know what your talking about.
Please show me how this jnvestigation was faked, and I don,t mean random speculation.
Oh yes and “typical of my kind “………….have we met ,what is my kind ?
5/ Yes we all know Monika lied, of coures she did , thats plain to see from the way she lied at every turn……… more about her in a bit . As for the ambulance men ,police and medical staff all there statements tied up preatty much exactly years later. In fact one of the young officers was the land lord of a local pub just round the corner from a mate of mine in Aylesbury. He had nothing to hide, not the sort to be involved in any great plot. I mean hey you never know but there it is , no proof see.
As for Jimis friends (so called) of coarse they lied , they didn,t want to get in trouble for removing narcotics from what was a potential crime scene and respectful midle age ment they wanted to deny that. Any way Jimi had been dead for hours by then, it was all a bit after the facts.
6/ No new evidence ? Funny I thought they had finally disproved Ms Dannemanns lies. The reason they could not go any furthur, at first ,was because the original and very flawed inquest still stood and with the passage of time and lack of evidence , it would not be easy to hold a new one although I feel in time the original would be declared nul en void. What I believe was about happen was Crown Prosecutions were going to prosecute Ms Dannemann for lyinging at the original Inquest, then the way would have been open to charge her with man slaughter, maybe murder. But proceedure has to be followed evidence gathered , there were plenty of people in this country gunning for Dannemann at the time and private and official forces were closing in.
And then after the Etchingham libel case, which was the new test of guilt, she kills her self. No theres no evidence she was murdered , maybe she just couldn,t face what was about to happen to her. She had lied so much , and the whole pack of cards had come down , and ugly birds were coming home to roost.
A quick history lesson as I feel your alot younger than me and may be not from this country.
The investigation into Jimi Hendrixs passing was obviously flawed and was very much of its time. In fact it was an exact rerun of the death of another rock star death just the year before and was all so very much a sign of the times.Brian Jones death was not investigated properly either and also left today a vacuum that people fill with nonsense and speculation.Today the lowest tramp found died in the street would quite rightly be afforded the respect of a better investigation into their passing.
As the ambulance men said at the time it was an every day occurance in London at the time and Hendrix wasn,t treated any differently because he was black he was just another young person who had died after ingesting to much of something that had killed him. I am just old enough to remember what a stange place London was in 1969/70 ,awash with very hard drugs and many more drug addicts living on the street.The proceedures at the time were very lacks and steps were taken along with improved forensics in the seventies to make sure sloopy proceedure like the kind mentioned above didnt happen again.
In the seventies we all believed Dannemanns stock story that Jimi hadn,t been looked after properly by the medical staff and I was shock but not surprised that it was all a pack of lies.
Not surprised because in the years leading up to that investigation she had rather unwisely uped her profile, and what strange bird she was spouting spearitual rubbish at every oppertunity.
At the time instead of keeping a low profile like any sane person in her position would have done she was sueing any one and every one who was contradicting her story, and loseing every case.
Who was giving her legal advice and representing her ? They should be struck off for malpractise and misrepresentation.She was a habitual lier and not a very good one.Not some one you,d pick to cover your tracks in a murder.
After Dannemannes death the police had no where to go, dead ends , only speculation. Unless of coarse you know better and can point them in the right direction. Yes ? No ? Stories ?
7/ Dr Bannister was not spoken to because he did not perform the autopsy and had given his statement earlier.Why should what he said have changed. A mid ninties investigation was carried out on all the staff envolved in Jimis case and found to have followed good practise.
Bar raising Jimi from the dead there was only so much they could do and they followed proceedure.Dr Bannister being struck off in Australia is not relivent to the old case .
Of course Jimi wanted to get away from his manager , who wouldn,t , and his manager was p****d at that prospect , only natural. doesnt mean he killed him though.Obviously Jimi was hiding out at Dannemanns while being booked in at his own hotel so he went to her hotel of his own free will.There is no prior connection between her and Jefferies so isnt funny how the one girl out of dozens Jimi could have spent the night with was also in the employ of his killer . There is no connection just speculation.
Monika Dannemann was a seriously ill women who had serious mental health problems.Thats the sort of bold statement I would not usually have made, Im not a mental health worker but you dont need to be a weather man to know its raining. If she had gone to court, which if she had lived she most certainly would have ,I feel her previous evidence would have been made inadmissible and she would plead not guilty on the grounds of diminished responsibility.
But now Im speculating ,see how easy it is to do, but what Im saying is there were only two people who knew for sure what happened that night at The Samarank(sp?) and their both now dead , with one killing them selfs before they were brought to book.
Was Jimi killed by his manager ? I dont know , maybe,but theres no evidence
Was Jimi killed by the CIA ? Maybe , but again theres no evidence.
Im I complacent ? certainly not ? ?
Im furious that Jimi was most properly murdered.
Like most Brits Im proud that Hendrix came to the UK to make his music after being rejected in his own country. Im also ashamed that he wasnt served well by the powers that be when his death needed to be investigated and Jimi at least being given justice in death.
What I wouldnt do is go on the inter net makeing wild claims about speculation on subjects I know nothing about and then claim them to be proof, thus muddying the already murky waters and actually makeing it even harder to get to what really happened. Im ignorent am I . You who only has insults and heresay and you call that a considered arguement when what I asked for was evidence.
By the way Im still waiting for your “evidence”. If you live in the UK go to the nearest police station and present it. If you dont live here my e mail is availible on request , send it to me and I,ll present it for you . But I,m talking reality here not some stuff you read when old liers are trying to sell a book and get money for health care.
Surely you dont believe every thing you read on the internet ?
If so your as big a fantasist as Monlka Dannemann and likely to get yours self into trouble later in your own life.
All the best Craig McTaggart
ps oh and the next time you insult me Buster have the good manners to put your real name not hide behind Jimis Seatle nick name . You do him an injustice. Either shit or get off the pot.
In my experiences in arguing this on the internet I’ve found that the British are viciously in denial that the great Jimi Hendrix was murdered in their country by a member of their Military Intelligence agencies and covered-up by their government. Craigy and his post is a good example. Most people are smart enough to see a person who is more interested in the excuses than the evidence.
Craigy wrote: ” I’m furious that Jimi was most properly murdered. ”
As anyone can see, Craigy writes in his own words what he really believes and what he just spent the last many paragraphs beating around the bush over. If anything Craigy’s post serves as a good example of how this matter is viewed in England and the prevailing obfuscating logic and mentality by which it is controlled. It’s a helpful post because I don’t think Craigy realizes he’s giving a perfect example of what I was talking about.
1) What I posted still holds true. Stickells said he was shown a picture of a charred and mangled corpse and given a plastic bag full of jewelry that he recognized as Jeffery’s. The records of how Jeffery’s body was handled should be investigated.
I don’t think Craigy has a sound grasp of the evil depth of intel and its practices. Those covert practices are shown in numerous books and Jeffery’ mid-air crash is well within their capabilities and methods. It is possible Jeffery died in a genuine freak mid-air crash, but its convenience to intel is too obvious to at least not be considered or investigated. This is not a matter to be considered from a bar stool. Once again, I don’t think Craigy realizes that he himself is showing the lack of clear information on Jeffery’s death only reinforces the credibility of the theories.
2) Like your post here. This matter can be handled at much greater depth than you’re doing and that in itself shows why you don’t have a good grasp of the evidence.
3) There’s tons of evidence to show Jeffery was intel. His friends and own father said so. His military record shows he passed the intel aptitude test during his national service. Russian was not taught to regular recruits. His father said all his mates came home on furlough in their uniforms while Jeffery wore civilian clothes. There’s zero doubt whatsoever Jeffery was intel. The stories he told were based on his true background and his need to express its sensational-ness. Jeffery told intel stories because of his bursting awareness of how incredible their doings were and how much they were able to get away with them without people knowing. It was hard for Jeffery to contain knowing how intriguing it was.
4) Scotland Yard did not seek the truth during Kathy Etchingham’s 1993 petition. They honored Monika’s proven lies about that morning and made no effort to investigate the evidence that proved them. They also never bothered to interview Dr Bannister and ask him what he witnessed. This is criminal malfeasance and breech of public trust and duty plain and simple. You shouldn’t be questioning me you should be questioning them.
5) Craigy, I don’t think you understand that by saying “Jimi was dead for hours,” as you do above, that you preclude the need for me to respond to everything before it. Your constable had a sworn duty to bring forth his witnessing if indeed he witnessed Jimi dead as you admit all the attendants did above. Common sense tells you it doesn’t take 5 hours to remove a personal use stash from a small flat. These people were cleaning-up murder evidence.
6) Again, I don’t think you realize how keen a comparison Brian Jones is considering he was murdered by drowning as his groundskeeper Frank Thorogood admitted on his deathbed. Thank you. You offer a perfect example of how these rock figures who became liabilities were conveniently murdered without any protection from the British government while the establishment trumped-up their drug immorality. In the end all you are really saying is those lax practices helped cover-up Jimi’s murder.
Monika is a typical patsy who’s eccentricities can be used to defame her credibility as Craigy shows. She actually won her libel cases as far as her accounts of that morning and succeeded in shutting-down any inquiries into the events of that morning. If you don’t see how her lawyers and Scotland Yard assisted her in that you’re blind to the evidence. Monika’s lies were protected by the authorities as their non-interest shows. If you think Scotland Yard had nowhere to go after Monika’s death you have a weak understanding of the evidence. And if you think Scotland Yard will cheerfully and honestly cooperate after what they’ve already done you’re the “fantasist”!
7) You obviously don’t know what you’re talking about because Dr Bannister was the attending emergency room physician who removed wine that was not available to autopsist Dr Teare 3 days later. His witnessing was critical and Scotland Yard had no right ignoring it. Contrary to their being “no new evidence”, as Scotland Yard said, Dr Bannister’s witnessing was critically important. Dr Bannister had never entered any statement on record about the wine. The rest of the staff were not seriously approached or interviewed – ever. Your entries show a lack of grasp of the critical evidence and skip over important things in a superficial manner. However I totally agree with your last sentence in point # 7.
You don’t know Monika’s relationship to Jeffery. She shows the pattern of an intel spook being worked-in to Jimi’s surroundings. Even if she was just an innocent groupie she could have been manipulated by Jeffery. Or maybe just straight threatened and intimidated. There’s plenty of evidence for this if you read Monika’s accounts of being threatened in her book. I also feel people exaggerate Monika’s mental state in order to avoid looking at her state of involvement. It is common practice for intel to destroy serious witnesses with mental illness defamation. Meanwhile Monika herself said on Caesar Glebbeek’s own 1975 radio show that “There was evidence that could not be brought to the police and that the mafia killed Jimi for sure.” Why, Craigy, would Scotland Yard be uninterested in such a comment during their “re-investigation”??? If you had a solid grasp of the evidence this event was witnessed by much more than just Jimi and Monika. But, really, Craigy, who would really need to go beyond what Monika said on Caesar’s radio show?
I’m not worried Craigy. Anyone can see my arguments and evidence are pretty much there and haven’t been scratched by your pointless protests. Typical of brits, peer pressure obviously forces you into that transparent calling of obvious evidence “wild speculation” instead of giving it its due. There’s much more to this than you know. I’m sorry but I have little respect for people who see obvious evidence and their unconscious reaction to their awareness of it is to protest it isn’t proof. As my arguments show, I should not be the one answering the questions because it is indeed the other side that hasn’t provided the adequate “proof”.
I think we all know Jimi was murdered.
My god how bad is your grammer, Ive just read your post and tried to pick the sense out of the nonsence Im just having my tea ( yes very british) and will answer your points tomorrow where regardless of what happened that night you’ve contradicted your self many times over.
But before I pick the bones from your fantasy let me repeat your view point is biased and anti Brit which in its self is no argument at all.
I dont even really need to look to closely at what youv’e said , all though I will in time but I will repeat what I said before and wait again for a proper reply.
Of course James Marshall Hendrix was murdered you numb head , and if youv;e got evidence that any one other than M\s Dannemann was envolved I and alot of people here in the UK would like to hear it.
The case is still open, if any one tells you otherwise then with freash evidence it HAS TO BE BY LAW reopened.
Now my name is Craig McTaggart and I live here in the UK , Hatfield Hertfordshire and if I or any other person approached my local or any other Police Station in the UK with a complaint about the Jimi Hendrix murder , or any other unsolved case they would have to by UK law look into any evidence presented to them and put forward any outstanding evidence regarding the case.
Now your argument is that over here we are all corrupt and nothing will be done .
I notice that dispite asking where you are from you refuse to say weather you live in the UK or not and yet still make sweaping statments about how we do do things here.
Believe me theres very much a serious blood letting going on here
between the media and the powers thar be. MPs have been put in prison ,
Police charged with corruption,news papers closed down.
There has never been a better time to take evidence to a indepentent journalist here in the UK with a story of wrong doing .
And if your still convinced that wer’e all totaly corrupt here in the UK our worsoning relationship with our European neighbers leaves open every chance of you taking evidence to a foriegn news paper or court, because the powers that be would like nothing better than to give this country a good moral kicking .
So yes go ahead , as I said ,shit or get off the pot.
Of course Jimi was murdered so I,ll tell you what I,ll do I,m gonna go in the loft, get down all the various books relating to this , ring the various office to see who are the officers that this “cold” case is now with and then you give me or them the names and evidence of the peoples who murdered James Hendrix.
Its the 25 th Jan to day , lets wait till Monday 28 th to see what you got other than hear say , rumour and fantasy .
I think most smart people can see the internal conflict in what Craig writes. He said he would come back and reply but never did. If you read what Craig writes he seems to be expressing a challenge to my claims and openly calls them “fantasy” but then turns around and admits even he thinks Jimi was murdered. I think Craig is confused and doesn’t even know what point he is making himself. If you subtract the Fallstaffian buffoonery Craig enters and just get to the heart of the matter, yes, Jimi was murdered, as Craig admits, and it was the way I spelled out in the posts Craig challenges but then comes around and agrees with. The worst part of all this is Craig is a prime example of the British and how they’ve dealt with this since it happened, despite his protests.
If you read my posts correctly I quite clearly state that I think Jimi was mudered by his so called “girlfriend ” and was badly served by the police at the time.
My point to you from the start was have you any evidence to the contrary you can present to the Cold Case Dept at New Scotland Yard London and yet all youv’e done since is say nothing real only insults. A difference of opinion with clear arguement I can take but the arguement of insults means nothing.
Didnt you read a single thing I said because youv’e not attempted to answer a single question ?. Unlike JImis music or back story you are saying nothing.
PLease show our posts to family,friends, and mentors then move on because youv’e still said nothing other than your racist views on the British.
Jimi loved this country and I made a point of stating my name and address ,while you insult, then hide and more to the point say nothing.
This is not any thing to do about James Marshell Hendrix and more to do with you .
Now Ive said repeatedly say some thing that could be considered evidence in court or go away.
Craig McTaggart Hertfordshire UK
BUSTER says: I think we all know Jimi was murdered.
JASON says: Who “Murdered” Jimi Hendrix?
Buster the clown likes to invent his own made up phony stories like he did in his post about Jeffery and claim this huge “murder caper”, but he is terrified to answer the main point of his phony “murder claim”.
He runs away like Chicken Little when you ask him.
That shows all of us that he is a fraud perpetrating a hoax.
Buster the clown has no evidence of wine at the flat nor can he name his “murder suspect” but he loves to make up phony claims in his head.
That’s not how it works folks. You need proof and evidence and Buster has nada.
You have no wine at the flat cuz not one person ever testified to witnessing any wine.
So Buster, who “murdered” Jimi Hendrix?
*crickets*
Eric Burden also had a motive to help Mike Jeffrey kill Jimi, not to mention the strength.
With Jimi dead Burden’s failing career with the animals(managed by Jeffrey),his financial security could be helped by extra revenues from Jimi’s insurance policy, most likely promised by Jeffrey if he(Burden) helped restrain jimi.
He(Burden) admitted to being with Monika earlier the fatal day and was jamming with Jimi at Ronnie Scots the night before, so he knew exactly where Jimi was.
I also wondered why he wrote the song “Spill The Wine” when no real reference to its relevance appears in the song.Could it have been that he (Burden) had the vivid memory of Jimi’s murder on his mind,watching as much of the wine poured down Jimi’s throat ‘spilled’ in the murderous act.
Burden has also changed his version of events and did have a motive.
“Spill The Wine” was one of the first things I checked-out. It was released in May 1970 so it couldn’t have been in reference to Jimi’s murder because Jimi died in September. No, as far as I know I don’t see Burdon having anything to do with it. He was asleep with Alvinia Bridges back at the Russell Hotel when Monika called there for help. Shoot, Jeffery ripped Eric off blind of millions with the Animals. There’s no way Jeffery was sharing anything with Burdon, or anyone for that matter. Also, I think the band War was doing fairly well at the time. Jimi had a borderline lethal dose of Vesparax sleeping tablets in him according to his autopsy, so I don’t think he needed to be restrained. His blood barbiturate level showed he was passed-out when the wine was poured in to him. I would be curious, however, of learning where you heard Burdon was with Monika earlier that day? I’ve never heard that.
“Craigy” is obviously ignorant of this case. If he had a more intelligent researched understanding he would know that Scotland Yard has already had a go at this case and was clearly not interested in finding out the truth. What Craigy writes is foolish and is easily disproven by the simple fact that Scotland Yard is one of the foremost detective agencies on the planet with a world class reputation that gave birth to figures like Sherlock Holmes and many films. What Craigy is asking us to believe is that he, in his bar-room folksy manner, was able to fathom that Monika was somehow guilty of murdering Jimi but Scotland Yard, when given the chance to look in to it, wasn’t able to figure that out. Like I said before Craigy and his patent disingenuousness and cross-eyed stumbling upon his own logic is a classic representation of the very British people who murdered Jimi Hendrix and the false domain they call England along with its easily refuted, insincere reasoning and methods.
Scotland Yard was asked to re-investigate this by Kathy Etchingham in 1992. They did a going-through-the-motions pretend investigation and then announced in 1993 that there was no new evidence and that the British taxpayers would not be asked to pay for any further inquiries. Mind you, this was at the same time that Monika’s story was proven to be false, yet Scotland Yard backed it and its veracity and said there was no new evidence. They lied. Also, Dr Bannister had come forward to say Jimi was drowned in wine. Scotland Yard’s reaction? They never even interviewed Dr Bannister. You would think the attending doctor’s coming forward to say he witnessed evidence of Jimi being drowned in wine would be something Scotland Yard might be interested in? No, instead they ignored it and said there was no new evidence. If Dr Bannister’s witnessing wasn’t “new evidence” I don’t know what else would be? Yet, despite this clear record of Scotland Yard duplicity Craigy insists we should dutifully go to them and ask them to look in to it. He never once breaks form to realize the reason Scotland Yard then, in 1992, as well as now, never honestly investigated it was because it was a covert political assassination done by one of their MI-6 members Michael Jeffery.
About Eric Burdon:
In his 2nd autobiography DON’T LET ME BE MISUNDERSTOOD (2001), Burdon has seriously contradicted himself.
Toward the end of Chapter 7 –his account of the death of Jimi Hendrix– Burdon says that he has read Tony Brown’s THE FINAL DAYS OF JIMI HENDRIX (1997) and has now been persuaded that Monika’s stories were less than truthful.
In Brown’s book, the statements of two ambulance drivers Reg Jones and John Saua –neither of whom had worked together before or since — are cited on pp. 135-137.
Reg Jones: “….nobody about, just the body on the bed.” (135)
John Saua: “When we got down to the flat, there was nobody there. Just the body on the bed.”
Yet, on the first page of chapter seven, Burdon tells us that the ambulance drivers told him that Jimi would be OK as they were carrying him up the stairs.
Hard to believe.
But in the book,Burdon don’t say that the ambulance drivers told it to him. Just say “I was told Jimi was still alve”, so if no were the paramedics who said that, was Monika who said it to Burton, and she was liar.
Burdon knows a lot more than he’s saying. The comments in ‘Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood’ were made in 2001, 5 years after Monika’s death when Eric could retreat into a permanent safe position. Trust me, Eric knew that Monika’s stories were less than truthful at the time. He just can’t admit it because it would incriminate him. They were afraid Jeffery would murder them too so they concocted a bs cover story and stuck to it. Now they can’t admit it. Monika killed herself over it, or was suicided by some very evil people.
It is a very interesting English Court drama Eric lives indeed. They killed our magic prince…
My reply to you is if we are so corrupt here in the UK why is it we have just sent to prison a man who just a few years ago by just a few votes nearly became our Dupty PM but now after his own addmission of fraud is now serving hard time.
All so other mps and members of our “FREE” press are doing hard time for wrong doing in clear site of the public and are being punished for wrong doing at public approval.
If you look back in between your own ramblings I have repeatedly agreed that lies were told and things not done right regards Jimis case, but if hear say and fantasy are spouted as fact then no one would get to the truth, you are just muddying the waters, and you are very much helping the people you claim to be against.
Who ever “THEY” are.
Your own unashamed rasism against the UK serves no one but your own agender. Yes its easy to say I wont go to the British police their the bad guys.
What are you going to do ?
Ok, well done, you figured it out, the rest of us are stupid dolts.BRAVO!!
Now what are you going to do ?
Write a book?…………………………………. well done that will really show them.
No seriously what are you going to do ? Apart from throwing insults at me peddling your bias against this country
Jimi was an open person , properly to open , had no prejudice, but he wouldn’t have put up with you and your bigoted attitude for two seconds.
So insult away but tell we what are you really going to do because if you went public with what youve said you’ll be laughed at.
Monika a credible witness? Please ! You contratic your self at every turn and your only arguement is insults and bias. Thats not debate. Thats not fact. I can agree to defer but not trade insults.
Hey BUSTER who really are you . Where are you. Do you even exist .
You have no credibiity if you don,t come forward and just hide behind Jimis child hood nick name
All the best Craig McTaggart
Almost 7 years later and you still have no case. LMAO
I’m sorry Craigy but your input shows a complete ignorance of the Cold War practices of our Central Intelligence Agency. If I may, I believe a few good books would not hurt in your case. You fail to fathom that the answer to the conflicts you wonder over is the very information that I posted. That the British government had a unholy covert alliance with our CIA and cooperated in the cover-up of their political assassinations. If you ridicule the very notion of those assassinations I suggest you study some American history and the murder of Black Panthers by the American government’s COINTELPRO Program. Your input is quite passable if we were to limit this to offhand street talk, however we are much deeper into some very real things connected to some very real and proven government assassination programs that you have failed to live up to in your responses.
No, your admission that lies were told and Jimi wasn’t done proper justice isn’t good enough I’m afraid and once again serves to show a pure example of the British treatment of this and how they are afraid to confront the Crown and its autocratic authority. Your answer isn’t good enough and doesn’t respond in a credible manner to the proof that Scotland Yard acted with intent in covering-up the evidence they were responsible, by their own self-definition, to follow-through on. No, instead of pressing Scotland Yard on its duplicity Craigy attacks those who are trying to do Jimi justice. This is typical of the brits and they don’t seem to know if they are attacking or defending with their vicious, thuggish approach. Craigy accuses me of muddying the waters, but I suspect Craigy is just parroting things he doesn’t quite understand the meaning of because a true sounding of the real reasons for Jimi’s death is just the opposite and is one of the most clarifying things you could possibly do.
I think most people can see by now that Craigy is just a boorish blusterer who doesn’t quite know what he is saying himself but is quite sure of his conviction. He’s too ignorant to know the waters he’s entered or what truly lurks beneath them.
Paranoia < like all mental illness comes in many forms.
As for why the British establishment would want to kill Hendrix is beyond me, not through any lack of understanding on my part but more because from growing up in this country I know there would be many more people way up the list before him. People who are still alive and in rude health in there old age.
Also you refused to say where you live thus denying me the right of reply.
Your view of this country is about face. The Crown has no power,our Parliment a little,our courts a little more.My country is, like I suspect yours is mainly run by big business. Im not happy about this as Im sure your not, but Im not naive enough to believe the Prime Minister runs the country. No body does, but thats another matter because that by proxy does not mean you arguement is corrct.
As for bluster ! ! Shheeess Jesus H . Mine have been very small and direct compared to your own senseless and rather loooooooooonnnnggg ramlblings.
I need to read more books? Well of coarse I do , we all do. I read many books while getting my History degree and with,time and god willing ,I'll read many more before I'm done.
I'll also not believe everything I read in those books and come to my own conclusions.
I was quite serious when stating you should show these posts to a neutral third party, they show some very worring signs of paranoia and manic depression. Thats not a cheap shot to discredit you , thats a genuine corncern for another
human being who seems quite distubed.
I hope you do though I doubt it , as youv'e refused to address directly a single piont I,ve made, just long rambling, repetitive posts and then and then accuseing me of bluster!! Bad spelling Yes, The length of my posts compared to yours no.
So I wish you all the luck in the world , you might one day find that smoking gun.
Im of to persue my busy , but .modest music career , and if Icome across anything to do with the Hendrix case I know where not to come.
If you do find any proper evidence please try and contact me directly, I know of a number of indepedent people in the media who would love to take a swing at the so called "Establishment" in this country. I repeat this is the time.
These posts now end All the best Craig McTaggart.
Ps .Peace and best wishes to the people of Boston .USA. 12.04.2o13
Again, I don’t think any sensible person would take Craigy seriously. I thank him for doing all the work to show us he doesn’t have a credible opinion on this. I actually thank Craigy for his input because he represents a good example of why Jimi Hendrix’s murder went unsolved for so many decades in the country where he was murdered. He can’t give any credible answer to why Scotland Yard failed to detect any of the evidence and that’s all you need to know about Craigy, his methods, or his credibility. Sorry Craigy, blather is no substitute for credible analysis. Get back to us when you can honestly answer the facts.
Hey Buster do you have a website or Further reading resources online? I am a Brit and have no hesitation in agreeing with you beliefs of how Jimi met his end.
I wish I did. I was banned by the morons who run Crosstown Torrents because I tried to show the evidence. I was permanently banned by a British coward who hides behind the handle “Fenders Fingers”. He’s a brave and powerful man when he can make truth-tellers disappear with the moderator censor button. That site is run by a puff who calls himself “Pat”. He allows bastard moderators to troll the site and rough-up serious posters. His view of defending Jimi against his murder was simply “You can’t do that here.” He shouldn’t be allowed to run the internet’s only major Hendrix site, he’s not qualified. None of those cowards show up outside of their bully pit to back their Hendrix death views in the real man’s world.
Try reading Britisher Tony Brown’s book ‘Hendrix The Final Days’. Also read the murder parts in Henderson’s ‘Scuse Me While I Kiss The Sky’ 2009 edition. Finally, though she gets the cause of death totally wrong, read Sharon Lawrence’s book ‘Jimi Hendrix: The Intimate Story Of A Betrayed Musical Legend’. It contains much valuable witnessing when viewed in the correct murder context.
Buster, great points. So, Burdon’s claims that Jimi’s poem ” The Story of Jesus (sic)” being a suicide note was a feeble attempt at using an alibi ?
What stands out most to me is that Jimi was found dead in bed fully clothed.
The introduction to the last edition of David Henerson’s book, he makes a statement referencing Jeffeys, Burbon , AND Alan Douglas as people who were all connected to Jimi directly or indirectly (peripheral people) the night/morning of his death; Henderson’s not too cryptic way of saying the three worked in harmony or possibly independent towards Jimi’s demise .
Where does Alan Douglas fit in all of this. I know Jimi was banging his wife ( as well a Eric Burdon’s wife) but I thought Douglas was not at issue with this fact.
How do you interpret Hendereon’s triangle ?
Bingo. It’s nice to see someone with an intelligent understanding respond for a change. That’s why I’m into this because this is a wicked scandal of monumental dimensions equal to that of Jimi himself. Persons with a good sense of this will see Jimi is a prophetic figure whose fate is in direct proportion to his being. If you look closely Eric’s going on BBC and saying Jimi committed suicide was his way to keep from being killed for what he knew. You see Eric had a healthy understanding of Michael Jeffery and his dimensions.
If you read Monika’s book ‘The Inner World Of Jimi Hendrix’ she said Jimi turned to her and told her he thought Devon had OD’d him. However in the same book Monika said Jimi was talking with her casually up until 7am when she fell asleep. Most Hendrix fan dummies don’t catch the conflict in that. You see Jimi last saw Devon at the Kameron party. If Devon had OD’d Jimi with a mickey then normal drug behavior would dictate that Jimi would feel it immediately upon getting to the Samarkand and pass-out shortly after – which would preclude the 4 hour gap Monika speaks of from 3 to 7. Unfortunately, if you have a good decoding of Monika and her statements this creates some ugly morbid possibilities. Jimi probably did tell Monika that but in reaction to the Vesparax he was overdosed with. I’ll leave it to your imagination how this scenario illustrates Monika’s involvement, however anyone can see she certainly can’t be innocent at this point and on the other end the possibilities are frightening. Jimi was obviously found fully-clothed because the 9 Vesparax hit him like a hammer. And that’s what he was trying to tell Monika.
Thank God there’s other people who intelligently detect Henderson’s subtle suggestions. When I recently re-read Henderson that is the exact thing that came to my head, that he was trying to say something without saying it directly. I guess he was trying not to get sued. Douglas was probably just a hopeful producer who stepped back after Jimi’s murder because he realized the people involved were dangerous. I doubt he had any direct jealousy-based involvement in Jimi’s death. However I’m 100% certain he knows a lot more than he’s saying, so he’s one of many who got away with not telling what they really knew. That’s the real story of Jimi. How many people there were around him who betrayed him out of cowardice. Douglas is one of them. I think what Henderson is really getting at is the three persons mentioned all had some kind of focused pressure on Jimi that night. Burdon and Douglas in a cowardly way, and Jeffery in a murderous one. I assure you Burdon knows the real truth. You can tell just by looking at how he’s been dying to give hints in his books over the years. Douglas high-tailed it to France.
You can’t tell me Scotland Yard couldn’t figure this stuff out. The reason they play dumb is because Jimi was murdered by one of their own Military Intelligence agents and they don’t want that black mark on England. They don’t want Jimi’s body so visibly crucified like the Story Of Jesus on Big Ben for all to see. For goodness sakes a first year criminology student could see through all this, why couldn’t Scotland Yard? The answer is because Jimi was wacked by CIA’s COINTELPRO program using Jeffery’s problems with him as plausible cover. That’s the story here and when you input it everything else, including the unaccountable disinterest by the authorities, all makes sense. Only a true prophet would have such an obviously tragic fate and only get an occassional person interested every year or so.
Buster, I have been trying for decades to put the pieces together and I can say that your explanations are the only ones that give a logical, fact based closure to this.
I was one of the group that believed the “Jeffery/insurance payout (bailout)” was the motive for Jimi’s murder but your simple statement of , “Why would Scotland Yard protect a two-bit scumbag manager lawyer like Jeffery?” was the epiphany I needed… even more so, why would they protect a DEAD Jeffery ? He was just one of the many pawns , albeit an important pawn, in this disgusting web of deceit.
I am very well aware of the world of black ops. Unfortunately, the delusional and ignorant pass the reality of these operations off as being spoken of by “conspiracy theory kooks”, a tactic much like calling someone a racist, used to thwart a discussion by avoiding the facts. There are innumerable books on black ops. As you mentioned, 28 Black Panthers were murdered by these operations (some say Tupac was # 29). Jimi had a FBI file, for Goodness sake, with a bunch of names blacked out so the public will not know who was working on the inside (I wonder how many times Jeffery’s name is written/blacked out in that file).
I guess the world becomes a pretty scary place when you discover that the Easter Bunny does not exist and instead of facing the reality , sticking your head under the covers and pretending all is well is the easiest solution.
Buster, I would love to read some of your other “discussions” with the Internet Turds. Can you direct me to some other blogs that you have participated in ?
Thanks
There’s a dividing line between credibility and uncredibility. The morons on Crosstown Torrents fall on the wrong side of that line and practice the conspiracy theory dismissal you speak of. The storms of history will wash them into the gutters and away to the scummy pools they belong in. They’re ignorant cowards and knowing liars who censor people who defend Jimi. Smarter more knowledgeable persons will realize Jeffery’s use as a pawn is classic of powerful government agency assassinations. They’re too dumb to see that as a member of British Army Military Intelligence Jeffery was one of them and was made offers he couldn’t refuse. If we could bare Jimi’s redacted FBI files we would almost certainly see departments and names as well as code words for FBI entities associated with their CHAOS and COINTELPRO assassination programs. Read Phil Strongman’s book on Lennon and you’ll see experts at deciphering FBI files can see the red flags they are covering with black ink. Just membership on the FBI Security Index alone automatically put you in a dangerous statistical category. That includes Jeffery as well, by the way, who died in a freakish mid air plane crash that was very convenient to the people covering up Jimi’s murder.
“The business killed him(Jimi). I can’t put it any clearer than that.” – Eric Burdon
Bless Eric. Like I said, he’s been giving the best hints he could out of guilt over the years. He’s either trying not to get arrested or killed – or both. I sympathize with him and almost certainly would have done the same thing considering the times and circumstances. It’s easy to judge Eric in hindsight but put yourself in his shoes and consider how easy it was to kill Jimi with impunity and you’ll start to understand why he looked the other way. Eric didn’t kill Jimi, Michael did. But isn’t it a bloody travesty that this stuff like Eric’s quote above is so fucking obvious yet persons like me are banned for pointing it out and there’s no follow-through. It’s simple common sense to see that when you think of who and what the “business” that killed Jimi was that Michael Jeffery is the one who embodied the business end of Jimi. Poor Eric is telling us Jimi was murdered by Jeffery. He just can’t say it directly. God bless him.
Again, Buster, I wish to thank you for your spot on analysis of the events that surround this incredible situation.
I am not British but please stay on the path and keep a stiff upper lip. The fact that you are pissing people off and getting banned tells me that you are doing something right. I am confident in saying that your detractors do not possess the insight, knowledge or intellect that you have exhibited in this arena and their feckless duplicitous manner should only act as a minor inconvenience as you move forward on the “mission”. To say that one has steel in their balls would probably be interpreted by that group as a vulgar insult…enough said.
I will be checking this page periodically in hopes that you continue to post with the intent of keeping the throngs up to date with the events as they unfold.
Bests to you …..
My recent participation on the blog has stirred my to reread several Hendrix books and last night I read a part that I had previously not given proper notice to. It seems that a member of Vanilla Fudge , who happened to be managed by none other than Michael Jeffery, was killed in a suspicious car accident. Upon hearing the news, chills went down Jimi’s spine… he had no doubts who was responsible for the death of this musician.
I tried to search for info on this but came up with ZERO. Is the Fudge guy another feather on Jeffery’s cap ?
I found internet search information on that Vanilla Fudge member a while back but can’t find it now. I’m glad you noticed that. That’s what I’ve been trying to tell people is that Tony Brown was on to a lot more than he said directly. You have to read Brown in the context that he’s putting these things out there with serious intent but letting the reader interpret its meaning. Whatever the exact name of the Vanilla Fudge member was it is very likely that information was gotten to Jimi as a purposeful message. Actually it is even worse than you imagine. The manager of Vanilla Fudge was Phil Basile, a member of the New York Lucchese crime family whom Jeffery associated with. The reason Jimi got scared upon hearing that news is because Basile and Jeffery had kidnapped him in order to send a message. Also, Jimi’s friend Bobby Woods ended up dead on his back on a Queens NY street with his arms crossed across his chest and several bullets in his head. Woods was a bartender at the mafia’s Salvation Club. The same club that Jeffery had taken mob thugs up to Jimi’s house in order to intimidate him into playing at. You can see how right out in the open all this stuff is.
On September 17 Jimi decided all this stuff made Jeffery a bad deal. He called Jeffery’s lawyer Henry Steingarten and told him to sever his ties with Jeffery once and for all. 12 hours later Jimi was found dead under strange circumstances.
My brother Tony Brown also died in 1999 massive heart attack and a whiskey bottle by he’s side
After he wrote he’s last book on Jimi Hendrix he did know loads more what he never put in he’s books but like all the rest it’s gone to he’s grave…someone got to Tony too! I think
We were going to Lanzarote next thing I knew tony was dead…I’ve never wrote anything like this before but reading your blog I feel closer to tony and jimi
Joyce. I’d like to talk to you if possible.
Yes that will be ok
Sent from my iPad
>
Joyce, Contact me
Hi buster could you telephone me please.
@Buster… it was very obvious that Tony Brown knew much more than he published in his book. I’ve always wondered why he left so much open for interpretation (speculation?). Was libel a real and valid concern ? Some feel that Monika poured the wine down Jimi’s pipes but that does not add up. MJ and cohorts seems more likely.
Do you feel that Tappy’s account is the most accurate rendering of the series of events ?
You can tell from the way Tony Brown sets up the information that anyone who had as much knowledge of the case as himself would naturally have drawn further conclusions. That was my one criticism of the book, that Brown could have helped the reader by at least drawing some of those conclusions in public. I sort of did that for him in this thread. You have to understand Monika initiated a vicious libel battle with Kathy just a few years prior, so Brown was probably aware of the potential problems of going too far with his evidence. Plus people like Brown don’t want to appear too aggressive or they’ll lose future interviews. When pushed into a corner on the murder of a famous person people will sue. Unfortunately those people had a great partner in the British government and its non-investigation. Monika appears to have been thrown to the dogs as a scapegoat in order to shut her up. Her death was somewhat predictable considering what would have happened if she were still alive after Tappy’s claim.
There are some serious insiders who feel Monika was the one who murdered Jimi by forcing wine down his throat. I disagree because criminal profiling shows that such a calculated death is not the modus operandi of a shy blond German artist. There was a methodology to that murder that precluded impulsive female reaction. The pills were planned. That kind of planning puts you squarely within the modus operandi of intel. You have to play Sherlock Holmes and look at the evidence. Monika called Burdon shortly after the event to get help. If Monika had murdered Jimi criminal behavior patterns would make it more likely that she would not have brought attention to herself so quickly. If Monika did such a thing she more likely would have let Jimi lie and pretended to find him after waking up herself. Plus, if you look at Monika’s relationship to Jimi she was looking to keep him, not murder him. Forcing wine down someone’s throat while unconscious is, however, the type of covert murder method someone like Michael Jeffery would be familiar with. Plus, if you are sharp you’ll notice Jimi’s body was found on the bed untouched and covered in vomit. This shows that the people who cleaned up the flat knew he was dead. If there was any question of life someone would have tried to save him. The reason Jimi was found that way is because the people who first got to him knew he was dead and there was no point in trying to aid him. Jeffery had a serious motive and means, Monika was the patsy. In the end, the forensic evidence perfectly dovetails with Tappy’s tale. However, if true, Jeffery was clever enough to leave out the fact he got Monika to dose Jimi. Probably in return for Hendrix-access favors. If Jeffery did say that to Tappy, the forensic evidence precludes the pills being shoved down Jimi’s throat by the murderers. Jimi’s barbiturate level showed that the pills had been inside him for about 2 hours.
There is a very real wicked alternative possibility here that Monika was a CIA operative drafted as part of the COINTELPRO program to infiltrate Jimi. However I don’t think she was a directed killer because, if you are sharp, her pattern of giving hints over the years is not what such a person would do. Her pattern is more like a cooperator who was used and did not know the intention of her users. A Mata Hari who infiltrated Jimi and was then used to set him up for murder. CIA had some very bizarre capabilities with those programs I won’t go into here because they are above the heads of the average Crosstown Tyrants feces tossers and mugwumps. Yes, there is a possibility Monika was wicked as they come. That she murdered Jimi under covert orders and later framed Jeffery once he was dead. Jeffery’s business motives could be effectively used as a plausibly deniable reason. So instead of poor innocent Monika being played by Jeffery, it was Jeffery being played by world class Cold War intelligence wolves out for a big political target who threatened their covert banks. But once you realize Jeffery was MI-6 we are talking the same thing and it doesn’t make much difference since they were all part of the same intel cause. Do you see now the tenterhooks the British government hangs on here and why it ignores such obvious evidence?
Patsy is a very interesting term. Do you think the herculean effort of cleaning the murder scene by Burdon, Terry Slater, et al was to keep Monika from becoming the ultimate patsy in the Oswald sense ? Damage control possibly ? Or perhaps Monika was told “Clean this shit up , Bitch, or you’ll be next… ” as MJ exited the Samarkind?
And why do you think Eric, Slater, Wong , etc would help with the clean up and get placed in the middle of a murder ?
And for those of you who disbelieve MK Ultra mind control and the wicked world of intel operatives take note of this video clip. Please remember that what you are about to see is the actual scenario and not a re-encatment
It all depends on what the cleaners knew. They could have been told Jimi OD’ed and just wanted to clean the place of any drug evidence while they strategized a plan. So, once Monika involved them they were the ones who cooked-up the pretend you woke up and found him that way story.
You can see how complex this is because there are so many levels of possibility. If the clean-up crew knew Jimi was murdered then their clean-up takes on more intent of removing evidence and allowing Jeffery to get away in order to relieve any consequences for themselves. Chances are they knew, simply because of their behavior and not speaking about it. After all, with all that’s come out in the last few years you would think there would at least be a comment from those people? Not a peep.
It’s very possible the motivation for the clean-up was to avoid endangering themselves with Jeffery. At that point Monika’s role wasn’t significant. She just happened to be there at the time. Her job then became to stick with her story no matter what. And that’s basically what she did up until the issue finally coming to bear led to her death.
Interesting that Monika said Stickells and Barret were only interested in phone messages and notes from Jeffery. Monika was a bit dizzy because she wrote in her book that only Jimi and her knew about the Samarkand in order to escape the office. So how could there be any phone messages from Jeffery?
Police will not reopen probe on Diana’s death
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/17/probe-princess-diana-death_n_4458205.html
I guess after the results of Jimi’s “reinvestigation” and lack of public outcry from the street theatre duly played by it to the public, Scotland Yard doesn’t even bother to go through the motions anymore….
The governments in question used 9-11 to install the self-serving intelligence agency rogue rule they had enjoyed previously by covert means at the formal level. Which, as you say, saved them the bother of going through the motions and making themselves look bad with corrupted methods and decisions. Now they can just officially ignore you and blow you off. Those rotten governments used the Cold War to install undemocratic military rule with the excuse it was justified by the extremes of potential nuclear war. As history shows, once those powers are taken they are not given back because those who benefit from them are not going to give up their conveniences, even if there is no longer any enemy to apply them towards.
Jimi’s case is much more provable. At some point Scotland Yard must be made to answer for its obvious failures in the Hendrix murder.
The definitive book. Fact driven and irrefutable proof.
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/9-11-synthetic-terror-webster-griffin-tarpley/1111872967
Billy Cox was shot ? According to Monika he was … Check out this interview with her, at 10:30 she states that two people were killed by Jeffries and Billy Cox was shot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJBsegg766k
If this is, indeed, true, what are the details of Billy being shot ?
Monika’s language difficulty may have made her say ‘shot’ when she meant ‘dosed’. The two people Jeffery murdered were likely Devon and maybe Bobby Woods. Or perhaps Monika meant Devon and Jimi?
If you pay attention Monika slipped and told the real time she dropped Jimi at Kameron’s – midnight. She had told everyone else 1:30am. She also slipped and said 9am for her wake up time. This was one of the three times she had given over her various stories of 9 – 10:20 and 11.
If you’re a clever detective like I am you’ll notice Monika starts saying “They should have cut his…” and then abruptly stops and regathers her words. If you are sharp you’ll understand that when Monika was thinking about a tracheostomy she was about to say “They should have cut his throat”. Listen to the clip. The reason she abruptly stopped is because it was too close to the truth and gave her a nervous reaction that made her search for different words. Monika couldn’t bring herself to say “They should have cut his throat”.
Buster, is this the interview that she did with Caesar that you have often referred to ?
Good question. No, I don’t think it is. I’ve heard the Caesar radio show recording and I’m pretty sure it’s different than this one. So I think this one is an unknown interview on a different show from the same time period because she basically tells the same story she told Caesar. To show how dirty the powers that be are and how much CIA controls things you can’t find the Caesar show recording on the internet any more even though it used to be available. And that pig Caesar is probably keeping it under wraps because it makes Monika look bad. You can contact the guy who posted it, Richard Anthony, but he’s mainly oriented towards his weird publication that promotes the theory Monika did it with poisoned wine.
“…And that pig Caesar…” Amen,a turd on the same level as Fender’s Finger. These people seem to dedicate their lives to the memory of Jimi but instead of searching for truth, clarification and justice they are determined to paint a picture of the events that led to Jimi’s demise in their preconceived vision(version) as opposed to logically interrupting the facts as they unfold.
I can not understand Caesar’s motive nor how he gets away with his own special brand of Yellow Journalism.
Totally reprehensible…
…plus, was Billy’s dosing an intentional sabotage or just a byproduct of the times as backstage drink spiking was commonplace in that era?
Good question. I’m not sure because, like most things involved with this, there’s too little information and the people involved aren’t talking. But, Meromeri, remember that Jeffery was probably successful in breaking Buddy Miles away from Jimi with acid at the Madison Square Garden moratorium concert. Jeffery was trying to force Jimi back into the Experience with Noel on bass because that was his money maker he could control. So I would not be shocked if Jeffery played his usual tricks and dosed Billy. However, also remember Billy was around rehearsing at the Catskills house when Jeffery did his mafia intimidation and was a first hand witness to Jimi being spooked about it. If you think about it Billy was one of Jimi’s best friends so naturally Jimi probably voiced his fears to Billy. So even if it was a random spiking it hit Billy broadside right when he was already stressed about Jeffery and probably sparked a paranoia that was already brewing in Billy anyway. I’m pissed at Billy because he could help Jimi by clearing this up but he doesn’t talk about it. Hey, thanks for helping Jimi Billy. What I’ve come to figure out lately is that Jimi was also probably spiked that night as well but had a harder head for acid and rode it out. That bad acid could explain some of Jimi’s weird behavior during those final days. This whole thing fascinates me because there’s an epic opera here that needs to be figured out to do justice for Jimi. I’m just being figurative when I say opera because I consider this a serious cause for a real hero and brother of mine who is calling us from the grave like Hamlet. This discussion belongs on Crosstown Torrents but the cowardly British-oriented scumbags have censored it under that cowardly tyrant ‘Fender’s Fingers’.
Billy, Terry Slater, BuddyMiles (RIP), Judy Wong , etc can shed light on this but after almost 44 years are seeming scared of the forces to be.
Sorry to inform you Judy Wong rip 2005 and Terry Slater rip 2008.
I figure Caesar does it because his magazine depends on information from surviving Hendrix people. And as we have shown, most of them, unfortunately, are holding back on Jimi in order to cover their cowardly asses. That’s why I’m in this business because Jimi created a perfect storm of fame that was just big enough for all those involved to justify their betrayal. As far as Crosstown Tyrants, they are a weird mix of idiots, degenerate creeps, smug Hendrix aficionados, and an obvious core of British-based members who control their bias in a British-type of censoring way on an American website. This is because the owner “Pat”, whose, as far as I can tell, main qualification is being a Hawks fan, is a numbnuts whose main interest is probably Hendrix computer geekery. He has no intellectual integrity whatsoever that would qualify him as the overseer of the internet’s main Hendrix site. So those British bastards get away with censoring the murder topic on his site. The result is the remaining content is moronic and only serves the cowardly needs of fans wanting to grab free Hendrix souvenirs. Eventually we’ll have to form a free site to counter it I guess. What gets me the most is some of those Crosstown creeps know what I posted is true but still troll it. Or the fools who pose their stupidity as being the best course for Jimi. That’s good because that’s the evil sector I wanted to handle personally. As far as Caesar, in traditional fables those who betray the object of their interest so badly usually suffer some kind of befitting fate.
Rolling Stone Magazine’s headline for Jimi’s stamp, “Going Postal”, is derogatory. The best way to describe what is wrong with Jimi’s stamp is that it is a cartoon. Jimi wasn’t a cartoon, man. Part of the reason Jimi’s murder isn’t being investigated is because of this weird indirect political/racist bias against Jimi where he isn’t quite taken seriously or given the mainstream attention, like with the evidence for his murder, that rock stars of his stature would be given. All society has proven, and even major rock publications, is that you can praise Jimi while murdering him at the same time. That in itself is what Jimi stood for and why he is special and important. Dig? That’s what you need staring back at you from a Hendrix stamp, not some piss yellow-toned psychedelic mush.
I just got a couple of sheets today. The only this uglier than the stamp is the picture of Jimi on the back side of the stamp sheet … or maybe the Band of Gypsys cover.
Iam very
rsIam very surprised that an earlier entry of mine on this subject was somehow omitted over a period of years.It dealt with the fact that the British government shut down it’s Forensic Science Division citing funding.At that time the Director of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (Dr.Buono) was extremely critical of this decision.Meanwhile all conscious individuals should continue their efforts to produce justice in this matter.
Over on Crosstown Tyrants the poster Ezy Ryder opened a thread asking what would be your biggest regret regarding Jimi? The responses started off by mentioning songs people wished Jimi had done live. The poster Pali Gap then wrote: “Well apart from the obvious, I wish he hadn’t taken that fatal overdose in Sept 1970.” Pali Gap’s profile shows he’s from London. You have to understand that English fans are generally in denial that Jimi was murdered and don’t want to admit their hero was subjected to a wicked death by Englishmen. As all the real evidence shows, Jimi did not take a fatal dose. He took a borderline lethal dose, according to the manufacturer, and didn’t have enough time to overdose. Nor would his famous tolerance for barbiturates allow him to overdose from such a borderline dose.
The poster Purplehazechild them chimes-in that he wished Jimi had never met Monika Dannemann. If Purplehazechild is trying to say Jimi was murdered he doesn’t give enough detail. But rest assured Purplehazechild holds back because the site is hostile towards people who speak the truth and attacks them. Crosstown Tyrants has no problem allowing people to suggest Jimi died a way that he provably did not. It’s only when you can intelligently argue the evidence that they take action. Anyone who defends Jimi will be banned.
Mourningstar then chimes-in with one of his ass-kissing inanities. He’s a suck-up of the worst sort and will enter the cowardly evasion he does in order to serve the site bulls. His input is obviously guided by his cowardice over telling the truth. He doesn’t care if these people are in cowardly denial of Jimi’s murder as long as he can post.
Uncle Cami then adds the best example of the site’s duplicitous orientation. He says: “Wouldn’t have mattered. He would have died anyway, I believe. He was reckless.” This is the popular Caesar Glebbeek blaming-the-victim canard. It’s a cowardly, condescending attempt to pose Jimi as some kind of ignorant colored man who didn’t know what he was doing and killed himself. Uncle Cami and Caesar are people who will allow Jimi to be the subject of their great fanhood but pity him at the same time. No intelligent discussion of how Jimi’s problems were directly attributable to Michael Jeffery will ever come from them. This is a completely acceptable opinion on Crosstown Tyrants that gets not one peep of protest from the ignoratti who attend it.
Poster deek57 chimes-in blaming Monika. These people know there’s something wrong, but they blame Monika. The evidence I showed proving Jeffery did it isn’t even registered by these dumb-asses. It bounces off their thick heads.
The poster karsten then blames Jimi, saying his death was a repeat of other similar reckless barbiturate use Jimi did in that last month. Karsten is yet another poster who ignores the evidence for murder in the autopsy data that disproves accidental overdose. These preferred Crosstown members can literally be shown the evidence yet they ignore it and proffer their idiotic, dumbed-down version. These people are in denial Michael Jeffery murdered Jimi. They are saying Jimi himself and the Vesparax did it, even though it is provably untrue if you practice a level of analysis above the moronic one they practice.
Pali Gap then adds that he doesn’t think Monika did it, that it was an accident. Sure, an accident with lungs bursting with wine. These people just ignore Michael Jeffery’s motives and incriminating behavior.
Mourningstar asks if Monika wasn’t to blame why would she kill herself?
Purple Jim responds with the wholly disingenuous answer that Monika killed herself over depression from losing the court case against Kathy. These Crosstown deniers always seek the quickest, easiest excuse and don’t involve any of the incriminating evidence that shows otherwise. You must keep to the moronic dumbed-down script on Crosstown. Nothing else is allowed.
Purple Jim is a notorious gatekeeper and liar on the subject. He has a dishonest web page where he mocked me as being a crazy conspiracy theorist. Of course he never honestly discussed any of my evidence nor does his page allow comments. That is a typical Crosstown playing field. Mocking denial with no ability to respond. Caesar practices the same thing. You don’t see those lying cowards show up here where they would have to defend their ignorance and stupidity. The British coward Fender’s Fingers, with his attack dog avatar, makes sure the site is cleansed of anyone who can factually argue the murder evidence. The owner Pat Peterson prefers it that way. I don’t know who Peterson is or his background but how he came to be the controller of this subject needs to be reviewed. I think most of the posters on Crosstown are either cowardly or stupid. However I suspect there’s a small percentage of them who know Jimi was murdered and post disinformation for political reasons. Peterson is their welcoming host.
How did those assholes ever get in control of the prevailing Hendrix community opinion on Jimi’s death? What kind of cowards does Jimi have as fans?
http://crosstowntorrents.org/showthread.php?20792-If-Hendrix-only-your-biggest-regrets
It is rather bizarre how they stubbornly refuse to even consider new scientifically based evidence. The Herd Mentality is a signature trait of the WASP culture.
I am very disappointed in the non-action of Gerry Stickells, Tony Slater, Mitch and Billy Cox. Billy’s mental and physical state at the time of the tragedy could be a valid excuse though. I wouldn’t be surprised if he actually mentally blocked the entire episode.
And the other three, being English, might possibly be(been) in the same crosshairs as Jimi. So, their silence may possibly be out of self preservation rather than indifference towards Jimi.
Janie’s indifference is really the most troubling. She has the time , money and connections to find out the truth … she may possibly know the truth. I guess the ringing of the cash register inspires her to leave well enough alone.
The Crosstown site’s members are basically computer nerds of the MP-3 culture and probably Hendrix collectors who have been around long enough to be the names in the business. They’ve learned to get along you don’t get hung up on things like Jimi’s murder because it will draw heat to their purpose, which isn’t doing justice for Jimi as his fans but is instead sucking as much as you can get out of him for their own benefit. The theme of that site is internet piracy, not responsibility for Jimi’s murder. It’s a weird mix and Jimi tends to attract a lesser educated peer group of pot smokers who won’t wreck their high hurting their dull brains with things like evidence. Some of them are moronic enough to scold people like me that investigating Jimi’s death is something that does disservice to his memory when the obvious reason they are doing it is because it is easier for them. Pretty dumb. The other group are the professionals to whom the dummies look when they need an opinion on things like this. Those professionals are smart enough to know Jimi was murdered. Some of them even knew it then. They qualify for a particular level of weaseldom because they just lay low and either repeat the official story or avoid the issue all together. These people are afraid because they know they won’t last long in the industry if they speak the truth. I know what you mean about WASP culture but this sort of thing goes beyond ethnicity, though I will say the worst deniers of Jimi’s murder are brits. They obviously don’t want to admit the unavoidable British consequences of this.
The people you mentioned bought time from the fact Monika made a plausible story of a drug overdose and seeing how that was at least possible people accepted it. Some of them knew Jeffery murdered Jimi. Being of a powerless counter-culture they simply stayed quiet seeing how the authorities were not interested and would probably not help anyway. Most of Jimi’s peers were partying and staying away from the cops, so there wasn’t much they were going to do either. Rock was a rogue culture. It was on its own. It was taken advantage of by all those concerned. Jeffery was alive and a dangerous bastard. He had just neutralized a Security Index target so intel was going to cover him. Yes, those other 3 had things to worry about seeing what happened to Jimi. And with Jimi’s fans being so dumb, like the idiots on Crosstown, who was going to listen? By the way, there’s a good chance some of those attackers of the evidence are intelligence agents.
Yeah, Janie is probably a person whose personality isn’t prone to proactive pursuit of evidence and legal justice. Though she doesn’t seem to hesitate when it comes to lawyering-up to protect her Hendrix interests. Being a business minded person she probably knows when she’s taking on a system that isn’t going to let her win. When you prove the British Government consciously covered-up Jimi’s murder the liability aspects are huge, so they aren’t going to be trapped by their own law. By the way, I think she already made a public statement saying the way Jimi died and the official story are two different things.
Buster, please excuse me if you have already spoken on this but how does the Bobby Woods’ hit play into all of this , if at all?
And on a completely different topic, I highly doubt Eric Clapton’s tale of seeing Jimi at the Sly Stone concert the night of his death. As far as I know, Jimi was scheduled to jam with Sly but Clapton is the only person that states that Jimi attended the Family Stone concert.
Probably mistaken identity.
Agreed ?
Your guess is as good as mine on Bobby Wood, however I strongly suspect his knowledge of Jeffery’s relationship to his mob bosses at the Salvation had something to do with it. Figure it out. Wood was Jimi’s best friend at the Salvation, was a loose cannon, and had a reputation for having loose lips (not a good trait to have in the mob).
Why Clapton said that has yet to be figured out. All the known accounts never mention Jimi stopping by the Lyceum to see the Sly concert.
The owner of Crosstown Torrents is Pat Peterson. If you look at his Facebook page he’s a hockey jock and ex-Navy. An interesting thing to note on his Facebook page are the images of NRA and gun-rights links. He’s a right-winger and gun nut. If you could choose a person whom you would not want in charge of the internet’s only major Hendrix site it would be him. He smells spooky and could be a intel agent or person under their control (or politically oriented), which explains the lack of tolerance of discussion of Jimi’s murder on that site. That guy should never be allowed to run the internet’s only Hendrix site. His background fully explains the totally un-Hendrix bully manner in which that site is run.
Robbie Radio posted Joe Viglione’s article on Buzzy Linhart’s witnessing of Devon Wilson’s saying Jimi was murdered. Typical of the trolls that dominate Crosstown Torrents “Ezy Rider” came on and gave a one-line answer saying it wasn’t credible. Viglione’s article is actually very credible and shows good evidence towards Jimi’s murder. Ezy Rider is just following the enforced line of stupidity on Crosstown where ALL murder discussion is shunned and not credible. The extreme travesty of this is the fact that Ezy Rider, while assuming a position of credibility, is actually the one who isn’t credible. There’s a lot of discussion that should follow in that thread that won’t because of the level of fascist intimidation imposed by the gun nut site owner Pat Peterson and his capo moderators. If you post intelligent information showing that posters like Ezy Rider are just moronic shills knee-jerking dislike you’ll be descended upon quickly by the degenerate thugs who run that site. And run it in favor of those who would cover-up and conceal Jimi’s murder for their own purposes.
That site should be boycotted out of existence. The Jimi treasures it offers should be given back and the owner should be told what to do with them if it comes at the poisonous price of backing Jimi’s murderers. It disgusts me to see the cowards who embody that site giving in to the deal that they’ll get their Hendrix goodies as long as they consent to the right-wing agenda Crosstown enforces. No poster dares answer that thread honestly because they know what will happen to them under Mr Peterson’s draconian rule. It disgusts me to see the membership consists of cowardly creeps who are willing to sell out Jimi in order to be members.
You present a very compelling argument mate. I’ve been playing guitars for 30 years and like all metal heads, I cut my teeth on old school blues like Jimi before moving onto Black Sabbath etc. I’ve never been pro-guns, in fact quite the opposite as in the former Yugoslavia where my parents came from, Serbia ranks second to the USA for “gun nuts” per capita (58% – the USA a whopping 97%!) and has a lot to do with the multi-factorial reasons that destroyed the old Yugoslavia. That site is boycotted. You’ve convinced me. F that site forever. Maybe I’ll create an account there just to troll it in my spare time, haha ;)
Buster, can you give a link to the Viglione interview?
There’s an evil oppression on that site over discussing Jimi’s murder. That’s why there’s only one stupid response where the poster Ezy Rider pretends to have credibility, entering a negative comment while dismissing the subject. The real truth is the site is occupied by some incredible dumb-asses herd-driven by some dark people in control who intimidate and ban anyone who tries to enter into intelligent discussion of the evidence. Any smart person can see Ezy Rider is just a creep who is only capable of scoffing “not credible” while being totally unable to discuss the finer, more subtle things Buzzy’s witnessing entails:
http://crosstowntorrents.org/showthread.php?22082-Buzzy-Linhart-Talks-About-Jimi
Incredible info….I’ve never read this stuff before tonight. Not much mention of the wine, though.
There was never wine to begin with….that is why.
There’s a shiny brand new user called ‘Electric Lady’ on crosstown and VoodooChild starts off with a good post for ‘Ted Nugent – Like I Needed Another Reason To Not Like This Guy’ (actually I like some of his music, Stranglehold is a good rolly polly bluesy track for instance, but VoodooChild is right about The Nuge when it comes to opinions) and then Renemies chimes in with “I don’t see anything wrong with what he’s saying. Jimi’s drug use is why he died”. Looks like ElectricLady is going to have to wise him up about Mike Jeffery and what really happened. We’ll see what comes of this when “her” account is approved, and I’m finished travelling to Kiev and central Ukraine over the next week…
The thread’s not that old, so it’s 1st troll on the list :)
http://crosstowntorrents.org/showthread.php?21775-Ted-Nugent-Like-I-Needed-Another-Reason-To-Not-Like-This-Guy
correction – VoodooChild = jeffmason
I see that there are rankings according to how long you’ve been a member…
If you want to understand the evil nature of that site and how it is run by enemies of Jimi (possibly intel) just sign-up and try to tell the truth about the evidence behind Jimi’s murder and watch what happens to you.
Regret to inform that Arthur Allen – one of the Allen Twins and Jimi Hendrix’s Harlem friend from the Ghetto-Fighters has died of fibrotic lung disease. He changed his name to Tunde Ra Aleem years ago.
It’s worth a shot Buster. Can’t let ’em grind ya down. But your posts and Justins great article have galvanised me into action. I’m used to getting my ass banned on IRC. We’ll see how it goes, haha.
Yes RIP TRA
http://www.soultracks.com/story-tunde-ra-aleem-dies
Although Jimi is not mentioned in this piece there are several striking similarities between his murder and Michael Jackson’s murder. Reasons, the people behind it, the patsy, etc etc
Check it out …
http://mindcontrolblackassassins.com/category/earl-woods/
In their new book ‘Ghetto Fighters In Harlem World’ the Allen Twins made a startling revelation about a witnessing Albert Allen had at Electric Lady Studios. It was Albert Allen who was napping on the couch at Electric Lady when he overheard a conversation between Monika Dannemann and Michael Jeffery. When he jumped-up to announce his presence he saw the famous Samarkand garden photos of Jimi from September 17th laid out on Jeffery’s desk. Included in those photos were two photos of Jimi Hendrix laying on the bed at the Samarkand Hotel obviously dead. Dannemann became the center of a nasty controversy that involved her suing Hendrix bass guitar player Noel Redding for questioning her doings the morning Jimi died. Dannemann had insisted to the authorities that Jimi was alive when he was taken away in the ambulance at 11:30am. When the ambulance men were finally located and questioned in 1992 they came up with a different story saying no one as present at the Hotel and Jimi was obviously dead. What Albert Allen witnessed was proof of that.
I can confirm what Buster is saying to be 100% correct. And there has been buzz about Albert’s witnessing for many years. Also, in 1996 Albert confronted Monika via phone about the pictures and Monika did not deny it and within a week, Monika kissed her own arse goodbye from the world.
Buster,
This part of the article above, specifically the quote by Roger Pomphrey, provides intrigue:
“When I made my documentary there were a couple of people who claimed, offcamera, that Monika was in New York two weeks after Jimi died, and who heard her in close conversation with Mike Jeffery.”
I think you know what I’m getting at here.
It could just be the original mistaken memory being repeated to Pomphrey. I know Monika was in New York in February 1971. In any case the precise date matters not. It makes sense to me that this new date of 2 weeks later attests to bad memories since it now varies with the “day of Jimi’s death” version told of in the book. Safe to say it was probably Feb ’71.
Hey Buster,
Stop me if I’m wrong on this one. I’m going back to this quote:
” Dr Bannister had never entered any statement on record about the wine.”
That’s understandable, since he was the ‘Surgical Registrar’ on duty that day, Sept. 18, 1970 at the St. Mary Abbotts Hospital. Which leads to the obvious question. Would it not be the job of the ‘Medical Registrar’ to enter that information on record about the wine? And wasn’t the ‘Medical Registrar’ the same guy (Dr. Seifert) that gave two different stories about Jimi’s medical condition?
Think maybe Seifert may have been gotten to and blatantly omitted the wine from his report at that time? We know he lied about it later and said he didn’t see any signs of alcohol. And how do we know that? Because there was a 3rd doctor named Bob Brown and he states Jimi had “too much to drink” and that can be seen in this article right here:
http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/music/about-that-jimi-hendrix-death-business/story-e6frfn09-1226385575798
And just what would make Bob Brown think Jimi had too much to drink? But of course, the very same red wine Dr. Bannister witnessed.
Yet the dumb-asses on Crosstown Torrents back Seifert and trash Bannister. Unfortunately Brown said that in 2012 so the deniers will just say that he read that later and just repeated it. This whole problem originates from Seifert and Bannister thinking it was just an unfortunate case of drug and alcohol misadventure and never considering foul play. By the time Dr Teare got Jimi for autopsy the critical forensic element of the wine was gone and not represented in the forensic figuring. The covert murder method had worked perfectly, up until people started asking questions years later.
But, as we know, UPI reporter Jack Meehan spoke with Gavin Thurston (the coroner) on Sept. 29, 1970, one day after the Inquest concluded, and Thurston told Meehan that Jimi was “imbibed by red wine” — totally backing Bannister and Brown’s statements. Crosstown can deny all they want, but it don’t change reality and all they’re doing is urinating on their own heads and telling themselves it is raining.
This is a lie and is not true. Jack Meehan never spoke with Gavin Thurston about “imbibed wine” since there was never any massive wine in Hendrix. Sharon Lawrence wrote in her phony book that this account took place and gave a second hand quote from Meehan about Thurston. This is not credible evidence and there is no record of this meeting ever taking place. Since Hendrix had to wine in his body as claimed this was proven to be a lie. I debunked this whole phony claim in the comments from August 21, 2019 that are below in a 3 Part Series. This is a fake and false quote you use to promote your phony “Hendrix wine murder”. This has been debunked.
That of course is a checkmate that destroys the human scum Crosstown poster stplsd and all the other morons who said there was no proof of the wine. That is proof, if Monika’s admission of the wine wasn’t. What the cowards at Crosstown do is pull the chessboard out from underneath you and ban you when you prove the evidence they are in denial of.
That’s right. I’ve seen the the poster stplsd’s ridiculous posts over there and he clearly comes across as a dog with rabies, chasing it’s own tail, as do the others.
Some of the statements regarding Jimi’s condition (on September 18th 1970) are described graphically, so be prepared…
John Saua was one of the ambulance crew (2 men) who answered the call to 22 Landsdowne Crescent, London on the 18th September 1970. The call came in at 11:18 A.M. They arrived at 11:27 AM. John had only worked with Reg Jones for one month, as Reg Jones’ regular partner was in the hospital. John left that position shortly afterword and had no contact with Reg Jones since, nor were they particularly good mates at the time, being of different age groups. John still is an ambulance man.
John Saua’s Statement:
Well, I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out, I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it. The aspirators in those days were all right, but not like you have today. They couldn’t shift that lot.
We knew it was hopeless. There was no pulse, no respiration. We got down to the flat and there was nobody but the body on the bed, we had to radio for the police from the van, and we couldn’t touch anything in the flat. As I say we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed, but I didn’t recognize him. I don’t know if any anybody would’ve recognized him. His own mother wouldn’t have recognized him. He was in a pool of vomit, it was everywhere.
But we are not doctors and it’s our job to keep trying till we get them to the hospital. We can’t proclaim anyone dead…so as soon as the police arrived we were off. I was in the back with Jimi, Reg Jones drove. When we moved him the gasses were gurgling. You get that when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant. The vomit was all the way down. We couldn’t have got an airway down. He was flat on his back when we got there. It’s a shame he wasn’t on his side because he might have pulled through.
Questions for John Saua:
.
Q: Did you sit Jimi up in the ambulance?
A: Of course not, but I really kept on trying to do what I could for him even though we knew it was useless. I was really sorry there was nothing we could do to help.
Q: Why have you never talked to the press or come forward?
A: What do you mean come forward? I would never talk to the press, well you can’t in our job. We sign a conditions of service agreement. If we go into a building of national security, or a member of the royal family or a celebrity, we can’t talk about it, and quite right too. No one has ever asked me about it before anyway.
{John was then shown the account in the bio “Electric Gypsy” regarding Jimi’s death.}
A: Well that’s fiction isn’t it? What a load of old cobblers!
Q: Don’t you remember this girl (Monika Dannemann)?
A: No.
Q: Surely you remember this girl. Blond hair and a German accent.
A: Sorry, doesn’t jar anything or ring any bells with me.
Q: Did you speak to anyone on your way to the hospital?
A: Just the police before we left. A small crowd may have gathered. I can’t remember if some one asked what was happening, but you always get a crowd round an ambulance. It’s an unfortunate fact.
Q: Did anyone ride along to the hospital with you?
A: No, of course not, like who?
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Reg Jones was the other member of the ambulance crew who responded to a “possible O.D.” call at the 22 Landsowne crescent basement flat on the 18th of September 1970. He had worked for over 20 years as an ambulance man and has the highest reputation among his colleagues.
Reg Jones’ Statement:
Well it was horrific. We arrived at the flat and the door was flung wide open. Nobody about, just the body on the bed. He was covered in vomit. There was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was. His airways was completely blocked all the way down. His tongue had fallen back you see. The room at first was dark…we had to pull the curtains.
Well we had to get the police. We only had an empty flat, so John Saua ran up and radioed and got the aspirator too. We felt for any pulse between his shoulders, pinched his earlobes and nose, showed a light in his eyes, but there was no response at all. I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. You get a feel for it, I can’t explain, but you do and I knew he was dead.
Once the police arrived, which seemed like no time at all, we got him off to the hospital as quick as we could. We just kept trying. My shirt was wringing wet. The ambulances in them days, they wasn’t equipped like they are now. We had them crazy wadhams (a type of ambulance) in them days, awful they was.
We took him to St. Mary Abbotts, they don’t have a casualty ward now, but in them days they did. That was our designated hospital for the day. There was a “bed state”* at St. Charles. You found out at the beginning of your shift what your designated hospital was – St. Mary’s was the designated that day.
[*NOTE: A “bed state” meant that the casualty ward for a particular hospital was not open on a particular day – either through staffing or lack of beds, the designated hospital was the place the injured, or ill, would receive the fastest and most comprehensive care. Just to make sure the emergency services remembered, large highly visible colored disks were placed at the casualty entrance. Red was for closed and green meant open. St. Charles was marginally closer, but there was a “bed state” and, as Reg Jones said, St. Mary’s was the designated casualty ward that day.]
Questions for Reg Jones:
Q: Did any one come along in the Ambulance with you?
A: No. John Saua was with Jimi, I didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix, bit out of my age group, luv. When we got him to the hospital, full lights and sirens, we had to clean the ambulance out, it was really a mess, his bowels and bladder, all that goes when you’re dead. That flat must have needed a good cleaning too.
Q: Did you sit him up in the ambulance?
A: Sit him up! No luv, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked. Them steps up the flat was steep, and you had a natural incline on the way up, but no, he wasn’t sat up.
Q: Did you see or talk to anyone in the flat or on the way?
A: Just the police and the hospital staff.
Q: What about the German girl?
A: What German Girl? We didn’t talk to no one but the police, and then at the hospital.
Q: This is a bit confusing – look at this (shown the account in the “Electric Gypsy” bio:
A: Well that’s just crazy that is. I wouldn’t know that girl if she was living next door to me. I’ve never seen her before. That’s wicked that is. I’ve lived long enough to know silly tongues will wag, but that is wicked. She wasn’t there, there was no one there.
Q: Have you ever had a situation like this before or since?
A: Well no, that’s why I can remember it quite well, just the body and no one around
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Good on you Scott. Now after absorbing what you wrote consider that the main European Hendrix archivist Caesar Glebbeek put out a publication in 2011 saying all this testimony is nonsense and that he had gathered the real facts. Glebbeek then offered some very clumsily put together retractions and reversals of these statements without any dates or verifying information to support them. It is very likely Glebbeek either fabricated those retractions or unquestioningly printed the retractions of people trying to cover up. It just goes to show what dunderheads the general Hendrix community are that they would not only fail to react to such treason from such a notable Hendrix source, but then go along with it in order to justify their indifference. I’ve never seen such a popular figure as Jimi with such cowardly idiotic fans. The epitome of this is the website Crosstown Torrents run by ex-Navy gun enthusiast Pat Peterson. The reason these people openly discourage the murder topic is because they are a bunch of degenerate scum who only seek to grab Jimi’s treasure by the easiest means while kicking Jimi himself out into the snow. It’s easy to detect scumbags who are only seeking that which confuses and makes uncertain for self-serving purposes of not caring, rather than seeking the just as easily-findable murder evidence. These people have succeeded in dominating the Hendrix community. You would be surprised who they are. Some of them are main names in the Hendrix world.
This is a war, man. One that Jimi was fighting for the children of the world and you. If you come up on the wrong side of this beware because I’m going to come after you with a blade of truth and I promise you if you took sides against Jimi as a Hendrix person you are not going to fare well. To allow this farce of Hendrix fan stupidity and betrayal to exist unchallenged is a rogue insult to Jimi that must have justice done against it. Jimi never intended for his fans to be feckless morons who turned against himself and those defended him. Caesar has to pay for lying about the evidence and saying Jimi was stupid, as do those who accepted his betrayal and looked the other way. Anyone who looks at that testimony and doesn’t conclude Jimi was murdered is going after Jimi for his murderers and they have to be treated as such.
Quite correct. I’ve never seen a casualty in the last century smeared as badly as Jimi Hendrix. And a great majority of the people around him didn’t care.
Scott Thompson missed the part where Reginal Jones confirmed Jimi choked to death on vomit and wasn’t drowned in wine.
OK, here we go, Buster. Now’s the time for us to take the conversation to a new level for the new year.
What I posted before was from Tony Brown’s book JIMI HENDRIX: THE FINAL DAYS (1997), and I copied it from Michael Fairchild’s rockprophecy site because my own photocopy of the book is at a drummer friend’s house. Everybody on this conversational thread needs to read Brown’s book and Kathy Etchingham’s THROUGH GYPSY EYES: MY LIFE, THE 60s, AND JIMI HENDRIX (1999).
Today, however, we go to the heart of the matter.
Most people in this conversation know that Monika Dannemann’s various stories about the last 24 hours of Jimi Hendrix are full of lies, untruths, and lots of misinformation. That said, I believe that she has slipped in some important facts in the book she wrote just before she supposed committed suicide, THE INNER WORLD OF JIMI HENDRIX (St. Martin’s Press, 1995). I not only read her book, but also photocopied large portions of it. It was Buster who directed me back to pp. 164-165, where we find the following passage:
“Jimi had made up his mind that he was definitely going to break up with his manager. It was a difficult decision for him, especially as he knew that a lot of his unreleased music could fall into Mike Jeffery’s hands, which was exactly what he feared the most – that someone else would meddle with his music. So this decision was a real sacrifice for Jimi, as he was sure that Jeffery would alter some of his music to make it more commercial and marketable. However, having gone through such a long and difficult period with his manager – he had suffered threats, blocking of his new albums, and the creation of a false image through being told what to do and how to appear in public – Jimi felt this was the only way out of a disastrous situation. […] Jimi picked up the telephone and asked me to listen carefully to what he had to say to his lawyer, Henry Steingarten. He came straight to the point, telling his lawyer that he wanted to leave Jeffery for good, no mater what the cost might be. Steingarten, who was in partnership with Jeffery’s lawyer, asked Jimi if he had thought about the consequences, without making clear exactly what he meant by this. Jimi answered firmly that he had, and told his lawyer to proceed with his instruction.”
If this is indeed true, as I intuitively believe it is, then we have a clear reason why Jefferey would have wanted to take vengeance.
In their book HENDRIX: SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT (1992), Kramer and McDermott quote Bob Levine (pp. 287-288, quoted in one of my earlier posts above) saying”I had spoken to people who saw him at a party Track Records had staged in London the night before Hendrix died.”
We also have the allegation revealed by James ‘Tappy’ Wright in his ROCK ROADIE (2010) that Jeffery told Wright he had had Hendrix killed, which Bob Levine and others vehemently deny.
So now, let’s look at just these pieces of the puzzle:
1. The statements of the ambulance drivers quoted by both Brown and Etchingham.
2. The recent statements of both Tappy Wright (albeit made within the context of a jokey book full of purposely amusing anecdotes) about Jeffery’s confession, and Bannister’s recent statements regarding the amount of red wine found in Jimi’s lungs.
3. Monika Dannemann’s narrative regarding Jimi firing Mike Jeffery as Manager.
4. Bob Levine’s statements that Jeffery had been seen in London just before Jimi ‘died’, and that Jeffery had lied about not knowing that Jimi was dead (see my prior post quoting from the Kramer & McDermott book).
These pieces of a puzzling situation indicate – at least to me – that we are not just dealing here with a wild conspiracy theory. Hendrix did have an FBI file, and that file is now public property and online. Jeffery was involved in the intelligence world. Eric Burdon, who obviously knows more than he has revealed, has told us plenty about Jeffery in his two autobiographies.
I myself interviewed Buzzy Linhart (who plays vibes on “Drifting” and was a dear friend of Jimi) back in 2011, and Buzzy told me the same story about a person (whom Linhart would not name) who had overhead a conversation between Jeffery and Dannemann in the Electric Ladyland studio. I didn’t really know what to make of the story, and now I see from these posts that it may indeed have been Albert Allen who was sleeping on the couch.
My intuition tells me that this is true, but that is all I can say.
Buster, you and I have communicated on this material before, and you mentioned that you interview Wright and were disappointed. What is the status of the feud between Wright and Levine?
It is my opinion, Ladies & Gentlemen, that if we take all these points into consideration and really look at all the available literature, we can easily come to the conclusion that JIMI HENDRIX DID NOT O.D. ON HEROIN. MONIKA WAS NOT IN THE ROOM WHEN THE AMBULANCE DRIVERS ARRIVED. NOR WAS ERIC BURDON. THERE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN A LARGE AMOUNT OF UNDIGESTED RED WINE IN JIMI’S LUNGS. JEFFERY WAS AT LEAST SEEN IN LONDON AT A TIME HE WAS SAID TO HAVE BEEN ELSEWHERE. JIMI ALLEGEDLY FIRED JEFFERY THE DAY HE ‘DIED’. ONE EMPLOYEE OF JEFFERY CLAIMS JEFFERY CONFESSED TO A MURDER.
These points may or may not prove conclusively that Jimi Hendrix was murdered, but they are strong enough circumstantial evidence to make opening this investigation AN ABSOLUTE NECESSITY.
Happy New Year all of you.
And don’t forget to listen to Jimi Hendrix. His Spirit cannot die. It is here in his music, and it is here in the midst of those who are searching for the truth about why he was taken from us.
I mean it’s pretty obvious already. If this evidence wasn’t proof enough alone the unaccountable lack of any reaction to it by the main witnesses should be.
You need to read ‘Ghetto Fighters In Harlem World’ where Albert Allen recounts overhearing Monika and Jeffery at Electric Lady.
Bob Levine is currently in a nursing home and should be left alone accordingly. There was never any real feud between Levine and Wright. They were amicable friends throughout that whole business. Just two sunshine boys covering their asses and protecting their Hendrix status. Smart researchers will figure out how they relate to the truth rather than trying to determine how their foolishness relates to the real story.
I believe Jimi was assassinated by CIA under their COINTELPRO Program using Jeffery’s problems with Jimi to conceal the real motive. These are real pros. Don’t underestimate them.
Can you surmise what part Eric Barrett and Gerry Stickells played in this ? Monika stated that they came to the apartment and immediately absconded all of Jimi’s telephone messages … hmmmm. Rather suspicious considering what just occurred , wouldn’t you say? Why would the phone messages interest them ? Perhaps they received orders from someone to remove the messages…
I must admit, I’m lost on that one regarding telephone messages. What kind of messages? One’s that were written down? Somehow recorded (I’m not sure how that basement flat telephone would have the capability).
Written on paper, sitting on a desk by the telephone. Being the busybody that she was, I’m sure that Monika “snooped” those messages but alas, that, as well as many other “intrigues ” have been buried with her.
Monika wrote in her book that Jimi told her to get the Samarkand hotel room in order to escape the office and that it was a secret hideaway designed to keep people from knowing where Jimi was. Typical of Monika she then wrote that Stickells and Barrett were looking for phone messages from the office in their clean-up. A good detective would notice right away that the clean-up at the Samarkand and its time period conformed to cleaning up a murder scene rather than a simple drug overdose.
“Typical of Monika she then wrote that Stickells and Barrett were looking for phone messages from the office in their clean-up”.
She certainly blew her own cover out her butt with that one there. No doubt, Monika’s tongue has many of her own footprints on it — meaning she stepped on her own tongue repeatedly.
You’re asking the right questions. A sharp observer would then ask why didn’t Scotland Yard since that is their business that they are trained in?
Buster, I have been researching Jimi’s death quite heavily in the past month or two, having been a Hendrix fanatic for years but always hesitantly accepting the Official Story that he overdosed and choked on his vomit accidentally, etc. I believe I have come across you in many different forums and comments sections and reviews across the net in my research (either that or it’s someone who talks and thinks exactly like you), and I first of all just want to say I really appreciate the research YOU have done into this tragedy and the passion and logic you apply when detailing what likely happened on that September night. It may seem strange that I have found so many of your posts just like that, but that points to one of the sad things about this all, which is that hardly anyone seems to be talking about it! Hardly anyone, even the biggest supposed fans of Jimi, will even grant the possibility that he may have been murdered. So in searching the net for some actual analysis and discussion I have invariably come across your insights, and I want to thank you for igniting my own passion in perhaps finding the truth in this mysterious labyrinth of propaganda, well-meaning fluff, half-lies, full-on lies, ignorance, dismissal, ad hominems and generally, silence. The silence is the saddest part.
Having said that, I do not 100% believe he was murdered, or murdered by Jeffrey; rather, I very strongly suspect it. I keep my mind open to the possibility it was an overdose or accident of some sort or even possibly suicide (though I hate when people argue for this, as it defames a dead man)… but the more I read, the more likely it seems that Jimi was murdered. The more I read, the more sinister the whole last year of his life (or more) seems. As if there was a black cloud hovering above him wherever he went, except this fanciful metaphor had some very real, very human and very dangerous faces to it. And the more I read, the more ominous and overwhelmingly tragic and poignant Jimi’s final recordings seem; Cry of Love in particular is dripping with sadness.
Anyway, one thing I’ve been pondering is the whole MSG incident on 1/28/70. There is full audio of the performance and it’s dispiriting and almost scary the way everything goes wrong, the way Jimi offends the audience with a surreal insult about blood-stained panties, the way both songs the band attempt playing seem to be slipping away from them, from Jimi, as they play, as if he couldn’t keep up with it. He seems very much on a bad trip. But is Buddy Miles’s suggestion that Jeffrey dosed Hendrix purposefully credible? Or, if that’s true, how would Jeffrey know the acid was “bad” or would have a negative effect? It certainly was an easy way to break up the BOG, of course, if that’s what happened.
“That’s what happens when Earth fucks with space — never forget that,” Jimi said before he left the stage. Now, this may sound like just some meaningless acid insight, but I don’t think it is. I feel there is meaning here; he sounds angry or disappointed beyond just being frazzled because of some overpowering LSD giving him bad vibes. It sounds like there’s one thing or person in particular (Earth?) that’s fuckin’ with him (space?) and, like oil and water, the combination just won’t do. The alchemical magic he needed to produce that extraterrestrial galactic sky church music was missing, but was Jimi referring to the music itself — to Buddy Miles’s earthy locked-in drumming and increasingly intrusive singing/role in the band — or to Jeffrey, or possible others? I believe there is meaning in that elusive statement and I believe that fateful night is related to the last show he ever did, the ironically titled Love & Peace Festival in Fehmarn, Germany, where poor Billy Cox himself was spiked with acid. In both cases, someone was pulling strings, trying to stop the show, Earth fuckin’ with space again. If we can say with any certainty who that person was (and it seems fairly likely it was Jeffrey) then we’ll be one very small step closer to justice for Jimi. Either that or I’m up one of many blind alleys. But I felt like writing something to release the giant weight that’s built up on me since researching and reading of the true details of Jimi’s death — this incredible person, whom I basically idolized as a teen, and still hold in the highest regard, did not die a tragic but predictable death due to his own human folly, but had his life cut short due to the malicious intent of some other(s). This realization opened my eyes and broke my heart, and I hope we will get more answers in our lifetimes as to who may have been involved.
Oh, and I just want to add: It’s rather obvious (to some people anyway), but the amount of premature deaths of people close to Hendrix at the time of his death is suspicious and damning in and of itself. Devon Wilson, Michael Jeffrey, Chas Chandler, Monika Danneman… (Am I forgetting somebody?) Those three alone are very telling, especially the circumstances of their deaths.
I also find it unusual that Noel Redding, Mitch Mitchell and Buddy Miles have all passed away too, at unusually young ages (the latter two even dying in the same year, which was a real blow). I won’t say I suspect there was foul play or anything (though neither would I *completely* rule it out), but I just find it unusual that almost all of the people closest to Jimi have died far before their time. Sadly, one of the Aleem brothers who were so close to Jimi, Tunde Ra, died last year. Even Larry Lee of the Gypsy Sun & Rainbows passed in his sixties in 2007. Billy Cox is almost the “last man standing,” especially musically. It’s almost easier to name the people close to Jimi who ARE alive than those who aren’t. Eric Burdon, Kathy Etchingham (god bless her), Juma Sultan, Jerry Velez, Taharqa Aleem, etc.
Anyway, just idle rambling on my part. By the way, I sat right next to Mitch Mitchell at a little restaurant in France sometime in 2005 or 2006 and I’m still kicking myself for not trying to talk to him…
Hello Night Bird,
I’ve also been studying this case for nearly seven years. In my judgement, especially after reading the Aleem Twins book “Ghetto Fighters in Harlem World”, there just isn’t any other possible deduction other than homicide in the Jimi Hendrix death case.
TaharQa Aleem (Albert Allen) caught both Mike Jeffery & Monika Dannemann red-handed with their hands in the cookie jar in Jeffery’s office shortly after Jimi died.
Too many people have incriminatingly shut-up or lied about that morning/day when Jimi died.
Dr. Bannister is telling the truth. In over 40 years, nobody has provided any substantial proof to overturn his testimonial witnessing. Bannister spent nearly a half hour suctioning fluid that was mostly red wine from Hendrix’s stomach and lungs.
You cannot have large quantities of red wine in the stomach and lungs and a blood alcohol content of 0.005%, while having enough barbitural content to sedate African big game at the same time. It just isn’t possible for that to be anything other than homicide.
The coroner, Gavin Thurston, told UPI representative, Jack Meehan on Sept. 29, 1970, regarding Jimi’s stomach contents, that “a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed” (this is in Sharon Lawrence book ‘Betrayal’). So you see, the Inquest did know about the red wine, but kept it hush-hush, because they knew it signified foul play.
he said that
Thanks Night Bird. Truthfully I have been questioning God and reality over this since the dead silent lack of reaction to this is somewhat disturbing and shakes my previous concept of reality. When the Jews were viciously persecuted by the Nazis at least they were liberated. This cause is like the Nazis being allowed to finish the job with full consent. If you want to understand what the recent black protesters are protesting against just consider that Jimi’s blackness is most likely what keeps this obvious horrendous case from being acted upon. It’s crazy but Jimi proves that no matter how famous you are if you are black you are as good as any lynched N***** and better accept that. That’s an evil that needs to be broken. It’s hard enough to expose CIA murders to begin with. Jimi had the unfortunate stars to be holding all aces. But that sort of defines Jimi’s magic doesn’t it?
Yeah, I get zero response to my reviews. I’m treated like a neighbor who comes to the party and tries to convince everyone of the wonders of communism and to sign up. Nothing but vacant stares in return from the Philistines. This is the playing field Jimi and his advocates face against cold stone-walled governments and their corrupted justice systems. What gets to me the most is some of these pompous phonies who are the main Hendrix voices of today who don’t even have this on their radar. I could name names but I won’t. In any case some of those phonies obviously actively avoid the murder subject as if it were taboo. That just goes to show how little respect they have for Jimi. Some of them are dumb enough to say their ignoring Jimi’s murder is showing respect for him. I was kicked off the main Hendrix website Crosstown Torrents by an 18 year old British coward named “Fender’s Fingers” for defending Jimi. That site welcomes and protects some very evil scum who attack the murder evidence with the full approval of obnoxious moderators who bombastically cite site rules they make up as they go along while trolling serious posts about Jimi’s murder. After using the cowardly method of banning they then safely pronounce themselves the best of the Hendrix world.
Night Bird, Jimi was definitely, undoubtably murdered. If you read my writings you’ll see that we’ve disproven any accidental death on a forensic basis. If you are still considering other causes you haven’t researched enough. There’s no accidental death scenario anyone can present that I can’t disprove with the real facts. That leaves the only other option, which is murder. I suggest you study up on the US government’s COINTELPRO Program to understand the true context of Jimi’s death and, more importantly, the scofflaw refusal of the British government to honestly recognize the evidence or assert the due process they are sworn to.
You show a good understanding of Jimi in your sensitivity to his sound in those final months. Jimi was in effect playing his own funeral music in a haunting way that fit his supernatural awareness,
What people don’t understand is Jeffery was an intel agent. Such a person is like a mafia member. They never leave the outfit and are always prone to service without any choice. Jimi was given a LSD mickey for the Viet Nam War Memorial Concert because that was exactly what CIA was worried about with their anti-messiah program. Jeffery wanted Jimi to remain a non-political musician he could control and profit off of. Jimi launching an all-black band in an anti war concert is something that was CIA’s worst nightmare. This stuff isn’t rocket science and it puts into proper context the rest of what happened to Jimi. The pompous Hendrix experts who ignore this are just pathetic cowards. History will record their abandonment of Jimi and leaving him to the wolves. And, yes, this pattern was repeated with Billy. It is as obvious as it looks. You are seeing the dirty fingerprint of intel there. The same bastards that weren’t afraid to violate Billy like that were the same bastards who weren’t afraid to murder Jimi. COINTELPRO.
Jimi’s death is quite Christian because he, like Jesus, suffered a complete betrayal by all those who were close to him and still does even today. This moral magnetism defines Jimi and his central mystery. The system had to murder what he stood for.
I’m lucky to have met Mitch and Noel at the same time and had a private chat with them. You should have introduced yourself to Mitch. He was a good bloke. Unfortunately it is my theory that Mitch, Noel, and Chas all shortened their lives through bad habits that were partly motivated by their guilt over what they knew really happened to Jimi. If that was helped along by the same evil bastards that killed Jimi I don’t know. But it would fit a known pattern of their killing of witnesses.
Night Bird. The CIA murdered Jimi Hendrix. If you do the right research like I have you’ll come to that same unavoidable conclusion. It’s even possible they murdered Jeffery too. Americans sell themselves as a brave people who fight hard for democracy but the truth is what they really are is a people who can be depended upon to stand by and do nothing while their heroes are slaughtered by the real Nazis who run our government. America is a lie. A bright shining stinking lie.
Thanks, Buster and Flyswatter, for the insightful responses.
I have this thing I do sometimes, it’s kind of wrongheaded, but it’s that I keep my mind open to the possibility that the sky is green even when all evidence suggests blue. So, what I mean is, ultimately I do agree that Jimi was murdered. The other factor in my hesitancy, especially initially, is how crushingly sad and heartbreaking Jimi and his life becomes when one realizes the sinister overtones of those last couple years with Jeffrey, as well as Chalpin, Danneman, countless “hangers-on,” uh, the US government, and even his own money-grubbing father surrounding him like hungry vultures over a still-living person. When I read enough evidence to realize that Hendrix did not die accidentally or of his own accord, it fucking Killed me, man. I suspect that’s why there’s so many Hendrix fans who have this knee-jerk dismissal of the possibility of his murder — it’s simply too sad, too “heavy,” too much reality, for them to bear, and they’d rather just retreat back into their safe little fan-worship cocoons, unaware that REAL “fans” or supporters of Jimi would cry for justice or at least a deeper look into the happenings of that night instead of accepting the usual Danneman lies and rock-star-burnout/27-club lies and cliches.
Of course, a lot of these Hendrix fans are not well-meaning, as you know, Buster, and they may never accept the truth simply because they dismiss anything diverging from the propaganda ingrained in them as “conspiracy theory nonsense” or whatever (from what I’ve read on the CTT forum, the so-called discussion of Jimi’s death points this way most of the time, and is just incredibly close-minded and fascist in the most repulsive way). But some fans are good people who have a heart and soul and will accept the truth eventually, it’s just that they have a strong emotional reaction to this idea, which seems so alien and wrong to them after years of conditioning to believe in his overdose or suicide. I’ve seen at least a few people like this actually turn around and accept the murder scenario with just a few paragraphs of well-researched insight. (And by the way, I was re-reading the article posted in italics that we’re all commenting on, and I think it may be the best single piece to show to the skeptics and the overdose/suicide believers; not that it’s better than a few of the best books on the subject, but because it condenses almost all the truth of the matter into a relatively short passage, and so is good for convincing in these ADD-riddled times when one can’t always except people to seek out Tony Brown’s book or whatever).
Speaking of books, I’ve just ordered Ghetto Fighters in Harlem World and look forward to reading. I also have Danneman’s Inner World book on the way, but I as much look forward to as dread and fear that thing. She exudes some kind of evil that I can’t explain in words precisely; but for example, just watching the interview with her in the “Mugshots” doc from the 90s on Hendrix’s death creeped me out, the drugged, hypnotic way she speaks and the fussed-over, faux-elegant sheen of her dress, some purple or blue velvet thing with a giant crucifix affixed to it. Her interview with Sharon Lawrence when they first met right after Jimi’s death is enough to make one cry and scream at the same time… all the evasions, the phony-crying at a key point yet complete lack of emotion shown in the rest of the interview, the way she seems so happy about her paintings and how Jimi loved them and her and how totally undisturbed she seems about what just happened hours before. Creepy, eerie stuff.
Buster, again I just want to say how much I applaud your tenaciousness and quest for justice and truth, and I honestly think that I’m not being too optimistic in saying that sometime in the next decade this whole thing will explode and reach a wider audience, and we all won’t be on the fringes anymore. These things take time and hard-won acceptance of some very dispiriting facts, but this is one of those cases where the facts are so obvious to anyone looking that the liars (like Cross, Danneman, Glebeek, etc) are looking increasingly suspect even to the simplest layman. That’s what helps me sleep at night, anyway.
It’s not as innocent as that Night Bird. The Hendrix community at this point is dominated by egos who have been in the business long enough to stake a place on the internet. The motive of those people might be partly what you say, but for anyone in the game long enough as they’ve been there’s no excuse for not catching on to these obvious facts. What gives them away is they are smart enough to become the main archivists and purveyors of Hendrix information and websites. Some of the posts of those Crosstown members show serious ability and intelligence. I assure you those members are not innocently shocked and in denial. They are persons who are very much aware Jimi was murdered. They have just found whatever reason compels them to not discuss it. For some it will be their personal background where they consider it dangerous to make themselves vulnerable by discussing it. Some are just of the personality that they aren’t capable of detecting or admitting covert intrigue. Some have right-wing leanings and don’t allow for government wrongdoing by predetermined mentality. Some, that I’m sure you’re aware of, are just too plain fucking stupid to understand. The simplest way to put it is the main motivation of those scum is that Jimi is dead, he’s left a rich treasure that can be plucked and traded by those who appreciate it, and risking your neck, or being made uncomfortable by recognizing the evidence, is something those scum don’t have to do. Think of them as pirates not wanting to draw heat on their MP-3 grabbing and you’ll be close to understanding them. They are like spiders who suck the talent and music out of their object of interest Jimi Hendrix but then cast his desiccated shell out to the curb when it comes to taking responsibility for Jimi himself. Those people are scum. There’s no excuse for them. May they be damned. May they be the ones to choke on Hendrix.
My particular interest are those members who are government agents. I suspect Charles Cross is one of those people. Like some of the Crosstown members, he has too much knowledge and ability to be so dumb about the murder evidence. He also inserts a suggestion that gives his devious purpose away. He wrote that Monika may have taken a Vesparax at 4am and slept through the whole choking on vomit event. When I read that I realized that was a deliberate device Cross used in order to avoid detailing what actually did happen after 4am. This is evidence of deliberate deceit in my mind, which means Cross purposely misled the public in his book about how Jimi died. So did reporter Sharon Lawrence. If you read about CIA in the 1960’s they openly admitted infiltrating the US media in order to spin events their way. Of the two reporters who wrote about Jimi’s death both of them gave provably false information leading the readers away from any murder conclusion. To me this confirms CIA involvement in Jimi’s murder. They wouldn’t be trying to cover it up so badly 40 years later if that weren’t so. However smart people will see the murder method was strictly an intel black bag job. No doubt about it. Covert murder using drugs and alcohol to mimic a reckless drug abuse death.
I don’t give credit to the London Times for anything, including this article. I couldn’t find it on Google but when Kathy Etchingham’s petition came out the Times did a nasty mocking article asking why would Kathy be doing this? Was she bored or seeking attention because her one claim to fame was receding into the past? The Times ripped her as being a Miss Marple going over her head with some kind of crazy publicity stunt. This Times article by Dominic Wells should be viewed for what it is. It is the cowardly, indirect confession of an institution that helped cover this up with its original non-interest, and, therefore, complicity. It is the false priests of the high media giving faux recognition by means of pretend analysis when the truth is they knew the whole time. In short, the Philistine press pawing its prey with half admissions and phony pondering. The public gets conditioned by this false press into not realizing that they are the institutions that were supposed to discover and investigate all this business back then. When they snuggle up to you with half hearted efforts like this they should be strongly reminded of that. Even this article doesn’t offer all it could. But that’s understandable because the more they offered the more obvious it would become that they didn’t investigate originally.
As for Monika, read what I wrote here and figure out how she fits in to all this and see if that white witch in elegant dress doesn’t perfectly match. Monika is a very complex person forced to stay in character in the middle of a brightly lit stage for the rest of her life. She exited when the real plot was about to be exposed.
I am 30 years oId and i recently I began playing guitar and I was looking at different players for inspiration david gilmore, richie blackmore and of course Jimi Hendrix. i knew his more well known songs but was never a real follower of his music. Then the more I began watching and listening to him the more I became a fan of his music. I then started to want find anything I could on jimi especially any interviews on him because I felt he had this kind of magnetic effect that would draw you in to anything he would say. In any interview he had a real vulnerability about him huge shyness even childlike persona as in the video of him playing 12 string blues impossible to think that could be the same man capable of what he was doing with a piece of wood and some strings. Then you watch him play an there was no shyness no weakness or vulnerability, he was centre of the universe he was in total control he was all powerful.
This all added to the intrigue and interest to learn more and at the time made his death seem to only add to his mystique and fame and of course he had to die in real rock and roll style.
Then I came across a documentary on his last 24 hours. At times I wish I never had.
At the end of that documentary I felt sick, I wanted to vomit and now unfortunately my attention has gone from listening to him play, admiring his skill and ability to now finding out anything I can on his murder and after months of searching I have found “buster” his knowledge and comprehension on all events surrounding his murder is unrivalled. I’ve read this page from top to bottom a dozen times now.
Buster you dont need to say anymore. Energy should be focused now on how something can be done to bring justice and peace to jimi and re-write the history books to show the truth.
Thanks Daniel. Only the best Hendrix fans end up at this watering hole. It’s the wellhead spring of Jimi’s cosmic oracle. The litmus test for a true Hendrix fan is how he treats his murder. Only those who fully appreciate what Jimi was see the pressing moral imperative and biblical dilemma involved in putting the true definition of his life and mission right. If you understand Jimi it’s no exaggeration to speak in those terms.
The reason it is biblical is because Jimi embodied and aimed towards that level with his talent and mission. When you get as close to the tone and vibe of that radiating ball of light at the center of the universe it doesn’t really need to be spelled-out in detail does it? Jimi cracks me up because he has a gentlemanly tolerance for people who don’t get this in interviews. It’s really why we are talking about him. Sure enough the same pathetic people show up and deny this aspect just like Judas in the bible. The level of ignorance, stupidity, and cowardice it attracts is disgusting and pathetic just like the bible. Some of Jimi’s friends also fail to see this and do their best not to help. They are only failing Jimi, whatever their justification. Then you have the evil main Judas Caesar Glebbeek who after making his living selling Jimi for decades turned around and campaigned for his murderers by attacking the murder evidence. The scum who follow him enforce silence on the topic on their websites. Those people sell themselves as the best Hendrix fans but they are actually the worst. They are fools who Jimi would be disgusted by and reject. They blindly miss this most important aspect of Jimi while hoarding his treasure and persecuting people who recognize and respond to it. A good toilet-flushing of the Crosstown Torrents website would probably hermetically excise this abomination from the Hendrix universe leaving the credible side intact. They are the world. Jimi was the sky.
Anyway, thanks. I was beginning to think it was just me. That of course would be no problem because you’ll find me a deft swordsman in defense of Jimi who has already left an oracle midden of defeated fools who were dumb enough to take me on on this. The bogus Hendrix world is now focused towards enforcing silence and coordinating an ignoring of the subject, but it won’t save them. In any case, as you say, the task is now a government big game safari with me being a world class Serengeti hunter who is very enthusiastic about being given the privilege to defend rock’s fallen prince. I’ve pulled a sword out of a rock that was meant for me. I fully intend to apply it as was its purpose. Cowards beware…
It’s not you Buster, you’re about as switched on as it comes with regards to this matter. Seems like Crosstowntorrents is having major hassles, I tried to login last night to troll the site and it seems they are having some “server side” problems, and today, it’s totally not available at all, page does not exist, and probably, rightfully so should forever. A quick check of their FB page confirms it was not just my problem (tried several browsers)…
Paul Metcalfe why has my account been suspende, can`t understand why
May 31 at 3:37pm
David Fairweather I don’t think its you. I think CTT has been “suspended” by its ISP.
1 · May 31 at 4:15pm
Tom Gomprecht This is sad news. Hopefully just a temporary situation.
June 1 at 5:26am
Paul Metcalfe tried to download but got the message illegal string off set in path line 6570 header already sent, anyone know what this means
June 1 at 12:52pm
Paul Metcalfe wish to hell someone would fix this site
See Translation
11 Июнь в 15:48
Paul Metcalfe cant understand why there advertising this site when you cant get on crosstown torrents stupid
Good riddance forever….(hopefully)
They’ll probably be back though.
Crosstown regulars can post. That site is an inclusive club of friends with a narrow aggressive agenda to be the best experts and collectors. What it really is is a toxic insider’s private site that can’t allow the public because it would become clear that they have a dark agenda. It’s a travesty because Jimi would never approve of such a site, let alone it being the only major Hendrix website on the internet. It seems Jimi has a curse on him that whoever runs him ends up committing these offenses.
Anyhow, the site is run by mid-westerner and ex-Navy man Pat Peterson who doesn’t feel any need to account for all this. I don’t know if he censors the murder topic in loyalty to the military authorities he once served or if he is just an incompetent administrator who really doesn’t give a flying f about Jimi himself. Those Crosstown people obviously don’t care about Jimi and put themselves and their scummy group above Jimi himself as long as they are in control. Its purpose is trading MP-3 files of Jimi’s music. So its first motive is piracy and not reverent respect for Jimi and his fate. He’s basically traded like a commodity (a slave) and standing up for him only interferes with that. The site is run by cowards and really shouldn’t be allowed to exist. It also harbors a majority of brits who get away with imposing the denialist British viewpoint on Jimi’s murder as well as the accepted form of outright censorship commonly accepted in Britain on an American site.
Pat Peterson is a real hero. His Facebook page lists gun nut websites as some of his favorite links. Should this person be running the internet’s only Hendrix website?
A resounding no to that question. With you all the way on the gun nut thing, no wonder the US has 30,000 gun murders a year, where-as in my old home country, Australia, we have about 300 gun murders a year, that means it takes Australia 100 years to rack up the same number of gun deaths America racks up in ONE year!!! (even if you factor in the population difference, it would take Oz roughly 10 years to rack up one year’s worth of gun murders in the USA).
I’m sure PP is very proud of himself, like the late Charlton Heston was. A bunch of school kids get shot up at school, what do these fools do ? They go and buy MORE GUNS!!! That’s the answer!
That’s a pretty f’d up society, on that aspect alone. Throw WASPs into the mix with the gun nuts and you have something akin to insanity.
These people should not be running anything, let alone the internets premier site for JH…
When trying to register a new account today on CTT…
“Sorry, registration has been disabled by the administrator.”
Bunch of sycophants, bowing to PP, secure in their contrived insular world!
They don’t give a damn about Jimi they just want to loot his treasure. The moderators openly troll serious efforts to show the evidence for Jimi’s murder and promote lying scum like STPLSD, Purple Jim, and many others in order to enforce the moronic level Crosstown Torrents prefers. Smelling their own smell they have now backed in to a private site mode not offering any membership to the public. It’s easier to protect their Judas-like betrayal of Jimi and actively fighting for his murderers that way. Purple Jim, Fender’s Fingers, and STPLSD are all brits. They don’t want to admit Jimi was murdered in their own country by one of their own intelligence agents and covered up by their own government so they troll instead while openly ignoring the evidence. The consensus on that site was Caesar was the final word and did a good job.
Buster , proof positive of what you have been saying….the British are in denial that Jimi was murder on her land. This thread from Facebook shows , again, what you have been saying about the British refusing to acknowledge forensic evidence. Read Limey Rob Moss’ comments from the the post made by “Brian Jones” under the Jimi/Jeffery
photo
https://www.facebook.com/groups/352788294759757/?fref=nf
Dear Buster / guys
I’ve been familiar with Hendrix and his music for many years but only comparatively recently with the murder theories. At first I confess that I was sceptica, but having researched the key documentary and forensic evidence it’s obvious that the guy was murdered. I am actually a professional trained historian and therefore used to analysing political events through evidence and intuition, and for me there is little doubt what happened on 18th September 1970 at the Hotel Samarkand or who was responsible. I would like to see this case reopened and properly investigated by the authorities. How do we achieve this? How can I help?
Pingback: What Killed Jimi Hendrix | Opiaka4
I recently spoke with Bob Levine in person in his nursing home. He’s in reasonably good shape for an 87 year old man. He was glad to see me and I am probably his most active friend right now. Bob excoriated Caesar Glebbeek and said he never met him, spoke to him, or was interviewed by him. I informed Bob that Caesar had brought his summation, in his disinformation work ‘Until We Meet Again’, to the highlighted quote: “If you don’t believe me listen to Jimi Hendrix manager Bob Levine” and he followed with some cherry-picked quotes from Bob saying the murder theories were all bullshit and Jimi wasn’t murdered. Bob responded by emphasizing he never consented for Caesar to quote him that way and that “Caesar was a well-known bullshit-artist who was known to do that to other people too.”
This interview was the culmination of my phoning Bob and visiting him several times at his house since Caesar’s 2011 publication. I even slept over and helped him with his meds since his vision problems made knowing which meds were which important. In these visits and calls I had explained the evidence to Bob and informed him of things he wasn’t aware of. He had come around and told me he thought that actually maybe Jimi was murdered and I should take my evidence to the FBI. I had to tell Bob FBI wasn’t such a good idea since they were probably involved.
But I’ve got Bob Levine on video saying he didn’t give Caesar permission to quote him that way and Caesar was known for that kind of dirty trick. He then added, in order to set the record straight, that he now believes Jimi could have been murdered. I also have him saying Michael Jeffery got karma when he crashed. As in karma for murdering Jimi.
So much for Caesar being the final say as the morons on Crosstown proclaimed as they banned me. Though I do agree with Caesar – listen to Bob Levine…
Yes indeed, the truth is going to overtake these liar-deniars like Glebbeek, just like it did Monika Dannemann. Some dummies don’t learn from history & Glebbeek is obviously one of those people.
Caesar is an arrogant ass. He thinks his Hendrix expertise gives him the right to pronounce lies over the top of others trying to tell the truth. He simply thinks his Hendrix information background gives him the credibility to lie in public and deliberately sell distorted information and deceptive avoidance of the truth in his Hendrix death publication ‘Until We Meet Again’. And the Hendrix public doesn’t raise a peep and credits him for it. Caesar is a vicious betrayer of Jimi Hendrix who made money from his Hendrix-centered UniVibes magazine for decades and then turned around and sold Jimi to the devil and his murderers in ‘Until We Meet Again. Caesar has committed an act equal to Judas Iscariot and must be made to pay an appropriate price by those few decent fans of intelligent moral integrity who still defend and care about Jimi instead of fecklessly making it easier for themselves to enjoy his treasure while leaving Jimi in the gutter as far as his murder. May those fans share the same fate as Caesar and may I be the one who makes that happen. The reason you don’t see Caesar out defending ‘Until We Meet Again’ is because that pig knows he got caught selling a pack of lies against Jimi.
In a nutshell, all that “Until We Meet Again” trashheap publication is really telling anyone is that Monika Dannamann pissed on Caesar’s head and told him it was raining, and Caesar to this day still wants to believe it is raining because it was Monika that was doing the urinating.
Here is the final nail in the coffin for Caesar Glebbeek’s disinformation work ‘Until We Meet Again’. Glebbeek wrote the work in a way that led up to the quote: “If you don’t believe me listen to Jimi’s manager Bob Levine”. Caesar then quoted Bob saying the murder theories were all bs. Here is what Bob really thinks:
Buster! Yayyyyyyyyy! So glad you got this. You are truly a credit to Jimi’s spirit. So glad to have met you.
The liars at Crosstown Torrents are over there safely protected by their cowardly banning and censorship ignoring what is being said in this video. Instead they re-posted Bob’s saying Tappy’s book was bullshit in the Daily News. However if they are going to hold Bob to his prior quotes they should re-post his earliest words in McDermott’s 1992 book ‘Setting The Record Straight’ where he listed numerous incriminating incidents that drew his suspicion over Jeffery’s involvement in Jimi’s death. It is obvious that the moderator Fenders Fingers is posting Bob’s Daily News quote because he literally can’t address the unavoidable significance of what this video undoubtedly shows. There’s no doubt that it shows, contrary to what Glebbeek was saying, that Bob actually does believe Jimi was murdered and that Caesar took liberties and misreported the truth. Crosstown is desperate to avoid what Bob is saying here because they heavily banked on Caesar’s disinformation work ‘Until We Meet Again’ and any concession that it isn’t credible will lead directly to Crosstown not being credible itself, so they have to avoid it at all costs.
The poster “STPLSD” (a crass denier and troll) even has the balls to suggest Bob wasn’t exactly enthusiastically endorsing the murder claim in this video. This is typical of the backwards deceit Crosstown practices. It is more than obvious from watching this video that the real issue here is Bob doesn’t exactly enthusiastically endorse the “murder claims are all bs” quote that Caesar so dishonestly presented against what Bob really thinks, as it is shown in this video. What part of “I have suspicion, I don’t have proof, but I have suspicion” do STPLSD and the punkish deniers at Crosstown fail to understand or how that diametrically conflicts with Caesar’s misleading “If you don’t believe me listen to Jimi’s manager Bob Levine”? Apparently, for Crosstown and Caesar, Bob is worth quoting up to the point that he says the opposite of what they want to believe. Then they pull their usual dirty tricks, just like they do with all the other evidence. I think that’s what Bob is really saying here…
Pingback: Were they just… done? – rememberthe27
My good friend and Hendrix manager Bob Levine passed away sometime during the summer of 2016. The nursing home would not release any details so I’m working on finding the date. Bob reveals in the video above that he believed Jimi was murdered. Bless you Bob…
Buster, have you read the book “Drugs As a Weapon Against Us ” by John Potash ? It delves into the intelligence ops’ involvement in the murders of Jimi, Brian Jones, Bob Marley, John Lennon, Kurt Cobain , etc. Also the attempted assassination of Mick Jagger. Also, how the Grateful Dead were used as ops to spread the drug culture to the youth for the purpose of mind control.Also it discusses in depth the unusually high number of musicians that achieved fame that happened to be children of high ranking military parents.
I spoke to Potash on the phone a couple of years ago…He’s on the right track, however his research and thesis spreads in to the broader subject of Intel social control…Mae Brussel also pushed that track heavily…It is hard to figure out where Intel influence ends and kids just being in to the incredible mesmerizing drug LSD begins some times…Books like Constantine’s and Potash’s are good but they tend to be too broad and miss the more precise reasons for Jimi’s murder…We finally beat Crosstown Torrents in a debate on Facebook…Their reaction was to have their head bully STPLSD stand up and order people to ignore our evidence…And the idiots on that site obeyed…This is all OK with the owner Pat Peterson who told us to pay for our own website if we wanted to talk about Jimi’s murder (Pat never answered how kicking the people in best possession of the facts behind Jimi’s death off his website worked for Jimi and his interests)…Crosstown isn’t interested in the truth…
“Fender’s Fingers” – the bastard moderator on Crosstown Torrents who bans anyone who posts the facts about Jimi’s murder is a British man named Gordon Johnson…He’s a brit connected to the British Hendrix publication ‘Jimpress’…He boots anyone who posts the truth on Jimi’s murder off Crosstown Torrents because the British don’t want to admit Jimi was killed by one of their own intelligence agents and it was covered-up by their government…The curmudgeon murder denier “STPLSD” on the same site is another Britisher named “Renwick McNeil”…The Crosstown Torrents owner Pat Peterson is an ex Navy neo-con from Illinois who allows this sick situation to rule on the internet’s only Hendrix website…
Hi Everybody.. I Am a Life Long Jimi Fan And a Music Artist..Guitrist(And Other Instruments)Singer/Songwriter in My Own Right. I Am Not Going to Write a Chapter Here..But What I Am Going to Do is Point Out The 5 Irrefutable Facts That Very Strongly Point to Mike’s Guilt and Monica’s Guilt and/or Knowledge Thereof of Mike’s Guilt and Her Complicity…And They are 1.(Which is Very Unbelievably Being Overlooked) Approx.a Year Before Jimi’s Death on Sept 18th 1970 Mike Had Jimi Kidnapped (Most Likely to Scare Jimi into Doing Things His Way or Else (Something Much More Drastic Would Happen To Him if Didn’t) and as We All Know History Has Proven That Something Did Indeed Happen To Him. 2. Mike’s Devulging of The Fact That Jimi In Fact was Drowned with Red Wine (Something That Was Never Surmised or Made Public Until Decades Later and Only The Killer or Someone With First Hand Knowledge From The Killer Could Have Known) 3.The Fact That Jimi in Fact Did Plan on Severing Ties With Mike as His Management and There was a 2 Million Dollar Life Insurance Policy on Jimi’s Life and All of The Studio Recordings Jimi Had Finished (Or Partly Finished) in Various Vaults Around The World Made Jimi By No Stretch of The Imagination Worth More To Mike Desd Then Alive 4. That Monica Basically Dedicated Her Life to Jimi in The Form of Painted Art Works (That I Must Say are Damm Good and Very Impressive) Which to Me (IMO) Symbolizes a Strange Type of Martyrdom Probably Out of Guilt. And Lastly Number 5.Monica’s Eventual Suicide (Again Out of Guilt That Obviously Overtook Her By That Time in Her Life) .. And There as They Say Folks You Have it. So Yess..Mike Jeffries Did Murder or Was Responsible for The Murder Of Jimi Hendrix Beyond The Shadow of All Doubt. And R.I.P. Jimi My Most Amazing Musical Brotha for Now The Horrible Truth of The Facts Pretaining to Your Most Unfortunate Death Have Finally Been Unmasked and Revealed.
It is sad that the rate of agreement on this subject is one poster every 4 years or so…Most of what you write is the commonly assumed evidence…Doubters would say there is no proof that Jeffery told Tappy about the wine, but as a personal close friend of Tappy’s who called him regularly for the 5 years before his death, I can say if Jeffery didn’t tell him directly someone else who he couldn’t mention did…Your most keen observation is Monika’s weird profile because of her painting and monk-like dedication to Jimi…Only the most observant realize this shows serious psychological profile evidence toward Monika’s true role…What I have concluded is that Monika was dragged in to the plot because she was an active CIA asset who was somehow induced to do it but then had sympathy with her victim afterwards…If you can grasp this and its significance, Monika may not have committed suicide…Either way, suicide or not, it was directly related to her role in Jimi’s death and is equally incriminating either way…One of the biggest give-aways is Scotland Yard not being interested in this glaring evidence – which, for more aware observers, tells you who really did it and why…I also believe Jeffery’s death was not an accident and then we are through the looking glass on the level of involvement and motives, aren’t we?
..And Just To Twist The Knife Here… Isn’t it Strangely Profound That After Mike Revealing The Truth to Someone (Anyone) On This Planet With His Own Lips Did He Myseriously Die in The Plane Crash Very Sortly After The Disclosure as If The Creator Said….And Now I Can Take His Evilass Out of This World…..Which Brings to Mind The Good Ole Adage…Karma’s a Bitch… (It Certainly Is…Isn’t It ??? )
..Very Shortly After…
Where is the Karma for the majority of Hendrix fan a-holes who attack people for posting this evidence and ban them? Again, only the most observant realize Jeffery was most likely murdered for his role and the convenience his death would have for those who really murdered Jimi…If you think of the way Jeffery died then you are at the right place for who really did it and why…
Good read, and good points On things I never even knew about. I don’t even know how I got here, when I should be mowing and raking the yard. This was better time spent.
Thanks for reading
What I do not understand is how someone like Monika could write an entire book on Jimi and his spiritual beliefs after spending only a few days with him. I think she tried to exaggerate her importance to Jimi as his soulmate. Monika was about promoting herself and her importance to Jimi. When Kathy dispelled this myth it all got a bit too much for Monika and I think that is why she committed suicide.
One reply about every 3 years is the pathetic response rate for this epic subject…Ivana – the reason Monika knew so much about Jimi is because she was a CIA operative who studied her target in order to get Jimi to warm up to her as part of her infiltration…I think there are signs that Intelligence mind control hypnosis may also have been employed in this process…It took me years to figure out the meaning of the frustration you are experiencing…I also had the same puzzlement until I deciphered it and figured out its true interpretation…Monika is a complex person and she was an Intel infiltrator who ended up getting impressed and mesmerized by the mystical figure Jimi Hendrix because of her proximity to him…What happened was Monika realized the stuff she studied about Jimi was real once she experienced it in person and she basically became a follower of the person she was spooking…All this is over Kathy’s head…She is a person who is blind to these subtleties and sees everything in a left brain sense…Monika had heavy right brain intuition like Jimi and that is why she was so good at describing it…Which in turn attracted Jimi and was then used to further infiltrate him…The bottom line is just because you’re a spook infiltrating Jimi doesn’t mean you can’t be a follower of the target’s deepest inner world…Monika was consumed and tortured by this for the rest of her life before she was also assassinated by Intel…Monika did not commit suicide…She was “suicided” by the best abilities of the dark forces that killed Jimi…I’m angry at Kathy because she refuses to see the obvious bigger picture here (or at least talk about it in public)…
Thanks for your comments. I think Kathy had the practicality of mind to bring about the re-investigation into the death of Jimi. The court case between Kathy and Monika was brought about because Monika called Kathy an inveterate liar in regards to her relationship with Jimi when it was Monika who had the fictional relationship to Jimi. I am sorry Jimi went back to the Samarkand with Monika and I am equally as sorry that Monika ended up the way she did. As l see it the only winner in this saga is Kathy. I think she has done more than anyone to keep Jimi’s memory alive.
Of course I totally agree and remain dedicated to and appreciative of the Joan Of Ark effort Kathy made…We owe an unpayable debt to Kathy because she was the only friend of Jimi’s who did what needed to be done and it was because of her good practical sense and forthrightness…Hear hear…However, that said, there is a second necessary follow-through anyone who truly stands up for Jimi as Kathy claims needs to do…What Kathy did was the first part…Now the second part needs to be done as a follow-through because the complete job wasn’t done…I don’t mean to be critical of Kathy but she might not have been the best person to front the effort because she failed to execute on a legal basis and seemed to be mostly interested in getting Monika rather than pursuing the full evidence in the case…By failing to assert a sound legal attack against the serious opening the British Government left her she allowed them to fail to account for some pretty wide open evidence that would have led to the full legal outcome the evidence demanded…As much as we owe Kathy she only did half a job and is not helping those who are trying to carry this forward and do what her effort made possible…For God’s sake Kathy scoffs at the suggestion Jeffery killed Jimi on the Montalvo show and indirectly defends him saying, “If they had evidence why didn’t they bring it forward then?”…Anyone with common sense would know there are many reasons why people don’t come forward and, as much as I hate to say, Kathy is one of those persons…She knows a lot more than she’s telling and her telling Montalvo that she has more to say in a future book isn’t really a “practical” approach to getting justice when it counts is it? Sorry Kathy but this is an open playing field under God’s sunlight…If you are holding back then you are working directly against Jimi and his interests…Jimi waits for you to do the right thing for him sooner rather than later…If I was on Kathy’s team there would have been a different outcome and the British Government would not have gotten away with the legal murder they did…
I wonder if Eric Burdon, Gerry Stickells and/or Eric Barrett are planning on speaking from the grave. Have some avenue to release info post mordem ?
Jimi is rock’s skeleton in the closet…No one is going to own up to holding back on him and being in cowardly complicity…The whole power order of the world is based on not owning up to this dastardly crucifixion…It is both an honor to Jimi and what he was and defining unspoken mark of shame to those who betrayed him – which was just about everybody…
This of course is all hear say evidence and would never hold up in any court, some of you swear that the CIA or MJ was responsible for Murder, that’s a brave talk from people who go buy books that could very well be untrue, none of those people pushed for a trial, only just to make money. What if M.D’s accounts were true if the CIA was involved like some of you swear by, they would have the whole thing covered up from the ambulance drivers and Doctors testimony. M.D was proven a liar…not so sure she was, he could of been alive when they arrived, Who knows? Hendrix was worth more alive by todays standards, always had been…any idiot would know that…but what was done with his guitars, I know only a few have been recovered. Its a money game anymore…Dweezil has one his family probably a few, tappy;s went back to the Hendrix family…, the mojo about those axes are mesmerizing, a lot of people think he was a black guitarist, untrue he was half Cherokee Indian, which I believe his spiritualness in his music comes from that mix. I first heard about Jimi when I heard Purple Haze at my friends house, we agreed he was gay, lol…we thought he said xcuse me while I kiss this guy…lol…my first album was the B.O.G I love them changes Buddy was great on that track. I have all of them now, but the BOG had its own kind of mojo for sure…Machine Gun is why is and will be the G.O.A.T. in any event there’s not one person today that can confirm or deny he was offed…so what is the point, unless they dig up his body for DNA samples…no one can really say what happened for sure. its like a normal police scene when they bust druggies, they have to wade thru 99% lies and probably never get to the truth….RIP J.H family fans and friends. Just my 2 cents
For 10 years I’ve been dealing with internet experts like yourself who think your internet-gotten opinion is just as good as persons who have deeply researched the subject and gotten close to some of the people involved…Internet experts follow the psychological pattern of getting defensive and then seeking the denials that back their ignorant opinion…What you write is dead wrong and Kathy Etchingham did push for a new investigation…The British government lied and shut it down with a false statement by the British Attorney General saying there was no new evidence when in fact there was highly important new evidence Kathy had discovered…If you bothered to study the evidence Kathy got hold of Britain’s best forensic pathologist Dr Rufus Crompton and he said Jimi died no later than 5:30am due to the undigested rice in his stomach at autopsy…You say maybe Monika was telling the truth but it is well-known that she lied about the time of death by about as much as 6 hours and the ambulance attendant confirmed this by saying the vomit was too dry and hard for the ventilation equipment to penetrate…Mitch Mitchell also indirectly confirmed this in his book when he said he got a call around 7am where he was told Jimi was dead…
As far as I know Steve Roby looked in to Jimi’s genealogy and he had no Cherokee blood…People who had white blood mixed in to their African blood were sometimes said to have Cherokee blood back then so the white background could not be admitted…Africans mixed in with Indians due to racism and then started to claim Indian blood when they actually didn’t have any…
You obviously have no idea what you are talking about so we can chalk your entry up to another worthless opinion that works directly against Jimi and his interests….I myself have researched this for 10 years and argued it on the internet…There is no doubt Jimi was murdered and people seeking shallow excuses instead of intelligently addressing the facts don’t help…I have proven Jimi was murdered in the forensics…You can’t have 5 bottles of wine witnessed in your body by a medical doctor and only have the 5mg blood alcohol content Jimi registered at his autopsy…It is proof of murder and you won’t find any other innocent drug/alcohol choking on vomit death with those forensic particulars…
My personal opinion is his death was accidental…with all the events changing from time to time promotes books to be sold. I don’t believe his management had anything to do with what happened, quite the contrary I think they afforded JIMI every luxury until the money dried up, that last gig when the money boxes where stolen was probably by some debtors. Warner had the rights to his master tapes, JIMI was a perfectionist. its common stance when the money dries up who can maintain that lifestyle, Brian Jones went through that, The Beatles, (because John wouldn’t sign off) The Stones getting ripped from A.K and gag orders in place. In the end everyone just grabbed what they could steal…if you can picture a vulture scene here. that’s more than likely the way it was. M.J had big bills to pay the offshore account was for tax evasion., running the JHEx would cost a lot, the gear, the transpo, the studio, he was about the only real big live gig going at the time, The Stones where just getting started again, Black Sabbath, and Deep Purple, The Who, etc there weren’t many super acts back then didn’t Hendrix jam with Dave Mason? and there were a lot of tapes with other musicians as well, Maybe JH got tired burned out and just wanted a break, but the massive bills he couldn’t stop. I really don’t think there was foul play, everyone pretty much loved JH…R.I.P
You obviously have no idea what you are talking about…You are actually saying in public that the money dried up when you are referring to rock’s most famous superstar at the time who could simply schedule a show and get $100,000 for it in a finger snap…The money that was stolen at Fehmarn was stolen by violent biker gangs that may have been influenced by Intelligence as part of a program to shut down the 60’s…The money never dried up since Jeffery had stolen up to 5 million…Rumors like the money drying up or Jimi burning out up were perpetuated by those who covered-up Jimi’s murder in order to make it look like he withered away to a miserable end…But if you pay attention to what people close to Jimi were saying they said that was rubbish and Jimi was planning a big future without Jeffery…
If you think the evidence that was shown by Tony Brown and Kathy Etchingham in their books was simply a crass ploy to make money then you are ignorant of those persons and their motives…Kathy described in her book that the only reason she got in to it was to help her friend Noel Redding whom Monika sent lawyers after because Noel wrote in his book that Monika’s failure to call the ambulance aided in Jimi’s death…Monika was of course correct…Her failure to call the ambulance had nothing to do with Jimi’s death since he was murdered and calling an ambulance would have done no good…You slander good people and good motives since those books made little money…
Whoever you are you’re a fool who foolishly doesn’t realize how much evidence there is out there…Your entries are mostly shallow, vaporous, falsely-based speculation that miss most of the main evidence…You seem naively unaware that there are persons who interviewed those closest to the evidence and that there is serious evidence of Michael Jeffery being fired by Jimi 12 hours before Jimi’s mysterious death with everyone involved lying…The covert murder method of being deliberately incapacitated with pills and drowned in wine to make it appear as a reckless drug and alcohol death is right out of Jeffery’s Military Intelligence training and only a fool would ignore it or dismiss it in such a shallowly cavalier manner as you do…
Jeffery was never made to pay those off-shore tax bills after Jimi died nor were the true circumstances of Jimi’s death ever investigated while MI-6 Jeffery was alive…
No, if you bothered to study the real facts, Jimi finally made the move to fire Jeffery after realizing he was not working in his interests and was no good…You are just another idiot who seeks to blame the victim instead of honestly seeking the real cause that is quite easy to find with very little effort…Jimi fired Jeffery at 5pm on the 17th and 12 hours later he was dead…The two were not unrelated and anyone who doesn’t seek the facts in that direction is wildly derelict in their reasoning and obviously only seeking to prove their own denial…
More bogus lies coming from Buster. Jimi never fired Jeffery on September the 17th cuz he wasn’t able to due to the way Jeffery structured the contract. Jimi was trying to find a way out of the contract. He couldn’t fire Jeffery. So, there goes your phony murder motive.
its just my opinion m8, it sounds like you were at the scene when all this went down. maybe you were there when Barrabas was set free by the people instead of Jesus….lol…Whatever…its not hard to fathom J.H was an easy mark for outsiders to ride on his tails, even Clapton said something to that effect, he was not very careful who he hung out with. what would noel redding have to do with any of this?, Hendrix didn’t even like him, he had been fired in Denver….whatever I think he was just depressed and did not want to go on anymore. maybe your trying to sell a new movie, I don’t know but your facts seem hearsay to me and totally after the fact…by the with trolling people out is totally uncool, I don’t troll you because your op is diff I just don’t buy into the FBI;s war on rock and roll. The Who are still around right, and so are the Stones, Mac EC and others too…so…….Cheers JH RIP
You’re obviously ignorant…Noel was tightly involved with those in the know who trusted him because he was a band insider…Like I already said, if you bothered to educate yourself on the subject you would find that Noel wrote in his book that Monika contributed to Jimi’s death by failing to call the ambulance…Monika sent lawyers after Noel and threatened to take his house so Noel called Kathy Etchingham and she was the first person to talk to the police and ambulance attendants from that morning and found out Monika was lying about what happened and was covering-up a 5 hour clean up of the flat before calling the ambulance…It is in Kathy’s book ‘Through Gypsy Eyes’ and Tony Brown’s book ‘Hendrix The Final Days’…No, I wasn’t there but a lot of other people who Monika failed to mention were and you might find their accounts interesting if you ever bother to credibly look in to this…So far you haven’t…Plus the forensics we “there” so to speak and don’t change…
Since you obviously haven’t studied this at all and obviously don’t know anything about it I’m not sure why you think people would be interested in your un-informed opinion?…It is obvious to me that you are trying to hide behind calling all the evidence hearsay and think that is adequate to cover-up the pure evidence of murder that your posts haven’t managed to address…For instance you ignored my citation of Dr Crompton’s estimation of a 5:30am time of death based on the undigested rice in Jimi’s stomach…That’s just the opposite of hearsay and once inputted in to the real forensics from that morning that the British government never considered it proves homicide on a medical basis…It shows Jimi had the pills in him for no more than 2 hours and maybe as little as one hour…So there wasn’t either enough time or barbiturate to overdose, especially with Jimi who had a notorious tolerance for drugs…You didn’t answer the point…You can’t have 5 bottles of wine inside you with only a trace blood alcohol content, like Jimi had, innocently…You won’t be able to find any other case with those forensic particulars…It’s proof of murder…Jimi was physically drowned with wine…He did not die from the pills…
I don’t know what you mean by trolling…I post straight and serious and can back up what I write…
The bottom line is any accidental death scenario you post I can disprove with the real forensics…The British government never did this because they bought Monika’s lies and miscalculated the time of death by over 5 hours, which is a life time in forensics and invalidates the original cause of death finding at the Inquest…The British government is in contempt of its own law that forces a re-opening of the case when the original finding has been disproven…
Whatever, I mean lots of people were interviewed and all agree JIMI was not well, I guess ater 64 gigs in 65 days I don’t know how he did it. a lot o famous people testified he was worn out and tired of it all. besides that B.O.G was produced by AD at the record plant after Woodstock. So it wasn’t the JHEx alter Denver. A lot o peeps wanted to get together with JIMI then Ginger B.. However there’s something Eric B. said that bothers me, when he said Jimi was thrown around like a basketball….Hmmmm…
I mean its possible, but as a musician myself people get burntout.Whatever went on that sad morning im not sure if it can be legally dealt with Maybe one day …Anythings possible…Cheers
Thanks for your useless rumination that shows depraved indifference towards Jimi’s fate…You are probably British where it is a national policy to deny Jimi’s murder…Yes Jimi was burnt out…But only because he had been stressed to his limits by trying to battle with Jeffery in a secret cold war that was ongoing and explained both their actions during that time…If you want to quote Eric show the quote where he said “All I can say is the business killed Jimi”…Jeffery was the business…It isn’t hard to figure out…The reason there has been so much resistance to solving it is because the British government helped cover it up and they don’t want to admit it…Figure it out man…Monika said Jimi wore a crucifix to bed that night…And if you read the final ‘Story Of Life’ poem it is highly fatalistic and references Christ and his fate…
Jm’s Album Devotion was released in September 1970 im guessing the mixdown was a month or two beforehand. Brian Auger: In 1970, I was in New York and I got a call from John McLaughlin and he said, “You should come down and listen to the mix of my album, I know you’re going to really dig it”. So I went along. Then the door opens and who should come in but Jimi and his girlfriend. We hadn’t seen each other for a long time.
But the thing that bothered me was that his skin tone, and that of his girlfriend, it was kind of a pallid grey colour. And I thought, “Whoa, he doesn’t look too good here”. We were talking and he asked me, “Listen, Bri, can you stay and make an album with me?”. And I said, “I’d love to, man, but I have all these contracts that I have to fulfil, I just can’t do it”.
And then Jimi pulls out of his pocket this silver paper, opens it up, and there’s this brown heroin in there, and he takes a snort of that, gives it to his girlfriend, and then says, “Oh, sorry, Bri”, and tries to hand it to me. This is one of those moments I’ll never forget. I said to Jimi, “Hey Jim, I’m telling you, man, you’d better quit doing that stuff, as soon as you can, because it’s gonna kill you”. And he said this to me – I’ll never forget it – he said, “You know what, Bri, I need a lot more people around me like you”. That really touched me.
Some people insist on protecting Jimi’s reputation by denying he ever did heroin…As this story makes clear he did it recreationally because he had a lot of people pushing it around him including Devon and AD…I found a witness whose bass player walked by the dressing room and saw Jimi nodded with a needle still in his arm…That bass player woke Jimi up and fixed the situation and then lectured him on not doing heroin…Yeah, like many people in the 60’s Jimi flirted with it…However by the time of his death he kicked it and was probably witnessed withdrawing from it cold turkey by Kathy Etchingham at the Londonderry Hotel in London in late August 1970…In any case his autopsy made a special notation saying there was zero trace of heroin in the body and no sign of heroin use (needle tracks)…
the headlines stated Eric B was at the hospital when JH died…so did M.D…and BTW im not British. try reading the Original Headlines for once. “He was tossed around like a football’ was a direct quote from Eric B.
what people fail to realize that J.H is was and always be the G.O.A.T he set the trends and played like was a real electric church music, he was far beyond the blues. where he went is probably a better place, like he said, They don’t know, what i know, do you know? I dont know! and then laughs Timeless. many songs about him directly/ indirectly. even his songs tell a story about his life. every one that died that way all cry murder. I mean you can collect jars of earth where he stood or get a splinter of his guitar if it helps you to understand what he wanted people to know. all the books and movies are cool but to me never quite reach the mark as he could. people are gifted enough to play like him are the same as the aforementioned. everyone chases a legend. but he can never be caught. RIP JH
I don’t know what your agenda is but if you say Jimi went to a better place in front of the fact the world’s most magical guitarist had the rest of his life and career cut off by some of the worst concentrated evil forces all coming against him and what he stood for, there’s something seriously wrong with you…I don’t need to be told to read the headlines, I’ve already read them…I’m not the one who just a few posts ago was saying Monika might have been telling the truth when she said Jimi was still alive…Monika was lying in order to cover-up the fact Jimi died before she even called Burdon and they all knew it…What Monika was doing was covering-up the fact all the Hendrix office personnel who were there that morning knew Jimi was murdered and were covering up evidence in order to allow their lethally dangerous mob-connected, MI-6 boss, who now served as threat to them, time to get away and therefore be less of a threat to themselves…How quickly those mf-er’s turned on Jimi when it came to saving their own cowardly lilly-white English skin…I don’t know what point you think you are making and I personally find it sickening that some feckless Hendrix fans try to use Jimi’s magic to get around the Tough Reality of his murder…What those fools fail to realize is us who do justice for Jimi by getting the truth out about his fate are the ones who serve that magic the best and do righteous by it and how getting the record straight on his murder is in fact putting the final correct interpretation to that magic by allowing its final context…There’s too many fools out there trying to ride on Jimi’s magic in order to use Jimi to slide by with some personal agenda…I think those who truly understand Jimi and what he was will see how the action of this justice sets all that right…And how it was in tune to what Jimi was and what he magically hinted at was his predetermined fate…You can’t kill Jimi and what he stood for with murder…And you can’t deny it with foolishness…I think we’ve proven that by what we are doing if you really have ears for Jimi Hendrix…
“However by the time of his death he kicked it and was probably witnessed withdrawing from it cold turkey by Kathy Etchingham at the Londonderry Hotel in London in late August 1970″…you said this? anyone to cobberate this? i say this because some of the footage of JH didn’t strike me that way towards those time periods, like i have experienced that myself its easy to see. and secondly heroin in those days and his circle of friends would have been a near impossibility to kick, these days they have methadone to get you off. and it takes a while to get clean go ask any medical professional about it. as a month or 2 before in NYC you know what he was doing. its well documented. Also the newspaper said JH was talking with that Sarah Lawrence. “Im done in” September 5th 1970. and that’s what the papers reported it was heroin, then it was sleeping tablets, a restaurant bar still has that on the wall. But to me that’s what made him the greatest the ability to perform as a near perfectionist. im not condoning it by any means, American Indians use this manner to connect to the spirit world, have been for centuries… Peace
Are you by any chance R.H from P.O.T.C.S…or affiliated in anyway?
Iin the slight chance you are r, heard from the fam what your doing, i must say bro very very cool…dont get this, but..we go back a long way, and dont fault a bro who believes what he reads, lol…peace
Jimi had an almost supernatural power within him that explained his tolerance to drugs etc…If he snorted heroin recreationally he was probably titrating it or “chipping”…This would be easier to kick…Alan Douglas and Devon were over there so Jimi was probably dragged in to participating a few times…But the bottom line is Jimi’s autopsy made a special notation saying there was no heroin or signs of heroin use on the body…Heroin had nothing to do with Jimi’s death…
Jimi’s meeting with Sharon Lawrence was on the 16th…It might have been heroin that he was obviously high on…But it makes no difference because all that counts is the forensic period of the last 12 hours and his doings…
Please stop posting that Jimi died by accident…He was obviously murdered and you’re not helping Jimi by posting the false information his murderers got away with for decades…
No, I’m not RH…
I guess I’ve had a big disconnect regarding Jimi’s heroin use and I have naively dismissed it regardless of the fact that I have read accounts by people with first hand knowledge of his smack usage , i.e., Buddy Miles, Noel, Alan Douglas… heck two night’s before his death, Eric Burden and War refused to let him sit in because he appeard “smacked out”.
That being said, it brings a different light to the infamous Toronto bust and Jimi’s proclaimed innocence of posessing the H.
Do you guys believe that Jefferies did indeed set Jimi up for the Toronto bust by planting heroin in his flight bag or was it just another example of Jimi’s legendary absentmindedness ? ( remember how Jimi left the tape reels of the final mixes Axis in a taxi ?)
Don’t swing the pendulum too far in the other direction…Jimi was far too productive to be any heroin junkie…No way, no how…Jimi was literally the most productive 60’s rock figure who in 4 short years made enough music to fill a lifetime for other musicians…Look at the videos of him at the time…In no way was he strung-out or addicted and in no way does his recreational use change anything about him or the things that happened to him…
If you look at the Toronto bust the little pill bottle of heroin was sitting right on top of Jimi’s clothes when Canadian customs opened the suitcase…In other words it was planted there on purpose in order to be found…If you read the books Jimi said the word was out on the airplane prior to landing to check themselves for drugs and make sure they didn’t forget anything because a tip-off came in that they were going to be searched at customs…Afterwards Jimi said he thought Michael had something to do with it…Michael had a habit of not being around when he did something dirty and Jimi said Michael was no where to be found and was in Hawaii when he was busted…
The most probable explanation for Jimi’s heroin bust was Jimi was in the midst of trying to fire Jeffery and was making moves even back in May 1969…Bob Levine said “Jeffery handled Jimi like a CIA operation”…For some reason forcing Jimi in to total obligation to Jeffery to get him out of a possible 7 year jail sentence was in Jeffery’s interest and was in line with other such messages Jeffery sent to Jimi…Plus Jeffery’s control of Jimi that way was also in the interest of US Intel that would be quite happy seeing Jimi tainted with a heroin bust…Jimi broke up the Experience the following month in June…Figure out why people and don’t be thick…
There are a lot of conspiracy kooks who make up and believe any nonsense regarding Jefferies from planting drugs on Hendrix, from him being some super “secret agent”, to him murdering Hendrix. There is no real evidence to corroborate any of this, yet people still continue to spout bogus nonsense to make themselves sound credible or refusing to admit Hendrix died the way he did.
Jefferies would never “set up Hendrix” by planting drugs on him because he could have had a long prison sentence if he was convicted of possession of heroin. There as no guarantee that Hendrix would have beaten drug charges and Jefferies wouldn’t have risked losing his cash cow on some ridiculous stunt. No manager would ever consider dong anything of the sort yet conspiracy theorists run wild with the claim that Jefferies planted drugs on Hendrix in Toronto.
Hendrix was a heroin user, so it could have been his own he was trying to hide or a fan put it in his bag like he testified to.
This puts to bed another wacky conspiracy theory that holds no weight as conspiracy theorists use it as one of their ridiculous claims.
According to Trixie Sullivan, Jefferies wasn’t even in London at the time of Jimi’s death. Kathy Etchingham said in a radio interview that she never believed that Jefferies was implicated in Jimi’s death whatsoever. The mistake Jimi made was going back to the Samarkand with Monika and accepting those sleeping tablets he knew nothing about from, in reality, someone he did not know very well.
Jason is typical of the outdated deniers of 10 years ago…I call him an “internet expert”…You can tell from a person’s wording that they have no clue about the evidence and are just referring to their own overly-general denial rhetoric in their head…
Because Jason deals from the perspective of shallow knowledge and overly-general assumption he skips all the known history on this that was recorded in books and quotes from the persons involved and goes right to his own preconceived logic…Meanwhile more studied experts on the subject know that Jimi himself was quoted as thinking Michael had something to do with the heroin bust in Toronto…The small pill bottle of heroin was found by Canadian Customs sitting right on top of Jimi’s clothes when they opened the suitcase…Jimi said word was spread in the airplane before landing in Toronto that a bust was expected so make sure they had no drugs on them or in their bags…
What Jason ignores is the fact Jimi started his serious efforts to remove Jeffery from being manager in January 1969…The May 1969 bust was right in synch with Jeffery making a serious move on Jimi to make sure he was dependent on him…Jason is ignorant of Michael Jeffery’s MI-6 status and even mocks it while ignoring all the evidence for it…I’ve personally spoken to people who knew Jeffery and witnessed his Military Intelligence status directly…Jason should have spoken to Tappy Wright about it…Tappy told me things that left no doubt…Bob Levine was on record as saying “Michael ran Jimi like a CIA operation”…The best proof of Jeffery’s Military Intelligence status is the fact the British government withholds their National Service records for Jeffery and his documented Military Intelligence status…No one could bomb the harbor where the 6th Fleet was anchored and get away with it unless he was a high-ranking spook…Michael’s father even described the evidence for his son being a spook…He said Michael came home in civilian clothes on his furloughs when other boys who went in to the service with him came home in their uniforms…No serious Hendrix source denies Jeffery’s MI-6 membership – but more importantly methods…So Jason is ignorant of the 1960’s and Intel’s methods and influences to not realize the heroin bust was controllable at Jeffery’s spook level and wasn’t the risk he portrays…Jeffery’s Intel status was also confirmed in the way he himself died…To ignore it is to insult our intelligence…
It takes real nerve to enter dumb-down level denial on a website that contains some of the best proof for Jimi’s murder…I have proven Jimi was murdered in the forensic evidence…You cannot have 5 bottles of wine flooding your lungs and stomach and only have a 5mg blood alcohol content like Jimi did…The only way you can possess those forensic particulars is by homicide where the victim was physically drowned in wine…Despite the lowbrow grade analysis by Caesar Glebbeek, Jimi also did not have enough barbiturate in him to kill him – nor did he have the pills inside him long enough for the claimed cause of death…
If Jason dared try to describe how Jim died on a technical basis where he had to back it up with a detailed description and forensics I could disprove it using the real evidence the British government ignored…
Buster is the typical tin foil hatter conspiracy theorist. Buster reads tabloid journalism believing it as facts but has no actual proof. All these incredible claims made by only one source with no proof or evidence to prove it’s true. They string together this junk from unreliable sources one quote at a time until they develop a ridiculous conspiracy theory.
Buster is guilty of recreating his own fallacies instead of stating the actual facts. Jimi only felt Jeffery planted heroin cuz some people in his inner circle suspected he did. No proof and only an assumption. Jeffery wouldn’t risk sending Hendrix to prison for a decade on a fake drug bust. Makes no sense at all. Hendrix’s career would have been done and Jeffery would be out money. Another phony innuendo tin foil hatters use.
It was Chas Chandler who was talking to Jimi about being his manager in 1969. Jimi liked the idea of that but Jimi wasn’t searching for a new manager himself. Buster does not know the facts making up a conspiracy innuendos.
You spoke with Tappy Wright? This all makes sense now. Tappy Wright was a lying fraud who lied about Jeffery murdering Hendrix to sell his book. Wright has no credibility and you take him seriously. A total joke..
There is no evidence of Jeffery being in British Military Intelligence. This is another b.s. claim tin foil hatters use. Jeffery never advanced above the rank of private during his service.
Now we get the imaginary bottles of wine told by Bannister. Bannister was convicted for fraud as a doctor and lost his medical license. Same guy who read Electric Gypsy getting the wine idea from the book. He was facing a malpractice suit and needed a cover story. Banister also changed his wine accounts over the years. Another fraud you take seriously. Serious researchers don’t take lying frauds as their main sources when they have no evidence.
Buster’s 2 main sources of his murder conspiracy
Tappy Wright – admitted to lying about Jeffery murdering Hendrix to sell a book. No proof of it and only a false claim from Wright that happened before Jeffery’s death. No court would accept this as evidence.
Doctor Bannister- Fraud doctor who lost his medical license. No proof of any wine flooding Hendrix’s lungs and only his claim he saw it. No other doctor has seen flooding lungs. No report was ever filed about flooding lungs. No police were called about flooding lungs. No bottles wine ever existed.
2 fraud sources Buster uses for his fake conspiracy theory. Does anybody with an ounce of common sense believe this crap?
The jury acquitted Jimi so I am inclined to believe Jimi’s version of events where he said someone has thrown the drug into his bag. If I remember correctly from my reading I think Jimi said it was a woman.
Although he does not completely dismiss the “Jeffrey Motive” , Michael Fairchild seems to lean towards Hendrix’ roadies, Stickells and Barrett as being the most actively involved players at Monica’s flat. Fairchild also mentions the possibilty of the spouse of one of Jimi’s bedmates being a prime suspect. This caught my attention as author, David Henderson, also mentioned this scenario as a possible motive.
I am not too familiar with Fairchild and I am wondering about his credibility. Any thoughts regaridng him ?
https://www.rockprophecy.com/hendrix_death.html
I think Fairchild did dismiss any possibility Jeffery murdered Jimi…You have to be careful when saying things like “most actively involved players at Jimi’s flat”…The detail in that is important and necessitates answering exactly when were they active? …I’m not sure how much credible evidence Fairchild has behind either accusation outside the very inventive speculation he tends towards on his website…Let’s not forget Michael was fired 12 hours before Jimi’s death and had much more motive than anybody…And let’s not completely dismiss Tappy either…Michael also had a psychological profile of burning business interests that were failing…The most incriminating evidence all points to Jeffery and I think it’s a safe bet…Fairchild is probably the victim of his own biases…
Tappy admitted in an interview he made the whole thing up implicating Jeffrey in Jimi’s death in order to sell more books.
Not exactly…I was friends with Tappy for the last 5 years of his life…Apparently he told Bob Levine that he made the story up to sell his book…Sounds pretty damning except the evidence that Jimi was murdered doesn’t rely on Tappy…It exists outside of Tappy on its own and proves Jimi was murdered without Tappy…Plus there’s a lot more to Tappy than people realize and he might have heard about Jimi being murdered from other people than Jeffery but couldn’t say…I confronted Tappy on that once and he said nobody has ever said that to my face and if they did I would sue them…
Offhand remarks like this latest comment by Ivana Selvatino are especially irritating when they offer no substantiation. So Tappy, you say, made it up. You say he admitted doing so in an interview. Which interview was that, Madam? I want a day, a time, a place, an interviewer. Or else you are talking through your anal sphincter. Admittedly, Tappy did insert his claim at the end of a book totally peppered and spiced from beginning to end with jokey anecdotes, so it would be easy for someone to assume that this claim about Jeffrey was just another joke, but I have heard interviews with Tappy, and he claimed precisely the opposite.
It is entirely annoying to anyone who has read the literature on Jimi Hendrix to hear so many people chiming in with their heads totally up their asses, completely oblivious to what has been written about this for decades.
Page 165 of Monika Dannemann’s INNER WORLD OF JIMI HENDRIX:
“Jimi picked up the telephone and asked me to listen carefully to what he had to say to his lawyer, Henry Steingarten. He came straight to the point, telling his lawyer that he wanted to leave Jeffrey for good, no matter what the cost might be. Steingarten, who was in partnership with Jeffrey’s lawyer, asked Jimi if he had thought about the consequences, without making clear exactly what he meant by this. Jimi answered firmly that he had, and told his lawyer to proceed with his instructions.”
“I believe the circumstances surrounding his death are suspicious and I think he was murdered.”—Ed Chalpin, Proprietor of Studio 76
“I feel he was murdered, frankly. Somebody have him something. Somebody gave him something they shouldn’t have.”—John McLaughlin, Guitarist
David Henderson’s biography of Jimi Hendrix, ‘Scuse Me While I Kiss the Sky, which has been continually updated since it was first written decades ago, begins with suspicions regarding Jimi’s death, implying murder from page one to the end.
Of all the people commenting on this website, BUSTER is the ONLY ONE doing any credible investigation of the sources and the evidence, and he has actively and relentlessly interviewed the people still living who were then in a position to see what was happening.
Kathy Etchingham’s book THROUGH GYPSY EYES (a little paperback of which is today on Amazon for $148.99!) includes interviews with the two ambulence drivers who transported Jimi to the hospital. Neither had before or after that day ever worked together. They were interviewed separately, both said that nobody was in the apartment when they were there. Only the corpse of Jimi Hendrix, and neither of them had any idea who Jimi Hendrix was. There was no Eric Burdon, despite his own claims (and Burdon contradicts his account in his second autobiography DON’T LET ME BE MISUNDERSTOOD). There was no Monika Dannemann. Therefore, both Burdon and Dannemann have been less than forthright, to say the least.
John McDermott’s book on Jimi, SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT, also quotes a guest at a Track Records party the night of Sept. 16. Someone saw Mike Jeffrey there. Whether that’s true, I have no idea.
Bob Levine said Jeffrey’s ‘surprise’ that Jimi was dead did not at all seem genuine; rather, he felt it was highly suspicious.
The evidence, both factual and circumstantial, goes on and on, and BUSTER has done an excellent job in gathering and presenting it to those with the wherewithal, i.e. intelligence and open minds, to listen to it.
Fortunately, BUSTER’s views are getting out there, and it has been good to hear him articulate the evidence on radio stations from coast to coast.
Cheers,
Scott J. Thompson
Thank you for replying so quickly. I just want to say that I have been a fan of Jimi for a number of years. I have no personal connection with any Hendrix personnel and I mainly get my information from books. I found that some accounts seem more plausible than others. As I understand it Michael and Kathy got together to discuss the events of the morning Jimi died and found some incriminating evidence. I also do not find anything unusual in Barrett and Stickells collecting Jimi’s belongings as this would have been their duty. Monika panicked that morning and instead of calling for the ambulance called others first for help. This delay may have caused Jimi’s death or either he had been dead for a while. According to Monika the Samarkand hotel was meant to have been a refuge for Jimi but it seems that a number of people knew about it. I recall Slater saying that there was no food in the flat meaning that Jimi was not living there and Jimi had few belongings there; they were at the Cumberland hotel. I like to believe that Jimi returned to the Samarkand with Monika only in order to retrieve his guitar. It was not the cosy love nest Monika had us believe. As Mitch Mitchell stated Monika was not the great love of Jimi’s life and I remember Stickells mentioning that Monika exaggerated her affair with Jimi.
Michael Fairchild did a lot to put in to articulate writing the conflicts that emphasized the serious problems with the accounts of how Jimi died…He got together with Kathy Etchingham and was the first person to give form to the scary reality that was coming together from Kathy’s findings…This was an offshoot of Kathy backing Monika off her legal attack on Noel Redding for saying Monika delayed calling the ambulance…The reason Monika mentioned Barrett and Stickells only being interested in collecting notes and phone messages from the office is because Monika knew Barrett and Stickells were removing any possible evidence that connected Jeffery to the scene…They were working for Jeffery at that point and their sole duty was to remove any evidence that would connect Jeffery to the scene because they knew exactly what happened…Monika told them…Monika did not panic at all that morning…She’s one of the coolest customers I’ve ever seen under pressure…She was a good German spook and skilled at her craft…She tried to call Alvenia, not Burdon…She was going to try to deal with it with only Alvenia but was forced to deal with Burdon because Alvenia was sleeping over at his hotel…The reason Monika did not call for an ambulance is because she did not want to get trapped alone dealing with the authorities…She wanted to figure out how to get out of that situation which is why she involved others…It is important to realize this was calculated and not the result of any confusion or panic…She knew exactly what she was doing…Ivana – It is very important you clear the stories you are using to determine the facts from your mind…Those stories are all contrived lies…It took me many years to finally realize that and stop trying to figure things out by means of their lies…When Monika called Burdon she told him Jimi was dead…And I’m pretty sure she told him by whom…You need to read more on this than you evidently have because Kathy Etchingham consulted with the famous pathologist Dr Rufus Crompton who told her the undigested rice in Jimi’s stomach precluded any time of death later than 5:30am…That forensic determination was very accurate and proved that Monika called out not because Jimi was in trouble but because he was dead…If you then run the scenarios you know about through your mind with the understanding Jimi was dead when Monika called their behaviors make sense in that light and the rest is academic…I assure you the Samarkand Hotel was a death trap Jimi failed to detect and there is good reason to believe Monika was working with Jeffery at minimum and was possibly an agent (or pawn) of the Central Intelligence Agency…
Jimi was most likely the victim/participant in MK-Ultra mind control tactics while he was stationed in Kentucky. Michael Jeffery was clearly an intelligence operative, or at least someone who’d answer to those in those communities. He was more like a “handler” than a true manager to Jimi. He wanted to possess him and keep him “in line” with what the US/UK powers that be would desire. Supporting the Panthers, forming an all black group and then playing a prominent anti-Vietnam War concert with that group, was not exactly what Jeffery had in mind. No wonder Jimi was nefariously dosed with strong acid (or whatever it was) just before that show, effectively disbanding the Band of Gypsys. Jimi seemed to fire Jeffery the day before he died. Put the pieces together, people. And if you think the US/UK government and intelligence communities would have little interest in a “harmless” rock star like Jimi, read up on their interest in John Lennon, among many others. The truth is sadly obvious in this case, no way did Jimi accidentally OD and choke to death. Red wine was literally Everywhere on, in, and around him. The official story doesn’t add up.
Dear Scott. You are obviously very passionate about this subject. In no way did I mean to discredit Buster’s opinions. This website is meant to be a forum for people to give their interpretations. Accounts of Jimi’s death have changed and evolved over time mainly due to the work of Kathy Etchingham, and others. Please do not use vulgar language.
I did not use vulgar language. The words I used are used by doctors. My comment wasn’t published anyway. Moreover, I have many comments already on this site, and I have posted things on it for almost 10 years. I am fully aware of every single comment on it, and most of them are imbecilic. I hosted a radio program with Buster here in San Francisco.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 8:25 PM The Velvet Rocket wrote:
> Ivana Selvatino commented: “Dear Scott. You are obviously very passionate > about this subject. In no way did I mean to discredit Buster’s opinions. > This website is meant to be a forum for people to give their > interpretations. Accounts of Jimi’s death have changed and evolved over tim” >
I didn’t block any comments from you, Scott. I am not sure why something you posted did not appear, but I didn’t block or delete anything and I don’t have anything from you pending review (which is something that WordPress does, not me).
Hello Justin Ames, your photography is unbelievably amazing, and it was through you that I first became aware of this site. There should be an entire wing in SF MOMA dedicated to your photos alone. Scott
I can vouch for Scott’s credibility and professionalism…We did a radio show on Jimi’s murder in San Francisco live in the studio in summer 2016 at KPOO…It is just that so much stupidity has been aimed at those who try to educate people about the truth in this matter that patience wears thin…There’s a high good evidence vs corruption and indifference ratio that creates a lot of potential energy…
Buster and/or Scott please help me with piecing together the Monica timeline. She met Jimi in 1969 and if she was , indeed, a spook being infiltrated into Jimi’s inter sanctum , who then was her puppet master ? It seems that the Agency would be the more likely candidate than Jeffrey. MJ ,being Jimi’s manager, had unlimited and immediate access to him and it would seem redundant that Jeffrey would have to work someone in Jimi’s circle especially so far in advance of Hendrix’ death. So, if Monika was an Agency asset as opposed to a Jeffrey’s asset, wouldn’t Jeffrey be exonerated as the culprit ? It just seems to me that as the sequence of events unfolded, Jeffrey and the Agency would not be working in tandem. Monika’s involvement is undeniable but it seems like she would be an Agency asset rather than a MJ asset.
We’re obviously through the veil or looking glass when we get to this level…Shadows appear as real and ghosts interchange forms…Keep in mind Hendrix friends and office members said Jeffery was constantly trying to recruit them to spy on Jimi…In a way it doesn’t matter if it was Jeffery or CIA who controlled Monika, she was operating under their instruction and for their purposes and it played out directly the night Jimi died…The deeper you get in to this the more the level of covert practices involved with Monika suggests CIA sponsorship…The better you understand the evidence the more you realize that after Jimi fired Jeffery on the 17th CIA’s and Jeffery’s interests merged and became the same…However Jeffery had the immediate motive for murder – which, if you understand how CIA operates, would also be a sign of their classic manipulation and plausible deniability…It would not be in error to lay Jimi’s murder squarely on CIA’s doorstep…Jimi’s FBI file clearly shows an attempt to classify him for special handling..
I’ve read she met Jimi in 1969 and then reappeared again in London when Jimi was there as “his fiance in Sept ’70. Jimi had his own place to stay but yet he was over at her’s to “get away” from people. Odd behavior for Hendrix which is suspicious indeed.
It is my understanding that author Tony Brown had a significant amount of information regarding Jimi’s death that was not released in his book, “Final Days”. Was he planning to write a new book which would have contained this information or perhaps update and re-release “Final Days ” ? Regardless, is anybody privy to this info ?
I tried to contact Tony’s wife Carol…My source told me some other Hendrix information managers tried to get Tony’s archives from Carol but she told them no…That she intended to place it in a dumpster because she considered Tony’s Hendrix interests responsible for their marriage problems…I guess someone should have tried to get a court injunction to keep her from doing that but apparently she succeeded…The woman was a criminal…Carol is since dead…You have to understand that in Britain there’s always the possibility that Carol was acting for other interests…I don’t know anything about any other information Brown intended to release, however from reading his book ‘Final Days’ I would assume he would have been the one to release the next book that would have covered Jimi’s murder…Especially after Tappy’s public admission…I believe the likelihood Tony Brown was murdered to be high because he existed in British jurisdiction and was a clear and present danger to those who killed Jimi because of his ability to force a case…These people had killed before…
Hi Buster
I haven’t seen you on here for ages and I got a email the other day ..I am on the same email address j.brown96 if this is you buster can you send me a email
Thank you
Joyce
Joyce – I sent an e-mail last weekend…No response…
Regarding the reliability of MS. Trixie Sullivan, I have less confidence. Number One: his name is Mike Jeffrey, not Jeffries. It is incredible how few people get his name right!
Second: MS. Sullivan was Jeffrey’s ‘gal Friday’ and she never puts Jeffrey in a bad light. For example, she does not hesitate to contradict Buddy Miles regarding the Band of Gypsies Madison Square Garden concert, shifting blame towards Buddy, as if Jeffrey had done Jimi’s bidding by allegedly dosing Jimi and ruining the prrformance. I am curious what she would say regarding the supposed faux-abduction and rescue Jimi suffered, supposedly engineered by Jeffrey, according to David Henderson’s biography.
It was MS. Sullivan who confirmed that Jeffery was out of the country at the time of Jimi’s death. Jeffery never abducted Jimi that’s been a long untrue myth.
Just because Jeffery was out of the country doesn’t mean he didn’t arrange Jimi’s death…Jeffery was away and un-findable when Jimi got busted for heroin at Canadian customs…If anything, being away is a sign of Jeffery’s modus operandi…Jason…You make some very definite comments but appear to have very little credible background on this…I have researched the kidnappings extensively…Rolling Stone Magazine reporter Jerry Hopkins wrote about the kidnappings in his book…I interviewed office members and friends and they said the atmosphere in Jeffery’s office during the kidnapping was unserious to the point that it was suspicious….Even Jimi told people he thought Jeffery was behind the abductions…If you research the mafia Salvation Club no wannabee mobster would dare kidnap Jimi and try to coerce his contract without permission from mob higher-ups or they would be killed…You speak as if you know what you are talking about but credible research shows that Jeffery probably arranged the kidnapping just like he did the heroin bust in order to intimidate and control Jimi who was trying to get away from him…
Touche’Buster on The Jeffery Viewpoint… I’m In Total Agreement 👍👍
MS. Sullivan and Bob Levine said Jeffery was out of the country. What’s so strange about that? That was the 60’s and 70’s. People didn’t have emails or cell phones then. Mobsters? Why are you talking mobsters? Are you saying Jimi was abducted by mobsters? Jeffery never abducted Jimi that’s been a long untrue myth.
Now Buster’s story changes. Buster first claimed that “Jeffery murdered Hendrix himself” to “Jeffery arranged Jimi’s death”. Which is it Buster? Big difference and total reversal from “Jeffery murdered Hendrix himself”. When these conspiracy theorists are proven wrong they add a new conspiracy like Buster has done. The phony claim of “Jeffery murdering Hendrix” by Tappy Wright was proven to be a lie cuz Jeffery was in Spain. Now comes a new phony claim from Buster that “Jeffery arranged Jimi’s death”. No proof of this exists but Buster spins a new conspiracy to keep this fairy tale going. Your case has already unraveled Buster.
is there an official time that Jimi was seen leaving the party to where he went back to Monika’s flat and when she started phoning people or is it just speculation with no confirmed time?
Angie Burdon said that Jimi arrived at Pete Cameron’s party about 11.00 pm and Tony Brown has Jimi arriving back at the Samarkand about 3.00 am. Eric Burdon says he received a phone call in the early hours of the morning around dawn from Monika.
Jimi left at around 3AM and got back to the Samarkand about 10 minutes after 3…Dr Rufus Crompton, top coroner in Britain at the time, told Kathy Etchingham that the undigested rice in Jimi’s stomach at his autopsy showed Jimi died no later than 5:30am…This was uncannily accurate because it is the real time that Monika started calling people…Only fools don’t realize Monika called people because Jimi was dead – not because he was struggling…She then had to lie about the real time all this happened and push it ahead 5 hours to 11am in order to cover-up…Common sense tells you they would not have cleaned the flat for 5 hours with Jimi laying struggling and choking to death on the bed…Do us a favor Jason…Learn more about this before entering ignorant doubt…Jimi was killed by being force-drowned with wine and the undigested rice forensically locked-in the time for that at 5:30…Scotland Yard has been exerting its efforts to criminally avoid this instead of doing its trusted duty…They are no different than murdering Nazis in their corrupted complicity…Then and now…
Buster, don’t call me ignorant and not credible. That’s not cool. Everybody has the right to speak their mind on this page.
Jason – what is not cool here is having scant knowledge of what you are talking about, like you obviously do from your entries, and coming in and pretending you are on equal par with one of the foremost authorities on the subject..You first waded-in by defending Jeffery on the Toronto heroin bust…That bust and its motives are suspicious and even Jimi himself was quoted as telling people privately that Jeffery was behind it…You called people who intelligently analyzed this “kooks”…Next you spoke with one-line authority saying Jimi was never abducted…People who have researched this found that Jimi was kidnapped and Michael Jeffery almost certainly had something to do with it…Jeffery’s unholy relationship with the Gambino crime family Salvation Club mafia was documented when he used them to intimidate Jimi in to playing that mob-connected club that Jimi didn’t want to play…I have seen a video from an unreleased documentary of the actual Lucchese crime family members who were involved describing Jimi’s so-called rescue from this bogus kidnapping…There were other witnesses too…It is somewhat disingenuous to say this is an issue of “the right to speak one’s mind” when the clear issue here is your reckless denial of better-researched evidence and your failure to credibly respond to it…Your posts seem to be mocking some Jeffery-connected aspects of Jimi’s death and agreeing with others…You should learn about what you are talking about before offering public advice…
Buster, you’re one of foremost authorities on the subject? By reading the same books like others do? I disagree. Jeffery wouldn’t risk sending Jimi to prison for a decade on a set up. That makes no sense. Jeffery was out to make money. Not lose money on a risky drug bust that could go bad. Hendrix’s career would have been done. Jeffery had nothing to do with Jimi’s abduction. That’s been a long untrue myth. I read the story of who was behind it. Perhaps you should learn about what you are talking about before offering the wrong public advice.
David Henderson writes in his book that Monika had friendships/relationships with other black musicians before Jimi came along. Monika states that Jimi went from table to table announcing their engagement at the Speakeasy in London but no-one could recall this occurring. Eric Burdon said to Kathy Etchingham that Monika would never give up trying to convince others that she was Jimi’s fiancé. I think Pat Hartley sums it up best when she said that Jimi was in love with his music. He enjoyed the company of women but I don’t think there was anyone serious.
I have just finished reading an article titled the death of Jimi Hendrix. Jimi had 18 times the normal dosage of Vesperax in his system enough to render someone unconscious and seriously inhibit any coughing reflex. The ambulance officer Mr. Saua stated that there was dry black and brown vomit on Jimi’s clothing and pillow. Dr. Bannister is the only one to mention red wine, and this was said many years later. He also talks about Jimi being an unusually tall man. Noel Redding states that Jimi was not a tall man. According to the article Bob Levine questioned Tappy Wright about his claim that Jeffrey murdered Jimi and Wright admitted he made the whole thing up in order to sell books. Trixie Sullivan and Jim Marron both said Jeffrey was in Majorca Spain at the time of Jimi’s death. The article concludes with you can’t believe everything you see and hear can you?
Yes, only vomit and no wine.
Jason – What are your sources and reasoning for the absolute statement that there was no wine and only vomit?…I spoke to Dr Bannister personally and he told me that Jimi was drowned in at least 5 bottles of wine…He said when he opened Jimi’s mouth to resuscitate him that there was wine up to the throat…A clever detective would see that the amount of wine was wine that was poured in to Jimi until he could hold no more…This is called “overkill” in criminology to make sure the job was done…That same smart detective would realize that for wine to be up to the mouth would mean everything beneath it was flooded and that the volume of that flooding would be about 5 bottles of wine…Again, that same sharp detective would look at the wording of the ambulance men when they described the grotesque amount of vomit at the death scene as being “pools of vomit”…”Pools” suggest a liquid nature…
Buster, do you have a video of your interview with Dr. Bannister? Monika was the first one to talk about wine in Electric Gypsy. She said she wiped Jimi’s face with wine. Bannister read the book getting the wine idea from that. In 1993 Bannister talked about wine to cover himself cuz Monika said all the doctors should be sued for malpractice. That was a cover story. Where was the wine on September 18, 1970? Not a single person then said anything about wine.
What are my sources and reasoning of no wine and only vomit? Medical expertise and the determined cause of death. Inhalation of vomit cuz of a drug overdose. Bannister is the only one who talks of wine with no specific proof of what he says. What makes him more credible over anyone else?
5 bottles of wine? That’s a lot of wine. Did Bannister alert the police about this? What did he do with the 5 bottles? Do you have a video of the Bannister interview?
Ivana – You have to be very careful about the source of any articles on Jimi’s death and their agenda…I have read that article and the author is not a credible source on Jimi’s death…What happened was some ballsy people who had a conflict of interest in being sources for Hendrix music, memorabilia, and photos didn’t want Jimi’s murder and its ugly consequences to mar their little corner of the Hendrix universe so they sold him down the river and wrote uncredible articles like the one you quoted to justify it…I’ve dealt with those people and I know who they are…They made no honest attempt to look at the evidence and were only looking for the excuses…I have extensively researched the subject and as damning as the 18 times the normal dose sounds medical science shows that it wasn’t enough to kill Jimi due to his famous tolerance…After Jimi’s death Monika hired some German doctors to see if her pills would have killed Jimi…They came back and said no exactly for the reasons I am citing here…9 Vesparax tablets was not enough barbiturate to reach lethal dose nor did Jimi have the pills in him long enough…If you read this thread you will see it has already been explained…It is false to say Dr Bannister was the only person to mention the red wine…Dr Bob Brown walked along side the gurney as it was wheeled in to the hospital and he said Jimi was beyond saving and had obviously had too much wine…The Chief Coroner in the London Coroner’s Office, Dr Gavin Thurston, told reporter Jack Meehan that “Jimi’s stomach contents showed that a large amount of red wine had been imbibed”…Lastly, a friend of mine recorded the second doctor, Dr Siefert, on video in the 1990’s saying Jimi was covered in red wine…After Tappy Wright’s book came out Siefert was then quoted as saying “I detected no alcohol on Jimi”…Siefert had obviously reversed because he realized his witnessing had become dangerous and he worked in the city where the government that was covering it up was based…Proof of the wine is seen in Scotland Yard’s failure to seek out the nurses when Kathy Etchingham petitioned them to re-open the case…What was their reason for never even interviewing Dr Banister?…I was a personal friend of Bob Levine and a few months before his death I video-ed him saying he suspected Jeffery in Jimi’s death…The bogus writer of the misleading article you quoted failed to inform you that Bob Levine came out in the 1990 book ‘Setting The Record Straight’ and listed reasons why he suspected Jeffery in Jimi’s death…Tappy said he spoke to Bob about Jeffery’s confession when it happened and Bob responded “You better keep your mouth shut”…
Thanks for your post Ivana. Tin foil hatter like Buster don’t like when their phony claims are refuted by facts. They become defensive and go on the attack attacking your credibility and the facts that refute their garbage. You can see that in all Buster’s posts.
Buster attacks the facts and offer a fairy tale spin of his own fallacies to defend his phony conspiracy theory.
Buster makes up the fabricated lie that Jimi Hendrix was an “immortal Superman” to drug tolerance withstanding any size amount. This is the biggest bunch of bunk he tries to sell. Dr. Rufus Crompton and any medical expert would agree that 18 times the amount is a lethal dosage for any human known to mankind. Buster sells this nonsense cuz it refutes his phony murder claim where he needs his imaginary wine to be the cause of Hendrix’s death. They will fight tooth and nail to claim drugs were not lethal to Hendrix.
Buster now lies with more fabricated claims and makes up stuff that doesn’t exist.
Dr. Gavin Thurston never said never said “that a large amount of wine was imbibed.” That was a second hand quote from Sharon Lawrence’s book where she is already guilty of making up quotes.
Dr. Martin Siefert never said Hendrix was “covered in red wine”. Siefert said “there was a good bit of mess/” “Mess” does not indicate wine. Hendrix had vomit all over him. That is “mess”. Quit lying Buster. Siefert later confirmed he saw no alcohol on Hendrix.
Bob Levine never stated Hendrix was murdered. Bob defended Jeffery in several interviews stating Jeffery was innocent.
Tappy Wright is a lying fraud so more lying quotes from him is a joke.
But was Michael Jeffery really in Spain?
In McDermott & Kramer’s HENDRIX: SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT Bob Levine is quoted with regard to Jeffery’s whereabouts.
pp. 287-288:
“Back in New York, the question of Jeffery’s whereabouts remained unanswered. ‘We tried calling all of Jeffery’s contacts – from [his club] Sgt. Pepper’s to the Hotel Victoria in Majorca – trying to reach him,’ remembers Bob Levine. ‘We were getting frustrated because Hendrix’s body was going to be held up in London for two weeks and we wanted Jeffery’s input on the funeral service. A full week after Hendrix’s death, he finally called. Hearing his voice, I immediately asked what his plans were and would he be going to Seattle. ‘What plans?’ he asked. I said, ‘The funeral.’ ‘What funeral?’ he replied. I was exasperated: ‘Jimi’s!’ The phone went quiet for a while and then he hung up. The whole office was staring at me, unable to believe that with all of the coverage on radio, print and television, Jeffery didn’t know that Jimi had died. He called back in five minutes and we talked quietly. He said, ‘Bob, I didn’t know,’ and was asking about what had happened. While I didn’t confront him, I knew he was lying because I had spoken to people who saw him at a party Track Records had staged in London the night before Hendrix died. I knew everybody who had attended, from Douglas’s pair – Stella and Colette– to Devon, as well as friends from Harold Davison’s office. It was impossible for him to have slipped incognito into Spain without hearing about Jimi’s death.”
Whether this is an accurate report or not, it seems clear that John McDermott and Eddie Kramer do not generally partake in this conversation.
Since Buster commented on this in 2011, he has had more insight into the matter, I’m sure.
What I have a problem with are posthumous accusations regarding Jeffrey’ s involment in Jimi’s death. These suspicions should have been raised while he was alive. With various people making accusations against Jeffrey I am surprised that his estate or the Hendrix family for that matter did not seek legal advice. Perhaps posthumous defamation laws differ.
They really should. No evidence but only false accusations that have been proven to be false.
Jason seems to be all over the place…In one post he’s saying the evidence is highly suspicious and in another he’s issuing one-liner absolutes saying there’s no evidence…No serious researcher defends Michael Jeffery or says he’s the victim of false accusations…The best evidence makes it pretty apparent that Jimi fired Jeffery in front of Monika at about 5pm on Thursday the 17th and was dead 12 hours later under mysterious circumstances with everyone lying…What I have a problem with are persons ignoring a full case of evidence lengthily explained in a website comments section and coming back and pretending they are credibly addressing the issue…The Hendrix estate ended up with Al Hendrix and his lawyer Leo Branton…Al was an uneducated landscape maintenance man who was mainly interested in not being ripped-off of what little money Jeffery didn’t steal…It wasn’t really a fair battle with Jimi’s friends all betraying him and not speaking up…A fair evaluation is Jeffery knew the governments involved would back him up and he knew how to intimidate people…It isn’t really a genuine suggestion to say the same governments that were involved in the cover-up were going to honestly respond to inquiries…Meanwhile Kathy Etchingham had managed to reveal some shocking new evidence and she DID ask the government to answer it…So why didn’t they?…
Buster, Jeffery was confirmed to be in Spain by two people. He couldn’t have killed Hendrix. That is an absolute. The accusation against him is inaccurate. That’s what I’m saying. It’s pretty apparent you say? Should you know for sure before you go hurling accusations against people? That’s not credible research as far as I’m concerned.
Jason – it is clear to me that you know very little about this…It is silly to try and use word games to get around Jeffery’s obvious motive…Just because Jeffery wasn’t there doesn’t mean he didn’t have Jimi killed by others…The method of murder points to Jeffery because as a member of British Military Intelligence he would know how to kill covertly in order to make it appear as an accidental drug and alcohol overdose…Jeffery had the motive because Jimi fired him 12 hours before his death with everyone lying…Jeffery would have done jail time or been killed himself for leading Jimi’s lawyers back to the money Jeffery stole and where it was kept…And it is very likely Jeffery was also killed for the same reason…Saying Jeffery was in Spain as a response to all of the above is rather weak…
Buster, it is very hard to have a case when your main suspect was in Spain confirmed by two sources. How does that explain Tappy Wright’s story?
Buster is spinning this really hard. Why is it “rather weak” to say Jeffery was in Spain Buster? It is a fact Jeffery was in Spain. Do you not deal with the facts? Seems to me you only dabble in false claims to support your fake murder conspiracy. Buster claims it is “rather weak” to say Jeffery was in Spain cuz it weakens his fake murder conspiracy. Sorry, there was no “murder” and nothing points to Jeffery except innuendos by you that cannot be proven. Jeffery had no motive or the means to arrange a “long distance murder in a span of 12 hours. The British intelligence nonsense and the accusation that Jimi fired him is fake as well with no proof. Nothing but fake claims that don’t exist. Sorry.
Michael Jeffery was the victim of a false accusation Buster. Tappy Wright made a false accusation against Michael Jeffery to sell his book. Tappy Wright admitted he lied about Jeffery murdering Hendrix. Is that not a false accusation in your eyes? You’re obviously not a serious researcher since you deny this important fact. Even you admitted Jeffery was in Spain but added a new conspiracy that “Jeffery arranged Jimi’s death” with no facts or proof. So, let’s see the facts Buster. Show us how “Jeffery arranged Jimi’s death” as you claim with some evidence. You’re a “serious researcher” as you claim so you should have this evidence? Correct?
Bob Levine interview for Music Radar 2011. “ despite the allegations that have recently been made, I need to set the record straight once and for all. Jimi died an accidental death, but he was definitely not murdered- not by Michael Jeffrey, his UK manager, and certainly not by anyone connected to him. The whole thing is one giant lie.” The Attorney General could not find any incriminating new evidence to add to the story. The problem was with Monika’s ever changing story, and her defamatory statements about Kathy Etchingham. It would seem that these things sealed her fate. Later on the Hendrix family did very well for themselves in business due to Jimi’s catalogue.
Ivana – If you weren’t ignoring everything I’m writing and just fishing for denial quotes from Bob Levine you would understand that Bob Levine was over in New York when Jimi died…He was the type of guy who didn’t want to get involved and if giving the media a quote that Jimi wasn’t murdered was what they wanted to hear he would say it…However I had several years of private conversations about the evidence with Bob and he started to realize it was real…He told me in one phone call that I should take my evidence to the FBI…If you had a better grasp of this you would realize that Bob gave detailed descriptions in the book ‘Setting The Record Straight’ that couldn’t be denied so easily…The reporters who got those quotes from Bob were only looking for those quotes and nothing else…They should have asked Bob about his previous statements in ‘Setting The Record Straight’…Who was the journalist for Music Radar and how much real research did he do?…If the British Attorney General Nicholas Lyle could not find any new evidence it was probably because he wasn’t looking…I mean how dare you write that when one look at Kathy Etchingham’s petition to Lyle shows that she proved Monika was lying about the times involved by about as much as 6 hours…If you studied this better and read Kathy’s book she wrote that the police detectives who interviewed the main witnesses came back and told her “every one of them is lying”…Lyle lied…The evidence Etchingham discovered exposed the true timeline of that evening and the fact Jimi died at 5:30am according to famous London pathologist Rufus Crompton…If you input the forensics at Jimi’s autopsy in to that true timeline it proves homicide…All you are doing is quoting the liars and people covering-up Ivana…I befriended Bob Levine right after that Music Radar interview for the last 5 years of his life and here is his real opinion on Jeffery and his involvement in Jimi’s death…Watch it and you will see how persons like yourself have worked directly against Jimi Hendrix and his interests and misled the public on his death: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eSp1DPjp_k&t=15s
Ivana, Bob Levine did set the record straight. He refuted and exposed Tappy Wright’s lies. Tappy Wright was another fraudster con artist who made up lies against Jeffery to make money off Hendrix. Aleem Twins fake story of waking up on a couch to hear Jeffery and Monika plotting evil deeds was even worse. Tin foil hatters use their lying quotes to compile their fake murder conspiracy. It’s all a big fat joke.
Bob Levine sets the record straight about Rock Roadie
By Bob Merlis
I want to set the record straight. Michael Jeffery was the Animals manager. He hired me to be their US tour manager. I was with Chas Chandler when he saw Jimi at the Cafe Wha before he took him to London. I had met Jimi once before but never knew it. I broke up a fight backstage between Jimmy and Little Richard a year or so before at the Paramount Theatre [New York, April 1965] and didn’t realize it had been him until he told me that he had met me before. He recalled the fight and I couldn’t believe it.
Michael Jeffery and Chas Chandler formed a company [Jeffery & Chandler, Inc.] hereafter and hired me [in early 1968] to run their US office (on 37th Street in New York). James “Tappy” Wright was the roadie for the Animals but occasionally he filled in to work in that same role for Jimi in UK/Europe before Eric Barrett was hired [in May 1968]. Gerry Stickells was the road manager for Jimi for his entire career. No one else.
Tappy was a longtime friend and it was only because of that I agreed to speak with him for his book [Rock Roadie]. In all of the years since Jimi’s death I have only granted interviews about my work for Jimi to John McDermott and to Tappy.
I didn’t think anything further about Tappy’s book project until I started to get calls attempting to verify what he said. I couldn’t even read his book because I am now legally blind and it is difficult for me to read small type. I couldn’t believe what people were telling me. Jimi was murdered!!?? Total bullshit.
I had someone read the book to me and I was furious. He basically used my name on every third page. I called Tappy up at the end of last year. “Why did you tell that [“murdered by manager”] story?” “Well, Bob, I needed a handle for my book.” I asked him why he made up all of the other crap throughout the book and Tappy told me, point blank: “Bob, I needed a handle! People don’t know me or understand how I can tell the story.”
I asked Tappy directly: “How did you get this information?” He said he spoke to the retired Medical Examiner [John Herbert Bannister; see footnote #2] in Australia. I find that totally far fetched. [Tappy] told me that it wouldn’t matter; none of this would hurt Jimi and Michael any. They were dead and the press would pick up on the controversy. It would help sell books for him. He felt that nobody would challenge him on this because all of the key players were now deceased. I was furious at this attitude….
I was in touch with Michael Jeffery on the 17th of September 1970 to discuss the schedule for Electric Lady Studios. I called him at “Hotel Victoria” in Majorca, Spain. I called from my office at the studio. We spoke about many things including Jimi returning to Electric Lady Studios and how we were going to schedule sessions for Carly Simon. Carly was going to be working with Eddie [Kramer] in Studio A and Michael and I needed to discuss how this was going to be managed so that there would be no conflicts with Jimi and Eddie for recording time.
We went over a bunch of things but I clearly remember that this was something we spoke about. Electric Lady was starting to get busy with outside clients and we knew we had to manage Jimi’s time so that there would not be any conflicts. We didn’t want him coming back to finish the record and not be able to get into the studio or have Eddie tied up with someone else and not be available to him.
Before we finished the call, Michael told me that he had planned to go boating the next day. At this very time Jimi was in London and that is where he met his demise.
Jeffery would have had to have been in two countries at once and he was not. Jimi was like a goldmine. The notion that he was more valuable to him dead is utterly ridiculous… [Jimi] was loyal even if he was unhappy with decisions that Michael may or may not have made.
Jimi and I were close. We understood one another. I will give you one example. When I had the flu and couldn’t get out of bed, Jimi came to the door and served me. He was that kind of a guy. Very caring. He trusted me and I admired and respected him as a musician. As a person, he was a great guy to be around; he cared so much about the world. He was a very unmaterialistic guy. He was a great guy; many people didn’t get to know him that way.
It’s so unfair to put this guy in the middle of a made-up story. I was angry with that crap Charles Cross tried to put over in his book [Room Full Of Mirrors: A Biography Of Jimi Hendrix] but this Tappy business takes the cake. Don’t believe a word of it!
Jason I had decided not to post anymore comments but thanks for your reply. Too many people, I think, hold on to already disproven “truths” in regards to Jimi’s life and death. What I dislike the most is people coming out with downright lies about Jimi and his personnel decades later. To often it seems hearsay, gossip, innuendo rules the day.
This interview is more about Caesar Glebeek. Bob Levine says maybe, it’s possible Jeffrey was involved. He also says it happened a long time ago and he does not want to relive the past. I have a problem with the interviewer who tries to get Bob Levine to talk about Jeffrey and his supposed involvement in Jimi’s death. I don’t find anything in this interview that is startling. We all know Monika called the ambulance five hours later; this information is not new. As I have said previously Monika kept changing her story about the time she woke up and noticed Jimi was in trouble. The problem with any new investigation would be that the main players are all dead. At least Kathy tried along with Michael Fairchild and Dee Mitchell to get to the bottom of what really occurred that morning. Kathy does not buy into Jeffrey having anything to do with Jimi’s death. She states this in a radio interview.
Ivana, what you say about Kathy “not buying into Jeffery having anything to do with Jimi’s death” is true. BUT, what Kathy isn’t aware of, is what Albert Allen (him and his twin brother Arthur are known today as the Aleem Twins) witnessed at Electric lady Studios right after Jimi had died that proved the collusion between Monika Dannemann and Mike Jeffery. This info can be found in the Aleem Twins book “Ghetto Fighters in Harlem World” and completely overrules Kathy’s beliefs regarding Mike Jeffery.
Someone’s accusation is more powerful than Kathy who did serious research and knew the man personally? Aleem twins were out to cash in on a book. Kathy’s research and knowing him personally trumps that. Sounds like you’re being biased against Kathy to protect your own personal beliefs.
Jason — sounds like you are talking out of your anal sphincter just like Scott Thompson said. The Aleem Twins knew Jimi personally before and after his rise to stardom and for a lot longer than Kathy did. Sounds like your biased towards the Twins to protect YOUR personal beliefs & what they say about Jeffery doesn’t fit your phony narrative. What one of the Twins witnessed at Electric Lady Studios shortly after Jimi died trumps Kathy’s beliefs about Jeffery. And you’ve ignored the fact that Buster had spoken directly to the Twins.
Jason – you forfeit credibility when you paint the Allen Twins as only wanting to cash in by selling a book…Kathy only goes as far as Monika and goes no further…In no way is Kathy end-all proof that Jeffery is innocent…But your opinion of the Allen Twins is way off the mark…Have you even read their book?…Those brothers are just the opposite of only interested in the money and are some of the most dedicated and reverent of Jimi’s personal friends…If you read their book and knew of them and their thoughts towards Jimi you would know that they appreciate Jimi at a deeper spiritual level that Kathy seems to miss all together…What you are doing there is accusing Albert Allen of lying and making up a story in order to sell a book…You just put yourself outside of the game because anyone who knows Albert would know he was telling the truth and would be one of the last people to make up something like that…Not only that but there are other events connected to his witnessing that confirm it…For instance Albert identified the photographs Monika took at the Samarkand of Jimi before they came out, proving his witnessing was true…Plus Monika herself wrote of that visit to Jeffery at that time but it wasn’t made public until her book came out in 1995…I’m afraid the bias comes from Kathy’s side and she is reticent to accuse the British government…
No need for petty insults Flyswatter. I had no idea Buster spoke to them. Jimi knowing the Aleem Twins for a lot longer than Kathy doesn’t make them more credible. Is that what a serious researcher measures credibility on? I don’t think so. No way Jose. That’s a joke. Kathy was busy getting the facts to reopen Jimi’s case while the Aleem twins were writing fiction. Facts trumps fiction. Joker claims he woke up from a nap on a couch right when Jeffery and Monika were plotting evil deeds. C’mon. Give me a friggin break. Total fake story there.
Buster, I disagree. Kathy has the facts and the personal experience of knowing Jeffery. Aleem has only a story to tell with nobody else to confirm if it’s true. Everybody told a story for a book to cash in. Kathy just went on evidence and facts. Kathy’s evidence is what shed light on the whole case. if not for her we would have been in the dark about most everything that day.
No Jason — you really are talking out of your anal sphincter & I don’t care if your feelings are hurt by having that fact pointed out to you. All you are offering are the proverbial stupid one-line dismissals & if you were to say those things directly to TaHarqa Aleem’s face (he was known to Jimi as Albert Allen), he would very quickly straighten you out. What he witnessed can’t be made up. Your stupid one-line dismissal of “fake story” is just that, because it doesn’t fit your narrative and you can’t refute it or prove it false. Several people were told of this witnessing right away, including Buzzy Linhart, who made reference to it long before the Twins published their book, same as what was told to Roger Pomphrey in 1997.
Buster never said that Kathy’s research didn’t shed light on the Jimi Hendrix death case. What he said was “In no way is Kathy end-all proof that Jeffery is innocent”. You are ripping things out of context there.
All your posts are proving is that aren’t knowledgeable or credible to the subject at all. But, by all means, keep them coming because I can always use a good laugh & will have no problem refuting them — just like I’ve already done with your “no wine” narrative by showing that it wasn’t Dr. Bannister that first made reference to red wine, it was Gavin Thurston (try looking down).
In my opinion Jason is an “internet expert” who knows nothing about the subject and has done no research…From reading his posts what Jason is doing is saying his strawman-like forcing of direct quotes from Tappy can be used to deny the rest of the evidence that he ignores when shown…It is a cheap and dishonest argument method that is designed to get around answering the real evidence that Jason ignores once he thinks up the excuse to do so…If you read Kathy Etchingham’s book she only knew Jeffery through interactions of getting checks for her flat from him or other sundry interactions with him by being Jimi’s girlfriend…She didn’t really know Jeffery…Not nearly as well as Tappy who was hired by Jeffery and knew him directly from Newcastle where they both originated from…Kathy’s whole viewpoint on Jeffery is formed by the fact she won’t go past Monika or accuse the British government…Meanwhile we have plenty of proof in this thread that Jason is ignoring evidence when shown…People close to Jeffery suspected he had something to do with Jimi’s death…Jason: Why did Jeffery pretend to Bob Levine that he hadn’t heard Jimi was dead a week after his death?…Why did Michael lay low in Spain for the week after Jimi’s death?…Jason – If you publicly insult Albert Allen and the rest of the Hendrix community that know Albert is a dead serious, credible player who would never lie about something like that if it involved his friend Jimi, and ignore the evidence that Albert is telling the truth – like the Samarkand photos he described that had not been released publicly by Monika, then you are lowering yourself to the level of ignorable internet troll…Albert is telling the truth about what he witnessed and it predates Kathy’s investigation which happened on the other side of the Atlantic and can’t be used to deny Albert’s witnessing…Jason is all over the place and is sort of inferring that his crude canard of disproving Tappy’s exact words somehow debunks the rest of our evidence – including the slam-dunk forensic evidence that proves homicide…We’ve proven somebody murdered Jimi in the forensic and circumstantial evidence…And it wasn’t Monika…Jimi had just fired Jeffery 12 hours earlier and Jeffery would have done jail time or gotten killed once his books were examined…Anyone who calls Albert Allen a joker who is trying to cash in is a fool who has dismissed their own credibility in their desperate denial…
Do you always speak for Buster Flyswatter? I’m laughing at you since you think The Aleem Twins knowing Jimi longer than Kathy makes them more credible.
I don’t need Kathy to state “end all proof that Jeffery is innocent”. Tappy Wright already made that possible when he admitted he lied about Jeffery cuz he was in Spain.
I would gladly say that TaHarqa Aleem is a fraud and con artist right to his face. Same guy who made up a fake story for a book. Same guy who claimed Jimi gave him two prized guitars in 1969. Same guy who sued Janie Hendrix so he could steal Jimi’s guitars and auction them off to the highest bidders. Another fraud who wants to cash in on Hendrix’s name. Some good friend he is.
Buzzy Linhart is not a very reliable source. Claimed in a book that he spoke with Devon Wilson on the phone telling him Jimi took too many Tuinals out of the medicine cabinet and OD’d. He also published the b.s. “couch story” which is a joke. More phony claims from these people that can’t be sourced. Not real evidence when you are quoting dead people who cant confirm if it’s true..
Sorry, but you haven’t refuted anything I said. Bannister is the only person to claim he saw lungs with wine which no other person has .
You have a reading comprehension problem Flyswatter. Monika was the first person to mention wine. Bannister then talked about lungs with wine after reading Electric Gypsy since he needed a cover story cuz he was being sued for malpractice. Dr. Gavin Thurston never spoke of wine. It was Sharon Lawrence who gave that second hand quote in her book with that can’t be confirmed. She is already guilty of making up quotes in her book like the phony one of Jimi’s mother. Sharon is not credible. Brush up on your Jimi Hendrix research.
No Jason, I speak the truth. You only speak fabricated BS. Simple as that. And my reading skills are just fine. It’s yours that need serious work.
I can’t take your response as sincere Ivana and you are obviously only seeking denials…I am the interviewer in that video…The true context of that interview is European Hendrix archivist Caesar Gleebeek had written a book entitled ‘Until We Meet Again’ where he highlighted your quotes of Bob Levine…Caesar concluded his publication with the summation: “If you don’t believe me listen to Jimi’s manager Bob Levine”…Caesar then quoted Bob as saying it was all bullshit and Jimi wasn’t murdered…If you don’t find anything startling in Levine countering everything you and Caesar misrepresented by saying he suspected Jeffery in Jimi’s death then you are not really being honest and I have a problem with that…The true context of Bob Levine is I was the only person I know of to ever go to him and brief him on the evidence…Bob complimented me and said I was impressively knowledgeable…After finally having the evidence told to him he told me I should take my evidence to the FBI and then said “I guess Jimi really was murdered”…You show disqualifying disconcern to the point of uncredibility when you brush off Monika’s lying about the time of death…I’m sorry but to qualify for a credible opinion on this you have to live up to professional standards and those professional standards require that those admitted missing 5 hours then be calculated in to the witnessing and, more importantly, forensics…You seem to be ignorant of the fact that once you process those missing 5 hours and the true time of death in to the autopsy forensics it proves homicide on a forensic basis for reasons I’ve already explained in detail in this thread…What those missing 5 hours reflect is a 5:30am time of death and therefore 2 hour golden window for Jimi having the pills inside him…Caesar Glebbeek found the product manufacturer’s information for the Vesparax as well as the Underwriter’s Laboratory case histories for overdoses and found that people who took 10 to 15 tablets did not die in less than 4 hours…Since Monika’s exposed lie proves Jimi could only have had the pills in him for 2 hours max, and the 1850mg of barbiturate found in Jimi at autopsy proved he didn’t nearly have enough barbiturate in him to overdose, that proves homicide and proves he was drowned in wine because the forensics disprove any other cause…I’m afraid that’s proof you have failed to live up to in your entries and must be recognized and discussed in order to have a credible discussion…I know Kathy…What she says privately and publicly are two different things…As much good as she has done it is my opinion that she only goes as far as Monika for personal political reasons…She’s not helping Jimi by doing that…And you can’t use the main players being dead as an excuse because the things I cite are correct quotes from them and backed by the official record…
Ivana, Kathy was the only decent person in the bunch. Kathy did extensive investigative research trying to find out what really happened to Jimi. She rejects the false accusations of Michael Jeffery murdering Jimi. She wasn’t out to cash in on his name making up false lies. All these other people like Tappy Wright, Aleem Twins, Sharon Lawrence etc. used Jimi to cash in on money based on lies. They are all fraudsters and con artists. Kathy’s quote refutes Buster’s falsehood of her hardly knowing Jeffery. Kathy’s quote proves Buster wrong claiming Kathy just got checks from Jeffery in a passing moment. Michael Jeffery, Jimi, and Kathy were a tight knit group.
“I think Mike Jeffery has had a bad press, quite frankly. We used to go up to Mike Jeffery’s flat in Jermyn Street, me and Jimi. He had a wife called Jill. He used to have us in stitches. We were practically falling on the floor with laughter. He was so funny. Never, ever did he talk about, ‘You’ve got to do this, or you’ve got to do that’. He just used to tell amusing tales and everything. Yes, he did rip them off, but then lots of people ripped off bands in those days.” – Kathy Etchingham
Kathy’s quote doesn’t mean squat, except the part about Jeffery ripping Jimi off & Jimi came to realize just how extensive that was after he had parted ways with Kathy, plus Kathy was nowhere in the vicinity when things really started to heat up between Jeffery and Jimi in mid-1969. Juma Sultan was there & he talked quite extensively about how Jimi had expressed to him directly that he was dissatisfied with Jeffery’s management.
You’re just regurgitating pure nonsense when you accuse the Aleem Twins and Sharon Lawrence using Jimi to cash in on lies & calling them fraudsters. Anyone can easily see that you are doing that because you can’t directly answer or refute their testimonies that shoot down your false narratives. And you can’t prove Tappy’s claim to be false, either.
The real fraudster here is somebody like you trying to sell himself as being knowledgeable and credible to the subject. You clearly aren’t.
The tin foil hatters like Buster and Flyswatter only can say you are “not credible” when you prove them wrong. Weak and pathetic. Kathy’s quote proves Buster wrong. Buster made a false claim that Kathy hardly knew Jeffery. She knew him well. Buster is wrong. Kathy’s quote means a lot. She knew Jeffery well enough to know he isn’t capable of murder. Kathy refutes Jeffery murdering Hendrix. Jeffery was in Spain so he couldn’t have killed Hendrix.
Tappy Wright already proved his own claim to be false when he admitted he made the whole thing up to sell his useless book. Bob Levine also proved Tappy Wright to be a con artist. Jeffery was in Spain so Tappy Wright lied to sell a book. Aleem Twins and Sharon Lawrence made money off Jimi Hendrix under false conditions with phony claims. That is a fact. You are selling a lie using lies to support your fake murder claim.
LOL — gotta love these lying-denying pig-breeders like Jason that wallow in their pig doo-doo mire of denial of reality. The tin foil hat that Jason speaks of belongs only on Jason’s head because all he has done is urinate on his own head & tell himself that it is raining, as evidenced by his statement of “Aleem Twins and Sharon Lawrence made money off Jimi Hendrix under false conditions with phony claims”. All that is one of Jason’s patented one-dismissals with nothing to substantiate it.
Jason has not provided any substance to refute the medical evidence that Jimi was a homicide victim that has already been posted in abundance. Jason has not proven one single thing that I’ve posted to be wrong, but tries to make the false claim that he’s proven me false. No Jason, you haven’t refuted one single thing that I’ve posted — not once. Just stupid one-line dismissals that don’t prove anything is all you’ve came up with.
Jason probably doesn’t realize his transparent denial works more in our favor than anything…It is kind of obvious that Jason is a troll who is trying to force Kathy Etchingham’s woman-like evasions to be the one and only final decider…But he can’t get away with that because there’s just too much other incriminating evidence against Jeffery that Jason himself is obviously trying to avoid…There’s nothing in that quote of Kathy that serves as proof Jeffery was innocent…A more responsible analyst would realize Kathy is speaking of a time early on in his career when Jimi was cooperating with Jeffery and trying to make it in England…It is also ridiculous to suggest Jeffery was going to discuss ugly business matters with Jimi at those private parties…It is painfully obvious to me that both Kathy and Jason are aware of the mortal implications of Jeffery’s later interactions with Jimi and, typical of Kathy, that is why they refer to this irrelevant reference in order to convince themselves of something they both know is untrue…It is so obvious that it actually works for us instead of against us, as Jason falsely suggests…
Jason’s attempt to canonize Kathy and make her word holy while vilifying every other witness and making them dirty opportunists isn’t working and grinds against the real facts any good research would uncover…Truth is Tappy had a close relationship to Jeffery and access to the things he wrote about that Kathy did not…Whether Jason ignores or denies that makes no difference…Jason is lying when he says Sharon Lawrence and Albert Allen “cashed-in” on falsehoods…Anyone who knows Sharon Lawrence knows she is just the opposite of that description…Sharon is infamous amongst Hendrix researchers for hostile avoidance of any involvement in the issue…As far as I know she didn’t make any money off her book and if you read the book itself she said she was reluctantly talked in to publishing it…As far as Albert Allen the same thing goes…Only a person who has no credible knowledge or understanding of the Hendrix world would dare accuse Albert Allen of lying about his witnessing at Electric Lady to make money…If you know anything about the Twins, Jimi was like religion to them and they would never lie about such a thing…Jason ignores this and repeats the claim harder…The reason Jason does that is because he is a troll who can’t back off one bit from his cheap denial or otherwise it will quickly become apparent that he is full of it and can’t allow any real truth to enter his ridiculous defense of Michael Jeffery…Those who have researched this deeply know that Kathy is avoiding any accusations past Monika and that is how she is…They also know that Sharon Lawrence had no interest in cashing-in and was just the opposite in her irrational avoidance of the subject…Sharon witnessed something very important…She witnessed Monika moaning in to the telephone for 20 seconds when asked about the wine…She then witnessed Monika making up a quick excuse for that wine by saying she washed vomit off Jimi’s face with wine…But we know that was a lie because the ambulance men said no vomit was washed off Jimi’s face…Monika moaned because she knew the wine was used to murder Jimi…Then in a very few short seconds Albert Allen accidentally stumbled in to witnessing the true context of what happened at the Samarkand…
Anyone reading this please notice that I have informed Jason of a video interview I did with Bob Levine where he said he suspected Jeffery in Jimi’s death…I have also more than adequately referenced the book ‘Setting The Record Straight’, which contained Bob’s first original words on the subject…In that book Bob made it more than clear that Jeffery was suspicious in Jimi’s death…There are also other witnesses to Albert Allen’s witnessing who seriously corroborated its realness…Additionally, I have had private phone conversations with Kathy where I discussed the evidence that pointed to Jeffery and she indirectly agreed but then said she didn’t want to get involved…
After doing woefully dishonest defamation against the real witnesses, and using an obvious out of context evasive quote from Kathy, Jason then goes on to use this cheap denial to claim the murder evidence is invalid…However he never once attempts to touch my more than clearly spelled-out forensic evidence in this thread…You can’t have 5 bottles of wine inside you while only having a 5mg blood alcohol content…It is medically impossible and you won’t be able to find any other real accidental overdose choking on vomit victims that had those forensic particulars…Jason tried his defamation on Dr Bannister saying he is a liar, however when we proved Dr Siefert was caught saying Jimi was covered in wine and then saying he detected no alcohol on Jimi Jason ignored it…Jason also ignored Dr Thurston saying Jimi’s stomach was full of red wine and tried to get out of it by saying Sharon Lawrence was trying to cash-in…No Jason – you can’t get away with that…You’re obviously a contemptuous denier who is trying to use cheap name-calling to get around the facts that you never quite get around to credibly answering…
Buster writes a looooong essay heavy on defensiveness, lies, and denial with no evidence and only innuendo.
Buster has been proven to be a lair claiming Kathy hardly knew Jeffery. Kathy’s own quote shows Buster to be a liar. Kathy knew Jeffery well. Buster attacks Kathy’s credibility because she shows that Jeffery was close with her and Jimi. Kathy believes Jeffery didn’t kill Hendrix as tin foil hatters like Buster claims. Buster has no answer for this and can only make up innuendos out of thin air against Jeffery. Buster is not very credible.
Buster is ignorant enough to think Sharon Lawrence would write a book and not accept money for writing it. Who would do that? Lawrence’s book is riddled with false claims and dramatic events to appeal to the reader. She claimed Jimi was born at a family friend’s house instead of King County Hospital where he was born. Lawrence made up some fake quote in her book claiming Jimi’s mother said to him before she passed away. Same woman who lied under oath in Toronto perjuring herself. Same woman who auctioned off empty cigarette packs claiming it was Jimi’s to cash in on his name. Buster is the liar here and ignorant of what this woman has done. Who would believe anything this woman claims in her book when she is a liar and cashed in on Hendrix. That’s right, Buster would.
Bob Levine never confirmed Jeffery murdered Hendrix anywhere. Bob Levine said in several interviews the murder claim was bullshit. Same phony claim of flooding lungs with wine by Buster that nobody can account for except for Bannister’s word. His word is no good cuz he is a convicted fraud. Thurston never said anything about Jimi’s stomach full of red wine. He didn’t even state that in his final report.
Buster’s lies and claims of false innuendos falls flat on his face cuz he has no evidence of wine or a murder. Buster only has false claims of what his fraud sources tells him from made up quotes and innuendos. Where is all this damning evidence Buster? Where is this evidence of a murder and lungs with wine besides your made up one sourced quotes that there is no evidence of?
Part of the reason Flyswatter and myself are active on the internet posting the correct evidence is because of a small core of dedicated deniers like Jason who showed a rabid commitment to opposing the true facts on Jimi’s death…I guess I should thank Jason because the out-dated simple denials he posts are part of what led us to develop the evidence to the degree we have…A smart person will see that Jason’s phony act depends on calling just about all the witnesses to the murder evidence opportunists or liars and also defending Michael Jeffery – a notorious crook and dangerous manager…Jason is no friend of Jimi Hendrix…He’s a friend of his murderers…I have found in my years of arguing on the internet that if you argue well you can get trolls to out themselves…Good argument and truth is like cryptonite to trolls and if you do it well those trolls inevitably can’t resist going in to their troll dance like Jason does here right on cue…
The simple answer to Jason’s crude denial is to get Kathy Etchingham to discuss the evidence for Jeffery’s guilt…She won’t do it because she knows there’s more to it than the out of context quote Jason disingenuously tries to force against everything else…I know this is true because of the personal phone calls I have had with Kathy that Jason is ignoring…She is quite aware that there’s more to it than what Jason quotes…She just doesn’t want to get involved…Jason is just a cheap denier…Anyone who really knows the Hendrix community and the players in this knows what I describe about Kathy is the correct version…The reason Jason is so desperate to force an irrelevant quote from 1967 is because he’s trying to avoid discussing the facts from 1969 and 1970…Jason is using this wholly disingenuous troll screed to avoid mentioning that anyone with a speck of credibility realizes Kathy is majorly responsible for uncovering the evidence Jimi was murdered, as her investigation and book detailed…This con man Jason is trying to convince the public that we’re all nuts and Kathy is a source for the murder theory being bogus…However behind his classic always being on the offensive trolling Jason hopes the public doesn’t notice he omits Kathy’s exposing of the murder evidence for which she is well known…
Another thing that exposes these trolls is the fact they play dumb and pretend not to know any of the murder evidence…However anyone can see that Jason is extensively versed and referenced and comes up with finely detailed information when trying to justify his one-sided denial…Jason is obviously drawing deeply from the murder denial website Crosstown Torrents that is run by British murder denier Gordon Johnson…As to Sharon Lawrence, Jason once again turns up the cheap defamation with tit for tat complaints against her in order to undermine her credibility…However, to anyone who has deeply-researched knowledge of the subject, it is quite obvious that Jason is turning up the cheap stuff against Lawrence exactly because he’s aware she had damning witnessing…If any cares to notice I pointed out in my last post that Sharon had a serious witnessing of Monika lying about pouring wine on Jimi…Monika did that in order to make a quick excuse about wine she knew was used to murder Jimi…In fact Monika’s death within a year of that event was directly tied to it…Jason is avoiding the basic fact that people don’t moan or make up transparent lies in reaction to wine that doesn’t exist…Lawrence did not cash-in on Hendrix…Jason is lying and when shown otherwise just repeats the lie harder like the troll he is…The bottom line is Sharon Lawrence was a reporter who knew Hendrix and experienced very important witnessing with Monika and the wine…Jason, on the other hand, is just an annoying internet troll… Yet despite his obvious denial Jason comes on here and tries to place himself and his obvious denial trolling before Sharon…The bottom line to anyone with any sense is the harder Jason goes after a witness with cheap defamation the more credible the evidence he’s trying to hide…
I video interviewed Bob Levine 5 months before he died…I did it mostly because of liars like Jason who were misleading the public on what Bob really thought and had created a false understanding in that public …I was close to Bob and Tappy in the last years of their lives and knew them personally…That interview is on You-Tube and can be searched under “Bob Levine Caesar Glebbeek”…In it Bob makes clear that he has been misquoted by persons like Jason and that he suspected Jeffery in Jimi’s death…Levine’s first and last quotes are what are credible…Jason dishonestly ignores Bob’s first comments in the book ‘Setting The Record Straight’ where he warned Jimi not to sign a personal insurance policy with Jeffery and said Jeffery pretended he didn’t know about Jimi’s death a week after it happened…I asked Jason to please answer why Jeffery would pretend he didn’t know about Jimi’s death a week after it happened?…Jason ignored it…Hit piece writers like Joe Bosso and Bob Merlis were simply seeking the denials…Not wanting to get involved Bob gave it to them…Bosso and Merlis never covered any of the evidence for murder, which, as this thread shows, is more than abundant…After I spoke to Bob about the evidence he hadn’t ever been informed of he told me “I guess Jimi really was murdered”…
Jason is lying when he says Gavin Thurston never mentioned the red wine in Jimi’s stomach…It is right there in Sharon Lawrence’s book where her fellow reporter Jack Meehan got it from Thurston during a September 29th 1970 interview…It’s the tie-breaker and decider as far as the evidence for the wine and vindicates Dr Bannister…Jason also ignores the fact we have caught Dr Siefert lying…In a video interview from the 1990’s Siefert said Jimi was covered in wine…After Tappy’s book came out Glebbeek got a quote from Siefert saying “I detected no alcohol on Jimi”…Siefert was obviously covering-up – which is more damning proof of the wine…The scum on Crosstown Torrents never admitted this overturned their denial position that Jason repeats here…They never apologized and never honestly admitted what it therefore showed…Jason is so full of dishonest denial that he can’t fathom that Thurston’s not mentioning the stomach full of red wine in the report is evidence of a cover-up…
Seeing all this Jason then desperately resorts to the same old “you have no evidence” claim in front of a full case of evidence the public can see Jason’s weak denials have failed to answer for…It’s pretty pathetic and anyone can see Jason is a pathetic gadfly whose cheap denial is crushed and imprinted in the treads of the juggernaut of evidence we have shown…”Innuendo”???…Everything I have written here is based on solid fact that I have backed-up…Jason is so full of it that he actually thinks his cheap denials aren’t painfully visible for what they are and that he’s actually getting away with it…
The autopsy and its forensics are not a “fraud source” as Jason lies…Jason is doing his best to use cheap trash talk to avoid intelligent discussion of the evidence for homicide that is locked-in to those forensics…
Buster writes an even loooooonger essay doubling down on defensiveness,lies, denial with character attacks.
Buster is in free fall. Buster chooses to impugn my character instead of supporting his phony claims with real evidence. Buster only uses debunked one sourced quotes as evidence and tries to defend it when it’s proven false. That’s all tin foil hatters can do.
Buster feels that calling me a “troll” will somehow make up for the fact he has no real evidence for his claims. Spent the last couple of weeks calling me not credible and not knowing anything. Now calls me well versed in Hendrix research. Which is it?
I’m gonna have to refute this junk he wrote so here it goes.
Buster and Flyswatter don’t post the correct evidence. They dabble in peddling fake conspiracy theories that they fabricate. All of what they post which is one sourced quotes and stories from fraud sources that can easily be fact checked and refuted with research.
Buster continues to attack Kathy’s credibility cuz she refutes their phony conspiracy. Buster attacks me and calls me a “friend of murderers” when Hendrix wasn’t even murdered. Just more stupid character attacks cuz that’s all he has.
What can I say Buster, you use people who are liars and frauds for your sources. Why are you defending them? Why do you defend garbage claims for your so called facts?
Sharon Lawrence made up fake quotes in her book. She lied under oath in a court of law on foreign soil committing perjury, she auctioned off empty cigarette packs claiming it was Jimi’s from the 60’s/70’s. She is a liar and a fraud cashing in on his name. But you lie Buster and claim it isn’t so. Very pathetic, man. How can you believe a fraud who’s lied many times and use as a credible source? You are not the “greatest foremost authority” repeating lies from known frauds. This is fraudulent research based on lies.
No Buster, you are lying. Dr. Gavin Thurston never said anything about “Hendrix being imbibed with large amounts of wine”. Sharon Lawrence printed a second hand quote where she claims Thurston said that to another reporter. Another made up fake quote from her and you use it as your phony claim as “real evidence”. if Hendrix was “imbibed with wine” Thurston would have made an announcement to every reporter who asked the cause of death and included it in his final report. Another b.s. one sourced quote with no evidence.
Bob Levine never confirmed Jimi was murdered in any video. More lies fabrication coming from Buster.
Siefert said that there was a “bit of mess” on Hendrix and never said he was covered in wine.
Buster is ignorant of the word forensic. Forensics are samples taken from a death scene that determines evidence based on investigation and science. Bannister’s claim of lungs with wine is not forensics.
The rest of what Buster wrote is paranoid defensive free fall. I ask Buster to prove all this evidence of a murder without his one sourced quotes. Can you do that Buster? Where is all this wine that Banister saw? What did he do with it?
Buster’s 3 fraud sources for his phony murder claim
Tappy Wright – deceased former Animals roadie who wrote a fraud book. Claimed Michael Jeffery admitted he murdered Hendrix with pills and wine. Wright later admitted he lied about this to sell a book. Jeffery was in Spain confirmed by two sources.
Doctor Bannnister – fraud doctor who lost his medical license due to malpractice. Made up the phony claim he saw Hendrix’s lungs filled with wine so he couldn’t be sued again for malpractice.
Sharon Lawrence – former UPI reporter who lied under oath perjuring herself in a court of law. Auctioned off old empty cigarette packs she claimed was Hendrix’s so she could cash in on his name. Wrote a book filled with made up quotes and stories including Dr. Thurston telling another reporter that “Hendrix was imbibed with wine”.
Hey Jason — hear this sound? PSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
That’s the sound of you pissing on your own head and telling yourself it is raining (must be a form of cheap thrills, huh), because that is all your doing, as evidenced by this statement:
“Buster and Flyswatter don’t post the correct evidence. They dabble in peddling fake conspiracy theories that they fabricate. All of what they post which is one sourced quotes and stories from fraud sources that can easily be fact checked and refuted with research. ”
That is a blatant lie. The only person fabricating the lies is you. I posted a photo that showed what Jack Meehan told Sharon Lawrence about his interview with Thurston & all you’ve been able to come up with is a stupid one-line dismissal of “Dr. Gavin Thurston never said anything about “Hendrix being imbibed with large amounts of wine””, which is pure BS, because you can’t make up what Sharon published in her book. If Thurston hadn’t told that to Meehan, then he would have never relayed that info to Sharon & she would have never published it. Simple as that. It was the very reason that Sharon asked Monika directly in a phone conversation (shortly before Monika) if Monika had poured wine on Jimi.
You say that what we post are “one-sourced quotes and stories from fraud sources that can easily be fact checked and refuted with research”, and yet, you haven’t provided one such reference source to those so-called “fact checks” (Kathy’s quote doesn’t refute anything and it certainly doesn’t refute Albert Allen’s witnessing, which I’ve shown that witnessing by Albert Allen was also referenced by Buzzy Linhart and Roger Pomphrey — which lays to waste your ‘one-source quote’ BS).
I suppose that according to you, Juma Sultan is also lying about what he said about Jimi telling him that he was dissatisfied with the management that I made reference to earlier (which I noticed you never answered ) because it doesn’t fit your phony narrative. The Aleem Twins speak of the same thing in their book “Ghetto Fighters in Harlem World”.
All you’ve done is just piss on your own head & tell yourself it’s raining and talk out your anal sphincter. Even one source is better than the NO sources that you’ve provided.
We have the 3rd doctor named Bob Brown who also made a public statement that Jimi appeared to have “too much to drink” upon his arrival to the hospital which can seen in both of these articles:
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/music/about-that-jimi-hendrix-death-business/news-story/ce5ff67c5e0c9a0857b51eb33d88357b
https://www.couriermail.com.au/entertainment/music/about-that-jimi-hendrix-death-business/news-story/ce5ff67c5e0c9a0857b51eb33d88357b?sv=55d2698fd5dee338cff30dfcede38062
^^Is that also a one source quote, Jason?. Looks like two sources to anyone else. What would make Bob Brown think Jimi had too much to drink, if there was no wine, as you are trying to depict?
I suppose that next Jason will be telling us that the ambulance men didn’t find just Jimi’s dead body at Monika’s flat & that Monika was nowhere to be seen, even though that was entered into a sworn deposition, but according Jason, it’s just a one-source quote. Tell us Jason, does the pic below look like a one-source quote? Looks like a photocopy of the document proving that sworn deposition by those ambulance men, to anyone else.
All one has to do to realize Jason is a troll is to read Flyswatter’s and my own posts and then read Jason’s responses…Jason is lying below and he has not debunked any of our claims…Anyone can read this debate and see we offer substance and direct examples of evidence and references…Jason offers cheap trash-talk and crude denial in response…His form alone gives him away…As does the fact he offers esoteric detail from deeply sourced Hendrix material when seeking his falsely spun denials, yet when it comes to accounting for his false claims he suddenly becomes stupid and responds with cheap talk…The sure sign of a disingenuous troll…But the best way to expose these deniers is they always pose themselves as rejecters of bad claims and evidence…Well the worst evidence out there is Monika Dannemann’s official story that was used to determine the cause of death…Jason is hoping you won’t notice that he is ignoring that Kathy proved Monika’s story was nothing but lies…Jason poses himself as a harsh critic of bad evidence but he never touches Monika’s full offering of lies…
I know Kathy and have discussed the evidence with her directly…When I told her the evidence for Jeffery’s guilt she said “Well, now you know”…Jason conspicuously avoids answering that the best way to approach this is to get Kathy to come out and talk about it and discuss it in a normal court room adversarial setting like is normally done…Once done you would see that she knows a lot more than she is saying and that Jason’s quote is wholly disingenuous and out of context…Jason also outs himself as a disingenuous troll by ignoring the fact Kathy was a main source for the murder evidence…Jason is hoping we don’t notice that he omitted that in his response and when I mentioned it he ignored it…Jason doesn’t like me saying he is uncredible, but when you ignore things like Kathy being a main source for the murder evidence you become uncredible out here where the substance lay…
Jason’s coverage of Sharon Lawrence is visibly idiotic…As with Kathy the best solution would be to get Sharon to come discuss Jack Meehan’s witnessing and corroborate it…I’m sure if we could do that we would quickly see Sharon could cite references, articles, and confirming details that would leave no doubt Meehan witnessed Dr Thurston saying Jimi had a stomach full of red wine…It is also common sense that Monika would not moan for 20 seconds in reaction to innocuous wine that was only used to wash vomit…Common sense tells us no one would use wine to wash vomit when warm water and a hand towel were just as close by…I’m sure if we could somehow get Jason to confront Sharon in person and accuse her of lying she would rip him a new one and we would quickly see who was telling the truth…Sharon is telling the truth about her quoting of Meehan and she is also telling the truth about her discussion of the wine with Monika…It is the cheap rate internet troll Jason who is lying here…Somewhere out there is a record of Meehan’s interview with Thurston that will prove all this and show Jason to by the lying jackass he is…
What Jason fails to honestly reflect is Dr Thurston’s witnessing of the wine is reinforced by the fact Dr Siefert was caught lying…In the 1990’s video documentary maker David Kramer captured Siefert saying Jimi was covered in wine on tape…After Tappy’s book came out Glebbeek quoted Siefert saying “I detected no alcohol on Jimi”…Siefert was obviously lying to cover-up something he knew was dangerous…Also, Dr Bob Brown was quoted as saying he walked in next to the gurney when Jimi was wheeled in to hospital…Brown said there was obviously some kind of misadventure involving wine and that Jimi was obviously beyond medical remedy…Jason is pretending his itemized denial is working but anyone can see these other witnessing corroborate Lawrence and Meehan…Jason never answered why Scotland Yard failed to go find the nurses that witnessed the wine when they pretended to answer Kathy’s petition…A denial troll must always keep the arguments within the dishonest confines of his disingenuous narrative…
To show how flagrantly dishonest Jason is, instead of honestly admitting my interview with Bob Levine showed that everything he said about Bob was wrong and that Bob actually did suspect Jeffery in Jimi’s death, Jason created a strawman saying “Levine never confirmed Jim was murdered”…This is just straight dishonest use of sleazy semantics to get around the fact Bob sided with me and agreed Jeffery was suspicious in Jimi’s death…There’s no doubt from my interview with Bob that Jason got caught lying and trying to misrepresent what Bob really believed…And he won’t own up to it when caught like the true denial troll he is…And we are still waiting for Jason to answer why Jeffery pretended not to know Jimi was dead a week after he died…Or why Bosso or Merlis never asked Bob about that?…(That’s still unanswered by yourself Jason)…
Jason shows fatuous ignorance in his saying that I don’t understand forensics…Only a fool would say wine in the lungs is not forensic evidence like Jason does…He dismisses himself from credibility on that one count alone…I spoke to Harvard’s top pathologist and he told me I had a remarkable ability to converse on a medical basis for a lay person…I also spoke to several of the world’s top forensic pathologists…What Jason is really saying here is he doesn’t understand my forensic evidence…It proves Jimi did not have enough alcohol, barbiturate, or time to die the way that was claimed…If Jason would actually discuss that instead of dodging it like he did he would see that I am correct…
Jimi was an epic victim of some of the world’s worst evil corruption…Lying and distorting evidence like Jason does, in order to defend the murderers and deny Jimi justice, is probably one of the lowest things you can do…In a perverse way Jason probably doesn’t realize he is only proving the extraordinary evil measures that were used against Jimi in the first place…Jason’s contrived slander and negative spin against Tappy, Sharon, and Dr Bannister is the desperate attempt to misrepresent that it looks like in order to deny the obvious…His libelous dishonesty against those 3 is easily refuted by a more honest and lengthily detailed account of their true involvement that Jason is obviously trying to short-cut with his vicious spin…There’s a hot place in hell waiting for Jason…
And let us not forget the 4th person that Jason has slandered in TaHarqa Aleem & how Jason talks a real tough guy talk of how he’d “gladly say that TaHarqa Aleem is a fraud and con artist right to his face. Same guy who made up a fake story for a book”
Yeah right — and result would most likely be two hits. TaHarqa hitting Jason & Jason hitting the floor
Flyswatter, you should change your name to Fabricator cuz that’s all you do. You and Buster lie. You both peddle phony conspiracy theories and get angry when the facts prove you wrong.
You are lying. You’ve posted no photo of the phony Sharon Lawrence “Jack Meehan claim”. You posted a letter from the ambulance service that stated Hendrix was alone in the flat when the ambulance men arrived. Why are you lying?
Sharon Lawrence made up several fake quotes and stories in her book. That is a fact. She couldn’t even correctly state where Hendrix was born. The wine myth was already circulating when she wrote her book. Sharon Lawrence made up that quote about Meehan in the book for dramatic effects for the reader. Thurston made no reference to “imbibed wine” in his final autopsy report. He certainly wouldn’t say “imbibed wine” to a lone reporter and then “forget” to add it in a crucial autopsy report. Sharon’s quote was made up.
Yes, you use once sourced quotes using fraud sources. I’ve already fact checked your phony Tappy Wright claim. Tappy Wright claimed that Jeffery murdered Hendrix with wine and pills. That is a false lie. Jeffery was in Spain confirmed by Trixie Sullivan and Bob Levine. You were fact checked by me and proven to be a liar. Anybody who reads your garbage can fact check what you write and refute your phony claims.
Jimi being dissatisfied with his management has nothing to do with what you are trying to claim. Bob Brown is another one sourced quote. Bob Brown never worked on Hendrix. Bob Brown made his quote after Bannister claimed his imaginary wine. Neither Bannister or Brown stated anything about wine in 1970. They both said nothing about wine in their statement they released to the press in 1970 as a cause of death. There was never any physical evidence of wine inside Hendrix. No wine was preserved for evidence and no wine was ever documented in any medical, death or autopsy report in September 1970. All we have are phony claims from decades later with no physical proof that you’re trying to sell.
Your reading comprehension is terrible. Take a reading comprehension course and brush up on your Hendrix history.
Buster writes another looooong useless essay only attacking my character, lying, and defensively repeating his same phony debunked theory. Hilarious.
Buster is in rapid free fall. He should use a pair of feathers and flap his arms to prepare for a soft landing.
I’ve asked Buster to provide some real evidence for his phony murder theory and the response he gave me was “go to hell”.
That should tell us all we need to know about Buster “the self proclaimed foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix”. Buster has no evidence to provide and that’s why he’s angrily lashing out in his comments. If he had evidence he would post it instead of rambling on about nothing important.
Buster has no evidence to support his phony murder theory. That’s why he spent his whole useless post attacking my character calling me a “troll”. He weakly and defensively repeated the same garbage that’s already been debunked with his flowery prose. Buster can only use fake quotes from fraud sources cuz he has nothing else to offer. That’s why his Hendrix murder theory is a total joke.
I’m gonna have to refute all this junk he wrote again. Read on.
Buster rants about Monika Dannemann when I’ve never mentioned the woman. He also tries to pass off “private conversations” he claims to have had as his “big evidence” to prove his theory. Another joke that should give everyone reading a big laugh.
Buster has been busted using fake quotes and fraud sources for his “evidence”. Sharon Lawrence peppered her book with fake quotes and Buster uses the phony Meehan quote as his source.
According to Sharon Lawrence, Dr. Thurston (a famous coroner who routinely spoke with reporters) only confirmed “imbibed wine” to Jack Meehan and no other person on Earth. Anyone with a half a brain wouldn’t believe that crap. That is a total joke. Thurston never confirmed anything about “imbibed wine” in his final autopsy report. There was no “imbibed wine”. Lawrence made the whole thing up for her fantasy book.
Buster claims Sharon Lawrence would “rip me a new one” if I confronted her on her book claims. That’s kind of hard for her to do when she claimed Jimi was born at a family friend’s house instead of King County Hospital where he was actually born. Buster is providing pure comedy in his post for everyone to read.
Buster is delusional believing he sees things in a video that doesn’t exist. Only the things he wants to see. That is delusion. Bob Levine never said anything in that video about Jimi Hendrix being murdered. Anybody watching will tell you that.
Buster shamefully hounded this sick man living out his last remaining days in his nursing home. Buster was trying his hardest to lead Bob with questions and answers looking for the confirmation he never got. Levine never confirmed Jeffery murdered Hendrix. That’s hilarious. Bob knew it didn’t happen. That’s why Bob never confirmed it in Buster’s pointless video.
What we did see was an ill looking Levine becoming visibly upset at Buster’s persistent questioning. Levine looked like he was about to cry and said “he didn’t want to discuss it” and it was “old stuff”. A horrible thing to do to a very sick man.
When Levine was in better health and in sound mind he vehemently denied Hendrix being murdered on record in the press. Bob also proclaimed Jeffery being innocent. Levine told that to various media outlets. I’ll take the healthy Bob at his word which is documented as evidence stating Jimi was never murdered. Buster’s video was an epic fail.
Buster the “self proclaimed foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix” doesn’t even know his Hendrix history if he thinks Jeffery “pretended not to know Jimi was dead for a week”. If Buster was credible he would know that there was a huge storm that went through Majorca Spain on the early morning of September 18, 1970 that knocked out the power and phone lines. No power to watch t.v. or to accept phone calls. This has already been documented. Buster should take a Hendrix 101 History class.
Buster has no understanding of the word forensic. Buster thinks a phony claim of “wine in the lungs” from Dr. Bannister as he matches up the blood alcohol numbers on Thurston’s autopsy report accounts for his forensics. Everybody should be rolling on the floor with laughter. And his claim of undisclosed “world’s top pathologists” calling his understanding of forensics “remarkable” makes it even more hilarious.
Forensics is the actual physical evidence and there is none. There never was any wine accounted for in the lungs of Jimi Hendrix. It wasn’t seen in the performed autopsy or listed in the final autopsy report. Bannister never reported any wine in Hendrix on September 18, 1970. Dr. Siefert said there was “a good bit of mess” not “he was covered in wine”. That’s why this whole thing is joke.
Buster has no clue of what the word slander means. He thinks when his fraud sources are exposed for their lies that is slander. Nope. That is called telling the truth.
Tappy Wright claimed Jeffery killed Hendrix with wine and pills. That is false. Jeffery was in Spain. Wright admitted he lied to sell copies of his book. No slander since that is the truth.
Doctor Bannister lost his medical license for fraud and was sued for medical malpractice. He made a phony wine claim in 1992 when he thought he was going to be sued again for malpractice. He said nothing about wine in 1970 when he prepared the official written hospital statement on Hendrix’s death. No slander that is the truth.
Sharon Lawrence committed felony perjury in a court of law in Toronto in 1969. She auctioned off empty cigarette packs claiming they belonged to Hendrix in the 60’s to make money off his name. She made up fake quotes in her book and lied where Hendrix was born. No slander this is the truth.
TaHarqa Aleem made up a phony story for his book. He claimed that Jimi Hendrix gave him 2 prized guitars in 1969. He sued Janie Hendrix so he could steal Jimi’s guitars and auction them off to the highest bidders. No slander here either.
Buster calls it slander cuz he is angry that his 4 fraud sources has been exposed as liars and he can’t use their fake quotes as phony evidence. All of that is the truth. This is why we can’t believe these 4 frauds since it’s their fraudulent claims for a Hendrix murder with no evidence.
I thought Buster would have more than this. He humiliated himself with his pathetic post.
I appreciate any efforts made to establish the truth of what happened the morning Jimi died. There have been countless books and documentaries about Jimi’s life and death. A very thorough and well written book was written by Chris Welsh in the early seventies. Also the Warner Bros documentary featured many interviews with the people who new Jimi intimately. The Aleem twins were featured in this. They had every opportunity to discuss Jimi’s death in that interview back then, but they decided to wait 50 years later to write about the conversation between Monika Danneman and Michael Jeffrey. Buster you say that Bob Levine encouraged you to speak to the FBI about the information you have about Jimi’s death. Did you? Also did you contact Kathy Etchingham when her investigation was going on with your information? People like Tappy Wright who disclose “bombshell” information many many years later are the ones who are not helping Jimi.
Please don’t patronize me Ivana…I have Welch’s book…It is the first Hendrix book I ever bought…Typical of British authors it is worthless on Jimi’s murder and avoids any useful analysis…Because of that Welch was chosen to speak of Jimi’s death at the end of the 2013 documentary ‘Hear My Train A Comin’…Welch said Jimi died of a barbiturate overdose and ignored all the evidence Kathy Etchingham revealed…Yet you describe it as “very thorough”…
You once again show the ignorance I accused you of when you suggest that the 1973 “Soundtrack” movie would have delved in to the circumstances of Jimi’s death…Warner Brothers was mob-connected and was the institution Michael Jeffery had a contract for Jimi’s music with…It is quite ignorant to the point of foolish to not realize Warner wasn’t going to spoil future profits by uncovering a murder that would have resulted in that relationship ending abruptly…I had a personal conversation with Albert Allen and asked him why he didn’t say anything back then…I hope to release it in a future book…By the way, they didn’t wait 50 years and I have interviewed musicians who witnessed Albert speaking of it in the 70’s…Michael Jeffery was alive and was involved in contracting that movie when it was made…
If you ask me to take my evidence to the FBI you are only exposing your ignorance once again…FBI and COINTELPRO were accomplices if not the direct sponsors of Jimi’s murder…You ask a lot of questions, but you don’t ask why CIA, FBI, or even Scotland Yard didn’t look in to the murder of a US citizen overseas…
I really wish I had contacted Kathy Etchingham back when she made her petition…I believe I could have added serious clout to her attempt…My Hendrix collector peer group were not intellectual types and I did not know of or subscribe to the Hendrix magazines of the day…In any case what I am typing here makes no difference whether it was entered back then or now…
Ivana, you practice the permanent aggressive posturing of a person seeking to deny…What you have done here is paved a road of your own gratuitous doubt and then driven down it by answering your own questions but never answering mine…If you look at my last post I showed you court room level evidence that proves Jimi was murdered…You made no attempt to answer it…Instead you made very weak, specious points that were easily responded to and did not constitute any overturning or refutation of what I wrote…You can’t just ignore that Kathy proved Monika had lied about the time of death by as much as 6 hours…Dr Rufus Crompton said Jimi died no later than 5:30am because of the undigested rice in his stomach…This was also the time Eric Burdon admitted Monika first called…If you read what I wrote you can’t die from 9 Vesparax if you have a famous tolerance like Jimi…And you especially can’t die if you only had the pills inside you for only 1 or 2 hours…Gleebeek found that persons who took 10 to 15 pills never died in less than 4 hours…And none of those victims were found with 5 bottles of wine flooding their lungs and stomach with only a trace blood alcohol content…
Jimi fired Jeffery at 5pm on the 17th and was found dead 12 hours later under dubious circumstances with everyone lying…Jeffery would have done jail time once his books were inspected because of the millions he stole…
Please answer these provable facts Ivana…So far you haven’t…
Conspiracy theories Buster. Jimi never fired Jeffery. His contract did not allow it. Another one of your phony stories.
BUSTER says: Warner Brothers was mob-connected and was the institution Michael Jeffery had a contract for Jimi’s music with…It is quite ignorant to the point of foolish to not realize Warner wasn’t going to spoil future profits by uncovering a murder that would have resulted in that relationship ending abruptly…
JASON says: This is why your “Jimi Hendrix Murder hoax” is a fraud just like you are.
Jimi’s contract with Reprise/Warner Brothers ran for another 2 1/2 years and the ironclad contract Jimi signed with Jeffery prevented Jimi from just outright firing Jeffery which you falsely told this lie for over a decade.
Jeffery was a shrewd businessman. He never would have allowed a client the opportunity to just fire him on the spot. Eric Burdon and the Animals were under an ironclad contract. Chas Chandler was still under contract with Jeffery when they were both co-managing Jimi. The only reason Chandler was released from his contract is that he used the money he made off Jimi to buy out Jeffery from his contract. Jeffery had the same contract established for Jimi Hendrix which is why he wasn’t able to get out of it and was trying to buy Jeffery out but he died of an OD before that could happen.
So, the fact that Jeffery was in Spain the morning Jimi died, the fact Jimi was still under contract for 2 1/2 more years, and the fact Jimi wasn’t allowed “to fire” Jeffery makes your “murder hoax” go up in flames since there was never a “motive” for Jeffery to kill Hendrix.
BUSTER says: I had a personal conversation with Albert Allen and asked him why he didn’t say anything back then…I hope to release it in a future book…
JASON says: Ah, and here we have it. My suspicions that I had about you finally has been answered. So, you’re pushing this “Jimi Hendrix murder hoax” so you can write a book to make money off Jimi Hendrix just like all these other fraudsters have done over the years. Nobody would have gone to the lengths like that you have to push this debunked hoax if you weren’t trying to profit off of it. Now it’s finally been confirmed. Too bad I missed this old post though.
Albert Allen is another fraud. He had all through the 70’s to say something and never did. He only revealed his phony “nap on the couch” tale to make money off his useless book because he needed the cash so he made up a terrible lie to make money off his friend Jimi tarnishing his legacy. Disgraceful.
Another one of your imaginary “personal conversations” you had with someone. You are a joke.
BUSTER says: By the way, they didn’t wait 50 years and I have interviewed musicians who witnessed Albert speaking of it in the 70’s…Michael Jeffery was alive and was involved in contracting that movie when it was made…
JASON says: This is another lie. No musician has ever spoken about this phony decades later made up tale by Allen in the 70’s. When someone tells another person a “bombshell revelation” it gets around and people start to gossip as news spreads. This “story” would have gotten out back in the 70’s if it was told like all stories like this do. It never did which is why it never happened. And here we have one of your famous lies you use for you hoax: “I privately interviewed so and so and they told me this”. Just another scam you run to push your hoax as it’s all made up by you.
BUSTER says: If you ask me to take my evidence to the FBI you are only exposing your ignorance once again…FBI and COINTELPRO were accomplices if not the direct sponsors of Jimi’s murder…You ask a lot of questions, but you don’t ask why CIA, FBI, or even Scotland Yard didn’t look in to the murder of a US citizen overseas…
JASON says: First of all, you have no “evidence”. It’s either all made up bullshit invented by you or made up fake tales by well known fraudsters like Tappy Wright. He made up a fake tale for his book but he was too stupid not do any fact checking to know Jeffery was in Spain the morning Jimi died. So, his fake tale was easily debunked right from the start but you still use it for your hoax.
Second, there was no phony “Jimi Hendrix murder”. Jimi Hendrix clearly died from a massive barbiturate overdose so there was no reason to open up a 20+ year old investigation on a myth that hoaxers invented in the 90’s. So, that’s why SY never “looked into it” because there was no evidence to suggest a new investigation was warranted.
BUSTER says: I really wish I had contacted Kathy Etchingham back when she made her petition…I believe I could have added serious clout to her attempt…My Hendrix collector peer group were not intellectual types and I did not know of or subscribe to the Hendrix magazines of the day…In any case what I am typing here makes no difference whether it was entered back then or now…
JASON says: You are a clown and Kathy laughs at fools like you who continues to push this asinine Jimi Hendrix murder conspiracy.
BUSTER says: If you look at my last post I showed you court room level evidence that proves Jimi was murdered…You made no attempt to answer it…Instead you made very weak, specious points that were easily responded to and did not constitute any overturning or refutation of what I wrote…
JASON says: “court room level evidence”….hilarious!
What you wrote was an absolute joke made up a lightweight con man in which you certainly most are.
What you wrote was made up by you and you concocted it into a phony story as your claimed “evidence”.
You had 12 years to bring your “so called evidence” to the authorties and inside of a courtroom to argue it but you never have because you know yourself it’s all a scam. You are pushing this nonsense to write a book as you admitted to. You would be bounced out of a court in 2 seconds with your phony “evidence”.
BUSTER says: You can’t just ignore that Kathy proved Monika had lied about the time of death by as much as 6 hours…Dr Rufus Crompton said Jimi died no later than 5:30am because of the undigested rice in his stomach…This was also the time Eric Burdon admitted Monika first called…
JASON says: Another lie. Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated Jimi died no later than 4am. That is documented evidence. Which means Jimi was dead for hours and never had emergency “phony procedures” as you lied about.
BUSTER says: If you read what I wrote you can’t die from 9 Vesparax if you have a famous tolerance like Jimi…
JASON says: Of course you can die from 9 Vesparax pills. Jimi died from 9 Vesparax pills. Dr. Rufus Crompton confirmed that 4 Vesparax pills will cause death. Your phony “famous tolerance” claim is a scam so you can say Jimi couldn’t die from the pills. It’s a joke. Doctors only prescribed 1 Vesparax pill for a 150 pound person because any more would cause a serious overdose.
BUSTER says: And you especially can’t die if you only had the pills inside you for only 1 or 2 hours…Gleebeek found that persons who took 10 to 15 pills never died in less than 4 hours…And none of those victims were found with 5 bottles of wine flooding their lungs and stomach with only a trace blood alcohol content…
JASON says: Another lie and more horseshit from you. Most overdoses occur within the first hour of taking drugs.
Nobody has ever taken 10-15 Vesparax pills. Nobody on Earth could survive that amount.
1 Vesparax pill is 4 times the amount of 1 barbiturate.
9 pills equals 36 Mandrax pills. And you are saying Jimi Hendrix could swallow 40-60 Mandrax pills all at once and still not die? 10-15 Vesparax pills equals 40-60 Mandrax pills which were the pills Jimi was used to taking. You are full of shit and are nothing but a total clown.
There never was “5 bottles of wine” flooding Jimi Hendrix because you made up that lie yourself which you claimed “Bannister privately told you”. 3 years before this comment you claimed it was “3 bottles” and now you’ve upped it to 5. You are a just a total fraud.
BUSTER says: Jimi fired Jeffery at 5pm on the 17th and was found dead 12 hours later under dubious circumstances with everyone lying…Jeffery would have done jail time once his books were inspected because of the millions he stole…
JASON says: LOL. Jimi never “fired Jeffery” because he had no authority to do so. Jimi and Douglas were looking for a way to buy out Jeffery from his contract before Jimi died because that would have been the only way Jimi could have been released from it. Jeffery never would have released Jimi anyway with 2 1/2 years still left on his contract.
You are a weak amateur hoaxer making up the most asinine tales for your hoax. You should have done better research on the real Jimi Hendrix case so your fake stories aren’t so easily debunked.
Jimi signed a contract where 40% of his earnings went to Jeffery so he was well aware of how much money Jeffery took from him. Also, in 1970 right after Jimi died,
Buddy Miles accused Jeffery of stealing money. During Jimi’s funeral, Jeffery provided the receipts that proved no money was stolen from Miles or Hendrix. So, once again you use an old accusation that’s been already refuted for your hoax pretending Jeffery was up to sinister motives.
BUSTER says: Please answer these provable facts Ivana…So far you haven’t…
JASON says: Well I just refuted all your lies you made up and Ivana has done so as well. You never provide “provable facts” because there will never be “facts” for a scam you’ve been pushing for 12 years.
The reason I brought up Chris Welsh’s book is that it was written very close to Jimi’s death. He was therefore able to interview most of the people who had a relationship with Jimi. This book holds more credibility with me than books written many years later except for Tony Brown’s and Kathy Etchingham’s books. As I have said before I get my information from books regarding Jimi’s death. I have chosen to believe that Jimi was not murdered unlike yourself Buster. Unless you are Monika Danneman reincarnated then your information is also secondhand. The reason I stated you should go to the FBI is that you need to be accountable for the information you put out there because you are the one making these accusations about various people. You also seem to be casting your net wider and wider to include the Mafia. This has nothing to do with the Aleem twins appearing in the Warner Bros documentary and their subsequent book. For me your story is becoming less and less believable with every post. The people you knock just because they hold different views from your own makes me wonder whether you have an agenda. At the time of Kathy’s investigation, Gerry Stickells said people who remember what happened many years ago were making things up. I wonder whether he had a point? 🎓
Not murdered, you say? You gotta be kidding me !! Answer this question directly, Ivana — how the hell can any casualty have their stomach and lungs flooded with wine and a blood alcohol content of .005% (like Jimi did, as well as a blood reading of .7mg of quinalbarbitone) in any accidental death or suicide scenario. That is both physically and medically impossible in either of those two scenarios. There is only one scenario where such a thing a thing is possible — HOMICIDE. To not answer this directly, Ivana, is to instantly forfeit credibility regarding discussion, which I see you’ve done already.
Regarding Albert Allen, what he witnessed took place at Electric Lady studios in the U.S. Jimi’s death occurred in the UK — meaning there were no authorities that Albert Allen could turn to to tell what he had witnessed (everything regarding Jimi’s death was outside U.S. jurisdiction). It’s apparent that you didn’t read the article on this page very well, for if you did, you would have figured it out that this is who Roger Pomphrey was referring to (the Aleem Twins & this was back in 1997) about what he was told off-camera (try looking up).
You have my view on this issue. That is all I need to say and will be saying. I do not need to justify my opinion as I am not making accusations of murder.
Ivana — your opinion doesn’t count. It’s the facts and verified information regarding this case — which you’ve been shown in abundance, but failed to answer directly — that have the final say & what really count and render your opinion completely VOID. What I posted was not opinion, but based on fact, alone.
All you are doing is talking words without being able to back them. Sorry, but Scott Thompson was right about “talking out of your anal sphincter”.
All that is left for me to say is let the truth be known whatever that maybe.
Ivana — this is exactly what Buster and I have been giving to you — THE TRUTH. When I stated to you ” stomach and lungs flooded with wine and a blood alcohol content of .005% (like Jimi did, as well as a blood reading of .7mg of quinalbarbitone) ” cannot happen in any other scenario than homicide — you were being given the truth!! Time for you to put any opinion to the side and get on-board with it.
You had said that Buster had gotten his information second-hand, same as you. This is FALSE. Look up, and you will see that Buster stated that he had spoken directly to Dr. Bannister directly <— THAT, my dear, is NOT second-hand. That is first-hand from a prime witness that was there & spent nearly a half-hour suctioning red wine mixed with gastric contents from Jimi's lungs & stomach on Sept. 18, 1970.
By the way, for anyone thinking that Dr. Bannister was the first person to tell somebody from the press or media about red wine being found in Jimi — WRONG !! The first person to do that was the coroner Gavin Thurston when he told UPI representative Jack Meehan, on Sept. 29, 1970, that regarding Jimi's stomach contents, the autopsy revealed that "a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed". This info is in Sharon Lawrence's book "The Intimate Story of a Betrayed Musical Legend" & you can't make this up. Does anybody want to see a snapshot of that excerpt from that book regarding what Meehan told Sharon regarding his interview of Thurston just one day after the Inquest? Well, here it is:
FLYSWATTER says: Not murdered you say? You gotta be kidding me!! how the hell can any casualty have their stomach and lungs flooded with wine and a blood alcohol content of .005% (like Jimi did, as well as a blood reading of .7mg of quinalbarbitone) in any accidental death or suicide scenario. That is both physically and medically impossible in either of those two scenarios. There is only one scenario where such a thing a thing is possible — HOMICIDE.
What’s physically and medically impossible is your bogus wine hoax. Hendrix never had his lungs and stomach “flooded with wine”. There is no St. Mary Abbot Hospital report or autopsy report stating there was “stomach and lungs flooded with wine”.This is all make believe fantasy.
FLYSWATTER says: Regarding Albert Allen, what he witnessed took place at Electric Lady studios in the U.S. Jimi’s death occurred in the UK — meaning there were no authorities that Albert Allen could turn to to tell what he had witnessed (everything regarding Jimi’s death was outside U.S. jurisdiction).
No one to turn to eh? Nice fake cover story for Allen’s fake story. I guess you’re ignorant how international laws work. If Hendrix was murdered (which he wasn’t) in the UK then the killers would be brought to the US to face charges. Also, there is the media. If a murder story came out, the UK would have to charge people to avoid a national scandal of a murdered rock superstar. Your fake cover story along with Allen’s fake story has proven to be just that….fake.
Flyswatter, I appreciate any effort made to establish the truth of what happened that morning to Jimi. Anyone, family, friend or fan I think would understand this. I am a fan who is saddened by the loss of a great musician, and I believe we are all on board with this one.
Ivana — if you are sincere about appreciation of “any effort made to establish the truth of what happened that morning to Jimi”, then please get on-board with the truths that Buster and I have shown you.
Don’t go the same route as the author of that “death of Jimi Hendrix” site. As Buster said, the author of that site is not credible, just looking for any excuses to deny that Jimi was murdered, and he’s been called out elsewhere & counter-attacked and slaughtered, which you can see for yourself in the link below, but a word of warning — this site isn’t for the timid or feint of heart and separates the men from the boys:
http://www.toughreality.net/hendrix/nine.html
Touche’
Ivana – You’re just ignoring what I’m saying and once again referring to your own useless dialogue…Your input does have one good aspect though…It shows a good example of denial psychology and how people avoid the facts that prove Jimi was murdered…
I don’t understand why you keep referring to Chris Welch…Welch is not a good source because he never touches the murder topic or any of the evidence like many British sources…I suppose with your denial intent you prefer authors who don’t mention the murder subject…
Your assertion above that I am some kind of Alex Jones who needs to be brought in to legal accountability for the accusations he makes is really ballsy considering all the facts and evidence you have contemptuously ignored here…Your saying my evidence is second hand is just your way of dishonestly avoiding what I quoted from Monika and how it was proven by the facts and evidence you ignored…Your responses here are not credible…They represent disingenuous regressions from what I posted and a deliberate attempt to avoid the FACTS I am showing…
It is a statement of abject ignorance to say I should go to the FBI when all the facts in this case show FBI involvement in the cover-up…I don’t take your suggestion that I should go to FBI seriously…You are only saying that because I mentioned Bob Levine’s saying I should go to FBI…The only reason Bob said that was because he realized my proof was good…Frankly when you say it I take it as the trolling point it is…Anyone who had a credible understanding of this subject would know that Jeffery being Military Intelligence would pre-empt any honest investigation by FBI…You show ignorance of the COINTELPRO era that disqualifies you from credibility on this issue…
No Ivana, your input shows an unqualified, wishy washy logic that exposes a lack of serious research on the subject that you are gratuitously denying…What I said about Warner Brothers, their mob connections, and their still being under contract to a living Jeffery, are all true and your dumbed-down level of response and reasoning did not credibly answer it…You failed to honestly answer that with Jeffery and Warner’s being in control of the 1973 ‘Soundtrack’ movie there was not going to be any talk about murder in that film…Your entries not only show serious ignorance but also show an intention of not honestly acknowledging correct explanations of what you cite…Frankly your answers are idiotic and show a brazen contempt for honest discussion…What you are failing to honestly address here is the specious points you previously made to justify your denial were all bogus and easily overturned…Instead of honestly answering that you have veered further off in to the ridiculous in order to evade those points…You’re just doubling-down on opinionating in order to evade clearly spelled-out facts and evidence both myself and Flyswatter have detailed…
If you were seriously interested in the evidence you pretend to call for you would not have ignored the 5 hour delay and how it affects the forensic evidence that I discussed…If those forensic arguments are over your head and comprehension ability that is not my fault…All you are showing people is you can’t acknowledge or answer a sound forensic legal argument when shown…It is you who is guilty of what you accuse me of and it is YOU who won’t allow someone to prove it with a sound argument of evidence…If you respond please answer my forensic argument that is based on the 5 hour delay…Otherwise don’t waste our time…
Buster you are reading too much into what I am saying. Fans need to hear every side to the story so we can form our own opinions about what happened to Jimi. The reason I mentioned Chris Welsh is that he was able to interview Chas Chandler, Noel Redding, Gerry Stickells, Eric Barrett, Michael Jeffrey, and Jeanette Jacobs all of whom had a close relationship to Jimi shortly after Jimi died. He also had access to the major rock stars of the day including Jimi. That is why his book has more relevance than the others written decades later except for Tony Brown. I also mentioned you should go to the relevant authorities with your considerable evidence so that Jimi’s death can be treated as a cold case rather than just another conspiracy theory. Please do not treat other authors research or my posts with contempt in order to heighten your credibility. Your work needs to stand on its own two feet.
My work is standing on its own in its forcing you to back down from your previous statements…Yes, fans needing to hear all the facts is exactly why I started posting on this as soon as I learned about it…So your citation of sources that either deliberately avoid or misconstrue the true facts probably doesn’t help…
What you say about Chris Welch isn’t correct…The proper way to look at Welch is to determine how much he probed in to the subject when he had a chance…It is one thing to have close access to Hendrix people, it is another to put it to good use…You’ll find the closer people are to either rock journalism or the Hendrix management community the less likely they were to risk the personal consequences of looking in to the issue…Once Welch was chosen as the spokesperson who backed the official story by saying Jimi died of a barbiturate overdose in the Hendrix Company 2013 documentary, and never once mentioned his murder, you can dismiss him as a source…Michael was still alive when Welch researched his book…Welch, like many other Hendrix authors, was writing for himself and his career…He wasn’t writing for Jimi…There’s a lot of epic cowardice in this and many people who were close to Hendrix are not risking their skin…
Ivana – I can tell from your posts that you have very little researched knowledge of this case…In any case, I think you have that backwards and it is you and Purple Jim who have treated what can only be called sound proof for Jimi’s murder with contempt by ignoring it and coming in on the side of the wrong conclusion…You can’t tell the tiger how to hunt you and if you enter insulting denial of the evidence that Jimi was murdered then you’ll have to take what follows in the real world where people do real defenses…
You don’t seem to understand the full circumstances of this in regard to the authorities…The authorities were already gone to by Kathy Etchingham…Kathy showed them more than enough to re-investigate the case…Instead they lied, avoided seeking critical witnesses, and stonewalled Kathy…You don’t seem to register that the authorities are a suspect in this case and are intentionally preventing any honest investigation because if that honest investigation were truly done it would inevitably lead right back to those same authorities and show serious signs that they were directly involved at the time…There’s serious questions on all levels, including Jeffery’s Military Intelligence membership and the strong possibility it was protected in the non-investigation…There are also serious questions about the British government assisting its main ally’s Central Intelligence Agency and FBI in eliminating what they considered a serious subversive who they placed on their “Security Index”…These people were out to kill the 60’s and decapitating one of its most charismatic leaders succeeded in doing that very effectively… Once Jimi was on the Security Index then that means they were monitoring him, and once they were monitoring him they had to know about his troubles with Jeffery…I would imagine they would be monitoring his phone calls and knew he called Steingarten to fire Jeffery 12 hours before he died…No Ivana, this is no playing field for beginner level opinions and anyone well familiar with those agencies would know they were more likely to be stoking the problems between Jeffery and Jimi rather than investigating them…To suggest those authorities are not already well aware of all this is foolish and naively unaware of the world at minimum, if not uninformed of the already established record…
Yes, Jimi fans and anyone else interested in how governments operate need to know the facts…There’s a reason your source Purple Jim has no discussion section on his website and never comes out in public to answer for his deliberately deceptive article…Please show me Chris Welch talking about this anywhere…
Sorry Buster your post is sounding more and more like a conspiracy theory and has therefore lost its appeal for me. I have decided not to post anymore opinions since all I have are opinions since I never knew Jimi personally. All the best and goodbye.
The fact that Monika devoted her life to painting her pictures of Jimi and turning her home into a Hendrix shrine tells me that this woman had nothing to do with murdering Jimi. Also her outburst at Harvey’s apartment meant that she truly believed she was Jimi’s fiancé. I have watched the David Henderson interview and he uses the words “I think” and “I don’t know” quite a bit in conversation. He also states that Devon Wilson was not a groupie, and he writes in his book that Noel and Mitch never saw Jimi as their equal something they both found very offensive. Michael Jeffrey was in Spain when Jimi passed away, and Tappy Wright admitted his phoney story of Jimi being murdered. The number of times Buster mentions what people told him off camera makes me question his credibility and something we cannot verify. Buster and Flyswatter have set themselves up as the beacons of the truth and anyone who challenges this is misguided and delusional. The people he knocks the most are the people who knew Jimi personally. Buster befriended Bob Levine, an old man confined to a nursing home, five years before his death, in order to coax out of him a now defunct myth. But Buster keeps at it and he seems to find newer ways to further his claims.
Ivana — I’m going to tell you quite truthfully, that you come across like a chicken running around after having its head cut off (same as your brother, Jason). Let’s break down what you just posted above & it will clearly illustrate that. We’ll start with this:
“The fact that Monika devoted her life to painting her pictures of Jimi and turning her home into a Hendrix shrine tells me that this woman had nothing to do with murdering Jimi. Also her outburst at Harvey’s apartment meant that she truly believed she was Jimi’s fiancé. I have watched the David Henderson interview and he uses the words “I think” and “I don’t know” quite a bit in conversation. He also states that Devon Wilson was not a groupie, and he writes in his book that Noel and Mitch never saw Jimi as their equal something they both found very offensive”
Very interesting how you strain at a gnat where David Henderson is concerned & swallow a camel where Monika Dannemann is concerned. Try looking up at the photocopy of the sworn deposition by the London Ambulance Service. If Monika had nothing to with Jimi’s death, then why wasn’t she at the Samarkand flat when the ambulancemen arrived? Why did she lie about that event so profusely? And why did she, shortly after Jimi died, travel all the way from Europe to Electric Lady Studios in the US, to show Mike Jeffery her Samarkand photos — two of which Albert Allen saw that clearly showed Jimi’s dead body on her bed? Regarding David Henderson, he quotes that London Ambulance Service deposition exactly word for word in his book, exactly like you see in the pic above.
Next we have this:
“Michael Jeffrey was in Spain when Jimi passed away, and Tappy Wright admitted his phoney story of Jimi being murdered.”
You have no way of knowing for certain of Jeffery’s whereabouts at the exact time Jimi died (which, according to Dr. Crompton could not have been later than 5:30AM, due to the undigested grains of rice found in). Spain is just a 2 hour plane ride from England. There was 5 hour delay in calling the ambulance — plenty of time for any perpetrator to escape. Jeffery may have been in Spain when the news got there that Jimi died, but that was many hours later in the day. Jeffery’s exact locale at the exact time Jimi died cannot be verified by anybody in Spain.
As for Tappy, you’re just regurgitating the same thing that Scott Thompson called you out on, but once again, providing no source of this. Every interview that I’ve heard with Tappy, (and this is over a 10-year span) he says the exact opposite. BTW, I’ve never bought Tappy’s book, because I only need to listen to this audio clip of what Monika tells Caeser Gleebeek in a 1975 radio interview (provided in the link below) about the Mafia being behind Jimi’s death to easily distinguish how what Monika says lines up with Tappy’s claim.
[audio src="http://www.toughreality.net/hendrix/images/monika.ogg" /]
And next we have this:
“The number of times Buster mentions what people told him off camera makes me question his credibility and something we cannot verify.”
Just because you can’t verify it, doesn’t make it untrue. Who have you spoken to directly that is connected to this case or knew Jimi personally? Yeah, that’s just what I thought — NOBODY !!!
And we continue with this:
“Buster and Flyswatter have set themselves up as the beacons of the truth and anyone who challenges this is misguided and delusional.”
TRANSLATED: You can’t answer directly the questions that Buster and I have asked you directly, and can’t answer or refute any of the germane points that we’ve made. You say that Buster and I have “set themselves up as the beacons of the truth” — well, do tell us — what exactly have you and your brother Jason set yourselves up as with your continued evasive blather? That’s right — a pair of chickens running around with their heads cut off, in addition to exposing yourselves as lovers & makers of lies that have no interest in the truth regarding this case (which is evidenced by the two of you employing the little girlish copout of ‘can’t attack the message, so attack the messenger’ regarding any testimony given by anybody that refutes your phony narrative).
And then we also have:
“The people he knocks the most are the people who knew Jimi personally.”
Excuse me, but Monika Dannemann deserves every knock against her, as Tony Brown showed in his book “Hendrix — The Final Days” and proved that Monika was lying regarding what happened on the morning Jimi died. As for Kathy, it was simply said that she didn’t know of Albert Allen’s witnessing when she made that comment regarding Jeffery and that she doesn’t go any further than Monika when she’s asked about what happened with Jimi. Not a knock on her — just a factual statement. Show us where Buster or I have knocked people like Noel Redding, Mitch Mitchell, Billy Cox, Buddy Miles, Juma Sultan, or the Aleem Twins, since you are mentioning people that knew Jimi personally. Try looking up & you will see that it is Jason doing that regarding the Aleem Twins.
And then there is this:
“Buster befriended Bob Levine, an old man confined to a nursing home, five years before his death, in order to coax out of him a now defunct myth. But Buster keeps at it and he seems to find newer ways to further his claims.”
At least we have the proof that Buster did indeed speak directly to Bob Levine. What have you provided to substantiate anything that you’ve said? NOTHING !!
Oh, and let us not overlook this from Aug. 5th:
” I have decided not to post anymore opinions since all I have are opinions since I never knew Jimi personally”
And yet, here you are nine days later doing exactly that. Unable to make up our mind, are we? Try looking up, and you’ll see that Buster & I have been here quite some time & we aren’t going anywhere
Isn’t the whole premise of this the supposed murder of Jimi Hendrix by Michael Jeffrey and Monika Danneman? What exactly was it that Buster got out of Bob Levine a few maybes and it’s possible? I do not purport to know the truth as you do. I have opinions from the books I read. MJ was in Spain and Wright admitted he made the whole thing up. The lies have been exposed so what is this all for? We know that Monika was across the street with Terry Slater awaiting the ambulance and that Jimi was lying on the bed fully clothed covered in vomit. She then tried to cover her tracks by suggesting that the ambulance officers and/or doctors acted in an unprofessional manner as implied by Tony Brown. It’s common knowledge the ambulance was called five hours later as revealed by Dee Mitchell, Kathy and Michael Fairchild. Monika then turned her house into Hendrix shrine with her paintings as revealed by Kathy. Noel Redding wrote in his book that Monika’s life centred around Jimi after he died. He also states that the delay in calling the ambulance may have resulted in Jimi’s death. Monika later married Uli Jon Roth but apparently it did not last because Jimi was Monika’s true love according to her. These are the facts Flyswatter. Where does Buster get his supposed truths? Who are his sources? Please don’t say Bob Levine, the FBI or the Aleem twins.
Ivana: Is that the best you can get out of what we’ve shown?…Don’t you have any sense of criminal detection what so ever?…Albert Allen’s witnessing is real…I know because I spoke to him in person and the record of his witnessing shows he told it to people as far back as the 1970’s…We know it is real because Albert mentioned the famous Samarkand photos of Jimi that Monika took before anyone knew about them…Albert witnessed Monika plotting against Jimi with Michael…He heard her saying that certain photos she was showing to Jeffery could be used to make the case that Jimi was visibly destroying himself with drugs so badly that you could see it in his appearance…In other words those photos could be used to cover-up the real cause of death they both knew of…This evidence puts everything else in perspective and, unless you have no mind at all, makes anyone who looks at this realize Monika’s true position in all this and explains her whole presence regarding Jimi…Stickells’ flat being two blocks away then becomes obvious as the close-by Jeffery outpost that arranged the nearby Samarkand death trap that it is…Monika’s being swung in to Jimi’s presence in that last week then takes on clear new meaning…There’s no way Scotland Yard would ignore all this if it were honestly investigating so what right do you have to ignore it?…You’re ignoring the most damning evidence and trying to use the weakest examples of those who spin against the murder evidence by distorting quotes…How dare you, considering what we’ve already shown…
You’re not asking the necessary questions of why Scotland Yard never went and interviewed Tappy Wright or tried to find out more?…The man made a serious claim…You would think they would be interested?…Or why they showed no interest in Monika saying on the air in 1975 “Jimi was murdered for sure”?…You would think that might spark some curiosity in them?…Or why they never sought-out and interviewed the nurses about the wine?…Or why the Inquest itself never called any of the emergency personnel or doctors to the witness stand?…You’re highly doubtful and critical of us but you are very forgiving of what can only be called guilty avoidance of normal investigative practices in the formal inquiry…
I take exception over being portrayed as a person who bothers old people in nursing homes…That’s a vicious slander…I first encountered Bob Levine in 2011…I went to his house in 2012 and a couple of times after…Bob was sent to the nursing home in 2014 mostly because of his legal blindness from a previous stroke…He died in July 2016…I visited him several times in that nursing home and realized I was the only person who did…Bob was touched by that and told me “I consider you like a son”…In 2016 I realized no one had recorded Bob’s true thoughts on how he was being used by biased journalists like Bosso and Glebbeek, so I called him and told him I needed a favor…Bob agreed and said no problem I’ll do a video…I then went and got what Bob told me in many phone conversations recorded on video…Someone needed to set the record straight on Glebbeek’s dishonest use of Bob in his 2011 ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication…In any case it is terribly dishonest to ignore that Bob was clearly pointing fingers of suspicion towards Jeffery in McDermott’s ‘Setting The Record Straight’ (1992)…Bob said that he could not find Jeffery for a week after Jimi died and was trying to contact him in Spain…When he finally contacted Jeffery he pretended to not know Jimi had died even though there were many witnesses, like Jim Marron, who saw Jeffery being informed the day it happened…Jeffery was acting like a guilty man and there is no doubt that is what Bob was hinting at when he was first interviewed about the subject in 1990…
I did not coax anything out of Bob as ‘Setting The Record Straight’ clearly shows…I realized that I had been the first person to inform Bob of serious evidence that he needed to know and he quickly agreed because he sensed that it rang true according to his personal experiences as Jimi’s manager and a close associate of Michael Jeffery…Anyone who ignores this true context is being willfully dishonest and should not be taken seriously…They’ve had their turn at this and have done great damage to Jimi Hendrix and his true history…
Expressing opinions is a good thing, and I’m all in favor of it. Even better is the expression of educated, informed opinion, and citation of sources that can be verified is even better. When informed opinion is expressed with cited sources and incontrovertible facts can be established this builds a firm foundation for further research. On the other hand, purposely and willfully uninformed and misinforming opinions never serve the interests of the public, and they are usually as welcome in a discussion as the intestinal vapor their …fortitutde…discharges.
Certain voices on this thread are willfully ignorant and attempting to bludgeon the voices of the more informed by trying to shout them down with the same moronic refrains.
It is a fact, not an opinion, that Michael Jeffery worked for the British Secret Service.
In their book, HENDRIX: SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT (1992), John McDermott and Eddie Kramer (the latter of whom worked for Michael Jeffery) write the following: [pp. 48-50]
“If Jeffery had developed anything during his brief career in the entertainment industry, it was an acute skill for manipulating people to serve his wishes. A brilliant negotiator, he was not a blustering, physically overpowering figure. He was charming, well educated, slight and soft-spoken. Beneath his effete veneer, though, was a supremely cunning and inventive mind. Like Chandler, he too had grown up in the North. Jeffery was an ex-MI5 member with combat experience, serving in Britain’s Suez operation during 1957-58. While in Egypt, Jeffery displayed the first glimmer of his notorious business acumen.
At the beginning of his military career, “ recalls John Hillman [Yameta director and one of Jeffery’s personal attorneys], “Jeffery was a ranking nothing [he would later rise to the rank of captain]; he was, however, a shrewd businessman in the making. While serving in Egypt, Jeffery discovered that newspapers were like gold to the soldiers. Everyone was craving for news about home. English newspapers, three days old, were selling for two dollars apiece. Jeffery decided that the sensible thing would be to find a source for the newspapers and go into business. He found out that in Cairo there was a news agent who sold papers from abroad that were only two days old. It was against regulations for British soldiers to venture into Cairo without permission. Regardless, Jeffery hired of of his squaddies to drive him to the news agent evry week with a truck. They collected the newspapers, and Jeffery began selling them to the British army in Suez at two dollars each. The practice was highly illegal, but Jeffery was earning wads of money….
Jeffery was, as a well, a student of Machiavellian tactics, and employed such techniques as divide and conquer. As Chas Chandler recalls: “Jeffery used to use anything he could to keep people off balance. You didn’t realize how much you had been manipulated until you were out of his circle. Suddenly it was like you woke up. Because he couldn’t get close to Jimi, he would drive a wall between myself and Jimi.”
I invent everyone to turn to page 358 of McDermott’s book, where they will find the extensive index reference pages on Michael Jeffery, co-authored by one of his former employees and mainly written by the primary publicist for the Experience Hendrix foundation, which does, in fact, have a certain of amount of status and credibility, don’t you think?
I wrote INVITE and not INVENT.
Scott, you’re quite correct in this assessment:
“Certain voices on this thread are willfully ignorant and attempting to bludgeon the voices of the more informed by trying to shout them down with the same moronic refrains.”
Both of these two individuals (Ivana and Jason) are following the Nazi Germany protocol of “accuse the other side of that which you are guilty of”. I’m quite certain that Joseph Goebbels (the chief Nazi propaganda minister) would have been happy to recruit both of them during the Nazi Germany regime.
Flyswatter this is just crazy talk. Really nutty. All this nonsense for an opinion post. You are over the top.
No Ivana — it is just simply telling it like it is and you can’t stomach the reality of it.
No Ivana — it is simply telling it like it is, but you simply can’t stomach it.
Regarding the “Machiavellian” dimension of Michael Jeffery mentioned by McDermott and the Questionable Reliability of Statements by Trixie Sullivan
“Jeffery himself was growing disillusioned with Yameta. When he became short of funds an associate would be sent down to Nassau to the Bank of Nova Scotia, to surreptitiously withdraw cash and smuggle it back to New York. Leon Dicker, Yameta’s American representative fondly recalls Trixie Sullivan, Jeffery’s secretary, returning from such a mission, unbuttoning her shirt in his office and subtracting bundles of cash from her bra. “Michael always knew how to beat the system.”” (McDermott: 126)
*******
With this introductory remark regarding both her overall integrity and the extent of her loyalty to Michael Jeffery, let’s now revisit Trixie Sullivan’s remarks made on the BAND OF GYPSYS documentary.
I refer to the infamous Madison Square Garden concert plug-puller when Jimi Hendrix was simply too incoherent to perform. It has been alleged that Jimi had been dosed by Jeffery with LSD or another psychedelic.
“Buddy Miles claims that Michael Jeffery, in a deliberate effort to sabotage the Band of Gypsys’ performance, slipped Hendrix LSD backstage. ‘Both my sister and I saw Jeffery slip Hendrix two tabs of acid, and I personally saw Hendrix take them. He looked so scared.” (McDermott, 1992: 250).
McDermott immediately follows this with the statement that “No other member of Hendrix’s management team present at the concert accepts the sabotage story.”
(McDermott: Ibid.).
A few paragraph before this we learn that “At some point amid the crush of activity backstage, Hendrix became too stoned to perform—either unknowingly or by design.” Bob Levine is then cited: “He was out of it so badly.” Gerry Stickells is cited, recalling that Hendrix did not want to go on stage. “I had to convince him to perform.” (McDermott: Ibid.)
Great job, Gerry!
If Gerry Stickells had to convince Jimi to perform when Jimi himself knew that he should not do so and would do a bad job, why then would Stickells ever publicly aknowledge that his own boss had undermined the show.
Returning to the documentary.
04:23—04:30 Trixie Sullivan: “The relationship with Mike Jeffery, as manager to Jimi, was very simple: Mike took care of all the business side of things, he got money when we could, he did the money side of it, and he left Jimi TOTALLY, TOTALLY in charge of the artistic side of it.”
At approximately 43 minutes into the film, Jim Marron somewhat uncomfortably mentions that the Allen Brothers “were working on him” [Jimi] to get him more involved in the Black Nationalist movement.
43:44: A. Allen: “He [Jimi] began to lean toward some of those elements…like The Panthers…the so-called ‘street people’…that association was necessary for him…”
To which Gerry Stickells responds with:
44:17 Gerry Stickells: “When we went out, Jimi never thought of himself as black…(then falters, smiles embarrassedly, tries awkwardly to rephrase)….”
51:10 A, Allen: Now the issues that he was discussing. The war, the pain…this is a whole separate thing besides the music, so when you put it together you have “Machine Gun”…
This segues into a brief discussion of Miles Davis, Jimi Hendrix and jazz
60:33 “ Jim Marron [in response to Jimi possibly working with Miles on jazz material]…Michael Jeffery hated the idea because it’s not a lucrative field…If you wanna make money in the record business, you better stick to rock n roll.”
76:15 Buddy Miles: “The Band of Gypsys was a strong personal statement by three brothers…”
Madison Square Garden Affair
77:23 Jim Marron: “That was a pitiful concert. I was given ringside seats for my family and myself, and when I saw the state Jimi entered the stage on … a half hour late…maybe an hour…I wanted to crawl under the seat I was in and deny any association with him…
[Only by reading McDermott, p. 251 do we know precisely what embarrassed Marron]
77:43: Billy Cox: “Jimi was staggering. Somebody’d given him something….Buddy was really pissed off…”
77:56: Buddy Miles: “How would you feel? (Suppressing tears) I was very hurt for him, and – excuse me – I, just, ah, I really hated to see it. “
88:16 Jim Marron: “It was a shame. It was an embarrassment. It was probably a low point of Hendrix’s career….”
88:26 Trixie Sullivan: “I think it wasn’t working. The two new members of the group. And I think [ she looks up and to the side] they had to finish….Look, you can look for a million reasons, and you can say it was this and it was that, but it’s because it really wasn’t working.”
89:02 Buddy Miles: I thought it was unfair. … ‘cause of the fact that … the management did not want the three brothers playing together. Three blacks.
89:25 Gerry Stickells: I really don’t think that is a fair assessment .. to say that Mike Jeffery or whoever was involved didn’t want an entirely black band. That’s not fair.
89:34: Trixie Sullivan: If you’re talking specifically about Buddy Miles being in the group, and Mike sacking him, it would have been TOTALLY on Jimi’s instigation. Under no circumstances would Mike Jeffery come in and sack people without Jimi’s permission, approval, and [she looks up and, nodding to herself in confirmation] in fact his instigation.”
And yet, John McDermott w/ Eddie Kramer have written something quite different:
“Backstage, Jeffery reiterated his demand that the Band of Gypsys were to be disbanded following the performance. His desire to fire Miles, says Gene McFadden, was delivered with such relish that it infuriated Hendrix.” (McDermott, 1992: 250)
This account entirely contradicts Trixie Sullivan’s statement that Jeffery did not involve himself in the artistic aspects of the group. Jim Marron’s statements regarding Jeffery’s fear that Jimi would go more into jazz also contradicts Ms. Sullivan.
Having been told by McDermott that she smuggled money for Jeffery, having seen her words entirely contradicted by McDermott, Buddy Miles, and Jim Marron, why should any informed viewer necessarily take any one of her statements on film on face value? Why should she be considered believable in any way, shape or form?
Conflicting information. The ambulance was called after five hours and the ambulance officers said that Jimi was clearly dead. When Jimi arrived at the hospital I read he went straight down to the morgue. Another doctor said he worked on Jimi the implication being that Jimi was alive when admitted. Otherwise why would he try and resuscitate someone who had been dead for hours. Dr. Bannister said that Jimi was an usually tall man and he said he did not know who Jimi Hendrix was. This beckons the question was this Jimi Hendrix or did he have him mixed up with another patient? No mention of red wine in the coroners report or at the inquest. The red wine story surfaces many years later. Jeffrey is accused of murdering Jimi byTappy Wright who then confesses he made the whole thing up. Trixie Sullivan and Jim Marron both said MJ was in Spain, and now Trixie is being made to look like someone who would cover up a murder in order to look like a devoted employee. The Aleem twins look very happy and relaxed in both their interviews again no mention of the supposed conversation between Monika and MJ this just happens to coincide with the release of their book. How opportunistic! Monika then devotes her life to painting portraits of Jimi and turning her home into a shrine. She then states that she was engaged to Jimi in order to enhance her status giving many interviews and appearing in magazines and documentaries.Odd behaviour for a supposed murderer. Bob Levine said in his interview with Buster that maybe, it’s possible that MJ murdered Jimi but then in another interview dismisses this completely as a total fabrication. So where does this leave Buster, Scott and Flyswatter in a galaxy far far away in black hole. NO REPLY NECESSARY. THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE BUT NOWHERE TO SEEN IN MOST OF THESE POSTS. Goodbye.
No, it doesn’t leave Scott, Buster, and I, in any galaxy far away in a black hole. Your post simply illustrates that you don’t use your head for anything other than a suppository, as evidenced by your statement “THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE BUT NOWHERE TO SEEN IN MOST OF THESE POSTS”. That it totally false. The fact is there is very little useful input or information in YOUR posts. Just the same regurgitated bunk over and over.
Oh, and “NO REPLY NECESSARY”, huh? Says who? You going to get it, regardless. I’ll start with this bit:
“Dr. Bannister said that Jimi was an usually tall man and he said he did not know who Jimi Hendrix was. This beckons the question was this Jimi Hendrix or did he have him mixed up with another patient?”
That line of BS can easily be refuted with pictorial proof. In 1993 Dr. Bannister made the public statement that Jimi was wearing “jumper or towel that was saturated in red wine”. What is it that we see Jimi wearing in the pic below that was taken less than 24 hours before Dr. Bannister attended to Jimi? Sure looks very much like that very “jumper or towel” that Dr. Bannister spoke of to anybody that has a properly functioning pair of eyeballs.
What gullible and uninformed Ivana doesn’t know is the posted photo of Jimi was taken in the afternoon of the 17th at the Samarkand garden behind the townhouse…That large scarf around Jimi’s neck is Monika’s…The doctor whom Ivana and Jason call a shameless fraud, Dr Bannister, said in his description of trying to save Jimi that he had a towel or jumper (“Jumper” is an English word for light blouse) around his neck that was soaked in red wine…For many years the sources Ivana is so innocently quoting tried to say Dr Bannister mistook a taller patient for Jimi and got confused, however this Samarkand photo taken by Monika cinches the deal and shows the scarf Dr Bannister referred to when describing the patient he removed 5 bottles of wine from…Monika did not release this photo until her book was published in 1995…Someone did show that she released some of the photos but the place they were seen was a rock publication Dr Bannister did not have access to and did not read since he had no interest in that kind of music…Nor did he have access to any of the Samarkand garden images over in Australia…This proves the man Dr Bannister treated was Jimi because Dr Bannister had no way of knowing about that scarf unless he had seen it in person on the individual he treated that morning…Ivana and Jason are being silly because it is a matter of hospital record that Dr Bannister and Dr Siefert were on duty on the 18th…These deniers allow themselves any kind of absurdity and make Dr Bannister an idiot who doesn’t remember what happened or who he treated…However the above is undeniable proof and establishes beyond a doubt that the person who was soaked in wine whom Dr Bannister removed 5 bottles of wine from was Jimi Hendrix, as proven in exhibit A above…Those websites Ivana instantly trusts got awfully quiet awfully quick when we produced this…The photo is one of those Monika was showing Michael Jeffery when Albert Allen suddenly surprised them…That is also proof of the veracity of Albert’s witnessing because he too had no way of knowing of those secret Samarkand photos Monika hadn’t released to the public…I have yet to see truth-seeking Ivana give an honest answer to this other than throwing a bunch of denier garbage up against it and hoping it will stick…Ivana also ignores that there were witnesses to Albert telling that story as far back as the 1970’s…
The red wine story did not surface many years later…It came out on the 29th of September 1970 when reporter Jack Meehan got Chief Coroner Gavin Thurston to speak about it…Ivana has failed to answer that this is proof that Thurston had knowledge of the wine and therefore failed in his duty to process it against the trace blood alcohol content…This is proof of malfeasance by the investigating authorities because it was Thurston’s duty as Chief Coroner to apply what that told him to the cause of death determination and he failed to do so…Any sound-minded investigator would then realize the lack of any calling of the ambulance men or doctors to the Inquest was not a mistake and that Thurston and the Inquest were stood down by covert intervention…The Thurston witnessing is proof of a wrinkle in the investigation that indicates official corruption…Thurston had to learn of that wine from somebody so it was either Dr Siefert as the head registrar or Dr Teare as the main autopsist…If it was Teare then we also have evidence of malfeasance because Teare did not record that wine in his autopsy report…And if you have good detective skills you’ll notice that Teare later adjusted the barbiturate blood level upward in a supplementary autopsy procedure…Dr Teare also made an estimation of the blood alcohol level at the time of ingestion of the Vesparax…These are illegal measures that go against autopsy law that were obviously designed to bolster the claimed overdose and drug/alcohol conflict official cause of death…Anyone with any common sense who looks at the bigger picture we have exposed will see Dr Teare’s illegal adjustments and estimations were due to his realization that the forensics didn’t add up…He realized there wasn’t enough barbiturate and proceeded to adjust it upwards…He also realized there wasn’t enough alcohol and proceeded to make an illegal adjustment upward that was based on Monika’s false timeline…Estimations are not allowed in autopsies…Just on this information alone the Hendrix family has a serious lawsuit against the Crown…If people don’t see how Jeffery’s Military Intelligence status works in to all this then they are fools…
Buster’s “Grand Conspiracy” reaches new levels. Is everybody reading this? Buster is now accusing London’s top pathologist Dr. Teare of illegally adjusting autopsy numbers so Buster can still claim his phony wine murder myth. LOL
Buster is also claiming that Dr. Teare, Monika Dannemann, and Mike Jeffery were all in on the plot together. According to Buster, Dr. Teare illegally fixed the autopsy numbers at Jeffery’s demands to coincide with Monika’s testimony. Jeffery never had any military intelligence.
This stuff is pure comedy. Even a Hollywood script wouldn’t be this bad. I guess when you have no evidence of wine to prove, you gotta make it up.
Jimi Hendrix was famous for wearing a jumper so Buster’s and Flyswatter’s attempt at using Monika’s last photos of Hendrix for Bannister’s wine recollection is pathetic. Bannister could easily view a Hendrix album cover or photo in a book and say he had a jumper. He thought Hendrix was an “unusually tall man” who “was naked” that day. How is he going to remember a jumper from 1970?
Bannister wrote the official hospital statement on Hendrix’s death in 1970. He specifically stated “due to a barbiturate overdose”. Bannister never wrote anything about “5 bottles of wine in his lungs” as the cause of death. Why didn’t Bannister state wine as the official cause of death on 9/18/70 if he claimed in 1992 he had lungs full of wine?
The Aleem claim is phony as well but Buster continues to parrot it as fact. A total joke.
Jack Meehan was never told that “Hendrix was imbibed with wine” by Thurston. That was another made up quote by Sharon Lawrence for her phony book. Out of all the people in the world Dr. Gavin Thurston only told Jack Meehan about “imbibed wine” when every reporter under the sun asked Thurston about Hendrix? Give me a freaking break. Lawrence lied and you keep using her fake quote as “evidence”.
Buster hilariously tries to create his own fake story for the absence of wine. This conspiracy story he tells is hilarious and most of all pathetic. Buster accuses Dr. Teare of illegally adjusting the alcohol numbers for the Hendrix autopsy at Michael Jeffery’s request. Can you believe that? Buster makes up his own fake stories for evidence. LOL.
Dr. Teare did not illegally adjust numbers at Jeffery’s request. Jeffery was never in British Intelligence. The highest rank he had in the Army was private. Dr. Thurston wrote the final autopsy report. You are making up fake stories Buster.
Buster has no evidence for the absence of wine so he makes up a fake story in his head for “his evidence” so he can appear to look correct. Pathetic.
Nice try at recreating events that never happened trying to change history. Jimi wasn’t wearing these clothes when he died. Jimi took a bath where he wrote his final poem and changed his clothes before going out again. So you failed with your attempt to give phony credit to Bannister. You tin foil hatters will stoop to anything to promote your fake and phony claims.
It is quite clear that Justin Ames has lost integrity – despite all those great photos- by allowing this provocateur named Ivana to slander individuals who post material cited by people like John McDermott and the Experience Hendrix corporation and who actually quote source material. I never once said Trixie Sullivan had anything to do with the death of James Marshall Hendrix. I said that her statements on film about the Madison Square Garden concert are less than credible seen against other evidence.
There is still another version of the Madison Square Garden event worth mentioning. In his ‘Scuse Me While I Kiss the Sky, David Henderson gives a somewhat different version of the events.
Buddy Miles is quoted: “I personally witnessed Michael Jeffery give him [Jimi] two tabs of Purple Haze, acid, before we went on the stage at Madison Square Garden. Jimi, from the very start, was not himself. After that eighteen minutes, Jimi humped over, like he was gonna throw up. And then when he got up something scared him. He went off the stage. Michael Jeffery had a smile on his face. And I said, “Michael, you did what you set out to do, didn’t you?’ No comment.” (Henderson, 2008: 347).
Just when it looks especially damning, however, Henderson adds the following:
“But author Sharon Lawrence said Jimi told her it was Devon who gave him the bad acid. Whatever it was, it effectively severed his public connection to the anti-Viet Nam War movement.” (Ibid.)
Whether it was Michael Jeffery or Devon Wilson who undermined the Madison Square Garden concert (McDermott entertains the idea that it was a mix of LSD and alcohol), Henderson himself reiterates the allegations made by Buddy Miles regarding Jeffery’s overall disdain for the Band of Gypsys:
“Even before Woodstock in August of 1969, Jeffery had been dead set against Hendrix appearing with black sidemen, especially when all of them were black. He had made sure they were far to the back of the stage at Woodstock. He did not like the wild-haired African-named Juma, nor the addition of his congas to Hendrix’s sound. Jeffery marshaled a powerful argument against Hendrix going any further in the direction he had been going: Jimi had the lawsuit settlement to pay off and he had the Electric Lady Studios to pay for. They had little money coming in. Jimi could not take the chance of alienating people, and in Jeffery’s mind, Jimi had already alienated his fans quite a bit in the past year.” (Henderson: 348).
It remains entirely unclear how Jimi Hendrix wound up so out of it at the Madison Square Garden concert. McDermott doubts that Jeffery would have dosed Jimi. “It is highly improbable that his motive was to embarrass his meal ticket before a sold-out audience.” (McDermott, 1992: 250).
That said, McDermott does not fail to add the detail about the closing moment of that concert:
“As he would ‘Earth Blues’ down to an unscheduyled early close, Hendrix stepped to the microphone and vented a thinly veiled gibe at Michael Jeffery: ‘That’s what happens when earth f—s with space, never forget that.”
What does appear to be clear, however, is that Trixie Sullivan is incorrect in her statement that Michael Jeffery did not concern himself in the artistic aspects of Jimi’s music. On the contrary, he reminded Hendrix of his financial obligations in precisely a manner that forced Jimi to toe a specific line regarding the style of the music played, the particular people in the band, and their appearance … down to their complexion.
These are clearly aesthetic demands on the part of management, and no doubt Jimi Hendrix began to regard them as progressively more and more ham-fisted.
You presume to lecture me about integrity? Scott, you’re completely out of line… I’ve let this debate over Jimi’s death flow for years and have never censored any part of it. And I certainly don’t intend to start deleting anyone’s comments now either! That’s not how we play around here.
I have always appreciated Buster (and others) for posting carefully researched, thought-provoking content here as a resource for anyone that has questions about the official narrative of what happened to Jimi.
Do you think Buster has never been attacked for what he has posted? He doesn’t ask me to delete anyone’s comments though. Instead, he provides detailed rebuttals, which advance the discussion. THAT is how civilized people reach conclusions. To arrive at a truth often requires sifting through confusing, conflicting information that is, all too often, filled with intentional misdirection. Therefore, we are compelled to throw the entire disgusting, churning mass of truth, lies and fantasy onto the operating room table to be dissected and discussed by all… Opinions and statements should be able to stand on their own and should be able to withstand alternative arguments, trolling and even lies.
I don’t know anything about Ivana except that she has never asked me to block you. So, I’d say that right now she’s got more integrity than you.
I condemn your call for silencing a voice you don’t like, Scott. Individuals that are so eager to strip others of their voice disgust me. And you know what, if you do it again, I’m going to block YOU for calling on someone else’s voice to be silenced. It’ll be an opportunity for you to contemplate how much you like the experience.
Justin,
This is a well written article. Glad you gave people an opportunity to discuss Jimi’s death. Thanks for having the integrity not to silence people’s voices with censorship. Everybody should be able to present their thoughts and viewpoints without being silenced. This should be an outlet for everybody to give their viewpoint on their position. Censorship is for the weak individuals who don’t want other viewpoints being heard. Thanks for allowing people to express their viewpoint in a public setting. Freedom of speech should not be silenced. Thanks Justin.
It’s very clear that people like Scott Thompson, flyswatter, Buster don’t like to be challenged with an opposite viewpoint. They become angry and defensive calling for censorship, calling me a nazi, calling me a troll. That’s weak and pathetic. Obviously they have no confidence in their own position cuz they stoop that low to silence you and attack your character. Perhaps they should develop a better argument instead of trying to silence the ones who have a better one.
I’m just a bystander, reqding this incredibile discussion about Jimi. This may well be the most epic thread ever in the long run on this subject anywhere on the internet. Why spoil it by turning iinto a flame war Scott ? Buster doesn’t go down that route. I can persoanly vouch for Justin, been corresponding with him on and off for years. Show a bit of respect for the man, Scott. He’s well travelled and learned!
I hope we can all go back to our neutral corners and let the bout resume…While I do not offer any criticism of Justin because he is our host and we owe our ability to conduct this conversation to him, I have to defend Scott…Scott is the on-air radio host of San Francisco’s KPOO…I did a show with him on Jimi’s death in the summer 2016…Let me just inject that Scott’s frustration comes from his scholarly approach and his expectation that these threads will lead to a progress of points that have to be respected…The history of this is I was insulted and banned from the 2 main Hendrix venues “Crosstown Torrents” and Facebook’s “Electric Guru” when I tried to post what I am posting here…So while Justin extends free speech to those who deny Jimi’s murder they do not return the favor and their justification of the gross censorship they applied to myself and my world-leading information was quite moronic…They were basically saying the Hendrix internet was only for air-headed fans who wanted fun and a serious subject of great importance to Jimi and his history wasn’t welcomed…They saw the subject as being more for mocking and ridicule than serious concern…This website is one of the few corners of the internet where it isn’t automatically banned…Those feel-good morons who celebrated my unceremonious booting do not show up here because they are not serious entities…They are however in control…May I express that that is where Scott is almost certainly coming from so I sympathize with his frustration while also extending to Justin my appreciation for this preciously-endangered space…The only other battleground was a “Skeptoid” article comments section that has since had its 10 years-worth of comments deleted in order to leave the utterly useless skepticism of the murder evidence the article offers the only remaining thing…Our comments, like the comments in this article, had shown the original Skeptoid article to be ridiculous and opposite to the real facts…If it wasn’t for us the prevailing doubt and credulous material Ivana offers would be the only unchallenged viewpoint…
So in my defense of Scott, that is in no way meant to be a criticism of Justin and his generous hosting, Jason and Ivana’s content is condemningly disingenuous and in contempt of the reasonably-proven facts…It noticeably avoids recognizing or responding to the facts we’ve proven and asks us to take persons who are obviously deliberately avoiding the evidence as equal partners having an equal say…Both Jason and Ivana are obviously skimming the sites I was banned from for their worst murder denial material and presenting it straight without making any effort to respond to the evidentiary value of what we are showing or how it progresses an understanding of the events…
What persons like myself, Scott, and Flyswatter are doing is making a case for murder and doing it on a court-room basis…That basis includes the expectation that a judge would look at all the input and consider its evidentiary value…Therefore when we show evidence that refutes and makes moot the previous denial arguments Jason and Ivana present we find it frustrating that they can contemptuously respond with material that has obviously been invalidated by what we have more than reasonably shown…It is extremely frustrating when you present brilliant evidence that advances the knowledge of the subject to a serious degree and then see a person whose game is obviously taunting denial allowed equal access…In a court of law those who offered such contemptuous dishonesty would be reprimanded by the judge and forced to obey the best facts…On the internet they are allowed to get away with it despite the pernicious intent of what they write…There’s a fine line between Devil’s advocate and crass denier…I think that line has been objectively crossed by certain participants and at some point those who offer the best material have a right to a certain amount of respect…As do persons like Dr Bannister and Albert Allen, both of whom I know personally and can assure anyone that they are telling the truth and I would bet my reputation on it…It is painful to me to see persons who I know are not credible and are not offering genuine input to slander both those gentlemen without recourse or being made to account for it…Not to mention the main suggestion from Jason and Ivana is that I am some kind of a nut who is lying, presenting fraudulent sources, and distorting the true record…Jimi Hendrix is a very serious thing to me that I approach with great reverence and respect…Because of that I am very careful how I conduct myself and how I possibly affect Hendrix and his history…My reverence for Jimi and his significance is why I am making this effort in the first place…Just this morning a radio show in the New York City area broadcast an interview I did on Jimi’s murder to a 3 million person audience…
In summation, the way to look at Jason and Ivana is the ill-considered gratuitous doubt they offer is what spurred persons like Scott, Flyswatter, and myself to develop the evidence further and led to the tighter case we are showing here…So even though they are doing something extremely wrong and detrimental to Jimi it has led to the side-effect of further research and tightening of the case…So we’ll just have to rest in the assurance that the smarter credible readers will see Jason and Ivana are not credible entities and that their noticeable failure to credibly answer our good evidence is the indirect victory it is…They’ll know that our evidence has won the case and that the best effort of those in denial failed to show otherwise…No reasonable person could ever see those two as being seriously interested in the real evidence…
BUSTER says:Jason and Ivana’s content is condemningly disingenuous and in contempt of the reasonably-proven facts…It noticeably avoids recognizing or responding to the facts we’ve proven and asks us to take persons who are obviously deliberately avoiding the evidence as equal partners having an equal say.
Sorry Buster, you haven’t proven any facts. The only thing you post are made up make believe stories coming from dubious sources who all have been proven to be liars. You dabble in conspiracy theories with not one solid piece of evidence have you ever provided when asked for it. All the facts I’ve posted refute your claims. I choose not to believe unconfirmed quotes, wild innuendos and scenarios, and your made up assumptions until you show real solid evidence.
BUSTER says: Therefore when we show evidence that refutes and makes moot the previous denial arguments Jason and Ivana present we find it frustrating that they can contemptuously respond with material that has obviously been invalidated by what we have more than reasonably shown…It is extremely frustrating when you present brilliant evidence that advances the knowledge of the subject to a serious degree and then see a person whose game is obviously taunting denial allowed equal access.
LOL. You haven’t posted any “brilliant evidence”. You posted a phony claim by Tappy Wright that has been debunked that you don’t even fully believe. You posted claims by Doctor Bannister of “massive gallons of wine” and he has no documented recorded evidence of it or proof it existed. He claim he “dumped it out”. No rational person is going to believe that garbage unless you have proof.
BUSTER says: In a court of law those who offered such contemptuous dishonesty would be reprimanded by the judge and forced to obey the best facts.
Yes, you would be scolded by a judge trying to use debunked claims from Tappy Wright and Doctor Bannister as your “evidence”.
BUSTER says:Not to mention the main suggestion from Jason and Ivana is that I am some kind of a nut who is lying, presenting fraudulent sources, and distorting the true record.
Well, post some actual proof of the evidence of wine and I will change my mind. Every source you posted turns out to be a liar and embellishes the truth. Tappy Wright, Bannister, and Lawrence all have lied and are frauds.
BUSTER says: So even though they are doing something extremely wrong and detrimental to Jimi it has led to the side-effect of further research and tightening of the case…So we’ll just have to rest in the assurance that the smarter credible readers will see Jason and Ivana are not credible entities and that their noticeable failure to credibly answer our good evidence is the indirect victory it is…They’ll know that our evidence has won the case and that the best effort of those in denial failed to show otherwise…No reasonable person could ever see those two as being seriously interested in the real evidence
There is nothing “wrong” with not believing a phony conspiracy theory, especially one when it has all been debunked from top to bottom. You have no evidence except quotes from unreliable sources. I’ve asked you to post solid evidence several times an you refuse. All you post are character attacks and the same debunked quotes and theories over and over. That is not my fault that you are unable to use real evidence to prove your case.
Thank you Justin. I think some people do not like to be challenged on their views.
Yeah… well it just so happens when Justin was speaking of “conflicting information that is, all too often, filled with intentional misdirection”, he was speaking of YOU.
And where Buster and I are concerned, you have been NO challenge, as evidenced by the whole slew of questions put to you directly that you haven’t been able to answer directly, in addition to the whole slew of germane points that you can’t answer directly or refute. That right there automatically puts you on the losing side of your so-called “challenge”.
Yes, indeed, Justin, many thanks for that awesome burst of self-righteous dyspepsia. It arouses me to no end to be lectured by your savoir faire. And I loved the way you purposely misunderstood and twisted my words so that you could pat yourself on the back about what a generous guy you are to host such a nifty site. The problem is that you completely misrepresented what I said. I was not suggesting, nor will I ever suggest that any person on this thread ever be refused their right to post anything. Nor do I need your idiotic reiteration of what the site is about since I began posting on it ten years ago.
Whatever actually happened to cause Jimi Hendrix to leave us before we were ready for him to go, the fact remains that the music is still entirely alive and kicking. And as my fingers dance across this keyboard, a lovely acoustic version of “Hear My Train a-Coming” is spinning in new 33 1/3-inch vinyl on my turn-table, and I’m looking at the new 6-LP box set of ELECTRIC LADYLAND six feet from me.
The music is still alive fifty years after Jimi stopped fingering the frets, but the remaining frets that foul play was involved in his demise also are just as resonant as they were the day he died.
The fact that Gary Jucha’s fairly recent book of frequently asked questions on Jimi Hendrix (2013) contains an interesting chapter on Jimi’s mysterious death indicates the growing awareness that it was, indeed, mysterious. And the fact that Jucha concludes that it deserves deeper investigation also indicates that the discussion will not easily be put to rest by people who set up websites with names like “Jimi Hendrix Murdered?” so they can liken the theme to the X-Files.
There are always other places to go when the gatekeepers double down on closing the universe of discourse.
Scott,
I’m disappointed in you. The inherent pettiness in your latest comment barely merits a response… If I were in your shoes, I would have apologized for what seems to have been an emotional outburst and stopped this negativity.
You, however, doubled down and only made yourself appear childish and, even worse, cowardly.
There isn’t a person on this planet (if they’re being honest) that would have read what you wrote in your original comment – when you encouraged me to muzzle Ivana – any differently than I did. You can try to backpedal all you want in an effort to make yourself look less ignoble, but your original meaning remains clear.
“…by allowing this provocateur named Ivana to slander individuals who post material…”
So, I should not allow her? As you well know, the only way I could do that is to block her or to edit what she wrote. In other words, to silence her.
It is you that has sought to silence the discourse here, Scott. Only you.
Oh, and since you’re complaining about slander, it is amusing that you slandered me in that same sentence I quoted you on. As I have stayed completely out of this discussion, there was no reason for you to go personal and start taking shots at me just because you were frustrated with Ivana. That’s equivalent to the guy that goes home and kicks the poor dog because he had a bad day at work.
Flyswatter, are we reading the same books because that is where I am getting this information from? Or are these authors all intentionally misleading or offering conflicting information? It is obvious that I have hit a nerve where some of you are concerned but this is what forums are all about. We need diverse information to get to the truth. So far, unfortunately, I have not learned anything new or had my opinion changed by most things posted here. What I have taken from this website is the willingness of some to manipulate the truth and the gullibility of others who take whatever is offered without question.
Not a question of what books we are reading. It’s a question of you being blatantly illiterate on your end. That fact that say you haven’t learned anything new speaks volumes right there. I’m quite certain that you didn’t know anything about Albert Allen’s witnessing until it was pointed out here
My opinions are just that nothing more nothing less. I did not mean to slander anyone. People are entitled to their own opinions as diverse as they may be. I thought this was meant to be a forum for people to give their opinions and I thought I would add to the discussion. I did not realise this would cause the tension that it has this was never my intention. Please don’t take this so seriously it is not meant to be. Thank you to Justin but I think it might be best if I no longer post on this forum. I think it suits like minded people best.
Ivana pretends to be the victim of biased commentors who is only offering “diverse opinions” but anyone who is schooled in this subject can see she is only referencing sources that cast doubt on the murder evidence while blatantly ignoring most of the credible evidence that overturns her material…Flyswatter and myself are well-versed in the sources Ivana is referencing…They are sources that either did not bother to look for the evidence we present or deliberately avoided it…Anyone who is well knowledged in the subject will know that Ivana’s points are regressive to what we are showing and represent claims that have been overturned by our evidence…Again, if this were a court room the judge would look at what we present and say that it had already refuted what Ivana counters with…So Ivana’s pretending that she is simply offering her opinion dishonestly ignores the fact the better evidence we offer makes all of what she offers moot and unsubmittable…Ivana applies no critical thinking to what she posts or its context…Just the fact she read it somewhere makes it a valid “opinion” and counter evidence despite the huge qualifications we have explained regarding what she posts and its true context…This is the big leagues Ivana and you can’t do that…It doesn’t matter if you lack the skill or educated background…
You called us restricters of broader information and manipulators of the gullible…The fact you don’t have any sense of how badly that is misapplied, considering the amount of abuse and information restriction that comes from the official side, says all anyone needs to know about you…If you had any credible sense of the subject you would realize we are the combators of the real restriction and manipulation of the gullible who don’t question information…Your input is painfully backwards and superficial…It attacks the good guys in favor of the liars and evidence-avoiders…The worst offense you commit is you claim you haven’t learned anything from this site or seen anything that would change your opinion while anyone can see you ignored the most important proof you called for…The real truth is this comments section contains probably the best information on the internet that has radically advanced the true understanding of what happened to Jimi and vitiated the official story…Your innocent act of only offering an opinion while making vicious accusations against our credibility isn’t acceptable Ivana…Either make your accusations and back them up or follow your own advice and quit because of your admitted lack of qualification…
It is a lie to say nothing new was learned from this comments section…I happen to know that my forensic arguments are unique and offer proof Jimi was murdered at an official legal medical level…Several of us have noticed that you never once attempted to answer my forensic arguments as well as other damning evidence…And you can’t answer them by ruminating over irrelevant denial quotes…That’s going backwards and moving away from the relevant material without ever directly addressing it…We can prove Jimi was murdered Ivana…We are just waiting for you to actually answer what we posted instead of evading it with the irrelevant denial quotes you respond with…Please, practice what you preach and commit to a specific and detailed scenario of how you think Jimi died…Since you are so demanding of evidence, that is a double-edged sword and applies to you as well…So please spell-out how you think Jimi died and connect it to a firm timeline…I’ll prove to you that it can be disproven by the real evidence you are ignoring…You fail to realize, Ivana, that this isn’t about opinions, it’s about facts and if you are going to step on the toes of the best in the business you’re going to have to answer them…For the life of me I can’t understand how anyone could look at what we’ve posted here and decide to take the side of darkness against Jimi and his murder…
Buster the whole premise of this website is the suggestion that Jimi was murdered. I am not making accusations of murder you are. It has been established that Tappy was lying about the murder of Jimi Hendrix by Michael Jeffrey since MJ was in Spain confirmed by two people. This is the foundation of your argument/evidence. Please then tell me who the murderer is. Eric Burdon, Alvenia Bridges, Eric Barrett, Gerry Stickells and Terry Slater were all at Monika’s flat that morning why then did they not bother to question her about the copious amounts of red wine oozing from Jimi? The coroners report states that Jimi died from inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication not the red wine. The red wine scenario is added years later. To further add fuel to the fire we have the Aleem twins startling revelation decades later. Why did they not speak up before or indeed during Kathy’s investigation? I have a real problem with people who speak up decades later about the supposed murder of Jimi when most of the people who were closest to Jimi have passed away and cannot defend themselves. This then gives rise to speculation, gossip, hearsay, innuendo, distortion of the truth and downright lies.
And like Buster said, Ivana keeps cuckoo-birding the same regurgitated bunk that has already been answered and debunked countless times.
Ivana’s just yanking her own chain, because there is no way anybody can pretend to have missed the answers to her questions as many times as she pretends to have done.
No Ivana…You can’t get away with that…Like the deniers who run the websites you are sourcing from, you ignore everything that is written and try to get away with repeating Bob Levine’s claim that Tappy admitted it was all bullshit as the one and only piece of evidence in all this…You can’t get away with that because you are violating the rules of evidence you pretend to be promoting…You are not telling the truth when you try to put words in my mouth and say Levine’s claim is the basis of my argument…You wish it was the basis of my argument but the truth is it is the basis of YOUR argument and it isn’t good enough…As I have already posted and you chose to ignore, Tappy is a much more complex person with a much deeper background than you acknowledge…I discussed that background extensively with Tappy in phone calls…You are also ignoring that Bob Levine was a man with a background with Jeffery that involved mafia loans and other dubious business…Both Tappy and Bob were persons who did not want to reveal their true background or doings so any knee-jerk denials from them can’t be taken at pre-emptive face value like you try to force while ignoring any greater evaluation of them and their total background or motives…You can’t get away with ignoring that when Bob was first asked his opinion on this in the 1990 interviews for ‘Setting The Record Straight’ he pointed serious suspicions of guilt towards Michael Jeffery…You are a highly dishonest person Ivana…I have notified you of this true background on Levine and you have ignored it each and every time in order to return to your grossly over-simplified grasping on Levine’s denial…There is much more to both men and their witnessings than you allow…Your sole source is an out of context, under-investigated quote from an article where the reporter made no effort to seek out the greater facts…In no way has it been established that Tappy was lying about Jeffery’s confession…And if he was it was only because he couldn’t tell the real way he learned about it because it was too revealing of Tappy and his true alliances at the time, or it was too dangerous…Your level of detective work is very poor…
The wine was not oozing from Jimi when those Jeffery employees were there…It was corked-in by dried vomit that the ambulance attendants said they couldn’t penetrate…It is very obvious to anyone who isn’t trying to force denial that the reason those Jeffery employees didn’t question Monika is because she told them Jimi had been murdered and all those employees knew the reason why…Monika had witnessed Jimi firing Jeffery…Only a fool would not realize she had obviously told them and, as Jeffery employees, they already knew of Jimi’s desire to fire Jeffery…You are quite naive if you don’t ask yourself why those Jeffery employees never gave interviews or said a word about it from that day on…They knew from the first moment and that is why they did a 5 hour clean-up with Jimi’s dead body on the bed…This isn’t rocket science and there are things I can’t tell you that prove it even further…
You’re just repeating the same denier bullshit Ivana…I asked you to please spell-out a detailed description of how Jimi died and connect it to a firm timeline…You refused to do it and by doing that you forfeit and concede the debate…All you are telling people is you refuse to go in to those details because you know you won’t last long and you’ll be refuted…You are telling people that all you have is that out of context partial information that you are running to in desperation as an escape from our better evidence…You are violating the rules of evidence because we have shown adequate reference to the wine being witnessed at the time by the Chief Coroner…We have also shown that Albert Allen witnessed the Samarkand photos long before Monika made them public, which proves his witnessing was real…You’re not being honest here…Dr Bannister was not asked about the wine until a false accusation of malpractice for not doing tracheostomy was made against him by Monika in 1990…What counts the most here is I asked you why Scotland Yard never interviewed Dr Bannister or asked him about the wine?…Why did they never seek-out the nurses?…These are the questions that count the most and you have failed to answer them every time I ask them…You also totally ignored that we have caught the second doctor, Dr Siefert, in a direct lie where he said on video that Jimi was covered in wine but then said he detected no alcohol on Jimi…You apparently pose yourself as a strict critic of witnessing but you ignore these pure examples of guilt and seem to have no objections over them…
Sorry Ivana but you are violating the rules of evidence and cannot answer direct evidence like this by once again referring to your bogus self-referencing cycle of denial claims taken from your denial websites…It doesn’t work that way and you must answer these things honestly and directly…If you don’t you are only telling people you can’t admit their credibility…As long as you contemptuously avoid committing to a clearly-described scenario of how Jimi died and attach it to a firm timeline you lose…You have to be able to do that at this stage of the game and not doing so is a concession of the debate at a court room level…
Buster please answer the question I have asked you. Who murdered Jimi Hendrix? You are making this accusation so please answer it. Please no long winded answers.
Ivana is absolutely correct. Buster and Flyswatter only rely on reading conspiracy books for their “evidence”. Those are only designed to sell books for money. Not to tell the truth. They will believe any false claim as long as it works for their phony murder conspiracy. Even when their false stories are debunked like Tappy Wright’s they still try to use it or add a new conspiracy on that. That’s pathetic.
Not a single doctor was recorded speaking or documenting anything about wine in Hendrix’s lungs in 1970. Not one word of it. Not in any official reports either. They had access to every person in the media asking them questions. They said nothing.
They said nothing in the 70’s or 80’s either. Only when Doctor Bannister read Electric Gypsy and thought he was going to be sued of malpractice did this wine claim come about. Then all these fake wine stories were written in all these fake books to make money. All these phony wine claims were proven false.
Looks like Buster can’t answer a simple question that Ivana asks him. Buster writes another looooong useless post of nothing instead of answering a simple question.
Buster claims Hendrix was murdered. So why can’t Buster answer a simple question? Isn’t Buster “the self proclaimed foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix? He should know the answer. I would like to know it too. Who murdered Hendrix Buster? No long rants. Just answer it since you’ve made the murder claim.
Sorry Buster, you have no forensic argument. You don’t even know what the term “forensic” means.
Using Bannister’s fake claim of “5 bottles of wine inside Hendrix” as you match up the blood alcohol numbers on Jimi’s autopsy report is not “forensics”. Everybody should be laughing their heads off at that.
Forensics are the actual samples of physical evidence.
Where is all the wine that Bannister claimed to have seen that day? Where did it go?
There was no “hardened corked vomit” in Hendrix that oozed wine after. Nice try. That could never happen. Boy, you sure love to tell phony made up tails to spin your b.s. murder theory.
So again we have “off the record claims” by Buster for his “so called evidence”. Totally laughable.
There you go again Buster trying to defend Tappy Wright who lied about Michael Jeffery. Jeffery was in Spain. Confirmed by two sources. You need to defend Tappy Wright cuz if you don’t that eliminates your main suspect Jeffery. Without Wright’s phony claim you have no case. You still don’t have a case cuz Jeffery had no motive to kill Hendrix and he was in Spain.
There was no “corked in vomit” as you’re trying to claim. There was no “corked in vomit” at the flat that oozed red wine later at the hospital. More made up stuff.
Monika never witnessed Jimi firing Jeffery. Where did you get that from?
The chief coroner Gavin Thurston never saw any wine cuz he never described wine in the final autopsy report. Thurston stated “barbiturates” just like Bannister said in his press release to the media on 9/18/70.
You would be laughed at of a court room with your non existent evidence and only made up quotes and stories you use.
Troll Buster aka Flyswatter posting more ignorance.
Very interesting what Buddy Miles told his new bass player that he hired in 1970 to help him finish recording his album “Them Changes”. A man by the name of Jack DiGiovanni (who personally knew both Buddy Miles and Mike Jeffery) has told me directly that Buddy’s story about Jeffery dosing Jimi with bad acid at the BOG Madison Square Garden is 100% correct & Jack also said that from day Jimi died until the day Buddy died, that Buddy believed Jimi had been murdered.
Flyswatter Jimi said in a few interviews he thought he would not live to 28 also adding that the next time he visited Seattle would be in pine box.
Hey Ivana. Well, no joke, Captain Obvious. That was months later on from when Buddy Miles told that to David Hull.
So what’s your point? You make none, whatsoever.
Never does it dawn on ill-informed Ivana that Jimi was telling that to people because he had been trying to sever himself from Jeffery and Jeffery had made threats…Jimi knew what was happening around him with the kidnapping and other dirty moves like the heroin bust and knew he was in danger…That is the correct context of what he told Chuck Wein in that quote…God forbid Ivana would ever see it for what it was…
That is exactly right, Buster. And just look down and she’s asking “who murdered Jimi” without realizing that this flying roughshod in the face of the fact that she’s been asked a whole slew of questions that she’s failed to answer.
I say it’s time to just ignore her & not respond directly to her and let her find her own answers to her stupid questions.
Just what I suspected putting it back onto me. I do not need to answer anything as I am not the one making accusations of murder you are. Your claims are invalid if you do not answer this question. I will be asking it until you supply that name. I am sure you do not want to appear as a group of pranksters and tricksters or is it that you do not know the answer. I will, like you suggested, answer it for you. There was no murder. That’s right Jeffrey was in Spain and Jimi tried to phone him there and Michael was upset that he missed Jimi’s call. Trixie Sullivan had said that they were going to fly over to Spain and meet up at Jeffrey’s club Sgt Pepper at his request or is this just myth and fantasy by a deluded Trixie Sullivan. Wright admitted he made the whole thing up and so why are still holding on to something that has been exposed as a lie? I will answer it for you no other place to go with your assumption since you have been banned and panned from Crosstown Torrents and Electric Guru. It is time to let go of this nonsense Buster, Flyswatter and Scott. Jimi died in 1970 and most of his personnel are dead as well.
Buster I asked you answer a question. Who murdered Jimi Hendrix? You are making accusations of murder so please answer it. I want the name. It’s funny that we are reading the same books and getting two different perspectives or it is that I am the one seeing things for what they really are? You work this one out Buster. I think you get the gist of what I mean. Don’t forget to answer the question who murdered Jimi Hendrix?
(Greetings! Welcome to this 3 Part Series where I debunk this “imbibed wine” fairy tale that conspiracy theorists use for their phony Hendrix Murder claim. These conspiracy theorists loosely throw around names and quotes that most people have no idea about. They try to sound credible using doctors and quotes. But as you are about to read it is only phony b.s. that is easily debunked.)
“Debunking The Phony ‘Imbibed Wine’ Hendrix Myth And Why It’s A Joke”
Part One
By Jason
The tin foil hatters religiously use the wine myth for their fake Hendrix Murder conspiracy. Anything that mentions wine they use to sell their myth. Fraud sources and debunked stories are no problem for them. They use it anyway and create a new story behind it to keep the conspiracy going.
They profusely defend frauds like Tappy Wright and Doctor Bannister since they give support to their fake murder myth. The tin foil hatters know they are on shaky ground with these two phonies so they use another myth to try and seal the deal. Cue the “imbibed wine” myth as they trot out Dr. Gavin Thurston as their safe bet to convince the world of a Hendrix murder.
The tin foil hatters use Thurston as their final piece of the puzzle to convince the public their theory is legit. Thurston and the “imbibed wine” myth is what the tin foil hatters claim for their “forensics” and their ultimate claim of a Hendrix murder. But as you are about to see this “imbibed wine” claim is more phony than a 3 dollar bill.
The first thing you need to know is that this “imbibed wine” story was described by Sharon Lawrence who added this little passage in her book in 2001. Sharon states that Jack Meehan, a UPI correspondent, spoke with Dr. Gavin Thurston in 1970 after the Hendrix autopsy was performed. Sharon said that Thurston told Jack Meehan that Hendrix was “fairly imbibed with wine”. Then Meehan only told Lawrence about this story and nobody else. Tin foil hatters use that quote as their evidence of a Hendrix murder. They use that quote to claim Bannister was credible with his phony story of Hendrix’s lungs filled with wine.
Lawrence’s book was already riddled with made up quotes and errors. She claimed Jimi was born at a family friend’s house which is false. Sharon made up a fake quote about Jimi’s mother and what she said to Jimi before she passed away. Lawrence needed a dramatic touch for the book so she made up fake stories to get the reader’s sympathy.
Sharon provides no documented evidence of a Meehan and Thurston meeting ever happening. We are only relying on her second hand quoted account of what a coroner supposedly told her colleague. We are relying on her to tell us this 1970 quote after she already made up several fake quotes in her book. And hilariously we have tin foil hatters yelling “slam dunk” based on a claimed second hand account from Lawrence that never even happened.
Are we to believe what she says after she has already lied before? Sharon committed felony perjury in a court of law in Toronto. Sharon auctioned off empty cigarette packs claiming they belonged to Hendrix from the 60’s to cash in on his name. From her past behavior she has proved herself to be a liar and a fraud. Printing false accounts of Hendrix in her book along with obvious made up quotes makes this woman not credible. After all that, we can say this woman is not a reliable source. Except the tin foil hatters give her great praise for peddling a phony quote that they use to claim their phony murder theory.
Sharon Lawrence was a UPI reporter in the 60’s and 70’s. Why didn’t she report this “imbibed wine” story then? Isn’t that what a reporter is supposed to do? Isn’t a reporter supposed to report important news? Wouldn’t “imbibed wine” be important to tell the world as a cause of death? She wouldn’t want to tell the world something major about Jimi Hendrix who was a friend? Doesn’t add up and the “imbibed wine” myth is starting to fall a part for the tin foil hatters.
Why would Sharon Lawrence “forget” about this important “imbibed wine” event from September 1970 and not think of it again until 2001 when she wrote her book? Because it never happened and she made the whole thing up in 2001, that’s why.
Why didn’t Sharon bring it up in the 90’s when Kathy Etchingham was doing her investigation? Sharon claims this “imbibed wine” story just “popped back” into her head again as she was writing her book. Of course it just popped. It popped into her head as she made it up with her other fake quotes in her book.
You can’t tell me that Sharon Lawrence who was a seasoned reporter and a friend of Jimi Hendrix would “forget” and then fail to report this major revelation of Jimi being “imbibed with wine” in the news. This story would have changed everything from Hendrix just being a drug casualty. Sharon didn’t report it because it never happened and she just made it up in 2001. Some good friend she turned out to be.
All these people who were associated with Hendrix never said a peep during the 70’s or 80’s about their “major stories”, did they? They all waited until the mid 90’s and into the 2000’s when everybody was writing a book. Each person outdid each other with a new “startling revelation” as a hook for their book so they could sell copies. These frauds and shysters are no friends of Hendrix who just used the man’s dead name to make money off him. Disgraceful.
Now I know the tin foil hatters reading this will be foaming at the mouth and screaming. They’ll be accusing me of trying just to discredit Lawrence as they call me a “troll”, “murder denier”, and all the other b.s. they use as a defense. I have more to discredit their phony “imbibed wine” myth with and that will be in Part 2. I’m just digging in with more to come. So enjoy some more of this phony “imbibed wine” debunking coming up in Part 2.
As to Jason, there’s an old adage “If it looks, feels, and smells like an obnoxious troll it probably is”…
It is painfully obvious that Jason is an internet troll who is desperately trying to use cheap defamation to discredit witnesses who he knows are important to the murder evidence…It is what weaseling defense lawyers do when they know their client is guilty…Jason’s smear tactics are so obviously cheap and dishonest that he saves you the time of answering them point for dishonest point…You can simply point out the obvious form of his denial trolling and see that he is obviously trying too hard to discredit persons he unconsciously knows are legitimate witnesses…
Sharon Lawrence was Jimi’s friend and was in London the night Jimi was murdered because she went there after breaking off from a tour with the Rolling Stones after hearing Jimi was in trouble…She was a professional rock reporter and was on the job…Jack Meehan worked for the same United Press International and was in London at the time…On September 29th Meehan went and interviewed The London Coroner’s Office Chief Gavin Thurston over Jimi’s death…As much as Jason would like us to let him lead us with his denial in a wholly dishonest narrative, the fact Sharon posted a date for the interview shows recorded knowledge of it and therefore its realness…Jason is just a scummy internet troll who thinks he’s clever but his stuff disintegrates in your hands with the slightest touch because it is spun in the infernal feeble mills of make it up as you go along denial and is the faulty fabric of its origins…For Sharon to have a precise date almost certainly means she kept a record of the event because she was a reporter…Jason wants us to drop our minds and intelligence and listen to his idiotic trolling…Like I said, if lying Jason went and actually confronted Sharon Lawrence I’m sure she would quickly provide proof of Meehan’s interview…And if he dared call her a liar to her face she would most certainly rip Jason a most enjoyable new one in public and put him in his deserved place…Just because Sharon didn’t report it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen…You are a very poor detective Jason with very dull limited one track thinking…
Exactly, both Jason and Ivana are a pair of lying-denying pigbreeders that wallow in their own pigshit mire of denial of reality. All they do is pull fabrications out of their asses repeatedly & oink out the same denials over & over again, and accuse others of that which they are guilty of.
More weak character attacks from Buster with no proof or evidence. All he can weakly say is I’m a “troll” and nothing more while denying the facts. I’ve posted the facts. You have not.
Everything I wrote about Sharon Lawrence are facts and can easily be checked. That is not character defamation.
If “imbibed wine” was so important Sharon Lawrence would have reported it herself in 1970 and not wait 31 years to add it in a book.
Funny how Buster protects Sharon Lawrence on this web page but gave her book a 1 star review on Amazon posting under the handle of “Ralph Yates”. What is your agenda Buster?
Buster and Flyswatter both proved me right. Look at the last paragraph I wrote above. They have no evidence to refute what I said. Only cheap character attacks cuz they don’t like hearing the truth. Pathetic.
Welcome back Jason. I’ve been over at Crosstown Torrents reading some of their comments. I came across someone called Scrum Drum who sounds eerily like Buster’s long winded rants. I know that Buster was banned from this site and Scrum Drum has the word banned written under his name. I have the feeling they are the same person. He is good at hiding his true identity as I assume “Buster” is also a pseudonym. So much truth in your last comment.
Hi Ivana,
Thanks, it is the truth and it’s why Buster and Flyswatter are in meltdown mode. That’s very interesting. I’ll have to check out that site and read the comments.
Still waiting for you answer to my question Buster. Who murdered Jimi Hendrix? Flyswatter that is a scarf around Jimi’s neck and the reason he was still wearing it was because he was found fully clothed on top of bed covered in vomit dead from the high dosage of Vesparax in his system. Jimi choked on his own vomit. The sleeping pills suppressing his coughing reflex. This is well established.
I’ll give you credit Ivana…You’ve got a healthy set of balls for a woman…You’re not being honest because anyone can read the responses and see my points that you evaded, and have the arrogance to think you have the right to ignore, forced you to do that hail mary pass you threw in response…If you think that people don’t see you as the clueless internet troll you are who admits that she is just learning of this for the first time from reading Crosstown Torrents, then you’re living in your own delusion…I am a person who knew and befriended Tappy Wright and Bob Levine for several years…You are a person who reads an article by a hit piece reporter who was only seeking to discredit Tappy, and possibly doing it for an unknown agency, and you immediately try to force that over everything while deliberately ignoring a much more subtly-accurate version of the events as I learned of them from the actual participants…Ivana, you can troll that one quote for the rest of your life, it still isn’t going to change the true interpretation I got from Tappy and Bob in person from knowing them…Nor does your regressive and dishonest use of that one liner quote serve as justification for your ignoring Bob’s true context via his original 1990 ‘Setting The Record Straight’ comments where he openly pointed fingers at Jeffery…If you ignore this true record of Bob then I’m going to ignore you…You get sloppier and more primitive (dishonest) according to the amount of evidence you’re ignoring…If you think you own this conversation or are in charge of the debate by ignoring everything and just repeating that refuted simplistic shit you post you’re stupid because wiser minds can see all the legitimate evidence you’re ignoring…Denial trolls always have to be aggressively in control of the narrative, otherwise it would be too clear they are ignoring good evidence and not giving adequate response…It is painfully apparent that Ivana is a clueless troll who thinks she can block out the best version of the events ever presented by means of repeating a simplistic denial dialogue she picked-up by skimming the internet…She’s not really interested in the truth and it is obvious she’s going to respond to anything she sees with this rotten denial…
I have already beaten Ivana because, no matter her claims to the contrary, she does have to answer certain facts…Ivana forfeited this debate when she refused to post and commit to a definite scenario of the events that is connected to a precise and firm timeline…I suspect she won’t do that for 2 reasons…This first is that she doesn’t know enough about the subject she is recklessly denying and doesn’t want to admit she can’t produce such a timeline because of her lack of knowledge or qualification…The second is because she knows that as soon as she makes those commitments she’s going to be outside her simple-minded denial script and will be quickly shredded by the real facts…Sorry Ivana but your self-excuses aren’t working and they aren’t fooling anyone…You lost on that count alone…
In 1975 Monika went to Caesar Glebbeek’s Amsterdam radio show and said: “Jimi was murdered by the mafia for sure” on the air…If it was “established” that Jimi died of a drug overdose and choked on his own vomit, why in the world would Monika say something like that?…Tell me Ivana…How much is moronically repeating “Tappy admitted it was all bullshit” over and over going to get you in ignoring Monika’s comment and its more than obvious implications?…Nice try but you haven’t put a scratch on this short of your stupid contempt…
Buster she was covering her tracks about her actions that morning putting the blame onto others. Pure and simple. Here we go again about the mafia story so it’s the Mafia now not Michael Jeffrey who murdered Jimi. I’ve got to hand it to you Buster the way you try to make others look incredulous with your debunked ramblings is a common ploy designed to make you look like the authority. I did’nt realise this was a race with the use of the word “beaten”. And by the way look at all the others who Monika blamed for their actions that morning contributing to Jimi’s death. The nonsense you believe in Buster and the myths you still try to hang onto make you look like the loser in all of this.
You’re doing it again Ivana…You’re retreating in to pure trolling blather in order to evade answering information…You’re just a flat out trolling denier with a denial agenda…You have no intention what so ever of honestly or objectively considering the facts…
What you wrote above doesn’t make sense…By 1975 Monika had succeeded in escaping scrutiny and had gotten away with it…She didn’t need to cover her tracks, she had already gotten away with it…Your answer doesn’t make sense because going and saying over the air to a huge audience that Jimi was murdered doesn’t serve to cover her tracks…It does just the opposite and opens up serious new questions that she’ll have to answer…What you write doesn’t make logical sense…You speak as if you are instructing through informed skepticism but your material shows a serious lack of critical thinking to the point of moronic disqualification…So, like usual, you haven’t answered the point…Your point about switching from Michael Jeffery to the mafia is idiotic and is being used to evade the point you still haven’t credibly answered…You are failing to realize that at the time of that 1975 interview Monika didn’t need to put the blame on others…No one was blaming her at that point…She didn’t need to cover her tracks because there were no tracks to be covered at that time…So you still haven’t answered the point of why would Monika risk bringing serious attention to herself by claiming the mafia murdered Jimi?…
You haven’t debunked anything I’ve written…You are obviously uncredible, as can be discerned by the way you answer direct points (or don’t answer) with content-less trash-talk that isn’t connected to any of the points that are being made…You lost this debate by being repeatedly unable to answer my challenge to you to commit to a specific scenario and timeline…You’re not fooling anyone Ivana…You’re not doing that because you have no knowledge of what you are talking about and can’t do it…And your trolling responses don’t serve as adequate substitute…
Jason, have you read the latest offerings from Buster and Flyswatter LOL and I’m still laughing. I thought Monika was supposed to have been in on the murder of Jimi along with Jeffrey but now Buster sides with Monika and he accuses the Mafia. Talk about back-pedalling. Of course this also puts into question everything else that Buster holds true. Tappy Wright, Bob Levine, the Aleem twins stories. This only re-inforces that everything Buster has written is nonsense. Buster has stated he befriended Wright and Levine both of whom later denied the murder scenario. Congratulations to Buster. I’m looking forward to reading your next post Jason and further debunking what Buster, Flyswatter and Scott put out there.
Don’t run to your trolling partner Ivana…Answer what’s being written…You’re a liar and you offer a moronic level of discourse…Anyone can read what I wrote and see in no way did I accuse the mafia…What I did do is ask you to please respond to why Monika would say in public on the air in 1975 that the “mafia murdered Jimi for sure”?…Ivana is not honest and she has been avoiding giving an answer to that simple question every time I ask it…Anyone can look at our last few interchanges and see Ivana is clearly seeking to evade the best evidence and she is answering it with what is basically idiotic trolling that gives away the bankruptcy and lack of qualification of her position…No one who honestly read what I wrote could say I was agreeing with and endorsing Monika’s accusation against the mafia…You’re dishonest Ivana and you’re a liar…You’re deliberately misrepresenting what I wrote in order to avoid answering it…What I did write was a request for Ivana to explain why Monika did that?…Ivana said she did it in order to place blame on others and cover her tracks…When I responded that Monika did not need to place blame, since no one was blaming her in 1975, and therefore did not need to cover her tracks, Ivana answered with the dishonest evasion you see here…Ivana is doing her best not to answer why Monika would go on the air and say the mafia murdered Jimi in 1975?…Ivana is the one who is back-pedaling and she is doing it by lying…What she is stupidly avoiding answering is that saying Jimi was murdered would only bring more scrutiny to her and her story…So it doesn’t make sense that she would be trying to cover her tracks with that claim when she had already gotten away with it…
Ivana’s material is cheap, shallow-minded, shows a serious stupid line of reasoning, answers very good questions with dumb answers that ham-handedly try to twist what was said in to stupid rationales…I agree with Flyswatter…Ivana is a lying troll who likes to reduce everything to the pig manure she prefers to dwell in in order to escape the good arguments as you can see her doing here…She’s a liar and knowing Bob Levine and Tappy Wright personally, both men went to their graves strongly believing Jimi was murdered, counter to the juvenile trolling teasing Ivana offers…
Ivana lost this debate when she refused to post a clear and concise scenario of how Jimi died and connect it to a specifically detailed timeline…She can’t and won’t do that because it requires her to come out of the trolling mud pit and deal in legitimate discussion…
Quite correct. These lying-denying pig-breeders (like Jason and Ivana & we should probably start calling Jason, ‘Porky’ and Ivana, ‘Petunia’ ) fail to recognize something very signifcant.
And that significant something is, if Jimi really had died accidently from choking on vomit as a result of barbitural overdose, then it would have been verified at that time by the doctors and ambulance men that attended to Jimi, with those same men being called to the initial Inquest to give testimony, and their identities would have been known to the public right from the get-go, instead of remaining unknown for over two decades (except for maybe Seifert, whose name was on one of the coroner’s forms) & there would have been no final decree of “Open Verdict”.
Logic tells us that if the above had happened, then those testimonies would have spread like wildfire & been printed in all the newspapers at that time.
But, such a thing NEVER HAPPENED & Porky lies when he says the doctors “had access to the media and said nothing”. That’s just Porky pulling a fabrication out of his anal cavity, as there is absolutely no record or documentation whatsoever that the attending doctors or ambulance men had any contact with the media, because it never happened & we know this because the media would have published it somewhere, if it had.
Standby for another round of Porky and Petunia oinking out their lying fantasies of denial with no substance to back it up.
Just as I predicted. Petunia is back with her vain noise saying nothing more than “oink, oink……..oink, oink, oink”
haha Tappy Wright went to his grave knowing he was a lying fraud who made up the Michael Jeffery story with wine and pills that you continue to sell.
Bob Levine said in several interviews that Jimi was never murdered including your pointless video.
Quit lying.
Flyswatter is either ignorant or just trying to cover for the phony “Hendrix Murder Myth”.
When a famous person dies tragically, the media has access to the doctors and the hospital so they can get the answers and report it to the public. This is standard procedure in the media. Flyswatter is ignorant of the protocol of the news business.
If Sharon Lawrence claimed that Jack Meehan had access to Dr. Gavin Thurston, then that means any person in the media had access to him and the doctors at St. Mary Abbot Hospital. They aren’t just going to grant access to only Jack Meehan and nobody else. That is why Sharon Lawrence’s claim is a total joke.
Doctor Bannister and Brown never stated anything about “wine” as Hendrix’s cause of death on 9/18/70. The official hospital statement reads ” He died of an overdose”. Bannister wrote the statement of Hendrix’s death and never included wine as a cause of death. Then in 1992 we have gallons of wine oozing out according to Bannister.
If there were bottles of wine in Hendrix’s lungs Bannister and Brown would have stated that to the press in 1970, he died of “being drowned by wine”. They never said that cuz it didn’t happen.
I read them Ivana and they are really ridiculous and shows they have nothing to offer except for lame insults. Hilarious stuff. They can’t use Jeffery as their main suspect since he was in Spain. So I guess now they need a new conspiracy to claim it was the mafia LOL. Did you see above where Buster accuses Dr. Teare of illegally forging autopsy numbers cuz Jeffery demanded it? So now it’s the mafia who did it and Teare, Monika, and Jeffery in on this wine plot all together. The conspiracy continues….LOL
Buster this has become tit for tat. If you want the truth I am not interested in what you write at all as it is all regurgitated nonsense. Still holding on to Wright and Levine. That says it all for me. You are the one making yourself look like a liar by repeating the same scenario over and over again. Remember that Caesar Glebbeek was a supporter of Monika inviting her to speak on radio. This is where she made the claim of murder by the Mafia. Everything Monika said about that morning has been discredited so taking that murder claim as factual is ludicrous. Monika drew attention to herself by claiming she was Jimi’s fiancé, by her many interviews and appearances at conventions but above all through her paintings of Jimi and her subsequent “feud” with Kathy. Michael Jeffrey was in Spain so where does this leave the murder scenario? Absolutely nowhere.
Flyswatter you are making yourself look more and more like a gullible court jester. Do you really think anything you and Buster dish out here will make me change my opinion or mind on Jimi’s death. If you answered yes to that question then you are a bigger fool than I first thought.
Flyswatter keep posting I don’t think I’ve ever laughed so much. Sorry but I don’t speak pig language like you do. I’ll give it a go though oink oink.
(Welcome to Part 2 of this series where I debunk the phony “imbibed wine” myth that conspiracy theorists use for their phony “Hendrix Murder” claim. Part One establishes the background of the phony “imbibed wine” myth and Sharon Lawrence who made up the false claim. I clearly pointed out that Sharon used to be a reporter in 1970. So, why didn’t she report this “imbibed wine” story herself if it was actually true in 1970 instead of waiting until 2001 to include it in her book? Conspiracy theorists have no answer for that. I’ll give you the answer, she made up the whole story for her book. Now It’s time to continue on to Part 2 to further expose this “imbibed wine” myth.)
“Debunking The Phony ‘Imbibed Wine’ Hendrix Myth And Why It’s A Joke”
Part Two
By Jason
The conspiracy theorists “imbibed wine” story is looking even more bleak for them. Some use it to keep the fake story going for fraudulent reasons. Others like wearing a tin foil hat believing in conspiracy theories. Even when evidence and common sense refutes their nonsense they still want to believe in a hoax. Guess I will have to refute the rest of their phony theory.
You’ve already met Sharon Lawrence the former UPI reporter who invented this fake “imbibed wine” story in 2001. Strangely, she never said a peep in 1970 when this was all relevant but waited until 2001 to surprise us with a big ‘hook” for her Jimi Hendrix fantasy book. Should all the conspiracy theorists thank her for that? We can all hear them now. “Thank you Sharon.”
Let’s meet the next two players in this phony “imbibed wine” story. It’s brought to us by Sharon Lawrence who waited 31 years to spill the beans about this important event. She really didn’t really wait 31 years to remember this story. It just popped into her head in 2001 when she made it all up to write her book. What a fraud this woman is. Enter Jack Meehan who died in 1973 and Gavin Thurston who died in 1980 but were actually real people.
So, Sharon Lawrence uses two dead people who were dead for decades as her source for her fake “imbibed wine” story. Imagine that. Two dead men who can’t refute her phony claim. That’s a favorite for fraud writers like Lawrence and Tappy Wright who can’t be challenged and for conspiracy theorists. Actually, Tappy Wright was proven to be a fraud by the late Bob Levine for making up fraudulent accounts of a crime.
Jack Meehan was a correspondent for UPI who died after a long illness in September 1973. Meehan died just 3 years after Hendrix. Dr. Gavin Thurston the famous coroner in London who wrote the final report on the death of Jimi Hendrix passed away himself in June of 1980.
Sharon Lawrence claimed in her book that Dr. Gavin Thurston told Jack Meehan that Hendrix was “fairly imbibed with wine”. Lawrence goes on to say, that Meehan then told her of that supposed account where neither one of them ever told a single living breathing person on the face of the Earth. Does anybody with an ounce of intelligence actually believe that?
Before I continue, let’s make one thing perfectly clear about why this whole story is totally made up by Lawrence. Jimi Hendrix just died a tragic unexpected death and both of these people are reporters who just got the biggest story of their career. You mean to tell me neither of these people would bother to report this anywhere especially when everybody was looking for answers to why Jimi died? Lawrence or Meehan wouldn’t want to share this story with the world who are both reporters? They wouldn’t tell Jimi’s family, a friend, Hendrix associate, or any other media colleagues? Both reporters would stay silent and not say a peep about it until Sharon Lawrence finally had this “pop into her head” when she wrote her book? Sorry, this is not how a reporter behaves when they get a huge story regarding a death of a famous person. I can see people shaking their head at this knowing full well that Lawrence made this whole thing up. Now back to the rest of this myth.
So, we have a claim printed by Sharon Lawrence where there is no documented evidence of this ever happening. We only have her word that this took place. Coincidentally, both men who supposedly had this long conversation about Hendrix, have both been dead for decades and can’t confirm if this claim is even true. So, what we have here is another one sourced quote that holds no validity. Conspiracy theorists are famous for using dead people as their source because they can’t refute what was printed because they are both dead.
Now any person with intelligence can see this for what it is, another fraudulent claim and a one sourced quote issued by a person who is not credible. As we dig deeper into this, you will see why it is totally made up and fake.
Being “imbibed with wine” is a pretty serious revelation by Dr. Thurston according to Lawrence, don’t you think? Pretty serious enough to include in his final report, right? Pretty serious enough to make public to other reporters and the press, wouldn’t you agree? But yet, Thurston made no mention of “imbibed wine” in his final autopsy report nor did any other reporter on Earth know this important information from him. Are we to believe that Thurston would omit “imbibed wine” from his report and only tell Meehan on the sly? Are we also to believe that Jack Meehan would be the only “lucky” reporter to obtain this information from Thurston? This is just head shaking stuff people. Yes, it’s already looking like it’s the end for this phony “imbibed wine” story.
As I’ve stated before, Dr. Thurston was a famous London coroner. Thurston was the deputy coroner to the Royal Household and presided over many famous cases. Thurston was a highly credited coroner and never failed to miss a single detail. Thurston made sure every minute shred of evidence was looked over and properly documented in his findings. This man was no run of the mill slob and was highly qualified in his work. Also, throw in Professor Robert Donald Teare and you have the best team available working on Hendrix.
Speaking of Teare, he performed the autopsy on Hendrix and found no wine in his lungs and only vomit. Imagine that. And here Bannister claimed Hendrix’s lungs were flooded with wine over 20 years later and Teare never even saw wine in his lungs in 1970. If Hendrix’s lungs were flooded with wine, Teare and Thurston would have documented it. There also would have been signs of trauma identified which would show Hendrix as a forced drowning victim. Both expert forensic specialists like Thurston and Teare would have known foul play would have been involved. But nothing like that ever showed up in the autopsy. That’s why forensic science will always trump phony quotes and claims from decades later. It’s also why the murder theory is just a hoax because conspiracy theorists will always lose on actual documented evidence with science. Their theory is a joke and it’s why they can never prove any real evidence to support their claims except for phony quotes.
So, nowhere in Thurston’s report does he mention anything about “imbibed wine”. If there was actually “imbibed wine” found in Hendrix, he would have included that pertinent information in his final report. He wouldn’t just decide not to include the most major finding in the autopsy. There would be no point to that. Thurston wouldn’t also decide to tell only one reporter (Jack Meehan who died in 1973) about this “historic finding” and tell nobody else on Earth. And two reporters Meehan and Lawrence who got the “biggest story of their career” wouldn’t just decide to keep it to themselves until Lawrence made her “imbibed wine” claim in her book 31 years later. One of them would have reported it if this was actually true, cuz that’s what reporters do. That’s why this is a phony claim that holds no validity that shows Lawrence clearly made this up for her book along with the rest of her fake claims.
The tin foil hatters don’t have a leg to stand on when science refutes their garbage. There will be more to come as the rest of this “imbibed wine” fairy tale is destroyed coming up in the final Part 3.
Well said Jason. You would think the coroner, being the expect, would have noticed the red wine supposedly ingested by Jimi as the cause of death. Jimi had 18 times the dosage of Vesparax in his system enough for him to pass out quickly on top of the bed fully clothed. At some point he vomited choking on his own vomit.
We can just ignore this trolling asshole Jason who is obviously making it up as he goes along as long as people will pay attention to his denial trolling…I don’t see anyone taking his blowhard carnival huckstering seriously except his clueless partner Ivana…I especially like the trolling form Jason’s posts take of obviously just learning of this from us for the first time but then pretending he is teaching it to us as an authority when the truth is he just looked it up for the first time because we told him about it…Classic troll…
Jason is an idiot and he gives short shrift to the fact Meehan and Lawrence worked for a conservative news organization that might not appreciate their exposing a CIA murder…But besides that, Jason stupidly reduces the issue to his moronic troll dialogue in order to avoid the greater evidence…These denial trolls always have to maintain the narrative and keep the discussion within the confines of their trolling evasions otherwise it will become too clear how much evidence they are avoiding and that is what Jason is doing here…It has already been explained that the wine was not an issue until Dr Bannister’s letter to Glebbeek in 1991 where he told Glebbeek that Jimi was drowned in a large amount of wine…Jason accuses Sharon Lawrence of holding back important forensic information, but he ignores the fact that there was no knowledge of the wine’s incriminating nature until 1991…Jason does this because he is just a sloppy troll who doesn’t really know what he is talking about and is just using anything he can think of in order to deny the witnessing…It shows he doesn’t have any intelligent knowledge of the evidence he is trollishly denying…
Jason then tries to dishonestly imply that Dr Thurston would have included the wine in his final autopsy report had it been real…Even though we have more than adequately mapped a pure layer of covert corruption in this case, and the authorities reflecting that corruption in their actions, this crude troll Jason ignores that, ignores Jimi’s being listed on FBI’s Security Index, ignores Jeffery’s MI-6 status and habits, and interprets the lack of any official mention by Thurston as proof of its unrealness – when any responsible researcher would realize that the opposite is true and that Thurston’s unaccountable failure to follow-through on that wine was actually proof of covert suppression…Jason is dumb enough to hope we don’t notice that he is ignoring Dr Siefert’s being caught in a direct lie about the wine and claiming he detected none when he was on video claiming “Jimi was covered in wine”…Jason is a bullshit artist who hopes you get suckered in to his denial screed and don’t notice he is ignoring pure proof of the wine in Siefert’s lie…You see Thurston wasn’t the only one who was gotten to and made to cover-up the wine…Siefert was too…Americans don’t understand that Britain never had a Constitution so such interventions are not illegal…
Another thing our carnival barker troll hopes you don’t notice is that Sharon Lawrence included a date for Meehan’s interview with Dr Thurston…She mentioned it happened on the 29th of September…Since Sharon was a reporter and was right in the middle of probably the most important rock story of her career is it very believable that she didn’t follow her training and take notes of the events as they unfolded?…Any fool would notice that if Sharon included a date for Meehan’s interview then she almost certainly recorded that event in some kind of notes…Does this risible twit Jason actually think Sharon was going to go back and tell her boss that she took no notes when she was right in the middle of it?…Nice try at stupid denial Jason but the fact Sharon included a date tells you she was recording real events as they happened, like was her job description to do…She mentioned the 29th because she obviously got it from her business colleague Jack Meehan and recorded it at the time…The reason she remembers the exact date is because 31 years later when she wrote her book she went back to those notes and retrieved the information…Thank you Jason for making the momentum kick back so strongly in my direction because of your stupid failure to deny important evidence…
Jason only reveals his idiotic denial methodology by saying Dr Teare failed to record the wine at the autopsy…Jason is just showing the world his lack of knowledge of the case and incompetency by asserting Teare failed to register the wine at the autopsy…It has already been repeatedly shown that the wine was removed and dispensed of on Friday the 18th at the hospital…Dr Teare did not examine Hendrix until 3 days later on the 21st…This is what Jason calls a strong refutation yet he trips up on basic facts of the case because his sloppy denial doesn’t require much serious knowledge or consideration of the facts…Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi…Again, more disqualifying incompetence and ignorance from Jason served as victory…Quite self-revealingly bombastic and buffoonish… And, yes, that is why “forensic science will always trump phony quotes and claims”…
Anyone who has a speck of sense will realize this blowhard horse’s ass Jason would quickly crumble if he ever confronted Sharon Lawrence directly with his easily refuted cheap bullshit…I guarantee you Sharon would quickly confirm Meehan’s interview and rip this idiot troll Jason a new one in short order…There’s nothing dumber than doing an end zone dance over an offering that actually proves our case more than anything and quickly collapses as soon as it is countered with the real facts…
LOL at Petunia below saying “Buster what you are presenting here is rhetoric”, not realizing that is all her and her brother Porky have done (hence Scott Thompson first calling her out as doing nothing but talking out of her anal sphincter), with no substance to back up what they are saying.
Of course, any substance that is produced (such as the pic of Jimi wearing the jumper scarf that Doctor Bannister witnessed Jimi wearing and correctly identified), they just counter with non-sensical rhetoric with no substance to back up what they are saying.
Just following the same protocol oh the man seen in the pic below:
Oh Buster…one more thing that shows how stupid Porky is with his “rhetoric”. He says:
“Speaking of Teare, he performed the autopsy on Hendrix and found no wine in his lungs and only vomit. Imagine that. ”
Not hard to imagine at all (except to stupid lying-denying trolls like Porky and Petunia). The wine had been suctioned out of Hendrix’s lungs using an 18-inch metal suctioning device 3 days before the autopsy was conducted. Simple as that.
We do know the autopsy reported a collapsed lung. Brian Jones was a drowning victim & I’ve never seen any reports of him having collapsed lungs. Same with John Bonham and Bon Scott after they died from choking on their own vomit after heavy drinking binges — no reports of a collapsed lung or lungs caused by vomit asphyxiation.
What would cause the collapsed lung that was found at Jimi’s autopsy? Most likely it would be that continued suctioning with that 18-inch metal suctioning device that Dr. Bannister spoke of.
Buster the clown continues to provide pure comedy for everybody reading. He repeatedly attacks my character while adding his own phony debunked conspiracy theory. Out of this entire useless post, Buster manages to refute and contradict his own phony murder theory. He also refutes the phony Tappy Wright claim as well. Hilarious! Thanks Buster!
BUSTER says: October 14, 2010
Jimi was murdered by classic CIA alcoholic waterboarding in combination with barbiturates.
BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
The very first post Buster wrote on this site, Buster says Hendrix was forced drowned by “alcoholic waterboarding” with barbiturates. Even though waterboarding isn’t used as a method to murder someone, Buster is still clueless promoting his phony theory.
Then on August 22, Buster refutes his own original phony murder theory by contradicting his own claim saying “which means no one would need to force wine into Jimi.”
He first says Hendrix was forced drowned with pills and wine and now he says he wasn’t.
See how Buster contradicts his own garbage and makes stuff up as he goes along? When his phony theory is refuted he completely changes it into something else. Very pathetic.
Here is Tappy Wright’s bogus claim that Buster believes and manages to refute as well with his newly changed.contradiction.
“I was in London the night of Jimi’s death and together with some old friends…we went round to Monika’s [Jimi’s girlfriend] hotel room, got a handful of pills and stuffed them into his mouth…then poured a few bottles of red wine deep into his windpipe. I had to do it. Jimi was worth much more to me dead than alive. That son of a bitch was going to leave me. If I lost him, I’d lose everything.” – Tappy Wright’s phony Michael Jeffery quote
BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
Tappy Wright claimed in his phony quote that Michael Jeffery stuffed pills and wine down Jimi’s windpipe. That would have been done by force cuz Hendrix wouldn’t allow someone to do that to him.
Buster the clown now refutes Tappy Wright’s phony claim that Jeffery forced pills and wine down Hendrix cuz Buster said “no one would need to force wine into Jimi.
So, Buster now refutes his first post by claiming Hendrix was forced drowned with alcohol.
Then he refutes Tappy Wright’s false story that Jeffery forced pills and wine into him
Buster the clown refuted himself and Tappy Wright too. Hilarious! Buster can’t be taken very seriously with contradictions like this when he refutes the entire basis of his own phony murder claim. Head shaking stuff, man.
Buster what you are presenting here is rhetoric. Of all the supposed opportunities the CIA had of murdering Jimi they chose an obscure flat in Notting Hill to do the deed with an equally primitive method. Of all the books that have been written about Jimi no-one implicates the CIA, the mafia or Michael Jeffrey except for the Aleem twins. So we are to suppose these authors are also clueless or is it that you are spinning a yarn here Buster? You have repeatedly accused Michael Jeffrey of murdering Jimi but we know he was in Spain. Then comes the Mafia who use equally as dangerous tactics. You have now reverted back to your original claim of the CIA. I think it takes a particular mindset to come up with the scenarios you put forward Buster and I do not think it is a healthy one. Jason and I have refuted your claims because we simply do not see any truth in them. As I have stated before using derogatory language in order to heighten your claims does not make you look any more credible it has the opposite affect.
You’re stupid Ivana and you’re too dumb to realize how intelligence-insulting your input is…You’re doing it again and answering good evidence with bloviating opinion and worthless rumination…Your input is useless because it violates the rules of evidence…Your posts answer specifics with generalities, facts with opinion, and move from a greater to a lesser…The form of your input disqualifies you because it always moves away from the evidence, which only shows the public that you are not honestly interested in the facts…
As Flyswatter said, you are accusing us of what you are guilty of and it is YOU who is offering the rhetoric…If you were smarter and more credible you would realize the reason we have so much evidence is exactly because Jeffery had to rush his killing of Jimi because he fired him at 5pm on the 17th…All you and Jason are doing is ignoring our evidence and returning with a denial filibuster…It isn’t cutting it and people can see you are ignoring the evidence you are calling for and answering it with evasive blabber…Any skilled detective would see evidence of evasion of honest investigation in the circumstances of this case that could only be explained by covert control…You offer unintelligent input if you ignore the fact that Jimi was on the Security Index and therefore would be monitored by US Intel…That monitoring would have necessarily known about Jimi’s troubles with Jeffery and the rest of the evidence we are exposing, so it can be assumed Intel deliberately avoided recognizing and exposing what really happened, which then constitutes involvement…Because you are always seeking the shallow and evasive you move in the opposite direction of all this and therefore don’t offer any credible input…So the long and the short of it is we offer the best insightful skilled analysis that exposes a covert CIA murder and you offer useless internet trolling and denial…It is also inherently moronic for you to say Michael could not have murdered Jimi because he was in Spain…You are dishonestly ignoring that Michael had the motive because Jimi had fired him 12 hours earlier and he would have done jail time for the money he stole…Jeffery had to kill Jimi before he flew back to the protection US jurisdiction…It is also quite dishonest of you to ignore that the murder method was quite effective in concealing the true cause of Jimi’s death for all these years…Part of the reason they got away with it for so long was Monika’s key role in keeping up the official story, while you pretend to be a strict checker of facts, while not saying a word about Monika’s proven lies…
Ivana: You lost this debate when you refused to spell-out a scenario of how Jimi died and attach it to a detailed timeline…You are not practicing what you preach…You are claiming Jimi died from choking on vomit after a drug overdose…We are at a level where you have to be able to articulate that on an evidence/forensic basis…If you refuse you are simply forfeiting the debate and do not have anything to say…You’re not fooling anyone Ivana…You know nothing about this and your main input is denial bullshit…
No doubt, Buster, you have to laugh at how Petunia just keeps oinking out her repeated dumb shit, such as this:
” Jimi was dead when he arrived at the hospital why would Dr Bannister be working on someone who was deceased. From my reading Jimi went straight down to the morgue he never went to emergency. This is what I mentioned in conflicting information”
That’s absolute bullshit. Both Bannister and Seifert stated that they did work on him. What Petunia overlooks is they were dealing with a John Doe casualty with no clue about what had happened & how long he had been in the state that he was.
We know that 30 minutes were spent on trying to revive Elvis Presley, even though they knew he was dead. Brian Epstein — attempts to resuscitate Epstein were made for 40 minutes before he was transported to the hospital, at which point medical personnel tried to revive him for another 20 minutes.
Petunia’s statement of Jimi never being in emergency (casualty) is completely false & the pic below proves it, as it is a fragment of the coroner’s form (the full photocopy of it is nowhere to be found) & it clearly states “Unable to resuscitate”. Where else would they attempt to resuscitate other than emergency (casualty)? Petunia oinks out this nonsense about conflicting information, when in reality, it’s really just her blatant refusal to cite CORRECT information.
FLYSWATTER says: That’s absolute bullshit. Both Bannister and Seifert stated that they did work on him. What Petunia overlooks is they were dealing with a John Doe casualty with no clue about what had happened & how long he had been in the state that he was.
We know that 30 minutes were spent on trying to revive Elvis Presley, even though they knew he was dead. Brian Epstein — attempts to resuscitate Epstein were made for 40 minutes before he was transported to the hospital, at which point medical personnel tried to revive him for another 20 minutes.
Would any doctor seriously spend a half hour on a person who’s been already dead for hours? No. Siefert and Bannister both said any attempt was a formality. There was no half hour attempt or removing wine. You are proven wrong again.
“Jimi was rushed into the resus[citation] room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes, he was dead.”- Doctor Siefert
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality. – Doctor Bannister
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time.” – Doctor Bannister
Read these quotes. He was dead. It was a formality.
BUSTER says: All you and Jason are doing is ignoring our evidence and returning with a denial filibuster…It isn’t cutting it and people can see you are ignoring the evidence you are calling for and answering it with evasive blabber.
Yes, i am ignoring your crappy “evidence”. It isn’t evidence. It’s made up quotes, hearsay, innuendos, your made up conspiracy theories, outrageous claims with no evidence to prove.
BUSTER says: Any skilled detective would see evidence of evasion of honest investigation in the circumstances of this case that could only be explained by covert control…You offer unintelligent input if you ignore the fact that Jimi was on the Security Index and therefore would be monitored by US Intel
Now you spin a bogus conspiracy you made up for your “evidence”. I am ignoring it.
BUSTER says: That monitoring would have necessarily known about Jimi’s troubles with Jeffery and the rest of the evidence we are exposing, so it can be assumed Intel deliberately avoided recognizing and exposing what really happened, which then constitutes involvement…Because you are always seeking the shallow and evasive you move in the opposite direction of all this and therefore don’t offer any credible input…So the long and the short of it is we offer the best insightful skilled analysis that exposes a covert CIA murder and you offer useless internet trolling and denial…It is also inherently moronic for you to say Michael could not have murdered Jimi because he was in Spain…You are dishonestly ignoring that Michael had the motive because Jimi had fired him 12 hours earlier and he would have done jail time for the money he stole…Jeffery had to kill Jimi before he flew back to the protection US jurisdiction…It is also quite dishonest of you to ignore that the murder method was quite effective in concealing the true cause of Jimi’s death for all these years…Part of the reason they got away with it for so long was Monika’s key role in keeping up the official story, while you pretend to be a strict checker of facts, while not saying a word about Monika’s proven lies.
So you spin a phony theory you made up based on a false account. Jimi never fired Jeffery 12 hours earlier. You are lying.
“While at the hotel, Hendrix made several telephone calls. Dannemann said he phoned his lawyer Henry Steingarten, asking him to find a way out of his contract with his manager Mike Jeffery, and producer Eddie Kramer, for whom Hendrix left a voice message.”
Here is it….Monika said Jimi phoned his lawyer “looking for a way to get out of his contract” NOT that “Jimi fired Jeffery”…….so you lied again Buster…..and lost your phony murder motive….Jeffery was in Spain and wasn’t fired like you claim. How do you like them apples?
You just make up stuff and look like a total clown. Some big expert you are. LOL
So Buster, since Jeffery was in Spain and wasn’t fired as a motive to kill…..who murdered Jimi Hendrix?
I do not need to back up anything as you are the ones making the accusations of murder. The way you operate is that a few know the truth and the masses are ignorant of it and need to be made aware of it. You claim to know the true events of that morning so please supply your sources, what your accusations are and who you are accusing. Your whole premise so far has rested on Michael Jeffrey but it is well known he was in Spain. Perhaps the folks of Crosstown Torrents shed light on your accusations long ago and revealed them for what they really are.
Flyswatter, Jimi was dead when he arrived at the hospital why would Dr Bannister be working on someone who was deceased. From my reading Jimi went straight down to the morgue he never went to emergency. This is what I mentioned in conflicting information. So if that is the case where did he get the red wine scenario from. The red wine story came into play years later and no wonder there was no mention of the red wine in the autopsy. Read up on your facts and don’t use the information that best suits your purposes. Don’t forget to answer the questions from my previous post.
Are you serious, Flyswatter? Jimi had been dead for five hours before the ambulance was called. The ambulance men could both tell in the state Jimi was in that he had been dead for a while. As is customary both these men would have spoken to the doctors on arrival at the hospital. Professor Teare identified in his report that Jimi had the Vesparax, Seconal, and amphetamine in his system. The high dosage of Vesparax in his system killed Jimi. As for the killing of Jimi by Michael Jeffrey what exactly is the evidence that you have? We are back to Jeffrey and Monika again are we? You are both myth makers and you continue to add to this ludicrous scenario. For what purpose is beyond me. You just look like fools who deal in fantasy. Dr. Seifert said they worked on Jimi for a few minutes believing that he arrived at the hospital dead. It was merely a formality. GET IT?
Good, you finally committed to a time of death…It is correct and matches Dr Crompton’s claimed 5:30am time of death from the undigested rice found in Jimi’s stomach at autopsy…
The high dosage of Vesparax in Jimi’s system did not kill him…You have proven it yourself by admitting Jimi died around 5:30am…Jimi’s autopsy found a .7mg barbiturate blood level…While it is a dangerous level it is not an automatically lethal one for persons like Jimi with a known tolerance…Monika hired some German doctors to determine if her pills would have killed Jimi…They said the same thing – that the pills would not have killed him…You are making false statements that were determined to be opposite what you say by medical professionals…
Again you are stupidly making us repeat already-posted information…The hospital report showed they worked on Jimi from 11:45 to 12:15 when they quit…Dr Bannister told me in person that it took him and Dr Siefert 20 minutes to suction the wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach before they could even attempt resuscitation…That 20 minutes is registered in the hospital report…There’s your proof of the wine for people who aren’t looking to trollishly deny anything they see…
You are a fraud Ivana and you are quoting the doctor who was caught red-handed lying about the wine…That’s the doctor you are backing while ignoring the fact he was the proven liar between the two doctors…Every time I mention that we proved Dr Siefert was the liar and was caught making a serious lie over the wine you ignore it and troll us with name-calling like “myth-makers” and “fools”…I don’ t think so Ivana, and anyone can look at this thread and see you are ignoring evidence…
You’re a liar Ivana because the number of pills Jimi took (9) was not enough to kill let alone in only 2 hours or less…That’s why I’m trying to get you to commit to a specific scenario because the Underwriter Laboratories case histories for Vesparax overdoses shows that people don’t die in less than 4 hours from doses of 10-15 tablets and Jimi only took 9 and had a known tolerance…You just locked yourself in to a 2 hour or less absorption period and science proves Vesparax can’t kill in only 2 hours or less for that dosage…So that means it had to be something else and the wine doctor Bannister witnessed had to therefore have been the cause of death…
That 11:45AM to 12:15PM timeline was published in Mitch Mitchell’s book that came out in 1990 & that was before Dr. Bannister wrote his letter to Harry Shapiro on Jan. 9, 1992. A pic of that can be seen below.
Petunia(Ivana) states that Jimi had been dead for 5 hours , but never considers why nobody that was at the Samarkand that morning (Monika, Burdon, Bridges, Slater, Barrett, and Stickells) so much as lifted a finger to help to help Jimi & waited 5 hours to call an ambulance.
This troll leaves out the “black bomber” that killed Jimi.
So Buster just how many liars are we dealing with here? I go by the coroners report cause of death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. I, like you, am a bystander and onlooker in all of this so to call me a liar when I get my information from the biographies is pointless and silly. You are painting everyone as a liar yet you are keen to believe Dr. Bannister someone who fits in well with the wine theory. The pills were enough to kill him because they caused Jimi to choke on his own vomit. If Jimi took the pills with the wine we know this is a lethal combination. Jimi passed out quickly because he was fully clothed on top of the bed and perhaps the wine splattered about him as he fell unconscious as Michael Fairchild states in one of his possible causes. The ambulance was called five hours later as stated by Kathy Etchingham and Michael Fairchild. So Jimi had been dead for at least that long. Please produce official evidence which states that the wine caused Jimi’s death. The problem I have with all of this is an overwhelming need to prove that the wine caused Jimi’s death and refuting the reports that the high dosage of sleeping pills caused Jimi’s death. All of this points to you knowing the real truth and all of us being lead down a garden path of lies. I have a real problem with that Buster as it shows a manipulation and distortion of the official record.
Flyswatter I have the Mitch Mitchell book. The verdict is inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication not the red wine. This is the official report. I agree with Mitch when he says it is all speculation since you can never really know what was going on in Jimi’s mind at the time. But from others accounts Jimi was supposedly in a very positive frame of mind and Chas Chandler disliked immensely the portrayal of Jimi as a sad figure when he states that Jimi’s life was full of fun. The people at the Samarkand that morning were reportedly cleaning the apartment or Monika hesitated in calling the ambulance. This had been suggested so I have no right to refute this as I was not present that morning. I can only go by what have read.
Dr Bannister and Dr. Seifert did not suction anything out of Jimi it was in fact the ambulance officers who did this at the Samarkand Hotel. The vomit was dry and all the way down. They transported Jimi to St. Mary’s hospital where the doctors pounded Jimi’s heart for a short while but he was clearly flatlined/dead. It is the doctors job to pronounce someone dead and time of death. The officers both told the same story to Kathy Etchingham having had no contact in years during her investigation. Again no mention of the wine only dry vomit on Jimi’s clothing and surrounding bedding. Clearly, Dr. Bannister was being less than truthful in your conversation with him or this conversation never occurred. It was something you concocted. Please produce evidence of this meeting. If you want to read this for yourself go to Michael Fairchild carefully researched information.
Ivana: You might want to learn about what you are talking about before correcting some of the world’s best experts on the subject…You are too insolent to realize you are talking to some of the world’s best experts on the subject and are only making a fool of yourself…I know Michael Fairchild…I know or know of most of the biography authors you are referencing…If you bothered to credibly study the subject the actual quote from the ambulance attendants gotten by Kathy Etchingham was that the vomit was too hard and dry in the throat for them to clear an airway with their ambulance suctioning equipment…If you knew what you were talking about (which you obviously don’t) you would know that the ambulance attendants told Kathy that it was because their equipment could not penetrate that hard plug of vomit that they decided to get Jimi to the hospital so they could access equipment that could…This is a well known part of the official record that you are obviously clueless over but that doesn’t stop you from trying to correct two of the internet’s best experts on the subject with wrong information…
You are dishonestly trying to interpret evidence in order to deny the wine…The truth is the hard plug of vomit that the ambulance men couldn’t penetrate at the Samarkand was broken through at St Mary’s and below it was wine that flooded Jimi’s stomach and lungs up to the throat…The hard vomit was like a cork and when they unplugged it the wine was beneath…This was evidence of wine that was poured in to Jimi until he could hold no more…Evidence of “overkill” to make sure the job was done and he was dead…Dr Bannister and Siefert took 20 minutes to remove the wine because every time they cleared the lungs they would refill from wine from the stomach…The reason there is no mention of the massive amount of wine in the body from the ambulance attendants is because they never got to it because of the hard blockage of vomit that their ambulance equipment couldn’t penetrate…It is right there in the record if you read about it…
Ivana, you will not be able to find any other real drug/alcohol choking on vomit death that had so much vomit and so much wine with only a 5mg blood alcohol content…You keep saying Jimi was a perfectly ordinary choking on vomit overdose death…That isn’t true because you won’t find a single other real choking on vomit overdose death where the victim had tons of vomit and 5 bottles of wine flooding their lungs and stomach, with only a 5mg blood alcohol content…You won’t be able to do it because Jimi was murdered by having bottles of wine poured down his throat when he was deliberately given sleeping pills to make him pass-out…
Try answering this directly instead of wandering off in to your bullshit ruminations…
She won’t answer anything directly. It will be just more ruminating garbage coming out her ass, as that is all she can offer. Her and her brother Porky (Jason) talk about this subject like a couple of politicians campaigning for a vote or something, just spewing fabricated BS as they go.
There was no “plug of corked vomit” with wine beneath. That is a bogus b.s. made up story by you. The vomit was dry and not hard. There was no “plug of hard vomit”. That would be impossible. You are making up another false story to look for any excuse for a “wine claim”.
You already refuted this new phony theory of yours in a previous post you made from July. It’s easy to see how you make up things as you go along. Hilarious and very pathetic.
BUSTER says: July 31, 2019
I spoke to Dr Bannister personally and he told me that Jimi was drowned in at least 5 bottles of wine…He said when he opened Jimi’s mouth to resuscitate him that there was wine up to the throat…A clever detective would see that the amount of wine was wine that was poured in to Jimi until he could hold no more…This is called “overkill” in criminology to make sure the job was done…That same smart detective would realize that for wine to be up to the mouth would mean everything beneath it was flooded and that the volume of that flooding would be about 5 bottles of wine.
In this post from July you’re claiming that Hendrix was filled to the brim with wine pouring out of his mouth. The ambulance men saw no wine coming out of his mouth at the flat. Also, if he was filled with wine to the brim no hardened plug of vomit could form since the liquid wine flooded inside him would prevent that from happening.
No articles from 9/18/70 state anything about wine or “hardened plugs of vomit”. No ambulance man said there were “hardened plugs of vomit”. That is not possible to happen anyway.
Your phony theory is a joke and has has been put to bed.
Either that or there was no wine. The doctors clearly stated they pounded Jimi’s heart but to no avail as Jimi was clearly dead. It was merely a formality on their part. Buster you seem to know a hell of a lot of people connected with this story but no one mentions the copious amounts of red wine only you, Flyswatter and Tappy Wright. The vomit was dry and hard meaning that Jimi had been dead for a while consistent with the ambulance being called hours later. You would think the ambulance officers would have noticed the copious amounts of red wine but it’s funny how that only talk about large amounts of vomit. If Jimi had ingested any of the wine then his blood alcohol level would have been much higher so that could not have been wine being suctioned out of Jimi. Remember that Jimi died in the early hours of the morning therefore the alcohol would have dried up along with the vomit. The ambulance officers surely would have noticed this. The vomit was all the way down therefore they were able to penetrate quite deeply. Any of the doctors would have mentioned the wine as the cause of death in their reports but all that was reported was the vomit and the barbiturate levels. This is consistent with the autopsy report and the actual cause of death. What worries me more out of all of this is your persistence with the murder theory and you reluctance to let go of it even though it has been disproven. You seem to want to sow the seeds of doubt in people’s minds but only the gullible would fall for what you put out there.
Dr Seifert “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor but is was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times but there was no point in doing anything else as he was dead”. No mention of the copious amounts of red wine is there? Jimi died at the Samarkand Hotel, the autopsy report was re-examined as part of Kathy’s investigation. Buster kindly stop re-inventing the story to fit in with your murder theory. You placed your trust in Wright’s story when it was clearly a fraudulent account of what really happened to Jimi that morning. I even doubt that you know any of the authors who you claim to know they would not be associating with a conspiracy theorist. You would not even be in the same league as them. These are serious researchers.
Dr/ Senator Bob Brown was a locum working in the ED the morning Jimi was brought in. He states Jimi was dead and there was nothing they could do. Again no mention of working on Jimi for twenty minutes as claimed by Buster and Flyswatter. As for Dr Seifert the same no mention of working on Jimi for twenty minutes and no witnessing of the copious amounts of red wine. Dr Bannister’s report should be read with caution as he said in an interview that Jimi was an unusually tall man his feet hanging over the hospital trolley by ten inches. Where are you getting your information from Buster, and just who are your sources? Don’t forget to tell me who exactly murdered Jimi Hendrix?
There’s another quote out there from Bob Brown that said when he walked in along side Jimi’s gurney that it was obvious Jimi was beyond medical remedy and had suffered some kind of misadventure involving wine…Bob Brown only walked along side the gurney and then handed Jimi off to Siefert and Bannister…You are offering idiotic strawmen Ivana…Brown could not mention the 20 minutes of suctioning if he wasn’t there to witness it…It just shows how dishonest you are and desperate to avoid the wine evidence that you enter that idiotic misrepresentation of the wine while using that inaccurate strawman to avoid answering what I proved in my last post…That’s trolling Ivana…There’s no other name for a person who declares that they are just a bystander in all this but then proceeds to follow such a dishonest course of conduct…
The wine was witnessed by the time entered on the hospital record…I think Glebbeek showed that hospital record in his ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication…What Mitch wrote was wrong…The hospital record showed that Jimi was treated from 11:45 to 12:15 when they quit off him…He wasn’t declared dead officially until 12:45…The 20 minutes of suctioning is evidenced in that record because if Jimi was dead and had no wine as Ivana trolls, then they wouldn’t have taken a half hour to try and revive a flat-lining dead man…Their equipment cleared the hard vomit plug and opened the throat in short time whereon they then encountered wine that flooded all the way up to the larynx, as was witnessed by the attending doctor, Dr Bannister…There was so much wine in Jimi’s body that it took them 20 minutes to clear it before they could even attempt resuscitation…This was told to me in person by Dr Bannister…A similar account was also written in the letter to Glebbeek…Dr Siefert was obviously gotten to and was lying because the removal of the wine was indirectly evidenced by the time periods captured in the hospital record because they would not spend a half hour on a dead man with no wine flooding his lungs and stomach…But what this piece of shit Ivana is deliberately ignoring is the fact Scotland Yard avoided seeking-out the nurses who could have easily told of this had they been asked…Ivana is also perfectly OK with Scotland Yard never interviewing Dr Bannister…And she also seems to be going out of her way to avoid admitting Dr Siefert was caught saying on video that “Jimi was covered in red wine” and was then later quoted, after Tappy’s book came out and made it dangerous, saying “I detected no alcohol on Jimi”…This obnoxious lying troll Ivana is pretending she is honestly considering the evidence and playing devil’s advocate but anyone with learned experience in this matter will see she is dedicatedly looking to deny the murder evidence at all costs while asking people to think she is sincere…Ivana straight dodged my point that you won’t be able to find any real drug/alcohol choking on vomit death where the victim had profuse vomit, 5 bottles of wine flooding their stomach and lungs, and only a 5mg blood alcohol content…The profuse vomit is not normally seen in such deaths…They usually end with the victim gurgling some vomit in their throat that gets breathed in to the lungs…The reason Jimi had so much vomit was because of an action-reaction event from having so much wine poured in to his body…Wine is thicker than water and would also be more likely to collapse a lung after engorging it and being suctioned out…
You shouldn’t be allowed to do this Ivana…You are ignoring evidence and making regressive dishonest responses based on faulty information that has already been disproved by what you are ignoring…I can’t think of anything more evil or low than trolling Jimi’s murder…
There was no 5 bottles of wine in Hendrix and there was no suctioning of wine. There is no official record of this ever happening on 9/18/70.
More conspiracy b.s. coming from you with your own made up spin of events with bogus claims of this person was “gotten to” No proof of this and only made up stuff by you.
Buster is upset that his phony theory is exposed as a fraud.
Are you serious Buster Jimi was dead when the ambulance men arrived at the Samarkand Hotel, and both Dr Seifert and Dr Brown both state that Jimi was dead when he arrived at the ED there was no suctioning done at the hospital this was performed by the ambulance officers at the hotel. Dr Bannister is the only one to talk about the copious amounts of red wine. Dr Crompton states that the level of Quinalbarbitone in the blood should not be above 0.5mgs/100ml at the very most. Therefore the amount in Jimi’s blood, found in the post-mortem to be 0.7mgs/100ml, was a toxic level. This seriously inhibited Jimi’s coughing reflex. Dr Seifert pounded Jimi’s heart as a mere formality as he was flat-lined/dead. Your scenario Buster implies that Jimi was unconscious when brought in and this warranted the half hour resuscitation attempt. You are forgetting that Jimi had been dead quite a while before the ambulance was called. This is revealed in the autopsy by the ingestion of the rice Jimi ate at the party. Buster you are re-writing the record here and in my mind you are tampering with the established evidence. Let’s not forget that the amount Jimi had taken of the Vesparax was many times the stated dosage of only half a tablet. As for the Scotland Yard investigation it is obvious that they did not need to seek out the nurses; this is just setting the cat among the pigeons. I would stop this nonsense if I were you Buster it has all been done and dusted. No amount of name calling will make you look any more credible it makes you look desperate.
I have just finished talking to a neighbour who is a doctor about Jimi. He said that the ambulance officers both acted appropriately in their care of Jimi as it is there duty to keep trying to help a patient. If a patient is DOA at the hospital the doctors would then assess whether it is appropriate to continue helping that patient. The pounding of Jimi’s chest was done only in order to establish a time of death as Jimi was beyond help. The patient is then placed in the coroner’s care in order to determine cause of death.
Justin: Could you help us here?…There is a required level of basic honest discussion and recognition of facts that Ivana is deliberately defying here and offering ridiculous claims that violate some of the basic proven facts of the case…This site has been a good place to discuss the facts behind Jimi’s death in an intelligent and reasonable manner, however Ivana has decided to come in and oppose most of the basic facts of the case in what is now turning out to be a totally uncredible and silly way that destroys the previous decorum of this room…I agree with free speech and usually try to extend it to even my worst enemies on principle, however there is a point where extension of free speech to persons who offer no honest input and only intend to vandalize what has been established by reasonable means becomes foolish and works against the overall purpose of the board…I think Ivana has crossed that line…If you look at her input she is ignoring cited references and re-entering provably false claims…Kathy Etchingham’s investigation obtained a quote from the ambulance men saying their suction device that they used was not adequate to penetrate the hardened plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat and because of that they decided to get Jimi to the hospital in order to access equipment that could…Also, Kathy got one of the cops to say they pretty much bundled Jimi up and transported him to the hospital…The ambulance is on record as being called at 11:18 and having left the Samarkand around 11:30…
Justin: Ivana’s ignoring of the valid citation of Kathy’s investigation and just repeating another chanting of her denial rhetoric is grounds to cite her as an unserious troll who is not here to discuss the evidence rationally or logically but is here instead to vandalize the site and the thread…I mean free speech is one thing but at some point you have to judge input and intent and I think we are well past the point of determining that Ivana is not here for honest purposes and is not making any honest effort to understand the facts we are explaining to her or how they affect the evidence…
Another example is her quote on the Vesparax…The true context of that quote is that Dr Crompton was gotten to after he correctly cited that the undigested rice in Jimi’s stomach precluded any time of death after 5:30am…This was a damning witnessing so pressure was put on Crompton and he was later quoted as saying he made that determination based on out-dated forensic science…The problem with that retraction is there is no out-dating of a basic determination of the digestive quality of rice…You couldn’t cite a valid scientific “out-dating” of the forensic science of determining the digestive state of rice…Crompton was lying and somebody had put pressure on him to retract…
Crompton’s analysis of the Quinalbarbitone (American “Secobarbital”) doesn’t include the basic fact that the product manufacturer stated in their product information that lethal dose threshold was “9 to 10 tablets”…Ivana is trying to tell us that a .5mg blood barbiturate level is the lethal dose threshold but that is not correct as shown by the product manufacturer’s information I just cited…I know this case through and through and the quote Ivana cited was gotten from Crompton after he had been forced to retract…The correct information is that Jimi took 9 tablets while having an infamous tolerance for barbiturates…He was nowhere close to lethal dose as the doctors Monika hired correctly determined…
Furthermore, Ivana is ignorant of the fact the correct time of death at 5:30am means Jimi only had the pills in him for 2 hours maximum…According to that same manufacturer’s product information, the Vesparax level found in Jimi’s blood could have been reached in as little as an hour…What Ivana is not credibly, scientifically accounting for is that the 5:30am time of death she admits proves the Vesparax could not have killed Jimi…Caesar Glebbeek managed to access the Underwriter Laboratories case histories for Vesparax overdoses and he found that persons who took 10 to 15 pills never died in less than 4 hours…Ivana is insisting that Jimi died a perfectly understandable overdose death from the Vesparax but she has ignored several times now the science that proves otherwise…Jimi only took a borderline lethal dose of 9 pills…That lethal dose threshold is determined for persons with no tolerance…Jimi had an infamous tolerance which means the 9 pills he took would not have killed him, and especially not have killed him in only 1 to 2 hours…Therefore the reason Jimi died was because of the 5 bottles of wine Dr Bannister removed from Jimi’s stomach and lungs at St Mary’s…It drowned him when he was 1 to 2 hours in to a dangerous dose of Vesparax, but one that would not have killed him…This is proven by the 5mg blood alcohol content and is forensic proof of homicide…The British government has acted criminally in avoiding any honest pursuit of this correct evidence…And so has Ivana who is obviously doing her best to ignore this valid proof…
Buster is trying to silence people’s voices who proves his phony theory to be wrong. Shameful that you want to take away a person’s Freedom of Speech that shows you to be inept.
Justin I will save you the trouble. What Buster is insinuating here is that the doctors changed their story after they were warned. This is absolute nonsense and shows clearly that Buster is making it up as he goes along. He will do anything to add to his murder theory. Anyone with any sense will see Buster’s post for what they really are-pure fantasy. The folks at Crosstown Torrents and Electric Guru I think understood this and had him banned from their sites. I go by the coroner’s report pure and simple. That is the truth of the matter. I will no longer be posting as I do not want to give Buster any more opportunities to further his murder claims.
Ivana offers nothing but a skeptical view that is designed to ignore or deny all the facts we discuss and simply come to the conclusion the official story was right and Jimi died from an accidental death no matter what she is shown…Ivana is ignorant that Dr Crompton was involved in a controversial ruling involving Petar Sutovic, a Serbian youth who was murdered for body parts…Crompton called it a morphine overdose because of political pressure…So he has a record of making himself available to political rulings…Ivana thinks that she is above evidence and can answer fact with rhetoric…As I said before, Crompton showed evidence of changing his story under pressure…There is no out-dating of the forensic science in determining the digestive quality of a grain of rice and neither Crompton or Ivana answered that…Crompton was obviously under pressure to change his 5:30am time of death…He claimed that he used antiquated methods to determine the digestive state of the rice, but the problem is there was no antiquation of that process and it is done the same now as it was then…It is a simple visual observation…
Ivana has yet to show any recognition that we have proof Dr Siefert changed his story…He is on video tape from the 1990’s where he says “Jimi was covered in red wine”…After Tappy’s book came out Glebbeek got a quote from him saying “I detected no alcohol on Jimi”…So while Ivana pretends to be a harsh critic of claims and demands proof for everything she shows no interest in Siefert being caught red-handed telling two opposite stories for the same event or its implications…There’s no jury in the world that would look at that and not come to the conclusion that Siefert lied in order to cover-up something dangerous…Ivana is outraged and insisting I am trying to get away with crazy fantasy but so far she’s done her best to avoid recognizing that all this is already proven and is part of the official record…Only a fool would not realize Siefert lied because he knew of the danger of what he witnessed and therefore what really happened…
Dr Thurston told that to Jack Meehan no matter how much the two obvious denial trolls Ivana and Jason want to deny it…Ivana thinks I am outrageously loose with my claims and beyond the pale but she ignores in public that the Chief Coroner in the case gave witness to the large amount of wine in Jimi’s stomach and then failed to follow-through as the serious legal/medical ethics and laws he was beholden to required…Ivana asks us to allow her to interpret it backwards and say it proves it never happened and there was no red wine…However she ignores the fact we have several other instances of unaccountable avoidance of serious evidence and simple investigative follow-through glaring out in the case…This goes all the way back to the Inquest that never involved Thurston’s large amount of wine in the stomach; or called any of the medical witnesses; that accepted Monika’s crock of shit without question and used it to determine the forensics; and never even determined a time of death…
Beyond this we have Kathy exposing Monika’s story to be nothing but complete lies and proving that the time of death was off by 6 hours, and Dr Bannister coming forward to say there was highly suspicious medical evidence of Jimi being drowned in wine…Scotland Yard’s reaction was to lie and make excuses around it…They lied about there being no new evidence when in fact there was serious new evidence and they failed to interview Dr Bannister…They failed to seek out the nurses who would have witnessed the wine and when Tappy came out with his claim they showed no interest and didn’t even interview him…So while Ivana claims I am making wild and crazy accusations she ignores that we have a full mortared brick wall of confirming facts that show exactly that – that the British government was directly hands-on involved in actively covering this up and guiding the investigation around the evidence…Never has so much obvious evidence been so obscenely denied…
As to Crosstown Torrents and Electric Guru the individuals involved in banning me didn’t even get as far as reading my case…They simply said they were not going to allow the topic period and when I protested that was a violation of Jimi I got banned…On Crosstown it was done by a British moderator with an obvious national agenda…On Guru by an expat American woman who worked in London and obviously didn’t want any compromises affecting her career…Of course Ivana instantly credits clueless idiots and their depraved disinterest…
Ivana is dishonestly hiding behind the coroner’s report, but she’s ignoring that it is useless because it did not consider the real time of death or the wine that was witnessed drowning Jimi…Ivana ignores that Jeffery was Military Intelligence which is also MI-6…Once you cross in to that magic land of intrigue the rest makes perfect sense for those who think beyond the official story and are able to detect the fingerprints of its methods…Her input is too simple to take seriously and shows willful disregard for the most intelligent evidence…
it’s very clear that Buster the clown only wants to argue his phony conspiracy theory and ignore the facts from 9/18/70. There was nothing documented or spoken about wine on 9/18/70. Not from any ambulance man, police man, doctor, coroner, or pathologist. The false claims of wine came from Bannister himself in 1992 and that’s what Buster wants to argue.
Buster’s only defense is to attack Teare claiming he forged the autopsy numbers. His only other defense is to attack Crompton and whoever else disputes his garbage with actual scientific facts.
He also claims all these people were “gotten to” who refutes his nonsense. They very definition of a conspiracy theorist and why people who read his posts laugh and shake their heads.
Sorry Buster, “Thurston never told Meehan” anything. That was a fake second hand quote from Sharon Lawrence in her fake book. I’ve already debunked that in detail with Part 3 on the way. Don’t know why you feel the need to use fake “evidence” repeating false claims for your failed debate.
Pop Star Jimi Hendrix Dies
September 18, 1970
London (AP) Jimi Hendrix, the American Pop singer died today in London.
Hendrix, 27, was reported dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital in the Kensington area of London this morning.
Police sources say that Hendrix died of an apparent drug overdose and that no foul play was involved.
British blues singer and close friend of Hendrix, Eric Burdon said “All I know is that he had taken some sleeping tablets.”
A coroner’s officer took possession of the sleeping tablets where Hendrix was staying with a girlfriend instead of the Cumberland Hotel where he was registered.
Doctors at St. Mary Abbots Hospital stated that an overdose of drugs was the apparent cause of death.
A hospital spokesman issued the following official statement regarding the death of Hendrix. “We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”
His body was taken from the hospital to a southwest London morgue for an autopsy after he was pronounced dead. The official cause of death will not be determined until a post mortem.
Hendrix was arrested last year in Toronto, Canada for possession of hashish and heroin, but was acquitted. During the trial he said he used marijuana, hashish, LSD and cocaine but never heroin. His most popular song, Purple Haze, was descriptive of drug culture.
Here’s an article on Hendrix’s death from 9/18/70.
The article states that Hendrix was dead on arrival. The police saw no wine on the scene and said it was an apparent drug overdose. The police took the other pills as evidence. If there was all this massive wine the police would have stated that. The police confirmed no foul play. There goes the phony wine theory.
Check this out….the doctors at the hospital “stated an overdose of drugs was the apparent cause of death.” The doctors were Bannister, Siefert, Brown. All 3 of them that day said nothing about “wine” as a cause of death. They only stated drugs. If there was all this wine from Hendrix, Bannister would have stated wine and not drugs. Nothing about wine at all on 9/18/70. There goes the phony wine theory.
The hospital spokesman said it was drugs and not wine. There goes the phony wine theory.
Here’s another one….”His body was taken from the hospital to a southwest London morgue for an autopsy after he was pronounced dead.”…..this means that Bannister’s phony claims of suctioning wine out of Hendrix for hours is fraudulent. Hendrix was taken to the morgue after he was pronounced dead, There goes the phony wine claim.
This old article clearly refutes the phony wine claims made up by Bannister in 1992 and the b.s. conspiracy theories that Buster is promoting. No wine talked about at all. Only drugs. If there was wine the police and ALL the doctors would’ve said it was wine on 9/18/70.
This phony wine theory can now be put to bed.
Incredibly well researched Jason. I stated I would not post again but I had to congratulate you on your work to further recognise Buster for what he truly is a fantasist. What Buster does not say about Dr Crompton is that he was the pathologist who worked on the Markov case the murder of the Bulgarian broadcaster who was able to detect the highly poisonous ricin. And where did he get the ridiculous suggestion that this highly respected and experienced pathologist would need to change his story. Just what or whom would he be protecting? You would think Dr Crompton would be able to know the difference between barbiturate intoxication and drowning by wine. Buster has changed the narrative in order to protect his waterboarding theory. It all just sounds false and phoney-a gigantic lie.
Thanks Ivana!
I said a few weeks ago if you research real Hendrix information these conspiracy theories will be easily debunked.
Well, according to Buster he claims every highly respected coroner or pathologist has been “gotten to” and has changed their findings. LOL. That’s his only defense to keep his conspiracy going. It’s very pathetic. Buster also changes his stories when it suits him. He has 4 fraud sources and fake quotes as his “evidence” but they all have been debunked. It seems to me he isn’t interested in learning about real evidence. He just wants to debate his phony theory using whatever nonsense he can think up in order to “win”. Real evidence refutes his nonsense no matter how hard he tries.
I saw those posts you told me about on the “crosstown” site and it looks just like Buster’s long winded rants on here. Same conspiracy junk with no proof or evidence. All theories and after the fact phony scenarios.
The main point in that 1970 article is there is nothing wine related at all. It only talks about drugs being the cause of death, which it was. And that was even before the autopsy was performed. The police, doctors, hospital spokesman all said drugs. Bannister, Brown, Siefert all said drugs in 1970 in that article. All this wine b.s. came in 1992 when Bannister started it. Then all those frauds wrote books adding to the conspiracy after.
I thought your posts were very insightful. I’m still going to post part 3 when i get a chance and do a couple of more including one about Jeffery. So check back in.
Looking forward to your further posts Jason. The truth always wins out.
Looking forward to reading your next posts Jason. The truth always triumphs.
(Welcome back again, as the final Part 3 of the “imbibed wine” myth is exposed as the total fraud that it is. To recap what you’ve read, we have Sharon Lawrence who made up the phony “imbibed wine” story for her book. She was clearly shown to be the fraud and the liar that she is. She expects us to believe that she would find out important information from a colleague regarding the death of Hendrix and not bother to report it until it “popped back into her head” for her fantasy book 31 years later. She also expects us to believe that UPI reporter Jack Meehan would refuse to do his job by reporting a major story he found out from a top coroner and only tell her in a passing moment. She also expects us to believe that a top coroner Dr. Gavin Thurston would refuse to perform his duty of documenting the major cause of death regarding Hendrix in his final autopsy report but only tell Meehan on the sly and nobody else. Sorry, we are not stupid and can see a phony claim like this from a mile away. Sharon Lawrence’s “imbibed wine” story is more phony than a 3 dollar bill. The fact is that there was never any “imbibed wine” in Hendrix since it was never documented or reported by anybody. When any famous person dies, all the details are provided in the autopsy and every reporter asks questions to report the information. It isn’t going to magically change for Jimi Hendrix where nobody says a word until Bannister’s phony 1992 claims surfaced. That’s why her story is a total fraud. And then we have kooks like Buster the clown who claims everybody was “gotten to” by Michael Jeffery forcing them to forge autopsy numbers cuz he was in British Intelligence to cover up the crime. Jeffery was never in any British Intelligence. That was another myth perpetrated by club owner turned record producer Malcolm Cecil Jeffery died in 1973, so all of this could have come out then, but it didn’t cuz there is no truth to it cuz it’s all a phony scam perpetrated by conspiracy theorists. Now It’s time to finish up this phony “imbibed wine” hoax in the final Part 3.)
“Debunking The Phony ‘Imbibed Wine’ Hendrix Myth And Why It’s A Joke”
Part Three
By Jason
Here is the final Part 3 that further exposes the fraud Sharon Lawrence and conspiracy theorists claim of “imbibed wine”. Common sense will prevail as well as scientific evidence that can’t be refuted. Without further ado, here is the final part 3 that ends this conspiracy theory garbage.
I wonder if these tin foil hatters have an image of Thurston sitting behind his desk talking with Meehan in 1970 both drinking tea and smoking cigarettes. Thurston would take a sip of tea, then a drag from his cigarette and say “I do say old chap, that Hendrix fellow was indeed imbibed with wine” as Meehan looks serious inhaling his menthol cigarette thinking about only telling Sharon Lawrence and nobody else in the press or citizens of the world. Just something to think about how ridiculous this whole thing is.
What you really need to do now, is not think of the present time in 2019 as Jimi Hendrix the legend who has been dead for almost 50 years. But now instead, you need to take a trip back to 1970 as Jimi Hendrix the International Superstar who just had died from a tragic drug overdose.
You had all the major news organizations with hundreds of reporters from around the world conviened in London to cover this major story of the death of Hendrix. All these reporters were sent to get the big story on how and why Hendrix died. Dr. Thurston was fielding questions from all these reporters and giving all of them the information he knew, so they could report it to their respective networks and publications.
So, are we as intelligent people to believe that Thurston wouldn’t tell any of these hundreds of reporters from around the world that Hendrix was “imbibed with wine” if he actually was? Are we also to believe that out of all these hundreds of reporters from around the world Dr. Thurston would only choose one obscure reporter (Jack Meehan) to tell this major breaking information to? As people are reading this, they are nodding their heads in agreement. They can see this phony “imbibed wine” story is a total joke made up by Sharon Lawrence that conspiracy theorists use for their phony murder claim.
It’s the number one job of a reporter to get a major scoop over anybody else and report that story before any rival can. So, Jack Meehan supposedly was told this major revelation of “imbibed wine” by Thurston himself (according to Sharon Lawrence) and he chose not to report this? Give me a friggin break.
News reporting was Meehan’s job and he only decided to tell Sharon Lawrence about it instead? Are you serious? No other colleague did he mention this story to. No mention of this story in the press by him. Only to Sharon Lawrence. And she never bothered to tell anyone for 31 years until she wrote it in a book? Give me a friggin break. You can see how this phony story doesn’t add up. It easy to see how Sharon Lawrence is a terrible liar making this whole thing up for her book. Both men are long dead and can’t confirm if it’s true. Sharon used the perfect sources as frauds do. Dead people who can’t talk.
There was no conversation of “imbibed wine” in 1970 by Thurston to Meehan. If there was, it would have been in the autopsy report by Thurston and reported by Meehan and by every other reporter covering the Hendrix death. It wouldn’t have been told to Lawrence by Meehan in passing moment as no big deal. This story by Lawrence is more fake than a 3 dollar bill.
Any reporter would kill for a story like this. This is major stuff. Meehan wouldn’t just decide not to print it and only tell a colleague instead. He would print the story and get rewarded for doing so. Other organisations would print and report it afterwards as it is done in the news business. This is why Sharon Lawrence’s “imbibed wine” story is all made up.
A famous coroner like Thurston wouldn’t just decide to tell one obscure reporter about a major finding in his case and not bother to tell the BBC or any other major worldwide or US media covering Hendrix. He certainly wouldn’t just forget to not add that major finding in his final report. This whole thing is a farce and is totally laughable. Even more so that morons actually believe it while parroting it as a major part of their conspiracy hoax.
Sharon Lawrence made up this fake “imbibed wine” quote in her book like all her other fake quotes she added for the reader. Common sense and scientific evidence refutes Sharon Lawrence and the tin foil hat conspiracy theorists who use this fake quote for their phony murder claim.
We know that there was no “imbibed wine” found in Jimi Hendrix cuz nothing on record offically states that there was. This means that there was never any conversation between Meehan and Thurston discussing “imbibed wine” in which Sharon Lawrence lies about in her book. Using two dead men where she can use a second hand quote and not having to provide any evidence for it is fraudulent. She quoted just a date she made up for when she claims the meeting happened in 1970. Sorry, that “evidence” is no good and does not hold up as legitimate when a dead man can confirm he had that conversation. No court in the world would enter her phony claim as admissible evidence.
Dr. Gavin Thurston began the Jimi Hendrix inquest on September 23, 1970. Thurston finished the inquest 5 days later on September 28th. Thurston concluded in his official documented findings that Hendrix had aspirated his own vomit and died of asphyxia while intoxicated with barbiturates. That was the final official conclusion of his final report. Thurston stated nothing about massive amounts of wine inside Hendrix or anything about Hendrix being “imbibed with wine”. This means that Sharon Lawrence is clearly lying about Thurston in her book. Thurston could never discuss something that he never found. That would be impossible. But in 2001 with phony wine claims from Bannister, it was easy for Lawrence to use two dead people for her phony claim that she used for a hook in her book. Lawrence lied under oath in court, so it’s easy for her to lie in a book.
Dr. Gavin Thurston recorded an open verdict citing “insufficient evidence of the circumstances”. Thurston officially stated, “The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication, but there is no evidence as to intention to commit suicide … If the question of intention cannot be answered, then it is proper to find the cause of death and leave it an open verdict.”
So, Thurston made very clear that Hendrix died due to barbiturate intoxication and never even mentioning anything about wine. Thurston never talked with Meehan about “imbibed wine” cuz there was never any massive amounts of wine in Hendrix. Also, for the conspiracy theorists who claim an open verdict was ruled cuz of a “Hendrix murder” is refuted by Thurston. The only reason it was left open was for the insufficient evidence of suicide. So, the phony “wine imbibed” claim and the phony murder theory has gone up in flames due to factual documented evidence with real forensic science that can’t be refuted.
Tin foil hatters can whine and cry all they want but they can’t refute the truth with their phony claims. I’m sure after reading this they will invent a brand new conspiracy since they need to keep it alive. But we all can say the phony “imbibed wine” quote from Sharon Lawrence is now dead and buried in the conspiracy theorists boneyard.
Here’s is all you need to know about this phony “imbibed wine story”. There was no “imbibed wine” described in Thurston’s final Hendrix autopsy report. If there was he would have entered it as evidence with his findings. Dr. Teare who did the Hendrix autopsy found no large amounts of wine in Hendrix. Not in his stomach or lungs. Teare only found vomit in his lungs from barbiturates. No evidence of drowning either. That would be obvious to Teare who did his examination.
Where was all that wine Bannister claimed existed in his 1992 claims to the present? Did it appear like magic when Bannister recalls how he saw Hendrix “flooded with wine” and then disappear when Teare did the autopsy? No wine found in the autopsy means no wine from their phony claims. Bannister wrote no reports about massive amounts of wine he claims he suctioned which by law he is required to do. He also did not preserve medical evidence of wine inside a body (which there was no wine) which he is by law required to do to have analyzed and tested. No written reports on the evidence of wine either which he is required to do. That means he is lying and there never was any wine. He has zero evidence or medical reports to back his phony claim in which he was required to have written for documentation.
The medical profession doesn’t operate on quotes from doctors. They document everything in a medical file. That’s why this Hendrix murder theory is a phony sham. Conspiracy theorists want you to believe all these incredible wine stories exist with no documentation. Sorry people, it doesn’t happen that way. When you go to the doctor do you only hear quotes from the last time you were there or does the doctor have a your medical file with everything documented inside it? Yeah, that’s what I thought and conspiracy theorists have no answer for that. Science and basic hospital procedures refutes these ridiculous wine claims from Wright, Bannister, and Lawrence as well as these conspiracy theorists who peddle them.
Jack Meehan would have reported what Thurston told him about “imbibed wine” if he actually told him. Reporting was his job. He wouldn’t just only tell Sharon Lawrence and nobody else. Dr. Thurston would have told this to every reporter who asked him “what happened to Hendrix”. He wouldn’t just choose Jack Meehan as the only reporter to tell this to. Sharon Lawrence has been caught in another lie and is guilty of making up another fake quote for her book.
So, to wrap up this phony “imbibed wine” story as Sharon Lawrence and conspiracy theorists tell it, we have a famous coroner in the UK (1970) who discovered a major finding of “imbibed wine” in Hendrix who chose not to include this revelation in his report nor tell any other reporter about it, but only an obscure reporter who decided not to print a major story but instead told a fellow colleague in passing who just happened to add this “startling information” in a 2001 book in which both dead men can’t confirm is true. What a crock. And sadly some stupid idiots believe this.
Thanks for reading along, and the next time you read that “Thurston told Jack Meehan that Hendrix was imbibed with wine” you can laugh out loud knowing Sharon Lawrence made up this phony second hand quote for her fantasy fairy tale book on Jimi Hendrix.
Buster offers up the same repeated excuses, conspiracy theories, and usual blathering nonsense on why he can’t produce evidence for his bogus claims. Another irate rant full of foul language and character attacks shows him to be off the rails. Buster is unable to successfully defend his conspiracy theory and his phony lying fraud sources. i just produced solid forensic evidence to debunk your phony claims. How come you can never produce anything besides a one sourced quote or a “private conversation” you claimed to have had where the person told you “incredible information” but was never officially on a public record?
BUSTER says: Jason isn’t too bright because he never stops to consider that we can’t find any record of that interview because Intel buried it.
Ah, Intel buried it. I should have guessed you would claim this for your usual excuse for why you cant produce any evidence. When you have no evidence for your phony claim, just blame Intel for it. lol.
Your lame “Intel buried it” excuse is ridiculous. Meehan was a reporter. All he had to do was go back to his office and write a major story. That was his job as a reporter. That’s what reporters do. They don’t get a major scoop and not report it. Your excuse is as lame as the phony “imbibed wine” story. It has been debunked.
BUSTER says: I’m absolutely positive that Sharon could provide verification for that interview.
BUSTER says: Jason isn’t too bright because he never stops to consider that we can’t find any record of that interview because Intel buried it.
So here we have another hilarious and fatal Buster contradiction. Buster claims he is “absolutely positive that Sharon could provide verification for that interview”. Then he says “we can’t find any record of that interview because Intel buried it:.Which is it? Is there verification or is it buried? So, Buster has no idea what he wants to claim in his irate rant..He claims there is evidence, but then he said there is no evidence cuz Intel buried it. It’s obvious that Buster just makes up stuff as he rants along not knowing what he is saying..
BUSTER says: He has already been informed that Sharon Lawrence could not have fabricated her story of Jack Meehan’s interview 31 years later and included specific dates…Remember Sharon was a reporter and friend of Jimi who was there and involved at the time.
Sharon Lawrence already fabricated stories in her book including this one. 31 years to finally make her “bold claim” in her book but never said a peep in 1970. Same thing with all your fraud sources, they all wait decades later to reveal “startling information” that they never told a breathing living soul about until they write a book. You are a sucker for tabloid journalism. Smart people are not.
BUSTER says: When we already answered him that Sharon was a reporter and obviously took notes of the most important story she would ever cover in her life that included the September 29th date of that interview, Jason ignores it and returns with his simple-minded screed.
I’ve already made perfectly clear for you and the readers that Sharon was a reporter. That was the basis of this whole series. You have a reading comprehension problem. So, you claim she took notes and came up with a date but she never bothered to report the most important story of her career. Sorry Buster, people aren’t stupid enough to believe that nonsense.
BUSTER says: Additionally, we already answered that if Jason could confront Sharon in person and tell her to her face she was a fantasizing liar who made up that account we would quickly see who was the pathetic troll and who was the real witness who told the truth…Sharon would rip this asshole Jason a new one and the public would quickly see a sick troll shown his proper place and made to look like the trolling nut he is…
Getting irate and using foul language isn’t going to make you present a better case for the public reading this. You are failing on all counts here.
Sharon is a fantasizing liar. She lied about where Jimi was born in her book. She made up fake quotes about Jimi’s mother. She lied about “imbibed wine. I would gladly ask her why she lied in her book. She wouldn’t be able to say a damn word. I don’t know why you are so irate when even you thought her book sucked. Why did you give her book a 1 Star Review on Amazon?
Buster says: “He’s lying”, “She’s a fraud” trolling asshole he is…What a strange coincidence that our resident demented troll Jason just so happens to be the person who figured out all the key witnesses to the murder were lying or making things up either to sell a book or for some other character flaw that Jason is the only person who accuses them of…Sorry Jason, but we’re not that stupid.
You’re stupid to use these liars as your sources. Your pal Bannister was convicted for 3 counts of fraud and lost his medical license. Sharon Lawrence committed felony perjury in a Toronto court. Tappy Wright admitted he lied in his book to sell copies of it. Aleem sued Janie Hendrix to steal Jimi’s guitars. These are all the fraud sources you choose to believe for your phony evidence. They have no solid proof. Only a fake story or a quote that supposedly someone told them. You know they are all liars but you use them as sources cuz it fits with your phony murder narrative. Then you become angry when it’s pointed out to you.
BUSTER says: What Jason doesn’t answer is the fact we have evidence that a cover-up was being perpetrated real-time as it happened…A responsible observer would realize there were some serious signs of corruption of the investigation in the Inquest not calling any of the medical witnesses and only dealing with a determination of whether Jimi committed suicide or not…It wasn’t a mistake that the two pro-Jeffery people, Gerry Stickells and Monika Dannemann, were the only two witnesses who were interviewed at the Inquest…It wasn’t a mistake that no time of death (a basic determination in any death case) was ever established or that the autopsist,
More conspiracy inventions made up by you in your mind. There was no corruption as you rant away nonsensically.
BUSTER says: Dr Teare, violated autopsy law by estimating a 100mg blood alcohol level at the time of ingestion of the pills…100mg is 5 glasses of wine – something the true timeline doesn’t have time to digest down to 5mg…But no one ever questioned the fact Teare was going by the false timeline told by Monika that was off by 6 hours…Teare even went back and tried to up the barbiturate level…These are serious red flags of corruption of the medical evidence towards a desired conclusion.
Now you are fraudulently accusing a top London pathologist of committing a felony by illegally adjusting autopsy numbers. Shamefully pathetic as your only excuse for your phony myth. i thought you would have a better story than this.
BUSTER says: You see Jason is a real piece of shit because he is aware of all this but is ignoring it in order to try and con you by sticking only to his idiotic “every one is lying” methodology…Anyone who responsibly looks at all the surrounding pertinent evidence will see right away that it points to corruption of the investigation by the authorities.
I’m aware that you are a kook making up total nonsense since all your phony theories have gone up in flames. Jimi died of a drug overdose. The only corruption exists in your mind.
BUSTER says: So once you understand that you quickly understand why Gavin Thurston never raised the full stomach of red wine issue at a forensic level and why Meehan never took his quote and pushed it in print…
There was never any red wine found in the autopsy. There were hundreds of reporters talking to Thurston and not one of them heard anything about this phony information you claim. This is a joke.
BUSTER says: Meehan died only 2 years after his witnessing.
Wrong Sherlock. Meehan died in September of 1973. That’s 3 years. You can’t even get that right and you’re supposed to be a big “authority” on Hendrix. He never witnessed anything.
BUSTER says: If there was no wine then why was Jimi covered in wine?…This wine that soaked Jimi and the murder scene was witnessed by Bob Brown and lied about by Dr Siefert (therefore more than confirming it)…Jason thinks he is getting away with ignoring Siefert being caught lying about the wine…That wine that was soaking Jimi was wine spilled in the process of drowning him with it – the majority of which did make it in to Jimi and was witnessed by Dr Bannister.
Jimi was not covered in wine. The ambulance men both testified to witnessing no wine at the flat where he died. Wine would have been there. They saw no wine spilled on Jimi or anywhere around him. They both testified to only seeing vomit. The police and the coroner’s officer who took the left over pills only saw vomit too.
You are a fraudulent liar. Bob Brown was at the hospital. He was never at no “murder scene”. Brown was never at the flat. Another lie made up by you in your irate post. You make up lies to spin your bogus theory.
BUSTER says: Jason also ignores that normal choking on vomit barbiturate deaths do not involve the unusual amount of vomit that was seen on Jimi by the ambulance men…That vomit was clearly the bodily reaction to a large amount of wine being poured in to Jimi and Jimi’s body reacting in one last brain stem survival surge…Jimi did not have enough barbiturate in him to cause that reaction in a person with his known tolerance…And he didn’t have enough time (a subject Jason conspicuously avoids)…
Same b.s. you spew to protect your fake theory. That is false and you have no idea what you’re talking about. Jimi took an overdose of pills. He took 9 pills plus a powerful amphetamine and drank wine during the evening. That’s what happens from an overdose, moron. Even John Saua the ambulance man knew it was an overdose cuz he’s seen it before many times. Blah, blah, blah spin your fake story all you want. it’s been refuted and your phony claims are ridiculous. The vomit sample taken from the death scene shows an overdose as does the official hospital and autopsy record. You have been debunked.
Jason is trying too hard to deny something that the length of his post and extent of his trolling effort belie a need to convince himself of something that is obviously unconsciously bothering him…Jason is just repeating the same trolling denial bullshit that we have already answered several times in this thread…Jason is a pathetic con man and weak troll who is only offering this lengthy denial script because he is trying to create an alternative viewpoint for the deniers to point to in order to ignore the real evidence…He has already been informed that Sharon Lawrence could not have fabricated her story of Jack Meehan’s interview 31 years later and included specific dates…Remember Sharon was a reporter and friend of Jimi who was there and involved at the time…Jason is just internet scum and has the balls to ask you to take his obvious make-it-up-as-he-goes-along trolling seriously…When we already answered him that Sharon was a reporter and obviously took notes of the most important story she would ever cover in her life that included the September 29th date of that interview, Jason ignores it and returns with his simple-minded screed…Additionally, we already answered that if Jason could confront Sharon in person and tell her to her face she was a fantasizing liar who made up that account we would quickly see who was the pathetic troll and who was the real witness who told the truth…Sharon would rip this asshole Jason a new one and the public would quickly see a sick troll shown his proper place and made to look like the trolling nut he is…I’m absolutely positive that Sharon could provide verification for that interview and quickly show Jason to be the crude “He’s lying”, “She’s a fraud” trolling asshole he is…What a strange coincidence that our resident demented troll Jason just so happens to be the person who figured out all the key witnesses to the murder were lying or making things up either to sell a book or for some other character flaw that Jason is the only person who accuses them of…Sorry Jason, but we’re not that stupid…What Jason doesn’t answer is the fact we have evidence that a cover-up was being perpetrated real-time as it happened…A responsible observer would realize there were some serious signs of corruption of the investigation in the Inquest not calling any of the medical witnesses and only dealing with a determination of whether Jimi committed suicide or not…It wasn’t a mistake that the two pro-Jeffery people, Gerry Stickells and Monika Dannemann, were the only two witnesses who were interviewed at the Inquest…It wasn’t a mistake that no time of death (a basic determination in any death case) was ever established or that the autopsist, Dr Teare, violated autopsy law by estimating a 100mg blood alcohol level at the time of ingestion of the pills…100mg is 5 glasses of wine – something the true timeline doesn’t have time to digest down to 5mg…But no one ever questioned the fact Teare was going by the false timeline told by Monika that was off by 6 hours…Teare even went back and tried to up the barbiturate level…These are serious red flags of corruption of the medical evidence towards a desired conclusion…You see Jason is a real piece of shit because he is aware of all this but is ignoring it in order to try and con you by sticking only to his idiotic “every one is lying” methodology…Anyone who responsibly looks at all the surrounding pertinent evidence will see right away that it points to corruption of the investigation by the authorities…So once you understand that you quickly understand why Gavin Thurston never raised the full stomach of red wine issue at a forensic level and why Meehan never took his quote and pushed it in print…Jason isn’t too bright because he never stops to consider that we can’t find any record of that interview because Intel buried it…Meehan died only 2 years after his witnessing…If there was no wine then why was Jimi covered in wine?…This wine that soaked Jimi and the murder scene was witnessed by Bob Brown and lied about by Dr Siefert (therefore more than confirming it)…Jason thinks he is getting away with ignoring Siefert being caught lying about the wine…That wine that was soaking Jimi was wine spilled in the process of drowning him with it – the majority of which did make it in to Jimi and was witnessed by Dr Bannister…Jason also ignores that normal choking on vomit barbiturate deaths do not involve the unusual amount of vomit that was seen on Jimi by the ambulance men…That vomit was clearly the bodily reaction to a large amount of wine being poured in to Jimi and Jimi’s body reacting in one last brain stem survival surge…Jimi did not have enough barbiturate in him to cause that reaction in a person with his known tolerance…And he didn’t have enough time (a subject Jason conspicuously avoids)…
Nice try Jason, but your simple stuff ain’t workin…
Sorry Buster. But this is all speculation masked as evidence. The fact remains that none of the doctors who treated Jimi stated anything about the wine. How could they since they only pounded Jimi’s heart for a few minutes. The autopsy revealed the real cause of death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. Since Jimi was fully clothed on top of the bed you could assume that death came swiftly. You have so far relied on Tappy Wright’s book as your main source and your “interview” with Bob Levine in order to produce your evidence. But these have been dismissed as lies as stated by both these people. So where exactly are you getting your waterboarding and other evidence from? The drowning in red wine was concocted by Tappy Wright with Dr Bannister and Sharon Lawrence jumping on the bandwagon years later. Dr. Brown never suggested murder and Dr Siefert did not lie. You are the one suggesting this. Jimi was covered in black and brown vomit as witnessed by the ambulance officers not red wine. Remember they were the first on the scene and what about the people at the Samarkand that morning I have read nothing about the red wine from them. Jimi went straight down to the morgue after casualty and I’m assuming the doctors did not try to clean his body in any way. This would be tampering with any evidence of cause of death. If wine had been poured over Jimi then this alone would have been highly visible to the person conducting the autopsy. Yet again no mention of it. You are re inventing the story here Buster and making innocent people look incredibly corrupt with your phoney story and attempting to ruin their reputations. When it is you who is the liar in all of this.
Buster offers up the same repeated excuses, conspiracy theories, and usual blathering nonsense on why he can’t produce evidence for his bogus claims. Another irate rant full of foul language and character attacks shows him to be off the rails. Buster is unable to successfully defend his conspiracy theory and his phony lying fraud sources. i just produced solid forensic evidence to debunk your phony claims. How come you can never produce anything besides a one sourced quote or a “private conversation” you claimed to have had where the person told you “incredible information” but was never officially on a public record?
BUSTER says: Jason isn’t too bright because he never stops to consider that we can’t find any record of that interview because Intel buried it.
Ah, Intel buried it. I should have guessed you would claim this for your usual excuse for why you cant produce any evidence. When you have no evidence for your phony claim, just blame Intel for it. lol.
Your lame “Intel buried it” excuse is ridiculous. Meehan was a reporter. All he had to do was go back to his office and write a major story. That was his job as a reporter. That’s what reporters do. They don’t get a major scoop and not report it. Your excuse is as lame as the phony “imbibed wine” story. It has been debunked.
BUSTER says: I’m absolutely positive that Sharon could provide verification for that interview.
BUSTER says: Jason isn’t too bright because he never stops to consider that we can’t find any record of that interview because Intel buried it.
So here we have another hilarious and fatal Buster contradiction. Buster claims he is “absolutely positive that Sharon could provide verification for that interview”. Then he says “we can’t find any record of that interview because Intel buried it:.Which is it? Is there verification or is it buried? So, Buster has no idea what he wants to claim in his irate rant..He claims there is evidence, but then he said there is no evidence cuz Intel buried it. It’s obvious that Buster just makes up stuff as he rants along not knowing what he is saying..
BUSTER says: He has already been informed that Sharon Lawrence could not have fabricated her story of Jack Meehan’s interview 31 years later and included specific dates…Remember Sharon was a reporter and friend of Jimi who was there and involved at the time.
Sharon Lawrence already fabricated stories in her book including this one. 31 years to finally make her “bold claim” in her book but never said a peep in 1970. Same thing with all your fraud sources, they all wait decades later to reveal “startling information” that they never told a breathing living soul about until they write a book. You are a sucker for tabloid journalism. Smart people are not.
BUSTER says: When we already answered him that Sharon was a reporter and obviously took notes of the most important story she would ever cover in her life that included the September 29th date of that interview, Jason ignores it and returns with his simple-minded screed.
I’ve already made perfectly clear for you and the readers that Sharon was a reporter. That was the basis of this whole series. You have a reading comprehension problem. So, you claim she took notes and came up with a date but she never bothered to report the most important story of her career. Sorry Buster, people aren’t stupid enough to believe that nonsense.
BUSTER says: Additionally, we already answered that if Jason could confront Sharon in person and tell her to her face she was a fantasizing liar who made up that account we would quickly see who was the pathetic troll and who was the real witness who told the truth…Sharon would rip this asshole Jason a new one and the public would quickly see a sick troll shown his proper place and made to look like the trolling nut he is…
Getting irate and using foul language isn’t going to make you present a better case for the public reading this. You are failing on all counts here.
Sharon is a fantasizing liar. She lied about where Jimi was born in her book. She made up fake quotes about Jimi’s mother. She lied about “imbibed wine. I would gladly ask her why she lied in her book. She wouldn’t be able to say a damn word. I don’t know why you are so irate when even you thought her book sucked. Why did you give her book a 1 Star Review on Amazon?
Buster says: “He’s lying”, “She’s a fraud” trolling asshole he is…What a strange coincidence that our resident demented troll Jason just so happens to be the person who figured out all the key witnesses to the murder were lying or making things up either to sell a book or for some other character flaw that Jason is the only person who accuses them of…Sorry Jason, but we’re not that stupid.
You’re stupid to use these liars as your sources. Your pal Bannister was convicted for 3 counts of fraud and lost his medical license. Sharon Lawrence committed felony perjury in a Toronto court. Tappy Wright admitted he lied in his book to sell copies of it. Aleem sued Janie Hendrix to steal Jimi’s guitars. These are all the fraud sources you choose to believe for your phony evidence. They have no solid proof. Only a fake story or a quote that supposedly someone told them. You know they are all liars but you use them as sources cuz it fits with your phony murder narrative. Then you become angry when it’s pointed out to you.
BUSTER says: What Jason doesn’t answer is the fact we have evidence that a cover-up was being perpetrated real-time as it happened…A responsible observer would realize there were some serious signs of corruption of the investigation in the Inquest not calling any of the medical witnesses and only dealing with a determination of whether Jimi committed suicide or not…It wasn’t a mistake that the two pro-Jeffery people, Gerry Stickells and Monika Dannemann, were the only two witnesses who were interviewed at the Inquest…It wasn’t a mistake that no time of death (a basic determination in any death case) was ever established or that the autopsist,
More conspiracy inventions made up by you in your mind. There was no corruption as you rant away nonsensically.
BUSTER says: Dr Teare, violated autopsy law by estimating a 100mg blood alcohol level at the time of ingestion of the pills…100mg is 5 glasses of wine – something the true timeline doesn’t have time to digest down to 5mg…But no one ever questioned the fact Teare was going by the false timeline told by Monika that was off by 6 hours…Teare even went back and tried to up the barbiturate level…These are serious red flags of corruption of the medical evidence towards a desired conclusion.
Now you are fraudulently accusing a top London pathologist of committing a felony by illegally adjusting autopsy numbers. Shamefully pathetic as your only excuse for your phony myth. i thought you would have a better story than this.
BUSTER says: You see Jason is a real piece of shit because he is aware of all this but is ignoring it in order to try and con you by sticking only to his idiotic “every one is lying” methodology…Anyone who responsibly looks at all the surrounding pertinent evidence will see right away that it points to corruption of the investigation by the authorities.
I’m aware that you are a kook making up total nonsense since all your phony theories have gone up in flames. Jimi died of a drug overdose. The only corruption exists in your mind.
BUSTER says: So once you understand that you quickly understand why Gavin Thurston never raised the full stomach of red wine issue at a forensic level and why Meehan never took his quote and pushed it in print…
There was never any red wine found in the autopsy. There were hundreds of reporters talking to Thurston and not one of them heard anything about this phony information you claim. This is a joke.
BUSTER says: Meehan died only 2 years after his witnessing.
Wrong Sherlock. Meehan died in September of 1973. That’s 3 years. You can’t even get that right and you’re supposed to be a big “authority” on Hendrix. He never witnessed anything.
BUSTER says: If there was no wine then why was Jimi covered in wine?…This wine that soaked Jimi and the murder scene was witnessed by Bob Brown and lied about by Dr Siefert (therefore more than confirming it)…Jason thinks he is getting away with ignoring Siefert being caught lying about the wine…That wine that was soaking Jimi was wine spilled in the process of drowning him with it – the majority of which did make it in to Jimi and was witnessed by Dr Bannister.
Jimi was not covered in wine. The ambulance men both testified to witnessing no wine at the flat where he died. Wine would have been there. They saw no wine spilled on Jimi or anywhere around him. They both testified to only seeing vomit. The police and the coroner’s officer who took the left over pills only saw vomit too.
You are a fraudulent liar. Bob Brown was at the hospital. He was never at no “murder scene”. Brown was never at the flat. Another lie made up by you in your irate post. You make up lies to spin your bogus theory.
BUSTER says: Jason also ignores that normal choking on vomit barbiturate deaths do not involve the unusual amount of vomit that was seen on Jimi by the ambulance men…That vomit was clearly the bodily reaction to a large amount of wine being poured in to Jimi and Jimi’s body reacting in one last brain stem survival surge…Jimi did not have enough barbiturate in him to cause that reaction in a person with his known tolerance…And he didn’t have enough time (a subject Jason conspicuously avoids)…
Same b.s. you spew to protect your fake theory. That is false and you have no idea what you’re talking about. Jimi took an overdose of pills. He took 9 pills plus a powerful amphetamine and drank wine during the evening. That’s what happens from an overdose, moron. Even John Saua the ambulance man knew it was an overdose cuz he’s seen it before many times. Blah, blah, blah spin your fake story all you want. it’s been refuted and your phony claims are ridiculous. The vomit sample taken from the death scene shows an overdose as does the official hospital and autopsy record. You have been debunked.
Jason here we go again. All the people who do not believe Buster’s story are all dishonest and covering things up. Any attempt by the doctors to cover up the real cause of Jimi’s death would be considered medical negligence and they would lose their medical licenses. Why on earth would they risk that?. The fact is that none of the medical specialists stated the red wine caused Jimi’s death back in 1970. Now Buster uses medical jargon to further inflate his nonsense. The time of death could not be stated with any certainty was because Jimi had been dead for quite a while before the ambulance was called. Jimi was brought into causality and one of the doctors pounded his heart as a mere formality in order to establish a time of death. Buster’ s use of derogatory language towards any of his opponents is a ploy to make himself look like an authority on this subject but in reality all of his ramblings look like fairytales. What is even more disturbing to me is that Buster wants to believe more in Jimi dying a violent death by waterboarding rather than passing away in his sleep. This makes Jimi look like a passive victim surrounded by evil people with criminal intentions all of whom were willing to change their stories after being coerced. A true conspiracy theory con. Jason I appreciate any well researched material founded in reality rather than Buster’s rants founded in deception and distortion of the facts.
Ivana, Buster isn’t even sure of his own conspiracies. It changes with each comment he leaves.
He supports Tappy Wright’s claim of a forced drowning where he posted it several times. Then he changes his story when he tries to argue with me saying that “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”. Can you believe that? His quotes are below. That is true trolling as far as I’m concerned.
He also changes his “murder theory”. Claims Jeffery killed Hendrix himself and after I proved Jeffery was in Spain he then says “Jeffery arranged the murder”. Just total nonsense as he changes his whole theory.
Same thing with the wine he can’t prove. Claims everybody was “gotten to” and was forging autopsy numbers at Jeffery’s request. Then he claims a “hard cork of vomit” prevented the ambulance men from witnessing any wine and they had to rush him to the hospital to get it removed. So, Buster is now suggesting Hendrix was still alive. You can’t have a discussion with someone who changes and makes up brand new theories on the fly.
That is deeply disturbing he wants to believe that.
Buster wants us to forget about all the actual events on Sept. 18, 1970 and only talk about phony wine claims and quotes post 1992 from all the fraudsters. Not one doctor said anything about wine on that day. All the news reports went into detail about Jimi passing away from an overdose. And if there was all this “gallons of wine” it would have been confirmed on that day. Not one medical record shows any wine. Only Bannister talking wine in 1992. You’re right, no doctor would cover anything up back then. You know why? Not any of them even knew who Jimi was then. Actually, Bannister lost his medical license for fraud in 1992 right after he made his phony wine claim so he is not credible.
Siefert saw no wine but Buster takes what he said and adds his own words to it. Not one doctor said Jimi was drowned in wine in 1970. They issued the statement that it was an overdose. That’s all you need to know. Buster’s lies and his fairy tale theories are ridiculous. When they are exposed as nonsense, he calls you a troll and swears at you lol.
Jason I am looking forward to your piece on Michael Jeffrey. We both established quite earlier on that Michael was in Spain when he supposedly was in Notting Hill waterboarding Jimi. But Buster still clings to this debunked myth as though his life depended on it. Instead of backing down he concocts further fallacies to protect his theories. I asked him several times to produce his sources but to no avail. I also wanted to know who exactly murdered Jimi since Michael Jeffrey was in Spain and Tappy Wright admitted his story was made up in order to sell his book. Maybe Buster should consult Agents Scully and Mulder from the FBI/X Files. LOL.
Haha he totally should. Maybe Buster can find the missing and imaginary wine he claims.
We did establish Jeffery was in Spain, but then Buster changed his theory to “Jeffery arranged Jimi’s murder”.
Buster has no sources except for phony quotes and claims that have been debunked or are too ridiculous to even believe.
Buster now contradicts himself stating a “forced drowning” and then he says “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”. Which theory does he actually want to claim?
My Jeffery series won’t be written for a little while. I’m doing some research and found some information that will be useful. I have a new series before Jeffery that will be a really good read.
Ivana is obviously a troll who just learned about this from this thread and is now talking down to what is probably one of the world’s top experts on the subject…It’s silly and bespeaks a lack of moderation…
Ivana falsely states that my input is all speculation…Actually, if anyone looks at the content of this thread my input is all verified fact taken directly from the record and main witnesses…Ivana is enjoying her denial trolling a little too much but anyone who reads the debate above will see Ivana evades the direct facts she calls for each and every time and responds with evasive generalities exactly because she can’t honestly answer the evidence she calls for when it is shown…If Ivana bothered to specifically detail what she thought was speculation we would quickly see it isn’t and the reason she avoids discussing the individual points of evidence is exactly because they aren’t speculation and she can’t credibly answer them directly…She’s accusing us of what she is guilty of and is being allowed to get away with it…
Ivana is ignoring proof above…We have proven by the hospital record is that Jimi was entered on that written hospital report as being attended to from 11:45 to 12:15…That’s a full half hour…Even though we have proven Dr Siefert was caught lying about the wine Ivana chooses to ignore it and quote him saying they only treated Jimi for a few minutes…I am a personal acquaintance of Dr Bannister and he directly witnessed 5 bottles of wine inside Jimi…Our ballsy internet troll Ivana ignores this and trolls “No doctor witnessed any wine in Jimi”…She also uncredibly ignores that the hospital record evidences the 20 minute removal of the wine and 10 minute resuscitation attempt in its recorded half hour of treatment…If there was no wine in Jimi what did they spend a half hour doing?…This is a moderation issue at this point…
Ivana falsely says death came quickly from the barbiturate…Only she grants herself the right to ignore Caesar Glebbeek’s documented Underwriter’s Laboratories case histories for Vesparax and the fact they prove doses that were 10 to 15 tablets (1 to 6 more pills than Jimi took) never killed in less than 4 hours…She also moronically doesn’t compute her own claim that Jimi died at 5:30am…This is correct, but dealing at the simple-minded level Ivana fails to consider that her own admitted time of death means Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 to 2 hours – meaning the science shown by Glebbeek precludes any quick death within those time parameters…It is clear to any intelligent analyzer of this business that the overseeing authorities were also aware of this fact and that is why they did a minimal investigation that avoided these fatal incriminations…Yes, Jimi died a quick death – only the means was forced drowning in wine as all the evidence Ivana is idiotically in contempt of shows…Lacking any knowledge or intellect, Ivana deals with all this highly intelligent evidence by hand-waving that I am “trying to use medical jargon”…Ivana is an idiot and she should not be allowed to insult the intelligence of the readers or myself…Yes, I am trying to use medical jargon…And if you bothered to intelligently process what it says it proves murder…
Ivana also seems to have reality issues over the fact we have documented proof that Dr Siefert lied…He is on video saying “Jimi was covered in red wine” and then when Tappy’s book came out Glebbeek quoted him as saying “I detected no alcohol on Jimi”…Ivana is a liar because we have this written in stone as far as documentation…
I have to protest that the website has turned the thread over to trolling hooligans who are not being forced to answer for the serious defects in their arguments and methods…Or the correct evidence…It is obvious to any credible intelligent person that they are just here for the denial trolling…
BUSTER says: September 7, 2019
Yes, Jimi died a quick death – only the means was forced drowning in wine as all the evidence Ivana is idiotically in contempt of shows.
BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
I have to protest that Buster can’t keep his own theory straight.
Today, Buster says that Jimi was “forced drowned in wine”. That has been his major argument. Then on August 22 he claims that “no one would need to force wine into Jimi” when he was trying to argue with me. That is the total opposite of his major claim. See how he changes his story each comment?
It is impossible to have an honest discussion with a person who just changes his story each time just as an attempt to change the narrative. That is trolling as far as I’m concerned. Someone who changes his story every other post is not a serious poster.
BUSTER says: I have to protest that the website has turned the thread over to trolling hooligans who are not being forced to answer for the serious defects in their arguments and methods…Or the correct evidence…It is obvious to any credible intelligent person that they are just here for the denial trolling.
Where is it written that everybody has to agree with your claims and if they don’t they are trolling? Your theory has the serious defects. Full of myths, unconfirmed quotes, lies, innuendos, made up conspiracies, outrageous claims with no documentation or proof. I’ve provided forensic facts and solid evidence that you argue against with no facts or evidence. So, produce some evidence. Where is the documentation of all this wine you claim?
Only a clinically stupid person would dare make the argument you just made Jason and think he scored a point…The word “forced” in this context can be legitimately used whether the person is conscious or not since no unconscious person voluntarily cooperates with being drowned by having bottles of wine poured down their throat…But even worse, you answer with this idiotic attempt to force spurious semantics when you failed to answer the original point in what you are quoting…You never answered the point that was being made in that original quote where Jimi’s .7mg blood barbiturate level meant he was unconscious and therefore there would be no signs of trauma, as you falsely claimed but were too stupid to realize the forensic evidence disproved…So you are only doubling down on your original offense while stupidly failing to realize you are only exposing your total ineptitude and failure…You’re an unqualified fool if you publicly think that idiotic and logically incorrect desperate forcing of semantics overturns any of the rest of the evidence you are publicly using it to avoid…You’re obviously an unintelligent troll and your material isn’t fooling any serious, intelligent readers…You busted above from the sheer stupidity of what you write and its idiotic defiance of the intelligent information I discussed…Free speech is important but in any credibly overseen intellectual contest it must be accompanied with a credible evaluation of its merit and worthiness in order to perform productive debate with a credible outcome…Sorry Jason but credible opinion is not automatically granted in such contests, it is earned and you have used up your free speech time here and ventured in to uncredibleness…This is proven by the fact you go from our clearly referenced and detailed evidence and arguments to name-calling and nay-saying instead of credibly answering the valid material you are being shown…That type of method doesn’t live up to things like Jimi having a collapsed lung because it was flooded by wine it wasn’t designed to hold and collapsed when the emergency room doctors desperately tried to remove the wine that was in it at St Mary’s…Since you avoided every single detailed point of evidence I described in my last post and once again reverted to your childish “everyone is lying” stupidity I’ll take that as the concession it is and refrain from any further responses to you since at this point you are now an unmoderated gutter troll waiting for just moderator disposal…
Hi Jason Buster says Dr Bannister witnessed five bottles of wine inside of Jimi but how exactly did he witness these since he was not the one performing the autopsy? There was no suctioning performed on Jimi in casualty as Jimi was clearly dead. Suctioning is done only in an attempt to save a life. The ambulance officers performed what was expected of them at the Samarkand. Jimi was wheeled into casualty where the doctors pounded his heart as a mere formality only in order to establish a time of death as there was no one about to ask at the hotel. Jimi had the tell signs of someone who had been dead for quite a while. The coroner ‘s report states that Jimi had 400ml of free fluid in the left lung and vomited material could be expressed from the left bronchi. Dr Teare clearly states in his report that Jimi died of inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. So where exactly did Dr Bannister get the five bottles of red wine scenario from? The alcohol level in Jimi’s urine was 46 mgs which I think suggests that Jimi took the Vesparax with the red wine. The ED doctors’ report would have clearly noted the copious amounts of wine oozing from Jimi in casualty and these would have had to have been passed on to Dr Teare as an unusual occurrence. But no such report has ever materialised. Jason can you image trying to resuscitate or work on someone who had been dead for hours like Jimi was. No doctor would even attempt this in casualty.
This is ridiculous.
BUSTER says: Only a clinically stupid person would dare make the argument you just made Jason and think he scored a point…
I’m not here to score points. I just want an honest discussion in which you’re incapable of. You make contradictig claims and when I point that out you get angry.
BUSTER says: The word “forced” in this context can be legitimately used whether the person is conscious or not since no unconscious person voluntarily cooperates with being drowned by having bottles of wine poured down their throat…
So, was Jimi conscious or unconscious? Each post you change claiming he was either conscious or unconscious depending on what you attempt to argue. You claim in one post he was “forced drowned” and in the next you say he wasn’t. We can’t have an honest discussion when you do that. Your contradiction below.
BUSTER says: September 7, 2019
Y.es, Jimi died a quick death – only the means was forced drowning in wine as all the evidence Ivana is idiotically in contempt of shows.
BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
Here is your blatant contradiction. One post you claim he was “forced drowned” and the next you say he wasn’t. You are angry cuz I posted your contradiction.
BUSTER says: But even worse, you answer with this idiotic attempt to force spurious semantics when you failed to answer the original point in what you are quoting…You never answered the point that was being made in that original quote where Jimi’s .7mg blood barbiturate level meant he was unconscious and therefore there would be no signs of trauma, as you falsely claimed but were too stupid to realize the forensic evidence disproved…
You believe Tappy Wright’s phony claim that “Michael Jeffery stuffed pills in Jimi’s mouth and then forced wine down his windpipe. Hendrix would not be unconscious when pills were being stuffed in his mouth forced with wine. The pills would have been still in his mouth. You are making up a brand new theory for your claim. Also, there would have been signs of a violent struggle in that scenario.
If Jimi was “forced drowned” as you claim, there would be trauma associated with that. It would have shown up in the autopsy and it did not. Teare found no evidence of Hendrix being drowned in wine in the actual forensics. You are clearly ignorant switching theories when one of yours fails. You are also ignorant of the word “forensic”.
BUSTER says: So you are only doubling down on your original offense while stupidly failing to realize you are only exposing your total ineptitude and failure…You’re an unqualified fool if you publicly think that idiotic and logically incorrect desperate forcing of semantics overturns any of the rest of the evidence you are publicly using it to avoid.
I’m stating the facts, man. It’s not my fault you can’t understand basic medical science.
BUSTER says: You’re obviously an unintelligent troll and your material isn’t fooling any serious, intelligent readers…You busted above from the sheer stupidity of what you write and its idiotic defiance of the intelligent information I discussed…Free speech is important but in any credibly overseen intellectual contest it must be accompanied with a credible evaluation of its merit and worthiness in order to perform productive debate with a credible outcome…
You haven’t discussed any intelligent information. Only theories and invalid claims that doesn’t add up. And once again, you get angry that I don’t subscribe to your theory.
BUSTER says: Sorry Jason but credible opinion is not automatically granted in such contests, it is earned and you have used up your free speech time here and ventured in to uncredibleness…
I’ve posted solid facts and shown that you contradict yourself. Used up my free speech? Sounds like a threat. I have the free speech to post here as well as you do.
BUSTER says: This is proven by the fact you go from our clearly referenced and detailed evidence and arguments to name-calling and nay-saying instead of credibly answering the valid material you are being shown…
You’re calling me names like a “troll” “scum” and using foul language directed at me.
BUSTER says: That type of method doesn’t live up to things like Jimi having a collapsed lung because it was flooded by wine it wasn’t designed to hold and collapsed when the emergency room doctors desperately tried to remove the wine that was in it at St Mary’s…
There was no wine ever documented at St. Mary Abbot Hospital on 9/18/70. So there was no lungs ever flooded with wine. Only in 1992 did Bannister claim wine.
BUSTER says: Since you avoided every single detailed point of evidence I described in my last post and once again reverted to your childish “everyone is lying” stupidity I’ll take that as the concession it is and refrain from any further responses to you since at this point you are now an unmoderated gutter troll waiting for just moderator disposal.
I pointed out that all your sources are confirmed liars. And they are. Bannister was convicted for fraud. Lawrence lied where Hendrix was born. Wright admitted he lied in his book. What about that don’t you understand?
You are threatening me to be disposed of? I have every right to post here as Justin already stated. You are angry cuz your claims have been proven false and I pointed out your contradiction.
Ivana, that is exactly the point. Bannister himself said Hendrix was already dead when he arrived at the hospital. He said he was “cold, dead, and blue” and any attempt to revive him was “merely a formality”. So, how can that change to half hour resuscitation attempts with gallons of wine? He said nothing about wine on 9/18/70, wrote no reports about wine, not one bottle of wine kept as evidence. Bannister would be required by law to document everything he witnessed and performed and removed. No report on wine, no record of half hour wine surging resuscitation attempts, and no evidence of 5 bottles of wine removed. He would have to preserve the wine and send it off to Teare to be analyzed. Bannister later claimed that “he dumped the wine out”. Yeah right. And he was the official doctor who pronounced Hendrix dead and wrote the statement to the press that it was “a drug overdose”. Why didn’t he say wine in 1970 when he claimed wine in 1992? There was no wine on 9/18/70.
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality” – Doctor Bannister
So, Bannister said nothing about wine or half hour wine surging resuscitation attempts. It was only a formality and that checks out with what Siefert said. Then we get “gallons of wine” in 1992. Ridiculous.
Jason – there is no point in arguing with your hot air-based evasive trolling…I agree with Scott Thompson that Justin is responsible here because he has given equal opportunity to someone who is obviously a lying piece of shit internet troll and may be an internet intelligence agent…Your point that my saying Jimi was force-drowned is a contradiction is idiotic and shows a demented lack of credible reasoning, and is frankly proof of your desperation to deny on the flimsiest of grounds…Jimi was incapacitated by the .7mg of barbiturate found in his blood at the autopsy and the people who murdered him did not have much resistance because of it…What is becoming clear here is Monika was involved and probably let the murderers in…So they probably waited until the pills took effect and then came in to pour the wine down Jimi’s throat when he couldn’t resist…So while you are focusing on trolling semantics I am focusing on the critical forensic evidence and what it shows…Any intelligent person who reads this discussion can see you strategically fail to answer the substance of what is being said and return with a load of denial fodder that is just you riffing sloppy regressive BS in response to evidence you aren’t adequately answering…The bottom line is the .7mg barbiturate level your answers conspicuously avoid proves Jimi was not able to resist when they forced the wine down his throat…Your trolling bullshit and pretend indignation in response to this correct information is beneath the required level of credible input this discussion requires and serious posters should not be subjected to it…The only violation here is you failed to answer for your false claim that there would be signs of trauma…
I noticed your reply omitted any answer to the fact the St Mary’s hospital record evidenced a treatment period of a half hour for Jimi before they gave up and quit…I asked you if there was no wine then what did they spend a half hour doing on Jimi if he was dead?…You avoided that because you dishonestly knew your demented trolling couldn’t get you around that one…The written hospital report says they treated Jimi from 11:45 to 12:15…They then formally declared death at 12:45…Despite your blathering trolling we have proven the wine in Dr Siefert’s obvious lie and the fact Scotland Yard avoided seeking-out and interviewing the nurses who could have witnessed it…Jimi was a political assassination and the British government continued its original complicity by not asking the nurses whose answer they already knew…Jason is lying scum who knows that the hospital record precisely shows the 20 minutes for the removal of the wine Dr Bannister told me of in person plus the 10 minute failed resuscitation attempt once they cleared the unusual volume of wine…He knows it and that’s why this filthy troll Jason avoided answering it…
Jimi’s lung was collapsed because the lungs are not designed to be forced to the hilt with thicker-than-water wine…This bulging of thick fluid along with the forceful suctioning of the lungs caused Jimi’s lung to collapse…I’ll bet if we consulted medical experts they would say normal choking on vomit victims do not experience collapsed lungs…This is just more subtle evidence that once again points in the direction of a forced drowning with wine death…When Flyswatter originally mentioned it Jason ignored him too…
Last night Albert Allen was on a radio show in Chicago telling of his witnessing of Monika Dannemann being in cahoots with Jeffery…You can tell by his voice he’s telling the truth…It’s only silly internet trolls who say otherwise…
Buster repeats the same debunked claims over and over.
BUSTER says: Jason – there is no point in arguing with your hot air-based evasive trolling…I agree with Scott Thompson that Justin is responsible here because he has given equal opportunity to someone who is obviously a lying piece of shit internet troll and may be an internet intelligence agent…Your point that my saying Jimi was force-drowned is a contradiction is idiotic and shows a demented lack of credible reasoning, and is frankly proof of your desperation to deny on the flimsiest of grounds…Jimi was incapacitated by the .7mg of barbiturate found in his blood at the autopsy and the people who murdered him did not have much resistance because of it…What is becoming clear here is Monika was involved and probably let the murderers in…So they probably waited until the pills took effect and then came in to pour the wine down Jimi’s throat when he couldn’t resist…So while you are focusing on trolling semantics I am focusing on the critical forensic evidence and what it shows…Any intelligent person who reads this discussion can see you strategically fail to answer the substance of what is being said and return with a load of denial fodder that is just you riffing sloppy regressive BS in response to evidence you aren’t adequately answering…The bottom line is the .7mg barbiturate level your answers conspicuously avoid proves Jimi was not able to resist when they forced the wine down his throat…Your trolling bullshit and pretend indignation in response to this correct information is beneath the required level of credible input this discussion requires and serious posters should not be subjected to it…The only violation here is you failed to answer for your false claim that there would be signs of trauma…
Buster, just admit you blew it and contradicted your original forced wine drowning claim. You got Busted. And now you look like a clown trying to defend it switching your own theory making up total lies.
Your whole phony claim is based on Tappy Wright’s story that Hendrix was forced fed pills that was washed down forcibly with bottles of wine. Tappy Wright never stated in his claim that Hendrix was incapacitated with pills first and then had wine poured down his throat. This is your brand new b.s. claim you just came up with on the fly cuz I refuted your b.s. with scientific facts. So, now you just debunked Tappy Wright’s claim and that is the same theory you were promoting. So, with your new claim of “Hendrix being incapacitated with pills first”, you are calling Tappy Wright and yourself a liar for promoting that claim. Congratulations!
When a person is drowned in “5 bottles of wine”, as you claim Jimi was, there will be signs of trauma of a drowning victim. There would be evidence left behind to show that in the autopsy. None was ever found. Are you that ignorant of the nature of the human body? You think a person could be drowned in gallons of wine and there would be no damage left behind? What a moron. Your phony quotes and claims are refuted by science and the human body.
BUSTER says: Jimi was incapacitated by the .7mg of barbiturate found in his blood at the autopsy and the people who murdered him did not have much resistance because of it…What is becoming clear here is Monika was involved and probably let the murderers in…So they probably waited until the pills took effect and then came in to pour the wine down Jimi’s throat when he couldn’t resist.
Where did you come up with this b.s. claim Buster? Nobody has ever made a claim like this. This is your own b.s. spinning a new theory on the fly. It is pathetic and hilarious. Tappy Wright never made a claim that Hendrix was incapacitated first with pills.
“We went round to Monika’s hotel room, got a handful of pills and stuffed them into his mouth…then poured a few bottles of red wine deep into his windpipe.” – Tappy Wright’s phony Michael Jeffery quote.
Your pal Tappy said nothing about Hendrix being incapacitated with pills first. He said pills were stuffed into his mouth and then the wine was poured. Why are you trying to claim the opposite now, Buster? This quote is phony anyway since there would have been a violent struggle. Hendrix wouldn’t allow people to force pills and wine into him. He would have fought them off. He would have had cuts, bruises, and broken teeth.
BUSTER says: I noticed your reply omitted any answer to the fact the St Mary’s hospital record evidenced a treatment period of a half hour for Jimi before they gave up and quit.
I noticed that you have a severe reading comprehension problem or some other issues going on. I’ve stated several times that there in no St. Mary Abbots Hospital record for Jimi Hendrix with documentation of wine removal in a half hour attempt to save his life. Hendrix was dead on arrival. What about that don’t you understand? Doctors don’t spend a half hour working on a man who’s been dead for 5 hours. I even quoted your pal Bannister stating it was only a formality. But you repeat this same b.s. over and over.
BUSTER says: I asked you if there was no wine then what did they spend a half hour doing on Jimi if he was dead?…You avoided that because you dishonestly knew your demented trolling couldn’t get you around that one…The written hospital report says they treated Jimi from 11:45 to 12:15…They then formally declared death at 12:45.
What do you mean “If he was dead”?
Jimi was already dead when he was taken to the hospital. Jimi was already dead at the flat. Ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua both testified he was dead at the flat. Bannister said he was dead on arrival in his official statement. Siefert said he was dead. That’s why he only worked on Jimi for a few minutes. Sounds like you’re trying to change your story again suggesting Jimi was still alive during that phony half hour treatment you claim. You change your stories from one post to the next to fit your phony narrative. That is called trolling.
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – Doctor Bannister
Your pal Bannister refutes your phony claim and his post 1992 claims with his previous statement. Here he said Hendrix was dead on arrival. The attempt was ‘merely a formality’. A formality is not a half hour attempt. Bannister agrees with Dr Siefer that the attempt only lasted a few minutes. There was no 20 minute wine draining followed by a resuscitation attempt. Sorry, Buster the clown.
BUSTER says: Despite your blathering trolling we have proven the wine in Dr Siefert’s obvious lie and the fact Scotland Yard avoided seeking-out and interviewing the nurses who could have witnessed it…Jimi was a political assassination and the British government continued its original complicity by not asking the nurses whose answer they already knew…Jason is lying scum who knows that the hospital record precisely shows the 20 minutes for the removal of the wine Dr Bannister told me of in person plus the 10 minute failed resuscitation attempt once they cleared the unusual volume of wine…He knows it and that’s why this filthy troll Jason avoided answering it…
You haven’t proven anything. Bannister agrees with Siefert in his above statement and said not a damn thing about wine. Now you spin your phony made up b.s. conspiracy with no facts or proof. Not one doctor or nurse said anything about wine on 9/18/70. Bannister didn’t make his phony wine claim until after 1992. You are lying about Bannister since that never happened. There is nothing on the official record to prove that it did. There is only post 1992 claims from Bannister and that is impossible when the official record doesn’t state it.
BUSTER says: Jimi’s lung was collapsed because the lungs are not designed to be forced to the hilt with thicker-than-water wine…This bulging of thick fluid along with the forceful suctioning of the lungs caused Jimi’s lung to collapse…I’ll bet if we consulted medical experts they would say normal choking on vomit victims do not experience collapsed lungs…This is just more subtle evidence that once again points in the direction of a forced drowning with wine death…When Flyswatter originally mentioned it Jason ignored him too…
Dr. Teare stated Jimi had a ‘partially collapsed’ left lung so quit trying to exaggerate your phony claims.
BUSTER says: Last night Albert Allen was on a radio show in Chicago telling of his witnessing of Monika Dannemann being in cahoots with Jeffery…You can tell by his voice he’s telling the truth…It’s only silly internet trolls who say otherwise.
LOL. Hearing his voice on a radio show doesn’t comfirm he “telling the truth”, evidence does,,and he doesn’t have any. Allen has only a story and a claim with no evidence. No court or judge would accept only Allen’s “voice” as evidence as proof of truth. Only you would, since you promote fake conspiracies with no evidence. That is Hilarious!
Well said Jason. I have a real issue with Dr Bannister’s account of that morning. He says that Jimi was an unusually tall man but by Noel Redding’s account Jimi was of average height. In 1993 the “good doctor” said that his medical staff and not him personally used a metal tube to unblock the airways but it kept filling up with wine from the stomach. Then in 1995 he changed his story saying there was no obstruction of the airways and instead the lungs were full of wine. Of course this all contradicts what really happened in casualty that morning. Like we both said in earlier posts the gallons of wine story came only from Bannister and the ambulance officers, who were the first on the scene, saw black and brown vomit only. The highly experienced Dr. Teare who performed autopsies on other high profile people said nothing about red wine as cause of death. If Dr Bannister withheld this information back in 1970 it would have been medical misconduct.
That’s why these claims are not believable Ivana. Not a single word of wine mentioned on 9/18/70 and during the inquest.
“The Grandfather of Wine” ex Doctor Bannister said ” he never saw so much wine in his life” and he wouldn’t say anything about it until 1992 after he read Electric Gypsy? All these opportunists never said a peep about all their wild stories until they started writing all their books, then it became important. Why were they all silent in 1970 if what they are claiming is true? At least one of them was bound to say something about it. But nope. Nobody.
Bannister has contradicted himself each time he opens his mouth for an interview. He claims he has all these “vivid memories” but can’t even place the real Jimi Hendrix. Like you said, he claimed Jimi was ‘unusually tall’ and thought he was “naked” when he was brought in. Jones and Saua said he was fully clothed. They never saw any wine at the flat but Bannister claims he was soaked in it. And Bannister is the only one to claim “5 bottles of wine in the lungs”. Siefert and Brown never saw wine in the lungs. He claimed a full medical staff worked on Jimi for a half hour, then only himself, then had obstruction of airways and then a drowning of it. Why would a full medical staff be working on Jimi when he first said it was only a formality? Phony claims from a convicted fraud Doctor who lost his medical license for fraud. And this is the main witness they use for their evidence. lol
Buster, if you don’t like it here, I would encourage you to move on and to start your own website. No one is forcing you to be here…
I support and maintain this website. It is the same as a living room in my home. I would not allow someone to come into my living room and tell me what to do or to try and provoke me. And I will not accept it here either. This is not your living room and you are not making the rules here about who is welcome and who is not… I have made it quite clear that I am not going to ban anyone that happens to hold an opposing view. So, stop needling me and trying to get me to ban voices that you don’t like.
As you yourself have complained about, you have been banned from every other mainstream Jimi Hendrix site. So, the hypocrisy displayed in your eagerness to have me ban others is certainly distasteful.
With all due respect Justin you show extremely bad judgment in defending what are obviously two unserious trolls who post credulous material…No matter how you describe your approach to oversight, reality dictates that any website, no matter how it is run, is objectively judged by its content…You might have your view of how you run your website but there is a bigger, broader “living room” here that is beyond your control and your ability to have the final word on and that is the perspective from which I come…Everyone has a point at which they judge and discriminate…I mean at what point would you block or ban content?…I assume you would not allow someone to post graphic porno or crazy abusive posts that were only meant to disturb the site?…So you would intervene at some point in order to maintain a basic level of reasonable order…
I think most people would agree that you make a very foolish mistake defending Jason and Ivana because anyone with any normal understanding of the subject and sense of credible argument would see both Ivana and Jason are not arguing seriously and are not making any effort to honestly admit evidence…I mean I assume the purpose of this space is to establish the best understanding of the facts behind Jimi’s death and do so in an intelligent and credible manner…There is no reasonably intelligent honest person who evaluated Jason’s and Ivana’s input who would say they were making a sincere effort to recognize the facts or honestly interpret where they lead…So we are not talking a valid, reasonable “opposing view” in the case of Jason and Ivana…We are talking two malicious posters who are not here for honest purposes whose content and method is not being properly screened and have been allowed to radically lower the quality of conversation on this site…I myself would not foolishly allow vandals to enter my living room…Persons who had no sincere intent to be good guests…I mean a serious University symposium does not open its doors to hooligans on the basis of free speech nor should any website that attempts serious discussion of Jimi’s death allow obvious trolls…
Justin, the problem here is not persons trying to use banning to silence opposing viewpoints…The problem is the credibility and quality of argument of those posters is not being reasonably evaluated…I don’t know if you are reading these comments but Jason and Ivana are getting away with ignoring provable facts and responding with crude nay-saying to evidence they are failing to answer…I mean I am objectively the person who has literally provided the best case of evidence for Jimi’s murder anyone ever did on the internet or anywhere else…It seems bizarre to me that you would speak of me that way, considering, or use it to defend two obvious frauds like Jason and Ivana…
If you knew the true injustice of my being banned from those sites you would think twice about using it to defame me…The sites you are talking about are both idiotically uncredible and run by some real yahoos…The British have difficulty honestly dealing with Jimi’s murder in their country and both those sites were run by Brits who refused to allow me to post my evidence…You accuse me falsely there because the reason I was banned was exactly because I opposed the prevailing viewpoint that Jimi wasn’t murdered and the murder theories were BS…When I started refuting some of the regular members I was banned…So I hope you understand who is committing the “distasteful hypocrisy” here…I can reference some seriously credible Hendrix persons as well as professionals to back me up on that…It is ironic that you don’t realize you are only proving my point…Because the people I was banned for refuting their uncredible crude murder denial were persons exactly like Jason and Ivana…
Sensible people do not make an effort to give free speech space to obvious liars and trolls no website that attempts credibility fights for their protection while attacking the best and brightest…
If you prefer nuts like Jason and Ivana who are obviously trolling good luck to you…
You misunderstand me, Buster. I welcome postings of pornography or anything else interesting in the comments… What I do not welcome is an individual insulting the host of the party that is so kindly serving them drinks and hors d’oeuvres or demanding that that host eject other guests.
I publish the articles and take responsibility for the contents of the articles. That is all. The comments section is a town square that I have no intention or desire of policing (Even if I did have the desire to police the comments section, I do not know what happened to the great Jimi Hendrix and, as such, I am in no position to judge the validity of anyone’s comments). This is the generally understood policy for any online material permitting comments from the general public, whether we are referring to a video on YouTube or an article in the New York Times. If you are judging the New York Times or YouTube based on the comments beneath rather than the content of the articles or videos, I believe you will find yourself in the minority.
“Sensible people do not make an effort to give free speech space to obvious liars and trolls no website that attempts credibility fights for their protection…”
And who decides who is a liar or a troll, Buster? You? Scott? The government? Suppose that Jason or Ivana were to accuse you of being a liar or a troll? Should I listen to them and have you banned?
Your definition of free speech seems to be that you are in favor of it as long as you agree with what is being said. That is not my definition. I am in favor of someone’s freedom of speech even if I vehemently disagree with what is being said.
My permitting voices you don’t care for, Buster, is not “defending” them. It is allowing them to have a voice in the town square along with you and everyone else. You are presenting yourself and Scott as victims here, when you are anything but. You have had free rein here for literally years… Do you really think that no one contacted me and asked me to delete some of your comments or to even ban you from this site (on two occasions) during that time? And what do you think I did with those emails? I deleted them and thought nothing of them because the idea of muzzling you did not merit even a second of consideration from me. And yet now you and Scott attack me? Despite their demonstrably better manners toward their host thus far, I have treated you in exactly the same manner as Jason and Ivana. Even with your recent provocations, neither you, or even Scott, have been ejected from the party despite your efforts to drag me into something that I do not wish to be dragged into. I have not deleted or altered any of your numerous comments and I have no intention or desire to do so.
If you do not care for Scott or Ivana, stop engaging with them. If you do not care for me or the way that I allow individuals to post freely here, start your own website. With your own website, you and Scott could block every comment that you wish and you could speak negatively about me all day.
In defence of Justin he has been incredibly accomodating of everyone’ point of view. Buster I think you have misinterpreted the meaning and nature of this website. It is meant to be forum for peoples’ opinions and opposing points of view. The people on other Jimi Hendrix websites found your views distasteful quite frankly. Jason and I simply do not believe that Jimi was murdered and nothing you have posted here sounds credible enough for us to believe otherwise. You have placed your faith in debunked books, dishonest opinions, and downright lies. You are the one using derogatory language towards Jason and myself. It looks like this is a ploy in order to build yourself up and make yourself credible while trying to make others look silly. I have asked you many times to provide your sources and who exactly murdered Jimi Hendrix since it has been established that Michael Jeffrey was in Spain and Tappy Wright admitted he made the whole thing up. Now you have placed your trust in one of the Allen twins account; but doesn’t it seem strange to you that he spoke up about this decades later to coincide with the release of his book. Funny how he did not speak to the police about this and had Monika and Michael arrested. Are you really that desperate and gullible Buster? I dislike saying this but I think you should take Justin’s advice.
Jason and Ivana sit in their mommies basement picking fabrications out of their asses with their toothbrushes. And speaking of Jason and Ivana’s mommies, they are both so fat and ugly that they use a washing machine for a vibrator (same as Ivana).
Appreciate your reply Justin. Jason and myself comment of the contents of Buster’s arguments. I don’t think either of us have ever used derogatory personal insults towards anyone posting on this website. Buster needs to appreciate that there are diverse opinions out there in regards to this subject. I do not agree with Buster’s arguments and it is very obvious that he does not agree with mine. But this is the nature of this type of forum. So far, I think, Buster has not understood this basic premise by wanting Jason and myself to be silenced.
Justin: You haven’t answered the point and Ivana’s last answer is a good example of why that point needs to be answered…You can validate yourself by your making free space available but it still doesn’t change the fact Jason and Ivana are pretending to be sincere posters but their real intent here is to ignore the correct evidence and enter lies that we have failed our purpose…That’s otherwise known as “trolling” and if you give equal space to trolls and fight for their right while failing to screen content then you are still guilty of being the force that fails to stop them…The whole basis of civilized order from universities to court rooms is the vetting of information to determine merit and credibility…You yourself practice journalism…The definition of journalism is the reporting of facts in a critical way in order to achieve a better society…So one cannot use free speech as an excuse to ignore intelligent discrimination of input that leads to better understanding…In Justin’s world court rooms would be places where serious arguments of evidence would be made that serve as shocking revelations of gross injustice and crimes only in the end everyone would be given equal status (even though one side was obviously wickedly guilty) and no one would be made to account…It is no surprise that the obvious troll Ivana is happy with Justin’s judgment here and uses it to contemptuously patronize all involved…After all he’s helping her get away with unaccountable murder as far as her input…The free speech standard for any credible, honest journalist is the commonly understood shouting fire in a crowded theater norm…Your free speech rights do not, nor should not, extend to deliberate cause of public harm…Recently internet providers discriminate like they did in the case of Alex Jones where he said mass murder victims were frauds…So by the moral basis Justin turns a blind eye to, that is exactly what Jason and Ivana are doing…They are trying to turn depraved denial of real murder evidence in to a falsely suggested legitimate, sincere “opinion” and acceptable position when any normal scrutiny of their input would see they are making no honest attempt at evaluating the evidence and are only here to nay-say everything they are shown and reduce it to an idiotic trolling level…If Justin takes no responsibility for that doesn’t change anything…We have a private Facebook Hendrix murder page for which I am a moderator…Jason and Ivana would be allowed to make their case under the concept of free speech…Where they are right now is I would have gone to the moderator committee as well as some of the better members and told them I desire to make a motion towards banning for those two persons…I would state that the reason was those two were deliberately ignoring facts and evidence and entering disingenuous opinions and therefore forfeiting their posting rights due to dishonest input and therefore lack of respect for normal accountability…It would be done under the idea that there was no reasonable explanation for allowing people who were being deliberately dishonest for purposes of intentionally damaging the content of the site to continue to do so since doing so would work directly against the purpose of intelligent discussion…They would then be banned…I am also a free speech person…Even more so because I have been unfairly banned by the sites whose moderators didn’t want to allow the correct evidence…However I am not a fool and free speech is only meaningful if it is guided by wise evaluation of merit and intent…There’s no purpose in adversarial contest if the outcome is not judged and determined…In Justin’s court room the jury is given a final summation by both the prosecutor and defense but then everyone walks away and no verdict is decided…That doesn’t make sense no matter how it is validated…If the guilty are given as much right as the victims by means of avoidance of scrutiny of evidence then that defies the moral universe and leads to farce and injustice…It would lead to those who are wickedly in contempt of the truth and using its defiance for sick purposes to have an unfair advantage…If those who are allowed to avoid the truth by deliberately dishonest means are given equal right as those who suffered to produce the truth in a case of terrible injustice then a terrible advantage has been given to those who least deserve it…
I can’t see how Justin would look at the content of this comments section and respond “I do not know what happened to the great Jimi Hendrix and, as such, I am in no position to judge the validity of anyone’s comments”…Perhaps Justin is reacting as a person whose original article didn’t nearly cover the true facts of Jimi’s death as much our input does…In any case it must be asked how much proof does one need to produce before people admit there is a serious injustice being done here?…No objective person could look at what we’ve shown and not say the British authorities were seriously lacking in their investigation…At what point does non-response to serious evidence become seriously wrong?…I’m sorry but I think we’ve shown provable facts that deserve a better answer than that…
Because of this negligence of screening Ivana is being allowed to outright lie and say our sources were either dishonest or debunked…She’s not telling the truth there and in no way have any of our sources been discredited…A wiser evaluation of what is going on here is Ivana went right to the opening provided by Justin and took advantage of it…Which is proof in itself of what I am saying here…Justin asked who is to decide who is lying?…Well that’s quite a question from a person who describes themselves as a journalist…The obvious answer is the traceable facts and references we are making that prove what we are saying…Just the example of Sharon Lawrence alone serves as proof of what I am saying…Jason & Ivana said Sharon lied in order to sell a book…But anyone who knows the true history of this knows just the opposite is true and Sharon published only reluctantly and really avoids any kind of further pursuit of income from it…Jason got away with accusing Albert Allen – probably one of the most spiritually dedicated friends of Hendrix, who would be the last person on Earth to lie about such a thing, of lying in order to sell his book, even though there were other witnesses to Albert’s witnessing…Those are serious offenses that can’t just be blithely allowed under the guise of free speech and at some point those who make them have to be held accountable if the website is going to be taken seriously…
Buster, do not mistake a free-for-all food fight in the comments section of a blog for a court of law… I have no wish to be a judge or juror and I do not even read the majority of the comments that are left.
The comments section is intended for anyone that wishes to add something to a post, to offer feedback, to discuss the topic with others or to ask questions. That is it.
You have added plenty (and are free to add more) to the original informal post I made and the evidence you have presented is here for eternity for anyone else wishing to research the fate of Jimi Hendrix. Be content with that.
Buster continues to pathetically whine attacking Ivana’s and my character trying to have us censored only cuz we disagree with his bogus theory. For someone who claims to be the “foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix” and behaves in this manner is rather weak. Buster is angry that I showed him to contradict the entire premise of his “murder by wine” theory invented by Tappy Wright. Ivana has poked serious holes in the claims that he makes. And that truly angers him, which is why he is trying to have our voices censored. It’s obvious that Buster doesn’t like to be challenged with the flimsy materials he provides calling it “good evidence”. That’s why he is having this meltdown.
Buster was attacking other forums and sites for banning and censoring his voice. Now being a total huge hypocrite, he is desperately calling for the same thing to happen to Ivana and I. So, it’s clear that Buster is incapable of having a healthy debate with the material he provides.
Buster feels if a person disagrees with him or doesn’t believe what he says they are “trolling”. That is total nonsense. He uses that method as a character attack, as a cheap way to debate, trying to make the other person seem not credible to others.
Buster posts a bunch of crap and calls that his evidence. It’s hearsay, innuendos, made up fantasy scenarios, and quotes from his sources who have major credibility issues.
Then when i disagree with that so called evidence, he calls me a troll and claims I’m rejecting his “good evidence”. What he claims as “good evidence”, would never be admissible in a court of law, since it is only quotes and claims with no documented proof.
I’ve asked him to provide real evidence for his claims of wine with documented proof several times now. He refuses to post any and mostly ignores those comments.
He comes back with some quote or claim for his so called evidence, “Bannister told me this”, “Sharon could provide this”, “Aleem said he witnessed this”. This is not evidence. These are unconfirmed quotes and stories that no court would accept. And when I dismiss those claims and quotes as nonsense, which they are, Buster goes on the attack with his lengthy long winded rants.
All of these people that Buster quotes as sources have lied in the past. I’ve made that perfectly clear and those are the absolute facts. Anybody can do simple research and find that to be the case. So, as them being the liars that they are, I have a really hard time believing what they claim is true. Not only that, not one of these people have one ounce of evidence (physical or documented) to prove what they say is true. And after i point that out, Buster becomes angry saying I’m “trolling” “slandering” “rejecting the truth”. No, that’s just stating the truth.
Bannister is a convicted fraud who lost his medical license. Lawrence made up fake quotes in her book and perjured herself in court. Buster even gave her book a 1 star review on Amazon. Tappy Wright lied about his book claim. Aleem claimed Jimi said he could have his two prized guitars in 1969 and then sued Janie Hendrix trying to steal them from her.
These people all have major credibility issues. Then when i disagree with Buster, about their claims with no proof, he swears at me, and says “I’m a troll” rejecting “great evidence” and his “forensics”. His “evidence” and “forensics” is only either a quote, claim, or unverified fantasy scenario. There is no actual physical or documented proof (of anything he provides) for evidence that would be required in a court of law. It’s obvious Buster is ignorant about what evidence and forensics is cuz not one thing he claims is either.
For Buster to falsely claim I haven’t provided any evidence is a joke. I’ve posted an article from The Times from 9/18/70 that refutes anything Buster tries to claim. It clearly showed that Jimi arrived at the hospital dead on arrival and the doctors, police, and hospital all confirmed that it was a drug overdose. Not one word about wine mentioned by doctors. If there was all that wine that Buster claims, the doctors, would have stated that and the so called wine suctioning in that article. Bannister was the doctor. He said drugs in 1970 and then claimed wine in 1992 after he read Electric Gypsy to protect himself. I’ve also provided exact evidence coming directly from medical professionals reports including Doctor Teare and Dr Gavin Thurston. What does Buster do? He denies the evidence, adds his own conspiracy spin, and claims they forged the autopsy numbers at Jeffery’s demand with no proof except his own fantasy scenario. So, he is clearly guilty of suppressing the real evidence in order to promote his phony murder theory.
Another thing that Buster does, is he tries to argue events post 1992 and denies anything that happened on 9/18/70. Those post 1992 claims are all the conspiracies where there is no facts. So, Ivana and i provide real evidence that refutes his conspiracy claims, and he attacks us claiming we are trolling and not being serious. When it’s Buster who denies the real evidence in favor of made up quotes and claims that supports his theory.
Buster makes up scenarios with no proof and is unable to provide any real evidence for his claims. I will continue to do that in my future posts that will refute what he is claiming. Buster wants you to agree with whatever he claims, and if you don’t, you are the “bad guy” doing great harm. Buster has in his mind this grand conspiracy with no proof, which he makes up in his head on the fly. That is not serious or good evidence. He is content to only argue post 1992 claims and debate garbage quotes but rejects real solid evidence from 1970.
When any evidence is presented to him that refutes his conspiracy, he claims there “was a cover up”, “Jeffery got to him”, “intel buried it”. He also makes up events that never happened, changes testimony from people, exaggerates facts to fit his phony narrative, and then he changes his own theories and claims in each post he makes in order to prove himself right. That is the true definition of trolling and not being a serious poster.
His whole claim is that “Hendrix was forced drowned with wine” and then he changed the premise of his theory by now claiming “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”. So, he clearly contradicted himself and refuted his own theory and the entire Tappy Wright claim. That’s why Buster is angry and wants me censored.
So, it’s very clear that Buster is being a hypocrite while projecting on to me what he is actually doing . Anyway, I look forward to having a good discussion here and presenting my viewpoint. I also thank Justin for allowing everybody to post their viewpoints on Jimi Hendrix without being censored.
I say to Buster, get over your feigned outrage of demanding censorship and theatre drama. Start providing some real physical or documented evidence for your claims, otherwise you won’t be seen as credible. Posting flimsy quotes and stories that can’t be determined as fact, but only you believe to be true yourself is not “good intelligent evidence” or forensics”, it’s called a conspiracy theory, and a very bad one at that.
Buster’s rant is hypocritical and makes no sense. People are allowed to disagree. Buster only wants a one way dialogue where he can present his phony theory left unchallenged with his claims. And when an opposite viewpoint shows him to be not very credible, he demands censorship. In his mind, he is always correct and his phony quotes are absolute facts where nobody is able to refute them or otherwise they are dishonest and trolling. That’s ridiculous as it is insane. Buster himself was banned and censored from many forums as I have read, but it is hypocritical he would demand the same for others who disagree with him. I can see why he was banned and laughed off forums and not taken seriously from what I’ve read, the way he behaves and conducts himself with indignation, verbally abusive posts, making up his own facts, and presenting faulty information he believes to be such incredible evidence.
BUSTER says: Jason and Ivana are pretending to be sincere posters but their real intent here is to ignore the correct evidence and enter lies that we have failed our purpose…That’s otherwise known as “trolling” and if you give equal space to trolls and fight for their right while failing to screen content then you are still guilty of being the force that fails to stop them.
Basically your argument is whoever disagrees with whatever you claim is true, then in your eyes, they are trolling. That is insane. The problem for you is Buster, is that you haven’t posted “the correct evidence” which is why I ignore it. In fact, you haven’t posted any real evidence at all. Only quotes and claims from your usual 4 sources who are all confirmed liars. Then you get angry when that truth is exposed and call for censorship. In your eyes, only you are right and everybody else is wrong, even when you were proven to be.wrong. That is insane.
BUSTER says: Your free speech rights do not, nor should not, extend to deliberate cause of public harm.
Posting actual facts from doctors, newspapers, pathologists, coroners, ambulance men, police men from 1970 does not cause “public harm” since those are the facts. Isn’t that the purpose of any serious investigation? To get the facts? Buster isn’t interested in getting the actual facts, he just wants to argue conspiracy theories post 1992. When his theories are refuted, he gets angry claiming “public harm” cuz it shows his lack of credibility and his theory to be nothing but a phony sham. That’s why he is calling for complete censorship since his theory was proven to be false.
BUSTER says: So by the moral basis Justin turns a blind eye to, that is exactly what Jason and Ivana are doing…They are trying to turn depraved denial of real murder evidence in to a falsely suggested legitimate, sincere “opinion” and acceptable position when any normal scrutiny of their input would see they are making no honest attempt at evaluating the evidence and are only here to nay-say everything they are shown and reduce it to an idiotic trolling level…If Justin takes no responsibility for that doesn’t change anything.
Well, when you post a bunch of garbage as evidence, I am going to be a nay-sayer until you can actually provide some real evidence for your claims. A quote or unconfirmed story from Bannister, Lawrence, Aleem, or Wright is not solid evidence until they can provide specific proof for their claims. I’ve asked you several times to provide specific evidence for your claims and you refuse. All you can do is claim: “Bannister told me this and he is telling the truth”. He has no physical or documented evidence of any wine suctioned out recorded for Hendrix on 9/18/70 that would be legally required for Hendrix’s medical records. All we have is Bannister’s post 1992 claims that it happened. In 1970 when Hendrix died, Bannister said it was drugs. So that is a clear contradiction post 1992. And that’s why i do not believe his phony post 1992 claims. When Bannister was asked what happened to the wine, Bannister claimed ” he dumped it out”. And this is the “good evidence” Buster expects me to believe or else I’m trolling and causing “public harm”. It is an absolute joke and I will not believe in fairy tale conspiracies.
BUSTER says: We have a private Facebook Hendrix murder page for which I am a moderator…Jason and Ivana would be allowed to make their case under the concept of free speech…Where they are right now is I would have gone to the moderator committee as well as some of the better members and told them I desire to make a motion towards banning for those two persons…I would state that the reason was those two were deliberately ignoring facts and evidence and entering disingenuous opinions and therefore forfeiting their posting rights due to dishonest input and therefore lack of respect for normal accountability…It would be done under the idea that there was no reasonable explanation for allowing people who were being deliberately dishonest for purposes of intentionally damaging the content of the site to continue to do so since doing so would work directly against the purpose of intelligent discussion…They would then be banned.
Well, there you have it everybody, we all have to agree with Buster’s claims and point of view or otherwise we will be banished from his forum. He wants to run a dictatorship where only his viewpoint can be shared. Under no circumstances can a person disagree with his claims or present an opposite viewpoint with real facts. What a ridiculous forum to be in.
BUSTER says: Because of this negligence of screening Ivana is being allowed to outright lie and say our sources were either dishonest or debunked…She’s not telling the truth there and in no way have any of our sources been discredited…A wiser evaluation of what is going on here is Ivana went right to the opening provided by Justin and took advantage of it…Which is proof in itself of what I am saying here…Justin asked who is to decide who is lying?…Well that’s quite a question from a person who describes themselves as a journalist…The obvious answer is the traceable facts and references we are making that prove what we are saying…Just the example of Sharon Lawrence alone serves as proof of what I am saying…Jason & Ivana said Sharon lied in order to sell a book…But anyone who knows the true history of this knows just the opposite is true and Sharon published only reluctantly and really avoids any kind of further pursuit of income from it…Jason got away with accusing Albert Allen – probably one of the most spiritually dedicated friends of Hendrix, who would be the last person on Earth to lie about such a thing, of lying in order to sell his book, even though there were other witnesses to Albert’s witnessing…Those are serious offenses that can’t just be blithely allowed under the guise of free speech and at some point those who make them have to be held accountable if the website is going to be taken seriously.
Buster is clearly delusional trying to state that his sources have not been discredited. Tappy Wright admitted he lied about the phony Jeffery/Hendrix murder claim in order to sell his book. The late Bob Levine made that very clear. Buster even refuted Tappy Wright’s phony “forced wine drowning claim”. Buster now says that “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”. Buster is now saying this debunking Tappy Wright’s claim. So, Buster disproves Tappy Wright’s wine drowning claim proving that Tappy Wright was dishonest and Buster debunked the theory himself which even he originally believed. And here, Buster is claiming his sources haven’t been debunked or discredited. What a joke.
Sharon Lawrence made up lies in her book, that is a confirmed fact. Buster ignores this and continues to use her as as his source. Which is indeed baffling, since Buster gave her book a 1 star review on Amazon. So, it’s very dishonest and totally hypocrital of him to be using uncomfirmed quotes out of her book as his “facts of his murder evidence”, when he himself thought her book sucked and wasn’t very credible with his 1 star review. This is a good reason why Lawrence and Buster are not credible. You can’t give her book a 1 star review on Amazon (like Buster did) and then defend her on her on here, attacking me, for stating she is a liar trying to make money off Jimi Hendrix. This is the same woman who sold empty cigarette packs claiming they were Jimi’s from the 60’s in order to cash in on his name. So, It’s clear as day that she is willing to do anything to make money of Jimi. She has no evidence of her claim except for a date she used. And if her claim was actually true, she would have reported it in 1970 since she was an actual reporter. Buster only offered the usual lame excuse conspiracy theory of why she didn’t report it.
Albert Allen is not a dedicated friend of Jimi Hendrix. He made no mention of his “incredible story” in 1970 or thereafter. He waited decades later to print his claimed story in a book as a hook to make money. Any serious account like this would have been reported to the authorities or Hendrix associates in 1970, not decades later as he stayed silent. Real friends don’t do that. Remember, this is the same guy who made up the phony story that Jimi said he could have his two prized guitars. And then he sued Janie Hendrix trying to steal them from her so he could auction them off to the highest bidders for money. Another cash grabber looking to profit off Jimi. Disgusting.
Here’s the problem with Buster’s sources who he uses for his evidence of a “Hendrix murder”. They are not credible. Not one of these people who make these claims now told their stories when it was relevant in 1970 or thereafter. They all came out of the woodwork after Bannister made his 1992 wine claim. All of their fantastic claims came in the form of a book in order to make a profit. Their “increidible claim” was used a hook, it wasn’t even the main point of their book. If their stories were this serious, or real, it would have came out decades ago, not post 1992. And if Bannister didn’t make his wine claim in 1992 we would have never heard any of these stories. And then Buster claims we reject “good evidence”, when they are only made up quotes and stories like Tappy Wright’s, who Buster himself debunked a few days ago. Hilarious!
Hi Jason. I have a real problem with anything Dr. Bannister says. He states that Jimi was a very tall man with his feet hanging over the hospital trolley. He then states that he did not work on Jimi personally his medical team did. Another important fact is he changes the whereabouts of the wine gushing out of Jimi from the stomach to the lungs. Then he entirely contradicts what the ambulance officers and Dr. Seifert said. Dr Bannister claims that he saw Jimi before he died and after. This is a crazy statement to make as Jimi died five hours previously at the Samarkand Hotel. There was no suctioning done at the hospital as is well established as Jimi was wheeled into casualty his heart pounded as a mere formality in order to state time of death. Jimi was then transported to the morgue. Dr Bannister’s scenario implies Jimi came in an unconscious state and this warranted the half hour resuscitation attempt to save he life. The ambulance officers both stated that Jimi was dead as he had all the tell-tale signs of someone who had been dead for quite a while. They witnessed no red wine only black and brown vomit as the first ones on the scene that morning. As you said Jason the wine story was told only by Bannister in 1992. Can you image the physical toll on the body of someone who had died hours before in a resuscitation attempt. It would be impossible to bring someone back to life who had been dead as long as Jimi was. The doctors would not have even attempted such a futile thing as Jimi would have been brain damaged at very least and unable to function in any capacity. Can you image Jimi not being able to play his beloved guitar.
Hello Ivana, yes Bannister contradicts himself each time he speaks. He also claimed Jimi was “naked” when everybody else stated he was clothed. He said Jimi was dead on arrival cold, dead, and blue, dead for hours, and any attempt was a formality. Then he claims frantic half hour wine surging resuscitation attempts. Why would any doctor attempt a half hour resuscitation attempt with a full medical staff on a DOA? Also, a DOA is pronounced dead on the spot. Not “half hour treatments” like Buster claims.
“He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of someone who had been dead for some time.”- Doctor Bannister
This Bannister statement refutes his half hour wine surging resuscitation attempt claim.
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – Doctor Bannister
Bannister confirms Hendrix was dead on arrival. The phony half hour resuscitation attempt he claimed in 1992 is b.s since that would only be done on a person who’s still alive.
This Bannister statement makes clear there was never any half hour wine surging resuscitation attempt. He confirms what Dr. Siefert said. A formality is only a few minutes. Buster is making things up about “5 bottles of wine and half hour treatments”. Hendrix was dead for hours. Buster is suggesting that Jimi was still alive for a half resuscitation attempt. He also lied about the ambulance men rushing Jimi to the hospital to remove a “hardened cork of vomit” in his throat. He is again suggesting Jimi was still alive when the ambulance men and police man said he was dead. Nobody talked about hard vomit. Just more phony conspiracy stories since there is no evidence of wine.
I agree no dead person for hours would have these procedures done. Buster has a hard time with his claims since they all suggest Jimi was still alive to have these procedures done. Then Buster claims Jimi was “murdered at the flat” but then was rushed to the hospital for “half hour treatments” to revive him. So Buster has no idea what he wants to claim. It’s just one big fantasy story he spins with new twists and turns. I think his true objective is to claim he’s always right so he changes his story all the time. And there is no official hospital record showing these “half hour treatments”.
Dead people for hours can’t be brought back to life. That’s why Bannister’s phony post 1992 claims and Buster’s asinine theories are a phony sham.
It appears that Buster just debunked his own Hendrix “murder by wine” myth
BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
So, Buster clearly states that “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”. Buster also said that the .7mg barbiturate blood level would cause unconsciousness. Which is what exactly happened to Jimi when he took an overdose of pills. There was never any wine people. Buster just slipped up and told us that in his comment. Buster just debunked his own “Hendrix murder by wine myth”.
Tappy Wright made up the phony claim that Hendrix was forced drowned in wine by Michael Jeffery while conscious. Buster parroted that same claim. We all know that Jeffery was in Spain so that story was fake. The late Bob Levine said it was fake too. Now our friend Buster debunks Tappy Wright’s phony claim too. Buster says that Jimi was unconscious from the .7mg barbiturates and “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”. Since Buster now agrees with me, will he call Tappy Wright a liar?
Buster has officially debunked Tappy Wright and his own “murder by wine myth”.
Exactly Jason. Jimi had a lethal dose of barbiturate in his system enough to render him unconscious in a short amount of time. He them vomited and chocked to death. The autopsy performed by Dr. Teare revealed all of this. He never stated that there was any wine involved. As for one of the Aleem twins being in any way credible with his story decades later implicating Monika and Michael in Jimi’s death well how could that be since Michael Jeffrey was in Spain at the time. This is just another phoney story invented to sell books.
That Aleem story is a joke, Ivana. Aleem claimed he was sleeping on the couch and woke up at the same exact time Monika and Jeffery were plotting evil deeds and were looking at pictures with “incriminating evidence”. That story is more fake than Tappy Wright’s. And Buster said his voice sounded “truthful” over the radio. LOL
Aleem waits decades later to come out with his “story” for a book after both of them are long dead. Why didn’t he come forward then and tell the authorities, Hendrix management, or media so they both could be arrested? It’s all a phony money making scam. This is the same guy who made up a fake story claiming Jimi said he could have 2 guitars. Then he sued Janie Hendrix to steal the guitars from her so he could sell them for money. He’s no dedicated friend of Jimi’s. He’s an outright fraud.
These tin foil hatters except us to believe all these frauds kept these “incredible stories” private for decades and then finally spilled their guts to reveal the truth. And it just so happens, that all these “incredible stories” were used as a hook for their money making books. Sorry, I don’t believe in lies and conspiracy fairy tales.
Jason, I’ve just finished reading parts of Tony Brown’s book where Monika accuses the doctors of medical negligence in their care of Jimi at the hospital. The red wine story from Bannister may have originated from an attempt to retaliate against Monika’s accusations. She also accused the ambulance officers of placing Jimi upright in a chair with his head back as they transported him to the hospital. At any rate everything Monika said about that morning had been discredited from being at the hotel to travelling to the hospital in the ambulance with the biggest fallacy being that Jimi was still alive when the ambulance arrived at the Samarkand. Dr. Bannister then continues with this nonsense about the red wine causing Jimi’s death.
Ivana, you are absolutely correct. Bannister read Electric Gypsy himself and became afraid of a malpractice suit since he was already being investigated for fraud and malpractice. He saw that Monika mentioned wine in the book. So he used wine for his fake story since a wine drowning would do no good on a tracheotomy that Monika accused him of not doing. He invented the wine story right then. So, Bannister should now be known as “The Grandfather of Wine”. Don’t forget, that only 3 months after Bannister made his phony wine claim, he was convicted on 3 counts of fraud and medical malpractice and was struck off the medical register. And this is the guy Buster wants us to believe with all his contradicted wine stories that no other person ever witnessed.
Another thing that shows Bannister is a liar, is that he has a real hard time placing the actual events on 9/18/70. He thought Jimi was “unusually tall” and hanging off the trolley by 10 inches. He also thought Hendrix was “naked” when he wasn’t. He couldn’t remember any of his features. But all his new invented wine accounts are crystal clear to him. Clearly he is lying and he was refuted by both ambulance men and Siefert. That’s why Buster always attacks Siefert cuz he discredited his pal Bannister. Siefert said the attempt only lasted a few minutes and he detected no alcohol on Jimi. That refutes Bannister and angers Buster greatly.
Monika is not to be believed, but Buster uses her as his useful idiot when he needs her for his phony conspiracy. He claims she is a liar but believes her outrageous stories. He even said, where I read in the comments above, to buy her book and believe her phony story about Jimi firing Jeffery at 5 pm on the 17th, but that never happened.
Buster uses that phony claim as Jeffery’s motive for murder. But as we know, Jeffery was in Spain and couldn’t “arrange” one anyway. It’s a total joke. Buster also wants us to believe her “mafia” claim. So, Buster is clearly confused on which theory he wants to claim. He floats one crazy theory to the next. Buster also never did say who he thinks “murdered” Jimi since Jeffrey was in Spain. Do you think he really believes this stuff he claims?
Here’s an excellent example for everyone to read how Buster makes up fraudulent lies for his phony wine claims. So pathetic.
BUSTER says: September 6, 2019 at 2:48 pm
This wine that soaked Jimi and the murder scene was witnessed by Bob Brown and lied about by Dr Siefert (therefore more than confirming it).
Buster would have to ban himself from the forum he moderates for writing a fraudulent statement like this.
Bob Brown never witnessed any “murder scene”. Bob Brown was a doctor at St. Mary’s Abbots Hospital when Hendrix was brought in. Brown was never at Monika’s flat to witness the Hendrix death scene. You are posting a fraudulent lie. Only the ambulance men and the police were there to view it. Also, the coroner’s officer was there to take the left over pills that Hendrix took and some blankets for analysis. The blankets revealed only vomit. If there was wine, as you claim, the analysis would have discovered it. No doctors ever were at the flat to witness anything. You are a liar Buster, making up a fake story that never occurred.
So, Buster makes up this fraudulent lie saying that “the murder scene was witnessed by Bob Brown”. Buster is purposely changing events from 9/18/70 that never happened so he can promote his phony Hendrix “murder by wine” claim. That is pathetic and fraudulent. And here he was whining and crying to have Ivana and I censored while calling us “not serious posters” when we post facts. Look what he does. He makes up blatant lies. Buster is a liar, hypocrite, and projectionist.
Jason in regards to Dr. Brown he gave an interview to the press when questioned about the death of Jimi Hendrix. He said that he was the resident doctor when the body of Jimi Hendrix was brought in. Dr. Brown states that Jimi had been dead for some hours and Jimi was officially pronounced dead by another doctor at St. Mary’s that morning. So Jimi was not unconscious but dead when he was brought into casualty. Dr. Brown was definitely at the hospital and no where near the Samarkand Hotel that morning. Keep up the good work Jason.
Ivana, the phony claims of a half hour wine removal and resuscitation attempt implies that Hendrix was still alive. Bannister even said “Jimi was dead on arrival, cold and blue, dead for hours”. But then later claims “he worked hard on him for a half hour” to revive him. That implies he was still alive. So another contradiction. Same for the fake claim of a “hard cork of vomit” to be removed first before resuscitation. These crazy stories are ridiculous and make no sense. Then we get this:
BUSTER says: September 8, 2019
I asked you if there was no wine then what did they spend a half hour doing on Jimi if he was dead?
“If he was dead” he says. So again, Buster suggests Jimi isn’t dead when he claims Bannister was frantically removing wine. In other posts Buster said Jimi was already dead. So, he switches his theory depending on how he wants to argue with someone.
Hi Jason. I’d be interested to know who actually called the ambulance and what was said that morning. I read there were quite a few Hendrix personnel at the Samarkand that morning helping to clean out the room. It has been suggested by Kathy and Michael Fairchild that the delay in calling the ambulance by Monika contributed to Jimi’s death. The previous night/morning Jimi was at the Cameron party attended by a lot of his friends but Monika did not attend presumably because of the supposed row she and Jimi had at Harvey’s place. According to Monika Jimi only attended this party in order to tell Devon Wilson to leave Monika alone. But it is interesting that Jimi tried to get Devon to accompany him but she was would not budge. Monika then accuses Devon of drugging Jimi herself and further down the track Monika says the Mafia poisoned Jimi. Decades later one of the Aleem twins fabricates a conversation between Monika and Michael Jeffrey who just so happened to be in Spain and not in a Notting Hill hotel room at the time of Jimi’s death. Then we have one of the doctors trying to revive someone who had clearly been dead for hours contradicting what the ambulance officers saw and did and what was performed by the other doctors in casualty. Then the waterboarding by wine nonsense surfaces by an author whose story was revealed as one massive lie. The autopsy was performed by the renowned Dr. Teare who clearly states cause of death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication.
Hi Ivana.
There are conflicting reports on who did actually make the call. No doubt that her delay did contribute to Jimi’s death. She had no idea what to do and then she tried to cover it up with lies so she wouldn’t be accused. That’s why her story is so bad.
She was fighting with Jimi at Harvey’s and at the party when she tried to come in. Monika claims that, but Jimi wanted to hang out there. She made that Devon claim to get the suspicion off of her.
Yeah, Aleem, with his “incriminating story” who he never bothered to tell until he wrote a book.
Bannister looks like he fraud he is claiming he tried to revive a dead man with rigor mortis setting in.
Waterboarding claim is a joke. The autopsy destroys the myth and the ambulance men’s testimony.
Here’s an interesting old article that I’ve found. It details the demise of Monika Dannemann right after she dies and also has Kathy’s comments as well.
“She was with Jimi Hendrix when he died and built up a life based on their relationship. But in the end Monika Dannemann was the victim of her own self-delusion.”
“A Rock Legend Unto Herself”
The Independent
By Mary Braid
Wednesday 1 May 1996
When Monika Dannemann died of carbon monoxide poisoning two days after losing a court case, most press reports concluded that her death brought to an end a 26-year catfight over Jimmy Hendrix between two of his former girlfriends.
Dannemann, 50, was found dead in her fume-filled Mercedes after being found guilty of contempt of court for repeating a libel against a 49-year- old Surrey doctor’s wife, Kathy Etchingham. Both women were girlfriends of the late rock star Jimi Hendrix in the Swinging Sixties.
But the story of Dannemann and Etchingham is more than a lifetime of eye-scratching. It is the tale of the creation of a rock ‘n’ roll myth and of the woman who built her life upon it and felt compelled to bow out when the elaborate, artificial edifice began to crumble around her.
In the Inner World of Jimi Hendrix by his Fiancee, published in 1995, Dannemann writes that she met Hendrix in 1969 in a Dusseldorf bar. Hendrix was at the height of his fame. To Dannemann, he was not just the world’s most gifted guitarist. She considered him a prophet from the start. She claims she soon left Germany and her job as an ice-skating teacher to follow Jimi to London. She has always claimed – despite contrary evidence – that an 18-month relationship and engagement followed. What no one can deny is that she was with him the night he choked to death on his own vomit.
With some, that fact bestowed on Dannemann instant quasi-religious status. To others, she was for ever the focus for suspicions surrounding the circumstances of Hendrix’s death. Some said she delayed calling an ambulance; a few even claimed she poisoned him.
After Jimi died, Dannemann made a career of being Hendrix’s fiancee. Endless newspaper, documentary and book interviews followed with spreads in Hello! magazine at her home in Seaford, Sussex (a veritable shrine to Hendrix), and with Hendrix’s family in Seattle, as well as guest appearances at Hendrix conventions.
But in Dannemann’s lifelong homage to Hendrix, Etchingham was always the party-pooper. Hendrix had lived with Etchingham in the late Sixties. Their relationship lasted for almost three years. He was still involved with her when Dannemann claims their love affair began. Etchingham’s mere existence was annoyance enough. But her very different view of Hendrix – troubled booze and drug-abusing man rather than serene, spiritual, drug- free demi-God – no doubt irked Dannemann more.
In court, the contrast between the women was stark – Dannemann with her Marianne Faithful fringe, a grotesque superannuated hippy chick versus Etchingham with the sleek Nineties bob and the executive suit. While Dannemann’s life seemed to freeze on the day Hendrix died, Cathy, a mother of two, had had the sense to let the Sixties go.
Uli John Roth, who lived with Dannemann for17 years, seethes at how the newspapers depicted Dannemann as timewarp woman.
“I’m speaking up for Monika because she was never very good at speaking up for herself,” he says. Dannemann had moved on he insists. OK she still painted Hendrix but she painted other things, too.
Roth, a musician, says he only moved out of her Seaford home because he needed more room for his studio equipment. But in an interview last year Dannemann said their relationship had not worked and she knew “my heart would be for ever with Jimi”.
Roth insists he loved Dannemann for herself but he admits that he also valued her for her connection with Jimi. Roth was a Hendrix devotee from his teens.
To Roth, Jimi’s message flowed through Dannemann. “There was something of Jimi’s spirit in her. She was involved with him during the last 18 months when he went through a lot of emotional and spiritual changes. He told her about his music and its message. There was no one that he told as much to as he told Dannemann. And that made some people very, very jealous. He was not the psychedelic bubblehead guitar player as portrayed. He was the most important and revolutionary artist of the 20th century.”
At her luxury home in the Surrey countryside, Kathy Etchingham, answers her front door accompanied by a huge dog. She peeps out as if looking for trouble. Some one has phoned that morning accusing her of murdering Dannemann.
Her large homely kitchen seems a world away from Jimi Hendrix and the far-out, blow your mind, psychedelic Sixties. There are no portraits of Jimi. Today, she is trying to rescue her 18-year-old son from Japan where he has run out of money and she is waiting for her husband, Nick, to get home from work.
Etchingham has said little since the suicide out of respect for Dannemann’s family. But she says she does not blame herself. She could not allow Dannemann to go on repeating the libel that she was a liar and that she stole from Jimi. The Hendrix scene, she says, has its share of crazies. Dannemann’s accusations were putting her life at risk.
Etchingham is still remarkably girlish; with cheekbones to kill for. She was a 23-year-old hairdresser when she dated Jimi. She was another person in another time, and she seldom thinks of Jimi these days, she claims. But you wonder. Because even here the past still has its pull. She cared enough to spend three years in the early Nineties investigating the circumstances surrounding Jimi Hendrix’s death. She criticised Dannemann’s account of Jimi’s death for its “inconsistencies”. And her 34-page dossier resulted in Scotland Yard reopening the case, although it was subsequently dropped.
Etchingham also cared enough to lead a campaign last year to secure Jimi a historic blue plaque. And she has put considerable effort in helping to explode the “myths” created by the Dannemann camp.
She claims she only got involved in the whole Hendrix business in the early Nineties. “I don’t like history being altered,” she explains. “And it’s not right that anyone should change the character and essence of a person. Jimi was a really nice bloke but he was not a prophet. At the end he was a man who had lost his way. If you look at the footage of the final concerts you can see what LSD and cocaine do.”
Crucially, she believes Dannemann was never Jimi’s girlfriend and suspects their involvement lasted but a few days. “That’s why she could only ever speak about the night he died,” she says. She points to the absence of photographs of them together – Roth says Dannemann was camera-shy – and the denials of a relationship by other members of his band. Moreover, she believes that the image of Hendrix as a spiritual guru is sheer tosh – a reshaping of her former boyfriend in death in Dannemann’s own image. “A more likely message from Jimi was ‘Pass the bottle’,” she smiles.
She believes the court case was the final blow to Dannemann’s lifelong deception. “The court case established once and for all that she was not Jimi’s girlfriend,” she says. “Everything was beginning to catch up with her.”
In February, an American music magazine cast doubt on Dannemann’s version of events on the night Hendrix died and on her claims to a relationship with him. A recent hour-long documentary on Radio 4 was just as sceptical and a new film is expected to add to the doubt.
To Steve Rodham, editor of Jimpress, a Hendrix fanzine, Dannemann’s life was a life wasted.
“I think she really did believe she was Jimi’s girlfriend although there was no real evidence.” he says. “Jimi was just a guitar player. If he was alive, he would have laughed his socks off about all this. He liked women, but the music always came first.”
Seventy people attended Dannemann’s funeral. Many were Hendrix fans. In his candlelit studio in the Kent countryside, Roth calls some artwork up on his computer. It is for the cards he sent out after Dannemann’s death, illustrated with a few lines from the “Story of Life”, the song Hendrix composed on the night he died and a photograph of Dannemann floating above the planet.
Keep it coming Jason steering this website more towards facts rather than fiction. Another article that deals with this very subject is an interview between Kathy and Michael Fairchild where they discuss in detail Monika’s supposed involvement with Jimi. Apparently Monika met Jimi in Dusseldorf in 1969 after a concert. She spent a few days with him and shortly afterwards traveled to London where she claims they got engaged exchanging two snake rings. Jimi then went from table to table at the Speakeasy announcing this engagement to Monika but it’s funny how no-one can recall this happening. Kathy completely refutes this scenario as Jimi was living with her at the time. Monika then arrived in London in August 1970 renting out the basement flat at the Samarkand Hotel. The court case between Kathy and Monika came about because Monika called Kathy an inveterate liar in regards to her relationship with Jimi. Kathy sued and won with the judge establishing there was in fact no relationship between Jimi and Monika. Monika has been described as just another groupie seeking Jimi out wanting marriage. It has been suggested she killed herself because of the humiliation of the court ruling.
Everybody close to Jimi always said Monika had the whole thing in her mind. Monika was a groupie who was with some jazz musicians before Jimi. She became infatuated with him thereafter and felt “they would always be together”. She always looked weird in all her pictures. She killed herself since all her lies became exposed and she couldn’t take it anymore.
Monika was interviewed by British TV personality Selina Scott were she talks at length about Jimi’s spirituality and the re-opening of the investigation into Jimi’s death where she describes Kathy Etchingham and Dee Mitchell as two “Miss Marple” type figures. Despite the incredible research done by these two women in their 60 page dossier the Attorney General failed to find any new significant details to warrant a further investigation. At any rate because of these two women and Michael Fairchild we have a better understanding of what really occurred that morning.
Monika wanted to absolve herself of any blame in Jimi’s death. She changed her story different times claiming Jimi died from Drugs Devon gave him, the mafia killed him, Devon poisoned him, the ambulance attendants killed him by sitting him up in a chair, the doctors at the hospital were racist and neglectful. But we all know Jimi was dead at the flat. Eric Burdon said later the he finally realized Monika was a stalker. She looked like one too. She also said that Kathy was a middle aged party girl who met her husband who was a doctor at the hospital after overdosing on heroin. Kathy sued her after that and then Monika killed herself. Killing herself doesn’t end all her lies since they will always be there.
Here’s a short article that details Hendrix’s death which gets to the point.
Jimi Hendrix Rolling Stone
In the early hours of Friday, September 18th, 1970, while staying with a girlfriend in London, Jimi took some sleeping pills. Nobody knows for sure how many pills he swallowed, or whether he understood what he was taking. The drug was Vesparax, a strong barbiturate. Half a tablet was enough to put a man to sleep for eight hours – Jimi may have swallowed as many as nine. He had also been drinking. This was foolish and reckless but it was in character. During his years on the road Jimi had got into the habit of using drugs indiscriminately. “Jimi would take a handful of shit, not even knowing what it was,” his friend Deering Howe has said.
Jimi died on September 18th, 1970. The hours leading up to his untimely death are subject to numerous conspiracy theories due to the confused statements of his partner at the time, Monika Dannemann. A twenty-five-year-old German ice-skater whom he barely knew, the post-mortem revealed that he had vomited in his sleep and choked to death having overdosed on Monika’s sleeping tablets. In search of a full night’s sleep, Jimi asked Monika for some of her powerful German sedatives, Vesparax. Unaware of the half-tablet dosage, Jimi took at least nine. His reckless mixing of drugs and alcohol had become so commonplace the previous year that his girlfriends regularly woke up to hear him gasping and had to clear his windpipe. Sadly there was no angelic rescue and, aged twenty-seven, he died, six days short of the fourth anniversary of his arrival in London.
He called his music “electric church” because he believed music was his religion. His belief is put into practice at Seattle’s Experience Music Project, where one room is simply called the Sky Church, a great hall inspired by Jimi’s concept of a place where people of all ages, interests and backgrounds could come together to experience music.
Hi Jason. This terrific article puts everything in perspective and reinforces what both of us have been saying. I remember Noel Redding saying that Jimi was very trusting of people and all they brought were drugs so I think this implies that Jimi was in the habit of taking them without thinking. Jimi also believed that music has healing properties and is a positive force in bringing people together. Too bad he fell into the arms of Monika Dannemann and returned to the Samarkand instead of the Cumberland where he was registered. Like you said earlier Jason all of Monika’s subsequent statements were designed to distance herself from any blame for her actions that morning probably because of the increased scrutiny of her inconsistent statements.
Ivana, the trouble for Jimi began during the Electric Ladyland recording sessions. He was bringing in all these weird people in to sit in on the sessions to watch. Devon Wilson was there too. They were all bringing in drugs and Chas Chandler was disgusted by it all. He said Jimi was heavily on acid and it was changing him as a person. Noel felt isolated from the band and hardly make any contributions to the album since Jimi began playing his bass parts for him. That’s the reason Noel quit the band. Also, Chandler and Jeffery encouraged Noel to start a new band. Jimi took many takes for each track trying to make it perfect. Chandler got disgusted by it all and he only produced a few of the tracks. Chandler decided he finally wanted out and Jeffery bought him out of his contract for $300,000. Chandler was considered the 4th member of The Experience. When he left Jimi lost guidance since Jeffery wasn’t around that much tending to other business he had. That allowed Jimi to fall in with the wrong crowd and to be taken advantage of by these users. The Allen (Aleem Twins) were friends, but they encouraged him to use drugs and some suggested were using Jimi for their own careers.
It’s clear Monika was trying to find a cover story that she felt wouldn’t implicate her being at fault. Conspiracy theorists try to claim she was a “spy” working with Jeffery. That is absurd. She clearly changed her story several time to deflect blame from herself. If this was some sort of “plan” as they claim there wouldn’t have been all those inconsistencies and her behavior wouod have been totally different. She was afraid of what happened since those were her pills. She even said the pills were weak at first and then claimed they were too strong. She changed her story on that. So it could be she thought they were weak and had Jimi take more which is why he took so many. All I know is If Jimi wasn’t with Monika on the morning of the 18th he wouldn’t have taken 9 pills and wouldnt have died that day. That is a fact and is what makes it a tragedy.
Jason I think the whole Jimi Hendrix story does not need a conspiracy because the truth is tragic on its own like you said. I have been reading about the lives of some of the people associated with Jimi and the fate that befell them. For example Noel and Mitch fell into obscurity doing very little work as musicians after Jimi died. Michael Jeffrey died in a plane crash. Monika committed suicide by gassing herself in her car. Devon Wilson’s heroin addiction got worse and she died shortly after Jimi died. Another “girlfriend” Jeanette Jacobs suffered a nervous breakdown recovering a year later only to die in her early thirties. Despite Chas Chandler working with Slade as their manager he also died in his late fifties from heart complications and Gerry Stickells worked with Queen to die later on from a brain tumour. Kathy Etchingham had the good sense to move on, marry and have two sons by her doctor husband. She bravely conducted the investigation into Jimi’s death and lobbied English heritage for the blue plaque outside Jimi’s Mayfair flat with this apartment now refurbished and open to the general public for all to enjoy. However, her good friends Dee Mitchell and Angie Burdon did not fair as well.
(Hello friends, after reading several recent comments from tin foil hat conspiracy theorists, it is obvious that they themselves don’t even fully believe the phony quotes and claims their fraud sources make for their phony murder theory. So, as a result, they are forced to come up their own new made up theories to make thier claims sound more credible. They also fraudulently try to change the events to fit their phony narrative. Well, I am here to say that they are not allowed to do either. They need to be stuck with the original stories they claim for their fake myth and they need to be forced to defend it. They can’t be allowed to make changes to the already fake stories they claim since those are already set in stone. Tin foil hatters can’t come up with new theories for their already fraud sources. This is why they will always fail with a phony murder theory based on a lie right from the start.)
“The Hendrix ‘Wine Murder Myth’ is The Conspiracy Theorists Folly”
By
Jason
Conspiracy theorists desperately need to use the wine myth any chance they get to promote their phony Hendrix Murder Hoax. No matter the circumstances, wine is always somehow a factor with these kooks who try their hardest to fit wine into their theory.
When it is shown to them that there was only vomit on Hendrix, they look for other avenues to claim wine, such as the ridiculous “hard plug of vomit” theory that is totally absurd and completely made up. They put all their chips down on their fraud sources to make their claims and each time they come up empty since they have no evidence to prove. The only thing they use are the usual quotes and claims that are easily debunked. When those all fail, then they bring out the ridiculous conspiracy stories they make up on their own.
The number one problem for these tin foil hatters, is that the 2 main parts of their theory are based on lies right out of the gate. And with that, they are totally doomed right from the start, which is indeed their folly.
The Grandfather of Wine” ex Doctor Bannister stepped into the limelight in 1992 to claim Hendrix was covered in wine and was drowned in it. The problem with his claim, is that there was never any wine accounted for either on Hendrix’s official hospital medical file or in Thurston’s autopsy report. Tin foil hatters will try to argue with that, but what drives the nail in the phony “murder myth” coffin is that the ambulance and the police men who viewed the death scene saw no wine at all when they attended to Hendrix. So, this phony claim was DOA right from the start, which is why tin foil hatters have such a hard time trying to secure their phony claim. Even when Buster made up his fake “5 bottles of wine” claim that totally blew up in his face since 5 bottles of forced wine would show trauma, it still debunked his phony claim and he wasn’t able to change it.
Bannister made up this entire fake wine account in 1992 when he thought he was going to be sued for malpractice. So, he changed vomit to wine since a wine drowning would do no good for a tracheotomy that Monika accused him of not performing on Hendrix. So, Bannister used wine as a cover and tin foil hatters used it as their conspiracy. Bannister never gave a full throated endorsement to Tappy Wright’s phony murder claim. He only said it was ‘plausible’ since he knows the wine story is fake and could never fully say it was a murder since there never was one.
So, conspiracy theorists use Bannister as their main witness, and he fails on all accounts. He was already convicted for fraud and lost his medical license for fraud. He has no evidence or documentation for his claims of wine. No other doctor ever stated Hendrix has “lungs full of wine”. And he has contradicted himself and has given false accounts over the years. Conspiracy theorists use Bannister and he fails them completely which is their folly.
The next guy they use is a fraud named Tappy Wright who was a roadie for The Animals, but is now deceased. He made up the phony story accusing Michael Jeffery of killing Hendrix with wine and pills. Jeffery and Wright weren’t particularly that close, even when he was associated with The Animals, and even less so with Hendrix since Wright only briefly was a Hendrix roadie in the beginning.
So, being that they weren’t particularly that close, Wright made a fatal mistake and had no clue that Jeffery was in Spain when Hendrix died. Wright should have done some research before he made his fraudulent claim of Jeffery killing Hendrix. So, Wright’s fatal flaw in his phony quote kills the entire Jeffery murder claim since it is based on a lie. Tin foil hatters know this, so they try for other other ridiculous ways to still make their claim.
The problem for Conspiracy Theorists is they can’t change Tappy’s claim and try to add new ones. They are stuck with Tappy Wright’s phony claim that has been proven to be a lie. This is their folly and why they never can be correct with what they try to claim.
Tin foil hatters can’t try to claim now that “Jeffery had arranged the murder from Spain”. They can’t do that cuz that is not Tappy’s claim. This is their own new phony conspiracy claim that is false. Tappy claimed that Jeffery stuffed pills in Hendrix’s mouth and then poured wine down his throat. That is impossible since Jeffery was in Spain. That is Tappy’s story and they are stuck with it, and they don’t get to make new fake stories for their claims.
Also, this business Buster tries to claim about Hendrix being incapacitated with pills first is a total joke. Tappy Wright said that Jeffery “got a handful of pills, stuffed them into Hendrix’s mouth, and poured a few bottles of wine deep into his windpipe”. Nowhere does Tappy say Hendrix was incapacitated by pills before the wine. He said he stuffed pills in his mouth and forcibly washed them down with wine. So, Buster is not allowed to change Tappy’s story with a fake story of his own to make his phony “murder by wine myth” sound more credible.
So, tin foil hat conspiracy theorists are stuck with the inconsistencies and fake wine stories of Bannister. They can’t change them with new fake stories of their own. And they are stuck with the fraudulent lies of Tappy Wright who was an idiot and was proven to be a liar right from the start. And in no way, shape, or form are tin foil hatters allowed to come up with new stories since Tappy’s already failed. They are forever stuck with the lies and contradictions of Wright and Bannister for which they can’t change to sound more credible and this is indeed their “murder myth” folly.
I have just finished reading a 2018 study by Dr. Grant Brenner to assess who is more likely to be and believe a conspiracy theory. Schizotypal personalities are more susceptible to conspiracy theories seeing meaning in nonsense and mumbo-jumbo. They are convinced of knowing the real truth and see profundity in nonsense. Dr. Brenner also states that there is “strong connection between bull-shit receptivity and conspiracy theory”.
Very interesting Ivana. The main finding should also state that the conspiracy theorists who believe in the mumbo jumbo nonsense are truly gullible and easily swayed into falling for bullshit claims.
Here is another article with the late Bob Levine clearly stating that Jimi Hendrix wasn’t murdered debunking Tappy Wright’s lie and the phony murder myth that tin foil hat conspiracy theorists use.
Jimi Hendrix Wasn’t Murdered By His Manager, Says Former Business Partner
By Joe Bosso
May 26, 2011
Jimi Hendrix was not murdered,” says Bob Levine, who was the US manager of the late guitarist at the time of his death in 1970. “Despite the allegations that have recently been made, I need to set the record straight once and for all. Jimi died an accidental death, but he definitely wasn’t murdered – not by Michael Jeffrey, his UK manager, and certainly not by anybody connected to him. The whole thing is one giant lie.”
Levine’s statements counter a claim made by Hendrix’s former roadie, James ‘Tappy’ Wright’ in his 2009 book, Rock Roadie, that Jeffrey drunkenly confessed to him in 1971 that he murdered the guitar icon by stuffing his mouth full of pills and then washing them down with bottles of red wine.
“Tappy wrote that Jeffrey was afraid that Jimi was going to leave him for a new manager,” says Levine. “He also said that Jeffrey had taken out an insurance policy on Jimi that was worth a couple of million dollars and that he wanted to collect on it.” (Jeffrey would die himself in a place crash in 1973.)
“All of which is ridiculous,” says Levine. “I was Jimi’s US manager, and Michael Jeffrey was Jimi’s UK manager. Michael also oversaw a lot in the US, but he was involved in other business enterprises. Michael wasn’t always Jimi’s manager – Chas Chandler, who was in The Animals, was managing and producing Jimi at first. The three of us, in fact – myself, Chas and Michael Jeffrey — all saw Jimi together in 1966 at the Café Wha in New York City. You could tell he was going to be a huge star even then.
“After a few years, Chas and Michael had a split,” says Levine. “They broke up Chandler-Jeffrey, and it was decided that Mike was going to run the UK office and I’d look after things in the US. Tappy Wright worked in the office for Mike Jeffrey. He did a variety of things, among them acting as a roadie for Jimi. He did some roadie work for Ike & Tina Turner, too.”
Regarding Wright’s claim that Jeffrey murdered his star client, Levine says it was all cooked up to sell books. “I used to talk to Tappy every day,” says Levine. “I’ve known him since the early ’60s. He told me he was putting together a book about his years in the rock world. That’s fine – everybody has a right to do a book if they can. But he told me, ‘Bob, I need a hook for the book. I need a handle.’ He needed something that would be a grabber. Well, saying that Jimi was murdered is a grabber; saying that Jimi was murdered by his manager is an even bigger grabber. But it’s certainly not the truth.”
According to Levine, the night before he died, Hendrix was out on the town in London. “He did a bit of clubbing, and then he went back to his hotel to get a few hours of sleep because he had to catch a plane to Germany the next morning.
“He was with a girl who did give him some sleeping pills – Jimi always had a hard time sleeping, so he’d take pills to make him sleep. He had some wine, too, and went to sleep. But when it came time for the wine to come up – he had to vomit – he was literally knocked out by the pills, so he choked on his vomit.”
Hendrix’s body was found in a room at the Samarkand Hotel, west of London, on 18 September 1970. Although the room was listed to Monika Dannemann (who died in 1996), Hendrix was alone at the time. There is no record of who called the ambulance crew that discovered the body. “People weren’t very good at keeping such records at the time,” says Levine. “The actual death certificate from Scotland Yard read: ‘Accidental Suffocation.’ That was signed by the medical examiner.”
All of which makes Wright’s assertions, in Levine’s words, “pure baloney. He says that he called the retired medical examiner in Australia, who told him that Jimi didn’t die accidentally, that it was a result of ‘foul play.’ Now, come on, that’s right out of a Stephen King novel or something. An 80-year-old medical examiner suddenly changes his mind after 40 years and tells some guy who’s writing a rock star tell-all something like that? Totally ridiculous.”
“I told Tappy, ‘What are you doing making up this story? So you want to sell books – why do you have to print such lies?’ And he said to me, ‘Well, who’s going to challenge me? Everybody’s dead, everybody’s gone. Chas Chandler, Michael Jeffrey, Mitch Mitchell, Noel Redding…they’re all gone. Nobody can challenge what I write.'”
In Levine’s view, “Jimi Hendrix died by accident. He was a happy guy, looking forward to making music. And Michael Jeffrey didn’t have it out for Jimi in any way. I talked to him the day before Jimi died. He had major plans for Jimi. The future was very bright at the time. The whole thing about Michael taking out a life insurance policy and wanting to collect? That’s in Tappy’s imagination, too.
“Michael signed an insurance policy on Jimi that the record company took out, and Jimi was aware of this. But that’s standard. Frank Sinatra was insured by Reprise for millions of dollars. That’s how business is done. Record companies take out insurance policies on major artists all the time. But it was nothing ruthless or dastardly on Michael Jeffrey’s part. This is Tappy rewriting history.”
Now retired in living in Florida, Levine says that he’s saddened that Wright’s story might have found a way into Hendrix folklore. “It’s totally unfair to Jimi,” he says. “It’s unfair to everybody who was around at the time. I just think it’s really unfair to the fans, to anybody who ever loved Jimi Hendrix. Yes, he died a tragic death, and he died much too young. But spreading these lies that he was murdered? It’s utter crap, and I’ve been silent about this for much too long.”
Well researched Jason. I hope your article finally puts to rest all this utter nonsense about Jimi being murdered. I grew steadily tired of reading Buster’s long winded not based on fact rants about this. I always believe the truth triumphs in the end.
His long winded rants was made up nonsense concocted in order to spin his phony murder theory. He took one false claim from his fraud source and added his own b.s. trying to make it sound more credible. The problem with that is the whole fake story he made up is different from the original fake claim.
Hi Jason. I was wondering if you have any information on Terry Slater. He made some interesting observations about Jimi in an interview with a magazine in the early 70’s where he said he had been at the Samarkand and noticed that Jimi was not in a particularly happy mood. He also noted that there was no food whatsoever and no evidence that any had been cooked. Was Terry Slater at the hotel after Harvey’s party where Jimi and Monika had their row and/or before or after Cameron’s party? I know that Terry and Monika were both standing across the street when the ambulance as called.
Hello Ivana, Terry was quoted as saying Jimi wasn’t in a very good mood and that was earlier before Jimi met Harvey and accepted his invitation to go over to his flat. Jimi spent the evening at Harvey’s before going over to Kameron’s after. Jimi went to Harvey’s after 5:30 and stayed until after 10 when Monika became angry and caused the scene. According to reports, Jimi was annoyed when Monika came to get him at Kameron’s party. And if Jimi “fired Jeffery” as tin foil hatters lied about, Jimi would have told everybody at the party that he did, he never told anybody cuz he wasn’t able to fire him due to the contract that prohibited him from leaving until it expired. Terry also said there was no food there and I believe he also said there was nothing at the flat to cook with. Monika claimed in her first testimony that she cooked a spaghetti meal.
Well, today is September 17th. Sadly, this was Jimi Hendrix’s last full day of life on Earth in 1970. Below, we have a bunch of fiction coming from a tin foil hat conspiracy theorist, who made up a bunch of false claims that Jimi fired his manager Michael Jeffery on September 17.
This “firing” he claims would be the “motive” for Jeffery “murdering” Hendrix since he would no longer have money from Hendrix coming in. This claim is more phony than a 3 dollar bill and no research was even done to make the phony theory even appear to be legit. This whole thing is an absurd farce and you will see why it is as you continue to read below.
The main problem for this bogus claim is that Jeffery was in Spain, so he couldn’t have killed Hendrix. And below, we have the quotes of the fraudulent lies of Buster, in which you will easily see why this “Jimi firing Jeffery” story is all made up fiction.
BUSTER says: On September 17 Jimi decided all this stuff made Jeffery a bad deal. He called Jeffery’s lawyer Henry Steingarten and told him to sever his ties with Jeffery once and for all. 12 hours later Jimi was found dead under strange circumstances.
BUSTER says: Jimi fired Jeffery at around 5pm September 17. 11 hours later Jimi was dead. It doesn’t take a Sherlock Holmes to figure out why.
BUSTER says: Jimi fired Jeffery at 5pm on the 17th and was found dead 12 hours later under dubious circumstances with everyone lying.
BUSTER says: You seem naively unaware that there are persons who interviewed those closest to the evidence and that there is serious evidence of Michael Jeffery being fired by Jimi 12 hours before Jimi’s mysterious death with everyone involved lying…
BUSTER says: You are dishonestly ignoring that Michael had the motive because Jimi had fired him 12 hours earlier.
BUSTER says: Let’s not forget Michael was fired 12 hours before Jimi’s death and had much more motive than anybody.
BUSTER says: Try to get a copy of Monika Dannemann’s book ‘The Inner World Of Jimi Hendrix’. In it she describes how Jimi deliberately sat her down next to the phone at the Cumberland Hotel and had her listen to him calling his New York Lawyer Henry Steingarten instructing him to sever his ties with Michael Jeffery no matter the contractual consequences.
BUSTER says: No, if you bothered to study the real facts, Jimi finally made the move to fire Jeffery after realizing he was not working in his interests and was no good…You are just another idiot who seeks to blame the victim instead of honestly seeking the real cause that is quite easy to find with very little effort…Jimi fired Jeffery at 5pm on the 17th and 12 hours later he was dead…The two were not unrelated and anyone who doesn’t seek the facts in that direction is wildly derelict in their reasoning and obviously only seeking to prove their own denial.
So, after all this made up fiction from Buster who is clearly lying and fabricating for his phony murder theory, we get the truth that debunks this phony claim.
“While at the hotel, Hendrix made several telephone calls. Dannemann said he phoned his lawyer Henry Steingarten, asking him to find a way out of his contract with his manager Mike Jeffery, and producer Eddie Kramer, for whom Hendrix left a voice message.”
So, this information is easy to find that debunks Buster’s fiction. You can even find it in Wikipedia.
Here it clearly states that Hendrix called his lawyer leaving a voice message “asking him to find a way out of his contract with his manager Michael Jeffery”. Asking to find a way out of a contract is not “firing him” like Buster was clearly lying in his quotes. This debunks Buster’s phony claim that “Jimi fired Jeffery”. Jimi couldn’t fire Jeffery since he was still under contract and was legally bound to it. Jimi had no authority to fire Mike Jeffery and he knew it. Which is why he was only trying to find a way out.
So, this revelation debunks the phony Jeffery motive to murder Jimi since Jeffery wasn’t fired and was in Spain. Also, Hendrix didn’t even speak with his lawyer since he only left him a voice message. But Buster was clearly lying and fabricating fake stories to make his phony murder theory sound more credible. This is fraudulent what Buster has done. Recreating fake events that never happened in order to spin a fake theory designed to harm the reputation of a deceased manager. His pathetic attempt has been called out and debunked for good.
The tin foil hat conspiracy theorists lose their phony “Jeffery murder motive” since Hendrix never fired Jeffery. This clearly shows there was never any motive for Jeffery to kill Hendrix. Their whole phony “murder motive scenario” was that Jeffery was angry for being fired and had to kill Hendrix. Sorry tin foil hatters, your phony motive has been debunked and exposed as a fraud.
Also, the tin foil hatters already lost their “main suspect” since Jeffery was in Spain confirmed by 2 sources. Now we already told you that Jeffery was in Spain, but the tin foil hatters tried to claim Jeffery “arranged” the “murder”. Well, since Jeffery wasn’t fired like they falsely tried to claim, they lost their phony motive as well. Which now we all can see there was never any Jimi Hendrix murder perpetrated by Michael Jeffery.
So, we can say with complete certainty, that the entire phony Hendrix Murder claim has been debunked once and for all.
Tin foil hatters spread misinformation, fake news, hearsay, gossip and innuendo. They don’t rely on facts for their sources but make it up as they go along. They have a particular mindset that allows them to manufacture, fabricate and distort information to suit their purposes. It seems the more disturbing and salacious something is the more they seem to enjoy it and if you don’t agree with something they say you are either ignorant or stupid. This is the insidious nature of these tin foil hatters as they try to manipulate your thinking and seek out the gullible and easily swayed to further their nonsense claims. Don’t fall for it and be sure to think for yourself.
Jimi Hendrix Dies
September 18, 1970
LONDON (UPI) — Jimi Hendrix, whom many critics considered the world’s finest electric guitarist, was taken today to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival, due to an overdose of drugs a hospital spokesman said. He was 27.
Here is great piece from an article featuring Kathy Etchingham. Kathy gets right to the point here and sets the record straight debunking the phony murder claim invented by Tappy Wright and promoted by conspiracy theorists.
“Kathy Etchingham Dismisses Michael Jeffery Murdering Hendrix Claim By Tappy Wright”
Kathy Etchingham dismissed a recent claim made by Tappy Wright that Hendrix was murdered on the orders of Mike Jeffery to cash in on an insurance policy after Hendrix refused to renew his management contract. “I’ve seen the contract. It had two and a half more years to run,” said Kathy Etchingham.
A Monika Dannemann gave Hendrix some powerful sleeping pills, which Kathy says she claimed were “very, very weak”.
“So of course, Jimi thinks: ‘I’ll take nine of these ‘cos I’ve taken some uppers’,” said Kathy Etchingham.
Jimi fell into the hands of a crazy fan he met on the Tuesday. He was dead by Friday.” – Kathy Etchingham
Source: Sunday Express 9/8/13
Well, this is about the time of day on September 18, 1970 that tin foil hatters accuse Michael Jeffery of murdering Hendrix with pills and wine. Even they don’t fully believe in the ridiculous claim made by Tappy Wright, since Jeffery was confirmed to be in Spain, so they have to change the entire phony claim into another conspiracy to keep it going. We have a perfect example of this below. These conspiracy theorists should be ashamed of themselves peddling this garbage looking for an audience to fall for their crap.
BUSTER says: In the long-run whether Jeffery was actually at the Samarkand or not doesn’t matter. He arranged the whole thing and probably told Tappy Wright he was there in order to cover for accomplices involved in a much deeper intel plot.
The perfect example of a new phony made up conspiracy. Buster changes the original fake claim of Tappy Wright and fabricates his own fake story lying about events that never happened. Sadly, some people who haven’t looked into the death of Hendrix might believe a fraudulent lie like this. This is how myths and conspiracies start even though there is no truth to it.
Of course it matters whether Jeffery was at the Samarkand, since that was the story claimed by Tappy Wright. He specifically stated that Jeffery was there to murder Hendrix on 18 September 1970. Tin foil hatters can’t change Tappy’s claim no matter how ridiculous it is and even though it was proven false.
They can’t change the story like Buster did now trying to claim that Jeffery “arranged the murder” and his presence there doesn’t matter. That is fraudulently changing an original phony claim into his own new phony story. Buster goes on to say Jeffery “probably” lied to Wright in order to cover up for the people doing something more sinister in an “Intel plot”.
This is just a bunch of made up crap to spin a new phony claim. So, Buster is now claiming that Jeffery lied in the phony confession that was made up by Tappy Wright which makes no sense at all since the whole thing was a lie to begin with. These conspiracy theorists will continue to peddle their garbage no matter how ridiculous it sounds.
Here is another fake claim shown to be fraudulent on top of Tappy Wright’s own fraudulent claim. Always do some research first to see what people claim actually adds up. In this case, it is a total farce and a pathetic attempt at spinning an already bad conspiracy.
Hi Jason. Buster and Co are your typical tin foil hatters in that they are the only ones who seem to know the real truth that others are unaware of and see profundity in nonsense just like Dr. Brenner states.
Ivana, some of these conspiracy theorists know their claims are all b.s. They just continue to promote them so they can sell books or do radio shows trying to get an audience to buy into to what they claim for their own revenue. That is fraudulent and not fair to Jimi Hendrix and his fans just like Bob Levine said in his interview
No clear thinking person would ever believe anything conspiracy theorists put out there. Have you noticed that these false stories all have a common thread running through them. There is always some menacing force out there plotting evil schemes and manoeuvring and pulling strings behind the scenes. The Mafia, the CIA, the FBI or some foreign dictatorship all feature heavily in these plots. Even when initial stories have been proven to be false tin foil hatters need to invent new ones to keep the lie going in their shambolic claims. All of this is straight out of a James Bond movie and/or any episode of the XFiles. They prey and need gullible and like minded individuals to keep perpetuating these myths otherwise their “stories” cease to flourish and inevitably flounder.
Exactly Ivana.
It’s also an easy way for them to deny evidence that refutes their nonsense. When you present them with actual facts that the Meehan/Thurston interview never took place, they just claim that “Intel buried” as their phony claim. When you prove to them that Jeffery was in Spain on this day in 1970, and he couldn’t have murdered Hendrix, they claim “he arranged it with a CIA operation”. When you show them actual documented forensic evidence that refutes their phony claims they say “Jeffery was in MI-6 and his Intel operatives all got to the doctors forcing them to change autopsy numbers and testimony”. They even make the absurd even that Monika was a CIA operative but was clueless of the real plan lol. Just a bunch of garbage theories and total nonsense. But you are right, it’s always some sort of evil force and a plot trying to do harm behind their phony claims since they have no evidence.
(Well, hi again everybody. Here’s another amazing 3 Part Series for your reading pleasure. This is where conspiracy theorists lose their phony wine claim. Are you excited? I am. Expert testimony and evidence refutes any of the nonsense they try to use to advance their phony wine claims. We can all thank fraud Doctor Bannister who invented “the great wine hoax” in 1992. Bannister can be referred to as “The Grandfather of Wine” from now on. He was being investigated for fraudulent conduct in 1992 as a medical professional and was afraid of being sued after he read the book Electric Gypsy. So, the wine myth was born and conspiracy theorists used it for their own gain. But we have expert witness testimony and scientific evidence that refutes Bannister’s and the tin foil hatters claims of “wine by murder”. This will all be debunked in detail, so there won’t be any doubt left in anybody’s mind. But we can expect the tin foil hatters to promote brand new fake conspiracies since that is all they can do to keep their fake myth going. But after this series is complete, it will be very hard for them to do. Any reader will see their fraud claims for what it is, a total joke. In this new 3 Part Series, we will meet 2 ambulance men and a police man who first encountered the Hendrix death scene. Then we will preview some of the contradictions, lies, confusion, and the general incompetence of one Ex Doctor Bannister. And finally, the conspiracy theorists wine myths they parrot will totally be debunked for all to see. I’ve been really looking forward to that. Are you ready to get started? I am. And here we go with Part One that will defeat them on all counts.)
“Debunking Bannister’s and Conspiracy Theorists Phony Hendrix Wine Murder Myth : The Ambulance Men Edition”
Part One
By Jason
Tin foil hat conspiracy theorists only can use phony made up quotes and fake stories for their “Hendrix Murder conspiracy”. They have no real evidence to back their claims and that’s why they lash out in anger when their phony claims are exposed as fraudulent. That’s also why they choose to profusely defend frauds like Tappy Wright, Doctor Bannister, Sharon Lawrence, Aleem Twins, and anybody else that gives them the fake theories they need to keep promoting their fairy tale.
But since we have actual real evidence and true forensics on our side, it’s easy to refute their garbage. It’s also easy for the reader to see right through all their smoke and mirrors of a phony theory with incoherent ramblings.
In this new this series, we have the testimony of ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua who shed light on the death of Hendrix with what they witnessed. They were the first two men to see Hendrix dead and to view the death scene. It is their exact testimony that refutes the phony wine myth tin foil hatters and their fraud sources use to claim their fake “murder by wine theory”.
Out of all the testimony on record, the recorded eye witness accounts of what these two ambulance men stated is the most critical that totally refutes these phony wine claims coming from conspiracy theorists and fraudsters. Why is that you say? These two men actually witnessed the death scene unlike the phony “Grandfather of Wine” the phony ex Doctor Bannister, and others who made wine claims over the years. They were never there to witness the actual death scene and all their wine claims came from Bannister who invented the claim in 1992.
Bannister himself was never there, so any claim he tries to make is easily debunked by these two men. Which is why he has contradicted himself over the years with new stories each time he decides to come out from the shadows to talk wine.
Let’s take a long trip back to the morning of September 18, 1970, in London, at Monika Dannemann’s flat. Hendrix was already dead on the bed laying on his back when the ambulance men arrived at the flat. Reginal Jones and John Saua were the ambulance men who arrived first on the scene to witness a dead Jimi Hendrix.
“It was horrific, we arrived at the flat, the door was flung open, nobody about, just the body on the bed. We called out for someone, loads of times, so we walked in.” – Reginal Jones Ambulance Man
So, Reginal Jones the ambulance man, testified that nobody was there at the flat except for the body of Hendrix on the bed. That also means Jones himself had a very good look at the Hendrix death scene and carefully observed what he saw. He had an excellent view of Hendrix and everything around him before anybody else saw him. Jones was able to make very detailed observations with what he witnessed. What this man viewed that morning can’t be refuted by frauds and tin foil hat conspiracy theorists. This is extremely important since this is the actual death scene and what it looked like on September 18, 1970. Not phony made up claims post 1992 by these fraudsters.
“He was covered in vomit, there was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was.” – Reginal Jones
So, Jones testified to witnessing Hendrix being covered in vomit. But most importantly, Jones does not testify to witnessing any red wine on Hendrix. Tin foil hatters have already been refuted by Jones.
Doctor Bannister and his conspiracy theorist friends claim Hendrix was “drowned” and “covered” in red wine. Where is all this red wine they claim? Jones sure didn’t see it and he carefully observed the death scene up close unlike them.
Jones specifically stated Hendrix was “covered in vomit” and nothing about being “covered in red wine. In fact, he never said anything about red wine at all being at this death scene in Dannemann’s flat.
Red wine would be obvious if it was actually there. Wouldn’t you agree? This is the actual death scene where our conspiracy theorist friends claim that “gallons of wine” should be present. Reginal Jones saw no wine where tin foil hatters claim there should be wine. There was no red wine present which is why Jones never mentions it. Jones would have specifically stated there was red wine if there was any there. What did Jones see again? Vomit and no wine.
Jones also clearly states there was tons black and brown vomit all over the pillow. Notice he says nothing about any red wine covering the pillow. Wouldn’t you think the pillow would be soaked in red wine if Hendrix was “drowned and covered with wine”?
There can’t be a “Jimi Hendrix wine drowning” when our expert witness Reginal Jones never even saw wine anywhere inside that flat that morning. It certainly wasn’t on the pillow. Jones saw only black and brown vomit. It certainly wasn’t on Jimi Hendrix. Jones said he was covered in vomit. So, where did “The Grandfather of Wine” Ex Doctor Bannister get the idea that Jimi was soaked and full of wine? Jones saw Hendrix before Bannister, so Jones easily debunked Bannister’s claims of a wine soaked Hendrix.
Finally to add, we have no account of Hendrix being soaked in red wine with the testimony from Jones. Tin foil hat conspiracy theorists claim this is a gallons of wine “murder scene”. Gallons of wine should be present wouldn’t you think? Wine should be all over the place. But Jones only testifies to brown and black vomit on the pillow. Jones specifically states Hendrix being covered in vomit and not wine. Sorry tin foil hatters.
“We felt his pulse between his shoulders, pinched his ear lobe and nose, showed a light in his eyes, but there was no response at all. I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room, you get a feel for it, I can’t explain it, but you do and I knew he was dead.” – Reginal Jones Ambulance man
Jones now carefully observed and then examined a dead Jimi Hendrix up close to check for any vital signs of life. Jones saw no wine when he did his examinations on Hendrix. Hendrix was on his back so Jones had a perfect view of Hendrix’s mouth when he felt for a pulse between his shoulders. No red wine flowed from Hendrix as our conspiracy theorist friends try to tell us that Hendrix was “filled to the brim at full capacity”. If that was the case, wine would flow from his mouth as he was examined. No wine was around Hendrix or coming out of him as Jones examined him. No wine was flowing from Hendrix as he was moved out of the flat. Sorry tin foil hatters, there was no wine at all.
Fraud ex Doctor Bannister said Jimi was “drowned in red wine”. Why didn’t Jones see massive amounts of wine when he examined Hendrix first? Bannister also said Jimi had wine coming out of his mouth and nose. That is a fraudulent lie. That’s the first thing Jones would have seen when he shined a light in Hendrix’s eyes. Bannister has been caught in a terrible lie people.
Below, we have accounts of wine from a fraud doctor and by Buster that’s refuted by an expert witness who was actually at the death scene (unlike them) to confirm what took place and what was present instead of phony made up claims of wine. Let’s read on to see how that goes for them. Not too good I would imagine.
“He drowned, no question. His hair and his clothes were full of red wine, his lungs and his stomach were full of red wine. You couldn’t think about mouth-to-mouth because there was so much wine coming out of him.”- Ex Doctor Bannister
“There was so much wine was coming out of his mouth and nose.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
“The amount of wine that was over him was just extraordinary. Not only was it saturated right through his hair and shirt but his lungs and stomach were absolutely full of wine. I have never seen so much wine.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
“That wine that was soaking Jimi was wine spilled in the process of drowning him with it – the majority of which did make it in to Jimi and was witnessed by Dr Bannister.” – Buster
“This wine that soaked Jimi and the murder scene was witnessed by Bob Brown and lied about by Dr Siefert (therefore more than confirming it)” – Buster
“If there was no wine then why was Jimi covered in wine?” – Buster
“He was covered in vomit, there was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was.” – Reginal Jones
They claim “soaked and drowned in wine” but Reginal Jones refutes their phony claim by stating Hendrix was covered only in vomit. He was present at the actual death scene. They were not. “The Grandfather of Wine” ex Doctor Bannister invented the phony wine claim in 1992, decades later, and Buster just parrots his quotes for his phony evidence. There was no wine present in 1970 on the 18th of September.
Let me emphasize this once again. Reginal Jones was at the death scene to make a credible account of all the facts and the evidence. Buster and Bannister were not there. So, they are not able to refute what Reginal Jones testified to only witnessing vomit. Especially when Bannister triumphantly made his phony wine claim in 1992. Where was Bannister to claim all this wine on September 18, 1970? Oh yeah, that’s right he officially stated it was a drug overdose that killed Hendrix when he prepared the statement to the press for the hospital spokesman to read. Then mysteriously all this wine came about decades later after he read Electric Gypsy. Suspicious much?
Conspiracy theorists claim all this red wine. They claim Hendrix was “soaked”, “drowned”, “covered”, “wine coming out of his mouth and nose”.
But the first man who saw Hendrix dead (Reginal Jones) testified that Hendrix was only covered in vomit. Jones did not see Hendrix “covered in wine” as he examined him for signs of life. Jones saw no “wine coming out of Hendrix’s mouth and nose”. Jones saw no wine anywhere as these phonies are trying to claim. The death scene would show wine if there actually was. What did Jones see? Vomit and no wine.
“There was so much wine was coming out of his mouth and nose.” – The Grandfather of Wine Ex Doctor Bannister
Bannister claims Hendrix had wine coming out of his nose at the hospital. But when Jones pinched Jimi’s nose during his examination for signs of life, there was no wine coming out. When Jones pinched Jimi’s nose he would have felt wine on his own fingertips. When he put the light in Jimi’s eyes he would have seen wine coming out of his nose. He would have seen his hair soaked in wine and his clothes as well. All this wine would have been visible if there was a “wine drowning”. The fact that Jones never mentioned wine at all tells you there never was any wine in the first place. Nobody would even have to ask Jones about wine since he would have clearly stated it if there was any there. Since Jones mentioned no wine, this totally refutes the phony wine myth perpetrated by these fraudsters.
So, are we to believe that wine is going to instantly appear at the hospital in front of Bannister’s eyes when there was no wine at the death scene when another man examined Hendrix first? Only an idiot would believe that. It’s easy to see that Bannister made this whole thing up.
You can’t have no wine at the flat on, in, or around Hendrix and then have it appear like magic at the hospital for only Bannister to see himself. These phony stories don’t add up and are fraudulent.
Fraud Doctor Bannister claimed he has “never seen so much wine”. Jones sure didn’t see it and he was right there at the death scene to make a positive identification of vomit.
Bannister claimed his clothes and hair was covered in wine. Jones witnessed only Jimi being covered in vomit.
Then we have Buster, parroting claims of Bannister about Jimi being covered in wine. Buster asked me the question, “If there was no wine why was Jimi covered in wine”? Let me refer him to the testimony of Ambulance man Reginal Jones.
“He was covered in vomit, there was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was.” – Reginal Jones
Did you read this testimony from Reginal Jones, Buster? Jimi was covered in vomit and not wine like Fraud Bannister and you try to claim. Jimi can’t be covered in vomit at the flat in 1970 and then change to being “covered in wine” decades later in 1992. Sorry, that is not possible for no matter what you try to claim.
“This wine that soaked Jimi and the murder scene was witnessed by Bob Brown and lied about by Dr Siefert (therefore more than confirming it)” – Buster
Buster tries to claim that Hendrix was soaked in wine. Reginal Jones just refuted that claim when he testified to Hendrix only being covered in vomit. Buster then fraudulently tries to claim that Bob Brown was at the death scene himself. That is a blatant lie. Bob Brown was a doctor who was at the hospital. He was never present at the flat to view the death scene. Only Reginal Jones and his temporary partner John Saua along with the police viewed the death scene. And they all saw no wine. Otherwise, they would have made it a crime scene with a “wine drowning”. Since it was a drug overdose the police had Jones and Saua move Hendrix away. So, Buster blatantly lies trying to claim that hospital doctor Bob Brown witnessed the death scene. Buster is creating fake events from 9/18/70 that never happened.
So, Reginal Jones refutes any wine claims these phonies try to make past 1992 when nobody said a peep about wine before then.
This phony wine claim has been debunked already. But we will probably see our conspiracy theorist friends make excuses for why Jones saw no wine on or in Hendrix. They will also probably try to claim “a hardened cork of vomit” prevented the wine from being detected until it flowed like a river for Bannister at the hospital. Is anybody actually going to believe that crap?
That brings and end to Part One and what a start it was. Reginal Jones totally demolished claims of a “wine soaked and gushing” Hendrix when he witnessed only vomit covering Hendrix. He never said one word about wine.
When you have actual evidence, phony conspiracy claims are easily debunked as Reginal Jones testified to only witnessing vomit and no wine. Tin foil hatters still need their wine conspiracy but it has been debunked already. There is still more debunking to do and there will be more of it coming up in Part 2 when we meet Reginal Jones’ temporary ambulance partner, John Saua.
Jason I think that the mouth and throat would have shown signs of trauma during the autopsy if that amount of wine Bannister claims to have witnessed was poured into Jimi. But the autopsy revealed none of that only things consistent with inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. The vomit witnessed by the ambulance officers was dry and hard because Jimi had been dead for hours and it was merely procedure and protocol on the part of Mr. Saua and Mr. Jones to try and help Jimi. They saw no wine gushing out of Jimi only a fair amount of vomit covering Jimi. If Monika had been present as she claimed the police would not have needed to be called that morning to the Samarkand. The inquest held on 28th September, 1970 revealed the actual cause of death and it had nothing whatsoever to do with copious amounts of red wine. No other witnesses, apart from Monika and Gerry Stickells , needed to be called to give their version of events because the cause of death was obvious to the coroner. This was not a murder investigation.
Ivana, tin foil hatters will tell you that it was all a big “Intel British Government cover up” of the “murder” of Hendrix. Also, their phony claim of a “hard cork of vomit” with wine bubbling up from underneath that Jones and Saua couldn’t detect but only Bannister could. So, they needed to rush Hendrix to the hospital to access better equipment to dislodge the plug of vomit to then have Bannister take 20 minutes to remove the wine before a 10 minute resuscitation attempt. LOL
There definitely would be signs of trauma if all that wine was poured into Hendrix. Thurston and Teare saw nothing that would resemble a wine drowning in their examination. Which is why there was never anything stated on the autopsy or ever told to Jack Meehan about massive amounts of wine. I specifically stated that in my “Debunking of the imbibed wine myth” and then Buster went crazy trying to get me banned and censored cuz that exposed his fraudulent claims of “imbibed wine” from Thurston and a wine drowning. Then they want to claim that since there was no massive wine documented then they were “gotten to” by Jeffery and it is a British government “cover up”. Just more b.s. and nonsense.
Well written.
Jimi Hendrix
Jimi Hendrix AKA Johnny Allen Hendrix
Born: 27-Nov-1942
Birthplace: Seattle, WA
Died: 18-Sep-1970
Location of death: London, England
Cause of death: Accident – Overdose
Remains: Buried, Greenwood Memorial Park, Renton, WA
September 18, 1970 – Jimi Hendrix is found dead from barbiturate overdose.
September 18th, 1970 : Jimi Hendrix died in London of a drug overdose but the actual cause of death was he had asphyxiated in his own vomit..
R.I.P Jimi 1942-1970. Sadly missed.
I read on another website that Tappy Wright’s book was in the bargain bin where it belongs selling for as little as $2. I’m glad to know no-one bought this load of nonsense and I image the remaining copies were all destroyed. The same poster also revealed that Tappy Wright and Bob Levine were business partners so it’s no wonder that at first Levine supported Wright but then did a complete backflip and exposed Wright’s claims in his book as a complete set of fabricated evidence in regards to Jimi being murdered by Michael Jeffrey who just so happened to be in Spain at the time and no where near a Notting Hill hotel room.
This book was a complete joke, which is why Tappy needed to come up with his fraudulent Michael Jeffery lie in order to sell any copies. Conspiracy theorists main murder claim comes from a fake quote. Tappy died a few years after he wrote this disgraceful book, so lying in order to sell copies was just a waste of time.
London Times
September 19, 1970
Jimi Hendrix Dead From Drug Overdose
Jimi Hendrix, the American pop singer and guitarist, died in London yesterday. He had been taken by ambulance from a flat in a private hotel in Notting Hill but was dead on arrival at St Mary Abbot’s Hospital, Kensington.
The cause of death was an overdose of drugs, said a St. Mary Abbots Hospital spokesman, but a post mortem examination would be carried out today. The police said it it was in a flat where Mr Hendrix had died.
Mr Hendrix, who was 27 years old, stayed in Britain after the Isle of Wight music festival, where he shared the top of the bill. He recently returned from a European tour which was cut short because of the illness of another member of the group.
He had been staying at the Cumberland Hotel in the West End and on Thursday asked to extend his stay to include that night, but a spokesman for the hotel said he was last seen there on Wednesday night, when he ordered a meal to be sent to his £17-a-day suite.
The flat where he was found was at the Hotel Samarkand and was booked in the name of Miss Monika Dannemann, a West German girl who spent most of yesterday afternoon in hospital. Last night she was back at the flat, but under sedation. Mr Danny Hall, the manager of the hotel, said he did not know Mr Hendrix and the first he had known of his death was when police called and took a number of blankets which they had told him were for analysis. At the flat a coroner’s officer took possession of some sleeping tablets.
Miss Dannemann made her six-week booking through an agent in West Germany, he said, and she had arrived there some time in August.
Mr Hendrix first appeared on the British pop scene in 1967 with a record called “Hey Joe.” Mr Les Perrin, his agent, said: “On stage he was a very warm man with a great sense of humour. He was a world-class talent. It’s a great loss for the pop business.”
With his group “Experience,” Mr Hendrix had a new single scheduled for release in about three weeks. Mitch Mitchell, his drummer, said he had been talking to Hendrix about the release of a new album and about another European tour.
Mr Hendrix was the grandson of a Cherokee Indian but part Negro as well. Apart from his flamboyant clothes he was distinguished by his long frizzy hair. In December last year he was acquitted at a Toronto court of possessing heroin and cannabis at the airport.
Here is another article regarding the death of Hendrix. This was published the day after his death on September 19. And of course “wine” is not mentioned as the cause of death. Ironically, Janis Joplin was interviewed for this news article and she would die of a herion overdose just a couple of weeks later.
Drug Overdose Kills Rock Idol Hendrix
September 19, 1970
London (Reuters) – American rock star Jimi Hendrix died yesterday of an overdose of drugs, a spokesman for St. Mary’s Abbots Hospital announced.
Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.
“He was a good friend of mine and I will miss him,” singer Janis Joplin said when she told of guitarist Jimi Hendrix’s death in London Friday. And she cried.
Rock musicians across the country mourned the loss of a rare talent and brilliant guitarist.
“He was a innovator,” said Miss Joplin from a California recording studio. “He made everybody in the music business aware that the public was ready for and really wanted free musical expression. He showed that it really wasn’t delusion. It was reality.”
British musician John Mayall called Hendrix’ contribution “monumental”.
“The cat was definitely the main man,” said drummer Buddy Miles, formerly with Hendrix’ Band of Gypsies and now leader of The Buddy Miles Band.
Hendrix, 27, was found dead of an apparent drug overdose in a London apartment rented by 23-year-old Monika Dannemann, a beautiful German blonde.
Hendrix reportedly took several pills while suffocating on his own vomit according to hospital sources. A coroner’s officer took several blankets and some pills for analysis.
Police sources say the cause of death appears to be drug related. A post mortem examination was scheduled today, followed by a coroner’s inquest, probably Monday.
Eric Burdon, former lead singer with a group called The Animals and friend of Hendrix said: “All I know is that he had taken some sleeping pills.”
Burdon added that Miss Dannemann had found Hendrix in a coma and called an ambulance. She was taken to the hospital and put under sedation.
Hendrix made his last public appearance at a London jazz club Wednesday night. “We had been trying to contact him for three days but could not,” said one of the singer’s British agents. “It was very unlike him. He was usually very reliable.”
Hendrix, who featured wild music, swiveling hips and an unruly Afro hairstyle, once said he used drugs but outgrown them.
A year ago he told an interviewer, ” I tell you when I die I’m not going to have a funeral. I’m going to have a jam session. And, knowing me, I’ll probably get busted at my own funeral.”
When Monika arrived in London in August she apparently got into contact with Jimi again through Alvenia Bridges whom she met at a ski resort in Italy. In an earlier interview Monika claimed that Jimi asked her to return to London and get a flat ready upon his return from a European tour however Jimi was with Kirsten Nefer staying at the Cumberland Hotel with her. It is only after Kirsten left that Jimi starting seeing Monika again and staying with her at the Samarkand. The way Monika tells the story it’s as if she came to London as Jimi’s fiancé and Jimi was living with her at her hotel which is in itself unbelievable because Jimi had no clothes there at all and as Terry Slater explained there was no food whatsoever and no evidence that any had been cooked at the flat. Monika told Jeanette Jacobs that she had a ring and Jimi intended to marry her to which Jeanette replied “I fell for it unfortunately and left the country and having heard this from the girl right in front of me I didn’t have a leg to stand on.” She remembers Jimi saying please wait. Other friends of Jimi state that he would never consider marriage to Monika. She also conveniently omits from the story the row she and Jimi had at Harvey’s over his interest in another girl and the fact that she was not invited by Jimi to attend Kameron’s party afterwards and was insulted and told to go away. She then returns and continuously buzzes the intercom until Jimi relents and leaves with her. In his book Noel Redding writes that Monika’s casual attitude may have allowed Jimi to die as she failed to disclose just how potent those tablets actually were. She witnessed Jimi taking the pills but did not stop him from taking them knowing full well that the recommended dose is half a tablet. Subsequently Monika sued various authors who portrayed her in a negative light but evidently never managed to win a case. Tony Brown writes that it would have been wiser for her to just settle down with her memories but her run in with Kathy Etchingham and the court ruling sealed her fate committing suicide in 1996. Whether true or false Cream member Ginger Baker describes Monika in unflattering terms as someone unstable and Eric Burdon who was present at the Samarkand that morning says that at first he was a fan of Monika but later came to believe she was a stalker in today’s terms. In an interview Monika says that she was different but in what sense is not understood. Did she mean she was spiritual, creative, intelligent, wealthy, inexperienced?
Everybody that was close to Jimi all said that he would never marry Monika. He hardly even knew her and if he was going to get married, it certainly wouldn’t have been her. She talked about him like she knew him for years when it wasn’t even a week.
She claimed the pills were “weak” at first, which is why Jimi took so many and then came clean saying that they were strong.
Noel’s account sounds credible which is why she reacted the way she did.
Baker, Burdon, and Kathy didn’t feel she was mentally stable and Harvey said he had concerns about her behavior outside his flat believing she could have been violent towards Jimi.
Also, Jimi didn’t want her around at Kameron’s and if he was engaged to her he certainly wouldn’t have excluded her from the party.
When Monika visited the Hendrix Family in Seattle she had Al Hendrix sign a piece of paper stating that she was engaged to Jimi and they intended to marry all evident in Monika’s book. Apparently she made a few visits to Seattle visiting Jimi’s grave as the grieving widow as someone described her. However, on one visit she was made to leave suddenly as she apparently had a fall out with a family member. I would image this had something to do with Jimi’s death but what exactly I’m not sure of. Perhaps she revealed what really happened that night after Jimi took the Vesparax or maybe she told them the truth about the extent of her relationship with Jimi. Decades later Janie said she believed Jimi’s death was an accident with no-one at fault for what happened. She also reiterated that in no way does the Hendrix Family believe that Jimi was murdered or indeed in the nonsense conspiracy theories that emerged later on.
Jason and Ivana have contemptuously ignored proof and tried to get away with it…Albert Allen told his story to many people as far back as the 1970’s…The story was always the same and was based on seeing a full array of photos laid out on Jeffery’s desk of Jimi on that last day of his life…As I said before and the obvious denier trolls Jason and Ivana ignored, Monika did not release those photos until her book came out in 1995…I was actually one of the first people to see the full set when a famous collector friend of mine helped Monika with her book and showed them to me in 1989…So for Albert to be mentioning and detailing that full set of photos taken in the Samarkand garden in the 1970’s when they were not made public until 1995 could only happen if the actual event was real…Very simply, Albert’s witnessing is proven real by this one fact alone because there is just no way he could have known about pictures Monika did not release until 1995 in the 1970’s unless he witnessed them in person laid out on the table in front of him…Jason never answered this…And his blowhard nay-say trolling doesn’t compensate for that answer…There are also other corroborating events that also confirm it that I’m not mentioning…It’s real and it proves Monika was in cahoots with Jeffery while writing in her book that she feared him…
These two trolls never answered the timeline I have proven…Dr Crompton said in no uncertain terms that Jimi died no later than 5:30am due to the undigested rice found in his stomach at autopsy…That means Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 or 2 hours max…You cannot overdose or vomit profusely from 9 tablets in only 2 hours or less if you had Jimi’s famous tolerance…Proof that Jimi did not die from the barbiturate is seen in the extensive pools of vomit covering Jimi…If Jimi died from the barbiturate paralyzing his gag reflex then you would not see such intense vomiting because the barbiturate would have paralyzed his brain stem motor reflexes…That necessary paralysis is what causes real cases of choking on vomit…The intense vomit tells you Jimi did not die from the barbiturate because his brain was still capable of an intense vomiting reaction not normally seen in choking on vomit drug deaths…What you are seeing in that profuse vomiting is the action/reaction of a large amount of wine forced in to Jimi while he was unconscious and the body’s survival response in reaction…A strong force in equals a strong body survival reaction out…As the blood alcohol content that Jason conspicuously avoids tells us, this is proof Jimi died from drowning in wine and not the pills…As the timeline this pair of trolls refuses to commit to shows, Jimi could not have ended up that way from just 9 pills in 2 hours or less…
Jason never gave an answer to Flyswatter when he asked him to respond to Bob Brown saying “Jimi had obviously had a misadventure involving wine and was obviously beyond medical remedy”…
In 1975 on Caesar Glebbeek’s Amsterdam radio show Monika Dannemann said on the air: “There is evidence I can’t say in public…Jimi was murdered by the mafia for sure”…Proof Jimi was killed by an Intelligence operation is seen in the lack of any interest by any authorities to what should have been a very reaction-causing statement…
Buster’s posts are boring. Same old lame arguments and the same regurgitated phony claims that have been debunked. More of the same calling me a troll and claiming I’ve “never answered this” when I’ve debunked his whole bogus theory. Post something new.
We have more bogus stories coming from Buster the clown. Each one becomes more outrageous than the previous one. And of course, there’s no proof to support his claims.
Now Buster is trying to claim he was part of helping to assemble Monika’s book viewing the pictures in 1989. Can you believe this guy? More phony claims with no proof. Just like you claimed “Top World Pathologists” said you are an “expert at forensics”. And all these people you claimed you interviewed off the record told you “damaging information” against Jeffery but always said the complete opposite on the record in the media. Just more lies and nonsense coming from you that makes you a true clown.
Allen is a lying fraud and that’s already been shown to the reading public.
Now Buster believes Monika again after he says she is a liar. Buster uses Monika as his useful idiot when he needs her lying quotes for his phony theory.
Jeffery was never fired, so there was no need for them to be in cahoots and that proves your pal Allen to be a liar.
Your timeline is a joke and so is your wine theory. It has been thoroughly debunked. It’s already been proven through testimony from ambulance men and police men that there was no wine present at the flat. There was no wine recorded in the autopsy and no evidence of a wine drowning.
Buster only wants to argue quotes from people post 1992 to support his phony wine theory. On September 18, 1970, not one doctor said anything about wine being the cause of Hendrix’s death. They all officially said it was an overdose. If there was wine, they would have stated it. Every article printed in 1970 clearly shows it was a drug overdose confirmed by doctors at the hospital.
Buster also shows his profuse ignorance when he can’t understand that taking 9 powerful barbiturates plus a powerful amphetamine along with wine he drank at 2 parties would cause an increased amount of vomiting.
Donald Teare found no evidence of a “forced wine drowning” in his autopsy or any evidence of massive amounts of wine in Hendrix. He only found vomit due to the barbiturates Hendrix took. No wine was seen at the flat by the police or ambulance men.
Buster is still clueless about science and the human body. Pathetic how Buster still tries to weakly defend his failed phony wine claim. Your heart isn’t even in this feeble comment of yours, give it up, your theory already went up in flames. And Buster still hasn’t called himself or Tappy Wright a liar for peddling his fake quote now that Buster changed the entire account of his “phony murder theory” by debunking it himself.
Hi Jason. Buster reminds me of the wall flower who no-one will dance with and the school student who has no friends and sits alone at recess and at lunchtime. Imagine believing that Albert Allen saw these photos before Monika’s book came out in the 90’s. It’s funny how he supposedly overheard to murderers talking and failed to alert the authorities back then but waits decades later to release this damning information to coincide with the publishing of his book or is he just someone using his friendship with Jimi to make money. All people like this need is someone gullible and naive like Buster who believe their phony stories and who keep peddling conspiracy theories. People like Buster are just sitting ducks for the likes of Albert Allen, Tappy Wright and Dr. Bannister as they do the publicity work for them it would seem. Could it get any easier for these” biographers?”
Buster’s posts are becoming more and more ridiculous by the minute. He clearly lives in a world of make believe inhabited by witches, goblins and dragons. Can his stories get even more incredulous with claims like he was present when Monika assembled her book and being an expert on forensics. Who believes this garbage? Buster please don’t forget to take your medication and when you do just disappear along with your phony stories you have no place along Jason and myself as we will both win hands down with factual information alone. We do not need to draw attention to ourselves by making up false information disguised as fact as the truth in this story speaks for itself.
Jason is self-referencing above but is actually the one who is failing to come through in the evidence department…If you read this thread I have actually produced a valid forensic argument based on the direct evidence and it is actually Jason who is guilty of what he accuses me of…What is really happening is every time I make a direct forensic argument Jason answers it with his usual self-referencing name calling and accusations of my intolerable failings, but in between that bluster there is no substantive response to the evidence I am showing…Jason is obviously a dark web internet troll and is making up his replies as he goes along because he has no working knowledge of the subject…So the point stands that Jason has failed to give a credible response to my forensic argument that is valid, does prove murder, and has been intentionally avoided by means of trolling by Jason…
Ask Jason to please show us where I said I was part of helping Monika assemble her book?…I never said that…Jason is so fevered by his need to deny that he isn’t really paying attention to what is being said because his trolling responses don’t really need to accurately respond to what you wrote…I saw those photos in 1989 when a collector friend of mine was helping Monika put her book together…As far as I know they had not been seen by anyone before that…
Jason deals with my proof of Albert Allen being genuine with a one-liner response that calls Allen a fraud…But that doesn’t come close to answering what I actually wrote…I wrote that Albert told rock musician Buzzy Linhardt of his witnessing of Monika and Jeffery in the 1970’s and detailed the photos that were laid out on Jeffery’s desk of Jimi’s last afternoon in the Samarkand Gardens…My specific point was that Albert’s witnessing had to be real because Monika never publicly released those photos until her book came out in 1995…So for Albert to have spoken of a set of photos that were not made public for another 24 years means that he had to have witnessed them…Which in turn means his story is real…
Jason is a bombastic, pompous ass who lies and tells the public Albert Allen has been discredited but he does so clownishly in front of pure evidence he’s evading right in front of that same public he pretends to be addressing…In his phony summation Jason flagrantly avoids answering the fact that it is a matter of public record that Albert was telling of his witnessing to many persons over the years including Buzzy Linhardt way back in the 1970’s Greenwich Village days…In that account he told Buzzy of Monika laying out a set of photos of Jimi on that last day…The only set of photos of Jimi on his last day were Monika’s Samarkand Garden photos…Since Monika did not release those images publicly until her book came out in 1995 Albert, who was in New York, had no way of knowing about them unless he saw them in person…The horse’s ass Jason is hoping people are stupid enough to take his obnoxious name-calling and hand-waving seriously while missing the fact he gave no direct answer to this condemning evidence…
Jeffery was definitely fired because many witnesses told of Jimi making arrangements for new management in that last week…When someone went to Jimi’s lawyer Henry Steingarten and asked him about that phone call Steingarten replied “As a lawyer it is best that I do not talk about that subject”…By doing that he not only confirmed the call but also confirmed his knowledge of its implications…So the discredited liar here is Jason and the vindicated witness is Albert Allen…
Jason is an idiot, as is clear in his responses…My timeline is based on Dr Rufus Crompton’s statement to Kathy Etchingham that the undigested rice Dr Teare found in Jimi’s stomach “Precluded any time of death later than 5:30am”…Crompton was the top pathologist in England at the time…His correct determination showed that Jimi could not have had the pills in him for more than 2 hours and that wasn’t nearly enough time – nor were 9 tablets nearly enough barbiturate for a person with Jimi’s tolerance – to cause the profuse vomiting seen at the death scene that is not normal with choking on vomit deaths…Jason is moronically inarticulate to my argument that the profuse vomit is proof the wine killed Jimi because if Jimi had a barbiturate-paralyzed brain stem motor function loss he would not have been able to vomit so profusely…This is correct and shows that Jimi’s body was not paralyzed by the barbiturate to the point of not being able to have a very healthy vomit reaction…Such a reaction is commensurate with violent drowning and not the small trickle of vomit seen normally in drug/alcohol overdose choking on vomit cases…The official verdict is claiming Jimi died from the barbiturate paralyzing his gag reflex, however the amount of vomit is saying otherwise…They can’t have it both ways…Jason is obviously over his head and his answer is idiotic and shows he doesn’t even understand what is being said…He never gives a direct answer to the point and tries to get out of it with self-referencing name-calling…His input would make most people of average intelligence realize he’s a troll who is not worth taking seriously…
This debate is done as far as I’m concerned and any intelligent person could see Jason failed badly to answer my points…
You haven’t produced any forensic argument. All you’ve done is claim what Bannister said about wine and matched it up with the autopsy numbers. That is not forensics. you’re just repeating Bannister’s phony claim.
More stuff about Albert Allen where he told hundreds of people and not once did his story ever make it into a legitimate newspaper or magazine in he 70’s.
Buster talks about rice, but has no clue how the rice destroys his entire theory.
The rest is just more ranting and defensive nonsense.
In Buster’s world of make believe, gallons of wine that not one person has witnessed at the flat exists in his mind, and imaginary photos laid out on Jeffery’s desk from a claim by Allen decades later is the “smoking gun” incriminating evidence of proof for his phony murder claim. He should be embarrassed to even publically show how gullible he is.
Also, it appears that Buster has given up his claim of Jeffery being the wine killer since he is now quoting Monika stating “the mafia did it”. I guess Buster also believes that Monika was at the flat when the ambulance men arrived and took a ride in the ambulance with them.
Hi Jason. I came across an article on the net by Armond Blackwater as told by Ron Russell. If we both thought Tappy Wright’s book and Buster’s rants are ridiculous this article is even more ridiculous than both of those put together. Ron states that he was on the phone speaking with Jimi when he overheard Michael Jeffrey ordering Mitch Mitchell to pour wine down Jimi’s throat at the Samarkand. This story just keeps getting worse; the defaming of innocent people in these bogus accusations. As we both know Michael Jeffrey was in Spain and Mitch Mitchell was driving home to his new baby girl and wife.
So, now they add Mitch into their phony murder plot? And of course they need to use “wine” as their method.
I wonder how many tin foil hatters would believe this one? Sounds just like the phony story Allen aka Aleem made up about Monika and Jeffery with the phony photos. All these people are dead, and these fraudulent con artists can make up whatever fake story they want accusing people of murder. I think it’s disgraceful and it’s too bad a family member can’t sue them for defamation of character spreading outright lies.
All of these stories sound so ridiculous. “I was sleeping and woke up from a nap and saw this”. “I was on the phone and overheard this”. “In 1970 a fellow reporter just happened to tell me this”. Just a bunch of b.s. made up nonsense and all these stories are more phony than a 3 dollar bill.
Here’s another major contradiction coming from Buster.
On August 27, Buster clearly states that Dr. Crompton is not credible and then on September 21, Buster tries to use him as a source. So it’s clear that Buster has no idea what he wants to claim. He only uses people as a source who can benefit his phony claim, when needed, depending how he words his sentences. This is what you call a troll.
BUSTER says: August 27, 2019 at 4:05 pm
As I said before, Crompton showed evidence of changing his story under pressure…There is no out-dating of the forensic science in determining the digestive quality of a grain of rice and neither Crompton or Ivana answered that…Crompton was obviously under pressure to change his 5:30am time of death…He claimed that he used antiquated methods to determine the digestive state of the rice.
BUSTER says: September 21, 2019 at 10:15 am
These two trolls never answered the timeline I have proven…Dr Crompton said in no uncertain terms that Jimi died no later than 5:30am due to the undigested rice found in his stomach at autopsy…That means Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 or 2 hours max.
This is a clear contradiction and Buster the clown shows again how he is not credible. Buster continues to provide pure comedy for everyone reading.
None of these doctors had any reason to change their stories. How exactly does Buster know that they were put under pressure as he never verifies and/or substantiates his claims with any reliable source. I have continually asked him to supply the names of his sources but to no avail. I really doubt that Dr. Crompton said anything to the effect that he used antiquated methods; can you imagine if this were true the damage to his reputation;no-one in their right mind would risk this. It really does not matter how long Jimi had the pills in him since he swallowed a lethal amount. The fact that he was fully clothed lying on top of the bed covered in vomit substantiates this fact alone. Unfortunately Buster changes his story to suit his purposes, calling people names in order to make himself look credible and trustworthy. All this information is coming from Buster’s vivid imagination with no basis in fact needing to prove that Jimi was murdered despite evidence to the contrary from all the people who were involved that morning. No-one that morning mentioned that there was wine involved in Jimi’s death as the autopsy revealed inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. If wine was the cause of death this would have been evident in the autopsy. All these supposed sinister plots involving Jimi’s death are coming from Buster’s receptivity to nonsense and his tin foil hatter mentality.
Ivana says: How exactly does Buster know that they were put under pressure as he never verifies and/or substantiates his claims with any reliable source.
Buster uses two techniques when solid evidence refutes his phony theory.
1. Buster makes the claim the doctors were “gotten to” or put “under pressure” to change their results by “Intel”. He has no evidence of this only a bogus claim.
2. Buster claims he “interviewed” that person and they told him “privately” “damaging information” that confirms his theory. No proof or documentation of this exists.
So, Buster makes up phony claims for his theory to claim he is correct with no evidence or proof to back it up. It’s weak and pathetic.
Ivana says: I really doubt that Dr. Crompton said anything to the effect that he used antiquated methods; can you imagine if this were true the damage to his reputation;no-one in their right mind would risk this.
No highly respected doctor would even use a method of this nature or even state they did.
Ivana says: It really does not matter how long Jimi had the pills in him since he swallowed a lethal amount. The fact that he was fully clothed lying on top of the bed covered in vomit substantiates this fact alone. Unfortunately Buster changes his story to suit his purposes, calling people names in order to make himself look credible and trustworthy. All this information is coming from Buster’s vivid imagination with no basis in fact needing to prove that Jimi was murdered despite evidence to the contrary from all the people who were involved that morning. No-one that morning mentioned that there was wine involved in Jimi’s death as the autopsy revealed inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. If wine was the cause of death this would have been evident in the autopsy. All these supposed sinister plots involving Jimi’s death are coming from Buster’s receptivity to nonsense and his tin foil hatter mentality.
Correct, the lethal amount was fatal no matter the amount of time the pills were in his system. Buster makes the phony claim that “Hendrix couldn’t die from a lethal dose cuz he had an ‘infamous tolerance’ to pills. That is total b.s.
Buster refutes real evidence and uses his phony myths to make his failed claim. He has lied and contradicted his own theory many times now. Nobody witnessed any wine on 9-18-70. Buster’s phony sinister plots are used to make his theory sound credible but the crazy outrageous claims he makes show it to be nothing but a total sham.
I don’t believe Jimi Hendrix was murdered at all.
Hi Ivana,
It’s been documented that there was no wine witnessed at the flat either by the ambulance men, police men, or the coroner’s officer. So, how can the tin foil hatters claim a “Hendrix wine drowning” when their phony theory is dead right from the start?
That’s not true. Do some research. Plenty of documentation
I have done research. There is no documentation. Provide documentation of wine.
Jason hasn’t done any research…You can see the record of him learning it for the first time from me in this thread and Googling to read more about it…He’s making it up as he goes along and only seeking to deny…There’s a word that begins with “T” to describe him…
The hoaxer known as Buster makes up crap in his crazy head and calls that “research” and “evidence”.
Hi Jason. If anyone at the Samarkand that morning witnessed the amount of wine that Dr. Bannister claims was all over Jimi then this would have been treated as a murder investigation but Jimi had the tell-tail signs of an overdose and therefore it was treated as such. If anything Dr. Bannister claimed was true then this suspicion would have been conveyed to the police and raised then and there and not decades later in response to claims of negligence. At any rate I think everyone connected with that morning was questioned in 1970 and during Kathy’s investigation with no mention of wine whatsoever. Tappy Wright invented this bogus wine story and Dr. Bannister bought into it, I think, in order to cover his tracks against accusations made by Monika. Wright’s story is a complete sham but Buster still has a need to hold on to it. He has been banned from a number of sites because his accusations are so far fetched and not for any other reason he would have us believe. At least Jason and myself don’t hide behind various pseudonyms like Buster does.
Jason if you believe Anything Monika said you are clueless. You haven’t done your homework or won’t accept the truth h jimi was murdered
Of course there would have been a murder investigation with all that wine they claimed post 1992. There was no wine in 1970. Everyone said there was only vomit.
I saw his posts on the site you mentioned. Same garbage as he was posting here.
DAN says:
September 25, 2019 at 7:07 pm
Jason if you believe Anything Monika said you are clueless. You haven’t done your homework or won’t accept the truth h jimi was murdered.
Dan is clueless for making a ridiculous comment.
BUSTER says:
October 4, 2019 at 3:00 pm
Jason hasn’t done any research…You can see the record of him learning it for the first time from me in this thread and Googling to read more about it…He’s making it up as he goes along and only seeking to deny…There’s a word that begins with “T” to describe him.
Buster’s “research” consists of reading fraudulent books written by the likes of Tappy Wright and uses phony claims by Dr. Bannister as his failed evidence. Buster can provide no evidence for his phony claims of wine.
Buster likes to quote former Doctor Bob Brown, but as usual, he lies and adds his own words to what Mr. Brown actually said. So, that’s why I fact check Buster and show his quotes and claims to be false. We have Buster’s fake quote followed by an article that has the former Doctor Bob Brown speaking about his recollections of Jimi Hendrix at St. Mary Abbots Hospital. Bob Brown’s quote isn’t anywhere near what Buster tried to claim.
BUSTER says: Jason never gave an answer to Flyswatter when he asked him to respond to Bob Brown saying “Jimi had obviously had a misadventure involving wine and was obviously beyond medical remedy”.
The Courier Mail
June 6, 2012
FORMER Australian Greens leader Bob Brown has sought to clarify, once and for all, his role in the death of rock legend Jimi Hendrix in London in September 1970.
He was then a resident doctor at St Mary Abbot’s hospital when Hendrix’s body was brought in, he told the National Press Club in Canberra yesterday.
“He had been dead for some hours,” Senator Brown said.
“He’d had a bit too much to drink and whatever else and had inhaled vomitus.”
He said another Australian doctor signed the musician’s death certificate while he went off to look after a patient who had fallen under a train but was still alive.
So, former Doctor Bob Brown said Hendrix “had a ‘bit’ too much to drink.”
Brown never said Hendrix had a “misadventure involving wine”. In fact, Brown never even said the word “wine”. So, you can easily see how Buster lies and fabricates stories to fit his phony narrative.
Having a ‘bit’ too much to drink, is not having a “misadventure involving wine”.
Want to know what Bob Brown didn’t say? Brown never stated that Hendrix was covered, soaked, drowned, having lungs and stomach full of wine. Brown never said anything about a half hour resuscitation attempt or a “hard cork of vomit” needing to be removed. Buster clearly had lied about all of this.
This article clearly states that Hendrix’s body was brought in meaning that he was dead for hours. This also means there was no sucking out wine from his lungs or half hour wine surging resuscitation attempts. When you are a DOA, you are already dead, and they don’t do anything except sign the death certificate like Brown stated Bannister did. Brown just proved Bannister to be a liar. He also proved the tin foil hatters to be wrong and debunked their phony theory.
Want to know what Brown did say? Go back up and read his quote again. Brown said “whatever else he had inhaled vomitus”. So, Brown is clearly confirming that Hendrix died of inhalation of vomit like the autopsy record and news reports stated in 1970. This also again debunks the phony “imbibed wine” claim by Sharon Lawrence since Bob Brown never said there was lungs full of wine. So, coroner Gavin Thurston never told Jack Meehan that Hendrix was ‘imbibed with wine’ since it never happened.
So, Brown debunked Bannister’s phony claim since he never saw any wine on Hendrix. Brown was at the hospital and saw nothing tin foil hatters are claiming except they are taking his words and changing them.
Brown was a doctor and debunked the phony wine claim in this article. Tin foil hatters will need to come up with something new since another talking point of theirs just went up in flames.
Is this answer good enough for you Buster?
Hi Jason. Well said. I think Monika only went along with Sharon’s wine story to humour her and to show that she actually did something to help Jimi that morning by washing vomit from Jimi’s face and/ or to stop him from chocking. I don’t believe any of this really took place as none of this was brought up at the inquest or witnessed by the ambulance officers, the police or indeed the coroner like you said.
If there was any hard cork of vomit needing to removed in the first place and the supposed wine then came gushing out then it is very obvious that Jimi drank this wine before arriving at the Samarkand otherwise the wine would have been the first thing to gush out of Jimi and not vomit. The wine was supposedly all over Jimi and not ingested. So here we have contradictory views yet again. Was the wine ingested or was it poured all over him in the waterboarding scenario as suggested? Tin foil hatters do not make rational judgements but follow the more disturbing aspects that suit their suspicious natures. The ambulance officers witnessed only vomit which was brown and black if there was wine involved then this matter would have been red followed by brown and black in colour consistent with the meal Jimi ate earlier in the evening. It’s crazy to suggest that the doctors would have spent 30 minutes trying to resuscitate someone who had clearly been dead for hours as the ambulance officers noticed. Who exactly did the waterboarding since Michael Jeffrey was in Spain and Wright’s book was a lie and the autopsy revealed inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication? Or is it simply as Michael Fairchild put it that Jimi swallowed the pills with the wine and blacked out quickly from this lethal combination and Monika failing to disclose just how potent the Vesparax actually was? Like all stories that are based on assumptions they can be easily dismissed with facts.
(Moving right along with Part 2 as the phony wine Hendrix myth is easily debunked. Part One establishes that Hendrix was already dead when the ambulance men entered the flat. Reginal Jones the ambulance man, observed the death scene and saw no wine in the area of the bed where Hendrix layed dead. He also saw no wine on or coming out of Hendrix as he closely examined him for signs of life. We can officially say without a doubt that Reginal Jones debunked this phony wine conspiracy with his testimony. But wait, there’s more! Yes, there is more testimony from both ambulance men that refutes the tin foil hatters fake wine claim. Now we get to meet John Saua, the temporary partner of Reginal Jones who provides us with his expert eye witness tesrimony. So, let’s get going with Part 2.)
“Debunking Bannister’s and Conspiracy Theorists Phony Hendrix Wine Murder Myth : The Ambulance Men Edition”
Part 2
By Jason
Both ambulance men, Reginal Jones and John Saua, were not regular partners and never spoke with each other about this incident after it happened. Both men had no idea they were going to give testimony regarding what they witnessed. They both gave similar accounts of what happened that morning and most importantly, neither man mentions anything about wine around, on, or inside Hendrix at the death scene.
See, they both had an up close view of all the surroundings and could easily detect wine if it was actually flooded around Hendrix. Gallons of wine would have been soaked on Hendrix and his vicinity if there was a “wine drowning”. But to the sadness of our tin foil hat friends, there wasn’t any of the wine they claim exists. Do you know why? If there was tons, of wine like these gullible souls tell us, then wine would have been the first thing mentioned in graphic detail by these two men. Wine was never even suggested by them since there never was any. Both men clearly state the word “vomit” in their testimony. Where’s all the wine that “The Grandfather of Wine” so highly speaks of?
So, are we as intelligent people to believe there could be this “massive wine drowning” and have no evidence of wine left behind? Tin foil hatters expect us to believe just that. And when we smartly deny this outright garbage claim, we are accused of rejecting “great truth” and “great evidence” by these kooks which makes it even more absurd and hilarious.
In fact, our tin foil hat friends, expect us to believe everything they claim happens with no evidence. They can easily make up fantasy scenarios but they can never provide the proof intelligent people ask for. Tin foil hatters can look for a new phony theory to delude themselves with for their lack of wine, but deep down they know there isn’t wine any either. We can call it the “Red Wine Folly” for which they can play as one of their greatest hits. Time for the tin foil hatter to adjust their tin foil as we continue on with some more fantastic testimony.
“He was covered in vomit, there was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was” – Reginal Jones Ambulance Man
This testimony from Reginal Jones is extremely important. Jones states that Hendrix was covered in vomit. He also states that there was brown and black vomit on the pillow. Jones says nothing about Hendrix being “covered in red wine” or wine coming out of him. Jones said there was “brown and black vomit” on the pillow. Jones says nothing about red wine on the pillow.
If Hendrix was “covered in wine” like these frauds claim, wine would be on the pillow and Hendrix would be covered in wine at the death scene. Reginal Jones did not testify to witnessing any wine. Only that Hendrix was covered in vomit and there was vomit on the pillow. Yes, this phony wine claim has been debunked with expert witness testimony.
Both men moved Hendrix from the flat still covered in vomit until they reached the hospital in the same condition. Are we to believe that Hendrix became a “quick change artist” and changed from being covered in vomit to being “covered in wine” when Bannster made his phony claims in 1992? This is not possible and nobody should believe Bannister’s or conspiracy theorists fraudulent claims of wine when there was only vomit on Hendrix.
“We arrived at the flat, the door was flung open, nobody about, just the body on the bed.” – Reginal Jones
“We got down to the flat, and there was nobody but the body on the bed.” – John Saua Ambulance Man
So, both ambulance men in separate testimonies gave the same account of Hendrix already being dead on the bed with nobody else inside the flat. We can easily see these two men are credible witnesses.
“Well we had to get the police, we only had him and an empty flat, so John ran up and radioed, got the aspirator too.” – Reginal Jones
“So we had to radio for the police from the ambulance.” – John Saua
So, once again both men give the same exact account of what they did. Both men are credible witnesses.
“I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room, you get a feel for it, I can’t explain it but you do and I knew he was dead.” – Reginal Jones
“As I say, we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed, but I didn’t recognize him, don’t know anybody would have recognized him, his mother wouldn’t have recognized him.” – John Saua
Both men confirm that Hendrix was already dead on the bed with their credible testimony.
“He was flat on his back you see.” – Reginal Jones
“He was flat on his back.” – John Saua
Both men state that Hendrix was flat on his back when they found him dead.
“We felt his pulse between his shoulders, pinched his ear lobe and nose, showed a light in his eyes, but there was no response at all.” – Reginal Jones
“There was no pulse, no respiration” – John Saua
Both men give the same account of no pulse on Hendrix. Most importantly, both men examined Hendrix to check for life and saw no red wine coming out of him or on him when they performed their medical tests. Jones pinched Hendrix’s nose where there should have been wine coming out according to Bannister. Jones felt and saw no wine coming out of Hendrix’s nose. Buster the clown claims Hendrix was filled to the brim with wine. No wine came from Hendrix as he was moved off the bed. Wine would come out of his mouth and nose if he was filled with wine. Neither men testified to witnessing any wine on or coming out of Hendrix at the death scene at any time.
“He was covered in vomit, there was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was” – Reginal Jones
“He was in a pool of vomit, it was everywhere.” – John Saua
Both ambulance men testified to only witnessing vomit on and around Hendrix. They never testified to witnessing any wine that should be present when tin foil hatters claim Hendrix was “drowned in wine”. So, where is all this wine they claim? This is the death scene where wine should be easily visible to both Jones and Saua if there was wine. Wine would easily be detected by both Jones and Saua if it was present. There was no wine, which is why Jones and Saua never testified to viewing any wine. See, you can’t view something that isn’t there.
If there was massive amounts of wine Jones and Saua would have stated that. Gallons of wine would have shown foul play would be involved. The ambulance men and the police saw no wine at the death scene. Sorry tin foil hatters, your phony wine claim has been debunked.
“Well I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out with an aspirator. I mean the vomit was dry, and there was a hell of a lot of it. The aspirators in those days were all right but not like you have today, they couldn’t shift that lot. I mean we knew it was hopeless, nothing would have worked.” – John Saua
And here is where Bannister’s and the tin foil hatters phony wine claim is totally debunked.
John Saua opened Hendrix’s mouth to put the aspirator inside. At no time did he witness any wine coming out of Hendrix with the aspirator. Ex Doctor Bannister, Buster the clown, and Tappy Wright claimed that Hendrix was filled to the brim with bottles of wine. Bannister says 5 bottles worth. Where was this wine when Saua was sucking out Hendrix with an aspirator? If he was “filled to the brim” at full capacity with wine there would be wine being sucked out from inside Hendrix. John Saua never testified to any wine being sucked out from Hendrix. The wine claim is a hoax perpetrated by fraudulent con artists.
John Saua testified that dry vomit was inside Hendrix that was difficult to suck out with an aspirator. There can’t be any wine inside Hendrix since the vomit was dry. It is impossible to have 5 bottles of red wine coming out of Hendrix when Saua specifically stated that the vomit was dry. Bottles of red wine would make the vomit wet, it would not be dry. Bannister and Wright are stupid to even come up with a lie like that. And here Bannister used to be a doctor. It’s now easy to see how a moron like this was deregistered for fraud. Bannister is a fraudulent doctor making fraudulent claims of wine. John Saua with his expert testimony has debunked the phony wine claim.
At no time did John Saua say anything about a “hard plug of vomit” or a “hard cork of vomit” inside Hendrix that Buster the clown tried to claim for his phony wine myth. John Saua said “the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it.” Saua did not say anything about “a hard plug of vomit” when he was using the aspirator on Hendrix. So, another phony myth has been debunked.
Also, as Saua was working on Hendrix, he sucked up no wine with the aspirator. Saua did not see any wine at all. If Hendrix was “drowned in wine” there would have been a lot of wine. Saua would have seen a lot of wine working on Hendrix and he saw no wine at all. The phony wine myth has been debunked again.
“The vomit was dry all the way down.” – John Saua
See that? Vomit all the way down. John Saua testified that dry vomit was all the way down Hendrix. No way is it physically possible to have wet wine inside Hendrix, “filled to the brim” with wine, when dry vomit was all the way down inside Hendrix. Bannister’s and tin foil hatters phony wine claim has been debunked again with expert testimony.
“To tell the truth, I thought it was an overdose.” – John Saua
John Saua stated about it being an overdose which was common in London during in 1970. Nowhere does Saua state anything about alcohol being the cause of death. He specifically states an overdose. That was also confirmed by the police, the doctors, and the hospital spokesman on 9/18/70 when they all stated Hendrix died of an overdose. Nobody said anything about wine. The autopsy performed by Teare showed vomit and no wine. Thurston’s final autopsy confirms it to be an overdose as well. No wine tin foil hatters.
The black and brown vomit that Reginal Jones described coincides with what an overdose would look like. Vomiting up wine would be completely different. What Jones and Saua saw is from vomiting up a massive dose of barbiturates, not wine. The phony wine myth is debunked yet again.
“I vaugely remember taking a sample of the vomit in a container, because we didn’t know what he had taken.” – John Saua
We didn’t know what he had taken”. Saua is describing drugs here and not alcohol like the fraudsters who try to sell the wine myth are falsely trying to tell you. Saua knew it was a drug overdose, so he took a vomit sample to be tested at the hospital to determine what he took.
The sample showed it was high quantities of Vesparax plus an amphetamine that Hendrix took earlier that proved to be lethal to Hendrix. The exact reason for the profuse vomiting. The sample did not show any massive amounts of wine in the vomit. Otherwise it would have been documented.
So, we have forensic evidence of a vomit sample that refutes the phony wine claim. We also have the testimony of two medical men and the death scene forensics that refutes the phony wine claim.
But here is another important part of their testimony and what it means, it means that the phony “imbibed wine” quote that fraudster Sharon Lawrence made up has been debunked by these two men. I’ve already debunked her claim myself, but these two expert witnesses drive the nail in the imbibed wine coffin. So, with no wine detected (on or in Hendrix at the flat), we absolutely know for a fact that Thurston never had a chat with Meehan discussing imaginary “imbibed wine” since it never existed. The testimony from these men flows perfectly to debunk any and every phony wine claim since there was only vomit. And the vomit was due to a drug overdose like John Saua just stated above. The wine claim can be now buried in the conspiracy theorist boneyard of phony myths.
That was a lot of information to take in but it totally refutes this wine garbage. Do we even need a Part 3 since the phony wine claim has been totally demolished? Of course we do! Part 3 will introduce a police man as well as the lies and contradictions of Bannister and the conspiracy theorists who sell it. That will all be coming up very soon.
Hi Jason. You really outdid yourself this time. If there was red wine involved in Jimi’s death then this would have shown up on Jimi’s clothing and surroundings and there would have been no vomit witnessed. What tin foil hatters are suggesting is that Jimi was murdered swiftly by waterboarding but this in itself does not make sense because they keep changing the story from ingested to covered in wine. Jimi had a low blood alcohol level consistent with his intake that evening therefore the amount of wine that the tin foil hatters claimed was buried beneath hard corks of vomit could not have existed. Why didn’t Dr.Bannister raise the alarm when he was supposedly confronted with a man saturated with red wine in casualty alerting the authorities about this but decides to speak up about it years later? There is a very good and simple reason why the ambulance officers witnessed only vomit because there was no wine present at the scene that morning, and the autopsy report revealed what it did because Jimi died of an overdose of very powerful sleeping pills and not red wine. I am all for any more stories that shed light on what conspiracy theorists really are and what they stand for: a bunch of liars who willingly manipulate the facts and distort the truth so that eventually, in their make believe world, the truth becomes the lie and the lie becomes the truth. Stay well clear of these characters.
Hi Ivana,
Bannister claimed that the thought Jimi had a half a bottle of wine in his hair. So, how would a “Doctor” such as Bannister go about determining that a person has a half a bottle of wine in their hair?
Bannister made a lot of ridiculous claims about the morning Jimi was brought into casualty. Firstly Jimi was supposedly filled to the brim with wine flowing from every orifice. Secondly they tried to resuscitate Jimi for half an hour although he had been dead for hours contradicting the other doctors. Thirdly he states that Jimi was an unusually tall man with feet hanging off the trolley. Lastly he fails to mention the saturation of wine at the time, five bottles in total, to any other doctor present when it was the most relevant but speaks up decades later in response to a quote in a book. Bannister, not being the coroner and not present during the autopsy, then states in precise detail where the wine was coming from within Jimi’s body from the stomach to the lungs although it was made very clear by the coroner the exact cause of death which had nothing to do with wine but a lethal dose of barbiturates.
None of the earlier biographies written close to Jimi’s death mention anything about wine being the cause of death. Unfortunately the wine scenario makes an appearance decades later as is the myth that Jimi was murdered by his manager who just so happened to be in Spain at the time. This has now become imbedded in the imaginations of tin foil hatters and not helped by Dr.Bannister, Sharon Lawrence, Tappy Wright and Albert Allen. All of these people have gone against the established evidence that Jimi died of a lethal dose of barbiturates chocking on his own vomit. Kathy Etchingham’s investigation was very thorough and failed to reveal any further incriminating evidence except that it took five hours to call the ambulance and that Jimi was dead when the ambulance was called with Monika no where to be seen. Jimi was covered in vomit and not red wine at the scene. The experienced ambulance officers would not have mistaken vomit for wine just by the colour and consistency of the matter on and surrounding Jimi.
I visited one of my music forums that I haven’t been to in a while and one of the posters was repeating this tin foil hat nonsense in a thread. Same stuff that Buster posts with wine and conspiracies. So, the poster was talking about lungs of full of wine and that Jeffery did it. I pointed out to him Jeffery was in Spain and he didn’t know what to say. Then I told him to show some evidence of all this wine. He said there was wine on Hendrix. I told him there was no wine found at the flat. He made excuses for the wine and got angry. I told him to show evidence of all the wine. He couldn’t and claimed I am “stupid” and said Tappy’s quote is still right and refused to talk anymore LOL. Another tin foil hatter who can’t prove his phony claim except to repeat fake quotes and stories. Another tin foil hatter who can’t show evidence of wine.
Hi Jason. This is just how tin foil hatters operate by calling anyone who doesn’t agree with them as stupid. This is another ploy of theirs to bring credibility to what their suggesting and to make themselves look like the expects instead of the myth makers that they actually are. They don’t like to hear the truth because it doesn’t fit in with their suspicious natures. Imagine believing Michael Jeffrey murdered Jimi as he was in Spain at the time actually waiting for Jimi to fly over there to meet up at the Sgt. Pepper club. They never seem to be able to supply the names of their sources and when the truth is revealed to them of what occurred at the Samarkand that morning they get angry and defensive and won’t accept the reality of the situation because their mindset won’t allow it. It seems they prefer to hear that Jimi was waterboarded to death rather than passing away in his sleep from the Vesparax.
Hey Ivana……So, the poster came back and started in with MI-6 and CIA nonsense claiming Jeffery was in charge of the whole operation. Sound familiar? Posted stuff about black panthers and mobsters shaking down Hendrix in London before they drowned him in wine. So, I asked him to show evidence for all these bogus claims and he replied “I don’t have to prove anything to you.”
Then he talked about Bannister and the wine as well as Tappy Wright’s b.s. quote. After I showed him there was no wine found in the autopsy results and testimony from the ambulance men that proved no wine at the flat, he called me “an evil liar and twister of the truth” then unleashing an obscenity filled tirade that made me laugh so hard my stomach hurt. I’m sure he will soon be banned for that.
These tin foil hatters all read and repeat the same garbage using the same phony claims. After you call them out, asking for real evidence, they lose it and go berserk. You see it all the time with these kooks. Not sure why they want to claim Jimi died a horrible drowning when it never even happened.
Another thing I’ve noticed about these conspirators is they infiltrate any website in order to spread their beliefs. They also never reveal who they really are preferring to use pseudonyms instead of their real names. By doing this they can get away with saying just about anything and using derogatory terms with their opponents without being caught. Some of the better known tin foil hatters have been banned from numerous music forums because their suspicious reasoning doesn’t fit in with the more serious sites. But this does not put a stop to or deter them instead they seek out other venues to vent their nonsense and to build support. Judging from the number of people who buy into Jimi being murdered by his manager on this site the truth of what really happened to Jimi that morning , there seems to be a real reluctance to let go of the lies and accept the truth. Tappy Wright’s book to my knowledge is the only source which claims that Jimi was murdered by his manager with a handful of pills and wine. This book has been revealed to be a lie but some are still clinging onto it and using it as their base for the truth. As I said in another post no biography written close to Jimi’s death ever mentions wine as the cause of death. It’s pretty obvious that this murder scenario was added years later in order to sell books.
I’ve noticed that too. I was viewing a couple of sites and one looked exactly like someone “very familiar” posting under a different alias. Same long winded posts with the exact same bogus claims like he does here. He posted on that one “Jimi Hendrix Murder” thread for a couple of months until the moderator locked it down. The posters were all laughing at him and not one person agreed with him. He used scrum drum on other sites. Didn’t you say he was banned on several forums?
Tappy’s fraud book was the first to say Jeffery killed Jimi with wine and pills but other sites and radio shows have peddled this phony claim just to get gullible people to listen or read their site.
These people have no facts only the phony claims they read.
Jason keep holding on to that sense of humour of yours and keep posting your articles; this is the best way to get back at their phony claims and these tin foil hatter kooks. It seems as though the truth in itself isn’t interesting enough for them so they have a need to invent their own story. It’s best to just ignore them and what they say as none of it is true; that’s why they have been blocked from posting any further on some sites.
Jason, it must have been very crowded in London with all the people who were out to kill Jimi at the Samarkand that morning; Michael Jeffrey,Monika, The black panthers, MI-6, CIA, and the more recent addition Mitch Mitchell. The stories are getting more and more unbelievable and grandiose by the minute and proves that they are being made up as we go along just as we have been suggesting and suspecting. LOL.
I definitely will do that and I still have Part 3 coming up. Also, Bannister will be next and Jeffery after that. Yeah, it is best to ignore them since they just repeat the same b.s. anyway.
Had to have been a huge crowded scene with all the mobsters, agents, and panthers outside with Jeffery on the phone from Spain talking to the head agent at the phone booth giving them the orders of their exact placements. I wonder if they were fighting over who got to hold the bottles of wine and why Jeffery decided on just 5 bottles. Do you think Monika gave the signal and Mitch did a drum roll before they all rushed inside? I have an image of The Three Stooges crashing through the door. LOL. The black panthers were probably outside keeping watch over the whole operation while tin foil hatters would tell us that Jeffery was in the bushes with binoculars before he took over administering the wine. Lol.
Their stories are ridiculous and get worse each time they tell them. I bet you if you told them this story they would believe it haha
Really enjoyed your last comment Jason and I’m sure the people over at Crosstown Torrents would appreciate it as well. I can imagine the tin foil hatters have steam coming out of their ears. I have been reading parts of Electric Gypsy 1990 version where Monika mentions that Jimi drank some wine while eating tuna fish sandwiches. This is something Kathy disputed as Jimi apparently detested Tuna and also contradicts what Terry Slater observed as there being no food at the flat. Monika was the first to mention wine in this edition of the book and then Dr. Bannister came out with his story in 1992 about Jimi having asphyxiated on red wine which filled his airways in response to what he read in Electric Gypsy. Our dear doctor made a lot contradictory statements about that morning unfortunately and none of it rings true. I doubt whether the patient he’s referring to was actually Jimi or someone else entirely or if indeed this patient existed at all. No one else mentioned the red wine as the cause of death so it obvious that this scenario has been made up. Jason, I’m looking forward to your piece on Dr. Bannister to further shed light on what went down that morning.
Anybody that isn’t a tin foil hatter would have a laugh just thinking about how ridiculous the whole things is. All these organizations and groups working together, waiting outside with wine and pills to do in Hendrix. And Jeffery running around to a coroner and a pathologist “putting pressure” on them to forge the results. The worst one yet is that joker Allen aka Aleem waking up from a nap to see photos watching Monika and Jeffery plotting evil deeds. For such a big MI-6 super agent, Jeffery sure was terrible at his job with witnesses watching him in action and bumbling his way through a “Hendrix murder” and the whole aftermath as tin foil hatters claim. Monika was supposed to be a special agent to according to Buster the clown, and we all know what a terrible liar she was. How did Jeffery and Monika ever pass their training to become master agents? Lol.
The “Godfather of Wine” ex Doctor Bannister read the first version of Electric Gypsy and got the wine idea from that book. I was thinking at first, that there might have been another patient who he mistook for Hendrix, but it’s obvious he made the whole story up and I will talk about that in my Bannister series. Only Bannister said Hendrix was “covered in wine”. Siefert said he saw no alcohol on Jimi (only vomit) and Brown only said he had a “bit too much to drink”. A “bit” is not gallons of wine flooding his lungs and covering his body. And Hendrix was drinking wine at Harvey’s and at Kameron’s party which would be slightly over the limit, which is a “bit” like Brown said. So yeah, Bannister made the whole thing up.
As for dear Doctor Bannister, you can’t confirm a man to be dead on arrival who was cold and blue, and then frantically perform half hour wine surging resuscitation attempts trying to remove a plug of vomit first before you suck out wine then trying resuscitation, it doesn’t work that way like tin foil hatters claim. It’s pure nonsense for the gullible and the ignorant. My Bannister series will show all his lies, contradictions, and will debunk more of the nonsense that these kooks try to claim.
Monika mentioned the wine first, then Bannister used it for a defense, and then all the fraudsters used wine for their phony books to make money off of. But not one of them can ever show any evidence of all this wine they claim.
Steam coming from the ears just like in the old cartoons lol. Tin foil hatters seem intent now to push Allen’s aka Aleem’s fake story since all their other claims have failed. Allen’s story is fake as well and it’s hilarious that gullible people will just believe anything they hear.
Albert Allen spoke to rock musician Buzzy Linhart about his witnessing of Monika and Michael together back in the 1970’s and mentioned the full set of photos Monika had laid out on the table back then…I interviewed and spoke to Buzzy and he told me that story too…The photos of Jimi’s last afternoon taken in the Samarkand garden behind the flat were never released to the public by Monika until 1995 when her book came out…Albert lived in Brooklyn and never went to England so he had no way of knowing about that famous set of photos unless he saw them in person…This is undeniable proof that Albert’s witnessing of Michael and Monika plotting together is real because there is no way Albert could have known about those photos unless he witnessed them in person…Albert told me he slowly woke up out of his sleep because he heard a German accent and English accent…He then focused on what they were saying and heard Monika saying the photos she was pointing to could be used to show Jimi was slowly killing himself with drugs because in those photos he looked haggard and worn out and the cause could be claimed to be drug self-destruction…What Albert witnessed unexpectedly was the true relationship between Monika and Michael Jeffery and therefore her true role that morning…The fact Albert described photos that were not released to the public for another 24 years proves that what he witnessed was true…
What we have here is another fake story and a claim with no evidence. This story is hilarious and is a total fraud.
Buzzy Linhart published a story that Devon Wilson called him on the phone to tell him that Jimi OD’d on Tulinals that were in the medicine cabinet at Monika’s flat. So, Buzzy’s story refutes the phony story that Allen aka Aleem is trying to sell for money. Buzzy is stating that Jimi died from a drug overdose in which all the evidence shows.
Allen’s story is another fake sham in order to make money off Hendrix’s name like all these other fraudsters do, using Jeffery as the culprit. Slowly waking up from a sleep at the right moment to hear Jeffery and Monika plotting evil deeds. Give me a friggin’ break. That’s more fake than Tappy Wight’s fake quote.
Jimi Hendrix was already spiraling out of control on drugs in September of 1970. Everybody who knew him stated that fact. Nobody would need photos to claim that “he looked haggard from drug abuse”. That’s why the story Allen says and you sell is fake.
If Allen aka Aleem was credible in any way he would have gone to the authorities in New York to have them both arrested for a crime. But instead, like all the other fraudsters, they never said a peep until it was time to be published in a book in order to make money. Another scam to make money off Jimi.
Remember, Allen aka Aleem is the same fraudster who made up a phony story claiming Jimi said he could have his 2 prized guitars in 1969. So, Allen aka Aleem sued Janie Hendrix on that false claim trying to steal Jimi’s guitars, so he could then auction them off to the highest bidders to make money. Allen is just a two bit con artist trying to keep this phony conspiracy alive for publicity.
Also, Allen aka Aleem’s claim means nothing anyway since Hendrix died of a drug overdose and the pictures of Jimi on his last day shows the ravages of drug abuse.
Buster also never did show any evidence or documentation of wine both in Hendrix’s St. Mary Abbots medical file or in his autopsy report. Where’s all this massive wine that nobody saw. What did Bannister do with it?
This is another feeble attempt to prove a “Hendrix murder” which totally fails right from the get go.
BUSTER says:
October 2, 2019 at 8:45 am
Albert told me he slowly woke up out of his sleep because he heard a German accent and English accent.
Funny how these people always tell you “damaging information” off camera with no evidence.of their claim. You are just making this stuff up like everything else you say.
I can’t believe how gullible Buster appears with all these sensationalist claims one after the other. Like you said Jason the tin foil hatters have now turned their attention to Albert Allen’s book and ditched Tappy Wright but both are as fake as the other. I don’t understand why anyone would be speaking to Buster off camera like he suggests since he really is a no body in the Hendrix scheme of things. Everything that Buster claims is true has turned out to be false. Buster’s lies have no place amongst the truth here. If you really want to know the extent of Monika’s relationship with Jimi just have a look at the photos of Monika in Tony Brown’s book The Last Days where she is looking particularly relaxed and happy for someone who lost her fiancée weeks before. I don’t think anyone who was involved in a murder would be looking like this or have the ability to go through with something as serious as that. Albert Allen’s book will end up in bargain basement bin where it belongs just like Wright’s stupid book selling for $2.50 or better still pulped completely. These books spread nothing but lies.
When one of their claims fails, they look for another to continue the charade. All of Buster’s “evidence” he claims comes from private conversations and off camera claims that are just made up nonsense. He lies about everything to feed his conspiracy. He dropped Tappy’s and Bannister’s phony claims for Allen’s, but Buster doesn’t understand that Allen’s claim is meaningless since there was never any “murder by wine” scenario. Buster still can’t provide any documented evidence proving wine. That’s why his phony tin foil hat conspiracy will always fail.
Jason and myself are far too intelligent to believe anything you peddle Buster. We have already established that Michael Jeffrey was in Spain and Wright’s book is a fraud on a grand scale. Doesn’t it seem strange to you that Albert Allen did not alert the authorities about Michael and Monika but waited decades later to reveal all. He really is a good friend to Jimi isn’t he? What is even more intriguing is the nonsense you believe and accept as the truth and the characters you interview and are drawn to in this saga who just so happen to fit in with your tin foil hatter mentality. Tony Brown mentioned in his book that Jimi did not look particularly well or happy in the photos taken by Monika in the garden of the Samarkand while others like Chas Chandler said that Jimi had never looked better. Jimi died of a lethal dose of Vesparax fully clothed on top of a bed at the Samarkand Hotel with a woman he barely knew who failed to disclose how potent those pills actually were. That is the truth of the matter despite how difficult this may be to accept; tin foil hatters are turning this into something that it is not-a murder case instead of a drug overdose of sleeping pills probably taken with wine although this is not certain. Put it to rest Buster.
Funny how all these so called “witnesses” waited decades to reveal their damaging information in the form of a book for profit that just so happened to come after the phony claims of “The Godfather of Wine”, one ex Doctor Bannister in 1992.
Jason isn’t answering provable information…Instead of answering what was said, Jason switched the topic to Devon’s phone call to Buzzy at Electric Lady the day Jimi died…Get a load of Jason…While he demands strict evidence for everything he then turns around and accepts Devon’s story about the Tuinols without any proof whatsoever…Except that Devon’s story and the non-existent Tuinols have nothing to do with what I was talking about…What I wrote, and Jason made no attempt to honestly answer, was the fact Buzzy was witnessed knowing of that story in the 1970’s…You can ask Joe Viglione who worked with Buzzy on the story…You can also ask Albert Allen who can give you references to the people he told that story to back in the 1970’s…So far I have yet to see Jason make any attempt to honestly answer the fact Monika gave mention in her book (that wasn’t released until 1995) of a visit to Electric Lady Studios to visit Jeffery in the winter of 1971…Albert had no contact with Monika and didn’t know anything about her or her movements…She didn’t publicly divulge that visit to Jeffery at Electric Lady until she told of it in 1995…So for a person who is fabricating a story for money Albert is doing pretty well at hitting on all the confirming points he manages to produce while having no way to know about them…But let’s get back to the main point, after all his diversionary filibuster and specious excuses Jason still hasn’t answered the fact that Albert Allen told of the set of photos from Jimi’s last day at the Samarkand garden back in the 1970’s when he first told Linhart of his experience…Monika lived in England and Albert lived in Brooklyn…Monika did not release those photos to the public until 1995…So Jason still hasn’t made any honest attempt to answer how exactly Albert knew about and described a unique set of photos that no one knew about until 1995 when Monika first made them public in her book?…I’m afraid that is proof, as is the fact Jason takes pains to ignore it and tries to argue his way around it with irrelevancies…The fact Jason can’t answer it directly is why it is proof and it proves that Albert’s witnessing really happened…There’s other proof too that I’m not revealing where Albert had further confirmation…
Albert Allen could not go to the police because him and his brother were cocaine hustlers under Harlem’s black gangster Fat Jack Taylor…It’s all in his book…Besides, what was he going to tell the cops?…That he saw Jeffery and Dannemann talking together and looking at photos???…Jeffery was Intel and pulled off the murder of rock’s top figure…There is simply no way any legal pursuit would be made even if a complaint were filed…Get serious…
Buster I’m really concerned about who you are placing your trust in with these stories and who you have chosen to believe. There is no way of verifying these stories since the main players are dead yet you have chosen to support the more sensationalist claims and back them with your suspicious reasoning. Why only you can answer that. The plain and simple truth is that Michael Jeffrey was in Spain so he could have been responsible for Jimi’s murder and the doctors have confirmed that Jimi died of an overdose of sleeping pills chocking and his own vomit. Having said that how can you then believe that Jimi was murdered when all the evidence points to accidental death. You seem to be in the habit of omitting the facts you don’t care about and embellishing them with your own. How can you then be sure of anything anyone of these characters is telling you. It would seem from your beliefs that you are extremely receptive to claims that cannot be validated or confirmed by anyone. I’m also extremely dubious of your claims that people have spoken to you off camera as if you are and have been a trusted and well known alli to them. As I suggested in an earlier post you really are just a no body in the Hendrix scheme of things trying to put forward these exaggerated claims and beliefs. The reason the Albert Brothers did not go to the authorities with their story is because there was no story to tell. Jason and myself have understood this but you have not been able to grasp this simple fact. You also seem to have trouble differentiating truth from fiction-stories that seem ridiculous and unbelievable to us seem largely credible to you, and this has been the problem with your posts so far. I suggest to you to keep reading what Jason posts here particularly his next couple of posts.
BUSTER says: Jason isn’t answering provable information…Instead of answering what was said, Jason switched the topic to Devon’s phone call to Buzzy at Electric Lady the day Jimi died…Get a load of Jason…While he demands strict evidence for everything he then turns around and accepts Devon’s story about the Tuinols without any proof whatsoever…Except that Devon’s story and the non-existent Tuinols have nothing to do with what I was talking about.
Buster is as clueless as ever with his weak attempt at gaslighting. Buster takes the stories Buzzy sells and when one of Buzzy’s stories contradicts Buster’s phony claims Buster says it’s ‘non-existant’. Buster can’t figure out that Buzzy’s story contradicts the other stories he writes.
BUSTER says: Albert Allen could not go to the police because him and his brother were cocaine hustlers under Harlem’s black gangster Fat Jack Taylor…It’s all in his book…Besides, what was he going to tell the cops?…That he saw Jeffery and Dannemann talking together and looking at photos???…Jeffery was Intel and pulled off the murder of rock’s top figure…There is simply no way any legal pursuit would be made even if a complaint were filed…Get serious…
Always some excuse you make for your phony theory. There is no evidence whatsoever to prove Jeffery was in “Intel”. Buster is now trying to claim a criminal complaint in New York State wouldn’t be taken seriously. Just more nonsense to further an already debunked conspiracy theory.
Where is your documented evidence of wine Buster? Do you think the readers forgot about that? Show some evidence of wine.
Hello Ivana, that is most likely the case. When you question Buster about why the police weren’t involved, he already has a lame excuse. If Allen’s story was told to many people, it would have been reported in the media in the 70’s since Jimi’s friends had access to media or they themselves were in the media. So again, we have a story Buster claims is “important” but never saw the light of day until it was printed in a book decades later. That is why it is fake. Buster carefully chooses his words to appear he has solid evidence. He also fabricates claims and makes stuff up as his “evidence”. When he is challenged to produce documented evidence he ignores it and attacks you for not answering his phony claims. His claims are fake, so he is always able to change his story since it was never real. He then claims you are wrong not answering “his evidence”. That’s how he gets around it and is able to argue his phony conspiracy.
BUSTER says: You can ask Joe Viglione who worked with Buzzy on the story.
Joe Viglione and Buzzy said that Devon Wilson called Buzzy telling him that Jimi OD’d from tulinals in the medicine cabinet so what they write is not credible. Funny how you believe their Allen story but not their Devon Wilson story. Probably cuz it refutes your phony theory. Isn’t that right?
BUSTER says: You can also ask Albert Allen who can give you references to the people he told that story to back in the 1970’s.
So, he told many people in the 70’s about it and it never got out in the press to be told. All these people were silent about too like Sharon Lawrence? LOL
Anybody reading can see how fake this story is. If people were told this story by Allen in the early 70’s, it would have spread like wildfire since Hendrix just died. Someone would have wanted to tell this story and make it public if they were told. That’s what actually happens in real life, not in fantasy like Buster tries to sell you.
BUSTER says: Besides, what was he going to tell the cops?…That he saw Jeffery and Dannemann talking together and looking at photos???
So, you’re now saying Allen’s claim is worthless and is no big deal that wouldn’t warrant a police investigation. Well, there’s something I finally agree with you on. And yet again, you contradict yourself and expose your phony claim to be a total sham.
Hi Jason. Ignoring everything Buster puts out there is the best course of action. I wonder why he has decided to come back on board this forum maybe he was ousted and banned from some others or repeatedly ignored. He is just trying to monopolise the debate and discussion again. He uses the same wording over and over again with anyone who opposes his claims; I’ve noticed he is especially fond of using the word “witness” and “evidence” and the phrase “off camera” in order to make his bogus claims seem more credible. He particularly likes to use derogatory language with anyone who opposes his views as a means of getting them to stop posting. It’s about time he stopped with his boring and unsubstantiated claims/lies.
Hello Ivana,
Buster still can’t prove any evidence of wine but is now moved on to Albert Allen’s claim. Buster dismissed Allen going to the police like it was no big deal. So with that, the Allen claim is basically worthless. His “evidence” is only claims and made up theories for which he can never prove. Conversing with him is a waste of time cuz he changes what he says and ignores the evidence that defeats his claims. There was no wine at the flat but he still claims a wine drowning and he says I ignore “his evidence”. What evidence? He still doesn’t have any. He can just babble away posting his phony claims hat amount to nothing.
Jason doesn’t seem to realize that his perspective is not the ruling perspective here and this evidence is not as much up to opinion and conjecture as his ignorant viewpoint would like…If Jason bothered to do the research I have done he would realize that Buzzy’s being told of Albert’s witnessing happened back in the 1970’s…And Buzzy wasn’t the only person Albert told…Jason has yet to admit that there were many witnesses to Albert telling Buzzy this story way back in the 1970’s…Joe Vigilone then took it over and became its main proponent…Because Buzzy was a Hendrix insider he heard the story from Albert…Jason doesn’t seem to understand that there is no questioning of whether or not it happened…There are too many witnesses to it being told by both men back in the 1970’s…What Jason is asking us to accept is that an internet poster in 2019 and his denial is now the main source and we can just ignore two main friends of Jimi in Albert Allen and Buzzy Linhart and say that both men are making up a crazy story…And we can ignore their documented and witnessed discussion of Albert Allen’s witnessing…That’s crazy…Jason still hasn’t answered the fact that Buzzy and several others witnessed Albert mentioning the Samarkand garden photos back in the 1970’s, two decades before they were publicly released by Monika…Jason is taking pains to avoid answering for the fact this is undeniable proof that Albert Allen’s witnessing happened because there is simply no way Albert could know about those unreleased photos and speak about them unless he had seen them in person…As long as Jason refuses to honestly answer that this discussion is over and I have proven my case…Any probing of this and investigation of Albert’s telling it only confirms it more…Jason wishes it was as easily dismissable as he wants but any simple look in to this proves it is true and Jason hasn’t come anywhere near to answering it…Look at his responses…He is avoiding answering how Albert could know about those photos decades before they were released…
BUSTER says: Jeffery had waterboarded Jimi to death with wine….
BUSTER says: In the long-run whether Jeffery was actually at the Samarkand or not doesn’t matter. He arranged the whole thing and probably told Tappy Wright he was there in order to cover for accomplices involved in a much deeper intel plot.
JASON says: Nice story change, dickhead.
It’s more a question of why you are believing this nonsense. Just look at the people you have placed your faith in the past, Buster. Doesn’t it strike you as odd that Allen was witness to a conversation of murder of one of his best friends supposedly and failed to alert the authorities despite his dubious background in Harlem. Any normal person would have done this considering who the murderer was and who the victim was. I really doubt there were any other witnesses as you claim as this story sounds incredibly bogus from the start. As was stated repeatedly Michael Jeffrey was in Majorca Spain end of story. Please spare us your make believe opinions in the future, your defaming of innocent people and more importantly try and be more selective with the people you side with in this story. I repeat Michael Jeffrey was in Spain therefore he could not have murdered Jimi. None of the people who really matter in this story, the ones who had a close relationship to Jimi at the height of his fame, buy into this nonsense and more importantly the earlier biographies state the real cause of death and none of them mention wine as cause of death. Allen has decided to sit on this bombshell story for decades before revealing it to coincide with the release of his book which I doubt anyone bothered to read. This is just an attempt on his part to cash in on his “friendship” with Jimi hoping to sell more books; it seems only you Buster have failed to see and understand this.
Buster doesn’t seem to realize that he already dismissed Allen’s phony claim.
BUSTER says: Besides, what was he going to tell the cops?…That he saw Jeffery and Dannemann talking together and looking at photos???
Buster is telling us that Allen’s claim is useless and is not worth reporting to the police. If Allen’s claim is as serious as Buster claims, then the police would have been contacted to investigate a murder conspiracy. Buster says there was nothing important to Allen’s claim with his dismissive answer.
Buster wants us to believe that Allen wouldn’t get the police involved in 1970 or have his friends in the media report his story (back then) if it was as serious as he claims. Allen had access to people in the media, but yet nothing was ever reported in the 70’s about this story. Not until decades later in a book did Allen make his claim. Same exact pattern with all these people. Report nothing in the 70’s and wait decades later to print in a book as “startling information”.
Buster just wants us to believe Allen told many people and it stayed under wraps until it was printed in a book decades later. We have all seen this movie before and already know how it turns out with the same fake ending. Someone would have went to the media with this story in the 70’s if this story was real and if that many people were told. That’s how things work in real life. The fact this story never reached the media in the 70’s shows it is fake. People don’t stay quiet with stories like this, that is just human nature. But Buster wants to gaslight and create an alternate reality. Cue the excuses and same argument from Buster.
Where is your documented evidence of wine Buster? Are you ignoring the basis of your phony murder theory that you can’t prove?
Buster still can’t provide any documented evidence proving any wine, so he now tries to use this phony claim by Allen instead. Buster still can’t answer why no police were contacted to investigate or why Allen’s story was never reported in the 70’s.
BUSTER says: Jason doesn’t seem to realize that his perspective is not the ruling perspective here and this evidence is not as much up to opinion and conjecture as his ignorant viewpoint would like…If Jason bothered to do the research I have done he would realize that Buzzy’s being told of Albert’s witnessing happened back in the 1970’s…And Buzzy wasn’t the only person Albert told…Jason has yet to admit that there were many witnesses to Albert telling Buzzy this story way back in the 1970’s…
Many witnesses Buster says. Many more people who would have heard and told this story to others. Many people who would have told this story to reporters in the 70’s. Funny how this story never was talked about in the 70’s until a claim was printed in a book decades later.
Buster doesn’t seem to realize that when people are told a story they spread it around to other people. If a story like this was told by Allen to many witnesses, then someone in the media would have reported it in the 70’s. The fact this story was never printed until decades later shows it’s not credible. If this story was legitimate, friends of Hendrix would have made sure it was reported in the media in the 70’s. Now we will get more excuses by Buster telling us why nobody could tell the media or how I’m not answering the questions.
Buster again avoids giving the readers an answer that we all seek. Where is your documented evidence of the wine you claim? Buster fails to answer this simple question since there is no wine cuz that is the basis of the entire case.
What Albert Allen has done is he has seized the opportunity to invent his own story about Jimi being murdered by Michael Jeffrey after reading Tappy Wright’s book. But he conveniently forgot to mention that this book is a complete hoax and that Michael was in Spain at the time. Allen also never mentioned this to the Hendrix Family or to Kathy during her investigation or more importantly to the inquest held after Jimi’s immediate death. The Bros also feature in a few interviews but failed to speak up then but felt it was OK to tell all decades later. What exactly was said to Buzzy and the other witnesses since this murder never occurred in real life but only in the imaginations of some. Where are the Mafia and black gangsters now? I know inhabiting the same parallel planet as Tappy Wright, Dr. Bannister, the Allen Twins and our gullible foolish “friend” Buster. These people need you Buster because you help spread their fallacies and myths but would instantly dislike Jason and myself because we do not fall for this nonsense.
It is factually incorrect to say “Not until decades later did Albert make his claim in a book”…That statement is factually incorrect and goes against a provable record…Jason will not make phone calls to Joe Viglione like I did because he isn’t interested in the truth as long as he can nay-say it safely from here and safely from the facts…I also met and interviewed Buzzy Linhart…They can tell you Albert first told of his witnessing back in the 1970’s…Which means Jason is seriously truth-challenged because he is refusing to admit that proves Albert’s witnessing is real because that story was documented as mentioning Monika’s Samarkand garden photos several decades before any knowledge of them was released to the public…Jason has yet to give a straight, honest, or direct answer to the fact Albert could not have mentioned that famous set of photos taken by Monika of Jimi at the Samarkand that last day of his life unless he had seen them in person since nobody knew of them until 1995 when Monika released them in her book…It is provable fact that when Buzzy heard that story in the 1970’s it contained mention of those photos and since Monika did not release those photos to the public until 1995 there is no way Albert could have known about them unless he saw them in person…Jason is dishonestly trying to rationalize to himself that some simple research in to Buzzy and his claim won’t easily prove this to be correct – which it will, and will therefore show that Albert is telling the truth and it happened, and happened the way he told it…I mean just step back and look at the bigger picture…Jason is an obvious nay-sayer who will ignore any good evidence you show and seek denials in everything…Albert is about as solid a Hendrix person as is possible and would never get involved in any crazy hoax involving Jimi…He has no reason to lie and he was telling this story long before he ever put any book together…He has other serious Hendrix people to confirm this and never has any credible Hendrix insider doubted him or his story…And there are a lot of people scrutinizing Jimi stories out there…Buzzy too is a Hendrix insider who had no reason to lie and would not get involved in any crazy Hendrix hoax…So what we have here is two serious Hendrix people vs an internet poster…And that internet poster is refusing to acknowledge easily-provable facts…Jason’s view of Albert Allen as a crazy hoaxer that makes things up to make money is something that persons close to the situation and Hendrix circles would strenuously reject and Jason would never get away with that face to face with them…That viewpoint only exists within the disingenuous confines of Jason’s posts and you won’t find it anywhere else…
Jason has also failed to make any credible answer to the fact Monika wrote, in that 1995 book, that she visited Michael Jeffery at Electric Lady in January or February 1971…So since that admission wasn’t made until 1995, and Albert was not connected to any knowledge of Monika or her doings, that also shows veracity to his story since it is at the time that Albert told of in his original accounts…What a coincidence that Monika is on record as having visited Jeffery right at the same time Albert mentioned in that story…Jason ignores this…
I thank Jason for the easy win here because anyone who reads these posts will see Jason badly struggling to come up with an excuse for the irrefutable proof Albert’s having seen the Samarkand garden photos decades before they were ever released is…It is proof that Albert’s witnessing is real and Jason publicly can’t answer it…
Funny how all these so called “insiders” never made the story known in the 70’s giving real inside information when it was all relevant. Even Jimi’s dad Al never even knew of it. Guess all these great “insiders” forgot to tell the most important person to tell about it, Jimi’s own father. Find any evidence of wine yet Buster? Readers want to know. Buster can use a claim from Allen pretending that solves his case, but Buster’s ignorance can’t be ignored that every piece of evidence shows Jimi died of a drug overdose with real forensics, not phony claims that he promotes.
BUSTER says: Because Buzzy was a Hendrix insider he heard the story from Albert…Jason doesn’t seem to understand that there is no questioning of whether or not it happened….There are too many witnesses to it being told by both men back in the 1970’s.
So hundreds of people were told of this story by Buzzy and Allen in the 70’s and it never got leaked to the press? Smart people ain’t buying that since they know gossip and stories always make the press. Especially since Buzzy and Allen were in the music business and hung out with other musicians this story would have been well known. Musicians who were told “Allen’s story” would have told that story in interviews they gave. Also, all the hangers-on that surrounded Hendrix would have been told this story by Allen since he associated with them. They would have been hungry for a big pay day giving juicy gossip to a magazine or to write in a book. Even a t.v. appearance since Hendrix just died and it would have been big press. And if hundreds of people knew then hundreds more would know as word spread until it got to the thousands. It would have been bound to have made headline news with all these people knowing being told by Allen and Buzzy. Funny how Kathy never knew or Jimi’s dad or family had no knowledge of it. Also, people like Bob Levine, Chas Chandler, Mitch Mitchell, Noel Redding were never told of this story either. Why didn’t they know if all these hundreds of other people were told about it? Do you honestly think if all these people knew that Jimi’s bandmates, producer, and manager wouldn’t have been told either? People reading this can just shake their heads once again knowing full well this story doesn’t add up to how real life works. If Allen’s story was real, it would have been big news in the 70’s all over the place, not decades later written in a chapter of a book designed to make money. People had a chance to tell and sell this huge story in the 70’s if it was real. And you think they wouldn’t? Give me a friggin break.
You are just proving my point Jason…All the things you say are all secondary (and therefore irrelevant) to the FACT some simple tracing and investigation can verify that Albert Allen told Buzzy of his witnessing back in the 1970’s…You still haven’t given a credible answer to the FACT that Albert mentioned those Samarkand garden photos in his original account in the 1970’s…And you still haven’t given credible recognition to the FACT that since Monika did not release those photos until 1995 when her book came out that Albert had no way to know about them unless he witnessed them in person…
You’re just proving my point for me Jason by trying to get away with irrelevant rationalizations instead of directly answering the facts…Albert mentioned the Samarkand photos decades before he had any means of knowing about them…That proves he was there and what he witnessed was real…You are obviously running to extensive fantasy scenarios because of the pathetic simple fact you can’t give a straight answer to this evidence…The fact you can’t answer it shows why it is proof…I consider this won at this point…I thank you for the easy victory…
BUSTER says: I thank you for the easy victory.
Buster claims a fake victory like he abandoned his fake wine claim.
BUSTER says: All the things you say are all secondary (and therefore irrelevant) to the FACT some simple tracing and investigation can verify that Albert Allen told Buzzy of his witnessing back in the 1970’s.
Buster clams hundreds of people knew of Albert’s story in the 70’s but nobody closest to Jimi even knew about it nor was it ever reported except for a book.
BUSTER says: It is factually incorrect to say “Not until decades later did Albert make his claim in a book”…That statement is factually incorrect and goes against a provable record.
Factually incorrect you say? Ok, well, show the provable record to the readers and to me.
Prove where Albert or Buzzy went on the record in the 70’s proving Albert’s claim to newspapers, magazines, radio, and t.v.
Prove where one of the “many people” who was told this claim in the 70’s talked about it in a radio or tv interview.
If all these “many people” and Hendrix insiders knew of this claim in the 70’s then it will be easy to pull up an article of Albert’s claim from the 70’s.
If it is factually incorrect as you claim, prove where Albert’s claim was printed in a magazine or newspaper in the 70’s before it was printed decades later in a book.
Hi Jason, in my many interviews, on tape, with Buzzy Linhart there was no mention of Albert. I have credible information from many sources but I’m not posting it here. There are many interviews I have to listen to and re-listen to, but the sources are very credible. Always follow the money, Jason. Who would have motive and who would have the resources. Start there. All I’m going to say for now.
Hi Joev,
Which many tapes are you talking about?
Buzzy Linhart specifically stated that Jimi Hendrix died from a tulinal drug overdose confirmed by Devon Wilson. This account was published in his book. Buzzy thought it was accurate to confirm. That account refutes Albert’s “serious” claim.
Have fun listening to all those tapes, but I prefer to follow the real forensic evidence that proves Jimi Hendrix died from a Vesparax drug overdose like the autopsy record states.
Dig out your old dusty tapes and listen to them yet Buster? It’s been a long time now.
We all know this was you impersonating Joe Viglione.
You are a fraud and a sad troll stooping that low to impersonate an author for your shitty debunked hoax.
Hoax on hoaxer!
Buster aka Brian Doyle was trying to impersonate journalist and critic Joe Viglione lol. Still hilarious.
Buster used “JoeV” so he couldn’t get in trouble for impersonation.
Tin foil hatters claim they have a forensic argument to make in their Hendrix “murder theory”. But yet, they can never produce any actual forensic evidence to prove their claim. We hear about “5 bottles of wine” and flooded stomach and lungs but not one single shred of evidence can b brought out as proof.
So, we get a never ending argument based on claims and no evidence. Then we have people telling stories decades later but never said a word when it was relevant in 1970.
Interestingly enough, Jimi’s family never even knew of these claims when these events supposedly happened. if someone is going to make a claim, they need to back it up with evidence. And after Tappy Wright admitted he lied in his book, all these other claims all sound the same.
Hendrix’s former true love asks: How could they do this to my Jimi?
KATHY ETCHINGHAM was the major love of Jimi Hendrix’s life.
Sunday Express
By Sean Egan
8 September 2013
Not only was she the iconic Sixties guitarist’s common-law wife throughout virtually all of his years of stardom, she inspired one of his most beautiful love songs, The Wind Cries Mary.
She has endeavoured always to preserve the integrity of Hendrix’s reputation and musical legacy. In 1997, it was she who organised the unveiling of an English Heritage plaque to mark the location of one of her and Hendrix’s London homes.
With the premiere this weekend at the Toronto International Film Festival of Hendrix biopic All Is By My Side, however, Kathy is concerned that that legacy is about be traduced and besmirched by people co-opting Hendrix for their own ends.
When Kathy met the Seattle-born Hendrix on September 23, 1966, he was close to destitute. Apart from a chipped, second-hand Stratocaster guitar, she recalls his possessions: “One bag with a change of clothes, some hair rollers and a jar of Valderma ‘cos he got spots at that time.”
Hendrix had just arrived in Britain in the company of Chas Chandler. The former bassist of the disbanded Animals had decided on a management career. When he saw Hendrix’s act in a New York club he was mesmerised by his stage charisma and lightning-fingered virtuosity. Chandler was convinced he could transform Hendrix, then 23, from the jobbing, anonymous backing musician he had been into a star. Moreover, he felt he had just the song with which to do it: a dark murder tale called Hey Joe that had already been a hit in the US.
Studio time was promptly booked. Kathy recalls: “It was all done very quickly because the studio was costing money. Chas [shouted] at me for opening the door when the red light was on. It blew the sound and they had to do it again. Ooh, God, I nearly died.”
That Kathy was present at Hey Joe’s recording was not unusual. She had hooked up with Hendrix at celebrity hangout The Scotch of St James, where until recently she had been resident DJ, when on his first night in the country he performed a couple of songs from said club’s stage. From that night, they were a couple. “Some people just click,” Kathy says, citing their mutually powerful personalities and difficult childhoods as bonding points
The brooding, classy “Hey Joe” (a top 10 record for The Jimi Hendrix Experience that year) efficiently announced Hendrix’s presence to the world, but for Chandler it was not enough.
“I can remember Chas saying to him: ‘You have got to write your own stuff Jimi because otherwise you’re paying royalties to other people’,” says Kathy. “Chas bought Jimi an A4 slab of writing paper and he started writing songs. He was twanging on his guitar but it wasn’t plugged into anything. He obviously had a melody but it was in his mind.”
Astoundingly, within months this songwriting novice had written and recorded Purple Haze, not only a phantasmagorical single but one that smashed notions of what was considered commercial. Hendrix promoted it wearing a vintage blue and gold military jacket, as he had with other records.
Kathy remembers it for a more mundane reason: “Walking down the street we got stopped by the police. They said: ‘Soldiers died wearing that. Take it off’.”
When Hendrix was not watching Coronation Street and The Frost Report on the television, or playing board games and listening to music in one of their shared London flats, his creativity was in overdrive. In the space of 15 months, the Experience released epoch-marking albums Are You Experienced, Axis: Bold As Love and Electric Ladyland, the latter a double album.
With Hendrix immersed in his music, Kathy took care of the money now pouring in: “He liked to have cash rather than cheques. He sent me to the bank to get three or four thousand pounds. That was a hell of a lot of money in those days and one of the people from the bank escorted me back over with it.”
This innocents-in-paradise lifestyle was destined not to last. “It all started falling apart when they were in America on tour in 1968,” says Kathy. “Chas said he was his own worst enemy. Instead of getting on with making records, making money, he was just fooling around and laying down things that Chas didn’t think were commercial.”
When Chandler resigned, Hendrix was left to the mercies of his co-manager Mike Jeffery and to his even shadier hangers-on.
He was being followed around by horrible people who were giving him stuff,” says Kathy.
“When people are on drugs, they become somebody else. He aged so quickly. He was being overworked and he contributed to that by going into the studio and staying up all night. By 1969, I wanted something much more stable.”
Not only had he lost his mentor and his girlfriend but even Hendrix’s muse seemed to desert him. There was no Hendrix product in 1969, while 1970 brought only the flat, drab Band Of Gypsys concert album. Even as he assumed the position of world’s highest-paid stage performer, he was futilely chopping and changing band personnel. “Never gelled,” says Kathy of Hendrix’s post-Experience groups. “It obviously was not happening and he was getting more and more depressed about things. He was just bumbling along by 1970.”
September 18 of that year brought the shocking news of Hendrix’s death from a sleeping pill overdose. He was 27. Kathy later conducted extensive investigations into the chaotic circumstances surrounding Hendrix’s demise. “He fell into the hands of a crazy fan he met on the Tuesday. He was dead by Friday.”
A Monika Dannemann gave Hendrix some powerful sleeping pills, which Kathy says she claimed were “very, very weak”.
“So of course, Jimi thinks: ‘I’ll take nine of these ‘cos I’ve taken some uppers’.”
She is even more appalled by the casting of rap artist Andre “3000” Benjamin as Hendrix: “Andre and Hayley Atwell are much older than Jimi and I were and it shows.” Critics have said that as well as being 38, Benjamin far more resembles another man he has been rumoured to be scheduled to play: Sammy Davis Jnr.
Of more concern to Kathy than those anomalies are derogatory publicity descriptions of her (“groupie” was withdrawn when she complained), mentions of the “class and racial politics of the Sixties” that “illuminate Jimi’s hippie perspective” (“we didn’t have any conversations about black issues and Sixties politics”) and the implication that model Linda Keith may have been the most important woman in Hendrix’s life.
Kathy dismisses a recent claim that Hendrix was murdered on the orders of Mike Jeffery to cash in on an insurance policy after Hendrix refused to renew his management contract. “I’ve seen the contract. It had two and a half more years to run.”
Kathy lived what she calls a “perfectly normal” life afterwards. She has been married for 37 years, has two adult sons, is retired and is a “keen gardener”.
All Is By My Side is written and directed by American John Ridley. Kathy is to be immortalised in it by Hayley Atwell but she is less than thrilled. “I wrote them an email when I first heard about it saying if you want any help don’t hesitate to contact me. They didn’t reply.”
Kathy, who habitually dressed in conservative suits in the Sixties, is derisive of advance stills showing Atwell in “gear bird” go-go boots and dayglo clothing. “It’s got Austin Powers written all over it. I would not be seen dead in anything like that.”
While Keith did champion Hendrix’s talents to many including, crucially, Chandler, the film’s claims of Kathy, Keith and Hendrix forming some sort of triangle befuddles Kathy: “Jimi told me he had only known Linda Keith for about a week cumulatively. They can’t possibly have us on the screen together because I’ve never spoken a word to Linda Keith.”
Courtesy of legal threats and corrections fired the producers’ way by Kathy’s lawyers, the script was in a constant state of revision. The Hendrix estate has refused permission for Ridley to use any of his music, with the inevitable result that Hendrix will look like a covers artist.
Yet what seems a farcical concoction is set to receive wide exposure: a full-scale theatrical release was part of the conditions of its Irish tax subsidy.
Hendrix’s status as a titanic rock star will never evaporate. Nearly five decades on, the world still worships at the altar of his musical brilliance and innovation. Kathy, though, is disquieted by the potential effect on the hitherto uninitiated by All Is By My Side.
“A lot of people will go and see it who have never read any of the biographies and they will think it’s gospel truth,” she says with a shudder, “I don’t want it to fundamentally change history.”
Jimi Hendrix 1942-1970
October 15, 1970
Rolling Stone
According to Eric Burdon [The Animals, War], Hendrix left behind for the girlfriend in whose apartment he died what Burdon called a “suicide note” which was a poem several pages in length. The poem is now in the possession of Burdon, the last musician with whom Hendrix played before he died.
Said Burdon: “The poem just says the things Hendrix has always been saying, but to which nobody ever listened. It was a note of goodbye and a note of hello. I don’t think Jimi committed suicide in the conventional way. He just decided to exit when he wanted to.”
“I don’t believe it was suicide,” answered Michael Jeffery, Jimi’s personal manager. “I just don’t believe Jimi Hendrix left Eric Burdon his legacy for him to carry on. Jimi Hendrix was a very unique individual.
“I’ve been going through a whole stack of papers, poems and songs that Jimi had written, and I could show you 20 of them that could be interpreted as a suicide note,” he continued.
Speaking with Jeffery on another phone extension, Michael Goldstein, Jimi’s publicity agent, said, “A lot of foolish things will be said in the next few weeks by people who considered themselves close to Jimi Hendrix; they will not be saying them for Jimi; they will be saying them for themselves.”
Both Jeffery and Goldstein said that Burdon was never that close to Hendrix, and also noted that Burdon and his current manager, Steve Gold, have a lawsuit in the courts against Jeffery, Burdon’s former manager.
Hendrix had spent Thursday evening, September 17th, at the Samarkand Hotel flat of Monika Danneman, a German painter. She found him in a coma Friday morning and called an ambulance. The ambulance rushed to the hotel on Landsdowne Crescent, in London’s Nottinghill Gate district, and took him to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital, where he was pronounced dead on arrival at 11:45 a.m., London time.
Police said the sleeping pills were missing from a bottle in Miss Danneman’s flat, which she had rented in mid-August for six weeks, and that Hendrix had taken some when he retired the night before. They took the rest of the pills as evidence.
“He never said to me he wanted to change management,” Jeffery replied to these statements. “What happened was, both of us were expanding in areas, and at certain times he needed very close attention. There was a time when he wanted to expand the group, and the thing was, half my energies were in the studio and other things, and I didn’t have time to devote energies fully to helping expand the group.
“Both he and I felt that the three-way function of manager – artist – agent was quite likely to fall apart, because the times are different than they once were in show business. People outside the circle mistook this for discontent, but it wasn’t, because Jimi was intelligent and bright enough. If he wanted to split, he would have split.
“As far as being artistically frustrated, Jimi had an incredible genius about him, and the common thing with most artists of that caliber is that they are constantly artistically frustrated,” Jeffery added.
This quote by Michael Goldstein is worth repeating again in case you missed it
“Speaking with Jeffery on another phone extension, Michael Goldstein, Jimi’s publicity agent, said, “A lot of foolish things will be said in the next few weeks by people who considered themselves close to Jimi Hendrix; they will not be saying them for Jimi; they will be saying them for themselves.”
Michael Goldstein is sure right about that. A lot of foolish things are still being said 49 years later by people who considered themselves close to Jimi Hendrix; they will not be saying them for Jimi; they will be saying them for themselves.”
People still trying to cash in on Jimi’s name with phony claims is exactly what Michael Goldstein was talking about.
I haven’t heard this quote before by Michael Goldstein but it’s just as relevant today as it was back then. It’s almost as if he predicted what was to come in the future-all these dubious claims and characters that surfaced later but didn’t dare make any accusations against anyone to their face probably afraid of being sued for defamation but waited until they died so they could not defend the accusations made against them. Tin foil hatters then come out of the woodwork and spread their vicious scenarios.
Michael Jeffery and Goldstein both spoke with Rolling Stone magazine in October of 1970 about Jimi. They both gave interviews to other sources and I’m in the process of obtaining them. Tin foil hatters won’t like it too much lol.
Ivana, that sure was a true quote by Goldstein in 1970 and is even more true today.
Tappy Wright said to Bob Levine, “they are all dead so who is going to challenge me.”
Same with Albert and all these other characters, the people they accuse can’t refute their claims after they waited until they were dead to make them.
Goldstein was right and probably had a good idea of who the culprits would be.
The way Jeffery talked highly of Jimi and praised him shows he was close with him. Also, did you read what Jeffery said about Jimi? He said “If he wanted to split, he would have split.”
There goes the phony murder motive tin foil hatters use since Jeffery’s quote shows he was never fired by Hendrix.
Trolls always need to maintain control of the narrative otherwise it will quickly be shown that they are losing badly…In Jason’s case anyone can see when I called his bluff and got Joe Viglione to respond in person Jason’s reaction was to immediately change the subject and divert away from the previous subject matter and the questions he himself asked…As soon as Vigilone showed up and said he has all this on tape and can verify it Jason’s first move is to retreat to the most dishonest of arguments that try to run and hide in a ridiculous oversimplification in order to escape the evidence he called for but couldn’t answer when shown…What Jason is doing here is trying to escape having to admit that once Joe gets his tapes out and listens to the interview with Buzzy he’ll learn of the date when Buzzy first heard Albert’s story…And that date will be in the 1970’s when Buzzy first heard it…Jason is flagrantly dishonest because he knows that he called for evidence that Buzzy heard Albert’s story prior to 1995…When the man with that evidence shows up Jason switches the subject entirely to his weak speculations while publicly running from the hard evidence he called for…And that is without even going to Albert himself whom I’m sure has much better verification than anybody…
Jason is lying when he says I have shown no evidence…If anyone reads this thread I have made a court room level case based on barbiturate science that proves the barbiturate did not kill Jimi…I have proven that London Coroner’s Office Pathologist Rufus Crompton showed that Jimi died no later than 5:30am due to the undigested rice found in his stomach at autopsy…That means Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 to 2 hours tops and that wasn’t either enough time or barbiturate to cause an overdose in a person with Jimi’s famous tolerance…As with the evidence above of Buzzy’s hearing Albert Allen’s story before the photos were released, Jason did the same thing with that barbiturate science as he did with Buzzy…He ignored it, switched the subject, and trolled it with repeated accusations of my not showing evidence, even though the evidence was right there and unanswered…
I think most credible people will see by now that Jason is an unfiltered internet troll who shouldn’t be taken seriously and simply repeats “You have no evidence” to whatever he is shown…
Buster would get laughed out of court using phony claims as evidence. The judge would ask you where you got your evidence and you would say Tappy Wrights book. Then the judge would say “Case Dismissed”.
Having a claim on tape is not evidence. There is no evidence to prove his claim.
Same old stories with Buster’s so called forensics talking about rice. Buster still has no idea how the rice destroys his phony theory.
If Albert is credible, have him show some real evidence of his claim and not the usual “Back in 1970 I saw this.”
If there were hundreds of people in the 70’s that were told of Albert’s claim, it would have made the press and even Jimi’s father would have known. And yet none of that ever happened. So, that claim stands on very shaky ground.
A claim is a claim until you can prove evidence.
Yes Buster, the testimony from the Ambulance men refutes you whole claim since they never witnessed any wine. I provided that as real evidence.
BUSTER says: In Jason’s case anyone can see when I called his bluff and got Joe Viglione to respond in person Jason’s reaction was to immediately change the subject and divert away from the previous subject matter and the questions he himself asked…As soon as Vigilone showed up and said he has all this on tape and can verify it Jason’s first move is to retreat to the most dishonest of arguments that try to run and hide in a ridiculous oversimplification in order to escape the evidence he called for but couldn’t answer when shown…What Jason is doing here is trying to escape having to admit that once Joe gets his tapes out and listens to the interview with Buzzy he’ll learn of the date when Buzzy first heard Albert’s story…
JASON says: LMAO. Buster the troll got caught impersonating Joe Vigilone as he used “Joev” for the name in Buster’s same writing style. You are a joke.
Jason is now trying to pad the thread with irrelevant official story media articles but he is doing it in order to hide the fact he called for evidence that Buzzy heard Albert’s story back in the 1970’s but then when the source showed up and verified it Jason switched the subject and ran and never offered any honest response to the evidence he called for…
BUSTER says:
October 4, 2019 at 3:38 pm
Jason is now trying to pad the thread with irrelevant official story media articles but he is doing it in order to hide the fact he called for evidence that Buzzy heard Albert’s story back in the 1970’s but then when the source showed up and verified it Jason switched the subject and ran and never offered any honest response to the evidence he called for…
If Buster hasn’t noticed, I’ve been posting legitimate articles that refutes his phony claims since the end of August. All these articles are relevant, that come from legitimate sources and from legitimate publications from 1970. Not phony claims Buster talks about post 1992.
Perhaps Buster can post an article from a legitimate source from 1970 that supports Albert Allen’s claim from either Albert or Buzzy?
If Buster hasn’t noticed, I’ve been posting legitimate articles that refutes his phony claims since the end of August. All these articles are relevant, that come from legitimate sources and from legitimate publications from 1970. Not phony claims Buster talks about post 1992.
Perhaps Buster can post an article from a legitimate source from 1970 that supports Albert Allen’s claim from either Albert or Buzzy?
Buster, how about an article from the 70’s that details Albert’s claim?
Can you post an interview with Buzzy or Albert from the 70’s that details and proves Albert’s claim?
Can you post an article from the 70’s where “many of the witnesses” that were told of Albert’s claim spoke to the press about it?
After that, post some documented evidence that proves of all the gallons of wine you claim was inside Hendrix.
You have to stop making claims Buster and start posting some real documented evidence. Like Jimi’s hospital medical file that proves he had “a hardened plug of vomit” removed from his throat or had a 20 minute wine suctioning attempt done. And documented evidence of 5 bottles of wine removed. If your claims are as real as you say, this would all be written down in Hendrix’s medical file that it actually happened. The autopsy report would also show that those prodcedures were done.
Post your evidence Buster to prove your clams.
Jason all the recent legitimate articles that you posted here I am familiar with as I read them back in the 70’s. Michael Jeffrey was upset that Jimi could not get through to him in Majorca Spain because of a savage storm verified by Trixie Sullivan and Jim Marron. Michael was also visibly upset at Jimi’s funeral unable to leave his car. How could he then be accused of murdering Jimi if he wasn’t even in London at the time. There is no why for us to verify what Albert has said as only a small number of people are familiar with his claims in contrast to the high number of people interviewed shortly after Jimi died who were directly involved with Jimi at the height of his fame. There were no claims made back then of murder by waterboarding with wine or any suggestions that Jimi was murdered by Michael or Monika. These claims simply did not exist back then but surfaced decades later with the release of a fraudulent book by Tappy Wright and stories by Albert Allen and Dr.Bannister. Put simply Jimi died of a lethal dosage of Vesparax verified by a highly respected and experienced pathologist and legitimised at the inquest in London. The ambulance officers witnessed only vomit and not copious amounts of red wine at the scene that morning. More importantly the Hendrix family do not believe that Jimi was murdered if they did then they would have investigated Albert Allen’s claims in the same way Kathy Etchingham did back in London with her dossier to the Attorney General. Regardless of these significant facts and findings some people on this thread are still clinging onto the belief that Jimi was murdered despite the substantial evidence proving otherwise.
You’re right Ivana, and Jeffery spoke with the media quite a lot in 1970. A cold blooded murderer wouldn’t take the time. Jeffery also took great care in producing and compiling Jimi’s unreleased music into posthumous albums.
If Albert’s story was told to many people in the 70’s and to “Hendrix Insiders” there is no way that story wouldn’t have been leaked to the press by someone. And not told until it was printed in a book decades later? Same as all the other claims. Same pattern too. Not a word until decades later printed in a book designed to make money. Phony as a 3 dollar bill.
If Albert’s claim was important, it wouldn’t be on a tape somewhere, it would have been reported and investigated in 1970 or thereafter as a serious crime. Post an article or interview from the 70’s regarding Albert’s claim.
BUSTER says: Trolls always need to maintain control of the narrative otherwise it will quickly be shown that they are losing badly…In Jason’s case anyone can see when I called his bluff and got Joe Viglione to respond in person Jason’s reaction was to immediately change the subject and divert away from the previous subject matter and the questions he himself asked…As soon as Vigilone showed up and said he has all this on tape and can verify it Jason’s first move is to retreat to the most dishonest of arguments that try to run and hide in a ridiculous oversimplification in order to escape the evidence he called for but couldn’t answer when shown…What Jason is doing here is trying to escape having to admit that once Joe gets his tapes out and listens to the interview with Buzzy he’ll learn of the date when Buzzy first heard Albert’s story…And that date will be in the 1970’s when Buzzy first heard it…Jason is flagrantly dishonest because he knows that he called for evidence that Buzzy heard Albert’s story prior to 1995…When the man with that evidence shows up Jason switches the subject entirely to his weak speculations while publicly running from the hard evidence he called for…And that is without even going to Albert himself whom I’m sure has much better verification than anybody.
Jason says: If Albert’s claim was real and was told to as many people as you say, then Albert’s claim would have been reported in the press by a legitimate source 49 years ago. It wouldn’t be on some tape, where “Joev” has to dig through more tapes to find it. This claim would have been serious enough to be reported in the press and the police would have investigated it. This “story” never came out until decades later in a book, which would be impossible if the claim was well known by many people in the early 70’s.
Same old claims from Buster using personal opinion instead of real evidence. Buster talks again about undigested rice in Hendrix’s stomach. Buster still has no clue how the rice destroys his phony murder theory.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying when he says I have shown no evidence…If anyone reads this thread I have made a court room level case based on barbiturate science that proves the barbiturate did not kill Jimi…I have proven that London Coroner’s Office Pathologist Rufus Crompton showed that Jimi died no later than 5:30am due to the undigested rice found in his stomach at autopsy…That means Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 to 2 hours tops and that wasn’t either enough time or barbiturate to cause an overdose in a person with Jimi’s famous tolerance…As with the evidence above of Buzzy’s hearing Albert Allen’s story before the photos were released, Jason did the same thing with that barbiturate science as he did with Buzzy…He ignored it, switched the subject, and trolled it with repeated accusations of my not showing evidence, even though the evidence was right there and unanswered.
Jason says: All you state for “your evidence” is that “Jimi couldn’t die from a barbiturate overdose cuz he had a famous tolerance”. That is only your opinion. That is not evidence. No doctor in the world would say what you just said. So no, I am not lying.
The vomit samples that ambulance man John Saua took from the death scene at the flat determined that Hendrix had a lethal dosage of Vesparax. There was no wine in his vomit. If there was a “wine drowning” as you claim, the vomit would have shown an abnormal amount of alcohol. It did not.
I’ve been asking you since July to show real documented evidence of any wine inside Jimi Hendrix and you have ignored it and refused. All you do is obfuscate, call names, and rehash your same old phony claims.. So, you have shown no evidence except for your own personal opinion and debunked claims.
Albert is making a serious claim. He should immediately undergo a lie detector test to see if he is telling the truth. He should then go to the authorities with his evidence and open an investigation to what he says he witnessed.
I just can’t believe what is being said here by Buster. It is the coroner’s job to establish cause of death in any situation; in Jimi’s case the coroner’s report made it very clear that Jimi died of a lethal dose of Vesparax no where does he mention wine in any of his statements. These alternative scenarios being put forward by the tin foil hatters and the peripheral figures in Jimi’s story bear no resemblance to the actual truth in this matter. Albert was so concerned about Jimi that he failed to notify the appropriate authorities about what he supposedly overheard but instead writes it in a book that no one is likely to read and lets two murderers get away with this heinous crime. Any normal person would have reported this regardless of the consequences despite who the victim is/was. The reason this was not reported at all was because there was no crime to report. Michael Jeffrey was in Spain waiting for Jimi at the Sgt Pepper club in Majorca verified by two people who worked closely with him and Jimi. What is of more concern are the people who Buster willingly agrees with and places his faith and trust in. As far as I know and have read none of them played a central role in Jimi’s rise to fame or his subsequent death and none of them are mentioned in any of the earlier biographies or articles or more importantly in Kathy’s investigation in the 90’s. They only seem to speak up when it suits them mainly to sell a book but fail to speak up when it really matters.
You’re right about that Ivana. If Albert witnessed something this serious as he claims he would have went to the police decades ago to get justice for Jimi. He wouldn’t let murderers roam free and not pay for what they did to the greatest guitarist of all time. What best friend would ever behave like Albert has? Albert has done nothing except to write his claim in a book for money and get publicity on radio shows. Kathy did her investigation in the early 90’s. Where was Albert to convict Monika and get the investigation started? Buster claims the British Government was covering it all up. It was Albert who failed to bring his claims forward that prevented an investigation from happening. Buster quickly backpeddled and made excuses as to why Albert didn’t go to the authorities in the 70’s. So that tells us all we need to know. Another phony claim and Albert will never go to the authorities since it never happened.
Jason is desperately trying to switch the subject here…If Joe Viglione were to go re-listen to those tapes he has of Buzzy recounting his witnessing he would find that Albert told him that story back in the 1970’s…So that means Jason still hasn’t given any accounting for the fact Albert mentioned the famous Samarkand garden photos several decades before they were ever known to the public…Since Monika wrote in her book that she visited Jeffery and Electric Lady in January 1971, and Albert had no way of knowing that either since she did not tell of that visit until she put it in her book in 1995, that too proves Albert’s witnessing is real…Jason still hasn’t made any credible attempt to honestly answer that and he is doing his best to flood the thread with irrelevant BS in order to escape answering the evidence he called for but then ran from when it obviously condemned him…So the point still stands (and Jason is not going to pursue Viglione for any further detail) that Albert mentioned those famous photos several decades before he had any way of knowing about them other than witnessing them in person…That proves Albert’s witnessing is true and Jason is doing his best to dishonestly deny it…So there is no point in taking Jason seriously or answering his trolling posts since he has been proven to be uncredibly pretending to offer serious criticism and has been shown to ignore the good evidence he calls for…
Jason continues to offer regressive, spurious excuses and squirrely attempts to get around the evidence in his replies…He reduces what I wrote to the absurd in order to avoid its credible content that he knows he can’t answer…He loses the “debate” just on that count alone…Jason is lying…I have written clearly in my previous posts that Caesar Glebbeek found the product manufacturer’s information on Vesparax as well as the Underwriter Laboratories case histories for Vesparax overdoses…Glebbeek showed that no one died in less than 4 hours after taking 10 to 15 Vesparax tablets…Jimi only took 9 and had a famous tolerance…The forensic argument that Jason is trying to get around here by means of his lying mis-quotes is that Dr Crompton proved Jimi died no later than 5:30am…Therefore Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 to 2 hours…Since Jimi didn’t have enough barbiturate, nor the required 4 hours to overdose proven in the case histories, that proves he did not overdose…It proves the wine killed him…Anyone can see Jason is lying and taking pains to avoid honestly answering the full argument of what I said…I’ve proven that not only would the “borderline lethal dose”, indicated by the manufacturer, of 9 tablets not kill a person with a tolerance but it would certainly not kill in only 1 to 2 hours…Not only has Jason repeatedly contemptuously ignored this, but he is deliberately misquoting and reducing it to the absurd and grossly oversimplified on purpose in order to avoid this correct forensic argument…It is not “opinion” as Jason lies…It is hard evidence based on the best available science and sources (that he hasn’t answered in public)…
I know Albert Allen and have spoken to him personally…Anyone who meets him or investigates his claim knows he is telling the truth so the very idea that an obvious dark web troll would insult him and his serious witnessing is something that shouldn’t be tolerated amongst serious well-meaning people…Jason is literally the only person who doubts him and I think we can dismiss him and his doubt as a lunatic fringe outlier… Especially when you realize what is involved and its consequences towards Jimi Hendrix…
In regards to Caesar Glebbeek stating that Jimi could not have overdosed on the amount of Vesparax in his system well think again because he did. Jimi took a lethal dose as the recommendation is half a tablet having died from this alone as there was no copious amount of wine in his system or elsewhere. The wine scenario has been invented as the vehicle to make Michael and Monika look like the murderers in this fabricated story. There is no proof or evidence that they were involved in any way; this has come from someone’s overactive imagination. In Caesar’s radio show, Monika states that the Mafia killed Jimi but everything she said has been discredited over the years and I feel this was said to get the heat off Monika over accusations that she was somehow involved in Jimi’s death. In his publication Until We Meet Again, Caesar describes tactics against Monika as a witch-hunt and he clearly supports her something tin foil hatters hate and dislike. I completely agree with Jason that Albert Allan should go to the authorities with his claims and have this matter fully investigated as he needs to be made accountable for what he puts out there. In an earlier post Buster states that he had information that the FBI would be interested in to Bob Levine; he also needs to be made accountable for what he writes, and investigated. What Buster and others are clearly doing is fabricating evidence; they are far from being “well-meaning” as they suggest since they openly set out to defame deceased people knowing full well they cannot be prosecuted for posthumous defamation or challenged by them in any way.
Hi Ivana,
Buster is lying again trying to push his phony murder theory. He still has no evidence of wine and he never will. That’s why he tries to get around it using Albert Allen’s claim. It’s hilarious how Buster uses a phony Vesparax claim when Dr. Teare confirmed barbituates killed Hendrix through real forensics. The Chief in charge of the tin foil hat brigade ignores that and he pushes his garbage conspiracy theories instead. Albert Allen had 49 years to bring his evidence forward to the police. The fact that he never did go tells us he is not credible. Can you imagine sitting on a murder claim of your best friend and not going to the authorities and instead just being content to make money off books while parading around getting publicity laughing on radio talk shows? Then when it’s suggested for Albert to go to the authorities, we get tons of excuses as to why he can’t. Yeah, something for sure is rotten in Denmark.
No matter how hard Jason pulls on the noose it is still obvious that he can’t honestly answer the proof for Albert Allen’s witnessing…If Joe Viglione ever goes to his tapes and listens to his Buzzy Linhart interview he’ll confirm that Albert told him of witnessing the Samarkand garden photos laid out on the table in front of him in the 1970’s…Since Monika did not make those photos public until 1995 in her book that proves Albert’s witnessing was real because Albert had no way of knowing about those famous photos at the time…Jason has made several desperate blowhard responses since I challenged him on this point that all try to switch the subject but the painful truth is he can’t honestly answer this evidence for Albert’s witnessing being true…Speculating that Albert would have gone to the police is not a valid answer to the FACT that Albert told this to Buzzy decades before Monika released that set of photos…Once we have witnessing of Albert speaking of those photos at a time when he had no way of knowing about them other than seeing them in person we are past the point of no return on proof and Jason isn’t afraid to embarrass himself by trying to switch the subject instead of admitting he’s been out-argued…Since Albert has now been validated and Jason has been proven to be an ignorable nay-sayer we can therefore assume that Albert’s description of hearing Monika plotting with Jeffery is also valid and can be used to assume Monika’s role that night…Remember, this still all exists within the reality that credible Hendrix insiders all believe Albert because they know him and know that he would never lie about such an important thing involving Jimi…Literally the only person who frames Albert as a brazen hoaxer out to make money by selling a fabricated account is the dark web creature known as “Jason”…
It is also silly to assert Albert would have gone to the cops…Firstly, the murder was in England not New York, so there was no jurisdiction…Another thing Jason asks us to suspend our disbelief on is his suggestion that there was no COINTELPRO atmosphere in America at the time or that FBI didn’t have a negative file on Jimi…Jason is operating under the laughable assumption that in the case of a political assassination FBI, a clear participant, was going to honestly field complaints and act upon them…A rather absurd notion considering…And what was that complaint going to be?…That Albert saw Jeffery and Dannemann looking at photos together?…Jason also rips all this out of context…At the time even Jimi’s friends considered that maybe he had slipped up and overdosed…So the true context at the time was Albert thought there was something wrong with what he heard but not to the point of acting upon it because it didn’t rise to that point from what he understood…Albert was a coke hustler with Harlem’s main gangster Fat Jack Taylor…Jason ignores that those people just didn’t go to the cops…
I think we can ignore Jason’s trolling denial…
Hey Buster, you gotta love this:
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, says “He still has no evidence of wine and he never will. That’s why he tries to get around it using Albert Allen’s claim”.
We have Dr. Bannister, Dr. Seifert, Dr. Brown, and Dr. Thurston all making reference to wine, as well as Monika spilling her guts to both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence stating that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died.
It’s laughable the way Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, tries to pronounce “no wine” like anybody is going to believe his self-decree over multiple testimonies of people that were there at that time, including the doctors that attended to Jimi.
Sorry, you have only Bannister making a phony wine claim. Siefert said nothing about wine and Brown only said that “Jimi had a ‘bit’ too much to drink” which means nothing. I already posted his quotes from years ago from an article.
As we know, Thurston said nothing about wine since he found no wine in the Hendrix autopsy. The Thurston claim came from a second hand quote from Sharon Lawrence that I’ve already debunked in my “Debunking the phony imbibed wine myth” series.
You sound really angry. You trolls are way too much lol.
You should help Albert go to the authorities to make an official claim. Laughing on radio talk shows making a claim doesn’t cut it.
Hello Ivana,
As I predicted we get more excuses as to why Albert didn’t go to the police. If this “story” was as serious as “Buster” and Albert claims then it would have been dealt with a long time ago. 49 years and counting but Albert stills says he witnessed something serious and won’t have it investigated by the police. All the readers can easily see this “story” doesn’t add up. When Albert says two people harmed his best friend, naturally a good friend does his duty and gets justice for his friend. But not Albert, he is content to make a claim in a book raking in money and laughing on radio talk shows for publicity. So, Albert is showing us with his own actions that his claim is not serious.
Tin foil hatters claim Jimi was “murdered” and they are looking for justice. Well, here is the perfect opportunity to get that justice with Albert’s “serious claim”. But what happens? We get a bunch of lame excuses as to why they won’t get the justice they claim they want. Any reasonable person can see this doesn’t add up. Making serious claims and not following through. Waiting 49 years and still not going to the police to get the case solved. Making money off books while laughing on radio shows getting publicity. That’s what Albert does and he claims he witnessed something “very serious”. That reasonable person has no choice to believe that this is just another hoax like Tappy Wright perpetrated on the public.
Albert Allen should put his money where his mouth is. If he witnessed something as serious as he claims, then he needs to undergo a lie detector test to see if he is indeed telling the truth. Then bring forth all these “tapes” to the police so they can listen to
them. Albert can tell “his story” to real investigators instead of a radio talk show host. Albert can go under oath and describe what he witnessed through the legal system. That’s the only remedy to prove these so called claims where they can finally prove their “murder”. If Albert still refuses, then we know this is just another money making sham intended to further an already debunked conspiracy theory.
Hi Jason. I fully agree that any allegations should be investigated by the proper authorities and not by the court of Buster and Co., Allen should have at least told the Hendrix Family of what he overheard and Kathy during her investigation. This would have been the decent and right thing to do.There have been too many posthumous allegations of murder but these people for whatever reason never come forward when necessary they only speak up when there’s money to be made. I suspect that Allen jumped on the Tappy Wright bandwagon and continued to make these false claims but I have a feeling his claims will be exposed for what they really are. The truth of the matter is that Jimi died of an overdose of barbiturates and not copious amounts of red wine as suggested here; the coroner would have known and seen the difference. If it was murder the body would have shown signs of trauma by the forcing of wine and pills down the throat. I think there should be laws preventing people from making posthumous allegations and defaming the deceased and prosecuted for withholding relevant information.
Buster and Co. is otherwise known as the Kangaroo Court with Buster arguing “his case” at a “courtroom style level” for all the jesters, jokers, tin foil hatters, and hoaxers.
Albert Allen claimed Jimi was a great friend but Albert treated Jimi poorly by withholding important information from the authorities since 1970 and not informing the Hendrix family of what he claims to know. But apparently, Albert had the time to blab his story to “many people” instead. Now he does radio shows and writes books laughing all the way to the bank.
Buster and Albert should put their money with their mouth is and go straight to the authorities with all their “overwhelming evidence” that they claim of a Hendrix murder. They both love to make outlandish claims, so now it’s time to put their claims to the test in the legal system where it can be decided once and for all.
Sitting behind a computer spouting off nonsense for 9 years claiming to be an “authority” like Buster does doesn’t get justice for Jimi. Stonewalling for 49 years like Albert has done is unconscionable. Both of these men “Buster” and Albert need to take their evidence and their tapes to the authorities and put Albert under a lie detector test and set this thing in motion. Talk is cheap. Action Action is needed.
Sure Mr Troll…The same justice system that served Kathy Etchingham when she proved the main witness Monika Dannemann was lying over just about everything that happened that morning and the time of death was off by 6 hours?…Is that the same justice system you are pointing us to?…
You’ve already been given reference to Dr Siefert saying “Jimi was covered in red wine” on video…What are you and your lies going to do when that clip is finally released?…
Buster, you are quite correct.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, says “you have only Bannister making a phony wine claim. Siefert said nothing about wine and Brown only said that “Jimi had a ‘bit’ too much to drink” which means nothing”.
Actually, Browns statement does means something. It corroborates with Bannister’s claim regarding wine, because what else what make Brown think Jimi had “too much to drink”.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, says “As we know, Thurston said nothing about wine since he found no wine in the Hendrix autopsy. The Thurston claim came from a second hand quote from Sharon Lawrence that I’ve already debunked in my “Debunking the phony imbibed wine myth” series.”
No, we know that Thurston did tell about the wine to Jack Meehan on Sept. 29, 1970 and it was relayed to Sharon Lawrence, which is why she published it in her book & confronted Monika over the phone about in shorty before Monika died.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, thinks that his long-winded blather that consists mostly of self-decrees & fabrications that he pulls out of his ass constitutes “debunking”, but it doesn’t — it merely only constitutes self-decrees & fabrications that he pulls out of his ass and NOTHING more.
Sorry wine troll,
Bob Brown said Hendrix died from a drug overdose due to an inhalation of vomit confirmed by Dr. Thurston.
“Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
Sorry wine troll,
Bob Brown said Hendrix died from a drug overdose due to an inhalation of vomit confirmed by Dr. Thurston.”
Dr. Brown never said that. Another self-decreed fabrication Jason pulls out of his ass. Jason is sorry, alright — sorry excuse for it’s mommy not taking her birth-control pills at whatever point in time it was conceived.
Yes asshole, Dr. Bob Brown did say that. But a dumbfuck like you never knew anything about the real Jimi Hendrix case because you only post made up bullshit you read from conspiracy books all over the internet.
“Jimi Hendrix was dead a many good hours before he was brought in to the hospital. Unfortunately, there was nothing I could do for him as he aspirated vomitus from a barbiturate overdose. It wasn’t as if there was something to be done about Hendrix. There simply wasn’t…any medical remedy.” – Dr. Bob Brown
“Hendrix was brought into St Marys hospital in South Kensington. I’d just graduated from Sydney University as a young doctor, I went to London. I was doing locum, and I happened to be in the casuality at St Mary’s Abbott when Jimi Hendrix was brought in. The man had been dead some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
Hi Jason. I would very much like it if this was turned into a legal battle instead of a war of words. Janie Hendrix should seek legal advice over the fact that important and damning information, if true, was kept secret and private until the release of a number of books. Wright and Allen had a duty of care to disclose this information to the authorities and in particular to Kathy Etchingham during her extensive investigation; if they had then the outcome would have been very different. But they both decided to sit on it for decades when the relevant people are all dead, can’t be interviewed or brought to trial. This does not change the fact that Michael Jeffrey was in Spain and that there was no copious amount of red wine at the scene that morning as witnessed by the ambulance officers. The coroner’s report is what really matters in this case; he mentioned nothing about red wine being the cause of death but a lethal dose of barbiturates. Unfortunately this is something tin foil hatters don’t quite seem to understand or grasp. We need to hear those tapes or at least get a transcript verbatim then have them forwarded onto Janie and Kathy. They can then decide how to deal with this further if they wish to do so as only then can the real truth or lies be known. Buster seems to place a lot of trust in people who were remotely connected with Jimi such as Sharon Lawrence, Dr. Bannister, Tappy Wright and now Albert Allen but for some reason prefers to refute the evidence of the coroner, the ambulance officers, most of the doctors at the hospital, the outcome of Kathy’s investigation and the fact that two people stated that Michael Jeffrey was in Spain at the time of Jimi’s death. Buster also needs to be investigated as he is the main person responsible for spreading information via a number of forums regarding Jimi’s death.
I agree Ivana. That really needs to happen. Also, It’s unlawful to withhold evidence that these people claim constitutes a murder.
All along, I’ve been calling the kooks who spread misinformation claiming a Jimi Hendrix murder tin foil hatters since they believe and talk complete nonsense. But the more I think about it, they need a more appropriate name, and that would be hoaxers.
The reason for that, is they have been shown documented evidence all across the board that proves Hendrix died from a barbiturate overdose. They deliberately attempt to manipulate real evidence and instead push their debunked conspiracies. So, they know what they are doing to keep these phony conspiracies alive.
These hoaxers make up their own conspiracies hoping to get gullible people to believe them. Each time they change their conspiracy when it suits their needs hoping people won’t notice.
The hoaxers still want to claim wine when no wine was found. Ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua witnessed no wine on Jimi Hendrix at the flat. They saw him dead first before any doctor did. Also, there were police who witnessed Hendrix dead at the flat and saw no wine either. I debunked these phony wine claims easily in the first 2 parts of my “Ambulance men” series with number 3 on the way.
Also, John Saua the ambulance man scooped up some of Hendrix’s vomit from the flat to be tested and analyzed at the hospital and was given to Dr. Teare for the autopsy. The analysis concluded the vomit contained high levels of Vesparax. There was no indication of any abnormal levels of wine.
So, the forensic analysis proves that there was no Hendrix wine drowning which is why Thurston never wrote it in his report. This also means that Thurston never talked about ‘imbibed wine’ since no wine was seen in the forensic analysis of the vomit.
And since there was no high levels of wine in the vomit that means Hendrix was not ‘covered in wine’. Also, two ambulance men and police men never saw any wine on Hendrix at the flat.
So, these hoaxers lose on both accounts. Forensic analysis refutes their phony conspiracy theories every time.
Ivana,
How did you like the most recent pathetic post from Buster?
I again refuted Buster’s phony wine murder claim with real forensic evidence. What does Buster do? He becomes angry and posts some absurd claim from Ceasar Glebbeek. Buster has run out of gas. Buster uses a man who he truly despises and says is severely discredited as a source out of an act of sheer desperation. Is that all Buster can resort to? That is laugh out loud hilarious!
Jimi Hendrix died from a Vesparax ovserdose. That has been confirmed and documented since 1970. Ambulance man John Saua scooped up a sample of Hendrix’s vomit in a container. He took that vomit to St. Mary Abbots Hospital to be analyzed. That also means Bannister knew about the vomit sample since he was the main attending doctor.
This is actual vomit that came from inside Hendrix. This vomit that was tested would show exactly what Hendrix had in his system. The vomit was also passed on to Dr Teare and Thurston as well. The analyzed vomit was determined to have a high level of Vesparax. There was no high levels of wine that was analyzed. This real forensic analysis ultimately proves that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose. This factual evidence cannot be disputed. Tin foil hatters aka hoaxers cannot try to claim otherwise cuz they will forever be wrong. Real science and forensic analysis trumps phony claims and opinions from hoaxers aka tin foil hat kooks.
Buster read that forensic evidence I wrote in my last post and he probably got really angry. He then pathetically tried to quote Ceasar Glebbeek and some claim from the Vesparax manufacturer that nobody died from 9 Vesparax pills. Then Buster wrote his same b.s. opinion that Jimi had a “famous tolerance to drugs” so he couldn’t have died. Then he claims it was the wine that did it. Sorry Buster the clown, the forensic analysis of Jimi’s vomit showed no abnormal amounts of wine. That proves Jimi was not “drowned in wine”. You can angrily type wearing your tin foil hat until your fingers fall off. That will never change anything no matter what you claim. Science and vomit will always refute you. You will always be wrong.
Ivana, have you noticed how Buster always refuses to believe actual forensic evidence? He pretends it doesn’t exist. Then he looks for some bogus claim trying to prove it wrong. What’s wrong with this guy? A denial can only go so far but Buster takes it to the extreme. Why doesn’t he want to believe real science? Sadly for Buster, he will never be able to refute science with his fake “forensic time line” that he uses. He fails badly on all accounts showing himself to be a buffoonish cartoon clown.
Buster, you can’t argue against a real vomit sample taken from Jimi Hendrix no matter how hard you try. Your phony claims will always fail you.
As for Albert Allen, he should put his money where his mouth is and finally go the authorities and go under oath and testify to a “serious crime” he claims he witnessed. This nonsense of his “serious claims” needs to be put to the test. If he refuses to go, then people have every right to judge and view him as a hoaxer. Making bogus excuses as to why he can’t is for the birds and doesn’t cut it.
The bit about Caesar Glebbeek and the Vesparax had me laughing as well. Jimi could not have had a high tolerance for the pills because they clearly killed him. It wasn’t the fake wine story but the high dosage of the barbiturate pure and simple. The coroner was very specific about cause of death and so were the ambulance officers about what they witnessed that morning. The more sensational a story is the more these hoaxers seem to like it; the truth is just too unexciting for them. Just look at who or what they are attracted to-Tappy Wright and his bogus murder story and Albert Allen with his claim of over hearing Monika and Michael admitting they murdered Jimi at Electric Lady studios. It seems the truth is too boring; Jimi taking the pills offered to him and Michael Jeffrey being on holiday in Spain at the time of Jimi’s death. I wouldn’t take anything these hoaxers say seriously it just sounds really phony. I agree though that they should be made to answer for their claims particularly if they are made decades later as it seems all too easy to invent stories and pull the wool over peoples eyes especially when there is no one around to challenge them. The best thing to do is keep posting Jason hopefully these hoaxers will eventually grow tired of the charade and move on.
Buster provides pure comedy and is desperate for anything to use, even the absurd claims from his new pal Glebbeek. These hoaxers will use any old claim even when it refutes their claim.
Albert Allen should undergo a lie detector test and we will see just how truthful this man really is. “Buster” can argue his “overwhelming evidence” of a Hendrix murder at a “courtroom style level” in front of a judge. Even put Sharon Lawrence under oath to confirm her ‘imbibed wine’ claim from Thurston to Meehan. Oh wait……she already committed perjury once.
Unfortunately, these fraudsters need to keep perpetrating this Hendrix Murder hoax for publicity and to cash in on Jimi’s name. Also, for kooks to spread misinformation pretending to be a “foremost authority” of Hendrix on the internet.
Jason (who really doesn’t deserve the dignity of a response for his obvious trolling) is still desperately trying to get around the evidence he can’t answer about the Samarkand garden photos…The tapes Joe Viglione has will show that Albert told his story to Electric Lady regular Buzzy Linhart back in the 1970’s…There is no denying that Buzzy repeated the detail of Albert saying he witnessed the famous Samarkand garden photos laid out on Jeffery’s desk by Monika…Ever since I posted that evidence anyone can read Jason’s posts and see he is desperately trying to switch the subject and overturn this irrefutable evidence by diverting the subject…But all that shows us is Jason can’t directly or honestly answer the point, which in turn proves why the Samarkand photos are such good evidence…Because no matter how hard Jason trolls, he can’t answer it…What Jason is running from in public is the fact Monika did not make those photos public until 1995 when her book came out…So for Albert to mention those photos in the 1970’s can only mean one thing…That he saw them in person on Jeffery’s desk just like he told…
Jason is a nut because after assuring us Albert Allen is some kind of con man hoaxer he then undermines his own claim by asking Albert to take a lie detector test…If Albert was as untrustworthy as Jason claims then why would he need to take a lie detector test?…All Jason is showing us there is he doesn’t believe his own trolling…No, Albert has already passed that test by speaking of the Samarkand garden photos in the 1970’s…And Jason has failed by not being able to credibly counter it…
Jason also stupidly fumbles my forensic argument…He moronically omits the forensic factors of time and tolerance…I did not say 9 Vesparax never killed anyone…Jason is lying because anyone can read my original statement and see Jason deliberately omits its qualifying information…What I did say was Jimi’s tolerance, and the fact Glebbeek proved persons who took up to 6 more tablets than Jimi died in no less than 4 hours, proves the Vesparax did not kill Jimi as Glebbeek claimed…These two trolls are clueless and their responses show they don’t understand the main arguments…Jason is a liar…The cause of death verdict did not say Jimi overdosed on Vesparax…It clearly said choking on vomit from barbiturate overdose…But semantics are at play here from the authorities because they did not detail that Jimi did not have a lethal dose in him, nor did he have the Vesparax in him long enough – nor would he have overdosed with his tolerance from only 9 tablets…The official sources also failed to accurately reflect that the “vomit” was mostly wine…
Jason is only proving my point for me by using the same method of deception as the original Inquest…Jason also tries to ignore in public that we have a video tape of Dr Siefert saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…That’s not very honest and his trolling hot wind doesn’t relieve him of having to credibly answer for it…
Quite correct, Buster.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, can’t even get the cause of death verdict details correct & he thinks people that are well studied in this case are going to take his blather seriously?? Not a chance.
This is the same guy that’s tried to tell me that I needed to brush up on my Hendrix research. It is, in fact, Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, that needs to brush up on his research, but anyone can easily see from all his blather, that the only “brushing up” that Jason has done, is repeatedly picking self-decrees & fabrications out his ass with his toothbrush.
Hi Jason. Hoaxers exist in a parallel universe along with their parallel forensics and evidence. The real forensics existed back in 1970 conducting by a highly respected and experienced team. They mentioned no wine as the cause of death but a high dosage of barbiturate which caused Jimi to choke of his own vomit. Imagine then citing Caesar Glebbeek as an authority in this matter or Allen with his phony murder claim. How can anyone be sure that the Samarkand garden photos were viewed back in the 70’s and not in Monika’s book published later on like everyone else. We are being asked to accept without question what these hoaxers are insinuating that Jimi was murdered by waterboarding by Michael Jeffrey and Monika but what they fail to disclose is that Michael was in Spain, Monika was alone with Jimi at the Samarkand and the ambulance officers witnessed no wine over Jimi only black and brown vomit. Did the copious amount of red wine suddenly materialise in transit to the hospital and magically gush out of Jimi in front of the doctors? The autopsy revealed the real cause of death and it had nothing to do with red wine if it did the authorities would have been alerted and this would have been treated as a murder investigation and not an accidental death. Hoaxers need to be made accountable for the information they put out there because they change the story from being an accidental death to a murder. By all means if they have “evidence”to the contrary which proves Jimi was murdered then they need to be investigated but I suspect no one will bother because these hoaxers and their claims are never taken seriously and viewed with suspicion and distrust. Imagine believing someone like Buster over the evidence of a respected and highly experienced forensics team. Only a fool would do this.
No doubt they are a bunch of frauds Ivana. That’s why they are only comfortable making claims and not taking any real action like going to the authorities. The real forensic analysis, ambulance and police testimony, news stories from 9/18 & 9/19/70, autopsy records, Kathy’s interview all shows Jimi died from a drug overdose. That evidence and testimony can never be disputed. These fraudulent hoaxers try to suppress real evidence with their own bogus claims and phony stories. They will never have any real evidence no matter how hard they try. That’s why they will always lose.
By Dr. Grant Brenner.”How receptive am I to BS. For people who live in a world of conspiracy theory, there is a great deal of fear and disempowerment, offset by the conviction of knowing the real truth and seeing through the corruption.” Does this sound familiar Jason? Just have a read of what Buster and Co., are writing here. Means absolutely nothing in the face of what was printed and said back in 1970. Buster is your typical tin foil hatter/hoaxer who actually believes Jimi was murdered but look who he has sided with-Wright whose story has been revealed as a complete fabrication, Allen who speaks up decades later after allegedly hearing a conversation by Michael who was in Spain and Monika, Dr. Bannister who saw copious amounts of red wine gushing out of Jimi when there wasn’t any and finally Caesar Glebbeek who is not a forensic scientist but a rock journalist. I forgot to mention Flyswatter who gets abusive when we disagree with his mate Buster. I want to congratulate Buster for putting together such an exceptional team, and doubting the true evidence put forward by the real experts. What these two are doing is questioning the integrity and professionalism of the highly respected and experienced forensic team of the 70’s who attended to Jimi, and defaming the dead who are not here to defend themselves.
Ivana, their agenda is to suppress the real evidence and instead push their lies and bogus conspiracies. I thought at first they were just ignorant of the facts and believed in debunked conspiracies. But when Buster deliberately lies about Jimi’s vomit containing wine when the forensics never detected wine then you know they are pushing a hoax to disseminate the truth. He does this with any documented evidence that debunks his wine hoax. No person can be that ignorant, it is deliberate to spread misinformation and lies about a Hendrix murder that never happened.
Jason keeps pulling things out of thin air…There is no vomit analysis he could cite yet he keeps using that reference to divert attention away from the fact he still hasn’t given an honest answer to Albert mentioning the Samarkand garden photos several decades before they were released to the public…This debate was over when trolling Jason thought he could bluff his way around that…The Samarkand garden photos are proof of the real-ness of Albert Allen’s witnessing for the simple reason that no matter how many times Jason is pressed on it he simply cannot give any credible answer to it…That’s why it is proof and is also why it proves the true relationship between Monika and Michael Jeffery that was overheard in that very real conversation that Jason is obviously in desperate denial of because he knows it is real…
Jason’s whole stance is visibly idiotic because he keeps referencing wine that should have been detected at Jimi’s autopsy (according to him) but wasn’t – even though he has been repeatedly told the wine in Jimi’s stomach and lungs was suctioned out 3 days earlier at hospital and therefore could not be present at the autopsy 3 days later…That shows an irrational resistance to fact that squarely falls in the demented range…It is impossible to detect wine that was removed 3 days earlier…That means the only way Dr Thurston could know about the stomach full of wine is if head registrar Dr Siefert informed him of it…Or perhaps there was enough red wine left in Jimi’s stomach that Dr Teare told him…The only reason Jason is doing this is because he knows he has lost by not being able to counter Albert Allen’s witnessing…
Buster the hoaxer continues his amazing farce with his wine hoax.
Yes, Buster the clown, there was an analysis done on Jimi’s vomit and blankets from the flat. You’ tried to claim that Jimi’s vomit detected “mostly wine” (which it never showed wine) so you are admitting there was analysis done. Another lie and contradiction you’ve been caught in.
Allen has a claim of a “conversation” that he never bothered to report to the police. Looking at pictures means nothing especially since Jeffery was in charge of Jimi’s operations as an Executive.
There was no wine suctioned out of Jimi since the ambulance men and the police saw no evidence of wine anywhere. There is no medical record or public statement that Hendrix had a wine suctioning procedure done. By law, Bannister has to document these procedures in writing on Jimi’s file. Medical procedures cannot be done is secret with no documentation since that is illegal. A doctor dumping out contents from a dead body at a hospital is also illegal, since it has to be analyzed before the autopsy since Hendrix was an official DOA .There is no record of this ever happening, which means it never did. Buster the clown is a hoaxing fraud.
Buster the clown wants to continue with his farce when he has no clue how hospital regulations work and how a doctor by law is required to work. What nonsense are you going to try to claim next? 9 years and counting and still nothing to prove your phony hoax.
Some of us a deliberately re-writing the story here. There was no suctioning done at the hospital this was done at the Samarkand hotel by the ambulance officers as told to Kathy Etchingham during her extensive investigation. Jimi had been dead for hours therefore the doctors would not have tried any resuscitation attempts on him they merely pounded Jimi’s heart for a few minutes in order to establish time of death, in casualty that morning. The coroner witnessed no copious amount of red wine in or around Jimi, only inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. If Jimi was drenched in wine as suggested then this would have been noted in the coroner’s report and cited as a cause of death. If Jimi had ingested any of the supposed copious amount of wine then his blood alcohol level would have been much higher given that he died five hours earlier. As for Albert Allen who fails to notify the authorities after overhearing a conversation between to murderers but discloses this in a book written decades later that no one is likely to read anyway but fails to disclose that one of the “ murderers” wasn’t even in the country at the time of Jimi’s death. I think it’s fair to say that this murder never took place in real life but occurred only in the imaginations of some who have a real problem with differentiating fact from fiction.
Pathetic how these wine hoaxers desperately still try to push their phony wine claims and blatant lies as all the evidence refutes them. There was no wine witnessed at Dannemann’s flat and there is no medical record indicating that Hendrix had wine removed from his body. Any procedure performed by a doctor by law has to be documented on the patient’s medical record. That’s basic standard hospital protocol. This is just another example that debunks their bogus claims. Wine hoaxers don’t like that information being published.
The official hospital statement prepared by Bannister on 9/18/70 never mentioned any wine as the cause of death or any wine removal performed. “The Hendrix Murder Supporters” always attempt to supress this fact from coming out since it destroys their phony hoax.
Dr. Teare found vomit in Hendrix’s lung and no wine was ever mentioned at anytime anywhere by the doctors, Teare, or Thurston in 1970. These hoaxers attempt to recreate the actual events but they will never be able to produce any evidence of wine since there never was any wine. Hilarious how they fail every time and now they try to use Albert Allen as their “evidence” of a “Hendrix murder”. Wonder what new claim they will cook up after this recent one failed.
What I dislike most about these hoaxers and biographers is that they concoct these stories after most of the main players in the Hendrix story are dead. They know full well that they cannot be prosecuted for posthumous defamation and there is no around to challenge their claims. Laughing on a radio show after you’ve made claims of murder says it all really; don’t take this seriously it’s all made up. I’m waiting for these hoaxers to next suggest that Jimi didn’t die but was picked up by aliens and is living on a remote planet somewhere in another galaxy. LOL. Stay tuned for the next instalment.
That will be their next story. LOL
That’s why you can’t take this guy seriously. He says “I have a serious story to tell” but never had it investigated by police and only wrote his ‘serious story’ in a book designed to make money. Laughing on radio shows when he claims it’s serious is a joke and is disparaging to Jimi Hendrix
Hi Ivana,
Can you believe this hoaxer wants to claim that there was no forensic analysis done on Jimi’s vomit or the blankets underneath him that confirms it was an overdose?
Bannister must be the world’s greatest magician. He can make wine appear on Jimi Hendrix in 1992 when it never did in 1970.
Albert only has phony claims and never does prove what he claims. He had many years to provide “evidence” for his claims and he never did. He also had 49 years to go to the authorities to state his evidence to prove a “Hendrix murder” and never did. If what he witnessed was as serious as he claims, then he would have gone to the police right away. Nobody that calls themself a friend would look the other way if what he claims is true. The fact that he never did go, shows it was never serious to begin with and these hoaxers still have no evidence for their bogus conspiracies.
Always a claim and never any evidence or proof with these people. But Albert still has the time to laugh on talk radio shows for publicity.
Hi Jason, Bannister came out with his wine story to counter claims of medical negligence made by Monika in Electric Gypsy in 1992. Prior to that there was no mention of wine only barbiturate intoxication as cause of death. The coroner was very thorough in his examination of Jimi and he would not have reported what he did if there were any doubts about the cause of death. The ambulance officers witnessed exactly what the coroner stated in his report inhalation of vomit, not wine, due to barbiturate intoxication. From what I’ve read here these hoaxers always go with the worst case scenario; there always seems to be some cover up of some sort and that’s why I think they never accept the truth in any situation. These hoaxers have deserted Tappy Wright and jumped onto the Albert Allen bandwagon but both stories are just as phony as the other. Like you said Jason the wine made an appearance in 1992 but was absent in any 1970 report, article or biography.
Ivana,
Not only have they abandoned Tappy Wright’s phony story, these hoaxers make up a brand new scenario that never even happened.
Tappy claimed that Jeffery stuffed pills in Jimi’s mouth and poured wine down his windpipe. Since Tappy’s claim is more phony than a 3 dollar bill, Buster the Hoaxer made up a new scenario that Jimi was incapacitated with pills first and then had wine poured into him. Sorry, but Buster the Hoaxer can’t use his fake claim since the only offical claim is Tappy Wright’s phony story. Then Buster makes up his own phony “forensic timeline” and supresses the real forensic evidence that proves Hendrix choked to death on his own vomit from a barbiturate overdose.
For 9 years Buster the Hoaxer has made his phony claims of a Hendrix murder and he isn’t any closer today to proving his fake case than on the first day he posted. All he has done since then is abandon his original theory by making more outrageous claims that are even more ridiculous.
Now he looks to Albert to prove his fake case since that is a total joke itself. He makes excuses to why Albert couldn’t go to the police. Albert still never proves any evidence after all these years. After you press them on this issue, they say it wasn’t serious to go to the authorities, they were only “looking at pictures”. Jeffery was still in charge of Jimi’s affairs so looking at pictures was part of his job.
Speaking of evidence, Buster never provides any. All this gallons of wine he claims and not one official record shows any documentation of wine. By law, Bannister needed to have documented wine removal on Jimi’s official hospital record. He also would have needed to preserve all the wine he removed and documented that as evidence by law. The hoaxers try to supress that fact with fake quotes and claims.
Two ambulance men, police officers, and a coroner’s officer were at Dannemann’s flat and not any of those professionals witnessed any wine. For the amount of wine these hoaxers claim was there, that bed would have been flooded with alcohol. Nobody there saw any wine at all. Nobody saw any wine on Jimi’s body. The room would have smelled from wine. Was this magic wine that appears only when the hoaxers want it to?
Also, how many bottles of wine are we talking about with these hoaxers? Buster the clown claimed Hendrix had “5 bottles of wine” poured down his throat spilling out of his mouth to full capacity. How could that be when both ambulance men witnessed only dry vomit down Jimi’s throat when they used an aspirator on him? Did the magic wine appear later at the hospital for these frauds?
Bannister claimed Hendrix had a half bottle of wine in his hair. How does one determine that? Did Bannister wring out Jimi’s hair to measure a half a bottle of wine? Bannister claimed Hendrix was soaked in wine and hoaxers claim the bed was flooded with wine. So if Hendrix had 5 bottles of wine inside him to full capacity, half a bottle in his hair, and a soaked body and bed, are we talking about a case of wine here? Who carried the case of wine? One of Jeffery’s MI5 or MI6 agents, one of the mobsters in the mafia or black panthers, Jeffery himself? Or did they all carry one bottle each to avoid any arguments? Who had the honor of opening and pouring the first bottle? Jeffery? Oh wait…Jeffery was in Spain, so he had to arrange this whole “wine drowning” on short notice over the phone hoping his troops got it right as he shouted orders through the phone at the command post at the phone booth across the street.
Bannister said Hendrix was dead for several hours before he arrived at the hospital. He then claimed Hendrix was soaked and covered in wine, but also claimed Jimi was naked. How could Jimi be soaked in wine when Bannister claimed Jimi was naked? The wine would already have dried on Jimi’s skin since Jimi was already dead for several hours. Bannister is a lying fraud and makes claims he forgets about each time he decides to speak. This is the guy that hoaxers use as their chief witness. Ex Doctor Bannister, Tappy Wright, Sharon Lawrence, Albert, and these hoaxers are just made for each other.
Buster tied himself to Tappy Wright’s phony claim but now has abandoned it. Buster still has never called himself or Tappy Wright a liar for supporting a blatant lie. That’s why Buster changed Tappy’s phony theory to his new “incapacitation theory”. Buster the clown can’t use his new theory since that refutes the only claim on record which is Tappy Wright’s scam. New fake claims are not allowed. He is forever stuck with the garbage Tappy Wright wrote.
Now Buster wants to claim there was no forensic analysis done on Jimi’s vomit or the blankets after he previously lied claiming the vomit showed “mostly wine”. Buster is a hoaxing troll who suppresses real evidence for his alternate fairy tales.
Here is some published material worth reading for everybody viewing this page.
“Inside The Legacy Of Jimi Hendrix”
By Joe Viglione and Buzzy Linhart
“I picked up the telephone on the receptionist’s desk and it was Dolly Dagger (Devon Wilson) telling me I had to believe her. What she told me was that Jimi had called her the day or so before and told her that he had been up for days. He had talked to his doctor in New York City and the doctor said “You’ve got to get some sleep” – the doctor said “Do you want me to call in some sleeping pills for you to a doctor I know in London?” Jimi said” No, that’s OK, there’s Tuinols in the medicine cabinet in the bathroom here.” They agreed that Jimi- having a great tolerance to this type of drug -would need to take 3 capsules. But this turned out to be the German Tuinols which were the EQUIVALENT of three a piece, so they turned out to have the potency of 9 capsules.”
So, Joe and Buzzy published an account of Jimi taking a drug overdose of Tuinols which led to Jimi’s death. Joe and Buzzy are crediting the official account of Jimi’s death in their book. Obviously, they both thought this account was credible to publish.
This makes Albert’s account meaningless since Joe and Buzzy can’t have two different conflicting accounts cuz then they both would not be credible either way. If Albert’s account was credible, in any way, shape, or form, he would have brought his claim out decades ago, and not wait to publish it in a book for money decades later.
Notice this little passage from the book.
“They agreed that Jimi having a great tolerance to this type of drug.”
This is the defense that Buster the hoaxer uses for the “reason” that Jimi “couldn’t die from a drug overdose”. Sorry, but anytime you take way more than the prescribed amount plus pills that are more powerful you are asking for trouble. Not to mention, Jimi had a powerful amphetamine before he ingested 9 Vesparax pills.
Hi Jason. Interesting post. There is no question Jimi died of inhalation of vomit brought on by the high dosage of barbiturates coupled with whatever he took at Kameron’s party and the wine he drank either at the Samarkand or earlier on at the two parties he attended. Joe and Buzzy’s account sounds more credible when placed against the nonsense Allen claims. Noel Redding thinks that Jimi’s death could have been prevented if only he got help sooner meaning that the delay in calling the ambulance may have contributed in some way. Like Tappy Wright’s book, Albert Allen’s will suffer the same fate ending up in the $2 bargain basement bin if it isn’t there already.
Hi Ivana,
Can you imagine Fraud Bannister frantically suctioning wine out of Jimi Hendrix when Bannister already stated Jimi was dead on arrival, dead for hours, cold and blue with no life to him?
No wonder this guy was convicted for fraud as a doctor in 1992 making phony claims like this.
It appears the hoaxers are confused whether they want to claim Hendrix was dead or still alive when he was brought to the hospital.
The hoaxers have dropped Tappy Wright’s phony claim since we both confirmed Jeffery was in Spain. Now they go with Albert’s claim that has failed them as well. What’s the next claim for the hoaxers?
Buddy Miles, the late drummer from the Band of Gypsys, falsely accused Michael Jeffery of cheating him out of money. Miles was the person who claimed Jeffery was stealing money from Hendrix. Jeffery proved him wrong, but conspiracy theorists still try to use that debunked claim today.
Buster the wine Hoaxer, still desperately looking for any quote so he can prove his phony wine theory. This is hilarious. He still doesn’t understand that quotes are not real evidence when there is no written hospital documentation of any wine inside or on Jimi Hendrix.
BUSTER says: October 6, 2019
“You’ve already been given reference to Dr Siefert saying “Jimi was covered in red wine” on video…What are you and your lies going to do when that clip is finally released?…”
And you’ve already been shown testimony from two ambulance men who said nothing about any wine on Jimi Hendrix. Both of these men examined Hendrix first before any doctor did. You were also shown the official St. Mary Abbots Hospital statement on Hendrix’s death and no wine was mentioned or in any news report. There is nothing in the medical record or autopsy record stating wine.
Nothing, since the testimony from both ambulance men refute any other claims. You can’t have no wine at the flat and have wine instantly appear at the hospital.
This debate was already won by me when “Jason” refused to give an honest answer to the fact Albert Allen mentioned the full set of Samarkand garden photos back in the 1970’s when he first told of his experience to Buzzy Linhart…Jason dishonestly refuses to acknowledge that Albert could not have mentioned those photos, that were not released until 1995 when Monika’s book came out, in the 1970’s unless he had seen them…That proves that Albert’s witnessing was real despite the childish lies of Jason who refuses to admit the undeniable…We can then accept that Albert Allen witnessed Monika’s true relationship with Michael Jeffery and the fact she was working with him…In her book Monika described a fearful relationship with Jeffery where she tried to stay away from him, but what Albert witnessed was the truth and we can therefore realize that held true for when Jimi was with her at the Samarkand and that she was working for Jeffery…Therefore it becomes academic that Monika’s being the vehicle for the barbiturate was part of her cooperation with Jeffery…Anyone can see the evidence for this in Monika’s anxiousness to get Jimi back to the Samarkand at both Harvey’s and Kameron’s…Jason uses idiotic rationale to get around this and deny it, so we can dismiss him from being taken seriously…
The next piece of evidence Jason is in contempt of is the Samarkand garden photo where Jimi has Monika’s large scarf around his neck…In his 1990 letter to Glebbeek Dr Bannister wrote that Jimi had a wine-soaked towel or jumper around his neck at hospital…That is smoking gun proof that Jimi was the person that Dr Bannister removed the wine from because Dr Bannister, like Albert Allen, mentioned something that he had no way of knowing about unless he saw it in person in that scarf…In his letter to Glebbeek where he described the wine that was drowning Jimi Dr Bannister detailed that article of clothing that was around Jimi’s neck and soaked in wine…We then go to Monika’s Samarkand garden photos and we see that very article of clothing tied around Jimi’s neck…Bingo…Jimi wore Monika’s scarf that is seen in that photo all afternoon and evening…He never took it off and was murdered while wearing it…So for Dr Bannister to mention it in his original communications is proof that he treated Jimi and suctioned 5 bottles of wine from his lungs and stomach because he simply had no way to know about that scarf unless he had seen it on the person he treated that morning…
There is a liar named Purple Jim (Britisher Jim Hawthorn) who showed one of Monika’s Samarkand photos of Jimi with that scarf around his neck that came from a music score publication in 1971…The liar Hawthorn is trying to say that Bannister peeked at that photo and decided to concoct a hoax about Jimi being drowned in wine…Purple Jim is actually contending that Dr Bannister looked at that photo from the music score sheet and thought to himself that he could then use it to claim Jimi was drowned in wine…Not only do those who know Bannister know he had no interest or access to obscure musical score sheets on Hendrix, but that photo in that score sheet showed Jimi in the afternoon…If Hawthorn’s contention were true and Bannister used it to concoct a hoax then how would he know that Jimi didn’t take that scarf off and give it to someone who could refute the claim it was around Jimi’s neck at hospital?…How would he know that it couldn’t be proven to not be on Jimi 18 hours later and therefore expose his lie?…Purple Jim insults our intelligence…It is obviously much more sensible to simply see Monika’s Samarkand garden photos as the simple confirmation they are that the scarf Bannister witnessed around Jimi’s neck at hospital was the same scarf seen in Monika’s photos and that it is proof Bannister treated Jimi and removed 5 bottles of wine from him…Purple Jim is just a not too bright liar and shouldn’t be taken seriously…Monika’s scarf around Jimi’s neck in Monika’s Samarkand photos from the 17th is proof…That’s all there is to it…There’s the confirmation of a wine-soaked towel or jumper and therefore confirmation of Bannister’s credibility…It is also confirmation of Dr Siefert’s claim that Jimi “was covered in red wine”…
What this moron never did tell you is that a couple of the Samarkand photos were published in 70’s magazines so they weren’t unknown photos in 1995. These photos were seen before for decades.
Also, Jimi took a bath and changed clothes before he went to Kameron’s party so he wasn’t wearing the same outfit in the Samarkand photos.
So, this raving lunatic has been debunked again.
Plus Jimi was already dead and there would be no point in suctioning imaginary wine from a dead man.
Jimi’s barbiturate lethal level registered at .7 there would be no possible way to get that reading if Hendrix was drowned in wine because he would have been dead before an overdose could occur.
Also, Jimi had a stomach full of rice. If his stomach was full of wine and was suctioned out there would be no rice found in the autopsy.
Finally, Dr. Teare found vomit in Jimi’s throat. If he was “drowned in wine” as you claim no vomit would have still been there.
So, as always, you will forever be full of shit perpetrating a hoax.
Hi Jason, I just can’t believe the rubbish I read above. Our “friend” has decided to drag someone else into his debate Purple Jim from Crosstown Torrents. Buster was banned from this thread because of his outrageous accusations and I’m assuming he has an immense dislike for the people who post on there because of that reason. Notice how Buster uses a pseudonym on this thread but has taken it upon himself to reveal the identity of Purple Jim. We have stated many times that Michael Jeffrey was in Spain at the time of Jimi’s death actually waiting for Jimi to fly over there and meet up in Majorca confirmed by the inner circle of Trixie Sullivan and Jim Marron. These two would have absolutely no reason to cover up a murder. Of all the people who attended to Jimi’s body that morning in 1970 from the Hendrix personnel, the ambulance officers, policemen,doctors,coroner and finally Gerry Stickells who identified the body none of them remember or witnessed copious amounts of red wine on Jimi. I am assuming the body was not washed or tampered with before it reached the coroner. There was no suctioning done in casualty that morning this was performed by the ambulance officers at the Samarkand as protocol dictates. So where exactly did Bannister’s five bottles of wine come from? Jimi’s death was not considered a murder but an accidental death of inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. That is what the coroner witnessed and found. If there was wine anywhere on Jimi then this would have been noted as a cause of death along side the barbiturate overdose and reported on the death certificate. Dr. Seifert also said that he saw Jimi before he died and after; this of course contradicts everything else because Jimi died hours earlier at the Samarkand hotel covered in black and brown vomit and was found fully clothed on top of the bed he was not wearing just the scarf as Bannister suggested. Monika and Terry Slater watched Jimi being placed into the ambulance from across the street. Monika then accused the ambulance officers of placing Jimi on a chair with his head back insinuating that Jimi was alive at the time and shifting blame onto others. As for the garden shots of Jimi wearing the scarf these can be readily seen by anyone in Monika’s book published in the 90’s.
Hello Ivana,
Buster the wine hoaxer is very desperate using insignificant claims for his “evidence”. I find it really amusing but more hilarious as you look at the big picture. Buster the wine hoaxer has run out of gas and has nothing left in the tank. He is reduced to posting absurd nonsense claiming he has won a “debate”. Buster now thinks a claim of a “scarf” proves his already debunked theory. He also thinks he has “proof” with Albert’s claim. He has been debunked with everything else, pictures and a scarf is all the has left. Notice how he uses the “pictures” for both claims as his “evidence”. It really is hilarious.
Buster has no evidence of wine and he never will. Also, by law Bannister was required to document a “wine removal” on Jimi’s medical file and there never was anything documented. Buster suppresses this fact with his phony claims. It’s best to let “Buster” spout off his phony claims since he has no real evidence. Nobody takes him seriously anyway.
“Buster” provides more fiction with his fake made up “murder story”. Nobody takes him seriously. Now he’s trying to claim two people looking at pictures and a scarf solves his fake murder caper.
“Buster” wants us to believe that Michael Jeffery and Monika Dannemann were up to no good looking at pictures as Buster spins another phony story.
Bannister was aware of Jimi Hendrix during the 21 years before he made his phony wine claims in 1992. Bannister listened to Jimi’s music and Jimi was pictured on books and magazines for the 21 years before Bannister spoke of wine. Jimi was famous for wearing a jumper and flamboyant clothes so this means nothing.
There was no “5 bottles of wine” or any “wine removal”. There was no wine witnessed at Dannemann’s flat by ambulance men or the police. Buster always avoids this fact.
Buster has nothing except for his fantasy scenarios and still has no evidence. Picture viewing and a scarf does not document any proof of wine that wine hoaxers need for their evidence that they never can provide.
There is a British liar named Jim Hawthorn who has written a “Death Of Jimi Hendrix” website that tries to disprove the murder theories…If you read the site its content is idiotic and evasive similar to Jason’s offerings…Hawthorn goes by the handle “Purple Jim”…Hawthorn relies on Caesar Glebbeek’s ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication where Glebbeek also tries to disprove the murder theories…In ‘Until We Meet Again’ Glebbeek claims Dr Siefert was questioned about the wine and responded “I detected no alcohol on Jimi’…Hendrix documentary-maker David Kramer saw that quote and responded that he video interviewed Dr Siefert in the 1990’s and Siefert told him on tape “Jimi was covered in red wine”…So what we have here is firm documentation that Siefert lied and changed his story 180 degrees…Dr Bannister, on the other hand, told a story that never varied over the decades he told it…But let’s look at Glebbeek and his quote a little closer…Glebbeek is a notorious spin doctor who has obviously distorted the information in his disinformation work ‘Until We Meet Again’…Glebbeek did not footnote or reference that quote from Siefert and it is possible he fabricated it…At the end of his ‘Until We Meet Again’ work Glebbeek pronounced that it finally proved Jimi wasn’t murdered and that he was going to drop the subject and not answer any questions thereafter…Any person with an IQ above room temperature would see Caesar made that disclaimer because he knew his ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication was fraught with lies and distortions – and , yes, purely fabricated quotes that he didn’t want to account for…Caesar is a bit of a bombastic ass who is used to getting away with such arrogance because he knows he has a group of dependable sycophants that will let him get away with it if he doles out Hendrix goodies like music and memorabilia as a reward…Yes people, these rats Caesar and Crosstown slit Jimi’s throat and betray him and then reward people with Jimi’s own treasure if they keep their mouths shut and let them get away with it…Those who stand up to this wicked treachery are then organized against and banned…So it is highly possible Siefert never said that and Glebbeek invented it…One thing that is for sure, Glebbeek never showed proof for it or footnoted it…So it is possible that Siefert never said “I detected no alcohol on Jimi” and that it is just a straight lie from Glebbeek whose egotistical arrogance shows no bounds…With this in mind, if Caesar is lying, that means the only proven documented quote from Siefert says “Jimi was covered in red wine”, which then becomes verification and corroboration of Dr Bannister…And if the “I detected no alcohol on Jimi” quotes turns to be real than at best all we have is proof of Siefert lying…
I recently had a debate with Hawthorn on the Jimi Hendrix Experience Facebook page…Hawthorn is trying to deny all the other evidence that more than proves murder by quoting Dr Bannister when he said Jimi was a tall man whose legs stuck off the end of the emergency room table by 10 inches…Hawthorn thinks that this tells you Bannister remembered another patient who had a scarf around his neck, showed signs of being dead a long time, and had 5 bottles of wine in his lungs and stomach – and that other patient wasn’t Jimi…What rubbish…Purple Jim, like Jason, is just straight pulling that out of his ass and using it as the desperate excuse it is…Anyone with common sense will realize there was a big sensation that day after they failed to save Jimi so Dr Bannister remembers who he treated because the man he failed to save was then followed by a big public reaction…Purple Jim demands strict evidence but he can’t produce a speck of evidence for his imaginary other tall black man that he’s desperately trying to pawn Bannister’s memory off on…Bannister was only an intern for a year before going back to Australia so if we could access his hospital record we would see that there was no other imaginary tall black man who was drowned in wine – I mean how stupid does Purple Jim think people are?…
So if we go back to the real record Hawthorn and Jason are in denial of we will see the ambulance men mentioned “pools” of vomit that connotes liquid…Dr Brown said in a statement I read that “Jimi had a misadventure involving wine and that he was obviously beyond medical remedy”…Siefert is on video saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…And Bannister detailed the real truth when he said he removed at least 5 bottles of wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach (proof for which is shown in the half hour treatment time in the hospital report)…The Chief Coroner Gavin Thurston then put the truth seal on it by telling reporter Jack Meehan “From his stomach contents at his autopsy Mr Hendrix had obviously imbibed a large amount of red wine”…There’s your money quote from the person of number 1 credibility…Monika Dannemann also exhibited a highly revealing stressful reaction to the wine when Sharon Lawrence confronted her with it shortly before Monika’s death (a death that was directly related to knowledge of the wine finally becoming public)…Monika then lied and made up a quick excuse to get around the wine that she moaned in reaction to when asked about it…People don’t end up dying from non-existent wine…Glebbeek, Jason, and Hawthorn are all in desperate denial of this reality and are therefore trying to force obvious bastardizations and lies to get around it but any honest person of average intelligence can see we have reasonably proven the wine to the lying doubters…It is obvious that their demented denial is in reaction to something they know is real and can’t admit…
In my debate with Hawthorn, in reaction to Siefert’s quote about the wine, he admitted that Siefert mentioned the wine but then made up the excuse that Siefert was talking about wine he smelled from the vomit that was covering Jimi…Well there’s several problems with that…First of all Hawthorn never honestly answered to the fact that would therefore directly conflict with the alleged claim that Siefert “detected no alcohol on Jimi”…Siefert smelling and seeing the wine in the vomit would therefore be strong detection of the wine and not the claimed “I detected no alcohol on Jimi”…As usual the less than honest Hawthorn offered no explanation for this…Also Jason is saying there was no wine detected at the Samarkand – but if Siefert detected wine at the hospital then it would most certainly be similarly detected at its point of origin at the Samarkand where it would be more detectable…Again – no answer from the liars on this even though their math clearly doesn’t add up evidence-wise…Lastly, for there to be noticeable wine in the vomit at the hospital would mean it had to have an accompanying blood alcohol content if it was drank innocently…But we don’t see that in the firm science…We see only a trace blood alcohol content at autopsy…Hawthorn’s reaction to this was to quit and run from the debate and delete the thread…He then got his insider moderators to ban me from the group with a false complaint…His last word was to go to Velvet Rocket and see the good job Jason and Ivana were doing (insert loud laugh here)…
These lying losers can’t outlast a debate with me without cowardly deletion and banning (which amounts to flagrant censorship)…The reason they do that is because they know they can’t answer the evidence I just posted…They stay away from my forensic arguments like Kryptonite because they know once they are forced to obey them that their lies will crumble like the unfirm matter they are…
There’s a clearly visible white feather in England’s bonnet…
That’s right Buster. These liars overlook the fact that Monika told both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died.
As for the ambulance men, they never stated anywhere, at anytime, that they didn’t see wine. The claim of “the ambulance didn’t see any wine” is just a fabrication that these liars are pulling out of their ass.
As for Dr. Brown, I already referenced two articles where Brown made the statement of “too much to drink” regarding what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at the hospital. If there was no wine, as these liars claim, then what would make Bob Brown think Jimi had “too much to drink”? In fact, if there was no wine, as these liars claim, then what would make Bob Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink, at all? Good luck to the liars answering that one.
So while the liars are wrapping us up and declaring their victory any honest person of average intelligence can see they left serious evidence that proves our case unanswered…Anyone can see Jason never made any honest effort to answer the FACT Albert Allen proved his witnessing was real by mentioning the famous Samarkand garden photos taken by Monika that last afternoon of Jimi’s life…Purple Jim Hawthorn tried to get around it by showing a single picture from that set that was released in an obscure sheet music publication in 1971…Hawthorn actually tried to get away with saying that Dr Bannister saw that photo in that obscure Hendrix sheet music publication and then used it to claim insider knowledge about the scarf around Jimi’s neck that proved his witnessing of the wine was real (yeah, sure)…Anyway, I have proven Albert Allen’s witnessing was real because Albert mentioned the full set of photos laying on Jeffery’s table in his original accounts back in the 1970’s…Even if a single image was released in a sheet music publication nobody saw, there was no way for Albert to know a whole set existed like he described…Knowledge of that whole set in the 1970’s, when Albert had no way to know that there was a whole set, is proof that can’t be gotten around…Jason knows this, which is why he’s refusing to answer it…And once you prove Albert’s witnessing was real, like I have done here, you can then assume his witnessing of Monika and Michael plotting together was real and therefore showed a covert relationship between the two that put an accurate context to morning of the 18th…I just realized another thing that proves Albert is telling the truth…He told me that he heard Monika saying to Michael that Jimi’s noticeably haggard condition in those photos could be used to say he was damaging himself with drugs and that it could be used to show he had killed himself that night through drug abuse…I have seen those photos and you can see Jimi looks really bad like I have never seen before…He has a really worn out look on his face that looks like he’s been through it…He looks noticeably bad like he’s been beaten up…Again, this shows knowledge of something Albert could not have known about at the time unless he heard it in person…
You haven’t referenced any articles. I posted the article from The Courier which Brown stated “Jimi had a ‘bit too much to drink”.
A ‘bit’ is not 5 gallons of wine like you liars are trying to say.
The ambulance men saw no wine at the flat and neither did the police. They were all interviewed and not one man made any reference to wine which would be obvious.
No wine at the flat means no wine on Hendrix.
Good luck with that!
Check this out, Buster….
We have Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, trying to say “You haven’t referenced any articles” regarding Bob Brown, when in fact there were two articles referenced by myself in an earlier post of mine, on August 14th, (try looking up) which would be this one here:
https://www.couriermail.com.au/entertainment/music/about-that-jimi-hendrix-death-business/news-story/ce5ff67c5e0c9a0857b51eb33d88357b?sv=55d2698fd5dee338cff30dfcede38062
And this one here:
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/music/about-that-jimi-hendrix-death-business/news-story/ce5ff67c5e0c9a0857b51eb33d88357b
Another clear-cut example of Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder just wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
Hey Buster, look at Jason’s statement of “A ‘bit’ is not 5 gallons of wine like you liars are trying to say”.
Who said anything about “5 gallons”, other than Jason? What was said was “5 bottles”, which would most likely equate to maybe 1 gallon, at the most. Jason can’t even get his details correct.
It’s laughable, the way that Jason has to rip things out of context & pull fabrications out of his ass to support his phony narrative.
Hey Buster, now we have Jason trying to say that I never posted any links to articles regarding Bob Brown referencing Jimi having “too much to drink”, but anybody who scrolls up to the posts that were made in mid-August will find that on August 14th, I did, in fact, post two links to those articles.
Nice work by Jason, at exposing himself as the lover & maker of lies, that he clearly is.
One more thing, which is laughable…..
These liars that are claiming “no wine”, are suggesting that their self-decrees & fabrications (with no substance or references to back up their claims) that they pull out of their asses, automatically overturns multiple corroborating testimonies by the multiple people that were there at the time Jimi Hendrix died. Totally LUDICROUS !!
I’ve interviewed Dr Bannister directly and asked him about the bogus points Jason and Hawthorn are raising…The truth is Dr Bannister was a doctor whose head was in professional things and wasn’t any rock n roll fan or person who interacted with any Hendrix literature or publications…Because Jimi was so famous Siefert and Bannister did what any professionals would do in such a situation and didn’t volunteer anything…When they were first approached around the time of Kathy Etchingham’s investigation they showed what I am saying is true by saying nothing could be done for Jimi…This was all part of that defensive professional stance…The same was true for Bannister so he went back to Australia and did his medical practice…No one came to him to ask anything and he didn’t go out of his way to talk about what he thought was an unfortunate tragic accident…It wasn’t until someone came to him and said you’d better look at ‘Electric Gypsy’ and see what they are saying about you that he got involved…He went and got a copy and in it he read Monika accusing him of malpractice for not doing a tracheostomy…This drove Bannister to write a letter to Glebbeek informing him that a tracheostomy would do no good because Jimi was drowned in an unusually large volume of wine like he had never seen before and the wine was so voluminous that it reached all the way up to Jimi’s throat…Just like Monika’s accusations had blown-back on her when she accused Noel (which caused Kathy to get in the game) her tendency to place blame on others really blew back on her this time with Bannister’s reaction…In that letter Bannister described treating Jimi and said he had a wine-soaked towel or jumper around his neck…That article of clothing was verified when Monika released her Samarkand garden photos with Jimi wearing her large scarf around his neck…That oversized scarf was obviously the “towel or jumper” Bannister mistook the scarf for…Bannister had not seen any of the Samarkand garden photos before he wrote that letter to Glebbeek so his mention of that object around Jimi’s neck was directly from his memory…The simple explanation is the correct one in this instance and Bannister had confirmed his witnessing when he mentioned Monika’s scarf Jimi was photographed wearing that day…And he mentioned that it was soaked in wine…
Check this out, Buster….
We have Jason, in his desperation denial, trying to say “You haven’t referenced any articles” regarding Bob Brown, when in fact there were two articles referenced by myself in an earlier post of mine, on August 14th, (try looking up) which would be this one here:
https://www.couriermail.com.au/entertainment/music/about-that-jimi-hendrix-death-business/news-story/ce5ff67c5e0c9a0857b51eb33d88357b?sv=55d2698fd5dee338cff30dfcede38062
And this one here:
https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/music/about-that-jimi-hendrix-death-business/news-story/ce5ff67c5e0c9a0857b51eb33d88357b
Another clear-cut example of Jason’s desperation denial. He can’t even get his facts straight.
More delusion coming from this wine Hoaxer who still uses the same phony claims to prove his fake murder caper.
Bannister has changed his stories each time he has spoken. Bannister prepared the official hospital statement on Jimi’s death was reported to the media. The statement said it was an overdose of drugs. They said nothing about wine. Buster has no answer for this.
The rest is made up nonsense with zero evidence. There is nothing on any Hendrix medical record stating massive wine. The autopsy clearly showed no evidence of a drowning or wine in the lungs. The hoaxers will forever lose on forensic evidence.
The desperation is hilarious!
Exactly Jason. The ambulance officers stated that they received many calls to overdoses in those days back in the seventies so they were very familiar with what the scene would look like. Jimi was covered in vomit consistent with an overdose. No where did they mention wine this would have been more consistent with an alcoholic binge. If there was that amount of red wine covering Jimi then the police officers who saw Jimi’s body that morning would have raised the alarm. But both the ambulance crew and the police officers were confident in their assessment that this was an overdose. No where
during Kathy’s investigation did anyone present that morning remember seeing large amounts of red wine covering Jimi what they do recall is the black and brown vomit on Jimi and the surrounding bedding. It’s obvious the wine story/myth was added much later.
That’s a lie and this clown can’t show any example of Bannister changing his story…Jason is resorting to rather demented, childish denial at this point…I trust any intelligent person can see the difference between our offerings…This crude, trollish level of input Jason is offering is obviously being used to evade the intelligently rendered evidence Flyswatter and myself are offering…And I think it would be Dr Siefert’s job as head registrar to prepare the hospital report if I’m not mistaken…
Anyone can see Jason has embarrassingly dodged answering the substance of what we’ve written with his self-exposing trolling replies…Every single thing Flyswatter and myself write is backed by hard evidence from the record…
What we are seeing in Jason is an unfiltered troll who is resorting to idiotic name-calling instead of answering evidence he knows he can’t honestly answer…
Jason is an idiot…It would be against the law for the hospital to prepare any report on the cause because that is legally left to the Inquest…The was no autopsy done at the time of the hospital report and I think Jason has confirmed himself to be sloppily credulous and not to be taken seriously at this point…Jason is a liar who stupidly shoots himself in the foot and shows to the public he is just pulling things out of his ass and making it up as he goes along in his demented denial…It is disqualifyingly stupid to say Bannister made a report that the law prevented him from making that was obviously the job of Dr Teare and the autopsy…Dr Teare had no way of knowing about the wine because it was removed and disposed of 3 days earlier at the hospital…But we do have evidence that the Inquest knew of the wine in Dr Thurston’s statement that Jimi’s stomach was full of red wine…Jason will say we don’t have proof of that but he is just an idiotic liar who shouldn’t be given the dignity of a response (as his posts show)…It is more than clear the story here is one of the information of the wine not making it to the autopsy or cause of death at the Inquest like was legally required…
Red wine would be obvious to anyone who was the flat if there was gallons of wine there . Neither Reginal Jones or John Saua said anything about red wine at the flat. Not one police officer said anything about wine. Neither did the coroner’s officer. John Saua said it “looked like a drug overdose” in his testimony. He didn’t say anything about a wine drowning. He also scooped up a vomit sample to be analyzed which proved it was a drug overdose. I’ve already covered this, but the wine hoaxers supress real evidence and push their bogus conspiracy crap that fails every time. They cannot argue against real forensics or have magic wine appear at the hospital when no wine was ever witnessed at the flat when these men witnessed Hendrix first before any doctor did.
Buster the clown the wine hoaxing troll, is really going to enjoy my Bannister series that will further destroy his hoax. Bannister lied and changed his story many times Mr. Wine Hoaxer. Also, the third part of my current series will destroy more of your phony claims. Also, I have more series that will destroy all your phony claims. Your phony stories will a be exposed as a fraud just your old ones have. You are making this way too easy Mr Wine Hoaxer. Enjoy!
.
Here is a preview of Bannister who lied and changed his story. Mr Wine Hoaxer has nothing to say about this. You are a lying clown Mr Wine Hoaxer cuz Bannister changed his story. Now how do you answer that?
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”- Ex Doctor Bannister
Fraud Bannister told us right here that Jimi Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival. The attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality he said. That means the attempt lasted a few minutes, if that, which corroborates what Dr. Siefert said. What Bannister just stated, means there was no 20 -30 minute resuscitation attempt like he claimed 21 years later. A dead person who is a formality doesn’t get worked on for a half hour. Bannister said nothing about wine either. His phony wine claims came in 1992.
So, Fraud Bannister made it perfectly clear right here that Jimi Hendrix was a DOA and nothing more was done for him. 21 years later Bannister changed his story and lied about 20-30 minute resuscitation attempt and wine removal. A severe contradiction to what this fraud claimed in 1992 when he made up fake stories. The original evidence cannot be changed no matter how hard these wine hoaxers try.
Buster the wine hoaxing clown has no answer for this and tries to supress this evidence with his fake wine hoaxing claims. When I have real evidence I will always defeat Buster the wine hoaxing clown troll who has nothing but phony claims with no evidence. Everybody reading this site can see this is the case.
Wine hoaxers have no official evidence of wine they can produce. It’s always a claim post 1992 when Bannister first talked about wine.
If Jimi Hendrix really died from a wine drowning as these hoaxers claim, then why did Bannister write the official cause of Jimi’s death as a drug overdose on 9/18/70? Why didn’t Bannister declare it as a wine drowning in 1970 as he claimed in 1992?
Also, if there was all this massive wine, then why didn’t the ambulance men mention the word wine in their testimony? The only state dry vomit.
Why didn’t one police man mention the word Wine?
Why didn’t the coroner’s officer mention wine when he was at the flat to collect the remaining pills as evidence?
And for the Grand Finale, if Jimi Hendrix died of a massive wine drowning, then why did Jimi’s vomit sample and the blankets that went for forensic analysis only show barbiturates and the amphetamine he took earlier?
If there was this huge “wine drowning”, the blankets and the vomit would have shown wine. The blankets and vomit only showed barbiturates and no wine.
You can’t argue against forensic analysis. Hoaxers always lose on real evidence. Claims and decades later quotes can’t refute real forensic analysis that showed no wine.
Wine hoaxers have no answer for any of this or for real forensic evidence that proves there was no wine.
The autopsy report would have mentioned wine in conjunction with the barbiturates overdose if both caused Jimi’s death. As you said Jason the autopsy revealed inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication nothing more. The coroner would have been very thorough and precise in his investigation and in his subsequent report. If he had suspected foul play he would have raised the alarm back then and notified the authorities and had this matter investigated further.
This lying joker Jason is taunting us by saying WE are not answering HIS forensic analysis..Except he hasn’t shown any forensic analysis…When I asked him to answer my barbiturate forensics he was moronically silent…When I asked him to please produce the report on the vomit analysis again he responded with nothing…
Jason is a moron who shows he has no grasp of the material…The emergency room doctors are not allowed to determine any official cause of death by law…That is up to the autopsy and Inquest…
Bannister did not talk about the wine in public until 1990 when he wrote his letter to Shapiro & Glebbeek in January of that year simply because no one asked him before that…I asked Dr Bannister and he said they simply saw it as unusual but owed to reckless use of alcohol and drugs…At the time they did not have enough information to suspect it was murder (and black people were traditionally given the fast treatment – I added that not Bannister)…And if this is what it looks like, that wine evidence was deliberately suppressed…
Jason is repeating the same questions that have been answered several times already…I don’t think Jason has even read the ambulance report…If he had he would know that the ambulance men detailed to Kathy that they tried to penetrate the hardened plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat with their ambulance equipment but it was too flimsy to get through the vomit so they packed Jimi up in order to get him to better equipment at hospital…It has been explained to Jason repeatedly that the ambulance men described the exterior wine as “vomit” because people don’t use the word “wine” to describe vomited wine…The use the word “vomit” and that is what the ambulance men said…Jason has also had it told to him numerous times that the ambulance men said there were “pools” of vomit at the scene…”Pools” connotes liquid, so it is therefore not true that the ambulance men did not mention wine at the Samarkand…Jason already knows that the ambulance men never uncorked that hard plug of vomit to get to the wine in Jimi’s lungs and stomach but he keeps asking the same dishonest question over and over in his denial trolling…
The question about the Coroner’s Office not asking about the wine at the flat is a good one…The answer is that Jimi was a political assassination done by one of Britain’s own MI-6 agents and it was deliberately covered-up as it happened as the question Jason asks, but then doesn’t honestly seek the answer to, shows…Jason hasn’t studied any of this…If he had he would already know the police collected the pills and pill box at the Samarkand…
Jason is pulling things out of his ass and cannot show us any report or analysis of the blankets and sheets…This is all part of Jason’s attempt to lie and make excuses around the 5 bottles of wine Dr Bannister witnessed and spoke of – and removed from Jimi – that morning…Which is just a straight truthful account of what happened, as all the other evidence Jason is ignoring in contempt shows…It is stupid to say the barbiturate and amphetamine autopsy analysis came from the blankets and vomit samples when any fool knows they came from the blood analysis…Just another doozy from Jason’s well exercised rectum…
Hey Buster, you notice how Jason keeps referencing the quote of ““On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”- Ex Doctor Bannister” — but doesn’t provide the full quote with that sentence that Bannister wrote in letter to Shapiro — providing another example of Jason’s desperation denial buffoonery.
Here is the actual full quote, which can be found in Tony brown’s book “Hendrix — The Final Days” and elsewhere:
“Some of the statements [about Hendrix’s death] were incorrect. At the time of his death, I was the Surgical Registrar on duty at St. Mary Abbots Hospital. I was called to casualty with one or two other Medical Officers. The ambulance had brought in a patient who was unconscious. He was taken out of the ambulance and wheeled into casualty. We attempted resuscitation and cardiac massage. Continual suction on his pharynx and larynx was performed. “On his admission, he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heart beat and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality, an attempt we would perform on any patient in such condition. His mucous membranes in the larynx and pharynx were completely cyanosed and prior to suction there was red wine and gastric contents exuding from his mouth. The very striking memory of this event in my mind was the considerable amount of alcohol in his pharynx and larynx, despite suction,and it was obvious that he had drowned in his own gastric contents.
“At the time I was not aware who Jimi Hendrix was, but it was pointed out to me soon after. “I recall vividly the very large amounts of red wine that oozed from his stomach and his lungs, and in my opinion there was no question that Jimi Hendrix had drowned, if not at home then certainly on the way to the hospital. At the time I felt he had either been on sedative tablets, to sleep or otherwise, and that he had imbibed copious amounts of red wine prior to going to sleep. I would suspect that he regurgitated the red wine and drowned.
“I note in your book that someone suggested he should have perhaps had a tracheotomy. He would not have responded to such treatment and it was not even a possibility. I would suspect that he had been dead for quite some time before he reached the hospital and there was no indication to proceed to tracheotomy. “I do not believe that he was admitted into hospital and that he was taken to the morgue directly from Casualty. “I can recollect my own feeling at the time … that it was a tragic loss of a young person to the effects of alcohol. The scene remains extremely vivid in my memory, and I can quite clearly recall the large amounts of red wine causing his hair and clothes to be matted”
Oh, and one more thing, Buster.
How would any of the attending doctors (Bannister and Seifert) know on that day of Sept. 18, 1970, that three (3) days later when the autopsy was done, that a Blood Alcohol Content of .005% was going to be revealed, indicating that something wasn’t right??
Dr. Bannister apparently didn’t find out about this low BAC until way later on according to this:
“Dr. Bannister was also interviewed for the BBC Radio One’s Wink Of An Eye, broadcast on September 10, 1995. “He did not have an obstruction of the airways,” Dr Bannister told the interviewer. “What he had, was that he had a drowning of the airways. His lungs were completely overcome by fluid. One does a tracheotomy to get better access to the trachea and to the airways. But his problems were below that. The body was cold, there were no signs of circulation and my overall impression was that he’d been dead for some hours before.” It is curious that despite the copious amounts of red wine that Jimi had in his body, his blood alcohol level was low. It is also curious that Jimi was covered in so much red wine. Dr. Bannister’s statement that the red wine was matted in his clothes and hair might imply that it had been poured over him and left to dry. He could have been soaked in wine for hours. “
Buster the wine hoaxer pathetically tries to claim a “pool” means wine. That’s how desperate this fraud is. Guess this idiot never heard the term “a pool of dried blood”. So, a pool does not have to be liquid.
The vomit was dry, and Saua stated that, so this wine Hoaxer loses again.
Buster makes up the usual bullshit of a “hardened plug of vomit” that was never mentioned by either Reginal Jones or John Saua. This is a total lie. Where do these men state “a hard plug” of vomit?
No evidence of Jeffery in MI6 either. More crap to supress the real evidence.
Buster the wine Hoaxer makes up bullshit to supress the real evidence. The funny thing is he has no evidence to back up his bullshit claims.
There was no wine at the flat and no ambulance man ever said the word wine in their testimony. Everything would have been soaked and the ambulance men would have said so.
No wine at the flat means no wine on Hendrix.
There was analysis done on the vomit and blankets. That is standard procedure.
Buster the wine Hoaxer’s phony theory is going up in flames.
I’m glad that the wine hoaxing sidekick “Flyswatter” posted that entire quote which further cements the case against Fraud Bannister and how he changes his stories.
Hendrix was already dead when he was brought to the hospital. Both Ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua stated that. So did the police. Jimi was not “unconscious” when he was brought in like Bannister now tried to claim. JimI was dead on arrival.
Bannister stating it was a formality is all the proof we need that shows no 20-30 minute resuscitation attempt or wine removal was ever done. Plus there is no documentation of a wine removal.
Thank you for continuing to destroy your wine hoax. This is hilarious!
Here we go again Buster, with Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, ripping things out of context with his statement of ” Jimi was not “unconscious” when he was brought in like Bannister now tried to claim.”
Bannister was not “now” trying to claim anything. Bannister was simply referencing that Jimi wasn’t conscious upon when Bannister first sighted him being brought into Casualty and then Bannister goes on to say “On his admission (AFTER close examination), he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heart beat and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality, an attempt we would perform on any patient in such condition”.
And here’s another self-decree & fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass:
“Bannister stating it was a formality is all the proof we need that shows no 20-30 minute resuscitation attempt or wine removal was ever done. Plus there is no documentation of a wine removal.”
Quite the contrary. The coroner’s form did say “Unable to Resuscitate” and it’s known that Jimi was admitted at 11:45AM and was declared dead at 12:15PM. If there was no removal of wine, as Jason self-decrees, then Jimi would have been declared dead way before 12:15PM This time frame of 11:45AM to 12:15PM was printed in Mitch Mitchells book in 1990, which was most likely obtained from the hospital report.
So, Jason’s self-decree doesn’t prove anything other than he can only pull self-decrees and fabrications out of his ass to support his phony narratives.
You gotta love this one Buster, this is really laughable;
Jason says “Buster the wine hoaxer pathetically tries to claim a “pool” means wine. That’s how desperate this fraud is. Guess this idiot never heard the term “a pool of dried blood”. So, a pool does not have to be liquid.”
Does Jason understand just how stupid he makes himself look with that one? Last time anybody checked, a pool of anything — be it water, blood, wine, beer, oil, gasoline, etc — starts out in liquid form, as it physically impossible for any ‘pooling’ to occur without liquid substance. An example –> a block of wood cannot “pool” because it has no liquid for to begin with
The profuse amounts of vomit that the ambulance men witnessed is very much the symptom of a drowning victim. It is common for drowning victims vomit profusely & violently — just like Jimi did from being drowned to death in red wine.
It is well known that John Bonham and Bon Scott died from vomit asphyxiation after heavy drinking binges, but no such reports were ever made of profuse amounts of vomit, nor any autopsy report stating that there was any collapsing of either men’s lungs.
Jimi’s autopsy did state that there was collapsing in his left lung, so Jason’s claim of “The autopsy clearly showed no evidence of a drowning or wine in the lungs” is just another self-decreed fabrication that Jason is pulling out of his ass in his desperate denial of reality. If there was no drowning or continual suctioning of fluid from the airways (like Bannister stated was done for 20 minutes), then there wouldn’t be any collapsing of either Jimi’s lungs found at the autopsy.
The sidekick wine Hoaxer “Flyswatter” still can’t provide any evidence of wine at the flat and can only invent fake stories instead.
Teare found no evidence of Hendrix being drowned which would show if he was. Hendrix didn’t have collapsed lungs. He had a partially collapsed left lung.
Hilarious how a moron like this thinks he knows more than Teare.
And again, Buster,
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, has already been told that Monika told both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died, plus it has already been pointed out that at no time, did the ambulance men ever state that they didn’t see any wine.
Jason also never answered the question of what would make Bob Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink, if there was no wine. Brown obviously saw the wine, so that means the ambulance men saw it, too. As did Seifert and Bannister. And Thurston told Jack Meehan about it, one day after the Inquest.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, has not provided one shred of proof that there wasn’t any wine — just self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass with no reference sources or documentation to back it up.
We have multiple corroborating testimonies of men that were there at the time plus what Monika told both Brown and Lawrence, and yet Jason thinks his self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass automatically overturns those testimonies.
Check it out Buster…
Again we have Jason taking what was said and ripping it out of context.
Jason says “Teare found no evidence of Hendrix being drowned which would show if he was. Hendrix didn’t have collapsed lungs. He had a partially collapsed left lung.”
My post never said Jimi had “collapsed lungs” — my exact words were “Jimi’s autopsy did state that there was collapsing in his left lung”.
Teare also did also state there was free fluid found in one of the lungs. Where did that come from if Jimi wasn’t drowned?
Hilarious how Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, has to go and rip things out of context & deliberately produce lying misquotes when he can’t answer directly the germane points that are made.
Yeah, Jason obviously isn’t too bright if he makes a statement like that in public and doesn’t realize how stupid it makes him look or how uncredible towards the evidence he is…But hey, if you’re doing sloppy denial of everything that is written you don’t really have to pay attention to what you write…Kathy got a statement from the ambulance men that they witnessed large “pools” of vomit on and around Jimi…As any intelligent person whose sole purpose isn’t crude denial trolling knows “pools” connotes liquid and cannot be interpreted any other way…As Flyswatter notes, anything that is described as “pools” has to start as liquid whether it dried up or not…So Jason has been thoroughly refuted over his claim that there was no evidence of the wine at the Samarkand…All Jason and dishonest deniers like Jim Hawthorn are doing are using semantics to dishonestly deny the evidence…The truth is there was evidence of the wine at the Samarkand and there it is in the form of the ambulance attendants referring to large “pools” of vomit, which has to be a description of the wine percentage of that vomit…Jason’s response is moronic in relation to this and fails to answer the proven evidence…Jim Hawthorn references Jason and this thread as being a good example of ME being refuted…But I don’t see that coward Hawthorn showing up here to own up to idiotic gaffes like this committed by our buffoonish adversary when he makes a fool out of himself…
The simple truth is the ambulance attendants got the best witnessing of the external wine when they arrived but described it as “vomit” because, no matter what the percentage of wine, when stomach contents are thrown up they are described as “vomit” as a general term…Like Flyswatter wisely instructed, if Dr Brown said Jimi had too much to drink then he had to detect something to make him say that…That something was obviously the wine because we know it wasn’t gin cocktails, so there’s your corroborating proof for the wine…So, as Flyswatter advises, if the wine was detectable enough that Dr Brown noted it then it had to be even more detectable at its place of origin at the Samarkand…This is common sense stuff that only a truly demented dedicated troll would avoid admitting at this point…Jason has been told this repeatedly yet he has yet to give any answer to it…
As far as the plug of vomit, Jason is playing word games again…Any reading of the official statements gotten from the ambulance attendants would show that they clearly described not being able to penetrate hard dry vomit in Jimi’s throat with their inadequate equipment…They said that they decided to rush Jimi to hospital in order to access better suctioning equipment…My statement is accurate and is backed by the facts…None of that idiotic word parsing Jason offers shows otherwise…If you read Jason’s replies he is offering a load of bullshit that is designed to avoid answering the good arguments that he is using that bullshit to avoid…My description of the hardened plug of vomit was correct…Hence it is correct and accurate to say the ambulance men never witnessed the wine flooding Jimi’s lungs and stomach because they never accessed it…
BUSTER says: October 11, 2019 “Jason is an idiot…It would be against the law for the hospital to prepare any report on the cause because that is legally left to the Inquest…The was no autopsy done at the time of the hospital report and I think Jason has confirmed himself to be sloppily credulous and not to be taken seriously at this point…Jason is a liar who stupidly shoots himself in the foot and shows to the public he is just pulling things out of his ass and making it up as he goes along in his demented denial…It is disqualifyingly stupid to say Bannister made a report that the law prevented him from making that was obviously the job of Dr Teare and the autopsy…Dr Teare had no way of knowing about the wine because it was removed and disposed of 3 days earlier at the hospital…But we do have evidence that the Inquest knew of the wine in Dr Thurston’s statement that Jimi’s stomach was full of red wine…Jason will say we don’t have proof of that but he is just an idiotic liar who shouldn’t be given the dignity of a response (as his posts show)…It is more than clear the story here is one of the information of the wine not making it to the autopsy or cause of death at the Inquest like was legally required.”
Buster is a total ass clown and shows it with this absurd and ludicrous comment. A hospital always reports what they perform on a patient since they are legally bound to do so. The hospital reports what happened to Hendrix and they pass that information on to the inquest.
I guess Buster the ass clown expects the inquest to guess what happened with no information available on Hendrix?
There is no law preventing Bannister from documenting procedures done on patients. The law requires Bannister to document everything he performed on Hendrix since there was not an inquest when he was first brought in.
The fact that Bannister has no documentation of a 20 minute resuscitation attempt or wine removal proves that this is a fraudulent lie. The inquest would have had this information if it actually happened. No such information was ever given to the inquest. Bannister is a liar.
Buster the ass clown expects us to believe with his dememted thinking that hospitals perform operations on patients in “secret” and never document what they do. So, everybody having a operation never has it documented on their personal medical file according to this wine hoaxer troll. All the people reading this are laughing their heads off just like I am.
Bannister was legally bound to document wine and pass that information on to Dr Teare. Bannister was also legally bound to preserve the wine and have it analyzed to determine the cause of Hendrix’s death.
Buster the ass clown thinks Bannister can remove wine from Hendrix’s body and dump it out with nobody knowing. Does anybody with an ounce of common sense believe this crap? That is illegal and cannot be done tampering with and not disclosing medical evidence on a dead patient. This totally destroys this Buster’s claim since no information of this procedure was ever documented.
Buster the ass clown claims Dr. Teare had no knowledge of wine but the inquest did. A bogus contradiction. The inquest would have no knowledge of wine since Bannister never documented any wine on Hendrix’s official record. There was never any massive wine mentioned at the inquest.
Thurston never documented any wine in his final report. Teare found vomit in Hendrix’s lung as well as fluid. If Bannister suctioned out wine like he claimed in 1992, then there would be no vomit or fluid left behind for Teare to discover. This fact alone proves there was never any wine removal. Hendrix couldn’t have been completely suctioned out with vomit and fluid still remaining in his lungs. That is medically impossible. Buster the ass clown has no answer for this either. He better make up a phony claim where he says “But Bannister told me this”.
Also, if there was a massive wine drowning, the analysis performed by Teare would have shown wine. Buster the ass clown doesn’t understand real forensics. When the inside of a body is drowned in wine as he claims, the evidence never goes away, the forensic analysis would still discover it.
People can easily see the difference from my postings compared to an ass clown flailing away making up total crap in desperation. Buster the wine Hoaxer wants you to live in an alternate reality where facts, documented evidence, and regulations are not the norm. Buster wants you to believe instead where phony claims, no documentation, and no hospital regulations exists in a fantasy world of make believe.
Buster the ass clown has no answers for real evidence, real forensics, doctor requirements, and real hospital regulations. Instead he attempts to supress this with his own bogus made up stories that makes him look like a real friggin idiot and he desperately continues this fraudulent wine hoax on the public but he fails each and every time. People can see he has zero credibility and is a complete and total iiar.
Jimi had all the signs of someone who had been dead for a while before the ambulance was called this is what lead to Kathy’s investigation and it was established that Jimi had died five hours earlier. They felt that this delay in getting help to Jimi contributed to his death. The ambulance officers attended to Jimi that morning using suctioning equipment as is required of them; there was no resuscitation attempt done at the hospital. The doctors on duty pounded Jimi’s heart as a mere formality only to establish time of death as Jimi was, to them, beyond help. No doctor would be foolish enough to attempt a resuscitation on someone who had clearly been dead for a while; the doctors would through experience been able to identify this. Resuscitation is attempted only in circumstances where death is immediate and only for a short while. Dr. Bannister is suggesting that Jimi was unconscious when brought in to the hospital that morning and this warranted the 20 minute resuscitation attempt; the police would not have been called to the Samarkand that morning if Jimi was alive only the ambulance officers would have been there. All the people around at that time working on Jimi’s case would have clearly identified the wine in conjunction with the barbiturates as cause of death. However the wine was never mentioned as the cause of death only inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. Jimi’s death certificate clearly states this for all to see and read. Some of us are making up alternative scenarios that border on fantasy and that have nothing whatsoever to do with the real circumstances surrounding Jimi’s death. Suggesting that Jimi was waterboarded to death with wine and sleeping pills is irresponsible and ludicrous at best as none of the evidence points to that. Michael Jeffrey was in Spain at the time of Jimi’s death pure and simple so he could not have been responsible.
Hi Ivana,
Did you read how desperate and pathetic Buster the wine hoaxer is? He’s trying to claim vomit means the “exterior of wine” and the ambulance men said it was really wine they saw. All the people reading this are having a good laugh. I mean how desperate can one be? Buster the wine hoaxer needs to wave the white flag. He knows he lost his phony wine claim and looks like a desperate clown. His goofy sidekick parroting his garbage looks like more of an idiot.
They have nothing. No evidence of wine or any documentation. That’s why they use phony claims and now make up total nonsense for why there was no wine ever witnessed at the Hendrix death scene. Maybe in 9 more years Buster the wine Hoaxer can finally think up a believable claim for his non existent wine that he claims? Wine hoaxers will always be exposed for not having real evidence. No wine was ever witnessed at the Hendrix death scene. That means there was never any wine.
BUSTER says: Bannister did not talk about the wine in public until 1990 when he wrote his letter to Shapiro & Glebbeek in January of that year simply because no one asked him before that…I asked Dr Bannister and he said they simply saw it as unusual but owed to reckless use of alcohol and drugs…At the time they did not have enough information to suspect it was murder (and black people were traditionally given the fast treatment – I added that not Bannister)…And if this is what it looks like, that wine evidence was deliberately suppressed.
JASON says: Bannister did not talk about the wine until 1992 cuz there was no wine in 1970. He used wine to cover himself cuz he was afraid of another malpractice suit since he was being investigated for fraud. He got the wine idea after reading Electric Gypsy.
BUSTER says: Jason is repeating the same questions that have been answered several times already…I don’t think Jason has even read the ambulance report…If he had he would know that the ambulance men detailed to Kathy that they tried to penetrate the hardened plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat with their ambulance equipment but it was too flimsy to get through the vomit so they packed Jimi up in order to get him to better equipment at hospital.
JASON says: More crap being shoveled by a troll wine hoaxer. There is no testimony on record from John Saua or Reginal Jones stating there was “a hard plug of vomit” that they needed to get Jimi to the hospital to remove. Hendrix was already dead so there was no need to remove anything. Reginal Jones and John Saua never said anything about “hard plugs of vomit”. You continue to post crap and make up stuff since the real evidence is always against you.
BUSTER says: It has been explained to Jason repeatedly that the ambulance men described the exterior wine as “vomit” because people don’t use the word “wine” to describe vomited wine…The use the word “vomit” and that is what the ambulance men said…Jason has also had it told to him numerous times that the ambulance men said there were “pools” of vomit at the scene…
JASON says: More horseshit coming from a wine hoaxer. Man, you sure are desperate coming up with this crap. This is hilarious. Dry vomit is what John Saua stated and nobody said a word about wine. If there was a “wine drowning” as you claim red wine would have been soaked all over. Not one man said wine cuz there wasn’t any.
BUSTER says: ”Pools” connotes liquid, so it is therefore not true that the ambulance men did not mention wine at the Samarkand.
JASON says: Desperation at it’s finest. John Saua and Reginal Jones never said anything about red wine at the flat. John Saua mentioned it was an overdose. He said nothing about wine. You are pathetic.
BUSTER says: Jason already knows that the ambulance men never uncorked that hard plug of vomit to get to the wine in Jimi’s lungs and stomach but he keeps asking the same dishonest question over and over in his denial trolling.
JASON says: There was never any “hard cork of vomit” you made it up cuz you have nothing. Nice contradiction by the way. If Hendrix was filled to capacity with wine as you claim, no hard cork of vomit could form. So, we know there was no wine or hard cork of vomit. Your conspiracy theories contradict each other.
BUSTER says: The question about the Coroner’s Office not asking about the wine at the flat is a good one…The answer is that Jimi was a political assassination done by one of Britain’s own MI-6 agents and it was deliberately covered-up as it happened as the question Jason asks, but then doesn’t honestly seek the answer to, shows…Jason hasn’t studied any of this.
JASON says: Buster the clown made this up for his fake “evidence” since he has none. You sure look like an idiot writing this nonsense.
BUSTER says: If he had he would already know the police collected the pills and pill box at the Samarkand.
BUSTER says: The coroner’s officer took the pills.
Roberta Flack and Donny Hathaway had a hit song in 1972 called “Where is The Love”? For our wine hoaxers, their song should be “Where is The Wine”?
Where is the wine?
So, we have a “wine drowning” claim by wine hoaxers where no wine was ever found. Hard to have a “wine drowning” when no wine ever existed. But these frauds use all kinds of lame excuses so they can still claim wine. Yes, it is pathetic, but we all sit back and laugh.
Where is the wine?
You can’t claim a “wine drowning” when no wine existed on Hendrix or around him at the flat. Would magic wine appear later for Bannister? I guess the wine hoaxers believe Bannister is a magician who can make wine appear 21 years later.
Where is the wine?
Wine hoaxers can use whatever ridiculous means they want in order to prove their bogus claim. The simple fact remains that no professional at the flat ever testified to witnessing wine. Not one ambulance or police man ever mentioned the word wine. They all said vomit. There was no wine.
Where is the wine?
Also, the wine hoaxers have no documented evidence of wine. If there was a “wine drowning”, we would have documented evidence and an official statement of wine. Nope. Nada one. No documented evidence wine hoaxers can find to prove their phony wine claim.
Where is the wine?
And we have Bannister’s own admission that any attempt to resuscitate Hendrix was merely a formality. Which means there was no 20-30 minute resuscitation attempt done since it was only a formality. A formality does not have any procedures done. Down in flames goes the claim of wine.
Where is the Wine?
Fraud Bannister was convicted for fraudulent conduct in 1992 as a doctor and was struck off the medical register just after he made his phony wine claims. Who would believe a fraudulent liar who was convicted for fraud? Fraud Bannister makes claims of wine he never ever documented or stated on 9/18/70. We all can see this is another case of fraud.
Where is the Wine?
Hendrix’s vomit sample showed no wine and neither did forensic analysis of the blankets. Buster the clown lied trying to claim that the vomit showed “mostly wine”. That is a lie and Buster the clown with his comment admitted that there was vomit analysis completed which is standard procedure in a drug overdose death.
Where is the Wine?
Remember kids, you can’t have no wine at the death scene and then claim wine later on after the fact. It doesn’t work that way. Unfortunately, that’s what the wine hoaxers want you to believe, but they will always forever be wrong, since they will never have any evidence of wine cuz no wine ever existed.
Where is the wine?
No wine ever existed. So there never can be any wine. Wine hoaxers lose since there was no wine ever at the death scene. No witness ever stated there was wine at the Hendrix death scene. No wine at the death scene means no “wine drowning”.
Where is the wine?
Well done, Jason. I’ve just finished reading an article by Harry Shapiro one of the authors of Electric Gypsy where he mentions that the toxicology report showed that Jimi had a low alcohol level in his blood equivalent to five glasses of wine like I wrote below. Monika states that Jimi had not been drinking excessively that night from what she observed despite her other inconsistent statements. The doctors and ambulance officers both said that Jimi was a mess but Dr. Bannister takes this further stating that the wine was oozing from his larynx and stomach in casualty again going against what Dr Seifert admitted to seeing and doing and what the ambulance officers observed at the Samarkand that morning. Jimi’s death was not alcohol but drug related. There is no evidence to suggest that Jimi was waterboarded to death with wine as claimed by Tappy Wright or that Michael Jeffrey or Monika were in some way involved with Jimi’s demise. These scenarios were concocted in the minds of tin foil hatters but easily dismissed as Wright admitted he made the whole thing up and Michael Jeffrey was in Spain confirmed by two employees. The wine was first mentioned by Monika in Electric Gypsy in the 90’s but in none of her statements in 1970. What these hoaxers are trying to do is to present their thoughts, opinions, judgements and speculations as evidence and fact which of course it is neither of the two.
Any intelligent person who reads Jason’s replies will see that he’s a clueless troll who is just making up his responses as he goes along…If you look at his earlier posts he was just learning of all this for the first time and going out and studying the references we were citing in order to put a gratuitous negative spin on them as if he was a well studied expert even though it was obvious that he had just seen that reference for the first time when we led him to it…
As usual Jason enters a lot of hot wind but he doesn’t answer what was said…Jason is trying to say if the wine existed it would have been entered by Bannister in the hospital report…First of all Dr Bannister was a fresh recruit and intern who was serving under Dr Siefert who was in charge as the Chief Registrar…I have seen the Hospital Report and it was most likely written by Siefert who would have had responsibility over Bannister who was an underling…Jason keeps referring to a hospital report that was written by Bannister but, like most of what he posts, he is just pulling that out of his ass and has no evidence what so ever that Bannister wrote any report…It could have even been the head nurse who wrote the report…
What Jason is trolling around and avoiding making clear is that the autopsy determines most of what needs to be determined as far as cause of death…But even the autopsy is subservient to the Inquest…The autopsy is just a straight sterile pathological detection process that then turns its information over to the Inquest to determine cause of death…Bannister had zero to do with this even though Jason tries to make him the sole reporter…What is unknown is who reported the details of Jimi’s treatment and condition to the autopsist Dr Teare…We know someone told Dr Thurston that Jimi’s stomach was full of red wine…We don’t know if that was Siefert or if it was Teare who may have witnessed residual wine that remained…If it was Siefert then we have evidence that the information about the wine was relayed to the autopsy by the emergency room doctor…If this is true then we have evidence of malpractice in the autopsy and Inquest because that was critical forensic information that needed to be involved at those events…In any case as the senior overseeing head registrar I would assume Dr Siefert would be responsible for the relay of that information and since we have evidence of Dr Siefert being compromised by corruption that would explain a lot…
In any case I know Dr Bannister and I’m sure a quick phone call would confirm that he had nothing to do with the hospital report that this dark web nut Jason assures us was totally under his control…He never mentioned writing it to me in any of our talks…The handwriting on the report could be traced and I’m sure it would prove to be that of Dr Siefert or a head nurse…
Jason is once again lying when he says there is no record of a 20 minute wine removal on the report…I suppose we’re going to have to locate that report…It would be easily located except most Hendrix fans assholes at the research level have now made themselves hostile to the subject and work against the cause…I’m sure Glebbeek could produce it but he won’t because he’s not going to help expose his lies…Anyway, as is typical of Jason, he has already been repeatedly told that the report shows an admission time of 11:45 and quitting time of 12:15…That recorded time period perfectly reflects the 20 minutes Dr Bannister told me it took them to clear the wine in order to attempt resuscitation…Plus the 10 minutes it took them to realize Jimi was dead and would not respond…Jason has been told this repeatedly yet he ignores it and enters the same lie over and over…
Yes, Jason is quite correct that disposing of the wine was against medical law…When I described that disposal of the wine to Harvard pathologist Dr David Benjamin he got so angry that he started talking to me in Latin…I asked him what he said and he told me I just cited the medical law they violated by doing that…He told me there was nothing anyone could do however because medicine is nationalized in Britain and you can’t sue them…If there was no information on this it wasn’t because Scotland Yard went out of its way to find out…When Kathy Etchingham petitioned them to reopen the case they avoided talking to the nurses and never even interviewed Bannister…Jason, the horse’s ass, is OK with this gross malfeasance and intentional avoidance of witnesses by Scotland Yard…Any honest person can see Scotland Yard was avoiding talking to people who could prove what they already knew about the wine…
Jason is full of shit and his ruminations are less than useless…It is clear to any honest, intelligent person whose main intent isn’t trolling the subject that the information about the wine was suppressed and was deliberately kept off the record from emergency room to autopsy…We have evidence of this in the fact Dr Teare violated medical law by going the opposite way on the trace blood alcohol content and raising it by estimating what the blood alcohol content was at time of ingestion of the Vesparax…Dr Teare entered on the autopsy that he was ESTIMATING a blood alcohol content of 100mg at time of ingestion of the pills…He was trying to work up an alcohol level that would spur the drug conflict that resulted in the choking on vomit…But what Dr Teare should have done is just read the unaccountably low blood alcohol content straight for what it was and then follow-through by further investigating and trying to explain why it was that low and what it told him…That was his duty and he failed to do it…When he did that he violated his sworn duty and expected practices, and I personally don’t think it was by accident…Things are different over there in England and the government can legally order such a corruption of the process and can do it secretly…Jason is an irritating parrot who when you mention violating medical law cuckoo birds it back to you only in a twisted way that ignores the real offense and turns the violation backwards…
We’ve proven the wine because the autopsy doctor of top credibility described Jimi having a belly full…If Jason denies this then he’s just a straight liar…
I think Jason might be one of the nuts who regularly attacks me on Kennedy Assassination websites who followed me over here…
Good point, Buster.
If there was “no wine”, as these liars keep decreeing, then why would Teare even bother with making an ESTIMATION of a blood alcohol content of 100mg at time of ingestion of the pills, TO BEGIN WITH ??? What exactly would prompt Teare to make that estimation, in the first place? The point is, if there was no wine, as these liars claim, then there is NO estimation of a blood alcohol content of 100mg at time of ingestion of the pills, made by Teare in his autopsy report. Why did Teare feel the need to make that estimation?
That question needs to be answered along with what would make Bob Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink when Brown first sighted Jimi at the arrival to St. Mary Abbots??
The liars can’t answer these questions, so we will see more of their same regurgitated evasive blather.
Yes Flyswatter, the evidence is visible if you just apply common sense…Dr Teare would not enter in the legally-accountable official autopsy that Jimi had a blood alcohol content of 100mg when he took the pills unless he was prepared to defend it…Dr Teare was a senior pathologist and was considered to be the best in England at the time…He knew better than to enter something that he could be taken to task over…It is obvious he was prepared to use the belly full of red wine Dr Thurston had referred to as his evidence…As Chief Coroner, Thurston had read Teare’s report or even spoken to him directly…If Teare is committing himself to a 100mg blood alcohol content at time of ingestion of the pills he is too experienced a pathologist to not have something to back it up because an autopsy is a serious legal event that is held accountable to strict legal standards…He obviously had knowledge of the wine to make that assumption…And there is your proof of the wine and knowledge of it by the medical professionals involved…Which is also proof of malfeasance by the London Coroner’s Office because they were required by medical law to investigate why there was so much wine, that Teare admitted to with his 100mg estimation, but then failed to act upon pathologically as was his duty in relation to the trace blood alcohol content…100mg is 5 glasses of wine or a whole bottle…In effect the autopsist just officially recognized the wine – thank you…We have proof of malfeasance because the Coroner’s Office once again went the opposite way on Dr Crompton’s determination that the undigested rice grains in Jimi’s stomach, that were identified by Teare, were proof Jimi died no later than 5:30am…Teare was required to input that in to his determinations but failed to do so…What we have here is PROOF that the Coroner’s Office had in its possession at the time enough information to show homicide and failed to do its required job…
Thank you, Buster and I am going to touch on something else noteworthy.
Kathy Etchingham’s investigation has been spoken about by these liars, but they seemingly avoid one particular regarding that investigation.
And that is — Kathy noted that the people who were there at the Samarkand that morning such Stickells, Burdon, Barrett, Slater were all totally reluctant to talk to the authorities during her investigation in the early 1990’s. Why would they be reluctant to talk to the authorities if there was no foul play involved? And why did they just leave Jimi’s body to be found hours later with massive amounts of dried vomit?
Monika’s Opel sports car was sitting right outside that Samarkand flat, so that means they already had a way of transporting Jimi to the hospital. Why didn’t they get Jimi on his feet and put him into that Opel sports car & take him to a nearby hospital? Why was Jimi just left for dead like that to have the ambulance men find him in the state that they did?
That’s right, Buster
Jason has repeatedly regurgitated his self-decreed fabrication pulled straight out of his ass, that Bannister had told the media that Jimi died from drug overdose. And yet, Jason hasn’t produced one single reference source or piece of documentation to back this up — quite simply due to the fact that there is none to be found, as it never happened.
In fact, if your read this article, it suggests that it was Bob Brown that spoke with the media, which is plausible because he didn’t assist with the treatment of Jimi during the 30 minute time frame of 11:45AM up till 12:15PM.
http://theorstrahyun.blogspot.com/2009/07/bob-brown-on-claims-jimi-hendrix-was.html
Apparently Bob Brown said Dr Bannister signed the death certificate…So I’ll have to look in to it…Google has scrubbed any articles where Bob Brown mentions the full story and his detection of the wine…Google allows itself to be information screened by CIA (which shows you in an indirect way what we are dealing with and how the real evidence forces such dirty corruption)…
We have two trolls pathetically making up their own scenarios.
No wine was ever witnessed at the Hendrix death scene by anybody.
The two wine hoaxers lost their case already.
Buster the wine hoaxer is now forced to lie about what ambulance man John Saua and Reginal Jones said in their testimony so this fraud can still claim imaginary wine.
John Saua and Reginal Jones never said a word about “a hard cork of vomit” inside Hendrix. Buster the wine Hoaxer lied and fraudulently made this up.
John Saua and Reginal Jones never mentioned the word wine or ever witnessed any wine at the Hendrix death scene. But Buster the wine Hoaxer pathetically tries to still claim they saw wine.
Meanwhile his hoaxing sidekick “Flyswatter” parrots his garbage as his shadow. These two clowns have no evidence for wine.
No wine was ever witnessed or testified to at the Hendrix death scene.
If there was gallons of wine, the police would have sealed off the flat for a crime scene.
Hendrix was a normal regular overdose which is why they never made it one.
There was never any wine and these wine hoaxers lose their phony claim right from the get go at the Hendrix death scene.
No wine was ever witnessed. You can’t have no wine at the flat and magic wine later.
These two wine trolls lose every time.
Two ambulance men who witnessed the death scene saw no wine.
Two police men who were called by the ambulance men saw no wine.
Coroner’s officers who took the pills and blankets for forensic analysis saw no wine either.
All these professionals who regularly witnessed death scenes determined it to be an overdose. Not one of these men witnessed wine.
There was no wine at the flat and pathetically these two wine hoaxers invent fake wine at the flat.
These frauds have no case. 9 years and counting they repeat the same b.s. over and over and the outcome is still the same.
No wine was ever witnessed at the flat.
Even Kathy Etchingham believes Jimi wasn’t murdered in a phony wine drowning. She did a real investigation.
Alan Douglas never believed Jimi was “murdered” by Jeffery either.
There was no wine at the flat.
Wine hoaxers can invent all the fake stories they want. No wine was ever in the flat.
Catch a troll by the tail and Jason’s dishonest responses are what you get…Jason is cuckoo-birding that there was no wine at the flat but he is ignorant that Monika’s statement to the Inquest included the story of making a spaghetti dinner for Jimi with which Monika said she and Jimi had some wine…I have also seen articles where it was mentioned that Jimi took two bottles of wine with him from Kameron’s party and Monika said she bought two bottles of wine that afternoon for the flat…Terry Slater said he noticed that there were no food preparation facilities at the Samarkand flat…
Here is ambulance attendant John Saua’s statement about what he witnessed:
~ ~ ~ The other ambulance attendant, John Suau, gave a version remarkably similar as Reginal Jones’s version, although the two men had not spoken since they worked together in September 1970. Jones’s regular partner was off that week and Saua filled in. Afterwards, the two men never saw each other again. The following is Saua’s version of events, as told to Tony Brown:
“Well I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out (with an aspirator). I mean the vomit was dry, and there was a hell of a lot of it. The aspirators in those days were all right but not like you have today, they couldn’t shift that lot. I mean we knew it was hopeless, nothing would have worked. To tell the truth, I thought it was an overdose. It wasn’t really my business to diagnose, I just had to keep working. There were no bed clothes on top of him. An ambulance crew by law just has to keep on working on him until we get him to the hospital. There was no pulse, no respiration. We got down to the flat, and there was nobody but the body on the bed. So we had to radio for the police from the ambulance. We couldn’t touch anything in the flat. As I say, we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed, but I didn’t recognize him, don’t know anybody would have recognized him, his mother wouldn’t have recognized him. He was in a pool of vomit, it was everywhere, but we are not doctors, it’s our job to keep trying till we get him to the hospital, we can’t proclaim him dead…I vaguely remember taking a sample of the vomit in a container, because we didn’t know what he had taken. So as soon as the police arrived, we were off. I was in the back with Jimi, Reg drove. When we moved him, the gases were gurgling, you get when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant. The vomit was all the way down, we couldn’t have got an airway down. He was flat on his back, it’s a shame he wasn’t on his side because he probably would have pulled through.” ~ ~ ~
The liquid nature of the vomit was something that made Saua use the word “pool”…This is silly because Jason is refusing to answer that Dr Brown noticed the wine because he remarked Jimi had obviously had too much to drink…If Dr Brown noticed the wine then the thing that made the vomit pool was obviously that same wine…If Brown noticed the wine at St Mary’s then it is automatic that the ambulance men witnessed it even more at its Samarkand point of origin…It is very obvious that if we asked Jones and Saua did you see or smell any wine on Jimi they would have immediately described the wine just as Thurston, Brown, and Bannister did…
Jason totally dodged giving any answer to the fact Dr Teare entered the wine on to the medical record by entering Jimi had a 100mg blood alcohol content at the time he took the Vesparax…By doing that Teare is recognizing the wine because that was the only thing that could have produced that blood alcohol content…At the Inquest Monika said she and Jimi had some wine with that spaghetti dinner…That wine could be the only thing that would cause the 100mg blood alcohol content…Monika was lying by the way…She was trying to cover-up the fact they had gone to Harvey’s…Monika said Jimi took the pills at 7am so that 100mg could only have come in the hours prior to 7am at the flat…So that is PROOF the medical record contains evidence for wine being at the Samarkand…Jason stupidly ignores it because he can’t answer the proof he called for like the silly troll he is…Jason said why would Monika call the cops at 6am and expose herself?…But he stupidly ignores Monika lied and said Jimi was alive when the ambulance took him away at 11:30…The ambulance was not called until 11:18…Jason ignores this like a moron…
Jason: Please answer directly what the source was for the 100mg blood alcohol content Dr Teare entered on the autopsy record?…
As you know Buster, he (Jason) won’t answer any germane points made that don’t fit his phony narrative.
All Jason, along with his side-kick Ivana, have done in this thread is represent two-thirds of the Three Stooges.
Wine hoaxing troll Buster the clown destroyed his phony wine hoax by posting the ambulance men’s testimony for all to see. I thank him very much for that.
A desperate wine troll like Buster is trying to use one bottle of wine that was shared during dinner for his phony wine claim. And his moron sidekick “swatter” parrots along the same nonsense. 2 moron wine clowns.
Buster the wine hoaxing clown is still 5 bottles short to claim his phony wine drowning. That’s how stupid he is. Laugh out loud hilarious.
Buster like the true moron he is, tries to claim a “pool” is “red wine”. Asinine.
John Saua and Reginal Jones only testified to witnessing brown vomit and never any “red wine”. Red wine would be obvious to these men. There was no “gallons of red wine” any where. That’s why they never mentioned “red wine”
Doctor Brown never noticed any wine on Jimi. All Brown said was “Jimi had a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. You are a liar.
Thurston never said word about wine. Sharon Lawrence made up a fake quote in her book claiming he did. Thurston said Jimi died of inhalation of vomit due to a barbiturate overdose.
Teare detected no abnormal amounts of wine through forensic in the autopsy. That kills your phony wine claim as well.
Hi Jason. The blood and urine samples are taken routinely as a normal part of an autopsy. One of the hoaxers suggested that Dr. Teare decided to take a sample because of the copious amount of wine he noticed. Dr. Teare then established that it was the barbiturate level and not the alcohol content which killed Jimi. No where does it state that Jimi’s death was alcohol related; if it was then the death certificate would have shown this alongside the barbiturate level. Dr. Bannister’s statements about that morning directly contradict what Dr. Seifert said that they pounded Jimi’s heart for a very short while as he had clearly been dead for a long time as the ambulance officers also witnessed. Imagine transporting an unconscious man to the hospital Monika did not do this because Jimi was dead having swallowed a lethal dose of Vesparax with wine?/water which caused him to choke to death fully dressed on top of the bed. Jason have you noticed the five bottles of wine have turned into five glasses. Gerry Stickells said at the time of Kathy’s investigation that the re-opening of the case would be a waste of time and that anyone who remembers what went on decades previously would be making it up. I clearly remember reading this in our national paper at the time. Monika also hired a private detective to help with the investigation. Jimi would have drunk wine at Kameron’s party and Harvey’s get together then this would account for his blood and urine alcohol level and content. If there was any wine at the Samarkand then the vomit would have contained this along with the barbiturate in the sample collected.
Ivana is lying here…Neither myself or Flyswatter said Dr Teare decided to take any samples because of wine he witnessed…The whole idea of this case is that Teare never saw the extreme amounts of wine that Bannister and Siefert did at St Mary’s because it was removed and disposed of…Ivana’s statements are idiotic because anyone who credibly knew what they were talking about (which clearly is not Ivana) would know Teare took all the samples he would have taken at any routine autopsy…
Dr Teare never established that it was the barbiturate level that killed Jimi and Ivana won’t be able to find any quote for that…I believe Teare said .7mg was getting in the dangerous range but was not fatal…I have already explained why the 9 tablets Jimi took could not have been fatal by science…Especially for a person with Jimi’s tolerance…Jimi only had the pills in him for 2 hours or less and it is impossible for a person with Jimi’s tolerance to overdose on Vesparax in only 2 hours…A person with a tolerance will not overdose from 9 Vesparax period…You can read the cause of death verdict on the report and it says asphyxiation due to barbiturate intoxication with an open verdict…That language means they didn’t really narrow down any cause of death and the specific cause was still open to determination…Nowhere did Dr Teare ever establish the barbiturate level killed Jimi…
Ivana is creating a dishonest strawman…Neither Flyswatter of myself ever said Jimi’s death was alcohol related…The reason the Death Certificate never said barbiturates and alcohol is because they knew they couldn’t get away with it with only a trace blood alcohol content…Dr Teare didn’t even believe his 100mg estimate himself because if he had he would have entered it in the cause of death entry…The fact Teare omitted alcohol from his cause of death explanation shows that he knew there wasn’t really 100mg at time of ingestion of the pills and that he couldn’t get away with his estimate…That right there is proof of corruption in the autopsy…
By the time Dr Siefert made his statement he had obviously been brought in on the cover-up and was avoiding mentioning the incriminating wine…Siefert had a good career following his witnessing of Jimi’s murder and never lost his license…Remember, Siefert is on video tape saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…
Ivana continues to moronically ignore that Jimi, with his tolerance, could not possibly have had such an extreme vomiting reaction in only 1 to 2 hours after taking the pills…Ivana ignores that normal choking on vomit deaths do not show such extreme vomiting as the ambulance men witnessed…Jimi could not have had such an extreme vomiting reaction if his nervous system were experiencing a lethal barbiturate paralysis…Ivana moronically ignores the time factor of the forensics…This is what Teare should have determined but he didn’t because the investigation was suppressed as it occurred…
No honest person could say either Flyswatter or myself are saying only 5 glasses of wine were involved…Ivana is lying there and showing a mendacious inability to accurately relate an argument…What was said was when Dr Teare estimated that Jimi had a 100mg blood alcohol content at the time of ingestion of the pills that 100mg equals about 5 glasses of wine…It was clearly said that Dr Teare therefore acknowledged the wine at the Samarkand when he acknowledged that 5 glasses worth of wine (100mg)…Both Flyswatter and myself still stand by the 5 bottles of wine Dr Bannister said he removed from Jimi at hospital and that the cause of death was physical drowning in wine…
Gerry Stickells was loyal to Michael Jeffery and was a liar…He was involved in the cover-up and knew Jimi was murdered…He lied to the Inquest…Of course he said what Ivana quotes above because he had skin in the game over his involvement…Any honest intelligent person could see just from what we have shown that reopening the case would be very worthwhile if you have any appreciation of telling the truth for Jimi and doing justice…I love it when lying deniers quote those doing the cover-up and try to ignore context…Gerry kept his mouth shut and had a very lucrative career as the manager of Queen (He didn’t lose his license)…
As far as I know the last wine Jimi drank was at Harvey’s at 10pm…In any case the 5mg blood alcohol content showed that Jimi had not drank that much and the last wine he ingested was well before he took the pills…
Ivana and Jason are referring to vomit testing that they can’t produce any evidence for…
Yes Buster, just where the hell do these Two-Thirds of the Three Stooges get this “vomit testing” nonsense from? No such thing is stated in the autopsy report. Just another fabrication that they are pulling out of their ass. There is no documentation to be found anywhere regarding the vomit sample that John Saua took. Saua never made any statement about any vomit sample testing being done.
Jason says “We have two trolls pathetically making up their own scenarios”.
TRANSLATED: Pot meet kettle & we are both colored black. Only one recourse — accuse the other side of that which Jason is guilty of. Good job by Jason of giving the correct description of himself. And it’s noteworthy that Jason can’t provide any
credible reference sources to back his claim of Buster and I making our own scenarios, as he can only provide self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass, so Jason has nothing left other than to accuse others of that which he is guilty of.
Jason says “No wine was ever witnessed at the Hendrix death scene by anybody.
The two wine hoaxers lost their case already.”
Jason is clearly living in his world of self-delusion with his self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass. All Jason is telling anybody with this, is that he can’t answer or refute the point made earlier that if Bob Brown saw the wine — hence Brown’s claim of Jimi having “too much to drink” — then so did the ambulance men. Simple as that. Neither of these two statements by Jason answer the question of “what would make Bob Brown think Jimi had anything to drink if there was no wine?”. None of Jason’s blather answers Monika telling both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand on the day Jimi died.
Jason says “John Saua and Reginal Jones never said a word about “a hard cork of vomit” inside Hendrix. Buster the wine Hoaxer lied and fraudulently made this up.
John Saua and Reginal Jones never mentioned the word wine or ever witnessed any wine at the Hendrix death scene. But Buster the wine Hoaxer pathetically tries to still claim they saw wine.”
The part about the vomit was, in fact, mentioned by John Saua and he said his equipment couldn’t penetrate the vomit in Jimi’s throat. Saua told this to Kathy Etchingham, Michael Fairchild, Tony Brown, and later on to Martin Shankleman. Therefore, there obviously was vomit plugged in Jimi’s throat because Saua said so. So Jason’s accusation of Buster lying about this is false. Neither of the ambulance men ever stated that they didn’t see any wine, at any time.
Jason says “Meanwhile his hoaxing sidekick “Flyswatter” parrots his garbage as his shadow. These two clowns have no evidence for wine.
No wine was ever witnessed or testified to at the Hendrix death scene.”
We have multiple testimonies of the men that were there at the time making reference to the wine. We also have Monika telling both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day that Jimi died, which totally contradicts Jason’s claim of nobody testifying to wine at the Hendrix death scene. Where is Jason’s evidence at of “no wine” or any credible reference sources to back his claim? But of course, Jason has none — he only has his self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass & Jason tries to delude himself into thinking this automatically overturns the testimonies of those that were there at the time, but it doesn’t.
Jason says “If there was gallons of wine, the police would have sealed off the flat for a crime scene.
Hendrix was a normal regular overdose which is why they never made it one.”
Who said anything about “gallons of wine”, other than Jason? Ripping things out of context, as usual by Jason. And nice job by Jason exposing his lack of knowledge
regarding this case, because if Jason had any pertinent knowledge, then he would already know that ambulance man Reg Jones told Kathy Etchingham that the police
didn’t declare it a crime scene because they didn’t want to fill out the paperwork & that the police told the ambulance men to go ahead and take this John Doe casualty to the hospital & it wasn’t until later on in the day that they found out that this was Jimi Hendrix. So Jason’s statement of “Hendrix was a normal regular overdose which is why they never made it one.” is just another self-decreed fabrication that Jason is pulling out of his ass.
Jason says “There was never any wine and these wine hoaxers lose their phony claim right from the get go at the Hendrix death scene.
No wine was ever witnessed. You can’t have no wine at the flat and magic wine later.”
Multiple testimonies by multiple people that were there at that time say that there was wine. Monika told both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day that Jimi died. Jason continues with his self-delusional thinking that his self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass automatically overturns the multiple testimonies of the people that were there at time.
Jason says “These two wine trolls lose every time.”
Lose what? We’ve lost nothing, as evidenced by multiple germane points we have made that Jason can’t answer directly, but can only side-step with his evasive blather that consists of self-decreed fabrications that Jason pulls out of his ass & proves Jason to be nothing but a lover and maker of lies.
Desperate lying wine troll. Reginal Jones and John Saua never saw Hendrix soaked in wine or any wine around him. There was no “hard plug of vomit”. He said it was an overdose. No mention of wine anywhere by anyone at the flat. Even Kathy Etchingham says there was no wine drowning.
Buster stop with your make believe scenarios because that is what they really are. How do you know that Gerry Stickells was a liar and dishonest in covering up Jimi’s murder. This is coming from your mind; it is merely speculation and conjecture disguised as fact. Being an outsider how can you honestly know anything about these people since you had absolutely nothing to do with them. You have refused to accept for whatever reason that Jimi’s death was not alcohol but drug related. I have asked you before to reveal who the murderer is since it has been established that Michael Jeffrey was in Spain waiting for Jimi to fly over to Majorca to meet up. Gerry Stickells had a career with Queen because he was a competent manager; do you really believe this rock group would employ a corrupt human being to handle their affairs. I’m sure of one thing though if these people were alive today you would be the one keeping his mouth shut. Fortunately for Jason and myself we do not have your negative mindset but a reasonable one. You have spent years of your life devoted to this subject and it comes across as a life wasted quite frankly speculating on a murder that never happened in real life; just what were you hoping to achieve with your multiple posts on various threads? You have accused a number of people of being corrupt and coerced into changing their stories but you always fail to disclose who did the coercing. Please supply the names of these sources and please supply the name of the murderer/s so that Jason and I can verify them, and please do not try to get out of this one with more speculation.
Ivana, it was clear long ago that you have no idea what you are talking about and simply offer over-generalized crap that any nay-saying troll who ran across this thread while having a keyboard would offer…You have to be pretty stupid if you think that you represent any credible side to this beyond an internet troll seeking opportunities to deny, or that we should give you any serious consideration…
Speaking of “speculation disguised as fact” I see you gave no answer to my categorical correction of your wrong information above…So seeing how you can’t even give a response to a whole post of false claims I corrected, you have real balls turning to me and accusing me of making up false scenarios…
You two denying trolls have bitten off more than you can chew and any intelligent person who reads this thread can see that you are wandering around in the darkness of your own ignorance hoping one of those idiotically over-generalized comments you make will land a blow…It doesn’t work that way and, as I said before, you can’t respond to superior arguments of evidence with the idiotic crap you do and pretend you are arguing on an equal basis…Every time you have your material shredded like I did in my last post you sink further in to uncredibility and therefore less right to participate…You and Jason are repeatedly ignoring and refusing to give an answer to the best evidence ever presented on this subject and you do not deserve further airing past that…You both simply see this as getting attention that gives you the excuse for another round of BS replies…
You or Jason could not show where Flyswatter and myself are making up false scenarios…Our material is based on the best references and sources – which is why you and Jason cannot answer it in public…If you knew anything about this case you would know your phony taking offense over Stickells is laughable because he was deep in to it and knew a lot more than he told…He lied to Tony Brown when he told him Terry Slater called between 8 and 9am and failed to mention the Samarkand as being the location where Jimi was “having trouble at the hotel”…Any fool can see that wording used by Stickells was deliberately designed to get Stickells off the legal follow-through the persons who fabricated that phrase knew would come…Stickells lied and obviously tried to make an excuse for his not knowing about the Samarkand that was only two blocks from his own flat…Any fool can see he was trying too hard to convince the Inquest he had no idea about the Samarkand…We know Stickells was lying because we know Mitch Mitchell got pulled in to the same lie when he spoke about trying to call Jimi from Stickells’ flat the evening Jimi died…Mitch lied and said he called the Cumberland hotel…Only a fool would avoid imagining that Mitch went to the Samarkand but Monika and Jimi had gone to Harvey’s by that time so Mitch went right around the block to Gerry’s to ring them up…In any case Ivana (who is obviously way over her head in criminal detection on this subject) moronically ignores that we know Jimi was dead at 5:30am – so Stickells is lying if he says Slater rang him at 9 and only said Jimi was in trouble when we know Jimi was stone dead for several hours by that time…It never troubles Ivana’s dull brow that Monika said she woke up a little after 10am to the Inquest or that Stickells locked himself in to a lie when he told Tony Brown that Slater called him between 8 and 9am…Because Ivana’s purpose is to just nay-say anything she sees she never troubles herself to realize we have proof the authorities were corrupted because they had this information about this fatal conflict in their possession and did not act upon it…Just look at Ivana’s moronic treatment of this vs mine…
Your statement that I refuse to accept that Jimi’s death wasn’t alcohol related is deliberately dishonest…Anyone can read my response to your previously saying that and see you are dishonestly using disqualifyingly overly-general semantics to get around answering what I told you in my last post…Your wording is inherently deceptive because anyone who reads “alcohol-related” would think it involved consumed alcohol and a drug conflict chemical reaction…You are lying here Ivana because you know as well as I that I am saying there was no significant consumed alcohol and that the “alcohol” involved was forced wine that drowned Jimi physically…Your answer conspicuously avoids recognizing that or honestly answering it so you are therefore showing the public dishonest intent…If I were moderator I would ban you for it…
It is also incredibly stupid to project nobility on to the rock industry…People in the know will tell you it was extremely corrupt and persons like Jeffery and their perfidy were quite common…So saying noble industry insiders would reject Stickells because of the scandal of Jimi’s murder is laughable considering the real truth is his ability to lie and preserve large sums of money for the murderers is what made him desirable…I mean just look at the lack of interest in this subject by even Hendrix’s main asshole internet fans if you want to see the real deal on your Knights Of Rock N Roll gentry and their noble standard…
Hey Buster….
You notice how Ivana says “Please supply the names of these sources and please supply the name of the murderer/s so that Jason and I can verify them, and please do not try to get out of this one with more speculation.”
I got a suggestion for her. She can go to the same place that she’s been getting her self-decreed fabrications and lying misquotes from. In other words, she can go dig the answer out of own ass.
You are the only one who is corrupt here. You have defamed anyone and everyone who does not fit in with your agenda. You write nothing but lies concealed as fact; you are not in the “know” as you pretend to be just a silly fool spreading nonsense wherever you can. The articles published close to Jimi’s death reveal the real and true cause of death; these fabrications about Jimi being murdered were added years later by tin foil hatters like yourself and people out to make a quick dollar through books that have been exposed to be fraudulent and have ended up in the dustbin where they belong. Publishers need gullible fools who lap up what is being said in these types of books, and you have fallen for more than one-Tappy Wright and Albert Allen and Dr. Bannister’s account. Are these the best sources and references you are talking about or is it Flyswatter LOL? Jimi’s death has been described as an accidental overdose and not a murder. We all know Michael Jeffrey, the alleged murderer, was in Spain at the time of Jimi’s death verified by two people therefore who was the killer and what was the method since the waterboarding story relies on Michael Jeffrey being in London to do the waterboarding. This clearly shows that this story is a hoax.
LOL — look at the two desperate lying-denying pigbreeders named Jason and Ivana continue to wallow in their own pigshite mire of denial of reality. Spewing the same garbage with no credible reference sources to back it up & still pulling self-decreed fabrications out of their asses & yet still not able to answer:
1) What would make Bob Brown think Jimi had anything to drink if there was no wine?
2) Monika telling both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand on the day Jimi died.
Drinking wine is not the same as being waterboarded to death with it which is what you and Buster have been insinuating all along. Have you changed tactics after being exposed as the hoaxers that you really are. You are clearly heading in the same direction as your other murder conspiracy theorists mates.
Ivana: How could Jimi be “drinking wine” with only a trace 5mg blood alcohol content at his autopsy?…
And how could there be no wine at the Samarkand, as the troll Jason insists, if Jimi was “drinking wine”…You’re obviously clueless so you probably don’t understand that Monika locked herself in to a timeline where Jimi did not take any pills until 7am…So for Jimi to be drinking would require it to be during those 4 hours from when he got back to the Samarkand at 3am to when he ingested the Vesparax at 7am…So reality dictates there would have to be wine at the Samarkand…
Please answer directly how Jimi could be simply casually “drinking wine” at the Samarkand while ending up with what Dr Siefert described as being “Covered in wine”…Dr Bannister also described this and Dr Brown mentioned it to…
Quite correct, Buster….Ivana just contradicted the very same “no wine” rhetoric of Jason’s that she had been singing praises to earlier.
What these two liars (Jason and Ivana) fail to understand is that if they weren’t such lovers of makers of lies — like they have proven that they are — then they wouldn’t be making themselves look as STUPID as they do in this thread
Buster the wine hoaxing clown carefully uses language attempting to make himself appear credible. He writes in an authoritative tone pretending to be an authority. But when all the smoke clears, you can see he only has excuses and his own opinion of what he believes happened to Hendrix. With that, he then claims to be a “superior authority” after he suppresses the real evidence by claiming everything is a “cover up” and everybody is “lying”. It is very laughable.
In Buster’s phony bag of debating tricks, he tries to claim he is “superior”, which he definitely is not, it is insecurity on his part. When you disagree with his garbage theories, he says “you are denying good evidence” and calls you a troll. The truth is, his “evidence” is crap and anybody with an ounce of common sense laughs at it.
After real evidence refutes his phony claims, he says there is a “cover up”, “Jeffery got to them”, “they all are lying”. That is a joke. He will deny Jimi’s drug overdose by claiming he had “famous tolerance”. That is a bogus personal opinion. He gets by for not having to show evidence of wine by claiming “Bannister dumped it out”. Totally absurd. And then pathetically, Buster deliberately distorts and makes up false claims about what ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones testified to. Buster the clown fraudulently tries to claim the words “vomit” and “pool” means wine so he still can make his phony wine claim. Beyond pathetic. Don’t forget he also accuses Dr. Teare of a “cover up” forging autopsy numbers which is ludicrous.
I know Buster the clown’s phony game better than he does. He is a one trick pony who can only engage using word play in his phony debate style. Buster the clown has no evidence but uses his aggressive debate style to prove his phony theory. He only cares about debating since all the real evidence refutes his phony claims. This is all a debate to him, he doesn’t want it to be about facts or real evidence since he will always lose.
All the readers know his game by now too, but his phony game never produces any real evidence. This is why he plays these debate games pretending he is a credible authority. When he becomes cornered, he will attack you and then will whine that the person should be banned. Then he claims he is “superior” and you “forfeited the debate”. Phony debating and word games is all Buster the clown has. The reading public doesn’t buy what he claims for one minute. Read all Buster’s words and watch for his phony debate word play. It’s very easy to see. All words full of smoke and mirrors with zero evidence. His sentences are riddled with these tricks. Watch carefully what Buster does.
BUSTER says: Ivana, it was clear long ago that you have no idea what you are talking about and simply offer over-generalized crap that any nay-saying troll who ran across this thread while having a keyboard would offer…You have to be pretty stupid if you think that you represent any credible side to this beyond an internet troll seeking opportunities to deny, or that we should give you any serious consideration.
JASON says: The only troll here is you, who smears and suppresses the real evidence for your phony conspiracy theories. Everybody who reads this page can easily see it. Buster is engaging in word play games pretending to be an authority. He does this in every sentence he writes. The rest of his sentences are more of the same. Heavy on words with zero substance is what he specializes in.
BUSTER says: You two denying trolls have bitten off more than you can chew and any intelligent person who reads this thread can see that you are wandering around in the darkness of your own ignorance hoping one of those idiotically over-generalized comments you make will land a blow…It doesn’t work that way and, as I said before, you can’t respond to superior arguments of evidence with the idiotic crap you do and pretend you are arguing on an equal basis…Every time you have your material shredded like I did in my last post you sink further in to uncredibility and therefore less right to participate…
JASON says: Buster the clown is engaging in more word play games and is pretending to be an “authority”. This is hilarious and pathetic. This is all Buster the clown has in his phony bag of debate tricks. He has nothing else except smoke and mirrors.
You are a joke, and everybody can see that who reads this page. You are a murder wine troll who suppresses the real evidence .Your phony argument has been shredded from the beginning. You believed in a fraud liar Tappy Wright and you parroted his claims all along until you learned Jeffery was in Spain and then you changed your tune and your whole story. When you are refuted by evidence, you immediately claim a “cover up” and blame Jeffery. That is weak and pathetic. Your “arguments” are made up fantasy, that only you have the answers to, so you can claim you are “superior authority”. All you can do is attack dead people who can’t defend themselves against your false accusations. Your so called “evidence” is based on unconfirmed accusations and innuendos that you read from books and believe is true. You are a “wannabe researcher Hendrix guru”.
BUSTER says: You and Jason are repeatedly ignoring and refusing to give an answer to the best evidence ever presented on this subject and you do not deserve further airing past that…You both simply see this as getting attention that gives you the excuse for another round of BS replies.
JASON says: We refute your so called “evidence” cuz it’s all made up bullshit. There is no truth to it at all. Everybody reading this page can see it. The real evidence that Ivana and myself provide, you suppress it with your bogus garbage to further your fake conspiracy.
BUSTER says: You or Jason could not show where Flyswatter and myself are making up false scenarios…Our material is based on the best references and sources – which is why you and Jason cannot answer it in public…
JASON says: Hilarious! You are a clown. The majority of my posts show where you lie and make up false scenarios. Your bogus claim of a “hard cork of vomit” is a perfect example. John Saua and Reginal Jones never ever said they witnessed a “hard cork of vomit” inside Hendrix. Also your bullshit claim of “vomit” really means “wine” is fraudulent. Your “evidence” and “sources” comes from fraudulent people like Tappy Wright, Fraud Bannister, and Sharon Lawrence. All these people are liars and Bannister was convicted on 3 counts of fraud losing his medical license, Lawrence committed perjury in court, and Tappy Wright admitted he lied to sell books. These are your phony sources Buster, and you still have no idea why people laugh and ignore the garbage you peddle. Bogus sources is not the “best references and sources” as you ridiculously claim.
BUSTER says: If you knew anything about this case you would know your phony taking offense over Stickells is laughable because he was deep in to it and knew a lot more than he told…He lied to Tony Brown when he told him Terry Slater called between 8 and 9am and failed to mention the Samarkand as being the location where Jimi was “having trouble at the hotel”…Any fool can see that wording used by Stickells was deliberately designed to get Stickells off the legal follow-through the persons who fabricated that phrase knew would come…Stickells lied and obviously tried to make an excuse for his not knowing about the Samarkand that was only two blocks from his own flat…Any fool can see he was trying too hard to convince the Inquest he had no idea about the Samarkand…We know Stickells was lying because we know Mitch Mitchell got pulled in to the same lie when he spoke about trying to call Jimi from Stickells’ flat the evening Jimi died…Mitch lied and said he called the Cumberland hotel…Only a fool would avoid imagining that Mitch went to the Samarkand but Monika and Jimi had gone to Harvey’s by that time so Mitch went right around the block to Gerry’s to ring them up…In any case Ivana (who is obviously way over her head in criminal detection on this subject) moronically ignores that we know Jimi was dead at 5:30am – so Stickells is lying if he says Slater rang him at 9 and only said Jimi was in trouble when we know Jimi was stone dead for several hours by that time…It never troubles Ivana’s dull brow that Monika said she woke up a little after 10am to the Inquest or that Stickells locked himself in to a lie when he told Tony Brown that Slater called him between 8 and 9am…Because Ivana’s purpose is to just nay-say anything she sees she never troubles herself to realize we have proof the authorities were corrupted because they had this information about this fatal conflict in their possession and did not act upon it…Just look at Ivana’s moronic treatment of this vs mine…
JASON says: Trying to blame Stickells doesn’t make red wine appear that the flat that not one human witnessed being on Jimi Hendrix or on the bed. You are also engaging in more word play games pretending to be an authority using your own personal opinions. What you are blathering about is not credible evidence and is only second hand information that you read in a book. Unless you have red wine on Hendrix and on the bed you have no case. The ambulance men saw no wine on Hendrix or on the bed in the flat. You have no case so you debate insignificant nonsense instead.
BUSTER says: Your statement that I refuse to accept that Jimi’s death wasn’t alcohol related is deliberately dishonest…Anyone can read my response to your previously saying that and see you are dishonestly using disqualifyingly overly-general semantics to get around answering what I told you in my last post…Your wording is inherently deceptive because anyone who reads “alcohol-related” would think it involved consumed alcohol and a drug conflict chemical reaction…You are lying here Ivana because you know as well as I that I am saying there was no significant consumed alcohol and that the “alcohol” involved was forced wine that drowned Jimi physically…Your answer conspicuously avoids recognizing that or honestly answering it so you are therefore showing the public dishonest intent…If I were moderator I would ban you for it…
JASON says: You are a coward Buster, that’s why you would ban Ivana and me. You can’t defend your phony claims and you want the real evidence suppressed. Here you whine about being banned in various forums, but you want to ban people who disagree with you. You are a hypocrite. There is no evidence that Hendrix was “forced drowned”. Nothing in the autopsy by Teare showed any “forced wine drowning”. But then you lie claiming Jeffery “covered it all up” and claim your phony victory. Like I said, you are a joke and everybody reading can see it.
BUSTER says: It is also incredibly stupid to project nobility on to the rock industry…People in the know will tell you it was extremely corrupt and persons like Jeffery and their perfidy were quite common…So saying noble industry insiders would reject Stickells because of the scandal of Jimi’s murder is laughable considering the real truth is his ability to lie and preserve large sums of money for the murderers is what made him desirable.
JASON says: It is well known that managers took most of the money from their clients, moron. Jeffery took 40% of Jimi’s earnings that was legally documented in his contract. Managers weren’t out “murdering” their clients like the bogus claims you make. Jeffery had no motive to kill Jimi. He wasn’t fired and the contract ran for two and a half more years. You are a clown who pretends to be an “authority”.
It’s hilarious to watch these two wine trolls make excuses for imaginary wine.
They claim Hendrix was covered and soaked in wine and so was the bedding around him.
Both ambulance men witnessed Hendrix dead on the bed and neither one of them saw any wine on Hendrix or around him on the bed. If bottles of wine drowned Hendrix, red wine would be obvious to these men. They said nothing about wine.
Reginal Jones performed examinations on Hendrix to check for signs of life. He witnessed only vomit on Hendrix and never mentioned the word wine. If Hendrix has wine coming out of his nose, Jones would have felt it and seen it when he pinched Hendrix’s nose for signs of life. No wine was ever witnessed.
John Saua used an aspirator on Hendrix and sucked out dry vomit. He never sucked out any wine. If Hendrix was drowned in wine with with it spilling out of his mouth, Saua would have witnessed it and the aspirator would have been sucking wine. There was also no “hard plug of vomit” that Buster the wine Hoaxer lied about.
The room would have smelled from wine and the entire area would be soaked in wine. Not one ambulance man, police man, coroner’s officer ever witnessed a wine drowning scene.
Buster the wine hoaxing troll now needs to pathetically lie claiming that “vomit” means wine and a “pool” means wine. He is a desperate troll reduced to using word play games since he has been defeated. Every person reading can see that wine is never mentioned at the Hendrix death scene from any person who was there to witness it.
Buster the wine Hoaxer is also desperate trying to claim the wine that Hendrix drank earlier at the parties and with Monika means there was wine. We already know that, but this Hoaxer can’t prove his phony wine drowning since Ambulance men, police men, and a coroner’s officer never witnessed this so called wine drowning scene .
These desperate wine trolls have easily been defeated by real expert witness testimony. You can’t have no wine at the death scene and then later claim there was a wine drowning.
Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose and John Saua said it appeared to be a drug overdose himself.
Desperate wine trolls have lost since there was no wine on Hendrix or on the bed at the flat.
Buster the hoaxing troll has no evidence of wine. All he can claim is a phony “cover up” for his so called wine drowning. He is pathetic making up nonsense as he pretends to be an authority. When real forensic evidence comes into play he loses. He has lost so he resorts to making up stuff against dead people. That is being a clown.
Jason is once again repeating the same thing over again and re-entering something that has already been explained repeatedly…It has already been explained that when a person throws up wine mixed with ingested food the expelled material is generally referred to as “vomit”…Jason knows this yet he is dishonestly ignoring it and pretending the whole issue depends on the ambulance men specifically saying that there was a lot of wine all over Jimi when they encountered him…Jason is trolling so because he is trolling he is playing word games instead of honestly admitting the facts…It has already been explained to him that Dr Brown said that when he witnessed Jimi he had obviously had too much to drink…The only thing that could have made Dr Brown say that is if he saw or smelled wine on Jimi…Since Dr Brown saw Jimi at St Mary’s, and the ambulance men saw Jimi at the Samarkand, that means the wine Dr Brown smelled would have been even more apparent at its point of origin at the Samarkand, so common sense tells you that is proof of the wine at the Samarkand because you could not have wine all over Jimi at the hospital unless it was all over him at the Samarkand…Jason refuses to give a direct answer to this because he knows it is true so instead he dishonestly tries to distort and take the ambulance men’s statements out of context…I am sure if we spoke to the ambulance men at the time they would have told us, yes, Jimi smelled like wine and it was part of the vomit…Jason also refused to answer Suau’s comment that Jimi was in a large “pool” of vomit…The liquid that caused that “pool” was obviously the wine that Dr Siefert said Jimi was covered in…
Jason once again ignores our explanation and repeats his lie that the ambulance men would have noticed the wine Jimi was drowned in…Jason does this right in the face of just having it explained to him that the ambulance men made clear that their equipment could not get through the hard dry vomit in Jimi’s throat…That means they never accessed the wine that was behind that vomit…Jason has had this clearly explained to him several times along with the quotes as reference…His response is to totally ignore it and just re-enter the same already-disproven claim again…Jason is using cheezy semantics to lie and avoid answering that the ambulance men made clear that they failed to clear the hard dry vomit and therefore never got to the wine that was behind it…Any credible person who has ever examined this knows the wine Bannister spoke of was wine that was exposed after Siefert had removed the vomit that the ambulance men failed to penetrate…Jason is lying by playing trollish word games to get around that…He’s a troll…
The ambulance men, police, and coroner’s office agent had no reason to think the scene was a forced drowning in wine scene because of what I have explained here…Jason is pretending he doesn’t understand this and is continuing to enter his regressive trolling bullshit as if it were sincere…He is perfectly aware that the wine he is saying wasn’t mentioned at the Samarkand was simply called “vomit”…It is also quite disingenuous of him to ignore that the Jeffery managers who were there did a 5 hour clean-up prior to that…Jason is a not too bright con man who is trying to convince you the witnesses at the Samarkand would have any reason during their rushed attempt to save Jimi to think of the wine as anything other than vomit…It is clear to any intelligent person that trolling Jason is desperately trying to force that cheap canard he is posting instead of answering the arguments he is ignoring…
What Jason is doing here is what trolls do when caught…They must always be on the offensive and be the ones asking the questions, otherwise it will become clear that they are badly losing the debate and uncredibly failing to answer the good evidence that refutes them…It’s called “seizing the narrative”…Jason thinks he has scored big with his cheap wine denial semantics but anyone reading this thread knows he is using his false bluster to avoid giving a simple answer to what exactly Dr Brown was referring to if not wine?…Flyswatter asked him to answer that several times but so far he has avoided doing it…What we have here is personnel at the Samarkand who had no reason to mention the wine content at the time of their witnessing…They called it “vomit” and noticed the liquid content by referring to it as a “pool” of vomit…At the hospital Dr Brown, Bannister, and Siefert all directly told of the wine…The reason Jason is refusing to give a direct answer to this is because he is fully aware multiple witnessings of the wine at the hospital automatically equates to wine being present at the death scene…Jason also uncredibly ignored Dr Teare confirming the wine at the Samarkand by referencing a 100mg blood alcohol content at the time of ingestion of the pills…Jason contemptuously dodged giving an honest answer to the fact that 100mg citation necessitates wine being at the Samarkand…
Tony Brown said Monika told him she kept a bottle of wine from the Samarkand…
The only one playing word games here is Buster the wine hoaxer. Buster is trying to claim that vomit means wine. We all know that is desperate and pathetic word games. That is called trolling. He does this cuz he has no evidence and is desperate to claim wine. He looks very foolish for doing so.
It already has been told to Buster that there was no wine witnessed at the flat. It has been told to him that vomit does not mean wine. It’s also been told to him that a pool does not mean wine. It has been told to him that Jimi Hendrix was not covered or drowned in wine cuz nobody ever witnessed that at the flat.
All we’ve heard from these wine trolls is that Jimi Hendrix was drenched in wine. They tell us there was this huge “murder scene” with gallons of wine spilled all over the place. Well, Reginal Jones and John Saua had an upclose view of everything and they saw no “murder scene wine drowning”. They did not see Jimi Hendrix covered in wine. They did not see any wine inside him when they used an aspirator on him. They did not see any gallons of wine on the bed or pillows. If there was this huge wine drowning, that would have been the first thing both men would have said. It would have been obvious. Not one man at the flat ever said anything about a wine drowning. Saua said it looked like a drug overdose. A drug overdose is not a wine drowning. Saua saw many of those during his time, so he knew what it was.
BUSTER says: The only thing that could have made Dr Brown say that is if he saw or smelled wine on Jimi…Since Dr Brown saw Jimi at St Mary’s, and the ambulance men saw Jimi at the Samarkand, that means the wine Dr Brown smelled would have been even more apparent at its point of origin at the Samarkand, so common sense tells you that is proof of the wine at the Samarkand because you could not have wine all over Jimi at the hospital unless it was all over him at the Samarkand…Jason refuses to give a direct answer to this because he knows it is true so instead he dishonestly tries to distort and take the ambulance men’s statements out of context…I am sure if we spoke to the ambulance men at the time they would have told us, yes, Jimi smelled like wine and it was part of the vomit…Jason also refused to answer Suau’s comment that Jimi was in a large “pool” of vomit…The liquid that caused that “pool” was obviously the wine that Dr Siefert said Jimi was covered in…
JASON says: Here we have more pathetic word games from Buster the wine hoaxer. We all can smell the desperation coming from you still desperately trying to claim wine. You are really embarrassing yourself.
All you are doing is making up your own fake theory trying to claim wine and pathetically lying. You’re the one distorting the testimony of the Ambulance Men. They both only said they witnessed vomit and you are trying to claim vomit means wine. Everybody can see what you are doing and we are all laughing.
Two ambulance men, two police officers and two coroner’s officers saw no wine at the flat. That’s 6 men not witnessing wine at the flat. 4 men saw Hendrix dead and saw no wine on him. 4 men saw Hendrix dead before Brown did. All Brown said was that Hendrix had “a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. So you are taking Brown’s words out of context since that does not mean he was drowned or covered in wine. Hendrix was drinking wine at Harvey’s and at Kameron’s so that was the ‘bit’ he drank. Brown never said he had “gallons of wine”.
Jimi was not “covered in wine”. Reginal Jones said Jimi was covered in vomit. He witnessed no wine on Jimi. He saw Jimi dead before any doctor did, so Jimi couldn’t be covered in wine.
A “pool” does not mean “wine” as you so desperately try to claim with your word games. This as is desperate as you can get. This is your own fault anyway for trying to claim 5 bottles of wine like a moron. Now you look awfully stupid not being able to account for your phony 5 bottles of wine claim.
BUSTER says: Jason once again ignores our explanation and repeats his lie that the ambulance men would have noticed the wine Jimi was drowned in…
JASON says: Your explanation is crap and you think two ambulance men wouldn’t notice gallons of wine if it was there? I am laughing so hard right now.
The ambulance men were examining Hendrix for signs of life and was using an aspirator on him. They witnessed no wine and Jimi was not drowned in wine. They saw no wine on or in Hendrix. More pathetic word games from you. Just admit you lost your phony claim. It will be much easier for you instead of keeping up this charade.
BUSTER says: Jason does this right in the face of just having it explained to him that the ambulance men made clear that their equipment could not get through the hard dry vomit in Jimi’s throat…That means they never accessed the wine that was behind that vomit…Jason has had this clearly explained to him several times along with the quotes as reference…His response is to totally ignore it and just re-enter the same already-disproven claim again…Jason is using cheezy semantics to lie and avoid answering that the ambulance men made clear that they failed to clear the hard dry vomit and therefore never got to the wine that was behind it…Any credible person who has ever examined this knows the wine Bannister spoke of was wine that was exposed after Siefert had removed the vomit that the ambulance men failed to penetrate…Jason is lying by playing trollish word games to get around that…He’s a troll…
JASON says: No, Mr. Wine Hoaxer, you are the wine troll. Jimi Hendrix was already dead on the bed. Both ambulance men stated that. The police man, John Saua and Reginal Jones said “there was nothing they could do for him”. Taking him to the hospital did nothing for him. That’s why they shipped him off to the morgue after. You are trying to claim that Hendrix was still alive to have procedures done on him.
Here we go again with you trying to make your phony wine claim. John Saua never said the vomit was hard and neither did Reginal Jones. You are making up more garbage. I’ve already written about this and I know everything about both their testimonies. There was no wine below hard vomit ready to burst for Bannister. Siefert never removed hard vomit. You are making a fool out of yourself.
The ambulance men never said anything about hard vomit or wine below. There was no wine.
You are claiming a wine drowning. Do you understand that? You said Hendrix was so full wine he was filled up to full capacity with wine spilling out of his mouth. A “hard plug of vomit” could not form as you are now trying to claim if liquid wine was coming out him. So you are debunking your own wine drowning theory. The reason the vomit was dry is that there was no wine drowning. There was no wine at all. You are totally making a fool of yourself and have no clue what you want to claim. We are all laughing.
BUSTER says: The ambulance men, police, and coroner’s office agent had no reason to think the scene was a forced drowning in wine scene because of what I have explained here…Jason is pretending he doesn’t understand this and is continuing to enter his regressive trolling bullshit as if it were sincere…He is perfectly aware that the wine he is saying wasn’t mentioned at the Samarkand was simply called “vomit”…It is also quite disingenuous of him to ignore that the Jeffery managers who were there did a 5 hour clean-up prior to that…Jason is a not too bright con man who is trying to convince you the witnesses at the Samarkand would have any reason during their rushed attempt to save Jimi to think of the wine as anything other than vomit…It is clear to any intelligent person that trolling Jason is desperately trying to force that cheap canard he is posting instead of answering the arguments he is ignoring.
JASON says: Buster the wine hoaxer still desperately and pathetically still trying to claim that vomit means wine. Give it up. We are all laughing at you, and no, vomit does not mean wine.
Dude, are you on drugs or something? Do you you even understand or remember the claims you make? You repeat all the time that there were gallons on wine all over the place. You claim Hendrix was soaked in gallons of wine and was filled to full capacity with 5 bottles worth of wine spilling out of his mouth. And you think if the police and ambulance men witnessed something like that they wouldn’t think it was a forced wine drowning? I’m laughing even harder. So, now you’re changing your story to that everything was cleaned up. You have no clue what you want to to claim. I think even you know how ridiculous your claims are that’s why you are changing everything into a whole new story. That’s pathetic.
The fact is there was no wine drowning so that’s why the Ambulance Men and the police men witnessed no wine at the flat.
BUSTER says: What Jason is doing here is what trolls do when caught…They must always be on the offensive and be the ones asking the questions, otherwise it will become clear that they are badly losing the debate and uncredibly failing to answer the good evidence that refutes them…It’s called “seizing the narrative”…Jason thinks he has scored big with his cheap wine denial semantics but anyone reading this thread knows he is using his false bluster to avoid giving a simple answer to what exactly Dr Brown was referring to if not wine?…Flyswatter asked him to answer that several times but so far he has avoided doing it…What we have here is personnel at the Samarkand who had no reason to mention the wine content at the time of their witnessing…They called it “vomit” and noticed the liquid content by referring to it as a “pool” of vomit…At the hospital Dr Brown, Bannister, and Siefert all directly told of the wine…The reason Jason is refusing to give a direct answer to this is because he is fully aware multiple witnessings of the wine at the hospital automatically equates to wine being present at the death scene…Jason also uncredibly ignored Dr Teare confirming the wine at the Samarkand by referencing a 100mg blood alcohol content at the time of ingestion of the pills…Jason contemptuously dodged giving an honest answer to the fact that 100mg citation necessitates wine being at the Samarkand…
JASON says: More word games I see. You’re the wine troll who has been caught. You lost your phony wine claim and are now spiraling out of control trying to make any bogus claim can make for wine. This is pathetic.
I’ve already talked about Brown. I’ve posted his article from The Courier newspaper and written about him so quit lying.
There was no wine witnessed at the flat on Jimi Hendrix or inside him. 4 men saw Hendrix dead before any doctor did. So that means there was no wine on Hendrix and he wasn’t drowned. These men gave honest testimony before all these bogus wine claims started so they are telling the truth. If they would have seen gallons of wine they would have said it. They only saw vomit cuz that’s all that was there. There was no wine. Just accept the fact that you have no wine claim when these men easily refute you. Your phony wine claim is debunked right from the get go.
BUSTER says: Tony Brown said Monika told him she kept a bottle of wine from the Samarkand…
JASON says: haha still trying to claim wine. Pathetic. You still need 4 more bottles to claim your 5 bottle wine drowning. You came up short by a lot.
Buster: Jimi had an alcohol level of 46mgs in his urine at the autopsy. Tony Brown said that the blood alcohol level was probably 100mgs when he took the Vesparax. You have suggested waterboarding and not drinking the wine as the cause of death which contradicts what the real cause of death actually was. The wine did not cause Jimi’s death but the inhalation of vomit due to the high level of barbiturate ingested did. The ambulance officers witnessed a drugs overdose and not a waterboarding scene at the Samarkand that morning with Jimi clearly dead and not unconscious. The matter surrounding Jimi was black and brown and not red in colour. The was no suctioning done at the hospital on a man who had been dead for hours understood by the doctors present that morning in casualty. Dr. Seifert recalls pounding Jimi’s chest as a mere formality only in order to establish time of death and not in an attempt to resuscitate him. A resuscitation is attempted only if death is immediate and only for a short while and never on someone who had the signs of being dead for a long period of time as Jimi was. Dr. Bannister is clearly responding to allegations of negligence brought against him by Monika by stating that Jimi was worked on in casualty in an attempt to save his life. If that amount of wine was witnessed by any of the personnel then the coroner’s verdict would have differed from the official cause of death and stated on the death certificate.
At the inquest held on September 24, 1970 Gerry Stickells was the first to give evidence, then police sergeant John Shaw and then Professor Teare the pathologist who conducted the autopsy on the 21st September, 1970. He stated “there was about 400ml of free fluid in the left chest, a little free fluid in the right. The left lung was partially collapsed. Both lungs were congested and oedematous and vomited material could be expressed from the smaller bronchi.” He confidently states in his report that the cause of death was inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication and not red wine as insinuated over and over again in these posts. This explanation tallies exactly with what the ambulance and police officers witnessed and not what Dr. Bannister saw and said. Jimi was not brought into casualty in an unconscious state but was dead on arrival as Dr. Brown and Dr. Seifert both said. The high dose of the barbiturate seriously inhibited Jimi’s coughing reflex and he chocked. Any liquid consumed be it wine or water went straight down into Jimi’s lungs. Jimi’s death was not caused by waterboarding with copious amounts of red wine but was a direct result of taking a lethal dose of barbiturates. Jimi was not murdered despite what these hoaxers are reporting here.
The wine hoaxers can only pathetically play word games in order to claim their fake wine drowning. That’s how desperate and fraudulent they are. Real fans of Jimi Hendrix will not allow these frauds to distort and make up accounts that never happened. Hendrix fans will not allow murder trolls to add fake meanings to words John Saua and Reginal Jones never said.
We all know both ambulance men never said the word “Wine” in their testimony with what they witnessed at the flat. But we have a wine hoaxing fraud Buster the wine hoaxer fraudulently trying to claim that the word “vomit” means “wine”. He is a desperate clown since he has no evidence to prove.
“He was covered in vomit. There was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was.” – Reginal Jones Ambulance Man
“I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it.” – John Saua Ambulance Man
Both ambulance men witnessed vomit as they clearly stated. They never said they witnessed a “wine drowning”.
They never said Hendrix was “covered in wine”. This means there was no wine drowning.
They never said they saw wine coming from Hendrix’s mouth or nose. So, there was no 5 bottles of wine inside Hendrix.
Saua saw dry vomit inside Hendrix. Not one drop of wine.
If there was a “wine drowning” Hendrix would have been soaked in wine. The bed would be soaked in wine. Wine would be coming out of Hendrix. These men witnessed no wine on or coming out of Hendrix.
This means there was no wine drowning when no wine was witnessed at the flat.
Wine hoaxers can’t play word games saying “vomit” means wine. No wine was ever witnessed.
Hendrix can’t be magically covered in wine later when he was only covered in vomit at the flat.
Their bogus conspiracy theory has easily been debunked
Jason you would think these professionals would know the difference between wine and vomit. They repeatedly said vomit not wine. The doctors would also be able to tell if someone was unconscious or dead, and when to attempt a resuscitation and when to quit. Like you said Jason, Jimi Hendrix fans are sick and tired of these bogus and concocted scenarios and being lead up the garden path. Jimi was not murdered but died of a lethal dose of barbiturates which caused him to choke; it’s all there in black and white in the death certificate for all to read and in the coroner’s report. Jimi would have lived if he had not swallowed a high dose of Vesparax; the normal dose is half a tablet. These hoaxers first said the wine was ingested and then they said it was all over Jimi implying that he was waterboarded to death by Michael and Monika. This scenario had been discredited and proven to be false therefore if there was no murder then there was no wine. It doesn’t really matter whether Jimi took the pills with wine or with water as the outcome would have been the same given the high dose of the Vesparax.
Hi Ivana,
I think It’s pathetic that we have wine trolls trying to claim that vomit means wine. They know it’s over for them but they try one last desperate attempt to claim wine when none was there.
Reginal Jones and John Saua gave an honest testimony and this was before all these bogus wine claims started. They are telling the truth. They both witnessed many drug overdose calls and recognized Jimi’s was one as well. They both said Hendrix was dead and so did Officer Smith. So, there was no need to rush him to the hospital for procedures. They would only do that if he was still alive. Even Bannister said he was dead. So his phony claims of half hour wine surging resuscitation attempts is contradictory.
Every report I’ve read from 1970 had Hendrix dead on arrival with a resuscitation as a formality and then shipped off to the morgue.
These wine trolls are pathetic distorting the record and making up blatant lies for their phony claims.
Buster the wine hoaxing clown carefully uses language attempting to make himself appear credible. He writes in an authoritative tone pretending to be an “authority”. But when all the smoke clears, you can see he only has excuses and his own opinion of what he believes happened to Hendrix. With that, he then claims to be a “superior authority” after he suppresses the real evidence by claiming everything is a “cover up” and everybody is “lying”. It is very laughable.
In Buster’s phony bag of debating tricks, he tries to claim he is “superior”, which he definitely is not, it is insecurity on his part. When you disagree with his garbage theories, he says “you are denying good evidence” and calls you a troll. The truth is, his “evidence” is crap and anybody with an ounce of common sense laughs at it.
After real evidence refutes his phony claims, he says there is a “cover up”, “Jeffery got to them”, “they all are lying”. That is a joke. He will deny Jimi’s drug overdose by claiming he had “famous tolerance”. That is a bogus personal opinion. He gets by for not having to show evidence of wine by claiming “Bannister dumped it out”. Totally absurd. And then pathetically, Buster deliberately distorts and makes up false claims about what ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones testified to. Buster the clown fraudulently tries to claim the words “vomit” and “pool” means wine so he still can make his phony wine claim. Beyond pathetic. Don’t forget he also accuses Dr. Teare of a “cover up” forging autopsy numbers which is ludicrous.
I know Buster the clown’s phony game better than he does. He is a one trick pony who can only engage using word play in his phony debate style. Buster the clown has no evidence but uses his aggressive debate style to prove his phony theory. He only cares about debating since all the real evidence refutes his phony claims. This is all a debate to him, he doesn’t want it to be about facts or real evidence since he will always lose.
All the readers know his game by now, but his phony game never produces any real evidence. This is why he plays these debate games pretending he is a credible authority. When he becomes cornered, he will attack you, and then will whine and demand that you should be banned. Very weak. Then he claims he is “superior” and you “forfeited the debate”. Phony debating and word games is all Buster the clown has. The reading public doesn’t buy what he claims for one minute. Read all Buster’s words and watch for his phony debate word play. It’s very easy to see. All words full of smoke and mirrors with zero evidence. His sentences are riddled with these tricks. Watch carefully what Buster does.
BUSTER says: Ivana, it was clear long ago that you have no idea what you are talking about and simply offer over-generalized crap that any nay-saying troll who ran across this thread while having a keyboard would offer…You have to be pretty stupid if you think that you represent any credible side to this beyond an internet troll seeking opportunities to deny, or that we should give you any serious consideration.
JASON says: The only troll here is you, who smears and suppresses the real evidence for your phony conspiracy theories. Everybody who reads this page can easily see it. Buster is engaging in word play games pretending to be an authority. He does this in every sentence he writes. The rest of his sentences are more of the same. Heavy on words with zero substance is what he specializes in.
BUSTER says: You two denying trolls have bitten off more than you can chew and any intelligent person who reads this thread can see that you are wandering around in the darkness of your own ignorance hoping one of those idiotically over-generalized comments you make will land a blow…It doesn’t work that way and, as I said before, you can’t respond to superior arguments of evidence with the idiotic crap you do and pretend you are arguing on an equal basis…Every time you have your material shredded like I did in my last post you sink further in to uncredibility and therefore less right to participate…
JASON says: Buster the clown is engaging in more word play games and is pretending to be an “authority”. This is hilarious and pathetic. This is all Buster the clown has in his phony bag of debate tricks. He has nothing else except smoke and mirrors.
You are a joke, and everybody can see that who reads this page. You are a murder wine troll who supresses the real evidence. Your phony argument has been shredded from the beginning. You believed in a fraud liar Tappy Wright. You parroted his claims all along until you learned Jeffery was in Spain and then you changed your tune and your whole story. When you are refuted by evidence, you immediately claim a “cover up” and blame Jeffery. That is weak and pathetic. Your “arguments” are made up fantasy, that only you have the answers to, so you can claim you are “superior authority”. All you can do is attack dead people who can’t defend themselves against your false accusations. Your so called “evidence” is based on unconfirmed accusations and innuendos that you read from books and believe is true. You are a “wannabe researcher Hendrix guru”.
BUSTER says: You and Jason are repeatedly ignoring and refusing to give an answer to the best evidence ever presented on this subject and you do not deserve further airing past that…You both simply see this as getting attention that gives you the excuse for another round of BS replies.
JASON says: We refute your so called “evidence” cuz it’s all made up bullshit. There is no truth to it. Everybody reading this page can see it. The real evidence that Ivana and myself provide, you supress it with your bogus garbage to further your fake conspiracy.
BUSTER says: You or Jason could not show where Flyswatter and myself are making up false scenarios…Our material is based on the best references and sources – which is why you and Jason cannot answer it in public…
JASON says: Hilarious! You are a clown. The majority of my posts show where you lie and make up false scenarios. Your bogus claim of a “hard cork of vomit” is a perfect example. John Saua and Reginal Jones never ever said they witnessed a “hard cork of vomit” inside Hendrix. Also your bullshit claim of “vomit” really means “wine” is fraudulent. Your “evidence” and “sources” comes from fraudulent people like Tappy Wright, Fraud Bannister, and Sharon Lawrence. All these people are liars and Bannister was convicted on 3 counts of fraud losing his medical license, Lawrence committed perjury in court, and Tappy Wright admitted he lied to sell books. These are your phony sources Buster, and you still have no idea why people laugh and ignore the garbage you peddle. Bogus sources is not the “best references and sources” as you ridiculously claim.
BUSTER says: If you knew anything about this case you would know your phony taking offense over Stickells is laughable because he was deep in to it and knew a lot more than he told…He lied to Tony Brown when he told him Terry Slater called between 8 and 9am and failed to mention the Samarkand as being the location where Jimi was “having trouble at the hotel”…Any fool can see that wording used by Stickells was deliberately designed to get Stickells off the legal follow-through the persons who fabricated that phrase knew would come…Stickells lied and obviously tried to make an excuse for his not knowing about the Samarkand that was only two blocks from his own flat…Any fool can see he was trying too hard to convince the Inquest he had no idea about the Samarkand…We know Stickells was lying because we know Mitch Mitchell got pulled in to the same lie when he spoke about trying to call Jimi from Stickells’ flat the evening Jimi died…Mitch lied and said he called the Cumberland hotel…Only a fool would avoid imagining that Mitch went to the Samarkand but Monika and Jimi had gone to Harvey’s by that time so Mitch went right around the block to Gerry’s to ring them up…In any case Ivana (who is obviously way over her head in criminal detection on this subject) moronically ignores that we know Jimi was dead at 5:30am – so Stickells is lying if he says Slater rang him at 9 and only said Jimi was in trouble when we know Jimi was stone dead for several hours by that time…It never troubles Ivana’s dull brow that Monika said she woke up a little after 10am to the Inquest or that Stickells locked himself in to a lie when he told Tony Brown that Slater called him between 8 and 9am…Because Ivana’s purpose is to just nay-say anything she sees she never troubles herself to realize we have proof the authorities were corrupted because they had this information about this fatal conflict in their possession and did not act upon it…Just look at Ivana’s moronic treatment of this vs mine…
JASON says: Trying to blame Stickells doesn’t make red wine appear that the flat that not one human witnessed being on Jimi Hendrix or on the bed. You are also engaging in more word play games pretending to be an authority using your own personal opinions. What you are blathering about is not credible evidence and is only second hand information that you read in a book. Unless you have red wine on Hendrix and on the bed you have no case. The ambulance men saw no wine on Hendrix or on the bed in the flat. You have no case so you debate insignificant nonsense instead.
BUSTER says: Your statement that I refuse to accept that Jimi’s death wasn’t alcohol related is deliberately dishonest…Anyone can read my response to your previously saying that and see you are dishonestly using disqualifyingly overly-general semantics to get around answering what I told you in my last post…Your wording is inherently deceptive because anyone who reads “alcohol-related” would think it involved consumed alcohol and a drug conflict chemical reaction…You are lying here Ivana because you know as well as I that I am saying there was no significant consumed alcohol and that the “alcohol” involved was forced wine that drowned Jimi physically…Your answer conspicuously avoids recognizing that or honestly answering it so you are therefore showing the public dishonest intent…If I were moderator I would ban you for it…
JASON says: You are a coward Buster, that’s why you would ban Ivana and me. You can’t defend your phony claims and you want the real evidence suppressed. You want to ban and censor people who expose your phony claims. That is weak.
Here you whine about being banned in various forums, but you want to ban people who disagree with you. You are a hypocrite. There is no evidence that Hendrix was “forced drowned”. Nothing in the autopsy by Teare showed any “forced wine drowning”. But then you lie claiming Jeffery “covered it all up” and claim your phony victory. Like I said, your phony claims are a joke and everybody reading can see it.
BUSTER says: It is also incredibly stupid to project nobility on to the rock industry…People in the know will tell you it was extremely corrupt and persons like Jeffery and their perfidy were quite common…So saying noble industry insiders would reject Stickells because of the scandal of Jimi’s murder is laughable considering the real truth is his ability to lie and preserve large sums of money for the murderers is what made him desirable.
JASON says: It is well known that managers took most of the money from their clients, moron. Jeffery took 40% of Jimi’s earnings that was legally documented in his contract. Managers weren’t out “murdering” their clients like the bogus claims you make. Jeffery had no motive to kill Jimi. He wasn’t fired and the contract ran for two and a half more years. You are a clown who pretends to be an “authority”.
Hi Jason. Fabulous work here Jason. I’ve answered below to Buster’s usual long winded rants full of rhetoric and wind but not much else. Have you noticed the longer he posts the longer the list of suspects becomes. I think we have really struck a cord here because Buster is using his usual derogatory language to silence his opponents. We would never fall for any of his bogus claims.
Thanks Ivana.
Yeah, these wine trolls are desperate since they lost their phony wine claim. They are working really hard to find any bogus claim of wine which is hilarious. Now they use Doctor Bob Brown for their phony theory.
The two wine trolls have a hard time trying to claim “wine” when no wine was witnessed at the flat by Reginal Jones and John Saua. Also, Officer Smith saw no wine drowning at the flat either.
“But Bob Brown….” the wine trolls whine. Bob Brown made his comment 20 years after John Saua and Reginal Jones gave their testimony. Also, common sense tells you, when 4 men witnessed Hendrix dead at a flat first before any doctor saw him with no wine on his body or coming out of him, then you can’t have wine on his body or inside him later. Also, these wine trolls are exaggerating what Brown said.
The bottom line is these two wine trolls claimed a massive Hendrix wine drowning scene with gallons of wine all over the place and spilling out of Hendrix’s mouth and nose to full capacity. But to their own folly, we have two ambulance men, two police officers, and two coroner’s officers who saw no wine drowning scene at the flat. We have two ambulance men and two police officers who saw no wine on Hendrix’s body or coming out of him.
Wine trolls can’t claim a “wine drowning” when 4 men saw no wine before any doctor did at the hospital. Where did all this magic wine come from? It sure wasn’t at the flat on or in Hendrix when he was dead. It certainly can’t magically appear later.
We know Hendrix drank wine all that evening so that’s what was registered in the autopsy not a bogus wine drowning of 5 bottles of wine. 9 Vesparax mixed with a powerful amphetamine plus wine from Harvey’s and Kameron’s is what killed Jimi.
Remember kids, vomit does not mean wine and you can’t invent wine that doesn’t exist.
When 4 men witness no wine present at the death scene, wine hoaxers don’t get to claim a wine drowning.
Sorry wine hoaxers.
When trapped by the evidence he is ignoring Jason turns up the bluster…Anyone who is familiar with this case can see Jason is an attention-seeking troll who has very little knowledge of the subject…He’s obviously a dark web internet troll who stumbled across the threads and has no knowledge of the topic and is learning as he goes so he can pretend to be offering an informed opinion…He’s obviously just offering any nay-saying idiocy he can invent as he types and isn’t to be taken seriously…His purpose is to destroy the previous sanctuary of high quality information this comments section was, before he and his trolling partner Ivana showed up, by clogging the site with annoying BS like he entered in his last post which lowers the conversation to the straight name-calling level such trolls seek to reduce it to…
Jason obviously doesn’t read his own material because if he did he would realize Devon said in her phone call to Buzzy that Jimi had a high tolerance and had to take extra…Devon would know because she was close to Jimi at the drug-taking level…Jason had said I was making up Jimi’s tolerance and had no proof for it like he says to everything…The dumb-ass didn’t realize he himself posted proof for it in Devon’s quote…Jimi’s high tolerance for barbiturates was shown in Denmark a few weeks before his murder where he took a hand full of pills and washed it down with a pint of whiskey…The witnesses said Jimi got spacey but did not pass-out in that event…I already mentioned this before but with the demented troll Jason he ignores it and makes the same stupid and disproven claims over and over despite already having been informed…
In any case the long blathering, trolling, name-calling-based responses Jason is making, because he got the attention he was seeking, still haven’t answered the points Flyswatter asked Jason to answer…That is their purpose…To filibuster the thread by filling it with denial rhetoric speeches that are designed seize the narrative for the purpose of avoiding answering the evidence Jason is clearly unable to answer…Jason has already lost this debate because the lying troll refuses to give a direct or honest answer to the wine evidence he is in open, demented, trolling denial of…Flyswatter pointed-out that Dr Bob Brown mentioned that Jimi had too much to drink when he witnessed him being wheeled in to the hospital on a gurney…There is only one possible explanation that Jason is well aware of…That Brown detected the same wine that Siefert and Bannister mentioned…Simple deductive reasoning and common sense dictate that for Brown, Bannister, and Siefert to all detect wine on Jimi at St Mary’s means that the wine had to be even more detectable at the Samarkand where it originated…So no reasonably sane or credible person can say there was no wine witnessed at the Samarkand…Any sensible person reading this thread can see Jason is making a totally dishonest and trolling effort to force disingenuous semantics by implying the mention of “vomit” at the Samarkand by the emergency personnel equates to no wine…This is proven by the fact Jason refuses to answer the point about Bob Brown even though he has been asked to answer it directly a dozen times now…He knows it is proof and that’s why he trolls harder and refuses to answer it in public…And I’m still waiting for him to answer Dr Teare’s 100mg blood alcohol content estimation…
Also Dr Thurston witnessed the wine by saying “From his stomach contents at his autopsy it was obvious Mr Hendrix had imbibed a large amount of red wine”…Dr Thurston was the Chief Coroner at the London Coroner’s Office so Jason is just in demented outright denial…He’s just an unbanned troll at this point and ignorable…
More fun from the wine troll clown Buster, still desperately flailing away looking for any excuse to find imaginary wine in a feeble attempt to claim his phony wine theory.
What these two wine clowns don’t understand is, all the nonsense they try to parrot is useless since no wine was ever witnessed at the flat by Reginal Jones and John Saua along with Officer Ian Smith on the bedding or on Hendrix. Any garbage they post is useless, since no wine was witnessed at the Hendrix death scene by these expert witnesses.
Let’s have a few more laughs at a desperate wine troll.
BUSTER says: When trapped by the evidence he is ignoring Jason turns up the bluster…Anyone who is familiar with this case can see Jason is an attention-seeking troll who has very little knowledge of the subject…He’s obviously a dark web internet troll who stumbled across the threads and has no knowledge of the topic and is learning as he goes so he can pretend to be offering an informed opinion…He’s obviously just offering any nay-saying idiocy he can invent as he types and isn’t to be taken seriously…His purpose is to destroy the previous sanctuary of high quality information this comments section was, before he and his trolling partner Ivana showed up, by clogging the site with annoying BS like he entered in his last post which lowers the conversation to the straight name-calling level such trolls seek to reduce it to…
JASON says: Funny that you call me a “troll” when I’ve refuted everything you’ve attempted to post. That makes you really angry. All you do is parrot the same bogus conspiracy claims you read from a tabloid book and your personal opinion over and over. I’m posting high quality information from accurate news sources that shows real evidence of Jimi’s death. You post garbage from Tappy Wright, Sharon Lawrence, and Fraud Bannister claiming that’s high quality. That is a joke. Everybody reading can see that.
Buster the wine hoaxer and his sidekick court jester “swatter” have no evidence. There is no evidence of a “wine drowning” at the flat. So, they distort the record and make up garbage. We all can see that.
The only ones trapped here is you and your trolling wine hoaxing sidekick. You both made phony claims of a “wine drowning” and now you have no wine witnessed by Reginal Jones and John Saua and Officer Ian Smith at the flat to claim a “wine drowning”. Your constant ramblings pretending to be an “authority” is getting old. All the readers can see you are a phony just like your phony wine claims.
BUSTER says:Jason obviously doesn’t read his own material because if he did he would realize Devon said in her phone call to Buzzy that Jimi had a high tolerance and had to take extra…Devon would know because she was close to Jimi at the drug-taking level…Jason had said I was making up Jimi’s tolerance and had no proof for it like he says to everything…The dumb-ass didn’t realize he himself posted proof for it in Devon’s quote…Jimi’s high tolerance for barbiturates was shown in Denmark a few weeks before his murder where he took a hand full of pills and washed it down with a pint of whiskey…The witnesses said Jimi got spacey but did not pass-out in that event…I already mentioned this before but with the demented troll Jason he ignores it and makes the same stupid and disproven claims over and over despite already having been informed…
JASON says: Buster the wine clown is parroting a false claim of a “high tolerance” of drugs again. Jimi mixed 9 Vesparax tablets with a powerful amphetamine which killed him. Buster the wine clown still desperately tries to make phony claims that drugs didn’t kill Jimi. All the forensic analysis and witnessing at the flat by ambulance and police men proves that it did. Buster the wine hoaxing clown religiously parrots the fake “high tolerance of drugs” claim so he can supress the real evidence so he can claim wine. Well, our hoaxing wine troll has a problem, cuz no expert witness witnessed any gallons of wine on Jimi Hendrix’s body, on the bed, or inside him. There was no wine, it was the drugs that killed Hendrix.
BUSTER says: In any case the long blathering, trolling, name-calling-based responses Jason is making, because he got the attention he was seeking, still haven’t answered the points Flyswatter asked Jason to answer…That is their purpose…To filibuster the thread by filling it with denial rhetoric speeches that are designed seize the narrative for the purpose of avoiding answering the evidence Jason is clearly unable to answer…Jason has already lost this debate because the lying troll refuses to give a direct or honest answer to the wine evidence he is in open, demented, trolling denial of…Flyswatter pointed-out that Dr Bob Brown mentioned that Jimi had too much to drink when he witnessed him being wheeled in to the hospital on a gurney…There is only one possible explanation that Jason is well aware of…That Brown detected the same wine that Siefert and Bannister mentioned…Simple deductive reasoning and common sense dictate that for Brown, Bannister, and Siefert to all detect wine on Jimi at St Mary’s means that the wine had to be even more detectable at the Samarkand where it originated…So no reasonably sane or credible person can say there was no wine witnessed at the Samarkand…Any sensible person reading this thread can see Jason is making a totally dishonest and trolling effort to force disingenuous semantics by implying the mention of “vomit” at the Samarkand by the emergency personnel equates to no wine…This is proven by the fact Jason refuses to answer the point about Bob Brown even though he has been asked to answer it directly a dozen times now…He knows it is proof and that’s why he trolls harder and refuses to answer it in public…And I’m still waiting for him to answer Dr Teare’s 100mg blood alcohol content estimation…
JASON says: Same old garbage regurgitated over and over. Every reader knows your nonsense word for word by now. Same old phony debating style with your usual tricks. You should just copy and paste your bloated paragraphs and save your fingers from typing. Flyswatter is a bigger wine clown than you are.
Obviously, you have a reading comprehension problem as well, cuz I’ve already answered about Bob Brown on this site. Not sure why you continue to lie claiming “I refuse to answer it in public”. I’ve posted an article on Bob Brown and wrote about him last month. Why can’t you see that? Funny how you keep talking about Bob Brown.
Bob Brown never said “Jimi had too much to drink”. Bob Brown said “Jimi had a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. You’re taking his words out of context. Bob Brown also never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix’s body and he was right next to him when he was wheeled in already dead.
There was no wine witnessed at the flat by Reginal Jones and John Saua along with Officer Ian Smith. This makes any claims after that irrelevant and not credible. You can’t have wine appear after the fact when no wine was witnessed first at the death scene by expert witnesses. This is why you will always and forever lose your phony wine claim.
Buster the wine clown matches up the fake “5 bottles of wine ” claim by Bannister with Teare’s autopsy numbers and claims it’s a murder and the numbers don’t add up Moron!
BUSTER says: Also Dr Thurston witnessed the wine by saying “From his stomach contents at his autopsy it was obvious Mr Hendrix had imbibed a large amount of red wine”…Dr Thurston was the Chief Coroner at the London Coroner’s Office so Jason is just in demented outright denial…He’s just an unbanned troll at this point and ignorable…
JASON says: You are a wine troll who has lost your phony wine claim. No, I’m not going to be banned cuz you demand it. You are being a coward who can’t answer for your phony wine claims. That makes you angry so you want me to be silenced instead. Well, that’s too bad. I can post here as well and I will continue to.
Dr. Thurston witnessed no wine ‘imbibed’ in Jimi Hendrix since there was no wine witnessed at the flat by the ambulance men. Dr. Teare found no large amounts of wine in Hendrix and Bannister did not suction any wine and dump it out. The ambulance men saw no wine at all. Thurston saw no wine either.
Buster the wine Hoaxer is parroting a fake quote from Sharon Lawrence who wrote that quote in her fantasy book. What Sharon Lawrence claims is not credible since
Thurston is not on the record being quoted. It’s a bogus second hand claim by Sharon Lawrence. Thurston wrote nothing about ‘imbibed wine’ in his report. I’ve already covered extensively in my “Debunking the phony imbibed wine myth” 3 Part Series. Buster keeps parroting this fake quote that is made up fiction.
No wine witnessed at the flat means no wine at all. That also means no ‘imbibed wine’. That’s the end of the story. Deal with it.
Ivana: You give your dishonesty and ignorance of the subject away in your writing…Tony Brown did not say Jimi had a blood alcohol content of 100mg…Brown was quoting Dr Teare who made a special entry on the autopsy saying he was “estimating” a 100mg blood alcohol content at the time Jimi took the pills…You are dishonestly trimming the information for the purpose of dishonest spin…You have already been informed that Teare violated medical law by making that estimate…You can’t guess in an autopsy like that…The fact Teare based that estimate on Moinka’s timeline that was proven to be lies shows why it is against medical law to estimate…If you were more honest you would admit that the reason Dr Teare estimated was because he realized the trace blood alcohol amount he detected was far too low for the assumed cause of death and conflicted with the wine Dr Thurston spoke of…Seeing that the blood alcohol content was unexplainably low Dr Teare tried to compensate by boosting it with a guess…A guess based on Monika’s false timeline that was 6 hours off…That right there tells you Dr Teare knew there was something wrong and tried to adjust for it…What his medical duty required him to do was address what that trace blood alcohol content told him and pursue it forensically…Teare did the opposite of what he was supposed to do and broke medical law in the process…I know that is fine with you two assholes but in the real world it is illegal and proof of a crime at the official level…
The 46mg urine alcohol level is credible because it was measured…We know Jimi had some wine at Harvey’s that evening and possibly had a small amount at Kameron’s…The story from Kameron’s is Devon went out to look for some drugs because the only thing at the party was booze…So I assume Jimi’s booze consumption at Kameron’s was minimal to none…Any credible serious analysis of this event will try to determine how much wine Jimi drank that night, when, and where…It will also try to determine exactly when Jimi took the Vesparax and how long they were inside him…Jason and Ivana stay away from this last item because they know it works against them…The question then is if Jimi had 46mg in his urine then how much was in his blood when he took the Vesparax?…
Because Ivana and Jason deal with this at a highly unintelligent level they don’t reflect the fact the product manufacturer said peak saturation levels of the drug can be reached in as little as an hour after ingestion of Vesparax…That means the liver and blood barbiturate levels seen at Jimi’s autopsy could have been reached in as little as an hour after Jimi took the pills…Which means Jimi could have taken the pills as late as 4:30am and died at 5:30am and only had the pills in him for an hour…So that means if Jimi had not urinated for a while and the alcohol in his urine was digested alcohol from hours earlier the urine alcohol is not very meaningful as far as forensic pathology…We would obviously need consultation on this on the digestion rates of alcohol in the body and its ensuing blood level…
I’m sure Ivana is too stupid to understand this so it is hopeless that I will get any intelligent or honest response to this, however what we are talking about is what blood alcohol amount would be in Jimi from extrapolating normal alcohol digestion rates that back track from 5mg?…We know Jimi died with a trace 5mg blood alcohol content…We therefore have to find out what blood alcohol amounts would be in Jimi 1 hour earlier and 2 hours earlier and relate it to the 46mg urine alcohol content…I have no training in forensic pathology yet I realize this…So Dr Teare has no excuse for not doing this because this is what he should have done but broke the law instead with his “estimate”…It is also what the criminal piece of shit Dr Hunter should have done on the phony CIA hit piece ‘Autopsy’ program…
Oh, by the way Ivana…You never answered what Dr Brown was referring to when he said Jimi had obviously had too much to drink?…Any possibility it was the wine Bannister and Siefert mentioned?…
Buster. What exactly is it about this story you’re not understanding. Jimi died of the barbiturate level whether there was wine present in his system or not; the wine is irrelevant in this story. Did the autopsy reveal wine or the barbiturate as the cause of death. Like Jason and I have repeatedly said the ambulance officers witnessed many overdoses at the time and Jimi’s was no different. You have decided to ignore the evidence of the highly skilled and experienced professionals and go with your own. It was very clear to these people what caused Jimi’s death and it had nothing to do with the wine. You have clung to this murder scenario for decades for whatever reason even though it has been revealed to be a fabrication preferring it over the real cause of death. If the doctors, ambulance officers or police officers suspected foul play or witnessed anything suspicious they would have raised the alarm and had this investigated further. As I have said numerous times
If it was murder by waterboarding the autopsy would have revealed this pure and simple. The coroner’s findings revealed that Jimi died of the barbiturate level and not the wine. If Jimi was saturated in wine then the death certificate would have stated this and the autopsy results would have differed from the original cause of death. Jason and I have understood many things that you have failed to grasp in this story. Kathy had this investigated thoroughly yet she does not buy into these claims of murder by Michael Jeffrey because it never happened. All the people you have sided with Buster have been discredited for one reason or another but you still enjoy their company because you have bought into their claims and are still clinging to them. The truth is quite simple to comprehend but you have and will always go with the worst case scenario because it tallies with you suspicious mindset-there is always more to this story than meets the eye. Give it up Buster you’re making a fool of yourself.
You are not explaining anything to me Ivana…It is clear from your responses that you are too stupid to understand or respond to the evidence I discussed in my last post…Your idiotic, overly-general replies are just straight denial trolling designed to avoid answering the specifics of my last post…I’m not going to get sucked in to them or rise to the bait…
I have already explained on a highly competent, credible basis why it would be impossible for Jimi to die from 9 Vesparax in only 1 or 2 hours while having a known tolerance…You are trolling something that I have already proven false and seeking a reaction to it from me…The doctors Monika hired said Jimi did not die from the Vesparax…You can go re-read the barbiturate forensics I already posted…I am not going to waste any further time posting them again since you are obviously ignoring them and not interested in the true evidence…
You are also lying because you know that the wine was not available to the autopsy because it had been removed at hospital 3 days before the autopsy so therefore it could not be detected at the autopsy…You already know this yet you ignore it and keep asking why the wine wasn’t detected at the autopsy…That makes you a liar and I don’t argue with demented liars…
You’re lying Ivana because the amount of vomit on Jimi was remarkable and showed he wasn’t well in to an overdose that would have paralyzed his nervous system…You’re lying because that amount of vomit was not normal for overdose choking on vomit cases…That reaction cannot happen to a person with a tolerance in only 1 or 2 hours from 9 Vesparax…
The rest of your post is moronic and ignores the intelligent true history of covert government murders and cover-ups…We have correctly cited the evidence for a such a corruption in the investigation (or should I say non-investigation) in to Jimi’s death…You’re obviously ignoring it so there’s no point in discussing anything with you….
Since you are offering idiotic level trolling in response to the best evidence I will go back to ignoring you…
Too stupid. Here we go again with your tin foil hatter plots and theories none of them based on fact but the ramblings of a delusional mind responding to logic and reason with more delusional ramblings. You show all traits of a demented liar with you supposed covert government murders and cover-ups. Your suppositions are just that disguised as fact and evidence which of course it is neither. The doctors would not have cleaned or tampered with Jimi’s body in any way before it was handed over to the coroner for the autopsy. The fact that the coroner determined cause of death after examining Jimi’s body is testimony to this. But once again you ignore the work of the professionals and their findings and include your own distorted opinions on the matter. I have never heard that Monika hired her own doctors in this story where did you get this ludicrous piece of information from? Do everyone a favour and stop setting yourself up as a professional in this matter and trying to be something you are not in this story.
Hey Ivana — ya ugly old wart. Is that your head or did someone crap on your shoulders?
You are quite correct about yourself — and you only — being “Too stupid”.
You’ve shown everybody, with your moronic posts, that you’re too stupid to connect the dots in a straight line when it comes to the Jimi Hendrix death case.
Instead you go about it in the manner of sticking one finger in your mouth, and then finger in yours ass, and rotating those fingers whenever you hear a bird chirp, and trying to walk on your elbows — all in the same given moment (hence why Scott Thompson originally called you out).
The stupidity is clearly on your side only & has been that way ever since you started posting
Hey Buster, get a load of this….
Ivana says “The doctors would not have cleaned or tampered with Jimi’s body in any way before it was handed over to the coroner for the autopsy”.
What total load of bullshit. Both Siefert and Bannister stated that they did work on him. It was pointed out already the time frame was from 11:45AM (the time Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots) to 12:15PM (the time the doctors quit working on Jimi and declared him dead), and this was printed in Mitch Mitchell’s book published in 1990, and they most likely got that info from the hospital report.
The coroner’s form stated on it “Unable to Resuscitate”. Anybody can go to You Tube and watch the video “The Last 24 Hours” and if they watch closely, then they will see that the coroner’s form does indeed say “Unable to Resuscitate”.
If Ivana’s BS claim of “The doctors would not have cleaned or tampered with Jimi’s body in any way before it was handed over to the coroner for the autopsy” were true, then Jimi would have been declared dead much sooner than 12:15PM.
Just another example of Ivana pulling self-decreed fabrications out of her ass.
Jason Wrote: ” Also, common sense tells you, when 4 men witnessed Hendrix dead at a flat first before any doctor saw him with no wine on his body or coming out of him, then you can’t have wine on his body or inside him later. Also, these wine trolls are exaggerating what Brown said. ”
Jason is a liar…If you read Sharon Lawrence’s book ‘Jimi Hendrix: The Intimate Story Of A Betrayed Musical Legend’ Sharon was the first person to confront Monika on the wine…Monika had never been directly asked about the wine…Monika’s reaction to the question was to make a painful moan in to the telephone for 20 seconds and then tell Lawrence “I used wine to wash sick off Jimi’s face”…Jason thinks his trolling controls reality and if he doesn’t mention Monika’s admission that she poured wine on Jimi’s face then it doesn’t exist and he can make his intentionally-dishonest claims freely without worrying…Jason thinks he’s clever but he’s just an unstudied idiot making a fool of himself, just like Caesar Glebbeek, by leaving out major chunks of important witnessing…Monika Dannemann is the number one witness because she was there at the Samarkand when Jimi died…She told Sharon Lawrence that she washed sick off Jimi’s face with wine because Sharon had asked her directly how so much wine got on Jimi…She even asked why it was in his mouth…
Jason must think people are pretty stupid to think he can get away with ignoring this or its implications…The reason Sharon asked Monika that question less than a year before Monika’s death is obviously because Sharon had looked at her notes and saw Jack Meehan’s interview with Gavin Thurston where Thurston said Jimi’s stomach had a large amount of red wine in it…Also, by the time of that 1995 phone call from Monika, Sharon had also heard of Dr Bannister’s letter to Shapiro where he detailed the 5 bottles of wine he removed from Jimi’s body…That wine was the same wine Dr Siefert was referring to when he said “Jimi was covered in red wine”…Monika’s admission proves beyond a doubt that the “vomit” being referred to by the ambulance men was vomit that had to contain a high percentage of wine…When Sharon confronted Monika about Jimi being soaked in wine Monika did not deny it…
Jason is a liar because anyone with an IQ above room temperature whose sole purpose isn’t nay-saying all the evidence for Jimi’s murder, like Jason, would know that Monika did not really wash Jimi’s face with wine…No person would select wine to wash a person’s face with when they had warm water, soap, and a hand towel just as close by in the small flat…Monika was obviously making up a quick excuse to Sharon, that it took her 20 seconds to think of while moaning in to the receiver…We know Monika did not wash vomit off Jimi’s face with wine because in other statements the ambulance men said Jimi’s face was covered in vomit…The death scene showed a Hendrix that no one had done any cleaning on or tried to help…Monika was obviously lying because she knew damned-well what the wine had been used for because she was probably standing right there the whole time…
No wine at the Samarkand, huh Jason?…
It is silly to say Dr Siefert and Dr Brown could detect wine on Jimi but it would then be canceled out at the Samarkand because nobody used the exact word “wine” when describing the Samarkand death scene…That’s as silly as it is dishonest…
Jason clearly exposes his stupidity with his statement of ” these wine trolls are exaggerating what Brown said”.
That’s pure BS. It has been asked repeatedly asked “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink?”. Jason’s desperation is clearly being shown here, as that merely constitutes a question that Jason can’t answer, so the only recourse is for Jason to rip things out of context and refer to it as “exaggerating”
Buster the wine hoaxer is desperate enough to use Sharon Lawrence of all people parroting more of her phony claims.
What Buster the wine Hoaxer doesn’t understand, is that the expert witness testimony of John Saua and Reginal Jones refutes all these other claims since they never witnessed a “wine drowning” at the death scene. These wine trolls can type away forever saying “so and so said this”, that still will never produce a “wine drowning” scene that Reginal Jones and John Saua never witnessed.
BUSTER says: Jason is a liar…If you read Sharon Lawrence’s book ‘Jimi Hendrix: The Intimate Story Of A Betrayed Musical Legend’ Sharon was the first person to confront Monika on the wine…Monika had never been directly asked about the wine…Monika’s reaction to the question was to make a painful moan in to the telephone for 20 seconds and then tell Lawrence “I used wine to wash sick off Jimi’s face”…Jason thinks his trolling controls reality and if he doesn’t mention Monika’s admission that she poured wine on Jimi’s face then it doesn’t exist and he can make his intentionally-dishonest claims freely without worrying…Jason thinks he’s clever but he’s just an unstudied idiot making a fool of himself, just like Caesar Glebbeek, by leaving out major chunks of important witnessing…Monika Dannemann is the number one witness because she was there at the Samarkand when Jimi died…She told Sharon Lawrence that she washed sick off Jimi’s face with wine because Sharon had asked her directly how so much wine got on Jimi…She even asked why it was in his mouth…
JASON says: The only liar here is Buster the wine hoaxing clown desperately looking for any excuse to claim wine. Now he believes Monika Dannemann again. This is hilarious.
Sharon Lawrence said in her book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide with pills. So is Buster the clown going to believe that too?
Buster is only reduced to claiming quotes about “so and so said this” out of a tabloid book.
Well, ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones said they witnessed only brown vomit on Jimi Hendrix. They never mentioned the “red wine” that these wine hoaxing clowns claim.
They both witnessed dry vomit inside Hendrix. They never mentioned witnessing wine. Their credible testimony refutes all the claims of what these “authors” write. Jones and Saua were there to witness the death scene themselves. These “authors” were not, so their claims are not credible.
Buster the clown and his wine hoaxing sidekick “swatter” claimed that Hendrix was soaked in gallons of red wine and he was flooded with wine spilling out of his mouth.
They also claimed the bedding was soaked in gallons of wine. John Saua and
Reginal Jones never witnessed a scene like this.
The ambulance men witnessed no wine covering the bed, Hendrix’s body, or coming out of him. The wine hoaxers lose their phony wine claim on their testimony. The hoaxers still look for pathetic excuses to still claim wine. One wine bottle at the flat doesn’t equate to the several bottles they claim killed Hendrix. They look really stupid for attempting to claim that. Expert witness testimony refutes all these other claims made by outsiders and fraudsters.
BUSTER says: Jason must think people are pretty stupid to think he can get away with ignoring this or its implications…The reason Sharon asked Monika that question less than a year before Monika’s death is obviously because Sharon had looked at her notes and saw Jack Meehan’s interview with Gavin Thurston where Thurston said Jimi’s stomach had a large amount of red wine in it…Also, by the time of that 1995 phone call from Monika, Sharon had also heard of Dr Bannister’s letter to Shapiro where he detailed the 5 bottles of wine he removed from Jimi’s body…That wine was the same wine Dr Siefert was referring to when he said “Jimi was covered in red wine”…Monika’s admission proves beyond a doubt that the “vomit” being referred to by the ambulance men was vomit that had to contain a high percentage of wine…When Sharon confronted Monika about Jimi being soaked in wine Monika did not deny it…
JASON says: Here we go again with the same old claims that have already been debunked. Here we go with Thurston again and the imaginary 5 bottles of wine.
John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed “5 bottles of wine” drowning Hendrix at the flat. So where do these imaginary 5 bottles of wine come from?
Buster the wine hoxer can no longer claim 5 bottles of wine since it was never witnessed at the Hendrix death scene.
There never was a Jack Meehan and Thurston interview discussing ‘imbibed wine’. Sharon Lawrence made this fake quote up for her fantasy book just like she said Jimi committed suicide with pills and that Jimi was born at a family friend’s house. None of that is true.
There was no ‘imbibed wine’ since there was no wine on Hendrix at the flat witnessed by experts. This makes all after the fact wine claims inaccurate. Hendrix had no wine at the flat as witnessed by medical professionals and police men. Hendrix can’t have wine magically appear later on.
All these phony after the fact wine claims don’t work. The wine hoaxing trolls can’t seem to understand that.
Finally, we still see Buster the wine hoaxer still trying to say that “brown vomit” means “red wine”. This desperate wine troll will never give up the fact he lost his phony wine claim.
BUSTER says: Jason is a liar because anyone with an IQ above room temperature whose sole purpose isn’t nay-saying all the evidence for Jimi’s murder, like Jason, would know that Monika did not really wash Jimi’s face with wine…No person would select wine to wash a person’s face with when they had warm water, soap, and a hand towel just as close by in the small flat…Monika was obviously making up a quick excuse to Sharon, that it took her 20 seconds to think of while moaning in to the receiver…We know Monika did not wash vomit off Jimi’s face with wine because in other statements the ambulance men said Jimi’s face was covered in vomit…The death scene showed a Hendrix that no one had done any cleaning on or tried to help…Monika was obviously lying because she knew damned-well what the wine had been used for because she was probably standing right there the whole time…
JASON says: What Buster the wine hoaxer is typing is not evidence. It’s what he read from a tabloid book. It’s also his own personal theory of what he is trying to spin to still claim wine. A single bottle of wine at the flat, is not the several bottles of wine these wine hoaxers claim drowned Hendrix. They are still several bottles short. So, in Buster’s desperate and pathetic attempt to establish wine at the flat, Buster the clown rambles on nonsensically about a bottle of wine that everybody knows was already there.
BUSTER says: No wine at the Samarkand, huh Jason?…
JASON: You are still several bottles short to claim your fake wine drowning. Expert witnesses who were at the flat never witnessed a wine drowning scene as you and your hoaxing pal claim. Hilarious how desperate you are to claim wine. First you claimed “many bottles” and now you only talk about one. Not much of a “wine drowning” eh?
BUSTER says: It is silly to say Dr Siefert and Dr Brown could detect wine on Jimi but it would then be canceled out at the Samarkand because nobody used the exact word “wine” when describing the Samarkand death scene…That’s as silly as it is dishonest…
JASON: What’s silly is a desperate wine troll like yourself, still trying to claim wine when gallons of wine was not witnessed at the death scene. If there was a wine drowning as you claim, all the men at the flat would have clearly stated wine. No man there witnessed a wine drowning. They only said vomit. Vomit is not wine. Also, Bob Brown never “detected” wine on Jimi. You are dishonest for making up lies and taking what people say deliberately out of context.
I’ve said all along that real expert witness testimony refutes phony claims every single time. We have a perfect example of this right here.
John Saua and Reginal Jones gave a real honest and truthful testimony about what they witnessed at the flat. They clearly stated that they witnessed only vomit and never mentioned the word wine in their testimony.
This angers the wine trolls since it destroys their phony wine hoax.
The wine hoaxers desperately try to use anything they can to claim wine. They pathetically try to say that “vomit” means “wine”. Everybody laughs at that nonsense. Then they claim a “pool” is “wine”. Everybody laughs even harder at their pathetic desperation.
Then they whine and say there was “already wine at the flat”. Yes, we know that, but that’s not the “many bottles” of wine they claim drowned Hendrix. There is no evidence of all those “many bottles” of wine since not one ambulance man, police man, coroner’s officer witnessed a wine drowning scene at the flat.
Then they whine even more and say “but Bob Brown said…..”. The wine hoaxers are taking what Bob Brown said out of context. He never said “Hendrix was drowned in wine”.
Also, John Saua, Reginal Jones, and Officer Smith never witnessed Hendrix “covered in wine” or witnessed any wine coming out of his mouth or nose in a “wine drowning”. Their expert witness testimony refutes anything a doctor tries to claim. Jones, Saua, Smith witnessed Hendrix first before any doctor did. They witnessed the actual death scene. They examined Hendrix first before any doctor did. They all witnessed no wine on Hendrix at the flat. They gave their testimony to Kathy Etchingham before all these bogus wine claims started. So, their testimony refutes whatever any doctor claims since they witnessed Hendrix dead first and saw no wine anywhere on him or inside him. You can’t have a dead Hendrix at the flat with no wine on him and then magically have wine appear later. Real life doesn’t work that way.
Then the wine trolls start to parrot the nonsense they read from their tabloid books. They start sniveling, “Sharon Lawrence said this”, “Brown said that”, “Henderson told me that”. Like I said before, real witness testimony refutes these phony claims every single time. The ambulance men were there in person to witness the death scene. These “authors” who are trying to sell books were not, and are only printing claims or whatever hooks will get gullible people to buy their book. These people are not credible especially Sharon Lawrence who claimed Jimi Hendrix committed suicide and made up fake quotes and stories in her book. Who can believe what she says? We have real testimony that refutes whatever they or wine trolls claim.
It doesn’t matter which absurd claim or word play game these wine trolls attempt to use to convince themselves or the reading public that there was a “wine drowning “. We have honest truthful credible testimony coming from two ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua who witnessed Hendrix dead at the death scene before anybody else at the hospital saw him. These two men witnessed no wine on Jimi Hendrix. They witnessed no wine on the bed or pillows. They witnessed no wine inside Hendrix. If there was a “wine drowning”, they would have witnessed it and testified to it. Both men saw no such scene. They never any wine that morning. We also have another man Officer Smith to back Reginal Jones and John Saua up who witnessed no wine either. There was another officer who was there as well, and he saw no wine either. That’s 4 men who witnessed Hendrix dead first before any doctor did. All 4 of these men who saw Hendrix dead before any doctor did saw no wine.
After Hendrix was removed from the flat there were two coroner’s officers and more police who examined and investigated the flat. They took the remaining pills, vomit samples, and took blankets for forensic analysis. These men saw no wine either. And we know the forensic analysis showed no wine since there was not any visible wine anywhere inside the flat where Hendrix died on the bed.
Wine trolls have a really hard time when they are cornered and confronted with expert testimony and forensics that debunks their phony claims. Which is why they are running around like chickens with their heads cut off trying to use any trick, phony claim, or word play game they can think up. It’s hilarious to see, but they have nothing that can ever refute the truth and they know it as well.
Phony claims, quotes, made up stories, word play games will never invent the wine at the flat that they so desperately want to claim their phony “Jimi Hendrix murder wine drowning scenario”.
Hi Jason. The hospital waited for Gerry Stickells to arrive and identify Jimi’s body then Dr. Seifert was able to fill out the hospital records and officially pronounce Jimi dead at 12:45 pm. Jimi’s PR agent Les Perrin said in an interview that Jimi was brought into the hospital at 11:45 and certified dead on arrival admitting that Jimi died of an overdose of sleeping pills to counter reports that Jimi died of hard drugs. Two police officers, Upton and Shaw, arrived at the hospital but did not question any of the doctors or ambulance attendants; in fact no hospital records exist which deal with any aspect of Jimi’s admittance to St.Mary’s that morning. Jimi’s presence was recorded only in the admittance book with name, age and time and date of admittance. A hospital spokesman gave a premature interview to the press, before the coroner’s findings, stating that Jimi died of an overdose of pills. Dr. Seifert said back then that Jimi was dead when brought into the resuscitation room pounding his heart a few times as it was pointless doing anything else as Jimi was clearly beyond help. The monitor remained flat so it became obvious to the doctors that any resuscitation attempt would be futile. All of the doctors stated that Jimi was dead on arrival and not unconscious. No doctor would attempt a prolonged resuscitation on a patient who had clearly been dead for as long as Jimi was. This would have been a ridiculous and pointless activity.
Hi Ivana,
Doctor Bob Brown said “no revival was possible” so there was no resuscitation attempts for a half hour like these hoaxers lie about. Even Fraud Bannister said Hendrix was cold and blue dead on arrival, already dead for hours . No half hour attempts are made on confirmed DOA’s.
Jason is just going to try to force his cheap trick of pretending he honestly believes that there was no mention of the wine at the Samarkand so therefore it doesn’t exist…There was mention of the wine only they used the word “vomit” because they had no reason to distinguish the wine at that time so they simply responded to the high wine-content vomit as “vomit”…Jason knows this but since he is denial trolling he’s going to try and milk it for as much as he can still keep getting attention for…I’m pretty sure Jason is one of the sick assholes who trolls me on the JFK research websites who followed me over here…
Jason tries to deny Sharon Lawrence’s witnessing of Monika admitting she poured wine on to Jimi by attacking Sharon Lawrence and calling her unreliable…Just like with Albert Allen, when a witness becomes undeniable as far as the murder evidence Jason needs to dismiss them all together in order to ignore their evidence…The reason Jason is pulling this cheap move is because he knows that if Monika admitted to pouring wine on Jimi, to the point it became an issue she moaned over and had to explain away, then there was no way that the other witnesses at the Samarkand would not have noticed it…Demented Jason is well aware that the several medical professionals who witnessed the wine on Jimi at hospital bridges over to this admitted pouring of wine on Jimi by Monika and verifies the wine being witnessed at the Samarkand…But the truth is Monika never poured any wine on Jimi…When Monika told that to Sharon Lawrence she was making up an excuse for wine she knew was used to murder Jimi and had spilled over on to him when it was being forced down his throat…That’s why she moaned…
Jason violates the rules of evidence above…If Jason tried the arguments he is making in front of a judge and jury he’d be laughed out of court…The way the rules of evidence work is confirmed evidence takes precedent over unconfirmed or theorized evidence…What Jason is trying to get away with above with his disingenuous manipulation of semantics is a classic case of proving a negative…Pseudological “evidence of absence”…But his obvious lies aren’t cutting it…Jason might have a case if there was no vomit at all at the Samarkand, but in this specific case we have a reasonable explanation for there being no mention of wine specifically at the Samarkand…And that is because it was being covered under the general term “vomit”…Also, if Monika said she poured wine on Jimi at the Samarkand that is certainly NOT an example of no one witnessing wine at the Samarkand as Jason falsely asserts…Sharon asked Monika why Jimi was covered in wine and Monika admitted he was by giving a reason for it…Jason is trying to avoid this in broad daylight and that makes him a demented liar…It’s not Sharon Lawrence who is uncredible here, as the snake oil salesman Jason assures us – it is Jason…
The wine witnessed by Dr’s Bannister, Brown, and Siefert is material, prima facie evidence…It is tangible evidence we can point to and use as proof…If Jason were sincere and somehow it turned out that there actually was no wine on Jimi at the Samarkand then the only reasonable explanation would be that the wine got on to Jimi en route in the ambulance and before he got to the hospital…Since that suggestion is obviously absurd then we can assume that the wine was present on Jimi at the Samarkand as Monika more than admitted…Since it was not possible for the wine to have gotten on Jimi any other place but the Samarkand we can reasonably assume that the wine witnessed by the doctors at St Mary’s was wine that was on Jimi at the Samarkand…The logical suggestion that since there was no wine specifically, literally mentioned by the witnesses at the Samarkand that therefore it could not have existed is a simple-minded logical fallacy that violates the rules of evidence more than anything and in no way does it preclude the wine…It is just a troll’s argument from an obvious troll when he has been cornered by the evidence…Meanwhile out in the real non-trolling world of reality, if we put Jason’s and my arguments in front of a jury he would be laughed out of court and that obvious twisted attempt to deny the wine with silly childish semantics would be firmly put down and disallowed and my evidence would prevail…The jury would simply say the wine witnessed at St Mary’s was good evidence and that it was impossible by reality for it to then therefore not exist at its point of origin at the Samarkand since there was no other alternative…The wine witnessed at St Mary’s forces it to also exist at the Samarkand by firm logic…According to the rules of evidence real wine that was witnessed takes precedent over the implied absence of wine by means of proving a negative…Nor was there even a legitimate absence of wine at the Samarkand…That was just a forced contrivance by a sick individual pretending he was arguing sincerely…There was evidence for the wine at the Samarkand despite Jason’s lies trying to deny it…It was in the “vomit” all the witnesses said was extraordinary just like the witnesses of the wine at hospital remarked…
Jason is a proven fraud because after the many times he had it explained to him that the ambulance men never penetrated the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat, and therefore never witnessed the 5 bottles of wine trapped behind it, he ignores it and once again says the ambulance men never witnessed the wine Jimi was drowned in…That right there proves Jason is a demented troll who is not here for honorable purposes…And Jason also ignores that we proved the wine Dr Bannister witnessed with Dr Thurston’s statement that “Jimi’s stomach contents showed he had imbibed a large amount of red wine”…That’s proof no matter how many times Jason trolls and denies it…
Quite correct, Buster….
Jason keeps pissing on his own head & telling himself it is raining with his constant urine stream of:
“John Saua and Reginal Jones gave a real honest and truthful testimony about what they witnessed at the flat. They clearly stated that they witnessed only vomit and never mentioned the word wine in their testimony.”
This just shows Jason pulling his usual self-decreed fabrications out of his ass, as at no time, anywhere, did the ambulance men ever say they witnessed “only vomit” — they never used the word “only” when they spoke of the vomit they saw, nor did they ever say that they didn’t see any wine.
Just how far did Jason have to dig into his own ass to pull out that load of self-decreed crap.
There’s no doubt Dr’s Brown, Siefert, and Bannister witnessed significant wine on Jimi…Siefert said he was covered in it…It is obvious that the reason Jason is so desperate to deny the wine, that all the credible professionals who were there witnessed and spoke about, is because he is aware that it backs Dr Bannister and therefore backs the claim Jimi was murdered by being drowned in wine…You can’t undo wine that was so firmly witnessed by the doctors at the hospital…What Jason is avoiding by doing this is why, if Jimi was just a normal overdose choking on vomit victim, was he soaked in wine?…Ivana said Jimi was just an ordinary barbiturate overdose victim like the ambulance men had seen many times before but she dishonestly ignored that none of those other victims were drenched in wine with a pint of wine soaking their afro like a sponge…
What Jason and Ivana do is seize the narrative by only focusing on narrow contrivances…However if you involve my barbiturate forensics, in order to view the total picture, like any competent analysis would do, you will see that Jimi died no more than 2 hours after taking 9 Vesparax and barbiturate forensics strictly preclude anyone with a known tolerance from dying in only 2 hours or less from that dose…These two dark web trolls Ivana and Jason are also ignoring that the volume of vomit witnessed on Jimi at the Samarkand bespeaks a healthy nervous system in Jimi that was nowhere near the terminal paralysis state required for choking on vomit…It is more than obvious that the extreme amount of vomit is forensic evidence that Mr Hendrix had an “action- reaction” body surge from having 5 bottles of wine poured down his throat drowning him while incapacitated on a dangerous yet non-fatal dose of Secobarbital…If you notice Jason and Ivana never answer the point that you can look at other real overdose choking on vomit cases and they will invariably have no such profuse vomit…
Anyone can go read the ambulance men’s statements here:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell.html
Or, they can also reference Tony Brown’s book “Hendrix — The Final Days” or Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”.
In none of those three references, that I just listed above, will anyone find the phrases “only vomit” or “vomit only” said by anyone, at any time.
The word “only” is being thrown into the mix by Jason alone, as a means to pull his self-decreed fabrication out of his ass.
And none of Jason’s long-winded blather provides an answer to the question of:
“what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink?” Nor does it refute that fact Moniks told both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkard flat on the day Jimi died.
Look up Buster…..
Ivana says: “Jimi’s PR agent Les Perrin said in an interview that Jimi was brought into the hospital at 11:45 and certified dead on arrival admitting that Jimi died of an overdose of sleeping pills to counter reports that Jimi died of hard drugs”.
That’s a lie. Perrin said in his statement to Dutch radio on that very day of Sept. 18, 1970 that the cause of Jimi’s death was UNKNOWN. Perrin never made any such admission of “Jimi died of an overdose of sleeping pills to counter reports that Jimi died of hard drugs”.
And more of Ivana’s evasive blather stating ” All of the doctors stated that Jimi was dead on arrival and not unconscious. No doctor would attempt a prolonged resuscitation on a patient who had clearly been dead for as long as Jimi was. This would have been a ridiculous and pointless activity.”
Nice try by Ivana pretending that she didn’t see the following that was posted earlier, but she fails and doesn’t answer directly or refute this:
“Both Siefert and Bannister stated that they did work on him. It was pointed out already the time frame was from 11:45AM (the time Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots) to 12:15PM (the time the doctors quit working on Jimi and declared him dead), and this was printed in Mitch Mitchell’s book published in 1990, and they most likely got that info from the hospital report.
The coroner’s form stated on it “Unable to Resuscitate”. Anybody can go to You Tube and watch the video “The Last 24 Hours” and if they watch closely, then they will see that the coroner’s form does indeed say “Unable to Resuscitate”.
If Ivana’s BS claim of “The doctors would not have cleaned or tampered with Jimi’s body in any way before it was handed over to the coroner for the autopsy” were true, then Jimi would have been declared dead much sooner than 12:15PM.”
Just like her brother Jason, she’s clearly pulling self-decreed fabrications out of her ass.
Sorry wine troll. There is no testimony of any red wine witnessed at the flat. You two wine trolls keep claiming gallons of red wine that was never witnessed.
BUSTER says: There’s no doubt Dr’s Brown, Siefert, and Bannister witnessed significant wine on Jimi…Siefert said he was covered in it…It is obvious that the reason Jason is so desperate to deny the wine, that all the credible professionals who were there witnessed and spoke about, is because he is aware that it backs Dr Bannister and therefore backs the claim Jimi was murdered by being drowned in wine…You can’t undo wine that was so firmly witnessed by the doctors at the hospital…What Jason is avoiding by doing this is why, if Jimi was just a normal overdose choking on vomit victim, was he soaked in wine?…Ivana said Jimi was just an ordinary barbiturate overdose victim like the ambulance men had seen many times before but she dishonestly ignored that none of those other victims were drenched in wine with a pint of wine soaking their afro like a sponge…
JASON says: Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi. The ambulance men and police men never did either. So, no wine on Jimi first the flat means no wine later at the hospital.
BUSTER says: What Jason and Ivana do is seize the narrative by only focusing on narrow contrivances…However if you involve my barbiturate forensics, in order to view the total picture, like any competent analysis would do, you will see that Jimi died no more than 2 hours after taking 9 Vesparax and barbiturate forensics strictly preclude anyone with a known tolerance from dying in only 2 hours or less from that dose…These two dark web trolls Ivana and Jason are also ignoring that the volume of vomit witnessed on Jimi at the Samarkand bespeaks a healthy nervous system in Jimi that was nowhere near the terminal paralysis state required for choking on vomit…It is more than obvious that the extreme amount of vomit is forensic evidence that Mr Hendrix had an “action- reaction” body surge from having 5 bottles of wine poured down his throat drowning him while incapacitated on a dangerous yet non-fatal dose of Secobarbital…If you notice Jason and Ivana never answer the point that you can look at other real overdose choking on vomit cases and they will invariably have no such profuse vomit…
JASON says: Your forensics is a joke. Real forensic analysis proved Hendrix died of a barbiturate overdose due to inhalation of vomit.
BUSTER says: Jason is just going to try to force his cheap trick of pretending he honestly believes that there was no mention of the wine at the Samarkand so therefore it doesn’t exist…There was mention of the wine only they used the word “vomit” because they had no reason to distinguish the wine at that time so they simply responded to the high wine-content vomit as “vomit”…Jason knows this but since he is denial trolling he’s going to try and milk it for as much as he can still keep getting attention for…I’m pretty sure Jason is one of the sick assholes who trolls me on the JFK research websites who followed me over here…
JASON says: Well, when you don’t have any evidence for your phony wine claims, just make stuff up like Buster does. Buster has no evidence, so he resorts to character attacks and using foul language.
Buster has made up fake and phony wine claims that he seriously overly exaggerated and now he got caught in a big lie. Buster has been refuted by both ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones. Now he doesn’t know what to do. So he then attacks me of course instead of taking responsibility for his own actions.
We won’t let Buster get away with his word play games. Buster has constantly claimed a red wine drowning with a Hendrix murder scene. Buster says Hendrix was soaked in wine with it flooding up past his throat.
Reginal Jones and John Saua never witnessed no such scene. They witnessed no wine on Hendrix and only dry vomit inside Hendrix’s throat. So what happened to all the flooded throat of wine Buster claimed? What about the wine soaked Jimi and the bed full of red wine Buster claimed? These men never ever witnessed what Buster claims, Red wine would be obvious if it was there. It wasn’t. They only witnessed brown vomit. The never witnessed red wine like Buster lied about.
So, the only troll here is you Buster posting lies and misinformation. That’s what a troll does. I’m posting the truth and accurate information.
BUSTER says: Jason tries to deny Sharon Lawrence’s witnessing of Monika admitting she poured wine on to Jimi by attacking Sharon Lawrence and calling her unreliable…Just like with Albert Allen, when a witness becomes undeniable as far as the murder evidence Jason needs to dismiss them all together in order to ignore their evidence…The reason Jason is pulling this cheap move is because he knows that if Monika admitted to pouring wine on Jimi, to the point it became an issue she moaned over and had to explain away, then there was no way that the other witnesses at the Samarkand would not have noticed it…Demented Jason is well aware that the several medical professionals who witnessed the wine on Jimi at hospital bridges over to this admitted pouring of wine on Jimi by Monika and verifies the wine being witnessed at the Samarkand…But the truth is Monika never poured any wine on Jimi…When Monika told that to Sharon Lawrence she was making up an excuse for wine she knew was used to murder Jimi and had spilled over on to him when it was being forced down his throat…That’s why she moaned…
JASON says: Buster pathetically is using what Sharon Lawrence said in her book about one bottle of wine. Sharon Lawrence was not at the flat to witness Hendrix dead. Reginal Jones, John Saua, Ian Smith were and all 3 of them witnessed no wine drowning as you claim.
Where are the many other bottles of red wine you said Jimi was physically drowned in? You are only citing one bottle of wine. You are missing the several bottles of red wine you can’t account for with your phony claim. That’s the reason you lost your phony claim. Also, Sharon Lawrence said Jimi committed suicide with pills so the wine story you credit her with is irrelevant since Lawrence believes pills caused Hendrix’s death.
John Saua and Reginal Jones never saw Jimi Hendrix drowned in wine. Officer Ian Smith never witnessed Hendrix soaked in wine either. They witnessed no wine on Hendrix and they witnessed the death scene. You can’t be covered in only vomit at the flat and then magically be soaked in red wine at the hospital. Brown vomit is not “red wine” as you falsely are now trying to claim with your word games.
You’re changing your story again Buster. You just told me recently that “nobody would need to force wine into Jimi” cuz he was incapacitated with pills first. Do you even remember which story you want to claim? Do I need to post your quote again?
BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
BUSTER says: October 15, 2019
When Monika told that to Sharon Lawrence she was making up an excuse for wine she knew was used to murder Jimi and had spilled over on to him when it was being forced down his throat.
JASON says: There you are saying “no one would need to force wine into Jimi” and now you’re changing your story back to wine being “forced down Jimi’s throat”. Which fake story do you want to claim? You change your stories when It suits your needs to make a phony claim. That is called trolling Buster.
BUSTER says: Jason violates the rules of evidence above…If Jason tried the arguments he is making in front of a judge and jury he’d be laughed out of court…The way the rules of evidence work is confirmed evidence takes precedent over unconfirmed or theorized evidence…What Jason is trying to get away with above with his disingenuous manipulation of semantics is a classic case of proving a negative…Pseudological “evidence of absence”…But his obvious lies aren’t cutting it…Jason might have a case if there was no vomit at all at the Samarkand, but in this specific case we have a reasonable explanation for there being no mention of wine specifically at the Samarkand…And that is because it was being covered under the general term “vomit”…Also, if Monika said she poured wine on Jimi at the Samarkand that is certainly NOT an example of no one witnessing wine at the Samarkand as Jason falsely asserts…Sharon asked Monika why Jimi was covered in wine and Monika admitted he was by giving a reason for it…Jason is trying to avoid this in broad daylight and that makes him a demented liar…It’s not Sharon Lawrence who is uncredible here, as the snake oil salesman Jason assures us – it is Jason…
JASON says: I’m posting official credible eye witness testimony by ambulance men who refutes your phony claims and Sharon Lawrence. She already perjured herself under oath in court and made up many fake accounts in her book. You would get laughed out of court trying to claim brown vomit is “red wine”. You claimed a “massive wine drowning”. John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed that. So, don’t get angry with me, be mad at yourself for making up false stories of “gallons of wine” that was never at the flat.
BUSTER says: The wine witnessed by Dr’s Bannister, Brown, and Siefert is material, prima facie evidence…It is tangible evidence we can point to and use as proof…If Jason were sincere and somehow it turned out that there actually was no wine on Jimi at the Samarkand then the only reasonable explanation would be that the wine got on to Jimi en route in the ambulance and before he got to the hospital…Since that suggestion is obviously absurd then we can assume that the wine was present on Jimi at the Samarkand as Monika more than admitted…Since it was not possible for the wine to have gotten on Jimi any other place but the Samarkand we can reasonably assume that the wine witnessed by the doctors at St Mary’s was wine that was on Jimi at the Samarkand…The logical suggestion that since there was no wine specifically, literally mentioned by the witnesses at the Samarkand that therefore it could not have existed is a simple-minded logical fallacy that violates the rules of evidence more than anything and in no way does it preclude the wine…It is just a troll’s argument from an obvious troll when he has been cornered by the evidence…Meanwhile out in the real non-trolling world of reality, if we put Jason’s and my arguments in front of a jury he would be laughed out of court and that obvious twisted attempt to deny the wine with silly childish semantics would be firmly put down and disallowed and my evidence would prevail…The jury would simply say the wine witnessed at St Mary’s was good evidence and that it was impossible by reality for it to then therefore not exist at its point of origin at the Samarkand since there was no other alternative…The wine witnessed at St Mary’s forces it to also exist at the Samarkand by firm logic…According to the rules of evidence real wine that was witnessed takes precedent over the implied absence of wine by means of proving a negative…Nor was there even a legitimate absence of wine at the Samarkand…That was just a forced contrivance by a sick individual pretending he was arguing sincerely…There was evidence for the wine at the Samarkand despite Jason’s lies trying to deny it…It was in the “vomit” all the witnesses said was extraordinary just like the witnesses of the wine at hospital remarked…
JASON says: Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix. Brown only said he had a “bit too much to drink”. In all of Buster’s incoherent ramblings, he fails to understand one simple thing. All the men at the flat never witnessed a “wine drowning scene”. If there was all this “gallons of wine” that Buster keeps trying to claim was there at the flat, all of the men would have testified to witnessing “gallons of wine”. They never witnessed any wine cuz there wasn’t any there. They only witnessed brown vomit.
Buster forgets the phony wine claims started with Bannister in 1992 so Buster is used to hearing about and peddling the wine hoax. The ambulance men testified to what they actually witnessed on 9/18/70 and there was no wine at the flat. They only witnessed brown vomit.
BUSTER says: Jason is a proven fraud because after the many times he had it explained to him that the ambulance men never penetrated the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat, and therefore never witnessed the 5 bottles of wine trapped behind it, he ignores it and once again says the ambulance men never witnessed the wine Jimi was drowned in…That right there proves Jason is a demented troll who is not here for honorable purposes…And Jason also ignores that we proved the wine Dr Bannister witnessed with Dr Thurston’s statement that “Jimi’s stomach contents showed he had imbibed a large amount of red wine”…That’s proof no matter how many times Jason trolls and denies.
JASON says: The only fraud here is you who continues to peddle lies and misinformation for your now destroyed wine hoax.
There was never a “hard plug of vomit” in Jimi’s throat. You are changing fake stories again. You lied claiming Jimi was “forced drowned in red wine” flooded up way past his throat. You called it an “overkill”. There is no possible way to have a “hard plug of vomit” form when you claimed his throat was flooded with liquid wine. You just contradicted both of your phony claims.
Reginal Jones and John Saua witnessed dry vomit all the way down Jimi’s throat. They never witnessed a “hard plug of vomit” nor did they witness a flooded throat full of wine. Both of your claims are lies.
Dr. Thurston never made any statement like that. You are lying. Sharon Lawrence wrote that unconfirmed quote in her book. She claimed Jack Meehan told her that. Dr. Thurston is never on an official record making that statement.
Dr. Thurston’s official statement says: “The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication”. That is also confirmed by Reginal Jones, John Saua, Ian Smith, and Doctor Bob Brown. 5 men said it was inhalation of vomit. Not a phony wine drowning.
Do tell Flyswatter what work did they perform on Jimi exactly beyond pounding his chest a few times like Dr.Seifert said. Unable to resuscitate means that Jimi was dead on arrival and any work on a corpse would have been futile. Dr Seifert was waiting for Gerry Stickells to identify the body for that half hour and not doing major resuscitation work like suctioning out the imaginary copious amount of wine. The doctors clearly stated that Jimi was dead on arrival and flatlined with little that could have been done to save his life. They would not have wasted time and energy on someone who had all the tell tail signs of being dead for a long period of time; the doctors through experience would have able to notice this. If there was wine in Jimi’s system then it would have been consumed throughout the evening at the two get togethers he attended. You and Buster have both persisted with this murder scenario for a while even though the alleged murderer Michael Jeffrey was in Spain at the time and not in London. You seem reluctant or unable to let go of this even though your major sources for this have been discredited as being untrue and unreliable. None of the more reputable books imply murder by waterboarding with wine only that Jimi ingested the wine earlier in the evening and/or swallowed the pills with the wine-a lethal combination but they all state cause of death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication and not death by drowning in red wine. This fictional scenario was obviously added years later for whatever reason and it directly contradicts the official cause of death. No-one at the time suspected or implied murder; if that amount of wine was witnessed or existed then the official cause of death would have differed from the original one and treated differently from a normal overdose and more importantly investigated further. The cause of death was obvious to everyone present and therefore it did not need any further investigation. Unfortunately hoaxers go digging where there is nothing to be found and always come up empty having wasted their time on fantasy and speculation. Try an accept, if you can, the official record for once and stop wasting time and energy on non sensical scenarios and suspicious thinking.
Buster has a real hard time trying to validate his phony wine claim.
Buster told us Jimi Hendrix was physically drowned in wine. He also said Jimi was soaked in wine. He even said Jimi was filled full of wine to full capacity way past his throat. Buster said Jimi was “murdered in a wine drowning homicide” with gallons of flooding wine.
Ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua said Jimi was covered in vomit with dry vomit down his throat. They never witnessed Jimi physically drowned in wine. They never witnessed Jimi filled up to full capacity with wine flooding way past his throat. They never witnessed gallons of red wine flooding the bed. They never witnessed a “murder by wine homicide scene” like Buster constantly tells us. The ambulance men refuted everything Buster has said.
So how can Buster still claim Hendrix was physically drowned in wine when the ambulance men never witnessed it?
How can Buster still claim Hendrix was filled up to full capacity with wine way past his throat when the ambulance men witnesssed dry vomit all the way down Jimi’s throat?
How can Buster still claim Hendrix was soaked in wine with gallons of wine all around the bed when the ambulance men never witnessed gallons of wine anywhere?
How can Buster still claim a “murder by wine homicide” when both ambulance men and police men never witnessed a scene that Buster is stating?
Buster has a real difficult time trying to explain this.
It is impossible for Buster to explain the impossible.
Buster has been caught red handed making severe lies.
All of Buster’s phony claims contradict each other. So there is no way for him to explain a throat full of red wine (that he always states happened) when Jimi’s throat was dry with vomit. This is impossible. This clearly means there was never a “massive wine drowning” with wine flooding way past Jimi’s throat since both ambulance men witnessed a dry throat with dry vomit. Buster claims a flooded wet throat flooded with wine. That’s impossible since Jimi’s throat was dry with dry vomit witnessed by Reginal Jones and John Saua. Buster got caught in a terrible lie and doesnt know what to do.
Buster then used a new phony claim of “a hard plug of vomit” that formed in Jimi’s throat which prevented the ambulance men from seeing the wine. Well, this phony new claim is even worse. No hard “plug of vomit” could ever form in Jimi’s throat when Buster originally kept telling us wine was flooded up way past his throat. The wet flooded wine in Jimi’s throat would prevent a dry “hard plug of vomit” from ever forming. Buster just got caught in another terrible lie even worse than the first. Science refutes this new phony ridiculous claim from Buster. John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed Jimi’s throat flooded with wine or a “hard plug of vomit”.
Buster is calling himself a liar. Buster always said Jimi had a throat full of flooded wine filled up to full capacity into his stomach. He now changed that phony claim to “a hard plug of vomit”. So, when Buster now claims “a hard plug of vomit” he is telling us he lied about the flooded throat of wine. No “hard plug of vomit” could ever form when Buster told us that Jimi had a flooded throat full of wine. The flooded throat Buster claimed could never be dry with a “hard plug of vomit” . That is totally impossible. Buster has lied about both phony claims cuz John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed a flooded wet throat flooded with wine or a “hard plug of vomit”. Buster lied and has contradicted both of his phony claims. He has no idea what he wants to claim for his phony “Jimi Hendrix wine murder”. Readers will hold Buster accountable for his claims since both are fraudulent.
How does Buster explain no physical wine drowning at the flat after this is all he talked about?
How does Buster explain that Jimi was never physically drowned and soaked in wine?
How does Buster explain no massive amounts of red wine witnessed on the bed, blankets, and pillows?
How does Buster explain brown vomit witnessed by ambulance men on the pillows when Buster claims “red wine” was soaked in gallons on the pillows?
How does Buster expiain dry vomit all the way down Jimi’s throat witnessed by ambulance men when Buster says Jimi was filled up to full capacity with wine way past his throat spilling out of his mouth?
Red wine would be obvious to the ambulance men soaking the bed and pillows. They witnessed no red wine on the pillows. Just brown vomit. Buster has been refuted.
Red wine would be obvious soaking Jimi in a physical wine drowning. The ambulance men only witnessed brown vomit. Buster has been refuted.
So Buster is at a crossroads. He has no idea which claim he wants to make or to stick with. Personally, I think he should come up with a brand new one since the Ambulance men’s testimony refute both of his phony claims.
Is Buster still going to be a wine troll still claiming “a massive wine drowning” after John Saua and Reginal Jones demolished his phony “wine drowning” that never happened? We shall see what Buster decides to do.
Doctor Bob Brown said no work was done on Jimi. Siefert said he worked on Jimi for a few minutes. Bannister later admitted it was “merely a formality”.
So, all 3 doctors said at some point there was no wine removal or half hour wine surging resuscitation attempts.
Jason is a sick individual who did not deny he was one of the assholes who regularly trolls me on Kennedy assassination websites who followed me over here…If we could pull the curtain up on Jason and his phony self-imposed Skeptoid authority we would see he is a sick person with a keyboard who likes to spend his time defending evil by means of deliberately disingenuous Skeptoid-like arguments for the sake of argument rather than finding the truth…There’s a very obvious reality that Jason seeks to avoid by existing only in the false world of his undeserved presence here…That reality is if we could find out who Jason is and expose him in public you would see he is a twisted fuck who likes fucking with people by pretending he is honestly challenging genuine arguments of evidence when his real purpose is figuring out any lying denial he can throw in to a good case of evidence…If we could expose this scumbag and bring him in front of the people he slanders and says are lying or hoaxing we would quickly see he is just a pathetic dark web troll who has way too much equal posting space for the poisonous shit he posts…If we brought this sick fuck next to the good Dr Bannister we would quickly see this coward Jason shrivel up like the pant cuff-nipping jerk he is and we would quickly see who was the truth-teller and who was the attention seeking Skeptoid denier troll…Free Speech does not extend to vandals and sick people only looking to disrupt with ill-intended lies…What Jason isn’t being held accountable to is the fact he claims every person with the best incriminating evidence is either lying, trying to make money off a book, or perpetrating a hoax…With Jason this strange phenomenon of viral corruption amongst every single major witness is something that only he himself has exposed, even though that reality I am referring to, where Jason is taken from the safety of his protected trolling anonymity and made to confront these people face to face and tell them they are liars – like Albert Allen, Sharon Lawrence, and the good doctor Bannister…We would quickly see how much credibility Jason and his charges have out there on the real playing field of reality and not here in the false world of unmoderated trolling Jason exploits…Jason is the sick exploiter of a false internet world where persons don’t exist and never have to account for themselves…Therefore they can lie freely about people with no accountability and never have to answer for it…
So after Jason has once again unloaded an overly long avalanche of bullshit we are still back to the judge and jury I was talking about and that court room…If you read Jason’s last responses he is just repeating the same lies again with firm conviction and not answering the good points he has failed to answer repeatedly…Jason is lying when he says Bob Brown never witnessed wine on Jimi…Bob Brown was obviously referring to the wine that Dr Siefert couldn’t have made any clearer when he stated “Jimi was covered in red wine”…Brown was obviously referring to the same wine that Monika admitted pouring on Jimi when Sharon Lawrence asked her why Jimi was soaked in wine…Jason is a lying piece of shit when he claims the ambulance men only mentioned dry vomit…Like the true demented troll Jason is, he tries to hide behind his lie that the ambulance men only witnessed dry vomit while ignoring that there couldn’t possibly have been only dry vomit if every single medical witness who saw Jimi after the Samarkand remarked that he was soaked in wine…And that includes Dr Brown, no matter how much this lying piece of shit Jason tries to use dishonest semantics to force his lies over what is more than obvious from those other witnesses…I think Jason has shown enough deliberate dishonesty and intentional denying of good evidence with this that if I were moderator I would boot him…It is common sense that sick trolls don’t deserve free speech access to practice their demented efforts…That jury I am referencing would quickly side with us and say you can’t undo wine that was witnessed at the hospital by credible medical witnesses, nor can you make it go away with the idiotic trolling Jason offers…Jason never really answered my argument about proven material evidence taking precedent over the theoretical evidence of absence…He’s hoping we’ll keep answering his trolling replies…
Jason hand-waves my barbiturate forensics away because he cannot answer them…They are irrefutable which is why Jason ridicules them but publicly passes on giving any credible answer to them…A judge would quickly boot Jason out of the court room in that real world reality I reference…
Because Jason has destroyed the previous integrity of this comments section with his sick trolling we are not having the more credible intelligent discussion of why the hard plug of vomit blocked the wine Dr Bannister witnessed…No matter how many times Jason is informed that the ambulance men could not see the wine Dr Bannister witnessed because it was blocked behind a hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat that their equipment could not penetrate, Jason ignores this correct explanation and trolls that the ambulance men did not witness the wine at the Samarkand…Jason is contemptuously ignoring that the ambulance men could not see wine that they had no means of accessing behind that hard plug of vomit…Jason is a sick troll so he tries to force others in to his sick reality that any witnessing must be perfectly repeated by all witnesses to be valid…So if Dr Bannister removed 5 bottles of wine from Jimi then everyone involved must have that exact same witnessing and must also use the exact same words all the time everywhere or the whole claim gets rejected…That of course is ridiculous and any intelligent person with common sense can see trolling Jason is just using it to force his semantic, sophist bullshit before the real evidence in order to avoid it…Because of that dishonest obfuscation of good discussion we are not talking about how Jimi could end up with 5 bottles of wine inside him that was corked-in by a hard plug of vomit…This is an interesting area to explore because it deals in physiology and body functions…The reason Jimi ended up with the wine corked behind vomit is because the lungs are not meant to hold fluids…They are designed to hold air and do not have the capacity to hold fluids…When as much wine was poured in to Jimi as he could hold the stronger stomach muscles that are part of the vomiting reflex took over and shunted the epiglottis in the stomach/throat direction like a railroad switch…Jimi had an extreme vomit reaction (that Jason ignored in his blowhard denial speech) and that vomit reaction shut the wine in to the lungs…Jimi died with his body in that last gasp vomit surge configuration which left the vomit in the throat with the remaining wine sealed in the lungs and stomach…It is obvious that those present knew he was murdered so they just left him and never attempted to help him (which this simple-minded denier idiot Jason also ignores)…My barbiturate forensics that Jason ignored prove why this could not have happened in only 1 or 2 hours…Also – the collapsed lung Dr Teare noted was due to the lungs not being able to withstand fluids or the force of them being suctioned out…The half liter of fluid Dr Teare identified in Jimi’s lungs contained some residual wine…
Jason is a shameless liar because it would be impossible for the vomit at the Samarkand to only be dry vomit, as he says, while ambulance man Suau described it as being a big “pool”…The totally dry vomit that Jason is trolling could never be described as a “pool”, that obviously connotes a significant liquid content…It is obvious that Jason is just taunting us with idiotic denial, but any rational, intelligent, honest person who reads this can see we’ve made our case…It’s probably a mistake to continue answering the unfiltered troll Jason…
More lies, foul language, made up repeated phony claims from Buster. What else is new
BUSTER says: Jason is a sick individual who did not deny he was one of the assholes who regularly trolls me on Kennedy assassination websites who followed me over here…
JASON says: I have no clue what you’re talking about Buster. Just more cheap character attacks from you cuz you lost your phony wine claim and you’re spinning out of control. More foul language too.
You got caught in your lies about the “massive amount of wine” you cant account for and now you don’t know what to do. Repeating the same debunked claims over and over again isn’t going to repair your reputation. The readers all know these claims are phony and have been debunked.
BUSTER says: If we could pull the curtain up on Jason and his phony self-imposed Skeptoid authority we would see he is a sick person with a keyboard who likes to spend his time defending evil by means of deliberately disingenuous Skeptoid-like arguments for the sake of argument rather than finding the truth…
JASON says: The “evil means” is coming from you, posting fake claims saying that Jimi was “murdered”. I am posting the truth, and you don’t like it cuz it refutes your garbage. The ambulance men witnessed no wine on Jimi and neither did Officer Ian Smith. Doctor Bob Brown witnessed no wine on Jimi either. That is the truth and those are the facts.
This is all your fault Buster. You made up wild fake and phony wine claims that you can’t answer for. Now you got caught in your lies and you have no answer to get out of your lies. That is your own doing. Now you are melting down after the curtain rises up and exposes your fraud.
BUSTER says: There’s a very obvious reality that Jason seeks to avoid by existing only in the false world of his undeserved presence here…That reality is if we could find out who Jason is and expose him in public you would see he is a twisted fuck who likes fucking with people by pretending he is honestly challenging genuine arguments of evidence when his real purpose is figuring out any lying denial he can throw in to a good case of evidence…
JASON says: You need help. You’re the one who made up fake wild stories claiming Jimi was murdered with “gallons of wine” in a “massive wine drowning” that never existed. Ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua never witnessed any scene like this. That is the absolute truth.
You don’t post “good evidence”. You post fake claims and blatant lies. You lied saying Jimi Hendrix was filled up full of wine through his stomach flooding up way past his throat flooding into his mouth as an “overkill”. Then after you read John Saua’s testimony, you realized you were screwed and that phony claim of yours wouldn’t work for you anymore.
Then you changed that phony claim to the “hard plug of vomit” thinking that you were clever enough to still claim your bogus wine. You figured you still could claim wine anyway. Well, the problem with your new fake claim is that science and John Saua refutes you. There is no way possible that a “throat full of liquid wine” as you always claim could then magically become dry with a “hard plug of vomit”. That is scientifically impossible.
Both of your claims are fraudulent and you’ve been exposed.
Also, John Saua never witnessed any “throat full of liquid wine” or a “hard plug of vomit”. So, you lose both fake and phony claims. This is your own fault for making up fake stories and blatant lies. You should hang your head in shame.
BUSTER says: If we could expose this scumbag and bring him in front of the people he slanders and says are lying or hoaxing we would quickly see he is just a pathetic dark web troll who has way too much equal posting space for the poisonous shit he posts…If we brought this sick fuck next to the good Dr Bannister we would quickly see this coward Jason shrivel up like the pant cuff-nipping jerk he is and we would quickly see who was the truth-teller and who was the attention seeking Skeptoid denier troll…
JASON says: The “good Doctor Bannister” is not a good doctor. Ex Doctor Bannister was convicted for 3 counts of fraudulent conduct in 1992 and was struck off the medical register for fraudulent conduct. This man lost his medical license due to fraud. This is the man Buster holds in “high esteem” who has lied repeatedly making phony claims. Doctor Bob Brown refutes Bannister. He never witnessed any wine and doesn’t believe Jimi was “murdered”. You believe in a fraud and are stuck with your phony claims.Your foul language is terrible.
Let me remind you, that both John Saua and Reginal Jones refute Bannister cuz they never ever witnessed Jimi Hendrix soaked in wine. They only witnessed brown vomit.
BUSTER says: Free Speech does not extend to vandals and sick people only looking to disrupt with ill-intended lies…What Jason isn’t being held accountable to is the fact he claims every person with the best incriminating evidence is either lying, trying to make money off a book, or perpetrating a hoax…With Jason this strange phenomenon of viral corruption amongst every single major witness is something that only he himself has exposed, even though that reality I am referring to, where Jason is taken from the safety of his protected trolling anonymity and made to confront these people face to face and tell them they are liars – like Albert Allen, Sharon Lawrence, and the good doctor Bannister…We would quickly see how much credibility Jason and his charges have out there on the real playing field of reality and not here in the false world of unmoderated trolling Jason exploits…Jason is the sick exploiter of a false internet world where persons don’t exist and never have to account for themselves…Therefore they can lie freely about people with no accountability and never have to answer for it…
JASON says: Again, you demand that I am banned cuz you don’t like the truth I post. That’s too bad. My free speech allows me to post the truth and not just the nonsense you believe. You don’t get to dictate what is posted on a site. Your goal is to suppress the real evidence so you can push your phony Hendrix murder hoax.
Ambulance Men John Saua and Reginal Jones refutes what these “authors” in your tabloid book write about. These “authors” were not at the flat to witness the death scene. John Saua and Reginal Jones were, and their testimony refutes all the lies and made up claims from these “authors” you parrot as your “evidence”.
BUSTER says: So after Jason has once again unloaded an overly long avalanche of bullshit we are still back to the judge and jury I was talking about and that court room…If you read Jason’s last responses he is just repeating the same lies again with firm conviction and not answering the good points he has failed to answer repeatedly…Jason is lying when he says Bob Brown never witnessed wine on Jimi…Bob Brown was obviously referring to the wine that Dr Siefert couldn’t have made any clearer when he stated “Jimi was covered in red wine”…Brown was obviously referring to the same wine that Monika admitted pouring on Jimi when Sharon Lawrence asked her why Jimi was soaked in wine…Jason is a lying piece of shit when he claims the ambulance men only mentioned dry vomit…Like the true demented troll Jason is, he tries to hide behind his lie that the ambulance men only witnessed dry vomit while ignoring that there couldn’t possibly have been only dry vomit if every single medical witness who saw Jimi after the Samarkand remarked that he was soaked in wine…And that includes Dr Brown, no matter how much this lying piece of shit Jason tries to use dishonest semantics to force his lies over what is more than obvious from those other witnesses…I think Jason has shown enough deliberate dishonesty and intentional denying of good evidence with this that if I were moderator I would boot him…It is common sense that sick trolls don’t deserve free speech access to practice their demented efforts…That jury I am referencing would quickly side with us and say you can’t undo wine that was witnessed at the hospital by credible medical witnesses, nor can you make it go away with the idiotic trolling Jason offers…Jason never really answered my argument about proven material evidence taking precedent over the theoretical evidence of absence…He’s hoping we’ll keep answering his trolling replies…
JASON says: More blather here posting your own personal opinion rather than the facts. Funny that you always talk about Bob Brown. You will hear about him very soon.
it’s pathetic you don’t believe honest and truthful testimony from the ambulance men. Why don’t you want the truth to come out? Why you you want to continue to push his phony Hendrix murder hoax? Reginal Jones and John Saua witnessed no wine on Jimi Hendrix and neither did Doctor Bob Brown.
BUSTER says: Jason hand-waves my barbiturate forensics away because he cannot answer them…They are irrefutable which is why Jason ridicules them but publicly passes on giving any credible answer to them…A judge would quickly boot Jason out of the court room in that real world reality I reference
JASON says: Your “forensic evidence” is not real evidence. It is a pile of crap made up opinion that you make up for your fake claims. You constantly change it all the time. The judge would laugh you out of court.
Real tested forensic evidence that was analyzed from Jimi’s body and at the crime scene refutes your own opinion. That is the real forensic evidence that proved Jimi Hendrix died from vomit inhalation due to a barbiturate overdose.
BUSTER says: Because Jason has destroyed the previous integrity of this comments section with his sick trolling we are not having the more credible intelligent discussion of why the hard plug of vomit blocked the wine Dr Bannister witnessed…No matter how many times Jason is informed that the ambulance men could not see the wine Dr Bannister witnessed because it was blocked behind a hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat that their equipment could not penetrate, Jason ignores this correct explanation and trolls that the ambulance men did not witness the wine at the Samarkand…Jason is contemptuously ignoring that the ambulance men could not see wine that they had no means of accessing behind that hard plug of vomit…Jason is a sick troll so he tries to force others in to his sick reality that any witnessing must be perfectly repeated by all witnesses to be valid…So if Dr Bannister removed 5 bottles of wine from Jimi then everyone involved must have that exact same witnessing and must also use the exact same words all the time everywhere or the whole claim gets rejected…That of course is ridiculous and any intelligent person with common sense can see trolling Jason is just using it to force his semantic, sophist bullshit before the real evidence in order to avoid it…Because of that dishonest obfuscation of good discussion we are not talking about how Jimi could end up with 5 bottles of wine inside him that was corked-in by a hard plug of vomit…This is an interesting area to explore because it deals in physiology and body functions…The reason Jimi ended up with the wine corked behind vomit is because the lungs are not meant to hold fluids…They are designed to hold air and do not have the capacity to hold fluids…When as much wine was poured in to Jimi as he could hold the stronger stomach muscles that are part of the vomiting reflex took over and shunted the epiglottis in the stomach/throat direction like a railroad switch…Jimi had an extreme vomit reaction (that Jason ignored in his blowhard denial speech) and that vomit reaction shut the wine in to the lungs…Jimi died with his body in that last gasp vomit surge configuration which left the vomit in the throat with the remaining wine sealed in the lungs and stomach…It is obvious that those present knew he was murdered so they just left him and never attempted to help him (which this simple-minded denier idiot Jason also ignores)…My barbiturate forensics that Jason ignored prove why this could not have happened in only 1 or 2 hours…Also – the collapsed lung Dr Teare noted was due to the lungs not being able to withstand fluids or the force of them being suctioned out…The half liter of fluid Dr Teare identified in Jimi’s lungs contained some residual wine…
JASON says: More made up debunked garbage squeezed into a bloated paragraph. How many times are you going to repeat this phony stuff?
There was “no hard plug of vomit”, Bannister never removed 5 bottles of wine, Jimi vomited from mixing wine he drank at Harvey’s and Kameron’s party along with a powerful amphetamine and 9 Vesparax tablets. That was a deadly concoction. Your “forensics” are a joke, and Jimi only had a ‘partially’ collapsed left lung.
No wine was analyzed in Dr. Teare’s autopsy since Buster told me Dr.Teare had no knowledge of any wine. Remember this?
BUSTER says: October 11, 2019
Dr Teare had no way of knowing about the wine because it was removed and disposed of 3 days earlier at the hospital.
BUSTER says: Ocotober 16, 2019
The half liter of fluid Dr Teare identified in Jimi’s lungs contained some residual wine
JASON says: Here’s another time you change your stories when it suits your needs. This is called trolling. You said Dr. Teare had no knowledge of wine and now you say he did. Which story do you want to claim? You pull this nonsense all the time.
No “hard plug of vomit” was ever witnessed by John Saua or Reginal Jones and they witnessed no wine either.
Buster claimed that Jimi Hendrix was flooded with wine way up to his throat spilling into his mouth as an “overkill”. The dumbass doesn’t realize that his new fake “hard plug of vomit” claim totally refutes his entire fake Hendrix wine murder.
A flooded throat full of red wine as Buster first claimed, doesn’t magically become dry with a “hard plug of vomit”. That is totally impossible. This means that Buster’s entire claim is a phony hoax.
The ambulance men never witnessed Jimi’s throat full of wine like Buster first claimed. The ambulance men never witnessed any “hard plug of vomit like Buster is now claiming. The only reason Buster changed his first claim of liquid wine flooded in the throat, was cuz he read Saua’s testimony where he witnessed only dry vomit. There was no wine witnessed. Buster quickly changed to a new fake claim of a “hard plug of vomit” so he can still claim wine. The dumbass can’t figure out that his new claim refutes his first claim, and Saua refutes them both.
Saua witnessed no wine in flooding up in Jimi’s throat. So Buster is calling himself a liar.
Saua never witnessed a “hard plug of vomit” either. Buster is a liar for making up this new phony claim and all the others.
So this expert witness testimony by John Saua demolishes Buster’s phony wine murder hoax.
I’ve always said real forensics and expert testimony trumps phony claims and quotes every time.
BUSTER says: Jason is a shameless liar because it would be impossible for the vomit at the Samarkand to only be dry vomit, as he says, while ambulance man Suau described it as being a big “pool”…The totally dry vomit that Jason is trolling could never be described as a “pool”, that obviously connotes a significant liquid content…It is obvious that Jason is just taunting us with idiotic denial, but any rational, intelligent, honest person who reads this can see we’ve made our case…It’s probably a mistake to continue answering the unfiltered troll Jason…
JASON says: More word play games again. A “pool” does not mean “wine” no matter how hard you try. If there were bottles of wine as you claim he ambulance men would have stated that in their testimony. They witnessed brown vomit not “red wine”.
And again, Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality continues to accuse others of that which he is guilty of, as we see with this……
Jason says “Bob Brown clearly said “There was no revival possible.”
That means no work was done, idiot, besides the “formality” that Bannister and Siefert stated.
“Swatter” still doesn’t understand what this means either.”
Guess again. I understand that it means Jason has no legit answer for the fact that the hospital record says it was 30 minutes from the time Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots at 11:45AM until 12:15PM when they stopped working on Jimi and declared him deceased, as well as the fact that if there was no work done on Jimi, then he would have been declared deceased much sooner than 12:15PM.
Jason says “No doctor is going to do extensive work on a cold dead blue body with no circulation that’s been dead for hours, you idiot. There would be no point. And like a moron, you think all this extensive work was done on a cold dead body that’s been dead for hours. Readers are laughing their heads off like I am.”
Guess again. It has been documented that such was done with both Elvis Presley and Brian Epstein. You can read about Elvis here:
https://elvisdaily.com/2016/08/15/elvis-presleys-last-hours-august-16-1977/
The doctors at St. Mary Abbots had no knowledge of how long Jimi had been in the state that he was so they worked on him for a half hour clearing his airways and trying to resuscitate him & this was the “mere formality” Dr. Bannister was making reference to.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality has no testimony or credible reference sources to back any of his self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass.
So this moron uses another person Elvis Presley as an example.
Hendrix was dead on arrival and Brown said there was no revival.
You are an idiot.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says…
“So this moron uses another person Elvis Presley as an example.
Hendrix was dead on arrival and Brown said there was no revival.
You are an idiot.”
Who was the idiot that said ““No doctor is going to do extensive work on a cold dead blue body with no circulation that’s been dead for hours, you idiot. There would be no point. And like a moron, you think all this extensive work was done on a cold dead body that’s been dead for hours.”?? Why that would be Jason, who’s obviously puked out about his statement getting refuted by the reference to Elvis Presley, because it shows that the ‘idiocy’ is all on Jason’s side & proves his claim to be completely false.
Jason says “Readers are laughing their heads off like I am.”
And many more readers are laughing harder even still about Jason being referred to as a lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality — because they know that the description fits Jason like a glove.
Spot on, Buster….
It’s laughable how Jason deludes himself into thinking his self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass overturns the testimonies of the people that were there at that time. Such as this………
Jason says: “There is no testimony of any red wine witnessed at the flat. You two wine trolls keep claiming gallons of red wine that was never witnessed.”
That’s a blatant lie. Nobody has referred to “gallons of wine”, except Jason. Monika told both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died. No testimony has ever been given by anybody saying that they didn’t see any traces of red wine at the Samarkand flat. Jason can’t answer the question of “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink?”, so Jason has to pull this self-decreed fabrication out of his ass….
Jason says: “Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi.”
Jason has no reference source or credible testimony from anyone to back this up. Jason clearly pulls this self-decreed fabrication out of his ass. Common sense & logic tells anybody that Dr. Brown did see the wine — hence his reference of “too much to drink”, as there is no other logical explanation for Dr. Brown to make such a reference.
And then we have this laughable BS spewed by Jason……
Jason says “Doctor Bob Brown said no work was done on Jimi. Siefert said he worked on Jimi for a few minutes. Bannister later admitted it was “merely a formality”.
So, all 3 doctors said at some point there was no wine removal or half hour wine surging resuscitation attempts.”
1) Dr. Brown didn’t say that no work was done on Jimi. What he said was “there was nothing to be done” — meaning that they couldn’t save Jimi’s life. The fact is, If nothing was done, as Jason tries to decree, then Jimi would have been declared dead much sooner than 12:15PM.
2) As for Siefert, just exactly how long is a “few minutes”? The hospital record says it was 30 minutes from the time Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots at 11:45AM until 12:15PM when they stopped working on Jimi and declared him deceased.
3) As for Bannister, Jason is clearly providing one of his usual lying misquotes, as what Bannister said was …
“On his admission, he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heart beat and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality, an attempt we would perform on any patient in such condition. His mucous membranes in the larynx and pharynx were completely cyanosed and prior to suction there was red wine and gastric contents exuding from his mouth. The very striking memory of this event in my mind was the considerable amount of alcohol in his pharynx and larynx, despite suction,and it was obvious that he had drowned in his own gastric contents.”
Jason lies when he says that “all 3 doctors said at some point there was no wine removal or half hour wine surging resuscitation attempts”. Bannister has never said or even remotely implied any such thing & neither have the other two. Jason just takes what is said and rips it out of context.
For anyone out there wondering why Jason keeps getting referred to as a lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality………..well, there is your answer.
Moron wine troll sidekick “swatter” lying and playing more word games.
Bob Brown clearly said “There was no revival possible.”
That means no work was done, idiot, besides the “formality” that Bannister and Siefert stated.
“Swatter” still doesn’t understand what this means either.
“The body was cold, there we no signs of circulation and my overall impression was he’d been dead for several hours. He was completely cold. I personally think he died long before. He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of somebody who had been dead for some time.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
No doctor is going to do extensive work on a cold dead blue body with no circulation that’s been dead for hours, you idiot. There would be no point. And like a moron, you think all this extensive work was done on a cold dead body that’s been dead for hours. Readers are laughing their heads off like I am.
Keep posting your ignorance!
.
FLYSWATTER says:: 1) Dr. Brown didn’t say that no work was done on Jimi. What he said was “there was nothing to be done” — meaning that they couldn’t save Jimi’s life. The fact is, If nothing was done, as Jason tries to decree, then Jimi would have been declared dead much sooner than 12:15PM.
JASON says: Bob Brown clearly said “There was no revival possible.”
You are lying and making up stories.as usual to promote your destroyed wine hoax. You are really going to enjoy my Brown piece I’m about to post. Enjoy!
FLYSWATTER says: That’s a blatant lie. Nobody has referred to “gallons of wine”, except Jason. Monika told both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died. No testimony has ever been given by anybody saying that they didn’t see any traces of red wine at the Samarkand flat. Jason can’t answer the question of “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink?”, so Jason has to pull this self-decreed fabrication out of his ass….
JASON says: So, now this idiot “swatter” wants to claim “traces of wine” now after he and his wine hoaxing clown pal Buster claimed a “massive” wine drowning with pure wine spilled all over the bed and Jimi? These wine trolls are way too much.
As you claim now “traces” what happened to all your “5 bottles of wine” you claimed? John Saua and Reginal Jones sure didn’t see any “pure red wine” anywhere at the flat. They witnessed only brown vomit. So, where is all the “pure red wine” that was spilled all over the bed and clothes Junior wine hoxer? Got any answers for that?
Let’s have a look at this quote from your wine hoaxing pal Buster who claimed Jimi was drowned in “gallons of spilled pure wine”. all over the bed.
BUSTER says: However the murder scene had gallons of spilled pure wine on the bed and clothes as well as a scarf around Jimi’s neck and what Bannister estimated to be “a half bottle of wine saturating his hair alone”. Since you can’t vomit out pure wine this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder.
JASON says: Your hoaxing pal said “gallons of wine” which is why I’ve been it stating it in my posts. So, where is all the spilled “pure red wine on the bed ” at Junior wine hoaxer? Saua and Jones never saw it at the death scene. How can it magically appear for Bannister in 1992 when there was no wine at the flat in 1970?
“Waterboarding murder”? Where? Officer Ian Smith never witnessed this “waterboarding murder” . Neither did John Saua or Reginal Jones. Where was it Junior wine hoaxer?
You want to claim traces of wine now when this idiot claimed bottles and gallon of pure wine before? You wine trolls are ridiculous..
Also, Buster is clearly lying perpetrating a hoax since ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua never saw “spilled pure wine” on the bed or Jimi’s clothes. They would have easily testified to that if pure wine was on the bed. Both men only witnessed brown vomit.
Moron “swatter” doesn’t understand that Hendrix was drinking wine all evening at Harvey’s, with Monika, and at Kameron’s party. Brown said he had a ‘bit’ too much to drink. That was his ‘bit’ too much. Brown never stated Hendrix was “flooded with wine”.
As for the Doctors, all said at one point it was either a formality or a revival was not possible. And this idiot still wants to argue with me about it. He just embarrassed himself once again. Thanks for that. Keep it up “pig man”!
“On his admission, he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heart beat and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality” – Ex Doctor Bannister
“Jimi was rushed into the resuscitation room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes, he
was dead.” – Doctor Siefert
“There was no revival possible”.- Doctor Brown
And Buster, we have Jason, in his desperation, making things up……
“JASON says: The “good Doctor Bannister” is not a good doctor. Ex Doctor Bannister was convicted for 3 counts of fraudulent conduct in 1992 and was struck off the medical register for fraudulent conduct. This man lost his medical license due to fraud. This is the man Buster holds in “high esteem” who has lied repeatedly making phony claims. Doctor Bob Brown refutes Bannister. He never witnessed any wine and doesn’t believe Jimi was “murdered”. You believe in a fraud and are stuck with your phony claims.Your foul language is terrible.
Let me remind you, that both John Saua and Reginal Jones refute Bannister cuz they never ever witnessed Jimi Hendrix soaked in wine. They only witnessed brown vomit.”
I’ve read all the documentation regarding Bannister’s de-registration case & it clearly states that he was struck off for BILLING ERRORS. Nowhere does it state that he was struck off the medical register for fraudulent testimony regarding the medical condition of one of his patients.
Bob Brown does not refute Bannister’s claim of Jimi being drowned in wine. The fact that Dr. Brown makes reference of Jimi having anything to drink, tells anybody out there in the world that he’s giving credence to Bannister’s claim.
And Jason’s claim of “Let me remind you, that both John Saua and Reginal Jones refute Bannister cuz they never ever witnessed Jimi Hendrix soaked in wine. They only witnessed brown vomit” doesn’t remind anyone of anything, except that Jason can only pull self-decreed fabrications out of his ass to support his phony narratives.
Bob Brown never said Hendrix was ever drowned in wine, moron.
All he said was Hendrix had a ‘bit’ too much to drink and died inhaling vomit”.
You are desperate wine troll. You lost you phony wine claim.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says…
“So, now this idiot “swatter” wants to claim “traces of wine” now after he and his wine hoaxing clown pal Buster claimed a “massive” wine drowning with pure wine spilled all over the bed and Jimi? These wine trolls are way too much.
As you claim now “traces” what happened to all your “5 bottles of wine” you claimed? John Saua and Reginal Jones sure didn’t see any “pure red wine” anywhere at the flat. They witnessed only brown vomit. So, where is all the “pure red wine” that was spilled all over the bed and clothes Junior wine hoxer? Got any answers for that?”
But of course there are answers. Jason employs his usual semantic rubbish and little girlish word games with his statement of “wants to claim “traces of wine” now after he and his wine hoaxing clown pal Buster claimed a “massive” wine drowning.” What was said was “No testimony has ever been given by anybody saying that they didn’t see any traces of red wine at the Samarkand flat” which doesn’t constitute anybody implying one volume amount versus another. I can just as easily have said “No testimony has ever been given by anybody saying that they didn’t see any red wine at the Samarkand flat”. What’s the difference? None, really — just semantic rubbish that Jason pulls out of his ass playing his little girlish word games.
As for the ambulance men, they never used the phrases “vomit only” or “only vomit” in their statements — in fact they never used the word “only”, at all. We only have Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality , using the word “only”, and there are no credible reference sources to back up his claim of “vomit only”. It’s just a self-decreed fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says…
“Bob Brown never said Hendrix was ever drowned in wine, moron.
All he said was Hendrix had a ‘bit’ too much to drink and died inhaling vomit”.”
Nobody ever stated that Bob Brown said Hendrix was drowned in wine. Jason is pulling that implication out of his own ass (which is his only source for just about everything he posts).
What was said was “The fact that Dr. Brown makes reference of Jimi having anything to drink, tells anybody out there in the world that he’s giving credence to Bannister’s claim.” — which means Dr. Brown is giving credence to the wine that Bannister claimed drowned Jimi to death. Nice try with ripping things out of context, but Jason fails.
Jason says “You are desperate wine troll. You lost you phony wine claim.”
Keep dreaming, shitball. We have the testimonies of Dr. Bannister, Dr. Seifert, Dr. Brown, and Dr. Thurston making reference to wine, plus Monika telling both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died — which over-rules any and all of Jason’s self-decrees.
Wine hoaxing Junior troll “pig man flyswatter” still playing word games holding out a glimmer of hope for his “imaginary wine” that never existed.
The ambulance men never witnessed “pure spilled wine” on the bed and pillows like your hoaxing clown Buster claimed. They only witnessed brown vomit. If they saw all that “red wine” they would have said so in their testimony, moron. There was no “spilled pure wine”. Hendrix had dry vomit. Brown vomit was on the pillows, not red wine. There was no throat flooded full of wine like that idiot Buster was lying about.
It’s fun watching you cry for wine that was never there.
Keep posting and embarrassing yourself. The readers are all laughing at you.
FLYSATTER says: Keep dreaming, shitball. We have the testimonies of Dr. Bannister, Dr. Seifert, Dr. Brown, and Dr. Thurston making reference to wine, plus Monika telling both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died — which over-rules any and all of Jason’s self-decrees.
This moron wine troll “pig man” doesn’t give up. LOL
“Pig Man” believes a liar like Sharon Lawrence who was never at the Hendrix death scene overrules the expert witness testimony of John Saua and Reginal Jones. LOL
Keep hanging on to that desperation dude!
So, you rely on phony “authors” to tell you what happened decades later. The ambulance men were there on the actual morning Hendrix was dead. They witnessed the death scene. These “authors” did not. The ambulance men weren’t there to make money off books. The “authors” were.
Sharon Lawrence said Jimi committed suicide with pills. Do you believe that “Pig Man”? So, her one bottle of wine account doesn’t matter since she already stated Hendrix killed himself with pills. That ends your phony wine claim.
Sharon Lawrence who lied about where Jimi was born in her book. Said Jimi committed suicide with pills, made up fake quotes about his mother just like she did with Thurston. Go ahead and believe a liar. The reading public sure doesn’t believe it.
Doctor Brown never witnessed any wine on Hendrix.
Dr. Thurston never gave any “testimony” about wine..Sharon Lawrence made up a fake quote about Thurston in her book.
Here’s Dr Thurston’s testimony “pig man”
“The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication, but there is no evidence as to intention to commit suicide” – Dr. Thurston
So, Dr. Thurston in his real testimony says nothing about wine and he refutes the liar Sharon Lawrence who said Jimi committed suicide. And you believe her? You are an idiot “pig man”.He also refutes your phony wine claim.
Know who else refutes you too? Yes, Doctor Bob Brown
“He’d had a bit too much to drink and whatever else and had inhaled vomitus.” – Doctor Bob Brown
Bob Brown says Jimi died from an inhalation of vomit like Thurston declared on Jimi’s official autopsy report.
How do you like them apples?
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says…
“Wine hoaxing Junior troll “pig man flyswatter” still playing word games holding out a glimmer of hope for his “imaginary wine” that never existed.”
And again…We have the testimonies of Dr. Bannister, Dr. Seifert, Dr. Brown, and Dr. Thurston making reference to wine, plus Monika telling both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died — which over-rules any and all of Jason’s self-decrees.
These people were there & Jason was not. Simple as that.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says…
“The ambulance men never witnessed “pure spilled wine” on the bed and pillows like your hoaxing clown Buster claimed. They only witnessed brown vomit. If they saw all that “red wine” they would have said so in their testimony, moron. There was no “spilled pure wine”. Hendrix had dry vomit. Brown vomit was on the pillows, not red wine. There was no throat flooded full of wine like that idiot Buster was lying about.”
No credible reference sources to back this up — just more self-decrees. Doesn’t answer the question of “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink?”, and no it wasn’t any wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s as the autopsy revealed a blood alcohol content of .005%, meaning that any wine that Jimi drank at either of those two places was long digested and gone — meaning there is no way Dr. Brown could be referencing wine that may have been drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s. What was Jason saying about being a moron (self-description of Jason, obviously)? Ambulance men were never asked directly about red wine, nor did they state anywhere that they didn’t see it. If Dr. Brown saw it, then they saw it — simple as that, and none of Jason’s self-decrees gets around that.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says…
“It’s fun watching you cry for wine that was never there.”
Rest assured it’s even more fun for me watching Jason wallow in his own mire of denial of reality & conning nobody but himself into thinking his self-decrees automatically overturns the testimonies of multiple people that were there.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says…
“Keep posting and embarrassing yourself. The readers are all laughing at you.”
Jason is quite correct — only he’s talking to himself there. By all means, Jason can keep posting his long-winded blather chock-filled with self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass, so that the readers can keep laughing him.
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says…
“Keep hanging on to that desperation dude!”
Let’s illustrate where the desperation really is at. First we have this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 3:20 am
Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix. Brown only said he had a “bit too much to drink”.
And next we have this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:04 pm
We all know Hendrix was drinking wine during the evening at Harvey’s flat. He had more wine with Monika before he took a bath and wrote his final poem “The Story of Life”. Then he had more wine at Kameron’s party when he ingested a powerful amphetamine and ate a rice meal. This is the ‘bit ‘ too much Brown was talking about. Brown never said Hendrix was ‘drowned in wine’ like these wine hoaxers claim.
Jason is first claiming that “Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix” and then same-day he is claiming that the wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s and Cameron’s was the “bit too much Brown was talking about”. Of course, as stated earlier — the autopsy revealed a blood alcohol content of .005%, meaning that any wine that Jimi drank at either of those two places was long digested and gone — meaning there is no way Dr. Brown could be referencing wine that may have been drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s.
Can’t have it both ways — either Brown saw the wine or he didn’t (Dr. Brown saw it). Nice job by Jason tripping over his own tongue in his desperation & anyone can see that if a brain surgeon were to operate on Jason’s head and enter his skull that the surgeon would find the same substance that’s located in Jason’s large intestine — namely a large quantity of STOOL !!
Jason says ”How do you like them apples?”
Looks like Jason’s apples are full of worms.
Pig man is a forensic analysis expert now. LOL. Brown said Hendrix inhaled vomit. Never said wine.
Jason says:
“Pig man is a forensic analysis expert now. LOL. Brown said Hendrix inhaled vomit. Never said wine.”
TRANSLATED: Jason is only giving a self-description when he uses the term “pig man”, because it really applies to nobody but himself. Jason also knows the forensic analysis that was stated regarding the .005% blood alcohol content, totally trashes his theory of Dr. Brown seeing “a bit too much to drink” as a result of whatever wine Jimi may have drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s (and incidentally, there is no testimony given by anybody that Jimi consumed any wine at Cameron’s).
As for the statement of “Brown said Hendrix inhaled vomit. Never said wine.” — that’s already known & acknowledged, Captain Obvious. The question of “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink, if there was no wine, as Jason has decreed?” still stands unanswered by Jason — because he can’t answer it.
Brown said that 40 years later, moron. He never said “Jimi was covered in wine” and said Jimi died of a drug overdose not a “wine drowning”.
It’s pretty obvious what the cause of death was in Jimi’s case: inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication as observed by the coroner and stated on the death certificate. No where, on any official record, does it state that Jimi died as a result of ingesting copious amounts of wine. The residual wine came from the two parties Jimi attended previously that evening/morning. It is simply idiotic to suggest that the doctors would have attempted an half hour resuscitation on someone who had been dead for some time as the doctors all attested to. All the doctors stated that Jimi was blue and cold and flatlined at the hospital and there was nothing they could do for him. The ambulance officers both said the same thing that Jimi was dead at the Samarkand and not unconscious. The pool of vomit only means that there was matter near by and the large pool means that Jimi was covered with it along with the bedding. The does not mean it was liquid in nature because if it was then Jimi would not have had the tell tail signs of someone who had been dead for hours. Kathy’s subsequent investigation proved that the ambulance was not called immediately by Monika instead she made several phone calls that morning to various people and delayed calling the ambulance. Buster has changed the story from Jimi being covered in wine to having ingested the wine but he fails to disclose who the murderer was since we already know Michael Jeffrey was in Spain. He can’t use that scenario anymore because Wright’s book was a total fabrication along with Albert Allen dumb disclosure. Yet Buster calls Dr. Bannister the “good doctor” even though he was charged with fraud and deregistered would you then trust anything Buster says here. He is clearly giving alternative fantastical scenarios to original proven one.
Buster has a lot of explaining to do after he made his phony Hendrix “massive wine drowning” claims that turned out to be fraudulent.
Buster always stated Jimi Hendrix was soaked and drowned in “red wine”. Now he’s trying to claim that “brown vomit” is “red wine”. Buster never said that before so he’s changing his story. Brown vomit is not “red wine” like Buster is pathetically trying to claim. Does Buster want to claim “brown vomit” or “red wine”? It can’t be both since before he was only talking about red wine and not brown vomit.
Buster cannot now try to claim that “brown vomit” means “red wine” after he said Jimi was physically drowned in “red wine” with gallons of red wine soaking the bed and his body. The ambulance men would have witnessed gallons of “red wine” and testified to it if all that “red wine” was there. Both men never described a physical wine drowning scene like Buster said. Both men described a vomit scene from a reaction to a drug overdose. This proves the physical “red wine” drowning never happened since no man described a physical “red wine” drowning scene.
Wine hoaxers make a deliberate attempt to emphasize extraordinary amounts of “red wine” they say was covering Hendrix and “red wine” that was inside him. They say Jimi was filled up to full capacity inside with ” red wine” and his body soaked and completely covered in “red wine”. Both ambulance men witnessed the death scene and never viewed his body soaked or covered in red wine. They never witnessed Jimi filled up to full capacity inside with wine since they both only witnessed dry vomit. Jones testified to Hendrix being only covered in vomit and not wine. Jimi can’t be filled up to full capacity with wine when dry vomit all the way down his throat was only witnessed. This means Jimi was never filled up to full capacity with “red wine” like Buster was claiming.
Jimi can’t be covered and soaked in extraordinary amounts of “red wine” when only brown vomit was witnessed. Buster now can’t change his claim to “brown vomit” is “red wine” when both ambulance men never witnessed all this massive wine Buster talks about. Buster always said “red wine” and now he can’t change his story to “brown vomit” to still claim wine. That doesn’t work and it is very desperate and pathetic. But most of all it’s impossible. Buster can’t use this new phony claim. He is stuck with his debunked physical wine drowning claim that Reginal Jones and John Saua never witnessed at the Hendrix death scene. Too bad for him. That’s what he gets for over exaggerating his phony wine claims like a moron. Sooner or later it was bound to catch up with him and now it finally did.
How does Buster explain no physical wine drowning at the flat after this is all he talked about?
How does Buster explain that Jimi was never physically drowned and soaked in wine when both ambulance men never witnessed red wine?
How does Buster explain no massive amounts of red wine witnessed on the bed, blankets, and pillows?
How does Buster explain brown vomit witnessed by ambulance men on the pillows when Buster claims “red wine” was soaked in gallons on the pillows?
How does Buster expiain dry vomit all the way down Jimi’s throat witnessed by ambulance men when Buster says Jimi was filled up to full capacity with wine way past his throat spilling out of his mouth in an “overkill”?
Red wine would be obvious to the ambulance men soaking the bed and pillows. They witnessed no red wine on the pillows. Just brown vomit. Buster has been refuted.
Red wine would be obvious soaking Jimi in a physical wine drowning. The ambulance men only witnessed brown vomit. Buster has been refuted.
Is Buster going to double down on his phony wine claim or is he going to admit he has been refuted by expert witness testimony and science? We shall see.
Hi Jason. If Jimi had died of the wine then this is all that anyone would have witnessed and the only thing Jimi would have vomited up. The thing that killed Jimi was the Vesparax in his system and not the red wine; the coroner obviously witnessed only the vomit and then wrote his report. This tallies with what the ambulance officers saw and reported. You cannot die initially from that amount of red wine and then have the cause of death on the certificate as a secondary cause being the barbiturate level. If Monika only had one bottle of red wine at the Samarkand then where did Bannister come up with the five bottles of red wine? Or is it simply that Jimi swallowed the pills with the red wine, and this being a lethal combination, caused a coughing fit chocking Jimi to death fully clothed on top of the bed. What these two morons are forgetting is that Jimi died of high dosage of barbiturates and not copious amounts of red wine. They are suggesting that the coroner, a highly experienced expert , did not do a thorough job in his examination of Jimi and failed to detect the wine and made a mistake with his diagnosis. The ambulance officers would also not have mistaken vomit for red wine having witnessed many overdoses at the time. The death certificate would have stated copious amounts of red wine and drowning in red wine if this was really the cause of death. You simply cannot witness excessive amounts of red wine on anyone and then ignore it and say it never occurred or happened. It’s obvious this amount of red wine was never witnessed otherwise it would have been the primary cause of death.
Hi Ivana,
You are absolutely correct. Red wine would have been clearly visible and obvious to the ambulance men and the police. Buster the wine hoaxer claimed “pure red wine” was spilled and poured all over the bed, pillows, and on Jimi. That’s not what the ambulance men witnessed with only brown vomit on the pillows. So, why would Buster make up these fraudulent lies? .Did he not know that expert witnesses would refute him? No pure red wine was ever witnessed by the ambulance men.
So, Buster claimed 5 bottles of wine inside Hendrix plus a lot more drowning him and the bed. Now Buster wants to whine about a bottle of wine that was already there so he can still claim wine. Totally pathetic.Then his moron sidekick “pig man flyswatter” is crying about “traces of wine”. This is so freaking hilarious!
So, the wine trolls started out with bottles of wine, then it became a bottle of wine, and now it’s traces of wine. LOL
Don’t forget Buster invented the phony “hard cork of vomit” claim that destroys his original flooded throat full of wine claim.
When they are lying with their phony claims they got tripped up and screwed up their phony theories. Buster should have known better not to make these fake claims when the actual truth exists. Now he can suffer the shame and be angry. Big “foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix” LOL
Since the the wine hoaxers can only now claim one bottle of wine, which most was already consumed earlier, where does Fraud Bannister and the wine hoaxers get their 5 bottles? How does Jimi become magically drowned and flooded with wine?
They are true morons who can’t account for all the bogus wine they claim. Bob Brown never witnessed Jimi drowned in wine. He also said Jimi inhaled vomit and no revival was possible. So that destroys their phony claims as well since a doctor confirmed it too. They kept talking about Brown too. LOL
No wine witnessed at the flat by ambulance men or by Brown at the hospital. That ends their hoax. But i know they will still peddle it anyway but the readers are aware it’s a total hoax.
I just posted a piece about Doctor Bob Brown and the final part 3 of the ambulance and police men series. Enjoy!
As Buster changes each fake claim from one post to the next, we attempt to address this situation to get some clarification on Buster’s muddled posts.
It’s really hard to keep up with Buster’s phony claims since he changes them in every other comment each time it suits his needs to promote his fake narrative. The readers are aware of this as well and probably would like some clarification on which official claim Buster wants to use.
The problem for Buster is, each time he switches his claim he contradicts his original claim. Since his new claim is fake, he ultimately proves his original claim is fake as well. Then Buster is reduced to just parroting two fake claims and nobody takes him seriously. Hopefully, we can help Buster out and make him decide on which official claim he wants to go with.
It’s also hard for anybody to have an honest discussion with a person who changes claims on purpose and is not being serious. This is also known as trolling. So, to prevent Buster from trolling and switching his claims every post, we seek clarification from Buster on which claim Buster truly wants to stick with.
So, the first order of business is “Buster’s fake wine drowning claim”. Buster is really confused on this one. He never knows which fake claim will work out best for him. Buster switches with ease between a “forced wine drowning” or Jimi being “incapacitated with pills first” and no “forced wine drowning”. Take a look at the beauties.
BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
BUSTER says: October 15, 2019
When Monika told that to Sharon Lawrence she was making up an excuse for wine she knew was used to murder Jimi and had spilled over on to him when it was being forced down his throat.
We all can see what we are up against here. Either it’s a “forced wine drowning” or not a “forced wine drowning” and Buster switches them whenever it suits his phony narrative.
So, we the people ask Buster for official clarification on which official phony claim he will only use.
Buster, are you going to go with your original claim that supports Tappy Wright and claim a “forced wine drowning” or are you going to go with your brand new fake claim that discredits your original claim stating that “Jimi was incapacitated with pills first” and “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”?
You can only choose one Buster and not contradict yourself switching back and forth between the two.
Next up on the list is Buster’s phony “What’s inside Jimi’s throat claim”. This is a real humdinger folks. Take a gander at this.
“BUSTER says: Jimi was drowned in at least 5 bottles of wine He said when he opened Jimi’s mouth to resuscitate him that there was wine up to the throat…A clever detective would see that the amount of wine was wine that was poured in to Jimi until he could hold no more…This is called “overkill” in criminology to make sure the job was done…That same smart detective would realize that for wine to be up to the mouth would mean everything beneath it was flooded and that the volume of that flooding would be about 5 bottles of wine.”
“BUSTER says: The ambulance attendants told Kathy that it was because their equipment could not penetrate that hard plug of vomit that they decided to get Jimi to the hospital so they could access equipment that could. The truth is the hard plug of vomit that the ambulance men couldn’t penetrate at the Samarkand was broken through at St Mary’s and below it was wine that flooded Jimi’s stomach and lungs up to the throat…The hard vomit was like a cork and when they unplugged it the wine was beneath.”
JASON says: Buster sure outdid himself on these ones.
Buster has always told us Jimi had “5 bottles of wine” forced inside of him filled up to full capacity going up way past his throat. Buster said this was an “overkill” making sure to “get the job done”. So, Buster told us that Jimi had a throat full of liquid wine filled full all the way down to his stomach. Filled full of wine like a waterbed would slosh. Doesn’t this sound ridiculous? Probably why Buster changed this phony claim. And I don’t blame him for that.
Then to Buster’s dismay, he read the testimony of ambulance man John Saua. Saua testified that he only witnessed dry vomit all the way down Jimi’s throat. Buster immediately knew he was screwed with his phony “throat full of liquid wine” claim so he decided to come up something even more absurd than his “throat full of liquid wine” claim. Buster invented a fake “hard plug of vomit” in Jimi’s throat which prevented the ambulance men from witnessing all the gallons of wine sloshing inside Jimi. Buster thought he was clever but it turns out this new phony ridiculous claim blew up right in his face.
John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed any “hard plug of vomit” in Jimi’s throat. They never witnessed a “throat full of liquid wine” either. So, both of Buster’s phony claims are debunked right off the bat and Buster is left with egg on his face.
Also, medical science refutes Buster’s phony claims. There is no possible way to have a “throat full of liquid wine” as Buster told us and then have a dry throat with “a hard plug of vomit”. The “throat full of liquid wine” flooding would prevent a “hard plug of vomit” from ever forming. Readers are nodding their heads in agreement. So, both of Buster’s phony claims are as phony as a 3 dollar bill. The real testimony from John Saua was “Jimi had dry vomit all the way down his throat”. No liquid wine or hard plugs of vomit were ever witnessed. Buster wasn’t nearly as clever as he thought.
So, we the people say to Buster that he should abandon both of these phony claims since they are already refuted and contradict each other. Buster should go with a brand new phony claim instead.
But if Buster wants to continue with this charade, he can only choose one phony debunked claim.
Buster, are you going to roll the dice and choose between your original claim of a “throat full of liquid wine” or the new recent claim of the fake “hard plug of vomit” that was never witnessed by John Saua? Saua never witnessed the “throat full of liquid wine” either so I say you are in a real quandary here.
So Buster, are you going with the “forced wine drowning” or the “non forced wine drowning”?
Are you going with the “throat full of liquid wine” or the “hard plug of vomit”?
Let us all know.
Thanks.
(Hello readers! These wine troll hoaxers sure are something else. Pathetically and desperately still trying to make their phony wine claims. They’ve made all these bogus wine claims and now that they have been exposed as frauds, they are spinning out of control using anything they can to claim wine. Buster the wine hoaxing clown is a liar when he continues to say I’ve never spoken about Doctor Bob Brown. I’ve posted an article about Brown last month and wrote about him. But Buster the clown continues to lie. Well, the bad news for him ( and his junior wine clown sidekick) is that I’m going to write about Doctor Bob Brown again which will further destroy his phony wine claims. Are you ready? I am. Let’s go destroy their phony wine claims again!)
“Exposing More Of The Fake Wine Claims Of Wine Hoaxing Trolls”
By Jason
Wine trolls continue to take Doctor Bob Brown’s comments out of context trying to use him for their phony wine hoax. Doctor Brown gave an interview with The Courier Mail in June of 2012, an Australian publication.
Brown first stated that “Hendrix had been dead for hours” which refutes Buster the clown and Fraud Bannister claims of half hour wine surging resuscitation attempts. What would be the point of these attempts when Hendrix was already dead for hours? Also, we know from Reginal Jones and John Saua that they witnessed no wine flooded inside Hendrix. So, they easily refute Bannister who is the only person to make this phony claim.
“He had been dead for some hours,” Senator Brown said.
Doctor Brown who was a Senator, has confirmed that Hendrix was dead for hours. Brown corroborates what John Saua, Reginal Jones, and Officer Ian Smith testified to.
Wine hoaxers take what Brown said out of context deliberately to further their phony wine murder hoax. These wine hoaxers keep stating that Bob Brown said Hendrix had “too much to drink” and use that out of context quote by him to give credibility to Bannister’s fraudulent claims. Bob Brown never said “Hendrix had too much to drink”. Brown said “He had a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. That is a completely different quote they take out of context which means something totally different.
A ‘bit’ means nothing which is not too much. Wine hoaxers use word games to make their phony wine claim.
We all know Hendrix was drinking wine during the evening at Harvey’s flat. He had more wine with Monika before he took a bath and wrote his final poem “The Story of Life”. Then he had more wine at Kameron’s party when he ingested a powerful amphetamine and ate a rice meal. This is the ‘bit ‘ too much Brown was talking about. Brown never said Hendrix was ‘drowned in wine’ like these wine hoaxers claim.
“He’d had a bit too much to drink and whatever else and had inhaled vomitus.” – Doctor Bob Brown
Bob Brown clearly states a ‘bit’. This is far different than what wine hoaxers try to tell you. Now comes the most important part of what Brown states.
Brown then states that Jimi Hendrix inhaled vomit and died just like the official record states. Brown never says that Hendrix was “drowned in wine” like Fraud Bannister and these wine trolls claim.
The wine trolls claim a ‘wine drowning’ killed Hendrix. Doctor Brown refutes the wine trolls and confirms the official record and what I’ve been saying all along. Brown clearly states that Jimi Hendrix died from inhaling vomit and not drowning in wine. Brown uses the medical term ‘vomitus’ to state Hendrix inhaled vomit just like the record states. That is a very clear statement that wine trolls can’t refute.
So, we have ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones clearly stating that they witnessed only vomit on Hendrix’s body and dry vomit in his mouth and down his throat. They never said anything about wine on Hendrix or in his throat.
Now we have Doctor Bob Brown corroborating what both ambulance men said and what the official record states. Brown clearly says that Hendrix inhaled vomit and died from that as a result. That was from an overdose of drugs and not wine. Brown never mentioned a ‘wine drowning’ as the cause of Jimi Hendrix’s death like the wine trolls claimed. Brown refutes them on all counts.
Doctor Brown agrees with the official record as he stated Hendrix died from an inhalation of vomit. He never stated a wine drowning or mentioned wine. John Saua and Reginal Jones never said they witnessed wine but only vomit. So, now we have two ambulance men and an Officer at the flat who witnessed no wine. And now we have a doctor at the hospital who clearly stated Hendrix inhaled vomit and said nothing about wine.
Before and after vomit accounts refutes these wine trolls.
Buster the clown and his junior sidekick “swatter” should have not used Brown for his phony wine claims. Brown just destroyed their lies. They should have also not have lied when I already spoke of Brown earlier. Trolls gotta be trolls.
(Hey gang! We have entered the Final Part 3 of this amazing and historic series. I can’t say this is where we finally debunk the phony “Hendrix wine murder myth”, since we already have, but this is where the door is slammed shut on this nonsense once and for all. In this final Part 3, we will meet a very minor player, who plays the most important role in this entire saga. The player we will meet is Officer Ian Smith, who doesn’t have a lot to say, but what he does say, will put an end to the tin foil hat wine hoaxers phony wine claim. Also, in this final Part 3, we will preview some of the lies, confusion, and contradictions of one Ex Doctor Bannister. We will also have a look at the blatant lies, fraud, and the pure ignorance of the tin foil hat wine hoaxers. We should really thank our expert witnesses ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua who totally refuted the phony wine myth with their expert testimony in the first 2 parts of this series. They both witnessed the death scene and saw no visible wine anywhere. They only saw brown vomit on Hendrix and inside the room. Tin foil hat wine hoaxers don’t have much to say about that. Well, I’m ready to get started with this Final Part 3. So, make yourself comfortable and let’s get going with the final Part 3.)
“Debunking Bannister’s and Wine Hoaxers Phony Hendrix Wine Murder Myth : The Police Man Edition”
Part Three
By Jason
After the first 2 parts, what more could be left for an encore? Well, there is plenty more, and it will show the real evidence and the facts of that fateful morning on September 18, 1970. The tin foil hat wine hoaxers major goal is to drown out the real facts and in return shove their conspiracy garbage onto you where it’s all a bunch of phony quotes, claims, and outrageous stories too ridiculous to believe. That’s why it’s imperative to counteract their lies and myths, in which they have no evidence, and for us to report the truth with the actual events and testimony that can’t be refuted to stifle their fantasy fairy tales.
Before we begin, let’s all give a big round of applause to Kathy Etchingham. We should all be greatly indebted to Kathy Etchingham, for doing the hard work in acquiring this important testimony. If it wasn’t for her hard and painstaking work, we wouldn’t have had the testimony from our expert witnesses ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua. As well as our upcoming witness Officer Ian Smith. This is the superb hard work of Kathy who refutes Bannister’s and Tin foil hat wine hoaxers claims of wine. So, thank you Kathy, Hendrix fans everywhere toasts you with a glass of “Red, Red Wine”.
Our expert witnesses ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua were first on the scene to discover a dead Jimi Hendrix. Jimi was already dead on the bed inside the flat alone covered in vomit. They saw no wine anywhere like these fraudsters try to tell you. Their first part of business was to call the police and get an aspirator to use on Hendrix. The aspirator used by John Saua sucked out dry vomit from inside Jimi. Remember, there was no wine being sucked out or a phony “hard cork of vomit” inside Jimi’s throat like the con artists try to claim.
Now enter police officer Ian Smith who came to the flat to witness the death scene. Ian Smith was one of two police officers who served at Netting Dale police station. He saw nothing unusual at the flat that would warrant a crime of foul play. No massive wine drowning like tin foil hat wine hoaxers try to claim.
“We went to a basement flat at Landsdowne Crescent. The ambulance men were there, but Jimi was dead. It wasn’t very pleasant. They had to take some of the bedding and wrapped it around his body as there was a lot of mess. There was really nothing they could do for him. I watched them put him in the ambulance and go off.” – Officer Ian Smith
So, Officer Smith is the third corroborating expert witness to testify that Hendrix was already dead at the flat. Surprisingly enough, tin foil hat wine hoaxers try to suggest that Hendrix was still alive when he was taken to the hospital for “half hour resuscitation attempts”. Notice Ian Smith said nothing about wine either. He is a trained police man who would know a true crime scene when he saw one. He saw nothing suspicious that would warrant an investigation as a massive wine drowning would indicate. So, there goes the phony “cover up” conspiracy claim that Buster the clown parrots religiously.
Let’s go back to Smith’s testimony for a minute. He says a very key word that you need to focus on. Focus on this key word which is the last word at the end of the sentence below.
“They had to take some of the bedding and wrapped it around his body as there was a lot of mess.”
Officer Ian Smith says the word “mess”. The word “mess” obviously means vomit as a general term. So, who also used the word mess? Yeah, that’s right, Doctor Siefert.
“I vaguely remember the clothes being flamboyant, but not too well because that isn’t what you concentrate on, and there was a good bit of mess.” – Doctor Martin Siefert
So, both Smith and Siefert corroborate their testimony using the word “mess”, meaning that there was only vomit on Hendrix. Both men used the same word and never said anything about wine.
John Saua and Reginal Jones stated Hendrix was covered in vomit. And now you have a police man and Doctor confirming the same as well. So, three men at the flat saw vomit and a doctor at the hospital saw vomit. And this was the legitimate account of September 18, 1970 of what these men witnessed. Not the phony post 1992 claims that are conspiracy nonsense where they make imaginary wine the issue. So, 4 men saw vomit. Where does that leave Bannister who claims he saw wine in 1992? A lying fraud cuz he said nothing about wine either on 9/18/70.
We aren’t done with Officer Ian Smith just yet, since we have one more important piece of business to take care of that slams the door shut on the conspiracy theorists phony wine myth.
Kathy Etchingham asked Officer Smith a few questions but this one is the one that drives the stake through the heart of the tin foil hat wine hoaxers:
Question: “We’re you aware of the fact that was Jimi Hendrix?”
Ian Smith: “No, I hadn’t a clue who he was. We really answered a lot of calls like that in those days.”
So, Ladies and Gentlemen, Officer Ian Smith confirms without a doubt that this was a drug overdose when he specifically states “We really answered a lot of calls like that in those days.” Unless the tin foil hat wine hoaxers want to try and claim there were mass wine drownings happening all over in London in 1970. Drug overdoses were very common in London especially in Notting Hill, so Ian Smith, Reginal Jones and John Saua had a lot of experience with them. Even John Saua knew it was an overdose and took a vomit sample saying “He didn’t know what Hendrix had taken”.
John Saua confirmed it was an overdose and Ian Smith just made it official with his testimony. Officer Ian Smith specifically said “We answered a lot of calls like that in those days” which is in reference to a drug overdose, not a wine drowning. If it was anything close to resembling foul play, Officer Ian Smith would have sealed off the flat and made it a crime scene. Since it was a routine overdose as he stated, there would be no need for that. And then we have tin foil hat wine hoaxers claiming that there was this huge “cover up” from the British Government. Total tin foil hat idiots.
Don’t forget it was John Saua who rang for Officer Ian Smith from the ambulance to come to the flat. So, Saua recognized this as an overdose as well since he said he said “it looked like an overdose” in his testimony. So, all 3 men confirmed this was a drug overdose. Not one of these men said it was a wine drowning or a wine involved death. Officer Ian Smith seals the deal by stating “He received a lot of calls like that in those days.” Wine hoaxers can’t claim there were lots of calls for mass wine drownings in 1970. There were lots of calls for drug overdoses though in 1970 in Notting Hill.
So, first with the expert eye witness testimony of ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua, we saw that there was no wine on Hendrix or coming out of him. And then Officer Ian Smith, who shredded this whole phony wine conspiracy theory with his account of this being a routine drug overdose, we can finally slam the door on this made up “murder by wine” hoax that these conspiracy theorist wine hoaxers try to sell you.
Officer Ian Smith just slammed the door shut on these fraudsters who claim a wine drowning death. But we still have one more important piece of testimony that slams the door even harder. More you say? Yes, there is more. This comes once again from Ambulance Man Reginal Jones who was asked a question from Kathy Etchingham.
Question: “Did you sit him up in the ambulance?”
Reginal Jones: “Sit him up! No luv, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked.”
Reginal Jones has just confirmed that Jimi Hendrix choked. Reginal Jones’ testimony just proves once again that Jimi Hendrix choked and suffocated on his own vomit. Jones said nothing about wine or a wine drowning in his testimony. Wine hoaxers sure won’t like reading this, as it drives another nail in their conspiracy coffin. Their phony murder theory has been incinerated into ashes.
Bannister and the wine hoaxers all along have been claiming that Hendrix was drowned in red wine. Reginal Jones just confirmed to us that Jimi Hendrix choked on vomit like the official record states. Reginal Jones already confirmed he witnessed dry vomit inside Hendrix and now he’s confirmed he choked on the vomit. Reginal Jones never mentioned witnessing wine or a wine drowning in his testimony. This proves there was never wine or wine drowning in Jimi’s death as these wine hoaxers claim. Reginal Jones totally destroys those claims. This again proves there was no ‘imbibed wine’ in Hendrix that the fraud Sharon Lawrence wrote about in her fiction book. Thurston never talked about ‘imbibed wine’ cuz Hendrix choked on his own vomit like the official record states. Wine hoaxers have forever lost their phony claim. They tried, but like I always say, real forensic evidence and expert testimony will refute and debunk them every time.
Let’s also not forget what we just read from Officer Ian Smith who clearly stated that “He received a lot of calls like that in those days”. Officer Ian Smith was telling us it was a drug overdose as well, So, 3 professional men have confirmed they witnessed only vomit and have confirmed without a doubt that Jimi Hendrix was a casualty of a drug overdose like the official record states. Their testimony destroys all the frauds who claimed wine drowning. Those stories of wine were all far fetched and asinine. Only a true imbecile moron would believe any of that garbage. At least that nonsense has been finally been put to rest in the wine hoaxers boneyard.
There is no possible way these fraudsters can continue their phony Hendrix Murder Hoax after its been destroyed. We now move on with a preview of the tin foil hat wine hoaxers favorite fraud doctor, ex Doctor Bannister. This shady character ex Doctor Bannister “The Godfather of Wine” has made up many lies and contradictions including these beauties.
“Red wine was coming out of his nose and out of his mouth. It was horrific. The whole scene is very vivid, because you don’t often see people who have drowned in their own red wine.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
Sorry, but ex Doctor Fraud Bannister is clearly lying here. Reginal Jones saw no wine coming out of Jimi’s mouth or nose when he examined him at the flat. Jones also said Hendrix choked on his vomit. Also, John Saua never witnessed wine or sucked wine out of Hendrix with the aspirator. Officer Ian Smith was called for a drug overdose as he confirmed. These men saw Hendrix before Bannister did. Bannister made up his phony wine claims in 1992 decades later. These men are clearly credible and Fraud Bannister is not. Bannister was convicted for 3 counts of fraud in 1992 and lost his medical license. So Bannister is definitely not credible and he is again making another account of fraud.
“The body was cold, there we no signs of circulation and my overall impression was he’d been dead for several hours. He was completely cold. I personally think he died long before. He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of somebody who had been dead for some time.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
Then why would Fraud Bannister later claim he attempted a 20 minute resuscitation attempt on a man who’s been dead for several hours? A cold dead body will never be brought back to life. Bannister severely contradicted himself here.
“I think that he was naked” – Ex Doctor Bannister
No, Jimi was not naked, he was fully clothed confirmed by the ambulance men and Dr. Siefert. Bannister is failing to remember the actual details but has his lies down perfectly. We will soon revisit the fraudulent ex Doctor Bannister in my next series which will be dedicated all to him.
Finally, we take a look at these fraudulent wine hoaxers that peddle their conspiracy garbage on the internet. They have only one mission in mind. That is to spread as much misinformation as possible and to suppress the real documented evidence from being shown to the public. These fraudulent hoaxers blatantly lie making up phony accounts that never happened. Here are the comments of one tin foil hat troll wine hoaxer who fraudulently lies to push his phony debunked conspiracy theory.
“BUSTER says: You can’t have 5 bottles of wine inside you with only a trace blood alcohol content, like Jimi had, innocently…You won’t be able to find any other case with those forensic particulars…It’s proof of murder…Jimi was physically drowned with wine…He did not die from the pills.”
JASON says: Buster lies again about 5 bottles of wine. There was never 5 bottles of wine witnessed by any man at the flat. We all just read their testimony and they confirmed they only witnessed brown vomit and that Hendrix died from a drug overdose. No wine was ever witnessed or mentioned by any of these men. Yes, we won’t be able to find any case since there never was a Hendrix case. The real forensics never showed any wine. Buster the wine hoaxer troll is a horrible liar. Not one man at the flat ever witnessed Hendrix physically drowned in wine. This is a blatant lie. Then Buster lies again saying Hendrix didn’t die from pills. This is Buster’s deliberate attempt to suppress real evidence for his wine hoax. Officer Ian Smith and Reginal Jones confirmed Hendrix did die from pills. Buster the wine Hoaxer suppresses real evidence for his phony wine claims. Well, he won’t be able to do that anymore since his phony wine claim has been exposed as a fraud. There was no “proof of murder”, the experts refute that who were at the flat. These wine trolls have been exposed.
“BUSTER says: You can’t have 5 bottles of wine witnessed in your body by a medical doctor and only have the 5mg blood alcohol content Jimi registered at his autopsy.”
JASON says: Buster lies again about “5 bottles of wine”. 5 bottles of wine was never witnessed at the flat by anybody. The only “medical doctor” to claim this is Fraud Bannister who has been exposed as a fraud. Reginal Jones and John Saua never witnessed 5 bottles of wine. Doctor Bob Brown never witnessed a wine drowning either. Brown said Hendrix died from inhaling vomit just like Jones, Saua, and Smith testified to.
Buster is a true liar peddling wine hoaxing lies.
“BUSTER says: The only way you can possess those forensic particulars is by homicide where the victim was physically drowned in wine.”
JASON says: Wine hoaxing troll “Buster” continues to parrot this same horrible lie. Jimi Hendrix was not physically drowned in wine. Not one man at the flat ever witnessed a physical wine drowning. They never witnessed Hendrix soaked in wine or witnessed any wine coming out of Hendrix. There was no homicide as this liar peddles in his posts. He has been refuted by expert witnesses who were at the flat who never viewed any wine. Jimi Hendrix died from an accidental drug overdose as these witnesses confirmed.
“BUSTER says: Doctor Bannister, the attending St Mary Abott’s Resuscitation Room physician, came forward in 1992 to say he had witnessed lungs and stomach full of wine in Hendrix like he had never seen in his medical career and that instead of choking on vomit Jimi Hendrix had died from being drowned in red wine.”
JASON says: This wine hoaxer “Buster” still continues to push his lies. He suppresses real evidence and pushes his blatant lies on the reading public instead. It’s the good thing I’m here to refute him and expose his lies.
Fraud Bannister is a terrible liar and so are you. There was no “lungs and stomach full of wine”. We just read expert testimony from Ambulance men and a police man who never described anything like what you and Bannister claim. Bob Brown has refuted it too. Why do you continue to perpetrate fraud on the reading public?
Buster also fraudulently lies saying that Jimi Hendrix didn’t choke on vomit but “drowned in red wine”. Not one man witnessed Hendrix being “drowned in wine” at the flat. Let’s refer Buster the wine hoaxer to what ambulance man Reginal Jones said:
Reginal Jones: “Sit him up! No luv, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked.”
JASON says: Reginal Jones refutes this wine troll and makes perfectly clear that Hendrix choked to death on vomit. Jones never said a word about Hendrix being drowned in wine. Reginal Jones was there at the flat. Buster the Hoaxer was not. Reginal Jones refutes Bannister’s lies and the conspiracy sham perpetrated by Buster who was just proven to be a fraudulent liar once again.
“BUSTER says: you knew what you were talking about (which you obviously don’t) you would know that the ambulance attendants told Kathy that it was because their equipment could not penetrate that hard plug of vomit that they decided to get Jimi to the hospital so they could access equipment that could.”
JASON says: Here we go again with the old phony “hard plug of vomit” routine that this wine Hoaxer uses. The ambulance men never told Kathy anything about “a hard plug of vomit” This liar just made this up since he has no evidence for wine. Jimi was already dead so there would be no need to remove “a hard plug of vomit” Buster contradicts his own phony claim. This wine Hoaxer claims there was a “wine drowning” so no “hard plug of vomit” could ever form if Hendrix was filled up drowned in wine. So, this dumb wine troll just refuted and debunked his old and new phony claim. That’s what happens when you’re a liar.
“BUSTER says: The truth is the hard plug of vomit that the ambulance men couldn’t penetrate at the Samarkand was broken through at St Mary’s and below it was wine that flooded Jimi’s stomach and lungs up to the throat…The hard vomit was like a cork and when they unplugged it the wine was beneath.”
JASON says: Buster has no idea what the word ‘truth’ means. He blatantly lies about a fake “hard plug of vomit” and then claims all the wine gushed out like a geyser at the hospital. This is a load of crap since there was never any wine or plugs of vomit. This wine troll is an “authority” on making up fake stories and has no clue about the real evidence and account of Jimis death. This wine troll can’t be taken seriously making up total garbage for his fake wine claims. He has been clearly and thoroughly debunked by real expert witness testimony and real forensic evidence and I’ve thoroughly enjoyed posting it. Buster is a pathetic clown looking for any excuse for his wine claim. We all just have to shake out heads at the desperation and nuttiness of this clownish buffoon.
As we wrap up this amazing series, you can easily see facts from fiction that these wine hoaxers peddle. We had two expert witnesses who attended to Hendrix before any doctor saw him. Both men stated Hendrix was already dead on the bed covered in the brown vomit he choked to death on from a drug overdose. That cannot be disputed no matter how hard these hoaxers try. We had a police officer who confirmed it was a drug overdose death as well. Their testimony debunks anything hoaxers and Bannister tried to claim. It’s important that the truth is told of the actual accurate events that happened on 9/18/70 instead of the lies these wine hoaxers use to disparage the legacy of Jimi Hendrix. Thanks for reading along, and I look forward to presenting you the next series on Fraud Bannister and his many lies.
Hi Jason. Love your work. You might be interested to know that our friend Bannister gave three interviews about the wine and they all differ.
Thanks Ivana.
Bannister certainly can’t keep his stories straight that’s for sure. Each time he speaks his stories become more outrageous. What cooked his goose is when he clearly stated Jimi was a DOA and then he tells all these tales of frantically trying to save his life when Tappy’s pile of crap book was released. How can he frantically save the life of a man when a decade earlier he said he was already cold and dead for hours? And these 2 moron wine hoaxers thinks he was sucking out wine from a cold blue dead man for 20 minutes? These people are nuts. We know there was no throat of flooded wine or a wine soaking since Reginal Jones and John Saua never witnessed it and neither did Ian Smith or Bob Brown.
Officer Ian Smith said “he got a lot of calls like that in those days”. Smith was talking about a drug overdose not a “wine drowning”. Wine hoaxers lost their phony claim.
Ambulance Man Reginal Jones said that Jimi choked. He never said he was “drowned in wine” like these frauds claim. Wine hoaxers lost their phony claim.
Ambulance Man John Saua witnessed dry vomit all the way down Jimi’s throat. No throat full of liquid wine or plugs of vomit. The dry vomit was the vomit that Jimi inhaled that killed him. It was all the way down and he couldn’t breath. No wine was in his throat or on his body at the flat. That kills Fraud Bannister’s and the wine hoaxers “wine drowning claim”.
Bob Brown is on the record stating Jimi inhaled vomit and never said he was “drowned in wine”. This also kills their phony claim.
Dr. Thurston made it official in his final report “inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication”.
All of these men’s testimonies confirm the official record from Thurston.
What these idiot moron wine trolls don’t understand is that the dry vomit all the way down Jimi’s throat was the inhaled vomit that killed him. Their fake throat full of wine was never witnessed and ends their phony wine drowning claim for good.
Hey Buster, you gotta love this………..
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says…
“Keep hanging on to that desperation dude!”
Let’s illustrate where the desperation really is at. First we have this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 3:20 am
“Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix. Brown only said he had a “bit too much to drink”.”
And next we have this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:04 pm
“We all know Hendrix was drinking wine during the evening at Harvey’s flat. He had more wine with Monika before he took a bath and wrote his final poem “The Story of Life”. Then he had more wine at Kameron’s party when he ingested a powerful amphetamine and ate a rice meal. This is the ‘bit ‘ too much Brown was talking about. Brown never said Hendrix was ‘drowned in wine’ like these wine hoaxers claim.”
Jason is first claiming that “Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix” and then same-day he is claiming that the wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s and Cameron’s was the “bit too much Brown was talking about”. Of course, as stated earlier — the autopsy revealed a blood alcohol content of .005%, meaning that any wine that Jimi drank at either of those two places was long digested and gone — meaning there is no way Dr. Brown could be referencing wine that may have been drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s.
Can’t have it both ways — either Brown saw the wine or he didn’t (Dr. Brown saw it). Nice job by Jason tripping over his own tongue in his desperation & anyone can see that if a brain surgeon were to operate on Jason’s head and enter his skull that the surgeon would find the same substance that’s located in Jason’s large intestine — namely a large quantity of STOOL !!
Jason says ”How do you like them apples?”
Looks like Jason’s apples are full of worms & Jason’s contradiction of himself totally trashes all his long-winded blather posted above.
Jason gives himself away because he is showing us a good example of the firmer the evidence we show the more bullshit Jason has to post to make up for it…
There are probably no persons reading this now except the 4 main participants so Jason has succeeded in destroying this website as a source of evidence for Jimi’s murder…Satan is probably proud of Jason and his dedication to evil…Jason’s style looks familiar so I have a strong feeling he is either Alan Ford or Bart Kamp who followed me over from the Kennedy assassination websites where I post…They have a chip on their shoulder because I similarly smoked them over there and now they are looking for pay-back by means of cheap trolling and are being allowed…
In any case all Jason has done is go and read the material for the first time and come back and insert gratuitous nay-saying in to it for purposes of crude denial…Any person of average intelligence who has a basic understanding of the case can see the silly contrivances and distortions Jason is employing so I feel safe knowing he hasn’t put a scratch on our case for credible persons…Any credible person wouldn’t take his obvious trolling seriously and if this were a credibly moderated debate, instead of the unfiltered troll free for all it is, Jason and his obnoxious nay-say trolling would soon be gone…
We can save bandwidth here…Jason returned to his lies once again above and is repeating that the medical and police witnesses at the Samarkand did not see any wine and only saw dry vomit…When you tell Jason repeatedly that Suau described the vomit as a large “pool” and therefore revealed its high liquid content (wine) he ignores it and returns to his same lie…Jason also ignores that the large amount of wine inside Jimi that Bannister witnessed was not seen at the Samarkand because it was blocked in behind a large hard cork of vomit in Jimi’s throat…Jason is lying because in other descriptions of the death scene not posted here the ambulance men went in to more detail and clearly said that they tried to penetrate the hard dry vomit in Jimi’s throat but it was too hard and dry for their flimsy ambulance equipment so they packed Jimi up and rushed him to hospital in order to access better equipment that could…This was all made clear by the ambulance attendants and posted to Jason…But being the demented troll he is Jason then converts that to “The ambulance men sucked dry vomit out of Jimi’s throat at the Samarkand”, even though all readings of what they said said the opposite…So Jason is a proven liar just by reading and quoting what he posts (trolls)…
When I posted the best most sophisticated forensic analysis of the barbiturate science and why it proves the Vesparax could not have killed Jimi Jason simply gave it a one-line flame answer and dismissed it without ever addressing its serious merit…That is because Jason must keep his offerings at the simple trolling level otherwise it will become too clear that he can’t refute our good evidence…He’s not here to honestly discuss the evidence…He’s only here to inject demented nay-say trolling in to anything he sees…Jason ignores the science that proves Jimi could not have died by overdose and then repeats that Jimi died by overdose…
Another thing Jason hand-waved with a one-liner answer was my physiological-medical description of how the wine got locked-in behind the hard plug of vomit…It was quite accurate and described how and why, by means of body functions and how the organs work, the wine ended up corked-in to Jimi and why it was only visible to Dr’s Siefert and Bannister after their better equipment removed the plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat at hospital and exposed the wine…This explains why it was not possible for the emergency personnel at the Samarkand to witness the main incriminating wine and therefore not speak of it directly…Jason flamed it and ignored it because he knew it was legitimate and therefore totally disproved his trolling offerings…He then went back to his lies about the wine not being witnessed at the Samarkand…
Jason is in lying contempt of the wine witnesses at the Samarkand…Monika admitted to Sharon Lawrence that she poured wine on Jimi and that was why he was covered in wine…Jason deals with this by accusing Sharon Lawrence of not being credible, but any intelligent person can see it is Jason and his trolling lies that are not credible…If you read the last load of shit Jason posted he enters a large volume of BS but if you pay careful attention he avoids mentioning Dr Siefert’s saying Jimi was covered in red wine…Like the true con man hustler he is, Jason is playing a shell game here with the evidence where he’s moving the cups around quickly and hoping you don’t notice he hid the Siefert mentioning the wine ball…It is basic reality-forced common sense that for Siefert to say Jimi was covered in red wine, that therefore reality forces that same red wine to be what Dr Brown detected, and also therefore have been present at the Samarkand…In short Jason is a bullshit artist who is trying to cement his false dialogue by means of constant repetition but, as soon as any sound accounting of the facts is put to it, it quickly collapses like the troll’s house of cards it is and we are right back to Jason failing to answer the evidence, despite his carnival huckster assurances…
Jason ignored the point that Jimi was found with no vomit washed off him and no attempt to help him…The ambulance men clearly described a scene where Jimi was left in un-removed vomit “from his chest up”…Any Scotland Yard detective who was honestly investigating this and not helping to cover it up, like they did, would see right away that all the people present knew better than to try and help Jimi because they knew he was murdered…They knew there was no point and they didn’t want to go near the body…This proves Monika lied about washing sick off Jimi’s face and therefore covered-up wine she knew was used to murder Jimi…The stories of Monika panicking and not knowing what to do are bullshit invented by persons seeking to ignore the real evidence…
Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says…
“Keep hanging on to that desperation dude!”
Let’s illustrate where the desperation really is at. First we have this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 3:20 am
Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix. Brown only said he had a “bit too much to drink”.
And next we have this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:04 pm
We all know Hendrix was drinking wine during the evening at Harvey’s flat. He had more wine with Monika before he took a bath and wrote his final poem “The Story of Life”. Then he had more wine at Kameron’s party when he ingested a powerful amphetamine and ate a rice meal. This is the ‘bit ‘ too much Brown was talking about. Brown never said Hendrix was ‘drowned in wine’ like these wine hoaxers claim.
Jason is first claiming that “Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix” and then same-day he is claiming that the wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s and Cameron’s was the “bit too much Brown was talking about”. Of course, as stated earlier — the autopsy revealed a blood alcohol content of .005%, meaning that any wine that Jimi drank at either of those two places was long digested and gone — meaning there is no way Dr. Brown could be referencing wine that may have been drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s.
Can’t have it both ways — either Brown saw the wine or he didn’t (Dr. Brown saw it). Nice job by Jason tripping over his own tongue in his desperation & anyone can see that if a brain surgeon were to operate on Jason’s head and enter his skull that the surgeon would find the same substance that’s located in Jason’s large intestine — namely a large quantity of STOOL !!
Jason says ”How do you like them apples?”
Looks like Jason’s apples are full of worms.
Pig man swatter is the biggest moron around. Thanks for the laugh!
What this idiot posted still never shows Jimi Hendrix “covered in wine”
Reginal Jones, John Saua, Ian Smith saw no wine on Hendrix at the flat.
Bob Brown never saw any wine on Hendrix at the hospital.
You still only have one bottle of wine at the flat. Where are the others? LOL
keep trying pig man!
As predicted, Buster doubles down on his newly fake story while he trolls the real evidence.
We all know there was never any “hard plug of vomit” in Jimi’s throat cuz both ambulance men never witnessed any such thing.
This new fake story is a cover story for Buster so he can still claim his phony wine that no ambulance men or police witnessed.
All along Buster has been telling us that Jimi’s throat was flooded with wine all the way down to his stomach as an “overkill”. He always peddled this fake story.
Buster read John Saua’s testimony where he witnessed no flooded wine in Jimis throat. Buster knew he was screwed so he made up a new fake story to claim a “hard plug of vomit” with wine hiding below so he could still make his fake wine claim.
The problem for Buster the wine troll is that he can’t change his phony claim. He is stuck with his original fake claim of the throat of flooded wine. Buster is also calling himself a liar since he now claims the flooded throat never existed.
John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed a “hard plug of vomit” so Buster’s new fake story is already refuted.
Science also refutes Buster’s new fake claim. Buster first claimed a throat full of flooded wine. Now he claims a dry throat with “a hard plug”. You can’t have a wet flooded throat and have it become magically dry when this troll wants it to. His claims are fake and refute each other.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying because in other descriptions of the death scene not posted here the ambulance men went in to more detail and clearly said that they tried to penetrate the hard dry vomit in Jimi’s throat but it was too hard and dry.
JASON says: Buster is the one who is lying. The ambulance men never testified to any hard plugs of vomit in their testimony.
“Well, I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out, I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it.” – John Saua
JASON says: John Saua never said anything about “penetrating hard plugs of vomit”. Saua said he was sucking out dry vomit. Buster is lying again with his bullshit troll stories.
Hendrix was already dead and Doctor Bob Brown said there was no revival attempt on Hendrix.
BUSTER says: Another thing Jason hand-waved with a one-liner answer was my physiological-medical description of how the wine got locked-in behind the hard plug of vomit.
JASON says: Sorry wine troll, a “hard plug of vomit” is impossible since you already claimed a throat full of flooded wine. There is no possible way to have a dry throat as you now claim when before you claimed a wet throat full of flooded wine. You are a troll and everybody is laughing at you.
BUSTER says:Jimi was covered in red wine, that therefore reality forces that same red wine to be what Dr Brown detected.
“He was covered in vomit.” – Reginal Jones
“I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it” – John Saua
JASON says: Jimi was never covered in “red wine”. Reginal Jones and John Saua testified to Jimi being only covered in vomit. Both men never mentioned anything about wine. Bob Brown never detected any wine on Jimi. Buster can’t account for several bottles of wine at the flat except for only one. You’ve been refuted again.
Here are more of Buster’s trolling lies refuted by expert witnesses:
BUSTER says: instead of choking on vomit Jimi Hendrix had died from being drowned in red wine.
Reginal Jones: “Sit him up! No luv, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked.”
JASON says: Buster is lying again. He claims Jimi did not choke on vomit. Reginal Jones who witnessed the death scene confirms Jimi choked on vomit. This proves Jimi did not “drown in wine”. Buster is a liar.
BUSTER says: The murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder.
Reginal Jones: He was covered in vomit. There was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was.
John Saua: I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it.
JASON says: Buster is trolling and lying again. Buster said that “pure wine” was all over the bed in a “waterboarding murder”. Reginal Jones and John Saua only witnessed vomit. They said nothing about witnessing “pure wine” on the bed and pillows. They only witnessed vomit. These men never said one word about a “waterboarding murder”. Buster is a terrible liar making false murder claims.
BUSTER says: the forensic evidence precludes the pills being shoved down Jimi’s throat by the murderers.
BUSTER says: Jeffery was clever enough to leave out the fact he got Monika to dose Jimi. Probably in return for Hendrix-access favors.
JASON says: More ridiculous lies from Buster. He first says Jimi had “pills shoved down his throat by murderers” then he changes his fake story to another fake story saying Monika “dosed Jimi with pills for Hendrix access favors”. Buster makes this crap up out of thin air cuz he is a troll. None of this is true. This fool is not to be taken seriously as he makes up bogus stories.
BUSTER SAYS: Plus, if you are sharp you’ll notice Jimi’s body was found on the bed untouched and covered in vomit.
BUSTER says: Jimi was covered in red wine, that therefore reality forces that same red wine to be what Dr Brown detected.
JASON says: The troll got caught yet again. Bluster first stated Jimi was covered in vomit as witnessed by the ambulance men and now he changes the real evidence to falsely saying “Jimi was covered in wine”. Another contradiction from this wine hoaxing moron troll.
BUSTER says: Jimi was physically forced drowned with wine…He did not die from the pills.
BUSTER says: That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
JASON says: Here Bluster changes more of his fake stories. First Buster says Jimi was “physically drowned in wine” and then he says “No one would need to force wine into Jimi”. More trolling and changing stories from this clown.
Who would believe and take a clown like this seriously when he just lies and changes story after story in each comment ? This is ridiculous. This is called trolling.
Buster is refuted by professionals who say Jimi died from a drug overdose due to an inhalation of vomit.
Officer Ian Smith: We really answered a lot of calls like that in those days.
Reginal Jones: “Sit him up! No luv, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked.”
Doctor Bob Brown: whatever else and had inhaled vomitus.
Doctor Gavin Thurston: The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication.
JASON says: Officer Ian Smith said “we really answered a lot of calls like that in those days”. Smith is talking about a drug overdose. There weren’t a lot of “wine drowning” calls in London in 1970. There was a lot of drug overdoses in 1970.
Ambulance Man Reginal Jones confirmed Jimi choked to death on vomit and was not “drowned in wine”.
Doctor Bob Brown said Jimi inhaled vomit and died. Brown never said anything about wine or a “wine drowning”.
Doctor Gavin Thurston confirms inhalation of vomit in his official autopsy report. Nothing about a “wine drowning”.
Buster is a troll who pushes lies and wants this real evidence hidden from public view. The readers don’t take him seriously as they see all the lies he has made with his fake stories. Bluster can babble away with his “hard plug of vomit” and “wine drowning” garbage. Everybody knows it’s a load of crap as its already been refuted and debunked by real professionals.
These two are deliberately steering the argument towards Jimi being murdered. This insistence that there was a cover-up from everyone involved that morning is not evidence or fact it is speculation coming from Buster. Jason and I have believed the official story because there is absolutely no reason to doubt or dispute it. You cannot cover up masses of red wine and have this witnessed by everyone and then state that Jimi died of barbiturate intoxication. The cause of death would have been completely evident and apparent prior to the autopsy if this was the case. Buster has set himself up as the expert and the only expert in this matter with his false forensics analysis which dispute the official findings by the well respected and experienced pathologist in this matter. Who would be foolish enough to side with a hoaxer instead of a qualified professional in this case. As stated over and over again there was no resuscitation attempt on Jimi that produced that quantity of wine as Jimi’s heart was pounded for a few moments as stated by Dr.Seifert but Buster conveniently leaves this out because it doesn’t fit in with his murder plot. All of the witnesses that morning state that Jimi was DOA and had been dead for some time before being brought into casualty this information cannot be disputed as it fits in with the amount of time that Jimi was worked on which was minimal at best. No doctor would ever attempt a resuscitation on a long dead person as it would go against hospital protocol and procedure; this would only be attempted on a person who has passed away within minutes and not long dead like Jimi was. The doctors and ambulance officers all said that Jimi had been dead for a long period of time before being brought into the hospital so a resuscitation would have been futile. The doctors would not have wasted their time on someone like Jimi who was clearly beyond help.
These two wine trolls still only can cite one bottle of wine for their phony murder caper. They can’t account for all the others they claim.
Buster the clown changes his fake stories in each post and his junior sidekick clown follows along.
First Buster claimed a wet flooded throat full of wine and now he’s claiming a dry throat with “a hard plug” of vomit. Both ambulance men never witnessed either of these phony claims.
The readers know both of these jokers are full of crap.
Buster lied and said “pure wine was spilled all over the bed. Nobody witnessed that.
BUSTER says: The murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder.
Reginal Jones: He was covered in vomit. There was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was.
John Saua: I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it.
JASON says: Both ambulance men never witnessed “pure wine” on the bed or a “waterboarding murder”. The police would have made this a crime scene if they witnessed this. This is all a hoax by Buster.
We have Reginal Jones on record stating Jimi choked on vomit and Officer Smith stating he received a lot of calls like that in those days, meaning that Jimi was a drug overdose. Also, Bob Brown is on the record stating Jimi inhaled vomit and never said he was drowned in wine. All this evidence proves there was no wine drowning. No pure wine was ever witnessed by anybody at the flat.
BUSTER SAYS: Plus, if you are sharp you’ll notice Jimi’s body was found on the bed untouched and covered in vomit.
BUSTER says: Jimi was covered in red wine, that therefore reality forces that same red wine to be what Dr Brown detected.
JASON says: Buster first said Hendrix was only covered in vomit and then he made up the fake wine story. He is a troll.
BUSTER says: Jimi was physically forced drowned with wine…He did not die from the pills.
BUSTER says: That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
JASON says: Then Buster the clown says Jimi was “forced drowned” then after he is refuted he changes his story to “No one would need to force wine into Jimi”. Buster lies and trolls.
BUSTER says: the forensic evidence precludes the pills being shoved down Jimi’s throat by the murderers.
BUSTER says: Jeffery was clever enough to leave out the fact he got Monika to dose Jimi. Probably in return for Hendrix-access favors.
JASON says: Buster said murderers shoved pills down Jimi’s throat and next he claims Monika did it.
Nobody takes a liar like this seriously who makes up new fake stories after his first fake story was debunked. All these tales he tells are ridiculous and only has a moron like Flyswatter is believing them. 2 wine trolls who peddle fake wine stories.
Buster’s red wine drowning claims are not possible as Reginal Jones and John Saua refuted what he claims.
Buster told us Jimi Hendrix was physically drowned in wine. He also said Jimi was soaked in wine. He even said Jimi was filled full of wine to full capacity way past his throat. Buster said Jimi was “murdered in a wine drowning homicide” with gallons of flooding wine.
Ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua said Jimi was covered in vomit with dry vomit down his throat. They never witnessed Jimi physically drowned in wine. They never witnessed Jimi filled up to full capacity with wine flooding way past his throat. They never witnessed gallons of red wine flooding the bed. They never witnessed a “murder by wine homicide scene” like Buster constantly tells us. The ambulance men refuted everything Buster has said.
Buster’s claims are fraudulent and not possible. Buster’s claims have easily been refuted by the ambulance men. No way can you have a flooded throat full of wine like Buster always says when the ambulance men witnessed dry vomit inside a dry throat. There is no possible way for Buster to defend his fraudulent claim. Buster’s claim is fraudulent and is not possible.
We can easily see how fake and phony Buster’s wine drowning claim is. No massive amounts of red wine was ever witnessed at the flat. No massive amounts of wine coming out of Jimi’s mouth was ever witnessed.
What was witnessed by ambulance men was brown vomit on the pillows, dry vomit in Hendrix’s throat, and vomit on him. Not one word about gallons of red wine flooding inside Hendrix, the bed, or the pillows.
Now fraudulently, Buster wants to claim that “brown vomit” means “red wine” after he was caught in a severe lie and his phony wine drowning claims have been exposed and destroyed.
Buster told us “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed. That’s a lie. No “pure wine” was ever witnessed by anybody at the death scene. Only vomit.
Buster cannot change his destroyed claim by playing word games to change his case and the meaning. He is stuck with his phony wine drowning story after he’s been thoroughly exposed, discredited, debunked, and refuted.
Frankly speaking, Buster should be embarrassed that he ever made these phony wine claims in the first place. Now apparently, it seems he wants to double down on a debunked sham, but that is his prerogative.
Buster forgets that there in no possible way to have wine filled up to full capacity inside Jimi Hendrix coming up past his throat spilling out of his mouth when only dry vomit was witnessed all the way down Jimi’s throat. Wine cannot be flooding past up Jimi’s throat when dry vomit was witnessed. This means Jimi was never filled up with 5 bottles worth of wine to full capacity when only dry vomit was witnessed by John Saua and Reginal Jones. Buster lied and got caught and now he’s desperately scrambling looking for any lame excuse to claim wine.
Buster is already on record stating this massive wine flooding inside Hendrix took place. John Saua and Reginal Jones refuted Buster by testifying that they witnessed no massive wine flooding inside Hendrix. They only witnessed dry vomit all the way down Jimi’s throat. There was no massive wine flooding. It was never witnessed by John Saua and Reginal Jones at the Hendrix death scene.
How does Buster explain no physical wine drowning at the flat after this is all he talked about?
How does Buster explain that Jimi was never physically drowned and soaked in wine?
How does Buster explain no massive amounts of wine witnessed on the bed, blankets, and pillows?
How does Buster explain brown vomit witnessed by ambulance men on the pillows when Buster claims “red wine” was soaked in gallons on the pillows?
How does Buster expiain dry vomit all the way down Jimi’s throat witnessed by ambulance men when Buster says Jimi was filled up to full capacity with wine way past his throat spilling out of his mouth?
How does Buster explain no “pure wine” on the bed or a “waterboarding murder scene” witnessed by the police and ambulance men after Buster lied claiming there was one?
Buster needs to come clean and admit his phony “Hendrix red wine drowning claim” is not possible when only brown vomit was witnessed by ambulance men.
Jason continues to contemptuously deny the proven evidence via deliberately dishonest word games and lies…
Jason is just straight lying when he says the ambulance men never witnessed a hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat…They described it clearly when they said their flimsy ambulance sucker could not penetrate the vomit in Jimi’s throat…Jason never gives a direct answer to the clearly-described statement from the ambulance men that they tried to get through the vomit in Jimi’s throat but could not with their inadequate equipment…Dr’s Bannister and Siefert could however, with their better hospital equipment and that is why they experienced the 5 bottles of wine corked-in behind it…No matter what the evidence says Jason has to desperately stick to his lie that there was no hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat, even if all the evidence makes it clear there was…Jason also lied when he claimed the ambulance men removed dry vomit from Jimi’s throat…They never said that…What they did say was their efforts failed to penetrate the vomit…Any reading of the testimonies makes it plainly obvious that there was a hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat that the ambulance men could not penetrate…Once the hospital equipment cleared it, Dr Bannister witnessed the homicidal amount of wine that was corked-in behind it…It is all right there in the statements that this nut Jason is dishonestly mis-interpreting…
I hope people read Jason’s idiotic entries on the hard plug of dried vomit in Jimi’s throat…They are quite disqualifyingly moronic…They attempt to dismiss obvious evidence by means of inherently stupid claims…Having a hard plug of vomit in the throat does not preclude wine in the lungs, stomach, and throat like Dr Bannister witnessed and it is inherently idiotic to try to dismiss it that way…As soon as Siefert removed it (Siefert was there before Bannister and when I interviewed Bannister he said he did not remove that plug of vomit…That is why Bannister’s witnessing starts right at the wine) the pressure from the rest of the wine trapped behind it in the lungs and stomach pushed it in to the throat…Jason’s claims are idiotic on their face and not worth a response…
As usual Jason stops the quote from Suau short of: “He was in a pool of vomit, it was everywhere”…There’s several important things Jason’s con man delivery above deliberately avoids…First is that Jimi was in a massive pool of liquid vomit, as described by Suau, that obviously had a high wine content that made it liquid enough to refer to as a “pool”…The second is that Suau described the vomit as being “everywhere”…This, of course, for anyone honestly appraising this, describes the liquid high-wine-content vomit as being splashed all over the place as it was forced in to Jimi…It is obvious from Suau’s description that what he thought was an unusual vomiting event was unknown to him to also contain wine that was splashed around in the act of drowning Jimi…It is all there in Suau’s description, so it can’t honestly be said that none of the medical witnesses at the Samarkand saw any wine…A third thing Jason makes no attempt what so ever to intelligently or honestly answer is the fact that there is way too much vomit on Jimi for any drug overdose choking on vomit case…Jason has uncredibly avoided this point every time it has been made…Jones: “He was covered in vomit…There was tons of it all over the pillow”…Suau: “I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it”…Being the lying weasel he is, Jason is scurrying away from this like the snivelling little troll he is…He won’t answer the fact that the amount of vomit is proof Jimi was drowned in wine because any normal choking on vomit OD death happens at the terminal end of the overdose pathology…It happens when the body can’t expel the vomit due to barbiturate paralysis…Like I mentioned several times already and Jason ignored, if we go to legitimate choking on vomit deaths and observe the amount of vomit we will see it is normally just a drooling amount…The reason people choke on vomit is because the vomit doesn’t get ejected out of the mouth and throat so there isn’t that much outside the body…Jason responds to this with mockery and ridicule but if you pay attention he never answers the legitimate point…There’s far too much vomit for any choking on vomit death and Jason hasn’t credibly accounted for it…The amount of vomit shows a victim that still had a healthy nervous system that wasn’t far enough in to any barbiturate overdose to cause a choking on vomit death…Additionally, Jimi had a trace blood alcohol content…If you go to other choking on vomit deaths that allegedly involved alcohol you will see they had a corresponding blood alcohol content…Not so in Jimi’s case where he was just above zero…Dr Teare knew there was something wrong with this so being in on the fix he made an illegal move and tried to up the blood alcohol content with an estimate…
What we are seeing in this evidence is proof that Jimi had as much wine poured down his throat as his body could hold…Being only 1 or 2 hours in to a dangerous but non-fatal Vesparax dose, Jimi’s body surged in a last ditch brain stem survival reaction to this massive insult to the body and vomited the massive amount of wine-laden vomit the ambulance men both made a point to remark about…That’s all there is to it and what Dr Bannister witnessed, and Dr Siefert covered-up by not mentioning, then further sealed the evidence…Especially when the amount of wine Dr Bannister witnessed was forensically compared to the trace 5mg blood alcohol content…
Jimi could not have died from a 9 tablet Vesparax dose with his famous tolerance…But he especially could not have had the massive reaction witnessed by the arriving emergency professionals only 1 to 2 hours in to a 9 tablet dose…The fact barbiturate science proves beyond a doubt that Jimi could not have overdosed on the Vesparax proves that it had to be something else and that something else was the 5 bottles of wine that Dr Bannister witnessed drowning Jimi Hendrix…
Lastly, if Dr Siefert said Jimi was covered in red wine then that is corroboration of Bannister’s witnessing no matter how many times some sick people try to lie around it…Wine covering Jimi at hospital had to be wine covering Jimi at the Samarkand…
And Dr Thurston admitting Jimi had a stomach full of wine incriminates the British Inquest and medical/legal authorities because it proves they failed to input that amount of wine into their cause of death forensics…You can’t have a belly full of wine, as Thurston admitted, and only have a 5mg blood alcohol content…That alone is proof of malfeasance by the investigating authorities and corruption of the case in a political assassination…
Jason is a nitwit gadfly who tries to use silly word games to deny obvious evidence in some kind of twisted sadomasochistic trolling ritual…The context that Suau used to describe the vomit as “dry” was in the sense that the high wine liquid-containing, pooling vomit had soaked in to the bed fabrics in the 6 hours Jimi lay on the bed after being murdered…The vomit was dry because it had dried for 6 hours in a scenario where no one wiped the vomit from Jimi because they knew he was murdered…
And of course, Jason and Ivana will be back with more of their self-decreed fabrications that they pick out their asses with their toothbrush & all the while providing no credible reference sources that they can quote exactly to back up their claims, but lying misquotes and ripping things out of context.
BUSTER says: the forensic evidence precludes the pills being shoved down Jimi’s throat by the murderers.
BUSTER says: Jeffery was clever enough to leave out the fact he got Monika to dose Jimi. Probably in return for Hendrix-access favors.
Out of context? This is a clear contradiction and changing of fake stories, pig man. This is fraudulent.
When Buster gets caught in a lie, he makes up a new lie, which sounds even worse than his first.
Buster first claimed Jimi was filled up full of wine. He says his stomach was flooded with wine up to his throat spilling out of his mouth. Buster read John Saua’s testimony where Saua witnessed no wine. Buster got scared and changed his fake story to a “dry throat and a hard plug of vomit”. This is not possible. You can’t first claim a “wet flooded throat” and then change it to a dry throat.
We have Buster’s quotes of lies for you to read:
BUSTER says: That same smart detective would realize that for wine to be up to the mouth would mean everything beneath it was flooded and that the volume of that flooding would be about 5 bottles of wine.
BUSTER says: The ambulance attendants told Kathy that it was because their equipment could not penetrate that hard plug of vomit that they decided to get Jimi to the hospital so they could access equipment that could.
JASON says: You can’t claim a “hard plug of vomit” now when you first lied about the “flooded throat full of wine”. Wine doesn’t magically “dry up” for your fake new claim you peddle when you want it to. You are stick with your first fake claim forever. The ambulance men never said anything about “hard plugs of vomit”. Jimi was already dead. Nothing could be done for him.
BUSTER says: the forensic evidence precludes the pills being shoved down Jimi’s throat by the murderers.
BUSTER says: Jeffery was clever enough to leave out the fact he got Monika to dose Jimi. Probably in return for Hendrix-access favors.
JASON says: Now you lie about the pills. You claim “murderers shoved pills down Jimi’s throat” and then you claim Monika “dosed Jimi”.
You are a liar and change your first fake claim after it was exposed to be a lie to a new fake claim. This is called trolling.
No, the ambulance men never witnessed wine or “hard plugs” of vomit. Thurston never witnessed any wine since there was no wine witnessed at the flat.
Buster keeps peddling a fake quote from Sharon Lawrence’s fiction book.
Where is all the “pure wine” you claimed that was spilled all over the bed? The ambulance men sure didn’t see it.
BUSTER says: The murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder.
JASON says: This is fraudulent peddling this garbage. Another fraudulent lie exposed.
Bluster the pathetic troll is now reduced to making up stuff I never said. Pathetic and hilarious.
BUSTER says: Jason also lied when he claimed the ambulance men removed dry vomit from Jimi’s throat…They never said that…What they did say was their efforts failed to penetrate the vomit…Any reading of the testimonies makes it plainly obvious that there was a hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat that the ambulance men could not penetrate…Once the hospital equipment cleared it, Dr Bannister witnessed the homicidal amount of wine that was corked-in behind it…It is all right there in the statements that this nut Jason is dishonestly mis-interpreting.
JASON says: This lying fraud troll is a liar. Never once did I make a statement like this. The ambulance men never witnessed any “hard plugs of vomit”. Buster is a total clown and I just sit back and laugh.
More conspiracy theory garbage and not a single shred of evidence .
No wine drowning witnessed at the flat.
No throat full of wine.
No wine covering Jimi.
No “waterboarding murder scene” witnessed
No “pure wine” spilled on the bed witnessed.
No “hard plugs of vomit” witnessed
No statement from Thurston ever mentioning “a stomach full of wine”
Hilariously Buster doubles down on his same new lie about his new phony “hard plug of vomit” that never existed. The ambulance men never witnessed a “hard plug of vomit”.
Buster is lying and trolling again. All the readers know his phony con game. Buster peddles his same lie, and when he is caught in that lie, he changes his story to a new lie pretending he never told the first lie. Buster is doing the same thing here with his fake “hard plug of vomit”. That is called trolling. Well, we have all Buster’s lies in here in the public domain as evidence. Buster cannot hide from his lies or pretend he never told them.
The jig is up Buster. We know all your lies you tell and you’ve been proven to be a liar. There was never a “hard plug of vomit” or a “flooded throat of wine”. When you get caught in a lie you then peddle a new lie. Babble away Buster. Nobody believes you and the lies you peddle from Sharon Lawrence’s fiction book.
Here are Buster’s lies as he changes fake stories from one to the next.
BUSTER says: That same smart detective would realize that for wine to be up to the mouth would mean everything beneath it was flooded and that the volume of that flooding would be about 5 bottles of wine.
JASON says: Buster told this first lie about wine flooded up to Jimi’s throat and everything beneath him was flooded with wine. Buster is telling us that everything in Jimi Hendrix from his mouth all the way down to his stomach was filled full of wine.
Then Buster wants us to believe his first lie about the “flooded wine” in Jimi’s throat just magically dried up and “became dry” when Buster always said Hendrix was “flooded with wine? LOL
Buster thinks the reading public is stupid to believe his new “dry throat” “hard plug of vomit” lie. Sorry Buster, you said a “wet flooded throat”. You can’t make up a new fake story after this “flooded throat of wine” story was exposed as fake. You don’t get to make up a new fake story to still claim wine.
Buster cannot hide from this first claim or pretend he never peddled this lie. Buster read John Saua’s testimony and found there was no wine flooded in Jimi’s throat. Saua only witnessed a dry throat and dry vomit. No “flooded throat of wine” like Buster was lying about. Buster knew he was screwed so he changed this fake story to his new fake “hard plug of vomit” story so this fraud can still claim wine was in Jimi Hendrix.
This is not physically or scientifically possible. Buster clearly said Jimi Hendrix was full of wine from his stomach spilling out of his mouth. Now Buster changes his story to Jimi having a dry throat with “a hard plug of vomit”. This is not possible. Buster made up more fake stories.
Buster first said Jimi’s throat was “flooded with wine”. It can’t magically become dry cuz this trolls wants it to be. He lied about the “flooded throat full of wine” and now he is lying about the “hard lug of vomit”.
Nobody at the flat witnessed wine or a “hard plug of vomit”.
BUSTER says: That same smart detective would realize that for wine to be up to the mouth would mean everything beneath it was flooded and that the volume of that flooding would be about 5 bottles of wine.
BUSTER says: The ambulance attendants told Kathy that it was because their equipment could not penetrate that hard plug of vomit that they decided to get Jimi to the hospital so they could access equipment that could.
JASON says: Buster peddled his first fake story of a “flooded throat full of wine”. After he got caught in a lie he made up a new fake story of “a hard plug of vomit” so he still can claim wine. Science says you can’t claim a “flooded throat” and then claim a “dry throat”. Buster is a terrible liar who changes his phony stories when he is proved to be a liar. The ambulance men never witnessed “hard plugs of vomit”.
BUSTER says: The murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder.
JASON says: Here Buster lies telling us “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed. The ambulance men never witnessed “pure wine on the bed”. They only saw brown vomit. He also said there was a “murder scene” in a “waterboarding murder”. This is bogus. Nobody at the flat witnessed a “waterboarding scene with wine.” They only saw vomit. Buster is a liar.
BUSTER SAYS: Plus, if you are sharp you’ll notice Jimi’s body was found on the bed untouched and covered in vomit.
BUSTER says: Jimi was covered in red wine, that therefore reality forces that same red wine to be what Dr Brown detected.
JASON says: Buster said Jimi was covered in vomit and then lied to saying he was “covered in wine”. He contradicts himself badly.
BUSTER says: the forensic evidence precludes the pills being shoved down Jimi’s throat by the murderers.
BUSTER says: Jeffery was clever enough to leave out the fact he got Monika to dose Jimi. Probably in return for Hendrix-access favors.
JASON says: Buster said Jimi had “pills shoved down his throat by murderers” and then claims Jeffery had Monika “dose Jimi with pills”. Buster is a liar who keeps changing his fake stories Nobody takes him seriously.
All these professionals refute Buster the troll.
Officer Ian Smith: We really answered a lot of calls like that in those days.
Reginal Jones: “Sit him up! No luv, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked.”
Doctor Bob Brown: whatever else and had inhaled vomitus.
Doctor Gavin Thurston: The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication.
JASON says: All of these men clearly state that Jimi Hendrix choked on vomit.
Reginal Jones witnessed Hendrix dead and said he choked on vomit. He never said “Hendrix was drowned in wine”
Officer Ian Smith said he received a lot of drug overdose calls in those days. Jimi was an overdose call from ambulance man John Saua who believed it was an overdose.
Doctor Bob Brown and Doctor Gavin Thurston confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose due to inhalation of vomit. These people witnessed Hendrix dead and know the real truth Sharon the fraud Lawrence and Buster the clown peddle lies.
BUSTER says: And Dr Thurston admitting Jimi had a stomach full of wine incriminates the British Inquest and medical/legal authorities because it proves they failed to input that amount of wine into their cause of death forensics…You can’t have a belly full of wine, as Thurston admitted, and only have a 5mg blood alcohol content…That alone is proof of malfeasance by the investigating authorities and corruption of the case in a political assassination.
Dr. Thurston never said anything about “a stomach full of wine”. Sharon Lawrence wrote a fake quote in her book. You are a fraudulent liar and so is she.
Here is what Thurston stated:
“The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication.” – Dr. Gavin Thurston
Hi Jason. The nonsense I’ve just read above about no one wiping vomit from Jimi because he was murdered. You would think the first thing the supposed murderer would think of doing was clearing the scene of any incriminating evidence. He would have had plenty of time to do this since the ambulance was called five hours later. Buster’s speculation is not evidence the fact that Jimi had 46mgs of alcohol in his urine suggests that he drank the wine prior to arriving at the Samarkand at both the parties he attended and Tony Brown suggests that Jimi’s blood alcohol level was probably 100mgs at the time he took the Vesparax. Dr Thurston concluded that Jimi clearly died of inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. Buster is tampering and manipulating what was actually said and observed to suit his hoax murder theory. What Buster is suggesting here is not fact but theory trying to dupe people into believing Jimi was murdered.
Buster’s hoax has been exposed and all he can do is double down on his same lies.
All Buster’s “information” comes from Sharon Lawrence who is already discredited. She made up many lies and fake quotes in her book.
BUSTER says: The murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder.
Buster said “pure wine” was all over the bed in a “waterboarding murder” Nobody at the flat witnessed massive amounts of pure wine They only saw brown vomit on the pillows. Buster makes up more lies than Sharon Lawrence does.
Let the wine trolls babble away. Nobody believes what they say anyway. All their fake stories and lies are posted for all to see.
Boy is Jason dumb…If you are going to troll, I mean do it intelligently Jason because that stupid stuff you post just makes you look bad…Any intelligent person who read Jason’s responses would see he is fumbling badly and his logic is self-dismissingly idiotic…Jason is a sick troll so he’s jumbling context on purpose in order to screw-up the arguments he’s obviously unable to give a serious answer to…It is incredibly dumb to suggest the wine up to the throat Bannister witnessed conflicts with the hard plug of vomit…Jason is doing demented trolling so he’s not concerned about having to account for the fact he knows as well as I that the hard plug of vomit that the ambulance men failed to remove was at the Samarkand and the wine up to the throat was at the hospital after that plug was removed, exposing the wine…The suggestion that you must have wine up to the throat all the time or a hard plug of vomit all the time, but never the two, is moronic to the point of disqualifying Jason from any credible debate – but that doesn’t bother Jason because Jason is a sick fuck who is only here to enter any kind of crazy shit that will serve to befuddle the debate and keep him from having to answer the better evidence…
Like I said before, I feel perfectly safe that my case is still unchallenged in relation to what Jason is posting…There is no credible person who I would take seriously who would not look at Jason’s input and immediately agree that he is badly failing to answer the good evidence I post and can only resort that ridiculous cherry-picking carnival barker con man routine instead of giving straight answers to what I posted…That objective jury I am referencing would agree that Jason is putting on that buffoonish act exactly because he is demolished by the proof I am showing and the arguments proving it and can only respond with that ridiculous performance exactly because he is unable to seriously answer what I am posting…
There is another quote from the ambulance men I could not find this morning when I looked at Etchingham and Brown’s books…In it the ambulance men made clear that the suctioning equipment they had that morning was not adequate to get through the dried vomit in Jimi’s throat so they quit trying and got Jimi to the hospital instead in order to access better equipment…That quote makes clear that the hard dry plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat was not penetrated by them at the Samarkand…This asshole Jason responds troll-style by creating a deceitful mish-mash of deliberately mixed up quotes that badly rip context to shreds…But he does that deliberately in order to create a smoke screen to hide the fact he’s been totally refuted by my last post and shown to be lying…I’ll try to locate that other quote from the ambulance men where they specifically detail that their suction device that came in the ambulance was too flimsy to penetrate the vomit so they gave up and bundled Jimi off to St Mary’s where the better equipment there could clear that plug…But in the meantime here is Reg Jones: “His airway was completely blocked all the way down”…That means Jones is saying they never got through the vomit at the Samarkand…When Siefert uncorked it he uncovered a throat, lungs, and stomach that were fully engorged with wine that Dr Bannister told me in person took him and Siefert 20 minutes to remove…
And please notice that after offering this bogus mangling of evidence diversion Jason didn’t answer a single point of my other evidence (as if it would make any difference)…
Give it up Buster.
All your lies have come back to haunt you early before Halloween.
I’ve posted all your lies and how you change stories. All the real evidence refutes you.
You have no wine witnessed at the flat or on Jimi.
You have all these expert witnesses who testified to Jimi inhaling vomit due to a drug overdose.
Officer Ian Smith: We really answered a lot of calls like that in those days.
Reginal Jones: “Sit him up! No luv, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked.”
Doctor Bob Brown: whatever else and had inhaled vomitus.
Doctor Gavin Thurston: The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication.
JASON says: Officer Smith said he received a lot of drug overdose calls. Jimi was a drug overdose call
Reginal says Jimi choked on vomit and never said he was drowned in wine.
Bob Brown said Jimi died from inhaling vomit and never said he was drowned in wine.
Doctor Thurston made it official in his report.
Buster is lying again with his new fake story. There was never a ” hardcork of vomit”. He made this fake story up since his “throat full of flooded wine” story got debunked.
Blabber away Buster. You still won’t get your “wine drowning” or “hard plug of vomit” since this is fantasy that only exists in your mind,.
BUSTER says: Jason also lied when he claimed the ambulance men removed dry vomit from Jimi’s throat…They never said that…What they did say was their efforts failed to penetrate the vomit…Any reading of the testimonies makes it plainly obvious that there was a hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat that the ambulance men could not penetrate…Once the hospital equipment cleared it, Dr Bannister witnessed the homicidal amount of wine that was corked-in behind it…It is all right there in the statements that this nut Jason is dishonestly mis-interpreting…
JASON says: This lying fraud troll is a liar. Never once did I make a statement like this.
JASON posted: Oct 16 – 8:27PM:
” Our expert witnesses ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua were first on the scene to discover a dead Jimi Hendrix. Jimi was already dead on the bed inside the flat alone covered in vomit. They saw no wine anywhere like these fraudsters try to tell you. Their first part of business was to call the police and get an aspirator to use on Hendrix. The aspirator used by John Saua sucked out dry vomit from inside Jimi. Remember, there was no wine being sucked out or a phony “hard cork of vomit” inside Jimi’s throat like the con artists try to claim. ”
BUSTER says: You see Jason is just a demented troll who is spewing any kind of crazy shit that comes to his head…So not really believing what he says he fails to remember his own bullshit that he rabidly foams out of his demented head… (“Lying fraud troll”???)
Sorry Buster the clown, the only troll here is you. You have no clue what you are talking about and you truly are pathetic. You have no idea what John Saua said in his testimony. Do you?
“Well, I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out, I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it.” – John Saua
John Saua testified to sucking out Hendrix with an aspirator. Are you this stupid not to know what this means? Are you able to read? You have a severe reading comprehension problem. What a moron.
I am rolling on the floor laughing. And so are the readers!
Thanks for the laugh again Buster. Hang your head in shame for another desperate attempt at trolling.
BUSTER says: You see Jason is just a demented troll who is spewing any kind of crazy shit that comes to his head…So not really believing what he says he fails to remember his own bullshit that he rabidly foams out of his demented head… (“Lying fraud troll”???)
JASON says: No, that would be you Buster who just thoroughly embarrassed yourself yet again!
Keep it up!
No, that’s not working Jason…Your desperate clinging on to semantics and split hairs isn’t working…
First, you did say the ambulance men removed dry vomit from inside Jimi…You said you didn’t but you were lying and you did, as I showed by quoting you saying it…
But for someone who depends so much on semantics I’m surprised you tried to get away with ignoring Suau saying they had a hell of a time TRYING to suck Jimi out…If Suau had actually removed any vomit he would have just said they had a hell of a time sucking Jimi out…The reason he didn’t phrase it that way is because the other quote I tried to find made it more clear that their sucker couldn’t penetrate the vomit and they couldn’t get through it…
But let’s cut to the chase and get to the point our son of Satan liar here Jason is trying to avoid recognizing…Jason is trying to make us answer his lies…However if we approach this from the truth side of things what tells you that the ambulance men failed to penetrate the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat is the fact they never reached the wine Dr Bannister witnessed…Simple enough, if they penetrated the hard plug of dry vomit in Jimi’s throat they would have uncorked the vomit and reached the wine…The quote I’ll try to locate, where the ambulance men gave more detail, said their ambulance sucker was too flimsy to penetrate the vomit and they quickly gave up and piled Jimi in to the ambulance… Reg Jones: ” We got him off to hospital as quick as we could “…Any fool could see the words Suau chose describe an attempt that failed and this is why they were “trying” instead of actually doing…
Buster,
Saua did say in the first part of his statement:
“Well I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out [with an aspirator]. I mean the vomit was dry, and there was a hell of a lot of it. The aspirators in those days were all right but not like you have today, they couldn’t shift that lot.”
The Saua goes on to say:
“The vomit was all the way down, we couldn’t have got an airway down”
Obviously, from that, Jimi’s throat was not cleared by the ambulance men & that Jimi’s airways were still plugged when they got him to the hospital.
Yet, we Jason stupidly saying saying “there was no hard plug of vomit”, even though Saua makes it clear that there was vomit preventing him from getting an airway.
Gee, is Jason ever stupid, thinking his self-decree of “there was no hard plug of vomit” automatically over-rules the testimony of a man that was there stating that there was.
Quite correct, Buster…..
Jason says “When Buster gets caught in a lie, he makes up a new lie, which sounds even worse than his first.”
Pot calling the kettle black, as evidenced by this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 3:20 am
“Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix. Brown only said he had a “bit too much to drink”.”
And next we have this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:04 pm
“We all know Hendrix was drinking wine during the evening at Harvey’s flat. He had more wine with Monika before he took a bath and wrote his final poem “The Story of Life”. Then he had more wine at Kameron’s party when he ingested a powerful amphetamine and ate a rice meal. This is the ‘bit ‘ too much Brown was talking about. Brown never said Hendrix was ‘drowned in wine’ like these wine hoaxers claim.”
As said before — Jason is first claiming that “Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix” and then same-day he is claiming that the wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s and Cameron’s was the “bit too much Brown was talking about”. Of course, as stated earlier — the autopsy revealed a blood alcohol content of .005%, meaning that any wine that Jimi drank at either of those two places was long digested and gone — meaning there is no way Dr. Brown could be referencing wine that may have been drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s.
Jason can’t refute that he’s clearly contradicting himself & got exposed doing so we get Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, giving this moronic response :
“Pig man swatter is the biggest moron around. Thanks for the laugh!
What this idiot posted still never shows Jimi Hendrix “covered in wine”
Reginal Jones, John Saua, Ian Smith saw no wine on Hendrix at the flat.
Bob Brown never saw any wine on Hendrix at the hospital.
You still only have one bottle of wine at the flat. Where are the others? LOL
keep trying pig man!”
Does make you wonder why Jason feels the need to make self-references of ‘pig man’ with his responses, as we already know that & have stated that, so there isn’t any need for Jason to tell us what he is.
As for Jimi being covered in wine, it was stated so by both Seifert and Bannister, and what else what make Dr. Brown think Jimi has anything to drink?
Not sure where Jason is getting “one bottle of wine” from, but we do know that Jason has been saying “no wine ever existed”. Can’t have it both ways. Very sloppy liar.
Flyswatter: Did you notice the shell game street hustler Jason used his usual blowhard trash talk routine to hide the Dr-Siefert-saying-Jimi-was-covered-in-red-wine ball?…
Do you see how Jason works his con?…He distracts you with those bullshit lies about the wine and hard plug of vomit in order to make you forget he hasn’t answered Siefert’s saying Jimi was covered in red wine…Jason is beaten with that quote, so what you are seeing is like a rat slowly dying of the poison he’s eaten but trying to fool himself it isn’t inside him…Jason is a bullshit artist who tries to answer evidence he knows refutes him with a long-winded bullshit rap of lies, distortions, and aggressive accusations, however, like is true every time he posts, once you absorb and cross check his latest reply you realize he dishonestly tap-danced around giving any answer to Dr Siefert saying Jimi was covered in red wine…Dr Siefert’s witnessing is the death knell to the deniers because it confirms Dr Bannister and his witnessing…It also tells you what made Dr Brown remark Jimi had too much to drink…The reason this dishonest piece of shit Jason ignores Siefert’s witnessing is because he knows it proves that there was wine witnessed at the Samarkand, contrary to his demented lies…
Another thing trolling-as-he-learns-about-the-case-for-the-first-time Jason is ignorant of is there is a quote from Monika out there that I’ve read where she says she bought one bottle of white and one bottle of red wine that afternoon for the flat…She probably said that as part of her lies to make it look like wine was innocently available at the flat and Jimi had drank it…I saw another quote on Crosstown Torrents that said Jimi took 2 bottles of wine with him from Kameron’s when he left the party…And, of course, who knows how many bottles Jeffery’s murderers brought with them…
Jason previously trolled too carelessly when he said “Dr Siefert never mentioned any wine”…Sloppy indeed Flyswatter, and also dead and done as far as this debate…
Yes, Buster………
It is quite noticeable, that the stupid little sorry excuse for it’s mommy not taking her birth-control pills at whatever point in time it was conceived, by the name of Jason, always omits things that don’t fit his narrative (such as Seifert being recorded on video stating Jimi was covered in red wine).
Here’s another example with one of jack-off Jason’s misquotes:
JASON says:
October 18, 2019 at 4:26 pm
“Doctor Bob Brown: whatever else and had inhaled vomitus.”
Notice that Jason, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, doesn’t provide the full sentence of that quote?
Dr Brown’s full quote can be seen here:
https://www.couriermail.com.au/entertainment/music/about-that-jimi-hendrix-death-business/news-story/ce5ff67c5e0c9a0857b51eb33d88357b?sv=55d2698fd5dee338cff30dfcede38062
And Dr. Brown full quote says :
“He’d had a bit too much to drink and whatever else and had inhaled vomitus”
But, of course, Jason purposely omits the “too much to drink part” for the obvious reason of continuing his rehash of “Doctor Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix” as well as “He never said “Jimi was covered in wine””, because Jason knows it leads right back to the same place with the unanswered question of “what would make Dr. Brown make Jimi had anything to drink, at all?” Jason can’t answer the question & can only evade it and pull self-decreed fabrications out of his ass.
And as far as Jason’s statement, regarding Dr. Brown, of “He never said “Jimi was covered in wine”, Jason is too stupid to realize that there is a flip-side to that. And that is, Dr. Brown never stated that Jimi WASN’T covered in wine. Jason thinks his self-decreed fabrications blinds everybody to that flip-side, but they don’t. Jason is only one who is blind to it.
One more thing, Buster, that shows Jason to be a very sloppy liar…………
JASON says:
October 18, 2019 at 2:35 pm
Brown said that 40 years later, moron. He never said “Jimi was covered in wine” and said Jimi died of a drug overdose not a “wine drowning”.
Another self-decreed fabrication that pulls out of his ass. Dr. Brown never said “Jimi died of a drug overdose”. Anybody can click the link in my above post and clearly see that Dr. Brown never said that. Who’s the real moron? Why that would be Jason, as evidenced by his lying misquotes
Jason can’t even get his lies in the correct order.
And Buster, we have this……
“JASON says: If there was wine witnessed at the flat, the ambulance men would have testified to witnessing wine. They both said nothing about wine and only said vomit each time. Red wine wouldn’t be hard to miss especially when you lied claiming “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed” and there was a “waterboarding wine murder”. If there was that much wine as you claimed, don’t you think Jones and Saua would have testified to witnessing “massive wine” on the bed? There was no wine, which is why they never even said the word. The phony wine claims you peddle came after their testimonies were told. So, that’s how we know there was no wine. You are trying to play word games looking for excuses for wine. Sorry, no wine was found.”
THAT, is nothing more than an assumption made by Jason. Well, guess what? The assumption can just as easily be made that if the ambulance men had been asked directly about the wine (which they never were), that they would have confirmed it, based off of what Dr. Bannister and Dr. Seifert said about it, as well as Dr. Brown stating that Jimi had a “a bit too much to drink”.
The only one playing word games is Jason, and of course, is doesn’t answer what Seifert said about Jimi being covered in wine, nor answer the question of “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink”, if there was “no wine”, as Jason keeps spewing out of his anal sphincter?
Buster is like a drowning man in the middle of the ocean gurgling under the water with his head barely above the surface. Except Buster is drowning in his lies of fake wine and hard plugs of vomit that doesn’t exist.
BUSTER says: Jason is just going to try to force his cheap trick of pretending he honestly believes that there was no mention of the wine at the Samarkand so therefore it doesn’t exist.
JASON says: If there was wine witnessed at the flat, the ambulance men would have testified to witnessing wine. They both said nothing about wine and only said vomit each time. Red wine wouldn’t be hard to miss especially when you lied claiming “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed” and there was a “waterboarding wine murder”. If there was that much wine as you claimed, don’t you think Jones and Saua would have testified to witnessing “massive wine” on the bed? There was no wine, which is why they never even said the word. The phony wine claims you peddle came after their testimonies were told. So, that’s how we know there was no wine. You are trying to play word games looking for excuses for wine. Sorry, no wine was found.
BUSTER says: There was mention of the wine only they used the word “vomit” because they had no reason to distinguish the wine at that time so they simply responded to the high wine-content vomit as “vomit”.
JASON says: HAHA. Nice try playing your word games.These men witnessed no wine at the flat. They only witnessed brown vomit. Brown vomit does not mean “red wine” as you falsely claim. You lied claiming “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed. Did you forget about this beauty you told?
BUSTER says: The murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder.
JASON says: This scene wouldn’t be hard to miss if it actually existed, but as we all know it did not. The ambulance men would have witnessed all this wine you claimed and not just have said vomit. You lied about this fake murder scene with “pure spilled wine”. There was no high volumes of wine along with the vomit. There only was brown vomit from the reaction to the high number of pills ingested. No “pure red wine” was ever witnessed. So, now you can’t use this lie anymore either. What are you gonna do now?
BUSTER says: Jason tries to deny Sharon Lawrence’s witnessing of Monika admitting she poured wine on to Jimi by attacking Sharon Lawrence and calling her unreliable.
JASON says: Don’t you know any other Hendrix “information” besides what Sharon Lawrence tells you? You’re not much of an “expert” always peddling her lies and just believing whatever she tells you.
Yes, I am very out spoken that I deny what Sharon Lawrence says. Sharon Lawrence has lied many many times which is why I don’t believe a word of what she says.
Sharon committed felony perjury under oath in court. She lied and said Jimi Hendrix committed suicide. She lied about where Jimi was born in her book. She made up a fake quote about Jimi’s mother before she died. Sharon made up a fake quote about Dr. Thurston and ‘imbibed wine’. So no, I’m not going to believe what she says until I find out what she is saying is actually factual. You just believe whatever nonsense she says. That’s why you are always refuted and debunked with your phony claims. You just parrot what she tells you.
BUSTER says: Jason violates the rules of evidence above…If Jason tried the arguments he is making in front of a judge and jury he’d be laughed out of court…The way the rules of evidence work is confirmed evidence takes precedent over unconfirmed or theorized evidence…What Jason is trying to get away with above with his disingenuous manipulation of semantics is a classic case of proving a negative.
JASON says: What Sharon Lawrence says in a book is not evidence. All the real evidence shows Jimi was never “murdered in a wine drowning”. The ambulance and police men testimony, the real forensic analysis, and Teare’s autopsy shows Hendrix dies from a drug overdose. Frauds like Tappy Wright lied to sell a book.
BUSTER says:Jason might have a case if there was no vomit at all at the Samarkand, but in this specific case we have a reasonable explanation for there being no mention of wine specifically at the Samarkand…And that is because it was being covered under the general term “vomit”.
JASON says: Well, I’m glad you finally admit that I have a case and that you don’t Maybe you have finally seen the light.
There is no “reasonable explanation” for the case that you don’t have. If all the wine you claim that was present in a “waterboarding murder scene” would be obvious to these men. They definitely would have said “mass wine”. So why didn’t they? There wasn’t any wine there that’s why. You lied about this whole thing.
BUSTER says: The murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder.
JASON says: The scene you are describing would be obvious to anybody and they would have said wine. This proves no wine existed which is why they never said wine.
BUSTER says: Also, if Monika said she poured wine on Jimi at the Samarkand that is certainly NOT an example of no one witnessing wine at the Samarkand as Jason falsely asserts…Sharon asked Monika why Jimi was covered in wine and Monika admitted he was by giving a reason for it…Jason is trying to avoid this in broad daylight and that makes him a demented liar…It’s not Sharon Lawrence who is uncredible here, as the snake oil salesman Jason assures us – it is Jason…
JASON says: You sure are desperate for wine aren’t you? Monika “pouring wine on Jimi” as you claim still doesn’t help you win your phony murder caper. You claim Jimi had wine poured inside of him. You are claiming wine was poured on him by Monika. Not the same thing. Still the gallons of wine you claim was inside Hendrix you can’t come up with.
BUSTER says: The wine witnessed by Dr’s Bannister, Brown, and Siefert is material, prima facie evidence…It is tangible evidence we can point to and use as proof.
JASON says: Doctor Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix. He has never said he witnessed wine on him. John Saua, Reginal Jones, Ian Smith never witnessed wine on Hendrix at the flat. That’s all the evidence right there that proves no wine was on Jimi.
BUSTER says: Jason is a proven fraud because after the many times he had it explained to him that the ambulance men never penetrated the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat, and therefore never witnessed the 5 bottles of wine trapped behind it, he ignores it and once again says the ambulance men never witnessed the wine Jimi was drowned in…That right there proves Jason is a demented troll who is not here for honorable purposes.
JASON says: The only fraud here is you Buster, after you always claimed Hendrix’s throat was filled up full of wine spilling out of his mouth you changed your story to a “hard plug of vomit”. That is called being a fraud.
You read Saua’s testimony that proved Jimi’s throat was not filled up with wine. You got scared and then changed your fake story to a “hard plug of vomit” so you can still claim wine. Your fake first claim and second have been debunked.
There was never a “hard plug of vomit” witnessed by Reginal Jones or John Saua.
BUSTER says: That same smart detective would realize that for wine to be up to the mouth would mean everything beneath it was flooded and that the volume of that flooding would be about 5 bottles of wine.
BUSTER says: The ambulance attendants told Kathy that it was because their equipment could not penetrate that hard plug of vomit that they decided to get Jimi to the hospital so they could access equipment that could.
JASON says: Here is your first fake claim and now your second fake claim. Both have been debunked and contradict each other. You are a clown.
BUSTER says: And Jason also ignores that we proved the wine Dr Bannister witnessed with Dr Thurston’s statement that “Jimi’s stomach contents showed he had imbibed a large amount of red wine”…That’s proof no matter how many times Jason trolls and denies it.
JASON says: Dr. Thurston never ever made a statement about ‘imbibed wine’. This is another fake quote from Sharon Lawrence’s book. I’ve already debunked this in my “Debunking the imbibed wine myth” Series.
Here is the official statement from Doctor Thurston that perfectly dovetails with the rest of the expert witnesses.
Doctor Gavin Thurston: The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication
Officer Ian Smith: We really answered a lot of calls like that in those days.
Reginal Jones: “Sit him up! No luv, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked.”
Doctor Bob Brown: whatever else and had inhaled vomitus.
JASON says: All of these men clearly state that Jimi Hendrix choked on vomit due to a drug overdose. Officer Ian Smith said he received many drug overdose calls and that Hendrix was one. Jones said he choked on vomit and never said “Jimi was drowned in wine”. Brown makes it official along with Thurston that Hendrix died from inhalation of vomit and not a “wine drowning.”.
All this real evidence and testimony refutes and debunks your phony “wine drowning” claims.
During Kathy’s investigation Dr.Crompton said the barbiturate readings of Jimi’s liver were so high that he could not have possibly survived. So much has been made of Michael Jeffrey’s involvement with spy agencies but he only managed to rise to the rank of Private in the army. Dr. Bannister gave three different accounts of the wine that morning from copious, to none, to some. He said the Jimi was an unusually tall man drenched in wine so he was clearly remembering another patient from around that time. He also had a reputation for being “sleazy” and was sacked from St Mary’s and was afterwards de-registered for fraudulent behaviour and circumstances. The dry vomit blocking his airways would not have been there if Jimi had been drowned in wine as the aspirations used by the ambulance officers would have flushed out the food/vomit and the wine would have then been seen gushing out but none was observed either by the crew or the doctors that morning. Hoaxers rely heavily on their two sources Bannister and Wright for their theories but both these stories have been superseded by more credible witnessing from that morning and by Kathy’s investigation.
Buster and Co., have used unreliable sources in order to concoct their stories and manipulated the evidence to convince us that Jimi was murdered. Without Bannister and Wright tin foil hatters have no story as the official cause of Jimi’s death was inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication and not the red wine.
Excellent post Ivana.
Even with Fraud Bannister’s and Tappy’s bogus tales, tin foil hatters have no story cuz they have to change the fake stories into their own version. How pathetic is that?
Tappy was exposed as a fraud claiming Jeffery killed Jimi but Jeffery was in Spain. So, now tin foil hatters change it to “Jeffery arranged the murder”. Tin foil hatters downgrade the effect of Tappy’s fake story but they still push their hoax with their own version.
Tin foil hatters claimed Hendrix was “drowned in wine”. But now change their story to “hard plugs of vomit” since they read Saua’s testimony where he witnessed only vomit. What’s hilarious is these morons abandoned “wine” for vomit and they debunked their own wine claim that never existed.
They only can claim one bottle of wine that they now say Monika “poured on Jimi” since Sharon Lawrence told them. Now they can’t account for any wine they claimed was poured into Jimi. Not much of a “wine drowning” is it?
They now quote Saua where he never says anything about “a hard plug of vomit” which ruins their phony case.
They also quote Bob Brown where he said Jimi inhaled vomit which wrecks their phony case even more.
No wine was witnessed at the flat and Brown witnessed no wine either at the hospital. Brown said it was an inhalation of vomit and never said “drowning”. Fraud Bannister is the only one to claim that. He was convicted for 3 counts of fraud. Tin foil hatters choose frauds and liars for their “sources” and eat up every word like saps. That’s why they are always easily debunked and refuted.
These morons debunked their own phony claims themselves.
Hilarious!
There’s a good example of the evil art of “denial trolling” above being done by Jason for any study-er’s of the internet…If anyone is following this thread (and I doubt there are) Jason is answering substantive proof that disproves him by ignoring that proof and just repeating his lies once again in a worse way where the same claim that was refuted by us is deliberately offered again in an even more outrageous way that increases the offense for the purpose of flaunting it in our faces…Jason is a sick pup and he is doing it for trolling effect…
If you read Jason’s last reply he uses the same trick of aggressively denial trolling me and pretending he is in command of the evidence, however after you read and absorb his latest garbage truck dump you’ll see he has once again ignored and failed to answer documentarian David Kramer’s video of Dr Siefert saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…Jason is mentally ill, so living in his own self-created world of dishonesty he deludes himself that he is getting away with ignoring this…Jason is nuts because reality dictates that when Mr Kramer releases his documentary it will be shown that Siefert witnessed and spoke of the wine in quite revealing way…A way that totally vindicated Dr Bannister but also proved that our boy Jason here is a shameless lying piece of shit and demented troll…Jason’s lie that Siefert witnessed no wine will be proven to be the crazy denial that it is and Jason will assume his proper place in the booby hamper…
If anyone cares to notice in my last posts I mentioned that the high liquid-containing vomit that Suau described as a large “pool” (because of its obvious liquid wine content) was totally ignored by demented Jason in his last denial dump…If you read what I wrote Jason totally ignored my pointing-out that the pillows, bed coverings, and blankets were an absorbent material that would soak up the liquid wine over the 6 hours Jimi lay dead on the bed…If you want to know what the truth is just watch what Jason tries to get away with ignoring…Jason is trying to sucker us in to the hoops and hurdles of his demented word games…Meanwhile any fool could see that the death scene clearly consisted of wine that had soaked in to the bedding fabrics after 6 hours and left dried vomit behind it…Proof of this is the fact our resident nut here Jason tries to ignore it…Suau: “Pool”…
Jason shows his insanity by speaking in a way that suggests that we would care what an obvious lying scumbag like himself would think…His opinion on Sharon Lawrence is something I would not care about because Jason has already proven himself to be a lying nut…I generally don’t consider the opinions of obviously mentally-ill people in serious matters…Jason is just repeating the same shit over and over…We have already discussed this…Sharon was a reporter and her being there for Jimi’s death was the most important story of her career…What this rotten piece of shit Jason is asking us to believe is that, even though Sharon was a trained reporter, her claim that Jack Meehan interviewed Dr Thurston and heard him say Jimi had imbibed a large amount of red wine, was yet another crazy hoax by a main witness that only the proven demented liar Jason has figured out…Jason, with his crazy lies and denial is the guy who has figured out that all the most damning witnesses all somehow colluded on a crazy hoax and are all lying…So that means Jason never gets to the part where he discusses that Ms Lawrence was a reporter who obviously took notes that day because she mentioned the date of that interview…Sharon Lawrence obviously related that account from her notes that I have no doubt she could verify…Jason, being a worshipper of Satan and his lies, knows this so he tries the cheap trick of discrediting Ms Lawrence…Like I said before, I have full confidence that if we could get Sharon Lawrence in to this conversation she would quickly give concrete confirmation to her citation of Meehan and quickly dispatch a sick little troll (who I am sure would ignore his being refuted and simply continue his sick trolling)…Sharon Lawrence witnessed two important things…The first was Jack Meehan hearing Dr Thurston say Jimi had a stomach full of wine…This is confirmation of the wine so this unbanned troll is going to deny it any way he can…The second was Sharon getting Monika to admit she poured wine on Jimi…Jason is mentally ill so I direct anyone hanging in on this debate to look at the demented response above that Jason gave to this:
” JASON says: You sure are desperate for wine aren’t you? Monika “pouring wine on Jimi” as you claim still doesn’t help you win your phony murder caper. You claim Jimi had wine poured inside of him. You are claiming wine was poured on him by Monika. Not the same thing. Still the gallons of wine you claim was inside Hendrix you can’t come up with. ”
Any reasonable person reading the above would agree Jason is stupidly, and in a crazy manner, avoiding giving an honest answer to Monika pouring wine on Jimi…Jason is dodging that honest answer via a rather idiotic line of logical reasoning…This entry is quite moronic and evades answering wine being proven to be on Hendrix by asserting that if there was wine poured inside Jimi there could be no wine poured on to his exterior…That’s as crazy as it is stupid and once again Jason has publicly failed to answer valid evidence…Jason is yielding the wine seen by Siefert by doing this…No credible person could see what Jason is doing here as anything other than indirectly admitting the wine via demented trolling…Failing points badly is sort of the same thing as admitting good evidence…The reason Jason is provably mentally ill is because he just admitted the wine Monika poured on Jimi above…Yet a few paragraphs later he posts that there was no wine on Jimi…That’s the definition of mental illness (or demented trolling…Take your pick)…
The next insanity Jason tries to get away with is once again repeating his nutty claim that there was no hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat…This is right in the face of Flyswatter and I showing the direct word of the ambulance attendants saying that their equipment failed to clear the vomit in Jimi’s throat and that it “went all the way down”…Jason lives behind the dishonest protection of his own lies, but since we have proven him wrong on his lies that there was no wine witnessed at the hospital (Jason crazily ignores Dr Siefert’s admission that Jimi was covered in red wine) Jason has nothing to hide behind…I assure you Jason is mentally ill because we can see him trying to convince himself that his load of bullshit counters his not answering Siefert’s admission…What he is dishonestly trying to say there indirectly is that his lies serve as adequate counter to Siefert…But anyone can see they are just more lies that don’t do anything to affect or answer Siefert’s damning admission…Anyway, we have proven there was a hard plug of vomit remaining in Jimi’s throat that the ambulance men “tried” but couldn’t get through…That vomit obviously served to cork-in the wine that was behind it that Dr Bannister would witness at the hospital…Let’s look at another one of Jason’s mentally ill offerings:
” JASON says: The only fraud here is you Buster, after you always claimed Hendrix’s throat was filled up full of wine spilling out of his mouth you changed your story to a “hard plug of vomit”. That is called being a fraud. ”
This answer is once again as idiotic as it is dishonest…When Jason typed that he knew I did not say what he is quoting me as saying…It was clearly spelled-out to Jason from the quotes of the ambulance attendants that they could not get through the vomit in Jimi’s throat with their equipment and that the vomit “went all the way down” – meaning they failed to clear it…Jason has been informed of this more than proven evidence yet he continues to return with lies in response…The remaining vomit (which was probably most of it) was clearly what could be described as a “hard plug of vomit”, so Jason is provably wrong when he denies this…Jason also knows that the plug of vomit was at the Samarkand and it was removed by Siefert at St Mary’s…So Jason is offering a deliberate lie when he says I changed my story…If Jason posted what I actually said instead of his deliberate distortion this would be clear…So what we have with Jason is a sick motherfucker who lies and mis-quotes you when he is trapped by the evidence…What I did say was the hard plug of vomit the ambulance men failed to penetrate at the Samarkand was removed by Siefert just before Bannister got to Jimi…That is why a hard plug of vomit was PROVEN at the Samarkand and the wine in the throat was PROVEN at St Mary’s…Jason is lying above…I never said what he quoted me as saying…And he is using that lying strawman to avoid answering the correct evidence he still hasn’t answered…The above is proof that Jason knows this is true so the only thing he can do is dementedly troll it…When Jason gets to something that clearly refutes him he goes on the offensive with an aggressive lie in order to avoid evidence he knows is true, and that is what he is doing here, once again…He’s lying when he says I changed my story…
What Jason is self-excusing himself from is the fact that, once again, after dumping another load of bullshit, he has publicly, repeatedly failed to answer some simple evidence…The first is “What made Dr Brown say Jimi had too much to drink?”…Jason tried to get away with a lie in response by saying Brown noticed the wine Jimi had been drinking that night…The problem with that is Jason once again violates the rules of evidence with that preposterous lie…Jimi had a trace blood alcohol content, which means he had digested the wine Jason is trying to palm off on us as being the wine Brown detected…The vomit Brown witnessed was forensically upstream from that trace blood alcohol content and would therefore be even less available to be detected…So Jason is running roughshod across the rules of evidence by trying to say this is what Brown detected…If we go to Jason’s total failure to credibly answer Monika’s admission that she poured wine on Jimi we can assume this was part of the wine Dr Brown witnessed…So plain and simple, since the wine Jimi drank is provably not available to be detected because it had been digested down to a trace, that means Dr Brown had to have sensed something else to make him say Jimi had too much to drink…Jason is simply uncredible by trying to ignore the fact he failed to answer that the wine Monika admitted pouring on Jimi had to be that wine – not to mention the wine Siefert mentioned that Jason uncredibly ignored…
The second important evidence is Dr Siefert saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…Jason is a dumb motherfucker because he is stupid enough to trollishly set himself up to be discredited as soon as Kramer’s video comes out…Jason is also mentally ill enough to not realize Siefert’s admission corroborates Meehan and Sharon Lawrence…If Jimi was covered in red wine, that we have proven with a series of professional witnesses that Jason can’t answer in public, then that shows proof for the red wine that was inside Jimi by default…When that video comes out and we see Siefert saying this in his own words then “poof!” goes a pernicious denial troll and his demented lies…After all, Siefert was there and was a renowned medical professional…And Jason is just a shit stain on the sidewalk of the internet…
Jason: Answer Siefert’s admission that “Jimi was covered in red wine” honestly and directly or forfeit the debate…
Another super long boring post from Buster repeating his same debunked lies. I guess if he thinks he repeats them enough they will come true.
Out of all the entire bloated paragraphs that Buster wrote, no useful information was ever published. Buster proclaims Sharon Lawrence as a hero for making up terrible lies in her book. So I guess Buster agrees with Sharon that Jimi was born at a family friend’s house and that Jimi committed suicide.
Only a sick individual would keep repeating the same debunked lies peddling a hoax wanting Jimi to be “murdered” in a horrible fashion. Then after they are debunked, they get angry that their claims were proven wrong and make up more new phony “murder” claims. That is definition of a very sick mentally ill individual.
When Buster learns that his phony stories are debunked he quickly changes them to another phony one. This tells us he is just perpetrating a hoax. Real events never change. Buster changes his stories all the time. So yes, it is one poorly attempted hoax with ridiculous stories coming from two amateur wine clowns.
Buster claimed Jeffery “murdered Hendrix” then he changed his story to Jeffery “arranging the whole thing”. He said “murderers shoved pills down Jimi’s throat” and changed that to “Monika dosing Jimi”. Also, Buster said “pure wine was spilled all over the bed” now he plays word games and says “brown vomit” means “red wine”. Buster says in one comment that Jimi was “forced drowned” and in the next comment he says “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”. Finally Buster said, Jimi’s throat was “flooded with wine spilling out of his mouth” and he now changed it to a dry throat and “a hard plug of vomit” after he read John Saua’s testimony of no wine ever witnessed. So in the end, Buster has changed the original version of his stories into a new fake version that refutes his first and debunks the new fake version. This is how we all know Buster’s stories are a phony hoax. Real actual events don’t change over and over and over. Real events are etched in stone and never change no matter what. Just like the actual way Jimi died of a drug overdose choking on his own vomit. But these wine hoaxers try to push their evil murder hoax and suppress the real evidence.
Also, these two wine clowns have no idea who they want to claim their actual “murderer” is in their phony murder caper. There is many various people or groups they claim but can never settle on who they want to officially give the honors to. They still have no clue if they want to say if Jimi was “forced drowned” or “not forced drowned”. They are also confused whether they claim if Jimi was “forced fed” pills or just simply “incapacitated” from pills by Hendrix swallowing 9 on his own. Then I guess the “killers” waited outside until Jimi got really sleepy and burst through the door and started pouring the wine that nobody at the flat could ever witness. So, you can see just how fake their phony murder caper is with a mish mash of goofy plots of uncertainty with no real characters or direction.
Buster expects us to believe the “flooded throat of wine” that he originally said was inside Jimi would just magically “dry up” into a “hard plug of vomit” in the the very next post Buster wrote after John Saua debunked his phony claim. Sorry, Buster can’t keep changing his phony claims each time they are debunked. He is stuck with the original fake claim forever.
Buster debunks his new phony “hard plug of vomit” claim since all the wine Buster says is hiding below the “hard plug of vomit” would actually soften it up being soaked with all that wine from the bottom. So, the plug wouldn’t be hard after all. It would be soft. So, Buster debunks his own phony claims since no “plugs” or “wine” was ever witnessed by the ambulance men.
Not one man at the flat witnessed wine on the bed or on Hendrix. They never even said the word wine. Buster lied saying “pure wine” was poured all over the bed and Hendrix. That was never witnessed or testified to by any man.
Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi at the hospital. Bob Brown said Hendrix died of a drug overdose and an inhalation of vomit. But Buster still wants to whine about wine he can never find.
Buster the clown still doesn’t seem to understand that when no wine was witnessed on Hendrix at the flat no wine can be witnessed at the hospital. Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix at the hospital and he was the first doctor to see Hendrix being wheeled in by Saua and Jones. So, no wine witnessed at the flat or by Brown. Buster the clown has no answer for that.
Sharon Lawrence made up a fake quote in her book about Dr. Thurston. Thurston spoke with hundreds of reporters about Jimi’s death and never once said anything about ‘imbibed wine’ to any of them. Thurston’s final report said inhalation of vomit. Just like Doctor Bob Brown and ambulance men Reginal Jones anddrowning John Saua witnessed at the flat. Officer Ian Smith testified to Kathy Etchingham that “he received a lot of calls like that in those days” which was a drug overdose. Bob Brown said Hendrix died of a drug overdose, so there was no ‘imbibed wine’ like Lawrence lies. There is no quote on record from Dr.Thurston himself, it is only a quote from Lawrence who made up many fake quotes in her fiction book that these wine clowns fell for hook, line, and sinker.
We already know Buster lied when he said “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed. That was never witnessed. So, that means the ambulance men were correct when they said only brown vomit. John Saua and Reginal Jones never said wine cuz they never witnessed any wine.
Also, Buster lied telling us wine was spilling out of Jimi’s mouth, flooding his throat, filling up his entire stomach. The ambulance men never witnessed no such thing which is why Buster changed his story again.
When Buster is caught in a lie he quickly changes his story to a new one. Now he is left backpedaling trying to weakly explain away his lies and debunked claims to the readers who just laugh and shake their heads. All of Buster’s lies have come back to haunt him early before Halloween.
So, once more we have the words of a mentally unstable man who keeps angrily repeating the same debunked claims over and over. You prove to this guy his claims are debunked and he doubles down even more. That’s crazy.
Buster is clearly a beaten man. Just look at the anger and desperation coming out of his posts. Nothing but projection, blatant lies, character attacks, foul language, and the same repetitive lies and phony claims over and over. If Buster was confident with his case, he certainly wouldn’t be going berserk making no sense trying to prove already debunked claims.
Buster has no evidence. He has only claims from fraud sources and the garbage he makes up in his own head. Sorry, that is not real evidence. It is fantasy. Which is what Buster lives in believing Jimi was murdered.
Buster was clearly shown that Sharon Lawrence is a liar. She committed felony perjury under oath, made up fake quotes in her book about Jimi’s mother and Dr. Thurston, she lied saying Jimi was born at a family friend’s house, said Jimi committed suicide in her fiction book. Buster doesn’t hold Sharon accountable for her lies, but he attacks me instead, while still continuing to promote her bogus propaganda. That’s insane.
It has already been told to Buster many times, that unless he has physical or documented evidence of wine then he has no claim. People can make any wine claim they want, unless there is actual documented evidence, no wine can be claimed. He still can’t understand that preferring to live in a haze of delusion.
If there was this huge massive wine drowning as Buster claims, then actual hospital documentation would exist that proves it. Everything is written down in a medical file. Nobody witnessed wine at the flat so you can’t claim wine after the fact.
Buster uses his lame word games again trying to claim a “pool” means “wine”. Everybody is laughing hard again. Saua and Jones gave graphic detail about vomit but never said the word wine. Buster the clown lied and said there was a massive wine drowning. If all that wine was clearly present, then they would graphically describe the wine. They never did say wine since there was no wine there.
Buster lies about a “hard plug of vomit” that was never described by Saua. More phony word game inventions from Buster the clown. Remember it was Buster who lied about a throat full of flooded wine he said that Jimi had. Now he wants to change his story to a “hard plug of vomit” as he admits it wasn’t a wine drowning. Sorry, Buster the clown is stuck with his original fake claim of a throat full of liquid wine. He can’t keep changing phony claims each time one gets debunked. He needs to be held accountable for his original phony claims.
Buster cites more garbage from the discredited liar Sharon Lawrence for his only major source of information. Some reporter she was, who never reported “the most important story of life” in 1970. But we all know there never was any “story” since she made up the fake Thurston quote in her 2001 book.
It has already been told to Buster that hundreds of reporters were in London from all over the world talking to Thurston about Jimi’s death. Thurston wouldn’t only choose one obscure reporter like Jack Meehan to give information to when all the major news organizations were there to talk to him. If the “imbibed wine” claim was real, every news organization would have been told and it would have been reported. Since nobody reported it we know Sharon Lawrence lied again with another one of her made up quotes in her fiction book.
Buster is not to be taken seriously when he changes fake stories like he does after one gets refuted.
John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed any wine on Jimi or on the bed at the flat. They never witnessed any “hard plug of vomit” either. But Buster will lie some more with his words games telling us vomit really means “pools of wine” and dry vomit is really a “hard plug”. The truth is that insane people see and believe in things that don’t exist. There were no wine on the bed or hard plugs of vomit. These men never said that but Buster is inventing fake things that do not exist.
Buster, who poured the wine down Jimi’s throat as you claim? Jeffery was in Spain so did he do it?
Who shoved the pills down Jimi’s throat as you claimed? Jeffery was in Spain so who did it?
Buster, do you believe that Jimi committed suicide and was born at a family friend’s house like Sharon Lawrence printed in her book that you get all your information out of?
Why didn’t John Saua and Reginal Jones describe a massive wine drowning in their testimony when you claimed a “waterboarding murder scene” with “pure wine” all over the bed?
If you can’t answer these simple questions you don’t have a “murder” claim.
Spot on & correct on all counts, Buster……….
I posted this above, but I will reiterate again here:
“JASON says: If there was wine witnessed at the flat, the ambulance men would have testified to witnessing wine. They both said nothing about wine and only said vomit each time. Red wine wouldn’t be hard to miss especially when you lied claiming “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed” and there was a “waterboarding wine murder”. If there was that much wine as you claimed, don’t you think Jones and Saua would have testified to witnessing “massive wine” on the bed? There was no wine, which is why they never even said the word. The phony wine claims you peddle came after their testimonies were told. So, that’s how we know there was no wine. You are trying to play word games looking for excuses for wine. Sorry, no wine was found.”
THAT, is nothing more than an assumption made by Jason & proves absolutely NOTHING. Well, guess what? The assumption can just as easily be made that if the ambulance men had been asked directly about the wine (which they never were), that they would have confirmed it, based off of what Dr. Bannister and Dr. Seifert said about it, as well as Dr. Brown stating that Jimi had a “a bit too much to drink”. So that counter-assumption right there shows that Jason’s assumption proves NOTHING.
It just more evasive blather trying to get around the obvious question of “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink, at all?”, if there was “no wine” as Jason keeps spewing out of his ass? Jason can’t answer that question with any of his long-winded blather.
Jason also blatantly lies with this:
“JASON says:
October 18, 2019 at 2:35 pm
Brown said that 40 years later, moron. He never said “Jimi was covered in wine” and said Jimi died of a drug overdose not a “wine drowning””
The statement of Dr. Brown saying “Jimi died of a drug overdose” is another of Jason’s self-decreed fabrications that Jason is pulling out of his ass. Dr. Brown said “The supposition is that he had died from an overdose” <– the key word there is "supposition" & it's not a 100% confirmation, like Jason tries to portray. Nor does it answer the question of "what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink, at all?" if there was "no wine" as Jason keeps self-decreeing. As long as Jason continues to leave that question unanswered — which will be indefinitely, as Jason cannot provide an answer to it — then all of Jason's other blather can be easily dismissed.
Flyswatter is still sniveling for the wine he can never find. It is obvious moron. If all that “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed, as Buster lied about, it would have been seen and testified to by both ambulance men. They gave a perfect and very graphically detailed description of the brown vomit they witnessed and “wine” was never ever mentioned. Their testimony came before all your phony wine claims started being made. So we know since they never said “wine” there never was any.
Both men never said there was a “wine drowning”. That would be obvious with the scene Buster lied about. Nobody could ever miss a “waterboarding murder scene” like Buster lied about. So no, that is not an assumption.
Reginal Jones clearly stated to Kathy Etchingham that Hendrix choked. He never said he was “drowned in wine”.
Officer Ian Smith said he received a lot of drug overdose calls to Kathy. Hendrix was a drug overdose not a “wine drowning”
Bob Brown said Hendrix inhaled vomit and died from a drug overdose. Brown never ever said Hendrix was “drowned in wine” or even hinted that he was. So, you lose your phony claim on just that alone.
3 professional men (ambulance and police) at the flat refute your phony claims.
Bob Brown refutes your phony claims.
Dr. Thurston refuted your phony claims with his official report. He never ever reported anything about wine like Lawrence lied about in another one of her phony quotes in her fiction book.
You can now only claim a dry throat with vomit. You have no “throat full of flooded wine” like Buster lied about. You have no 5 bottles of wine to account for. So you have no “wine drowning” claim.
All these professional men refute your bogus claims but be glad that you still have fake Sharon Lawrence quotes you can peddle.
These issues need to addressed. Dr Seifert made two conflicting statements about Jimi at the time he was brought into casualty. In one statement he says Jimi was DOA and he pounded his chest for a few moments but Jimi was clearly beyond help. Then in another statement he says that Jimi was not quite dead when brought in and they worked on him because he was unconscious. It’s particularly curious that Dr. Seifert does not recall a Dr.Bannister working under him at St Mary’s hospital. At no stage does he mention seeing copious amounts of red wine; this has come from Bannister only. It would not be surprising if Dr. Brown saw some wine as Jimi had drunk wine earlier in the evening at the two parties he attended. The dry vomit would not have been there if Jimi was drowned in red wine, and Dr. Teare would not have found the remains of a partially digested meal if Jimi was full of five bottles of wine as claimed by Bannister. It is illegal to withhold any sort of information by ambulance workers in their line of work as it is illegal for doctors to tamper with a dead body before being handed over to the coroner for the autopsy. Dr.Teare saw no copious amounts of red wine during the autopsy and stated that Jimi died of inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. If Jimi died of water boarding then this would have been highly visible to Dr.Teare and the rest of the doctors in casualty and the cause of death would have differed completely to what was written on the death certificate. This is plain common sense but unfortunately tin foil hatters don’t operate this way. If any of the parties suspected foul play or murder then this would have been reported and investigated further before the body was handed over for the autopsy. Nothing observed that morning gave anyone any reason to believe it was murder and not a drug overdose. The ambulance officers attended many of these in those days as they both said and neither suspected that this was any different from the other overdoses they were called out to.
The fact remains is that no wine was witnessed at the flat by anybody. All of the testimony from these men proves it was drugs and not a wine drowning. Kathy agress with their testimony. That ends their phony wine claim.
Ian Smith never witnessed a wine drowning. He said “he got a lot of calls like that in those days”. Those calls were not wine drownings. They were drug overdoses.
Reginal Jones said Hendrix choked on vomit. Saua said he thought it was an overdose. No wine mentioned or witnessed by 3 men who saw Hendrix dead before any doctor. Wine hoaxers can’t claim wine after the fact.
Bob Brown never witnessed a “wine drowning”. Brown said it was an overdose. There is no documentation of anything about wine or massive wine removal on Hendrix. Bob Brown spoke to the media on 9/18/70 and if Hendrix was covered in wine he would have stated he was.
Wine hoaxers have no answer for why their phony wine claims were never addressed to the media by the doctors on 9/18/70. It was confirmed to be an overdose. Why wouldn’t they say a wine drowning? The answer is simple. There wasn’t any.
Wine hoaxers have no evidence of wine. And until they can provide evidence of wine they have no claim. The fact remains that forensic analysis proved there never was a wine drowning.
BUSTER says: The murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder.
This phony claim is all we need to prove that there never was a Hendrix “wine drowning”.
Make no mistake about it folks, a vivid scene with all this wine all over the place would be easily visible to anybody that entered the flat. Professional medical attendants and the police could tell right off the bat something was amiss and would begin an immediate investigation. Officer Ian Smith would see the extreme amount of wine soaked with Hendrix dead on the bed having no choice but to seal off the flat as a crime scene.
A scene like this would be very unusual and would warrant in investigation in any circumstance. Police could not ignore tons of wine soaked on top and around a dead man laying on his back on a bed. So yes, something as brutal as a “waterboarding murder scene” would be investigated without any question.
If you read any of the testimonies from ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua, they clearly do not describe anything of this nature. Both men gave an honest and accurate description of everything they witnessed going into graphic detail about vomit on Hendrix and the pilows. Neither of these men mentioned the word “wine” or even alluded to the fact that any alcohol was involved. Nothing about wine or alcohol was ever stated by either men.
Wouldn’t you think they would have at least said something about wine with a brutal “waterboarding murder scene” involving gallons of wine? All that gallons of wine sure wouldn’t be hard to miss with it flooding the bed in giant “pools”. But not a peep from these men about wine. They certainly would have went into graphic detail about the wine as well as the vomit since the massive amount of red wine would be obvious. So, why did Reginal Jones and John Saua not say anything about wine? There was never any wine on the bed that’s why. If there was, that’s the first thing they would have testified to.
So, since these men never mentioned wine in a supposed “wineboarding murder scene” we know there was no wine ever involved. Jones talks about brown vomit on the pillows and Saua talks about dry vomit in Hendrix. Nothing about wine flooding in Hendrix’s mouth and throat or soaked on his body. Plus everything that these men described is the result of what a drug overdose looks like with all the brown vomit from the reaction of Jimi’s body rejecting the overdose of pills. Nothing red was ever mentioned which is the visible color of red wine since Buster the clown lied and said “pure red wine” was poured all over in large quantities.
“To tell the truth, I thought it was an overdose.” – John Saua
John Saua makes it very clear he thought it was a drug overdose. Never said one word about an alcohol related death or a “wine drowning” that would be obvious. Saua saw many drug overdoses and recognized this one as well.
Hearing the testimonies from these men, they are not alarmed of considering anything was of foul play, but only an accidental death in which they wished there was more that they could do to help.
Well, I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out, I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it.” – John Saua
Saua again talks about dry vomit and not wet wine that would be present in a “wine drowning”.
Anything wine related would have been mentioned and these men never witnessed anything severe as a brutal “wine drowning” since they were describing everything they witnessed in meticulous detail.
“Sit him up! No luv, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked- “Reginal Jones
Reginal Jones clearly states that Hendrix choked on vomit and was not drowned in wine as tin foil hatters lie about. If there was a visible wine drowning, Jones would have said so.
“We really answered a lot of calls like that in those days.”- Officer Ian Smith
Ian Smith said he answered a lot of calls like that in those days. Those calls sure wasn’t massive wine drownings, they were drug overdoses that were routine in 1970. Smith didn’t make it a crime scene just for that reason since it was an overdose. And it’s been confirmed by all these men.
Make no mistake about it folks, this is the actual death scene. All this wine should be there to be witnessed by all these men. All this wine should be graphically detailed of a wine soaked Hendrix with a flooded bed of wine. The wine would have been the only thing these men talked about never witnessing something so bizarre in their life. The flat would have been made a crime scene for something so unusual like this. But nope, not a single word about any massive wine by any witnesses there. Not even the slightest hint of wine was mentioned. They all described what they witnessed as a drug overdose and never a wine drowning. This is clearly obvious to anybody reading who has an ounce of common sense or isn’t a demented nut like the wine clown.
Wine hoaxers can’t claim a wine drowning until they can find wine at the flat. After the fact wine claims can’t be made since no wine was witnessed at the actual death scene.
The hoax is over folks. All the evidence witnessed by professionals proves it to be a routine drug overdose. No massive wine drowning was ever witnessed or described. That’s how we know there is no truth to these phony claims. If there was this huge wine scene it would have been investigated right from the start. Once again, this wine hoax gets debunked.
JASON, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
”Wine hoaxers can’t claim a wine drowning until they can find wine at the flat. After the fact wine claims can’t be made since no wine was witnessed at the actual death scene.
The hoax is over folks. All the evidence witnessed by professionals proves it to be a routine drug overdose. No massive wine drowning was ever witnessed or described. That’s how we know there is no truth to these phony claims. If there was this huge wine scene it would have been investigated right from the start. Once again, this wine hoax gets debunked.”
TRANSLATED: Jason can’t answer the question of “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink, at all?” if there was “no wine” as Jason keeps self-decreeing. If Dr. Brown saw the wine, then so did the ambulance men — there’s no getting around that no matter how deep Jason digs into his own ass for his self-decreed fabrications.
The real hoax is Jason’s decree of “no wine”, which he can’t provide any substance or credible reference sources to back up his “no wine” hoax.
Brown said it was an overdose. Brown never said he witnessed wine or that is was a wine drowning, moron. No ambulance man testified to witnessing wine. Go snivel some more. All you do is repeat the same garbage.
As long as Brown said it was an overdose and there was no revival possible your phony claim is destroyed.
Your claim is that there was a wine drowning with half hour procedures done.
Bob Brown refuted that.
Hi Jason. These two hoaxers go on and on about the wine drowning but never mention who exactly did the waterboarding. Tin foil hatters relied heavily on Wright’s book but this was uncovered to be a lie since Michael Jeffrey was in Spain and the author admitted he made the whole thing up. Bannister is the only one to mention wine years later. They also suggested Monika was involved as a cold calculating intel operative but she lost it completely with her screaming fit at Jimi at Harvey’s place after Jimi showed interest in another girl. This is the behaviour of an obsessive woman and not a murderer. I have asked Buster numerous times to disclose his sources and reveal who the murderer actually was. I’ve also noticed these two hoaxers no longer mention Tappy Wright, Michael Jeffrey, Bob Levine, Albert Allen after we questioned the reliability and credibility of their stories. The agenda here is to prove that Jimi was murdered although none of the attendants that morning saw it as such to them it was a clear case of an overdose. Just where did the copious amounts of wine come from if none was witnessed that morning. I know the vivid imaginations of these two hoaxers and the people they place their faith and trust in. Kathy has repeatedly said she does not believe Jimi was murdered if the attendants witnessed anything out of the ordinary they would have raised their concerns and had this investigated further. How tin foil hatters get around it is by saying everyone was coerced into changing their stories. Of course this is all speculation and not evidence. They use pseudo scientific jargon, debunked stories and rhetorical language to push their case and cause but it’s all just empty nonsense. If a murder did take place no evidence would have been left behind for all to see. I have got to laugh at the highly absorbent bedding that Jimi was supposedly lying on for 6 hours and this soaked up most of the wine and left only dried vomit. This is how he gets around the fact that there no was copious amount of red wine at the scene observed. What a joke; I wonder how long it took Buster to come with this one- the continual manipulation and distortion of the truth and facts.
How about focusing on the alcoholic content of Jimi’s urine which was detected because of the autopsy to be 46mgs instead of just the blood level. This is misleading and deceptive as your usual tactics are. You are also suggesting that the police officers covered up a murder scene in order to avoid filling out paperwork. Are you serious? What professional would risk their livelihood and integrity to do that and what would be gained by doing that. Kindly stop rewriting the story of what was said and observed that morning as it bears absolutely no resemblance to the actual circumstances of what really occurred that morning. You have gone from copious amounts of wine, soaked in wine, drowned in wine, filled with wine, waterboarded with wine, five bottles of wine, glasses of wine, and finally Jimi drinking wine.
What was actually seen was black and brown vomit and not copious amounts of wine at the scene that morning. The attendants would have had no reason whatsoever to fabricate or manufacture evidence or delete important information. You are painting these professionals as dishonest and untrustworthy in their witnessing and negligent in their work and ability to perform their duties and willing and ready to change their story when required to do so. Please state who the murderer was or can’t you do that since Wright’s story is a hoax. Without Wright you have no waterboarding murder since this conspiracy theory arose because of Wright’s bogus claims. Good luck with this one.
Hi Ivana,
Buster is full of crap as we all know, and his junior sidekick is a wannabe. They have no case, otherwise they wouldn’t need to invent their own fake versions of stories that never existed. Then they make up their own fake testimony for the ambulance men claiming “hard plugs of vomit” and “wine” when they said only dry vomit.
Everybody was “gotten to” according to Buster and it was a “cover up”. I’m surprised he doesn’t say Jeffery put on the super absorbent sheets lol.
They have a large cast of characters they insinuate are the “killers” but never can say who it was.
The hoaxers were screwed when they found out Jeffery was in Spain and have been scrambling ever since to concoct a new claim but they all contradict each other.
Also, no wine at the flat makes their blood boil. That’s why they invented new phony claims like the absurd hard plug of vomit that gushed wine like a fountain for Fraud Bannister.
Buster has no idea what claim he wants to stick with it changes for each comment he makes.
Kathy doesn’t believe any of this nonsense and she did real research and an investigation.
Trying to use Siefert is hilarious since he already said he saw no wine.
No wine at the flat means no wine drowning.
Well, there’s another long load of bullshit from Jason where he tries to infer his deliberate misquoting of the emergency professionals somehow saves him from giving a straight answer to why Dr Brown said Jimi had too much to drink or how Dr Siefert’s admission that Jimi was covered in red wine affects the evidence…No matter how many times Jason tries to dishonestly implant false meaning in to the witnessing of the emergency personnel he still hasn’t made any attempt to answer the most incriminating evidence…Jason is clearly mentally ill so not having a normal sense of reality he deludes himself that he is getting away with ignoring Siefert confirming Dr Bannister’s witnessing of Jimi being soaked in pure wine…Dr Bannister said that Monika’s scarf that was around Jimi’s neck was saturated in wine and his afro had pure wine soaking it like a sponge…Jason also ignores that we have Monika herself admitting that she poured wine on Jimi…Jason tries to dishonestly get around Monika’s admission by saying its source, Sharon Lawrence, wasn’t credible…But seeing how Jason denies all the main witnesses and calls them all liars and hoaxers we can easily see who is the liar here and who is not reliable…Jason has to be a nut to insult the intelligence of the readers by thinking they don’t see him as the unbanned internet troll, who is unfairly being allowed to troll serious researchers unimpeded, that he is…The reality mentally ill Jason is ignoring is that there is a video out there where Dr Siefert says “Jimi was covered in red wine”…That video, of course, totally refutes the nay-saying little piss Jason who tried to con us with “Dr Siefert never witnessed any wine”…Turns out he did and Jason is lying…The real facts proven by that video prove that Siefert corroborated Bannister and the little poisonous denier Jason can’t account for it so he ignores it and tries to troll around it with more disingenuous trolling…
The way Jason tries to dishonestly get around Siefert and Bob Brown’s confirmation of Bannister is by inserting a false context to the emergency personnels’ witnessing at the Samarkand…In Jason’s mentally ill mind it is OK to assert that any witnessing at the hospital has to be identically repeated at the Samarkand…If not, then everything can be rejected and Jason can just insert his false overdose claim…Jason would have to be nuts to think anyone would be dumb enough to fall for that stupid ruse…But Jason doesn’t care…He has no respect for the readers and doesn’t care what you think of his false methodology…There’s no credible person who reads this thread who would come to any other conclusion than Jason is not here for serious purposes and is just going to jam the thread with bullshit in order to get around the obvious…He himself knows he is constructing a false analysis framework in order to force his lies over everything else and pretend he is serious…
Jason achieves this by creating a parallel argument that the emergency personnel at the Samarkand never mentioned wine specifically…This is a bad ripping of context by Jason that is being deliberately done…If you are reading this “debate” Jason completely ignored the fact that Jimi lay for 6 hours on very absorbent bedding and pillows that would have soaked-up most of the wine and left only dried vomit…Like I said before, if you want to know what is the good evidence look at what Jason ignores…Jason ignores the fact that those ambulance men are focused on first aid and applying procedures that help the victim survive…They do not step back and do a football game referee appraisal of the death scene, they try to save the victim…Jason is creating a fraudulent context that retroactively applies all the medical witnessing at the hospital, the information from the Inquest, and educated research, to the scene at the Samarkand where it doesn’t apply…The ambulance men were focused on getting an airway established…It is clear from their statements that they failed due to a hard plug of vomit their equipment could not penetrate…Jason is a liar and the real context of what he cites is the emergency personnel did notice the wine when they described it as a large “pool” of vomit…As usual Jason mentions that pool in his bullshit denial speech-making but never really answers or addresses it in any credible way…In any case, the wine Siefert commented about was that same wine by necessary REALITY…
But let’s get back to what Jason ignores again…Jason is contemptuously ignoring that it is impossible for persons like Jimi, with a famous tolerance for barbiturates, to overdose on only 9 Vesparax tablets…But it is even more impossible for such a person to overdose and choke on vomit in only 1 or 2 hours…Jason is ignoring that I have put a firm timeline to this that was backed by the witnesses and top pathologist Dr Rufus Crompton…Jason is hoping you are dumb enough to let him lead you around with his lies…He’s hoping you will not notice that he’s ignoring and not answering the fact the head pathologist in England at the time said Jimi died no later than 5:30am…This correct determination by Crompton brackets the timeline and therefore the drug forensics…In his con man hustle Jason is hoping you won’t notice he is running from the most intelligent evidence and trying to get away with ignoring it…Jason does this on purpose because his denial trolling depends on reducing the debate to the most overly-simplified terms where he can get away with his lies more easily by not conflicting with the most intelligent evidence…But you can’t get away with that in the real world and just because Jason ignores it doesn’t mean he doesn’t have to account for it…If you ignore good evidence you lose…Jason is claiming Jimi died of a barbiturate overdose and choked on his vomit…However Jason is ignoring the provable forensic evidence that shows that is impossible…
One of the most important things Jason ignored was the fact the ambulance men stated Jimi was covered in an unusual amount of vomit…The liar Jason mis-quotes the ambulance men saying Jimi was one of many ordinary overdose cases they had been called to…But Jason ignores their making a point to mention the grotesque amount of vomit that made Jimi’s death scene unique…Jason cannot account for the FACT that persons with Jimi’s tolerance with not vomit-out like that only 1 to 2 hours after taking 9 Vesparax…The vomiting was anomalous to normal Vesparax overdoses but in Jimi’s case, because of his tolerance, it was forensically-conflicting…The reason for that is because the Vesparax was not what caused Jimi to vomit…What caused Jimi to vomit was the extraordinary amount of wine that was poured down his throat that caused his body to do one last survival surge of vomiting…This must be the case because we have proven forensically that it could not be the result of the barbiturate…Jason is forced to ignore this because he knows it refutes his idiotic denial and proves Jimi was murdered…But all Jason is doing is ignoring irrefutable proof of homicide that he still has to answer whether he ignores it or not…Jason will not be able to find any other Vesparax overdose case where the victim vomited-out so profusely in only 1 or 2 hours after taking 9 tablets…The fact he can’t answer it is why it is proof…
It is pathetic to see Jason try to get away with his end-around of forcing false context on the emergency personnel while never answering all the firm proof I’ve cited here…Quite pathetic…Jason refuses to answer Dr Siefert’s witnessing of Jimi being covered in red wine and what it entails…He knows it proves the wine at the Samarkand and therefore proves everything he types here is complete lying bullshit…The only real matter here is why a sick troll still remains unbanned…
JASON, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
”October 20, 2019 at 2:57 am
If all that “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed, as Buster lied about, it would have been seen and testified to by both ambulance men. They gave a perfect and very graphically detailed description of the brown vomit they witnessed and “wine” was never ever mentioned. Their testimony came before all your phony wine claims started being made. So we know since they never said “wine” there never was any.
Both men never said there was a “wine drowning”. That would be obvious with the scene Buster lied about. Nobody could ever miss a “waterboarding murder scene” like Buster lied about. So no, that is not an assumption.”
TRANSLATED: Jason can’t answer the question of “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink, at all?” if there was “no wine” as Jason keeps self-decreeing.
Jason further displays his idiocy with his statement of “Both men never said there was a “wine drowning”. That would be obvious with the scene Buster lied about.”
How the hell would stomach and lungs filled with wine and a blood alcohol content of .005% be obvious to the ambulance men? What was obvious was the profuse amount of vomit and a ‘pool’ of it. They told of what they saw prior to Jimi being worked on at the hospital and the autopsy 3 days later & the ambulance men never stated anywhere that they didn’t see any wine. If Dr. Brown, Dr. Seifert, and Dr. Bannister saw it, then the ambulance men saw it.
JASON, the lying-denying pig-breeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
”Make no mistake about it folks, a vivid scene with all this wine all over the place would be easily visible to anybody that entered the flat. Professional medical attendants and the police could tell right off the bat something was amiss and would begin an immediate investigation. Officer Ian Smith would see the extreme amount of wine soaked with Hendrix dead on the bed having no choice but to seal off the flat as a crime scene.
A scene like this would be very unusual and would warrant in investigation in any circumstance. Police could not ignore tons of wine soaked on top and around a dead man laying on his back on a bed. So yes, something as brutal as a “waterboarding murder scene” would be investigated without any question.”
This was already explained by reference of Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes” that the police did not declare it a crime scene because they didn’t want to fill out the paperwork.
And again, How the hell would stomach and lungs filled with wine and a blood alcohol content of .005% be obvious to the ambulance men or police? Not possible until after treatment at the hospital and the autopsy 3 days later
Again, Jason’s blather just translates to the obvious that Jason can’t answer the question of “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink, at all?” if there was “no wine” as Jason keeps self-decreeing.
Doctor Siefert and Bob Brown said no revival was possible and nothing else was done for Jimi. There were no “treatments”.
Dry vomit all the way down is not a wine drowning, moron.
Nobody witnessed wine at the flat.
There was no “crime scene” to declare cuz there was no wine.
No lungs were flooded with wine cuz the autopsy showed no massive wine in the lungs left behind
Excuses, excuses, excuses and same old phony claims…..and now a new phony claim from Buster the clown!
There were medical professionals and police at the flat who never witnessed a “homicide”. They witnessed a routine overdose. There was no evidence of a “massive wine drowning” as you claim.
The only mentally ill person is you, wanting Jimi Hendrix to be murdered based on phony debunked claims as you get outraged when you are proven wrong, and then you make up more absurd claims.
Now we have a brand new phony claim from Buster the clown….the super absorbent sheets that magically soak up the wine that instantly reappears for Bannister 21 years later. Guess you thought of that right before you posted. All the readers can have another good laugh.
Did Jeffery put on the sheets to cover up the massive wine drowning you claimed?
Quit whining, I can post here just like Justin said, he isn’t going to ban cuz you demand.
You’ve thoroughly embarrassed yourself with your lies and phony claims as each one contradicts each other. That is your own fault. Nobody takes what you say seriously. Funny how you write in an “authoritative” tone pretending to be an expert.
Anyone can read my posts and then read Jason’s responses and see he’s trolling and avoiding answering the provable evidence I’ve spelled-out…He knows he’s doing that because if you see his wording above he is basically saying “Yeah I’m trolling but Justin already said he would allow it”…
Jason moronically runs roughshod across the evidence because he tries to get away with conflating the wine that was inside Jimi with the wine that was on his exterior…Anyone with credible knowledge of the evidence would know that the wine Jason is trolling and repeatedly failing to answer for in his trolling responses was divided in to wine that was on Jimi’s exterior and wine that was blocked inside his lungs and stomach by a hard plug of vomit in his throat…Because Jason is mentally ill he doesn’t realize he just shot himself in the foot by not realizing the wine absorbed by the bedding would not cancel the wine Dr Bannister witnessed, since they are clearly two different things…Wine that disappears in to the absorbent bedding does not mean the wine inside Jimi’s body disappears along with it so Jason is making yet another idiotic claim without being held accountable for it…If this were being done on the court room basis Jason pretends to call for as far as evidence but then ignores when it comes to answering for his moronic arguments he would quickly be kicked out of court as being a nut…
Jason is hand-waving and ridiculing instead of giving a credible answer to the FACT Jimi lay dead on the bed for 6 hours and the wine that was part of the “pool” of vomit, that Jason is contemptuously denying, evaporated and got absorbed in to that bed fabric for those 6 hours… Jason is clearly mentally ill because while his trolling answer shows he can’t give any answer to this that doesn’t stop him from saying I am being laughed at by an imaginary gallery that is only in Jason’s head…Jason is unable to answer this as his reply shows, yet in his mind he’s walking away with a win even though the scoreboard shows he could give no response to this correct evidence…The only thing Jason can do in response is show what an idiot he is by trying to say the exterior wine that soaked in to the bed magically re-appeared for Bannister inside Jimi’s lungs and stomach…But that’s not how reality works and those two things are clearly separate things…So the long and the short of it is Jason has once again badly failed to answer for evidence he can’t answer and tries to, once again, evade with a stupid response…That explains why the death scene would not show overt wine but did instead show dried vomit…Perfectly explainable with Jason coming up way short in public with any credible answer for it while at the same time trollishly declaring victory anyway and making a really stupid argument to justify it…
By the way, Jason once again dodged answering Dr Siefert’s comment that “Jimi was covered in red wine”…
No, people can just see you’re full of crap again making up more b.s. stories for your imaginary wine.
You don’t post any evidence, you make crap up off the top of your head and string together bogus stories.
Who poured the wine inside Jimi?
Ambulance man John Saua gave a very detailed and graphic testimony of what he witnessed at the flat on 9/18/70 viewing the Hendrix death scene. This man was honest and made sure to include everything that he witnessed that day being careful not to leave anything out. Most importantly, John Saua never said a single thing about “wine” or an alcohol related death regarding Jimi Hendrix. Saua never witnessed Jimi being “covered in wine” or witnessed any wine flowing from his mouth like these fraudsters claim. The only thing this man witnessed was dry vomit due to a barbiturate overdose. Saua never alluded to Hendrix being “murdered” or anything that was unusual or suspicious about his death. Saua had been around drug overdoses before and recognize this as well. All the men who were interviewed gave a similar detailed account and not one of them ever testified to witnessing any wine on or inside of Hendrix.
Wine hoaxers try to claim that Hendrix was “covered in wine” at the hospital. Jimi was not “covered in wine” at the flat witnessed by three men before he was taken to the hospital. It is impossible to claim he was “covered in wine” later when he was covered in vomit first at the flat. On 9/18/70 Jimi was still covered in vomit at the hospital. It wasn’t until January 1992 until Fraud Bannister started making his notorious claims of wine. After that the wine hoaxers were in business.
We have the testimony of Ambulance Man John Saua who accurately detailed what he witnessed.
“Well, I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out, I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it. The aspirators in those days were all right, but not like you have today. They couldn’t shift that lot.
We knew it was hopeless. There was no pulse, no respiration. We got down to the flat and there was nobody but the body on the bed, we had to radio for the police from the van, and we couldn’t touch anything in the flat. As I say we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed, but I didn’t recognize him. I don’t know if any anybody would’ve recognized him. His own mother wouldn’t have recognized him. He was in a pool of vomit, it was everywhere.
But we are not doctors and it’s our job to keep trying till we get them to the hospital. We can’t proclaim anyone dead…so as soon as the police arrived we were off. I was in the back with Jimi, Reg Jones drove. When we moved him the gasses were gurgling. You get that when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant. The vomit was all the way down. We couldn’t have got an airway down. He was flat on his back when we got there. It’s a shame he wasn’t on his side because he might have pulled through.”- John Saua
Here in the graphic detailed testimony of John Saua he tells us that he witnessed vomit. Nowhere does he ever mention wine. Wine would not be an issue, since there was never any wine there. All the phony wine claims weren’t being manufactured yet so we get a true accurate account of what was there.
John Saua says the vomit was dry all the way down. Saua says nothing about a “hard plug of vomit” that he needed to rush Hendrix to get to the hospital to remove.
Buster the clown continues to lie playing fraudulent word games. Saua never states the vomit was “hard”. He says it was dry.
I guess Buster the clown believes that dry vomit could become harder than granite to keep imaginary wine from gushing out so he can still make his phony wine claim. The guy has mental issues.
Saua specifically states dry vomit all the way down which means there was no “wine drowning” since wine would be flowing out of Hendrix’s mouth. Buster the clown lied and said Hendrix was filled full of wine to full capacity with wine spilling out of his mouth. Well, John Saua witnessed no such thing and that debunks the phony wine claim.
Saua also never says anything about a “hard plug of vomit”. Buster needs to lie and make this fake claim up since it’s only way left to still claim wine. Buster thinks he still can hoax the reading public with word games claiming hard vomit prevented Saua from seeing the wine. Then the wine clown claims that Bannister broke it through and out gushed the wine. What a load of crap. We know that ain’t true since Dr. Siefert and Dr. Brown said Hendrix had no extensive procedures ever done. Hendrix was hooked up to the monitor, it was flat, Siefert pounded his heart twice and that was it. Nothing more was ever done. So, Buster was caught in another lie and loses all his phony claims. No “hard plug of vomit” or a removal at the hospital.
BUSTER says: murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed
JASON says: Buster the clown lied and said “pure wine was spilled all over the bed” covering Hendrix. John Saua never said anything about “pure wine” on the bed or wine on Hendrix. All Saua said there was a pool of vomit. Nothing about alcohol or wine. Buster the clown now tries to claim that the “pool” means “wine” as he still desperately clings to his fake wine claim. Saua said nothing about referring to wine. Just another lie as he perpetrates this wine hoax.
If all this wine was spilled on the bed, Saua would have described it in his testimony. He detailed everything else and he wouldn’t miss red wine poured all over the bed. So, the fact Saua never mentions wine at all means there never was any wine drowning.
Buster can snivel all he wants crying that “Sharon Lawrence told me this…..”. The fact is Sharon Lawrence is a confirmed liar and John Saua is not. He was there in person at the death scene to witness it first hand. Buster the clown and Sharon Lawrence were not. Also, no doctor was there either. So, Saua’s testimony stands as accurate and outweighs anybody else since he witnessed Hendrix dead first. No wine at the flat means no wine later.
The fact remains that John Saua never testified to witnessing wine anywhere. So, these frauds have to invent wine anyway they can. So, Buster plays word games saying a “pool” means wine and dry vomit means “a hard plug of vomit”. Sorry, Buster the clown can’t make up his own words inventing fake wine that doesn’t exist. This is fraudulent and these frauds can only use shady tricks attempting to pull off their phony wine claim. The reading public knows his con game and are too smart for shady tricks.
John Saua only witnessed dry vomit and fraudsters can’t make up words for his testimony. Saua never said wine or a “hard plug of vomit”. Fraudsters can’t alter his testimony no matter how hard they try.
This testimony of John Saua debunks the fraudulent claims of a wine drowning by Buster the clown and his junior sidekick.
BUSTER says: Dr. Siefert said “Jimi was covered in wine”.
JASON says: Buster has seriously downgraded his phony wine “murder” claim. He started with Jimi’s throat flooded with wine spilling out of his mouth at the flat. But he has abandoned that phony claim and changed it to a “hard plug of vomit” that he just totally made up. John Saua never said he witnessed a “hard plug of vomit”. Yet Buster keeps lying claiming he said it. Buster also tries to claim that brown vomit means “red wine”. He claims a “pool” is wine when not one ambulance man said the word wine. This guy is clearly crazy making up things that doesn’t exist just to feed his wine delusion.
Now Buster wants to use Dr. Siefert who is already on the record stating that he “detected no alcohol on Jimi”. So, Buster the clown is willing to use any means possible to prove his phony wine claim. This is both desperate and pathetic.
Buster is already on the record stating that Dr Siefert is discredited. So Buster can’t change his position trying to now use Siefert to prove his phony wine claim. All one has to do is see that Siefert said “he detected on alcohol on Jimi” and we have a serious contradiction.
Buster also has another couple of problems. Trying to claim “Jimi was covered in wine” is not the same thing as Jimi’s “mouth and throat flooded with wine” as Buster first claimed. Wine on Jimi is not the same thing as wine inside Jimi. So, the phony wine claim still cannot be proven.
We already have expert witness testimony coming from Ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua who witnessed no wine on Jimi at the flat. Both men witnessed no wine spilling out of Jimi’s mouth or flooding his throat. They only witnessed dry vomit in Hendrix’s throat. There can’t be a wine drowning when no wine was witnessed at the death scene. No wine on the bed, no wine on Hendrix, no wine flooding his throat. And Buster the clown, member of the insane clown posse, can’t try to lie and use his new phony “hard plug of vomit” story to still claim wine cuz that was never testified to by anyone.
When no wine was ever witnessed or testified to at the flat, wine hoaxers can’t claim wine after the fact. That is impossible. If there was all this wine at the flat as the wine hoaxers claim, then at least one of those men would have testified to witnessing red wine. 3 men testified and not one said a word about red wine, not a word about Jimi being covered in wine, not one word about red wine on the bed, not one word about Jimi being flooded with wine inside. These testimonies came before all the fake wine claims started with Bannister, so you know there is no wine when it was never stated.
Also, these men never alluded to anything they considered foul play like a wine drowning. They all wished they could have done something for Jimi but there was nothing to be done. Saua said it looked like an overdose, Jones said he choked on vomit, and Smith said he got a lot of overdose calls. All the evidence and testimony proves exactly that. These men weren’t out writing books for money, they were sought out and the carefully detailed what they witnessed and not one man said Hendrix was “murdered” or drowned in wine. They saw the death scene folks, these phony “authors” and doctors did not. When no wine was ever witnessed or testified to at the death scene, wine cannot be claimed over 20 years later after the fact.
The death scene is the most important factor since this is where Hendrix died. Wine hoaxers claim this massive wine drowning scene. Nobody at the flat ever witnessed a scene like this. Many police were there and never witnessed a wine drowning scene. John Saua and Reginal Jones who were the first men to see Hendrix dead never saw any wine. No wine was never witnessed by them. So, when no wine is witnessed or testified to by these men at the actual death scene, then wine hoaxers can’t claim wine after the fact. Wine cannot magically appear later when it wasn’t present at the flat. Then we have Buster the clown trying to play word games pathetically trying to still claim wine.
If Hendrix was actually “murdered” in a wine drowning it would be easily proven. These jokers wouldn’t have to resort to changing their phony claims in every other comment, playing word games, and refusing to say who actually “murdered” Hendrix. This proves this is nothing but a hoax.
BUSTER says: Monika poured wine on Jimi.
JASON says: So again, Buster downgrades his phony “wine drowning” claim. He uses a quote from his fraud hero Sharon Lawrence that he read out of her fiction book. And with that, Buster becomes a self proclaimed “foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix”. Laughable it is for someone to be so ignorant.
Let’s inform Buster again that Monika pouring wine on Jimi, still doesn’t get him his fake wine drowning since no wine is inside Jimi. John Saua and Reginal Jones witnessed only dry vomit inside Jimi. They never witnessed wine spilling out of his mouth or flooding his throat like Buster originally lied about. No wine was ever witnessed, so Buster the clown has no wine to claim.
Also, John Saua and Reginal Jones never mentioned wine on Hendrix or on the bed. They both graphically described dry and brown vomit all over but never graphically described “red wine” that should be there if all this wine Buster claims was there. They went into graphic detail about everything. They certainly would describe wine if it was there. There was no wine there which is why it was never mentioned.
And no Buster, dry vomit is not “hard plugs” and brown vomit is not “red wine”. A “pool” is not “red wine” either when Jones graphically described the vomit as being brown. You cannot lie your way into your fake theory making up words and claims that these men never said. You are a fraud and you lie to push your debunked hoax. The men never described “hard plugs of vomit” or “pure wine spilled all over the bed” like you lied about. If “a hard plug” and pure wine” was visible these men would have graphically described it in detail.
So, we have another bogus claim from the already discredited Sharon Lawrence who already lied about Jimi committing suicide and claiming Jimi was born at a family friend’s house. Don’t forget the whopper she told when she lied about Dr Thurston and the phony ‘imbibed wine’ quote.
Monika stated she wiped or washed Jimi’s face with wine. That’s not pouring it all over him. Also, didn’t Eric Burdon tell Monika to wake Hendrix up with coffee or splashing his face with water? Did Monika use the wine intending to wake up Hendrix with? Is that what she “poured on him” to wake him up with? And the wine hoaxers take it out of context to claim a “wine drowning”? Is this the wine that was claimed to be covering Jimi? Just something to think about.
Nice story to imagine, but we still have two ambulance men who never witnessed Jimi being covered in wine. They witnessed him being covered in vomit. They never saw wine inside Hendrix either. So, no wine was witnessed at the flat.
“We really answered a lot of calls like that in those days” – Officer Ian Smith .
We also have Officer Ian Smith who clearly stated that Hendrix was a casualty of a drug overdose since he received a lot of of drug overdose calls in those days. Officer Ian Smith knew a regular overdose when he saw one. Officer Smith never witnessed a massive “wine drowning” at the flat or witnessed anything that resembled foul play. If he witnessed a scene like Buster the clown described, Smith would have sealed off the flat and made it a crime scene.
“He was covered in vomit.” – Reginal Jones
Reginal Jones confirms that Hendrix was covered in vomit. Not one word about red wine. If Hendrix was “covered in wine” Jones would have testified to witnessing red wine. Wine hoaxers have a serious problem. Jones says vomit and not wine. Jimi can’t be a magic quick change artist and change into wine later. So, Jones refutes every after the fact wine claim that started in 1992. No, vomit cannot be claimed as wine like these frauds do each and every time.
“Well, that’s not how I remember things. If she’d been in the flat they would have never called us to come in. They could have just taken him off, but in the circumstances, you know – just the body. Well they I radioed their control to get us in. Also he would have been identified – nobody knew who he was” – Officer Ian Smith
.
Buster the clown swings and misses terribly at another failed pathetic attempt to claim his wine from Siefert, as Officer Ian Smith knocks it out of the park for our side.
Smith gives a very detailed description in his testimony. What he says is crucial. Smith confirms it was a drug overdose in his testimony. The only reason he was called by Saua is cuz nobody was there at the flat. If there was a serious “murder” as these wine hoaxers claim, then police would easily have been involved. Since it was a normal overdose, there would be no need for the police and Saua and Jones would have taken him away.
Hendrix was a John Doe until Stickells came to identify him at the hospital. Hendrix was a DOA when he arrived and no extensive work was performed on him. Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival. Doctor Bob Brown and Siefert stated this:
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead” – Dr. Martin Siefert
“The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible” – Doctor Bob Brown
Both Doctor Siefert and Bob Brown just hit a couple of Grand Slams for our side.
Doctor Siefert clearly states that Hendrix was already dead. The monitor was flat and the pounding of his heart was a just a formality. Nothing more was ever done for him. So, all this bullshit of wine removal, 20 minute resuscitation, and removing “hard plugs of vomit” is excatly what it is…bullshit… Siefert says it never happened.
Bob Brown clearly confirms for the record that it was indeed an overdose and never says anything about wine or a wine drowning. He also says no revial was possible. So, Brown corroborates Siefert’s testimony that no extensive work was performed on Hendrix which proves Fraud Bannister to be a liar.
We have Doctor Brown stating an overdose not a “wine drowning”. This means a doctor confirms this as a drug overdose, if he thought it was a “wine drowning” he would have said so. Brown said no revival which means no work was performed on Hendrix. Siefert also confirms that as well.
“We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead.”- Dr. Martin Siefert
Siefert tells us again that no long resuscitation attempts or wine removal were ever performed. Only a few minutes were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix. So, Bannister and wine hoaxers are easily refuted once again. Didn’t Fraud Bannister confirm that working on Hendrix was a formality? He sure did.
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – ex Doctor Bannister
Bannister even said it was a formality so it’s a trifecta with all 3 doctors confirming that Hendrix had no extensive work performed on him. Wine hoaxers can snivel as usual still crying about wine or Sharon Lawrence “telling them this” but the fact remains, all 3 doctors confirmed no work was performed on Hendrix, and no wine was ever witnessed at the flat. Ambulance men and police men confirmed to be an overdose at the flat. Bob Brown said it was an overdose and so did Thurston so another trifecta for our side. But we have more evidence that shuts out the wine hoaxers.
“Well, all I know is that Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival.” – Les Perrin “Hendrix public relations manager”
So, Les confirmed to the media on 9/18/70 that Hendrix was confirmed to be dead on
arrival This also means no extensive work was performed on Hendrix.
So, Buster the clown loses again as we get full confirmation that there was no wine at
the flat, no wine on or in Jimi. We also get a confirmed drug overdose both at the flat and hospital by medical professionals, police, and doctors. Then there is full confirmation of no extensive work performed on Hendrix by all 3 doctors.
The phony wine hoax has once again been obliterated by expert witnesses testimony and
science. Wine clowns have Sharon Lawrence quotes in her fake book, but ambulance
Men, police men, and doctors refute all of her and the sniveling wine hoaxers lies of wine.
Anyone can see that Jason is trying way too hard to deny the hard plug of vomit…That’s because he knows it is real and needs to deny it, otherwise it proves Jimi had wine corked-in to his lungs and stomach…I cannot find the quote right now, but I have seen a more detailed description of the death scene from the ambulance attendants and they explained in more detail that the sucker that was part of the ambulance equipment was not adequate to penetrate the vomit in Jimi’s throat…They clearly said in that other interview that they could not penetrate the vomit in Jimi’s throat with that ambulance sucker so they got Jimi to St Mary’s to access better equipment…Jason is trolling and trying to use dishonest semantics to get around this, but any credible reasonable person who reads that other more detailed account will realize the ambulance men could not get through the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat in order to access the wine Dr Bannister witnessed…There is a clear medical pathology contained in the ambulance men’s statements that does clearly indicate this, that mentally ill Jason is trying to lie around with dishonest quotes…Jones said “Once the police arrived we got him off to hospital”…Jones added the police got there in no time, meaning they did not work on Jimi long and could not clear that plug of vomit Jason is using trolling word games to deny…So as far as pathology, the hard plug of vomit is still there uncleared and corking-in the wine Dr Bannister would witness at hospital…Jason is offering obnoxious trolling but he hasn’t answered this basic fact that is clearly supported by all the evidence…
Jason also lied about the ambulance men thinking Jimi was an ordinary overdose…On page 180 of Kathy Etchingham’s book Jones says: ” We called the police from the radio in the ambulance, thinking he was dead and that the circumstances were strange “…
Also – to show what an easily-refuted idiot Jason is, Jason cited Crompton saying Jimi’s barbiturate liver concentrations were so high that he would have died anyway even if he hadn’t choked on vomit…However on page 182 of Kathy’s book she quotes Crompton as saying 5 Vesparax would have produced those concentrations…Jason, being a moronic troll who doesn’t pay attention to credible detail, doesn’t realize the product manufacturer listed Lethal Dose as being 9 or 10 tablets…By saying the dose could have been as low as 5 pills Dr Crompton is confirming that it would have been impossible for Jimi, with his famous tolerance, to die of any overdose from only 5 pills…Jason will ignore this damning proof that shows the evidence actually says quite the opposite of what he is saying and actually resoundingly proves our case…How does 5 Vesparax – which the product manufacturer says is literally half a Lethal Dose – produce fatal concentrations in the liver?…This is the Rube Goldberg science Jason offers yet doesn’t account for in the credible details that firmly come in on our side…
Jason forgot to include the rest of Crompton’s quote in the same passage on page 182: ” He couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid “… Not “vomit” Jason – “fluid”…
Jason is clearly avoiding giving any honest answer to Dr Siefert saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…Very simply, reality dictates that for Siefert to detect wine covering Jimi at hospital means that same wine had to be covering Jimi at the Samarkand…It can’t be any other way because the rules of evidence Jason is contemptuously ignoring require it…Every time we mention this Jason avoids it and returns with a repeat of his false semantics trying to get around reality by purposefully misquoting the ambulance men…Jason can’t get around the FACT that, contrary to Jason’s previous lie, Dr Siefert did witness wine on Jimi and therefore corroborated Bannister’s witnessing…The wine Siefert witnessed was obviously wine that was spilled in the act of forcing it down Jimi’s throat…Jason tries to use strict court room rules of evidence to get around this – but he ignores that those same rules come in on our side because we have two medical professionals of top credibility (Dr Siefert and Dr Thurston) witnessing the wine…Jason lies when he says we need to produce material evidence of the wine…He dishonestly ignores that we have met court room standards with Siefert and Thurston’s witnessings…Jason is then forced to childishly ignore Siefert’s comment because otherwise he would be forced to admit it proves the wine…
As to Dr Brown’s comment, Jason tried to say Brown was detecting the wine in Jimi’s vomit when he said Jimi had too much to drink…But Flyswatter slapped that down by showing Jimi only had a trace blood alcohol content that meant any alcohol in the wine Jimi drank had long been digested by the time he vomited…This is why Jason is an easily-disproven idiot, because after telling us the ambulance men could not detect any wine on Jimi at the Samarkand Jason then turns around and says Dr Brown could however…Even though Jason is talking about the exact same vomit…That is a fatal contradiction that Jason avoids admitting by trolling semantics harder but never answering to the basic fatal mistake he made…In the meantime, it is obvious that the wine Dr Siefert witnessed was the same wine that Dr Brown detected and, since it turns out ALL the doctors at the hospital witnessed the wine, that means it had to be at the Samarkand too because reality doesn’t allow it not to be…
Proof that the amount of vomit was evidence of murder by drowning in wine is seen in Monika’s statement that Jimi only had a small trickle of vomit on his chin…In her official story Monika claimed that Jimi only had a trickle of vomit on his chin…However we know the truth was Jimi was covered in an unusually large amount of vomit…By lying and trying to reduce the amount of vomit Monika is showing us that she knew the large amount of vomit was indicative of Jimi being drowned in wine and vomiting as a result so she tried to reduce it for purposes of concealment…She obviously knew the large amount of vomit was incriminating…In all his trolling Jason never answers for the fact the amount of vomit on Jimi is something you never see in choking on vomit overdose cases…
Jason is contemptuously ignoring the court room rules of evidence he pretends to be upholding…I posted valid drug forensics that proved Jimi could not have vomited that way in only 1 or 2 hours after taking 9 Vesparax…This is the superior argument according to those same rules of evidence…That argument proves that since it was impossible for the Vesparax to cause the vomiting then it had to be something else…And that something else was obviously the wine Dr Bannister witnessed drowning Jimi…This is the superior argument according to the rules of evidence Jason pretends to cite…How does Jason deal with it?…He ignores it…You cannot use a deliberately-dishonest bending of the ambulance men’s statements to get around this…So Jason loses by default because his argument method violates those very same rules of evidence…Ignore valid evidence and you lose…
A great point, Buster, regarding this:
“BUSTER Says: Jason forgot to include the rest of Crompton’s quote in the same passage on page 182: ” He couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid “… Not “vomit” Jason – “fluid”…”
This corroborates with Bannister’s statement of Jimi’s lungs being overcome with fluid. It also blows the lying-denying pigbreeders (Jason and Ivana) theory of “no work was done Jimi at the hospital” all to hell, because how could Jimi’s lungs go from being full of fluid to only 400ml of free fluid being found in one of the lungs at the autopsy?
Also Jason’s stupid blather still hasn’t answered the question of “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink?”, if there was no wine as Jason decrees.
Remember Jason making the claim “the wine theory has been put to bed”? Looks very much awake & on a rampage to any sensible reader.
Jason also continues to ignore the hospital report…I’ve seen that report and it says in plain writing – Time Of Treatment: 11:45 to 12:15…So when Jason quotes Siefert saying he only pounded Jimi’s chest and then quit, the time on the hospital report disproves that and verifies Bannister’s account…So we not only have evidence of the wine but also Siefert being gotten to and covering-up…Jason is just Roadrunner cartoon road-kill in relation to this firm proof…
Quite correct , Buster…………..
We see these liars (Jason and Ivana) talking this dumb shit about about “no work” being done on Jimi at St. Mary Abbots. They have no evidence or documentation or testimony from those that were there, to back up this self-decreed, ripped out of context bullshit.
They also can’t answer the fact that if no work had been done on Jimi, then he would have been declared deceased much sooner than 12:15PM — and the hospital report proves that.
Almost forgot, Buster……….
We will see these liars talking this dumb shit of “You do not work on a dead patient for half an hour hoping for a resuscitation if that patient had all the markings of someone who had been dead for a while as the doctors noted with Jimi”
Wrong again, lying-denying assholes. Such was the case with Elvis Presley and anybody who reads this article will see they worked on Elvis for 35 minutes.
https://elvisdaily.com/2016/08/15/elvis-presleys-last-hours-august-16-1977/
Moron Flyswatter uses Elvis Presley hahaha
There was no wine witnessed at the flat.
Siefert and Brown said no “treatments” were done.
Hendrix was dead on arrival, moron.
What treatment was going to help him? Nothing
The real moron is Jason & he blatantly lies when he says “Seifert and Brown said no treatment was done”, as they never said that. Another of Jason’s lying misquotes.
Jason still hasn’t answered the question of “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink?”, if there was no wine as Jason decrees — because he can’t , which is why he hasn’t.
Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality when he says
“All the evidence refutes you. You are making up your bogus theories.”
What evidence? All Jason offers is self decreed fabrications and lying misquotes in his desperation & tries to call it “evidence”, but it isn’t & doesn’t debunk anything. Just desperate lies, because he can’t answer or debunk the hospital report proving him wrong, as well as Elvis being treated for 35 minutes, even though they knew he was dead, and proving another of Jason’s theories to be wrong.
FLYSWATTER says: The real moron is Jason & he blatantly lies when he says “Seifert and Brown said no treatment was done”, as they never said that. Another of Jason’s lying misquotes.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert.
JASON says: Flysquatter the moron, has a severe reading comprehension problem. he is unable to read what people testify to.
Dr. Siefert said: “I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.”
JASON says: If Flysquatter is too stupid not to understand what that means still wanting to believe Jimi had “all these treatments done” then he can continue to live in a land of delusion while everybody who reads this laughs at him.
Siefert said he was already dead and there was no point in doing anything else. Deal with it. Your hoax is done.
You can’t find the quote cuz there is no quote of a “hard plug of vomit”.
Your claim is that Hendrix’s throat was flooded with wine. That was debunked.
Jimi was not “covered in red wine”. Nobody at the flat testified to witnessing wine.
All the evidence refutes you. You are making up your bogus theories.
There was a reason why Jimi was handed over to the coroner for the autopsy in order to establish cause of death. If that large amount of wine was detected that morning from the ambulance officers,the police officers, and doctors then the cause of death would have been obvious to all the witnesses that morning. The coroner stated the Jimi died from chocking on his own vomit brought about by the lethal dosage of Vesparax he took no where does he state that he considered cause of death was from copious amounts of red wine. Who would truly take Buster’s word over this highly trained and experienced scientist. Dr Crompton would not have stated what he did about the fatal high concentration of barbiturate in Jimi’s liver if he had any doubts or if this was non existent. Buster has set himself up as the real expert and the only one who is able to get to the real truth of the matter where the professionals have failed. In Buster’s world the witnessing or evidence could not have been correct because he needs to prove that Jimi was murdered by waterboarding therefore he refuses to believe in the true forensics. In his suspicious mind nothing is what it seems and he has set himself up as judge and jury in this matter although it is quite clear what really caused Jimi’s death and it was not caused by waterboarding with wine by Michael Jeffrey and Monika but inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. However he plays it out you cannot doubt the true forensics which mention Jimi had a lethal dose of Vesparax in his system causing him to pass out immediately not even giving Jimi the chance to undress and get into bed. Where was the mention of the five bottles of wine extracted from Jimi as witnessed by Dr. Bannister in any report? It is illegal to withhold relevant information or is it just that this was never sighted because it simply did not exist.
Jimi was not worked on between 11.45 – 12.15. Dr Seifert was waiting for Gerry Stickells to arrive at the hospital to identify the body as there was no one about at the Samarkand to ask as the ambulance officers said. The doctors did not know who Jimi Hendrix was as there was also no one in hospital admissions to ask this tallies with no one travelling in the ambulance with them to St Mary’s hospital. This also proves that Jimi was DOA and not unconscious when brought in just like the first on the scene that morning mentioned. You do not work on a dead patient for half an hour hoping for a resuscitation if that patient had all the markings of someone who had been dead for a while as the doctors noted with Jimi. They would not have mistaken a dead patient for an unconscious one or a patient who had been murdered with copious amounts of wine from someone who died from a drug overdose. The coroner establishes cause of death through the autopsy to remove any doubt as to what caused that death. The wine did not cause Jimi’s death but the barbiturate level did as revealed with the autopsy. The forensics is what matters in this case that is why the coroner gave his verdict at the inquest along with Monika being at the Samarkand and Gerry Stickells as employee and indentifier of the body. The highly experienced team would not have and could not have mistaken a waterboarding murder for a drug overdose despite what these hoaxers want us to believe and are putting out there.
Rolling Stone Magazine from Sept. 1970 said Hendrix was pronounced dead at 11:45.
Hendrix was dead on arrival and no procedures were ever done.
Buster comes up with a brand new absurd phony claim that is worth a really good laugh and doubles down on same old debunked phony claims.
BUSTER says: Jason completely ignored the fact that Jimi lay for 6 hours on very absorbent bedding and pillows that would have have soaked-up most of the wine and left only dried vomit.
JASON says: Haha…I didn’t “ignore” it. You just made this stupid shit up before you posted, just like you do with all your new phony excuses as you try to “win a debate”. This is called trolling.
So, this is your excuse for the reason Reginal Jones and John Saua saw no wine on the bed that you claim was a “massive wine drowning”? “Super absorbent bedding and pillows”? Pathetic and a terrible job at trolling. More new phony inventions to still claim your fake wine murder caper. Hilarious!!!!!
BUSTER says: Jason ignores the fact that those ambulance men are focused on first aid and applying procedures that help the victim survive.
JASON says: Buster is ignoring the fact that Jimi Hendrix was already dead when the ambulance men came inside the flat. There was nothing they could do to “apply procedures” to help Jimi “survive”. Jimi was already dead. Both men already testified to that and so did Officer Ian Smith. That’s why Fraud Bannister’s claims of 30 minute resuscitation attempts is bullshit. Buster is very ignorant of the real evidence and legal testimony from these men trying to suggest Hendrix was “still alive” to have “procedures” done to help him “survive”. Buster has no clue about the actual events and he has enough nerve to call himself an “expert” and a “Hendrix Authority”. What a damn joke.
BUSTER says: One of the most important things Jason ignored was the fact the ambulance men stated Jimi was covered in an unusual amount of vomit.
BUSTER says: Jason refuses to answer Dr Siefert’s witnessing of Jimi being covered in red wine and what it entails.
JASON says: You’ve severely contradicted yourself, Buster. You first said that the ambulance men stated Jimi was only covered in vomit at the flat. Then you claim Jimi was only covered in wine at the hospital for Siefert. That is impossible to be covered in only vomit first and then only wine a few minutes later. Jimi is not a magic quick change artist who can magically change from vomit to wine when you want him to.
How can Jimi be covered only in vomit first at the flat and then only in red wine a few minutes later?
BUSTER says: What caused Jimi to vomit was the extraordinary amount of wine that was poured down his throat that caused his body to do one last survival surge of vomiting.
JASON says: Who poured the “extraordinary amount of wine” down Jimi’s throat?
BUSTER says: Jason is forced to ignore this because he knows it refutes his idiotic denial and proves Jimi was murdered…But all Jason is doing is ignoring irrefutable proof of homicide that he still has to answer whether he ignores it or not.
JASON says: So, who “murdered” Jimi that proves “homicide”?
How come John Saua, Reginal Jones, and Ian Smith witnessed a routine drug overdose not ever hinting at a “homicide”?
Jason mocks, self-references, and hand-waves but he doesn’t answer the point…Yes, if we took a person who was murdered by pouring wine down their throat to capacity, and that person vomited as much as Jimi did in reaction and had as much wine on him externally, yes, the bed would absorb it and dry it out to the point the wine would not be as visible…Jason accuses me of “making that up” like he stupidly does with everything – but Jason doesn’t show where exactly I made that up?…I didn’t make up anything there…A simple look at the facts will show Jimi was found on top of a bed in the position he died in…He had vomited-out on the bed and according to the ambulance men was in the position he died in…What is really happening here is Jason did his usual ridicule but it is HIM who has failed to show why this is wrong…The reality mentally ill Jason is in denial of is that we could repeat the same event and I would be proven correct…The large amount of wine-containing vomit that Jason is childishly denying would soak in to the bedding and would dry out over the 6 hour delay period for calling the ambulance…This is correct and this asshole Jason has shown nothing to show why it isn’t correct…But we are still back at the original explanation that Jason is ignoring and trying to bullshit around…The ambulance men, like anyone, simply called the expelled material “vomit” because people don’t distinguish between wine content and vomit once something is thrown up…This is also correct but mentally ill Jason is purposefully ignoring it in order to conduct his bullshit lies…If we were in a court we would appeal to the judge that this is a good argument and we would get a ruling that the vomit covered the wine…But part of the reason Jason and his partner Satan get away with this is exactly because this never went to any court where it belonged…If it had the ambulance men would be summoned and they would simply inform us that yes, Jimi was covered in wine and there was a strong indication of it…Jason is a real piece of shit because he knows this is true…So after seeing Jason’s clownish reaction to the good point about the wine soaking in to the bedding materials, and Jason’s self-reference in reaction to it, we see that despite Jason’s mocking reaction to it he never answers the point…He looks quite stupid doing that and is only mocking himself…
The next round of embarrassing bullshit Jason offers is a denial script that focuses on Jimi being dead…Because Jason is mentally ill his lies are now taking over the entire scene at the Samarkand…He is using this irrelevant diversion to avoid answering the fact that the ambulance men were not refereeing at the time how much wine was in the vomit, they were trying to save the victim…So it is not honest to infer they would judge there being too much wine and it being suspicious at the time…They were simply too busy to do that and were trying to save the victim…Jason goes in to a lecture on Jimi being dead but after he’s done he never answers the point…The ambulance men were focused on doing their duty to save the victim…They were not standing back and evaluating the scene for signs of wine murder like Jason falsely contends and then badly fails to answer when asked to walk it back and explain it…Jason is pretty dumb – because if Jimi was dead like he says (and he was) then that backs the ambulance men spending little time on Jimi and not being able to penetrate the hard plug of vomit they made clear was in Jimi’s throat from their descriptions…
Next Jason uses one of his devil’s lies to say I said Jimi was only covered in vomit at the Samarkand…Jason is lying and using deliberately deceptive semantic tricks to make a false argument…Anyone who reads my posts will see I made it more than clear that Jimi was murdered by having wine poured down his throat until he drowned…Some of that wine spilled over while being forced down Jimi’s throat and that was what was soaking Jimi’s hair and clothing…Jimi vomited in response like drowning victims do and when the vomiting stomach muscles took over they locked the wine in to the lungs…(Jason moronically gave no answer to this physiological description)…As the ambulance men described in clear detail, their suctioning equipment was inadequate to penetrate the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat so they never exposed the wine that was right behind it…Jason knows this but he keeps dementedly saying that the ambulance men never saw any wine flooding Jimi’s lungs and stomach…He knows they had no opportunity to see it because they never got through the plug of vomit, but because Jason is mentally ill that doesn’t stop him from saying it anyway…Reality or fact do not get in the way of mentally ill Jason…As soon as Siefert’s more capable hospital suctioner cleared that plug of vomit it exposed the 5 bottles of wine that were behind it that Bannister described…Jason is a nut because he posts in public that unless the ambulance men said verbatim “Jimi had a hard plug of vomit in his throat” that therefore he didn’t…But Jason has already seen the ambulance men describe that plug of vomit in their accounts where they said they failed to get through it…Jason is going to try to steer the debate in to unending discussion of the exact anally-perfect meaning of what the ambulance men described, but anyone can see he is doing that as a trolling tactic to avoid admitting what they made more than obviously clear…Despite Jason’s sick attempts at denying it, Dr Siefert then witnessed the wine that was covering Jimi at St Mary’s…Jason is lying…I never contradicted myself and I never said only vomit was on Jimi at the Samarkand…So, once again, after offering a long load of bullshit and lies Jason has failed to answer the point and walks away not having made any credible response…
Any credible, serious person will see Jason yielded my evidence in his last entry where he asks who did it?…By asking who did it, Jason is showing on a psychological level, that he has seen good evidence that makes him ask…Only a mentally ill person would do that in the same space he offers his demented denial and not notice…
Jason is a liar and routine overdoses do not involve a massive amount of wine-containing vomit…I have made a skilled argument that the amount of vomit is incriminating and not normal in choking on vomit overdose deaths…I even showed Monika being aware of this by lying and trying to reduce it to a trickle…Jason gives no intelligent answer to this and just stupidly repeats his lie that the ambulance men saw an ordinary overdose…But this is proven not to be so by the evidence I discussed that Jason didn’t answer…
And get a load of this, Buster………..
First we have this…………………..
“JASON says:
October 22, 2019 at 12:18 am…
“We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead.”- Dr. Martin Siefert”
Then next we have…
“JASON says:
October 22, 2019 at 12:32 am..
Siefert and Brown said no “treatments” were done.”
Hey Jason, you can’t have it both ways, STUPID. Seifert is saying in his quote that they DID work on Jimi. He’s not saying no treatments were done.
And Buster, you gotta love this……………
Both of these stupid, lying-denying pigbreeders (Jason and Ivana), who asshole-to-asshole couldn’t make a beer fart in a whirlwind — let alone provide credible input to this thread — keep up with their endless stupidity by asking “I also want to know who exactly forced wine down Jimi’s throat”
Are these two retards really stupid enough to think, that after 49 years and with no proper investigation into Jimi’s death ever being done in the first place, that the names of any perpetrators that were involved (other than Monika and Jeffery being the prime suspects involved) are just going to magically appear at their request?
These two retards asking this stupid question can go to the same source that they’re getting their self-decreed fabrications from, to get their answers — they can just dig into their own ass.
Buster has a nutty commentary going on but he argues the same debunked garbage over and over. The dude has some serious issues. Most of what he has written is long winded nonsense but I will refute a few of his ridiculous rantings.
BUSTER says: If we took a person who was murdered by pouring wine down their throat to capacity, and that person vomited as much as Jimi did in reaction and had as much wine on him externally, yes, the bed would absorb it and dry it out to the point the wine would not be as visible.
JASON says: Red wine stains everything, moron. All that “pure wine” you claim was soaked on the bed would be visible to anybody..
Nobody was “murdered” by pouring wine down their throat to full capacity. The death scene was testified as a drug overdose. Reginal Jones said Jimi choked on vomit. So, you lose.
No wine was ever witnessed at the flat on Jimi Hendrix or on the bed by ambulance or police men or the coroner’s officers who took blankets for forensic analysis. Now how do you answer that?
BUSTER says: The large amount of wine-containing vomit that Jason is childishly denying would soak in to the bedding and would dry out over the 6 hour delay period for calling the ambulance…This is correct and this asshole Jason has shown nothing to show why it isn’t correct…
JASON says: It’s correct cuz you say it’s correct? You have issues. You are also a liar cuz you stated that “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed. Forget your lies?
BUSTER says: The murder scene had spilled pure wine on the bed this wine is criminal forensic evidence of wine spilled during the act of waterboarding murder .
JASON says: You are describing a brutal scene here that the ambulance men would have witnessed and graphically described it if this actually happened. There would be no way they would leave this out of their testimony.
You made this garbage up and now you got caught red handed cuz you can’t answer for the fact that the ambulance men witnessed no wine or this brutal scene you claimed. Now, you are heavily backtracking trying to pathetically claim vomit means “wine” and “super absorbent bedding” would soak up all the wine. Red wine would stil be visible and they said nothing about it. Hell, you won’t even say who the “murderer” is you claim killed Hendrix. You are a fraud and lost your phony hoax.
The vomit did not contain large amounts of wine. No wine was ever witnessed and forensic analysis of the blankets showed no wine. Wine was never a factor in 1970. The phony wine claims didn’t start until after this testimony. They weren’t even looking for wine in 1970. The forensic analysis was done to determine which type of drugs that Hendrix took.
BUSTER says: we are still back at the original explanation that Jason is ignoring and trying to bullshit around…The ambulance men, like anyone, simply called the expelled material “vomit” because people don’t distinguish between wine content and vomit once something is thrown up…
JASON says: You lied saying “pure wine was spilled all over the bed”. They would have easily seen it if it was there. All your lies are coming back to haunt you early before Halloween.
BUSTER says: If it had the ambulance men would be summoned and they would simply inform us that yes, Jimi was covered in wine and there was a strong indication of it…Jason is a real piece of shit because he knows this is true…So after seeing Jason’s clownish reaction to the good point about the wine soaking in to the bedding materials, and Jason’s self-reference in reaction to it, we see that despite Jason’s mocking reaction to it he never answers the point…He looks quite stupid doing that and is only mocking himself.
JASON says: The only one looking stupid here is you and we are laughing at you.
The ambulance men already gave this testimony, moron. If they saw all kinds of wine they already would have stated that they did in their testimony. They never even said the word since there was no wine and they were describing a routine drug overdose. You are delusional.
BUSTER says: next round of embarrassing bullshit Jason offers is a denial script that focuses on Jimi being dead…Because Jason is mentally ill his lies are now taking over the entire scene at the Samarkand…He is using this irrelevant diversion to avoid answering the fact that the ambulance men were not refereeing at the time how much wine was in the vomit, they were trying to save the victim…So it is not honest to infer they would judge there being too much wine and it being suspicious at the time…They were simply too busy to do that and were trying to save the victim…Jason goes in to a lecture on Jimi being dead but after he’s done he never answers the point…The ambulance men were focused on doing their duty to save the victim…They were not standing back and evaluating the scene for signs of wine murder like Jason falsely contends and then badly fails to answer when asked to walk it back and explain it…Jason is pretty dumb – because if Jimi was dead like he says (and he was) then that backs the ambulance men spending little time on Jimi and not being able to penetrate the hard plug of vomit they made clear was in Jimi’s throat from their descriptions…
JASON says: You need serious help. Jimi was already dead. Nobody could save or help him. Everybody has said that even Fraud Bannister said he was dead for hours.
The ambulance men described the vomit perfectly and saw no wine. Officer Ian Smith was called to the flat and saw no wine either or a “murder scene” which is why he let them take the body away. There was no “hard plug of vomit”. Nobody ever said this. This is a fake story you are using since the ambulance men found no wine.
BUSTER says: Next the ambulance men described in clear detail, their suctioning equipment was inadequate to penetrate the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat so they never exposed the wine that was right behind it…Jason knows this but he keeps dementedly saying that the ambulance men never saw any wine flooding Jimi’s lungs and stomach…
JASON says: John Saua and Reginal Jones never gave any testimony stating this. More bogus lies.
BUSTER says: As soon as Siefert’s more capable hospital suctioner cleared that plug of vomit it exposed the 5 bottles of wine that were behind it that Bannister described…
JASON says: This is total made up bullshit. Siefert never suctioned Jimi. He pounded his heart twice and he was done.
Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead..I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead. -Dr. Martin Siefert
Siefert refutes your bullshit. He says he never worked on Hendrix doing a “procedure”.
BUSTER says: Any credible, serious person will see Jason yielded my evidence in his last entry where he asks who did it?…By asking who did it, Jason is showing on a psychological level, that he has seen good evidence that makes him ask…Only a mentally ill person would do that in the same space he offers his demented denial and not notice…
JASON says: No, your evidence is crap, but it’s about time you start answering for your phony claims. You keep claiming “Jimi was murdered” with phony claims, so you need to answer for what you are claiming.
Buster, who “murdered” Jimi Hendrix as you claim?
You can’t run away and hide from your claims like chicken little.
BUSTER says: Jason is a liar and routine overdoses do not involve a massive amount of wine-containing vomit…I have made a skilled argument that the amount of vomit is incriminating and not normal in choking on vomit overdose deaths…I even showed Monika being aware of this by lying and trying to reduce it to a trickle…Jason gives no intelligent answer to this and just stupidly repeats his lie that the ambulance men saw an ordinary overdose…But this is proven not to be so by the evidence I discussed that Jason can’t answer it.
JASON says: You have made up crap and nonsense for your hoax and got caught red handed for having no answer for why the Ambulance men saw no wine at the flat. There was no massive amount of wine containing vomit cuz no wine was witnessed and the forensic analysis of the vomit showed only drugs were involved. All you do is nonsensically rant like a loon about the same debunked claims over and over with a mish mash of weird plots and scenarios that made no sense since they are all after the fact claims. Your goose has been cooked. You have no wine and you can’t even say who your “murderer” is.
FLYSWATTER says: Are these two retards really stupid enough to think, that after 49 years and with no proper investigation into Jimi’s death ever being done in the first place, that the names of any perpetrators that were involved (other than Monika and Jeffery being the prime suspects involved) are just going to magically appear at their request?
JASON says: What you are saying is, that you don’t know a damn thing you are talking about and you two clowns just blow smoke up each other’s ass.
Thanks for the confirmation!
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, says:
“What you are saying is, that you don’t know a damn thing you are talking about and you two clowns just blow smoke up each other’s ass.
Thanks for the confirmation!”
Keep dreaming, shitball. We know plenty about this case, even if the perpetrators are unknown in name. The only clowns blowing the smoke up each others ass are Jason and his twin piglet, Sister Ivana Sow.
And of course, the only confirmation that we really have here is these two lying-denying pigbreeders (Jason and Ivana) just like to keep wallowing in their own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
Flysquatter knows nothing since he has no evidence he can produce to confirm his phony claims
Another wine hoaxing clown who folds like a cheap deck of cards when confronted with producing real evidence he doesn’t have..
Just more trolling from Buster the clown who changes his phony “wine drowning” claims when it suits him. He claims one thing and then changes it again. He does this cuz he has nothing to prove for his fake wine hoax.
BUSTER says: September 7, 2019
Yes, Jimi died a quick death – only the means was forced drowning in wine as all the evidence Ivana is idiotically in contempt of shows.
BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
BUSTER says: October 21, 2019
The wine Siefert witnessed was obviously wine that was spilled in the act of forcing it down Jimi’s throat.
JASON says: Buster the clown continues to troll as he changes his phony “wine drowning” claims with ease. Buster claims Jimi was “forced drowned”. Then he says “No one would need to force wine into Jimi”. Now he’s back to Jimi being “forced drowned” again.
Buster is a troll who changes his phony claims on purpose so he can say he won a “debate”. He will make one claim, and when he is refuted, he will change it again to something else, then he will go back to his original claim. That is called trolling. He is not being serious and he has no solid case when he makes up fake claims only to change them again. He does this with his fake “hard plug of vomit” after he claimed a “throat full of liquid wine”. He does this with everything. That’s why nobody can take him seriously. He has no real evidence for his phony claims. He just makes stuff up and switches phony claims each time he thinks he can win a “debate” Pathetic!
So, Buster is claiming again that “someone” forced wine down Jimi’s throat.
Buster, who “forced wine” down Jimi’s throat?
You can’t keep hiding from your phony “wine drowning” claims by not answering it.
Hi Jason I also want to know who exactly forced wine down Jimi’s throat since hoaxers rely on Wright’s bogus story for their claims. We all know the supposed murderer Michael Jeffrey was in Spain. Buster keeps avoiding the question instead giving his long winded account of what he thinks happened to Jimi. Buster is not presenting evidence here but opinion and speculation disguised as fact.
Hi Ivana,
Bluster the clown is scared to answer a simple question. He likes to claim Jimi was “murdered” all the time but still won’t name his “killer”. We can’t take a person seriously who refuses to answer the main point of his claim.
Should we ask Bluster again?
C’mon Bluster you can do it!
Should your spokesman “Flysquatter” answer for you?
Shameful the self proclaimed “foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix” can’t answer the main point of his claim.
Who “murdered” Jimi Hendrix?
Jason is obviously mentally ill…Only a mentally ill person would think he was getting away with that idiotic semantic contrivance of focusing on the meaning of forced drowning…If you read Jason’s last reply it offers nothing towards the substantial arguments of evidence I made in my previous posts…Jason is ignoring that normal drug overdose choking on vomit cases do not have so much vomit…The excessive amount of vomit was due to Jimi being drowned in wine and not from any drug overdose that usually doesn’t have that much vomit…Jason can’t answer this so he enters idiotic semantic bullshit instead of answering what is actually being argued…Jason isn’t too bright because he says I changed my story but then he dementedly shows quotes from me where there is nothing to indicate I ever changed my story…
You are avoiding answering the question directly again Buster. Who killed Jimi Hendrix? Jason and I are well versed in what killed Jimi we certainly don’t need your “evidence” I mean speculation to know the truth as we have the coroner’s report for this which says it all. You have deliberately refused to accept the official findings for reasons known only to you. You have challenged the cause of death from barbiturate intoxication to forced drowning and present only the evidence which suits your claims if any. I would never believe anyone who places their trust with the likes of Dr.Bannister, Tappy Wright and Albert Allen which you have repeatedly done. And congratulations in having such an eloquent and articulate sidekick as Flyswatter or should that be Flysquatter.
The only mentally ill person here is you who claims a Jimi Hendrix “murder” and “homcide” and refuses to answer a simple question.
You change your phony story all the time. You claim a “forced drowning” then you
claim a “non forced wine drowning”. All your quotes are here in the public domain. Quit lying.
Who “murdered” Jimi Hendrix?
You can’t claim Hendrix was “murdered” if you don’t answer it.
That’s not working Jason…The way credible debate works is my showing the .7mg barbiturate level means that science has proven Jimi had enough barbiturate in him that he would give no resistance to any wine that was forced down his throat…You’ve already had this explained to you…The way credible debate works is once I’ve shown evidence that Jimi would give no resistance then that stands as given and doesn’t have to be argued anymore…So therefore an obnoxious, trollish diversion in to discussing whether or not I can say wine was forced down Jimi’s throat is silly and is a violation of the rules of evidence once again on your behalf…I’ve proven my point with the barbiturate level…Anybody can see you are avoiding admitting that by trying to divert the discussion in to idiotic semantic trolling…Jimi could be incapacitated and unable to resist and still have wine forced down his throat…
If you were to try this in a court room with a judge you would be arrested by the bailiff for contempt and the judge would move for your disbarment…This is a good example of your demented intent in this thread…
Buster the clown is still dizzy from spinning all his lies. He pathetically continues on his trolling journey of changing his fake stories.
BUSTER says: That’s not working Jason…The way credible debate works is my showing the .7mg barbiturate level means that science has proven Jimi had enough barbiturate in him that he would give no resistance to any wine that was forced down his throat…You’ve already had this explained to you…The way credible debate works is once I’ve shown evidence that Jimi would give no resistance then that stands as given and doesn’t have to be argued anymore…So therefore an obnoxious, trollish diversion in to discussing whether or not I can say wine was forced down Jimi’s throat is silly and is a violation of the rules of evidence once again on your behalf…I’ve proven my point with the barbiturate level…Anybody can see you are avoiding admitting that by trying to divert the discussion in to idiotic semantic trolling…Jimi could be incapacitated and unable to resist and still have wine forced down his throat…
JASON says: It’s not working for you who repeatedly lies changing your phony stories. With your own fake made up claim, you are calling Tappy Wright a liar who said Jimi had pills stuffed in his mouth. Tappy never said Jimi was incapacitated with pills first. So, you are making up your own brand new hoax. You can’t do that since there is only one official story by Tappy Wright. You don’t get to make up your own fake stories.
You are a lying hoaxer who changes your stories whenever it suits you. It’s been already told to you that your claims are bogus and contradictory. You haven’t proven any point since you continually lie. You have already refuted this bogus claim of yours already before. Did you forget about this beauty you told?
BUSTER says: the pills being shoved down Jimi’s throat by the murderers.
JASON says: Here you are saying Jimi had pills shoved down his throat, so yes, he would give resistance to pills being shoved down his throat since he had no barbiturates in him. We have all your lies here in public domain to show how you lie, troll, and change your phony claims. You can’t run away from all the lies and fake stories you made up.
BUSTER says: the pills being shoved down Jimi’s throat by the murderers.
BUSTER says: Jimi had enough barbiturate in him that he would give no resistance to any wine that was forced down his throat…
BUSTER says: Jimi could be incapacitated and unable to resist and still have wine forced down his throat…
JASON says: More pathetic lying and changing your phony stories again. You first claimed Jimi had pills “shoved down his throat by murderers”. Today you are lying claiming Jimi “was incapacitated with pills first”. You are a troll who lies and changes your phony claims. Your new fake version is not the official version by Tappy Wright, so your fake version is automatically debunked. You are not allowed to make up your own fake versions.
BUSTER says: If you were to try this in a court room with a judge you would be arrested by the bailiff for contempt and the judge would move for your disbarment…This is a good example of your demented intent in this thread…
JASON says: Actually, you would be for making up fake murder claims in court with phony charges. You are a demented troll for making up phony murder claims that do not exist.
By the way chicken little, are you ever going to tell us who “murdered” Jimi Hendrix? You can’t keep being be a coward running away from your phony claims.
You’re a sick motherfucker Jason…The more I nail you the more you offer demented trolling…You know I never said Jimi had the pills shoved down his throat…You’re quoting me saying that because you are a sick person who, when nailed over his lies, returns by taunting me with even worse demented lies…You can’t quote me saying Jimi had the pills shoved down his throat because you know I never said that…All you are doing Jason is showing the public how you spin spider webs of false contrivances and then try to get people to answer them…When nailed on it you offer more kiddie trolling…But you still haven’t answered the point that Jimi’s .7mg blood barbiturate level proves he was unable to resist the wine that was poured down his throat…
You’re a mentally ill liar Jason and you won’t be able to cite me saying Jimi had the pills shoved down his throat…The only reason you are trolling that lie is because like the sick scum you are you are using it to publicly dodge answering the .7mg barbiturate level, that shows Jimi had an amount of barbiturate in him that would make him offer no resistance to having wine poured down his throat…
BUSTER says: You’re a sick motherfucker Jason…The more I nail you the more you offer demented trolling…You know I never said Jimi had the pills shoved down his throat…You’re quoting me saying that because you are a sick person who, when nailed over his lies, returns by taunting me with even worse demented lies…You can’t quote me saying Jimi had the pills shoved down his throat because you know I never said that…All you are doing Jason is showing the public how you spin spider webs of false contrivances and then try to get people to answer them…When nailed on it you offer more kiddie trolling…But you still haven’t answered the point that Jimi’s .7mg blood barbiturate level proves he was unable to resist the wine that was poured down his throat…
JASON says: You’ve nailed yourself drowning in your own lies and now you don’t know what to do. Running around like chicken little.
You change your stories when it suits your phony claim. We have all your lies here in public domain to present you with. You can no longer run and hide from them.
You are making up your own version of a fake story that doesn’t exist. Tappy Wright’s official story is that Hendrix had “pills stuffed in his mouth” that is the only story you can use. You don’t get to make up your own fake versions. Your fake versions do not exist.
BUSTER says: You’re a mentally ill liar Jason and you won’t be able to cite me saying Jimi had the pills shoved down his throat…The only reason you are trolling that lie is because like the sick scum you are you are using it to publicly dodge answering the .7mg barbiturate level, that shows Jimi had an amount of barbiturate in him that would make him offer no resistance to having wine poured down his throat…
JASON says: I’ve already cited you and all your other lies.
Jimi was not “incapacitated with pills first” that is your own fake version that doesn’t exist.
The only version is Tappy Wright’s version where he claimed “Jimi had pills stuffed into his mouth”
That is the only version you can use. Your own fake version doesn’t exist..
More spinning and fairy tale fantasy from Buster as he proceeds in his quest to locate the imaginary wine at the Samarkand, in his failed attempt at proving his phony “wine drowning”. Let’s see if he is successful at accomplishing his feat. Just don’t make any bets on it.
BUSTER says: Jason achieves this by creating a parallel argument that the emergency personnel at the Samarkand never mentioned wine specifically…This is a bad ripping of context by Jason that is being deliberately done.
JASON says: Buster engages in a heavy dose of projection as he is the one doing “the bad ripping of context” adding his own phony words to the ambulance men’s testimony saying brown vomit means “red wine”, pool means “red wine”, and dry vomit means a “hard plug”. Only a lying troll would display this type of behavior or someone that is in serious need of psychiatric help seeing things that doesn’t exist from reading a testimony.
Buster creates the fake parallel argument of a fake “hard plug of vomit” that was never witnessed or testified to by John Saua or Reginal Jones. He also tries to still claim “wine” when it was never witnessed by either man.
Both men graphically describe only vomit and the effects of a drug overdose. If there was this fake “wine drowning” as Buster claims, then both men would have graphically described it. Buster knows it’s a lost cause for himself which is why his only option is to engage in word play games and making up bogus stories.
BUSTER says: It is clear from their statements that they failed due to a hard plug of vomit their equipment could not penetrate
JASON says: Show me a clear quote where Reginal Jones or John Saua said they witnessed a “hard plug of vomit”?
This is Buster the clown’s parallel argument of his fake “hard plug of vomit” that doesn’t exist. Both men only said the vomit was dry. They never said anything about a “hard plug”. Remember, Buster’s first claim was Hendrix’s “throat was flooded with wine spilling out of his mouth” and now he changes it to a “hard plug of vomit”. He has debunked his own phony claim since a wet throat full of wine can never be dry. This is what a troll does always changing claims on purpose while not being serious.
BUSTER says: Jason is claiming Jimi died of a barbiturate overdose and choked on his vomit…However Jason is ignoring the provable forensic evidence that shows that is impossible.
JASON says: Reginal Jones, John Saua, Ian Smith, Dr. Bob Brown, Dr. Teare, Dr. Thurston all agree and confirm that Jimi Hendrix died from a barbiturate overdose and choked on his own vomit. The forensic analysis proved it and so did the testimony from Reginal Jones and John Saua. Bob Brown and Thurston confirmed it. Jones and Saua witnessed dry vomit that caused Hendrix to suffocate. The dry vomit still remained in his throat which was the evidence of the suffocation not allowing Hendrix to breathe. Their testimony proves it. That makes it 1000% official. That makes your phony wine hoax totally 1000% impossible.
According to your bogus “wine drowning theory”, Hendrix would be flooded with wine from his mouth down to his stomach in an “overkill”. He could never have a dry throat with dry vomit as was witnessed from his drug overdose. He would be flooded with a wet throat with wine. So, your fake theory has been easily refuted since the testimony of Reginal Jones and John Saua describe a classic case of a drug overdose and not an invented phony “wine drowning”. No wine was witnessed and no wine flooded in Jimi’s throat easily debunks your bogus and fraudulent hoax.
Hell, even Reginal Jones confirmed it to Kathy Etchingham that Hendrix choked on his vomit.
“Sit him up! No luv, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked.” – Reginal Jones
Read, Buster, read….read carefully above….Reginal Jones specifically and clearly said Hendrix choked on vomit. Do you see that? Read it again and again and again.
“Sit him up! No luv, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked.” – Reginal Jones
Reginal Jones was describing a routine drug overdose to Kathy Etchingham about Hendrix choking on vomit. This man witnessed many drug overdoses and knew what it entailed. Never ever did he say Hendrix was “drowned”. That is a completely different thing.
Buster the clown is refuted once again and word play games and new made up fake claims isn’t going to help him. You lost your hoax. Get over it. Jones said he choked and I am right. This testimony falls right in line with the final verdict of Dr Thurston since these men described the dry vomit that suffocated Hendrix. Sorry, you lose.
BUSTER says: This must be the case because we have proven forensically that it could not be the result of the barbiturate.
JASON says: You’ve proven nothing except to spout off your ridiculous phony theories that all contradict each other. This is not the case, since you make up new phony excuses every chance you get. Real forensic analysis done by top professionals determined it to be a barbiturate overdose. So did the testimony from Reginal Jones, John Saua, Bob Brown, and Ian Smith. All these men confirm the same outcome and verdict. It perfectly dovetails as you say. Your bogus forensics is a mish mash of nonsense that you made up to fit your phony narrative. Nobody can take it seriously.
BUSTER says: Jason is forced to ignore this because he knows it refutes his idiotic denial and proves Jimi was murdered…But all Jason is doing is ignoring irrefutable proof of homicide that he still has to answer whether he ignores it or not.
JASON says: Buster the clown still claims his phony “murder” and “homicide” but still never tells us who “murdered” Jimi Hendrix. He runs away as fast as he can from that refusing to answer. This clearly shows he is just perpetrating a hoax since he can’t answer the major point of his “case”. Who “murdered” Jimi? Can you answer it Buster?
It’s also very hard for Buster to claim a “murder” and “irrefutable proof of homicide” when his main weapon “bottles of wine” spilled all over the bed was never witnessed by authorities who combed the flat or by medical technicians who tended to Hendrix. All 3 men who testified never once hinted at foul play or what Buster the clown is claiming. They all regarded it as a routine drug overdose and whine hoaxers can’t argue against thst irrefutable evidence that is fully cemented.
I’ve refuted Buster’s nonsense constantly and he has no proof of anything. All he does is parrot quotes from Sharon Lawrence and makes up crazy theories in his warped mind.
BUSTER says: Jason will not be able to find any other Vesparax overdose case where the victim vomited-out so profusely in only 1 or 2 hours after taking 9 tablets…The fact he can’t answer it is why it is proof.
JASON says: Of course I will answer it. Funny how you always only mention the Vesparax but never point to the main culprit that killed Hendrix. I think you do this purposely to push your wine hoax or maybe you really are that ignorant and unaware of the real facts not being the “World’s Greatest Hendrix Expert”.
Jimi mixed a powerful amphetamine called a “black bomber” with the 9 Vesparax that caused an adverse reaction. His body was rejecting powerful uppers and downers which is why he was profusely vomiting. But you always leave out the fact he mixed a strong upper with the 9 Vesparax so you can claim your imaginary wine hoax. Hendrix died from mixing too many powerful pills together. That is the simple fact and the tragic result that killed him. Most overdoses occur within the two hour mark so Hendrix was right on time so to speak. The “black bomber” is what sped up the process and resulted in the profuse vomiting. Uppers and downers together with the wine he drank before at Harvey’s and Kameron’s was a deadly concoction.
Next time don’t leave out the “black bomber” so you can’t claim Vesparax won’t cause a death or profuse vomiting after 2 hours. Nice try again, but as usual, you lose. We have defeated you again. Try harder next time. How about just being honest instead of making junk up for your fake theory? Well, you can’t do that, otherwise you would have no fake hoax. Sorry, my bad.
It is hopeless to respond to a demented troll who ignores your proof and keeps repeating the same uncredible bullshit…If Jason’s claim that the Black Bomber was the straw that broke the camel’s back and caused a lethal toxicity were true then the autopsy and Inquest would have claimed it…Jason is trying to use name-calling and trash talk to overcome the rules of evidence that he is clearly in violation of…If anything, the amphetamine in the Black Bomber would have offset some of the negative effect of the barbiturate…
Jason ignores that I have proven by means of the main pharmacological sources that Jimi could not have died from the Vesparax…I cited the Underwriter’s Laboratories case study of Vesparax overdoses and proved that persons who took from 1 to 6 more pills than Jimi never died in less than 4 hours…I proved that Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 or 2 hours max and that wasn’t enough time to cause the unusual vomiting seen at the death scene…Jimi’s tolerance saved him from dying from only 9 Vesparax when the manufacturer’s product information listed Lethal Dose as “9 to 10 tablets”…And pharma-forensic science absolutely prohibits a person with such a famous tolerance from profusely vomiting and dying only 1 to 2 hours after taking 9 tablets…If you read Jason’s responses to my forensic argument he is obviously a dumb-ass and doesn’t understand it…Please, anyone, go read his trash-talk, trollish replies to my forensic arguments and see he is literally unable to offer a single intelligent word in response…The reason for that is they are good at a court room level and this demented troll Jason is unable to answer them…Jason is a moron and he doesn’t understand that 1 amphetamine would only tilt the balance in favor of Jimi not overdosing from the barbiturate…
Jason attempts a type of trolling that tries to infer expertise by means of extensive reference…It is a trolling ploy where he uses language to suggest he is in control of the evidence and it must be discussed according to his terms…Jason uses a series of false claims and misrepresentation of context to deny the hard plug of vomit the ambulance men witnessed in Jimi’s throat…But it is easily proven by simply referencing the valid evidence that Jason is trying to bury in his long offerings of bullshit…It is very simple…The ambulance men made clear that there was hard dry vomit in Jimi’s throat that their equipment could not clear…Jason is violating the evidence in his deliberately inaccurate responses…He lied and said there had to be wine visible in Jimi’s throat if Jimi was drowned in wine – but he forgets that his own quotes from the ambulance men say there was dry vomit in Jimi’s throat that they could not penetrate with their suctioner…Jason is lying when he says that if Jimi was drowned in wine there had to be visible wine in his mouth and throat that would have been witnessed by the ambulance men…That claim is idiotic…There is no reason what so ever why the wine could not be blocked-in behind the vomit…I have already given a medical/physiological explanation for why there was a plug of vomit corking-in the wine…As usual Jason ignores it and gives one of his classic trollish, buffoon-type responses like this one…But this is all a good example of Jason trying to dishonestly control the evidence…The simple answer is the ambulance men witnessed the hard plug of vomit that they clearly, adequately described and said they couldn’t get through…Dr Bannister then described the wine in the mouth and throat after Dr Siefert removed the hard plug of vomit…Jason tries the trolling trick of revising the evidence according to his deceptive intent and then asking people to answer it – but as I show here it is much more credible and accurate to simply answer the original unaltered evidence as it was originally told…It not only shows you what happened but also makes clear how this lying piece of shit Jason is trying to get around it…
More of the same hot air long winded nutty commentary from Bluster who is good at making false claims but can never provide one ounce of evidence for what he says. This is how we all know Bluster is trolling with fake wine and “murder” claims.
When confronted with having to produce real evidence for his phony claims Bluster folds like a cheap deck of cards.
BUSTER says: AIt is hopeless to respond to a demented troll who ignores your proof and keeps repeating the same uncredible bullshit…If Jason’s claim that the Black Bomber was the straw that broke the camel’s back and caused a lethal toxicity were true then the autopsy and Inquest would have claimed it…Jason is trying to use name-calling and trash talk to overcome the rules of evidence that he is clearly in violation of…If anything, the amphetamine in the Black Bomber would have offset some of the negative effect of the barbiturate…
JASON says: You are a troll who has no idea what you are talking about. Mixing uppers and downers causes a severe reaction. The autopsy proved Hendrix died of a barbiturate overdose. The forensics proved it and it was conformed by several men
BUSTER says: Jason ignores that I have proven by means of the main pharmacological sources that Jimi could not have died from the Vesparax…I cited the Underwriter’s Laboratories case study of Vesparax overdoses and proved that persons who took from 1 to 6 more pills than Jimi never died in less than 4 hours…I proved that Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 or 2 hours max and that wasn’t enough time to cause the unusual vomiting seen at the death scene…Jimi’s tolerance saved him from dying from only 9 Vesparax when the manufacturer’s product information listed Lethal Dose as “9 to 10 tablets”…And pharma-forensic science absolutely prohibits a person with such a famous tolerance from profusely vomiting and dying only 1 to 2 hours after taking 9 tablets…If you read Jason’s responses to my forensic argument he is obviously a dumb-ass and doesn’t understand it…Please, anyone, go read his trash-talk, trollish replies to my forensic arguments and see he is literally unable to offer a single intelligent word in response…The reason for that is they are good at a court room level and this demented troll Jason is unable to answer them…Jason is a moron and he doesn’t understand that 1 amphetamine would only tilt the balance in favor of Jimi not overdosing from the barbiturate…
JASON says: You haven’t proved anything except the nonsense you make up in your crazy head. Mixing a “black bomber” and 9 Vesparax is a deadly mix for anybody. But you continue to troll claiming your bogus “murder wine claim” instead that you have no evidence of and won’t even name your “killer”.
BUSTER says: Jason attempts a type of trolling that tries to infer expertise by means of extensive reference…It is a trolling ploy where he uses language to suggest he is in control of the evidence and it must be discussed according to his terms…Jason uses a series of false claims and misrepresentation of context to deny the hard plug of vomit the ambulance men witnessed in Jimi’s throat…But it is easily proven by simply referencing the valid evidence that Jason is trying to bury in his long offerings of bullshit…It is very simple…The ambulance men made clear that there was hard dry vomit in Jimi’s throat that their equipment could not clear…Jason is violating the evidence in his deliberately inaccurate responses…He lied and said there had to be wine visible in Jimi’s throat if Jimi was drowned in wine – but he forgets that his own quotes from the ambulance men say there was dry vomit in Jimi’s throat that they could not penetrate with their suctioner…Jason is lying when he says that if Jimi was drowned in wine there had to be visible wine in his mouth and throat that would have been witnessed by the ambulance men…That claim is idiotic…There is no reason what so ever why the wine could not be blocked-in behind the vomit…I have already given a medical/physiological explanation for why there was a plug of vomit corking-in the wine…As usual Jason ignores it and gives one of his classic trollish, buffoon-type responses like this one…But this is all a good example of Jason trying to dishonestly control the evidence…The simple answer is the ambulance men witnessed the hard plug of vomit that they clearly, adequately described and said they couldn’t get through…Dr Bannister then described the wine in the mouth and throat after Dr Siefert removed the hard plug of vomit…Jason tries the trolling trick of revising the evidence according to his deceptive intent and then asking people to answer it – but as I show here it is much more credible and accurate to simply answer the original unaltered evidence as it was originally told…It not only shows you what happened but also makes clear how this lying piece of shit Jason is trying to get around it…
JASON says: Same old trolling and same fake debunked claims over and over. There was no “hard plug of vomit” and this troll uses that lie so he can still claim his fake non existent wine. Not one man ever testified to what this troll is claiming.
If your so called evidence was legit you could answer your claims idiot. You can’t answer you clams cuz you are perpetrating a hoax and have no evidence. So, you get really angry attacking me and you double down on your fake claims. You are a nut.
Dr. Siefert never removed anything from Jimi Hendrix. This troll keeps lying about fake stories in his crazy head.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Dr. Siefert refutes this lying troll in his testimony. Siefert said Jimi was dead and there was no point in doing anything else. There are no “hard plugs of vomit” and no wine. But this wine troll keeps telling the same bogus stories over and over.
When this troll is confronted with having to produce real evidence for his phony claims he starts backpedaling and attacking you. He has no evidence of any of his claims and he never will. His hoax is over.
BUSTER says: October 22, 2019
Jason isn’t too bright because he says I changed my story but then he dementedly shows quotes from me where there is nothing to indicate I ever changed my story…
JASON says: Buster is either delusional in need of serious mental help or just a pathological liar. He saying he doesn’t change his stories. Buster’s m.o. is to constantly change his fake stories. Lucky for Buster, we have all his quotes where he changes his stories. Maybe this will refresh his fuzzy memory again.
BUSTER says: September 7, 2019
Yes, Jimi died a quick death – only the means was forced drowning in wine as all the evidence Ivana is idiotically in contempt of shows.
BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
BUSTER says: October 21, 2019
The wine Siefert witnessed was obviously wine that was spilled in the act of forcing it down Jimi’s throat.
JASON says: Buster changes his stories when it suits him.
Quote #1 Buster claims a Hendrix “forced wine drowning”
Quote #2 Buster changes his story saying “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”.
Quote#3 Buster changes his story back to Jimi being “forced drowned” again
This is called trolling always changing stories and not being serious.
Buster shows his true ignorance in his second quote and proves why he is just a hoaxing clown.
Buster is claiming a forced “wine drowning” in quotes #1 and #3. Anything forced in Hendrix would show signs of forced trauma in the autopsy. The autopsy performed by Dr. Teare showed no signs of trauma from a “forced wine drowning”. This proves there was no “wine drowning”.
I’ve stated this before and this troll changed his story to quote #2 claiming there no “forced drowning” so this fraud could continue his bogus wine hoax.
Whenever you refute his bogus claims he either changes his story or makes up a brand new fake one like a “hard plug of vomit” or “super absorbent bedding”.
Guy is a total clown.
If you read Jason’s clear dodge of Dr Siefert’s saying Jimi was covered in red wine Jason tries to dismiss it by saying Dr Siefert said he detected no alcohol on Jimi and therefore Siefert is discredited for saying two different things…I ask Jason to practice what he preaches and please show us the source for Siefert saying he detected no alcohol on Jimi…In the mean time we can cite a source for Siefert saying Jimi was covered in wine…
Jason is attempting a clear dodging of evidence he knows he can’t answer here…If we viewed the video of Dr Siefert saying Jimi was covered in wine then we have straight clear evidence of the second emergency room doctor corroborating Dr Bannister’s witnessing of the wine…As well as corroboration of the 3rd emergency room doctor, Dr Brown, and his witnessing of the wine…It isn’t as easy to dismiss the wine as Jason wants you to believe…Especially when Jason cannot show any proof for the quote he is using to dismiss it…And even if Siefert did say that, and it is possible he did since he obviously never volunteered any witnessing of the wine any other place than Kramer’s video, then that doesn’t preclude his saying it in the context of a cover-up, since we have evidence of a cover-up in Dr’s Thurston and Teare and their actions…
Since there is much more evidence for the wine than not we have to weigh Dr Siefert’s admission that Jimi was covered in red wine as the straight witnessing it is…Jason can’t get rid of it as easily as he tries…So if Jimi was covered in red wine we must ask why?…Jason already tried to lie and say it was from the wine Jimi drank throughout the evening, but let’s walk that back and examine it…Since Jimi was proven to only have a trace blood alcohol content that means the wine from that evening could not account for the wine Dr Siefert witnessed…Obviously it conforms more to the wine Dr Bannister spoke of soaking the scarf around Jimi’s neck and his afro…Jason tries to pawn-off that wine witnessed by Siefert on to a medically-impossible explanation…If the body digested the wine down to 5mg then that means there was no wine available to be detected in the vomit…So it had to be from another source…
Jason tries to cite the wine Jimi drank that evening as the source of both the wine detected by Brown and Siefert as well as the wine that caused Jimi to overdose and choke on his vomit…However Jimi’s doings were well recorded that evening – as well as his wine consumption…He probably had no more than 2 glasses at Harvey’s party where the witnesses said Monika drank the majority of the wine…Harvey’s was from 6pm to 10pm or so…Jimi then dropped Monika off at the Samarkand and somehow got to Kameron’s at about 11pm…The story at Kameron’s is that it was a straight party with no drugs available and only alcohol…Because of this Devon or Stella went off to procure some drugs and apparently came back with some powdered Orange Sunshine LSD…So if Jimi drank at Kameron’s it was minimal because his friends were quoted as saying he was chipper and attentive right before he left the party…Remember, the reason Jimi went to Kameron’s was because he needed to have a serious talk with Kameron about getting out of lawsuits…The bottom line is the blood alcohol content seen in Jimi at his autopsy shows you he probably didn’t drink anything after Harvey’s…So with this in mind Jason has not credibly addressed why Jimi had wine all over him if this was just a common drug overdose?…Jason is playing his street con shell game and moving the evidence balls around, but you can see he is intentionally hiding the ball that answers for the wine and is doing it by means of dishonest deception…Jason is violating the evidence by failing to account for the difference between the trace blood alcohol content and the wine he has failed to disprove that was admitted by a main medical witness…
Another thing Jason has failed to account for is we pretty much know what Jimi ate that night…He had vegetarian organic food at Harvey’s from the hippy girls that included brown rice…He then had a large serving of rice in some oriental take-out food he ate right before he left Kameron’s at 3am…It is unlikely Jimi ate anything at Monika’s after scarfing that take-out at Kameron’s…Besides, the Samarkand had no cooking or food preparation facilities…So if Jimi was laying in what the ambulance man described as a large “pool” of vomit then what was the liquid component that made it so large?…We have an estimation of what Jimi ate and it was pretty much normal…So what was the extra component that caused it to be such a remarkable amount of vomit? Would the meals we know Jimi ate appear larger if they had been transported to the area of coverage witnessed by the ambulance men by wine that had since soaked in to the bed and made the vomit look larger than its food content actually was?…There was a large amount of vomit because it had been transported by a large amount of wine that caused its forceful ejection…Jason can’t get around it…When the death scene and medical witnessing is honestly evaluated you can’t reconcile the trace blood alcohol content and wine…It is evidence of murder that was obviously avoided by all the authorities who were involved…
Produce evidence of wine on Jimi Hendrix at the death scene. it all starts there. Until you do that, you can’t make your fake wine claims.
The fact is nobody at the flat ever witnessed any wine on or inside Jimi Hendrix.
3 men testified and witnessed Hendrix dead first. Not even one man made slightest hint of wine anywhere involving a death.
That proves there was no wine.
Phony word games isn’t going to help you produce wine at the flat.
You can’t claim wine after the fact when it was never present at the death scene on 9/18/70..
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, says:
October 23, 2019 at 5:13 pm
“Flysquatter knows nothing since he has no evidence he can produce to confirm his phony claims
Another wine hoaxing clown who folds like a cheap deck of cards when confronted with producing real evidence he doesn’t have..”
LOL !! Talk about self-delusion, but no problem — Jason’s statement can be fixed to what it really should say:
Jason has no evidence he can produce to confirm his phony claims. He only has lying misquotes & self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass. Jason is a hoaxing clown who folds like a cheap deck of cards when confronted with factual information (and we can provide some examples, below) regarding the case.
FIXED !!
Here’s one example:
“JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 4:12 pm
Produce evidence of wine on Jimi Hendrix at the death scene. it all starts there. Until you do that, you can’t make your fake wine claims.”
Jason needs to produce evidence that there wasn’t any wine at the Samarkand flat, but he can’t, as evidenced by Jason’s inability to answer “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink”, if there was “no wine” as Jason self-decrees? Jason also can’t refute the fact that Monika told both Sharon Lawrence and Tony Brown that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died. All of Jason’s blather which goes out of its way to avoid these points that have been made repeatedly, just demonstrates Jason folding like a cheap deck of cards.
And more still…………………
“JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 4:12 pm
The fact is nobody at the flat ever witnessed any wine on or inside Jimi Hendrix.”
This is not a fact. It’s just a self-decreed fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass. It doesn’t answer the points made above about what Monika told both Brown and Lawrence, and it certainly doesn’t answer “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink”, if there was “no wine” as Jason self-decrees?
“JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 4:12 pm
3 men testified and witnessed Hendrix dead first. Not even one man made slightest hint of wine anywhere involving a death.
That proves there was no wine.”
Guess again, numb-twat. The ambulance men described a “pool” of vomit and that Jimi was covered in it. The Police Officer stated that Jimi was a mess. Dr. Brown said that he “had a bit too much to drink” <— that right there tells everybody that the wine, as well as the vomit, contributed to the mess & if Dr. Brown saw or smelled (perhaps both) the evidence of wine and detected it — hence, Dr. Brown's reference of "too much to drink" — then the ambulance men and the police saw it or smelled it (perhaps both) , as well. And they never stated anywhere, at any time, that they didn't see wine.
No such description was ever given regarding John Bonham or Bon Scott after these two men died of vomit asphyxiation after heavy drinking binges, like the description the ambulance men and police officer gave of Jimi.
"JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 4:12 pm
Phony word games isn’t going to help you produce wine at the flat."
That works both ways, shit-for-brains. Phony word games isn't going to help Jason produce any evidence that there was "no wine" Nor does Jason's inability to answer what Monika told both Brown and Lawrence, and "what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink", if there was "no wine" as Jason self-decrees?" produce any evidence of "no wine".
"JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 4:12 pm
You can’t claim wine after the fact when it was never present at the death scene on 9/18/70.."
Jason has no proof of anyone claiming wine "after the fact", except himself. It is Jason alone referencing "wine after the fact". Who's the real clown, here? We have stated repeatedly that it was there at the Samarkand on 9/18/1970. Monika told both Brown and Lawrence that it was there on 9/18/1970. Dr. Brown made reference to it as well ,and this was having seen Jimi before Jimi made it into casualty.
"JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 3:56 pm
The autopsy proved Hendrix died of a barbiturate overdose. The forensics proved it and it was conformed by several men"
Just another self-decreed fabrication that Jason pills out of his ass. The autopsy proved that Jimi had ingested a heavy amount of quinalbarbitone, but it didn't prove that was what killed Jimi. The autopsy revealed some collapsing of the left lung and 400ml of free fluid. A Buster had pointed out, but Jason couldn't answer "Jason forgot to include the rest of Crompton’s quote in the same passage on page 182 (of Kathy Etchingham's book): ” He couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid “… Not “vomit” Jason – “fluid”…" & of course Jason has avoided this completely with all his blather, as Jason knows that Bannister stated the same thing.
Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
"JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 3:15 am
Guy is a total clown."
Great self-description of Jason, and it's quite enjoyable watching Jason put a clown suit on himself with all his lying misquotes & self-decreed fabrications that he continues to pull out of his ass.
Of course, in Jason's case, a clown suit wouldn't have to consist of anything more than a prophylactic pulled & fitted snugly over Jason's dick-head. BAHAHAHA !!!
Sorry Flysquatter, no wine was witnessed at the flat.
Brown confirmed it was an overdose as did Reginal Jones
All the testimony and evidence is forever cemented against you.
“JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 8:03 pm
Sorry Flysquatter, no wine was witnessed at the flat.
Brown confirmed it was an overdose as did Reginal Jones.”
TRANLATED: Jason can’t refute the fact that Monika told both Sharon Lawrence and Tony Brown that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died. And Jason can’t answer “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink”, if there was “no wine” as Jason self-decrees?
There was wine at the flat, no matter how much Jason says “no wine at the flat”. And Jason is blatant liar when he says “Brown confirmed it was an overdose as did Reginal Jones”, as neither of these men confirmed any such thing.
“JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 8:03 pm
All the testimony and evidence is forever cemented against you.”
Keep dreaming, dick-head. Jason’s self-decreed fabrications and lying misquotes don’t constitute evidence. The real evidence, that has been shown repeatedly, along with testimony quoted in its correct context is forever cemented against Jason.
You are not a very good troll lol
You still will never produce any wine
“JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 8:44 pm
You are not a very good troll lol
You still will never produce any wine”
TRANSLATED: Jason is a very sloppy liar & can’t produce anything substantial to back his “no wine” claim.
(Hi again everybody, back here with an exciting 4 Part Series. I’ve been really looking forward to this one, where it’s Ex Doctor Bannister’s time in the barrel. He will finally have to answer for all the lies he told during the last couple of decades. He will be exposed for the fraud that he is and no doubt will be left in anybody’s mind. Except for maybe the tin foil hat wine hoaxers who are truly gullible. We already debunked the phony “imbibed wine” myth that just turned out to be a fake quote coming from Sharon Lawrence who already made up other fake quotes in her book. Now we move on to the “main witness” that tin foil hat conspiracy theorists use for their phony “murder by wine theory”. That would be ex fraud Doctor Bannister who made up many phony wine claims over the years. Bannister is the disgraced doctor who made wild claims that Jimi Hendrix was “drowned in wine” but has no evidence to prove that claim. Tin foil hat wine hoaxers profusely defend this man even when he’s proven to be fraudulent. And he certainly will be proven to be just that. Debunking his phony quotes and claims is important to show how he is not a credible witness and a “good doctor”. And that’s why these next 4 parts of this series is dedicated to him. So, are you ready to get started? Let’s go!)
“Debunking Ex Doctor Bannister’s Phony Wine Myth”
Part One
By Jason
Tin foil hat conspiracy theorist wine hoaxers can all thank fraud Ex Doctor Bannister who invented the “Great Wine Hoax” in 1992. Wine hoaxers are now giving him a round of applause as we speak while raising up a bottle of red wine. Raise it to the sky!
This former Doctor Bannister, can be referred to as “The Grandfather of Wine” from now on. Tin foil hatters profusely defend this man and use his phony wine claims as their “evidence” for a “Hendrix wine murder”.
He was being investigated and was then shortly terminated as a doctor for fraudulent conduct in 1992 as a medical professional. He was afraid of being sued again for medical malpractice after he read the book Electric Gypsy so he invented the phony wine claim to cover his own ass. So, the wine myth was born and conspiracy theorists used it for their own gain. Soon after, other fraudsters came out of the woodwork to capitalize monetarily with their own phony astounding wine claims. Not one of these opportunists said a peep about wine in 1970 (cuz there was no wine) but started making their own claims of wine after Bannister stepped into the limelight in 1992 to proclaim his own wine myth.
All these people tried to outdo each other with wild claims of wine. And of course tin foil hatters believed every word of it. Even though they had no evidence and only one sourced quotes and claims, they still believed like morons. But as we know, real evidence, forensic science, and basic common sense refuted them every step of the way.
So, every few years or so when Bannister needed some news media attention, he came out with a different wine claim that contradicted the previous one and added new ones along the way. He showed his clear ignorance, incompetence, and basic lack of understanding each time he spoke out.
Now that you have the background on this Bannister character, we can get this ball rolling. We will look at in great length all the contradictions, lies, confusion, and the incompetence of one Ex Doctor Bannister. And when this series is complete, there will be no doubt in anybody’s mind that Bannister is clearly lying who was just trying to save his own neck and was looking to repair his disgraced reputation while pretending to be a hero. But most of all, best of all, this phony wine myth will be shown to be the fraudulent tale that it is.
“Red wine was coming out of his nose and out of his mouth. It was horrific. The whole scene is very vivid, because you don’t often see people who have drowned in their own red wine.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
Is that so ex Doctor Bannister? Incredible story you told, but where is your evidence? Bannister claims red wine was coming out of Jimi’s mouth and nose at the hospital. But our two expert witnesses ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua refute Bannister’s claim when they both testified that Hendrix only had dry vomit all the way down at the flat. So, where does Bannister’s imaginary wine claim come from? See, you can’t have dry vomit at the flat (where Hendrix died) and then magically be “drowned in wine” a few minutes later at the hospital. That is impossible my friends. Bannister has made up this whole phony wine claim.
“He was covered in vomit, there was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was.” – Reginal Jones Ambulance Man
“I mean the vomit was dry, and there was a hell of a lot of it.” – John Saua Ambulance Man
So, the Ambulance men testified to only witnessing dry vomit. Reginal Jones testified that Hendrix was covered in vomit, and not wine, like Fraud Bannister and conspiracy theorists claim. Also, Saua said he had dry vomit. Vomit can’t be dry when Bannister is claiming a “wine drowning”, which would make it wet, with wine coming out of Hendrix’s mouth. Also, both men witnessed the actual death scene up close unlike Bannister (who never did) and they both never witnessed any “gallons of wine” on, in, or around Hendrix. Wouldn’t “gallons of wine” be present at the death scene if there was a wine drowning? Wouldn’t Jimi Hendrix be “soaked” in wine at the flat as these fraudsters claim? Jones testified to brown and black vomit on the pillow. He stated nothing about Hendrix being “covered in wine” or any wine in the vicinity. He said nothing about red wine which should be there for their phony claims. So, no wine witnessed beforehand, means no wine can be claimed later. Where is the imaginary wine when it was nowhere to be found at the death scene? Now back to Bannister.
Bannister claims this whole scene was “vivid” to him, but as you continue to read on, he contradicts himself in each new interview he gives. Bannister is clearly ignorant about the physical features of Hendrix and actual accounts of September, 18 1970. For someone with such “vivid memories”, he is certainly clueless about that day and is clearly negligent of how a doctor is supposed to operate.
Also, if he never “saw anything like this before”, why is there no documentation of this account of Hendrix in the hospital medical records? Why didn’t Bannister say Hendrix was “drowned in wine” instead of an overdose of barbiturates like he stated in 1970? Can a tin foil hat conspiracy theorists answer that?
If Bannister witnessed something so abnormal like “he never witnessed before” don’t you think this would be newsworthy for him to report? So, he stayed mum all during the media at the hospital asking questions what happened to Hendrix and waited all the way til 1992 to finally say “I’ve witnessed something so incredible about Jimi Hendrix.” Yeah right. Only true idiots would believe in that. See, this exactly fits the pattern with all these fraudsters. Never said a peep in 1970 but decades later all the phony stories come out. Well, that is cuz it never happened on 9/18/70. If it did it would have been known and reported by someone. No “mass wine drowning” could kept under wraps for decades it would have been leaked by someone. That’s another reason why this whole hoax is more phony than a 3 dollar bill.
There is no documentation of a “wine drowning” on record and statement of it in 1970, cuz it never happened in 1970 to document or state. Bannister made the whole thing up in January 1992. This whole phony sham has already been debunked. Do we even need to continue on? Of course we do. More truth needs to be told.
Mr Bannister said, “What struck him most about the ‘unusually tall patient’ was that he was drenched in alcohol.”
Bannister is obviously confused cuz Jimi Hendrix was not an “unusually tall man”. Hendrix wasn’t even 6 feet standing only at 5′ 11″. 5′ 11″ is not an “unusually tall man” and no man would be hanging off a trolley at that height. This contradiction of Hendrix’s height alone should disqualify Bannister as being reliable. Here he claims he has “vivid memories” of all this wine and he can’t even remember the correct height of Hendrix. He also made other contradictions claiming Hendrix was “naked” and then he was “clothed”. Then he only had wine in the “stomach” then it became his “lungs”. Later on, it became wine in both the lungs and stomach. Other contradictions include a full medical staff working on Hendrix to just Bannister himself working on Hendrix. Also, he said working on Hendrix was “merely a formality” to later claims of frantic half hour “wine surging” resuscitation attempts”. Let’s remember that Hendrix was already dead, so Bannister’s new claims of “half hour wine surging resuscitation attempts” is total nonsense. So each interview this man gives, he changes stories while adding new ones. The question any intelligent person must ask themselves is, why didn’t Bannister document all this wine he claims he witnessed back in 1970? And why didn’t he issue wine as the official cause of death back in 1970? Bannister issued the statement that “it was a drug overdose” that killed Hendrix in 1970 and he has absolutely no documentation or evidence of all this wine he claims to have witnessed when he reappeared to make these claims in 1992. Why would a doctor not document all this massive wine he claims to have seen when that is his job? Why would he issue the official statement that it was drugs in 1970 and then claim wine in 1992? Doesn’t add up people.
Don’t forget that Bannister never heard of the name Jimi Hendrix in 1970. He had no idea a rock superstar was dead in his presence. So, Jimi Hendrix would mean nothing to him. That would explain his confusion for Hendrix’s height. But zero evidence and no documentation for all this massive amounts of wine he claims is clearly fraudulent. Back in the real world, and not in the fictional fantasy land of Ex Doctor Bannister and conspiracy theorists, doctors document everything they encounter in a hospital with a patient both dead or alive. They don’t rely on absent evidence and phony claims of what they say they witnessed. That’s how we know this claim is fraudulent. But as we look at all the evidence coming up in this part of the series, It’s obvious that Bannister was indeed lying about this entire incident to protect himself from another possible malpractice suit.
“Somebody said to me ‘You know who that was? That was Jimi Hendrix’ and, of course, I said, ‘Who’s Jimi Hendrix?'” – Ex Doctor Bannister
“I didn’t even know who Jimi Hendrix was.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
So, Bannister makes perfectly clear that he had no idea who Jimi Hendrix was. He hadn’t even heard of him on September 18, 1970. So, the idea he wouldn’t remember anything about him today is pretty obvious since he claims he was “unusually tall” hanging off the trolley by 10 inches. That is not an accurate description of Jimi Hendrix for a man who claims to have such “vivid memories” of the entire incident.
“Jimi wasn’t tall, but when posed with us flanking him, he photographed larger than life.” – Noel Redding
So, the late great Noel Redding, Jimi’s former bandmate, easily refutes Bannister’s incorrect recollection of Jimi Hendrix being “unusually tall”. Redding shot down the phony claims of Bannister who was perpetrating his con on the public. Notice the description Noel gave about Jimi being “photographed as larger than life”. Noel seals the deal here and some people never caught on to what he was saying.
When Hendrix was photographed with the “Experience” (Redding and Mitchell), Hendrix always appeared photographed taller as a giant compared to both of them for publicity value. It’s easy to see here how Ex Doctor Bannister came to the conclusion that Jimi Hendrix was an “unusually tall man”. Bannister admitted he knew nothing about Jimi Hendrix. He had no idea who he was or even heard of him.
So, Bannister not knowing anything about Hendrix saw a photograph of him as “larger than life” and assumed he was “unusually tall” from the picture. That is the only explanation for Bannister’s fallacy of Hendrix being “unusually tall”. If Bannister actually remembered the events of September 18, 1970 he would clearly know Hendrix was not “unusually tall”. Bannister is the only doctor to claim Hendrix was “unusually tall” and had “lungs full of wine”. So, Bannister saw a photo of Hendrix, and not knowing anything about Hendrix, made the false claim of him being “unusually tall”.
“The amount of wine that was over him was just extraordinary. Not only was it saturated right through his hair and shirt but his lungs and stomach were absolutely full of wine. I have never seen so much wine. We had a sucker that you put down into his trachea, the entrance to his lungs and to the whole back of his throat. We kept sucking him out and it kept surging and surging. I would have thought there was half a bottle of wine in his hair. He had really drowned in a massive amount of red wine.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
Bannister gives this account in 2009 of what he claims he witnessed in 1970. Sounds like something so extraordinary that nobody has ever seen before. So, why didn’t Bannister make any documentation about this in Hendrix’s official medical and death report? Wouldn’t you think something as severe as this account would be officially documented in the records? Wouldn’t you think Bannister would have stated to the press that this incident occurred? Bannister said he never “saw so much wine”, but then he doesn’t report it in the medical records, list it as the official cause of death, mention this claimed account in his statement to the press, preserve any of this claimed wine for the coroner to analyze. No doctor on Earth would operate in this fashion.
It’s obvious Bannister is making this whole thing up in 2009 decades later for some publicity. He listed “an overdose drugs” as the official cause of death in 1970. Why on Earth would he state a drug overdose in 1970 when he is making these incredible 2009 wine claims? Wine hoaxers need to answer that question but they can’t.
Bannister was asked about the wine and he claimed he “dumped it all out”. Give me a freaking break. Is anybody stupid enough to believe that?
A liar usually rambles on and keeps repeating their lie. This quote exactly seems to be the case for Bannister who needs to keep repeating the word “wine” as he rambles on. No other doctor made an extraordinary claim like this about Hendrix except for Bannister.
The body was cold, there we no signs of circulation and my overall impression was he’d been dead for several hours. He was completely cold. I personally think he died long before. He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of somebody who had been dead for some time.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
“We had a sucker that you put down into his trachea, the entrance to his lungs and to the whole back of his throat. We kept sucking him out and it kept surging and surging.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
Ex Doctor Bannister gave his diagnosis of the condition of Hendrix’s body that was cold with no circulation. He described Hendrix as being cold and blue with no circulation in his entire body. Bannister estimated through the visible condition of Hendrix that he presumed he was dead for hours. Then Bannister goes on to say he was sucking wine out of him. What would be the point to perform this procedure on a man who’s been dead for hours as he just estimated? Also, where is any evidence and documentation that this procedure ever occurred? None exists and we only have Bannister’s word that it happened. Nobody from St. Mary Abbots hospital has ever stated on record that Jimi Hendrix had wine removal from his lungs. Doctor Bob Brown said “no revival was possible”. Doctor Siefert said Hendrix was only worked on for a few minutes as a formality. Bannister is clearly lying with no evidence to prove his claims and no other doctor ever corroborated his stories. In fact, both Doctor Brown and Siefert refute Bannister in their testimonies. Also, where was all that wine Bannister claimed to have sucked out of Hendrix? That’s right, he said he “dumped it all out”. If any idiot believes that, I have a tropical Island to sell you in Antarctica.
The medical staff used an 18 metal inch sucker to try to clear Hendrix’s airway.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
“We worked on him for about half an hour without any response at all.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
Bannister made perfectly clear in 1993 that the “medical staff” used an 18 inch metal sucker on Hendrix and not himself personally. Later through the years, Bannister contradicted his original claims again to where “he personally cleared wine out of Hendrix. So, Bannister lied again after his original claim.
So, if the “medical staff” used the 18 inch metal sucker on Hendrix then why didn’t any of the medical staff verify this Bannister claim? Dr. Siefert refuted Bannister by stating he worked on Hendrix for only a few minutes cuz he was already dead. Siefert never stated that he or anybody on the medical staff used an 18 inch metal sucker on Hendrix. Doctor Bob Brown refutes Bannister as well, when he stated “there was no revival possible”, which means this procedure was never performed which is why there is no documentation of it ever happening. Bannister is lying again or has Hendrix confused with someone else he may have worked on. There is no medical record of this procedure ever happening on Jimi Hendrix. By law Bannister is required to document every operation he performs on a patient and he can’t destroy bodily fluids by claiming he “dumped it out”. That is illegal.
In the bottom quote, Bannister states “we worked on him for about half an hour”. First of all, Bannister stated in 1993 that Hendrix was already “dead for hours”. So, why would he attempt to work on a dead man who was cold and blue who was dead for hours? Of course there would be no response. That makes no sense to do that. Also, if Hendrix’s body was “full of massive red wine” as Bannister claimed, it would take hours to clear out the wine manually with just a metal sucker, not just a half hour. So, again Bannister makes fatal errors in his statements full of contradictions and showing pure negligence and ignorance on how a doctor would handle a patient in Hendrix’s condition.
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
Bannister told this story in 1993, stating Hendrix was already dead on arrival at the hospital and that he believed Hendrix had been dead for hours. So, why would he attempt to spend over a half hour or more suctioning wine he claimed to have seen out of the lungs of a dead man? Makes no sense at all when he needed to be attending to other emergency situations on people who were actually alive.
“Red wine was coming out of his nose and out of his mouth. It was horrific. The whole scene is very vivid, because you don’t often see people who have drowned in their own red wine. There was red wine all over him.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
“The amount of wine that was over him was just extraordinary. Not only was it saturated right through his hair and shirt but his lungs and stomach were absolutely full of wine. I have never seen so much wine.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
“He was covered in vomit, there was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was.” – Reginal Jones
“I mean the vomit was dry, and there was a hell of a lot of it. The vomit was all the way down.” – John Saua
So, we have ex Doctor Bannister making the extraordinary claims of wine over 20 years after the death of Hendrix. Bannister claims that Hendrix was “covered in wine” and that his lungs and stomach were “full of wine” with it coming out of his nose.
But we have our expert witnesses ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua to refute Bannister’s phony wine claims. Their credible testimony viewed Hendrix dead first at the death scene before Bannister. Bannister never witnessed the death scene which makes his phony story not credible. Both men never testified to viewing Hendrix being “covered in wine”. Jones stated Hendrix was covered in vomit. Saua testified that Hendrix had dry vomit all the way down when he used the aspirator. Neither men testified to viewing any wine on or inside Hendrix at the death scene. It would be totally impossible to have dry vomit at the flat and then “gushing” red wine at the hospital as Bannister claimed. That story is a fraud.
So, how did Hendrix get saturated with wine all over his body and in his lungs and stomach when the ambulance men never saw a drop of wine on or inside Hendrix when they viewed him and performed medical tests on him? You can’t have no wine at the flat and then have wine appear like magic when ex Doctor Bannister made his phony wine claims over 20 years later. That is totally impossible. Fraud ex Doctor Bannister has been refuted with his bogus wine story.
“I think that he was naked but he had something around him, whether it was a towel or a jumper around his neck.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
“He was on top of the bed dressed.” – John Saua
So, ex Doctor Bannister says he thought Hendrix was “naked” after he claimed Hendrix was soaked in red wine. John Saua refutes Bannister’s claim of Hendrix being “naked” when he testified to Hendrix being dressed on the bed.
So, Jimi Hendrix must have been a magic “quick change artist”. He was fully clothed covered in vomit with no signs of wine for the ambulance men, but quickly appeared naked soaked in wine with it flooding his lungs and stomach just for ex Doctor Bannister. Does anybody actually believe the crap Bannister is trying to claim? Bannister has no clue what he is talking about. It’s easy to see why he was convicted for fraud, malpractice, and basic ineptness. He claims Hendrix was naked covered and flooded with wine when he has no evidence of this happening. But we have two qualified ambulance men testifying with separate accounts who refute Bannister’s b.s. tales of fantasy.
“We worked on him for about half an hour without any response at all. There was a medical registrar, myself, nursing staff and I think one other doctor.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
Jimi was rushed into the resuscitation room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes, he
was dead.” – Doctor Siefert
Ex Doctor Bannister now claims he worked on a dead Hendrix with other medical staff for a half an hour. Bannister already stated Hendrix was dead for hours when he arrived. Why would a full medical staff spend their precious time working on a dead man when they need to be attending to other emergencies? Working on a dead person isn’t going to bring them back to life. Bannister is not credible at all, which is why he was struck off the medical register for fraud and malpractice.
Now we have another Doctor who refutes Bannister’s phony claim. Doctor Siefert stated that he only worked on Hendrix for a few minutes. Not for a half hour with full medical staff like Bannister tried to claim. Siefert saw Hendrix was dead and knew nothing more could be done. Siefert sounds credible as what a legitimate doctor would do in that situation.
Ex Doctor Bannister said he had a full medical staff with him working on Hendrix. Siefert worked on Hendrix as well. Nobody else on the medical staff could verify Bannister’s phony wine claims. And why didn’t Bannister make this wine story public on 9/18/70 if he never saw anything like this in his life? It never happened, that’s why. Bannister made up the story in 1992 cuz he thought he was going to be sued again for medical malpractice. Doctor Siefert totally refutes Bannister’s lie.
“The medical staff used an 18 inch metal sucker to try to clear Hendrix’s airway, but it would just fill up with wine from the stomach.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
Ex Doctor Bannister claimed in 1993 that the medical staff worked on Hendrix to clear an airway. Years later Bannister changed his story to that “he worked personally” on Hendrix. Notice he also says “wine from the stomach” and not “lungs” as he claimed later on. Yes, it’s clear that Bannister is a fraud and is making up different stories each time he talks about it.
“Hendrix did not have an obstruction of the airways. What he had, was that he had a drowning of the airways.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
“His airway was completely blocked all the way down, his tongue had fallen back, he was flat on his back you see.” – Reginal Jones
Well, it looks like the fraud ex Doctor Bannister was caught in another lie. Reginal Jones who saw Hendrix dead first completely refutes another phony claim by Bannister. Jones testified that Hendrix’s airway was completely blocked due to dry vomit that his partner John Saua also testified to. Fraud Bannister tried to change his story to “drowning of the airways” which is totally impossible. Saua used an aspirator on dry vomit inside Hendrix. There was no wine suctioned out of him when he worked on him. Bannister is a fraudulent liar who has been exposed by both ambulance men.
Well, Ex Doctor Bannister the “main witness” for conspiracy theorist wine hoxers doesn’t appear to be faring too well with all his lies, inconsistencies, and contradictions he has made. We will see how he does coming up in Part 2 as he makes more wild claims of wine. But we can certainly say his phony stories has already been debunked.
TRANSLATED: Jason’s blather demonstrates his inability to answer “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had anything to drink”, if there was “no wine” as Jason self-decrees? Jason also can’t refute the fact that Monika told both Sharon Lawrence and Tony Brown that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died. All of Jason’s blather does, is out of its way to avoid these points that have been made repeatedly, and demonstrates Jason folding like a cheap deck of cards.
Flysquatter is still crying about the one bottle of wine that everybody already knew was there. You are still missing the 5 bottles of wine, moron.
Flysquatter continues to make a fool of himself like his head hoaxer does on a regular basis.
Doctor Bob Brown made his comment almost 40 years after Jimi’s death. Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.
Teare found that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml, enough to fail a breathalyzer test.
Doctor Bob Brown said Hendrix had “a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. That was the ‘bit’ he was referring to.
Also, the vomit analysis was performed to determine which drugs Hendrix took. Wine was never in play on 9/18/70.
There never was a “wine drowning” this is a hoax perpetrated by frauds and they have no evidence of “wine” to prove their phony clams.
Flysquatter is a true moron.
Hi Jason. Jimi had wine to drink earlier in the evening. Drinking wine is totally irrelevant in this argument because these two have continually said that Jimi was murdered by waterboarding with wine. As stated previously it is illegal to tamper medically with a body when brought into casualty as medical staff must wait for the official findings of the coroner. Dr Bannister would not and could not have witnessed the wine if Jimi was DOA or indeed the other doctors. Dr Seifert said that Jimi was flatlined when brought in and he pounded his chest to establish time of death. No form was filled out to suggest that these five bottles of wine existed since Jimi was handed over to the coroner for the autopsy after casualty. The ambulance officers are required by regulation to assist in any way they can before anyone reaches the hospital and it is then up to the doctors in casualty to officially pronounce someone dead. The personnel did what was required of them that morning. Jimi could not have been brought back to life if he had been dead for as long as he was therefore the doctors would not have even attempted a resuscitation. It’s curious that no report written in the 70’s ever mentions wine as cause of death only barbiturate intoxication. It’s pretty obvious this story was invented years later and spread by wine hoaxers. Really enjoyed your well researched post Jason keep up the good work.
Hello Ivana,
The actual wine that Jimi drank during the evening was evidenced in Teare’s autopsy which debunks the phony “wine drowning” claim.
These two wine clowns claim a “waterboarding by wine murder” but have no evidence of wine of the “crime” they claim happened.
If that much was poured as they claim, the room would have smelled from wine and so would Jimi’s body. Jones and Saua never said a word about wine or smelling alcohol. Officer Smith said nothing about alcohol either.
Jimi was indeed a DOA and would not have any procedures done on him. Siefert and Brown already stated that.
If any of these “procedures” were performed then there would be recorded documentation of it happening. None exists.
Also, no alcohol related death was ever documented or reported on 9/19/70. It was a confirmed drug overdose.
Hey Buster, you gotta love this……
JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 8:15 pm
“Flysquatter continues to make a fool of himself like his head hoaxer does on a regular basis.”
Quite the contrary. I’m making Jason look a fool. And Jason makes that so easy to do, as will be illustrated here:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 3:20 am
“Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix. Brown only said he had a “bit too much to drink”.”
And next we have this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:04 pm
“We all know Hendrix was drinking wine during the evening at Harvey’s flat. He had more wine with Monika before he took a bath and wrote his final poem “The Story of Life”. Then he had more wine at Kameron’s party when he ingested a powerful amphetamine and ate a rice meal. This is the ‘bit ‘ too much Brown was talking about. Brown never said Hendrix was ‘drowned in wine’ like these wine hoaxers claim.”
Jason is first claiming that “Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix” and then same-day he is claiming that the wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s and Cameron’s was the “bit too much Brown was talking about”. Of course, as stated earlier — the autopsy revealed a blood alcohol content of .005%, meaning that any wine that Jimi drank at either of those two places was long digested and gone — meaning there is no way Dr. Brown could be referencing wine that may have been drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s. Can’t have it both ways.
Now we get this, as a result of Jason tripping over his own tongue & getting exposed doing so……………..
“JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 8:15 pm
Doctor Bob Brown made his comment almost 40 years after Jimi’s death. Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.
Teare found that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml, enough to fail a breathalyzer test.
Doctor Bob Brown said Hendrix had “a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. That was the ‘bit’ he was referring to.”
Yes indeed, when Jason uses the word “moron”, he sure does give an exact description of himself. Just how far did Jason have to dig into his own ass to pull out this self-decreed fabrication (we do know that it took him over a week). No need for Jason to tell us what he is, as we already know & can easily illustrate it.
Can’t have it all three ways, dipshit.
1) Dr. Brown never made any reference to any autopsy data in any of his statements…..EVER !! Just another self-decreed fabrication that Jason is pulling out of his ass. Brown was telling of what he saw on Sept 18, 1970 when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots. The time frame of 40 years makes no difference. Jason is making his self-decreed fabrications nearly 50 years later, so what is Jason’s point about Dr. Brown making his comment 40 years later? ZERO !!
2) Teare stated he was ESTIMATING a blood alcohol content of 100mg at time of ingestion of the pills. Teare reported that Jimi’s blood alcohol content was .005%. Why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make the estimation of 100mg BAC at the time of Vesperax ingestion, if there was “no wine”, as Jason keeps self-decreeing?
Very sloppy liar that can’t get his facts straight.
“JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 8:15 pm
Flysquatter is still crying about the one bottle of wine that everybody already knew was there. You are still missing the 5 bottles of wine, moron.”
Who said anything about “one bottle”, other than Jason? Monika told Tony Brown that she had two bottles of wine. First Jason says “no wine” at the flat, then says “one bottle of wine that everybody already knew was there.”
Can’t have it both ways, STUPID.
The exact amount of wine at the Samarkand isn’t known. What is known is that Jimi’s lungs and stomach were flooded with enough wine that they worked on Jimi for nearly a half-hour removing it. The hospital report stated the treatment time of 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Plus Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi “couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid” & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs — debunking the claim that “no work was done”, as these lying-denying pigbreeders keep regurgitating.
Here we go again with this wine nonsense. You have continually stated that Jimi died because he was waterboarded to death with wine. You are focusing on the blood alcohol content only and not the urine content which was 46mgs. Dr Crompton said that Jimi’s liver was so congested because of the barbiturate level that he could not have survived. He did not say that Jimi died because of the wine. What are you not understanding in this story exactly? The wine is totally irrelevant in this story unless you choose to believe that Jimi was murdered; only then does it become an issue. Dr Seifert was waiting for Gerry Stickells to formally identify the body so he could complete the paper work as none of the personnel on duty knew who Jimi was. We have repeatedly stated that resuscitation is attempted only on immediate death and never on someone who died hours before like Jimi had. Jimi had all the tell tale signs of someone who died hours before as confirmed by the ambulance officers and doctors. They did not say that Jimi was unconscious but flatlined/dead. Jimi could not have been brought back to life and the doctors would have known this through experience and not wasted their time on a futile exercise. This tallies precisely with Dr.Seifert waiting for Gerry to identify the body. All this conspiracy rests with Bannister and Wright whose bogus stories never existed in the 70’s. The fluid in Jimi’s lungs was uncovered during the autopsy and not in casualty as we have been insisting all along. Are you following this story correctly? All was revealed during the autopsy and not in casualty as you have been suggesting.
Flysquatter is a moron who fails to understand that no wine was witnessed by ambulance men or police at the flat. There was no suctioning of Hendrix since he was a dead corpse turning black.
The wine that Hendrix drank during the evening registered in the autopsy. There was no “massive wine” drowning.
Bob Brown was citing the autopsy report.
Funny how this troll takes my comments out of context but never can take the time to prove any real evidenc his phony case.
TRANSLATED: The two lying-denying pigbreeders can’t provide any credible reference sources that contains any testimony to back their false claims.
Only self-decreed fabrications that they pull out of their asses & they just keep wallowing in their own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
Flyswatter: Did you notice what an obvious bullshit artist Jason is?…I mean the way he writes shows someone who needs to conceal his ill-intent in a build-up of bullshit sort of like a con man spiel…The form of how he writes bespeaks someone who has to mask his bad intentions in blather…Does he honestly think he’s fooling anyone with that?…He’s obviously trying too hard to discredit Bannister because deep down he knows there’s something there…Just the form of how Jason writes gives him away and I’m sure most people can see it…
If you take Jason’s tent preacher load of bullshit approach away from him and make him answer the more credibly explained detailed facts you will see Jason’s snake oil tent collapse like it does every time we deconstruct his lies…
I’d like to find out who this scumbag Jason is because he has elevated this to the level where we need to go after him and make him account for his criminal slander…I know Dr Bannister personally and he is a real gentleman…It pisses me off to see an internet crazy defaming him so badly when I know he is opposite how he is being portrayed by this piece of shit Jason…
Jason is lying when he says Dr Bannister fabricated the wine account in order to escape another malpractice suit…Jason is a real asshole because it wasn’t possible to sue Bannister for malpractice under the British National Healthcare system…Jason is dumb because on one hand he is saying Jimi was dead for hours before he got to hospital…So what exactly was Bannister going to be sued for if by Jason’s own words Jimi was dead for hours?…And why then would Bannister fabricate a drowning in wine story over something he couldn’t possibly be sued over?…Jason is so full of Satanic fervor over his sick trolling that he makes huge stupid mistakes like this because he isn’t paying attention to the material…After all, once you are riffing denial bullshit like Jason why pay attention to simple facts that make you crash and burn stupidly like he does here?…
Jason is a sick troll so any accusations he makes against Bannister shouldn’t be taken seriously, however he said that Bannister fabricated the story about the wine in 1992…I spoke to Bannister and he led me to a witness who heard him tell this story in the 1970’s and over the years before his letter to Glebbeek and long before any de-licensing…So there’s another one of Jason’s idiotic trolling denials shot down…Jason is the proven liar here not Dr Bannister…
Jason is such a demented liar that he says above that Dr Bannister “contradicted himself in each new interview he gave”…I have researched Dr Bannister and his story…I found that it never varied one iota in every instance I could locate…Meanwhile the person who Jason is really talking about is Monika Dannemann whose story changed every time she told it…Jason, of course, never offers a word of criticism towards her…Also, while Jason is trying to distract us with yet another con man speech he never mentions the real culprit here, Dr Siefert, who is the person with the dubious motive whose story should be scrutinized…
Jason makes another one of his asinine assertions by saying Dr Bannister’s mention of the medical staff working on Jimi was proof that he was a fraud…That accusation is absurd because Bannister was simply using English terminology to express the fact Siefert and the nurses and himself were all working on Jimi…I know Dr Bannister and he was reticent to accuse Siefert so he was simply alluding to Siefert being right there with him without saying it directly…Siefert was there for the full half hour that this lying piece of shit Jason is denying…Dr Bannister told me himself…Only a trolling nut would make an issue over the semantics of referring to the “medical staff”…Bannister is simply saying the team at St Mary’s and himself worked on Jimi…
The reason Bannister never said Jimi was drowned in wine on the hospital report is because, just like the ambulance attendants, he thought the wine was part of the vomit at the time and assumed it had been aspirated…
Jason continues to contemptuously ignore that the 20 minutes of suctioning wine and 10 minutes of trying to resuscitate Jimi was recorded in the hospital report…Jason is a crazed lunatic who ignores evidence and repeats the same disproven claim in the very next post…
There’s an easy explanation for the phony speculation Jason offers above…Siefert and Bannister were informed that they had failed to save the world’s most important and famous rock artist…They simply did not volunteer anything from that point on like their professional practices advise…
Jason’s smear sheet on Bannister above fails to consider that Bannister was just a new intern at the time…It was Dr Siefert who was the senior doctor and was in charge of those medical observations…Jason pretends to not notice that we have no idea what was relayed to the autopsy and what wasn’t…We have good reason to believe there was a cover-up involved, so Jason doesn’t really know that the information about the wine wasn’t recorded or passed along by the doctors…Proof of that cover-up is Dr Thurston knowing about the stomach full of wine…Jason is violating the evidence by trying to blame Bannister for everything when any simple check showed Siefert was the head registrar…
We have reason to think there was a cover-up because Scotland Yard never interviewed Dr Bannister…Jason is hoping we don’t notice that there was an attempt to report the wine and the authorities acted like guilty parties…Not only did they avoid interviewing Bannister but they never bothered to do basic police procedure and interview the attending nurses (medical staff)…Scotland Yard deliberately avoided the nurses and there was just no excuse for it…They did that deliberately because they knew the nurses would force the case to be re-opened by speaking of witnessing Bannister removing the wine…You can be sure if Jimi had overdosed and they only worked on him for a minute, and there was no wine removal, Scotland Yard would have gotten those nurses quickly…This lying asshole Jason asks why no medical staff spoke of using the sucker on Jimi?…It never dawns on our resident moron troll that they never mentioned it because they were deliberately avoided by the authorities…The nurses would also have confirmed the half hour treatment time…
Bannister did not confuse Jimi with another patient…He mentioned Monika’s large scarf that Jimi was wearing in his first 1991 account…Bannister in Australia had no way to know about that large scarf unless he witnessed it in person…
The liar Jason tries to make Bannister look like a stumbling fraud but the truth is he ran a medical consultation business for the rest of his career with no issues and made millions because of his skill and professionalism…I hope Bannister sees this dirty defamation by Jason and sues him for it…Bannister lost his license because they needed to destroy him because he witnessed a government murder…These people kill Hendrix’s and then destroy the witnesses…
I’m glad Jason has now become a fan of Dr Siefert and called him a “credible doctor”…Jason can keep that in mind when we show Dr Siefert on video saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…That admission, of course, overturns and refutes the many weeks worth of bullshit Jason has written above and corroborates Bannister…
It is amazing how full of shit Jason is…
I’ll try to find the statement from the ambulance men where they said their ambulance sucker was too flimsy to remove the hard dry vomit so they quit and piled Jimi in to the ambulance to get him to better equipment at St Mary’s…
More trolling denial from Buster the clown since his hoax has been exposed.
Bannister lost his medical license for fraud and it’s very easy to see why. Says Jimi was dead for hours and then claims to be working on him for a half hour when no other doctor ever verified any procedures done nor does he have any documentation of performing such work.
The metal sucker he claimed he used would take hours to clear wine out of a body. That’s why this is all a hoax. Then we have a kook like you promoting these bogus claims who has been shown to be a fraud as well.
He is a bumbling fool making up fake stories and changing them as the years go by.
You still have no evidence of these procedures and no documented evidence and you are just angry that the truth was shown.
You’re not a very clever troll Jason…I have seen the hospital report and it said that Jimi was treated from 11:45 to 12:15…Jason is an obvious internet asshole who is just hurling what we accuse him of back at us and mocking us with it…The way to determine who is right, when both sides are calling each other trolls, is to look for who the evidence backs…It backs us because there is a hospital report that we can search for and eventually produce that exposes Jason’s lies and shows who is telling the truth and who is credible here…Jason says I don’t have any documentation however when we produce the hospital report and it says exactly what I quoted Jason will respond by switching the subject and entering another overly-long denial speech that repeats once again his already disproven simple lies and deceptive distortion of context and quotes…He’ll do what he always does and try to switch the subject and enter another overly-aggressive attack that tries to seize the narrative in order to make me answer yet another round of wholly disingenuous bullshit lies, contrivances, putting words in my mouth I never said, and re-entering another false cooking of the evidence, in order to dodge answering that documentation…The hospital report says they worked on Jimi from 11:45 to 12:15…That is exactly what doctor Bannister told me…Bannister also told me they went to a rest room for the doctors after failing to save Jimi…That is also reflected in the hospital report because Jimi was not declared deceased until 12:45, as indicated on that report sheet…
If anyone reads this sub-thread I showed where Jason outwardly lied or presented false claims in his previous posts in my last response…As Jason’s reply shows, he was literally unable to answer those refutations…Jason stupidly claimed Bannister lied about the wine in order to escape a potential malpractice lawsuit over Jimi…But Jason ignored that his own material claimed Jimi was dead for hours by the time Bannister treated him, so how could he be sued for malpractice involving a patient who was dead for hours?…Jason’s claim was so STUPID that he literally had to ignore it…Jason never answered why Bannister would concoct a phony wine claim over something he knew he couldn’t be sued over?…Jason claimed Bannister fabricated the story in 1992…He never answered the witness Bannister pointed me to who heard him tell about the wine in the 1970’s and up to 1991…Jason lied and said Bannister’s story changed each time he told it…I’m an expert at Bannister’s public statements and I found that his story was identical every time he told it…Jason can’t produce those changes in Bannister’s story because he’s lying and Bannister never changed his story…
It is pretty dumb to be silent about Scotland Yard never showing any interest in Bannister or the nurses…Jason’s moronic silence sort of makes a mockery of his blowhard swagger and he sort of mocks his own self with it for those who deal in reality…
Buster continues on with more of his phony wine claims. But he still won’t tell us who he thinks poured the imaginary wine inside Jimi.
BUSTER says: Bannister said that Monika’s scarf that was around Jimi’s neck was saturated in wine and his afro had pure wine soaking it like a sponge.
JASON says: Why didn’t the ambulance men witness the scarf saturated in wine or his afro looking like a sponge? You said that Hendrix was only covered in vomit. Where did the wine come from after the fact?
BUSTER says: Jason also ignores that we have Monika herself admitting that she poured wine on Jimi…
JASON says: Why didn’t the ambulance men witness this wine when they only witnessed dry vomit?
You lose your phony “wine drowning” each time you say this. Having wine poured on Jimi is not having wine poured inside Jimi. Bob Brown, the ambulance men, Officer Ian Smith, Dr. Siefert, Dr. Teare, Dr. Thurston all confirm it was a drug overdose.
BUSTER says: Jason tries to dishonestly get around Monika’s admission by saying its source, Sharon Lawrence, wasn’t credible…But seeing how Jason denies all the main witnesses and calls them all liars and hoaxers we can easily see who is the liar here and who is not reliable.
JASON says: Is Sharon Lawrence credible when she wrote in her fiction book that Jimi was born at a family friend’s house? Is Sharon Lawrence credible when she wrote in her fiction book that Jimi committed suicide?
BUSTER says: That video, of course, totally refutes the nay-saying little piss Jason who tried to con us with “Dr Siefert never witnessed any wine”…Turns out he did and Jason is lying…
JASON says: Siefert is on record stating that he detected “no alcohol on Jimi”. So no, I am not “lying”. How can Siefert witness wine on Jimi when everybody at the flat witnessed only vomit?
BUSTER says: The way Jason tries to dishonestly get around Siefert and Bob Brown’s confirmation of Bannister is by inserting a false context to the emergency personnels’ witnessing at the Samarkand…
JASON says: You are clearly delusional. Doctor Bob Brown refutes Fraud Bannister’s phony wine drowning claims. Bob Brown said Hendrix died from inhalation of vomit due to a barbiturate overdose like the official record states. Brown also stated that no “revival was possible”. Fraud Bannister claimed Hendrix was “drowned in wine” and did 30 minute resuscitation attempts. Brown refutes that phony claim.
I’ve directly quoted everything that John Saua and Reginal Jones stated from their testimony. You are lying claiming they witnessed “pools of wine” and “hard plugs of vomit”. They never ever said that. You are also debunking your own claim of a “drowning of the airways” to a blocking of the airways which results from a suffocation of vomit. So, again you refute your own phony claims by claiming a hard plug of vomit that results from a drug overdose not a drowning. You have no idea what you are even claiming.
Dr. Rufus Crompton concluded that the barbiturate level in Hendrix’s blood, 0.7 mg/100 ml, was above the toxic level of 0.5 mg/100 ml.
So, this toxic level of barbiturates with the addition of the “black bomber” Hendrix ingested at Kameron’s party plus the wine he consumed that evening which was a ‘bit’ above the legal limit is what led to Jimi’s death.
These are real forensics not a bunch of garbage that Buster claims for his phony forensics based on an assumed time line that has no credibility.
Every time Jason posts he falsely portrays the evidence…Jason says my timeline “has no credibility”…However the 5:30am time of death that was determined from the undigested rice in Jimi’s stomach was established by none other than Jason’s source above – Dr Crompton…It is kind of dumb for Jason to not realize that and stumble over himself like he does in every post…Jason name-calls but he never touches my forensic argument directly because he can’t…That argument is water-tight which is why Jason embarrasses himself by only being able to name-call it but never intelligently address it…
Crompton wasn’t perfect on everything…I think he was trying to get rid of Kathy so he simply went along with the barbiturates being responsible…We know that the investigation was corrupted….The same people who corrupted the original investigation got to Crompton and he did not pursue the new evidence Kathy revealed…Jason dishonestly pretends that there are never scandals and persons in governments never do cover-ups and never commit crimes…In any case Crompton suggested that Jimi could have taken as few as 5 pills from those blood levels but he failed to recognize that the product manufacturer determined you needed 9 tablets to reach lethal dose threshold for a person with no tolerance…
Jason has still failed to answer the fact the product manufacturer for Vesparax listed in its drug description that Lethal Dose was “9 to 10 tablets”…Jimi took 9 with a famous tolerance…No matter how many times Jason or anyone else tries to fudge the forensics this is the dominating determiner and Jimi would not have died from the 9 tablets he took…This was also repeated by some German doctors Monika hired to see if her pills would have killed Jimi…They told Monika no, her pills would not have killed Jimi…
Jason is simply seeking excuses so he has no problem with Crompton not doing any analysis of how his 5:30am time of death affects the barbiturate forensics…Peak blood levels can be reached in as little as an hour with Vesparax so Jimi could have taken the pills as late as 4:30am and still had the same autopsy readings…So if Crompton had done the job Kathy went to him for he would have found exactly what I found – that persons who took 1 to 6 more pills than Jimi died in no less than 4 hours…Jason is an idiot and his trolling responses come nowhere near to answering my ironclad forensic arguments that prove homicide…Jason is just going to have to get used to the fact that the reason he can’t put a scratch on my forensic arguments is because they are damningly conclusive and can’t be refuted, as Jason proves here…My forensic arguments are what Crompton and Teare should have done but didn’t…There was serious malfeasance committed against Jimi that the perpetrators hoped no one would notice…Well I noticed and in 10 years no one has been able to refute my proof – that includes Jason…
Crompton was quoted by Kathy as saying the barbiturates would not have killed Jimi because he wasn’t breathing by the time he reached hospital because his lungs were full of fluid…Jason once again dishonestly regresses in the evidence in order to keep up his lies…
BUSTER says: Every time Jason posts he falsely portrays the evidence…Jason says my timeline “has no credibility”…However the 5:30am time of death that was determined from the undigested rice in Jimi’s stomach was established by none other than Jason’s source above – Dr Crompton…It is kind of dumb for Jason to not realize that and stumble over himself like he does in every post…Jason name-calls but he never touches my forensic argument directly because he can’t…That argument is water-tight which is why Jason embarrasses himself by only being able to name-call it but never intelligently address it…
JASON says: Yes, your phony “timeline” has no credibility and neither do you.
Your phony “forensic” argument is based on Jimi taking a lethal amount of barbiturates and claiming “he couldn’t die since he had a famous tolerance to drugs so it had to be wine”. But you have no evidence of the wine you claim to prove. Hilarious.
You phony claim is a fallacy, since you are trying to disprove something that already happened with your own fake opinion claiming it didn’t.
You are trying to argue against cemented evidence that proves Jimi took a lethal amount of drugs. In fact, Crompton said that the amount was more lethal than was believed. That blows your phony claim right out of the water.
And you never state in your phony “timeline” the “black bomber” Jimi took before which killed him. If Jimi hadn’t ingested that pill he most likely would have survived.
I’ve refuted all your phony claims but then you claim I never answer them. You are trolling or have severe memory loss. Go see a doctor.
BUSTER says: Crompton wasn’t perfect on everything…I think he was trying to get rid of Kathy so he simply went along with the barbiturates being responsible…We know that the investigation was corrupted….The same people who corrupted the original investigation got to Crompton and he did not pursue the new evidence Kathy revealed…Jason dishonestly pretends that there are never scandals and persons in governments never do cover-ups and never commit crimes…In any case Crompton suggested that Jimi could have taken as few as 5 pills from those blood levels but he failed to recognize that the product manufacturer determined you needed 9 tablets to reach lethal dose threshold for a person with no tolerance…
JASON says: LMAO.
Here we go again with another phony story telling session from Buster the clown. Making up more bullshit in his crazy head full of “cover ups” and “getting rid of Kathy”. Let’s add Crompton to the “cover up” list. All the readers laugh at you.
You also are forgetting to mention the “black bomber” Jimi took which killed him mixed with the Vesparax.
BUSTER says: Jason has still failed to answer the fact the product manufacturer for Vesparax listed in its drug description that Lethal Dose was “9 to 10 tablets”…Jimi took 9 with a famous tolerance…No matter how many times Jason or anyone else tries to fudge the forensics this is the dominating determiner and Jimi would not have died from the 9 tablets he took…This was also repeated by some German doctors Monika hired to see if her pills would have killed Jimi…They told Monika no, her pills would not have killed Jimi…
JASON says: You should really see a doctor about your severe memory loss since I’ve already answered your phony claim. It also could be the fact you are a really bad troll who has no evidence for your phony claims.
What the Vesparax manufacturer or German doctors said is irrelevant to Jimi’s situation. You whole phony “forensic” claim is a joke based on this.
Jimi took a “black bomber” before he took the the 9 Vesparax.
The Vesparax manufacturer and German doctors are not including that in their findings. And neither are you in your phony “forensic” timeline.
Are you that stupid? How many times does this need to be told to you?
BUSTER says: Jason is simply seeking excuses so he has no problem with Crompton not doing any analysis of how his 5:30am time of death affects the barbiturate forensics…Peak blood levels can be reached in as little as an hour with Vesparax so Jimi could have taken the pills as late as 4:30am and still had the same autopsy readings…So if Crompton had done the job Kathy went to him for he would have found exactly what I found – that persons who took 1 to 6 more pills than Jimi died in no less than 4 hours…Jason is an idiot and his trolling responses come nowhere near to answering my ironclad forensic arguments that prove homicide…Jason is just going to have to get used to the fact that the reason he can’t put a scratch on my forensic arguments is because they are damningly conclusive and can’t be refuted, as Jason proves here…My forensic arguments are what Crompton and Teare should have done but didn’t…There was serious malfeasance committed against Jimi that the perpetrators hoped no one would notice…Well I noticed and in 10 years no one has been able to refute my proof – that includes Jason…
JASON says: i’ve already destroyed your phony “forensics” which you just made up in your crazy head.
Your phony claim is already destroyed since you are arguing against drugs and have no evidence to prove with your imaginary wine.
You keep talking about how “9 Vesparax could never kill Jimi who had a famous tolerance to drugs” which is based solely on your opinion. But you never mention the powerful “black bomber” that ended up killing him mixed with 9 Vesparax which is 18 times the normal amount.
You ridiculously claim “homicide” when you can’t offer one single shred of proof to prove your phony case. All you make is excuses for your lack of “evidence”.
You wasted 10 years probably arguing the same stupid shit over and over and never got anywhere close to prove your hoax. You are still at the same point as you were 10 years ago with nothing. 10 years from now you will still have nothing since your imaginary evidence doesn’t exist. It only exists in your crazy head.
BUSTER says: says: Crompton was quoted by Kathy as saying the barbiturates would not have killed Jimi because he wasn’t breathing by the time he reached hospital because his lungs were full of fluid…Jason once again dishonestly regresses in the evidence in order to keep up his lies.
JASON says: Buster dishonestly again leaves out the “black bomber” that killed Jimi.
Even Kathy said it did.
10 years and counting and Buster the clown still has nothing….not much of a “Jimi Hendrix expert”.
If Bannister had removed five bottles of wine from Jimi in casualty then the coroner would not have been able to detect the grains of rice in Jimi’s stomach as these would have been flushed out. The ambulance officers detected no wine in or around Jimi at the time they saw only dry vomit. The aspirators used on Jimi would have found traces of wine mixed in with vomit if there was any. I wonder if Monika was trying to save herself from charges of manslaughter or negligence by hiring these German doctors. Is it a coincidence that Monika’s father owned a large pharmaceutical company in Germany. The Vesparax contributed to Jimi’s death by inhibiting his coughing reflex therefore causing him to choke on his own vomit. The wine is totally irrelevant in this story as it did not cause Jimi’s death. The autopsy revealed exactly what the cause was-the ingestion of sleeping pills. It is standard for tin foil hatters to invent scenarios of foul play, subterfuge, murder, corrupt individuals, doctored evidence and government officials. It is a common thread behind all their bogus claims. There is no truth in it whatsoever and Buster is just another hoaxer in a long line of hoaxers trying to imply that Jimi was murdered by devious individuals when his sources have been exposed to be liars and frauds.
Sister Ivana Sow sits in her mommies basement picking fabrications out of her ass with her toothbrush.
And both Sister Ivana Sow and her mommy are so fat and ugly that they both use a washing machine for a vibrator.
Flysquatter. This comment just reinforces and emphasises what I’ve thought about you all along-a dim witted childish buffoon who has no life but sits by his computer writing derogatory comments about people who disagree with him. Imagine siding with Buster the clown instead of the forensics only a fool would do this. Can’t you handle the truth? Since Buster has avoided answering who murdered Jimi perhaps you would be so kind as to answer it for him. Please don’t continue to fall back onto Michael and Monika will you as this will make you look like an even bigger fool.
TRANSLATED: Sister Ivana Sow just keeps wallowing in her own pigshit mire of denial of reality — and can’t stomach getting her head handed to her ( or perhaps it is her ass, as it is doubtful anyone would be able to tell the difference) in a war of words.
Time for Sister Ivana Sow to go back to her pig-trough & eat more of her slops , so she can spew more of her own pigshit mire out of her anal sphincter for herself to keep wallowing in.
Dr Teare had no way of knowing that Jimi had oriental food containing rice at Kameron’s…He hadn’t interviewed any witnesses or even known Jimi was at Kameron’s when he did the autopsy…Therefore he had to have witnessed the rice in Jimi’s stomach because he had no way of knowing about that oriental food unless he saw it in Jimi’s stomach at the autopsy…I’m sure some rice remain’s behind in the Duodenum after profuse vomiting…
Spot on Buster, regarding Teare. Crompton later on did have the knowledge of Jimi being seen eating a rice meal just before leaving Cameron’s — hence Crompton’s analysis that Jimi died no later than 5:30AM at the latest.
And, as we both know, it is Sister Ivana Sow that can’t stomach the truth, as evidenced by her continually spewing out her lies through her anal sphincter and trying to call it “truth”, but it isn’t.
It’s laughable for her to be stupid enough to think that somebody, who is a lover and maker of lies herself, would be given any credence regarding what she thinks, by anyone possessing any common sense and logic.
LOL , look below Buster…..
Sister Ivana Sow went back to her pig-trough & ate more of her slops , so she can spew more of her own pigshit mire out of her anal sphincter for herself to keep wallowing in.
Look at her first sentence of “Do you really think I would be foolish enough to fall for anything you two put out here.”
That answer to that is, anyone can see she’s willing to believe her own lies, so who knows what else she is willing to believe?
And is she really stupid enough to think we’d believe anything that SHE puts out there? Oh wait…..yeah, she is that stupid…..that’s already been established.
Flyswatter: Ivana’s not too bright because she says above that Dr Teare would have found traces of the wine in the vomit samples if it existed…But then she doesn’t realize that she herself says part of the reason Jimi died was because he mixed barbiturates with alcohol…The reason Ivana isn’t very intelligent is because she doesn’t realize Dr Teare himself said Jimi’s blood alcohol content was 100mg at the time of ingestion of the pills…That 100mg would be the wine Ivana stupidly says wasn’t there in the vomit…That’s kinda dumb and it is why I am ignoring Ivana…She’s obviously a troll who is trying to get us to take her moronic entries seriously…By the way, neither Jason nor Ivana can show us any evidence that the vomit was ever tested…
You are quite correct, Buster…………..
If brains were made of cotton, then Sister Ivana Sow wouldn’t have enough to make a Kotex for a pissant.
These liars can’t answer what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink upon Dr. Brown sighting Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots. Or the fact that Monika told Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died
Theses liars can’t answer that the hospital report stated the treatment time of 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Plus Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi “couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid” & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs — debunking the claim that “no work was done”, as these lying-denying pigbreeders keep regurgitating.
Moron Flysquatter is like his head hoaxer who repeats the same b.s. over and over.
FLYSWATTER says: These liars can’t answer what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink upon Dr. Brown sighting Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots. Or the fact that Monika told Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died.
JASON says: Flysquatter has a severe reading comprehension problem who can’t read what was already posted before.
Dr. Teare found in his autopsy results that Jimi Hendrix had a blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml, which was enough to fail a breathalyzer test. Bob Brown was citing this report, moron.
Wow….Sharon Lawrence again….same woman who said Jimi Hendrix committed suicide. You believe her?
Funny how no medical man or police witnessed any wine “drowning scene”.
BUSTER says: Flyswatter: Ivana’s not too bright because she says above that Dr Teare would have found traces of the wine in the vomit samples if it existed…But then she doesn’t realize that she herself says part of the reason Jimi died was because he mixed barbiturates with alcohol…The reason Ivana isn’t very intelligent is because she doesn’t realize Dr Teare himself said Jimi’s blood alcohol content was 100mg at the time of ingestion of the pills…That 100mg would be the wine Ivana stupidly says wasn’t there in the vomit…That’s kinda dumb and it is why I am ignoring Ivana…She’s obviously a troll who is trying to get us to take her moronic entries seriously…By the way, neither Jason nor Ivana can show us any evidence that the vomit was ever tested…
JASON says: It’s very clear that this moron has no idea how police operations work with the coroner’s officer. He took the remaining pills, blankets, and vomit sample to determine which drugs Hendrix took. That is standard procedure. it was already reported back in 1970 that this was done. But in the alternate reality of demented wine hoaxers its all fantasy where magic wine appears.
BUSTER says: Dr Teare had no way of knowing that Jimi had oriental food containing rice at Kameron’s…He hadn’t interviewed any witnesses or even known Jimi was at Kameron’s when he did the autopsy…Therefore he had to have witnessed the rice in Jimi’s stomach because he had no way of knowing about that oriental food unless he saw it in Jimi’s stomach at the autopsy…I’m sure some rice remain’s behind in the Duodenum after profuse vomiting
JASION says: Who cares where and who Jimi ate rice with. That isn’t your problem. And you make another bogus claim for the remains of rice.
Jason digs his hole deeper every time he posts…Jason makes no attempt to answer what was said…Ivana said there was no wine detected in the vomit…I pointed-out that her own material possessed information that showed evidence for the wine she was saying didn’t exist…You can’t have Dr Teare saying there was a 100mg blood alcohol content without there being any wine…Apparently Jason is swinging so wildly and blindly that he’s not even paying attention to what was said…Not only is it dumb for Ivana to make that original statement but is is equally dumb for Jason to not answer it so badly like he does here…Get back to us Jason when you can answer the point about Ivana stupidly contradicting her own material…
Jason keeps referring to vomit samples that were tested…The autopsy requires any vomit samples, and their results, to be posted on the autopsy sheet…There are no such samples or tests…The body is the best source for evidence and that was already detailed in the autopsy report…
The reason Jason is responding with these incoherent responses is because he is employing a trolling technique that is designed to frustrate the opponent when he is unable to directly answer facts and evidence…
Jason says I offered bogus claims for the rice but he never details what that bogus claim was or why it was bogus?…That’s because he can’t and Jason is just a internet troll who is posting crazy shit as long as we are stupid enough to reply…
All that is happening here is Jason is unable to credibly answer the evidence we are posting…
BUSTER says: Jason digs his hole deeper every time he posts…Jason makes no attempt to answer what was said…Ivana said there was no wine detected in the vomit…I pointed-out that her own material possessed information that showed evidence for the wine she was saying didn’t exist…You can’t have Dr Teare saying there was a 100mg blood alcohol content without there being any wine…Apparently Jason is swinging so wildly and blindly that he’s not even paying attention to what was said…Not only is it dumb for Ivana to make that original statement but is is equally dumb for Jason to not answer it so badly like he does here…Get back to us Jason when you can answer the point about Ivana stupidly contradicting her own material…
JASON says: You’ve dug your hole and already fell through the Earth.
All you can do is play fake word games when everything will always be against you.
Jimi was drinking wine during the evening which was determined by Dr Teare. He was not “forced drowned” in wine as you claim. Therefore the vomit showed no evidence of your fake “wine drowning”.
BUSTER says: Jason keeps referring to vomit samples that were tested…The autopsy requires any vomit samples, and their results, to be posted on the autopsy sheet…There are no such samples or tests…The body is the best source for evidence and that was already detailed in the autopsy report…
JASON says: John Saua took a vomit sample to be tested at the hospital. The coroner”s officer took the pills, blankets, and a vomit sample. This was all reported in 1970. The death scene was analyzed looking for what drugs he took, moron. Wine was never in play in 1970. Phony wine claims started in 1992.
BUSTER says: The reason Jason is responding with these incoherent responses is because he is employing a trolling technique that is designed to frustrate the opponent when he is unable to directly answer facts and evidence
JASON says: You have no evidence LOL
BUSTER says: Jason says I offered bogus claims for the rice but he never details what that bogus claim was or why it was bogus?…That’s because he can’t and Jason is just a internet troll who is posting crazy shit as long as we are stupid enough to reply…
JASON says: Your posts are useless so quit replying to mine. Read the upcoming Part 4 of my Bannister series and find out.
BUSTER says: All that is happening here is Jason is unable to credibly answer the evidence we are posting.
JASON says: You have no evidence and you never will.
Do you really think I would be foolish enough to fall for anything you two put out here. The forensics speak for themselves conducted by highly regarded and experienced professionals and revisited again by Kathy Etchingham. According to Dr. Crompton it takes four hours for the stomach to empty therefore Jimi died two or three hours after eating his rice meal between 3 or 4 am. Regardless of this nothing can alter the fact that Jimi had a toxic level of barbiturate in his system which suppressed his cough reflex causing him to choke on his own vomit. This is the truth of the matter. If Jimi took the pills with the wine then this is a lethal combination in itself but the wine had nothing to do with his death as this was very well established and recorded at the inquest. The presence of the rice in Jimi’s stomach was used as a means to establish time of death and the fact that they were even witnessed means that the copious amount of wine used to waterboard Jimi as you two suggest could not have existed as the wine would have flushed these out by Dr Bannister in casualty. But this is all irrelevant as the cause of death was inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication as concluded by Dr. Teare. You hang on to the waterboarding scenario because it suits your agenda accusing these professionals of changing their findings because they were threatened to do so. Who exactly supplied you with this bogus information you certainly would need a source for your claims or is your information just as bogus as you are. Just keep going with your hoax because you will eventually be laughed off this thread as you have from the others. Jason and myself do not use speculation to form our opinions but go by the established findings; you two on the other hand view these findings with suspicion and regard them as false therefore you question everything regardless of whether it is true therefore nothing you say can be taken at face value or trusted. Wright’s book came out with the waterboarding murder but this has been exposed as a lie yet you are still clinging onto its claims; nothing published close to Jimi’s death ever suggested such a thing so it’s pretty obvious this has been invented later on in order to sell books. But you are still clinging to this hoax despite the supposed murderer Michael Jeffrey being in Spain but you have even disputed this fact even though it was confirmed by two people but you still haven’t disclosed who the murderer actually was. I’m waiting for your answer.
Jason is trying to fast-talk his way around the fact we know Jimi only drank about 2 glasses of wine at Harvey’s from 7pm to 10pm…He dropped Monika off and then went to Kameron’s where the other people from Hendrix’s group said there were no drugs and only alcohol so one of the girls went off looking for some drugs…This tells you Jimi was not intending to drink much at Kameron’s because his entourage wanted to make him happy so they went off looking for some drugs to satisfy Jimi’s not wanting to drink…If we tabulate the blood alcohol from Harvey’s it was probably not more than 40 or 50mgs that digested down by the time of Jimi’s death…If Jimi had another glass of wine at Kameron’s that would be another 20mgs…But Jimi was at Kameron’s from 11pm to 3am…So that wine also digested down…Jason is taking hip shots hoping he can produce enough wine in Jimi to use it as a reason for his death, however we are seeing amounts of wine from that night that make total sense in relation to the 5mg blood alcohol content at autopsy…If you read the accounts, his entourage said he was chipper and attentive when he went to the kitchen to scarf down that rice-containing food at 2:45am…Jimi felt guilty because they had ordered the oriental take-out for him because he was the star of the party…So Jimi went in to the kitchen and socialized with them and wolfed down a large portion in order to make them feel good…That’s the kind of guy Jimi was…He liked to be polite and kind to people, especially ones that did favors for him like going out of their way to buy him exotic food…So Jimi was not drunk and he did not have the 100mgs of blood alcohol illegally estimated by Dr Teare…Jimi was notorious for not being able to handle his drink so if he had that 100mgs they would have noticed…Again – the reason Jimi had the scientifically-measured 5mg blood alcohol content at his autopsy is because he hadn’t drank that much that night and there wasn’t any alcohol input that caused his death…
It is becoming clearer and clearer to me that Dr Teare participated in the cover-up…He knew it was illegal to estimate a blood alcohol content but he did it anyway because he knew the real forensics were not pointing towards accidental death…Teare was the number one autopsy pathologist in England at the time…He wasn’t a fool and he knew what he was looking at…That’s why he went that direction…In any case, for Teare to have estimated a 100mg blood alcohol content at the time of ingestion of the pills means he assumed the wine that Dr Thurston spoke of was involved and could be used as reference in case anyone asked…In other words Teare was well aware of the wine and used it in his cause of death determination…Jason ignores this to his permanent discredit…
What Dr Teare was never pressed on was the fact his illegal estimate of the blood alcohol content at time of ingestion of the pills was based on Monika’s false timeline…Teare based that estimate on Monika’s story where Jimi took the pills shortly after 7am and died enroute to the hospital at 11:40am…However Teare was never made to account for the fact that the only way Jimi could have a 100mg blood alcohol content at time of ingestion of the pills is if he drank that wine at the Samarkand in between 3am and 7am…But we know that story is false and Jimi never had that casual 4 hours with Monika talking to her on the bed like Monika said…We know Jimi got back from Kameron’s at about 3:15 and died at 5:30am…So for Teare’s estimate to be correct Jimi would have needed to be drunk when he got back from Kameron’s…Not only did the witnesses prove that to not be true, but Jimi’s 5mg blood alcohol content at the time of death also proves that didn’t happen, because I don’t think you can digest 100mg down to 5mg in only 2 hours…
I’m sure the alcohol digestion that occurred in Jimi could be forensically extrapolated by means of the 46mg urine alcohol content…It all depends on when Jimi last urinated and how it related to the last wine he drank that night…But no matter how it translates it still doesn’t change the fact that Jimi was murdered by being drowned in wine and that the wine in question was credibly witnessed by Dr Bannister…As we can see Jason never touches the true forensics involved with the wine…
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
Flysquatter has a severe reading comprehension problem who can’t read what was already posted before.
Dr. Teare found in his autopsy results that Jimi Hendrix had a blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml, which was enough to fail a breathalyzer test. Bob Brown was citing this report, moron.”
Guess again, shithead. I already read that and called it out as another self-decreed fabrication that Jason took well over a week to dig out of his ass. Dr. Brown was NOT citing any autopsy report, and never mentioned anything about the autopsy report in any of his statements.
And Jason’s lie doesn’t answer what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink upon Dr. Brown sighting Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots.
It’s Jason that has the severe reading problem, as I quoted that BS about
And once again, Jason can’t answer that the hospital report stated the treatment time of 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Plus Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi “couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid” & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs — debunking the claim that “no work was done”, as these lying-denying pigbreeders keep regurgitating.
Jason hasn’t answered this because he’s still digging into his own ass trying to find a self-decreed fabrication. So far Jason can only claim “no work” was done, but has nothing to back up this self-decreed BS.
Flysquatter the angry troll has all the evidence stacked up against him forever.
Doctor Bob Brown cited the final report by Dr Teare which clearly shows Jimi had a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. His level was slightly above the legal limit. But a wine troll like you denies real evidence for your fantasy evidence you don’t have.
Doctors don’t perform “work” on a cold and blue dead corpse with black membranes already identified by Bannister.
Produce some documentation this “wine removal” was performed
Yes Flyswatter…Almost everything Jason posts has no accurate relation to the true evidence or record…Just to show what trolling liar Jason is, Dr Teare never found any “autopsy results” for the 100mg blood alcohol content…Just the opposite is true and Teare never produced any autopsy result indicating a 100mg blood alcohol content…Ask Jason to produce that “result” and you will be replied to with more demented bullshit like Jason offers here…Teare made a special annotation in the autopsy that he was going to “estimate” a 100mg blood alcohol content at the time of ingestion of the pills…The reason Teare made that illegal estimation is because he knew the actual 5mg blood alcohol content that was measured was too low and there was a problem with it so he illegally tweeked that result upward in order to produce evidence for the wine he knew was unaccountably not registered in that 5mg blood alcohol content reading…
Jason is straight-out lying when he says Teare’s 100mg estimation is what Dr Brown was referencing…The source of Dr Brown’s statement that Jimi had too much to drink was Brown’s description of his walking along side the gurney when Jimi was wheeled in to the hospital…Brown was obviously talking about the wine that Dr Siefert also described Jimi being covered in…We can go get those articles where Dr Brown described this and it is clear Brown was describing what he saw when he observed Jimi when he was being wheeled in to the hospital…There is no doubt that Brown was saying that he thought Jimi had too much to drink from what he saw…Jason is dumb because Brown is still alive and could clarify this…
BUSTER says:Yes Flyswatter…Almost everything Jason posts has no accurate relation to the true evidence or record…Just to show what trolling liar Jason is, Dr Teare never found any “autopsy results” for the 100mg blood alcohol content…Just the opposite is true and Teare never produced any autopsy result indicating a 100mg blood alcohol content…Ask Jason to produce that “result” and you will be replied to with more demented bullshit like Jason offers here…Teare made a special annotation in the autopsy that he was going to “estimate” a 100mg blood alcohol content at the time of ingestion of the pills…The reason Teare made that illegal estimation is because he knew the actual 5mg blood alcohol content that was measured was too low and there was a problem with it so he illegally tweeked that result upward in order to produce evidence for the wine he knew was unaccountably not registered in that 5mg blood alcohol content reading…
JASON says: More garbage from you claiming a “cover up” that doesn’t exist. The facts are cemented and documented against you and all you can offer is a bogus commentary.
BUSTER says: Jason is straight-out lying when he says Teare’s 100mg estimation is what Dr Brown was referencing…The source of Dr Brown’s statement that Jimi had too much to drink was Brown’s description of his walking along side the gurney when Jimi was wheeled in to the hospital…Brown was obviously talking about the wine that Dr Siefert also described Jimi being covered in…We can go get those articles where Dr Brown described this and it is clear Brown was describing what he saw when he observed Jimi when he was being wheeled in to the hospital…There is no doubt that Brown was saying that he thought Jimi had too much to drink from what he saw…Jason is dumb because Brown is still alive and could clarify this…
JASON says: Buster the clown lies again for his debunked phony wine claim. You are dumb, since he already clarified it in his interview. Brown does not believe Hendrix was “murdered”.
Bob Brown never witnessed Jimi being “drowned in wine” since he was the first Doctor to view him. The ambulance men saw no wine on Jimi so that debunks your phony claim.
“He’d had a bit too much to drink and whatever else and had inhaled vomitus.” – Doctor Bob Brown
JASON says says: Brown says Jimi had a “bit” too much to drink. He never said he was “drowned” in wine. The autopsy results clearly shows Jimi was slightly above the legal limit. That is a “bit” too much. Brown also says Jimi inhaled vomit. He never said he was “drowned in wine”.
And now pathetically you attempt to discredit the results cuz you are a fraud.
“I was doing locum, and I happened to be in the causality at St Mary’s Abbott when Jimi Hendrix was brought in. The man had been dead some time. The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Doctor Bob Brown
JASON says: Brown confirms Jimi was on arrival dead citing an overdose. He never says anything about wine. He also says no revival was possible cuz he was dead. Dead people don’t have “procedures” done, moron.
Brown refutes you as well does all the evidence against you.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
Flysquatter the angry troll has all the evidence stacked up against him forever.”
Does Jason mean like this evidence here?:
The hospital report stated the treatment time of 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Plus Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi “couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid” & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs — debunking the claim that “no work was done”, as these lying-denying pigbreeders keep regurgitating.
Of course, anyone can see that evidence is stacked against Jason only.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
Doctor Bob Brown cited the final report by Dr Teare which clearly shows Jimi had a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. His level was slightly above the legal limit. But a wine troll like you denies real evidence for your fantasy evidence you don’t have.”
Pot calling the kettle black. This is not real evidence, this is just a self-decreed fabrication that Jason took week over a week to dig out of his own ass. Dr. Brown NEVER cited the autopsy report in any of his statements, anywhere, at any time.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
Doctors don’t perform “work” on a cold and blue dead corpse with black membranes already identified by Bannister.”
They did with Jimi, no matter how hard Jason jacks off with his “no work done” denial. The hospital report says that they did work on Jimi for a 1/2 hour. Page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book published in 1990, makes that very same reference to the 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
Produce some documentation this “wine removal” was performed”
And this coming from a jack-off like Jason, that can only produce lying misquotes and self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass, with absolutely no credible resources or documentation to back it up?
Pot meet kettle — we are both colored BLACK.
All Jason is really saying is that he can’t answer that the hospital report stated the treatment time of 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Plus Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi “couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid” & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs — debunking the claim that “no work was done”.
And Jason still can’t answer the question what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink upon Dr. Brown sighting Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots? And Jason’s fabricated lie about “Dr. Brown citing the autopsy report” constitutes NO answer.
FLYSWATTER says: Jason hasn’t answered this because he’s still digging into his own ass trying to find a self-decreed fabrication. So far Jason can only claim “no work” was done, but has nothing to back up this self-decreed BS.
JASON says: Yes, wine troll I’ve answered this over and over.
Doctor Bob Brown made his comment almost 40 years after Jimi’s death. Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.
Teare found that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml, enough to fail a breathalyzer test.
Doctor Bob Brown said Hendrix had “a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. That was the ‘bit’ he was referring to.
Refuted your hoax once again.
“JASON says: Yes, wine troll I’ve answered this over and over.
Doctor Bob Brown made his comment almost 40 years after Jimi’s death. Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.
Teare found that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml, enough to fail a breathalyzer test.
Doctor Bob Brown said Hendrix had “a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. That was the ‘bit’ he was referring to.
Refuted your hoax once again.”
Keep dreaming, shitball. Just a copy and paste job of the third hoax that took Jason well over a week to pull out of his ass, because he still can’t answer what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink?
No credible reference sources to back this self-decreed fabrication = no answer or refutation.
Here’s another fantasy commentary by Buster the clown.
He claims a “cover up” again since all the evidence is against him.
He makes things up in his crazy head to still make his phony claims.
He also got caught changing his phony stories again cuz he is a troll.
Yet, Buster the clown still hasn’t produced one single shred of evidence to prove there was a “wine drowning” for his fake hoax and he never will.
Produce some documents that a “wine removal” and a “hard plug of vomit” removal was performed by Fraud Bannister on a cold and blue corpse already dead for several hours.
BUSTER says:Jason is trying to fast-talk his way around the fact we know Jimi only drank about 2 glasses of wine at Harvey’s from 7pm to 10pm…He dropped Monika off and then went to Kameron’s where the other people from Hendrix’s group said there were no drugs and only alcohol so one of the girls went off looking for some drugs…This tells you Jimi was not intending to drink much at Kameron’s because his entourage wanted to make him happy so they went off looking for some drugs to satisfy Jimi’s not wanting to drink…If we tabulate the blood alcohol from Harvey’s it was probably not more than 40 or 50mgs that digested down by the time of Jimi’s death…If Jimi had another glass of wine at Kameron’s that would be another 20mgs…But Jimi was at Kameron’s from 11pm to 3am…So that wine also digested down…Jason is taking hip shots hoping he can produce enough wine in Jimi to use it as a reason for his death, however we are seeing amounts of wine from that night that make total sense in relation to the 5mg blood alcohol content at autopsy…If you read the accounts, his entourage said he was chipper and attentive when he went to the kitchen to scarf down that rice-containing food at 2:45am…Jimi felt guilty because they had ordered the oriental take-out for him because he was the star of the party…So Jimi went in to the kitchen and socialized with them and wolfed down a large portion in order to make them feel good…That’s the kind of guy Jimi was…He liked to be polite and kind to people, especially ones that did favors for him like going out of their way to buy him exotic food…So Jimi was not drunk and he did not have the 100mgs of blood alcohol illegally estimated by Dr Teare…Jimi was notorious for not being able to handle his drink so if he had that 100mgs they would have noticed…Again – the reason Jimi had the scientifically-measured 5mg blood alcohol content at his autopsy is because he hadn’t drank that much that night and there wasn’t any alcohol input that caused his death…
JASON says: I guess Buster the clown was there that night incognito to keep tabs on Jimi’s drinking of wine at Harvey’s and Kameron’s. Did you also witness the “wine drowning scene” on the “super absorbent bedding” you now claim?
This clown has no idea what Jimi was doing. This is another bogus pathetic story he made up to discredit the autopsy results since it destroys his phony hoax.
Too bad for you Buster the clown, cuz it’s already documented and confirmed.
Buster the clown can only make up fake stories and “evidence” in his crazy head for his hoax since all the real evidence will forever be cemented against him.
BUSTER says: It is becoming clearer and clearer to me that Dr Teare participated in the cover-up…He knew it was illegal to estimate a blood alcohol content but he did it anyway because he knew the real forensics were not pointing towards accidental death…Teare was the number one autopsy pathologist in England at the time…He wasn’t a fool and he knew what he was looking at…That’s why he went that direction…In any case, for Teare to have estimated a 100mg blood alcohol content at the time of ingestion of the pills means he assumed the wine that Dr Thurston spoke of was involved and could be used as reference in case anyone asked…In other words Teare was well aware of the wine and used it in his cause of death determination…Jason ignores this to his permanent discredit.
JASON says: it’s clear that you are a hoaxer or have severe mental issues always claiming a “cover up” when forensic evidence is always against you. This is all delusional fantasy in your crazy head.
BUSTER says: In other words Teare was well aware of the wine and used it in his cause of death determination
JASON says: Really? That’s not what you said on October 11.
BUSTER says: October 11, 2019
Dr Teare had no way of knowing about the wine because it was removed and disposed of 3 days earlier at the hospital.
JASON says: You said on October 11 that Dr Teare had no way of knowing about the wine. And now say he does?
Ladies and Gentlemen, this is just another perfect example that shows Buster the clown is just a troll who changes his stories to win his “phony debate”. He is a joke not to be taken seriously. We have all his lies and quotes here in public domain. Buster can’t run and hide from all the lies he says. All your lies have come back to haunt you early before Halloween.
BUSTER says: October 11, 2019
Dr Teare had no way of knowing about the wine because it was removed and disposed of 3 days earlier at the hospital.
BUSTER says: October 25, 2019
In other words Teare was well aware of the wine and used it in his cause of death determination.
On October 11 Buster says Dr Teare had no way of knowing about the wine.
Today on October 25 Buster says Dr. Teare was well aware of the wine.
Which is it Buster? You can’t have it both ways. Was he not aware or aware?
Once again you’ve been caught red handed trolling changing your phony stories to win your “fake debate”. You do this all the time which is why everybody laughs at you.
Your “murder claim ” is a joke. The only thing you can do is switch your phony claims when it suits you.
The rest of your post is the same garbage commentary you make up in your crazy head for your debunked joke of a hoax.
TRANSLATED: Accuse the other side of that which Jason himself is guilty of, as can be illustrated here:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 3:20 am
“Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix. Brown only said he had a “bit too much to drink”.”
And next we have this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:04 pm
“We all know Hendrix was drinking wine during the evening at Harvey’s flat. He had more wine with Monika before he took a bath and wrote his final poem “The Story of Life”. Then he had more wine at Kameron’s party when he ingested a powerful amphetamine and ate a rice meal. This is the ‘bit ‘ too much Brown was talking about. Brown never said Hendrix was ‘drowned in wine’ like these wine hoaxers claim.”
Jason is first claiming that “Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix” and then same-day he is claiming that the wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s and Cameron’s was the “bit too much Brown was talking about”. Of course, as stated earlier — the autopsy revealed a blood alcohol content of .005%, meaning that any wine that Jimi drank at either of those two places was long digested and gone — meaning there is no way Dr. Brown could be referencing wine that may have been drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s. Can’t have it both ways.
Now we get this, as a result of Jason tripping over his own tongue & getting exposed doing so……………..
“JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 8:15 pm
Doctor Bob Brown made his comment almost 40 years after Jimi’s death. Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.
Teare found that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml, enough to fail a breathalyzer test.
Doctor Bob Brown said Hendrix had “a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. That was the ‘bit’ he was referring to.”
Yes indeed, when Jason uses the word “moron”, he sure does give an exact description of himself. Just how far did Jason have to dig into his own ass to pull out this self-decreed fabrication (we do know that it took him over a week). No need for Jason to tell us what he is, as we already know & can easily illustrate it. Brown NEVER cited the autopsy report in any of his statements, anywhere, at any time.
Jason talks about “reading comprehension”, but does Jason even read his own lies? Apparently not, and it appears that Jason needs to have all three of those lies put into braille and shoved up his ass for Jason to comprehend that he can’t have it all three ways.
First we get “Brown saw no wine”, then next we get “the wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s and Cameron’s was the “bit too much Brown was talking about””, then when neither of the first two work & the contradiction gets exposed, we get “Brown was citing the autopsy report as being the bit too much to drink”.
Very sloppy liar that can’t get his lies in order regarding Dr. Brown.
And Jason’s lies don’t answer what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink upon Dr. Brown sighting Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots.
And once again, Jason can’t answer that the hospital report stated the treatment time of 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Plus Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi “couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid” & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs — debunking the claim that “no work was done”, as these lying-denying pigbreeders keep regurgitating.
You are really bad at trolling.
If you don’t know the difference between Jimi actually drinking wine at a party versus your fake Jimi “covered in wine” claim then you need serious mental help.
Keep posting, you keep making a fool out of yourself with your bogus hoax.
“JASON says:
October 25, 2019 at 2:11 pm
You are really bad at trolling.
If you don’t know the difference between Jimi actually drinking wine at a party versus your fake Jimi “covered in wine” claim then you need serious mental help.
Keep posting, you keep making a fool out of yourself with your bogus hoax.”
Awwwww……did poor little baby Jason poop in his diaper & does Jason now need his mommy to change Jason’s diaper for him, fetch Jason his formula for him, and give Jason a Baby Pat-A-Burp doll to put on his shoulder, so that Jason can cry on its shoulder?
Let’s all have a pity party for Jason……………1,2,3………..AWWWWWWWWWW
Jason sure likes to keep wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, as anybody can plainly see, it is Jason that is being made a fool out of by getting his lies exposed.
Jason, once again, isn’t answering the point…Dr Brown could not have been talking about the wine Jimi drank that night because it had digested down to 5mg which was too little to be detected in any vomit on Jimi…Jason stupidly doesn’t realize any vomit inside Jimi when he had that 5mg blood alcohol content was technically “upstream” from Jimi’s system where that 5mg was recorded and therefore could not possess enough detectable alcohol to make Dr Brown say that…Jason is avoiding giving any direct answer to this…
Who do you think you’re fooling with this bullshit Jason?…Dr Brown was obviously referring to the wine Jimi was soaked in that both Dr Siefert and Dr Bannister witnessed…
BUSTER says: Jason, once again, isn’t answering the point…Dr Brown could not have been talking about the wine Jimi drank that night because it had digested down to 5mg which was too little to be detected in any vomit on Jimi…Jason stupidly doesn’t realize any vomit inside Jimi when he had that 5mg blood alcohol content was technically “upstream” from Jimi’s system where that 5mg was recorded and therefore could not possess enough detectable alcohol to make Dr Brown say that…Jason is avoiding giving any direct answer to this…
JASON says: Doctor Bob Brown gave his interview to The Courier Mail 42 years after Jimi died. He simply said he had a “bit too much to drink” then then after said he “inhaled vomit” which confirms the drug overdose. You can’t weasel your way out with your alternative garbage you spout off.
Teare clearly showed that Jimi’s level was slightly above the limit. That’s was Brown was citing. The evidence is cemented against you and you lose.
BUSTER says: Who do you think you’re fooling with this bullshit Jason?…Dr Brown was obviously referring to the wine Jimi was soaked in that both Dr Siefert and Dr Bannister witnessed…
JASON says; Who do you think you are fooling when not one ambulance man or police man witnessed Jimi being soaked in wine?
Now you make up another phony claim. Brown never stated “Jimi was drowned” in wine.
Guess you gave up on the wine you claimed was inside Jimi cuz there is no record of that.
Teare clearly showed that Jimi’s level was slightly above the limit. That’s was Brown was citing. The evidence is cemented against you and you lose…moron.
Here’s another fine example of how Buster the clown changes stories all the time when it suits him. He is just a troll who has no evidence to back up his phony claims. He can only change his phony stories. Pathetic!
Buster the clown is not to be taken seriously when he keeps playing these story changing games.This is the definition of a troll.
BUSTER says: October 11, 2019
Dr Teare had no way of knowing about the wine because it was removed and disposed of 3 days earlier at the hospital.
BUSTER says: October 25, 2019
In other words Teare was well aware of the wine and used it in his cause of death determination.
JASON says: Buster says on October 11 that Dr Teare had no way of knowing about the wine.
Today on October 25 Buster says Dr. Teare was well aware of the wine.
Which is it Buster? Was Teare not aware or was he aware?
Do you forget the phony claims you make Buster?
Why do you purposely change your stories all the time?
Chalk this up at another phony attempt for Buster to change his phony stories when it suits him. He purposely changes stories for each argument. That is called trolling since he has zero evidence to provide and he never will. His hoax is just a way for him to argue in a “debate” to pass the time. Hendrix died of a drug overdose. All the evidence is cemented against Buster. These wine clowns prove it all the time for us.
Hi Jason. It’s pretty obvious these two are making it all up as they go along. They keeping changing the main points when it suits them but can’t answer a simple question of who murdered Jimi since Michael was in Spain and Wright’s book is a complete lie. Without these they have no story even though they still think they do. They are both out to deceive.
Hi Ivana,
These two clowns are providing pure comedy.
Buster the clown can’t even keep his stories straight.
His hoaxing sidekick Flysquatter keeps posting my quotes that refutes his phony hoax.
i hope he keeps it up.
They have nothing except to discredit the real evidence and make stuff up.
The wine is irrelevant in this scenario because you cannot alter the fact that Jimi died of a toxic level of barbiturates. Do you really think the coroner would have missed the copious amount of wine that you are suggesting Jimi died of. It is illegal for any doctor to tamper with a dead body in casualty before the coroner. If Jimi was unconscious when brought into casualty then this would have warranted the half hour resuscitation attempt. You continually make allegations of murder by waterboarding with copious amounts of wine but strange how this amount of wine was absent in the coroner’s report and at the Samarkand. Some wine witnessed implies a small amount and not five bottles worth if any at all like Bannister says. Dr Teare did not base his findings on what was said by anyone but on the autopsy finding and what they revealed. You are always coming up with alternative scenarios and forensics as if you are the real expect in this case anything to prove that Jimi was murdered. Theses lies came out with Wright’s long discredited story of waterboarding with wine and Bannister’s ludicrous revelations decades later of the five bottles of wine. Oddly none of this scenario existed in the 70’s. As said over and over again Dr Seifert was waiting for Gerry Stickells to identify the body in the morgue so he could state time of death. What is it about this story that keeps both of you clinging onto a murder scenario when the murderer was in Spain, Wright’s book was a lie and Bannister failed to speak up in 1970. You keep peddling a bogus story along with your dubious forensics although everything about this was exposed as a lie long ago . Kathy’s investigation left no stone unturned and even this failed to detect a murder but you are still milking this for all it’s worth and have still come up empty. Jimi died of an overdose of barbiturates which caused him to choke on his own vomit and not copious amounts of red wine end of story. The autopsy would not have failed to detect the copious amounts of red wine in and surrounding Jimi if the body was left in its original condition in casualty that morning. It can be said then that Jimi was not covered in the amount of red wine that Bannister witnessed if he DOA unless he was unconscious when brought in but the account from everyone that morning suggested that Jimi had all the tell tail signs of someone who had been dead for a while. Therefore the large amount of wine was non existent. You cannot keep pushing for a murder if the murderer was in Spain and the copious amount of red wine was non existent. Everything you suggest here is a hoax. No amount of name calling with make you look any more credible it makes you look like mutton dressed as lamb.
And again………………
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 3:20 am
“Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix. Brown only said he had a “bit too much to drink”.”
And next we have this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:04 pm
“We all know Hendrix was drinking wine during the evening at Harvey’s flat. He had more wine with Monika before he took a bath and wrote his final poem “The Story of Life”. Then he had more wine at Kameron’s party when he ingested a powerful amphetamine and ate a rice meal. This is the ‘bit ‘ too much Brown was talking about. Brown never said Hendrix was ‘drowned in wine’ like these wine hoaxers claim.”
Jason is first claiming that “Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix” and then same-day he is claiming that the wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s and Cameron’s was the “bit too much Brown was talking about”. Of course, as stated earlier — the autopsy revealed a blood alcohol content of .005%, meaning that any wine that Jimi drank at either of those two places was long digested and gone — meaning there is no way Dr. Brown could be referencing wine that may have been drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s. Can’t have it both ways.
Now we get this, as a result of Jason tripping over his own tongue & getting exposed doing so……………..
“JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 8:15 pm
Doctor Bob Brown made his comment almost 40 years after Jimi’s death. Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.
Teare found that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml, enough to fail a breathalyzer test.
Doctor Bob Brown said Hendrix had “a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. That was the ‘bit’ he was referring to.”
Yes indeed, when Jason uses the word “moron”, he sure does give an exact description of himself. Just how far did Jason have to dig into his own ass to pull out this self-decreed fabrication (we do know that it took him over a week). No need for Jason to tell us what he is, as we already know & can easily illustrate it. Brown NEVER cited the autopsy report in any of his statements, anywhere, at any time.
Jason talks about “reading comprehension”, but does Jason even read his own lies? Apparently not, and it appears that Jason needs to have all three of those lies put into braille and shoved up his ass for Jason to comprehend that he can’t have it all three ways.
First we get “Brown saw no wine”, then next we get “the wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s and Cameron’s was the “bit too much Brown was talking about””, then when neither of the first two work & the contradiction gets exposed, we get “Brown was citing the autopsy report as being the bit too much to drink”.
Very sloppy liar that can’t get his lies in order regarding Dr. Brown.
And Jason’s lies don’t answer what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink upon Dr. Brown sighting Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots.
And once again, Jason can’t answer that the hospital report stated the treatment time of 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Plus Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi “couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid” & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs — debunking the claim that “no work was done”, as these lying-denying pigbreeders keep regurgitating.
Troll keeps posting the same post over and over again. Readers are laughing again.
“JASON says:
October 25, 2019 at 3:56 pm
Troll keeps posting the same post over and over again. Readers are laughing again.”
Readers are laughing, alright — but it’s Jason being laughed at & his desperation with his lies getting exposed.
Flyswatter: I think we can both agree Jason is pretty much finished at this point…His last post obviously represents him losing the debate…
I presented a highly accurate overview of the wine Jimi drank that night and its relationship to the forensic evidence and Jason answered with one of his more profound examples of self-indicting idiocy…My overview is highly accurate and backed by the facts I presented in it…Jason gave the moronic reply “So you were there that night incognito and keeping tabs on Jimi’s drinking”…Jason is obviously as stupid as he is crazy…We have a good idea of what Jimi was doing because his activities on that last evening were closely scrutinized…But Jason ignores the obvious…He ignores that my whole overview was based on the 5mg blood alcohol content at autopsy…That is the ruling determiner that Jason pretends he can get around and ignore…What an asshole to think he could get away with that…Jason is trash-talking and using that idiot level dodge to get around answering that we know my overview is accurate because Jimi only had a 5mg blood alcohol content at autopsy…So that proves Jimi didn’t have that much to drink and it also proves Dr Teare’s 100mg estimate was impossible…But the biggest proof is Jason’s dishonest inability to answer it…It is kind of dumb – or crazy, take your pick – for Jason to mock me and call me a clown etc but then be so publicly unable to answer plainly spelled-out evidence…The 5mg blood alcohol content is what “kept tabs” on Jimi’s drinking that night and Jason is incredibly dumb to think he’s getting away with not answering it so stupidly like he does here…
Jason does the same thing in his response to my proving Teare knew about the wine…Teare had to have known about the wine if he entered an estimated 100mg blood alcohol content…It is obvious Teare was referring to Dr Thurston’s stomach full of wine as well as Siefert’s witnessing Jimi covered in wine in that assumption…Jason made no attempt to answer this and simply said I had mental issues…So once again, what Jason is really telling us is he can’t give any credible response to the hard evidence he calls for but then trolls when shown…
Jason then idiotically resorts to another one of his feeble-minded semantic arguments where he tries to stupidly rip a word out of context in order to switch the subject away from the evidence he can’t answer…When I said Teare could not “know” about wine that was removed 3 days earlier at St Mary’s of course I meant he couldn’t have seen it in person…This trolling asshole Jason knows that, he’s just throwing another one of his scummy distractions in to the discussion to escape having to admit he got demolished above and couldn’t answer it…In the meantime Jason still hasn’t answered the evidence that Teare knew about the wine…Trying to desperately rip things out of context and cite quotes that have nothing to do with what we are talking about doesn’t relieve Jason from answering the evidence I posted in my last post…So despite these idiotic self-destructions of credibility by Jason we are still waiting for him to give a credible answer to Teare obviously being aware of the wine by referencing it in his 100mg estimate…The only thing he can be referring to is the same wine Dr Thurston spoke of as well as Siefert…
I think Jason is a nut who followed me here from a Kennedy Assassination website…In other words he’s a troll with a trolling agenda and not a genuine poster…
Yes, Buster….it is clear that these two lying-denying pigbreeders (Jason, and his piglet twin Sister Ivana Sow) are such lovers and makers of lies, that they can’t even see just how STUPID they make themselves look every time they post.
But let them continue, by all means, as I always welcome a good laugh, and that is really all these Two-Thirds of the Three Stooges are providing.
Produce some evidence of your phony “wine removal” by Fraud Bannister.
Oh wait…you can’t since it doesn’t exist.
“JASON says:
October 25, 2019 at 4:26 pm
Produce some evidence of your phony “wine removal” by Fraud Bannister.
Oh wait…you can’t since it doesn’t exist.”
Already been done, and it only “doesn’t exist” in Jason’s make believe world of leprechauns and unicorns.
The hospital report stated the treatment time of 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Plus Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi “couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid” & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs — debunking the claim that “no work was done”
BUSTER says: Flyswatter: I think we can both agree Jason is pretty much finished at this point…His last post obviously represents him losing the debate…
JASON says: The only one finished is you, who has no evidence and continuously embarrasses yourself in each post.
BUSTER says: I presented a highly accurate overview of the wine Jimi drank that night and its relationship to the forensic evidence and Jason answered with one of his more profound examples of self-indicting idiocy…My overview is highly accurate and backed by the facts I presented in it…Jason gave the moronic reply “So you were there that night incognito and keeping tabs on Jimi’s drinking”…Jason is obviously as stupid as he is crazy…We have a good idea of what Jimi was doing because his activities on that last evening were closely scrutinized…But Jason ignores the obvious…He ignores that my whole overview was based on the 5mg blood alcohol content at autopsy…That is the ruling determiner that Jason pretends he can get around and ignore…What an asshole to think he could get away with that…Jason is trash-talking and using that idiot level dodge to get around answering that we know my overview is accurate because Jimi only had a 5mg blood alcohol content at autopsy…So that proves Jimi didn’t have that much to drink and it also proves Dr Teare’s 100mg estimate was impossible…But the biggest proof is Jason’s dishonest inability to answer it…It is kind of dumb – or crazy, take your pick – for Jason to mock me and call me a clown etc but then be so publicly unable to answer plainly spelled-out evidence…The 5mg blood alcohol content is what “kept tabs” on Jimi’s drinking that night and Jason is incredibly dumb to think he’s getting away with not answering it so stupidly like he does here…
JASON says: You presented a turd believing it’s a gold bar.
You were inventing a phony story in your crazy head. That deserves a proper ridiculous response.
And you’re doing it again here with no evidence.
All the readers including myself laugh at you. You have no clue what you are talking about but write in an “authoritative manner” pretending that you do. That’s why everybody laughs at you. it’s pure comedy gold!
The evidence is already documented against you and you make up bogus stories trying to discredit it.
BUSTER says: Jason does the same thing in his response to my proving Teare knew about the wine…Teare had to have known about the wine if he entered an estimated 100mg blood alcohol content…It is obvious Teare was referring to Dr Thurston’s stomach full of wine as well as Siefert’s witnessing Jimi covered in wine in that assumption…Jason made no attempt to answer this and simply said I had mental issues…So once again, what Jason is really telling us is he can’t give any credible response to the hard evidence he calls for but then trolls when shown…
BUSTER says: October 11, 2019
Dr Teare had no way of knowing about the wine because it was removed and disposed of 3 days earlier at the hospital.
JASON says You already said Teare didn’t know about the wine. More trolling and changing your phony stories again.
You cant talk your way out of your lies. They are posted for all to see.
BUSTER says: Jason then idiotically resorts to another one of his feeble-minded semantic arguments where he tries to stupidly rip a word out of context in order to switch the subject away from the evidence he can’t answer…When I said Teare could not “know” about wine that was removed 3 days earlier at St Mary’s of course I meant he couldn’t have seen it in person…This trolling asshole Jason knows that, he’s just throwing another one of his scummy distractions in to the discussion to escape having to admit he got demolished above and couldn’t answer it…In the meantime Jason still hasn’t answered the evidence that Teare knew about the wine…Trying to desperately rip things out of context and cite quotes that have nothing to do with what we are talking about doesn’t relieve Jason from answering the evidence I posted in my last post…So despite these idiotic self-destructions of credibility by Jason we are still waiting for him to give a credible answer to Teare obviously being aware of the wine by referencing it in his 100mg estimate…The only thing he can be referring to is the same wine Dr Thurston spoke of as well as Siefert…
JASON says: These are your lying words coming back to haunt you before Halloween. You can’t weasel out of your lies Buster.
Teare did an autopsy and found no evidence of massive wine. I’ve already stated this many times before. So in return, you change your story like you did or claim a “cover up” to keep your scam going. You are a fraud and all the readers know your phony game.
Buster says: I think Jason is a nut who followed me here from a Kennedy Assassination website…In other words he’s a troll with a trolling agenda and not a genuine poster.
JASON says: The only nut here is you.
This is another lie in a feeble attempt to discredit my character. You are a hoaxer who got caught and you have no way out, so you resort to this nonsense making up stuff in your crazy head..
I think I know who this piece of shit is…There’s no point in responding to him since it is obvious that all he is going to do is troll in response to good arguments he can’t credibly answer…
Jason is done because I made a credible overview of the wine that Jimi drank that evening and attached it to the blood alcohol content forensics…All Jason could respond with is the high school kid-like trolling you see above…That overview proved that Jimi did not drink that much because he ended up with only a 5mg blood alcohol content when he died at 5:30am…This disproves Teare’s 100mg blood alcohol content at the time of pill ingestion estimate…
Jason is a liar who posts deliberately misleading things…He knows I was saying Teare did not witness the wine directly because it was disposed of 3 days earlier at St Mary’s…But Teare was aware of that wine at the autopsy because he made a special estimate of a 100mg blood alcohol content at the time Jimi took the pills…Jason is using silly trolling games and obnoxious semantic contrivances to avoid directly answering that Teare had to know about the wine if he estimated that 100mg blood alcohol content whose source could only be that wine…Instead of honestly answering this Jason veers off in to boy’s trolling games…
It is quite obvious that there is a recording of the communication between the emergency room doctors and Dr Teare that is missing here…Dr Teare obviously recognized the wine with that 100mg estimate so knowledge of that wine had to come from somewhere…We are obviously missing critical documentation of why Dr Teare assumed there was wine involved to the degree of 100mgs…You can see this refutes Jason’s idiotic claim that there was no wine because Dr Teare just recognized 100mgs worth…Jason knows this shoots down his claim that there was no wine so he turns up the boy’s trolling in response…
Jason is quite demented because after having it explained to him that the wine was removed at St Mary’s, so therefore Teare could not possibly see the internal wine at the autopsy, he once again repeats that Teare did not see any wine…
Jason is babbling but he’s visibly failing to answer the 5mg blood alcohol content…
Because Jason is a sick troll who isn’t being banned he is getting away with not answering what was Teare referring to with the 100mg blood alcohol content if there wasn’t any wine?…
BUSTER says: I think I know who this piece of shit is…There’s no point in responding to him since it is obvious that all he is going to do is troll in response to good arguments he can’t credibly answer…
Jason is done because I made a credible overview of the wine that Jimi drank that evening and attached it to the blood alcohol content forensics…All Jason could respond with is the high school kid-like trolling you see above…That overview proved that Jimi did not drink that much because he ended up with only a 5mg blood alcohol content when he died at 5:30am…This disproves Teare’s 100mg blood alcohol content at the time of pill ingestion estimate…
Jason is a liar who posts deliberately misleading things…He knows I was saying Teare did not witness the wine directly because it was disposed of 3 days earlier at St Mary’s…But Teare was aware of that wine at the autopsy because he made a special estimate of a 100mg blood alcohol content at the time Jimi took the pills…Jason is using silly trolling games and obnoxious semantic contrivances to avoid directly answering that Teare had to know about the wine if he estimated that 100mg blood alcohol content whose source could only be that wine…Instead of honestly answering this Jason veers off in to boy’s trolling games…
It is quite obvious that there is a recording of the communication between the emergency room doctors and Dr Teare that is missing here…Dr Teare obviously recognized the wine with that 100mg estimate so knowledge of that wine had to come from somewhere…We are obviously missing critical documentation of why Dr Teare assumed there was wine involved to the degree of 100mgs…You can see this refutes Jason’s idiotic claim that there was no wine because Dr Teare just recognized 100mgs worth…Jason knows this shoots down his claim that there was no wine so he turns up the boy’s trolling in response…
Jason is quite demented because after having it explained to him that the wine was removed at St Mary’s, so therefore Teare could not possibly see the internal wine at the autopsy, he once again repeats that Teare did not see any wine…
Jason is babbling but he’s visibly failing to answer the 5mg blood alcohol content…
Because Jason is a sick troll who isn’t being banned he is getting away with not answering what was Teare referring to with the 100mg blood alcohol content if there wasn’t any wine?…
JASON says: Still crying for me to be banned cuz you were exposed. Pathetic.
I’m not going to be banned for posting evidence. You were banned from all the Hendrix sites cuz you are a nut.
Same old bogus commentary and same old lies. You change your stories all the time and have no evidence. All the reads know you are a fraud. That’s your fault for lying.
Jimi drank wine that night and he wasn’t “drowned” as you claim.
He mixed 9 Vesparax with a “black bomber” and that killed him.
Your fake stories will never prove your phony claims.
Jason – you are clearly running from the points and not answering them…You couldn’t answer a single point I made in that last post…Your entry that Jimi died from barbiturates and a Black Bomber is idiotically over-simplified and doesn’t answer the correct information I posted…
You are publicly running from and unable to answer that Jimi had a 5mg blood alcohol content at death…That means whatever wine he drank that night was mostly digested by the time he died…You have failed to answer the point that Dr Teare’s 100mg estimate is impossible because we know Jimi took the pills no earlier than 3:30am and died at 5:30am so therefore he could not have digested 100mg of blood alcohol down to 5mg in only two hours…Plus we know Jimi did not have 100mg in him at 3am when he left the party because the people who described Jimi’s doings said he was perky and attentive and wasn’t drunk…Sorry but we have proof there that Teare made a false claim in his autopsy determinations…You can’t use Teare’s 100mg estimate because we have proven it was invalid…You can only use the 5mg blood alcohol content that was recorded…
So we are right back to your flagrant trolling evasion of this intelligent evidence…It looks like you saw something you knew you couldn’t answer there…You’re flagrantly evading answering that since Jimi only had a 5mg blood alcohol content you can’t pawn off the wine he drank earlier that evening as being the wine Dr’s Brown and Siefert witnessed…Plus you just flagrantly dodged answering how there could be no wine if Dr Teare estimated a 100mg blood alcohol content at Vesparax ingestion?…Teare had to base that estimate on something…Do you think maybe he based it on the full stomach of wine Dr Thurston said Jimi had?…Or maybe Jimi being covered in wine like Dr Siefert witnessed?…
You are bailing-out with idiotic overly general answers Jason and anyone can see the reason you are doing it is because you have been cornered and nailed by good points of evidence you know you can’t answer…I’ve already proven that Jimi only had 1800mg of barbiturate in him from 9 Vesparax…Barbiturate science shows that a person with no tolerance needs 2000mg to overdose…Jimi had a famous tolerance for drugs – including barbiturates…Plus I have proven Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 or 2 hours and that no one who took 1 to 6 more pills than Jimi died in less than 4 hours…Your answer is moronic and avoids all of the Intelligent science I posted…
Your answers are trollish and idiotic Jason and don’t come anywhere near to answering the level of argument I bring…You would quickly lose if you ever posted in any credible forum where your input was judged and you were held accountable for what you post…I’ve won this debate several times over…
The words of a trolling hoaxer who then lies saying this is out of context.
We all can see Buster’s clear story change and contradiction. Buster does this each and every time so he can claim he won a “debate”. After you refute his garbage he changes his story like he did here.
BUSTER says: October 11, 2019
Dr Teare had no way of knowing about the wine because it was removed and disposed of 3 days earlier at the hospital.
BUSTER says: October 25, 2019
In other words Teare was well aware of the wine and used it in his cause of death determination.
Buster says Teare had no way of knowing about the wine.
Then after I refute the troll, he clearly changes his story again claiming he did.
Buster can’t lie and weasel his way out of this. it’s here in black and white for all to read.
This ultimately proves that Buster is a troll and is not here for serious purposes. He along with his hoaxing troll “Flysquatter” are hell bent on suppressing the real evidence to perpetrate their phony hoax.
It could be they are trying to make money off this fake “Hendrix murder” hoax with dvd’s or books like other do so they keep this scam going.
Any rational thinking person can see they have zero evidence and they both keep pushing a scam.
“JASON says:
October 25, 2019 at 4:13 pm
The words of a trolling hoaxer who then lies saying this is out of context.”
Does Jason mean just like this?:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 3:20 am
“Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix. Brown only said he had a “bit too much to drink”.”
And next we have this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:04 pm
“We all know Hendrix was drinking wine during the evening at Harvey’s flat. He had more wine with Monika before he took a bath and wrote his final poem “The Story of Life”. Then he had more wine at Kameron’s party when he ingested a powerful amphetamine and ate a rice meal. This is the ‘bit ‘ too much Brown was talking about. Brown never said Hendrix was ‘drowned in wine’ like these wine hoaxers claim.”
Jason is first claiming that “Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix” and then same-day he is claiming that the wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s and Cameron’s was the “bit too much Brown was talking about”. Of course, as stated earlier — the autopsy revealed a blood alcohol content of .005%, meaning that any wine that Jimi drank at either of those two places was long digested and gone — meaning there is no way Dr. Brown could be referencing wine that may have been drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s. Can’t have it both ways.
Now we get this, as a result of Jason tripping over his own tongue & getting exposed doing so……………..
“JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 8:15 pm
Doctor Bob Brown made his comment almost 40 years after Jimi’s death. Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.
Teare found that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml, enough to fail a breathalyzer test.
Doctor Bob Brown said Hendrix had “a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. That was the ‘bit’ he was referring to.”
Yes indeed, when Jason uses the word “moron”, he sure does give an exact description of himself. Just how far did Jason have to dig into his own ass to pull out this self-decreed fabrication (we do know that it took him over a week). No need for Jason to tell us what he is, as we already know & can easily illustrate it. Brown NEVER cited the autopsy report in any of his statements, anywhere, at any time.
Jason talks about “reading comprehension”, but does Jason even read his own lies? Apparently not, and it appears that Jason needs to have all three of those lies put into braille and shoved up his ass for Jason to comprehend that he can’t have it all three ways.
First we get “Brown saw no wine”, then next we get “the wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s and Cameron’s was the “bit too much Brown was talking about””, then when neither of the first two work & the contradiction gets exposed, we get “Brown was citing the autopsy report as being the bit too much to drink”.
Very sloppy liar that can’t get his lies in order regarding Dr. Brown.
And Jason’s lies don’t answer what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink upon Dr. Brown sighting Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots.
And once again, Jason can’t answer that the hospital report stated the treatment time of 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Plus Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi “couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid” & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs — debunking the claim that “no work was done”, as these lying-denying pigbreeders keep regurgitating.
(Aloha compadres! Moving on here with Part 2 and it promises to be even better than Part One if you can believe it. Last time we got the background on this Bannister character who showed us to be the shady ex Doctor that he really is. Which is obviously why he was removed for malpractice and fraudulent conduct way back in 1992 when he started his bogus wine claims. His ridiculous phony wine claims prove him to be exactly the same guy who was struck off the medical register for fraud. Tin foil hatters don’t like hearing that about their idol cuz they want the truth about him to be suppressed to continue their hoax. Well, that’s too damn bad cuz the truth needs to be told and stating facts that he was convicted for 3 counts of fraud is telling it like it is and there is nothing wrong with it. People need to be informed about these people making serious claims and if they are legitimate. Well, this man has proven for decades that he isn’t. We read how he contradicted himself and his phony stories are ridiculous as he has refuted his own nonsense. Here in Part two, we will revisit more of ex Doctor Bannister’s lies and terrible contradictions that destroys his phony wine drowning claims.There is also a big surprise in store for the tin foil hat wine hoaxers that they sure won’t enjoy. But we start off with the absurdity of the tin foil hat wine drowning theory, and will see how asinine it is, and wonder how tin foil hat kooks can subscribe to a ludicrous theory. All ready? Let’s go!)
“Debunking Ex Doctor Bannister’s Phony Wine Myth”
Part Two
By Jason
When a story is too outlandish and sounds fishy it usually is. That’s what this “wine Hendrix murder hoax” is. It’s an incredible story that is too ridiculous to believe and that’s what wine hoaxers and Fraud Bannister presents us with.
A crazy mixed up farce with different plots, twists and turns, followed by many “maybe’s” and “probably’s”, debunked nonsense, made up phony stories, and assumptions that never happened. Then we get a “know it all” kook who really doesn’t really know his ass from a hole in the ground pretending to be a “forensic expert” with timeline that doesn’t add up.
Supposedly all this wine exists in this “massive wine drowning”, but for all those who have witnessed the actual Hendrix death scene, they have never seen any this of this wine when it only appears like magic for Fraud Bannister and his Merry Band of Wine Hoaxers. They tell us it’s there and we have to believe them. After they are forced to answer why there is no wine, we get all kinds of lame excuses and then their hoax is exposed for what it is. You can’t have a “wine drowning” when wine is not witnessed at the death scene. Wine hoaxers still can’t figure that one out.
Tin foil hat wine hoaxers appear to be a bit perturbed after they read Part One feeling Bannister looked like an ‘incompetent bumbling fool’. Well, that’s exactly how he looks to each and every person who has a clear rational thinking mind. So, even wine hoaxers appear to be having doubts of their “good doctor”. And who wouldn’t, with all the nonsense he has provided over the years. These are all the exact statements that Bannister is on the record claiming with all his inconsistencies, confusion, and contradictions over the years. So, if the wine hoaxers have a problem with that, then they should voice their displeasure with Bannister’s ineptness, not the messenger who is just stating the facts providing the information. Wine hoaxers don’t like when their phony sham is exposed for what it is. They only want to promote their phony talking points trying to portray Bannister as their “Knight in Shining Armor”.
Let’s take a minute and sit back to see how ridiculous this entire account from Bannister is. We are going to pretend that everything Bannister is saying is true just to get a better look at this situation.
Hendrix was certified to be dead on arrival and no wine hoaxer can argue against that. Les Perrin, Jimi’s public relations manager confirmed that to the media on 9/18/70. Every single media outlet all over the world reported that Hendrix was dead on arrival when he reached the hospital. Bannister was recorded as the official attending doctor of Hendrix who pronounced Hendrix dead. So, Bannister’s job was to inform the media of the condition of Hendrix since he was listed as the official attending doctor. That means Bannister was the doctor who officially stated that Hendrix was dead on arrival and it also means that he was responsible for having the media informed of the cause of Hendrix’s death which was an overdose of drugs. So, Bannister made it known that Hendrix was already dead on arrival but then over 20 years later he is claiming frantic 20-30 minute “life saving” procedures.
Since Bannister was responsible for having the media informed of the cause of Hendrix’s death, the statement read on 9/18/70 was that Hendrix died from an overdose of drugs. After that, all the media started reporting the cause of death. Fast forward to 21 years later, and ex Doctor Bannister is making wild claims of wine and “wine removal” procedures that strangely this man never mentioned in 1970 or has any official documentation to prove it did.
If we are to believe ex Doctor Bannister and take him at his word, then he would have to had worked extremely hard on Hendrix in the short time frame. Siefert hooked Jimi up to the monitor and it was flat lined, he pounded his heart twice as a formality and it was proven Hendrix was dead. That means Bannister would have taken over, already knowing Hendrix was dead, to start performing all these “procedures” in a short amount of time.
Some sources reported that Gerry Stickells identified Hendrix’s body straight up at High Noon. So, if Stickells identified Hendrix around 12 pm that means none of these “procedures” that ex Doctor Bannister and wine hoaxers claim now were ever performed back then. That falls right in line with Siefert’s and Dr. Brown’s testimony along with media reports from 9/18/70 and 9/19/70, where they stated Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival and then was shipped off to the morgue awaiting an autopsy. Now this would be accurate, since Hendrix was a John Doe when he arrived, nobody knew who he was until Gerry Stickells identified the body as Jimi Hendrix. So, the wait time now appears that it was for identification purposes only, not any “life saving procedures” as claimed by the fraudsters.
Ex Doctor Bannister is already on the record stating Hendrix already turned black inside his mouth and had no circulation going through his body. He said he was cold and blue and estimated he was dead for hours and all the signs of rigor mortis. Bannister would have had to observed the condition of Hendrix’s body after Siefert determined he was dead with the formality of hooking him up to the monitor. Ex Doctor Bannister stated that any attempt to resuscitate Hendrix was merely of formality, and that was it.
If we believe ex Doctor Bannister, that would mean he would have to had taken over the case. He would have witnessed Hendrix soaked in wine with it coming out of his nose and mouth as he claimed and then got to work. To put a wrinkle in the story, wine hoaxers claim a “hard plug of vomit” was in Hendrix’s throat preventing wine from being witnessed. But ex Doctor Bannister claimed he witnessed wine right off the bat. So, we already have a big contradiction in their phony case which we will discuss a little bit later.
So, to take the wine hoaxers account, that means Bannister quickly assembled his team of nurses and doctors to get to work on removing a “hard plug of vomit” from a man who was dead for hours, with black membranes in his mouth showing rigor mortis who was cold and blue having no circulation. Guess ex Doctor Bannister was all ready for his endeavor in his “life saving” attempt of Jimi Hendrix.
So, it’s not exactly clear just how long ex Doctor Bannister frantically worked on penetrating that “hard plug of vomit” with his trusty powerful equipment since theories vary from Hoaxer to Hoaxer. But to be safe, we will go with ten minutes on the dot. Ex Doctor Bannister was working extremely hard on penetrating the simple dry vomit in Hendrix’s throat which whine hoaxers claim turned to granite. One would think of Moe, Larry, and Curly of The Three Stooges using their power tools getting the job done. “Nyuck, Nyuck, Nyuck!”
So, after Bannister finally broke through that “hard plug of granite” (which was only dry vomit testified by ambulance men) “lodged” inside Hendrix’s throat, a boisterous jubilation broke out between ex Doctor Bannister and his medical team he assembled. They cheered and whooped it up, but that was short lived cuz then….and then….and then came the wine!!!
Yes, all that wine that was hidden beneath that “hard plug” of granite (only dry vomit that was testified by ambulance men) that took ten minutes to break through, (only simple vomit) burst open like a broken dam flooding from the mouth and lungs. The gallons of wine sprung to life gushing up like a geyser. Bannister declared “He has sprung a leak” as pandemonium broke out. But Ex Doctor Bannister kept his cool and got right to work sucking out wine with his small metal sucker that normally would take hours to remove a body full of wine.
Ex Doctor Bannister claimed there were 5 bottles worth of wine, so it’s not certain if he retrieved 5 empty wine bottles from a dumpster out back of the hospital, but he was certainly on task measuring the specific amounts of wine removed in some container that was a size of a wine bottle. Ex Doctor Bannister must have broken out in a huge sweat working hard on a man who’s already been declared dead for many hours. To his surprise, he collected 5 bottles of wine in a 20 minute time period.
So, ex Doctor Bannister with his small metal sucker managed in turbo speed mode to remove and entire body of wine in world record time which would normally take hours in just 20 minutes. Ex Doctor Bannister is definitely worthy of a Gold Medal for that unbelievable mind-blowing performance.
After Hendrix was bone dry from the “wine removal”, it’s not clear if ex Doctor Bannister took a well deserved break. Under these conditions, a doctor is required by law to document these two procedures that ex Doctor Bannister claimed he performed 21 years later. Surprisingly enough, no documentation ever existed of these “life saving procedures” that Bannister is required to document on Hendrix’s medical file. Why wouldn’t the “good doctor” document all this “hard work” he claimed he performed? Was he being a secret Good Samaritan wanting to be incognito until he made his “Triumphant Announcement” 21 years later?
To make matters worse, “the good doctor” looked at all his hard work of the 5 bottles of wine he extracted from Hendrix in record time, and decided to just “dump it all out” without the world knowing all this “wine” ever existed. “The Grandfather of Wine” didn’t even bother to save the evidence which was required for analysis as he nonchalantly just decided to “get rid of it” also not documenting any record of extracted fluids from a dead body.
So, when the media came calling and ex Doctor Bannister had to declare Hendrix’s cause of death, ex Doctor Bannister refused to let the world know of his “heroic heroism” of all the wine he witnessed and removed. He decided to let the world know instead that Hendrix died from a barbiturate overdose and let us believe that happened until he stepped forward into the limelight in 1992 on his white horse, as a white knight, telling the world of his heroic adventures. He says you need to believe all his stories that he has contradicted over the years with no proof or documentation ever existed. Then we have the morons of his fan club who laps up every word this man says as they all parrot the same nonsense.
So, there we have it folks, that’s the entire story of what these wine hoaxers want you to believe. This asinine and ridiculous myth they created out of fantasy as they demand you believe or else you are a denier or other garbage names they attack you with. Anybody with an ounce of common sense wouldn’t believe this shit and that is the exact account of their phony claims. Yes, there was some parody involved for a humorous effect but the crux of their fantasy was all there and it’s total nonsense for morons.
We had some fun at the wine hoaxers expense but what isn’t a laughing matter is how ex Doctor Bannister conducted himself if we are really to believe what he is telling us. Bannister showed his complete negligence, ineptness, and lack of common sense as a doctor. It’s very easy to see why he was removed for fraudulent conduct if what he says happened it true.
Bannister violated his oath as a doctor which he is supposed to conduct himself in a professional and proper manner. He told us of his procedures he performed in 1992, but has no evidence or documentation of what he claimed he did in 1970. What ex Doctor Bannister is admitting to is against the law. He “performed work” on a dead body without proper documentation which is illegal. To make matters even worse, he claimed Hendrix was soaked in gallons of wine with it gushing out of him. Something so extraordinary he has never seen before. So, he doesn’t even bother to document his findings of what he witnessed or call the authorities of something so unusual? What’s really criminal is that he claimed to have extracted 5 bottles worth of wine from inside Jimi Hendrix’s dead body. This is bodily fluids from inside a man that needs to be documented and preserved for evidence and analysis. That wine needed to be forensically analyzed to determine the cause of Jimi’s death. It needed to be passed on to Teare and most likely investigated of a possible “Hendrix murder” (which there never was) . But what does ex Doctor Bannister do? He just “dumps it all out”, Fraud Bannister dumps out 5 bottles of bodily fluids like it’s no big deal, destroying fluids he extracted from a dead body. This is illegal and has no documentation either. If he took the time to measure 5 bottles worth of wine from inside Jimi Hendrix, why didn’t he ever document this on record?
Then when it came time for him to reveal the cause of death to the media before the inquest started, he completely doesn’t even mention wine to anybody, and gives a different account of a drug overdose. That makes no sense since he claimed he extracted 5 bottles of wine in an alcohol related death. But then he turns around and gives an alternate account of a death stating an overdose drugs? Makes absolutely no sense at all.
21 years later he finally decides to reveal “the real cause” of Jimi’s death after he read Electric Gypsy? He finally decided it was time to let the world know of his ‘heroic efforts”? For 21 years he let Jimi’s family, friends, fans believe an account that didn’t happen while he kept it all to himself?
He didn’t bother to document anything giving a different account of a drug overdose and violated everything a doctor is supposed to conduct himself in a proper manner. This man is no “hero” he has revealed himself to be a fraud as he tells his account decades later. If he thought his phony account makes him look heroic, this man is delusional just like the clowns who support him.
We had a perfect opportunity to look at the perspective the of the wine hoaxers and Ex Doctor Bannister’s vantage point. It is absolutely ridiculous which is why sane people laugh it off as a joke. Can you believe a doctor operating in this fashion behaving illegally? Don’t forget about all the wine and plug of vomit nonsense being performed on a dead corpse. What do they expect would happen?
It’s clear that ex Doctor Bannister made this whole thing up in 1992 cuz there is nothing on record of what he claims happened in 1992. Also, no other doctor has ever confirmed these “procedures” ever took place. We know Siefert and Brown said “no revival was possible” and “nothing more was done” for Hendrix. So, who are these other two imaginary doctors ex Doctor Bannister speaks of? Bannister has zero documents to prove his claims or has any doctor to corroborate what he claims. His claims are phony and all contradict each other like these next few phony claims.
“There was red wine all over him, I think that he was naked but he had something around him, whether it was a towel or a jumper around his neck. That was saturated in red wine. His hair was matted.”- Ex Doctor Bannister
“The amount of wine that was over him was just extraordinary. Not only was it saturated right through his hair and shirt but his lungs and stomach were absolutely full of wine. I have never seen so much wine.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
So, in 1993 ex Doctor Bannister states that Hendrix was “naked” with a jumper that was saturated in wine. That account was false since Reginal Jones and John Saua, the ambulance men, stated Hendrix was fully clothed and covered in vomit. Bannister was discredited with this account proving his statement to be a lie.
Then over a decade later, Bannister gives another interview changing his story right when Tappy Wright’s fraudulent book came out. Here Bannister changes his story to Hendrix wearing a shirt. He said he was “naked” way back in 1993. Did Bannister read the testimony of the ambulance men and change his story that Hendrix was wearing a shirt to sound credible after he wasn’t in 1993? It’s obvious that Bannister changes his stories each time and is not credible.
“There was red wine all over him, I think that he was naked but he had something around him, whether it was a towel or a jumper around his neck. That was saturated in red wine. His hair was matted.”- Ex Doctor Bannister 1993
“The amount of wine that was over him was just extraordinary. Not only was it saturated right through his hair and shirt but his lungs and stomach were absolutely full of wine. I have never seen so much wine. – Ex Doctor Bannister
So, in 1993 ex Doctor Bannister states that Hendrix was “naked” with a jumper that was saturated in wine. That account was false since Reginal Jones and John Saua, the ambulance men, stated Hendrix was fully clothed and covered in vomit. Bannister was discredited with this account proving his statement to be a lie.
Then over a decade later, Bannister gives another interview changing his story right when Tappy Wright’s fraudulent book came out. Here Bannister changes his story to Hendrix wearing a shirt. He said he was “naked” way back in 1993. Did Bannister read the testimony of the ambulance men and change his story that Hendrix was wearing a shirt to sound credible after he wasn’t in 1993? It’s obvious that Bannister changes his stories each time and is not credible.
Ex Doctor Bannister gave his decades later recollections of what he claims he witnessed on 9/18/70. “The Grandfather of Wine” says Jimi was fully saturated in wine which with the description he gives would be extremely hard to miss.
His phony recollections are discredited right off the bat as both ambulance men witnessed an entirely different account. John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed all this wine saturated on Jimi Hendrix. Notice ex Doctor Bannister never mentions anything about vomit on Hendrix, it’s only pure wine. The ambulance men witnessed vomit on Hendrix and never did see pure wine. We know that from their detailed and graphic testimony of the vomit. If there was wine visible they definitely would have graphically described wine as well. But neither man did witness it and neither did Officer Ian Smith. Jimi Hendrix must be a “magic wine quick change artist ” just for old ex Doctor Bannister.
Wine hoaxers are ignorant in their own right. They play up this elaborate and extravagant “waterboarding wine murder drowning scene” and expect you to believe it. When ambulance men, police men, coroner’s officers witnessed the flat and viewed no scene of this nature we get all the bogus excuses on “why” they couldn’t see the wine. This is the ultimate WTF moment right there. So, you mean to tell us this huge extravagant “wineboarding” scene that they play up wouldn’t be witnessed by professionals who viewed the flat? They need to pathetically claim “super absorbent bedding” and “being too busy” to save Jimi (who was already long dead) would prevent them from witnessing all this massive wine? That’s why their claim is a fraud. If ex Doctor Bannister was able to witness all this wine he claimed he seen on Jimi, then both ambulance men would have as well when they were checking him out, using the aspirator, transporting him, tending to him in the ambulance, and bringing him in the hospital. There would be no way they would have missed a “wine soaked Jimi” as ex Doctor Bannister claimed.
That’s why wine hoaxers lose their phony claim. Wine was never witnessed at the flat. Buster the clown said pure wine was spilled all over the bed. Then when he is forced to answer for why wine was never witnessed he makes up a lame excuse that “super absorbent bedding” soaked up the wine and only left vomit. Totally ridiculous, but what the moron doesn’t understand is that red wine stains and still would be visible. And the forensic analysis done on the blankets and Jimi’s vomit were conducted to determine which type of drugs he took. Massive wine never showed up at all which was never in play. So, they lose their fake claim on just the forensic analysis.
But you just read ex Doctor Bannister’s accounts of this massive wine soaked Jimi. Wine hoaxers claim Dr. Siefert claimed a wine soaked Jimi as well. So, they are claiming wine decades later but when it counted on 9/18/70 what did these doctors officially state? They declared an overdose of drugs. A complete opposite report of what they claimed decades later.
Are we as intelligent people to believe these doctors would see all this wine and officially state a different cause of death? Are we as intelligent people to believe Fraud Bannister who claimed a frantic “wine removal” would never document or disclose to the media he performed this on Jimi? Are we to believe these “procedures” all would be kept under wraps until Fraud Bannister decided to claim it really happens in of January of 1992? They expect us to believe it happened in 1992 to the present but for some odd reason decided to list a different cause of death and not say anything then about what they are now claiming.
Sorry, that’s now how life works. Everything they are claiming now are after the fact claims when they did the opposite in 1970. People aren’t stupid enough to be suckered into this nonsense. If there was a “wine drowning in 1970 then they would have documented it, had evidence of wine, and reported it to be a wine related death. They certainly wouldn’t not bother to document, preserve evidence, and give an entirely different cause of death than what they witnessed. That’s now we know this is all a hoax. These are all after the fact claims and contradict what really happened in 1970 and is totally obvious.
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse.” – ex Doctor Bannister
“The body was cold, there were no signs of circulation and my overall impression was he’d been dead for several hours.” – ex Doctor Bannister
Bannister again states in more interviews that Hendrix was already dead for hours but then claims he worked on him for half an hour. Ex Doctor Bannister claimed in 2009 that he worked hard on Jimi to “save him”. Bannister clearly has lost his mind saying this total nonsense when he has said Jimi was dead for hours years before.
What do these wine hoaxers and Fraud Bannister hope to accomplish by claiming “treatments” were done on a man who was dead for hours? Do they think after all the “wine” was removed Jimi would sit up and start singing “Hey Joe”?
Ex Doctor Bannister shows us he is a crackpot trying to claim he worked hard on a cold dead blue body with black membranes that was dead for hours. He is lucky the orderlies with the straight jacket didn’t come to take him away. Wine hoaxers believe this nonsense as well since they are as crazy in the head and mentally off as well.
Ex Doctor Bannister says Hendrix was dead for several hours and then he is telling us he worked hard to “save him” in a frantic 30 minute resuscitation attempt. Then he has enough nerve to say that nothing worked. What the hell did he expect? Making asinine claims like this makes this man just look like he’s lost his mind, and it’s why people do not believe a word he says.
Under no circumstances would a doctor be doing extensive work on a corpse that was already declared dead on arrival. And then not document his work or preserve evidence claiming he dumped it out? And nobody else can corroborate his stories? That’s why this whole thing is a hoax and Bannister was convicted for fraud.
It’s like a guy who’s claimed he captured Big Foot. He says “I caught him” then young say “Ok great, where is he?” then the guy replies “”Oh he got away, but he was in the cage”
Just like ex Doctor Bannister says with his wine claims, “I’ve seen and removed all this massive wine in Jimi Hendrix.” and someone asks him “Where is all the wine you removed?” then Bannister says “Oh, I dumped it all out.” the person asks “No documentation either?”, Bannister would say, “No, no none of that either, but I witnessed it I tell you!”
Yeah, just like with the Big Foot claim folks, this is nothing but a hoax.
“Jimi was rushed into the resuscitation room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else as he was dead. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes, he was dead.”-Dr. Martin Siefert
Doctor Siefert said Hendrix was already dead and was worked on for just a few minutes. He said there was “no point in doing anything else as he was dead”. Which is exactly the point I’ve made all along. It makes no sense to work on a cold and blue dead man for a half hour like Bannister claims. Siefert is credible with his statement and Bannister is proving he is a liar or a man who doesn’t have his mental faculties in order.
Siefert refutes ex Doctor Bannister’s nonsense and don’t forget Dr. Bob Brown who refuted Bannister as well stating “no revival was possible”. That means no work was done besides the basic formality. Moronic wine hoaxers can’t read or understand testimony that refutes their nonsense, so they dig in harder doubling down on their bullshit, while everybody else sits back and laughs even harder at their stupidity. These people belong in a rubber room mumbling their Sharon Lawrence quotes and phony wine claims.
“I would have thought there was half a bottle of wine in his hair.”-Ex Doctor Bannister
So, ex Doctor Bannister can tell the amount of wine in his hair by just looking at it? Did he wring out Hendrix’s hair to get half a bottle? He can estimate it at a half bottle with his x ray vision that measures dried liquid in hair? Like the 5 bottles of wine he claimed he removed from inside Jimi and then just “dumped it out”? This phony claim of wine in the hair is totally absurd. It’s just another reason why people do not take this fool seriously and only kooks and weirdos with mental issues thinks this sounds logical.
“Hendrix did not have an obstruction of the airways. What he had, was that he had a drowning of the airways.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
“His airway was completely blocked all the way down, his tongue had fallen back, he was flat on his back you see.” – Reginal Jones
Ex Doctor Bannister has made a severe contradiction for the wine hoaxers and for his own phony wine claim. See if you can spot it first. Take a few seconds to read both quotes a couple of times.
As we know from our expert witness Reginal Jones, in the bottom quote he witnessed Hendrix with vomit blocking his airway all the way down with dry vomit. Wine hoaxers tried to claim the dry vomit was a “hard plug” to continue their wine hoax.
But look what their pal ex Doctor Bannister says in the top quote. Bannister is claiming Hendrix did not have an obstruction of the airway. Ex Doctor Bannister is saying that no dry vomit was blocking Hendrix’s airways as an obstruction.
Well, we know that’s a lie cuz we have two men who witnessed Hendrix dead before he did and they saw dry vomit all the way down obstructing his airways. John Saua used an aspirator on Hendrix sucking out dry vomit and he knows what he witnessed as he worked on Hendrix before getting him to the hospital. Reginal Jones witnessed the same as well as he tended to Jimi. It’s important to note that both John Saua and Reginal Jones both gave separate testimonies. They had no idea that they would be interviewed about the events of that morning. Everything that they described was almost identical to each other so you know they are credible witnesses. Both men never witnessed any wine or alcohol on Jimi. But what is most important here is that they both witnessed dry vomit blocking Jimi’s airway and ex Doctor Bannister is giving a different version.
Ex Doctor Bannister is claiming that Hendrix had a drowning of the airway which means he is stating that no vomit would be in play since he is claiming that Hendrix was drowned in wine .
That’s a problem for Ex Doctor Bannister cuz two men who saw Hendrix dead before he did refute him by witnessing his airways blocked with vomit. Also, Officer Ian Smith witnessed a dead Hendrix and knew it was a routine drug overdose. He said he “received a lot of calls like that in those days”. He certainly never came to a “wine drowning scene”. Smith said nothing about Jimi being drowned nor did Jones or Saua. Jones told Kathy Etchingham that Hendrix choked on his own vomit. So, Fraud Bannister got some explaining to do.
So, by ex Doctor Bannister’s phony claim he is immediately refuted by 3 men who witnessed Hendrix dead first. They all testified Hendrix had vomit blocking his airway. Ex Doctor Bannister is also refuted by Doctor Bob Brown who said Jimi died of inhalation of vomit. And refuted by both Dr Teare and Dr. Thurston who declared an inhalation of vomit as the official cause of death. What’s hilarious is that old Bannister refutes himself when stated Jimi died of a drug overdose in 1970 in the official hospital statement. So, it’s very clear Fraud Bannister lied and changed his story from what he declared in 1970 and what everybody else witnessed and confirmed. But we ain’t done yet.
With this revelation of Bannister stating that Jimi did not have an “obstruction of the airway but only a drowning” is that ex Doctor Bannister is refuting the phony claim of Buster the clown of a “hard plug of vomit”. You reading that Buster? Your own pal refutes your phony claim. Looks like you picked the wrong phony claim to use.
“A hard plug of vomit” is definitely an obstruction of the airway and ex Doctor Bannister is telling us that never existed in his statement. So,, Buster the clown can no longer claim a “hard plug of vomit” since Bannister says it doesn’t exist. Hilarious.
Bannister also is telling us that no dry vomit ever existed either since it was a drowning and no vomit obstructing Hendrix. But 3 other men refute Bannister’s claim. I will go into more detail about this in Parts 3 and 4.
So, Ex Doctor Bannister makes as mortal error here with his phony wine drowning claim with a “drowning of the airway”. He specifically stated there was no “obstruction”. With that revelation, Bannister debunks the phony “hard plug of vomit” claim for good since that is definitely an “obstruction”. Bannister says it never existed. So, whenever you see Buster the clown trying to use the phony “hard plug of vomit” claim you can just tell him “Bannister says it doesn’t exist”. Will be hilarious to watch the wine troll Buster the clown try to weasel out of that. We can expect a lame excuse and word play games from that joker.
But most importantly, Ex Doctor Bannister shows and proves himself to be a fraud since 3 men refute his phony claim who saw Hendrix dead before he did and the official verdict refutes him as well. With Bannister’s claim that would mean Hendrix arrived at the hospital with wine spilling out of his mouth and we all know that never happened.
So, Ex Doctor Bannister destroys himself here in Part 2 by demolishing his own phony claim proving it to be a hoax and the ridiculous “hard plug of vomit” is blown apart by “The Godfather of Wine” for his own loyal wine hoaxers. Now that’s hilarious!
We also saw how ridiculous the wine Hoaxer claim is and saw how Bannister completely has no idea what he’s talking about. We saw the plug of vomit go up in flames and how all these claims are after the fact when in 1970 their behavior was the complete opposite.
What more can ex Doctor Bannister do to destroy his own claims? He can do plenty more damage with all the nonsense he has provided us. This hoax has already been demolished once again but Parts 3 and 4 will be plenty more explosive then Part 2. Until then, watch out for the hoaxers crying on their super absorbent pillow cases.
TRANSLATED: Jason still can’t answer what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink upon Dr. Brown sighting Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots?
And once again, Jason can’t answer that the hospital report stated the treatment time of 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Plus Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi “couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid” & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs — debunking the claim that “no work was done”.
Just more blather consisting of nothing but self-decreed fabrications that Jason pulls out of his ass.
FLYSWATTER says: TRANSLATED: Jason still can’t answer what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink upon Dr. Brown sighting Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots?
And once again, Jason can’t answer that the hospital report stated the treatment time of 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Plus Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi “couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid” & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs — debunking the claim that “no work was done”.
Just more blather consisting of nothing but self-decreed fabrications that Jason pulls out of his ass.
JASON says: Says the clown who claims a phony “murder” and lives in delusion.
Same old copy and paste troll post
Doctor Bob Brown made his comment almost 40 years after Jimi’s death. Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.
Teare found that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml, enough to fail a breathalyzer test.
Doctor Bob Brown said Hendrix had “a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. That was the ‘bit’ he was referring to.
“JASON says: Says the clown who claims a phony “murder” and lives in delusion.
Same old copy and paste troll post
Doctor Bob Brown made his comment almost 40 years after Jimi’s death. Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.
Teare found that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml, enough to fail a breathalyzer test.
Doctor Bob Brown said Hendrix had “a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. That was the ‘bit’ he was referring to.”
Pot meet kettle…………..we are both colored BLACK.
Copy and paste job of the third self-decreed fabrication that Jason picked out of his ass with his toothbrush. Jason can’t produce any reference source to back his claim of Dr. Brown citing the autopsy data, because it doesn’t exist & Dr. Brown was referring to what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at the hospital.
So Jason still can’t answer the question of what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink, if there was “no wine”, as Jason keeps self-decreeing.
How can Jason keep claiming “no wine” and then turn around and state “Teare found that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml” to try to back his lie about Dr. Brown citing the autopsy? Total contradiction by the lying-denying pig-breeder that just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
And no, that 100mg wasn’t from any wine that Jimi may have drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s, as Teare’s autopsy report stated Jimi’s BAC was .005%, and Teare’s statement of 100mg was an ESTIMATE of BAC at the time of Vesperax ingestion.
And of course, still no answer to:
The hospital report stated the treatment time of 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Plus Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi “couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid” & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs — debunking the claim that “no work was done”.
In case any member of the public wanders in and takes Jason seriously they should know he is a nut who followed me over from Kennedy assassination websites and decided to troll me here on my own Hendrix turf…I think he might be Casey LeDoux from the “REOPENKENNEDYCASE.COM” troll farm…Every time Jason loses an argument with us he doubles down and re-posts his trolling even harder, which is what you are seeing with his last overly-long trolling screed that is mostly trash-talk designed to BS around the evidence Jimi was murdered…There’s more than one outright lie or mistruth in Jason’s latest offering…Trolls like Jason usually give themselves away by the volume of tent preacher bluster they need to pad their dishonesty with…There are a lot of Hendrix historians who refuse to believe Jimi was murdered and Jason has gone over to their websites and extracted their denials and made them in to a false essay…
The first part of Jason’s denial script above tries to make Dr Bannister more involved and responsible than he actually was…Jason’s cherry-picking and false spin is designed to convince you that Dr Siefert was the credible doctor who saw Jimi was dead and pounded on his chest a few times and walked away, and that Dr Bannister was a wild cowboy who then decided to do crazy Frankenstein experiments on what he knew was a dead body…That contention is, of course, completely false and solely built on Jason’s deliberate lies that he tries to sell you with conviction…The real truth is Dr Siefert stayed right along side Bannister for the full half hour treatment period…Bannister made no reckless decision to treat a dead body and what really happened, and the reasons for it, is nowhere close to the false version Jason concocts for trolling purposes…Jason is trying to place all the blame on Bannister so he can dismiss him and therefore conveniently dismiss all the evidence through him…But he is doing so by radically misrepresenting the truth and how things really happened…
Jason pretends to understand emergency room procedures but if he really understood the procedures he pretends to lecture us over he would realize no emergency room doctor would leave a patient with fluid in their lungs…If a patient arrives with their lungs and stomach full of fluid the doctors remove it in order to establish breathing…Jason is stupid because any doctor would tell you patients in cardiac arrest have been brought back before by the very procedures Dr’s Siefert and Bannister performed on Jimi so his trolling attempt to revise what happened and portray Bannister’s actions as abnormal and illegal is just silly nonsense coming from an asshole who is thinking of any way to troll this subject…The simple truth is the doctors received a person with an abnormal amount of wine flooding his lungs and stomach and did what they had to do to in order to try and save him…If Jason really understood emergency room procedures he would realize no doctor could leave a patient with that fluid unremoved because they would be criticized for it later for not doing the necessary treatment that was needed…Jason is lying when he says Siefert walked off and left Bannister to do that procedure alone…Scotland Yard avoided interviewing the nurses because they knew they would confirm all this…Jason uncredibly, stupidly ignores that Siefert was the head registrar and was therefore in charge and responsible and could not walk away from the less than a year intern Bannister…(STUPID)…
Jason is lying when he says Bannister removed the vomit…I spoke to Bannister and he told me Siefert had gotten there first and removed the plug of vomit…By the time Bannister arrived the wine was visible in the throat and was no longer blocked…
Jason stupidly ignores that 5 bottles of wine would be about what you could pour in to somebody…The amount of wine is evidence of how it got there and why…Jason also stupidly ignores that 20 minutes is about the time it would take to remove that amount of wine using the hospital equipment Siefert and Bannister used…
The wine was recorded in the record as “asphyxiated on vomit”…Jason ignores that as Head Registrar Siefert would be responsible for that determination…Siefert happens to be the doctor who also held back on his witnessing of the internal wine…
The wine should not have been poured down the drain at St Mary’s but it was because the doctors thought it was a drug overdose choking on vomit case…Jason is contemptuously ignoring that the nurses could have confirmed the wine – which is why Scotland Yard avoided them..I find it comical to see a troll like Jason thinking he is getting away with ignoring this…
Dr Bannister told me the media never came to him personally and he never spoke to them…The rest is explained by a Hospital taking a legal defense and not volunteering anything in the case of the death of a major world celebrity…
Jason is lying when he says Bannister kept it all to himself for 21 years…Bannister pointed me to a person who he told the same story to in the 1970’s…
Jason tries to use his usual idiotic word games to discredit Bannister, however Bannister permanently cleared the hurdle of credibility when he identified Monika’s wine-soaked scarf around Jimi’s neck…Since Jimi was photographed wearing that scarf that afternoon it proves the only way Bannister could know about it is if he saw it on Jimi when he treated him…It is pretty disgusting seeing the dedicated liar Jason trying to ignore this…
Jason is correct when he says Bannister’s saying Jimi was saturated in wine would be hard to miss…That’s why Dr Siefert commented “Jimi was covered in wine”…
Jason is lying when he says the ambulance men saw no wine on Hendrix…Reality dictates that for all 3 emergency room doctors to have mentioned wine soaking Jimi means it had to be soaking Jimi at the Samarkand too…
Jason is lying when he says forensic analysis was done on the blankets…He’s pulling that out of his ass and has no evidence for it…The blankets were stained with vomited wine…The ambulance men simply called it “vomit” because they had no reason at the time to distinguish its wine component…Jason is simply trying to contrive a false argument…
Dr Siefert said on video tape “Jimi was covered in red wine”…You can see Jason’s dishonest attempts to avoid giving that an honest answer in this thread…That wine was obviously evidence of the wine Jimi was drowned with and is also the wine Dr Thurston spoke of…
While Jason lectures us on medical procedure he lies and ignores that the official cause of death listed at the Inquest was suffocation on vomit due to barbiturate intoxication…It did not state overdose as Jason falsely says…That “vomit” was mostly wine…
Jason is ignoring that the Hospital report said “Failed To Resuscitate”…So his lie that no treatment was done on Jimi is refuted by that report…Their wording shows they attempted to resuscitate and failed…That attempt was recorded on that same report in the half hour treatment time listed as 11:45am to 12:15…
What you are seeing here is the twisted effort of a troll to misconstrue and deliberately misrepresent the true testimony and witnessing of what happened that morning in to a misleading text of lies…It is easily refuted by just posting the real facts that Jason is obviously trying to lie around…Jason hasn’t touched our case or even put a scratch on it…Bannister never saw the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat because Siefert and the nurses removed it before he got to the scene…What that proves is Bannister is very accurate to what he witnessed…And by the same measure the ambulance men never saw the wine in the lungs and stomach because they never penetrated the plug of vomit…You can see how hard Jason tries to get around this with some rather remarkably stupid arguments that are obviously designed to deceive himself over what he knows is true…However any persons of average intelligence can see Jason has failed to make his own argument…He’s a fool who all you have to do is wait for him at the finish line to knock him over with a breath…
Let us know when you are done with your trolling Jason because the facts have already disproven you several times over…
All your garbage theories have been refuted.
You have no facts only garbage and lies.
“JASON, the lying-denying pig-breeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:06 pm
All your garbage theories have been refuted.
You have no facts only garbage and lies.”
Nice job of Jason talking to himself only, here. Jason’s garbage theories have been refuted & Jason has an overwhelming amount of self-decreed fabrications (garbage and lies) that Jason pulls out of his ass, with no credible reference sources to back them up.
Keep wallowing away, Jason.
This wine troll still can’t produce any documentation of the wine he claims LOL
Dr Crompton sighted the autopsy report to make this call about the fluid. If any work was done in casualty then Jimi was unconscious and not dead. This tallies with what Dr. Crompton stated above and what the ambulance officers witnessed that morning. Resuscitation is attempted if there is any chance of someone being brought back to life and never on someone who had been dead for hours as Jimi was. The doctors would have clearly known the difference just through experience. Apart from that it is illegal to do any work on a deceased body before the coroner sees it therefore how could Jimi have been worked on if he was DOA. So clearly you would need to be very foolish to believe that Jimi was worked on for half an hour in casualty like Dr. Bannister said. Dr. Seifert stated that he was waiting for Gerry to identify the body so he could complete the paper work; this sounded far more realistic in light of the fact that Jimi was DOA and not unconscious. The wine is totally irrelevant in this story as Jimi had a lethal dose of Vesparax in his system causing him to chock on his own vomit. Tin foil hatters are trying to steer this discourse towards murder through waterboarding that is why they make such a big deal over the presence of wine and pay little attention to the actual cause of death which was inhalation of vomit due barbiturate intoxication. They relied heavily on the contents of Wright’s book even though it has been totally discredited but have you noticed how they still stick to the basic story and failed to move on from it. They then seek other dubious avenues to hang their equally dubious claims on like Albert Allen. We have asked continually for who the murderer was as they insist it was Michael Jeffrey even though he was in Spain at the time. You can’t have a murder without the murderer. So who is it? Please answer the question and don’t try to get out of answering it by calling people names as your usual ploy.
They can’t answer any questions that exposes their phony hoax.
They refuse to name who they say “murdered” Jimi.
They have no evidence of a “waterboarding murder scene” at the flat cuz nobody witnessed it.
They have no official documented evidence of a “hard plug” of vomit being removed.
They have no official documented evidence of a “wine removal” being performed.
They can’t claim “treatments” were performed on a corpse that was dead for 6 hours starting to rot, since that is illegal.
They can’t claim Fraud Bannister “disposed of the wine” since that is illegal.
They claim Teare forged the numbers when the evidence is against them.
They claim Bob Brown wasn’t citing Teare’s results 42 years later when he was.
They claim to know everything Jimi was doing at Kameron’s party when even the guests that were there don’t even know everything he was doing.
All they provide is an alternate fantasy story while discrediting the real facts claiming it never happened.
Tin foil hatters still can never change events that already happened.
“JASON says:
October 25, 2019 at 4:01 pm
Hi Ivana,
These two clowns are providing pure comedy.
Buster the clown can’t even keep his stories straight.
His hoaxing sidekick Flysquatter keeps posting my quotes that refutes his phony hoax.
i hope he keeps it up.
They have nothing except to discredit the real evidence and make stuff up.”
IS THAT SO? In that case, we’ll be happy to re-post those quotes & we’ll add to them to show the total buffoonery by Jason. Here they are:
“JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 3:20 am
“Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix. Brown only said he had a “bit too much to drink”.”
And next we have this:
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:04 pm
“We all know Hendrix was drinking wine during the evening at Harvey’s flat. He had more wine with Monika before he took a bath and wrote his final poem “The Story of Life”. Then he had more wine at Kameron’s party when he ingested a powerful amphetamine and ate a rice meal. This is the ‘bit ‘ too much Brown was talking about. Brown never said Hendrix was ‘drowned in wine’ like these wine hoaxers claim.”
Jason is first claiming that “Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix” and then same-day he is claiming that the wine that Jimi drank at Harvey’s and Cameron’s was the “bit too much Brown was talking about”. Of course, as stated earlier — the autopsy revealed a blood alcohol content of .005%, meaning that any wine that Jimi drank at either of those two places was long digested and gone — meaning there is no way Dr. Brown could be referencing wine that may have been drank at Harvey’s or Cameron’s. Can’t have it both ways.
Now we get this, as a result of Jason tripping over his own tongue & getting exposed doing so……………..
“JASON says:
October 23, 2019 at 8:15 pm
Doctor Bob Brown made his comment almost 40 years after Jimi’s death. Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.
Teare found that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml, enough to fail a breathalyzer test.
Doctor Bob Brown said Hendrix had “a ‘bit’ too much to drink”. That was the ‘bit’ he was referring to.””
As stated in my post above…….How can Jason keep claiming “no wine” and then turn around and state “Teare found that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100 mg per 100 ml” to try to back his lie about Dr. Brown citing the autopsy? Total contradiction by the lying-denying pig-breeder that just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
And of course, there is major problems with Jason’s self decreed fabrication that he pulls out of his ass regarding “Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.”
1) If Dr. Brown were really citing the autopsy, as Jason falsely claims, then wouldn’t Dr. Brown know that what Dr. Teare was saying about the 100mg was only an ESTIMATE of BAC at the time of Vesperax ingestion? Why of course, Dr. Brown would know that, as Dr. Teare told this to the Inquest and wrote it down in his report.
So with Dr. Brown knowing that the 100mg of BAC was just an estimate, then how can Dr. Brown be referencing that as “bit’ too much to drink”, as Jason falsely claims?
ANSWER: Dr. Brown wasn’t citing the autopsy when he stated that Jimi “had a bit too much to drink” — he telling about what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at the hospital and Jason is just a blatant liar that is making up that fabrication.
2) If Dr. Brown were really citing the autopsy, as Jason falsely claims, then wouldn’t Dr. Brown know that the autopsy stated that Jimi’s REAL blood alcohol content was .005%?
Why of course, Dr. Brown would know that, as it’s written in the autopsy.
Which leads to the obvious question — how could those two parameters ( 100mg ESTIMATE of BAC at the time of Vesperax ingestion & REAL blood alcohol content that was .005%) be referenced by ANYBODY — let alone a certified doctor like Dr. Bob Brown — as being “a bit too much to drink”?
ANSWER: It PROVES that Dr. Brown wasn’t referencing the autopsy report and Jason is just a blatant liar pulling that self-decreed fabrication out of his ass. Dr. Brown was citing what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at the hospital and Jason can’t provide any proof otherwise & the question of “what would make Dr Brown think that Jimi had a bit too much to drink?” remains unanswered by Jason.
What was Jason saying about “reading comprehension”? Oh wait…it appears that Jason was referring to his own lack of “reading comprehension”.
Stand by folks, and watch Jason poop in his diaper because he can’t honestly answer or honestly refute the germane points made that expose his buffoonery. <—The keyword there is "honestly", as we know he'll post more of evasive, lying blather.
Hi Ivana,
The tin foil hat wine hoaxers have destroyed their own phony theory.
Buster agrees with Dr. Crompton’s assessment that Jimi died around 5:30 am but Buster also claims Crompton is in on a “cover up”.
So, Buster says Jimi died at 5:30 am. Jimi didn’t get to the hospital until 6 hours later. His his sidekick clown Flysquatter says Jimi was having “treatments” done for a half hour.
Could you imagine the condition Jimi’s body would be in already dead for 6 hours exposed to the elements? And these morons think a full medical team is going to be doing “treatments” on a 6 hour dead body? What do they expect these “treatments” would do?
No hospital in the world would be performing work on a 6 hour long dead body since it is against the law. They lose their phony claim just on this alone.
If the wine hoaxers want to claim “treatments” were done, then they need to claim that Jimi was still alive. That’s the only way these “treatments” would ever be allowed to be performed as a life saving procedure.
A DOA, especially a 6 hour long dead body is not worked on. A DOA is declared dead and that is it. Bob Brown specifically stated “No revival was possible” but the tin foil hatters ignore it and make up their own fantasy stories. 6 hour long dead bodies are not worked on. Call up any hospital in the world. But the hoaxers will make up more b.s.excuses since they are perpetrating a hoax. Flysquatter tries to use Elvis as an example…lol…Elvis just died when they tried to work on him. Hendrix was stiff after 6 hours.
BUSTER says: October 11, 2019
Dr Teare had no way of knowing about the wine because it was removed and disposed of 3 days earlier at the hospital.
This bogus statement from Buster destroys his own phony theory.
Buster says Teare didn’t know about the wine cuz Fraud Bannister removed it and “dumped it out”.
Sorry, this cannot happen. It is illegal for a doctor to tamper with a corpse by removing bodily fluids and disposing of it. Call up any hospital in the UK.
The remains must stay intact for the coroner to analyze for the autopsy. A doctor is not allowed to destroy bodily fluids from a corpse. That is illegal.
The only way tin foil hat wine hoaxers can claim a “wine removal” was performed is if they claim Hendrix was still alive to have these “procedures” done. That’s the only way that “wine” could be removed from Hendrix.
Fraud Bannister is already on the record stating Hendrix was already dead for hours, but then in 2009 he is claiming he “worked hard on Jimi to save his life”. So, he is claiming that Hendrix was still alive if he was “trying to save his life”. But in 1993 he said he was cold, blue, dead for several hours with the inside of his mouth was black. This crackpot just makes up fake stories.
Then the tin foil hat wine hoaxers claim not one, but two “treatments” were done in a 30 minute time period. They claim it took ten minutes to remove the fake “hard plug” of vomit and then the phony “wine removal” occurred.
Fraud Bannister claimed he was using a metal sucker to remove an entire body full of “wine”. Those suckers are not designed to remove large quantities of liquid from a body. Only small amounts. It would take hours to remove a body full of wine with that instrument.
Wine hoaxers claim the “procedure” took only 20 minutes to get done filling up 5 wine bottles. Then Fraud Bannister “dumped it all out” without documenting any of the “procedures” or saving the wine for analysis.
This is just a hoax and anybody that has an ounce of common sense laughs at this b.s.
Doctors don’t perform “procedures” on 6 hour long dead bodies. Doctors don’t remove bodily fluids and dispose of the contents. This is all a hoax.
The wine hoaxers destroy their own phony claim themselves.
Hi Jason. These two are crackpots for just believing that Jimi was murdered in the first place. Anyone with a healthy level of skepticism would realise that this story in a hoax yet they both fell for it. Look who they placed their trust in Tappy Wright, Bannister and Albert Allen but have decided that the real experts in this case like the forensics team are the ones who are not telling the truth and have been coerced into changing their story to cover up a murder. How dumb do you need to be to believe this really happened. Have you noticed Jason how the wine is a really big deal in this story even though Jimi’s death had nothing to do with wine but was a result of a lethal dose of barbiturates just like the autopsy revealed and the death certificate stated. These hoaxers conceal the real evidence in order to push their own suspicious claims hoping that more and more people will buy into it.
Hi Ivana,
They certainly are crackpots to the highest level.
Yes, they do anything to make extraordinary claims of wine every chance they get, except at the death scene when Buster the clown claims brown vomit means “red wine” since he really knows no wine exists. He just needs to keep up the charade to push his phony scam. It’s so bogus and fake I don’t see how they can believe it. Maybe they are trying to sell dvd’s and books pushing this bogus Hendrix murder so they keep it going.
What loses their phony case is, when Buster the clown claims a 6 hour long dead Jimi Hendrix is getting “life saving procedures” done by Fraud Bannister after Bannister said he was cold and blue with the inside of his mouth all black. Only in a decades old B horror movie would this take place. No hospital would allow this to happen. Their phony hoax has been drowned in imaginary wine.
Buster continues drowning in his lies of phony wine still claiming Bannister did “procedures” on a 6 hour dead corpse. Do these lunatics think Jimi would jump up and start singing “Hey Joe”?
Buster says that Hendrix died at 5:30am as he cites Dr. Crompton’s assessment. Then 6 hours later, Buster is claiming Bannister is performing “life saving procedures” on Hendrix when Bannister said Hendrix arrived at the hospital with his mouth already black and rotting. Buster is a lunatic.
What would be the point of these “procedures”? Newspaper reports on 9/18 & 9/19/70 said Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival and then was shipped off to the morgue awaiting an autopsy. Everybody can see why coming to a hospital in this condition. Then in 1992 we get all the lies of phony wine and “life saving procedures”. What a freaking joke. What’s worse, is these two total and complete imbeciles think these hoax claims are accurate.
Hospitals do not allow doctors to perform “treatments” on a 6 hour dead mouth rotting corpse waiting for an autopsy. All the contents of the body must remain intact for the coroner to determine the offical cause of death. Removing anything from a dead body is illegal since it alters the official cause of death. This is the precise reason that no “treatments” were ever done on Jimi Hendrix. St. Mary Abbots Hospital would never allow this to happen since they would face major law suits. These frauds who are pushing this wine scam have no ideas about laws and regulations. They think can deceive people as they spin their phony tale. But when real facts stand in their way we get bogus excuses and backpeadling from hoaxers like Buster. Then the phony scam falls apart like it has been for a long time for him.
Dr. Siefert told Kathy Etchingham that no “procedures” were ever performed on Hendrix besides the basic resuscitation attempt as a formality.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Dr. Siefert makes it very clear that nothing was done for Hendrix except the basic formality. Nowhere does he state “hard plugs of vomit” was removed or a 20 minute “wine removal”. Those fake claims are all bullshit. This man is telling Kathy Etchingham in his testimony that nothing like was done. Buster the clown and his junior sidekick Hoaxer Flysquatter pretend this doesn’t exist and claim their phony “treatments” anyway. They only have fake stories and bogus claims. Well, this is documented testimony that forever refutes them.
BUSTER says: Bannister made no reckless decision to treat a dead body and what really happened, and the reasons for it, is nowhere close to the false version Jason concocts for trolling purposes…Jason is trying to place all the blame on Bannister so he can dismiss him and therefore conveniently dismiss all the evidence through him…But he is doing so by radically misrepresenting the truth and how things really happened…
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital”- Ex Doctor Bannister
JASON says: Fraud Bannister clearly states Hendrix was “dead for hours”. These are his own words. He said: No pulse, inside of his mouth was black cuz he was dead for hours, no circulation, and was dead for hours before arriving at the hospital. This is exactly what I posted. Sounds like a reckless decision to treat a 6 hour dead body to me and to all the readers as well. Why are you lying?
Yes, it is a reckless decision to do “treatments” on a stiff corpse that’s been dead for 6 hours with a mouth that’s already turned black. Bannister is a lunatic for even claiming he tried to “save a man” in this condition and you’re agreeing with him lying that there were half hour “treatments” done. No hospital on Earth would allow this to go on. What you are claiming happened, would be something coming out of a some B horror movie. Ridiculous nonsense. People think you are a nut claiming “life saving procedures” were done on a 6 hour dead corpse described in this condition. And then you claim I haven’t put a “scratch” in your phony case. Freaking hilarious. It’s been totally been destroyed a long time ago, mostly by you, with your bullshit you post.
So, explain to the readers, and to me, how exactly I am “radically misrepresenting the truth” and posting a “false version” as you falsely claim? These are Bannister’s exact words of what he said. Now how do you answer that?
This lying wine troll Buster the clown has been caught red handed yet again changing his phony claims. Not sure why he still thinks he can get away with his blatant lies and constantly changing of his phony stories. Just another time he shows us that he has no credibility, how what a lousy debater he is, and how weak his fake hoax is. Then he has enough nerve to lie using his usual projection technique. Pathetic!
BUSTER says: What you are seeing here is the twisted effort of a troll to misconstrue and deliberately misrepresent the true testimony and witnessing of what happened that morning in to a misleading text of lies.
JASON says: What we are witnessing here is a pathological liar like yourself changing your stories again to push your phony hoax. You are getting worse, since you change your fake stories in contradiction in the same exact post. You aren’t fooling anybody but yourself. We have all your lies here for all to see in black and white.
BUSTER says: October 26, 2019
Bannister never saw the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat because Siefert and the nurses removed it before he got to the scene.
BUSTER says: October 26, 2019
The real truth is Dr Siefert stayed right along side Bannister for the full half hour treatment period.
JASON says: So, this troll first claims Bannister never saw a “hard plug of vomit” and then he says Bannister saw it with Siefert.
In his first quote, Buster says: Bannister “never saw the hard plug cuz Siefert removed it before he got to the scene.”
In his second quote, Buster says: Bannister and Siefert were together side by side for the full half hour treatment period. That would mean Bannister did see the “hard plug of vomit” since Buster says Bannister was on the scene for the “full half hour treatment period”.
So Buster, was Bannister there or not there on the scene to see the phony “hard plug of vomit”? Which is it? It can’t be both.
Buster the wine troll thought he was being clever to suddenly change his fake story again. But as usual, the troll got caught red handed once again, changing his phony claims, in order for him to say he won a “debate”.
Buster lied saying Bannister never saw the “hard plug of vomit”, but he forgot he said that Bannister and Siefert were side by side for the “full half hour treatment”. That would mean Bannister was there to see the “hard plug of vomit” since Buster keeps claiming it was a 30 minute period. So, Buster got caught again in another mortal lie.
Then he has enough nerve to claim that I haven’t “scratched the surface” of his phony theory. It’s been destroyed a long time ago, mostly by himself.
See, if this fool had a case, he wouldn’t need to keep lying and changing his phony stories all the time. He has nothing, which is why he constantly does this. Then he is ignorant enough to think I won’t notice his sneaky schemes. I know his phony case better than he does.
Now he will go ballistic, swear at me, demand that I get banned, and say I’m “ripping his words out of context”. No sir, i’m just posting all his lies and changing of his fake stories for all to see. This joker has zero credibility in the Hendrix community.
And for the record, there never was a “hard plug of vomit” in Jimis throat, that’s another fake scam made up by Buster the clown so he still can claim his imaginary wine that doesn’t exist. No doctor or hospital is going to perform “treatments” on a 6 hour dead body unless your are watching a decades old B horror movie.
Hi Jason. Have you noticed how Buster always says he spoke to Bannister, Kathy, Albert Allen and anyone else he can think of. Funny how none of them are posting here to defend Buster’s claims. Kathy would never give credence to someone like Buster as she openly said she does not believe Jimi was murdered and I think we can safely say this is another empty and false claim by Buster. Using derogatory language towards opponents is a feeble attempt to make himself look credible and an authority on the subject however it has the opposite effect. It makes him look desperate. He has been banned from a number of sites because of his ridiculous claims and not for any other reason he would have us believe; they considered his comments to be a bunch of lies, and far fetched. Every where he posted he tried to monopolise the conversation but most of the time he was given the cold shoulder, ignored and banned because of his outrageous claims and remarks made towards other posters similar to these. It’s fair to say he uses the same tactics wherever he posts but some threads had the good sense to just let him go.
Hi Ivana,
I sure have. Buster only had conversations with these people in his crazy head. He is a one trick pony “claiming somebody told me this” and he uses it as his phony evidence. He writes in an “authoritative tone” pretending to be an authority on Jimi Hendrix and that’s what makes him hilarious. It’s pure comedy gold. I’ve seen that he’s been banned from Hendrix sites acting like a jerk and acting like he does here. Ive never seen anybody take him seriously when I read those sites except for the gnat who might be his alter ego posting.
Jason is a sick pup named Casey LeDoux…You can go to his Facebook page and see he sports a trolling avatar which should tell you all you need to know about him…Casey followed me here from Kennedy assassination websites because I smoked him over there and he was burned so he decided to come over here and troll me in revenge…He’s not a well person and in no way are his purposes here serious or honorable…If you want to get an idea of what Casey is about go to the REOPENKENNEDYCASE website and see what a group of nuts is assembled over there…Casey calls himself Ed LeDoux there…Just read the postings there if you make the mistake of taking Casey seriously…As should already be apparent to anyone who possesses any basic intelligence, Casey is trolling this subject and learned about it for the first time when he started posting (or should I say trolling) here…He’s pretending he’s offering a serious other side but he’s just here to idiotically troll…He could be a government internet spook whose purpose is to gaslight serious internet whistleblowers like myself…
Anyone can see Jason’s false arguments above are self-defeating because he contradicts himself so badly within his own offerings that they refute themselves…Jason knows he is not telling the truth when he says Bannister was working on a body that had been dead for 6 hours…Siefert and Bannister had no idea how long Jimi had been dead when they received him because the only thing they knew is Jimi turned up at their emergency room and they went to work…Jason is dishonestly ignoring that Siefert and Bannister did what they would have done with anyone in that situation and simply went to work on him to save him…Jason blatantly ignores that persons have been brought back to life from that condition many times before so contrary to the false spin Jason is desperately trying to put on it the two doctors were not doing anything wrong and were operating perfectly within the normal procedures Jason pretends to cite…
The reason Bannister and Siefert did not know they were working on a body that had been dead for 6 hours is because Dr Crompton did not determine Jimi had died at 5:30am until 1991 when Kathy went to him…Until then people had assumed Monika’s story was accurate and Jimi died enroute to hospital…That’s why Jason’s garbage is self-refuting because he’s stupidly trying to tie things together that have no connection at all and he’s using it to make false claims…Jason is inferring Bannister was supposed to know that Jimi had been dead for 6 hours, but that’s a silly, stupid claim that deliberately rips the true evidence out of context…Jason (or should I say Casey) is just a trolling asshole who is trying to gum up the thread by throwing any crazy shit he can think of in to the discussion in order not to answer our correct evidence…A troll must always stay on the offensive and be asking the questions or it quickly becomes apparent that he has failed to answer the evidence…Anyone can see he is using this demented trolling technique to avoid answering our valid evidence…Jason then asks us to entertain his lecture on the illegality of treating dead bodies when it is obviously just the sick diversion of an obnoxious troll designed to distract us from what really happened…
Jason furthers his assholery by admitting Siefert treated Jimi with a resuscitation attempt…Jason is so full of demented fervor that he doesn’t realize this directly contradicts his trolling entry in the same post that said Jimi was never treated and went straight to the morgue…You see Jason is a sick pup so in his moronic attempt to string mis-quotes together he didn’t notice that he directly contradicted himself…In any case, Jason has finally entered a fact here…Siefert did treat Jimi with a resuscitation attempt as Jason correctly cites here…As Dr Bannister correctly related, he and Siefert did make a resuscitation attempt on Jimi and it involved 20 minutes of suctioning wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach as well as an ensuing 10 minute ventilation attempt…
To cut to the chase nothing Jason writes above does anything to disprove or overturn the fact that the ambulance men could not get through the hard plug of vomit they more than clearly described…Despite Jason’s lying, trolling attempt to say the ambulance men saw no wine, the true record shows they had no means to see that internal wine because it was blocked behind the vomit…The next thing that happened was Dr Siefert got to Jimi before Bannister arrived so he removed the plug of vomit with the hospital staff…By the time Bannister got there he saw the wine in Jimi’s throat that was exposed when Siefert removed the plug of vomit…Then both Siefert and Bannister removed the 5 bottles of wine from Jimi…This is what happened because Dr Bannister told me himself…
Jason ignores the fact that Siefert was not asked about what happened until 1990 when Kathy first made her petition…Anyone can see from Siefert’s wording that he’s not volunteering anything and is staying away from the incriminating facts like the wine…He’s doing that because he’s in London where the government that covered it up was centered…He’s also avoiding any malpractice liability…
Jason thinks he’s getting away with ignoring Scotland Yard never interviewing the nurses who could have confirmed all this…If you want to judge who’s right here just watch for what Jason desperately ignores…
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
Neither of us two lying-denying pig-breeders (Jason and Sister Ivana Sow) answer any questions that exposes our phony hoax.”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
Neither of us (Jason and Ivana) have any evidence of “no wine” at the flat because nobody has ever stated that there wasn’t wine at the flat, but Monika said there was & 5 doctors also made reference to wine later on, so if the wine was witnessed by three doctors at the hospital, then it had to be witnessed at the Samarkand.”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
We (Jason and Ivana) have no official documented evidence of a “hard plug” of vomit not being removed, as Saua stated he could not get an airway, so the vomit Saua couldn’t get through had to removed at the hospital & the autopsy report never mention anything about vomit being stuck in Jimi’s throat”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
We (Jason and Ivana) can’t claim “treatments” weren’t performed on JImi, because the hospital report states a time of treatment from 11:45AM to 12:15PM and the coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate”, clearly indicating that a resuscitation attempt was made, but failed.”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
We (Jason and Ivana) can’t claim the medical staff didn’t “dispose of the wine”, even if that is illegal, because we weren’t there to witness anything & have no credible documented testimony to prove otherwise (same as with all our other blather)”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
They claim Teare forged the numbers because Teare made an estimation of 100mg that was later proved to be false & he did, in fact, post a 2nd set of barbitural numbers in his autopsy report, leaving any object observers to question why did Teare feel the need to do either. But, as far objective observation goes, everybody knows that we (Jason and Ivana) are too busy wallowing in our own pigshit mire of denial of reality to even consider doing that ”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
I claimed Bob Brown was citing Teare’s results 42 years later when he wasn’t, because I couldn’t answer what made Dr. Brown think Jimi had too much to drink & I also could not answer Flyswatter’s germane points that destroyed this phony theory of ‘Brown citing the autopsy report’ that took me over a week to pull out of my ass.”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
They claim that Jimi wasn’t drunk at Cameron’s party because witnesses that were there at the party said Jimi was in control of his faculties when Jimi left at 3:00AM, but this doesn’t fit with our phony narrative of Dr. Brown witnessing wine Jimi drank at Cameron’s, so we have to lie & say “They claim to know everything Jimi was doing at Kameron’s party when even the guests that were there don’t even know everything he was doing” ”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
All we (Jason and Ivana) provide is an alternate fantasy story while discrediting the real facts claiming it never happened.”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
Us lying-denying pig-breeders (Jason and Ivana) think that we can change events that already happened with our self-decreed fabrications & lying misquotes that we repeatedly pull out of our asses (along with having no credible reference sources to back up what we are saying) — but we can’t.”
^^ FIXED !!
See how easy it is to take Jason’s blather and make him look STUPID.
“JASON says:
October 27, 2019 at 6:03 am
No doctor or hospital is going to perform “treatments” on a 6 hour dead body unless your are watching a decades old B horror movie.”
Don’t you just love how Jason talks this dumb shit as though every hospital treats every patient that comes in as bullet-ridden corpse, and Jason self-pronounces this, as though Jason has been in charge of every existing medical staff throughout the world for the last century.
According to Jason’s logic, no medical team is going to treat a choking/drowning victim and try to clear the victim’s airways and remove fluid from the lungs just because “Jason says it’s illegal”. What a self-delusional cluck.
BUSTER says: Jason is a sick pup named Casey LeDoux…You can go to his Facebook page and see he sports a trolling avatar which should tell you all you need to know about him…Casey followed me here from Kennedy assassination websites because I smoked him over there and he was burned so he decided to come over here and troll me in revenge…He’s not a well person and in no way are his purposes here serious or honorable…If you want to get an idea of what Casey is about go to the REOPENKENNEDYCASE website and see what a group of nuts is assembled over there…Casey calls himself Ed LeDoux there…Just read the postings there if you make the mistake of taking Casey seriously…As should already be apparent to anyone who possesses any basic intelligence, Casey is trolling this subject and learned about it for the first time when he started posting (or should I say trolling) here…He’s pretending he’s offering a serious other side but he’s just here to idiotically troll…He could be a government internet spook whose purpose is to gaslight serious internet whistleblowers like myself…
JASON says: Absolutely hilarious. The only sick person here is you saying I’m some random guy so you can save face after your phony hoax was exposed. Just admit you have zero evidence and you’re not the expert you think you are. Thanks for the laugh.
BUSTER says: Anyone can see Jason’s false arguments above are self-defeating because he contradicts himself so badly within his own offerings that they refute themselves…Jason knows he is not telling the truth when he says Bannister was working on a body that had been dead for 6 hours…Siefert and Bannister had no idea how long Jimi had been dead when they received him because the only thing they knew is Jimi turned up at their emergency room and they went to work…Jason is dishonestly ignoring that Siefert and Bannister did what they would have done with anyone in that situation and simply went to work on him to save him…Jason blatantly ignores that persons have been brought back to life from that condition many times before so contrary to the false spin Jason is desperately trying to put on it the two doctors were not doing anything wrong and were operating perfectly within the normal procedures Jason pretends to cite…
JASON says: It’s Perfectly normal to do procedures on a 6 hour dead corpse? What are you talking about? Bannister is on the record stating Hendrix was already dead for hours. So yes, he knew that he was dead for hours.
I have no idea why you think Hendrix could be brought back to life. What is wrong with you? Like seriously? I posted the exact words from Bannister and Siefert and you just ignore it and ramble on nonsensically about the same stuff.
Hendrix was dead on arrival and was dead for 6 hours. Doctors do not do work on 6 hour long dead bodies awaiting an autopsy. I don’t know how many times you have to be told this.
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital”- Ex Doctor Bannister
JASON says: Can you read this Buster? Bannister said Hendrix was dead for hours. Read Bannister’s description of Hendrix. Do you think a man in this condition could be brought back to life?
BUSTER says: The reason Bannister and Siefert did not know they were working on a body that had been dead for 6 hours is because Dr Crompton did not determine Jimi had died at 5:30am until 1991 when Kathy went to him…Until then people had assumed Monika’s story was accurate and Jimi died enroute to hospital…That’s why Jason’s garbage is self-refuting because he’s stupidly trying to tie things together that have no connection at all and he’s using it to make false claims…Jason is inferring Bannister was supposed to know that Jimi had been dead for 6 hours, but that’s a silly, stupid claim that deliberately rips the true evidence out of context…Jason (or should I say Casey) is just a trolling asshole who is trying to gum up the thread by throwing any crazy shit he can think of in to the discussion in order not to answer our correct evidence…A troll must always stay on the offensive and be asking the questions or it quickly becomes apparent that he has failed to answer the evidence…Anyone can see he is using this demented trolling technique to avoid answering our valid evidence…Jason then asks us to entertain his lecture on the illegality of treating dead bodies when it is obviously just the sick diversion of an obnoxious troll designed to distract us from what really happened…
JASON says: I guess the black membranes and stiff body wouldn’t be enough obvious for them to know lol. Your Crompton claim is bogus since trained doctors can estimate death time for dead bodies.
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. “- ex Doctor Bannister
JASON says: Why do you keep lying and saying Bannister didn’t know that Hendrix was dead for hours? He is saying that to you in the quote above. Can’t you understand that?
“The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital”- Ex Doctor Bannister
JASON says: Can you read this Buster? Bannister said Hendrix was dead and the inside of his mouth was black.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: Siefert is telling you no procedures were ever performed.
BUSTER says: Jason furthers his assholery by admitting Siefert treated Jimi with a resuscitation attempt…Jason is so full of demented fervor that he doesn’t realize this directly contradicts his trolling entry in the same post that said Jimi was never treated and went straight to the morgue…You see Jason is a sick pup so in his moronic attempt to string mis-quotes together he didn’t notice that he directly contradicted himself…In any case, Jason has finally entered a fact here…Siefert did treat Jimi with a resuscitation attempt as Jason correctly cites here…As Dr Bannister correctly related, he and Siefert did make a resuscitation attempt on Jimi and it involved 20 minutes of suctioning wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach as well as an ensuing 10 minute ventilation attempt…
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: Dr. Siefert refutes you. No procedures were done on Hendrix. Any attempt to hook a person up to resuscitate them is considered an attempt but it failed as Siefert said. Again, you ignore Siefert’s testimony above and make up your asinine stories in your crazy head.
BUSTER says: To cut to the chase nothing Jason writes above does anything to disprove or overturn the fact that the ambulance men could not get through the hard plug of vomit they more than clearly described…Despite Jason’s lying, trolling attempt to say the ambulance men saw no wine, the true record shows they had no means to see that internal wine because it was blocked behind the vomit…The next thing that happened was Dr Siefert got to Jimi before Bannister arrived so he removed the plug of vomit with the hospital staff…By the time Bannister got there he saw the wine in Jimi’s throat that was exposed when Siefert removed the plug of vomit…Then both Siefert and Bannister removed the 5 bottles of wine from Jimi…This is what happened because Dr Bannister told me himself…
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: Same old ludicrous stories coming from your crazy head. There was no “hard plug of vomit”, wine, or any procedures done. This is all invented nonsense in your crazy head. Your phony claims have all been exposed as a fraud and you have zero evidence to prove your phony case. Now you are backpeadling on all your phony claims and you know it.
BUSTER says: Jason ignores the fact that Siefert was not asked about what happened until 1990 when Kathy first made her petition…Anyone can see from Siefert’s wording that he’s not volunteering anything and is staying away from the incriminating facts like the wine…He’s doing that because he’s in London where the government that covered it up was centered…He’s also avoiding any malpractice liability…
Jason thinks he’s getting away with ignoring Scotland Yard never interviewing the nurses who could have confirmed all this…If you want to judge who’s right here just watch for what Jason desperately ignores…
JASON says: Ah, another phony “cover up” claim and a new invented story cuz Siefert refutes your bogus claims.
No wine was ever witnessed at the flat.
You want the nurses to confirm it was a drug overdose like the official record states?
Jason wrote: “You want the nurses to confirm it was a drug overdose like the official record states?”
What this trolling asshole Jason is telling us is you can ignore all the trolling bullshit he wrote before this and just read his contemptuous response here to realize he can’t answer the evidence when confronted by it…Jason is an arrogant scumbag so he thinks he can control reality and ignore what I wrote in regard to the nurses…Jason literally cannot answer what I wrote so he openly trolls the issue of the nurses…
You can see that when confronted by it in public Jason cannot give any direct honest answer…He knows that the only reason Scotland Yard would not finish off the controversy by having the nurses confirm there was no wine and that Siefert only worked on Jimi for a few minutes is because they knew the nurses would not say that…Scotland Yard knew that the nurses would follow that medical code of conduct Jason keeps citing and speak of the wine they witnessed removed, as well as Siefert’s full participation for that half hour of treatment that was listed on the hospital report our demented friend here Jason is ignoring…
Jason is a filthy scumbag so he’s deliberately ignoring that Bannister’s witnessing of the wine did not make Scotland Yard’s phony investigation in 1992…He’s lying and pretending it was entered in to the record and investigated…Another rotten piece of shit named Caesar Glebbeek made sure that didn’t happen and the ball was dropped on Bannister’s witnessing when it would have done the most good…I do not know what Kathy Etchingham knew of Bannister’s letter…All I know is it was failed to be passed along and Jason is not honestly reflecting how this affected the case…If Bannister’s letter were passed along like it warranted any legitimate investigation would have immediately gone out and interrogated all the witnesses like any credible inquiry would…Instead of having this morass of un-followed-through-on uncertainty Siefert would have been asked how long he worked on Jimi and if he removed any wine?…The nurses would have been sought-out and interviewed and made to answer the same questions…And Dr Bannister would be given his true hero status and would have been interviewed, and his witnessing would have been entered in to the record like it deserved…Instead we see Scotland Yard doing the opposite and doing its best to avoid all this obvious basic police procedure…
If you look at Siefert’s evasive statement he had to know the nurses could have been called and would have publicly refuted his claim…So why would Siefert take that risk?…What this tells me is Siefert knew he would not be challenged and felt confident omitting his critical witnessing of the wine…This puts context to the level of corruption in the case and also shows the true context of Dr Thurston’s lack of coming forth on his witnessing of a belly full if wine and its forensic consequences…
Anyone can look at Jason’s response above to the nurses and see he’s struggling to answer it…It tells you all you need to know and also tells you why I own him and he has badly failed this debate…
Buster still hasn’t answered the question that supports the direct evidence of Jimi’s death that Buster is still struggling to answer that he’s now trying to avoid.
Buster, do you want the nurses to confirm that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose due to an inhalation of vomit and that no “procedures” were done on him as witnessed and confirmed by Doctor Bob Brown and Doctor Martin Siefert?
Boy, the lies and story changing keeps on coming from Buster the clown. This is the second time he’s done it in the same comment. Will he make it a trifecta of story changing lies? This is beyond patheic how this wine troll just lies and changes stories. He makes up total nonsense in his crazy head and has no idea of how he contradicts himself as he just rattles on like a loon.
BUSTER says: October 26, 2019
Jason is lying when he says Bannister removed the vomit…I spoke to Bannister and he told me Siefert had gotten there first and removed the plug of vomit…By the time Bannister arrived the wine was visible in the throat and was no longer blocked…
BUSTER says: October 26, 2019
The real truth is Dr Siefert stayed right along side Bannister for the full half hour treatment period.
JASON says: The only pathological liar here is you Buster. You lie about one thing and you lie about the other. You got caught red handed, yet again, changing fake stories in the same comment. You are on your way to a new record. You sure are desperate pathetically having to lie for your phony claims. All your lies have come back to haunt you early before Halloween.
First, Buster lies and says Siefert got there first before Bannister.
Second, Buster terribly contradicts that lie by saying Siefert was with Bannister side by side for the “full half hour treatment”.
So Buster, was Bannister there for the “full hour treatment period” or not? Which is it? You can’t have it both ways.
With this terrible contradiction, we see that both Buster and Bannister are pathological liars. Bannister lied saying Siefert “got there first” when Buster says both Siefert and Bannister were “together the whole time side by side” for the “full half hour treatment.”
So no, I am not lying since I’ve just proved these two jokers lie about everything they say.
For the record, there was never any “hard plug of vomit”. This is just a phony scam made up by Buster the clown so he can still make his bogus wine claim. Fraud Bannister is never on the offical record talking about “a hard plug of vomit” he only talks about the imaginary wine he claims. Siefert made it perfectly clear to Kathy Etchingham that no ‘procedures” were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix. Siefert pounded Jimi’s chest twice and that was it cuz he was a dead 6 hour corpse. Doctors are not allowed to do “procedures” on a dead 6 hour body. That’s for the coroner to examine for the autopsy. Buster has invented this whole scam. There was never any “hard plug of vomit” with wine gushing underneath. With Buster’s own pathological lying, he exposes his own phony scam as a fraud.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
I think all the readers have memorized this quote by now. Dr. Martin Siefert clearly told Kathy Etchingham that no “treatments” were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix. All Siefert did was pound Jimi’s heart a couple of times as a formality since Jimi was a dead 6 hour corpse. Buster the clown has lied making up total bullshit nonsense of 30 minute “treatments” of “hard plug of vomit” and wine removal” . This never happened. Siefert told this testimony to Kathy before all these bogus “treatment” claims started. So, you know that the claims are fraudulent. This entire bogus “Hendrix murder caper” are all based on phony after the fact claims. All this garbage never happened. It’s all phony baloney nonsense in order to push a hoax.
Buster quickly backpeadled hard after Bannister was exposed as a fraud. Buster now tries to makes Bannister just look like a bystander and shoves the blame all on to Siefert. This is just another pathological lie by Buster. You just read above where Siefert said nothing was done for Hendrix. All these phony “treatments” are lies from Buster. They never happened.
Fraud Bannister is the one who has made all these phony wine claims and pretends to have taken credit for trying to “save the life of Jimi Hendrix”. Bannister is a lying fraud since we have all his interviews contradicting his own lies. He says Hendrix was a dead corpse with a black rotted mouth cold dead and blue and then later he claims he was “frantically trying to save his life”. This is bogus and the fraud Buster the clown is desperately trying to change the script. Buster won’t be able to do that since all of Bannister’s lies have already been exposed in Parts one and two of my Bannister series, with parts 3 and 4 on the way, which will be even more damning for him. This whole phony “Hendrix murder” has already been exposed for the scam that it is.
Buster sure can’t seem to keep his phony stories straight and he changes his entire phony case in just one comment. Buster the clown hits a trifecta as he changes 3 stories so far in just one post. Could there be More? Stay tuned!
BUSTER says: The truth is the hard plug of vomit that the ambulance men couldn’t penetrate at the Samarkand was broken through at St Mary’s and below it was wine that flooded Jimi’s stomach and lungs up to the throat…The hard vomit was like a cork and when they unplugged it the wine was beneath…This was evidence of wine that was poured in to Jimi until he could hold no more…Evidence of “overkill” to make sure the job was done and he was dead.
BUSTER says: The simple truth is the doctors received a person with an abnormal amount of wine flooding his lungs and stomach and did what they had to do to in order to try and save him…
JASON says: One thing for sure is that Buster has no idea of what the word “truth” means.
First, Buster has been telling us that Hendrix arrived at the hospital with “a hard plug of vomit” in his throat that needed to be “removed” and then came all the gushing wine that shot up like a geyser.
Now Buster has changed his story to Bannister’s phony claim that Hendrix was received at the hospital with an “abnormal amount of wine flooding his lungs and stomach”. Buster now omits the phony “hard plug of vomit” claim.
So Buster, did Hendrix go to the hospital with a “hard plug of vomit” or not? Which is it? You can’t have it both ways.
Buster the clown his the trifecta with this beauty. Buster has been telling us that Jimi had a “hard plug of vomit” that prevented the ambulance men and doctors from witnessing the wine until it was penetrated and removed. Now Buster changes his fake story to Bannister’s version where Jimi was received with a “flooded throat of wine” flooding his lungs and stomach. How can that be when ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones only witnessed dry vomit all the way down Jimi’s throat? Buster changes his phony story again when it suits him.
Buster makes a mortal error destroying his whole phony hoax. Buster now says Hendrix was received at the hospital with an “abnormal amount of wine flooding his lungs and stomach”. This is the original phony claim that Bannister made and Buster originally used. We know this isn’t true cuz both ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed any wine flooding Jimi. They only witnessed dry vomit all the way down Jimi’s throat. Buster read the ambulance men’s testimony and got scared since their testimony destroyed Buster’s phony hoax. So, Buster invented the phony “hard plug of vomit” story so he could still claim wine was below it. Buster just screwed up again and said Hendrix was received at the hospital with “an abnormal amount of wine flooding his lungs and stomach”. He omits his phony “hard plug of vomit” claim proving it to be another hoax. So, Buster uses each fake story when it suits him and exposes his “hard plug of vomit” to be another fake scam.
Both ambulance men never witnessed a hard “plug of vomit” and Bannister is not on record ever talking about it. That was made up by Buster the clown. That’s why Buster the clown has backpedaled hard and now is trying to claim Bannister never saw the “hard plug of vomit” and is trying to put Bannister in a reduced role trying to shove everything on to Siefert.
This stupid idiot Buster didn’t see how he royally screwed himself with this desperate move. Siefert is already recorded in documented testimony stating he never “performed any procedures on Hendrix” just pounded his heart twice and that was it. So, Buster screws himself by putting everything on Siefert when Siefert testified to doing nothing for Hendrix. Buster proves himself to be a liar and destroys his new phony claim. Also, Bannister wanted to be the “big cheese” claiming he did all this “work” on Hendrix in interviews over the years.
So, Bannister was definitely telling the world he was in charge. Buster screws himself again with his new bogus claim trying to put Bannister in a reduced role. Then to top it all off, we caught Buster the clown in a contradiction where he said Siefert was side by side with Bannister for the “full half hour treatment”. So, that lie destroyed Buster’s new fake story of Siefert removing the fake “hard plug of vomit” and being in charge.
Plus Siefert never performed any procedures on Hendrix so Buster destroys that phony claim too. There was no “hard plug of vomit” or wine flooding Hendrix’s lungs and stomach. So, out of reckless haste to change his phony claims, Buster the clown managed to destroy his entire phony hoax in just one long bloated post. Hilarious! Let’s all toast Buster the clown with 5 bottles of wine!
This is just not very clever trolling, which is why I’ve won this “debate”…(A debate that consists of Jason riffing on his keyboard with obnoxious stupidity while ignoring all the evidence)…Jason isn’t too bright because his trolling replies refute his own claims just from their own internal conflicts…
Jason is trying to convert the ambulance men saying the dry vomit went all the way down into there being no internal wine…Not that we should take Jason seriously because by now it is obvious this crazy scumbag will say anything in order to ignore the evidence…His material is still inherently conflicting however…Jason is just stupidly ignoring that there was another interview with the ambulance men where they specifically said their ambulance sucker was too flimsy to penetrate the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat so they quit and packed him off to hospital…Jason is kind of dumb because he should understand that if the ambulance men could not penetrate the vomit then they had no way of knowing how far it went down Jimi’s throat…Jason is taking a statement where the ambulance men made clear they didn’t make much progress on Jimi in removing the vomit and turning it in to a false claim that the ambulance men knew how far the vomit went down…
The reality Jason is ignoring is we could have settled this very easily 30 years ago by simply asking the ambulance men how far they got in removing the vomit?…The other interview managed that and the outcome was that they clearly described making no progress in removing the vomit…Which means Jason’s claim here is false and the ambulance men had no way to know how far the vomit went down…Jason accuses us of making unproven claims but it is him who makes the false suggestion that the vomit went all the way down when any accurate interpretation of the material shows they had no way of knowing because they never got that far…Just like the 100mg estimate Jason uses and then dishonestly doesn’t admit has no basis…
It is important to establish that Siefert is not telling the truth and that Dr Bannister told me in person that Dr Siefert was right next to him for the full half hour of treatment…Jason is a dirty scumbag so he’s ignoring that Scotland Yard deliberately avoided bringing this to the level of confronting Siefert on his statement…Because Siefert is taking the dark path, like his dirty partner Jason here, of course Jason clings right to him and promotes his deceptive statement above everything…One liar naturally attracts to another…And once again, Jason tries to ignore that there was no excuse for Scotland Yard to not find and interview the nurses…Jason is a scumbag so he just ignores that and tries to pretend his trolling blather compensates for his not giving that honest admission…Scotland Yard deliberately avoided talking to the nurses because they knew damned-well what they would tell them…They knew they would witness the wine and knew they would also confirm that Dr Siefert, as the head registrar whose responsibility it was to oversee the event above the less than a year intern Bannister, had participated in everything Bannister did…This is the truth and may Jason be damned to hell for lying and denying it…
Jason is a fool because the end result of all his lying posts here is he offers a lot of bullshit and bluster but never quite gets around to answering the facts that he obviously tries too hard to deny but never quite manages to answer…He must think that people are pretty stupid that they would not see what a lying obnoxious bullshit artist he is who is just here to troll the evidence…The lie Jason is trying to get away with here is saying that the vomit went all the way down and therefore there was no wine…That of course is idiotic and any honest reading of the evidence shows the ambulance men did not clear any vomit and openly said we got Jimi off to hospital very quickly – which means they didn’t clear any vomit and therefore had no way of knowing how far the vomit went down Jimi’s throat…Jason is in contempt and lying and is trying to deny that the wine Siefert witnessed covering Jimi was wine spilled in the act of pouring it down his throat…He’s conducting a false parallel universe of deceit where he’s pretending the ambulance men could not have cleared all this up if asked at the time…
JASON says:
October 28, 2019 at 1:43 am
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
I think all the readers have memorized this quote by now. Dr. Martin Siefert clearly told Kathy Etchingham that no “treatments” were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix”.
Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, because anyone with any reading skills can see that Dr. Seifert is not telling Kathy that “no treatments” were done. Seifert says they did work on Jimi & just how long was this “few minutes” that Seifert was referring to? The hospital report says it was 30 minutes & the 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book that was published in 1990.
Jason stupidly thinks that he can milk a cow with his lie about Seifert saying “no treatments were done’, but Jason is too stupid to realize that he’s trying to milk a bull by pulling on the bull’s genitals with this lie.
Buster just contradicted his fake “hard plug of vomit” claim and everybody read it.
After Buster has been caught in several lies he’s been debunking his own hoax for us.
There was no wine witnessed on Jimi Hendrix at the flat, therefore no wine could be on Jimi later.
Both ambulance men witnessed and described dry vomit all the way down. They never testified to a “hard plug” or sucking out wine. It was only dry vomit.
Reginal Jones told Kathy Etchingham “Jimi choked” he never said “He was drowned or covered in wine”. He said he was covered in vomit not pure wine.
Officer Ian Smith confirmed it was a drug overdose call when he said “He got a lot of calls like that in those days”. He wasn’t getting wine drowning calls.
Hospitals don’t do strange procedures on a 6 hour long dead corpse. That is against the law to tamper with a body awaiting an autopsy.
This phony Hendrix murder caper gets worse each time the hoaxers tell it.
Because he’s been out-argued with the facts the troll Jason is just re-entering the same crazy shit again…
Jason has already been out-argued with the superior argument that if 3 medical professionals witnessed wine covering Jimi at Hospital then by simple logic he had to have that same wine on him at the Samarkand…His re-entry that there was no wine witnessed on Jimi at the Samarkand is a lie and is just Jason’s totally dishonest attempt to take advantage of semantics rather than honestly evaluate the evidence…The ambulance men did witness wine on Jimi at the Samarkand…They simply called it “vomit”…They also described it as a “pool” of vomit which means it had a high liquid content…You cannot undo wine witnessed at the hospital and say it wasn’t on Jimi at the Samarkand…Jason has lost on this point and his contemptuous ignoring of it and repeating the same disproven lie disqualifies him from serious debate…
Jason furthers his contempt by ignoring that the ambulance men could never know the vomit went “all the way down” because they never got that far in order to find out…Jason once again mis-quotes and takes advantage of false context…In another interview the ambulance men specified that their ambulance equipment was inadequate to penetrate the hard vomit in Jimi’s throat so they quit and packed Jimi in to the ambulance to get him to better equipment at the hospital…That other interview tells you they did not get very far so they therefore had no way of knowing how far down the vomit went…Just the fact they didn’t reach the wine tells you they failed to penetrate the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat…
Jason shows his sick intent by saying the ambulance men did not suck out any wine at the Samarkand…That is a straw man argument that Jason knows isn’t honest…Anyone who reads all the evidence will know, never did anyone suggest the ambulance men suctioned any wine from Jimi at the Samarkand…Any honest reading of the ambulance men’s statements shows they never claimed they removed any wine…In fact they made clear that they never removed any wine from Jimi because of the hard plug of vomit…So Jason knows he is making a false argument here…Jason is pretty sick…
Jason once again repeats this same false context by saying Jones said Jimi choked…Jason never honestly informs you that the evidence Jones witnessed at the time in the Samarkand did not allow him to realize that behind that dry vomit, he thought Jimi choked on, was 5 bottles of wine flooding the lungs and stomach…Jason is a liar…
Constable Smith was too far removed from the evidence…He was just there as a police control agent overseeing the ambulance men who were the main medical witnesses at the Samarkand…He was not in any credible position to determine the cause of death…He was however helpful in voicing that Jim was obviously dead…Monika lied about Jimi being alive because she was involved in the conspiracy to murder Jimi with Michael Jeffery…Smith was far from the hospital where the wine was witnessed and even further from the autopsy where murder was proven at a forensic level…
Jason is an outright liar when he says the hospital worked on a 6 hour dead body…He says that knowing the emergency room personnel had no way of knowing how long Jimi was dead when they received him…So once again, Jason enters knowingly-false information while ignoring the correct evidence…
Jason is trying really hard to mis-represent the evidence but the overall effect is working against him and making him look like a lying nut…
Hi Ivana,
Have you noticed how the wine hoaxers never can provide any definitive evidence for their phony case and they totally avoid the questions when you ask for the proof?
Hi Jason. What Buster posted lastly just made me laugh it’s sounding more and more like fiction. Now he is saying that Dr. Seifert is lying and Scotland Yard didn’t do their job properly because the nurses weren’t questioned. But of course Dr. Bannister is a saint because he fits in with Buster’s murder theory with his copious amount of red wine. Buster is also fond of using pseudonyms but I think he is Brian Doyle. David Key from the Jimi Hendrix Information Management Institute said, “You want peace and quiet on your site. Get rid of Brian Doyle. I have blocked him and he is not permitted on 3rd Stone. It’s so nice not having his aggravation around. Brian Doyle is a crank.” Sounds very much like “our friend”. The more you push these two hoaxers into a corner the more insulting they become because like you said Jason what they provide is not evidence it’s speculation disguised as fact/truth. I’ve also noticed that their offering more and more insignificant details and it’s pretty obvious there making it up as they go along. It just sounds so fake.
All of Buster’s posts are fiction and he’s changed all his phony stories from what they all used to be. Before Buster had Bannister removing the fake “hard plug of vomit” and coincidentally after I posted part 2 of my Bannister series, Buster changes it to Siefert doing it and Bannister was just a bystander. He is a troll. Is that his name? Where is that site at?
Hi Jason. It’s part of the Crosstown Torrents website. Buster uses a number of pseudonyms including scrum drum. Have a read a see what you think. I also listened to a podcast by Brian Doyle and he mentions Dr. Bannister a lot and uses the same scenarios he does here. Let me know what you think.
Buster gets caught red handed again lying in a major contradiction and still hasn’t answered the question. Let’s see if he does. Buster is clearly changing his stories and he can’t weasel out of his lies.
BUSTER says: October 26, 2019
Jason is lying when he says Bannister removed the vomit…I spoke to Bannister and he told me Siefert had gotten there first and removed the plug of vomit…By the time Bannister arrived the wine was visible in the throat and was no longer blocked…
BUSTER says: October 26, 2019
The real truth is Dr Siefert stayed right along side Bannister for the full half hour treatment period.
JASON says: Buster got caught red handed again changing his phony claims.
First, Buster lies and says Siefert got there first before Bannister.
Second, Buster terribly contradicts that lie by saying Siefert was with Bannister side by side for the “full half hour treatment”.
So Buster, was Bannister there for the “full hour treatment period” or not? Which is it? You can’t have it both ways.
Buster didn’t answer the question that supports the direct evidence of Jimi’s death that Buster is struggling to answer that he’s now trying to avoid.
Buster, do you want the nurses to confirm that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose due to an inhalation of vomit and that no “procedures” were done on him as witnessed and confirmed by Doctor Bob Brown and Doctor Martin Siefert?
Is Jason entering that idiotic point above because he is really that stupid or is he doing it because he’s trolling and trying to frustrate us with asinine material?…
I mean how stupid do you have to be to think that idiotic point he makes above actually serves to address what we are talking about?…Does Jason actually think that he can force the literal semantic interpretation of “the full half hour” to mean that I must be held to Siefert and Bannister getting there at the exact same time in order to have them both there for every second of that half hour or else the whole deal is off and everything can be thrown out?…That’s nuts and you would have to be pretty crazy or have no fear of destroying your own credibility to make that argument in public…Only a fairly crazy troll would make that claim in public and think it was serving to seriously address what we are talking about…
In the meantime, back in healthy, non-trolling, sober reality nothing Jason writes overturns the fact that Siefert got to Jimi first and removed the plug of vomit with the medical staff and that Bannister arrived right after and when he got there he witnessed the wine flooding up to Jimi’s throat…Unlike Jason, I have actually met and spoken to Dr Bannister and he told me this in person…So Jason is certifiably crazy if he thinks he can avoid honestly answering this by diverting in to a trolling question of the precise definition of a half hour…All Jason is doing is showing the public how unserious he and his intentions are here…Siefert got there shortly before Bannister and removed the hard plug of vomit and then the two of them worked on Jimi until 12:15…20 minutes of that effort was spent suctioning 5 bottles of wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach, as Bannister told me in person…Dr Siefert is not telling the truth and those who asked him did not press him enough with the details…Any skilled observer can see that Dr Siefert was avoiding discussing the details of the wine and half hour treatment period from his wording and the evasive nature of his statement…
Jason once again gives another good example of how a denial troll must always be the one asking the questions and trying to take control of the debate because otherwise it will become too clear that he is flopping on his face as far as the evidence…His entry above concerning the nurses is trollish and obnoxious…It obviously seeks to evade the original point…Jason knows just as well as I that Scotland Yard had no excuse for not finding and interviewing the nurses…They could have done it easily…In a case where any common definition of basic police procedures tells us we have a serious claim of a person being murdered by drowning in wine why in God’s name would Scotland Yard NOT find and interview the nurses?…Why would they NOT interview the attending doctor, Dr Bannister???…That doesn’t make sense…It is very obvious that if Scotland Yard thought Siefert’s version were true they would have quickly proven it by getting the nurses and having them say so…The nurses would have confirmed there was no wine and that Jimi was treated for just a few minutes and that was it…It would have been the shortest route…Jason damned-well knows as well as I that Scotland Yard went out of its way to avoid interviewing Bannister and the nurses because they knew what it would entail and they’d be forced to open a real investigation…Anyone with common sense can see Jason is saying the same thing above in his trolling answer…We know who didn’t answer the question here…Anyone can see Jason’s idiotic bumbling answer is the best he can do after being demolished…
Produce a written and signed statutory declaration and witnessed by a Justice of Peace from Dr. Bannister stating that he removed five bottles of wine from Jimi.
This fraud makes up fake stories for his hoax and got caught red handed. Buster thinks he can talk his way out of it.
Yes, the nurses would confirm what Dr. Siefert and Dr. Bob Brown both stated that Jimi died from a drug overdose and no revival was possible.
Also, hospitals don’t perform weird medical procedures on a 6 hour long dead corpse and all the doctors confirmed that from the condition of Hendrix’s body when it first arrived.
The only parts of this story that matter are the Vesparax, Monika Dannemann, the high dose of the barbiturate that caused Jimi to choke to death on his own vomit, the ambulance officers as the first on the scene, the police officers and finally the coroner’s report. All the rest is peripheral to this story things like Bannister and the nurses being interviewed by Scotland Yard. This may well have been because they just were not integral to the investigation or they did not want to be interviewed or they could not be located. This was not considered a murder investigation since Dr. Crompton stated that Jimi could not have survived because of the toxic level of barbiturate in his system. No where in this investigation was wine mentioned as the direct cause of death or deemed to be an important contributor to or factor in Jimi’s death. If it was then the outcome of the Scotland Yard investigation and the verdict would have differed and Monika would have been brought to trial.
No where were the copious amounts of wine that Bannister supposedly witnessed brought to the attention of Kathy or to Scotland Yard either because they simply did not exist or were not deemed important enough to be included in the investigation or is it simply that the wine had nothing whatsoever to do with Jimi’s death as did the toxic level of barbiturate in his system. The coroner would not have mistaken a wine drowning murder for an overdose since the wine would have been highly visible on Jimi’s body during the autopsy. The findings clearly state that Jimi died of a lethal dose of barbiturates and no where is wine mentioned as the direct cause of death or in any way contributing to his death.
Hi Ivana,
The wine hoaxers claim they have “evidence” but all they can provide is phony stories and quotes from their conspiracy books. Buster claims he “spoke to someone” and they tell him “privately ” the “evidence” he claims as he narrates his made up stories. This is not real evidence which is why I reject it. Wouldn’t you agree?
Any real documented evidence or testimony that proves Jimi died of an overdose the wine hoaxers claim is a lie or people were “gotten to” in a “cover up”.
Have you ever seen the wine hoaxers ever produce any real documented evidence of all these “medical procedures” they claim were performed on Jimi? Don’t you think they should start producing some evidence for what they claim?
Hi Jason. Absolutely. The number of people Buster says he knows and have told him information off camera and in private sounds really suspicious to me. I’ve asked for a stat dec for his Bannister claim. We have both asked him to tell us who the murderer was but he has been unable to answer because he knows full well Michael Jeffrey was in Spain. Now he has decided that Scotland Yard covered up the investigation into Jimi’s death and didn’t do a thorough enough job. What makes his story even more ridiculous and unbelievable is that he says the nurses weren’t interviewed as if this makes any difference to the outcome of what actually caused Jimi’s death. Our friend Buster or is it Brian still can’t let go of the five bottles of wine taken from a long dead corpse even though Dr. Seifert said he pounded Jimi’s chest for a few minutes and then waited for Gerry Stickells in that half hour to formally identify the body and sign the death certificate. I guess the truth is just not exciting enough for these two that they need to invent fantastical scenarios. Look forward to your next posts Jason.
Hi Ivana,
I have Parts 3 & 4 of Bannister left. Another week or so for those and then Jeffery will be next.
I will check that site out you mentioned with Buster.
It is indeed suspicious since Buster bases his “evidence” on off camera private conversations which he has no evidence of. Then he makes up fake stories based on that and demands us to answer it or “we lose the debate” lol.
Buster is whining about the nurses but they would just verify what Siefert and Brown already stated but Buster turns it into a conspiracy. He still doesn’t answer that question I’ve asked him.
Buster knows Jeffery was in Spain, that’s why he’s terrified to answer the “who murdered Jimi” question except Flysquatter answered for him lol. Buster now knows Jeffery was in Spain, so Buster had to make up new fake cover stories since before he was parroting Tappy’s phony tale. Just like the fake “hard plug of vomit” after Buster read Saua’s testimony of no wine, he invented the fake “hard plug of vomit”.
Buster also lied about the “5 bottles of wine”. He claimed it was less before. Now Buster is lying about Siefert removing the fake “hard plug of vomit” when before Buster said Bannister removed it. All these new fake stories, it’s hard to keep up. And Buster still keeps lying with his new fake story of Siefert getting there before Bannister did. What’s hilarious is it never happened anyway.
That’s how you know this is all a hoax with all the constant changing of stories.
Buster obviously can’t help himself being a pathological liar. I call him out on his lies and he goes right back to repeating the same lie he was called out on more than once. What is wrong with this guy?
BUSTER says: October 29, 2019
Jason writes overturns the fact that Siefert got to Jimi first and removed the plug of vomit with the medical staff and that Bannister arrived right after and when he got there he witnessed the wine flooding up to Jimi’s throat.
BUSTER says: October 26, 2019
The real truth is Dr Siefert stayed right along side Bannister for the full half hour treatment period.
JASON says: Buster has already said Siefert and Bannister were side by side for the full half hour. Bannister could not have arrived right after according to Buster’s lie. Buster keeps repeating this same lie.
BUSTER says: October 29, 2019
Siefert got there shortly before Bannister and removed the hard plug of vomit and then the two of them worked on Jimi until 12:15…20 minutes of that effort was spent suctioning 5 bottles of wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach, as Bannister told me in person.
BUSTER says: October 26, 2019
The real truth is Dr Siefert stayed right along side Bannister for the full half hour treatment period.
JASON says: Buster again has already said Siefert and Bannister were side by side for the full half hour. Siefert could not have got there shortly before Bannister according to Buster’s lie. Buster repeats this same lie again for a second time yesterday.
Buster, why do you keep repeating this same lie after you’ve been caught? You’ve done it twice again yesterday. Do you think that the readers and myself will not notice your weak trolling efforts?
So Buster, was Bannister there or not there when the “hard plug of vomit” was removed? Which is it? You can’t have it both ways.
We all know Buster is perpetrating another phony story and a hoax. Just look at the lies he already posted yesterday. There was never any “hard plug of vomit” or “procedures” done on Jimi Hendrix as a 6 hour long dead corpse. Dr. Martin Siefert already told us in his testimony to Kathy Etchingham that no procedures were ever done on Hendrix. Doctor Bob Brown confirmed that as well in his interviews that “no revival was possible”. This is documented witness testimony. All Buster can make up is he “talked to Bannister privately”. That is not evidence. No documented evidence of a “wine removal” and a “hard plug of vomit” removal ever was documented on Jimi Hendrix’s medical record. This means these phony “procedures” were never performed. No documentation of it exists, Siefert and Brown refutes these claims, and hospitals don’t perform weird medical procedures on a dead corpse that’s been dead for hours with a black rotting mouth. The more Buster spins his phony tale the worse it gets as he desperately spins out of control lying and contradicting himself along the way.
Good to know our case still doesn’t have a scratch on it from Jason…If Jason tried the crazy argument, that you can’t say Dr Bannister was there for the full half hour if Dr Siefert got there shortly before him, in a court with a judge not only would the judge cite him with contempt but he would probably slap him in a looney bin where him and his crazy arguments would have proper surroundings…
If you look at Jason’s last responses he visibly evaded giving an honest answer to why Scotland Yard avoided seeking, finding, and interviewing the nurses…If Jason is so sure that the wine business is all a hoax then he would agree the nurses would have confirmed it and ended the controversy…One of the quickest, shortest routes for Scotland Yard to end the issue would be for them to go locate the nurses and get them to confirm that there was no wine removal and that Jimi was only treated for a few minutes according to Jason’s version of events…Both Scotland Yard and Jason show the same guilty behavior in their avoidance of honestly addressing this…Not only did Scotland Yard not interview Dr Bannister (you would think they would be interested in interviewing him), but they also avoided interviewing Tappy Wright…Jason’s refusing to honestly answer this is a sure sign of guilt so I guess we can take that as the win it is…
Furthermore, in 2016 the REELZ Channel put out a program called ‘Autopsy’ where they went and reviewed the autopsies of famous celebrities…They did an episode on Jimi Hendrix using Dr Michael Hunter, the Medical Examiner of San Francisco…Dr Hunter pretended to examine Jimi’s autopsy and came to the conclusion that Jimi drowned in Oedemic fluid from chronic Pulmonary Edema (A drowning of the lungs from a pneumonia-like build up of body fluids)…Dr Hunter did not say Jimi died of a barbiturate overdose…He said Jimi drowned in fluids flooding his lungs…That is because Hunter saw the same barbiturate forensics I did and came to the same correct conclusion that both myself and the doctors Monika hired came to – that Jimi did not die from the pills…
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
October 29, 2019 at 10:51 pm
Dr. Martin Siefert already told us in his testimony to Kathy Etchingham that no procedures were ever done on Hendrix. Doctor Bob Brown confirmed that as well in his interviews that “no revival was possible”. This is documented witness testimony.”
This is NOT documented testimony. This is Jason employing his usual lying misquotes & self-decreed fabrications out of his ass.
Neither Dr. Seifert or Dr. Brown have ever stated that no treatments were done.
Jason is a blatant liar & Jason stupidly thinks that he can milk a cow with his lie about Seifert & Dr. Brown saying “no treatments were done’, but Jason is too stupid to realize that he’s trying to milk a bull by pulling on the bull’s genitals with this lie.
Not only do we have Jason’s lying hoaxes claiming Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown “confirming no treatments were ever done”, we also have multiple instances of Jason claiming the ambulance men saw “brown vomit only” and here are those instances.
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 9:03 pm
The ambulance men never witnessed “pure spilled wine” on the bed and pillows like your hoaxing clown Buster claimed. They only witnessed brown vomit.
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 6:55 pm
Red wine would be obvious to the ambulance men soaking the bed and pillows. They witnessed no red wine on the pillows. Just brown vomit. Buster has been refuted.
Red wine would be obvious soaking Jimi in a physical wine drowning. The ambulance men only witnessed brown vomit. Buster has been refuted.
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:53 pm
Buster the wine hoaxer claimed “pure red wine” was spilled and poured all over the bed, pillows, and on Jimi. That’s not what the ambulance men witnessed with only brown vomit on the pillows.
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:27 pm
They only saw brown vomit on Hendrix and inside the room
JASON says:
October 18, 2019 at 1:57 pm
The ambulance men never witnessed “pure wine on the bed”. They only saw brown vomit.
JASON says:
October 18, 2019 at 2:26 pm
Nobody at the flat witnessed massive amounts of pure wine They only saw brown vomit on the pillows.
JASON says:
October 18, 2019 at 4:26 pm
There only was brown vomit from the reaction to the high number of pills ingested. No “pure red wine” was ever witnessed.
JASON says:
October 20, 2019 at 2:52 am
We already know Buster lied when he said “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed. That was never witnessed. So, that means the ambulance men were correct when they said only brown vomit. John Saua and Reginal Jones never said wine cuz they never witnessed any wine.
JASON says:
October 20, 2019 at 2:57 am
They gave a perfect and very graphically detailed description of the brown vomit they witnessed and “wine” was never ever mentioned
JASON says:
October 20, 2019 at 3:49 am
Jones talks about brown vomit on the pillows and Saua talks about dry vomit in Hendrix. Nothing about wine flooding in Hendrix’s mouth and throat or soaked on his body.
**********************************************************************************
COUNT THEM — 10 instances, but let’s cross-check those 10 instances versus what Reg Jones really said to Kathy, which is copied and pasted exactly from Chapter 11 of Kathy’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”:
** Once we got settled, Reg told us his story. ‘When we got to the flat the door was wide open. The body was on the bed, covered in vomit of all colours, black, brown; all over him, all over the pillow. There wasn’t another soul in sight. I went back to the ambulance, thinking he was dead and that the circumstances were strange. A couple of young policemen turned up and they told us to take him to the hospital.’ ‘Is that the normal procedure?’ I asked. ‘No. Strictly speaking they shouldn’t have done that but they didn’t want to have to spend the whole afternoon filling in forms. We helped them out by taking the deceased to the casualty department. None of us realized it was Jimi Hendrix until we read it in the newspapers later that day.’ What the policemen should have done if they found a dead body was to call in the CID, but as far as they were concerned he was just another dead junkie in Notting Hill. Had Jimi been in the Cumberland Hotel where everyone knew who he was, it would have been a different story. **
Did you notice that Reg Jones told Kathy specifically “The body was on the bed, covered in vomit of all colours, black, brown; all over him, all over the pillow.” and NEVER said “brown only” as we have seen Jason falsely claim 10 (TEN) TIMES ??
“JASON says:
October 17, 2019 at 11:46 pm
The ambulance men refuted everything Buster has said.”
ANYBODY can see that Reg Jones is refuting what Jason has been repeatedly claiming.
Keep wallowing away, Jason.
I thought the relevant issue was the red wine and not what colour the vomit was. Did either of them mention witnessing red wine all over Jimi as you are claiming over and over again with your waterboarding scenario and murder scene? Clearly what was witnessed was an overdose and not a murder that is probably the reason they did not spend time filling out the paperwork. There was no one about at the Samarkand to ask specific questions and Jimi to them was an anonymous dead person. If Monika had been around instead of waiting across the road she would have been able to answer some of the questions.The police officers did however go back to interview Monika later that day so I’m assuming they completed the necessary paperwork then. If Jimi had gone back to the Cumberland Hotel instead of the Samarkand Hotel with Monika he would not have died that day.
TRANSLATED: Jason’s input has been discredited & Sister Ivana Sow demonstrates that she doesn’t have the capacity to THINK — as evidenced by her totally uninformative and irrelevant input which does nothing to gainsay what I posted.
As for wine, it was referenced by Dr. Bannister, Dr. Seifert, Dr. Brown, Dr. Teare, and Dr. Thurston, as well as Monika telling both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day that Jimi. There is no blather that can be posted by Jason or Sister Ivana Sow that can change or get around this fact.
Correction — *on the day Jimi died. Typo error. No big deal.
Jason and I are the only thinkers here. We don’t fall for obsolete and fantastical scenarios like you hoaxers do. We stick to the facts and place out trust in the right people instead of the untrustworthy ones like you love and believe in so much. We can see a fantasy scenario coming from a mile off something you seem to be unable to detect. We can sift through the nonsense easily and always come up trumps. We would never place our faith and trust in Tappy Wright, Dr. Bannister or Albert Allen like you so easily have. You have never posted anything remotely trustworthy or credible; just the fact that you have believed in a murder that never took place says that you are unable to distinguish fact from fantasy and must not be trusted to make rational judgements. You have disparaged all the credible witnessing that morning and created a fairytale of events that never took place. Tappy Wright’s book has been discredited as a complete fake yet you are still hanging onto the waterboarding scenario even though this did not exist before the release of this book. Kathy’s investigation revealed that the delay in calling the ambulance contributed to Jimi’s death significantly; it did not reveal that Jimi was murdered. Kathy has never bought into this myth but you are still clinging onto it. Isn’t the wine the important factor here like you have been saying all along yet you are just nit picking when you are focusing on the colour of the vomit.I can’t help thinking that there is something seriously wrong with your thought processes and your obvious lack of insight-believing in a murder that never took place. Jason and I are rational and not suspicious beings. Just read our postings. Yours are anything but as I always have a good laugh when I read them. Excellent material for any would be comedian.
Thanks for destroying your phony hoax with my quotes. You still haven’t found any wine.
Tappy Wright an admitted liar……great witness.
No wine drowning, wine removal, “hard plug of vomit” removal is documented on Hendrix’s medical record.
Why?
It never happened.
Hi Jason. Our friend Buster has brought in a new person Dr. Hunter. Funny how Buster believes Dr. Hunter who was not present at Jimi’s autopsy over Dr. Teare who actually performed the autopsy. Does the actual cause of Jimi’s death change because the nurses or Dr. Bannister were not interviewed no it doesn’t as it was very clear with the results of the autopsy what actually caused Jimi’s death. Buster is deliberately throwing a spanner in the works by introducing irrelevant details into the mix. Scotland Yard, I think, avoided interviewing Wright and Bannister because of their dubious reputations and they would not have wasted their time on people who produce fictitious accounts. Jimi died by suffocating on his own vomit due to the toxic level of barbiturate in his system; the autopsy revealed all of that. If that amount of wine caused Jimi’s death then this would have been obvious to the coroner. The waterboarding scenario was introduced by Wright in his book which has been revealed to be a hoax this did not exist in the 70’s so it’s fair to say this whole thing is a scam which some gullible people have fallen for line hook and sinker. Buster has not let go of this despite Wright’s stupid book and I’m sure if Wright’s book was never published Buster would not have pursued this line of thinking and neither would he have given any credibility to what Bannister said in the 90’s decades after Jimi died.
Buster believes anybody who pushes his hoax.
Hi Ivana,
Today is the 31st of October Halloween. Do you think Buster and Flysquatter will dress up masquerading as credible Hendrix research “authorities” pretending to be knowledgeable as they go trick or treating?
Hi Jason, These two don’t need a costume all they need to do is show up as themselves that would be enough to scare anyone. I even know what they’ll be given – red wine. BOO!
Ten Reason Why Buster Has Already Lost His Phony Hendrix Murder Claim
1. Buster has no “murderer” to claim. Michael Jeffery his alleged suspect was in Spain the morning of 9/18/70.
2. No wine was ever witnessed at the Hendrix death by the ambulance men, police men, coroner’s officers.
3. Buster claims a “forced fed pill and wine drowning” killed Hendrix. No signs of forced trauma was ever documented on Hendrix which would be present in a “forced fed pill and wine drowning”.
4. Buster claims a phony “hard plug of vomit” prevented the ambulance men from witnessing the imaginary wine below. No ambulance men ever witnessed a “hard plug of vomit” and neither did Fraud Bannister. No medical record of Jimi Hendrix ever documents a “hard plug of vomit” removal procedure ever being performed. This procedure would have to be documented by law.
5. Buster’s own phony forensic timeline is based on a the real drug overdose evidence and not his phony “wine drowning”. Buster purposely omits the “black bomber” that killed Hendrix from his phony timeline as he falsely claims Jimi had a “famous tolerance to drugs” and the 9 Vesparax tablets could not kill him. A “black bomber” mixed with 9 Vesparax certainly did.
6. Buster believes Jimi Hendrix, a 6 hour long dead corpse, could be “brought back to life” with “strange experimental procedures” performed by Fraud Bannister.
7. Buster disclaims all the solid factual evidence and testimony that refutes his bogus claims. Buster becomes angry as he claims there is a “cover up” and he spoke to “someone” off the record pretending to discredit all the evidence stacked against him.
8. Buster can’t produce any real medical documented evidence that proves anything he claims. No medical record of Jimi Hendrix states any of the lies that Buster claims. Buster only has lies, false stories, and phony claims to tell.
9. Doctors don’t perform weird “medical procedures on a 6 hour long dead Hendrix corpse” pretending to “save him” and then dump out bodily fluids down the drain since that is illegal tampering with a dead body.
10. Dr. Siefert and Dr. Brown said there was never any “procedures performed on Hendrix as he was already a dead corpse and no revival was possible. Doctor Bob Brown confirmed Hendrix died from a drug overdose and an inhalation of vomit just like Dr. Teare and Dr. Thurston finalized forever in Jimi Hendrix’s autopsy and autopsy report. The results are forever etched in stone and can never be refuted.
We all know Buster is a pathological liar who changes his fake stories every chance he gets so he can claim he won a “debate”. Here are more fine examples how this fraud changes his fake stories. All of Buster’s lies have come back to haunt him on Halloween.
BUSTER says: Doctor Bannister specifically said that after he unplugged a cork of vomit from Jimi’s windpipe he then suctioned “bottles worth” of wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach.
BUSTER says: Bannister never saw the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat because Siefert and the nurses removed it before he got to the scene…
JASON says: Here is another blatant lie by this pathological liar
First Buster was telling us Banister removed the plug of vomit himself and suctioned wine himself.
Now Buster is lying claiming Bannister never saw the plug of vomit telling us Siefert removed it with the nurses first.
So Buster, did Bannister remove the plug of vomit or not? Which is it? You can’t have it both ways.
The ghosts of Halloween have come back to haunt Buster the clown as he engages in more pathological lies.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying when he says Bannister removed the vomit…I spoke to Bannister and he told me Siefert had gotten there first and removed the plug of vomit…By the time Bannister arrived the wine was visible in the throat and was no longer blocked…
BUSTER says: Doctor Bannister specifically said that after he unplugged a cork of vomit from Jimi’s windpipe he then suctioned “bottles worth” of wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach.
No you hoaxing fraud I am not lying, since we have you on record stating Bannister removed the vomit.
Now Buster said he “spoke to Bannister” and Bannister told him that Siefert got there first to remove the vomit.
Before Buster was telling us he “spoke to Bannister” and Bannister told him he removed the vomit and wine himself.
So Buster, which lie are you going to go with, Bannister removing the vomit himself or did Siefert do it first? Which is it? You can’t have it both ways.
The truth is Buster the clown claimed he “spoke with Bannister” and is making up two very different lies. Buster the clown is a pathological liar and makes up “private conversations” he claims for his fake evidence.
The fact is Buster always said that Bannister removed the vomit himself. After Part 2 of my Bannister series, Buster lied changing his story to Siefert removing the vomit. This tells us Buster the clown never spoke to anyone and is lying for his fake evidence he claims. Also, there was never a “hard plug of vomit” anyway and Bannister never talked about a “plug of vomit” on the offical record. Buster is a lying fraud and his lies came back to haunt him today on Halloween. BOO!
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
October 29, 2019 at 10:51 pm
Dr. Martin Siefert already told us in his testimony to Kathy Etchingham that no procedures were ever done on Hendrix. Doctor Bob Brown confirmed that as well in his interviews that “no revival was possible”. This is documented witness testimony.”
This is NOT documented testimony. This is Jason employing his usual lying misquotes & self-decreed fabrications out of his ass.
Neither Dr. Seifert or Dr. Brown have ever stated that no treatments were done. There are NO reference sources to be found anywhere to confirm this because they do NOT exist. Jason is making this up.
Jason is a blatant liar & Jason stupidly thinks that he can milk a cow with his lie about Seifert & Dr. Brown saying “no treatments were done’, but Jason is too stupid to realize that he’s trying to milk a bull by pulling on the bull’s genitals with this lie.
Flysquatter ignoramus extraordinaire isn’t intelligent enough to understand that Dr. Martin Siefert’s words are documented and he gave testimony to Kathy Etchingham.
These two wine clown jokers Bluster and Flysquatter don’t seem to realize how stupid they look trying to argue against the facts and documented testimony that forever refutes their phony claims.
Once again, here is Dr. Martin Siefert and Dr. Bob Brown telling us no procedures were performed on Hendrix. These two wine clown can’t produce any evidence to prove their phony claims.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.”- Dr Martin Siefert
“The man had been dead some time. The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
Medical procedures are not allowed to be performed on a 6 hour long dead corpse to “bring it back to life”. Only in the psychotic minds of wine hoaxers would they think it would be possible.
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, cannot answer to the fact that the hospital report states that the time of treatment was from 11:45AM to 12;15PM and this same time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book “Inside the Experience”.
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, has already been told that if “no work” was done on Jimi, then he would have been declared dead much sooner than 12:15PM
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, talks about “reading comprehension”, but then Jason illustrates his own illiteracy by quoting Seifert as saying “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room” & then Jason turns around and tries to tell us “no procedures were done”. Does Jason even read his own lying blather? If no procedures were done, then Jimi would never have been taken into the re-sus room to begin with, STUPID.
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, has already had it pointed to him by Buster, that the medical team had no idea how long this John Doe casualty has been in the state he was in when he arrived at St. Mary Abbots.
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, keeps trying to con himself into thinking that the quotes he posts of both Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown indicate no treatment was done, when they only indicate that Jimi could not be saved. Those quotes are not saying that they didn’t try that no treatment was done. The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” and no matter how much Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, it does not change or alter that fact that a resuscitation attempt was made and treatment was done for 30 minutes from 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Those are the documented facts that Jason’s lying misquotes can’t get around.
Not only do we have Jason’s lying hoaxes claiming Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown “confirming no treatments were ever done”, we also have multiple instances of Jason claiming the ambulance men saw “brown vomit only” and here are those instances.
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 9:03 pm
The ambulance men never witnessed “pure spilled wine” on the bed and pillows like your hoaxing clown Buster claimed. They only witnessed brown vomit.
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 6:55 pm
Red wine would be obvious to the ambulance men soaking the bed and pillows. They witnessed no red wine on the pillows. Just brown vomit. Buster has been refuted.
Red wine would be obvious soaking Jimi in a physical wine drowning. The ambulance men only witnessed brown vomit. Buster has been refuted.
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:53 pm
Buster the wine hoaxer claimed “pure red wine” was spilled and poured all over the bed, pillows, and on Jimi. That’s not what the ambulance men witnessed with only brown vomit on the pillows.
JASON says:
October 16, 2019 at 8:27 pm
They only saw brown vomit on Hendrix and inside the room
JASON says:
October 18, 2019 at 1:57 pm
The ambulance men never witnessed “pure wine on the bed”. They only saw brown vomit.
JASON says:
October 18, 2019 at 2:26 pm
Nobody at the flat witnessed massive amounts of pure wine They only saw brown vomit on the pillows.
JASON says:
October 18, 2019 at 4:26 pm
There only was brown vomit from the reaction to the high number of pills ingested. No “pure red wine” was ever witnessed.
JASON says:
October 20, 2019 at 2:52 am
We already know Buster lied when he said “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed. That was never witnessed. So, that means the ambulance men were correct when they said only brown vomit. John Saua and Reginal Jones never said wine cuz they never witnessed any wine.
JASON says:
October 20, 2019 at 2:57 am
They gave a perfect and very graphically detailed description of the brown vomit they witnessed and “wine” was never ever mentioned
JASON says:
October 20, 2019 at 3:49 am
Jones talks about brown vomit on the pillows and Saua talks about dry vomit in Hendrix. Nothing about wine flooding in Hendrix’s mouth and throat or soaked on his body.
**********************************************************************************
COUNT THEM — 10 instances, but let’s cross-check those 10 instances versus what Reg Jones really said to Kathy, which is copied and pasted exactly from Chapter 11 of Kathy’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”:
** Once we got settled, Reg told us his story. ‘When we got to the flat the door was wide open. The body was on the bed, covered in vomit of all colours, black, brown; all over him, all over the pillow. There wasn’t another soul in sight. I went back to the ambulance, thinking he was dead and that the circumstances were strange. A couple of young policemen turned up and they told us to take him to the hospital.’ ‘Is that the normal procedure?’ I asked. ‘No. Strictly speaking they shouldn’t have done that but they didn’t want to have to spend the whole afternoon filling in forms. We helped them out by taking the deceased to the casualty department. None of us realized it was Jimi Hendrix until we read it in the newspapers later that day.’ What the policemen should have done if they found a dead body was to call in the CID, but as far as they were concerned he was just another dead junkie in Notting Hill. Had Jimi been in the Cumberland Hotel where everyone knew who he was, it would have been a different story. **
Did you notice that Reg Jones told Kathy specifically “The body was on the bed, covered in vomit of all colours, black, brown; all over him, all over the pillow.” and NEVER said “brown only” as we have seen Jason falsely claim 10 (TEN) TIMES ??
“JASON says:
October 17, 2019 at 11:46 pm
The ambulance men refuted everything Buster has said.”
ANYBODY can see that Reg Jones is refuting what Jason has been repeatedly claiming.
“JASON the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
October 31, 2019 at 12:08 am
Thanks for destroying your phony hoax with my quotes. You still haven’t found any wine.”
Wine was referenced by Dr. Bannister, Dr. Seifert, Dr. Brown, Dr. Teare, and Dr. Thurston, as well as Monika telling both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day that Jimi. There is no blather that can be posted by Jason or Sister Ivana Sow that can change or get around this fact.
Keep wallowing away, Jason.
Flysquatter keeps destroying his own phony wine claim proving no wine was witnessed at the flat. This moron reads a book believing in second hand information when both ambulance men and a police man gave first hand testimony of never witnessing any wine. Wallow away in imaginary wine you wine troll.
No procedures were performed on Jimi Hendrix. Hospitals do not work on a 6 hour long dead corpse.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.”- Dr Martin Siefert
“The man had been dead some time. The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
“No point in doing anything else” and “no revival possible” means that no procedures were done.
All the readers nod their heads in agreement while Bluster and Flysquatter still pathetically try to defend their already destroyed wine hoax. We all sit back and laugh at these two jokers.
And again………..
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, cannot answer to the fact that the hospital report states that the time of treatment was from 11:45AM to 12;15PM and this same time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book “Inside the Experience”.
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, has already been told that if “no work” was done on Jimi, then he would have been declared dead much sooner than 12:15PM
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, talks about “reading comprehension”, but then Jason illustrates his own illiteracy by quoting Seifert as saying “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room” & then Jason turns around and tries to tell us “no procedures were done”. Does Jason even read his own lying blather? If no procedures were done, then Jimi would never have been taken into the re-sus room to begin with, STUPID.
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, has already had it pointed to him by Buster, that the medical team had no idea how long this John Doe casualty has been in the state he was in when he arrived at St. Mary Abbots.
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, keeps trying to con himself into thinking that the quotes he posts of both Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown indicate no treatment was done, when they only indicate that Jimi could not be saved. Those quotes are not saying that they didn’t try that no treatment was done. The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” and no matter how much Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, it does not change or alter that fact that a resuscitation attempt was made and treatment was done for 30 minutes from 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Those are the documented facts that Jason’s lying misquotes can’t get around.
If there were no wine, then what would make Dr. Brown make Jimi had anything to drink & why would Dr. Teare make an estimate 100mg blood alcohol content at time of Vesperax ingestion?
Wine was referenced by Dr. Bannister, Dr. Seifert, Dr. Brown, Dr. Teare, and Dr. Thurston, as well as Monika telling both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day that Jimi died. There is no blather that can be posted by Jason or Sister Ivana Sow that can change or get around this fact.
And yet, anyone can see Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder just keep wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, with hi statement of “destroying his own phony wine claim proving no wine was witnessed at the flat”
Flysquatter the troll copies and pastes the same garbage.
He was already told Dr. Bob Brown was citing Dr. Teare’s autopsy results that proved Jimi was over the legal limit of alcohol.
He was already told that Sharon Lawrence made up the fake Thurston quote in her fiction book. Thurston is never on record talking about wine.
He was already told that no procedures were ever done on Hendrix.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.”- Dr Martin Siefert
“The man had been dead some time. The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
This wine troll desperately still clings to his dead wine hoax.
Hilarious!
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
October 31, 2019 at 7:31 pm
Flysquatter the troll copies and pastes the same garbage.”
Well, good. I’ll be happy to oblige Jason with many more, because all Jason is telling anyone is that he can’t stomach things being repeated to him that he can’t honestly answer or provide any credible references to refute it.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
October 31, 2019 at 7:31 pm
He was already told Dr. Bob Brown was citing Dr. Teare’s autopsy results that proved Jimi was over the legal limit of alcohol.”
And lying-denying Jason has been told & shown there is major problems with Jason’s self decreed fabrication that he pulls out of his ass regarding “Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.”
1) If Dr. Brown were really citing the autopsy, as Jason falsely claims, then wouldn’t Dr. Brown know that what Dr. Teare was saying about the 100mg was only an ESTIMATE of BAC at the time of Vesperax ingestion? Why of course, Dr. Brown would know that, as Dr. Teare told this to the Inquest and wrote it down in his report.
So with Dr. Brown knowing that the 100mg of BAC was just an estimate, then how can Dr. Brown be referencing that as “bit’ too much to drink”, as Jason falsely claims?
ANSWER: Dr. Brown wasn’t citing the autopsy when he stated that Jimi “had a bit too much to drink” — he telling about what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at the hospital and Jason is just a blatant liar that is making up that fabrication.
2) If Dr. Brown were really citing the autopsy, as Jason falsely claims, then wouldn’t Dr. Brown know that the autopsy stated that Jimi’s REAL blood alcohol content was .005%?
Why of course, Dr. Brown would know that, as it’s written in the autopsy.
Which leads to the obvious question — how could those two parameters ( 100mg ESTIMATE of BAC at the time of Vesperax ingestion & REAL blood alcohol content that was .005%) be referenced by ANYBODY — let alone a certified doctor like Dr. Bob Brown — as being “a bit too much to drink”?
ANSWER: It PROVES that Dr. Brown wasn’t referencing the autopsy report and Jason is just a blatant liar pulling that self-decreed fabrication out of his ass. Dr. Brown was citing what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at the hospital and Jason can’t provide any proof otherwise & the question of “what would make Dr Brown think that Jimi had a bit too much to drink?” remains unanswered by Jason.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
October 31, 2019 at 7:31 pm
He was already told that Sharon Lawrence made up the fake Thurston quote in her fiction book. Thurston is never on record talking about wine.”
Told by whom? Jason? Argument invalid, right there. Just wishful thinking by Jason. Sharon gave an exact date (Sept 29, 1970) of the quote that Meehan got from Thurston. Jason’s self-decrees & fabrications, along with his lying misquotes, that he pulls out of his ass have been exposed in abundance. And yet, Jason is still stupid enough to think that his self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass automatically over-rule any testimony given by people that were there at that time.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
October 31, 2019 at 7:31 pm
He was already told that no procedures were ever done on Hendrix.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.”- Dr Martin Siefert
“The man had been dead some time. The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown”
No one has stated that “no procedures were ever done on Hendrix”, except Jason. Dr. Seifert and Dr. Dr. Brown are NOT saying that “no procedures were ever done” — they are saying that Jimi could not be saved because they had discovered upon close examination & during the half-hour treatment that he had been dead for some time prior to arriving to St. Mary Abbots.
Since Jason is so fond of copy & paste jobs, here’s another one for him:
** JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, talks about “reading comprehension”, but then Jason illustrates his own illiteracy by quoting Seifert as saying “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room” & then Jason turns around and tries to tell us “no procedures were done”. Does Jason even read his own lying blather? If no procedures were done, then Jimi would never have been taken into the re-sus room to begin with, STUPID.
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, has already had it pointed to him by Buster, that the medical team had no idea how long this John Doe casualty has been in the state he was in when he arrived at St. Mary Abbots.
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, keeps trying to con himself into thinking that the quotes he posts of both Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown indicate no treatment was done, when they only indicate that Jimi could not be saved. Those quotes are NOT saying that they didn’t try to save Jimi & that no treatment was done.
The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” and no matter how much Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, it does not change or alter that fact that a resuscitation attempt was made and treatment was done for 30 minutes from 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Those are the documented facts that Jason’s lying misquotes can’t get around. This 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book ‘Inside the Experience”, published in 1990, and that info was most likely gotten from the hospital report. **
Jason desperately clings to his “no wine” and “no treatment” hoaxes, but what is hilarious is that it is easily refuted by documentation that anyone can find. But, of course, Jason never makes reference to it because it shoots down his self-decreed fabrications & lying misquotes that Jason repeatedly pulls out of his ass.
Jason’s response above is the kind of response you get from an out-argued troll…You’ll notice he doesn’t quote me saying Bannister removed the vomit because I never said that…Jason needs to lie and put words in to people’s mouths that they never said because he’s trying to screw up the debate because he can’t directly answer what was said…I spoke to Dr Bannister and he told me Siefert was there slightly ahead of him and had removed the plug of vomit…By the time Dr Bannister arrived he saw the wine up to the throat and both him and Siefert started suctioning it and it took them 20 minutes to do so…
Dr Siefert was not telling the full truth…He was using deceptive legal speak to avoid committing to anything, as persons taking a defensive position will do…You have to realize Jimi was a famous person and a big property so in the age of malpractice lawsuits Siefert was aware of the potential of what he really witnessed…He was aware that pouring the wine down the drain was against medical evidence procedures and he was in charge…So was Scotland Yard so they deliberately avoided pursuing the path of Bannister, Siefert, and the nurses because they knew what lay at the end of that path because they were fully aware Jeffery murdered Jimi and they were acting as a guilty party…
In any case the trolling nut Jason is trying to make us chase him in to the rabbit hole of one of his crazy lies and is bailing himself out of not giving any credible answer to why Scotland Yard didn’t interview the nurses…If Scotland Yard really believed Siefert they could have found those nurses in an afternoon and gotten them to say there was no wine removal and Siefert only worked on Jimi for a few minutes (a half hour can be said to be a “few minutes” depending on your interpretation)…The reason Scotland Yard avoided finding and interviewing the nurses is because they knew they would confirm a 20 minute wine removal and fully vindicate the troll-plagued Dr Bannister who has been falsely accused for his heroic stepping forward while the real crook here, Siefert, went unconfronted…As anyone can see, when directly confronted by this Jason is only able to give demented trolling as a response and cannot back up his words when called on it…
The problem here is that Kathy Etchingham was of the personal inclination that she only wanted to go after Monika…She went no further than that so she failed to venture in to the most important evidence and failed to push it like it merited…Kathy was fully inspired to go after Monika but stopped dead when the evidence path led to the authorities…A real tragedy happened here thanks to the rotten scumbag Caesar Glebbeek who had the key evidence to prove murder in his hands in time to pass it to Etchingham but did the opposite and buried it…Kathy also did not possess the personal inclination or ability to properly prosecute Dr Bannister’s admission in a timely and effective way…It is absolutely tragic that the information about the wine got to Kathy in time for her to press it and demand Scotland Yard pursue it and interview all involved in regard to it…Instead it was quietly ignored and Scotland Yard was allowed to judge its own actions and of course they ruled in their favor…They also lied and said there was no new evidence when in fact there was incredible new evidence that proved murder…
Buster is a pathological liar for two reasons.
1. Buster’s original fantasy story had Bannister doing everything. We have Buster on record telling us this. After the first 2 parts of my Bannister series, Buster changes his script pushing all the blame on Siefert. Buster now has Siefert doing all the work. This is bogus cuz Bannister always takes the credit himself in all his public interviews and never mentioned Siefert or a “hard plug of vomit”. Buster now gives us his new fake version of Siefert after Buster gave Bannister all the credit originally. Buster has switched his script on us which proves this a hoax. Real events never change.
2. This “wine removal” and “hard plug of vomit” removal is a scam. It was never witnessed by the ambulance men who saw Hendrix dead first. There is no record of any these so called procedures listed on Hendrix’s medical file. The law and hospitals require everything to be documented. No procedures exist on Hendrix’s medical record and these hoaxers have no answer for it, they only have lame excuses. Hospitals don’t do strange procedures on a 6 hour long dead corpse awaiting an autopsy which would destroy the autopsy results. There was no “wine dumped down the drain” cuz no doctor would be allowed to remove anything from a dead body. This is all a hoax.
Dr. Martin Siefert gave documented testimony that no procedures were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix cuz he was already dead. We all know his testimony.
Dr. Bob Brown confirmed that by stating Hendrix died from an overdose who was already dead for hours, so no revival was possible.
Ex Doctor Bannister clearly stated that Hendrix was dead for hours. So, his claims of “working hard” on a 6 hour long dead corpse is bogus.
We have Buster lying again when we have his exact words changing his fake stories again. Each phony story he uses he changes his phony stories to a new one after the original has been debunked. These are your own lies and words Buster, you can’t run and hide from them. All the ghosts, spooks, ghouls, and gobblins have come to haunt you on Halloween. Your lies are clearly displayed below how you change your fake stories.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying when he says Bannister removed the vomit…I spoke to Bannister and he told me Siefert had gotten there first and removed the plug of vomit…By the time Bannister arrived the wine was visible in the throat and was no longer blocked…
BUSTER says: Doctor Bannister specifically said that after he unplugged a cork of vomit from Jimi’s windpipe he then suctioned “bottles worth” of wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach.
1) Jason is just a sick internet troll who happened to find this thread…He has no background or credibility in the subject and is just thinking of any obnoxious reason to deny the murder evidence…He learned about it for the first time from this thread…I would like to find out who Jason is for future actions against him to hold him accountable for the criminal activity he perpetrates on this board…What Jason is trying to do with his word games is avoid honestly answering that Dr Seifert got to Jimi first and removed the hard plug of vomit in his throat…Bannister arrived shortly after and saw the wine flooding up to Jimi’s larynx…Both Siefert and Bannister spent the next 20 minutes suctioning the wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach…When done they spend 10 minutes trying to ventilate Jimi…This is entered as “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15” on the Hospital Report…Jason can’t honestly answer this so he trolls that I didn’t get my story right instead of honestly answering the truthful account that was posted…If Bannister didn’t mention Siefert publicly it was because he didn’t want to involve him…He did mention him to me…Jason is not too bright because the nurses could have confirmed it…
2) Jason ignores everything that was written for months now and repeats that the ambulance men did not see the hard plug of vomit…Even though their very words that Jason quoted speak of vomit they could not clear…And even though Jason knows that because the ambulance men did not clear that vomit, and therefore they had no way of seeing the wine that was trapped behind it, Jason once again repeats that the ambulance men saw no wine inside Jimi…We know the wine removal occurred at the hospital…The ambulance men never went inside the hospital so they would have no way to see the wine removal, but Jason suggests it anyway because Jason is a sick motherfucker whose purpose is to enter any kind of crazy bullshit to screw up the discussion…Jimi’s Hospital Report simply listed “asphyxiation on vomit”, so it did list the wine Jimi was drowned in, only, like the ambulance men, it called the wine “vomit”…And Dr Thurston was somehow told of Jimi’s stomach full of wine…So what Jason says isn’t true…Even though Siefert and Bannister had no way to know how long Jimi was dead Jason once again dishonestly suggests they knew Jimi was dead for 6 hours…Jason knows they had no way to know how long Jimi was dead, but he enters that they knew he was dead for 6 hours anyway…We know there was wine dumped down the drain because the doctor who did it (Bannister told me it was actually the nurses who handled that chore) told me so himself…Keep in mind Dr Bannister was the doctor who was there and witnessed it in person and Jason is just sick trolling internet scum who gets his rocks off on attacking terribly victimized celebrities and working for Satan…We know there was wine disposed of at St Mary’s because Scotland Yard avoided interviewing the nurses who would have confirmed it…
Jason is cherry-picking words dishonestly to get around the facts he’s aware of…It’s obvious from his pathetically lame trolling style that isn’t fooling anyone…Jason lied when he said there was no documentation of any procedures being done on Jimi…The Inquest offered a document that was posted in this thread that said “Unable To Resuscitate”…That means the resuscitation Bannister spoke of was documented in the hospital records…Jason is a sick motherfucker who lies about things that were already shown in the thread…Sorry Jason but “Unable To Resuscitate” when combined with “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15” means you are proven to be a lying piece of shit who ignores evidence and is crazy enough to keep lying in front of evidence that has already disproven him…
It was Siefert who unplugged the cork of vomit from Jimi’s throat…If I said Bannister I misspoke and meant Siefert…This could all be settled by simply speaking to Dr Bannister and asking him to repeat what he told me…He told me Siefert got there first and by the time he arrived all he saw was wine up to the throat…What Jason is dishonestly not answering is that Dr Bannister’s story has never changed…The reason Jason is a lying piece of shit is because he suggests changes in story is a sign of untruth, but he doesn’t extend that to Dr Bannister whose story never changed one iota all the times he told it…So while pretending he is sensitive to perfect accuracy or changes in story Jason totally ignores that we have Dr Siefert on record as saying “Jimi was covered in wine” and “I detected no alcohol on Mr Hendrix” while talking about the same event…Apparently Jason’s pretend sensitivity to perfect accuracy didn’t extend as far as Dr Siefert who is clearly the liar here…
I’d like to find out who Jason is because we have a date in the future in holding him accountable for what he does here…I need to find out who he is and need to make sure he is held accountable for what he types here…There are works that are to come out on this that will absolutely destroy Jason and what he contends here and will provide the documentation he calls for…I am sure that if we could identify Jason you would see he is exactly what appears as and is some sick miscreant weasel with a keyboard who likes attacking victims by means of demented trolling and that he and his offerings are not to be taken seriously (which should already be obvious)…Jason and this thread were recommended by British murder denier Jim Hawthorn…
Buster the clown doesn’t get it. Of course I ignore all the crap he writes cuz it’s all bullshit. Nothing he has ever written is the truth. It is all fantasy and make believe but he pretends to be an “authority” as he spins his phony tales.
Your threats are pathetic. You have made false murder allegations which is criminal. You also accuse top pathologists and doctors of being on a cover up making fraudulent charges.
The only one who needs to be held accountable is you for your decade long hoax of perpetrating a fraud. You need serious mental help. You are shown evidence and forensics that disprove your phony claims and you still push your hoax.
You have no evidence for your claims and no medical record exists for any wine removal or hard plug of vomit removal. You are a Hoaxer and a pathological liar. You have been exposed.
All your lies have come back to haunt you tonight on Halloween.
Boo!
When thoroughly out-argued Jason exposes himself as the garden variety internet troll he is…Because I demolished him in my last reply he resorted to cheap trash-talk, which is the real basis of most of what he types…All Jason is telling us is that he can’t back up his stuff when called out on it with the facts…
Jason isn’t ignoring my points because they are bullshit…He’s ignoring them because they are proof and he can’t answer them…There’s a fine difference between saying someone is lying and presenting false claims and actually showing that vs the material…If you look at Jason’s posts they are mostly childish accusations and taunts….My posts have firm substance and intelligently explained facts, arguments, and evidence…There’s no comparison…Jason is just a sick creep who enjoys trolling people who are stupid enough to answer him and that is as far as his credibility goes…
Jason is lying when he says we have shown no documentation for the wine removal…When I showed evidence for Jimi having a procedure done on him at St Mary’s this trolling asshole Jason ignored it…Jason lied and said no procedure was done on Jimi at St Mary’s…When I showed the entry on the Inquest record sheet that said “Unable To Resuscitate” Jason ignored it…So Jason calls for proof but then ignores it like a trolling asshole when shown…”Unable To Resuscitate” means in plain language that they tried to resuscitate…And trying to resuscitate means they did a procedure…We then go to the Hospital Report and it said “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15″…So that means contrary to Jason’s trolling lie that, yes, indeed there actually is documentation for the wine removal…That failed resuscitation attempt took a half hour that was written in plain language on the Hospital Report…Jason is lying…The documentation for the wine removal did exist and when shown Jason ignored it like the sick troll he is…
There’s the evidence Jason called for and like the kiddie troll nut he is he trolled it instead of honestly acknowledging it…
I’ve answered and debunked every phony claim Buster the clown has posted and he knows it. That’s why he is now forced to change his phony stories and play word games. That’s fine with me. Whatever nonsense this joker puts forth I will easily debunk since he only has fake contradicting claims. He still refuses to answer who “murdered” Jimi Hendrix and produce any medical documents of wine removal or wine as a cause of death. His usual half hour posted times is not documented evidence stating wine was a cause of death. No wine ever existed and Buster knows it.
More fantasy coming from Buster. This is not fact it is just what Buster thinks and his version of the truth. If you are susceptible to this scenario then you will embrace it. Buster writes his posts as if he knows the real truth in order to draw the reader in but in fact it’s all made up nonsense. How exactly is he coming across this type of information who are his sources; this is just a piece of fictional writing masquerading as the truth. We know it’s false because the supposed murderer Michael Jeffrey was in Spain and the book all of this murder nonsense came from was admittedly a hoax. But Buster still believes there was a massive cover up anyway. This is the typical suspicious mindset of a tin foil hatter and it’s all driven by this mindset. Jimi’s death from the Vesparax was very real but hoaxers like Buster like to see themselves as amateur sleuths who invent scenarios that are fundamentally flawed. How could Buster really know any of this really as it happened in 1970. He is just drawing his own conclusions from what he has read but presenting it as fact. Reader beware.
More of Sister Ivana Sow sitting in her mommy’s basement picking her own false scenarios out of her ass with her toothbrush. That’s all her posts amount to.
And both Sister Ivana Sow & her mommy are both so fat & ugly that they both use a washing machine for a vibrator.
Hey Ivana,
Flysquatter is telling us what he does every night. Shouldn’t he be getting ready for his trick or treating for imaginary wine and hard plugs of vomit?
All the readers can see that Flysquatter is just a troll with his pathetic posts. His Phony wine hoax has been destroyed and this is all he is left to come up with as a rebuttal.
Hilarious!
Quite the contrary. I’ve described exactly what Jason and Ivana do.
They both speak of Halloween & Trick or Treat, but both Jason and Ivana could go to their closest medical clinics and both of them (Jason and Ivana) could apply for a job as a bedpan, because as much shit as they are both full of & with their IQ equivalent — Jason and Ivana couldn’t miss being hired as a bedpan & no Halloween costumes needed.
What Buster needs is a gullible fool like Flysquatter by his side. The extent of his contributions are stupid immature insults aimed at Jason and myself which just make me laugh out loud. Did you enjoy your five bottles of imaginary wine drunk out of five imaginary glasses poured by Dr. Bannister while sitting at the Samarkand Hotel on Halloween. BOO!
Do Ivana and her momma enjoy having the Maytag label permanently stuck inside their crotches?
Well tonight is Halloween, and the phony story the wine hoaxers tell us sounds like something coming out of a decades old B horror movie that most people would find too far fetched to even watch. That makes their phony Hendrix murder caper even worse.
To start with we have a “brutal wine drowning” wine hoaxers claim was done by Hendrix manager Michael Jeffery who was confirmed to be in Spain so the hoaxers lose their suspect. Then they claim he “arranged it” on short notice but still no suspects are ever named. They also claim mobsters, black panthers, MI5 or MI6 depending on who they claim, Mitch Mitchell, Eric Burdon, even Monika Dannemann was all in this caper as accomplices. One of the worst scripts ever written.
Then we move to the main scene where all this wine was supposed to be but nobody ever witnessed any wine. Wine hoaxers try to tell us that brown vomit means red wine. Yeah, that doesn’t work out too well. Then the hoaxers tell us John Saua and and Reginal Jones “witness a hard plug of vomit” that they never testified to and decided to rush Jimi Hendrix who was already a 6 hour long dead corpse to the hospital to have a fake “hard plug of vomit” removed as a “life saving procedure”. Doesn’t this sound asinine?
Could you imagine the dialogue going on?
“Reg, would you look at this? My equipment can’t penetrate this hard plug of vomit!”
“Incredible John! We better rush him over to get this removed immediately even though he’s been dead for quite some time.”
After the real testimony of no wine ever witnessed and no hard plug of vomit, and that Jimi choked to death on vomit we get this spectacular story of a vomit covered Jimi magically changing into a wine covered Jimi.
Jimi was taken to the hospital where he was pronunced dead on arrival with no procedures ever done but wine hoaxers give their B horror movie script that gives us a bizarre account of doctors working on a 6 hour dead corpse.
Doctor Fraud Bannister as a Dr Jekyll and Hyde mad doctor decides to do strange Frankenstein procedures on a 6 hour dead corpse looking for a phony “hard plug of vomit” in his laboratory. Bannister reaches deep inside Hendrix’s throat all the way down as far as he can go to rip out this fake plug of vomit. The plug would be hanging off his instrument.
After he is successful with the uncorking, the massive gallons of imaginary wine starts gushing up like a geyser where Bannister shoves his small metal sucker down into Jimi’s throat to extract gallons of imaginary wine into 5 wine bottles. Even though that would take hours to perform, Bannister fills 5 bottles up in record time. Then sneaks over to a sink and dumps Jimi’s bodily fluids down the drain pretending he never did these strange procedures on Jimi’s 6 hour long dead corpse.
Mad Doctor Bannister doesn’t document any “procedures” that he did since he is a mad doctor and has the media and public learn that it was a drug overdose instead.
Then Mad Doctor Bannister tells no one until 1992 about all his mad doctor work he performed in 1970 as a flashback recollection.
What a terrible script written by amateurs that would never have a producer accepting this awful script but yet, wine hoaxers want you to believe this farce of a theory they peddle on the internet.
Science Fiction and make believe fantasy does not exist in the real world.
Happy Halloween everybody!
Hi Jason, This is absolutely priceless. Love the Dr.Jekyll, Hyde and Frankenstein analogy. The way Buster describes precisely what occurred in casualty that morning as it he was there and witnessed everything. Really weird stuff. But it’s Halloween after all.
Buster used to promote his fake stories of Jeffery “murdering Jimi by waterboarding him with wine” but after Buster learned Michael Jeffery was in Spain in 9/18/70, he doesn’t use this fake story anymore but only alludes to it when it fits his phony narrative.
Buster is a fraudulent liar who is just a phony story teller. He tells his story like a narrator peddling his hoax like he was there himself with lies, fantasy, assumptions, and innuendos.
Buster the clown’s fake stories and lies have come back to haunt him tonight on Halloween!
BUSTER says: Jimi was murdered by his manager Michael Jeffery, as Tappy Wright revealed in his book ‘Rock Roadie’.
BUSTER says: Trust me, all the lies Monika told were due to the fact she was aware Jeffery had waterboarded Jimi to death with wine. That’s the simple explanation no one can figure out.
BUSTER says: The reason Monika’s stories blew-up on her and eventually led to her being forced into court to explain them is because she knew Jeffery murdered Jimi.
BUSTER says: Unfortunately, what Sharon Lawrence didn’t understand was Monika was aware Michael Jeffery had waterboarded Jimi to death with wine as he later confessed. That’s why she reacted to Sharon’s question with such anxiety.
BUSTER says: Devon Wilson knew Jeffery murdered Jimi. Devon was hired by Jeffery as an informant in order to keep an eye on Jimi and keep him informed about Jimi’s doings.
JASON says: Sorry Buster the clown, your previous fake stories have been confirmed to be a lie.
Michael Jeffery was in Spain on 9/18/70 so he did not “murder Jimi” by “waterboarding” him with wine. No wine was ever witnessed. You can’t claim a man “killed” Hendrix when he was in another country. You have no “murder suspect” after you’ve been telling lies.
Your phony hoax has been exposed as a fraud yet again with your own lying words.
Devon Wilson was only a groupie and a drug addict and you spin another phony tale for your ridiculous hoax.
Buster the clown is once again on the record telling lies that already has been debunked since Jeffery was in Spain.
So Buster, since Jeffery was in Spain, who “murdered” Jimi Hendrix?
Buster the clown has been caught red handed lying yet again.
Buster’s terrible pathological lies have come back to haunt him tonight on Halloween.
BOO!
Strange how Buster never gets around to answering who murdered Jimi since he knows full well there wasn’t a murderer and what exactly was Jimi doing that warranted close scrutiny by Devon Wilson. In reality Devon was a drug addict and groupie like you said Jason who could never really be trusted with anything. In fact the only status and recognition she had was through her affairs with rock stars. I would hardly think that Jeffrey would entrust her with anything important. What Buster thinks happened that morning is not the same as knowing what happened that morning. It’s all supposition and not fact that’s why he needs to write such boring long winded replies.
Since Jason is so fond of copy & paste jobs………..
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
October 31, 2019 at 7:31 pm
Flysquatter the troll copies and pastes the same garbage.”
Well, good. I’ll be happy to oblige Jason with many more, because all Jason is telling anyone is that he can’t stomach things being repeated to him that he can’t honestly answer or provide any credible references to refute it.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
October 31, 2019 at 7:31 pm
He was already told Dr. Bob Brown was citing Dr. Teare’s autopsy results that proved Jimi was over the legal limit of alcohol.”
And lying-denying Jason has been told & shown there is major problems with Jason’s self decreed fabrication that he pulls out of his ass regarding “Brown was citing the results from Dr. Teare’s official autopsy results.”
1) If Dr. Brown were really citing the autopsy, as Jason falsely claims, then wouldn’t Dr. Brown know that what Dr. Teare was saying about the 100mg was only an ESTIMATE of BAC at the time of Vesperax ingestion? Why of course, Dr. Brown would know that, as Dr. Teare told this to the Inquest and wrote it down in his report.
So with Dr. Brown knowing that the 100mg of BAC was just an estimate, then how can Dr. Brown be referencing that as “bit’ too much to drink”, as Jason falsely claims?
ANSWER: Dr. Brown wasn’t citing the autopsy when he stated that Jimi “had a bit too much to drink” — he telling about what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at the hospital and Jason is just a blatant liar that is making up that fabrication.
2) If Dr. Brown were really citing the autopsy, as Jason falsely claims, then wouldn’t Dr. Brown know that the autopsy stated that Jimi’s REAL blood alcohol content was .005%?
Why of course, Dr. Brown would know that, as it’s written in the autopsy.
Which leads to the obvious question — how could those two parameters ( 100mg ESTIMATE of BAC at the time of Vesperax ingestion & REAL blood alcohol content that was .005%) be referenced by ANYBODY — let alone a certified doctor like Dr. Bob Brown — as being “a bit too much to drink”?
ANSWER: It PROVES that Dr. Brown wasn’t referencing the autopsy report and Jason is just a blatant liar pulling that self-decreed fabrication out of his ass. Dr. Brown was citing what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at the hospital and Jason can’t provide any proof otherwise & the question of “what would make Dr Brown think that Jimi had a bit too much to drink?” remains unanswered by Jason.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
October 31, 2019 at 7:31 pm
He was already told that Sharon Lawrence made up the fake Thurston quote in her fiction book. Thurston is never on record talking about wine.”
Told by whom? Jason? Argument invalid, right there. Just wishful thinking by Jason. Sharon gave an exact date (Sept 29, 1970) of the quote that Meehan got from Thurston. Jason’s self-decrees & fabrications, along with his lying misquotes, that he pulls out of his ass have been exposed in abundance. And yet, Jason is still stupid enough to think that his self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass automatically over-rule any testimony given by people that were there at that time.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
October 31, 2019 at 7:31 pm
He was already told that no procedures were ever done on Hendrix.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.”- Dr Martin Siefert
“The man had been dead some time. The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown”
No one has stated that “no procedures were ever done on Hendrix”, except Jason. Dr. Seifert and Dr. Dr. Brown are NOT saying that “no procedures were ever done” — they are saying that Jimi could not be saved because they had discovered upon close examination & during the half-hour treatment that he had been dead for some time prior to arriving to St. Mary Abbots.
Since Jason is so fond of copy & paste jobs, here’s another one for him:
** JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, talks about “reading comprehension”, but then Jason illustrates his own illiteracy by quoting Seifert as saying “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room” & then Jason turns around and tries to tell us “no procedures were done”. Does Jason even read his own lying blather? If no procedures were done, then Jimi would never have been taken into the re-sus room to begin with, STUPID.
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, has already had it pointed to him by Buster, that the medical team had no idea how long this John Doe casualty has been in the state he was in when he arrived at St. Mary Abbots.
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, keeps trying to con himself into thinking that the quotes he posts of both Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown indicate no treatment was done, when they only indicate that Jimi could not be saved. Those quotes are NOT saying that they didn’t try to save Jimi & that no treatment was done.
The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” and no matter how much Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, it does not change or alter that fact that a resuscitation attempt was made and treatment was done for 30 minutes from 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Those are the documented facts that Jason’s lying misquotes can’t get around. This 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book ‘Inside the Experience”, published in 1990, and that info was most likely gotten from the hospital report. **
Jason desperately clings to his “no wine” and “no treatment” hoaxes, but what is hilarious is that it is easily refuted by documentation that anyone can find. But, of course, Jason never makes reference to it because it shoots down his self-decreed fabrications & lying misquotes that Jason repeatedly pulls out of his ass.
And why not add another copy and past job just for Jason………..
** BUSTER says:
October 31, 2019 at 8:45 pm
When thoroughly out-argued Jason exposes himself as the garden variety internet troll he is…Because I demolished him in my last reply he resorted to cheap trash-talk, which is the real basis of most of what he types…All Jason is telling us is that he can’t back up his stuff when called out on it with the facts…
Jason isn’t ignoring my points because they are bullshit…He’s ignoring them because they are proof and he can’t answer them…There’s a fine difference between saying someone is lying and presenting false claims and actually showing that vs the material…If you look at Jason’s posts they are mostly childish accusations and taunts….My posts have firm substance and intelligently explained facts, arguments, and evidence…There’s no comparison…Jason is just a sick creep who enjoys trolling people who are stupid enough to answer him and that is as far as his credibility goes…
Jason is lying when he says we have shown no documentation for the wine removal…When I showed evidence for Jimi having a procedure done on him at St Mary’s this trolling asshole Jason ignored it…Jason lied and said no procedure was done on Jimi at St Mary’s…When I showed the entry on the Inquest record sheet that said “Unable To Resuscitate” Jason ignored it…So Jason calls for proof but then ignores it like a trolling asshole when shown…”Unable To Resuscitate” means in plain language that they tried to resuscitate…And trying to resuscitate means they did a procedure…We then go to the Hospital Report and it said “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15″…So that means contrary to Jason’s trolling lie that, yes, indeed there actually is documentation for the wine removal…That failed resuscitation attempt took a half hour that was written in plain language on the Hospital Report…Jason is lying…The documentation for the wine removal did exist and when shown Jason ignored it like the sick troll he is…
There’s the evidence Jason called for and like the kiddie troll nut he is he trolled it instead of honestly acknowledging it… **
Correct on all counts, Buster.
And since copy & paste jobs are the order of the day, according to Jason, this one deserves a 2nd look……..
*** “JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
Neither of us two lying-denying pig-breeders (Jason and Sister Ivana Sow) answer any questions that exposes our phony hoax.”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
Neither of us (Jason and Ivana) have any evidence of “no wine” at the flat because nobody has ever stated that there wasn’t wine at the flat, but Monika said there was & 5 doctors also made reference to wine later on, so if the wine was witnessed by three doctors at the hospital, then it had to be witnessed at the Samarkand.”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
We (Jason and Ivana) have no official documented evidence of a “hard plug” of vomit not being removed, as Saua stated he could not get an airway, so the vomit Saua couldn’t get through had to removed at the hospital & the autopsy report never mention anything about vomit being stuck in Jimi’s throat”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
We (Jason and Ivana) can’t claim “treatments” weren’t performed on JImi, because the hospital report states a time of treatment from 11:45AM to 12:15PM and the coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate”, clearly indicating that a resuscitation attempt was made, but failed.”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
We (Jason and Ivana) can’t claim the medical staff didn’t “dispose of the wine”, even if that is illegal, because we weren’t there to witness anything & have no credible documented testimony to prove otherwise (same as with all our other blather)”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
They claim Teare forged the numbers because Teare made an estimation of 100mg that was later proved to be false & he did, in fact, post a 2nd set of barbitural numbers in his autopsy report, leaving any object observers to question why did Teare feel the need to do either. But, as far objective observation goes, everybody knows that we (Jason and Ivana) are too busy wallowing in our own pigshit mire of denial of reality to even consider doing that ”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
I claimed Bob Brown was citing Teare’s results 42 years later when he wasn’t, because I couldn’t answer what made Dr. Brown think Jimi had too much to drink & I also could not answer Flyswatter’s germane points that destroyed this phony theory of ‘Brown citing the autopsy report’ that took me over a week to pull out of my ass.”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
They claim that Jimi wasn’t drunk at Cameron’s party because witnesses that were there at the party said Jimi was in control of his faculties when Jimi left at 3:00AM, but this doesn’t fit with our phony narrative of Dr. Brown witnessing wine Jimi drank at Cameron’s, so we have to lie & say “They claim to know everything Jimi was doing at Kameron’s party when even the guests that were there don’t even know everything he was doing” ”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
All we (Jason and Ivana) provide is an alternate fantasy story while discrediting the real facts claiming it never happened.”
^^ FIXED !!
“JASON says:
October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm
Us lying-denying pig-breeders (Jason and Ivana) think that we can change events that already happened with our self-decreed fabrications & lying misquotes that we repeatedly pull out of our asses (along with having no credible reference sources to back up what we are saying) — but we can’t.”
^^ FIXED !!
See how easy it is to take Jason’s blather and make him look STUPID. ***
BURN, BABY !!
This is absolutely hilarious!
Post another one Flysquatter.
Wine trolls are melting down in rapid pace.
Flysquatter embarrasses himself more and more with his pure ignorance.
Bob Brown gave his comments 42 years after Jimi died citing Teare’s results of Jimi being slightly over the legal limit. Anybody can reference those results. Brown never mentioned a “wine drowning” and said Hendrix inhaled vomit and died of a drug overdose which the offical record states.
No wine was ever found in Jimi’s lungs and Thurston never documented wine anywhere in any legal document. Sharon Lawrence made up fake quotes, numbers, and dates in her fiction book. Sharon Lawrence said Jimi was obsessed with the number 9 and was a dedicated reader of occult books which he swallowed 9 pills in a suicide for the number 9. And this moron Flysquatter believes Sharon Lawrence’s fake Thurston date and fake second hand quote after she writes this bullshit account of Jimi Hendrix with the occult and the number 9. What a total dumbass Flysquatter is. And this is the woman he gets all his information from along with his hoaxing clown pal Bluster. You can’t make this shit up. That’s why we are all laughing our heads off while they troll with their nonsense. It’s pure comedy gold!
Dr. Martin Siefert clearly stated “there was no point in doing anything else cuz he was dead”. That means no procedures were performed. But Flysquatter is a stupid idiot who can’t understand the written English language.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
For the millionth time Siefert tells us no procedures were ever done on Hendrix. Doctors are not allowed to perform medical procedures on a 6 hour long dead corpse awaiting an autopsy. Mitch Mitchell was a great guy but got it wrong as he was not there being Dr. Siefert to know what was really going on.
First of all, nothing could ever be done for a 6 hour long dead corpse. The body is cold, the heart will never pump, the organs permanently shut down, and the brain is dead. And these two idiots think Jimi would be brought back to life.
Second, hospitals and doctors don’t perform weird medical procedures on a 6 hour dead corpse awaiting an autopsy cuz it would destroy the autopsy results. A hospital would face a law suit for tampering with a dead body.
Third, hospitals don’t perform weird medical procedures on a 6 hour long dead corpse and remove bodily fluids and then casually dump it out down the drain. That is illegal destroying medical evidence from a dead body altering a pending autopsy.
No hospital would ever operate in this fashion. The only way Hendrix would have a half hour resuscitation would be if he was still alive needing it. 6 hour long dead corpses don’t get “treatments” they get shipped off to the morgue like was reported back in 1970.
Flysquatter is a moron believing in make believe fairy tales he reads out of books instead of understanding what two doctors have already told him which refutes his nonsense.
Another asinine post from this wine clown as we all sit back and laugh at his pure ignorance.
Don’t look at what this asshole Jason posts…Look at what he ignores or refuses to answer…Jason totally ignored the REELZ Channel ‘Autopsy’ program where Dr Hunter determined Jimi died from Oedemic fluid filling his lungs…Dr Hunter was almost certainly working for US Intel in his medical false witnessing designed to avoid the drowning in wine cause…But at least he confirmed that Jimi did not overdose on the barbiturates like Jason lied…And he confirmed Jimi died from fluid drowning his lungs…He just got the type of fluid wrong…Like Scotland Yard, Hunter never called Dr Bannister to consult him because he knew what he would hear…
Jason says Jimi was a 6 hour-dead body when Dr Bannister treated him…That means Jimi died at 5:30am like Dr Crompton determined…What Jason stupidly doesn’t realize is by admitting Jimi died at 5:30am Jason is admitting Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 or 2 hours…9 Vesparax can’t kill a person with a high tolerance period…But 9 Vesparax especially can’t kill a person with a high tolerance in only 1 or 2 hours…And it can’t cause extreme vomiting either…That hasn’t gone away and Jason still hasn’t answered it…Neither did Dr Hunter – even though that was his job…
The product manufacturer said Lethal Dose was “9 to 10 Tablets”…The Wikipedia Barbiturate page says a person with no tolerance will overdose from 2000mg of the Secobarbital base ingredient of Vesparax…The 9 tablets Jimi took only had 1800mg…So for a person with a notorious tolerance like Jimi there was no chance he would overdose, and no chance that 1800mg dose would cause extreme vomiting only 1 or 2 hours after ingestion…The reason the manufacturer listed Lethal Dose as “9 to 10 Tablets” is because they knew 9 only contained 1800mg of Secobarbital…The 10th tablet would push that over 2000mg and there is the science proving itself…
It is clear who the serious researcher is here and who the annoying nay-say troll is who posts goofy Halloween trolling in response to serious discussion…Jason can’t answer this because it’s proof…It is also why I beat him in this debate long ago…
Buster, proof is not what these two lying bags of worms named Jason and Ivana want. They only want their own falsely constructed scenarios, because they’re too stupid to figure out that if Jimi’s death were really an accidental death from inhalation of vomit due to barbitural intoxication, then it would have been validated right from the get go by the powers that be with all the primary witnesses (all the doctors and the ambulance men) giving their testimonies at the original Inquest.
But such a thing never happened — hence why the coroner wrote “insufficient evidence of circumstances, OPEN VERDICT”, plus none of the doctors (Seifert, Bannister, or Brown ), nor the ambulance men, were allowed to give testimony at the original Inquest. Many that were close to Jimi claimed right from the get-go that all the facts regarding the case did not come out at that time. Tony Brown wrote in his book that the Inquest amounted to nothing more than an “open and shut formality”.
As I said, these two lying assholes (Jason and Ivana) don’t want proof. They only want their own falsely constructed scenarios.
As for Mike Jeffery, his exact whereabouts on Sept. 17, 1970 and at 5:30AM on the morning of Sept 18, 1970 cannot be traced or validated by anyone, so the continued regurgitation of “Jeffery was in Spain” by these two idiots (Jason and Ivana) is ludicrous. Spain is just a two-hour plain ride from England & Jimi was left for dead for 5-6 hours, giving any perpetrators plenty of time to escape. We don’t know if Jeffery was there or not at the Samarkand, but we do know Jeffery had his cronies loot both of Jimi’s apartments (in the US and the UK) shortly after Jimi died, so we know that Jeffery did indeed have operatives to do his dirty work for him.
Is that so how exactly do you know this for sure. Devon was told she could have the stuff in Jimi’s New York apartment and Jimi did not have his apartment in London as he had been away from the Uk for a while. Where are you getting this nonsense from. You are deliberately distorting the truth and creating false scenarios. You are both a load of liars deliberately giving false and misleading information. As far as I am aware Kathy was still living in the Mayfair apartment she shared with Jimi which has been recently refurbished. This was no longer his home when he returned to London as he was staying at the Cumberland Hotel and not with the recently married Kathy and her husband. Stop spreading you dumb stupid lies. You have a serious problem distinguishing truth from fantasy you just can’t tell the difference. Jason and I are getting our information from valid sources i.e. published books but where are you getting this ludicrous garbage from. The coroner’s report stated all that was needed to know regarding Jimi’s death. You have failed to let go of the basic premise in Wright’s book which suggested murder even though this book was discredited years ago. The coroner wrote what he did because there was insufficient evidence of intention to commit suicide that is why he said at the inquest why Jimi took so many pills cannot be safely answered. Therefore the open verdict and not because of a cover up or subterfuge like you love to put out there. The folks who had you banned from other sites could see exactly what you stood for and cut you off.
Arthur Allen told of Jimi’s apartment in New York being looted & they even took some of Devon’s belongings. This info can be found in the Aleem Twins book “‘Ghetto Fighters in Harlem World”. Try reading it, sometime.
Where do you get the info from that “Jimi did not have his apartment in London”? Same place you get all your nonsense from — out of your ass.
Try looking at the death certificate — it clearly states Jimi was residing at the Cumberland Hotel and gives the exact address.
Gee, you’re STUPID !!
And we will provide another copy and paste job just for Jason……….
** Kathy Etchingham’s investigation has been spoken about by these liars, but they seemingly avoid one particular regarding that investigation.
And that is — Kathy noted that the people who were there at the Samarkand that morning such Stickells, Burdon, Barrett, Slater were all totally reluctant to talk to the authorities during her investigation in the early 1990’s. Why would they be reluctant to talk to the authorities if there was no foul play involved? And why did they just leave Jimi’s body to be found hours later with massive amounts of dried vomit?
Monika’s Opel sports car was sitting right outside that Samarkand flat, so that means they already had a way of transporting Jimi to the hospital. Why didn’t they get Jimi on his feet and put him into that Opel sports car & take him to a nearby hospital? Why was Jimi just left for dead like that 5-6 hours, to have the ambulance men find him in the state that they did, if there was no foul play, as these two lying-denying pigbreeders (Jason and Ivana) claim?
Find your imaginary wine you claim.
After you do that, produce documentation that the phony wine removal happened.
You are making the claims, produce some real evidence.
Flyswatter: Looks like the devil has Jason’s tongue…Seems like he’s having trouble answering your excellent points there directly and is trying to use his open contempt for the evidence for the wine that we already showed as an excuse to not answer…I wonder what he is hiding from with those phony denier evidence-avoider tricks?…
Who gives a fuck what Jason thinks anyway?…He’s just an internet asshole who is pretending he doesn’t believe Jimi was murdered or there was evidence for it…He’s a lying scumbag in other words who is just going to say no to any evidence he sees so therefore he’s not credible nor are his complaints…He has the balls to think he can keep raising the hoops and hurdles with his lying denials and we have to keep jumping through them in order to hear his next idiotic set of lies against otherwise obvious evidence…
We’ve already found that wine several times over…You have to remember it is Jason who says Bannister is a crazy hoaxer…Meanwhile the evidence itself and most of the people who read it think Bannister is a truth-teller…After all, the facts are with him despite Jason’s sick denials…When you tell Jason his source Dr Siefert is the proven liar because he said Jimi was covered in wine but then turned around and said he detected no alcohol on Jimi, Jason ignores it and tries to distract you by saying you are changing your story…But this lying piece of shit Jason still hasn’t answered or taken responsibility for the fact that his source Siefert is the liar and the person who isn’t telling the truth…Jason uses the trolling technique of always going on the offensive, but he still hasn’t answered for Siefert…We’ve found the wine because we have Siefert acknowledging it when he said Jimi was covered in it…While Jason is pretending he is controlling the debate with his dishonest argument technique, he still hasn’t accounted for the fact that Siefert said Jimi was covered in red wine and that red wine has no explainable source if Jimi died from an accidental choking on vomit overdose case…Since Jason can’t explain that wine, and we can see him trying to use dishonest arguing techniques to get around it, that is what you would call proof since Jason’s best trolling efforts can’t give any credible answer to it…That wine Siefert witnessed and told of was wine spilled on Jimi while they poured it down his throat…It has to be because anyone who reads these posts can see Jason can’t answer it and his excuses are pretty fucking pathetic…Also the wine Dr Thurston said was in Jimi’s stomach is also documentation that was covered-up…It is only Jason who says all the wine witnesses are liars…Jason is a sick motherfucker because only a sick motherfucker would fail so badly to answer the evidence he calls for and then step right up in the next post and accuse us of failing to provide that same evidence he failed to answer so badly…
We have already produced that documentation because when we produced the Inquest document that said “Unable To Resuscitate” we produced proof that they actually did work on Jimi, contrary to Jason’s previous lie that no work was done on Jimi…The Hospital Report says “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15″…That is adequate documentation for the wine removal because Jason has no answer for it except to dishonestly troll that we have failed to produce the documentation we just produced…In his idiotic, trolling, one-line denials and demands for the evidence we just produced Jason ignores that the half hour listed on the Hospital Report fits Dr Bannister’s account of suctioning wine for 20 minutes and then attempting ventilation for 10 minutes perfectly…It also proves that his source, Dr Siefert, is caught lying once again…The wine is proven because Jason can’t answer what exactly they were doing for that half hour except removing the wine Dr’s Bannister, Siefert, and Thurston witnessed?…There’s a lot of content in that empty space Jason conspicuously leaves in his last post…The devil obviously has Jason’s tongue…
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire says:
November 1, 2019 at 12:44 am
Find your imaginary wine you claim.
After you do that, produce documentation that the phony wine removal happened.
You are making the claims, produce some real evidence.”
Dr. Bannister, Dr. Seifert, Dr. Brown, Dr. Teare, and Dr Thurston already found the wine. Plus Monika told both Tony Brown and Sharon Lawrence that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day that Jimi died. Those aren’t “claims” as Jason foolishly tries to depict, those are reference sources to the people that were there & gave testimony to it.
The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” and no matter how much Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, it does not change or alter that fact that a resuscitation attempt was made and treatment was done for 30 minutes from 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Those are the documented facts that Jason’s lying misquotes can’t get around. This 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book ‘Inside the Experience”, published in 1990, and that info was most likely gotten from the hospital report.
Anybody can go to You Tube and watch the video “The Last 24 Hours” and if they watch closely, they will see the coroner’s form and see where it says “Unable to Resuscitate”.
Can’t you read Flysquatter? The Cumberland Hotel is not a permanent residence like his Mayfair flat was. He booked in here after his European tour. You clearly don’t understand the definition of hotel. Jimi stayed in hotel room 506 which has now been turned into a permanent tribute to him. I clearly stated he was staying there. No one with any taste would be reading a dumb book like “Ghetto Fighters” you must have been the very few who did which says it all really. You clearly can’t tell the difference between fact and fiction; just look at what you post here.
I read just, you stupid sow (Ivana). Hotel or apartment, doesn’t make any difference, as both places were looted after Jimi died.
All your telling me is that you can’t answer what Arthur Allen stated.
I noticed also that you still have no answer for this:
Kathy noted that the people who were there at the Samarkand that morning such Stickells, Burdon, Barrett, Slater were all totally reluctant to talk to the authorities during her investigation in the early 1990’s. Why would they be reluctant to talk to the authorities if there was no foul play involved? And why did they just leave Jimi’s body to be found hours later with massive amounts of dried vomit?
Monika’s Opel sports car was sitting right outside that Samarkand flat, so that means they already had a way of transporting Jimi to the hospital. Why didn’t they get Jimi on his feet and put him into that Opel sports car & take him to a nearby hospital? Why was Jimi just left for dead like that 5-6 hours, to have the ambulance men find him in the state that they did, if there was no foul play, as these two lying-denying pigbreeders (Jason and Ivana) claim?
When you are already dead, you are unable to resuscitate. Siefert hooked Jimi up to the monitor an pounded his heart twice and did the basic formality.
Hospital regulations state if you attempt a basic formality resuscitation you have to list as “unable to resuscitate”. That doesn’t mean 30 minute attempts were made since Siefert is documented as saying it never happened.
They didn’t speak because there was nothing to speak about. They stated everything in the early days in magazines, books and interviews. Kathy’s investigation was more about the delay in calling the ambulance when Monika phoned around for help and this, it has been suggested, may have contributed to Jimi’s death. It’s been said there was a clean up at the Samarkand. Remember the Attorney General found nothing new or suspicious or anything that warranted a new inquest. You need to respect those findings and not go off on another tangent with suspicions of a cover up. There is no basis for what you’re are saying. This is coming from you and you only.
Transporting a dead person to a hospital is not something that is recommended you always wait for the ambulance to arrive. Monika being alone with Jimi at the time could not have done this on her own. That’s just common sense. Gerry Stickells stated at the time that anyone who remembers what happened decades ago is making it up. You are always assuming that foul play was involved but you have no real proof that this happened; your particular gullible mental disposition makes you believe all this nonsense. This scenario of murder did not exist in the early 70’s. This emerged later with Wright’s book discredited as a fraud but you are still believing it therefore you can’t be trusted with anything you write or think. The unreliable books you are getting your information from differ significantly from the books written close to Jimi’s death. Those are the ones you should be reading. Some of the books you are drawn to make sensationalist claims in order to sell more copies but you can’t see this for what it really is.
You’re not helping anyone with your claims of murder but just hoping to profit in some way from your dishonest claims. I even doubt you are truly fans of Jimi as what you claim does not change the fact that he died of inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication despite what you believe or want others to believe. I think you lack any real insight in this issue as all you seem to like doing is using obscene remarks with anyone who questions the validity of what you say. This makes you look trashy, desperate and naive.
Buster the clown switches from one phony theory to the next.
After I debunk his phony claim, he moves to another, and then jumps back to the same claim saying “I never answered it.”
I’ve already debunked this phony Vesparax claim several times.
Buster the clown must be suffering from severe memory loss.
Buster purposely omits the fact that Jimi took a powerful upper called a “black bomber” at Kameron’s party before he swallowed 9 Vesparax pills that caused a severe reaction which resulted in a drug overdose.
Hunter was not conducting Jimi’s autopsy in 1970 so he has no idea what Teare was examining or witnessing. It is only his after the fact opinion like all these other hoax claims.
Still Buster has no evidence of wine nor does he have any medical documentation for the weird procedures he claims happened on Jimi Hendrix. Buster still has no wine to claim since no documentation ever exists anywhere.
Buster takes another defeat with another pathetic and repetitive attempt.
Jason is once again lying…Anyone can read this thread and see that every time I made my barbiturate forensic argument (and it is a very solid argument that no one has ever refuted even though it was presented on a radio show to a 3 million demographic in New York City) Jason has self-excused and hand-waved and never given any credible answer to it…He does that again here just like he did every time before…My barbiturate forensic argument proves that Jimi could not have overdosed on the 9 Vesparax tablets he took nor could it have caused the vomiting…Anyone can see Jason running from this and making excuses so he’s not fooling anyone…Jason is lying when he says he debunked it several times already…Anyone can read the thread and see he never once tried to address it…
Jason is too stupid to realize that if his phony attempt to claim the Black Bomber was the straw that caused Jimi to overdose were true then the Inquest and autopsy would have claimed such…Of all the professionals who looked at it like Teare, Crompton, Hunter, and Wecht, none of them claimed what you say and said the Black Bomber was what caused the overdose…Jason is too stupid to realize the amphetamine in the Black Bomber would counter act the barbiturate and actually reduce its effect even more…I would guess that a stimulant might be part of the medical treatment for a barbiturate overdose and Jason is merely pulling this Black Bomber claim out of his ass because he’s seeking to avoid answering my barbiturate forensics that he never addressed directly…The long and the short of it is my forensic argument is proven correct by the fact Jason couldn’t credibly answer it…Plus he tried to BS around it…
Hunter looked at the same autopsy report that Crompton did…Jason’s reply is once again idiotic because the whole purpose of an autopsy report is to enter the critical forensic information necessary to make the cause of death conclusions…Hunter knew what Teare witnessed because it was written in the report…Hunter saw the barbiturate readings and claimed Jimi died of drowning of the lungs and did not die of a barbiturate overdose…Jason is dumb because he fails to realize that his claim that Hunter did not witness what Teare did is exactly what we are saying about Teare not witnessing what Bannister & Siefert did…Jason makes more excuses but he doesn’t honestly admit the Medical Examiner of the City of San Francisco backed Bannister…
Jason has obviously gone to Crosstown Torrents and read the denial attempts by the assholes over there…They also thought they could concentrate on cheap defamation and denial of Bannister and Tappy Wright…But, like Jason here, they also lost badly when the facts they couldn’t answer from the rest of the evidence built up against them…
BUSTER says: Jason is once again lying…Anyone can read this thread and see that every time I made my barbiturate forensic argument (and it is a very solid argument that no one has ever refuted even though it was presented on a radio show to a 3 million demographic in New York City) Jason has self-excused and hand-waved and never given any credible answer to it…He does that again here just like he did every time before…My barbiturate forensic argument proves that Jimi could not have overdosed on the 9 Vesparax tablets he took nor could it have caused the vomiting…Anyone can see Jason running from this and making excuses so he’s not fooling anyone…Jason is lying when he says he debunked it several times already…Anyone can read the thread and see he never once tried to address it…
JASON says: More b.s. since you can’t omit a “black bomber” which is powerful upper. Your phony claim has been debunked.
BUSTER says: Jason is too stupid to realize that if his phony attempt to claim the Black Bomber was the straw that caused Jimi to overdose were true then the Inquest and autopsy would have claimed such…Of all the professionals who looked at it like Teare, Crompton, Hunter, and Wecht, none of them claimed what you say and said the Black Bomber was what caused the overdose…Jason is too stupid to realize the amphetamine in the Black Bomber would counter act the barbiturate and actually reduce its effect even more…I would guess that a stimulant might be part of the medical treatment for a barbiturate overdose and Jason is merely pulling this Black Bomber claim out of his ass because he’s seeking to avoid answering my barbiturate forensics that he never addressed directly…The long and the short of it is my forensic argument is proven correct by the fact Jason couldn’t credibly answer it…Plus he tried to BS around it…
JASON says: An ignorant person like Buster has no clue how opposite pills like powerful uppers and downers cause a sever drug overdose.
BUSTER says: Hunter looked at the same autopsy report that Crompton did…Jason’s reply is once again idiotic because the whole purpose of an autopsy report is to enter the critical forensic information necessary to make the cause of death conclusions…Hunter knew what Teare witnessed because it was written in the report…Hunter saw the barbiturate readings and claimed Jimi died of drowning of the lungs and did not die of a barbiturate overdose…Jason is dumb because he fails to realize that his claim that Hunter did not witness what Teare did is exactly what we are saying about Teare not witnessing what Bannister & Siefert did…Jason makes more excuses but he doesn’t honestly admit the Medical Examiner of the City of San Francisco backed Bannister…
JASON says: Looking at an autopsy is not the same as preforming it. You get an entirely different perspective o what is happening. Teare fond no signs of forced trauma or a wine drowning so you still lose your phony wine claim.
BUSTER says: Jason has obviously gone to Crosstown Torrents and read the denial attempts by the assholes over there…They also thought they could concentrate on cheap defamation and denial of Bannister and Tappy Wright…But, like Jason here, they also lost badly when the facts they couldn’t answer from the rest of the evidence built up against them…
JASON says: It’s impossible for me to have lost when I’ve totally debunked every phony claim you ever came up with.
Well, it looks like the ghosts, spooks, ghouls, and goblins haven’t quit haunting Buster the clown yet as he tells us another whopper of a pathological lie.
Buster now changes his fake story yet again. How many times has this Hoaxer done this?
The question is why is he trying to diminish the role he originally claimed ex Doctor Bannister played? Maybe it’s cuz I wrote my 2 part Bannister series and he is pathetically trying to discredit what I wrote?
Well, that’s too bad cuz we have all of Buster the clown’s lies and story changing contradictions for all to see. Before it was every couple of weeks Buster would change his fake stories. Now it’s about every post as he has reached manic lying mode.
Buster has been telling us all along that Bannister removed and disposed of the wine himself. Buster has just made up a brand new lie trying to now blame the nurses for dumping out the wine. Can you believe how fraudulent that is? Just a couple of days ago Buster was claiming Seifert was involved with his new lie. What’s hilarious is that Buster the clown is making up lies and changing his stories based on something that never even happened. None of these fake procedures ever happened. That’s what makes this whole thing so hilarious. Below you will see Buster the clown’ s original lie followed by his brand new made up lie yesterday evening. Enjoy!
BUSTER says: Caesar’s worst blunder is his claim that the red wine didn’t exist because it wasn’t detected at the autopsy. In another example of Caesar’s pure stupidity, he failed to realize the wine could not possibly be found at the autopsy because it had been suctioned-out and disposed of down the drain by Dr Bannister at the hospital 3 days earlier.
BUSTER says: We know there was wine dumped down the drain because the doctor who did it (Bannister told me it was actually the nurses who handled that chore) told me so himself…
JASON says: Buster the clown caught red handed yet again. Doesn’t he know all his lies exist in public domain for all to see?
First, Buster tells us specfically that Bannister himself removed the imaginary wine and dumped it down the drain. No mention of Dr. Siefert helping him or nurses.
Second, Buster lies and changes his fake story yet again now trying to claim that the nurses dumped out the wine as Buster tells us another fake account of “speaking with Bannister”.
So Buster, who dumped the imaginary wine down the drain? Was it Bannister like you always said or the nurses as you claimed of last evening? Which is it? You can’t have it both ways.
Another story changing lie from Buster the clown as he is caught yet again and has no credibility. He keeps lying thinking he won’t get caught changing his phony claims.
For the record, no wine removal procedures were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix since there is no documentation of any procedures on Hendrix. Hospital doctors and nurses do not perform weird medical procedures on a 6 hour dead corpse awaiting an autopsy cuz it destroys the autopsy results. They certainly don’t destroy bodily fluids from a dead corpse awaiting an autopsy since that is illegal.
Also, Buster is too stupid to realize that if Hendrix was “massively drowned in wine” it would still show up in the autopsy results since forensic analysis would determine it. No massive wine was ever analyzed. No wine was ever determined as the cause of death nor was listed in the autopsy.
Buster the clown will forever lose on this alone.
Buster’s lies still have come back to haunt him a few hours after Halloween.
BOO! Caught you again!
Not sure what to make of our lying wine hoaxer Buster the clown who continues to rant like a loon repeating the same lies over and over.
Buster was already told that hospitals and doctors don’t perform weird medical procedures on a 6 hour dead corpse that is awaiting an autopsy.
Buster was already told that doctors don’t destroy bodily fluids from a dead corpse since that is illegal.
Buster the clown continues with his obsessive charade of weird medical procedures on a dead 6 hour Hendrix corpse, with a phony “hard plug of vomit removal”, “wine removal”, “dumping 5 bottles of wine out of Jimi’s body down the drain” all which is a total crock since it never happened. Nothing on Hendrix’s medical record shows these procedures ever happening for Jimi Hendrix. But Buster the wine hoaxer claims that it did with no evidence or proof, just his fake lying phony words and a fake claim of speaking with Bannister personally is all he has to show for his troubles.
Buster’s only ridiculous comment is to say the doctors had no idea Hendrix was dead for 6 hours even after I’ve showed this moron the doctors knew since they gave testimony stating they knew. We can all have another laugh at Buster the clown’s stupidity.
BUSTER says: Jason knows they had no way to know how long Jimi was dead, but he enters that they knew he was dead for 6 hours anyway
“The man had been dead some time. The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Doctor Bob Brown
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital”- Ex Doctor Bannister
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse.” – ex Doctor Bannister
“The body was cold, there we no signs of circulation and my overall impression was he’d been dead for several hours. He was completely cold. I personally think he died long before. He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of somebody who had been dead for some time.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
JASON says: Two doctors Brown and Bannister testified that Hendrix was a dead corpse for hours. Pathological liar Buster the clown says the doctors “didn’t know Jimi was dead for hours”. Well, there are their exact words telling Buster the clown that they knew Jimi was dead for hours. How do you like them apples?
This tells us and proves this is all a hoax since doctors would not be performing “procedures” on a 6 hour long dead corpse. Do you see this Buster? Can you read it? Two doctors testified that Hendrix was already dead for hours. But in your next post, you will lie again claiming the “doctors had no way of knowing Jimi was dead for hours”. They just told you he was, moron. Just debunked you once again!
Buster continues to provide pure comedy gold for all of us!
Jason is obviously pretty desperate if he is reduced to basically dwelling on typos and semantics…I mean who does Jason think he’s fooling?…On a properly moderated discussion board Jason would have been booted a long time ago for his obnoxious trolling…He’s also nuts if he thinks anyone is actually reading or taking seriously his nutty Part 1 and Part 2 denial essay…Anyone of any basic intelligence or common sense would see it is just the effort of an internet nut who is scanning the material and figuring out ways to nay-say troll it…In any case if that is the best Jason can do we’ve pretty much won the debate…You would have to be either really stupid or crazy to try to get away with what Jason does…
In any case the commas, crossed t’s, and typos Jason focuses on does not do anything to change the fact Dr Bannister told me in person that Siefert got there first and removed the plug of vomit and the nurses poured the wine down the drain…If Jason had any sense he would realize it had to be that way because Siefert and Bannister were busy trying to suction the wine out of Jimi…Jason’s trying to prove I am lying because I applied that process to Bannister as a general reference is as silly as it is crazy and is just part of his evasive trolling technique…It doesn’t change any of what happened and Jason is only doing it in order to avoid the evidence we showed in our last posts where we proved the wine removal and its half hour treatment time…
Jason ignores everything that has been repeated to him over and over by repeating the false claim that Siefert and Bannister would not have worked on a body that was dead for 6 hours…Jason ignores that Siefert and Bannister were not exposed to the information that Jimi was dead for 6 hours at that time…That knowledge wasn’t realized until Kathy Etchingham’s investigation in 1992, so Jason is trollishly and defiantly claiming something he has already been shown was impossible…Jason is lying here and the job of emergency room doctors is to try and save a patient until all efforts have been made…Jason is stupid because if Bannister and Siefert did nothing the autopsy would have discovered Jimi’s lungs and stomach bursting with wine and would have asked them why they did nothing?…Again, Jason is a sick troll because he is trying this dishonest move right in the face of being shown the documentation for a half hour-long resuscitation attempt…The truth is the unusual amount of wine Siefert and Bannister saw drew their attention and they focused on it as what they needed to concentrate on and remove…That’s why they worked on him because as doctors they knew they needed to get that wine out of Jimi if any attempt to save him was going to be done…
And, after all that has been shown to Jason, he caps off his sick denial by repeating his claim that the autopsy would have seen the 5 bottles of wine inside Jimi…Even though he has been repeatedly informed that wine was removed 3 days earlier and disposed of at hospital…This is why any credibly-moderated room would give this obnoxious trolling piece of shit Jason the boot…
Just to show how stupid Jason is, and how he accuses everyone of lying like a crazy troll who doesn’t have any fear for his own credibility, Jason accuses me of lying about my interviews with Bannister…When my work comes out those interviews will be published and Jason will be shown to be the nay-saying nut he is…All Jason is doing there is showing the public how shallow he is and how the extent of his credibility on this subject is only as deep as his trolling of internet comments sections…
Jason is a crazy fool because he is re-entering his previous lies in order to dodge giving a credible answer to Dr Siefert corroborating Dr Bannister by saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…There is no plausible explanation for that wine that Jimi was soaked in unless it was spill-over from the wine that was forced down Jimi’s throat…Monika mentioned somewhere that she picked up a bottle of red and one of white that afternoon…Jason is also avoiding giving an honest answer to the fact Scotland Yard deliberately avoided interviewing the nurses because they knew the nurses would corroborate the wine and that would then force them to interview Dr Bannister, which would then force them to honestly investigate the wine they had successfully avoided up to that point…Jason is sick servant of Satan who seeks and dwells in the darkest places created by dishonesty…
You’re not fooling anyone you miserable piece of shit Jason…You’re getting away with your trolling but what you have avoided in this thread stands in judgment of you no matter how hard you troll it…May you burn in hell motherfucker…
Awful post from you. If you won the “debate” you wouldn’t be behaving this way swearing and going out of control like a crazy mad man.
You’re not answering the evidence you rotten piece of shit Jason…You’re trolling instead of answering Siefert’s witnessing of Jimi being covered in wine and its true evidentiary meaning…You are also contemptuously ignoring the significance of the proven half hour treatment time that was recorded on the Hospital Report…Mitch’s writer, John Platt, was British so he obviously accessed the St Mary Abbots Hospital Report…He wrote that Jimi was treated from 11:45 to 12:15…You lied when you said Jimi wasn’t treated…The proof of it is right there in the Hospital Report that backs Bannister…
If you had any valid evidence that we were wrong you wouldn’t have been so badly unable to answer the facts I posted in my last post that you could only muster a one-line answer to…
When we find out who you are it will become clear that you are not a credible person and you come from a background where you have an agenda to troll and deny Jimi’s murder…You’ve already lost on points…All you are is the trolling turd in the evidence thread punch bowl…
Hi Jason. I can’t believe what’s coming out of Buster and his sycophantic sidekick Flysquatter. These two are clearly nuts with their mention of Satan and burning in hell and name calling. This goes far beyond what’s normal and acceptable in a forum. I can only suggest that they deserve the same fate as as the other sites that banned then. Just the desperation of trying to prove a crime happened when it clearly didn’t goes beyond the boundaries of reason. They are placing their trust in people that just don’t warrant it and scenarios that are make believe. Both of us can see this is a hoax but these two feeble mind individuals are falling for a succession of lies yet when you ask them to prove what their saying they back off. Buster and Flysquatter don’t know any of this for sure but they present it as if it is real evidence which of course it is not; it’s just their belief and not fact. Buster talks up his soon to be published work which will probably suffer the same fate as Wright’s book and the Allen Bros as works of fiction. What bugs me the most is how easily they fall for certain beliefs and their inability to decipher fact from fiction. They just seem to believe anything they read without questioning whether these authors are being honest with what they are writing. The more unlikely a scenario is the more they fall for it. Just take the example of the doctors working on someone who had been dead for hours we both know this is a ridiculous claim with the suctioning of five bottles of wine in a futile resuscitation attempt. But these two believe it actually took place. How can anyone then believe what their saying here. Talk about dumb.
Hi Ivana,
They both are clearly out of bounds with their posts. That’s cuz they know they’ve been clearly defeated and have no other phony claims left to use. Any new phony claim they make up just debunks their already debunked phony claim. So they can only swear and repeat their same nonsense.
That’s what they get for lying and peddling fake hoax when it can be easily refuted.
Buster has run out of gas here. He isn’t even trying to be serious with his phony clams. All he can do is use vulgar language and repeat the same fake debunked claims. He knows he has been defeated.
BUSTER says: May you burn in hell motherfucker…
JASON says: Buster is out of control. We can’t have an honest discussion with this kind of language.
BUSTER says: Jason is obviously pretty desperate if he is reduced to basically dwelling on typos and semantics…I mean who does Jason think he’s fooling?…On a properly moderated discussion board Jason would have been booted a long time ago for his obnoxious trolling…He’s also nuts if he thinks anyone is actually reading or taking seriously his nutty Part 1 and Part 2 denial essay…Anyone of any basic intelligence or common sense would see it is just the effort of an internet nut who is scanning the material and figuring out ways to nay-say troll it…In any case if that is the best Jason can do we’ve pretty much won the debate…You would have to be either really stupid or crazy to try to get away with what Jason does…
JASON says: Buster still cries for me to be banned cuz I’ve refuted his nonsense time and time again. You’ve been banned from every Hendrix site acting like you do on here. I’m just posting accurate information and exposing your lies. Noting wrong with that and that does not constitute a banning. Sorry.
Sorry Buster, these aren’t typos. These are your lies, contradictions, and story changes that proves you to be a liar and a hoaxer. No legitimate person changes stories like you do. No serious claim can have all these different changes all the time.that’s why this is all a hoax. All the readers can see it.
BUSTER says: In any case the commas, crossed t’s, and typos Jason focuses on does not do anything to change the fact Dr Bannister told me in person that Siefert got there first and removed the plug of vomit and the nurses poured the wine down the drain…If Jason had any sense he would realize it had to be that way because Siefert and Bannister were busy trying to suction the wine out of Jimi…Jason’s trying to prove I am lying because I applied that process to Bannister as a general reference is as silly as it is crazy and is just part of his evasive trolling technique…It doesn’t change any of what happened and Jason is only doing it in order to avoid the evidence we showed in our last posts where we proved the wine removal and its half hour treatment time…
JASON says: This is another lie cuz in your past stories you never mentioned Siefert until I posted Part 2 of my Banister Series a few days ago. We have all your original contradicting claims only taking about Bannister. You are not allowed to change your fake stories.
Also, Bannister never mentions Siefert in any of his real interviews. So you are lying.
There was no “treatment time” since Siefert already testified to there was “no point in doing anything else”.
Trying to suction wine with a small metal sucker would take hours to accomplish. That’s why this all a hoax.
BUSTER says: Jason ignores everything that has been repeated to him over and over by repeating the false claim that Siefert and Bannister would not have worked on a body that was dead for 6 hours…Jason ignores that Siefert and Bannister were not exposed to the information that Jimi was dead for 6 hours at that time.
JASON says: Buster ignores that Bannister said Hendrix was already dead for hours but Buster is moron who cant read the written English language. Buster is too stupid to understand that doctors can estimate the amount of time a person has been dead. That is their job. They don’t need Kathy Etchingham to tell them 21 years later cuz she was never there at the hospital in 1970 to view his dead body being wheeled in. Buster is a clown who continues to provide pure comedy. Here is Bannister telling him again.
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital”- Ex Doctor Bannister
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse.” – ex Doctor Bannister
“The body was cold, there we no signs of circulation and my overall impression was he’d been dead for several hours. He was completely cold. I personally think he died long before. He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of somebody who had been dead for some time.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
JASON says: Bannister is telling Buster the moron that Hendrix was dead for hours. But he ignores it over and over again.
BUSTER says: Jason ignores that Siefert and Bannister were not exposed to the information that Jimi was dead for 6 hours at that time…That knowledge wasn’t realized until Kathy Etchingham’s investigation in 1992, so Jason is trollishly and defiantly claiming something he has already been shown was impossible…
JASON says: What a terrible troll job by you showing off your blatant ignorance. Kathy was never at the hospital to view Hendrix’s body in 1970 to see the condition it was in. The doctors were and estimated Hendrix to be dead for hours. The only way Kathy would know that is cuz the doctors told her, you moron. Your ignorance sure shows with this garbage you peddle. You provide pure comedy gold!
BUSTER says: Jason is lying here and the job of emergency room doctors is to try and save a patient until all efforts have been made…
JASON says: When a person is declared dead on arrival there is nothing to save. Dr. Siefert and Brown already told you that.
BUSTER says: Jason is stupid because if Bannister and Siefert did nothing the autopsy would have discovered Jimi’s lungs and stomach bursting with wine and would have asked them why they did nothing?…
JASON says: There was no wine ever in Jimi’s lungs. That is onlyh the bogus hoax you claim.
BUSTER says: Again, Jason is a sick troll because he is trying this dishonest move right in the face of being shown the documentation for a half hour-long resuscitation attempt…
JASON says: You’re the one who is sick cuz you’ve been shown time and time again there never a “half hour resuscitation” attempt.
BUSTER says:The truth is the unusual amount of wine Siefert and Bannister saw drew their attention and they focused on it as what they needed to concentrate on and remove…That’s why they worked on him because as doctors they knew they needed to get that wine out of Jimi if any attempt to save him was going to be done…
JASON says: Another phony story coming from your crazy head. No wine was ever officially documented. There has to be documentation and there is none. That proves this never happened.
BUSTER says: And, after all that has been shown to Jason, he caps off his sick denial by repeating his claim that the autopsy would have seen the 5 bottles of wine inside Jimi…Even though he has been repeatedly informed that wine was removed 3 days earlier and disposed of at hospital…This is why any credibly-moderated room would give this obnoxious trolling piece of shit Jason the boot…
JASON says: A wine troll like you doesn’t get to demand that people get to be banned. quit whining. My postings are accurate and exposes your lies. Your abusive posts are against the rules. Probably why you’ve been banned from all the Hendrix sites.
You are lying. Hospitals don’t remove and dump out bodily fluids from a dead body awaiting an autopsy. That is against the law. If wine was saturating the insides of a body, the wine would still show up in the forensic analysis in the autopsy, moron. That’s why your claim is a hoax.
BUSTER says: Just to show how stupid Jason is, and how he accuses everyone of lying like a crazy troll who doesn’t have any fear for his own credibility, Jason accuses me of lying about my interviews with Bannister…When my work comes out those interviews will be published and Jason will be shown to be the nay-saying nut he is…All Jason is doing there is showing the public how shallow he is and how the extent of his credibility on this subject is only as deep as his trolling of internet comments sections…
JASON says: You’ve accused everyone of a “cover up” and are lying. Yes, Tappy Wright, Fraud Bannister and Sharon Lawrence are all liars. I’ve proven that many times.
Interviews are meaningless unless you have wine documented on Hendrix’s medical file that proves your claim.
BUSTER says: Jason is a crazy fool because he is re-entering his previous lies in order to dodge giving a credible answer to Dr Siefert corroborating Dr Bannister by saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…There is no plausible explanation for that wine that Jimi was soaked in unless it was spill-over from the wine that was forced down Jimi’s throat…Monika mentioned somewhere that she picked up a bottle of red and one of white that afternoon…Jason is also avoiding giving an honest answer to the fact Scotland Yard deliberately avoided interviewing the nurses because they knew the nurses would corroborate the wine and that would then force them to interview Dr Bannister, which would then force them to honestly investigate the wine they had successfully avoided up to that point…Jason is sick servant of Satan who seeks and dwells in the darkest places created by dishonesty…
JASON says: Being “soaked in wine” as you claim is not the same as being flooded with wine from the insides that was never documented on record by anyone.
You are seriously downgrading your phony hoax. You only can now account for one bottle of wine and are missing the four other bottles. What happened to the other 4 you clam?
Also, the ambulance men never witnessed any “spilled wine”. They only witnessed vomit.
Wine was forced down Jimi’s throat? You just said that “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”. You just change your phony claims with ease. Pathetic.
BUSTER says: You’re not fooling anyone you miserable piece of shit Jason…You’re getting away with your trolling but what you have avoided in this thread stands in judgment of you no matter how hard you troll it…
You’re the only who’s trolling with your fake claims that you change each post. All the readers can see it.
BUSTER says: May you burn in hell motherfucker…
JASON says: Same to you.
BUSTER says: What Jason is trying to do with his word games is avoid honestly answering that Dr Seifert got to Jimi first and removed the hard plug of vomit in his throat…
JASON says: Sorry Buster, you’re the only one playing word games. All the readers see it. You are lying again. You always stated that Bannister did he job himself. Now you are lying claiming Siefert did. Siefert said in documented testimony that he only pounded Jimi’s heart twice and that was it. You made up the fake hard plug of vomit story. That doesn’t exist.
BUSTER says: Bannister arrived shortly after and saw the wine flooding up to Jimi’s larynx…Both Siefert and Bannister spent the next 20 minutes suctioning the wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach…When done they spend 10 minutes trying to ventilate Jimi…This is entered as “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15” on the Hospital Report…Jason can’t honestly answer this so he trolls that I didn’t get my story right instead of honestly answering the truthful account that was posted…If Bannister didn’t mention Siefert publicly it was because he didn’t want to involve him…He did mention him to me…Jason is not too bright because the nurses could have confirmed it…
JASON says: You are lying again. Your original fake story has Bannister doing the work himself. Siefert never testified to suctioning any wine. All he did was pound Jimi’s heart twice.
This “wine removal” is a hoax. The instrument Bannister claimed he used would take hours to clear out wine from a body. Those instruments are delicate and not powerful cuz they are specifically designed not to destroy anything in the throat. All that wine removal would take hours to perform and several hundreds of attempts to suck out wine. Trying to get wine from the stomach would be even more impossible cuz you would need a different device.
No way could you remove a “hard plug of vomit” and do a full wine removal in 30 minutes This is all a hoax.
Buster lies once again since there was no fake hard plug of vomit or a phony wine removal. Yes, I’ve answered this like a million times now. Make an appointment to see a doctor for your severe memory loss. You should be concerned since you can’t even remember from the last post or the many posts I’ve already debunked this same phony claim.
There were no “treatments” done on Jimi Hendrix as he was a 6 hour long dead corpse. Dr. Martin Siefert and Dr. Bob Brown already testified that nothing could be done or was done for Hendrix. Now Buster makes up anorher new lie claiming he was told “private information” by Bannister saying he didn’t want to involve Siefert. What a crock from a crackpot.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Once again Dr. Siefert tells this loon that no procedures were ever done besides the basic resuscitation formality. But then this loon makes up fake stories in his crazy head claiming he spoke with a lunatic doctor as he invents new fake stories in each post.
The readers can see this joker has zero credibility and that’s all that counts.
BUSTER says: We know the wine removal occurred at the hospital…
JASON says: No wine removal ever happened. Produce some documented evidence from St Mary Abbots Hospital that it did. You can’t claim a “wine removal” unless you produce a written record that a wine removal happened.
BUSTER says: The ambulance men never went inside the hospital so they would have no way to see the wine removal, but Jason suggests it anyway because Jason is a sick motherfucker whose purpose is to enter any kind of crazy bullshit to screw up the discussion…
JASON says: Who cares about the ambulance men. Siefert and Brown said it never happened and that’s all we need to debunk your hoax. You are very angry and your language is terrible.
BUSTER says: Jimi’s Hospital Report simply listed “asphyxiation on vomit”, so it did list the wine Jimi was drowned in, only, like the ambulance men, it called the wine “vomit”…
JASON says: LMAO…Here is Buster’s word games again. Buster is using the absence of evidence to make another phony claim. No, they did not. You are a pathetic lying wine troll. Wine was never mentioned. Hendrix died from suffocation of vomit due to a drug overdose. No phony pure wine drowning ever happened since it would be a completely opposite reaction and death.
BUSTER says: And Dr Thurston was somehow told of Jimi’s stomach full of wine…So what Jason says isn’t true…
JASON says: False. Thurston never said a word about wine since there never was any wine. You are quoting a fake made up fake quote from Sharon Lawrence’s fiction book.
BUSTER says: Even though Siefert and Bannister had no way to know how long Jimi was dead Jason once again dishonestly suggests they knew Jimi was dead for 6 hours…Jason knows they had no way to know how long Jimi was dead, but he enters that they knew he was dead for 6 hours anyway…
JASON says: You’re lying again for the millionth time. Yes they knew Jimi was already dead for hours cuz they publicly stated he was.
BUSTER says: We know there was wine dumped down the drain because the doctor who did it (Bannister told me it was actually the nurses who handled that chore) told me so himself…
JASON says: This is total b.s. cuz nurses don’t dump out bodily fluids down the drain from a dead corpse awaiting an autopsy cuz its illegal. Bannister is claiming that a serious crime took place regarding Jimi Hendrix. This is illegal. He was involved then partaking in this crime which is what what Buster is telling us.
BUSTER says: Keep in mind Dr Bannister was the doctor who was there and witnessed it in person and Jason is just sick trolling internet scum who gets his rocks off on attacking terribly victimized celebrities and working for Satan…We know there was wine disposed of at St Mary’s because Scotland Yard avoided interviewing the nurses who would have confirmed it…
JASON says: What is with you and Satan? Get some help.
Buster is saying he was told this happened. Disposing of bodily fluids from a dead corpse is a serious crime and Buster is admitting this happened. This should be investigated cuz criminal acts are now being admitted to by Buster.
Buster has told many lies and changed his fake stories from what he was claiming before. We have a few of them here to share now. No real claimed event can have this many fake story changes. I suggest that Buster should start from scratch and make up a brand new phony claim since this one has been exhausted beyond repair. All of Buster’s lies are still haunting him after Halloween. The Ghosts of Christmas Past are certainly lurking about these days.
BUSTER says: The murder scene very clearly shows the signs of forced wine and its ensuing result and you know it.
JASON says: Really? Then how come John Saua, Reginal Jones, Officer Ian Smith, and the Coroner’s Officer never witnessed signs of forced wine? If it was this obvious, they all would have witnessed it. They never witnessed this kind of wine. Now you are backtracking saying something completely different now. You’re now playing word games
claiming “vomit means wine”. Boy, you sure changed your tune after you got caught lying. This is all a hoax folks. Buster changed his fake story from what he originally claimed.
BUSTER says: The wine was witnessed by the attendants. I’ll find the quote – they’re scattered around. But you’re foolish to question it in the first place since there were many witnesses who saw the wine.
JASON says: You were lying badly back then too. You can never “find the quote” since it never existed. John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed any wine. No witnesses saw any wine at the flat. You are lying. You are now reduced to playing word games saying “vomit means wine”. This proves that no wine drowning ever occurred. This is all a hoax folks.
BUSTER says: The amount of wine withdrawn by Bannister when combined with the wine seen splashed at the scene creates an amount of wine you can’t explain no matter how many specious attempts you make to avoid it. And that wine was witnessed by many people who you can’t make weak lack of credibility excuses for. There’s simply too much wine there for your weak attempts to cover-up no matter what you say.
JASON says: A-HA Bannister! See, back then you were saying that Bannister removed the wine himself. A few days ago you changed your fake story to Siefert was there first. You are a hoaxer who changes your fake stories all the time. You are lying cuz no wine was witnessed splashed at the scene. Many people did not witness wine Nobody at the flat witnessed any wine. More lying and changing your phony story make this all a hoax. This is all a hoax folks.
BUSTER says: Bannister’s version is backed by the ambulance attendants and the wine they witnessed at the scene. Your proposal is to ignore that and focus on specious accusations against Bannister.
JASON says: Wow…Now you really lied and told a whopper….the ambulance attendants refuted Bannister’s phony claims and never testified to witnessing wine. Why would you lie about this when documented testimony refutes your phony claims? No wine was ever witnessed and Bannister was refuted which is why you made up the fake “hard plug of vomit” claim to get around it. More lies and changing of fake stories. This is all a hoax folks.
No real serious claimed event can have this many story changes and fake fairy tales invented. This proves this is just a hoax perpetrated by a wine hoaxer who cant get his story straight. When Buster is called out on his phony clams he just makes up a brand new one that’s worse tan before. What’s hilarious is that his new fake claim debunks the old fake claim which debunks the whole phony theory. Buster needs to invent a brand new fake theory. This one has badly drowned.
Hi Jason. I’ve been reading an article on how to spot a liar. They seem to forget what they said previously and change and add things. Everything is also very detailed and specific. Sound familiar? How can anything this two hoaxers put out there be real or true.
Hi Ivana,
Sounds just like Buster with his fake stories. He forgets what fake stories he told and adds new ones while switching back to the old. Nothing is real with these hoaxers. Now Buster talks about the devil in his posts. Crazy. I think you are right about that being his name. Sounds just like the same nonsense he writes here.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, says:
November 1, 2019 at 2:08 am
Flysquatter embarrasses himself more and more with his pure ignorance.”
Keep dreaming, shitball. I’m embarrassing Jason with Jason’s pure ignorance & stupidity. Quite an easy task when dealing with someone who is a lover & maker of lies like Jason.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, says:
November 1, 2019 at 2:08 am
Bob Brown gave his comments 42 years after Jimi died citing Teare’s results of Jimi being slightly over the legal limit. Anybody can reference those results. Brown never mentioned a “wine drowning” and said Hendrix inhaled vomit and died of a drug overdose which the offical record states.”
Already proven that there is no way possible that Dr. Brown could have been citing the autopsy when Brown made reference to Jimi having “a bit too much to drink”, as the autopsy states Jimi’s blood alcohol content was .005% and that what Dr. Teare was talking about regarding 100mg was only an estimation at the time of Vesperax ingestion. Dr. Brown has never made reference to the autopsy data. Dr. Brown was citing what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots — there is no other possibility.
Jason continues to show his ignorance by repeatedly claiming “no wine” and then trying to refer to the 100mg estimate by Dr. Teare to try to support his lie about Dr. Brown citing the autopsy report.
All this proves is Jason can’t answer “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had too much to drink?”. It also proves that Jason can’t answer “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make an ESTIMATE of 100mg BAC at the time of Vesperax ingestion, if there was ‘no wine’, as Jason claims?”.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, says:
November 1, 2019 at 2:08 am
No wine was ever found in Jimi’s lungs and Thurston never documented wine anywhere in any legal document. Sharon Lawrence made up fake quotes, numbers, and dates in her fiction book. Sharon Lawrence said Jimi was obsessed with the number 9 and was a dedicated reader of occult books which he swallowed 9 pills in a suicide for the number 9. And this moron Flysquatter believes Sharon Lawrence’s fake Thurston date and fake second hand quote after she writes this bullshit account of Jimi Hendrix with the occult and the number 9. What a total dumbass Flysquatter is. And this is the woman he gets all his information from along with his hoaxing clown pal Bluster. You can’t make this shit up. That’s why we are all laughing our heads off while they troll with their nonsense. It’s pure comedy gold!”
Yes, Jason’s continued wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality is certainly pure comedy gold. Sharon Lawrence isn’t the only source that Buster and I are getting our information from. The information comes from multiple sources. Jack Meehan was the source of the quote from Dr. Thurston that “a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed” which Meehan got from Thurston on Sept. 29, 1970. Meehan relayed this info to Sharon and she kept record of it & published it later on. Jason knows this is only one of multiple testimonies that shoot down his “no wine” hoax & knowing that he can’t prove it false, Jason is left to only to be able to pull self- decreed fabrications out of his ass.
Jason continues with his wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality with his “No wine was ever found in Jimi’s lungs”, which doesn’t answer why Dr. Crompton told Kathy that Jimi couldn’t have been breathing when he arrived at the hospital because Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs (which completely dovetails with Dr. Bannister’s description of the treatment that was administered to Jimi during the 30 minute time frame stated in the hospital report), totally debunking Jason’s claim of “no wine was ever found in the lungs” and debunking Jason’s fairy tale of “no work was ever done on Hendrix”.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, says:
November 1, 2019 at 2:08 am
For the millionth time Siefert tells us no procedures were ever done on Hendrix. Doctors are not allowed to perform medical procedures on a 6 hour long dead corpse awaiting an autopsy. Mitch Mitchell was a great guy but got it wrong as he was not there being Dr. Siefert to know what was really going on.”
Neither Dr. Seifert, nor Dr. Brown stated that “no procedures were ever done on Hendrix” and never ever used those words. What they stated was Jimi couldn’t be saved. They are NOT implying that no treatment was ever done. It is only Jason that is implying that “no procedures were ever done on Hendrix” with no reference sources to back that up & only self-decreed fabrications that Jason pulls out of his ass.
The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” and no matter how much Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, it does not change or alter that fact that a resuscitation attempt was made and treatment was done for 30 minutes from 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Those are the documented facts that Jason’s lying misquotes can’t get around.
This 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book ‘Inside the Experience”, published in 1990, and that info was most likely gotten from the hospital report. Mitch doesn’t get anything wrong, as Jason tries to self-decree, because Jason can’t refute the 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame that is referenced in Mitch’s book.
Anybody can go to You Tube and watch the video “The Last 24 Hours” and if they watch closely, they will see the coroner’s form and see where it says “Unable to Resuscitate”.
None of Jason’s blather about “the hospital wouldn’t do this or that” can get around those documented facts.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, says:
November 1, 2019 at 2:08 am
Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, is a moron believing in his own make believe fairy tales that Jason repeatedly pulls out of his ass.”
^^FIXED !!
And Jason still can’t answer “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had too much to drink?”, if there was “no wine”, as Jason keeps claiming & his self-decreed BS about Dr. Brown citing the autopsy, only further proves Jason’s inability to answer that question.
The only one being laughed at is Jason with his continued wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
And to further illustrate Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder’s continued wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, we have this…………………
“BUSTER says: Even though Siefert and Bannister had no way to know how long Jimi was dead Jason once again dishonestly suggests they knew Jimi was dead for 6 hours…Jason knows they had no way to know how long Jimi was dead, but he enters that they knew he was dead for 6 hours anyway…
JASON says:
November 1, 2019 at 4:00 pm:
You’re lying again for the millionth time. Yes they knew Jimi was already dead for hours cuz they publicly stated he was.”
How could the doctors possibly know that Jimi was dead for 6 hours when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots? How could any medical team know how long a choking/drowning victim was in the state that he was, if there was nobody around to tell them who the victim was or tell them when the choking/drowning took place?
Does this blathering idiot named Jason think that the doctors that attended to Jimi had some sort of mental telepathy that told them that Jimi had been dead for 6-7 hours before the doctors even got close examination of Jim? I’ll let the readers decide, but of course, I already know what they are going to decide.
Jason is trying to depict that the doctors that attended to Jimi at Sept. 18, 1970 already knew that Jimi was dead for hours before they even close examined Jimi, and in doing so Jason exposes that he’s got the brain of a piss-ant.
Jason is too stupid to realize that if he’s going to be stupid enough to depict the doctors knew Jimi was dead for hours when Jimi first arrived at St. Mary Abbots, then he’d better be smart enough not to quote the attending doctor stating otherwise, as the bumbling idiot Jason does here:
“JASON says:
November 1, 2019 at 4:00 pm:
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert”
If the attending doctors knew that Jimi was dead for 6 hours, then why would they bother rushing him into a re-sus room?
ANSWER: They didn’t know that Jimi had been dead for 6 hours as this lying-denying pigbreeder named Jason depicts. They had NO WAY of knowing until after close examination and after a failed resuscitation attempt.
The autopsy report doesn’t even state how long Jimi had been dead for, and yet we have this derelict named Jason trying to sell us that the doctors knew that Jimi had been dead for hours upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots and before the doctors even got close examination of the patient they were treating.
Jason is clearly in need of being put in a straight-jacket and a padded cell to be willing to exhibit this type of public buffoonery
Jason’s idiocy is further illustrated by his depiction, in his desperate denial of reality, that Siefert’s quote is saying that “no procedures were done”. Seifert’s quote doesn’t say any such thing, it says “We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes”.
While it is true, what Seifert says about not working on Jimi for an hour, just how long were these “few minutes” that Seifert speaks of?
The hospital report tells us it was 30 minutes. The coroner’s Inquest form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate”, proving that procedures were done.
“JASON says:
November 1, 2019 at 4:00 pm:
This “wine removal” is a hoax. The instrument Bannister claimed he used would take hours to clear out wine from a body. Those instruments are delicate and not powerful cuz they are specifically designed not to destroy anything in the throat. All that wine removal would take hours to perform and several hundreds of attempts to suck out wine. Trying to get wine from the stomach would be even more impossible cuz you would need a different device.”
Next Jason will be telling us that 2+2=3. What an idiot.
Dr. Bannister said it was an 18-inch metal suctioning device. It’s reasonable to believe that such a device would hold 2 ounces (possibly 3) of fluid. If such a device were used twice every minute and with 4 ounces of fluid being withdrawn every minute, then we’d get 80 ounces of fluid withdrawn in a 20 minute span — the equivalent of 5 (five) 15.oz bottles of wine (a little more). Jason needs to go start kindergarten math over again.
Jason will never be able to answer Dr. Crompton telling Kathy that Jimi couldn’t have been breathing when he arrived at the hospital because Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid & yet the autopsy showed 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs (which completely dovetails with Dr. Bannister’s description of the treatment that was administered to Jimi during the 30 minute time frame stated in the hospital report), totally debunking Jason’s claim of “no wine was ever found in the lungs” and debunking Jason’s fairy tale of “no work was ever done on Hendrix.
And where did Dr. Crompton get the information about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid from? Most likely, from a written report, that was written back in Sept. of 1970.
Keep wallowing away, Jason.
Hi Ivana,
I don’t get these wine hoaxers. They demand that you answer their phony claims and after you do they still say you haven’t answered them. Then after you refute their phony claims they keep repeating them over and over.
What do you make of this?
Buster keeps claiming Siefert performed “procedures” on Jimi and Siefert testified that he never did. After you prove to Buster Siefert never did, he still repeats it over and over.
Buster also says Bannister didn’t know Jimi was dead for 6 hours. I show Buster where Bannister examined Jimi and Bannister said he was dead for hours in documented interviews. Then in the next comment Buster still said Bannister didn’t know. Something is wrong with him
You tell them hospitals don’t do strange procedures on a 6 hour long dead corpse they still argue that Jimi had them done. Hospitals don’t destroy bodily fluids either and they argue they did. That is an illegal act.
When you show Flysquatter that Dr. Brown was citing Teare’s autopsy results that determined that Jimi was slightly above the legal alcohol limit, the moron keeps asking the same questions. Seems obvious they are just trolling since they have nothing else left in the tank.
Hi Jason. The important thing is that Jimi’s death was caused by inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. That is the official verdict. These two don’t believe this no matter what evidence exists that Jimi was not murdered. What I don’t get is where are they getting this information because it contradicts the official record. It really doesn’t matter how many hours Jimi was dead for but all the doctors realised he had been dead for a while even the ambulance officers recognised this. During Kathy’s investigation the officers said they performed the only procedure necessary until they reached the hospital and then Jimi was placed in the care of Dr. Seifert where he pounded Jimi’s chest. It’s just crazy to think that the doctors would waste their time performing procedures on a dead man. It’s not done on a corpse dead for many hours. To think Jason the first time I read Buster’s comments I knew this was a massive lie it didn’t sound right at all. I think it’s like Dr Brenner said tin foil hatters see profundity in nonsense. They don’t know the truth at all and I think they invent and fabricate scenarios in order to convince others that they are the only ones who know the truth. How many times have we said that Michael Jeffrey was in Spain yet they still believe Jimi was murdered by him. Nothing we say will convince them otherwise. Both morons basically. Just look at the number of sites where Buster had been banned they didn’t believe him either; they thought he was a crackpot. They are both idiotic trolls.
Wine hoaxers have a problem here. They claim that the doctors did not know that Jimi Hendrix was dead for hours but we have ex Doctor Fraud Bannister telling us Jimi was dead for hours. In fact, he went into great detail about the condition of Hendrix’s body so he knew for sure Hendrix was dead for hours just by viewing it.
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital”- Ex Doctor Bannister
“The body was cold, there we no signs of circulation and my overall impression was he’d been dead for several hours. He was completely cold. I personally think he died long before. He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of somebody who had been dead for some time.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
Ex Doctor Bannister went into great detail about the condition of Hendrix’s dead body stating he was dead for several hours. So, then why would a doctor then claim to be “performing life saving procedures” on a 6 hour dead corpse? Creepy ex Doctor Bannister told us Jimi was dead for hours so he can’t be working on a dead body extracting fluids and then casually dumping it out down the drain. This is illegal and would not be allowed to go on inside a hospital. Other nurses and doctors would not be involved in destroying medical evidence from a dead corpse awaiting an autopsy. This stuff is insane. So, unless the wine hoaxers want to claim Hendrix was still alive they can’t claim phony “treatments” and “procedures” since no hospital would allow this except in a decades old B horror movie. Maybe ex Doctor Bannister watched one before he made his phony claims.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Dr. Martin Siefert comes to the rescue to knock down all these phony claims of phony “treatments” and “procedures”. Hendrix was dead for hours, there was nothing to treat like Dr. Siefert said. Then fraudulent wine hoaxers try to claim this upstanding doctor would destroy evidence and mutilate a corpse awaiting an autopsy. That is beyond shameful. Siefert testified that nothing more was done for Hendrix besides the basic formality. Wine hoaxers can’t get that through their saturated wine hoaxing brains. Siefert gave his honest account and wine hoaxers hate it cuz it destroys their phony hoax. Well, that is just too bad for them.
“Hendrix did not have an obstruction of the airways. What he had, was that he had a drowning of the airways.” – ex Doctor Bannister
I talked about this before, but this is well deserving of an honorable mention. Ex Doctor Bannister is telling us that no phony “hard plug of vomit” ever existed since Bannister claimed Jimi had a “drowning of the airways” and not an obstruction. A hard plug of vomit is definitely an obstruction, so wine hoaxers can no longer claim a “hard plug of vomit” since their pal Fraud Bannister refutes their phony claim.
Frauds refuting frauds…..gotta love it!
Hi Jason. Are you reading what is being said below. All the doctors and ambulance officers recognised that Jimi had been dead for a while. Kathy’s investigation established that Jimi died in the early hours of the morning by the presence of rice in Jimi’ stomach discovered during the autopsy. Buster writes about the doctors trying to save a dead victim when they all said Jimi was beyond help and there was very little they could do for him. These two believe that the doctors would spend any time resuscitating a dead patient. This is so weird. How could the doctors observe a hard plug of vomit just by looking at Jimi. Dr Thurston never spoke about witnessing any wine. The wine scenario came about because of Wright’s book it just did not exist back then. These two are concocting a false scenario around that waterboarding story to prove the existence of wine. These two are giving their version of events to accommodate the presence of wine. In the account I read no doctors mention copious amounts of wine being evident in or around Jimi and this was not present in any great quantity at the autopsy if it was the coroner would have stated that on the death certificate and cited this as cause of death along with the barbiturate levels. The two hoaxers are writing a story around the presence of wine to prove it existed. They firmly believe Jimi was waterboarded to death and their postings reflect just that. It is not fact it is a story invented to prove the existence of wine. Imagine believing that a corpse contained five bottles of wine extracted by Dr. Bannister when it is illegal to tamper with a dead body before the coroner as this would destroy vital evidence. That is standard procedure and not anything Buster and Co., would have you believe. The autopsy clearly proved that Jimi’s death was caused by the high level of barbiturate in his system and Dr Crompton reiterated this by saying that Jimi’s liver was so congested that he could not have survived. But because these two believe Jimi was murdered they refuse to believe any of it and create stories of deception, subterfuge and dishonesty. This is the truth according to two tin foil hatters not to be mistaken for the real course of events that morning. Welcome to the Twilight Zone.
Hi Ivana,
The wine trolls Bluster and Flysquatter are desperate for wine and use any ridiculous scenario for imaginary wine. The fake “hard plug of vomit” was invented so these wine trolls can still claim wine. Thurston never spoke of wine, that was a fake second hand quote in Sharon Lawrence’s fiction book. No hospital would allow doctors to do work on a dead corpse awaiting an autopsy that’s been dead for 6 hours. They also would not allow doctors to remove bodily fluids and illegally dump it out. The wine hoaxers phony case rests on Bannister doing Frankenstein procedures on a dead 6 hour Hendrix dumping out imaginary wine. This whole thing is a ridiculous farce and no documentation exists. None of this stuff ever happened. Wine trolls can never produce any documented evidence. Bannister is a fraud and there always has to be some gullible idiot to believe in nonsense like these 2 clowns Bluster and Flysquatter. We all laugh at them.
Hi Jason. You need to check out this site The Sound Hound Lounge both Scrum Drum (Buster) and Flyswatter have been members since 2015. They’re both peddling the same things that are here using the same arguments. The also follow each other like they do here. Read what Chris Scott and Peteryvee have to say in particular. The host is a man called Scott Peterson and he found it necessary to issue a warning. Basically no one believes what they have to say either. They both infiltrate Hendrix sites trying to monopolise them with their theories and they are certainly not new to this game. Someone even thought that were the same person.
Hi Ivana, is this the post from the site you are talking about? This could be Buster using an alias. I’ve read on another site that Buster uses alias accounts to agree with himself since nobody else will. He needs mental help and is a troll who goes on different websites to push this bogus hoax.
Peteyvee
I have a new theory: new members Flyswatter and Scrum Drum are either the same person (which is against TGP rules, by the way) or both are acquainted via some Hendrix “truther” website, found this thread by a google search and revived it… I could probably prove it, but I’m busy watching the Colts and Patsies.
Jason is seeking attention in order to feed his trolling…All he is doing here is seeking ways to deny the evidence so he isn’t really credible and therefore he doesn’t really deserve any serious answer…He ignores good evidence…
Everything Jason writes has some kind of deceptive content…Above Jason tries to conflate the context of Siefert and Bannister’s witnessing in to knowledge of Jimi being dead for 6 hours…Jason dishonestly tries to stretch quotes from Bannister and Siefert in to meaning they knew Jimi was dead for 6 hours at the hospital…But a closer look at those quotes and their true context shows the dishonest intent of Jason and falseness of what he posts…
The dirty trick Jason tries to get away with above is stretching Dr Bannister’s quotes that Jimi had been dead for some time in to meaning he had knowledge at St Mary’s that Jimi had been dead for 6 hours…Jason dishonestly takes quotes from 1991 and 2009 and infers that they were from 1970…Jason doesn’t inform you that Bannister’s saying Jimi was dead for a long time came from Bannister’s years-long summation and evaluation of the event over the years…Jason does this dishonest trick because he’s trying to lie around the fact that at the time, when Jimi ended up on Siefert and Bannister’s emergency room table, they had no idea how long Jimi had been dead…The signs that Jimi was dead, that Jason cites, are things that Bannister observed in the process of trying to revive him…Bannister was doing what he was trained to do and was applying “first aid”…That first aid involved Siefert clearing the airway followed by Siefert and Bannister removing 5 bottles of wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach…Jason is a liar because the things he quotes Bannister as saying came from his overall understanding of what happened after he had failed to save Jimi and then added up all he had witnessed in his head…Jason is falsely trying to say that this post-memory pre-empted Jimi’s treatment when the evidence in no way allows that…
The crime Jason is trying to get away with here is applying that post-treatment memory to a pre-treatment situation…Jason has to be either really stupid or really crazy to think he could get away with that in front of intelligent people…What we are talking about is what Siefert and Bannister witnessed when it happened and how they reacted to it…Siefert suddenly had Jimi in front of him and realized he had a hard plug of vomit blocking his throat…Siefert removed it, like any competent doctor would, because at the time he had no idea if Jimi’s heart had stopped just seconds before he received him…Jason keeps citing standard medical procedure…Well, Siefert’s attempt to clear an airway and revive Jimi IS that standard operating procedure…When Siefert cleared that hard plug of vomit Bannister arrived in time to see the wine that was unblocked behind it and they both went to work…Siefert and Bannister went to work, like they were trained to do, and proceeded to remove that unusually large amount of wine…Like the trained professionals they were they focused on removing the wine because that was the main thing that was preventing their attempt to resuscitate…As Bannister recounted, it took them 20 minutes to remove the wine because the stomach full of wine Dr Thurston spoke of, according to Bannister, keep refilling the lungs every time they cleared them…
Jason has entered a false account here and has badly misrepresented what really happened…According to what Siefert and Bannister knew, when they made the decisions they did at the time, they had no way to know how long Jimi was dead and dutifully practiced the standard medical operating procedures Jason refers to but then doesn’t accurately relate when it comes to the true scenario…Truth is Siefert and Bannister did exactly what they were trained to do and what those standard medical practices called for…They tried to save the victim first and then figure out what happened later…That’s their job…To suggest that knowledge that Bannister surmised after the event from quotes decades later somehow applies to the event as it happened real time is a despicable and intentional violation of context for the purposeful motive of deceit…
Jason is a sick person who is obviously unable to answer the evidence of Dr Siefert saying Jimi was covered in wine…Since there is no reasonable explanation for Jimi to be soaked in wine from any normal choking on vomit overdose death, the only plausible explanation for the wine is it is evidence of wine spilled in the act of pouring it down Jimi’s throat…Jason is lying when he says no treatment was done on Jimi at St Mary’s…The Hospital Report proves Jason is lying because it states “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15″…Lastly, if Jason’s false scenario were true Scotland Yard would have found the nurses and had them say Siefert’s version was the correct one…That no treatment was done on Jimi and there was no removal of 5 bottles of wine from his lungs and stomach…But that’s not what they did and every indication shows they went out of their way not to…It is a sure sign of guilt and sure sign of Scotland Yard knowing that the nurses would categorically confirm Dr Bannister’s witnessing so therefore they avoided them…
What Jason is doing here goes beyond internet trolling and enters the range of the criminal…We need to find out who he is and expose him and hold him accountable…
“JASON , the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 2, 2019 at 3:15 am
When you show Flysquatter that Dr. Brown was citing Teare’s autopsy results that determined that Jimi was slightly above the legal alcohol limit, the moron keeps asking the same questions. Seems obvious they are just trolling since they have nothing else left in the tank.’
TRANSLATED: Jason has no answer to what I posted that proved his statement of “Dr. Brown was citing Teare’s autopsy results that determined that Jimi was slightly above the legal alcohol limit” to be nothing but a self-decreed fabrication that Jason took well over a week to dig out of his own ass.
Once again, just for Jason………….it’s already been proven that there is no way possible that Dr. Brown could have been citing the autopsy when Brown made reference to Jimi having “a bit too much to drink”, as the autopsy states Jimi’s blood alcohol content was .005% and that what Dr. Teare was talking about regarding 100mg was only an estimation at the time of Vesperax ingestion. Dr. Brown has never made reference to the autopsy data at any time, anywhere. Dr. Brown was citing what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots — there is no other possibility.
Jason continues to show his ignorance by repeatedly claiming “no wine” and then trying to refer to the 100mg estimate by Dr. Teare to try to support his lie about Dr. Brown citing the autopsy report.
Jason proves that the only moron here is Jason & he has “nothing else left in the tank”, but to post this same self-decreed fabrication that Jason took well over a week to dig out of his own ass. And he does that because he can’t answer “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had too much to drink”, if there was “no wine” as Jason keeps saying.
Self-decreed fabrications that Jason pulls out of his ass don’t constitute answers, as Jason tries to falsely claim — they only constitute his inability to provide a legit answer.
Hey Buster…..
We’ve seen Jason repeatedly blather that “the ambulance attendants didn’t see any wine”.
But when you click this link and go to the bottom of the page, read what Michael Fairchild says:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell2.html
Notice at the bottom of the page Fairchild says in blue text:
“Doctors and attendants who handled Jimi’s body recall him being covered with a large amount of red wine”.
It raises the obvious question:
Why would Fairchild — who was there in the early 1990’s speaking directly to these people — publish that statement, if there was no wine witnessed by these men, as Jason keeps self-decreeing?
Of course, the correct answer is that they all saw the wine & Jason is a blatant liar with his self- decree of “no wine” & Jason just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
Also on that page, when we look at Dr. Seifert’s statement, he also says:
“After we worked on Jimi – we didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix until later on – I remember just a vague memory of a bit of fuss going on in admissions, but it could have been anything, it was a casualty ward.”
Notice the words “After we worked on Jimi”? And yet we have Jason claiming that Seifert is saying that “no treatment was done” & Jason obviously omitting that part of Seifert’s statement, because Seifert is telling us that they did work on Jimi. And the hospital report that has “Time of Treatment: 11:45AM to 12:15PM”, written on it that was most likely written by the Medical Registrar — none other than Dr. Seifert.
More whining from the wine troll who thinks Bannister did treatments on a dead 6 hour body. No hospital in the world would ever do that except in decades old B horror movies. Your long commentaries are boring and is just garbage spin to feed your delusion. Your hoax has been exposed and you’ve been exposed as a fraud. You and your goofy sidekick have zero credibility. You already claimed I was some guy named Ed somebody. Just another example of what a lunatic you are with zero credibility. Go find your imaginary wine that doesn’t exist. Fraud Bannister is a fraud just like you. 9 years posting and you’ve got nothing except to make up new fake stories in your crazy head.
More garbage from a wine troll.
Hospitals don’t work on a 6 hour dead corpse or remove bodily fluids and dump it out. That is illegal
Buster’s hoax has been exposed as a fraud.
All the doctors knew Hendrix was dead for hours. They all testified to it.
Buster has no medical record of any of these “treatments”. Nothing exists.
Brown and Siefert said it never happened. We have all their testimony but this wine hoaxer Buster ignores it and pushes his bogus debunked hoax.
Pathetic.
No evidence exists and this phony wine hoax is finished.
“JASON says:
November 2, 2019 at 3:20 am
Wine hoaxers have a problem here. They claim that the doctors did not know that Jimi Hendrix was dead for hours but we have ex Doctor Fraud Bannister telling us Jimi was dead for hours. In fact, he went into great detail about the condition of Hendrix’s body so he knew for sure Hendrix was dead for hours just by viewing it.”
No, Jason is the one with the problem, here.
First, Jason is trying to depict that there was no treatment done on Jimi because the doctors knew Jimi was dead for 6 hours when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots before the doctors closely examined Jimi.
Next we get Jason saying Bannister knew for sure Hendrix was dead for hours “just by viewing it”.
Can’t have it both ways, DUMBASS.
“JASON says:
November 2, 2019 at 3:20 am
Frauds refuting frauds…..gotta love it!”
Yeah, nice job of Jason refuting himself. We do indeed love it. The usual paradox of these lying-denying pigbreeders that wallow in their own pigshit mire of denial of reality (Jason and Ivana) — they always screw up and refute themselves.
And next we have this bit of laughable buffoonery:
“JASON says:
November 2, 2019 at 3:20 am
Dr. Martin Siefert comes to the rescue to knock down all these phony claims of phony “treatments” and “procedures”. Hendrix was dead for hours, there was nothing to treat like Dr. Siefert said. Then fraudulent wine hoaxers try to claim this upstanding doctor would destroy evidence and mutilate a corpse awaiting an autopsy. That is beyond shameful. Siefert testified that nothing more was done for Hendrix besides the basic formality. Wine hoaxers can’t get that through their saturated wine hoaxing brains. Siefert gave his honest account and wine hoaxers hate it cuz it destroys their phony hoax. Well, that is just too bad for them.”
Dr. Seifert comes to the rescue, huh? Does Jason mean the same Dr. Seifert who, as the Medical Registrar, is most likely the person who wrote “Time of Treatment: 11:45AM to 12:15PM” on the hospital report?
The same Dr. Seifert that was caught on video saying Jimi was covered in red wine?
As for Seifert’s statement of “there was no point in doing anything else”, he’s not saying that “no treatment” was done, as Jason tries to depict. Those words were most likely Seifert’s response to what he was shown in the book Electric Gypsy about a tracheotomy not being performed & we have proof Seifert was shown Electric Gypsy right here:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell2.html
And again, because Jason can’t answer or refute it………
The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” and no matter how much Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, it does not change or alter that fact that a resuscitation attempt was made and treatment was done for 30 minutes from 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Those are the documented facts that Jason’s lying misquotes can’t get around.
This 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book ‘Inside the Experience”, published in 1990, and that info was most likely gotten from the hospital report. Mitch doesn’t get anything wrong, as Jason tries to self-decree, because Jason can’t refute the 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame that is referenced in Mitch’s book.
Anybody can go to You Tube and watch the video “The Last 24 Hours” and if they watch closely, they will see the coroner’s form and see where it says “Unable to Resuscitate”.
None of Jason’s blather about “the hospital wouldn’t do this or that” can get around those documented facts.
This is worthy of reiteration………..
We’ve seen Jason repeatedly blather that “the ambulance attendants didn’t see any wine”.
But when you click this link and go to the bottom of the page, read what Michael Fairchild says:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell2.html
Notice at the bottom of the page Fairchild says in blue text:
“Doctors and attendants who handled Jimi’s body recall him being covered with a large amount of red wine”.
It raises the obvious question:
Why would Fairchild — who was there in the early 1990’s speaking directly to these people — publish that statement, if there was no wine witnessed by these men, as Jason keeps self-decreeing?
Of course, the correct answer is that they all saw the wine & Jason is a blatant liar with his self- decree of “no wine” & Jason just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
Also on that page, when we look at Dr. Seifert’s statement, he also says:
“After we worked on Jimi – we didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix until later on – I remember just a vague memory of a bit of fuss going on in admissions, but it could have been anything, it was a casualty ward.”
Notice the words “After we worked on Jimi”? And yet we have Jason claiming that Seifert is saying that “no treatment was done” & Jason obviously omitting that part of Seifert’s statement, because Seifert is telling us that they did work on Jimi. And the hospital report that has “Time of Treatment: 11:45AM to 12:15PM”, written on it that was most likely written by the Medical Registrar — none other than Dr. Seifert.
If there were “no treatment done”, as Jason keeps trying to delude himself with this self-decreed fabrication pulled out of his ass, then Seifert never uses those words “After we worked on Jimi”. Seifert clearly states that they did work on Jimi.
Jason can’t claim that Fairchild is making this up to sell a book, because that site has been up on web and free for anyone to read for well over a decade.
On page 147 of Tony Brown’s ‘Hendrix The Final Days’ Brown says Les Perrin said Jimi was admitted to St Mary’s at 11:45…On the same page Brown mentioned that Jimi was officially declared dead at 12:45…It appears he learned that from Stickells who identified the body…Those are the precise hospital entry and declaration of death times listed on the Hospital Report so somebody obviously had access to them…Most likely Brown obtained a copy…
On Page 144 Monika says Jimi purchased a bottle of red and a bottle of white wine on the day of his death…She then says Jimi drank a bottle of white wine at the Samarkand that evening…She’s lying of course and trying to cover up the wine Jimi drank at Harvey’s party where she acted suspiciously…At Harvey’s Monika showed a true hatred for Jimi by screaming at him that he was a fucking pig and also trying too hard to get him out of there and back to the Samarkand, so she lied in order to cover-up that visit to Harvey’s…Was Monika desperate to get Jimi back to the Samarkand because she was under the direct control and orders of Michael Jeffery who was nearby?…In any case, there is no doubt there was wine at the flat that night because Monika told of it not to Sharon Lawrence but to the reporter Brown cites…And if they intended to create a false death scenario involving drowning in wine there’s no doubt the murderers probably brought their own supply too…
Jason pretends to be sensitive to lies but he avoids criticizing the biggest liar in this whole mess, Monika Dannemann…Even Jason admits she’s lying but he then doesn’t further admit that the entire accidental choking on vomit overdose scenario originated from Monika…Jason’s huge efforts here are designed to get him around the fact that Jimi was witnessed by the ambulance men in the same position he obviously died in with no one attempting to assist him by wiping the vomit off and trying to clear his throat and get him breathing…It doesn’t take a Sherlock Holmes to realize that the reason Jimi was left in the position he died in was because everyone involved that morning knew he was murdered and there was no point…It’s called criminal circumstantial evidence and that is what you are seeing there…Even Monika admitted in her official story that she was awake at 5:30am so there is just no excuse for no one trying to help Jimi…This circumstantial evidence creates the true context of what went on there and it tells you those involved were desperately cleaning up murder evidence…If Jimi was murdered by having wine poured down his throat until he drowned and reacted by excessively vomiting, and the people involved knew and were trying to cover it up, what the ambulance men witnessed is exactly what you would see…It is incredibly stupid for anyone to not realize that if Monika was awake and this happened (which I proved it could not have because 9 Vesparax will not create that result in a person with a high tolerance in only 1 or 2 hours) that there’s no way she would not try to do some basic life saving assistance by trying to get Jimi to breathe…No person would let Jimi die like that in front of them…It is even more stupid to make excuses for Monika by saying she panicked and froze and didn’t know what to do…Anyone who understands the true scenario I just spelled-out would understand cool and calculating Monika was not a person who would do that and was just the opposite personality type who was chosen exactly because she could be depended on to effectively cover it up…So while pretending to be a person who points-out lies, Jason looks the other way on the worst liar of anyone and the significance of her lies towards the evidence…Funny that when Kathy went to Scotland Yard they also showed disinterest in the partner of one of their own MI-6 agents who participated in a major political assassination…
To add to that………..
Kathy noted that the people who were there at the Samarkand that morning such Stickells, Burdon, Barrett, Slater were all totally reluctant to talk to the authorities during her investigation in the early 1990’s. Why would they be reluctant to talk to the authorities if there was no foul play involved? And why did they just leave Jimi’s body to be found hours later with massive amounts of dried vomit?
Monika’s Opel sports car was sitting right outside that Samarkand flat, so that means they already had a way of transporting Jimi to the hospital. Why didn’t they get Jimi on his feet and put him into that Opel sports car & take him to a nearby hospital? Why was Jimi just left for dead like that 5-6 hours, to have the ambulance men find him in the state that they did, if there was no foul play?
The gurgling gas sounds Suau said he heard inside Jimi were caused by the wine that filled Jimi’s body…The reason Suau mentioned it was because it was more pronounced than usual because Jimi had his insides filled with wine unlike other victims…That’s why he made the gurgling noises just like anyone or any thing that was filled with wine…It is subtle evidence that Jason misses because of his simplistic denial…
More nonsense. This is normal for people who die. Has nothing to do with wine. Pathetic wine trolls look for any bogus excuse for their imaginary wine but always come up empty citing their innacurate books.
Jason, of course, is lying and we could consult medical experts and they would tell us if a dead body was filled with wine that was forced in to the lungs and stomach that it would be more likely to make noticeable gurgling noises like Suau noticed to the point he thought it deserved mention…They shifted Jimi’s body when they moved him to the ambulance and the wine inside him started making gurgling noises…
Also, if Jimi had this forceful insult to his digestive system his bowels would be more likely to expel like Suau also noticed and commented on…Both the gurgling noises and release of the bowels were obviously direct results of the wine that was bloating Jimi’s lungs and stomach…It is silly to try to deny this or say it was normal…
If we consulted medical experts and asked them if normal barbiturate overdose choking on vomit deaths resulted in such bodily events they would advise that, no, they did not…This is why the excessive vomiting, gurgling noises, and release of the bowels and bladder are all direct forensic evidence of the violent action of forced drowning in wine…
Buster the lying fraud is caught again pushing his bogus hoax and has been refuted again by John Saua.
“When we moved him the gasses were gurgling. You get that when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant.” – John Saua
John Saua has told us this is normal when someone has died. Saua never said anything about wine or Jimi being drowned in it. Buster the fraud is trying to push his hoax to still pathetically claim wine.
This is also evidence of Jimi being dead for several hours which means the doctors were well aware of this when Hendrix arrived at the hospital.
This also proves that no “procedures” were performed on Hendrix since this is clear evidence of Hendrix being dead for several hours. So, Buster the clown has pathetically lied yet again when he claims “the doctors didn’t know Hendrix was dead for hours.” Well, this is clear evidence of it.
Buster the clown thought he was being clever trying to invent a new phony story for his bogus hoax. Instead he ended up debunking his phony hoax, proving himself to be a liar, and proving me right once again. What a clownish moron.
Hi Ivana,
Here is another contradicting quote from Buster. Before Buster was saying Bannister did all the work himself and now he lied and changed it to Siefert doing the work and Bannister was just a bystander. This business of wine gushing out is a joke. The human body doesn’t work that way. I guess the wine hoaxers want to make it really dramatic. Anybody who believes this nonsense needs mental help. Have you read anything so ridiculous before? How do you like how Buster changes his fake stories once the original gets debunked?
BUSTER says: Doctor Bannister specifically said that after he had uncorked the plug of vomit in Hendrix’s windpipe that a large amount of wine was released and gushed out.
Hi Jason. In Buster’s imaginary world anything is possible. He is now using the gurgling noises as another excuse to justify the presence of wine even though this is like you said Jason part of the death process. He now needs to invent even more outrageous scenarios since his older claims have been debunked. LOL.
Pathetic isn’t it? Buster the clown didn’t realize that his new phony claim debunks his claim of “the doctors didn’t know Jimi was dead for hours”. All of Jimi bowels and bladder spilling in the ambulance proves the doctors knew he was dead for hours. That means no “procedures” were ever performed on Hendrix as a dead corpse.
Buster the wine troll hilariously continues to debunk his own phony claims.
Buster pretends to write in an “authoritative tone” like he is an “expert” and his junior sidekick Hoaxer Flysquatter parrots his nonsense by repeating the same nonsense over and over. They have both been caught lying, changing stories, and making up brand new bogus claims on the spot. No real claim has this many story changes and no evidence to provide when we ask them for it.
All the readers can see they are perpetrating a hoax and are just making it up as they go along. They both provide pure comedy for all to read.
Wine hoaxers always demand that we answer their made up phony claims but never once answer the pertinent questions to their phony claims that they continuously hide from. That’s cuz they have no real answers for their phony claims.
They have been thoroughly defeated on everything they have tried to use, so now they resort to insignificant nonsense to still feebly make their bogus claim.
Wine hoaxers still have no answer for why doctors would be doing long “prodedures” on a 6 hour long dead Jimi Hendrix corpse. Hendrix was already dead at the flat as testified to by both ambulance men and the police. They all said nothing could be done for Hendrix. Hendrix was declared dead on arrival when he reached the hospital so no long “procedures” would be performed on a 6 hour long dead corpse.
What do these two clowns expect “treatments” would have done for Jimi? What would be the the point? Do these two morons think Jimi would wake up and start singing “Hey Joe”? They never answer this, but continue on with their garbage of phony treatments were performed when no written documentation ever exists of these treatments happening.
Both doctors Martin Siefert and Bob Brown said no revival was possible and nothing more was done for Hendrix besides the basic resuscitation formality attempt which is required. Doctors are not going to spend time on a dead corpse. Dr. Siefert was telling the truth and Bannister was making up bogus stories in 1992 to the present.
Creepy ex Doctor Bannister has already told us that Jimi was already dead for hours. He said Jimi was cold dead and blue with no circulation going through his body. With this revelation, that means no work was performed on Hendrix in this condition. Hospitals don’t perform weird medical procedures on a dead corpse for 6 hours. Buster the clown and his junior sidekick Hoaxer Flysquatter never can answer this.
Buster repeats the asinine comment over and over that “doctors would not know that Jimi Hendrix was dead for hours”. Lame bogus excuse that is laughable. Terrible trolling job by Buster. These are doctors. They went to medical school. This is their job to estimate how long a body has been dead. When Bannister witnessed a cold blue dead body with a black rotting mouth he could determine Hendrix was dead for hours. Even the average Joe could tell you that. So, Buster once again has failed to provide a real answer for why creepy ex Doctor Bannister would perform weird medical procedures on a 6 hour dead corpse. Buster has no answer which is why he made up a lame ridiculous excuse in his crazy head.
Next Buster went with an even more absurd excuse that had everyone rolling on the floor in laughter. Buster said that “the doctors didn’t know Jimi was dead for hours cuz Kathy Etchingham didn’t do her investigation yet”. WTF? Buster sure didn’t take enough time to come up with this crap. This ridiculous claim puts this moron to shame. What the hell does Kathy have to do with determining how long Hendrix was dead for? She wasn’t there in 1970. The doctors were and they were telling her what they witnessed back in 1970. Plus Bannister wasn’t giving his interview to Kathy when he told how Hendrix was dead for hours. So, Buster uses this total bogus lame excuse that makes him look like more of an idiot than he already is. This proves Buster has no answers since he used two asinine claims for an answer he can not truthfully answer for us. He has been defeated.
Another thing is this dumping out bodily fluids down the drain that came out of Jimi Hendrix’s body. Hendrix was awaiting an autopsy so no weird medical procedures would be done on his body. No hospital would allow this to ever happen. No doctor is allowed to remove anything from a dead corpse awaiting an autopsy and destroying medical evidence since that destroys the pending autopsy. These wine trolls have zero answers for this one except to keep spouting off “11:45 to 12:15 treatment time” that they got out of another book. All their garbage evidence comes from these books that have false information. We have two doctors telling us on record that no “treatments” happened and Bannister told us Hendrix’s condition of his decomposing body. That information is not in the book. So, what the doctors have told us makes the book irrelevant since the doctors debunk what the book claims.
The book never says Hendrix was a 6 hour long dead corpse. The book never says Hendrix was dead on arrival. The book never has doctors saying “nothing could be done for Hendrix”. But we have these two wine trolls playing word games saying it did happen. Well, these two trolls have no medical documents listing a wine removal and they never will since no record ever exists. This means it never happened since hospitals document everything.
There are also sources that stated Gerry Stickells identified Hendrix’s body straight up at 12 noon. That fully confirms no “treatments” were being performed. Siefert and Brown already stated there wasn’t.
Buster the clown for years originally told us this “brutal wine drowning” happened with wine all over the place. After I demolished his hoax, he had to downgrade his fake “wine drowning” by claiming “super absorbent bedding” soaked up all the wine only leaving vomit behind and that “vomit means wine’. Lame words games and downgrading his fake claim proves he was hoaxing you all along. Real events never change but Buster the clown in fear and desperation dramatically reduced his claim that I totally demolished and he knows it. Not much of a wine drowning when all the wine magically disappears after he claimed it was flooded all over. That ends this phony hoax right rhere.
Bannister himself debunks the fake “hard plug of vomit” claim after he tells us Jimi had a drowning of the airways. A plug is an obstruction and Bannister said there never was one. So, this fake claim goes out in the trash can.
Wine hoaxers claimed 5 bottles of wine was poured into Jimi but can now only come up with one. Another story change for this hoax. They keep wanting to tell us “Jimi was covered in wine” but the ambulance men only said vomit. The wine hoaxers can’t say “vomit means wine” when Bannister and wine hoaxers are claiming “pure wine” was on Hendrix. John Saua and and Reginal Jones saw Hendrix dead first and never ever witnessed “pure wine” anywhere on Jimi or the bed. All they graphically described was vomit. So, they claim a “wine covered Jimi” but abandoned a “wine drowned “Jimi flooding his lungs since they only have 1 wine bottle but still try to claim a “wine removal” was performed. Their hoax has all these gaps and changing of fake claims that are all over the place. It’s a total joke and a farce. When you call these clowns out on it they attack you, swear at you, say you are trolling, but never give any answers. Just more smoke and mirrors from these fools. The readers are well aware of their phony game and can see they have no real evidence but only fake claims.
Finally, the wine hoaxers want us to believe their fairy tale based on quotes and claims. There is not one word about “wine” on any medical document on Jimi Hendrix period. Not one can these clowns point to and say there is wine. So, they invent or parrot alternate stories for their phony claim. If all this wine truly existed, it would have officially been documented at the hospital. It would clearly have said “Hendrix was drowned in wine and we made this attempt to clear out wine”. This doesn’t exist cuz it never happened. The hospital said it was a drug overdose. Wine hoaxers have no answer why they wouldn’t list wine when they claim it happened. It didn’t happen that’s why it was an overdose.
Dr. Thurston correctly determined Hendrix’s cause of death and never mentioned wine anywhere. If he knew about wine like the hoaxers falsely claim, he would have stated it. No wine existed. Buster the clown tells us Teare had no idea about wine since Bannister dumped it out. Buster is an idiot since Hospitals don’t dump out bodily fluids down the drain from a dead corpse. Buster is also an idiot since a wine soaked body from the insides would still show wine during forensic analysis. The wine would never go away and the analysis would still determine it. No wine was ever found anywhere. Zero documentation of wine anywhere. Hoaxers have only claims and no medical record documents to show any wine. This is why Buster is a hoaxing idiot.
Yes, folks this is all a hoax. When you ask for documented proof from wine from these wine clowns, all we get is lame excuses and alternate stories. This ultimately proves this is a hoax. Until they can provide documented evidence of wine they will forever lose their phony wine myth.
Jason is a troll who found this comments section and learned about the topic for the first time from it…If we could find out who Jason is and look at his true background in this subject we would even further understand that Jason is not here for honest purposes nor is he or his person credible…I on the other hand am a well researched expert who has done extensive research and interviews…Jason calls out to a fantasy audience that doesn’t exist and tells us they are laughing at me…
Jason has contrived an idiotic argument that Jimi was dead for 6 hours so therefore Dr’s Siefert and Bannister did no treatments on Jimi…Jason has been repeatedly shown that Siefert admitted he “worked on Jimi” and the Hospital Report recorded a half hour treatment time from 11:45 to 12:15…Unlike Jason, I actually met and interviewed Dr Bannister and he told me Siefert was right next to him for that recorded half hour…But even more importantly we have already repeatedly told Jason that Siefert and Bannister had no way to know how long Jimi was dead when he showed up on their emergency room table, so they did their duty and tried to save him because under the circumstances, at the moment, they had no way to know if Jimi’s heart had stopped seconds before they hooked him up to the monitor…Jason has dismissed himself from credibility and the fact he thinks he is getting away with his idiotic 6 hour dead canard instead of answering this shows how uncredible he is…He’s just going to repeat his 6 hour dead claim no matter what he sees and in doing that he disqualifies himself from credible debate…
Jason is lying when he says “No documentation exists for any treatment of Jimi”…The Hospital Report lists “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15” and therefore confirms Bannister’s claimed half hour as well as confirming Siefert’s not telling the truth…The nurses Scotland Yard criminally avoided would have verified Bannister (which is why Scotland Yard avoided them)…
Jason once again focuses on dishonest semantics and ripping things out of context…In now way did Siefert or Brown mean that no attempt to resuscitate was done on Jimi when they said no revival was possible…Both those comments were from decades later and both were based on hindsight…Jason dishonestly tries to portray those comments to mean Siefert and Brown immediately determined that day that no revival was possible…Jason is lying when he ignores that the true context of those statements was in the sense that after taking 20 minutes to suction the wine and clear the airways, plus another 10 minutes for a failed attempt to ventilate, that in hindsight, years later, it was determined that no revival was possible…Jason is lying when he dishonestly tries to switch context to that morning…And he is lying when he contends those dishonestly-misconstrued statements indicate that Jimi was never worked on…
Jason is lying and the true context was Dr Bannister was emphasizing that the accusations by Monika Dannemann, that he was responsible for Jimi’s death by failing to do a tracheostomy, was provably wrong because Jimi had obviously been dead for hours…What Jason is avoiding admitting is Bannister was correct about Jimi being dead for hours, just like he was correct about suctioning 5 bottles of wine from his lungs and stomach, just like he was correct about the half hour treatment time, and just like he was correct about wine soaking Jimi that was also confirmed by Dr Siefert…Jason enthusiastically seeks one of the lowest roles you can take in human existence as a government murder defender against a person who was horrifically murdered by the system…Jason is an evil-loving servant of Satan and dirty rat…
Jason violates common basic medical procedure…Lungs full of fluid takes precedent over darkened cyanosed cheek lining tissue…Jason ignores that persons have been brought back to life with similar symptoms so his painfully transparent attempt to con us around the correct evidence once again fails badly while he ignores the easily-explained evidence…The doctors were trying to establish an airway as a first priority and none of Jason’s idiotic, childish trolling changes that…
Jason is publicly stupid because it was Kathy in 1992 who got Crompton to confirm Jimi died at 5:30am…The knowledge that Jimi was dead for 6 hours did not come until 1992 when Crompton said that…So Jason is mocking himself…All Siefert & Bannister knew at 11:45am on 9-18 is they had a patient for whom priority first aid required establishing an airway…No matter how many times Jason stupidly tries to troll the false context of Siefert & Bannister knowing Jimi was dead for 6 hours at 11:45am 9-18, this truth doesn’t change and Siefert and Bannister clearly did the right thing and did what they were trained to do…
Jason tries to get away with a moronically primitive hand-wave about “those books”, but closer examination will see those books were written by the best experts on the subject who, unlike Jason who restricts his involvement to trolling Velvet Rocket, actually did extensive research and accessed important documents…The persons who wrote those books accessed the Hospital Report and got the 11:45 to 12:15 treatment time from it…That half hour treatment time was verified by Dr Bannister…If we could produce that Hospital Report it will say “Treatment Time – 11:45am to 12:15pm”…
Jason stupidly ignores that his source for the official story, Monika Dannemann, said there was a long treatment time at St Mary Abotts for Jimi…The Hospital Report would not say 11:45 to 12:15 if Stickells identified the body at noon (duh)…All that is is Jason throwing more garbage in for purposes of obfuscation and confusion…
Jason is stupidly in denial of the reality that we could take wine-soaked vomit and throw it on the same exact bedding and it would mostly dry up after 6 hours after the wine had soaked in to the bedding materials…This is a fact Jason’s stupid scoffing doesn’t escape or credibly answer to…Jason is in stupid denial that if Siefert said Jimi was covered in red wine then that means he had to be covered in red wine at the Samarkand…It can’t be any other way…Jason dismisses himself from being taken seriously by trying to ignore this and answering it with scoffing…
Jason is trolling for effect when he says “Bannister said there was no plug of vomit”…He knows Banister never said that but he’s throwing it in there anyway in order to increase the effect of his idiotic trolling…Since I spoke to Bannister in person, and Jason is just an annoying Velvet Rocket troll, what Bannister said (and Jason has already had this explained to him) is Siefert got there first…The reason Bannister never mentions the plug of vomit is because Siefert removed it before he got there and all he saw was wine in the throat…Jason continues to offer the obnoxious material of a 12 year old…Jason is lying and playing word games again…Siefert removed the plug of vomit and none of Jason’s semantic trolling does anything to disprove the real evidence…
Jason is lying once again and twisting words…He have shown evidence for the 5 bottles of wine because the 20 minute suctioning time is evidenced in the Hospital Report…Plus we have evidence of it being spilled and soaking Jimi…Plus we have Dr Thurston witnessing it to Meehan…And we have Dr Bannister telling of it directly…You can see Jason is trying to get around Siefert’s direct witnessing of “Jimi being covered in red wine” by babbling a large volume of BS…But he is in open publicly-displayed denial of Dr Siefert’s comment…That isn’t honest so Jason is showing the public that he can only make his claims by dishonestly ignoring the evidence…You can’t have Jimi covered in red wine from only 1 bottle so that description backs our drowning in wine proof…
We have evidence the wine was covered-up…Jason is dishonestly asking for evidence of wine that was covered-up…Dr Thurston’s knowledge not being represented in the actual autopsy report, as well as clear efforts by Scotland Yard to avoid the wine, is all the evidence we need…The nurses would have confirmed it, which is why they were not interviewed…It is not reasonable or honest to call for evidence of something you have shown proof was covered-up…Because Jason is a dark-sider he seeks sanctuary in deliberately-created darkness and criminal omission of evidence…
Jason is lying when he says the hospital said it was a drug overdose…When he writes that he knows the hospital and autopsy said it was asphyxiation on vomit…Dr Bannister described to us exactly what the consistency of that “vomit” was…Jason once again shows us his trolling method is firmly based on dishonest semantics, misquotes, and lies…
Jason is just outwardly lying about Dr Thurston…The fact he never mentioned the stomach full of red wine that he spoke of to Meehan in any official way in any autopsy report or forensic determination is proof of a cover-up and corruption of the investigation…This is further reinforced by the Inquest failing to call any medical witnesses, which is proof of avoidance of those witnesses to the wine and is therefore proof of a cover-up…Dr Siefert’s not speaking of it is proof of a cover-up, as is the 1992 re-investigation’s avoidance of it – and even their avoidance of it now…
Buster the wine troll clown continues to embarrass himself with his fake unbelievable stories that have already been debunked decades ago by credible doctors. Buster the clown triples down on his idiotic theories giving us all a good laugh for a Monday evening.
BUSTER says: Jason is a troll who found this comments section and learned about the topic for the first time from it…If we could find out who Jason is and look at his true background in this subject we would even further understand that Jason is not here for honest purposes nor is he or his person credible…I on the other hand am a well researched expert who has done extensive research and interviews…Jason calls out to a fantasy audience that doesn’t exist and tells us they are laughing at me…
JASON says: Here is another lie coming from you. I know more about Jimi Hendrix than you do. You are a “Hendrix Murder troll” that infiltrates sites and pushes your hoax. You are no “expert”. All your “information” comes from debunked sources and books that are not credible. You already claimed I was Ed somebody so you have zero credibility. Everybody who reads your comments laughs at you.
BUSTER says: Jason has contrived an idiotic argument that Jimi was dead for 6 hours so therefore Dr’s Siefert and Bannister did no treatments on Jimi…
JASON says: it’s correct.that Jimi was dead for 6 hours when he arrived at the hospital. Procedures are not performed on a 6 hour dead corpse. How many times do you need this to be told to you?
BUSTER says: Jason has been repeatedly shown that Siefert admitted he “worked on Jimi” and the Hospital Report recorded a half hour treatment time from 11:45 to 12:15…
JASON says: Buster has been repeatedly shown that no procedures were performed on Jimi Hendrix but he continues to push his bogus hoax.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: Dr. Siefert clearly states that no procedures were done on Hendrix. Procedures are not performed on dead 6 hour corpses but Buster the clown ignores it and pushes his b.s. hoax on you. Buster is a fraud.
BUSTER says: Unlike Jason, I actually met and interviewed Dr Bannister and he told me Siefert was right next to him for that recorded half hour…
JASON says: Buster the clown is a liar. Fraud Bannister never said in a real public interview that Siefert worked on Hendrix. Siefert told Kathy Etchingham in documented testimony that he never worked on Hendrix besides the basic formality. Buster is a fraudulent liar who changed his story after I wrote the first 2 parts of my Bannister series. Buster was always saying Bannister worked alone.
“We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes — he was dead.”- Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: Siefert debunks Buster’s bogus crap again.
BUSTER says: But even more importantly we have already repeatedly told Jason that Siefert and Bannister had no way to know how long Jimi was dead when he showed up on their emergency room table, so they did their duty and tried to save him because under the circumstances, at the moment, they had no way to know if Jimi’s heart had stopped seconds before they hooked him up to the monitor…Jason has dismissed himself from credibility and the fact he thinks he is getting away with his idiotic 6 hour dead canard instead of answering this shows how uncredible he is…He’s just going to repeat his 6 hour dead claim no matter what he sees and in doing that he disqualifies himself from credible debate…
JASON says: Buster shows off his ignorance once again by making another asinine claim. It has already been told to Buster that doctors can estimate how long a person has been dead for. Bannister is telling this idiot that Hendrix was already dead for hours. But he ignores it over and over to push his bogus debunked hoax. We all know Buster is a fraud with zero credibility.
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior to coming to hospital….I personally think he probably died a long time before. He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of somebody who had been dead for some time. We worked on him for about half an hour without any response at all.”- ex Doctor Bannister
JASON says: Bannister is telling this fraud Buster that Hendrix was dead for hours in his statement. No doctors would work on a person in this condition. Bannister is also a liar for claiming he worked in a man in this condition.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying when he says “No documentation exists for any treatment of Jimi”…The Hospital Report lists “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15” and therefore confirms Bannister’s claimed half hour as well as confirming Siefert’s not telling the truth…The nurses Scotland Yard criminally avoided would have verified Bannister (which is why Scotland Yard avoided them)…
JASON says: The nurses and all the doctors knew nothing was done for Hendrix as Siefert and Brown testified to. No treatments are performed on 6 hour dead bodies. The news reported from 1970 stated that Hendrix was dead on arrival and was shipped off to the morgue for an autopsy. Nothing was ever reported about treatments. No wine removal is ever documented for Jimi Hendrix anywhere. Buster loses his phony hoax.
BUSTER says: Jason once again focuses on dishonest semantics and ripping things out of context…In now way did Siefert or Brown mean that no attempt to resuscitate was done on Jimi when they said no revival was possible…Both those comments were from decades later and both were based on hindsight…Jason dishonestly tries to portray those comments to mean Siefert and Brown immediately determined that day that no revival was possible…Jason is lying when he ignores that the true context of those statements was in the sense that after taking 20 minutes to suction the wine and clear the airways, plus another 10 minutes for a failed attempt to ventilate, that in hindsight, years later, it was determined that no revival was possible…Jason is lying when he dishonestly tries to switch context to that morning…And he is lying when he contends those dishonestly-misconstrued statements indicate that Jimi was never worked on…
JASON says: More bogus garbage from Buster. Nothing like this is ever documented for Jimi Hendrix. Brown and Siefert said nothing was done and they are officially documented as saying so. Buster the clown loses his phony hoax.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying and the true context was Dr Bannister was emphasizing that the accusations by Monika Dannemann, that he was responsible for Jimi’s death by failing to do a tracheostomy, was provably wrong because Jimi had obviously been dead for hours…What Jason is avoiding admitting is Bannister was correct about Jimi being dead for hours, just like he was correct about suctioning 5 bottles of wine from his lungs and stomach, just like he was correct about the half hour treatment time, and just like he was correct about wine soaking Jimi that was also confirmed by Dr Siefert…Jason enthusiastically seeks one of the lowest roles you can take in human existence as a government murder defender against a person who was horrifically murdered by the system…Jason is an evil-loving servant of Satan and dirty rat…
JASON says: Buster has a Satan fetish. He truly needs mental help. More b.s. from Buster. No wine was ever suctioned since there was no wine. Buster the clown has no evidence of this and he never will since it never happened. All he can post is b.s, stories that don’t exist and claim it happened. No proof and it has been debunked by both Brown and Siefert who both say it never happened. Buster wants to play word games cuz he is desperate to push his phony hoax. Buster is an exposed fraud.
BUSTER says: Jason violates common basic medical procedure…Lungs full of fluid takes precedent over darkened cyanosed cheek lining tissue…Jason ignores that persons have been brought back to life with similar symptoms so his painfully transparent attempt to con us around the correct evidence once again fails badly while he ignores the easily-explained evidence…The doctors were trying to establish an airway as a first priority and none of Jason’s idiotic, childish trolling changes that…
JASON says: Now Buster the clown believes 6 hour dead bodies can be brought back to life. Everybody is laughing their heads off. The brain is dead and body has permanently shut down. Buster is a clown who deserves only ridicule and mockery for posting such ludicrous nonsense. Buster is the most desperate fool.around for posting this.
BUSTER says: Jason is publicly stupid because it was Kathy in 1992 who got Crompton to confirm Jimi died at 5:30am…The knowledge that Jimi was dead for 6 hours did not come until 1992 when Crompton said that…So Jason is mocking himself…All Siefert & Bannister knew at 11:45am on 9-18 is they had a patient for whom priority first aid required establishing an airway…No matter how many times Jason stupidly tries to troll the false context of Siefert & Bannister knowing Jimi was dead for 6 hours at 11:45am 9-18, this truth doesn’t change and Siefert and Bannister clearly did the right thing and did what they were trained to do…
JASON says: Buster is an idiot who uses post 1992 claims to push his hoax. The doctors were there in 1970 to witness a 6 hour dead Hendrix. They told Kathy what they witnessed in 1970. Kathy and Crompton are irrelevant since they were not there to witness anything in 1970. 6 hour dead bodies do not get worked on. Brown and Siefert already made this clear. Buster the troll hoaxer still repeats his same stupid crap over and over.
BUSTER says: Jason tries to get away with a moronically primitive hand-wave about “those books”, but closer examination will see those books were written by the best experts on the subject who, unlike Jason who restricts his involvement to trolling Velvet Rocket, actually did extensive research and accessed important documents…The persons who wrote those books accessed the Hospital Report and got the 11:45 to 12:15 treatment time from it…That half hour treatment time was verified by Dr Bannister…If we could produce that Hospital Report it will say “Treatment Time – 11:45am to 12:15pm”…
JASON says: Dr. Siefert and Dr. Brown both refute this phony “treatment” that never happened. The medical report says nothing since it never happened. So, the “so called expert” Buster is making up phony claims based on a non existent report. That’s why he is a fraud.
BUSTER says:Jason stupidly ignores that his source for the official story, Monika Dannemann, said there was a long treatment time at St Mary Abotts for Jimi…The Hospital Report would not say 11:45 to 12:15 if Stickells identified the body at noon (duh)…All that is is Jason throwing more garbage in for purposes of obfuscation and confusion…
JASON says: Monka is not credible and reports said Stickells identified Jmi’s body at noon which again debunks your phony hoax of fake “treatments”.
BUSTER says: Jason is stupidly in denial of the reality that we could take wine-soaked vomit and throw it on the same exact bedding and it would mostly dry up after 6 hours after the wine had soaked in to the bedding materials…This is a fact Jason’s stupid scoffing doesn’t escape or credibly answer to…Jason is in stupid denial that if Siefert said Jimi was covered in red wine then that means he had to be covered in red wine at the Samarkand…It can’t be any other way…Jason dismisses himself from being taken seriously by trying to ignore this and answering it with scoffing…
JASON says: Buster the clown has lied for years that “pure wine “was soaked all over the bed and not one person witnessed it. So, now he changes his story to “vomit being wine”. If Hendrix was drowned in wine there would be an opposite reaction but Buster the clown is too stupid to realize that. This wine troll changes his story again but is totally debunked.
BUSTER says: Jason is trolling for effect when he says “Bannister said there was no plug of vomit”…He knows Banister never said that but he’s throwing it in there anyway in order to increase the effect of his idiotic trolling…Since I spoke to Bannister in person, and Jason is just an annoying Velvet Rocket troll, what Bannister said (and Jason has already had this explained to him) is Siefert got there first…The reason Bannister never mentions the plug of vomit is because Siefert removed it before he got there and all he saw was wine in the throat…Jason continues to offer the obnoxious material of a 12 year old…Jason is lying and playing word games again…Siefert removed the plug of vomit and none of Jason’s semantic trolling does anything to disprove the real evidence…
JASON says: Bannister never said there was a “hard plug of vomit” in any of his real interviews since no “plug” never existed. You made it up for your phony hoax so you can still claim wine. You are a hoaxing troll. Another so called claim of speaking to Bannister is not evidence since all his public statements refute your phony “private conversations” you claim.
You are a troll and a pathetic liar. You clearly stated that Bannister “removed the fake plug of vomit”. We have you on record stating this many times. Now you are changing your phony story to Siefert, you wine troll.
Dr. Siefert is already documented confirming he did no work on Hendrix besides the basic formality. You are a fraud.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying once again and twisting words…He have shown evidence for the 5 bottles of wine because the 20 minute suctioning time is evidenced in the Hospital Report…Plus we have evidence of it being spilled and soaking Jimi…Plus we have Dr Thurston witnessing it to Meehan…And we have Dr Bannister telling of it directly…You can see Jason is trying to get around Siefert’s direct witnessing of “Jimi being covered in red wine” by babbling a large volume of BS…But he is in open publicly-displayed denial of Dr Siefert’s comment…That isn’t honest so Jason is showing the public that he can only make his claims by dishonestly ignoring the evidence…You can’t have Jimi covered in red wine from only 1 bottle so that description backs our drowning in wine proof…
JASON says: No evidence of 5 bottles ever exists and nobody at the flat ever witnessed any wine soaking Jimi or the bed. This wine hoax is finished for good.
BUSTER says: We have evidence the wine was covered-up…Jason is dishonestly asking for evidence of wine that was covered-up…Dr Thurston’s knowledge not being represented in the actual autopsy report, as well as clear efforts by Scotland Yard to avoid the wine, is all the evidence we need…The nurses would have confirmed it, which is why they were not interviewed…It is not reasonable or honest to call for evidence of something you have shown proof was covered-up…Because Jason is a dark-sider he seeks sanctuary in deliberately-created darkness and criminal omission of evidence…
JASON says: More conspiracy garbage since you are debunked. Thurston said nothing about wine and confirmed it to be an overdose. You have no evidence. Deal with it.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying when he says the hospital said it was a drug overdose…When he writes that he knows the hospital and autopsy said it was asphyxiation on vomit…Dr Bannister described to us exactly what the consistency of that “vomit” was…Jason once again shows us his trolling method is firmly based on dishonest semantics, misquotes, and lies…
JASON says: Buster is a lying fraud. St. Mary Abbots hospital clearly stated to the media on 9/18/70 that Jimi Hendrix died from an overdose and it was reported worldwide. Nothing about wine. Too bad wine troll.
BUSTER says: Jason is just outwardly lying about Dr Thurston…The fact he never mentioned the stomach full of red wine that he spoke of to Meehan in any official way in any autopsy report or forensic determination is proof of a cover-up and corruption of the investigation…This is further reinforced by the Inquest failing to call any medical witnesses, which is proof of avoidance of those witnesses to the wine and is therefore proof of a cover-up…Dr Siefert’s not speaking of it is proof of a cover-up, as is the 1992 re-investigation’s avoidance of it – and even their avoidance of it now…
JASON says: More b.s. conspiracy with zero proof since there never was any wine in Hendrix. Thurston is never on the record writing or speaking about wine. Wine never existed. Buster is a clownish joker who claims “cover up” when all the real evidence refutes him. He has no credibility and deserves mockery and ridicule for his garbage he posts.
Sharon Lawrence made up the fake Thurston story in her fiction book. Hundreds of reporters were asking Thurston hat happened to Jimi in 1970. Thurston told all the reporters it was an overdose. He isn’t going to tell Meehan something completely different. Give me a freaking break.
This hoax is a joke based on phony claims with zero proof and Buster looks like more if a clown each time he tries to explain away a debunked crock of shit. it’s hilarious.
Hi Jason. Loved your post. I went to see the movie Judy a film about Judy Garland and when I came home I did some reading about her; it seems she died in the same way Jimi did taking barbiturates with alcohol her husband found her dead on the bathroom floor. Interestingly Dr. Thurston was the one who performed the autopsy so he was no novice in these types of deaths. He performed a thorough autopsy of Judy Garland as he would have on Jimi being the experienced expert and professional that he was. He was not someone who could be coerced into changing the findings of an autopsy report since he performed a number of autopsies on prominent people. He was a trusted and highly regarded pathologist.
Thurston worked on many famous people and was a highly respected coroner. I wrote about this in my “Debunking the phony imbibed wine theory” series.
Thurston got it right and found no wine since it would be obvious during forensic analysis. Wine was never in play in 1970 anyway.
Wine trolls like Bluster and Flysquatter can only claim a “cover up” since all the real evidence forever refutes them.
LOL.. gotta love seeing stupid Sister Ivana Sow oinking out her dumb shit about “Dr. Thurston performing the autopsy” .
Got news for stupid Sister Ivana Sow……………it was Dr. Teare, not Dr. Thurston, that conducted the autopsy.
And nothing that stupid Sister Ivana Sow posted answers the question of “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make an estimate of 100mg blood alcohol ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion”, if there was ‘no wine’, as Sister Ivana Sow and her piglet twin brother keep trying to decree?
This was part of the routine autopsy report you need to examine every aspect of the body for accurate analysis. You have continuously stated that Jimi was water boarded to death with copious amounts of wine five bottles in fact as mentioned by your other half. The 100mgs was probably consumed by Jimi at his various parties attended; as said over and over again this did not cause his death. You are now focusing on the ingestion of wine rather than the waterboarding of wine. Talk about trying to cover your tracks with your stupid simplistic nit picking. How about focusing on the fact that Jimi’s death was caused by the inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication instead of the false scenario of death by red wine. Stop posting false make believe scenarios and trying to make yourselves look like real experts instead of the fairytale writers you actually are. This is just like your ridiculous suggestion of transporting a dead body to the hospital in a car when it is well known that you call the ambulance. I love watching you make a complete fool of yourself every time you post something with your naivety. It is so important to you to point out my error about Dr Thurston and Dr.Teare but you fail to mention that they both came to the same conclusion about Jimi’s death and it had nothing to do with wine. You are now making the ridiculous claim that the gurgling noises coming from Jimi is testimony of the wine. What utter BS when this is part of the dying process. Do everyone a favour and stop posting your dumb stupid rants. You are just making yourself look like an idiot as no one is buying into what you say. At least not the intelligent ones.
LOL at stupid Sister Ivana Sow oinking out her dumb shit about “You are just making yourself look like an idiot as no one is buying into what you say. At least not the intelligent ones.”
The more intelligent readers can easily see that I’m making Sister Ivana Sow look stupid and that Sister Ivana Sow is also making herself look stupid. Double-barrel effect.
And still no answer to “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make an estimate of 100mg blood alcohol ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion”, if there was ‘no wine’, as Sister Ivana Sow and her piglet twin brother keep trying to decree?
You need a dose of reality Flysquatter. Everyone is laughing at you. You don’t need to do anything in particular just keep posting your idiotic comments like you did on other threads. Look what happened to both of you there. THROWN OFF by intelligent and skeptical readers. Try and understand what I’m writing you misunderstood about the wine just like you did about the hotel.
From peteyvee on the gear page:
I have a new theory: new members Flyswatter and Scrum Drum are either the same person (which is against TGP rules, by the way) or both are acquainted via some Hendrix “truther” website, found this thread by a google search and revived it… I could probably prove it, but I’m busy watching the Colts and Patsies
JASON says: This poster is from a site Scrum Drum aka Buster and Flyswatter posted on. The poster says they are the same person. Both made fools of themselves on there like they do here. Two wine trolls pushing a hoax.or one mentally ill person pushing his hoax.
I don’t remember posting at “The Gear Page”…In any case, take away Peteyvee’s moderator power and what do you have?…I’m not sensing much of an intellect there…I’m thinking Petey really couldn’t muster much in the way of intelligent input and his moderation might be a tool by which he shields his obvious stupidity…
BUSTER says: I don’t remember posting at “The Gear Page”…In any case, take away Peteyvee’s moderator power and what do you have?…I’m not sensing much of an intellect there…I’m thinking Petey really couldn’t muster much in the way of intelligent input and his moderation might be a tool by which he shields his obvious stupidity…
JASON says: That’s cuz you troll so many sites you forget where you post. You troll any site pushing your “Hendrix Murder hoax” and are laughed at everywhere.
Hi Jason. I was hoping you would go to this site and check it out. It’s funny they both follow each other like they do here with the same obnoxious trolling. On one site Scrum Drum postered first then Buster followed right behind. It might be a game he’s playing trying to monopolise and infiltrate sites with his bogus story and then trolling anyone who doesn’t agree with him. At any rate no one believed him and he’s got a dubious reputation on these sites at least they had the good sense to throw him off.
Hi Ivana,
Thanks for informing me about that site. I found that post on page 7 as I was reading the site. It could very well be that “Flyswatter” and Buster” is the same person. Both names post the same nonsense in a similar style.
Nobody agreed with Buster aka Scrum Drum or “Flyswatter” on that gear site and the posters were either laughing at him or refuting him. Same nonsense as he posts here.
Buster was on a site called “drummer world” doing the same thing posting as as “Scrum Drum” until the administrator of the site got tired of his abusive posts and locked the thread.
One poster on that site says he trolls google everyday looking for sites to post his bogus “Hendrix murder myth”. Then he tries to aggressively debate people like he is an “authority”. He is just a foolish clown.
Another guy said he makes up several alias accounts to troll people and to agree with himself since nobody else will. He needs help.
Buster is a troll who has too much time on his hands trying to look “important” on the internet. Nobody takes this clown seriously. He has changed all his phony claims from before and that’s how we all know this is a hoax.
Here is another one Ivana.
From Gruntersdad Administrator of drummer world:
“I can’t believe someone would join a drumming forum just for the sole purpose of debating Jimi Hendrix death. Regardless of cause. Sounds like he really needs to find someone to support his fanatical view or ideas.
I hope everyone has had their say because I feel this has gone long enough. Let’s get back to drumming. Thank you.”
JASON says: This is what the owner of the drummer world site posted about Buster’s trolling and aggressive debating. He was posting the same nonsense like he does on here. Posters were disagreeing or mocking him which made him angry. The owner called him a conspiracy theorist.
Google “Scrum Drum Hendrix”
“Buster” infiltrates all these sites trolling with his “Hendrix murder” garbage. He’s been doing this for a decade, since his posts go back that far, and he still can never prove his phony hoax since it’s a total sham
Buster is a total clown wine hoaxing troll.
Hi Jason. This is absolutely priceless. I believe everything that is said about Buster by these other posters as we both know his style very well. Imagine spending a decade debating/trolling about a murder that never took place and then trying to convince others it did. Talk about a life wasted. He loves to talk about the video The Last 24 Hours which I found really boring. None of the people closely associated with Jimi appear on it or offer anything new. A group of actors play the parts and you can’t trust any of the documentation as being authentic. These two keep repeating their scenarios over and over again in order to make it sound believable and convincing. Unable to resuscitate simply means that any attempt to save Jimi’s life was futile as he had been dead for ages what it doesn’t mean is that the doctors performed any procedures on Jimi like extracting the bogus five bottles of wine from a long dead corpse. These two just sound ridiculous, stupid and crackpots if there are two of them. Like you said Jason he is someone who is trying to be a somebody in this saga but he is just a legend in his own lunchbox.
All Buster aka Scrum Drum has is after the fact claims and phony re-creations in reenactment. He has zero evidence to prove any of his phony claims. They all have been debunked. Imagine spending a decade of your life arguing on the internet and repeating the same nonsense that is totally false. Then after it’s debunked he makes up new fake claims trying to prove a phony theory. All his years and hours were wasted on a bogus theory. All the other posters either disagree or laugh at him. Hilarious. The “legend in his own lunchbox ” was funny.
All Flysquatter aka Buster can do is repeat the same nonsense over and over which repeatedly debunks his bogus claims.
Anyone can see most casual uninformed internet posters have no clue about the facts behind Jimi’s death and post ignorant thoughts based on lies we’ve refuted…Most internet sites are moderator dictatorships so when you start showing the favored members of any website that they don’t know what they are talking about that power-abusing mod steps in bails out his regulars…It’s nothing new…Because a dumb-ass who happens to be a moderator bans the subject doesn’t mean he’s automatically credible or the dummies are automatically right…Most intelligent people are smart enough to see the difference in the quality of comments and most likely smart posters who show how stupid the regulars are are the ones who get the boot…The only reason Jason gets away with what he does here is because there is no screening of trolls…
BUSTER says Anyone can see most casual uninformed internet posters have no clue about the facts behind Jimi’s death and post ignorant thoughts based on lies we’ve refuted…Most internet sites are moderator dictatorships so when you start showing the favored members of any website that they don’t know what they are talking about that power-abusing mod steps in bails out his regulars…It’s nothing new…Because a dumb-ass who happens to be a moderator bans the subject doesn’t mean he’s automatically credible or the dummies are automatically right…Most intelligent people are smart enough to see the difference in the quality of comments and most likely smart posters who show how stupid the regulars are are the ones who get the boot…The only reason Jason gets away with what he does here is because there is no screening of trolls…
JASON says: The only troll is you who was banned from every Hendrix site or page posting your garbage. You’ve been posting for over a decade and are at the same point when you started…..nothing….and you never will have anything cuz it’s all a hoax.
“Sister Ivana Sow says:
November 6, 2019 at 4:46 pm
You need a dose of reality Flysquatter. Everyone is laughing at ME (Sister Ivana Sow).”
^^FIXED !!
There is the reality that Sister Ivana Sow speaks of.
And still no answer to “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make an estimate of 100mg blood alcohol ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion”, if there was ‘no wine’, as Sister Ivana Sow and her piglet twin brother keep trying to decree?
And still no answer to “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink” if there was no wine, as Jason keeps self-decreeing?
No, it wasn’t the autopsy report, as it’s already been proven that there is no way possible that Dr. Brown could have been citing the autopsy when Brown made reference to Jimi having “a bit too much to drink”, as the autopsy states Jimi’s blood alcohol content was .005% and that what Dr. Teare was talking about regarding 100mg was only an estimation at the time of Vesperax ingestion. Dr. Brown has never made reference to the autopsy data at any time, anywhere. Dr. Brown was citing what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots — there is no other possibility.
Jason continues to show his ignorance by repeatedly claiming “no wine” and then trying to refer to the 100mg estimate by Dr. Teare to try to support his lie about Dr. Brown citing the autopsy report.
And still no answer to……….
*** We’ve seen Jason repeatedly blather that “the ambulance attendants didn’t see any wine”.
But when you click this link and go to the bottom of the page, read what Michael Fairchild says:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell2.html
Notice at the bottom of the page Fairchild says in blue text:
“Doctors and attendants who handled Jimi’s body recall him being covered with a large amount of red wine”.
It raises the obvious question:
Why would Fairchild — who was there in the early 1990’s speaking directly to these people — publish that statement, if there was no wine witnessed by these men, as Jason keeps self-decreeing?
Of course, the correct answer is that they all saw the wine & Jason is a blatant liar with his self- decree of “no wine” & Jason just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
Also on that page, when we look at Dr. Seifert’s statement, he also says:
“After we worked on Jimi – we didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix until later on – I remember just a vague memory of a bit of fuss going on in admissions, but it could have been anything, it was a casualty ward.”
Notice the words “After we worked on Jimi”? And yet we have Jason claiming that Seifert is saying that “no treatment was done” & Jason obviously omitting that part of Seifert’s statement, because Seifert is telling us that they did work on Jimi. And the hospital report that has “Time of Treatment: 11:45AM to 12:15PM”, written on it that was most likely written by the Medical Registrar — none other than Dr. Seifert.
If there were “no treatment done”, as Jason keeps trying to delude himself with this self-decreed fabrication pulled out of his ass, then Seifert never uses those words “After we worked on Jimi”. Seifert clearly states that they did work on Jimi.
Jason can’t claim that Fairchild is making this up to sell a book, because that site has been up on web and free for anyone to read for well over a decade.***
And again, because Jason can’t answer or refute it………
The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” and no matter how much Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, it does not change or alter that fact that a resuscitation attempt was made and treatment was done for 30 minutes from 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Those are the documented facts that Jason’s lying misquotes can’t get around.
This 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book ‘Inside the Experience”, published in 1990, and that info was most likely gotten from the hospital report. Mitch doesn’t get anything wrong, as Jason tries to self-decree, because Jason can’t refute the 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame that is referenced in Mitch’s book.
Anybody can go to You Tube and watch the video “The Last 24 Hours” and if they watch closely, they will see the coroner’s form and see where it says “Unable to Resuscitate”.
None of Jason’s blather about “the hospital wouldn’t do this or that” can get around those documented facts.
Interesting how these two inept clods (Jason and Ivana) talk about Judy Garland, but never mention that Dr. Thurston stated on her death certificate “Barbiturate Poisoning” which is not the same as the “Barbiturate Intoxication” stated on Jimi’s death certificate.
Obviously, Judy had a LOT more barbiturate content in her system than Jimi did, and one can also notice no mention of vomiting by Judy. One can see for themselves here:
Judy had a barbiturate problem for a while as shown in the film. However the barbiturates caused the death of both Judy and Jimi you cannot get around this fact. The barbiturate levels caused Jimi to vomit and choke to death and not the presence of any other factor. You can see for yourself just how toxic these pills were on their own. Dr Thurston did a great job on both these two artists.
“Sister Ivana Sow says:
November 6, 2019 at 7:06 pm
….the barbiturates caused the death of both Judy and Jimi you cannot get around this fact.”
Try again, stupid lying oinker. It’s already been gotten around that barbiturates didn’t cause Jimi’s death just by the autopsy report alone. Jimi’s autopsy doesn’t state that barbiturates caused his death.
Jimi’s barbiturate level was nowhere close to that of Judy Garland’s and certainly nowhere close to that of Marilyn Monroe’s which can be seen at the bottom of her autopsy report here:
http://www.autopsyfiles.org/reports/Celebs/monroe,%20marilyn_report.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2zeA6zCuzDzqm-9W93CZ2cB8Ghcq9kjMyj8RlSWSSrkLqZlRSiJqhK7MU
And we have pictorial proof that Marilyn Monroe didn’t throw up that can be seen here:
http://www.autopsyfiles.org/monroe_death_pics.htm?fbclid=IwAR1f31Bkd_OvD-CLJgoD1il4fsbMeZ_NwqMaB7m_eNIDNq8kdszN_cafYmM
The statement by Sister Ivana Sow of “The barbiturate levels caused Jimi to vomit and choke to death and not the presence of any other factor” is just a self-decreed fabrication that she is pulling out of her ass.
If anything, these two cases (Garland and Monroe, and there is probably many more even still) prove that the so-called “inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication” to be a complete hoax. Both Garland and Monroe were ingested with a LOT more barbiturate content than Jimi was, and yet, no throwing up by either of these two gals.
Sister Ivana Sow has yet to show us a case where a victim of barbiturate overdose threw up excessively (probably because there isn’t any to be found) like Jimi did.
Dr. Bannister, Dr. Seifert, Dr. Brown, Dr. Teare, and Dr. Thurston all made references to wine. Monika told both Sharon Lawrence and Tony Brown that there was wine at the Samarkand flat on the day Jimi died.
And again…..still no answer to “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make an estimate of 100mg blood alcohol ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion”, if there was ‘no wine’, as Sister Ivana Sow and her piglet twin brother keep trying to decree?
My barbiturate forensic arguments are quite credible…They prove Jimi only had 1800mg of barbiturate in his blood when he died and a person with no tolerance required 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…Jimi had a notorious tolerance for drugs, including Secobarbitol…So that means he was nowhere close to overdosing as these two lying trolls claim…Jimi needed at least 3000mg or more to reach Lethal Dose with his infamous tolerance so he wasn’t anywhere close to overdosing with the 1800mg recorded in his blood at autopsy…This means Jimi did not die from the barbiturates…It means he died from being drowned in wine…Also, 9 Vesparax tablets could not possibly cause the profuse vomiting seen at Jimi’s death scene only 1 or 2 hours after taking the pills…Which also means that vomiting was caused by drowning in wine…
Good find Flyswatter…The word “poisoning” is important because it is used intentionally to differentiate between a registered Lethal Dose and doses that were below it…Now that we have proof of the London Coroner’s Office nomenclature, the fact that they didn’t enter “poisoning” for Jimi’s cause of death proves he did not overdose…Well done…
BUSTER says: My barbiturate forensic arguments are quite credible…They prove Jimi only had 1800mg of barbiturate in his blood when he died and a person with no tolerance required 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…Jimi had a notorious tolerance for drugs, including Secobarbitol…So that means he was nowhere close to overdosing as these two lying trolls claim…Jimi needed at least 3000mg or more to reach Lethal Dose with his infamous tolerance so he wasn’t anywhere close to overdosing with the 1800mg recorded in his blood at autopsy…This means Jimi did not die from the barbiturates…It means he died from being drowned in wine…Also, 9 Vesparax tablets could not possibly cause the profuse vomiting seen at Jimi’s death scene only 1 or 2 hours after taking the pills…Which also means that vomiting was caused by drowning in wine…
Good find Flyswatter…The word “poisoning” is important because it is used intentionally to differentiate between a registered Lethal Dose and doses that were below it…Now that we have proof of the London Coroner’s Office nomenclature, the fact that they didn’t enter “poisoning” for Jimi’s cause of death proves he did not overdose…Well done…
JASON says: Buster the wine troll has no wine to claim since none exists anywhere. No medical record or autopsy states wine. Wine trolls can’t claim what doesn’t exist.
Flyswatter: Do you think that Jason’s retarded inability to muster any intelligent response to my clearly spelled-out barbiturate forensics in his response shows that maybe all Jason has is idiotic trash-talk and maybe intelligent discussion of evidence is over his head?…Jason: If you are trying to make yourself look like a crude troll who can’t answer the best most intelligent evidence, who exposes himself by embarrassing himself with answers that would come from a 12 year old, then your last post is doing a good job…You might want to check that out because you might not realize you just made yourself look like a fool by being unable to credibly answer forensic proof that the pills didn’t kill Jimi… Just a clue Jason – name-calling is not an adequate answer to firm numbers and medical science that you obviously can’t answer…
By the way Jason – nice moronic avoidance of the “poisoning” nomenclature…
“BUSTER says:
November 6, 2019 at 9:57 pm
Flyswatter: Do you think that Jason’s retarded inability to muster any intelligent response to my clearly spelled-out barbiturate forensics in his response shows that maybe all Jason has is idiotic trash-talk and maybe intelligent discussion of evidence is over his head?”
Of course — Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, as evidenced by his statement of “Buster the wine troll has no wine to claim since none exists anywhere. No medical record or autopsy states wine. Wine trolls can’t claim what doesn’t exist.”
As you can see, Buster, all Jason is telling anyone is that he can’t answer “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make a100mg blood alcohol ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion”, if there was ‘no wine’, as Sister Ivana Sow and her piglet twin brother keep trying to decree?”
Same bogus repeated claims over and over again from this troll.
FLYSWATTER says:: Interesting how these two inept clods (Jason and Ivana) talk about Judy Garland, but never mention that Dr. Thurston stated on her death certificate “Barbiturate Poisoning” which is not the same as the “Barbiturate Intoxication” stated on Jimi’s death certificate.
JASON says: I never spoke of Judy Garland, moron. Both death certificates states barbiturates. Nothing for Hendrix says anything about wine. nothing about wine anywhere
All the crap you posted over and over has already been debunked.
Brown cited Teare’s report and no wine was ever detected.
Any attempt to hook someone up to a monitor for resuscitation is listed as “unable to resuscitate”.
No medical record for any “treatments” ever existed on Jimi’s medical file.
Siefert and Brown testified no “procedures” were ever performed.
No wine was ever documented in 1970 anywhere by anybody.
This troll continue to embarrass himself.
This is hilarious.
Still no documented evidence or proof ever exists.
Your hoax has been flushed down the toilet.
TRANSLATED:
Jason still has no answer to “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make an estimate of 100mg blood alcohol ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion”, if there was ‘no wine’, as Sister Ivana Sow and her piglet twin brother keep trying to decree?
And Jason still has no answer to “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink” if there was no wine, as Jason keeps self-decreeing?
No, it wasn’t the autopsy report, as it’s already been proven that there is no way possible that Dr. Brown could have been citing the autopsy when Brown made reference to Jimi having “a bit too much to drink”, as the autopsy states Jimi’s blood alcohol content was .005% and that what Dr. Teare was talking about regarding 100mg was only an estimation at the time of Vesperax ingestion. Dr. Brown has never made reference to the autopsy data at any time, anywhere. Dr. Brown was citing what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots — there is no other possibility.
Jason continues to show his ignorance by repeatedly claiming “no wine” and then trying to refer to the 100mg estimate by Dr. Teare to try to support his lie about Dr. Brown citing the autopsy report.
And still no answer to……….
*** We’ve seen Jason repeatedly blather that “the ambulance attendants didn’t see any wine”.
But when you click this link and go to the bottom of the page, read what Michael Fairchild says:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell2.html
Notice at the bottom of the page Fairchild says in blue text:
“Doctors and attendants who handled Jimi’s body recall him being covered with a large amount of red wine”.
It raises the obvious question:
Why would Fairchild — who was there in the early 1990’s speaking directly to these people — publish that statement, if there was no wine witnessed by these men, as Jason keeps self-decreeing?
Of course, the correct answer is that they all saw the wine & Jason is a blatant liar with his self- decree of “no wine” & Jason just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
Also on that page, when we look at Dr. Seifert’s statement, he also says:
“After we worked on Jimi – we didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix until later on – I remember just a vague memory of a bit of fuss going on in admissions, but it could have been anything, it was a casualty ward.”
Notice the words “After we worked on Jimi”? And yet we have Jason claiming that Seifert is saying that “no treatment was done” & Jason obviously omitting that part of Seifert’s statement, because Seifert is telling us that they did work on Jimi. And the hospital report that has “Time of Treatment: 11:45AM to 12:15PM”, written on it that was most likely written by the Medical Registrar — none other than Dr. Seifert.
If there were “no treatment done”, as Jason keeps trying to delude himself with this self-decreed fabrication pulled out of his ass, then Seifert never uses those words “After we worked on Jimi”. Seifert clearly states that they did work on Jimi.
Jason can’t claim that Fairchild is making this up to sell a book, because that site has been up on web and free for anyone to read for well over a decade.***
And again, because Jason can’t answer or refute it………
The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” and no matter how much Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, it does not change or alter that fact that a resuscitation attempt was made and treatment was done for 30 minutes from 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Those are the documented facts that Jason’s lying misquotes can’t get around.
This 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book ‘Inside the Experience”, published in 1990, and that info was most likely gotten from the hospital report. Mitch doesn’t get anything wrong, as Jason tries to self-decree, because Jason can’t refute the 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame that is referenced in Mitch’s book.
Anybody can go to You Tube and watch the video “The Last 24 Hours” and if they watch closely, they will see the coroner’s form and see where it says “Unable to Resuscitate”.
None of Jason’s blather about “the hospital wouldn’t do this or that” can get around those documented facts.
“JASON says:
November 6, 2019 at 4:18 pm
Thurston worked on many famous people and was a highly respected coroner. I wrote about this in my “Debunking the phony imbibed wine theory” series.
JASON says:
November 6, 2019 at 8:26 pm
I never spoke of Judy Garland, moron. Both death certificates states barbiturates. Nothing for Hendrix says anything about wine. nothing about wine anywhere”
You just did, DUMBASS. And were making reference to Sister Ivana Sow’s statement regarding Judy Garland. Nice job taking the bait.
“JASON says:
November 6, 2019 at 8:26 pm
Same bogus repeated claims over and over again from this troll.”
Great self-description of Jason, there.
Keep wallowing away, Jason
I just can’t believe what I’ve read from the idiot Flysquatter. Do you really think any intelligent person would choose your analysis over that of the experienced and respected specialists who had every piece of equipment necessary at their disposal to perform a proper autopsy. The highly regarded Dr. Thurston who ruled what he did after reading the report of the highly trained Dr. Teare. How foolish to think that people would fall for what you say over these professionals. What exactly are your credentials. Jason and I have done a great job in debunking your phony myths over and over again but you just cannot accept the truth for whatever reason and let go. You are embarrassing yourself time and time again. Jimi did throw up because vomit was witnessed by the ambulance officers that morning so the barbiturate level did cause inhalation of vomit due to the toxic levels of Vesparax. Dr Crompton said to Kathy that Jimi’s liver was so congested that he could not have survived. This was not caused by the alcohol but by the toxicity of the Vesparax. How many times do I need to state that the blood test is routinely performed during an autopsy and the alcohol level was ascertained then it was not mentioned because Jimi was soaked in red wine or waterboarded to death as you are suggesting. What you believe is that there was an enormous cover-up of the whole investigation and this is feeding and fueling your suspicions. Your beliefs at not based on fact but on speculation. Remember that Jimi drank an amount of wine at the two parties he attended and possibly drank wine while taking the Vesparax but this did not directly contribute his death as you are suggesting. You are down playing, I think purposely, the toxic dosage of the Vesparax that Jimi took and heightening the effects of the alcohol in order to show that this caused his death and not the Vesparax. Nice try but it’s not working on Jason and myself.
Ivana says:I just can’t believe what I’ve read from the idiot Flysquatter. Do you really think any intelligent person would choose your analysis over that of the experienced and respected specialists who had every piece of equipment necessary at their disposal to perform a proper autopsy.
JASON says: Flysquatter is a wine troll who thinks the fiction books he reads is more credible than Teare or Thurston. It’s a total joke. All “his books” are after the fact claims.
Ivana says: The highly regarded Dr. Thurston who ruled what he did after reading the report of the highly trained Dr. Teare. How foolish to think that people would fall for what you say over these professionals. What exactly are your credentials.
JASON says: Flysquatter’s credentials are pushing a fake hoax and suppressing the real evidence for his phony claims.
ivana says: Jason and I have done a great job in debunking your phony myths over and over again but you just cannot accept the truth for whatever reason and let go. You are embarrassing yourself time and time again.
JASON says: After their phony myths are debunked they make up new ones that are even worse.
IVANA says: Jimi did throw up because vomit was witnessed by the ambulance officers that morning so the barbiturate level did cause inhalation of vomit due to the toxic levels of Vesparax. Dr Crompton said to Kathy that Jimi’s liver was so congested that he could not have survived. This was not caused by the alcohol but by the toxicity of the Vesparax. How many times do I need to state that the blood test is routinely performed during an autopsy and the alcohol level was ascertained then it was not mentioned because Jimi was soaked in red wine or waterboarded to death as you are suggesting. What you believe is that there was an enormous cover-up of the whole investigation and this is feeding and fueling your suspicions. Your beliefs at not based on fact but on speculation. Remember that Jimi drank an amount of wine at the two parties he attended and possibly drank wine while taking the Vesparax but this did not directly contribute his death as you are suggesting. You are down playing, I think purposely, the toxic dosage of the Vesparax that Jimi took and heightening the effects of the alcohol in order to show that this caused his death and not the Vesparax. Nice try but it’s not working on Jason and myself.
JASON says: They still have no evidence of wine at the flat or in any medical or autopsy report. All they can do is provide speculation and more phony conspiracies that easily get debunked.
From peteyvee on the gear page:
I have a new theory: new members Flyswatter and Scrum Drum are either the same person (which is against TGP rules, by the way) or both are acquainted via some Hendrix “truther” website, found this thread by a google search and revived it… I could probably prove it, but I’m busy watching the Colts and Patsies
Another weak and feeble trolling attempt from Flysquatter aka Buster. More word games and speculation based on a phony theory No hospital documentation shows any procedures performed on Hendrix. Nothing about wine exists anywhere on any hospital or autopsy report but this troll desperately looks for anything to claim his imaginary wine.
FLYSWATTER says: Jason still has no answer to “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make an estimate of 100mg blood alcohol ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion”, if there was ‘no wine’, as Sister Ivana Sow and her piglet twin brother keep trying to decree?
JASON says: Hendrix was never drowned in wine as you falsely claim. The autopsy results refutes your fake “wine drowning” claim. No wine was ever established drowning Hendrix on any report.
FLYSWATTER says: And Jason still has no answer to “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink” if there was no wine, as Jason keeps self-decreeing?
No, it wasn’t the autopsy report, as it’s already been proven that there is no way possible that Dr. Brown could have been citing the autopsy when Brown made reference to Jimi having “a bit too much to drink”, as the autopsy states Jimi’s blood alcohol content was .005% and that what Dr. Teare was talking about regarding 100mg was only an estimation at the time of Vesperax ingestion. Dr. Brown has never made reference to the autopsy data at any time, anywhere. Dr. Brown was citing what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots — there is no other possibility.
JASON says: You haven’t proven anything, moron. Brown made his comments 42 years after Hendrix’s death citing the report that everybody knows. That is a fact. Wine trolls make bogus excuses for their debunked hoax.
FLYSWATTER says: Jason continues to show his ignorance by repeatedly claiming “no wine” and then trying to refer to the 100mg estimate by Dr. Teare to try to support his lie about Dr. Brown citing the autopsy report.
JASON says: More b.s. from this troll. Hendrix was never drowned in wine. Any alcohol that was determined from the autopsy was from the parties earlier, not from your fake “wine drowning”.
FLYSWATTER says: And still no answer to……….
*** We’ve seen Jason repeatedly blather that “the ambulance attendants didn’t see any wine”.
But when you click this link and go to the bottom of the page, read what Michael Fairchild says:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell2.html
Notice at the bottom of the page Fairchild says in blue text:
“Doctors and attendants who handled Jimi’s body recall him being covered with a large amount of red wine”.
It raises the obvious question:
Why would Fairchild — who was there in the early 1990’s speaking directly to these people — publish that statement, if there was no wine witnessed by these men, as Jason keeps self-decreeing?
Of course, the correct answer is that they all saw the wine & Jason is a blatant liar with his self- decree of “no wine” & Jason just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
JASON says: John Saua and Reginal Jones and Ian Smith stated nothing about wine in their testimonies. No wine was ever documented “covering” or “flooding” Jimi in any medical report. So you lose again with your phony hoax.
FLYSWATTER says: Also on that page, when we look at Dr. Seifert’s statement, he also says:
“After we worked on Jimi – we didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix until later on – I remember just a vague memory of a bit of fuss going on in admissions, but it could have been anything, it was a casualty ward.”
Notice the words “After we worked on Jimi”? And yet we have Jason claiming that Seifert is saying that “no treatment was done” & Jason obviously omitting that part of Seifert’s statement, because Seifert is telling us that they did work on Jimi. And the hospital report that has “Time of Treatment: 11:45AM to 12:15PM”, written on it that was most likely written by the Medical Registrar — none other than Dr. Seifert.
If there were “no treatment done”, as Jason keeps trying to delude himself with this self-decreed fabrication pulled out of his ass, then Seifert never uses those words “After we worked on Jimi”. Seifert clearly states that they did work on Jimi.
JASON says: More b.s. from this wine troll playing word games. Siefert said a “few minutes” and never talked about fake a half hour “wine removal”. There is noting documented for “wine removal” on Jimi’s medical record. So your hoax is debunked yet again. More word games from this wine troll.
FLYSWATTER says: Jason can’t claim that Fairchild is making this up to sell a book, because that site has been up on web and free for anyone to read for well over a decade.***
JASON says: John Saua and Reginal Jones testified to only witnessing vomit. There is nothing about wine from John Saua, Reginal Jones, or Ian Smith. Nothing about wine exists on any Hendrix medical record. Another hoax debunked.
FLYSWATTER says: And again, because Jason can’t answer or refute it………
The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” and no matter how much Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, it does not change or alter that fact that a resuscitation attempt was made and treatment was done for 30 minutes from 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Those are the documented facts that Jason’s lying misquotes can’t get around.
This 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book ‘Inside the Experience”, published in 1990, and that info was most likely gotten from the hospital report. Mitch doesn’t get anything wrong, as Jason tries to self-decree, because Jason can’t refute the 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame that is referenced in Mitch’s book.
JASON says: Mitch’s book is not documentation and nothing states a “wine removal” was performed on any Hendrix medical file or autopsy report. Nothing about wine ever existed on Hendrix’s medical file. Hospitals don’t do “procedures” on a dead 6 hour corpse. Another hoax debunked.
FLYSWATTER says: Anybody can go to You Tube and watch the video “The Last 24 Hours” and if they watch closely, they will see the coroner’s form and see where it says “Unable to Resuscitate”.
None of Jason’s blather about “the hospital wouldn’t do this or that” can get around those documented facts.
JASON says: Flysquatter is a moron who knows nothing about hospital procedures. Even the basic formality is listed as “Unable to Resuscitate” when attempt is made cuz Hendrix was dead. What a total clown.
FLYSWATTER says: “JASON says:
November 6, 2019 at 4:18 pm
Thurston worked on many famous people and was a highly respected coroner. I wrote about this in my “Debunking the phony imbibed wine theory” series.
JASON says:
November 6, 2019 at 8:26 pm
I never spoke of Judy Garland, moron. Both death certificates states barbiturates. Nothing for Hendrix says anything about wine. nothing about wine anywhere”
You just did, DUMBASS. And were making reference to Sister Ivana Sow’s statement regarding Judy Garland. Nice job taking the bait.
JASON says: Sorry moron, I never talked about Judy Garland. You are pathetic and provide pure comedy gold.
TRANSLATED: Jason still has no answers — only the same blather that doesn’t debunk anything.
JASON says: Hendrix was never drowned in wine as you falsely claim. The autopsy results refutes your fake “wine drowning” claim. No wine was ever established drowning Hendrix on any report.”
TRANSLATED:
Jason still has no answer to “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make an estimate of 100mg blood alcohol ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion”, if there was ‘no wine’, as Sister Ivana Sow and her piglet twin brother keep trying to decree?
“JASON says: More b.s. from this wine troll playing word games. Siefert said a “few minutes” and never talked about fake a half hour “wine removal”. There is noting documented for “wine removal” on Jimi’s medical record. So your hoax is debunked yet again. More word games from this wine troll.”
TRANSLATED: Jason still has no answer to……….
*** We’ve seen Jason repeatedly blather that “the ambulance attendants didn’t see any wine”.
But when you click this link and go to the bottom of the page, read what Michael Fairchild says:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell2.html
Notice at the bottom of the page Fairchild says in blue text:
“Doctors and attendants who handled Jimi’s body recall him being covered with a large amount of red wine”.
It raises the obvious question:
Why would Fairchild — who was there in the early 1990’s speaking directly to these people — publish that statement, if there was no wine witnessed by these men, as Jason keeps self-decreeing?
Of course, the correct answer is that they all saw the wine & Jason is a blatant liar with his self- decree of “no wine” & Jason just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
How does Jason know that the ambulance men didn’t tell Fairchild directly that they saw wine? Jason doesn’t know that. Just wishful thinking.
“JASON says: John Saua and Reginal Jones testified to only witnessing vomit. There is nothing about wine from John Saua, Reginal Jones, or Ian Smith. Nothing about wine exists on any Hendrix medical record. Another hoax debunked.”
The ambulance men never stated that they saw vomit “only”. The word “only” is never used by the ambulance men — only by Jason.
Still doesn’t answer “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make an estimate of 100mg blood alcohol ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion”, if there was ‘no wine’, as Sister Ivana Sow and her piglet twin brother keep trying to decree?
“JASON says: Mitch’s book is not documentation and nothing states a “wine removal” was performed on any Hendrix medical file or autopsy report. Nothing about wine ever existed on Hendrix’s medical file. Hospitals don’t do “procedures” on a dead 6 hour corpse. Another hoax debunked.”
TRANSLATED: Jason still can’t get around….
The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” and no matter how much Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, it does not change or alter that fact that a resuscitation attempt was made and treatment was done for 30 minutes from 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Those are the documented facts that Jason’s lying misquotes can’t get around.
This 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book ‘Inside the Experience”, published in 1990, and that info was most likely gotten from the hospital report. Mitch doesn’t get anything wrong, as Jason tries to self-decree, because Jason can’t refute the 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame that is referenced in Mitch’s book.
“JASON says: Flysquatter is a moron who knows nothing about hospital procedures. Even the basic formality is listed as “Unable to Resuscitate” when attempt is made cuz Hendrix was dead. What a total clown.”
The clown suit is put on Jason by none other than Jason. If no resuscitation attempt was made, then Jimi would have been declared dead much sooner than 12:15PM and the coroner’s form would never have stated “Unable to Resuscitate”.
There are no reports to be found of “Unable to Resuscitate” regarding John Bonham or Bon Scott, both of whom died from vomit asphyxiation after heavy drinking binges.
“JASON says: Sorry moron, I never talked about Judy Garland. You are pathetic and provide pure comedy gold.”
Jason just did it twice. Pure comedy gold, indeed.
“JASON says:
November 6, 2019 at 8:26 pm
Your hoax has been flushed down the toilet.”
The only toilet flushing is located squarely between Jason’s ears.
Keep wallowing away, Jason.
More pathetic word games from a wine troll. This is hilarious.
Not one mention of the word wine anywhere by anyone.
This Hoaxer claims a “massive wine drowning” and not one word in a document or testimony about wine and this clown still claims wine.
Pure comedy gold.
“JASON says:
November 7, 2019 at 1:11 am
More pathetic word games from a wine troll. This is hilarious.
Not one mention of the word wine anywhere by anyone.
This Hoaxer claims a “massive wine drowning” and not one word in a document or testimony about wine and this clown still claims wine.
Pure comedy gold.”
TRANSLATED:
More pathetic denial of reality by the lying-denying pigbreeder (Jason) that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
Pure comedy gold that Jason can’t answer or refute any of the germane points made.
Hi Jason. These two are only capable of giving blinkered responses to anything we say. They can’t see beyond the wine. I mentioned Judy Garland to show the toxicity of barbiturates when taken but they did not get it. These are not only toxic when taken in high numbers immediately like Jimi was but also cause poisoning over a long period of time as in Judy’s case.
Hi Ivana,
That is if there are two different posters.
That’s what trolls do when their hoax is exposed since they have nothing left. Just to troll and post nonsense.
Anything that exposes their hoax they will still claim wine or a “cover up”.
“Buster” was laughed off other sites with these same bogus claims and he still doesn’t have any answers after 10 long years.
Now that’s hilarious!
Wine hoaxers have already lost their wine hoax since they have no evidence for their phony claims.
The official statement from St. Mary Abbots Hospital to the media stated that Hendrix died from an drug overdose. Nothing about wine, “long treatments”, long resuscitation attempts, “wine removal” was ever officially stated. The hospital confirmed it was a drug overdose. If there was all this wine, they would have stated it. There was no wine. It was confirmed as a drug overdose on 9/18/70.
Creepy ex Doctor Bannister was just an emergency room doctor and he had no authority to be doing “procedures” on Jimi Hendrix who was a 6 hour dead corpse. The heads at the hospital would never allow that to go on. No other doctor testified to doing “procedures” on Hendrix who was certified dead on arrival. A DOA does not get “treatments” done. They get shipped off to the morgue like Hendrix was which was reported in 1970.
John Saua stated that the Hendrix’s bowels spilled all over the inside of the ambulance meaning he was dead for hours. The doctors knew of this knowing Hendrix was dead for hours so no “procedures” were performed on a dead 6 hour corpse.
Creepy ex Doctor Bannister never is on record talking about a “hard plug of vomit” which means it does not exist. John Saua and and Reginal Jones never talked about a “hard plug of vomit” either. Buster the Hoaxer made this fake claim up so he could still peddle his phony wine claim.
Creepy ex Doctor Bannister said Jimi had a “drowning of the airways not an obstruction”. A “hard plug of vomit” is an obstruction so creepy ex Doctor Bannister refutes Buster the clown’s phony “hard plug of vomit” claim.
Creepy ex Doctor Bannister is lying cuz Reginal Jones and John Saua witnessed dry vomit all the way down Jimi’s throat. That is an obstruction testified by two men who saw Hendrix dead first. Also the autopsy report refutes ex creepy Doctor Bannister.
Buster the clown claimed that creepy ex Doctor Bannister illegally removed and dumped Hendrix’s bodily fluids down the drain destroying his autopsy results. This is a serious crime what Buster the clown is claiming.
There was no wine inside Jimi Hendrix cuz there is no record of it anywhere.
Wine hoaxers want you to believe in imaginary wine that was never documented or witnessed at the flat but they claim it exists.
A drug overdose shows the exact results of what happened to Jimi. A “drowning” would be the complete opposite.
Buster’s fake phony timeline is a joke since it is based on drugs and not wine. He is trying to refute documented evidence of drugs by trying to claim non existent wine.
Buster’s fake phony timeline is based on Jimi swallowing 9 pills at once. We have no idea if Jimi took all 9 pills in one setting.
Doctor Bob Brown stated Hendrix was dead for hours so no procedures were ever done on Hendrix.
Wine doesn’t “gush” from a windpipe as lying hoaxers claim.
Wine hoaxers have no answer as to why a 6 hour long dead corpse would have “procedures” performed when no hospital would ever do such a thing.
Wine hoaxers moronically believe a 6 hour long dead corpse could be brought back to life. Any sane individual knows that could never happen.
Since a 6 hour long dead corpse could never be brought back to life a hospital would never perform weird medical procedures on a dead corpse.
Here are some more lies from Buster the clown before he changed his fake claims and stories. Once again this proves this wine troll to be nothing but a fraud and a wine hoaxer.
BUSTER says: Bannister noted that obvious necrosis in Hendrix’s inner cheek suggested he had been dead for many hours.
JASON says: Well, that’s not what you’re saying now you fraud. You’re now trying to claim that the “doctors had no way of knowing how long Hendrix was dead for until Kathy told them.” You are a liar, a fraud, and a clown. We all laugh at you and your pathetic reversal attempts.
BUSTER says: Dr Bannister said that when he unplugged the vomit from Hendrix’s windpipe an unusual amount of wine gushed out, like bottles worth, and that he had never experienced anything like it.
BUSTER says: Dr Bannister specified that he removed a plug of vomit from Hendrix’s windpipe and the wine then gushed out.
BUSTER says: Doctor Bannister specifically said that after he had uncorked the plug of vomit in Hendrix’s windpipe that a large amount of wine was released and gushed out.
JASON says: This fraud has changed these phony claims of Bannister to now claiming Siefert removed a “hard plug of vomit”.
Siefert has testified to not performing any “procedures” on Hendrix. This fake claim is debunked.
Bannister never is on record talking a “hard plug of vomit”. This fake claim is debunked again.
No bottles of wine were ever documented on Hendrix’s medical record. This is debunked yet again.
Wine doesn’t “gush” from a windpipe since a windpipe doesn’t “gush” liquids. This is another ridiculous bullshit claim. Another fake hoax debunked.
BUSTER says: Dr Bannister specifically recalled that they had a large suction syringe used to remove fluids from the windpipe and that he had removed several tubes worth of wine and it was still flowing out. He said he had never witnessed anything like this and that it was unusual.
JASON says: What happened to Siefert being there first as you now claim? You fraud. Another fake story change by you. This is bogus since doctors don’t do work on a dead 6 hour corpse and if this was “so unusual” there would be official documentation of all this so called wine. No wine ever existed which is why it was never documented on 1970. Another fake claim is debunked.
BUSTER says: Hendrix was murdered this way, and it looks like he was, it would appear as the classic lethal combination of barbiturates and alcohol that it was. This suggests premeditation similar to Jeffery’s covert ops background. Or it could just suggest a crude murder by London thugs with wine who took advantage of the opportunity of Hendrix being passed out on sleeping pills. Again, according to the forensics, the manner of death strongly precludes Hendrix doing this on his own accidentally. And don’t forget the other surrounding lies and motives.
JASON says: This is called a phony contradicting conspiracy. Buster the fraud claims Jeffery killed Hendrix and then in the very next sentence says it could be “London thugs” who just happened to know Hendrix took 9 pills and then managed to get wine bottles to pour down his throat. What a freaking joke. This fraud just makes up crap as he goes along.
Hendrix was not “murdered” and this is just a hoax with a mish mash of “could be’s” “probably’s” and made up fake theories to stir the phony “murder” plot.
Once again this crap gets flushed down the toilet as a total hoax.
Hi Jason. Love what you wrote above really well researched. Buster is at it again with his crazy scenarios. Funny how Buster brings his religious figures into this story
with a holier than thou attitude while advocating for a crime that never happened and implicating innocent people in a cover up and murder. He then trolls excessively with his use of derogatory language and then says the devil sides with certain people. What a nutter. I’ve noticed he has also brought Justin into this argument again. Buster needs to be treated in exactly the same way he was on other forums and have the plug pulled on him again. After all he has had a 9 year run trying to convince us unsuccessfully that a murder took place.
Hi Ivana,
“Buster” is a coward who tries to silence people who refutes his bogus nonsense by bullying the moderators/owners to ban them. Funny thing is that “Buster” aka “Scrum Drum” is the one who ends up being banned. Just a troll who is laughed at on forums.
Radio shows are famous for putting crackpots on the air cuz it gains listeners and callers. I guess his name is Brian Doyle.
“Buster” still has no answers for his “main points” of his phony case and he made up new ones for all his old debunked theories. That proves it’s a hoax.
“Buster” claimed ” tons of “pure wine” was spilled all over the bed witnessed by “many people”. Now all that “pure wine” was soaked up by “super absorbent bedding” where “vomit means wine”. Worst trolling job ever.
Hi Jason. I’ve been listening to a radio broadcast of Buster/ Brian Doyle on Frank Mackay’s radio show recorded 6 months ago. Buster is described as a Hendrix researcher? Peddling the same stuff he does here. There’s no mistaking who it is. The programme is in three parts but I could only listen to it for a short while I’m really surprised he was given any airtime.
Get back to us when you can intelligently answer any of the substantive material in that radio interview Ivana…That’s why I am the person speaking to 3 million people in New York City and you are the internet troll who is pretending to have a credible opinion but isn’t fooling anyone…Only the lowest of the low take advantage of government corruption and hiding of evidence in order to falsely claim there’s no evidence…You couldn’t listen to it all because you aren’t interested in the evidence, you’re only interested in shallow trolling…
A psychologist would look at Jason’s protesting too much and say he was a person who was obviously unconsciously aware that Jimi was murdered and trying to deny it…Jason offers a silly, childish level of input that is mainly based on name-calling and denying the obvious via petty semantics and contrived discrepancies…If Jason were to try this in other forums where content was credibly scrutinized and posters were held accountable he would quickly be dispensed of as the booby hamper level poster he is…The more serious and properly overseen the forum Jason tried his nay-say trolling in the quicker he’d be properly controlled…If he tried this in court he’d be ejected and probably recommended for commitment…I blame Justin for this because Justin defended Jason and attacked me on the basis of free speech…But any credible overseer would see that Jason is abusing free speech with his juvenile trolling…A person who has no intention of honestly discussing facts is a person who should not be given automatic, guarded free speech rights…That’s the act of a fool who defends nuts and hooligans and their dishonest intentions over the best and brightest…Jason doesn’t deserve free speech protections because of his delinquent practices…A person who grants those protections anyway is one who isn’t taking responsibility for the result…
Jason said above in his pulp trolling, designed to use volume to escape evidence he’s not answering, that there was no Hospital Report…Jason scoffs at us that we don’t understand hospital procedures however he then turns around in his fever for denial and makes the ridiculous comment that there was no Hospital Report…In Jason’s need to deny everything we say he falls prey to his own compulsion and makes the stupid gaffe of denying the Hospital Report…Jason is a self-refuting fool because any simple consideration of what he is saying realizes that there had to be a Hospital Report because there couldn’t not be a Hospital Report…The only reason Jason is saying there was no Hospital Report is because he’s trying to taunt us with its denial, which is just silly, childish trolling that would normally incur censure on most credibly-overseen boards…Mitch Mitchell’s co-author John Platt was British and had access to the Hospital Report…The only reason this nut Jason is stupidly denying the Hospital Report’s existence is because he is aware Platt accessed it in England and entered its 11:45 to 12:15 treatment time in to his book…
The half hour treatment time entered on the Hospital Report verifies Dr Bannister and proves Dr Siefert perjured himself by omission…Rational, non-trolling minds realize that half hour is what was being referred to on the Inquest data sheet when it listed “Unable To Resuscitate”…Because Jason is here for demented, juvenile purposes he’s taunting us that no procedure was done on Jimi and hoping we’ll respond to his trolling…The half hour listed on the Hospital Report, combined with “Unable To Resuscitate” on the Inquest data sheet, along with Dr Bannister’s witnessing, all prove that 5 bottles of wine was removed from Jimi over 20 minutes of that half hour as directly related by Dr Bannister…The wine Dr Siefert commented was covering Jimi was wine spilled in the act of pouring it down his throat…
The way the Hospital Report was written is proof of Jimi’s attempted resuscitation by Siefert and Bannister…After that failed half hour attempt Siefert and Bannister retired to a rest area…They spent some time there recovering and then filled out the Hospital Report…The official time of death is not 12:15…12:15 was the time they stopped trying to save Jimi and quit the attempt…Siefert and Bannister then went to the doctor’s rest area where they recovered…The Hospital Report was then filled-out and Jimi was officially declared deceased at 12:45…That delay and final declaration of death at 12:45 is proof that a half hour resuscitation attempt was done on Jimi from 11:45 to 12:15, as listed on the Hospital Report, and that after the doctors had rested they filled-out the Hospital Report, that they were required to fill out, and declared Jimi Hendrix officially dead…This nut Jason responds to that by saying no report was filled-out…Again, a psychologist would quickly point-out that Jason is pathological and is obviously trying to deny something he is aware is true…If Jason tried trolling and denying the Hospital Report in any formal, credible venue he’d be tossed out on the street on his crazy ass like he deserves…
Above Jason trolls that I have offered a “fake, phony timeline”…Jason offers a one-line name-calling taunt but then doesn’t offer any intelligent follow-through…The reason for that is because once Jason showed some respect for the readers and actually attempted to show where I offered an inaccurate timeline he would not be able to do it…My timeline is based on Dr Rufus Crompton’s correct forensic determination that the grains of undigested rice in Jimi’s stomach proved Jimi died no later than 5:30am…All the barbiturate forensics, that Jason is treating with moronic non-response, are based on that correct time of death…According to firm barbiturate overdose pathology proven and referenced in the Underwriter Laboratory case histories for Vesparax overdoses, as well as the product manufacturer’s drug information list, there is no way that 9 Vesparax tablets could have overdosed Jimi with his famous tolerance, let alone made him profusely vomit only 1 or 2 hours after ingesting the pills…The timeline is key to that because it proves Jimi could not have had the pills in him for more than 1 or 2 hours, and you will not find any other Vesparax overdose with those extreme results because Jimi was not an overdose…He was a drowning in wine homicide made to appear like a drug overdose…The reason this nut Jason does not include any intelligent detail is because he knows it will inevitably lead to what I just wrote…
There is a seriously sick moral void involved with Jimi’s death and the evidence for it where even Jimi’s own fans aren’t afraid to take the dark path against this obvious evidence…There’s a serious lack of fear of God involved in the treatment of this subject where nuts like Jason aren’t afraid to violate the basic terms of moral decency and cross the line into the depraved…What would normally draw the scorn and dislike of the public, like Jason’s demented trolling, doesn’t seem to draw that usual reaction and persons who commit vile offenses of serious moral wickedness have no resistance and are free to commit them…People are real creeps and as long as the comfort of denial is handed to them to make them feel good they don’t seem to care whom it is that hands it to them or how…Jason is Satan’s helper and I have no doubt the Devil himself is Jason’s welcomed partner and source for the things he posts…There’s always some scumbag who is willing to argue the side of darkness as if it were some sick game…May Jason be damned for it…May he pay the price and punishment for the evil he commits…The wise realize that what was special about Jimi still attracts the evil that led to his death…
Same old usual boring long winded commentary from “Buster”. Another post full of nothing with the same debunked claims and zero evidence to back up what this clown says.
“Buster” aka “Scrum Drum” is a troll who was banned from every Hendrix site he posted on for abusive behavior. He still pathetically tries to bully Justin the owner for me to be banned after I exposed his hoax. This joker has zero credibility in the Hendrix community. He is a “wannabe” researcher who makes up his own phony “facts” for his “evidence”. We all have seen and read it.
“Buster” has no hospital report stating a “wine soaked Jimi” a “hard plug of vomit removal” or a “wine removal”. These are all fake accounts since it never happened.
There would be precise detailed reports of all of those accounts and “procedures” if it happened. There are no reports or documentation cuz it never happened. That’s why there never will be a report. These phony claims were made up in 1992.
There was never 5 bottles of wine. Buster made up this fake claim. Creepy ex Doctor Bannister is never on the official record stating 5 bottles. Dr. Siefert never stated any “wine removal”. This is all a hoax. No documentation exists of this ever happening.
Anytime a person is hooked up to a monitor in a resuscitation formality attempt, the death certificate says “unable to resuscitate” since an attempt was made. Hendrix was dead for 6 hours so it was only a formality since he was a stiff corpse.
Buster the clown still omits the powerful “black bomber” that killed Hendrix. Buster’s phony timeline is based on drugs trying to claim wine killed Hendrix cuz he had a tolerance to drugs. This is a freaking joke that brings pure comedy gold.
“Buster” obtains his incorrect information from another book as he calls himself a “Hendrix Authority” while he ignores direct evidence and testimony from medical professionals who viewed Hendrix’s dead body. Dr. Brown and Dr. Siefert both refute those books as they both said no “procedures were ever done on Hendrix”. A dead 6 hour corpse awaiting an autopsy doesn’t have procedures performed.
No wine was witnessed at the flat by ambulance men John Saua and and Reginal Jones. Officer Ian Smith said it was a routine overdose and Jones said Jimi choked on his vomit.
Buster the clown has no medical reports to state a “wine drowning” or “wine removal”. He can’t make phony claims with no evidence. He has no evidence. This is all a hoax.
BUSTER says: There is a seriously sick moral void involved with Jimi’s death and the evidence for it where even Jimi’s own fans aren’t afraid to take the dark path against this obvious evidence…There’s a serious lack of fear of God involved in the treatment of this subject where nuts like Jason aren’t afraid to violate the basic terms of moral decency and cross the line into the depraved…What would normally draw the scorn and dislike of the public, like Jason’s demented trolling, doesn’t seem to draw that usual reaction and persons who commit vile offenses of serious moral wickedness have no resistance and are free to commit them…People are real creeps and as long as the comfort of denial is handed to them to make them feel good they don’t seem to care whom it is that hands it to them or how…Jason is Satan’s helper and I have no doubt the Devil himself is Jason’s welcomed partner and source for the things he posts…There’s always some scumbag who is willing to argue the side of darkness as if it were some sick game…May Jason be damned for it…May he pay the price and punishment for the evil he commits…The wise realize that what was special about Jimi still attracts the evil that led to his death…
JASON says: “Buster” aka “Scrum Drum” once again with his Satan fetish. What is wrong with this guy? He needs serious help.
The only demented troll is “Buster” who has trolled websites for a decade with his “Hendrix Murder Hoax” making up any phony claim he can to promote his hoax.
This crazy rant is “Buster’s” way of saying he lost as he “damns me” for exposing his hoax. I’ll take that as his admission of defeat.
Jason’s trolling technique involves self-creating a false context and then speaking of it as if it were a firm reality…The two Hendrix websites I got banned from are Crosstown Torrents and Electric Guru…Crosstown is moderated by a particularly uncredible bastard named Gordon Johnson…Gordon is British so he’s imposing the British dislike to admit the evidence for Jimi’s murder under the guise of moderation…I had another Crosstown moderator tell me making Gordon moderator was a mistake and he didn’t approve of his moderation…So while Jason gives automatic credibility and authority to Johnson and his moderation in his defamation campaign against me, the truth is I was banned from Crosstown for posting the true facts that Gordon Johnson didn’t want to admit so he abused his power as moderator…Jason is a liar because the owner of Crosstown, neo-con Pat Peterson, came on and said the murder topic would not be allowed…Any smart, objective, honest person will see that no credible discussion of the murder topic goes on on Crosstown under that British censorship imposed by Johnson…So there we have Jason once again firmly endorsing darkness and corruption as the rule…
Electric Guru is run by a female twit named Cindy Garcia…When I started posting information that countered the lies Britisher Jim Hawthorn was posting Garcia came in and said the topic was to be disallowed because “It never goes anywhere”…That shallow-minded idiot had obviously not read the contents of what I posted because my material had actually finally shown the correct evidence like no one had ever done before…Cindy is an American who moved to London to run her own business…The conflict of interest there was plainly visible but that has no intelligent effect on the dumb-down mob that wants to restrict all input to their moronic level of photo and souvenirs…The co-moderator actually apologized for my banning but then didn’t put me back on…So Jim Hawthorn had no trouble posting his lies…It was only when I posted the facts he was lying around that I had membership issues based on some very moronic logic…This, of course, is a thing that Jason automatically credits the banners over and assigns them firm credibility and long as he can dishonestly form it into a slanderous rip against me…Just like the evidence he denies, when you get to the honest details it isn’t quite what our resident troll sells it as…Jason is a nut who complains that I am trying to censor him but then turns around and approves of my being censored on those two uncredible forums…
Jason uses word tricks and an egregious strawman to get around the Hospital Report…Jason’s style and methodology gives away his trolling intent…Instead of honestly answering for his denial that the Hospital Report existed he switches it to the Hospital Report not indicating Jimi was drowned in wine…But any intelligent person can see that this is just Jason trying to seize the narrative – no, the whole reality, in order to make it fit his contrived evidence-avoiding strawmen…Jason is trying to set the terms, and therefore dodge the point he is not answering, by saying that report never spelled-out any removal of the wine…But that is just Jason’s dishonest way of getting around answering for the fact the firmly-indicated half hour treatment time listed on that report is the evidence Jason calls for but then publicly avoids with dishonest trolling strawmen when asked to account for it…Jason is desperately trying to make his bullshit snake oil pitch the accepted narrative in this thread, but it isn’t working and it blows up on him no matter how many times he makes it due to its idiotically-visible trollishly deceptive nature…After Jason is done with his repeated trolling answers he still hasn’t answered for the half hour treatment time on the Hospital Report that indicates the wine removal…Jason’s weeks and weeks worth of trolling doesn’t make that half hour go away…
As is his usual practice Jason descends in to the even more stupid in order to double down on his denial trolling…Obviously this wasn’t made up in 1992 because the report existed at 12:45pm on 9-18…That’s why Jason is a nut because he tries to insult the intelligence of the reader with stuff like this…What Jason is avoiding is his strawman of the Hospital Report needing to contain the exact description of the removal of the hard plug of vomit and wine removal in exact wording was all covered by the entry “Asphyxiation on vomit due to barbiturate overdose”…The wine was simply covered by the word “vomit”…Jason knows this which is why he is so desperately dedicated to lying around it with his silly, childish, trolling word games passing as serious challenge…
Jason is once again publicly stupid…Not only did Dr Bannister tell me that he removed 5 bottles of wine from Jimi in person, but anyone who is skilled enough to pretend serious analysis of this event would realize that when Bannister said the wine went all the way to the throat, that the amount of wine that was beneath it would be about 5 bottles of wine according to human anatomy…Only a delinquent would ignore that the half hour listed on the Hospital Report also corroborates the 5 bottles of wine because it would take that long to remove…If what you see here looks like a nay-saying internet nut trolling a skilled expert, that’s because it is…Jason is a creature of darkness who thrives on the British authorities and their criminal avoidance of this evidence…
Jason is lying and avoiding Siefert’s quote that “We worked on Jimi”…Dr Bannister gave the true half hour time for that procedure and the Hospital Report confirmed it…Anyone with any sense will see Scotland Yard avoided interviewing the nurses because they would have confirmed it and therefore confirmed Siefert was avoiding something he knew was dangerous…Anyone can see Jason is just a leather-winged demon sent by Satan to disrupt the obvious evidence…What Jason isn’t answering is the fact Bon Scott and Bonham were dead just as long as Jimi and no resuscitation attempt was recorded on them…That’s because neither of those two had lungs and stomach flooded with wine like Jimi…Leather-winged troll Jason is flittering through the evidence trying to rework it, but its firm obviousness is winning out over his deception…Janis was dead for 14 hours before she was taken in and her report indicated she wasn’t stiff…
Jason repeats his previous lie about the Black Bomber, trying to make it the poison pill…But he ignores that the best pathologist in England, Dr Donald Teare, made no mention of it being contributory…Jason moronically ignores that the treatment for a barbiturate overdose would probably be a stimulant, which is what the Black Bomber was…That stimulant would counteract the barbiturate suppression of the nervous system and would therefore actually work against an overdose…Jason ignores all this and repeats his same idiotic claim over again…What Jason is doing is like a nut coming in to a distinguished symposium and shouting with his fingers in his ears…I hold Justin responsible for this…What is really happening here is Jason is splatting against the windscreen of firm evidence over and over and is not being held accountable for it…
Justin allows a clear internet troll to portray himself as offering the correct interpretation of the doctors and witnesses when anyone can read what Jason offers and see it is a nutty bastardization of what they actually said…Jason is doing this outrage in order to cover-up the fact he hasn’t answered for Siefert’s comment that Jimi was covered in red wine…Nor has he answered for Siefert’s failing to credibly respond to his sworn hypocratic oath and follow-through on the forensic meaning of that wine…Nowhere did Siefert respond to Bannister’s statement like he was required to do and Jason thinks we don’t see him hiding behind his bluff where he ignores the fact Scotland Yard was obligated by its duty and public trust to go to Siefert and ask about this directly…The fact they avoided that tells you all you need to know and Jason’s false demands for evidence don’t get around it…
Jason’s aggressive trolling is designed to get him around the fact that if Siefert witnessed wine covering Jimi at hospital then reality dictates the ambulance men had to witness that same wine at the Samarkand…Anyone can see Jason spinning word tricks to try and get around that but it isn’t working…It is obvious that Jason is trolling harder because he is aware he can’t answer Siefert’s witnessing of the wine or its meaning…
It is pretty clear who is trolling here and it isn’t me…
Talk about someone being full of themselves. Only their opinions matter and count and anyone who disagrees with them is an idiot or a moron. They never accept the reality of a situation and prefer to base their facts on suspicion and subterfuge. Jimi had a highly regarded team behind him and none of them suspected murder. But along comes Brian/Scrum Drum/Flyswatter/Buster decades later using various pseudonyms to hide behind and sees foul play when the evidence points to the contrary. This is the truth according to Buster or who ever he is not to be confused with the real events of that morning. They use tactics like long winded rants full of rhetorical language and pseudoscience and analysis to lure the reader in. They are also fond of playing the victim accusing the moderators of other sites of having a personal grudge when it is the content that they had an issue with. Crosstown Torrents and Electric Guru are very well run but they are essentially music forums. Just like he did here Buster wrote long statements and used derogatory language towards anyone who disagreed with so much so that they finally pulled the plug on him. In reality no one was interested in what he had to say it was too far fetched a murder contrived by Wright in a book dismissed as a fake but still clung on to by Buster with the supposed murderer in a foreign country and no where near a Notting Hill hotel room with five bottles of red wine in tow. Then we have the ludicrous scene where the doctors in casualty that morning are trying to revive a patient dead for several hours allegedly with red wine gushing everywhere but the renowned Dr. Teare fails to detect this and writes instead that Jimi died of inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication and years later Dr Crompton says that Jimi’s liver was so congested that he could not have survived. But how does Buster get around this important factor in Jimi’s death by saying of course that there had to have been a cover up and the key figures that morning were coerced into changing their findings. These are Buster’s opinions only and not to be confused with the real course of events that morning or the findings of the specialist in this case.
Buster the clown continues to desperately defend his bogus debunked scam after it’s been repeatedly shown to be hoax.
Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose just like St Mary Abbots hospital confirmed on 9/18/70. It was also confirmed by ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones. It was confirmed by Officer Ian Smith. It was confirmed by Dr. Bob Brown. It was made official by Dr. Teare and Dr. Thurston who did the autopsy and finalized the report.
No “procedures” were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix since he was a casualty of a drug overdose and not a phony “wine drowning”. Nothing is ever stated about “wine” anywhere. It is only about barbiturates and inhaled vomit. The phony wine claims started in 1992. These wine trolls have no evidence of documented wine from 1970, only phony wine claims post 1992. This proves these phony claims are a hoax since nothing about “wine” was ever documented.
Buster is a troll who was banned from many Hendrix websites, even wikipedia for trying to alter Michael Jeffery’s wiki page with his conspiracy garbage. They had enough of his abuse and banned him also.
Buster only wants his phony claims posted and viciously attacks anybody who refutes his garbage. That’s why he has been banned from various sites for his constant abuse.
BUSTER says: Jason uses word tricks and an egregious strawman to get around the Hospital Report…Jason’s style and methodology gives away his trolling intent…Instead of honestly answering for his denial that the Hospital Report existed he switches it to the Hospital Report not indicating Jimi was drowned in wine…But any intelligent person can see that this is just Jason trying to seize the narrative – no, the whole reality, in order to make it fit his contrived evidence-avoiding strawmen…Jason is trying to set the terms, and therefore dodge the point he is not answering, by saying that report never spelled-out any removal of the wine…But that is just Jason’s dishonest way of getting around answering for the fact the firmly-indicated half hour treatment time listed on that report is the evidence Jason calls for but then publicly avoids with dishonest trolling strawmen when asked to account for it…Jason is desperately trying to make his bullshit snake oil pitch the accepted narrative in this thread, but it isn’t working and it blows up on him no matter how many times he makes it due to its idiotically-visible trollishly deceptive nature…After Jason is done with his repeated trolling answers he still hasn’t answered for the half hour treatment time on the Hospital Report that indicates the wine removal…Jason’s weeks and weeks worth of trolling doesn’t make that half hour go away…
JASON says: The only one playing word games is you using a fake “straw man” as a phony excuse. For almost 4 months I’ve been asking you for real documentation of wine. You ignore it each time I post and never produce any evidence of all this “wine” you claim.
Any person that goes to the hospital has everything documented on their official medical record. Every person on Earth knows this. Your phony hoax requires an alternate reality where Jimi had all this “work ” done on him and nothing is ever documented but you claim it still happened. Sorry, it doesn’t work that way. Everything is documented and your phony claims do not exist.
You are claiming this “massive wine drowning” took place. If this happened, it would definitely be on Jimi’s medical record. If there were all these “major procedures” done like you claim, there would be medical reports that these”procedures” were performed in 1970. No documentation ever exists which means these “procedures” were not performed. Jimi died of a drug overdose, not a fake “wine drowning” as you lie about, so no “procedures” were ever performed. That’s why no documentation exists.
Jimi Hendrix was a dead 6 hour corpse when he arrived at the hospital. Two doctors are documented as saying “nothing was done on Hendrix. But Buster the troll keeps lying claiming there was.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” -Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: Dr. Martin Siefert is telling Buster the clown that no “half hour procedures” were done on Hendrix. Siefert is telling Buster that Hendrix was already dead in the re-sus room “unable to resuscitate” since he was already dead. Siefert then clearly says “there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead”, but Buster the clown believes what he reads in his fiction books over the doctor who tended to a dead Hendrix. This is documented evidence that nothing was done for Hendrix. That’s why there is no medical records for any “so called procedures” since nothing more was done. All these bogus claims comes from fiction books and Buster the clown’s lies. Dead 6 hour people don’t get “half hour treatments” cuz they are officially dead.
“The man had been dead some time. The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
JASON says: Dr Brown is telling Buster the clown that Hendrix was already dead for hours and no “revival was possible” since he was a dead 6 hour corpse. How much more clear can the man be? But Buster still lies and ignores this claiming “procedures” were still done. Brown clearly states Hendrix died from an overdose. That means thee was no “wine”, and since there was no “wine”, there was no phony “procedures” done on Jimi Hendrix. That’s why no documentation exists of “wine” cuz there never was any.
BUSTER says: As is his usual practice Jason descends in to the even more stupid in order to double down on his denial trolling…Obviously this wasn’t made up in 1992 because the report existed at 12:45pm on 9-18…That’s why Jason is a nut because he tries to insult the intelligence of the reader with stuff like this…What Jason is avoiding is his strawman of the Hospital Report needing to contain the exact description of the removal of the hard plug of vomit and wine removal in exact wording was all covered by the entry “Asphyxiation on vomit due to barbiturate overdose”…The wine was simply covered by the word “vomit”…Jason knows this which is why he is so desperately dedicated to lying around it with his silly, childish, trolling word games passing as serious challenge…
JASON says: Here we go with Buster”s fake word games of “vomit means wine”. How pathetic can this deranged troll be? He claims all this “wine” exists, but plays word games downgrading his phony “wine drowning” to vomit. The pathetic lies of a desperate troll.
Yes folks, Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose by suffocating on his own vomit
just like the official report says. If there was a fake “wine drowning” as Buster the clown lies about. the report would have said “drowned in wine”. The report never says one word about the fake “cause of death” this wine troll claims which is “wine”. If “wine” was the culprit, it would be officially stated. This troll has no evidence of wine so he has to play word games saying “vomit is wine” cuz he has zero evidence. What this troll doesn’t understand is that a “wine drowning” causes a different reaction and evidence than a drug overdose. Nothing about Jimi’s death indicates anything about a “drowning”.
No hospital report on Jimi Hendrix says a “hard plug of vomit removal” or a “wine removal”. By law, this is required to be documented on Jimi’s medical record. Nothing ever exists which means it did not happen. Also, hospitals do not perform “procedures” on a dead 6 hour corpse. Buster the clown lost his phony hoax.
BUSTER says: Jason is once again publicly stupid…Not only did Dr Bannister tell me that he removed 5 bottles of wine from Jimi in person, but anyone who is skilled enough to pretend serious analysis of this event would realize that when Bannister said the wine went all the way to the throat, that the amount of wine that was beneath it would be about 5 bottles of wine according to human anatomy…Only a delinquent would ignore that the half hour listed on the Hospital Report also corroborates the 5 bottles of wine because it would take that long to remove…If what you see here looks like a nay-saying internet nut trolling a skilled expert, that’s because it is…Jason is a creature of darkness who thrives on the British authorities and their criminal avoidance of this evidence…
JASON says: Here’s another phony claim by Buster of a “private conversation” he had with creepy ex Doctor Bannister for his fake “evidence”. Buster is making a claim that a serious crime took place. Buster is telling us that Dr. Bannister removed and dumped out bodily fluids from Jimi Hendrix which destroyed Jimi’s autopsy results. An investigation should be launched into this claim cuz this is a criminal act.
This is a hoax cuz Bannister claimed he used a small metal sucker to clear wine. It would take hours to clear all that wine out from Hendrix with that small instrument. That tool is not powerful since it’s designed to protect the throat from being damaged. It would take several hundred of attempts to manually suck all that wine out since that small sucker doesn’t hold much liquid and is not powerful.
Creepy ex Doctor Bannister was just an emergency room doctor and had no authorization to be doing “procedures” on a dead corpse awaiting an autopsy. The heads of the hospital would not allow it and Dr. Siefert said it never happened in his testimony. Dr. Brown confirmed it didn’t happen as well. Bannister is a convicted fraud who lost his medical license back in 1992 when he started the phony wine claims. Both ambulance men never witnessed wine in Jimi’s throat only dry vomit. The fake “hard plug of vomit” is a hoax since Fraud Bannister has never publicly stated it,
Also, Buster is a lying fraud. We have comments from him years ago claiming it was 3 bottles of wine, then it became 4, and now it’s 5 bottles. Buster is a hoaxing troll telling us a phony unbelievable story to promote this sham.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying and avoiding Siefert’s quote that “We worked on Jimi”…Dr Bannister gave the true half hour time for that procedure and the Hospital Report confirmed it…Anyone with any sense will see Scotland Yard avoided interviewing the nurses because they would have confirmed it and therefore confirmed Siefert was avoiding something he knew was dangerous…Anyone can see Jason is just a leather-winged demon sent by Satan to disrupt the obvious evidence…What Jason isn’t answering is the fact Bon Scott and Bonham were dead just as long as Jimi and no resuscitation attempt was recorded on them…That’s because neither of those two had lungs and stomach flooded with wine like Jimi…Leather-winged troll Jason is flittering through the evidence trying to rework it, but its firm obviousness is winning out over his deception…Janis was dead for 14 hours before she was taken in and her report indicated she wasn’t stiff…
JASON says: Buster rants about his Satan fetish again. Buster is angry cuz I’ve exposed his hoax and the fake stories he tries to sell you.
“We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes” -Dr. Martin Siefert
Buster the clown lies about what Dr. Siefert stated. Siefert said a “few minutes”. A “few minutes” is not a half hour like Buster lies about.
Jimi was hooked up as a formality like Siefert stated and Buster is lying about Joplin as well.
BUSTER says: Jason repeats his previous lie about the Black Bomber, trying to make it the poison pill…But he ignores that the best pathologist in England, Dr Donald Teare, made no mention of it being contributory…Jason moronically ignores that the treatment for a barbiturate overdose would probably be a stimulant, which is what the Black Bomber was…That stimulant would counteract the barbiturate suppression of the nervous system and would therefore actually work against an overdose…Jason ignores all this and repeats his same idiotic claim over again…What Jason is doing is like a nut coming in to a distinguished symposium and shouting with his fingers in his ears…I hold Justin responsible for this…What is really happening here is Jason is splatting against the windscreen of firm evidence over and over and is not being held accountable for it…
JASON says: You are being held responsible for your blatant lies and have been outed as a fraud suppressing real evidence in favor of your phony claims.
Buster pathetically attacks Justin again cuz Buster the clown wants the real evidence suppressed.
Buster uses speculation and ignoring the “black bomber” based on his phony timeline. Buster the clown has no idea how Jimi took the 9 pills. He is basing his fake timeline on Jimi taking all 9 pills at once. We have no idea if he took a few first and then more after. He bases his phony timeline on a drug overdose where he tries to claim it was “imaginary wine” that killed Jimi. He hides the fact that a powerful upper caused a severe reaction that killed Jimi.
Dr. Teare clearly stated the toxic level of drugs n Hendrix’s system which included uppers and downers. Everybody knows when you mix both together in a powerful dosage it will kill you. Dr. Teare says nothing about “wine” in his findings which would have been detected in the forensic analysis inside Hendrix. This evidence debunks the wine hoax.
BUSTER says: Justin allows a clear internet troll to portray himself as offering the correct interpretation of the doctors and witnesses when anyone can read what Jason offers and see it is a nutty bastardization of what they actually said…Jason is doing this outrage in order to cover-up the fact he hasn’t answered for Siefert’s comment that Jimi was covered in red wine…Nor has he answered for Siefert’s failing to credibly respond to his sworn hypocratic oath and follow-through on the forensic meaning of that wine…Nowhere did Siefert respond to Bannister’s statement like he was required to do and Jason thinks we don’t see him hiding behind his bluff where he ignores the fact Scotland Yard was obligated by its duty and public trust to go to Siefert and ask about this directly…The fact they avoided that tells you all you need to know and Jason’s false demands for evidence don’t get around it…
JASON says: The only troll is you “Buster” aka “Scrum Drum”, Brian Doyle, who has been called a troll on many sites, and you have been banned from them for trolling.
Now you attack the owner demanding the people who expose your lies to be banned. You are a hypocrite and a coward. You can’t even defend your fake claims.
No wine is ever documented on Jimi’s medical report saying he “was covered in wine”. That would be documented if it was legitimate. Nothing is documented, so that proves it did not happen. Hospitals document everything when a person comes to the hospital.
More fake stories and zero evidence of “wine”. Produce some documentation of “wine” you wine troll.
BUSTER says: Jason’s aggressive trolling is designed to get him around the fact that if Siefert witnessed wine covering Jimi at hospital then reality dictates the ambulance men had to witness that same wine at the Samarkand…Anyone can see Jason spinning word tricks to try and get around that but it isn’t working…It is obvious that Jason is trolling harder because he is aware he can’t answer Siefert’s witnessing of the wine or its meaning…
JASON says: More projection and another fake conspiracy story from a banned Hendrix troll.
John Saua and Reginal Jones, who were the ambulance men, witnessed no wine at the flat. Jones said Jimi choked on vomit
Officer Ian Smith saw no wine either and confirmed the call by Saua was a routine overdose.
This means no wine on Jimi at the flat means n wine on Jimi at the hospital.
No documentation exists of Jimi ‘”being covered in wine” on any hospital report. By law that would be required to document. Noting exists which proves it didn’t happen and the wine scam is all a hoax.
BUSTER says: It is pretty clear who is trolling here and it isn’t me…
JASON says: You are a banned troll from many sites.
You make up fake claims and then change them to new ones after you’ve been debunked. We have all your fake claims and story changes documented. You are a troll.
Anyone with a healthy dose of skepticism or intelligence would ever be duped by this nonsense by Buster. To think he needed to invent various pseudonyms so he wouldn’t be caught out and to make it look as if he had support for what he was posting. I didn’t know he was also banned from Wikipedia for trying to change the Michael Jeffrey story; what a piece of work trashing the reputations of dead people who can’t defend themselves. What a champ time to hang up your gloves. LOL.
Ivana, I think you mean “chump”. LOL
Yes, I found out today “Buster” was banned from wikipedia for trying to promote his phony hoax by alerting Jeffery’s and Jimi’s page. He the blamed the moderators there for “covering up” his “good evidence”.
Now he attacks Justin again in each of his deranged posts as he mentions Satan again.
Buster is a legend in his own mind who think he’s an “authority” based on phony claims and imaginary wine.
Here’s another lie from “Buster” aka Brian Doyle who trolls the real evidence with his phony “Hendrix murder claims”. He is refuted by Reuters from 10/4/70 when Janis Joplin died.
BUSTER says: Janis was dead for 14 hours before she was taken in and her report indicated she wasn’t stiff…
October 5, 1970
“Janis Joplin Dies; Rock Star Was 27”
By REUTERS:
HOLLYWOOD, Oct. 4 — Janis Joplin, the rock singer, was found dead in her Hollywood apartment tonight. She was 27 years old.
The cause of death was not immediately determined, but the police said she apparently died of an overdose of drugs. They said she had been dead for about two hours when she was found shortly after 10 P.M.
JASON says: “Buster” is clearly refuted again by documented evidence. Reuters says that Joplin was dead for about two hours when she was found dead. Not 14 like “Buster” aka Brian Doyle pathetically lied about. Does this clown still think he won’t be fact checked and proved to be the pathological liar that he is?
Janis Joplin was found dead 4 hours less than Jimi Hendrix was and she didn’t get no “treatments” performed on her.
Jimi Hendrix was dead four hours longer which means his body would be in worse condition and no “procedures” were ever performed since he was a stiff corpse with a black rotting mouth. Hendrix was a drug overdose as well that was correctly reported two weeks earlier.
Janis Joplin was found dead for two hours and had no “half hour resuscitation attempts” cuz she was already dead.
Jimi Hendrix was dead for 4 hours longer than Janis Joplin which proves no “procedures” were performed just like Dr. Martin Siefert and Dr. Bob Brown are documented as saying since Hendrix was already dead and nothing could be done for him.
This once again cements the real evidence and the official cause of Jimi’s death and destroys the phony wine hoax once again!
“Buster the clown” aka Brian Doyle has just destroyed his phony hoax even more, and once again, he does it to himself, this time by posting about Janis Joplin.
Thank you very much!
Here’s another time we can flush this crap hoax down the toilet.
Dumb…
The 14 hours was when they did the autopsy that determined Janis had no rigor mortis…It was 14 hours after she died…
This was in relation to your saying Jimi was stiff and dead…Janis’s lack of rigor after 14 hours proves that isn’t necessarily true…
The more jumping up and down you do in relation to a point that blows up in your face the dumber and more trollish you look…
Sorry troll, this was already documented and you look like a fool attempting to discredit it.
Here’s another blatant lie from “Buster” who is very angry that his “Hendrix wine hoax” was exposed as a fraud.
BUSTER says: Justin allows a clear internet troll to portray himself as offering the correct interpretation of the doctors and witnesses when anyone can read what Jason offers and see it is a nutty bastardization of what they actually said.
“We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes” -Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: Buster is lying again out of rage and anger attacking Justin the site owner. Dr. Martin Siefert clearly says Hendrix was worked on for only a few minutes and not a “half hour” like Buster lies about. This is exactly what I’ve been posting. Why are you lying Buster?
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” -Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: Siefert says Jimi was already dead in the re-sus room “unable to resuscitate” . He pounded his heart twice and did nothing more for him since he was already dead for 6 hours. No “procedures” were ever done. Siefert said it.
This is what I’ve been posting the entire time, but this lunatic keeps claiming “procedures” were done cuz he read it in some book. Here is the actual doctor telling Buster no “procedures” were ever performed but he still lies claiming there was. I’ve been saying this the entire time that “no procedures were done”. Siefert clearly states this in his documented testimony. Buster then gets angry and claims a bogus “cover up” since his hoax is exposed as a sham.
So, where is this “nutty bastardization” that you claim “Buster”? Where is it you wine troll? These are the exact words from Siefert that YOU take out of context with your wine crap that doesn’t exist.
You are a clear internet troll that has been banned on many sites.
It isn’t working Jason…You and Ivana are propagandists and a classic example of internet experts…You know nothing about this…You’ve done no hands-on research or interviews with original witnesses…You are skimming the internet and hoping to pass yourselves off as knowledgeable experts but it is clear you are trolls who learned about this for the first time from this thread…You’re simply nay-say or denial trolling and Justin is letting you get away with it…Oh I wish I was moderator of this page so two trolls could go to permanent sleepy time…
Jason is lying above and trying to use contrived bullshit to avoid admitting that the half hour written in the Hospital Report under “Treatment Time” is proof 5 bottles of wine was removed from Jimi at St Mary Abbots…Very simply Dr Bannister said they took 20 minutes to suction the wine from Jimi, along with another 10 minutes to ventilate, and there you see that half hour written in stone in the Hospital Report…Jason is in contemptuous trolling denial of this and his lengthy bullshit is his attempt to get around it…Please look at Jason’s response to his evasion of the half hour treatment time…It is just a repeat of the same bullshit he used to avoid the point before…When you deliberately use dishonest reasoning to avoid a point you know you can’t answer that is known in internet vernacular as “trolling”…Nowhere in his response does he ever attempt to address that half hour or explain why the bullshit he wrote serves to get around it…This becomes a failure in moderation problem at this point…The half hour treatment time is real documentation of the wine for the reason that Jason can’t answer it…That makes it documentation…Jimi did have this procedure documented…As Jason already knows, it was documented when they wrote “Unable To Resuscitate” and listed a half hour treatment time that Jason conspicuously can’t answer in public…According to Jason’s demented logic, even though they only treated Jimi for a few minutes, the people who treated him decided to write a half hour for the treatment time on the Hospital Report…
Jason is stupid because the very Wikipedia ‘Death Of Jimi Hendrix’ page he cites has mostly Tony Brown in its foot-noting…Brown was a staunch advocate that Jimi was murdered…Also Jason is a slanderous liar…Nowhere can he cite me being abusive on Wikipedia…That’s because Jason is a troll who is pulling that out of his ass…
You would have to be an idiot to take Jason’s desperate excuse-making about the vomit seriously…The doctors saw the vomit outside of Jimi and assumed the wine was part of the same vomit…Jason is a liar because Dr Bannister already made this clear…The wine WAS listed on the Hospital Report when it was described as “Asphyxiated On Vomit Due To Barbiturate Overdose”…So it was documented…Anybody can see Jason is desperately trying to lie his way around it with silly excuses…He’s obviously trying too hard to deny something he knows is true…
Jason is lying because in 1990 Kathy Etchingham did satisfy Jason’s demand for documentation when she got the ambulance men to describe the hard dry plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat…That is the documentation Jason calls for but then tries to get around with crazy word games…Jason is lying because the wine was documented in the Hospital Report when they wrote “Asphyxiated On Vomit Due To Barbiturate Overdose”…That satisfies Jason’s demand for documentation…He is crazy enough to think people will take his trolling demand for precise descriptions of this seriously…But don’t forget Bannister documented it when he reported it to Glebbeek…Scotland Yard’s disinterest is proof of a cover-up that Jason’s idiotic bullshit won’t get around…
Just to prove how stupid Jason is, I will eventually make that recorded conversation with Bannister public…It shows what a loose grip on reality Jason has that he is stupid or crazy enough to set himself up by denying it…Jason is a nut who is making up crap as he goes…We know the hospital suction device took 20 minutes to remove 5 bottles of wine…So that right there tells you the capacity of the suction tube…The rest is just Jason pulling stupid denial out of his ass…While Jason slanders Bannister like a crazy troll what he doesn’t do is answer how Bannister managed to form a multi-million dollar medical consultation business with no such issues for the rest of his career?…No answer to that from Jason…Bannister was discredited because he witnessed a political assassination…
Jason is so full of shit…He is unable to give any coherent, direct answer to the fact that if the Black Bomber were as contributory to the drug toxicity as he claims Teare would have mentioned it…The reason Teare didn’t is because he knew a stimulant, in the case of a barbiturate overdose, would actually work in favor of Jimi and his survival…That’s why the doctors Monika hired concluded the pills would not have killed Jimi…The .7mg barbiturate blood level is what they go by…The rest is just Jason putting up a smokescreen of bullshit because he can’t answer the basic point…Jason uncredibly and stupidly ignores that my correct timeline proves none of this was possible in the only 1 to 2 hours Jimi had the pills inside him…Jason says “phony timeline” but he comes up notice-ably short in the backing that up with intelligent facts department…What that shows is he can’t credibly answer my correct timeline short of embarrassing name-calling…
It is clear that Jason is intellectually out-gunned and anyone could see the booby level of his input…He’s obviously not playing with a full deck if he thinks he’s getting away with it…He sounds like Bart Kamp – who is a nut from the Kennedy assassination research websites…In any case if we found out who Jason was you would quickly see he is an uncredible person with dubious motives…Jason has obviously incurred some kind of self-induced mental illness because he fails to grasp that the bullshit he wrote doesn’t get him around the fact Siefert said “Jimi was covered in red wine”…This is an interesting case of mental illness because you can see Jason trying to convince himself that his silly canard, that the wine had to be mentioned on the Hospital Report, makes the wine Siefert spoke of go away…You can see Jason hiding from the reality that Siefert saying in plain language that Jimi was covered in wine is that proof and that Jason’s sophist contrivance, that he doesn’t have to recognize Siefert’s statement because it wasn’t written on the report, is adequate reason to ignore it…But for mentally sound persons that is obviously a sick troll trying to convince himself his evidence denial is valid and he is getting away with not admitting undeniable evidence in broad daylight…For the reality-oriented, Siefert saying Jimi was covered in wine is that evidence plain and simple and no amount of trolling logic can make it go away…Justin is not holding Jason accountable to this…Jason’s desperate use of ad hominem only furthers this…
Jason’s troll status is proven by the fact he challenges Dr Siefert’s statement that Jimi was covered in wine…This alone proves that Jason isn’t to be taken seriously…When David Kramer’s documentary comes out we will see Siefert saying that in his own words and Jason will be delegated to the trolling nut department he has earned…Reality dictates that wine, that was witnessed covering Jimi at St Mary Abbots, had to be covering Jimi at the Samarkand so Jason’s lying contrivances and misquotes will be proven to be the trolling bullshit they are…
Stupid…
More garbage from a wine troll who has no documented evidence of wine on Jimi’s hospital record. Nothing was ever documented cuz it doesn’t exist.
We all know you are a troll who was banned for perpetrating a hoax on all these sites.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying because the wine was documented in the Hospital Report when they wrote “Asphyxiated On Vomit Due To Barbiturate Overdose”
JASON says: LMAO nothing about wine is documented you troll.
A Barbiturate Overdose is not wine, moron.
Nothing about wine ever exists.
No documented records of wine is ever stated by anyone. It’s always about drugs
You’ve fantasized all this bogus wine in your crazy head as you continue your hoax.
Your word games are a joke and you make yourself a clown in every post.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
“Buster” is clearly refuted again by documented evidence. Reuters says that Joplin was dead for about two hours when she was found dead. Not 14 like “Buster” aka Brian Doyle pathetically lied about. Does this clown still think he won’t be fact checked and proved to be the pathological liar that he is?
Janis Joplin was found dead 4 hours less than Jimi Hendrix was and she didn’t get no “treatments” performed on her.
Jimi Hendrix was dead four hours longer which means his body would be in worse condition and no “procedures” were ever performed since he was a stiff corpse with a black rotting mouth. Hendrix was a drug overdose as well that was correctly reported two weeks earlier.
Janis Joplin was found dead for two hours and had no “half hour resuscitation attempts” cuz she was already dead.”
Got news for the slimy lying piece of pigshit named Jason. Try looking at Janis Joplin’s autopsy, ASSHOLE.
Click to access joplin,%20janis_report.pdf
It clearly states on page 7 that the liver temperature reading taken at 11:00PM on Oct. 4, 1970 was 80 degrees Fahrenheit. If Janis had been dead for only 2 hours, as Jason claims from his fake source of Reuters, than the liver temperature reading would have been much higher. Everybody knows the average normal body temperature is 98.6 Fahrenheit.
Algor mortis testing is done to determine the estimated time of death and one can read about how it is calculated here:
https://coronertalk.com/28
No such test was ever reported to be done on Jimi Hendrix, meaning the medical staff had no idea how long Jimi had been dead for.
Janis Joplin’s autopsy report clearly refutes Jason and Reuters. Janis Joplin had indeed been dead for 12+ hours and her autopsy proves it.
Jason once again makes himself look STUPID — but we already knew that about Jason anyways.
Jason still has no answer to “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make an estimate of 100mg blood alcohol ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion”, if there was ‘no wine’, as Sister Ivana Sow and her piglet twin brother keep trying to decree?
Jason still can’t get around….
The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” and no matter how much Jason keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, it does not change or alter that fact that a resuscitation attempt was made and treatment was done for 30 minutes from 11:45AM to 12:15PM. Those are the documented facts that Jason’s lying misquotes can’t get around.
This 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book ‘Inside the Experience”, published in 1990, and that info was most likely gotten from the hospital report. Mitch doesn’t get anything wrong, as Jason tries to self-decree, because Jason can’t refute the 11:45AM to 12:15PM time frame that is
referenced in Mitch’s book.
And Jason still has no answer to “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink” if there was no wine, as Jason keeps self-decreeing?
No, it wasn’t the autopsy report, as it’s already been proven that there is no way possible that Dr. Brown could have been citing the autopsy when Brown made reference to Jimi having “a bit too much to drink”, as the autopsy states Jimi’s blood alcohol content was .005% and that what Dr. Teare was talking about regarding 100mg was only an estimation at the time of Vesperax ingestion. Dr. Brown has never made reference to the autopsy data at any time, anywhere. Dr. Brown was citing what he saw of Jimi when Jimi arrived at St. Mary Abbots — there is no other possibility.
Jason continues to show his stupidity by repeatedly claiming “no wine” and then trying to refer to the 100mg estimate by Dr. Teare to try to support his lie about Dr. Brown citing the autopsy report.
Jason lies when he says Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown said “no treatment” was done. They never stated any such thing & Jason has no reference source to back up his claim, as it is just another self-decreed fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass.
Dr. Seifer states not once, but TWICE, that they did work on Jimi and the reference source can be seen here:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell2.html
Also, at the bottom of that same page Michael Fairchild says in blue text:
“Doctors and attendants who handled Jimi’s body recall him being covered with a large amount of red wine”.
It raises the obvious question:
Why would Fairchild — who was there in the early 1990’s speaking directly to these people — publish that statement, if there was no wine witnessed by these men, as Jason keeps self-decreeing?
Of course, the correct answer is that they all saw the wine & Jason is a blatant liar with his self- decree of “no wine” & Jason just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
More bogus commentary from a wine clown but still unable to produce any hospital documentation of wine he claims.
BUSTER says: Jason is a nut who complains that I am trying to censor him but then turns around and approves of my being censored on those two uncredible forums.
JASON says: I’m not complaining. I am stating a fact.
You have been trying to censor Ivana and myself for months on here. You’ve called for us both to be banned. Now you are publicly attacking Justin again demanding that I am banned for exposing your hoax. I’ve posted the facts and you can’t refute or answer them.
For “uncredible forums” you sure whine enough about being banned from them. Where did I say I “approve” of you being banned on all those forums? When you break the rules, that’s what happens, and those sites got tired of your crap, and they banned you. So quit lying like you always do.
He still hasn’t produced the stat dec I asked for from Bannister to confirm the five bottles of wine extracted from Jimi in casualty. Buster holds Bannister in such high regard getting this shouldn’t be a problem. Buster said he spoke to Kathy and that he knows her but strange that she never mentions him on either her Facebook or Twitter page. In fact she does not believe that Jimi was murdered. Buster rides on the coattails of research already done and then sets about manipulating and distorting what he reads to fit in with what he believes. What made me laugh the most is he asked the opinion of a scientist in Europe to confirm his view that the dosage of the Vesparax Jimi took could not have caused his death in the amount of time that it did. This scientist was not present at the autopsy like Dr. Teare was yet Buster is very willing to believe him at face value just like he is about Bannister’s account suctioning red wine from a six hour dead corpse even though the others doctors said no major procedures were done on Jimi. Dr Seifert was waiting for Gerry Stickells to identify Jimi’s body in order to complete the death certificate; this was the doctor’s only role that morning in attending to Jimi’s body. How willing Buster is to put his faith and trust in Bannister’s account of the events that morning of Jimi being covered in red wine when the autopsy details failed to reveal the presence of any great quantity of red wine as the real cause of Jimi’s death.
Buster/Flyswatter/Scrum Drum/Brian Doyle still repeats his same bogus claims after they have been debunked many many many times. Here comes another time.
BUSTER says: Jason is stupid because the very Wikipedia ‘Death Of Jimi Hendrix’ page he cites has mostly Tony Brown in its foot-noting…Brown was a staunch advocate that Jimi was murdered…Also Jason is a slanderous liar…Nowhere can he cite me being abusive on Wikipedia…That’s because Jason is a troll who is pulling that out of his ass…
JASON says: I don’t cite any page. You were banned from Wikipedia. Liar.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying above and trying to use contrived bullshit to avoid admitting that the half hour written in the Hospital Report under “Treatment Time” is proof 5 bottles of wine was removed from Jimi at St Mary Abbots…Very simply Dr Bannister said they took 20 minutes to suction the wine from Jimi, along with another 10 minutes to ventilate, and there you see that half hour written in stone in the Hospital Report…Jason is in contemptuous trolling denial of this and his lengthy bullshit is his attempt to get around it…Please look at Jason’s response to his evasion of the half hour treatment time…It is just a repeat of the same bullshit he used to avoid the point before…When you deliberately use dishonest reasoning to avoid a point you know you can’t answer that is known in internet vernacular as “trolling”…Nowhere in his response does he ever attempt to address that half hour or explain why the bullshit he wrote serves to get around it…This becomes a failure in moderation problem at this point…The half hour treatment time is real documentation of the wine for the reason that Jason can’t answer it…That makes it documentation…Jimi did have this procedure documented…As Jason already knows, it was documented when they wrote “Unable To Resuscitate” and listed a half hour treatment time that Jason conspicuously can’t answer in public…According to Jason’s demented logic, even though they only treated Jimi for a few minutes, the people who treated him decided to write a half hour for the treatment time on the Hospital Report…
JASON says: I have no idea what is wrong with this guy. He rants like a loon about the same false garbage over and over after It’s been debunked in all his comments.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” -Dr. Martin Siefert
Siefert is telling you no “procedures” were done. What the hell is wrong with you? Why can’t you understand this? No documentation exists about the nonsense you are claiming cuz it never happened. Bannister is a lying fraud cuz he was only an emergency room doctor and had no authorization to be working on a dead body. No wine ever existed on 9/18/70 and there is no documentation of it. This troll can’t produce any documentation. St. Mary Abbots Hospital stated Hendrix died from an overdose on 9/18/70. There was no 5 bottles of wine or “treatments”. You are a fraud.
No surprise that this wine troll changes his fake stories again.
BUSTER says: The doctors saw the vomit outside of Jimi and assumed the wine was part of the same vomit…
JASON says: Pathetic! Worst trolling job ever. Assuming means there was no wine. You just debunked your own phony claim cuz you always said before Jimi was soaked in “pure wine” and so did Fraud Bannister. Now you say vomit haha. This troll has no idea what he wants to claim.
BUSTER says: You would have to be an idiot to take Jason’s desperate excuse-making about the vomit seriously…The doctors saw the vomit outside of Jimi and assumed the wine was part of the same vomit…Jason is a liar because Dr Bannister already made this clear…The wine WAS listed on the Hospital Report when it was described as “Asphyxiated On Vomit Due To Barbiturate Overdose”…So it was documented…Anybody can see Jason is desperately trying to lie his way around it with silly excuses…He’s obviously trying too hard to deny something he knows is true…
JASON says: Buster/Flyswatter/Scrum Drum/Brian Doyle has been saying for a decade that Jimi Hendrix was drowned in “pure wine” and now this troll plays word games trying to claim “vomit means wine” when he has no evidence or documentation of his imaginary wine.
Wine was never documented anywhere for Jimi Hendrix. Suffocating on vomit does not mean wine. That is a result from a drug overdose. This wine Hoaxer has no clue that a “wine drowning would have a totally different reaction.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying because in 1990 Kathy Etchingham did satisfy Jason’s demand for documentation when she got the ambulance men to describe the hard dry plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat…That is the documentation Jason calls for but then tries to get around with crazy word games…Jason is lying because the wine was documented in the Hospital Report when they wrote “Asphyxiated On Vomit Due To Barbiturate Overdose”…That satisfies Jason’s demand for documentation…He is crazy enough to think people will take his trolling demand for precise descriptions of this seriously…But don’t forget Bannister documented it when he reported it to Glebbeek…Scotland Yard’s
disinterest is proof of a cover-up that Jason’s idiotic bullshit won’t get around…
JASON says: The only liar is this fraudulent Hoaxer Buster who still lies about the phony “hard plug of vomit” that never existed. John Saua and and Reginal Jones never said anything about “hard plug of vomit”. Wine was never documented anywhere. No documentation exists in 1970 and this fraud Buster says decades later claims is “documentation”. What a lousy desperate troll. Absolutely hilarious.
Hi Jason. Our friend Buster etc., is so good at playing the blame game and the victim all the while accusing innocent people of a cover up and responsible for a murder while hiding behind pseudonyms and making others believe he is different people. He then has the nerve to call others devious and trolls. Buster etc., foolishly believes he has a following or is taken seriously on any level. His reputation as being a tin foil hatter is well known and this alone excluded him from some sites just by the objectionable things he writes and the derogatory language he uses against people who don’t share his views.
Jason is publicly dodging the points…I was banned from Wikipedia for saying on the “Talk” page (not the main article page) that “It is pretty well known that Michael Jeffery murdered Jimi”…I was banned because they said I violated the “Defamation Of Living Persons” rule…When I protested that Jeffery had been dead since 1973 and was therefore not a living person, so therefore I did not violate the rule, they ignored it and kept the ban…Jason lied…He said I was banned from Wikipedia for abuse…When confronted him on it he gave yet another one of his trollishly incoherent evasions where he failed to answer the point…The bottom line here is Jason is a liar and when asked to back up his accusations he can’t…Also, Jason shows a childish tendency of repeating your words against him right back at you…That’s what 4 year olds do…I’ve seen that method before so we’ll find out Jason is a deviant character from either Bart Kamp’s website or possibly Jim Hawthorn and Crosstown Torrents…In any case Jason is not a serious person attempting credible debate…He’s an internet troll trolling this subject…If we found Jason’s identity you would see that is true…
Jason trollishly tries to force Dr Siefert’s lie that he only worked on Jimi for a few minutes and quit…But once again he ignores the point that was made…Dr Siefert was the head registrar and senior doctor that morning…Therefore he was in charge…So being in charge there is no way he would allow the entry “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15” to be entered on the Hospital Report if Jimi had only been treated for a few minutes…Any rational person who reads Jason’s response will see he is avoiding giving an answer to the half hour treatment time that was written on the Hospital Report…Since Siefert was in charge, and therefore accountable to the documentation Jason is in denial and contempt of, there is no way that he would either enter or allow a half hour treatment time to be entered if that time were only a few minutes…Reality dictates that if you have two doctors and one says a few minutes and the other says a half hour, and the Hospital Report clearly indicates a half hour, that the doctor who said a half hour is telling the truth…Jason trollishly ignores that the statement he is trying to force from Siefert was gotten years later when there were serious political and medical liability issues and Siefert was acting defensively by not volunteering anything…We have proven that Bannister is accurate because the Inquest Report indicated a resuscitation attempt was made…And we have proven the authorities acted like guilty parties by avoiding the nurses…Justin is running an uncredible free for all here of no moderation…If this conversation were taken to a credibly moderated room where Jason was held accountable for his sick trolling we would win a quick decision and Jason would finally be acted upon for his demented input…In Jason’s demented world a Hospital Report that says in plain language a half hour means the doctor who said a few minutes is correct and telling the truth and the doctor who said a half hour is an intolerable liar to be condemned at every opportunity…
Jason is once again evading the points and openly lying about the vomit…Jason is ignoring that Dr Bannister told me in person that they thought the wine they were suctioning from Jimi was wine that was vomited and aspirated…Drowning in wine is not a normal thing so when Siefert and Bannister were rushing to save Jimi and saw vomit covering him they assumed the wine they were removing from Jimi’s lungs was part of that vomit…Jason’s trolling game here depends on concentrating on semantics in order to avoid the more than obvious…Jason is lying when he says there was no documentation of the wine…There was and Dr Bannister explained how…When they entered “Asphyxiated On Vomit” on the Hospital Report the word “vomit” included 5 bottles of wine that were suctioned from Jimi’s lungs and stomach…This is proven by the half hour treatment time listed on the Hospital Report that Jason is in crazy open denial of…Jason is ignoring that Dr Bannister explained that they thought the wine they were removing was part of that vomit and that Jimi had somehow aspirated it…So there you have right there a perfectly reasonable explanation that “Asphyxiated On Vomit” indicates the wine – and therefore documentation of that wine counter to Jason’s trolling lies…The half hour treatment time listed on the Hospital Report then evidences the removal of that wine and proves, of the two doctors, Bannister was the one telling the truth…As Bannister explained in specific detail, suffocating on vomit absolutely does mean wine in this case…
Jason is also hoping his semantic-based evidence shell game hustle distracts you from noticing he is ignoring Dr Siefert’s admission that “Jimi was covered in red wine”…That wine that Siefert detected was wine that spilled over when they were forcing 5 bottles of wine down Jimi’s throat…Jason continues to call out to “Folks” and his imaginary audience in his tent preacher trolling spiel…His attempt to use words to make him the rational voice when anyone can see he is a lying, evidence-evading trolling nut only accents his demented intent…
Jason is a nut who should be booted from the room because he thinks he is getting away with trying to force semantics over the actual evidence…The silly, childish trolling game Jason is playing above is based on demanding that the documentation say in exact wording “We saw a hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat at the Samarkand”…All that is is asinine trolling designed to keep Jason’s trolling mission going…However we have already shown reasonable proof that the ambulance men did say their ambulance equipment was not adequate to penetrate the hard dry vomit in Jimi’s throat and that they failed to get through it…Jason is once again visibly evading giving any direct, honest response to this or how it represents proof that the ambulance men failed to penetrate a hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat…Jason knows we’ve made our case with this, which is why anyone can see he is trying to get around it with trolling semantic word games…It is clear who the troll is and clear who is guilty of the “abuse”…Again, Jason would quickly be banned in any credibly moderated room…Jason is obviously lying against the obvious…He shouldn’t be allowed to do that…
Another useless post from the man of many pseudonyms Buster/Flyswatter/Scrum Drum aka Brian Doyle. He writes in an “authoritative tone” pretending to be an “expert” as he recycles the same garbage over and over repeating the same fantasy stories that have already been debunked. This guy is a fraud and has been exposed perpetrating a hoax. All his phony stories have changed from what they were before and he takes documented testimony and adds his own fake words to it. He uses projection and writes long winded posts of nothing trying to sound knowledgeable. When you look at all his words, they are empty useless contradicting statements bearing no facts at all.
“Buster” aka Brian Doyle is a troll who was banned from Wikipedia and other sites, but uses projection calling others trolls attempting to discredit them. He is a coward who uses intimidation against moderators trying to silence the posters who exposes his hoax.
He knows he has no evidence, so he makes up his own while discrediting the real evidence that refutes him. He has changed almost every single claim he originally made into new ones which debunk his joke of a theory. We all laugh at a clown who lies his way through a phony theory pretending that he is an “expert”.
BUSTER says: Jason knows we’ve made our case with this, which is why anyone can see he is trying to get around it with trolling semantic word games…It is clear who the troll is and clear who is guilty of the “abuse”…Again, Jason would quickly be banned in any credibly moderated room…Jason is obviously lying against the obvious…He shouldn’t be allowed to do that…
JASON says: Buster the projectionist plays word games. He tells us “vomit means wine” when he was claiming a “pure wine” drowning before. He changes all his phony stories with new ones giving them a whole new meaning. We have all his words in public domain where he plays word games and changed his stories. Everybody has already read it many many times. Buster is a wine troll who uses projection and gaslighting to confuse the readers, but when you read into his words, you can easily see he is a fraudulent liar who is a troll like many people say on other forums.
The only one here who has been banned, is you, for trolling and being abusive. You are a pathological liar and a disinformation peddler. I would not be banned anywhere for posting the truth. This clown still whines wanting me to be banned for exposing all his lies. Buster aka Brian Doyle is pathetic liar who peddles a debunked hoax.
BUSTER says: Jason trollishly tries to force Dr Siefert’s lie that he only worked on Jimi for a few minutes and quit…But once again he ignores the point that was made…Dr Siefert was the head registrar and senior doctor that morning…Therefore he was in charge…So being in charge there is no way he would allow the entry “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15” to be entered on the Hospital Report if Jimi had only been treated for a few minutes…
JASON says: We have already read Dr. Siefert’s testimony many times and there was no “treatments” for a 6 hour dead Jimi Hendrix corpse. This fraud keeps peddling this hoax over and over again but can never produce any documentation for the phony “treatments” he claims. Siefert testified that nothing was done but this troll read a book believing it happened instead of what a doctor who tended to Hendrix testified to.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Any sane individual can read Siefert’s testimony and can see no “procedures” were performed on Hendrix. But a hoaxing troll like “Buster” still continues this farce of claiming Hendrix a 6 hour long dead corpse with a black rotting mouth was worked on with “life saving procedures”. Buster belongs in a straight jacket with his fraud doctor Bannister.
BUSTER says: Any rational person who reads Jason’s response will see he is avoiding giving an answer to the half hour treatment time that was written on the Hospital Report…Since Siefert was in charge, and therefore accountable to the documentation Jason is in denial and contempt of, there is no way that he would either enter or allow a half hour treatment time to be entered if that time were only a few minutes…
JASON says: Produce these St Mary Abbots Hendrix medical documents that shows a “wine removal”, a “hard plug of vomit removal”, Hendrix “covered in wine”, the entry and exit time he was brought into the operation room to have these procedures, and the full report on the entire procedures being passed on to Dr Teare for the autopsy. All of this would be fully documented If it happened. Where are all these reports? Post them for us. They would all be there if what you claim is true. No excuses either. Post your evidence chump. No backpeadling now either.
BUSTER says: Reality dictates that if you have two doctors and one says a few minutes and the other says a half hour, and the Hospital Report clearly indicates a half hour, that the doctor who said a half hour is telling the truth…Jason trollishly ignores that the statement he is trying to force from Siefert was gotten years later when there were serious political and medical liability issues and Siefert was acting defensively by not volunteering anything…
JASON says: Another phony story from this troll claiming Siefert was “gotten to”. Same old playbook from this joker. When medical professionals refute his bullshit, this troll claims a “cover up” and they were “gotten to”. Well, when you have no evidence like this clown doesn’t, that’s all he can say. Pathetic and hilarious.
BUSTER says: We have proven that Bannister is accurate because the Inquest Report indicated a resuscitation attempt was made…And we have proven the authorities acted like guilty parties by avoiding the nurses…Justin is running an uncredible free for all here of no moderation…If this conversation were taken to a credibly moderated room where Jason was held accountable for his sick trolling we would win a quick decision and Jason would finally be acted upon for his demented input…In Jason’s demented world a Hospital Report that says in plain language a half hour means the doctor who said a few minutes is correct and telling the truth and the doctor who said a half hour is an intolerable liar to be condemned at every opportunity…
JASON says: You haven’t proven anything. Doctor Bannister is a convicted fraud who lost his medical license for fraud and medical malpractice in 1992. Bannister has invented and made up this whole wine hoax. That’s why he is known as ‘The Grandfather of Wine”. He has no evidence for any of his bogus claims and this troll “Buster” runs with his lies as facts. A total joke and a farce. No evidence can these jokers ever produce for their phony claims.
“Buster” still whines about no “moderation” when he has been banned by many moderators in various forums. Another phony story he writes, but again, no evidence he can ever produce for what he claims. It’s just a bunch of long winded words of nothing. He is a hoaxer and a troll running a debunked scam.
Buster the hoaxer is at it again, playing his word games telling us “vomit means wine” and changing his whole phony theory all over again. “Buster” is just a clownish troll that we all laugh at who is not a serious poster.
BUSTER says: Jason is once again evading the points and openly lying about the vomit…
JASON says: Buster is a pathological liar who now claims “vomit means wine” after he told us for years of a “pure wine drowning”. After I exposed this fraud, he changes his story to vomit. That’s what you call a troll.
BUSTER says: Jason is ignoring that Dr Bannister told me in person that they thought the wine they were suctioning from Jimi was wine that was vomited and aspirated…
JASON says: Ex Doctor Bannister is a fraudulent liar just like you are now changing your fake story. Bannister is never on the official record making these claims. He always talked about “pure wine” and now you are changing the story to vomit cuz you are a fraud. No “wine suctioning” is ever documented on Hendrix’s medical record. This fake story is a hoax.
BUSTER says: Drowning in wine is not a normal thing so when Siefert and Bannister were rushing to save Jimi and saw vomit covering him they assumed the wine they were removing from Jimi’s lungs was part of that vomit…
JASON says: Jimi was unable to be saved since he was already dead for 6 hours. There was no “wine” or “procedures” done since he was a dead stiff corpse. You are a fraud and a pathological liar.
Here we go everybody. This lying fraud “Buster” changes his story from “Jimi being covered in wine” to “Jimi being covered in vomit which still means wine”. This troll has managed to change his entire phony wine theory. Hilarious!
BUSTER says: Jason’s trolling game here depends on concentrating on semantics in order to avoid the more than obvious…Jason is lying when he says there was no documentation of the wine…There was and Dr Bannister explained how…When they entered “Asphyxiated On Vomit” on the Hospital Report the word “vomit” included 5 bottles of wine that were suctioned from Jimi’s lungs and stomach…This is proven by the half hour treatment time listed on the Hospital Report that Jason is in crazy open denial of…Jason is ignoring that Dr Bannister explained that they thought the wine they were removing was part of that vomit and that Jimi had somehow aspirated it…So there you have right there a perfectly reasonable explanation that “Asphyxiated On Vomit” indicates the wine – and therefore documentation of that wine counter to Jason’s trolling lies…The half hour treatment time listed on the Hospital Report then evidences the removal of that wine and proves, of the two doctors, Bannister was the one telling the truth…As Bannister explained in specific detail, suffocating on vomit absolutely does mean wine in this case…
JASON says: Another bogus story change from this troll. No documentation exists of 5 bottles of wine. No documentation exists of “wine suctioning” on Hendrix’s medical record. No wine was ever forensically analyzed by Dr. Teare in the autopsy. A 6 hour long dead corpse doesn’t get “treatments”. Siefert already testified that nothing was done for Hendrix. Nothing about wine is ever documented in Hendrix’s medical report. But this fraudulent troll is now trying to claim “vomit means wine” with his word games. This hoaxing troll can never produce any evidence for his phony claims. Just a bunch of long winded lying words. You are a clown and we all laugh at you for being desperate and pathetic. You’ve managed to change your whole phony theory.
BUSTER says: Jason is also hoping his semantic-based evidence shell game hustle distracts you from noticing he is ignoring Dr Siefert’s admission that “Jimi was covered in red wine”…That wine that Siefert detected was wine that spilled over when they were forcing 5 bottles of wine down Jimi’s throat…Jason continues to call out to “Folks” and his imaginary audience in his tent preacher trolling spiel…His attempt to use words to make him the rational voice when anyone can see he is a lying, evidence-evading trolling nut only accents his demented intent…
JASON says: Another narration from this troll. No documented medical record ever states Hendrix “was covered in wine” cuz now you are claiming he was “covered in vomit” you troll. No documentation exists of wine in Jimi’s throat you troll. More bogus nonsense and this troll can never produce any evidence for his phony claims except for his nonsensical rambling words. A total clown.
BUSTER says: Jason is a nut who should be booted from the room because he thinks he is getting away with trying to force semantics over the actual evidence…The silly, childish trolling game Jason is playing above is based on demanding that the documentation say in exact wording “We saw a hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat at the Samarkand”…All that is is asinine trolling designed to keep Jason’s trolling mission going…However we have already shown reasonable proof that the ambulance men did say their ambulance equipment was not adequate to penetrate the hard dry vomit in Jimi’s throat and that they failed to get through it…Jason is once again visibly evading giving any direct, honest response to this or how it represents proof that the ambulance men failed to penetrate a hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat…Jason knows we’ve made our case with this, which is why anyone can see he is trying to get around it with trolling semantic word games…It is clear who the troll is and clear who is guilty of the “abuse”…Again, Jason would quickly be banned in any credibly moderated room…Jason is obviously lying against the obvious…He shouldn’t be allowed to do that…
JASON says: “Buster” the fraud has been booted from many sites for trolling like this and for his abusive posts. He is a troll. His hoax has been exposed, so now he whines and writes pathetic posts like this bullying the site owner.
This joker has nothing, so he changes his fake theories claiming “vomit means wine” so this clown can “win” a “debate”.
It’s very clear that “Buster” doesn’t care about Jimi Hendrix, the truth about his death, or any of the real evidence. All he wants to do is “debate” and use whatever means possible to make bogus claims. That is what you call a troll and why he’s already been banned for doing it.
Hi Jason. The hard plug of vomit means that Jimi tried to throw up solid matter and not liquid like wine. The ambulance officers both said Jimi was covered in black and brown vomit. If there was any wine present then this would have been completely different in appearance and consistency from the vomit. I’m assuming the Vesparax caused Jimi to vomit immediately but because the pills were so potent they knocked him out then and there giving him no time to undress and get into bed. Jimi was then unable to throw up because the pills rendered him unconscious and the vomit flowed back into his system drying up in the hours before the ambulance was called. The dry wine would have been red in colour or at the most a dark red not black and brown like was witnessed. A 6 hour long dead corpse could never produce 5 bottles of red wine. The reason Dr. Teare was able to identify the cause of death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication was because there was no work done on Jimi in casualty that morning. The suctioning of the wine supposedly done by Dr. Bannister would have also washed out any trace of the vomit.
Jason once again uses his dirty tricks to misrepresent the evidence…I already spelled-out and described the situation in which I was banned…Jason ignores it and once again validates the people doing the banning as if they were credible authorities and gives them automatic credibility…Like most of what he posts Jason is full of it and pulling that out of his ass…The 3 people who banned me from Crosstown Torrents and Electric Guru were Gordon Johnson, Robert Nilo, and Cindy Garcia…Jason gives them automatic authority and credibility but the truth is I was banned because I wasn’t dumb enough and I refused to obey their dictating censorship on the murder subject to satisfy their dumb-down needs…They banned me because I was out-arguing their lying friends just like I am out-arguing Jason here…As usual Jason is just using that for trolling purposes and pulling it out of his ass…If you asked him to explain why I was banned he couldn’t do it…In Jason’s moronic world being banned automatically makes the victim wrong and the banners right…Jason, being a servant of Satan, once again attacks the victim in favor of the violators…
I don’t know who Jason thinks he’s addressing?…His language makes it seem like he thinks he’s addressing some public body that is watching this debate…I assure you no one is watching this debate and if they were most people would think Jason was an obnoxious trolling asshole who was obviously making up excuses around evidence he doesn’t want to admit…When you nail Jason on the evidence he responds with another full volley of incoherent bullshit…His claim that once you claim pure wine you can’t claim vomit is nuts…You would have to be crazy to say that in public…All that is is intentional asinine goobledigook designed to frustrate any intelligent debate with nuttery designed to gum up the works…In no way does the pure wine that was poured down Jimi’s throat conflict with the wine that was in the vomit…You would have to be nuts to make that claim…So all we have there is Jason being trollishly and idiotically unable to answer yet another point and being allowed to get away with it by Justin…Jason is an asshole who is trolling trash-talk in order to get attention for his Hendrix murder denial trolling…Justin calls that “free speech”…
Jason accuses me of being some wannabe who “read a book”…I was actually in the process of trying to interview Siefert when his secretary said he was ill…I thought she was blowing me off but about a year later Siefert died of cancer…Jason is a slandering shit who is projecting his own position on to me…The person who did get to him for an interview got Siefert to say “Jimi was covered in red wine”…If you look at Jason’s responses he never honestly answers that every time it is posted…
Jason is trolling here so he has shifted the goal posts by creating a strawman that the Hospital Report must contain, in exact wording, that there was a hard plug of vomit, 20 minute removal of the wine from the lungs and stomach, Jimi being soaked in wine, as well as the half hour treatment time…Jason is doing this in order to create his own strawman that must be met perfectly, according to his demands, or the whole deal is off…What kind of an asshole thinks he’s getting away with such a stupid trick in public and thinks that the public doesn’t see him as the obnoxious troll he is?…Seriously…Anyone who reads this can see Jason is full of shit and, once trapped by the evidence, continues to offer these crazy counters as if they were sincere…Anyone reading this can see the only reason Jason is doing this is because he knows damned well that the half hour on the Hospital Report, along with “Unable To Resuscitate”, when combined with “Asphyxiated On Vomit Due To Barbiturate Overdose” IS that documentation and does cover all the things he asks for…It is important to remember that Jason is trying to lull you in to accepting his trolling as a serious challenge and therefore his destruction of Bannister and his reputation as credible…However any intelligent person with any healthy sense of reality will realize Jason is just a trolling piece of shit who only exists because the internet gives him access…Dr Bannister is a gentleman and credible doctor who was there and witnessed these things first hand…I mean Jason is an obvious asshole just from what he writes…So the fact he thinks he’s getting away with convincing the public his word is good and Bannister’s isn’t is an insult to most people’s intelligence and as soon as we identify this trolling piece of shit and get him in to a venue where he is held responsible for what he types this problem will be quickly resolved…Jason is divorced from reality…He deludes himself that if we put him next to Bannister and had him make those accusations to his face we wouldn’t quickly see who was credible and who wasn’t…I suspect Jason is either John Iacoletti or Bart Kamp…Those are two sick fuckers who post the kind of crazy shit you see Jason post here…
Anyway – Jason needs to answer why John Platt wrote in Mitch Mitchell’s book that Jimi was treated for a half hour from 11:45 to 12:15 and where Platt got that from?…Platt was English and had access to the St Mary Abotts records…So Jason, where did Platt get that from?…Jason knows as well as we do that the Hospital Report lists a Treatment Time from 11:45 to 12:15…
By the way – Flyswatter is not me under an alias…Justin can confirm that from the sign-in e-mail addresses…Any intelligent person could see that in the posting styles…
Hey Buster….
You notice Jason continually talking this dumb shit about “no documentation for wine”.
That’s a lie.
Jack Meehan first documented it on Sept. 29, 1970 when Dr. Thurston told Meehan that “a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed” regarding Jimi’s stomach contents.
Dr. Teare made reference to it in his autopsy report when he made his 100mg BAC ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion.
Dr. Brown made reference to it when he stated that Jimi had “a bit too much to drink”.
Dr. Seifert was caught on video saying Jimi was covered in red wine.
And of course, it’s well known what Dr. Bannister said about it.
Where is Jason’s reference sources stating there was “no wine”, using those exact words? Nowhere, as they do not exist. There is no documentation that uses the exact wording of “no wine”.
Those are Jason’s words & just another self-decreed fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass.
Jason can’t claim his “no wine” hoax without any documentation stating that using those exact words & there none to be found anywhere
Same with Jason’s repeated “no treatments were done” blather. There is no documentation anywhere stating that “no treatments were done”, and Jason blatantly lies when he says Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown are saying that “no treatments were done”, as they never stated any such thing. Jason is just ripping things out of context & trying to put words in the mouths of Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown.
Jason has no documentation anywhere that states “no wine” or “no treatments were done” using those exact words, so both of Jason’s hoaxes have been flushed down the toilet & we know that Jason’s brain has been flushed down the toilet, as well.
So in a nutshell, Jason doesn’t have any documentation supporting his “no wine” or “no treatment done” hoaxes. Jason has no documentation that uses those exact words. All Jason has to back up his lies of “no wine” and “no treatment done”, is more of Jason’s own lies.
And that right there flushes his hoaxes down toilet and renders his argument VOID.
BTW, when Jason uses the phrase “we are all laughing”, well ,who is “we”, and how is anybody else supposed to know that this lying-denying pigbreeder (Jason) is expecting to give birth to a litter of piglets?
This wine troll is claiming wine and has no documentation of it and never will. LMAO
“Buster” has been banned from various forums and sites for trolling and abusive posts like he does here. But he continues to lie since he is a pathological liar.
“Buster” has no evidence. It’s all made up garbage he makes up or reads in a book and believes it’s real. He is a nut.
“Buster” moves the goal posts as far as the eye can see. We all have read his phony claims and how he changes them each time. He started with “pure wine” and now he says “vomit is wine”. Buster has moved his goal posts all the way around the world by now. He is a fraud.
Siefert never stated any “treatments” were done on Jimi. What needs to be done for a dead 6 hour corpse? No hospital does weird medical procedures on a dead 6 hour corpse awaiting an autopsy. Call up any hospital in London. They will tell you they don’t.
Where is all the massive wine at? Oh yeah, “Buster” now says It’s disguised as vomit as he moved his goal posts again. His pal Fraud Bannister never stated that on the official record.
Who would believe an ex Doctor Bannister who was convicted for 3 counts of fraud including medical malpractice in 1992 when he first made his phony wine claims? Anyone? No sane person would. His stories are more phony than a 3 dollar bill.
Fraud Bannister made up lies about wine starting in 1992 and is “The Grandfather of Wine”. “Buster” tells us Fraud Bannister illegally removed bodily fluids from Jimi Hendrix and casually dumped it down the drain. This is criminal destroying the pending results of an autopsy. And Buster the clown thinks this is great. It never happened anyway since it is a hoax.
Bannister is a convicted 3 count fraud. His word is no good. Neither is Buster’s who gets banned from various forums for telling these lies.
Buster tries to claim wine is vomit again. Totally ridiculous.
Buster cites another book and it’s inaccurate content but ignores the testimony of the head doctor who refutes it. Just another pathetic attempt to keep his debunked hoax alive in his delusional mind.
Buster is a “wannabe” researcher who takes bad information from books and calls himself an “expert”.
Buster’s main hero is Sharon Lawrence who wrote in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by swallowing 9 pills since he was obsessed with the number 9 and with the occult. Do you believe Sharon Lawrence Buster the clown?
Buster is no friend of Jimi Hendrix. He lies and makes up fake stories wanting him to be “murdered” instead of how he actually died from a drug overdose. Yes, Buster is the sick individual and he should be ashamed of how he behaves.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder (Jason) that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 8, 2019 at 4:47 pm
Here’s another lie from “Buster” aka Brian Doyle who trolls the real evidence with his phony “Hendrix murder claims”. He is refuted by Reuters from 10/4/70 when Janis Joplin died.”
Reuters? You gotta be kidding !! If Jason is stupid enough to accept Reuters analysis of Janis Joplin’s death as factual, without first looking at Janis’ actual autopsy, then that shows everybody that Jason has got the brain of a piss-ant.
Try looking at Janis’ actual autopsy report, STUPID !!
Anybody can go to Google and type in the words “Janis Joplin Autopsy” and click the PDF link to see Janis’ actual autopsy report & they will clearly see that it states the opposite of what Reuters is saying, and backs Buster’s comment below:
“BUSTER says: Janis was dead for 14 hours before she was taken in and her report indicated she wasn’t stiff…”
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder (Jason) that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 8, 2019 at 4:47 pm
October 5, 1970
“Janis Joplin Dies; Rock Star Was 27”
By REUTERS:
HOLLYWOOD, Oct. 4 — Janis Joplin, the rock singer, was found dead in her Hollywood apartment tonight. She was 27 years old.
The cause of death was not immediately determined, but the police said she apparently died of an overdose of drugs. They said she had been dead for about two hours when she was found shortly after 10 P.M.”
This is absolute BULLSHIT !! NOWHERE in that 10 page autopsy report do the police say that Janis had been dead for 2 hours. Where the hell is Reuters getting this information from?
Page 7 of Janis Joplin’s autopsy states that a liver temperature reading was taken at 11:00PM on Oct 4, 1970 and it read 80 degrees Fahrenheit. Everybody knows that the average body temperature is 98.6 degrees fahrenheit.
There are varied reports that state that the liver temperature drop can vary between .75 degrees and 1.5 degrees fahrenheit per hour, depending on the environment temperature. Page 7 of Janis Joplin’s autopsy report states the environment temperature was 74 degrees fahrenheit, when she was found dead in her hotel room. If this temperature drop were 1.5 degrees fahrenheit per hour, from 98.6 down to 80 degrees fahrenheit (simply by taking 18.6 and dividing it by 1.5), then this tells us that poor Janis had been dead for at least 12 hours.
And Janis’ autopsy report clearly states on page 7 and page 10 that there was “no rigor mortis detected”. So Buster is correct.
And that proves the Reuters report to be completely FALSE.
JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder (Jason) that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 8, 2019 at 4:47 pm:
“Buster” is clearly refuted again by documented evidence. Reuters says that Joplin was dead for about two hours when she was found dead. Not 14 like “Buster” aka Brian Doyle pathetically lied about. Does this clown still think he won’t be fact checked and proved to be the pathological liar that he is?”
And once again the clown suit gets put on Jason, by none other than Jason. The so-called Reuters “documentation”, along with Jason, gets refuted by Janis’ actual autopsy report and shows both Reuters and Jason to be completely clueless.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder (Jason) that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 8, 2019 at 4:47 pm:
Janis Joplin was found dead 4 hours less than Jimi Hendrix was and she didn’t get no “treatments” performed on her.”
Guess again, dipshit. Page 7 of Janis’ autopsy report shows a graph with lividity of 4+ in the shaded areas, indicating that Janis had been dead for way longer than 2 hours. No such signs were seen when Jimi Hendrix arrived at St. Mary Abbots.
And Janis didn’t have anything blocking her airways. Janis death was treated as if she had taken a gunshot wound to the head, just by the external signs of lividity. That’s why Janis didn’t get any treatment, asshole.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder (Jason) that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 8, 2019 at 4:47 pm:
Jimi Hendrix was dead four hours longer which means his body would be in worse condition and no “procedures” were ever performed since he was a stiff corpse with a black rotting mouth. Hendrix was a drug overdose as well that was correctly reported two weeks earlier.”
Wrong again. Janis’ autopsy proves this to be false. Janis was dead way longer than Jimi was. Jimi’s condition was noticed during the half-hour treatment time when the medical team tried to resuscitate him.
Jimi’s autopsy doesn’t state that he died of a drug overdose.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder (Jason) that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 8, 2019 at 4:47 pm:
Janis Joplin was found dead for two hours and had no “half hour resuscitation attempts” cuz she was already dead.
Jimi Hendrix was dead for 4 hours longer than Janis Joplin which proves no “procedures” were performed just like Dr. Martin Siefert and Dr. Bob Brown are documented as saying since Hendrix was already dead and nothing could be done for him.”
Jason is being his usual blatant liar self & just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality. There is no documentation regarding Dr. Seifert and Dr, Brown stating “no treatment” was done. Neither doctor implies any such thing — they only imply that Jimi couldn’t be saved & they imply this way after the fact. Just another self-decreed fabrication that Jason is pulling out of his ass.
Dr. Seifert says: “After we worked on Jimi – we didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix until later on – I remember just a vague memory of a bit of fuss going on in admissions, but it could have been anything, it was a casualty ward.”
Notice the words “After we worked on Jimi”? And yet we have Jason claiming that Seifert is saying that “no treatment was done” & Jason obviously omitting that part of Seifert’s statement, because Seifert is telling us that they did work on Jimi. And the hospital report that has “Time of Treatment: 11:45AM to 12:15PM”, written on it that was most likely written by the Medical Registrar — none other than Dr. Seifert.
If there were “no treatment done”, as Jason keeps trying to delude himself with this self-decreed fabrication pulled out of his ass, then Seifert never uses those words “After we worked on Jimi”. Seifert clearly states that they did work on Jimi.
Jason doesn’t have any documentation supporting his “no wine” or “no treatment done” hoaxes. Jason has no documentation that uses those exact words. All Jason has to back up his lies of “no wine” and “no treatment done”, is more of Jason’s own lies.
And that automatically renders Jason’s phony hoaxes VOID.
“Buster” is posting with his alias “Flyswatter” name playing word games and discrediting documented testimony and evidence with his phony claims.
Still no evidence or medical documents from this wine troll.
Hilarious.
Buster”, the man of many pseudonyms has a real hard time deciding on which phony claim he wants to make. He has no idea if he wants to claim a “wine soaked Jimi” or a “vomit means wine” Jimi. He also easily switches between a “forced wine Jimi” and a “non forced wine” Jimi. Then “Buster” amuses the readers by inventing his own phony stories based on “probably’s” that never happened. An entire fake episode “Buster” concots in his crazy head and tells us it’s “good evidence”. That’s why we all laugh at “Buster the clown” for providing us pure comedy gold.
BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
BUSTER says: November 9, 2019
That wine that Siefert detected was wine that spilled over when they were forcing 5 bottles of wine down Jimi’s throat…
JASON says: “Buster” once again switches between “no one would need to force wine into Jimi” and “wine forced down Jimi’s throat” with ease. He uses both fake claims when it suits him so he can “win” a “debate” based on an account that never happened. So, Buster the clown will always lose the “debate” since there never was any wine. But this fraud changes his fake stories every chance he gets. This is why we know “Buster” is perpetrating a hoax cuz he always changes his fake stories.
So, “Buster” was wine “forced” or “not forced” into Jimi. Which is it? You can’t have both ways.
Remember folks, there never was any wine. This is all a hoax.
Buster” the man of many pseudonyms, also makes up fantasy scenarios for his hoax and calls that his “good evidence”. Here is another example of how “Buster” makes up fake stories in his crazy head that never happened and pretends it did to feed his delusion of “wine” and a phony “Hendrix murder”.
BUSTER says: What is becoming clear here is Monika was involved and probably let the murderers in.
BUSTER says: So they probably waited until the pills took effect and then came in to pour the wine down Jimi’s throat when he couldn’t resist.
JASON says: “Buster” now involves Monika and “unknown murderers” to his wacky “murder plot”.
Before, “Buster” had Jeffery doing the job, but now for his new sequel, he gives he honors to Monika and “unknown individuals” that he refuses to name. A real treat for all the readers!
Notice how “Buster” adds “probably” in each fake scenario, so even he knows this is all a crock of shit.
“Buster” ruins the story of Tappy Wright’s phony claim of Michael Jeffery killing Hendrix. Tappy never had Monika being involved letting “murderers” in. Tappy also never had pills taking effect first. Tappy had Jeffery stuffing pills into Jimi’s mouth and pouring wine. So, “Buster” bastardized Tappy’s fake version and gave us his own fake ridiculous version that is automatically debunked since it is made up and never happened.
There is only one fake and original version and that belongs to Tappy Wright. Buster the clown is stuck with Tappy’s version and can’t make up his own fake version.
“Buster” is a troll who makes up fake stories to push his fake “Hendrix Murder Hoax”. This is another fine example with this ridiculous bogus story “Buster” made up. We all just sit back and laugh at a clown.
Imagine spendings years of your life trying to convince people of a murder that never took place and using various pseudonyms to make it look as if you have support and then being banned from various sites for your objectionable opinions. The authorities uncovered nothing suspicious in Jimi’s death as it looked exactly like any other overdose they witnessed. The fake story of Jimi being waterboarded to death was concocted by Wright and discredited years ago but Buster etc., still clings to it.
It’s probably a mistake to feed Jason’s trolling at this point…I’m satisfied that most people would look at Jason’s demented content and not take him seriously, so I can rest assured he has had no effect on the public’s judgment on this…Jason is just a troll who hasn’t been banned by Justin and I blame Justin for allowing this sick desecration of a serious subject by an obviously ill mind…
We know Jason is a mentally ill nut so what he says isn’t taken seriously, however in case anyone takes his smearing of Dr Bannister seriously, Bannister went on to form a very successful medical consultation business and made millions…He had no such fraud or criminal misconduct charges in that career…Bannister was railroaded in order to discredit him because he bore witness to a political assassination overseen by governments…Siefert lied and covered-up so he had no problem…Some doctors looked at the billing fraud that Bannister lost his license over and said if it were applied evenly almost all doctors would be struck-off…
If you look at Jason’s idiotic high school boy trolling above he’s entering asinine arguments that are merely meant to screw up the debate…He’s just a noise-making troll so I think I’ve done my job…Shame on Justin for letting him do that and destroy what was a good comments section up to now…Jason has gotten the attention he seeks so it is probably time to stop answering him…
In any case anyone can see from Jason’s answers that he is desperately avoiding acknowledging that we have proven the wine by Siefert’s statement that “Jimi was covered in red wine”…Jason deludes himself that his inability to answer this doesn’t show that the rest of his bullshit that he uses to get around it is already disproven by Siefert’s reference to the wine that Jason can’t admit…Obviously if Siefert said Jimi was covered in wine then that is corroboration of Bannister…Jason is trying to make this go away by ignoring it and trolling around it, but it isn’t going away and it proves the wine Jason was asking for but then stupidly denied when shown…Also, the Chief Coroner Gavin Thurston said Jimi’s stomach was full of red wine…That’s also not going away…
If you read all the boyish, trolling responses Jason gave he never made any attempt to answer for the half hour treatment time on the Hospital Report:
” Anyway – Jason needs to answer why John Platt wrote in Mitch Mitchell’s book that Jimi was treated for a half hour from 11:45 to 12:15 and where Platt got that from?…Platt was English and had access to the St Mary Abbots records…So Jason, where did Platt get that from?…Jason knows as well as we do that the Hospital Report lists a Treatment Time from 11:45 to 12:15… ”
Jason knows he is beaten by this so he offers the feeble-minded, haire-brained response:
” Buster cites another book and it’s inaccurate content but ignores the testimony of the head doctor who refutes it. Just another pathetic attempt to keep his debunked hoax alive in his delusional mind. ”
This kind of pathetic, weaseling response bespeaks a silly troll who is caught and can’t answer a simple direct question that he knows disproves him…The truth is, being head registrar, Siefert had to have read and signed-off on the Hospital Report and its contents…So Siefert read the half hour treatment time and confirmed it…It is pretty obvious from Jason’s idiotic evasion that he knows this is true and that’s why he can’t give it a straight answer…The answer is Platt got it from the Hospital Report and that means the half hour backs and confirms Bannister and disproves Siefert, as the nurses would have confirmed…Monika also said Jimi was treated for a long time…
Because Jason tries to control the narrative with his trolling he is getting away with avoiding that if Siefert witnessed wine soaking Jimi that means it was spilled in the act of forcing it down his throat, which in turn proves he was drowned in the 5 bottles of wine Dr Bannister spoke of…Evidence of homicide was criminally avoided when the murder happened, as well as afterwards when Kathy Etchingham tried to get the case re-opened…That evidence is now being trolled by Jason who I hope is held accountable for his attacking of a horrifically victimized person in history…
Where did Platt get that from Jason?…
Another pathetic display from “Buster but again he can blow hot air but never can produce any evidence for his phony claims.
BUSTER says: It’s probably a mistake to feed Jason’s trolling at this point…I’m satisfied that most people would look at Jason’s demented content and not take him seriously, so I can rest assured he has had no effect on the public’s judgment on this…Jason is just a troll who hasn’t been banned by Justin and I blame Justin for allowing this sick desecration of a serious subject by an obviously ill mind…
JASON says: The only mentally ill troll here is you. You keep pushing this fake “Hendrix Murder Hoax” making up your own fake stories and claims.
You’ve been banned from many sites and forums for your phony claims and abusive posts. Only a mentally ill person such as yourself would make the asinine claim that Jimi Hendrix would still be breathing from fake “treatments” after being a dead 6 hour rotting corpse.
And you continue to bully the site owner Justin which is pathetic. You keep showing you’re a coward who can’t produce any evidence for the fake claims you make.
BUSTER says: We know Jason is a mentally ill nut so what he says isn’t taken seriously, however in case anyone takes his smearing of Dr Bannister seriously, Bannister went on to form a very successful medical consultation business and made millions…He had no such fraud or criminal misconduct charges in that career…Bannister was railroaded in order to discredit him because he bore witness to a political assassination overseen by governments…Siefert lied and covered-up so he had no problem…Some doctors looked at the billing fraud that Bannister lost his license over and said if it were applied evenly almost all doctors would be struck-off…
JASON says: More projection from this wine clown who can’t produce a single shred of evidence after 10 long years to prove his phony claims. Hang up your spurs Cowboy. You’ve got nothin’ and you never will.
Bannister is a 3 count convicted fraud who lost his medical license and that counts for his credibility and why he has no evidence for the phony claims he makes. Bannister was also sued for medical malpractice which is why he made up the fake wine claims so he wouldn’t get sued again after he read Electric Gypsy.
BUSTER says: If you look at Jason’s idiotic high school boy trolling above he’s entering asinine arguments that are merely meant to screw up the debate…He’s just a noise-making troll so I think I’ve done my job…Shame on Justin for letting him do that and destroy what was a good comments section up to now…Jason has gotten the attention he seeks so it is probably time to stop answering him…
JASON says: Shame on you for perpetrating a hoax and attacking the site owner Buster the clown. The only troll is you, who was banned from wikipedia, amazon, and many Hendrix sites for trolling and abuse.
What job have you done? You haven’t produced one single shred of evidence to prove your phony claims.
So, Buster the coward bows out since he was clearly defeated and he attacks the site owner cuz he’s outraged the real evidence wasn’t suppressed. Pathetic!
BUSTER says: In any case anyone can see from Jason’s answers that he is desperately avoiding acknowledging that we have proven the wine by Siefert’s statement that “Jimi was covered in red wine”…Jason deludes himself that his inability to answer this doesn’t show that the rest of his bullshit that he uses to get around it is already disproven by Siefert’s reference to the wine that Jason can’t admit…Obviously if Siefert said Jimi was covered in wine then that is corroboration of Bannister…Jason is trying to make this go away by ignoring it and trolling around it, but it isn’t going away and it proves the wine Jason was asking for but then stupidly denied when shown…Also, the Chief Coroner Gavin Thurston said Jimi’s stomach was full of red wine…That’s also not going away…
JASON says: This is totally pathetic. It’s the job of Buster the clown to produce documentation for the phony claims he makes but he never can provide any cuz none ever exists. Instead, he wants to whine, blow smoke, and post phony claims for his phony “debate”.
There is no documentation that “Jimi was covered in wine” so that means it never happened. If he was there would be a detailed report about it and it would have been released and told to the public in 1970.
Here’s another blatant lie by this wine troll. Dr. Gavin Thurston never said anything about “Jimi’s stomach was full of red wine”. Nothing is ever documented. This is a fake second hand quote from Sharon Lawrence’s 2001 fiction book. I’ve already debunked this many times and this troll keeps repeating it. He has no documentation to prove this since none exists. Thurston said Jimi died from a barbiturate overdose. Not one word about wine. Another phony claim with no evidence.
BUSTER says: If you read all the boyish, trolling responses Jason gave he never made any attempt to answer for the half hour treatment time on the Hospital Report:
JASON says: There were no “treatments”.and I answer this b.s. in almost every post by this troll.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead”- Dr. Martin Siefert.
Dr. Siefert is telling this troll that there were no “treatments” cuz Jimi was dead. Buster is a mentally ill moron who thinks a 6 hour dead rotting corpse can get “30 minute treatments” and can breathe again.
BUSTER says: ” Anyway – Jason needs to answer why John Platt wrote in Mitch Mitchell’s book that Jimi was treated for a half hour from 11:45 to 12:15 and where Platt got that from?…Platt was English and had access to the St Mary Abbots records…So Jason, where did Platt get that from?…Jason knows as well as we do that the Hospital Report lists a Treatment Time from 11:45 to 12:15… ”
JASON says: Why can’t you produce any evidence for this phony clam since you say it happened? This information would have been already been documented and released if it happened. Buster the clown has no answer for that. All he can whine is there are “cover ups”.
BUSTER says: Jason knows he is beaten by this so he offers the feeble-minded, haire-brained response:
JASON says: LMAO. You’ve been beaten since day one when you could nevr produce any documented evidence for your phony claims.
BUSTER says: ” Buster cites another book and it’s inaccurate content but ignores the testimony of the head doctor who refutes it. Just another pathetic attempt to keep his debunked hoax alive in his delusional mind. ”
This kind of pathetic, weaseling response bespeaks a silly troll who is caught and can’t answer a simple direct question that he knows disproves him…The truth is, being head registrar, Siefert had to have read and signed-off on the Hospital Report and its contents…So Siefert read the half hour treatment time and confirmed it…It is pretty obvious from Jason’s idiotic evasion that he knows this is true and that’s why he can’t give it a straight answer…The answer is Platt got it from the Hospital Report and that means the half hour backs and confirms Bannister and disproves Siefert, as the nurses would have confirmed…Monika also said Jimi was treated for a long time…
JASON says: Yet Buster the clown still can’t produce any evidence for the phony claims he makes. It is up to you to produce it and you’ve failed miserably.
BUSTER says: ecause Jason tries to control the narrative with his trolling he is getting away with avoiding that if Siefert witnessed wine soaking Jimi that means it was spilled in the act of forcing it down his throat, which in turn proves he was drowned in the 5 bottles of wine Dr Bannister spoke of…Evidence of homicide was criminally avoided when the murder happened, as well as afterwards when Kathy Etchingham tried to get the case re-opened…That evidence is now being trolled by Jason who I hope is held accountable for his attacking of a horrifically victimized person in history…
JASON says: More phony commentary from this joker. But where is the documented evidence for your claims? 10 years and counting and still…..nothin’
Hi Jason. Have you heard the latest conspiracy theory that the actor Morgan Freeman is actually Jimi Hendrix. They just keep getting weirder by the minute. LOL
Hi Ivana,
Yeah I heard that one and had a good laugh. New crazy conspiracies are made up all the time like “Buster” does in each post. LOL.
I see the wine hoaxer “Buster” still hasn’t produced any evidence for his phony claims of a “wine removal” but always demands that we answer his own made up conspiracies. His latest post is full of useless nonsense as usual and no evidence.
Wouldn’t you think a self proclaimed “expert” could produce these medical documents of a “wine removal” after he’s been saying for a decade that it happened?
Jason is obviously struggling to give a simple straight answer to “Where did Platt get the Treatment Time of 11:45 to 12:15?”…
Any asshole can laugh and mock but where it counts the most Jason is noticeably unable to give any answer to where did Platt get that exact half hour that Bannister told of in his 11:45 to 12:15 treatment time entered in Mitch Mitchell’s book?…
We’re still waiting for Jason to back up his blustering bullshit and answer the real facts he calls for but then runs from when shown…
Where did Platt get that Jason?…
Another ridiculous post from “Buster” who once again uses the words of a author instead of posting actual documented evidence that is expected from him.
BUSTER says: Jason is obviously struggling to give a simple straight answer to “Where did Platt get the Treatment Time of 11:45 to 12:15?”…
JASON says: Funny how “Buster” makes up words like “struggling” for the phony claims he writes. Obviously, “Buster” is too ignorant to understand that I’ve already answered and refuted his bogus claims many times already.
BUSTER says: Any asshole can laugh and mock but where it counts the most Jason is noticeably unable to give any answer to where did Platt get that exact half hour that Bannister told of in his 11:45 to 12:15 treatment time entered in Mitch Mitchell’s book?…
JASON says: Another claim from a book, and “Buster” believes it’s true, after two doctors Dr. Siefert and Dr Brown refutes this phony “half hour treatment”. It’s the testimony from both doctors that refute this phony treatment. Also, hospitals don’t do treatments on long 6 hour dead corpses awaiting an autopsy.
BUSTER says: We’re still waiting for Jason to back up his blustering bullshit and answer the real facts he calls for but then runs from when shown…
JASON says: A claim from a book is not a fact when you still can never produce any of the evidence you claim. How about posting some documented evidence of your phony “treatment” claims you make? 10 years and nothing for you. Why can’t you produce this evidence that you claim happened? What’s the hold up?
BUSTER says: Where did Platt get that Jason?
JASON says: “Buster” is now trying to insinuate that Platt read a medical report that showed Jimi had “treatments” but no medical document ever exists. Another ploy from this joker to keep his debunked hoax going. Siefert and Brown said no “treatments” ever happened plus hospitals don’t do “treatments” on a 6 hour dead corpse.
If there was any “evidence” of these so called “treatments”, it would have been released decades ago. Nothing has since it never happened. We have another desperate last ditch effort by a wine troll citing a book that states nothing to prove the claims he makes.
Keep trying, but you never produce any evidence for your phony claims. Instead of asking ridiculous questions produce some evidence we are all waiting for it. You usual hot air and bluster doesn’t cut it.
All Mitch says in his book is Jimi was admitted to St Mary’s Hospital at 11.45 am and was officially pronounced dead at 12.15 pm. He also rules out the possibility of foul play or suicide which leaves accidental death. Mitch writes what the coroner revealed as inhalation of vomit. No where does Platt or Mitch state that this was treatment time done by Dr. Bannister or any other doctor. He agrees with the barbiturate level of nine tablets and he absolutely does not mention wine being present.
Well folks, anybody who believes this character Fraud Bannister needs to have their head examined. Jimi can’t magically change from being covered in vomit at a flat to being covered in wine a few minutes later at a hospital. Fraud Bannister wants you to believe “his story” as he told it 21 years later. In 1970 when he claims he had a “story”, he said it was a drug overdose but now claims all this imaginary wine that doesn’t exist. Fraud Bannister made no documentation of his “great discovery” or recorded any of his “so called procedures” as was required from him by law. But he says it “happened” so we just have to believe him and his extraordinary tales of wine. Anybody who has common sense can see this scam coming from a mile away.
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital.” – Ex Doctor Bannister
Ex Doctor Bannister described the condition of Jimi Hendrix when he reached the hospital. So, let’s see what he said about Jimi before he was frantically “working hard to save Jimi’s life”.
Bannister tells us Jimi was dead for hours. He goes on to say Jimi had no pulse. After that, he tells us in graphic detail about what he observed. The inside of Jimi’s mouth was black from being dead for hours. No circulation through any of his tissues either. And Buster the clown thinks Jimi could be brought back to life? Bannister described the condition of a man that was ready to be shipped off to the morgue. Not a man who would be having “half hour treatments”.
Dr. Siefert and Dr. Brown told it like it was when they said “nothing was done for Hendrix”. What could be done? Jimi was dead for hours and a long dead corpse awaiting an autopsy doesn’t have procedures performed on them. “Buster” the clown refuses to believe it, but he needs to step into reality and face the facts. No hospital would allow doctors to perform weird medical procedures on a dead corpse. It’s now up to the coroner to determine the cause of death. These phony stories of “half hour wine removal” procedures and dumping out the wine from inside Jimi’s body is asinine and only a freaking moron would think it was true. No hospital in the world would allow that to go on except for a decades old B horror movie.
Wine hoaxers have only phony claims and zero evidence and documentation to prove any of these phony claims. Fake stories is not evidence and we all know hospitals document everything and these frauds don’t have any evidence to produce to confirm their phony claims. If they did, they would have produced it decades ago. Their hoax is a fraud based on speculation and fake claims. And that’s all they will ever have.
Jason has already lost this “debate” by the normal terms of debate rules…If this were a credibly moderated debate Jason would have had the moderator rule against him and it would be over…
The Jason has it backwards and the one doing the “magic” is himself by trying to make the wine witnessed at the hospital not be present at the Samarkand…Again, in a credibly moderated debate Jason would be held to normal logic and reality and would not be able to try to use dishonest wording to get out of logical necessity…If all 3 doctors detected wine at St Mary Abbots then that means there was wine soaking Jimi at the Samarkand where the wine was located…Jason is trying to force semantics to mean there was only vomit at the Samarkand and no wine, but reality dictates that you can’t undo wine at the hospital and make it go away in the reverse at the Samarkand like Jason is dishonestly doing…Wine witnessed at the hospital necessitates wine witnessed at the Samarkand Hotel by logical necessity so Jason has broken the rules of evidence and in any court or credibly moderated debate he would be held accountable for it…
The trolls at Crosstown Torrents also tried to attack Bannister as a means of dishonestly denying the wine…Jason has gone to that website and read the debate there so he is also using that same ploy…Only it doesn’t work because we have Dr Siefert saying Jimi was covered in red wine…As usual, if you read Jason’s dishonest entry above he conspicuously avoids mentioning Dr Siefert’s comment in his vile attempt to smear and slander Bannister…
Jason is doubling down on his attack on Bannister but it isn’t working because he has violated the rules of evidence by ignoring Dr Siefert’s admission that “Jimi was covered in red wine”…He also ignores that the Inquest data sheet said in plain language “Unable To Resuscitate” (which means they did “work on Jimi” as Dr Siefert said)…And lastly, the time of that attempted resuscitation was given as 11:45 to 12:15 on the Hospital Report…By concentrating on defaming Bannister Jason thinks we don’t see him flagrantly avoiding the evidence…A judge or credible debate moderator would not let him get away with that…
John Platt was Mitch’s co-writer…When Mitch’s book was written Mitch’s wife Dee Mitchell was deeply involved with Kathy Etchingham’s investigation…You can be sure Dee was the source for the Hospital Report from which the 11:45 to 12:15 was gotten…As the underling, Bannister probably wrote up the report in the doctor’s rest area after they failed to save Jimi…So minutes after Bannister and Siefert took a half hour to remove wine and try to get Jimi breathing Bannister accurately recorded it in the Hospital Report…Dr Siefert was in charge so he read the entry and signed-off on the half hour treatment time Bannister entered…There is the documentation of the removal of the wine plus the half hour it took…Dr Siefert then confirmed it when he mentioned “Jimi was covered in red wine”…
So once again Jason…You refuse to answer the direct question of “Where did Platt get the 11:45 to 12:15 treatment time?”…How did Platt and Mitch, who were nowhere near the events in question, know the correct 11:45 time of admission and 12:15 quitting time?…
Answer the question Jason and stop trying to BS around it…
More of the same bluster and hot air from this joker. “Buster” types in his “authoritative tone” as he narrates his bogus commentary pretending he is an “authority” but never can produce any documents that prove his phony claims.
See, a real expert would have all the evidence ready to go being able to prove their case without any cheap stalling tactics like “Buster” does trying to steer the conversation into making people answer bogus questions that doesn’t even exist.
If “Buster” had any evidence, he would have produced it by now instead of stalling and playing games by asking lame questions claiming he won a “debate”. This is pathetic.
How about you produce some evidence “Buster”? Asking questions about non existent “treatments” doesn’t help you prove your phony wine claim.
BUSTER says: Jason has already lost this “debate” by the normal terms of debate rules…If this were a credibly moderated debate Jason would have had the moderator rule against him and it would be over…
JASON says: This is hilarious! You’ve lost months ago, when you never could produce any documented evidence to prove your phony claims. 10 years and you still can’t produce any evidence of your fake “wine removal”. All you do is blow hot air in long winded posts demanding that we answer your phony claims. Why can’t you post documented evidence instead of asking bogus questions to “debate”?
BUSTER says: The Jason has it backwards and the one doing the “magic” is himself by trying to make the wine witnessed at the hospital not be present at the Samarkand…
JASON says: In order for there to be “wine”, it would have to be witnessed first at the flat. Not phony claims of wine 21 years later with no documented evidence of anything. Not one man witnessed any wine at the flat nor was it documented in 1970 as a cause of Jimi’s death. The hospital clearly stated it was an overdose. You lose your hoax just on that alone.
BUSTER says: Again, in a credibly moderated debate Jason would be held to normal logic and reality and would not be able to try to use dishonest wording to get out of logical necessity…If all 3 doctors detected wine at St Mary Abbots then that means there was wine soaking Jimi at the Samarkand where the wine was located…Jason is trying to force semantics to mean there was only vomit at the Samarkand and no wine, but reality dictates that you can’t undo wine at the hospital and make it go away in the reverse at the Samarkand like Jason is dishonestly doing…Wine witnessed at the hospital necessitates wine witnessed at the Samarkand Hotel by logical necessity so Jason has broken the rules of evidence and in any court or credibly moderated debate he would be held accountable for it…
JASON says: You’ve been banned from many moderated debates for posting phony claims and abusive posts in forums
“Buster” is lying again as usual with his same b.s. lies. Doctor Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi Hendrix and he saw Hendrix wheeled in first by the ambulance men. Siefert was last documented as saying that “he detected no alcohol” on Jimi Hendrix. So, Buster has only one doctor who claims wine and that is Fraud Bannister. Brown never saw wine and Siefert is on the record as stating “no alcohol”.
More word games from this clown trying to claim “vomit means wine” and whining for “moderation” when “Buster” would already be banned for posting obscenities and character attacks like he’s been posting. That’s why he was banned from many sites and forums for abusive behavior.
BUSTER says: The trolls at Crosstown Torrents also tried to attack Bannister as a means of dishonestly denying the wine…Jason has gone to that website and read the debate there so he is also using that same ploy…Only it doesn’t work because we have Dr Siefert saying Jimi was covered in red wine…As usual, if you read Jason’s dishonest entry above he conspicuously avoids mentioning Dr Siefert’s comment in his vile attempt to smear and slander Bannister…
JASON says: Bannister has no documented evidence that he was by law required to record of his phony claims. Bannister has no documented evidence, only the absurd bogus claims he makes that “Buster” religiously parrots.
Any sane individual would not believe a 3 count convicted fraud ex doctor without having documented evidence to back up his claims. No documented evidence exists. That’s why people don’t believe this fraud.
Bannister also stated in 1970 that it was a drug overdose and not a “wine drowning” that he magically claimed 21 years later.
Dr. Siefert is also on the record stating “he detected no alcohol on Jimi” and there is no documentation that proves Jimi “was covered in wine”. This would be clearly documented if it was accurate but nothing exists. So. Buster the clown is only forced to rant like a loon making bogus claims with no evidence he can ever produce.
Instead of rambling on, why don’t you ever produce any real documented evidence for your phony claims?
BUSTER says: Jason is doubling down on his attack on Bannister but it isn’t working because he has violated the rules of evidence by ignoring Dr Siefert’s admission that “Jimi was covered in red wine”…He also ignores that the Inquest data sheet said in plain language “Unable To Resuscitate” (which means they did “work on Jimi” as Dr Siefert said)…And lastly, the time of that attempted resuscitation was given as 11:45 to 12:15 on the Hospital Report…By concentrating on defaming Bannister Jason thinks we don’t see him flagrantly avoiding the evidence…A judge or credible debate moderator would not let him get away with that…
JASON says: Round and round this wine troll goes repeating the same nonsense that’s already been debunked.
A judge would already have convicted you of fraud for your blatant lies and phony story changing claims claims
How many times does this need to be told to you? Hendrix was dead on arrival. Are you this stupid still not to know that? Siefert hooked Jimi up in a resuscitation formality attempt. He was already dead so he was “Unable to Resuscitate”. By law any resuscitation attempt is required to go on the death report. This is hospital protocol and you are ignorant to the facts. “Unable To Resuscitate” does not mean “operations” were performed, the basic formality qualifies as resuscitation. No documents exist of any “treatments” and both Siefert and Brown said “nothing more was done for Jimi” This is why you lose since none of your phony claims are documented.
Nothing was ever documented anywhere about “red wine”. that means there was no “red wine” “Buster” the clown can never produce any documents to prove his phony claim.
BUSTER says: John Platt was Mitch’s co-writer…When Mitch’s book was written Mitch’s wife Dee Mitchell was deeply involved with Kathy Etchingham’s investigation…You can be sure Dee was the source for the Hospital Report from which the 11:45 to 12:15 was gotten…
JASON says: This is another bogus claim by “Buster” the clown with no evidence. This would have been released if this was the case and no documentation ever exists of any “treatments” since two doctors Brown and Siefert said it never happened.
Instead of blowing hot air with your phony claims, produce this evidence “Mr. Expert Researcher”. Gonna wait for another 10 years making more bogus claims?
BUSTER says: As the underling, Bannister probably wrote up the report in the doctor’s rest area after they failed to save Jimi…
JASON says: Another fake “probably” claim from this wine troll who is making up more crap since no report exists This troll sure knows how to invent fake stories. He should spend more time getting “evidence” instead of blowing smoke with his fiction tales. .
BUSTER says: So minutes after Bannister and Siefert took a half hour to remove wine and try to get Jimi breathing Bannister accurately recorded it in the Hospital Report…
JASON says: WTF dude! Jimi was dead for 6 hours and could not be saved. He could never be breathing again. His brain was dead and his corpse was rotting.
More total b.s. from this lunatic since no report ever exists and no “wine removal” was ever performed.
BUSTER says: Dr Siefert was in charge so he read the entry and signed-off on the half hour treatment time Bannister entered…There is the documentation of the removal of the wine plus the half hour it took…Dr Siefert then confirmed it when he mentioned “Jimi was covered in red wine”…
JASON says: More horseshit from this troll who can never produce these documents since hey don’t exist. Siefert signed off on nothing since he stated he did nothing for Jimi Hendrix.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Here is Dr. Siefert telling this deranged nut hat he did nothing for Jimi Hendrix cuz he was dead.
BUSTER says: So once again Jason…You refuse to answer the direct question of “Where did Platt get the 11:45 to 12:15 treatment time?”…How did Platt and Mitch, who were nowhere near the events in question, know the correct 11:45 time of admission and 12:15 quitting time?…
Answer the question Jason and stop trying to BS around it…
JASON says: Nothing on record states a phony “wine removal” since no documentation of it exists. If this information existed. it would have been released decades ago and “proved” all these phony procedures you claim.
Since you claim Platt saw “documents” of” wine removal” why can’t you produce them to prove your phony claim?
This is all on you since you are making “wine claims” saying “documents exist”.
Produce these documents you say exists.
Put up or shut up.
More bogus nonsense and fairy tales. No report ever exists and “Buster” just makes these fantasy fairy tales.
Jimi was a dead 6 hour corpse who could never be saved or breathe again.
“Buster” absurdly believes a 6 hour dead rotting corpse would “be brought back to life”. This is the “intelligent” person we are dealing with folks LOL.
Buster” has lost this months ago when he failed to produce any evidence for his phony claims.
Pathetically “Buster” is forced to make up a bogus claim that Bannister “wrote up reports in a rest area” that never even happened. Since you claim this “report” exits why don’t you produce it?
Siefert and Brown are documented saying nothing was done for Jimi and this troll recycles his same phony myths over and over.
No documentation from these “treatments” ever exists and instead of “Buster” asking questions, why doesn’t he produce this document?
If this existed it would have been released decades ago.
It never was since it doesn’t exist.
Hi Jason. I was wondering what would make the doctors think that Jimi warranted a resuscitation attempt if he had been dead for hours. This story was added onto years later after Wright’s book came out and read by Bannister where he concocted the wine story in retrospect . It’s just not possible for any of this to have happened in real life. The thought that Jimi had a tube down his throat to suction out five bottles worth of red wine how did the doctors know that Jimi’s body contained that just by looking at him without proper X-rays first or that Jimi had a hard plug of vomit blocking the wine. This could only have been revealed during an autopsy. This is a make believe scenario and hoax story; the doctors would not have wasted their time on someone that could not have possibly been saved without first determining if someone could be saved without the proper imaging and tests. Never on a long dead corpse would any procedures be performed.
Ivana,
This whole thing is one giant hoax. Everything this troll wants you to believe is impossible and would never happen in real life.
6 hour dead corpses don’t receive 30 minute resuscitation attempts. Siefert and Brown are on the record stating no such thing ever happened. But he wine troll “Buster” ignores it repeating his fake made up claims to keep his debunked hoax going.
Hospitals document everything. But this troll wants you to believe hospitals operate on 21-40 year old phony claims with no documentation. This is bogus.
if any of these claims ever happened, Kathy would have the documentation and released it. Nothing ever existed. That’s how we know this is all fake.
Doctors don’t perform “procedures” on a dead corpse. The coroner does that.
Then we get a bogus story that Bannister removed “bottles worth” of wine with a small suction tube in 20 minutes after a “hard plug of vomit” was removed all on a dead 6 hour corpse he expected to wake up and start breathing again. He belongs in an insane asylum.
Trying to suction out body full of wine would take hours with that small device. And the he says he “dumped all the wine down the drain” That is criminal to destroy an autopsy result.
All these claims and stories are fake and there is no evidence to prove it true.
Buster was swearing at you. He does that when you bunk his garbage.
10 years and counting and that troll still has no documentation of wine.
Kathy’s investigation was extensive and despite this there was no mention of copious amounts of red wine as cause of death. The investigation revealed that Jimi had been dead for a number of hours before the ambulance was called and this delay may have contributed to his death. Dr Crompton then added that Jimi’s liver was so congested that he could not have survived. Whether or not there was wine present is immaterial as this did not cause Jimi’s death. You cannot resuscitate a long dead corpse; this is a ludicrous scenario to even contemplate or attempt. The doctors observed that Jimi had been dead for a while and would never have attempted half hour work on Jimi as this would have been a futile exercise. Dr. Seifert stated that he pounded Jimi’s chest for a few minutes and then waited for Gerry Stickells to identify the body in that half hour. This scenario is more consistent with someone being brought into casualty who had been long dead. Resuscitation is only ever attempted in cases of immediate death when there is a possibility that the person has a chance of survival. If a person is DOA they are examined by the doctors in casualty and then sent to the morgue and then an autopsy is performed to establish cause of death. The doctors in casualty are not permitted by law to tamper with the dead body in any way with any invasive procedures as this may destroy vital clues. If the doctors who attended to Jimi did perform any procedures then they would have been reprimanded for medical misconduct.
It has already been explained that Kathy missed the boat on the wine because Caesar Glebbeek failed to make Bannister’s letter public…When Bannister wrote the letter explaining the wine to Glebbeek in January 1992 instead of taking it and entering it into Kathy’s petition like he should have Glebbeek buried it…This has already been explained in this thread…So if this were a credibly moderated debate or court room Ivana would be held accountable for ignoring that and suggesting Kathy should have mentioned the wine…Kathy trusted Scotland Yard…She had no idea they were in cahoots with the murderers…
It has also been explained to Ivana that Crompton was gotten to…He even said Jimi could have taken as little as 5 pills…That of course was not possible with the high amounts of barbiturate in Jimi’s liver and blood Ivana mentions…Crompton was screwing up his own information because he had caused trouble by correctly citing a 5:30am time of death…What it goes by is the blood level and the .7mg recorded at autopsy was survivable by a person with a high tolerance like Jimi had… Ivana is using deceptive language by saying Jimi’s liver was “congested”…His liver was not damaged like Ivana infers…Teare made a notation in Jimi’s autopsy that said his organs were in exceptionally healthy shape…No matter how much Ivana lies the truth is 9 Vesparax cannot kill a person with a high tolerance…That’s what Monika’s doctors determined and they were correct…
The rest is just Ivana parroting Jason’s trolling and thinking people are stupid enough to take it seriously…
This is speculation not evidence. This is what you believe masked as fact and rhetoric. Dr. Crompton stated that Jimi couldn’t have survived so that is pretty conclusive. How could Jimi have had a high tolerance if the barbiturates were of a toxic level so much so that they caused him to choke on his own vomit. Take away the Vesparax and there would not have been a death scene. You are clever at manipulating the facts in order to verify the waterboarding scenario which of course only happened in Wright’s book and never took place in real life. Caesar buried that letter because it was incredulous; like Kathy he did not buy into the murder scenario and explains that if Jimi had not taken the nine Vesparax he would not have died that day. The state of Jimi’s organs have nothing to do with the cause of death from inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. The problem with your scenario is that everyone is a liar and there was a massive cover-up by all involved in the death of a rock star and the only good guy in this story is Dr. Bannister. In a radio interview Kathy said she did not believe that Jimi was murdered so who exactly are the murderers you talk about?
Again – you are breaking the rules of evidence…If you did that in a court room or credibly moderated debate you would be forced to account for it or face censure…You are ignoring that barbiturate doses and their effects are determined by the blood level…They measured a .7mg barbiturate blood level at Jimi’s autopsy that reflected the 9 tablets he took…The point you are failing to answer, and therefore breaking the rules of evidence, is that since the product manufacturer openly listed Lethal Dose as being “9 to 10 tablets” that means Jimi, with his famous tolerance, was safe from overdose…You are ignoring that I have posted and repeated several times that barbiturate science says a person with a tolerance can take up to 10,000mg to reach Lethal Dose…A person with no tolerance will overdose on the Secobarbital ingredient of Vesparax at 2000mg…9 Vesparax contains 1800mg of barbiturate…If Jimi had a 3000mg tolerance he was well clear from overdose…If we were to have this debate in a strict, academically-overseen forum you would be forced to answer this…If you continued to ignore it and entered regressive, evasive arguments like you are doing you would be removed from the debate…You’re getting away with your denial trolling because this comments section is un-moderated…What I wrote here is not speculation…It is hard evidence you haven’t answered…It is verifiable fact and you have offered nothing to show otherwise…
Dr Crompton’s statements can be seen to change after the first time he spoke to Kathy and told her Jimi died at 5:30am…From then on his statements were noticeably evasive and he was trying to get out of what he said…He was obviously gotten to just like Siefert…
You are once again violating the rules of evidence when you use the false claim that Jimi choked on dry vomit in order to deny his well-known tolerance…Jimi’s friends were well known to speak of Jimi’s tolerance for drugs…In the ‘Soundtrack’ movie Fayne Pridgeon said “If Jimi took 3 we knew we better take 1″…A few weeks before his death Jimi was witnessed taking a hand full of barbiturates and washing it down with a pint of whiskey…He never even passed out…In that event he did have a high blood alcohol content…He never vomited violently…This is evidence of that high tolerance…What this tells you is something else besides the pills caused Jimi to vomit on 9-18 and it might have something to do with the 5 bottles of wine the attending emergency room physician witnessed…I already told about that other barbiturate event in Denmark in another post…If you ignored it like you did here and made the same disproven point again in a court with a judge you would be censured and thrown out of the court room…
I agree that if you took away the Vesparax there would not have been a death scene…A sober and conscious Hendrix would have fought his assassins like a tiger…
Caesar is a notorious murder denier…He wrote a rotten disinformation work in order to mis-lead the public on Jimi’s death…His reasons for burying the letter and its exposing Jimi being drowned in wine is obvious…Caesar is the one who is credulous…My evidence proves why the wine witnessing is real and also why the coward Glebbeek betrayed Jimi by hiding important evidence…
Kathy only went as far as going after Monika…When the evidence went past Monika to the real killers she stopped…I have spoken to Kathy and what you say about her not believing Jimi was murdered is not true…
You’ve got real balls saying that my position requires calling everyone a liar when you and that nut Jason have done nothing but call all the main murder witnesses liars or people looking to make money from books…That’s the kind of obscene backwards accusation that you get from trolls I guess…
In a radio interview with Glebbeek, the woman who was there that morning, Monika Dannemann said “There was information I could not bring to the police…Jimi was murdered by the mafia for sure”…
Ask Kathy to do a radio interview with me you wicked lying piece of shit Ivana…
BUSTER says: Ask Kathy to do a radio interview with me you wicked lying piece of shit Ivana
JASON says: Why would Kathy do an interview with a lunatic wine troll? Maybe she should. She would tell you off and laugh you off the air. You would look just as bad as you do posting here.
That’s name-calling trolling Jason…Denial trolls always try to get the discussion down to their level of pure trolling and name-calling like Jason does here…That way they can avoid the evidence they are not answering like Jason is doing here…Jason says I’m the one who looks bad but I’m not the one running from a court room level forensic argument that he has been unable to acknowledge or give any answer to every time I’ve posted it…The reason Jason can’t touch that forensic argument (besides maybe being too stupid to understand it) is because it is irrefutable and the only thing he can do is troll it…The only reason we are still talking to Jason is because Justin doesn’t moderate his room and Jason is allowed to get away with asinine trolling in response to the best evidence on the internet…As soon as we got this to a serious venue where Jason was held accountable and forced to answer my forensic argument instead of getting away with trolling it he would be gone…
I know Kathy and the reason she would not go on the air with me is because she doesn’t want to go there…Jason is doing idiotic trolling but he’s not answering the fact Kathy is responsible for discovering the true timeline my forensic argument is based on…Kathy would not do a radio interview with me because she knows where it would go and she doesn’t want to go there…She stops at Monika but anyone could see the evidence doesn’t…
Jason doesn’t follow the rules of evidence – which is why he’s a troll…The rules of evidence dictate that since my forensic argument is good that therefore my credibility speaks for itself as far as any radio show with Kathy…Since the evidence comes first in all common definitions of civilized order I have met the bar and the onus therefore shifts to others not me…If we brought this to a serious venue like a court room with a judge this asshole Jason would quickly be removed and serious discussion would resume…Jason would be removed once he trolled a serious forensic argument instead of answering it like he does here…
BUSTER says: That’s name-calling trolling Jason…Denial trolls always try to get the discussion down to their level of pure trolling and name-calling like Jason does here…That way they can avoid the evidence they are not answering like Jason is doing here…Jason says I’m the one who looks bad but I’m not the one running from a court room level forensic argument that he has been unable to acknowledge or give any answer to every time I’ve posted it…The reason Jason can’t touch that forensic argument (besides maybe being too stupid to understand it) is because it is irrefutable and the only thing he can do is troll it…The only reason we are still talking to Jason is because Justin doesn’t moderate his room and Jason is allowed to get away with asinine trolling in response to the best evidence on the internet…As soon as we got this to a serious venue where Jason was held accountable and forced to answer my forensic argument instead of getting away with trolling it he would be gone…
JASON says: You deny and distort and troll the official record which will forever be untouched as the truth of Jimi’s death.
Your forensic argument is a joke and I’ve already debunked it. You should have been banned long ago just like you were on many sites like Wikipedia, Amazon, and various internet sites and forums.
BUSTER says: I know Kathy and the reason she would not go on the air with me is because she doesn’t want to go there…Jason is doing idiotic trolling but he’s not answering the fact Kathy is responsible for discovering the true timeline my forensic argument is based on…Kathy would not do a radio interview with me because she knows where it would go and she doesn’t want to go there…She stops at Monika but anyone could see the evidence doesn’t…
JASON says: More b.s. coming from you. Kathy knows Jimi wasn’t “murdered” and not one person she got testimony from even hinted at it. Kathy wouldn’t waste her time with a clown like you.
BUSTER says: Jason doesn’t follow the rules of evidence – which is why he’s a troll…The rules of evidence dictate that since my forensic argument is good that therefore my credibility speaks for itself as far as any radio show with Kathy…Since the evidence comes first in all common definitions of civilized order I have met the bar and the onus therefore shifts to others not me…If we brought this to a serious venue like a court room with a judge this asshole Jason would quickly be removed and serious discussion would resume…Jason would be removed once he trolled a serious forensic argument instead of answering it like he does here…
JASON says: I post actual documented evidence. You make up shit in your crazy head distorting the real evidence. That makes you the troll and it’s why you’ve been banned almost everywhere for trolling.
I’ve posted real forensics no the crap you make up in your crazy head.
You have zero credibility and Kathy wouldn’t even waste her time on you.
Buster please stop making up false things. You are really getting on my nerves. None of this really happened it is just your take on what you think happened. Kathy and Michael Fairchild went out and got some real evidence about what happened that morning and nothing they revealed came close to a murder scene. If it is verifiable fact then this escaped the doctors, the ambulance officers, the Hendrix personnel and the biographers around that time. These are a lot of people who were duped. Tappy Wright came out with this nonsense about the waterboarding even though it has now been revealed to be a hoax. These accusations did not exist before then. Dr. Bannister simply jumped on the bandwagon in 1992 with copious amount of red wine produced by a corpse that had been dead for many hours. How can this possibly sound reasonable and how do you explain this when it is unlawful for any doctor to tamper with a dead body before the autopsy is performed if it is DOA? Red wine does not automatically disappear from casualty to Dr.Teare. If he witnessed that amount of wine he would have written it up as part of his report. Don’t go into that rubbish that he was coerced into changing his story when he performed autopsies on other prominent people as well. Caesar was a fan of Monika and never believed she had anything to do with Jimi’s death. Monika made accusations of murder against the Mafia, Devon Wilson and of malpractice against the doctors to shift the blame from her actions that morning. Everything she said about that morning has been discredited so I would not be citing anything she said as the truth. And please note I do not need to parrot anyone as I have read the information myself in credible books from credible authors/biographers the same as Jason has and none of them wrote that Jimi was murdered or came close to believing it. And another thing about Monika didn’t you say in an earlier post that she was an accomplice along with Michael Jeffrey so now you believe it was the Mafia actually siding with Monika on this? So which is it Buster etc?
Every time I post hard evidence Ivana returns with that overly-general opinionating crap…This is yet another time that Ivana has responded to the hard forensics by ignoring them…If she did that in a credibly-moderated debate or court room that would be the end of her and we would no longer have to deal with her contemptuous trolling…This is all very simple…My forensic proof is good by the mere fact the two demented trolls Ivana and Jason can’t give any answer to it…That’s how debate works and it is why I won this “debate” long ago…The problem here is Justin refuses to moderate two obvious assholes who are only here for the trolling and getting the attention of a response…
To show what a clueless nut Ivana is, Michael Fairchild was one of the biggest exposers of the wine back in 1990 when he became the first to intelligently tackle it…The truth is Kathy and Fairchild are responsible for exposing the timeline that helped me establish the murder evidence…To say those two were responsible for disproving the murder is such a crazy backwards obscenity that it should be grounds for banning in itself…It just goes to show what demented trolls Ivana and Jason are that she would pose two of the persons who are responsible for exposing the murder as doing the opposite…Ivana offers simple-minded bullshit…So she never quite gets to the point of realizing my proof is based on the evidence Etchingham and Fairchild exposed…
The murder ploy of forced drowning in wine in order to look like a reckless drug overdose worked as intended…It isn’t difficult when you control the main witness, authorities, medical personnel, autopsy, and Inquest…The Hendrix personnel Ivana cites were loyal to Jeffery and were just trying not to get killed themselves…Ivana suggests a nobility and truthfulness in those people they may not have possessed under the circumstances…
Ivana has no clue about Tappy’s background…Her depth is as far as trolling this comments section…I knew Tappy closely and spoke to him for hours and hours on the phone…His experiences are not so simply dismissed when you get to the details of his true relationship with Jeffery and his background…Just to show what a moron Ivana is, she says no accusations of Jimi being murdered came out before Tappy’s revelation in 2009…She ignores that Bannister’s letter to Glebbeek was in January 1992…And Kathy’s petition started in 1990…Dumb…I’ve extensively interviewed many people who were directly involved at the time and most of them said there were rumors at the time amongst them that foul play was involved in Jimi’s death…And don’t forget Albert Allen who had his witnessing in January 1971…
I know Dr Bannister and he is not a “band wagon jumper”…He sent his letter to Glebbeek to defend himself against Monika’s false accusations of malpractice…Ivana’s defamation is a smear of Bannister that I would absolutely love to see Bannister sue Jason and Ivana over and I would happily bear witness against them…
Ivana’s ham-handed idiocy ignores that Teare did recognize the wine when he estimated a 100mg blood alcohol content at time of ingestion of the pills…Teare did that because he realized the actual 5mg blood alcohol content was too low to support the accidental choking on vomit drug/alcohol cause of death…But once again, Ivana has it backwards and uses reverse denial logic to distract you from the fact she hasn’t answered for Dr Siefert’s clear witnessing of “Jimi being covered in red wine”…Jimi was nude in the morgue so any wine that was soaking him was probably washed off or minimized…Therefore the wine Siefert spoke of didn’t fully make it to Teare…Like Jason, Ivana hasn’t credibly answered for the wine Dr Siefert made more than clear and her dishonest trolling hasn’t made it go away…Dr Thurston’s quote of Jimi having a stomach full of red wine was real and none of Jason or Ivana’s trolling has made it go away…So the information of the wine did somehow make it to Dr Teare from St Mary’s…Probably via Siefert, as head registrar, which is proof of a cover-up…
Caesar is a scumbag who traded Jimi’s head (a person he made his income from through his ‘UniVibes’ Magazine) for future access to all the Hendrix people…Caesar covered their lies and therefore made himself desirable to them for future access to the Hendrix information he needed for his magazine…He’s a real piece of shit and Judas to Jimi who sold Jimi down the river to his murderers for his own convenience…This appears to be all too common amongst the Europeans and Brits…
Monika lied over just about everything from that morning because she was trying to cover-up murder evidence…The reason she said Jimi was murdered on the air in 1975 is because she was trying to get ahead of several magazine articles that raised questions about Jimi’s death for the first time…She wanted to look like she was on the right side of it for purposes of damage control…
You’re a moron Ivana because once you establish that Monika was lying about everything then you don’t just drop it like you do…Any court or credible investigation would then proceed to find out why she was lying and what really happened…You don’t just drop it like you do and seek no further…Any competent investigation of Monika and her lies will show that she lied because she got drawn in to a murder plot and was so deep in that she couldn’t speak the truth without incriminating herself or getting killed…People don’t end up dying like Monika did over an accidental drug overdose…
It is simply an outright fucking lie to say none of the biographers said Jimi was murdered…One of the top biographers, David Henderson, whom I’ve also spoken to, unlike this lying piece of shit Ivana, said outright that Jimi did not die the way that was officially claimed and spelled-out the reason for him being murdered…Glebbeek’s partner Shapiro broke his relationship with Caesar over Caesar’s denial of Jimi’s murder and went on to write several articles in ‘Classic Rock’ magazine suggesting Jimi’s death involved foul play…You’re insulting the intelligence of the readers by lying about this Ivana and also establishing your troll status…
You ignored firm proof above Ivana…In a court or credibly-moderated debate you wouldn’t be allowed to get away with that…Since I can’t put you on block I guess I’ll go back to ignoring you…Your idiotic trolling isn’t worth my time…
Another long winded post from this troll.
But guess what folks?
No documented evidence for his phony claims.
10 years and counting……and still nothin’
“Still nothing” he says while being moronically unable to offer anything but a one-line “You’ve got no evidence” troll to a massive amount of evidence he can’t answer…
Anyone can see the evidence Jason was unable answer like the half hour treatment time…
BUSTER says: “Still nothing” he says while being moronically unable to offer anything but a one-line “You’ve got no evidence” troll to a massive amount of evidence he can’t answer…
Anyone can see the evidence Jason was unable answer like the half hour treatment time…
JASON says: Post some documented Hospital reports of evidence of your phony “half hour treatment time”.
You can’t do it cuz it never happened. LOL
10 years and counting and you still got nothin’.
The article you mention by Shapiro was written in regards to Wright’s book which has been discredited as you well know Buster. No wonder you mentioned this article because it tallies with what you believe happened to Jimi. In an interview David Henderson uses the words I think, I don’t know, maybe at least he is being honest. He also accused Mitch and Noel of racism something they found highly offensive. Your rants read like a plot out of a murder novel or James Bond movie or an episode of Miss Marple and Poirot. You offer only speculation, rhetoric and conjecture disguised as fact done in pseudo detective like fashion. Anyone reading your posts need to be aware that you are a manipulating the evidence to suit your murder theory. You have a habit of giving credence to books that have little value such as Wright’s and Allen’s purposely steering the reader towards these in the hope of convincing us that a murder did take place. Another ploy you use to discredit the original findings is to say that people were coerced into changing their stories or you use derogatory language with anyone who disagrees with you in order to make yourself look credible and the only authority on the subject and the custodian of the truth. In reality your posts sound very much like fiction with no resemblance to what really occurred that morning.
“Sister Ivana Sow says:
November 13, 2019 at 2:37 pm
The article you mention by Shapiro was written in regards to Wright’s book which has been discredited as you well know Buster’
You’re full of shit, you lying piece of pigshit. Shapiro’s article wasn’t written entirely in regards to Wright’s book — only partially and the article that I have seen by Shapiro references a whole lot more than Tappy Wright’s claim. Shapiro even says there is no statue of limitations on murder at the end of the article that I have seen.
Show us a link to that article, that you are referring to.
It’s you (Sister Ivana Sow) that has been discredited & your posts clearly indicate that you sit in your mommy’s basement picking fabrications out of your ass with your toothbrush.
And both you and your mommy are so fat & ugly that you and her both use a washing machine for a vibrator.
“Sister Ivana Sow says:
November 13, 2019 at 2:37 pm
In reality MY posts sound very much like fiction with no resemblance to what really occurred that morning.”
^^FIXED !!
Ivana is obviously clueless and just talking out her ass…She’s dumb enough to try to get away with answering the point about Shapiro with the stupid dodge of it being about Tappy’s article…Anyone who has actually read Shapiro’s article would know it deals in a lot more than Tappy’s book…Ivana is too dumb and too uncredible to realize Shapiro is a major source by himself because of his extensive research as Glebbeek’s partner and can’t be so stupidly dismissed…His article makes it clear that his suggestion Jeffery murdered Jimi comes from the evidence he discusses not Tappy Wright…
Your trying to get around Henderson’s outright statement that Jimi did not die of a drug overdose is typical of your squirrely trolling…If he didn’t die of the official overdose then what did he die of?…Henderson makes it quite clear what he is suggesting…
Did you know that James Bond was written by an ex-Intelligence agent who mined his Intelligence experience for material?…Damned right it sounds like James Bond, you idiot…That’s because it is…
Again, Ivana offers trolling blather because she can’t give any credible, direct answer to my ironclad forensics that prove by science that Jimi did not die by a choking on vomit overdose…Nor will she honestly or directly answer Dr Siefert’s direct admission that Jimi was covered in red wine…
Buster can never produce any evidence for his claims. All he does is discredit the real evidence for his phony garbage.
“JASON says:
November 13, 2019 at 5:35 pm
Jason can never produce any evidence for his claims. All Jason does is discredit the real evidence for his phony garbage.”
^^FIXED !!
FLYSWATTER says: Jason can never produce any evidence for his claims. All Jason does is discredit the real evidence for his phony garbage.”
JASON says: I don’t need to produce any more evidence. The real evidence has already been determined and documented through Jimi’s autopsy and recorded in history. The real death of Jimi Hendrix is etched in stone forever and that is a drug overdose. You can’t do anything about it to change it.
You are making the phony wine claims in which you can never produce any evidence to prove it. It is up to you to do that, in which you never will. All you can do is whine and post bogus conspiracy theories. Which is why your garbage is all a hoax.
“JASON says:
November 13, 2019 at 6:08 pm
I don’t need to produce any more evidence. The real evidence has already been determined and documented through Jimi’s autopsy and recorded in history. The real death of Jimi Hendrix is etched in stone forever and that is a drug overdose. You can’t do anything about it to change it.”
Don’t need produce evidence? Then what Jason is telling everyone is that he doesn’t have any documentation supporting his “no wine” or “no treatment done” hoaxes and that Jason is just blatantly lying regarding his “no wine” or “no treatment done” hoaxes and that Jason can’t back them up with anything — thereby proving that Jason’s hoaxes are nothing but self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass.
Jason is also telling everybody that he has no answer to “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make an ESTIMATE of 100mg of blood alcohol content at the time of Vesparax ingestion, if there was ‘no wine’, as Jason claims”?
Jason also can’t answer “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had too much to drink”, if there was no wine. And it has already been proven that Dr. Brown wasn’t citing Jimi’s autopsy report, as Dr. Brown would know from reading that autopsy, that Dr. Teare’s statement of 100mg BAC was only an ESTIMATE and that Jimi’s real BAC was .005%. No doctor anywhere in the world is going to refer to a BAC of .005% as being “too much to drink”.
FLYSWATTER says:November 13, 2019 at 6:08 pm
I don’t need to produce any more evidence. The real evidence has already been determined and documented through Jimi’s autopsy and recorded in history. The real death of Jimi Hendrix is etched in stone forever and that is a drug overdose. You can’t do anything about it to change it.”
Don’t need produce evidence? Then what Jason is telling everyone is that he doesn’t have any documentation supporting his “no wine” or “no treatment done” hoaxes and that Jason is just blatantly lying regarding his “no wine” or “no treatment done” hoaxes and that Jason can’t back them up with anything — thereby proving that Jason’s hoaxes are nothing but self-decreed fabrications that he pulls out of his ass.
Jason is also telling everybody that he has no answer to “why would Dr. Teare feel the need to make an ESTIMATE of 100mg of blood alcohol content at the time of Vesparax ingestion, if there was ‘no wine’, as Jason claims”?
Jason also can’t answer “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had too much to drink”, if there was no wine. And it has already been proven that Dr. Brown wasn’t citing Jimi’s autopsy report, as Dr. Brown would know from reading that autopsy, that Dr. Teare’s statement of 100mg BAC was only an ESTIMATE and that Jimi’s real BAC was .005%. No doctor anywhere in the world is going to refer to a BAC of .005% as being “too much to drink”.
JASON says: All the real evidence debunks your phony claims and you can’t produce one shred of documented evidence to prove your fake claims. Enjoy playing word games cuz you have nothing and you never will . The documented evidence is etched in stone forever and nothing you claim will ever change it. LOL
^^TRANSLATED: Jason can’t stomach having his own word games turned back on him because Jason gets made to eat for his dinner, his very own pigshit mire that he likes to wallow in.
Flyswatter just proved that Dr Brown could not have been speaking of the autopsy report when referring to Jimi having too much to drink because that report, and its trace blood alcohol amount, proved that Jimi did not have too much to drink…So obviously Brown was referring to the wine Dr Siefert said Jimi was covered in…Jason just dodged answering that and came back with a primitive “You have no documentation” troll instead of answering what Flyswatter said… That is a violation of the rules of evidence and Jason would forfeit at the level of the court room proof he pretends but then runs from in public when shown…
You wouldn’t get away with that in a credibly overseen real world forum outside of Justin’s troll-favoring room…You would be made to answer the fact Dr Brown wasn’t going to look at a trace blood alcohol content and describe it as having “too much to drink”…Obviously Brown smelled and saw the same wine Jimi was soaked in, just like Siefert and the now-vindicated Bannister, whom Jason’s troll attack failed to discredit…Which means the ambulance men had to have seen it too…
BUSTER says: Flyswatter just proved that Dr Brown could not have been speaking of the autopsy report when referring to Jimi having too much to drink because that report, and its trace blood alcohol amount, proved that Jimi did not have too much to drink…So obviously Brown was referring to the wine Dr Siefert said Jimi was covered in…Jason just dodged answering that and came back with a primitive “You have no documentation” troll instead of answering what Flyswatter said… That is a violation of the rules of evidence and Jason would forfeit at the level of the court room proof he pretends but then runs from in public when shown…
JASON says: You mean your other fake alias. You never proved anything cuz there is no hospital reports of Jimi being “covered in wine” or having a “wine removal”. Hospitals document everything and you have nothing to show.
Brown was citing Dr. Teare’s autopsy report. You have no documented reports to counter it.
BUSTER says: You wouldn’t get away with that in a credibly overseen real world forum outside of Justin’s troll-favoring room…You would be made to answer the fact Dr Brown wasn’t going to look at a trace blood alcohol content and describe it as having “too much to drink”…Obviously Brown smelled and saw the same wine Jimi was soaked in, just like Siefert and the now-vindicated Bannister, whom Jason’s troll attack failed to discredit…Which means the ambulance men had to have seen it too…
JASON says: Only a loser who has lost still whines like you do. You’ve been banned from almost very site on the internet for trolling and making up fake conspiracy theories.
You are in clear violation of the real evidence by changing your fake stories and making up new crap to peddle your hoax.
Brown never has stated anywhere that he “smelled wine” wine on Jimi Hendrix. Brown never said anything about wine in any testimony. Dr. Teare analyzed no wine on Jimi’s body or inside his body. You are lying fraud turd.
You are a lying troll who’s been banned everywhere that just makes up crap for your fake stories.
I know Shapiro, have interviewed him, and spoken to him by telephone several times…
You’re not dealing with idiots here Ivana…
Your excuses are seriously not working…
Another phony claimed “interview”.
How about producing some documents for your phony claims?
The real evidence of Jimi’s death has already been determined and documented through Jimi’s autopsy and recorded in history. The real death of Jimi Hendrix is etched in stone forever and that is a drug overdose. You can’t do anything about it to change it. You are unable to produce any documents to prove your phony wine claims. All you can do is post long winded comments with zero results in 10 years. That’s pathetic.
Get off your imaginary high horse along with your pseudo and fake scenarios and your psychotic rants. Talking about a murder that never took place all the while hiding behind various pseudonyms. You seriously believe you are in the same league as Ian Fleming or in the caliber of the forensic experts who dealt with Jimi’s case? Funny how you have spoken to all these experts and you have still managed to come up with a false set of circumstances. What a waste of time for them having to deal with a nutter tin foil hatter who no one takes seriously and who has been booted from various sites because of his questionable posts and offensive language towards anyone who disagreed with him.You need to seriously reconsider what you are offering up as evidence here Buster otherwise you will forever be remembered as the dealer in fantasy and a laughable one at that. GET REAL. No one with a healthy sense of skepticism or intelligence would ever fall for what you put out Buster etc., only the truly gullible would; something Jason and myself are definitely not.
“Sister Ivana Sow says:
November 13, 2019 at 5:15 pm
Get off your imaginary high horse along with your pseudo and fake scenarios and your psychotic rants.”
Get off of your Maytag washing machine that you use for a vibrator, as the vibrating is obviously rattling your brain located too close to the vibration. seeing that you got your head located in the same place that you get all of your self-decreed fabrications from — namely your own ass.
BTW, I know for a fact that somebody that was close to Jimi does in fact take Buster seriously, contrary to claim of “no one takes seriously”– he played at Woodstock with Jimi and appeared with Jimi on Dick Cavett’s TV show in 1969. His name is Juma Sultan & he has spoken openly about Jimi’s problems with the management at that time.
LOL.
Where is your documentation of wine?
*crickets*
“JASON says:
November 13, 2019 at 6:01 pm
LOL.
Where is your documentation of wine?
*crickets*”
Jack Meehan first documented it on Sept. 29, 1970 when Dr. Thurston told Meehan that “a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed” regarding Jimi’s stomach contents.
Dr. Teare made reference to it in his autopsy report when he made his 100mg BAC ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion.
Dr. Brown made reference to it when he stated that Jimi had “a bit too much to drink”.
Dr. Seifert was caught on video saying Jimi was covered in red wine.
And of course, it’s well known what Dr. Bannister said about it.
And we have what Michael Fairchild says about wine right here:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell2.html
And on that same page we have Dr. Seifert stating TWICE that they did work on Jimi.
Where is Jason’s documentation at of Dr. Seifert & Dr. Brown stated that “no treatments were done” using those exact words. NOWHERE, of course, as there isn’t any such documentation that exists. It’s only a self-decreed fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass. Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown never made any such statements at any time, anywhere.
Jason can’t claim his “no wine” hoax without any documentation stating that using those exact words & there is none to be found anywhere.
Jason doesn’t have any documentation supporting his “no wine” or “no treatment done” hoaxes. Jason has no documentation that uses those exact words. All Jason has to back up his lies of “no wine” and “no treatment done”, is more of Jason’s own lies.
Looks like the crickets are stuck in Jason’s ass — along with all his self-decreed blather.
Another silly childish post from Buster’s more obnoxious multiple personalities character Flyswatter.
“Sister Ivana Sow says
November 13, 2019 at 6:24 pm
Another silly childish post from Buster’s more obnoxious multiple personalities character Flyswatter.”
TRANSLATED: Sister Ivana Sow, as usual, can’t answer the germane points that are made.
Buster and I are not one and the person, dipshits.
Here we have the only phony claims that this wine troll can use for his fake debunked hoax. This is why it’s a joke and nobody takes it seriously. Zero evidence based only on garbage conspiracy theories and the “authors” who peddle them. “Buster” and his alter ego totally embarrasses himself again. He isn’t even trying anymore. Weak.
FLYSWATTER says: Jack Meehan first documented it on Sept. 29, 1970 when Dr. Thurston told Meehan that “a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed” regarding Jimi’s stomach contents.
JASON says: LOL. This phony second quote from Sharon Lawrence in her 2001 fiction book. No documentation of this ever exists..No reports documented in public by Meehan Nothing ever documented by Thurston. Nice try
FLYSWATTER says: Dr. Teare made reference to it in his autopsy report when he made his 100mg BAC ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion.
JASON says: Dr Teare made reference to nothing since he found no evidence of a “massive wine drowning”. Wine was never in play in 1970.
FLYSWATTER says: Dr. Brown made reference to it when he stated that Jimi had “a bit too much to drink”.
JASON says: Dr. Brown was citing the alcohol level that Jimi was drinking from the parties based on the autopsy report..
FLYSWATTER says: Dr. Seifert was caught on video saying Jimi was covered in red wine.
JASON says: Dr. Seiefer also said “he detected no alcohol on Jimi”
FLYSWATTER says: And of course, it’s well known what Dr. Bannister said about it.
JASON says: And Bannister is a convicted fraud who has no documentation of his phony claims. Great source LOL
FLYSWATTER says: And we have what Michael Fairchild says about wine right here:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell2.html
JASON says: We have 2 ambulance men and a police officer who never mentioned wine in their testimony.
FLYSATTER says: And on that same page we have Dr. Seifert stating TWICE that they did work on Jimi.
JASON says: Siefert said a “few minutes” for the formality. Nice try again with your word games.
Out of all of this nonsense we still only have phony claims and zero documented evidence to back any of this up. None exists. This is why this is a joke and a hoax..
FLYSWATTER says: Where is Jason’s documentation at of Dr. Seifert & Dr. Brown stated that “no treatments were done” using those exact words. NOWHERE, of course, as there isn’t any such documentation that exists. It’s only a self-decreed fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass. Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown never made any such statements at any time, anywhere.
JASON says: Since you have a reading comprehension problem you can’t see what these men stated.
“He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” -Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: Siefert clearly stated “there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead” but you are too stupid to understand that nothing more was done for Jimi..
FLYSWATTER says: Jason can’t claim his “no wine” hoax without any documentation stating that using those exact words & there is none to be found anywhere.
JASON says: “No wine hoax” with no documentation? LMAO . No wine is on the official record, moron. You are pushing the wine hoax that doesn’t exist. Thanks again for another laugh.
I already posted what Siefert said many times..
I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.”- Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: That was all Siefert did for Jimi Hendrix cuz he was a dead 6 hour rotting corpse, moron. No phony “treatments” were ever done.
FLYSWATTER says: Jason doesn’t have any documentation supporting his “no wine” or “no treatment done” hoaxes. Jason has no documentation that uses those exact words. All Jason has to back up his lies of “no wine” and “no treatment done”, is more of Jason’s own lies.
JASON says: The official autopsy report states nothing about wine, moron. That’s all the evidence I need. You are a terrible troll. Put some effort into this hoax.
No documentation states anything about “wine” or “procedures” on any Jimi Hendrix medical hospital report or autopsy. All the evidence is on my side and you have nothing to prove otherwise.
I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.”- Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: No “wine treatment”, moron. Siefert clearly states “there was no point in dong anything else cuz he was dead” and you have no documented evidence to prove otherwise. LOL
FLYSWATTER says: Looks like the crickets are stuck in Jason’s ass — along with all his self-decreed blather.
JASON says: They are in yours since a pathetic wine troll like you can only snivel and cry about about imaginary wine that doesn’t exist. A loser troll who can never prove what he claims with real evidence. LOL
TRANSLATED: Jason can’t answer or back up any of his phony “no wine” or “”no treatment done” hoaxes with any documentation. Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder, just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
***”FLYSWATTER says: Jack Meehan first documented it on Sept. 29, 1970 when Dr. Thurston told Meehan that “a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed” regarding Jimi’s stomach contents.
JASON says: LOL. This phony second quote from Sharon Lawrence in her 2001 fiction book. No documentation of this ever exists..No reports documented in public by Meehan Nothing ever documented by Thurston. Nice try”***
Not a try at all — simply a reference, that Jason can only desperately “try” to nay-say with his stupid one-line dismissal of “phony quote”, exhibiting Jason’s wishful thinking. Jason has no proof whatsoever to refute what Meehan said to Sharon & never will have anything other than his self-decreed fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass.
That documentation stands regardless of any of Jason’s blather.
***”FLYSWATTER says: Dr. Teare made reference to it in his autopsy report when he made his 100mg BAC ESTIMATE at the time of Vesparax ingestion.
JASON says: Dr Teare made reference to nothing since he found no evidence of a “massive wine drowning”. Wine was never in play in 1970.”***
Yes, Dr. Teare was referencing the wine he found in Jimi’s stomach, because if there was “no wine”, as Jason claims, then Dr. Teare never makes any such estimate of 100mg of BAC at the time of Vesparax ingestion — simple as that. And Dr. Teare obviously told Dr. Thurston about it & Thurston told Jack Meehan about it on Sept. 29, 1970.
Dr. Brown stated that Jimi had “a bit too much to drink” & Jason still can’t answer “what would make Dr. Brown think Jimi had too much to drink, if there was no wine, as Jason claims”.
Dr. Seifert was recorded on video stating that Jimi was covered in wine by David Kramer. The so-called quote of “no alcohol on Jimi” was never validated or referenced to a credible source and most likely fabricated by the same person that fabricated the ambulance men’s quotes.
***”FLYSWATTER says: Dr. Brown made reference to it when he stated that Jimi had “a bit too much to drink”.
JASON says: Dr. Brown was citing the alcohol level that Jimi was drinking from the parties based on the autopsy report..”***
The autopsy report states Jimi’s blood alcohol content was .005%, meaning that any wine that Jimi may have drank at either Cameron’s or Phillip Harvey’s places was long digested and gone and there is no way possible that Dr. Brown could be citing the autopsy report when he stated “Jimi had a bit too much to drink”. Dr. Brown was citing what he saw of Jimi, when Jimi first arrived at St. Mary Abbots — there is no other possibility and Jason still can’t answer “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had too much to drink, if there was no wine, as Jason claims”.”
***”FLYSWATTER says: And of course, it’s well known what Dr. Bannister said about it.
JASON says: And Bannister is a convicted fraud who has no documentation of his phony claims. Great source LOL”***
Jason is lying. Dr. Bannister was struck off for BILLING ERRORS. There is no documentation to prove that Dr. Bannister has ever made any fraudulent claims regarding the medical condition of one of his patients.
Jason hasn’t provided one shred of proof, with all his blather, to refute Dr. Bannister’s testimony, and Jason never will be able to provide any proof.
***FLYSWATTER says: And we have what Michael Fairchild says about wine right here:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell2.html
JASON says: We have 2 ambulance men and a police officer who never mentioned wine in their testimony.***
But, we have Fairchild stating on that page that they did see it. We do NOT have any statements from the ambulance men stating that there was “no wine” or stating “vomit only”.
***”FLYSWATTER says: And on that same page we have Dr. Seifert stating TWICE that they did work on Jimi.
JASON says: Siefert said a “few minutes” for the formality. Nice try again with your word games.
Out of all of this nonsense we still only have phony claims and zero documented evidence to back any of this up. None exists. This is why this is a joke and a hoax..”***
TRANSLATED: Jason can’t stomach having his own word games turned back on him because Jason gets made to eat for his dinner, his very own pigshit mire that he likes to wallow in.
Jason can’t answer that this “few minutes” Dr. Seifert speaks of, is in fact 30 minutes that is listed as Time of Treatment: 11:45PM to 12:15PM and this same time frame is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book “Inside the Experience”, which was most likely gotten from that hospital report.
The coroner’s form clearly states “Unable to Resuscitate” which means they did try to resuscitate Jimi and failed.
The only phony claims are Jason’s “no wine” and “no treatment done” hoaxes and Jason knows that he can’t provide any documentation to back up his hoaxes.
***”FLYSWATTER says: Where is Jason’s documentation at of Dr. Seifert & Dr. Brown stated that “no treatments were done” using those exact words. NOWHERE, of course, as there isn’t any such documentation that exists. It’s only a self-decreed fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass. Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown never made any such statements at any time, anywhere.
JASON says: Since you have a reading comprehension problem you can’t see what these men stated.
“He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” -Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: Siefert clearly stated “there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead” but you are too stupid to understand that nothing more was done for Jimi..”***
And Jason once again proves his illiteracy & that he can only take what is said by Seifert and rip it out of context. Seifert is simply stating that Jimi could not be saved. Seifert never states that “no treatments were done”. Seifert says not once, but TWICE that they did work on Jimi and even used the words “After we worked on Jimi” and the hospital report stating ‘Time of Treatment: 11:45PM to 12:15PM’ that Seifert signed off on bears this out and proves Jason is ripping out of context what Seifert said and that Jason just continues to wallow in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
If there was no treatment done, then Seifert would have never used the words “After we worked on Jimi”, and none of Jason’s blather or Jason’s own word games can get around that fact.
***”FLYSWATTER says: Jason can’t claim his “no wine” hoax without any documentation stating that using those exact words & there is none to be found anywhere.
JASON says: “No wine hoax” with no documentation? LMAO . No wine is on the official record, moron. You are pushing the wine hoax that doesn’t exist. Thanks again for another laugh.”***
Wrong again, and Jason knows Dr. Teare was referencing the wine in his autopsy report, because if there was “no wine”, as Jason claims, then Dr. Teare never makes any such estimate of 100mg of BAC at the time of Vesparax ingestion, nor would Dr. Teare have written that into his autopsy report.
In chapter 11 of Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”, Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that Jimi’s lungs were filled with fluid when he arrived at the hospital. Where did Dr. Crompton get that information if it wasn’t documented somewhere?
Also, how did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as Jason claims?
ANSWER: There had to be treatment and a full resuscitation attempt made for that to occur and proves Jason’s “no treatment was done” to be a hoax.
Of course, what’s really laughable is that Jason continually can’t answer these points and just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
***””FLYSWATTER says: Looks like the crickets are stuck in Jason’s ass — along with all his self-decreed blather.
JASON says: They are in yours since a pathetic wine troll like you can only snivel and cry about about imaginary wine that doesn’t exist. A loser troll who can never prove what he claims with real evidence. LOL***
Real evidence was just provided courtesy of Dr. Crompton and Kathy Etchingham. What there is no evidence for, is Jason having any substance between Jason’s ears other than the same substance located in Jason’s large intestine — namely a large quantity of STOOL !!
Still no evidence of anything from this troll.
Only word games and same repeated bogus claims.
Each post shows you have nothin’.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 14, 2019 at 3:11 pm
Still no refutation of evidence put in front of me (Jason) & all that I (Jason) can do is keep wallowing in my own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
All that I (Jason) have are word games and same repeated bogus claims.
Each post shows that I (Jason) have nothin’.”
^^FIXED.
Still nothin’ from this wine troll.
All Buster etc., needs to do is sit back and destroy all the forensics that have gone before to try and prove that Jimi was murdered. None of it is Buster’s work all has been done for him. He ticks off, on his imaginary board, all the items that disprove the murder scene one by one until all he has left are those things that fit neatly into the murder scenario in Buster’s imagination. It really doesn’t matter whether all of this took place or not but Buster will make sure that you believe it did. What moron would believe, for example, that a resuscitation attempt was made on a corpse that had been long dead or still make accusations of a murder when the murderer was in another country instead of a Notting Hill hotel room waterboarding Jimi with copious amounts of red wine. How could this amount of wine exist if a murder did not take place or was not sighted by the doctor performing the autopsy Dr. Teare. Then we have a long dead corpse producing five bottles of wine extracted by a doctor who thinks it’s O.K to perform procedures on the long dead who have no hope of survival knowing full well this is illegal. Dr. Seifert did the minimum by just pounding Jimi’s chest so he could establish time of death and then waited for Gerry Stickells to identify the body. This sounds the more likely scenario given that Jimi had been dead for hours before the ambulance was called. Jimi was covered in vomit which was brown and black in colour and not red wine to suggest death from anything other than an overdose of barbiturates which caused an inhalation of vomit while he was unconscious on top of a bed fully clothed. Tin foil hatters always pursue the more suspicious and unlikely scenario because it satisfies and fuels their peculiar mindset-locating and identifying evidence where there is none to be found. As Jason says “ a loser troll who can never prove what he claims with real evidence.LOL”
“Sister Ivana Sow says:
November 13, 2019 at 8:45 pm
Dr. Seifert did the minimum by just pounding Jimi’s chest so he could establish time of death”
I’ve seen Sister Ivana Sow make this statement multiple times & it just shows what a total retard she is & that if brains were made out cotton, then Sister Ivana Sow wouldn’t have enough to make a Kotex for a pissant.
And this, in addition to not being able to string together a coherent sentence, in any of her posts.
Since when does any doctor pound on a patients chest to try and establish a time of death? Sister Ivana Sow is totally full of shit & if she had taken the time to read Janis Joplin’s autopsy report in full, then Sister Ivana Sow would know that it is common practice for a liver temperature reading to be taken to try and establish a time of death.
Pounding on a patient’s chest isn’t going to tell any doctor jack-shit as far as establishing a time of death. Pounding on a patient’s chest is done to try & get a patient’s heart to start beating — hence Seifert did this because as he stated the heart monitor was flat.
Is Sister Ivana Sow really stupid enough to think that Dr. Seifert came away thinking “Jimi’s been dead for 6+ hours, no point in doing anything else” after pounding on Jimi’s chest a couple of times? Well, apparently Sister Ivana Sow is stupid enough to think that, as evidenced by her statement.
This sow has got the brain of a pissant.
Dr Teare never established a time of death in his autopsy…That is proof of a cover-up…He knew that if he did his training would force him to the same forensic conclusions I came to…They also knew they would have to go ask questions of Monika and the others that they didn’t want to know the answers to…
What a stupid idiot you are. It doesn’t really matter what you write as your posts are becoming more and more ridiculous. Do I really need to spell out every little detail like a fill the gaps activity for children. You seem to have a problem with reading and comprehension. But you certainly have fallen for the dumb rants of a hoaxer like the gullible fool you are. No amount of insults will change the fact that Jimi was not murdered however the doctors could see that Jimi had been dead for a while. Try and read what the evidence is before you write your dubious posts. Who would be trying to resuscitate a long dead corpse like you are trying to make us believe. I’m too smart to fall for your ludicrous posts. And stop posting under your many pseudonyms as it is obvious who you are Buster etc., you are a silly pedantic fool.
“Sister Ivana Sow says:
November 13, 2019 at 8:45 pm
As Jason says “ a loser troll who can never prove what he claims with real evidence.LOL”
Great self-description of both Jason and Ivana, as neither have proven their fake claims with any documented evidence or credible reference sources. Jason and Ivana only provide self-decreed fabrications that they pull out of their asses.
Ivana obviously isn’t too bright…Time of death is a basic determination of all autopsies…They avoided it with Jimi because they were trying to prevent people from going and looking in to the circumstances…If they claimed a time of death then people would have tried to prove or disprove it, which would lead to people doing what Kathy did and discovering it was bullshit and that Jimi died much earlier than claimed…Kathy and Fairchild were not detectives but they managed to quickly expose the true time of death with some simple investigation…
Ivana stupidly evades the point…This is proof of a cover-up because the autopsy and Inquest were avoiding committing to anything that would spark the interest of people to go look in to it…They not only avoided the time of death but they also avoided the 5 bottles of wine that Thurston had obviously been informed of as well…
Jason is doing what all desperate trolls do when they know they’ve been cornered by the evidence…They always retreat to the last desperate ditch of “You have no evidence or documentation”…It’s pathetic, really…Anyone can see all the points they couldn’t answer…
Good point Flyswatter…We’ve exposed so much good evidence for the wine and Jimi’s murder that I can’t remember it all…Dr Crompton told Kathy that Jimi wasn’t breathing when he got to hospital because his lungs were filled with fluid…Crompton was Dr Teare’s successor…Dr Crompton said Jimi’s lungs were filled with only fluid and no vomit…Gee, I wonder what that fluid was?…Maybe Jason will enter another long trolling post in his efforts to not answer that?…
I have to disagree on one point…I don’t think Teare passed the information about the stomach full of wine to Thurston…I think it originated from Siefert…The reason I say that is because Thurston said an unusually large amount of red wine was witnessed in Jimi’s stomach…That had to be at St Mary’s and not at the autopsy…
In any case, we’ve already won this “debate” when Jason refused to answer where Platt got the “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15” from?…Mitch was married to Dee Mitchell at the time and Dee was right in the middle of helping Kathy investigate…Obviously Dee had found the Hospital Report and given it to Platt…The reason Platt got the exact times correct is obviously because Dee had given him access to the original…
Jason has been asked to answer this repeatedly but he refuses…
That means he concedes the debate…
Regardless of where Dr. Thurston got his info from, the question still remains:
Where did Dr. Crompton get his info from regarding Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid, if there was no documentation, as Jason tries to decree? This proves that Jason has no clue or proof regarding what was actually documented.
The fluid, of course, consisted of mainly red wine that Dr. Bannister, Dr. Seifert, Dr. Brown, Dr. Teare, and Dr. Thurston all made reference to.
And of course, we know that Jason has no documentation to back up his “no wine” or “no treatment was done” hoaxes.
Hilarious how this wine troll continues to destroy his phony hoax. This is pure comedy gold.
FLYSWATTER says: And of course, we know that Jason has no documentation to back up his “no wine” or “no treatment was done” hoaxes.
JASON says: No documentation exists of any “wine removal” or “procedures”, moron. If you had any documents, you would have already posted it instead of trolling with phony claims. You got nothin’ and you never will.
“JASON says:
November 14, 2019 at 3:06 pm
Hilarious how I (Jason) continue to wallow in my own pigshit mire of denial of reality
and can’t answer or refute the points or documented evidence that destroy my phony hoaxes. This is pure comedy gold.”
^^FIXED !!
Here is the documented evidence Jason speaks of, but tries to pretend doesn’t exist:
*****Jason knows Dr. Teare was referencing the wine in his autopsy report, because if there was “no wine”, as Jason claims, then Dr. Teare never makes any such estimate of 100mg of BAC at the time of Vesparax ingestion, nor would Dr. Teare have written that into his autopsy report.
In chapter 11 of Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”, Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that Jimi’s lungs were filled with fluid when he arrived at the hospital. Where did Dr. Crompton get that information if it wasn’t documented somewhere?
Also, how did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as Jason claims?******
This troll Buster/Flyswatter, who talks with himself, has lost his phony hoax since day one, since he was unable to produce any documented evidence for his phony claims.
He claims Dr. Teare was involved in a “cover up” after Teare’s forensic analysis refutes Buster/Flyswatter’s phony hoax. But Buster/Flyswatter has no real evidence to prove his phony claims of a “cover up”.
Buster/Flyswatter claims hospital documents exist of a phony “treatment” cuz he read it in a book. Yet, he can’t produce these documents when asked cuz he is a fraud.
Then he makes up more garbage stories about wine in his crazy head with still no evidence. He is a fraud.
If Dee Mitchell and Kathy Etchingham saw a hospital report of “treatments” they would have released it to the public as evidence and used it for their investigation. Buster/Flyswatter has no answer for that. No “treatments” ever happened cuz Jimi was a 6 hour dead rotting corpse and Siefert told Kathy he didn’t do anything besides hook Jimi up to the monitor and pound his heart twice. That is documented testimony that can’t be refuted. But we have Brian Doyle aka Buster/Flyswatter claiming there were “procedures” done on a 6 hour long dead rotting corpse. Only a lunatic would claim that. Yet, Brian Doyle aka Buster/Flyswatter can’t produce any documented evidence of these “procedures” he claims happened.
All the evidence against Doyle aka Buster/Flyswatter is etched in stone forever. It is up to him to produce real evidence to overturn the offical record. But he never does, except to argue his bogus debunked theories. He has nothin’, that’s why he can’t do it, and always evades when he is asked to produce real documented evidence. No evidence exists for this troll, so instead he makes it up in his crazy head. That’s pathetic.
For 10 years Doyle has offered us the same phony claims and theories with new bogus stories made up in his crazy head. He hasn’t even scratched the surface with his phony case as he repeats debunked lies from Tappy Wright, Sharon Lawrence, and Fraud Bannister. 10 years from now he will still be repeating this same nonsense as it will be 20 years he wasted being at the same starting point still with nothin’. That is hilarious!
A real investigation requires facts, documented evidence, testimony, and real forensics. Buster only has fake claims he reads from books and the stories he makes up in his crazy head. Buster has no real evidence to provide, so he only wants to engage in a “debate” based on his own made up fake claims that he has the answers to. This is all he can do since he has nothin’.
A real researcher and expert would easily be able to provide documents for their case. Brian Doyle aka Buster/Flyswatter has no documents to provide for his phony claims. That makes him a wine troll loser who can never back up what he claims. He just wants to argue nonsense in long winded posts typing in an “authoritative tone” pretending to sound knowledgeable. After you see past his smoke and mirrors you can easily see he has no evidence, only words and made up crap he tries to sell. Doyle is an empty suit collecting dust on a sham theory.
10 years and counting and this wine troll still can’t produce documented evidence to prove his phony claims. All he wants to do is “debate” nonsense. You see folks, a wine troll never has any evidence to post, only bluster and hot air. And that’s exactly what Brian Doyle aka Buster/Flyswatter is, a troll who has been banned from many sites and forums.
^^TRANSLATED: Jason can only continue to wallow in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality and this is what lying-denying pigbreeders like Jason do when they can’t answer documented evidence put in front of them, such as was done regarding what Dr. Crompton told Kathy about the lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital, and then having the autopsy report 400ml of fluid in one of the lungs 3 days later.
Jason know this debunks his “no treatment was done” hoax, so Jason is left only to wallow even more still in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality with long-winded blather that he has no documentation or credible reference sources to back up his filibuster. All anyone gets is the same self-decreed fabrications that Jason keeps pulling out of his ass.
FLYSWATTER says: ^^TRANSLATED: Jason can only continue to wallow in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality and this is what lying-denying pigbreeders like Jason do when they can’t answer documented evidence put in front of them, such as was done regarding what Dr. Crompton told Kathy about the lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital, and then having the autopsy report 400ml of fluid in one of the lungs 3 days later.
Jason know this debunks his “no treatment was done” hoax, so Jason is left only to wallow even more still in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality with long-winded blather that he has no documentation or credible reference sources to back up his filibuster. All anyone gets is the same self-decreed fabrications that Jason keeps pulling out of his ass.
JASON says: More lame words but still no documented evidence of wine recorded at the hospital LOL.
10 years and counting and still nothin’
Hi Ivana,
I find it hilarious that “Buster” the wine hoaxer is demanding that we show him evidence. All of our evidence is already officially documented in history and proves Jimi died from a barbiturate overdose. Our evidence will forever always debunk the alternate phony claims he uses each time he posts.
“Buster” needs to show us his evidence to state his phony case. He is inarguably ignorant on the whole premise of his phony hoax. All the real evidence of Jimi’s death is documented with forensics being forever etched in stone and can never be overturned. “Buster” is presenting us with his bogus alternate viewpoint of his “Hendrix Murder Hoax”. It is up to him to provide real documented evidence to make his case and challenge the offical verdict. “Buster” needs to provide the documented evidence that supports his phony theory cuz all the real documented evidence refutes his phony claims and always will. Instead of him demanding answers to his bogus made up questions, don’t you think he should show us real proof for what he claims?
All “Buster” does is blow hot air with long winded rants claiming all this stuff happened but never provides any proof for his phony claims. He types in an “authoritative tone” pretending he is an “expert” but can never show off his expertise with any documented evidence. See, a real expert could do that, but “Buster” cannot, since he will never have any real evidence to provide.
For 10 years “Buster” has failed miserably and hasn’t even put a scratch on the surface. All he has to show in the 10 years was phony claims from fraud book authors like Tappy Wright, Sharon Lawrence, and other dubious writers who are in it for the money. He also invested his time promoting a 3 count fraud ex Doctor Bannister who lost his medical license for fraud and medical malpractice talking about his fake wild stories about wine. Other than that, “Buster” has nothing except for the absurd stories he makes up in his crazy head which are automatically debunked. Any fool can read a book and claim he is an “expert” and that is what “our friend” Buster the clown does. He pretends the conspiracies theories from the frauds he reads makes him an “expert”, if he reads it enough, while he parrots the nonsense on various forums in which he ended up being banned from for trolling and abuse.
Here is a perfect example of the trolling “Buster” does as he makes up total b.s. stories to to push his phony hoax.
BUSTER says: As the underling, Bannister probably wrote up the report in the doctor’s rest area after they failed to save Jimi…
JASON says: We all know this is b.s. since Jimi was already dead for 6 hours and was stiff and starting to rot. “Buster” pathetically and pathologically lies saying the doctors “failed to save Jimi”. Everybody reading this is just shaking their heads or laughing extremely hard. It’s also disgusting that a deranged troll would think up this garbage to promote a hoax. Jimi was already dead for 6 hours so he couldn’t be “saved” and Siefert clearly tells us that. But this wine troll “Buster” ignores it and makes up complete garbage.
“Buster” also makes up another new garbage lie saying Bannister “probably” wrote up a “report” in a doctor’s rest area. The word “probably” is a dead giveaway that he is lying since he made this up in his crazy head. No “report” from Bannister ever exists. This is “Buster” the hoaxers fraudulent way of trying to claim a report exists. All he has to do is invent a fake one in his crazy head as he tells us another fake story. This guy is crazy as a loon wanting Jimi Hendrix to be “murdered” as he makes up his own bogus stories. What a nut.
Ivana, don’t you think since “Buster” is claiming this “report” from Bannister exists that “Buster” should produce this report as his “evidence”? Aren’t you tired of his phony claims and bluster? Don’t you want this guy to finally provide documented evidence for his all phony claims? It’s about time that “Buster” shows us proof instead of his clownish trolling claims of nothing.
Hi Jason. I’ve noticed that too about the word “probably” creeping more and more into his fairytale rants. He knows full well that no evidence will ever exist for his phoney claims since they are a pack of lies. I like to describe Buster as an obnoxious serial troll who tries to get into every possible thread to spread his bogus account of what happened to Jimi. The thing that makes me laugh the most is that the wine escaped the gaze of Dr. Teare during the autopsy and all he reported was inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. The doctors aren’t allowed to touch the corpse of a DOA before it’s handed over to the coroner so the wine magically disappeared. I’m still waiting for the stat dec from Bannister and I’m sure I’II be waiting for ages. The stuff that Buster etc comes out with he gets from fraud books like you said Jason and not from any reliable source. He manipulates the real findings to suit his murder scenario saying that everyone was coerced into changing the findings or their stories. This is all coming from Buster’s over active imagination and not from known official documents. He has wasted years of his life trying to prove a murder took place when all the evidence points to accidental death. He wants Jimi to be a victim of murder at the hands of distrustful people rather than someone who unknowingly overdosed on a toxic dose of barbiturates as the official report stated. How could the doctors then have possibly saved someone who had been dead for hours when brought into casualty like Buster etc says. Crazy made up stuff!
A sure sign of someone who is losing a debate is they start analyzing semantics and switching the debate from the evidence to examinations of language…
You’ve already lost your phony hoax since you can’t produce valid documentation for the phony “procedures” you claim.
Trolls only want to “debate” nonsense. Serious researchers provide real documents.
So, where is documentation of these phony “procedures” on Hendrix you claim happened?
Go on big shot, post ’em.
I guess the debate is pretty much over because Jason has defaulted by refusing to answer evidence…
Dr Crompton inherited Jimi’s autopsy sheets because he was Dr Teare’s successor…So something made him tell Kathy Etchingham that Jimi wasn’t breathing when he arrived at the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid…Dr Crompton was one of England’s top pathologists so he used his words carefully…His statement proves that the dry vomit Jason has been lying over was actually wine…Very simply, Crompton witnessed mention of the wine Dr Bannister spoke of and is therefore yet another corroborator of it…Jason seems to be having trouble answering this…This also corroborates Thurston…The way the rules of evidence work is Crompton trumps the ambulance men because he had witnessed mention of the wine after the hard plug of vomit was removed at St Mary’s…
Jason refuses to answer where Platt got the 11:45 to 12:15 treatment time?…Mitch’s wife Dee Mitchell was actively involved in accessing the hospital records at the time Mitch’s book was written…Since Platt got the exact treatment time correct that means he had to have gotten the Hospital Report from Dee…Kathy had also gotten the autopsy record at this time…Since Platt’s half hour treatment time obviously came from the Hospital Report, and matches Bannister’s claimed half hour, we can assume Siefert lied and the treatment time was the entered half hour he signed-off on on the Report…Again, Jason seems to be having trouble answering this…
Lastly, Dr Siefert is the final corroborating witness for the wine when he said “Jimi was covered in red wine” on tape in the 1990’s…Since Jimi only had a trace blood alcohol content, that wine Jimi was soaked in means it was wine that spilled over when wine was being forced down his throat…If Jimi was covered in wine at St Mary’s he was covered in wine at the Samarkand so we have a straight sweep of Jason and his bullshit…Jason is stupid because he isn’t afraid to set himself up for embarrassment when that tape comes out…
Jason avoided answering all these proven facts so he defaults and concedes the debate…That how the rules of debate work…No need to waste any further time on him…
Yes, Buster, it is interesting to note that…….
Dr. Crompton made the statement to Kathy about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid in 1991, and yet we know that Dr. Bannister didn’t write his letter to Shapiro and reveal himself until January 9, 1992 & this information is found in Tony Brown’s book “Hendrix – The Final Days” and it can also be seen here:
http://woodstockhendrix.gobot.com/about.html
These liar-deniers will never be able to answer the question of “how did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as they claim?”.
Another phony commentary from a wine troll.
You claim these phony hospital reports exist. So, post them. If Dee had access to them as you claim, then she would have released them along with all the witness testimony that came out. That means Kathy would have seen them too, but she never even talked about it.
Go on, Mr. Big Shot….post these “treatments” that were performed on a 6 hour long dead rotting Jimi Hendrix corpse. I want to see them. Quit stalling with your question games. You had 10 years to produce this stuff. Do it!
Jason has already had it explained to him that the Hospital Report he calls “phony” had to exist because there could not be no hospital report…Because Jason is a sick troll who is just here to deny everything he sees, and Justin is letting him get away with it, Jason is getting away with suggesting there was no Hospital Report when reality dictates that every patient that came in to St Mary’s had to have a Hospital Report…This is the kind of unbanned asshole that we’re dealing with in Jason…
Keep in mind that in his trolling counter Jason still hasn’t answered the basic question of how did Platt manage to repeat the exact 11:45 to 12:15 that was entered on the Hospital Report if he hadn’t gotten it from the report itself?…Jason’s position is that Platt somehow managed a perfect guess or, even better, was yet another of a long line of hoaxers that only Jason in his skeptical wisdom has managed to expose…It couldn’t be as simple as Dee Mitchell being actively involved in accessing the hospital records at the time who showed the Hospital Report to Platt and he accurately repeated it in the book…
Jason is ignorant and learned about this subject from us for the first time in this comments section when he turned his trolling attention towards it…Because of that he isn’t aware of Dee’s background and how she turned against Kathy half way through the investigation and took the side of Monika and the British government…Dee was not the only person gotten to in this investigation and Jason should check out her true background…She has all the earmarks of a CIA spook sent in to penetrate the targeted individuals like was originally done to Jimi…This roaring asshole troll Jason will mock and ridicule this but, as he has shown in every post he makes, he won’t post anything to refute it or answer the evidence for it…
Kathy has that report…She’s pulled in and shut down because she realized she bit off more than she could chew and uncovered a monster…Kathy was very good at exposing Monika’s lies but she lacked in forensic skill and the will to pursue the evidence all the way…I hear it was because her investigation caused friction with her doctor husband…She won’t go past Monika but the most important evidence lay past Monika..
When you post that Monika also told of a long treatment time in her accounts our resident troll Jason ignores it…Jason also contemptuously ignores Flyswatter’s point that Crompton told Kathy Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…Since Teare listed the remnants of that fluid after it was removed at hospital Jason’s own postings prove it would have taken a half hour to remove that wine and try to ventilate Jimi…Crompton told Kathy Jimi’s lungs were full of FLUID and not the dry vomit trolling Jason has been taunting us with with his trolling lies…Jason doesn’t answer this because he knows it means the jig is up on his trolling…
Jason is also a hypocrite because he poses himself as a demander of evidence but he himself offers the least in the form of never producing any Hospital Report himself to back up Siefert’s lie that Jimi was only treated a few minutes…Jason is a seeker of darkness and goes right to the darkest areas of corruption to hide his lies and deception in…Jason is a servant of Satan, lies, and deception…
“Buster the clown” aka Brian Doyle is running faster than an Olympic sprinter away from the fact that he needs to produce documents for these phony procedures he claims.
“Buster the clown” knows they don’t exist, so he trolls instead, posting garbage trying to hide from it. Then he cries for me to b banned cuz I exposed his hoax. A patheic troll who’s been banned from many many sites all over.
You claim these phony hospital reports exist “Buster”. So, post them. If Dee had access to them as you claim, then she would have released them along with all the witness testimony that came out. That means Kathy would have seen them too, but she never even talked about it.
Go on, Mr. Big Shot….post these “treatments” that were performed on a 6 hour long dead rotting Jimi Hendrix corpse. I want to see them. Quit stalling with your question games. You had 10 years to produce this stuff. Do it!
BUSTER says: Jason has already had it explained to him that the Hospital Report he calls “phony” had to exist because there could not be no hospital report…Because Jason is a sick troll who is just here to deny everything he sees, and Justin is letting him get away with it, Jason is getting away with suggesting there was no Hospital Report when reality dictates that every patient that came in to St Mary’s had to have a Hospital Report…This is the kind of unbanned asshole that we’re dealing with in Jason…
JASON says: Jimi Hendrix was bought in dead to St. Mary Abbots hospital. Everything about his condition would be documented in a hospital report. Everything they did for him would be documented as well. That is what a hospital does.
All the b.s..you claim is a hoax which is why there is no documentation of it.
This fraud can’t produce any reports of the bogus “wine” and “treatments” he claims cuz none of this ever happened. That’s the reason why Bluster blows hot air instead of producing results. Bluster know he can’t do it. So he rages like a nut a demands that I get banned for exposing him.
The simple reason that you are fraud is, cuz if you had any solid evidence for your phony claims, you would have already posted it by now. Instead you cry like a baby demanding me to be banned cuz I exposed your hoax. You are pathetic.
You’ve been banned from almost every site you infiltrated with the garbage you peddle and your abusive posts.
BUSTER says: Keep in mind that in his trolling counter Jason still hasn’t answered the basic question of how did Platt manage to repeat the exact 11:45 to 12:15 that was entered on the Hospital Report if he hadn’t gotten it from the report itself?…Jason’s position is that Platt somehow managed a perfect guess or, even better, was yet another of a long line of hoaxers that only Jason in his skeptical wisdom has managed to expose…It couldn’t be as simple as Dee Mitchell being actively involved in accessing the hospital records at the time who showed the Hospital Report to Platt and he accurately repeated it in the book…
JASON says: Keep in mind that if these phony reports existed Dee Mitchell would have released it to the public. Siefert debunked these phony claims and not one single person has ever released these “reports” in 49 years. No reports exist that’s why.
BUSTER says: Jason is ignorant and learned about this subject from us for the first time in this comments section when he turned his trolling attention towards it…Because of that he isn’t aware of Dee’s background and how she turned against Kathy half way through the investigation and took the side of Monika and the British government…Dee was not the only person gotten to in this investigation and Jason should check out her true background…She has all the earmarks of a CIA spook sent in to penetrate the targeted individuals like was originally done to Jimi…This roaring asshole troll Jason will mock and ridicule this but, as he has shown in every post he makes, he won’t post anything to refute it or answer the evidence for it…
JASON says: Where is your evidence that Monika Dannemann, a drugged out 23 year old groupie, who painted was a “spook”? Just more b.s. this fraud makes up in his crazy head. I know more than you do, you clown, which is why I debunk everything you post with ease.
BUSTER says: Kathy has that report…She’s pulled in and shut down because she realized she bit off more than she could chew and uncovered a monster…Kathy was very good at exposing Monika’s lies but she lacked in forensic skill and the will to pursue the evidence all the way…I hear it was because her investigation caused friction with her doctor husband…She won’t go past Monika but the most important evidence lay past Monika..
JASON says: LOL. More made up crap by this wine troll in his crazy head. Not one single shred of evidence can this nut produce to prove this claim. This is why “Buster” was banned at many sites and everybody laughs at him at those sites.
BUSTER says: When you post that Monika also told of a long treatment time in her accounts our resident troll Jason ignores it…Jason also contemptuously ignores Flyswatter’s point that Crompton told Kathy Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…Since Teare listed the remnants of that fluid after it was removed at hospital Jason’s own postings prove it would have taken a half hour to remove that wine and try to ventilate Jimi…Crompton told Kathy Jimi’s lungs were full of FLUID and not the dry vomit trolling Jason has been taunting us with with his trolling lies…Jason doesn’t answer this because he knows it means the jig is up on his trolling…
JASON says: So, “Buster” now believes Monika when it suits him….that is called being a hypocrite.
“Lungs and a stomach full of wine” like this troll claims, would take hours to suction out with the small tubing that Bannister said he was using. That is a fact. That’s why Bannister is lying and is a hoax. No way could you do all that in a half hour.
Fluid is not wine you troll, and if Bannister performed “treatments” to sucks out “wine” as you claim, there would be no fluid for Dr Teare to examine…..oops….debunked again.
Also, no wine was detected anywhere in Jimi’s body during forensic analysis by Dr. Teare…….debunked yet again.
BUSTER says: Jason is also a hypocrite because he poses himself as a demander of evidence but he himself offers the least in the form of never producing any Hospital Report himself to back up Siefert’s lie that Jimi was only treated a few minutes…Jason is a seeker of darkness and goes right to the darkest areas of corruption to hide his lies and deception in…Jason is a servant of Satan, lies, and deception…
JASON says: Sorry wine troll. You are making the phony claims of “wine and treatments” so it’s up to you to produce this evidence.
It’s already been determined that Jimi died from a drug overdose. You are trying to overturn the results with your fake hoax. Produce some evidence Mr. Big Shot.
The burden of proof is on you to produce evidence for your phony claims.
Get some mental help for your Satan fetish.
10 years and counting and you still got nothin’.
and you never will.
Dr Bannister is a man full of contradictions. He states that Jimi had been was dead for a while when he was brought into casualty yet he thought it was OK to spend thirty minutes trying to revive a patient who was beyond help and could not have possibly been revived. This account sounds incredibly suspicious. Dr. Seifert then says in one interview that they pounded Jimi’s chest for a few moments as a mere formality not to resuscitate him but in order to establish an official time of death while waiting for Gerry Stickells to identify the body in the minutes remaining. Dr. Bannister has been given a lot of credibility in this story for whatever reason but does he really deserve it. Treatment time could mean a number of things like waiting in a cubicle to be seen by a doctor for instance or intermittent treatment. All the doctors observed and noticed that Jimi had been dead for a while so what the hell would have warranted an half hour resuscitation attempt. What exactly would have been the purpose, reason or outcome of this futile activity. Dr. Crompton clearly stated that Jimi’s liver was so congested that he could not have survived; no where does he mention that the wine caused Jimi’s death so it’s fair to say that the wine is irrelevant as it did not directly cause Jimi’s death the barbiturate levels did causing him to choke on his own vomit. This was the outcome of the autopsy performed by Dr.Teare back in 1970. None of the doctors, ambulance officers or pathologists ever considered or suspected that Jimi was murdered. This dumb waterboarding story was concocted by Tappy Wright and given credence by gullible tin foil hatters who love nothing more than a juicy murder to sink their crooked teeth into.
(Hi friends! Everybody agrees (except for a very small percentage of morons) that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose like the official record states. All the documented testimony and forensic evidence proves it and it is etched in stone forever in history. Hoaxers will try to deny it with all their debunked phony claims and made up theories but they never have any evidence to prove their bogus case. They can forever spout off nonsense while their bogus claims will always amount to nothing not being able to ever overturn the real documented results. These three main points will always refute their bogus nonsense forever. Nothing they can ever claim will ever change it. Their futile efforts will always end up in failure cuz they have not one single shred of evidence to prove otherwise. Here is the first of the 3 main points that will always destroy their fake wine claims.)
“The Three Main Points That Always Destroys The Phony Wine Claims And The Hendrix Murder Hoax”
Point Number One
By Jason
Real evidence and forensics will always be on our side since it has already been documented and investigated. Any time a hoaxer attempts to push their phony claims as “evidence”, all we have to do is easily refute it with the real evidence that demolishes the garbage they peddle. We’ve been doing that for months already and their hoax has been exposed as a fraud. They have no answers and can’t provide any real documented evidence for their phony claims. That’s why they can only engage in petty arguments and character attacks while making up bogus claims since they have nothing to prove. Their scam has failed miserably and they are left looking like fools using any nonsense to still cling to their failed theory. It’s hilarious but it’s also pathetic as they show the world how desperate they are. It provides pure comedy gold as we just sit back and laugh.
The first main point that destroys their hoax is the documented testimony of Dr. Siefert. Siefert was the main doctor who tended to Hendrix in the reresuscitation room. Hoaxers try to claim phony “treatments” and “procedures” were performed on Hendrix at the hospital, so they can make their phony wine and “murder” claim. Dr. Siefert shoots down their hoax as he explicitly told Katy Etchingham that he did nothing for Jimi Hendrix since Jimi was a 6 hour dead corpse that could never be brought back to life.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Siefert just told us in his documented testimony that Hendrix was already dead when he hooked him up to the monitor. The monitor was flat proving that Hendrix was dead and nothing could be done for him. Siefert then said he “pounded Jimi’s heart a couple of times but there was no point in doing anything else”. Doctors do not spend anymore time on a person when the monitor goes flat and the person exhibits no signs of life. Jimi was already dead for 6 hours and was already decomposing so no more attempts would be made.
Hoaxers don’t like hearing this from Siefert, and rightfully so, since it destroys their phony murder hoax. They need the tales of fake procedures of a “wine removal” so they either call Siefert a liar or ridiculously claim a “cover up” without having any evidence to prove those bogus claims.
Siefert told his testimony before all the main phony wine claims started to surface so we know Siefert was giving an accurate statement regarding what happened. Also, Dr. Bob Brown backs Siefert up when he stated “no revival was possible” since Hendrix was already dead for 6 hours and no attempt was made.
Wine hoaxers try to discredit Siefert by pointing to quotes in books about tales of “long procedures”. Well, we have the head doctor who was there tending to Hendrix telling the world no procedures were performed and then we have an author who wasn’t there trying to sell a book. Siefert who was there, knows the exact details and the author never does provide any real documented evidence to prove his claims. No documented evidence ever exists of these “treatments” happening which is why these hoaxers will always be forver destroyed with their phony claims.
“We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Siefert tells the world that Jimi was only worked on for a few minutes. Not the fake half hour procedures wine hoaxers pathetically try to claim for their hoax. Siefert knocks down all those phony claims here. Jimi was already dead for 6 hours so there would be no point in working on him for a long time. And this is how it would be in any hospital around the world. Hoaxers want to portray doctors doing weird medical procedures on a dead 6 hour Jimi Hendrix corpse with their science fiction tales of a fake “murder”. They have no evidence and this doctor debunks their hoax. This also angers the wine trolls so they ignore this documented testimony and push their phony claims instead. Yes it is fraudulent, but they have nothing for evidence, so they just waste their time promoting a farce like Buster the clown has done for 10 years with nothing to show for it.
“I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.” – Dr. Siefert
Siefert tells it like it is by telling the wine trolls Hendrix was already dead and it was too late to do any “procedures” to help him. These jokers need to face the facts and realize this destroys their hoax since the head doctor refutes their nonsense and they have no documentation to prove there was procedures done.
These hoaxers want you to live in an alternate reality where only phony claims exist and real facts don’t. The problem for them is that all their phony claims end up being refuted with the facts.
Hospitals document everything and they don’t perform work on people without recorded reports of what was done. Hospitals also don’t do long procedures on a dead corpse that’s been dead for 6 hours awaiting an autopsy. Call up any hospital in the UK or the world and they will tell you the same thing.
Kathy Etchingham did a real investigation gathering facts and evidence. Not one of the men she got testimony from ever gave any indication that Hendrix was “murdered” or confirmed any of the phony claims used by wine hoaxers. In fact, their testimony debunks their hoax since no wine was witnessed at the flat and they all confirm the offical record of a drug overdose. All they accomplished was they proved Monika Dannemann was lying and hoaxers still use her lies in their failed “murder theory”. That’s why this whole thing is a joke.
Dr. Siefert in his documented testimony squashes all the fake claims as he testified that nothing was done for Hendrix besides hooking him up to the monitor and pounding his heart twice since Jimi was already dead for 6 hours.
Any basic attempt at resuscitation will be listed as “unable to resuscitate” when an attempt was made. Hendrix was dead for 6 hours so he was unable to resuscitate. That does not mean “long procedures” were performed.
Wine hoaxers like to push fake claims and theories but can never produce any documented evidence for their claims. They don’t have any evidence to prove any “procedures” were performed on Hendrix and they never will since no procedures were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix. No documentation exists since nothing was done. That’s why their phony hoax will always be destroyed by this first main point. Their phony words can’t refute documented testimony cuz they have no documented evidence to ever refute it. That’s why they will always fail. Ask Buster the clown….10 years and counting and still nothin’.
^^TRANSLATED: Jason can only continue to wallow in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality and this is what lying-denying pigbreeders like Jason do when they can’t answer documented evidence put in front of them, such as was done regarding what Dr. Crompton told Kathy about the lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital, and then having the autopsy report 400ml of fluid in one of the lungs 3 days later.
Jason knows this debunks his “no treatment was done” hoax, so Jason is left only to wallow even more still in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality with long-winded blather that he has no documentation or credible reference sources to back up his filibuster. All anyone gets is the same self-decreed fabrications that Jason keeps pulling out of his ass.
All you have to do is post documented evidence of your phony “treatments” but you never can since no documents ever exist. Siefert refutes your phony claims.
This is why you will always lose. You can only blow hot air and never produce any evidence for your phony claims. Your hoax is a fraud.
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 15, 2019 at 12:30 pm
I (Jason) wish I could post documented evidence of my phony “no treatments were done” but I (Jason) never can since no documents ever exist. I (Jason) can only lie and say Siefert backs my phony claims, but Seifert does in fact say the opposite.
This is why I (Jason) will always lose. I (Jason) can only blow hot air and never produce any evidence for my phony claims. My (Jason’s) hoaxes are nothing but a fraud.”
^^FIXED !!
Jason stupidly proves my point that Jason can only continue to wallow in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality and this is what lying-denying pigbreeders like Jason do when they can’t answer documented evidence put in front of them.
No problem, we’ll keep putting it in front of him, since Jason already knows that he can’t answer it. Here it is:
*****Jason knows Dr. Teare was referencing the wine in his autopsy report, because if there was “no wine”, as Jason claims, then Dr. Teare never makes any such estimate of 100mg of BAC at the time of Vesparax ingestion, nor would Dr. Teare have written that into his autopsy report.
In chapter 11 of Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”, Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that Jimi’s lungs were filled with fluid when he arrived at the hospital. Where did Dr. Crompton get that information if it wasn’t documented somewhere?
Also, how did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as Jason claims?******
Same repeated nonsense, but still no documented hospital reports of “treatments” or “wine” you can produce for the phony claims you make..
And once again…
Here is the documented evidence Jason speaks of, but tries to pretend doesn’t exist:
*****Jason knows Dr. Teare was referencing the wine in his autopsy report, because if there was “no wine”, as Jason claims, then Dr. Teare never makes any such estimate of 100mg of BAC at the time of Vesparax ingestion, nor would Dr. Teare have written that into his autopsy report.
In chapter 11 of Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”, Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that Jimi’s lungs were filled with fluid when he arrived at the hospital. Where did Dr. Crompton get that information if it wasn’t documented somewhere?
Also, how did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as Jason claims?******
Notice how the dumbass (Jason) says “Kathy Etchingham did a real investigation gathering facts and evidence”, but tries to ignore what Dr. Crompton told Kathy about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid? Well, what Dr. Crompton told Kathy was part of her investigation and this question still remains unanswered by Jason:
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as Jason claims?****
Jason just debunked his own “no treatment was done” hoax.
Gotta love how these liar-deniers like Jason are stupid enough to contradict themselves with their own blather in their desperate denial of reality.
You debunked your own hoax moron. LMAO
This is hilarious!
Dr. Teare already documented in his autopsy report that there was 400 ml of fluid inside Hendrix which was not wine. No wine was ever forensically analyzed inside Hendrix anywhere. Also there was vomit left behind. This information was available for decades.
Your fraud pal Bannister claimed he sucked Hendrix bone dry…..oops!
“JASON, the lying-denying pigbreeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 15, 2019 at 12:35 pm
You debunked your own hoax moron. LMAO
This is hilarious!
Dr. Teare already documented in his autopsy report that there was 400 ml of fluid inside Hendrix which was not wine. No wine was ever forensically analyzed inside Hendrix anywhere. Also there was vomit left behind. This information was available for decades.
Your fraud pal Bannister claimed he sucked Hendrix bone dry…..oops!”
^^TRANSLATED: Jason can’t answer:
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as Jason claims?****
You see folks, this is both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & Jason knows it debunks his “no treatment was done” hoax.
And Jason is a blatant liar when he says “Bannister claimed he sucked Hendrix bone dry”. Anybody can go right to this link and read Bannister’s statements and see that Bannister never states any such thing:
http://woodstockhendrix.gobot.com/about.html
Jason is also a blatant liar when he says “Dr. Teare already documented in his autopsy report that there was 400 ml of fluid inside Hendrix which was not wine.”
Dr. Teare, in his autopsy report, called the 400ml of fluid in one of the lungs “free fluid”. Dr. Teare never stated that it wasn’t wine.
And Jason knows Dr. Teare was referencing the wine in his autopsy report, because if there was “no wine”, as Jason claims, then Dr. Teare never makes any such estimate of 100mg of BAC at the time of Vesparax ingestion, nor would Dr. Teare have written that into his autopsy report. Jason still has no answer for this.
Anyone can see how hilarious it is that Jason just desperately keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality with his continued self-decreed fabrications that Jason continually pulls out of his ass.
And one more thing…….
Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder that wallows in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality, is also blatantly lying when he says “No wine was ever forensically analyzed inside Hendrix anywhere.”
Dr. Thurston made it clear that wine was forensically analyzed inside Hendrix, when Dr. Thurston told Jack Meehan on Sept. 29, 1970 that Jimi’s stomach contents revealed that “a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed”.
Same repeated nonsense, but still no documented hospital reports on Jimi Hendrix of “treatments” or “wine” you can produce for the phony claims you make. Wine troll will always be defeated.
And Jason once again proves his illiteracy & that he can only take what is said by Seifert and rip it out of context. Seifert is simply stating that Jimi could not be saved. Seifert never states that “no treatments were done”. This can be seen here:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/etchinghammitchell2.html
Seifert says not once, but TWICE that they did work on Jimi and even used the words “After we worked on Jimi” and the hospital report stating ‘Time of Treatment: 11:45PM to 12:15PM’ that Seifert signed off on bears this out and proves Jason is ripping out of context what Seifert said and that Jason just continues to wallow in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
If there was no treatment done, then Seifert would have never used the words “After we worked on Jimi”, and none of Jason’s blather or Jason’s own word games can get around that fact.
Jason can’t claim his “no treatment was done” hoax without any documentation stating that using those exact words & there is none to be found anywhere.
This wine troll is working extremely hard, but he is debunked yet again, for taking Siefert’s words way out of context and still claiming a fake “treatment” that he can never produce any documents for.
Where are these “treatment” documents wine troll? Post them.
“We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead. After we worked on Jimi – we didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix until later on.”- Dr. Martin Siefert
Siefert clearly states he worked on Jimi for only a “few minutes” cuz he was already dead. Nothing about any “half hour treatments” Then Siefert said after he “worked on him for a few minutes” they didn’t know who he was until later on.
So, this wine troll is guilty of taking Siefert’s words way out of context to spin his bullshit wine hoax. Nowhere does Siefert say Hendrix was “worked on for a half hour” he specifically stated a “few minutes” and then he continued his words in the conversation.
So, again this wine troll has nothing except for empty words, but he can change that by posting real documented evidence of the phony “treatments” he claims happened.
^^TRANSLATED: Jason can only continue to wallow in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality and this is what lying-denying pigbreeders like Jason do when they can’t answer documented evidence put in front of them, such as was done regarding what Dr. Crompton told Kathy about the lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital, and then having the autopsy report 400ml of fluid in one of the lungs 3 days later.
Jason know this debunks his “no treatment was done” hoax, so Jason is left only to wallow even more still in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality with long-winded blather that he has no documentation or credible reference sources to back up his filibuster. All anyone gets is the same self-decreed fabrications that Jason keeps pulling out of his ass.
Nobody is ripping Seifert’s words out of context except Jason & Jason once again proves his illiteracy & that he can only take what is said by Seifert and rip it out of context. Seifert is simply stating that Jimi could not be saved. Seifert never states that “no treatments were done”. Seifert says not once, but TWICE that they did work on Jimi and even used the words “After we worked on Jimi” and the hospital report stating ‘Time of Treatment: 11:45PM to 12:15PM’ that Seifert signed off on bears this out and proves Jason is ripping out of context what Seifert said and that Jason just continues to wallow in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
This same time frame of 11:45AM to 12:15PM is referenced on page 160 of Mitch Mitchell’s book “Inside the Experience”, published in 1990, and that info was most likely gotten from the hospital report.
If there was no treatment done, then Seifert would have never used the words “After we worked on Jimi”, and none of Jason’s blather or Jason’s own word games can get around that fact.
Hi Jason, Great post. I’ve noticed they’re brought up Judy Garland again. I only mentioned her after seeing the film “Judy” because Dr. Thurston was also the coroner and to show the toxicity of barbiturates when taken over a long period of time and immediately as in Jimi’s case. Dr. Teare never mentioned that the free fluid contained only wine as vomit also contains other fluids mainly water. The fact that it was dry could only mean that Jimi had been dead for a while, The fluid in Jimi’s lungs was what flowed back into his system after he unsuccessfully tried to bring it up along with the Vesparax. Someone said that if Jimi had been on his side he might have survived. There’s no way of getting round the fact that the high dose of the barbiturate knocked Jimi out immediately and caused him to choke on his own vomit. No where does any official document contain the words cause of death copious amounts of red wine. These two fakers are now implying that the open verdict on the death certificate means that Jimi didn’t die of a drug overdose; what it really means is that there was no indication that he intended to commit suicide. All they’re doing is trying to manipulate the official findings to make it look as if Jimi’s death was suspicious. There is absolutely no logic in what they’re saying.
Hi Ivana,
Thanks and glad you enjoyed it. Yeah it’s back to Judy Garland again, but this troll debunks his own crap, cuz he believes Thurston’s Garland report, but claims a “cover up on Jimi Hendrix’s when no wine was documented. Total hypocrite lying troll.
Read my response below to the troll below. You will enjoy it as well.
Yes, no wine was ever detected in the fluid by Dr. Teare, but Fraud Bannister was supposed to have drained Hendrix dry so no fluid should be there..
It was John Saua who stated if Jimi was on his side he might have pulled through.
That’s exactly what Dr. Thurston stated Ivana, and in my response below, I make that abundantly clear to the troll.
This joker has nothing, 10 years and nothing, so all he can do is lie by making up phony claims and taking what doctors/witnesses say and adding his own b.s to it.
That’s what a troll does and why he was banned from various sites and forums for doing it.
Jason is once again creating the delusion that he is talking to some grand audience but the truth is no one is reading this but us…Any credible intelligent person who did read his posts would realize he’s just an internet troll who’s trying to get attention for his denial trolling and isn’t to be taken seriously…
Flyswatter’s WoodstockHendrix.gobot link shows a good summation of Dr Bannister’s witnessing…In it Bannister makes clear that the half hour treatment they did on Jimi was something they would have done on any patient in such a condition…Jason is a liar and childish taunting nut, so he’s ignoring that what any hospital will tell you is they will try to resuscitate until it becomes hopeless – which is exactly what they did with Jimi despite Jason’s demented lies…Remember, Bannister was the physician who was there and treated Jimi and Jason is just a sick internet troll who is trying to nay-say the murder evidence for sick purposes of trolling…It is an unfortunate circumstance of the internet that sick miscreants like Jason are given free access…
Jason thinks we don’t see him ignoring Dr Siefert’s comment that he “worked on Jimi”…That treatment Siefert is directly referring to was the 20 minute removal of the wine and 10 minute ventilation attempt that Dr Bannister clearly described and the Hospital Report listed…That treatment was formally documented on the Inquest data sheet as “Unable To Resuscitate”…Which means they tried to resuscitate Jimi but needed to clear his lungs of 5 bottles of wine first…Jason is obviously trying too hard to deny the obvious and his long way around the barn trolling is obvious for what it is…When Siefert tried to conceal this true description by saying he worked on Jimi for only a few minutes he was covering-up…
From Jason’s writing and posting hours I’m pretty sure he is one of the trolls from the Kennedy Assassination websites I post at who followed me over here…He sounds like a sick nut named Alan Ford…Jason is a sick pup and if we found his identity we would quickly see he is a nut who gets his rocks off trolling conspiracy discussions…Jason gets the protection of internet anonymity but he commits offenses that deserve the punishment of real-life justice…If I were moderator I would quickly ban him since he is obviously a demented troll who is not here for serious or honest purposes…
Spot on Buster……
And we see further evidence of Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder just continually wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality when Jason states “that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose like the official record states.”
Jason is a blatant liar, as there is no documentation anywhere to be found stating that Jimi died from a drug overdose.
***Jimi’s death certificate states:
Inhalation of vomit
barbiturate intoxication (quinalbarbitone)
insufficient evidence of circumstances
Open Verdict***
This clearly shows that the official record is NOT stating “drug overdose” as Jason falsely claims.
Judy Garland’s death certificate — written up by the same doctor, Gavin Thurston — clearly stated “barbiturate poisoning” and clearly differentiated between fatal overdose versus intoxication.
Also no reports of Judy Garland vomiting. And no reports of Judy Garland having her lungs completely overcome with fluid like Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that Jimi had.
If Jimi had died of a “drug overdose”, as Jason falsely claims, then Dr. Thurston would have written the same thing on Jimi’s death certificate that he wrote on Judy Garland’s death certificate & Dr Thurston would have never written the words “Open Verdict” on Jimi’s death certificate. We know that Dr Thurston didn’t write the words “Open Verdict” on Judy Garland’s death certificate.
Further proof of Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder just continually wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
“Buster” comes back with his alter ego “Flyswatter” posting more garbage but ends up refuting his own phony hoax for good. You see folks, this troll has nothing, for 10 years he has nothing and never will, so his only option is to run around like chicken with his head cut off throwing any crap he can find against the wall hoping it will stick. The problem for him, is that his crap slides off, since its’s not even worthy to be on the wall. Let’s debunk this hoax once again for good, but “Buster/Flyswatter” ends up doing it for us all by himself.
FLYSWATTER says: Spot on Buster……
And we see further evidence of Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder just continually wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality when Jason states “that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose like the official record states.”
JASON says: Spot on? I just refuted you with your alter “Buster” ego. More empty words and still no documented evidence for the phony claims you make. Ready to get refuted some more?
FLYSWATTER says: Jason is a blatant liar, as there is no documentation anywhere to be found stating that Jimi died from a drug overdose.
JASON says: LMAO…You are the blatant liar wine troll. You might want to check the official hospital statement from St. Mary Abbots Hospital on 9/18/70 that confirms Jimi died of an overdose. You are a lousy troll and make a fool out of yourself each time you post.
“We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”- Official St. Mary Abbots Hospital statement on Jimi Hendrix’s death 9/18/70
JASON says: So, Mr. Wine troll, there is your official documentation from St. Mary Abbots hospital that confirms that Jimi Hendrix died of an overdose on 9/18/70.
Not one damn word about “wine” or a “wine drowning”.
How do you like them apples?
So, Fraud Bannister pronounced Hendrix dead which means he signed off on this statement to be released.
Where was all the phony wine Bannister claimed in 1992? Why wasn’t a “wine drowning” mentioned on 9/18/70 like he claimed 21 years later?
Where is the mention of all these phony “procedures” you claimed took place post 1992?
All these phony claims were made up post 1992 and nothing like this ever happened on 9/18/70. On 9/18/70 it was a confirmed overdose like the hospital stated. Not one word about wine since there never was any wine on 9/18/70.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital clearly confirmed Jimi Hendrix died of a overdose on 9/18/70.
This proves without a doubt that none of your phony claimed “wine removal procedures” ever took place. St. Mary Abbots said drugs and not wine. And that is documented evidence forever etched in history.
Now how do you answer that?
FLYSWATTER says: ***Jimi’s death certificate states:
Inhalation of vomit
barbiturate intoxication (quinalbarbitone)
insufficient evidence of circumstances
Open Verdict***
JASON says: Thank You for confirming the official statement from St. Mary Abbots Hospital that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose.
The death certificate clearly states inhalation of vomit and barbiturate intoxication. Not one damn word about your phony “wine” that was never there. If there was wine, the death certificate would have listed it. It says nothing about wine since there never was any wine.
Also moron, barbiturate intoxication is a drug overdose since Hendrix took 9 pills over 18 times the prescribed amount, plus a “black bomber”. But you are too damn stupid to even understand that. We are all having a great big laugh at you right now.
We all applaud you “Buster/Flyswatter” for debunking your phony hoax yourself for good.
FLYSWATTER says: This clearly shows that the official record is NOT stating “drug overdose” as Jason falsely claims.
“We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”- Official St. Mary Abbots Hospital statement on Jimi Hendrix’s death 9/18/70
JASON says: Sorry wine troll. the official statement from St. Mary Abbots Hospital refutes you since they clearly confirm it was a drug overdose. The forensic analysis from the vomit sample determined it was a drug overdose like St. Mary Abbots Hospital stated. Not one damn word about wine, since no “wine drowning” ever happened.
This clearly backs the autopsy that it was a drug overdose as well. The hospital report, Teare’s autopsy findings, and Thurston’s final report perfectly dovetails with a barbiturate drug overdose and nothing ever about your phony wine was ever documented anywhere. This is all a hoax folks.
You phony “Hendrix Wine Murder Hoax” is forever sitting in a dumpster fire.
FLYSWATTER says: Judy Garland’s death certificate — written up by the same doctor, Gavin Thurston — clearly stated “barbiturate poisoning” and clearly differentiated between fatal overdose versus intoxication.
Also no reports of Judy Garland vomiting. And no reports of Judy Garland having her lungs completely overcome with fluid like Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that Jimi had.
JASON says: Talking about Judy Garland isn’t going to save you wine troll. Judy Garland didn’t take 9 Vesparax pills or a “black bomber” like Jimi did early in the morning nor was she drinking wine all evening at 2 get togethers which resulted in Jimi being slightly above the legal drinking limit as Dr. Teare documented.
So, this wine troll believes Dr. Thurston when he reported Judy Garland’s autopsy report, but starts to snivel and claims a “cover up” when Jimi Hendrix is declared a drug overdose by Thurston, showing not one drop of he phony wine he claims. That’s why we don’t take a lying turd like his seriously. Just a weaselly lying troll who rejects the real documented evidence with the garbage claims he makes up in his crazy head for which he has zero proof to show.
Another failed try from a wine troll, but once again comes up empty, since no “wine” is ever documented anywhere on an official recorded medical report on Jimi Hendrix. Where is all this “massive wine”? It’s nowhere to be found cuz it never existed.
FLYSWATTER says: If Jimi had died of a “drug overdose”, as Jason falsely claims, then Dr. Thurston would have written the same thing on Jimi’s death certificate that he wrote on Judy Garland’s death certificate & Dr Thurston would have never written the words “Open Verdict” on Jimi’s death certificate. We know that Dr Thurston didn’t write the words “Open Verdict” on Judy Garland’s death certificate.
JASON says; What do you think barbiturate intoxication is dumbass? That’s a medical term for a drug overdose. Boy, you are a moron.
Jimi Hendrix took 9 Vesparax pills plus a “black bomber”, that is a powerful amphetamine. That is a drug overdose, idiot
Also, St. Mary Abbots confirmed to the media and the world that it as a drug overdose.
“We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”- Official St. Mary Abbots Hospital statement on Jimi Hendrix’s death 9/18/70
JASON says: The hospital confirmed a drug overdose on 9/18/70. Not one word about your phony wine.
This moron “Buster/Flyswatter” is trying to compare two different cases making it into the same thing. This is hilarious!
Dr. Thurston only recorded an open verdict cuz there was insufficient evidence if Hendrix tried to commit suicide. It has nothing to do with “murder”, “wine”, or any other bullshit a troll like you tries to claim
“The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication, but there is no evidence as to intention to commit suicide … If the question of intention cannot be answered, then it is proper to find the cause of death and leave it an open verdict.”- Dr. Gavin Thurston
JASON says: Dr. Gavin Thurston clearly spells out his reason for declaring it an “open verdict”. It was an open verdict cuz he couldn’t determine if Hendrix committed suicide. It’s right there in simple terms in black and white and no bullshit word games you play can refute what this man said. I am almost 999.9999% sure you are going to claim a “cover up” since you’ve been refuted again.
Also, Dr. Gavin Thurston explicitly says that “the cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication” and not one damn word about your phony wine that never existed was ever documented anywhere.
Your phony wine hoax will forever burn in the debunked conspiracy garbage dumpster fire.
FLYSWATTER says: Further proof of Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder just continually wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
JASON says: Further proof from this hilarious debunking, that “Buster/Flyswatter” is a lying troll, who rolls in his pigshit hoax of imaginary wine with phony clams, in which he has no documented evidence and will never be able to refute the official verdict of a drug overdose.
“Buster” was tired of being “Flyswatter” so he continues to troll the real documented evidence of Jimi’s death by posting his debunked conspiracy crap for which he can never produce any documented evidence for his phony claims. You would think after 10 long years he was bound to come up with something…..nope….he’s still got nothin’ …..and he never will.
BUSTER says: Jason is once again creating the delusion that he is talking to some grand audience but the truth is no one is reading this but us…Any credible intelligent person who did read his posts would realize he’s just an internet troll who’s trying to get attention for his denial trolling and isn’t to be taken seriously…
JASON says: I’m posting the real documented evidence of the official record of Jimi Hendrix’s death, which has been confirmed by medical professionals and is etched in history as facts. You’re trolling the official verdict and documented evidence with your phony wine hoax like you’ve been doing for 10 years. You’ve also been banned from many sites and forums for trolling the real evidence with your bogus conspiracy crap for which you can never produce any documented evidence in 10 long years. You are the troll who claims Jimi was “murdered” but you have no documented evidence of wine. Yes, we all know you are a troll who was even banned at wikipedia for posting your debunked conspiracy crap. They had to good sense to boot you off for good. I applaud them for that. I promote the truth and you promote and fraudulent hoax.
BUSTER says: Flyswatter’s WoodstockHendrix.gobot link shows a good summation of Dr Bannister’s witnessing…In it Bannister makes clear that the half hour treatment they did on Jimi was something they would have done on any patient in such a condition…Jason is a liar and childish taunting nut, so he’s ignoring that what any hospital will tell you is they will try to resuscitate until it becomes hopeless – which is exactly what they did with Jimi despite Jason’s demented lies…Remember, Bannister was the physician who was there and treated Jimi and Jason is just a sick internet troll who is trying to nay-say the murder evidence for sick purposes of trolling…It is an unfortunate circumstance of the internet that sick miscreants like Jason are given free access…
JASON says: More hot air from a wine troll who can never post any documented evidence for his phony claims, only cheap words which amounts to nothing.
The only liar here is you, who is pushing a debunked fraudulent hoax with made up theories in your crazy head. I’m posting factual documented evidence that proves the official verdict is correct.
Nobody cares what Bannister claims he witnessed. His so called claims means nothing. We want actual recorded documentation that proves these “procedures” happened. No documentation exists, which is why this whole thing is one big giant phony baloney scam hoax.
Don’t you think Jimi already being a dead 6 hour rotting corpse would be hopeless you moron? You just make a fool out of yourself more and more.
Siefert clearly stated it was hopeless since Jimi was pronounced dead on arrival. Jimi was dead at the flat and was dead when he was wheeled in to the hospital. That proves no dead 6 hour person is going to get 30 minute phony “treatments”. They get shipped off to the morgue like Jimi was .You are a clown and everybody laughs at you.
Siefert said this: “I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.”
Siefert is telling you it already was hopeless and it was too late since Jimi was already dead. That’s why he did nothing more than pound his heart a couple of times.
Guess who else stated it was hopeless back at the flat? That’s right, John Saua.
“We knew it was hopeless. There was no pulse, no respiration.” – John Saua Ambulance man
John Saua is telling you it was hopeless. Jimi Hendrix was already dead at the flat and could not be saved. That means Jimi could not be saved at the hospital, which is why Siefert did nothing more for him besides pound his heart twice as a formality. Once again, your phony hoax has been debunked.
Sorry, a dead 6 hour rotting corpse does not get “half hour treatments”, they get shipped off to the morgue like the newspapers reported happened to Jimi Hendrix on 9/18 and 9/19/70.
“Buster” aka Brian Doyle is given free access to troll the official verdict on the internet in which he can never produce any documented evidence for his phony “murder” claims. 10 years and counting and still nothin’. You are a troll Brian Doyle.
Bannister is a 3 count convicted fraud who lost his medical license and has no documentation of these “procedures” ever happening. That means they did not happen. Hospitals document everything.
Dr. Siefert said in plain English that Hendrix was worked on for only a “few minutes” since he was already dead. But a wine troll like you ignores it still pushing your forever failed conspiracy crap.
BUSTER says: Jason thinks we don’t see him ignoring Dr Siefert’s comment that he “worked on Jimi”…That treatment Siefert is directly referring to was the 20 minute removal of the wine and 10 minute ventilation attempt that Dr Bannister clearly described and the Hospital Report listed…That treatment was formally documented on the Inquest data sheet as “Unable To Resuscitate”…Which means they tried to resuscitate Jimi but needed to clear his lungs of 5 bottles of wine first…Jason is obviously trying too hard to deny the obvious and his long way around the barn trolling is obvious for what it is…When Siefert tried to conceal this true description by saying he worked on Jimi for only a few minutes he was covering-up…
JASON says: Here we go folks….. “Buster” aka Brian Doyle uses his fake “cover up” claim when he is refuted just like I predicted he would. There was no cover up folks, and this troll has been defeated again, since he cannot counter the official verdicts documented evidence with any documented evidence of his own to prove otherwise. All he can do is post bogus clams he makes up in his crazy head. Sorry, that is not evidence. That’s just a fool spouting off nonsense.
Sorry wine troll….you lie again…. I didn’t “ignore” any comment from Siefert, since I’ve posted them many times.
“We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead. After we worked on Jimi – we didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix until later on.” – Dr. Siefert
JASON says: Once again, this fraudulent wine troll takes Siefert’s comments way out of context pushing his scam “murder” hoax with his bogus commentary that never happened. This is what you call a troll folks.
Siefert says in plain English that he worked on Jimi for just a “few minutes”. Nowhere does he state he did “phony procedures” or worked on him for a “half hour”. He then says after he “worked on him for a few minutes”, that they didn’t know who he was until later on. So, you are debunked again with your phony bullshit claims.
No 20 minute “wine removal” ever happened since Siefert debunked that phony claim in his testimony. You are making up more bullshit as you troll along with zero documentation to back it up.
No “treatment” is ever documented on Jimi Hendrix’s official medical record, and this wine troll Brian Doyle, can never produce one, so he trolls with these bogus claims he makes up in his crazy demented head.
Any attempt in formality to resuscitate a person will have “Unable To Resuscitate” listed since it’s standard hospital protocol. But this wine troll Brian Doyle lies claiming that means “20 minute wine removal” since he is a crazy lunatic.
Call up any hospital in the UK and ask them this. They will tell you this is a fact straight out. Also, ask them if they perform “procedures” and “treatments” on a 6 hour long dead rotting corpse. They will get angry and hang up on you.
Brian Doyle aka “Buster/Flyswatter” has no answers for this, except for only blowing hot air pushing his debunked lies. You claim these “treatments” happened. Well, post some documented evidence of these phony “procedures” you claim. How come you haven’t been able to produce any documents for 10 years? None exist that’s why, so you just troll along with your phony claims wanting to “debate”. What a joke.
Your fake claims are useless, just like your whole bogus “Hendrix Murder Theory” that sits inside a garbage dumpster.
BUSTER says: From Jason’s writing and posting hours I’m pretty sure he is one of the trolls from the Kennedy Assassination websites I post at who followed me over here…He sounds like a sick nut named Alan Ford…Jason is a sick pup and if we found his identity we would quickly see he is a nut who gets his rocks off trolling conspiracy discussions…Jason gets the protection of internet anonymity but he commits offenses that deserve the punishment of real-life justice…If I were moderator I would quickly ban him since he is obviously a demented troll who is not here for serious or honest purposes…
JASON says: Lord Mr. Ford, I just wish that you could see
What your simple horseless carriage has become
Well it seems your contribution to man
To say the least, got a little out of hand
Well Lord Mr. Ford what have you done.
Jerry Reed anyone?
“Buster/Flyswatter” aka Brian Doyle now tries to claim that i’m somebody else now. This is hilarious! This is like the 4th person he claims I am in his cheap and pathetic character attack.
A conspiracy it is, and you’re right about that, since this all one big giant debunked hoax.
I am here for serious purposes, since I am defending the official documented death record of Jimi Hendrix, posting facts and evidence. Evidence that was forensically analyzed and recorded, and documented testimony that will forever be listed as Jimi’s death. Everybody agrees with that, except for you, and a few other morons, but you are in the extreme minority.
You are trolling “Buster,” making up bogus theories and lies, making up phony claims that never happened, lying about what Siefert and the ambulance men said, changing your phony claims each time you post. That is what trolling is and you’ve been banned for doing that on many sites.
All of your trolling and story changing lies are documented on this site for all to see. You can’t run and hide from them. They are there.
Of course you would ban me cuz you’re a coward and a hypocrite. You are angry that I’ve exposed your sham hoax with real documented evidence and that I’ve shown you to be a liar and a hoaxer. You want the real evidence suppressed so you can continue to lie about a phony “murder” that never happened. You also whine about being banned from sites but you want to do the same. You are a hypocrite.
This is not your site “Buster”, so quit whining about banning me. Justin gives us the free speech to post here without censorship in which I thank him for. You posted many obscenity laced posts and attacked Justin publicly many times. You’re lucky you haven’t been banned yet like you were on all those other sites.
Instead of whining about me, all you have to do is post some real documented evidence of the phony “wine removal” claims you make. 10 long years and you haven’t been able to do so. Only a sick individual like you wants Jimi to be “murdered” as you make up blatant lies when every single piece of evidence always refutes you. That’s pathetic.
^^TRANSLATED: Jason can only continue to wallow in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality and this is what lying-denying pigbreeders like Jason do when they can’t answer documented evidence put in front of them, such as was done regarding what Dr. Crompton told Kathy about the lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital, and then having the autopsy report 400ml of fluid in one of the lungs 3 days later.
Jason know this debunks his “no treatment was done” hoax, so Jason is left only to wallow even more still in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality with long-winded blather that he has no documentation or credible reference sources to back up his filibuster. All anyone gets is the same self-decreed fabrications that Jason keeps pulling out of his ass.
You see folks, what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, is both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & Jason knows it debunks his “no treatment was done” hoax.
Jason knows this cements Dr. Bannister’s testimony, so Jason can only post his self-decreed long winded blather to try to avoid it, but Jason is only proving that he can’t answer this documentation that he keeps calling for.
This is the same dumbass (Jason) that says “Kathy Etchingham did a real investigation gathering facts and evidence”, but tries to ignore what Dr. Crompton told Kathy about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid in 1991. Since Jason can’t answer this, all Jason has left is to post his lying misquotes regarding Dr. Seifert.
Jason also can’t answer the documented evidence of Jimi’s death certificate proving Jason’s false claim of “Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose like the official record states” to be a blatant lie by Jason.
BTW, Buster and I are not one and the same person, asshole.
More garbage from this troll and still no documented evidence. But he destroys his phony hoax eve more. Hilarious.
FLYSWATTER says:^^TRANSLATED: Jason can only continue to wallow in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality and this is what lying-denying pigbreeders like Jason do when they can’t answer documented evidence put in front of them, such as was done regarding what Dr. Crompton told Kathy about the lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital, and then having the autopsy report 400ml of fluid in one of the lungs 3 days later.
JASON says: LOL. Dr. Teare already documented the 400 ml of fluid inside Hendrix during the autopsy in 1970. That information was known for decades. This is nothing new. Also, Teare found no “wine” in that fluid through forensic analysis which debunks your wine hoax. If Hendrix was “drowned in wine” that fluid through forensic analysis would have detected it. No wine was found which means no “wine drowning”.
Also, wine was never in play in 1970 since there was no “wine drowning”.
And finally that wineless fluid shouldn’t have been detected by Teare since Fraud Bannister and you claim Hendrix was sucked out bone dry at the hospital 3 days earlier…oops!
Your phony hoax is debunked even more troll
FLYSWATTER says: Jason know this debunks his “no treatment was done” hoax, so Jason is left only to wallow even more still in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality with long-winded blather that he has no documentation or credible reference sources to back up his filibuster. All anyone gets is the same self-decreed fabrications that Jason keeps pulling out of his ass.
JASON says: Hilarious, since there is no documented medical or autopsy report on Jimi Hendrix showing phony “treatments”. No evidence of this and a dead 6 hour corpse doesn’t get “treatments” troll.
But still no documented evidence for your phony claims that you can ever produce for these “treatments”.
FLYSWATTER says: You see folks, what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, is both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & Jason knows it debunks his “no treatment was done” hoax.
JASON says: This troll is a lousy troll and a stupid one at that.
All the forensic analysis and the cause of Jimi Hendrix’s death has been forensically analyzed, investigated, and determined which will always be documented as a drug overdose. No phony “treatments” were ever documented, so that is not a hoax as this troll plays his word games. The hoax lies with this fraud, who makes serious “murder claims” but can never back it up with real documentation cuz he is just a troll who will always blow hot air. 10 years he’s been doing this folks and that’s why it’s a joke.
Dr. Teare in 1970, already established fluid was inside Hendrix and this was known for decades. This is not new information. Also, no wine was ever detected in Teare’s forensic analysis which proves no wine was ever flooding Hendrix. And finally, the fluid and vomit that Teare analyzed was supposed to be drained by Bannister 3 days earlier athe hospital…oops!
There goes another phony hoax into the garbage dumpster fire
FLYSWATTER says: Jason knows this cements Dr. Bannister’s testimony, so Jason can only post his self-decreed long winded blather to try to avoid it, but Jason is only proving that he can’t answer this documentation that he keeps calling for.
Cements Bannister’s testimony? LMAO!!!!!!
Where is Fraud Bannister’s proof of his documentation of his phony “procedures”? He has none since it never happened.
Fraud Bannister has been debunked by both ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua, Officer Ian Smith, Dr. Siefert, Dr. Bob Brown, St. Mary Abbots Hospital offical statement, Dr. Teare, Dr. Gavin Thurston, science, hospital regulations and protocol, and the forensic analysis that proves him to be a lying fraud. That’s why he was convicted for 3 counts of fraud in 1992 losing his medical license for life.
I’ve answered and debunked all your bullshit, but you can never produce and real documentation for your bogus claims. You can’t do that cuz none exists. You are a troll.
FLYSWATTER says: This is the same dumbass (Jason) that says “Kathy Etchingham did a real investigation gathering facts and evidence”, but tries to ignore what Dr. Crompton told Kathy about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid in 1991. Since Jason can’t answer this, all Jason has left is to post his lying misquotes regarding Dr. Seifert.
JASON says: More word games and a phony alternate story from this troll.
Dr. Teare made the evidence of 400 ml of fluid in Hendrix’s lungs known in 1970, so what you are stating is nothing new. I’ve already stated this before so I’m not ignoring anything, moron. Also, no wine was in the fluid as trolls like you claim. Fraud Bannister was supposed t have sucked Hendrix dry 3 days earlier so this fluid shouldn’t even exist….oops!
it’s awesome how you keep debunking your own scam yourself!
FLYSWATTER says: Jason also can’t answer the documented evidence of Jimi’s death certificate proving Jason’s false claim of “Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose like the official record states” to be a blatant lie by Jason.
JASON says: LOL. I’ve already have many times before, but this troll keeps repeating the same nonsense over and over with his severe reading comprehension problem.
“We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”- St. Mary Abbots Hospital official statement on Jimi Hendrix’s death.
JASON says: Here you go again troll….official documentation clearly stating Jim died from a drug overdose directly from the source….St. Mary Abbots Hospital.
Not one word about wine or “wine drowning”….they confirm a drug overdose.
BTW, the hospital and Dr. Thurston both confirmed it was a drug overdose, dumbass. Intoxication is a overdose of medication. That’s how stupid you are.
How do you like them apples?
FLYSWATTER says: BTW, Buster and I are not one and the same person, asshole.
JASON says: Sure you are. Same style garbage posts and other people on other sites say you are.
^^TRANSLATED: Jason still has no answer to:
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as Jason claims?****
Just more long-winded blather that doesn’t answer that question proving that a resuscitation attempt was made and debunking Jason’s “no treatment was done” hoax.
“Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder just continually wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says
And finally that wineless fluid shouldn’t have been detected by Teare since Fraud Bannister and you claim Hendrix was sucked out bone dry at the hospital 3 days earlier…oops!”
LOL ! Still more of Jason’s own pigshit mire that Jason likes to keep wallowing in, in his desperate denial of reality.
At no time, anywhere, did I ever state that Jim was sucked “bone dry” at the hospital. Just another self-decreed fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass.
Jason just exhibits what a blatant liar that he is.
Anybody can go right to this link and read Bannister’s statements and see that Bannister never states any such thing either:
http://woodstockhendrix.gobot.com/about.html
Hi Jason. Excellent post. You need to check out this site “boards.straightdope.com” pages 1&2 by Jetblast posted on 1-19-2010. Sounds like someone we know.
In plain sight for every eye to see……
Jason can only continue to wallow in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality and this is what lying-denying pigbreeders like Jason do when they can’t answer documented evidence put in front of them, such as was done regarding what Dr. Crompton told Kathy about the lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital, and then having the autopsy report 400ml of fluid in one of the lungs 3 days later.
Jason knows this debunks his “no treatment was done” hoax, so Jason is left only to wallow even more still in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality with long-winded blather that he has no documentation or credible reference sources to back up his filibuster. All anyone gets is the same self-decreed fabrications that Jason keeps pulling out of his ass.
Neither Jimi’s death certificate, nor the autopsy report state that an overdose caused Jimi’s death. Neither of these ever use the word “overdose.” They both clearly state that Jimi suffocated & Jason thinks his long-winded blather refutes this, but it doesn’t and it also doesn’t answer:
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as Jason claims?****
Once again folks, what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, is both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & Jason knows it debunks his “no treatment was done” hoax.
Jason knows this cements Dr. Bannister’s testimony, so Jason can only post his self-decreed long winded blather to try to avoid it, but Jason is only proving that he can’t answer this documentation that he keeps calling for.
Jason exhibits his stupidity with this quote of ““We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”- Official St. Mary Abbots Hospital statement on Jimi Hendrix’s death 9/18/70”, and trying to claim it as official documentation. No reference source to this quote & anybody can see the staggering contradiction in the same sentence. It goes from saying “don’t know how” to claiming “died of an overdose”. Can’t have it both ways.
Is this another quote that Jason got from Reuters just like the false report that Jason got from Reuters regarding Janis Joplin’s death that was refuted by Janis’ actual autopsy report? Sure sounds like it & it certainly doesn’t stand as “official documentation” — this sounds like just a public statement made by some hospital spokesman that never talked to the attending doctors.
Jason knows this quote of his has been overturned by what Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs.
Jason knows this quote of his has been overturned by Dr. Teare referencing the wine in his autopsy report, because if there was “no wine”, as Jason claims, then Dr. Teare never makes any such estimate of 100mg of BAC at the time of Vesparax ingestion, nor would Dr. Teare have written that into his autopsy report. Jason still has no answer for this.
Jason knows this quote of his has been overturned by Dr. Bob Brown stating that Jimi “had a bit too much to drink”, and Jason still has no answer for “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink if there was ‘no wine’ as Jason keeps claiming?”. And it has already been proven that Dr. Brown wasn’t citing Jimi’s autopsy report, as Dr. Brown would know from reading that autopsy, that Dr. Teare’s statement of 100mg BAC was only an ESTIMATE and that Jimi’s real BAC was .005%. No doctor anywhere in the world is going to refer to a BAC of .005% as being “too much to drink”.
Jason knows this quote of his has been overturned by Dr. Seifert being recorded on video by David kramer that Jimi was covered in red wine.
Jason knows this quote of his has been overturned by Dr. Thurston telling Jack Meehan on Sept. 29, 1970 that Jimi’s stomach contents revealed “a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed”.
Jason knows this quote of his has been overturned by Dr. Bannister’s testimony that can be seen here:
http://woodstockhendrix.gobot.com/about.html
Jason can hate and slander Dr. Bannister all he wants to, but Jason knows that Dr. Seifert, Dr. Brown, Dr. Teare, Dr. Thurston, and Dr. Crompton all make reference to that same wine that Dr. Bannister speaks of.
“Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder that just continually keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
St. Mary Abbots Hospital clearly confirmed Jimi Hendrix died of a overdose on 9/18/70.
This proves without a doubt that none of your phony claimed “wine removal procedures” ever took place. St. Mary Abbots said drugs and not wine. And that is documented evidence forever etched in history.
Now how do you answer that?”
Same as before, which Jason has been showed multiple times, but can’t answer:
*****Jason knows Dr. Teare was referencing the wine in his autopsy report, because if there was “no wine”, as Jason claims, then Dr. Teare never makes any such estimate of 100mg of BAC at the time of Vesparax ingestion, nor would Dr. Teare have written that into his autopsy report.
In chapter 11 of Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”, Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that Jimi’s lungs were filled with fluid when he arrived at the hospital. Where did Dr. Crompton get that information if it wasn’t documented somewhere?
Also, how did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as Jason claims?******
“Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder that just continually keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
What do you think barbiturate intoxication is dumbass? That’s a medical term for a drug overdose. Boy, you are a moron.”
TRANSLATED: Jason illustrates his illiteracy & has no answer regarding Judy Garland’s death certificate — written up by the same doctor, Gavin Thurston — clearly stating “barbiturate poisoning” and clearly differentiating between fatal overdose versus intoxication.
The real dumbass is Jason, as Dr. Thurston clearly spelled out the difference between fatal overdose versus intoxication. “Barbiturate Intoxication” doesn’t mean fatal overdose, while “Barbiturate Poisoning” DOES mean fatal overdose. Jason is too stupid to see the difference, even with it having been spelled out right in front of him.
Jason lies and tries to suggest that what was said was “Barbiturate Intoxication” doesn’t mean overdose. No such thing was stated. What was stated was it doesn’t mean “FATAL” overdose. Another example of this lying-denying pigbreeder named named Jason taking what is said and ripping it out of context.
And Jason also had no answer to the fact that there was no reports of Judy Garland vomiting or having lungs completely filled with fluid, as was the case with Jimi.
“Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder that just continually keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
Thank You for confirming the official statement from St. Mary Abbots Hospital that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose.
The death certificate clearly states inhalation of vomit and barbiturate intoxication. Not one damn word about your phony “wine” that was never there. If there was wine, the death certificate would have listed it. It says nothing about wine since there never was any wine.”
Keep dreaming, shitball. Every single doctor involved with the Jimi Hendrix death case made reference to wine. Every last one of them. Even Dr. Crompton two decades later when he told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital. Where did Dr. Crompton get this information from if it wasn’t documented? Jason will never be able to answer this.
The vomit was clearly caused by wine drowning. None of Jason’s blather can erase that fact.
“Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder that just continually keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
Talking about Judy Garland isn’t going to save you wine troll. Judy Garland didn’t take 9 Vesparax pills or a “black bomber” like Jimi did early in the morning nor was she drinking wine all evening at 2 get togethers which resulted in Jimi being slightly above the legal drinking limit as Dr. Teare documented.”
Good job of Jason exposing his stupidity, once again.
Dr. Teare documented in his autopsy report that Jimi’s blood alcohol content was .005%. No doctor anywhere in the world is going to regard that as “being slightly above the legal drinking limit”. It also proves Jason’s claim of “drinking wine all evening at 2 get togethers which resulted in Jimi being slightly above the legal drinking limit as Dr. Teare documented” to be another one of Jason’s self-decreed fabrications that Jason pulls out of his ass.
“Jason, the lying-denying pigbreeder that just continually keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
How do you like them apples?”
Jason’s apples are clearly full of worms.
There’s twisted fuckers out there who think it is fun to fuck with people by playing mock debate games on the internet…There’s a sick website out there where people spend their day doing mental masturbation called “Skeptoid”…Jason is one of those fuckers…
It’s more than clear that Flyswatter’s and my own cases match the evidence in a smooth and conforming manner while Jason’s is obviously a contrived troll screed that depends on deliberately ripping everything out of context and misinterpreting semantics…Anyone who steps back and asks whose case matches the evidence better will come in on our side…
Jason is trying to use his false 6 hour dead claim, and Siefert’s lie that they only worked on Jimi for a few minutes, to overturn a whole slew of incriminating evidence…But, once again, Jason violates the rules of evidence and debate in his dishonest forcing of false claims…
Jason has already been told that the determination that Jimi was dead for 6 hours hadn’t been made until 1991 when Dr Crompton examined Dr Teare’s autopsy of Jimi…Jason knows this but he keeps ignoring it and entering the false claim that Siefert and Bannister knew Jimi was dead for 6 hours when they received him…Jason is violating the rules of evidence because he tells us to go ask any hospital if they would treat a 6 hour dead body?…But that isn’t an accurate question because Siefert and Bannister did not know Jimi had been dead for 6 hours when he showed-up…The real question Jason is avoiding is asking any hospital if they would do their best to revive such a person not knowing how long he was dead?…It was Dr Bannister who answered that when he said “We did what we would do with anyone in those circumstances”…
Jason is using deceptive language and logic when he uses Dr Siefert’s lie as the one and only guide to Jimi’s treatment…The reason Siefert and Bannister attempted to save Jimi is because they usually relied on the ambulance men as their first level of triage…If a body had been dead for 6 hours the ambulance men would have called it at the Samarkand once they had the police there…The ambulance men even said they packed Jimi off to hospital in order to save paperwork…The true determiner Jason is avoiding is that most cases like Jimi assume the 999 caller is trying to help a struggling person so the doctors continue that process with their emergency intervention…So once Jimi showed up at their doorstep Siefert and Bannister simply assumed the victim passed triage and went right to trying to save him…This is what happened…I’m sure this asshole Jason will go in to his carnival barker con man mode in his answer and hail to his imaginary audience, but he won’t post anything to change these facts that clearly back us and not him…
Jason is a liar because, no matter what Siefert said, the Hospital Report entered in plain writing that Jimi was treated for a half hour from 11:45 to 12:15…Jason is evading giving any answer to the fact Platt got the Hospital Report from Mitch’s wife Dee Mitchell who was actively accessing the hospital records at the time…Since that half hour matches Bannister’s claim, as well as Monika’s saying they treated Jimi for a long time, that proves Bannister is the accurate truth-teller and Siefert is covering-up…Siefert was head registrar and legally responsible for correct information being entered in the Hospital Report…When he signed-off on the 11:45 to 12:15 treatment time that was entered on that report he confirmed it…There are no arguments past that…
Jason also lied about there only being dry vomit in Jimi and no wine…Kathy Etchingham got a quote from Dr Crompton that Jimi couldn’t have been breathing when he arrived at hospital because his lungs were full of fluid…Just the 400ml of free fluid Dr Teare discovered was proof enough that Jimi did not have only dry vomit as Jason lied…The reason Dr Crompton said Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid was because he looked at the Hospital Report and saw a half hour resuscitation attempt…Being a skilled pathologist Crompton knew right away that the half hour indicated fluid had been removed from Jimi’s lungs leaving that residual 400ml…And I would probably guess that Crompton may have even spoken to Siefert himself and gotten the true lowdown doctor to doctor where Siefert knew he dare not lie to the head London Coroner’s Office Pathologist…Gavin Thurston also corroborated Jimi having a large amount of red wine in his stomach, which is proof of unaccounted for wine because the blood alcohol content was too low to match it forensically…This is proof of a cover-up because Thurston and the Coroner’s Office then had a legal obligation to account for that unaccountable wine in their forensic determinations…In any case, despite Jason’s idiotic lies, we have now accounted for both the wine in the stomach and lungs Bannister spoke of…We have zero corroboration for Siefert’s lie of only treating Jimi for a few minutes…Plus we have evidence of Scotland Yard evading evidence by not seeking the nurses who would have confirmed Bannister…
Jason is one of many assholes on the internet who, because of delinquent moderation, have been getting away with this kind of demented activity…The internet is a free for all of trolls and crazies and Jason is one of them…Jason bit off more than he could chew with us and the trolling he is obviously used to getting away with is blowing back on him as he realizes he’s met his match and is in the process of having his ass handed to him by two skilled pros whose evidence is now surrounding him and closing in for the kill…Jason’s troll screed isn’t working…The smoke is clearing and there stands Jason obviously realizing his pathetic lies aren’t working as they bounce off the solid fortress of our more than proven evidence that anyone can see he can’t answer in public…
Buster, you gotta love this……..
When Jason is confronted with this………..
****FLYSWATTER says: You see folks, what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, is both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & Jason knows it debunks his “no treatment was done” hoax.****
Look at this weak-assed and laughable response
****JASON says: This troll is a lousy troll and a stupid one at that.
All the forensic analysis and the cause of Jimi Hendrix’s death has been forensically analyzed, investigated, and determined which will always be documented as a drug overdose. No phony “treatments” were ever documented, so that is not a hoax as this troll plays his word games.****
Anyone can easily see the stupid and lousy troll is Jason. Is this the best that Jason can come up with when he can’t answer to documented evidence proving his “no treatment was done” hoax.
How stupid is Jason to not realize that Crompton’s statement of Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid upon arrival to the hospital & the 400ml of free fluid in one of the lung 3 days later at the autopsy IS forensically analyzed, investigated, and determined evidence that was documented. And it does document that treatment was done. The treatment was further documented on the Inquest form when it stated “Unable to Resuscitate” and proves Jason is a blatant liar when Jason tries to claim no treatments were done.
Jason knows this trashes his “no treatment was done” hoax, so all Jason can do is blatantly lie to try to get around it, as evidenced by his “All the forensic analysis and the cause of Jimi Hendrix’s death has been forensically analyzed, investigated, and determined which will always be documented as a drug overdose”. That’s a blatant lie, as both the death certificate and the autopsy report make it clear that Jimi had suffocated & Crompton exposed that even further still with what he told Kathy.
Jason has no answer that Dr. Thurston made it clear that wine was forensically analyzed inside Hendrix, when Dr. Thurston told Jack Meehan on Sept. 29, 1970 that Jimi’s stomach contents revealed that “a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed”.
There were no “word games” with what I stated regarding what Crompton told Kathy & what the autopsy found 3 days later. Jason can’t stomach having his own word games turned back on him because Jason gets made to eat for his dinner, his very own pigshit mire that he likes to wallow in.
More hot air and bluster from this wine troll. Buster the clown still can’t produce hospital documents for the phony wine and treatments he claims.
C’mon Mr. Big Shot. put your money where your mouth is. Post these documents. We all want to see them.
BUSTER says: There’s twisted fuckers out there who think it is fun to fuck with people by playing mock debate games on the internet…There’s a sick website out there where people spend their day doing mental masturbation called “Skeptoid”…Jason is one of those fuckers…
JASON says: You’ve been doing this for 10 years and you’ve been banned on many sites. You say you are here to “debate”. I’m posting documented evidence. You are trolling the documented evidence with conspiracy crap.
Post some real documented of “wine” and ” treatments” troll. Otherwise, we all know you are still a fraud who blows hot air. You’ve been doing this for 10 years.
BUSTER says: It’s more than clear that Flyswatter’s and my own cases match the evidence in a smooth and conforming manner while Jason’s is obviously a contrived troll screed that depends on deliberately ripping everything out of context and misinterpreting semantics…Anyone who steps back and asks whose case matches the evidence better will come in on our side…
JASON says: This is false and clear projection from this wine troll. You have zro evidence except for conspiracy crap.
I’m posting actual documented evidence that proved Jimi died from a drug overdose. So there is no “ripping out of context” when witnesses and evidence have alreaydy been documented and determined.
This troll is taking this real evidence and ripping it out of context with his conspiracy crap and the nonsense he makes up in his crazy head.
BUSTER says: Jason is trying to use his false 6 hour dead claim, and Siefert’s lie that they only worked on Jimi for a few minutes, to overturn a whole slew of incriminating evidence…But, once again, Jason violates the rules of evidence and debate in his dishonest forcing of false claims…
JASON says: How can it be false that Jimi Hendrix was dead for 6 hours? You agree with Crompton that Jimi died no later than 5:30am. 6 hours later makes it 11;30 before Jimi reached the hospital. So, you are debunking your own timeline as you change your stories again cuz you’re a troll. What a dumbass.
You are a lying fraud since Bannister and Brown said Jimi was dead for many hours before.
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. I personally think he probably died a long time before. He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of somebody who had been dead for some time.” – ex Doctor Bannister
“The man had been dead some time. The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Doctor Bob Brown
JASON says: Both doctors said Jimi was dead for many hours so it is not false what I’ve posted. Your pal Bannister and Brown debunk you since they both said Jimi was dead for hours. Also, Brown said nothing about your imaginary wine.
So, now you are trying to claim Jimi was alive when he reached the hospital. You are a troll with zero credibility.
BUSTER says: Jason has already been told that the determination that Jimi was dead for 6 hours hadn’t been made until 1991 when Dr Crompton examined Dr Teare’s autopsy of Jimi…Jason knows this but he keeps ignoring it and entering the false claim that Siefert and Bannister knew Jimi was dead for 6 hours when they received him…Jason is violating the rules of evidence because he tells us to go ask any hospital if they would treat a 6 hour dead body?…But that isn’t an accurate question because Siefert and Bannister did not know Jimi had been dead for 6 hours when he showed-up…The real question Jason is avoiding is asking any hospital if they would do their best to revive such a person not knowing how long he was dead?…It was Dr Bannister who answered that when he said “We did what we would do with anyone in those circumstances”…
JASON says: Buster has already been told his fake hoax story is bullshit. All the doctors viewed Jimi Hendrix dead on 9/18/70 and determined that he was already dead for several hours. That is the job of a doctor, you idiot. Crompton was not there in 1970 and would have now way of knowing unless it was documented by St. Mary Abbots in 1970, you dumbass.
This is why there is no documentation for any phony “treatments” for Jimi Hendrix cuz he was already a dead 6 hour rotting corpse from a drug overdose. Like Siefert said noting was done cuz he was already dead. Even both ambulance men said Jimi was already dead at the flat and nothing could be done for him.
Buster wants us to believe in a science fiction movie where doctors have no clue the patient has been dead for many hours. Buster aka Brian Doyle is a total joke and we laugh at his stupidity as his hoax is in ashes.
BUSTER says: Jason is using deceptive language and logic when he uses Dr Siefert’s lie as the one and only guide to Jimi’s treatment…The reason Siefert and Bannister attempted to save Jimi is because they usually relied on the ambulance men as their first level of triage…If a body had been dead for 6 hours the ambulance men would have called it at the Samarkand once they had the police there…The ambulance men even said they packed Jimi off to hospital in order to save paperwork…The true determiner Jason is avoiding is that most cases like Jimi assume the 999 caller is trying to help a struggling person so the doctors continue that process with their emergency intervention…So once Jimi showed up at their doorstep Siefert and Bannister simply assumed the victim passed triage and went right to trying to save him…This is what happened…I’m sure this asshole Jason will go in to his carnival barker con man mode in his answer and hail to his imaginary audience, but he won’t post anything to change these facts that clearly back us and not him…
JASON says: Another bogus commentary from this troll with absolutely no evidence and just toal bullshit he makes up. Nothing backs you as you are posting bullshit tats been debunked.
Both ambulance men said Jimi was dead and so did Officer Smith. Jimi’s bowels spilled all over the ambulance proving he was dead for a long time. Siefert and Bannister already knew this.
“We felt for any pulse between his shoulders, pinched his earlobes and nose, showed a light in his eyes, but there was no response at all. I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. You get a feel for it, I can’t explain, but you do and I knew he was dead.” – Reginal Jones
“When we got him to the hospital, full lights and sirens, we had to clean the ambulance out, it was really a mess, his bowels and bladder, all that goes when you’re dead.” – Reginal Jones ambulance man
We knew it was hopeless. There was no pulse, no respiration. We got down to the flat and there was nobody but the body on the bed, we had to radio for the police from the van” -John Saua Ambulance man
“We went to a basement flat at Landsdowne Crescent. The ambulance men were there, but Jimi was dead.” -Officer Ian Smith
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior to coming to hospital….I personally think he probably died a long time before.” – ex Doctor Bannister
“The man had been dead some time. The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Doctor Bob Brown
JASON says: So, all these men knew Hendrix was dead . The ambulance men told the doctors Jimi’s bowels spilled in the ambulance and Brown and Bannister confirmed Hendrix was dead for hours.
You are a clown “Buster”
BUSTER says: Jason is a liar because, no matter what Siefert said, the Hospital Report entered in plain writing that Jimi was treated for a half hour from 11:45 to 12:15…Jason is evading giving any answer to the fact Platt got the Hospital Report from Mitch’s wife Dee Mitchell who was actively accessing the hospital records at the time…Since that half hour matches Bannister’s claim, as well as Monika’s saying they treated Jimi for a long time, that proves Bannister is the accurate truth-teller and Siefert is covering-up…Siefert was head registrar and legally responsible for correct information being entered in the Hospital Report…When he signed-off on the 11:45 to 12:15 treatment time that was entered on that report he confirmed it…There are no arguments past that…
JASON says: Post some documented evidence of this report Mr. Big Shot. You are a big “expert” so you should have this information. Post this documented evidence.
BUSTER says: Jason also lied about there only being dry vomit in Jimi and no wine…Kathy Etchingham got a quote from Dr Crompton that Jimi couldn’t have been breathing when he arrived at hospital because his lungs were full of fluid…Just the 400ml of free fluid Dr Teare discovered was proof enough that Jimi did not have only dry vomit as Jason lied…The reason Dr Crompton said Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid was because he looked at the Hospital Report and saw a half hour resuscitation attempt…Being a skilled pathologist Crompton knew right away that the half hour indicated fluid had been removed from Jimi’s lungs leaving that residual 400ml…And I would probably guess that Crompton may have even spoken to Siefert himself and gotten the true lowdown doctor to doctor where Siefert knew he dare not lie to the head London Coroner’s Office Pathologist…Gavin Thurston also corroborated Jimi having a large amount of red wine in his stomach, which is proof of unaccounted for wine because the blood alcohol content was too low to match it forensically…This is proof of a cover-up because Thurston and the Coroner’s Office then had a legal obligation to account for that unaccountable wine in their forensic determinations…In any case, despite Jason’s idiotic lies, we have now accounted for both the wine in the stomach and lungs Bannister spoke of…We have zero corroboration for Siefert’s lie of only treating Jimi for a few minutes…Plus we have evidence of Scotland Yard evading evidence by not seeking the nurses who would have confirmed Bannister…
JASON says: More hot air and no action. Post documented evidence of all this wine you claim Mr. Big Shot. we are all waiting.
BUSTER says: Jason is one of many assholes on the internet who, because of delinquent moderation, have been getting away with this kind of demented activity…The internet is a free for all of trolls and crazies and Jason is one of them…Jason bit off more than he could chew with us and the trolling he is obviously used to getting away with is blowing back on him as he realizes he’s met his match and is in the process of having his ass handed to him by two skilled pros whose evidence is now surrounding him and closing in for the kill…Jason’s troll screed isn’t working…The smoke is clearing and there stands Jason obviously realizing his pathetic lies aren’t working as they bounce off the solid fortress of our more than proven evidence that anyone can see he can’t answer in public…
JASON says: More bluster and hot air and still no documents of the imaginary wine.
A real expert could post documents with no problem.
You’ve posted no evidence except for made up crap and conspiracy junk.
You’ve posted no documented evidence for the imaginary wine you claim.
You have forever lost cuz you are peddling a debunked hoax.
I find great amusement in watching Jason’s foolish attempts at fencing with a stiletto. I just can’t figure if he suffers from a Don Quijote type cognitive dissonance or perhaps he has convinced himself that his febile and redundant juvenile Jedi slight of hand tactics of defending his positions have pulled the wool over the readers eyes.
Exactly, Meromeri….
Both Jason and Ivana are doing nothing here except coming across like they are chasing their own tails wanting to lick their own asses. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a greater pair of lovers and makers of lies anywhere on the web, like I’ve seen here with Jason and Ivana.
He’s trolling, that’s all…It’s an idiotic, infantile practice where you simply deny the opposition no matter how badly you have to violate the truth or facts…He’ll do it as long as he can still keep getting attention for it…
Dr Crompton told Kathy Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid because he saw the half hour treatment time on the Hospital Report and saw the resuscitation attempt entry on the Inquest report…He knew the 400ml of fluid in Jimi’s lungs is what they didn’t get during that resuscitation attempt, but had reduced it down to those 400ml after suctioning for 20 minutes…In other words Crompton made the exact same determination we did therefore validating it as an officer of the London Corner’s Office…
An article from “verywellmind.com”- Why People Believe In Conspiracy Theories. People believe in conspiracy theories when: They are on the losing side of a political issue. They have a lower social status due to income or ethnicity. They have experienced social ostracism. They are prejudiced against enemy groups they perceive as powerful. Lower educational status tends to be associated with higher levels of conspiracy belief. I totally agree especially with the last statement. Intelligent people have a healthy level of skepticism and can usually determine for themselves what is to be believed and what is a hoax. You are participants in delivering false information time and time again and you don’t seem to be able to sort fact from fiction. In your distorted version of the story subterfuge, deception and sabotage are the order of the day.
“Sister Ivana Sow says:
November 16, 2019 at 9:03 pm
I (Sister Ivana Sow) am a participant in delivering false information time and time again and I (Sister Ivana Sow) don’t seem to be able to sort fact from fiction. In my (Sister Ivana Sow’s) distorted version of the story subterfuge, deception and sabotage are the order of the day.”
^^ FIXED !!
Anyone can see Sister Ivana Sow is a lover and maker of lies just by the way she accuses others of that which she is guilty of.
Apparently Sister Ivana Sow has never heard it said “being in the minority never proves that you are wrong”.
Anyone can tell just by her referencing this garbage article, that she’s got the brain of a pissant & all she is really telling anyone is she doesn’t have the intestinal fortitude to stand apart as an independent thinker or think for herself and be willing to face reality.
(Well, hi again everybody! People all agree (except for a very small percentage of morons) that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose like the official record states. That in fact is always shown each time I refute a certain wine troll. Everybody read how Dr. Siefert clearly established that he did nothing for Jimi Hendrix in the resuscitation room since Jimi could not be saved. Jimi was already decomposing after being dead for 6 hours due to a drug overdose, but ridiculously, our wine troll tells us all these phony “procedures” took place. That’s good for a laugh, but Dr. Siefert put the kibosh on that nonsense in his brilliant testimony. In this Volume II we will look deeper into the testimony of Dr. Siefert and it’s meaning. I will also point out the clear and blatant fraud of a wine hoaxer who makes up blatant lies trying to discredit Siefert and adding false b.s. to his testimony. What a troll that clown is, but what do we expect, when he has no evidence and a few screws loose. No surprise there. So, are you ready to get started?)
“The Three Main Points That Always Destroys The Phony Wine Claims And The Hendrix Murder Hoax”
Point Number One, Volume II
By Jason
Entering now into Volume II, in our first main point, that destroys the phony “Hendrix Murder Hoax”. We continue to look at the testimony of Dr. Siefert and it’s importance. Siefert’s testimony is crucial, cuz it debunks all the fraudulent claims garbage hoaxers have made up for these ridiculous “treatments” that never occurred. Each time a troll hoaxer claims fake “treatments”, they will always be shown Dr. Siefert’s testimony that debunks their phony claim.
I noticed our hoaxer didn’t care too much for Volume I that continued to destroyed his hoax. The joker had the nerve to still call me a troll. Can you believe that? Here I am defending Jimi Hendrix and the real documented record and the moron says I’m trolling when he is the one trolling the real record with his fraudulent hoax that will always and forever be debunked.
But as we read his comments, he still continued to distort the real record with his made up garbage stories from his crazy head and also lied about what Siefert was telling us. So, we will knock that nonsense down here in Volume II.
The first point of business is to take care of what Dr. Siefert said when he “worked on Jimi”. The wine troll uses those words from Siefert and takes them way out of context by lying and claiming that means phony “half hour treatments” were performed. We can laugh at that, but it is serious business that a deranged nut is trying to fraudulently distort and destroy the official death of Jimi Hendrix by spreading bogus and outright lies for a decade.
We all know that Siefert never said anything about “half hour treatments” since he only pounded Jimi’s heart a couple of times as a formality. That was the entirety of the resuscitation attempt, cuz Hendrix was already a dead drug overdose victim for 6 hours. Wine hoaxers don’t like hearing that cuz it destroys their hoax, but the truth needs to be told, and their hoax needs to always be exposed for the fraud that it is.
Siefert clearly stated that Hendrix was only worked on for a few minutes. Fraudulent wine hoaxers have no business trying to lie saying “half hour treatments” were performed when this doctor said it never happened. These outright frauds have no evidence whatsoever to refute this man. They have no documentation to prove their fake claims. All they have is a couple of sentences in a book. That book does not document anything, since no documentation exists. If it did, it would have been publicly released decades ago. So, the wine hoaxers have no real proof for the phony claims they make. Siefert said it never happened and no documentation proves Siefert to be accurate in his statement. Hospitals document everything and no “wine removal” was ever testified to by any credible doctor and no documentation exists. This means these fake “treatments” never happened. This hoax has been easily debunked by Dr. Martin Siefert and hospital regulations.
“We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead. After we worked on Jimi – we didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix until later on.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Once again Dr. Siefert knocks down the phony claims of “half hour treatments” that wine hoaxers fraudulently claim. Siefert explicitly tells us nothing like that ever happened. Siefert said Jimi was only worked on for a few minutes. Jimi was a dead 6 hour corpse who was already decomposing from a drug overdose, so what more do these stupid wine trolls expect would be done?
Wine hoaxers use this quote from Dr. Siefert and take it way out of context adding their b.s. claims of a “half hour treatment”. The hoaxers see that Siefert said “after we worked on Jimi” and then lie they about what he was saying. Siefert was just continuing his comment where he said Jimi was only worked on for a few minutes. So, the wine trolls are debunked yet again cuz nowhere does Siefert say Hendrix was worked on for a “half hour”. Also, no documentation exists for “half hour treatments” since Jimi was a drug overdose victim. So, Siefert is telling the truth since no record of any “treatments” were ever recorded. Hospitals document everything so no documentation means no “treatments”. Wine trolls will always lose on this main point, since they have no documentation of their own to refute Siefert or the offical record. But what this does, is expose Fraud Bannister as the con artist creep that he is for making up these terrible lies of wine and pretending to be a hero trying to “save a dead 6 hour corpse”.
“We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Fraud Bannister is knocked down with this testimony from Siefert. All of Bannister’s lies dies when Siefert discredits him refuting Bannister’s fraud claims of “long wine removals”. Siefert was in charge and said it never happened. Jimi was a drug overdose victim, so the “wine removal” claims are bogus since St. Mary Abbots Hospital clearly confirmed in their statement that Hendrix died of a drug overdose. Wine trolls cannot refute or distort documented and offical statements from the hospital on the offical cause of death for Jimi Hendrix. Their fake “wine” and “wine removal claims” will burn forever in the fake “Hendrix Murder Hoax” dumpster fire.
Bannister was just an emergency room doctor and had no authorization to take control destroying the body of a man awaiting an autopsy. Also, there was no “wine drowning” or anything to remove since Jimi was a drug overdose victim. Jimi was confirmed as being dead for 6 hours, the heads of the hospital would never authorize any “procedures” to be done on a dead 6 hour corpse . Call up any hospital in the UK and ask them if they do long “half hour treatments” or “procedures” on a dead 6 hour corpse. They will get angry and hang up on you.
Even better yet, call up any hospital in the world or in the UK and describe this phony “wine hoax” about Jimi Hendrix to the hospital. Tell them the phony tales of these wine hoaxers claiming Jimi Hendrix, a dead 6 hour corpse, from a drug overdose, had a so called “wine removal” with imaginary wine from a fraud doctor. Tell them this fraud doctor said the “wine” that was inside the body was “dumped down the drain” before the pathologist Dr. Teare and coroner Dr. Gavin Thurston could examine the body and contents. The hospital would explicitly tell you this is a fraud story and would never happen at any hospital. Jimi died from a drug overdose, so we all know this is a hoax, but the hospital will confirm it for you. So go ahead my friends, make the call, and do it, and ask them all the questions you like. The hospital will make very clear that 6 hour long dead rotting corpses do not have “procedures done”. They are declared dead on arrival and then shipped off to the morgue just like Jimi Hendrix was in 1970. These fraud hoaxers changed history for their fake phony claims to fraudulently perpetrate this hoax.
Jimi Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival so that means nothing would be done. What could be done? Jimi was already dead and a drug overdose victim. Nothing can be done for a dead drug overdose victim, which is why Siefert only pounded his heart twice and ended it. Siefert clearly in plain English says, Hendrix was already dead and only made a few minute resuscitation attempt. Wine trolls need to face the facts and realize their scam is over, since everybody can read Siefert’s testimony knowing what he stated that debunks the wine trolls and their fraud stories.
“After we worked on Jimi – we didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix until later on.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Siefert first talks about the few minutes he worked on Jimi (not phony “half hour treatments” wine trolls lie about) and then he debunks another phony claim from the wine trolls. Wine trolls have lied saying that “doctors still tried to save Jimi since he was a major celebrity”. Well, that is a bogus claim and Siefert lets them know about it here. Also, if these wine trolls actually knew the real history they would know that Hendrix was a John Doe until he was identified. Siefert says that the hospital had no idea this was Jimi Hendrix until Gerry Stickells identified his body in which sources say was at noon when these phony “treatments” wine trolls claim were taking place. That also debunks their phony claim. So the hospital didn’t give any special preference to Jimi since he was an unknown man to them. Well, that’s another phony claim destroyed by Dr. Siefert.
“We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Wine trolls can’t refute this documented testimony from Dr. Siefert. He explicitly stated Jimi was only worked on for a few minutes. A “half hour” is way more than a few minutes, so their phony claims are debunked. Everybody reading along are nodding their heads in agreement. Nowhere does Siefert expand on his comments talking about a fake “wine removal” or assisting Bannister with “procedures”. Bannister is the only fraud to make those bogus claims. Dr. Bob Brown even stated no “revival was possible” since Hendrix was dead for many hours. Siefert is saying the same damn thing. Hendrix was already dead so nothing could be done. Jimi died from a drug overdose, so there are no “treatments” that could help a 6 hour dead drug overdose victim.
Wine hoaxers will start to snivel claiming there was “wine” and “half hour treatments” and that Siefert is lying and taking part in a “cover up” all cuz they are refuted. Ok, so where is this evidence of “wine” and a “wine removal”? There isn’t any cuz none exists. This is why wine trolls will always lose, but they sure can make up incredible stories of “wine” and “treatments” that never existed. They are hoaxers and can never produce real documented evidence for their phony claims. Remember, hospitals document everything and if their claims were legit they would easily provide us with documentation. They don’t have any of that, so we get crazy stories and long winded rants from a lunatic instead of real proof.
Where is a medical document stating “Jimi was covered in wine”? St. Mary Abbots Hospital by law has to document this on Hendrix’s medical file. No documentation of this exists which means it never happened. Jimi was not “covered” in wine since nothing recorded says he was. Where is the medical document stating Jimi had a “half hour wine removal”? No documentation of this ever exists, which means it never happened. Hospitals document everything, and there is no documentation of Jimi being “covered in wine” or had a phony “wine removal”. Jimi was a victim of a drug overdose, the fake wine claims didn’t start until 1992 so that’s why there is no documentation cuz nothing about wine ever happened in 1992. Wine trolls have no documented evidence to claim otherwise.
“I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Well folks, this was the entirety of the resuscitation attempt on Jimi Hendrix. Siefert pounded Jimi’s heart a couple of times and that was it. He was already dead and decomposing after 6 hours from a drug overdose so nothing more could be done. What can you do to treat a dead drug overdose victim? Nothing. That’s exactly why Siefert did nothing more for Jimi.
Wine trolls get outraged at Siefert’s testimony and call him a liar or say he is taking part in a “cover up”. The trolls have no evidence of a fake “cover up” since there was nothing to cover up. They also have no documentation to refute Siefert since there never was any wine or a fake “wine removal” so they are forced to lie making up b.s. stories to fuel their debunked hoax. Rather pathetic, but this is what they live for, it feeds their soul to lie claiming Jimi was “murdered” making up fake stories and bogus claims as they go along. These jokers have a few screws loose, but everybody laughs at their deranged conspiracies. Buster the clown has been at it for 10 years and still hasn’t been able to prove anything.
Hi Jason. The ridiculous wording that Buster etc is coming up with like assembling the evidence as if he is some sort of grand prosecutor preparing for a court case or a detective gathering information like
Poirot. The fantastical claim that Jimi was worked on for by the doctors after he had been dead for 6 hours when he was clearly beyond help and would never have been able to be resuscitated is just bizarre. Hoaxers need to push this wine story at whatever cost because without it that have nothing to pin their dubious claims of waterboarding on. Buster is just another serial tin foil hatter and nothing more who hides behind a number of pseudonyms waiting to dupe others with his rhetorical language and deceptive scenarios.
TRANSLATED: Theses two lying assholes (Jason and Ivana ) still can’t answer:
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) claim?****
These two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) know what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, is both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) knows it debunks their “no treatment was done” hoax.
Autopsy report states no external signs of violence. If Dr. Teare had suspected foul play then he would have reported it and having found none he then concluded that cause of death was inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication after his thorough examination. Dr. Crompton then confirmed this by stating that Jimi could not have survived because of the toxicity of the barbiturates he took. Like Jason said the resuscitation attempt lasted a short while in keeping with hospital protocol this was not done in order to revive Jimi as this was impossible on a long dead corpse. It was done merely for the sake of completing whatever forms were necessary.
Well, there’s Jason just re-confirming our victory…If you put a meter on Jason’s entries you’ll see the more truth he knows he’s lying around the more of a build up of bullshit he has to do to get around it…Jason is reduced to even thicker deliveries of his juvenile denial trolling to make up for evidence he knows he can’t give any credible response to…
Like a cornered rat, all Jason has is desperately repeating his same misrepresentations of quotes in order to cling to them against the obvious…Since there are layers of witnesses and evidence showing Siefert is lying when he says they only worked on Jimi for a few minutes, and Jason only has one quote, that means Jason can’t answer the preponderance of evidence that proves our case…
Jason tells us to listen to Dr Siefert, but then when Siefert is quoted saying “Jimi was covered in red wine” Jason acts like a 4 year old and tells us that Siefert never said that…Siefert said it and it is captured on video tape…However since Jason is a slithering servant of Satan and his lies he’s trying the pathetic wiggling out of that comment by saying it doesn’t exist…So what this trolling asshole Jason is saying is that he has a right to call everyone liars and then enter an outright idiotic lie in order to get out of evidence he knows refutes him – and then on top of that we are asked by Jason and the host of this website to accept it as equal free speech…In the meantime, back on the sound, refreshing ground of healthy reality that Jason tries to escape in public, documentarian David Kramer has Dr Siefert on video tape from his interview in the 1990’s saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…Trolling, lying Jason says this is a lie and Kramer’s mention of it is yet another crazy coming in to hoax the subject against Jason’s sincere pleading for truth (even though Kramer is a famous Hendrix documentarian and Jason is just a sleazy internet troll)…
So once again what we have here is Jason working up a huge trolling dialogue of phony speech-making to an imaginary audience (the real audience thinking he’s a trolling jackass) in order to compensate for his not being able to answer this real evidence in public…Since Jimi had only a trace blood alcohol content Jason knows that the wine Dr Siefert witnessed did not fit any accidental drug overdose choking on vomit scenario…It was obviously wine that spilled over as Jimi’s murderers forced wine down his throat…If anyone reads Jason’s denial script above you can see him subconsciously struggling with his obvious realization of this and how it proves Jimi was murdered…Siefert was also struggling with this which is why he made the egregious lie in public that he only worked on Jimi for a few minutes…When Siefert said that he was covering-up what he knew really happened in order to avoid being dragged in to a government murder…Intel did dirty work and discredited Bannister in order to undermine his truthful exposing of this…
We can cut this response short by simply pointing-out that Jason has failed badly to answer the fact that the Hospital Report clearly documented that Jimi was treated for a half hour…Jason fools himself that his concentrated repetition of his two main lies, that Siefert only worked on Jimi for a few minutes, and there was no wine, is serving to overcome the major preponderance of the evidence he can’t answer in public…However it doesn’t and that preponderance is evidence that Jason still hasn’t offered any credible response to…What is really happening here is Jason is clinging to a few strategic lies where he deliberately misquotes evidence out of context, but it still hasn’t overcome the evidence he is badly failing to live up to and answer public…It is obvious from what he writes that Jason doesn’t really believe what he offers and is enjoying the attention he gets for his nay-say trolling a little too much…
We’ve won because while Jason is telling us to listen to Dr Siefert he himself ignores Siefert when Siefert signed-off on the half hour treatment time listed in the Hospital Report…Bannister and Siefert wrote that report immediately after trying to save Hendrix so the information was as fresh and accurate as it could be…So while Jason is asking people to pay attention to his denial trolling he isn’t credibly responding to the fact Siefert verified the half hour treatment time by signing-off on it on the Hospital Report…As head registrar, Dr Siefert was seriously responsible for the accuracy of the information in that report…When he signed-off on that half hour on the report he confirmed it and no amount of lying by Jason will change that…
The person who interviewed Siefert and got that quote from him of only working for a few minutes on Jimi needed to ask Siefert about the half hour written on that report…The reason he didn’t was because Dr Bannister’s letter never made it to the interviewers thanks to a particular criminal who calls himself a Hendrix source named Caesar Glebbeek…What Flyswatter and myself are doing here is assembling the evidence that was never developed to the point it needed to be by Kathy Etchingham…If her investigation had developed and pressed the evidence we are arguing, at that time, and forced it with a lawyer it would have forced Scotland Yard to answer and investigate it like it failed to do…Jason is a scumbag who, because of his Satanic depravity, doesn’t mind arguing the side of darkness that takes deliberate advantage of evidence being deliberately unexposed by the criminal authorities…You’ll see Jason show up right on time wherever that evidence has been concealed by corruption and take full advantage of its criminal intent…
The lying asshole Jason thinks we don’t see him ignoring the fact Dr Crompton telling Kathy that Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid is refutation of his only dry vomit claim…You can’t have only dry vomit when the doctor of top credibility in the re-investigation verifies Bannister’s claim…Jason’s own words then verify the half hour removal time it would take to suction those lungs full of fluid and confirm the half hour listed on the Hospital Report…Dr Thurston then confirms it as well when he says Jimi’s stomach contents showed a large amount of red wine was imbibed…This asshole and nut Jason actually asks the public to take him seriously when he calls each and every one of these condemning witnesses liars or hoaxers…All determined by his trolling wisdom and say-so…
Jim’s lungs were not “full of fluid”. Nothing is written on Jimi’s autopsy report that states fluid in his lungs. It only states that Jimi’s lungs were congested which is what happen to drug overdose victims. No wine was ever detected troll. You were easily defeated in August and especially in 2020.
(Hey gang! Wine hoaxers still are at it again, providing fantasy fairy tales of imaginary wine and phony procedures to feed their delusional minds since any and all evidence refutes them. They enjoy burrying their heads in the sand hoping their phony tales can save them from the real evidence that refutes them. They are in a life struggle to not accept reality, hoping their fiction can keep themselves going without having to admit they will lose forever with no documentation they can ever produce to state their failed case. All they can do is swear at you claiming a drug overdose “didn’t happen”, when all the facts and evidence say a drug overdose did happen, since it is permanently recorded and can never be changed. The wine hoaxers are failed right off the bat, since they are trying to refute a drug overdose with imaginary wine they can never produce. Their claims are more phony than a 3 dollar bill with a mish mash of ridiculous plots that they change any chance they get. It is a joke and they look even more foolish each time they post. This excellent timeline with real documented evidence and testimony forever debunks and refutes all these fraudulent claims by these sniveling whine trolls who will always have nothin’)
“The Real Documented Evidence And Testimony That Forever Debunks The Fraudulent Wine Hoaxers And Their Phony Hendrix Murder Claim”: The Real Timeline
By
Jason
“Hendrix Murder Hoaxers” try to falsely claim Jimi Hendrix needed to have “life saving procedures” from the fraudulent convicted ex doctor Fraud Bannister. Jimi being a drug overdose victim, would need no “procedures” that could save him since he was already dead for 6 hours. How would a 6 hour long dead decomposing corpse awaiting an autopsy get to have “life saving procedures” when the body is already decomposing? Yet our delusional wine hoaxing friends, spin the tale of phony “treatments” on a 6 hour long dead rotting corpse believing it would come back to life. Maybe in a spoof, horror, or science fiction movie it would, but not in real life. Only the insane would think this could happen. And yes my friends, these wine hoaxers certainly are.
Wine hoaxers live in a false reality and try to push their fantasy fairy tales on to you with this bogus hoax. They don’t care how ridiculous their claims are, just as long as they can place Jimi having a “wine removal” with a fraud doctor who has no credibility. But as usual, they have no documentation to prove what they claim. They can only use second hand quotes and fake stories to spin their tales. We all know hospitals document everything and there is no documentation to prove what they claim of Jimi Hendrix . They will always forever be wrong, only trying to claim “it happened” with never having any real proof for their garbage.
By the time the ambulance men came to the flat, Jimi was already long dead for 6 hours and nothing could be done for him. How could a decomposing corpse be brought back to life with “life saving procedures”? This destroys the phony claims of wine hoaxers since we all know a long dead corpse that’s rotting would never require long “treatments”. Hendrix was a John Doe when he was brought into the hospital. Nobody knew who he was until Gerry Stickells identified him. So, the truth is when the doctors saw a dead decomposing body of an unknown man, they aren’t going to do “life saving procedures”. Even if they knew it was Jimi Hendrix, they would have the good sense not to pursue a futile effort in a several hour decomposing corpse.
We have documented testimony from both ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua describing what they witnessed and the condition of Jimi Hendrix when they both entered the flat.
“We felt for any pulse between his shoulders, pinched his earlobes and nose, showed a light in his eyes, but there was no response at all. I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. You get a feel for it, I can’t explain, but you do and I knew he was dead” – Reginal Jones Ambulance Man
“We knew it was hopeless. There was no pulse, no respiration. We got down to the flat and there was nobody but the body on the bed, we had to radio for the police from the van, and we couldn’t touch anything in the flat. As I say we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed.”- John Saua
Both men testified that Hendrix was already dead when they entered the flat. Hendrix was unresponsive to any of the examinations for vitals. Saua said it was hopeless and Hendrix was already dead which means there was nothing a doctor could do to help him at the hospital. This wipes out all the fake claims of wine hoaxers claiming Jimi “needed to be saved”. Jimi could not be saved since he was already dead for 6 hours. Nothing could be done for Jimi so nothing was done.
Since Hendrix was already dead for hours, that means Hendrix would be taken to the hospital and would be declared dead on arrival and then shipped off to the morgue like it was reported in 1970. St. Mary Abbots Hospital would not perform long “procedures” on a long dead corpse from a drug overdose awaiting an autopsy. What “procedures” could be done for a man that’s been dead for 6 hours from a drug overdose? Nothing could be done. Which is why Siefert did nothing besides the basic resuscitation formality.
“Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.” Daily Telegraph 9/19/70
As reported in 1970 by major media outlets, Jimi Hendrix was declared dead on arrival. Notice how it says by ‘attending doctors’, which means this corroborates what Siefert testified to that he did nothing for Jimi Hendrix since he was already dead. The Daily Telegraph states that “doctors pronounced Hendrix dead on arrival” which means that no “procedures” ever took place on that day. See, this is the real factual accounts that is etched in history, not the fake bogus alternate claims that came post 1992 from Fraud Bannister. Bannister was an attending doctor and said nothing to the Daily Telegraph about his so called “treatments” on 9/18/70 cuz it did not happen on that day. His phony claims came 21 years later. If any so called “treatments” took place, the attending doctors would have stated that to the Daily Telegraph. They only said they declared Hendrix dead on arrival. Wine hoaxers have no answer for this, but they will indeed spin some bullshit as always. You can count on it. But as always, they will never have any real documented evidence to prove their fake alternate claims, only hot air and useless words that mean nothing.
“Hendrix, 27, was found dead of an apparent drug overdose in a London apartment rented by 23-year-old Monika Dannemann, a beautiful German blonde.
Hendrix reportedly took several pills while suffocating on his own vomit according to hospital sources.” – Daily Telegraph 9/19/70
Just like all the media reports from 9/18 and 9/19/70 it was reported that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose just as St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed in their official statement.
The Daily Telegraph reported that Jimi Hendrix was found dead from a drug overdose at Dannemann’s flat. Then the article correctly stated that Jimi took several pills and suffocated on his own vomit like the offical record confirmed. Now, this was reported even before the inquest and the hospital still got it right through forensic analysis of the vomit to determine what drugs Hendrix took.
Notice how the article clearly states ‘hospital sources’. So, St. Mary Abbots Hospital told us on 9/19/70 in this article, that Jimi suffocated on his own vomit due to a drug overdose.
Here’s where the wine hoaxers phony claims are destroyed. The hoaxers are claiming all this “wine” and phony “wine removal procedures”. Where are their phony claims coming from the hospital? Why didn’t the hospital state there was all this “wine” and “wine removal procedures”? The hospital said nothing to the press about their phony wine claims. Not one single word. If what the hoaxers claim happened, the hospital would have stated it. The hospital said it was a drug overdose and death from inhalation of vomit just like the official record confirms. The phony wine claims started decades later in 1992. There was no wine involved in Jimi Hendrix’s death, that’s why there was no documentation or reports about it in 1970. This is actual documented evidence from 1970 refuting the decades later phony wine claims that proves no wine ever existed.
“We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”- Official St. Mary Abbots Hospital statement on Jimi Hendrix’s death
St. Mary Abbots Hospital makes it official in their statement to the media and the world that Jimi Hendrix died froma drug overdose. Not one mention of any fake “wine” from St. Mary Abbots Hospital on 9/18/70. Bannister was the doctor who pronounced Hendrix dead and he signed off on the statement since he determined the cause of death
to be a drug overdose. 21 years later he started claiming “wine” after he read the book Electric Gypsy cuz he thought he was going to be sued again for medical malpractice. Fraud Bannister was already being investigated at this time for corrupt practices as a medical doctor. Just a couple of months later, he was convicted of 3 counts
of fraud and was struck off the medical register for good. So, why didn’t Fraud Bannister state to the media in 1970 all the “massive wine he claimed in 1992? What about all those phony “procedures” he claimed in 1992? Why didn’t he tell the press about all the imaginary wine in 1970 when he is claiming it decades later? The simple answer is that he is lying and making phony after the fact claims in 1992. In 1970, it was determined to be a drug overdose just like all the evidence proved. Nothing about wine was ever stated or documented in 1970.
Only after 1992 did the fake wine claims start. Same with all these frauds who made these conspiracy claims in books. Not one word about anything in 1970 or thereafter, only after 1992 and years after did all these incredible stories come out. That’s how
you know it all a hoax. Everything in 1970 showed this to be a drug overdose due to inhalation of vomit and these wine trolls have no evidence to prove their fake claims. Everybody reading are nodding their heads in agreement.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Everybody knows this testimony by heart from Dr. Siefert. The doctor confirms for us that Hendrix, a drug overdose casulty, was already dead like the media and hospital already stated and there was nothing he could do for him. Not one word about any fake “procedures” was testified to by Dr. Siefert. That means nothing was done. But we have a lunatic wine troll claiming Siefert signed off on all these fake “procedures” that this lunatic makes up in his crazy deranged head.
Folks, does Siefert talk about “signing off on procedures”? All together now…..No! Is there any documented reports of these phony procedures? Let’s say it again….No! Is there any documented evidence or reports about wine in 1970? One more time…No! Siefert stated nothing about procedures, no medical reports of “procedures” exist, nothing about wine was ever documented. There are no procedures that can be performed on a dead 6 hour drug overdose victim. This deranged wine troll can repeat his crap for another 10 years and it still isn’t going to be true. This fraud has no medical documents to prove his fake claims. Jimi died from drug overdose and every medical document proves it. Wine hoaxers are always defeated on that simple fact.
“I happened to be in the casuality at St Mary’s Abbott when Jimi Hendrix was brought in.
The man had been dead some time. The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
Dr. Bob Brown is officially on the record stating that Hendrix was dead for a few hours before he arrived at the hospital. This backs up both ambulance men and their testimony when Hendrix was already dead at the flat. Brown’s statement also backs Siefert where Brown specifically said that no “revival was possible” since Hendrix was dead for hours and decomposing. Nowhere does Brown talk about “procedures”, “treatments”, and anything about “wine”. Not one word about wine from Dr. Bob Brown. Brown clearly said Hendrix died from an overdose and nothing about wine was ever spoken by Brown. Hoaxers lose once again when their imaginary wine is nowhere to be found or testified to by an actual doctor who witnessed Hendrix first being wheeled in. Not a word about wine from this doctor. Brown confirms it was an overdose like the official record states.
“The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital”- Ex Doctor Bannister
Fraud Bannister is on the record stating Hendrix was already dead and decomposing when he reached the hospital. A man in this condition would not be having “long life saving procedures” performed in any hospital. Bannister proves himself to be a fraud describing a body in this condition and then later on claiming “he was working hard to save his life”. Anybody with common sense wouldn’t believe this shit and this is the crap hoaxers want you to believe. Bannister discredits himself and clearly shows he is incompetent and proves it was necessary for him to be struck off the medical register for being unethical. No doctor would be doing anything to a dead rotting corpse.
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”- ex Doctor Bannister
Bannister stated on record that Hendrix was already dead on arrival and no “procedures” were ever done on Hendrix and any attempt to resuscitate him was a formality. So, Fraud Bannister in this rare moment of truth, backs Dr. Siefert clearly stating that no “procedures” were performed on Hendrix, and it was only a formailty to resuscitate him. So, all 3 doctors make this same exact point that nothing was done for Hendrix. Wine trolls ignore this statement that destroys their hoax and pretend it doesn’t exist. Bannister does indeed refute all their bullshit as he backs Siefert’s testimony. It’s a shame Bannister had to lie about his fake wine claims. So, a dead man in this condition would never have “procedures” performed on them and Bannister said it was a formality like Siefert said. Sorry wine trolls. You lose again.
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival.” – Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s public relations manager
Jimi’s public relations manager Les Perrin stated to the media that Jimi Hendrix was certified to be dead on arrival at 11:45am. This is very important and also destroys the phony claims of these wine trolls. Perrin told us that Jimi was declared dead at 11:45. He received this information from St. Mary Abbots Hospital so he could inform the public. Since Hendrix was dead on arrival, that means no “procedures” were performed on a legally declared dead man. That is what dead on arrival means, so this totally destroys all of the fake procedure claims by these wine trolls. The press reported this as well cuz they received the information from the hospital. So, everybody knew Jimi was dead on arrival and these wine troll hoaxers try to change the events of history, but this documented evidence always will destroy them. This exactly confirms what Siefert and Bannister stated when they did nothing for Jimi Hendrix, cuz he was already dead, and any attempt to resuscitate was a formality. This statement from Perrin confirms the doctors and the media reports.
“Dr. Teare stated that Hendrix’s blood alcohol content was 100mg per 100 ml which was
enough to fail a breathalyzer test.
Teare stated that analysis of Hendrix’s blood revealed a mixture of barbiturates consistent with those from Vesparax.
Dr. Teare determimed Hendrix’s cause of death to be Inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication.”- The Guardian 9/29/70
So, Dr. Teare determined Jimi’s death to be an inhalation of vomit due to a drug overdose which was barbituates. Nothing about being “drowned” or anything about “wine”. It’s always about drugs cuz Jimi died from an overdose as confirmed and documented. These wine trolls are full of shit, and they are fully destroyed cuz no massive wine ever showed up in forensic analysis in the autopsy. Wine would be detected if there was. Real forensic science will always destroy these phony bogus claims from hoaxers.
“The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication,
but there is no evidence as to intention to commit suicide … If the question of intention
cannot be answered, then it is proper to find the cause of death and leave it an
open verdict.” – Dr Gavin Thurston
Finally, we have the final nail in the coffin for the wine trolls when Dr. Gavin Thurston confirmed Jimi died of a drug overdose. Thurston said the word ‘clearly’ to emphasize it was an inhalation of vomit due to drugs. Again, not one damn word about wine in the final report that destroys this wine hoax.
The “open verdict” was left open cuz Thurston couldn’t make a determination if Hendrix
intended to commit suicide. Wine trolls use their fake “murder claims” for the open verdict
but Thurston makes himself perfectly clear in his final report. No wine was ever stated by
Thurston which destroys the bogus claim by fiction writer Sharon Lawrence.
What we have here folks, is a perfect accurate timeline of Jimi’s death with documented testimony and real forensic evidence, that proves it was a drug overdose like the official record states. We have witness testimony at the flat by both ambulance men who stated Hendrix was already dead. The Daily Telegraph reported that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival, as so did Les Perrin, that confirms no phony “procedures” were performed on a legally declared dead man. They also reported that hospital sources said Hendrix died from a drug overdose due to inhalation of vomit. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed to the media that Hendirx died from a drug overdose which Bannister signed off on. Dr. Siefert testified that nothing was done for Hendrix as all the media stated he was dead on arrival. Bannister even said resuscitation was a formality. Brown said nothing about wine and also confirmed no “procedures” ever took place. Wine hoaxers cannot refute or distort any of this testimony and evidence since these are all documented facts that perfectly dovetails. All they are left to say is “it’s a lie”, a “cover up” or to make up their bullshit phony claims. These morons are pathetic and we all laugh at them cuz they got nothin’.
If they want to claim a “cover up”, then they are going to have to claim the ambulance men, the doctors, the hospital, and the media were all in cahoots in this big grand conspiracy together which is all a total farce. The Wine hoaxers have no evidence and only phony claims. History and documented evidence will always destroy their phony hoax forever.
All this documented testimony and documented evidence from forensic analysis proved Jimi Hendrix to be a drug overdose victim. The evidence hasn’t changed in 49 years and it never will since it is rock solid and forever etched in history as the facts. Wine troll hoaxers can snivel and whine all they like, since no real evidence will ever prove their phony claims to be correct. They got nothin’ and they will always be refuted since all they have are phony made up nonsense. Thanks for reading along folks, the truth will always prevail over the outright fraud the wine hoaxers push.
TRANSLATED: Jason still can’t answer:
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) claim?****
Jason knows what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, IS both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) knows it debunks their “no treatment was done” hoax.
“Folks” – Jason continues his tent preacher platitudes as if he were addressing some imaginary audience…There is no audience out there and Jason cannot use words to normalize his devious intent…
Somewhere in destiny’s future Jason has an appointment with God because a person as dedicated to evil deception and lies as he is, who invokes a solemn appeal to the truth, is a person who has just created an unavoidable meeting with divine judgment…
Jason makes himself easy to defeat because he lies so badly that you don’t have to say much to counter it…Jason once again shows us that the more truth he sees the bigger the volume of BS he needs to construct to deny it…
Jason quotes Dr Bob Brown above but doesn’t mention that Brown used the word “supposition”…That word is very important because the true context Jason deliberately avoids mentioning is that the quote he offers from Brown was from the 1990’s or in 2009 when he was commenting on the controversy caused by Bannister’s claim…What Jason is avoiding honestly mentioning is that, from his specific wording, Brown is obviously saying Jimi was supposed to have died from a drug overdose but the true cause was something else…By making this false disinformation case above Jason is dishonestly avoiding discussing the true context of what he quotes…It is clear from Brown’s comment that he is subtly saying that the wine he mentioned when he said “Jimi had obviously had too much to drink” was the same wine that Dr Siefert mentioned when he said “Jimi was covered in red wine”…No matter how many words Jason uses to lie around what he knows to be true, he still hasn’t honestly answered the better evidence and it isn’t going away just because he tries to BS around it…If Siefert saw Jimi covered in red wine then Brown did too and that was what made Brown say Jimi obviously had too much to drink…Jason tries to befriend the readers by means of his con man use of “folks” and “friends”, but anyone can see he is asking them to believe easily-seen lies and has no respect for them…In short those people Jason is appealing to think he is a ridiculous troll and asshole…Jason isn’t really interested in what they think in his con man hustle…Who is the “gang” this poisonous lying asshole is calling to?…
The next dishonest outrage Jason commits is referring to Dr Teare’s illegal estimation of a 100mg blood alcohol content, at time of ingestion of the pills, as proven…Jason is intentionally lying here in order to taunt the truth-tellers…Jason has been repeatedly told that Dr Teare wrote an annotation in the autopsy that he was “estimating” a 100mg blood alcohol content at time of ingestion of the pills…So Teare never measured that amount…This is all part of Jason’s smoke and mirrors approach because not only is that 100mg not scientifically measured, but it was attached to Monika’s timeline that was off by 6 hours…All Jason is doing here is disproving his own case by showing he intentionally lies about evidence and depends on offering deliberately false information to make his false case…Even worse, Teare entered that 100mg estimate because he saw the wine soaking Jimi, as well as the wine in his stomach, and knew the actually-measured 5mg blood alcohol content was too low…Jason is obviously offering falsely-spun interpretations of the evidence because he knows he needs to get around the truthful version I just posted…
The true context our case is based on is that Jimi was assumed to be a drug overdose and the conservative media in England was looking to make an example of the 60’s movement they were increasingly turning against in their coverage at the time…All Jason is doing is dishonestly quoting the rush to judgment moralizing that the ill-informed press offered at the time and dishonestly assigning studied reference to it when it was actually the lowest form of coverage…This is why it is easy to beat Jason because, while pretending to offer the best evidence, he is actually offering the worst and is deliberately seeking the least informed headlines instead of answering our proven facts…Jason is obviously seeking to exploit sources that did the least examination of the true circumstances and facts and by doing that is defeating his own case by violating the rules of evidence…By intentionally overblowing those deficient sources Jason hopes you don’t notice that he once again dodged answering Dr Crompton telling Kathy that Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…Or the half hour that his favorite source Dr Siefert acknowledged by signing-off on the Hospital Report that listed it…Dr Crompton totally refuted Jason’s previous lie that Jimi only had dry vomit in his throat and no wine…Jason thinks his overload of deliberate distortion of context trolling gets him around answering that, but it doesn’t and he fails to answer the best evidence once again…
Jason also deliberately misquotes the context of the doctors at St Mary’s…They were saying Jimi was dead in those quotes from decades later only because they were being questioned over whether they failed to save Jimi or not…Jason is deliberately distorting and lying when he intentionally misconstrues those quotes in to saying there was no resuscitation attempt…Jason is in pure dishonest contempt of the Inquest Report that indicated a resuscitation attempt was made…
Jason continues to deliberately lie by ignoring that the emergency room doctors assumed the ambulance men would triage all victims and if a victim were obviously dead they would screen them and not pass them along…What Jason is intentionally, dishonestly ignoring is that most ambulance cases involve persons who were reported by others and sent to hospital live while struggling with some medical emergency…So once Jimi passed triage with the ambulance men, the doctors assumed he was save-able and did exactly what Bannister said they did when he said “We worked on him like we would anyone in his condition”…Jason knows this is true which is why he ignores it and tries to get around it with so many obviously contrived misquotes…The half hour they took in that attempt was due to the “lungs full of fluid” Dr Crompton referenced and Jason publicly dodged…Jimi ended up at St Mary’s because the flat was empty and the ambulance men decided to help the cops avoid paperwork by shuffling Jimi off to St Mary’s…The fact their ambulance suction device failed to penetrate the hard plug of vomit only aided in that decision…
The cover-up is evidenced in Thurston’s wording…The Inquest was duped in to only investigating whether Jimi committed suicide or not…That way the dirty Inquest could be seen as helping Jimi from being accused of potentially committing suicide and be seen as sympathetic good guys instead of the murdering bastards they were…Thurston’s summation is proof of a cover-up because, as a forensic pathologist, Thurston had a legal and medical obligation to process the “fair amount” of red wine he told Jack Meehan was in Jimi’s stomach…Any “fair amount” would have to show up in the blood alcohol content, so therefore the trace amount that was actually measured would constitute a serious conflict in the medical evidence that required Thurston’s attention and follow-through…The fact that follow-through was never done is evidence of malfeasance and corruption of the autopsy and Inquest…Plus we have Dr Crompton saying Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid but then ignoring the more incriminating evidence by saying Jimi would have overdosed anyway (not true)…That’s the equivalent of saying “Yes he had a knife in his chest but he would have died from the fall anyway”…When Jason prefers Crompton’s excuse over the better evidence both he and Crompton are violating the rules of evidence and therefore proving our case…The more intelligent and skilled analyzer will realize Dr Teare did not believe his own 100mg estimate because he never entered any alcohol-related cause for the cause of death…If Teare believed that 100mg estimate he would have entered it on the record as was required (as Jason tells us)…The reason he didn’t is because he knew he couldn’t get away with it by his own rules and the true alcohol amount was only the measured 5mg…Jason only sees what he wants to see in the evidence he quotes…However Jason ignores the more incriminating evidence that is jumping out from those same quotes…
You have to treat Jason as the arrogant present day murderer of Jimi that he is…And may he receive what such persons deserve..
Hoaxers have created a parallel story to sit beside the actual story. This fair amount of wine that is spoken of so often did not warrant closer attention as it did not cause or contribute to Jimi’s death. We know that Jimi drank wine at the two gatherings but it was not substantial enough to override the actual cause of death. There was no actual cover up this is something that has been suggested by tin foil hatters disguised as evidence/fact in an attempt to mask the real cause of events that morning and to dupe the reader into believing that this what really happened. A perfect example of this is the doctors working on a corpse that was long dead for a half an hour resuscitation attempt. No doctor would attempt such a futile activity as the doctors all stated that Jimi was flatlined and beyond help as he was DOA and hospital protocol would have forbidden it. The use of rhetorical language, pseudoscientific jargon, phoney investigative analysis and derogatory language towards opponents all serve to make the hoaxer look credible when in truth it is nothing but a load of hot air. The truth is and will always remain that Jimi had a toxic level of barbiturate in his system which caused his death. If he had questioned what he was being given to help him sleep he most likely would have been around today. Tin foil hatters want to draw your attention to the wine because it serves their murder scenario when in fact the wine is irrelevant to the actual cause of Jimi’s death.
(Hi friends, everybody agrees (except for a very small percentage of morons) that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose like the official record states. Here we are in Volume III of this First main point that destroys the phony Hendrix wine and “murder” claims from the hoaxers. Siefert and his testimony does indeed refute all their bullshit cuz it proves that nothing happened. We have a dishonest and fraudulent wine troll who makes up blatant lies on purpose to further his debunked hoax and that’s what Volume III focuses on. It shows a desperate troll who distorts the offical record, testimony, and evidence while pushing garbage in its place. Real evidence will always refute this clown especially when nothing he claims can be used as evidence since nothing exists for his fake claims. It’s a futile effort, but he’s been wasting his time for 10 years getting laughed at and banned from many sites along the way. Hilarious indeed. Let’s pick up where we left off in Volume II as we begin a with new Volume III exposing this wine troll.
The Three Main Points That Always Destroys The Phony Wine Claims And The Hendrix Murder Hoax”
Point Number One, Volume III
By Jason
Dr. Siefert blew the lid off the wine hoaxers fake claims of phony “treatments” and “procedures” that never happened in his direct testimony. Dr. Siefert told us in very clear terms that nothing was done for Hendrix beyond the basic resuscitation formality attempt. Fraud Bannister also stated this as well in his rare moment of truth. But we have a deranged wine hoaxer who continuously peddles his own fake made up scenarios of “procedures” that never happened. What’s worse, is that the wine troll invokes the name of Dr. Siefert claiming the doctor “performed procedures” on Jimi, but we have Dr. Siefert telling us in documented testimony that nothing was done for Hendrix cuz he was dead. That’s the lies this Fraud has peddled for over a decade. The garbage he sells has been already debunked, but this clown is just looking for anybody gullible enough to believe in a total fraud sham theory that is a total joke. He’s been at it for 10 years now and still has never proved anything of any significance.
This wine troll attempts to ignore all the documented evidence and testimony that refutes and debunks his phony hoax as he peddles his garbage in his fake alternate reality scenarios. The joker has no real evidence to cite and just goes back and forth between his own made up crap and the junk he reads in his conspiracy books. According to him, this makes himself and “expert” and he types in an “authoritative tone” pretending to know more than anybody else. This is why we laugh at this clown who brings pure comedy gold. When he is asked to answer questions for his bogus claims, he refuses to do so, and continues to peddle the same debunked theories. Nonsense at it’s finest my friends. We now once again look at the direct testimony of Dr. Siefert who destroys the fake claims pushed by this troll wine hoaxer.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was
dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Dr. Siefert in his documented testimony tells us that no phony “procedures” or “treatments” were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix. Siefert tells us that Jimi Hendrix was already dead when he was hooked up to the monitor. So, as the formality of the resuscitation attempt, Siefert pounded Jimi’s heart a couple of times and that was it. Nothing more was done for Hendrix. We all can read what Siefert says and we can all read that no “procedures” were ever spoken about by Dr. Siefert.
No documented hospital medical records exist of any procedures performed on Jimi Hendrix. These records don’t exist cuz no procedures were ever performed. Siefert, the head doctor, never testified to any “procedures”. So in both instances, we have a doctor who tells us that no “procdeures” happened and no recorded hospital documentation of “procedures” exist. So, sane and rational thinking individuals understand that there were no “procedures”, since there is no hospital documentation and the head doctor says it didn’t happen. That’s simple logic folks, and it’s how things work in real life. Normal thinking people understand that perfectly.
We have a deranged wine troll hoaxer named “Buster the clown”, who continuously types that Dr. Siefert performed phony “procedures” and “signed off” on phony “procedures” for Jimi Hendrix. Where does Dr. Siefert in his testimony ever say he “performed procedures” or “signed off on procedures” for Jimi Hendrix? Siefert never said that anywhere in his documented testimony, yet this fraud hoaxer “Buster the clown” still continues to peddle this fraudulent lie. Not only that folks, this deranged crazy loon makes up his own fake scenarios of “treatments” in his crazy head that never even happened which he calls “evidence”. That’s what we are dealing with here folks, a total nut, and a blatant fraudulent attempt by this turd to push this fake conspiracy theory based on nothing but made up garbage by himself.
Since “Buster the clown” makes repeated claims of Dr. Siefert “performing procedures” without any documented evidence, we need to know where “Buster the clown” is getting his phony information from. So, where are you getting your “information” from “Buster” when you repeatedly claim Siefert performed “procedures” on Jimi Hendrix? You can’t get any “information” from Dr. Siefert cuz he explicitly says in his testimony that no “procedures” were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix. You can’t get any information or cite any medical records since no documentation exists of any of these phony “procedures” on Jimi Hendrix. That means no “procedures” happened since Hospitals document everything. So, when no medical records exist and the head doctor tells you no “procedures” happened, that specifically means these fake made up “procedures” did not happen. So “Buster”, since Siefert never testified to “performing procedures” and no hospital records exist of “procedures” on Jimi Hendrix, where are you getting your “information” from?
The conspiracy books that “Buster” reads in which he claims that makes himself a “foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix”, are not accurate since the authors have no documented records to cite either. No medical records were ever recorded for “treatments” on Jimi Hendrix and the head doctor said no “treatments” were ever performed. So, these books are perpetrating a hoax as well since there is no recorded evidence for the fake claims they make in their books. When you have no real documented medical reports, you can’t make up these b.s. fraudulent claims, but that is indeed what these fraud hoaxers attempt to do to alter the Hendrix history and change it to their conspiracy.
So, “Buster” has no real evidence he can cite for his fraudulent claims. All he does is peddle his fake scenarios that he makes up in his crazy head and calls that “evidence”. Sorry, that is not evidence, that is called fake stories which is fraudulent.
We all know that Jimi was dead for several hours from a drug overdose before he reached the hospital and his body was already in a decomposing state. This was revealed by Fraud Bannister himself, so that guarantees no “procedures” were performed on Hendrix when his body was rotting from a drug overdose. Jimi was legally declared dead on arrival which means St. Mary Abbots Hospital would not be doing “treatments” on him. No treatments exist for a dead drug overdose victim and this is why whine trolls will always lose their phony claims. Don’t forget that Les Perrin, Jimi’s public relations manager, confirmed to the media that Jimi Hendrix was declared dead on arrival. This is actual documented evidence that kills these phony claims from the hoaxers. So, all they can do is either deny it, play word games, or offer their b.s. fake claims as their alternative. Their fake claims are not evidence and doesn’t not exist so they are refuted right off the bat.
“Buster” the hoaxer doesn’t care how awful his claims sound or if he changes them from one post to the next. All that he is concerned with is to offer a fake rebuttal to the evidence that refutes him and that is his only goal. Well friends, that’s what you call a troll and it’s why “Buster” was banned from many sites and forums including Wikipedia and Amazon for trolling, spreading false disinformation, and making abusive posts.
A perfect example is what he is doing against Dr. Siefert. “Buster” knows full well Siefert never performed any work on Jimi Hendrix besides pounding his heart twice in a basic resuscitation formality attempt. There was no “signing off” on any fake “procedures” and Siefert never performed any cuz he said it never happened in documented testimony. “Buster” doesn’t care that Siefert says nothing like that happened, all “Buster” is concerned about doing is pushing his hoax and making up bogus scenarios in his crazy head. That is called fraud folks. “Buster” also doesn’t care that no real documented medical reports from the hospital exists either. All “Buster” does is point to his fake conspiracy books that has garbage claims of a “procedure” and he then claims it happened since it was in a book. Yes, that is weak and fraudulent but that is how he plays his game. But he will always lose when nothing ever exists to prove what he says. When he is confronted with the truth, “Buster” starts to melt faster than Frosty The Snowman cuz he is a total fraud.
As we end Volume III, we learn that our wine troll has no real evidence for his fake “Siefert procedure” claims. Making crap up on purpose isn’t real evidence, and it’s the reason why Buster the clown has failed for 10 years promoting his fake “Hendrix Murder Hoax”. Dr. Siefert testified telling us no procedures were performed on Hendrix and no medical reports ever exist of procedures. So, with that information, we all know no phony procedures were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix who died from a drug overdose like the official record states.
Hi Jason. This hoaxer isn’t interested in the truth he just loves making up sensationalist claims and the sound of his own voice. His rubbish belongs in the tabloids under the heading of fake new.
Hi Ivana,
Hilarious how this troll now claims “fluid”, but this information was known since 1970.
This troll just destroys his hoax more and more since Dr. Teare documented 400ml of fluid and found no wine absorbed in Jimi’s lungs.
All of this was already analyzed and documented in 1970.
Same long-winded blather by Jason that only tells anyone that Jason can’t answer:
In chapter 11 of Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”, Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that Jimi’s lungs were filled with fluid when he arrived at the hospital. Where did Dr. Crompton get that information if it wasn’t documented somewhere?
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) claim?****
Jason knows what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, IS both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) knows it debunks their “no treatment was done” hoax.
And after all this time, still no answer to Dr. Bob Brown stating that Jimi “had a bit too much to drink”, and Jason still has no answer for “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink if there was ‘no wine’ as Jason keeps claiming?”. And it has already been proven that Dr. Brown wasn’t citing Jimi’s autopsy report, as Dr. Brown would know from reading that autopsy, that Dr. Teare’s statement of 100mg BAC was only an ESTIMATE and that Jimi’s real BAC was .005%. No doctor anywhere in the world is going to refer to a BAC of .005% as being “too much to drink”.
You provide the long blather with you “Buster” alter ego.
Same old nonsense from this wine troll.
You are pushing the hoax. Documented and forensic recorded evidence drestoys your hoax.
Dr. Teare made public with the autopsy results in 1970 that Jimi Hendrix had 400ml fluid.
There was no wine detected in any of that fluid.
You and Fraud Bannister claim Hendrix had “treatments” and was sucked dry, yet fluid still remained for Teare to discover that had no wine….oops!
Brown was citing Teare’s autopsy report as cit’s been told to you many times.
This wine troll has nothin’ and can only repeat the same nonsense over and over.
You have no documented medial reports stating any treatments were performed and Siefert said nothing was done. Even Bannister said it was a formality.
You got nothin’ except to argue nonsense.
It is easy to beat Jason because he violates the rules of evidence and rules of science so badly…
He violates the rules of science because, while responding to Jimi’s lungs being full of fluid when he arrived at hospital, he says no wine was detected in that fluid…But Jason can’t get away with that because the rules of science require him to describe what non-wine “fluid” filled Jimi’s lungs exactly?…Once Dr Crompton said that to Kathy, as head Forensic Pathologist at the London Coroner’s Office, he committed to answering it…The Chief Coroner cannot make such a statement without being able to medically back it up because it involved a death…Crompton was not a man who spoke either lightly or recklessly on medical evidence…Jason is easy to beat because he’s used to stupid trolling on the internet and not being intelligently held responsible for it…But the intelligent discussion Jason categorically avoids requires him to then back up what non-wine fluid was Crompton talking about that filled Jimi’s lungs? It most certainly wasn’t Oedemic fluid because we know there wasn’t enough time for such an extreme medical condition…Jason has put himself out on a limb here but he is too dumb and too full of trolling recklessness to realize he has trapped himself…In short, he hasn’t accounted for what Flyswatter was actually saying, and wine or not he still hasn’t accounted for the time it would have taken for Crompton’s lungs full of fluid to be reduced to 400ml?…I dare say I think we already know that time and it just so happens to be a half hour…
What Jason isn’t answering is with a trace blood alcohol amount the wine Dr Siefert witnessed soaking Jimi had to be part of the fluid that was filling his lungs because we know there is no possible medical explanation for it…
Dr Bannister told me the lungs are like a sponge and there will always be some remnant amount…In any case, we know the remaining 400ml was a lot less than the original “lungs full” Crompton cited so the remainder had to have been removed by the attending doctor…
We’ve beaten you with this Jason and even though you respond by running around within the crooked pathways of your own credulous arguments, you don’t realize we have trapped and refuted you within the larger confines of the credible evidence you are failing to respond to…You’re failing to credibly answer the evidence here and once you do that you lose…
More absurd nonsense from this wine clown and he debunks his own hoax by himself.
Hilarious!
BUSTER says: It is easy to beat Jason because he violates the rules of evidence and rules of science so badly…
JASON says: “Buster” beats himself each time he posts, as he changes his fake stories and claims debunking each and everyone himself.
“Buster” still can’t produce any medical document stating wine was on or inside Jimi Hendrix.
He will always lose cuz no documented evidence exits.
BUSTER says: He violates the rules of science because, while responding to Jimi’s lungs being full of fluid when he arrived at hospital, he says no wine was detected in that fluid…But Jason can’t get away with that because the rules of science require him to describe what non-wine “fluid” filled Jimi’s lungs exactly?…Once Dr Crompton said that to Kathy, as head Forensic Pathologist at the London Coroner’s Office, he committed to answering it…The Chief Coroner cannot make such a statement without being able to medically back it up because it involved a death…Crompton was not a man who spoke either lightly or recklessly on medical evidence…Jason is easy to beat because he’s used to stupid trolling on the internet and not being intelligently held responsible for it…But the intelligent discussion Jason categorically avoids requires him to then back up what non-wine fluid was Crompton talking about that filled Jimi’s lungs? It most certainly wasn’t Oedemic fluid because we know there wasn’t enough time for such an extreme medical condition…Jason has put himself out on a limb here but he is too dumb and too full of trolling recklessness to realize he has trapped himself…In short, he hasn’t accounted for what Flyswatter was actually saying, and wine or not he still hasn’t accounted for the time it would have taken for Crompton’s lungs full of fluid to be reduced to 400ml?…I dare say I think we already know that time and it just so happens to be a half hour…
JASON says: The violator of science and evidence is this wine troll who distorts the real evidence with his bogus debunked conspiracy crap.
Fluid is not pure wine like you’ve claimed for a decade. Pathetic attempt at changing the script once again.
The fact remains is that wine was not witnessed by anybody at the flat.
The fact remains is that you can’t produce any documented evidence of a “wine removal”.
The fact remains is that you can’t produce a documented hospital report stating “Jimi was covered in wine”.
Hospitals document everything and you can’t produce this evidence cuz it does not exist.
This is why you will forever lose with your phony wine hoax as you bounce from one fake claim to the next.
BUSTER says: What Jason isn’t answering is with a trace blood alcohol amount the wine Dr Siefert witnessed soaking Jimi had to be part of the fluid that was filling his lungs because we know there is no possible medical explanation for it…
JASON says: No documentation exists of wine and Dr Teare never analyzed any wine on Jimi’s body or inside his body. This proves no wine ever existed which is why there is no documentation of it.
Jimi’s blood alcohol level was above the legal limit as documented by Dr. Teare so you vilolate the evidence once again.
BUSTER says: Dr Bannister told me the lungs are like a sponge and there will always be some remnant amount…In any case, we know the remaining 400ml was a lot less than the original “lungs full” Crompton cited so the remainder had to have been removed by the attending doctor…
JASON says: Since the lungs are like a sponge, the lungs would absorb wine if it was poured into Jimi as this fraud ” Buster” claims. That wine would never go away. The forensic analysis performed on Jimi’s lungs found no wine at all. This is what I’ve been saying all along. No wine was detected during the autopsy which means no wine was poured into Jimi.
Thanks for debunking your hoax once again “Buster” the clown. LOL
BUSTER says: We’ve beaten you with this Jason and even though you respond by running around within the crooked pathways of your own credulous arguments, you don’t realize we have trapped and refuted you within the larger confines of the credible evidence you are failing to respond to…You’re failing to credibly answer the evidence here and once you do that you lose…
JASON says: You’ve beaten yourself time and time again just like you did in this post.
You’ve debunked your own hoax and you still have no evidence of wine. This is hilarious!
Keep it coming.
We know who the troll who is making abusive posts is and it isn’t me…
Jason is obviously trying to delude himself that his deliberate focusing on the quote from Siefert, where he lies in order to try to get out of his real witnessing, is working…Dr Siefert was his own debunker when he, as head medical registrar at St Mary’s, confirmed Bannister’s half hour treatment time on the Hospital Report…Siefert was responsible for the accuracy of the information on that medical report and since it involved a death it had to be accurate…Dr Siefert and Bannister had just finished treating Jimi when that report was written up so they had the treatment time fresh in their minds when they entered “11:45 to 12:15″…Once Siefert signed-off on that half hour he refuted his “only worked on Jimi for a few minutes” lie…Jason thinks people are stupid enough to not realize Siefert gave that quote decades later after Kathy had raised some serious questions about Jimi’s death…Since Siefert was responsible for not addressing the evidence for homicide when it happened in 1970 he was covering-up and reacting defensively when he told that mis-truth…Jason doesn’t respect the readers and isn’t afraid to insult their intelligence in his troll screed…Siefert lying about Jimi’s treatment is a good sign that he was part of a cover-up back at the time when it happened…They went to the man in charge for the cover-up because he was the one who was medically responsible as head registrar…Jason just ignores that Scotland Yard deliberately avoided the nurses because they knew they would confirm Bannister…You can be sure if the nurses witnessed no wine and Jimi only being treated for a few minutes Scotland Yard would have rushed those nurses forward and had them speak…Jason thinks the readers are dumb and they won’t notice him dishonestly avoiding this…Because Jason is a lover of darkness and lies he makes Siefert the truth-teller and Bannister the liar – even though the facts are clearly saying the opposite…
Dr Crompton obviously had to get the information that Jimi was not breathing when he arrived at hospital because his lungs were full of fluid from somebody or somewhere…I would guess he may have phoned Siefert privately and Siefert told him the truth…If you read Jason’s name-calling troll screed above he once again avoids answering that Crompton’s confirmation of Bannister’s wine in Jimi’s lungs is proof that the wine was in Jimi’s lungs at the Samarkand and the ambulance men could not access it because of the hard plug of vomit…It disproves Jason’s lie that there was only dry vomit…
Crompton’s lungs full of fluid is confirmation of the wine by Dr Teare’s successor who possessed his autopsy sheets on Jimi…So if we go back to Jason’s own words in this thread he says it would take a long time for the doctors at St Mary’s to remove that volume of wine from Jimi’s lungs…Yes, that is correct and that long period is registered in the Hospital Report where it lists a half hour treatment time…
Jason knows this is true which is why he runs from it in public and refuses to answer…He knows he can’t answer for his lie that there was no wine and no resuscitation attempt…
The “Jimi was covered in red wine” quote from Dr Siefert, that Jason isn’t afraid to insult the intelligence of the readers by omitting, is the more meaningful quote that leads to the truth…Common sense tells you if Siefert detected so much wine that he described it that way, then Dr Brown saw that same wine, as well as the ambulance men at the Samarkand…Dr Crompton’s statement that Jimi arrived at St Mary’s with lungs full of fluid is a crushing sweep and slam dunk of Jason’s lies and that’s why he can’t answer it and can only respond with idiotic trolling…
“Buster” blows a lot of hot air but can’t produce any real documented evidence for the imaginary wine he claims. Another bogus comment full of made up lies and “cover up” claims since he has no evidence for his fake wine. All this clown can do is make up fake claims he can’t prove. The real evidence always refutes his garbage.
BUSTER says: We know who the troll who is making abusive posts is and it isn’t me…
JASON says: You’re the troll who was banned from many sites and forums. You’re trolling the real documented evidence that proves Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose with your phony conspiracy theory for which you have no evidence. 10 years and you still have nothin’.
BUSTER says: Jason is obviously trying to delude himself that his deliberate focusing on the quote from Siefert, where he lies in order to try to get out of his real witnessing, is working…
JASON says: “Buster” the troll makes up a blatant lie that Siefert lied with absolutely no evidence. Fraud Bannister is on the record telling you the resuscitation attempt was a formality. No documented hospital reports exist of any medical procedures performed on Jimi Hendrix. The hospital confirmed Jimi was pronounced dead on arrival which proves Siefert to be telling the truth. You are making up crap in your crazy head.
BUSTER says: Dr Siefert was his own debunker when he, as head medical registrar at St Mary’s, confirmed Bannister’s half hour treatment time on the Hospital Report…
JASON says: Jimi Hendrix was a victim of a drug overdose so no “treatments” could help him being already dead and decomposing. No documented evidence of a medical report exists of this phony “half hour treatment. Jimi Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival so no “treatments” were ever performed. You are reading a claim from a book that has no documented evidence
BUSTER says: Siefert was responsible for the accuracy of the information on that medical report and since it involved a death it had to be accurate…
JASON says: No medical report exists of Jimi Hendrix being “treated”. This troll just makes up lies in his crazy head. This is why he was banned from Wikipedia and Hendrix sites for pushing bogus claims.
BUSTER says: Dr Siefert and Bannister had just finished treating Jimi when that report was written up so they had the treatment time fresh in their minds when they entered “11:45 to 12:15″…
JASON says: No Hospital report exists of any “treatments”, wine troll. I’ve asked you to produce a report many times and you can’t. Siefert never “treated” Jimi cuz he testified that noting was done. Another blatant attempt by this fraud making up fake clams with no documented evidence.
BUSTER says: Once Siefert signed-off on that half hour he refuted his “only worked on Jimi for a few minutes” lie…Jason thinks people are stupid enough to not realize Siefert gave that quote decades later after Kathy had raised some serious questions about Jimi’s death…
JASON says: Siefert never “signed off” on anything since nothing ever happened. “Buster” is too stupid to realize that if these “treatments” took place, St. Mary Abbots Hospital would have stated they did on 9/18/70. What did St. Mary Abbots Hospital say on 9/18/70? Yeah, that’s right they confirmed it was a drug overdose. They also stated Jimi was declared dead on arrival. A DOA doesn’t get phony “half half hour treatments”, they get shipped off to the morgue like Jimi was. Call up any hospital in the UK and ask them what they do for a “dead on arrival”.
BUSTER says Since Siefert was responsible for not addressing the evidence for homicide when it happened in 1970 he was covering-up and reacting defensively when he told that mis-truth…
JASON says: This wine troll makes up more blatant lies. No evidence for homicide exists, only in his crazy deranged head . No wine was witnessed at the flat and not one medical professional that Kathy Etchingham spoke with ever said Jimi was “murdered”.
Again, this when troll claims a “cover up” as I predicted he would, when all the evidence refutes his bogus claims. This clown desperately tries to keep his hoax going and always has no evidence of the crap he pushes.
BUSTER says: Jason doesn’t respect the readers and isn’t afraid to insult their intelligence in his troll screed…
JASON says: “Buster” the wine troll said that “nobody is reading this” but now claims that I don’t “respect the readers”. So once again, this troll lies and contradicts his b.s. claims when it suits his needs.
Of course I respect the readers, which is why I always provide real documented evidence that confirms the official record.
“Buster” the wine troll disrespects the readers and most of all Jimi Hendrix, “Buster” wants Jimi to be “murdered”, as he continuously makes up bogus claims in his crazy head with zero evidence to prove. That is disgraceful.
BUSTER says: Siefert lying about Jimi’s treatment is a good sign that he was part of a cover-up back at the time when it happened…They went to the man in charge for the cover-up because he was the one who was medically responsible as head registrar…Jason just ignores that Scotland Yard deliberately avoided the nurses because they knew they would confirm Bannister…You can be sure if the nurses witnessed no wine and Jimi only being treated for a few minutes Scotland Yard would have rushed those nurses forward and had them speak…Jason thinks the readers are dumb and they won’t notice him dishonestly avoiding this…Because Jason is a lover of darkness and lies he makes Siefert the truth-teller and Bannister the liar – even though the facts are clearly saying the opposite…
JASON says: Another bogus conspiracy commentary from this clown with zero evidence. All the real evidence refutes him, so he makes up an alternate story of a “cover up” in his crazy head. If “Buster” had any real evidence for his phony claims, he would have produced it a decade ago instead of whining about made up nonsense like a fake “cover up”.
BUSTER says: Dr Crompton obviously had to get the information that Jimi was not breathing when he arrived at hospital because his lungs were full of fluid from somebody or somewhere…
JASON says: Jimi was already dead before the reached the hospital, moron. He was declared dead on arrival when he reached the hospital. So no, Jimi would not be breathing since he as already dead for 6 hours decomposing. This is part of the official record that you troll for your garbage hoax you push. Hilarious that a self proclaimed “foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix” that you call yourself wouldn’t know this important information that has been documented since 1970.
BUSTER says: I would guess he may have phoned Siefert privately and Siefert told him the truth…If you read Jason’s name-calling troll screed above he once again avoids answering that Crompton’s confirmation of Bannister’s wine in Jimi’s lungs is proof that the wine was in Jimi’s lungs at the Samarkand and the ambulance men could not access it because of the hard plug of vomit…It disproves Jason’s lie that there was only dry vomit…
JASON says: “I would guess” “Buster the clown” says as he makes up another fake claim with no evidence.
“Buster” the clown loses his phony wine hoax cuz no wine was ever detected in the forensic analysis of the fluid by Dr. Teare.
BUSTER says: Crompton’s lungs full of fluid is confirmation of the wine by Dr Teare’s successor who possessed his autopsy sheets on Jimi…So if we go back to Jason’s own words in this thread he says it would take a long time for the doctors at St Mary’s to remove that volume of wine from Jimi’s lungs…Yes, that is correct and that long period is registered in the Hospital Report where it lists a half hour treatment time…
JASON says: There is no documented reports for any phony treatments and removing a body full of wine with a small suction tube would take hours. Also, the fluid in Hendrix detected no wine at all. So, wine hoaxers are debunked yet again.
BUSTER says: Jason knows this is true which is why he runs from it in public and refuses to answer…He knows he can’t answer for his lie that there was no wine and no resuscitation attempt…
JASON says: “Buster” the clown knows he can’t produce any documented evidence for the imaginary wine he claims. If he had proof, he would have produce it, instead of blowing hot air. Produce documented evidence of “wine” “Buster”. Wine would be documented if it existed. Where is all the wine imaginary you claim
BUSTER says: The “Jimi was covered in red wine” quote from Dr Siefert, that Jason isn’t afraid to insult the intelligence of the readers by omitting, is the more meaningful quote that leads to the truth…Common sense tells you if Siefert detected so much wine that he described it that way, then Dr Brown saw that same wine, as well as the ambulance men at the Samarkand…Dr Crompton’s statement that Jimi arrived at St Mary’s with lungs full of fluid is a crushing sweep and slam dunk of Jason’s lies and that’s why he can’t answer it and can only respond with idiotic trolling…
JASON says: LMAO “crushing sweep and slam dunk”.
I’ve already stated this many times, but this troll lies and lies saying I never did.
Dr. Teare already made public in 1970 that Jimi had 400ml of fluid. That fluid detected no wine in the forensic analysis in Jimi’s autopsy.
If Jimi was “drowned in wine” as you claim, the fluid would have detected wine. No wine was ever detected anywhere on Jimi Hendrix, either outside his body nor inside during examination and analysis. Nothing about wine was written in any report. That debunks your phony hoax.
Also, no fluid should have been inside Jimi when his body was examined by Teare, cuz you claimed Jimi was sucked dry with a 30 minute treatment….oops…That again debunks your phony hoax.
So, just that alone destroys your phony hoax. 10 years and counting and you still got nothin’.
Siefert also stated that “ho detected no alcohol on Jimi. “Buster” has no documented records of anything about wine or anything else he can produce as he trolls the real evidence with made up garbage.
Produce a medical report stating wine “Buster the clown”.
You can’t do that!
Same long-winded lying, blathering garbage by Jason trying to make himself look sophisticated, but Jason makes himself look about as sophisticated as a piece of pigshit floating around in a public swimming pool.
The 400ml fluid found in one of the lungs at the autopsy was never reported anywhere to be tested for what type of fluid that it was & all Jason is telling anyone with his reference to it is that he can’t answer the following:
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) claim?****
Jason knows what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, IS both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) knows it debunks their “no treatment was done” hoax.
Keep wallowing away, Jason.
FLYSWATTER says: Same long-winded lying, blathering garbage by Jason trying to make himself look sophisticated, but Jason makes himself look about as sophisticated as a piece of pigshit floating around in a public swimming pool.
The 400ml fluid found in one of the lungs at the autopsy was never reported anywhere to be tested for what type of fluid that it was & all Jason is telling anyone with his reference to it is that he can’t answer the following:
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) claim?****
Jason knows what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, IS both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) knows it debunks their “no treatment was done” hoax.
Keep wallowing away, Jason.
JASON says: Says the wine troll who wallows in imaginary wine that doesn’t exist.
Wine is not documented anywhere and this troll can’t produce any documentation of wine.
This wine troll was claiming “wine” for years. Now he changes it to “fluid” which is not wine. No wine was ever detected in the forensic analysis of the fluid that Dr. Teare found and documented in 1970. You lose your phony hoax on this.
According to this wine troll, Jimi Hendrix had a “20 minute wine removal” by Bannister at the hospital. Jimi shouldn’t have had any fluid in him when his body reached Dr. Teare cuz this troll claimed Bannister sucked him dry…oops!
This means that no “procedures” or “treatments” ever happened just like Dr. Siefert testified to.
Another debunked hoax as this troll just does it to himself each time. LOL
JASON, the lying, denying pig-breeder just keep wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 20, 2019 at 7:16 pm
You and Fraud Bannister claim Hendrix had “treatments” and was sucked dry, yet fluid still remained for Teare to discover that had no wine….oops!”
At no time, anywhere, did I ever state that Jim was sucked “bone dry” at the hospital. Just another self-decreed fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass.
Jason just exhibits what a blatant liar that he is.
Anybody can go right to this link and read Bannister’s statements and see that Bannister never states any such thing either:
http://woodstockhendrix.gobot.com/about.html
Jason still has no answer for “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink if there was ‘no wine’ as Jason keeps claiming?”. And it has already been proven that Dr. Brown wasn’t citing Jimi’s autopsy report, as Dr. Brown would know from reading that autopsy, that Dr. Teare’s statement of 100mg BAC was only an ESTIMATE and that Jimi’s real BAC was .005%. No doctor anywhere in the world is going to refer to a BAC of .005% as being “too much to drink”.
The fluid WAS wine which was the reason Dr. Brown made the statement about Jimi having “too much to drink”.
Dr. Thurston told Jack Meehan on Sept, 29, 1970 that Jimi’s stomach contents revealed “a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed”.
Dr. Seifert was recorded on video by David Kramer saying Jimi was covered in red wine.
Dr. Teare referenced the wine in his autopsy report, because if there was “no wine”, as Jason claims, then Dr. Teare never makes any such estimate of 100mg of BAC at the time of Vesparax ingestion, nor would Dr. Teare have written that into his autopsy report. Jason still has no answer for this.
FLYSWATTER SAYS: JASON, the lying, denying pig-breeder just keep wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 20, 2019 at 7:16 pm
You and Fraud Bannister claim Hendrix had “treatments” and was sucked dry, yet fluid still remained for Teare to discover that had no wine….oops!”
At no time, anywhere, did I ever state that Jim was sucked “bone dry” at the hospital. Just another self-decreed fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass.
Jason just exhibits what a blatant liar that he is.
Anybody can go right to this link and read Bannister’s statements and see that Bannister never states any such thing either:
http://woodstockhendrix.gobot.com/about.html
Jason still has no answer for “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink if there was ‘no wine’ as Jason keeps claiming?”. And it has already been proven that Dr. Brown wasn’t citing Jimi’s autopsy report, as Dr. Brown would know from reading that autopsy, that Dr. Teare’s statement of 100mg BAC was only an ESTIMATE and that Jimi’s real BAC was .005%. No doctor anywhere in the world is going to refer to a BAC of .005% as being “too much to drink”.
The fluid WAS wine which was the reason Dr. Brown made the statement about Jimi having “too much to drink”.
Dr. Thurston told Jack Meehan on Sept, 29, 1970 that Jimi’s stomach contents revealed “a fair amount of red wine had been imbibed”.
Dr. Seifert was recorded on video by David Kramer saying Jimi was covered in red wine.
Dr. Teare referenced the wine in his autopsy report, because if there was “no wine”, as Jason claims, then Dr. Teare never makes any such estimate of 100mg of BAC at the time of Vesparax ingestion, nor would Dr. Teare have written that into his autopsy report. Jason still has no answer for this.
JASON says: YAAAAAAAAAWN!
This troll repeats this same crap over and over. I’ve already answered and debunked all this crap many times.
This troll still can’t produce any documentation of wine.
Jason is the best refuter of his own offerings…He says if it happened at St Mary’s then it would have to be documented…So Jason should have no trouble producing the “Dead On Arrival” documentation from the hospital…There is none because, although Jimi was dead on arrival, they didn’t give up on him until the half hour treatment time ended…Jason is lying when he says I have no evidence that Siefert was lying…We have the Hospital Report that lists a half hour treatment time from 11:45 to 12:15…Platt’s book was published in September 1990, which was before Kathy’s investigation…So he must have accessed the Hospital Report on his own…We also have Dr Bannister’s direct witnessing where he explicitly said he and Siefert treated Jimi for a half hour, and we have Crompton’s lungs full of fluid, which would necessitate a half hour resuscitation attempt…Just the opposite of what Jason says, we have several examples of converging evidence to show Siefert was lying…
Again, Jason is his own best refuter and if we follow his own demands we would find he cannot produce any documents to show Jimi overdosed…I’ve proven that a person like Jimi with a tolerance for barbiturates cannot overdose on only 1800mg of Secobarbital…Jason thinks the Black Bomber was the final straw but that is just Jason stupidly tossing that in there without realizing that a stimulant like a Black Bomber amphetamine would actually counteract the barbiturate and tip the scale in Jimi’s favor even more…All the documents Jason demands all say Jimi asphyxiated on vomit, only we know now that was wine because Dr Crompton confirmed it, despite Jason’s trying to squirm around it…
Jason is lying when he says no hospital report exists of any medical procedures on Jimi…That’s an outright lie because the Hospital Report says in plain language “Treatment Time 11:45 to 12:15″…That is proof that Siefert is lying and 5 bottles of wine were removed from Jimi as Dr Bannister said…Jason once again trolls around giving an honest answer to the fact that once Siefert signed-off on the half hour written on the Hospital Report he confirmed Bannister’s resuscitation attempt…Jason further lies by ignoring that the Inquest data sheet was a second document that confirmed Jimi being treated when it listed “Unable To Resuscitate”…That wording clearly means they did treat Jimi with an attempted resuscitation, the half hour time of which was entered on the Hospital Report…Jason can play trolling word games all he wants but the facts are resoundingly with us and we don’t need to enter any silly trolling to prove it…
Jason can’t answer how the nurses were methodically avoided in order to exclude their witnessing of the wine…Of course, being the servant of Satan that he is, he runs quickly towards the darkness this deliberate corruption offers…
Look at Jason flagrantly side-step answering Dr Crompton’s statement that Jimi could not be breathing when he arrived at hospital because his lungs were full of fluid…Jason’s caught here because he can’t attack Crompton and accuse him of being a fraud and liar like he attacks each and every other witness for the wine…So he flagrantly evades it and never gives any answer…Jason scoots out of that answer like the shameless troll he is without ever offering any answer why Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid or how they got that way from a borderline barbiturate dose that would not have killed him?…Or why Crompton even said that at all or where he got it from?…Nor does Jason offer a peep about how lungs full of wine totally destroys his trolling lie that Jimi only had dry vomit…Jason is clearly switching the subject to his 6 hours dead evasion in order to escape answering for the fluid…Jason would not be allowed to get away with that in a credibly moderated debate…What it really is is a concession of the point by Jason…
Jason refuses to answer the point about Crompton’s fluid in the lungs proving there was wine in the lungs at the Samarkand…He tries to wiggle out of it by doubling down and saying there was no wine detected in the lung fluid analysis…But once again, if we follow Jason’s own demands, there is no documentation for any lung fluid analysis…That’s because there was no such analysis and Jason is showing us he doesn’t really take his own claims for documentation seriously…Jason uses these trolling strawmen to get around answering the basic point…Why was there any lungs full of fluid in the first place, and what was the fluid, and how did it get there?…You can see Jason using these bogus excuses to get out of answering evidence he knows he can’t answer…
Jason is lying when he says it would take hours to remove wine from a body…We know how long it would take because we have the recorded and witnessed 20 minutes for 5 bottles worth…That right there tells you the capacity and rate of the suction tube…
I hope people realize that Jason is just an internet nut who found this comments section and in no way is he any credible or serious player in this business…Jason is scum from some degenerate dark corner of the internet and is only here because the room is unmoderated…As soon as Jason’s material was brought to a credibly moderated room he would quickly be banned…It is quite obvious Jason is playing trolling word games and focusing on semantics rather than offering serious debate…Any person of average intelligence can see he is avoiding the facts and obnoxiously pretending he is seriously challenging our case when it is plainly obvious he is just here for sick denial trolling…There’s a fine line between seeking the facts and seeking the excuses and we would quickly be spared Jason’s demented input as soon as this discussion were under the control of credibly accountable moderation…
More whining and lying from “Buster” the wine troll. Just more hot air and no documents from this wine troll. Hilarious indeed.
BUSTER says: Jason is the best refuter of his own offerings…He says if it happened at St Mary’s then it would have to be documented…So Jason should have no trouble producing the “Dead On Arrival” documentation from the hospital…
JASON says: This is already documented. The media reported that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival. Les Perrin, Jimi’s public relations manager confirmed it. All 3 doctors said he was confirmed dead on arrival as well. Jimi was already dead at the flat for many hours. But you ignore it since it debunks your hoax.
BUSTER says: There is none because, although Jimi was dead on arrival, they didn’t give up on him until the half hour treatment time ended…Jason is lying when he says I have no evidence that Siefert was lying…We have the Hospital Report that lists a half hour treatment time from 11:45 to 12:15…Platt’s book was published in September 1990, which was before Kathy’s investigation…So he must have accessed the Hospital Report on his own…We also have Dr Bannister’s direct witnessing where he explicitly said he and Siefert treated Jimi for a half hour, and we have Crompton’s lungs full of fluid, which would necessitate a half hour resuscitation attempt…Just the opposite of what Jason says, we have several examples of converging evidence to show Siefert was lying…
JASON says: There is no report that confirms any “wine removal” or “treatments” and you can’t produce one. Dr. Siefert and Brown both confirmed no “treatments” were performed on a dead rotting 6 hour corpse. Siefert had no reason to lie about anything and Brown backs him up with his own testimony. Nothing is stated anywhere about a fake “wine removal”. Since you are debunked, you can only pathetically say Siefert is “lying” cuz you are a troll. When this clown is refuted, he nay says the real evidence and cries a “cover up” or he’s “lying”. Pathetic indeed.
BUSTER says: Again, Jason is his own best refuter and if we follow his own demands we would find he cannot produce any documents to show Jimi overdosed…I’ve proven that a person like Jimi with a tolerance for barbiturates cannot overdose on only 1800mg of Secobarbital…Jason thinks the Black Bomber was the final straw but that is just Jason stupidly tossing that in there without realizing that a stimulant like a Black Bomber amphetamine would actually counteract the barbiturate and tip the scale in Jimi’s favor even more…All the documents Jason demands all say Jimi asphyxiated on vomit, only we know now that was wine because Dr Crompton confirmed it, despite Jason’s trying to squirm around it…
JASON says: This wine troll now make up more blatant lies. Dr. Crompton never confirmed anything about wine. This lunatic makes up another fake story in his crazy head. Hilarious.
All the evidence is already documented in Thurston’s final report, moron. You’ve proven nothing except for a bogus claim to say “drugs couldn’t have killed him it has to be wine”. Well, all the autopsy forensics debunk your garbage you peddle.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying when he says no hospital report exists of any medical procedures on Jimi…That’s an outright lie because the Hospital Report says in plain language “Treatment Time 11:45 to 12:15″…That is proof that Siefert is lying and 5 bottles of wine were removed from Jimi as Dr Bannister said…Jason once again trolls around giving an honest answer to the fact that once Siefert signed-off on the half hour written on the Hospital Report he confirmed Bannister’s resuscitation attempt…Jason further lies by ignoring that the Inquest data sheet was a second document that confirmed Jimi being treated when it listed “Unable To Resuscitate”…That wording clearly means they did treat Jimi with an attempted resuscitation, the half hour time of which was entered on the Hospital Report…Jason can play trolling word games all he wants but the facts are resoundingly with us and we don’t need to enter any silly trolling to prove it…
JASON says: The only liar here is this fraud who claims a “wine removal” and can’t produce any hospital documents to prove it. That is what you call a blowhard who can’t back up what he claims. 10 years and still nothin’.
Then he claims Siefert is lying so he can continue his hoax. This is all he can do cuz he has nothin’ and is a troll . It’s pathetic.
Siefert “signed off” on nothing since Siefert and Brown both refute this phony claim. And there is no documents of anything. Jimi had a “few minute” resuscitation attempt testified to by Dr Siefert and that was it. But this demented roll keeps on lying with his bogus claims he has no evidence for.
BUSTER says: Jason can’t answer how the nurses were methodically avoided in order to exclude their witnessing of the wine…Of course, being the servant of Satan that he is, he runs quickly towards the darkness this deliberate corruption offers…
JASON says: Buster with is Satan fetish again. This dude needs serious mental help LOL.
Buster, do you want the nurses to confirm Jimi died from a drug overdose like the official record states, like St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed, and like Dr. Bob Brown testified to? All which you nay say and ignore. All 3 refute you, you \wine troll.
BUSTER says: Look at Jason flagrantly side-step answering Dr Crompton’s statement that Jimi could not be breathing when he arrived at hospital because his lungs were full of fluid…
JASON says: LMAO. We know Jimi wasn’t breathing, dumbass. He was dead for 6 hours. Fluid is not fake wine like you push for your hoax.
BUSTER says: Jason’s caught here because he can’t attack Crompton and accuse him of being a fraud and liar.
JASON says: Says the troll who just called Dr Siefert a liar.
BUSTER says: Jason’s caught here because he can’t attack Crompton and accuse him of being a fraud and liar.
BUSTER says: That is proof that Siefert is lying
JASON says: What a liar and a troll who calls Siefert a liar. LOL.
BUSTER says: Jason’s caught here because he can’t attack Crompton and accuse him of being a fraud and liar like he attacks each and every other witness for the wine…So he flagrantly evades it and never gives any answer…Jason scoots out of that answer like the shameless troll he is without ever offering any answer why Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid or how they got that way from a borderline barbiturate dose that would not have killed him?…Or why Crompton even said that at all or where he got it from?…Nor does Jason offer a peep about how lungs full of wine totally destroys his trolling lie that Jimi only had dry vomit…Jason is clearly switching the subject to his 6 hours dead evasion in order to escape answering for the fluid…Jason would not be allowed to get away with that in a credibly moderated debate…What it really is is a concession of the point by Jason…
JASON says: What an idiot. I’ve already answered this. Dr. Teare in 1970, already documented in his report that Jimi had 400 ml of fluid in his chest. Teare stated Jimi’s lungs were only “congested”. This has been known since 9/29/70 and this so called “Hendrix expert” just discovered it now. LOL
What this stupid wine troll doesn’t understand is that the “fluid” runs his entire wine hoax.
The fluid inside Hendrix detected no wine. If there was a phony “wine drowning, the fluid would have detected wine.
And this hoaxer claims that Fraud Bannister drained Jimi dry from a “wine removal” 3 days earlier. No fluid should still be left inside Jimi Hendrix if he was sucked dry by Bannister…..oops….there goes our phony hoax….i’ve already refuted this with your fake “Flyswatter” account.
BUSTER says: Jason refuses to answer the point about Crompton’s fluid in the lungs proving there was wine in the lungs at the Samarkand…He tries to wiggle out of it by doubling down and saying there was no wine detected in the lung fluid analysis…But once again, if we follow Jason’s own demands, there is no documentation for any lung fluid analysis…That’s because there was no such analysis and Jason is showing us he doesn’t really take his own claims for documentation seriously…Jason uses these trolling strawmen to get around answering the basic point…Why was there any lungs full of fluid in the first place, and what was the fluid, and how did it get there?…You can see Jason using these bogus excuses to get out of answering evidence he knows he can’t answer…
JASON says: More projection from a troll. Documented forensic evidence and testimony is not “straw man”. The horseshit claims you come up with is straw man.
Sorry moron, when a body is being analyzed for an autopsy everything in the body is analyzed to determine the cause of death. This troll thinks the coroner and pathologist don’t analyze fluids in the body so they can determine what caused the death. Buster shows his pure ignorance once again. No wine was discovered either so your hoax is debunked yet again. I’ve answered this many times troll. Get some glasses or learn how to read. Either that or this is just another trolling ploy you use to attack the person who discredits you.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying when he says it would take hours to remove wine from a body…We know how long it would take because we have the recorded and witnessed 20 minutes for 5 bottles worth…That right there tells you the capacity and rate of the suction tube…
JASON says: Bullshit, and I’m not lying, you are. There is no documentation for this phony procedure and the tube is small which would take hours to manually drain wine from. Those tubes are not designed for powerful suctioning idiot. You have no real evidence and only the bullshit you concoct in your crazy head.
BUSTER says: I hope people realize that Jason is just an internet nut who found this comments section and in no way is he any credible or serious player in this business…Jason is scum from some degenerate dark corner of the internet and is only here because the room is unmoderated…As soon as Jason’s material was brought to a credibly moderated room he would quickly be banned…It is quite obvious Jason is playing trolling word games and focusing on semantics rather than offering serious debate…Any person of average intelligence can see he is avoiding the facts and obnoxiously pretending he is seriously challenging our case when it is plainly obvious he is just here for sick denial trolling…There’s a fine line between seeking the facts and seeking the excuses and we would quickly be spared Jason’s demented input as soon as this discussion were under the control of credibly accountable moderation…
JASON says: Blah, blah, blah, same old crap from a debunked wine troll. I’m never going to be banned so get over it.
People already know you are a troll who makes up bogus claims and lies for your hoax as you attack the posters who refute you. You’ve been doing this for 10 years and have been banned from every site you’ve been on.
You have zero evidence to produce as you troll along changing your fake stories.
I’ve posted all your lies and story changes again for all the readers to see this morning.
Why would it be necessary to cover up the death of a rock star? Jimi was apolitical with no connections or affiliations to any subversive groups. Protest movements of the 60’s were well established on their own and they did not need a rock star to spurn them on. Jimi appealed to a largely white audience however black people did go to his concerts and listen to his music. There was absolutely no need to target Jimi Hendrix and to murder him. Hoaxers want you believe that there was an orchestrated plot to kill Jimi and everyone involved was coerced into changing their story to make it look like an accidental death. This is coming from their beliefs and not from any known reliable source. They will seek out any information warranted or not that fuels their suspicions. An example of this is the focus on the red wine when it absolutely did not cause Jimi’s death; the toxic dose of the barbiturates did confirmed by Dr. Teare and then by Dr. Crompton during Kathy’s investigation. Instead the wine is given centre stage and repeated over and over with less attention given to the real cause of death. Hoaxers what you to believe that Jimi was murdered at all costs this is why they infiltrate threads to spread their suspicions and try to monopolise the conversation.
Still no answer to:
In chapter 11 of Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”, Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that Jimi’s lungs were filled with fluid when he arrived at the hospital. Where did Dr. Crompton get that information if it wasn’t documented somewhere?
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) claim?****
Jason knows what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, IS both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) knows it debunks their “no treatment was done” hoax.
And after all this time, still no answer to Dr. Bob Brown stating that Jimi “had a bit too much to drink”, and Jason still has no answer for “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink if there was ‘no wine’ as Jason keeps claiming?”. And it has already been proven that Dr. Brown wasn’t citing Jimi’s autopsy report, as Dr. Brown would know from reading that autopsy, that Dr. Teare’s statement of 100mg BAC was only an ESTIMATE and that Jimi’s real BAC was .005%. No doctor anywhere in the world is going to refer to a BAC of .005% as being “too much to drink”.
These germane points aren’t going away, you two assholes (Jason and Ivana) . They will be forever thrown up into your faces with the knowledge that you can’t answer them.
Same repeated nonsense from this troll who was already debunked. LOL
“JASON says:
November 20, 2019 at 7:51 pm
Same repeated nonsense from this troll who was already debunked. LOL”
TRANSLATED: Jason just proved my point that he can’t answer what was posted.
Read the past comments, moron. I’ve refuted everyone of them, but you keep posting the same nonsense over and over cuz you are a troll who uses fake names.
Ivana isn’t too swift…Anyone who reads her latest entry will see she now admits the red wine Jason has been trollishly denying up to now…You can see her conscience is starting to realize our facts about the wine are credible so she now admits it, only grudgingly so she can still continue her denial…
Ivana is totally ignorant about the COINTELPRO Program and their practices in the 1960’s…The government was seeking to destroy the rock anti-war movement because Hoover was paranoid and thought the Soviets were behind it…It doesn’t matter if Jimi was apolitical or not all one has to do is look at his FBI file to see he was being framed as being highly political and dangerous…Anyone who looks at Jimi’s FBI file will see his political danger being trumped-up for the purpose of justifying action against him…At the time, FBI was openly murdering Black Panthers like Freddie Hampton, so Ivana’s pretend questioning doesn’t stand up well against the more intelligent facts…Jimi’s FBI report had strong associations with The Black Panthers…
Ivana plays dumb and suggests that there is a “reliable source” out there that was going to report the truth on this…In the mean time better knowledged persons know that the government controls and censors those same mainstream media sources Ivana is referring to as “reliable sources”…In Ivana’s naive anti-conspiracy fairyland hospitals always report evidence for covert murder and mainstream media always seeks and reports the real truth in such cases…
The people who do political assassinations are not idiots…They are highly intelligent evil geniuses who are highly attuned to cultural influences and know the psychological effect of things in society…The practice psychological warfare in the military version of their practices and know the value of decapitation of leaders, intentional or not…
This reads well and truly like a hoax. The extent of Jimi’s anti war protest was the Star Spangled Banner at Woodstock and Machine Gun at the Fillmore. Jimi’s heart was never into fully identifying with any movement as these had their own powerful figureheads. I do not believe that Jimi was murdered and please don’t twist my words. You have a highly suspicious mindset that allows you to believe all this stuff. Jimi was never seen as a threat and was never targeted for assassination by any government group or program. Most of Jimi’s songs were not written to inspire some sort of uprising or mass protest against the government of the day. They were psychedelic in nature with lyrics that could never be interpreted as subversive. Bob Dylan, Joan Baez, Buffalo Springfield, Country Joe McDonald all had protest songs out there and I think these people survived into old age. Regardless of whether Jimi had a file he did not die at the hands of these agencies; the Vesparax caused his death. Stop making Jimi’s death a platform for your own twisted theories because in reality that is all they are.
And of course, we have this lying piece of pigshit named Ivana trying to sell us that Vesparax were the sole cause of Jimi’d death. Still doesn’t answer these documented facts that state otherwise;
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) claim?****
Jason knows what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, IS both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) knows it debunks their “no treatment was done” hoax.
Another phony conspiracy theory for a fake debunked hoax.
^^LOL — look at Jason, the lying, denying pig-breeder just keep wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality & talking to nobody but himself.
“JASON, the lying, denying pig-breeder just keep wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 20, 2019 at 4:17 pm
You provide the long blather with you “Buster” alter ego.
Same old nonsense from this wine troll.”
The same is suspected of Jason and his twin piglet Ivana & that they are one and the same person. Same old refuted nonsense posted by Jason that is refuted by the documented evidence that Jason/Ivana can’t answer.
“JASON, the lying, denying pig-breeder just keep wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 20, 2019 at 4:17 pm
Dr. Teare made public with the autopsy results in 1970 that Jimi Hendrix had 400ml fluid.
There was no wine detected in any of that fluid.”
Guess what, shit for brains named Jason/Ivana — the 400ml was never reported anywhere to be tested for ethanol content. It was never reported to be tested at all & Jason/Ivana’s response still doesn’t answer:
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) claim?****
“JASON, the lying, denying pig-breeder just keep wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 20, 2019 at 4:17 pm
You and Fraud Bannister claim Hendrix had “treatments” and was sucked dry, yet fluid still remained for Teare to discover that had no wine….oops!”
At no time, anywhere, did I ever state that Jim was sucked “bone dry” at the hospital. Just another self-decreed fabrication that Jason pulls out of his ass.
Jason just exhibits what a blatant liar that he is.
Anybody can go right to this link and read Bannister’s statements and see that Bannister never states any such thing either:
http://woodstockhendrix.gobot.com/about.html
“JASON, the lying, denying pig-breeder just keep wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 20, 2019 at 4:17 pm
Brown was citing Teare’s autopsy report as cit’s been told to you many times.”
And it has been told just as many times to this lying- denying pigbreeder named Jason that it has already been proven that Dr. Brown wasn’t citing Jimi’s autopsy report, as Dr. Brown would know from reading that autopsy, that Dr. Teare’s statement of 100mg BAC was only an ESTIMATE and that Jimi’s real BAC was .005%. No doctor anywhere in the world is going to refer to a BAC of .005% as being “too much to drink”.
Jason still can’t answer “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink if there was ‘no wine’ as Jason keeps claiming?” & just keeps wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality.
“JASON, the lying, denying pig-breeder just keep wallowing in his own pigshit mire of denial of reality says:
November 20, 2019 at 4:17 pm
This wine troll has nothin’ and can only repeat the same nonsense over and over.
You have no documented medial reports stating any treatments were performed and Siefert said nothing was done. Even Bannister said it was a formality.”
TRANSLATED: Jason has nothing but his own pigshit mire of denial of reality to wallow in & can’t refute this documented evidence:
What Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, IS both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) knows it debunks their “no treatment was done” hoax.
The Coroner’s Inquest form documents that a resuscitation attempt was made, but failed.
Another garbage commentary but no documents of wine.
Keep trying for the next 10 years..
Hi Jason. I hope we laugh Buster etc., off into oblivion. LOL.
Ivana is a moron…
She’s not answering what was said…
Anyone who reads Jimi’s FBI report will see the FBI considered him a serious threat…Jimi was on the FBI’s “Security Index” which is literally the government’s list of the worst threats to America…Despite this, this brain-less moron Ivana tells us the FBI did not consider Jimi a threat…
Look at Ivana downplay the seriousness of Jimi playing the ‘Star Spangled Banner’ in an irreverent way during the Viet Nam War…Even Dick Cavett commented it could be dangerous…There were “patriots” in the government at the time that saw that as seriously subversive…
Dumb…
Hi Ivana,
I laugh at this joker on the regular. I linked this site to a couple of my music forums and everybody is laughing at him too. Lol.
I looked at that site you posted, and that is indeed “Buster”, who posted under another alias. Same style garbage posts as he posts here. Not one person agreed with him. They were all laughing at him and this moron thought he won the “debate” LOL
Thanks for posting it. Had a good laugh and he changed his phony claims since then. That’s why this is all a hoax.
Did those people on your forums notice that you were a troll who openly evades the actual subject matter and emphasizes self-referenced ad hominem?…Like for instance you couldn’t address the actual subject matter of Jimi’s FBI file and how everything I said is dead accurate and Ivana is a trolling moron?…
BUSTER says: Did those people on your forums notice that you were a troll who openly evades the actual subject matter and emphasizes self-referenced ad hominem?…Like for instance you couldn’t address the actual subject matter of Jimi’s FBI file and how everything I said is dead accurate and Ivana is a trolling moron?
JASON says: Not at all. They watch me destroy your phony claims as you make a fool of yourself promoting a debunked hoax.
Being on an FBI list doesn’t make Jimi “murdered with wine” LOL.
All you do is troll the real documented evidence that refutes you as whine, cry, lie, claiming a “cover up”, Siefert is lying, and that I be banned.
Produce a wine report, you troll
You focus on the BAC instead of the 46mgs found in Jimi’s urine. This suggests that Jimi drank the wine at the parties he attended and not murdered with it. You have repeatedly set the scene for a waterboarding killing with the wine but now you are trying to shift the focus onto the resuscitation attempt which is a trivial matter when you think about it. Dr. Crompton is reiterating what the autopsy results revealed by Dr.Teare when speaking to Kathy. The resuscitation attempt you speak of consisted of a few short moments whereby Dr. Seifert pounded Jimi’s chest in order to establish time of death and not to revive him as this was impossible. It did not consist of a half hour of suctioning which produced five bottles of wine. As for the ethanol content the autopsy revealed no more than 5mgs in the blood. Despite Dr.Teare’s thorough examination of Jimi he still concluded that Jimi’s death was caused by inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. No where does he state that he suspected that it was anything other than that and Dr. Crompton reiterated this by mentioning to Kathy that Jimi had a toxic level of barbiturate in his system and that he could not have survived regardless of the presence of wine or no wine. These are the important facts of the matter and not the trivial points you are starting to focus on and drawing your attention to.
I think we could ask Dr Brown if he ever looked at Teare’s autopsy report for Jimi…I doubt he did…His memory was clearly from what he witnessed and he obviously detected the wine soaking Jimi just like Siefert (whose witnessing Jason contemptuously ignores)…
Jason is a proven liar because the context of the articles where Brown recounts his witnessing was clearly from his memory of walking along side Jimi as he was wheeled-in…Brown was very obviously not recounting looking at an autopsy report he had no access to…The clearly explained context of Brown’s statement was that he was remembering what he witnessed as he walked along side Jimi’s gurney as it was rolled in to St Mary’s…The context of Brown’s statement was that he clearly thought Jimi had too much to drink from what he saw when he walked along side the gurney…Obviously what he saw was the same wine Dr Siefert commented Jimi was covered in…Nice try Jason, but if you honestly appraise the evidence (instead of trolling and lying like you do) there’s no doubt Brown was referring to what he experienced as he saw Jimi wheeled-in…Since Jimi only had a 5mg blood alcohol content that means Brown could not have possibly been influenced to say Jimi had too much to drink from such an insignificant amount that he had no means of detecting…The only thing that could have caused that reaction was overt wine covering Jimi like Siefert said…Which means there was wine detected and therefore it had to have been detected at the Samarkand…Jason has badly failed to answer this in public…The articles make clear that Brown is not referencing the autopsy sheet in his memory…
This just shows what a pathetic, easily-detected liar Jason is…
Wine troll “Buster” still claiming the imaginary wine that Dr. Brown never spoke of. Brown told us Jimi Hendrix died from an overdose and “Buster” makes up more lies of wine in his crazy head with another fake story.
Buster told us Jimi was covered in vomit and he changes back to imaginary wine when it suits him. That is called trolling.
Teare’s report was known for decades and Dr. Brown was citing the official documented autopsy report. Brown sure as hell wasn’t talking about a fake conspiracy theory made up by some deranged wine troll that he doesn’t even knows exists.
Brown never spoke of wine anywhere since no documentation of wine exists.
Buster the clown should post some documented medical reports of the imaginary wine he claims “covered” and was “flooding” inside Jimi.
Reports would exist if it actually happened. But this wine troll can’t post it.
Let’s go Mr. Big Shot, post and prove your wine with real documents.
This joker is a big phony talker but can never deliver the goods of his imaginary wine.
That’s what a troll does. He’s been talking for 10 years and still has nothin’.
and he never will.
You’re lying Jason and anyone who reads this can see you are clearly evading the point…Any reading of the articles in which Bob Brown gave that story shows that Brown was talking about what he saw when he walked along side Jimi’s gurney as it was wheeled-in to hospital…You have been caught flagrantly lying here because I am correct and anyone who bothers to go read all the articles where Brown said that can see right away that he said openly that he was recounting what he witnessed when he walked along side the gurney…He was not recounting what he learned from the autopsy report so you are caught lying and you also still haven’t answered the question of what made Bob Brown think Jimi had too much to drink?…The obvious answer is Brown detected the same wine that was covering Jimi as Siefert…Don’t lie…You know this is true because you can’t answer it in public without flagrantly lying…If you read the exact words of Brown he says when I walked along side Jimi as he was wheeled-in and looked at him it was obvious he had too much to drink…
You see Brown did not have a long career as a doctor…Like Bannister he was Australian and went back to Australia where he became a politician…Jason is lying here because Brown never accessed the autopsy report while he was in London…Like Bannister, Brown went back to Australia after a year and never saw the autopsy report that was at the London Coroner’s Office…The autopsy was not a public issue until 1992 so Jason is caught lying because Brown did not access it then either…What the sick troll Jason is trying to get away with here is we could speak to Brown and ask him if he was referring to the autopsy report when he was referencing Jimi obviously having too much to drink?…Even better we could ask Brown if he ever told that same story to anyone before 1992?…You can bet he did and you can bet it included mention of too much to drink…So Jason once again shows no respect for the readers and treats them as if they were stupid…The evidence here is showing that Brown was clearly referencing his memory from that morning and not talking about the autopsy report…Jason knows this is true which is why he tries to lie around it so transparently, trollishly, and stupidly while publicly evading the point…
Jason probably has regular sycophantic members at his music forums that agree with any bullshit he posts in order to keep in favor…Of course he references them as agreeing with his lies…All that is is Jason bullshitting over the top of the facts he can’t answer like he does here…Jason is a lying loser and hypocrite because you can bet he bans members who disagree with his crazy lies…
Hi Jason. I thought too much to drink meant that you ingested the wine and was brought in drunk into casualty. What it doesn’t mean is that you were covered externally with it. I love the way Buster etc intentionally focuses on the wine to deliberately draw your attention to it and to take the focus away from the Vesparax which really caused Jimi’s death. I don’t think he has any real interest or concern for Jimi as a person or musician. All this habitual poster wants to prove it that Jimi died in a gruesome way from waterboarding with wine. This fake hides behind various pseudonyms and posts on any site where he tries to manipulate and monopolise the content so he can push his phoney murder theory. Only the gullible would fall for what he says with the more intelligent threads laughing him off and ridiculing his claims.
How exactly was Jimi a top security threat to the FBI and where exactly did you get this nonsense information from. Dick Cavett made an off the cuff remark with no intended malice or warning behind it. Jimi played this at Woodstock to heighten the realities and horrors of war in general but particularly Viet Nam as this was relevant at the time. As Jimi said during the interview that he was an American so he played it and he thought it was beautiful when Dick Cavett thought it was an unorthodox way to interpret the American national anthem. This piece was meant to reflect America ‘s involvement in the war and was not meant to be viewed as subversive.It was a brilliant piece played by a brilliant musician. Fortunately I never take want you write seriously Buster as you come across as someone with a skewed sense of reality and mindset. You always see the worst in a situation reading far too much into it and it’s always bad and far fetched. You live through others lives devoting ten years to a fruitless pursuit. Now that is moronic.
(Hello again folks! People all agree (except for a very small percentage of morons) that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose like the official record states. That in fact is always shown each time I refute a certain wine troll named “Buster” the clown or whatever alias he decides to post with. We enter into Volume IV refuting the bogus claims of this wine clown who will post anything so he can win a “debate”. Yes it is fraudulent, but this troll has managed to change his entire phony theory as he changes phony claims from post to post. He comes up with more absurd claims that I will knock down easily once again. Phony claims will always be easily debunked with real forensics and documented evidence and “Buster” the clown has none. And here we go with Volume IV.)
“The Three Main Points That Always Destroys The Phony Wine Claims And The Hendrix Murder Hoax”
Point Number One, Volume IV
By Jason
We all know that when a person goes to the hospital every single thing is recorded in a file about that person. Doctors and nurses don’t go on guess work and claims. They document everything so they know what was done for the patient. When a person is certified to be dead on arrival like Jimi Hendrix was, even more importance is placed to document everything about that person so not a thing is missed.
Our wine troll “Buster” expects us to believe that all the doctors had no idea that Jimi Hendrix was a dead decomposing corpse when he was certified dead on arrival. I guess the black rotting mouth and no pulse would be not noticed by trained doctors who went to medical school. They would have to wait until over 20 years later to hear it from Dr. Crompton, who was never there, and just read the old report to let them all know Hendrix was dead for hours. What a joke and “Buster” should be ashamed to even post this crap.
See, this is the crap this wine troll peddles when he is debunked. Just a total fraud who should be treated like a clown for violating evidence like he does. Just absurd nonsense that is laughable and not how real life works.
“Buster” expects us to believe all these phony “procedures” were performed on Hendrix but the doctors didn’t bother to document anything they did. Sorry, that’s not how a hospital operates. Only in make believe hoax land can this happen, which is why nobody believes this nonsense except for a few loons who have no common sense. If you told the average person this stuff, they would think you should belong in a nut house.
No documentation of a “wine removal” ever exists for Jimi Hendrix on his St. Mary Abbots Hospital record. No imaginary wine measurements from Fraud Bannister were ever passed on to Dr.Teare for the autopsy. None of this “wine” that this troll claims Jimi was “covered in” was ever documented on his record. Fraud Bannister claimed “wine” on Hendrix was extraordinary and something he never saw before. Yet, he never documented it and passed it on to Teare to investigate for the autopsy. That’s how we know this is all a hoax. If all that imaginary wine was covering Jimi, and he has all this wine flooding his body, you can bet your ass that it would all have been recorded, documented, and told to the press on 9/18/70. But what did St. Mary Abbots Hospital say what was the cause of Hendrix’s death? Yeah, that’s right, a drug overdose. Not one damn word about wine or in the autopsy report. Not one medical file about wine either. But this wine troll rants like a loon and still cries that wine was there. Yes, but only in his crazy head, but not in 1970 cuz nothing exists about wine during Jimi’s death.
We don’t go on phony claims. We operate on real documented evidence and “Buster the clown” has none which is why he can only blow hot air, rant like a loon, attack my character, and cry that I get banned for exposing his wine hoax. If “Buster” had any credibility at all, he would easily be able to post real documented evidence like I do all the time. He is unable to since he only has phony claims. For 10 years he posted the same nonsense and still hasn’t proven anything except he managed to debunk his own hoax for us. Now that is hilarious!
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he
was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Dr. Siefert gave his honest testimony regarding his actions and what he did for Jimi Hendrix on 9/18/70 which was only a formality resuscitation attempt. “Buster” the clown makes up a terrible and fraudulent lie claiming that Siefert was taking part in a “cover up” cuz Siefert’s testimony debunks “Buster’s” fraudulent claim. Now “Buster” has no proof of this absurd claim, but he types it anyway, cuz he is a hoaxer pushing his debunked scam.
“Buster the clown” throws out any crap he can hoping it will stick. This fake Siefert “cover up” claim is a perfect example of that. Since, “Buster the clown” is making a serious charge against Siefert claiming a “cover up”, we all ask “Buster” to post some real documented evidence of this “cover up” he is fraudulently claiming. He can’t do it cuz he is just a fraud making another bogus claim like all his others. So, in return he will just blow more hot air without any action. The dude is just a fake talker and never delivers the goods. That’s why he is laughed at everywhere he posts his conspiracy garbage. For 10 years this joker still can never prove the nonsense he spouts off with any documentation.
Dr. Siefert taking part in a “cover up” is absurd, since there is nothing for him to “cover up”. Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose like all the forensic evidence has shown and which is etched in stone as the offical death of Jimi Hendrix.
So this wine troll “Buster”, claims Dr. Siefert is “covering up” but Fraud Bannister is telling phony tales of wine. So, would “Buster” the clown now claim Fraud Bannister went rogue from this fake “grand cover up” that “Buster” claims?
It’s a total joke when this guy makes absurd claims like this when his phony theory goes up in smoke. If there was this big “cover up”, then Fraud Bannister certainly wouldn’t be making up his phony public imaginary wine claims that never existed.
So, it’s easy for “Buster the clown” to hide from evidence that refutes him, he just claims a “cover up”, so he doesn’t have to answer for the evidence that refutes him. That is both cowardly and pathetic. It’s also fraudulent accusing a man of a fake “cover up” and distorting the offical record. But that is the game that Buster the clown plays.
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he
was dead.”- Dr. Martin Siefert
Dr. Siefert clearly tells us that nothing more could be done for Jimi Hendrix cuz he was already dead. And this is how it works in real life folks. When someone is hooked up to a monitor and it’s flat that person is dead and the resuscitation attempt ends. And that’s what happened to Jimi Hendrix as well.
Another bogus claim made up by the wine hoaxer “Buster/Flyswatter” is that the doctors had no idea that Jimi was dead for 6 hours and only learned about it from Crompton decades later. Can you believe this nonsense this joker is making up? This clown just made this up cuz I debunked his hoax of doctors performing phony “procedures” on a dead 6 hour Jimi Hendrix corpse. “Buster” had nothing for rebuttal so he made up this garbage which debunks his own theory.
First of all, doctors go to medical school to determine the estimation of how long a person has been dead. All the doctors viewed Jimi’s dead body on 9/18/70 and determimed him to be dead for hours. It was confirmed and documented in Jimi’s medical records which is why Crompton was able to read it decades later.
Second, this is the reason why nothing would be done for Jimi Hendrix cuz he was already dead for hours and no hospital would allow doctors to perform weird medical procedures on a dead corpse. Jimi was certified to be dead on arrival. This is documented in his official report and was reported by his public relations manager Les Perrin and the entire media reported it. Dead on arrival means you are legally declared dead when you reach the hospital. No procedures are performed on legally declared dead people. Call up any hospital and ask them what they do for dead on arrivals. They will explicitly tell you ‘nothing’. And that’s what was done for Jimi Hendrix. So for “Buster the clown” to absurdly claim that the doctors had no idea Jimi was already dead for hours is a total joke, since he was already dead and decomposing which was visible to all the doctors.
Third, Dr. Crompton was never there in 1970 to examine Jimi Hendrix. He was reading the report of the autopsy that was perfomed by Dr. Teare and what the doctors stated about Hendrix’s decomposing condition when he reached the hospital. So, the absurd claim that the doctors had no idea that Jimi was dead for 6 hours until Dr. Crompton told them is laugh out loud hilarious. Just another bogus claim from “Buster” the wine troll.
Fourth, “Buster” the clown said I made a false statement when I post Jimi was dead for 6 hours. Well, “Buster” agreed with Dr. Crompton’s assessment that Jimi died no later than 5:30am. The ambulance men got Jimi to the hospital at 11:45 so that is 6 hours later. So, in “Buster” the clown’s fraudulent attempt to change his phony stories, he managed to debunk his own timeline and Crompton as well. We can all laugh again at this wine troll.
Here in Volume IV more of these absurd new phony claims by “Buster the clown” was easily debunked and we all could see his fraudulent attempt to continue his destroyed hoax. Buster the clown is in a life struggle to promote his fake hoax with zero evidence he can ever produce and it’s been going on now for 10 years. That is hilarious. Real documented testimony, evidence, and forensic science will always stand up to defeat these phony absurd claims that are just made up inside a deranged head of a wine troll desperately trying to win a “debate” when this is about the real evidence that he will ever have. Keep whining troll.
The only one whining is the little pink cupcake, Jason because he can’t answer:
In chapter 11 of Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”, Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that Jimi’s lungs were filled with fluid when he arrived at the hospital. Where did Dr. Crompton get that information if it wasn’t documented somewhere?
****How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) claim?****
Jason knows what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, IS both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) knows it debunks their “no treatment was done” hoax.
And after all this time, still no answer to Dr. Bob Brown stating that Jimi “had a bit too much to drink”, and Jason still has no answer for “what would make Dr. Brown think that Jimi had anything to drink if there was ‘no wine’ as Jason keeps claiming?”. And it has already been proven that Dr. Brown wasn’t citing Jimi’s autopsy report, as Dr. Brown would know from reading that autopsy, that Dr. Teare’s statement of 100mg BAC was only an ESTIMATE and that Jimi’s real BAC was .005%. No doctor anywhere in the world is going to refer to a BAC of .005% as being “too much to drink”.
Jason will try & lie and say that he has “debunked” this, but anyone can easily see that he hasn’t. He simply can’t answer it so Jason has to lie to try and get around it.
“JASON says:
November 21, 2019 at 3:24 am
Dr. Crompton was never there in 1970 to examine Jimi Hendrix. He was reading the report of the autopsy that was perfomed by Dr. Teare and what the doctors stated about Hendrix’s decomposing condition when he reached the hospital. So, the absurd claim that the doctors had no idea that Jimi was dead for 6 hours until Dr. Crompton told them is laugh out loud hilarious. Just another bogus claim from “Buster” the wine troll.
Fourth, “Buster” the clown said I made a false statement when I post Jimi was dead for 6 hours. Well, “Buster” agreed with Dr. Crompton’s assessment that Jimi died no later than 5:30am. The ambulance men got Jimi to the hospital at 11:45 so that is 6 hours later.”
Another example of Jason lying & ripping things out of context and idiotically suggesting the doctors at St. Mary Abbots knew that Jimi had been dead for 6 hours when Jimi arrived at the hospital. There is no possible way they could know that.
Dr. Crompton had the knowledge that Jimi had eaten a rice meal before 3AM when he made his assessment that Jimi died no later than 5:30PM. This info can be read here:
https://www.rockprophecy.com/whytake5hrs.html
How would the doctors at St. Mary Abbots, on Sept, 18, 1970, know that Jimi had eaten a rice meal before 3AM? The autopsy was done 3 days later and it was Dr. Teare that found the undigested grains of rice in Jimi’s stomach.
Jason makes himself look stupid once again, and talks this dumb shit about the doctors at St. Mary Abbots knowing that Jimi was dead for 6 hours, just because Jason is desperately trying to peddle his “no treatment was done” hoax, which Jason knows has been debunked by the documented evidence of what Crompton told Kathy about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid upon his arrival to the hospital, in combination with the autopsy finding 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs 3 days later.
When Jason speaks of “laugh out loud hilarious”, he speaks only of his own long-winded blather.
Hi Jason. I’ve been reading excerpts from “Drugs As Weapons Against Us. The CIA’s Murderous Targeting” by John L Potash. I think most of this misguided reasoning and information is coming from this unreliable source. Reads like a giant conspiracy theory. I just don’t get Flysquatter’s reasoning; what is he trying to get at exactly when he says Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid. The autopsy revealed 400ml of free fluid in one lung and some in the other, that’s it. This does not imply that Jimi received extensive treatment in casualty like these two buffoons are trying to suggest or that he arrived at the hospital lungs overflowing with fluid. Nothing will change the overriding conclusion that Jimi didn’t die from drinking too much wine or being waterboarded to death with it.
“IVANA says:
November 21, 2019 at 9:28 pm
I just don’t get Flysquatter’s reasoning; what is he trying to get at exactly when he says Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid. The autopsy revealed 400ml of free fluid in one lung and some in the other, that’s it.”
***In chapter 11 of Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”, Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that Jimi’s lungs were filled with fluid when he arrived at the hospital. Where did Dr. Crompton get that information if it wasn’t documented somewhere?
How did Jimi’s lungs go from being filled with fluid upon Jimi’s arrival to St. Mary Abbots on Sept. 18th, to having 400ml in one of the lungs at the autopsy on Sept. 21st, if there was “no treatment done”, as these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) claim?
Jason knows what Dr. Crompton told Kathy in 1991 about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital on Sept. 18, in combination with the autopsy that was done 3 days later on Sept. 21 & reporting 400ml of free fluid in one of the lungs, IS both documented medical and physical evidence that proves that a resuscitation attempt was made & these two assholes (Jason and Ivana ) knows it debunks their “no treatment was done” hoax.****
Very self explanatory, now isn’t it? Dr. Crompton told Kathy about Jimi’s lungs being filled with fluid when Jimi arrived at the hospital. Anyone who has any reading skills has no problem “getting it”.
If anybody like Ivana claims that they don’t “get it”, it’s because they are being blatantly illiterate. Of course, we already knew that about Ivana, anyways.
I’m a very educated person that’s why I don’t understand anything you say. Totally ridiculous reasoning as always. How could you possibly believe that a long dead corpse had any work done in casualty when that was the duty of Dr.Teare to establish cause of death. You need to use your grey matter more selectively in future and not fall for just the information that appeals to you. Jason and I can spot a lie from miles away that’s why we have refuted most of the nonsense that is on offer here.
“IVANA says:
November 21, 2019 at 10:22 pm
I’m a very educated person that’s why I don’t understand anything you say.”
Educated in what? Must be self-proctology, seeing as how you continually pull your fabrications out of your ass & continually talk out your anal sphincter, just like Scott Thompson already called you out for doing.
Jason knows he’s lying and that our facts are true because he wouldn’t spend so much effort at trolling it unless he knew he had to get around facts he couldn’t answer…I mean if you copied what Jason posts and showed it to the public most people would think he was a trolling asshole just from his style…Serious participants in this subject do not post that way or obviously protest too much like Jason does…
Jason was asked to show the documentation he demands for Jimi overdosing and Jimi bring Dead On Arrival…He can’t come up with either because he knows neither of those things happened and he is just trolling it without proof…As usual he tries to compensate for it with obnoxious taunting and name-calling but the bottom line is Jason can’t come up with the facts he demands of others for those two lying claims…Very simply, and without any obnoxious trolling, the reason there was no Dead On Arrival document is because they tried to resuscitate Jimi for the half hour that is written on the Hospital Report…That’s why Jason comes up empty on his lie that Jimi was dead on arrival that he is using to deny the resuscitation attempt…The reason St Mary’s did not write “Dead On Arrival” on any document is because the resuscitation attempt procedurally pre-empts and nullifies it…Thanks for sharpening our case Jason…
Jason thinks people are stupid and has no respect for them…Siefert worked right along side Bannister for that listed half hour because he had to because he was in charge and responsible as head registrar…He couldn’t leave because Jimi was his patient…No one, including Jason, has any documentation to show Siefert went anywhere else after that supposed few minutes he lied about…That’s because Siefert didn’t go anywhere and was right there removing the wine with Bannister as Bannister said…Those pesky nurses Jason never gives any honest answer to would have confirmed this…Jason hopes his obnoxious trolling will distract you from realizing he never gives any honest answer to that…
Jason is just repeatedly trying to force the same lie through over and over but it is an inferior argument that he loses every time he makes it…That’s why we’ve already won this debate because Jason is obnoxiously violating the rules of evidence…Our evidence is better and Jason is trollishly trying to overcome it by entering bogus regressive claims that don’t serve to credibly answer what we’re showing…Jason is deliberately making a false argument above because he knows he can’t answer our arguments…He’s avoiding the point that the real question here is “Did hospitals treat a patient in Jimi’s condition when they arrived at hospital?”…And the answer is yes, they did, as Bannister made clear when he said “We did what we would have done with any patient in those circumstances”…That’s the truth but Jason doesn’t like it so he tries to troll around it with mis-quotes and the backing of Siefert’s obvious lie…Jason is stupid because his obvious trolling is simply answered by saying doctors use their energy to try to save first before wasting time on determining how long someone might have been dead…This is not only correct but it is the superior argument…Jason is nuts if he thinks he’s getting away with his trolling bullshit in response to this…In any case, this is all decided by the half hour written on the Hospital Report that Jason is obviously in trolling contempt of…No serious person believes there is no Hospital Report that clearly lists a half hour for the treatment time…
Jason uses trolling sleight of hand to get around what we’ve shown…Instead of admitting he can’t answer our evidence Jason constructs a straw man where he pretends he is honestly interested in the evidence by demanding documentation…The reason he does that is because he is trying to divert the readers’ attention from the fact he has badly failed to answer the evidence we did show…By raising the bar through straw man trolling Jason then switches the onus to us, even though any honest objective evaluation of what has already been discussed shows he is badly failing to answer the facts and is only raising that bar in order to avoid admitting it…
The reason for Jason’s latest trolling filibuster and repeating of already-refuted claims (while trollishly saying he has refuted us) is because he’s trying to divert the readers’ from the fact he hasn’t given any answer to Crompton’s statement that Jimi had lungs full of fluid when he arrived at St Mary’s…Crompton was England’s number one pathologist at the time and was not a person who would use words recklessly or without any ability to back them up with evidence…He obviously had some reason to say Jimi’s lungs were full of the same fluid Bannister witnessed…The reason Jason enters the aggressive trolling above is because he’s caught by Crompton’s statement of Jimi’s lungs being full of fluid…Look at all his bullshit and you’ll see he’s never given any credible answer to it…Crompton was an experienced professional and he knew that if the autopsy sheet said Jimi had 400ml of fluid in one lung and none in the other that the statement “Jimi’s lung(S) were full of fluid” would automatically forensically connote a resuscitation removal of that fluid…So there we have Bannister’s witnessing confirmed and we have circumstantial proof of Bannister’s claimed 20 minute removal time because that is what it would take the hospital suction device to remove that amount of wine…Jason thinks people are stupid and they don’t see him not able to answer this documented proof…However anyone can see that his phony demand for documentation is just his dishonest way of getting around his painfully apparent dodging of the evidence he calls for but then runs from when shown…We’ve shown enough and Jason can’t answer it…The documentation is on the Hospital Report that lists a half hour for the removal of the fluid Dr Crompton confirmed…And the proof is in the statement by England’s top pathologist that Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…The reason Jason avoids answering this is because he knows it is proof and he knows it refutes his denial of Jimi being drowned in wine…
Buster……
The Inquest form also never states “Dead on Arrival”. Instead, it states “Unable to Resuscitate”.
What was that BS that Jason was trying to claim about “no documentation”? The BS is clearly located squarely between Jason’s ears.
More hot air from this wine troll “Buster”. Gives a long boring commentary but can never produce any documentation of the wine he claims for his hoax.
Jimi has been confirmed dead on arrival by the media, the doctors, and his public relations manager. This is already documented evidence.
You have no evidence for your wine you claim.
Let me remind you that Jimi Hendrix forever and will always be confirmed to have died from inhalation of vomit due to a drug overdose. No wine was ever documented.
It is up to you to produce documents to overturn the official result and you’ve failed to do so and you never will be able to.
All your fake evidence and stories you make up has landed you with a soft turd.
Dr. Crompton studied and succeeded Dr. Teare at the Department of Forensic Medicine at St. George’s Hospital Medical School. When he read Dr Teare’s autopsy he reiterated that Jimi had a toxic level of barbiturate in his system. Jimi had 400ml of free fluid in the left chest and some in the right at the time of the autopsy. The left lung was partially collapsed with vomited material extracted from the smaller bronchi. The fluid Dr. Crompton was referring to was what was witnessed by Dr. Teare during the autopsy since it is illegal for any doctor to tamper with a dead body before an autopsy is performed as this would remove vital evidence of cause of death. No hospital report was handed to Dr. Teare stating that Jimi had fluid removed in casualty if it had then the autopsy report would have come to a different conclusion as to the cause of death. Dr. Crompton confirmed that Jimi could not have survived due to the toxicity of the barbiturate in his liver. The fluid in Jimi’s lungs was irrelevant to the actual cause of death as Jimi died of inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. Jimi took a high dose of the Vesparax and these contributed to his death. Dr. Crompton confirmed Dr. Teare’s autopsy findings and no where did he state that he come to a different conclusion regarding Jimi’s death.
Since both Jason and Ivana can’t stomach the truth & can’t handle losing an honest argument, I offer a solution for both of these two whiny little pink cupcakes. That solution is:
These two whiny little pink cupcakes (Jason and Ivana) need to load up a revolver with 6 rounds and play Russian Roulette <— that way they will win every time.
I’m appalled by this comment. You live in a country with a high level of gun violence yet that is exactly what you are advising Jason and I to do and you have repeatedly stated that Jimi Hendrix died violently. I always thought you were a nutter by your over the top comments now I am totally convinced. Jason and I love nothing more than a good argument but we sure haven’t been getting it from either of you two. You wouldn’t know how to recognise the truth even if it came up to you and introduced itself. In your case Russian Roulette would be better played solitaire.
“IVANA says:
November 21, 2019 at 7:30 pm
I’m appalled by this comment.”
My apologies — I didn’t word it correctly. I should have said two whiny little lying PIG pink cupcakes (Jason and Ivana).
There, is that better?
And regarding your statement of “You wouldn’t know how to recognize the truth even if it came up to you and introduced itself” <— great description of Jason and yourself, there. But, you didn't have to tell us that — we already knew that about you.
I love nothing more than eating pig pink cup cakes in the morning while drinking espresso coffee. If I can find some with the name Flyswatter/Alfie on then I’ll send you some priority mail.
Pathetic how this troll has to make up new accounts with fake names to attack me and Ivana with.
That’s how you know a troll has easily lost when he has to stoop to this level to give himself fake credibility.
Fake credibility with fake a wine hoax go hand in hand.
This troll got caught…..LOL
Hilarious indeed.
Since both Jason and Ivana can’t stomach the truth & can’t handle losing an honest argument, I offer a solution for both of these two whiny little pink cupcakes. That solution is:
These two whiny little pink cupcakes (Jason and Ivana) need to load up a revolver with 6 rounds and play Russian Roulette <— that way they will win every time.
Sorry — first post didn’t go though for whatever reason. AlfieNeumann and I are one & the same person. Buster is NOT one and the same, contrary to what these wo whiny little pink cupcakes (Jason and Ivana) try to claim.
You know a troll has lost badly when he has to make up more fake names to attack you with. You are pathetic “Buster”. How many fake names do you use? What a clown. This is the reason this troll was banned from every site and forum he posts on for trolling and hoaxing. Pathetic indeed with disgraceful comments.
Jason knows we are different people Flyswatter…He’s provoking you in order to further destroy this thread, which is obviously his real purpose…I wouldn’t feed his trolling…
Hi Jason. I didn’t realise you were trying to destroy this thread. Aren’t we just two whiny little pink cupcakes. LOL.
BUSTER says: Jason knows we are different people Flyswatter…He’s provoking you in order to further destroy this thread, which is obviously his real purpose…I wouldn’t feed his trolling…
JASON says: You are a pathological liar “Buster”. You were banned from sites for using multiple alias accounts trying to give yourself fake credibility.and to attack posters. You are doing it here again on this site as well, with your newly fake “alfienueman” name to attack me and Ivana. That is totally cowardly and pathetic, but you got caught red handed.
Even the posters at gearpage.net, that you trolled, said that your Scrum Drum and Flyswatter account is the same person.
From gearpage.net site:
“new members Flyswatter and Scrum Drum are either the same person (which is against TGP rules, by the way) or both are acquainted via some Hendrix “truther” website, found this thread by a google search and revived it.”
JASON says: “Buster”, you are a long time internet troll who floods websites with your fake “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax”. Your trolling footprints are all over the websites pushing your scam. That’s why you get banned from all those sites.
Well folks, we have a blast from the past for Flashback Friday as we look at “Buster’s” past lies, trolling, contradictions, phony claims, story changes, and his pure ignorance. This determines that “Buster” aka Brian Doyle Is a hoaxer who was banned from many sites and forums for trolling.
BUSTER says: Jeffery certainly ran Hendrix in a counterintelligence way. Whether that was officially done or not has yet to be shown. Jeffery was a British Intelligence MI6 operative during his national service.
JASON says: This joker ends up contradicting his phony claims which is good for a laugh. First he claims Jeffery ran Jimi in a “counterintelligence way”, but then he contradicts that phony claim by saying it hasn’t yet been shown, and then he goes back to claiming Jeffery being in intelligence. This troll has no idea what he’s talking about and he just throws out any old crap to muddy the waters for his hoax. He takes part in disinformation and uses whatever garbage he can to claim a fake “Hendrix Murder”. That’s why “Buster” the man of many pseudonyms has been banned from many places for trolling. Perfect example here of that.
BUSTER says: The lungs were probably filled with wine because the wine bottles were shoved down his windpipe.
JASON says: So, this troll isn’t even sure of this phony claim as he says “probably”. Probably is always a dead giveaway of a phony claim, and that’s what this is.
Notice, how he says “bottles of wine were shoved down his windpipe” when he was telling us recently that “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”. So, this troll changes his fake claims when it suits him. That is called trolling.
BUSTER says: Hendrix had bottles of wine shoved down his throat by unknown assailants.
JASON says: Now “Buster” aka Doyle the troll is claiming “wine was shoved down Jimi’s throat by “unknown assailants” when before he said it was Jeffery. A troll always changes fake claims and that’s why he is pushing a hoax.
BUSTER says: The lungs were probably filled with wine because the wine bottles were shoved down his windpipe.
BUSTER says: Hendrix had bottles of wine shoved down his throat by unknown assailants.
BUSTER says: August 22, 2019
Also, Jason’s claims of Jimi showing signs of forced trauma is ignorant of the fact the autopsy discovered a .7mg barbiturate blood level…That is a level that would cause unconsciousness, which means no one would need to force wine in to Jimi.
JASON says: Well here we see this troll changing his fake stories. He tells us twice Jimi had wine forced into him and then he tells us “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”. This wine troll changes his fake stories so he can claim he won a “debate” but with his trolling he ends up debunking his phony claims. That is hilarious!
So Buster, was wine “forced” or “not forced” into Jimi? Which is it? You can’t have it both ways.
BUSTER says: No, actually I stated that the circumstantial evidence of a large amount of wine as witnessed by the constable called to the scene by the ambulance attendants corroborated this.
JASON says: Here is another fraudulent lie by Doyle the troll aka “Buster” the clown. We all know that no wine was ever witnessed at the flat by ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones since they never testified to it. Also, Officer Ian Smith never witnessed any imaginary wine either. So, this wine troll makes up fraudulent lies of wine by adding his own fake scenarios by distorting the real event. No wine was ever witnessed at the flat but this fraud lies telling people wine was witnessed. This is blatant lying and trolling. Which is why Brian Doyle aka Buster was banned from many sites and forums.
BUSTER says: The ambulance attendants also witnessed a large amount of wine on and around Hendrix. So Bannister’s account is backed by witnesses who witnessed the wine innocently and on their own. Your side has ignored this several times. The wine seen spilled around Hendrix, plus the wine Bannister noted, adds up to a large amount of wine, and the splashed wine possibly conforms to wine splattered around in the act of murder.
JASON says: Well, this is a crock of shit since this was never witnessed by anyone. John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed “a large amount of wine on and around Hendrix”. Both men only testified to witnessing brown vomit.
Notice how he says “probably” again. Another dead giveaway that he’s just making up more crap in his crazy head. No wine was “splashed around” anywhere and no wine was witnessed at the flat. Not one ambulance man or police officer said there was a “murder scene” or witnessed one. Bannister’s phony account was never backed by any witnesses at the flat. The witnesses discredit Fraud Bannister by only witnessing vomit. Just more blatant lies from a wine troll who makes up his own fake claims trying to dismantle the real events that happened for his bogus wine hoax.
BUSTER says: Dr Bannister specified that he removed a plug of vomit from Hendrix’s windpipe and the wine then gushed out.
JASON says: Here we go, the fake “hard plug of vomit” that never existed. Wine can’t “gush out” from a windpipe since a windpipe doesn’t gush. Didn’t this wine troll just tell us that Siefert removed the fake “hard plug of vomit” and Bannister didn’t? Why yes this troll did.
BUSTER says: Dr Bannister specified that he removed a plug of vomit from Hendrix’s windpipe and the wine then gushed out.
JASON says: Here we go, the fake “hard plug of vomit” that never existed. Wine can’t “gush out” from a windpipe since a windpipe doesn’t gush. Didn’t this wine troll just tell us that Siefert removed the fake “hard plug of vomit” and Bannister didn’t? Why yes this troll did.
BUSTER says: Dr Bannister specified that he removed a plug of vomit from Hendrix’s windpipe and the wine then gushed out.
BUSTER says: Bannister never saw the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat because Siefert and the nurses removed it before he got to the scene…
JASON says: This troll certainly did. Buster aka Brian Doyle changed his fake story to Siefert doing a fake “procedure” that Siefert never testified to. Siefert said nothing was done for Hendrix but this lying troll makes up a new fake story changing his original fake story. This is how we know Buster is a hoaxer trolling making up fake claims whenever he wants. That is called trolling.
First Buster the troll says, Bannister removed the fake “hard plug of vomit” and now he claims Siefert removed it and Fraud Bannister wasn’t there. What a lying turd this troll is.
So Buster, who removed the fake “hard plug of vomit”? Was it Fraud Bannister like you first said or is it now Siefert as you changed it to? Which is it? You can’t have it both ways.
BUSTER says: The blood alcohol level was too low to correspond to normal ingestion of wine.
JASON says: Here’s another fraudulent lie from this troll cuz Dr. Teare documented in his autopsy through analysis that Jimi Hendrix’s blood alcohol level was 100 mg per 100 ml which was high enough to fail a breathalyzer test. Jimi was above the legal limit from the wine he drank at Kameron’s party and earlier at Harvey’s. So his ingestion of wine was slightly above the legal alcohol limit. And this troll lies to push his bogus hoax. Dr. Teare analyzed and documented all this and it’s it the record books. We can expect this troll to claim Teare forged the numbers so this troll “Buster” can still push his debunked hoax cuz he is deranged wanting Jimi to be “murdered” with no evidence. That’s what we are dealing with here….a nut.
BUSTER says: The main witness Danneman’s stories were proven bogus.
JASON says: And yet you still use Dannemann’s bogus stories when it suits your fake hoax that you push cuz you are a troll.
Buster aka Brian Doyle’s fake stories were all proven bogus as he makes up blatant lies distorting testimony, making up his own fake evidence, contradicting his phony claims, and deliberately changing fake stories when it suits his needs. This is called blatant trolling which is why he is banned from every site he infiltrates with his bogus debunked conspiracy crap. This is what he lives for, lying, trolling, and pushing a debunked hoax. It’s a total joke as we can laugh at this joker but it’s also disgraceful how he attempts to disgrace the legacy of Jimi Hendrix on terrible outright lies mostly made up by a lunatic.
Jason is trying to switch the subject and divert from the previous material where he was thoroughly refuted…He wants us to chase him down his trolling rabbit holes where he can continue to draw us in to his trolling in order to post more nay-saying denials…Jason isn’t a serious or credible character…He’s just an internet crazy who thinks it is a fun game to troll Jimi’s murder…
We won this debate long ago when Jason could not publicly answer Dr Crompton’s statement to Kathy Etchingham that Jimi could not have been breathing when he arrived at hospital because his lungs were full of fluid…That is obviously a direct reference to, and confirmation of, Dr Bannister’s wine and we don’t have to look back from there…Even though we have been repeatedly asking Jason to answer this for a week now he refuses…Instead he tries to lead us away from this unanswered conclusive evidence in to his demented nay-say trolling…
Dr Crompton obviously learned of that wine he was referencing from somewhere…I don’t think it was Dr Bannister because he hadn’t written his letter yet when Kathy heard that in 1991…Where Dr Crompton got that from I do not know…Kathy should have asked Crompton to clarify what he meant by lungs full of fluid and where he got it from, but the quote is good enough and it proves Jimi was drowned in wine…Jason’s trollishly ignoring it only proves it further…
In any case Crompton was a cautious professional so he knew that by saying Jimi had lungs full of fluid in relation to an Autopsy Report that listed one lung with no fluid, along with another lung with 400ml of fluid, that it would instantly mean that the original lungs full of fluid had been reduced to that amount by means of the resuscitation attempt listed on that Autopsy Report…The Hospital Report listed a half hour treatment time, so Crompton was professional enough, and practiced enough in pathology, to know that the lungs full of fluid he confirmed were reduced down to the 400ml of fluid during that half hour resuscitation attempt…
The second reason for Jason’s desperate switching of the subject is because he can’t deal with or answer Dr Siefert’s saying Jimi was covered in red wine…Common sense tells you that any wine soaking Jimi at St Mary’s had to be soaking him at the Samarkand so therefore Jason is lying when he says the ambulance men did not detect any wine on Jimi…Siefert’s wine was confirmed by Dr Brown when he detected it on Jimi and commented “Jimi had obviously had too much to drink”…This confirmed wine at the Samarkand is evidence of wine spilled in the act of forcing it down Jimi’s throat…It has to be because with a 5mg blood alcohol content there’s no other explanation for it forensically…
Jason and Ivana look pretty stupid trying to ignore this crushing proof and get around it with weak nay-saying filibuster denial trolling…Reality doesn’t work that way and by not being able to give this proof any answer they simply forfeit the debate and there is no need to respond to them anymore…
I blame Justin for this because when he refused to ban the obviously-trolling Jason he justified it by the logic that Jason had a right to free speech and the public had a right to see both sides…But it isn’t quite that simple and Justin has failed his responsibility to oversee his comments section properly…Free speech ends where the “shouting fire in a crowded theater” rule begins and Jason has clearly crossed that line…There is no normal reasonable person who would look at Jason’s postings and say he was honestly presenting a credible other side that he honestly believed…Jason is a sick pup and he is obviously here just to take the opposite side on everything and therefore he has ruined the quality of the comments section that was pretty good up until he showed up…Maliciously trolling persons do not have any credible right to free speech so the blame clearly lay on Justin’s doorstep for not screening crazies and therefore destroying the integrity of his own website…But I suppose deliberate destruction of good proof for Jimi’s murder is OK in England where they don’t want to admit they murdered Jimi…
That’s right, Buster, I am responsible for letting Jason and Ivana post here, just as I am responsible for letting YOU post here. As I said before, if you don’t like it, then move on…
Free speech does not involve anyone deciding what is “credible” or not as a criteria for others being able to share their thoughts. And, no, not a single person here has ever come close to shouting “fire” in a crowded theater.
You have used up my patience with your petty digs at me. I don’t want to see my name come up again because it has nothing to do with your disagreement (I was not present when Jimi died) and I have already made it abundantly clear that I am not going to do what you want. So, stay on topic and accept the rules of the house that permit everyone to speak or move the fuck on to your own private website where you can speak on this topic all day and silence any dissenting voices to your heart’s content.
The murder of Jimi Hendrix is a serious matter of serious consequence on a world level…Mr Ames, you are an international reporter who obviously had some kind of education in journalism and the intellectual standards and practices associated with it…You offer an internet magazine to the public that offers a fairly high level of journalistic content and material in its coverage of international travel and cultures…So therefore you must have some kind of sensibility over quality of content…
Sorry Mr Ames but since you are the one remonstrating me for my protest that means you are also the person responsible for the content of your comments section…You are clearly avoiding answering the point that you must have a cut-off line on posts…For instance you demonstrate that you have a cut-off line over my calling you out for not evaluating Jason’s input or taking responsibility for what you subject your regular commenters to by not judging his input…So you do have a limit on what you will tolerate…I’m sure if somebody started posting hardcore porn you would figure out a way to block it…
I’m sorry but my point remains unanswered by yourself and it is a very valid point…Free speech very much does involve deciding who is credible…When you get to the level of serious subject matter the Hendrix murder represents there is a higher standard that must be upheld…If you think free speech doesn’t involve judgments over credibility go stand up at a University symposium and start trolling nutty nay-saying like Jason offers and see how long your free speech rights last…I’m sorry but it seems like you have free speech and intellectual vetting standards backwards and seem to think that the intelligent judgment and appraisal of information that guides the best discourse is somehow an offense…Just the opposite, they are quite necessary accompaniments to credible debate and I’m surprised that I would have to explain that to someone who calls himself a journalist…Frankly your justifying this by saying “I wasn’t there when Jimi was murdered” insults some of the best evidence ever shown on the internet on the subject and your demand that we live down to Jason’s obvious trolling and accept it as equal free speech is an insult to our intelligence…It is quite foolish to look at what Jason offers and say it is Jason attempting to “share his thoughts”…And if you defend him and threaten me on a moderator level you are showing very bad judgement and failing to detect and act upon the real violator…Jason is definitely not here just to share his thoughts…He is here to maliciously disrupt and damage the discussion and make such an ugly mess that the public turns away from it and you are letting him…
Free speech absolutely does involve deciding who and what is credible…Otherwise the tolerance of persons of ill intent or even lack of skill will seriously damage the practice and outcome of that free speech…You can’t separate the right from the process…They are part of one thing…Jimi’s murder is not a trivial matter and in any debate I am involved in, as one of the world’s top experts on the subject, I demand the respect and decency of serious input, intent, and intelligence…My protests are not “petty”…They are quite serious and are asking you to please save your comments section from being hijacked by what most internet moderators would easily see is a disingenuous troll who has no intent of offering any sincere input or recognizing facts…You are giving not only unrestricted, but preferred, access to a person who is not arguing honestly and is taking advantage of the lack of any scrutiny of his input to do so…Because of that he is being allowed to destroy the integrity of the debate by lying, trolling, and ignoring correct evidence…
Justin: Besides “All trolls are welcomed and you are free to lie, ridicule, mock, and ignore good evidence, what “rules of the house” are there on this site exactly?…It seems like the only enforced rule here is there will be no tolerated protest over the moderator turning the other way and allowing a clearly obvious malicious troll to hijack the site and stupidly troll the best and brightest with no punishment…You show bad judgment in honoring Jason’s trolling as a “dissenting voice” that I am trying to silence…And frankly if you have more resentment against me than Jason you are only proving my point…If anyone is the dissenting voice here it is myself and you have failed to answer or live up to a genuine protest that has serious merit…If the rules here are allowing and backing obvious trolls then there’s something wrong with the rules…No serious observer would grant Jason credit for offering genuine or honestly-intended input…The bottom line is if Jason calls for evidence but then ignores it he’s got to be held accountable or the website becomes a farce and whether you admit it or not you are responsible for that…
Instead of producing real Hospital documents of wine to state his phony case, like we ask him to, “Buster” attacks me and the site owner in a pathetic display. This is how we know “Buster” has lost his phony hoax. If “Buster” was credible, he would easily be able to post forensic and documented evidence to prove what he claims. He cannot, so he goes on the attack instead. Buster blows hot air instead of posting real evidence. I’ve refuted him many times with forensic evidence, documented evidence, and expert witness testimony. All Buster does is change his fake claims to something else or attack me cuz he has nothin’. He has done it again in this post. Pathetic.
We ask Buster to produce documented evidence from St. Mary Abbots Hospital that states Jimi Hendrix was “drowned in wine”. If Jimi was, there would be documents to prove, cuz hospitals document everything. Unless Buster producers this evidence, he will always lose his phony wine hoax.
BUSTER says: Jason is trying to switch the subject and divert from the previous material where he was thoroughly refuted…He wants us to chase him down his trolling rabbit holes where he can continue to draw us in to his trolling in order to post more nay-saying denials…Jason isn’t a serious or credible character…He’s just an internet crazy who thinks it is a fun game to troll Jimi’s murder…
JASON says: Jimi was not “murdered” and you have no proof of it after 10 years of trying. Not one doctor, medical attendant, pathologist, or coroner ever stated Jimi was “murdered”.
Ambulance Men John Saua and Reginal Jones stated Jimi died from a drug overdose in their testimony. They never said he was “murdered” or even hinted at it. Officer Ian Smith confirmed it as well, when he said “he received a lot of calls like that in those days. John Saua from his ambulance, called Officer Smith to the flat who was referencing a drug overdose. Officer Smith wasn’t responding to mass “wine drownings” in 1970. If Jimi was “murdered” Smith would have made it a crime scene.
You can’t produce any medical hospital documents stating Jimi was “drowned in wine” or had “wine removal procedures”. These documents would already had been released if this was the case. I’ve been asking you since July to produce anything that officially states wine, and you ignore it, and instead blow hot air like you’re doing here now. And if your theory was real, you would easily be able to produce documents proving your theory. None exist so you can’t. That’s why your theory is a hoax.
Also, St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed to the media and to the public on 9/18/70 that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose. They never said he was “drowned in wine” or “covered in wine”. You continuously ignore this and push your hoax. That ends you phony hoax right there.
All your fake wine claims are after the fact post 1992 cooked up by Fraud Bannister. All this imaginary wine you claim, and you can’t produce one single document that says there was wine. There was no wine cuz it doesn’t exist.
I have not changed the subject. I’m just posting all your lies and contradictions that you’ve been doing for years. You have no case, which is why you resort to lying and making stuff up for your fake evidence. You lied claiming the ambulance men witnessed “massive amounts’ of wine. They never witnessed any wine which proves there was no “wine drowning” and ends your phony hoax.
You’ve refuted nothing. You’re the one who’s been refuted. I just posted all the main points you’ve lied about and contradicted yourself with your phony hoax. Everybody can read them. I’ve asked you since July to post documented evidence of the imaginary wine and you can’t do it. You’ve lost your phony hoax.
Jimi was not “murdered”. All the documented forensic evidence, witness testimony, and the absence of your imaginary wine proves that he wasn’t. Also, the fact that you change your fake stories, make up new ones, contradict yourself, and distort the real evidence with blatant lies proves it as well.
BUSTER says: We won this debate long ago when Jason could not publicly answer Dr Crompton’s statement to Kathy Etchingham that Jimi could not have been breathing when he arrived at hospital because his lungs were full of fluid…That is obviously a direct reference to, and confirmation of, Dr Bannister’s wine and we don’t have to look back from there…Even though we have been repeatedly asking Jason to answer this for a week now he refuses…Instead he tries to lead us away from this unanswered conclusive evidence in to his demented nay-say trolling…
JASON says: You haven’t won anything since you have no “wine”. Wine was not witnessed at the flat and you have no documentation to prove your imaginary wine All the real evidence and forensic prove it was a drug overdose.
Here’s another lie by you. I’ve already refuted this claim from you. Dr Teare established in his autopsy, that Jimi Hendrix had 400 ml of fluid in his chest. Nothing was documented by Teare about any “wine” or “wine in his lungs” which I already refuted you with. Jimi was already dead, moron. All you do is repeat the same fake clams over and over again.
Obviously, you know nothing about the real history of Jimi Hendrix, cuz everybody knew that Jimi had fluid in his chest since September 29, 1970 when the autopsy results were released. Wine trolls such as yourself, changed the fluid to wine, to push your phony hoax. Nobody needs Crompton to tell us what we already knew before
During Dr. Teare’s forensic analysis, the fluid detected no wine, and no wine was analyzed anywhere on Jimi’s body or inside his lungs. This proves no wine ever existed. You have no wine to account for or any medical documents to prove it. Your fake hoax is finished.
BUSTER says: Dr Crompton obviously learned of that wine he was referencing from somewhere…I don’t think it was Dr Bannister because he hadn’t written his letter yet when Kathy heard that in 1991…Where Dr Crompton got that from I do not know…Kathy should have asked Crompton to clarify what he meant by lungs full of fluid and where he got it from, but the quote is good enough and it proves Jimi was drowned in wine…Jason’s trollishly ignoring it only proves it further…
JASON says: As a fraud does, “Buster” uses circumstantial quotes to claim his phony case to be correct. Sorry, that’s not how it works. The real forensic evidence determined 49 years ago already refutes you.
Dr Teare already established 49 years ago, that Jimi had 400 ml of fluid in his chest. No wine was ever detected anywhere on or in Jimi’s body. This has been known since September 29, 1970. And you are right, you don’t know anything relevant to this case, except for the bogus conspiracies you peddle.
BUSTER says: In any case Crompton was a cautious professional so he knew that by saying Jimi had lungs full of fluid in relation to an Autopsy Report that listed one lung with no fluid, along with another lung with 400ml of fluid, that it would instantly mean that the original lungs full of fluid had been reduced to that amount by means of the resuscitation attempt listed on that Autopsy Report…The Hospital Report listed a half hour treatment time, so Crompton was professional enough, and practiced enough in pathology, to know that the lungs full of fluid he confirmed were reduced down to the 400ml of fluid during that half hour resuscitation attempt…
JASON says: More bogus nonsense since there was no “treatment”. Jimi was a dead 6 hour rotting corpse, Siefert refuted these bogus claims telling us he “did nothing for Jimi”, Bob Brown says no “treatments” were done, and no documents exist of a fake “wine removal”.
Mr. Big Shot “Buster” can talk about fake “treatments”, but can never put his money where his mouth is and produce these hospital “wine removal” documents for what he claims. If this actually happened, Buster could easily produce them for us. Since this never happened, he can’t produce them. That’s why he rages in anger demanding that I get banned for exposing his hoax.
BUSTER says: The second reason for Jason’s desperate switching of the subject is because he can’t deal with or answer Dr Siefert’s saying Jimi was covered in red wine…Common sense tells you that any wine soaking Jimi at St Mary’s had to be soaking him at the Samarkand so therefore Jason is lying when he says the ambulance men did not detect any wine on Jimi…Siefert’s wine was confirmed by Dr Brown when he detected it on Jimi and commented “Jimi had obviously had too much to drink”…This confirmed wine at the Samarkand is evidence of wine spilled in the act of forcing it down Jimi’s throat…It has to be because with a 5mg blood alcohol content there’s no other explanation for it forensically…
JASON says: More blatant lies, story changes, phony stories, and the same fake commentary from this clown. Buster still can’t produce any evidence of this imaginary wine. I’ve answered and refuted his phony claims each and every time and he still says I haven’t answered them. Ridiculous.
There is no documentation of “Jimi being soaked in wine” on any hospital document. It would be documented on his medical file if he “was soaked in wine”. No file ever exists of Jimi “being soaked in wine”. Dr. Thurston documented nothing about wine involving Jimi Hendrix, either on him or inside him, in Thurston’s final report. If all this wine was all over Jimi and inside Jimi, all the reports would have stated that. No reports ever say anything about wine. It’s always drugs. This ends this phony wine hoax.
Buster the clown types a terrible and fraudulent lie. John Saua and Reginal Jones, the ambulance men, never stated anything about witnessing wine at the flat, on the bed, on Jimi’s body, or inside his throat. I’ve proven this in all my series and all my postings.
“Buster” claims I’m lying, when I stated many times that the ambulance men witnessed no wine. Ok “Buster”…..produce documented testimony where Reginal Jones or John Saua, the ambulance men, state they witnessed Jimi being “soaked in wine”.
Dr. Teare documented in his autopsy report that Jimi Hendrix’s blood alcohol level was 100 mg per 100 ml, which was over the legal limit to fail a breathalyzer test. This is documented forensic evidence that anybody can look up. “Buster” is a troll who is lying about the official autopsy evidence so he can push his debunked hoax.
It “doesn’t have to be” anything since you are making this crap up in your head for your hoax.
All “Buster” can do is lie and make crap up for his hoax. Dr. Bob Brown has never said anywhere that Jimi was “covered in wine”. Bob Brown said Jimi died from a drug overdose and had and “bit” too much to drink cuz he was citing the official autopsy report. But the troll ignores the real evidence to push is phony hoax instead,.
“I happened to be in the causality at St Mary’s Abbott when Jimi Hendrix was brought in. The man had been dead some time. The supposition is that he had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
“He had been dead for some hours,” Brown said. “He’d had a bit too much to drink and whatever else and had inhaled vomitus.”- Dr. Bob Brown
JASON says: Dr. Bob Brown confirms Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose in two different testimonies.
First, Brown said Jimi was dead for many hours and died of a drug overdose in which no revival was possible. That means no “treatments” were performed like Buster the troll lies about. Also, Brown said nothing about “wine ” or a “wine related” Hendrix death. Brown confirmed it was a drug overdose. But Buster he troll ignores this and lies.
Second, Brown said Jimi had a “bit” too much to drink. Brown was citing Dr. Teare’s autopsy result that confirmed Jimi’s blood alcohol level was 100 mg per 100 ml, which was over the legal limit to fail a breathalyzer test. That is a “bit” too much to drink. Then Brown said Jimi inhaled vomit, which confirms the cause of Jimi’s death of inhalation of vomit. Nowhere did Brown say Jimi ” was drowned in wine” or a wine related death. Buster the clown has been refuted by Bob Brown.
BUSTER says: Jason and Ivana look pretty stupid trying to ignore this crushing proof and get around it with weak nay-saying filibuster denial trolling…Reality doesn’t work that way and by not being able to give this proof any answer they simply forfeit the debate and there is no need to respond to them anymore…
JASON says: Fake claims made up by you is not “crushing proof”. You have no documents to prove anything.
“Buster” concedes defeat since he has no documents to prove for his phony wine claim. He looks stupid in each post he gets debunked by me and Ivana.
Reality works with real evidence, forensic science, and witness testimony that defeats your phony hoax.
BUSTER says: I blame Justin for this because when he refused to ban the obviously-trolling Jason he justified it by the logic that Jason had a right to free speech and the public had a right to see both sides…But it isn’t quite that simple and Justin has failed his responsibility to oversee his comments section properly…Free speech ends where the “shouting fire in a crowded theater” rule begins and Jason has clearly crossed that line…
JASON says: First of all, this is not your site, and you have no business demanding for people to be banned who disagree with you. You’ve been banned from every site you’ve been on for your abusive behavior, trolling, and blatant lying. You have some nerve Buster.
You have the free speech to make up your blatant lies and I have the free speech to counter your lies. You don’t like that fact that I’ve exposed your hoax and you want me to be silenced. Sorry, that’s not how reality works.
BUSTER says: There is no normal reasonable person who would look at Jason’s postings and say he was honestly presenting a credible other side that he honestly believed…
JASON says: This is your bogus opinion. Everything I’ve posted is documented evidence either by forensic, media reported, doctor, or witness testimony that proves the official record. All you do is whine and claim it’s a “cover up” or change the real facts to one of your newly made up fake claims to troll. Just like the ambulance men never spoke about wine in their testimony, you lie anyway claiming they did, when there is no testimony of wine from them. You are a fraudulent liar.
BUSTER says: Jason is a sick pup and he is obviously here just to take the opposite side on everything and therefore he has ruined the quality of the comments section that was pretty good up until he showed up…
JASON says: You are posting lies and fake stories and this is a public site for people to express what they like on Jimi Hendrix. Only a troll like you, who wants Jimi to be “murdered” based on fake stories, is the one who is sick.
BUSTER says: Maliciously trolling persons do not have any credible right to free speech so the blame clearly lay on Justin’s doorstep for not screening crazies and therefore destroying the integrity of his own website…But I suppose deliberate destruction of good proof for Jimi’s murder is OK in England where they don’t want to admit they murdered Jimi…
JASON says: Another b.s, lie. I’m posting real evidence, and you don’t like that the fact that it exposed your hoax as a fraud. Well, that’s too bad. There is nothing malicious about posting the truth.
Quit being a coward attacking me and the site owner and produce evidence for your phony claims.
All the evidence I’ve posted refutes you and that’s why you are angry.
More whining and crying from Buster who is still unable to post any documented reports from St. Mary Abbots Hospital for the imaginary wine he claims. This is why Buster will always lose his phony hoax, since he cannot defend it against a credible poster like myself.
Buster can’t produce any real documented evidence for his phony wine claims. He desperately wants me to be silenced for exposing his hoax and his lies. So, his only recourse is to threaten the site owner and cry like a child throwing a temper tantrum. Buster cries Jim was “murdered” in wine. All Buster has to do is post documented reports of all this wine he claims from St. Mary Abbots Hospital. If there was wine, it would be documented. Buster still can’t do it, which proves his wine hoax to be just that…a total fraud.
BUSTER says: The murder of Jimi Hendrix is a serious matter of serious consequence on a world level…Mr Ames, you are an international reporter who obviously had some kind of education in journalism and the intellectual standards and practices associated with it…You offer an internet magazine to the public that offers a fairly high level of journalistic content and material in its coverage of international travel and cultures…So therefore you must have some kind of sensibility over quality of content…
JASON says: First of all, this is a public forum, and you don’t get to dictate who is allowed to post on this site. This is not your site. This is a public site. The content you post is mostly fantasy stories made up by yourself in your own head that you continuously contradict yourself with. I’ve just shown that to you and the readers this morning.
Jimi Hendrix was not “murdered”, and the forensic evidence proved he died from a drug overdose 49 years ago. If Fraud Bannister didn’t decide to lie about wine in 1992 cuz he thought he was going to be sued for malpractice, then you wouldn’t be talking about this hoax today.
This topic can’t be serious to you, especially when you violate the rules of evidence by changing your phony claims every chance you get. One day you claim “Jimi was forced drowned in wine” then you say “no on would need to force wine into Jimi”. Then you say he was “soaked in wine” then you say “he was covered in vomit but vomit means wine”. Then you fraudulently lie about what the doctors and witnesses said adding your fake scenarios to their testimony .You are not an honest and serous poster when you fraudulently lie making up bogus claims that never happened. You do this all the time here, and is the reason why you were banned from many sites for doing so.
BUSTER says: Sorry Mr Ames but since you are the one remonstrating me for my protest that means you are also the person responsible for the content of your comments section…You are clearly avoiding answering the point that you must have a cut-off line on posts…For instance you demonstrate that you have a cut-off line over my calling you out for not evaluating Jason’s input or taking responsibility for what you subject your regular commenters to by not judging his input…So you do have a limit on what you will tolerate…I’m sure if somebody started posting hardcore porn you would figure out a way to block it…
JASON says: You have no business demanding what I can or can’t post on this site. I’m posting facts and you are not . In all honesty, you should have been banned from this site months ago, when you lace your unhinged posts with obscenities against me and Ivana. You also just making up blatant lies for your hoax without any documentation. It’s only your own fantasy scenarios. Let me remind you that you were banned from every site you posted on for this behavior. You are the problem sir.
BUSTER says: I’m sorry but my point remains unanswered by yourself and it is a very valid point…Free speech very much does involve deciding who is credible…When you get to the level of serious subject matter the Hendrix murder represents there is a higher standard that must be upheld…If you think free speech doesn’t involve judgments over credibility go stand up at a University symposium and start trolling nutty nay-saying like Jason offers and see how long your free speech rights last…I’m sorry but it seems like you have free speech and intellectual vetting standards backwards and seem to think that the intelligent judgment and appraisal of information that guides the best discourse is somehow an offense…Just the opposite, they are quite necessary accompaniments to credible debate and I’m surprised that I would have to explain that to someone who calls himself a journalist…Frankly your justifying this by saying “I wasn’t there when Jimi was murdered” insults some of the best evidence ever shown on the internet on the subject and your demand that we live down to Jason’s obvious trolling and accept it as equal free speech is an insult to our intelligence…It is quite foolish to look at what Jason offers and say it is Jason attempting to “share his thoughts”…And if you defend him and threaten me on a moderator level you are showing very bad judgement and failing to detect and act upon the real violator…Jason is definitely not here just to share his thoughts…He is here to maliciously disrupt and damage the discussion and make such an ugly mess that the public turns away from it and you are letting him…
JASON says: Pathetic how this coward “Buster” is bullying Justin behind his keyboard demanding that I get banned for posting factual evidence.
“Buster” is the one who is nay saying the real documented evidence that refutes his hoax. Each time I post documented testimony and factual forensic evidence that refutes his hoax, he cries it’s a “cover up” or makes some bogus excuse so he can still push his debunked hoax. What a lying fraud. It’s pathetic and Buster knows it which is why he demands that I be silenced. What a damn joke.
BUSTER says: Free speech absolutely does involve deciding who and what is credible…Otherwise the tolerance of persons of ill intent or even lack of skill will seriously damage the practice and outcome of that free speech…You can’t separate the right from the process…They are part of one thing…Jimi’s murder is not a trivial matter and in any debate I am involved in, as one of the world’s top experts on the subject, I demand the respect and decency of serious input, intent, and intelligence…My protests are not “petty”…They are quite serious and are asking you to please save your comments section from being hijacked by what most internet moderators would easily see is a disingenuous troll who has no intent of offering any sincere input or recognizing facts…You are giving not only unrestricted, but preferred, access to a person who is not arguing honestly and is taking advantage of the lack of any scrutiny of his input to do so…Because of that he is being allowed to destroy the integrity of the debate by lying, trolling, and ignoring correct evidence…
JASON says: You are a clown and are no “expert” on Jimi Hendrix. You have proven that since July that you are not. I’ve destroyed your hoax and you are angry which is why you are crying that I am banned. You have no right to demand anything. You’ve been banned and laughed off many forums for being a crackpot.
I’m posting real forensic documented evidence and documented witness testimony that debunks your fake hoax. All the lying and ignoring the documented evidence is coming from you when cry “cover up” each time you are debunked.
I’ve posted the exact media statement from St. Mary Abbots Hospital that clearly stated Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose. You ignore it and still push your fake “murder” hoax as you nay say real evidence that refutes you.
“We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.” – Media statement from St. Mary Abbots Hospital on Jimi Hendrix’s death 9/18/70
Right there in black and white, St. Mary Abbots Hospital states to the world that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose on 9/18/70. Not one damn word about the fake wine you claim. All the doctors had to agree about the cause of death before a statement can be made. They stated it was an overdose. You lose your hoax on this documented statement. You ignore this documented evidence as you nay say with your fake hoax. The hospital refutes and debunks your fake hoax, You have no answer for this
BUSTER says: Justin: Besides “All trolls are welcomed and you are free to lie, ridicule, mock, and ignore good evidence, what “rules of the house” are there on this site exactly?…It seems like the only enforced rule here is there will be no tolerated protest over the moderator turning the other way and allowing a clearly obvious malicious troll to hijack the site and stupidly troll the best and brightest with no punishment…You show bad judgment in honoring Jason’s trolling as a “dissenting voice” that I am trying to silence…And frankly if you have more resentment against me than Jason you are only proving my point…If anyone is the dissenting voice here it is myself and you have failed to answer or live up to a genuine protest that has serious merit…If the rules here are allowing and backing obvious trolls then there’s something wrong with the rules…No serious observer would grant Jason credit for offering genuine or honestly-intended input…The bottom line is if Jason calls for evidence but then ignores it he’s got to be held accountable or the website becomes a farce and whether you admit it or not you are responsible for that…
JASON says: The official death record of Jimi Hendrix proves Jimi died from inhalation of vomit due to a barbiturate overdose. All the factual and documented evidence that I’ve posted proves that, and you nay say all evidence that refutes you.
You are posting garbage clams that you’ve made up, that is not evidence. So yes, I’m going to ignore it since it is all fake. Every intelligent person ignores the fake claims you post at all the sites you posted at and were later banned from.
You make up fake evidence and change the testimony from witnesses.to push your fake hoax. That is fraudulent and called trolling. You have no business demanding posters to be banned for disagreeing with you. You have no business bullying the site owner either cuz you lost your wine hoax.
What you are doing is pissing on Jimi Hendrix and it’s disgusting.
Hi Jason. Buster etc needs to accept the findings of Kathy’s investigation and leave it at that and move on. Nothing in that report ever hinted that Jimi was the victim of foul play. Kathy was suspicious about Monika’s statements about what occurred that morning so she set out along with Dee Mitchell and Michael Fairchild to find and interview the main players. The most important statement came from Dr. Crompton who confirmed what Dr. Teare wrote in his report about the toxic level of barbiturates in Jimi’s system causing his death. He never said that the wine caused his death. Because Buster truly believes Jimi was murdered he will never accept the true findings and will continue with his accusations of murder; he will always come up empty handed however because there was no murder. He denies this important fact by saying that there was a cover up and everyone was coerced into changing the real findings. These are just Buster’s thoughts and suspicions sourced from sensationalist books. I see that he has brought Justin into this debate again trying to get us banned because he doesn’t like what we write. He needs to be reminded that he has been banned from other sites because of his objectionable comments.
IVANA says: Hi Jason. Buster etc needs to accept the findings of Kathy’s investigation and leave it at that and move on.
JASON says: Hi Ivana. Yes he does, “Buster” is intent on pushing his debunked hoax when all the real evidence overwhelmingly refutes him. I see he made up a fake “alfienueman” name to attack us with. Pathetic.
IVANA says: Nothing in that report ever hinted that Jimi was the victim of foul play.
JASON says: Correct, and neither did anybody who Kathy spoke with for the documented testimony of her investigation ever hinted at “murder”. Even Kathy doesn’t believe these fake “murder” conspiracies and she did the real investigation.
IVANA says: Kathy was suspicious about Monika’s statements about what occurred that morning so she set out along with Dee Mitchell and Michael Fairchild to find and interview the main players.
JASON says: Indeed she was, and all the main players never spoke about wine. They all confirmed it was drug related. No wine was ever talked about at the death scene from 3 men. But “Buster” has just lied again claiming they witnessed wine. Buster won’t be able to point to any testimony of his imaginary wine cuz no wine exists.
IVANA says: The most important statement came from Dr. Crompton who confirmed what Dr. Teare wrote in his report about the toxic level of barbiturates in Jimi’s system causing his death. He never said that the wine caused his death.
JASON says: The level was confirmed to be more toxic than we even knew about. “Buster is trying to make the “fluid” his new claim to fame which debunks his whole fake wine hoax.
Teare already established in 1970 that Jimi had 400 ml of fluid in his chest. That’s old news. Everybody who knows Hendrix history already knew that. But what this moron “Buster” doesn’t understand is, that fluid in Jimi was forensically analyzed, and no wine was detected. That destroys his fake wine hoax
Also, no fluid should be in Jimi, cuz “Buster” and his pal Fraud Bannister claim Bannister removed all the fluids out of Jimi 3 days before. This completely destroys their fake “treatment” and phony “wine removal” cuz no fluid should still be there. I’ve already posted this before and the idiot keeps saying I’ve never answered it. He is nuts.
IVANA says: Because Buster truly believes Jimi was murdered he will never accept the true findings and will continue with his accusations of murder; he will always come up empty handed however because there was no murder. He denies this important fact by saying that there was a cover up and everyone was coerced into changing the real findings. These are just Buster’s thoughts and suspicions sourced from sensationalist books.
JASON says: Buster wants to believe in an imaginary fairy tale of fake wine so he makes up his own evidence so he can still believe. That is called being delusional. He should accept the facts and face reality that no wine exists. He also uses now uses fake alias names to attack us with like “alfienueman”.
IVANA says: I see that he has brought Justin into this debate again trying to get us banned because he doesn’t like what we write. He needs to be reminded that he has been banned from other sites because of his objectionable comments.
JASON says: “Buster” is just a pathetic hypocrite. He feels he can post whatever he wants wherever he wants, and if he doesn’t like what you write, he calls you a troll and demands for you to be banned. Totally laughable.
“Buster” was banned from many sites and forums for abusive posts, lying, trolling, using several fake id accounts to give himself fake credibility, and breaking the site rules. He was even banned from Wikipedia and Amazon for abuse and breaking the terms of service rules. That should tell you all you need to know about “Buster”, the man of many pseudonyms
Buster, as you well know, no publication in the world takes responsibility for the comments section beneath published articles. I have neither the time, desire or expertise to do so either. I will clean out spammy advertising and individuals that annoy me (my prerogative as the owner of the site and I make no apologies for it), but that is all. I have only ejected three individuals, however, in twelve years, so I am not exactly heavy-handed in that. As I have said repeatedly, anyone that doesn’t like the manner in which affairs are conducted here is entirely free to move on. I am not going to change this policy simply because you disagree with it. So, stop wasting my time and yours by trying to draw me in with petty insults. I place a high value on my free time and I’m not going to warn you again.
And, to be clear, no, I have no problem at all with someone posting hardcore porn in the comments section as long as it is good porn…
Lastly, I would certainly not hold up the world of academia as a role model for free speech standards when they have become one of the least welcoming places on the planet for dissenting speech and thought.
I’m not sure where you were educated in journalism Mr Ames but what you say above is ridiculously not true…If you observe the comments or editorial section of the most credible publications they invariably discriminate between content the more credible and intelligent they are…Major newspapers and medical journals absolutely do screen content in their public comments and it is done by skilled editors…
All said, the point is still not answered that if you tell the person who is probably the world’s top authority on the subject of Hendrix’s murder he can always leave if he doesn’t like it, in defense of an obviously sick character like Jason and his objectively demented input, there’s something seriously wrong by the basic journalistic standards you practice as an occupation…
I am not making petty insults here I am lodging a formal protest with the person who is ultimately responsible for the problem that still remains unanswered…Because you make an effort to justify your lack of scrutiny of content as your main intent you have allowed a disreputable character to hijack your website’s comments section and destroy what was otherwise a very good repository for information on Jimi’s death…You might think your apology in defense of so-called free speech is valid but it isn’t and it still hasn’t answered the issue…Jason is being allowed to viciously troll the good evidence with no restriction…You might say you have a right to ignore it and shirk your responsibility as moderator but you don’t and a serious wrong is being allowed…
When a sick person like Jason is allowed to enter lies and trolling on an equal basis he is not being given the tolerated right to dissent, but is instead being given the advantage because he is not being held responsible for his serious wrongdoing…When we are being held to a strict non-standard of non-moderation while Jason is allowed to troll openly, with it being labeled a “right to dissent”, the people who are making the good case with the good evidence are not getting the judgment they deserve while a deviant character is being openly rewarded…
The word “dissent” connotes a person promoting a valid case against a wrong majority…Seeing the bigger picture here, the majority with the wrong cause are definitely those who back the official story, since it has been accepted and gone unchallenged by the public as well as a majority of ignorant Hendrix fans…So the “dissenter” here is in no way Jason…In any case, in no way can Jason’s demented input ever be validly described as legitimate dissent…Any person of normal good judgment could see Jason is not offering sincerely-felt arguments or material…Justin, have some sense man, Jason is obviously trolling and doing so by any objective standard…That means he does not respect you, your website, or your comments section whether you have time to scrutinize its contents or not…
And, yes, I agree that the mainstream media and world of academia are some of the least free speech-upholding places around…And that is exactly why these comments sections are so important as the last vestiges of free speech and the important knowledge it provides…As is their being properly moderated to make sure ill-intended kooks like Jason don’t damage their content…
The reason I protest is because I have seen Jason and his lies win over on the Hendrix Crosstown Torrents website…What Jason does here is not without consequence, which is why he does it so strongly…After I stood up for the correct evidence on that board the vast majority of members preferred Jason’s input and used it as a rationale to ban me…As a matter of fact I was banned immediately after making a post about the importance of free speech and how Jimi stood for that free speech…But free speech is meaningless if it isn’t accompanied by common sense and responsibility for what that speech entails…One cannot rightly cite free speech to its ultimate end but then shirk off the responsibility that comes with it…”Petty”? – nay!…Just the opposite…
The overseer of the uncredible Crosstown Torrents board is British…His name is Gordon Johnson and he has connections to the London “JimPress” Hendrix publication…That publication never once did any credible article on Jimi’s death…I dare say that there seems to be a tendency to tolerate uncredible denial, censorship, and opposition to the evidence for Jimi’s murder from British-overseen sources…Is it because the British are reluctant to admit they murdered Jimi?…So where does the real center of gravity lay for the free speech and dissent?…
Buster, if your behavior at those other sites matches your behavior at this one, it is likely you were ejected for lacking any social graces rather than for the content you were posting. As you apparently misunderstood last time, let me make this as clear to you as possible: DO. NOT. INVOLVE. ME. IN. THE. COMMENTS. SECTION. AGAIN.
Free Speech is ALL speech, Buster. Even the speech that you find repugnant. You are either for ALL of it or… you are for none of it. We don’t need people deciding FOR us what to think, see or hear.
I do not care to involve myself in this fight and you are missing every social cue making that clear to the point where I wonder if you are not on the spectrum? I have been consistent and definite that I am not going to ban anyone posting about Jimi Hendrix and that I vehemently disagree with your perverted version of “free speech.”
Thus, your continued consumption of my time on this matter is ratcheting up the level of my annoyance to the point where it also makes me wonder if you want to get tossed out so that you can feel like a martyr?
Brian Doyle aka Buster is just a whiner and a hypocrite. He cries his eyes out because forum moderators banned him from their site crying they denied his “free speech”.
Here he cries each day to have me banned for posting facts and exposing his hoax wanting to deny my free speech.
Total hypocrite and a clown..
“Buster” cries and demands that I get banned for exposing his fake “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax”. I’m just posting real documented evidence and exposing all “Buster’s” lies for all to see. Nothing wrong with that. Buster needs to be held accountable and keep this site held to a high standard of verified and credible facts. Not bogus phony made up claims he chooses for the day.
Here is another fine example of “Buster’s” aka Brian Doyle’s blatant trolling as he changes his fake claims when it suits his needs so he can claim he won a “debate”. This is pathetic.
BUSTER says: Dr Bannister specified that he removed a plug of vomit from Hendrix’s windpipe and the wine then gushed out.
BUSTER says: Bannister never saw the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat because Siefert and the nurses removed it before he got to the scene…
JASON says: Buster first says that Fraud Bannister removed the fake “hard plug of vomit”.
Then after i exposed Bannister as a fraud in my “Bannister Series”, “Buster the troll” changes his story to Siefert removing the fake “hard plug of vomit” and has Fraud Bannister nowhere to be seen.
Now this is blatant trolling and changing stories. This is why we know this is all a scam and Jimi was not “murdered”. Real events do not change anytime “Buster” wants it to. Buster changes these fake claims of his pretending it’s real evidence. This is a hoax and this dude is mentally off.
This is why I do not believe this fake “murder hoax” when “Buster” just makes up these fake stories each time he posts. Then “Buster” has the nerve to call this blatant lying “good evidence” and demand that I am banned for exposing this blatant fraud.
We all can see in black and white how Buster aka Brian Doyle changes one fake claim to the next and whines “Jimi was murdered”. Based on what? He has no evidence. Just made up lies in his crazy head he calls evidence. All the readers are nodding their head in agreement.
This is blatant lying Buster, you can’t run and hide from your lies and fake story changes. You need to be held accountable for what you post. Changing fake stories proves you are running a 10 year hoax. You are no world’s expert on Jimi Hendrix.
That’s why you became angry and demanded for me to be banned.
That’s pathetic.
This is your only fault for lying and pushing a fraudulent hoax. You got caught red handed
BUSTER says: Dr Bannister specified that he removed a plug of vomit from Hendrix’s windpipe and the wine then gushed out.
BUSTER says: Bannister never saw the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat because Siefert and the nurses removed it before he got to the scene…
.
Hi Jason, I stated getting suspicious about Buster’s claims when he said he had spoken to all these people and they told him things off camera. What he is presenting here is not evidence but opinion disguised as fact. His long winded rants are full of hot air and little substance he just substituted the real facts for his phony ones. It reminds me of an X File episode where Mulder and Scully are having a deep and meaningful conversation about the health of a man in their car. It sounded wonderful but meant nothing; it was just full of pseudo scientific jargon intended to hoodwink the listener into believing it just like Buster etc. has been trying to do for years. I’m glad we caught him out as someone who uses different names on different sites and just regurgitates the same stuff over and over again. I don’t think he knows anything about Jimi Hendrix and his music he just wants to push his fake murder scenario hoping people will buy into it like you said Jason.
Hi Ivana,
That’s all “Buster” can do is claim he spoke to someone “off camera” or had a “private conversation” with him and he claims it is “evidence”. All his claimed “private conversations” are phony over the top claims. Far fetched nonsense.
“Buster’s” entire phony hoax is based on his opinion making absurd claims. He starts with a theory and says it “probably” happened like this or it “could be” that and he constructs this fantasy scenario of what he claims is a real event. It is only fiction and fantasy and he never provides any real evidence, only unconfirmed quotes from an author in a book. He discredits all the real witnesses.
There is no reason for him to have all those fake name accounts. That only means he is trolling.
I’ve never seen him post anything about Jimi’s music or anything about him other than the conspiracy crap he reads out of books and pushes.
He has all his own fake answers to his fake claims and he demands you answer them or you have “lost the debate” lol
Jason refuses to give an honest or direct answer to Dr Crompton telling Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that “Jimi could not have been breathing when he arrived at hospital because his lungs were full of fluid”…There’s only one thing that fluid could be so it makes our case for us…
If you look at Jason’s response he refuses to deal with Crompton’s statement directly and tries to get out of it by trollishly changing the subject…Jason is trying to avoid admitting that Crompton’s statement completely destroys his previous lie that Jimi “only had dry vomit”…Jason is conspicuously evading answering what exactly was Dr Crompton talking about when he said that?…How exactly did Jimi end up with lungs full of fluid?…How did he get that way?…And what exactly was the fluid?…
Jason’s obvious, specious evasion avoids answering all this but it also avoids answering the fact that if Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid when he arrived at St Mary’s, and Teare noted only 400ml of fluid in one lung, then there had to be a removal of that fluid in between…That is plainly obvious from this evidence, as is Jason’s clearly uncredible denial and evasion of it…We’ve proven that Dr Bannister’s case is backed-up by the facts with this and the true record shows there was a half hour removal of Crompton’s “lungs full of fluid”…It can’t be any other way if the evidence shows Jimi went from having “lungs full of fluid” to having only 400ml of fluid in one lung…Anyone who looks at Jason’s responses will see he has failed to credibly answer this and the response he did make is obviously evasive and pathetic…By debate rules that means we win…
Jason is also very aware that when we finally get the Hospital Report it will say exactly what we’ve been quoting…Jason is just as aware as we are that the Hospital Report will say in plain language “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15″…Platt obviously accessed that report when he quoted it accurately in his book when he wrote it in 1989…That half hour treatment time corroborates Bannister and proves Siefert is lying…
Lastly, when David Kramer puts out his documentary we will see Siefert corroborate Bannister in plain language when he says on video “Jimi was covered in red wine”…This demented asshole Jason knows this is true but he gets his rocks off denial trolling it…When that documentary comes out then the true version of events will have all 3 doctors, Brown, Bannister, and Siefert all confirming the wine Jimi got soaked in when they forced it down his throat…
May Jason be burned in hell…
Same old trolling tactics and more hot air from Buster. Still no documented evidence for his phony wine claims but he says “someday we will get them”. Maybe in 10 more years when he is still making the same phony claims. LOL.
BUSTER says: Jason refuses to give an honest or direct answer to Dr Crompton telling Kathy Etchingham in 1991 that “Jimi could not have been breathing when he arrived at hospital because his lungs were full of fluid”…There’s only one thing that fluid could be so it makes our case for us…
JASON says: You are a lousy troll. I’ve answered this several times including yesterday. Your failed trolling technique is to claim I haven’t “answered” your comment so you can disingenuously say “you won your phony case”. We are all aware of your trolling tricks.
BUSTER says: If you look at Jason’s response he refuses to deal with Crompton’s statement directly and tries to get out of it by trollishly changing the subject…Jason is trying to avoid admitting that Crompton’s statement completely destroys his previous lie that Jimi “only had dry vomit”…Jason is conspicuously evading answering what exactly was Dr Crompton talking about when he said that?…How exactly did Jimi end up with lungs full of fluid?…How did he get that way?…And what exactly was the fluid?…
JASON says: Read the testimony of Reginal Jones and John Saua who witnessed dry vomit. So then, you would call them liars and yourself one when you claimed your phony “hard plug of vomit”.
Crompton destroys your phony wine hoax and you’re too stupid to realize it. No wine was ever detected in the fluid during Teare’s forensic analysis. That destroys your phony wine scam. The fluid proves you and Fraud Bannister to be liars. There was no phony “wine removal” since Teare witnessed fluid. Bannister claimed to have sucked Hendrix dry 3 days earlier….oops!
There goes your fake wine hoax.
BUSTER says: Jason’s obvious, specious evasion avoids answering all this but it also avoids answering the fact that if Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid when he arrived at St Mary’s, and Teare noted only 400ml of fluid in one lung, then there had to be a removal of that fluid in between…That is plainly obvious from this evidence, as is Jason’s clearly uncredible denial and evasion of it…We’ve proven that Dr Bannister’s case is backed-up by the facts with this and the true record shows there was a half hour removal of Crompton’s “lungs full of fluid”…It can’t be any other way if the evidence shows Jimi went from having “lungs full of fluid” to having only 400ml of fluid in one lung…Anyone who looks at Jason’s responses will see he has failed to credibly answer this and the response he did make is obviously evasive and pathetic…By debate rules that means we win…
JASON says: LOL. This is pathetic. This joker has no documented proof of a “wine removal” so he claims “there had to be one” and then he says he “won a debate”.
Whatever floats his boat. Still the official verdict states a drug overdose and it always will since the real forensic evidence proved it in 1970. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed to the world Jimi died from a drug overdose on 9/18/70. This troll “Buster” ignores it but this destroys his phony wine hoax.
BUSTER says: Jason is also very aware that when we finally get the Hospital Report it will say exactly what we’ve been quoting…Jason is just as aware as we are that the Hospital Report will say in plain language “Treatment Time: 11:45 to 12:15″…Platt obviously accessed that report when he quoted it accurately in his book when he wrote it in 1989…That half hour treatment time corroborates Bannister and proves Siefert is lying…
JASON says: You had 10 long years to get the hospital report and you can only blow hot air making your phony claims. Another concocted fantasy story made up in your crazy head. The results have been in the books for 49 years after Dr. Thurston made it offical and it is recorded history. A drug overdose.
BUSTER says: Lastly, when David Kramer puts out his documentary we will see Siefert corroborate Bannister in plain language when he says on video “Jimi was covered in red wine”…This demented asshole Jason knows this is true but he gets his rocks off denial trolling it…When that documentary comes out then the true version of events will have all 3 doctors, Brown, Bannister, and Siefert all confirming the wine Jimi got soaked in when they forced it down his throat…
JASON says: Dr. Brown never said anything about “wine” being on or in Jimi Hendrix. Brown said Jimi died from a drug overdose. This fraud “Buster” just makes up lies in his deranged head.
You also do not have Siefert or Brown stating a “wine removal” ever happened nor do you have any documented evidence for your fake “wine removal”.
BUSTER says: May Jason be burned in hell…
JASON says: That’s where you’ll be headed for making up vicious lies of a phony “Jimi Hendrix Murder” that never happened. Say hello to Tappy “the fraud” Wright for me. You both can be reunited again.
Hi Jason, Buster the hoaxer has brought religion into it again; what a nutter. The autopsy report clearly states that there was no evidence of violence so there goes his fake waterboarding scenario. He keeps going on about the treatment time of half an hour when all it really amounted to was a few moments of hitting Jimi’s chest and waiting for Gerry Stickells so Dr. Seifert could establish time of death and complete the paperwork. Buster etc is suggesting the fluid in Jimi’s lungs was wine even though this wasn’t recorded anywhere. This wouldn’t have escaped the experienced Dr. Teare during the autopsy. Buster etc is trying to make these professionals look like inept and dishonest fools who can’t tell the difference between wine and a barbiturate overdose and who changed their stories after they were gotten to by the authorities. Dr. Thurston saw no reason to question the findings of the autopsy report by Dr. Teare, and Dr. Crompton backed Dr. Teare when he said that Jimi CLEARLY died as a result of the toxic level of the barbiturates he took.
Hi Ivana,
Buster aka Brian Doyle, the man who posts with many fake names, has a weird obsession with hell and Satan. His posts have become really deranged lately proving he has a few screws loose and his fake stories have become more absurd as he just lies about everything. He is angry cuz he was exposed as a fraud so he is irate.
All the garbage he pushes has been debunked and he still can’t decide who he wants to claim for his fake “killer”. I saw a post from him last week where he was telling you it was the FBI who he claims again. Then it’s “unknown assailants” or Monika Dannemann being a “spook”. Buster is a nut.
The funny thing is Crompton and Kathy agree with Teare’s results and it proves a lethal dose of barbiturates. Also, the fluid and vomit inside Jimi that Teare discovered proved that no wine or phony “wine removal” existed cuz Fraud Bannister was supposed to have removed 3 days earlier and this idiot Buster is too stupid to realize it.
Buster’s bogus claim that Dr. Teare didn’t analyze the fluid in Jimi or anything in him is a freaking joke since that’s the purpose of an autopsy. Then Buster claims Teare took part in a “cover up” cuz Teare’s results debunk Buster’s hoax. Buster has nothing left and can only make absurd claims in which he can never prove.
Buster suppresses the real evidence in order to push his debunked scam. He’s been doing this for 10 years and nobody takes him seriously wherever he posts and ends up getting banned.
Jason is lying when he says he already answered for Dr Crompton telling Kathy Etchingham that Jimi couldn’t be breathing when he arrived at St Mary’s because his lungs were full of fluid…All that is happening here is I correctly accused Jason of uncredibly evading giving any honest answer to Crompton’s statement and Jason responded by proving my point and once again by lying and evading giving any credible answer…When Jason self-excuses and says he’s already answered it he is lying and pathetically dodging the point once again…All Jason is doing is showing the public that a denial troll cannot and will not answer the evidence that refutes him directly or honestly…
Jason knows that as Dr Teare’s successor Crompton, as the top pathologist at the London Coroner’s Office, and his statements had serious medical, legal weight and were considered just as valuable as the original autopsy…So for Crompton to inform Kathy that Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid is tantamount to legal proof of homicide in the forensics…Jason knows his goose is cooked with this so you can see him trying to get away from it as quickly as possible in his answers…Jason lied and said there was no evidence of the wine, however when Dr Crompton confirmed the wine by admitting Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid, Jason lies and avoids it…He tries to con the readers that Crompton’s lungs full of fluid isn’t the exact description of Bannister’s lungs full of wine from a source of top credibility…
Jason is a real lying piece of shit because, while demanding strict documentation from us, he then turns around and refers to tests of the fluid in the lungs that never happened…Jason lies and says Teare never found any wine in that fluid, but the truth is Jason can’t produce any document showing that the fluid was ever tested by Teare…That’s because it wasn’t and the reason it wasn’t was because Teare was involved in a cover-up…Jason is too dumb and too dishonest to realize that once you have the top pathologist in the London Coroner’s Office confirming lungs full of fluid, while Dr Teare did not enter that in his autopsy, that it proves a cover-up and documents that Teare and even Crompton did not do what they were required to do by medical law and go back and trace forensically what that entailed…The reason they didn’t was because it was deliberately avoided as part of that cover-up…What we are seeing here is a pathological tracing of the failure of the hospital personnel to relay the critical information about the wine to the autopsy…Of course, Dr Crompton’s statement leaves open the possibility that the lungs full of fluid was relayed and then omitted by Teare as part of a cover-up…What Jason is avoiding answering here is once Crompton confirmed the lungs full of fluid he was required to forensically account for it and never did…This alone is proof of malfeasance and a cover-up that can’t be lied around like Jason so pathetically and trollishly attempts…
What we have here is Jason badly failing to answer proof for the removal of the wine at St Mary’s…Once Crompton confirmed Bannister’s lungs full of wine then it doesn’t jibe with the remnant 400ml of fluid in only one lung Teare noted…The only possibility from this is the lungs full of fluid were reduced to 400ml by the suctioning of the wine confirmed by Bannister during the half hour resuscitation attempt documented on the Hospital Report…Dr Crompton knew this from reading the reports and it is probably part of the reason why he told that to Kathy – because he knew the documentation showed it…This lowlife scum and servant of Satan Jason wants to, but can’t bring himself to, accuse Crompton and Kathy of being liars like he accuses every other witness for the wine when their proof becomes too undeniable…You can see him itching to but he knows he can’t get away with it so he refrains and resorts to some pathetically obvious self-excusing and lying…
We’ve got Jason with this, as his pathetic weaseling answers make more than clear…Jason cannot answer for the confirmed lungs full of fluid…
This debate is won by us and there is no further need to answer this un-banned lying jackass and troll Jason…
Buster’s” usual shtik shows him to be the turkey we all know him to be. This is all he can ever do since he has nothin’. Phony bluster and big talk is what this turkey is all about. When you ask him to provide real documented evidence he avoids it like the plague, and instead we get bogus claims he makes up in his crazy head he calls his “evidence”. “Buster” has worn out his con months ago which is why he is now an exposed fraud.
“Buster” in this latest post treated us to pathetic phony claims of Dr. Teare being involved in a “cover up” and not doing a forensic analysis examination on Jimi Hendrix and the contents inside him. This is “Buster’s” way of trying to get around his fake debunked hoax. “Buster” is only fooling himself since his hoax his dead.
We all know that Dr. Teare was the top pathologist in London for many years and worked on many high profile cases in his illustrious career. This lying turd “Buster” aka Brian Doyle, pathetically accuses this highly acclaimed man of being involved in a “cover up” cuz Teare’s autopsy findings debunked “Buster’s” joke of a hoax. “Buster” is a clown with no evidence of anything and this latest episode is just the same usual tactics of an exposed fraud.
Dr. Crompton in the 90’s re-examined Jimi’s autopsy report that was documented by Dr. Teare in 1970. Everything that Crompton stated in the 90’s came from Teare’s autopsy results in 1970. So, Buster trying to suggest that Crompton proved Jimi died of a “wine drowning” is a farce since Crompton confirmed Jimi died of a barbiturate overdose that was more lethal than previously thought. Crompton also studied the autopsy report and was determined to establish a time of death for Hendrix. Dr. Teare stated in his autopsy that Jimi’s lungs were both congested. Nowhere did Teare state Jimi had “lungs full of fluid” so Buster is making another bogus claim. Teare documented congested lungs and not “lungs full of fluid”. Congested lungs were only documented in Jimi’s autopsy. So, Crompton could not confirm “lungs full of fluid” since Jimi’s autopsy report that Teare wrote never stated that. Crompton never examined Jimi in 1970, he was just reading Teare’s report.
Buster the troll is fraudulently lying claiming the fluid in Jimi’s chest was wine. That is bogus cuz there was never any wine analyzed in Jimi’s body during the autopsy. The high toxic level of barbituates slowed down Jimi’s nervous system. The vomit coming out of Jimi while he was on his back made it hard for him to breathe when the pills negatively reacted. Jimi’s heart was working hard from the difficulty of breathing causing fluid to build up around his heart which Teare discovered in the autopsy and documented all these results. This is the effect of a drug overdose not a phony “wine drowning” and the autopsy results prove it.
Kathy Etchingham knows all this as well since she did the investigation and got the real information, which is why she knows Jimi was not “murdered”, and she laughs at all these bogus wine conspiracy theories from clowns like Buster. Dr. Rufus Crompton also confirmed this as well stating Jimi died from a toxic level of barbituates. Crompton never hinted at anything about wine nor did Kathy Etchingham who went to Crompton to get the results. Buster’s fake hoax is destroyed since Kathy Etchingham and Dr. Rufus Crompton refuted Buster’s fake wine hoax. Both of them said it was a lethal drug overdose and neither said anything about a phony “wine drowning” or a fake “murder”. Kathy vehemently disputes all these fake wine hoax claims and “Buster the clown” and his “murder hoax”.
Dr Teare found 400ml of fluid in Jimi’s chest along with vomit. This fluid and vomit found by Dr. Teare destroys “Buster’s” wine hoax. Fraud Bannister was supposed to have done a phony “wine removal” on Jimi 3 days earlier removing everything. Fluid and vomit should not be there if Jimi had this fake “procedure”. The fact that fluid and vomit was inside Jimi proves that Jimi never had any phony “treatments”, which is why no documentation exists of these fake “treatments” happening. Kathy Etchingham never talked about any of these fake “procedures”, and she knows they never happened, cuz she did a investigation. Kathy during her investigation, never found these fake “procedures” ever happening that this fraud Buster the troll pushes for his debunked hoax. “Buster” the wine fraud avoids this like the plague and refuses to answer it. This joker “Buster” has only his same pathetic excuse to say Dr Teare was involved in a “cover up”. We can all laugh at this turkey.
No wine was ever discovered in Jimi’s autopsy and Teare analyzed Jimi’s entire body, both the inside and outside. Teare found no evidence of Jimi being “covered in wine” during the forensic analysis examination. Teare thoroughly examined the outside of Jimi’s body looking for any signs of drug abuse. Wine would have been found on Jimi’s skin if he was “covered in wine”. No wine was found during the examination. Kathy Etchingham never spoke of the imaginary wine. That again kills this phony wine hoax pushed by this fraud Buster.
Dr. Teare examined the inside of Hendrix through forensic analysis trying to determine if drugs caused Jimi’s death which it turned out to be a toxic level of barbiturates. No hard drugs were found during the forensic analysis, and most importantly, no wine was ever found in Jimi’s lungs. Kathy Etchingham never talked about imaginary wine in Jimi’s lungs. That also kills this hoax.
All of this evidence is documented and recorded that proved Jimi died from a toxic level of barbituates and this wine clown “Buster” can only claim imaginary wine when he has no documented evidence to prove except his phony stories. That’s why for 10 years this fool can only repeat the same bullshit claims and can never prove anything. He is a joke. Kathy Etchingham disputes Buster the clown and his fake wine “murder” hoax.
Now pathetically “Buster” tries to claim “fluid means wine” and claims Fraud Bannister still found wine even after Kathy Etchingham and Jimi’s autopsy results refute Buster’s hoax. Buster makes up a fake scam of a Dr. Teare “cover up” when Kathy Etchingham and Dr. Crompton agree with Teare’s results. Then this moron goes back to his fake “procedures” by Bannister when the fluid inside Jimi proves no phony “procedures” ever happened. This wine clown debunked his own hoax. We are all falling out of our chairs laughing cuz no wine was ever found in Jimi’s autopsy report and the fluid and vomit inside Jimi Hendrix ultimately proves there never was any “wine removal procedure”. Fraud Bannister was supposed to have removed everything 3 days earlier. “Buster the wine hoaxer” can’t answer this cuz he knows this kills his hoax so he claims a phony Teare “cover up” like the clown he is.
Buster knows he has failed himself, since he knows in own mind that his hoax is destroyed, and he can never produce any documented evidence to counter any of the real evidence that refutes him. Kathy Etchingham and Dr. Rufus Crompton refutes Buster’s phony claims, as so does all the documented evidence for eternity.
Buster already cooked his Thanksgiving goose with the fluid inisde Jimi that proves no “wine removal” by Fraud Bannister ever happened.
Buster just made himself the official Thanksgiving Turkey with his dead debunked “Hendrix wine hoax murder scam”.
Great post Jason. I can’t find this full of fluid reference in any article. Dr. Crompton told Kathy about the toxic level of barbiturate present in Jimi’s liver and how he could not have survived. Kathy’s investigation backs Dr.Teare and Dr. Crompton. Eric Burdon was the first on the scene that morning and never mentioned the presence of wine in any of his autobiographies. You would think if Monika drowned Jimi in wine she would clean Jimi up to get rid of the evidence. Even the other Hendrix personnel who were there that morning at the Samarkand failed to mention seeing any wine.
Hi Ivana,
Nobody will be able to find Dr. Crompton saying “lungs full of fluid” cuz Buster made up the bogus lie himself for his hoax.
Dr. Teare performed the autopsy on Jimi Hendrix and he never documented Jimi had “lungs full of fluid”. That means Dr. Crompton never talked about “lungs full of fluid” cuz he was just reading Teare’s autopsy report. Dr. Crompton had nothing to do with the autopsy. He just read the report decades later. So, this is another bogus claim.
Dr. Teare documented that both of Jimi’s lungs were congested and 400ml of fluid in his chest. No wine was ever found through forensic analysis.
Dr. Crompton confirmed to Kathy that the barbiturates in Jimi’s body was above the toxic level. This is why she rejects all these bogus wine claims.
No wine was ever witnessed at the death scene or was ever documented in any official report. Buster only has fake stories and no proof.
Jimi Hendrix went through a full forensic analysis of both outside and inside his body. No wine was ever detected by Dr. Teare in his examination.
Buster the clown and Fraud Bannister said Jimi was “soaked and covered in wine” along with his hair.
Dr. Teare found no evidence of wine on Jimi’s body or hair during the autopsy. The wine would not disappear.
This is why this wine scam is a hoax.
Buster etc is now accusing Kathy of being a liar when she was the one who set out to investigate Jimi’s death. Could this get anymore illogical and ridiculous. Kathy has done more than anyone to keep the memory of Jimi alive, not only with the investigation into his death, but also with the English Heritage blue plaque outside the Mayfair flat she shared with Jimi. Buster is just out to win this imaginary debate for his accusations of murder and has no real concern for Jimi or any of the personnel around the morning of Jimi’s death. These people acted in a timely and professional manner as required of them by hospital protocol and their training. The delay in calling the ambulance may have contributed to Jimi’s death as much as the toxic dose of barbiturates in his system. All the doctors recognised that Jimi had been dead for a long time and this in itself did not warrant lengthy resuscitation attempts. Buster etc has now started putting words into Jason’s mouth and accusing him of following Satan. Could you get anymore nuttier, I doubt it.
Ivana,
Buster has no evidence so he attacks anybody who refutes him. He fraudulently claims Kathy is a “personal friend” but calls her a liar and accuses her of concealing evidence and not being truthful.
He claims Siefert and Teare are liars and are part of a “cover up” cuz they both refute his hoax. Crompton agrees with both of them and I remember Buster was attacking Crompton back in August.
This hoaxing clown Buster is not interested in real evidence or doesn’t even know about Jimi’s music or anything about him other this conspiracy garbage. This fool just wants to “debate” his fake murder claim and he changes his fake stories each time he posts so he can claim he “won a debate”. He is a fraud. His cheap character attacks and posting with fake names to attack us proves just that. He makes up many fake accounts for trolling on sites he posted and was banned from.
I thank Jason for further winning this debate for me with his trash-talk trolling being used to cover-up the fact he can’t come up with the documentation he demands of us but can’t produce himself…All Jason is telling us there is he can’t produce Teare’s test of the lung fluid because he never did any…So Jason is lying when he says the lung fluid contained no wine…And through that lie he avoids answering how Jimi could go from lungs full of fluid to one lung with 400ml of fluid with no wine removal in between?…
The more Jason trash-talk trolls while avoiding giving any answer to what exactly Dr Crompton was referring to when he referenced “lungs full of fluid” the more he makes our point for us…Credible investigation looks at all the evidence and seeks-out incriminating facts…Jason’s approach is that of a cheating weaseling defense lawyer who is seeking all the excuses while publicly evading the real evidence…We’ve more than made our case that there were serious flaws in the investigation of Jimi’s death…So serious that they couldn’t be unintentional and obviously constitute a cover-up…
Where we are with this “debate” is Jason is obviously struggling to answer the clear reference to “lungs full of fluid” Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham Jimi had…This is confirming evidence of Dr Bannister and refutes Jason and he knows it…When asked to account for it he goes in to one of his classic trolling deliveries of blather designed to never answer the point…All Jason is doing here is telling us he can’t directly or honestly answer why Dr Crompton would tell Kathy that and what exactly made him say it?…Where did Crompton get that from?…
Despite Jason’s trying to lie around this evidence with false references to drug overdoses that I already proved were forensically impossible, he never gives any adequate answer to why Dr Crompton would confirm Jimi was drowned in fluid?…The reason Jason is having trouble answering this, and his excuses fall short, is because the lungs full of fluid Dr Crompton mentioned were obviously Dr Bannister’s lungs full of wine…
If you look at Jason’s troll screed above he never makes any attempt to answer for Dr Siefert’s claimed red wine that was covering Jimi…When Jason draws you in to his trolling sidewalk con man shell game he hopes you don’t notice that he palmed the “Siefert said Jimi was covered in red wine” ball…Common sense tells you if Dr’s Brown, Siefert, and Bannister all described Jimi being covered in red wine then that had to be wine that spilled over when Jimi was being drowned with it…That has to be because the forensics that lying Jason is deliberately, trollishly ignoring prove that Jimi had only a trace blood alcohol amount so it could not have been any wine he drank…
Jason is trying to avoid discussing that Jimi was well familiar with drugs and would not take a strong dose of sleeping pills and then chug wine and spill it all over himself…Personal accounts of Jimi said he was a neatness freak so he would not have slobbed wine all over himself that had no forensic tracing of being drank voluntarily…Jason also flagrantly denies Monika’s admission that she poured wine on Jimi…Jason uses his usual primitive cop-out of saying Sharon Lawrence is a liar in his mendacious avoidance of Monika’s admission…However the wine Monika said she poured on Jimi is still in play…It is pretty clear that Jason is the liar here and not Sharon Lawrence so there’s no reason why we should not stress the wine Monika said she poured on Jimi just because Jason is lying to avoid it…Obviously that wine was not poured on Jimi while he was conscious…Which means the wine came in to play when Jimi was unconscious and there is our simple circumstantial forensic evidence of murder that Jason can only answer with moronic accusations of lying…
I thank Jason because any level-headed person of average intelligence could see his last post is obviously a mentally unstable person trying to convince himself his bullshit is true against the obvious facts that he’s going out of his way to deny…We’ve won this debate because anyone who reads Jason’s trolling will see he failed badly to account for Dr Crompton’s lungs full of fluid that can only be one thing…Nor did he make any effort to honestly answer Siefert’s admission that Jimi was covered in red wine…Oh yeah – Jason also avoids the evidence for the half hour resuscitation attempt that was clearly indicated on the Hospital Report…
“Buster” is a clown who thinks he won a “debate” in his own mind. He is a debunked fraud.
“Buster” has no evidence for his phony claims that he makes up. He only has fake stories and no real documents.
A pathologist analyzes everything in a body for an autopsy and no wine was ever found anywhere on Jimi Hendrix. Buster has nothing to prove for his imaginary wine.
No fake “wine removal” ever happened. No report ever exists and the fluid and vomit inside Jimi Hendrix at the autopsy proves there was no phony “wine removal”.
Dr. Crompton never talked about “lungs full of fluid” cuz Dr. Teare never found “lungs full of fluid” in Jimi’s autopsy. Dr. Crompton was reading Teare’s autopsy report so no “lungs full of fluid” was ever documented. Buster can’t produce evidence of “lungs full of fluid”.
Dr. Crompton confirmed Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates and Kathy Etchingham was told this and it was documented.
Dr. Crompton never even talked about this fake “wine removal”. This never happened.
Dr. Bob Brown never said one word about Jimi being “covered in wine” and Buster can’t produce evidence of Dr. Brown saying it. Buster is a lying fraud.
We get more of the same fake stories of wine from Buster but he still has no evidence to prove of his fake wine. 10 years he has been telling phony tales and can’t post any evidence of wine.
We all can read Buster’s projection who makes up fake stories so he can claim wine. That’s what a mentally ill person does.
Buster needs to convince himself of fake wine and phony procedures with his own fake stories. Pathetic.
No St. Mary Abbots Hospital report exists of fake wine, wine removal, or procedures. St. Mary Abbots Hospital stated to the public that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose on 9/18/70. This is documented evidence.
Both Dr. Teare and Dr. Thurston confirmed through forensic analysis of Jimi’s body that Jimi Hendrix died of a barbiturate overdose. This is documented evidence.
Dr. Crompton re-examined Jimi’s autopsy report in the 90’s and confirmed what Teare had documented. Crompton concluded that the barbiturate level in Jimi Hendrix was above the toxic level and it killed him. Not one word of fake wine was ever spoken. This is documented evidence and Buster has no documented evidence for his phony wine stories.
That is a trifecta with confirmation and documentation that proves Jimi died from a drug overdose. Buster the clown has nothing but fake stories that he makes up in his crazy head. His hoax is done like a well done turkey.
Hi Jason. We know Buster is really good at deception just by the fact he used all those fake names to hide his true identity and to keep continuing to spin a hoax.
Hi Ivana,
You are absolutely correct. There’s no reason for “Buster” to have all those fake names. He uses fake names on here too. He uses fake names to troll and push his hoax on the internet. He does this on several sites which is why he was banned. Buster is just a fake story teller and he’s doing it for 10 years.
BUSTER says: Jason is trying to avoid discussing that Jimi was well familiar with drugs and would not take a strong dose of sleeping pills and then chug wine and spill it all over himself.
BUSTER says: Jason also flagrantly denies Monika’s admission that she poured wine on Jimi…Jason uses his usual primitive cop-out of saying Sharon Lawrence is a liar in his mendacious avoidance of Monika’s admission…However the wine Monika said she poured on Jimi is still in play…It is pretty clear that Jason is the liar here and not Sharon Lawrence so there’s no reason why we should not stress the wine Monika said she poured on Jimi just because Jason is lying to avoid it…Obviously that wine was not poured on Jimi while he was conscious…Which means the wine came in to play when Jimi was unconscious and there is our simple circumstantial forensic evidence of murder that Jason can only answer with moronic accusations of lying…
JASON says: Buster just told us that Sharon Lawrence is not a liar. Sharon Lawrence wrote in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide based on numerology of the number 9 cuz Jimi was obsessed with the occult and the number 9. Sharon Lawrence wrote Jimi Hendrix killed himself on purpose by taking 9 pills being obesssed with the number 9. So that means Buster then agrees with what Sharon Lawrence wrote in her fiction book about Jimi committing suicide cuz Buster says Sharon Lawrence is not a liar.
But then Buster debunks his first claim above, when he said “Jimi would not take a strong dose of sleeping pills”, but Sharon Lawrence said in her book that Jimi did take a strong dose of sleeping pills to kill himself based on the number 9 and the occult. So, Buster does believe in Sharon Lawrence’s lies and the fiction she writes in her bogus books and debunks himself in his first statement. Buster is just a total contradiction having no clue what he wants to claim.
Jason obviously thinks he’s getting away with the cheap tactics a defense lawyer would use when he knows his client is guilty…Does he really believe that people can’t see him desperately trying to discredit and defame Sharon Lawrence because he knows he can’t directly answer what Sharon witnessed?…
Over on Crosstown Torrents the trolls there also concentrated on denying the wine because they knew if they could get rid of the wine that it would be the shortest route to denying the murder…It is kind of apparent that Jason is also using that same tactic, which is why he expends his cheapest most primitive denial tools towards all the witnesses of the wine…
Once again, Jason uses his usual tactic of changing the subject to get out of answering something he knows refutes him…We are not talking about Sharon’s uncredible claim that Jimi committed Russian roulette suicide by means of the number 9 pills…We are talking about Sharon’s direct witnessing of her confrontation of Monika about the wine in a telephone call…In that call Sharon was the first person to ever directly confront Monika about the wine Dr Bannister had made public and Sharon had obviously gotten wind of…It was a completely unexpected shock to Monika who had an extreme reaction to the question that couldn’t be faked…That reaction is what Jason is deliberately ignoring with his defamation-baiting…
Like the crude troll he is, Jason evades honestly evaluating Sharon’s witnessing with a blanket accusation of lying…Jason uses that overly-simple technique because he’s trying to escape answering for the finer details of Sharon’s witnessing…What Sharon recorded in those details was Monika having a dire reaction to finally being confronted about the wine…Monika moaned in to the phone for 20 seconds and then came up with the quick excuse that she washed sick off Jimi’s face with wine…Only the problem was there was no vomit washed off Jimi’s face when the ambulance men got there…Monika was lying because she knew she got caught over the wine she knew was used to murder Jimi…
For Jason’s crude denials and accusations of lying to be true would require Sharon to concoct a well detailed lie in her description of Monika’s painful reaction to being asked about the wine…The wine obviously had painful significance to Monika or she wouldn’t have reacted that way…What Jason is ignoring and hoping he fools people over is the fact people don’t do painful moaning reactions to wine that doesn’t exist or doesn’t keep showing up in the witnessing…
Where Jason loses is out in the common sense world of reality where a jury would evaluate his input and ask themselves if the obvious excuse of Sharon’s wrong claim of magic number 9 suicide is adequate replacement for the direct evidence of Sharon’s confronting Monika about the wine?…Is it believable that Sharon completely fabricated that story with so much incriminating detail?…They would ask themselves why Jason spends so much effort trying to discredit Sharon and what he was trying to hide by doing that?…
So the evidence once again goes unanswered by Jason of how could Jimi be soaked in wine after he lost consciousness and what does that tell you evidence-wise?…Why are people pouring wine on Jimi instead of saving him?…The answer is quite simple, as is the obviousness of Jason’s avoidance of it…The wine Monika confirmed to Sharon Lawrence, that matched the wine repeatedly witnessed elsewhere, was wine that spilled over as it was being forced down Jimi’s throat at the Samarkand…Monika moaned in reaction because she knew she had finally been brought to “that place” that she had successfully avoided with the aid of the criminal British government for so many years…If we were to criticize Sharon Lawrence it would be for not playing it smart and pretending she was Monika’s friend…If Sharon were really a friend of Jimi’s she would have sympathized with Monika and invited her to California where she could have asked Monika more questions about what happened and drew her in deeper…That way Sharon could have confronted Monika with the fact the ambulance men witnessed a Jimi with no vomit washed off his face and recorded her answer…
Jason is too dumb and too full of trolling mania to realize he looks like a nit-picking nut in front of a master who is crushing him…
Buster,
What would make Sharon Lawrence write in her book that Jimi committed suicide by taking 9 pills cuz he was obsessed with the number 9 and the occult? Surely Sharon had to get her information from somewhere to print in her book since you claim she is not a liar and is credible. Any answer?
Hi Jason. If Sharon Lawrence questioned Monika about the presence of wine and believed this is to be evidence then she would not have written about Jimi committing suicide with nine sleeping pills because of his obsession with the number 9. Buster is falling over his own footsteps time and time again like a child starting to walk. Sharon met Monika in Eric Burdon’s Hotel room shortly after Jimi’s death and took an immediate dislike towards her because Monika was more interested in discussing her paintings than talking about the death of Jimi Hendrix. Sharon was put off by Monika’s demeanour more than anything. Monika did say however that Jimi took a large amount of her pills and no time was wine mentioned on this particular occasion. This wine story came into play years later and was absent from any earlier books. Buster etc needs to let go of mentioning the other sites that banned him as just another excuse to make himself look credible and trustworthy; he is just about self promotion and continuing with his hoax.
Hi Ivana,
Buster has no answer for Sharon Lawrence and her Jimi Hendrix 9 pill suicide occult claim in her fiction book. This makes all her and Buster’s phony wine claims irrelevant since Jimi already killed himself with pills. The imaginary wine is pointless since Jimi was already dead by suicide according to Sharon. They can’t claim both a Jimi Hendrix suicide and then a Jimi Hendrix wine murder. That doesn’t work. Buster is in a quandary.
This is just more proof that Sharon Lawrence is a liar and this is the woman who Buster gets the bulk of his phony information from.
Buster claims Sharon Lawrence is not a liar but she lied about Jimi committing suicide and being obsessed with the occult.
Sharon Lawrence will write anything for money and Buster is just a sucker who bought into her fiction and parrots her lies.
This hoax is a joke and it’s always one sourced claims with no other real verification.
I have some postings you will find very interesting in a few days.
Jason is lying once again like he does in every response…I have shown evidence of the wine because we have a documented half hour on the Hospital Report that Jason ignores and tries to lie around by saying it doesn’t exist…We also have the top pathologist at the London Coroner’s Office referring to it when he told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid when he arrived at St Mary’s…Jason finally made his only desperate move above and called Dr Crompton and Kathy liars, saying Dr Crompton never told Kathy that…However the reference to Crompton saying that was already provided to Jason…It is in chapter 11 of Kathy’s book…You see the reason Jason feels free to contemptuously deny Crompton’s saying that is because he never knew anything about this subject before he decided to troll this comments section, so being the ignorant trolling asshole he is, Jason isn’t aware of Kathy’s book because he never read it…His trolling in this comments section is based on him finding out about it for the first time when he started posting (as can be seen in his posts where he is learning about it for the first time as he goes)…He hasn’t found Kathy’s citation in his internet searches so he projects his ignorance on to others and pretends his knowledge is the going standard…However in the real world, if we could place Jason next to Kathy and have him tell Kathy that she was lying and Crompton never said that, we would quickly see who was lying and who was credible…There’s a real advantage to being an internet troll like Jason…You never have to account for any of your trolling on a reality basis…The half hour on the Hospital Report that backs Bannister is the reality and is evidence…Jason’s lies are the non-reality and are just goofy internet trolling coming from a sick mind…Dr Crompton telling Kathy Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid is the reality and is evidence…Jason’s lying and saying Crompton never said that is the non-reality and is just Jason’s sick infantile denial trolling…
Jason is using his dishonest word tricks to switch the subject every time he gets caught by the evidence…Above he writes, “Teare never found lungs full of fluid in the autopsy”…Jason knows he is lying so he sets up a dishonest strawman instead of answering what was actually said…No one ever said Teare found lungs full of fluid in the autopsy…It is obvious to any intelligent reader that the only reason Jason is diverting to that false strawman is because he knows he can’t answer what was said honestly or directly…The question Jason is deliberately avoiding and therefore showing the public his guilt, is why would Dr Crompton tell Kathy that Jimi’s lungs were drowned in fluid?…Obviously when Crompton told that to Kathy in 1991 he had some reason to say it…If we use Jason’s own words above he says that pathologists note every aspect of the patient’s condition in their autopsies…Well, yes that is correct and there is Crompton doing exactly that when he tells Kathy that Jimi could not have been breathing upon arrival at St Mary’s because his lungs were full of fluid…
After Jason is done with his lies he still hasn’t answered the necessary questions his own level of demands require…He still hasn’t answered what made Crompton tell Kathy Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid if it wasn’t written on the autopsy report?…Crompton was a seasoned pro and knew better than to say such a thing without anything to back it up as the top pathologist in England at the time…So Crompton obviously learned it from somewhere…It is very obvious that in his inquiry in to Teare’s autopsy Crompton learned from somewhere that Jimi had a half hour treatment time and resuscitation attempt where 5 bottles of wine were removed from his lungs and stomach…Jason can’t get around the fact that Crompton vindicated Bannister when he confirmed to Etchingham that Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…It is silly that Jason would even try because he is finished by this and he knows it…
Kathy was learning as she was going so when she confronted Crompton she didn’t have the knowledge and where-with-all to ask Crompton immediately where he got that from and why he said it…I tried to contact Dr Crompton a few years ago by telephone but got no response to my voice messages…Obviously, in his review of Teare’s autopsy of Jimi, Crompton was one of the few professionals who actually did what they were supposed to do and diligently looked-in to the details of what happened…Someone he spoke to told him of Jimi being drowned in wine and he repeated it to Kathy…You see, because Crompton was the professional Jason cites, he said “fluid” because he had no proof of any wine in the autopsy…But what Jason is avoiding in his trolling is he can’t account for any fluid, let alone wine…This is resounding proof because Crompton told this to Kathy in 1991, before Bannister had written his letter to Shapiro…Which means it is a second corroborating witness to the wine outside of Bannister…
Jason switches the subject to Dr Brown never saying Jimi was covered in red wine…The reason Brown never said that was because he just walked along side the gurney as it was rolled in but didn’t have the hands-on contact Siefert and Bannister did…Dr Brown saying he detected Jimi had too much to drink is exactly what you would expect from a person who had the level of contact Brown did…Siefert and Bannister said Jimi was soaked in wine because they had more hands-on contact…So once again, Jason dishonestly stresses semantics in order to avoid evidence he clearly can’t answer…Any fool would realize Brown detected the same wine Siefert and Bannister did…By employing this strawman Jason is avoiding answering for the fact Siefert resoundingly confirmed the wine by saying Jimi was covered in it – which completely destroys Jason’s case…
Where Jason fails is in the final judgement of his input…Jason operates by means of trolling self-approval and being the judge of his own material…But most of what Jason gets away with would be rejected by any credible jury…Jason continues to get away with his trolling denial of good evidence because there is nothing here to hold him accountable to the lies and deception he practices…Any objective evaluation of Jason’s input would see he is just an annoying nay-sayer troll who is obnoxiously seeking anything he can think of to deny our evidence…It’s not like people can’t see it so as soon as Jason and his input were brought under the scrutiny of credible accountability he would quickly be dismissed as the idiotic, uncredible troll he is…Where he loses is he violates the rules of evidence and you can’t fool people with that…Jason lies and takes quotes out of context in his desperate denial of the evidence…That jury would see that Jason’s misquoting of the false claims that Jimi died of an overdose would be overturned by the fact drowning takes medical precedence to overdose, especially when compared to the real timeline Jason moronically ignores…So Jason violates not only the rules of evidence in public but the rules of medical science as well and he just can’t get around it no matter how much he lies and trolls…Plus that same jury would see that Crompton obviously told that to Kathy and Jason’s denial of it isn’t credible…
It’s why we won this a long time ago and Jason is just digging his troll’s grave deeper…
Here’s another fantasy commentary from Buster, but as usual, no documented evidence.
Buster tells us his fantasy scenario of what he wants to believe but nothing about what he writes is factual.
Buster wants to claim “fluid is wine” but no wine was ever forensically analyzed during the autopsy anywhere on Jimi Hendrix’s body inside or out.
Buster wants to claim Jimi was “soaked in wine”. Dr. Teare found no wine on Jimi’s body or hair.
Buster wants to claim Jimi had “lungs full of wine”. Dr. Teare found no wine in Jimi’s lungs.
Dr. Teare found Jimi’s lungs were congested and discovered vomit.
If Fraud Bannister performed a “wine removal” there would be no vomit still inside Jimi. The fact the vomit was there proves there was no phony “wine removal”.
During an autopsy the entire body is analyzed looking for the cause of death.
Buster has no answer for why no wine was detected anywhere on Jimi Hendrix.
If Hendrix was soaked in gallons of wine and flooded inside with wine, it would have been detected during the autopsy.
Buster, why would Dr. Teare find no wine inside Jimi or on his hair or skin during forensic analysis?
You can’t nay say claiming foresnsic analysis did not happen cuz.a dead body in an autopsy is always forensically analyzed to determine the cause of death.
You can’t claim the reason was Fraud Bannister removed the wine 3 days earlier cuz analysis of Jimi’s lungs would detect wine.
You have no answer for why Dr. Teare did not detect wine on Jimi’s body when you claim he was soaked in it. All the wine would still be left on Jimi’s skin.
Buster is cooked like a well done Thanksgiving Turkey.
More shallow trolling from a sick person…The reason Jason didn’t quote the passages in my last post is because he knew they were condemning and didn’t want to advertise them…
After being accused of trolling by means of semantics and deceptive wording Jason once again returns and trolls by semantics and deceptive wording…We asked Jason to practice what he preaches and show us any forensic analysis of the fluid in Jimi’s lungs at the autopsy…Jason couldn’t do it…That’s because there wasn’t any and Jason is lying when he says the autopsy found no wine in the 400ml of fluid it recorded…In the meantime, the reality Jason is obviously desperately evading in his posts dictates that the 400ml of fluid Teare recorded in Jimi’s lung had to have contained some wine since 5 bottles worth had been removed at St Mary’s…
Jason once again publicly tries to duck-in to the safety of his dishonest strawmen to get out of answering direct evidence…But the only reason he is doing that, and trying to divert the discussion, is because he can’t answer what exactly was the lungs full of fluid Crompton told to Kathy Etchingham?…Forget wine, what “fluid” could possibly be flooding Jimi’s lungs to the point that it would prevent breathing?…Jason is a dishonest web-spinner and strawman-maker who, as soon as you ask him to answer a direct point, goes right in to his routine of constructing false arguments instead of answering what you said…Jason was confronted to answer what exactly was Crompton referring to when he told Kathy of that drowning “fluid”?…Any objective intelligent person can see Jason making efforts to spin-up diverting non-answers to that…What that tells you is Jason knows he can’t answer it so he avoids it with false strawmen…After he’s done answering he still hasn’t answered the point…It was Jason himself who demanded that pathologists meticulously record all details in an autopsy…Well, there’s Crompton doing that with the lungs full of fluid – only in this instance it completely corroborates us and our claim…Jason doesn’t like that, so he trolls it and switches the subject to specious evasions…That imaginary jury I am talking about would nail Jason for his refusal to answer for the fluid…They would agree it was a pure sign that Jason knows it was Bannister’s wine and that Crompton had corroborated it to Kathy…That’s why Jason can’t answer it in public without resorting to his usual logically-fallacious bullshit…
As usual Jason enters idiocy when he claims that no vomit would be found in Jimi’s lungs if Bannister had done a suctioning resuscitation…The vomit recorded in the small bronchi by Teare is the remnant vomit that would have penetrated to that degree and not been removed by Bannister’s resuscitation…So Jason once again enters a scientific moronacy with no accountability…
The reason Jason would have been kicked-out of a credibly-moderated debate long ago is because he insisted that only documented evidence could be used…However, even though he was told that there was no analysis of the lung fluid, he keeps ignoring it and telling us that no wine was detected in that fluid…That right there would tell a jury or moderator that Jason is a nut and loses by his own words that he isn’t afraid to violate in public…It would tell sensible people that Jason is trolling and trolls should be unceremoniously booted…
The reason Teare found no wine was because he wasn’t looking for any…Jeffery was a member of MI-6 and since Britain has no Constitution it was actually quite legal for them to corrupt the autopsy under covert national security orders…We have evidence of that corruption in the fact Crompton witnessed the lungs full of wine to Kathy and Thurston witnessed the stomach full of wine to Meehan…Despite Jason’s idiotic lies, that IS evidence of the wine whether he agrees with it or not…And since those medical authorities were legally, morally, and medically responsible to follow it through forensically but didn’t, that is proof of a cover-up…There’s no sensible person of average intelligence who couldn’t see Jason avoiding this and answering it with shallow deflections, false arguments, and evasions…
Jason is so full of dishonest trolling that he probably doesn’t realize he is proving our case indirectly by showing an example of how the medical evidence was avoided…Jason’s own example of focusing on a false assumption of overdose is exactly what the medical authorities did back then…When they combined this with the deliberately promoted assumption of suicide they successfully avoided the real evidence just like Jason is doing here…Jason is so full of dishonest intent and so blinded by his lies that he doesn’t register that his own example is good proof of how they did it back then at the time…In the meantime there is no person with an IQ above room temperature who wouldn’t ask why the medical authorities didn’t pursue the evidence of the wine that kept showing up?…Jason begs credulity by asking us to suspend disbelief over those authorities not interviewing the nurses or not following-through on Crompton’s or Thurston’s claims…
If you look at Jason’s ballsy evasions above he once again answers to his own strawmen instead of honestly answering what was said…Jason never answered the fact that once Crompton told Kathy Jimi was drowned in fluid he confirmed that Jimi did not overdose…Medically, drowning takes precedence to overdose and Jason fails the rules of science and law by not giving any honest answer to this…What is happening here is if you evaluate Jason’s material on a point by point basis he is badly losing because his arguments fail by any objective standard when analyzed by merit…Jason has failed to answer the correct facts and by doing that has lost…
No honest person would argue that Crompton did not say that to Kathy…Or deny what it clearly indicated…
Buster returns to his same playbook of lies, evasion, hot air, claiming a phony “cover up” by dragging in Jeffery again, and claiming a forensic analysis of Jimi’s body didn’t happen (when that was the whole purpose of the autopsy) cuz this all refutes his fake hoax. Nothing that Buster wrote here is useful, just more phony tales and no documented evidence.
Buster dances around the major issue like a ballerina and refuses to post his wine evidence for us. Buster claims Crompton backs his wine claim, but Buster won’t post a statement from Dr. Crompton stating Jimi had “lungs full of wine”.
Buster is a troll who has no evidence and just peddles phony stories of imaginary wine for the last 10 years. Buster seriously needs a new hobby. This one has failed.
BUSTER says: More shallow trolling from a sick person…The reason Jason didn’t quote the passages in my last post is because he knew they were condemning and didn’t want to advertise them…
JASON says: LOL. You have no evidence of what you’e claiming. You’re the troll who cherry picks which phony claims of Sharon Lawrence and Monika Dannemann that fits your phony narrative.
BUSTER says: After being accused of trolling by means of semantics and deceptive wording Jason once again returns and trolls by semantics and deceptive wording…We asked Jason to practice what he preaches and show us any forensic analysis of the fluid in Jimi’s lungs at the autopsy…Jason couldn’t do it…That’s because there wasn’t any and Jason is lying when he says the autopsy found no wine in the 400ml of fluid it recorded…In the meantime, the reality Jason is obviously desperately evading in his posts dictates that the 400ml of fluid Teare recorded in Jimi’s lung had to have contained some wine since 5 bottles worth had been removed at St Mary’s…
JASON says: LOL. Buster claims the 400ml of fluid in Jimi’s chest “had to have contained wine” but then he says no forensic analysis was performed by Dr. Teare. Beautiful contradiction! Buster is a troll and is easily defeated each and every time with his nonsense.
There is no documentation of the fluid containing any wine inside Jimi Hendrix. All fluids in a body goes under forensic analysis during an autopsy. Call up any pathologist or coroner in the world. Buster is debunked with his pathetic nay saying and lame dismissals of how pathologists and corners always operate.
Buster only pathetic claim is to say “no forensic analysis of Jimi’s body didn’t happen” when every single body that undergoes an autopsy is put through forensic analysis to determine the cause of death.
Buster’s trolling antics is to claim “it didn’t happen ” cuz he knows his hoax is dead.
Buster expects us to believe that Dr. Teare would just look at Jimi’s dead body and do nothing else to determine the cause of death Very weak and pathetic trolling.
Buster has no real answer for how he can claim the outside Jimi’s body was soaked in wine and it wasn’t detected by Dr. Teare.
Buster has no real answer for how he can claim the inside of Jimi’s body was “drowned in wine” but no wine was ever detected.
If Fraud Bannister removed “5 bottles of wine” as Buster claims, Teare would have done analysis on the wine and Hendrix’s lungs to determine “wine”.
No wine was ever detected anywhere on Jimi.
This wine hoax is done like a well done Turkey.
BUSTER says: Jason once again publicly tries to duck-in to the safety of his dishonest strawmen to get out of answering direct evidence…But the only reason he is doing that, and trying to divert the discussion, is because he can’t answer what exactly was the lungs full of fluid Crompton told to Kathy Etchingham?…Forget wine, what “fluid” could possibly be flooding Jimi’s lungs to the point that it would prevent breathing?…
JASON says: Dr. Teare never documented that Jimi had “lungs full of fluid”. He said there was fluid in Jimi’s chest and his lungs wee congested. Crompton was reading Teare’s report.
No, we are not going to forget “wine” since Buster is claiming Hendrix has lungs full of wine.
Again, Buster does a Turkey Trot and dances away from a major conflicting issue for him.
Buster claims Jimi had “lungs full of wine” so Buster needs to pony up and post some documented evidence for his claim.
Buster, post a statement from Dr. Crompton stating that Jimi Hendrix had “lungs full of wine” or was “drowned in wine”
BUSTER says: Jason is a dishonest web-spinner and strawman-maker who, as soon as you ask him to answer a direct point, goes right in to his routine of constructing false arguments instead of answering what you said…
JASON says: No false argument here at all. Your argument is that Jimi Hendrix had “lungs full of wine”.
So, post a statement from Dr. Crompton stating Jimi had “lungs full of wine”.
Your troll game is to play word games trying to claim “fluid means wine” and you said there was wine in the fluid. So post documented evidence of it.
You said Crompton backs your claim and Bannister’s, so post a statement from Dr. Crompton stating Jimi had “lungs full of wine”.
BUSTER says: Jason was confronted to answer what exactly was Crompton referring to when he told Kathy of that drowning “fluid”?…Any objective intelligent person can see Jason making efforts to spin-up diverting non-answers to that…What that tells you is Jason knows he can’t answer it so he avoids it with false strawmen…After he’s done answering he still hasn’t answered the point…It was Jason himself who demanded that pathologists meticulously record all details in an autopsy…Well, there’s Crompton doing that with the lungs full of fluid – only in this instance it completely corroborates us and our claim…Jason doesn’t like that, so he trolls it and switches the subject to specious evasions…That imaginary jury I am talking about would nail Jason for his refusal to answer for the fluid…They would agree it was a pure sign that Jason knows it was Bannister’s wine and that Crompton had corroborated it to Kathy…That’s why Jason can’t answer it in public without resorting to his usual logically-fallacious bullshit…
JASON says: Lots of long winded flowery prose here but no evidence of your “lungs full of wine”.
Either shit or get off the pot. Post your evidence for what you are claiming. It shouldn’t be this difficult since you already claimed “victory” and you said Crompton backs you.
Post a statement from Dr. Crompton stating Jimi had “lungs full of wine”.
BUSTER says: As usual Jason enters idiocy when he claims that no vomit would be found in Jimi’s lungs if Bannister had done a suctioning resuscitation…The vomit recorded in the small bronchi by Teare is the remnant vomit that would have penetrated to that degree and not been removed by Bannister’s resuscitation…So Jason once again enters a scientific moronacy with no accountability…
JASON says: False and more trolling. Jimi was suctioned out as you claim, and nothing would be left behind. Also none of the tissues inside Jimi ever detected mass amounts of wine.
BUSTER says: The reason Jason would have been kicked-out of a credibly-moderated debate long ago is because he insisted that only documented evidence could be used…However, even though he was told that there was no analysis of the lung fluid, he keeps ignoring it and telling us that no wine was detected in that fluid…That right there would tell a jury or moderator that Jason is a nut and loses by his own words that he isn’t afraid to violate in public…It would tell sensible people that Jason is trolling and trolls should be unceremoniously booted…
JASON says I keep asking you to post evidence of wine in the fluid that you claim and you refuse. You are trolling and evading what is asked of you.
Jimi went through a full body forensic analysis and no wine was ever detected anywhere on him. Buster is the troll who makes up fake stories of wine with zero evidence and only hot air and bluster for 10 years.
BUSTER says: The reason Teare found no wine was because he wasn’t looking for any
JASON says: LMAO bullshit! You are the biggest lying troll ever dude. I said this was going to be your bogus excuse.
Fraud Bannister claimed he removed 5 bottles of wine. By law, he is required to pass on that information to Dr. Teare for analysis.
Also, it doesn’t matter whether or not Dr. Teare was looking for wine or not. An autopsy is an exploratory examination, that is why everything is analyzed inside and outside a body to determine the cause of death.
Let me refer you to this official statement by St. Marty Abbots Hospital:
“We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”
The hospital confirmed that Jimi died from an overdose but didn’t know why or how he died. The purpose of Dr. Teare’s examination was to find out how and why he died. Teare did a full body analysis of Jimi Hendrix to determine how and why he died. No wine was found anywhere on Jimi’s body during analysis. If Jimi was “covered in wine” and “drowned in wine” it would have been detected. No wine was found on Hendrix and no wine was ever documented.
As the lady at Marathon Car Rental on “Planes Trains, and Automobile says: “You’re fucked.”
BUSTER says:…Jeffery was a member of MI-6 and since Britain has no Constitution it was actually quite legal for them to corrupt the autopsy under covert national security orders…We have evidence of that corruption in the fact Crompton witnessed the lungs full of wine to Kathy and Thurston witnessed the stomach full of wine to Meehan…Despite Jason’s idiotic lies, that IS evidence of the wine whether he agrees with it or not…And since those medical authorities were legally, morally, and medically responsible to follow it through forensically but didn’t, that is proof of a cover-up…There’s no sensible person of average intelligence who couldn’t see Jason avoiding this and answering it with shallow deflections, false arguments, and evasions…
JASON says: Ah, the phony “cover up” claim again with horeshit claims from a troll with zero evidence. Sharon Lawrence confirmed Jimi committed suicide so there was no wine in his stomach when he was already dead from pills. Nice try!
BUSTER says: Jason is so full of dishonest trolling that he probably doesn’t realize he is proving our case indirectly by showing an example of how the medical evidence was avoided…Jason’s own example of focusing on a false assumption of overdose is exactly what the medical authorities did back then…When they combined this with the deliberately promoted assumption of suicide they successfully avoided the real evidence just like Jason is doing here…Jason is so full of dishonest intent and so blinded by his lies that he doesn’t register that his own example is good proof of how they did it back then at the time…In the meantime there is no person with an IQ above room temperature who wouldn’t ask why the medical authorities didn’t pursue the evidence of the wine that kept showing up?…Jason begs credulity by asking us to suspend disbelief over those authorities not interviewing the nurses or not following-through on Crompton’s or Thurston’s claims…
JASON says: Thurston never made any claim. Sharon Lawrence wrote that fake Thurston quote in her fiction book but she says Jimi committed suicide so this claim of her’s is invalid.
More trolling, hot air, and evasion from Buster who can’t answer for his phony wine claims.
Post a statement fro Crompton citing wine. it shouldn’t be this hard.
BUSTER says: If you look at Jason’s ballsy evasions above he once again answers to his own strawmen instead of honestly answering what was said…Jason never answered the fact that once Crompton told Kathy Jimi was drowned in fluid he confirmed that Jimi did not overdose…Medically, drowning takes precedence to overdose and Jason fails the rules of science and law by not giving any honest answer to this…What is happening here is if you evaluate Jason’s material on a point by point basis he is badly losing because his arguments fail by any objective standard when analyzed by merit…Jason has failed to answer the correct facts and by doing that has lost…
JASON says: You have lost easily Buster. You are claiming Jimi had “lungs full of wine” and the “fluid was wine” but you can’t post a statement from Dr. Crompton confirming your bogus claim.
BUSTER says: No honest person would argue that Crompton did not say that to Kathy…Or deny what it clearly indicated…
JASON says: No honest person would troll and make up bogus lies like you do for a phony debunked theory for 10 years.
Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that the barbiturates in Jimi Hendrix was above he toxic level which killed him. Kathy has wrote and confirmed this. She laughs at you and your fake “murder” hoax and your bullshit cover up claim that you use to weasel out of the fact all the evidence refutes you.
Stick a fork in your turkey…Gobble Gobble…you’re done!
BUSTER says: Jason is trying to avoid discussing that Jimi was well familiar with drugs and would not take a strong dose of sleeping pills and then chug wine and spill it all over himself.
JASON says: Sharon Lawrence said Jimi took a strong dose of sleeping pills to kill himself. Your hero Sharon Lawrence wrote that in her fiction book. This is the woman you get the bulk of your information from to peddle your hoax.
Sharon Lawrence wrote in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix took 9 pills to kill himself cuz Jimi was obsessed with the number 9 and the occult. Buster, do you believe your hero Sharon Lawrence? Are you going to call Sharon Lawrence a liar for writing bogus stories of Jimi committing suicide and being in the occult in her fiction book?
BUSTER says: Jason uses that overly-simple technique because he’s trying to escape answering for the finer details of Sharon’s witnessing…What Sharon recorded in those details was Monika having a dire reaction to finally being confronted about the wine…Monika moaned in to the phone for 20 seconds and then came up with the quick excuse that she washed sick off Jimi’s face with wine…Only the problem was there was no vomit washed off Jimi’s face when the ambulance men got there…Monika was lying because she knew she got caught over the wine she knew was used to murder Jimi…
For Jason’s crude denials and accusations of lying to be true would require Sharon to concoct a well detailed lie in her description of Monika’s painful reaction to being asked about the wine…The wine obviously had painful significance to Monika or she wouldn’t have reacted that way…What Jason is ignoring and hoping he fools people over is the fact people don’t do painful moaning reactions to wine that doesn’t exist or doesn’t keep showing up in the witnessing…
Where Jason loses is out in the common sense world of reality where a jury would evaluate his input and ask themselves if the obvious excuse of Sharon’s wrong claim of magic number 9 suicide is adequate replacement for the direct evidence of Sharon’s confronting Monika about the wine?…Is it believable that Sharon completely fabricated that story with so much incriminating detail?…They would ask themselves why Jason spends so much effort trying to discredit Sharon and what he was trying to hide by doing that?…
So the evidence once again goes unanswered by Jason of how could Jimi be soaked in wine after he lost consciousness and what does that tell you evidence-wise?…Why are people pouring wine on Jimi instead of saving him?…The answer is quite simple, as is the obviousness of Jason’s avoidance of it…The wine Monika confirmed to Sharon Lawrence, that matched the wine repeatedly witnessed elsewhere, was wine that spilled over as it was being forced down Jimi’s throat at the Samarkand…Monika moaned in reaction because she knew she had finally been brought to “that place” that she had successfully avoided with the aid of the criminal British government for so many years…If we were to criticize Sharon Lawrence it would be for not playing it smart and pretending she was Monika’s friend…If Sharon were really a friend of Jimi’s she would have sympathized with Monika and invited her to California where she could have asked Monika more questions about what happened and drew her in deeper…That way Sharon could have confronted Monika with the fact the ambulance men witnessed a Jimi with no vomit washed off his face and recorded her answer…
JASON says: Buster still avoided and danced around the fact that he won’t call Sharon Lawrence a liar for writing in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on the number 9 and being obsessed with the occult.
Buster says I’m “discrediting” and “defaming” Sharon Lawrence for posting what she wrote in her fiction book about Jimi Hendrix committing suicide based on the number 9 and his obsession with the occult. Buster must agree with Sharon Lawrence since he is attacking me when he should be excoriating Sharon Lawrence for printing bogus lies in her fiction book.
Buster is too stupid to realize that Sharon Lawrence already confirmed in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on the number 9. So, all this wine nonsense that Buster is rambling on about is completely useless and irrelevant.
According to Sharon Lawrence, Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills. Jimi would already be dead by death of suicide from 9 pills, so there would be no need for any of the imaginary wine that Buster is ranting about. But in his delusional haze, Buster gives us fake stories of imaginary wine. Buster is caught in a huge contradiction.
Sharon Lawrence already said Jimi committed suicide with 9 pills, so no wine can be in play with additional fake stories of wine. That is Sharon Lawrence’s story in which you agree with her.
You can’t have it both ways Buster, it can’t be a suicide with pills and a death by wine too.
Sharon Lawrence strictly wrote in her fiction book it was suicide with 9 pills and not death by wine. Sharon Lawrence debunked your wine hoax. Freaking hilarious!
Hi Jason, Buster has become judge and jury in this story even though there is no one left to prosecute. The main players in this saga are all dead. If Sharon believed Monika’s story about the wine she would not have included in her book that Jimi committed suicide. It proved that Sharon did not buy into the wine story either and believes the barbiturates caused his death just like the autopsy report states.
Sharon said suicide and Buster is having a hard explaining it.
This is how Jason operates…When you accuse him of switching the topic to the magic number 9 sleeping pills in order to dishonestly avoid discussing Sharon Lawrence’s witnessing of Monika making an excuse about the wine, he responds by once again switching the subject to the magic number 9 pills and never discusses the finer details of Sharon Lawrence’s witnessing…Jason does this for two reasons…The first reason is because Jason is a sick bastard who likes flaunting his violations right in your face for effect…He’s doing it because he knows it irritates me (that’s what trolls do)…Maximum nay-saying effect in other words from someone who is being deliberately uncooperative and dishonest…”Trolling”…The second reason is because Jason knows Sharon’s witnessing of Monika saying she poured wine on Jimi is totally separate from Sharon’s false number 9 pill theory…The reason Sharon is not lying about Monika being asked about the wine is because Monika’s reaction is exactly what you would have expected from a person in her position…It simply isn’t believable that Sharon would have fabricated that moaning 20 second delay and been that premeditated and devious a liar…What Jason is obviously avoiding with his trolling here is answering for the fact there was no vomit washed away according to the ambulance men…So that means Monika was lying about the wine…The reason Monika lied about the wine was because she knew it was used to murder Jimi…Jason knows this which is why he obnoxiously responds by once again trying to switch the subject to Sharon’s magic number 9 pill Russian roulette suicide theory…
It’s clear who is trolling and “dancing around the point” here and it isn’t me…
A jury would make quick work of Jason and his painfully obvious conscious evasions of the main evidence being discussed…Jason literally cannot answer the direct evidence of Monika’s moaning reaction and lie about washing vomit off Jimi’s face with wine obviously being details that Sharon Lawrence could not have fabricated…That same jury would see Sharon answer Jason’s smears directly and in person and hear more evidence that proved the realness of Sharon’s conversation with Monika…Because Jason is allowed to judge his own input he thinks he is getting away with once again switching the subject instead of answering this proof…Well, he isn’t and he is only proving my case once again by repeating the same lies and not answering the correct proof…That conversation happened exactly as Sharon told it and it proves the wine Jason is obviously lying and trolling over in denial…Jason thinks his switching to the strawman of Sharon’s number 9 pills saves him from answering for Monika’s admission of the wine…It doesn’t and by failing to answer that he loses and the wine he is in childish denial of doesn’t go away…Sharon’s questions about the wine were the beginning of a process that led directly to Monika’s death…
Buster believes Sharon’s stories about Monika moaning but why won’t Buster believe her stories of Jimi committing suicide?
Buster was asked a simple question and he refuses to answer or discuss it. Instead of being honest and admitting he has a severe contradiction in his phony theory, he decides to be a coward and attack me instead for pointing it out to him. That is pathetic and how Buster operates. He cherry picks the phony claims of Sharon Lawrence that he likes and refuses to discuss the contradictions of a Hendrix suicide that refutes his phony claim. Buster can’t use contradictions as claims cuz it doesn’t work.
So Buster, what made Sharon Lawrence write in her book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on his obsession with the number 9 and the occult?
Buster are you going to call Sharon Lawrence a liar for printing Jimi Hendrix killed himself with 9 pills based o the number 9?
You say Sharon Lawrence is not a liar and prints accurate information. Is Sharon Lawrence accurate that Jimi committed suicide?
How can Sharon Lawrence be believed when she makes up wild and phony stories to sell books?
BUSTER says: This is how Jason operates…When you accuse him of switching the topic to the magic number 9 sleeping pills in order to dishonestly avoid discussing Sharon Lawrence’s witnessing of Monika making an excuse about the wine, he responds by once again switching the subject to the magic number 9 pills and never discusses the finer details of Sharon Lawrence’s witnessing…
JASON says: Sorry Buster, no topic is being switched here and there is no dishonesty. Sharon Lawrence confirmed in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix took 9 pills and committed suicide based on numerology of the number 9. Sharon said that Jimi was obsessed with the number 9 and occult books. She also spoke of wine that is irrelevant since she already confirmed Jimi committed suicide.
You can’t claim a suicide by pills and also have “wine”, it doesn’t work since Jimi was already dead from the pills. This debunks your phony wine claim
BUSTER says: Jason does this for two reasons…The first reason is because Jason is a sick bastard who likes flaunting his violations right in your face for effect…He’s doing it because he knows it irritates me (that’s what trolls do)…Maximum nay-saying effect in other words from someone who is being deliberately uncooperative and dishonest…”Trolling”…
JASON says: These are your violations Buster. You refuse to address them and attack me instead. You are trying to claim Jimi was “drowned to death in wine” but your hero Sharon Lawrence, the woman you get the bulk of your information from, says Jimi committed suicide by taking 9 pills. Sharon Lawrence debunks your phony wine claim too and you refuse to answer your violations.
Buster is working hard here to avoid my question as to why Sharon Lawrence would print Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills and Buster falsely wants to claim a phony wine “murder”. Wine is irrelevant since Jimi killed himself with 9 pills according to Sharon Lawrence.
So, there would be no “lungs full of wine’ in Jimi Hendrix when Jimi killed himself with pills according to Sharon Lawrence. No “imbibed wine” could be in Jimi cuz he killed himself with pills. How can the “wine” get there when Jimi was already dead by suicide? Buster dances like a ballerina around this issue.
Sharon Lawrence terribly contradicted herself and wants to make two different phony claims and Buster believes her made up “wine” lies to fit is phony narrative. Sharon is a liar and got caught. She should have had a better editor proofread her book for all the phony claims she made.
BUSTER says: The second reason is because Jason knows Sharon’s witnessing of Monika saying she poured wine on Jimi is totally separate from Sharon’s false number 9 pill theory…
JASON says: Sorry Buster, it is not separate and you know it. Sharon Lawrence said Jimi killed himself with pills by suicide. That is the end of Jimi’s life. The Monika wine claim makes no sense when Jimi is already dead from a suicide. The wine claim is totally useless and irrelevant and you know it. That’s why you refuse to answer it honestly
BUSTER says: The reason Sharon is not lying about Monika being asked about the wine is because Monika’s reaction is exactly what you would have expected from a person in her position…
JASON says: Buster just admitted Sharon Lawrence is a liar and this is another fake story from lyin’ Sharon Lawrence who needed to add some drama to her boring book.
“What what you would have expected from a person in her position” Buster says, so basically Buster is admitting that this isn’t even factual information. This is why Sharon Lawrence is not to be believed cuz she is a liar. She lied many times and is lying again.
BUSTER says: It simply isn’t believable that Sharon would have fabricated that moaning 20 second delay and been that premeditated and devious a liar…
JASON says: Buster, It simply isn’t believable that Sharon would have fabricated her confirmation of Jimi committing suicide based on the number 9 and the occult. Do you agree with that? Don’t do a Turkey Trot and dance around it again Buster. Answer the question
Of course it is believable Sharon fabricated another lie. She lied saying that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on the number 9. She said Jimi was an occult fanatic. Sharon fabricated in her book where Jimi Hendrix was born. She lied and said it was a family friend’s house when Jimi was born on this day at King County hospital. Sharon made up fake quotes about Jimi’s dead mother. Sharon lied about Meehan and Thurston cuz Jimi committed suicide she said. How could he be “imbibed with wine” when he was dead from pills? She is lying and fabricating this too. This woman is a liar.
BUSTER says: What Jason is obviously avoiding with his trolling here is answering for the fact there was no vomit washed away according to the ambulance men…So that means Monika was lying about the wine…The reason Monika lied about the wine was because she knew it was used to murder Jimi…Jason knows this which is why he obnoxiously responds by once again trying to switch the subject to Sharon’s magic number 9 pill Russian roulette suicide theory…
JASON says: Here is another bogus made up claim by Buster that is easily shot down. Jimi was very sick from taking an overdose 9 pills and was vomiting. When a person is really sick they vomit more than once. So, Jimi was vomiting again after Monika said she wiped Jimi’s face. Very weak claim from Buster.
Buster still hasn’t answered the fact that since Jimi died from the pills the phony wine murder doesn’t work.
BUSTER says: It’s clear who is trolling and “dancing around the point” here and it isn’t me…
JASON says: Yes it is you. Buster is trolling and dancing around the issue of Sharon Lawrence’s Hendrix suicide confirmation. Buster has not answered any questions and has avoided them to attack me.
Sharon Lawrence has made a serious charge in her book that Jimi committed suicide and Buster dances around the issue doing a Turkey Trot avoiding her charge.
The fact Sharon Lawrence confirmed Jimi committed suicide makes all these wine claims useless and irrelevant and Buster knows it. That’s why he is trying super hard to avoid it while attacking me instead.
BUSTER says: A jury would make quick work of Jason and his painfully obvious conscious evasions of the main evidence being discussed…
JASON says: The jury would see you are avoiding the question asked of you. The jury would see Sharon Lawrence is a liar. The jury would see her wine claims are fake. The jury would vote against your fake “wine murder” theory since you never have posted any real documented evidence. The jury would convict you for blatant lying and changing your fake claims when it suits you.
BUSTER says: Jason literally cannot answer the direct evidence of Monika’s moaning reaction and lie about washing vomit off Jimi’s face with wine obviously being details that Sharon Lawrence could not have fabricated…
JASON says: There is no direct evidence of Monika “moaning” since a confirmed liar Sharon Lawrence wrote it in her book. Does Sharon have Monka’s voice on tape moaning? If there is no proof of that it didn’t happen.
So, she washed his face off. That is not evidence of a “wine drowning” and you have no documented evidence to prove it.
Buster likes to cherry pick which lies Sharon Lawrence tells that fits his phony narrative
Buster, why do you believe Sharon Lawrence about Monika moaning and not Jimi committing suicide?
BUSTER says: That same jury would see Sharon answer Jason’s smears directly and in person and hear more evidence that proved the realness of Sharon’s conversation with Monika…
JASON says: Sorry Buster, a jury doesn’t believe a confirmed liar like Sharon Lawrence or you. She already committed perjury once under oath and you lie in each sentence you write.
Buster believes Sharon’s stories about Monika moaning but why won’t Buster believe her stories of Jimi committing suicide?
BUSTER says: Because Jason is allowed to judge his own input he thinks he is getting away with once again switching the subject instead of answering this proof…Well, he isn’t and he is only proving my case once again by repeating the same lies and not answering the correct proof…That conversation happened exactly as Sharon told it and it proves the wine Jason is obviously lying and trolling over in denial…Jason thinks his switching to the strawman of Sharon’s number 9 pills saves him from answering for Monika’s admission of the wine…It doesn’t and by failing to answer that he loses and the wine he is in childish denial of doesn’t go away…Sharon’s questions about the wine were the beginning of a process that led directly to Monika’s death…
JASON says: More evasion and dancing from Buster. The wine is irrelevant cuz Sharon Lawrence confirmed Jimi committed suicide. Wine makes no sense when jimi was already dead
Hilarious how Buster chooses to believe one of Sharon Lawrence’s lies over the other.
The only reason Buster believes this wine nonsense from Sharon Lawrence is cuz he uses it to push his phony debunked wine hoax.
Buster, why aren’t you stating Jimi committed suicide like Sharon Lawrence confirmed?
Your wine claim is useless since the pills killed Jimi.
Jason: You’re a trolling idiot who doesn’t know what he’s talking about…You just expended a huge amount of trolling energy pushing your lies about Sharon Lawrence but you are too stupid to realize that Sharon wrote in her book that the wine Monika poured down Jimi’s throat is what killed him…
Jason learned about this subject for the first time when he decided to troll this comments section…He’s going and lifting the dopey stuff written on Crosstown Torrents and is using it directly to flood this thread with denial trolling, but he obviously hasn’t read Sharon’s book because if he had he wouldn’t have made so stupid a mistake as to say Sharon said Jimi committed suicide from the pills…Anyone with common sense could read what Sharon wrote and realize the reason she was grilling Monika about the wine was because she thought it had something to do with Jimi’s death…
The reason this little trolling worm Jason, who is just thinking of any crazy shit to get out of the evidence he can post back at you, is saying Sharon claimed Jimi committed suicide is because he is desperately trying to get out of admitting that Monika proved the wine was real…Like everything Jason posts, he’s obnoxiously constructing a logical excuse and using it to get out of honestly answering the obvious facts I am uncovering…Jason is trying to say Sharon’s 9 pill claim disqualifies everything else, but that is just silly children’s trolling that Jason is once again using to avoid honestly discussing the fact Monika did moan in to the telephone and did say exactly what Sharon quoted…If we could get Sharon Lawrence to confront this trolling asshole Jason we would quickly see who was lying and it isn’t Sharon…
Admit you haven’t even read the book Jason and therefore admit you just made a trolling ass out of yourself by stupidly and publicly not being aware that Sharon said the wine Monika poured in to Jimi was what killed him…What Jason is desperately avoiding here through children’s trolling is the fact Monika’s admitted wine is yet another witness to wine being on Jimi at the Samarkand and therefore confirms and corroborates the whole chain of witnessing of that wine from Brown to Siefert to Bannister to Thurston and finally to Crompton…If Monika poured wine on Jimi at the Samarkand then the ambulance men saw it too…
Nice troll Jason but it isn’t working…
After Buster gets finished twisting himself into a pretzel and doing his turkey trot dancing away from this major conflicting issue of his, maybe he will finally be honest and answer these questions he is hiding from. A credible researcher and “Hendrix expert” certainly wouldn’t behave in this manner.
Buster, why do you believe Sharon Lawrence about Monika moaning and not Jimi committing suicide?
Buster, what made Sharon Lawrence write in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on his obsession with the number 9 and the occult?
Buster, where did Sharon Lawrence get her Jimi Hendrix suicide confirmation from? Surely she had to get it from somewhere credible since she was a “serious reporter” and “Hendrix inisider”.
Buster, how can Jimi Hendrix commit suicide and then later be “murdered by wine” in two different and separate deaths as reported by “the great” Sharon Lawrence? Did Jimi come back to life after a suicide to then be “murdered by wine” after?
That’s why these phony wine claims are ridiculous and get worse with each fake story teller. Then we have a gullible sucker named “Buster” who gobbles up all these fake stories faster than a Thanksgiving dinner. Yes folks, a sucker is born every minute and Buster was first in line.
BUSTER says: You just expended a huge amount of trolling energy pushing your lies about Sharon Lawrence
JASON says: What lies are you claiming Buster? Sharon Lawrence lied about Jimi Hendrix committing suicide. You are saying Sharon Lawrence is not a liar. So, that must mean you agree with her that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide. Is that correct?
BUSTER says: You just expended a huge amount of trolling energy pushing your lies about Sharon Lawrence but you are too stupid to realize that Sharon wrote in her book that the wine Monika poured down Jimi’s throat is what killed him…
JASON says: Sharon Lawrence confirmed in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on numerology with his obsession with the number 9 and the occult. Jimi was dead from his own suicide. How can Monika then kill Jimi by “pouring wine” down his throat when Jimi was already dead from his own suicide? These two different phony claims for Jimi who can only die one death, not two different ones.
BUSTER says: Jason: You’re a trolling idiot who doesn’t know what he’s talking about…You just expended a huge amount of trolling energy pushing your lies about Sharon Lawrence but you are too stupid to realize that Sharon wrote in her book that the wine Monika poured down Jimi’s throat is what killed him…
JASON says: Buster is the trolling idiot who is too stupid to realize that Sharon Lawrence already confirmed in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix already committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on numerology and the occult. Any new phony claims of “wine pouring” down Jimi’s throat is impossible since Sharon already confirmed Jimi killed himself with pills.
Sharon Lawrence and Buster can’t have it both ways and confirm a suicide and then later claim a phony “wine drowning”. These are two different conflicting and contradicting claims that easily prove how fake and phony these stories are.
This is why this is all a hoax. Sharon Lawrence has two fake claims for Jimi’s death and Buster uses the fake wine claim cuz it fits with his phony wine narrative. Like i said from the outset, Sharon’s claims are more phony than a 3 dollar bill.
So Sharon Lawrence in her ineptness as a fiction writer, wants to claim Jimi committed suicide in some weird black magic occult pact, but then woke from the dead to get “murdered by wine” with a moaning Monika Dannemann. Lawrence is a liar and has been debunked with her fake claims as she adds to the list of wine fiction phonies.
BUSTER says: Jason learned about this subject for the first time when he decided to troll this comments section…
JASON says: Buster uses this lame line each time he gets his ass kicked and has no real answer to give.
BUSTER says: He’s going and lifting the dopey stuff written on Crosstown Torrents and is using it directly to flood this thread with denial trolling, but he obviously hasn’t read Sharon’s book because if he had he wouldn’t have made so stupid a mistake as to say Sharon said Jimi committed suicide from the pills…Anyone with common sense could read what Sharon wrote and realize the reason she was grilling Monika about the wine was because she thought it had something to do with Jimi’s death…
JASON says: Nice fake story change and the usual obfuscation as the wine troll turkey fraud you are. Sharon Lawrence clearly said that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on numerology cuz he was obsessed with the number 9 and the occult. The fake wine claims are irrelevant since Jimi already killed himself with pills.
You still haven’t told us this answer. What would make Sharon Lawrence write that Jimi committed suicide with 9 pills based on numerology of the number 9 and the occult?
Why don’t you believe Sharon Lawrence’s Hendrix suicide claim when she is not a liar as you claim?
BUSTER says: The reason this little trolling worm Jason, who is just thinking of any crazy shit to get out of the evidence he can post back at you, is saying Sharon claimed Jimi committed suicide is because he is desperately trying to get out of admitting that Monika proved the wine was real…Like everything Jason posts, he’s obnoxiously constructing a logical excuse and using it to get out of honestly answering the obvious facts I am uncovering…Jason is trying to say Sharon’s 9 pill claim disqualifies everything else, but that is just silly children’s trolling that Jason is once again using to avoid honestly discussing the fact Monika did moan in to the telephone and did say exactly what Sharon quoted…If we could get Sharon Lawrence to confront this trolling asshole Jason we would quickly see who was lying and it isn’t Sharon…
JASON says: So, you defend Sharon Lawrence and say she isn’t a liar. So, that absolutely confirms that you believe her story in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on numerology of the number 9 and he was obsessed with the occult. You can no longer claim your phony murder by wine claims.
How can the “wine” be “real” when Sharon Lawrence confirmed in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide? What would be the point of “wine” after the fact when Jimi was already dead from a suicide? Makes absolutely no sense at all.
Also, no wine was ever witnessed at the death scene. So, the “wine” is definitely not “real” and you have no documented evidence or testimony that proves “wine” at Monika’s flat. All we have is a fraudulent liar named Sharon Lawrence giving a bogus 2001 account of fake wine in her fiction book 5 years after Monika died.
Sharon Lawrence bluntly wrote that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide. Sharon and Buster then can’t claim after Jimi was “murdered” by wine . These are two different conflicting and contradicting claims. A person cannot partake in suicide and then later be “murdered” by imaginary wine. That is impossible. But this is the garbage Buster peddles for his hoax and it’s why he routinely gets his ass kicked on this site by a superior poster.
BUSTER says: Admit you haven’t even read the book Jason and therefore admit you just made a trolling ass out of yourself by stupidly and publicly not being aware that Sharon said the wine Monika poured in to Jimi was what killed him…What Jason is desperately avoiding here through children’s trolling is the fact Monika’s admitted wine is yet another witness to wine being on Jimi at the Samarkand and therefore confirms and corroborates the whole chain of witnessing of that wine from Brown to Siefert to Bannister to Thurston and finally to Crompton…If Monika poured wine on Jimi at the Samarkand then the ambulance men saw it too…
JASON says: I’ve read fiction books Buster and Sharon Lawrence writes really bad fiction. Admit your wine hoax is finished like a well done turkey.
Your trolling spiel of imaginary wine doesn’t work at this juncture. Sharon Lawrence confirmed in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide. Wine is impossible after her Jimi Hendrix suicide confirmation.
Sharon Lawrence confirmed in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide. Then she wants to bring out the imaginary wine and you just wrote a bunch of fiction yourself in your crazy head trying to convince yourself of imaginary wine.
No wine was ever witnessed at the death scene. Ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed wine or spoke of it in their testimony. Officer Ian Smith never witnessed any wine either. Neither did the coroner’s officers who collected the remaining pills and blankets for evidence. Who at the flat witnessed this imaginary wine since nobody is on record ever talking about it?
Dr. Bob Brown never witnessed any wine either. He is never on any official record talking wine either. Dr. Brown confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose.
Dr. Thurston never witnessed any wine either and never documented wine in his final report. Sharon Lawrence wrote a fake quote about Thurston in her fiction book. So that is another bullshit claim from her.
Dr. Crompton never witnessed any wine cuz he just read Dr. Teare’s autopsy report over 20 years later. Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal and toxic amount of barbiturates that killed him. Dr. Crompton never confirmed anything about this imaginary wine. This fake wine only lives in your crazy head Buster.
Buster tells us his usual fantasy story of imaginary wine trying to convince himself it exists in his head after he still dances away from the serious Hendrix suicide confirmation by Sharon Lawrence.
Buster is still not able to produce a statement from Dr. Crompton stating Jimi had “lungs full of wine”.
So, not one of these men mentioned above ever witnessed any wine and Buster the fraud lies about it for his fake debunked hoax. That is truly pathetic.
Buster claims Jimi was “covered in wine” but the forensic analysis of Jimi’s body during the autopsy detected no wine. If Jimi was drowned in wine inside and out as Buster claims, it would have shown up in an autopsy. No wine ever did for Jimi Hendrix. This is a dead hoax.
So much for this huge “wine drowning” all these conflicting and bogus claims prove that it never happened.
Buster’s wine hoax is finished like a well done turkey. Gobble Gobble!
Jimi would have been 77 today 27/11/1942.
Today is Jimi’s Birthday. I’m sure if he was still alive he would still be recording music.
Fluid on the lungs is caused by exposure to certain toxins and medications and is a sign of a drugs overdose. It does not suggest that Jimi was murdered by having wine poured into him or that the fluid was wine as Buster is trying to hoodwink us into believing. What was found in Jimi’s lungs was vomit caused by the high levels of barbiturates in his system which flowed back into his lungs causing asphyxiation. Jimi was knocked out by the toxic dose of the Vesparax therefore he could not throw up the contents of his stomach lying on his back. As Mr Saua mentioned if Jimi had been lying on his side he might have survived; this doesn’t mean that wine was witnessed all over Jimi or that anyone intentionally killed him by waterboarding him with wine or washing sick off Jimi with wine as Monika suggested. This all points to a lack of any great quantity of wine at the scene that morning. Monika’s statements have been discredited over the years so it doesn’t make sense that she would be admitting to killing Jimi intentionally or unintentionally.
(Hello friends! Well today is Turkey day and Buster is the “King of all Turkeys” as he lies and changes phony stories for his fake “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax”. Buster has been caught in many lies and changing of stories during his many “debates” over the past 10 years. That’s how we all know Buster is fraud running a hoax. This new continuing series will feature the many fake claims Buster has used or changed which already has been debunked. These fake claims are what he has used for his phony myth he calls “evidence”. None of this stuff is confirmed or real documented evidence. It’s just a bunch of phony absurd claims and theories too ridiculous to believe told by fraud sources or made up in Buster’s crazy head. Each time we start with 5 new ones but here are the inaugural 5 fake claims from Buster.)
“The Ridiculous And Asinine Debunked Claims That Buster Uses For His Phony And Made Up Jimi Hendrix ‘Murder’ Hoax”
By Jason
#1. Tappy Wright’s phony Michael Jeffery “murder” claim
For years, Buster pushed the bogus lie created by Tappy “the fraud” Wright that Michael Jeffery was at the flat and “murdered” Jimi Hendrix. This is false cuz Jeffery was in Spain, and would be impossible for Jeffery to be in two different countries at once. So, this hoax was debunked a long time ago, but that didn’t stop Buster from still pushing this hoax and using it for his phony “murder” theory. Later, Buster changed his “murder claim” to anybody he wants to use as his “killers”. He claimed the mafia, US or UK government or intelligence, black panthers, “London thugs” who just happen to coincidentally pass by the flat knowing Jimi took 9 pills and decided to “drown him in wine” while ironically walking with 5 full wine bottles in hand, Monika Dannemann, or anybody he wants to use at the time. This is an easy debunked hoax cuz no actual “murder” can have various groups or individuals changing in each story as Buster wants it to. Also, the only official stories of Jimi’s death is Tappy Wright’s phony Michael Jeffery claim and Sharon Lawrence’s Jimi Hendrix suicide claim. So, Buster has to pick either debunked claim. Buster doesn’t get to make up his own fake stories in his crazy head and claim it as real evidence. Buster’s fake stories never happened. Which is why Buster is running a hoax based on his own fake claims he assembles to create his fake “murder” myth.
#2. Jeffery had the “means and the motive” to kill Jimi
Here is another bogus claim used by Buster that he parrots from his phony sources. Buster makes the bogus claim that Jimi fired Jeffery which gave Jeffery the motive to kill Jimi a few hours later on short notice from another country. Buster’s “big time” source for this phony claim is Monika Dannemann of all people. This is the same woman who Buster calls a liar and moans about her “pouring wine” on Jimi from his other phony source Sharon Lawrence. So that’s two phony sources Buster associates for his fake “murder” theory with. Monika lies about everything but that doesn’t stop Buster for using her made up story to fit his phony narrative. Buster is a cherry picker extraordinaire who uses dubious sources to concoct his fake “murder” myth. Doesn’t matter to Buster which debunked source he uses as long as it fits with his fake claim. Jeffery was in Spain, so he did not have the means since he was in a different country. The kicker here is that Jimi never fired Jeffery, so there was no motive, and this is another confirmed hoax that is easily debunked. So, Jeffery did not have the “means or the motive” and is more proof that Jimi was not “murdered”. But Buster uses this fake claim and pushes this lie each time it suits him.
#3. Ambulance attendants and the police witnessed pure wine at the death scene
Here is another bogus claim that Buster parroted for years until I called him out on it and then Buster decided to play word games changing his fake story to “vomit means wine”. Ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones never witnessed any pure wine anywhere at the flat. They never mention the word wine in their testimony or even hint at spilled pure alcohol at the death scene. Officer Ian Smith never witnessed any wine himself either, and in fact, Officer Ian Smith confirmed that Jimi was a routine drug overdose since he said he “received many calls like that in those days”. Officer Ian Smith sure wasn’t getting many “wine drowning” calls from Ambulance Man John Saua. Even Ambulance Man Reginal Jones said “Jimi choked on vomit” and only described vomit at the death scene. So, what would make Buster say all 3 of these men witnessed copious amounts of wine when “wine” is never described by them in any testimony? What would make Buster say gallons of pure wine was “spilled all over the bed and Jimi in an act of homicide” when not one person at the flat witnessed this scene? Saua, Jones, Smith never spoke of a “homicide scene” and they were there to witness it. Buster the Turkey was not there and is making up fake stories or parroting false information from fraud sources. 3 men who were there did not witness what Buster claims. The coroner’s officers who investigated the death scene did not witness a “homicide scene”. They saw no wine either. The blankets they collected for forensic analysis turned up no wine since no wine was ever documented. Wine wasn’t even in play cuz they were only looking for what drugs Jimi took since Hendrix overdosed. Even Sharon Lawrence said Jimi overdosed in suicide. Buster is a liar and a fraud who makes up his own phony claims for imaginary wine as he narrates his fake version of events like the troll he is. No wine was ever witnessed at the death scene and Buster lied and said they all witnessed wine. What a fraudulent lying turd.
#4. Jimi had a “hard plug of vomit” in his throat to hide the imaginary wine
Now this is absurd and ridiculous and just made up by Buster. Medically speaking this isn’t even possible, but it doesn’t stop Buster from making up fraudulent claims. Neither ambulance man John Saua or Reginal Jones ever stated they witnessed a “hard plug of vomit”. Buster cannot point to where either of these men said they “could not penetrate a hard plug of vomit” in their testimony since they never said that. Buster plays word games claiming people made statements that they never made. Then Buster claims “that’s what they meant” and uses those fake claims for his fraudulent hoax. After that, Buster asks you fake questions based on his fake claim and tells you that you “avoid answering the evidence” and “you lost the debate” when the whole thing is just total b.s made up by Buster. That’s how Buster rolls and plays his trolling games. But this phony claim is easily debunked cuz Fraud Bannister never spoke about this fake “hard plug of vomit” and confirmed there was no blockage of Jimi’s airways. Also, Buster claimed Jimi had wine up to his throat. A fake “hard plug of vomit” could not form with a flooded throat full of wine. Buster is now claiming “lungs full of fluid” this is not possible with his fake “hard plug of vomit” and Buster debunks his own fake theory as he switches them whenever he chooses.
#5. Sharon Lawrence wrote in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on his obsession with the number 9 and the occult
Buster became angry with me for not believing Sharon Lawrence when I called her a liar for printing absurd lies in her fiction book. Buster says Sharon Lawrence is not a liar and all her stories must be believed like Jimi being born at a family friend’s house when everybody knows Jimi was born at King County hospital. Sharon also committed felony perjury in court, but Buster ignores the fact that lying is no problem for Sharon Lawrence.
Buster like the cherry picker extraordinaire he is, uses the lies Sharon tells that fits with his phony “murder” narrative and avoids the rest of her lies refusing to acknowledge any of them. Sharon confirmed that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on numerology. Sharon says that Jimi was obsessed with the number 9 which is why he killed himself taking 9 pills based on numerology. Sharon went so far to say that Jimi was heavily into the occult and was an avid reader of occult books partaking in black magic. Bizarre accounts from Sharon. Sharon said Jimi was out of it, despondent, in a haze, and felt dead to the world in his last days. Others who were around Jimi during his last few days dispute Sharon’s claim. Since Sharon is not a liar, and only prints accurate accounts like Buster tells us, then Buster then accepts Sharon Lawrence’s confirmation that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills. Sharon would not lie like Buster tells us, and since Sharon was a serious “Hendrix insider”, then she is telling the truth about Jimi Hendrix committing suicide according to Buster.
Now Sharon also wrote about imaginary wine, that Buster uses for his wine hoax, telling us Monika “moaned for Sharon and poured wine on Jimi”. What would be the point of this “wine pouring” when Jimi already killed himself with 9 pills in suicide? Why does Sharon need to invent wine after she wrote Jimi committed suicide with 9 pills? Sharon severly contradicts herself here wanting a Hendrix suicide and then for some odd reason she feels to need to claim Monika was pouring wine on him. Was Monika trying to wake up a dead man who killed himself on pills? Since Jimi was already dead from the pills in suicide, the wine becomes useless and no “murder” is possible when Sharon Lawrence confirmed the Hendrix suicide. There can’t be both a suicide and a phony “murder”. So, Buster and Sharon are stuck between a rock and a hard place.
Sharon also treated us to her phony claim she made up of obscure reporter Jack Meehan and the famous London coroner Dr. Gavin Thurston. Sharon printed a second hand quote in her fiction book that Thurston told Meehan on the sly that Jimi Hendrix was “fairly imbibed with wine”. Funny how Dr. Thurston never told this to all the other reporters who spoke to him about Jimi. Jack Meehan was the only secret recipient he spilled the beans to. And he never bothered to report it in the press and only happened to tell Sharon Lawrence and she never reported it either. What a crock of shit. Dr. Thurston never documented this wine in his final report. What a fake phony story this is since no wine ever existed.
Sharon Lawrence confirmed Jimi Hendrix committed suicide in her book. Now she is talking about “imbibed wine”. Jimi can’t be “imbibed with wine” when he already killed himself with pills. That is a major conflict with stories. Since Sharon Lawrence is not a liar as Buster says, and confirmed Jimi died from suicide, that means Buster says her story stands and Jimi cannot be “murdered with wine” since two separate deaths for one person is not possible.
Buster, how did Jimi become “imbibed with wine” when he already committed suicide with pills?
Buster, why didn’t Dr. Teare discover any wine anywhere inside or outside of Jimi’s body?
Buster, what made Sharon Lawrence write in her book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on numerology and the occult?
Hi Jason, great post. Monika was interviewed by a German reporter from the publication Bild after she left the hotel where she was staying with Eric Burdon after Jimi’s death. She told him that she had given Jimi the pills. When Monika invited Kathy to her home in Seaford she said the same thing. Monika then tells Caesar Glebbeek that the Mafia killed Jimi for sure in a radio interview in the mid 70’s. She then accuses the doctors of medical negligence when they failed to perform a tracheotomy on Jimi and she did the same thing to the ambulance officers by stating that they placed Jimi on a chair with his head back. She then tells Sharon Lawrence about washing sick of Jimi’s face with wine which is something she had never mentioned before. Like Tony Brown said everything Monika said was designed to distance herself from any blame about the events that morning and nothing she said can be taken seriously. It’s
possible she only went along with Sharon to humour her and get her on side for whatever reason probably to get some information about Jimi for her book The Inner World of Jimi Hendrix as Sharon suspected.
Hi Ivana,
Thanks and I think you’re right about that, since Monika always said she gave Jimi the pills. The only discrepancy was when she said the “pills were weak”, and then “they were strong” which they were. Sharon Lawrence isn’t credible, so whatever she writes should be taken with a grain of salt. I see Buster is still unable to provide any answers for Sharon Lawrence’s Jimi Hendrix phony suicide claim that makes any wine claim after totally useless since Jimi was already dead. He couldn’t even answer for his debunked claims. All he posted was his usual fake bluster and his same go to debunked talking points.
More trolling from Jason…
Jason is a sick internet troll who has no credible background on this subject and is just pumping sick trolling in to the comments section with no intention of ever debating honestly…He first learned about this subject when he decided to troll it in this comments section so in no way should either Jason or his demented content ever be taken seriously…His methodology is to simply say no to everything and call everybody liars, which is just cheap trolling…
Because Jason is a sicko who likes to troll horrifically-victimized murder victim celebrities he is getting all his material by skimming comments sections where some very dumb Hendrix fans tried to argue against the murder evidence…Those comments sections on sites like Crosstown Torrents and elsewhere possessed some very sick minds, just like Jason’s, and they were very actively dedicated to entering devious non-truth, just like Jason…Because of that Jason’s weak kiddie trolling material lacks accuracy and substance because it is second-hand trolling Jason is copying from other comments sections…
With that said, Jason obviously hasn’t read Sharon Lawrence’s book even though he poses himself as an expert at it…You see, Jason is doing 12 year old kiddie trolling denial so his method and purpose doesn’t require actually reading the books he is citing or having any credible knowledge of what was written in them…If Jason had actually read the book instead of just posting other people’s trolling in order to get out of Monika’s wine witnessing, he would know that Sharon Lawrence wrote that Jimi took the magic number 9 pills in order to play a kind of cosmic Russian roulette where fate would decide whether or not he would live…In her incorrect speculation Sharon knew if Jimi had intended outright suicide he would have taken a larger number of pills…So Jason is once again pulling things out of his ass and lying when he says Sharon claimed Jimi committed suicide…She never did, if you bother the read the books you are referencing…But once again, anyone with a speck of common sense could see Jason’s focus on Sharon’s number 9 pill claim is just his way of getting out of admitting the wine Sharon had evidenced through Monika and isn’t to be taken seriously…Once you are discussing Jason’s evasive dodges Jason is very happy because that means you are not discussing the evidence he is trollishly avoiding…
The reason understanding exactly what Sharon wrote is important is because it is important to know Sharon was correctly saying that the 9 pill dose wasn’t fatal…And you can’t commit suicide, as Jason falsely insists, with only 9 Vesparax when you have Jimi’s famous tolerance…So in this correct context, that Jason is obviously trollishly ignorant of because he doesn’t know the material because he hasn’t read the book, Sharon’s confronting Monika over the wine was due to Sharon’s belief that it was what pushed Jimi over the edge and caused his death…If Jason had a more intelligent and informed knowledge of the book by actually reading it, he would know that his version of Sharon Lawrence is wrong and what I just wrote is the true context of Sharon’s confronting Monika about the wine…
Jason’s posts can be accurately described as making a huge trolling effort to avoid what he knows to be true…He is doing that here too by obnoxiously trolling nothing but the magic number 9 pill claim in order to avoid everything else…So we can ignore Jason’s idiotic denials and accept that Sharon’s account of Monika’s phone call is exactly accurate and happened exactly as she said…In a perfect world Sharon would come in here and rip Jason a new one, but short of that, more credible minds can accept Sharon’s account as accurate and realize Sharon got Monika to admit the wine in that phone call…By moaning for 20 seconds in to the phone Monika was telling the world that the wine was associated with something very painful in her mind…If we go to Sharon’s exact writing in her book she kind of fudges around asking Monika if she poured wine in to Jimi?…But there is no doubt that she got Monika to admit the wine Jason is doing sick denial trolling over…That wine was obviously the same wine witnessed by multiple other witnesses…
Assholes like Crosstown’s Jim Hawthorn say Jason is doing a good job refuting me…Hawthorn is known as “Purple Jim”…He is an infamous murder denier who goes out of his way to post wrong information on Jimi’s death to make it look like the murder claims are a hoax…He shares the same ill practice of Hendrix-betrayer Caesar Glebbeek…Like Jason, you can see Hawthorn and Glebbeek are liars because they ignore good evidence…Those Crosstown idiots know Jason is a nut and they also know there’s a lot more to it than what Jason posts, but being degenerate scum they will let Jason’s sick trolling stand because it works for their denial interests…
What Jason isn’t intelligently or honestly articulating is the fact Sharon confronted Monika on the wine because Dr Bannister’s claim had become known through the Hendrix grapevine by the time of that 1995 phone call…Plus, Sharon herself had witnessed Jack Meehan tell her that Dr Thurston mentioned Jimi having a stomach full of wine in September 1970…It is quite clear that Sharon had some kind of knowledge that the wine was a significant factor in Jimi’s death and that is why she confronted Monika and told her off in that phone call…That is the trouble with Sharon is, like Kathy, she doesn’t take the next necessary step and consider how Monika’s admitted wine relates to Dr Thurston’s…But there is no doubt for any intelligent person who is paying attention to all this that Sharon’s purpose in confronting Monika on the wine was to clear this up and make Monika aware that there were strong questions about the wine that people would hold her to – hence the moaning…Monika was dead less than a year later from this confrontation, and people do not end up dead over non-existent wine…
Jason’s denial trolling is designed to gum up the discussion in entangling bullshit and trolling in order to avoid the evidence Jason is fully aware is true…That way he doesn’t have to admit Sharon got Monika to confirm the wine Siefert said was covering Jimi…And once you confirm that wine you realize it has no place in any accidental death scenario where Jimi accidentally killed himself by taking too much Vesparax, as the Judas Glebbeek claimed…What this does is make clear that Jimi would not allow himself to be soaked in wine if he were conscious, which means the wine ended up on and in Jimi after he lost consciousness…Since the wine was administered after Jimi lost consciousness, and we have Dr’s Crompton and Thurston confirming Dr Bannister’s wine, we therefore have hard proof of homicide in this witnessing that none of Jason’s idiotic denial trolling can overturn or make go away…Jason hasn’t put a scratch on this and once anyone fills in all the evidence his trolling is ignoring it becomes clear…
Same posts full of hot air and phony narration from Buster who never posts any real documented evidence cuz he doesn’t have any. So we get treated to long winded posts about nothing.
BUSTER says: More trolling from Jason…
JASON says: I’m posting real documented and forensic evidence that debunks your hoax. You’ve been trolling for a decade pushing your phony debunked “Jimi Hendrix Murder” hoax in which you get banned from all the websites you post on.
BUSTER says: Jason is a sick internet troll who has no credible background on this subject and is just pumping sick trolling in to the comments section with no intention of ever debating honestly…He first learned about this subject when he decided to troll it in this comments section so in no way should either Jason or his demented content ever be taken seriously…His methodology is to simply say no to everything and call everybody liars, which is just cheap trolling…
JASON says: Buster likes to talk about nothing important and masks his cheap words for his non existent evidence of his imaginary wine. Buster has mental issues wanting Jimi to be “murdered” based on his own made up claims in his crazy head. I’ve never called “everybody liars”. Only the fraud sources you use who are confirmed liars: Tappy Wright, Sharon Lawrence and Fraud Bannister.
BUSTER says: Because Jason is a sicko who likes to troll horrifically-victimized murder victim celebrities he is getting all his material by skimming comments sections where some very dumb Hendrix fans tried to argue against the murder evidence…Those comments sections on sites like Crosstown Torrents and elsewhere possessed some very sick minds, just like Jason’s, and they were very actively dedicated to entering devious non-truth, just like Jason…Because of that Jason’s weak kiddie trolling material lacks accuracy and substance because it is second-hand trolling Jason is copying from other comments sections…
JASON says: Hilarious! More rambling from a clown who can’t produce any evidence for the bogus claims he makes. I guess he feels blowing hot air will make up for the fact he has nothing to prove. Buster trolls any website he can pushing this phony “murder hoax” where he gets laughed at and then banned for his abusive posts.
BUSTER says: With that said, Jason obviously hasn’t read Sharon Lawrence’s book even though he poses himself as an expert at it…You see, Jason is doing 12 year old kiddie trolling denial so his method and purpose doesn’t require actually reading the books he is citing or having any credible knowledge of what was written in them…
JASON says: Sharon Lawrence’s fiction book isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on. Sharon needed to make up fake claims to spice up her boring book. She couldn’t even correctly print where Jimi was born.
BUSTER says: If Jason had actually read the book instead of just posting other people’s trolling in order to get out of Monika’s wine witnessing, he would know that Sharon Lawrence wrote that Jimi took the magic number 9 pills in order to play a kind of cosmic Russian roulette where fate would decide whether or not he would live…
JASON says: This is called suicide, you moron.
BUSTER says: In her incorrect speculation Sharon knew if Jimi had intended outright suicide he would have taken a larger number of pills.
JASON says: This is your bogus speculation since 9 pills is an extreme dose of powerful pills.These 9 pills caused barbiturate poisoning that killed Jimi Hendrix.
BUSTER says: So Jason is once again pulling things out of his ass and lying when he says Sharon claimed Jimi committed suicide…She never did, if you bother the read the books you are referencing…
JASON says: Sharon Lawrence confirmed that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide in her fiction book and this wine troll “Buster” is trying to pathetically lie claiming she didn’t so he can still push his debunked hoax He can’t cuz he has a major conflict and contradiction that debunks his phony hoax.
BUSTER says But once again, anyone with a speck of common sense could see Jason’s focus on Sharon’s number 9 pill claim is just his way of getting out of admitting the wine Sharon had evidenced through Monika and isn’t to be taken seriously…Once you are discussing Jason’s evasive dodges Jason is very happy because that means you are not discussing the evidence he is trollishly avoiding…
JASON says: Anyone with a speck of common sense can see that after Sharon Lawrence claimed Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on numerology and the occult, hat he can’t wake up from the dead to be later “murdered by wine”. This makes your fake wine claim irrelevant and useless and you know it. Which is why you’re trying so hard to get out of it. You can’t!
BUSTER says: The reason understanding exactly what Sharon wrote is important is because it is important to know Sharon was correctly saying that the 9 pill dose wasn’t fatal…And you can’t commit suicide, as Jason falsely insists, with only 9 Vesparax when you have Jimi’s famous tolerance…
JASON says: Same bullshit claim that Buster the wine troll uses for his hoax and made up phony “forensic” claim. Jimi’s 9 pill dose was fatal cuz it killed him. Dr. Teare confirmed in 1970 that Jimi Hendrix died of barbiturate poisoning and Dr. Crompton confirmed that to Kathy over 20 years later when he read Jimi’s autopsy report. Real documented forensic evidence always refutes you fake and phony made up claims.
This wine troll Buster wrote a long winded post of garbage, so here’s the second part of my refuting this wine clown and his made up fantasy.
BUSTER says: So in this correct context, that Jason is obviously trollishly ignorant of because he doesn’t know the material because he hasn’t read the book, Sharon’s confronting Monika over the wine was due to Sharon’s belief that it was what pushed Jimi over the edge and caused his death…If Jason had a more intelligent and informed knowledge of the book by actually reading it, he would know that his version of Sharon Lawrence is wrong and what I just wrote is the true context of Sharon’s confronting Monika about the wine…
JASON says: “Buster’s” fake interpretation is not correct since Sharon Lawrence claimed Jimi Hendrix committed suicide with pills.That makes Buster’s phony wine claims irrelevant and he knows it. Which is why Buster is pathetically trying to talk his way out out it.
Sharon Lawrence’s claims are all bogus and she has no knowledge of anything. Kathy Etchingham concluded at the end of her investigation that Jimi died from toxic barbiturate poisoning that was confirmed to her by Dr. Rufus Crompton that Dr. Teare documented in 1970 on Jimi’s autopsy report. There was never any wine and Sharon Lawrence made up more crap for her fiction book.
BUSTER says: Jason’s posts can be accurately described as making a huge trolling effort to avoid what he knows to be true…He is doing that here too by obnoxiously trolling nothing but the magic number 9 pill claim in order to avoid everything else…
JASON says: Your 10 year trolling effort has failed and you wasted your time pushing this debunked hoax. The 9 pills that Jimi took caused toxic barbiturate poisoning which killed him. This was confirmed to Kathy by Dr. Crompton decades ago.
BUSTER says: So we can ignore Jason’s idiotic denials and accept that Sharon’s account of Monika’s phone call is exactly accurate and happened exactly as she said…
JASON says: Sorry, we don’t accept the lies that you peddle for your debunked hoax. There are no tapes of this phone call and we just don’t blindly believe Sharon Lawrence who is a confirmed liar. We want evidence this actually happened. The pills killed Jimi so all this drama that you and Sharon peddles is irrelevant.
BUSTER says: In a perfect world Sharon would come in here and rip Jason a new one, but short of that, more credible minds can accept Sharon’s account as accurate and realize Sharon got Monika to admit the wine in that phone call…By moaning for 20 seconds in to the phone Monika was telling the world that the wine was associated with something very painful in her mind…If we go to Sharon’s exact writing in her book she kind of fudges around asking Monika if she poured wine in to Jimi?…But there is no doubt that she got Monika to admit the wine Jason is doing sick denial trolling over…
JASON says: More fantasy from this wine troll. Sharon is a liar and she wouldn’t answer for all her lies. Not sure why you’re defending her so profusely when you attacked her on other sites. Jimi died from the 9 pills so all this drama is useless. No wine was found anywhere on Jimi during forensic analysis.
BUSTER says: That wine was obviously the same wine witnessed by multiple other witnesses…
JASON says: LMAO..This troll sure peddles his bullshit. There isn’t “multiple witnesses” who witnessed “wine”. No wine was ever witnessed at the flat. And most importantly, no wine was ever detected on the outside or the inside of Jimi’s body during the autopsy. That means there was no wine.
BUSTER says: What Jason isn’t intelligently or honestly articulating is the fact Sharon confronted Monika on the wine because Dr Bannister’s claim had become known through the Hendrix grapevine by the time of that 1995 phone call…
JASON says Bannister is a fraud who made up the fake wine claim to cover his own ass after Monika already stated she “wiped Jimi’s face with wine” in the book Electric Gypsy that Fraud Bannister read. Wine did not kill Jimi so this nonsense is irrelevant.
BUSTER says: Plus, Sharon herself had witnessed Jack Meehan tell her that Dr Thurston mentioned Jimi having a stomach full of wine in September 1970…It is quite clear that Sharon had some kind of knowledge that the wine was a significant factor in Jimi’s death and that is why she confronted Monika and told her off in that phone call…
JASON says: More of the same horseshit. Dr. Thurston never stated anything about a “stomach full of wine” cuz no wine was found during the autopsy. Kathy read the hospital report and no phony “procedures” or a “stomach full of wine” was ever documented. That means it didn’t happen. This is another fake claim Sharon Lawrence made up like Jimi was into the occult and obsessed with the number 9. it’s complete nonsense.
BUSTER says: That is the trouble with Sharon is, like Kathy, she doesn’t take the next necessary step and consider how Monika’s admitted wine relates to Dr Thurston’s…But there is no doubt for any intelligent person who is paying attention to all this that Sharon’s purpose in confronting Monika on the wine was to clear this up and make Monika aware that there were strong questions about the wine that people would hold her to – hence the moaning…Monika was dead less than a year later from this confrontation, and people do not end up dead over non-existent wine…
JASON says: More b.s. and a narration from this wine troll. No wine existed and it was never documented anywhere. Buster the clown can never produce evidence of wine. Only these same phony clams he parrots about moaning on the phone.
BUSTER says: Jason’s denial trolling is designed to gum up the discussion in entangling bullshit and trolling in order to avoid the evidence Jason is fully aware is true…
JASON says: There is no wine and it’s all a hoax. I’ve proven that since July. You gum up each site you troll at pushing your hoax until you get banned.
BUSTER says: That way he doesn’t have to admit Sharon got Monika to confirm the wine Siefert said was covering Jimi…
JASON says No wine was “covering Jimi”. No wine was witnessed “covering Jimi” by both ambulance and police men who viewed Jimi dead first. Dr. Bob Brown never witnessed any wine on Jimi. Dr. Teare never detected any wine on the outside or inside of his body during forensic analysis. That proved no wine existed. Fraud Bannister made up the wine in 1992.
BUSTER says: And once you confirm that wine you realize it has no place in any accidental death scenario where Jimi accidentally killed himself by taking too much Vesparax, as the Judas Glebbeek claimed…
JASON says: No imaginary wine has ever been confirmed. There is no documentation it and Teare never detected any wine. Dr. Teare confirmed Jimi died of barbiturate poisoning which was confirmed to Kathy Etchingham 20 years later by Dr. Rufus Crompton.
BUSTER says: What this does is make clear that Jimi would not allow himself to be soaked in wine if he were conscious, which means the wine ended up on and in Jimi after he lost consciousness…
JASON says: Jimi was never “soaked in wine” but you are debunking the false claim by your fraud pal Tappy Wright who said Jimi had pills and wine forced down his throat.
BUSTER says: Since the wine was administered after Jimi lost consciousness, and we have Dr’s Crompton and Thurston confirming Dr Bannister’s wine, we therefore have hard proof of homicide in this witnessing that none of Jason’s idiotic denial trolling can overturn or make go away…
JASON says: No wine was ever administered cuz no wine was ever documented in any report or analyzed during Jimi’s autopsy.
Buster is a pathological liar cuz Dr, Crompton never confirmed any wine. He clearly stated Jimi died from a toxic amount of barbiturates that Dr. Teare documented on the autopsy report.
Buster still hasn’t posted a statement from Dr. Crompton where Buster claims he said he “confirmed wine”. Buster can’t cuz Crompton never confirmed imaginary wine.
Thurston never confirmed any wine either cuz no wine was detected or documented in 1970.
Bannister made up the fake wine claim in 1992. .
BUSTER says: Jason hasn’t put a scratch on this and once anyone fills in all the evidence his trolling is ignoring it becomes clear.
JASON says: Only in your crazy and delusional mind. Your hoax has been debunked for months and you have no evidence for your phony claims and you never will. All you do is post your fake fantasy stories in your crazy deranged head.
Kathy got the confirmation she was looking for from Dr. Rufus Crompton who told her Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that poisoned his system and he could never survive. Katy wrote this in her book and you purposely leave it out to push your debunked wine hoax pretending it doesn’t exist. You are only fooling yourself cuz the evidence and the death is recorded forever in history and there’s nothing you can do about it. Your “wine murder” hoax is a fraud and it’s been thoroughly debunked.
The autopsy revealed no signs of violence internally or externally. This would suggest that Jimi was not murdered with wine forced down his throat but took the Vesparax willingly. Dr. Teare ruled out any suspicious scenario quite early in his report. The fluid in Jimi’s lungs is an obvious sign of a drugs overdose, and given Dr.Teare’s experience he would have recognised this. There is no getting round the fact that the detailed autopsy report made it very clear as to what caused Jimi’s death and it wasn’t murder by waterboarding with wine. Dr. Crompton confirmed Dr Teare’s findings of an overdose of barbiturates causing Jimi to choke on his own vomit. Jimi took a toxic dose of the Vesparax revealed through the examination of his body, and thorough analysis of his blood and urine. Given the absence of any great quantity of wine in or around Jimi at the autopsy it’s fair to say that Jimi was not murdered with wine but died as a result of taking a lethal dose of barbiturates.
JASON says: Here is an excerpt from a BBC interview Kathy Etchingham did after she released her book “Through Gypsy Eyes”. Kathy talks about Jimi, the last time she saw him, his death, and most importantly she doesn’t speak of wine or a phony “murder” that the wine hoaxer push.
When Jimi first arrived in London he drank only fruit juice. Later he and Etchingham enjoyed whisky and Coke and Mateus ros. But then Hendrix discovered cocaine, LSD – and finally heroin. It made him violent. “I’ve got a survival instinct,” says Etchingham, “I was going to carry on my life and not become a drug addict.”
All these hangers-on appeared,” Etchingham says. “They were dodgy, undesirable people, with an aggressive edge to them. I really didn’t like that atmosphere and it was the beginning of the end.”
Etchingham says that as drink and drugs took hold, Hendrix’s sweet character started to change. He would get nasty with people, she says, and he started smashing up hotel rooms.
“He started to look really rough. His hair was breaking off, he didn’t have healthy skin, he looked as if he’d aged 10 years in two and a half.”
Kathy Etchingham decided she had to move on and the couple split up in 1969.
She eventually left Hendrix because she couldn’t cope with the hedonistic rock’n’roll lifestyle. A devastated Hendrix moved into a suite in the Cumberland Hotel near Marble Arch.
By June, Etchingham had met and married her first husband but, with his permission, she remained involved with Hendrix. She saw him in Kensington Market, the day he died, looking haggard and prematurely grey.
“I bumped into him in Kensington antique market,” she says. “He was buying belts or scarves. And he sort of ‘squidged’ me and invited me over to his hotel.
“I said I might – but that was it. I never saw him again. The next morning he was dead.”
Hendrix had died after choking on his own vomit. Initially, Etchingham felt guilty about not going to visit him, but now, she says, she realises it probably wouldn’t have made any difference.
“To begin with, I thought that if I’d gone round, maybe it wouldn’t have happened. But then I realised we’d probably have had a drink and a chat, I’d have left and he’d still have done the same thing that happened that night.
“I wish that I’d gone round, but I didn’t and that’s all there is to it.”
Etchingham now lives abroad. She has written a memoir called Through Gypsy Eyes, after another Hendrix song that she inspired.
She wants Hendrix to be remembered not just as a guitar superhero, but also as a “really lovely person – a natural, normal human being”.
JASON says: Well, there you have folks, Kathy Etchingham said Jimi would have taken the strong Vesparax and died anyway even if she met up that evening. Kathy knows Jimi wasn’t murdered and this was published after she wrote her book talking to Dr. Crompton and doing the investigation. Kathy knows there was no phony “wine drowning” and she got the first hand information. Also, there is no evidence or wine witnessed at the flat or documented on record. Kathy saw it all and spoke to all the necessary people involved.
No wine folks. This is all a hoax. Kathy proved it again!
Hi Jason, What I dislike the most is trying to make Jimi look like some sort of victim in all of this. He took the Vesparax willingly after a night out with friends and landed in the apartment of a girl he hardly knew who failed to disclose, for whatever reason, the potency of the barbiturates. He was very trusting of her but that does not mean that she deliberately set out to harm him. Monika probably felt guilt over the circumstances of Jimi’s death having died in her apartment while having taken her sleeping pills. Her lawyer said that Monika never got over the fact that he died and that Jimi was the love of her life. She spent the rest of her life painting portraits of Jimi which covered the walls of her Seaford home, and which Kathy also commented on. She even went to greater lengths to prove that she was engaged to Jimi by having Al Hendrix sign a piece of paper stating just that. Kathy however always remained highly suspicious of Monika’s story of her involvement with Jimi and the circumstances of his death and this prompted her investigation into his death. The findings revealed that died Jimi of the barbiturates just like Dr.Teare wrote and reiterated by Dr. Crompton. The new investigation did not discover that Jimi was murdered with wine, and interestingly Kathy never believed he was murdered.
Hi Ivana,
Monika’s actions proved it since she dedicated her life to painting portraits of Jimi. No doubt she felt guilty of the pills she gave him which led to his tragic death. Which is why she acted the way he did.
Dr. Teare confirmed in 1970 that Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning and over 20 years later Dr. Crompton confirmed it again to Kathy which she wrote in her book. Buster the troll pathetically leaves that out trying to claim his imaginary wine that doesn’t exist.
There is no evidence of a phony “murder” and it was ruled out during the inquest. Also, all the professionals who witnessed the death scene never suspected a “murder”. They all witnessed a drug overdose scene and they all confirmed it in their testimony.
Jason only further proves his troll status above…Kathy was trying to disassociate herself with the drug scene and being connected to it through Jimi’s death, that’s all…That’s the problem with Kathy is she tried to mitigate and defuse the whole thing after Monika died in order to get out of it and have no more involvement…Women tend to do things like that…Shape the reality to fit their female needs…Once Monika died Kathy retreated to that position because there were a lot of people out there threatened by her knowledge…What Kathy is doing there is selling Jimi out in order to fit her personal need…If Kathy needs to betray and deny Dr Bannister in order to establish her comfort then she’ll answer to it like anyone else, Hendrix girlfriend or not…The bottom line is the forensic arguments I made (that trolling Jason never mustered any intelligent response to) are still the determining factor…After all, Kathy was the one who witnessed Dr Crompton say Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…
All I can say is Kathy’s opinion is not what Jason falsely spins here and that is coming from someone who has spoken to her extensively…Jason is once again seeking and dwelling in darkness to force his non-truth…
If I could have an interview with Kathy I could disprove her suggestion that Jimi was headlong for a drug death from his own actions…Her ignoring all the evidence for Jeffery’s involvement is a betrayal of Jimi by a female who thinks her status as Jimi’s girlfriend can be leveraged to shape reality – but it doesn’t work that way…Kathy has reached her break-off point for personal danger that’s all…Kathy’s logic on the Bruce Montalvo show was silly…She said “If someone had information they would have come forward back then”…That’s silly and ignores that people withhold information all the time because it is dangerous or legally incriminating…Kathy poo poo-ed the suggestion that Michael Jeffery was involved…Really bad move and definitely not working in Jimi’s interests…She would not have gotten away with that if I were the interviewer…
More useless ramblings and fantasy stories made up in “Buster’s” crazy head trying to spin his debunked hoax and still no documented evidence he can ever produce for his bogus claims.
BUSTER says: Jason only further proves his troll status above…
JASON says: Buster is the troll who was banned from many sites and forums for trolling and abusive posts for over a decade pushing this phony “Hendrix murder” hoax.
BUSTER says: Kathy was trying to disassociate herself with the drug scene and being connected to it through Jimi’s death, that’s all…
JASON says: Kathy investigated Jimi’s death and concluded he died from a lethal barbiturate overdose as told to her by Dr. Rufus Crompton. Not the phony wine clams you push for your hoax.
BUSTER says: That’s the problem with Kathy is she tried to mitigate and defuse the whole thing after Monika died in order to get out of it and have no more involvement…Women tend to do things like that…Shape the reality to fit their female needs…Once Monika died Kathy retreated to that position because there were a lot of people out there threatened by her knowledge…
JASON says: Buster adds his own phony interpretation and has no clue what he’s talking about. Kathy did an investigation and was satisfied with the results, as she learned from Jimi’s autopsy and Dr. Rufus Crompton that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him.
BUSTER says: What Kathy is doing there is selling Jimi out in order to fit her personal need…If Kathy needs to betray and deny Dr Bannister in order to establish her comfort then she’ll answer to it like anyone else, Hendrix girlfriend or not…
JASON says: What a fraudulent lie by this turd making up b.s. to peddle his debunked hoax. Kathy did an investigation and learned the facts that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates. No phony wine ever existed. Bannister is a fraud who lied about fake wine in 1992 to cover his own ass, but he ended up being convicted of 3 counts of fraud and struck off the medical register for life. Kathy read all the hospital reports and there was no phony “wine removal” documented which means it never happened. Dr. Teare confirmed Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning in 1970.
BUSTER says: The bottom line is the forensic arguments I made (that trolling Jason never mustered any intelligent response to) are still the determining factor…After all, Kathy was the one who witnessed Dr Crompton say Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…
JASON says: Your “forensic argument” is a total joke based merely on your own opinion that “Jimi couldn’t die from pills cuz he had a ‘famous tolerance’ to drugs so it has to be the wine”. Absurd b.s. and only a moron like you would peddle this nonsense for a decade. Real forensic analysis on Jimi’s body determined Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates which resulted in barbiturate poisoning which was told to Kathy by Dr. Rufus Crompton. None of your imaginary wine was ever found or documented. Your phony “forensics” has been debunked for good
BUSTER says: All I can say is Kathy’s opinion is not what Jason falsely spins here and that is coming from someone who has spoken to her extensively…Jason is once again seeking and dwelling in darkness to force his non-truth…
JASON says: All we can say is Buster’s opinion is a joke and not facts as he claim it to be. Kathy did an investigation and got the facts of how Jimi died which was from a lethal amount of barbiturates that was confirmed to be barbiturate poisoning in 1970. You’ve never spoken to Kathy in your life. Another bogus claim from this wine troll who claims to have had “private conversations” with all these people who reveal “incredible information” to him privately. Buster has mental issues as well as being a pathological liar.
BUSTER says: If I could have an interview with Kathy I could disprove her suggestion that Jimi was headlong for a drug death from his own actions…
JASON says: You couldn’t disprove anything cuz you’re a hoaxer and a pathological liar. Everybody who knew Jimi said he was headed for death with his abusing of drugs in his last few months. Even your fraud pal Tappy Wright said he was in a “downward spiral” with drugs.
BUSTER says: All I can say is Kathy’s opinion is not what Jason falsely spins here and that is coming from someone who has spoken to her extensively
BUSTER says: If I could have an interview with Kathy I could disprove her suggestion that Jimi was headlong for a drug death from his own actions
JASON says: Nice contradiction!
First, Buster the clown says he has “spoken to Kathy extensively”.
Then he says “If he could have an interview with Kathy”.
If Buster was pals with Kathy, and had many “extensive conversations” with her as he claims, wouldn’t he already had this “interview” with her? Why would Buster need to ask “If he could have an interview with Kathy? Since he is pals with her, as he claims, all he would have to do is call her up and talk. Buster is a pathetic liar and a fraud who makes crap up trying to sound “important” on the internet.
BUSTER says: Her ignoring all the evidence for Jeffery’s involvement is a betrayal of Jimi by a female who thinks her status as Jimi’s girlfriend can be leveraged to shape reality – but it doesn’t work that way…
JASON says: There is no “evidence” for any “involvement” by Jeffery. It’s all made up bogus after the fact clams of speculation, hearsay, innuendos, and outright lies from frauds like Tappy Wright. Kathy read Jimi’s contract and Jimi never fired Jeffery like you lied about for years since the contract had 2 1/2 more years. There was no “means or motive” and more of your phony hoax has been debunked.
BUSTER says Kathy has reached her break-off point for personal danger that’s all…
JASON says: Hilarious! Same bogus claim you always use. I guess no “personal danger” was looming for the lying frauds who made up bogus stories of wine that you use for your sources?
BUSTER says: Kathy’s logic on the Bruce Montalvo show was silly…She said “If someone had information they would have come forward back then”…That’s silly and ignores that people withhold information all the time because it is dangerous or legally incriminating…
JASON says: That’s how things work for a investigation. There is nothing “dangerous”. All you do is peddle bullshit claiming “danger”. You’re full of shit. The only frauds who “came forward” was the liars who cashed in on Jimi’s name for their fiction books. Fraud Bannister thought he was going to get sued for malpractice so he made up the fake wine claim. Fraud Bannister was still convicted for 3 counts of fraud and struck off the medical register for life.
BUSTER says: Kathy poo poo-ed the suggestion that Michael Jeffery was involved…Really bad move and definitely not working in Jimi’s interests…
JASON says: What’s not working in Jimi’s interests is this bullshit “murder hoax” that you’ve been peddling for a decade.
There was no “involvement” with Jeffery cuz Kathy did an investigation and Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that was confirmed by Dr. Rufus Crompton.
BUSTER says: She would not have gotten away with that if I were the interviewer.
JASON says: I would pay money to watch Kathy tell you off on tv and make you look like the clown troll you are. Buster would start yelling at Kathy on tv calling her a liar, murder denier, and a devil. Then Buster would claim he won the “debate” and slink off into the night.
Kathy is a matter-of-fact type of person who doesn’t beat around the bush and who speaks her mind. Without Wright and Bannister’s incredulous wine drowning story there is no murder scenario that is why this is being pushed to the forefront. Who would be silly enough to go against and ignore the real forensics of the day that determined that Jimi took a lethal dose of barbiturates and put their trust in others with no medical background whatsoever in order to make it look as if Jimi was murdered with wine. The fluid in Jimi’s lungs was caused by the overdose of the barbiturates and not by the presence of wine. Dr. Crompton reiterated Dr. Teare’s findings to Kathy and never stated that Jimi was murdered as the autopsy revealed no signs of internal or external trauma.
Don’t let the fact that the supposed murderer Michael Jeffrey was in another country get in the way of a conspiracy theory.
Hi Ivana,
Excellent post and you made perfect points. Don’t forget that Bannister was removed as a doctor for 3 counts of fraud making bogus claims about working on a rotting corpse, removing imaginary wine, and then dumping out non existent wine. Wright admitted he lied to sell his crappy book. And these are the “credible sources” these hoaxers use for their phony wine hoax. It’s hilarious.
Bring Kathy here and have her debate me directly…There are two liars in this thread who are ignoring that overdoses don’t cause lungs full of wine that take 20 minutes to suction out… There are two liars who are trying to switch the subject to their false spinning while ignoring that we’ve already proven the wine…Dr Thurston even confirmed the wine in the stomach to boot…
Buster claimed he was pals with Kathy and had “extensive conversations with her”. So, Buster should call up his “good pal” Kathy and she can tell him off.
There was no “lungs full of wine” or a phony 20 minute “suctioning”. Made up crap by Buster.
Kathy read the autopsy and hospital reports and never saw any phony treatments or wine. She said all these fake conspiracies are a bunch of bunk.
Dr. Thurston never confirmed any imaginary wine. That was a fake quote from Sharon Lawrence in her fiction book.
Dr. Teare and Dr. Crompton confirmed Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning.
Dr. Rufus Crompton directly told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that was above the toxic level in his body which ended up killing him. Crompton read over the autopsy report and no wine was ever detected anywhere inside or outside the body of Hendrix. So, all these phony wine claims were easily proven to be bogus. If Jimi was “drowned in wine” both inside and out, wine would have showed up in the autopsy and would have been documented. Dr. Teare found no wine in his thorough examination and Dr. Thurston never witnessed any wine himself and concluded Jimi died from an inhalation of vomit due to a drug overdose. Being intoxicated with drugs is an overdose since it is way above the prescribed amount.
So, Kathy doing a thorough investigation herself learned and soaked up all this information she was told and read in documents. If Jimi had all these so called phony “treatments” at the hospital performed by Fraud Bannister, then Kathy would have released this information to the public and used it for the investigation. None of these phony “treatments” ever happened. Kathy read all the reports, the important documents, and spoke to Dr Crompton confirming Jimi died from an overdose. This is why she refutes all these bogus murder conspiracies and said if she would have met up with Jimi the night before he died, he probably would have died anyway.
Next up, this is a repost of an excerpt of an article I posted before that deserves another mention. Fraudsters try to claim that Michael Jeffery had involvement in Jimi’s death, but if you actually studied the case, you would know all those claims are bogus. Kathy shoots down all those bogus claims for us and talks more about Jimi’s overdose below.
This innocents-in-paradise lifestyle was destined not to last. “It all started falling apart when they were in America on tour in 1968,” says Kathy. “Chas said he was his own worst enemy. Instead of getting on with making records, making money, he was just fooling around and laying down things that Chas didn’t think were commercial.”
When Chandler resigned, Hendrix associated with dubious characters and even shadier hangers-on who would lounge around the recording studio bringing in more drugs.
He was being followed around by horrible people who were giving him stuff,” says Kathy.
“When people are on drugs, they become somebody else. He aged so quickly. He was being overworked and he contributed to that by going into the studio and staying up all night. By 1969, I wanted something much more stable.”
Not only had he lost his mentor and his girlfriend but even Hendrix’s muse seemed to desert him. There was no Hendrix product in 1969, while 1970 brought only the flat, drab Band Of Gypsys concert album. Even as he assumed the position of world’s highest-paid stage performer, he was futilely chopping and changing band personnel. “Never gelled,” says Kathy of Hendrix’s post-Experience groups. “It obviously was not happening and he was getting more and more depressed about things. He was just bumbling along by 1970.”
September 18 of that year brought the shocking news of Hendrix’s death from a sleeping pill overdose. He was 27. Kathy later conducted extensive investigations into the chaotic circumstances surrounding Hendrix’s demise. “He fell into the hands of a crazy fan he met on the Tuesday. He was dead by Friday.”
Monika Dannemann gave Hendrix some powerful sleeping pills, which Kathy says she claimed were “very, very weak”.
“So of course, Jimi thinks: ‘I’ll take nine of these ‘cos I’ve taken some uppers’.”
Kathy dismisses a recent claim that Hendrix was murdered on the orders of Mike Jeffery to cash in on an insurance policy after Hendrix refused to renew his management contract. “I’ve seen the contract. It had two and a half more years to run.”
JASON says: So, Kathy Etchingham shoots down these fraudulent claims that Michael Jeffery had Jimi “murdered” or “murdered” Jimi himself. Kathy read over and witnessed Jimi’s contracts he had with Jeffery and 2 1/2 years were still left on the contract.
This means that Jimi didn’t fire Michael Jeffery which Monika Dannemann lied about “witnessing”, and most importantly, there was no “motive” for Jeffery to “murder” Jimi as these hoaxers claim. Kathy saw the contracts with her own eyes and learned the facts. Hoaxers can only talk about the fake claims of debunked fraudsters like Tappy Wright who lied to sell a crappy book that nobody was going to buy anyway. Kathy puts an end to these bogus “murder” claims.
Kathy also confirms for us that it was the pills that killed Jimi which was given to him by Monika Dannemann who claimed they were “weak”. Jimi was not used to taking pills of this magnitude since they were way more powerful than anything he ever took. Taking 9 of these pills plus the “black bomber” that he took earlier is what tragically did him in.
Even Kathy Etchingham stated that in this excerpt. Vesparax were extremely powerful pills and not like the other pills that Jimi took since they weren’t as potent. Jimi never had a tolerance to Vesparax since he never took them before. These pills combined with the wine he drank at Harvey’s and Kameron’s party, along with the “black bomber” intensified the Vesparax and slowed down his nervous system to the point it caused a severe reaction. That reaction caused the profuse vomiting preventing him from breathing which slowed down his reflexes of his body and cough reflex as well. That enabled him to be suffocated by the vomit since he was on his back. The difficulty in breathing made his heart work harder causing fluid to build up in his chest. This is the same effect for what happens to people who have a bad heart. So, none of this fluid was from the phony wine it was from Hendrix’s body shutting down rejecting the overdose of pills.
No wine was ever witnessed at the death scene by anybody. No wine was detected on Jimi’s body at the autopsy. No wine was ever detected anywhere inside Jimi during the autopsy. Nobody can ever prove this imaginary wine with documented evidence cuz it doesn’t exist. Kathy Etchingham did an extensive investigation and learned it was drugs that killed Jimi. That’s why she refutes all these bogus wine hoax and phony “murder” claims that has an entire cast of characters who are named as “killers”. When you have all these different “killers” from one post to the next you know it’s all a big fat joke.
Jason violates the rules of evidence…Therefore he loses…Denial trolls delude themselves that they and their lies control reality and when you have a reality issue that disproves you just keep spinning your lies and you can get around it…However credible debate and reality don’t work that way…
Jason violates the rules of evidence above because once Kathy confirmed that Dr Crompton said Jimi had lungs full of fluid upon arrival at St Mary’s Jason’s sick trolling game was over…That’s the wine and Jason knows it and it is pathetic seeing him abuse this comments section by trying to lie his way around it like he was trying to convince himself his lies were true…
You can see Jason itching to call Kathy and Crompton liars but he knows he’s used up his call everyone liars card a long time ago and it is blowing back on him because he looks like the silly nut he is who calls everyone liars once he gets cornered like a rat by the facts…Jason is ignoring that Crompton had equal credibility to the attending doctors because of his position at the London Coroner’s Office and that’s why Kathy went to him in the first place…So, drowning by lungs full of fluid takes precedent pathologically over drug overdose…Jason is just desperately fishing easy to refute lies because he’s caught and can’t admit it…But he violates the basic rules of evidence and medical science in public as well and that gives me an easy win…
This debate was over long ago when the sick troll Jason refused to honestly answer for Dr Siefert’s admission that Jimi was covered in red wine…Or the half hour treatment time and Unable To Resuscitate listed on the Hospital Report…
Nice try Jason but you met your match and bit off more than you could chew when you decided to denial troll this subject…
Hilarious how “Buster The Wine Troll” makes up his own phony rules for his “debate” just like he does for his fake wine hoax. This wine troll only blows hot air and can never post any real evidence.
We all know that there was no “wine” in Jimi’s lungs cuz there was no wine ever documented and Kathy read the autopsy report and knows no wine ever existed.
Buster wants to make up a phony claim of “wine in Jimi’s lungs” but can never produce any documented evidence of his fake wine.
Buster is a moron cuz fluid develops from a drug overdose when the victim is unable to breathe with the heart working harder and drugs are poisoning the system. That’s what happened to Jimi.
Dr. Crompton confirmed that to Kathy Etchingham but Buster the wine troll purposely leaves that out cuz he is a fraud perpetrating a debunked hoax.
Purposely leaving out documented forensic testimony like Buster the wine troll did isn’t going to help him win a “debate”. He will forever lose on real documented evidence and he knows it.
Hi Jason, When John Ridley directed that dumb movie starring Andre 3000 as Jimi Hendrix, Kathy went on a morning TV program to defend Jimi against allegations of domestic abuse shown in the film that never really happened. She did a similar thing when she gave an interview to a supposed friend that was then rewritten to make Jimi appear in a very negative light which she then received an apology from the newspaper in question. Kathy has gone way beyond the call of duty and she certainly would not be hood winked into believing a fake murder scenario or waste her time defending the allegations of a tin foil hatter. She has all the evidence she needs gained from that monumental investigation.
We all know Dr. Thurston never witnessed, documented, or confirmed any imaginary wine. Dr. Thurston said in explicit wording that Jimi “clearly died from an inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication”. Nowhere was wine ever mentioned about Jimi Hendrix in Thurston’s report. In fact, wine is never documented anywhere on any Hendrix medical report or autopsy report. All these fake wine claims are post 1992 after the fact claims which is why no documentation of wine exists from 1970. Wine was never present.
The only phony claim of Thurston and wine came from fiction writer Sharon Lawrence who has made up many fake quotes and claims in her garbage book. She confirmed that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide and then she makes up bogus quotes of wine that contradicts her suicide claim. Sharon said Jimi took 9 pills based on numerology to kill himself, and then she wants to lie about Thurston and wine that makes no sense. Jimi went through a full forensic analysis of his entire body to determine the cause of death. No stomach of wine was ever found which proves this liar Lawrence to be the same fraud as we know her as. The only thing discovered in Jimi’s stomach was undigested rice. No imaginary wine was ever found.
Dr. Thurston never made any public statement about wine. He is not on the offical record documented as stating there was wine. No other person on the face of the Earth can say that Thurston talked about wine and there were hundreds of reporters asking this man about “what happened to Jimi Hendrix?”. Not one of these reporters were ever told about wine from Thurston. This again proves Lawrence made up another bogus lie in 2001 cuz no documentation can be produced with Thurston stating there was wine. Thurston had his final say in his final report and he never said the word wine just like the ambulance men never did either.
Kathy Etchingham was told by Dr. Rufus Crompton that Jimi Hendrix died from a lethal and toxic amount of barbiturates that was toxic to his system. Crompton never said one word to Kathy about wine anywhere inside of Jimi Hendrix. Which is why Kathy refutes all the fake wine hoax claims cuz she did an investigation and got the real information that proved Jimi died from a drug overdose. These wine clowns put out bogus nonsense from frauds who make phony claims and not one of these people can produce any real documented evidence to prove their phony claims.
The fluid in Jimi’s chest did not contain any wine cuz no wine was ever detected in the forensic analysis of the fluid or inside Jimi’s body. Nothing about wine was ever documented in Teare’s autopsy results. Dr. Crompton only was reading what Teare wrote over 20 years earlier. Nothing about wine was ever documented by Teare, so Crompton could not confirm wine like these hoaxers claim, since he was just reading Teare’s autopsy report. No wine was ever documented anywhere in that report. Kathy knows that as well, which is why she clearly says in all her nterviews that Jimi died from a drug overdose. Wine frauds pathetically try to claim “fluid is wine”. Well, they have no documented evidence of wine and they can’t produce any cuz no wine ever existed. These frauds want to believe there was wine, but they never can prove it, and they cannot just make a bogus confirmation cuz they claim it exists.
Kathy Etchingham saw all the documents and necessary reports and she concluded there was no wine and Jimi Hendrix died from an overdose. If all this imaginary wine existed, then it would have been documented and known since 1970. No documentation of imaginary wine exists, and a case cannot be made based only on fake invented stories.
That’s all the hoaxers have are fake debunked claims.
Hi Ivana,
No wine was witnessed at the flat. That proves there was no “wine drowning”.
No wine was detected during the autopsy on Jimi’s body. That proves Jimi was not “covered in wine”.
No wine was detected during the autopsy inside Jimi’s lungs, stomach, or in the fluid in his chest. That proves Jimi was not “drowned in wine”.
No reports ever exist documenting wine.
The ambulance men, the police, Dr. Bob Brown, Dr. Teare, Dr. Thurston, and Dr. Crompton all verified and confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose.
Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that was well above the toxic level. Crompton never told Kathy about imaginary wine.
How can hoaxers claim imaginary wine when no documented evidence of this fake wine exists?
Hi Jason, Jimi was only 5ft 11in and a very slim build. I can’t imagine how he could hold five bottles of wine in him to start with like Bannister said. Why the need to stuff Jimi with pills; just the wine would have been enough to murder him. When anyone researches this story properly there can only be one outcome and it’s just like Dr. Teare’s autopsy report stated.
Ivana,
The 5 bottles of wine claim is bogus. All that wine would have been pouring out of his mouth when the ambulance men moved Jimi. Reg Jones told Kathy that the
vomit was dry on Jimi and the bed. John Saua said dry vomit was in his throat. Not one word about wine or wet vomit.
If Jimi was stuffed with pills like the fraud Tappy Wright said, then there would have been signs of trauma to Jimi’s body like bruises and cuts from a struggle. His teeth would have been broken too from forcing wine into him. Dr. Teare examined Jimi’s body and witnessed no wine on his body or hair like these fraudsters claim. He witnessed no trauma to the outside of Jimi’s body. There would also be trauma to Jimi’s throat, stomach, and lungs from being drowned in bottles of wine. Teare found nothing like that which proves no drowning happened. No wine was found anywhere on Jimi.
Also, there wouldn’t be all that vomit if he was drowned. The wine would have suffocated him and he would be dead. The pills wouldn’t even had a chance to work. That also proves no wine drowning happened. The vomit suffocated Jimi from the reaction to pills and he was on his back and that killed him. A drowning would be completely different than the overdose Jimi died from.
Kathy read Teare’s autopsy report he wrote on Jimi and she saw nothing with wine on it. Kathy took the report to Crompton and he told her the pills killed Jimi which were toxic to his system. Teare did a full body forensic analysis on Jimi and no wine was found on him or flooded inside his lungs or stomach. The pint of fluid contained no wine. The fluid built up from his restricted beathing and his heart working too hard from the drugs. A classic case of a drug overdose. If you compare Jimi’s real death to other drug overdoses you get the same results. Nobody can argue against that.
.
Hi Jason, It just amazes me who tin foil hatters place their trust in with this story; Wright with his made up murder with wine bogus story and Bannister the fraudulent doctor. The real forensics are glossed over in favour of fantasy scenarios that took place in people’s minds and no where else. All the doctors recognised that Jimi had been dead for a good while and this was another drugs overdose. If anyone had come forward, like Monika, in casualty that morning then Dr. Seifert would not have needed to wait for Gerry Stickells to identify the body. If any of the personnel suspected murder then the authorities would have been notified promptly but no such thing was ever determined, not by the ambulance officers, the police, the doctors or Dr.Teare. If it was murder then Dr. Thurston would have questioned the findings of the autopsy report and given a different verdict.
Carlos Santana made an interesting observation and comment about Jimi and the hedonistic lifestyle of the sixties. “To me, it was a combination of the lifestyle- staying up all night, chicks, too much drugs, all kinds of stuff. It was a combination of all the intensities he felt, along with a lack of discipline. In the rock style of life at the time, there was no discipline.”
So, did Ted Nugent in 1970 who warned Jimi to quit drugs after he offered Ted some.
Hi Ivana,
Don’t forget Sharon Lawrence who made up the fake Dr. Thurston quote that tin foil hatters use for their hoax.
Tin foil hatters claim a “homicide” by wine and not one medical attendant or police man witnessed anything of that nature. Dr. Teare found nothing that resembled foul play. Teare and Thurston were the best in their field and could tell what an overdose looked like during an autopsy.
Good point about Siefert waiting for Jimi to be identified.
Also, the hospital said Jimi was dead on arrival and died from an overdose. Nothing about the phony wine. Tin foil hat kooks ignore that.
Dr. Thurston clearly stated: “The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication, but there is no evidence as to intention to commit suicide.”
Then we have lying Sharon Lawrence in 2001, making up fake claims and quotes in her fiction book saying Jimi committed suicide and then again with Dr. Thurston, claiming he told a colleague of her’s that Jimi Hendrix was “fairly imbibed with wine”.
This is a bogus claim cuz Thurston never documented anything about wine in his final report. Dr. Teare did a full examination of Jimi’s stomach and found undigested rice from the meal he ate earlier. There was nothing documented about large amounts of wine inisde his stomach or that large amounts of wine was removed by Fraud Bannister.
Hoaxers want to tell tales of wine, but never have any documented evidence to prove except for decades later phony after the fact claims. If there was all this wine, as they claim, it would have been documented and known in 1970. No wine was ever witnessed or found. This is all a hoax and it’s been debunked.
Hi Jason, I’ve been reading all the ways Jimi was supposed to have died- waterboarding with wine, suicide with nine pills to coincide with the 18th September because of his belief in the occult, accidental death by swallowing a toxic dose of barbiturates, murdered by all sorts of unscrupulous people passing through London on that particular date, and killed with a large amount of wine by his manager and his then girlfriend. Funny thing about Sharon Lawrence is that she is mentioned very briefly in biographies and mainly in terms of her court appearance in Toronto as a witness for Jimi. Apart from her journalistic background I really don’t think she had a close relationship with Jimi. She interviewed Monika after Jimi died and took a dislike to her because Monika was more interested in discussing her paintings rather than Jimi’s death. Sharon was just another reporter doing her job in London and might have exaggerated her friendship with Jimi.
Hi Ivana,
Always some phony theory how each hoaxer wants to make their “fake murder” claim. The “London thugs” claim was the best one. They were just passing by with bottles of wine and happened to know Jimi took a bunch of pills , so they burst through the door and poured bottles of wine down his throat and left into the night.
Sharon exaggerated a lot over the years and mostly outright lies for her fiction book. A lot of people who worked in the business claimed to be “great friends” with musicians but were merely acquaintances or met maybe once. Most of what she wrote doesn’t sound like she was that close with Jimi and she just made it up. She couldn’t even correctly state where Jimi was born. How could she get that wrong? Here’s what she wrote about Jimi in her fiction book about his state of mind during his last few days.
“His face was ashen and his brown eyes appeared exhausted and even frightened. Newer had I seen him like this. “Sharon…” he said. “Oh Sharon.” He gazed at me and he muttered, “I”m Almost gone.”
That sounds all made up. Others who were around Jimi, stated he was happy and in good spirits ready to tour Europe and get back to New York to finish recording his upcoming album. Bob Levine called Michael Jeffery in Spain the day before Jimi died to set up recording time in the studio.
Then from there Sharon makes up her occult nonsense and taking 9 pills based on numerology.
Supposedly Jimi took 9 pills cuz September is the 9th month. He took them on the 18th cuz 9 Vesparax pills were 18 times the amount of one. I’m sure Jimi knew that information before he took them lol….Like I said just a bunch of fiction and gullible suckers believe this garbage.
Here is an excerpt from The Washington Post when Sharon Lawrence’s fiction book came out. Notice that nothing about wine was mentioned, only Hendrix being stoned and choking on his own vomit which Ambulance Man Reginal Jones testified to. This is also before Tappy Wright made his fraudulent claims against Michael Jeffery. The imaginary wine is a hoax.
“Lawrence sometimes can’t help but break her usually measured tone. When Monika Dannemann suggested meeting for tea in 1991, Lawrence writes, “I sooner would have stuck my head in the oven.” Dannemann, after all, had been with the stoned Hendrix the night he died from choking on his own vomit; she stalled instead of calling immediately for an ambulance and falsely claimed to be his fiancee. Lawrence also rolls her eyeballs at Hendrix’s manager, Michael Jeffery, whom she considers unscrupulous. But her loyalty to Hendrix and these people’s troubling relationships with him, which have been discussed in other books as well, make these distracting breaks in tone forgivable.”
Jason would quickly lose a court case on this because the fact Dr Thurston was not present at the autopsy yet spoke about Jimi having obviously imbibed a large amount of wine means he heard it from somebody who confirmed it…Jason is trying to discredit Sharon Lawrence in order to deny Dr Thurston’s comment…However in court what would happen is subpoenas would be issued and Meehan’s archive would be accessed in order to confirm the comment…Sharon would also receive subpoenas and produce her written notes from 1970 proving she heard Meehan say it at the time…This discovery would show Jason to be the pathetic snivelling denial weasel he is who is seeking cheap denial by calling people liars…The typical tactic of an internet denial troll who takes advantage of the lack of legal discovery on the internet in order to hide behind lack of information and deception…Any court room level of investigation would quickly prove Sharon’s claim to be true and Jason’s denial to be demented trolling…
It’s obvious that what Jason is desperate to deny here is once Dr Crompton told Kathy Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid we are past the point of no return as far as evidence…There’s no jury that would rule otherwise…Jason responds to what a jury would do by turning up the trolling, but he’s obviously avoiding giving an honest answer to how that jury would respond to the predominant facts I’ve shown…The truth Jason is obviously avoiding is that Crompton confirmed the wine in the lungs and Thurston confirmed the wine in the stomach…Once you combine that with the wine Dr Siefert witnessed covering Jimi Jason and his trolling excuse-making become obvious for what they are and don’t work to overcome or refute the preponderance of the evidence for the wine…The half hour on the Hospital Report then further seals it…
In his denial Jason is refusing to see what we have here is also proof of a cover-up because Thurston was required to reveal the wine and its conflict with the blood alcohol level and Crompton was required to investigate drowning of the lungs with fluid and input it in to the forensics and autopsy…
More nonsense from this fool narrating a fantasy story cuz he has no real evidence to post. Just the same old debunked phony claims.
BUSTER says: Jason would quickly lose a court case on this because the fact Dr Thurston was not present at the autopsy yet spoke about Jimi having obviously imbibed a large amount of wine means he heard it from somebody who confirmed it…Jason is trying to discredit Sharon Lawrence in order to deny Dr Thurston’s comment…However in court what would happen is subpoenas would be issued and Meehan’s archive would be accessed in order to confirm the comment…Sharon would also receive subpoenas and produce her written notes from 1970 proving she heard Meehan say it at the time…This discovery would show Jason to be the pathetic snivelling denial weasel he is who is seeking cheap denial by calling people liars…The typical tactic of an internet denial troll who takes advantage of the lack of legal discovery on the internet in order to hide behind lack of information and deception…Any court room level of investigation would quickly prove Sharon’s claim to be true and Jason’s denial to be demented trolling…
JASON says: Buster would be convicted of fraud by a judge and jury for pushing a debunked hoax and not being able to produce documented evidence for his phony claims.
Sharon Lawrence confirmed in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide. The phony wine claims she made up is contradictory and irrelevant. Thurston never documented anything about wine in his report nor did he ever talk about wine to the hundreds of reporters who was asking him about Jimi Hendrix. He certainly isn’t going to tell one obscure reporter, Jack Meehan, about “wine” when it never existed. This is a phony after that fact claim by Sharon Lawrence and she got caught making up another lie in her fiction book. Sharon Lawrence would commit perjury again if she went to court with all the lies and made up quotes in her fiction book.
BUSTER says: It’s obvious that what Jason is desperate to deny here is once Dr Crompton told Kathy Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid we are past the point of no return as far as evidence…There’s no jury that would rule otherwise…Jason responds to what a jury would do by turning up the trolling, but he’s obviously avoiding giving an honest answer to how that jury would respond to the predominant facts I’ve shown…The truth Jason is obviously avoiding is that Crompton confirmed the wine in the lungs and Thurston confirmed the wine in the stomach…Once you combine that with the wine Dr Siefert witnessed covering Jimi Jason and his trolling excuse-making become obvious for what they are and don’t work to overcome or refute the preponderance of the evidence for the wine…The half hour on the Hospital Report then further seals it…
JASON says: Buster would be convicted of fraud by a jury of his peers for making up blatant lies of his imaginary wine.
Dr. Crompton never confirmed any imaginary wine cuz no wine was ever documented on Jimi’s autopsy report by Dr. Teare. Crompton read that report by Teare and told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him.
Buster is a pathological liar claiming imaginary wine that doesn’t exist.
Thurston never confirmed any imaginary wine in Jimi’s stomach cuz Dr. Teare never found wine in Jimi’s stomach, Teare only found undigested rice.
Dr. Teare never found any wine covering Jimi Hendrix during the forensic analysis of Jimi’s body during the autopsy.
No “half hour” hospital report exists cuz Kathy Etchingham viewed all the hospital and autopsy reports and there was no phony “procedures” ever recorded. If there was, Kathy would have released this information in her book.
Just more blatant lies from this wine troll with no documented evidence.
BUSTER says: In his denial Jason is refusing to see what we have here is also proof of a cover-up because Thurston was required to reveal the wine and its conflict with the blood alcohol level and Crompton was required to investigate drowning of the lungs with fluid and input it in to the forensics and autopsy…
JASON says: There is no “cover up” cuz there was no wine. Buster claims a “cover up” cuz all the real evidence will forever debunk the hoax he peddles.
Get over it Buster; this is so old news. Dr. Crompton said no such thing about the wine please read what he told Kathy about Jimi’s chances of survival with that toxic liver, and Dr.Thurston’s acceptance of Dr Teare’s autopsy results. The lungs full of fluid is a classic sign of a drugs overdose and not a sign that Jimi had wine poured into him. That fluid you push time and time again would only amount to half a litre and would never produce 5 bottles of worth of wine. Jimi’s death was a case of taking too many sleeping pills without thinking about the consequences from a woman he knew little about who he had a row with hours before, went to a party without, and then returned to her hotel. Jimi made some bad decisions that night and unfortunately these cost him his life.
Jimi tried to get Devon Wilson to accompany him back to the Samarkand after Monika buzzed to pick him up but she was in her usual drug stupor. Jimi probably needed a backup after he witnessed Monika’s behaviour at Harvey’s place and I think Jimi understood that these two women disliked each other after their jealous exchange at Ronnie Scott’s club. It seemed like a ploy to get back at Monika for her verbal abuse of Jimi earlier. Monika claimed that Jimi attended Kameron’s party only to tell Devon to stay away from Monika but this seems unlikely as Jimi had known Devon for a long time and had only been with Monika for a few days. Eric Burdon described Monika as a stalker type who became obsessed with Jimi after meeting him in Dusseldorf in 1969 and then travelled to London in August 1970 in the hope of seeing him again. When Monika telephoned her brother in Germany she told him that Jimi wanted to sleep for a day and a half and that is the reason he took so many of her pills. For whatever reason Monika failed to disclose the potency of the Vesparax, and as Noel Redding suggested she did not stop him from taking them. However Jimi took those pills willingly swallowing a lethal dose of barbiturates that caused him to pass out immediately on top of the bed fully clothed, and caused his death in 1970.
Buster still has no evidence for his bogus claims.
And he never will, Jason.
He certainly won’t cuz he will always have nothin’.
Kathy Etchingham already conducted an extensive investigation into Jimi’s death in the early 90’s and found no evidence of imaginary wine, no phony “half hour treatments”, no evidence of Dr. Thurston talking about wine (since no wine ever existed), or this fake “cover up” Buster the clown pushes cuz he has no evidence for his bogus claims.
All these bogus claims are after the fact claims that have no evidence or merit. Kathy read and looked at Jimi’s hospital medical files and the autopsy report. No wine or phony “half hour treatments” were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix or were ever documented. That means it did not happen since hospitals document everything. Kathy calls all these phony hoax claims “bunk”.
Kathy Etchingham debunks lying Sharon Lawrence cuz the investigation proved Jimi did not commit suicide and proved that no wine ever existed in Jimi’s death. Sharon Lawrence lied about both and printed both false claims a few years later in her debunked fiction book.
Sharon Lawrence debunks and discredits herself cuz she can’t first state Jimi committed suicide with pills and then claim imaginary wine when she has no documented evidence of it. Jimi can’t be dead from his own suicide and then wake up from the dead to be “murdered by wine” after. A man can’t die two different and separate deaths in the same morning. Buster the clown has no answer for this except for his usual dancing around the issue with his phony narration like he was there in person.
Kathy Etchingham was satisfied after she spoke with Reginal Jones who told her Jimi died from a drug overdose. Jones never witnessed any wine at the flat. Hard to have a “wine drowning” when no wine was witnessed or existed at the death scene. Only dry vomit was witnessed by Reginal Jones. When dry vomit only covered Jimi, he could not
be “covered in wine”. No wine was detected on Jimi’s body during the autopsy.
Kathy Etchingham was satisfied after she spoke with Dr. Rufus Crompton who told her Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that was toxic to his system that killed him. Dr. Teare confirmed Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning. This is documented evidence that was forensically analyzed by Dr. Teare and read by Crompton in that same report.
Kathy Etchingham knows Jimi wasn’t murdered and died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him cuz she wrote it in her book and the investigation gave her closure.
Buster the clown did no investigation, saw no hospital reports, saw no autopsy report, did not speak to the ambulance men, police, Dr. Crompton, or Dr. Siefert. Buster only reads fiction out of garbage books where he claims that makes him “The #1 World’s Biggest Jimi Hendrix Authority”. Buster concots his fake murder scenario with his own personal opinion and his bogus made up “forensic timeline” as he trolls websites on the world wide web for a decade getting banned and laughed off forums all along the way.
Hi Jason, The doctors in casualty would have seen many patients who were involved in accidents, victims of crimes or drug and alcohol intoxications. These experienced professionals would have realised what they were dealing with when Jimi was brought in. None of them suspected that Jimi was a murder victim when he was brought in dead as did the ambulance attendants and the police at the Samarkand that morning as Jimi had the tell tail sign of a drugs overdose. If they suspected foul play then they would have treated this scenario differently. Can you imagine witnessing all that supposed wine and then treating this as a drugs overdose. The autopsy confirmed that Jimi’s death was drugs related, and reiterated years later by Dr. Crompton to Kathy during her investigation.
Hi Ivana,
That’s how “Buster” wants to portray his phony hoax. We have a drug overdose by Jimi Hendrix and Buster wants to push his phony wine hoax based on denying the drugs that killed Jimi and inserting imaginary wine.
Buster creates this fantasy scenario where he claims all this wine existed but then makes bogus excuses for why nobody at the flat witnessed it. Then he still claims “multiple people” witnessed this imaginary wine. It’s a total sham.
John Saua and Reg Jones confirmed it was a drug overdose in their testimonies. They never stated anything about a “murder” “homicide” or “gallons of wine” on Jimi or the bed. Jones told Kathy he witnessed dry vomit. Nothing wet or anything that resembled wine he never even mentioned.
If Officer Smith witnessed all this “wine” he would have sealed off the flat for a crime scene. The reason he didn’t cuz it was a routine drug overdose like he said it was. Smith even stated that if Monika was there he wouldn’t have even been called. The only reason he was called cuz nobody was there.
That’s another reason why this hoax is a sham This was treated as a drug overdose in 1970 cuz it was. Even St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed to the media Jimi died from a drug overdose. The autopsy proved it as well when it was determined by Dr. Teare that Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning. Crompton confirmed it again to Kathy 20 years later. After Fraud Bannister made his phony wine claims in 1992, the hoaxers try to treat this as a “wine murder drowning” but it doesn’t work cuz all the real evidence refutes them and they have no evidence to prove except for phony claims. That’s why their hoax doesn’t work and why there was no “wine claims” in the 70’s or 80’s. It’s all after the fact post 1992 claims when Fraud Bannister started it. Pushing a phony wine drowning when it was a drug overdose doesn’t work cuz all the phony claims are easily debunked.
Buster likes to make up fraudulent claims of “wine” and “homicide” regarding Jimi Hendrix but never has any evidence to prove what he claims. Buster makes up any ridiculous bogus claim for his hoax, but he never provides real documented evidence. He pretends it is a fact while he continues to repeat that same lie over and over. That’s how Buster aka Brian Doyle runs his fraudulent hoax. He’s been doing it for 10 years. Buster never can provide any documented evidence for the garbage he peddles, just like the ridiculous crap he wrote below. Now is Buster’s big chance to produce some real documented evidence for what he claims. Are you up for the task Buster? Can you do it? We will see.
Don’t hold your breath folks, you will die from a lack of oxygen, cuz we will never see any documented evidence from this wine clown troll. Everything Buster posts comes straight out of his fiction books or the fantasy nonsense he makes up in his crazy deranged head.
BUSTER says: The truth Jason is obviously avoiding is that Crompton confirmed the wine in the lungs and Thurston confirmed the wine in the stomach.
JASON says: Buster has no idea what the word “truth” means since all he does is post made up lies. Here is another perfect example, as Buster lies about confirmation of “wine in the lungs” and “wine in the stomach” by two doctors that never confirmed this non existent wine. Buster lies telling us both these two doctors fully confirmed “wine” when they never did. No wine ever existed, no wine was ever documented, no wine was ever confirmed by Dr. Thurston or Dr. Crompton.
Buster is telling us that Dr. Crompton confirmed “Jimi had wine in his lungs”. So, let’s see that confirmation from Dr. Rufus Crompton. Buster, post a documented statement from Dr. Rufus Crompton confirming Jimi had “wine in his lungs”.
Buster is also telling us that Dr. Gavin Thurston confirmed Jimi “had wine in his stomach”. So, let’s see a documented report from Dr. Thurston in his own words where he confirmed from 1970 that Jimi “had a stomach full of wine”.
Since our wine troll “Buster” says it’s been confirmed by both doctors, then surely he can post documented evidence from both of these doctors in their own words making these official statements on the official record.
Let’s go “Buster”….start posting these confirmations you claim were stated by these two doctors. It can’t be too difficult since you say both were confirmed. If you can’t post these statements, then you’re confirming to us that you are the wine troll hoaxing fraud we all know you as.
Hi Jason, can you imagine the mess all that wine would have made to the surroundings; it would have been everywhere on the bedding, the carpet, the walls, the furniture funny how the attendants that morning failed to notice that and didn’t tell anyone and only saw dried vomit. Kathy’s investigation was about determining what occurred that morning because Monika kept changing her story and why it took five hours to call the ambulance. Kathy never bought into this rubbish about Jimi being murdered and the investigation proved that Jimi died because he took too many of Monika’s sleeping pills.
Hi Ivana,
That’s exactly what I’ve been saying, with all that wine claimed by the hoaxers it would be all over the place and would be the first thing described by the witnesses who was there. The fact that nobody mentioned wine at all means it never existed.
Buster lied and claimed the bed was soaked in gallons of “pure wine”. Any person who was in that flat would have witnessed this “gallons of pure wine” on the bed. Police are trained to notice this stuff too. Not one person ever mentioned the word wine in any testimony. Only dry vomit was described and Reginal Jones clearly said it was dry when he spoke to Kathy. Never once did Jones or anybody mention alcohol who was at the flat.
After I called Buster out on that, like the troll he is, he claimed “super absorbent bedding” soaked up all the wine.
Well, the forensic analysis done on Jimi’s body at the autopsy detected no wine on him or inside him.
Doctor Brown witnessed no wine on Jimi either and he was the first Doctor to see Jimi at the hospital.
So, no wine at the flat, no wine at the hospital, no wine at the autopsy proves there was no wine.
Also, St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed on 9/18/70 that Jimi died from a drug overdose. They never issued a statement that Jimi was “drowned in wine” and “covered in wine” cuz it never happened.
Kathy dismisses all these bogus “murder” claims cuz she did investigation and got the answer from Crompton that she needed. Kathy blames Monika for her actions, and rightly so, cuz it was her pills that killed Jimi.
Hi Jason, I’m sure hospitals and aged care facilities would love to know where they can buy some of that super absorbent bedding for their incontinent patients. LOL.
Before the inquest into Jimi’s death Monika flew home to Germany where she was photographed in her flat looking very happy despite having lost her fiancée weeks earlier as Tony Brown remarked in his book. This alone says a lot about what sort of relationship she really had with Jimi. No one had heard of her before Jimi died in her flat and Jimi never mentioned this supposed engagement to any of his band members. In fact she had relationships with other black musicians before Jimi. David Henderson noted in his book that Monika had unrealistic expectations of her relationship with Jimi hoping to marry him, have children and settle in England permanently something she says would have occurred if Jimi hadn’t died. However friends of Jimi cast doubt on this by stating that Jimi would never have considered marriage to someone like Monika. I think Monika did not want to be seen as just another groupie so she concocted this fantasy /serious relationship with Jimi. In an interview she remarked that she was different from the other girls in Jimi’s life? Her fall out with Kathy where Monika accused her of being an inveterate liar about her long term relationship with Jimi lead to the judge establishing that it was Kathy who had the real relationship with Jimi and not Monika. Days later Monika committed suicide. Glebbeek and Shapiro described Monika as fragile in their book, others as someone stuck in the past unable to move on and a life wasted.
Here’s a short article on Ted Nugent and his experience with Jimi Hendrix. Nugent certainly doesn’t endorse the phony “murder by wine” hoax that’s been peddled by wine hoaxers.
Nugent: ‘I Warned Hendrix To Give Up Drugs’
Rocker Ted Nugent has revealed he tried to ween guitar great Jimi Hendrix off drugs in the months before he died in 1970.
The Cat Scratch Fever star experienced the extent of his hero’s drug intake during a jam session with the tragic star backstage at a concert – when he was offered all manner of narcotics.
But he didn’t want to ruin the moment, so he declined – and went on to become a drug-free rocker after seeing so many greats become “drooling and puking” dead men.
He says, “I saw how they got to the drooling, puking, and dying thing and I went, ‘I think I’ll avoid the drooling puking and dying shit’.
“I got to jam in a dressing room with Jimi Hendrix… and I said, ‘Jimi, I don’t want any of your dope and I don’t want any of your drugs because I’m digging what you’re playing and I’d like to be able to dig what you’re playing.’
“I could give you a list of guys… that I told them they were gonna die if they kept doing this stuff – and they all did die.”
Hi Jason, and……Alan Wilson, Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, Mama Cass, Brian Jones, Bon Scott, Keith Moon- the list goes on. Noel Redding remarked that everyone took from Jimi and the only thing they gave were drugs. Unfortunately both Mitch and Noel died relatively young because of their habits it seems.
That is very true.
Also, here is an important point. All the people who really knew Jimi Hendrix well knows he died from an overdose and ignore these bogus conspiracies.
It’s only the frauds and the wannabes who make up this garbage to make money for their crappy books that would never sell unless a “blockbuster revelation” is used for a hook. Even with their phony hook their crappy book never sold well.
Each fraud makes up their own bogus conspiracy that’s easily debunked.
Buster the fantasist writes more fantasy about his “hero” Sharon Lawrence on this site profusely defending her and her lies. But oddly enough, Buster has attacked Sharon on other websites. Can we say a hypocrite and a fraud? Yes, that description fits “Buster” like a glove as he shows off more of his ignorance and hypocrisy for us.
BUSTER says: Sharon would also receive subpoenas and produce her written notes from 1970 proving she heard Meehan say it at the time.
JASON says: Yeah, Sharon was just scribbling away on her notepad in 1970 when Jack Meehan was telling her all this “blockbuster information” he was “told” from Dr. Gavin Thurston about Jimi being “imbibed with wine” that he never told another living breathing soul on the face of the Earth. Thurston would only tell an obscure reporter named Jack Meehan this “blockbuster information”, and none of the hundreds of other reporters who was asking him questions about Jimi, so Meehan could run with this story to tell Sharon Lawrence who would wait 31 years for it to pop back in her head so she could add it to her fiction book. Neither one of them who were reporters bothered to report this “blockbuster information” in 1970 when this “huge secret revelation was made” and we had to wait 31 years for Sharon to spill the beans. What a crock. This is a bogus after the fact claim made up by Lawrence in 2001 just like her occult b.s. that she said Jimi was obsessed with.
This whole claim from Lawrence and “Buster” is a joke. Thurston never found or documented any wine in Jimi’s stomach. So, that’s why this phony claim is a lie. Sharon expects us to believe that Thurston wouldn’t document wine in his final report and only tell Meehan on the sly and nobody else on Earth. Then Meehan would go running to Sharon Lawrence to tell her as she “ferociously scribbles down her notes” while both reporters never say a peep to anybody. Buster then can claim his phony “cover up” claiming “Thurston knew about wine but covered it up”. Well, if Thurston was taking part in a “cover up” he certainly wouldn’t be blabbing “top secret” information to obscure reporter named Jack Meehan. That’s why this whole nonsense is ridiculous and is for gullible morons to believe and to repeat.
BUSTER says: This discovery would show Jason to be the pathetic snivelling denial weasel he is who is seeking cheap denial by calling people liars.
BUSTER says: Siefert is lying.
JASON says: Another hypocritical contradiction from our wine troll “Buster” who accuses others of doing the same exact thing he does. Buster is the ultimate hypocrite.
Buster calls Siefert a liar for his cheap denials but gets angry when I point out the obvious lies from his fraud sources: Sharon Lawrence, Tappy Wright, and Fraud Bannister.
Yes folks, Buster is a clown and a hypocrite that we all just laugh at for being ridiculous.
Jack Meehan died in 1973.
Dr. Gavin Thurston died in 1980.
Both men have been dead for decades and can’t be contacted to refute what Sharon Lawrence wrote about them in her fiction book.
That’s why she used them and it’s only her word giving a second hand account of what she claims Meehan was told. The classic way a conspiracy theorist who makes up fake stories operates. Claim somebody else told you important information that was told to them by somebody else. Use a dead person so they can’t refute the lie. Sharon followed that same exact formula right down to a T.
No wine was found during the autopsy. Thurston confirmed it was an overdose.
Lawrence is a liar.
Exactly Jason. Conspiracy theories can’t be verified because most of the people are dead. Have you noticed how there is always some outrageous or offbeat claim made in order to sell books. The government is nearly always mentioned so the conspiracy sounds legitimate but I’m sure if anyone rang the FBI they would hang up. There is more information to be had on the internet about anyone than on any agency file. Nothing is secret anymore people post on Facebook all the time with personal information. Bob Dylan would have appeared more subversive than Jimi with his lyrics yet he is still alive and producing music decades later. Tin foil hatters hope their stories are believed so that others spread the information; the more the better. But all they really do is spread false information, misleading information and fake news. The wine drowning story came about because of Wright’s book which has since been debunked ending up in the bargain basement bin but it’s info is still being peddled by tin foil hatters as the truth. Jimi died from an overdose of sleeping pills and not by having wine poured into him just like we have both been saying.
The outrageous claim isn’t even the main point of the book but it’s added to entice the person to buy it like Wright’s crappy book. That’s true about personal info being posted all the time.
Edwin Starr sang “War” in 1970 and he was controversial. Nobody drowned him in wine when he objected to Vietnam with a protest Anthem. Look at David Crosby who spoke out against the war and government publicly on stage at concerts. He’s still alive today.
Hoaxers aren’t even sure of their own phony “murder” plot. They say Jeffery killed Jimi in an act of revenge but then they claim the government also killed him. Then to spice up the hoax, they make Jeffery a “Super Secret Agent” who wields massive power threatening everybody for a “cover up” which they say still continues to this day decades after Jeffery died. Buster even said Dannemann was a top secret spy. Can you believe that? That’s hilarious.
That’s exactly what the tin foil hat hoaxers do. They don’t care how ridiculous their claim is just as long as they push the “murder” angle and can use their fraud sources for reference to keep the hoax going.
Their hoax always works against them since no wine was ever detected or documented. That’s why they work so hard making up fake scenarios for their phony wine. They claim all this massive wine but it was never reported or documented. Then they make the “cover up” claim with the government like you said adding to the hoax. But as usual, no evidence is ever published, only a phony narration of bogus plots of fiction. Forensic evidence proved Jimi’s overdose and hoaxers can’t refute it.
Jason is full of shit…He’s just an internet troll who decided to troll this subject when he saw it in this thread for the first time…
Jason is easy to beat because he is just ignoring evidence and responding by trolling his own denier one-sided spin…
The reason he is easy to beat is because a jury would look at Jason promoting Kathy Etchingham saying Jimi overdosed but would then realize that Kathy also said Dr Crompton said Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…That jury would look at Jason dishonestly trying to hide the fact that is a major conflict that he can’t explain so he tries to deceive the readers by BS-ing around it…That jury would look at Jason’s sick trolling and insulting of the readers’ intelligence and rule that he is full of shit and a lying scumbag with no respect for the readers or the truth..
Kathy obviously would not lie about Crompton saying Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid because Crompton could have confirmed it back then…Jason cannot promote or cherry-pick quotes from Kathy that he likes and ignore others that disprove his false spin…It just doesn’t work that way and a jury would be right on Jason’s crazy lying ass…
So what Jason has ignored and failed to answer in public is that Crompton’s drowning of the lungs in fluid takes forensic precedence over Jason’s false overdose that never happened and he doesn’t have proof for…Jimi never overdosed…He died by drowning in wine that Dr Crompton confirmed to Kathy…
That is why I beat Jason long ago and his repetitive trolling in response has badly failed to answer the credible arguments no matter how many times he does it…I’m not an idiot and Jason is too full of wicked troll fever to realize his demented trolling is something we beat years ago when Crosstown and Glebbeek first tried it…
Jason has been smoked by a pro and that’s why we’ve proven Jimi was murdered…
More phony bluster from a wine troll who’s been banned and laughed off of every site and forum he’s ever posted on. The only smoke Buster blows comes from out of his ass making up his asinine stories.
“Buster” has gotten his ass kicked from pillar to post each time I’ve refuted and debunked the garbage he pushes for his dead hoax.
Buster told us both Dr. Crompton and Dr. Thurston confirmed “wine” was inisde Jimi Hendrix. I’ve asked Buster to post statements from both doctors making this confirmation. Buster still hasn’t posted these confirmations from either doctor. This proves Buster is just a lying hoaxing troll who’s phony hoax has been easily debunked. No wine was ever detected or confirmed in any report.
Dr. Rufus Crompton directly told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him. Dr. Thurston confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose in his autopsy report. Dr. Teare confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose in his autopsy. Dr. Bob Brown confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose. John Saua and Reginal Jones confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose. Officer Ian Smith confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose when he stated that “he received a lot of call like that in those days”. Officer Ian Smith sure wasn’t getting many “wine drowning calls” from Ambulance men. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose on 9/18/70. Nowhere did any of these men say or document that Jimi died from a “wine drowning”. That ends this phony wine hoax.
Not one of these men ever stated or confirmed Jimi was “murdered”. That’s a bogus hoax made up by Buster who can’t even produce evidence of his phony “wine drowning” at the flat. Again, no documented evidence from this wine troll Buster who has easily lost.
Kathy Etchingham was directly told by Dr. Crompton that Jimi Hendrix died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him. No wine was ever detected anywhere inside Jimi Hendrix. Any fluid that was inside Jimi came from the results of the drug overdose which restricted his breathing causing his heart to work harder. This is the same thing that happens when a person has a bad heart and fluid develops. This is what happens when a person has a drug overdose. All the doctors had experience with drug overdoses and knew the effects of it. Dr. Teare stated Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning and never found and wine in his lungs or stomach.
If Jimi was “drowned in “wine” the wine would have suffocated him and he would be dead. This proves Jimi was not “drowned in wine” cuz of all the vomit. The fluid and the vomit is a result from the drug overdose which he suffocated on. Also, no wine was detected in Jimi’s lungs or the fluid during forensic analysis of Jimi’s body. Buster has no documented evidence of wine to prove his bogus claim cuz no wine existed.
Buster, when are you going to post confirmation of this imaginary wine you claim from Dr. Crompton and Dr. Thurston?
We all know you’re a troll and can’t ever post any statements from either doctor.
That’s why you can only post phony claims and use fake bluster and why we laugh at you.
Jason, like all C.T’s loose with the truth and the facts. You would think if a murder took place the murderers would get rid of the evidence with all that wine and Monika wouldn’t be standing across the road with Terry Slater waiting for the ambulance to arrive she would disappear. Monika gave a statement to the police officer about what happened and he sensed and saw nothing suspicious about the scene he was called to; it was a drug overdose and not a murder. Kathy’s investigation confirmed it was a drug overdose and not a murder. What Kathy did find out is that there was a delay in calling the ambulance, and Monika said herself she called around for help reiterated by Eric Burdon in his book as he urged her to call the ambulance something she stalled doing apparently.
It’s more than being loose, cuz Buster just makes up blatant lies.
Kathy Etchingham and Dr. Rufus Crompton never confirmed imaginary wine. Dr. Crompton directly told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him which he would never be able to survive. Crompton never said one word about imaginary wine cuz it did not exist. But Buster blatantly lies saying “Crompton confirmed wine” when he never did. Buster is a pathological liar who can never post a statement from Crompton confirming Buster’s fake wine.
I agree Ivana and that’s why their phony claims of wine is a joke.
Officer Ian Smith told Kathy that this was a routine drug overdose since he received a lot of calls like that. Not one person ever said Jimi was “murdered” who was at the flat or hospital. Even Fraud Bannister said it was only ‘plausible’ and he invented the imaginary wine.
Kathy started the investigation cuz of Monika’s claims that the ambulance men didn’t do their job and the hospital was responsible for Jimi’s death. Kathy found out Monika lied about being there and riding in the ambulance. Kathy also found out Jimi was dead for hours before Monika called for the ambulance. Most importantly, Kathy confirmed that Jimi died from a lethal drug overdose and got real testimony that was able to debunk and refute these bogus wine hoax stories.
Hi Jason, I read somewhere that President Nixon wanted Jimi to go to the White House because he wanted the youth of America to vote for him. There is even a photo of an English politician holding Jimi’s guitar so it’s pretty obvious they both realised that Jimi had enormous influence with the youth of the day, and wanted to be seen with him in order to win votes. The FBI or other Agencies would never target someone like Jimi. I saw an extensive list of singers/musicians who died because of their destructive habits mostly drug and alcohol related. Only fools side with hoaxers on this one as the forensics speak for themselves revealing no murder ever took place but clearly a case of willingly taking too many sleeping pills.
Of course they wouldn’t, but hoaxers need to push that fake angle of government involvement to make their hoax sound sinister. Excellent point you made.
Also, Nixon posed with Elvis in the now famous photo so he could appeal to more voters.
Hoaxers have no documented evidence of wine and have no answer to the fact St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose on 9/18/70 when hoaxers claim their imaginary wine.
Buster is hilarious. He says I have no respect for the readers or the truth.
Buster said that nobody reads this page, so he was lying about that as usual with another contradiction.
Of course I respect the readers, which I post the truth with real documented and forensic evidence, that proves Jimi died from a drug overdose. Everything I post comes from a legitimate source and is always documented. Unlike Buster, who makes up his own fantasy claims and uses his usual fraud sources who have been debunked. Buster takes what witnesses say and adds his own fake versions to it, which is fraudulent, cuz he never has any documented evidence to provide. This is why he is lying about Kathy and Dr. Crompton and “wine” when they never spoke of this bogus wine that doesn’t exist. Kathy never spoke about fake wine. Buster is a lying turd and can never defend or produce evidence for his phony claims. It’s always fake and bogus stories just like he lies about Dr. Crompton.
Dr. Crompton never confirmed any imaginary wine to Kathy Etchingham. Nowhere in Kathy’s book does she say she was told about “wine” from Dr. Crompton. But Buster the wine troll is a pathological liar and says Kathy Etchingham was told about wine. That is a bogus lie and Buster can never produce any documented statements of Crompton confirming imaginary wine.
BUSTER says: The reason he is easy to beat is because a jury would look at Jason promoting Kathy Etchingham saying Jimi overdosed but would then realize that Kathy also said Dr Crompton said Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…That jury would look at Jason dishonestly trying to hide the fact that is a major conflict that he can’t explain so he tries to deceive the readers by BS-ing around it…That jury would look at Jason’s sick trolling and insulting of the readers’ intelligence and rule that he is full of shit and a lying scumbag with no respect for the readers or the truth..
JASON says: Buster tries to promote his phony wine b.s. with his fake scenarios and has zero evidence as always. Same old useless words from this troll and zero documented evidence. That’s why he’s failed for 10 years and will forver cuz he has no real evidence to post. Only his bogus opinion as he distorts all the real evidence and testimony.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose on 9/18/70. Dr. Teare and Dr. Thurston both confirmed Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him resulting in an overdose. That was confirmed and documented by both of them. Dr. Crompton confirmed that to Kathy Etchingham 20 years later when he read the report to her. Kathy never stated anything about imaginary wine and said it was pills that killed Jimi.
Buster fraudulently tries to claim “fluid is wine”, but no wine was ever found in Jimi’s lungs, so this wine troll is defeated. The drug overdose caused the fluid build up and the profuse vomiting which is documented in the autopsy report. The jury would understand how the body works and the causes of a drug overdose. Buster the clown has zero evidence or documentation of wine and can never post any. That’s why he will always be defeated. Buster the clown claims a phony “victory” like the phony evidence he peddles. It’s a joke and it’s why he can never post anything of value.
BUSTER says : Kathy obviously would not lie about Crompton saying Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid because Crompton could have confirmed it back then…Jason cannot promote or cherry-pick quotes from Kathy that he likes and ignore others that disprove his false spin…It just doesn’t work that way and a jury would be right on Jason’s crazy lying ass…
JASON says: Buster the clown doesn’t tell you that Kathy confirmed Jimi died from a lethal drug overdose and Jimi couldn’t have survived it which was told to her by Dr. Rufus Crompton. The fluid had nothing to do with the fake imaginary wine. It had to do from the drug overdose which made it difficult for Hendrix to breathe due to the toxic amount of drugs in his system. Nothing about fake wine was ever documented or found in Jimi Hendrix and Buster the clown can’t produce one single piece of documented evidence to prove his phony claim.
BUSTER says: So what Jason has ignored and failed to answer in public is that Crompton’s drowning of the lungs in fluid takes forensic precedence over Jason’s false overdose that never happened and he doesn’t have proof for…Jimi never overdosed…He died by drowning in wine that Dr Crompton confirmed to Kathy…
JASON says: Haha…Sorry, fluid does not take precedence since the pills is what caused it. Buster is a fraudulent liar cuz Kathy Etchingham confirmed through Jimi’s autopsy report that he died from a lethal drug overdose. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose on 9/18/70 and every medical document on Hendrix confirms it. No wine was ever documented anywhere and wine troll Buster can’t produce a statement of Dr. Crompton confirming any fake wine.
Buster, post a statement of Dr Crompton confirming wine to Kathy. You can’t cuz he never confirmed any imaginary wine cuz there never was any wine.
Dr. Crompton confirmed to Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him.
BUSTER says: That is why I beat Jason long ago and his repetitive trolling in response has badly failed to answer the credible arguments no matter how many times he does it…I’m not an idiot and Jason is too full of wicked troll fever to realize his demented trolling is something we beat years ago when Crosstown and Glebbeek first tried it…
JASON says: Severe delusion from a wine clown.
Buster can never post any documented evidence of his fake imaginary wine so he will never be able to “win” anything since his phony wine never existed.
Buster is the worst of all pathological liars. He knows that Dr. Crompton never confirmed anything about this imaginary wine to Kathy, but he blatantly lies anyway cuz he is a wine troll promoting a hoax.
All Buster has to do is post a statement from Dr. Crompton confirming his imaginary wine, but Buster will never be able that cuz no wine ever existed.
Buster can only blow hot air instead of delivering the goods which he has been doing for 10 long years. Hilarious.
Saw a funny photo of a man and his cat wearing tin foil hats on a site called harmonycentral.com
Maybe it’s Buster haha
Buster says “he won” but has never produced one single piece of evidence to prove his phony “murder” claims. Buster is a gaslighting extraordinaire who is a wine troll promoting a debunked phony “Hendrix wine murder hoax” who continues to provide pure comedy.
BUSTER says: Jason has been smoked by a pro and that’s why we’ve proven Jimi was murdered.
JASON says: Buster is smoking something, that’s for sure, and it’s why he is so delusional.
How did Buster “prove Jimi was murdered”? By posting non existent evidence of his imaginary wine? By typing “Monika moaned into the phone” as told by fraud writer Sharon Lawrence? By repeating bogus claims from Fraud Bannister? By Buster making up his own fantasy stories and purposely lying about what the witnesses said?
Buster hasn’t proven a damn thing for 10 years and all the real evidence always refutes him. Not one witness or medical professional said Jimi was “murdered” and not one piece of forensic evidence even hints at it. All the testimony, documented evidence, and the forensics prove Jimi died from a lethal drug overdose. Buster can only make up bogus claims and pretend he’s “won” as he’s been doing for 10 years. Hilarious and pathetic!
Hi Jason, I’m still laughing about Buster smoking something. I love when he says “he won” but what exactly is it that he’s won-some fantastical war that only he fought and participated in. LOL.
I have real problem with this bit about Monika moaning into the phone to Sharon about washing sick off Jimi’s face with wine thinking it would help. Who in their right mind would admit to doing something like that and potentially contributing to Jimi’s death. Strange how this was brought up years later and never mentioned before in earlier biographies and remained hidden during Kathy’s investigation. Kathy would have left no stone unturned I’m sure. Sharon said she would rather stick her head in the oven than have anything to do with Monika but she found it convenient to contact Monika when she needed a story for her book though; just another reporter fishing for information. Sharon is the only biographer to believe Jimi killed himself, his death coinciding with his fascination with the number 9. Who believes this rubbish!
Yeah, and who moans into a phone for 20 seconds lol. Sharon also lied where Jimi was born, made up fake quotes about Jimi’s mother, and made up the bogus Thurston claim that tin foil hatters use for their phony wine hoax. You can’t believe a word this woman says. And she has no real evidence for her claims about Monika either so we have no idea how much of this is true or not. Sharon said Jimi committed suicide and then makes a big deal about Monika with wine. She can’t have it both ways when she already confirmed Jimi killed himself but wants to later claim wine when the wine is irrelevant when Jimi was already dead. A certain tin foil hat kook can’t answer that.
Doctor Bob Brown comes through again in the clutch, in this statement, debunking all the fake claims wine hoaxers make about phony “half hour treatments” that never happened. Bob Brown tells it like it is as this garbage “murder” hoax continues to burn in the dumpster fire it belongs in.
“I did locum jobs at five or six different little hospitals while I was there. One of them was St. Mary Abbots Hospital, and I was working there when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead. Straight away, I knew who he was, but there was nothing I could do for him. There were a lot of people weeping and much commotion. Poor Jimi.” – Doctor Bob Brown
JASON says: “There was nothing I could do for him” Dr. Bob Brown said. Since there was nothing that Bob Brown could do for Jimi, that means there was nothing Dr. Siefert could do for Jimi either. Siefert testified to the same exact account that he did nothing for Jimi Hendrix besides the basic resuscitation formality attempt. Which also means there was nothing Fraud Bannister could do either. And this statement from Dr. Bob Brown, easily debunks this phony wine removal claim that “The Grandfather of Wine” Fraud Bannister invented and the tin foil hatters use for their phony wine hoax. This again proves there were no phony “half hour treatments” and is a reason why no hospital documentation of it exists since it never happened folks. Dr. Bob Brown just told us again in this statement.
Also of great importance is the fact that Dr. Bob Brown confirms that Jimi was dead on arrival when he was brought in. This was reported by all the media on 9/18 and 9/19/70 and they received this information directly from St. Mary Abbots Hospital. So, the fact that Bob Brown confirms Jimi was a DOA proves as well no phony “treatments” occurred since people who have been dead for hours or legally declared dead on arrival do not have “treatments and procedures” performed on them.
Brown also makes known that there “were people weeping and much commotion” going on. So, when you have weeping people around when he was brought into the hospital, that means Jimi was already dead, and the hospital would not do “treatments” on him cuz there would be no point. Brown confirms that here and Siefert testified to that as well that there “was no point in doing anything else “since he was already dead”. This is how it is in real life folks, in make believe fantasy land, hoaxers sell you any fake story that makes their hoax sound good. Well, they are easily refuted and debunked by two doctors and they have no documentation to prove otherwise.
Don’t forget ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones said there “was nothing they could do to help Jimi”. And Officer Ian Smith also said “there was nothing anybody could do to help Jimi”. So, that’s 5 men who testified to the same account that Jimi Hendrix was dead and could not be saved. Then you have two doctors stating that nothing was done for Hendrix cuz he was already dead. All of this evidence plus no hospital reports of these phony “treatments” hoaxers peddle ultimately proves no fake “wine removal” happened. These professionals were there, the wine hoaxers and the fraud authors were not.
Dr. Bob Brown never said anything about Jimi being “murdered” or witnessed him being “covered in wine” or being “drowned” in the fake and phony imaginary wine that never existed. Brown witnessed Jimi dead first and never saw this imaginary wine that Fraud Bannister made up 21 years later. Buster the clown has not proven anything for his hoax except he shows himself to be an incompetent buffoon writing total nonsense.
Well folks, this is just more information and confirmation that puts more nails in the wine hoax coffin. No phony “procedures” were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix and hoaxers have no documented evidence to prove it since none exists . Two doctors testified and refute their fake claims. These doctors were there, the wine hoaxers and the fraud authors were not. Dr. Bob Brown’s statement continues to kill this phony debunked wine hoax which has always been dead on arrival cuz it is a joke.
Hi Jason. Hoaxers are just trying to rewrite the story about Jimi’s death pushing their own take on the events that morning hoping people will buy into it. No thinking person would believe that procedures were done on a long dead corpse or go against the autopsy findings conducted by the well respected and experienced Dr. Teare. Nothing about the scene that morning screamed murder by waterboarding with red wine what was confirmed however was a barbiturate overdose. Kathy’s investigation in the 90’s did not reveal anything sinister happening to Jimi but confirmed that Jimi did die as a result of taking too many sleeping pills and reiterated by Dr. Crompton who read over Dr. Teare’s report.
The hoaxers do a terrible job at writing their fiction. They contradict their old phony claims with new ones that ends up refuting both. These frauds can never produce any real evidence for their hoax. All they do is smear and distort the real evidence with their fantasy stories.
Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him. Buster the wine troll lied claiming his imaginary wine that doesn’t exist instead. Buster can’t produce a statement from Dr. Crompton “confirming” Buster’s imaginary wine. Pretty pathetic that Buster can only add his fake version to what the real record says.
BUSTER says: So what Jason has ignored and failed to answer in public is that Crompton’s drowning of the lungs in fluid takes forensic precedence over Jason’s false overdose that never happened and he doesn’t have proof for…Jimi never overdosed…He died by drowning in wine that Dr Crompton confirmed to Kathy…
JASON says: Buster is a wine troll who has no evidence of his phony made up “wine drowning”. Where did Dr. Crompton ever “confirm” anything about wine or that “Jimi was drowned in wine”? Dr. Crompton never confirmed any imaginary wine to Kathy cuz nothing about wine was ever documented on Jimi’s autopsy report from 1970. The phony wine claims started in 1992 by Fraud Bannister.
All Dr. Crompton did was read Jimi’s autopsy report that Kathy gave him to read. That report was documented by Dr. Teare in 1970 and nothing about wine was ever stated cuz no wine ever existed. Dr. Crompton could never “confirm wine” cuz nothing about wine was ever detected in 1970. Kathy met with Crompton before all these hoaxers started their bogus wine claims. Buster is a pathological liar rewriting history and adding his own fake version to events cuz he has nothin’.
Jimi died from a lethal barbiturate overdose and all the documented evidence and testimony I’ve posted proves it. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi’s drug overdose. Dr. Bob Brown, the ambulance men and the police witnessed it and confirmed it. Dr. Crompton confirmed it to Kathy. The forensic analysis of Jimi’s body by Dr. Teare and the final report by Dr. Thurston proved the overdose and it’s etched in stone forever in history.
This goon is deliberately refusing to believe what happened to Jimi. He is purposely ignoring all the facts that happened that morning and the testimony of the actual witnesses and placing his trust in dodgy characters, bogus reports and books therefore nothing our goon says can be believed or trusted. He has wasted 10 years of his life on a fantasy.
He has to be mentally deranged in order to deny the obvious facts and to purposely lie by changing the words of what the doctors and witnesses say. He just did it with Crompton fraudulently lying saying Crompton “confirmed wine” when he never did. 10 years and he proved nothin’.
Check out a site called Prayer woman JFK Assassination Forum; you guessed it it’s Buster/ Brian Doyle. John Iacoletti makes some insightful comments directed at Buster.
I’ll have to check that site out. Buster posts there too?
Here is what a moderator at another forum had to say about “Buster”.
“As stiff as the competition is, it’s simply not possible to put anybody ahead of Buster as the most universally reviled poster on any forum.”
Hi Ivana,
I just saw that site you mentioned. So it appears “Buster” aka Brian Doyle, gets banned on political forums as well as Jimi Hendrix/music forums. He’s just a troublemaker and a troll. It’s obvious to see from his behavior and posts on various sites.
“Brian Doyle is a self-absorbed, narcissistic, broken record who lies about the evidence and whines constantly about being banned from just about every JFK forum for his behavior. Don’t believe anything he tells you because he is a pathological liar.”
“Doyle is a lying coward.”
Hi Ivana,
Check out this site strat-talk
Scrum Drum
Banned
Messages: 28
“Buster” posted there until he got banned after 28 posts. He was posting the same hoax nonsense and abusive posts to other members for not agreeing with him. Members called him a troll, which he is, rejected his garbage, and laughed at him. Here’s what a few members said about him.
“From carver”
oh how sad, the asshat is gone.
“From skinnyman1825”
Scum Dumb, just a thought, but if you wanna have legitimate discussions with people about an event, don’t be so abrasive in your rebuttal and post some actual factual evidence rather than yours or someone else’s interpretation of hearsay about events that may or may not have occurred.
“From guitarvegas”
Sir I have asked you a direct question twice now and instead of answering me you dodge me. Therefore I think all you are saying is complete and total rubbish. Prove yourself or else I am flagging you as a troll.
“From mouse”
I’m sorry but what you presented here would never be considered evidence in a court of law. All I’ve read is hearsay. You seem to be the upset one as no one appears to be taking you seriously. If you posted something of substance (like that autopsy report you claim to have) then you’d have a basis for discussion. Otherwise, you’re just words on a screen. I assume you have some stake in getting others to believe your story. So far, you’re failing miserably.
Good luck with whatever book you’re writing. I hope it has more evidence than you’ve presented here.
“From mouse”
We’re going to keep going in this circle aren’t we? You’re not going to produce the autopsy data sheets are you? Sorry but until you do, it’s hearsay.
I guess you can laugh at me safely from behind your computer screen but as I said, this doesn’t matter to me even a little bit. I’ll go on with my life and write you off as one of the multitude of internet weirdos I’ve encountered. You however have something to prove and thus far, you’ve failed. Everyone who comes into this thread will see that you failed. You can shout from the rafters about your forensic evidence but it won’t make your argument any less of a failure. You might consider hiring a publicist as you’re not very good at this sort of thing.
Like I said, good luck with whatever publication you’re putting out there. Thanks for the entertainment during my lunch.
“From Giant”
This is entertaining. A “serious researcher” usually has no problem posting actually evidence and answering questions about their “findings”. You sir, are a tool.
“From orphoet”
Still waiting for you to address the issue I brought up regarding the impossible amount of barbiturate according to this phantom report. I assume you’re ignoring it because it proves you don’t understand the info you are presenting.
“From drubbing”
This dudes Jimi was murdered thread was canned at TDPRI.
This is all he does, jump on forums and start picking fights with people based on some trashy book. Reading some of his crap here again, he seems to cut n paste an awful lot of stuff from previous forums – almost as if he knows what will stir things up the most?
If you feed the troll, expect to have any scepticism met with a point by point argument over why you can’t disprove him because of all the ‘forensic’ evidence. Cos he’s read the book, and of course every bit of it is true.
“From drubbing”
Great. Take it to Scotland Yard then and let them get on with it.
Yaay, internet warrior solves Jimi case 40 years later, and all it took was forensic evidence that has been available all the time.
Oh, but SC are still in on the Conspiracy aren’t they? Damn. Try the producers of Cold Case. How about Horatio Caine? He’s got a Hummer and doesn’t stop til he busts his perp.
Yeah thanks for the reply. Keep going mate, the only evidence you’re providing that people will believe is that you’re a troll.
“From krist”
Basically this guy has been conversing with himself for what seems like a good couple of years at least!
Just type his name in on google.
“From dggriffin”
So what, if any, legal education do you have that shows that you should be a credible source for providing forensic evidence?
Oh wait I didn’t disprove anything you said, how foolish of me to question an iMoron.
“From drubbing”
He’ll turn up on another forum somewhere. He’s either selling something (very badly), or is a world-class frootloop. Given the only place he has a fan base is on David Icke’s site, populated by those trying to out-frootloop each other, probably a hefty dose of both.
From “the shedder”
Oh Dear!…can’t leave you guys ( and gals) alone…turn my back for two minutes…and your feeding trolls…again!!!.
And the worst part is…..
…. I MISSED IT…..AGAIN!
“From thecableguy”
Wow, I can’t believe the tangent this took! And they finally banned the scum guy, thanks mods!
“From drubbing”
Wasn’t so much a tangent, as a hijack. I think he just trolls the net for Jimi threads.
Jason this is absolutely priceless. All of these posters have understood Buster really well as a frootloop. You would think if you’re despised that much you would give up but Buster doesn’t get it. Love the out-frootloop each other bit. Purple Jim over at Crosstown Torrents, I think has a moving laughing emoji just for Buster.
Jimi was recording his first album Are You Experienced during these next few days back in 1966. Just picked up an Italian first pressing on the Polydor label.
Congratulations Jason, Will be worth quite a bit. Great album love the title track said to be the best example of psychedelic music ever. Nothing beats the sound of his music on vinyl. Don’t forget to turn up the volume. LOL.
Thanks Ivana,
I collect different pressings from different countries not just from Jimi, but many other bands and artists. This LP from Italy is in like perfect condition and was played only once. The jacket is super clean too which is always a plus. It’s getting harder to find clean pressings since people played the hell out of them back in the day and all the collectors copies aren’t really being sold or if they are they get bought up really fast.
Hi Jason, Sounds like you have a terrific collection there, and a great interest to have. I have the United States cover of the Electric LadyLand album as the English one was too risqué and sold with a paper covering back then. I read that the Cry Of Love album was hard to find and is no longer available. In the seventies I bought the three set Woodstock album which I played over and over until the cover fell apart. Vinyl seems to be making a comeback.
Ivana,
I have over 2,000 LP’s consisting of various issues and pressings of many different artists.
Jimi didn’t like the fact that the naked women were used on the album jacket, but that copy does have a better sound than the US Reprise.
Actually, an original The Cry of Love can be found reasonably priced on music marketplace sites with many in great condition. You can still get this album brand new. The album was remastered from the original analog mater tapes on 180 gram vinyl and was reissued. Some people say it sounds better than the original. I didn’t buy the reissue but might just to hear how it sounds
Michael Jeffery was the Executive Producer and had the final say on which songs would make the album and the running order of the tracks. He also decided which photos of Jimi he wanted to add inside the gatefold jacket. Monika wanted to add her photos she took of Jimi, but Jeffery rejected and chose earlier photos of Jimj. That angered Monika cuz she claimed Jimi wanted her to design the artwork and photo for the albums.
The Woodstock album would be a good set. Recently, they mad a deluxe cd box set of all 3 days at Woodstock.
Vinyl is back, but it’s both good thing and a bad thing. The good thing is lots of really good reissues are being pressed, with many being pressed on colored vinyl. Some of these records sound better than the originals. The bad thing is there are a lot of sellers who don’t know how to grade or are fraud sellers who purposely lie over-grading their junk and people are getting crap they didn’t intend to pay for.
Jason still hasn’t answered the question…If Jason is quoting Kathy saying Jimi overdosed then he has to quote her saying Dr Crompton said Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…Since medical pathology requires drowning in fluid to take precedent over overdose Jason is openly violating the rules of both debate and evidence in public…Drowning in fluid trumps overdose 1) Because Jimi didn’t have enough barbiturate in him to overdose…2) Jimi’s blood alcohol content showed the lungs full of fluid killed him…
Jason gets away with his denial trolling because he is being allowed to judge his own content…Once Jason and his input were subjected to credible scrutiny he would be dismissed for defaulting for not answering any of the evidence I spelled out here both by science and by debate rules…
What is happening here is a ballsy troll who was stupid enough to take me on and deny Jimi’s murder has just had his ass handed to him by the best in the business…
This clown “Buster” is back with his distortions and fake fantasy scenarios with zero evidence to produce. All he can do is distort the real evidence with his bullshit. That’s why he is a clown and spent 10 years trolling websites posting this same garbage. Nobody takes this joker seriously.
BUSTER says: Jason still hasn’t answered the question…If Jason is quoting Kathy saying Jimi overdosed then he has to quote her saying Dr Crompton said Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…Since medical pathology requires drowning in fluid to take precedent over overdose Jason is openly violating the rules of both debate and evidence in public…Drowning in fluid trumps overdose 1) Because Jimi didn’t have enough barbiturate in him to overdose…2) Jimi’s blood alcohol content showed the lungs full of fluid killed him…
JASON says: Jimi had a lethal dose of barbiturates that killed him. Dr. Crompton confirmed this to Kathy and your fake fantasy scenario is hilarious cuz you have no evidence and can only “type” your bullshit.
BUSTER says: Jason gets away with his denial trolling because he is being allowed to judge his own content…Once Jason and his input were subjected to credible scrutiny he would be dismissed for defaulting for not answering any of the evidence I spelled out here both by science and by debate rules…
JASON says: Science and forensics refutes you and you’ve been banned from every forum you posted in cuz you’e a troll.
BUSTER says: What is happening here is a ballsy troll who was stupid enough to take me on and deny Jimi’s murder has just had his ass handed to him by the best in the business…
JASON says: LMAO. This clown has zero evidence for his phony claims and get his ass kicked in each ridiculous post he makes.
Here’s another short article that debunks the phony “Hendrix Wine Murder Hoax”. Dr. Teare confirmed at the inquest that Jimi died from swallowing vomit due to barbiturate poisoning. Dr. Crompton confirmed that to Kathy 20 years later when he told her that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that he wouldn’t be able to survive.
Most importantly, not one word about the imaginary wine was ever mentioned and nothing about “fluid” as being a cause of death. The vomit due to the drug overdose is what killed Jimi, which suffocated him not allowing him to breathe.
The barbiturate overdose poisoned Jimi’s system which proved be lethal, as confirmed by Dr. Crompton, slowing down Jimi’s nervous system forcing his heart to work harder, causing fluid to build up as Dr. Teare found that the right side of Hendrix’s heart was widely dilated due to the overdose. This would not happen for a “wine downing” and forensics proves the phony “wine drowning” is a hoax. The overdose of Vesparax plus other drugs in his system caused the overdose that destroyed his liver with a toxic 0.7 mg/100 ml reading.
No imaginary wine was ever found in Jimi’s lungs or stomach and the overdose of Vesparax clearly indicates this is what caused Jimi’s death. Dr. Teare confirmed the barbiturate poisoning at the inquest and Dr. Crompton confirmed it to Kathy 20 years later.
Reuters
Verdict Announced At Hendrix Inquest
September 29, 1970
Internationally acclaimed rock star, Jimi Hendrix 27, died of suffocation after swallowing 9 Vesparax barbiturate tablets resulting in an overdose.
Pathologist Donald Teare, who conducted a post mortem examination, told a Westminster (London) Coroner’s Court that Mr. Hendrix died as a result of having swallowed vomit caused by barbiturate poisoning.
The verdict, thus, dispels the mystery surrounding the artist’s sudden death in England on September 18.
Westminster Coroner Dr. Gavin Thurston recorded an open verdict at the inquest. He said there was no evidence Hendrix intended suicide. “The question why he took so many sleeping tablets cannot be safely answered,” he said.
The official cause of death was from the inhalation of vomit following barbiturate intoxication.
Without the phony wine this hoaxer has no reason for being on this site or any other that’s why he keeps pushing his fake scenarios as an excuse to keep peddling his dumb misinformation.
He’s trying to peddle “fluid” claiming it’s “wine” and no autopsy report or doctor attributes “fluid” as a cause of death.
The cause of death resulted from the inhalation of vomit due to the drug overdose. Dr. Crompton said Jimi would have died anyway from the lethal amounts of barbiturates in him.
Hi Jason,They say you can remember where you were or what you were doing when certain people pass away well I was watching a morning music program when Jimi’s death was announced. A music journalist by the name of Ian “molly” Meldrum delivered this news. However you look at it, Buster’s story is not reputable; just what are his credentials apart from being a tin foil hatter. He is trying to be judge, jury, forensic scientist, pathologist and medical professional and I guarantee he is none of these things. He is a peddler of a hoax uncovered by a number of music and other forums and booted out by most of them. No-one should take him or his story seriously.
Hi Ivana,
Buster’s story is a joke which is made up by him. Reading the sites he posted on nobody takes him seriously. He makes up his own phony forensic claim and makes up his own fake version of events that never happened. Now he’s trying to claim that Jimi “didn’t have enough pills to overdose”. It’s a bogus scam so he can claim his imaginary wine. Every witness and doctor said Jimi overdosed and the hospital confirmed it on 9/18/70. Fraud Bannister confirmed it on 9/18/70 and then lied 20 years later The autopsy report confirmed it and so did Crompton. He needs to claim in his crazy head he won a “debate”.
And here’s another small article of Jimi’s death. An overdose was already stated as a cause of death even before the autopsy. No report of the phony imaginary wine and no mention of the fake “treatments” either cuz neither ever happened. Jimi was pronounced dead and then was shipped off to the morgue like it happened back in 1970. None of these fake “treatments” are documented cuz it never happened. Kathy read all the reports and it said nothing about imaginary wine or phony treatments. Crompton told Kathy that Jimi died from a lethal overdose.
Jimi Hendrix Dies of Overdose
September 18, 1970
London, Sept. 18 – Jimi Hendrix, whom millions of fans considered the world’s finest pop star, died today of what police sources said was an apparent overdose of drugs.
He was pronounced dead after being taken in an ambulance to St. Mary Abbots Hospital.
His body was taken from the hospital to a southwest London morgue for an autopsy. An inquest will be held.
Hendrix, whose wild performance often ended with his smashing his guitar and amplification equipment, seemed to write his own epitaph when a year ago he told a reporter:
“I tell you when I die I’m going to have a funeral. I’m going to have a jam session. And, knowing me, I’ll probably get busted at my own funeral.”
Hi Jason, Who would be dumb enough to take the word of a hoaxer over that of a distinguished pathologist in Dr.Teare. If Dr.Teare concluded what he did after performing the autopsy then he must have witnessed what he recorded. If he didn’t write anything about wine then there wasn’t any, or at least not enough to cause Jimi’s death. What Dr. Teare did see and record was inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. Dr. Crompton reiterated Dr. Teare’s findings because there was no reason to question them when approached by Kathy. Talking about Jimi’s funeral Noel Redding noticed that a lot of people attended because it was the place to be seen even though they had no connection to Jimi at all. I think Eric Burdon said Jimi wanted to be buried in England and not in Seattle. I saw pictures of Jimi’s monumental gravesite which I think Janie Hendrix commissioned at this new location in the cemetery.
Dr. Teare and Dr. Crompton were the top pathologist and coroner in London and probably the world at the time. And this hoaxer takes their findings trying to add his imaginary win to it claiming “this is what they really meant” . Buster is a total clown an gets laughed off of every forum. No wine was ever found and this wine hoaxer can only claim fake wine.
What the obvious delinquent troll Jason is ignoring is that the quote from Dr Teare does not necessarily preclude the “vomit” being wine…If you apply wine being forced down Jimi’s throat while he was deliberately incapacitated on the strongest sleeping pills on the market then it doesn’t necessarily conflict with those same words…After all “suffocated” and drowning in wine are technically the same thing…
The wording “poisoning” in this article connotes a fatal overdose, but as Flyswatter pointed out, the actual Inquest cause of death says “intoxication”, meaning a less than lethal level was found…Jason is trollishly and obnoxiously exploiting semantics here by deliberately playing dumb and entering what he knows to be false wording…The word “poisoning” was placed in there by the writer of that news article and cannot be found on any of the autopsy documents…This evidences Jason’s deceptiveness, dishonesty, and intent to deceive…
As is typical of Jason, he is just pulling his claim that the heart would not swell from wine drowning out of his ass…He has no basis for that…The truth is medical science says the heart would show that pathology from drowning in wine…Jimi’s swelling of the heart was worse than Bon Scott and John Bonham because Jimi had more of a proper drowning and less of an intoxication level than those other two…Jimi had a bigger insult and more of a body reaction than those other two and it shows up in the death scene forensics…
Jason is ignoring that once Dr Crompton said Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid, and Dr Thurston said Jimi’s stomach was full of wine, that they were medically/legally required to follow-through on it forensically…The fact they didn’t evidences a cover-up at the official level…Once you understand that then Dr Thurston’s words that the reason Jimi took so many pills can’t be “safely” answered takes on its true meaning…It is pretty clear what Dr Thurston is trying to tell us…
Here’s another fiction story from the wine troll “Buster” aka Brian Doyle who presents us with his own fake interpretation of what he wants to believe. Same old debunked bullshit claims with no evidence. Sorry this is not how it is. Still no evidence from this clown that he can ever post cuz he is a fraud. All this fraud can do is distort the real record and evidence with his bogus wine trolling.
BUSTER says: What the obvious delinquent troll Jason is ignoring is that the quote from Dr Teare does not necessarily preclude the “vomit” being wine…If you apply wine being forced down Jimi’s throat while he was deliberately incapacitated on the strongest sleeping pills on the market then it doesn’t necessarily conflict with those same words…After all “suffocated” and drowning in wine are technically the same thing…
JASON says: You’re the delinquent troll who’s been banned from every Jimi Hendrix and politics forum you’ve ever posted on.
We don’t apply any imaginary wine cuz there was never any wine. This is a fake scenario that ever happened. Teare never documented any wine so this nonsense is void.
BUSTER says: The wording “poisoning” in this article connotes a fatal overdose, but as Flyswatter pointed out, the actual Inquest cause of death says “intoxication”, meaning a less than lethal level was found…Jason is trollishly and obnoxiously exploiting semantics here by deliberately playing dumb and entering what he knows to be false wording…The word “poisoning” was placed in there by the writer of that news article and cannot be found on any of the autopsy documents…This evidences Jason’s deceptiveness, dishonesty, and intent to deceive…
JASON says: You are “Flyswatter” as you use numerous fake names to post on various sites.
More of your fake interpretation and zero evidence.
This is a blatant lie as you’re saying a “less lethal level was found”. Jimi took a lethal dose that killed him which he was not able to survive. Dr. Crompton told this to Kathy. This was the barbiturate poisoning confirmed by Dr. Teare.
Dr. Teare confirmed Jimi Hendrix had barbiturate poisoning which Dr. Crompton confirmed was lethal to his system when he was intoxicated by the pills. “Buster” is using projection here as he is deceiving you. There was no wine and this troll is trying to implement his fake imaginary wine over the pills that killed Jimi. No wine was ever found or documented. Jimi died of a drug overdose and this troll has no documents of his phony wine,
BUSTER says: As is typical of Jason, he is just pulling his claim that the heart would not swell from wine drowning out of his ass…He has no basis for that…The truth is medical science says the heart would show that pathology from drowning in wine…Jimi’s swelling of the heart was worse than Bon Scott and John Bonham because Jimi had more of a proper drowning and less of an intoxication level than those other two…Jimi had a bigger insult and more of a body reaction than those other two and it shows up in the death scene forensics…
JASON says: The forensic showed a drug overdose and Dr. Teare found no imaginary drowning. Nothing about Jimi’s death shows anything of a “drowning”.
Jimi’s death clearly showed a drug overdose that was confirmed by the ambulance attendants, police, hospital, doctors, media, pathologist, coroner.
Buster is a troll has no evidence and knows nothing about forensics. Dr. Teare was a famous pathologist who determined Jimi died from a drug overdose.
BUSTER says: Jason is ignoring that once Dr Crompton said Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid, and Dr Thurston said Jimi’s stomach was full of wine, that they were medically/legally required to follow-through on it forensically…The fact they didn’t evidences a cover-up at the official level…Once you understand that then Dr Thurston’s words that the reason Jimi took so many pills can’t be “safely” answered takes on its true meaning…It is pretty clear what Dr Thurston is trying to tell us…
JASON says: Same old bullshit claims and phony fiction stories with no evidence.
Dr. Thurston never said “Jimi’s stomach was full wine”. That is another blatant lie. Thurston said Jimi died from an overdose.
More of your fake “cover up” crap.
You’re a troll who has zero evidence and can only change the events and add your fake speculation. Pathetic.
Hi Jason, The master of deception and subterfuge is at it again with his false forensic take on things supplanting the real evidence of the experts with his own.
Hi Ivana,
All “Buster” can do is bullshit his way through his hoax with his nonsense. A total clown.
The number of times I’ve seen Jimi’s death certificate reproduced in biographies without question says it all. No-one disputed its findings or saw any reason to. There was never a suspicion of murder surrounding Jimi’s death or anything suspect about his death. He clearly overdosed on barbiturates with no chance of survival. The only odd thing is that the ambulance was called hours later after Jimi died but this was partly explained by Monika who rang around for help and then by Eric Burdon who helped clean the flat before the ambulance was sent for. At any rate Jimi was dead and beyond help lying on top of the bed fully clothed.
Jason is entering provably false information above…The .7mg barbiturate level found in Jimi at the autopsy was below fatal…It was declared as less than fatal by the doctors Monika hired to look at Jimi’s death and her pills…Jason is just childishly ignoring that the manufacturer’s product information on the Vesparax barbiturate showed that Jimi was below lethal dose at 9 tablets because of his famous tolerance as well as not having enough time to overdose only 1 or 2 hours after ingesting those 9 tablets…Jason responds to these hard facts with propaganda and name-calling but he never directly answers or accounts for them…Also 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate and a person with a high tolerance cannot nearly overdose on only 1800mg of barbiturate,,,This is a hard fact that Jason ignores…He would not be allowed to do that in a court of law or credibly moderated debate where, if he trolled hard facts and evidence, he would be quickly booted…His failure to answer these facts is a concession of the debate…
Jason is offering one of his demented outright lies above…Nowhere will Jason be able to quote Dr Teare saying Jimi died of barbiturate “poisoning”…The London Coroner’s Office was very careful in its wording and nomenclature…If the level was less than lethal it entered the “Intoxication” that was written on Jimi’s autopsy sheet…Dr Thurston handled Judy Garland’s overdose death the year before and entered “poisoning” for her lethal dose…This clearly indicates the difference between the two and proves that Jimi did not ingest a lethal dose…Jason is a sick puppy and is defiantly entering it anyway because he’s here to troll the subject and is not making any serious entries…This is why I won this debate long ago…
Dr Crompton clearly said Jimi had lungs full of fluid…Jason trolled it and refused to credibly answer for it…Jason loses…That fluid was clearly Bannister’s wine…Debate over…
Buster aka Brian Doyle can only distort the real record with his bogus claims as he has no real evidence of his own. He uses Monika Dannemann as his source again claiming Vesprax manufacturers outweigh the autopsy results of what Dr. Teare found in Jimi’s autopsy. What a joke. Buster knows Dr. Teare’s findings refutes his bogus claims so he has to make fake claims of Jimi having a “famous tolerance” to drugs in order to push his bogus hoax. Jimi never had a “famous tolerance” to Vesparax cuz that was more powerful than anything he ever took before. One pill was the dose that was needed to take. Jimi took 8 more of those pills plus a powerful amphetamine. All those pills poisoned his system and Buster the clown pretends that it didn’t with his bogus and ridiculous claims. Jimi’s death was investigated by the best men in the world. Buster can only deny their findings with his own bogus opinion and phony claims he read in books by fraud sources. Buster is no “expert” he is a fraud who can’t produce any documentation for the imaginary wine he claims. So, he plays games instead. Buster distorts the truth, adds his phony claims, makes up a fake court scenario that the person he argues with didn’t answer “his evidence”, after that he declares a phony “victory” and says “he won the debate” still while never producing one piece of real documented evidence. Just a bunch of useless words and troll games. This is how Buster operates and he’s been at it 10 years and still has never proved anything. This trolling clown has been debunked, refuted, and exposed as a fraud. That’s why he cuts and runs having zero evidence to produce. Very weak and pathetic.
BUSTER says: Jason is entering provably false information above…The .7mg barbiturate level found in Jimi at the autopsy was below fatal…
JASON says: The information is factual documented evidence. “Buster” is entering the same garbage for his hoax. The barbiturate dose Jimi took was fatal. That was confirmed by Dr. Teare in the autopsy and confirmed to Kathy 20 years later by Dr. Rufus Crompton. Two of the top pathologists in the world both confirmed this fact. Buster the clown is using his propaganda telling you “it wasn’t”. Buster makes up his own bogus evidence cuz he is a fraud.
BUSTER says: It was declared as less than fatal by the doctors Monika hired to look at Jimi’s death and her pills…Jason is just childishly ignoring that the manufacturer’s product information on the Vesparax barbiturate showed that Jimi was below lethal dose at 9 tablets because of his famous tolerance as well as not having enough time to overdose only 1 or 2 hours after ingesting those 9 tablets…
JASON says: This is a blatant lie. Same old bogus spin from this lying fraud. It was not declared “less than fatal” by the doctors. Dr. Teare confirmed Jimi had barbiturate poisoning at the inquest. That is fatal.
Dr. Rufus Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates. That is fatal. Jimi didn’t have a “famous tolerance” to Vesparax and your fake argument is a joke and has been debunked. Both doctors refute your garbage you peddle.
BUSTER says: Jason responds to these hard facts with propaganda and name-calling but he never directly answers or accounts for them…Also 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate and a person with a high tolerance cannot nearly overdose on only 1800mg of barbiturate,,,This is a hard fact that Jason ignores…He would not be allowed to do that in a court of law or credibly moderated debate where, if he trolled hard facts and evidence, he would be quickly booted…His failure to answer these facts is a concession of the debate…
JASON says: These are not “hard facts”, it’s a bunch of nonsense and crap you make up. And yes, I’ve refuted all the crap you make up or repeat from your fiction book. Jimi did not have a “tolerance” to Vesparax since he never took them before. These pills were more powerful than anything he ever took before and he took 9 of them plus a “black bomber” which is a powerful amphetamine, and alcohol he was drinking at the parties all evening. The alcohol sped up the process mixing with the drugs that killed him. This all was confirmed and is documented history. All you can do is lie and whine with your alternative nonsense that you have no evidence to prove of anything.
Your troll game is old and we all know how it works. You distort the real evidence with your made up garbage. Then you claim the other person ignores what you claim. Then you make up your fake hypothetical court fantasy claim. Then you declare the other person has lost. All while you posted nothing of substance or facts. Just hot air and useless words as you pretend to sound knowledgeable of the subject. Buster does this cuz he has no evidence to produce so he plays games instead. Pathetic.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose. What about that do you not understand? Dr. Teare, Dr. Thurston, and Dr. Crompton all comfirmed it. You have no hard documented to prove otherwise.
BUSTER says: Jason is offering one of his demented outright lies above…Nowhere will Jason be able to quote Dr Teare saying Jimi died of barbiturate “poisoning”…The London Coroner’s Office was very careful in its wording and nomenclature…If the level was less than lethal it entered the “Intoxication” that was written on Jimi’s autopsy sheet…Dr Thurston handled Judy Garland’s overdose death the year before and entered “poisoning” for her lethal dose…This clearly indicates the difference between the two and proves that Jimi did not ingest a lethal dose…Jason is a sick puppy and is defiantly entering it anyway because he’s here to troll the subject and is not making any serious entries…This is why I won this debate long ago…
JASON says: You’ve lost badly and all you can do is whine with your bogus alternative claims that you have no evidence to produce.
The only demented liar is you. You’ve been banned from every site and forum for posting these lies.
Dr. Teare told the inquest that Jimi Hendrix died from barbiturate poisoning. It was reported all over the media on September 29, 1970 when it was reported. 20 years later Dr. Crompton confirmed to Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates. That is barbiturate poisoning. Buster has no documented evidence to produce. Only his trolling words. That’s why he has failed for 10 years with his hoax.
BUSTER says: Dr Crompton clearly said Jimi had lungs full of fluid…Jason trolled it and refused to credibly answer for it…Jason loses…That fluid was clearly Bannister’s wine…Debate over…
JASON says: Buster is a weak coward who dictates his own bogus debate rules so he can claim “he won” based on zero evidence. Hilarious!
Buster aka Brian Doyle claims his fake imaginary wine again but still has no evidence and he never will cuz no wine was never detected inisde Jimi Hendrix” lungs or body.
The drug overdose caused fluid to build up inside Jimi Hendrix and nothing in the analyzed fluid, Jimi’s lungs, or stomach detected any wine.
There was no wine and this troll will never be able to produce a document that shows anything about wine. All he do can do is play word games and make bogus claims.
Buster’s fake hoax is debunked for good and he ends 2019 as an expose fraud with a debunked hoax.
Buster is regurgitating the same nonsense again. If Jimi had a high tolerance for the barbiturate he would probably be around today. Dr Teare did not get the autopsy findings wrong it is Buster who is creating an alternative story; not to be confused with what really happened. Judy Garland was a habitual user of barbiturates from a young age and also drank heavily. The poisoning refers to her continual use and she was also plagued by a number of health issues. Jimi took a lethal amount which rendered him unconscious in a short amount of time causing him to choke on his own vomit and eventually killing him.
Ivana,
Any lethal overdose is poisoning and Dr. Teare confirmed that at the inquest which was reported worldwide on September 29, 1970.
Dr. Crompton told Kathy the same thing 20 years later that the Vesparax killed Jimi’s liver and he would not have survived.
Then “Buster” uses his bogus claim with Monika Dannemann and Vesparax manufacturers claiming Jimi had a “famous tolerance” to drugs so he “couldn’t have died” and then he claims his imaginary wine for fluid. What a joke.
Buster never posts any evidence, he trolls with his fantasy scenarios and fake court hypothetical scenarios where he says “you didn’t answer his claims”, then he says “you lost the debate” and declares a phony victory.
In the real world, an overdose of barbiturates is still listed as the offical cause of death for Jimi Hendrix and Buster the clown has no real evidence to refute it.
Hi Jason, Buster is trying to sound as if he is a reputable authority pitting himself against the forensic team of the day. Nothing he says makes sense, and there is no sound medical knowledge to back his claims. The normal dosage for Vesparax is half a tablet and Jimi took nine of these; imagine believing that this high dosage wouldn’t cause any internal damage or cause someone’s death. Dr Crompton reiterated Dr.Teare’s findings. I’m sure the manufacturers of Vesparax would have inserted a leaflet explaining the dosage and possible side effects of the drug, and I’m sure Monika would have known about these. Doctors always warn against taking medications prescribed to someone else.
“Buster” can only make up garbage to distort the real evidence. Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates. Every real document and legitimate doctor proved it in 1970. Buster only has decades later after the fact phony claims and his hot air trolling. That’s why he can never produce any real evidence and he never will.
Jason once again fails to answer the evidence where it counts…No matter how many times Jason tries to desperately escape in to falsely-spun semantics he still hasn’t answered the hard facts…Part of the problem here is when Jason decided to troll this subject he went to Google and found all the arguments of the worst deniers who have since quit trying to deny Jimi’s murder via those arguments because I have beaten them so badly out in the real world…Truth is my evidence was so good that it has literally silenced the deniers everywhere else…The only remaining denier was Jim Hawthorn but he was forced to use cowardly censorship and banning to escape answering my facts…
Because Jason is skimming Google for his out-dated denial he hasn’t seen Glebbeek’s reference to the product manufacturer’s information saying Lethal Dose was “9 to 10 tablets”…The reason they listed that amount for Lethal Dose was because they knew 9 Vesparax only contained 1800mg of Barbiturate and 2000mg was needed for Lethal Dose…Because Jason is an ignorant troll he scoffs and mocks this hard firm science and bluffs that I’m making it up, but any quick review will show it is seriously valid and does serve to determine Jimi’s level of lethality that was measured at his autopsy…We know the .7mg blood barbiturate level measured at Jimi’s autopsy was not fatal because Dr Teare went back and raised it as part of the cover-up…
Jason is entering booby arguments here because Vesparax contained the same Secobarbital base ingredient as Tuinol and Mandrax…The only reason it was notoriously strong was because it came in double dose tablets…Which means Jason has failed to answer the science of the tablets only containing 1800mg of Barbiturate when a person with no tolerance required 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…Jimi’s tolerance for Barbiturates was proven by his taking a hand full and not even passing out in Denmark (washed down by a pint of whiskey)…
As soon as Crompton said Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid he confirmed the wine as well as Jimi not overdosing because you can’t overdose if you were drowned…Jason trolls, but he badly fails to answer this…
Anyone of average intelligence can see Jason is having real trouble answering this and tries to compensate with bluffing, trolling, and derision…But once he did that in front of a competent moderator or jury he would be quickly sequestered…
More hot air and same troll game from a 10 year troll. “Buster” thinks useless words makes up for his non existent wine and zero evidence he can ever produce.
“Buster” has no evidence, it’s all made up garbage based on his own bogus personal opinion. He’s never posted any documented facts. Then he gets banned from every site and forum for abusive posts and trolling the real evidence.
Nobody was taking 9-10 Vesparax tablets at one setting on a regular basis and this pitiful attempt by “Buster” to claim Jimi’s dose wasn’t lethal is outright fraud. Dr. Teare and Dr. Crompton confirmed Jimi’s dose was above lethal barbiturate poisoning.
Vesparax is more powerful than any drugs that Jimi took and he took 9 plus a black bomber and drank wine at parties. Alcohol intensifies barbiturates and Jimi was slightly above the legal limit and took took a powerful amphetamine on top of it. And Buster the clown hilariously says this isn’t lethal.
Dr. Teare was not taking part in any “cover up”. Dr. Teare forensically analyzed Jimi’s body and got the results from the drugs in his system.
“Buster” is a fraud and says a “cover up” cuz this evidence destroys his dead wine hoax and he needs an excuse to still claim his imaginary wine that never existed.
Dr. Crompton said Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him. It destroyed his liver and Jimi would not have survived that lethal dose. Buster the wine troll purposely leaves this out cuz he is a fraud and a troll.
There is not one medical document that shows Jimi was “drowned”. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose and so does the autopsy report and hospital reports that Kathy read. The fluid came from the drug overdose that happened when Jimi was being suffocated by the vomit he inhaled that caused his heart to work extremely hard since he could not breathe. People who have bad hearts develop this fluid and this is a medical fact. The autopsy of Jimi’s heart showed this to be the case by the evidence left behind of the fluid and how his heart was dilated. This proves there was no phony “drowning”.
Buster’s hoax is destroyed by the fluid that was inside Jimi during the autopsy. Buster the clown and Fraud Bannister said Jimi had a “wine removal” three days earlier at the hospital. But the fluid still remained at the autopsy….oops!…This proves as well there was no phony “wine removal” cuz that fluid shouldn’t be there if Jimi was sucked dry as they claim. Fluid is not wine and no wine was ever detected. This hoax is dead as it’s always have been.
Buster uses his usual projection and phony jury scenario for his troll game but can never provide documented evidence of his fake imaginary wine. Useless words can’t give him the imaginary wine he constantly snivels for cuz it doesn’t exist.
Buster is grasping at straws, trying to remain valid and relevant in this story. No-one would be foolish enough to discredit what the doctors witnessed and reported in Jimi’s death in favour of what a tin foil hatter says and believes.
“Buster” is irrelevant and his 10 year hoax is debunked as the fraud that it is.
All “Buster” can do is make up bogus claims, distort the real evidence, and claim “cover up” when all forensic evidence refutes him. This shows he is a clown who can’t back up what he tries to claim and it’s why nobody takes him seriously on every site and forum he posts on.
“Buster” is distorting the real forensic evidence in Jimi’s death with his ridiculous alternate claims and gives his old and tired troll fantasy spiel. That’s all he can do cuz he has nothin’. His game is weak and his troll material should be retired. He has done it for 10 years and never proved anything cuz it is all a sham.
Jimi took a large number of Vesparax all at once and they caused his death; Monika took these as prescribed by her doctor over time and they did not kill her.
Jason can’t answer the hard science…Anyone who reads his answers sees they are based on bullshit blather designed to evade the facts he obviously can’t answer…The 1800mg is hard science and can’t be bullshitted around like Jason attempts…None of the excuse-making he attempts is good enough to overcome the hard fact that barbiturate science requires 2000mg of barbiturate for a person with no tolerance to overdose…Jason has entered lengthy blather but he hasn’t answered the fact that the product manufacturer for Vesparax indicated in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 to 10 tablets”…Read Jason’s trolling dithering above and you’ll see he mocks but he gives no credible answer to the fact that the manufacturer listed that tenth tablet because 9 wasn’t enough to overdose…It is a hard science fact that 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate and a person with no tolerance requires 2000mg to overdose…That’s all there is to it and Jason cannot answer it when challenged…
The bottom line is Crompton and Teare were covering-up…That’s why Teare went back and adjusted the barbiturate levels upward because he was then brought in to the cover-up on a covert defense order that is perfectly legal in Britain…The barbiturate science I posted is valid and until Teare and Crompton answer it like anyone is required it remains the going definition of Jimi’s forensics…When Jason fails to answer it he loses the debate and no amount of trolling will make up for it…
Nowhere will Jason be able to quote Crompton or Teare validly showing by science that Jimi overdosed…Jason’s claim that the fluid in Jimi’s lungs was Oedemic fluid is false…Not only was the wine Teare admitted was covering Jimi evidence that the fluid was wine but you can’t develop that much Oedemic fluid in only one or two hours…Jason tries to argue us in to accepting that Dr Bannister’s witnessing can be ignored…But the truth is Bannister witnessed what the fluid was and it was pure wine…And let’s not forget that the “cuz” troll Jason was insisting the vomit was dry vomit all the way down and now he is saying it was Oedemic fluid – which shows what that miserable piece of shit Jason’s arguments are worth…
Jason’s claim that Jimi’s liver was destroyed is just his use of dramatics…You can’t destroy someone’s liver with only 1800mg of barbiturate…
Jason’s failure to answer the hard barbiturate science is why he would quickly be ruled against by any jury or credible moderation…And the alcohol level was not “above the legal limit”…Jason is lying and cannot show any measured proof of that even though he demands it from us…The blood alcohol level was only 5mg, which is technically a trace…The 100mg Teare estimated was part of the cover-up…
Yes folks, “Buster” is the greatest “medical expert” who has ever lived. This man is incredible, he reads a few conspiracy books and makes up his own fake claims, and then he knows more than anybody on the face of the Earth.
Buster touts himself as an “expert” by reading conspiracy books and making up his own evidence in his crazy head. He will become angry and tell us “we can’t answer his good evidence” when he just made it up himself a few minutes ago. That’s how Buster rolls with his 10 year washed up troll game. Buster is in need of new material as he has worn it out beyond belief.
Buster is a man who knows nothing about forensic pathology or how the human body reacts to drug overdoses. But Buster claims he knows more than the top pathologist in London at the time, Dr. Teare, who was a renowned forensic pathologist who worked on the most important cases of the times.
“Buster” by reading conspiracy books and his own make believe fantasy of Jimi Hendrix being “drowned in wine”, claims he knows more about pathology than Dr. Teare.
Buster never examined Jimi’s body during the autopsy, but Buster has all the answers and claims to know more than Dr. Teare who did a full forensic analysis of Jimi’s body.
Buster was not there to witness what Dr. Teare found and examined, but Buster claims his imaginary wine was there and a phony “cover up” took place as he narrates his fantasy story like he was there knowing everything that happened.
Buster is a troll who knows nothing about the real facts and events. He can only distort the real record and enter his alternate fantasy claims telling us “this is how it really happened” when he was never there to witness anything.
Buster has read second hand information in books and made up his own fake claims lying about what doctors and witnesses said. From there he assembles his own time lime of phony events creating his fake hoax. Everything Buster types is phony decades later after the fact claims that are bogus since they make no sense.
Buster has no documented evidence or forensic analysis of wine but keeps claiming it anyway making up bogus after the fact scenarios that never existed.
Nothing about wine was ever detected or documented but wine troll Buster says it exists and we have to believe him or we “lost the debate”.
Buster says Vesparax manufacturers knows more than the top pathologist in London and we need to believe them instead.
Buster says you can’t overdose on 9 pills but it has to be a 10th pill for it to be lethal. Buster is a self proclaimed “world’s greatest medical expert” so we need to believe what he tells us. Maybe Buster can pop 9 pills and tell us if his theory is sound since Buster claims he can’t overdose on 9 pills.
1 pill was the prescribed dosage but it’s fine to take 9 pills according to Buster. Taking 8 more pills than the prescribed amount of 1 pill is not an overdose according to Buster. The medical genius says we can all take up to 9 pills and not overdose. Buster is the only “medical expert” in the world to make this bold statement. If people listened to Buster they would all be dead, so don’t listen to this lunatic and never take more than the prescribed amount cuz taking more is an overdose. Any doctor will tell you that and Vesprax manufacturers aren’t going to endorse taking 9 pills. Buster is an awful troll and has nothing else left to post except for this crap he makes up.
Buster’s troll game is based on absolute statements that will always fail. Claiming you can’t die from taking X amount is a bogus statement cuz anything can happen when you take X amount. People can die from taking any medication they advertise on commercials. That’s why they have all the warnings and side effects cuz people can die from it. Not one doctor in the world would make an absolute statement claiming you can’t die if you take X amount. Only a clown and a troll would be stupid enough to make that claim.
The fact is Jimi did overdose on Vesparax and Dr. Teare confirmed that in the autopsy. Crompton confirmed that to Kathy. Jimi also took a powerful amphetamine called a “black bomber” that interacted with the 9 powerful barbiturates. Mixing uppers and downers are lethal and Buster the clown the “world’s top medical chief” says it’s ok to do that cuz Jimi had a “famous tolerance” to drugs. Just bogus generic statements from a troll who has no evidence of his own to produce.
Then Buster claims all the top doctors in London to this day are taking part in a “cover up” of Jimi Hendrix. Buster is a deranged lunatic who can only make up fake claims cuz he has nothing to prove.
Dr. Crompton confirmed to Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates and it destroyed his liver. Dr. Teare found no imaginary wine in the autopsy. That destroys this bogus wine hoax.
So Buster needs to create his false reality of a cover up so he can still claim his imaginary wine. Here is how he does it folks.
In Buster’s deranged mind, he believes Jimi was “drowned in wine”, but has no evidence of it. But he believes it happened anyway and that’s how it has to be. The fact that no wine was found in the autopsy or was documented angers Buster, so he claims since no wine was ever documented or recorded, that these top doctors are taking part in a “cover up” which is totally bogus. This is how Buster still can claim his phony wine using his fake “cover up” claim since he had no evidence to prove his fake wine. This is how Buster has been trolling for 10 years with his diseased and deranged mind. Pathetic indeed as he lies his way through everything
but still never can produce documented evidence.
Buster is a clown and it’s why he is not taken seriously anywhere. Forensic science and evidence will always debunk and refute him. Buster was not there to know the facts and just reads fantasy stories claiming to be an “expert” based on that. 10 years of trolling got Buster nowhere except to get banned everywhere he posts.
BUSTER says: Jason can’t answer the hard science…Anyone who reads his answers sees they are based on bullshit blather designed to evade the facts he obviously can’t answer…The 1800mg is hard science and can’t be bullshitted around like Jason attempts…None of the excuse-making he attempts is good enough to overcome the hard fact that barbiturate science requires 2000mg of barbiturate for a person with no tolerance to overdose…Jason has entered lengthy blather but he hasn’t answered the fact that the product manufacturer for Vesparax indicated in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 to 10 tablets”…Read Jason’s trolling dithering above and you’ll see he mocks but he gives no credible answer to the fact that the manufacturer listed that tenth tablet because 9 wasn’t enough to overdose…It is a hard science fact that 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate and a person with no tolerance requires 2000mg to overdose…That’s all there is to it and Jason cannot answer it when challenged…
JASON says: “Buster” aka Albert/Brian Doyle believes a human can survive by taking 9 powerful Vesparax pills and not have any damage done to their body. So, Albert/Brian Doyle should put his bold phony claim to the test and take 9 pills to see if he overdoses. Let the big shot put his phony forensics on the line and put his money where his mouth is. Take 9 pills and let us know how it turns out since you claim a person cannot overdose on 9. Your argument is pathetic and it’s why I debunked your hoax.
BUSTER says: The bottom line is Crompton and Teare were covering-up…That’s why Teare went back and adjusted the barbiturate levels upward because he was then brought in to the cover-up on a covert defense order that is perfectly legal in Britain…The barbiturate science I posted is valid and until Teare and Crompton answer it like anyone is required it remains the going definition of Jimi’s forensics…When Jason fails to answer it he loses the debate and no amount of trolling will make up for it…
JASON says: This is more bullshit made up by this clown troll. There was nothing to “cover up” and no phony adjustments as this moron lies about. Teare got everything from the forensic analysis in Jimi’s body which proved Jii died from an overdose. There was no wine detected as Fraud Bannister claimed 20 years later.
BUSTER says: Nowhere will Jason be able to quote Crompton or Teare validly showing by science that Jimi overdosed…Jason’s claim that the fluid in Jimi’s lungs was Oedemic fluid is false…Not only was the wine Teare admitted was covering Jimi evidence that the fluid was wine but you can’t develop that much Oedemic fluid in only one or two hours…Jason tries to argue us in to accepting that Dr Bannister’s witnessing can be ignored…But the truth is Bannister witnessed what the fluid was and it was pure wine…And let’s not forget that the “cuz” troll Jason was insisting the vomit was dry vomit all the way down and now he is saying it was Oedemic fluid – which shows what that miserable piece of shit Jason’s arguments are worth…
JASON says: Crompton already told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi had a lethal overdose. That is documented and published in her book. Dr. Teare told the inquest that Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning and that is documented into evidence.
Buster aka Albert/Brian Doyle is a lying fraud troll. Dr. Teare never found any imaginary wine and never “admitted” anything. That makes Fraud Bannister a liar since no “pure wine” was dvr found or documented anywhere.
Ambulance Men John Saua and Reginal Jones testified to witnessing and sucking out dry vomit all the way down.
This lying troll has been exposed once again.
BUSTER says: Jason’s claim that Jimi’s liver was destroyed is just his use of dramatics…You can’t destroy someone’s liver with only 1800mg of barbiturate…
JASON says: This is not “my claim”. This is documented results on Jimi’s autopsy that his liver was destroyed from the 9 Vesparax pills. Crompton confirmed this to Kathy and this is documented.
Well, why don’t you take 9 powerful barbiturate pills and let us know how your liver turns out “Mr. medical expert” who doesn’t know your ass from a hole in the ground.
BUSTER says: Jason’s failure to answer the hard barbiturate science is why he would quickly be ruled against by any jury or credible moderation…And the alcohol level was not “above the legal limit”…Jason is lying and cannot show any measured proof of that even though he demands it from us…The blood alcohol level was only 5mg, which is technically a trace…The 100mg Teare estimated was part of the cover-up…
JASON says: Jimi’s autopsy clearly shows he was above the legal limit and this troll can only lie and claim a “cover up” cuz it refutes his bogus claim.
Buster the fraud makes up his fake “science”.
Any jury would see this troll is a fraud and would uicly convict him on all counts.
Same troll game from this clown, deny, add fake evidence, use his fake jury scenario, claims he knows more than anybody else, attack the other person.
Very weak and this troll has done it for 10 years.
Well said Jason, The recommended dose for Vesparax is half a tablet so if Jimi took nine then it’s reasonable to assume this is a lethal dose. Only a fool would fail to see and understand that. The dose Jimi took was so toxic that it destroyed his liver and caused him to pass out quickly choking on his own vomit which eventually killed him. What the coroner couldn’t be certain of is why Jimi took so many. But he certainly stood by Dr. Teare’s report being the experienced and renowned pathologist that he was as did Dr. Crompton years later.
Dr. Teare’s forensic analysis of Jimi’s body proved it was a lethal overdose. Dr Crompton confirmed that it was a lethal to Kathy 20 years later when he read that same report. Of course taking 9 pills of that magnitude is lethal and Buster the clown only can pathetically pretend that it is not. Let’s see Buster take 9 pills to prove his phony forensics.
Buster has not put forth a valid argument for his hoax.
All Buster can do is claim that the “drugs did not kill Jimi cuz he did not take enough to die”. That is a bogus argument when all the forensic evidence says it was a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him.
Then Buster invents his imaginary wine that does not exist except it was told by a doctor who was convicted for 3 counts of fraud and sued for medical malpractice in 1992. This is the man that Buster uses as his “evidence”, a fraud doctor who never documented all this “massive wine” he claims that was never detected during Jimi’s autopsy. That’s why this is all a hoax.
Buster tries his hardest to deny the drugs that killed Jimi and tries to place fake imaginary wine that nobody ever witnessed at the flat or was forensically analyzed on Jimi’s body. This means wine never existed cuz it was just a bogus made up 1992 claim by Fraud Bannister.
In 1970, the day Jimi died on 18th of September, St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose to the world. Not one word about imaginary wine and Bannister was the doctor who signed off on that report cuz he was the doctor who pronounced Hendrix dead. This was confirmed by the hospital that day and we can easily see Bannister’s phony claims in January of 1992 are after the fact made up claims.
Buster can only deny the drugs that killed Jimi, he has no evidence of any imaginary wine. Buster’s own hoax is to deny the confirmed drug overdose and to replace it with fake wine that doesn’t exist. This is why he has no evidence to produce and why he works so hard in long winded posts trying to distort and discredit the confirmed cause of Jimi’s death with his garbage claims.
Forensic analysis does not lie and Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him. No wine was detected in Jimi’s lungs and that ends this bogus hoax.
Buster is asking us to put aside all that evidence of an overdose in favour of murder. As if.
Exactly Ivana.
“Buster” aka Albert/Brian Doyle suppresses and smears the real evidence in favor of his fake made up nonsense he says is “hard evidence” that he pushes for his dead hoax.
Our “world famous medical expert” Buster the clown, needs to tell us that Janis Joplin couldn’t have died from a herion overdose cuz she had a “famous tolerance” to heroin. This joker who is no expert at anything, can only make bogus absolute statements in which he has knowledge of drugs and the effects on the human body. Even a doctor wouldn’t make an absurd comment like that. Buster then hilariously says “I haven’t answered this or that” when I already have numerous times and debunked his garbage. After the real forensic evidence refutes Buster, he goes back to his troll playbook of claiming a “cover up” which makes him look even more foolish than he already does. Same troll game he’s played for 10 years. You’d think he would be tired of it by now.
BUSTER says: Jason can’t answer the hard science…
JASON says: Buster means the bullshit he makes up for his hoax. Everything that I’ve posted is documented forensic evidence that is confirmed science from Jimi’s offical autopsy that refutes Buster’s hoax .
BUSTER says: Anyone who reads his answers sees they are based on bullshit blather designed to evade the facts he obviously can’t answer…The 1800mg is hard science and can’t be bullshitted around like Jason attempts…None of the excuse-making he attempts is good enough to overcome the hard fact that barbiturate science requires 2000mg of barbiturate for a person with no tolerance to overdose…Jason has entered lengthy blather but he hasn’t answered the fact that the product manufacturer for Vesparax indicated in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 to 10 tablets”…Read Jason’s trolling dithering above and you’ll see he mocks but he gives no credible answer to the fact that the manufacturer listed that tenth tablet because 9 wasn’t enough to overdose…It is a hard science fact that 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate and a person with no tolerance requires 2000mg to overdose…That’s all there is to it and Jason cannot answer it when challenged…
JASON says: Buster’s phony opinion and fake science is refuted by real science and the forensic autopsy of Jimi Hendrix that showed he died of a lethal overdose that included 9 Vesparax and a powerful amphetamine. Buster’s bogus claim is that “Jimi couldn’t have died from the pills”. Well, Jimi did die from the pills and its a documented fact which the autopsy proves. Real forensic science defeats phony claims from a 10 year wine troll who makes bogus absolute statements trying to claim imaginary wine. Everyone reading knows “Buster” is a troll pushing a hoax.
BUSTER says: The bottom line is Crompton and Teare were covering-up…That’s why Teare went back and adjusted the barbiturate levels upward because he was then brought in to the cover-up on a covert defense order that is perfectly legal in Britain…The barbiturate science I posted is valid and until Teare and Crompton answer it like anyone is required it remains the going definition of Jimi’s forensics…When Jason fails to answer it he loses the debate and no amount of trolling will make up for it…
JASON says: Buster makes his phony “cover up” claim cuz the real forensic evidence refutes his bogus hoax so he needs to fraudulently discredit famous doctors. Everything Teare documented came from the body of Jimi Hendrix with the exact accurate forensic numbers. Buster the clown is a troll and has no evidence of his fake “cover up” and the imaginary wine he snivels for but can never produce. 10 years and this clown keeps up with the same nonsense.
BUSTER says: Nowhere will Jason be able to quote Crompton or Teare validly showing by science that Jimi overdosed…Jason’s claim that the fluid in Jimi’s lungs was Oedemic fluid is false…Not only was the wine Teare admitted was covering Jimi evidence that the fluid was wine but you can’t develop that much Oedemic fluid in only one or two hours…Jason tries to argue us in to accepting that Dr Bannister’s witnessing can be ignored…But the truth is Bannister witnessed what the fluid was and it was pure wine…And let’s not forget that the “cuz” troll Jason was insisting the vomit was dry vomit all the way down and now he is saying it was Oedemic fluid – which shows what that miserable piece of shit Jason’s arguments are worth…
JASON says: Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal drug overdose. Dr. Teare confirmed at the inquest that Jimi Hendrix died from barbiturate poisoning. Dr. Thurston confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose in his final report. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose with their official statement to the media. John Saua and Reginal the ambulance men who tended to Jimi comfirmed an overdose as well. As did Officer Ian Smith and Dr. Bob Brown. Not one word about imaginary wine from any of these professionals. No wine was ever detected amywhere inside or outside of Jimi Hendrix during the autopsy. Buster the clown makes his fake claims of a “cover up” cuz he desperately wants his fake wine to be there and is angry it wasn’t so he fraudulently says “cover up” cuz he is a troll. Teare never “admitted” anything about fake imaginary wine. This is another lie from this wine turd.
Janis Joplin died of an overdose of illegal drugs while Jimi died of an overdose of prescription drugs. The end result unfortunately was the same leading to both their deaths.
Our “world famous medical expert” Buster the clown, makes more bogus absolute statements saying a liver can’t be destroyed when Jimi Hendrix took a lethal overdose of 9 Vesparax pills. Well, the forensic results of Jimi’s autopsy proved that his liver was destroyed, so Buster is full of shit as always. If “Buster” still disagrees with the official Hendrix forensic autopsy document, then Buster can pop 9 pills of that quantity and he can see how his liver turns out after a couple of hours.
BUSTER says: Jason’s claim that Jimi’s liver was destroyed is just his use of dramatics…You can’t destroy someone’s liver with only 1800mg of barbiturate…
JASON says: The autopsy proved it did and Dr. Crompton confirmed Jimi’s liver was destroyed. Buster makes bogus absolute statements when the forensics refutes him.
BUSTER says: Jason’s failure to answer the hard barbiturate science is why he would quickly be ruled against by any jury or credible moderation…And the alcohol level was not “above the legal limit”…Jason is lying and cannot show any measured proof of that even though he demands it from us…The blood alcohol level was only 5mg, which is technically a trace…The 100mg Teare estimated was part of the cover-up…
JASON says: A judge and jury would convict Buster of fraud and he would be hauled off to jail for his patheic lies, distortion, and fraudulent smearing of the real evidence and the record. Teare confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose and his alcohol level was above the legal limit through forensic analysis. I’ve already posted this many times. Buster needs to discredit the real evidence so he can push his bogus dead hoax with his phony claims of a “cover up” and imaginary wine that doesn’t exist.
You see folks, this is what a troll does who has no evidence to produce. A troll can only deny and discredit the real evidence and replace it with outright lies, bogus opinions, fantasy scenarios, and fraudulent claims. But still the troll can’t produce any documentation or evidence for the garbage he peddles since it’s all make believe and never happened. This is why Buster can only narrate a fake story and never can post any real evidence and documentation, it’s all made up by him and he has nothing real to
show.
Just look how potent the barbiturates Jimi took actually were. He passed out so quickly he didn’t even get the chance to undress and get into bed. They caused him to choke on his own vomit while unconscious and then they further damaged his liver. He also had a collapsed lung. Jimi took a high dose of the Vesparax which killed him. Jimi also had other drugs in his system together with the wine he drank earlier in the evening. Dr. Teare concentrated on these things during the autopsy and determined that Jimi died of barbiturate intoxication not alcohol or other substances.
These medical professionals do a great job at determining what caused someone’s death. Yet here they are being made to look like corrupt individuals who falsify findings after they were coerced into changing them. Talk about a smear campaign. What Buster is offering up is not evidence but his own take on the events surrounding Jimi’s death not to be confused with what really happened that morning.
The fact of the matter is “Buster” doesn’t like Jimi’s autopsy results so he lies and says a “cover up” fraudulently smearing the legacy one of the best pathologists in history, Donald Teare, who worked on many famous cases and made great medical discoveries.
Buster only uses his useless words to make his bogus lying comments to keep his debunked hoax going. Dr. Teare never took part in any “cover up” cuz there was nothing to cover up for Jimi Hendrix. St. Mary Abbots Hospital already documented and confirmed to the media on 9/18/70 that Jimi died from a drug overdose. Dr. Teare was put on the case cuz he was the best pathologist at the time and wanted his expertise to determine exactly how Jimi died and what drugs he took.
There was no imaginary wine involved or detected in Jimi’s lungs or in his stomach. No wine was found on his skin either which proves Jimi was not “covered in wine”. “Buster” fraudulently lies saying that Dr. Teare “admitted” there was wine. This is an outright lie. Nothing about wine was ever documented anywhere for Jimi Hendrix. The fake imaginary wine claims started in 1992 with Fraud Bannister.
It’s disgraceful that some troll like “Buster” goes around on the internet making up blatant lies trying to destroy the legacy of famous doctors all cuz “Buster” doesn’t like the autopsy results wanting there to be wine and for Jimi to be “murdered”. Only a lunatic would do such a thing.
There was no “cover up” by any doctor and this wine troll “Buster” can only lie smearing the autopsy results and the evidence with his fantasy scenarios and fraudulent lies cuz he had nothing to prove with no evidence of his own.
Spot on, Jason.
Jimi died from a drug overdose and there was nothing to “cover up”. 20 years later Kathy Etchingham went to see Dr. Rufus Crompton to get his opinion on what the autopsy report confirmed back in 1970. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him and he had no chance to survive cuz his liver was destroyed. Not one word about imaginary wine was mentioned since it did not exist. Dr. Crompton had nothing to do with Jimi’s autopsy in 1970. Kathy sought him out to verify the findings of Jimi’s autopsy. Crompton just read to her what Teare wrote from 1970. Crompton had nothing to “cover up” 20 years after Jimi’s death. This is a bogus claim by “Buster” to push his hoax. “Buster” does not like the accurate forensic analysis in autopsy so he says “cover up” as an easy way to discredit the official results. “Buster” wants to believe there is imaginary wine, and no wine ever existed which makes him angry, so he says “cover up” so he can still claim wine and push his bogus hoax. This is how “Buster” runs his failed hoax.
Hi Ivana,
Our “friend” “Buster” was posting his phony “Hendrix Murder” propaganda at another forum called “Deep Politics Forum”. As usual, he was posting under another pseudonym calling himself “Albert Doyle” when his name is Brian Doyle. Not sure the reason for that, but he was using another fake name to push his hoax.
Doesn’t this garbage sound like Brian Doyle aka “Buster”?
Albert Doyle: The British Government had all the proof it needed for murder in its possession back in fall 1970. While Jimi was soaked in wine and had “bottles worth” evacuated from his lungs and stomach in the St Mary Abott’s Hospital Resuscitation Room the autopsy recorded only a 5mg per 100ml blood alcohol content which was incommensurate with the wine witnessed in and around Jimi.
Albert Doyle: I suspect Jeffery said he shoved pills down Hendrix’s throat followed by wine because Hendrix’s murder was a very sophisticated intelligence assassination operation that involved other people – possibly including Monika Dannemann.
Albert Doyle: Hendrix died because he took as many as nine German Vesparax sleeping tablets that were 3 times stronger than normal sleeping pills. The company that made them discontinued them 2 years after Jimi’s death. I believe these extra-strong sleeping pill barbiturates were subtly placed in Jimi’s environment as part of an intel assassination operation. This method of “accidental death” has the subtle fingerprint of intel on it because of this. Jimi was meant to take those pills and pass-out on them.
Albert Doyle: Jimi was waterboarded to death in combination with barbiturates several hours after telling his lawyer he was firing Jeffery. Not only was this uninvestigated by the British Government, but to this day we are told Jimi Hendrix was a casualty of 60’s drug abuse and died from a self-induced drug overdose.
Albert Doyle: The long and the short of it is Michael Jeffery was MI-6. He found himself in a prime infiltration spot for the 60’s as Jimi’s manager. I have good reason to believe Jeffery was accessed by intel and couldn’t say no. When Jimi fired him his decision was forced. Jeffery reverted back to his intel training and you know the rest from there.
Albert Doyle: Just to prove how under the grip of intel propaganda and evil Wikipedia is they just updated their Monika Dannemann entry to include the pure crap Caesar Glebbeek offered in his publication ‘Until We Meet Again’. If you scroll up in this thread you can see I’ve already torn it apart. I have even more information I can’t release just now that even further disproves it.
Albert Doyle: I can say I’ve spoken to several top US forensic experts and they said Caesar’s arguments are laughable and don’t comprise anything close to the conclusive evidence he claims they are.
Albert Doyle: I’ve done extensive research on this.
Albert Doyle: I am the foremost authority on the murder of Jimi Hendrix.
JASON says: Here we have the same phony claims of a “cover up” that “Buster” makes with zero evidence.
Bogus claims of imaginary wine that doesn’t exist.
Phony claims of intelligence murder and Jeffery being in MI6.
Same bogus claims of Monika Dannemann being in intelligence.
Same phony “waterboarding murder”.
Same fake claims of talking to people off camera and receiving “incredible information”.
Bragging of being a “foremost authority” and doing “extensive research”.
New contradicting claims based on speculation, lies, innuendos, false claims, lies, ans made up stories.
All of these bogus claims is the same propaganda this troll “Buster” has been pushing for a decade. There was no wine, no murder, Jimi didn’t fire Jeffery, there was no “cover up”, no intelligence operation. Just pure b.s. propaganda made up to push a dead hoax.
Albert Doyle sure sounds a lot like “Buster” aka Brian Doyle. Why is he using “Albert Doyle” as his name on the forum?
Hi Jason, Great stuff here. I’ve come across the name Albert Doyle before and there’s no mistaking that it’s Buster. Maybe he wants people to think he is a different person just like he does on other forums by using various pseudonyms. It’s obvious that it’s all made up by the way Buster etc keeps changing his story to suit his needs depending on the forum he is on. You can’t have two conflicting truths when Buster keeps pushing his murder hoax. It’s obvious he’s making it up as he goes along. This is just a weird story invented by a hoaxer who no-one takes seriously. LOL.
Perhaps that’s the case, but the “Doyle” and the same exact writing style is a dead giveaway it is the same person.
“Buster” aka Brian/Albert Doyle changes his stories when one is debunked or when he tries to “win a debate”.
A perfect example is the imaginary wine that doesn’t exist. He claims Jimi was “forced drowned in wine”, but when you point out to him that no trauma was found during the autopsy which would indicate trauma with wine being forced, he changed his claim that “no one would need to force wine into Jimi” as he trolls along trying to “win a debate”.
Another is his fake “hard plug of vomit” and phony “wine removal claim”. For years he has written that Fraud Bannister is the only doctor to remove the imaginary wine. He also stated that Fraud Bannister removed the fake “hard plug of vomit” himself. Then after I wrote the first two parts of my Bannister series debunking his hoax, he completely changed his story to Dr. Siefert removing “the fake hard plug of vomit” before Bannister got there and then helped remove the fake imaginary wine. Just more blatant lies and purposeful changing of fake stories that makes this hoax the fraud that it is.
No real story can keep changing all the time depending on when “Buster” wants it to.
No real story can have all have all these various plots and scenarios with different ways he and others make their phony “murder” claim.
You’re right that nobody takes him seriously, which is why he creates fake user names to agree with himself on forums/sites to make it appear he has support.This guy is mentally off who goes to great lengths to push this fraud “murder” hoax.
Jason, you nailed it when you said no real story can keep changing all the time. When Buster is cornered he comes up with new things to get himself out of a tight spot. Just look at all the names Buster has used; Scrum Drum, Flyswatter, Jet Blast, Brian/Albert Doyle. I realised that Brian was all these other people just by reading his long winded rants on other sites. His arguments are all similar in content and style; it’s all part of the deception and hoax.
Here we have another major contradiction from our wine troll “Buster” who makes 2 different claims for the pills being inside Jimi. How can you have 2 different claims when there can only be 1? When you are a troll like “Buster”, he can make up whatever he wants for his hoax.
“Buster” as Albert Doyle:
On further research, there is every reason to believe Jimi took those pills himself thinking they were weaker Tuinols. Jimi’s New York doctor said Jimi called him from the Samarkand Hotel to consult him on his insomnia. The doctor offered to arrange a London prescription for sleeping pills but Jimi advised “No, I have some ‘Tuinols’ here”. So there’s good reason to believe Jimi took the pills on his own that night. So if Jeffery confessed he “shoved pills down Jimi’s throat” I believe he did so in order to hide the fact Jimi was set-up as part of a black operation that involved others. As a matter of fact Jeffery might have known serious players were getting cooler towards him and confessed in order to take the heat off them and save himself.
“Buster” as Brian Doyle:
The pills the murderers shoved down Jimi’s throat.
JASON says: So, on another forum “Buster” posting as “Albert Doyle”, says “Jimi took the pills on his own. Then he makes up a phony intelligence operation headed by Michael Jeffery to make his hoax sound really sinister.
Then on here posting as “Buster” he says “murderers shoved pills down Jimi’s throat.
Two different claims which is why this troll is pushing a hoax,
“Buster” debunks his own hoax and Tappy Wright’s bullshit claim since on another forum he said Jimi took the pills on his own, which he did. There would be no need for any imaginary wine since the powerful Vesparax pills were lethal to kill Jimi. This was documented on Jimi’s autopsy and confirmed by both Dr. Teare and Dr. Thurston. Dr. Crompton confirmed this to Kathy 20 years later and no wine was ever documented anywhere.
More contradictions from a troll who debunks his own hoax. Hilarious!
Hi Jason. I think Buster is the author of that obscene Rebuttal to Caesar Glebbeek in response to Until We Meet Again.
Hi Ivana, he most likely is and that sounds like something Buster would do as I’ve read his posts attacking Caesar. Where did he post the obscene rebuttal?
It’s a piece where Caesar is referred to as Private Boulder. I read it a couple of years ago but didn’t get very far because of the language in it. I don’t remember the name of the site though.
That sounds like something “Buster” would write. He wrote a rebuttal to Caesar posting as “Albert Doyle” on the Deep Politics Forum so the other rebuttal is him as well. Not sure who else would post rebuttals on this subject besides him.
A friend of Janis Joplin, Peggy Caserta has written a biography about her in which she says that she doesn’t think Janis died of a heroin overdose but from slipping on carpet in her room, breaking her nose and asphyxiating. This coming 50 years after Janis died. These people must be in denial about how toxic their lifestyles and habits actually are. From my reading Jimi was not an addict by he did take drugs there is no denying that. On the day before his death he had been out with Monika most of the day, bumping into friends including Kathy and then attending two parties until early in the morning. Jimi presumably drank wine and took some drugs at these gatherings as revealed in Dr. Teare’s autopsy results. When he returned to the Samarkand with Monika he took nine very strong sleeping pills which unfortunately caused his death. Nothing in Dr. Teare’s report suggested that Jimi died from anything other than the Vesparax in his system. The amount of alcohol was so insignificant that it did not contribute to Jimi’s death.
I guess Peggy missed the fact that Janis had several fresh needle tracks in her arm.
Well said Ivana
Ho Ho Ho!
I figure “Buster” aka Albert/Brian Doyle would believe in an imaginary magical figure like Santa Claus, since he believes in imaginary magic wine that appears on Jimi Hendrix when he wants it to.
“Buster” has told many lies throughout the holiday season and throughout the year, so he will be getting a lump of coal next week for lying and making up fake stories for his phony Jimi Hendrix “Murder Hoax”. A turd would be more like it cuz that’s what his hoax has been for 10 years.
One of these lies is when “Buster” aka Albert/Brian Doyle said “Jimi didn’t die from a drug overdose”. Another one was the fraudulent lie when Albert/Brian said “Crompton confirmed wine in Jimi’s lungs”. Then finally, he had the nerve to say Jimi’s liver wasn’t destroyed from the 9 Vesparax pills he took. What a lying fraud.
Well, as I have said for months, forensic science and documented evidence will always debunk and refute all the phony claims made up by hoaxers. And there is more documented evidence to debunk “Buster’s” lies.
Kathy Etchingham did an extensive investigation and learned significant information that debunks these hoaxers fraud claims and proved Jimi died from an overdose. She had that confirmation from reading Jimi’s medical report and the official autopsy report. And she received confirmation from Dr. Rufus Crompton that Jimi Hendrix died from a lethal drug overdose that she published in her book. Albert/Brian Doyle purposely leaves out the important information that confirms the drug overdose and uses the fake claim of “fluid means wine” instead to push his debunked hoax. That’s what a troll does.
To debunk “Buster’s” hoax even more, here is the exact account from Kathy Etchingham herself as what she described in her published book “Through Gypsy Eyes” telling us what Dr. Rufus Crompton told her. Take it away Kathy!
“Through Gypsy Eyes” by Kathy Etchingham:
“Donald Teare, the man who had actually done the autopsy on Jimi, was dead so we needed to talk to another expert. Dr Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School had worked with Professor Teare. We gave him a copy of the autopsy report and asked how, in his opinion, Jimi had died.
‘He would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway,’ he told us. ‘The fact that he vomited and inhaled the vomit just hastened it. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it.”
JASON says: Well, well, well “Buster’s” aka Albert/Brian Doyle’s lies have been exposed for the fraud that is is courtesy of Kathy Etchingham who did excellent work getting the information to confirm Jimi’s drug overdose.
As I have been stating all along, Jimi died from a lethal overdose that was confirmed since 9/18/70 when St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed it to the media and to the public the day he died.
Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham directly that “Jimi would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway”. This confirms the dose Jimi took was lethal. Buster the fraud was lying telling us the “dose was not lethal and Jimi had a ‘famous tolerance’ to drugs so he couldn’t have died from from the pills, it had to be the wine”. Well, no wine was ever documented or mentioned, so we know there is no imaginary wine. Dr. Crompton just told Kathy that the pills killed Jimi, so the drug overdose is once again confirmed, and Buster is full of shit as usual, as his hoax is more roasted than chestnuts on an open fire.
Dr. Crompton goes on to say that the fact Jimi inhaled the vomit made him die faster. Jimi still would have died even if he didn’t inhale the vomit cuz the barbituates killed his liver. And our “famous medical expert” Buster the clown aka Albert/Brian Doyle told us that nobody could die from taking 9 Vesparax especially Jimi Hendrix who he said had a “famous tolerance to drugs”. Well, the tolerance here doesn’t matter, what matters is the toxic amount of pills in one setting that destroys organs inside the body. Crompton confirmed the pills killed Jimi but the inhalation of vomit made his die sooner. The fact is that Jimi still would have died from taking 9 pills. Anybody with common sense knows that, but Buster as desperate as he is to deny the drugs that killed Jimi, had to make an absurd ridiculous claim that makes him look like a true moronic fool.
And finally, Crompton confirms the pills destroyed Jimi’s liver cuz the reading was too high and he wouldn’t have survived that dose. Our “famous medical expert” Buster aka Albert/Brian Doyle who graduated from The Three Stooges School of Medicine, told us that “Jimi had a famous tolerance to drugs” and couldn’t die from 9 pills. He also said that the Vesparax manufacturers said “nobody died from 9 pills and there needs to be a 10th pill”. He also said 9 pills couldn’t destroy a person’s liver. Well, real forensics, the human body, overdose of powerful medication, and plain old common sense refutes this troll and shows him to be full of shit as he will always be. Imagine “Buster” claiming to be a “forensic expert” and saying “nobody has ever touched his “forensics” and “forensic timeline” for 10 years. What a crock and it goes to show you just how mentally deranged he is. His bogus made up “forensics” has been easily destroyed and I’m thrilled to have done it.
Dr. Rufus Crompton confirmed Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed his liver and the inhaled vomit made him die faster. Jimi still would have died from this lethal amount. No fake imaginary wine was ever documented or confirmed, as it has always been about drugs. Fraud Bannister made his lies in 1992 and is a convicted fraud doctor so his word is no good and he was proven to be a fraud again. Wine troll Buster has been debunked and proven to be a fraud again as well since there is no wine and a drug overdose was officially confirmed once again. Buster’s imaginary wine has failed him just like his faith in Santa Claus bringing him a present since the wine and Santa does not exist. Both are a fairy tales in a land of make believe.
Hi Jason. Love the Three Stooges School of Medicine. Jimi’s alcohol reading was so insignificant that it didn’t even warrant a mention on the death certificate. And we both know the reason because it didn’t cause Jimi’s death the barbiturate levels did.
Buster comments as Scrum Drum in 2015 regarding Jimi on a site about BB King who his daughters think was murdered. This guy is everywhere and anywhere he can spread his hoax story.
Yeah he turns up on several of the comments section on various sites peddling his hoax. He also has posted on music sites causing trouble until he was banned.
Hi Ivana,
I read a book a while back called “Hendrix London” by William Saunders. It’s a pretty good book and he does a good job of debunking this phony “murder hoax”. Here is an excerpt from the book.
“Hendrix London” by William Saunders
“The pathologist, Professor Donald Teare, gave the cause of Jimi’s death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate poisoning. This meant that Jimi did not die because he vomited in his sleep, but vomited because he was already dying. It is a subtlety that is easy to miss.” Hendrix London p. 138 William Saunders
“The two-man ambulance crew found the door of the hotel room open and Jimi lying on the bed, covered in vomit, “vomit of all colours, black and brown, all over him and all over the pillow,” one of the ambulance crew told Kathy Etchingham more than twenty years later. Jimi appeared lifeless; an aspirator was fetched from the ambulance, but he could not be revived. The ambulance crew called for the police over the radio, and two beat officers arrived.”
“It is here that corners were cut. The beat officers should have called in a detective. Rather than face a day of filling in forms and trace the next of kin, however the police constables, persuaded the ambulance crew to take Jimi’s body to the hospital and have him admitted as an emergency. When the ambulance arrived at the hospital, Jimi was pronounced dead by the doctor on duty and sent straight to the mortuary.” p.136
William Saunders is a journalist and poet and a regular contributor to the Guardian and the Independent. He has also written for the Daily Express, Just Seventeen, the London Evening Standard, Men’s Health, the Observer, the Times, and the Times Literary Review. He is based in London.
JASON says: These three paragraphs debunk the entire phony “murder hoax”.
No imaginary wine is mentioned. Jimi was dying from the drugs, which Dr. Teare confirmed was barbiturate poisoning at the inquest, and Dr. Crompton confirmed to Kathy that the barbiturates destroyed Jimi’s liver making him not able to survive. The vomit was from the lethal overdose.
No fake and phony “hard plug of vomit removal” or the bogus “wine removal” that Fraud Bannister and hoaxers lied about. Jimi was dead for hours and was pronounced dead on arrival at the hospital and then shipped off to the morgue like it was reported in 1970. We both said doctors don’t perform phony procedures on a dead 7 hour corpse and here it is confirmed again in the book. This is what happened in 1970. Fraud Bannister made up his lies of fake wine in 1992.
Hi Jason, Thanks for sharing, the bit about Jimi vomiting because he was dying is pretty conclusive. We both know this story really well and nothing anyone says will convince us that Jimi was murdered. Just like the doctors said Jimi was beyond help and couldn’t be saved. William Saunders sounds like a very experienced journalist who has done his homework and confirms and agrees with the official and original findings.
When Jimi returned to the Samarkand Hotel with Monika from Kameron’s place it’s clear that she was the one who offered Jimi her Vesparax since he wouldn’t have known where Monika kept these. She told her brother that Jimi wanted to sleep for over a day and that’s the reason he took so many. Jimi passed out very quickly as the ambulance officers found him fully clothed on top of the bed covered in dry vomit. Monika says she woke up 9.00 am that morning and couldn’t wake Jimi up. Kathy’s investigation however uncovered that Jimi died in the early hours of the morning and there was a delay in calling the ambulance by five hours. It’s pretty obvious Monika tried to cover her tracks by concocting the time she woke up as Eric Burdon received a phone call from her in the early hours of the morning presumably a short time after they both arrived back at the Samarkand Hotel.
Here is more from that phone call to Burdon from Dannemann.
During an interview published by Earth magazine in December 1970, Burdon stated:
“When Monika phoned, I said he would be okay, but later told her to get an ambulance. I thought he would be alright by then, but that was that.” In 1991, while conducting an investigation of her own, Etchingham recorded a phone conversation during which Burdon stated: “I was fucking out of my mind. I’d just finished a gig at Ronnie Scott’s. I was in bed … and I got this telephone call from [Dannemann] … I said he’s just stoned, I said just wake him up. I said just pour some coffee down his face and slap him around and wake him up. And then I went back to bed. It was early morning when I got the call, in fact I thought it was earlier than early morning … in the early hours. Then I got this alarm bell ringing in my head, and I woke up and sat up and went, ‘Wait a minute, something’s wrong here’. I called her back, and I had to yell and scream in order for her to get an ambulance.”
JASON says: The delay in calling the ambulance is verified by Burdon when he had to scream at Monika for her to call for an ambulance.
Also, notice Burdon told Monika to pour coffee down Jimi’s face to wake him up. The hoaxers then claimed she was pouring wine on Jimi as part of a sinister plot to cover up for the phony “murder” that never happened.
Monika did lie about time and changed her story. “Buster” the man of many pseudonyms said Monika was a “special secret intelligence agent” which is hilarious cuz she was just a drugged out groupie and couldn’t even keep her stories straight.
Hi Jason, The coffee might explain why the vomit was brown and black in colour.
Hi Ivana,
There was nothing red in color that was described by any witness who was at the flat. Gallons of red wine spilled all over the bed would easily be seen and would be the first thing noticed and described by whoever saw it. Once again, this proves there was no phony wine drowning or “homicide scene”. The black color could be the coffee or most likely the vomit color from the lethal overdose from the barbiturate poisoning.
Thought I would post this ridiculous review of a 1968 Jimi Hendrix concert. Can’t believe
this guy wrote this. The Tribune should have gotten somebody else to review the show.
Nov. 3, 1968: A bad Jimi Hendrix experience
MUSIC REVIEW
Jimi Hendrix Show Plays at Auditorium
By ALLAN HOLBERT
Minneapolis Tribune Staff Writer
The Jimi Hendrix show at the Minneapolis Auditorium Saturday night was billed as “an experience,” and that’s a good name for it. It was an experience, an undesirable one.
For those of you who are not yet aware of this shining new talent, Jimi Hendrix could be best described as a black Elvis Presley.
That is to say, he doesn’t sing too well, and he doesn’t play his white guitar too well, but he does have a lot of sex.
HE HAS long hair. He wears a pink, flowery shirt and pink pants and white shoes. He twists and moves around a lot as he sings and caresses his guitar.
So his talent is really not significant and neither is that of something called [Mother] Cat and the all night newsboys, the rock band that preceded Hendrix before intermission.
The things that made the Hendrix experience an experience was the behavior of the love-oriented (remember) hippie types in all their conforming nonconformist costumes who crowded and forced themselves up to the front of the stage when Hendrix came on.
THE MUSIC by Hendrix and his two white sidemen was loud but not too clear. Among his songs were “Foxy Lady” and “Are You Experienced”.
People sitting in the balcony probably had no trouble seeing Hendrix. For those sitting up front it was quite difficult because of those rude, smelly long-haired kids who pushed their way up to the stage, completely intimidating law officers and Andy Frain ushers.
It was possible to see if you stood up, but Jimi Hendrix isn’t worth standing up for.
Dumb. Jimi was hardly a shining new talent by late 1968; he was huge by then with a couple of albums released already. This guy has no idea, and those smelly hippies he talks about were responsible for a lot of positive social change in the 60’s.
Last night I watched a behind the scenes documentary about Woodstock. Would you believe the organisers were expecting a crowd of 25,000 and 500,000 turned up. At one point they ran out of food and the locals kindly donated their food. Everyone commented about the positive vibe of the place and the people. The doco started with the prominent figures of the time who sort to bring about social change like John and Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King. The focus then shifted to the music and the groups, and lastly Jimi’s performance of the Star Spangled Banner which contrasted with the serenity of the three day festival; it was about the reality of America’s involvement in the Viet Nam war.
(Season’s Greetings! Well here is another edition of all the lies and phony claims that “Buster” aka Albert/Brian Doyle pushes for his fake “Hendrix Murder Hoax”. Buster has been caught in many lies and changing of stories during his many “debates” over the past 10 years. That’s how we all know Buster is fraud running a hoax. These fake claims are what he has used for his phony myth he calls “evidence”. None of this stuff is confirmed or real documented evidence. It’s just a bunch of phony absurd claims and theories too ridiculous to believe told by fraud sources or made up in Buster’s crazy head. Here we go with the next 5 phony claims in this Second Edition.)
“The Ridiculous And Asinine Debunked Claims That Buster Uses For His Phony And Made Up Jimi Hendrix ‘Murder’ Hoax”
Second Edition
By Jason
#1. Dr. Bob Brown witnessed wine on Jimi Hendrix
Doctor Bob Brown was the first doctor to witness Jimi Hendrix being wheeled into the hospital by the ambulance men. Brown has never stated anywhere that he witnessed “wine” on Jimi Hendrix. This of course is another lie made up by Buster the clown aka Albert/Brian Doyle to push his bogus wine hoax. Dr. Bob Brown did say that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose which was confirmed by the St. Mary Abbots Hospital statement to the media and by the autopsy and final inquest report. Since Dr. Brown witnessed no wine that backs up the testimony by all three main witnesses at the flat, ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones along with Officer Ian Smith who witnessed no wine at the flat. No wine at the flat was ever documented or witnessed and we have a doctor who saw Jimi first who saw no wine on him. Again, this proves that no wine was seen on Hendrix in 1970 and the phony wine claims started with Fraud Bannister in January of 1992.
#2. Jimi had half hour procedures performed on him to remove wine from his lungs
Here is the main phony claim from our fraud “Buster” which is easily debunked from the start. No hospital reports or documentation exists of this fake wine removal on Jimi Hendrix. Hospitals document everything and since no documentation exists that means these fake “procedures” never happened. Jimi Hendrix was a dead 7 hour decomposing corpse when he reached the hospital and was declared dead on arrival. Several hour dead bodies don’t have “procedures” performed on them which proves this bogus claim to be fake. Also, there was no wine ever documented in Jimi’s autopsy and there was fluid and a rice meal extracted from Hendrix during the autopsy. If this fake “procedure” happened under Bannister the fluid and rice wouldn’t have been there for the autopsy. The evidence of fluid and rice proves this fake procedure never happened and both Fraud Bannister and Buster the clown are terrible liars.
#3. No forensic analysis was conducted on Jimi Hendrix
We all laugh at this nonsense cuz the whole point of an autopsy is to do analysis to determine how a person died. “Buster” pathetically lies saying no forensic analysis was done on Hendrix cuz that destroys his whole hoax since no wine was ever detected. He expects us to believe Dr. Teare just looked at a dead Hendrix and did nothing else. So, Buster makes the absurd statement that nothing was done for Hendrix so he can still push his debunked hoax. Dr. Teare was the best pathologist in the world and did a full forensic analysis of Jimi’s body and detected no imaginary wine in his lungs, stomach, or the outside of his body proving the fake after the fact 1992 phony wine claims are a hoax.
#4. Pills were placed near Hendrix as a covert intelligence “murder method”
Here’s another made up asinine claim by this hoaxer trying to add a sinister plot to his phony hoax. “Buster” expects us to believe that Jeffery had someone, most likely Monika Dannemann, placed pills near Hendrix so that he would take 9 of them making it possible for the “murderers” to rush in with bottles of wine to pour down his throat. This is not the phony story made up by Tappy Wright which is the only fake Jeffery murder claim and Buster can’t make up his own fake versions to push a hoax. We have another after the fact fake and phony made up scenario that never even happened and this troll uses it for his fake evidence. That’s why nobody takes this joker seriously.
#5. Jimi was a victim of homicide
This fake claim is pushed the wine troll “Buster” but it’s another easily debunked farce. Both ambulance men and the police who viewed the death scene saw nothing that would indicate foul play or a “homicide”. Each man who witnessed a dead Hendrix spoke with Kathy Etchingham and never once mentioned anything of a “murder” was suspected. If there was anything close that resembled foul play, the flat would have been sealed off as a crime scene. Each man confirmed it was a drug overdose and they took Hendrix away. This troll has no evidence cuz no wine was ever witnessed and that’s what he claims “murdered” Hendrix and no wine was found anywhere in the flat. Another fake claim easily debunked.
Hi Jason, All the official evidence points to no murder or sinister plot to get rid of Jimi. David Henderson wrote in his book that Monika has relationships with other musicians before Jimi, and Gerry Stickells said that Eric Barrett had met Monika before so she moved in music circles. Michael Jeffrey reached just the rank of Private in the army so I would think neither of these two would be recruited by some spy agency to do their work or would ever be considered.
Monika met Jimi in Düsseldorf, Germany in 1969 spending a couple of days with him, and then she met up with him again in September 1970 spending just a few days with him before he died in her apartment. It’s silly to suggest that she was getting together with Mike Jeffery to plot Jimi’s murder in the short amount she was actually in London. Tin foil hatters create parallel stories that co-exist with what really happened hoping that someone will be dumb enough to be taken in with what they say.
Hoaxers have no documented evidence to say “Here’s the wine”
Hoaxers have no documented evidence to say “Jeffery was intelligence”
Hoaxers have no evidence to say “Jimi was murdered”
All they have are phony claims, made up stories, hearsay, personal opinions, and innuendos which is not real evidence.
The medical staff knew exactly how to interpret what they were seeing with Jimi. They didn’t make any mistakes in their assessment. Taking medication that you know nothing about and prescribed for someone else is asking for trouble. There’s no getting around the fact that Jimi took a lethal dose of Monika’s Vesparax a bad decision that cost him his life.
Perfectly stated.
I’ve been reading about the number of people in the entertainment industry who were politically active and motivated in the sixties. Actress Jane Fonda earned the nickname Hanoi Jane after she travelled there and was openly critical of America’s involvement in the Viet Nam war. Joan Baez’ husband spent time in prison for refusing to be drafted. Jimi on the other hand wasn’t overtly political if he had something to say he expressed his thoughts through his music like the Star Spangled Banner, Machine Gun, I Don’t Live Today, Up From The Skies and Power Of Soul.
People in the 70’s were overdosing and dying from Vesparax and they were taking far less pills than Jimi did.
Hi Jason, I read that Vesparax has been withdrawn from the market in most countries. What you wrote says it all really.
Monika spent a good deal of time suing various authors and publishers who she thought portrayed her in a negative light. She threatened Noel Redding by saying he would lose his house and this is the reason Kathy got involved in the investigation into Jimi’s death. The investigation confirmed the Vesparax caused Jimi’s death what was revealed however was the delay in calling the ambulance by a number of hours. Dr Crompton reiterated Dr Teare’s findings in the autopsy report to Kathy. The high dosage Jimi took caused him to choke on his own vomit and destroyed his liver. He had no chance of survival.
Dr. Crompton confirmed the toxic level of Vesparax in Jimi Hendrix.
In the 70’s, people died from taking 3-4 pills and Jimi took 5-6 more pills than they did.
It was printed on the pamphlets that even a slight overdose of barbiturates can cause coma or death.
In 1976 a woman died from mistakenly taking 3 pills when she thought it was her
Vitamins.
This was powerful medication and trying to claim taking 9 of these won’t kill you is asinine.
The normal dose for Vesparax is half a tablet; this says a lot about how strong they actually are. As Noel suggested in his book Monika didn’t stop Jimi from taking 9 of these knowing full well what the safe dosage was. But perhaps she did mention something but Jimi took the risk anyway. Dr Thurston said at the inquest why Jimi took so many cannot be safely answered.
Well folks, here it is already, the end of another year. Also another year that Buster aka Brian Doyle, and the many pseudonyms he uses, continued to push his phony Jimi Hendrix murder Hoax for a tenth year. Well, he will have a very hard time trying to push this debunked conspiracy in 2020 for an eleventh year, since Ivana and myself have exposed it as the fraud sham that it is.
Just to show everybody what a troll and hoaxer “Buster” aka Brian Doyle is, we have another new pseudonym used by him on Amazon. He has been using this for a while, so I thought I would post some of the garbage he writes on Amazon.
Now, I’m not sure what this guy is trying to do. On this site, “Buster” profusely defends Sharon Lawrence to the ends of the Earth. But on Amazon, “Buster” was posting under his pseudonym “Ralph Yates” attacking Sharon Lawrence and giving her Jimi Hendrix fiction book a 1 star review. Either he is mentally off or just doing some crazy trolling on all these sites just to pass the time. Why would he defend her on this site and attack her on Amazon writing a book review? And if you think that’s nuts, he then uses his other pseudonym “Albert Doyle” to praise her book in the same review. Crazy head shaking stuff.
It’s all there in black and white folks. Just Google Sharon Lawrence “Jimi Hendrix: The Man, the Magic, the Truth” and read the 1 star and 5 star Amazon reviews. Crazy stuff folks. Here is a piece of what “Ralph Yates” wrote and there is no mistaking that the author of the review is “Buster” aka Brian Doyle who uses “Albert Doyle” for his fake user names.
Ralph Yates: This book is a disinformation work from a media insider who was close to Jimi Hendrix. It is even possible Sharon Lawrence was placed on Jimi Hendrix by US Intelligence as they were known to do. In it Lawrence makes the absurd suggestion that Jimi took 9 sleeping pills as a sort of magic russian roulette that would decide his fate by either killing him or not.
Ms Lawrence exploits this confession for her disinformation purpose by trying to blame Monika. Meanwhile more credible researchers like myself realize that Sharon was friends with some other rock heavyweights who were involved but totally refrains from applying the same criticism she applies towards Monika to them. Persons like Eric Burdon, Gerry Stickells, Eric Barrett, Terry Slater, Alan Douglas, and others. So Sharon is definitely trying to scapegoat Monika as a patsy in order place blame on a dead person who can’t defend themselves.
Sharon Lawrence is a notorious individual who violently attacks anyone who tries to confront her on what she wrote in this book about Jimi’s death. She’s arrogant and will not speak about it at the threat of legal action. And this coming from a person who is caustically critical, in this same book, of others not defending Jimi and betraying him. Even worse I think Sharon has a good idea that there’s a lot more to Jimi’s death than she revealed. What people have to realize, including Sharon, is that Jimi’s murder is the central truth to his reality and that it will affect those who cover his life accordingly. Sharon makes the terrible mistake of thinking her attacking people by means of her Hendrix credentials will overcome this. In the end, when the truth comes out, Sharon will be made to heel to it and it won’t be merciful to the real betrayers who are not whom they currently seem to be.
JASON says: Yes indeed, that was “Buster” aka Brian Doyle writing that 1 star review attacking Sharon Lawrence but he defends her on here. He is also defending Monika Dannemann in that review. Not sure what this troll is trying to prove, but his words and writing style proves this is him with more written below.
Ralph Yates: I’m an expert at this subject and have studied it deeply. The answer to your protest is that Jimi culminated his activities during that last week by firing Michael Jeffery sometime around 5pm on Sept 17th. 12 hours later Jimi was dead under mysterious circumstances where all the witnesses were lying. I don’t think it takes a Sherlock Holmes to figure out what happened.
BUSTER: I’m an expert on the murder of Jimi Hendrix.
BUSTER: Jimi fired Jeffery at around 5pm September 17. 11 hours later Jimi was dead. It doesn’t take a Sherlock Holmes to figure out why.
BUSTER: There was a methodology to that murder that precluded impulsive female reaction. The pills were planned. That kind of planning puts you squarely within the modus operandi of intel. You have to play Sherlock Holmes and look at the evidence.
JASON says: So, “Ralph Yates” and “Buster” both brag about being Jimi Hendrix experts and using Sherlock Holmes as a reference in his postings. Same writing style and words proves this is the same person
Now for an encore, we have Buster’s pseudonym “Albert Doyle” defending Sharon Lawrence in the same review. What is this guy up to?
Albert Doyle: The question of how Jimi got those Vesparax sleeping tablets into him is unanswered, however Jimi’s New York doctor said Jimi called him from the Samarkand to consult him on his insomnia and that Jimi said he had some “Tuinols” there at the flat. So it is possible Jimi took the super-powerful Vesparax thinking they were weaker Tuinols. If you read Monika’s ‘Inner World Of Jimi Hendrix’ she says Jimi said something about Devon OD’ing him but she didn’t pay attention. So maybe Jimi realized he was having an overdose without knowing it was the Vesparax he had just taken? Typical of Monika, she asks us to believe she heard Jimi say he thought he was OD’ed right before passing-out and she ignored it and did nothing. Trust me, all the lies Monika told were due to the fact she was aware Jeffery had waterboarded Jimi to death with wine. That’s the simple explanation no one can figure out.
Don’t make the mistake of thinking Monika accidentally poured 3 bottles of wine into Jimi while “misguidedly” trying to clear his throat. The reason that sounds ridiculously preposterous is because it is. I love it when people take Monika’s stories as true and then propose a grown woman somehow made the mistake of pouring 3 bottles of wine into Jimi. Don’t you get it yet? Jeffery waterboarded Jimi to death as he confessed. Monika knew it but couldn’t say anything without risking a similar fate herself, so she made-up that complete cockamamie story to cover herself. The reason Monika’s stories blew-up on her and eventually led to her being forced into court to explain them is because she knew Jeffery murdered Jimi.
JASON says: So, we can see that “Buster” is just a long time troll pushing a hoax and passing the time pretending to defend Sharon Lawrence and then attacking her with a fake user name. He also does the same with Monika Dannemann too.
Notice how this troll “Buster” aka Albert Doyle said “3 bottles of wine” on Amazon when on here he always claims 5 bottles of wine. So, we can easily see that these “bottles of wine” claims are just made up by this troll “Buster” himself. You can’t keep changing the number of bottles for a fake story over the years. “Buster” changes all his fake stories claiming it to be “real evidence” as he pretends to be a Jimi Hendrix expert.
And we also have this from our troll.
Albert Doyle: I’m an expert at Jimi Hendrix’s death.
JASON says: Who else says this besides “Buster”? And below we have the same claims and writing style from the same person using two fake names. “Buster” as Ralph Yates and Albert Doyle.
Ralph Yates: I’m an expert at this subject and have studied it deeply. The answer to your protest is that Jimi culminated his activities during that last week by firing Michael Jeffery sometime around 5pm on Sept 17th. 12 hours later Jimi was dead under mysterious circumstances where all the witnesses were lying. I don’t think it takes a Sherlock Holmes to figure out what happened.
Albert Doyle: I’m an expert at Jimi Hendrix’s death and this book has serious issues. Ron Russell claims that Jimi called him at his Head Start School where he was teaching in the early morning. The problem with that is it is generally accepted that Jimi died at 5:30am London time. In the summer that would be 1:30am Tampa time in the middle of the night well before school hours.
JASON says: Well folks, there is no denying that “Buster” aka Brian Doyle is the same poster who uses the fake pseudonyms posting as “Albert Doyle” and “Ralph Yates” both supporting and attacking Sharon Lawrence and Monika Dannemann at the same time being a devious troll.
We end this year off with a bang exposing this phony Hendrix Murder as the sham hoax that it is and exposing “Buster” aka Brian Doyle as a 10 year deviant fraudulent troll pushing a now debunked hoax.
Happy New Year!
Amazing stuff, Jason. I’ll be very surprised if Buster or whatever his name is shows up on this site again pushing his fairytales. Happy New Year Jason!
Happy New Year Ivana!
“Buster” aka Brian Doyle etc. is just a hoaxer who wasted a decade pushing a scam. All his fake user names and behavior proves it.
One moderator at another site said “Brian Doyle is like a bad rash that never goes away.”
So, we shall see.
All this fake waterboarding with wine scenario never existed before Wright’s book came out. Biographies written just after Jimi’s death never mentioned this as at all because it never happened. Chris Welsh interviewed all the major Hendrix personnel for his biography of the early 70’s and there was never any hint or suggestion of foul play involved in Jimi’s death. Dr Teare’s autopsy report also stated that there was no sign of violence along with Jimi’s actual cause of death.
Excellent points Ivana.
All the fake “wine” and “murder” claims are all decades later phony claims.
The reason these fraudsters never made these claims in 1970 right after Jimi died is cuz it never happened.
The phony “forced wine drowning” would have shown trauma to Jimi as well as the fake “Jeffery/Hendrix Murder” story Tappy “The Fraud” Wright made up for his crappy book. No signs of foul play or forced trauma that would indicate a “wine drowning” was ever detected by Dr. Teare during the autopsy.
And no evidence of these fake claims ever exist.
Fraud Bannister is not credible who was convicted on 3 counts of fraud losing his medical license.
Tappy Wright is an admitted liar who made up a fake claim for his crappy book.
Sharon Lawrence published many lies in her fiction book.
These 3 fraudsters are not credible for any of the phony Hendrix ciaims they make.
Hi Jason, If people what to know the real truth all they need to do is read the autopsy report; it’s all there in black and white. You can’t go past the experienced and trustworthy Dr. Teare, and then Dr. Crompton. We’ll never get the facts from these dumb books all designed to cash in on Jimi’s death.
Last night I was watching a film about the life of Edith Piaf how she was plagued by various illnesses and addictions throughout her life and eventually dying in her late forties from either cancer or cirrhosis of the liver. Judy Garland seemed to have had a similar life and death in terms of addictions and ailments. Dr. Teare performed the autopsy on Judy but none was performed on Edith. The entertainment industry should come with a warning:enter at your own risk or do not enter at all.
After Kathy’s investigation into Jimi’s death, Dee Mitchell who had helped out during the investigation apparently suffered some sort of breakdown accusing Kathy of some really bad things including fabricating evidence. Dee also wrote to Monika to say that they could not find anything to implicate her in Jimi’s death. Dee Mitchell wasn’t who she claimed to be using a fictitious name for some reason.
Well folks, we have yet another pseudonym used by “Buster” Brian Doyle on Amazon as he trolls the website trying to give himself fake credibility. You see, nobody recognizes him as the great “expert researcher” he claims he is, so he needs to create false alias accounts to give himself the credibility he craves. Yes, it’s pathetic, but it also shows him to be mentally deranged creating a hoax and using fake names to keep it going for a decade.
Last time I posted that “Buster” was using the pseudonym “Ralph Yates” on Amazon to attack his hero Sharon Lawrence and her fiction book on Amazon giving her book a 1 star review after he attacked me for calling out her lies on here as he profusely defended her on this site. Then “Buster” used another pseudonym “Albert Doyle” to praise her book and defend her in the same review. “Buster’s actions prove him to be the deranged troll we all know him to be, but he was caught using another alias to give himself fake credibility and praise since nobody else does it.
If you Google “Jimi Hendrix: The Man, the Magic, the Truth” by Sharon Lawrence and click on the Amazon link under the 1 star review, you will see a 1 star review by “Ralph Yates” which is “Buster” aka Brian Doyle posting under his fake name attacking Sharon Lawrence and her fiction book. If you go to the comments of “Ralph Yates” review, you will see a poster named “David”, who is also “Buster” aka Brian Doyle giving himself fake credibility and praise. The writing style and the way he talks about Hendrix is exactly the same. Check this out.
David: Ralph, As always, your eloquence, passion, and incredible depth of knowledge on this subject is nothing short of remarkable. If the world were fairer, and the pen of history more inclusive, you’d be remembered as one of the key champions of Jimi, not only as an artist but as a human being who deserves a proper defense from the dark forces that snuffed him out.
You are just about the only living person I can recall offhand who is truly dedicated to the cause of bringing light to Jimi’s murder and revealing the truth about his final night. It is downright bizarre how disinterested people are in this matter. The matter of Kurt Cobain’s murder/suicide (I remain undecided but can see both sides) is somehow a hype-worthy topic, garnering multiple acclaimed documentaries in the past couple years alone, and yet Jimi remains in most of the culture just a LSD-fueled, “weird” black guy who’s really great at guitar and who turned the US national anthem into a bunch of noise (nevermind that he smashed boundaries between “black” and “white” genres and cultures, rendering such distinctions unimportant, or thta his much-cited SSB rendition is nothing if not intensely political, more than mere sonic anarchy or a bit of funning around). Basically, the larger, political implications of Jimi’s life and music have been retrofitted, hidden, or denied from the new generations, neutering Jimi and turning the cultural image of him into a grotesque minstrel figure who plays guitar with his teeth for the enjoyment of “far-out,” solipsistic/clueless white people, the same “fans” who try to shut down any attempt at broaching honestly the subject of his suspicious death or even relationship with Michael Jeffery.
I understand that your review was more balanced than I perhaps implied. I appreciate that you have done your research (and then some), actually talking to people like Sharon or the Aleem brothers. Do I want to upgrade the rating of Sharon’s book and in turn her reputation? No, not really. Just wanted to perhaps emphasize that her book really is worth a read in the same way that Dannemann’s oddity is. Perhaps I have more resentment towards Dannemann because it seems that she betrayed Jimi at the most core level in likely allowing his murder to occur and then lying about it, if not actually collaborating in it in some way (I doubt she did, but lies and covering up of evidence is collusion enough, isn’t it?) Yes, Dannemann’s book is also a valuable resource because she did know Jimi fairly well — though not nearly as well as she seems to claim.
Your claims here are intriguing. Are you implying that both Lawrence and Dannemann could be intelligence infiltrators sent to ply Hendrix with false companionship/romance? Or just Lawrence? I know it makes sense for Sharon but most people I’ve read seem to paint Monika as more of a person in the wrong place at the wrong time, etc. who may have colluded but whose collusion may have haunted her until her suicide (murder?). I wouldn’t put it past either of them. Though, journalists like Cross and Weller strike me as especially appalling in their obvious anti-Jimi, pro-intelligence agenda — the way Cross’s book has become almost the official word on Jimi’s life is sickening. Henderson deserves that title, if we are to grant it to anyone. He alone chronicled Jimi’s entire life with truth, poetry, wisdom. He’s not afraid to speak truth to power; just a few years ago I saw him discussing Jimi’s murder in depth on a NY public-access show.
You really should write a book on all of this. I am deadly serious. Nobody else seems to want to. And, sadly, Tappy Wright has passed — what a tragedy, how few key people and good people associated with Jimi are now gone. It really seems strange just how few people who worked with or knew Jimi well are still alive, or even who lived into the new millennium. (Some of these deaths are of course suspicious, e.g. Devon, but I doubt any foul play with, say, Mitch or Buddy). It is a damn shame that Tony Brown died before he could go even further into the case, because once Dannemann died a lot of stuff was then alright to say. Brown’s book is a revelation, but it’s still stopping short of telling the entire picture. You really have a lot to offer on this subject and a book would give a lot of exposure to the subject that internet posts obviously just cannot. Just a thought. Time is running out, and in not too long this will be semi-“ancient” history, without the immediacy needed to generate more interest and a possible re-opening of the case.
JASON says: Same exact writing style like “Buster”. Talks about “dark forces” killing Hendrix, same reference to the National Anthem, same phony claims of “intelligence” being involved, Jimi being used as a “minstrel figure”,phony claims of “murder” and the rest of the same bogus claims and references that “Buster” posts all over the internet with his various alias names. Look at all the extra heavy super heaping of praise he gives to his fake account of “Ralph Yates”. Saying he should write a book, has remarkable knowledge, great researcher, champion of Jimi, and the rest of the nonsense he wrote. People don’t give that kind of praise to others unless it’s fake and this certainly is. There’s no doubt that “David” is “Buster” aka Brian Doyle posting this fake comment to his other fake alias “Ralph Yates”. This guy is mentally off or just really trolling all the websites with his hoax pushing a scam.
Here is another easy clue that proves that “David” is “Buster”.
Buster: I can argue at a courtroom level on the murder of Jimi Hendrix. I am deadly serious.
Scrum Drum: I can prove, at a courtroom level, evidence for homicide in the London Coroner’s Office autopsy data sheet forensics for Jimi Hendrix. I am deadly serious.
Albert Doyle: I can prove at a courtroom level that Jimi Hendrix was murdered. I am deadly serious.
David: You really should write a book on all of this. I am deadly serious. Nobody else seems to want to.
JASON says: “Buster” uses the term “deadly serious” in all his fake alias names he posts with all over the internet. His “David” pseudonym is just another one added to his list of phony names.
This is why “Buster” aka Brian Doyle is a troll who gets banned from every site on the internet for using fake names posting garbage for his fake “murder” hoax. There is no doubt that “David” is “Buster” aka Brian Doyle giving himself fake credibility and praise on that Amazon comment. Truly pathetic and laughable what this troll “Buster” has been doing for over a decade, now entering into his 11th year of hoaxing.
Wow, Jason. David, Ralph Yates, Albert Doyle, Brian Doyle, Buster, Flyswatter, Scrum Drum, Jetblast, and the list goes on. The master of deception is at it again. All I can say is buyer beware.
A lot of names to push his hoax all over the net. He used the “Flyswatter” alias to give himself fake credibility. He did a terrible job of doing that lol
I don’t understand why the deaths of Devon and Monika are always accompanied with the words mysterious and suspicious. Devon was a promiscuous heroin addicted groupie who died at the Chelsea Hotel, and Monika committed suicide by gassing herself in her car after losing a court case against Kathy Etchingham.
Hoaxers like Brian Doyle and tabloid journalists attach those words to their deaths so they can spin a sinister plot to claim they were “murdered by dark forces” to push a hoax and to sell books. Nothing strange about a heroin addict dying from a heroin overdose or a mentally unstable person committing suicide after being exposed as a complete liar and a fraud.
I was reading an old thread at the “Deep Politics Forum”, where Buster was posting under his pseudonym “Albert Doyle”. Buster was pushing his same garbage and using his same trolling debate style posting lies and attempting to suppress real evidence. Well, this one poster Michael Cross, finally had enough of his crap and told Buster aka Albert Doyle off. This poster summed up the hoaxer, liar, and fraud we all know “Buster” as.
Michael Cross: Perhaps this will get me banned, or a time out from this forum, but if so, that’s fine. You sir are a liar. I am not going to go back to cut and paste the series of accurate and well thought rebuttals to the horse shit you purvey, but they are in this thread and others for all to see. Your contention that you’ve been ignored, that your “science” is irrefutable is a lie. Your “points” have been completely countered with evidence. The fact that you either ignore them or don’t understand them changes nothing. Your “forensic” points are opinion, have no science behind them and are entirely worthless. David’s focal point example was not a canard. It was IN FACT science, and any objective observer would have paused to ponder the implications of how the appearance of three dimensional space can be altered in a two dimensional representation by the length of a lens. This is PROVEN SCIENCE. That you call it a canard exposes you for the charlatan you’ve always appeared to be.
Hi Jason, This is what we’re been saying all along. Nice to see that Michael Cross didn’t fall for Buster’s nonsense either, and is just as discerning as we are.
Hi Ivana,
Michael Cross posted a perfect description of Buster and his behavior, including Buster’s phony forensic claims and how he ignores any evidence that debunks the nonsense he peddles by still trying to claim his garbage is irrefutable.
Seems like our friend deliberately targets certain threads so he can spin a yarn. I’ve noticed he posts really long winded rants so he can monopolise them and try to discourage any of his opponents.
He does that cuz he is a long time troll.
Our “friend” also posts long winded rants cuz he has no information to provide and feels his flowery prose can pretend to make himself appear to sound knowledgeable.
Just to show what cheap smearing fools Ivana and Jason are, Cross later admitted I was correct on the matter he attacked me over…They were trying to say Lee Harvey Oswald was a shadowy figure on the Texas School Book Depository front steps during the Kennedy Assassination therefore exonerating him…I proved the person in question was Depository secretary Sarah Stanton and Cross later admitted I was correct…
The fact that you use so many pseudonyms does not make you credible in anyway. The reason I started posting on this thread was because what you had written didn’t sound realistic at all-it read like something made up. You were posting what you called evidence which in fact it wasn’t, it’s speculation, innuendo and misinformation. Jimi wasn’t murdered but died of a lethal dose of barbiturates something which you have continually denied in favour of your hoax waterboarding theory which has been discovered to be a fraudulent account by Levine and Wright. No one bought into this nonsense only you it seems.
Hey, it’s “Albert” Doyle!
Buster, why were you posting under the fake name “Albert” when your name is Brian? Also, why were you attacking your hero Sharon Lawrence on Amazon using the fake name “Ralph Yates” giving her fiction book a 1 star review when you profusely defend her on here? That’s like the ultimate troll job dude.
No “smearing” from me “Albert”. Michael Cross posted a perfect and accurate description about you and your trolling. You claim your bogus evidence is ignored and your phony claims are irrefutable. Your phony “forensics” are not science and is only your worthless opinion. You proved that with your bogus claim that “Jimi had a famous tolerance to drugs and he could never die from them”. Dr. Rufus Crompton confirmed that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed his liver. So, what Michael Cross wrote is perfectly accurate for the way you behave on Hendrix forums. That’s the reason I posted it when I read it.
Well, you never proved Jimi Hendrix was “murdered” cuz your hoax was debunked.
Cross later admitted I was correct on Facebook…Jason is just a sick troll who looks for any cheap opportunity to smear while he stays safely away from the accurate details…
In case anyone takes Jason seriously Dr Crompton never said anything of the sort and this demented piece of shit Jason is lying and hoping he’ll get the attention of a response…What Crompton did do however is correctly determine Jimi died no later than 5:30am which is part of the proof that he was murdered because the pills could not kill that quickly nor did Jimi have enough to overdose…
My forensic arguments are written in stone science…Jason is just a sick troll who is offering ridicule in response because he is the one who has no credibility here not me…Very simply Jimi did not have enough barbiturate in him to overdose as the manufacturer made clear when they said Lethal Dose was “9 to 10 tablets”…A person with Jimi’s famous tolerance could not overdose on 9 tablets nor could they do so in only 1 to 2 hours, as was documented by the true timeline and Dr Crompton…Counter to what this lying asshole Jason is trolling, the science is strict and determinable and Jimi only had 1800mg of barbiturate in him…A person with Jimi’s tolerance would need about 3000mg or more to overdose…Jason has already been told Monika hired some doctors to look at Jimi’s death and they came to the same conclusion…Jason trolls this instead of intelligently obeying it…
Jason is just a trash-talking troll who hopes he’ll get the attention of a response and should be ignored…
Michael Cross agreed he was wrong and that “Prayer Man” in the NBC Newsreel film of the Texas Book Depository front steps was Depository employee Sarah Stanton and wasn’t Oswald…But that doesn’t stop our resident troll Jason because facts don’t get in the way of his demented infantile trolling…
The 1800mg of barbiturate found in Jimi could not “destroy his liver” as our lying troll Jason suggested…The autopsy doctors were brought in on the cover-up by the British government by the time Crompton made that quote…They needed Crompton to reverse because his correct 5:30am determination gave the forensic game away…
The royal prince has now stepped away from that Hendrix-killing monarchy in shame…
You disappoint me “Albert”. You skipped right over my questions and went straight to your hilarious “cover up claim”. I was holding out a glimmer of hope that you would answer them. Seems like you wanted to eagerly start your 11th year of hoaxing already. Is that the case “Albert”?
Why were you posting as “Albert” Doyle when your name is Brian Doyle? Why would you post under the alias “Ralph Yates” on Amazon attacking the book of your hero Sharon Lawrence giving her book a 1 star review, while you profusely defend her on this site? That’s called trolling dude. I’m beginning to think you might have multiple personalities with all the fake names you use and the different behavior you attach to those names.
The accurate details are in the post written by Cross. You post garbage based on your own fantasy opinion and try to claim it’s “science” and “forensics” which it is not. You just did that in your post above. So, like I said, what Cross posted about you is absolutely correct and fits your description right down to a T.
“Albert” invents his own fake “forensics” and claims it’s “science written in stone” just like Michael Cross said in the Deep Politics Forum. “Albert’s” “forensics” is complete nonsense that was easily debunked by Dr. Rufus Crompton. Pathetically, our hoaxing troll “Albert” has to discredit renowned famous doctors Dr. Teare and Dr. Thurston of being in on a “cover up” when their evidence debunks his hoax. “Albert” has no evidence for anything he claims it is only made up fantasy in his deranged head of fiction.
“Albert” can’t even tell the truth about the time Jimi died. “Albert” lies claiming it is 5:30 am. Tony Brown wrote in his book “Jimi Hendrix: The Final Days”, that “Crompton concluded that Hendrix died no later than 4 a.m.”
As for your asinine claim of how much drugs Jimi needed to take before he could die is an absolute joke. You are no medical expert or a doctor. You have no idea of the effects of drugs on the human body. No doctor in the world would make the bullshit claims you make. That’s why you are a clown and provide pure comedy for everyone to read.
Dr. Rufus Crompton who is a medical expert, directly told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed his liver and he wouldn’t have survived the drug overdose. This is written in stone and you’ve been easily debunked. Sadly, the only “evidence” you can put forth for your hoax is to claim a phony “cover up” and make up your bogus “forensics” that is laugh out loud hilarious.
From the book “Through Gypsy Eyes” by Kathy Etchingham:
“Donald Teare, the man who had actually done the autopsy on Jimi, was dead so we needed to talk to another expert. Dr Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School had worked with Professor Teare. We gave him a copy of the autopsy report and asked how, in his opinion, jimi had died.
‘He would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway,’ he told us. ‘The fact that he vomited and inhaled the vomit just hastened it. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it.”
Strange how Jimi’s so called “tolerance” to the Vesparax destroyed his liver with no chance of survival, and caused him to choke on his own vomit killing him. Half a tablet is the recommended dose for the drug Jimi took, if Jimi had that famous tolerance you push constantly Buster then he wouldn’t have passed out fully clothed on top of the bed covered in vomit. Jimi was clearly dying from the effects of the drug he took.
Ivana,
It’s a good thing “Albert” aka Buster didn’t enter into the medical profession or else he would be prescribing massive overdoses to all his patients based on his phony “forensics”.
Everything “Albert” is posting is complete garbage that he invented for his hoax. Real science and forensics easily debunked his nonsense which is why he has to claim “Jimi had a famous tolerance to drugs and couldn’t die from them” as he makes up his own fake numbers and claims famous top notch renowned doctors were in on a “cover up”.
“Albert” is a weak troll and can’t even come up with anything better for his dead hoax. He gave us our first laugh here in 2020 with his nonsense.
Great post you wrote and William Saunders confirms it in his book “Hendrix: London”
From the book “Hendrix London” by William Saunders:
“The pathologist, Professor Donald Teare, gave the cause of Jimi’s death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate poisoning. This meant that Jimi did not die because he vomited in his sleep, but vomited because he was already dying. It is a subtlety that is easy to miss.” Hendrix London p. 138 William Saunders
Hi Jason, Maybe we should call our friend Dr. Albert Buster. LOL. Kathy investigated Jimi’s death 26 years after the event and the prognosis remained the same. The Vesparax clearly killed Jimi. How anyone would take Buster’s words seriously over that of the forensics team is pretty dumb. Saying that someone like Jimi who had a very slim build and a height of 5ft 11inches could tolerant such a high dosage is stupid to say the least. I never take anything Buster writes seriously; he’s good for a laugh.
How about Albert Buster Yates? That way he can have 3 of his famous pseudonyms all at once. LOL.
He has no idea about barbiturate tolerance and just makes up nonsense. Anybody can make a denial like he does and claim drugs can’t kill you. It’s a total joke.
Monika failed to mention the argument she had with Jimi outside Harvey’s place after Jimi started showing interest in another girl there. They supposedly left this party at around 11pm, and then Jimi went onto the Kameron party alone. According to Angie Burdon Jimi seemed jumpy when he arrived and became increasingly annoyed when Monika buzzed the intercom repeatedly to pick him up. Guests started shouting at Monika to go away and leave Jimi alone. Interestingly Jimi got into the lift and left the party and went back to the Samarkand with her taking Monika’s Vesparax and dying around 3-4am. There were no murderers lying in wait for Jimi as this scenario depends on Jimi actually going back to the Samarkand; he did of course but there was no guarantee that he would. He made the fatal error of taking someone else’s prescription medication at a lethal dose not knowing anything about this brand of barbiturates.
Buster posting as “Albert” Doyle uses the same phony claims and weak argument tactics at the Deep Politics Forum just like he does here.
Albert Doyle: You are ignoring the best arguments on the internet on this subject. They’re credible and can’t be ignored by anyone who considers themselves a credible analyzer of the subject.
Michael Cross: Is English your second language? You don’t seem to understand the meaning of what you write. You’re seriously asserting that the long series of responses to your disinformation is ignoring you?
Jason is trying to switch the subject in his trolling responses…The 1800mg I cited is the hard fact, written in stone, going standard here and Jason has posted nothing to prove otherwise…Jason has failed to answer the basic fact that the Vesparax manufacturer listed “9 to 10 tablets” because they knew the 1800mg of barbiturate in 9 Vesparax was not enough to kill…Jason has failed to answer the basic argument that it takes 2000mg to overdose in a person with no tolerance…Jimi’s tolerance was well-known and often spoken of by his friends…Jason is too dumb and too full of trolling fever to realize my argument is proven by the fact the manufacturer bracketed that 2000mg threshold in their Lethal Dose data when they listed “9 or 10 tablets”…That proves the science right there (which is commonly available elsewhere and Jason never counters with any facts)…And it is also why Monika’s doctors told her the pills would not have killed Jimi…
Jason is a nut who trolls me for using an alias but then ignores the fact he uses an alias in this thread…That is the kind of nutty hypocrisy you get with sick trolls who are impervious to facts…We need to learn Jason’s identity and hold him accountable for his trolling of Jimi’s murder…
Again – while quoting Michael Cross Jason ignores that Cross put his foot in his mouth big time and admitted I was correct on the Prayer Man issue Cross was ridiculing me over…Only Cross didn’t have the courage to admit it on that forum where the coward moderator Lauren Johnson banned me instead of following his own site rules and admitting he was wrong…
The time Crompton said was 5:30…And it was reinforced by the fact that was when Monika first started calling out…
The subject is over “Albert”. Jimi died from a lethal barbiturate overdose and the autopsy proved it. Your phony claims have no merit.
Crompton confirmed that to Kathy when she handed him Jimi’s autopsy report. Your bogus claim was exposed as a fraud and has been shut down.
Your old rehashed argument is crap and is laughable. Believing anything Monika Dannemann says already disqualifies you from being a serious participant in this arena.
No pharmaceutical manufacturer is going to list that taking 9-10 pills isn’t dangerous and can’t kill you cuz they would get sued if someone took less of their pills and died. The max dosage was 1 pill. They are not going to print 9-10 pills is a safe dosage when Jimi died on a lethal dosage of 9.
People in the 70’s were dying from taking an overdose of 4-5 pills which is why this product was removed.
Pharmaceutical companies said opioids weren’t addictive and couldn’t kill you. Now they are being sued cuz they lied. Are they going to claim taking 9-10 of those can’t kill you? Your argument is a joke and isn’t worthy of being considered a serious discussion.
Jimi never had a famous tolerance to Vesparax he had a tolerance to Mandrax. Those are two different pills and Vesparax is more powerful, plus he mixed alcohol with an amphetamine. Your “tolerance” claim false flat on your face cuz having a “tolerance” to drugs does not prevent a person from overdosing. Jimi overdosed before on far less powerful pills and less than 9. So your phony argument is a total joke.
The forensic analysis of Jimi’s body proved he died of a drug overdose. That evidence will always refute your hoaxing claims.
The only troll here is “Buster” who has over a half dozen known alias names that he uses to troll websites with and talks with himself in comment sections perpetrating a known hoax. He gets banned from every site he posts on. I don’t post with alias names and you are lying. There was no “murder” and that was proven.
There were several other members on that thread calling you out on your nonsense that I’ve read. You were taken apart on that thread and your claims were proven false.
Tony Brown confirmed from Dr. Crompton that Jimi Hendrix died no later than 4 am. Are you calling Tony Brown a liar “Albert”?
You said it Jason the subject is over, it’s done and dusted and Buster needs to get over it and move on.
Strange how Monika’s doctors told her never to take more than half a tablet, and then doing a complete turn around and saying that the pills didn’t kill Jimi. This is just ridiculous, and the manufacturers of Vesparax would never admit that 9 to 10 tablets is a safe dose to take and would not be considered an overdose. The pills caused severe liver damage in Jimi, and caused the inhalation of vomit due to the effects of the drugs he took. Take the Vesparax out of this equation and there is no death scene.
Jimi already died from a drug overdose on 9/18/70 and Dr. Albert Buster Yates wants to claim drug manufacturers and Monika’s doctors said years later Jimi couldn’t have died from the pills when he already died years before from the pills. That has to be the worst attempt at a rebuttal that I’ve ever seen. That’s like someone trying to claim the Titanic really didn’t go down cuz there needs to be a certain number of people to meet the “threshold” before it can sink. Dr. Albert Buster Yates has hit rock bottom with his bogus claims making up fake numbers starting off in 2020. He should retire, his 10 year run has exceeded it’s limit. He’s used up every fake claim for his hoax and these hilarious after the fact claims just show his desperation.
Hi Jason, I can’t believe what I’ve just read from the bogus Dr. Albert Buster Yates. How many prescription medications come with the label take strictly as directed. If Monika’s doctors told her to take no more than half to one tablet then it’s fair to say that even two tablets would be considered an overdose in this case. Jimi took nine all at once going excessively beyond the safe and recommended dosage for Vesparax. In some other medications 200-300mgs is considered a high dose. Even a pain killer like 500mgs of Panadol adults should take only 1-2 tablets every 4-6 hours but never more than 8 over 24 hours. It’s irresponsible, dangerous and downright naive to suggest that the lethal dose Jimi took didn’t cause his death. The high dosage Jimi took destroyed his liver and caused him to vomit and choke. There was nothing else at the scene that morning to suggest that Jimi died of anything other than the Vesparax. Dr Teare’s thorough autopsy confirmed just that, as did Dr. Crompton. Monika stuck to the recommended dose but unfortunately Jimi didn’t. I think where Monika failed Jimi was not disclosing just how lethal this particular drug was going beyond the recommended dosage.
Hi Ivana,
I’m having a good laugh reading the nonsense from Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates who claims he is posting “science” when it’s just bogus after the fact claims he read in a book that he says is his “forensic science”. Anyone moron who claims it’s ok to take 9-10 pills and you still can’t die cuz you didn’t meet the imaginary “threshold” is not to be taken seriously. He has made many absurd claims but this takes the cake.
Even the manufacturers of Tylenol wouldn’t give the green light to take 9 Tylenol pills at one crack but the Dr. Albert Buster Yates says it’s ok to take 9 super powerful Vesparax barbiturates.
When a person takes over the prescribed amount that is called an overdose and our hoaxer Dr. Albert Buster Yates claims it is not. Printed on Vesparax packaging in the 70’s said a “slight overdose can cause coma or death”. And Albert Buster Yates says it’s ok to take 9 cuz the “threshold” hasn’t been met. Then he’s desperately trying to come up with mg numbers to claim this is how much Jimi could tolerate so it goes over 9 pills total so he can still push his debunked hoax. He has no freaking idea how much Jimi or any person can tolerate. Jimi could not tolerate the 9 Vesparax pills cuz he died from them. This clown is hilarious and it’s pathetic how far he goes to push this hoax.
What the incompetent doctor didn’t learn in fantasy medical school is that even if a person survives an overdose, the toxic level of barbiturates in the person’s system still can still cause death from damaged organs. That’s what was happening to Jimi and why he was vomiting so much. Also the fact the pills knocked him out and he was on his back he couldn’t turn over when he was vomiting which suffocated him. But as Dr. Crompton confirmed, Jimi’s liver was destroyed from the toxic level of barbiturates in his system and he would have died anyway. Our hoaxing troll Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates lied and said that Dr Crompton never confirmed that when it’s printed and documented in Kathy’s book and on Jimi’s autopsy report.
Monika was haunted her whole life by the fact it was her pills that killed Jimi. She was on the record contradicting herself saying the “pills were weak” and then “they were too strong”. She even stated she didn’t want Jimi to take the pills and only a half pill was the proper dosage. Then it was one pill and anymore would be an overdose. So, then the claim that her doctors and the Vesparax manufacturers would say taking 9-10 pills were ok and you couldn’t die from them is total b.s when she said 1 pill max and people were overdosing and dying on 4-5 pills in the 70’s.
Monika spent the rest of her life trying to get rid the stigma of her being at fault for Jimi’s death by changing her stories by making up bogus claims like this one. What’s hilarious is that Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates spent years writing posts attacking both Dannemann and Caesar Gleebbek calling them frauds, liars, and not credible people and here he is using their bogus claims for his dead hoax.
When Jason gets beaten by the facts he resorts to his crazy trolling…For example knowing he can’t answer the science I posted he deliberately comes in and posts that I wrote the manufacturer was saying it was OK to take 9 to 10 tablets…Jason knows I didn’t say that but being a sick puppy he knows it will distract from his being unable to credibly answer the science I posted and he can divert from it and hope I chase that particular rabbit down his trolling rabbit hole…
It was more than clearly posted already that the 9 to 10 tablet Lethal Dose threshold came from the manufacturer’s product information that was published by Caesar Glebbeek in his ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication…And that it was a legal requirement in order to sell the drug…Jason knows that the Vesparax manufacturer never posted that 9 or 10 pills was OK to take…Just the opposite, the manufacturer was following legal requirements and publicly posting how much would kill you so the public was legally informed of the danger of the drug as required…The reason why Jason is playing this demented troll’s game of putting words in people’s mouths they never said and creating dishonest strawmen is because he knows he can’t answer the fact that the manufacturer knew barbiturate science and knew that 9 tablets only contained 1800mg of Secobarbital…It is fact-checkable provable science that it takes 2000mg of Secobarbital to make a person with no tolerance overdose, so when the manufacturer listed that 10th tablet they were proving that science by matching that 2000mgs…Jason can’t answer the fact that with a famous tolerance Jimi could not overdose on only the 1800mg of 9 tablets so he trolls sloppy crap instead hoping to mire the thread in it and draw the readers’ attention from the fact he’s been beaten by the science he can’t answer in public and trolls in response to instead…
I’ve never seen any case of anyone dying from 4 to 5 Vesparax, so I assume this is more trolling dementia from the unbanned troll Jason…
Jason is an idiot and the people who determined 2000mg was the Lethal Dose threshold for Secobarbital were independent laboratories and were not the manufacturers…Jason is stupid if he doesn’t realize he’s exposing his trolling ignorance there…
To prove Jason is an idiot Mandrax has the same Secobarbital base barbiturate as Vesparax…
Jason posts the idiotic claim that tolerance does not stop a person from overdosing…Any look at basic barbiturate science shows that tolerance is well known in drug science to cause the victim to need much more of the same drug to overdose…In the worst cases it can take up to 10,000mg to reach Lethal Dose for Secobarbital…Jason is entering this dementia because he’s trolling and trying to muck up the thread with crazy BS hoping I’ll wear myself out answering it…
Jimi was never found with lungs and stomach full of 5 bottles of wine with a dangerous manager he just fired in those other cases…Jason, of course, while pretending to be a strict judge of information gives Monika a complete pass as far as what she was doing this whole time…Jason uses the dishonest method of dismissing everything about Monika because of her lack of credibility…But the only reason he’s doing that is to avoid answering what we do know because it points directly towards murder…
Jason is trolling hard but it is more than clear he hasn’t gotten over the hump of Crompton giving the game away by telling Kathy Etchingham Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid when he arrived at Hospital…So the wine was relayed to the Coroner’s Office and they criminally failed to input it in to the forensics that phony, pretending-to-be-a-strict-demander-of-protocol Jason has no worry over as he tries to brazenly deny obvious murder evidence in public with idiotic trolling…Crompton’s knowledge of the wine was pure evidence of a cover-up at the government/Corner’s Office level…
This is just a simple “flood trolling” method by a sick pup hoping he’ll drive the credible posters away with volume…
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is not posting anything serious or factual in relation to science. His “science” consists of asinine and bogus medical claims that is not to be taken seriously and is not worthy of a serious discussion.
Dr. Albert/Brian Doyle’s “science” says people including Jimi Hendrix, can gobble down handfuls of power barbiturate pills and that nothing will happen to them. This is what he is telling us and then he lies about it claiming he never said it when we all can read it. “Albert” says it’s ok to take 9-10 Vesparax pills cuz it doesn’t meet the imaginary “threshold” in order for them to die from an overdose.
This is the most asinine claim in the world. Blatant hoaxing like this disqualifies Albert/Brian Doyle from even being a real participant in the Jimi Hendrix Community.
After that, Albert Buster Yates desperately comes up with fake mg numbers trying to go over the 9 pill mark so he can still claim Jimi had a “tolerance to the pills”. He needs to claim Jimi hasn’t met his “threshold” yet so he didn’t die from the pills. He claims this crap is “science” as he ignores real science which is the forensic autopsy that proves Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed his liver. Shows you just how far this hoaxer will go to push this dead ridiculous hoax trolling like a clown.
What is most hilarious of all, is that Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates uses claim from a man that he truly hates, named Ceasar Glebbeek, and tries to take credit for Caesar’s bogus claim as his own phony “forensics”. Albert Buster Yates spent years attacking this man all over the internet profusely stating he is a “Judas”, a “fraud” and the least credible Hendrix researcher on the planet. Albert Buster Yates said “Ceasar’s publication isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on” and if “anybody quotes or credits Ceasar Glebbeek then that person is not credible or to be taken seriously”. Well, here’s Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates quoting and crediting Ceasar Glebbeek. Absolutely hilarious. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is not credible or to be taken seriously according to his own words since he now embraces the claims of one Ceasar Glebbeek.
We can clearly see that this hoaxer Dr Albert Buster Yates is using other people’s phony “forensic” claims and is trying to take credit as his own. That’s what you call being a fraud. It’s the same bogus “Jimi had a famous tolerance to drugs” and “he could take 9-10 pills with no problem” and the “Vesparax manufacturers said it was ok cuz it didn’t meet the imaginary threshold”. All total bullshit after the fact claims. The top medical experts in the world confirmed in 1970 that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed his liver.
Folks, these 9-10 pill threshold claims is absolutely bogus and is not to be taken seriously. No doctor or pharmaceutical manufacturer is going to tell anybody that taking 9-10 of the most powerful barbiturates pills on the market can’t kill you if a person takes that amount. No human can take that amount of pills and still survive it. Jimi Hendrix clearly didn’t survive cuz he died from taking 9 pills and not 10. This is not “science” like this troll claims, this is insanity.
The autopsy report of Jimi Hendrix proved he suffocated on his own vomit from the drug overdose. The amount of barbiturates in Jimi’s system was lethal and destroyed his liver. This is confirmed and documented in Jimi’s autopsy as well as Kathy Etchingham’s book. No amount of denying, hoaxing, trolling, fake claims by Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is ever going to change this factual and scientific medical data that will forever refute him.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates keeps lying claiming Dr Rufus Crompton said Jimi died at 5:30 am when Tony Brown published in his book that Jimi Hendrix died no later than 4 am which was confirmed by Dr. Rufus Crompton.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates avoided my question refusing to answer it pretending not to see it. I shall ask the Doctor of Hoaxing once again.
Tony Brown in his book confirmed from Dr. Crompton that Jimi Hendrix died no later than 4 am. Are you calling Tony Brown a liar “Albert”?
Hi Jason, I really like what you wrote about Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates not being a real participant in the Jimi Hendrix Community with his nutty claims and hoaxing. I think our friend has lost track of what he’s said over the years and his “evidence” is becoming more and more outrageous by the minute.
Hi Ivana,
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is not a real participant in the Jimi Hendrix Community with the garbage he posts. He is making up absurd claims calling it “science” while he ignores the real forensic science. Not only that, he is making up fake mg numbers to exceed 9 pills so he can claim Jimi didn’t meet the imaginary “threshold” and didn’t overdose on the 9th and only a 10th pill would be lethal. That’s his “science”. That’s total nonsense and not even worthy of a serious discussion.
No doubt he has lost track of what he said cuz he makes up new bogus claims and contradicts the old ones. He is so desperate now that he has to quote his arch nemesis Ceasar Glebbeek’s claims and use it for his own “evidence”. No doctor or pharmaceutical manufacturer is going to tell anybody that taking 9-10 of the most powerful barbiturates won’t hurt you cuz it hasn’t met a “threshold”. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates must sit around all day thinking up this crap he can use for his dead hoax. It’s an absolute joke and he should be embarrassed to even put his name to such a bogus claim.
Each Vesparax tablet contains hydroxyethyl hydroxyzine dimoleate 39mgs, quinalbarbitone sodium 150mgs, and brallobarbitone calcium 50mgs. The recommended dose is half a tablet half an hour before going to bed. Lets just be very clear about things Buster, and the idiotic things being pushed here by you.
Associated Press
September 30, 1970
“During the autopsy of guitarist and musician Jimi Hendrix, hydroxyzines were found in his stomach, and barbiturates and amphetamines were found in his blood.”
“Drug overdoses severely impaired his musical ability; at a show in 1970, for example, he had to step down from the stage after only three songs due to a sedative overdose.”
Hi Jason, I haven’t read this before. There’s a very good reason why pharmaceutical companies print and place pamphlets in prescription medication or on the back of packets so that people are fully aware of the possible side affects and the dangers of not following the recommendations of the manufacturer or the advice of the doctor. Health professionals always warn about taking medications prescribed for someone else. In Jimi’s case he swallowed a lethal amount of Monika’s prescription meds which caused liver damage and were toxic to his system in other ways causing death.
Back in the day, there was quite a bit of information on Jimi’s death and the autopsy after that was published in the press. All the information and data showed it to be a drug overdose and that’s why all these bogus post 1992 claims is just a hoax that has no merit.
Exactly, that’s the reason they do that and they aren’t going to tell a person you can still take 8 more pills and you’ll be fine. That is totally absurd. Not only that, a person can have a severe reaction by taking the prescribed amount. So, this business of a blanket statement of people being able to still take 8 pills and you can’t die from it is asinine.
Jimi never took Vesparax before which is a more powerful drug than what he was used to. Also, Jimi overdosed on Mandrax which is a less powerful drug and he didn’t even take 9 of those. He also overdosed on just sedatives and couldn’t perform on stage. That proves that Jimi didn’t have a “famous tolerance” to drugs cuz he couldn’t handle the weaker drugs and less of them. Then Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is claiming he could take 9 Vesparax with no problem and he couldn’t die from it. What a joke.
This baseless and useless “famous tolerance to drugs” claim for Jimi Hendrix does not hold up. Making an absolute statement saying Jimi needed to take X amount of drugs before he could die is absurd. That’s exactly what the hoaxer Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is telling us with his made up nonsense. He is doing this so he can still push his hoax to make his bogus claims. Then he makes up fake mg numbers at the top of his head making his bogus claim even more absurd. There is no “science” behind his nonsense nor is anything he is saying even remotely legitimate.
Where Albert Doyle Buster Yates easily fails is that there are different factors to why you can’t make an absurd claim as this. One being were there other drugs involved to interact with the barbiturates? Was there alcohol involved? We know that Jimi took a powerful amphetamine at Kameron’s party called a black bomber. This amphetamine was recorded in Jimi’s autopsy report. We also know that Jimi drank wine at Harvey’s flat, Kameron’s party, and shared wine with Monika Dannemann. So, we have the mixing of uppers and several high powerful downers with glasses of wine with Jimi being slightly over the legal limit which was all forensically forensically analyzed. Mixing these different drugs together is lethal plus alcohol intensifies the already powerful pills. There is a reason they say not to mix drugs with booze and Jimi suffered a lethal drug overdose.
Jimi already overdosed on Mandrax before which is not as powerful as Vesparax. Jimi didn’t even take 9 pills of Mandrax when he overdosed. Jimi also overdosed on sedatives and couldn’t perform on stage due to the effect of the drug. So, it’s clearly obvious that Jimi didn’t have this “famous tolerance to drugs” after all since he couldn’t handle the Mandrax or the sedatives which were not even 9 pills. Then this hoaxer is trying to claim that 9 Vesparax pills couldn’t kill Jimi? It’s an absurd claim in order to push his bogus hoax.
There is no doubt that Jimi used a lot of drugs and was able to take more than others, but Jimi was not a drug “Superman” who could ingest massive amounts and not suffer any fatal consequences. So, this excuse of a “famous tolerance to drugs” does not hold up cuz Jimi died of a lethal drug overdose. Jimi had a few close calls with less amounts of drugs and taking more powerful drugs turned out to be fatal. So, this is another debunked phony made up claim by this hoaxer Albert Doyle Buster Yates who uses fake claims for his so called “science”.
Mixing drugs with alcohol is asking for trouble; I think fans always what to think that the people they admire are super human is some way and not like the rest of us. Maybe that’s why some people buy into conspiracy theories because they can’t stomach what really happened to their heroes like Jimi who choked to death on his own vomit. Monika tried to portray Jimi as a spiritual messenger and a prophet of some sort through her book The Inner World of Jimi Hendrix. She set herself up as the guardian and conveyer of this spiritual truth. Billy Cox said in an interview that Jimi talked about the Supreme Being a lot, and how the Church twisted and misinterpreted the best things that Jesus said. Jimi thought music had healing properties and was an excellent and positive way to bring people together-the Electric Church concept. Kathy on the other hand saw this as rewriting history saying that Jimi was a really nice bloke but not a prophet in any way. Like you said Jason, Jimi was not a drug Superman he was just a mere mortal who foolishly took too many of someone else’s prescription meds and paid the ultimate price.
Buster” was posting under his pseudonym “Albert Doyle” at the Deep Politics Forum for the beginning of his “Caesar Glebbeek Eviceration Campaign” that has been going on now for almost a decade. “Albert Doyle” has not shied away from attacking Mr. Glebbeek branding him as not being a credible source and a “Judas”. But what do we say about a person like “Albert Doyle” who spent almost a decade attacking this man as not being credible and then uses this man’s claims for his own bogus “evidence”? “Albert Doyle” has no shame and will use any means necessary to peddle his phony and debunked “Hendrix Murder Hoax” even if it’s bogus claims coming from his arch nemesis Ceasar Glebbeek. That’s just how desperate “Albert Doyle” is. He doesn’t care who he uses or how bad the information sounds, just as long as it fits with his fake narrative. What can be said about “Albert Doyle” is that he is nothing but a liar, hypocrite, and a fraud peddling a bogus hoax with any fake claims he can type out from his keyboard. What we have below is a hypocrite and a troll in action.
Albert Doyle: For those of you who don’t know, Caesar Glebbeek, a major European Hendrix archivist and source, and owner of Hendrix-based UniVibes Magazine, has put out a publication claiming to have “debunked the murder nonsense once and for all”. The magazine-like publication entitled ‘Until We Meet Again’ was released this September and claims to be a thorough inside investigation of the murder claims, with the intention of disproving the claim that Jimi was murdered. Never in my life have I ever seen such a pitiful and wickedly-dishonest attempt at spinning facts and distorting evidence. For this to have come from someone who claims to be a major Hendrix source and relator of accurate Hendrix history to the public is an outrage and qualifies at the Judas level for wicked betrayal. What Caesar has done here is unbelievably indescribable. He’s gone and twisted facts and distorted context, as well as deliberately omitting key qualifying information. His overlying premise is trying to justify Monika Dannemann and her original story given to the British Inquest. This story is well-known amongst all credible sources to be a complete fabrication and cover-up of the true facts, yet Caesar Glebbeek has the unbelievable nerve to dare defend this account and promote it as true thus proving the falseness of the murder claims. I can’t conceive of a more evil betrayal, short of the biblical level, for someone who pretends to be a Hendrix source. This is notorious and deserves to be exposed. May Caesar Glebbeek be shown as the scoundrel he is and betrayer of the subject of his ambitions.
JASON says: So, “Albert Doyle” says Ceasar is a scoundrel, distorts evidence, and spins facts who is “wickedly dishonest”. That’s a perfect description of “Buster” aka Albert Doyle, isn’t it? How can “Albert” now use the claims of Ceasar Glebbeek on this site when he has attacked this man for almost a decade as being dishonest? “Albert Doyle”, you are a total hypocrite and a fraud.
The most hilarious line from Buster aka “Albert Doyle” in this passage is this: “Never in my life have I ever seen such a pitiful and wickedly-dishonest attempt at spinning facts and distorting evidence.”
Well, we see this from Buster aka “Albert Doyle” each time he posts garbage for his hoax. “Albert Doyle” posts nothing but lies and bogus claims as he distorts the real documented evidence against him. Doyle was using a lot of projection in that comment.
Albert Doyle: However there’s something much more sinister going on in Caesar’s opening pages. What he’s really trying to do is document the breakdown of Jimi and his professional performance during those last few weeks. What Caesar is trying to do is paint a picture, like a prosecutor, of Jimi’s breakdown and reckless drug use during his final days. And he’s doing it in defense of Monika Dannemann and her notorious lies. Caesar accesses his archives of media interviews and personal accounts to fill in this depreciating chronology of sinister intent.
JASON says: As every provocateur does, they have to paint an imaginary evil or sinister plot to push their scam and “Albert Doyle” wastes no time choosing careful words to accomplish that goal. “Albert” narrates his story pretending to give “expert analysis” on the matter but he is just a troll pushing his bogus scam.
Notice that “Albert” calls out Monika Dannemann for her “notorious lies”, but “Albert” has no problem using Monika’s “notorious lies” for the main phony claims for his hoax. When it comes down to the major phony claims for Buster’s aka Albert Doyle’s hoax, it’s Monika Dannemann’s lies that he always defends and uses. So, Albert uses a notorious liar Monika Dannemann for his bogus claims which is why he is a total fraud pushing a hoax based on lies. Albert uses Monika cuz her lies sounds good for his hoax and that’s all he cares about. Albert doesn’t care who he uses or how bad it sounds as long as it fits his phony hoaxing claims. Disinformation is the name of the game for this fraud.
There was nothing sinister about documenting Jimi’s escalating drug use during the last few weeks of his life. Everybody who knew Jimi said his drug use was increasing and was becoming reckless overdosing on drugs. Ted Nugent warned him to stop using drugs and even Tappy “The Fraud” Wright said Jimi was going out of control on drugs. So, this false accusation from “Albert Doyle” is an attempt to attack Glebbeek for publishing the truth cuz “Albert Doyle” the disinformation provocateur doesn’t want the fact that Jimi was increasing his drug use to be known cuz it destroys his fake hoax he pushes. Since Jimi was using more drugs and wasn’t being careful, it shows that Jimi was very likely to overdose in which he did. Albert Doyle wants that information suppressed so he can use his phony “murder angle” he pushes instead. This is all about a hoaxer trying to push bogus information trying to cover up the real evidence. Well, this joker has failed miserably cuz he nobody takes him seriously and the real facts and evidence has been documented for 49 years and is etched in stone with real forensics that proved Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates.
Albert Doyle is the ultimate backstabbing “friend” who invites people into his life and then discards them when it suits him. This is why he can’t be trusted as there is always some ulterior motive for his actions. Just look at all the fake names he’s used to hide his true identity, and get away with saying anything he wants, and with discrediting others who disagree with what he thinks. This guy is no expert.
I was looking at a thread over at the “Deep Politics Forum” where Buster posts under his pseudonym “Albert Doyle”. Not sure why he chose “Albert” when his name is Brian.
Buster aka “Albert Doyle” was posting in his usual debate style making bogus claims and attacking the other posters saying they are ignoring “his good evidence”. “Albert” was making the same absurd claims that his “science” and his “arguments” are the best on the internet. “Albert Doyle” entered into a heated exchange with forum member Michael Cross and he wasn’t having any of “Albert Doyle’s” nonsense. Cross completely told Albert Doyle off and exposed him as the true fraud and hoaxer that he is. Buster with his many alias names promotes hoaxes in political conspiracies and with Jimi Hendrix. We pick up the action from here:
Albert Doyle: Mr Cross insults the intelligence of the readers by daring to offer this vs what I wrote.
Michael Cross: If the “readers” think I’m insulting their intelligence by calling you on the bullshit you purvey, they are welcome to chime in. All I see in this thread Albert, is a moderator that agreed with David, Jim D doing the same, Alan agreeing with us and another member astutely pointing out that there are no people in the Darnell image – there are shades of gray in arrangements that represent people in two dimensions. I don’t see a rush of Brian/Albert supporters queueing up to tout the relevancy of the crap you purvey.
Albert Doyle: You’re not answering the arguments I’m making. Instead you’re making excuses and entering this kind of crap. My posts contain good content and serious arguments of evidence. Your posts contain the above.
You ignored Drew’s math. You aren’t credible. You can’t ignore good science no matter what your excuse.
The fact you say there are no people seen in Darnell is demented and shows a lack of credible scrutiny of posts on the site’s behalf.
Michael Cross: Your “geometry” is by DEFINITION based on assumptions of placement and size. You don’t have a laser grid of the space, you don’t have actual positions of the people that were there, you have assumptions and estimations.
Albert Doyle: That isn’t true and when Drew spelled-out his precise math you ignored it. You’re a fool Mr Cross. You are ignoring the best arguments on the internet on this subject. They’re credible and can’t be ignored by anyone who considers themselves a credible analyzer of the subject.
Michael Cross: Is English your second language? You don’t seem to understand the meaning of what you write. You’re seriously asserting that the long series of responses to your disinformation is ignoring you?
Albert Doyle: If you honestly reviewed this thread, each and every time I asked Mr Cross to qualify that vs my arguments he fled.
It would be in the interest of those failing the arguments to call for a closing of the discussion.
Honestly, ROKC proxying should not be allowed on this issue.
Cheerleading is not a credibly enterable level of discussion at this point in comparison to the arguments being made.
Michael Cross: I don’t flee. I tire of your boorish bullshit.
There’s no reason to continually provide rebuttals to refute your imaginary proof. It only takes ONE accurate rebuttal to do so; your crap never changes. You claim you’re right because you’re right. Also, and this is becoming more and more apparent, your response to the rebuttals that are carefully offered smacks of a disinformation agent:
ROKC proxy, I’m a member there, haven’t posted or read anything in over a month (not sure I ever posted). Your accusation is without merit – its an attempt to distract from the point at hand, which is that your entire argument is invalid. EVERY POINT you’ve tried to make has been refuted in detail; in response you dismiss the truth by relying on various disnfo tactics – like trying to discredit your detractors by calling them proxies of another forum. Your “geometry” is by DEFINITION based on assumptions of placement and size. You don’t have a laser grid of the space, you don’t have actual positions of the people that were there, you have assumptions and estimations.
Proof is derived from absolutes, not estimations. THEORIES are derived from estimations.
You have nothing, and your attempt to discredit me or David by trying to associate me/us with another forum is an indication of the lack of depth of your position.
Your “points” have been completely countered with evidence. The fact that you either ignore them or don’t understand them changes nothing. Your “forensic” points are opinion, have no science behind them and are entirely worthless.
This post refuted everything Albert asserts. Everything.
You can prove nothing from that image Albert. Nothing.
Michael Cross has experienced the same rubbish arguments we have. The people and circumstances change but Buster’s dodgy reasoning remains the same. Buster posts what he calls “facts” and “evidence” but they’re neither what Buster offers is speculation and opinion. I’ve read what Buster says over at the political forum and his posts are just as long winded in an attempt to elbow out the opposition and take up more space on threads with what he calls the truth.
There’s a massive difference between JFK’s political assassination and Jimi’s drugs overdose. Yet Buster is trying to make Jimi’s death look like a murder as well. Lee Harvey Oswald was arrested for JFK’s murder but there was no murderer where Jimi was concerned although Buster is trying to blame this on two people namely Monika and Michael Jeffrey even though there is no proof or evidence of this at all. The attendants at the Samarkand hotel that morning were very sure about what they witnessed with Jimi-a drugs overdose. Clearly JFK died of a gun shot wound but Jimi didn’t die because of being waterboarded to death with red wine as hoaxers claim. What Jimi’s autopsy revealed, performed by Dr. Teare, was a significant barbiturate overdose as cause of death, and not resulting from an act of violence as was the case with JFK.
Continuing on, we read more of the prevarication of Buster posting under his pseudonym “Albert” Doyle at the “Deep Politics Forum” where he continues to eviscerate Ceasar Glebbeek and Monika Dannemann.
What’s both pathetic and hilarious is that Buster aka Albert Doyle uses the lies of Monika Dannemann for the main part of his hoax. And to top it all off folks, Buster aka Albert Doyle uses information from Ceasar Glebbeek after he’s been telling us how Ceasar is not credible and is a total fraud. So, after all this time (many years) of attacking these two people as vicious liars, this clown Buster aka Albert Doyle uses their stories for the major part of his own hoax. Can you believe that? All we can say is Buster aka Albert Doyle is a total fraud and has to be mentally ill. What sane individual would spend all that time on forums and websites for years evicerating two people and then use their claims as his own? This is downright insane, but Buster aka Albert Doyle uses their claims for his hoax. Then he will attack you when you tell him those claims are false, after he spent all that time before trashing those same false claims he is now using. There really is no words to explain what we are witnessing here except for insanity.
What is truly obvious though, is the deliberate attempt of Albert Doyle aka Buster to create a shroud of sinister intent when none exists. He does this by choosing carefully selected words and twisting the events into his own interpretation that involves the “mystery of murder” and accusing Michael Jeffery without any evidence. Albert Doyle creates the illusion that Jimi was “murdered” without any evidence with his fantasist writing style.
Albert Doyle aka Buster achieves this goal by asking rhetorical questions for the reader such as “was this Jeffery’s real intent?” when no evidence it exists. Doyle’s intent is to create the illusion of “murder” without presenting any evidence so he can claim his hoax. This is the number one tactic of a disinformation artist and it’s been in Doyle’s playbook for over a decade.
One thing is clear though, is that Buster aka Albert Doyle uses claims from what he reads in books. From there, he collects claims from various sources and puts them all together for his own hoax. He is no stranger to taking the story of one person as he fabricates it into a story for his own version peddling it for his hoax.
Buster aka Albert Doyle is no Jimi Hendrix expert. He is just a fraud hoaxer telling a story that he has created himself pretending to be a fiction novelist. He takes a story and then claims “this is what he really meant” only offering his false take and bogus opinion. That is not evidence or facts, it’s poorly made up conjecture where no real evidence can ever be attained for anything this prevaricator tries to assert.
Below as you read on you will witness the lies, conjecture, rhetorical questions, and the insanity of one “Buster” aka Brian Doyle posting under his alias “Albert Doyle”.
Albert Doyle: On pages 14 and 15 Caesar illustrates how the whole general scene around Jimi was becoming stormy like a maelstrom. Even the weather at the Isle of Fehmarn was acting in accordance. Billy, being in a paranoid state from being dosed, was picking-up this overhanging vibe more than the others and translating it into a direct sense of doom. Never once, however, does Caesar ever bother to consider that this sense of dread and apathy in both Billy and Jimi was at least partly attributable to Jimi’s dilemma with Jeffery, if not directly. On page 15 Jimi is quoted as saying it was no fun anymore and he no longer wanted to play. Now those who know Jimi Hendrix would realize it would take a lot for Jimi to say such a thing, since playing guitar was all Jimi lived for. Never once does Caesar ever bother to consider that Jeffery’s pressure on Jimi might have been the force behind this extreme comment.
JASON says: Albert Doyle aka Buster writes this passage dripping with fiction creating evil intent for Jimi Hendrix. Albert tries to even suggest the weather spelled doom for Jimi as he spins this fictional yarn. Buster aka Brian/Albert Doyle has no freaking clue how Jimi and Billy was feeling during that time, but this clown adds his own “might have been” just to further his hoax. Once again no evidence, but only carefully selected words to create an illusion of doom and despair. That’s how a hoaxer and disinformation artist operates.
Albert Doyle: On page 16 Jimi once again repeats to Karen Davis his intention to quit playing guitar. Again, anyone who knows Hendrix knows this wouldn’t have lasted too long, so what was driving Jimi towards these radical moves? Could it have been the death of Alan Wilson combined with news of the death of one of Steingarten’s clients in Vanilla Fudge, along with Billy’s being personally sabotaged? This never seems to dawn on Caesar who doesn’t even give it any consideration – even though it perfectly explains Jimi’s actions.
JASON says: Buster aka Albert Doyle again posts his own phony interpretation asking a rhetorical question which only adds up to pure conjecture. Doyle has no idea how Jimi was actually feeling at the time or what his intentions were. Buster aka Albert Doyle was not friends with Jimi or even knew Jimi Hendrix, so he has no idea how he was feeling at the time. “Albert” Doyle reads comments from authors in books and then fabricates those stories for his own hoax. This is all he does and it’s proven in the passages.
Albert Doyle: Page 23:
Here’s where Caesar really goes over the top and beyond the pale. Caesar again bifurcates this event by offering Philip Harvey’s version, then Monika’s. Harvey’s true account tells of Jimi, Monika, Anne Day, Penny Ravenhill, and himself all smoking grass and drinking wine. After a few hours Monika stormed-out of the room because Jimi was paying too much attention to the pretty young ladies. Harvey thought the wine Monika was drinking may have contributed. Harvey’s account is important because it tells of Monika having a screaming hysterical fit over this incident outside on the street. It also relates that Jimi and Monika left at 10:40pm after Monika could not be calmed-down. Monika’s version is that they left Harvey’s about 7:30 and returned to the Samarkand. Of course Caesar calls everyone else a liar and tries to validate Monika’s version. Never once does he consider that Monika created this false version in order to cover-up her screaming fit with Jimi or how it conflicted with the fairy tale romance she was trying to depict. Caesar then commits a brutal twist of reality by claiming Monika’s claim that Mitch never spoke to Jimi at the Samarkand was ‘incorrect’. Forget the fact Caesar forgets to mention Mitch’s own admission that he never spoke to Jimi at the Samarkand. The truth stands squarely on its head in Caesar’s three ring circus – with Caesar as the ringmaster. Caesar outright lies by suggesting Gerry Stickells spoke to Jimi at the Samarkand after they returned from Harvey’s. He a flagrant misquoter and rather sloppy context-distorter. Caesar seems to think he’s getting away with not explaining how Mitch could talk to Jimi at 7pm when even his own accounts make that impossible according to his own timeline. As usual Caesar deals with these insurmountable conflicts by ignoring them and hoping he’ll get away with it at his own word.
JASON says: Buster aka Albert Doyle writes his own fictional version of events, but look at the words he uses to attack and describe Ceasar Glebbeek in this passage.
Doyle says this about Ceasar: “He a flagrant misquoter and rather sloppy context-distorter.”
Buster aka Brian/Albert Doyle is using projection here cuz he is the biggest flagrant misquoter and context distorter on the planet making up lies for his hoax.
So, Buster aka Albert Doyle attacks Ceasar calling him a “liar, flagrant misquoter, and a sloppy context distorter” but after all that phony posturing from Buster aka Albert Doyle, he still uses Ceasar’s information for his own hoax. Buster aka Albert Doyle is nothing but a true phony and a hypocrite.
Albert Doyle: To further this offense Caesar then quotes Monika’s infamous lies about that night to reinforce his depiction. Anybody who quotes Monika directly in this event has pretty much destroyed their own credibility by that alone. Most researchers of this event agree Monika lied about the time periods involved with Harvey’s party because she didn’t want to admit she and Jimi had a row. And there you have Caesar Glebbeek trying to honor Monika’s known lies despite all this.
JASON says: You know folks, you sure gotta love what “Albert Doyle” has written here. “Albert” Doyle aka Buster is the gift that keeps on giving. He calls Monika an “infamous liar”, but it’s Monika’s “infamous lies” that “Albert” Doyle aka Buster uses for the main part of his hoax. Then when you call Monika’s lies out for what they are, “Albert” Doyle attacks you defending those same lies. This guy is nuts and will use any lie for his bogus hoax. Albert Doyle honors Monika’s lies cuz he uses her lies for his hoax.
One line that “Albert” Doyle wrote really stands out. “Albert” Doyle specifically says with much vigor: “Anybody who quotes Monika directly in this event has pretty much destroyed there own credibility.”
Heed your words Mr. Doyle, you have no credibility quoting and using Monika Dannemann’s lies for the major part of your hoax as you profusely defend those lies.
Albert Doyle: Page 25:
Caesar’s mad adventure into prevarication continues by quoting Monika’s claimed time of Jimi’s arrival at Kameron’s party as being about 1:30am. Many dispute this and think Monika dropped Jimi right off at Kameron’s after their fight at Harvey’s. In order to justify Monika’s lies Caesar is forced to split the accounts of that night into many different versions. He quotes Stella Douglas as saying they had ordered Thai take-out just as Monika returned and started buzzing on the intercom. Well, Tony Brown says there were no oriental take-outs open at 1am in London in 1970. Since Monika returned at least a half-hour after dropping Jimi off that means the times involved had to suggest Monika dropped Jimi at Kameron’s shortly after leaving Harvey’s. Caesar never bothers to inform people of Brown’s discovery. Nor does Caesar ever stop to consider that Jimi’s putting Monika (his alleged fiancee) off at Kameron’s was exactly because of the tantrum she threw at Harvey’s. Caesar is in denial of all this so he’s forced to ignore it in public. Another possibility is that Jimi did return to the Samarkand for a short period where he encountered Terry Slater. Slater later slipped and admitted to Earth magazine in December 1970 that he had seen Jimi at the flat on the evening of the 17th and that he was in a bad mood (most likely from Monika’s fit). Was Slater sent there by Jeffery to check-up on Jimi’s attempt to fire him? Slater never talked about this admission from then on. Again, Monika shows a need to cover-up nasty events between her and Jimi so she denies the confrontation at Kameron’s where she was attacked by members of the party. Monika displays a psychopathic tendency here because she is trying to deny an event that was witnessed by dozens. Caesar joins her.
JASON says: “Albert” Doyle invokes the name of Tony Brown but lies about the major details Mr. Brown wrote in his book. Tony Brown published in his book confirming Jimi died no later than 4 am and “Albert” Doyle lies saying it was 5:30 am to purposely push time until later. “Albert” Doyle aka Buster is no different than Monika Dannemann changing the death time until later to fit his needs. Then the hypocrite Doyle attacks Monika for changing times when he is doing the same damn thing. Pathetic and fraudulent indeed.
“Albert” Doyle aka Buster says Monika has “psychopathic tendencies” but he uses her version of events for the major part of his hoax. Only a psychopath like “Albert” Doyle aka Buster would attack Monika Dannemann for being a pathological liar and still use her lies for his hoax and then attack posters for calling out those lies as he then claims it’s the “facts and good evidence”. He has no freaking idea what he is claiming.
Albert Doyle: Here Monika shows a pattern of lies designed to get around her indefensible accounts.
JASON says: Really “Albert”? Hilarious how you use her pattern of lies and her indefensible accounts for your hoax as you profusely defend those lies. Then this clown will call you a “troll” when you expose these lies of Monika’s he endorses. You are a hypocrite or just mentally off.
Albert Doyle: Also on this page Monika claims she took 1 Vesparax sleeping tablet and went to bed at 6am. Vesparax were very strong and 1 tablet (twice the recommended dose of a half tablet) would cause serious sleep in the taker. Jimi was found fully-clothed and dead on top of an unslept-in bed. Monika’s claim of being in bed with Jimi doesn’t jibe with this evidence. Monika gives another example of key evidence here by saying Jimi wore his crucifix to bed like she had never seen him do before. Nowhere does it ever strike Caesar that this was a sign of Jimi’s fear of what Jeffery had threatened to do to him if he ever fired him. I think we all know what psychopathic Monika is indirectly hinting at here. Caesar continues by quoting Monika’s long-disproven account of that morning. Again, Caesar courts the bizarre by not realizing his own quoting of several conflicting versions of the cigarette trip, as told by Monika, only accents the fact she’s lying. Caesar never bothers to figure out why.
JASON says: Well, our hoaxer Buster aka “Albert” Doyle commits a mortal error with his hoax. “Albert” admits that Vesparax was very strong and 1 tablet was the recommended dosage . But here he is on this site claiming that Jimi could withstand taking 9 Vesparax and he couldn’t die from that dosage cuz he didn’t meet his imaginary threshold. See how he changes his fake claims?
Next we get this absurd comment from “Albert” with his usual deliberate attempt of sewing disinformation creating an illusion of doom and despair for Jimi based on nothing but his usual b.s. This hoaxer claims Jimi wore his Crucifix to bed cuz he was terrified of Jeffery’s threats of Jimi trying to fire him. Now this is total made up b.s. by this hoaxer cuz he has no idea why Jimi wore his Crucifix and he invokes Jeffery to create the illusion of an impending “murder” that never even existed. He then makes up his own bogus claim telling us Monika was hinting that doom was headed for Jimi. Albert does this in his coded language stating “I think we all know what psychopathic Monika is indirectly hinting at here”. This is precisely how a disinformation artist behaves. They make up a fake claim and create the illusion that it’s true with everybody believing that it is. Again, no evidence and only bullshit. That’s how this hoaxer operates.
Even more hilarious, once again, “Albert” is taking the claims of Monika Dannemann for his own hoax who he proclaims is a “psychopathic vicious liar and whoever quotes her has no credibility”. Mr. Doyle, you have no credibility and these deliberate attempts of yours to create a phony illusion of “murder” proves you to be a fraud cuz you have no evidence for any of the garbage you make up in your crazy head.
Albert Doyle: By now Caesar is in a full-fledged run with the devil. He utilizes a sleazy tactic of confirming that there was a cigarette shop Monika could have gone to on her claimed cigarette trip. Using this he then tries to parlay it into a confirmation of Monika’s 10:20am wake-up time story originally told to the Inquest.
JASON says: Where have we heard this before? Buster aka Albert Doyle calling somebody the devil.
Buster aka “Albert” Doyle calls Ceasar “sleazy” but still uses Ceasar’s information for his hoax. Head shaking stuff from the real sleazy hoaxer who uses many fake alias names to push this scam who is really named Mr. Brian Doyle.
Hi Jason, There’s a saying that if you repeat a lie often enough it then becomes the truth. With the Harvey account, Monika excludes this from all her reminisces and had Jimi and herself arriving back at the Samarkand by 8.30pm. This is to give the illusion that all was well between the happy couple eating a romantic dinner just the two of them. However as we know this never happened with Terry Slater noticing that there was no food in the flat and no evidence of any being cooked. The stuff you’re researched Jason only confirms what we’ve thought and believed all along about Mr. Brian Doyle.
Ivana,
Brian “Albert” Doyle subscribes to the theory “if you tell the same lies long enough then people will start to believe it” which is why he uses many fake names all over the internet repeating these same lies for over a decade.
Monika always needed to create the fantasy of her and Jimi being in love about to be married which is why she lied about the details until she killed herself. But the hoaxer Brian “Albert” Doyle makes up his own bogus “murder” fantasy scenario adding his own phony interpretation to Monika’s words.
As we continue on, Buster aka “Albert” Doyle is still on the attack disparaging Caesar Glebbeek and Monika Dannemann but still manages to use what they say for his own hoax. In this brief episode, we get more fiction, lies, phony interpretations, and pure bullshit from our grand hoaxer known as Brian Doyle using his alias “Albert” Doyle posting from the “Deep Politics Forum.
Albert Doyle: By now Caesar is in a full-fledged run with the devil. He utilizes a sleazy tactic of confirming that there was a cigarette shop Monika could have gone to on her claimed cigarette trip. Using this he then tries to parlay it into a confirmation of Monika’s 10:20am wake-up time story originally told to the Inquest. This takes real nerve because we have numerous conflicting accounts coming from many of the main witnesses, including Eric Burdon, who admitted Monika called him around dawn (5:45am). We also have Gerry Stickells admitting Terry Slater called him between 8 and 9am. Even after Judy Wong was gotten to and changed her story, she still said Monika called her around 9am. (Monika said she called Wong before Burdon, so that call had to be near 5:40am. Wong lied about the time of this call in order to cover what really happened). Caesar ignores all these conflicts and just focuses on Monika’s story, hoping his confirmation of the cigarette shop will carry it.
JASON says: Buster aka “Albert” Doyle starts off this entry calling Ceasar Glebbeek “sleazy” when “Albert” aka Brian Doyle has earned the title of sleazy all by himself.
“Albert” does his narration here admitting there is conflicting accounts coming from the witnesses but our hoaxer goes as far as calling Judy Wong a liar and taking part in a “cover up” that “Albert” Doyle lies about for his phony hoax.
The problem with these witness accounts, was if they were under the influence of drugs or alcohol that morning, then the details of that morning isn’t going to be crystal clear even for the same or next day when they were giving statements. Most of them were out partying until the early morning so that was a problem. Some of them were trying to remember their recollections from over 20 years later when they were on the record talking about it. People do forget details after periods of time. The fact there were so many conflicting accounts makes all these reports not credible for evidence, but Buster aka “Albert” Doyle picks the accounts that he feels fits well with his hoax as he fabricates them into his own fictional story of “intrigue and murder”.
The accusation that Judy Wong was “gotten to” and there was a “cover up” is nothing but garbage perpetrated by “Albert” Doyle who always makes this same exact claim when the evidence or a witness refutes the b.s. he peddles.
Albert Doyle: From there Caesar dutifully reports the calculated lies of Alvenia Bridges and any others who were involved in the cover-up. If you watch ‘The Man They Made God’ you’ll see Eric Burdon admit that Monika called at dawn and Alvenia went right over, yet in ‘Until We Meet Again’ Caesar presents Alvenia telling us Monika cleaned the flat on her own before the ambulance came. Like both Caesar and Monika, Alvenia manages to erase 5 hours of time by doing this.
JASON says: Now “Albert” Doyle adds Alvenia Bridges to his list of liars taking part in his fictional “cover up” that he spins for his hoax. “Albert” aka Brian Doyle purposely changed Jimi’s estimated death time to 5:30 am when Dr. Crompton confirmed it was 4 am. So, “Albert” is a hypocrite and a liar as usual attacking others for what he does on a regular basis.
Albert Doyle: To further his own damnation Caesar then prints Monika’s pure fabrications about meeting the ambulance attendants as they arrived, hearing from them Jimi would be all right, and then riding with them in the ambulance. All of these are confirmed lies proven by statements taken from all those involved, as well as private remarks from others involved at the time, yet there you have Caesar presenting them as verified and true. What is really creepy is the realization Monika may be repeating the words of the murderers when speaking about how the ambulance men told her Jimi would be all right. Or speaking about witnessing them tipping Jimi’s head back and keeping him from breathing.
JASON says: What we have here is pure bullshit on the part of “Albert” aka Brian Doyle using his disinformation tactics to spin his bogus “murder” hoax.
“Albert” adds his fake interpretation to what he claims Monika was saying as he adds his sinister account of his made up phony “murder” scenario. This hoaxer Doyle, uses the word “may be” which tells you it is not accurate and just made up. Without any evidence, since there isn’t any, Doyle creates his fantasy murder scenario where he says Monika was making these statements while under duress earlier. Doyle wants to make his hoax sound as sinister as possible adding the illusion of “murder” without ever having to prove his claims with real evidence. Doyle can only post illusion and fantasy cuz that’s all this man is…a true fake and a phony. Everybody who encounters this clown on the internet knows it as well.
There were no “murderers” cuz Jimi was not “murdered”, but this hoaxer Brian Doyle creates the illusion that there was one with his carefully selected words. These are his own fantasy claims and he tries to present them as real facts. Brian Doyle is just a clown who is telling his own tales of fiction to hoax the readers. Brian Doyle will stoop to any level to push this deranged hoax.
I mean how desperate and pathetic can this guy be? He has to use Monika’s words and say “maybe she was really saying this” as he adds his fake and phony story to continue his scam. This is what a hoaxer does who has no evidence, the hoaxer creates fantasy and the illusion of what they want you to believe. “Albert” Brian Doyle has done exactly that with his carefully selected words with his disinformation tactics to spin his “murder tale” of Jimi Hendrix without a single shred of evidence.
Amazing how “Albert” Doyle knows every single little detail of how these people behaved, what they were thinking, feeling, acting, saying when he never knew any of them. “Albert” knows the inner minds of Jimi Hendrix, Monika Dannemann, Michael Jeffery, and his phony “murderers” (whom he never names) for his fictional narration when he was never there in 1970 to know all these tales he invents. “Albert” knows all these tales cuz he is making up this entire farce in his crazy head for his hoax. This true definition of a hoaxer folks, and Brian Doyle has been doing this Hendrix hoax for over a decade now.
Buster’s long winded rants are just empty responses that mean absolutely nothing. His so called facts are anything but and his so called truth is anything but. All he’s good at is using rhetorical language to dupe people into believing what he says. Anyone who reads the full story of what really happened to Jimi would never fall for his mumbo-jumbo.
Buster is a storyteller and that’s all he is. When you counter him with facts, he becomes a deer in the headlight and is unable to give any credible answers.
I’ve won this “debate”…If you look at Jason’s answer to my last post he’s running from the facts I posted…My facts are reference-able and accurate which is why Jason hand-waves and runs but never really directly addresses or makes any credible attempt to refute them…Jason can’t get over the hurdle of the 1800mg of barbiturate 9 Vesparax possesses or how it relates to overdose forensics…Read Jason’s response…All it is is trash-talking bluster and blather designed to evade the fact he’s making no effort to answer my actual argument…
This debate is over…If Jason tried what he is doing there in any credibly moderated room or with a jury he would be ruled against and restricted from further participation…There’s no credible intelligent person who wouldn’t see that Jason is an obnoxious nut who is obviously over his head in murder evidence discussion and is simply answering skilled arguments and analyses with moronic trolling…Jason’s passage that I am coming up with fake mg numbers and thresholds is just the self-indicting stupidity of someone who is dumb enough to not realize he is only mocking himself because those forensic citations are dead accurate and it is pretty clear from Jason’s response that he’s too stupid to understand them and is only capable of moronic trolling in response…Jason is tripping over his own trolling as he runs because if he had any credible knowledge of what he speaks, instead of the skim-reading he is obviously doing, he would realize those forensics arguments are purely my own and that they refuted Glebbeek and his false claims using his own references…Jason mixes up the context of what is being argued and its source material because he has no idea what he is talking about and no working knowledge of the case…Jason first learned of this subject when he decided to troll this thread…So, as I said, that is a win in any credible forum so it dispenses the need to further respond to the obnoxious troll “Jason” that any credible forum would have banned long ago…
“Albert” aka Buster claims “he won” based on his phony made up claims. That is hilarious.
BUSTER says: I’ve won this “debate”…If you look at Jason’s answer to my last post he’s running from the facts I posted…My facts are reference-able and accurate which is why Jason hand-waves and runs but never really directly addresses or makes any credible attempt to refute them…Jason can’t get over the hurdle of the 1800mg of barbiturate 9 Vesparax possesses or how it relates to overdose forensics…Read Jason’s response…All it is is trash-talking bluster and blather designed to evade the fact he’s making no effort to answer my actual argument…
JASON says: How can you “win” when your phony facts are made up by you? The forensic autopsy results defeat any bogus claim you attempt to make. Dr. Rufus Crompton confirmed that Jimi died of a lethal barbiturate overdose that killed his liver. That is documented in Jimi’s autopsy. Not one of your phony claims can refute real science and forensics.
BUSTER says: : This debate is over…If Jason tried what he is doing there in any credibly moderated room or with a jury he would be ruled against and restricted from further participation…There’s no credible intelligent person who wouldn’t see that Jason is an obnoxious nut who is obviously over his head in murder evidence discussion and is simply answering skilled arguments and analyses with moronic trolling…Jason’s passage that I am coming up with fake mg numbers and thresholds is just the self-indicting stupidity of someone who is dumb enough to not realize he is only mocking himself because those forensic citations are dead accurate and it is pretty clear from Jason’s response that he’s too stupid to understand them and is only capable of moronic trolling in response…Jason is tripping over his own trolling as he runs because if he had any credible knowledge of what he speaks, instead of the skim-reading he is obviously doing, he would realize those forensics arguments are purely my own and that they refuted Glebbeek and his false claims using his own references…Jason mixes up the context of what is being argued and its source material because he has no idea what he is talking about and no working knowledge of the case…Jason first learned of this subject when he decided to troll this thread…So, as I said, that is a win in any credible forum so it dispenses the need to further respond to the obnoxious troll “Jason” that any credible forum would have banned long ago…
JASON says: Yes,,this debate is over. Your hoax was exposed as a bogus sham and you are a well known fraud all over the internet using false alias names to push your hoax. You have been banned from every forum and site you posted on. You never provide any evidence, only the crap you make up. The crap you made up was refuted 10 times over. Your hoax is done!
Buster knows full well he’s lost this debate. His language just sounds desperate to me; it’s the same rubbish over and over again still clinging onto his murder theory. No-one on the other forums believe him, and I remember reading a thread where a doctor was the moderator and she just gave him the cold shoulder with short sharp responses. He posted there under two aliases but there was no mistaking who it was; this goes way back.
Hi Ivana,
Buster’s arguments are weak and his opinions are not facts. He is out of gas. He should take a vacation and think up some brand new bogus claims. These all have been debunked.
Any medical professional would laugh at the junk Buster peddles.
Which fake alias names was Buster using?
Monika kept changing the time she woke up at every telling. In the Warner Bros documentary she said she checked Jimi’s pulse, he was breathing normally but she could not wake him while waiting for the ambulance. At the inquest Monika never mentioned going out for cigarettes or making several phone calls to various people like Judy Wong, Alvenia Bridges and Eric Burdon in the early hours. If Jimi died as early as 3-4am shortly after arriving back at the Samarkand then this explains the condition Jimi’s body was in when the ambulance arrived apparently several hours after death to take him to casualty. None of the attendants that morning suspected anything other than an overdose, and the autopsy confirmed this. At the inquest Dr Thurston reiterated Dr. Teare’s findings of a barbiturate overdose, if there was any hint of foul play involved then there would have been a murder trial with all the parties involved that morning called to give testimony. Dr. Teare found no evidence of violence involved in Jimi’s death.
No amount of denying and making up phony claims is going to change the real event of Jimi’s drug overdose, science, the human body, and the effects of drugs mixed with alcohol.
Vesparax is not meant to be abused and to be taken in an overdose in one setting. A half of pill to one pill was the proper dosage. Taking anything over that amount is an overdose. 9 pills is a lethal overdose and for “Albert” Brian Doyle to claim that it is not he is just full of shit and not a real participant in the Hendrix community. “Albert” Brian Doyle needs to claim Jimi could survive the lethal drug overdose so he can still make his phony wine claim. All the evidence refutes him and all he can do is make up fantasy stories denying the real evidence.
Mixing powerful uppers and downers will kill you. Taking 9 powerful downers with a powerful upper will certainly kill you. Then add alcohol to the mix that Jimi was drinking and you have your lethal overdose.
No matter what this hoaxer “Albert” Brian Doyle claims, the human body can not tolerate the mixing of these powerful drugs and alcohol together in one short setting. Having a “tolerance” does not protect you from an overdose when you go way above and beyond your tolerance. Jimi went way above and beyond his tolerance and overdosed as a result. “Albert” Brian Doyle doesn’t like hearing this but it’s a fact.
Claiming to have a tolerance doesn’t work when the amount taken goes above the tolerance. That’s why “Albert” Brian Doyle’s “tolerance” claim is a loser and he is easily refuted by science and the human body.
Well said, Jason, Jimi didn’t take the Vesparax as directed half to one tablet but took a massive overdose. How stupid to say that someone can outlive that because they have a tolerance. Clearly the meds killed him as nothing else was found to be the cause.
Exactly, but a troll like “Buster” can only use a blanket statement and claims it’s “science and forensics”.
Well, we have more fun from “Buster”. This time using his more well known trolling and hoaxing alias called “Scrum Drum”. Scrum Drum aka Buster infiltrated the “tdpri” site which is a guitar discussion forum to push his garbage “Hendrix Murder hoax” along with his same phony claims. Here is a good look at more of his blatant contradictions, bogus claims, and how he refutes them himself by changing his phony stories.
A poster asks “Scrum Drum” a question and you can see the bogus answer he gives followed by a blatant contradiction and changing of phony stories.
stnmtthw: Ok. How many bottles of wine were ejected out of Hendrix’s lungs? Was it measured?
Scrum Drum: Dr Bannister said it was put into a container but he doesn’t know what happened to it. Those things were handled by the nurses. He told me we were just trying to save his life at the time.
Scrum Drum: I’ve seen Bob Brown’s statement. He witnessed a dead Jimi Hendrix being trollied in to hospital. That’s because Jimi had been murdered 5 hours earlier as the facts show. Brown is now avoiding it because of the political consequences of what he witnessed.
JASON says: Hilarious stuff indeed and look at the ridiculous answer Brian Doyle aka Scrum Drum aka Buster comes back with for this question.
The poster was asking a precise question about how much imaginary phony wine was found in Jimi’s lungs claimed by our troll Brian Doyle aka Scrum Drum/Buster who couldn’t even muster a credible answer.
Look what he tells this poster, Brian Doyle aka Scrum Drum gives a bogus and a really vague answer that continues to prove himself to be a fraud. He has no clue of what exact measurement to say, since there was no “wine” and is making this whole thing up. He tells this chap that the “imaginary phony wine” was “put into a container and doesn’t know what happened to it”. Now does anybody believe this crap? Fraud Bannister has to be one of the Three Stooges. Can you imagine this “doctor” performing a serious procedure and then have no clue what happened to the evidence when he is supposed to document it, measure it, and send it off to be analyzed? Then Brian Doyle aka Scrum Drum gives the bogus excuse blaming the nurses for the mishap of the “missing wine”. Any competent doctor carefully documents any fluids and doesn’t lose the contents from a body. Brian Doyle aka Scrum Drum just made his pal Bannister look like a complete incompetent buffoon which would come as no surprise that he would get canned for malpractice.
Since this is just a bogus made up story, we know this whole phony described incident didn’t happen, but it’s sure a lousy story and excuse made by Brian Doyle. And then he claims that Fraud Bannister was trying to save Jimi’s life? Jimi was already dead for 7 1/2 hours, so there was no life saving attempt which proves this to be nothing but a load of crap being told in a forum by a well known hoaxer. So, this is a huge lie made up by Brian Doyle aka Scrum Drum tries to paint Fraud Bannister frantically trying to save Jimi’s life. Jimi was a dead rotting corpse, so Scrum Drum aka Buster got busted with this bogus claim that refutes his own hoax.
Now looking at his second quote, Scrum Drum aka Buster aka Brian Doyle says Jimi was “murdered 5 hours earlier”. So, how could Fraud Bannister be trying to save Jimi’s life when Scrum Drum aka Buster contradicts his own claim when he now is saying that Jimi was dead for 5 hours before? You certainly can’t save the life of a 5 hour dead man. So, Scrum Drum aka Buster debunks and refutes his own hoaxing claim, just further proving his fake stories to be nothing but a fraud. No evidence of a “murder” but this trolling hoaxer claims it anyway.
He also manages to add his sinister plot at the end of the sentence where he says “Brown is now avoiding it because of the political consequences of what he witnessed.”
This fake story by Scrum Drum aka Buster is just another load of crap only made up by him as his tells his fake tales of fantasy. This is how he spins his hoax folks, just makes up a sinister plot involving the government when none exists. He makes up the bogus claim and wants you to believe it’s “evidence and facts”, when he can never offer any proof for the crap he spews.
Let’s go back to the first quote again to show you how this trolling fraud changes his phony stories. He says one thing on one site and then changes his stories when he posted here a few months ago. Keep in mind, that a real event never changes, but Scrum Drum aka Buster’s “events” always change when it suits him as he tells his tales cuz he is just pushing a hoax.
Scrum Drum: Dr Bannister said it was put into a container but he doesn’t know what happened to it. Those things were handled by the nurses.
Buster: Dr Bannister disposed of the wine down the drain.
JASON says: So, our wine troll Buster aka Scrum Drum aka Brian Doyle first says the phony wine was put into a container and Fraud Bannister had no idea what happened to it.
Brian Doyle using his Buster alias here says, Fraud Bannister dumped the phony wine down the drain himself. That would mean Bannister would know what happened to it, since he’s the one dumping it out.
So, we have a change of fake stories here. Which story does this hoaxer Scrum Drum/Buster aka Brian Doyle want to go with? Which one? It can’t be both.
Also, don’t forget he changed it a third time when he claimed late last year that both Fraud Bannister and Dr. Siefert dumped the phony wine out together. How many times is he going to change his fake story? Again, this proves his bogus stories to be a hoax cuz an event can’t keep changing when he wants it to.
We surely can’t forget the most famous phony claim that Buster aka Brian Doyle has used here regarding Fraud Bannister and the phony wine, can we? Of course not! Scrum Drum/Buster aka Brian Doyle always claims now that Jimi had “5 bottles of wine removed from his lungs and stomach”. He claims that Bannister told him that. But on the tdpri site, he states he just “interviewed Bannister” but does not mention the phony “5 bottles of wine” claim. Scrum Drum/Buster aka Brian Doyle only says a “container”. See what I am getting at?
So, how could Fraud Bannister fit “5 bottles of wine into one container? How would Fraud Bannister know there were “5 bottles of wine” when he didn’t even measure the amount of wine? Scrum Drum said the nurses lost it. Why did Scrum Drum/Buster aka Brian Doyle not make his “5 bottles of wine claim” then and only say “wine in a container?” That’s really obvious folks. Scrum Drum/Buster aka Brian Doyle just made up in phony “5 bottles of wine claim in his crazy head for his hoax. The reason he didn’t mention it on that site then, is cuz he hadn’t thought of it yet! If you look at his Amazon comments posting under his other aliases Ralph Yates and Albert Doyle, he first claimed 3 bottles of wine. Then as under another alias as jetblast on the “straight dope” forum he claimed 4 bottles of wine. Then finally here as Buster, he changed and upped it to 5 bottles. So, this fraud troll has changed the number of bottles from 3 to 4 and now to 5. But where it really counts is this tdpri site, where he doesn’t mention a specific number at all. He claimed he just spoke to Bannister but only mentions a “container”. Yes folks, this phony “5 bottles of wine” claim is just made up by this hoaxer himself, and we all know there never was any wine, with this just continuing to prove it. This also makes certain this troll never even spoke with Fraud Bannister as he claims.
Scrum Drum/Buster aka Brian Doyle’s answer to that poster proved his story to be a fake. A reputable doctor doesn’t lose medical evidence from a body when he has to document and measure it. Nurses don’t lose track of it either and that is not the responsibility of the nurses to handle when it wasn’t even documented in the medical report. We all know there was no phony wine removal in the first place but this ridiculous answer proves this claim to be a hoax just on it’s stupidity alone.
What an aburd answer to give. The wine was lost by the nurses so he doesn’t know. That is weak and pathetic trolling and Scrum Drum/Buster aka Brian Doyle sure didn’t put much thought into that crappy answer. Later on as he thought about it, we get the phony 3 then 4 and now 5 bottles of wine. Easy to see how this troll made up new fake stories through the years.
Then trying to claim Fraud Bannister tried to save Jimi’s life when we all know Jimi was dead for 7 1/2 hours when he was brought to the hospital. More nonsense and absurdity.
One thing for sure is that Scrum Drum/Buster aka Brian Doyle never interviewed Fraud Bannister cuz there is no way he would give such ridiculous answers to anybody. Yes, these fake claims are just coming from Scrum Drum/Buster aka Brian Doyle cuz this is the kind of bullshit claims he passes off for his phony evidence and so called
interviews.
Then a couple of posts later, he contradicts the whole thing by stating Jimi was dead for 5 hours. So then there would be no way Fraud Bannister would be trying to save Jimi’s life when he just lied before claiming he was doing that.
Finally we have the bogus claim of sinister intent of “political consequences” for Doctor Bob Brown which is made up by this troll Scrum Drum/Buster in his crazy head. And the changing of fake “dumping” out the wine stories to Fraud Bannister not knowing what happened to the fake wine.
We see Scrum Drum/Buster aka Brian Doyle as nothing but a fake story teller, and a bad one at that, making up even worse stories traveling like a gypsy from one site to the next pushing this laughable debunked hoax that gets more absurd each time he tells it.
I’ve read the rubbish below by the man of many pseudonyms, and it’s all full of false science and deluded ramblings. He even tries to claim that he isn’t Flyswatter although we know that he is. Nothing this fool posts can be trusted in anyway, and he should go the way of Wright’s book in the bargain basement bin.
We all know he is “Flyswatter”. He makes up fake claims and peddles his b.s. He does this with Jimi Hendrix and if your read the political forums he does the same with JFK conspiracies. He is not taken seriously whenever he posts and his makes up his own claims for science that he says “can’t be refuted”.
Well, Jimi’s autopsy will always refute him no matter what bogus claims he tries to use.
Jason is just repetition trolling the same shit over and over in the face of sound data he can’t answer…A credibly moderated room would do what should have been done and restrict Jason’s posting ability because he is not answering facts and is continuing to get away with marring the quality of this site by basically responding to sound argument with offhand trolling…Jason is lying when he says I am making up facts…Dr Crompton was never made to answer for what I am posting here and if I could have legally challenged him in public he would not have been able to answer my forensic arguments just like Jason can’t answer them…Jason trolls by means of ignoring Crompton’s incriminating statements while overemphasizing Crompton’s corrupted statements where he was brought in on the conspiracy…A credible analyzer would realize Crompton never answered for his original statements and they can’t be dismissed so easily as Jason attempts…
If you read Jason’s trolling answers he never answers the fact 9 Vesparax won’t produce an overdose in a person with a notorious tolerance…Jason uses classic trolling exaggeration and language but he still hasn’t answered the basic fact you can’t overdose or “destroy your liver” if you took 9 Vesparax while having a well-known tolerance like Jimi did…That’s why the manufacturer lists “9 or 10 tablets” as Lethal Dose…Again, anyone with any credible knowledge can see Jason running from this in the thread and trying to answer it with trolling…If I remember correctly one of the London Coroner’s Office doctors said Jimi did not have enough barbiturate to overdose as well as Monika’s doctors…None of them mentioned any crazy destruction of the liver etc…Jason pads his trolling failure with lies by once again saying the autopsy proved overdose…Jason is playing with semantics because the autopsy never proved overdose or they would have used the word “poisoning” like they do with confirmed Lethal Dose deaths as Flyswatter pointed-out…The Inquest used the word “Intoxication” instead of poisoning because they knew Lethal Dose had not been reached…Jason knows this but he is trolling the same idiotic replies anyway…Which is why he should be posting-restricted by any credible moderator…
Anyone can see Jason running from the real science and forensics he can’t answer in this thread…Jason has publicly failed to answer that 9 Vesparax contains 1800mg of Secobarbital…Firm barbiturate science dictates that a person with Jimi’s tolerance for barbiturates requires at least 3000mg to reach Lethal Dose…At 1800mg Jimi wasn’t even close…Jason trollishly, moronically ignores that the manufacturer must follow law and list Lethal Dose for those with no tolerance in order to cover those who are most susceptible…A different rule applies to regular users who require a higher amount to reach Lethal Dose…Jason can’t answer this so he ignores it and enters idiotic answers that equal a neanderthal chanting that “Vesparax are very bad and they kill” in response to the finer science he obviously can’t answer…
Jason tries to get around this by entering semantics instead of honest argument…He works backwards from 1 pill and claims that anyone who took more than 1 pill was taking a (semantic) “overdose”…But that isn’t how competent science works out in the real world of non-trolling adults…Anyone can see Jason rushing to deliberately undetailed trolling blather in order to avoid the fact he’s obviously unable to deal with or credibly answer the FACT 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate and that Jimi needed much more than that to reach Lethal Dose…The reason the real world adults who determined Lethal Dose for Vesparax go right to “9 or 10 tablets” is because that is the amount that people need to know…But the reason Monika’s doctors said Jimi would not have died from Monika’s pills is because they went even further in to the specific particulars I am mentioning that Jason is obviously desperately trying to avoid with moronic trolling that never answers the facts and seeks to pawn-off bad conclusions hidden in stupid generalities…
Jason is an idiot and his claim that Jimi went “way above his tolerance” is easily refuted…Jason says this right in the face of the manufacturer listing a 10th tablet being needed to reach Lethal Dose…Jason deliberately ignores in public that the Lethal Dose published by the manufacturer is for persons with no tolerance…Read Jason’s responses and he avoids this every time and ignores it…Jason is not afraid to insult the intelligence of the reader and anyone with common sense can see Jason avoids the tolerance issue because he knows it disproves him and he can’t credibly answer it…Knowing this Jason tries a childish lie to get around it by claiming “Jimi went way beyond his tolerance” – but that is silly because the manufacturer listed a 10th tablet being necessary for persons with no tolerance, which means, at 9 tablets, Jimi and his notorious tolerance were not even close because barbiturate science says the worst cases of tolerance require up to 10,000mg to reach Lethal Dose…Jason tries to confront this with kiddie trolling but anyone can check my numbers and they come from barbiturate science and are correct – which is why internet troll Jason never cites any sources to counter them…Jason is lying here and, once shown, forfeits the debate…It is why I beat him long ago for any credible observer…
Jason loses this debate because a person with a well known tolerance requires 3 or even 4 thousand milligrams of barbiturate to reach Lethal Dose…The stimulant in the amphetamine Jimi took would only work in Jimi’s favor…Jimi only had 1800mg of barbiturates in him from 9 Vesparax and in his particular case he safely needed 3 or 4000mg to reach Lethal Dose – and that would have taken 4 hours minimum to kill him if he had, according to case studies of Vesparax…Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 or 2 hours and Jason has uncredibly failed to account for this…These are the firm forensics Jason is failing to answer and his use of demented trolling to try to compensate only digs his grave deeper as far as this debate and personal credibility…Only a moron would try what Jason is trying…There is no comparison between our inputs…
Buster aka Brian Doyle enters his same fictitious argument that “Jimi had a famous tolerance to drugs, therefore he could not die from them.”
This is a bogus blanket statement that’s been refuted by the forensics in Jimi’s autopsy, that proves Jimi had lethal barbiturate poisoning. Dr. Teare testified to this at the inquest and it was published in every newspaper on September 29 and 30 1970. This was also confirmed by Dr. Rufus Crompton to Kathy Etchingham who published this information in her book. William Saunders also published this in his book.
This troll Buster aka Brian Doyle makes up fake “forensics” for his bogus claim telling you that “Jimi couldn’t have died from taking 9 pills cuz he needed a 10th.” He makes this absurd claim to push his debunked hoax. The forensics of Jimi’s liver proved that 9 pills was lethal cuz it destroyed his liver from barbiturate poisoning.
Buster says you can’t die from 9 pills. Vesparax were not made to take 9 pills at once along with glasses of wine and a powerful amphetamine. Perhaps Buster can swallow 9 pills with wine along with an amphetamine cuz he claims he can’t die from it.
His claims are useless and have been laughed at for years. Jimi’s autopsy proves he died from a lethal dose of barbiturates. This is documented science and is a fact that has been published.
BUSTER says: Jason is just repetition trolling the same shit over and over in the face of sound data he can’t answer…A credibly moderated room would do what should have been done and restrict Jason’s posting ability because he is not answering facts and is continuing to get away with marring the quality of this site by basically responding to sound argument with offhand trolling…Jason is lying when he says I am making up facts…Dr Crompton was never made to answer for what I am posting here and if I could have legally challenged him in public he would not have been able to answer my forensic arguments just like Jason can’t answer them…Jason trolls by means of ignoring Crompton’s incriminating statements while overemphasizing Crompton’s corrupted statements where he was brought in on the conspiracy…A credible analyzer would realize Crompton never answered for his original statements and they can’t be dismissed so easily as Jason attempts…
JASON says: Stop whining. Everything that I’ve posted is facts. it is documented facts that you ignore. What you post is made up garbage and when it’s refuted, you make up something new to replace it with. We have all your fake story changes here throughout the years. Your “forensics” is a complete joke that you made up. There is nothing credible or science related to what you claim. Dr. Rufus Crompton would laugh in your face with the nonsense you write. Kathy Etchingham laughs at crazy conspiracy theorists just like you who make these bogus claims. She did a real investigation, got the results and confirmation, then she published it.
BUSTER says: If you read Jason’s trolling answers he never answers the fact 9 Vesparax won’t produce an overdose in a person with a notorious tolerance…Jason uses classic trolling exaggeration and language but he still hasn’t answered the basic fact you can’t overdose or “destroy your liver” if you took 9 Vesparax while having a well-known tolerance like Jimi did…That’s why the manufacturer lists “9 or 10 tablets” as Lethal Dose…Again, anyone with any credible knowledge can see Jason running from this in the thread and trying to answer it with trolling…If I remember correctly one of the London Coroner’s Office doctors said Jimi did not have enough barbiturate to overdose as well as Monika’s doctors…None of them mentioned any crazy destruction of the liver etc…Jason pads his trolling failure with lies by once again saying the autopsy proved overdose…Jason is playing with semantics because the autopsy never proved overdose or they would have used the word “poisoning” like they do with confirmed Lethal Dose deaths as Flyswatter pointed-out…The Inquest used the word “Intoxication” instead of poisoning because they knew Lethal Dose had not been reached…Jason knows this but he is trolling the same idiotic replies anyway…Which is why he should be posting-restricted by any credible moderator…
JASON says: You are “Flyswatter”. That is another one of your fake alias names that you post with. The word “poisoning” was used. Dr. Teare confirmed that Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning at the inquest. That was documented and published in all the newspapers in 1970. I already posted that evidence here but you ignored it. it was also published in William Saunders book ‘Hendrix London” that I posted.
Your bogus fake “tolerance’ claim is a joke. it is a blanket claim you use for your hoax. Jimi went way above his tolerance and died from a lethal drug overdose. That was confirmed in the autopsy and will forever be the case.
BUSTER says: Anyone can see Jason running from the real science and forensics he can’t answer in this thread…Jason has publicly failed to answer that 9 Vesparax contains 1800mg of Secobarbital…Firm barbiturate science dictates that a person with Jimi’s tolerance for barbiturates requires at least 3000mg to reach Lethal Dose…At 1800mg Jimi wasn’t even close…Jason trollishly, moronically ignores that the manufacturer must follow law and list Lethal Dose for those with no tolerance in order to cover those who are most susceptible…A different rule applies to regular users who require a higher amount to reach Lethal Dose…Jason can’t answer this so he ignores it and enters idiotic answers that equal a neanderthal chanting that “Vesparax are very bad and they kill” in response to the finer science he obviously can’t answer…
JASON says: I am following and using science. You are making up useless and bogus claims trying to peddle it as “science”. The forensic analysis of Jimi’s body determined he died from a lethal overdose. The amount of barbiturates that Jimi took destroyed his liver. Dr Rufus Crompton confirmed that Jimi would have died from the amount of drugs in his liver. The reason he died sooner was he inhaled and suffocated on his own vomit. William Saunders also confirms this his book. Kathy Etchingham wrote this in her book and always says this is exactly how Jimi died. Your “tolerance” claim is a joke and has been proven to be so.
BUSTER says: Jason tries to get around this by entering semantics instead of honest argument…He works backwards from 1 pill and claims that anyone who took more than 1 pill was taking a (semantic) “overdose”…But that isn’t how competent science works out in the real world of non-trolling adults…Anyone can see Jason rushing to deliberately undetailed trolling blather in order to avoid the fact he’s obviously unable to deal with or credibly answer the FACT 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate and that Jimi needed much more than that to reach Lethal Dose…The reason the real world adults who determined Lethal Dose for Vesparax go right to “9 or 10 tablets” is because that is the amount that people need to know…But the reason Monika’s doctors said Jimi would not have died from Monika’s pills is because they went even further in to the specific particulars I am mentioning that Jason is obviously desperately trying to avoid with moronic trolling that never answers the facts and seeks to pawn-off bad conclusions hidden in stupid generalities…
JASON says: More twisting of facts with your bogus narration of how “you claim it to be.” The fact is that 1 Vesparax was the proper dosage for a 200 pound man that gave you 8 hours sleep. Jimi was not 200 pounds and took 9 Vesparax all at once. These pills were not designed to be taken in a mass amount all at once. Jimi drank alcohol and took a powerful black bomber amphetamine on top of this which you always ignore. That is what killed him and this troll tries to argue fake mg claims based on his own made up nonsense. The 9 Vesparax caused poisoning in Jimi’s body that killed him. This is confirmed in Jimi’s autopsy report. This troll Buster cannot deny that.
BUSTER says: Jason is an idiot and his claim that Jimi went “way above his tolerance” is easily refuted…Jason says this right in the face of the manufacturer listing a 10th tablet being needed to reach Lethal Dose…Jason deliberately ignores in public that the Lethal Dose published by the manufacturer is for persons with no tolerance…Read Jason’s responses and he avoids this every time and ignores it…Jason is not afraid to insult the intelligence of the reader and anyone with common sense can see Jason avoids the tolerance issue because he knows it disproves him and he can’t credibly answer it…Knowing this Jason tries a childish lie to get around it by claiming “Jimi went way beyond his tolerance” – but that is silly because the manufacturer listed a 10th tablet being necessary for persons with no tolerance, which means, at 9 tablets, Jimi and his notorious tolerance were not even close because barbiturate science says the worst cases of tolerance require up to 10,000mg to reach Lethal Dose…Jason tries to confront this with kiddie trolling but anyone can check my numbers and they come from barbiturate science and are correct – which is why internet troll Jason never cites any sources to counter them…Jason is lying here and, once shown, forfeits the debate…It is why I beat him long ago for any credible observer…
JASON says: LOL. Here we go again with the bogus 10th pill claim. Jimi mixed alcohol and a powerful amphetamine with these 9 pills. Jimi’s autopsy said he died from a lethal overdose of barbiturates that killed his liver. These bogus claims by “Buster” are all after the fact claims that are useless. The autposy proved Jimi died from a lethal overdose. .
Associated Press
September 30, 1970
“During the autopsy of guitarist and musician Jimi Hendrix, hydroxyzines were found in his stomach, and barbiturates and amphetamines were found in his blood.”
From the book: “Hendrix London” by William Saunders:
“The pathologist, Professor Donald Teare, gave the cause of Jimi’s death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate poisoning. This meant that Jimi did not die because he vomited in his sleep, but vomited because he was already dying. It is a subtlety that is easy to miss.” Hendrix London p. 138 William Saunders
Through Gypsy Eyes” by Kathy Etchingham:
“Donald Teare, the man who had actually done the autopsy on Jimi, was dead so we needed to talk to another expert. Dr Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School had worked with Professor Teare. We gave him a copy of the autopsy report and asked how, in his opinion, Jimi had died.
‘He would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway,’ he told us. ‘The fact that he vomited and inhaled the vomit just hastened it. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it.”
JASON says: All documented science and forensics folks. Jimi died from a lethal drug overdose. Science and forensics proved it. These are documented facts and this troll “Buster” can only deny it with his made up bogus stories that change whenever he wants it to.
BUSTER says: Jason loses this debate because a person with a well known tolerance requires 3 or even 4 thousand milligrams of barbiturate to reach Lethal Dose…The stimulant in the amphetamine Jimi took would only work in Jimi’s favor…Jimi only had 1800mg of barbiturates in him from 9 Vesparax and in his particular case he safely needed 3 or 4000mg to reach Lethal Dose – and that would have taken 4 hours minimum to kill him if he had, according to case studies of Vesparax…Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 or 2 hours and Jason has uncredibly failed to account for this…These are the firm forensics Jason is failing to answer and his use of demented trolling to try to compensate only digs his grave deeper as far as this debate and personal credibility…Only a moron would try what Jason is trying…There is no comparison between our inputs…
JASON says: “Buster” is making up more fake stories for his hoax. “Buster” is no doctor, he is a clown. Buster has no idea what a human body can tolerate when a mass amount of drugs are ingested all at once. Not even a doctor would make these absurd claims.
Jimi went way above his tolerance and died. All the forensics and medical science proved it. Your phony claims and how you want it to be is nothing but fiction. You are right about that, you make up b.s. and I post the facts. Science and the documented forensics will always defeat you.
We believe in the real science not Buster’s make believe ones. Buster’s are fabricated and come from his own beliefs and not to be mistaken for what really happened on 18th September, 1970.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying when he says I am making up facts…Dr Crompton was never made to answer for what I am posting here and if I could have legally challenged him in public he would not have been able to answer my forensic arguments just like Jason can’t answer them…Jason trolls by means of ignoring Crompton’s incriminating statements while overemphasizing Crompton’s corrupted statements where he was brought in on the conspiracy.
JASON says: LMAO. Everything you post you make up dude. I’ve posted many many posts with the garbage you make up and lie about. Then when that doesn’t work for you, we get a brand new fake claim from you once again,.
What you are posting here is crap and complete nonsense. Nothing about what you write has anything to do with “forensics”. In fact, you don’t even know the meaning of the word. Making up a blanket statement that “Jimi couldn’t die from pills cuz he had famous tolerance” is not forensics, that is only your ridiculous opinion.
Your “forensic argument” is a joke, and would be laughed at by any medical professional. Kathy Etchingham laughs at nuts like you.
Here goes “Buster” with his bogus imaginary conspiracy and ‘corrupted statements” claim. When the real documented evidence and forensics refute “Buster”, he claims a conspiracy and a “cover up” to keep pushing his dead hoax.
Buster becomes angry when science and forensics refute his hoax. He becomes more angry when doctors confirm the facts. Buster can’t have the facts revealed, so the first thing he does is whines “it’s a cover up”. it’s easy for him to say, but its a fake useless claim.
There was no conspiracy or a “cover up”. There was nothing to cover up. This is a bogus claim from “Buster” who can never prove his asinine claim.
Kathy Etchingham contacted Crompton to get more information about Jimi’s autopsy and she was satisfied with the results.
As if Dr. Crompton would be made to answer anything Buster says.LOL. There’s a reason why Monika’s doctor told her to take only half a tablet because they were particularly strong; Jimi took nine and they killed him. He died after a short time of arriving back at the Samarkand not even having enough time to undress and get into bed this a tell tail sign of a massive overdose; an amount so toxic that they caused Jimi to choke on his own vomit in an unconscious state and then destroyed his liver. Buster is good at using bravado but it’s all smoke and mirrors essentially amounting to nothing.
Imagine thinking that nine Vesparax tablets aren’t going to cause a bad reaction in someone when the normal dose is half a tablet. We can never verify what conspiracy theorist are saying because it’s all made up coming from the deepest recesses of their imaginations. They can change the story as it suits them because what their presenting isn’t real just like a fairytale. These hoaxers rewrite the story giving the reader false claims all in an attempt to dupe the unsuspecting. Their facts simply don’t exist so it’s pointless to even go looking for them.
Buster the clown says Jimi could have taken 9 more Vesparax and still not have met his “tolerance threshold” yet. Just more complete absurd nonsense.
Excellent point you made Ivana.
Buster always demands for the person to answer “his evidence” and then he says you are unable to answer it so therefore you lose the debate. “His evidence” is not evidence, it’s made up garbage by him that he changes each time he argues with you. It’s non existent evidence that has no relevance and there is no real answer for it. That’s how he runs his hoaxing debate style. But as always, the garbage he peddles is always easily refuted by real evidence and medical science.
BUSTER says: If you read Jason’s trolling answers he never answers the fact 9 Vesparax won’t produce an overdose in a person with a notorious tolerance…Jason uses classic trolling exaggeration and language but he still hasn’t answered the basic fact you can’t overdose or “destroy your liver” if you took 9 Vesparax while having a well-known tolerance like Jimi did…That’s why the manufacturer lists “9 or 10 tablets” as Lethal Dose…
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: “Jimi would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway. The fact that he vomited and inhaled the vomit just hastened it. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it.”
BUSTER says: Again, anyone with any credible knowledge can see Jason running from this in the thread and trying to answer it with trolling…If I remember correctly one of the London Coroner’s Office doctors said Jimi did not have enough barbiturate to overdose as well as Monika’s doctors…None of them mentioned any crazy destruction of the liver etc…
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: “Jimi would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway. The fact that he vomited and inhaled the vomit just hastened it. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it.”
BUSTER says: Jason pads his trolling failure with lies by once again saying the autopsy proved overdose…Jason is playing with semantics because the autopsy never proved overdose or they would have used the word “poisoning” like they do with confirmed Lethal Dose deaths as Flyswatter pointed-out…The Inquest used the word “Intoxication” instead of poisoning because they knew Lethal Dose had not been reached…Jason knows this but he is trolling the same idiotic replies anyway…Which is why he should be posting-restricted by any credible moderator…
Associated Press September 28, 1970: Prof. Donald Teare, a pathologist, said Mr. Hendrix, who was 27 years old, had died as a result of having swallowed vomit caused by barbiturate poisoning.
From the book: “Hendrix London” by William Saunders: The pathologist, Professor Donald Teare, gave the cause of Jimi’s death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate poisoning. This meant that Jimi did not die because he vomited in his sleep, but vomited because he was already dying.
JASON says: Buster is repeating the same crap over and over. Is that all you got, Buster?
I thought you being a self proclaimed “Jimi Hendrix expert” would have more in the tank. You’re almost out of fumes. Repeating “troll” and “trolling” isn’t going to help you. Neither is lying about Jimi’s destroyed liver and drug overdose due to barbiturate poisoning. Dr. Teare, Dr. Crompton, Kathy Etchingham, William Saunders, and the Associated Press all defeat your hoaxing and your denial claims. The forensic autopsy and the doctors confirmed Jimi’s liver was destroyed due to barbiturate poisoning. This is all based on real documented forensic evidence. Your lies, denials, and your phony opinions on drug tolerance have been easily defeated. We all can see you don’t have credible knowledge on anything medical or with Jimi Hendrix.
The vomit was a reaction to the toxic level of barbiturate that Jimi took. I like to think that Jimi wasn’t thinking clearly when he took Monika’s Vesparax. He’d been out most of the day with Monika, and returned to the Samarkand early in the morning after Kameron’s party. Jimi was registered at the Cumberland Hotel and only stayed with Monika very briefly. The items of clothing he bought at the market he took back to the Cumberland and not to Monika’s hotel implying that he had no intention of staying there long term. Jimi’s guitar was the only thing left behind at the Samarkand, and the clothing Jimi was wearing soiled with vomit when he died.
BUSTER says: Anyone can see Jason running from the real science and forensics he can’t answer in this thread…Jason has publicly failed to answer that 9 Vesparax contains 1800mg of Secobarbital…Firm barbiturate science dictates that a person with Jimi’s tolerance for barbiturates requires at least 3000mg to reach Lethal Dose…At 1800mg Jimi wasn’t even close…Jason trollishly, moronically ignores that the manufacturer must follow law and list Lethal Dose for those with no tolerance in order to cover those who are most susceptible…A different rule applies to regular users who require a higher amount to reach Lethal Dose…Jason can’t answer this so he ignores it and enters idiotic answers that equal a neanderthal chanting that “Vesparax are very bad and they kill” in response to the finer science he obviously can’t answer…
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: The barbiturate level in Hendrix’s blood, 0.7 mg/100 ml was above the toxic level of 0.5 mg/100 ml.
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: “Jimi would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it.”
Associated Press 9/28/70: Prof. Donald Teare, a pathologist, said Mr. Hendrix, who was 27 years old, had died as a result of having swallowed vomit caused by barbiturate poisoning.
From the book: “Hendrix London” by William Saunders: The pathologist, Professor Donald Teare, gave the cause of Jimi’s death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate poisoning.
JASON says: The phony “Doctor of Forensics” Brian Doyle aka Buster looking like a fool again typing with fake bluster throwing out asinine mg numbers that he doesn’t know a damn thing about. His usual hoax game falls apart here as his phony “forensics” he made up on his own is totally destroyed by real forensics and documented evidence.
Brian Doyle aka Buster has no idea what the term forensics means as he always misuses the word inserting his made up deliberate misinformation instead.
Buster’s bogus “Jimi’s famous tolerance” claim was destroyed by Dr. Rufus Crompton who said Jimi died from a lethal barbiturate overdose proving Jimi did not have a famous tolerance to Vesparax cuz the mg level was above toxic. Barbiturate poisoning was confirmed by Dr. Teare and published by the Associated Press and William Saunders and once again confirmed by Dr. Rufus Crompton.
Buster the clown hilariously makes up foolish claims from the “manufacturers” but the real forensic numbers in Jimi’s blood showed the barbiturate level to be 0.7mg which is over the 0.5mg toxic level proving it to be lethal. Dr. Teare confirmed that this lethal level was obviously barbiturate poisoning.
The hoaxer known as Brian Doyle aka Buster made up an asinine claim for “different rules” for someone with a “tolerance” and one with not. Nothing about this garbage is accurate and is just made up by this hoaxing clown.
Yes moron, Vesparax is very bad when someone like Jimi Hendrix takes a massive overdose cuz it will kill you, just like Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that was toxic to his system proven by forensic medical science. All this documented forensic medical evidence debunks your bogus hoax once again.
Hi Jason, It’s so irresponsible to suggest that going against the recommended dose for Vesparax isn’t toxic as in Jimi’s case. Buster will do anything to shut down any sensible reasoning so he can come up trumps with his bogus murder hoax. We’ve got to cut him off at every opportunity.
Hi Ivana,
Exactly, and that’s why he is trying so hard to have us censored. Buster added more new bogus claims today which are total joke. His disinformation continues but his asinine claims get worse.
Crompton is wrong…I tried to contact Dr Crompton by phone and got his answering machine…I think he was in his eighties when I contacted him and did not respond…
What this goes by that Jason has failed to answer with his dishonest, regressive pseudo references is 9 Vesparax contains 1800mg of barbiturate…I made a mistake before…9 Vesparax does not contain 1800mg of Secobarbital as I have been posting…It contains 1350mg…The other 450mg is a second slow-release barbiturate called “Brallobarbitone”…So yes, Vesparax is particularly notorious probably because it hits you with a second round of depressant after the Secobarbital…It does this because the Secobarbital wears off after a period so they want a second drug to assure continuous sleep for the second part of the drug’s effect…
Because Jason is conspicuously moronic when it comes to abstract details he misses the fact that this 1350mg amount takes Jimi even further from the possibility of Lethal Dose because Lethal Dose for Secobarbital for person with no tolerance is still 2000mg and that is a firm scientific fact that Jason can’t get around…Because the Brallobarbitone is a slower time-released barbiturate its affect towards overdose does not come in to play during the applicable forensic times that apply to Jimi…Jimi only had the Vesparax in him for 1 to 2 hours max according to the real evidence we discovered through Monika’s lies…Before Dr Crompton got corrupted and brought in on the cover-up the most important forensic determination he made was that Jimi died no later than 5:30am…This was uncannily accurate and was also critical to determining the correct drug forensics…So the real barbiturate forensics involve only 1350mg of Secobarbital and 450mg of Brallobarbitone that had no applicable forensic effect during the pertinent forensic time period for overdose…What this proves is that Jimi dying and vomiting profusely only 1 to 2 hours in to a 9 tablet Vesparax dose could not be due to the Secobarbital and Brallobarbitone because we don’t have nearly the amounts needed to accomplish that…Nor was the intense vomiting a symptom of any real Vesparax overdose…In fact the case study of Vesparax overdoses, that showed no one taking 1 to 6 more tablets than Jimi took (10 to 15) died in less than 4 hours, shows that those barbiturates do not obtain lethality until a much longer period than Jimi underwent…
Jason says I am making these figures up but if anyone cares to notice he offers nothing to prove otherwise that is based on credible scientific reference…Contrary to Jason’s idiotic trolling, my figures are dead accurate and based on credible medical science, which is why no one (including Jason) has managed to put a scratch on them in the full decade I have been posting them…The bottom line is once you eliminate the false excuse of a Vesparax overdose there is no reason for Jimi to die the way he did other than being drowned in the 5 bottles of wine the attending physician Dr Bannister witnessed…When a person is subjected to that bodily insult the body reacts with intense vomiting as was seen at the death scene…
If I had spoken to Dr Crompton I would have asked him how a dose that the manufacturer itself said required a 10th tablet for persons with no tolerance could have produced liver levels that Jimi could not have survived?…I also would have asked him why Jimi would be worried about fatal liver levels if Dr Crompton himself said Jimi was already dead from fluid drowning his lungs like he told Kathy Etchingham?…Plus I would have discussed what I wrote above…This violation of forensic science is pure evidence that Crompton was brought in on a cover-up…
Jason has ignored and failed to answer this information for several months now and keeps re-entering regressive, already-disproven arguments…In any credibly moderated debate he would not be allowed to do that and would be stopped from further bogus debate…
This is just pathetic. Same repeated crap. The denials, the obfuscation, new bogus claims and changing stories, whining for me to be censored, the pretending this joker “Buster” is a medical expert knowing more than Dr. Rufus Crompton.
Dr. Crompton is not wrong. All he did was read Jimi’s autopsy report that was handed to him by Kathy Etchingham. Crompton read the report and told Kathy what was documented on it. All the documented forensic evidence was on that report since 1970. That evidence proved Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed his liver. No amount of denials from this hoaxer will change that.
Jimi took a massive dose all at once and this “wearing off” claim is as bogus as the alias names Brian Doyle aka “Buster” uses. He used his phony “forensic” hoax for a decade and it’s been thoroughly destroyed. It’s only his words with what he claims and it’s defeated by real forensic evidence of Jimi’s body. Buster can keep trying hard to add new fake phony stories but they will always lose to the evidence. His fake “cover up” claim is a joke only designed to deny the evidence that refutes him. There was never any “5 bottles of wine” that is made up by this hoaxer Brian Doyle aka Buster. We all know that to be a fact since no wine ever was documented.
9 Vesparax pills produced a toxic and lethal level 0.7mg in Jimi’s body going above the 0.5mg lethal level. The 9 pills Jimi took went above the lethal level and this moron hoaxer Buster says Jimi could have taken a 10th plus more. That’s why nobody takes a fraud like this seriously.
Something is definitely wrong with this guy who continues to make up new bogus claims after he’s already been debunked claiming there “hasn’t been a scratch” put on his bogus claims. His bogus claims has been incinerated but he can only recycle his same hoaxing disinformation pretending he knows more than famous renowned doctors. Brian Doyle aka Buster is a clown. All the real documented forensic evidence below refutes him. I’ve answered and destroyed all his bogus claims. He has no real evidence he can ever produce. It’s only his phony claims. Here is the real forensic evidence that destroys Buster aka Brian Doyle’s hoax.
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: The barbiturate level in Hendrix’s blood, 0.7 mg/100 ml was above the toxic level of 0.5 mg/100 ml.
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: “Jimi would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it.”
Associated Press 9/28/70: Prof. Donald Teare, a pathologist, said Mr. Hendrix, who was 27 years old, had died as a result of having swallowed vomit caused by barbiturate poisoning.
From the book: “Hendrix London” by William Saunders: The pathologist, Professor Donald Teare, gave the cause of Jimi’s death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate poisoning.
Why would an established and experienced forensic scientist need to answer your questions Buster? What exactly do you have to offer in terms of real proof and/or research? It’s already been done and nothing you add or say will change the original findings because they are pretty conclusive. Jimi died the way he did because he took way more of the Vesparax than the safe recommend level for that particular drug. There was no wine involved so stop pushing this nonsense in order to prove that Jimi was murdered by waterboarding. You’re not doing yourself any favours by continuing with this hoax it’s just a shallow and hallow attempt at getting and drawing attention to yourself. Move on Buster, Jason and I have it covered.
I was curious about Judy Wong the first person Monika rang asking for help. Judy died in 2005 after a massive heart attack, having had heart problems for years, in her apartment apparently she was found one week later. She was married for some time to a member of Jethro Tull. Alvenia Bridges who was staying with Eric Burdon when Monika made her second call, had been in the music industry working for Rolling Stone magazine. Eric Burdon and Alvenia were the first on the scene that morning at the Samarkand and Eric recalls seeing Jimi lying on the bed presumably dead. All three deserted the hotel room as the ambulance officers reported seeing no-one just Jimi on top of the bed dead fully clothed covered in vomit and not wine.
Judy did office work for Fleetwood Mac in the late 60’s and early 70’s and was an associate of Jimi’s and other famous musicians. Not any of the people closest to Jimi ever talked about imaginary wine or a phony murder. It was just a couple of wannabe’s who wrote books for money decades later making false claims that proved them to be liars.
Jimi was friends with a lot of the top musicians at the time, some who are still alive today, and none of them believed the fake claims of wine and “murder”. In fact, they laugh at those false stories just like Kathy Etchingham does.
If there was any truth to those bogus claims, it would have been leaked back in the 70’s and all these musicians would have known as word gets around. It wasn’t until Fraud Bannister made his phony claims of wine in January of 1992 when all this nonsense started.
Fraud Bannister and all hoaxers can celebrate the anniversary of the phony invented wine claims that started this hoax.
Don’t party too hard drinking red wine “Buster”.
BUSTER says: Jason tries to get around this by entering semantics instead of honest argument…He works backwards from 1 pill and claims that anyone who took more than 1 pill was taking a (semantic) “overdose”…But that isn’t how competent science works out in the real world of non-trolling adults…Anyone can see Jason rushing to deliberately undetailed trolling blather in order to avoid the fact he’s obviously unable to deal with or credibly answer the FACT 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate and that Jimi needed much more than that to reach Lethal Dose…The reason the real world adults who determined Lethal Dose for Vesparax go right to “9 or 10 tablets” is because that is the amount that people need to know…But the reason Monika’s doctors said Jimi would not have died from Monika’s pills is because they went even further in to the specific particulars I am mentioning that Jason is obviously desperately trying to avoid with moronic trolling that never answers the facts and seeks to pawn-off bad conclusions hidden in stupid generalities…
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: The barbiturate level in Hendrix’s blood, 0.7 mg/100 ml was above the toxic level of 0.5 mg/100 ml.
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: “Jimi would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it.”
Associated Press 9/28/70: Prof. Donald Teare, a pathologist, said Mr. Hendrix, who was 27 years old, had died as a result of having swallowed vomit caused by barbiturate poisoning.
From the book: “Hendrix London” by William Saunders: The pathologist, Professor Donald Teare, gave the cause of Jimi’s death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate poisoning.
Associated Press 9/30/70: During the autopsy of guitarist and musician Jimi Hendrix, hydroxyzines were found in his stomach, and barbiturates and amphetamines were found in his blood.”
“Drug overdoses severely impaired his musical ability; at a show in 1970, for example, he had to step down from the stage after only three songs due to a sedative overdose.
Kathy Etchingham: The amount of pills Jimi took was lethal.
Kathy Etchingham: Jimi died from a drug overdose.
JASON says: Buster continues his deliberate hoaxing scam but ends up easily refuted as always. Buster rants and raves how “Jimi couldn’t have died from 9 Vesparax pills” claiming it isn’t enough mg to overdose, but the forensic results of Jimi’s autopsy prove the dose Jimi took was lethal cuz it was 0.7 above the 0.5 toxic level. So, this hoaxing turd “Buster” lies saying Jimi didn’t have enough pills and mg’s to have a lethal overdose. Well, the forensic numbers prove Jimi was over the lethal level which is why he died. Dr. Crompton confirmed it was an overdose to Kathy Etchingham.
Buster makes bogus claims about the 1800mg total he was wrong about as he has no understanding that mixing uppers, downers, and alcohol contributes to an overdose.
Being the hypocrite that he is, Buster turns again to Monika Dannemann of all people so he can use her lying stories for his hoax. Here Jimi already died of a lethal overdose and Buster wants to use Monika’s doctors saying he couldn’t. This nonsense is what “Buster” uses for his “evidence”, which is only ridiculous after the fact claims trying to say an OD victim didn’t OD when it already happened. Monika is already on the record saying her doctors told her this medicine was super potent and only to take 1/2 pill. Jimi took 9 pills and Buster the hoaxer says Jimi could swallow a dozen more with no effects or death cuz he had a “famous tolerance”. Complete and total nonsense.
Buster has no clue what he is talking about. Going over the recommended dosage is an overdose. Anytime a person takes more than the prescribed amount that is an overdose.
No doctor is going to tell a person, “Hey take 9, 10, 15 , 20 pills. You have a famous tolerance to drugs, you haven’t met your threshold yet, you can’t die from it.”
Tobacco companies told people for years that smoking isn’t dangerous and can’t kill you and Buster the clown believes that Vesparax manufacturers are going to be honest about their product not being dangerous when going way over the prescribed amount. Vesparax was dangerous and why it was pulled.
Dr. Rufus Crompton confirmed Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed his liver. Dr. Teare did the autopsy and discovered those results. Those results will always refute hoaxing claims.
The Associated Press reported in major newspapers across the country in 1970 of Jimi’s lethal overdose confirming the barbiturate poisoning as told by Dr. Teare.
William Saunders and Kathy Etchingham both published these results in their books.
The Associated Press reported the drugs found in Jimi’s system and wrote about his previous overdoses. Jimi took less pills and overdosed on Mandrax and overdosed on normal sedatives unable to perform in concert. This proves Jimi did not have a “famous tolerance to drugs” cuz he could not even tolerate Mandrax and sedatives. The 9 Vesparax pills Jimi took showed that his liver was above the toxic limit and would have died from this dose if he hadn’t of suffocated on his vomit from the overdose. So, yes this dose was lethal cuz the forensic analysis of Jimi’s liver proved it. Trying to deny it with bogus claims will never change the actual documented evidence of this lethal confirmed overdose of Jimi Hendrix.
If this “debate” were fairly refereed Jason still hasn’t answered the critical facts in his blustering reply…Although he pads his replies in the language of indignant protest if you keep score on the credible facts and who is making an attempt to answer them Jason is using bluster to avoid answering facts and information he can’t answer…What Jason is doing here is repeating the false claim that .7mg/100ml was a fatal blood level…It wasn’t and that’s why Monika’s doctors said Jimi would not have died from her pills…If you pay attention to Jason responses and keep him honest, by the time he is done with his reply you can see he hasn’t answered the serious evidence like Dr Crompton saying Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…Jason runs from that point in public and how it obviates any need for discussion of barbiturate blood levels…Jason avoids giving any direct answer to the fact that the product manufacturer listed “9 or 10 tablets” as Lethal Dose…So since Jimi took 9 tablets that means .5mg/100ml cannot be a lethal blood level since 9 pills wasn’t enough to cause a lethal level by the manufacturer’s own words…Jason makes no attempt what so ever to answer the FACT that Vesparax only contains 1350mg of Secobarbital and that firm medical science requires 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…I spoke to medical consultants and they told me that the high levels in the liver were caused by the liver trying to cleanse the body of the offending substance…The doctor I spoke to said depending on where the sample was taken from the liver the sample could have been gotten from a place where the liver had concentrated the barbiturate in its attempt to get it out of the body…Jason is evading the point that was made and refusing to answer how a dose that the manufacturer said needed a 10th pill to reach Lethal Dose in a person with no tolerance could have caused lethal barbiturate levels in the liver?…You can’t have lethal levels in the liver if the victim didn’t take enough barbiturate to cause those levels and you can see Jason ignoring that point because he knows he can’t answer it…
In his two trolling replies Jason has failed to answer the basic point…Any intelligent person can see Jason making a trolling effort to get around that point in his misquotes and false references…9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg total barbiturate…1350mg of that is Secobarbital and 450mg is Brallobarbitone…The latter is a slow-release barbiturate that doesn’t come in to play until later in the ingestion process…It is medical fact, that Jason has yet to credibly answer, that a person with no tolerance requires 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…Jimi had a notorious tolerance that was witnessed and attested to by his friends…He needed at least 3000mg or more to reach Lethal Dose so therefore he was nowhere near fatal dose when he took 9 pills…Jason also totally ignores the time axis in this barbiturate science…He does that because he knows it refutes him and he can’t answer it…Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 to 2 hours and persons who took 10 to 15 pills were recorded as never dying in less than 4 hours…Jimi only took 9…This science proves why Jimi could not have overdosed and Jason still hasn’t credibly answered it…Jason’s quotation of Dr Crompton’s citation of the .7mg blood level doesn’t answer the fact that 9 Vesparax can’t produce lethal levels by the manufacturer’s own indication…
Jason is obviously desperate to fish misquotes from dubious sources who were involved in a cover-up when they made those statements…However if we slow it down and investigate those quotes more carefully we will see that .5mg “toxic” means nothing and is just like saying drinking a six pack of beer is “toxic”…The true context of those quotes from Crompton is they came after he had said too much and was trying to compensate by covering-up…He was trying too hard to make a non-lethal blood level lethal and it is evidence of the cover-up…As is Jason’s quoting of second-hand media sources saying Jimi died of barbiturate “poisoning”…Jason has already been told that nowhere did any official legal/medical document say Jimi died of lethal barbiturate poisoning…Those autopsy sheets clearly said “Intoxication” in order to make clear Jimi did not have a fatal “poisoning” level that was indicated by the nomenclature…The fact Jason dishonestly re-enters this inadequate, deficient level of regressive argument in the face of correct facts he refuses to answer means we win the debate by any credible standard…At this point Jason would be banned from further participation in any credibly-moderated debate…Crompton’s clear context is “If Jimi wasn’t murdered by being drowned in wine those high levels would have killed him” – but even that isn’t true…
Jason’s trolling style tries to make his BS filibuster the going standard in the debate but the truth is Jason is uncredibly ignoring that we proved Dr Siefert was lying and Dr Bannister was telling the truth…Being the truth-teller we can conclude Dr Bannister witnessed 5 bottles of wine drowning Jimi and that the government authorities committed a criminal cover-up…
Same bullshit from this hoaxing troll.
Deny the forensic analysis of Jimi’s body that proved a lethal overdose, add his fake alternate account of he wants it to be, use the phony wine claim from Bannister, then claim a “cover up” when this clown can’t produce evidence. This is all he does.
The forensic analysis of Jimi’s body produced lethal toxic numbers 0.7 that was above the 0.5 toxic level from 9 pills. These are irrefutable forensic numbers from Jimi’s body that can’t be argued against.
Dr. Crompton read Jimi’s autopsy report and confirmed this to Kathy Etchingham.
Dr. Teare confirmed that Jimi Hendrix died from barbiturate poisoning. “Buster” makes up his bullshit claim that the Associated Press reported “a second hand account” so he can smear this evidence. The toxic level of barbiturates that was in Jimi’s liver confirmed by forensic analysis proved the barbiturate poisoning.
These are the facts and the true forensic results that proved Jimi’s lethal overdose. We have a well known troll named “Buster” who lies making up his own fake claims providing no evidence and can only deny the evidence that destroys his hoax.
Buster pretends to be an expert but he constantly changes his fake claims for his hoax. That’s why he will always lose.
Buster is really good at smearing people’s reputations; he’s had a go at everyone with good intentions in this case. But he loves Bannister because he is the only one to corroborate the wine hoax. Would a murderer be making phone calls asking for help and then be standing across the street waiting for the ambulance to arrive? Would another murderer make a brief appearance in London carrying five bottles of wine and then be in Spain at the same time? We both know the answer.
The pills Jimi took caused him to choke on his own vomit. Monika’s doctors told her to take no more than half a tablet because of the strength of this particular drug. It’s then ridiculous to suggest that taking nine of these would not be classified as an overdose. The high dosage Jimi took not only knocked him out immediately but destroyed his liver in a short amount of time. In her statements Monika said she couldn’t wake Jimi up so he was either unconscious or dead after swallowing nine of her tablets not 10-15 but nine in total. It’s totally stupid to suggest that not following the manufacturers recommendations or the doctors advice when taking prescription medications will not cause major health problems. They clearly did in Jimi’s case because he didn’t have any signs of alcohol intoxication in his system or any evidence of wine being poured over him in large amounts.
BUSTER says” Give it up Jason…Only a nut would try to deny all this repeated evidence or say the witnesses were lying.
JASON says: Brian Doyle aka “Buster” is the nut who calls these same witnesses liars but he still uses their lying claims for his own hoax. This is why Brian Doyle aka “Buster” is a proven liar and a fraud. He calls these people liars but still uses their lies for the major parts of hoax. How can anybody believe “Buster” when he posts outright lies for his claims?
Buster is the same guy who calls renowned forensic pathologists and coroners liars and taking part in a “cover up” when the forensic evidence proves Jimi to have died from a lethal amount of barbiturates. Buster is a clown and a hypocrite who is not taken seriously by anybody.
Here we have “Buster” posting under his pseudonym “Ralph Yates” on Amazon attacking Sharon Lawrence giving her fiction book a 1 star review. He also defends the notorious liar Monika Dannemann in that review. Can you believe this guy?
Ralph Yates: This book is a disinformation work from a media insider who was close to Jimi Hendrix. It is even possible Sharon Lawrence was placed on Jimi Hendrix by US Intelligence as they were known to do. In it Lawrence makes the absurd suggestion that Jimi took 9 sleeping pills as a sort of magic russian roulette that would decide his fate by either killing him or not.
Lawrence exploits this confession for her disinformation purpose by trying to blame Monika. Meanwhile more credible researchers like myself realize that Sharon was friends with some other rock heavyweights who were involved but totally refrains from applying the same criticism she applies towards Monika to them. Persons like Eric Burdon, Gerry Stickells, Eric Barrett, Terry Slater, Alan Douglas, and others. So Sharon is definitely trying to scapegoat Monika as a patsy in order place blame on a dead person who can’t defend themselves.
Ms. Sharon Lawrence is a notorious individual who violently attacks anyone who tries to confront her on what she wrote in this book about Jimi’s death. She’s arrogant and will not speak about it at the threat of legal action. And this coming from a person who is caustically critical, in this same book, of others not defending Jimi and betraying him. Even worse I think Sharon has a good idea that there’s a lot more to Jimi’s death than she revealed. What people have to realize, including Sharon, is that Jimi’s murder is the central truth to his reality and that it will affect those who cover his life accordingly. Sharon makes the terrible mistake of thinking her attacking people by means of her Hendrix credentials will overcome this. In the end, when the truth comes out, Sharon will be made to heel to it and it won’t be merciful to the real betrayers who are not whom they currently seem to be.
JASON says: So, “Buster” posting under an another pseudonym “Ralph Yates” lets his true feelings be known attacking Sharon Lawrence and her book on Amazon as he defends the lying Monika Dannemann. Outrageous. He isn’t done yet cuz “Buster” also attacked Sharon Lawrence under his other well known pseudonym “Scrum Drum”.
Scrum Drum: Don’t trust Sharon. There’s something seriously wrong with her.
Scrum Drum: Sharon is a liar.
JASON says: So, Buster calls Sharon Lawrence a liar and tells us not to trust Sharon Lawrence under his alias Scrum Drum. But he uses her lying claim of Dr. Thurston telling a reporter that “Jimi’s stomach was full of wine” for his hoax on this site. Yes, we won’t trust Sharon or Buster and his many pseudonyms who peddle nothing but lies.
Don’t forget what he said about Monika Dannemann.
BUSTER: Monika is a notorious liar.
BUSTER: All of Monika’s lies.
Scrum Drum: Monika’s psycopathic tendencies.
JASON says: So, “Buster” calls these same witnesses liars all over the internet with his different alias names but then defends them and these same lies for his hoax on this site. Then he attacks me for calling out their lies on here when he already called these people liars before. Buster is in serious need of mental help.
This is why Buster is a fraud and a hoaxer. He uses outright lies for his claims and that’s what he calls “science and evidence” denying the real forensic evidence and science that refutes him.
BUSTER says: Give it up Jason…Only a nut would try to deny all this repeated evidence or say the witnesses were lying.
Scrum Drum: Don’t trust Sharon. There’s something seriously wrong with her.
Scrum Drum: Sharon is a liar.
BUSTER: Monika is a notorious liar.
BUSTER: All of Monika’s lies.
Scrum Drum: Monika’s psycopathic tendencies.
JASON says: “Buster” is the true nut who calls witnesses liars but still uses their lies for the major parts of his hoax.
Brian Doyle aka Buster aka Scrum Drum aka Ralph Yates is just a hoaxing internet troll who uses fake names to peddle lies and is not taken seriously anywhere.
The trick Jason is trying to get away with above is ending up with fatal levels of barbiturate as an output even though I have proven Jimi did not input a fatal level in the number of pills he took…Jason and his dishonest wording are deliberately avoiding answering this and are trying to force the .7mg/100ml as a fatal amount when it isn’t…You can’t input 9 pills, that the manufacturer admits isn’t a fatal amount when it listed a 10th pill as being necessary for a Lethal Dose, and end up with a fatal amount…Jason ignores the part where 9 Vesparax contains only 1350mg of Secobarbital and tries to answer it with the .7mg level, but you can’t get away with that because the science is firm that 2000mg of barbiturate is necessary to reach Lethal Dose in a person with no tolerance…If you read Jason’s answer above he once again totally ignores Jimi’s famous tolerance and how it would have taken 3000mg or more of barbiturate for Jimi to reach Lethal Dose…There’s an important thing Jason is trying to get away with by always trying to reduce the debate to his oversimplified terms…He’s trying to phrase the argument in order to ignore the barbiturate science I am citing here of 2000mg being necessary to reach Lethal Dose in a person with no tolerance…If anyone is reading this please pay attention to the fact that every time Jason responds he refuses to answer the 2000mg requirement, Jimi’s tolerance, and the time axis where Jimi didn’t have nearly enough time to overdose…Jason achieves this by aggressive trolling and name-calling but he never answers these points because he knows they refute him…The .7mg doesn’t get him out of it as he contends so Jason has failed to answer how an inadequate amount of Vesparax can produce a fatal dose on the far end…It can’t and Monika’s doctors would not have risked their reputations by ignoring a .7mg fatal dose if that amount were conclusive…Monika’s doctors saw that .7mg and determined it wasn’t fatal…There is even a quote out there where either Teare or Crompton also admitted that Jimi’s levels were dangerous but not fatal…
Jason is a liar and nowhere on Dr Teare’s autopsy report did he mention barbiturate “poisoning”…Jason regularly outright lies in these posts but gets away with it because the room is totally unmoderated…He would not get away with that in a moderated debate and would pay the correct price for it…This is important because Flyswatter proved that non-lethal amounts were always referred to as “Intoxication” and fatal amounts were referred to as “Poisoning”…Teare entered “Intoxication” on Jimi’s autopsy for the barbiturate which tells you right there they knew he had not ingested a fatal amount of barbiturate…Jason is a demented nut which is why he is saying I am Flyswatter…He’s only saying that to troll and disrupt…
Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi’s lungs were full of “fluid”…Crompton did not say “vomit” he said “fluid”…This is corroboration of Dr Bannister and also corroboration that the pills didn’t kill Jimi…That “fluid” had to have been vomited out at the Samarkand which proves the wine was witnessed by the ambulance men at the Samarkand…Dr Thurston told Jack Meehan that Jimi’s stomach was full of red wine…We are past the point of no return here for proving our case because the fluid Crompton told Kathy was flooding Jimi’s lungs was the same wine Dr Bannister witnessed despite Jason’s idiotic denials…And it was the same red wine Thurston told Meehan Jimi’s stomach was full of…Siefert is on video admitting Jimi was covered in that same wine…
Give it up Jason…Only a nut would try to deny all this repeated evidence or say the witnesses were lying…
Let’s go to arbitration on the .7mg level…It is not fatal as you contend…Crompton had been pulled in to the cover-up by the time of that quote and was trying to get out of everything I’ve typed here…
A deluded fool living in a fantasy land with only your numerous pseudonyms as company. Give it up Buster both Jason and I are fully aware of what the truth is. We have Drs. Teare, Crompton,Thurston and Kathy by our side.
Real forensic analysis of Jimi’s body proved he died from a lethal amount of barbiturates cuz the toxic level in his body proved it.
This is documented forensic evidence that cannot be refuted.
All Buster can do is argue against the documented forensic evidence claiming it wasn’t lethal and he has no real evidence except his phony claims. That’s why his claims will always be a loser.
Everything Buster uses is after the fact claims that he uses for his hoax to suppress the real evidence.
No wine was ever detected or documented anywhere on any report or inside or on the body of Jimi Hendrix. But he wants to still make claims of phony wine with no documents to prove.
You can’t prove anything without solid documented evidence. Buster has none.
Documented forensic evidence of Jimi’s autopsy report proves he died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that registered a 0.7 reading that was above the 0.5 toxic level and this troll “Buster” can only pathetically claim it isn’t lethal.
Forensic analysis and science cannot be argued against with fake alternate claims and denials that this hoaxer “Buster” hilariously tries to pass off for his “evidence”.
As if the truth of what happened to Jimi isn’t bad enough Buster’s got to invent an even more gruesome scenario. I think it takes a particular mindset to come up with this alternative stuff.
BUSTER says: The trick Jason is trying to get away with above is ending up with fatal levels of barbiturate as an output even though I have proven Jimi did not input a fatal level in the number of pills he took…Jason and his dishonest wording are deliberately avoiding answering this and are trying to force the .7mg/100ml as a fatal amount when it isn’t…You can’t input 9 pills, that the manufacturer admits isn’t a fatal amount when it listed a 10th pill as being necessary for a Lethal Dose, and end up with a fatal amount…Jason ignores the part where 9 Vesparax contains only 1350mg of Secobarbital and tries to answer it with the .7mg level, but you can’t get away with that because the science is firm that 2000mg of barbiturate is necessary to reach Lethal Dose in a person with no tolerance…If you read Jason’s answer above he once again totally ignores Jimi’s famous tolerance and how it would have taken 3000mg or more of barbiturate for Jimi to reach Lethal Dose…There’s an important thing Jason is trying to get away with by always trying to reduce the debate to his oversimplified terms…He’s trying to phrase the argument in order to ignore the barbiturate science I am citing here of 2000mg being necessary to reach Lethal Dose in a person with no tolerance…If anyone is reading this please pay attention to the fact that every time Jason responds he refuses to answer the 2000mg requirement, Jimi’s tolerance, and the time axis where Jimi didn’t have nearly enough time to overdose…Jason achieves this by aggressive trolling and name-calling but he never answers these points because he knows they refute him…The .7mg doesn’t get him out of it as he contends so Jason has failed to answer how an inadequate amount of Vesparax can produce a fatal dose on the far end…It can’t and Monika’s doctors would not have risked their reputations by ignoring a .7mg fatal dose if that amount were conclusive…Monika’s doctors saw that .7mg and determined it wasn’t fatal…There is even a quote out there where either Teare or Crompton also admitted that Jimi’s levels were dangerous but not fatal…
JASON says: There’s nothing in Buster’s long winded written mess that amounts to anything credible or can be stated as scientific. This is nothing but made up bogus claims which amounts to nothing. Buster can whine about mg numbers for the rest of his life. The 0.7mg toxic level of the 9 barbiturates in Jimi’s system was lethal resulting in barbiturate poisoning and can never be refuted. Buster making up and changing fake mg
numbers is pathetic and hilarious. The forensic analysis of Jimi’s body already proved the 9 Vesparax pills along with the black bomber amphetamine and the wine Jimi drank to be lethal. The results are written in stone forever in the forensic analysis in Jimi’s autopsy.
Dr. Crompton confirmed Jimi’s level was fatal as so did Dr. Teare who confirmed Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning in 1970. Buster is a fraudulent liar and posts outright lies which is why he is banned from every Jimi Hendrix site and forum.
Here is the documented forensic evidence that will always defeat this troll:
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: The barbiturate level in Hendrix’s blood, 0.7 mg/100 ml was above the toxic level of 0.5 mg/100 ml.
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: “Jimi would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it.”
Associated Press 9/28/70: Prof. Donald Teare, a pathologist, said Mr. Hendrix, who was 27 years old, had died as a result of having swallowed vomit caused by barbiturate poisoning.
From the book: “Hendrix London” by William Saunders: The pathologist, Professor Donald Teare, gave the cause of Jimi’s death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate poisoning.
Associated Press 9/30/70: During the autopsy of guitarist and musician Jimi Hendrix, hydroxyzines were found in his stomach, and barbiturates and amphetamines were found in his blood.”
“Drug overdoses severely impaired his musical ability; at a show in 1970, for example, he had to step down from the stage after only three songs due to a sedative overdose.
Kathy Etchingham: The amount of pills Jimi took was lethal.
Kathy Etchingham: Jimi died from a drug overdose.
BUSTER says: Jason is a liar and nowhere on Dr Teare’s autopsy report did he mention barbiturate “poisoning”…Jason regularly outright lies in these posts but gets away with it because the room is totally unmoderated…He would not get away with that in a moderated debate and would pay the correct price for it…This is important because Flyswatter proved that non-lethal amounts were always referred to as “Intoxication” and fatal amounts were referred to as “Poisoning”…Teare entered “Intoxication” on Jimi’s autopsy for the barbiturate which tells you right there they knew he had not ingested a fatal amount of barbiturate…Jason is a demented nut which is why he is saying I am Flyswatter…He’s only saying that to troll and disrupt…
JASON says: Buster has been banned from every Hendrix site for trolling and posting blatant lies for his hoax. Buster’s other alias is “Flyswatter” cuz the moderator at another forum said he was where he was posting with his “Flyswatter” alias. Same exact writing style and bogus claims are a dead giveaway of that. Just like his “Albert Doyle”, “Ralph Yates”, “jetblast”, “Scrum Drum”, “David”, “J Stevenson”, etc. fake alias names he uses for his hoax.
Buster is ignorant of science, medicine, and the human body. The toxic level of barbiturates in Jimi’s system was lethal at 0.7mg which is barbiturate poisoning over the 0.5mg toxic level. Any lethal amount of drugs is barbiturate poisoning. Buster the troll ignores documented evidence that proves the barbiturate poisoning in Jimi’s body.
Associated Press 9/28/70: Prof. Donald Teare, a pathologist, said Mr. Hendrix, who was 27 years old, had died as a result of having swallowed vomit caused by barbiturate poisoning.
From the book: “Hendrix London” by William Saunders: The pathologist, Professor Donald Teare, gave the cause of Jimi’s death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate poisoning.
JASON says: Confirmed by Dr. Teare by the Associated Press was barbiturate poisoning for Jimi Hendrix and it was also published in William Saunders book Hendrix London. This is documented evidence that refutes Buster the clown proving him once again to be the liar.
BUSTER says: Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi’s lungs were full of “fluid”…Crompton did not say “vomit” he said “fluid”…This is corroboration of Dr Bannister and also corroboration that the pills didn’t kill Jimi…That “fluid” had to have been vomited out at the Samarkand which proves the wine was witnessed by the ambulance men at the Samarkand…Dr Thurston told Jack Meehan that Jimi’s stomach was full of red wine…We are past the point of no return here for proving our case because the fluid Crompton told Kathy was flooding Jimi’s lungs was the same wine Dr Bannister witnessed despite Jason’s idiotic denials…And it was the same red wine Thurston told Meehan Jimi’s stomach was full of…Siefert is on video admitting Jimi was covered in that same wine…
JASON says: This is nothing but made up lies and bogus claims that Buster uses for his hoax. All of this garbage has already been thoroughly been debunked. Wine witnessed by the ambulance men? Bullshit. They never said one word about wine in their testimony. Dr. Thurston never said a damn word about wine. Sharon Lawrence made that lie up in her fiction book. Where is Fraud Bannister’s documented hospital reports on wine? He has none cuz there wasn’t any wine. Fluid is not wine which proves there was never any phony wine removal. No wine was ever forensically analyzed on or inside Jimi Hendrix. All you do is repeat your same debunked bogus lies. This is why you are banned from every Hendrix site and forum. What you post is a total joke.
This documented forensic evidence will always defeat your bogus hoax:
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: The barbiturate level in Hendrix’s blood, 0.7 mg/100 ml was above the toxic level of 0.5 mg/100 ml.
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: “Jimi would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it.”
Associated Press 9/28/70: Prof. Donald Teare, a pathologist, said Mr. Hendrix, who was 27 years old, had died as a result of having swallowed vomit caused by barbiturate poisoning.
From the book: “Hendrix London” by William Saunders: The pathologist, Professor Donald Teare, gave the cause of Jimi’s death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate poisoning.
Associated Press 9/30/70: During the autopsy of guitarist and musician Jimi Hendrix, hydroxyzines were found in his stomach, and barbiturates and amphetamines were found in his blood.”
“Drug overdoses severely impaired his musical ability; at a show in 1970, for example, he had to step down from the stage after only three songs due to a sedative overdose.
Kathy Etchingham: The amount of pills Jimi took was lethal.
Kathy Etchingham: Jimi died from a drug overdose.
We will see another long winded rant from “Buster” about phony mg numbers that Buster believes Jimi can tolerate based on only Buster’s own bogus phony claims. That is hilarious.
Buster can post these fake numbers all he wants. The real forensic science in Jimi’s autopsy returned a 0.7mg reading that is above the 0.5mg toxic level.
Jimi took 9 Vesparax pills and the 0.7 toxic level reading was well above the 0.5 base toxic level.
This forensic documented evidence proves that “Buster” is full of shit. Buster is still sniveling about phony “tolerance claims” and fake mg numbers he makes up claiming Jimi can still tolerate. Forensic medical science defeats his fake claims.
It was proven medically by forensic analysis and the rejection of the 9 Vesparax pills in Jimi’s body that Jimi could not tolerate the 9 Vesparax pills he swallowed that morning.
No troll can ever refute what medical science discovered in Jimi’s body. Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed his liver causing barbiturate poisoning. This is set in stone forever.
Hi Jason, Buster has just got to hold on to his fake story no matter what. Everyone is covering up something in his world and only Buster is the honest one. No reputable forensic scientist would ever think of filling out a dodgy report of their findings. Dr. Thurston reiterated Dr.Teare’s findings as did Dr. Crompton as they saw no reason to question it. If there was any doubt about what caused Jimi’s death then there would have been a further investigation.
Jason is making my argument for me even though he is too dumb/trollish to realize it…If 9 tablets created the .7mg level Teare recorded then the .5 “base level” would have to be made by 6.5 tablets and therefore not be close to the “9 or 10 tablets” the manufacturer listed for Lethal Dose…So while trolling Jason is trying to say the .5mg level was “toxic” he is avoiding honestly admitting his own entry disproves it…What counts the most is there is a quote out there of either Crompton or Teare saying the .7mg reading was dangerous but not lethal…It is obvious that Jason is over his head and hoping the figures he is misquoting prove overdose but any sensible person who reads the medical evidence I am posting would know otherwise…Monika’s doctors would not risk discrediting themselves by saying the .7mg reading wasn’t fatal if it was…Jason is desperately grasping at the .7mg reading because he’s trying to avoid the firm barbiturate science of 2000mg being needed for overdose in a person with no tolerance…Jason is only mocking himself if he says I am making this stuff up because any glance at barbiturate science will see the 2000mg amount is written in stone as the amount needed for overdose in persons with no tolerance…Jimi had a notorious tolerance that was repeatedly mentioned by his friends so the science for barbiturate tolerance is also easily accessible and shows a person like Jimi would need at least 3000mg to reach Lethal Dose…The reason Teare went back and tweaked the barbiturate reading for the cover-up was because he knew the .7mg level wasn’t enough for overdose…
All Jason offers is trash talk and he never references any scientific sources…The wine filling Jimi’s stomach that Dr Thurston told Meehan about was the same “fluid” that Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham was filling Jimi’s lungs…That fluid was the wine Dr Bannister removed from Jimi and spoke of in many articles…That wine was the same wine Dr Siefert told David Kramer was covering Jimi in a video interview…It is also the same wine Monika told Sharon Lawrence she poured on Jimi…The repeated witnessing of the wine is undeniable but that doesn’t phase Jason who asks us to believe him when he calls every single source for those witnessings liars or people hoaxing for monetary gain…
The fluid that Dr Crompton said was filling Jimi’s lungs and keeping him from breathing was the same wine Dr Bannister witnessed and removed…The correct context of Crompton’s attempt to cover-up is: “Yes Jimi was murdered by being drowned in wine and that was the fluid that filled his lungs, but the pills would have killed him anyway”…Even that wasn’t true because 9 Vesparax was not enough to kill a person with Jimi’s tolerance let alone in only 1 or 2 two hours…
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is on call writing a 50 year old prescription for Jimi Hendrix who he says can tolerate 1800mg but quickly changes it to 2000mg for his hoax but then dials it up to 3000mg after working hard in his laboratory to get the correct mg.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is not being a credible doctor cuz Jimi with his famous tolerance to drugs could surely withstand 5000mg with no problem. Expect an increase of dosage coming from Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates in the near future regarding Mr. Hendrix.
Jimi overdosed on 5 Mandrax and couldn’t perform on stage with 3 sedatives and died from barbiturate poisoning on 9 Vesparax. But Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates who graduated from Hoaxers University and later from The Three Stooges School of Medicine, says Jimi could jam with 3000mg with no sweat. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates now has Jimi Hendrix being able to swallow 18-20 pills in once crack when he couldn’t even take 9. This might be a case for medical malpractice folks!
Hopefully Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates won’t lose his medical license for fraud like his old pal Fraud Bannister or else they might be involved in a cover up. Dr. Buster Yates does try to cover up the real evidence with his fake claims of wine but is always refuted everywhere he trolls on the internet.
We can’t get away from the phony wine claims from Dr Albert Doyle Buster Yates who does not offer one single piece of real documented evidence to prove. It’s only his words of fake claims coming from his cast of witness characters that he even calls liars. How can we take this “good doctor” Yates seriously, when he uses blatant liars as sources that even he has called out as liars himself? That’s why Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is just an internet troll and is not taken seriously. Here he is, Buster aka Scrum Drum posting under his alias names calling his own witnesses as liars.
Buster: Monika is a liar
Scrum Drum: Sharon is a liar.
Scrum Drum: Don’t trust Sharon. There’s something seriously wrong with her.
Buster: Siefert is lying.
So, Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates says his witnesses are liars but still uses their lies anyway for his hoax. What kind of a nut does that? Brian Doyle aka Buster aka Flyswatter aka Scrum Drum aka Albert Doyle aka Ralph Yates that’s who.
Buster is a long time internet troll who makes up fake stories and uses many fake alias names to push his phony murder hoax based on liars he uses for his hoax as he now pretends to be a doctor writing prescriptions for Jimi Hendrix.
I have a real problem with Monika admitting she poured wine on Jimi; who admits to something like that when the potential outcome would be unintentionally killing someone. I don’t think this conversation ever took place. Holding Jimi down so you can pour pills and wine into him without a struggle is just ridiculous. For one thing Jimi wouldn’t have been able to swallow any of it with that amount of pills and wine; it would have splattered everywhere, and who exactly held Jimi down while the wine was supposedly poured into him if it was only Monika and Michael Jeffrey. You really think Jimi would not have put up a fight and run out of that place. It’s pretty obvious Jimi took the pills willingly and by choice and not had them rammed down his throat. The fluid that accumulated in Jimi’s lungs was a consequence of the overdose and not the presence of wine. Dr. Teare found nothing to suggest that Jimi was a victim of violence as this was ruled out early during the autopsy, and the ambulance officers both said it looked like an overdose of which that saw many. There would have been absolutely no reason why the forensic scientists would have backed down after their initial findings as this would have meant a loss to their reputations and professionalism.
Consider the source who this is coming from, Sharon Lawrence, who made up multiple lies in her fiction book. Look at what Buster says posting as “Scrum Drum” about his hero Sharon Lawrence.
Scrum Drum: Sharon is a liar.
Scrum Drum: Don’t trust Sharon. There’s something seriously wrong with her.
JASON says: For once I agree with “Buster” aka “Scrum Drum”. Buster is just a troll and uses whatever lies and liars he can for his hoax.
Sharon Lawrence has no credibility and is a proven liar, so what she claims should be taken with a grain of salt.
There was no evidence of trauma that would result in the forcing of pills and wine. Buster has changed his phony claims on this many times. There is no record of wine anywhere. Which proves it doesn’t exist. Forensic analysis refutes all these fake claims.
BUSTER says: The trick Jason is trying to get away with above is ending up with fatal levels of barbiturate as an output even though I have proven Jimi did not input a fatal level in the number of pills he took…
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: The barbiturate level in Hendrix’s blood, 0.7 mg/100 ml was above the toxic level of 0.5 mg/100 ml.
Dr. Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School: “Jimi would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it.”
Associated Press 9/28/70: Prof. Donald Teare, a pathologist, said Mr. Hendrix, who was 27 years old, had died as a result of having swallowed vomit caused by barbiturate poisoning.
From the book: “Hendrix London” by William Saunders: The pathologist, Professor Donald Teare, gave the cause of Jimi’s death as inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate poisoning.
JASON says: The forensic analysis of Jimi’s body back in 1970 proved he died from a fatal 9 pill overdose. The top forensic pathologists confirmed it.
“Buster” has proven that he is a troll smearing real forensic evidence for his crap he makes up in his crazy head. Real forensic documentation exists to refute this troll right on the spot.
Buster fraudulently says that he’s “proven Jimi did not input a fatal level in the number of pills he took.”
Forensic analysis of Jimi’s body proves this troll wrong as does the top medical pathologists in the world.
Dr. Rufus Crompton confirmed the amount of 9 Vesparax pills Jimi took was fatal.
Dr. Teare confirmed the amount of 9 Vesparax pills Jimi took resulted in barbiturate poisoning cuz the 0.7mg barbiturate level was well above the 0.5mg toxic level. That clearly means there was barbiturate poisoning inside Jimi Hendrix causing him to die.
The Associated Press reported that Jimi Hendrix died from barbiturate poisoning confirmed to the press by Dr. Teare. William Saunders also confirmed Jimi’s barbiturate poisoning in his book.
Dr. Crompton also confirmed the reading of Jimi’s liver was too high to survive the 9 pill dose. This also confirms that Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning. The high reading in Jimi’s liver was from the poisoning of the 9 Vesparax pills. And this troll “Buster” claims “Jimi couldn’t have died from the 9 pills and needed more to die.”
The 0.7mg above toxic barbiturate level proved the 9 pill amount Jimi took was fatal. Forensic analysis proved it. The 0.7mg above lethal toxic reading proves the barbiturate poisoning cuz it is above the toxic level. This forensic analysis cannot be disputed. These are the stone cold facts.
What does “Buster” have to refute this medical science with? His own trolling words that “it didn’t happen” and his bogus claims “Jimi didn’t die from a lethal dose” as he makes up his own fake numbers fabricating what the pharmaceutical manufacturers said. Hilarious. “Buster’s” hoaxing words mean nothing. Medical science already proved in 1970 that Jimi did die from a lethal dose. And this documented forensic medical evidence proves it forever.
Dr. Albert Buster Yates is at it again with his forged medical license hanging high on the wall of his imaginary medical practice challenging the findings of the respected and experienced forensic team that examined Jimi’s body. It doesn’t matter who Dr. Yates mows down with his dubious numbers just as long as he wins hands down. Never take a prescription from this man as he’ll have you overdosing in no time. Remember the threshold isn’t 9 anymore it’s 10-15. LOL.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates also can picture his framed “Doctor of The Year Award” in his delusional mind along with his “World’s Greatest Forensic Pathologist” coffee mug that came with a free bonus T Shirt and balloon.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates will be in the medical history books for the most changes for the dosage of Jimi Hendrix’s barbiturates.
His speech will be warmly welcomed at The Three Stooges School of Medicine where he graduated. Fraud Bannister will be in attendance talking imaginary wine.
Jimi’s threshold will continue to increase as Dr Albert Doyle Buster Yates pumps up the dosage to 18-20 to claim Jimi’s even stronger tolerance. Dr. Buster Yates is still running away from the lethal 0.7mg toxic level that killed Jimi from 9 pills.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is reckless with the dosage with his prescriptions. He very well could be struck off the medical register for fraud and be sued for medical malpractice just like his old pal Fraud Bannister was. Haha
Priceless, Jason.
Jason can’t answer the fact 9 Vesparax only contains 1350mg of Secobarbital…The other 450mg is Brallobarbitone, which is a slow-release barbiturate designed to extend the sleeping period…The Brallobarbitone doesn’t have full effect in the 1 to 2 hour golden window for forensic effect that Jimi had the pills in him for so he provably didn’t reach the 2000mg overdose threshold…Jason can’t get around this so he mocks, ridicules, and trolls but also loses the debate because he failed to answer the correct evidence…Jason is trolling and lying when he says the .7mg level found in Jimi’s blood was lethal…There’s a quote out there from either Teare or Crompton saying the .7mg was dangerous but not fatal…Teare later adjusted the barbiturate upward because he was brought in on the cover-up and needed to skew the figures upward to suggest overdose…
As soon as Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi could not have been breathing when he arrived at Hospital because his lungs were full of fluid it was Crompton’s sworn medical duty to investigate that because Crompton knew that was not normal and needed explanation…It is quite obvious that Crompton had spoken to others about Jimi’s case before talking to Kathy…Since Dr Bannister was in Australia it was probably Dr Siefert that informed Crompton of the wine…But I do recall Bannister saying they were going to fly him to England for testimony but never did, so it may have been Bannister…In any case once Crompton was informed of the wine he had a duty to proactively investigate it, which included the nurses and Monika…Crompton was definitely part of the cover-up because his choice of the word “fluid” instead of wine meant he knew of the significance of the fluid being wine towards the cause of death and decided to conceal it by calling it fluid in order to avoid its forensic meaning…Crompton failed his duty as a forensic pathologist to then investigate how lungs full of wine could result in a trace blood alcohol content…The only possibility would be drowning in wine before the intestines could absorb the alcohol…
Dr Thurston had the same duty and failed…If Thurston had followed his required duty and pursued the stomach full of wine he was aware of, Crompton would have realized the fluid filling Jimi’s lungs was that same wine and quickly established forensic evidence of homicide…This is proof that not only was the original investigation corrupted but so was Kathy’s and the government was acting in opposition to its legal duty and public trust and was covering-up evidence of murder instead of exposing it…
Jason is trolling but he is also publicly failing to answer we have adequately proven that 1) Jimi did not have enough barbiturate or time to overdose and 2) That therefore the cause of death was something other than the Vesparax…3) Jason is in obnoxious, contemptuous denial that Dr Crompton confirming the lungs full of fluid to Kathy Etchingham is solid corroboration of the wine Dr Bannister witnessed and that it was confirmed by the medical authority of top credibility in England…
Give it up Jason…You’ve lost this badly and any sensible person of average intelligence can see you for the obnoxious troll you are…You’re a sick person who likes attacking terribly-victimized persons in favor of their evil murderers and their dark corruption…May karma seek and find you…May you burn in hell…
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates makes another adjustment on his prescription for Jimi Hendrix lowering the dosage to 2000mg, but he isn’t sure if Jimi reached his overdose threshold. What kind of a doctor is Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates when he isn’t even sure of his own bogus story he makes up?
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates told us last time that Jimi’s threshold was 3000mg but now he changes it to 2000mg. So, another story change from our hoaxing doctor who can’t keep his story straight. That’s a problem for him when he keeps making up and changing all these fake mg numbers, it’s hard for him to remember which fake dosage to administer for Jimi.
Our amazing doctor “Buster” who is a self proclaimed “forensic expert” proudly carries his Three Stooges medical license which he received when he joined The Three Stooges Fan Club that gives him the ability to practice medicine on Jimi Hendrix.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates must have not been paying attention to the lecture in class regarding toxic barbituate levels and must have been reading his Sharon Lawrence fiction book instead.
Jimi’s barbiturate level was above toxic at 0.7mg which caused barbiturate poisoning in his system from 9 Vesparax pills. Forensic analysis detected that lethal level inside Jimi Hendrix. Dr. Robert Donald Teare told the media that Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning which came from a lethal drug overdose and has never said anywhere that Jimi’s drug overdose was not lethal. Dr. Crompton has never said it wasn’t lethal either. 0.7mg is above lethal and no doctor would ever say 0.7mg is not lethal.
Dr. Teare never adjusted any numbers since the above toxic reading came from Hendrix’s body and his liver. There was never any “cover up” either as this troll just rants like a loon. This is just more blatant lies from our troll “Buster” who graduated from Hoaxers University trying to smear the real record for his bogus hoax.
“Buster” knows the real evidence refutes his phony “murder” hoax, so he has to make up blatant lies that Jimi’s overdose wasn’t lethal, like lying about Teare and Crompton with non existent quotes that they never said. And also, Buster making up his bogus cover up claims to discredit the real record when he is the only one making these fraudulent claims based on not a single shred of evidence but only his hoaxing words. This is why “Buster” is banned from every Jimi Hendrix site and forum pushing his hoax of blatant lies that he makes up in his crazy head.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is involved in a cover up. His job is to smear and cover up the real evidence for his bogus hoax as he’s been lying and hoaxing his scam on the internet for 11 years. Nothing this troll ever says is confirmed documented or real evidence. It’s always what he claims and what he says it to be. Well, what he says is full of shit and all the readers know it as well as anybody who ever conversed with this internet troll during his 11 year hoaxing reign.
All these bogus claims come only from “Buster” where he claims a “cover up” and thinks up mg numbers for his phony tolerance story as he tries to cover up the real evidence.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates was reading his Sharon Lawrence fiction book where she made up the bogus story of Dr. Thurston and the imaginary wine. Sharon Lawrence said Jimi Hendrix committed suicide with 9 pills so her fake Thurston story is a total contradiction and totally false.
Hydroxyzine was found in Jimi’s stomach during the autopsy and that comes from Vesparax and not wine. Vesparax contains Hydroxyzine, and not surprisingly, our phony doctor who pretends to be a “medical expert” did not know that. So, since drugs were found in Jimi’s stomach, that debunks the bogus “stomach full of wine” claims, cuz no wine was detected in the forensic analysis of Jimi’s stomach. This revelation also debunks Fraud Bannister who claimed to have been sucking wine from Jimi’s stomach. If Fraud Bannister was sucking out wine, then no Hydroxyzine should have been detected during the autopsy cuz it all would have been gone out of the stomach before the autopsy. But since Fraud Bannister lied and made the whole phony story up, the Hydroxyzine was detected cuz there was never any imaginary wine or phony wine removal.
Documented forensic science and analysis by the top pathologists in the world discovered that Jimi Hendrix died from barbiturate poisoning due to a lethal amount of 9 barbiturates that detected a 0.7mg reading which is above the toxic level. This evidence is set in stone forever and can never be refuted. 9 powerful Vesparax, a powerful amphetamine, plus being over the legal alcohol limit is enough to kill a man, and it killed Jimi Hendrix no matter what an internet troll with only claims tries to say.
Vesparax causes difficulty in breathing and Jimi did not take a normal dose of sleeping pills. He took an overdose of 9. Barbiturates also slows down the nervous system and Jimi also was over the legal alcohol limit. Barbiturates changes the heart rate as well. People who have bad hearts have trouble with fluid building up in their chest and lungs. Jimi’s autopsy showed that his heart was dilated from the overdose which caused fluid to build up in his chest. That is the result of a drug overdose, not a phony wine drowning. The forensic analysis of the fluid detected no wine at the autopsy and nothing about wine was ever documented. Yes, everything in a body is forensically analyzed during an autopsy, so the troll “Buster” can save himself from typing trying to claim that it wasn’t. Again, if Fraud Bannister was sucking wine out of Jimi then no fluid should be there cuz it should have all been removed before the autopsy. So, Hydroxyzine found in the stomach and fluid in the chest proves Fraud Bannister’s claim to be as fraudulent as he was as a doctor which is why he was struck off the medical register for life.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates should have flunked out of The Three Stooges School of Medicine cuz he has no clue about anything he was supposed to learn in school about medicine. His hoaxing degree from Hoaxers University has been put to good use over the years as he only can produce his own made up lies for his stories.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates has been dipping into the Vesaprax bottle one too many times with his last remark he made. Be careful doctor, those pills can be quite addictive and we can’t have you taking an overdose from your wacky mg numbers you assign and then quickly change for Jimi Hendrix.
Jimi was not a victim murdered by vengeful white people his life was full of fun as Chas Chandler pointed out. Making Jimi look like some tormented puppet being pulled left, right and centre by unscrupulous mangers is doing this creative, intelligent and well liked man a great disservice. Jimi does not come across as a weak and manipulated person, he had the courage and good sense to leave America to pursue his love of music and performing in England where he quickly found the following he sought. He then returned to America to perform at the Monterey Pop Festival at the request of Paul McCartney and was praised for his musical skills. The rest is history.
BUSTER says: Jason loses this debate because a person with a well known tolerance requires 3 or even 4 thousand milligrams of barbiturate to reach Lethal Dose…The stimulant in the amphetamine Jimi took would only work in Jimi’s favor…Jimi only had 1800mg of barbiturates in him from 9 Vesparax and in his particular case he safely needed 3 or 4000mg to reach Lethal Dose – and that would have taken 4 hours minimum to kill him if he had, according to case studies of Vesparax…Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 or 2 hours and Jason has uncredibly failed to account for this…These are the firm forensics Jason is failing to answer and his use of demented trolling to try to compensate only digs his grave deeper as far as this debate and personal credibility…Only a moron would try what Jason is trying…There is no comparison between our inputs…
JASON says: 3 or 4 thousand milligrams doctor? I knew you would start creeping up to the 5 thousand milligram level sooner or later. Quite the contradiction though Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates, just yesterday, you claimed Jimi’s threshold was just 2000mg so you changed your phony story and lowered your milligrams. What’s up with that? I suggest you go back into the laboratory and get this milligram business sorted out. We can’t have you handing out prescriptions and giving an overdose.
“Firm forensics” doctor? How can the “forensics” be firm when you keep changing the milligrams on us each day? That isn’t “firm” that is shaky. That’s why you need to go back to the laboratory and settle on a real number you can claim for your phony hoax cuz you aren’t even sure what phony milligrams you’re claiming today.
Just a tip for you doctor, the difference between 3 and 4 thousand milligrams is quite a lot, that’s a 1000mg difference. A person can overdose on 1000mg if they can’t handle it.
4000mg is not the same as 3000mg. Didn’t Moe or Shemp Howard teach you that at The Three Stooges School of Medicine?
Most overdoses occur in the 1-2 hour mark and you’re assigning 4000mg to Jimi Hendrix who died on 9 Vesparax? Yikes!!
I certainly agree with you doctor that there is no comparison between our inputs…nobody in the world would want to compare with your input.
Make sure to get in the laboratory early today and get your milligrams under control. Then let us know what you find out and if you’re going for the big increase to 5000mg.
I think the Dean must have been Grouch Marx of this school of medicine. Dr. Yates should stop bribing lecturers to give him a pass mark and let him study at their “prestigious” university. Dr Yates will continue prescribing more and more mgs until you don’t need them anymore-you’ll be dead and buried but not before he performs an autopsy on you. LOL.
I believe it was Benny Hill who taught the “Introduction to Vesparax” course which made Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates an “expert” in his estimations of milligrams of Vesparax.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates then determined he would give the public a base 2000mg test trial and if they didn’t OD he would see they had a “famous tolerance” bumping it up to 3000mg or 4000mg. haha
You’re an idiot Jason and an obvious troll who doesn’t deserve any response…You’re like the stupid rat who plays with the rat trap and mocks it right before it snaps his neck…My posts have always made clear that 2000mg is the hard science threshold for overdose in persons with no tolerance…That is correct science and any reader can see you never made any serious attempt to check it out or show otherwise…My estimation that Jimi probably had a 3000mg tolerance is reasonable from the stories his friends told of Jimi’s tolerance…Anyone who reads this thread can see you never once made any attempt to answer this…It is correct science and it refutes you and your trolling claims…9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate…1350mg of that is Secobarbital and the other 450mg is slow-release Brallobarbitone…
Just to show what a crazy asshole Jason is, who isn’t paying any credible attention to what is being discussed here, I cited the Underwriter Laboratory case study history for Vesparax overdoses that was posted in Caesar Glebbeek’s ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication…That study showed that persons who took 1 to 6 more Vesparax tablets than Jimi took (10 to 15) never died in less than 4 hours…Jimi only took 9 and he died only 2 hours max after ingesting them…Even though this is the established credible codified science Jason ignores it and hand-waves that most overdoses occur within 1 to 2 hours…Jason is, of course, a trolling idiot who is only here to troll and disrupt which is why he is entering demented bullshit in response to this science because he knows he can’t answer it…What Jason is clearly running from in public and avoiding with demented trolling is the fact Vesparax overdoses from 10 to 15 tablets never kill in less than 4 hours…This was proven in clinical laboratory tests of the highest credibility…Jimi only took 9 and died in 1 to 2 hours…Despite Jason’s sick trolling he still hasn’t answered this…He can’t and that’s why he trolls it…And he’s lost this debate because of it…
Jason thinks his demented mixing up of what was written is getting him out of answering the basic evidence…It isn’t…We are still at the same argument Jason hasn’t answered that a person with no tolerance requires 2000mg of barbiturate to overdose…Jimi only had 1350mg of Secobarbital in him and 450mg of slow-release Brallobarbitone…The Brallobarbitone releases further in to the absorption period so only 1 to 2 hours in to the dose it would not register in the overdose range as significantly…Even so Jimi only had 1800mg total barbiturate in him from 9 Vesparax and his tolerance was reasonably 3000mg for Lethal Dose…There’s a reason why Monika’s doctors said the pills would not have killed Jimi…One of the British doctors agreed…These are the facts and you can see the twisted fucker Jason trollishly playing with them above while being mocked by them due to his inability to give any credible answer… Jason is an asshole who is obviously over his head and isn’t capable of seriously discussing this business…He shouldn’t be allowed to post amongst serious researchers or destroy good discussion threads with his crazy trolling…
It’s always refreshing to see a troll impersonating a doctor on the internet making “estimations” about milligrams for their patient and still not sure what the correct number is.
BUSTER says: My posts have always made clear that 2000mg is the hard science threshold for overdose in persons with no tolerance…That is correct science and any reader can see you never made any serious attempt to check it out or show otherwise…
JASON says: This is bogus and is not “hard science”. There are people allergic to 2000mg vitamins and you claim people can take a 2000mg dangerous barbiturate like Vesparax? Good thing you are an internet troll and not a real doctor. Otherwise, you would be facing a ton of medical malpractice and wrongful death law suits.
BUSTER says: My estimation that Jimi probably had a 3000mg tolerance is reasonable from the stories his friends told of Jimi’s tolerance…Anyone who reads this thread can see you never once made any attempt to answer this…It is correct science and it refutes you and your trolling claims…9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate…1350mg of that is Secobarbital and the other 450mg is slow-release Brallobarbitone…
JASON says: You mean you’re still not sure of Jimi’s mg “tolerance”? What were you doing in your laboratory? I thought you got this milligram thing nailed down.
Claiming “probably” does not make you a credible doctor. So, you haven’t refuted anything since you are only speculating saying “probably”.
Now you’re saying that a 3000mg tolerance is “reasonable” based from stories you read in a book? More speculation and nothing scientific. How can you claim this is “correct science” when you’re only speculating?
So, you admit in your own words that you have no idea what the hell you are talking about and you make up your own fake mg estimations based on a rumor you read in a conspiracy book. We already knew this but it’s nice to finally have you admit this to us.
BUSTER says: I cited the Underwriter Laboratory case study history for Vesparax overdoses that was posted in Caesar Glebbeek’s ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication…That study showed that persons who took 1 to 6 more Vesparax tablets than Jimi took (10 to 15) never died in less than 4 hours…Jimi only took 9 and he died only 2 hours max after ingesting them…Even though this is the established credible codified science Jason ignores it and hand-waves that most overdoses occur within 1 to 2 hours…Jason is, of course, a trolling idiot who is only here to troll and disrupt which is why he is entering demented bullshit in response to this science because he knows he can’t answer it…What Jason is clearly running from in public and avoiding with demented trolling is the fact Vesparax overdoses from 10 to 15 tablets never kill in less than 4 hours…This was proven in clinical laboratory tests of the highest credibility…Jimi only took 9 and died in 1 to 2 hours…Despite Jason’s sick trolling he still hasn’t answered this…He can’t and that’s why he trolls it…And he’s lost this debate because of it…
JASON says: Caesar Glebbeek’s “Until We Meet Again” publication? That’s the publication you trashed saying it “wasn’t worth the paper it’s printed on” and that “whoever cites or quotes this publication is not credible”. So, in your own words you are not credible Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates. How many Vesparax are you taking to be citing your arch nemesis Ceasar Glebbeek?
Funny how all the people you call liars and frauds you end up using their false claims as your sources.
So. you cite Caesar Glebbeek who you say is fraudulent but use him anyway for your hoax. Caesar also said Jimi died from a drug overdose. So, you are refuted by Caesar. Hilarious!
So, studies were done of other people after Jimi Hendrix already died from barbiturate poisoning of a lethal drug overdose. That proves nothing for your hoax. You are only citing after the fact deaths that have no relevance to Jimi Hendrix. Those other people didn’t ingest a powerful amphetamine along with it and were over the legal alcohol limit like Jimi was. Forensic analysis proved Jimi inhaled vomit and died from suffocation. The forensic analysis of Jimi’s body returned an above toxic 0.7mg barbiturate level that would have killed him anyway. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed to the media that Jimi died from a drug overdose. The doctors made the confirmation of a drug overdose and had Dr. Bob Brown present during the media release to the public. St. Mary Abbots hospital would not ruin their reputation by putting out a false statement about the death of a world famous musician. After that, Dr. Teare discovered the 0.7mg above lethal level and Dr. Thurston made the drug overdose official that caused the inhalation of vomit.
BUSTER says: Jason thinks his demented mixing up of what was written is getting him out of answering the basic evidence…It isn’t…We are still at the same argument Jason hasn’t answered that a person with no tolerance requires 2000mg of barbiturate to overdose…Jimi only had 1350mg of Secobarbital in him and 450mg of slow-release Brallobarbitone…The Brallobarbitone releases further in to the absorption period so only 1 to 2 hours in to the dose it would not register in the overdose range as significantly…Even so Jimi only had 1800mg total barbiturate in him from 9 Vesparax and his tolerance was reasonably 3000mg for Lethal Dose…There’s a reason why Monika’s doctors said the pills would not have killed Jimi…One of the British doctors agreed…These are the facts and you can see the twisted fucker Jason trollishly playing with them above while being mocked by them due to his inability to give any credible answer… Jason is an asshole who is obviously over his head and isn’t capable of seriously discussing this business…He shouldn’t be allowed to post amongst serious researchers or destroy good discussion threads with his crazy trolling…
JASON says: LoL Monika’s doctors. The same doctors who told her not to take more than 1/2 pill. Then these doctors are suddenly going to recommend taking a 9 pill overdose when the dosage is 1 pill? Monika’s doctors weren’t doing the autopsy, were they? They didn’t see the 0.7 above toxic barbituate level. They are making after the fact claims.
Your fake made up mg numbers makes you look even more foolish. Your bogus claim that everybody can take 2000mg of Vesparax is asinine. No “British doctor” agreed cuz you can’t even cite a name for your hoax. You have no clue what mg Jimi Hendrix can tolerate. You are confused even with your own fake made up numbers. Jimi died on 9 Vesparax pills and you can’t refute forensic science that’s already been determined.
All you can do is nay say and hand waive real forensic analysis that proved a lethal overdose with you claiming “it didn’t happen” based on your bogus claims when forensic science says it did. That’s called trolling and in a strictly moderated room you would be made to be held accountable for your hoaxing and blatant denials.
Then for your rebuttal, all you can offer is your own fake mg numbers you made up based on a rumor you read in a conspiracy book. You cite Monika Dannemann’s claims who you say is a liar and Ceasar Glebbeek who you say is a fraud. That’s all you have and call that “hard science” which is a joke. But you deny forenisc science results from the former top doctors in the world and the offical death drug overdose statement from St. Mary Abbots Hospital. Hilarious.
Get back into your laboratory doctor and find a permanent mg number for Jimi Hendrix. None of this “probably” stuff cuz “probably” is not “hard science”, it’s hoaxing, and you have refuted nothing and you never will.
I have never seen a prescription medication with a dosage of 1,2,3,4,5 thousand mg. They simply don’t exist for a reason. The dosage for Vesparax is half a tablet because of their strength. Jimi took nine so this is way beyond the recommended dosage. He died shortly afterwards because Monika started calling around for help early in the morning. Monika probably felt guilt over the fact that her pills were responsible for Jimi’s death so she said that her doctors said they weren’t. I have a real problem with the wording Jimi only took 9 suggesting that this wasn’t a lethal dose when it clearly was. The pills killed Jimi because he didn’t stick to the recommended dosage for Vesparax.
BUSTER says: My estimation that Jimi probably had a 3000mg tolerance is reasonable from the stories his friends told of Jimi’s tolerance…Anyone who reads this thread can see you never once made any attempt to answer this…It is correct science and it refutes you and your trolling claims…
JASON: Probably you say? So, you don’t even know what you’re saying. Do you? Then you say your “probably” is “correct science” and it “refutes” me. You can’t refute someone based on phony speculation when you don’t even know what you’re talking about.
Stories from friends? So, you base your fake 3000mg tolerance claim on rumors you read in a conspiracy book? You say it’s “reasonable” but you admit you don’t know what you’re talking about. This is not “science”. These are phony made up mg numbers by you. You can’t refute someone posting phony mg claims.
So, you reject the forensically analyzed documented 0.7mg lethal barbiturate level that was above toxic in Jimi Hendrix and instead make up your own fake mg estimations based on rumors you read in a conspiracy book.
You believe your phony mg estimations is “correct science” and the real forensic evidence that proved a 0.7mg above toxic barbituate level in Jimi Hendrix by top pathologists is not “science” and you claim you know more about forensic science than they did.
You are nuts and nothing you claim is scientific. For your sake, please seek some mental help.
This bogus science of Dr. Yates is just so dumb. There was a very clear recommended dosage for Monika’s pills and that was half a tablet. Where exactly did it state on the packet that it’s safe to take as much as 3,000mgs and you’ll be fine. I know in Dr. Yates deranged mind.
No, I was just being polite…The 3000mg is close to accurate and deserves a better answer than your trolling equivocations…You never address any medical science because you know it refutes you…If you bothered to check out what I am posting, vs known barbiturate science, 3000mg is a safe determination for Jimi’s tolerance as far as the required amount of barbiturates he would need to reach Lethal Dose…But you still haven’t answered the point…It is known barbiturate science that a person who has no tolerance requires 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…9 Vesparax only has 1800mg and that wouldn’t cut it even if Jimi had no tolerance…This isn’t “phony speculation” as you say…It is accurate barbiturate science and forensics that you are only proving your lack of credibility by mocking…Which is why you can’t answering it short of your trolling ridicule…Just the amount of vomit alone proves Jimi didn’t die from the barbiturate since less than a Lethal Dose doesn’t cause that kind of intense vomiting…Forced drowning does however…
But you are moving this conversation away from the pertinent evidence…There’s no doubt Dr Crompton’s confirmation of the “Lungs full of fluid” that he told to Kathy Ethchingham is the same 5 bottles of wine Dr Bannister witnessed drowning Jimi…And since lungs full of fluid/wine is not normal for a barbiturate overdose, let alone a dose that wasn’t strong enough to cause overdose, we are at a point of reasonable evidence that you haven’t answered…
Your posts are conspicuously those of a drowning troll flailing in his own idiotic replies…Since 1800mg is not enough to cause a .7mg/100ml “lethal level” you are continuing to come up short in the credible evidence department and only securing your own loss as far as this debate…
It always makes me laugh when Buster pretends to be an authority based on phony made up claims. Buster’s pretend science of mg numbers needs more work.
BUSTER says: I was just being polite…The 3000mg is close to accurate and deserves a better answer than your trolling equivocations…You never address any medical science because you know it refutes you…If you bothered to check out what I am posting, vs known barbiturate science, 3000mg is a safe determination for Jimi’s tolerance as far as the required amount of barbiturates he would need to reach Lethal Dose…But you still haven’t answered the point…It is known barbiturate science that a person who has no tolerance requires 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…9 Vesparax only has 1800mg and that wouldn’t cut it even if Jimi had no tolerance…This isn’t “phony speculation” as you say…It is accurate barbiturate science and forensics that you are only proving your lack of credibility by mocking…Which is why you can’t answering it short of your trolling ridicule…Just the amount of vomit alone proves Jimi didn’t die from the barbiturate since less than a Lethal Dose doesn’t cause that kind of intense vomiting…Forced drowning does however…
JASON says: “Close to accurate” you say? Barbiturate science is supposed to be accurate not “close to accurate”. That weak answer you gave is an admission your claims are false. You make up your own fake mg numbers and then say it’s “close to accurate”. That kind of claim only deserves mockery and is not worthy in a serious discussion about forensics and medicine.
I fully address medical science all the time. The 0.7mg above lethal toxic number is hard forensic science that proved a lethal dose and you ignore that hard science and replace it with your fake made up mg numbers you change for Jimi Hendrix.
Everything you post is based on your own personal claims, there is no science behind it. Forensic medical science already proved Jimi had a lethal dose and you nay say real science. You look really stupid denying forensic autopsy results with claims you can never prove. Forced drowning does not induced intense vomiting. Your claim is that Jimi was forced drowned to be “murdered”. In that case, Jimi would have been drowned to death and then quickly be dead. There would be no time for vomiting. The autopsy showed all the evidence of a drug overdose, there were no signs of a “forced drowning” and even the police and ambulance men who witnessed the death scene confirmed it was a drug overdose. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose. The autopsy proved it. All you can do is make poor denials and you never can show any documents for your wine.
BUSTER says: you are moving this conversation away from the pertinent evidence…There’s no doubt Dr Crompton’s confirmation of the “Lungs full of fluid” that he told to Kathy Ethchingham is the same 5 bottles of wine Dr Bannister witnessed drowning Jimi…And since lungs full of fluid/wine is not normal for a barbiturate overdose, let alone a dose that wasn’t strong enough to cause overdose, we are at a point of reasonable evidence that you haven’t answered…
JASON says: The claims you make up is not “pertinent evidence”. I’ve asked you since last July to produce anything documented on wine and you never do. You make baseless claims of wine and lie about the real evidence adding your fake claims to it. There is no record of “5 bottles of wine”. That’s something you made up. If there was all that wine, as you claim, there would be documented records of it. No wine was ever detected in Jimi’s stomach or lungs or fluid during the autopsy. You want people to believe claims without ever producing any documented evidence. All the documented evidence refutes you. But all you do is offer denials and make your own claims instead without any evidence.
BUSTER says: Your posts are conspicuously those of a drowning troll flailing in his own idiotic replies…Since 1800mg is not enough to cause a .7mg/100ml “lethal level” you are continuing to come up short in the credible evidence department and only securing your own loss as far as this debate…
JASON says: Forensic medical science already determined Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates. It’s forever in the books and you can only deny it based on your inaccurate conspiracy theories that you can never produce any documented evidence to overturn the results.
Ambulance men confirmed an overdose, the police confirmed an overdose, St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed an overdose, the pathologist confirmed an overdose, the coroner confirmed an overdose. All these medical professionals and the medical science they used can’t be wrong. Forensic medical science proved it and that refutes your “phony science claims” and trolling denials.
Strange how none of the doctors said anything about there being a safe threshold for Vesparax beyond the recommended dosage of half a tablet. Everyone who attended to Jimi that morning saw this has an overdose, and the autopsy confirmed this. No medical report stated anything about the presence of wine as the cause of death as the barbiturate levels were the contributing factor.
I can’t find any reference to Dr. Quack’s suggestion that Jimi had a high tolerance to drugs. Yet Jimi died 50 years ago at 27 years of age because he took too many sleeping pills. He was no Superman when it came to Monika’s Vesparax with a safe dosage of only half a tablet. The fluid in Jimi’s lungs was a direct consequence of the barbiturate overdose and not as Dr. Quack wants us to believe a forced drowning with red wine. The autopsy report would have identified the liquid as wine but it didn’t therefore the liquid was not wine it was produced by the overdose. No where did Dr. Crompton say to Kathy that the fluid was wine this is something our Dr. Quack has invented to suit his own needs along with other questionable findings. The death certificate stated nothing about he presence of wine as the cause of death only the barbiturates and vomit. All medication whether prescription or over-the-counter state Take Strictly As Directed Jimi didn’t of course and paid the ultimate price.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates makes the bogus claim that “Jimi had a famous tolerance to drugs” so he can then claim Jimi didn’t die from a drug overdose. It’s all part of his hoax.
Forensic medical science determined that Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates with a 0.7mg level. The Doctor of Hoaxing looks very foolish trying to argue against forensic analysis.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates then claims fluid is wine to continue running his hoax.
But our phony doctor can only make bogus claims and never has any documented evidence to produce since nothing exists for his hoax he peddles.
BUSTER says: The 3000mg is close to accurate.
JASON says: Sorry doctor, “close to accurate” does not cut it. In order to be seen as credible, you need to be totally accurate. You can’t be taken seriously when you’re not accurate. This response you just posted tells the Jimi Hendrix Community you are not credible or accurate with your estimations. This means you’re not taken seriously. Who can take a person seriously when they admit they are not accurate like you just did? So, you admit you’re not accurate and then want us to believe your phony 3000mg as “science”. Since you’re not accurate with the phony 3000mg claim just wanting to be lazy with any old number, that means nobody can trust any of the mg numbers you make up, or any of your claims for that matter since you don’t care if you’re accurate. In medicine and research, you need to be accurate. With your admission, you’re telling us that you don’t care and will use any claim to post. That’s why you will always be wrong doctor. I suggest you go back into the laboratory and work hard on getting the accurate mg numbers for Jimi Hendrix. The lazy and sloppy work you’re doing is a disgrace to every hoaxer in your field.
Jason, Have you noticed that when we uncover another lie by Dr.Quack for his absurd claims he comes up with an even more outrageous claim. It’s almost as if he’s got to top the last claim he made. The Jimi Hendrix Community already knows what happened to Jimi and we don’t need our “good” doctor to tell us.
Yes Ivana, I read it each time we refute this hoaxer. What’s funny is his new outrageous lie debunks the previous lie and as a result debunks his entire bogus hoax.
Hi Ivana,
The Doctor of Hoaxing is full of fake claims just like the phony “5 bottles of wine” claim. He claimed he “spoke with Bannister” about “wine”. A poster on another forum asked Scrum Drum aka Buster a question if the “wine was measured”. Scrum Drum aka Buster never mentions “5 bottles of wine” or any measurement and gives a vague answer. This proves he came up with the fake “5 bottles of wine” claim later on cuz he was on Amazon posting as “Albert Doyle” talking about 3 bottles first.
Scrum Drum says “it was put into a container but he didn’t know what happened to it”. That proves there was no measurement of the phony wine he claims. So, this troll can’t make the “5 bottles of wine” claim since no measurements were taken.
But there was no phony wine anyway, but this exposes the “5 bottles of wine” claim as another fraudulent story by this hoaxer.
Also, Jimi’s life could not be saved since he was already a dead decomposing 7 1/2 hour corpse declared dead on arrival. So, another bogus claim of a “life saving procedure”.
stnmtthw: Ok. How many bottles of wine were ejected out of Hendrix’s lungs? Was it measured?
Scrum Drum: Bannister said it was put into a container but he doesn’t know what happened to it. Those things were handled by the nurses. He told me we were just trying to save his life at the time.
Hi Jason, Yes the disappearing wine trick as Maxwell Smart would say. Dr. Quack just keeps increasing the number of wine bottles just like he does with the mgs when it suits him. All the things we’ve said are completely right. No-one said anything about wine all they mentioned was overdose meaning drugs were involved no-one said that this was an alcohol related death. Jimi was DOA no doctor would be performing procedures on a long dead corpse; this is just another outrageous claim.
Maybe 99 and The Chief will catch “The Mad Doctor” making up phony milligram numbers in his laboratory. LOL.
He still admits he isn’t accurate with his phony mg numbers and he claims it’s “science”.
Every document proved it was drugs and so did every expert witness.
Crompton confirmed Jimi died around 4am so that makes it 7 1/2 hours he was dead when he reached the hospital. No hospital works on a dead decomposing 7 1/2 hour corpse.
Jason continues to make my case for me with his uncredible trolling answers…
What is lacking from this “debate” is any credible oversight or moderation…If this were a court of law we could have my barbiturate science claims scrutinized to see if they were valid…They are and they check out…Jason deals with science he can’t answer by trolling and hand-waving that I’m making it all up…Actually, no, I’m not and my references check out…Pretty dead accurate as a matter of fact and soundly based in firmly established science…Jason delivers a rather simple-minded and crude form of denial trolling in reaction to them…
In that credibly moderated room Jason would be made to account for his lying and running from my science that he obviously can’t answer in public…Not only would the material be judged but the poster too and Jason and his idiotic trolling would have been booted from any credible forum long ago…So we wouldn’t even be at this point where I had to answer Jason’s trolling evasions…Not only is my estimation of a 3000mg tolerance for Jimi pretty accurate but Jason’s phony demand for exact preciseness is being used to avoid answering the rest of what I wrote…Jimi still didn’t have enough barbiturate in him to overdose…Jimi had 1800mg total when a person with no tolerance needed 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…We can ignore Jason’s trolling in response to this…He has permanently failed to answer this credible science and forfeits the debate because of it…
When Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid when he reached the hospital he had a medical obligation as chief pathologist to investigate its meaning…Crompton would know that was not normal and needed further forensic review…Especially with the trace blood alcohol content in relation…Additionally, Crompton must have gotten that information from one of the doctors…That doctor could have been Dr Bannister which means the chief forensic officer of top credibility at the London Coroner’s Office accepted that “fluid” as real enough to confirm to Kathy…This is proof enough of a cover-up because Crompton concealed that the fluid was actually wine in order to evade its forensic meaning…What Crompton was required to do by his medical oath and training was call the attending doctors for testimony concerning the wine as well as the corroborating nurses and ambulance attendants…Since this asshole Jason is just here to troll he sincerely ignores all this and hopes we take him seriously…An honest look in to Jimi’s death by the British authorities was criminally avoided at this proven impasse…Any honest follow-through by Crompton on those lungs full of fluid (and stomach full of wine as confirmed by the head of the London Coroner’s Office Dr Thurston), as he was legally/medically required to do, would have quickly produced confirmation of the wine and therefore confirmation of its forensic status as proof of homicide…
Any fool would know that the context of Dr Crompton saying “Jimi would have died from the pills anyway” was the words of a doctor who had been brought in on a cover-up who was really saying “Anyway, that is, if he hadn’t been forcefully drowned in wine”…I don’t blame Kathy because she was still trying to figure out the first round of incriminating evidence she had uncovered…Unfortunately, what needed to be done right at that instant was Kathy needed to confront Dr Crompton on the lungs full of fluid and the fact that fluid was wine, the blood alcohol content, and how it effected the rest of the forensics…If she had she would have nailed it and forced some choice quotes from Crompton…Kathy had an opportunity there to blow it open by crying murder in the British media and demanding a review in public of the wine and testimony from the nurses…
Buster the Hoaxer needs new material for his scam. He’s exhausted this same script
and it’s become boring.
Buster, post an offical documented hospital report of Bannister recording “wine”.
Buster, post a documented statement of Thurston confirming “wine” in his own words.
Buster, post a documented report of the fluid being “wine” as you lie about.
Prepare for excuses, more lies, or the ignoring by Buster to post evidence for his lies about “wine”. No evidence exists cuz neither does the fake wine.
BUSTER says: Jason continues to make my case for me with his uncredible trolling answers…
JASON says: You never had a case. That’s the whole point. You promote a debunked hoax and you look more stupid each time you post it.
BUSTER says” What is lacking from this “debate” is any credible oversight or moderation…If this were a court of law we could have my barbiturate science claims scrutinized to see if they were valid…They are and they check out…Jason deals with science he can’t answer by trolling and hand-waving that I’m making it all up…Actually, no, I’m not and my references check out…Pretty dead accurate as a matter of fact and soundly based in firmly established science…Jason delivers a rather simple-minded and crude form of denial trolling in reaction to them…
JASON says: Pretty dead accurate you say? So, you are not accurate like you need to be. You’re admitting to us you are not accurate. Science is always dead on accurate. Again, you’re admitting to me, Ivana, and everybody else that you’re not credible with your phony numbers. Your phony numbers have nothing to do with science. You read a rumor in a conspiracy book that “Jimi had a high tolerance to drugs” and then you make up fake mg numbers for Jimi Hendrix claiming it’s “barbiturate science”. That is not “science” that is nonsense.
BUSTER says: In that credibly moderated room Jason would be made to account for his lying and running from my science that he obviously can’t answer in public…Not only would the material be judged but the poster too and Jason and his idiotic trolling would have been booted from any credible forum long ago…So we wouldn’t even be at this point where I had to answer Jason’s trolling evasions…Not only is my estimation of a 3000mg tolerance for Jimi pretty accurate but Jason’s phony demand for exact preciseness is being used to avoid answering the rest of what I wrote…Jimi still didn’t have enough barbiturate in him to overdose…Jimi had 1800mg total when a person with no tolerance needed 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…We can ignore Jason’s trolling in response to this…He has permanently failed to answer this credible science and forfeits the debate because of it…
JASON says: Pretty accurate you say? Once again, you are confirming to us that you are not accurate or credible. So, you are not to be taken seriously. Forensic medical science proved back in 1970 that 9 Vesparax pills killed Jimi Hendrix which returned a 0.7mg above lethal barbiturate level. Buster the hoaxing troll can never refute this science with his nay saying denials and his fake mg lies.
“Buster” has been banned from every site and forum he’s posted on with his fake alias names for trolling and blatantly lying pushing a hoax with no evidence he can ever offer. Buster’s “science” consists of making up fake mg numbers for Jimi Hendrix in his crazy head. That’s why he is banned and laughed off every forum he’s ever posted on.
BUSTER says: When Dr Crompton told Kathy Etchingham Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid when he reached the hospital he had a medical obligation as chief pathologist to investigate its meaning…Crompton would know that was not normal and needed further forensic review…Especially with the trace blood alcohol content in relation…Additionally, Crompton must have gotten that information from one of the doctors…That doctor could have been Dr Bannister which means the chief forensic officer of top credibility at the London Coroner’s Office accepted that “fluid” as real enough to confirm to Kathy…This is proof enough of a cover-up because Crompton concealed that the fluid was actually wine in order to evade its forensic meaning…What Crompton was required to do by his medical oath and training was call the attending doctors for testimony concerning the wine as well as the corroborating nurses and ambulance attendants…Since this asshole Jason is just here to troll he sincerely ignores all this and hopes we take him seriously…An honest look in to Jimi’s death by the British authorities was criminally avoided at this proven impasse…Any honest follow-through by Crompton on those lungs full of fluid (and stomach full of wine as confirmed by the head of the London Coroner’s Office Dr Thurston), as he was legally/medically required to do, would have quickly produced confirmation of the wine and therefore confirmation of its forensic status as proof of homicide…
JASON says: “Buster” adds his usual debunked hoax lies cuz he has nothing else to say. He posts no evidence and just narrates the same lies of imaginary wine. “Buster” peppers his paragraph with words like “must have” and “could have” which once again proves nothing he says is accurate or credible.
Jimi Hendrix had a blood alcohol level above the legal limit and that’s been known since September 28, 1970. Buster the troll continues to lie about this historical fact.
Fraud Bannister is a 3 count convicted fraud who is recognized as a clown in the medical profession for making up blatant lies of wine with no documentation on an official hospital report.
Buster fraudulently says the fluid was wine but forensic analysis of the fluid showed no wine was ever detected. Buster makes up this bogus lie and that’s all he can do which is why he is banned from every site and forum he posts on.
Buster now smears the reputation of Dr. Crompton saying he was involved in a “cover up”. Buster makes this bogus lie cuz Dr. Crompton refutes his hoax. Buster never has any documented evidence for his phony lies. That’s why he is banned from every site and forum he posts on.
Dr. Thurston confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that was proven by forensic science. Sharon Lawrence made up the lie about Thurston and “wine” in her fiction book. There is no official statement written or verbally confirmed with Dr. Thurston mentioning wine in Jimi Hendrix.
Buster makes up his lies of imaginary wine and can never produce any documentation of any of the bullshit he writes.
Not one medical professional who worked on Jimi Hendrix ever said anything about “homicide”.
St. Mary Abotts Hospital confirmed to the media that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose. Fraud Bannister was the doctor who prepared the statement to the press. Fraud Bannister made up his lies of wine in January of 1992 after he read Electric Gypsy cuz he thought he was going sued for medical malpractice.
BUSTER says: Any fool would know that the context of Dr Crompton saying “Jimi would have died from the pills anyway” was the words of a doctor who had been brought in on a cover-up who was really saying “Anyway, that is, if he hadn’t been forcefully drowned in wine”…I don’t blame Kathy because she was still trying to figure out the first round of incriminating evidence she had uncovered…Unfortunately, what needed to be done right at that instant was Kathy needed to confront Dr Crompton on the lungs full of fluid and the fact that fluid was wine, the blood alcohol content, and how it effected the rest of the forensics…If she had she would have nailed it and forced some choice quotes from Crompton…Kathy had an opportunity there to blow it open by crying murder in the British media and demanding a review in public of the wine and testimony from the nurses…
JASON says: Any fool like “Buster” can make up blatant lies with no evidence. He’s been pushing this laughable denunked hoax for 11 years and has been banned from every Jimi Hendrix site and forum for doing it. Not one single medical report says anything about fake and phony wine. This fake wine story came from Fraud Bannister in 1992 and he never even wrote a report on his fake wine in 1970. It’s decades later fake claims from a fraud doctor cuz St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose back in 1970.
Here we go putting words into the mouth of Dr. Crompton with your wine hoax. We know the fluid wasn’t wine this is something you’re concocted. Kathy knew nothing about the wine because it was never mentioned or brought up during the investigation because there was no evidence of it; it simply wasn’t an issue because it didn’t exist. The sad reality was that Jimi could not have survived because of the toxic dose of the Vesparax he took causing him to choke on his own vomit which in turn destroyed his liver because of high concentrated dosage.
I think tin foil hatters are well aware of posthumous defamation laws that’s why they can get away with saying just about anything they like about the dead. While it’s noble to try and get to the bottom of why something happened it’s also pointless as none of the people involved can be prosecuted, and this is part of the attraction and what draws these hoaxers to certain stories. Kathy’s investigation differed because it was done at a time when most of the main personnel were still alive. All that was revealed during this investigation was that there was a large gap between the time Jimi actually died and when the ambulance was finally called. It didn’t reveal that Jimi was murdered in fact it reinforced the original findings that Jimi died as a result of swallowing too many Vesparax. There was no mention of wine by Dr.Crompton to Kathy. Tin foil hatters report bogus facts since they haven’t done any real investigation of their own; they manufacture their “evidence”. They haven’t been to any real laboratory to do their research or witnessed any autopsy themselves. Dr. Quack didn’t witness any of the fluid himself yet he calls it wine even though the forensic team who were actually there to perform the autopsy never said the fluid was wine or saw anything resembling wine. The cover-up that Dr.Quack mentions over and over never actually occurred it’s just another bogus fact intended to deceive the reader hoping people will be duped into believing it. That’s how these hoaxers operate.
BUSTER says: In that credibly moderated room Jason would be made to account for his lying and running from my science that he obviously can’t answer in public…
JASON says: “Buster’s science” is fake mg numbers he made up in his crazy head which he continues to admit is not accurate. Forensic medical science determined Jimi died from an above toxic and lethal 0.7mg barbituate level that refutes this troll.
I’m posting documented forensic evidence and accurate eye witness accounts from credible witnesses which are not lies. You post a bunch of crap you make up for your hoax and you have been banned from every moderated room on the internet. Same old boring script you use. I guess you feel useless rambling makes up for the fact you will never have any evidence for a decent rebuttal.
BUSTER says: Not only would the material be judged but the poster too and Jason and his idiotic trolling would have been booted from any credible forum long ago…
JASON says: Yes, the material I post is confirmed documented evidence that’s already determined the lethal 0.7mg barbiturate overdose of Jimi Hendrix. All credible forums recognize this same documented forensic evidence as factual and important to prove Jimi’s lethal overdose. You on the other hand, post outright lies and have been banned from all those credible forums for doing so.
BUSTER says: So we wouldn’t even be at this point where I had to answer Jason’s trolling evasions…
JASON says: Buster the hoaxer keeps whining to have me banned cuz I’ve exposed his hoax and he can’t answer the facts I refute him with.
BUSTER says: Not only is my estimation of a 3000mg tolerance for Jimi pretty accurate but Jason’s phony demand for exact preciseness is being used to avoid answering the rest of what I wrote…Jimi still didn’t have enough barbiturate in him to overdose…Jimi had 1800mg total when a person with no tolerance needed 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…We can ignore Jason’s trolling in response to this…He has permanently failed to answer this credible science and forfeits the debate because of it…
JASON says: You constantly admit that you are not accurate, like you just did again above, so what you are posting is not credible. Making up phony miligram numbers as you do is not “science”. That’s called a joke. We will ignore the lies you peddle for your hoax since it is not worthy of a serious discussion.
Jimi had an above lethal 0.7mg toxic barbituate level number from 9 Vesparax pills that was forensically proven by science. That number is dead accurate through real forensic science and is documented evidence that will forever refute the crap numbers you make up in your crazy head pretending to be a mad doctor for Jimi Hendrix.
I did not read Jason’s last two posts…I read the part where he tried to switch the subject to documents and stopped reading…A denial troll who has been defeated by the facts has to stay on the offensive with aggressive questions in order to escape the fact he can’t answer the evidence so that is all you are seeing here…
Jason avoided answering the fact that Crompton was required by medical law and science to consult with Chief Coroner Thurston on the stomach full of red wine…Dr Crompton was England’s best forensic pathologist at the time and that is why Kathy went to him…Being a pathologist of that skill and credentials Crompton would have known that if the stomach was filled with wine then the “fluid” he recognized to Kathy as filling Jimi’s lungs was also likely to be wine…Crompton would have found that out easily if he had done his job and consulted Dr Bannister…In any case, basic forensic pathology required Crompton to check out why a stomach full of red wine, that the number one pathologist Thurston admitted, produced only a trace blood alcohol content?…And he then needed to explore why a less than lethal dose caused Jimi to be drowned in a massive amount of wine that left no blood alcohol trace?…All these things were Crompton’s job and he failed to do them…The reason for that is obvious…Jimi was a political assassination that involved intelligence interests and the British government was not about to expose one of its own intelligence agents murdering a world-famous superstar…Fuck you if you are trying to tell me that with the tables turned and the British government using all its police, detective, judicial, and forensic resources that it would not have quickly prosecuted a homicide case with the exact same evidence…
Jason knows he can’t answer this which is why he is trying to troll bait me into a specious discussion on documents…But Jason is already dead as far as his credibility in this debate and forfeits the debate itself by being publicly unable to answer this evidence…
Well, just as I predicted “Buster” the hoaxing troll would ignore the calls for him to post documents and real evidence for the lies he peddles. Then he goes right back to writing his stories of fiction claiming that I can’t answer the fake stories he makes up in his crazy head. This is how a troll operates, they post nothing of real value and can never produce any documentation for their lies.
Every legitimate and credible poster uses documents to prove their point. Do you think a judge would just believe the crap “Buster” lies about or would the judge demand him to produce documents and evidence of the imaginary wine he lies about? Only a liar, hoaxer, fraud, and troll would object to using documents to prove they are a legitimate poster. Buster the Hoaxer refuses to discuss documents cuz he makes up his own lies and has no evidence or documents to provide. It’s just a fake story he tells and he is the only person to make these absurd stories up. That’s how you know what he says is always bullshit.
Bogus story, invented numbers and fake forensics-a murder that never took place, corrupt doctors and government officials, falsified official documents, lies, sinister individuals, a botched autopsy and a huge cover-up. Make sure you check this out under the fiction section in your nearest library or bookstore.
The pages of this fictional farce would best be used to line the bottom of a cat litter box.
Spot on, Jason
Hi Ivana,
Have you ever noticed how “Buster” narrates his phony story like he was an eye witness to all the fake stories he makes up and that he is the only troll to even talk about the lies he peddles?
Hi Jason, Dr Buster wouldn’t know the truth if it came up and bit him. He calls you a troll when he’s the one doing the trolling. This guy is a storyteller that’s about it, and not a very good one. Neither of us fell for anything he wrote.
I laugh each time Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates calls me a troll.
I’m posting documented forensic numbers, information from legitimate news sources, and expert testimony from witnesses which is all verified and accurate.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates uses several fake alias names to push a hoax based on his own made up lies and his fraud sources who’s bogus claims all have been debunked. He has called them liars but uses the lies that fit with his hoax. He is terrified of having to produce documents now cuz he doesn’t have any since he makes up his own lies. That’s why he claiming an absurd phony “victory” and scampering away like a sniveling coward. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is an 11 year hoaxer trolling Jimi’s death with his phony murder caper in which he has been banned from every site and forum he’s ever posted on. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is a clown who believes he is a doctor for Jimi Hendrix making up fake mg numbers.
Albert Doyle Buster Yates thinks the more times he calls me a troll he will somehow have credibility. He has no credibility and is a laughing stock on every site he’s posted on and is a joke in the Jimi Hendrix Community known as a clownish trolling buffoon.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates isn’t even sure of his bogus milligrams he makes up as he changes his fake milligram numbers again each day. Only a hoaxing troll changes their stories all the time.
BUSTER says: Jimi had a 3000mg or 4000mg overdose threshold.
BUSTER says: January 22, 2020
Jimi had the pills in him for so he provably didn’t reach the 2000mg overdose threshold.
BUSTER says: January 23, 2020
My posts have always made clear that 2000mg is the hard science threshold for overdose in persons with no tolerance…
JASON says: Our “mad doctor” Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates claims Jimi had a 3000mg or 4000mg overdose threshold with a high tolerance.
On January 22nd Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates clearly says Jimi’s 2000mg overdose threshold changing it from the bogus 3000-4000mg he said before.
Now on January 23rd he lies saying that 2000mg is for people with no tolerance when he said Jimi had a high tolerance needing 2000mg on January 22nd. Which is It? 2000mg can’t be for both low and high.
So, you can see how this troll changes his fake milligrams each day as he runs his debunked hoax. One day it’s 3000mg or 4000mg for Jimi and then he changes it to 2000mg and back and forth again.
Then he lies telling us 2000mg is for people with no tolerance. He already gave Jimi 2000mg too saying it wasn’t his overdose threshold. He says Jimi had a high tolerance but needed 2000mg like he does for his phony no tolerance claim.
We can easily see that this hoaxing phony Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is making it up as he goes along forgetting which phony milligrams he makes up for Jimi Hendrix and for “people with no tolerance” in his crazy deranged head.
This clown is no doctor and has no idea about milligrams, medicine, science, and how much drugs Jimi and people in society can handle. He just makes numbers up and changes it when he wants to like he does with all of his fake stories. We all can see this whole thing is ridiculous and everybody reading along are nodding their heads in agreement.
Lies keep changing while the truth remains the same.
Hi Jason, Just where did this rubbish claim that Jimi had a high tolerance to drugs come from? He overdosed on nine Vesparax a visit to Renton Cemetery in Seattle should bring a touch of reality to this absurd claim.
Hi Ivana,
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates said he read a story from a friend of Jimi’s who said he had a high tolerance to drugs.
So, Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates bases his “dead accurate barbiturate science” on a rumor as he makes up his own fake mg numbers that he changes each day.
I believe Dr Albert Doyle Buster Yates made up this bogus “high tolerance” nonsense for his hoax so he can deny Jimi’s overdose. He can claim “Jimi couldn’t have died from 9 Vesparax pills cuz he needed X amount to die so it had to be the wine”. This is what he has been hoaxing with for 11 years.
Our “mad doctor” lowered his milligram dosage for Jimi Hendrix again today.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates now adjusted his dosage down to 2000mg to reach Jimi’s overdose threshold. Before he was saying Jimi needed 3000mg to 4000mg cuz of his high tolerance. So, this hoaxing clown has no idea what he wants to claim and says “I can’t answer his fake numbers” that he changes each day. It’s a toal joke.
The “high tolerance” claim is bogus and real forensic science proves it to be.
Jimi overdosed and almost died on 5 Mandrax pills. He couldn’t perform on stage with 3 sedatives. That amount of drugs proves Jimi didn’t have a “high tolerance” to drugs since that amount is not even close to 9 pills and the strength of 9 Vesparax.
The phony Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates believes taking 15 Vesparax pills wouldn’t have killed Jimi Hendrix when 9 Vesparax pills did.
Forensic medical science determined that Jimi had an above toxic 0.7mg barbiturate level which is barbiturate poisoning from 9 Vesparax pills. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates can never refute this number.
Our “mad doctor” Albert Doyle Buster Yates then makes up his own phony milligrams for Jimi Hendrix and calls that “barbiturate science” believing his always changing fake mg numbers defeats real forensic science that proved Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates back in 1970.
Our “mad doctor” needs to be fitted for a straight jacket.
Fitted with a straight jacket, put in a padded cell and the key thrown away never to be released. Dr. Buster sounds really desperate below with the what he’s written, and he’s fond of using the words winning and losing this debate a lot but it’s a really hollow victory when he’s the only one in the race who believes what he’s written. He keeps talking about the wine that never existed talk about delusional. He also keeps shifting the focus when it suits him; at first he couldn’t stop writing about Monika and Michael as the murders, then it was Bob Levine, Tappy Wright, the Aleem Twins, Dr. Bannister, Sharon Lawrence. Now it’s all about the wine and mgs threshold.
What Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates wrote below is hilarious but it’s also insane.
He makes up his own fake mg numbers for Jimi Hendrix claiming it’s “barbiturate science”. He changes those fake numbers each day and demands that I answer his revolving merry-go-round of fake mg numbers. After I point out to him that his numbers are fake and he keeps changing them, he gets angry and says “I didn’t answer barbiturate science”, “I lost”, and “forfeited the debate”.
Who the hell can give an answer to fake numbers that doesn’t even exist which he changes on a daily basis? He calls that “barbiturate science”. So, he makes up his own “fake science” and makes up his own fake rules for “his debate”. And then he refuses to provide any documentation for his lies and phony science he posts. The guy is a freaking nut.
Hi Jason, The thing with Dr. Buster is that there is no proof for what he’s written because the proof just doesn’t exist because it’s all made up. He will never be able to produce any real documentation because it just can’t be found anywhere. The real evidence came from the autopsy, and later on from Kathy’s investigation. You’re able to reproduce the forensic science because you got it from well researched documents that really exist Buster on the other hand can’t because he is the source of his own fantastical story. I don’t believe a word of what Dr. Buster writes.
BUSTER says: In that credibly moderated room Jason would be made to account for his lying and running from my science that he obviously can’t answer in public…
JASON says: “Your science” is not science, it’s phony milligram numbers you make up and change each day. In a credibly moderated room you would be held accountable for the lies you peddle and would be forced to provide documentation for your phony stories. Would you scamper away like a sniveling coward like you do in this room when you’re asked to produce documents?
BUSTER says: Not only would the material be judged but the poster too and Jason and his idiotic trolling would have been booted from any credible forum long ago…So we wouldn’t even be at this point where I had to answer Jason’s trolling evasions…
JASON says: Yes, your phony stories would be declared fraudulent and then you would be banned like you are from every site and forum you posted on. Buster is saying he is unable to give credible answers for any rebuttal.
BUSTER says: Not only is my estimation of a 3000mg tolerance for Jimi pretty accurate but Jason’s phony demand for exact preciseness is being used to avoid answering the rest of what I wrote…
JASON says: Medicine and science is supposed have exact preciseness, moron. You just don’t guess and make up fake mg numbers in your head like you do. When you go to the doctor does he tell your numbers are “close enough” or “pretty accurate” or does he give you the exact number?
BUSTER says: Jimi still didn’t have enough barbiturate in him to overdose…Jimi had 1800mg total when a person with no tolerance needed 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…We can ignore Jason’s trolling in response to this…He has permanently failed to answer this credible science and forfeits the debate because of it…
JASON says: Says a lying hoaxer who makes up his own fake mg numbers. Forensic medical science in 1970 proved Jimi had a lethal and above toxic 0.7mg barbiturate level which killed him from 9 Vesparax pills. This hoaxer Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates has failed to understand real forensic science trumps his phony made up mg numbers he estimates for Jimi Hendrix.
IVANA says: Hi Jason, The thing with Dr. Buster is that there is no proof for what he’s written because the proof just doesn’t exist because it’s all made up. He will never be able to produce any real documentation because it just can’t be found anywhere. The real evidence came from the autopsy, and later on from Kathy’s investigation. You’re able to reproduce the forensic science because you got it from well researched documents that really exist Buster on the other hand can’t because he is the source of his own fantastical story. I don’t believe a word of what Dr. Buster writes.
JASON says: Hello Ivana,
Exactly, our “mad doctor” the self proclaimed world’s greatest medical expert Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates makes up everything he posts in his crazy head and there is no documented evidence he can ever provide for his phony stories and the lies he peddles. Which is why he cowardly ducked out from “the debate” yesterday claiming a phony “victory” and proclaiming “I lost”. That’s rather hilarious since he changed his phony mg number back to 2000mg again and demanded me to answer for things that doesn’t exist: like his fake revolving merry-go-round mg numbers and the “stomach and lungs full of wine” that never existed. He can never produce one single shred of documented evidence for his lies and phony stories. He tells his fake stories like a narrator like he was actually there. The stories he spins are all full of contradictions and rhetorical questions which are too ridiculous to believe. He changes them whenever he wants to and he is the only hoaxer making these stories up. That’s how you know they are fake and phony. People at other forums and sites don’t believe anything he says either. The only time he ever has agreement is when he uses his fake pseudonyms to agree with himself in the same comment or post. The guy is nuts.
No need to further prove my victory more than you already have Jason…You’ve already lost this debate because you have shown the public that you run from and can’t answer the forensic evidence…When you failed to answer the barbiturate science you lost the debate and calling it phony only makes you look stupid…As I have repeatedly already explained if this was a court of law or credibly moderated debate we would check out my barbiturate science and find out that indeed it is dead accurate…Jason would then be held accountable for his asinine mocking of it instead of giving it a credible response and would be restricted or ejected from the debate for being the idiotic troll he is who is obviously over his head in serious debate and trying to reduce the playing field to a moronic level…
Jason failed to answer the 2000mg Lethal Dose threshold…
Jason failed to answer Dr Crompton’s responsibility to pursue both the stomach and lungs full of wine…
Instead of answering this he tries to switch the subject to documentation…
It’s over Jason…You lost…
Hilarious when a hoaxer proclaims victory on 2 bogus made up stories he invented himself and expects me to answer.
BUSTER says: No need to further prove my victory more than you already have Jason…You’ve already lost this debate because you have shown the public that you run from and can’t answer the forensic evidence…When you failed to answer the barbiturate science you lost the debate and calling it phony only makes you look stupid…As I have repeatedly already explained if this was a court of law or credibly moderated debate we would check out my barbiturate science and find out that indeed it is dead accurate…Jason would then be held accountable for his asinine mocking of it instead of giving it a credible response and would be restricted or ejected from the debate for being the idiotic troll he is who is obviously over his head in serious debate and trying to reduce the playing field to a moronic level…
JASON says: Buster runs away from the 0.7mg above lethal level that proved Jimi died from a lethal overdose. Instead he makes up his own fake numbers trying to pretend Jimi didn’t take enough drugs. He keeps changing his fake numbers each day from 2000 to 3000 up to 4000. That is not “forensic evidence”, that’s called a hoax. Buster has been banned from every forum and site for this type of hoaxing.
BUSTER says: Jason failed to answer the 2000mg Lethal Dose threshold…
JASON says: There’s no such thing as a “2000mg lethal dose threshold”. Milligrams differ in each drug and overdoses varies from person to person. You are a freaking idiot and we enjoy laughing at you.
BUSTER says: Jason failed to answer Dr Crompton’s responsibility to pursue both the stomach and lungs full of wine…
JASON says:. How was it Dr. Crompton’s “responsibility to pursue both the stomach and lungs full of wine” when there is no wine documented on Jimi’s autopsy?
The fake wine claims didn’t start until after, so this debunks your own hoax. Congratulations!
BUSTER says: Instead of answering this he tries to switch the subject to documentation…
JASON says: It’s hard to prove your phony wine hoax when you have no documentation. Eh Chief?
BUSTER says: It’s over Jason…You lost…
JASON says: Whatever you say chief. Keep on hoaxin’.
Hi Jason, Buster could never win this debate no matter what. He could never prove anything and that’s the problem with his arguments. The truth always triumphs in the end and squashed everything Buster said. You can’t argue with someone who fabricates “evidence” except to counter it with real evidence like we both have and keep at it. I say good riddance to him like the other forums have they recognised him for what he is an obnoxious tin foil hatter.
Ivana,
Buster could never win a debate against anyone who refutes him with facts and real documented evidence. All he has is his fake stories and when one is refuted he changes it to another. You’ve seen him change his fake stories many times. Most of the nonsense he comes up with is “somebody told me this” and he uses that fake claim for his “evidence”. That’s why he becomes so frustrated when you challenge him with facts cuz he knows he has no answer. Then he goes into his long winded rants with his usual debate style of attacking you, demanding you to be censored, claiming you can’t answer his good evidence, changing stories on you etc.
We both know why he wanted us banned cuz we challenged his nonsense, exposed his hoax as a fraud, and he lost his “credibility” that he thought he had as a trolling hoaxer narrator pushing his hoax. Everything he demands you to answer he calls “his evidence”, “his science” and rightly so cuz he made it up himself. He claims a “murder” and a “homicide” but will never name his phony killer.
Ridiculous how Buster pushes this hoax of “wine” when all the doctors at St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed on 9/18/70 that Jimi died from a drug overdose.
Buster can celebrate today the 1992 anniversary of Fraud Bannister’s (The Grandfather of Wine) invention of the fake wine claim with a glass of phony wine.
Drink up Buster! You can celebrate your hero and your phony “victory” all in the same day!
The reason I debated the obvious sleazy troll Jason is because I wanted to prove I can beat any and all comers with the evidence…My record of never being defeated in 11 years of arguing this on the internet stands…Jason was confronted with two main pieces of evidence (the 2000mg Lethal Dose threshold and Dr Crompton’s lungs full of fluid) and badly failed to answer them in public…According to all known debate rules he loses and the harder he blathers troll talk in response the harder I win…I have never been beaten by anyone in 11 years and that record stands…I can even beat the demented ones like Jason…Mockery trolls really shouldn’t get involved in this subject and it speaks poorly for the moderation that they are allowed to…
Instead of proving his fake stories with real documented evidence Buster scampers away. LOL.
BUSTER says: The reason I debated the obvious sleazy troll Jason is because I wanted to prove I can beat any and all comers with the evidence…My record of never being defeated in 11 years of arguing this on the internet stands…
JASON says: LMAO. You’ve lost to everybody you tried to argue with cuz you make up lies and that automatically disqualifies you.
BUSTER says: Jason was confronted with two main pieces of evidence (the 2000mg Lethal Dose threshold and Dr Crompton’s lungs full of fluid) and badly failed to answer them in public…
JASON says: 2 made up lies gets you a phony victory….if life were only that simple.
There’s no such thing as a “2000mg overdose threshold” since an overdose varies from person to person. Ask any doctor in the world. Another b.s. lie of yours.
No wine was ever detected in the fluid, and the fluid was on record in the autopsy since 1970. Trying to claim phony wine makes you a loser.
BUSTER says: According to all known debate rules he loses and the harder he blathers troll talk in response the harder I win…I have never been beaten by anyone in 11 years and that record stands…I can even beat the demented ones like Jason…Mockery trolls really shouldn’t get involved in this subject and it speaks poorly for the moderation that they are allowed to…
JASON says: Fake bravado from a hoaxer is all he can do on the internet. Buster makes up his own fake debate rules, as well as his fake stories of wine, along with phony evidence, and now fake victories. Kudos to you sir, take a bow, and have a glass of phony wine with Fraud Bannister on your Fake Wine Claim Anniversary
Deliberately throwing a spanner in the works for 11 years trying to get rid of the real evidence and supplant it with own dubious claims. The only one running in your race because no one wants to run with you.
Hi Ivana,
There’s a reason St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose after he was brought in dead on arrival. They determined it right off the bat cuz it was obvious and science detected it.
Dr. Teare and Dr. Thurston were the two best men in their field and Jimi went through a full forensic analysis of his body. The analysis already determined the amount of drugs and toxicity Jimi had in his body. Those numbers were documented and put down officially on record. These numbers cannot be disputed. Jimi had an above toxic 0.7mg barbiturate level in his body from 9 Vesparax pills which he also took a powerful amphetamine and was over the legal alcohol limit. No phony wine was ever detected in the fluid and that results from difficulty in breathing and an abnormal heartbeat which is an effect from an overdose. All this documented evidence is on record and came directly from Hendrix’s body.
Jokers decades later trying to make up fake claims that Jimi needed X amount of drugs to die is asinine. Anybody can make up false claims and since they have no evidence they never get anywhere. Real forensic science already proved Jimi died from a lethal amount of barbiturates that killed him. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose and made it offical on his death day cuz they knew it right off the bat cuz it was obvious.
Hi Jason, Who would be dumb enough to take Buster’s word over that of the real expects like Dr. Teare, Dr Thurston and Dr. Crompton? To think Kathy’s investigation confirmed what happened to Jimi way back in 1970 that he died of a lethal overdose of barbiturates. It didn’t uncover a sinister murder plot by Monika and Michael Jeffrey or that Jimi was waterboarded to death with red wine. In fact wine was never even mentioned. Kathy wanted to determine exactly what happened to Jimi because Monika kept changing her story about the time she woke up. Dr. Crompton reiterated Dr. Teare’s findings to Kathy about how Jimi died and it still was precisely as the autopsy report revealed in 1970.
Hello Ivana,
Buster makes up his own fake lies and calls it evidence. Nobody would take the lying words of an internet hoaxer over world famous doctors.
I’ve clearly documented how Buster lies, makes up fake claims, and changes them when he wants to..Now that Buster is forced to produce documents and real evidence for his lies of phony wine, he backs out of the debate like a sniveling coward cuz he has no real evidence to produce. Wine never existed.
No imaginary wine was ever found in Jimi Hendrix nor was it ever documented on any official report. The reason for that is there was never any wine to report in 1970. The fake wine claim came from Fraud Bannister in 1992 which is why he can never produce documents for the phony wine he claims. Fraud Bannister lost his medical license for fraudulent conduct.
Buster wants to claim fluid is wine but has no evidence to ever prove, it’s only his hoaxing words and he demands that you believe it.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose on 9/18/70, they never said anything about wine cuz it didn’t exist.
Buster will eventually run out of steam if he hasn’t already. He’ll fade away altogether. You can’t keep going with falsified information the truth comes out in the long run. We both know our stuff really well because it’s come from reliable and reputable sources. Buster on the other hand used Bannister and Wright mostly as his main sources along with some others but it was all fake and phony and he’s been riding on their coattails for years.
Buster has fizzled out for a while now. You could see it in his writings. They were defensive and weak. He was making too many mistakes with his fake stories and had to keep changing them. He became tired and it showed. How far can he go to keep making up new lies without having any evidence to produce? He backed out and ran when he was forced to provide real information and documents for his bogus tales. He had nothing to show since he knows it’s all made up. That’s what trolls and hoaxers do when they are exposed. They run away and leave. We all know that and Buster isn’t fooling anybody.
Buster uses Bannister religiously and creates his hoax around his imaginary wine. Then Buster just claims “fluid is wine” but no wine was ever found in any fluid in Jimi Hendrix. So that false claim is easily debunked. Buster has mostly moved away from Wright now and creates his own fake versions like the “London Thugs” who happened to pass by. LOL
Here’s a quote from an article on Dr. Bob Brown. Brown was the first doctor to view a dead Jimi Hendrix at St. Mary Abbots Hospital. Dr. Brown debunks the phony wine claim cuz he doesn’t even mention anything about wine. He also debunks the phony “procedure” claim as well refuting Fraud Bannister. Brown clearly states “but there was nothing I could do for him,” and since there was nothing Brown could do for him that means no phony “procedures” were ever performed. Which is why no documentation of any of these phony “procedures” exist cuz it never happened and was made up in January 1992 by Fraud Bannister. This is just another nail in the coffin for this phony wine hoax.
“I did locum jobs at five or six different little hospitals while I was there. One of them was St. Mary Abbots Hospital, and I was working there when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead. Straight away, I knew who he was, but there was nothing I could do for him. There were a lot of people weeping and much commotion. Poor Jimi.” – Doctor Bob Brown
Hi Jason, Our dear Dr.Yates has shifted the focus back onto the wine instead of mgs of barbiturates. We can’t go past the fact that the high concentrated toxic level of barbiturate in Jimi’s liver caused damage to it. But this isn’t serious enough for our Dr. Yates he’s got to invent a murder on top of that. This guy is just beyond belief and crazy to boot.
Hi Ivana,
The “mad doctor” Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates needs to push his phony wine claim cuz real forensic science debunks his hoax. The problem for him there was never any wine and he can’t produce any evidence of it.
He ignores real science for his phony claims. He is nuts.
Jason is obviously shaken from my trouncing him on the forensics…He posted that a full analysis was done on Jimi at St Mary’s…What a nut…Jimi was not forensically analyzed until monday 3 days later at his autopsy…So St Mary’s could give no determination on the cause until the autopsy formally confirmed what was in Jimi…Jason is only proving my case that he’s a trolling idiot who is his best own refuter…
Jason knows he is full of it so he once again resorts to trolling semantics by saying Jimi was “above toxic”…That means nothing and it is just Jason’s obnoxious trolling way of avoiding admitting that he failed to answer the barbiturate science…You can’t input less than a Lethal Dose on the ingestion end and come up with more than a Lethal Dose on the back end…That’s what Jason is trying to do and he lost the debate because of his obvious inability to answer for it…No matter how many times Jason ignores science and lies, he’s not going to make that .7mg blood reading an overdose like he’s desperately trying to do…
Jason continues to say the amphetamine was the straw that broke the camel’s back but the reason no medical expert ever said that was because they knew a stimulant would be part of the treatment for such a dose of barbiturates and would tip the scale in favor of Jimi…Jason is a sick pup so he’ll ignore this and keep trolling that the speed added to the toxic stew and killed Jimi…
Jason once again ignores everything that has been written for half a year now and enters that Jimi’s blood alcohol level was above the legal driving limit…That of course is a lie and Jason knows it…The measured blood alcohol content at Jimi’s autopsy was 5mg, which is a trace amount…
Jason is lying because Dr Bannister detected at least 5 bottles of wine in the fluid he and Dr Siefert removed from Jimi’s lungs and stomach…It is obvious that the wine Dr Siefert said Jimi was covered in was wine spilled while pouring it down Jimi’s throat…Just the disinterest of the British authorities in this otherwise highly incriminating evidence is proof alone…It is their job to investigate such serious signs of intrigue and not avoid them…
Jason’s moronic contempt for barbiturate forensic science disqualifies him from serious consideration and once again does the best job of anyone of making my case…Jason is obviously a troll who is over his head in forensic argument who is trying to reduce the discussion to his moronic contemptuous level…Jason is obviously struggling with his awareness of his total inability to answer the credible drug science I posted…Anyone who writes “Jokers decades later trying to make up fake claims that Jimi needed X amount of drugs to die is asinine” is a person who should not be allowed to post amongst credible analyzers or insult their intelligence…
Dr. Quack just loves the sound of his own voice spewing out nonsense wherever and whenever he can. Just where did these five bottles of wine appear from since doctors cannot perform invasive procedures on DOA and never on someone like Jimi who the doctors identified as having been dead for a few hours. Where exactly are you getting your information from? No one ever suggested that Jimi was murdered or that the wine was solely responsible for his death. You’re the only one making this assessment. You deliberately focus on the details that appeal to you and ignore others the blood alcohol level being one example when Jimi’s urine alcohol content was 46ml, the fluid in Jimi’s lungs was caused by the overdose of barbiturates only you say it was wine. Why would The British authorities spend their time investigating a murder that never took place. They had the autopsy report of the well respected and experienced Dr. Teare that’s all they needed. You are assuming that Jimi was murdered but the evidence just doesn’t back your claim. You’re distorting the information to suit you claims.
Dr. Albert Doyle Yates says a 0.7mg above toxic level “means nothing”.
He says Jimi “didn’t have enough pills”. 9 Vesparax pills caused Jimi to die with a 0.7mg above lethal reading. Forensic science determined that. Buster denies forensic science and adds his fake numbers instead.
Then he lies about the findings that Jimi’s alcohol content was enough to fail a breathalyzer test and goes back to his phony “wine removal” scenario that never happened.
Where are the documents of this phony “wine removal”?
*crickets*
“I did locum jobs at five or six different little hospitals while I was there. One of them was St. Mary Abbots Hospital, and I was working there when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead. Straight away, I knew who he was, but there was nothing I could do for him. There were a lot of people weeping and much commotion. Poor Jimi.” – Doctor Bob Brown
Dr. Bob Brown puts another nail in the phony wine hoax coffin sealing it air tight. Brown never said one word about Jimi being “covered in any wine”. Dr. Bob Brown clearly states “there was nothing I could do for him”. Bob Brown did not say Jimi was taken back and was worked on for X amount of time and had X done for him. Dr. Bob Brown confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival and that nothing could be done for him. This clearly means there was no phony “wine removal” as well cuz Brown would have said so if it were true. What does Dr. Bob Brown say? Brown said “There was nothing I could do for him”. That means nothing was ever done for Jimi Hendrix except to ship him off to the morgue and that was reported and confirmed in the press on 9/18/70. Not one document exists of a phony “wine removal”. That’s cuz no phony “wine removal” ever took place. Bob Brown makes that perfectly clear in his statement when he said “There was nothing I could do for Jimi Hendrix.” Jimi was a dead several hour corpse so there is nothing that can be done for him. Hospitals don’t perform “work” on a long dead corpse. Bob Brown confirmed that in his statement when he said “there was nothing I could do for him”.
Dr. Siefert also confirmed that as well, when he stated that Jimi was only hooked up to the monitor and it was flat showing he was already dead. He pounded Jimi’s heart a couple of times as formality and that was it. Dr. Siefert never once spoke of these phony “procedures” either. There were no phony procedures cuz there is nothing you can do for a dead 7 1/2 hour drug overdose victim. So, we have 2 doctors corroborating each other that nothing was done for Jimi Hendrix. And then we have Fraud Bannister who was convicted for 3 counts of fraud losing his medical license for life telling tales of phony wine tales pretending to save a dead 7 1/2 hour corpse. He is a fraud through and through and he can never prove his lies cuz no documents of any phony procedures exist. That means nothing was done for Jimi Hendrix just like both doctors Siefert and Brown confirmed. 2 doctors against 1 fraud doctor who has no documents or evidence of his phony wine proves this to be a hoax. That ends this bogus hoax even more than it already has been.
Dr. Brown clarified for us that there were a “lot of people weeping” when Jimi was brought in. This clearly means they were crying already knowing Jimi was dead further proving no phony “treatments” ever took place.
Dr. Brown does not go into detail about any phony “treatments” by Fraud Bannister. That’s cuz there was never any “treatments” ever performed. Not a single document ever exists of these fake “treatments”. These fake “treatment” stories are perpetrated by jokers, hoaxers, trolls, and frauds spinning a phony tale. But they are always defeated by documented evidence. These jokers have no documented evidence to prove, it’s always a phony tale narrated like they were there in person giving an eye witness account. That’s cuz they are lying telling you a phony tale. It is a hoax.
There was no “5 bottles of wine” either. That is another made up phony tale cuz no documents exists of any measurements of “5 bottles”. Does Dr. Brown ever talk about these phony “5 bottles”? Of course not. Dr. Brown said “there was nothing I could do for Jimi Hendrix”. Since nothing could be done for Jimi that means no phony “5 bottles exist”. Does Dr. Brown ever say “Jimi was covered in wine”? Of course not. He never was “covered in wine” cuz both ambulance men said he was only covered in vomit. Forensic analysis of Jimi’s body never detected any wine on him at the autopsy. Jimi went through a full forensic analysis of his entire body. There was no phony “wine drowning” cuz there was no massive wine ever detected inside his body nor was there any wine in the fluid. Wine does not just disappear if you are drowned fully inside your body. It soaks through all the tissues, the stomach lining and the lungs. Dr. Teare found no massive wine during microscopic analysis of Jimi’s body. There were no signs of a “forced wine drowning” which would easily be detected if there was. That’s why forensic science always trumps phony claims from clowns who know nothing about science and forensics. Fraud Bannister thought he could get away with his lie but was exposed as more of a fraud and is why nobody in the medical profession has anything to do with him.
Dr. Bob Brown was part of the hospital staff that issued Jimi’s official death statement to the press on 9/18/70. St. Mary Abbots Hospital would not sign off on issuing a false report ruining their credibility around the world on a world famous musician. They had to get it right and they did. St. Mary Abbots had to issue a correct statement to the world on Jimi’s death. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed that Jimi died from a drug overdose. They never said one word about any imaginary wine covering Jimi, fake “wine removals”, or anything about an alcohol related death. That’s cuz there was no imaginary wine except for the wine Jimi had on his own that registered an above legal limit of alcohol that interacted with this massive overdose that further increased the intensity of the pills. Alcohol infuses barbiturates and Jimi took 18 times the normal dose which resulted in an above lethal 0.7mg toxic reading that was found in his system. Forenisc medical science proved this and 0.7mg is an above lethal number when 0.5 is the base lethal toxic number. So, no phony “wine removal” or Jimi being “covered in wine” was ever documented anywhere at St. Mary Abbots Hospital. No phony “wine removal” or Jimi being “covered in wine” was never officially stated in the St. Mary Abbots Hospital press statement. If Jimi had a phony “wine removal” and was “covered in wine” they would have said so in their press statement. They only said Jimi died from a drug overdose and were waiting the results from the autopsy that later confirmed what they officially stated to the press. These fake wine claims started in January of 1992 which is why in 1970 you never hear of wine cuz there never was any wine. The wine hoax didn’t start until 1992 and they are all fake after the fact claims. That’s why these jokers can’t produce any documentation for their hoax. You can’t get documents for something that never happened almost 50 years ago when they are making it up now. It never happened and all they can spin are phony tales.
There’s a reason St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose after he was brought in dead on arrival. They determined it right off the bat cuz it was obvious and science detected it before the autopsy. Ambulance man John Saua scooped up a sample of Jimi’s vomit that proved it was drugs and there was no massive wine in it. Forensic analysis of the blankets colllected by the coroner’s officer showed drugs as well and so did the autopsy. No wine was detected on the blankets, on the body of Jimi Hendrix, or inside his body. Wine was never even in play in 1970. It’s a fake post 1992 hoax. No phony wine drowning ever happened. And if these wine clowns still wants to snivel for their imaginary wine? Well, all I have to say is show me the documents. But they can’t, since none exist, further proving their phony hoax to be debunked. They can always cry for a “cover up” though, but they have no evidence for that either. Just more phony tales that is made up since all the real forensic science and documents will forever defeat their failed hoax.
Well done, Jason. The autopsy revealed the toxic level of barbiturates not the wine killed Jimi. The wine didn’t destroy his liver the barbiturates did. The barbiturates caused Jimi to choke on his own vomit the wine didn’t. So it’s a bit dumb for our friend to keep blaming the wine for Jimi’s death when it had nothing at all to do with Jimi’s death.
“Our friend” has no evidence of his wine which is why he is running away now that he’s forced to show documents.
Buster can’t produce documents when he is only inventing phony stories in his crazy head.
I clearly remember the day Jimi’s death was announced back in 1970. It was always assumed that Jimi died of an overdose of drugs in this case prescription medication. No one ever said that Jimi was murdered or ever imagined such a thing occurring. The journalists of the day who covered Jimi’s death never reported or wrote about any hint of foul play involved in his demise. Fast forward a few decades later and we have a number of books claiming Jimi was murdered by none other than his manager Michael Jeffrey and his then girlfriend Monika Dannemann who Jimi met in 1969 and then again in 1970 a few days before he actually died. The official autopsy report stated that Jimi died as a consequence of taking too many barbiturates nine in total a lethal dose since half a tablet is enough to knock anyone out. No official investigation could determine that Jimi was murdered since the Vesparax was the only substance that was pinpointed as actually causing Jimi’s death. The Hendrix Family believed that Jimi’s death was an accident with no-one to blame. Those dumb books that suggest Jimi was murdered are only speculative and not evidence since no actual evidence has ever been produced.
Fraud Bannister started the fake wine claim in 1992 and hoaxers like Buster came along and embellished more fake stories to add to this debunked conspiracy.
The fact no wine was found, documented, or spoken about in 1970 proves this to be only phony post 1992 after the fact claims.
Hi Ivana,
So, St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from drug overdose and they never said one word about any imaginary wine. That means there was no wine on 9/18/70 proving these fake wine stories are all a post 1992 hoax.
Wouldn’t you think with all this massive gallons of “drowning wine” this joker tries to claim that the hospital would have mentioned it during their press statement of Jimi’s death? Bob Brown never saw any wine either. Neither did the ambulance men or the police. So, how can there be this “massive wine drowning” when there was no wine at the death scene? Maybe the “London thugs” drank it all before they got to the flat. LOL.
Here’s an excerpt from Kathy’s Book that gets overlooked but also destroys this phony wine hoax.
From the book “Through Gypsy Eyes” by Kathy Etchingham:
“What the policemen should have done if they found a dead body was call in the CID, but as far as they were concerned this was just another dead junkie in Notting Hill. Had Jimi been in the Cumberland Hotel where everyone knew who he was, it would have been a different story.”
“Another dead junkie in Notting Hill” it says. Well, a junkie is referring to a person who uses drugs, not alcohol. So, the police had a very good look at the death scene and saw nothing alcohol related or this phony “wine drowning scene” that this joker was trying to call a “homicide”. The death scene witnessed by professional police officers didn’t look like a crime scene with gallons of phony wine all over the place. It was a routine scene from a drug overdose that they were accustomed to which is why they didn’t want to be bothered filling out paperwork. The police automatically said a “junkie” and knew it was drug related and John Saua said it was a drug overdose when he first saw the scene himself. These men saw a lot of drug overdose scenes cuz they were common in Notting Hill in 1970 and this was routine for them.
So, they knew it was an overdose right off the bat, and then St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed it was a drug overdose to the world shortly after, and the autopsy officially proved it. It perfectly dovetails. So, there you go….only more evidence of drugs and still no imaginary wine that can never be found. This was the death scene. Where’s all the gallons of “pure red wine” this hoaxer said was “splashed all around” and “drowned” Jimi in? Nowhere to be found. That’s why no documentation of phony wine exists, only bogus post 1992 hoaxing tales invented by The Grandfather of Wine, Fraud Bannister.
Hi Jason, Our friend the joker just won’t let go of this murder scene no matter what even though Jimi’s death points to an overdose. Funny how 5 bottles of wine got into Jimi when they were supposedly splashed everywhere and all over him. I don’t think alcohol would have caused liver damage in that short amount of time but Dr.Teare identified the barbiturates as being solely responsible for destroying Jimi’s liver. It’s pretty oblivious that the barbiturates caused Jimi’s death as reiterated by Dr. Crompton to Kathy.
So, then Buster should claim 10 bottles since the 5 were “splashed” all over that not a soul witnessed. LOL
Right, the liver damage were caused by the 9 Vesparax and that was forensically analyzed.
The whole point is no wine was ever mentioned by Reg Jones when Kathy spoke to him. The police found no wine either on 9/18/70 when they called him a “junkie”. This takes care of the phony wine hoax.
Dr. Bob Brown never said he saw wine on Jimi and he saw him first. Brown never spoke of any phony procedures either.
St Mary Abbots Hospital said Jimi died from a drug overdose. Not a word about wine and no documents either.
Jason is, of course, an idiot and if he correctly interpreted Kathy’s quote above its true context, that Kathy was saying more proper evaluation of the death scene would have been done if Jimi had died at the Cumberland, would have been explained…The context Kathy was expressing was that a proper evaluation of the death scene and the death itself wasn’t done…
Jason is just rehashing his original lies so there’s no point in responding…When Dr Siefert confirmed in his 1990’s video interview that “Jimi was covered in red wine” he proved that the wine Dr Bannister witnessed was corroborated…We have proven our case because once Dr Thurston (the head of the London Coroner’s Office) admitted Jimi’s stomach was full of wine and Dr Crompton admitted Jmi’s lungs were full of fluid we have evidence of malfeasance on the part of the British authorities and proof of a cover-up…It was their obligation to further investigate that forensic evidence and they did the opposite, which is proof of a cover-up…The wine was covered-up and was then purposely not included in the forensic evidence and cause of death at the Inquest…
Worst case scenario again. What Kathy meant was that Jimi would have received the rock star treatment at the Cumberland since he was registered there as a guest and easily identifiable since he occupied the room 507/508. As the ambulance officers said there was no one about at the Samarkand as Monika fled but the death scene was pretty recognisable as an overdose. The room that Jimi occupied at the Cumberland is now a permanent memorial to him. No one else ever hinted that Jimi was murdered only you.
BUSTER says: Jason is, of course, an idiot and if he correctly interpreted Kathy’s quote above its true context, that Kathy was saying more proper evaluation of the death scene would have been done if Jimi had died at the Cumberland, would have been explained…The context Kathy was expressing was that a proper evaluation of the death scene and the death itself wasn’t done…
JASON says: An investigation should have been done, but it wasn’t cuz the police had no idea that it was Jimi Hendrix. The police assumed it was a dead “junkie” and didn’t want to fill out paperwork. The point is there was no wine at the death scene like you lied about. The police and the ambulance men never saw any wine and that debunks your hoax.,
BUSTER says: Jason is just rehashing his original lies so there’s no point in responding…When Dr Siefert confirmed in his 1990’s video interview that “Jimi was covered in red wine” he proved that the wine Dr Bannister witnessed was corroborated…We have proven our case because once Dr Thurston (the head of the London Coroner’s Office) admitted Jimi’s stomach was full of wine and Dr Crompton admitted Jmi’s lungs were full of fluid we have evidence of malfeasance on the part of the British authorities and proof of a cover-up…It was their obligation to further investigate that forensic evidence and they did the opposite, which is proof of a cover-up…The wine was covered-up and was then purposely not included in the forensic evidence and cause of death at the Inquest…
JASON says: Buster the clown continues to make up his debunked fake lies of wine.
I just posted a excerpt from Kathy’s book where no wine was ever witnessed by anybody at the death scene. That ends this wine hoax.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital said Jimi died from a drug overdose. Not one word about wine.
Dr. Bob Brown witnessed no wine on Jimi Hendrix
Dr. Siefert said later said he saw no wine on Jimi.
Forensic analysis of Jimi’s body detected no wine.
Dr. Thurston never said one word about wine and that is a total lie.
Buster the clown is claiming Thurston was in on a “cover up”. So, Thurston wouldn’t be blabbing about “wine” exposing the “cover up” to a reporter. That’s how stupid these bogus stories are.
Buster has no evidence for anything he says. Just fake stories of wine that doesn’t exist.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is back on call desperately trying to deny real forensic science as he looks even more like an idiot trying to rehash his debunked Hoaxing Greatest Hits. Just like the phony “5 phony bottles of wine” that he made up himself. No wine was ever documented at St. Mary Abbots Hospital and the hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose. Who is going to believe this joker when all he can offer is his lying hoaxing words as he narrates his fake stories? Ask Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates for documents. He’ll crap his pants and then scamper away cuz he is a hoaxer who makes this nonsense up himself.
BUSTER says: Jason is obviously shaken from my trouncing him on the forensics…He posted that a full analysis was done on Jimi at St Mary’s…What a nut…Jimi was not forensically analyzed until monday 3 days later at his autopsy…So St Mary’s could give no determination on the cause until the autopsy formally confirmed what was in Jimi…Jason is only proving my case that he’s a trolling idiot who is his best own refuter…
JASON says: Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates never had a case and is trounced by whoever he tries to argue with cuz everything he says is total bullshit.
BUSTER says: Jason knows he is full of it so he once again resorts to trolling semantics by saying Jimi was “above toxic”…That means nothing and it is just Jason’s obnoxious trolling way of avoiding admitting that he failed to answer the barbiturate science…
JASON says: It means nothing doctor? What the hell are you talking about? What did they teach you at The Three Stooges School of Medicine? Not very much I’m afraid.
Above toxic means everything doctor. Why don’t you know that? A 0.7mg reading is above the lethal level which means it’s a lethal overdose and you will die. That’s what happened to Jimi Hendrix. Forensic medical science proved it since it was documented from Jimi’s autopsy. Barbiturate science revealed a lethal 0.7mg reading from 9 Vesparax pills. This has been part of history since 1970. Crompton confirmed it to Kathy Etchingham after reading Jimi’s autopsy report and this is just another nail in your hoaxing coffin.
BUSTER says: You can’t input less than a Lethal Dose on the ingestion end and come up with more than a Lethal Dose on the back end…That’s what Jason is trying to do and he lost the debate because of his obvious inability to answer for it…No matter how many times Jason ignores science and lies, he’s not going to make that .7mg blood reading an overdose like he’s desperately trying to do…
JASON says: 9 Vesparax pills is an above lethal dose, moron. It returned a 0.7mg above lethal reading. That is barbiturate science. You’re being desperate trying to deny forensic science and you look like a total clown.
BUSTER says: Jason continues to say the amphetamine was the straw that broke the camel’s back but the reason no medical expert ever said that was because they knew a stimulant would be part of the treatment for such a dose of barbiturates and would tip the scale in favor of Jimi…Jason is a sick pup so he’ll ignore this and keep trolling that the speed added to the toxic stew and killed Jimi…
JASON says: “Tip the scale” he says. What an idiot. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is a total moron and has no knowledge about drugs, dosages, and the interactions they cause. Barbiturate drugs are not supposed to be mixed, they are hepatic enzyme inducers. That means that they will induce and increase the metabolism of other drugs. Did you not know that doctor? Vesparax was a combination drug containing 3 key components that were extremely powerful. You can’t mix a powerful upper and then overdose on 9 extremely powerful downers when Jimi was over the legal alcohol limit. That’s how it got to the 0.7mg above lethal level. Pathetic how you deny real forensic science that’s been in the books for nearly 50 years.
BUSTER says: Jason once again ignores everything that has been written for half a year now and enters that Jimi’s blood alcohol level was above the legal driving limit…That of course is a lie and Jason knows it…The measured blood alcohol content at Jimi’s autopsy was 5mg, which is a trace amount…
JASON says: Sorry doctor, that is not a lie. Dr. Teare confirmed that Jimi was above the legal limit and his blood alcohol content was enough to fail a breathalyzer test. You sure don’t know the facts do you? Your phony claims aren’t going to work against documented evidence that will always refute you.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying because Dr Bannister detected at least 5 bottles of wine in the fluid he and Dr Siefert removed from Jimi’s lungs and stomach…It is obvious that the wine Dr Siefert said Jimi was covered in was wine spilled while pouring it down Jimi’s throat…Just the disinterest of the British authorities in this otherwise highly incriminating evidence is proof alone…It is their job to investigate such serious signs of intrigue and not avoid them…
JASON says: Dragging Dr. Siefert again into your phony “wine removal” plot? This is a newer phony story of yours since you never involved Siefert before, it was only Fraud Bannister you claimed. You’re the one who is lying. You made up the phony “5 bottles of wine” claim yourself. Nobody has ever talked about 5 bottles except for you. You started out with 3, then went to 4, and now 5. This is a scam. You have no documented evidence of the phony 5 bottles. Dr. Bob Brown saw no wine on Jimi and neither did the ambulance men or the police. Dr. Siefert later said he saw no wine on Jimi. But guess what? Forenisc analysis during the autopsy detected no wine on Jimi or inside him. Got some documents to prove your phony wine doctor? Documents or it didn’t happen.
BUSTER says: Jason’s moronic contempt for barbiturate forensic science disqualifies him from serious consideration and once again does the best job of anyone of making my case…Jason is obviously a troll who is over his head in forensic argument who is trying to reduce the discussion to his moronic contemptuous level…Jason is obviously struggling with his awareness of his total inability to answer the credible drug science I posted…Anyone who writes “Jokers decades later trying to make up fake claims that Jimi needed X amount of drugs to die is asinine” is a person who should not be allowed to post amongst credible analyzers or insult their intelligence…
JASON says: Get a new script doctor. This one is old and should be retired by now. We all know you have no case and you never did. You’re a long time internet hoaxer always making up your fake stories and now your own phony mg numbers calling it “science”.
All you can pathetically do is deny, deny, deny and say “Jimi didn’t have enough drugs” as you hilariously try to increase the total to make it look like he could tolerate more drugs. That is not science that is a hoax. And you’ve been thoroughly debunked.
Then when every piece of evidence refutes you, we hear your bogus “cover up” claim that you made up yourself. You rely on the same script and phony stories and can never produce any evidence. That’s why your hoax will always be shown to be a farce.
0.7mg is an above lethal dose from 9 Vesparax pills and you can never overturn the facts cuz that was found in Jimi’s body and then documented. Where are your documents Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates? Your phony narrated stories is not evidence, documents, or science…it’s called a hoax.
All Dr. Yates offers is speculation not fact or evidence going on for 11 years now under various pseudonyms in order to disguise his real identity and to make it look as if he has supporters. He has two opponents on this thread and no supporters here or on any of the other threads he posts on. In fact he has been thrown off other threads for posting what he calls facts but which are in reality anything but. The pathetic lies he has spun about Jimi’s death to make it look like a murder when all of the evidence points to accidental death by a high dosage of barbiturates, and drawing innocent people into his web of deceit. Dr. Yates is only a serial obnoxious hoaxer who infiltrates certain threads in order to throw a spanner in the works and steer the argument towards his direction hoping someone will buy into what he’s saying. Don’t be fooled.
BUSTER says: When Dr Siefert confirmed in his 1990’s video interview that “Jimi was covered in red wine” he proved that the wine Dr Bannister witnessed was corroborated…
JASON says: Siefert later said there was no wine. No wine was witnessed at the death scene. Dr. Bob Brown witnessed no wine at the hospital. No hospital documents exists of this wine. No wine was detected at Jimi’s autopsy. No wine exists and you have nothing to prove except for your own hoaxing words.
BUSTER says: We have proven our case because once Dr Thurston (the head of the London Coroner’s Office) admitted Jimi’s stomach was full of wine and Dr Crompton admitted Jmi’s lungs were full of fluid we have evidence of malfeasance on the part of the British authorities and proof of a cover-up…
JASON says: You have no case and this is your own made up hoax. This is the same script you recite for your debunked 11 year hoax.
Dr. Thurston never spoke about any wine. This lie came out of Sharon Lawrence’s fiction book who said Jimi committed suicide on 9 pills. So she just contradicted herself and you repeat her lie. A phony claim from her is not evidence.
Since 1970 it was documented on Jimi’s autopsy that Jimi had 400ml of fluid in his left chest. Nowhere on the autopsy does it say Jimi had “lungs full of fluid” or that “the fluid was wine” or that wine was detected in his body. No wine is documented anywhere on any report.
BUSTER says: It was their obligation to further investigate that forensic evidence and they did the opposite, which is proof of a cover-up…The wine was covered-up and was then purposely not included in the forensic evidence and cause of death at the Inquest…
JASON says: Forensic evidence in 1970 proved Jimi Hendrix died from a lethal 9 pill Vesparax overdose that returned a 0.7mg above lethal reading in his body. Famous doctors were not involved in any “cover up” as you lie about.
No wine ever existed in 1970 and then in January of 1992 Fraud Bannister made up his phony wine claim. That’s why you only have after the fact 1992 phony wine clams with no evidence you can produce.
Hi Jason, Really important point about the amount of fluid in Jimi’s chest measuring 400ml because this would only amount to half a bottle which I think would be consistent with an overdose producing this amount of fluid. It would be impossible,I think, for the lungs to absorb five bottles worth of wine; Jimi would have been spewing out litres of red wine and nothing else. Surely, Dr. Teare wouldn’t have missed that or filled out his report based on assumptions; he would have been 100 per cent certain of what he was dealing with in Jimi’s case-an overdose of barbiturates.
Hi Ivana,
Yes that would be, and the amount of fluid would fall right in line from the effects from an overdose.
Another point I made before, was that if someone was pouring bottles of wine down Jimi’s throat then there would have been signs of a drowning and there never was during the autopsy. No massive amounts of wine was found inside his body either.
Also, there would be no vomiting cuz this joker was saying they were drowning Jimi to “murder” him. So, Jimi would drown to death quickly on the wine since his phony claim is Jimi was unconscious from the pills. The rest of the phony claim was Jimi was filled full of pure wine from his stomach up to his mouth. The fact that the ambulance and police witnessed only vomit and Teare found vomit during the autopsy debunks the wine myth and the phony wine removal.
Our “mad doctor” Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates sure fails the grade here not knowing anything about toxicity, barbiturates, and Jimi Hendrix history. And Buster claims to be a forensic specialist and a big Jimi Hendrix buff.
BUSTER says: Jason is obviously desperate to fish misquotes from dubious sources who were involved in a cover-up when they made those statements…
JASON says: Are you saying the Associated Press was involved in a “cover up”?
BUSTER says: However if we slow it down and investigate those quotes more carefully we will see that .5mg “toxic” means nothing and is just like saying drinking a six pack of beer is “toxic”…
JASON says: Are you saying 0.5mg is not toxic? Jimi’s level was 0.7mg btw. You can’t compare a six pack to 9 Vesparax doctor. Trying to downgrade that low for your debuked hoax? Wow!
BUSTER says: The true context of those quotes from Crompton is they came after he had said too much and was trying to compensate by covering-up…
JASON says: Learn your Hendrix history chief. The Associated Press reported this back in 1970. Were you there to know all the juicy details? Is this why you can narrate this phony story?
BUSTER says: He was trying too hard to make a non-lethal blood level lethal and it is evidence of the cover-up…
JASON says: How could Dr. Crompton do that when the lethal 0.7mg reading was documented since 1970? He was reading a 20 year old autopsy report that Kathy handed to him with the numbers already on it. How could he pull off a “cover up” with toxic mg numbers documented since 1970? You were there to know all this?
BUSTER says: As is Jason’s quoting of second-hand media sources saying Jimi died of barbiturate “poisoning”…Jason has already been told that nowhere did any official legal/medical document say Jimi died of lethal barbiturate poisoning…
JASON says: A 0.7mg above lethal reading is barbiturate poisoning doctor. Anything toxic is poisoning. Didn’t you learn that at The Three Stooges School of Medicine? Dr. Teare confirmed to the Associated Press that it was barbiturate poisoning. That isn’t second hand sources chief, that’s straight from the horse’s mouth which is Dr. Teare himself. You relish posting second hand sources, that’s where your fake info comes from. Like Sharon Lawrence with the bogus Thurston phony wine quote that you religiously parrot.
BUSTER says: Those autopsy sheets clearly said “Intoxication” in order to make clear Jimi did not have a fatal “poisoning” level that was indicated by the nomenclature…
JASON says: Intoxication causes poisoning doctor since it’s an overdose. What were you doing during the lectures not to know this stuff? 0.7mg is clearly documented in Jimi’s autopsy to show lethal poisoning. Aren’t you supposed to be “the foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix”? Yet, you don’t know any of this important medical data.
BUSTER says: The fact Jason dishonestly re-enters this inadequate, deficient level of regressive argument in the face of correct facts he refuses to answer means we win the debate by any credible standard…At this point Jason would be banned from further participation in any credibly-moderated debate…Crompton’s clear context is “If Jimi wasn’t murdered by being drowned in wine those high levels would have killed him” – but even that isn’t true.
JASON says: Here we go again with your repetitive troll speak. You’ve been banned from every site and forum you posted on. I am posting the facts. The problem is YOU can’t handle it doctor. Good job of putting your own lying words into the mouth of Dr. Crompton. Just like a hoaxing troll does. You better brush up on your Lethal Toxicity classes. Not sure how you ever passed those classes doctor.
Our Mad Doctor is fond of using the term “cover-up” for everything and everyone. The imaginary wine supposedly used to kill Jimi would have flushed out the pills entirely with only the wine ingested and not the pills and yet Dr.Teare reported the barbiturates caused Jimi’s death with no other substance involved. You can’t ram that amount of pills down someone’s throat with that amount of wine as nothing would be swallowed. It obvious that Jimi took the pills willingly and in a relaxed state as there were no signs of trauma or violence as stated in Dr.Teare’s report.
No you can’t and the pills wouldn’t even have a chance to work when they are “drowning him in wine”. That’s why this whole nonsense is ridiculous.
The “mad doctor” has everybody involved in a “cover up” when real evidence debunks his garbage. But his “cover up” claims are asinine and make no sense how he tells his hoax.
He has Thurston involved in a “cover up” but then has him exposing the “cover up” to a reporter. He has Crompton brought in on the “cover up” but has him spilling the beans to Kathy who publishes it in her book. Not much of a “cover up” is it? Lol…It’s just a bunch of nonsense when you see how Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates spins his hoax. He has all the answers to his phony claims and says “this is what they really meant” and lies some more. Or he makes up some b.s. and demands you answer it claiming you can’t answer it and “he won the debate” and you forfeit and should be banned. That’s his troll game he uses.
The policeman who went to the hospital to find out what happened to Jimi that morning would have absolutely spoken to the doctors in casualty about Jimi. Strange how there was no mention of that five bottles of wine from Dr. Bannister then but they magically make an appearance in 1992 decades after the event. The same police officer also questioned Monika to get the facts and there was no hint of anything suspicious about Jimi’s death except that he took 9 of Monika’s Vesparax.
If there was all this wine as claimed by our “mad doctor” it would have been known on 9/18/70. The doctors would have written full reports on the wine, the “procedure” would have been documented, and the Hospital would have announced that as the cause of death. If Fraud Bannister witnessed all that wine and he thought it was “extraordinary” he would have told the police since he learned after that it was Jimi Hendrix even if he never heard of him. Our “mad doctor” expexts us to believe that nobody would say a word until Fraud Bannister decided to step into the spotlight in 1992. That’s why all these fake wine stories are after the fact claims and they have no evidence of anything.
Our “mad doctor” is now in consultation with “medical consultants” otherwise known as The Marx Brothers. Here we get “valuable information” on the function of the liver from the world’s greatest medical expert Dr Albert Doyle Buster Yates.
BUSTER says: I spoke to medical consultants and they told me that the high levels in the liver were caused by the liver trying to cleanse the body of the offending substance…The doctor I spoke to said depending on where the sample was taken from the liver the sample could have been gotten from a place where the liver had concentrated the barbiturate in its attempt to get it out of the body…
JASON says: Another claimed conversation by you with no evidence of this either. The “medical consultant” is you making up more bullshit that is completely asinine. The high liver levels were caused from lethal barbiturate poisoning that destroyed the liver. There is no “cleansing” going on when toxic poison is killing it off. You gave yourself away with your “could have been” in your sentence. How long did it take you to think this one up? Your phony claims are getting worse. This one had me laughing for a while. Hilarious!
BUSTER says: Jason is evading the point that was made and refusing to answer how a dose that the manufacturer said needed a 10th pill to reach Lethal Dose in a person with no tolerance could have caused lethal barbiturate levels in the liver?…You can’t have lethal levels in the liver if the victim didn’t take enough barbiturate to cause those levels and you can see Jason ignoring that point because he knows he can’t answer it…
JASON says: This is another lie cuz the manufacturer did not say that. They never said you need to take 10 pills before you can have a lethal overdose. The autopsy proved Jimi had a lethal dose of 9 barbiturates that returned a 0.7mg reading which is above lethal. You look very stupid trying to argue against everything that forensic science proved through analysis.
Hi Jason, I just can’t stand the idiotic rubbish that the mad doctor is posting again. He hasn’t consulted with anyone or spoken to anyone because no reputable medical professional would be coming up with the nonsense Buster claims. No forensic scientist would dispute Dr.Teare’s analysis as he was the one performing the autopsy on Jimi and filling out the actual report. Dr.Thurston and Dr. Crompton agreed with Dr.Teare’s assessment. Buster’s “expert” is just as bogus as he is.
It is right there in the referenced source…Caesar Glebbeek posted the manufacturer’s product information for Vesparax in his ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication…It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…I already explained the reason for that…It is because barbiturate science dictates that 2000mg is needed for Lethal Dose in a person with no tolerance…9 Vesparax only has 1800mg of barbiturate – 450mg of which is slow-release Brallobarbitone and therefore doesn’t count as much…I guess the science is over Jason’s head but that would be understandable for an idiotic troll…
The reason I won this debate long ago is because Jason is too stupid to understand that he still hasn’t answered the point…That you can’t have lethal levels in the liver if the victim didn’t ingest enough barbiturate to cause those levels…If 9 Vesparax is only 1800mg of barbiturate and 2000mg is required for Lethal Dose, then it is self-explanatory that the liver could not have lethal levels…In other words this proves what those doctors told me was true…That the high liver levels were caused by the sample being taken from an area of the liver that was concentrating the barbiturate in order to get rid of it like is its job to do…I already explained to Jason that what counts the most is the blood level and the measured .7mg was not enough for Lethal Dose…There is a quote out there of either Crompton, Teare, or Thurston that says the .7mg was a dangerous level but wasn’t enough to kill…Jason ignores the fact that perfectly matches what I am saying…
Buster makes another fatal error with his hoax making a stunning admission. He continues to lie telling us Jimi didn’t have enough pills to overodse when 9 pills are lethal. He also makes the absurd claim that 0.7mg is not above the lethal level. Buster’s pathetic attempt is to deny what science already proved with his bogus made up alternative fake claims.
Buster, are you saying that 0.7mg is not above lethal?
BUSTER says: It is right there in the referenced source…Caesar Glebbeek posted the manufacturer’s product information for Vesparax in his ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication…It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
JASON says: Yes, lethal dose was 9 tablets like you just wrote above and admitted to. That doesn’t mean you have to take 10 tablets in order to overdose. You are an idiot and admitted 9 tablets is a lethal dose after you were lying saying it wasn’t. You debunked your own hoax again. Thank you very much.
How ridiculous to suggest that nine Vesparax is not a lethal dose when the normal dose is half a tablet. And where did the story of a sample taken from a particular area of the liver come from. Dr. Teare was accurate in his assessment of Jimi, and Dr. Crompton told Kathy that the barbiturates destroyed Jimi’s liver as there was no other substance present at that toxic level. So clearly the barbiturates caused Jimi’s death.
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”.
JASON says: Buster has debunked his own hoax by admitting 9 tablets is a lethal dose not needing a 10th tablet. These are his words.
Jimi took 9 tablets and Buster wrote 9 tablets is a lethal dose. Buster has just proved us both to be correct and destroyed his own phony argument.
Ivana, he is making up more b.s. to deny Jimi’s lethal overdose and to still push his debunked hoax. No doctor would ever make an asinine statement like this about a liver. This nonsense only comes from a moron hoaxer peddling false b.s. and this is something new he made up cuz he never said this before. Every time his garbage is refuted he comes up with “I spoke to so and so and they told me this…..”. Well, no evidence of this b.s. exits and no doctor would ever state something thst stupid.
Buster has debunked his own hoax admitting to us that 9 tablets is a lethal overdose.
The difference with us is that we quote from reputable sources and our information comes from evidence whereas Dr.Quack deliberately distorts the facts and replaces them with his own bogus claims. What he’s offering here is not information but misinformation.
BUSTER says: It is right there in the referenced source…Caesar Glebbeek posted the manufacturer’s product information for Vesparax in his ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication…It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
JASON says: Plain writing says 9 tablets are a lethal dose. You just confirmed it to us. How can you argue claiming 9 tablets isn’t a lethal dose when you just confirmed it is?
BUSTER says: I already explained the reason for that…It is because barbiturate science dictates that 2000mg is needed for Lethal Dose in a person with no tolerance…
JASON says: “Barbiturate science” says no such thing. This is a bogus story you made up for your hoax. There is no set milligram number since overdoses varies from person to person and any other medicine or alcohol they might have already taken.
BUSTER says: 9 Vesparax only has 1800mg of barbiturate – 450mg of which is slow-release Brallobarbitone and therefore doesn’t count as much…I guess the science is over Jason’s head but that would be understandable for an idiotic troll…
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
JASON says: You just debunked your bogus claim since you confirmed 9 Vesparax tablets are a lethal dose.
Doesn’t count as much? You are full of crap. That makes the pill even more strong.
You’re purposely leaving out the Hydroxyzine that is inside Vesparax making the pill more powerful. Vesparax has 3 main components and you only state 2 on purpose trying to make the pill less in strength for your hoax.
The Hydroxyzine and secobarbital makes the brallobarbital more stronger giving the person symptoms of a hangover the next day. All 3 components work in accordance making the pill more stronger for sleeping purposes.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates makes crap up and he has no idea what he is even talking about either that or he is purposely trying to diminish how powerful this pill really was so he can claim it wasn’t lethal. He already told us 9 Vesparax pills are a lethal dose so he debunked his own hoax. Hilarious!
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
JASON says: Jimi Hendrix took a lethal dose of 9 Vesparax tablets. Thanks for confirming that a lethal dose was 9 tablets. I’ve stated this all along. Glad you finally learned something since you now agree a lethal dose was 9 tablets.
Dr. Yates needs to his homework more carefully in future and stop making stupid errors or at least remember what idiotic things he’s said in previous posts.
It wasn’t me who said the .7mg was not lethal it was one of the London Coroner’s Office pathologists…Jason is a sick individual who thinks he has a right to ignore barbiturate science and logical argument…If you check out known barbiturate science it is FACT that a person with no tolerance requires 2000mg of barbiturate to reach Lethal Dose…As much as Jason ridicules it, Jimi was well known to have a famous tolerance and proved so in Denmark a few weeks earlier when he took a hand full of barbs and washed them down with a pint of whiskey and didn’t even pass out (or vomit)…9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate, 450mg of which is slow-release Brallobarbitone that doesn’t have as much effect in the short 1 to 2 hour period Jimi had the pills in him for…As long as Jason continues to ignore this and make regressive arguments based on stupid trolling I have won this debate and do not have to further respond…What we have here is Jason being allowed to ignore proof and continue to chase his own tail with bogus arguments and trolling instead of acknowledging good evidence…Jimi was the victim of a government conspiracy where evidence of homicide was criminally avoided by the British authorities for political purposes concerning Jimi being on FBI’s Security Index as well as a British Intelligence operative being the murderer…Therefore the falsified evidence produced at the Inquest cannot be trusted or used straight in determining what happened…Anyone with common sense can see the clear pattern of the British government avoiding investigating criminal circumstances that should have normally triggered further investigation…
Pearls before trolls…
Buster is running away again like a coward after he debunked his own phony hoax himself both yesterday and today. Buster had admitted to us that 9 Vesparax pills are a lethal dose which makes the 0.7mg reading above lethal in Jimi Hendrix. Buster was lying the whole time trying to say it wasn’t. Now he claims he never said it but we have all his quotes ready to go to show how he lies. Buster makes up more lies about “Jimi’s tolerance” cuz he is a pathological liar. That’s why Buster is always defeated with documented evidence. Then when Buster knows he is defeated, he brings out his own phony made up government conspiracy and of course he has no evidence of anything. This is Buster’s poor and feeble way to remove himself from the discussion as he has lost his phony hoax debunking it himself. Congratulations Buster!
BUSTER says: It wasn’t me who said the .7mg was not lethal it was one of the London Coroner’s Office pathologists…
JASON says: Oh, so now you agree the 0.7mg is above lethal? So, you just debunked your hoax again. Wow Buster, you destroyed your phony hoax in the last two days. You had 11 years and it was a good run.
You’re lying Buster. No coroner’s officer said 0.7mg is not lethal when 0.7mg is officially registered in science as an above lethal number. No professional would ever say that 0.7mg is not lethal. The only person making this bogus claim is you. Here are your quotes.
BUSTER says: Jason is doing here is repeating the false claim that .7mg/100ml was a fatal blood level…It wasn’t.
BUSTER says: However if we slow it down and investigate those quotes more carefully we will see that .5mg “toxic” means nothing and is just like saying drinking a six pack of beer is “toxic”.
JASON says: So, here is Buster making his own absurd claims that the 0.7mg reading was not lethal. But he has to lie blaming an unknown coroner’s officer he can never name. The fact is no coroner’s officer ever said 0.7mg is not lethal. Another lie by Buster has been exposed.
BUSTER says: Jason is a sick individual who thinks he has a right to ignore barbiturate science and logical argument…
JASON says: The only sick individual here is you who makes up your own lies wanting Jimi Hendrix to be “murdered”. You’ve done this for 11 years and everything you say is complete crap. Your fake claims you make up in your crazy head is not “barbiturate science”, it is a joke and you’ve been exposed as a fraud. Nothing you have ever written is “logical”, it is pure fantasy, which is why all your lies are debunked with documented evidence and you never can produce any.
BUSTER says: If you check out known barbiturate science it is FACT that a person with no tolerance requires 2000mg of barbiturate to reach Lethal Dose…
JASON says: There’s no such thing requiring 2000mg to reach a lethal dose and this troll can’t produce any evidence for his own bogus made up claim since no evidence exists of this nonsense.
BUSTER says: As much as Jason ridicules it, Jimi was well known to have a famous tolerance and proved so in Denmark a few weeks earlier when he took a hand full of barbs and washed them down with a pint of whiskey and didn’t even pass out (or vomit)…
JASON says: Another lie from this troll proving he has no clue about Jimi Hendrix history and he claims to be “the foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix”. Jimi almost died on 5 Mandrax and here’s what the Associated Press reported on Jimi in 1970 about Buster’s bogus “a few weeks earlier claim”.
Associated Press: “Drug overdoses severely impaired his musical ability; at a show in 1970, for example, he had to step down from the stage after only three songs due to a sedative overdose.”
JASON says: Jimi didn’t have the “famous tolerance to drugs” as this hoaxer Buster claims. Jimi couldn’t even perform after 3 songs due to only sedatives. And this idiot thinks he would survive 9 Vesparax?
BUSTER says: 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate, 450mg of which is slow-release Brallobarbitone that doesn’t have as much effect in the short 1 to 2 hour period Jimi had the pills in him for…As long as Jason continues to ignore this and make regressive arguments based on stupid trolling I have won this debate and do not have to further respond…
JASON says: You haven’t won a damn thing you clown. You purposely omit Hydroxyzine that is inside Vesparax to make the pill less in strength.
Vesprax contains Secobarbital, brallobarbital, hydroxyzine which is more powerful than Mandrax, you idiot. Taking 9 Vesparax pills is like taking 35 Mandrax cuz of the potency of the pill. Jimi took 18 times the normal Vesparax dosage which is why it was lethal. Yes, no further need for any replies from you cuz you’ve shown your complete ignorance about barbiturates and your phony hoax was exposed as a fraud.
BUSTER says: What we have here is Jason being allowed to ignore proof and continue to chase his own tail with bogus arguments and trolling instead of acknowledging good evidence…
JASON says: What we have here is a trolling hoaxer named Brian Doyle, who calls himself “Buster” on this site who makes up blatant lies and his own fake evidence. Brian Doyle aka Buster has been exposed as a fraud once again.
BUSTER says: Jimi was the victim of a government conspiracy where evidence of homicide was criminally avoided by the British authorities for political purposes concerning Jimi being on FBI’s Security Index as well as a British Intelligence operative being the murderer…Therefore the falsified evidence produced at the Inquest cannot be trusted or used straight in determining what happened…Anyone with common sense can see the clear pattern of the British government avoiding investigating criminal circumstances that should have normally triggered further investigation…
JASON says: More bullshit from this troll who invents a conspiracy cuz all the evidence refutes him. He can’t produce one single piece of evidence for anything he says. It’s only his own hoaxing words.
BUSTER says: Pearls before trolls…
JASON says: Hit the road troll. Your hoax is finished.
Hi Jason, I read somewhere that one of Jimi’s girlfriends Carmen,I think, woke Jimi up when she heard him choking in his sleep. It’s been suggested that Jimi suffered from sleep apnea as well as having problems sleeping. This may have been the reason he took so many of Monika’s sleeping pills. At any rate half a tablet is the recommended dosage for Vesparax anymore is asking for trouble. Being Jimi Hendrix didn’t offer any immunity to the effects of such a lethal amount-9 pills.
Yeah, a couple of his girlfriends mentioned that and said he had trouble breathing when sleeping. One of the side effects of Vesparax is breathing problems and Jimi took 9 pills 18 times the dosage.
I think we should ignore this serial internet troll and everything he says and just stick to repeating the reputable sources for information. There have been terrific books and articles written about the life and death of Jimi Hendrix and some really dodgy ones which should be avoided at all costs. Buster had decided to side with the more sensationalist ones, which contain very little truth, just to sell more copies but most of these have ended up in the bargain basement trash heap where they belong as most have been exposed as lies.
Hi Ivana,
Yes this troll Brian Doyle should be ignored but it’s also important to tamp down his deliberate lies and misinformation. He folds like a cheap deck of cards when met with the truth.
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
BUSTER says: It wasn’t me who said the .7mg was not lethal it was one of the London Coroner’s Office pathologists…
So, after all this denying, lying, and hoaxing “Buster” finally admits Jimi took a lethal dose of 9 tablets and the 0.7mg level was above lethal. Buster’s hoax was always a fraud and he proves me and Ivana to be correct.
Hi Jason, Jimi stood no chance against the powerful barbiturates he took. It’s dumb to suggest that anyone could withstand the effects of such a potent dosage. Monika’s doctor told her to take no more than half a tablet Jimi took nine no one expects a good outcome from that.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates suggests Jimi could handle up to 4000mg of Vesparax. LOL.
Yeah, her doctors told her to take a half pill and nobody would recommend taking 9.
Jason says while trying to weasel around a correct barbiturate science argument he obviously can’t answer…If Jason did that in a court room or seriously moderated debate he would be banned and the debate would be over…
It was probably a mistake on my behalf to argue with obvious nuts and trolls…
C’mon Buster, you’re trolling spiel is outdated since you debunked your own hoax.
BUSTER says: Jason says while trying to weasel around a correct barbiturate science argument he obviously can’t answer…
JASON says: I’ve already posted the correct forensic results from Jimi’s autopsy that shows he died from a lethal dose of 9 barbiturates that returned a 0.7mg above lethal number in which you agreed with. Why are you still trolling? Your hoax is finished.
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
BUSTER says: It wasn’t me who said the .7mg was not lethal it was one of the London Coroner’s Office pathologists…
JASON says: Here you are agreeing with Ivana and myself. First you say 9 tablets is a lethal dose which is 100% correct. Then you say the 0.7mg level was above lethal which is also 100% correct. So, you agree with us and debunk your own hoax. This is the correct barbiturate science in which you now agree with.
BUSTER says: If Jason did that in a court room or seriously moderated debate he would be banned and the debate would be over…
JASON says: In a court room you have to show documented evidence and present facts. That’s what I have done and is why I debunked your phony hoax. You on the other hand, make up your own lies and use fraudulent sources and offer no documented evidence. You would be convicted of perjury.
You are banned from every site and forum you ever posted on for trolling, hoaxing, lying, and purposely posting false information.
BUSTER says: It was probably a mistake on my behalf to argue with obvious nuts and trolls…
JASON says: Well, you’re a serial internet troll that’s been banned from many sites and forums. It was definitely a mistake for you to push your phony hoax from the get go and then trying to attempt to post your garbage here when two superior posters are able to debunk the crap you peddle.
Dr. Yates didn’t choose his opponents wisely when he decided to challenge us two. We know our stuff really well and the truth always wins hands down. Buster would be locked up with the key thrown away never to be released.
Hi Ivana,
Could you imagine “Buster” yelling at the judge with his long winded rants claiming he has the “correct science” and “good evidence” when he has no proof for his bogus claims he makes up? 3 minutes of that and the judge would have him hauled out of the court in cuffs and locked away to under go a psychiatric evaluation.
Buster’s “correct barbiturate science” is phony numbers he makes up in his head which means nothing.
Just love the term correct barbiturate science which are just empty words that don’t actually mean anything. Who exactly is the pathologist who disputed Dr.Teare’s autopsy results as no credible pathologist would go against the findings of another who was responsible for performing the autopsy. Jason and myself are not gullible fools.
Empty words from a hoaxer who uses the term “barbiturate science” for the phony mg numbers he makes up. He leaves out Hydroxyzine on purpose in order to make he pills less potent for his hoax. So he makes up phony mg numbers for Jimi Hendrix that are not even accurate purposely leaving out an important drug.
He says that is “correct barbiturate science”. LOL
Vesparax was a combination drug which contained Secobarbital, Brallobarbital, and Hydroxyzine.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates purposely omits the Hydroxyzine so he can claim 9 pills wasn’t powerful enough and Jimi couldn’t overdose on them due to “Jimi’s famous tolerance to drugs” for which he needed more pills. That is called fraud.
This is the kind of lying hoaxing troll that Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is.
By purposely omitting the Hydroxyzine, Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is not posting “the correct barbiturate science” he is making up phony numbers in his crazy head. And everybody reading along are nodding their heads in agreement.
Hi Jason, Tony Brown’s book contains the break down of the Vesparax so there’s no excuse for getting that bit of information wrong. Dr. Yates needs to put away his prescription pad, and head back to the Three Stooges School of Medicine and meet with the Dean Groucho Marx.
Haha…His prescription pad is issuing way too many milligrams for Jimi Hendrix.
Tony Brown’s book and other publications cited everything that is inside Vesparax but “Buster” is a hoaxing troll who purposely leaves out important information so he can push his hoax.
All major news and media publications right after Jimi’s autopsy detailed the lethal dose he took.
Some of this information is available but Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates chooses to add his own made up bogus information instead pathetically calling it “barbiturate science”.
It is pretty clear Jason doesn’t know what Hydroxyzine is…Jason is a fool only digging his troll uncredibility hole deeper…
Your troll game is over “Buster”. You admitted the 9 Vesparax pills were a lethal dose and the 0.7mg barbiturate level was above lethal.
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
BUSTER says: It wasn’t me who said the .7mg was not lethal it was one of the London Coroner’s Office pathologists…
You’re not supposed to edit the information that suits you and leave out what doesn’t. The circumstances of Jimi’s death are evident. There was nothing suspicious about it. Taking nine pills of a drug you know nothing about from a stranger is asking for trouble. Jimi didn’t have a famous tolerance to Vesparax because it clearly lead to his death. There was no other substance found in the autopsy to suggest that Jimi died of anything other than the Vesparax. Leaving out the Hydroxyzine is a pretty stupid attempt at making the drug look less toxic since the Vesparax contains those three components nothing changes that. Dr. Yates is very good at deception as we’ve read from his posts but eventually he’ll be the one digging his own hole.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates was purposely trying to make Vesparax less potent so he could claim “Jimi didn’t have enough drugs in him to overdose”. That is called fraud.
Taking 9 pills that has a strong combination of Secobarbital, Brallobarbital, and Hydroxyzine is lethal. The 0.7mg above lethal reading proved that. Our phony doctor always leaves out important pieces of information for his hoax cuz he is a fraud.
His second bogus claim was that “Jimi didn’t have the pills in him long enough for only 1-2 hours so he couldn’t overdose.” That’s another bogus lire cuz most overdoses occur with in the first hour and there is no set time for an overdose.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates already dug his hole and buried his hoax.
Hi Jason, I’m glad you came on board this thread otherwise I would be the only one dealing with Buster and his imaginary friend Flyswatter. Like you said Jason Dr. Yates second dumb claim is that pills weren’t in Jimi long enough which is another really stupid thing to say because Jimi was found fully clothed on top of the bed;I would imagine he passed out right away and death followed soon after. Just like that journalist said Jimi vomited because he was dying. The bogus wine didn’t cause the vomiting the barbiturates levels did.
Hi Ivana,
Always glad to help you out refuting a serial hoaxer.
All of Dr Albert Doyle Buster Yates’ garbage claims are just that, it’s made up nonsense that has nothing to do with how real life works. It’s all just a fantasy story he concocted and he ran with it for 11 years.
There is no set number of milligrams that requires an overdose and there is no specific amount of time that it takes to overdose. That’s his entire bogus claim for his fake “barbiturate forensic science”. His fake claim is that “Jimi didn’t take enough pills and the pills weren’t in him long enough”. Both are bogus made up claims that are easily refuted.
Taking 9 Vesparax would knock him out right away and the death followed shortly after since Dr. Crompton estimated Jimi died around 4 am and they returned back to Monika’s around 3 am.
The lethal overdose caused the vomiting and the toxins of the overdose was attacking his liver which is why he reading was so high.
Then Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates says he “spoke with doctors” who told him “high levels in the liver were caused by the liver trying to cleanse the body of the offending substance”. That is false cuz the liver is unable to do that for an overdose. Then the crap about “the sample could have been gotten from a place where the liver had concentrated the barbiturate in its attempt to get it out of the body” was the icing on the cake. All made up garbage by the serial hoaxer himself. No doctor in the world would say this. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates can’t run from from what he admitted to, that 9 pills were lethal and 0/7mg was above lethal.
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
BUSTER says: It wasn’t me who said the .7mg was not lethal it was one of the London Coroner’s Office pathologists…
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates makes another one of his famous bogus lies about barbiturates and the manufacturer. No manufacturer ever stated you “needed to take a 10th pill to reach lethal overdose” as Buster contradicted himself and lied about.
BUSTER says: Jason is evading the point that was made and refusing to answer how a dose that the manufacturer said needed a 10th pill to reach Lethal Dose in a person with no tolerance could have caused lethal barbiturate levels in the liver?…You can’t have lethal levels in the liver if the victim didn’t take enough barbiturate to cause those levels and you can see Jason ignoring that point because he knows he can’t answer it…
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
JASON says: Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is caught in another lie and famous contradiction. You’d think he would learn by now that we have all of his lies and contradictions ready to go.
First, the phony doctor lies telling us the manufacturer said a 10th pill is needed to reach lethal dose.
Then, after he was called out on his lies, he corrected himself and stated correctly that 9 tablets was a lethal overdose.
So, Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates has been lying to you all along when he was saying a 10th pill was needed to reach a lethal dose as he made up his fake mg numbers for his phony “barbiturate science”.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates now agrees that 9 tablets are a lethal overdose and Jimi had a lethal overdose on 9 Vesparax pills.
Jimi had the lethal 0.7mg toxic barbituate level cuz 9 Vesparax pills is a lethal dose. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates was lying all along with his phony 10th pill “barbiturate science” as he debunks his own hoax for everyone to see.
Hi Jason, This sounds suspiciously like the 10th pill that Monika found on the floor. I think this is where our phony Dr. Yates got the idea that you need 10 pills to reach a lethal dose. Now he’s fixated with the hydroxyzine component of the Vesparax; the information is readily available on the internet.
Hi Ivana,
It certainly does, and I was thinking the same thing. Glad you pointed that out for everybody.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates read where Monika was talking about the 10th pill on the floor by the bed and then Buster comes up with Jimi needing a 10th pill to overdose. After that, he makes up his own fake mg numbers claiming “it wasn’t enough for Jimi to overdose” while he says it’s “forensic barbiturate science”. That’s his entire hoax for his denial of Jimi’s lethal overdose as he trolls and hoaxes the real event. He is obsessed with Hydroxyzine now cuz I exposed him for omitting it from his phony “barbiturate science” so he could claim the Vesparax wasn’t potent enough. He is a fraud.
That’s why Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is just a troll using his old phony material. Information on Hydroxyzine can easily be found on any medical website. Then he plays his troll game saying “I can’t answer it” or whatever nonsense he tries to come up with. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is a troll and a fraud who is regularly banned from websites and forums.
Jason doesn’t know what Hydroxyzine is…That is because Jason is a troll who is making up obnoxious nay-saying replies off the top of his head and has no credible knowledge or intention in this thread or subject…
Buster, your troll game needs new material. It’s very weak and you ran this into the ground. Using projection isn’t going to help your debunked hoax. Funny how you thought omitting Hydroxyzine was going to make the Vesparax appear less potent so you could claim Jimi needed more milligrams. That’s cuz you’re a hoaxer and a fraud.
You already debunked your hoax by admitting 9 Vesparax pills is a lethal dose and 0.7mg is an above lethal number.
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
BUSTER says: It wasn’t me who said the .7mg was not lethal it was one of the London Coroner’s Office pathologists…
It is fun seeing a troll on my leash running around thinking we don’t see him having no idea what Hydroxyzine means while pretending he is lecturing me on it…The definition of a crazy troll who is over his head and not fooling anyone…Explain to me what Hydroxyzine is Jason and why it is so dangerous…Boy are you stupid…
You have Fraud Bannister on a leash? What? Don’t tell me. I don’t want to know.
Seems these two are hunting the scent of the missing 5 bottles of imaginary wine. I think Buster would make a good bloodhound since his ex fraud doctor Bannister has been leading him by the nose with his fake claims of wine for all these years.
Explain Hydroxyzine to you? Look it up yourself Chief. You’re the one who purposely left it out of your phony “barbiturate science”. Did you have a trolling denial reply ready to go for the Hydroxyzine that you omitted?
Good luck with finding the five bottles of wine. Dr. Yates will waste another 11 years of his life searching for them.
A bogus wasted 11 year hoax. Not sure if he is going to continue though for another 11.
So, he started off with 3 bottles posting as “Albert Doyle”. Then he increased it to 4 bottles posting as “Jetblast”. Now posting as “Buster” we get 5 bottles. He should increase it to 6 and make it a half dozen.
When Buster claimed he had just “spoken to Fraud Bannister”, he was asked point blank by a poster on another site if the phony wine was ever measured. “Buster” gave a vague answer and ignored it claiming it “was put in a container” and the nurses lost it. So there is no way for him to now claim “5 bottles” or any number of bottles when he was unable to give an answer then. There was no wine anyway, but this proves “Buster” just added the fake number of bottles claim later for his hoax like he does with everything else. Bottles of wine can’t keep increasing from 3, 4, 5 if you have a real story. Buster increases his imaginary bottles of wine like he does his barbiturate milligrams.
Buster should be a bartender pouring glasses of wine. Then he can deal with real wine and tell imaginary stories of fake a wine “Hendrix murder” to the drunken customers sitting on the bar stool.
Is Dr. Yates embarking on a new career as a pharmacist?
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates can add a pharmacist to his phony résumé. He’s trying really hard for me to explain Hydroxyzine so he can make a phony denial claim that it wouldn’t harm Jimi. That’s how desperate he is. He trolled the same way for the lethal 9 Vesparax pills and the above lethal 0.7mg toxic barbituate level. I got him to debunk his phony hoax getting him to admit that 9 Vesparax pills are a lethal dose and 0.7mg is an above lethal barbiturate level.
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
BUSTER says: It wasn’t me who said the .7mg was not lethal it was one of the London Coroner’s Office pathologists…
JASON says: Buster debunked his own hoax confirming that a lethal dose is 9 Vesparax tablets.
Buster debunked his own hoax again after he confirmed 0.7mg is above lethal. But he fraudulently lies about the pathologist cuz no doctor ever said 0.7mg is not lethal.
So in 2020, Buster debunks his own 11 year phony “murder” hoax admitting Jimi Hendrix died from a 9 Vesparax pill lethal overdose that returned a 0.7mg above lethal barbituate level.
Our serial internet hoaxer will soon find something else to latch onto. It’s all part of his game.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates’ phony hoax game always needs something new to invent. The wheels are turning in his head right now as he is looking for a way to deny the Hydroxyzine that he purposely omitted from his phony “barbiturate science”. I have faith that he will come through once again and won’t disappoint.
It is well-known barbiturate science that 2000mg is the Lethal Dose threshold for persons with no tolerance…The two ignorant assholes Jason and Ivana mock it, but they are only mocking themselves…Proof that this is true is the fact the Vesparax manufacturer lists a 10th tablet as being necessary for Lethal Dose because they know 9 tablets only contains 1800mg of barbiturate…If 9 tablets was a Lethal Dose they would have simply listed 9 tablets…The reason they listed a 10th tablet is because they knew 1800mg wasn’t enough…There’s the proof right there that Jason still hasn’t been able to answer…But any simple look at commonly-known barbiturate science will quickly show that 2000mg is the Lethal Dose threshold…Again, if Jason did this in a court or credibly moderated debate he would quickly be restricted from further idiotic trolling in response to conclusive science…
Hydroxyzine is anti-histamine…Jason tried to say I deliberately omitted a dangerous drug from my forensic case…The reason the autopsy doctors never mention Hydroxyzine in their cause of death reasoning is because it didn’t have anything to do with Jimi’s death…Jason is just an idiot throwing trolling darts blindly hoping one will hit the mark…
Strange how the manufacturers of Vesparax would be encouraging an overdose if the recommended dosage is only half a tablet. Jimi had a lethal amount of the drug in his system having taken 9 of the pills. It’s irresponsible to suggest that taking anything other than the recommended amount by the doctor is not an overdose. Do you really think a 10th pill would have made a difference in the outcome. Clearly not because Jimi died way back in 1970. Any medication, whether prescription or otherwise, comes marked with take strictly as directed. I’m certain Monika’s Vesparax would have had such a label otherwise she would not have known how many to take. Unfortunately Jimi went way over what was safe to take and paid the ultimate price.
BUSTER says: It is well-known barbiturate science that 2000mg is the Lethal Dose threshold for persons with no tolerance…The two ignorant assholes Jason and Ivana mock it, but they are only mocking themselves…Proof that this is true is the fact the Vesparax manufacturer lists a 10th tablet as being necessary for Lethal Dose because they know 9 tablets only contains 1800mg of barbiturate…If 9 tablets was a Lethal Dose they would have simply listed 9 tablets…The reason they listed a 10th tablet is because they knew 1800mg wasn’t enough…There’s the proof right there that Jason still hasn’t been able to answer…But any simple look at commonly-known barbiturate science will quickly show that 2000mg is the Lethal Dose threshold…Again, if Jason did this in a court or credibly moderated debate he would quickly be restricted from further idiotic trolling in response to conclusive science…
JASON says: There’s no such thing as a “2000mg is the Lethal Dose threshold for persons with no tolerance” since overdoses vary from person to person and if other medications or alcohol is involved. There is no set number of mg’s for people.
Buster is lying since the manufactures never said a person “needs 10 pills to overdose” and he can’r post this information since he is lying about it.
BUSTER says: Hydroxyzine is anti-histamine…Jason tried to say I deliberately omitted a dangerous drug from my forensic case…The reason the autopsy doctors never mention Hydroxyzine in their cause of death reasoning is because it didn’t have anything to do with Jimi’s death…Jason is just an idiot throwing trolling darts blindly hoping one will hit the mark…
JASON says Yes, you did purposely omit hydroxyzine from your phony numbers cuz you were trying to make the pill appear to be less potent.
Vesparax is a powerful 3 combination drug that is not like other barbiturates. The Hydroxyzine works in accordance with the Secobarbital strengthening the brallobarbital which make this pill super potent.
Being that Hydroxyzine is an antihistamine, it is fatal when taken with an amphetamine. Jimi took an overdose of Hydroxyzine which proved fatal with the black bomber cuz the Hydroxyzine is a major component in this 3 drug pill.
I said this morning that Buster would make a phony denial claim that Hydroxyzine wouldn’t harm Jimi, and just like clockwork, he makes that claim later today.
I’ve been reading about the side effects of hydroxyzine: deep sleep, sedation and calmness. Jimi took nine so he didn’t stand a chance. He would have been unconscious in a short amount of time. This I think explains why he was found fully dressed and covered in vomit because he would have been unable to rouse himself out it. Buster should stop making a fool of himself and just accept that he has been wrong for 11 years.
IVANA says: I’ve been reading about the side effects of hydroxyzine: deep sleep, sedation and calmness. Jimi took nine so he didn’t stand a chance. He would have been unconscious in a short amount of time. This I think explains why he was found fully dressed and covered in vomit because he would have been unable to rouse himself out it. Buster should stop making a fool of himself and just accept that he has been wrong for 11 years.
JASON says: Don’t forget that the Hydroxyzine works in accordance with the Secobarbital that strengthens the brallobarbital making it last longer. So, you have 3 strong drugs inside 1 pill and Jimi took 9 of these. Then you have Buster making absurd claim Jimi could take 10 of these with no problem. We can’t forget his laugh out loud phony claim Jimi could take 2000mg up to 4000mg of Vesparax. Jimi never took Vesparax before and this 1 pill was stronger than anything he ever took. 9 Vesparax is the equivalent of 35 Mandrax. And Buster thinks Jimi could have swallowed 35 Mandrax pills in one setting and not overdose on those? That’s why Buster’s bogus claims are a joke and he still thinks he is posting “barbiturate science”. Buster is definitely making a fool of himself as he pathetically tries to deny the real event of Jimi’s overdose and medical science relating to the human body and drugs.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates informs us what Hydroxyzine is and still continues to push his bogus 2000mg overdose threshold nonsense. And now he says that 9 Vesparax tablets are not lethal when he admitted they were a few days ago. It’s hopeless for him cuz all he can do is deny Jimi’s overdose by making up fake claims and contradicting his previous ones by debunking his entire bogus claim. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates already debunked his hoax when he admitted that 9 Vesparax pills are a lethal dose. Denying Jimi’s overdose and making up phony miligram numbers is not “science”, it’s stupidity.
BUSTER says: Jason is just an idiot throwing trolling darts blindly hoping one will hit the mark…
JASON says: My darts already hit the bullseye joker. You’ve already debunked your hoax admitting 9 pills is a lethal dose.
BUSTER says: Hydroxyzine is anti-histamine…Jason tried to say I deliberately omitted a dangerous drug from my forensic case…
JASON says: Buster finally confirms what Hydroxyzine is for us. You don’t have a “forenisc case” since you only make up fake mg numbers for what you want to claim Jimi Hendrix could tolerate. Phony estimations you make up has nothing to do with science or medicine. You don’t even understand the term “forensic”.
Yes, you did omit Hydroxyzine from your phony mg number claims. Omitting the mg of Hydroxyzine inside each pill makes your phony mg numbers inaccurate and each pill less potent. Hydroxyzine is a major component of Vesparax and you failed to cite it.
Hydroxyzine is fatal when mixed with an amphetamine like Jimi did. Jimi overdosed on 9 Vesparax pills which is an overdose of Hydroxyzine.
BUSTER says: The reason the autopsy doctors never mention Hydroxyzine in their cause of death reasoning is because it didn’t have anything to do with Jimi’s death…
JASON says: Just as I said Buster would do yesterday, he was going to deny that Hydroxyzine would harm Jimi. Hydroxyzine has a lot to do with Jimi’s death. Jimi took an overdose of Hydroxyzine in 9 Vesparax pills along with a powerful amphetamine. Mixing antihistamines and amphetamines are fatal. So, this joker Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates, who pretends to be a medical expert, has no clue of the deadly drug interactions especially with a powerful 3 combination pill like Vesparax which Jimi overdosed on 9.
BUSTER says: It is well-known barbiturate science that 2000mg is the Lethal Dose threshold for persons with no tolerance.
JASON says: There’s no such thing as a “2000mg overdose threshold for persons with no tolerance”. Overdoses varies from person to person and any other medicine or alcohol they might have already taken with it. There is no set mg numbers for people. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates trying to claim the public could take 2000mg of Vesparax and not overdose on it is the biggest asinine statement ever and it’s why Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is seen as a total clown.
BUSTER says: Proof that this is true is the fact the Vesparax manufacturer lists a 10th tablet as being necessary for Lethal Dose because they know 9 tablets only contains 1800mg of barbiturate.
JASON says: This is a complete lie. The Vesparax manufacturers never said you needed a 10th pill for a lethal dose. Post this listing you are lying about cuz they never said this. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates shows his ignorance again since Vesparax is a combination drug with 3 powerful drugs inside 1 pill. Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates already debunked his hoax when he said 9 pills were a lethal dose.
BUSTER says: If 9 tablets was a Lethal Dose they would have simply listed 9 tablets.
JASON says: You already stated they listed 9 tablets. Are you forgetting your lies doctor? You already debunked your hoax when you admitted this.
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
JASON says: See, you already stated a lethal dose was 9 tablets and you debunked your own hoax.
BUSTER says: If 9 tablets was a Lethal Dose they would have simply listed 9 tablets.
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
JASON says: How is this for another fine contradiction from this hoaxing clown? He still doesn’t understand we have all his lies and contradictions ready to go. So, Buster says that they listed 9 tablets which a lethal dose and now he lies about it again. This is why Buster is a lying hoaxer who gets banned from every site and forum he posts on.
BUSTER says: If 9 tablets was a Lethal Dose they would have simply listed 9 tablets…The reason they listed a 10th tablet is because they knew 1800mg wasn’t enough…There’s the proof right there that Jason still hasn’t been able to answer…
JASON says: Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is lying again cuz the Vesparax manufacturers never said you needed “10 pills” to have a fatal overdose. This joker won’t be able to post this false information either. Drug manufacturers are not going to list “10 pills” are needed to overdose, cuz when a person who takes 8 or 9 overdoses, they will get sued.
BUSTER says: But any simple look at commonly-known barbiturate science will quickly show that 2000mg is the Lethal Dose threshold…
JASON says: Repeating your phony claim isn’t going to make it be true. There’s no such thing as a “2000mg overdose threshold” and you keep making more of an ass out of yourself each time you post this nonsense.
BUSTER says: Again, if Jason did this in a court or credibly moderated debate he would quickly be restricted from further idiotic trolling in response to conclusive science…
JASON says: Haha my favorite line that Buster always repeats. Buster is banned from every site and forum he posts on for hoaxing just like he does here. Just like he lied about and changed the 9 tablet overdose he admitted to. Everything I post are the accurate facts unlike the lies and crap you peddle.
Your bogus mg numbers is not “conclusive science” that’s called nonsense.
You already debunked your hoax when you admitted that 9 Vesparax pills are a lethal overdose.
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
Hi Jason, Buster is posting his rubbish again. It’s Buster who would be laughed off the witness stand and then given a full psychiatric assessment. This guy wouldn’t recognise the truth even if it came up to him and introduced itself. Buster writes about what he thinks happened to Jimi but he really has no idea.
Hi Ivana,
Yeah, that’s all Buster can do is post rubbish claims since he has no real evidence to produce. His phony “2000mg overdose threshold” nonsense turns out to be a fantasy scenario where fictitious experts rule in Buster’s favor inside an imaginary court room that his “barbiturate science” is credible. This clown isn’t even trying anymore and his claims are just stupid not even worthy to be seriously discussed.
Jason is trolling so he is deliberately keeping the information limited to his offhand blather-trolling in order not to provide too much detail that would only back my case…Because of this Jason is deliberately avoiding the FACT that indeed the 2000mg Lethal Dose threshold I am citing is valid and is pretty dependable as far as determining Lethal Dose for barbiturates…As I keep repeating, if Jason had challenged my barbiturate science in a court of law we would go to the textbooks and medical science, along with expert consultants, and find out if 2000mg is the dependable amount I am saying…The experts would confirm me and they would also agree Jason is a demented trolling ass who is just nay-saying and denying everything I write for trolling purposes and hoping I am dumb enough to respond…The question to Jason is: “If the Lethal Dose varies so much what made the Vesparax manufacturer specifically list ‘9 to 10 tablets’ as a Lethal Dose?” – Ask Jason to answer this directly without blather-trolling crazy denial…The reason the manufacturer listed 9 to 10 tablets is because 9 is only 1800mg and 10 passes the critical 2000mg amount for barbiturate…Jason is lying because he can’t answer the science he calls for…So being a demented troll who has nothing to lose because he never has any intention of ever honestly or seriously participating in this discussion, he enters the idiotic lie that 2000mg isn’t the critical Lethal Dose threshold for the main Secobarbital ingredient of Vesparax…This is easily checkable because every barbiturate reference I have checked have all repeated the 2000mg number for Lethal Dose…Jason furthers his idiocy by saying the amount varies so much that it can’t be used…But that isn’t true because he is using that false argument to ignore the fact that Jimi had a well-known tolerance that made a 9 pill dose fall even further below the lethal range than the 1800mg already failed to meet…Everything Jason enters is an effort to obfuscate the debate in thick layers of trolling bullshit in order not to answer the main point…The 1800mg of Secobarbital in 9 Vesparax was not enough barbiturate to kill Jimi by overdose no matter how many times Jason tries to blather-troll and lie his way around it…
Because Jason only found out about this topic when he decided to troll this comments section he is ignoring that the reference for the Vesparax manufacturer’s product information was Caesar Glebbeek’s ‘Until We Meet Again’ (2011) publication…Jason is seeking to lie and deny so he ignores the reference, makes no effort to locate and study it, and then comes back and trollishly accuses me of making up references…Again, this demented dishonesty meant solely for trolling purposes and denying correct information would get this sick asshole Jason rightfully booted from any credibly moderated debate or court room…Remember – Jason is trolling and doesn’t provide any source for his crazy denial while ignoring my proven sources…
Jason is a troll and pretends we don’t see him not answering the fact that the London Coroner’s Office doctors who were trying to say the Vesparax killed Jimi as part of a cover-up also omitted the Hydroxyzine from their cause of death reasoning…The reason for that is because they knew that they medically couldn’t get away with it…They knew the Hydroxyzine was not contributory on a forensic basis to the cause of death…If it were they would have said so because they were trying to contrive a drug cause for Jimi’s death…Jason ignores and avoids this in his trolling response because he knows it is true and he can’t answer it…Jason accuses me of lying but the reference is right there in the source I cited and is just as I said…So after falsely accusing me of lying and not credibly answering to a correctly-cited source Jason is allowed to ignore it, not admit he is wrong, and then not admit the correct argument I making…Justin provides quite an accommodating venue for sick trolls…
There is zero credible science Jason could offer to show that the Hydroxyzine was added to Vesparax “to strengthen the Brallobarbital”…Keep in mind the denial troll Jason knew nothing about this subject until he decided to troll this thread…So his posture of teaching me about Vesparax is all part of his sick trolling game…Truth is I taught him all he knows about Vesparax…All references to Vesparax that I’ve read say the antihistamine was added because the barbiturate was sedating so strongly that people were not expectorating flem while under the drug’s suppressive influence…All sources I’ve read say the antihistamine was added in order to keep people from building up too much flem during sedation…Jason cannot produce any reference to the antihistamine being added to enhance the Brallobarbital because he is a nut who made that up in order to make his trolling claim more damaging to the truth…If Jason had any understanding of the drug science he is mangling the Brallobarbitone needed no enhancing because it was designed to lay back and come on later as a slow-release barbiturate…
Jason is a trolling nut who is pulling his trolling claims out of his ass he he goes along…He is asking us to believe that his very obviously made-up claim that Hydroxyzine was fatal in combination with amphetamine was somehow missed by the autopsists at Jimi’s autopsy and Inquest and not mentioned – even though they were contriving the medical science and seeking to blame the drugs for Jimi’s death…Jason is using this demented trolling tactic to avoid the fact a minor amount of stimulant (amphetamine) would be part of the treatment for a dangerous Vesparax dose and would have only added to the forensic balance in Jimi’s favor that made overdose impossible…Jason still hasn’t answered this in his attempt to avoid it with obscuring blather-trolling and denial…
This entire body of bullshit Jason offers is designed to seize the narrative and keep the conversation focused on his obfuscating bullshit…Its purpose is to keep you from realizing the drug forensics I outlined help show that Dr Bannister’s real witnessing of Jimi being drowned in a substantial amount of wine was the true cause of his death…This wine drowning was corroborated Dr’s Siefert and Thurston…May any asshole who makes an overt effort to deny this be burned in hell…
Delusional. You haven’t taught anyone anything. You’re demented and it shows in your reasoning and avoidance in accepting what really happened to Jimi. There was no murder this is an assumption on your part; you don’t post evidence just fabricated nonsense disguised as fact. You’re good at choosing words and phrases designed to bamboozal the reader to make it seem as though you’re a real expert and know what you’re talking about but in reality you’re anything but the image you’re trying to project of yourself. Other forums have banned you from posting for a very good reason and it has everything to do with what you’re presenting.
Buster continues to make his case for why he needs severe mental help. Buster is nothing but a hoaxer, a clown, and a laughing stock providing pure comedy for all. This absurd comment he posted leaves no doubt in anybody’s mind.
Buster starts this farce off by repeating his phony “2000mg overdose threshold” nonsense that he made up himself, which he believes is medical science, cuz he is a lunatic who belongs in a straight jacket. There’s nothing documented in any medical books that says anything about a “2000mg overdose threshold” for people. I told Buster to cite this information to prove it exists, but of course he can’t, cuz he made it up himself. It doesn’t exist.
This phony “2000mg threshold” Buster claims doesn’t exist just like his fake imaginary wine he claims. So, Buster becomes irate calling me a “troll” and then rants like a loon and admits this isn’t even science just like I said. Buster then gives us this fantasy court scenario where “expert consultants” would “agree” with him in court that “Buster’s science” is a great discovery and these “experts” would conclude I am wrong. Can you believe the insanity? This is Buster’s claim of his phony “2000mg overdose threshold” evidence. A fictional farce he invented in his crazy head. So, no documented evidence exists of this bogus phony “2000mg overdose threshold” that Buster claims, but only a fantasy scenario in Buster’s deranged mind where “experts” would agree with him in a fantasy court that Buster is a “forensic expert”. This man needs mental help. I said there is no such thing as a phony “2000mg overdose threshold” and i was 100% correct. We can all see why Buster is a clown who has no credibility making up absurd fantasy nonsense for his phony “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax”.
Buster then goes on to whine, sniveling that Jimi didn’t “have enough pills to overdose”, but then contradicts himself debunking his hoax when he says the manufacturers stated 9 pills are a lethal overdose. Jimi Hendrix took 9 Vesparax pills and had a lethal overdose. Doesn’t this clown see how he debunked his own hoax by admitting 9 pills are a lethal overdose? Is he really this stupid? Then Buster still whines, saying 9 pills isn’t enough, and cries “I’m trolling” when I am speaking the truth and pointing out his blatant contradictions, hoaxing nonsense, and obvious denial.
BUSTER says: 9 Vesparax was not enough barbiturate to kill Jimi by overdose
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
It can’t be anymore clear than this folks. First, Buster whines that 9 Vesparax was not enough to kill Jimi and then Buster says “in plain writing” that 9 Vesparax tablets are a lethal dose. Buster is clearly trolling and hoaxing wanting to have it both ways and he can’t. That’s why he has debunked his own phony hoax. 9 pills are a lethal dose cuz Buster said the manufacturers said 9 pills are a lethal dose. Jimi took 9 pills and the autopsy proved Jimi had a lethal 9 pill overdose. So, the manufacturers were right on the mark when they said 9 pills is a lethal dose like Buster told us above.
Buster, why are you lying saying 9 pills was not enough pills when you said “in plain writing” that 9 pills were a lethal dose? You can’t have it both ways Chief. By admitting in plain writing that 9 Vesparax pills a lethal dose, you are debunking your phony “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax”, but you’re too stupid to realize it. You said 9 pills are a lethal dose so you debunked your hoax. Everybody reading can see you debunked your own hoax and they are nodding their heads in agreement. What do you have to say for yourself?
Buster is highly ignorant of drugs and which ones are deadly when you mix the wrong ones together especially with an overdose. Mixing a powerful amphetamine with an overdose of 9 powerful barbiturates is deadly along with alcohol like Jimi did. The dose of Vesparax was 1/2 to 1 tablet. Jimi took 9 which is an lethal overdose since no printed information for Vesparax gave 9 pills as a recommended dosage. On the Vesparax pamphlet it read :”Never take Vesparax in larger amounts, or for longer than recommended by your doctor”. Jimi took Vesparax in a large amount of 9 pills which he wasn’t supposed to do as the information indicated. Also, it clearly stated that liver damage will occur due to an overdose and this drug is absorbed extensively by the liver. The autopsy showed high toxic levels in Jimi’s liver so the warnings indicated proved to be accurate.
Vesparax was a 3 combination pill which the Hydroxyzine and Secobarbital strengthened the Brallobarbital making it last longer in the system. This was the purpose of the pill since it is a 3 combination pill to control bi polar disorders and to act as a sleeping pill. This information can be easily found unlike Buster’s fake “2000mg lethal overdose threshold” that will be determined by fictional experts in a fantasy court room scenario. Buster has no proof for any of his fake claims just like his phony imaginary wine.
A Hydroxyzine overdose is fatal along with a powerful amphetamine and 2 other drugs in the Vesparax which was Secobarbital and Brallobarbital. Jimi was also over the legal alcohol limit which Dr. Teare said was enough to fail a breathalyzer test. Alcohol intensifies drugs and Jimi took a lethal overdose.
Buster makes up the fraudulent lie about Dr. Thurston cuz he never said anything about any phony wine. Buster is citing a fake second hand quote from Sharon Lawrence’s fiction book that was already debunked. Sharon Lawrence said Jimi Hendrix committed suicide with 9 pills. She claimed to be a close friend of Jimi’s so she would know Jimi’s drug tolerance. Even Sharon knew 9 Vesparax pills were a lethal dose cuz she said it was in her book. So, Sharon Lawrence debunks Buster as well. Hilarious! Dr. Siefert contradicted himself with his claims. No wine was witnessed at the flat, no documents exist of this phony wine, and no forensic analysis of Jimi’s body detected any massive wine in the lungs or the stomach. Where is all this phony wine? So, no phony wine existed and Buster can only deny Jimi’s lethal drug overdose with his made up fake “2000mg overdose threshold” claim that a fantasy court decides he is correct. I’m still laughing my head off at this. And everybody reading is too.
Buster wants to whine that 9 Vesparax pills weren’t enough to kill Jimi Hendrix but he already admitted that 9 Vesparax pills were a lethal dose. Vesparax pills were powerful pills and more mg’s than Jimi ever took before in his life. 9 Vesparax pills are the equivalent of 32-35 Mandrax pills. So, under Buster’s phony science, he believes that Jimi could have swallowed up to 40 Mandrax pills and still not die. 40 Mandrax pills equals about 10 Vesparax pills. Can you believe this nonsense? Buster also claimed that Jimi needed 3000mg up to 4000mg of Vesparax to overdose. So, Buster then claims Jimi could swallow 72 or more Mandrax pills all at once and still not die with his 3000mg and 4000mg absurd Vesparax claims. That’s why Buster is a hoaxer and a clown and has no idea of mg in drugs.
Under Buster’s phony “2000mg overdose threshold nonsense” he believes that every person could swallow 10 Vesparax pills and not overdose which equals 40 Mandrax pills. According to Buster the “forensic specialist”, everybody can gobble down all these 40 pills and still not die reaching the safe “overdose threshold”. This is the “correct forensic science” Buster touts as his great discovery and says “nobody has ever scratched the surface” or has defeated him on in 11 years. Can’t wait for the fictional “experts” in the fantasy court room to declare Dr Albert Doyle Buster Yates as the “Greatest Forensic Medical Mind” in the history of the world.
Hilariously, Buster makes all these bogus drug claims and pathetic denials in order to keep his fake and phony debunked wine murder hoax going. This whole thing has been one giant joke from the start and Buster makes more of a farce out of it each time he posts. Phony science in a fantasy court room with fictional experts is Buster’s “evidence” of his “2000mg overdose threshold”. Gotta love that!
Dr. Thurston accepted, without doubt, Dr. Teare’s findings that the barbiturates caused Jimi’s death. During the inquest Dr. Thurston never mentioned wine or Dr. Bannister. If Dr. Thurston suspected anything other, then Dr’s Seifert and Bannister would have been called to the inquest. But no such thing occurred because Dr.Thurston was satisfied with all of the witnessing and investigating of that morning’s events.
We all learned yesterday that Buster’s bogus “2000mg overdose threshold” claim is a farce just like I said it was. I asked Buster to post documented evidence of this claim, and he couldn’t post any, cuz this is not science and it doesn’t exist since Buster made it up himself. Buster could only absurdly come up with his phony invented story of a fantasy court room with fictional experts agreeing with him that his “forensic science” is the greatest in the world. This is called trolling and it’s why this joker gets banned from every site and forum for the made up lies he posts.
Buster can only pathetically deny Jimi’s lethal drug overdose and invent his phony claims of imaginary wine that doesn’t exist since he has no documents of it either. So, we get even more fake stories of imaginary wine just like his fake made up “2000mg overdose threshold” that would be decided in his favor in a fantasy court room with fictional experts agreeing with him.
Buster can only pathetically deny Jimi’s lethal drug overdose claiming 9 Vesparax pills isn’t enough to overdose, but then Buster debunks this claim by stating 9 Vesparax pills are a lethal dose. This just proves once again why Buster is just a hoaxing troll trying to push his dead debunked hoax after he debunked it himself. This is why Buster is banned from every site and forum he posts on the internet for being a troll.
BUSTER: 9 Vesparax was not enough barbiturate to kill Jimi by overdose
BUSTER: It said in plain writing that a lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
Buster says that 9 Vesparax pills are not enough to kill Jimi but then he debunks that phony claim by stating 9 Vesparax pills are a lethal dose.
Buster debunks his own hoax by admitting that 9 Vesparax pills are a lethal dose so he can’t claim that 9 pills are not enough.
Buster is a clown and can’t run from his admission that 9 Vesparax pills are a lethal dose.
Buster confirmed 9 pills was lethal and he debunked his own hoax. No amount of denials can change what Buster admitted to.
Jason starts off by once again shooting himself in the foot…Because Jason is clueless and is learning about this subject for the first time from me when he decided to troll this comments section he is ignorant of the fact that 2000mg is a very firm and commonly-known Lethal Dose threshold for barbiturates…Again, whenever Jason gives one of his conspicuously-evasive trolling answers he tries to use verbal tricks to shift attention away from the fact he’s not answering the evidence…I asked Jason to please give a direct and honest answer to why the Vesparax manufacturer specifically listed “9 to 10 tablets” as the Lethal Dose?…Jason refused because he knew it backed what I was saying…His inability to give that simple answer loses him this debate and I don’t have to respond…Jason does not get to choose what evidence he ignores and can’t answer or direct the discussion with dishonesty…The credibly-moderated debate or jury that would judge this contest would see Jason doing that and he would be done…The answer is the Vesparax manufacturer chose 9 to 10 pills because 9 is 1800mg of barbiturate and 10 is needed to surpass the 2000mg Lethal Dose threshold for barbiturates the manufacturer was very aware of and using for its determination…Jason is trollishly and stupidly avoiding answering the point that the 2000mg is proven in the manufacturer’s citation of “9 to 10 tablets”…Since Jason is a nut who doesn’t bother to read the references I have been citing he is therefore trying to deal from the safety of his ignorance and stupidity by doing childish denial…But credible debate doesn’t work that way and the fact Jason refuses to answer this good science means he loses and no amount of nay-say trolling will make up for it…This is simple common sense and Jason is clearly unable to honestly admit it…In Jason’s sick mind the fact 10 tablets equals 2000mg, and that is what the manufacturer lists for Lethal Dose, means that I should be accused of making it up, even though the facts line up right there in front of you…When the facts clearly back me Jason can always claim I have failed to provide the documents in my overwhelming schooling of him…That’s really weak and only a nut would think he was getting away with that…Jason is doing his best to ignore the barbiturate science that says 9 tablets cannot kill a person with a known tolerance…He is also doing his best to steer the conversation around the fact known victims of Vesparax overdoses did not display any vomiting like Jimi…Flyswatter cited two famous cases of barbiturate overdoses that were in the range of blood barbiturate levels that were well beyond Lethal Dose…Neither of those two cases had any vomiting…The Underwriter’s Laboratory case histories I cited that Jason is ignorant of also had 4 cases where the victims took 10 to 15 pills (there were no overdose cases where the victim took 9 pills)…
Jason’s crashing failure to answer simple facts proves that the wine Dr’s Thurston and Siefert spoke of was wine that corroborated the massive amount of wine Dr Bannister witnessed and removed from Jimi…Since I’ve proven the barbiturate could not have killed Jimi – and Monika’s doctors, and one of the autopsy doctors, agreed the pills could not have killed Jimi, this proves Jimi was murdered by drowning in wine since I’ve proven the barbiturate was not the cause…Saying “phony claims of wine” over and over in reaction to a serious argument of evidence you obviously can’t answer is no way to address the world’s best offering of evidence in the case of Jimi’s death…
Fuck you Jason…
May you burn in hell…
Buster is “Flyswatter” which is his other fake pseudonym that he trolls with. A “wine drowning” does not induced vomiting since the person would be drowned to death. Drug overdoses induces vomiting, so this troll is easily debunked once again as the vomiting proves Jimi’s drug overdose death. Ambulance man John Saua scooped up a sample of Jimi’s vomit and only drugs from the Vesparax was analyzed inside it. So, once again, no phony wine was ever detected and this hoaxer still wants to claim phony imaginary wine.
Buster re-enters his same debunked hoaxing claims and lies once again as he incoherently repeats this same debunked nonsense. His bogus “2000mg overdose threshold” is a fantasy scenario in his crazy head where fictional experts agree inside an imaginary court room that “Buster’s science” is credible. Buster is a hoaxer and proves it with this crap. No fake “2000mg lethal overdose threshold” exists just like his fake imaginary wine.
Vesparax manufacturers never specifically listed that only “10 tablets are a lethal dose” and this troll can’t produce any written information that this was stated. All Buster does is repeat this same lie over and over again cuz he has nothing else to post.
This moron says that 9 Vesparax pills can’t cause an overdose but then says that 9 to 10 pills are lethal. So, that means the 9 pills Jimi took were lethal which was determined in the autopsy.
BUSTER: Jason is doing his best to ignore the barbiturate science that says 9 tablets cannot kill a person with a known tolerance…
BUSTER: It said in plain writing that a lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
So, this moron says 9 tablets cannot kill you and then admits that 9 pills can kill you. There is nothing stated in “barbiturate science” that says 9 Vesparax can’t kill Jimi Hendrix. This is Buster’s own fake made up claim to deny Jimi’s lethal drug overdose. Buster is a troll who debunks his own lies and can’t worm his way out of it.
Buster’s sources for his hoax is Monika Dannemann and Sharon Lawrence who are frequent liars who Buster himself said are liars. Dr. Thurston never spoke of any wine. Sharon Lawrence made up a fake second hand quote in her fiction book about Dr. Thurston. No evidence of a phony wine drowning was ever detected amywhere inside Jimi Hendrix. Dr. Rufus Crompton confirmed Jimi died from a lethal overdose and the autopsy proved that, but Buster the clown wants to believe a claim from Monika Dannemann about her doctors. That’s what a moron Buster is. Monika’s doctors told her to only take 1/2 pill and Buster the clown thinks Jimi could survive 9 Vesparax pills which equals 32-35 Mandrax pills.
What human being could swallow 35 Mandrax pills and still live to talk about it? Nobody. Even a person who had a tolerance couldn’t cuz they would be dead. Buster the clown still says 35 Mandrax is still not enough pills for Jimi Hendrix. So this idiot says Jimi could tolerate 40 Mandrax pills which equals 10 Vesparax pills. But Buster isn’t done yet, when he claims Jimi could tolerate 3000mg up to 4000mg of Vesparax. That amazing claim would have Jimi swallowing up to 72 or more Mandrax pills. Could you imagine Jimi gobbling down 72 Mandrax pills and still being alive with no overdose with his phony “famous tolerance”? This is the insanity this idiot Buster brings out with his bogus claims. This is why Buster is laughed off of and banned from forums all over the internet.
Buster’s irate anger shows as he can’t produce any documents for any of the garbage he claims. All he posts are fantasy scenarios of what he believes in his crazy head and calls evidence. That was determined when he said his bogus “2000mg overdose threshold claim” would be ruled in an imaginary court room in his favor by fictional experts. His fake claims of wine is just more fiction he invented for this hoax. When he debunks his own lies he doubles down on them repeating them over and over like he did here.
No phony “2000mg overdose threshold” exists and the Vesparax manufacturers never listed that only 10 pills is a lethal dose. But this troll repeats this over and over like his fake wine stories that do not exist. 9 Vesparax pills equals 32 to 35 Mandrax pills and no doctor in the world would state a human could survive that amount of barbiturates.
If Buster still wants to deny this and make these bogus claims, let Buster swallow 40 pills and see what kind of tolerance he has. He can go on camera and make a video proving his phony “barbiturate science” and his asinine “2000mg overdose threshold” claim. Let this hoaxing troll Buster put his money where his mouth is.
Hi Jason, Insanity is the word alright. Buster is out to discredit anyone involved in this story and prove himself to be right. That’s all he’s interested in, and it doesn’t matter to him one bit who he drags down in the process. He doesn’t care at all what happened to Jimi he just wants his 15 minutes of fame. We’re just repeating the same thing over and over again but Buster couldn’t care less because he’s got put his nonsense out there any way he can.
You’re exactly right Ivana. Buster never cared about Jimi or his death. Buster is just obsessed with pushing his hoax trying to convince himself he is right by whatever means necessary. He has no documented evidence and he doesn’t care. Buster uses his own made up lies and just repeats them non stop calling them “facts” even when they are proven false. When those don’t work, he makes up new ones that are even more ridiculous. Buster says “my evidence” and “my science” which is just made up by him. This nut believes it’s real and only he is right, and like you said, he doesn’t care who he smears or discredits. He only wants to claim he is right by whatever means necessary even when it’s a made up fantasy scenario. That is true insanity.
Which of Monika’s doctors said that about the Vesparax and who was the autopsy doctor? Odd that Monika’s doctors told her to take no more than half a tablet and then doing a complete turnaround and saying it’s OK to take more than the recommended dosage. Dr. Teare is the one who performed the autopsy on Jimi and he had absolutely no doubt that the barbiturates caused Jimi’s death. Dr. Teare’s successor, Dr. Crompton, also said the Jimi had no chance of survival because of the liver damage caused by the toxic level of the barbiturate. I just can’t believe the rubbish that is being written by Dr. Yates that taking 10-15 pills of a drug that is so strong will not have dire consequences. This is irresponsible and downright dangerous and just plain stupid.
When the ambulance officers were called to the Samarkand Hotel what they saw and said was a drug overdose. They saw a corpse covered in vomit and dead for a few hours. What they didn’t see was a drunk passed out on top of the bed splattered with red wine. If Jimi had died as a consequence of drinking too much wine then that would have been all that was reported there would have been no mention of the drugs overdose at all. The wine would have been highly visible to all witnesses that morning but strange how this wine was absent from all reports at the time. There was no mention of the wine during Kathy’s important investigation, and Dr. Crompton was very specific about what he read in Dr. Teare’s autopsy report that the barbiturates contributed to Jimi’s death causing not only the chocking but also liver damage. Jimi didn’t stand a chance.
Buster continues to prove to himself that he isn’t a good hoaxer. Buster screwed up badly with his lies by admitting a lethal overdose for Jimi Hendrix is 9 pills. Now he doesn’t know what to do.
Buster’s fake “forensic science” isn’t good enough and he failed to make his “case”. Buster knows himself that Jimi wasn’t “murdered” with wine and now realizes that Jimi overdosed on 9 Vesparax pills which is why he is going crazy trying to deny it in his own mind.
BUSTER says: It said in plain writing that Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
Buster is telling himself that 9 pills are enough for Jimi to have a lethal overdose when he directly wrote 9 pills is a lethal dose above. Busters own self denials are not working cuz even he understands Jimi overdosed and there was no imaginary wine.
Buster doubted his own hoax which is why he said 9 pills are a lethal overdose. I’ve proved Buster wrong and showed him his “fake forensics” are weak. Buster has no clue about Vesparax, since I told him all he needs to know, which is why he didn’t understand how the Vesparax pill worked until I posted about it. Buster tries to deny what I posted but ends up admitting it anyway. Buster is a weak hoaxer and has let it be known he isn’t as good as he thought was pretending to be a Jimi Hendrix “expert”. Maybe in 11 more years Buster can rise to that level he wants to be at.
Hopefully Buster can find those phony missing 5 bottles of wine he invented for his hoax. Buster started off with 3 bottles, but even 3 bottles would be an improvement instead of nothing like he has now. Eh Buster?
Our “cuz” troll Jason denies hard firm medical science in its face…It’s all I would need in any credibly overseen venue to win this debate…Jason never answers the point if 9 Vesparax were enough to reach Lethal Dose then why did the manufacturer list a 10th tablet?…The reason is because 9 tablets was only 1800mg of barbiturate and 1800mg wasn’t enough to reach the well-known scientific 2000mg needed for Lethal Dose for barbiturates…Jason is obviously trying to get around the fact that if 9 tablets were a Lethal Dose the manufacturer would have listed 9 tablets and not mentioned a 10th…Jason avoids going out and researching whether 2000mg is the commonly-known Lethal Dose threshold for barbiturates because his denial trolling depends on intentional dumbing-down, ignorance, and stupidity…He’s not interested in the facts…He’s only interested in the trolling…
The source is the Vesparax manufacturer’s drug data that was published in Caesar Glebbeek’s ‘Until We Meet Again’ disinformation work…This is a clearly cited source but Jason keeps accusing me of making it up…Again – that would get Jason removed from any credible venue…Jason is trying to make his demented nay-say trolling the going standard but anyone can see he already lost this debate by being unable to answer the obviously vastly superior and more intelligent case…
Jason has failed to answer that in the two known barbiturate overdose cases Flyswatter presented where the victims had barbiturate levels well in to Lethal Dose range both victims did not vomit…In Glebbeek’s Underwriter Laboratory case histories 4 victims that took from 10 to 15 tablets did not die in less than 4 hours and none of them vomited…Jason still hasn’t answered the fact that Jimi only took 9 tablets and died in only 1 or 2 two hours – with extreme vomiting…No one has shown any other Vesparax death with those particulars…
When Jason gets to evidence that clearly refutes him he uses the silly trolling tactic of saying everyone was lying…Sharon Lawrence was telling the truth and if we could ever get Jason to confront Sharon and accuse her of lying we would quickly see who the trolling nut was and who was telling the truth…Dr Thurston did tell Jack Meehan that Jimi’s stomach was full of wine just like Dr Crompton told Kathy that Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…This, combined with Dr Siefert’s admission that Jimi was covered in wine, is proof that Dr Bannister’s witnessing was real…Jason is an obvious nut and nay-say troll…No intelligent person would take him or his booby trolling seriously and that is why you see no credible person endorsing his sick trolling…
Monika wrote in her book that she went to some German doctors and had them analyze whether her pills would have killed Jimi…They came to the same conclusion I did, that the pills would not have killed Jimi, for the same forensic reasons…
One of the autopsy doctors said that the amount of barbiturate found in Jimi at autopsy was “dangerous” but was not fatal…I would go through my books to find the source but I’m not going to bother because it would only be trolled by these two assholes anyway…In Monika’s TV interview with Selena Scott she referenced that doctor when she told Selena that the doctors who treated Jimi said the pills would not have killed him…
Same crap from a demented banned troll. Keeps repeating the same lies over and over and will not post any documented evidence for the lies he peddles. Only his hoaxing words and no evidence to prove. Always a troll who can never win in a debate.
Buster has already lost this debate months ago when he couldn’t produce any evidence for his phony wine. Buster defeated himself once again when he admitted that 9 Vesparax pills is a lethal dose.
BUSTER: It said in plain writing that a lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
JASON says: Here are the words of a moron who has defeated his own hoax. He says 9 tablets are a lethal dose. LOL.
BUSTER says: Our cuz” troll Jason denies hard firm medical science in its face…It’s all I would need in any credibly overseen venue to win this debate…Jason never answers the point if 9 Vesparax were enough to reach Lethal Dose then why did the manufacturer list a 10th tablet?…The reason is because 9 tablets was only 1800mg of barbiturate and 1800mg wasn’t enough to reach the well-known scientific 2000mg needed for Lethal Dose for barbiturates…Jason is obviously trying to get around the fact that if 9 tablets were a Lethal Dose the manufacturer would have listed 9 tablets and not mentioned a 10th…Jason avoids going out and researching whether 2000mg is the commonly-known Lethal Dose threshold for barbiturates because his denial trolling depends on intentional dumbing-down, ignorance, and stupidity…He’s not interested in the facts…He’s only interested in the trolling…
JASON says: Our hoaxing troll Buster keeps repeating the same bogus lies he made up for his fake evidence.
There is no “hard science” to what this joker is peddling. He makes up blatant lies and is unable to post documented evidence for what he is lying about.
The Vesparax manufacturers never listed a 10th tablet in order to reach a lethal dose. You are lying. I’ve asked you to post this informarion and you can’t cuz they never listed this anywhere.
The bogus “2000mg overdose threshold” claim is a fake claim made up by Buster and does not exist. People aren’t able to swallow 40 Mandrax pills in one setting cuz they would all die. This is Buster’s bogus 2000mg overdose threshold claim. It’s a total farce.
Buster can put his phony “2000mg overdose threshold” claim to the test. He can go on camera and make a video swallowing 2000mg of barbiturates to see if he meets his overdose threshold. How about it troll? Ready to take 40 pills?
Buster does not post facts, he posts crap like this that he makes up and calls “evidence”. He has been trolling for 11 years and gets banned everywhere he posts.
BUSTER says: The source is the Vesparax manufacturer’s drug data that was published in Caesar Glebbeek’s ‘Until We Meet Again’ disinformation work…This is a clearly cited source but Jason keeps accusing me of making it up…Again – that would get Jason removed from any credible venue…Jason is trying to make his demented nay-say trolling the going standard but anyone can see he already lost this debate by being unable to answer the obviously vastly superior and more intelligent case…
JASON says: Buster lies and fabricates the source and will not post the source here on this site cuz he is lying about what it says. Buster is banned from every forum and site for this type of trolling behavior. Sorry troll, nobody “loses” to your fake crap you peddle.
BUSTER says: Jason has failed to answer that in the two known barbiturate overdose cases Flyswatter presented where the victims had barbiturate levels well in to Lethal Dose range both victims did not vomit…In Glebbeek’s Underwriter Laboratory case histories 4 victims that took from 10 to 15 tablets did not die in less than 4 hours and none of them vomited…Jason still hasn’t answered the fact that Jimi only took 9 tablets and died in only 1 or 2 two hours – with extreme vomiting…No one has shown any other Vesparax death with those particulars…
JASON says: You are “Flyswatter” which is your other fake alias that you troll with. Buster has failed to provide correct information since he can only lie and make up fake claims that do not exist.
BUSTER says: When Jason gets to evidence that clearly refutes him he uses the silly trolling tactic of saying everyone was lying…Sharon Lawrence was telling the truth and if we could ever get Jason to confront Sharon and accuse her of lying we would quickly see who the trolling nut was and who was telling the truth…Dr Thurston did tell Jack Meehan that Jimi’s stomach was full of wine just like Dr Crompton told Kathy that Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…This, combined with Dr Siefert’s admission that Jimi was covered in wine, is proof that Dr Bannister’s witnessing was real…Jason is an obvious nut and nay-say troll…No intelligent person would take him or his booby trolling seriously and that is why you see no credible person endorsing his sick trolling…
JASON says: This troll Buster has called these same people liars and uses their lies for his hoax cuz Buster is a sick troll. A total fraud who makes you laugh.
Buster: Monika is a liar
Scrum Drum: Sharon is a liar.
Scrum Drum: Don’t trust Sharon. There’s something seriously wrong with her.
Buster: Crompton is lying.
JASON says: So, this sick demented troll Buster, who uses Scrum Drum as his trolling alias called Sharon Lawrence a liar and said not to trust her. Now he is using Sharon’s lies for his hoax on this site. Buster is a troll that calls these people liars and uses the lies he likes for his hoax. That’s why no poster agrees with this nut except his trolling alias accounts like “Flyswatter”, “Albert Doyle”, etc. This clown is banned from every site and forum he posts on for this type of stuff. Nobody says this loon is credible.
BUSTER says: Monika wrote in her book that she went to some German doctors and had them analyze whether her pills would have killed Jimi…They came to the same conclusion I did, that the pills would not have killed Jimi, for the same forensic reasons…
JASON says: Haha Monika Dannemann. Forensics already proved Jimi died from a lethal overdose.
BUSTER says: One of the autopsy doctors said that the amount of barbiturate found in Jimi at autopsy was “dangerous” but was not fatal…I would go through my books to find the source but I’m not going to bother because it would only be trolled by these two assholes anyway…In Monika’s TV interview with Selena Scott she referenced that doctor when she told Selena that the doctors who treated Jimi said the pills would not have killed him…
JASON says: LMAO. No doctor ever said this and this troll can only deny real forensic science while agreeing with known liar Monika Dannemann. 0.7mg is above lethal and your hoaxing words mean nothing. The overdose is in the history books forever and the lies you peddle will never change it.
Buster’s dead debunked hoax is hilarious, all he can do is recite the same fake nonsense for each post after he already admitted 9 Vesparax pills is a lethal dose.
BUSTER: It said in plain writing that a lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…
JASON says: This moron admits 9 pills are lethal and now he makes up new fake lies pretending it isn’t. Absolutely hilarious!
Buster said he wasn’t going to go through his book to find the source of his information, sorry misinformation, in other words he doesn’t have these books because they don’t exist.
Exactly. Just like the quotes Buster said he was going to find where he said the ambulance men were talking about the imaginary wine. Those quotes don’t exist either. This serial troll Buster makes up his own crap and he never posts any evidence since there is none. No manufacturer ever stated you need 10 Vesparax pills to have a lethal overdose. But this troll Buster keeps repeating it anyway.
Has it occurred to Buster that Monika felt guilt over the fact that her barbiturates caused Jimi’s death and that is why she said that about having her pills analysed. She was trying to distance herself from any blame. All of the things that Monika said about the events that morning have been discredited. Buster is siding with Monika with this one because it suits his purpose. He is Flyswatter trying to make it look as if he has support from others when in fact he doesn’t.
The things that Monika said about that morning that have been revealed to be untrue: 1. She was present when the ambulance arrived. 2. Jimi was alive when the ambulance was called. 3. She traveled in the ambulance. 4. Jimi was placed in a chair with his head back. 4. She spoke to a nurse in casualty. 5. She accused the doctors of not treating Jimi with a tracheotomy. 5. She accused the doctors of racism. 6. She said the Mafia killed Jimi to Caesar Glebeek. 7. She was engaged to Jimi. 8. Jimi was living with her at the Samarkand. 9. Her pills didn’t kill Jimi although the dosage is half a tablet Jimi took 9. 10. Her pills were not that strong even though her doctors warned her never to take more than the recommended dosage.
Hi Ivana,
I’m still laughing at Buster’s ridiculous denial claims of Jimi’s overdose using Monika Dannemann as his source.
Jimi died from a lethal overdose in 1970. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed to the world that Jimi died from a drug overdose shortly after he was brought in. It was that obvious and they confirmed it. The post mortem made it official with the forensic findings.
Then 20 years later we have a few morons trying to make after the fact claims saying it didn’t happen.
Buster says Monika claimed her doctors told her 20 years later that Jimi couldn’t have died from 9 Vesparax pills. These are the same doctors who told her in 1970 not to take more than 1 pill cuz anymore would lead to an overdose. So, Monika and Buster wants us to believe Jimi could swallow 35 Mandrax pills and still be alive to tell about it. 35 Mandrax pills equals 9 Vesparax pills. And this moron Buster says Jimi could tolerate 35 Mandrax pills at one time when Jimi nearly died taking only 5. So much for that “famous tolerance”.
Who the hell can swallow 35 barbiturates in one setting and still be alive? Nobody. That’s why Buster will always lose.
This is the crap that Buster peddles as his “facts” and his “science’ which are asinine claims from Monika Dannemann and the crap Buster makes up himself.
Hi Jason, There’s a saying if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth. Well not with us we can spot a lie hundreds of miles off, as we’re to smart to fall for Busters tricks. The manufacturers of Vesparax were very aware of just how potent their drug actually was since the recommended dose is half a tablet. Then we have a clown like Buster who has no medical credentials telling us swallowing nine pills the equivalent of 35 Mandrax isn’t lethal.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates, the hoaxing phony doctor, makes abundant character attacks but still has no documented evidence for his phony hoax. In this episode, the hoaxer posts many blatant lies but ends up admitting that Hydroxyzine was put into Vesparax to strengthen and lengthen the life of the Brallobarbital.
BUSTER says: Jason is a troll and pretends we don’t see him not answering the fact that the London Coroner’s Office doctors who were trying to say the Vesparax killed Jimi as part of a cover-up also omitted the Hydroxyzine from their cause of death reasoning…The reason for that is because they knew that they medically couldn’t get away with it…They knew the Hydroxyzine was not contributory on a forensic basis to the cause of death…If it were they would have said so because they were trying to contrive a drug cause for Jimi’s death…Jason ignores and avoids this in his trolling response because he knows it is true and he can’t answer it…Jason accuses me of lying but the reference is right there in the source I cited and is just as I said…So after falsely accusing me of lying and not credibly answering to a correctly-cited source Jason is allowed to ignore it, not admit he is wrong, and then not admit the correct argument I making…Justin provides quite an accommodating venue for sick trolls…
JASON says: Buster is typing away with his same old hoaxing script. The only troll here is “Buster” who gets regularly banned from every site and forum he posts on. There was no “cover up”, yet this hoaxer still types it anyway pretending there was. Buster provides no source and only his own fantasy scenario which he believes in his crazy head.
Hydroxyzine taken in large doses is fatal, especially in combination with large doses of Secobarbital and brallobarbital that was all included in Vesparax. The dosage was 1/2 to 1 tablet and Jimi took 9 which is an overdose. All this information is medically documented and is accessible to read. Buster the clown can only make phony denials saying “9 pills isn’t enough” but then debunks his own claim by stating 9 Vesparax pills is a lethal dose.
BUSTER says: Because Jason only found out about this topic when he decided to troll this comments section he is ignoring that the reference for the Vesparax manufacturer’s product information was Caesar Glebbeek’s ‘Until We Meet Again’ (2011) publication…Jason is seeking to lie and deny so he ignores the reference, makes no effort to locate and study it, and then comes back and trollishly accuses me of making up references…Again, this demented dishonesty meant solely for trolling purposes and denying correct information would get this sick asshole Jason rightfully booted from any credibly moderated debate or court room…Remember – Jason is trolling and doesn’t provide any source for his crazy denial while ignoring my proven sources…
JASON says: This is another blatant lie Buster uses for his character attacks against me. Buster also fraudulently lies about the information Ceasar Glebbeek wrote in his publication. Ceasar and nobody else has ever stated that a person needs “10 Vesparax pills to have a lethal overdose”. Buster has made up this lie for his hoax twisting what was written so he can smear the real evidence for his hoax. Buster is unable to cite from a legitimate source in writing his phony claim that a “person needs 10 Vesparax pills to reach a lethal overdose” which he claims was written by Vesparax manufacturers. This phony claim does not exist and was never written by anyone. This hoaxer is blatantly lying. Now Buster goes even further to blatantly lie. Everything I post is documented evidence that is sourced from legitimate media sources, medical sources, and credible witnesses. This fraud Buster only makes up fantasy scenarios in his crazy head or uses garbage claims from fraud sources written in conspiracy books. This is why this hoaxer “Buster” is banned from every site and forum. Then he pathetically whines again to have me banned for exposing his lies. Buster is a clown and a hypocrite.
BUSTER says: There is zero credible science Jason could offer to show that the Hydroxyzine was added to Vesparax “to strengthen the Brallobarbital”…Keep in mind the denial troll Jason knew nothing about this subject until he decided to troll this thread…So his posture of teaching me about Vesparax is all part of his sick trolling game…Truth is I taught him all he knows about Vesparax…All references to Vesparax that I’ve read say the antihistamine was added because the barbiturate was sedating so strongly that people were not expectorating flem while under the drug’s suppressive influence…All sources I’ve read say the antihistamine was added in order to keep people from building up too much flem during sedation…Jason cannot produce any reference to the antihistamine being added to enhance the Brallobarbital because he is a nut who made that up in order to make his trolling claim more damaging to the truth…If Jason had any understanding of the drug science he is mangling the Brallobarbitone needed no enhancing because it was designed to lay back and come on later as a slow-release barbiturate…
JASON says: Buster is a clownish moron who is not to be taken seriously and it’s obvious he knows nothing about drugs and how they function. This joker has taught me nothing and that’s absolutely hilarious. All this joker can talk about is his made up phony claims of wine and his fantasy “2000mg overdose threshold”.
Here this moron “Buster” says the documented medical information about Hydroxyzine strengthening and lengthening the Brallobarbital is false, but then this stupid idiot admits that it was “designed to lay back and come on later as a slow-release barbiturate”. When it is coming back that means it has to be strengthened to do so. And when it’s coming back later on, it is being lengthened to do so. This ignorance shows “Buster” to be the total moron he is knowing nothing about Vesaprax. Buster’s weak and pathetic troll game he is still trying to run makes him look even more like a fool. So, this idiot tries to deny medical science but then ends up admitting it’s true. Buster, you are the are the ultimate clown joker.
So, this means that Hydroxyzine was added in Vesparax to work in accordance with the Secobarbital which strengthens and lengthens the Brallobarbital just like the documented information clearly states. And this idiot “Buster” is trying to deny it, but then admits that’s the purpose of the Hydroxyzine. There really needs to be a mercy rule for this joker who is easily defeated all the time. Buster can’t even keep his hoaxing claims straight, he always debunks himself. Hilarious!
The documented information on Vesparax clearly indicates that Vesparax was a 3 combination pill in which Hydroxyzine worked in accordance with the Secobarbital which strengthened the brallobarbital making it last longer. This was the purpose of the pill and why it included 3 drugs which was more powerful than any other barbiturate. This information on Vesparax can easily be referenced.
BUSTER says: Jason is a trolling nut who is pulling his trolling claims out of his ass he he goes along…He is asking us to believe that his very obviously made-up claim that Hydroxyzine was fatal in combination with amphetamine was somehow missed by the autopsists at Jimi’s autopsy and Inquest and not mentioned – even though they were contriving the medical science and seeking to blame the drugs for Jimi’s death…Jason is using this demented trolling tactic to avoid the fact a minor amount of stimulant (amphetamine) would be part of the treatment for a dangerous Vesparax dose and would have only added to the forensic balance in Jimi’s favor that made overdose impossible…Jason still hasn’t answered this in his attempt to avoid it with obscuring blather-trolling and denial…
JASON says: Every medical professional concludes that 9 Vesparax pills is a lethal dose and an overdose of Hydroxyzine is fatal which causes fatal arrhythmia. This was clearly indicated and documented in Jimi’s autopsy with the lethal 0.7mg level and the fatal 3.9 reading in his liver. So, nothing was “missed” as this joker fraudulently tries to say.
This moron “Buster” has no clue about the fatal side effects of mixing and overdosing on drugs. This clown believes that people including Jimi Hendrix can swallow massive amounts of milligrams of a dangerous drug and nothing will happen to them. 9 Vesparax pills is the equivalent of 32-35 Mandrax pills and nobody can take that many pills and still survive. But this joker “Buster” who doesn’t know anything still says it’s not “enough pills”. He says Jimi can swallow even more pills. Buster is a clown and this is only his own fantasy opinion of what he wants you to believe. He has no documents or science he can ever cite. Every single piece of documented science refutes this hoaxing troll who ends up admitting he is wrong and debunking his own hoax by stating 9 Vesparax pills is a lethal dose. Freaking Hilarious!
Jason, you’re done great work here but unfortunately Buster doesn’t need to play by the rules because he’s concocted everything with these things just figments of his overactive imagination. It’s hard to reason with someone like that because there’s no logic in the way they think and present their information. He’s like a mouse who goes around in circles on his treadmill never being able to stop and get off. In this weird case11 years of the same thing.
Thanks Ivana.
Buster makes up his own fake rules like his own fake evidence but it’s always good to refute his bogus lies he makes up. He isn’t going to be reasonable and is always going to deny the truth with his fake claims. He’s done it for 11 years.
Buster has no clue about Jimi Hendrix making an absurd comment like this. Buster seems to be taking a liking to Monika Dannemann lately, he keeps using her lies for his dead hoax when before he used to hate her posting that she is a pathological liar. Now Buster is using her pathological lies cuz Buster is a troll.
BUSTER says: One of the autopsy doctors said that the amount of barbiturate found in Jimi at autopsy was “dangerous” but was not fatal…I would go through my books to find the source but I’m not going to bother because it would only be trolled by these two assholes anyway…In Monika’s TV interview with Selena Scott she referenced that doctor when she told Selena that the doctors who treated Jimi said the pills would not have killed him…
JASON says: This is hilarious. So Buster, “the self proclaimed foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix” doesn’t even know this autopsy doctor’s name? Wow. Not much of an expert is he?
Buster names an “unknown doctor” making another bogus claim. That’s hilarious. What’s more hilarious, is this clown thinks there was more than one doctor who performed the autopsy.
The only doctor who performed the autopsy on Jimi Hendrix was Dr. Teare, and he did not ever say Jimi’s drug overdose was not fatal since he detected a fatal 0.7mg reading and confirmed to the media that Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning.
So, who are these other imaginary autopsy doctors Buster speaks of? Maybe they were the ones to find the imaginary wine.
Buster the trolling hoaxer won’t find the quote cuz it doesn’t exist. 0.7mg is a lethal reading and no doctor in the world would ever say that number is not fatal.
Buster must be getting Alzheimer’s since he believes Monika was speaking with an unnamed doctor at the hospital who said the pills wouldn’t have killed Jimi. Maybe Buster believes Monika rode in the ambulance with John Saua and Reginal Jones who said “Jimi was breathing and just sleeping and would be ok”. Even though Jimi was already dead for 7 1/2 hours.
Buster has tied himself to Monika Dannemann and her lies haha. That’s what happens when a trolling hoaxer is desperate to use any old lie he can think of with Monika Dannemann as the last resort.
Ceasar Glebbeek and Monika Dannemann….Buster’s two new idols! LMAO
How low would you stoop to get a point across? Just read what Buster says. He believes none of the evidence therefore he supplants it with his own distorted opinions. Buster is not supplying anyone with information but rather his take on the events that morning. It’s fair to say that Caesar Glebeeck was a supporter of Monika inviting her to speak on radio where she tried to blame the Mafia for Jimi’s death. Caesar’s publication ‘Until We Meet Again’ points out that there is no evidence that Monika had anything to do with Jimi’s death. Then we have Buster making all sorts of dumb and inaccurate accusations of murder against various people.
Buster takes evidence or claims and adds his own lies to it. He will stoop as low as he can to distort the facts with his disinformation campaign.
Jason is doing infantile trolling that is beneath the dignity of a response…The manufacturer’s product information is documented in Glebbeek’s disinformation work ‘Until We Meet Again’…Jason is doing silly boy’s trolling and saying I am lying and making up that reference so I will produce it for him…In other words Jason is a troll who first found out about this subject when he decided to troll this comments section…He hasn’t seen the reference and is therefore ignorant of the subject matter…
On Facebook Britisher Jim Hawthorn said this thread was a good example of a murder advocate being refuted by a good debunker…He was referring to Jason…However Hawthorn doesn’t enter the thread and inform Jason that my product manufacturer reference is valid and does say what I wrote…Hawthorn has read ‘Until We Meet Again’ and has seen that reference…
If a person denies a correct reference and its information he forfeits the debate…Jason has failed badly to answer good arguments of evidence and therefore loses the debate…His idiotic trolling only emphasizes that even more…There’s no point in responding to a nut who says everybody is lying…
Buster makes himself look even more like a clown with a response like this.
Buster was trolling saying “unnamed autopsy doctors” stated that the amount of barbiturate found in Jimi at autopsy was “dangerous” but was not fatal…and Buster would go through his books to find the source but he wasn’t going to do it cuz he would be trolled for it.
This is exactly why Buster is a troll and is not to be taken seriously. Buster just makes stuff up pretending it exists and then says he isn’t going to bother looking for the source cuz he would only be trolled for it. This is Buster’s trolling game. He makes up a fake source and then makes a bogus excuse as for why he won’t produce it. It’s pathetic and he only deserves mockery for being a fool.
Buster hilariously claims there was more than one autopsy doctor. Then Buster invents this fake made up quote of what this “unnamed autopsy doctor” said. Well, there was only one man who performed the autopsy on Jimi Hendrix, and that man was Dr. Teare. No source or quote exists of Buster’s lies cuz Dr. Teare never stated that the barbiturates in Jimi Hendrix was not fatal. This is a fraudulent lie and Buster makes it up for his hoax as he trolls the real evidence of Jimi’s death. This is why Buster is not to be taken seriously.
Then to further Buster’s trolling, he said he was going to look for the “source” in his books when he knows damn well the source doesn’t even exist. After that, he says he isn’t going to bother looking for it cuz he would be “trolled for it”. Buster can’t “look for it” cuz it doesn’t exist. This is how this joker trolls with his hoax.
So, Buster makes up a lie about imaginary autopsy doctors stating a fake quote for which Buster needs to look for this fake source in books that doesn’t exist. Buster is a troll and is making everything up including his phony wine that doesn’t exist either.
BUSTER says: The manufacturer’s product information is documented in Glebbeek’s disinformation work ‘Until We Meet Again’…Jason is doing silly boy’s trolling and saying I am lying and making up that reference so I will produce it for him…In other words Jason is a troll who first found out about this subject when he decided to troll this comments section…He hasn’t seen the reference and is therefore ignorant of the subject matter…
JASON says: So, Buster calls Ceasar Glebbeek’s work “disinformation” but uses it for his hoax. That’s hilarious. Buster says the work is false but still wants to use it anyway. That’s how desperate Buster is. Using Buster’s own words, this work should be disqualified from being used as a source since Buster says it’s disinformation. Buster is a hypocrite and will use anybody for his hoax even a man like Ceasar Glebbeek who Buster passionately hates. Buster also stated whoever “quotes or credits Glebbeek disinformation work is not to be taken seriously”. And here is Buster the clown doing the same thing he railed against for years. Buster now ties himself to Monika Dannemann’s lies as well. Buster is truly desperate trying to hang on to his dead hoax or he has Alzheimer’s and doesn’t know what he is saying.
Yes, Buster is lying about what is stated in Ceasar’s publication which is exactly why I know that he is lying. Buster knows he is lying as well which is why he won’t post the information here on this site. If Buster thought he could prove me wrong he would have no trouble posting that information. His avoidance and refusal to do so proves he is a troll just furthering my victory against him even more.
Buster is using his same phony tactics trying to call me a “troll” and says “I don’t know the subject matter”. That’s hilarious since that’s all Buster can post since he has no real evidence to produce. I guess he feels phony character attacks makes up for evidence he can’t provide. I know the subject matter better than Buster does, which is why I make him look like a clown each time he makes up his lies for his hoax.
The fact is, Ceasar Glebbeek stated that 9 Vesparax pills are a lethal dose which was the cause of Jimi’s death confirmed by the manufacturers, and it’s why Buster has held a personal vendetta against this man ever since trying to attack his credibility. It’s fraudulent how Buster plagiarized this work adding his own lies instead. That’s why Buster refuses to post the information on this site. Buster knows full well he is lying.
BUSTER says: On Facebook Britisher Jim Hawthorn said this thread was a good example of a murder advocate being refuted by a good debunker…He was referring to Jason…However Hawthorn doesn’t enter the thread and inform Jason that my product manufacturer reference is valid and does say what I wrote…Hawthorn has read ‘Until We Meet Again’ and has seen that reference…
JASON says: Yes, I have done a great job debunking your lies and all the readers have noticed that as well. Your reference is not valid since you are lying about what it said.
BUSTER says: If a person denies a correct reference and its information he forfeits the debate…Jason has failed badly to answer good arguments of evidence and therefore loses the debate…His idiotic trolling only emphasizes that even more…There’s no point in responding to a nut who says everybody is lying…
JASON says: As usual, the debunked troll scampers away when he is forced to produce documented evidence for his lies. Your reference is not correct since you are lying about it. You also call this reference “disinformation” so you are telling us it’s not correct. Then Buster makes up his own fake rules saying I “lose the debate”. One of my favorite lines Buster uses.
Yes, the sources Buster uses are liars and I’ve posted all the lies they’ve told. But Buster ignores their lies and still repeats them as facts.
Tappy Wright, Fraud Bannister, Monika Dannemann, Sharon Lawrence….all of these people are liars and I’ve posted Buster’s quotes of him calling Monika Dannemann and Sharon Lawrence a liar, but he uses their lies anyway cuz it fits with his phony murder hoax. That’s why Buster is just a troll.
Buster has lost his hoax months ago when he was unable to produce evidence of his phony imaginary wine. Buster continued to debunk his own hoax with his own made up lies that he ended up debunking himself. Buster has zero credibility and anybody reading knows it.
All Buster can do is deny the real forensic evidence that proves Jimi Hendrix died from a lethal overdose. Buster whines the “pills weren’t enough” as he makes up his own fake mg numbers trying to pretend Jimi could tolerate more drugs. He uses lies from Sharon Lawrence and Monika Dannemann that contradict his own hoax since everything he uses are all false after the fact claims.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from drug overdose. They aren’t going to put out false information about the death of a world famous musician to destroy their credibility.
The autopsy performed by Dr. Teare confirmed the lethal drug overdose with the 0.7mg above toxic level and the 3.9 reading in Jimi’s liver. If you look at Jimi’s autopsy findings, everything that was documented is consistent with a lethal drug overdose. A “wine drowning” would be completely different since the wine would have instantly killed Hendrix. The suffocating of vomit comes from a drug overdose. A wine drowning would be drowned in pure wine with no vomit. Buster the clown in his hoaxing seemed to have missed that important factor.
Hi Jason, To put it simply Buster is a liar. He fabricates his own phony evidence hoping people will buy into what he says. That’s how this hoaxer operates. He’ll distort and manipulate the real facts and replace them with his own made up ones. We’re seeing proof of this over and over again on this thread. We stick to the official reports whereas he doesn’t. He’ll never be able to produce any evidence because it’s all made up in his head-beyond that it doesn’t exist.
You summed it up perfectly Ivana.
Buster is a phony. He uses phony alias names, pushing a phony theory, with phony made up stories. When you ask him for proof he makes lame excuses and runs away.
A true phony.
Do you really think the Hendrix family would be sitting idly twiddling their thumbs and not have further investigated any suspicion, allegations or accusations of murder? Janie never bought into these claims of murder of her brother. If anyone had the resources to bring about a further investigation at a cold case level then it would have been Jimi’s family. But they didn’t because they were satisfied and accepted the official report. In an interview Janie said she didn’t blame anyone for Jimi’s death because it was an accident.
Vesparax was a powerful pill which Jimi never took before. Vesparax was not meant to be taken in large amounts all at once. Vesparax was taken in specific doses that was determined by a doctor.
Buster is trying to claim that the manufacturers said it was safe to take 9 Vesparax pills all at once which is an overdose. That is absurd since the information in the package states the recommended dosage is 1/2 to 1 pill.
9 Vesparax pills equals about 35 Mandrax pills and no manufacturer or doctor would endorse swallowing 35 barbiturates in one setting. If anybody still thinks Jimi or any human can’t overdose on 35 barbiturates then you should go have your head examined.
Exactly Jason, no doctor would be prescribing an overdose they would be struck off for medical negligence. Buster’s claims are becoming more and more outrageous and nonsensical. Really weird stuff. All meds come with the warning take strictly as directed otherwise you’re asking for trouble.
The thing that seems more ridiculous than anything is this famous tolerance that Jimi was supposed to have had to drugs. Where did this come from and what’s the criteria exactly-how would you find this out? Just another dumb thing to say.
Buster needs to increase the number of pills and mg’s so he can pretend Jimi “didn’t have enough”. That’s why he keeps using the 10th pill nonsense and made up the phony 2000mg stuff.
On the medicine labels it tells you not to exceed X amount of pills in a 24 hour period. It doesn’t tell you to take them all at once. You are supposed to take the recommended dose which is usually 2.
The Vesparax dosage was 1/2 to 1 pill that was written in the information. It didn’t say to take 9 pills all at once. 9 pills are an overdose and anybody trying to argue that it isn’t is a complete idiot.
A Vesparax overdose causes difficulty in breathing and Jimi took 9 pills so that would make it more difficult especially since he was vomiting.
The autopsy results showed all evidence of a drug overdose especially the in the upper respiratory area and around the heart.
If this was a phony wine drowning. Wine would be poured down Jimi to kill him and he would instantly die from the liquid. He wouldn’t be laying on his back struggling to breathe and vomiting. That’s why this wine hoax is a joke.
This “famous tolerance” claim is nonsense. It’s a scam that Buster uses so he can deny Jimi’s drug overdose.
“Jimi had a famous tolerance so he could never die from only 9 pills” is just a bogus excuse as a denial to run his scam. You can’t use absolutes when dealing with an overdose saying you “can’t die”. It’s a losing argument cuz anything can happen when an overdose happens.
Buster claims he read in a book where an “unnamed friend” said Jimi had a “famous tolerance to drugs”. Basically he made it up himself. So, Buster uses that for his hoax to deny Jimi’s overdose saying he “couldn’t die from the pills, it had to be the wine”. And so he makes up his lies of imaginary wine for his hoax.
That claim holds no weight and I’ve already pointed that out. I know people who claim they can drink someone under the table and then it turns out they can’t. So, it’s just phony bragging. Other people can only have two drinks and if another person can have three drinks then that person to them has a “famous tolerance to alcohol” since they can drink more. It’s a pointless claim and is not scientific.
This is just a bogus weak argument that Buster uses for his denial efforts of Jimi’s overdose. Jimi couldn’t even handle 5 Mandrax pills when he nearly overdosed a few weeks earlier and Buster the clown thinks Jimi could swallow 30 more and still survive. The entire bogus claim is laughable. And “Buster” is this big world’s expert” LOL.
Hi Jason, We both know the effects the Vesparax had on Jimi. Just the fact that he was lying on his back fully clothed covered in vomit spells overdose. The nine pills Jimi took knocked him out immediately and death followed soon after. This is certainly what happens when you don’t follow the manufacturers or doctors advice. The high dosage of the Vesparax would have slowed Jimi’s heart to a point of no return and then on to destroy Jimi’s other organs. Prescription medication when abused is just as toxic as illegal drugs I would think.
Hi Ivana,
The point this hoaxer doesn’t understand is that with that large amount of barbiturates in your system at one time it will destroy your liver. The reading in Jimi’s liver was toxic so even.if he didn’t choke on his own vomit, his liver was already ruined from that amount and would have died anyway.
Even the warning labels on over the counter medicine warns people that if you exceed the amount it will cause liver damage.
None of the people who worked closely with Jimi suspected foul play regarding Jimi’s death. Eddie Kramer, Chas Chandler, Noel Redding, Mitch Mitchell, Billy Cox, Buddy Miles, Eric Barrett, Gerry Stickells or the women Jimi had friendships with. Kathy’s investigation didn’t uncover a murder plot it confirmed the initial findings of Dr. Teare’s autopsy results. None of the journalists or biographers around that time ever mentioned murder in regards to Jimi’s death. Then along comes a stupid book written by Tappy Wright decades after the event that said Jimi was murdered with red wine by his manager and his accomplice who supposedly were undercover agents involved in a cover up. Who would be dumb enough to fall for a plot like that?
Brian Doyle aka Buster would.
None of these phony tales were even talked about in the 70’s or the 80’s. Not one word about wine until Fraud Bannister made it up in January 1992. That’s why I always say thee are post 1992 false claims cuz that’s when it started.
Tappy made up the bogus tale to sell his crappy book which proved him to be a fraud since Jeffery was in Spain. That also proves he wasn’t close to Jeffery or he would have known he was in Spain on that morning.
That story was proved to be a fraud and then you have Buster making up his own bogus invented stories of government “murder” against Jimi and all the fake stories he invented pushing his dead hoax. it’s all made up nonsense cuz nobody speaks of this except Buster.
BUSTER says: Monika wrote in her book that she went to some German doctors and had them analyze whether her pills would have killed Jimi…They came to the same conclusion I did, that the pills would not have killed Jimi, for the same forensic reasons…
JASON says: Buster ties himself to Monika Dannemann and her lies. What a way to end your hoax. Agreeing with Monika Dannemann and her imaginary doctors when you always called this woman a liar. Hilarious!
The leftover Vesparax pills and he dried vomit blankets were collected by the coroner’s officer on 9/18/70 and were analyzed. The analysis showed Vesparax on the blankets and they said nothing about wine. Also, the 9 pills were proven to be lethal as Jimi’s dead body showed the results of the lethal overdose.
Hi Jason, I’ve been reading about Monika’s behaviour at Harvey’s place where she stormed out and then started verbally abusing Jimi. Jimi drank some French red wine according to Harvey and then had a rice meal there. This explains the alcohol level in Jimi’s urine and blood and the rice in his stomach. This has nothing to do with the imaginary wine poured over him or a possible motive for Monika to kill Jimi after he started chatting up another girl there. Monika placed a great deal of importance on her relationship with Jimi which really only amounted to a few days. It was more of a fling by the sounds of things. I think she didn’t want to be seen as just another one night stand so she invented the engagement story. Jimi threw up and died in Monika’s apartment from her Vesparax nothing more. That’s the sad reality of this story;the alternative story is fake.
Hi Ivana,
Yeah, Monika made a lot more out of the relationship than it was. Not one person close to Jimi ever said he had any intentions of marrying her. She invented all those things she made up in her head.
She was quite verbally abusive to Jimi at Harvey’s and even he said he thought she could be violent. She also caused a scene at Kameron’s party and then tried to invent an image of them both being happy and in love when Jimi only knew her for a few days,
Monika was a strange woman and Eric Burdon said she was a stalker and i think Ginger Baker also said she wasn’t mentally stable.
Which brings up another point here, Vesparax was used as an anti psychotic medication for people with Schizophrenia and bi polar disorder which explains her behavior. It was also used as a sedative as a powerful sleeping pill since it was used for both the disorder and to sleep. So Jimi overdosed on that medication not even knowing what it was since people who were on it were supposed to stay on their normal doses. So, if they skipped a dose they were supposed to start again the next day or they could overdose if they took too many pills in a short amount of time. Jimi took 9 all at once
Interesting information about the side effects of Vesparax no wonder it was pulled from the market.
Vesparax information and warnings:
Vesparax is used for treating schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. It may also be used for other conditions as determined by your doctor.
Use Vesparax as directed by your doctor. Check the label on the medicine for exact dosing instructions. Even the slightest overdose may cause coma or death.
Vesparax is an antipsychotic. It works by altering the balance of certain chemicals that occur naturally in the brain, which are responsible for thinking and behavior.
If you miss a dose of Vesparax, take it as soon as possible. If it is almost time for your next dose, skip the missed dose and go back to your regular dosing schedule. Do not take 2 doses at once. An overdose may cause coma or death.
Do not take Vesparax you if drink alcohol or take other medications. Serious side effects or death may occur.
The instructions were written in German so this is translated. This came on the pamphlet so I assume the dosage and other information came on the packaging and the label. Wonder if a lot of people forgot about their dose and doubled up on it.
Hi Jason, Really detailed information here about how potent Vesparax actually is. The part about an overdose causing coma or death is precisely what happened to Jimi.
Hi Ivana,
Also the part about drinking alcohol and taking other medication. Jimi was over the legal alcohol limit and took a powerful amphetamine before he took an overdose of 9 Vesparax. That’s what proved to be fatal.
Vesparax wasn’t meant to be taken in a large dosage all at once. It was only to be taken as recommended or by a doctor that had the patient on a specific dosage.
There’s no point in seriously responding to nuts, nay-sayers, or trolls…Jason lost this debate when he was unable to answer why the Vesparax manufacturer listed a 10th tablet…Jason is obviously a nut who is not playing with a full deck because he responded that I was lying about the Vesparax product manufacturer’s data as shown in Glebbeek’s ‘Until We Meet Again’…Jason is getting away with dismissing good witnessing and evidence by trolling that all the sources are lying…No credible Hendrix expert has ever alleged those sources were lying and those who are personally familiar with the Hendrix world and this subject know they aren’t…Jason is just a nut who is accusing people of lying instead of admitting their evidence…If I were moderator of this room Jason and Ivana would be banned so the public would not be subjected to their idiotic denial trolling and the subject matter could be brought back to serious content…
About a decade ago Janie Hendrix was asked about Jimi’s death and she responded “The way Jimi died that is told of in the official story is not the real way he died”…
Rubbish. As if Janie would let any suspicion go and not have it investigated further. I suggest you read the side effects of Vesparax and then let’s see if you still write this idiotic nonsense about that 10th pill. Here we go again about having Jason and I banned if you can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen. You’re the one writing this continual made up garbage we stick to the real story.
Buster the man of many pseudonyms has been banned by moderators from every site and forum he posts on. He is only here to troll, disrupt, and deny the real evidence and instead wants to post made up crap from his garage phony murder hoax . He doesn’t want real evidence to be shown cuz it destroys his bogus hoax.
No pharmaceutical manufacturer said you needed a 10th pill to die. This is an absolute lie. I’ve asked this troll to Buster to post this information right here in the site and he refuses cuz it does not exist. And he knows it. Ceasar Glebbeek said that 9 Vesparax pills are lethal and Jimi died from them. That’s what outraged Buster and he had held a personal vendetta against the man ever since.
I just posted the information and warnings from the Vesparax pamphlet translated from German. And nowhere does it say anything about 10 pills. It says an overdose is fatal and to only take the prescribed dosage on the label or by the doctor. You want this information suppressed cuz it destroys your hoax.
You are not the moderator Buster, so stop whining and crying that you want us banned so you can spread your bogus conspiracy crap.
Buster wants to have free reign so he can post crap like “autopsy doctors said Jimi’s overdose wasn’t fatal but I need to look in my books to find the quote”.
More fake quotes from Buster is all he can post.
Nobody takes you seriously Buster. Everybody reading knows you are a troll with no credibility. Go scream at the sky with your demented mind and conspiracy garbage. Nobody wants to listen to you cuz everything you post is made up in your crazy head.
A true troll like Jason always gives himself away like Jason does here…The reference for the 10th tablet was given repeatedly…It is in Caesar Glebbeek’s ‘Until We Meet Again’ disinformation work that was published in 2011 and it does say exactly what I quoted…Saying it is a lie when the reference was clearly given earns Jason his rightful place in boobyville…Jason is projecting because it is he and his idiotic denial trolling that has no support…
Sorry wine hoaxer, you are lying. Ceasar Glebbeek confirmed that 9 pills are a lethal overdose and they didn’t say you needed 10 pills to overdose. You can’t post this information cuz it does not exist and you are making it up. No manufacturer is going to say 10 pills are safe to take all at once.
Buster the troll and his pathetic attempt to deny real information that was directly printed on the Vesparax pamphlet for his made up crap that doesn’t exist. That’s what a troll does and it’s why this joker is banned from every site and forum he posts on. Then he calls these same people liars with his alias Scrum Drum and pretends they are credible “witnesses”. Buster is a troll with a few screws loose who always ends up making himself look like a fool.
BUSTER says: There’s no point in seriously responding to nuts, nay-sayers, or trolls…
JASON says: Then why are you responding? Nobody was talking to you. You’re the troll and the nut, nay saying direct information that was directly printed on the Vesparax pamphlet. You’re nay saying real evidence that refutes your hoax. Nobody here takes you seriously. You proved that you’re just a troll and a fraud.
BUSTER says: Jason lost this debate when he was unable to answer why the Vesparax manufacturer listed a 10th tablet…
JASON says: I haven’t “lost” anything. The Vesparax manufacturers never listed a 10th tablet and you can’t post this information cuz it does not exist. You are lying which is why you can’t post this claim on this site.
Ceasar Glebbeek confirmed that 9 pills are a lethal dose. I just posted the information and warnings from the Vesparax pamphlet printed by the manufacturers and it said nothing about a 10th pill. It says an overdose is fatal and no doctor was prescribing 9 or 10 pills to their patients.
BUSTER says: Jason is obviously a nut who is not playing with a full deck because he responded that I was lying about the Vesparax product manufacturer’s data as shown in Glebbeek’s ‘Until We Meet Again’…
JASON says: Buster is a mentally ill nut that believes in things that doesn’t exist like the imaginary 10th pill that was never listed. Buster won’t post that “data” here cuz it does not exist.
The information on the Vesparax pamphlet printed by the manufacturers says nothing about a 10th pill. It says overdoses are fatal and no doctor was prescribing 10 pills.
BUSTER says: Jason is getting away with dismissing good witnessing and evidence by trolling that all the sources are lying…
JASON says: Who is a good witness with good evidence? Monika Dannemann? Monika is a liar and you’ve said so yourself.
Sharon Lawrence? Sharon is a liar too. She said Jimi committed suicide based on the number 9 who was obsessed with the occult. She lied and said Jimi was born at a family friend’s house. That is a lie. This is good evidence to you?
Tappy “the fraud” Wright? He made up the phony Michael Jeffery “murder” confession. Jeffery was in Spain. He is a credible witness?
Fraud Bannister? The 3 count convicted fraud doctor who claims he witnessed wine but has no documents or evidence of this claimed wine.
That’s all you have. You called these same people liars.
Buster: Monika is a liar.
Scrum Drum: Sharon is a liar.
Scrum Drum: Don’t trust Sharon. There’s something seriously wrong with her.
JASON says: Here you are calling these same people liars yourself. You are a hypocrite and a nut. You have no argument or credibility. You call these same people liars yourself.
BUSTER says: No credible Hendrix expert has ever alleged those sources were lying and those who are personally familiar with the Hendrix world and this subject know they aren’t…
Buster: Monika is a liar.
Scrum Drum: Sharon is a liar.
Scrum Drum: Don’t trust Sharon. There’s something seriously wrong with her.
Buster: We already caught Siefert lying.
Buster: Crompton is lying.
JASON says: Well, you are no credible Hendrix “expert” cuz you are calling all these people liars yourself. The thing with you is, you take their lies that fits best with your hoax cuz you are a troll with no credibility. You use their lies so you can push your phony narrative. You are a cherry picker and pick the lies you like and then you call them a liar when you don’t like what they are saying.
BUSTER says: Jason is just a nut who is accusing people of lying instead of admitting their evidence…
JASON says: Buster is a nut who has called these same people liars. Buster is now using Monika Dannemann’s lies so he can claim 9 Vesparax pills didn’t kill Jimi cuz he is a hoaxing troll who will use any means necessary to push his debunked scam.
Their claims are bogus and they are lying. You pick the lies you like for your hoax.
BUSTER says: If I were moderator of this room Jason and Ivana would be banned so the public would not be subjected to their idiotic denial trolling and the subject matter could be brought back to serious content…
JASON says: Buster wants anybody banned who exposes his phony Jimi Hendrix “Murder” Hoax as the phony baloney sham that it is.
Your “content” is a joke based on conspiracy crap that was proven to be nothing but made up fantasy. You are not the moderator, so quit whining to have us banned. You are banned from every site and forum you post on for making up blatant lies.
Buster is a hypocrite and a clown. He cries about forums and sites banning him “denying his free speech and denying his ‘good evidence'” but wants to ban us cuz we easily refute his garbage.
Simply put, Buster wants his “free speech” to push his hoax and wants to silence others who debunk his junk. Buster feels that “free speech” should only apply to him and that everybody has to agree with him. That’s cuz Buster is a certified nut.
BUSTER says: About a decade ago Janie Hendrix was asked about Jimi’s death and she responded “The way Jimi died that is told of in the official story is not the real way he died”…
JASON says: LOL. More of your bogus quotes. Hit the road troll. You have no real evidence to provide.
Hi Jason,The monument erected at Renton Cemetery in honour of Jimi was commissioned by Janie so that fans could pay their respects replacing the simple one of decades earlier. This would haven take time and energy does Buster then think that Janie wouldn’t have taken the same amount of time if she smelled a rat about her brother’s death. Like Kathy she didn’t believe Jimi was a victim of foul play like Buster keeps repeating over and over again hoping someone will believe him.
Nobody believes Buster except for his fake alias accounts LOL.
If Janie or Al, when he was alive, thought there was foul play they would have had a full investigation conducted.
Janie is on video tape dismissing these bogus hoax stories saying Jimi’s death was accidental.
Buster will now accuse Janie of being “gotten to” by Michael Jeffery’s ghost and being brought in on the “cover up”. Hahaha
Paul Allen the co-founder of Microsoft was also a huge fan of Jimi pouring money into the Hendrix Museum. Do you really think he would’ve helped out if he thought Jimi was murdered-he certainly had the money to get an investigation going like Kathy did. Let me guess Buster he was in on the cover-up. LOL.
The reality is there was only one witness the night Jimi died from a lethal overdose, and that was Monika Dannemann, who kept changing her stories so she couldn’t be held accountable for Jimi’s death. The rest of the so called authors are only speculating what happened and they have no idea, since they weren’t there and use second hand quotes from people who have all contradicted themselves.
Here is a perfect example of how Monika Dannemann changed her stories.
From “The Final Days of Jimi Hendrix By Tony Brown: “It took steady probing to get the basic facts. ‘I have been a skating champion in Germany,’ she said. ‘I had an accident, then an operation, with much pain. My prescription was in the flat. Vesparax pills.’ Did you give them to him?’ I asked. ‘No, he must have found them in the cupboard.’ How many did he take?’ I don’t know,’ she said and started to cry. ‘How many?’ `They came in a packet of ten. I had not needed to open them.’ I asked how many were left. She replied, ‘One. Just one.’ “She stopped crying to add, in a practical tone, ‘They’re very strong. My doctor told me never to take more than half of one.’
Here Monika claims Jimi took the pills on his own and denies giving Jimi the pills herself. Monika admits the pills were very strong and her doctor told her never to take more than a half pill.
So, these same doctors who told her never to take more than a half, since these pills are very strong, are not going to tell her 20 years later that 9 Vesparax pills were safe for to Jimi to take and he couldn’t die from them. The warning on the Vesparax pamphlet said an overdose can cause death or coma. That’s why the doctors told Monika never to take more than half.
Now we get a different story from Monika when she spoke to Kathy, Mitch, and Noel.
From “Through Gypsy Eyes” By Kathy Etchingham: “She told us how Jimi had been having trouble sleeping in her basement room at the private Samarkand Hotel in Notting Hill Gate and how she gave him some of her German sleeping pills (Vesparax). When they didn’t work she gave him some more because ‘they were very weak’. She said she thought he had taken about nine of the tablets in all. She claimed that she called an ambulance when she couldn’t wake him in the morning. When she was in the ambulance on the way to the hospital she had seen the paramedic sitting Jimi upright, letting his head loll forward, when he should have laid him down. When they reached the hospital, she said, the doctors ignored Jimi because he was black and he died sitting in a sort of dentist’s chair. The doctor who was in charge of the case, she announced, was incompetent and racist. Noel, Mitch and I sat in stunned silence for a while. It was a shocking story. If it was true, and we had no reason to doubt this woman’s word, then there had been at worst a blatant cover-up by the authorities and at best an appallingly mismanaged inquest.”
Now we get a whole new story from Monika. She stated that she was the one to give Jimi the pills cuz he couldn’t sleep. Here Monika claims the pills “were very weak”. Monika said she gave “Jimi some pills” and they didn’t work. And then she gave him “some more”. She thought it was 9 but wasn’t sure. So, it could have been more. It appears the racist incompetent doctor Monika was speaking of was Fraud Bannister.
Monika is lying here, cuz she knew the pills were strong since her doctor told her and she knew the correct dose to take. But here she says they were weak and she gave him all the pills herself. Remember in Tony Brown’s book, she said Jimi took them on his own without her knowledge and there was one pill left in the package of ten. Here she tells Kathy that she gave Jimi “some pills” and gave him “some more” and wasn’t sure if it was nine. It could have been more.
So, Dannemann is not to be trusted with any claim she makes, especially with her doctors 20 years later claiming 9 Vesparax pills couldn’t kill Jimi. Only a true moron would use her lies and try to claim it’s “forensic science”.
We have conflicting stories here from Monika. To understand what really happened, you have to look at both of her stories. She knew the pills were strong, but gave some to Jimi, and then gave him some more until he had a lethal overdose. Then she started to panic and had no idea what to do. That’s why she reacted the way she did and lied the rest of her life to keep herself from being accused of killing Jimi by total ineptness. That’s the story folks.
Hi Jason, Terrific research. The fact that Jimi was not living with Monika at the Samarkand but was registered at the Cumberland Hotel meant that he wouldn’t have known where Monika kept her pills so she would have been the one who actually gave Jimi the pills. She very well knew the safe dose for Vesparax since this was a prescription drug which could only have been obtained by a doctor. The dosage would have been clearly marked on the label on the outside of the packet/bottle. Everything Monika said subsequent to Jimi’s death was designed to distance herself from any blame.
The dosage instructions on the package were in German so Jimi couldn’t read them…All part of a premeditated Intelligence plan to kill Jimi…What Monika told Kathy and Noel in 1982 was the real truth…That Jimi was set up with pills whose instructions he couldn’t read and was told the pills were weak so he had to take more…
Well said Ivana! Jimi wouldn’t have known where she kept them unless she gave them. Monika knew these pills were powerful cuz if she didn’t she would have overdosed on them herself. Everybody who takes medication is aware of the dosage and knows the strength.
And of course the moronic troll Buster comes with his bogus “intelligence crap”. According to Buster and his fraud pal Tappy Wright, Michael Jeffery stuffed the pills in Jimi’s mouth so the German writing wouldn’t even matter. See how this lying fraud changes his bogus stories each time? This clown debunks himself yet again. LOL.
The “cuz” troll Jason once again enters one of his egregious misquoting lies above in order to put words in people’s mouths for strawman purposes…Jason will not be able to provide any quote of anyone ever saying the doctors told Monika 9 pills were safe to take, as Jason scummily quotes above…Jason is entering false quotes because he needs to distort the opposition’s argument in order to avoid giving a serious answer to what was actually said…Again – if he did this in a credibly-moderated room he would quickly be out on his ass with a banning and the room would be restored to non-trolling status…Of course the doctors did not tell Monika 9 tablets was OK to take…Jason is intentionally misconstruing the issue…What they did tell Monika was that 9 of her Vesparax would not have killed Jimi…And they were correct…One of the autopsy doctors also said this as well when he said “The amount of barbiturate in Jimi was dangerous but not lethal”…We already know this is true because the doctors wrote barbiturate “intoxication” instead of “poisoning” on Jimi’s cause of death documentation…That terminology is very important because it distinguishes between overdose and dangerous dose and tells you the autopsy doctors were aware the pills were not fatal…
Jason is a murder-denying scumbag so he is trying to lure the public in to taking his deliberately limited version seriously…There’s only one problem with his dishonestly slanted version above…It forgets to mention the 5 bottles of wine the attending emergency room doctor removed from Jimi’s lungs and stomach and its forensic consequences…If Scotland Yard were honestly investigating there’s no way they would let Monika saying the pills were strong and the pills were weak in two different accounts go without any follow-through…A more honest and keener analyzer would realize Monika told too much truth in her meeting with Kathy and Noel in 1982…A smart detective would realize that if Monika told Kathy the pills were weak and Jimi needed to take more that she probably told Jimi the same thing and that it was done on purpose…This rotten piece of shit Jason is trying to seize the narrative and dishonestly confine things to his information-short version…Therefore he plays dumb and doesn’t ask the necessary questions any serious investigator would…
A good example of Jason’s fraudulent inaccuracy is the fact Monika did not find any 10th pill still in the Vesparax foil pack…The 10th pill was said to have been found under the bed when the cops inspected the room…Jason doesn’t tell the readers that Vesparax came in pop-out foil 10 packs in the carton so a whole foil pack of ten was taken with one falling under the bed…This, and the fact the .7mg barbiturate level equals 9 tablets, makes it highly assumable that Jimi did indeed take 9 Vesparax…
No Jason…Only a moron would think his obvious murder denial stupidity was fooling anyone or that he was getting away with ignoring the better evidence in public…Jason is trying to get away with the murder of ignoring how Dr Siefert’s admission that “Jimi was covered in wine” corroborates Dr Bannister’s witnessing of wine flooding Jimi up to his throat…Or how Dr Crompton’s statement to Kathy Etchingham that “Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid” even further corroborates it…It is Jason who lies, not Sharon Lawrence, when he denies her witnessing of Monika admitting she poured wine on Jimi…Just like Monika’s conflicting statements about her pills this admission to Sharon Lawrence was Monika’s way of getting around wine she knew was used to murder Jimi…
Jason lost this debate when he decided to use demented kiddie trolling to deny the clearly referenced manufacturer’s product information that said Lethal Dose was “9 or 10 tablets”…Jason can’t answer why the manufacturer mentioned a 10th tablet?…The obvious reason is because they knew 9 tablets was not enough to cause an overdose because it didn’t have enough barbiturate to reach scientific Lethal Dose…Jason then categorically fails to answer the rest of the forensic argument where Jimi could not have possibly overdosed in only 1 or 2 hours from such a short dose or vomited so profusely…That simple barbiturate overdose dog don’t hunt because it obviously ignores too much other evidence…
The bottom line is Jason’s disinformation trolling and ignoring of evidence kills Jimi in a way that was impossible for a person with a known tolerance with only 9 tablets in only 1 or 2 hours…Jason uses the false assertion that Monika panicked and watched Jimi die a horrific death without doing anything…I think we know which story you would have to be a moron to believe…Jason is too full of denial fervor to realize his faulty version is only proving our case for us and that Jimi did not die from the Vesparax…He died from being forcefully drowned in a large amount of wine after he passed-out from the Vesparax…Only a real rotten son of a bitch would try to deny the obvious in Dr Bannister’s story…
Deranged hoaxer Buster the clown still writes his same debunked imaginary wine nonsense that is nothing but total b.s.
We just read two passages from two books with Monika Dannemann telling her contradicting stories. Nothing about wine was ever mentioned. This moron wine hoaxer Buster expects us to believe that after Monika gave Jimi the pills “unknown murderers” burst into the room and started pouring wine into Jimi. This is total made up b.s. that never happened. Only a true moron would believe anything like that. It’s stupid and it’s ridiculous.
This hoaxer Buster was just called out for his lie and he still repeats it again. NO autopsy doctor ever said the amount of barbiturates wasn’t fatal. There was only 1 autopsy doctor, that was Dr. Teare. This lying clown posts it again. That’s what a troll this clown is.
The 9 Vesparax pills were proven to be lethal which returned lethal results of barbiturate poisoning inside Jimi Hendrix. 0.7mg is above lethal and a 3.9 liver reading means the liver was poisoned by toxicity from the Vesparax. Dr. Teare confirmed to the media that Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning after the inquest in 1970. Not one word about imaginary wine was ever stated and this wine troll Buster can never produce any documentation of his fake wine. He can only “talk” about it cuz he is a troll.
The rest of this garbage post is the same debunked crap he repeats over and over along with his phony narration and fake b.s. interpretation. He also still whines for me to be banned haha.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose and never said one word about any imaginary wine. No wine was ever detected during the autopsy. There was no fake wine. And this fool still posts it anyway.
Monika gave Jimi too many pills and that was it. She was under the influence of pills herself and started to panic when she realized what happened and how she screwed up which is why she lied for the rest of her life. Fraud Bannister’s story is crap. He said it was a drug overdose in 1970 when he confirmed it was a drug overdose for the media. Then in 1992 all this phony wine comes about. What a joke. No documents exist of this phony wine and hospitals don’t work on a 7 1/2 hour dead corpse. This wine hoax is a joke. Monika gave Jimi the pills and she lied before and said Jimi took them himself without her knowledge. Buster the wine hoaxer has to spew his debunked wine bullshit like a clown lol.
All this hoaxer Buster can do is deny the real events and drug overdose with his made up stories that do not exist. This clown wasn’t there and he pretends that he was knowing everything that happened.
Hi Jason, Buster seems like those people who invent outrageous and shocking stories just to get attention. He is a serial troll whose far fetched stories got him banned from other forums. No-one believes his stories and you would think he’d take the hint and give it up after a while. What Buster has failed to understand is that the toxic barbiturate level caused Jimi’s death nothing more. How stupid would you need to be to not get that.
Hi Ivana,
Buster is making a fool of himself and nobody takes him seriously anywhere he ever posted. Then he gets banned on Hendrix sites and political sites for trolling. It does seem like he wants attention and his fake stories get more ridiculous each time he posts them. He just repeated his bogus “one of the autopsy doctors said that the pills weren’t lethal” after he was proven to be a liar. That’s what troll and hoaxer does, they keep repeating the same fake stories when they know it’s false. He has to be a complete idiot to believe what he writes. He wants Jimi to be “murdered” and he uses any fake story to make that happen. Buster wants us to believe Jimi took the pills and then “murders” burst in the room to pour wine down his throat. Just total nonsense that is stupid. He seems to have abandoned Wright’s phony tale that he was parroting of “murderers” shoving pills in Jimi’s mouth. This serial troll Buster will never tell us who these imaginary “murderers” are. Funny how both John Saua and Reginal Jones never saw this imaginary wine this joker claims. Both of them confirmed it was a drug overdose too just like St. Mary Abbots Hospital. This joker has no answer for that either.
Dr. Teare stated at the beginning of his autopsy report that there were no signs of violence. If Jimi had all that wine forced down his throat then the esophagus would have shown signs of bruising and trauma. Jimi’s face and nasal passages would also have been covered in wine. Strange how all of this escaped the experienced Dr. Teare. All of Jimi’s other organs would also have been soaked in wine with all that flooding you insist on Buster but strange how the autopsy report mentioned very little wine. How could anyone have missed all that flooding? The amount of wine detected in Jimi’s urine and blood was consistent with what he drank, and not water boarded with it.
Just to show what an idiot Ivana is, she has been repeatedly informed that Jimi had a .7mg barbiturate blood level at his autopsy…That is a dangerous level that would cause unconsciousness…So there would be no bruising when the wine was forced in to Jimi…Ivana idiotically suggest that if Jimi was drowned in wine that he would show signs of it…The whole time ignoring that Dr Siefert said Jimi was covered in wine and Dr Bannister said Monika’s scarf around Jimi’s neck was soaked in wine as well as his hair (duh)…Ivana is a rank moron because she has been repeatedly told that the wine was removed from Jimi at St Mary Abbots Hospital on Friday and Dr Teare did not see Jimi until Monday…So therefore it was impossible that the wine would be seen at the autopsy like Ivana moronically suggests…In any credibly overseen debate Ivana would be removed for sheer stupidity and being unable to follow a simple argument of evidence…
The alcohol in Jimi’s urine was commensurate with the wine he drank earlier in the evening at Harvey’s 6 hours earlier…However Ivana doesn’t honestly mention the measured blood alcohol content of 5mg Jimi possessed which drastically conflicted with the unusual amount of wine Dr Bannister removed from him…That wine was confirmed by Dr Crompton when he told Kathy Etchingham Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid…
Just to show you what an idiot Buster is 0.7mg is an above lethal level that causes death. Tappy Wright’s bogus story had Michael Jeffery stuffing pills in Jimi’s mouth and forcing wine bottles into his windpipe. You don’t get to make up your own fake stories that do not exist.
Bannister is a fraud and there was no wine. No ambulance man or police saw wine. Dr. Brown saw no wine. No documents of wine exist. St Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed it was a drug overdose. No wine was detected at the autopsy. Fraud Bannister has no evidence and only a phony story.
There was no “fluid” in Jimi’s lungs. Kathy said there was no phony wine. The autopsy says 400ml of fluid in his chest and lungs were congested. No wine was detected in any fluid. So, again you make up bullshit and have no evidence to proce cuz you are a hoaxer.
If there’s an idiot on this thread it’s you Buster. Dr Bannister is just waiting for fools like you to fall for his story. Dr. Bannister had ignored completely the autopsy report of Dr. Teare as a drug related death caused by the Vesparax to an alcohol related death. You know full well that no work is permitted to be done on a corpse before an autopsy is conducted but you have fallen for Bannister’s story because without it you have no story. In your story the wine features heavily like the fictional five bottles of wine that were supposedly removed in casualty by Bannister along with Jimi being covered in it. You have repeatedly pushed the waterboarding story for years even though it has been revealed to be untrue. You are the one who has been saying that the fluid in Jimi’s lungs was wine when no-one else did.What was actually said was that the fluid was caused by the overdose of pills and that the pills also caused liver damage to a point where Jimi had no chance of survival. You are a wine hoaxing serial troll; it’s about time you stopped with your bogus story of murder and let Jason and myself take over with the real story. In other words GET LOST.
Kathy’s investigation came about because of the inconsistencies in Monika’s story. She kept changing the time she woke up and noticed when Jimi was in trouble. There was a delay in calling the ambulance so it was assumed that this delay contributed to Jimi’s death. Instead of ringing for the ambulance when Monika realised Jimi was in trouble she called around asking for help. If Jimi had known the strength of the pills he was taking he might not have taken them. This would have been Monika’s responsibility to disclose since she was familiar with the safe dosage of this particular drug. There’s just no excuse for not revealing the potency of this drug, and keeping this vital information to yourself. In this case it caused Jimi’s death.
This quote from Kathy tells you all you need to know. Kathy did an investigation into Jimi’s death and learned all the facts through hospital medical documents, autopsy reports, and business contracts. Kathy dismisses all these phony wine hoax stories and bogus “murder claims”. She saw the autopsy and hospital reports. No phony wine was ever documented. It never existed. It’s all a hoax. Everything shows Jimi Hendrix died from a lethal overdose along with an above the legal limit alcohol level that resulted in barbiturate poisoning and Kathy Etchingham confirms it.
“The reality is, Jimi had taken 18 times the normal dose of barbiturate, along with the alcohol equivalent of eight beers. So the next time someone tells you he didn’t die of a drug overdose…of course he did! The pathologist said that even if he hadn’t vomited, he would have died anyway. He would have stopped breathing eventually, unless an ambulance had been called much earlier on. The thing is, Jimi didn’t know what he was taking. He couldn’t read a label in German. He would have trusted…whoever” – Kathy Etchingham
Makes perfect sense, Jason. That amount of sleeping pills would have slowed Jimi’s heart until it stopped completely. Jimi would have been drinking at Harvey’s and Kameron’s parties so he would have had alcohol in his system when he took the Vesparax shortly afterwards.
Jason, you mentioned in an earlier post that Ginger Baker thought Monika was unstable. I wonder how he came to that conclusion was it because he had met her before or was it something that was being said at the time. In Chris Welsh biography ‘Hendrix’ Gerry Stickells said “Before he died I’d never met Monika Dannemann she’d been around because Eric had met her before but in my opinion she blows it up a lot bigger than it was.” Monika also had a falling out with the Hendrix family in Seattle on one of her visits and was asked to leave. I wonder what that was about?
Hi Ivana,
Ginger was in London the morning Jimi died and wanted to hang out with him that night. Ginger said “He must be with that crazy chick” when he couldn’t find Jimi. He didn’t specifically say that he actually met her, but said she was mentally unstable, so he knew the type of person she was. So, it seems likely that he did or heard it from someone who met her during that week. Ginger also directly stated that Dannemann was responsible for Jimi’s death.
Yeah, she left a bad impression on a lot of people and she was trying to push her paintings off on to people that she made of Jimi.
Kathy knows a lot more than what she said on the Montalvo show…I know because I’ve spoken to her…8 beers equals about 200mg of blood alcohol so Jason is only showing his reckless ignorance by posting that and not accounting for it forensically…The 5mg blood alcohol content recorded at Jimi’s autopsy is a trace amount so therefore Jason saying it was above the legal driving limit is not accurate…Kathy is just trying to get rid of the subject in order to not get involved because she realized she uncovered a monster that went way past Monika…What counts the most is Dr Crompton told her Jimi’s lungs were full of fluid so therefore he couldn’t be breathing when he arrived at hospital…We know Jimi was murdered because we can see a clear pattern of the British government not looking deeper in to what really happened and avoiding interviewing the witnesses…
More made up conspiracy garbage.
Haha. This serial troll “Buster” is a clown who pretends he talks to Kathy and she tells him “secret private information”. Get some mental help troll.
Dr. Teare confirmed that Jimi had an above legal alcohol limit that was enough to fail a breathalyzer test. Yet this troll wants to deny it.
Now this serial troll speaks for Kathy in fake narration like he knows more than she does. What a joke. That is how a how a hoaxer operates.
Kathy did an investigation into Jimi’s death and read all the official medical reports. And this serial troll did not. All he can do is deny the real forensic science and never produce any documentation of any kind. That’s cuz he is a banned troll who makes up lies for his hoax.
Jimi did not have “lungs full of fluid”. The autopsy report only states Jimi had congested lungs. The 400ml of fluid was in his chest. The forensic analysis of the fluid detected no wine so that ends your bogus hoax.
London Times
September 19, 1970
Jimi Hendrix Dead From Drug Overdose
Jimi Hendrix, the American pop singer and guitarist, died in London yesterday. He had been taken by ambulance from a flat in a private hotel in Notting Hill but was dead on arrival at St Mary Abbot’s Hospital, Kensington.
The cause of death was an overdose of drugs, said a St. Mary Abbots Hospital spokesman, but a post mortem examination would be carried out today. The police said it was in a flat where Mr Hendrix had died.
JASON says: Reported accurately by the press in 1970, Jimi Hendrix was declared dead on arrival. A person who is a D.O.A. does not have any “procedures” done to them. Which is the reason there are no hospital documents for any “procedures” on Jimi Hendrix. What can be done for a dead 7 1/2 hour drug overdose victim? Nothing.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose on 9/18/70. The hospital made sure to get the cause of death correct since Jimi was a world famous musician and they didn’t want to ruin their credibility. Fraud Bannister was the doctor who signed off on the drug overdose confirmation since he was the doctor to declare Jimi dead.
All you are seeing there is government propaganda…You can’t determine a cause of death before the autopsy so Jason is only showing his incompetent stupidity…Monika fed them the story that Jimi died from her pills knowing that Jimi was murdered by being drowned in wine…When Sharon Lawrence was the first person to confront Monika about the wine Monika reacted to the question by moaning in to the telephone for 20 seconds…Monika also ended up dead because of the issue when researchers finally starting circling her with questions…Monika told Sharon that she washed sick off Jimi’s face with wine…Monika was lying because there was no vomit washed off Jimi’s face when the ambulance men arrived…Monika was obviously making an excuse for wine she knew was used to murder Jimi…Saying Sharon is lying is for boobies…
More conspiracy nonsense not to be believed or taken seriously.
LOL.
All we have here is more pathetic excuses from a serial troll trying to invent phony claims of wine that doesn’t exist.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed on 9/18/70 that Jimi died from a drug overdose and that was the only cause of death and the media all over the world reported what they were told by the attending doctors.
No fake wine was ever seen or witnessed at the death scene. No fake wine was ever documented on any hospital or autopsy report. The fake wine story didn’t appear until 1992 when Fraud Bannister made it up. This was 1970 when the conspiracy theorists didn’t make fake claims.
Sharon Lawrence said Jimi Hendrix committed suicide with 9 pills, so this wine nonsense is irrelevant and contradicts Sharon Lawrence’s suicide claim. Sharon Lawrence felt 9 Vesparax pills would kill Jimi since she said he committed suicide.
The debunked propaganda is coming from this pathetic serial troll Buster who looks very stupid denying documented facts with bogus claims that can’t be confirmed as facts and is not real evidence. Lawrence is making a claim and she has no evidence to prove as usual when she already confirmed it was a suicide by 9 pills. That ends the phony wine claim.
BUSTER says: Saying Sharon is lying is for boobies…
Scrum Drum: Sharon is a liar.
Scrum Drum: Don’t trust Sharon. There’s something seriously wrong with her.
JASON says: “Buster” is the biggest boob of all who already called Sharon a liar with his alias Scrum Drum he posts with on other sites he is banned from.
Serial troll “Buster” is a trolling hypocrite who has no credibility and continues to embarrass himself.
Blood tests determine an overdose, moron. That’s how hospitals operate. The vomit sample returned results of high levels of Vesparax. No fake wine was detected. The autopsy results determined the same results as St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed.
The snake oil barker Jason is trying to tell us Monika, who was up to her neck in a conspiracy and received death threats, was going to come forth about the wine…Tappy was close to Jeffery so his hearing the story directly that he told in his book of two thugs entering the Samarkand flat and murdering Jimi fits the evidence…The only thing Jason offers is hand-waving protest and scoffing but he doesn’t really offer much more…The evidence fits this scenario and we have a credible member of Jeffery’s management revealing it…Of course Jason will deal with Tappy like he does every dangerous witness and say he is lying but I knew Tappy and there is much more to it than that…
There was an autopsy doctor who said “While the dose Jimi took was dangerous it was not fatal”…I’m just not going to bother to dig through my boxes to find it for a nut who is only going to ignore it and try to change the subject in to his trolling when I produce it…I’ve already proven 9 Vesparax wasn’t fatal by showing the 1800mg of barbiturate 9 Vesparax contains…We have Jason running in public from checking that out in barbiturate science sources because he knows it will check out and he can’t answer it…Jason never answered why the Vesparax manufacturer listed a 10th pill for Lethal Dose…
There’s no point in chasing Jason down his denial rabbit holes…The wine was corroborated repeatedly by Siefert, Crompton, Brown, Thurston, Monika, and the fact Scotland Yard avoided the nurses…This preponderance of witnessing of the wine corroborates Bannister and proves Jimi was murdered by being drowned in wine and it was covered-up at the official level…The only reason they tried to save a 7.5 hour dead corpse is because of the wine they needed to remove in order to attempt resuscitation…But also because of the lack of any people at the Samarkand where the participants had evacuated in order to avoid any questions from the police over the cause…Jason is too dumb to realize that by admitting Jimi was dead for 7 and 1/2 hours he is indirectly admitting Jimi did not have the barbiturate in him long enough to possibly die from it…
Buster the hoaxer back with more made up rubbish. The bit about trying to save a 7.5 hour dead corpse to remove the wine is just the rant of a lunatic bringing back someone who had been dead for that long would never be attempted and it would be impossible. This is just crazy stuff get help Buster.
More conspiracy crap from a serial troll with no evidence. All this joker can do is deny real forensic science and documented evidence and post his asinine fake narration stories instead . Buster believes a 7 1/2 dead decomposing corpse can be resuscitated and brought back from the dead. Buster’s dead hoax becomes more hilarious each time this hoaxer types.
BUSTER says: The snake oil barker Jason is trying to tell us Monika, who was up to her neck in a conspiracy and received death threats, was going to come forth about the wine…Tappy was close to Jeffery so his hearing the story directly that he told in his book of two thugs entering the Samarkand flat and murdering Jimi fits the evidence…The only thing Jason offers is hand-waving protest and scoffing but he doesn’t really offer much more…The evidence fits this scenario and we have a credible member of Jeffery’s management revealing it…Of course Jason will deal with Tappy like he does every dangerous witness and say he is lying but I knew Tappy and there is much more to it than that…
JASON says: No wine was ever witnessed at the flat by the ambulance men or the police. They only witnessed dry vomit consistent with a drug overdose.
The phony story from Wright was Michael Jeffery and his friends stuffed pills into Jimi’s mouth and forced wine down his throat. There would have been evidence of physical violence in this fake scenario. This is a bogus debunked tale that you try to change for your dead hoax.
More fake narration from a troll who can never produce any documentation of this imaginary wine.
BUSTER says: There was an autopsy doctor who said “While the dose Jimi took was dangerous it was not fatal”…I’m just not going to bother to dig through my boxes to find it for a nut who is only going to ignore it and try to change the subject in to his trolling when I produce it…I’ve already proven 9 Vesparax wasn’t fatal by showing the 1800mg of barbiturate 9 Vesparax contains…We have Jason running in public from checking that out in barbiturate science sources because he knows it will check out and he can’t answer it…Jason never answered why the Vesparax manufacturer listed a 10th pill for Lethal Dose…
JASON says: Serial troll Buster can only repeat these 2 same debunked lies cuz that’s all he has….pathetic! Get some new material.
Dr. Teare was the only autopsy doctor. Dr. Teare stated Jimi died from barbiturate poisoning, so he never said it wasn’t fatal. Another bogus lie from this deranged serial troll.
You haven’t “proven” anything. No Vesparax manufacturers ever said that “9 pills were not fatal and you need a 10th to die”. Nobody ever stated this and this troll can’t produce this statement cuz it does not exist. No Vesparax manufacturer is going to tell you that 9 pills are safe to take when it’s a lethal overdose. Doctors never even prescribed that many pills for patients and no studies were ever done for people taking that many pills Vesparax cuz it is lethal.
BUSTER says: There’s no point in chasing Jason down his denial rabbit holes…The wine was corroborated repeatedly by Siefert, Crompton, Brown, Thurston, Monika, and the fact Scotland Yard avoided the nurses…This preponderance of witnessing of the wine corroborates Bannister and proves Jimi was murdered by being drowned in wine and it was covered-up at the official level…The only reason they tried to save a 7.5 hour dead corpse is because of the wine they needed to remove in order to attempt resuscitation…But also because of the lack of any people at the Samarkand where the participants had evacuated in order to avoid any questions from the police over the cause…Jason is too dumb to realize that by admitting Jimi was dead for 7 and 1/2 hours he is indirectly admitting Jimi did not have the barbiturate in him long enough to possibly die from it…
JASON says: More bullshit here. Dr. Brown and Dr. Thurston never confirmed any fake wine. No fake wine was “removed”. No wine was ever documented on any hospital report. A dead 7 1/2 hour decomposing drug overdose victim doesn’t have resuscitation attempts done on them. Most overdoses occur within 1-2 hours so another bogus denial claim from this troll.
Dr. Bob Brown clearly states that nothing was done for Jimi Hendrix which debunks these phony “procedures” that never happened and Dr. Brown mentions nothing about any fake wine. Another nail in the wine hoaxing coffin.
“I did locum jobs at five or six different little hospitals while I was there. One of them was St. Mary Abbots Hospital, and I was working there when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead. Straight away, I knew who he was, but there was nothing I could do for him. There were a lot of people weeping and much commotion. Poor Jimi.” – Doctor Bob Brown
Hi Jason, Buster’s claims are becoming more and more far-fetched. The ambulance officers both said this was an overdose and they could tell just by looking at Jimi that he had been dead for a while. They then wheel him into casualty where he his pronounced dead. Dr Teare performs the autopsy and makes the same assessment as the ambulance officers-death from a drugs overdose. Monika makes absolutely no mention of wine but says that Jimi took 9 of her Vesparax again confirming that this was drug related death. Dr. Thurston reiterates Dr. Teare’s autopsy results and then years later Dr. Crompton, a successor of Dr. Teare, confirms all of the above that Jimi died as a result of taking a lethal dose of barbiturates.
Hi Ivana,
Buster the hoaxer always posted ridiculous nonsense for his bogus stories. Now he just posts pathetic denials each time real evidence refutes him. Nobody spoke of any imaginary wine except for Fraud Bannister, the lying Tappy Wright, and a couple other conspiracy hoaxers.
No wine was ever witnessed at the flat and no documents exist of it. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose and Dr. Teare confirmed the findings in the autopsy and Dr. Thurston made it official. Jimi’s friends and the people who were close to him know he died from an overdose and only the phonies made up conspiracy nonsense so they could make money off books.
Ginger Baker on Jimi Hendrix:
“Eric liked Jimi, and I got to know him as a person and we became very good friends,” Ginger says. “We were going to get some music together in 1970 after Blind Faith ended, but he ended up picking the wrong chick, Monika [Dannemann]. She was responsible for his death. He’s in bed with a chick and he’s sick and she runs out, leaving him in his sick? Disgraceful. When they picked him up he was cold.”
Ginger wails. “He’d been dead for four hours. And that night we’d searched everywhere for him. We were going to invite him round, cos we had a big bottle of cocaine. If he’d done some coke,” Ginger laughs darkly, “he’d be alive, he’d never have gone to sleep.”
“I had good times with Jimi. He used to come to my house in Harrow for dinner. His thing was pulling chicks when he was on stage. We shared a few.”
So many rockers have played the ‘I could have saved Jimi Hendrix’ card. Why was Ginger’s hand any different?
“I told you!” he shouts. “We was gonna play moosic together! I don’t know what we’d have done. It was early days. Stupid question. Bloody hell. I was very keen on it and it would have happened. Unfortunately it didn’t.”
Hi Jason, Eric Clapton and Jimi had a great friendship and respect for each other. Eric cried for days after Jimi died. I think all of Jimi’s friends had his back but like Ginger said he ended up with Monika
that night, and he was found covered in vomit dead the next morning. Everyone knows the correct version of events and what happened to Jimi and it’s just like Ginger said.
Hi Ivana,
All of Jimi’s friends knew the real events of what happened to Jimi. Not one of them ever mentioned anything about imaginary wine or a phony murder. It was only these hoaxers who came up with bogus stories for books to make money off Jimi’s name hoping the “hook” in the book would entice people to buy it. Fraud Bannister was quickly discredited with his bogus wine claims and then the other fraudsters used the wine angle making up their own fake stories like Lying Sharon Lawrence and Tappy “The Fraud” Wright. Those phony claims were easily debunked as well. Then we have a serial hoaxer named “Buster”, who uses pieces of all their lies and ties it all together with his phony “intelligence murder by wine” nonsense. All of that is made up nonsense. All of Jimi’s friends knew died of a drug overdose at the hands of Monika Dannemann, which is why she lied her entire life trying to make herself not be responsible for what she did. Not one real friend of Jimi or any rock star during that time made bogus claims like we heard from these fraudsters in recent years.
Hi Jason, During Kathy’s investigation, Monika hired a private detective to prove that what she said about the events that morning were true and correct. I think she needed someone to confirm her story because she suspected that everything she said back then was being scrutinised and to protect herself from being held responsible or from possible charges.
Many people blamed Monika for Jimi’s death and she tried to get rid of the blame any way she could.
The toxic dose of barbiturates varies. However, an oral dose of one gram for most barbiturates can cause significant poisoning in an adult. Fatal cases of ingestion have occurred with doses starting at 2.0 grams.
Source: NCBI
JASON says: Jimi Hendrix’s autopsy registered 1.8 grams of barbiturates in his system. That is way above the level of significant poisoning and very close to the 2.0 fatal level.
Dr. Teare stated to the press after the inquest that Jimi’s death resulted in barbiturate poisoning. The 1.8 grams determined that Jimi had more than significant poisoning and was almost at the fatal 2.0 gram level. So, what Dr. Teare stated was accurate since Jimi’s liver and blood level was above lethal.
This also debunks the bogus claim that “9 pills isn’t enough for an overdose and you need 10 pills to have a lethal overdose”. 9 pills caused more than significant toxic barbiturate poisoning, almost at the fatal level in Jimi Hendrix.
Jimi died of an excessive overdose of barbiturates since the safe dosage for Vesparax was half a tablet. Jimi took 9. An extra pill would not have made any difference in the outcome. Dr. Teare was absolutely correct in his assessment otherwise he would not have published and reported what he did.
Each Vesparax tablet contains 239mg when you add up its 3 components Jimi swallowed 9 this amounts to a massive 2151mg. This would have absolutely killed anyone.
You mean he didn’t need a 10th pill like our hoaxer tells us? lol
All studies and evidence showed that 9 pills are a lethal dose and produced toxic levels inside Jimi Hendrix and any other person who would take that amount.
The best classification of barbiturates which relates to their degree of toxicity is being their speed of action:
Long -acting barbiturates – Brallobarbital
Short – acting barbiturates – Secobarbital
Much lower blood levels will be found in the short – acting group as death may occur more quickly from the usual mode of action, a central depression of the respiratory centres. Case studies show a death occuring within 20 minutes of taking an overdose of Secobarbital/brallobarbital/hydroxyzine known as the brand name sold as Vesparax.
Fatal barbiturate toxicity may be accidental or suicidal. The accidental fatalities are usually examples of medical error, mostly from misreading the labels on the box or the leaflet. A former doctor gave ten times the dose of Vesparax to a patient wrongly assuming that the stated number of milligrams on the box were to be taken all at once instead of to be taken in two seperate doses.
In acute cases of barbiturate intoxication, vomiting is very common with the victim at risk of choking to death due to being unconscious. Death will most likely occur due to a lack of breathing from the effects of the barbiturates.
The autopsy confirms any trauma or natural disease, and provides suitable material for analysis. The analyst interprets the toxicology results to the pathologist, by providing and indication of the therapeutic, toxic and fatal ranges of concentrations in various bodily fluids and tissues, and by pointing out problems such as decline from post ingestion survival, conversion to metabolites and many others.
At autopsy, the signs are of general cardiorespitory failure, with often a cyanotic, congestive appearance. Though more specific, the congested lungs in acute barbiturate poisonings are more intense than in any other condition. These organs will appear almost black and any vomit located in the upper respiratory area will be of the same colour.
The gastric mucosa may be badly damaged from the alkaline attack of the drugs such as sodium amytal which, being the sodium salt of a weak organic acid, hydrolyses in the stomach. The cardia and lower esophagus may be eroded from reflux, and the victim will appear to have black mucous membranes.
Sources: Patel, R. Fatal intoxication of barbiturates
Sources: Case, CG. Barbiturate toxicity
Sources: Green, M. Postmortem and clinical toxicology
This documented medical science is consistent with Jimi’s drug overdose death.
Vesparax contains both Brallobarbital and Secobarbital and Jimi took an overdose of both.
Studies found that a Vesparax death occurred in 20 minutes after ingesting the pills. This easily debunks “Buster’s” bogus claim of the pills not being in Jimi “long enough” “only” being in Jimi for 1-2 hours. An overdose can occur at any time after ingesting an overdose.
A patient died from taking an overdose of Vesparax at “10 times the normal dose”. Jimi Hendrix took 18 times the normal dose. So, this crap that “Buster” peddles about Jimi “needing a 10th pill” and “9 pills aren’t enough to overdose” is complete garbage made up buy him. A person died from taking 10 times the amount which is under both 9 and 10 pills. This shows you how strong Vesparax was.
Jimi Hendrix profusely vomited after his Vesparax overdose and suffocated on his own vomit after having difficulty breathing. Jimi had acute barbiturate intoxication and his death resulted exactly how acute barbiturate intoxication was defined.
The information how an autopsy is conducted was posted to debunk “Buster’s” lies. Everything during an autopsy is analyzed and tested including all bodily fluids. No phony was was ever found in the fluid in Jimi’s chest. The lungs and the tissues detected no wine inside Jimi. That proves there was no phony “wine drowning”. All the wine would have been soaked in the tissues and the lungs and the forensic analysis would have detected it, No wine was ever found proving no phony “wine drowning”
Jimi’s lungs and respiratory appeared to look the same as this scientific description proving it was an overdose. On Jimi’s autopsy it clearly states Jimi’s “lungs are congested” and dilated heart from the overdose. Reginal Jones described black vomit on Jimi’s pillow and around him. This scientific description that vomit will be black in color.
The black membranes and the black color was described by Fraud Bannister when Jimi was brought in dead.
All this scientific evidence is identical to the evidence of Jimi’s drug overdose, thus debunking the bogus and ridiculous phony “wine drowsing claim” perpetrated by an ex fraud doctor and a serial internet troll.
Hi Jason, Everything that was witnessed and said about the state Jimi was in by the ambulance officers, emergency doctors and Dr.Teare is consistent with and confirms an overdose. There was no mention of any other substance contributing to Jimi’s death. Dr. Teare recorded what he saw I don’t think he went through an elimination process where he singled out the most obvious reason for Jimi’s death. Dr. Teare would have recognised, just by looking at Jimi, that this was an overdose even before performing the autopsy.
Terrific information here Jason. What happens to the body when someone overdoses is horrific. A real wake up call for anyone not following medical directions. Dr. Teare would have witnessed all of this during Jimi’s autopsy, and there was no mistaking how Jimi actually died from reading the information above.
Marilyn Monroe died in a similar way to Judy Garland having taken too many barbiturates. In Marilyn’s case the coroner suspected suicide as she had a history of mental health issues. With Jimi, Dr. Thurston stated the reason Jimi took so many pills couldn’t be determined so he ruled out suicide in favour of accidental overdose.
Would have been a horrible sight to have witnessed and Reginal Jones and John Saua saw it first hand up close immediately recognizing it was an overdose.
This scientific information is identical to how Jimi died totally debunking all this bogus wine garbage being peddled by a serial internet troll.
A dose of 1gram of barbiturates can cause toxic poisoning.
Assume severe poisoning if 10 times the dose has been ingested.
Isbell, H.: Acute and chronic barbiturate intoxication.
JASON says: The doses listed above is less than what Jimi Hendrix ingested on September 18, 1970.
Jimi Hendrix had 1.8 grams of barbiturates in his system.
Jimi Hendrix took 18 times the normal dose of Vesparax.
Medical science says that Jimi Hendrix died from a lethal overdose since he went over the lethal level of barbiturates. So, this nonsense that Jimi had a “famous tolerance to drugs” and 9 pills couldn’t kill him is a bunch of crap. Making up bogus lies that Jimi needed a 10th pill is also a bunch of crap. Those scientific numbers are documented for regular barbiturates. Vesparax was a powerful barbiturate that included 3 drugs which made the 9 pill overdose more lethal cuz of the potency. 9 Vesparax pills returned a 0.7mg above lethal reading in Jimi. 1.8 grams of barbiturates was 18 times the normal dose. Medical science states that 1 gram can cause toxic poisoning and 10 times the normal dose causes severe poisoning. At 1.8 grams and 18 times the normal dose, Jimi Hendrix had severe barbiturate poisoning that was confirmed by Dr. Teare at the inquest.
At such a high dosage, Jimi would have died shortly after taking the Vesparax. It’s just stupid and burying your head in the sand to think that the pills didn’t directly cause Jimi’s death.
Jimi arrived back at the flat around 3am and Dr. Crompton estimated that Jimi died around 4am. So, Jimi died within the hour after the took the 9 pills in the 3 o’ clock hour. That’s how lethal and fast a 9 pill Vesparax overdose will kill you.
Hi Jason, I’d love to know what Monika was doing during that hour. I just hope she wasn’t standing around watching Jimi die and doing nothing to help him. No clear thinking person would do something like that. Jimi was found fully clothed on top of the bed covered in vomit like we know so it’s possible she just neglected him when he most needed help. In the Warner Bros documentary Monika said Jimi was breathing normally, checked his pulse but she couldn’t wake him while waiting for the ambulance which is odd in itself because Jimi died around 4am and the ambulance arrived at around 11am. She told Sharon Lawrence she washed sick off Jimi’s face with wine which isn’t consistent with what the ambulance officers saw -all that black vomit.
I would too but that’s something we will never know.
Monika said she gave Jimi the pills and then gave him some more. So, after he took more of the pills he was out like a light on the bed. She claimed to have taken a pill herself which would make her sleep as well. But Burdon said she called him at dawn which would mean she didn’t get any sleep or take a pill.
Monika gave Jimi the pills and then he got sick on them. Monika started to panic and didn’t know what to do which is why she started calling around. She was a 23 year old girl then who had a Superstar in her room and it’s easy to see how she didn’t want to get caught up in it being held responsible for her pills being the cause of it.
Yeah, all black and brown vomit and nothing red from wine was present on the pillows or the bed. That also is evidence of no phony “wine drowning” since the red wine would have been the first thing the ambulance men would have seen.
I get the feeling that Jimi was already dead when Monika made her first phone call and then her subsequent call to Eric Burdon. He asked her twice to call the ambulance; over the years they accused each another of not telling the truth about what was said over the phone. When Eric Burdon arrived at the hotel he noticed the word LOVE written on the back screen of Monika’s car apparently in Jimi’s handwriting done in foggy weather??? Eric said at first he was a fan of Monika believing that she was engaged to Jimi but then came to regard her as an obsessive stalker type fan.
Dr. Crompton estimated that Jimi did no later than 4am and the call Monika made was after 5am, so yes, Jimi would have been already dead.
I like what this thread has turned into without the hoaxer serial troll, and just sticking to the facts and analysing what really happened to Jimi. There is no more dealing with imaginary scenarios and false long winded rants, and trying to justify over and over what we both said.
I agree. Those long winded rants were pointless since it was all fiction and fantasy. Facts matter and the truth always will beat fiction.
People who were closest to Jimi, and journalists who interviewed him before his death agree that Jimi was in a positive frame of mind and planning for the future. He had booked his ticket to New York and looking forward to getting back to his studio. This contradicts what Sharon Lawrence said in her book about Jimi committing suicide to coincide with the number 9 and reinforces Dr Thurston’s ruling of accidental overdose.
How could 9 pills not be an over dose?
Exactly, April. The regular dosage for Vesparax is half a tablet. Jimi took 9 and unfortunately they led to his death.
9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate…It is firm well-known science that Lethal Dose cannot be reached with less than 2000mg…That’s why the manufacturer listed 9 to 10 pills as being a Lethal Dose….That same barbiturate science dictates that a person with a tolerance requires more than 2000mg…In Jimi’s case it could be 3000mg to reach Lethal Dose…The Underwriter’s Laboratory case study of Vesparax overdoses showed that persons who took 10 to 15 tablets never died in less than 4 hours…Jimi only took 9 and died 1 to 2 hours after taking them…This is clear evidence that the wine Jimi was drowned in killed him not the pills…
LOL.
The wine troll came back. Keep posting your b.s. crap.
9 Vesparax pills killed Jimi Hendrix and there wasn’t any fake imaginary wine.
I just posted scientific data that refutes the crap you peddle.
There is no such thing as a 2000mg or 3000mg overdose threshold especially for Vesparax.
Overdoses occur with the first hour so your crap is debunked.
The manufacturer never listed 9 or 10 pills.
Jimi took 9 pills and you state that was lethal so you debunk your own b.s.
Same old trolling hoaxing garbage that’s already been debunked.
Jimi inhaled vomit not wine.
Hi April, Right again there was no wine involved. The autopsy results state very clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication.
How could this theory be possible? Someone who was already dead from drowning in wine couldn’t vomit and then inhale the vomit.
Hi April, You’re obviously thought things through. Conspiracy theories don’t rely on logic they seek out the gullible. Jimi died around 4am and he vomited because he was dying from the effects of the barbiturate overdose.
As I’ve pointed out before, it’s not possible to be “drowned in wine” and then be profusely vomiting afterwards. The bogus claim is that Jimi was “drowned to death” with bottles of wine. If Jimi was “drowned” in that imaginary wine, he would be dead and couldn’t be vomiting all over himself and the bed. The imaginary wine would have killed him and that would be it. The fact that there was all that vomit on the bed, and fluid in his chest, proves it was an overdose. That’s what happens from an overdose, the person gets violently sick from it. The bogus conspiracy claims of “wine” are a bunch of crap cuz it’s the complete opposite of how Jimi died.
The vomit witnessed on Jimi by the ambulance attendants was the classic action/reaction result of forced drowning…It clashes with the claimed lack of any vomiting reflex due to the barbiturate…With that amount of vomit obviously Jimi’s gag reflex wasn’t inhibited…What you are seeing there with the extreme vomit was Jimi’s body making one last survival surge in reaction to forced drowning…You won’t find that in any other Vesparax overdose case…You foolishly don’t realize you are only proving my case for me and the “vomit” was wine…That is why when Dr Bannister removed the vomit in the throat there was all wine below it in the lungs and stomach (thank you)…
LMAO.
When you are drowned, you are dead, moron. You can’t vomit when you’re dead. That’s why your bogus theory is a joke.
I think the most laughable conspiracy theory is that Jimi faked his own death and decided to head to Hollywood and try acting becoming Morgan Freeman. 😂
Haha. That was a good one.
You still can’t beat the random “London thugs” who just happened to be passing by the flat with “bottles of wine” LOL.
Hi Jason, Maybe I should start a new conspiracy Jimi is living at Graceland with Elvis, Jimi Morrison, and Janis Joplin. LOL.
Haha. Yeah you totally should. Lenny Bruce stopped by to tell some jokes.
Don’t forget to mention they are all recording new sessions for an Underground album. Michael Jeffery is producing the Elvis and Janis duet. LMAO
BUSTER says: 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate…It is firm well-known science that Lethal Dose cannot be reached with less than 2000mg…That’s why the manufacturer listed 9 to 10 pills as being a Lethal Dose….That same barbiturate science dictates that a person with a tolerance requires more than 2000mg…In Jimi’s case it could be 3000mg to reach Lethal Dose…The Underwriter’s Laboratory case study of Vesparax overdoses showed that persons who took 10 to 15 tablets never died in less than 4 hours…Jimi only took 9 and died 1 to 2 hours after taking them…This is clear evidence that the wine Jimi was drowned in killed him not the pills…
JASON says: The debunked troll is still repeating his same phony debunked claims.
Repeating the same garbage over and over is never going to make it true.
Get some mental help.
Hi Jason, I thought we were rid of the troll.😒
This troll has a mental problem and still feels the need to post his made up fantasies.
I see Dr. Yates is back peddling his garbage again. Jimi vomited because of the overdose of barbiturates nothing else caused that vomiting as there was no other high dose toxic substance found in his system during the autopsy. Dr Teare was very specific in his assessment if he had any doubts he would not have reported and published what he found. Strange how all that wine escaped the eye of the experienced Dr. Teare and he had no knowledge of it.
Dr. Yates must have broken out of the insane asylum to post this ridiculous nonsense. He can’t get over the fact his hoax has been demolished.
His fake narration makes you laugh.
BUSTER says: The vomit witnessed on Jimi by the ambulance attendants was the classic action/reaction result of forced drowning…It clashes with the claimed lack of any vomiting reflex due to the barbiturate…With that amount of vomit obviously Jimi’s gag reflex wasn’t inhibited…What you are seeing there with the extreme vomit was Jimi’s body making one last survival surge in reaction to forced drowning…You won’t find that in any other Vesparax overdose case…You foolishly don’t realize you are only proving my case for me and the “vomit” was wine…That is why when Dr Bannister removed the vomit in the throat there was all wine below it in the lungs and stomach (thank you)…
JASON says: Forensic analysis showed no wine in the vomit or inside Jimi Hendrix. It was only high toxic levels of Vesparax.
This is total hilarious bullshit. If Jimi was being drowned in liquid, he would be unable to vomit since the liquid would suffocate him instead of vomit. That never happened and you are a a total moron clown.
Fraud Bannister didn’t “remove” anything.
You were claiming that Siefert did it, so you don’t even know which lie you are telling.
There is no medical records of any fake procedures or phony wine. No wine was analyzed in Jimi’s stomach during the autopsy.
You are a clown and we all laugh at you
I’ve been reading about the history of waterboarding it dates back to medieval times. It gives the poor victim a sensation of drowning as a cloth is placed over the nose and mouth and water poured at regular intervals. Imagine using wine in this fake story with Jimi when water could have been used??? Who comes up with this garbage and believes it repeating over and over something that never happened in real life-Buster.
Exactly.
Waterboarding is not used as a murder method but this moron keeps posting it anyway. The phony Dr. Yates was trying to claim it was a mafia hit. They don’t use waterboarding with wine to kill people. It’s a bunch of made up garbage. He reads bogus conspiracy stories and then adds his own tales of fiction.
The Mad Doctor Brian “Buster” Doyle Yates is back out on the loose writing more 50 year old fantasy prescriptions for his patient Jimi Hendrix
BUSTER says: 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate…
JASON says: 9 Vesparax equals 35 Mandrax pills. That is a massive overdose.
BUSTER says: It is firm well-known science that Lethal Dose cannot be reached with less than 2000mg…
JASON says: This is a fantasy claim made up by this troll “Buster”. Nothing in science says this.
BUSTER says: That’s why the manufacturer listed 9 to 10 pills as being a Lethal Dose….
JASON says: The manufacturer did not list this and you can’t post this cuz it does not exist. Again, you’re admitting that 9 pills are lethal. That debunks your hoax.
BUSTER says: That same barbiturate science dictates that a person with a tolerance requires more than 2000mg…
JASON says: You have no idea what “Jimi’s tolerance” was and it certainly wasn’t 35 Mandrax pills cuz that’s what 9 Vesparax equals.
BUSTER says: In Jimi’s case it could be 3000mg to reach Lethal Dose…
JASON says: “Could be” this troll says. He has no idea. Now you have Jimi swallowing up to 72 Mandrax pills. GTFOH.
BUSTER says: The Underwriter’s Laboratory case study of Vesparax overdoses showed that persons who took 10 to 15 tablets never died in less than 4 hours…
JASON says: This is bogus, cuz I’ve posted a scientific study that showed a victim who died in 20 minutes after a Vesparax overdose and a victim who died only after taking 10 times the amount when Jimi took 18 times the normal amount.
BUSTER says: Jimi only took 9 and died 1 to 2 hours after taking them…This is clear evidence that the wine Jimi was drowned in killed him not the pills…
JASON says: 9 pills is an overdose, moron. That’s the equivalent of 35 Mandrax pills. Jimi couldn’t swallow 35 pills and still survive. The autopsy proved the 9 pills destroyed his liver with a toxic 3.9 reading.
Jimi’s autopsy proved the 9 pills killed him and there wasn’t a “wine drowning”, idiot. No wine was ever witnessed at the flat and no wine was ever detected inside Jimi’s body at the autopsy. You have zero evidence to prove any of this. Same old debunked crap you peddle.
Hi Jason, there’s absolutely no logic in what Dr. Yates says and never will be. Nothing he puts forward makes any sense to a reasonable person since what he writes is pure fantasy and not based on fact. You’d have to be a complete moron to think that 18 times the recommended dose of a pill will not kill you. Dr. Yates is a writer of science fiction he can take you anywhere he wants with his fantasies because they’re not real. It’s up to the reader to resist his rubbish and see it for what it really is- a work of pure fiction. Dr. Yates doesn’t care much about the truth he just wants to put his hoax out there time and time again. 🤪
Hi Ivana,
The delusional doctor has no idea how potent Vesparax was which contained 3 components. He keeps whining it was “only 9 pills”. Well, 9 pills is an overdose and 35 Mandrax pills the equivalent of 9 Vesparax pills. No way can a person take 35 barbiturates and still survive. Yet, this clown says Jimi could take up to 3000mg which would be 72 Mandrax pills. Who the hell could take 72 pills at once and still live to talk about it? That’s why Dr. Doyle Yates is just a hoaxing clown who makes up asinine claims for attention.
Came across an ad placed in a skating magazine by Monika looking for work in the U.S as a skating instructor giving her age, and address in Germany. Strange behaviour for someone who was supposedly involved in Jimi’s death with Michael Jeffrey to be so open with personal details you’d think she’d keep a low profile. Yes folks another hoax.
Jason will never be able to find any 9 tablet Vesparax overdose victim who died in 1 or 2 hours covered in a profuse amount of vomit with his lungs and stomach flooded with wine with only a 5mg blood alcohol content…The reason Jimi is the only known person with those forensic particulars is because he was murdered by forced drowning in wine…There is no need to further respond to our resident “cuz” troll and his demented nay-saying…
Serial troll “Buster” is admitting defeat.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital and the autopsy confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose. Not one medical document or report on Jimi exists about fake imaginary wine.
Serial troll Buster instead claims a phony “wine drowning”, but for 11 years, he has never shown one single shred of evidence for his fake imaginary wine.
No wine was ever witnessed at the death scene and forensic analysis of Jimi’s body never detected any wine in his lungs or stomach. Fake fantasy claims of wine from serial troll Buster doesn’t cut it.
That’s good, that means I won’t have to read the bogus and debunked repetitive garbage you post. Hooray!
Buster=🤡🤥🤪
Ivana, that Pinocchio nose needs to stretch across the screen with all the lies Buster has told for bogus hoax. LOL.
The clown suits him well.
There were no signs of violence detected during the autopsy. The esophagus would have shown signs of bruising and the stomach would have been bloated from all that liquid. The bladder would have been filled with wine and it would have shown a higher reading of more than 46ml. Who exactly held Jimi down while this bogus waterboarding was going on if it was only Monika and Michael Jeffrey. Jimi would have easily escaped from these two or simply refused to open his mouth. The Vesparax killed Jimi in a short amount of time because he was found fully clothed on top of the bed covered in black vomit which is consistent with death from an overdose. There was no other substance at a lethal level found in his system.
Is there a wine hoaxer in the audience who can find any documented evidence of this imaginary wine? Anybody? Anybody at all.
Serial troll “Buster” had 11 years and has failed to find it. He can only make phony assertions that it happened and can do nothing else. That is pathetic.
Someone needs to step up to the plate for this debunked hoax. It becomes more hilarious each time this clown “Buster” asserts there was a “murder by wine” but never has any evidence to prove except for his hoaxing fantasy tales.
Hi Jason, Good luck with finding someone for this hoax since it all stems from Buster’s imagination. LOL 🤪
Buster can always use one of his pseudonyms pretending to be another Jimi Hendrix “murder expert”. LOL.
The press reports written immediately after Jimi died suggested that Jimi died as a result of drugs overdose. The more sensationalist papers called him a drug addict and another said drugs were directly responsible for his death. After the inquest however all the insinuations disappeared and were replaced by the real cause of Jimi’s death-inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. Michael Jeffrey said in an interview he did not believe it was suicide unlike Eric Burdon who thought that Jimi’s “Story of Life” poem was a suicide note. On the other hand, Dr. Thurston said there were no signs that Jimi deliberately intended to commit suicide so he ruled accidental overdose in Jimi’s case.
Dr. Thurston also never said anything about imaginary wine.
I still can’t believe anyone would fall for that wine hoax. The whole story sounds fake. Five bottles worth of wine pouring out of Jimi, in casualty, who had been dead for hours supposedly murdered by his manager and girlfriend by waterboarding. Doctors working on a patient who was long dead in an attempt to resuscitate him. The first attendants at the flat that morning missed all the wine Jimi was soaked in and saw only vomit. Dr. Teare also saw no wine and ruled this an overdose when he conducted the autopsy. How is the absence of wine explained by tin foil hatters it’s all a coverup of course with everyone involved with Jimi that morning coerced into changing their story. Who would be gullible enough to fall for a hoax like that?
It’s so fake it’s hilarious. Don’t forget the story changes with the CIA, MI5 or MI6, mafia all being involved. Can’t forget about the black panthers, the London thugs, and Mitch Mitchell. Even Eric Burdon was accused of being involved. Jimi being forced with wine and then not being forced with wine. Jimi having pills shoved down his throat and then being drugged with pills conveniently being placed nearby from covert special agents. Monika was supposed to be a secret agent too at 23 years of age. Dry vomit becoming red wine that no ambulance man witnessed. Doctors working frantically on Jimi’s dead decomposing corpse trying to bring it back to life after 7 1/2 hours of being dead. Fraud Bannister doing Frankenstein procedures on Jimi and dumping out Jimi’s bodily fluids not documenting anything. Then everybody is in on a cover up to this very day according to Buster. All this trouble this hoaxer says the British government is going to go through for just one musician. Give me a freaking break. Seriously, there isn’t one stable plot in this bogus hoax. It hinges on “could be” and “probably” as Buster makes it up as he goes along. He believes in this fantasy murder and makes up his own evidence on how he wants to believe it happened. No evidence and nothing but lies and made up stories. That’s why he has to invent his pseudonyms so his multiple personalities can believe it. This nonsense wouldn’t even be written in the worst Hollywood script. The entire hoax is asinine. Buster had 11 years to craft his hoax and this is the best he can come up with? Head shaking stuff.
This plot wouldn’t even make a B grade movie script.
Hey folks! Here’s another reminder of just what a lying trolling hoaxer “Buster” is. We don’t really need another reminder cuz we all know what he is….a lying hoaxing troll. But again, we will see how “Buster” lies and changes his fake stories for his hoax when it suits him, like he has done again below. Buster doesn’t still understand that we have all his lies, story changes, and contradictions ready to go when he changes his fake stories on the fly.
Trolling like this is the reason why “Buster” is banned from every site and forum he tries to post on peddling this garbage. This is trolling at its worst folks!
BUSTER says: Oct 26, 2019
Bannister never saw the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat because Siefert and the nurses removed it before he got to the scene…
BUSTER says: October 29, 2019
Jason is lying when he says Bannister removed the vomit…I spoke to Bannister and he told me Siefert had gotten there first and removed the plug of vomit…By the time Bannister arrived the wine was visible in the throat and was no longer blocked…
BUSTER says: February 26, 2020
That is why when Dr Bannister removed the vomit in the throat there was all wine below it in the lungs and stomach (thank you)…
JASON says: So, Buster the wine troll said in his first 2 quotes that Fraud Bannister had nothing to do with removing the fake “hard plug of vomit”. Buster says Dr. Siefert removed it first before Bannister got there.
Now, on Wednesday, “Buster” changes his fake story telling us that Fraud Bannister had removed it himself witnessing the fake imaginary wine that never existed.
So “Buster”, who removed the fake “hard plug of vomit”? Was it Siefert or Fraud Bannister? Which it it? You can’t have it both ways.
“Buster” the hoaxing troll has lied again. “Buster” was caught red handed again changing his fake story. “Buster” claimed only Siefert removed it last year, and now “Buster” goes back to his buddy Fraud Bannister removing it. Buster lies so much and changes his fake stories he forgets which lies he tells. Just more proof this is all a bogus hoax perpetrated by a third rate clown.
This also proves “Buster” is lying about talking to Fraud Bannister, he never did, otherwise “Buster” wouldn’t be changing his fake stories all the time if it were true. Real accounts never change folks. Buster the clown changes his fake stories whenever he wants to. That’s why this is all a hoax made up by this joker.
And for the record, I never stated Fraud Bannister “removed vomit”, since no procedures were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix who was a dead decomposing 7 1/2 hour corpse.
No, Thank You “Buster” aka Brian Doyle, for showing the reading audience you’re even more of a lying hoaxing turd troll.
The bogus story changing of a serial hoaxer.
BUSTER says: Oct 26, 2019
Bannister never saw the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat because Siefert and the nurses removed it before he got to the scene…
BUSTER says: February 26, 2020
That is why when Dr Bannister removed the vomit in the throat there was all wine below it in the lungs and stomach (thank you)…
Can you believe this trolling clown “Buster” aka Brian Doyle?
Just constant continuous lies, contradictions, and fake story changing. For 11 years “Buster” has been pretending Jimi Hendrix had fake procedures done on him after he was a long dead 7 1/2 hour decomposing corpse. This man, Brian Doyle, needs severe mental help.
Unbelievable
Just proves what we’ve known all along Buster is a hoaxer that’s it. The truth never changes it remains the same.
I don’t think the writers of these bogus books about Jimi take what they’re writing seriously either they’re just out to make money hoping someone gullible enough like Buster will believe it. These dumb books more often than not end up in the bargain basement bin because of poor sales and disappear from shelves soon after.
I guess these books seem to be more about entertainment value. Rarely do you ever see a credible source from the author.
Hi April, If only the publishers would be more discerning with what they put out there.
i agree. seems more like weekly world news stuff to me.
Of course they don’t, they don’t care about Jimi Hendrix. They just use his name to make money off him as they use a bogus “hook” for their crappy book attempting to make money off it. The “hook” they use is maybe a paragraph or page which is made up to entice people to buy the book.
Speaking of that, I came across this bogus conspiracy book that I glanced at a few years ago but just looked through it again. Inside, it has bogus stories about how famous musicians were “murdered” instead of how they actually died. Mostly government conspiracy crap. The brief section on Jimi Hendrix was interesting though, all the garbage printed inside is what our “friend” Buster parrots word for word on here. The nonsense of Michael Jeffery being in MI6 and “murdering” Jimi with wine. The bogus story of Jimi firing Jeffery is in there too. Also, Monika’s lies are used as facts and no real sourced documentation is used. Just the same made up stories that Buster parrots here. So, Buster gets his crap from this book but also exaggerates his own phony claims along with it. The most hilarious part is the joker that wrote it says the date was September 17, 1971.
So Buster doesn’t even have the imagination to come up with this stuff himself. It’s all second hand information. What a goose.!
He steals other conspiracies and pretends its his own. But to his credit, he does exaggerate and make up his own as well
Just read a strange piece called the “Alternative Life Of Jimi Hendrix” Part 1 it’s meant to be a what if Jimi didn’t die in 1970. Jimi decides to stay on at Kameron’s party instead of going back to the Samarkand with Monika who he eventually breaks up with. If only!
Ooh….i think i read that. is that one of Jimi living in the 70s & 80s?
That’s the one.
How could a dead drowned man throw up wine?
Too many different stories are being told in these books.
Exactly April, Just go with your gut feeling what sounds plausible is a good start. I bought Chris Welsh’s biography ‘Hendrix’ in the early seventies he’s a rock journalist who interviewed most of the people closely involved with Jimi after he died. There are no accusations of murder, bogus wine drownings or cover ups.
Too many different stories is normally the sign of incriminating guilt in honest police investigations…Welch is looking out for his cowardly English ass and future rock journalism career…
Here we go again trying to bring down a reputable and well known journalist of the time. Chis is involved in the cover-up as well is he? What a joke! I suggest you take Jason’s imaginary award and place it on your imaginary mantle piece, disappear and take your lies with you.
Well folks, today is Leap Day, which means we get one more extra day in the year. So to celebrate the occasion, we get one more extra hoaxing story change from Buster the clown regarding the removal of the fake “hard plug of vomit” where Buster changes his fake stories when it suits him. This is called trolling, and Brian Doyle aka Buster, deserves an award for his decade of abusing forums with his trolling of fake story changing made up lies.
BUSTER says: Dr Bannister specified that he removed a plug of vomit from Hendrix’s windpipe and the wine then gushed out.
BUSTER says: Bannister never saw the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat because Siefert and the nurses removed it before he got to the scene…
JASON says: First Buster the troll says, Bannister removed the fake “hard plug of vomit” and now he claims Siefert removed it and Fraud Bannister wasn’t there. What a lying turd this troll is.
So Buster, who removed the fake “hard plug of vomit”? Was it Fraud Bannister like you first said or is it now Siefert as you changed it to? Which is it? You can’t have it both ways.
We, the readers of The Velvet Rocket, hearby honor Brian Doyle aka Buster (along with his many pseudonyms) as we present him with the Troll of The Decade Award 2010-2020.
Congratulations Buster! You sure have earned it with your tireless efforts to hoax Jimi’s death for 11 years and 10 years on this site with your phony made up Hendrix Murder Hoax.
Priceless, Jason, Love the Troll of The Decade Award.
$2 is still too much for that trash.
Someone doubted Harvey’s account of what happened between Jimi and Monika that evening. It’s odd that Jimi left Harvey’s with Monika while she was still verbally abusing him and had her drop him off at Kameron’s afterwards where she repeatedly pressed the intercom with other guests at the party telling her to go away. Interestingly, Jimi then leaves with her again returning to the Samarkand with this supposedly abusive girlfriend and then trusting her enough to take 9 of her sleeping pills.
Been reading some of the flattering things Michael Jeffrey said about Jimi’s musical ability, genius, creativity, and growing spirituality someone who Tappy Wright accuses of murdering Jimi with red wine in his dumb book. LOL 😂
Did that book sell copies?
Is it true Jimi had severe sleep apnea?
Hi April, A few of Jimi’s girlfriends apparently had to wake him after hearing him choking in his sleep. As for Tappy’s stupid book he admitted he made the whole thing up to Bob Levine. Someone on another forum said it was selling for $2. It’s nice to know some of us have good taste.
$2 is still too much for that trash book.
Seems that most of these books are only an opinion of the author.
Exactly April, The authors spread their lies without giving it much thought and unfortunately some people believe what’s written in them without question.
The thing I hate the most about these types of books is that they deliberately make accusations against people who are dead and can’t defend themselves. The authors know full well they won’t be challenged on anything they write, and have knowledge about posthumous defamation laws.
That’s what “Lying” Sharon Lawrence and Tappy “The Fraud” Wright did.
That encounter Sharon Lawrence said she had with Jimi at the nightclub where he was happy to see her and introduced her as his friend has been questioned as no one remembers seeing her in London at the time. Could be another phony story.
Lawrence contradicted her stories cuz she was first claiming Jimi “was out of it looking half dead” not even noticing her. Now he was happy to see her? I wouldn’t believe one thing Lawrence says.
Reginal Jones (Ambulance Man): He was covered in vomit. There was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was. His airways was completely blocked all the way down. His tongue had fallen back you see.
Reginal Jones: Sit him up! No, you don’t sit people up when they’ve choked.
John Saua (Ambulance Man): I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out, I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it.
John Saua: The vomit was all the way down.
JASON Says: Not one word of imaginary wine from these two professionals. Not one word of this fake “wine drowning” either. They both only witnessed dry vomit. If there was this phony wine splashed all around covering Jimi Hendrix, these men would have said so. These fake wine claims came later on proving there never was any fake imaginary wine.
Hi Jason, I know we’re said this before but Kathy’s investigation was very thorough there was never any mention of wine or foul play involved in Jimi’s death. Can you imagine these experienced men missing all that wine, I don’t think so. This was a drugs overdose.
There is no way they would have missed anything like that since red wine would be easy to spot. Especially “gallons of it” like the hoaxer claimed.
it’s always good to keep the readers informed that the phony wine is a hoax and was never witnessed at Jimi’s death scene.
This whole wine drowning plot is ridiculous to begin with. The practicality of holding Jimi down to pour wine into him when it was just Michael Jeffrey and Monika. Who did the pouring and who held Jimi down? He would have easily escaped those two or at least put up a good fight. This story has more holes in it than Swiss cheese. 🧀
The story is asinine. Stuffing a handful of pills in Jimi’s mouth and pouring bottles of wine down Jimi’s throat. Are we to believe that Jimi wouldn’t fight back? Gullible fools like Buster believed it and after the bogus story was admitted to be a lie by Wight. Buster made up his own fake tales to keep this charade going.
The phony motive was exposed as a lie as well since Jimi never fired Jeffery.
Plus there is no evidence of any of these phony claims. It’s all speculation, hearsay, innuendos and contradictions made up by wannabes.
Dr. Teare saw no signs of violence during the autopsy so it’s fair to say Jimi took the Vesparax willingly. Even when Wright admitted he made the story up Buster still couldn’t let go of it like you said Jason. I’m surprised Buster didn’t say Wright was coerced into changing his story by secret agents.
Signs of violence and trauma would have been detected with a phony story like that.
You were close Ivana, the serial troll Buster changed his story from “Jeffery waterboarding Hendrix with wine” to this garbage he made up.
BUSTER says: In the long-run whether Jeffery was actually at the Samarkand or not doesn’t matter. He arranged the whole thing and probably told Tappy Wright he was there in order to cover for accomplices involved in a much deeper intel plot.
JASON says: So, our lying serial troll “Buster” changed his story. Buster first said “Jeffery waterboarded Jimi to death wine wine” and then he changed it to “Jeffery arranged the whole thing and was covering for intel agents for a sinister plot”.
Just more garbage created inside the head of a certified lunatic.
Notice another “probably” from “Buster” who is just lying through his rotten teeth.
Buster named Jeffery as the main murderer and then he says “it doesn’t matter if whether Jeffery was actually at the Samarkand or not..
Of course it matters, cuz this serial troll named Jeffery as a murderer and now he is changing his phony story to some other nonsense he made up.
I think conspiracy theory books appeal to and target a specific audience. There’s very little or no truth in them. They’re on the same level as those gossip mags and tabloid press.
They appeal to simple minded gullible fools who will believe anything that’s written in a book.
Or in Buster’s case, any garbage claim he can use to push his debunked phony “Jimi Hendrix Murder Caper”.
Just like I posted before, all these garbage books are ‘Tabloid Journalism’ and it’s not to be taken seriously.
These books have zero credible sources and the quotes are made by dead people who can’t be contacted to verify it’s accuracy. That’s all we need to know and it’s why dead people are used as “sources” since they can not talk.
Morons like Buster believe this nonsense in these garbage books and claims they are “facts and evidence”.
Buster conveniently changes his stories when he’s been cornered or when it suits him. He tries to get himself out of a tight spot by inventing even more ridiculous lies. Only a fool would take him seriously or fall for anything he says.
About the tabloid press how they contrasted and compared Monika’s appearance with that of Kathy’s during the court case of the mid nineties. According to one paper Monika looked like a superannuated rock chick stuck in the 60’s whereas Kathy looked youthful with her up to date stylish haircut and suit having moved on from that time.
Some weird conspiracy theories: 1. 9/11 was an inside job. 2. The Earth is flat. 3. They didn’t actually go to the moon. 4. Big Foot, Yeti, Abominable Snow Man. 5. Pyramid shapes sharpen razor blades. 6. The face on Mars. 7. The Chariots of the Gods book. 8. Princess Diana was murdered by secret agents.
Loch Ness Monster & UFO’s
My favourite is the Bermuda Triangle. LOL
When Tony Brown interviewed Monika for his book he noticed that she would change the details with every telling. He asked to see the supposed letters that Jimi wrote to her but she refused as being too personal. I’m assuming these letters didn’t exist and were made up to save face. Monika came from a conservative background so I think she wanted to appear more than just another fling.
Saw two books written by Curtis Knight where he claims Jimi was a messenger sent from another planet in order to spread the message of love and peace. LOL. The book contains the interview Kathy gave to a journalist friend which was then rewritten to make Jimi appear in a very negative light which later on Kathy received an apology from the newspaper. There’s a photograph of Knight with Monika and Ed Chaplin who brought a lawsuit against Jimi for breach of contract which Jimi signed before he became famous.
Fake wine claims came from Fraud Bannister, Sharon Lawrence, and Tappy Wright. That tells you all you need to know.
Just two more dumb books in the same league as the above.
Nope, but the imaginary missing 5 bottles of wine is still trying to be located by our third rate hoaxer.
Jimi’s original and only cause of death was rewritten decades later to include the wine. No truth to it.
Fake story made up by Fraud Bannister in 1992 and fake published stories written by fraudsters after.
Only a fool would question and doubt Dr. Teare’s autopsy results. Funny how all that supposed wine escaped the attention of this experienced man and never made it onto the death certificate or in earlier biographies about Jimi.
We are supposed to believe these hoaxers who tells us there is wine when there is no evidence of it. LOL.
Massive gallons of wine invented in 1992 and it was never seen or documented in 1970. Only a true moron would believe these phony murder stories.
…..is there any credibility to the story that Jimi may have contracted some type of Corona virus administered to him in a cup of tea. The gallons of wine are at the bottom of the Thames….
Did you go diving and actually see the gallons of wine? 😂🍷
…unfortunately no, I live in Ukraine I suppose it would be a good time to find this mythical cache of wine and partake in it…..would have aged nicely by now for sure! ;)
Thurston, Teare, and Crompton covered it up. LOL
I think it’s time we answered the question ‘Was Jimi Murdered?’ asked on this thread and the answer is, wait for it, NO he wasn’t. 🙂
The answer is No!
Tak, khto ye pravda! :P
Jason, that third rate hoaxer will be looking well into his nineties for that wine. I want to wish him all the best with trying to find the five bottles. LOL.
Haha
By then I’m sure it will be 10 bottles to match the number of pills he claims Jimi needed.
Fraud Bannister claimed Hendrix was “soaked”. The ambulance men said he was covered in dry vomit.
7 1/2 hours later Hendrix would be dry.
Fraud Bannister lied with his made up wine stories.
Strange how Bannister failed to mention the wine back in1970 but remembers it decades later in great detail. I would never believe Bannister over the ambulance officers who were the first on the scene that morning.
I would never believe one word from Fraud Bannister. He “remembers” the decades later imaginary wine cuz he made it up in 1992. He couldn’t remember any real details about Jimi Hendrix from 1970. Thought he was “unusually tall” hanging over the trolley and “naked”. If Bannister said he had “vivid memories” he would have remembered everything including Jimi’s correct height that he wasn’t “unusually tall” and that he was wearing clothes. The ambulance men and Dr. Brown and Siefert remembered that.
Jimi was 5ft 11inches he wasn’t short but you can’t describe him as unusually tall like someone who plays basketball for example. I’m sure Bannister remembered another patient. He didn’t even know who Jimi Hendrix was. All his “memories” are suspicious.
Bannister made it sound like Jimi was 7 feet and hanging all the way off. Jimi wasn’t short but at 5′ 11″ he wouldn’t be hanging off either like Bannister was claiming. He never heard of Jimi at all and he got the idea of Jimi being “unusually tall” by looking at photographs. Noel Redding said they always photographed Jimi as being taller than him and Mitch as being “larger than life”. Bannister not knowing Jimi assumed he was “unusually tall” from the photos.
I’m thinking of the cover of the Are You Experienced album where Mitch and Noel are kneeling next to Jimi. In some other photographs Mitch and Noel are nearly always either sitting or squatting next to Jimi to make him look like the prominent person. At any rate Bannister got it all wrong.
There used to be an article from one of the Australian Newspapers from 1992 about Bannister being struck of the medical register for 3 counts fraud and malpractice but you needed a subscription to read the archives. Last time I looked I couldn’t find it anymore. Would’ve been interesting to have read that particular article.
Jason, the article you mention is from the Sydney Morning Herald. I came across the Medical Council of NSW, Bannister had six complaints of misconduct made against him.
Jimi Hendrix’s Biggest Problem Wasn’t Drugs – It Was Something Far Worse…
By Dylan Elijah at Rock Music Revival
Rock & Roll certainly wouldn’t be where it is today without the help of legendary guitarist Jimi Hendrix. To put it simply, he changed the game for guitarists all over the world with his prolific sound and style. Through his playing, charisma, and music, he was able to set rock music on the path to greatness. He was one of the best, pure and simple.
We could just go and on forever about how much of an impact Hendrix made on the world of music, but all of this you probably already knew. But the sad thing is, while he was essentially reshaping rock music, he was doing so while being robbed and working himself to the bone…
Many musicians will tell you that the life of being a famous touring musician is never an easy one. With really no downtime, no access to a decent meal, and a rigorous work schedule, this can all negatively affect the body and the mind. The same definitely happened with Hendrix, who essentially lived off of sleeping pills, alcohol, and psychedelic drugs during his tours, but matters were made WAY worse by something else, and that was his manager Chas Chandler.
Chas, former bassist for The Animals, managed The Jimi Hendrix Experience for the duration of their success and helped Hendrix and his band gain exposure all over the world essentially making them the world famous acts they would eventually become. The problem was that Chas grossly mishandled the band’s earnings and spent it all on himself.
At the height of their popularity, The Jimi Hendrix Experience were making roughly $100k per gig, which even today is a decent amount for a touring musician. Sadly, most of this money was not going to the band. Chas was keeping the majority of it for himself. Chas would regularly fly to the Bahamas and spend all of this money himself, while Hendrix reportedly usually only had two figures in his bank account.
This would essentially force Hendrix to have to work harder each night pulling off the crazy antics he was know for each night. This eventually burned him out completely. All this was in effort to try and get the same or a higher turnout each night to try and make up for the lost wages.
While this wasn’t the cause of his extreme substance abuse, it was very much a part of it. His friends and family attested to his noticeable unhappiness. Hendrix was overwhelmed and frustrated and it seemed that his only escape from the pain was drugs and alcohol. This would eventually lead to his death in 1970 where he choked on his own vomit as a result of an overdose.
Truly one of the saddest stories in all of rock & roll. One of the greatest careers in music shorted by blindside robbery and substance abuse. It just goes to show that you never truly know just who you can put your faith into…
I think Jimi was too trusting of the people around him, and too blasé about money it seems. I remember reading that he would ask the office for money and they would give it to him. He reportedly died with just $20,000 in his account. Michael Jeffrey and Chas Chandler were co-managers of The Experience and they set up an off shore account in the Bahamas which was supposedly a tax haven. Al Hendrix hired a lawyer to find out what exactly happened to Jimi’s earnings, and later on down the track the Hendrix Family did very well financially from Jimi’s catalogue.
The saddest part, for me, is that despite Jimi’s fame, friends and acquaintances he died in the flat of a relative stranger who he’d been with only a few days and taking her medication. The ambulance attendants found him covered in dry vomit dead for many hours in a state of neglect.
Chas Chandler was a bassist in The Animals before he went on to become Jimi’s manager. He brought Jimi back to England after being tipped off by Linda Keith about this amazing guitar player. 🎸
Yep, then Chas went to Michael Jeffery to help manage Jimi and also to help fund the act and secure contracts. So, this nonsense that Jeffery was “recruited by intelligence” to kill Hendrix is completely bogus since Hendrix was unknown at the time and had nothing recorded that was being played.
Hi Jason, I think Chas suggested ‘Hey Joe’ for Jimi’s first single. If anything these two managers, Chas and Michael, did a terrific job at promoting Jimi and turning him into the superstar he eventually became.
Hi Ivana,
Michael Jeffery worked hard to promote Jimi and secured a record deal with Track Records in the UK and with Frank Sinatra’s Reprise Records label in the U.S.
You are correct, “Hey Joe” was Jimi’s first single and Jeffery worked hard promoting it so it could receive airplay.
Michael Jeffrey reached the rank of Private in the army he was a good manager but hardly spy/intelligence material. He was particularly upset that Jimi was unable to reach him when he was waiting for Jimi in Spain at the Sgt Pepper Club that Michael owned. At Jimi’s funeral he was unable to leave his car because he was so sad about Jimi’s death.
My friend has a medical book and inside there is a section on how barbiturates were being used for suicide and assisted suicides.
There was one entry where a man helped with the assisted suicide of his wife who was suffering from terminal cancer in 1977. They were elderly at the time and were married for over 50 years. The man used 6 Vesprax pills and mixed it up in his wife’s yogurt. After she ate the yogurt she fell asleep and died from a barbituate overdose. This was from 6 pills and it caused death which is more than enough to kill someone.
A lethal dose. I wonder if the manufacturers of Vesparax had this information at hand.
Read an article about Jimi’s death from a Dutch newspaper and of course there was nothing printed about any imaginary wine. The article stated the hospital and doctors confirmed it to be a drug overdose and were waiting for an autopsy to make it offical. The police also found no evidence of foul play during their investigation. The article was written 9/19/70. Once again, the real story debunks the hoax.
Hi Jason, Only a very small number of people saw Jimi’s death as anything other than a drug overdose.
Shortly after Jimi died, Monika ran into a German reporter and she admitted she gave Jimi the sleeping pills. This makes complete sense because Jimi would not have known where Monika kept the Vesparax in her room at the Samarkand Hotel. There was no mention of any wine involved.
Hi Ivana,
Also, Jimi wouldn’t even have known Monika had pills unless she told him. Monika gave conflicting stories about the strength of the pills telling people they were “too weak” and others they were “too strong”.
It’s clear that she screwed up by giving Jimi too many pills and kept changing her stories so she wouldn’t be accused of negligently killing Jimi.
I wonder if she even knew Jimi took a “black bomber” at the party which contributed to Jimi’s overdose.
Hi Jason, I think Monika would have seen that Jimi was having problems relaxing and falling asleep so she either offered Jimi her sleeping pills or Jimi asked if she had anything in the apartment that might help him relax. It’s possible he mentioned the black bomber to Monika as a reason for not being able to sleep/relax. As we both know, Monika later accused various people of contributing to Jimi’s death.
She certainly did with her changing stories all the time. She was photographed in a fan magazine in the early 70’s holding her Hendrix portraits she made that were rejected for the artwork on one of Jimi’s posthumous albums.
Years ago I bought Monika’s ‘Inner World’ out of curiosity where she described herself as Jimi’s fiancée. Although she exaggerated her relationship with Jimi, her paintings are quite good. I liked the one with various historical figures depicted on a cross. The walls in Monika’s home were covered with her paintings of Jimi turning her home into a shrine. I think Steve Rodham described Monika as a life wasted.
Noel Redding wrote in his book that he believed Monika’s casual attitude allowed Jimi to die. She saw him taking the pills but didn’t stop Jimi from taking them despite knowing how strong they actually were. Jimi took nine when the safe dosage was half a tablet of the Vesparax.
Ginger Baker said the same thing. He said Monika didn’t take care of Jimi when he was sick. Ginger always maintained that if Jimi hung out him instead he wouldn’t have died of a drug overdose.
Hi Jason, Monika threatened Noel with legal action because of what he wrote in his book. Noel then rang Kathy Etchingham because he was afraid of losing his house and I think this is what partly motivated Kathy into starting her investigation. All of the things that came out of that investigation would have remained hidden otherwise.
Yeah, that’s true and especially when Monika told her wild stories in front of Kathy, Noel, and Mitch at Kathy’s house.
During the investigation, Monika hired a private detective for what exact reason I’m not sure since Jimi died in her apartment with her Vesparax in his system. This has always been the truth.
Probably to make it look like it wasn’t her fault. She accused others trying to escape the blame.
Hi Jason, Our idiotic “friend” is back.
Monika hired the private investigator in order to find out who was coming at her…She was trying to protect herself from her involvement in Jimi’s murder…Why would Monika hire a Private Eye for a simple drug overdose?…Ivana is dumb…She senses there is something is not right with this but refuses to admit the obvious…Monika probably hired the Private Eye to get dirt on people…That’s an Intelligence tactic…
Scotland Yard, the Attorney General and Kathy unearthed no murder plot during their investigations but Buster has managed to uncover something the experts have failed to detect. It’s obvious Buster was released too early from the psychiatric hospital for conspiracy theorists or he has forgotten to take his medication yet again. My comment was not an excuse for Buster to start regurgitating his nonsense again-murder that never happened.
Kathy was responsible for establishing the lies Monika told…Kathy was only willing to go as far as Monika…Kathy knows a lot more than she’s saying…Tony Brown took it further and I myself took it to proof of murder…To suggest that Nicholas Lyle or Scotland Yard made any attempt to uncover the truth is laughable…They never interviewed Dr Bannister and they avoided seeking the nurses…They were clearly covering-up their own complicity in their pretend investigation…Ivana says they never uncovered any evidence but that is because they weren’t really looking…Jason and Ivana are just two murder-denying trolls who have parked themselves here because the site doesn’t screen trolls…They would never pass the first muster of peer review in any credible venue…Lyle lied when he said there was no new evidence…Kathy had uncovered a mound of new evidence like the time of death being off by 5 or 6 hours and everyone lying…Ivana is just an ignorant denial idiot who first found out about the subject from this thread…A troll in other words…
Same old implausible scenario,tiresome arguments and tactics. Not a word of truth to any of it just coming from Buster’s supposed “facts”. 😴
George Floyd is actually a good comparison to Jimi’s death…Turns out George had 11 nanograms per ml of Fentanyl in his blood (a dangerous synthetic opiate 50 times more potent than heroin)…Lethal Dose can occur with as little as 7ng/ml in situations of poly-substance abuse…Obviously George was a regular user which meant he had a tolerance…This is obviously true since George can be seen lucid and walking around…Like Jimi, the drug in his system did not kill him…It was his being asphyxiated by people determined to do so that killed him…
I can’t believe what I’ve just read. George’s death highlighted the racist and negative attitudes towards black people. Despite his protestations that he couldn’t breath the police didn’t let up. The police officers involved have now been rightly charged with George’s death. George’s death had nothing to do with his drug taking or lack of it but was caused by bad treatment. Jimi on the other hand took a lethal dose of someone else’s medication willingly as the autopsy report showed no evidence of violence unlike George’s death.
It is simply outright false to say Jimi took a “Lethal Dose” of Monika’s Vesparax barbiturate…Not only was the .7mg barbiturate blood level not enough to kill Jimi but Jimi had a famous tolerance for drugs – including barbiturates…This was proven by his taking a “hand full” and washing them down with a pint of whiskey, as he was witnessed doing in Denmark a few weeks prior…During that event Jimi didn’t even pass-out…That event proved he had a significant tolerance to barbiturates and therefore the 9 Vesparax tablets he took were nowhere near any Lethal Dose…The idiot denier Ivana can’t get around the fact 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate and a person with no tolerance needs 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…Jimi had a notorious tolerance and would have needed at least 3000mg to overdose…Jimi did not die from the pills…He died by being forcefully drowned in wine as the attending doctors witnessed…
So, Buster is calling Kathy a liar now?
Same old recycled bogus nonsense you’ve repeated for months.
DR. Rufus Crompton read Jimi’s autopsy report confirming the 9 Vesparax pills were lethal destroying his liver.
After all this time you still don’t understand that Vesparax is a 3 component pill which is super powerful. Taking 9 Vesparax pills is the equivalent of 35 barbiturates. Nobody could survive that amount of pills in one setting, not even Jimi Hendrix. That’s why he died of a lethal overdose. 9 Vesparax is lethal.
Sorry troll, Dr. Bob Brown never witnessed wine on Jimi Hendrix when he was wheeled in dead into the hospital. He saw Hendrix first. Dr. Brown is on record confirming that Hendrix died from inhalation of vomit due to an overdose of barbiturates. That’s what the official record confirms.
Both ambulance men and the police confirmed Hendrix was covered in dry vomit. Not one professional ever mentioned wine at the flat or on the body of Hendrix. The analysis of Jimi’s body during the autopsy detected not a drop of wine on his skin. No wine was ever found! That means no wine!
3000mg’s. LMAO. You are so full of shit. You have no clue how many pills 3000mg’s of barbiturates equals to Vesparax.
9 Vesparax = 35 barbiturates
And you’re saying Jimi could swallow many more pills than that. What a freaking clown you are.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yate’s phony internet medical license has been revoked just like his pal Fraud Bannister’s in 1992. Both are a couple of fraudsters like two peas in a pod.
Same regurgitated nonsense. 🤪
Listen to and watch Rock Photographer Christian Treiber talk about the death of Jimi Hendrix on YouTube Rock History Music. This man knew Jimi personally.
You’re an idiot Ivana…Because you are only a shallow troll here to deny Jimi’s murder in a conspicuously stupid way you don’t realize Treiber confirmed that Jimi told him he planned to quit the rock business and spend his time relaxing somewhere in the country…If you had any smarts at all or Hendrix credibility you would realize that Treiber provided evidence for Jimi firing Jeffery with that witnessing and therefore witnessed the reason why Jeffery murdered Jimi…There were murder-denying trolls out there on the Hendrix internet (centered around Crosstown Torrents) that said there was no evidence for Jimi intending to fire Jeffery…Well there you have it in Treiber’s clearly spelled-out witnessing of Jimi telling him directly in London those last weeks of his intention to leave the industry…
Typically crazy stuff coming from you Buster. No where in this interview is there a mention of Michael Jeffrey. Jimi expressed a desire to take time off to study music properly in a few interviews. In the last few weeks of his life he asked a number of people to produce for him again including Chas Chandler so if Jimi wanted to quit the music industry it was obviously not on the agenda any time soon. You conveniently skip the part where Christian confirms that Jimi died as a result of taking Monika’s Vesparax- isn’t this the whole basis for your argument that Jimi was murdered? You are a typical conspiracy theorist seeing profundity where there isn’t any. You have been banned from a number of Hendrix sites because no one believes your absurd claims of murder.
Ivana is down-talking as if she was an authority who was growing tired of correcting me but the truth is she is just an internet troll who first learned of the subject when she stumbled in to this thread…Ivana is lying and the Treiber interview makes clear that Jimi was sending the message that he intended to quit the guitar playing business…Isn’t it kind of stupid for Ivana to not realize her own posting of Jimi going to Chas Chandler and asking him to take over was evidence of Jimi’s intentions to fire Jeffery?…Treiber has no clue about how Jimi died and is just parroting the official version like many other professionals who still needed work in the industry that was covering-up their knowledge of Jimi’s murder…I have spoken to witnesses who said it was common knowledge amongst industry insiders that there was foul play involved in Jimi’s death…Both Chandler and Burdon knew Jimi was murdered but covered it up because they were close enough to Jeffery to know how dangerous he was…Ask Ivana to show us the people who banned me from Crosstown Torrents and Electric Guru…They were not credible people…They were just social media philistines who were trying to get rid of the subject who didn’t have much respect for Jimi and were were just catering to internet feel-good idiots who want to limit the discussion to photos and music clips to make their sucking off of Jimi and his talent easier with less feeling of guilt for not giving a damn…
The crackpot is back with more half baked claims.
Jimi Hendrix never fired Michael Jeffery cuz he did not have legal authority to.
The autopsy and St. Mary Abbots Hospital both confirmed a lethal overdose confirmed through expert medical analysis. No signs of foul play.
Jeffery was in Spain with Hendrix still under contract until 1972. Kathy read & reviewed the contracts. Jeffery was not fired. Kathy laughs at crackpots like you.
That’s just stupid Crosstown Torrents-type denial Jason and it is not working…As we already covered many times, Jimi fired Jeffery in front of Monika at the Cumberland Hotel at around 5pm when he had her sit by the phone and witness it, as she wrote in her book…We know this is true because Steingarten was asked about that phone call and responded: “As a lawyer it is best that I do not respond to that subject”…Not only is Steingarten recognizing the call by saying that but he is also indicating that there was incriminating information in that call he couldn’t publicly admit…Our “cuz” troll Jason here suggests Jimi did not have the legal authority to sever Jeffery while he idiotically ignores in public that Jimi had already hired two Black Panther lawyers to scrutinize Jeffery’s books and therefore give him automatic claim to contract breach by Jeffery…This asshole Jason thinks he’s getting away with ignoring that…Jimi fired Jeffery at 5pm on September 17th…12 hours later he was dead under mysterious circumstances with everyone lying…Monika was threatened because of this information and died shortly after publishing it…As Ivana showed, Jimi was preparing to fire Jeffery by going to Chas Chandler and asking him to manage…
Jason is a certified idiot because St Mary’s could not confirm anything until the autopsy was done 3 days later…Jason refutes himself within his own idiotic post…Ask this lying asshole to show us the “expert medical analysis” that was done at St Mary’s…
You’re full of shit Buster. I’ve already debunked your hoaxing crap. You are a troll and a liar.
“While at the hotel, Hendrix made several telephone calls. Dannemann said he phoned his lawyer Henry Steingarten, asking him to find a way out of his contract with his manager Mike Jeffery, and producer Eddie Kramer, for whom Hendrix left a voice message.”
Nowhere does it say in that passage Jimi fired Jeffery. Monika said Jimi phoned Steingarten asking him to “find a way out of his contract.”
Jimi’s contract with Jeffery was ironclad. No way would Jeffery allow his client the opportunity to fire him. Jeffery’s contract with The Animals was ironclad too. They couldn’t fire him either.
Even Douglas was working out a way to possibly buy out Jeffery cuz Hendrix could not get out of the contract. Kathy saw that contract in 1992 and confirmed it.
Yes dumbass, hospitals have the capability and resources to run tests on patients to determine what substances they ingested. You must think the readers are stupid to believe the crap you peddle.
St. Mary Abbotts Hospital issued a press statement to the world announcing Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose. The autopsy later confirmed it.
More black panthers? You’re adding new hoaxing crap.
You are a troll. Your bogus hoax was debunked a long time ago. Now you came out of hibernation once again to embarrass yourself. Congratulations!
Jason isn’t too bright a denier troll because he doesn’t realize his posts only confirm what I am saying, that Jimi was working hard to get out of his contract with Jeffery…Jason is a dishonest little weasel because if you read his denial posts you’ll see he ignored the part about the two Black Panther lawyers Jimi had hired to look at Jeffery’s books…Those lawyers informed Jeffery that Jimi intended to fire him and that they were going to look at his books…While offering his half-baked denial material this toxic little piece of shit Jason has the balls to call one of the foremost authorities on the subject a “liar and troll” while offering what anybody who is well versed in the subject would know is a classic denial screed with all the classic equivocations, distortions, and omissions that have prevented the public from realizing the information that shows Jimi was murdered…There’s a nice place in hell waiting for this dark-sider scumbag Jason…
Douglas went to Jeffery and told him he would not try to take Jimi over after realizing he had taken on a powerful player he had no hope of wresting Jimi from…That’s why Jimi went to Chandler…
Jason is lying about the contents of the phone call to Steingarten from the Cumberland Hotel on 9-17…Monika made it quite clear that Jimi sat her down in front of the phone in order to have her be a legal witness to his firing Jeffery…The exact words were that Jimi told Steingarten that it was his will that Steingarten find a way to sever Jeffery whatever the contractual consequences…This little lying Crosstown Torrents weasel Jason is using the denier troll’s trick of focusing on dishonest semantics and deliberately vague references but Jimi was witnessed going around that last week trying to arrange for his studio tapes to be brought to London and also trying to arrange new management…Again, Jason isn’t too bright because Jimi did what the Animals did when they realized they had to get rid of Jeffery…They broke up the band…It is kind of dumb (or just sick) for Jason to not realize he is only backing me up by mentioning that…Jason has no curiosity about Burdon not saying a single word despite the huge public scandal since Tappy’s admission…Not a single word…Jason also dishonestly ignores that Christian Treiber witnessed Jimi announcing his intention to leave Jeffery when he told him he was leaving the business…It is not very honest to try to ignore that by means of sleazy Crosstown aggression…Jimi made that move at 5pm on 9-17, as Monika made clear, no matter how much scummy excuse-making and dishonest denial Jason attempts…
Jason is of course doing his usual arrogantly-worded lying when he says St Mary’s did tests…They did none and Jason is once again inserting something that he’s pulling straight out of his ass with firm authority while calling us liars…No, St Mary’s did not confirm any Lethal Dose nor can Jason show any credible evidence they did…Dr Bannister told me when they broke off they went to a rest room…Jimi was then taken to the morgue and no tests were done until the autopsy 3 days later…When the autopsy was done it found a trace blood alcohol content that conflicted with the assumed cause of death as well as a .7mg blood barbiturate level that was not enough to kill a person with a notorious tolerance…Not even close…
There’s a particular breed of degenerate scum who originate from the Crosstown Torrents website where denial of Jimi’s murder is supported by the feckless low-lifes who populate that site and only seek to pleasure themselves with Jimi’s treasure at his expense while banning any real Hendrix fans who stand up in his defense…Jason is one of their proud Alpha Jerks…
Dude, you’re so full of crap. Jimi had NO authority to fire Jeffery cuz the contract was ironclad. The contract didn’t run out until the end of 1972 which was confirmed by Kathy Etchingham after she reviewed the fine print in 1992.
So no, Jimi did not fire Jeffery as you lied about. I just added a passage where Jimi only inquired about getting out of his contract according to Monika. He did not fire Jeffery like you keep lying about.
There was no reason for Jeffery to have Hendrix murdered cuz he was locked up for 2 more years and there was nothing Hendrix could do to get out of the contract. So, your phony stories were exposed as a fraud once again.
St. Mary Abbotts Hospital had the capability to run tests on a dead patient. Buster the clown thinks they just looked at Jimi’s dead body without even knowing what happened. Every hospital in the world runs tests to determine the initial cause of death. Then they have an autopsy performed to obtain the official verdict.
St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed to the world announcing Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose with an official media press statement. A hospital would not make an absolute cause of death on a famous musician unless they were 100% positive. It would ruin their credibility.
Buster the clown still doesn’t know that number is a lethal dose of barbiturates. 9 Vesparax pills equals swallowing 35 barbiturates all at once. Jimi Hendrix could not survive swallowing 35 barbiturates all at once when only 5 pills made him ill not being able to perform in Denmark. Same old nonsense you came back to post. We’ve already gone over this before when you made a total jackass out of yourself.
You’re not an “authority” on Jimi Hendrix. You’re a hoaxer and a troll who makes up bullshit in order to sound important on the internet. Everything you spout off you’ve lied about for months and you’ve come back to do it again repeating the same old crap. You suppress the real events and add your fantasy version for your hoax. You’re a troll and a clown and always proven wrong.
I’ve read that the management contract was due to expire in December 1970…Typical of yourself and your intentional deception, the contract that was due to expire in 1972 was a separate contract probably with Warner Brothers…But even if it was the management contract that was due to expire in 1972 that doesn’t change the fact Jimi was bailing and wasn’t going to perform or contribute anything to Jeffery as per that phone call to Steingarten…Jason, you can’t just repeat “ironclad” over and over and think everything else goes away…There is a quote somewhere (that I’m not going to spend hours looking through my boxes for a denial troll who is only going to offer the same dishonest bullshit in response once he sees it) where Monika explains that Jimi severed Jeffery in that phone call and that Steingarten and Jeffery were going to have to work out the contractual consequences…What you denial trolls do is focus on semantics like the word “fire” so you can endlessly parse whether Jimi satisfied the exact definition of the word “fired”…You will spend endless effort at this disingenuous exercise that appears to be pursuing more truthful meaning but is really just a way of dodging the obvious preponderance of the evidence that all proves murder…You are a dishonest asshole Jason because it is more than obvious that what Jimi told Christian Treiber was not something he planned to do 2 years later…Jimi was witnessed taking extreme measures in that last week and he didn’t do that because he was going to make changes in 2 years…He did not go to Chandler and ask him to manage because he intended changes 2 years in the future…Eddie Kramer witnessed Jimi trying to get the master tape archives shipped to Olympic Studios in London…It was all part of a final move Jimi made because he thought Jeffery had something to do with Billy’s break down…We have a new witness who said he witnessed Jimi saying that…But, once again, you live in your own Crosstown Torrents denial delusion and you think if you name-call enough and lie you can get away with not answering that Jimi’s black lawyers informed Jeffery of Jimi’s intention to leave his management and scrutinize his books…You say Jeffery had no motive while trying to get away in public with ignoring a glaringly obvious motive, since Jeffery had embezzled millions and would have done jail time if his books were audited…
Jason is lying and St Mary’s did no tests…They cleaned the body and sent it to the morgue…Jason is once again delusional and warped by his own deception because he is dumb enough to not realize that Jimi’s death has been extensively scrutinized and there is no record or mention of any tests being done on him at St Mary’s…There would be a record that Kathy would have gotten if they had…Seifert was in charge and he would have remembered it since it would require documentation…As I said, Jason is really not that bright…They based their preliminary cause of death on what Monika had told them and the cops…
Jason contemptuously ignores that no matter how many times he uses that moron’s version of Vesparax forensics that, no matter how the tablet is configured, the science still goes by milligrams of barbiturate…He can’t get past the fact that 9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate – 450mg of which is slow-release Brallobarbitone…You can reference any University guide to barbiturate science and see that it takes 2000mg of barbiturate to reach Lethal Dose in persons with no tolerance…Jimi had a famous tolerance for drugs, including barbiturates and that put him well safe above any overdose – especially when he only had the pills in him for 2 hours or less and it takes 4 hours to overdose on Vesparax when you actually take a Lethal Dose in that range…You cannot get past this fact…The fact Jason ignores this and still tries to make his idiotic arguments anyway says all you need to know about Jason or the need to take him and his childish denial trolling seriously…
Any intelligent person can see the moronic level Jason deals at in his writings…He’s a primitive denier and Crosstown degenerate who is too fatuous to realize how outmatched he is or how his own answers expose him…
The readers haven’t forgotten your phony bluster and tall tales of Jimi Hendrix fiction. Just admit you’re a Hendrix novice not knowing anything about the real life events of this man. The conspiracy books you read are not real life accounts. It’s fake tin foil hat nonsense that never happened.
Kathy Etchingham reviewed Jimi’s contracts and said they had 2 more years to run. Michael Jeffery had an ironclad contract with Hendrix like he did with The Animals. There was no way he would have a clause where Hendrix could leave until the contract expired.
Chas Chandler was still under his Animals contract when he was managing Hendrix with Jeffery. The only way Chandler was able to leave his contract is that he had to buy Jeffery out in order to leave when Chandler split from Hendrix’s management.
Hendrix’s contract was set up the same way, which is why Douglas suggested to Hendrix that he could do the same as Chandler did, but wasn’t sure if Jeffery would go for it. Douglas was going to set up this proposal, but as he said it never happened cuz Hendrix died the next day of a drug overdose.
Buster lied about the call to Steingarten telling us Jimi fired Jeffery. Jimi had no authority to fire Jeffery, which is why Douglas was looking for a plan to get him out of the contract. Also, in that passage from the book I provided, Monika said “Jimi called Steingarten looking for a way to possibly get out of his contract”, it never said “Jimi fired Jeffery on the spot” since he was unable to. Buster has used this bogus lie for over a decade as the basis of his phony Hendrix Murder hoax. There is nothing “mysterious” about taking too many pills and overdosing on them.
So, the phone call meant nothing since Hendrix had no power to fire Jeffery. That also debunks this bogus “Jeffery murdering Hendrix” hoax. Hendrix was powerless and Jeffery knew it, that’s why Jeffery was able to control every aspect of the business knowing Hendrix had to do what Jeffery wanted. There was no point for Jeffery to kill Hendrix since Jeffery was never fired. This hoax is debunked once again.
Also, Hendrix attended Kameron’s party the night before he died. If Jimi actually fired Jeffery, he would have told all his friends and every guest at that party. Hendrix never said a word cuz he was unable to fire Jeffery, and he was still working with Douglas looking for a way to get out of the contract. Again, that proves Jimi never fired Jeffery cuz he couldn’t. Another deadly “dolly dagger” to the heart of this bogus “Jimi Hendrix Murder hoax” peddled by Hendrix novice Buster the Clown.
Yes, St Mary Abbot’s Hospital ran tests to determine Jimi’s cause of death and Kathy reviewed all the records including the autopsy report. How did you expect them to determine how he died? Just take a wild guess blurting it out to the world? Let’s not forget that Ambulance man John Saua said he scooped up a sample of Jimi’s vomit at the death scene. Saua had no idea what drugs Jimi took, so he scooped up a vomit sample so it could be tested to determine which drugs Jimi took.
This is from the London Times from 9-18-70:
“Mr. Hendrix, 27, was transported by ambulance to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival. Hospital officials later confirmed in a press statement that Mr. Hendrix died from an overdose of drugs.”
A hospital spokesman told the large gathering of press outside, “We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”
So, why would the hospital spokesman tell the entire world that Jimi died from a drug overdose if it wasn’t true? Obviously, they ran tests to determine the cause of death. They aren’t going to guess and put out a bogus statement on a musical superstar where they could get sued for spreading false medical information. They had to be 100% accurate.
Buster has no medical knowledge of how many milligrams Jimi Hendrix could tolerate. Buster is a clown upping the milligram numbers on purpose so he can pretend to claim Jimi didn’t die of an overdose. He is a total fraud and got caught red handed pushing this outrageous disinformation. The autopsy confirmed that 9 Vesparax pills was lethal to Jimi’s liver and he would have died anyway if he didn’t inhale the vomit.
Dr. Rufus Crompton confirmed the findings in Jimi’s autopsy report to Kathy Etchingham which she published in her book. 9 Vesparax pills are lethal which is the equivalent of 35 barbiturates. There is no way in the world Jimi Hendrix could survive swallowing 35 barbiturates all at once and still be alive to talk about it. That’s why Buster is mocked and is looked upon as a hoaxing clown troll promoting lies and half baked conspiracy theories. It’s total nonsense since nobody can survive 35 pills no matter how much of a “tolerance” you claim they have.
Buster is a crackpot tin foil hat kook and he is laughed at wherever he posts his Hendrix fiction. Buster’s nonsense has already been thoroughly debunked months ago, but here he is back at it again repeating it all over again. Give it up, you have been exposed again as nothing but a fool who spouts off asinine conspiracy
theories.
Intelligent people can see Jason protests too much and offers much too high a bluster to substance ratio in his replies…As I’ve pointed-out before, Jason is well referenced and comes up with a high level of detailed information on this subject when making up excuses…The smarter readers will realize that Jason’s reference ability clashes with the blathering playing dumb other side that he presents in this thread and that if he was that well referenced that he should have been able to also find the references and evidence I did…Jason is definitely a wicked dark-sider because the more credible of those who read this will understand he has no excuse for being that knowledgeable and referenced yet somehow missing the evidence I managed to find…
It is pretty obvious from Jason’s long-winded filibuster rhetorical reply that he is not going to honestly admit that Treiber witnessed Jimi’s plans on how he would get around that “ironclad” contract with Jeffery…If you read Jason’s replies he has yet to acknowledge that Jimi’s two black lawyers were going to scrutinize Jeffery’s books and told him so…Also, pay attention to how Jason just bullshits right over the top of my mentioning that Jimi’s management contract with Jeffery was going to expire in December 1970 and that the contract that expired in 1972 was a sub-contract with Warner’s…Another thing Jason thinks he is getting away with is his ignoring how once Jimi’s black lawyers proved Jeffery had embezzled millions how that would have legally nullified any contract Jeffery had with Jimi by default…Being a lying con man, Jason always keeps the onus against Jimi but he dishonestly ignores that Jeffery’s stealing is the greater legal determiner that gives Jimi the authority and upper hand Jason insists Jimi doesn’t have…Jeffery forfeits his contractual rights once he is jailed for stealing…Jason plays dumb and pretends he doesn’t see that once Jimi makes a public issue over his boycotting Jeffery, as he told Treiber, it then draws media attention to Jeffery’s management of Jimi…Especially his book-keeping…In Jason’s scummy world of denial all you have to do is keep repeating “ironclad” over and over and all this goes away…
Please pay attention to how Jason avoids discussing the contents of that phone call to Steingarten by switching the subject to Jimi having no authority to fire Jeffery…Anyone can see Jason running from his own knowledge that Jimi gave Jeffery his notice in that call…Jason tries to focus on the precise semantic meaning of the word “fire” in order to avoid honest discussion of the fact that after a week of preparing to replace Jeffery Jimi finally made the move at 5pm at the Cumberland with Monika as a deliberate witness…Monika said that in that phone call Jimi told Steingarten that it was Jimi’s will that his relationship with Michael Jeffery be severed no matter what the contractual consequences and that Steingarten was to proceed on that basis…Pure proof that this is true is Steingarten’s unwillingness to talk about it even though he acknowledged the phone call…Steingarten refused to talk about it because he knew it was directly tied to Jimi’s death so he covered-up for his client Jeffery…
Once again Jason is in delusional denial of the fact that if St Mary’s had done tests on Jimi they would have recorded them and entered them in the autopsy and Inquest documentation…Jason is a sick pup and is just outright lying here…He is also referencing media articles that used broad terms to describe the broad assumptions that were made early on…Jason is an asshole who demands strict documentation from us but then lies and distorts when it comes to documents he can’t produce…There were no tests done at St Mary’s…Jimi was washed and sent to the morgue…The overdose claim was gotten from Monika’s statement…
Jason’s blathering filibuster is conspicuously unintelligent and publicly fails to answer my barbiturate overdose science that Jason dismisses with a hand wave…The bottom line is anyone can check it out and a person with no tolerance requires 2000mg to reach Lethal Dose…9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate so Jimi, with his famous tolerance, would have required a lot more…Probably as much as 3000mg…That’s why the manufacturer lists that Lethal Dose is 9 or 10 tablets (because 9 isn’t enough)…Ask Jason how, if Jimi was 200mg short of Lethal Dose, did Jimi get a fatal dose in his liver?…Jason is a delinquent internet scum who is out of his league and way outmatched by myself…He’s too dumb to realize how he looks and thinks people don’t see his squirming excuses…
Dr Crompton confirmed that Jimi died at a time that was impossible for him to die that way while only having a .7mg blood barbiturate content…The 5:30am time of death confirmed by Crompton proved that Jimi only had the pills in him for 1 or 2 hours and that wasn’t long enough to overdose…Nor were 9 Vesparax enough to cause overdose in a person with Jimi’s known tolerance…You can see Jason’s self-delusion manifest as he tries to convince himself Jimi took 35 pills instead of the 9 he actually took…Almost as if Jason has to convince himself of something he knows he doesn’t believe…Meanwhile Jason still hasn’t answered the 2000mg science, which is how these things are normally done…
Buster the serial troll is still wants to claim Jimi Hendrix was “murdered” after he’s been totally debunked. What a clown.
St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose where the hospital officials along with Dr. Bob Brown addressed the media in attendance. The London Times as well as major newspapers around the world reported Jimi’s overdose in their evening edition on 9-18-70. They didn’t print “broad assumptions” it was the facts. That’s nearly 50 year old documented sources that Buster the Clown doesn’t have. He only has his denials and fake narrated stories.
Dr. Rufus Crompton concluded that Jimi had a lethal overdose at 0.7 toxic level well above the 0.5 lethal level. He also told Kathy Etchingham that it destroyed Jimi’s liver and he would have died anyway, but the vomit suffocated him causing a quicker death. That is another documented source Buster doesn’t have.
Jimi’s contract was ironclad and he had no authority to fire Jeffery. Kathy Etchingham reviewed the contracts herself and confirmed it. Alan Douglas also agreed since he was trying to find a way out for Jimi. Jimi’s phone call to Steingarten was an inquiry for him to “look for a way out of his contract”. Jimi was unable to fire Jeffery. Again, more documented sources that Buster does not have. He has his hoaxing lies, fake narrated stories, and bullshit denials suppressing the real evidence.
Buster, post a documented source that confirms “Jimi fired Jeffery”. Buster won’t be able to find one cuz it never happened.
Jimi spoke to his lawyer one day before he died. Michael Jeffrey would not have known anything about Jimi’s intentions to fire him in that short amount of time as the papers would never have reached him. Lawyers don’t discuss important matters over the phone but do this in person; Michael Jeffrey would have needed time to find and contact his lawyers to address Jimi’s intentions. As is well known Michael was in Spain waiting for Jimi to arrive for a short break he was not in London.
Jimi accompanied Alan Douglas to the airport. He was one of several people Jimi asked to produce for him. Apparently Chas Chandler wasn’t interested in taking on this role again. In interviews after Jimi died, Michael Jeffrey was unaware that Jimi had intentions of firing him.
The reason I included Christian Treiber is to show that no one who knew Jimi personally or was close to him believed he was murdered. This whole murder nonsense was invented by Tappy Wright and later denied as a lie in order to sell books. Unfortunately some people like Buster have not understood this and keep peddling the lie that Jimi was murdered by his manager Michael Jeffrey. Michael Jeffrey was in Spain at the time and not in London so this supposed murder could not have taken place. Buster is deliberating distorting the facts to suit his murder claims. None of this is evidence or fact; it is speculation.
Ivana is a simple-minded moron who thinks her moronic reductions of the highly complex evidence discussed in this thread is answerable by her retarded kindergarten version that she is obviously retreating to because she knows she’s been out-argued in the last few posts…Meanwhile Monika Dannemann was recorded saying in 1975 on Glebbeek’s Amsterdam radio show that “There was evidence I can not say in public…Jimi was murdered for sure”…In 1990 Noel Redding said “Jimi’s death was awfully convenient for Michael Jeffery”…That was 19 years before Tappy’s admission…In 1990 Bob Levine made it clear he warned Jimi not to sign an insurance policy with Jeffery as the beneficiary…Obviously what Levine was saying was he was afraid Jeffery would murder Jimi in order to benefit from the policy…I interviewed people who were involved with Stickells right after Jimi died and they said that most of the industry people who they encountered at the time believed foul play was involved…
Another weak character attack by Buster the clown. He uses this same line against anybody who kicks his ass. Buster peddles outright bullshit where he says he out argues you. He is thin on actual evidence and heavy on total bullshit as always.
Oh boy, more phony “off camera” claims from this deranged wannabe “investigative reporter”.
Bob Levine was adamant there was no foul play involved. He gave two separate interviews making it very clear when he was in sound mind.
There isn’t one credible Hendrix insider or industry individual who believes there was foul play. Only the hangers-on made up bogus stories and they were exposed as liars and frauds. Buster is a liar and one of the frauds who pushes lies and fake information about Hendrix.
Even Buster’s hero, “disinformation queen” Sharon Lawrence, wrote in her fiction book Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 barbiturate tablets removing the bogus wine myth and the asinine foul play conspiracy. There can’t be foul play when Jimi knowingly and purposely swallowed 9 pills to kill himself based on numerology and the number 9 according to “best friend” and “close Hendrix insider” Sharon Lawrence.
More trolling denial from Jason…Jason sounds like Jim Hawthorn or Crosstown Torrents…Ten years ago they were saying none of Jimi’s close friends or associates believed Jimi was murdered…In the ten years worth of research I did since then I discovered that actually most of Jimi’s close friends or associates either directly believed there was foul play involved in Jimi’s death or showed obvious signs of covering it up…Jason lives in a delusional reality where his troll partner Ivana, who offers very weak made up on the spot material, and only found out about this subject when she decided to troll this thread, is “kicking my ass”…
I became friends with Bob Levine in his last years and knew him very well…After informing him of the facts of Jimi’s death he confided in me that everything he told McDermott was the truth…In my video interview with Bob in 2016 – that Jason seems to have forgotten – Bob said “I guess Jimi really was murdered…I always suspected Jeffery…I had no evidence, but I suspected Jeffery”…The Daily News and Joe Bosso somehow never made big headlines out of those statements from Bob…When Tappy told Bob it was all bullshit in order to sell a book he was probably just blowing off Bob because he didn’t want to reveal how much he really knew or how…Tappy told me what he didn’t tell Bob and it makes sense if you heard what I heard…In any case Tappy told me that he told Bob at the time and Bob said you better shut up and get back to New York…So Bob too was a negotiable entity when it came to what he knew and what he was willing to admit…
Sharon was covering-up when she wrote that…Jason lives in a simple one dimensional world where every statement made by every person must be exactly accurate all the time or the whole deal is off…But that is just the trick he uses for his trolling tactic…Jason would be laughed out of any court or detective bureau where people’s motives and sympathies can result in a vast disparity in describing the same event…What Sharon did do however was include some damningly important accurate information within the text of her disinformation…If it wasn’t for Sharon we wouldn’t have found out about Dr Thurston witnessing the wine…Or Monika having an incriminating catharsis when asked about the wine…Jason is a liar and sick denier…When Monika admitted she “washed sick off Jimi with wine” then there had to be wine and a wine smell on Jimi when the ambulance men got there…The same wine Dr Seifert and Bob Brown witnessed…The wine had to be real or Monika would not have reacted by moaning for 20 seconds and then making up a rather unbelievable excuse for wine she obviously knew was used to murder Jimi…
Who do you think you are fooling Jason?…
LMAO
Bob Levine never said that. You were trying to coerce Bob on video into saying “Jimi was murdered” in his nursing home when he was a very ill man and not in sound mind on his last legs. Even then, he never said Jimi was “murdered” and you upset him. Bob said the “murder” claims were ‘Bullshit’ on more than one occasion when he was in sound mind. Bob called out Tappy “the fraud” Wright and exposed his scam in the media. Every friend of Jimi Hendrix that was a musician say the “murder” claim is bullshit. Kathy Etchingham and Jimi’s sister Janie say those claims are bullshit too. The fake claims started after 1992 and Kathy’s investigation exposed those bogus claims to be a fraud.
Jimi had a full thorough autopsy and no signs of foul play were involved.
Thurston didn’t witness any wine cuz no wine was ever detected inside Jimi’s body and since Sharon claimed Jimi committed suicide that debunks her own bogus second hand claim of wine. That was another lie in her fiction book.
There wasn’t wine found at the flat or any smell of wine there. Neither ambulance man nor did the police ever speak of wine in their testimony. Dr. Bob Brown did not witness any wine either, he clearly stated Jimi Hendrix died of drug overdose from suffocating on vomit.
Are you freaking serious? You are saying “people don’t have to be right all the time” when making serious claims? Of course they do, if they aren’t right, then they are talking bullshit. So yes, the deal is off. You use any old fake claim for your hoax. That’s why you don’t care if the source is accurate as long as it fits your phony narrative.
We’ve been over this stuff for almost a year and I’ve debunked your lies each time with documented sources but you still post these same lies and then you add new ones along the way. I’ve kicked your ass from pillar to post and you have no real sources to ever back up your claims. All you do is say “somebody told me this and that” and add your own fake quotes to what people said. You’re a hoaxing troll and you never have real evidence to provide.
In a separate phone call where I explained the evidence for Jimi’s murder to Bob he said “I guess Jimi really was murdered, you should take your evidence to the FBI”…I first contacted Bob in 2011 and became friends with him in the last 5 years of his life…I visited his house 4 times before he went to the nursing home and Bob always said he appreciated my visits, counter to these two assholes trying to make it look like I was bothering him…I got video of him and Tappy together on one visit…Jason is a liar and you can see how quickly he tries to switch the conversation away from what Bob said in McDermott’s book and how it incriminated Jeffery in Jimi’s death…I’ve done more research on this than anyone on the planet and the reason both Bob and Tappy tried to disassociate themselves from it by saying it was bullshit was because they were trying to get away from explaining what they really knew and more importantly how they knew it…It is pretty obvious that Jason avoids all the rest of the qualifying evidence because he knows it disproves him…In my video with Bob Bob says he had suspicions, no proof, but suspicions…So there is a quote that shows Bob had an opinion that is quite contrary to the lies Jason tries to get away with right in front of those quotes…Bob’s real feelings are not that it was all bullshit, as Bob’s own spoken words, that Jason is in denial of in public, show…Jason is a sick troll and offers infantile denials like his saying every friend of Hendrix said it was bullshit…In my ten years of contacting those persons I discovered that most of Jimi’s friends and associates either directly thought Jeffery murdered Jimi or showed signs of an obvious cover-up…Both Juma Sultan and Jerry Velez both came out recently and openly pointed to Jeffery – yet this crazy scumbag Jason has the balls to post that none of Jimi’s friends believed it…He’s just in demented denial of reality and getting away with it due to the unmoderated nature of this page…
Thurston proved that the information about the wine was passed to the London Coroner’s office…Probably by Seifert because he was in charge…This is proof of a cover-up because it proves the Coroner’s Office committed malfeasance by failing to input that “large amount of red wine” in Jimi’s stomach in to the forensics…We now have reason to believe the Inquest acted with criminal intent by avoiding the doctor witnesses because of its knowledge of the wine…
Monika would not have moaned in to the telephone for 20 seconds unless she was being reminded of something very real and very painful…That 20 seconds of moaning that Sharon mentioned was the time it took for quick-footed Monika to think up the excuse that she used wine to wash vomit off of Jimi’s face…Using wine to wipe vomit is a ridiculous excuse because no one cleans another person’s face with wine…Not to mention the ambulance men described a scene where Jimi’s face was covered in vomit and un-wiped…If the wine wasn’t used for wiping what was it used for?…Jason refuses to own up to the fact that once the main witness admitted there was serious wine involved on or around Jimi’s face that the ambulance men had to smell and detect it like those at the hospital did…Monika reacted painfully and made up an unbelievable excuse because she was aware the wine was used to drown Jimi and needed to quickly get around it…Monika’s death soon followed…
Jason is scum and will say and do anything to deny Jimi’s murder…
You are really believing what Monika said. Funny how the expects failed to detect that poison in Jimi’s system that Monika talked about. Monika attempted to distance herself from any culpability in Jimi’s death by accusing various people. Noel Redding was not suggesting that Michael Jeffrey murdered Jimi he meant that he was the one who would benefit monetarily. Tappy was writing fiction and you’re doing the same. Jimi’s death was not a complex issue he died because he took to many of Monika’s Vesparax causing him to suffocate on his own vomit. The highly experienced Dr. Teare was very precise and accurate about his findings to the Coroner. Your posts Buster are becoming more and more laughable and full of nonsense; they are just empty verbose rants that mean absolutely nothing.
Hello Ivana,
Buster is a Hendrix fraud and a serial internet troll who pushes false tales along with harmful disinformation.
Buster has made very clear Monika is a pathological liar, but he uses her lies every chance he gets using her as his main witness for his phony “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax”.
This proves beyond a reasonable doubt that this fraud Buster will use any lie and false claim from discredited witnesses to push his agenda even after he calls his own main witness a pathological liar.
Buster is a hypocrite and a desperate fool who uses fake stories from discredited individuals where he invents his own phony caper of a “Hendrix murder”. It’s all fiction and fantasy from this nut and not a single ounce of truth.
Hi Jason, Buster is a nutter. Does he really think the experts missed a murder? Crosstown Torrents had the good sense to pull the plug on his fairytales and degenerate comments. All Buster amounts to is being an obnoxious serial internet troll who tries to infiltrate, influence and monopolise Hendrix sites with his lies. Fortunately he hasn’t succeeded anywhere.
Buster believes he is the “world’s top Jimi Hendrix expert” but everything he posts is an outright lie that’s easily debunked with facts. He is an annoying serial troll who hijacks any Hendrix site to spout off his ignorance.
Coroner’s officers went through the flat finding no signs of foul play. The world’s top medical experts Teare and Thurston found no evidence of foul play on Jimi’s body.
These guys were the best in the business and did autopsies for murder investigations and they determined there was no foul play for Jimi Hendrix.
Dr. Rufus Crompton read to Kathy Jimi’s autopsy report and said the 9 Vesparax was lethal to Jimi’s liver and he would have died anyway. The inhalation of vomit made him die quicker. Even Crompton said 4 or 5 Vesparax is enough to cause death. These guys were top medical experts. Buster and his many pseudonyms is nothing but a serial troll who gets banned from every site he spams with the same repetitive b.s. over and over again.
Alan Douglas produced two posthumous Hendrix albums Crash Landing and Midnight Lightning. Some have said that he was responsible for a resurgence of interest in the music of Jimi Hendrix while others criticised him for replacing the original musicians with unknown ones on these two albums. Apparently Jimi told Chas Chandler that he didn’t want Douglas to have anything to do with his music. Oddly these albums were not recorded at Electric Lady Studios.
Michael Jeffrey and Chas Chandler were responsible for turning Jimi into the global superstar that he eventually became. To then turn around and accuse one of them of murder is ludicrous and distasteful. Jimi said in a few interviews that he wanted to take some time off to study music properly as he could not read music. He may have been suffering from burn out as he was mainly responsible for writing most of the songs on his blockbuster albums, and touring endlessly. An off the cuff remark made to Christian Treiber has now been made into another stupid reason why Michael Jeffrey murdered Jimi. Buster is good at distorting and manipulating the facts/truth so it turns into tabloid and sensationalist muck. Buster’s limited knowledge of anything to do with Jimi Hendrix is confined to post 1990 to coincide with a trashy book written by Tappy Wright accusing Michael Jeffrey of murdering Jimi who just happened to be in Spain at the time. But we won’t let the truth get in the way of a good story. The author admitted he made the whole thing up in order to sell this dumb book but Buster just can’t let go of this simple fact regurgitating his nonsense over and over again anywhere he can. Nothing this stupid conspiracy theorist writes resembles what really happened to Jimi in anyway. If you see the name Buster,Flyswatter,Scrum Drum, Jet Blast, Albert Doyle remember you are reading fiction.
I skip over Buster’s comments.
Because you are a shallow troll with no working knowledge of the subject…My evidence more than proves murder…Which is why anyone looking to deal with this at an ignorant level like “April” can’t answer it…April thinks too much about Buster for someone whom she says she is skipping his comments…
Great move April. 😀
The inquest into Jimi’s death was not held before a jury as the coroner was satisfied as to what caused Jimi’s death. If there was any suspicion or reason of foul play involved then this would have been a trial with judge and jury. Kathy’s investigation of the 90’s reaffirmed and confirmed that Jimi died as a result of taking a lethal dose of Vesparax the only new thing that it uncovered was that there was a delay in calling the ambulance by several hours. This was apparent in the state of neglect Jimi was found in covered in dry vomit having died 5/6 hours earlier. The consensus among Hendrix fans was that this delay contributed to Jimi’s death as much as the nine Vesparax he took.
Hi Ivana,
Did you read this nonsense Buster wrote? It’s hilarious and once again he proves he’s just a serial troll. Imagine him thinking bogus information is o.k. to use in court.
BUSTER says: Jason lives in a simple one dimensional world where every statement made by every person must be exactly accurate all the time or the whole deal is off.
JASON says: Buster believes people can make inaccurate statements and call it facts. Using inaccurate statements makes that person wrong and not credible. That’s what Buster does with his hoax using lies and inaccurate information which is why he’s easily debunked. Every statement must be accurate doing research or It’s false. Buster doesn’t care if he is producing accurate information as long as it fits with his phony narrative. That’s why he used frauds as his sources and calls it facts. It’s a total joke and Buster is just pushing a hoax.
BUSTER ssys: But that is just the trick he uses for his trolling tactic…Jason would be laughed out of any court or detective bureau where people’s motives and sympathies can result in a vast disparity in describing the same event.
JASON says: I use documented sources and real facts for my evidence which is required for any court of bureau. That’s what they require. Buster uses hearsay and fake debunked conspiracy theories for his hoax. Not one single piece of real evidence does he ever produce that has real documentation.
Ivana, maybe Buster should take his so called “evidence” to the authorities since he’s the “world’s top Jimi Hendrix expert” and he can help them solve “Jimi’s case” looking for the “imaginary unkown murderer(s)” that Buster still refuses to name. LOL
Hi Jason, Buster’s accusing people of murder but near enough is good enough for him. What a joke. Imagine if he was called to give evidence in a murder trial he’d be laughed off the stand or better still prosecuted for perjury. Buster thinks he’s an expert but it’s obvious he’s nowhere near being that. No one shares that belief with him. He can never produce any real evidence because it just doesn’t exist for the basic fact that it’s all coming from his little warped mind. Buster told Bob Levine that he had “evidence” that the FBI would be interested in yet when I asked him to approach them so that Jimi’s death could be investigated at a cold case level I got a really short reply because this wasn’t evidence at all it was just a bunch of lies like everything else he’s posted here. We both stick to the facts because they’re real and true. No-one should ever be put off posting by someone like Buster.
Hi Ivana,
Buster is an “expert” in his own mind. It’s almost a year since I’ve been here and he repeats the same lies all the time. He is no Jimi Hendrix “expert”. All he does is read conspiracy theory books and invents his own tales of fiction claiming It’s “evidence”.
Bob Levine made perfectly clear, before he had serious health problems, that Jimi was not “murdered” and Tappy Wright’s phony Jeffery “murder” claim was “bullshit”. Bob said this more than once and a troll like Buster who never knew Jimi, Jeffery, or anybody closely associated with Jimi isn’t going to convince him by reciting garbage from Sharon Lawrence fiction books.
Even in Buster’s video, Bob never said a word about Jimi being “murdered”. But we
do get another “off camera” b.s. claim from serial hoaxer Buster where he claims Bob agreed it happened. It’s all total bunch of crap invented by Buster cuz he doesn’t have any real evidence to produce.
Anybody can say “so and so told me this” privately and that means he was “murdered”. It’s total crap and is not real documented evidence. That’s what Buster does and he is a serial troll. He definitely would be laughed out of court attempting that and be held in contempt for perjury. He has no “evidence” to take to the authorities since it’s lies made up by fraudsters Tappy Wright and Sharon Lawrence.
The facts are: St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from an overdose. Major newspapers confirmed it. Jimi’s autopsy confirmed he died from a lethal overdose. 20+ years later Dr. Rufus Crompton confirmed what we knew since 1970, that the 9 Vesparax was lethal to his liver, but the vomit he suffocated on killed him quicker. All of this is documented and is medical facts.
What does Buster have? Conspiracy theory claims from well known fraudsters, innuendos, hearsay, and his own fake invented stories where nothing is documented. Buster then attempts to discredit the real and factual documented evidence for his conspiracy theory crap. He still can’t produce evidence of his imaginary wine or name Jimi’s “murderer(s)” but he says he solved the case lol. Clearly he has mental issues still hoping somebody out there will listen to him. He’s laughed off of and banned from every website he’s ever posted on.
Hi Jason. Have you read Buster’s lasted offering? He has now dragged Juma Sultan and Jerry Velez into this. These two musicians played with Jimi at Woodstock and on a few songs. I have just finished reading Gary James’ interview with Juma Sultan where he talks about Jimi’s management no where does Juma accuse Michael Jeffrey of murder. There’s just one problem with Michael Jeffrey murdering Jimi HE WAS IN SPAIN.
Yeah, Ivana, I read it and had a good laugh.
Buster is still pathetically trying to throw anything at the wall hoping it will stick.
Buster uses the names of people and lies about what they said. He does this with Bob Levine, the ambulance men Reginal Jones and John Saua, Siefert, and with Dr. Bob Brown. Now he’s doing it with Sultan who never said anything about Jeffery “murdering” Jimi.
Buster lied about the ambulance men smelling and witnessing wine. Neither man talked about wine and Dr. Bob Brown never witnessed wine either. All their statements are recorded and they never mentioned the word wine…ever…..that proves there wasn’t wine at the flat or on Jimi. All 3 men said Jimi died from a drug overdose which is confirmed by the Hospital media statement, Jimi’s autopsy, and Dr. Rufus Crompton reading Jimi’s autopsy report to Kathy Etchingham. This is all real documented evidence of a drug overdose.
Now he’s back to “Monika moaning” again which comes from serial liar Sharon Lawrence. For an encore, we get Buster’s usual self invented cover up conspiracy theories with all the doctors being involved. It’s total nonsense and there is no evidence he can ever produce. It’s all fantasy and fiction.
Jeffery was in Spain and he wasn’t fired so that debunks Buster and his lies.
Jason is a sick creature from one of the more notorious Hendrix swamps like Crosstown Torrents where the moderators ban anyone who tries to tell the truth about Jimi’s murder…Jason is a scum who, because he only sources outdated internet material from websites that screen the evidence, is ignorant of the fact Juma came out several times and outright declared Jimi was murdered…You can judge this scummy little lying weasel and troll Jason by this one example alone and you can extrapolate it to the rest of his idiotic denials…Jason’s knowledge is retarded because he exists within those dark dens of denial like Crosstown Torrents where only deniers are allowed to be members…If you go to the 31:00 minute mark of the attached interview you will hear Juma openly insist to radio host Frank MacKay that Jimi’s death was a homicide and murder…Jason is just a demented scum who uses the infantile tactic of four year olds of turning your accusations against him right back at you in an infantile name-calling contest, but this example here shows who has the facts and knows what they are talking about…Juma is a personal friend of mine by the way…I just visited him in December…In this linked program Juma is referring to myself when he says “There are people writing books on it”… Also Jerry Velez is on You-Tube suggesting Jeffery had something to do with Jimi’s death…
Sharon Lawrence was there and was a direct witness…Jason is just an internet scum who is obviously nay-say trolling this thread…Jason uses the infantile method of four year olds when confronted by obvious evidence and calls Sharon a liar…It’s really Jason’s only option because otherwise her witnessing is so damning that any objective consideration of it leads to the inevitable conclusion of murder…For non-trolls who are reality-oriented Monika’s admission to Sharon that she poured wine on Jimi’s face to wash off vomit means that there was highly-detectable wine on Jimi at the Samarkand…Jason keeps running and hiding behind his obviously desperate weak excuses that are mostly based on ripping things of out context, forced contrivance, and semantics, but anyone with common sense could see where the evidence is going…Sharon isn’t lying – Jason is…That phone call Monika made to Sharon is real…In my investigation I found out Monika was reaching out and contacting many Hendrix people at the time trying to do a PR campaign to get back in to their good graces…Sharon was one of them…The phone call is real and Sharon isn’t lying…In that call Monika admitted the wine and made up a flimsy excuse to get around what she was aware it was really used for…That’s why Monika moaned in pain when asked about the wine…It is because it brought back the memory of Jimi being murdered with it…A question Monika had avoided for decades and wasn’t expecting…
I think I’m going to go back in to hibernation mode and stop feeding these two asshole trolls Jason and Ivana…There’s no point in entertaining two obvious denial trolls that Justin doesn’t have the sense to ban:
Funny how Buster uses these unknown acquaintances of Jimi Hendrix as his so called evidence. Juma and Jerry Velez were not there to know what happened and they are just making 50 year old after the fact accusations. Anybody can make baseless claims and that’s all Buster and these scammers have trying to still make money off Jimi with bogus conspiracy books.
Buster says: Jason is a sick creature from one of the more notorious Hendrix swamps like Crosstown Torrents where the moderators ban anyone who tries to tell the truth about Jimi’s murder…
JASON says: There was never a “Hendrix murder” and there is no truth to it. I’ve debunked all your lies and bogus claims that you thought were clever enough to win a “debate”. You’re banned from every website on the internet cuz you’re a troll who needs mental help.
BUSTER says: Jason is a scum who, because he only sources outdated internet material from websites that screen the evidence, is ignorant of the fact Juma came out several times and outright declared Jimi was murdered…
JASON says: LOL. Outdated internet material? Like I’ve told you before, real life events and actions are never outdated, they are part of history that actually happened. Jimi’s 0.7 lethal barbiturate reading is not outdated, it’s a medical fact and a real life event. Expert witness testimony is not outdated cuz it confirms the real life event. You don’t have any real events or medical facts cuz you make up phony and ridiculous stories.
Who cares what Juma declared. He wasn’t there the morning Jimi died, he wasn’t at the hospital, he wasn’t there during the autopsy. He is hearing phony stories like you are being dumb enough to believe them. He wasn’t anywhere near Jimi Hendrix in 1970. So again, you bring out some irrelevant acquaintance making a bogus claim as your “evidence”. 0.7 lethal barbiturate reading ends that. Also, the police, Teare, and Thurston, saw no signs of a “murder”.
BUSTER says: You can judge this scummy little lying weasel and troll Jason by this one example alone and you can extrapolate it to the rest of his idiotic denials…Jason’s knowledge is retarded because he exists within those dark dens of denial like Crosstown Torrents where only deniers are allowed to be members…If you go to the 31:00 minute mark of the attached interview you will hear Juma openly insist to radio host Frank MacKay that Jimi’s death was a homicide and murder…Jason is just a demented scum who uses the infantile tactic of four year olds of turning your accusations against him right back at you in an infantile name-calling contest, but this example here shows who has the facts and knows what they are talking about…Juma is a personal friend of mine by the way…I just visited him in December…In this linked program Juma is referring to myself when he says “There are people writing books on it”… Also Jerry Velez is on You-Tube suggesting Jeffery had something to do with Jimi’s death…
JASON says: Of course people are writing books, they want to make money off Jimi Hendrix with a 50 year old phony murder scam like you are doing. That’s the whole point of this hoax. You are a hangers-on of old Hendrix acquaintances running a scam. Like I said, Juma can insist all he wants. He can never refute Jimi’s 0.7 lethal barbiturate reading and claim a phony wine drowning where no wine was found. People can suggest anything, that doesn’t mean that it’s true. So, you offer no evidence except two acquaintances of Jimi Hendrix who are making 50 year old after the fact “murder” accusations and suggestions with no solid evidence. That’s a fail.
BUSTER says: Sharon Lawrence was there and was a direct witness…Jason is just an internet scum who is obviously nay-say trolling this thread…Jason uses the infantile method of four year olds when confronted by obvious evidence and calls Sharon a liar…It’s really Jason’s only option because otherwise her witnessing is so damning that any objective consideration of it leads to the inevitable conclusion of murder…
JASON says: LMAO. Sharon Lawrence was not “there” at the Samarkand when Jimi died and she was not a “direct witness” to anything. Buster is just lying through his rotten teeth. Really pathetic the depths Buster will go to lie when it’s so blatant. Sharon Lawrence said in her fiction book that Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills so how can you claim it “leads to the inevitable conclusion of murder”? You are all over the place using contradictions for your phony hoax. Sharon says suicide and you’re claiming “murder”. It can’t be both and both claims are wrong cuz Jimi died an accidental overdose death.
BUSTER says: For non-trolls who are reality-oriented Monika’s admission to Sharon that she poured wine on Jimi’s face to wash off vomit means that there was highly-detectable wine on Jimi at the Samarkand…Jason keeps running and hiding behind his obviously desperate weak excuses that are mostly based on ripping things of out context, forced contrivance, and semantics, but anyone with common sense could see where the evidence is going…Sharon isn’t lying – Jason is…That phone call Monika made to Sharon is real…In my investigation I found out Monika was reaching out and contacting many Hendrix people at the time trying to do a PR campaign to get back in to their good graces…Sharon was one of them…The phone call is real and Sharon isn’t lying…In that call Monika admitted the wine and made up a flimsy excuse to get around what she was aware it was really used for…That’s why Monika moaned in pain when asked about the wine…It is because it brought back the memory of Jimi being murdered with it…A question Monika had avoided for decades and wasn’t expecting…
JASON says: If this so called wine was so “highly detectable” then why didn’t the ambulance men, the police, or Dr. Bob Brown detect it on Jimi? All ridiculous nonsense from Buster. Sharon did lie. She wrote in her crappy book, Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills being obsessed with the number 9 and the occult. That’s a damn lie. Not one close friend of Jimi Hendrix ever said he was in the occult. Dr. Thurston determined Jimi did not commit suicide at the inquest. So yes Buster, Sharon is lying in her bogus Hendrix fiction book. And since she says drugs killed Jimi, you can’t claim wine cuz that makes wine irrelevant. This is a total contradiction two different phony Jimi Hendrix deaths. This is why your hoax is an absolute joke, it makes no sense using two opposite claims of a drug suicide and a phony “wine drowning” where no wine was ever detected at the flat.
BUSTER says: I think I’m going to go back in to hibernation mode.
JASON says: Enjoy your hibernation! Let me know if you find any imaginary wine or documents of phony procedures written out by Fraud Bannister.
There is just one major problem with this drowning by wine is that Jimi died as a result of taking too many of Monika’s prescription Vesparax causing him to choke on his own vomit. The wine did not cause his death the medication did. This supposed wine would have caused bruising to the throat and esophagus if it was forced into Jimi but Dr.Teare found no evidence of violence during the autopsy. Dr. Teare did not find any traces of wine around Jimi’s body if he had he would have made mention of its presence in his report as having contributed to Jimi’s death as much as the Vesparax. The autopsy report clearly states that Jimi’s death was caused by inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication.
More phony claims of “wine” and still not one of these fraudsters ever has evidence to prove their claim.
Both ambulance gave testimony during Kathy’s investigation. Neither man discussed wine or even brought it up. If there was this incredible scene of a “wine drowning”, the evidence of “wine” would have been the first thing both men would have mentioned. The fact that neither man talked about wine and both confirmed it was drugs, proves there wasn’t a “wine drowning” cuz they did not see it. A “wine drowning” would be obvious.
Also, Officer Smith was interviewed and he did not witness wine. He said it was a routine drug overdose. Coroner officers combed the flat taking pills and blankets as evidence. They did not see any wine. Forensic analysis of the blankets turned up that it was barbiturates. Where is all this so called wine from a “massive wine drowning”? Nowhere to be found. Wine did not exist.
St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from an overdose of drugs. They never stated anything about wine or alcohol in their media press conference. Again, that proves no wine existed.
Finally, we have Jimi’s autopsy where Dr. Teare did a full body forensic analysis of Jimi’s body. Teare looked at the lining of Jimi’s stomach. No enormous amounts of wine was found absorbed in the issues. Teare examined Jimi’s lungs. Again, no evidence of enormous amounts of wine either. He also examined his throat. Once again, no evidence of enormous amounts of wine in the tissues there either. If Jimi was drowned in all this wine, the tissues would have absorbed wine and it would have been detected during the autopsy. No wine was ever detected inside Jimi cuz there never was any wine. The fake wine claims didn’t start until January of 1992 with Fraud Bannister. Teare found vomit in Jimi’s bronchi and rice in his stomach and all the evidence left behind proves it was an overdose of drugs. I’ve already provided evidence of what Teare discovered and it exactly matches of what happens to a drug overdose victim.
Tappy “the fraud” Wright made up the bogus story of Jeffery stuffing pills in Jimi’s mouth and pouring bottles of wine down Jimi’s throat. Bob Levine exposed Wright’s lie in the media and Wright admitted he made the whole thing up to sell copies of his useless book. After that, other fraudsters like Buster tried to still peddle this bogus wine conspiracy.
Not a single shred of documented medical evidence shows wine and Kathy Etchingham who did the investigation confirmed in her book that Jimi died from a lethal drug overdose when Dr. Rufus Crompton read to her the results of Jimi’s lethal barbiturate level.
Hi Jason, That story about Monika moaning into the telephone to Sharon Lawrence is highly unlikely mainly because Monika would have been admitting to killing Jimi with the wine. She told the German reporter she gave Jimi her sleeping pills and then spent the rest of her life accusing others trying to distance herself from any blame. Monika also spent a lot of time in litigation with various publishers and authors who she felt portrayed her in a negative light.
Nobody liked Monika, and rightly so, cuz she didn’t do anything to help Jimi when he was struggling to breathe with the overdose. Lawrence particularly didn’t like her as a person, so she printed all these claims in her book that doesn’t add up as she ends up contradicting herself.
Sharon wrote that Jimi committed suicide by taking by taking 9 pills. Then to sensationalize her phony story, she made up a bunch of nonsense of Jimi taking part in the occult and being fascinated with numerology and the number 9. Nobody else who was close to Jimi ever mentioned any of this, so we know Sharon made this junk up for the readers.
The fact that Sharon wrote Jimi killed himself, contradicts her Monika’s wine claims. Jimi was already dead by taking his own life, according to Sharon, so what would be the point of Monika and the wine? Jimi was already dead. No need for wine. That’s a terrible contradiction that debunks her own claims. Jimi can’t die two different deaths with both a suicide and then a “wine drowning”. That’s impossible. The readers are nodding their heads in agreement.
And we know both ambulance men never witnessed red wine on the bed or on Jimi’s body. The police didn’t see any either. The coroner’s officers that did the investigation in the room saw no wine. Neither did the cleaning crew that cleaned up the room. All these people witnessed the death scene on 9-18-70 and not one of them witnessed all this wine that these hoaxers try to say was there in gallons.
So, that proves Sharon’s 30 year stories of Monika and wine were bogus since wine wasn’t witnessed at the death scene. And who would “moan” into a phone for all that time? Just more made up nonsense and Buster is desperate to use anything for his hoax. What Sharon claimed in her fiction book is not real documented evidence, It’s only baseless claims like all the others she made up.
Hey Ivana,
Have you seen Buster’s latest outrageous lie? This one is monumental.
BUSTER says: Sharon Lawrence was there and was a direct witness.
JASON says: Is this guy on drugs? Buster is now saying that Sharon Lawrence was at the flat the morning Jimi died and witnessed everything. We know Buster is a hoaxing troll but this brings hoaxing to a whole new level. Sharon Lawrence was never at the flat and she made up her own outrageous lies for her Jimi Hendrix fiction book 30 years later.
Sharon Lawrence doesn’t have any evidence for any of her claims about Monika “moaning” or any of the garbage she cooks up for her disinformation book. Sharon said that Jimi was born at a family friend’s house, made up fake quotes and stories about Jimi’s mother before she passed away, made up the bogus Thurston second hand quote, said Jimi committed suicide by taking 9 pills based on numerology and the occult with the number 9. All of these stories are nothing but fiction and Buster believes all this crap and uses it for his hoax. These are all outlandish claims by Lawrence in order to sell a book and not a single thing is true. I’m surprised the Hendrix Estate didn’t sue her for defamation against Jimi Hendrix.
Fraudster Sharon Lawrence even tried to auction off decades old empty cigarette packs from the late 60’s claiming they belonged to Jimi Hendrix just so she could make money off his name. What kind of “close friend” would do that? This woman also committed perjury in court, so we know that she has no problem with lying anywhere, even under oath, she makes up fake stories.
BUSTER says: Juma openly insist to radio host Frank MacKay that Jimi’s death was a homicide and murder…Jason is just a demented scum who uses the infantile tactic of four year olds of turning your accusations against him right back at you in an infantile name-calling contest, but this example here shows who has the facts and knows what they are talking about…Juma is a personal friend of mine by the way…I just visited him in December…In this linked program Juma is referring to myself when he says “There are people writing books on it”… Also Jerry Velez is on You-Tube suggesting Jeffery had something to do with Jimi’s death…
JASON says: Here’s another individual Buster claims he’s a “personal friend” of. It seems Buster wants to be a hangers-on of only acquaintances of Jimi Hendrix from 50 years ago.
Juma was not a witness to Jimi’s death scene and both ambulance men and the police who were interviewed never stated anything about witnessing a “homicide” or “murder”. All three men confirmed Hendrix died from an overdose. That is an official confirmation from professionals who witnessed the scene. The Hospital confirmed a drug overdose as did the autopsy report and Dr. Crompton. The news reports from 9-18-70 have police stating that they suspected an overdose as well. It clearly stated that “no foul play was involved.”
Yeah, they are writing books to make money off Jimi Hendrix’s name making up bogus “murder” claims with no proof. These people are just fraudsters out to make a quick buck. None of these people went to the authorities with their “stories” did they? Instead they used their outrageous stories as a ‘hook” for their boring book, otherwise nobody would even buy it. In fact, Jimi Hendrix isn’t the main part of the book. They use his name with a fake claim for their “hook” as incentive for people to buy it. These people are shameful and just use Jimi to make money.
We all saw what happened to Tappy Wright when he made up his bogus claim about “Jeffery killing Hendrix”. Bob Levine immediately called him out in the media exposing his phony “murder scam”. Wright admitted to Levine that he made up the whole thing for his book. That’s the same exact thing these other fraudsters are doing. Wright made up his fake claim and the others are following suit.
Jerry Velez is only “suggesting” without any evidence cuz none exists. Again, this is all rumors, hearsay, innuendos. Tappy Wright tried this a decade ago and was exposed as a fraud. Since he had no evidence of anything, these other jokers have nothing either.
Anybody can claim 50 years later “I think Jimi was murdered” and offer nothing but rumors. The autopsy report confirms Jimi died of a drug overdose and the hospital officials confirmed it on day Jimi died. Not one of these jokers have any real proof to dispute the official record except “stories” that magically came to their mind decades later. Not one of these people told their “stories” when Jimi died or went to the police. It’s all a scam folks, and I’m pretty sure Buster the Clown is trying to make money off this scam too.
BUSTER says: I think I’m going back in to hibernation mode
JASON says: Buster is scampering away again cuz he can’t defend his lies and hoax. All he has are fake stories from Sharon Lawrence and Hendrix acquaintances who want to make money off Jimi’s name. These people have no evidence except outrageous stories and Buster is peddling this nonsense. Jimi’s autopsy report, the documented testimony of the ambulance men and the police, Dr. Crompton’s reading of the autopsy report to Kathy, and St. Mary Abbotts media press conference confirming Jimi’s drug overdose will forever debunks these fake stories made up by these fraudsters.
Michael Goldstein warned back in 1970, a few days after Jimi died, that fraudsters would make up fake stories to make money off Jimi and Kathy Etchingham alluded to the same 20+ years later. Kathy did an investigation and said all these murder claims by these clowns coming out of the woodwork is bullshit. The late Bob Levine already made that perfectly clear a decade ago in the media after he exposed Tappy Wright as a fraud.
Have fun hibernating Buster.
Spot on, Jason. Juma appeared in the Warner’s Bros documentary of the early 70’s but he never said anything about murder back then the same for the Aleem twins. All three have decided to jump onto the conspiracy theory bandwagon decades later. I suggest they read Dr. Teare’s report or Kathy’s monumental one if people want to know what really happened to Jimi on 18th September 1970.
Hi Ivana,
These people making “murder” claims are irrelevant and they think if they come up with a “story” they can be relevant. I mean who cared to read what Tappy Wright had to say. He was basically a nobody that was just a roadie. He made up that fake Michael Jeffery story to sell a book. Same with Aleem and the other few fraudsters trying to make money off Jimi.
They weren’t talking “murder” in 1970 but only decades later when conspiracies started and they needed money.
Kathy Etchingham did a real investigation to find out what really happened to Jimi. None of these other people had access to medical documents, autopsy reports, business contracts or interviewed people who saw the death scene. They are making up stories and rumors while Kathy did the hard work to find the truth. Everything she turned up for evidence debunks all these fraudsters claims and “stories”.
Kathy said it the best: “The reality is, Jimi had taken 18 times the normal dose of barbiturate, along with the alcohol equivalent of eight beers. So the next time someone tells you he didn’t die of a drug overdose…of course he did! The pathologist said that even if he hadn’t vomited, he would have died anyway. He would have stopped breathing eventually, unless an ambulance had been called much earlier on. The thing is, Jimi didn’t know what he was taking. He couldn’t read a label in German. He would have trusted…whoever” – Kathy Etchingham
Bob Levine Speaks Out
“Jimi Hendrix was not murdered,” says Bob Levine, who was the US manager of the late guitarist at the time of his death in 1970. “Despite the allegations that have recently been made, I need to set the record straight once and for all. Jimi died an accidental death, but he definitely wasn’t murdered – not by Michael Jeffery, his UK manager, and certainly not by anybody connected to him. The whole thing is one giant lie.”
The crooks who went to Bob for that quote were only interested in hearing that quote and didn’t probe any deeper like honest journalism requires…And Bob was just interested in getting rid of them and the whole subject by telling them what they wanted to hear…I’ve studied this issue more intensely and up close than anyone and I can tell you Bob and Tappy were people who would make blow-off statements like those Jason’s quotes in order to avoid their true doings…Tappy was the type who would say it was all bullshit in order to avoid fessing-up to how he really learned about it…Anyone with any common sense would realize Tappy was close to Jeffery, and Jeffery chose him to do the post-death Hendrix film tour, because Jeffery knew he could trust Tappy with his darkest secrets…
What Jason uses out of context quotes to get around is the fact any credible journalist would have asked Levine about his comments in McDermott’s ‘Setting The Record Straight’ in 1990…Those comments were Bob’s first statements on the issue and were 20 years after Jimi’s death…In that book Bob makes it clear he warned Jimi not to sign any insurance policy with Jeffery as the beneficiary…The only reason a person would warn another not to sign a policy (especially Jeffery with his personal profile of torching businesses that were failing for the insurance) is because they were worried the policy owner would murder Jimi in order to collect…Jason is dishonest because he ignores that that was clearly the context of Levine’s quote…Bosso, The Daily News, and Glebbeek might wish their Levine quote was the last word but anyone can see they deliberately avoided the real evidence in their approach and didn’t honestly seek all the information…I have another video where Bob says “Everything I said in McDermott is true”…What Bob was saying there was he was incriminating Jeffery in Jimi’s murder in McDermott…That was the necessary journalism those others failed to do…Do the correct journalism and you get the correct results…
Jason is dishonest because once Bob had all the evidence run by him in its proper context you can see in my interview that Bob’s real feelings towards the issue are that he had his suspicions about Jeffery murdering Jimi but didn’t have any proof…What you don’t see in my interview is a separate phone call with Bob that I had where he said “I guess Jimi really was murdered…You should bring your evidence to the FBI”…Jason quotes the blow-off quote but he ignores that Bob’s original and final statements both pointed towards Jeffery murdering Jimi…Both Bosso and Glebbeek never strained Levine by asking him about that…
Jason is scum…He’s just an internet hooligan who is going to turn any obvious proof you produce against you with demented trolling…It really is Justin’s fault that Jason is allowed to get away with what he posts…Jason should not be allowed to post amongst honorable, honest Hendrix people…
Buster is full of crap as usual trying to discredit real documented evidence. All Buster does is whine with his own bogus alternative version of fantasy.
How much more explicit does Bob Levine have to be? Bob clearly said “Jimi’s death was accidental and Jimi was not murdered by Jeffery or anyone associated with him.”
This is coming from Jimi’s former U.S. manager who knew Jeffery and the entire management. Levine said it never happened. He was 100% positive Jimi was not “murdered” when he addressed the media. Buster is frantically trying to explain away saying “this is what he really meant” but we all can read what Bob said, “Jimi was not murdered.” Bob already had all the facts and knowledge then. Tappy Wright was a liar and made up a bogus claim about Jeffery killing Hendrix to sell his useless book and Bob Levine exposed that lie to the media.
Bob Levine set the record straight when he was in sound mind and in better health. He wouldn’t have informed the media if he wasn’t 100% positive.
Buster is lying again pushing bogus debunked conspiracy theories like an imaginary “insurance policy” on Jimi for his debunked hoax.
Bob Levine debunks Buster’s bogus conspiracy theory right here:
Bob Levine: “Tappy wrote that Jeffrey was afraid that Jimi was going to leave him for a new manager,” says Levine. “He also said that Jeffrey had taken out an insurance policy on Jimi that was worth a couple of million dollars and that he wanted to collect on it.”
“All of which is ridiculous,” says Levine. “I was Jimi’s US manager, and Michael Jeffrey was Jimi’s UK manager. Michael also oversaw a lot in the US, but he was involved in other business enterprises. Michael wasn’t always Jimi’s manager – Chas Chandler, who was in The Animals, was managing and producing Jimi at first. The three of us, in fact – myself, Chas and Michael Jeffrey — all saw Jimi together in 1966 at the Café Wha in New York City. You could tell he was going to be a huge star even then.”
Well, there you have it folks, Buster the Clown got busted again peddling more lies for his “Hendrix murder hoax” as Bob Levine exposes him from the grave for being a fraud.
You should know by now Buster, that all your bogus conspiracy theories
will always be debunked with factual documented evidence. The late Bob Levine
debunked your lies.
Buster is nothing but a hoaxing lying fraud who is not honest or honorable in the Hendrix community. Buster is a decade long serial troll who is a pariah in the Hendrix community. He is banned from every website he posts on for serial trolling. Buster is not a “researcher”, he is a clown pushing a scam. He’s been exposed again folks.
That’s stupid Jason…It’s not even good trolling…Jason is so full of sloppy denial and demented trolling that he fails to realize his own evidence backs my case…Here is what Jason offers as refutation:
~ ~ ~ Bob Levine: “Tappy wrote that Jeffrey was afraid that Jimi was going to leave him for a new manager,” says Levine. “He also said that Jeffrey had taken out an insurance policy on Jimi that was worth a couple of million dollars and that he wanted to collect on it.”
“All of which is ridiculous,” says Levine. “I was Jimi’s US manager, and Michael Jeffrey was Jimi’s UK manager. Michael also oversaw a lot in the US, but he was involved in other business enterprises. Michael wasn’t always Jimi’s manager – Chas Chandler, who was in The Animals, was managing and producing Jimi at first. The three of us, in fact – myself, Chas and Michael Jeffrey — all saw Jimi together in 1966 at the Café Wha in New York City. You could tell he was going to be a huge star even then.” ~ ~ ~
Whoever did that interview, whether it was Bosso or the Daily News, the reporter failed to ask Bob about his comment in McDermott that Jimi came to him in Hawaii with a personal insurance policy from Jeffery where Jeffery was the beneficiary…Bob commented in McDermott’s ‘Setting The Record Straight’ that he had a bad feeling about that policy and warned Jimi not to sign it…Jason dodges the fact that friends of Jeffery’s in England said he burned down his failing nightclub in order to use the money to establish another…So Jeffery had an important FBI-type personal profile of burning down failing business…And Jimi was definitely a failing business at that point (as far as Jeffery was concerned)…No responsible journalist would fail to ask Bob why he was grossly contradicting himself over what he wrote in ‘Setting The Record Straight’…
In any case Jason is just trollishly ignoring that when Bob was briefed with the complete evidence and asked the correct questions in their right context – which Bosso, the Daily News, and Glebbeek all failed to do, he came forth and openly admitted that Jeffery was involved in Jimi’s death…5 months before his death Bob Levine came forward with the truth and admitted Jeffery had something to do with Jimi’s death…It’s right there in my video…When Bob’s memory was fresh in 1990 McDermott was the first person to approach him on his Jimi history and Bob volunteered without any prompting that he warned Jimi about signing a personal insurance policy with Jeffery out of the fear that Jeffery might murder him to collect…In another video I did with Bob he told me “Everything I said in McDermott was true”…The context of that is obvious…And it includes the personal insurance policy…
These Crosstown denier scum like Jason should be driven off the internet…I’ll try to find out who he is so I can possibly pursue future legal action against him…
LMAO “possibly pursue future legal action against me.”
Legal action needs to be brought against Buster the clown for running his decade long scam accusing people of murder and famous doctors of instigating a “criminal cover up” that never happened.
What’s stupid is, Buster is still repeating the same bogus Hendrix conspiracy theories after I just debunked his scam again. There was no “Hendrix insurance policy with Jeffery as the beneficiary”. Levine said it was bogus in his interviews. I believe Kathy Etchingham also confirmed that as well. This is a bogus made up conspiracy that Buster uses for his hoax.
Bob didn’t need to be “briefed” with anything cuz he already knew everything since he was Jimi’s U.S. manager. Bob’s mind was still fresh when he called out Tappy “The Fraud” Wright’s lies in the media setting the record straight. This is documented evidence and Buster only has his debunked conspiracy theories and his own made up fake stories cuz he is a hoaxing serial troll who’s banned from every website he posts on.
Bob Levine made perfectly clear that Jimi was not murdered. Bob confirmed Michael Jeffery had nothing to do with Jimi’s death. Bob also confirmed there wasn’t an insurance policy on Jimi with Jeffery as the beneficiary. Bob also said Jimi’s death was accidental. Bob said Tappy “The Fraud” Wright is a hoaxer. Buster is full of shit, as he frantically tries to explain away bogus conspiracy theories which he cannot counter with real documented evidence. Buster’s bogus “Hendrix Murder Hoax” blew up in his face again as Buster peddles the lies of one Tappy “The Fraud” Wright.
Take it away again Bob!
BOB LEVINE: “Jimi Hendrix was not murdered,” says Bob Levine, who was the US manager of the late guitarist at the time of his death in 1970. “Despite the allegations that have recently been made, I need to set the record straight once and for all. Jimi died an accidental death, but he definitely wasn’t murdered – not by Michael Jeffrey, his UK manager, and certainly not by anybody connected to him. The whole thing is one giant lie.”
BOB LEVINE: “Tappy wrote that Jeffrey was afraid that Jimi was going to leave him for a new manager,” says Levine. “He also said that Jeffrey had taken out an insurance policy on Jimi that was worth a couple of million dollars and that he wanted to collect on it. All of which is ridiculous,” says Levine.
“Jimi Hendrix died by accident. He was a happy guy, looking forward to making music. And Michael Jeffrey didn’t have it out for Jimi in any way. I talked to him the day before Jimi died. He had major plans for Jimi. The future was very bright at the time. The whole thing about Michael taking out a life insurance policy and wanting to collect? That’s in Tappy’s imagination, too.”
BOB LEVINE: Regarding Wright’s claim that Jeffrey murdered his star client, Levine says it was all cooked up to sell books. “I used to talk to Tappy every day,” says Levine. “I’ve known him since the early ’60s. He told me he was putting together a book about his years in the rock world. That’s fine – everybody has a right to do a book if they can. But he told me, ‘Bob, I need a hook for the book. I need a handle.’ He needed something that would be a grabber. Well, saying that Jimi was murdered is a grabber; saying that Jimi was murdered by his manager is an even bigger grabber. But it’s certainly not the truth.”
BOB LEVINE: “He was with a girl who did give him some sleeping pills – Jimi always had a hard time sleeping, so he’d take pills to make him sleep. He had some wine, too, and went to sleep. But when it came time for the wine to come up – he had to vomit – he was literally knocked out by the pills, so he choked on his vomit.”
BOB LEVINE: “People weren’t very good at keeping such records at the time,” says Levine. “The actual death certificate from Scotland Yard read: ‘Accidental Suffocation.’ That was signed by the medical examiner.
All of which makes Wright’s assertions, in Levine’s words, “pure baloney. He says that he called the retired medical examiner in Australia, who told him that Jimi didn’t die accidentally, that it was a result of ‘foul play.’ Now, come on, that’s right out of a Stephen King novel or something. An 80-year-old medical examiner suddenly changes his mind after 40 years and tells some guy who’s writing a rock star tell-all something like that? Totally ridiculous.”
JASON says: Well folks, there you have it, “totally ridiculous” says Bob Levine. Just the facts ma’am.
Bob Levine demolished every single one of Buster The Clown’s aka Brian Doyle’s bogus conspiracy theories that were all made up by Tappy “The Fraud” Wright in order to sell his crappy book. Not one thing Buster spouts off is true. Levine shot it all down.
Bob Levine agrees with Ivana and myself, also anybody with common sense, can see these bogus conspiracy theories are just a fraudulent scam. These fake “murder” claims have no merit and they don’t have documented evidence. Just fake stories and rumors to sell phony books for money.
Bob has confirmed everything that I’ve been posting to be accurate. Bob also confirmed the official record and everything that Kathy Etchingham had investigated.
So, we have two people close to Jimi Hendrix who confirm that Jimi was not murdered, his death was accidental, Michael Jeffery had no involvement in Jimi’s death, there was no insurance policy by Jeffery on Jimi, all these conspiracy theories that Tappy Wright cooked up are full of shit, and so is Fraud Bannister’s bogus claims of wine.
Jimi’s US manger, Bob Levine debunked Buster the Clown, and so did Kathy Etchingham, Jimi’s ex girlfriend who investigated Jimi’s death. They both agree with the official record and that Buster is full of shit. Buster is a serial internet troll and he’s banned from every website for pushing his fake Hendrix murder scam.
Well folks, Bob Levine demolished the bullshit Buster peddles. Bless you Bob!
The more you nail Jason with the facts the more bullshit he has to work up in order to compensate…You can tell when you’ve really nailed Jason by the length of his replies…The longer the reply the more Jason is obviously working to deny what he knows to be true…
Jason is stupid because not only does the increasingly crude level of trolling he offers when nailed clue the reader but he also misses the obvious flaws in what he is presenting…It never dawns on Jason that, in his blow-off comment, where Bob says there was no personal insurance policy Jeffery wanted Jimi to sign, that Bob himself clearly detailed in ‘Setting The Record Straight’ that Jimi came to him in Hawaii in 1970 with a personal insurance policy from Jeffery and asked him if he should sign it…Jason stupidly fails to realize that it was the fact that it was a suspicious personal policy, that spurred Jimi to ask Bob about it, that is what caused Bob to warn Jimi not to sign it…Jason is so engrossed in his trolling zeal to deny that he doesn’t stop to consider that if it was a nominal artist’s policy for Warner Brothers that Bob would not have warned Jimi about it and Jimi would not have gone to Bob to ask him about it in the first place…Jason also dishonestly ignores that the Warner’s contracts were written up long before 1970 in like 1968 or so…This shows a good example of what the degenerate scum like Jim Hawthorn offer at Crosstown Torrents…In Jason’s lengthy diversionary trolling he fails to answer why Bob would say in ‘Setting The Record Straight’ that he had a bad feeling about a nominal artist’s policy for Warner’s?…
It is all part of Jason’s gas-lighting routine to reverse the evidence and accuse us of what he is guilty of…Jason is lying here when he quotes that simple-minded shit saying Bannister reversed himself after 40 years…As we have already proven, Bannister never reversed himself on anything he said…Bannister’s story was always the same from day one and never changed one iota…Actually it was Dr Seifert who was caught red-handed telling diametrically-opposing stories…Any fool could see the more Jason becomes aware of the correct evidence the more stupid and more desperate he gets…If he thinks people don’t see this he is crazy…He’s obviously been backed in to moronic trolling by my good evidence he couldn’t credibly answer…He’s trolling and shouldn’t be allowed to get away with it…
Buster the serial troll is at it again.
Bob Levine didn’t make any “blow off comments”. Bob specifically went to the press to expose the lies of Tappy “The Fraud” Wright. Everything Bob Levine stated is accurate and documented. What we get from Buster is his own bullshit version of spinning a bogus story. He’s repeating phony conspiracy theories that have been debunked. We’ve read what Bob Levine told the press and this clown Buster is still trying to push his dead hoax.
Bob Levine confirmed that Jimi was not murdered by Michael Jeffery or anyone associated with him. Levine also said there was never any insurance policy on Jimi made by Jeffery. This was also confirmed by Kathy Etchingham. Levine also said that Jimi’s death was accidental and Kathy Etchingham published the same facts in her book. So, two legitimate sources totally debunk Buster the Clown and this serial troll is still typing out fake debunked conspiracy theories.
Of course Fraud Bannister reversed himself. In 1970, Bannister confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from an drug overdose. St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed that to the media in their media press conference that Jimi Hendrix died from an overdose.
Fraud Bannister was the doctor who had to sign off on that for that confirmation to be made public since he was the one who signed Jimi’s death certificate. As Bob Levine astutely pointed out, Jimi’s death certificate read ‘accidental suffocation’. There was nothing printed about fake and phony imaginary wine on Jimi’s death certificate. The fake “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax” was proven to be a dud once again.
Buster’s is using useless bullshit trolling excuses cuz his hoax was exposed again. He is narrating his own phony version of events with no documented evidence. He is projecting as well as he is gaslighting this entire charade.
I posted documented facts and Buster did not. Levine is on record demolishing every phony claim Buster has made. And if you read Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”, she corroborates everything Bob Levine stated in his interviews to the press. Real facts demolish crap conspiracy theories from serial troll Buster pushing a dead hoax for over a decade.
Bob did not go to the press…The press came to him…Bob was legally blind so Jason’s lies are once again easily exposed…They came to him in reaction to Tappy’s book…
The problem Jason can’t overcome is out here in the real world where crooked moderators can’t ban you when you start gaining the advantage, Jason’s shit doesn’t fly and he can’t get away with that booby trolling he offers…I own this turf and I am in charge out here…
If you look at Jason’s response he’s struggling and trying to blather around the point that when Bob first spoke about the subject in 1990 to McDermott he very specifically said that Jimi came to him with a personal insurance policy that Jeffery took out on Jimi with Jeffery as the beneficiary…This was quite specifically clear in McDermott’s ‘Setting The Record Straight’…This account was 20 years before Tappy came out with his revelation about Jeffery admitting to murdering Jimi…So Tappy had nothing to do with this and when Bob was first approached he made it clear that Jimi came to him with a personal insurance policy bought by Jeffery with Jeffery as the beneficiary…Levine said in no uncertain terms that he had a bad feeling about it and warned Jimi not to sign…Jason is lying above and there is no honest person who would come away from Bob’s account there with any other understanding than Bob was indirectly saying he was worried Jeffery would murder Jimi in order to collect…Any intelligent person can see Jason stupidly trying to get around that with blather trolling and lying…In the real world that means Jason is badly losing this “debate”…Because Jason lives in a demented troll’s reality he also thinks he is getting away with ignoring Bob saying on video that he had suspicions that Jeffery murdered Jimi when I video-ed Bob 5 months before his death…Jason is big on trollishly quoting Bob – except when Bob is quoted saying Jeffery murdered Jimi…
Jason’s coverage of Bannister is a good example of how he lies and deliberately distorts context…I asked Bannister why they failed to register the meaning of the wine and he said to be honest with you we thought that the victim had somehow been involved in some kind of abuse of alcohol and drugs and ended up asphyxiating on the wine…Bannister was the intern, Seifert was the head registrar whose job it would be to medically judge the wine…Jason is once again deliberately lying because all Bannister and Seifert did at hospital was take the story Monika gave them and assume Jimi had overdosed on pills and choked on his own vomit…Jason is crazy enough to think people don’t see him using that dishonest approach to avoid the fact that once Bannister started telling the story of Jimi being drowned in an unusual amount of wine, the story never varied one iota…Seifert, on the other hand, was caught in a diametric lie of saying Jimi was covered in wine in one interview and he detected no alcohol on Jimi in another…A sure sign that Seifert got sloppy due to his awareness of the dangerousness of what he witnessed…Anyone can see Jason’s desperation to dishonestly force the meaning of out of context words while ignoring the greater evidence…
On the real world scoreboard, Jason idiotically trolls and fails to answer the easily-traced fact that Bob clearly said the insurance policy was a personal policy with Jeffery as the beneficiary in 1990 when he first spoke about the issue and Jason couldn’t use Tappy as an excuse for his lying around it…
Buster with his delusional rants made up a new phony claim and screwed up admitting no phony procedures at the hospital ever took place. Hilarious!
BUSTER says: Bob did not go to the press…The press came to him…Bob was legally blind so Jason’s lies are once again easily exposed…They came to him in reaction to Tappy’s book…
JASON says: Buster is lying through his rotten teeth. After Bob spoke with Wright and heard about his lies of the phony Hendrix wine drowning murder. Bob wanted to set the record straight. The press had no idea about Bob Levine until he revealed it was a lie. Bob said he had assistants who helped him. You have no clue what you’re talking about.
BOB LEVINE: “Jimi Hendrix was not murdered,” says Bob Levine, who was the US manager of the late guitarist at the time of his death in 1970. “Despite the allegations that have recently been made, I need to set the record straight once and for all. Jimi died an accidental death, but he definitely wasn’t murdered – not by Michael Jeffrey, his UK manager, and certainly not by anybody connected to him. The whole thing is one giant lie.”
JASON says: Bob is on record stating “he needed to set the record straight”. This is Bob going to the press: “Despite the allegations that have recently been made, I need to set the record straight once and for all. Jimi died an accidental death, but he definitely wasn’t murdered.”
BUSTER says: The problem Jason can’t overcome is out here in the real world where crooked moderators can’t ban you when you start gaining the advantage, Jason’s shit doesn’t fly and he can’t get away with that booby trolling he offers…I own this turf and I am in charge out here…
JASON says: That’s hilarious cuz I’ve debunked every bogus claim you ever made.
BUSTER says: If you look at Jason’s response he’s struggling and trying to blather around the point that when Bob first spoke about the subject in 1990 to McDermott he very specifically said that Jimi came to him with a personal insurance policy that Jeffery took out on Jimi with Jeffery as the beneficiary…This was quite specifically clear in McDermott’s ‘Setting The Record Straight’…This account was 20 years before Tappy came out with his revelation about Jeffery admitting to murdering Jimi…So Tappy had nothing to do with this and when Bob was first approached he made it clear that Jimi came to him with a personal insurance policy bought by Jeffery with Jeffery as the beneficiary…Levine said in no uncertain terms that he had a bad feeling about it and warned Jimi not to sign…Jason is lying above and there is no honest person who would come away from Bob’s account there with any other understanding than Bob was indirectly saying he was worried Jeffery would murder Jimi in order to collect…Any intelligent person can see Jason stupidly trying to get around that with blather trolling and lying…In the real world that means Jason is badly losing this “debate”…Because Jason lives in a demented troll’s reality he also thinks he is getting away with ignoring Bob saying on video that he had suspicions that Jeffery murdered Jimi when I video-ed Bob 5 months before his death…Jason is big on trollishly quoting Bob – except when Bob is quoted saying Jeffery murdered Jimi…
JASON says: All spin and no evidence as usual. Buster always claims opposite nonsense, having no evidence as documented evidence always refutes him. Then when documented evidence refutes him, he says “this is what they really meant”. The documented words of Bob Levine is clear, there was no phony insurance policy taken out on Jimi by Jeffery. Kathy Etchingham confirmed that was well. She read all the contracts and said it was bogus too. So, that’s two people who debunk Buster the clown as he spins another tall tale. Tappy Wright lied in order to sell a book, both Kathy and Bob confirmed it. Bob never said anything about “Jimi being murdered” you are a damn liar. You had a sick dying man on video as you were confusing him and upsetting him.
BUSTER says: Jason’s coverage of Bannister is a good example of how he lies and deliberately distortslies context…I asked Bannister why they failed to register the meaning of the wine and he said to be honest with you we thought that the victim had somehow been involved in some kind of abuse of alcohol and drugs and ended up asphyxiating on the wine…Bannister was the intern, Seifert was the head registrar whose job it would be to medically judge the wine…Jason is once again deliberately lying because all Bannister and Seifert did at hospital was take the story Monika gave them and assume Jimi had overdosed on pills and choked on his own vomit…Jason is crazy enough to think people don’t see him using that dishonest approach to avoid the fact that once Bannister started telling the story of Jimi being drowned in an unusual amount of wine, the story never varied one iota…Seifert, on the other hand, was caught in a diametric lie of saying Jimi was covered in wine in one interview and he detected no alcohol on Jimi in another…A sure sign that Seifert got sloppy due to his awareness of the dangerousness of what he witnessed…Anyone can see Jason’s desperation to dishonestly force the meaning of out of context words while ignoring the greater evidence…
JASON says: Buster is a total clown where he comes up with this idiotic crap. An “intern” would never be allowed to perform “phony procedures” on a 6 hour dead corpse like you’re claiming. Buster is claiming doctors “take the word” of a random stranger like Monika instead of finding the cause of death.
BUSTER says: Jason is once again deliberately lying because all Bannister and Seifert did at hospital was take the story Monika gave them and assume Jimi had overdosed on pills and choked on his own vomit.
JASON says: No fake wine drowning? No Jimi being “covered in wine”? No phony procedures like you usually claim? They took Monika’s word? You debunked your own wine hoax moron! You’re admitting no phony procedures at the hospital took place. LMAO!
BUSTER says: On the real world scoreboard, Jason idiotically trolls and fails to answer the easily-traced fact that Bob clearly said the insurance policy was a personal policy with Jeffery as the beneficiary in 1990 when he first spoke about the issue and Jason couldn’t use Tappy as an excuse for his lying around it…
JASON: Bob Levine and Kathy Etchingham confirmed no policy ever existed just like your fake wine.
The only traces of alcohol Dr. Teare found during the autopsy was an insignificant amount in Jimi’s urine and blood. Dr Teare was not some novice who would have missed someone drowned in alcohol and failed to report it. He was a highly experienced and respected pathologist who conducted some high profile autopsies. Jimi took a staggering 2,000mg of Vesparax when the safe dosage was only half a tablet; it’s hardly rocket science to understand how and why Jimi died.
The only crook here is Buster, the man of many pseudonyms, that invents bogus tales of fiction. Bob Levine went to the media himself to expose Tappy “The Fraud” Wright who made up terrible lies against Michael Jeffery and Jimi Hendrix. Tappy Wright was just a roadie and was not close to Jeffery. Bob Levine set the record straight and Buster is lying as usual. Thank You Bob!
BUSTER SAYS: The crooks who went to Bob for that quote were only interested in hearing that quote and didn’t probe any deeper like honest journalism requires…And Bob was just interested in getting rid of them and the whole subject by telling them what they wanted to hear…I’ve studied this issue more intensely and up close than anyone and I can tell you Bob and Tappy were people who would make blow-off statements like those Jason’s quotes in order to avoid their true doings…Tappy was the type who would say it was all bullshit in order to avoid fessing-up to how he really learned about it…Anyone with any common sense would realize Tappy was close to Jeffery, and Jeffery chose him to do the post-death Hendrix film tour, because Jeffery knew he could trust Tappy with his darkest secrets…
JASON says: Nice bullshit story. Levine went to the media himself to expose Tappy “The Fraud” Wright and gave more than one interview. You got busted lying again with your made up crap. Take it away Bob!
BOB LEVINE: “I told Tappy, ‘What are you doing making up this story? So you want to sell books – why do you have to print such lies?’ And he said to me, ‘Well, who’s going to challenge me? Everybody’s dead, everybody’s gone. Chas Chandler, Michael Jeffrey, Mitch Mitchell, Noel Redding…they’re all gone. Nobody can challenge what I write.'”
In Levine’s view, “Jimi Hendrix died by accident. He was a happy guy, looking forward to making music. And Michael Jeffrey didn’t have it out for Jimi in any way. I talked to him the day before Jimi died. He had major plans for Jimi. The future was very bright at the time. The whole thing about Michael taking out a life insurance policy and wanting to collect? That’s in Tappy’s imagination, too.
“Michael signed an insurance policy on Jimi that the record company took out, and Jimi was aware of this. But that’s standard. Frank Sinatra was insured by Reprise for millions of dollars. That’s how business is done. Record companies take out insurance policies on major artists all the time. But it was nothing ruthless or dastardly on Michael Jeffrey’s part. This is Tappy rewriting history.”
Now retired in living in Florida, Levine says that he’s saddened that Wright’s story might have found a way into Hendrix folklore. “It’s totally unfair to Jimi,” he says. “It’s unfair to everybody who was around at the time. I just think it’s really unfair to the fans, to anybody who ever loved Jimi Hendrix. Yes, he died a tragic death, and he died much too young. But spreading these lies that he was murdered? Bullshit! It’s utter crap, and I’ve been silent about this for much too long.”
JASON says: Wow! Bob Levine debunked Buster’s “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax”. Buster’s lies have been exposed again. Buster should listen to “his friend” Bob Levine, what Buster is doing to Jimi Hendrix and Jimi’s fans with his bogus decade long “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax” is totally unfair and a disgrace to the legacy of Jimi Hendrix.
Hi Jason, Michael Jeffrey said some very flattering things about Jimi after he died especially about Jimi’s growing spiritually and true persona – a quiet introspective and intelligent young man. Michael was so upset by Jimi’s death that he as unable to leave his car at Jimi’s funeral in Seattle. Chas Chandler also remarked about the stories that depicted Jimi as a gloomy sad person when the opposite was true Jimi’s life was full of fun. Jimi’s death was a tragedy unlike his real life.
Conspiracy theorists, authors and journalists who write derogatory and fake stories about people who have passed away are well aware of posthumous defamation laws otherwise they would think twice about saying and writing what they do. There needs to be a change in the law to make these people accountable for what they say and write about people who are no longer around to defend themselves. The truth needs to triumph and false stories need to be nipped in the bud before they take hold as has happened with death of Jimi Hendrix. These murder claims were non existent for decades and only came about because of a dumb book written in the nineties that no one with any intelligence took seriously. Some of us want to make sure that these fake stories are buried for good. Kathy Etchingham did an extensive investigation that confirmed and reaffirmed that Jimi died of as a result of taking too many of Monika’s Vesparax. Jimi was not a victim of murder.
Hi Ivana,
Haha freaking hilarious! Buster has gotta be on drugs.
Buster uses phony conspiracy theories from fraudsters Tappy Wright and Sharon Lawrence for his “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax”. The pages of their books are only good to line the bottom of a cat litter box.
Bob Levine decimated Buster’s decade long hoax in one interview with the truth.
Thank You Bob!
If Bob was still alive he’d say you’re very welcome Jason, just keep going!🙂
Hi Jason, Be afraid be very afraid about Buster’s threat of legal action against you for telling the truth. LOL 😂
Buster compiled bogus Jimi Hendrix “murder” conspiracy stories from hoaxers Tappy “The Fraud” Wright and Sharon Lawrence. All their claims have been debunked by the late Bob Levine and Kathy Etchingham speaking out in the press.
Buster is no “researcher”. It doesn’t take much “research” to read bogus books and believe the nonsense printed inside it. Buster is a decade long serial hoaxer pushing this phony Hendrix murder myth.
Bob and Kathy said these fake claims are ridiculous and have no merit. They debunked the fake Hendrix “murder” claims with facts, evidence, and documents.
“Jimi Hendrix was not murdered.”- Bob Levine, Hendrix’s US Manager
“No, Jimi wasn’t murdered. So, the next time someone tells you he didn’t die of a drug overdose…of course he did!”- Kathy Etchingham, Jimi’s former girlfriend investigated his death
I’ve been reading about what happened to some of the people associated with Jimi. 1. Kathy Etchingham 73 living abroad. 2. Mitch Mitchell 62 died of natural causes. 3. Noel Redding 57 ill health. Chas Chandler 57 ill health. Michael Jeffrey 40 plane crash. Monika Dannemann 50 suicide. Devon Wilson 27 drugs overdose.
Monika also appeared in that Warner Bros documentary of the early 70’s. In it she said that Jimi was breathing normally and she checked Jimi’s pulse while waiting for the ambulance. Odd thing to say because the autopsy established that Jimi died in the early hours of the morning and the ambulance arrived about 11am. The ambulance officers also said that Jimi looked as if he had been dead for a while.
The autopsy never established that Jimi died in the early hours of the morning…That is stupidly wrong information coming from an uncredible source (Ivana)…That was exactly the problem…That the autopsy and Inquest never established any time of death…It was Dr Crompton who said Jimi died no later than 5:30am because of the undigested rice Teare found in Jimi’s stomach (and then forensically ignored)…That time of death lined up nicely with the real events…Monika obviously started calling out when Jimi was dead and the others took 5 hours to clean-up a murder scene…If Jimi was laying there struggling from an overdose there is no way they would leave him there for 5 hours while they dusted and vacuumed…It is quite obvious that the reason they left Jimi there on the bed while they removed evidence for 5 hours is because they all knew he was murdered…Ivana is too stupid to realize she is only proving our case…
It’s amazing how much this serial troll Buster lies for his fake “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax”.
Buster claims he’s a fan of Tony Brown and says he read his book, but Buster lies about the time Dr. Crompton estimated that Jimi died that was published in Brown’s book. You just read Buster’s hoaxing bullshit above.
Here’s the facts that Brown published:
“According to Crompton, food usually remains in the stomach for less than four hours. Based on the post-mortem identification of whole rice grains in Hendrix’s stomach and reports that Hendrix ate rice sometime between 11 p.m. and 12 a.m., Crompton concluded that Hendrix died no later than 4 a.m.”
Crompton said Hendrix died no later than 4am and Buster is lying hoaxing us with his phony 5:30am claim to make it look like Jimi died later. Buster is just the same as Monika Dannemann lying about Jimi’s time of death.
Both ambulance men said Jimi had been dead for a long time since the vomit was completely dry. Bannister, Siefert, and Brown already knew Jimi was dead for hours on 9-18-70 when he was wheeled in.
Dusting and vacuuming? Nobody was doing that. Buster is making up more bullshit and has no case. He is a hoaxer who makes up crap suppressing the real evidence. He has been debunked again.
Jason: Because you are only interested in shallow nay-say trolling you are too stupid and too caught up in your own trolling fever to realize you just proved my point…Because you are moronically clueless to the forensic case I offer you fail to detect that a 4am time of death only proves my case even more…Because you have a troll’s moronic lack of grasp of what is being argued here you fail to detect that if Jimi died at 4am that only strengthens my case against the British government that they failed to properly investigate Jimi’s death and include it in the forensic evidence…You have to be incredibly dumb to not realize it would be impossible for Jimi to overdose from the pills if he died at 4am because there wasn’t enough time to do that if Jimi got back to the Samarkand at 3:10am…Boy are you stupid…
I never said the 5:30am time of death claim was from Brown…It was from Kathy’s book…Because Jason has a moronic lack of grasp of what is being argued here he fails to realize that the .7mg barbiturate blood content is more conducive to Crompton’s 5:30am time of death claim…That’s why they do forensics (which they decided not to do in Jimi’s case)…Jason is also too dumb to realize the 4 hour average digestion rate for clearing the stomach means the rice can’t be found in the stomach past 6:45am (4 hours after Jimi ate it)…
I look forward to Jason’s response where he refuses to admit he just fell flat on his face…But I look forward with even more anticipation to the childish trash talk and blather-trolling Jason answers with where he once again conspicuously dodges answering the evidence while trollishly claiming victory…
Buster, you never had a case since you only peddle debunked conspiracy theories.
Jimi’s death time is only an estimation. It is not scientific. Nobody knows at what exact time he died. That’s why Crompton 20+ years later only estimated.
Jimi’s autopsy confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from an lethal overdose. Dr. Rufus Crompton confirmed that to Kathy Etchingham. Scientific medical data proves it and no imaginary wine was ever found or witnessed.
Jimi also took drugs at Kameron’s party before he returned with Monika.
Buster still has never produced any medical data for his imaginary wine cuz it doesn’t exist.
Buster doesn’t seem to realize how his “Wine Hoax” blows up in his face with the evidence of rice found in Hendrix’s stomach. If Fraud Bannister was sucking Hendrix dry from all the “imaginary wine”, then the rice wouldn’t have been left behind for the autopsy. It all would have been removed by Fraud Bannister. The rice in Jimi’s stomach means there wasn’t a phony “wine drowning”. Dr. Teare examined Hendrix’s stomach and did forensic analysis of his tissues and stomach lining. No abnormal amount of alcohol was detected. If Hendrix was “drowned in wine” it would have been detected. Again, medical science debunks these phony conspiracy theories.
Also, Buster still doesn’t know that 0.7 is well above the toxic 0.5 toxic level making 0.7 lethal. That 0.7 level destroyed Jimi’s liver. Dr. Crompton confirmed Jimi would have died anyway from the amount of Vesparax he took. The only reason he died faster was he suffocated in his vomit.
Hilarious how Buster says I’m “trolling” when I produce documented facts and medical evidence and he parrots the lies from fraudsters Tappy Wright and Sharon Lawrence without any evidence from their fiction books.
More idiotic ignoring of the evidence from Jason…We have a very good idea of when Jimi died because Eric Burdon’s truthful account in 1986 said Monika called him “maybe even earlier than the first light of dawn”…Dawn on September 18th in London is around 6am…A little earlier would be in the 5:30am ballpark…The case of evidence I am presenting, that Jason is avoiding, shows that Jimi was witnessed eating that rice at 2:45 right before he left Kameron’s…As Crompton correctly cited, and Teare failed to do as an autopsy doctor, it takes 4 hours for the stomach to clear its contents…So according to the established evidence the rice could not be in Jimi’s stomach past 6:45am…According to Monika that was a half hour before Jimi even took the pills…If we acknowledge the obvious, that Monika was calling Burdon because Jimi had just been murdered, then we have a very clear evidence framework that more than proves Jimi died around 5:30am as Crompton correctly determined…It doesn’t take grown adults 5 hours to figure-out they need to call an ambulance for a world famous person who is struggling with an overdose…It does however take 5 hours to clean-up murder evidence and let the known murderer get away…
Jason is once again lying and ignoring already-presented evidence…Flyswatter deftly proved that when the London Coroner’s Office finds a lethal amount of barbiturate it always uses the scientific nomenclature of “Poisoning”…Jimi’s Death Certificate listed “Intoxication” as the cause of death therefore confirming a less than lethal amount of barbiturate in the .7mg measurement Teare originally found…More confirmation was given when the certificate also stated “asphyxiation on vomit” as the cause of death…Jason is a sick pup who is deliberately ignoring the proven evidence and taunting things he knows are untrue for gas-lighting trolling effect…The doctor who signed-off on that information, Dr Thurston, also confirmed the stomach full of red wine…
Dr Bannister made it clear in his interviews that when he and Seifert cleared the lungs of wine they kept refilling with wine that surged from the stomach…Jason is, of course, a moron because any fool would realize that Seifert and Bannister were racing to get Jimi’s lungs clear so they could attempt resuscitation…They were not going to waste any time suctioning the rice out of Jimi’s stomach…The rice was there and was duly noted in Teare’s autopsy…This is just another example of Jason’s reckless violation of common sense and the evidence in his attempt to deny…
Jason ignores that the full weight of the evidence shows a cover-up that was deliberately perpetrated by the British medical and legal authorities…So once Thurston confirmed that Jimi’s stomach contents showed a large amount of red wine had been imbibed, therefore Teare’s failure to note the wine becomes suspicious and points to deliberate corruption…How could Thurston know about the wine and Teare not?…The real world scoreboard here is: Witnesses for the wine – Bannister, Thurston, Brown, and Seifert & Dannemann caught obviously lying…Clearly the wine was real and did exist as described…
Jason continues to stupidly ignore that .5mg is not a lethal level for barbiturate…I already posted that the manufacturer listed Lethal Dose as “9 or 10 tablets” (for persons with no tolerance)…If Jimi had a .7mg blood barbiturate level from 9 Vesparax then that means he was not in the lethal range, as proven by the Coroner’s refusal to list barbiturate poisoning as the cause of death…Jason is lying and playing games with semantics…”Toxic” does not equate to “Lethal”…Jason contemptuously ignores that there wasn’t enough time for Jimi, with his notorious tolerance, to die from the pills in the 1 to 2 hours he had those pills inside him…Not to mention he didn’t take enough pills to die anyway with his notorious tolerance…This is also indirect proof the wine drowned Jimi (as was indirectly listed on the Death Certificate)…Jason also idiotically ignores that you can’t have your liver destroyed by a dose that isn’t enough to be fatal…He’s just repeating the same already-refuted garbage…
Lastly, Jason ignores that no documented case of any real Vesparax overdose produced the extreme vomiting the ambulance men witnessed…What was described in those other cases was some strange red foam in the mouth but no other documented real Vesparax overdose case, with 1 to 6 more tablets than Jimi took, ever had that amount of vomiting that the ambulance men said was unusual…That amount of vomit is normal for drowning cases however…
BUSTER says: More idiotic ignoring of the evidence from Jason…We have a very good idea of when Jimi died because Eric Burdon’s truthful account in 1986 said Monika called him “maybe even earlier than the first light of dawn”…Dawn on September 18th in London is around 6am…A little earlier would be in the 5:30am ballpark…The case of evidence I am presenting, that Jason is avoiding, shows that Jimi was witnessed eating that rice at 2:45 right before he left Kameron’s…As Crompton correctly cited, and Teare failed to do as an autopsy doctor, it takes 4 hours for the stomach to clear its contents…So according to the established evidence the rice could not be in Jimi’s stomach past 6:45am…According to Monika that was a half hour before Jimi even took the pills…If we acknowledge the obvious, that Monika was calling Burdon because Jimi had just been murdered, then we have a very clear evidence framework that more than proves Jimi died around 5:30am as Crompton correctly determined…It doesn’t take grown adults 5 hours to figure-out they need to call an ambulance for a world famous person who is struggling with an overdose…It does however take 5 hours to clean-up murder evidence and let the known murderer get away…
JASON says: Still we have more estimations and a decade later recollection with no real evidence to support your false claim.
“Known murderers”? Please tell us who these “known murderers” are.
You just don’t get it Buster. You look more and more like a fool with every senseless post. The people at the Samarkand that morning would not have been implicating themselves in a murder. None of them were charged with being an accessory after the fact because it’s pretty obvious that this wasn’t a murder scene it was an overdose just like the ambulance and police officers witnessed. Where Monika failed was not calling the ambulance immediately instead she phoned around for help firstly to Judy Wong and then to Eric Burdon who said he received that phone call in the early hours. Monika was reluctant to call that ambulance because Jimi was obviously dead from the massive overdose he took of Monika’s Vesparax and she didn’t want to be implicated in his death. If Jimi had been drowned in wine this would have surely raised the suspicion of the ambulance officers and they would not have said this was an overdose. Your problem Buster is not accepting that Jimi died the way he did from foolishly taking someone else’s prescription medication. Instead you would rather have him die from gruesomely being murdered from waterboarding with wine. You need a mental and reality check.
Serial trolling clown Buster is no “Jimi Hendrix expert”. He doesn’t even know the basics using bogus conspiracy theories and his made up nonsense for his phony “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax”. Buster is a lightweight having very little information to provide. He makes a fool of himself every time he posts.
Bob Levine, Jimi’s former US manger and Kathy Etchingham, Jimi’s former girlfriend investigated Jimi’s death and read all of Jimi’s contract and medical reports. Bob and Kathy obliterated Buster the Clown’s hoaxing lies of the phony “insurance policy” that never existed. This is documented sources and evidence that Buster does not have. Two different people have said there never was an “insurance policy”. The hoax blows up in Buster’s face again.
Bob Levine: “The whole thing about Michael taking out a life insurance policy and wanting to collect? That’s in Tappy’s imagination, too.”
“Tappy wrote that Jeffrey was afraid that Jimi was going to leave him for a new manager,” says Levine. “He also said that Jeffrey had taken out an insurance policy on Jimi that was worth a couple of million dollars and that he wanted to collect on it. “All of which is ridiculous,” says Levine.
Kathy Etchingham: “The idea Jimi was murdered for an insurance policy is hogwash.”
Kathy dismisses a recent claim from Wright that Hendrix was murdered on the orders of Mike Jeffery to cash in on an insurance policy after Hendrix refused to renew his management contract. “I’ve seen the contract. It had two and a half more years to run,” said Etchingham.
JASON says: Buster is busted again.
Bob and Kathy knew Jimi and his business matters, knowing full well Jeffery didn’t have any multi million dollar insurance policy on Jimi. These bogus claims are all part of the nonsensical conspiracy theories that Tappy “The Fraud” Wright cooked up for his bogus book a decade ago. Amateur “researchers” like Buster the Clown use these stupid conspiracy theories claiming Jimi was “murdered”. Bob Levine and Kathy Etchingham took care of those false claims by telling the truth to the press officially debunking them.
Be prepared for more bogus conspiracy theories from Buster the Clown without any evidence except for his own hoaxing words. He’s got nothin’.
Hi Jason, I’ve just finished reading an article about the death of Jimi Hendrix. There are some major discrepancies in the earlier and later accounts given by the ambulance attendants and doctors. They are now saying that Jimi was unconscious when brought into casualty otherwise he would have been taken directly to the morgue. While another said he died at the back of the ambulance. If these later accounts are true then Jimi was not murdered by waterboarding back at the Samarkand Hotel. At any rate Jimi died from suffocating on his own vomit caused by Monika’s Vesparax that much we know is right and true confirmed by Kathy’s investigation and Dr. Crompton’s reading of Dr. Teare’s autopsy report.
It’s pretty simple to differentiate fact from fiction in Jimi’s death. None of the biographies or reports written close to Jimi’s death hint at murder. Some of the tabloid press back then wrote that Jimi died as a result of taking illicit drugs but after the inquest all these stories disappeared replaced with Dr. Thurston’s report in reference to Dr. Teare’s autopsy results. One of the better biographies was written by Chris Welsh in the early 70’s mainly because he was able to interview the main Hendrix personnel including Michael Jeffrey. Unfortunately some of the less discerning have fallen for a trashy book written by Tappy Wright that accuses Michael Jeffrey of murdering Jimi with red wine, and these lies have continued with the help of conspiracy theorists and gossipy biographers.
Hi Ivana,
I’ve said a while ago that there are many after the fact conflicting accounts regarding Jimi’s death. People have made comments and contradicted themselves with statements they made. Two things that we do know, is that Jimi was not “murdered” and there was no “wine drowning”. It was a drug overdose as confirmed.
Some European news organizations did report that Jimi was pronounced dead in the ambulance when it arrived at St. Mary Abbotts Hospital. All the major news outlets reported that Jimi was pronounced dead on arrival. So, we know Dr. Siefert and Dr. Brown were correct when they stated there was “nothing they could do for Jimi cuz he was dead for a long time”. Even Fraud Bannister admitted to that as well.
Later claims from the ambulance men and Siefert are contradictory claiming Jimi was still alive and barely breathing when he arrived. Those claims would go with what Monika was claiming.
The fact that Jimi was pronounced dead on arrival as reported in all the media on
9-18-70 confirms he was already dead. Plus the ambulance men gave a graphic description of the death scene and stated Hendrix was dead for a while. That flows with what the doctors stated as well.
As I’ve said, there are many conflicting stories and we will never know all of it, but Jimi died of a drug overdose as confirmed by the ambulance men, police, hospital, Dr. Siefert, Dr. Brown, Dr. Teare, Dr. Thurston, the media, Bob Levine, Kathy Etchingham, Ginger Baker, and others who knew Jimi. Only the fraudsters made up nonsense “murder and wine” stories 20, 30, 40, 50+ years later.
No interventional procedures are performed on the dead who come into casualty this is simply not permitted as it goes against hospital protocol. If Jimi was unconscious when brought into casualty that morning then this would have warranted any work done on him. Jimi died in the early hours of the morning back at the Samarkand Hotel and the ambulance arrived after 11 so it’s fair to say that Jimi would not have been alive unless Monika couldn’t tell the difference between someone who was alive or dead. All that Vesparax would have knocked Jimi out almost immediately; this is confirmed by the fact that Jimi was found fully clothed on top of the bed. If the vomiting hadn’t caused Jimi’s death then he would have gone into cardiac arrest. The Vesparax had already caused liver damage because of its toxicity; Jimi didn’t stand a chance.
You are stupidly ignoring what Flyswatter already showed Ivana…Elvis was dead when they brought him in and they worked on him for a full hour…Your input isn’t worth responding to…You also ignore that the half hour they worked on Jimi was told of by Dr Bannister and confirmed as true in the Hospital Report…They worked on Jimi because they are required to try to bring anyone they receive back to life if possible…They worked on him because getting the unusually large amount of wine out of his lungs was a priority they got right to without thinking…By your logic all drowned people would just be dropped at the shore and no attempt to get the water out of their lungs and revive them would ever be attempted…You are a true idiot Ivana…And troll…It’s pretty stupid (and trollish) to ignore a Hospital Report that confirms the half hour…
What a fool! I don’t think I’ve ever come across reasoning like yours Buster. You are Flyswatter this is just another one of your pseudonyms to show that you have some support for your nonsense. I suggest you read the autopsy report about how toxic the Vesparax was this is what killed Jimi the wine has absolutely no relevance in his death. Think twice before responding to my posts with your lies in future.
Elvis again? Quite the fake Jimi Hendrix story Buster made up.
We all know Buster’s alias is Flyswatter. Buster trolls websites with various aliases pushing his phony Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax.
Elvis got out of bed, went to the bathroom, got sick, and died on the bathroom floor. His girlfriend Ginger Alden was in the next room. Plus all the medical staff at the hospital knew Elvis cuz he was secretly taken there for medical attention by the Memphis Mafia and Dr. Nick on several occasions for overdoses. Totally different scenario from Jimi Hendrix.
Jimi Hendrix was alone dead on a bed for several hours covered in dry vomit. Nobody knew who he was. When he arrived at the hospital, he was pronounced ‘dead on arrival’, that means NO work is performed on a dead several hour rotting corpse.
Dr. Bob Brown stated “there was nothing he could do for Jimi cuz he was dead for several hours”. Siefert said the same thing. Even Fraud Bannister admitted “resuscitation was merely a formality”. He described Hendrix as being cold, blue, dead for hours with a rotting mouth. No medical staff is going to work on a several hour dead rotting corpse. It can’t be brought back to life. The brain is dead and the heart could never be started. Buster is a moron and is doing a terrible job with his hoax.
Hendrix was never “drowned”. Fraud Bannister made up a bogus tale. He was convicted for 3 counts of fraud and medical malpractice losing his medical license for life. No hospital medical record exists of any phony procedures performed on Jimi Hendrix. Kathy read all the hospital medical documents and there was nothing written about phony “procedures” or “unusual amounts of wine”. That’s why she laughs at this conspiracy crap.
Buster keeps entering these same stupid conspiracy theories and all of these have been debunked months ago. Can’t imagine why he would waste over a decade of his life making up stuff that never happened to Jimi Hendrix. He needs mental help.
We’re dealing with two not too bright internet trolls in Jason and Ivana…Any intelligent person could see Flyswatter and myself are different persons…Just the fact Flyswatter has the sense to not waste his time on two obvious internet trolls should tell you enough…Ivana doesn’t have the integrity to own up to her stupid remark that emergency rooms don’t work on dead people…Flyswatter found Elvis’s hospital report and it showed they worked on him for a full hour despite his being obviously dead on arrival…So Ivana is proven to be talking shit and not knowing what she is taking about and also too dishonest to admit it…They worked on Jimi because as soon as he arrived on their emergency room table Seifert and Bannister realized his lungs were full of wine and got right to suctioning it out because they knew he had no chance if his lungs were full of wine…Ivana is pretty stupid because if you care to notice she admitted the wine in her last post after stupidly, trollishly denying it for over a year…
This asshole Jason is just repeating already-refuted lies…We’ve gone over this repeatedly and Jason is just trollishly repeating the same already-refuted bullshit…Seifert & Bannister had no idea how long Jimi was dead when they received him…The reason Jason is a sick liar is because his own quotes contain information that shows they did work on Jimi, counter to the trolling teasing Jason is doing by posting denial of it…Jason is a sick pup and he’s hoping I will hit on his troll bait and continue his trolling denial…While saying Jimi was an obvious long-dead corpse upon whom no effort to revive was made, any look at even Seifert’s accounts shows that he admitted he worked on Jimi…Jason is a sick liar because the Hospital Report shows in writing that they worked on Jimi from 11:45 to 12:15…Again – Jason is lying because Jimi was never pronounced dead on arrival upon reception…Those terms only came up later with Les Perrin’s comment on British radio…The death pronouncement was listed on the Hospital Report as occurring at 12:15…Jason is a liar and troll who is deliberately lying against the more than established, written in stone facts…
The reason Jimi wasn’t obviously dead was because he was put in to a partial coma paralysis by just the right borderline level of barbiturate combined with the drowning reflex from lungs full of wine…Enter that state on the correct glide path and you can ease in to a limbo between life and death…This is a fairly simple issue, you can either believe the doctor who was there or you can believe an obvious degenerate lying internet scum like Jason who is trolling basic facts…Bannister was obviously telling the truth and Seifert was obviously lying…This piece of shit Jason attacks Bannister and asks us to believe Seifert’s lies…
Here is where Jason shows his retardation towards the evidence…He stupidly fails to realize that once he admits Jimi was dead for hours before Hospital that he is admitting the murder evidence…Dr Crompton was quite correct in his 5:30am time of death…Anyone with any common sense would realize Monika first started calling-out to get help not because Jmi was struggling with an overdose but because he was dead…Monika called the people who were sympathetic with Jeffery and they acted as expected…Jason avoids committing to exactly how long Jimi was dead because he knows if he admits the true times involved he’ll have to commit to the forensics that accompany it…The autopsy and Inquest did the exact same thing for the same reason…Murder-deniers show the same guilty pattern of knowing what to avoid…
This “Bannister was a fraud and a liar” BS is kiddie level stupidity that has been gotten away with by scumbags like Jim Hawthorn and the assholes on Crosstown Torrents for decades…Bannister was a truth-teller who got persecuted by the Nazi government scum who murdered Jimi…Jason is their oral servant boy…Jason has the balls to ignore that we caught Seifert lying when he said “Jimi was covered in red wine” and “I detected no alcohol on Jimi” as well as “The monitor was flat-lining when we hooked him up to it” and “Perhaps there was some breathing involved at Hospital”…Seifert was clearly gotten to and was lying to cover-up just like Crompton…Which means Teare also criminally corrupted the autopsy (which is not a crime in England where there is no Constitution and such a cover-up can be legally ordered on a covert basis)…
BUSTER says: We’re dealing with two not too bright internet trolls in Jason and Ivana…Any intelligent person could see Flyswatter and myself are different persons…Just the fact Flyswatter has the sense to not waste his time on two obvious internet trolls should tell you enough…Ivana doesn’t have the integrity to own up to her stupid remark that emergency rooms don’t work on dead people…Flyswatter found Elvis’s hospital report and it showed they worked on him for a full hour despite his being obviously dead on arrival…So Ivana is proven to be talking shit and not knowing what she is taking about and also too dishonest to admit it…They worked on Jimi because as soon as he arrived on their emergency room table Seifert and Bannister realized his lungs were full of wine and got right to suctioning it out because they knew he had no chance if his lungs were full of wine…Ivana is pretty stupid because if you care to notice she admitted the wine in her last post after stupidly, trollishly denying it for over a year…
JASON says: We’re dealing with a serial troll and pathological liar named “Buster”.
You are FlySwatter. The moderator at another website said you were. You also use “Ralph Yates”, “Albert Doyle”, “Brian Doyle”, “Jetblast”, “Scrum Drum”, and other aliases you post with for your hoax.
Do you have a reading comprehension problem or a problem retaining facts and information? I just told you Elvis got sick and died in the bathroom and was taken to the hospital with the Memphis mafia and the hospital knew Elvis. Hendrix was dead for several hours and was a rotting corpse. We’ve already been over this and your hoax was exposed as a fraud. Emergency room doctors don’t work on a several hour dead rotting corpse. You’re a lunatic.
Hendrix was dead for several hours and they couldn’t save him. Dr. Bob Brown already confirmed it. So, it’s YOU who is full of shit.
“I did locum jobs at five or six different little hospitals while I was there. One of them was St. Mary Abbots Hospital, and I was working there when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead. Straight away, I knew who he was, but there was nothing I could do for him. There were a lot of people weeping and much commotion. Poor Jimi.” – Doctor Bob Brown
Dr. Bob Brown is TELLING you nothing was done for Jimi Hendrix. There was no wine, no phony procedures, no medical documents for “procedures” exist. It never happened. Jimi was confirmed by the hospital as ‘dead on arrival’ from a drug overdose. You have been debunked again.
When Jimi arrived at the hospital he was described as being cold, blue with no pulse and had the telltale signs of someone who had been dead for a while which tallies with his dying in the early hours of the morning and arriving at the hospital after 11.30am. The resuscitation attempt was a mere formality which consisted of pounding Jimi’s chest a few times. This was done in order to establish a time of death and not in an attempt to bring Jimi back to life. Apart from the fact that resuscitating someone who had been dead for hours would have been impossible the toll it would have taken on Jimi’s body would have been enormous. Jimi would have been severely disabled mentally and physically.
Elvis unlike Jimi died of natural causes brought about by a few pre existing conditions and unhealthy lifestyle. On the other hand Jimi died as a result of taking someone else’s prescription medication. Dr. Teare described Jimi as a well nourished and muscular young man with all major organs normal. There were no signs that he died in a violent way. Elvis died at age 42 and Jimi at 27. I remember both their death announcements on radio, television and newspapers.
Hi Ivana,
Have you read the latest asinine nonsense from Buster aka FlySwatter aka Brian Doyle aka Albert Doyle or whatever name he’s using?
He’s now claiming Jimi was “alive” when he was brought into the hospital contradicting his own phony “wine drowning death claim”. Buster made up a brand new fake claim for us.
“Jimi was alive” Buster now says, even though both ambulance men, the police, Fraud Bannister, Dr. Siefert, Dr. Bob Brown all said Hendrix was dead for hours. Fraud Bannister said Hendrix was a cold, dead, blue, rotting corpse but somehow they still managed to induce Jimi into a “partial coma” to do “phony procedures” on him. Jimi must have been a magic corpse that came back to life according to Buster.
This guy “Buster” is a full on psycho who needs mental help ASAP. He still won’t admit he lost his scam claiming Jimi was “murdered with imaginary wine”. He makes up even worse stories to keep it going.
Read this:
BUSTER says: The reason Jimi wasn’t obviously dead was because he was put in to a partial coma paralysis by just the right borderline level of barbiturate combined with the drowning reflex from lungs full of wine.
This last line is ridiculous it doesn’t mean a thing. I can’t stop laughing. But Buster is a graduate of the Three Stooges School of Medicine.
Hi Jason, Buster has decided to rewrite the Hendrix story so it doesn’t resemble the truth at all. This guy is seriously nuts. His rants are becoming more and more fantastical by the minute. He’s back to making derogatory remarks about both of us in a desperate attempt to look credible but it has the opposite effect. If anyone wants to know what really happened to Jimi all they need to do is read Dr. Teare’s autopsy report; it’s all there in black and white. Monika didn’t shove the pills down Jimi’s throat he made the decision to take them, at some point you’re got to be responsible for your actions. Where Monika failed was allowing Jimi to take as many as he did without disclosing how potent they actually were. If Jimi had all the information at hand perhaps he would declined to take them. I’d like to know how exactly the doctors knew Jimi had wine in his lungs just by looking at him if there wasn’t any. This is just another B.S. claim. But then conspiracy theories are all far fetched, full of inaccuracies and misinformation appealing to the feeble minded like Buster.
Hi Ivana,
Buster has veered way off script, and now we see the self destruction of his own hoax like we saw months before. Whenever he comes back from a hiatus, we get more crazy new claims since his past ones were debunked.
Buster is calling us derogatory names cuz he’s angry that he’s cornered and can’t explain his hoax. He knows his game is up and he’s flailing badly throwing out whatever nonsense he can think up.
We’ve both debunked his false claims many times and he still repeats them over and over. He has no real documented evidence to produce as he narrates his tales of fiction. St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from an overdose and Buster ignores it. The entire media on 9-18-70 confirmed Jimi was pronounced ‘dead on arrival’. No medical reports exist of these phony ”procedures” and Kathy Etchingham confirmed it as well. But Buster still lies claiming “wine” was removed when no wine was found at the flat. Dr Bob Brown said “there was nothing he could do for Jimi”. That means nothing was done, but Buster concocts another phony story to claim “procedures” were done cuz he’s a lunatic.
Buster said Jimi died at 5:30am. But now, Buster says Jimi magically “came back to life” after being dead for hours, was miraculously now in a “coma” to have imaginary wine removed that the doctors could also magically detect. So, Buster destroys his own hoax with a new absurd phony story. He added the new “coma” story cuz he knows Hendrix being dead for hours kills his hoax and needs something new to still claim “procedures” were performed. The guy is a raving mad lunatic. Nobody has ever talked about this except for Buster making it up himself.
Buster’s hoax doesn’t have logic Ivana, it’s fiction, so his his tales of doctors will already know about imaginary wine just by looking is the nonsense you get from him.
Buster also believes hospitals don’t do tests on a person brought into a hospital either. He also believes during an autopsy no forensic analysis is done on Hendrix and Teare just looked at him and guessed what happened. He also believes you can have a stomach full of wine, and rice, and the rice will still be there when he says all wine was sucked out of Jimi’s stomach. Buster is a nut and everybody reading is just shaking their heads just like posters laugh him off other sites he trolls.
Hi Jason, I remember reading that Monika told her brother in Germany that Jimi wanted to sleep for over a day before he headed back to New York this might explain why he took so many of Monika’s Vesparax. It’s pretty obvious that Monika wasn’t around in her flat when the ambulance arrived because she never talked about what they did all she said was that the ambulance officers carried Jimi up the stairs in a chair. This tallies with her watching these events from across the road just like Terry Slater said. If Monika was at the flat then surely she would have told the officers who they were dealing with, and the police wouldn’t have needed to be called. The doctors would also have known this was Jimi Hendrix if Monika had travelled to the hospital in the ambulance like she said.
Hi Ivana,
Excellent point. Yeah, Monika said in interviews Jimi was going to be busy and wanted to sleep for a long time so he took the pills. Like Kathy said, Jimi couldn’t read German and didn’t realize they were that powerful. So, he took extra pills to sleep longer not knowing these pills would equal 35 barbiturates. That’s where Monika is to blame cuz she said “they were weak” and then “too strong”.
She was never there in the flat and across the street, Burdon also said she was. Saua and Jones would have known it was Jimi Hendrix if Monika was there at the flat and went in the ambulance. Hendrix was a John Doe until he arrived at the hospital and Dr. Bob Brown said he recognized the body as Jimi Hendrix in an interview a decade ago. Brown said Hendrix was dead for several hours and there was nothing that could be done for him. Stickells made the official identification that some sources said at noon. Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival so he was dead as soon as he reached the hospital.
Is everybody enjoying Buster’s new fantasy version of Jimi’s death where he calls it a “murder”?
Buster has really outdone himself this time. He took his hoax and expanded it to the ultimate absurd where he debunked his own former phony stories.
Let’s see how Buster’s new fairy tale unfolds.
Buster claims a ‘murderer” or “murderers” stuffed pills down Jimi’s throat. Waited for him to become under the influence and then began pouring wine down his throat and spilling it all over the place.
Not a single authority who viewed the flat saw any wine anywhere but Buster says it was magically there.
Now if a person was forced with gallons of wine, they would be dead from alcohol poisoning and drowned to death. But, not Jimi Hendrix. According to Buster, Jimi was in a coma and still alive even though both ambulance men and the police testified that he was dead hours.
Somehow an hours long dead Jimi Hendrix was still comatose and was rushed to St. Mary Abbotts Hospital where the on staff doctors just by looking at him assumed he was filled with wine in his stomach and went to work for a half hour sucking out wine.
Even though all 3 doctors confirmed Jimi was dead for several hours and was cold, blue, no circulation in his body, and a black rotting mouth…Buster says Jimi was still alive needing emergency medical prodecures that has no recorded evidence of ever happening.
Buster says that doctors had no idea how long Jimi was dead for. Well, when doctors see a dead stiff decomposing body they know it’s been several hours it expired.
So, they want to work for a half hour sucking out wine from Jimi’s stomach but managed to leave all the rice behind for Dr. Teare to discover. Sometime during the sucking of the wine, Jimi pased away even though Dr. Bob Brown said Jimi was dead on arrival. Dr. Siefert and even Fraud Bannister admitted Jimi was dead on admission but even he lied about the phony wine.
Somewhere along the line, Dr. Thurston got wind of the imaginary wine and covered it all up but decided to spill the beans to an obscure reporter so the covert operation was exposed and not written about until 31 years later in Sharon Lawrence’s fiction book.
So, Jimi Hendrix was confirmed to be dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbotts Hospital and reported all over the world. They also confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from an overdose that was also confirmed with the autopsy.
But Buster tells us that didn’t happen, only his version is the correct version where a several hour long dead rotting corpse was rushed to the hospital coming back to life to have emergency procedures performed.
Fantastic story Buster. Can’t wait to hear your next one. Cheers!
Hi Jason, Buster counters everything with everyone was gotten to and there was a massive cover-up. This is classic conspiracy theory stuff. Jimi took the Vesparax in the early hours and the ambulance was called after 11am. No-one would have survived that. It’s just basic common sense which Buster is obviously short on.
Going back to Monika’s appearance on the Warner Bros documentary of the early 70’s she said that while she was waiting for the ambulance she was checking Jimi’s pulse, he was breathing normally but that he had been sick and she couldn’t wake him. No mention of wine or murder by anyone in this documentary. Decades later we have murder by wine. No where else is there mention of wine not by the ambulance officers, police, Drs Teare and Thurston on the death certificate or autopsy report. Kathy’s massive investigation didn’t uncover any murder plot what it did do was confirm and reaffirm the official findings of the day.
Hi Ivana,
Of course there was no mention of “imaginary wine” in documentary or in the 70’s and 80’s cuz the phony wine claim didn’t start until January 1992 when “The Grandfather of Wine” Fraud Bannister invented the fake wine claim. He thought he was going to get sued for medical malpractice after reading the First Edition of Electric Gypsy when he was mentioned in the book for not performing a trecheotomy on Jimi Hendrix. So, Bannister made up a phony story so he couldn’t be accused. Interesting enough during this same exact time, Fraud Bannister was going through an investigation for fraudulent conduct as a doctor and medical malpractice. He later went to court and was convicted for 3 counts of fraud as well a medical malpractice and lost his medical license for life 3 months later. This is the fraud Buster uses for his hoax, a fraud doctor who has no evidence for his bogus claims and he changed his phony stories through the years. After Fraud Bannister made up his phony story, other fraudsters added to the fake wine claim with their own ridiculous “murder tale” even accusing Jimi’s former manager Mike Jeffery of killing Jimi with absolutely no evidence to prove except for tall outrageous tales. These same people who had all these “outrageous stories” decades later, never said a peep in the 70’s or 80’s about it cuz it never happened. They just used their “outrageous stories” as a hook for their useless book to make money. They are fraudsters.
Kathy’s investigation turned up that Jimi died from a lethal drug overdose and it matched what St. Mary Abbotts Hospital and the medical witnesses confirmed. No phony imaginary wine was ever detected inside Jimi or witnessed at the death scene. Kathy laughs at these jokers like Buster the Clown and thinks they are total crackpots peddling false information and conspiracy theories.
Hi Jason, More like the Godfather of Wine with Bannister’s fraud and lies. LOL.
Jason is, of course, once again lying because he knows, as well as the rest of us, that due to the deliberate lies and non-investigation of the original inquiry that people simply took the word of officials and presumed Jimi went too far with his drugs and died…In 1975 Monika thought it was about to come out, so, acting like guilty people do, she panicked and tried to get ahead of it and make herself look good by admitting Jimi was murdered on Caesar’s radio show…Because the subject was under the control of a Dutch ass named Caesar Glebbeek it never got beyond that and shortly after Monika retreated to her original lies and never mentioned it again…Jason knows as well as anyone else that the trigger for Bannister revealing the wine was Kathy’s investigation that finally got all the main witnesses to speak…We actually owe Caesar a debt for his intentional dishonesty and publishing of Monika’s lies because, just like Monika’s guilty protests over Noel caused Kathy to get in the game, Caesar’s printing of Monika’s lie that Jimi could have been saved by a tracheostomy if Bannister wasn’t so negligent caused Bannister to come forward with the truth…
Here is where Jason finally gets put in his proper scummy place…His denial trolling is so unconnected to reason & reality that he forgets he himself said Jimi was dead at 4am…A person as in denial of the truth as Jason is is always going to make a mistake that exposes him, and Jason has done that here…Jason says above that Bannister lied because he was afraid of a lawsuit so he fabricated the story of the wine…However Jason is too stupid to notice he himself has claimed Jimi died at 4am and that emergency rooms don’t treat dead bodies…You can’t have it both ways, so if Jimi was that dead then Bannister had no fear of a lawsuit – unless of course dumb-ass Jason here is indirectly admitting that the doctors had no idea how long Jimi was dead so they therefore went right to work getting the wine out of his lungs…A modestly-skilled lawyer would make short work out of Jason and the court would then dump him in the appropriate sewer pit he has earned with his sick denial trolling…
To quote The Bee Gees: “It’s only words”…. and words are all Buster has for his bogus hoax today.
Again, we see no documented evidence from this serial troll. Just the usual conspiracy nonsense that’s been debunked.
Monika was a liar, who made up all kinds of stories like Buster does, so she wouldn’t be accused of Jimi’s death. It’s no surprise that Buster uses Monika’s lies for the bulk of his hoax.
Buster does what he does best, pathologically lie. I’ve never said that “Jimi died at 4am”. I said that was the time Crompton estimated that was published. I said nobody knows exactly what time Jimi Hendrix died and a 20+ year estimation doesn’t make it official or accurate. What we do know is that Hendrix was already dead for several hours confirmed by 6 professionals. Buster the Clown says Jimi “was still alive”. It’s a FACT that no doctors work on several hours long dead rotting corpses. Dr. Bob Brown, Dr. SIefert, and even Fraud Bannister admitted that nothing was done for Jimi Hendrix cuz was DEAD for several hours. Serial troll Buster ignores their testimony and continues lying with his farcical hoax.
Fraud Bannister said Jimi was cold, blue, had no circulation, rotting mouth and said “Jimi was dead for several hours” by looking at the condition of the body. Buster is an idiot who purposely ignores this damning evidence that destroys his hoax.
No doctors or hospital in the world is going to work on a dead body that is rotting. Jimi was declared dead on arrival which means he is dead. That means no work will be done on him. All 3 doctors said Jimi was dead on arrival, the media confirmed it all over the world, and Jimi’s press manager confirmed it as well.
The ambulance men and the police made clear there was no “Hendrix Murder”. Both Dr. Teare and Dr. Thurston were famous renowned doctors who worked on important murder investigations solving cases, and in their expertise they both confirmed Jimi was not “murdered”. They both concluded Jimi’s death was accidental.
Jason continues to prove my point even more for me in his non-response…This asshole Jim Hawthorn posted on Facebook that Jason was doing a good job…But anyone who looks at the trolling bullshit Jason replies with will see he never answers the point…Jason declared that Bannister made up the story about the wine because he was worried about being sued…But then in the same post Jason trolls that Jimi was a long-dead rotting corpse when Bannister received him…If you scan Jason’s trolling reply he never once answers the point that you can’t have it both ways…You can’t have Jimi not being treated because he was obviously dead and Bannister making up a wine story because he was worried about being sued in the same place…Jason has been caught making up trolling bullshit that fatally conflicts with itself that he can’t account for when challenged…A doctor doesn’t need to make up a story because he was worried about being sued with a person who was obviously long-dead…So now that Jason’s stupid excuse has been shot out of the water what does that tell us about the wine?…That perhaps it was real and that is why Seifert and Bannister treated Jimi?…Because clearing the unusual amount of wine took precedent to determining how long Jimi may have been dead?…
The next fatal conflict Jason enters is he admits Monika’s story was nothing but lies…But, typical of Jason, he omits accounting for the fact his official cause of death story that he is supporting in this thread was 100% based on Monika’s story…
Jason is a crazy piece of shit…Because of that he ignores that Crompton said the undigested grains of rice in Jimi’s stomach precluded any time of death later than 5:30am…Jason ignores that this was the time that Monika first started calling…
Because Jason is a demented troll he posts that I am claiming Jimi was alive…Any sane credible person who was actually credibly trying to understand my evidence will know I have been repeatedly saying Crompton’s time of death is fairly accurate…Jason is claiming I said Jimi was alive because he’s gas-light trolling…Jason is also dementedly ignoring that it was his source Monika who lied that Jimi was still alive at the Samarkand, not me…
Because of this fevered dementia Jason is saying Bannister was now the source for saying no treatment was done on Jimi when I myself have done a full interview with Dr Bannister where he details the half hour treatment that was recorded on the Hospital Record Jason is ignoring…
Jason is lying scum…Not only could he not answer for his stupid fuck-up above but the real explanation here is no hospital report would record a half hour treatment time for a victim who received no resuscitation attempt…This resuscitation attempt was recognized by the Inquest that registered “Resuscitation Attempt Failed” in its text, as Flyswatter deftly discovered…Jason is trolling and lying about the official record he calls for but then ignores when shown…Scotland Yard avoided interviewing Dr Bannister because it was seeking to evade his witnessing just like Jason…
If you tried this stuff in a court of law Jason you would be put in a straight jacket and arrested…
Well folks, we all know Buster is a pathological liar pushing this bogus dead hoax. He’s been caught in so many lies and changing stories we have lost count. That’s how you know it’s a hoax. Real life events never change, but Buster the Clown always changes his fake Jimi Hendrix stories when one gets debunked. Doesn’t he realize by now that we have all his lies and story changes ready to go to debunk him with?
Buster says “I’m trolling”, but we have his lying words where he claims “Jimi was still alive”. So, it’s Buster trolling using Monika as his source, cuz she said “Jimi was alive and in a coma”, which is what Buster said as well. Just more gaslighting and projecting from this serial troll. That’s why Buster gets banned from every website he goes on. So, it’s Buster who “fucked up” destroying his own hoax again. This guy never learns. He will never be able to win a debate against me cuz I use real documented evidence and he has “words”, fake stories, and debunked conspiracy theories. Here we have Buster lying to us again. He claimed Jimi was “still alive”. But Buster is a deranged liar claiming he never said it. He has mental problems. Let’s refresh his “fuzzy” memory.
BUSTER says: The reason Jimi wasn’t obviously dead was because he was put in to a partial coma paralysis by just the right borderline level of barbiturate combined with the drowning reflex from lungs full of wine.
BUSTER says: Because Jason is a demented troll he posts that I am claiming Jimi was alive…Any sane credible person who was actually credibly trying to understand my evidence will know I have been repeatedly saying Crompton’s time of death is fairly accurate…Jason is claiming I said Jimi was alive because he’s gas-light trolling…Jason is also dementedly ignoring that it was his source Monika who lied that Jimi was still alive at the Samarkand, not me…
JASON says: Hilarious!
We have Buster telling us “Jimi obviously wasn’t dead”. That means Buster is saying “Jimi was still alive”. Buster said “Jimi was alive and in a coma” which is exactly what his source Monika said.
Then Buster realized he “fucked up” so he immediately melts down and starts lying claiming he never said “Jimi was still alive”. Well, we have Buster’s lying words on record above where he did say “Jimi was still alive”. Why are you lying Buster?
Buster said “Jimi was still alive” so he can’t cite Crompton’s estimated death time anymore. He also can’t claim Jimi was “drowned to death in wine” now that Buster is claiming “Jimi was alive” when he was taken away by ambulance.
My sources are the documented media reports that confirm Jimi was pronounced dead on arrival. Both ambulance men, the police, St Mary Abbotts Hospital, Fraud Bannister, Dr. Siefert, Dr. Brown, and Les Perrin all confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival as well. Buster’s source is Monika Dannemann who said “Jimi was still alive and in a coma” and Buster posted the same exact claim above. I’ll debunk the rest of Buster’s nonsense when I have the time. BTW, “Buster” is “Flyswatter”, that’s another one of his phony alias names he uses to post with on websites. A moderator at another site confirmed it. Also, as it’s documented by Fraud Bannister, he said “any attempt to resuscitate Jimi was merely a formality”. By law, hospitals are required to document even a formality as “resuscitation attempt”. That doesn’t mean Jimi had “phony procedures” as Buster lies about since no record of these claimed “procedures”
exist.
Jimi Hendrix was dead for several hours and was not alive when he reached the hospital. Jimi was pronounced “dead on arrival’ and he had no phony “procedures” done on him. Dr. Bob Brown and Dr. Siefert are both on the record stating “nothing was done for Jimi Hendrix” cuz he was already dead for several hours as a rotting corpse. Hospitals do not work on dead corpses. No documented hospital record exists of any “procedures” for Jimi Hendrix, cuz nothing could be done for a several hour long dead drug overdose victim. What can be done? Nothing. Kathy Etchingham has confirmed it as well since she viewed all of Jimi’s death and hospital records. Kathy laughs at these jokers like Buster who makes up bogus conspiracy theories out of thin air.
So Buster, since you claim Jimi was “still alive” enroute to the hospital, when did he actually die?
Jason spends too many words failing to prove his point above…Any credible observer would have long realized Jason was a sick fucker and was trolling…Jason has succeeded in his ploy to chase all credible debate out of the room with his poisoning of the well by means of sick trolling…Anyone reading this debate will see Jason has trouble with technical evidence and responds with juvenile trash-talk and name-calling…In any case, Jason proves my point above by citing the passage where I claimed Jimi had an unusual condition of near-death that was caused by just the right dose of barbiturate combined with lungs full of alcohol-bearing fluid…This resulted in the rare condition of drug-induced coma and drowning reflex near-death that would appear as death from the outside…So in his semantics-based mockery trolling above Jason proved my point for me and showed I never claimed Jimi was alive like he was trolling…Jason is lying for reasons of taunting-trolling above and he showed that he could not produce any quote of me saying Jimi was alive after 5:30am…
To further his public losing of the debate Jason descends in to pure demented trolling in his last two paragraphs…I blame Justin for this because Jason is a sick fucker who is only here to damage the comments section with sick trolling and he has had too easy a time in doing that because of the total lack of responsible oversight of such an important topic…All Jason is doing here is admitting defeat in his own sick way…
Jason is doing this because he has been nailed by myself when I caught him saying Bannister made-up the story of the wine because he was worried about being sued for not saving Jimi…Because Jason is a sick troll who is only here to enter crazy bullshit in response to the facts I am presenting he failed to realize he was claiming Jimi had been dead for hours in the same posts where he was claiming Bannister lied about the wine because he was worried about being sued…This twisted motherfucker Jason failed to realize his offering fatally conflicted with itself because if Jimi was obviously dead then Bannister would not have to be worried about being sued…This idiot Jason riffed a little too recklessly with his crazy trolling and got burned…Jason also idiotically failed to realize that his admission that Jimi was dead for a long time fatally conflicted with Monika’s claim that Jimi was still alive…Or that the official story that he was backing originated from Monika’s story…The obnoxious juvenile inanity you see Jason respond with above is just Jason’s sick way of admitting he’s been beaten…
I think most sensible, credible people would see there’s no court that wouldn’t give me a win on Jason’s crash and burn here so there’s no further reason for me to respond…
After Buster was shown again to be the pathological liar and phony that he is, we get a vulgar comment, a fake declared “victory”, as he slinks away in defeat with his hoax blown to smithereens.
Buster lied claiming “Jimi was still alive”, after Ivana and I again, showed the facts that Jimi was a several hour long dead corpse. Buster needed an excuse for his hoax to claim Jimi “needed phony procedures”, so he made up a bullshit story of “Jimi being in a coma”. I pointed that out to Buster and he went berserk knowing he destroyed his hoax again. Now he spins another bogus tale of nonsense in a vulgar laced tirade. This is the exact reason why this serial troll gets banned from every website he goes on. I’ve defeated Buster, and he simply cannot handle it. He runs away like a coward in shame pretending he “won”. Very weak and that’s what a guy with mental problems does.
BUSTER says: I claimed Jimi had an unusual condition of near-death that was caused by just the right dose of barbiturate combined with lungs full of alcohol-bearing fluid…This resulted in the rare condition of drug-induced coma and drowning reflex near-death that would appear as death from the outside…So in his semantics-based mockery trolling above Jason proved my point for me and showed I never claimed Jimi was alive like he was trolling…Jason is lying for reasons of taunting-trolling above and he showed that he could not produce any quote of me saying Jimi was alive after 5:30am…
JASON says: All Buster makes up are phony claims and this is another one. In fact, this is the MOTHER of all phony claims.
There’s no such thing as “an unusual condition of near death caused by the right dose of barbiturate for Jimi Hendrix” where “he appered as death from the outside”.
This is a bullshit made up story by Buster. Do y’all see how deranged Buster is? He’s making up brand new fake stories, so in his own mind he can still believe Jimi Hendrix was “murdered”. He did the same thing with the barbiturate milligrams pretending to tell us Jimi needed more. This guy is a total lunatic.
Both ambulance men examined Hendrix and he was dead for hours. The police confirmed it as well, so did all 3 doctors, the hospital, the media, and Jimi’s media agent.
Buster in his deranged mind, still can’t see how badly he screwed up and is still lying about “Jimi still being alive” claiming he never said it. He just told us “Jimi was still alive” with this bogus “near death” tale he just made up.
BUSTER says: Jason proved my point for me and showed I never claimed Jimi was alive like he was trolling…Jason is lying for reasons of taunting-trolling above and he showed that he could not produce any quote of me saying Jimi was alive after 5:30am…
BUSTER says: I claimed Jimi had an unusual condition of near-death that was caused by just the right dose of barbiturate combined with lungs full of alcohol-bearing fluid…This resulted in the rare condition of drug-induced coma and drowning reflex near-death that would appear as death from the outside.
BUSTER says: The reason Jimi wasn’t obviously dead was because he was put in to a partial coma paralysis by just the right borderline level of barbiturate combined with the drowning reflex from lungs full of wine.
JASON says: LMAO. Buster is lying again. Buster is telling us in the last two quotes that “Jimi was still alive”.
Buster said “Jimi had a unusual condition of near death”….Buster is still claiming “Jimi was still alive” with this new bullshit story.
Buster said “Jimi wasn’t obviously dead”….Buster is still claiming “Jimi was still alive”.
So, I produced two quotes from this pathologically lying serial troll where he is still trying to claim “Jimi was still alive”.
BUSTER says: Jason descends in to pure demented trolling in his last two paragraphs.
JASON says: Well, here’s another lie. The London Times and major publications confirmed that Jimi Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival and Buster dismissed it. All 3 doctors confirmed it as did Jimi’s press agent. Buster has no sources except for his hoaxing words.
BUSTER says: Jason is doing this because he has been nailed by myself when I caught him saying Bannister made-up the story of the wine because he was worried about being sued for not saving Jimi…Because Jason is a sick troll who is only here to enter crazy bullshit in response to the facts I am presenting he failed to realize he was claiming Jimi had been dead for hours in the same posts where he was claiming Bannister lied about the wine because he was worried about being sued…This twisted motherfucker Jason failed to realize his offering fatally conflicted with itself because if Jimi was obviously dead then Bannister would not have to be worried about being sued…This idiot Jason riffed a little too recklessly with his crazy trolling and got burned…Jason also idiotically failed to realize that his admission that Jimi was dead for a long time fatally conflicted with Monika’s claim that Jimi was still alive…Or that the official story that he was backing originated from Monika’s story…The obnoxious juvenile inanity you see Jason respond with above is just Jason’s sick way of admitting he’s been beaten…
JASON says: Buster makes me laugh and it’s hilarious how his bogus hoax got destroyed by using a fraud doctor like Fraud Bannister as the source for his phony imaginary wine that doesn’t exist.
Buster should know that hospitals do not work on several long hour dead corpses. That’s why he changed his phony story now trying to claim “Jimi was still alive”.
Fraud Bannister should realize he screwed up and gave away his hoax with two contradicting stories.
FRAUD BANNISTER says: “On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”
FRAUD BANNISTER says: “He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of someone who had been dead for some time.”
FRAUD BANNISTER says: “Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse.”
FRAUD BANNISTER says: “The body was cold, there were no signs of circulation and my overall impression was he’d been dead for several hours.”
FRAUD BANNISTER says: “The body was cold, there we no signs of circulation and my overall impression was he’d been dead for several hours. He was completely cold. I personally think he died long before. He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of somebody who had been dead for some time.”
JASON says: Fraud Bannister admitted Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival. He also confirmed Jimi was dead for several hours. There’s no way St. Mary Abbotts Hospital would allow an emergency room doctor to perform “treatments” or “procedures” on a long dead corpse. There were no phony “treatments” done on Jimi Hendrix. Bannister admitted Jimi was “dead on arrival” just like my documented evidence confirms. Buster lied for his hoax claiming “Jimi was alive to have treatments”. That is bullshit cuz no documented medical reports of “treatments” exist. How can you “treat” a several hour long dead corpse? YOU CAN’T. That’s why Fraud Bannister is a hoaxer who lied and Buster is a serial troll who has lied for a decade pushing his deranged bogus “Hendrix Murder Hoax”.
Fraud Bannister made up the phony wine claim in January of 1992, and that was contradicted with these confirmations that Jimi was dead on arrival with no “prodecures” done. Bannister said ‘resuscitation was a formality’. Dr. Siefert and Dr. Brown said nothing was done for Jimi Hendrix.
So, Fraud Bannister debunks Buster’s lies of “Jimi was still alive in a coma”. Hendrix was dead for hours. Fraud Bannister also debunks his lies of “wine and procedures” cuz he admitted Jimi was dead for hours and it was only a “formality”.
Real documented evidence always wins out and Buster’s fraud tales are easily debunked. I relish in defeating this hoaxing clown again. Buster can never beat me cuz he has nothin’ real to use for evidence. 11 wasted years ranting like a loon making up fake claims wanting Jimi to be “murdered”. What a nut.
Monika had told quite a few lies over the years like being engaged to Jimi, he was poisoned, the Mafia killed Jimi, Devon slipped him an overdose, accusing the doctors and ambulance officers of medical negligence and she tried to help Jimi by pouring wine into him. Monika tried to put the blame onto others because she gave Jimi her pills and he died as a result of taking them. She did very little to assist Jimi instead of calling for the ambulance she rang around for help instead and the ambulance arrived after 11am. Jimi was long gone by then. She then concocted the story that she took a tablet herself and woke up around 9am to find Jimi covered in vomit but still breathing next to her in bed. The ambulance officers found Jimi covered in dry vomit and fully clothed on top of the bed dead for number of hours. 😏
What makes me laugh more than anything is this alleged coverup concerning Jimi’s death. None of the medical personnel knew who Jimi was to them he was just another overdose victim. Can you imagine someone contacting all the personnel and telling them to be quiet about Jimi’s supposed “murder”. How ridiculous can you get? This conspiracy story is so far fetched that it doesn’t even warrant giving it a second thought. Better sticking to the facts.
Continually citing someone with a less than honourable reputation like Dr. Bannister is pretty stupid and believing anything this man has said is equally dumb. Buster keeps referring to Bannister because without him Buster has no case or story. Like Jason has said many times the wine story came into play in the early 90’s but was absent from the official record in the 70’s. It’s pretty obvious this wine story was invented years later and added to the Jimi Hendrix story. Buster has an issue with Jim Hawthorn from Crosstown Torrents because he was banned from this site because of what his posts contained namely misinformation.
We owe Kathy Etchingham a great deal for bringing to light some of the issues surrounding Jimi’s death. She interviewed most of the people involved that morning and we got to hear their story. Kathy also defended Jimi when he was portrayed negatively in print and on film.
Hi Ivana,
We certainly do owe Kathy a lot and to the late Bob Levine too. Their evidence stands forever to debunk the fraudsters and the hoaxers who try to make up ridiculous stories of Jimi being “murdered” with imaginary wine.
Speaking of hoaxers, have you seen Buster’s new hilarious Jimi Hendrix claim that he just made up himself of how Jimi was “still alive” but only “appeared dead” to the ambulance men and the police? I knew Buster is desperate, but this one takes the cake of the worst claims of all time. Jimi was magical man who could tolerate any amount of barbiturates to only die from an imaginary wine drowning and only “appears dead” to people but “still is alive”. Buster is a certified lunatic.
BUSTER says: I claimed Jimi had an unusual condition of near-death that was caused by just the right dose of barbiturate combined with lungs full of alcohol-bearing fluid…This resulted in the rare condition of drug-induced coma and drowning reflex near-death that would appear as death from the outside.
Hi Jason, This means that these experienced medical professionals couldn’t tell the difference between someone who’s alive or dead. Could Buster’s rants get anymore ridiculous. I’m still laughing.🤣
Fraud Bannister said Jimi “was dead on arrival” where he estimated Jimi was dead for “several hours” based on the condition of his body. So, how can Fraud Bannister later claim he was doing “life saving procedures” on a several hour long dead rotting corpse? Bannister got caught in a fatal contradiction exposing himself as a fraud once again. This is the reason he was convicted for 3 counts of fraud losing his medical license for life. This fraud will make up any fake bogus claim.
More mumbo jumbo coming from Dr. Fraud Bannister.
The Aleem twins are just another two who explained Jimi’s death with the Alpha Jerk then changed to murder later on. More fraudulent information.
Another phony story from the Aleem’s. They claimed they had a “story to tell” but waited over 40 years to write it in a book to make money. When you ask why didn’t they go to the authorities right away “Buster” start making up bogus excuses as to why they couldn’t.
If you suspected your best friend was “murdered”, would you try to get justice for them right then or would you wait until 40 years later to write the “story” in a book hoping to make money? Both are a couple of fraudsters trying to make money off Jimi Hendrix. The living Aleem sued Janie Hendrix trying to steal Jimi’s guitars.
These fraudsters who tell these phony “murder” tales are all unknowns looking for money and publicity. Every well known person says these “murder” claims are bullshit, in which indeed they are.
If Jimi was “drowned to death” in wine, he would automatically be dead from alcohol poisoning and forced liquid. There wouldn’t be any vomit or evidence of a drug overdose inside his body from the autopsy results. A drug overdose and a “drowning” two completely different types of deaths. Famous renowned medical examiners like Dr. Teare and Dr. Thurston would easily detect the difference. There was no wine detected on the bed by the ambulance men or the police. Hoaxers like Buster the Clown know that, so they have to make up bogus stories to claim imaginary wine that doesn’t exist.
When you have a drug overdose confirmation by the ambulance men, the police, St. Mary Abbotts Hospital, the doctors, the media, the coroner, and the top medical examiner you can’t get very far with a bogus “wine hoax” cuz you have no evidence to counter real medical science and documents. Hoaxers like “Buster” just tell you phony stories saying “this is how it happened” without producing one single shred of evidence.
Exactly Jason, This is why this story is a complete hoax. Once these fraudsters have been cornered they counter their previous lies with even more outrageous ones.
All these people who claim they had a close association/relationship with Jimi just so they could get some recognition, attention and publicity-Bannister, Wright, Aleem Twins, Monika, Sharon Lawrence, and I’m sure there are others.
And Buster had told his fair share of new outrageous tales after his original lies were exposed. That’s why he becomes so angry and wanted us banned so he could keep his hoax going. His profanity laced posts tells you all you need to know that he knew it was over for him. What’s funny is that he was narrating his tale like he was observing all the different lies he was making up.
Buster claims Jimi was both still alive and dead at the same time, needed thousands of more milligrams of barbiturates to die, the wine was still there even though nobody saw it, wine magically appeared on Jimi at the hospital, the doctors automatically knew his lungs “were full of wine” just by looking at him, performing weird procedures on a several hour long dead corpse, dumped out all the wine and making no documented record of it, Thurston knew about the imaginary wine but covered it up only to tell an obscure reporter exposing the whole plot, everybody is involved in a “cover up” to this very day. What a farce this whole caper is. Oh yeah, Buster just claimed Jimi had “just right amount” of barbiturates and alcohol to “appear dead” to everyone but really wasn’t. Buster is a lunatic doing whatever he can to make Jimi “murdered”. I personally think he’s trying to make money off this Hendrix “murder’ hoax.
Sharon Lawrence was merely an acquaintance of Jimi and she pretended that she was a “close confidant” by making up phony stories. Her fiction book is littered with fake stories, quotes, and claims. Her actual real material is very thin just like it would be if you were writing about an acquaintance. Also, Tappy “the fraud” Wright wasn’t really involved with Hendrix.
Hi Jason, I’m not sure who Buster is trying to convince exactly since we don’t believe a word he says. He can rant on all he wants but it’s falling on deaf ears.
Janie Hendrix didn’t feel the need to accuse anyone if anything she said no-one was to blame for Jimi’s death.
I saw where Buster was posting under his pseudonym “Albert Doyle” using Monika’s and Sharon Lawrence’s lies followed up by Fraud Bannister’s phony tales of imaginary wine. Buster has changed his stories for his hoax since then but it’s the same usual nonsense from him. Funny thing is that it said “Banned” under Albert Doyle. So, it’s another site he was kicked out of for serial trolling.
Hi Jason, Buster or whatever his name is, is a serial internet troll spreading his lies wherever he can. He doesn’t last long anywhere because people get fed up with his trivial nonsense. He hides behind various pseudonyms to make it look like he has some sort of support but anyone who reads his stuff can easily work out that it’s the same person doing the posting.
Hi Ivana,
Yes, “Buster” is a long time serial troll. If you look under the comments section on sites with articles on Hendrix, you’ll find “Buster” posting with some alias name pushing his “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax”. He writes phony Amazon book reviews with various aliases on different Jimi Hendrix books. “Brian Doyle”, “Albert Doyle”, “Ralph Yates”, “J. Stevenson”, etc are some of the ones he uses.
I’m glad we managed to expose this guy for the fraud that he is.
Hi Jason, You’re got to read Will The Real Albert Doyle Please Stand Up over at Reopenkennedycase, I think it’s about our ‘friend’ Buster.
“The real Albert Doyle”? Ok, I will check that out. “Albert Doyle” is Buster’s alias.
Hi Ivana,
I was finally able to find that site and that sounds exactly like our ‘friend’ Buster.
Used the pseudonym “Albert Doyle” at the Deep Politics Forum.
Posts comments under the pseudonyms “Ralph Yates” and “Albert Doyle” on Amazon.
Posts comments on Jimi Hendrix.
The person who wrote the post has a perfect description of our ‘friend’ Buster.
It said he is using the Amazon account of a dead man named Albert Doyle? I didn’t get that part. Isn’t Buster’s name Brian?
Perfect description of Buster right down to a T. Read this.
“Will The Real Albert Doyle Please Stand Up?”
“Doyle is a man who continuously mixes up “truth” and “facts” and is odd within the research community because I have not once witnessed him enter into ANY collaborative research with ANYONE. This guy will start with an opinion or, within his psyche, the “truth” of an issue, and then pitches very selective evidence in a very aggressive debating style to try and bolster his individual “truth.” What you will never get from Doyle is the full picture. Nothing more than a cherry-picker extraordinaire he will steadfast refuse to deal with ANYTHING that contradicts his perspective. And here’s the funny bit – – he will then accuse you of doing the thing that he himself does.
Years ago I labeled him nothing more that a fantasist with some sort of obsessive-compulsive problem who craved attention. These days I’m not so sure. On a platform such as Amazon.com I’m sure digging out individuals with pretty controversial opinions and beliefs will be of benefit to certain interested parties. What better way than to have a reviewer support some of these views and wait for the bait to be taken? So I’m now left with a question.
Who is Albert Doyle?
If anybody can send me the name of any other single human being within this community who has met this man I would be incredibly grateful. I now have doubts that he actually exists. I propose that Albert Doyle is a game-player. What the stakes are in his games are anyone’s guess but until we get to the bottom of a very specific issue then I proclaim that Albert Doyle be genuinely outed as an imposter.
Greg started a thread here yesterday describing how his review of John Armstrong’s book at Amazon.com had been left a comment from an Amazon.com member named Ralph Yates. I went and visited the page and read the comment left behind like a skid-mark in a fresh pair of white underpants. The pseudonym Ralph Yates writing over at Amazon.com is our very own Albert Doyle. And in addition to having an account in the name of Ralph Yates he also has an Amazon.com account in the name of Albert Doyle.”
Hi Jason, Our ‘friend’ Buster is a massive fraud with a reputation to match. This description of Buster is spot on. I have a feeling all the pseudonyms he uses are fake with none of them his real name.
A massive fraud, indeed he is. Was reading more about him on that site and he isn’t too popular with any of the members. It appears Buster aka “Albert Doyle” is pulling the same kind of hoax for political history with Kennedy. People there were calling him a troll and were laughing at him for posting bogus claims. Several pages worth too. Check it out Ivana, you will have a good laugh.
Hi Jason, I’m still laughing. You would think our ‘friend’ would understand that no-one believes a thing he says on these sites; he never lasts long on any of them because the posters there can smell a rat. There are some really discerning people who had the good sense to oust him.
Dr. Nicholas Page, Kathy Etchingham’s husband, said that Jimi had 18 times the recommended dose of Vesparax in his system “enough to kill a horse”.
Ivana, can we trust Dr. Nicholas Page when the “world’s foremost authority” on Jimi Hendrix and the “world’s most famous medical expert” Dr. Albert Doyle “Buster” Yates says Jimi could tolerate 4000mg of Vesparax (equals 72 barbiturate pills) and still not still not die? Albert Doyle’s Three Stooges medical degree from the fan club gift set has to count for something, right? LOL
Hi Jason, Good one! Dr. Albert Doyle or what’s his name counters everything with there was a coverup when he can’t explain something which is always. 😁
The 50 year “cover up” is still going strong haha
Albert “Buster” Doyle said Dr. Thurston was “brought in” on the “cover up” but Thurston exposed the cover up to an obscure reporter who didn’t even bother to report the biggest story of his life.
Buster tells the most asinine stories.
George Floyd is actually a good comparison to Jimi’s death…Turns out George had 11 nanograms per ml of Fentanyl in his blood (a dangerous synthetic opiate 50 times more potent than heroin)…Lethal Dose can occur with as little as 7ng/ml in situations of poly-substance abuse…Obviously George was a regular user which meant he had a tolerance…This is obviously true since George can be seen lucid and walking around…Like Jimi, the drug in his system did not kill him…It was his being asphyxiated by people determined to do so that killed him…And the evidence for it was hard to detect and easily covered-up…
George Floyd and his manner of death is a direct analogy to Jimi and shows how autopsy drug levels can be irrelevant to cause of death if the circumstances and drug tolerances are ignored…Assholes will say “11 nanograms…Well obviously he overdosed because as little as 7 nanograms of Fentanyl can kill you”…That 11 to 7 ng ratio in Floyd extrapolates to 3000mg to 2000mg in Jimi and proves that 9 pills was not nearly enough to cause overdose in a person with a known tolerance…This will probably fly right over the heads of idiot trolls…
Dr. Albert Doyle “Buster” Yates, are you still making up phony milligrams for Jimi Hendrix?
Comparing George Floyd to Jimi Hendrix is absurd. Jimi Hendrix took 9 Vesparax pills which is equivalent to 35 barbiturates that caused a fatal overdose. No human can swallow 35 pills in one setting and still live to talk about it.
No matter how hard you continue to try, medical science will always debunk the garbage you peddle.
Hi Jason, Buster is at it again. His stupid reasoning comparing George’s death with that of Jimi Hendrix when the two have no relationship to the other or are connected in any way.
I can’t believe the above analogy; poor George died as a result of having a knee on his neck for several minutes and his protest of not being able to breath ignored by police officers. This action caused George’s death. The drugs are totally irrelevant in George’s case. On the other hand Jimi had been out and about in London socialising with various people enjoying himself and then returning to a Notting Hill Hotel where he willingly took Monika’s Vesparax the high dosage directly causing his death as determined by Dr. Teare and stated on the autopsy report.
Ivana is publicly avoiding what I wrote…She’s avoiding answering the fact Jimi was also suffocated by murderers who used drowning with wine instead of a knee on the neck…Floyd had his murder video-ed…Jimi did not…
Ivana is publicly dodging answering what I wrote specifically…That is that Floyd had an 11 nanogram blood level of Fentanyl…Any simple studying of Fentanyl will show Lethal Dose can happen at only 7 nanograms, which proves tolerance is a serious factor in overdoses…Ivana is playing dumb and skipping answering this because she knows it proves that overdose is not a straight formula…It proves that even though 7 nanograms of Fentanyl can kill, a person can be walking around and functional like George Floyd obviously was while having 11 nanograms in his blood…
What Ivana is flagrantly dodging here is the fact that 7 nanograms of Fentanyl is analogous to 9 or 10 Vesparax…As is Floyd’s 11 nanogram blood count analogous to Jimi not overdosing because of his tolerance…
Sorry Dr. Albert Doyle “Buster” Yates, there wasn’t imaginary wine involved in Jimi Hendrix’s death. No wine was detected at the flat and no medical records or autopsy report detected wine. Tappy “the fraud’ Wright made up the fake murder by wine story.
Jimi Hendrix suffocated on his own vomit due to a drug overdose. There would be no vomit if “murderers” were guzzling wine down his throat. He would be dead from the liquid alcohol. This would be a completely different death. Once again, facts and medical science debunks your bullshit conspiracies.
Your reasoning is just turning George’s death into a trivial matter. Jimi’s death, while sad, did not cause mass rioting on the streets nor did it highlight the prejudice faced by black people on a daily basis. Jimi was a wealthy rock superstar who lived life to the full travelling the world, staying in the best hotels and houses surrounded by equally well known and wealthy people. Jimi was not murdered whereas George was; the drugs in George’s system are totally irrelevant to the cause of death. The comparison you make between George’s life and death with that of Jimi Hendrix is ridiculous and distasteful. My wish is for this thread to pull the plug on your idiotic accounts. ☹️
Hi Ivana,
Our ‘friend’ took a few days off to come up with a new bogus conspiracy. Now he is comparing George Floyd to Jimi? He’s still trying to say Jimi “didn’t have enough drugs”. This clown will always push his lies making up new conspiracies. Buster is banned from every site on the internet cuz he is a deranged serial troll.
Hi Jason, I didn’t realise Dr. Albert Buster Doyle had a degree in pathology as well as medicine no doubt from the same Three Stooges School of Medicine. LOL.
If Jimi had the high level of wine that Bannister talked about then this wouldn’t have escaped Dr. Teare’s autopsy report. The only mention of wine was the level in Jimi’s blood and urine. There’s no mention of alcohol having contributed to Jimi’s death on the death certificate.
Jimi Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbotts Hospital. Shortly after, the hospital spokesman with Dr. Bob Brown standing in front of the media explicitly stated “Jimi Hendrix died from an overdose of drugs”. They never mentioned anything about a “wine drowning” or an alcohol related death. If there was this “massive wine drowning” as our serial troll Albert Doyle “Buster” Yates claims, then the hospital would have announced that to the media.
Wine was not witnessed by both ambulance men. The police and the coroner’s officers never saw wine or saw any evidence of a phony “murder”.
Banned serial troll Albert Doyle “Buster” Yates wants to claim Jimi was “drowned” in all this wine and had “fake prodecures” performed on him. I say show me the hospital report that shows all this wine and these “procedures”. Show me the autopsy report that shows massive amounts of alcohol absorbed in Jimi’s tissues, his lungs, and stomach. Wine does not disappear, it would be detected in the forensic analysis of Jimi’s body as it would be absorbed inside his body.
Serial troll Albert Doyle “Buster” Yates can’t produce this “evidence” cuz it never happened on 9-18-70. These are all made up after the fact phony claims after 1992. That’s why there isn’t evidence of these fake claims. You can’t produce evidence for something that never happened. All we get from troll Buster his own fake version of bullshit stories originated from hoaxer Tappy “The Fraud” Wright.
Not one hospital medical record exists of imaginary wine or fake procedures. Not one autopsy report shows massive amounts of wine. The only wine that was detected was the wine Jimi drank on his own during the evening.
Fake stories and claims can never outweigh documented medical science and the real facts from 50 years ago.
Jason is, of course, entering a lie here…He cannot produce any official declaration of Jimi being dead on arrival because there wasn’t any…Jimi’s being dead on arrival was from Les Perrin’s radio announcement long after they tried to save Jimi…The Hospital Report has a written entry saying death was officially declared at 12:45 after a half hour resuscitation attempt…
The claims that were made at the Hospital that Jimi died from a drug overdose were based on Monika telling them Jimi took the Vesparax…Jason has already been told this…Jason knows that no meaningful determination can be made until the autopsy but he is entering drug overdose as part of his trolling effort anyway in order to ignore the true facts…
Jason is a little dumb because Teare could not have officially declared asphyxiation on vomit unless he had consulted the emergency room doctors, since the vomit was removed by the time Teare did the autopsy…Which in turn proves Bannister and Seifert treated Jimi in order to remove that “vomit” (which turned out to be mostly wine)…Jason is a little dumb because the lack of alcohol in the blood is the forensic evidence of murder he is calling for…The blood does not absorb alcohol after death…
No Buster, I’m entering facts and I’ve already provided this information many times.
So, if you’re claiming Jimi Hendrix was not pronounced dead on arrival are you still claiming Jimi Hendrix was “still alive” enroute to the hospital?
Hi Jason, Just the plot of this conspiracy theory is childish and stupid. We are being asked to believe that Jimi was murdered by his manager and accomplice with wine. The doctors were then told to shut up about it by an unknown entity even though none of the doctors knew who Jimi Hendrix was and I’m sure they didn’t know who Michael Jeffrey was either. Who would be dumb enough to fall for a story like that?
Dr Seifert waited for Gerry Stickells to arrive at the hospital to identify Jimi’s body so he could complete the paper work and put a name to the deceased. No elaborate work was done on Jimi to revive him because he had been dead for many hours. If Jimi had been dead for a very short amount of time this would have warranted any procedures done on him. The doctors who saw Jimi brought into casualty that morning all said he had the tell tale signs of someone who had been dead for a number of hours that is why Bannister’s claims that he removed bottles full of wine from Jimi are a lie.
The whole phony conspiracy theory is ridiculous. Even after they were told it was Jimi Hendrix, they never heard of him. Michael Jeffery was unknown as well, until Tappy “The Fraud” Wright made him known by smearing his name with a fake “murder” claim. So, doctors who had no idea who they were are going to have decades of a “cover up” for a bogus theory that never happened? LOL.
Hi Jason, Buster needs to decide whether he thinks Jimi was alive or dead before he reached the hospital. He can’t have it both ways because he’s always claimed that Jimi was murdered by waterboarding back at the Samarkand Hotel by Michael Jeffrey and Monika. Buster is contradicting his own information.
Dr Teare never mentioned the brand name of the barbiturates Jimi took. Monika was not around at the hotel or hospital to be asked anything about the Vesparax the doctors in casualty and ambulance officers knew this was an overdose by looking at Jimi and the state he was in. Dr Teare did not need to consult any doctors in casualty because the autopsy he performed on Jimi clearly revealed cause of death, and importantly the dose Jimi took.
Hi Ivana,
Looks like Albert Doyle “Buster” Yates hasn’t answered my question whether he wants to claim if Jimi was dead or alive enroute to the hospital. Instead he cowardly runs and hides like ususal when he’s confronted with a question that shows how he contradicted his own hoax.
Buster just can’t let go of this resuscitation attempt to bring Jimi back from the dead even though this would have been impossible since he’d been dead for a number of hours. If Bannister cleared Jimi of all that wine then there wouldn’t have been any vomit or rice left behind and Dr. Teare’s autopsy report would have looked very different.
Hi Ivana,
That’s why I kept telling Buster even last year when he would write his long winded comments about “undigested rice” in Jimi’s stomach that he was destroying his own hoax. He was too stupid to catch on and kept it up.
If there was a medical prodecure done by Fraud Bannister of sucking out wine, then there wouldn’t be any rice found in Jimi’s stomach nor would there be any vomit left behind in his bronchi cuz Bannister would have removed all of it during the “procedure”. The rice found in Jimi’s stomach and the vomit proves there was no phony “procedure” proving both Buster and Bannister to be pathological liars. It also proves there was no phony “wine drowning” cuz the vomit and rice were found by Teare. And of course no abnormal detection of alcohol was ever detected inside Jimi’s lungs or stomach. Real medical evidence debunks fraudsters Buster and Bannister every time.
Buster has staked himself to his “phony Jimi Hendrix hospital procedure” so he has to insinuate Jimi was still alive. Jimi Hendrix was dead for several hours and all 3 doctors are on record making that statement. There was no way Jimi could have been “saved” when his body was decomposing. It is asinine to even suggest that like Buster has for a over a decade. There were no fake procedures done on Jimi and both Dr. Siefert and Dr. Brown confirmed that. So, that ultimately means there was no phony “wine drowning” and Buster was easily debunked again. He still hasn’t come back to clear up his severe contradiction of his claim of Jimi being both dead and alive before he reached the hospital. All we hear are crickets.
Hi Jason, I think what Buster is trying to do here is to convince as many people as possible that Jimi was murdered even though none of what he says is possible. No doctor is going to perform procedures on someone who died hours before in an attempt to resuscitate them. Even suggesting such a thing is stupid. The only mention of wine in the autopsy report was what was found in Jimi’s blood and urine from what he drank during the day and the rice he ate at Kameron’s party. Dr.Teare couldn’t have come up with his autopsy results of inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication if Jimi’s body had any procedures done of him in casualty that morning. Like Dr. Seifert said he pounded Jimi’s chest for a few minutes just to establish time of death and not because there was any chance of bringing Jimi back from the dead.
That’s exactly what Buster is doing as he goes from site to site pushing his hoax. Even he knows what he’s saying is bogus, cuz he makes up new fake stories all the time. Now the only question remains is why is he doing this? I’ve long suspected he is pushing this scam in order to make money off this conspiracy since there’s always some gullible sap out there who will believe in nonsense. I’ve seen bogus videos and books being sold with these conspiracies. He uses fake accounts like “Flyswatter” to agree with himself so it appears he has support for his scam. You’ve seen the sites he was banned from and was trolling so he is quite determined to convince others to believe in his garbage.
A several long hour dead body can’t be resuscitated which is why Jimi was pronounced dead on arrival. Siefert only pounded Jimi’s chest as a formality and even Fraud Bannister admitted it. So, there was no “phony procedures”. Dr. Brown never said there were procedures and neither did the hospital spokesman who told the world about Jimi’s death. The official statement was Jimi was dead on arrival from an overdose of drugs.
Fraud Bannister screwed up his fake “wine” story when he admitted Jimi was dead for several hours. How could he rush to ‘save his life’ when he said before Jimi was cold and blue with a rotting mouth from decomposing? That’s why nobody believes Fraud Bannister and why he was struck off the medical register for fraud.
Buster’s scam is easily debunked right from the start. If Jimi was “drowned in wine” then he would have been dead from liquid wine. There wouldn’t be any vomit. The wine would have been poured in him until he died. Jimi’s death is the complete opposite. He suffocated on his own vomit resulting from a drug overdose and those were the same results he found in the autopsy. Teare wouldn’t have found vomit and rice inside Jimi if he had “procedures” done by Fraud Bannister. The vomit and rice would be all gone. That’s why this whole fake story is ridiculous.
And what puts the nail in the coffin for this scam is there’s not one single shred of real evidence. Not one hospital medical record exists of these fake “procedures”. Everything in a hospital is documented and recorded from what a doctor performs. Imagine claiming Bannister extracted “bottles worth of wine” from a several hour dead body and then dumped it all out down the drain without preserving it for evidence and testing. Only a lunatic would claim that. No records exist cuz it never happened. All the fake wine claims didn’t start until until after 1992. You don’t have real evidence when it’s all made up. That’s why Buster can only rely on fake stories and phony conspiracy theories.
When Jimi booked into the Cumberland Hotel he was seeing Kirsten Nefer until she left to return to a film she was working on with George Lazenby. Jimi took up with Monika after she ran into Alvenia Bridges looking for Jimi. Despite what Monika said Jimi was not living with her at the Samarkand Hotel since he had no clothes there his belongings were at the Cumberland Hotel. The only reason Monika is mentioned is because Jimi died as a result of taking her medication and then concocting a story that she was Jimi’s fiancée who no-one believed otherwise she would have drifted off into obscurity like the rest of them.
What Jason writes is, once again, stupidly untrue…Seifert and Bannister were suctioning the wine out of Jimi’s lungs so once they finished that they didn’t need to suction his entire stomach contents…Jason is trolling so he is sloppily making up things he thinks sound good but is too stupid and too interested in only trolling and not thinking things through to realize he is only proving my case for me…If Jason bothered to accurately reflect what was actually written in the material he cites he would realize the autopsy said there was some vomitus in the small bronchi – which is the furthest in to the lung recesses…That same autopsy said there was a pint of fluid in one lung but not the other…If Jason had any intelligent interest in this instead of the demented trolling he offers he would realize that his own logic evidences a procedure being done by Bannister and Seifert because for them to have done nothing on a dead body, like Jason obnoxiously trolls, would mean there would still be vomit in that empty lung…You can’t have an official medical verdict of asphyxiation on vomit and then have the autopsy cite an empty lung…I realize I am talking to a demented moron in Jason so it would be a waste to try to educate him that the empty lung evidences medical science because they way the lungs would drain would produce one lung that emptied first from the suctioning Bannister did…I actually spoke to Bannister about this in an interview and he said the lungs are like a sponge and you can’t get it all…That’s why there was that residual amount in that one lung and why there was some minor vomitus in the small bronchi…However Jason stupidly ignores the fact that if his trolling claim that Bannister did no procedure were true then that empty lung would be full of vomit at Teare’s autopsy – therefore proving the resuscitation attempt that was recorded on the autopsy sheet Flyswatter quoted and Jason trollishly ignored…That procedure was also recorded on the Hospital Report that listed a half hour treatment time during which Bannister’s claimed suctioning of a large amount of wine was done…
Bannister is a truth-telling hero and gentleman…Jason is just sick internet scum and is obviously the pathological liar here…Jason is too stupid to realize that Seifert and Bannister were draining the lungs and not emptying the stomach…The autopsy shows once they cleared that one lung they had succeeded in clearing an airway and proceeded with ventilation…Jimi failed to respond to the resuscitation attempt that was recorded on the autopsy sheet and was declared dead…
Jason is lying when he says no abnormal detection of alcohol was found inside Jimi’s lungs because we have Bannister giving a complete description of it…Plus we have Seifert being caught lying about it in order to cover it up…And now we have case-proving evidence in the autopsy of one lung being drained and not containing any vomit (pretty dumb on Jason’s behalf)…If Jimi had choked on vomit and not been treated like Jason lies then that lung would be full of vomit – which means it is proof Bannister’s story is true and the resuscitation attempt that is listed on the autopsy sheet is backed-up by the empty lung…
You’re a real moron Jason and your trash-talk trolling replies and avoidance of honestly answering this shows why you should not be allowed to post amongst credible researchers…
Dr. Albert Doyle “Buster” Yates is back to entertain us once again with his tales of imaginary wine and phony procedures. Still not a single shred of evidence and only his hoaxing words. Buster still hasn’t answered my question.
Are you claiming Jimi was dead or “still alive” enroute to the hospital?
BUSTER says: What Jason writes is, once again, stupidly untrue…Seifert and Bannister were suctioning the wine out of Jimi’s lungs so once they finished that they didn’t need to suction his entire stomach contents…
Fraud Bannister: “The amount of wine that was over him was just extraordinary. Not only was it saturated right through his hair and shirt but his lungs and stomach were absolutely full of wine”
JASON says: Buster’s pal Fraud Bannister shot down his new phony story. This is hilarious.
Why wouldn’t they need to suction out Jimi’s entire stomach contents? Fraud Bannister said “Jimi’s stomach was absolutely full of wine”. So, if they “didn’t need to suction out Jimi’s entire stomach contents” like you are now claiming, then Dr. Teare would have detected all that “stomach full of wine” during the autopsy.
Buster got BUSTED again with a brand new lie. This is what he does folks, makes up new brand fake stories and ends up debunking his old story and his entire hoax all over again.
The fact is ladies and gentlemen, there isn’t any phony imaginary wine and there was no phony procedures performed on Jimi Hendrix. Jimi was dead for several hours. Hospitals do not work on a dead corpse. St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from an overdose of drugs and was pronounced dead on arrival. Both Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown said nothing was done for Jimi Hendrix. Fraud Bannister lied about the phony wine and Buster is lying about wine and phony procedures.
The London Times 9/18/70: “Mr. Hendrix, 27, was transported to St. Mary Abbotts Hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival by the attending doctor.
A hospital spokesperson told the large group of press: “We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
“I did locum jobs at five or six different little hospitals while I was there. One of them was St. Mary Abbots Hospital, and I was working there when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead. Straight away, I knew who he was, but there was nothing I could do for him. There were a lot of people weeping and much commotion. Poor Jimi.” – Doctor Bob Brown
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”- Fraud Bannister
JASON says: The London Times and every major media outlet around the world confirmed Jimi Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival. That’s because Jimi was dead for several hours, so when he reached the hospital he was pronounced dead. That means no phony procedures were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix.
St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed to the media Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose. Not one word about imaginary wine or fake procedures. If that actually happened, the hospital would have said so in their press conference. Jimi died from a drug overdose like the hospital confirmed.
Then we have all 3 doctors stating no phony procedures were ever performed on Jimi Hendrix. What can you do for a several hour long dead drug overdose victim? Nothing. That’s why nothing was done and no medical documents exist of fake procedures.
First, Dr. Siefert said Jimi was in the resus room and he pounded his heart twice and that was it cuz he was already dead. Siefert never said he performed “procedures on Jimi”. Buster got caught lying again.
Second, Dr. Brown said Jimi was already dead when he was brought in and he couldn’t do anything for him. Common sense tells you that. So, that’s two doctors that said nothing was done for Jimi Hendrix. Shall we make it a trifecta?
Third, in a rare moment of truth, Fraud Bannister admitted Jimi was dead on arrival and “the attempt to resuscitate him was a formality”. The formality was Dr. Siefert pounding Jimi’s heart twice and nothing more was done. So, Fraud Bannister admitted nothing was done for Jimi Hendrix just like Siefert and Brown said. So, Fraud Bannister ends up contradicting his bogus stories of fake wine and procedures when he admitted the truth that nothing was done for Jimi.
BUSTER says: therefore proving the resuscitation attempt that was recorded on the autopsy sheet Flyswatter quoted and Jason trollishly ignored…That procedure was also recorded on the Hospital Report that listed a half hour treatment time during which Bannister’s claimed suctioning of a large amount of wine was done…
JASON says: First of all, Buster is “Flyswatter”. That’s his other alias trolling account.
Second, there is nothing recorded on any “autopsy sheet” for “treatments” done on Jimi Hendrix. All 3 doctors said there was no “resuscitation attempt” performed on Jimi Hendrix. It was only a formality. Jimi was hooked up to the monitor and it was flat cuz he was dead for several hours. Siefert as a formality, pounded Jimi’s heart twice and that was is it. That was the “resuscitation attempt”. By law, hospitals have to record that as an attempt even in formality. I’ve told this serial troll Buster that many times. Hospitals document everything. There was no “phony procedures” cuz there is no medical report of it ever happening. It has to be recorded. Buster can’t produce any documents cuz it’s a hoax. All Buster can do is argue nonsense cuz he has nothin’.
Third, there is nothing documented about “suctioning large amounts of wine”.
Fourth, Jimi was a several hour long dead decomposing corpse from a drug overdose. There was nothing to “treat”.
Fifth, all 3 doctors said there was nothing done for Jimi Hendrix.
Sixth, Kathy Etchingham read every single hospital document and autopsy report. There was nothing documented about phony “treatments”, “procedures” or “large amounts of wine”. She said these bogus wine claims are all “bullshit’.
Seventh, Buster is full of shit as always and has been thoroughly debunked once again. Lord only knows how long this crazy loon is going to keep this farce going.
Hi Jason, Buster isn’t interested in the truth just like any other conspiracy theorist.
Hi Ivana,
Serial troll Buster igores the truth cuz it destroys his hoax and he peddles fiction instead. Did you see how he changed fake story on us with a new one?
The ambulance officers said Jimi looked as if he’d been dead for a while of drugs, Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown said the same thing. The announcement made at the hospital was that Jimi died as a result of a drugs overdose even before the autopsy was conducted there was never mention of wine as having caused Jimi’s death not before the autopsy or after nor at the inquest. There is no mention of wine on the death certificate because wine had nothing to do with Jimi’s death. Jimi’s death was caused by inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication. To attribute any credibility to Bannister as a source of reliable and trustworthy information is truly stupid.
I’d like to know if Jimi took the Vesparax with wine or water. Monika said she bought two bottles of wine to have over dinner but this could well be a lie since Terry Slater observed their was no food or evidence that any had been cooked at the Samarkand Hotel. I suppose this can’t be determined.
BUSTER says: You’re a real moron Jason and your trash-talk trolling replies and avoidance of honestly answering this shows why you should not be allowed to post amongst credible researchers…
JASON says: Credible researcher? Now that’s a laugh. There’s nothing credible about you. You’re as phony as a 3 dollar bill. For over a decade, you’ve bounced from site to site posting conspiracy crap and your own made up lies about Jimi Hendrix getting banned from every website along the way. You use alternate accounts with alias names to perpetrate your hoax. You are no “researcher”. You are a hoaxer. You’ve read a couple of conspiracy theory books and envisioned this deranged scenario you made up for Jimi’s death and you think that qualifies you as an “expert”. Everything you tried to peddle I’ve thoroughly debunked with expert witness accounts, documented facts, and medical science.
BUSTER says: Bannister is a truth-telling hero and gentleman…
JASON says: Fraud Bannister is a disgraced ex doctor who was convicted for 3 counts of fraud and medical malpractice. He lost his medical license for life. Even worse than that, he made up a ridiculous tale of imaginary wine and phony procedures for Jimi Hendrix making a mockery of the man’s legacy. Bannister is known as a con artist who debunked his own phony wine story just like you have.
“The derangement continues in this next episode with serial troll “Buster” as he debunks his new lies with his old lies.”
BUSTER says: Jason is just sick internet scum and is obviously the pathological liar here…Jason is too stupid to realize that Seifert and Bannister were draining the lungs and not emptying the stomach…
JASON says: Way too funny. Buster is a serial troll and pathological liar who is too stupid to realize what he told us before with his fake wine stories. Now he’s debunked himself again. LOL.
Buster is now claiming that “Siefert and Bannister were draining the lungs but not emptying the stomach” when he told us before the stomach was emptied. Check out these beauties from Buster.
BUSTER says: August 23, 2019
Bannister told me in person that it took him and Dr Siefert 20 minutes to suction the wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach before they could even attempt resuscitation…
BUSTER says: July 21, 2020
Seifert and Bannister were suctioning the wine out of Jimi’s lungs so once they finished that they didn’t need to suction his entire stomach contents…
BUSTER says: July 21, 2020
Jason is too stupid to realize that Seifert and Bannister were draining the lungs and not emptying the stomach…
JASON says: So, in August of 2019 Buster said Siefert and Bannister suctioned wine from both Jimi’s lungs and stomach.
Yesterday, almost a year later, Buster changed his fake story again on us and said Jimi’s stomach was not drained.
Well, which is it Buster? Was Jimi’s stomach drained or not drained? You can’t have it both ways!
This whole wine drowning story is just stupid. Michael Jeffrey was lying in wait back at the Samarkand for Jimi to arrive with Monika. They then held Jimi down in order to shove 9 sleeping pills and pour wine into him. Can you imagine the massive effort it would have taken by both these two to restrain Jimi and get him to swallow all those pills and wine. Monika was of a petite build and Michael was no body builder Jimi would have easily broken free and spat the pills and wine out. Dr Teare found no evidence of violence associated with Jimi’s death. All that pressure would have caused some damage or bruising to the mouth and throat.
I’m laughing at this Ivana cuz this whole fictional scene sounds so ridiculous. Besides that, the pills wouldn’t even have taken effect cuz Jimi would have died from being drowned and the pills never would have absorbed into his system. There would be no vomit. A dead man can’t vomit.
Jimi would have fought off his assailants and there would have been signs of a struggle and violence. The autopsy ruled out foul play and “murder”.
Tappy ‘The Fraud” Wright claimed in his fake story that pills were shoved in Jimi’s mouth and wine poured down his throat. That means Jimi would have fought for his life. Can’t believe anybody would believe this stupid story.
It’s been a whole year since I’ve posted here. How many fake stories did Buster change? LOL
Buster was on fire yesterday destroying his phony “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax” with his own words. Should we give this guy a medal?
BUSTER says: Jason is trolling so he is sloppily making up things he thinks sound good.
JASON says: Buster always does a good job of making me laugh. He’s projecting again which he does quite often. I post real facts, documented sources, medical evidence, credible witness testimony, that proves Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose. Buster is the sloppy troll who changes one fake story to the next when one gets debunked. Buster’s phony stories are abusrd which is why nobody takes them seriously. Here’s more sloppy trolling from Buster as he proves my point for me debunking his own hoax again. Absolutely Hilarious!
BUSTER says: I actually spoke to Bannister about this in an interview and he said the lungs are like a sponge and you can’t get it all.
JASON says: “The lungs are like a sponge” he says. LMAO!
Well, what the hell do you think I’ve been trying to tell you? You and Fraud Bannister claimed Jimi was filled up full of wine from his stomach to up to his throat. All that wine you claim was inside Jimi would not magically disappear. The lungs and tissues would soak it up like a sponge. So, when Dr. Teare did his forensic analysis of Jimi’s lungs and stomach, all that abnormal wine would be detected as it was soaked up in his his lungs, tissues, and stomach lining. No abnormal wine was found cuz there never was any wine in 1970. It was only an overdose of barbiturates that was detected in the autopsy. Bannister made his fake wine claim in 1992 which is why there is no evidence for the bullshit he made up. Damn you’re stupid, and you debunked yourself and Fraud Bannister once again. Thanks!
The rice detected by Dr. Teare kills your hoax cuz if Jimi’s stomach was sucked dry, as you previously claimed before, then there wouldn’t be any rice in Jimi’s stomach of that magnitude. Fraud Bannister would have sucked it out. A partial eaten rice meal was found. If all that wine you and Fraud Bannister claimed was there that large amount of rice wouldn’t be left over. The rice proves there was never any wine or phony “procedures” done by Fraud Bannister.
Now your new fake story makes it even worse for you. I know you’re in a quandary, but what the hell were you thinking posting that? You really destroyed your hoax.
You’re now claiming Jimi’s stomach was full of wine, but Fraud Bannister didn’t suck it out of his stomach, so you can now claim the rice was left behind after your last fake story blew up in your face. The problem with this new fake story is, if Bannister didn’t suck the wine out of Jimi’s stomach then Dr. Teare would have found all that wine when he opened up Jimi’s stomach for the autopsy. Teare found no massive amount of wine in Jimi’s stomach, only rice.
So. you’re damned if you do and you’re damned if you don’t. You’re new fake story was terrible Buster and you blew up both fake claims and your entire hoax again. I have to hand it to you, seems you try really hard but you’re not very good at hoaxing cuz you ruin all your fake claims. Try harder next time, but you really should throw in the towel and hang up your spurs and look for a new hobby. No matter what you try to claim I will always debunk you. You can never defeat me Buster.
Jason is stupid and he’s also ignorant of the material…If he was more familiar with Dr Bannister and his statements Jason would realize that Bannister said “Every time we finished draining the lungs they would re-fill from the stomach”…Jason is a moron because even though he has had it spelled out for him he still ignores it and enters trolling stupidity…The job of Bannister and Seifert was to clear the lungs to establish an airway for resuscitation…Because Jason is only interested in tangling the thread in trolling stupidity he is avoiding recognizing that Bannister and Seifert were not going to waste time fighting to get oxygen to Jimi’s lungs by suctioning the stomach…As the autopsy showed the doctors cleared one lung and then tried resuscitation…
Jason is a sick troll so he is trying to get me to take the bait of his trolling taunts that I said Jimi was alive and that Bannister suctioned the stomach…Those false claims are a trolling tactic designed to get me to answer them instead of Jason responding to the evidence I explained…If you look at Jason’s trolling posts he never acknowledged or answered the fact that one lung was drained as Teare noted…Jason dodged answering the fact that this PROVED that the doctors did a procedure on Jimi because there was no vomit in that lung…If Jimi choked on vomit and no procedure was done, as Jason trolled, then that lung would be full of vomit…The way suctioning works is one lung will drain first and that was the lung Teare described as being empty…This proves the doctors drained wine from Jimi’s lungs because obviously once Bannister and Seifert finally got that lung cleared they went right to resuscitation…The stomach was never suctioned because the doctors knew they had no time to waste doing an unnecessary procedure when time was of the essence and oxygen needed to be gotten to the lungs…The stomach was never touched…The suctioning stopped when the stomach no longer sent wine to the lungs so it still contained the rice…Jason’s claim that the rice in the stomach proves no procedure was done is stupid and based on his trolling ignorance of the evidence and medical procedures…
Jason is a sick person and in all his trolling blather above never does he once address the point I made that Jimi could not have been claimed to have choked on vomit and have that empty lung without a resuscitation attempt that cleared it…Jason flagrantly dodges this point and tries to divert to more trolling bullshit but the obvious reason he avoids it is because he knows it is fatal to his lies and he can’t answer it…Jason avoids answering how Teare proved the vomit went all the way to the full extent of the lungs in the small bronchi, which proves Jimi’s lungs were full, while the autopsy showed that lung was empty…If Jason had more intelligent awareness he would realize dry choking on vomit could not deliver vomit all the way to the small bronchi and for vomit to penetrate that far in to the lungs would require transportation by fluids – which in turn forensically evidences the wine…Because Jason concentrates on obnoxious trolling instead of intelligent analysis he doesn’t realize he has been totally demolished by these arguments, whether he trolls them and doesn’t answer their evidentiary brilliance or not…
When Jason refused to answer the basic point of how could vomitus be in the small bronchi, and the lung be empty at autopsy, without there being a suctioning in between he lost the debate…Jim Hawthorn said Jason was doing a good job but I see that lying British scumbag doesn’t come in and answer this…
More nonsense from Buster as he spins his bogus tale of fake wine and resuscitation again.
Serial troll Buster makes up fake stories while I posted Jimi’s death account from The London Times and all 3 attending doctors who gave testimony. All 3 doctors and The Times said Jimi was dead on arrival. Does Buster think he can ignore this fact and peddle his bullshit of Jimi still being alive? Jimi was dead and did not have any fake procedures. All 3 doctors said Jimi was dead on arrival. That means NO phony procedures could be performed. Serial troll Buster runs away from evidence that destroys his hoax. Buster calls me a “troll” when I’m posting factual documented evidence and he’s posting made up crap in his deranged head without any documented evidence. Buster is a serial troll who is banned from every website he goes on for making up lies about Jimi Hendrix wanting him to be “murdered”. He is mentally off.
“Mr. Hendrix, 27, was transported to St. Mary Abbotts Hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival by the attending doctor.” – The London Times 9/18/70
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”- Dr. Fraud Bannister
“Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead. There was nothing I could do for him.”- Dr. Bob Brown
“I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.”- Dr. Martin Siefert
All 3 doctors confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival and no “phony procedures” were ever performed. How can serial troll Buster ignore this damning evidence against him? No medical reports exist of “phony procedures” cuz there never was any. Kathy Etchingham did the investigation and she said these “phony procedures” claims is a conspiracy hoax.
Buster IS claiming Jimi was still alive.
The only way doctors would perform “procedures” is if a person is alive. They aren’t going to do Frankenstein experiments on a dead corpse.
Jimi was dead for several hours. Why the hell would doctors be clearing an airway for a dead decomposing corpse? This is absurd. Buster is a fool to claim this.
There was no “procedures” performed on Jimi Hendrix. Dr. Siefert and Dr. Brown confirmed there wasn’t. No medical record exists. St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose and said nothing to the media about alcohol or “life saving procedures”. They confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival.
Buster claimed Jimi was full of red wine from his stomach up to his throat. Now he’s saying Jimi’s stomach wasn’t drained so he can claim the rice meal was still there. That means Dr. Teare would have found massive amounts of wine in Jimi’s stomach during the autopsy. No wine was found and Buster is debunked again. There was never any wine to begin with. This is a hoax.
And for a finale, if Jimi lungs were full of pure red wine like Buster claims, there would be no vomit in Jimi’s bronchi. Buster claims bottles of red wine were forced into Jimi. There would be no vomit cuz the liquid wine would have killed him. The vomit proves it was a drug overdose. All the readers are nodding their head in agreement. There can’t be vomit when Buster is claiming death by liquid wine. The vomit debunks the fake wine myth once again. Buster still can’t beat me.
Hi Jason, Buster keeps falling over his own feet. He claims Jimi was murdered back at the Samarkand Hotel by waterboarding now he’s saying Jimi was alive when he reached the hospital and this warranted procedures done on him by the doctors in casualty that morning. Buster just spins the story as it suits him with no regard for the truth. If there was any wine involved in Jimi’s death then anyone close to Jimi would have been splattered with it-Monika, Michael Jeffrey and the doctors at the hospital.
Hi Ivana,
Buster’s only goal is to claim Jimi was “murdered” by any means possible. And he doesn’t care what absurd lie he tells to make that absurd claim. We’ve both debunked the garbage he peddles, and when his story is proven false, he makes up a brand new story contradicting the last one. He’s changed his fake stories so many times I’ve lost count. He was always claiming Jimi’s stomach was suctioned out and now he claims it wasn’t. As a result, Buster debunks himself and Fraud Bannister who said he did suction out Jimi’s stomach. We all know no “phony procedures’ happened cuz Jimi was dead and the documented evidence debunks Buster’s bogus hoax.
The above is just nonsense, the trick is trying to fool people that it’s meaningful medical jargon. The truth of the matter is that Jimi died as a result of taking too many of Monika’s Vesparax back at the Samarkand Hotel. Jimi was in the process of dying from taking 18 times the recommended dosage causing him to choke because he was unable to clear the vomit; the vomit flowed back into Jimi’s system causing asphyxiation. When the ambulance was finally called Jimi was covered in dry vomit consistent with having died hours earlier to everyone involved that morning he died of a drugs overdose. Dr Teare later confirmed this with his autopsy results. No doctor is going to perform procedures in casualty on someone that is beyond help like Jimi was. One person here is pushing a very unlikely scenario bordering on myth and fantasy. This is what conspiracy theories are all about.
I’ve been reading about other well known people who have died as a result of barbiturate overdoses. Pier Angeli, Brian Epstein, Judy Garland, Marilyn Monroe, Inga Stevens and Brian Wilson.
Buster tells MANY different conspiracy theories cuz he changes his fake stories all the time.
All 3 doctors confirmed Jimi was dead. How does Buster justify Jimi “having procedures” when he was dead for several hours?
Buster said the doctors were “trying to clear an airway” for Jimi. How does clearing an airway help a man that was already pronounced dead on arrival?
Buster claimed Jimi had wine up to his throat. So, he wants us to believe doctors spent all that time sucking out wine and leaving his stomach full of wine then trying to clear an airway on a man who’s been dead for several hours that was decomposing. Buster tells the worst stories.
So Buster, was Jimi “still alive” or dead when he reached the hospital? You can’t keep running away from this question like a coward. Refusing to answer it shows the readers you’re a serial troll. No long winded denials. Just answer the question.
Jason is finished…His trolling responses above, that are based on the weakest of trolling blather, literally could not answer my proof that I posted in my last response…That wins the debate for me and I do not need to further feed the trolling of an obviously sick person who is just here for moronic nay-saying…
If Jason had any intelligent appreciation for well-argued evidence he would realize that the autopsy noted that there were minor particles of vomitus in the small bronchi…Because Jason has a moronic level of understanding of intelligent forensic discussion the fact the autopsy noted small bits of vomit in the small bronchi flies right over his head…He doesn’t notice that this forensic pattern of minor detritus in the small bronchi conforms to fluid-transported material…The fluid disperses the material and de-concentrates the vomit through liquid dilution…So what you see Teare record in the autopsy of minor bits of vomit in the small bronchi is exactly what you would see if fluid delivered those bits to the furthest extent of the lungs like fluids would do…Solid vomit cannot create such a forensic result or penetrate so far in to the lungs…Only a fluid-borne distribution could create such a result and it is proof that Jimi’s lungs were full of wine…
Again, since Jason has a retarded level of understanding of intelligent forensics he doesn’t grasp that the way the lungs drain when suctioned at hospital is one lung would empty first…Again – when Teare recorded one lung still having fluid in it and the other empty he recorded the forensic pattern of suctioning…Once Bannister and Seifert determined that lung had drained they went right to work with resuscitation and urgent introduction of oxygen to that lung…
Jason has failed to answer the forensic FACT that minor vomitus particles could not be identified in the small bronchi in a choking on vomit victim while having an empty lung…The fact specks of vomit were recorded in the small bronchi forensically evidences fluid transportation and dilution since there is no medical pathology to deliver whole vomit that deep in to the lungs…In fact, if we examined Bon Scott and John Bonham’s real choking on vomit deaths from too much drinking we would find no such particle penetration to the small bronchi, therefore confirming drowning in fluids in Jimi’s case and not theirs…This is firm proof that fluid-borne vomitus particles were delivered to the small bronchi by liquids and then removed since the lung was cited as empty at autopsy…
Jason is moronic trolling scum so he can’t touch this…That’s why it stands as proof and ends this debate…Ivana is like a cave woman who is too stupid to comprehend this brilliant science so neanderthal-style she tries to smash it with a rock…It is really Justin’s fault that these two assholes aren’t banned and I am subjected to them…
Was this Buster’s swan song with his final new crazy claims for his phony “Hendrix murder hoax”? Say it isn’t so. Buster ran away again and never answered any of my questions for an entire year. Every time you question this guy he refuses to answer, ducks the question, claims a fake ‘victory’, and scampers away like a sniveling coward. Rinse, lather, and repeat. “This could be the last time, maybe the last time, I don’t know.”
BUSTER says: Jason is finished…His trolling responses above, that are based on the weakest of trolling blather, literally could not answer my proof that I posted in my last response…That wins the debate for me and I do not need to further feed the trolling of an obviously sick person who is just here for moronic nay-saying…
JASON says: LOL. You’ve been finished since the first day you started this bogus hoax, over a decade ago. You didn’t post any proof for an entire year. You made up a bunch of nonsense claiming it was proof. I’ve posted direct statements from all 3 doctors that said “Jimi was dead on arrival” and they “did nothing done for him”. The London Times confirmed it as did St. Mary Abbott Hospital. You ignore that proof and make up your own fake “procedures” claims that never happened for your hoax. You refused to answer if you believe Jimi was alive or dead when he reached the hospital. You’re trying to claim Jimi was both dead and alive. You lost when you claimed Jimi’s stomach was “full of wine” and it was “suctioned out”. Now you claim it was left “full of wine”. As any deranged narcissist does when they are soundly defeated, they claim fake victory and run away like a coward. You’ve done this 3 times now in a year.
BUSTER says: If Jason had any intelligent appreciation for well-argued evidence he would realize that the autopsy noted that there were minor particles of vomitus in the small bronchi…Because Jason has a moronic level of understanding of intelligent forensic discussion the fact the autopsy noted small bits of vomit in the small bronchi flies right over his head…He doesn’t notice that this forensic pattern of minor detritus in the small bronchi conforms to fluid-transported material…The fluid disperses the material and de-concentrates the vomit through liquid dilution…So what you see Teare record in the autopsy of minor bits of vomit in the small bronchi is exactly what you would see if fluid delivered those bits to the furthest extent of the lungs like fluids would do…Solid vomit cannot create such a forensic result or penetrate so far in to the lungs…Only a fluid-borne distribution could create such a result and it is proof that Jimi’s lungs were full of wine…
JASON says: You claim to be “the foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix” but you don’t know a damn thing about his real death. There wasn’t just “small bits of vomit” and both of his lungs were found congested from a drug overdose. There was no wine detected in Jimi’s lungs during the autopsy. If Bannister “suctioned out” Jimi’s lungs as you claim, then his lungs wouldn’t have been congested. You are claiming Jimi had several bottles of pure red wine forced down his throat. He would have died from the drowning. He would not be vomiting. That alone kills your hoax. That’s why you ran away like a coward.
BUSTER says: Again, since Jason has a retarded level of understanding of intelligent forensics he doesn’t grasp that the way the lungs drain when suctioned at hospital is one lung would empty first…Again – when Teare recorded one lung still having fluid in it and the other empty he recorded the forensic pattern of suctioning…Once Bannister and Seifert determined that lung had drained they went right to work with resuscitation and urgent introduction of oxygen to that lung…
JASON says: Wow, we are getting some new wild stories from Buster. Dr. Teare never documented anything about Jimi’s lung being “suctioned” beforehand. FYI, both of Jimi’s lungs were found congested when Teare did the autopsy. How are you claiming one lung was full and the other one was empty?
What’s a “forensic pattern of suctioning”? That’s a fake medical jargon term you made up. No such term exists.
Oxygen? You never claimed that one before. How does oxygen in “one lung” work on a dead decomposing corpse?
For the readers: Here is more documented evidence showing how Buster is just full of shit and a hoaxing serial troll.
Rolling Stone 10/15/70: Dr. Teare discovered both lungs were congested, and vomit was found in the smaller bronchi.
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital.” – Fraud Bannister
JASON says: Dr. Teare discovered two congested lungs as confirmed. But Buster says “one lung was empty and the other was full”. Also, there is nothing about “tiny bits” of vomit. Buster got BUSTED again lying, trolling and hoaxing.
Fraud Bannister said Jimi was dead “for hours”. Why would he “introduce oxygen” to just “one lung” when Jimi was dead and decomposing? Buster has been beaten badly and added new asinine stories for his hoax. Buster has never beaten me. This is hilarious!
BUSTER says: Jason has failed to answer the forensic FACT that minor vomitus particles could not be identified in the small bronchi in a choking on vomit victim while having an empty lung…The fact specks of vomit were recorded in the small bronchi forensically evidences fluid transportation and dilution since there is no medical pathology to deliver whole vomit that deep in to the lungs…In fact, if we examined Bon Scott and John Bonham’s real choking on vomit deaths from too much drinking we would find no such particle penetration to the small bronchi, therefore confirming drowning in fluids in Jimi’s case and not theirs…This is firm proof that fluid-borne vomitus particles were delivered to the small bronchi by liquids and then removed since the lung was cited as empty at autopsy…
JASON says: Well folks, Buster says I have “failed”. This guy always knows how to make me laugh.
Forensic fact? Jimi had two congested lungs. Those are the facts. So, one was not “empty” and there wasn’t “specks of vomit”. There’s nothing recorded on Jimi’s autopsy with your bogus made up nonsense. And you clearly don’t know anything about medical science or the human body Dr. Albert Doyle “Buster” Yates. You make up phony medical jargon and stories for your hoax.
You’re batting .1000 destroying your hoax today, Buster. John Bonham and Bon Scott died from alcohol poisoning by drinking on their own which caused vomiting. You’re claiming Jimi was forced drowned in alcohol which would not induce vomiting cuz it was being forced in him as you claim. The alcohol poured in Jimi would cause death and not induce vomiting. Alcohol poisoning would have been found in the autopsy and there was no abnormal detection of alcohol of “bottles of wine”. I keep telling you a drug overdose is a completely different death than the hoax you are peddling. There would be NO vomit if Jimi was forced drowned in wine. The vomit from the drug overdose kills your hoax.
BUSTER says: Jason is moronic trolling scum so he can’t touch this…That’s why it stands as proof and ends this debate…Ivana is like a cave woman who is too stupid to comprehend this brilliant science so neanderthal-style she tries to smash it with a rock…It is really Justin’s fault that these two assholes aren’t banned and I am subjected to them…
JASON says: Ok MC Hammer. LOL.
I’ve destroyed your hoax and Ivana has too. You look like a fool and have thoroughly embarrassed yourself making up phony claims. “Brilliant science”? What a joke. Nonsense you came up with in your deranged head is not “science”.
It’s beyond pathetic how you want Jimi Hendrix to be “murdered” as you lie and hoax your way with bullshit stories. You are tarnishing Jimi’s name and making a mockery of his death by perpetrating this hoax. What a disgrace. You should seriously check yourself into a mental institution for your own well being. You are in need of some serious mental help. No rational sane individual would even make up the crap you do believing it’s real.
Justin was cool enough to allow everybody to speak freely on this site with zero censorship. You are lucky he allowed that, otherwise you would have been banned a long time ago like you are on every site you go on for serial trolling.
Buster ran like a coward when his hoax was further destroyed and he couldn’t answer the questions that destroyed him. Buster is a clown!
As Jimi Hendrix said…..Until we meet again.
Spot on, Jason. I’m sick and tired of the nonsense Buster keeps peddling. He has a high opinion of himself that no-one shares with him. He’s a silly fool. He just can’t let go of the forced wine drowning even though it never happened with even the author admitting he made it up just to sell his dumb book. How stupid do you need to be to keep going with a debunked story.
Do you really think anyone with any intelligence would be believing what you write over what was presented by Dr.Teare on the autopsy report. Jason and I are well aware of your tactics and so are others on other threads. You are good at weaving fantastical stories about phony resuscitation attempts on someone who was long dead like Jimi and presenting mythical medical reports which are just empty verbose rants with no truth or substance to them. You repeatedly ignore the fact that Jimi died as a result of taking too many of Monika’s pills in favour of a lie written in a trashy book about Jimi being murdered by waterboarding with wine. You are a silly and confused conspiracy theorist with zero credibility that is all.
Drinking to the point where someone has passed out and then vomits as a result has the same effect has someone who has overdosed on barbiturates. If the vomit is unable to be cleared that person will choke with the vomit flowing back into the body. The difference between the two would be the alcohol level in the blood as opposed to the barbiturate level in the blood as in Jimi’s case. Jimi’s alcohol level remained low, if all that wine had been swallowed then the reading in his blood would have been excessive given that he died a number of hours before the ambulance was called. Jimi’s body would have absorbed the wine. Jimi did not die of alcohol intoxication but barbiturate intoxication nor did he suffocate to death from having wine poured all over him. He suffocated on his own vomit from the excessive barbiturate level-18 times the recommended dose. Jimi’s blood and urine alcohol reading was low in comparison to the barbiturate reading as Dr. Teare discovered during the autopsy therefore, having done a thorough investigation, he concluded that Jimi died as a result of taking too many pills.
BUSTER says: You didn’t answer the point Jason…If Bannister and Seifert did no procedure on Jimi then how was there vomit in the smaller bronchi but no vomit in the rest of the lung?…Teare’s report said there was 400ml of “free fluid” in the left lung…It was almost certainly residual wine…The left lung was partially collapsed because of the wine load that damaged it as well as the suctioning…Lungs are not meant to be filled with wine…They collapse when forced to endure that strain…The left lung being partly collapsed explains why the right lung drained…
JASON says: Buster is saying Jimi had two extensive “life saving procedures”.
1. Why would Jimi need to have “procedures”?
2. How would a “procedure” help Jimi?
3. Where is it documented on a hospital or autopsy report that Jimi’s lungs were filled full of wine?
4. Where did Dr. Teare document he found alcohol in Jimi’s lungs?
BUSTER ssys: The congestion in both lungs was probably in reaction to the wine but maybe also partly the barbiturate…Lungs that were drowned with wine would probably congest severely in reaction while the victim was still alive…No doubt the .7mg of barbiturate also caused that congestion…
JASON says: “Probably in reaction to the wine”? “Probably congest severely in reaction”? “Maybe also partly the barbiturate”? These aren’t facts. You don’t even know what you’re talking about. So, again you’re just making stuff up that never even happened. I deal with facts. You make up fiction as you go along.
BUSTER says: So you still haven’t answered the point Jason…For there to be vomitus in the smaller bronchi means there would have to be vomit in the rest of the lung since it would have to be forced in to the smaller bronchi by the vomit behind it…If you are saying Jimi got no treatment that means we should see vomit in the rest of the lung since vomit can not be in the smaller bronchi unless other vomit forced it there…
JASON says: Why would the doctors and medical staff at St. Mary Abbotts Hospital decide Jimi Hendrix was a candidate for “treatments”?
What would these “treatments” hope to accomplish?
BUSTER says: What you are stupidly not answering Jason is forensic science tells you the vomit that was in the rest of the lung was contained and mixed within the wine that was in that lung…Bannister suctioned that wine out and when he did the vomit that was in the lung went with it…Vomit remained in the smaller bronchi because those narrow passageways kept that vomit from being suctioned out…So you still haven’t answered the fact that this is forensic tracing of wine being in the lungs and suctioned out…That’s why Teare only mentioned there being vomit in the bronchi and nowhere else…If no treatment were done on Jimi then Teare would have noted vomit all through the lung…That has to be because vomit cannot get in to the smaller bronchi unless other vomit forced it there…And if no treatment were done on Jimi then that vomit would still be there and not only in the bronchi…
JASON says: So, was Jimi still alive when you claim these “treatments” were being performed?
Now that you’re talking about vomit, why did you claim Jimi was filled with 5 bottles of pure red wine from his stomach to spilling up to his throat at the Samarkand?
Hi Jason, Buster just likes the sound of his own voice. What he’s saying makes no sense at all is he now saying Jimi was alive when he reached the hospital. In that case then there was no murder back at the Samarkand Hotel. Well I’ve got news for him Jimi was DOA. Dr Teare conducted other high profile autopsies and he was well aware of celebrity excess and lifestyle.
Jason is trollishly failing to answer what I wrote and is once again answering material he can’t answer with aggressive questions designed to switch the subject…He wouldn’t be allowed to get away with that in a credibly moderated debate or venue…
The question was asked right there in public and Jason could not answer it in public and switched the subject…In the real world that constitutes a win for me and I no longer have to respond to Jason…When you walk Jason’s claim through he can’t account for the documented evidence that surrounds it…His argument was that there was no wine and no procedure done on Jimi…But when asked to walk that scenario through and account for that which conflicts with it he can’t do it and tries to switch the subject…
The question put to Jason was “How was there vomit in the small bronchi (which shows vomit was pushed to the furthest reaches of the lung) but no vomit in the main lung?”…If there was no wine then the only thing that could have pushed that vomit to the small bronchi was other vomit…And if there was no procedure then the vomit that pushed that other vomit into the small bronchi would still be there and would have been cited by Teare…The reason there was no vomit cited by Teare in the main lung is because the main lung was flooded with wine…When Bannister suctioned that wine out he suctioned the vomit suspended within it out too…That’s why there was no vomit found in the main lung…This is the exact forensic pathology you would expect with Bannister’s lungs filled with wine scenario…The reason there was vomit in the small bronchi is because it was trapped in there and the suction device couldn’t get it out…The medium that would best push vomit to full penetration of the lungs in the small bronchi would be fluids…
When Jason fails to answer this, and uncredibly trolls it instead, he loses the debate…
Sorry Buster, I’m not “trollsihly” failing to answer anything. You are. You refuse to answer for why you would think Jimi would need to have “procedures” performed on him after he was already confirmed to be dead on arrival.
You are claiming Jimi had “life saving procedures performed” on him at St. Mary Abbotts Hospital and I’m asking you legitimate questions for why he would need them. You are avoiding the main questions for your hoax.
We all know the documented evidence, the official hospital statement, doctor testimony, confirms that there were no “procedures” performed on Jimi. You are saying Jimi had these “extensive procedures” performed on him. We need to know from you why you would claim Jimi needed the “procedures” and how it could help him. You are running away again when your hoaxing stories are questioned.
Again, I’m not “switching the subject”. This IS the subject. You are claiming “extensive procedures” were perfomed on a several long hour dead corpse. We want to know why and how these “procedures” could be performed, as you claim, since there is no record of any “procedures” performed on Jimi Hendrix. Any investigative journalist would ask these questions of a person making these extraordinary claims as you are doing. Your failure to answer simple questions of your own hoax speaks volumes. You can’t answer for your own bogus claims. This is why you are just a serial troll. You make up phony stories, and when you’re questioned you attack the person, claim a phony ‘victory’, then you run away so you can avoid having to answer the tough questions. Trolling 101.
You are also claiming wine was found in Jimi’s lungs during the autopsy when you said Bannister removed all the wine beforehand. There is not one single hospital or autopsy report that documents wine in Jimi’s lungs. I asked you a question about it and you ran from it again accusing me of “switching the subject”. We need to know from you how you can claim wine was in Jimi’s lungs when Teare never found any wine during the autopsy. You also just said Bannister left Jimi’s “stomach full of wine” but Teare did not find that wine when he opened up Jimi’s stomach for the autopsy. Teare only found undigested rice. You run away from this question too. Why are you afraid to answer questions for what you are claiming? Any legitimate person would be able to easily answer questions for what they claim.
Buster needs to answer these questions for what he’s claiming.
Buster is saying Jimi had two extensive “life saving procedures”.
1. Why would Jimi need to have “procedures”?
2. How would a “procedure” help Jimi?
3. Where is it documented on a hospital or autopsy report that Jimi’s lungs were “filled full of wine”?
4. Where did Dr. Teare document he found “alcohol” in Jimi’s lungs?
5. Why would the doctors and medical staff at St. Mary Abbotts Hospital decide Jimi Hendrix was a candidate for “treatments”?
6. What would these “treatments” hope to accomplish?
7. Why did Dr. Teare not find a “stomach full of wine” when you claim Bannister left “all the wine” in Jimi’s stomach?
7. So, was Jimi still alive when you claim these “treatments” were being performed?
Buster’s continued failure to answer for his phony stories proves he is a serial troll. He makes up nonsense trying to discredit the documented evidence Ivana and myself provides. When we question his phony stories, he becomes angry, attacks us, and runs away. Only a true fraud would behave this way.
An interesting and entertaining thread but why respond to an idiot like Buster bullshit for so long when he is just trolling. Hendrix died from choking on his own sick and would have died anyway from the barbs, accidents do happen.
If you read what I’ve posted I’ve proven that the simple-minded version you are trolling was impossible and Jimi was drowned in wine…What you are posting is not true….Dr Bannister said he removed 5 bottles of wine from Jimi’s lungs and stomach at hospital…The trace blood alcohol content at autopsy proves homicide because it is forensically impossible for a person to have that much wine inside them with such a low blood alcohol level…Jason knows this which is why he tries to deny it so desperately…
I’m quite safe from assholes like Thai3 because they will never be able to find a single other case where the victim vomited profusely after taking 9 Vesparax…Thai3 can’t back up his stuff…I can…
I could destroy you in any credible debate Thai3…
Any time…
Any where…
Hi Thai3,
Buster is a serial troll and I don’t appreciate him accusing innocent people of “cover ups”, “murder”, and spreading disinformation about Jimi Hendrix.
I’ll check out the video.
Buster couldn’t “destroy” any poster. He was laughed off sites by Jimi Hendrix novices when he was posing as “Scrum Drum”.
You didn’t answer the point Jason…If Bannister and Seifert did no procedure on Jimi then how was there vomit in the smaller bronchi but no vomit in the rest of the lung?…Teare’s report said there was 400ml of “free fluid” in the left lung…It was almost certainly residual wine…The left lung was partially collapsed because of the wine load that damaged it as well as the suctioning…Lungs are not meant to be filled with wine…They collapse when forced to endure that strain…The left lung being partly collapsed explains why the right lung drained…
The congestion in both lungs was probably in reaction to the wine but maybe also partly the barbiturate…Lungs that were drowned with wine would probably congest severely in reaction while the victim was still alive…No doubt the .7mg of barbiturate also caused that congestion…
So you still haven’t answered the point Jason…For there to be vomitus in the smaller bronchi means there would have to be vomit in the rest of the lung since it would have to be forced in to the smaller bronchi by the vomit behind it…If you are saying Jimi got no treatment that means we should see vomit in the rest of the lung since vomit can not be in the smaller bronchi unless other vomit forced it there…
What you are stupidly not answering Jason is forensic science tells you the vomit that was in the rest of the lung was contained and mixed within the wine that was in that lung…Bannister suctioned that wine out and when he did the vomit that was in the lung went with it…Vomit remained in the smaller bronchi because those narrow passageways kept that vomit from being suctioned out…So you still haven’t answered the fact that this is forensic tracing of wine being in the lungs and suctioned out…That’s why Teare only mentioned there being vomit in the bronchi and nowhere else…If no treatment were done on Jimi then Teare would have noted vomit all through the lung…That has to be because vomit cannot get in to the smaller bronchi unless other vomit forced it there…And if no treatment were done on Jimi then that vomit would still be there and not only in the bronchi…
Since you avoided honestly answering this you lose…
Congestion came from the drug overdose and there wasn’t any imaginary wine. Jimi was struggling to breathe and fluid built up around his heart and went into his chest. This is what happens to people with congestive heart failure.
There was never any fake wine or any bogus or procedures. You were arguing before 8 years ago there was no vomit in Jimi’s lungs and only clear wine. So, it’s you that loses cuz you made up fake bogus stories for your hoax.
Jason or Ivana you may want to comment on this YT thread of murder claims, one poster claims to have known Tappy and others
Dr Teare never said the fluid was wine. There was never mention of wine in his statement. You would think Dr. Teare would be able to identify any substance being the experienced pathologist that he was. He clearly identified the barbiturates and not the wine as the cause of Jimi’s death.
Teare did not have to say the fluid was wine…If Jimi’s lungs were flooded with wine then any residual fluid that remained in the lungs would have to be wine…It makes sense that 400ml remained in the partly-collapsed left lung because that damaged lung would not drain as easily…Being undamaged, the right lung drained completely and when it did Bannister and Seifert commenced resuscitation…
But you completely avoided my point Ivana…The reason Teare only found vomit in the small bronchi and nowhere else in the lung is because the lung was flooded with wine…The vomit in that wine-bearing portion of the lung got mixed in and diluted with the wine and Bannister suctioned it out…The reason there was still vomit in the small bronchi is because the suction device could not suction that vomit out and it remained trapped in the small bronchi…Since this is exactly what you would see if the lung was filled with wine I’m afraid this is proof that Bannister and Seifert discovered and removed a large amount of wine from Jimi’s lungs…
This has to be the case because for Jason’s scenario to be true there would still have to be vomit in the untreated lung that pushed the other vomit in to the small bronchi…Jason is saying there was no wine and no treatment…For that to be the case then there would still be vomit in the main lung that pushed the other vomit in to the small bronchi…The fact Teare discovered no vomit in the main lung and vomit only in the small bronchi is forensic proof that the vomit in the main lung was mixed in with a large amount of wine and was suctioned out with that wine…
You are not seeing the forensic result you would see with all vomit and no wine in the lung autopsy…You are seeing what would result from wine flooding the lung…
Buster, are you serious? Dr Teare identified the wine in Jimi’s urine and blood he would not have missed any wine in Jimi’s lungs residual or otherwise. Dr. Teare was trying to establish cause of death after all; he certainly would not have missed any contributing factors in the death of Jimi Hendrix. The vomit in Jimi’s system was what he was unable to clear flowing back causing asphyxiation. This was caused by the excessive amount of barbiturates and not the wine. The barbiturates caused Jimi’s death and not the wine.
BUSTER says: Teare did not have to say the fluid was wine.
JASON says: LMAO. Of course Teare does have to say the “fluid is wine” to make your hoax legitimate. Making up fake stories claiming wine like you do is not legitimate.
Teare said nothing about wine. Once again, this debunks your hoax. The fact the fluid contained no imaginary wine proves Jimi had no wine in his lungs like you are trying to claim. If Jimi was “drowned in wine” as you claim, there wouldn’t be any vomit.
A “wine drowning” is a completely different death than the drug overdose Jimi died from.
Teare didn’t miss the wine in Jimi’s lung…As I already explained, and you uncredibly ignored and failed to answer, the fact Teare distinguishes “oedematous fluid” in Jimi’s small bronchi shows that the “free fluid” was something other than oedematous fluid because Teare identified it separately…Since we know Jimi’s lungs were filled with red wine the only thing that 400ml of free fluid could be was residual wine…The reason there was still 400ml remaining in the left lung is because it was partly collapsed and therefore did not drain completely like the right lung…Just like the emergency room doctors described the wine as “vomit” Teare described it as “free fluid” and did not give it proper description…
You then double down on your stupidity by saying vomit that was unable to clear flowed back in to Jimi’s lungs causing asphyxiation…But you stupidly fail to realize you are only proving my point that if that were true then the vomit would still be in there in solid form with no wine…But that is not what we see in the autopsy…What we see is 400ml of residual wine that Teare calls “free fluid” and no such vomit in the main lung…
You’re not answering the point Ivana…If your scenario were true then there would be no wine in the lung and only vomit…For there to be vomit in the small bronchi means other vomit would have forced it there…And if there was no wine then that vomit would still be in the lung and Teare (whom you claim would have identified everything that was there) would have identified it…But he didn’t…What he identified was no vomit in the main lung and 400ml of “free fluid” that had to be residual wine…
You can’t idiotically keep repeating that the barbiturates caused Jimi to asphyxiate on vomit when I already proved that wasn’t possible because Jimi did not have enough Vesparax or time for that to happen…9 Vesparax does not cause the extreme vomiting seen at the death scene in a person with a known tolerance in only 1 or 2 hours…As a matter of fact it doesn’t cause that type of vomiting even in confirmed cases of overdose…This is a valid forensic argument and you can’t just ignore it and still be credible…What it proves is the wine caused the vomiting and low and behold that is a symptom of forced drowning death…
You would have been removed from a seriously moderated debate long ago for ignoring evidence, failing to answer sound arguments, and just repeating your moronic level material…
BUSTER says: Teare did not have to say the fluid was wine.
JASON says: Dr. Teare never documented anything about “wine” in Jimi’s lungs or stomach. The fluid did not contain any wine cuz Teare analyzed the fluid and everything inside Jimi’s body. No wine was ever detected. This is why your hoax is a joke and will always be defeated.
BUSTER says: Teare didn’t miss the wine in Jimi’s lung…As I already explained, and you uncredibly ignored and failed to answer, the fact Teare distinguishes “oedematous fluid” in Jimi’s small bronchi shows that the “free fluid” was something other than oedematous fluid because Teare identified it separately…Since we know Jimi’s lungs were filled with red wine the only thing that 400ml of free fluid could be was residual wine…The reason there was still 400ml remaining in the left lung is because it was partly collapsed and therefore did not drain completely like the right lung…Just like the emergency room doctors described the wine as “vomit” Teare described it as “free fluid” and did not give it proper description…
JASON says: Dr. Teare never documented any alcohol in Jimi’s lungs or documented any wine in the fluid. Where are you getting your information from?
The “emergency room doctors” did not describe “wine as vomit”. Only Fraud Bannister claimed Jimi had wine coming out of his mouth and nose. Dr. Siefert and Dr. Brown never stated anything about wine. Dr. Bob Brown confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose.
BUSTER says: You then double down on your stupidity by saying vomit that was unable to clear flowed back in to Jimi’s lungs causing asphyxiation…But you stupidly fail to realize you are only proving my point that if that were true then the vomit would still be in there in solid form with no wine…But that is not what we see in the autopsy…What we see is 400ml of residual wine that Teare calls “free fluid” and no such vomit in the main lung…
JASON says: If Jimi was unconscious from barbiturates as you claim, and then was “forced drowned in wine”, there wouldn’t be any vomit. The wine would have killed Jimi.
BUSTER says: You’re not answering the point Ivana…If your scenario were true then there would be no wine in the lung and only vomit…For there to be vomit in the small bronchi means other vomit would have forced it there…And if there was no wine then that vomit would still be in the lung and Teare (whom you claim would have identified everything that was there) would have identified it…But he didn’t…What he identified was no vomit in the main lung and 400ml of “free fluid” that had to be residual wine…
JASON says: Show us where wine or alcohol was documented in Jimi’s lungs on any hospital or autopsy report.
BUSTER says: You can’t idiotically keep repeating that the barbiturates caused Jimi to asphyxiate on vomit when I already proved that wasn’t possible because Jimi did not have enough Vesparax or time for that to happen…9 Vesparax does not cause the extreme vomiting seen at the death scene in a person with a known tolerance in only 1 or 2 hours…As a matter of fact it doesn’t cause that type of vomiting even in confirmed cases of overdose…This is a valid forensic argument and you can’t just ignore it and still be credible…What it proves is the wine caused the vomiting and low and behold that is a symptom of forced drowning death…
JASON says: Dr. Teare and Dr. Thurston were the two most renowned doctors in the UK confirming Jimi Hendrix died from asphyxiation of vomit due to a barbiturate overdose. Taking 18 times the normal dosage of medication will cause extreme vomiting cuz it’s poisoning the system. Are you this freaking clueless?
You are claiming Jimi was forced drowned to death by wine. There would be no vomit when consecutive bottles of wine are being forced down his throat like you claim he was unconscious when it happened. You can’t vomit when you are claiming
Jimi was “drowned to death by liquid”. A fake wine drowning is a completely different death than Jimi’s drug overdose death. Teare did not find Jimi’s lungs were “drowned” cuz it would have been detected in the autopsy. Once again you make up bogus claims and medical science refutes you.
You have no real evidence and only fake stories you make up for your dead hoax.
Jason is lying above…Teare never analyzed that “free fluid” in Jimi’s lung nor can Jason show where Teare did that…When Jason is caught lying and forced to answer the real evidence he pulls lies like this out of his ass because he’s a demented troll who isn’t here for sane or honest purposes…All that is happening here is Jason’s typical lies have publicly failed to answer what the fluid was?…Teare mentioned oedematous fluid in the small bronchi…That means the free fluid was something other than oedematous fluid because if it was oedematous fluid Teare would have said it was found in the larger lung too…The 400ml of free fluid was residual wine because we know the lungs were filled with wine as Bannister witnessed…Jason is lying and trying to get around it…
My information comes from the direct text of Jimi’s autopsy data sheets…Jason has badly failed to answer the clear and obvious pathology of the damaged lung not draining fully because of its partly collapsed state…The right lung was undamaged so it drained completely…What there being 400ml of wine in the left lung and little wine in the right lung tells you is as soon as Bannister and Seifert cleared the right lung they went right to resuscitation in order to get oxygen to the victim…What you are seeing in Jimi’s lung autopsy is exactly what you would see if Bannister’s version were correct…
Jason has already been informed repeatedly that documentarian David Kramer has Seifert on video from a 1990’s interview saying “Jimi was covered in wine”…Jason ignores this because he is not seeking the truth – Jason is seeking the deception and is publicly avoiding the facts…There is no jury in the world that would not side with me once shown Seifert’s admission along side his denial…That same jury would finally put an end to this trolling denier Jason and his lies…We have Dr Bannister’s story never changing one iota in all the decades he’s been telling it…And we also have Seifert telling two diametrically opposite stories…It is obvious that Seifert panicked and got sloppy one he realized how dangerous his witnessing was…Jason is lying when he says Seifert never mentioned any wine…
It is stupid for Jason to say if Jimi was force-drowned there wouldn’t have been any vomit…Jason is a sick motherfucker who dementedly ignores that Jimi was witnessed covered in a grotesque amount of vomit at the death scene…It is well-known in medicine that vomiting is common when drowning…A doctor would laugh in Jason’s face if he said force-drowning produces no vomiting…It would be correct to say, however, that a person with a well-known tolerance cannot vomit that profusely from 9 Vesparax in only 1 or 2 hours…Jason is hiding the fact he can’t produce another case where any person taking 9 Vesparax vomited that way…These people are claiming the barbiturate inhibited Jimi’s gag reflex causing him to choke on his own vomit…However they don’t account for that claim in regard to the extreme vomiting seen at the death scene – which shows Jimi died well before any inhibition of his gag reflex…
Jason dishonestly ignores that the Hospital Report recorded the half hour Bannister and Seifert took to attempt resuscitation…20 minutes of that was removing the wine…Jason also ignores that I proved the wine in the lung autopsy…Jason wasn’t able to answer the fact Teare only found vomit in the small bronchi – which proves the rest of the vomit was suspended in the wine Bannister suctioned from the rest of the lung…Jason is just here for idiotic trolling so he conspicuously has trouble with the higher forensics he stupidly can’t answer…Jason also trollishly ignores the reference Flyswatter provided of “Resuscitation Attempt Failed” written in the autopsy…It is right there in plain writing in the autopsy that they did a resuscitation attempt…Jason is just in sick contempt of the evidence…
You’re lying Jason and you won’t be able to show any other person who vomited that way from 9 Vesparax…You’re trolling and just pulling that out of your ass…Meanwhile you ignore that the Vesparax overdose case histories Glebbeek posted in his ‘Until We Meet Again’ publication proved that persons who took 1 to 6 more Vesparax than Jimi never vomited that way…The most they had was a strange red foam in the mouth but no extreme vomiting…That vomiting was obviously caused by the forced drowning that left 400ml of wine in the left lung…
You’re an idiot Jason and wine that was removed 3 days earlier at St Mary’s could not be detected by Teare…We do have proof, however, that Teare told Thurston of a large amount of red wine in Jimi’s stomach…This is proof of malfeasance and corruption of the autopsy and Inquest…
You should quit this Jason…You lost this a long time ago…
BUSTER says: Jason is lying above…Teare never analyzed that “free fluid” in Jimi’s lung nor can Jason show where Teare did that…When Jason is caught lying and forced to answer the real evidence he pulls lies like this out of his ass because he’s a demented troll who isn’t here for sane or honest purposes…All that is happening here is Jason’s typical lies have publicly failed to answer what the fluid was?…Teare mentioned oedematous fluid in the small bronchi…That means the free fluid was something other than oedematous fluid because if it was oedematous fluid Teare would have said it was found in the larger lung too…The 400ml of free fluid was residual wine because we know the lungs were filled with wine as Bannister witnessed…Jason is lying and trying to get around it…
JASON says: This is exactly why Buster is a serial troll and is banned everywhere. He discredits documented evidence for his fake bogus alternate stories that never happened.
During an autopsy, EVERYTHING inside a body is analyzed. An autopsy details everything in a body to determine the cause of death. If a pathologist didn’t analyze fluids, contents, and organs they would never know the cause of death. Are you that stupid?
This isn’t like your fake Fraud Bannister stories where he claimed to suction out bottles of wine and “dump it down the drain”. This is real life medical science where doctors detail and analyze everything. Pathetic how Buster is trying to claim Teare didn’t analyze bodily fluids when that’s the whole purpose of his job. You are a really weak troll and are a lousy one at that. Trying to claim a world renowned pathologist isn’t going to analyze bodily fluids to determine the cause of death. You are pathetic.
Go ask a pathologist if they don’t analyze fluid or contents inside the body. They will laugh in your face.
Could you imagine in Buster’s world where pathologists don’t do anything except stare at the cadaver and bodily fluids just guessing what happened to the person without doing any work? This is the bullshit Buster wants you to believe and why his hoax is a scam. Buster knows damn well the fluid contained no wine that’s why he is trying so hard to discredit Teare and ruin his reputation as a renowned doctor to push his bogus hoax.
Buster can only claim Teare didn’t analyze the fluid cuz he knows there was no wine. We’ve already gone over this last year and Buster was easily defeated. The fluid built up around Jimi’s heart and went into his lungs from the restricted breathing from the drug overdose. This same thing that happens to people with bad hearts who suffer from congestive heart failure. Teare detected that around Jimi’s heart which was working too hard and it went into his lungs. The reason they were both congested. If Jimi’s lungs were “drowned” all that evidence would be obvious. They would have been expanded like a balloon. Nothing like that was ever found from a fake “wine drowning”. All the evidence left behind inside Jimi’s body was from a drug overdose especially with the toxic liver levels. That again proves no phony “wine drowning” happened. I’ve been asking Buster for a year to show documented proof of wine and he provides nothing cuz fake wine never existed. There was no abnormal detection of alcohol in Jimi’s liver. But there was a toxic level of barbiturates. That kills Buster’s hoax again.
BUSTER says: My information comes from the direct text of Jimi’s autopsy data sheets…Jason has badly failed to answer the clear and obvious pathology of the damaged lung not draining fully because of its partly collapsed state…The right lung was undamaged so it drained completely…What there being 400ml of wine in the left lung and little wine in the right lung tells you is as soon as Bannister and Seifert cleared the right lung they went right to resuscitation in order to get oxygen to the victim…What you are seeing in Jimi’s lung autopsy is exactly what you would see if Bannister’s version were correct…
JASON says: What an absolute farce.
There is nothing listed with imaginary “wine” or fake “procedures” on any “autopsy sheet”. Dr. Bob Brown said “nothing was done for Jimi Hendrix” and Kathy Etchingham saw every medical document during her investigation. She said nothing like this ever happened. Buster is making this stuff all up for his bogus hoax.
In Buster’s bizarre Hendrix hoax he has two emergency room doctors like in a science fiction movie doing weird medical Frankenstein procedures on a several hour dead decomposing corpse. They drain only one lung and leave the other one full of fluid. They leave the stomach full of wine and only add one lung full of oxygen. Who in their right mind would believe this crap?
It’s obvious what serial troll Buster is doing. He trying to tailor his fake story to coincide with Teare’s findings except he’s using his wine scam instead of Jimi’s actual overdose.
Ask Buster to produce written hospital records for oxygen, lung draining, and extensive resuscitation. You get crickets cuz none of this crap ever happened. It all would have been documented in Jimi’s medical report and would have been published. Kathy Etchingham confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose and had no phony procedures.
BUSTER says: Jason has already been informed repeatedly that documentarian David Kramer has Seifert on video from a 1990’s interview saying “Jimi was covered in wine”…Jason ignores this because he is not seeking the truth – Jason is seeking the deception and is publicly avoiding the facts…There is no jury in the world that would not side with me once shown Seifert’s admission along side his denial…That same jury would finally put an end to this trolling denier Jason and his lies…We have Dr Bannister’s story never changing one iota in all the decades he’s been telling it…And we also have Seifert telling two diametrically opposite stories…It is obvious that Seifert panicked and got sloppy one he realized how dangerous his witnessing was…Jason is lying when he says Seifert never mentioned any wine…
JASON says: St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose and never said anything about Jimi being covered in wine. Ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones saw Jimi dead first and witnessed no wine on him. Only dry vomit. Both of them said Jimi died from a drug overdose. Officer Ian Smith saw no wine on Jimi Hendrix. He said he died from a routine overdose. So, who besides you can confirm Jimi was “drowned in wine”? The answer is nobody cuz it never happened.
Dr. Bob Brown never saw wine on Jimi Hendrix and he confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose.
Dr. Siefert also said he detected no alcohol on Jimi, so Buster is using a contradicting claim.
Dr. Teare found no wine in his autopsy findings. Buster is a pathological liar. I’ve shown in my Bannister series where Fraud Bannister has changed his phony stories over the years. In fact, just the other day I’ve shown how he changed his fake stories.
He said Jimi was dead for several hours but then he claims he was working on him.
Here is fraud Bannister admitting nothing was done for Jimi Hendrix.
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality” – Fraud Bannister
This is documented evidence. Fraud Bannister said above Jimi was dead on arrival but later was ridiculously claiming he performed “procedures” on Jimi. He changed his stories. Bannister said “resuscitation was a formality” meaning nothing happened. That backs up both Siefert and Brown.
Buster is a total moron claiming dead people like Jimi Hendrix have “extensive procedures” when they are decomposing. Nobody believes the crap you peddle.
Where is your documented evidence of wine besides your phony story telling?
Was Jimi alive or dead when you claim these “extensive procedures” took place?
Are you seriously going to claim doctors were frantically working hard on a long dead several hour decomposing corpse? The readers are laughing hard at you. Make your hoax a little more realistic.
The way you can tell Jason has been caught is how he responds with a large bullshit to substance ratio to evidence he can’t answer…Jason is lying and Teare did not analyze the 400ml of free fluid he found in Jimi’s left lung…Jason fails to answer the simple fact that any heart failure fluid would be oedematous fluid…Since Teare already identified oedematous fluid in the small bronchi that means the “free fluid” was something else…If the free fluid was oedematous fluid from the heart Teare would have written “There was oedematous fluid in the small bronchi and larger lung”…Teare never analyzed the free fluid because I have Jimi’s complete autopsy data sheets and no such analysis is in it…Jason is lying and Teare’s failure to analyze the free fluid is evidence of the cover-up…The way Jason works is you accuse him of referring to a non-existent examination of the free fluid and he answers by re-entering another long trolling lecture on an examination that he can’t produce any proof for…The 400ml of free fluid was obviously residual wine…Jason hangs himself by his own petard by stupidly not realizing that indeed Teare was a professional and would have entered written examinations of everything – the lack of any documentation proving he did no examination of the free fluid…
Jason trollishly hopes the readers will forget that Dr Thurston spoke of Jimi’s stomach being full of red wine…The only way Thurston could know of that red wine bloating the stomach would be either from the emergency room doctor (Seifert) or Teare…The most likely choice would be Teare since he examined the stomach at autopsy…Again – evidence of the cover-up…
Jason deals with his inability to explain the residual wine “free fluid” by entering a pseudo-analysis on heart congestion fluid entering the lungs…But remember Jason has still not been able to give any answer to why there was vomit in the small bronchi and none in the larger lung?…Jason avoids answering evidence that defeats him and tries to switch the subject in to diversion based on lengthy bullshit…But he hasn’t been able to answer, if his claim of no wine and no procedure is true, why there was no vomit in the larger lung if there was vomit in the small bronchi?…Jason can’t back up his claim at a technical level and if his claim of no wine were true then there would be vomit all through the lung in order for it to have been pushed to the small bronchi…But we don’t see that in Teare’s autopsy…What we see is vomit only in the small bronchi and not in the larger lung…The reason for that is the wine that flooded the rest of the lung suspended the vomit within it and when Bannister suctioned the lungs out the vomit went with it…Jason can’t respond to this because it is proof of the wine…
Jason ignores the better argument and just trollishly repeats his idiotic claims over and over…He has been repeatedly told 9 Vesparax can’t produce fatal levels in a person with a known tolerance…When Jason gets defeated by science he resorts to trolling semantics…In this case he emphasizes “toxic” in a non-scientific way hoping people will think Jimi had fatal levels of barbiturate in him…But that is simply a lie on Jason’s behalf…The bottom line Jason is contemptuously ignoring is 9 Vesparax could not be “toxic” in the way Jason deliberately misrepresents in his trolling…A person with Jimi’s tolerance could not overdose on 9 Vesparax tablets…Especially in only 1 or 2 hours…Jason knows this is true because, if you look at his replies, he ignores it each and every time in order to return to semantics trolling…Jason also contemptuously ignores that alcohol would not be present in the liver because Jimi “died” shortly after being drowned by the wine…Again – in any credibly-moderated debate Jason would have been ejected for ignoring evidence and trolling in response…He’s just an internet asshole who is here to deny anything that comes up on his screen…
Jason is once again lying when he claims nothing indicated any wine removal on the autopsy sheet…Written in plain writing on the data sheet is “Resuscitation Attempt Failed”…That was a registration of the wine removal Bannister claimed…It was further corroborated by the half hour treatment period listed on the Hospital Report…Jason is in open trolling denial of this…We know this is true because Scotland Yard acted guilty by failing to locate and interview the nurses who would have witnessed this because they knew what those nurses would say…Just to show Jason’s sick nature, he has the balls to reference Kathy Etchingham – the person who obtained the Hospital Report which showed that 1/2 hour treatment time…Mitch’s writer Platt also obtained and referenced it in his book…
Again – it is FACT that David Kramer has Seifert on video saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…Look how this demented trolling asshole Jason deals with this in his response…Because of Jason’s dedication to Satanic evil he cannot get himself to look at the light…He refuses to acknowledge that Seifert lied when he said that he detected no alcohol on Jimi…Even better it is possible Seifert never said that and Glebbeek simply made it up…Glebbeek is also an unwell person who has contempt for the community and his readers and isn’t afraid to outright lie…Jason is lying and ignoring Kramer’s video because he knows it disproves everything he’s claimed here…Because once Seifert admits to the wine then everybody in the chain of witnessing before him had to necessarily witness that same wine…Bob Brown, the ambulance men, and even Monika who showed severe guilt when forced to answer for it…
Jason is a sick liar because Dr Thurston evidenced the wine to Jack Meehan…And once he did he was responsible, by that same medical code Jason keeps referencing, to input it in to the autopsy that showed only a trace of blood alcohol in Jimi…Thurston, being the chief coroner of the London Coroner’s Office was responsible to process and determine that forensic conflict…Jason is sick scum because he’s in open lying denial that we have a full evidence chain of Bannister’s wine suctioning…Once Seifert connects the witnessing by claiming the wine, and Thurston re-confirms it by citing a belly-full of wine, then we have all the evidence we need for Jimi being drowned in wine and the British authorities criminally covering it up…Jason is trollishly ignoring the confirming evidence we have and trying to deny it by citing false context…Reality and evidence discussion doesn’t work that way…He’s just an unpunished troll…
When all else fails, go back to the debunked phony Thurston claim made up by fraudster Sharon Lawrence and embellished by hoaxing troll Buster for his scam. Thurston never said anything about wine in 1970 and there is no documented evidence of him talking about it. All we get is a 31 year later after the fact claim when Thurston was long dead from serial liar Sharon Lawrence who printed terrible lies in her Jimi Hendrix fiction book. Of course Buster uses her lies, cuz it fits right with his phony narrative. Their lies are all easily debunked just like all the others.
BUSTER says: Jason trollishly hopes the readers will forget that Dr Thurston spoke of Jimi’s stomach being full of red wine…The only way Thurston could know of that red wine bloating the stomach would be either from the emergency room doctor (Seifert) or Teare…The most likely choice would be Teare since he examined the stomach at autopsy…Again – evidence of the cover-up…
Jason is a sick liar because Dr Thurston evidenced the wine to Jack Meehan…And once he did he was responsible, by that same medical code Jason keeps referencing, to input it in to the autopsy that showed only a trace of blood alcohol in Jimi…Thurston, being the chief coroner of the London Coroner’s Office was responsible to process and determine that forensic conflict…Jason is sick scum because he’s in open lying denial that we have a full evidence chain of Bannister’s wine suctioning…Once Seifert connects the witnessing by claiming the wine, and Thurston re-confirms it by citing a belly-full of wine, then we have all the evidence we need for Jimi being drowned in wine and the British authorities criminally covering it up…Jason is trollishly ignoring the confirming evidence we have and trying to deny it by citing false context…Reality and evidence discussion doesn’t work that way…He’s just an unpunished troll…
JASON says: This is nothing but disinformation and fiction. Dr. Thurston is not on the official record making a statement about wine. Buster is embellishing a fake made up second hand quote from fraudster Sharon Lawrence. From there, he invents this fictional tale from his deranged mind that never happened. Buster cannot produce one source where this has been documented cuz he is making it all up in his crazy ass head.
Dr. Thurston said barbiturates was the cause of Jimi Hendrix’s death. He never said one word about fake imaginary wine. Red wine was never “bloating” Jimi’s stomach cuz Dr. Teare only found undigested rice in Jimi’s stomach which is documented on the autopsy report.
Buster invents a fake “cover up” smearing the reputations of famous renowned doctors cuz he has no evidence of wine and needs to keep his scam going. Buster the hoaxer is the only person to make this bogus charge of a “cover up”. That’s why this is all bullshit.
Dr. Thurston did not “evidence the wine to Jack Meehan” and there was no “belly full of wine”. Fraudster Sharon Lawrence made up this fake quote in her Jimi Hendrix fiction book. Buster uses this fake quote cuz it fits his phony narrative.
Dr. Thurston emphatically concluded in 1970 that Jimi Hendrix did not commit suicide in his final report after the inquest. 31 years later, scam artist Sharon Lawrence said Jimi committed suicide attempting to discredit Dr. Thurston. Sharon made up this fraudulent bizarre story of Jimi being a devil worshipping occultist being obsessed with the number 9 killing himself in a suicide pact. She also lied in her book where Jimi was born and made up fake quotes about Jimi’s deceased mother. Then to top it all off, she made up another fake quote about Dr. Thurston claiming he told her colleague, an obscure reporter named Jack Meehan about Jimi being ‘imbibed with wine’. Meehan died in 1973 and Thurston in 1980 so obviously they can’t call Sharon out on her lies. Thurston is on not on any official record making this statement. This is only coming from serial liar Sharon Lawrence who claimed this just “popped into her head” as she was writing her book. Of course it did, cuz she made the whole thing up in 2001 as she was writing it. Sharon Lawrence lied about Jimi committing suicide, she lied about where Jimi was born, she made up fake quotes about Jimi’s deceased mother, and she made up the fake Thurston and Meehan story too. Hell, this woman even auctioned off empty cigarette packs claiming they belonged to Jimi Hendrix before he died. So, we can see she is a scam artist looking to make quick buck anyway she can at the expense of Jimi Hendrix. Anyone who claims to be a “close friend” of Jimi Hendrix and then degrades him in a conspiracy book saying he killed himself with disparaging remarks is an awful person and cannot be trusted as a real source. Jimi Hendrix did not kill himself and this woman wrote this lie in her book to make money cuz she knew a “suicide claim” would sell just like Tappy “the fraud” Wright knew a bogus claim about Jimi being “murdered” by his manger would sell. These people are all liars, scam artists, and fraudsters who only tell a phony tale and have no evidence to back up what they claim.
Buster has no evidence of this fake wine suctioning at the hospital. St. Mary Abbotts Hospital was required by law to document any “procedures” performed on a patient. There is no hospital medical record confirming Jimi Hendrix had his stomach and lungs suctioned out. This event never happened which is why nothing exists. The fake suctioning claim didn’t start until 1992.
Buster has admitted Jimi Hendrix died at 5:30am. Jimi arrived dead at the hospital 6 hours later where he was pronounced dead on arrival. Hospitals are not going to do “procedures” on a 6 hour long dead decomposing corpse. Ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones saw no wine at the flat or on Jimi Hendrix. Officer Ian Smith saw no wine either and in the early 90’s confirmed Jimi died from a routine drug overdose. Dr. Bob Brown was the first doctor to see a dead decomposing Hendrix. Brown never saw wine and also confirmed in several interviews over the years Jimi died from a drug overdose. Not a lick of documented evidence of wine and all we get are fake wine claims from these hoaxers.
Jimi did not have a “trace” of alcohol. Jimi was over the legal limit enough to fail a breathalyzer test. This is confirmed by both Dr. Teare in his findings in Jimi’s blood and Kathy Etchingham who read Jimi’s autopsy report.
Thurston is on the official record declaring barbiturates caused Jimi’s death. Not a single word about fake wine. In 1970 wine was never an issue cuz it didn’t exist. Not until 1992 did Fraud Bannister make his fake wine claim and then all these bogus tales started. If there was all this fake wine in 1970, St. Mary Abbotts Hospital would have confirmed it in their official statement to the press. They confirmed it was a drug overdose. People would have talked about “wine” in 1970. When these fraudsters have no evidence or documents of “wine” you know they are pulling a hoax. If there was actually wine, we would have documented medical documents of it. Wine does not exist.
Buster knows he can’t produce any documents of wine. Not one ever exists cuz there is none. So, he makes up outlandish stories and trashes the reputations of deceased famous renowned doctors accusing them of committing a crime and concealing evidence. Buster is just a scumbag troll who is looking for relevance on the internet but is known all over as a hoaxing clown. Buster is banned from every website on the internet for this reason.
Funny how Dr. Teare could easily pinpoint the wine level in Jimi’s blood and urine but seemed unable to put a name to the liquid in Jimi’s lungs. Any great quantity of wine was also missing from the autopsy report also there was no mention of wine as being in the vomited material. Jimi would have reeked of wine if he had been murdered with it. To be blindly reporting what was contained in a debunked book about Jimi being murdered with wine leads me to believe that some of us have trouble differentiating truth from fiction.
Pulmonary edema or fluid in the lungs is a sign of approaching death breathing is laboured and noisy. Monika maintained that Jimi was breathing normally while she was checking his pulse but this can’t be true since Jimi was dying from taking her medication. On top of that heavy breathing Jimi vomited causing him to choke because he was clearly unconscious and dying from the massive overdose unable to clear his throat.
Hi Ivana,
It’s hilarious to read Buster’s elaborate phony claims for “wine and vomit” narrating his fake story of “knowing what he claims Teare did” when none of the crap he’s posting was ever documented as facts. This is all made up lies by our serial troll Buster.
What Buster fails to realize is there wouldn’t be any vomit in a “waterboarding murder”. The liquid wine would have killed Jimi. Also, it would have been documented as a “drowning”. The official cause of death was asphyxiation cuz the vomit from the barbiturate overdose suffocated Jimi to death. Dr. Rufus Crompton read Jimi’s autopsy report and stated to Kathy Etchingham that the reading of Jimi’s liver was so high he would have died from the Vesparax anyway. The 9 pills Jimi took poisoned his liver and that high reading was documeted in Jimi’s autopsy. Teare analyzed everything inside Jimi’s body. If all that imaginary “wine” was flooding the inside of Jimi’s body, Teare would have detected it during his forensic analysis. He would have detected abnormal amounts of wine though Jimi’s mouth, throat, esophagus, lungs, and stomach. No wine was ever found. And everything that Teare discovered was from a drug overdose. Buster makes up new wild claims but has no documented evidence to ever produce. It’s only “his version” of fake events that never happened. He runs away when you force him to answer questions cuz he has no real answers for his fake stories.
Buster isn’t interested about the truth or facts. All he cares about is to claim “Jimi was murdered” and wants to “debate”. He lies, changes fake stories, makes up new fake stories in order to win a “debate”. He uses Jimi Hendrix for his own trolling game and I think that’s a disgrace.
Hi Jason, I’ve just been reading about the collapsed lung that Jimi had this is caused by a blocked airway; this fits in perfectly with what the ambulance attendants said about there being dry vomit all the way down and with Jimi being dead for several hours. Also the fluid in the lungs is a sign of approaching death, and not what Buster wants us to believe that it’s evidence of waterboarding with wine. This guy is a kook.
Hi Ivana,
Excellent job. I was going to nail Buster the hoaxer with that but glad you posted it. Jimi’s lung was “partially collapsed” and it wasn’t from a phony “wine drowning or hospital procedures”.
John Saua and Reginal Jones both confirmed dry vomit all the way down. Buster and Fraud Bannister are claiming wine was flooding Jimi’s lungs up to his throat. If that was the case, both Saua and Jones would have detected wine and would have been sucking wet liquid wine. Jimi’s throat was dry with vomit. It is impossible to be flooded with “wine” when the throat is dry with dry vomit.
Yes, Buster is a kook giving us his own bogus account. Nothing he says was ever documented by a legitimate source. It’s coming from him where he claims “he knows what happened”. No wine or phony procedures but he wants us to believe it happened. How can a “procedure” help a dead several hour corpse? How can you have a flooding throat full of wine when both ambulance men were sucking out dry vomit? How can Buster claim Jimi was murdered by a phony “wine drowning” and then be alive hours later to have “life saving procedures” at the hospital?
In Buster’s world of make believe, he turns Jimi into a magical man who can withstand any amount of drugs and can appear both dead and alive when he wants him to with imaginary wine springing up from out of nowhere. That’s what a hoaxer does folks, they invent ridiculous nonsense hoping others will believe it. Buster’s stories are so stupid, even he doesn’t believe the crap he’s pushing, that’s why he’s constantly changing them all the time. Remember, a real life actual event never ever changes. Buster changes his fake claims all the time when it suits him. That’s how you know everything he says is fake.
Buster, I suggest you crawl back into your conspiracy theorist hole and stay there until you have something true and valid to say. I’m sick and tired of reading your lies. 🤥
Buster latched on to Tappy “The Fraud” Wright’s fake murder by wine claim and invented his own fake version to peddle. Not one thing Buster says is valid nor does he have any real documented evidence to produce to ever back up his fiction.
Both ambulance men John Suaua and Reginal Jones confirmed they only witnessed dry vomit on the body of Jimi Hendrix and inside his throat when they used an aspirator to suck it out. Neither man mentioned wine at all. Both confirmed Jimi was long dead when they arrived at the flat.
Dr. Bob Brown was the first doctor at the hospital to see Jimi arrive dead. He never witnessed any wine either. Brown said he “couldn’t do anything for Jimi cuz he was already dead” for a long period of time. Brown confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose and was present during the official hospital statement to the media. If there was all this massive wine and phony procedures, then the hospital would have stated: “We attempted to save Jimi’s life but unfortunately he didn’t make it” and would have said alcohol was the cause of death. The hospital clearly stated it was a drug overdose and said nothing about wine. The hospital also confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival since he was already dead for several hours. But then Buster, makes up fake stories of imaginary wine and phony procedures trying to discredit St. Mary Abbotts Hospital. When you ask Buster to explain why a dead corpse would need to have “procedures”, he says, “I’m switching the subject and trolling”. No, he is the one making the fake claims and refusing to answer them when he’s questioned. Buster is banned serial troll.
Dr. Teare, the top pathologist in the UK, discovered no abnormal wine inside the body during Jimi’s autopsy. He confirmed a lethal drug overdose of Vesparax with the toxic readings he found in Jimi’s liver. If any abnormal detection of alcohol was found, Teare would have documented it like he did everything else. Also, a “wine drowning” would show signs of a murder and the lungs would show signs of a drowning. Nothing like that was ever found or documented. Teare was a famous pathologist who worked on famous murder cases. So, he would know what a murder would look like.
So, no wine is ever documented anywhere, not at the flat, hospital, or in the autopsy. But Buster makes up these fake stories of wine telling us “this is how it is” when he was never there to know and has no documented evidence to show us anything he claims is legitimate. This is why Buster is a serial troll hoaxer, he attempts to discredit real documented evidence and instead pushes his own bogus claims with how he wants people to believe it happened. No fake wine anywhere and he uses Tappy “the fraud” Wright’s fake wine claim to push his own fake stories. Really pathetic.
If it’s not documented it never happened.
Hi Jason, Good job with your posting today. Too many people have been accused of a coverup and made to look like they’re corrupt and incompetent in some way. If Jimi had been drowned with all that wine, five bottles in total, surely his body would have been bloated in some way in particular his stomach, bladder and throat, and his urine output would have been massive not as little as Dr. Teare found during the autopsy.
Thanks Ivana,
You were spot on with your comments refuting Buster’s hoaxing lies.
Glad you mentioned the bloating. I’ve said this many months ago too that Jimi would have been severely bloated from all the fake wine Buster is promoting.
If 5 bottles of wine were poured into Jimi while he was unconscious, as Buster claims, then the drowning of the wine would have killed Jimi. Jimi wouldn’t have been able to vomit cuz he would be dead. The vomiting occurred cuz Jimi was having a reaction to the overdose of medication that was poisioning his system. Also, if all that wine was poured into Jimi, his body would have been bloated and his kidneys and liver would have been abnormal with all the alcohol being poured in him. And the bottles of alcohol would have been detected in the tissues and liver by Teare during forensic analysis. No alcohol like that was ever found. Only toxic levels of barbiturates were found. That’s why real medical science and analysis will always defeat fake wine claims.
Both ambulance men were the first men to see Jimi Hendrix dead. When they moved him off the bed on to the special chair to get him up the stairs, wine would have been pouring out of Jimi. He would have been bloated and his stomach would have been like a water balloon cuz all the bottles of wine would have been trapped inside his body with nowhere to go. Neither ambulance man witnessed anything like this. In fact, both men said it was an overdose of drugs from the death scene. The entire room would have smelled from wine. Neither men said anything about wine in their official statements.
Buster uses “wine” as his “murder weapon”, yet not one credible professional who was a witness said anything about “wine”, it was always drugs. And not one hospital medical record exists with “wine” being documented nor does anything mention “wine” on the autopsy report. The only fake wine claims come from 4 discredited frauds: Tappy Wright, Fraud Bannister, Sharon Lawrence, and “Buster” himself. With their phony wine claims, not one of them could ever produce any documented evidence for wine. They were all decades later after the fact bogus claims and they were all proven liars. Sharon Lawrence said Jimi committed suicide by taking 9 pills so even she knew the pills were strong enough to kill Jimi, but she decided to make her stories even worse by claiming phony wine when Jimi was already dead.
Buster has changed his phony stories for his fake “murder” claim many times. He said Jimi was “force fed pills” but then later claimed Jimi voluntarily took them. He said Jimi was “forced drowned in wine” by Jeffery and Monika but later claimed “no one would need to force wine into Jimi”. He even ridiculously claimed “London thugs” passing by and killed Jimi. Buster also has every intelligence agency playing a part in it. Nowhere was this ever documented. It’s only fake stories coming from this hoaxing kook Buster aka Albert Doyle.
5 bottles of wine would have bloated Jimi. The ambulance men and the police would have seen it right away and would have conducted an investigation. The reason they didn’t cuz it was a routine overdose and they had no idea who it was. Dr. Bob Brown would have seen the bloating. He didn’t see it. The hospital clearly would have stated it during the press conference. Dr. Teare would has seen the damage from it during the autopsy. Nothing like that was ever detected. That’s why this is nothing but a hoax. Everything found, witnessed, and documented pertains to a drug overdose.
All you are seeing above is two trolls who are focusing on the word “bloated”…Obviously Jimi would not have been excessively bloated because he had vomited-out so much…Jason and Ivana are too dumb to realize they are only proving my point in reverse because Jimi was extremely bloated after being force-drowned in wine and that is why his body vomited violently…
Jason is stupid because the drowning process and death takes several minutes…It would take several minutes to pour the wine in…Jimi would be vomiting while that was happening, which explains the vomit in the small bronchi…That vomit got pulled-in by the last respirations of Jimi’s lungs…The extreme vomiting was one last involuntary brain stem surge in reaction to the forced-drowning…It is medically stupid to say no vomiting would happen after Jimi was force-drowned because he was dead…It defies easily-understood simple medicine…
Jason offers a retard’s version of forensics that would be laughed-out of any serious venue…He stupidly (trollishly) fails to realize that there would be little to no registration of the wine’s alcohol in the liver or tissues because there wasn’t time for the alcohol to be absorbed…In fact that is part of our forensic case – that there was too much wine with too little blood alcohol for Jimi to have introduced the wine himself…
Jason incompetently ignores that 9 Vesparax cannot cause that kind of vomiting…Especially in a person with a known tolerance…Jason keeps saying the Vesparax caused the vomiting but he won’t be able to produce any other case where the victim took 9 Vesparax and vomited that way…This totally refutes Jason, but he ignores it and re-enters the same claim in the next post…
Jason stupidly ignores that the ambulance men noted unusual gurgling sounds coming from Jimi when they transported him…That was the wine Jimi was bloated with…Jason ignores that the ambulance men said a hard cork of vomit was blocking Jimi’s throat therefore no wine would pour from Jimi…Jason is stupid because if the wine were that accessible the ambulance men would have removed it right there…
Jason lies and says the ambulance men did not note any wine in the vomit…This isn’t true because one of them said there were “great pools of vomit” around Jimi…”Pools” connotes a high liquid content…
Jason is a sick troll and internet scum…The witnesses of the wine he slanders and tries too hard to deny were there at the time and are credible…Jason is just an internet asshole trolling the subject…Sharon got Monika to admit the wine in an incriminating way…The rest falls in to place…
Jason is lying and I never once said Jimi was “force-fed pills”…He was set-up to take them and Monika willingly provided them…
Jason is trolling semantics and intentionally misquoting the context of my words…He knows as well as I that what I was saying was no one would have to restrain Jimi to force the wine in to him because he had a .7mg barbiturate blood level…Jason is dishonestly trying to squeeze dishonest meaning out of semantics and misquotes, which would earn him censure in any credibly moderated forum…
Jason is switching the subject to this “bloating” business because he badly failed to account for his version via the lung autopsy…He was publicly unable to account for why vomit was only found in the small bronchi and not the rest of the lung if there was no wine?…If you can’t answer that you lose…That’s how evidence works…Jason couldn’t answer it…And the rest of his idiotic arguments don’t serve as any substitute…
More the of the same lies and fake stories from this serial troll.
BUSTER says: All you are seeing above is two trolls who are focusing on the word “bloated”…Obviously Jimi would not have been excessively bloated because he had vomited-out so much…Jason and Ivana are too dumb to realize they are only proving my point in reverse because Jimi was extremely bloated after being force-drowned in wine and that is why his body vomited violently…
JASON says: Jimi vomited cuz he died from a lethal drug overdose. You are claiming he was “drowned in wine” from his “stomach to his throat”. Forced drowning would have killed Jimi causing severe bloating and he wouldn’t be vomiting. The massive amount of alcohol would have killed him dumbass. That’s why your hoax is a joke and you’re a banned serial troll.
BUSTER says: Jason is stupid because the drowning process and death takes several minutes…It would take several minutes to pour the wine in…Jimi would be vomiting while that was happening, which explains the vomit in the small bronchi…That vomit got pulled-in by the last respirations of Jimi’s lungs…The extreme vomiting was one last involuntary brain stem surge in reaction to the forced-drowning…It is medically stupid to say no vomiting would happen after Jimi was force-drowned because he was dead…It defies easily-understood simple medicine…
JASON says: You said consecutive bottles of wine were poured into Jimi. He would be dead from the drowning and not be vomiting. The alcohol would drown him first causing death since you claim he was unconscious from pills.
BUSTER says: Jason offers a retard’s version of forensics that would be laughed-out of any serious venue…He stupidly (trollishly) fails to realize that there would be little to no registration of the wine’s alcohol in the liver or tissues because there wasn’t time for the alcohol to be absorbed…In fact that is part of our forensic case – that there was too much wine with too little blood alcohol for Jimi to have introduced the wine himself…
JASON says: Jimi’s liver recorded toxic levels of barbiturates that is documented in the autopsy. You are claiming Jimi was “still alive” enroute to the hospital to have “life saving procedures” to have his lungs drained. The wine drowning you claim happened was several hours earlier. So, all that alcohol would have had plenty of time to absorb into Jimi’s liver. The barbiturates did and so would the alcohol. The fact no alcohol registered in Jimi’s liver proves you and Fraud Bannister are full of shit.
BUSTER says: Jason incompetently ignores that 9 Vesparax cannot cause that kind of vomiting…Especially in a person with a known tolerance…Jason keeps saying the Vesparax caused the vomiting but he won’t be able to produce any other case where the victim took 9 Vesparax and vomited that way…This totally refutes Jason, but he ignores it and re-enters the same claim in the next post…
JASON says: People don’t take 9 Vesparax pills all at once. And I’ve already posted medical documented evidence from earlier this year from a person who took less than 6 Vesparax and died in 20 minutes. Jimi took 9 and all the forensic analysis from the autopsy proved it was toxic to Jimi’s system.
“Dr Rufus Crompton concluded that the barbiturate level in Hendrix’s blood, 0.7 mg/100 ml, was above the toxic level of 0.5 mg/100 ml”- Rolling Stone
BUSTER says: Jason stupidly ignores that the ambulance men noted unusual gurgling sounds coming from Jimi when they transported him…That was the wine Jimi was bloated with…Jason ignores that the ambulance men said a hard cork of vomit was blocking Jimi’s throat therefore no wine would pour from Jimi…Jason is stupid because if the wine were that accessible the ambulance men would have removed it right there…
JASON says: More horseshit from this serial troll. I was waiting for your “fake hard cork of vomit” claim. Neither Saua or Jones ever said anything about “hard vomit”. They said it was dry all the way down.
There was nothing “unusual” about gurgling sounds. That’s what happens when someone dies, dumbass. That is normal. And you’re supposed to be a “medical expert”? So, John Saua confirmed Jimi was already dead so there would be no reason for phony “procedures” at the hospital. You keep destroying your hoax yourself. Hilarious!
“When we moved him the gasses were gurgling. You get that when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant.”- John Saua
BUSTER says: Jason lies and says the ambulance men did not note any wine in the vomit…This isn’t true because one of them said there were “great pools of vomit” around Jimi…”Pools” connotes a high liquid content…
JASON says: More b.s. from lying serial troll Buster cuz they both said the vomit was dry. Not one word about “liquid content”. Show me where Saua or Jones said there was “wine” in their official statements.
“I mean the vomit was dry and there was a hell of a lot of it.”- John Saua
“The vomit was dry indicating that Jimi had been in that condition for some time”- Reginal Jones
BUSTER says: Jason is a sick troll and internet scum…The witnesses of the wine he slanders and tries too hard to deny were there at the time and are credible…Jason is just an internet asshole trolling the subject…Sharon got Monika to admit the wine in an incriminating way…The rest falls in to place…
JASON says: Buster is a banned lying fraud. Sharon Lawrence was never inside the Samarkand when Jimi died from an overdose. There was nothing incriminating since no wine was found and Sharon Lawrence confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose suicide. Buster is a kook posting bogus debunked conspiracy theories.
BUSTER says: Jason is lying and I never once said Jimi was “force-fed pills”…He was set-up to take them and Monika willingly provided them…
JASON says: Buster makes up so many fake stories he forgets what he says. Buster still doesn’t understand after an entire year that he can’t get away with his bogus lies and phony story changes. We have them all ready to go to refute him with just like this one below.
“BUSTER says: the pills being shoved down Jimi’s throat by the murderers. Jimi’s barbiturate level showed that the pills had been inside him for about 2 hours”
JASON says: Buster got BUSTED again. Here he clearly said “pills being shoved down Jimi’s throat by murderers”. That was Tappy “The Fraud” Wright’s bogus claim and Buster used to use it for his hoax until he changed it. Just another one of the many times Buster changed his fake stories. Buster is a very poor scam artist.
BUSTER says: Jason is trolling semantics and intentionally misquoting the context of my words…He knows as well as I that what I was saying was no one would have to restrain Jimi to force the wine in to him because he had a .7mg barbiturate blood level…Jason is dishonestly trying to squeeze dishonest meaning out of semantics and misquotes, which would earn him censure in any credibly moderated forum…
JASON says: No, I’m posting legitimate sources and documented evidence refuting and debunking serial troll Buster who pathologically lies with phony fictional claims. Look at how many times I’ve debunked him in this comment with facts, medical evidence, and real sources. Buster is a serial troll making up fake claims and never produces legitimate sources or documented evidence cuz he has none for his fake imaginary wine and phony procedures that never happened.
When Buster is debunked, he changes his fake stories into something new so he can claim he won the “debate”. Buster is banned from every moderated forum he goes on for making up bogus claims and never producing any evidence.
BUSTER says: Jason is switching the subject to this “bloating” business because he badly failed to account for his version via the lung autopsy…He was publicly unable to account for why vomit was only found in the small bronchi and not the rest of the lung if there was no wine?…If you can’t answer that you lose…That’s how evidence works…Jason couldn’t answer it…And the rest of his idiotic arguments don’t serve as any substitute…
JASON says: No, I’m not switching any subject. You are trying to disguise a phony wine drowning for Jimi’s drug overdose. Being drowned in bottles of wine would not cause vomiting when you claim Jimi was unconscious from pills. The wine would cause severe bloating cuz the wine would have nowhere to go. Look at pictures of drowning victims. They are bloated and the lungs show severe signs of a drowning. Teare did not see any of that which is why your hoax is dead.
For a decade, Buster has failed to produce medical documents for his claim of wine being inside Jimi’s lungs. If there was wine, it would have been documented. Wine was never found in Jimi’s lungs or the analyzed fluid during the autopsy. That kills his bogus hoax.
Kathy Etchingham reviewed every Hendrix medical record and there was nothing documented about “wine” or phony procedures. Jimi was declared dead on arrival from a drug overdose and Buster can’t produce one single document to overturn it. All we get from him is old and new fake claims and stories as he is easily debunked.
Hi Jason, Those poor drowning victims are a good example of bloating having ingested all that water. With all that imaginary wine being poured into Jimi he would have been filled with alcohol. Funny how Dr.Teare missed all that wine.
Those are unintelligent answers you are giving, Jason, to intelligent arguments you obviously can’t answer…You are ignoring the fact that no recorded Vesparax death ever resulted in such extreme vomiting…You won’t be able to find any 9 tablet Vesparax fatality where the victim vomited as extremely as Jimi did…The simple reason for that is the drowning in wine caused that vomiting, not the barbiturate…You’re getting sloppy Jason and you are not following either the facts of the case or known medical science…
If you asked any medical expert if forced drowning in wine would cause extreme vomiting they would assure you it would…Your claim that Jimi would not vomit because he was dead from drowning is quite idiotic and quite in conflict with basic medical science…You’re just an idiotic troll offering child-like defiance…You would be quite dead in any serious venue or formal review…
You are an idiot Jason who is quite incapable of following a simple forensic argument…The undigested rice found in Jimi’s stomach not only proved Jimi died no later than 5:30am but it also proved normal body functions shut down at that time…Therefore no alcohol was absorbed minutes after Jimi vomited-out…The alcohol did not get absorbed in to Jimi’s liver because those digestive body functions had ceased…Jason is making up voodoo science and trying to assert alcohol levels in the liver and blood that were impossible by medical science…(He doesn’t know what he’s talking about)…Jason is stupid because Teare noted that all of Jimi’s organs were in “exceptionally healthy condition” (no liver damage)…
Jason is lying…No one died after taking less than 6 Vesparax…Jason is a sick fucker because he is just pulling that one out of his ass…There is no person who died from taking 6 Vesparax or less…Jason is lying…Jason is a moron who is too stupid to understand the barbiturate science I posted that makes it quite clear a person with no tolerance requires 2000mg of barbiturate to reach Lethal Dose…6 Vesparax is only 1200mg of barbiturate so it is medically impossible for a person to overdose on 6 Vesparax…Even 9 Vesparax wasn’t enough to kill Jimi who had a notorious tolerance…9 Vesparax only contains 1800mg of barbiturate which wasn’t enough to cause overdose in Jimi….He also didn’t have the pills inside him long enough…No matter how many times you post this correct version the denial troll moron Jason ignores it…Jason then lies and uses semantic tricks to imply “toxic” means “lethal”…It does not…Jason has already been informed that the Vesparax manufacturer listed Lethal Dose as “9 or 10 tablets”…One of the autopsy doctors said quite plainly that .7mg was not a fatal level…I have posted this repeatedly yet Jason ignores it and re-enters that idiotic dodge he wrote above that doesn’t give any credible answer to what I just spelled-out…Jason would be booted from any credibly overseen debate for doing that…And if you look at his answer he never answered the point that Jason will never be able to produce any other Vesparax fatality where the victim vomited profusely like Jimi…When caught Jason switches the subject and doesn’t answer what you wrote…
What the ambulance men were hearing was gas bubbling around in the large amount of wine in Jimi’s body…No matter how hard Jason trolls it there was a quote from one of the ambulance men saying there was a hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat that their ambulance suction device could not penetrate…That hard plug of vomit did indeed cork-in the wine behind it…Jason is doing a piss poor job of denying the obvious wine that the ambulance men heard gurgling inside Jimi – which is why they mentioned it…
Suau: ” He was in a pool of vomit, it was everywhere, but we are not doctors, it’s our job to keep trying till we get him to the hospital, we can’t proclaim him dead…I vaguely remember taking a sample of the vomit in a container, because we didn’t know what he had taken. So as soon as the police arrived, we were off. I was in the back with Jimi, Reg drove. When we moved him, the gases were gurgling, you get when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant. The vomit was all the way down, we couldn’t have got an airway down. ” ~ Jason is a sick troll who just argues against the obvious facts…A pool of vomit has to have a high liquid content…It had dried 6 hours later when the wine got absorbed in to the bedding…There you see Suau describing it as a “pool”…
Jason is a sick pup because he clipped what I wrote in order to create false context…He would be banned for that alone in any credible room…I have always maintained that Monika gave Jimi the pills as part of a set-up…
I won this debate because Jason once again trolled blather instead of answering the question “How could Jimi have vomit in the small bronchi and no vomit in the main lung if there was no wine?”…This is the 3rd time I’ve asked it and it is the 3rd time Jason blabbered around it without being able to answer it…
Jason, skip the trolling bullshit and just answer that one question in your reply…
The reason you refuse to answer it is because I have you by the balls and it is proof of the wine (you fucking pathetic troll)…
Hi Jason, I know we’re said this before but I think it’s worth repeating that if Jimi was covered in all that wine it surely would have raised the suspicion of the ambulance attendants. They would have questioned how this wine, five bottles in total, got all over Jimi. But they made no mention of wine only that it looked like a drugs overdose of which they saw many.
Hi Ivana,
Buster rehashes the same bogus claims over and over. Everything he uses for his hoax we have debunked last year and earlier this year.
John Saua and Reginal Jones saw Jimi dead before anybody else. They had the first look at Jimi and were the few men who witnessed the actual death scene. That’s why their testimony is so damaging to Buster the hoaxer. No doctor witnessed it, Buster, or any of these fraudsters claiming wine. So for them to claim something is there that they never saw is completely asinine.
Buster the serial troll claims this was “brutal murder scene” with “gallons of wine all over the bed and Jimi”. He has no evidence of it but makes up this fraudulent claim. If that was the case, that’s the first thing both ambulance men would have described. They both would have vividly described gallons of wine all over the place and on Jimi. Both men never saw any wine on the pillows, the bed or on Jimi Hendrix. They both in graphic detail described dry vomit they witnessed and not a peep about phony wine.
The entire room would have smelled from alcohol. Neither man mentioned a smell of alcohol. If Jimi was covered in wine, they would have felt it, saw it on his clothes, and smelled it on Jimi’s body when they were doing examinations checking his vitals. They reported nothing of the kind.
John Saua said looking at the scene was a drug overdose and he scooped up a sample of Jimi’s vomit to be analyzed to see which kind of drugs he took. Reginal Jones said Jimi choked on vomit and never said anything about wine or being “drowned” in it.
Then we have Officer Ian Smith who said “he received a lot of drug overdose calls like that in those days”. He recognized it was a drug overdose as well. They had no idea who Jimi Hendrix was and thought he was just a dead junkie that OD’d. That’s why they took his dead body away. A junkie is a drug user and not a wine drinker. If there was this “brutal wine drowning murder scene”, Officer Smith would have sealed off the flat for an immediate investigation.
Also, coroner’s officers combed the flat looking for evidence. They took Monika’s pills and several blankets for analysis and no wine turned up on those either. So, 2 ambulance men and officers saw no wine. And a person who cleaned the flat also said they never witnessed wine in the room in gallons as well.
So, two ambulance men and a cop saw no wine on the body of Jimi Hendrix and then magically Buster wants to claim wine appeared on Jimi at the hospital for his hoax. Well, Dr. Bob Brown saw Jimi dead before any other doctor did and he never saw any wine either. He confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose as did St. Mary Abbotts Hospital.
So, where is all this gallons of wine at the Samarkand that Buster wants to claim was there? Nowhere to be found. Nobody saw it or on Jimi Hendrix. Thats why this is so damaging to Buster aka Albert Doyle cuz he needs to make up an excuse for wine that was never there. His only recourse is to play word games claiming “vomit means wine” and a “pool is liquid wine” when both men said it was brown vomit and the vomit was dry. Nothing “red” was ever detected and Buster says it was “red wine”. Hoaxer Buster was never there to witness the death scene and knows nothing about what these men testified to so his garbage claims are irrelevant.
So, 3 men who witnessed a dead Hendrix first saw no wine on the bed or Jimi’s body. Buster can’t claim wine on Jimi’s body after the fact when the men who saw Jimi first never saw it. That’s why Buster’s phony hoax is dead in the water as he drowns in his hoaxing lies of fake imaginary wine..glub glub glub.
Let the excuses and word games begin from hoaxing troll Buster desperately still claiming imaginary wine.
Jason ignores and never answers:
1) That he cannot find any other Vesparax overdose case where the victim vomited profusely like Jimi…Extreme vomiting does not occur with Vesparax overdoses…It is, however, something that would occur in forced-drowning deaths…
2) Jason contemptuously refuses to acknowledge that the giant “pool” of vomit Suau spoke of was a good percentage liquid when it was first disgorged…It soaked in to the cloth bedding and turned in to mostly dry vomit by the time the ambulance men got there because 6 hours had passed…Jason refuses to acknowledge this because it disproves his lie that there was only dry vomit…The vomit may have been dry when Suau saw it but the original liquid pool was still visible to him when he described it…The ambulance men assumed the evidence of its liquid nature and wine smell was simply part of the vomit and saw no need to distinguish the wine in a separate description…
3) Jason dishonestly ignores that the clean-up crew spent hours cleaning the death scene so we have no idea what the original death scene looked like…
4) Jason never answered for his claim that a person died from 6 Vesparax because he made it up…He’s a crazy liar, in other words, doing demented trolling and pulling things out of his ass…
5) The gurgling sounds the ambulance men heard were gas bubbles shifting around in the large volume of wine inside Jimi after they had moved him…
6) Jason is in contemptuous denial of David Kramer’s video of Dr Seifert saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…Jason is delusional and not connected to reality because when Kramer releases that video it will prove that the ambulance men witnessed it too…Wine that was detectable in the hospital is obviously wine that was even more detectable at the death scene…Seifert’s wine will then corroborate Bannister’s wine and prove the suctioning of the large amount of wine in Jimi’s lungs…The wine Seifert witnessed all over Jimi was wine spilled in the act of pouring it down his throat and killing him with it…Jason is unwell because he thinks he is going to avoid this inevitable proof…
7) I’ve won this debate because Jason refuses to answer a straight argument of evidence…I asked him to answer how there could be no vomit in the main lung if there was no wine and Jimi died of choking on vomit?…Jason refused to answer…In a court situation Jason would lose the case right there…Teare only found vomit in the small bronchi…The small bronchi are the furthest extent of the lungs…If there was no wine then the only way vomit could be in the small bronchi is if other vomit pushed it there…And if there was no procedure then the vomit would still be in there…But that is not what we see in Teare’s autopsy…We see no vomit in the main lung and vomit only in the small bronchi…This is forensic proof that the vomit in the main lung mixed with the large amount of wine and got suspended within it…When Bannister suctioned the wine out the vomit went with it…Vomit remained in the small bronchi because Bannister’s suction device could not suction it out…This is proof of the wine…So much so that Jason literally cannot answer it and his idiotic trolling diversions are not any adequate substitute…Liquids would be more likely to send material deep in to the lungs to the small bronchi, which is even more proof that Jason stupidly can’t answer…
Jimi Hendrix vomited from a drug overdose and vomiting is common from an overdose since the drugs are poisoning the system . In your fake wine drowning, Jimi could not vomit cuz you claimed he was filled up with wine from his stomach to his throat. Your fake story makes it impossible for Jimi to vomit and you know it. That’s why you are so angry and change your stories.
John Saua saw dey vomit and there was nothing red in color depicting wine. You falsely claimed there was a “brutal wine drowning” with gallons of wine all over the place. No you’re changing your story making more bogus claims.
You weren’t there so you have no clue what the death scene looked like. You claimed gallons of wine was all over the place. Jimi was covered in dry vomit so nobody was “cleaning” the room. There wasn’t any wine and the person who cleaned the room never witnessed any fake wine either.
Posted below is a 1978 case of a person who died in 20 minutes from taking 5 Vesparax.
There was no “large volume of wine” John Saua said that’s normal for dead people. You are lying and you were never there to know.
Made up conspiracy crap you made up. Kramer’s video is irrelveant. Jimi had a lethal 0.7 barbiturate blood level and you can’t get that from wine, it only comes drugs and that’s why you will always lose.
Buster lost his hoax forever cuz he makes up bogus stories and changes them all the time. 8-10 years ago he was arguing that there was no vomit and only “clear wine” in Jimi’s lungs. Now 8 years later he changed his story to argue vomit as he makes up another fake story. This is why Buster will always lose, he lives in contradiction debunking his own fake stories. You can’t argue “no vomit” and change to “vomit” when you are debunked with your original fake claim. Here is Buster arguing “no vomit and clear wine with his infamous alias “Scrum Drum.
Scrum Drum: I’ve been involved with research over this in the last two years and spoke to Dr Bannister in person two weeks ago. There’s absolutely no doubt Jimi Hendrix was murdered. Dr Bannister described to me how he took at least 20 minutes to remove “bottles worth” of red wine from Jimi’s lung’s in hospital. He is adamant that Jimi was drowned in clear red wine not containing any vomit that he removed before their failed attempt to resuscitate him. I suggest you ignore people who ridicule this because they obviously haven’t done any serious research.
Jumping onto the bloated bandwagon. Those gurgling sounds are produced by a dead body, and not the wine. The wine was absorbed into the blood stream and bladder and it would certainly have had time to be absorbed into other tissues given that Jimi died hours earlier yet the barbiturates caused liver damage in that amount of time. The only alcohol Dr. Teare witnessed and mentioned was the levels in the blood and urine which was consistent with what Jimi drank during the evening. The fluid in Jimi’s lungs was produced by a dying body and is in no way testimony of wine being present. You will never outsmart Jason or myself with your pseudo medical jargon and limited knowledge of the real facts.
Some of us continue to peddle the lies and misinformation that was written in two books by Tappy Wright and the Aleem Twins about Jimi being murdered by his manager with wine. No such information existed immediately after Jimi died. It’s obvious to anyone with any degree of intelligence that this story was invented years later in order to sell books, and in no way resembles what really happened to Jimi. Unfortunately some of us have not understood this simple fact and have continued to hang on and spread this inaccurate information wasting years on a lie.
Hi THA13, Good to have you on board. Just saw the Cory Washington interview and nothing will make me believe that Jimi was murdered just by the fact that Dr. Teare found no signs of violence during the autopsy. I think people who push conspiracy theories are just out to draw attention to themselves or to make money out of it.
Hi Jason, Jimi weighed 70kg and was 1.78cm tall one bottle of wine maximum two would have knocked him out let alone six. I remember reading that he couldn’t handle excessive amounts of alcohol which is why he was arrested in Stockholm for destroying his hotel room. This wine drowning story is just too crazy. Glub, glub, glub.
Hi Ivana,
Yes, Jimi was very aggressive when drinking and was a different person as documented by Kathy Etchingham. He couldn’t drink all that alcohol and as noted wasn’t a big wine drinker.
This stupid “Jimi had a famous tolerance to drugs” claim is bogus too. Jimi took drugs but wasn’t immune to them like our hoaxing ‘friend’ Buster says. Jimi couldn’t even handle 5 or 6 Mandrax before a concert in Denmark. He was unable to even perform and passed out.
So, how the hell could he tolerate 35 Mandrax pills which is the equivalent of 9 Vesparax pills, which 9 Vesparax is 18 times the amount of the prescription?
Then our hoaxing troll Buster says Jimi could take up to 3000 to 4000mg of Vesparax which would equal 72 Mandrax pills all at once. Damn stupid.
This hoax is a joke.
Jason is full of shit and pulling lies out of his ass once again…Ivana is too stupid to realize she is proving our points for us once again…What an idiot…
Jimi’s tolerance for drugs was well-known amongst his friends…Denying it just confirms Jason’s idiotic troll status…Jason is a sick fuck who mostly exists within his obnoxious trolling universe…Any step outside of his malevolent bubble shows that most of what he says is disproven by the finer knowledge of Jimi he tramples…Multiple friends of Jimi’s witnessed his tolerance and spoke of it…Jason is trolling it in order to bait a response and get attention…
You can’t trust anything Jason says…He has no proof of the number of Mandrax Jimi took in Denmark…He’s just pulling that out of his ass…The word was it was a “hand full”…Jimi also washed it down with a pint of whiskey (something honest Jason conveniently omits)…Jimi never even passed-out during that reckless Mandrax adventure in Denmark – which, low and behold, proves his famous tolerance…Intelligence agencies study their targets…If Jimi was recklessly taking large amounts of pills it could be worked-in to a plausible cause of death in a covert assassination…Jason is a liar who takes evidence that backs me and trollishly reverses it using obnoxious lies…
I would have to see the Mandrax specs before I accepted any of Jason’s obnoxious figures…Jason is just contemptuously ignoring my correct determination of the amount of barbiturates in Vesparax…Lethal Dose goes by barbiturate amounts that Jason trollishly ignores every time I post it in order to revert to vague claims…It still stands that 9 Vesparax contains 1800mg of barbiturate and 2000mg is needed to reach Lethal Dose in a person with no tolerance…Despite Jason’s scatter gun useless claims above, he has still not credibly answered this firm barbiturate science that proves Jimi could not have overdosed or vomited from the Vesparax…
Associated Press 10/30/70: “Drug overdoses severely impaired his musical ability; at a show in 1970, for example, Hendrix had to step down from the stage after only three songs due to a 5 tablet sedative overdose.”
JASON says: Debunked again. This is documented evidence from 50 years ago proving Jimi took 5 Mandrax and couldn’t perform. This is well known REAL Hendrix history, that YOU don’t know cuz you are a troll and only make up bogus claims. Since Jimi collapsed on 5 Mandrax, there is no way he could take any more like you ridiculously claimed. 9 Vesparax equals 35 Mandrax and Jimi couldn’t even handle 5. So much for that bogus “famous tolerance” claim you made up.
I have a new name for our trolling clown. “Both Ways Buster”. He always makes bogus contradicting claims and wants to have it both ways.
I see he’s back to the nonsensical Dr. Thurston and imaginary wine claim.
This started from Hendrix fiction writer Sharon Lawrence who made up a second hand quote for her Jimi Hendrix fiction book.
I’ve thoroughly debunked this nonsense last August as my first major debunking of Buster’s bogus scam and he’s never recovered since. Scroll to the end of August 2019 and see my “Debunking of the phony imbibed wine theory”. It’s an excellent piece and destroys Buster’s bogus claim.
I’m going to be writing a new edition on Thurston and I do finally need to finish up the Fraud Bannister series with the rest of his lies.
But I wanted to touch upon “Both Ways Buster” with his fake wine regarding Teare and Thurston.
Dr. Thurston was emphatic that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose.
“The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication, but there is no evidence as to intention to commit suicide.”- Dr. Gavin Thurston
Dr. Thurston clearly said “barbiturates” was the cause of Jimi’s death and nothing about alcohol or a “stomach full of wine”. He was also emphatic that Jimi had no intention to commit suicide.
Well, 31 years later…con artist, money schemer, and fraudster Sharon Lawrence wrote her Jimi Hendrix fiction book claiming Jimi Hendrix committed suicide by taking 9 pills. She also invented a bizarre bullshit story about Jimi being fascinated in the occult and with the number 9. She said Jimi overdosed on 9 pills in a suicide pact. She then made up a bogus second hand quote claiming Dr. Thurston said Hendrix was “imbibed with wine” to an obscure reporter.
So, Lying Sharon Lawrence fraudulently said Jimi committed suicide 31 years later, when in 1970 renowned UK Coroner Dr. Gavin Thurston determined Jimi Hendrix did not commit suicide. Thurston was a medical expert and no evidence pointed to suicide, yet lying Sharon said Jimi killed himself in her fiction book.
To make matters worse, Sharon made up a fake quote invoking Dr. Thurston claiming he knew of wine when in 1970 when he emphatically determined it was barbiturates, and never said a word about wine in his final report. No wine existed in 1970. The bogus wine claims didn’t start until 1992 and Sharon wrote her book in 2001. So she had all those years to hear about fake wine inserting into her fiction rag.
Sharon Lawrence is discrediting a famous Coroner. She is lying claiming Jimi committed suicide when Thurston confirmed Jimi did not. Then she makes up a fake quote claiming Thurston told her obscure colleague reporter about wine. Sharon lied about the bogus Hendrix suicide and she’s lying about the fake wine Thurston quote too. What does she have against Thurston to smear this man? And this is the terrible liar “Both Ways Buster” uses as his main source for his debunked “Hendrix murder hoax”. Shame on you Buster.
Dr. Thurston died in 1980 so he can’t defend himself or refute Sharon’s lies. Her colleague Jack Meehan died way back in 1973 from a long illness. So, he can’t be contacted to refute her lies either. Precisely the reason she used two long time dead men for her fake fiction book. Used two decades long dead guys who can’t call her out on her lies. That’s what fraudsters do.
Sharon Lawrence also made up several other lies about Jimi Hendrix in her fiction book, including where he was born and even made up fake quotes about Jimi’s deceased mother. So, Sharon is no stranger to making up fake quotes as she did for Dr. Thurston. She is a fraudster looking for “hooks” in a book to make money. That is fake tabloid journalism, my friends.
Now for “Both Ways Buster”. He was claiming Teare had no knowledge of wine cuz he said Fraud Bannister sucked it all out 3 days earlier at the hospital. But “Both Ways Buster” just told us Fraud Bannister left wine inside Jimi’s stomach. So, when Teare did the autopsy all that wine would have been documented. So, “Both Ways Buster” blew it
again. Teare saw no wine during the autopsy or he would have documented it. So, since there was no wine in Jimi’s stomach, that debunks the bogus Thurston and wine claim as well. It’s easy to debunk these frauds. Will include more in my new Lying Sharon Lawrence series regarding the great Dr. Thurston.
In any credible forum or court room this is the point where Jason would be escorted out of the room in a straight jacket for showing a delusional lack of sense of reality and trying to conduct an already-refuted argument right in the face of evidence that disproved it…Remember that Jason is the person who, after repeated attempts to get him to answer for the lung forensics, ignored it and refused to do so…Jason could not answer for why there was no vomit in the rest of the lung if there was no wine and no procedure?…Jason depends on a false house of cards that is constructed from his deliberate lies but once his false scenario is walked-through it collapses under its feeble preposterousness – which is why Jason can’t even muster a word of response to my lung forensics evidence…If Jason’s claim that there was no wine and no procedure were true then the entire lung would be full of vomit…The small bronchi are the furthest extent of the lung so science requires that for vomit to be in them means that other vomit had to push it there (if there was no wine)…But we go to Teare’s lung autopsy and that is not what we see…What we see in Teare’s lung autopsy is vomit in the small bronchi and nowhere else…This is fatal to Jason’s lie that there was no wine because if there was no wine the rest of the lung would have to exhibit vomit in it in order for it to have pushed in to the small bronchi…Forensic physiology would tell you that the medium that would be more likely to push vomitus in to the small bronchi would be fluids since they would leave evidence of complete penetration of the lungs…Those same fluids would leave the rest of the lung free of vomit if a suctioning procedure had been done where the vomit that was suspended in that fluid had been suctioned out with that fluid…This is precisely what we see in Teare’s lung autopsy and it indeed proves the wine on a scientific basis – which is why the obnoxious troll Jason refuses to even acknowledge it…Jason refuses to answer this because it is proof beyond any doubt of the wine…The reason Jason is certifiable is because in real world reality you don’t get to troll further past evidence that refutes you…In the adult world where you are held accountable for correct evidence you trollishly ignore you don’t get the opportunity to further troll and insult the intelligence of those who have disproven you…
What this shows is that once we have proven wine in the lungs then we can assume Thurston’s quote of “Jimi’s stomach contents showing he had imbibed a large amount of red wine” is true because it is backed up by this forensic evidence of wine in the lungs…Jason offers a moron’s version that is obviously seeking to do simple-minded denial…More intelligent, sophisticated analysis tells you that Sharon Lawrence was seeking to prefer a suicide explanation for Jimi’s death…Therefore she was not seeking to plant lies about Jimi being drowned in wine by evidencing Thurston witnessing the wine…If we disconnect from Jason’s retarded version and moronic trolling we can surmise that Lawrence’s claim of Thurston witnessing the wine is true because she wasn’t trying to suggest a drowning in wine cause of death…Lawrence was trying to suggest a Russian Roulette barbiturate overdose where Jimi took the magic number 9 pills and killed himself…So therefore she didn’t really have any motive to add the real homicidal drowning in wine cause of death since it went against her theory…So it stands to logical reason that Lawrence’s claim is true and accurate since she had no reason to invent it…Another thing that shows Lawrence’s claim is true is the fact they buried that quote along with Meehan’s article…
The reason Jason is a sick pup is because only a mentally unsound person would continue to lie and troll at this point knowing he is doomed…Jason knows that at some point David Kramer is going to release his video with Seifert saying “Jimi was covered in red wine”…When Kramer releases that video all the crazy bullshit and obnoxious lies Justin has allowed Jason to troll his comments section with will all be proven to be lying, trolling bullshit…Seifert’s comment will prove that the whole chain of evidence before Seifert’s witnessing is all real and all confirms the wine…That means Thurston’s comment and my lung forensics will all be validated since Seifert’s wine will back-fill and extrapolate to the rest of the evidence…So only a mentally unsound person would still be trolling wine-denying lies at this point because anyone of any sound mental faculties at this point would realize denial of the wine is doomed…
Jason is a sick internet creep whose only credentials on this is trolling Justin’s comments section…The people he maligns are serious players, professionals, and direct associates of Jimi’s who were there at the critical places and times involved…Only fools would take Jason’s idiotic calling of all the people who disprove him liars seriously…Rank deniers should never be given any credibility or format…
What Buster is posting is irrelveant and fiction. He is claiming Jimi had “procedures” performed on him at St. Mary Abbotts Hospital. There isn’t one medical report from St. Mary Abbots Hospital that documents Jimi had his “lungs or stomach suctioned out” or was given “oxygen treatments” by Fraud Bannister. Not one document that states Jimi was “covered in wine”. Yet, Buster claims all this happened and he can’t come up with one single document.
St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed Jimi Hendrix was declared dead on arrival and died from a drug overdose in their official statement to the media. Dr. Bob Brown was present during this media press conference. They never confirmed Jimi had “life saving procedures” or was “covered in wine” cuz it never happened. The fake claims didn’t start until 1992 which is why these frauds never can produce any hospital records. It never happened. So, there was no “lungs full of wine” with Buster’s fake tale and his “forensic fantasy”.
As usual, hoaxing troll Buster is trying to “tell us what someone really meant” after he’s been debunked. He does this to keep his scam going with new fake claims. “Both Ways Buster” has no idea what “Sharon meant”. The fact is, Sharon is a liar who made up a degrading story against Jimi Hendrix to sell books.
Dr. Thurston confirmed Jimi Hendrix did not commit suicide. Yet Sharon lied 31 years later saying he did. There was absolutely no reason for her to even suggest Jimi killed himself because that is a lie. Then she went far enough to concoct this bullshit occult claim of Jimi making some weird pact to kill himself.
Dr. Thurston also made clear that barbiturates was the cause of Jimi’s death. Again, Sharon Lawrence made up a fake lie claiming Thurston told her obscure colleague about wine. Thurston never is on the official record making a statement on wine. This is coming from serial liar Sharon Lawrence who makes things up. Buster uses her lies cuz it fits with his phony narrative. Since this crap is coming from Lawrence no credible researcher even acknowledges it. This is pure fiction for the gullible. Anybody who would lie in a book with a bizarre Jimi Hendrix suicide story will lie about anything.
David Kramer is irrelveant. Ambulance men John Saua and Reginal Jones saw no wine on Jimi Hendrix and they saw him first. Officer Ian Smith saw Hendrix too and saw no wine. All 3 of them said Jimi died from a drug overdose. You can’t have magic wine appear after the fact when no wine was witnessed first at the flat. Also, Dr. Bob Brown never saw any wine on Jimi and he was the first doctor to see Jimi. And, Dr. Martin Siefert later confirmed he saw no alcohol on Jimi Hendrix. So, you can’t use conflicting statements for your scam.
If Jimi was covered in “all this wine” as Buster the hoaxer claims, then a St. Mary Abbotts Hospital medical report would have stated it and St. Mary Abbotts Hospital would have told this to the media during their press conference. No medical report and no hospital statement cuz it never happened. Fake decades later after the fact claims does not make it true. No evidence exists.
Hi Jason, The word “clearly” that Dr.Thurston used is really important because there is no doubt what caused Jimi’s death. It was obviously a drugs overdose. Jimi took the Vesparax willingly as there was no internal injury or external signs of violence. Dr Thurston agreed with Dr Teare’s autopsy report.
David Kramer has been working on this “documentary” for the past 16 years. I hope one day we will get to see it. If it’s a serious piece of work then there will be no mention of Jimi being murdered if it does I see no reason to keep watching.
Every year it’s supposed to come out. No wine was witnessed at the flat or by Bob Brown and that’s all that matters. Jimi’s lethal reading was 0.7 and you can’t get a
lethal reading from wine, it comes from drugs. That always kills this hoax.
Buster I suggest you go and start your own thread somewhere else and leave this thread to people who have real knowledge of Jimi Hendrix. You have wasted 10 years of your life promoting a murder that never happened. 🤥
Kathy’s investigation left no stone unturned; if there was ever an opportunity to uncover something dubious that was it. But it didn’t uncover any sinister murder plot by Michael Jeffrey or Monika because you can’t investigate a fantasy, what it did do was reaffirm the original findings of Dr. Teare and Dr. Thurston.
Hi Ivana,
Buster is a weak troll. He tries to claim Jimi wouldn’t vomit on 9 Vesparax when people vomit on one antibiotic if they have an allergic reaction to it. Jimi took 18 times the amount of a powerful drug that equaled 35 barbiturates. So of course he vomited on it cuz both the ambulance men and police witnessed it. Then St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed it was an overdose. Dr. Bob Brown was at the hospital press conference when it was confirmed. He even said it in several interviews Jimi died of a drug overdose. Then the autopsy showed Jimi’s 0.7 lethal barbiturate level that was detected by Teare. You can’t have that number from a wine drowning. 0.5 is toxic. Jimi’s was at 0.7 which is lethal. Dr. Rufus Crompton said that toxicity destroyed Jimi’s liver and would have died anyway if he didn’t suffocate on the vomit. Buster tries to argue against science with fiction.
Dr. Thurston made a point to say Jimi ‘clearly’ died from barbiturates and did not commit suicide. He wanted this to be set in stone to leave no doubt.
Buster is so dumb that he has no idea how stupid he looks arguing about vomit in Jimi’s lungs when he is claiming wine was poured down Jimi’s throat instead. It is impossible to vomit when consecutive bottles of wine are being poured. All that liquid will kill him before he could vomit. How can Jimi vomit when the idiot said liquid wine was flooding his lungs and throat? The pillows would have been stained red. Saua and Jones said the vomit was brown.
Teare found no wine in Jimi’s lungs cuz the vomit showed no abnormal amount of wine in it and neither did the fluid that was analyzed. He found rice in Jimi’s stomach and no “belly full of wine”. Sharon Lawrence is a terrible liar for making that up and Buster pathetically defends her saying “this is what she really meant”. No, she lied saying Jimi killed himself which is a lie.
Buster keeps lying about what John Saua said. Saua said there was gas noises from Jimi being dead like all people make. Buster keeps lying saying it’s from phony wine. This serial troll sure is desperate. So, this fool admits Jimi is dead but has him undergoing emergency medical “procedures” by Fraud Bannister sucking out imaginary wine. Buster admitted Jimi died at 5:30 so there’s no way he is going to be worked on 6 hours later when Fraud Bannister said Jimi was dead on arrival already decomposing.
Buster can only argue against Jimi’s overdose claiming he didn’t have enough pills. The 0.7 lethal reading proves that Jimi did and nothing will ever change it. Then he uses bogus claims from Sharon Lawrence as his main source.
The reason this wine scam is a hoax cuz if there was all this wine there would be at least one medical document that says something about abnormal wine and an alcohol death. St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose to the media.
If somebody today went to the hospital covered in wine the hospital report wouid document that any any procedure that took place. For Jimi Hendrix? Nothing. Why? Cuz this never happened. The phony claims didn’t start until 1992. You can’t have evidence when it never happened in the past. Kathy Etchingham did a through investigation and saw nothing about wine or procedures on Jimi’s medical records or autopsy. She even read Jimi’s music contracts and Jeffery had no reason to kill Jimi and Kathy says this whole thing is bogus just like the late Bob Levine. Buster wants to argue nonsense to win a “debate”. We defeated him with facts, documented evidence, medical science, and expert witness testimony. Not one single shred of evidence of fake wine. Only phony stories. 0.7 is lethal and can never be argued against. That comes from drugs, not fake and phony imaginary wine.
Hi Jason, Buster keeps making a fool of himself but he doesn’t have any kind of following if anything he’s thrown off most threads because of his lies. This is the only place left open to him to promote his conspiracy hoax. Nothing Buster says can change the fact that Jimi died of barbiturate intoxication and not alcohol intoxication. Dr Teare would never have confused the two. Buster is the one who’s having the problem understanding it. Jimi mistakenly took someone else’s medication not knowing anything about this particular drug that unfortunately cost him his life. It’s pretty simple to understand but conspiracy theorists like Buster complicated the story by adding a murder plot that never happened implicating innocent people. What a fool!
Jason is struggling against the noose and pulling it tighter…Every time you nail him with the facts he tries to switch the subject…His entries are trollishly evasive and avoid answering that was actually written every time…
As I said, Jason cannot produce a single other case of any Vesparax overdose victim vomiting to the degree Jimi did…When Jason mentions antibiotics he’s switching the subject in order to divert attention from the fact he’s come up with jack shit in the finding another victim who vomited like Jimi department…Being the troll he is, Jason then obnoxiously re-enters his lies once again that St Mary’s confirmed a drug overdose and the .7mg barbiturate blood content was “lethal”…Jason is a sick liar who is posting deliberate lies for trolling effect…When he posts those things he knows St Mary’s never “confirmed” any overdose…That’s what the autopsy was for…Jason also knows one of the autopsy doctors commented that .7mg was not a fatal amount…Jason has been referenced Glebbeek’s Vesparax overdose case histories where persons who took 1 to 6 more Vesparax than Jimi never vomited…The most they had was a strange red foam in the mouth but no massive vomiting…Jason knows he is lying which is why he ignores those directly, scientifically-analogous other cases…Jason also contemptuously ignores that no matter how many times he trolls a fantastic amount of pills that Jimi came up 200mg short in the barbiturate amount by which overdoses are scientifically measured…The reason Jason ignores this critical science and Jimi’s famous tolerance is because he knows it defeats his bullshit so he has to stay away from it like a vampire stays away from light…Trolls post things like “18 times the amount” and “35 barbiturates”, but they never venture near the real science that exposes the lie in that exaggeration…~.7mg is what real science goes by and it isn’t enough to kill someone – especially Jimi with his well-known tolerance…Jason knows this, which is why he lied and trolled like an obnoxious delinquent by saying .7mg was “lethal”…It also wouldn’t make someone vomit profusely…
Thurston had been brought in on the cover-up by then…Jason is a sick pup and is lying when he says Thurston never said to Meehan that Jimi’s stomach was full of red wine…Thurston had a legal and medical obligation to investigate the trace blood alcohol content vs the “large amount of red wine” he identified in Jimi’s stomach…Jason is a sick motherfucker because he is practicing this lying contempt right in the face of Kramer’s video that will prove Seifert also witnessed the wine…Once we have Seifert on record that Jimi was covered in wine then Thurston’s admission becomes automatic…The wine he mentioned filling Jimi’s stomach was the wine Seirfet saw spilled on Jimi when they poured it in to him…I wish I had a chance to interview Dr Thurston…
Again – Jason offers retarded stupidity when he says a person who is drowned in wine can’t vomit…Any expert will tell you that a person drowning that way will vomit every time…Just the fact we know Jimi was drowned in wine and vomited the way he did is proof enough…Jason’s idiotic defiance of simple facts, like he does here, shows why he is crazy enough to argue against the obvious evidence for Jimi’s murder…
Jason is lying…No fluid was analyzed…Jason himself claimed Teare was very thorough and would not miss anything…The 400ml of residual wine in Jimi’s left lung was never analyzed nor can Jason show any analysis of it in the autopsy…If Teare analyzed that residual wine he would have entered that analysis in the autopsy…Jason is a demented individual who is going to keep claiming the fluid was analyzed no matter how obvious it is that it wasn’t…
Thurston had to get the information of Jimi’s stomach being full of wine from someone…It had to be Teare because he examined the stomach…This proves the criminal cover-up…There are other signs of a cover-up in the evidence…Teare upping the drug levels and estimating a blood alcohol content being other examples…Jason is lying…Teare never examined the vomit or the wine in Jimi’s left lung…We assume the information about the large amount of wine in the lungs was never passed from St Mary’s to Teare…It actually may have been and Teare deliberately excluded it under covert orders…
It is quite obvious the gurgling noises Suau heard was gas moving around in Jimi because he was full of wine…When the ambulance men moved him they shifted gas pockets that produced those noises…Suau mentioned them because they were more prominent than usual because of the wine bloating…If people see a large amount of wine-bearing vomit they simply describe it as “vomit”…The vomit smell dominates so it is not honest to suggest those witnesses would separately describe its wine content…The wine is just assumed to be part of the vomit…Suau did however identify its obvious liquid content when he said it was in a big “pool”…Jason is in lying denial of this and desperate to think up excuses around it…
Jason has failed to answer the FACT that the only way there could be vomit in the small bronchi and none in the rest of the lung is if the vomit was suctioned-out with that wine…When Jason refused to answer that he lost the debate…
Jason is a sick person who should not be allowed to desecrate Jimi in this despicable manner…His intentional denial is beyond internet debate and veers in to malice with evil intent…Acting in defiant denial of Jimi’s murder to the degree Jason enthusiastically does is tantamount to criminal participation…We need to find out who Jason is and pursue him for this…His efforts are equal to accessory after the fact and obstruction of justice…This fucker needs to pay a price for this…
I need to quit this because I am wasting time at the cost of much more serious pursuits…Justin is to blame for giving safe harbor to Jason and his wicked intent…
Buster, I let you run for years when you were banned everywhere else, but I told you to leave me out of your crusade. I made it very clear to you that I didn’t want to see my name again. So, I’m going to assist you in having time for your “more serious pursuits” whatever they might be.
Hi Justin. You’ve done the right thing here. Some of the things said in this last post are way out of line and far from being normal. I hope Buster gets the help he needs.
I am left with the impression that “Buster” wished to be banned. I think he wanted out of this, but his pride would not let him fail to respond to something or to try to have the last word. So, he engaged in behavior that he knew on some level would get him blocked. As such, he can now feel like a martyr – the voice in the wilderness screaming out the truth – rather than someone who gave up.
I believe there is an important role for skeptics and conspiracy theorists in society as the official narrative on events should be questioned. I’m not saying that one must necessarily buy into the claims of an individual like Buster, but I do appreciate thought-provoking ideas and the fact that the matter was at least explored. I would have been content to let him stick around, but, unfortunately, as you said, he crossed a line for me. That, of course, takes me back to my first point though…
Hopefully, everyone can move on now. None of us were present at his death and so none of us can ever know for certain what happened. And, at this point, I’m not sure that matters. He’s gone and that can’t be changed. Even if he was murdered, those responsible are dead (or almost dead) now as well.
Justin, you’re absolutely right. This was Buster’s goal.
If you’ve witnessed his behavior on other platforms you know this is how he operates.
If Buster perceives you as a threat to his phony conspiracy theories he will begin to attack you hoping to undermine your credibility by calling you a “troll” or claim you “have no experience in the subject”. Then he will praise himself to elevate his stature over you by calling himself an “expert” and a “top researcher”.
When you start exposing his bogus theories as nonsense, he will become angry and call out to moderators to delete your posts or call for you to be banned on the grounds you are “maliciously doing harm to great research”.
After that fails and when he is exposed as a fraud, he will go into a tirade (not like he did on here) but enough to get himself banned. Then he goes to another site and trashes the owners for banning him claiming he was censored from publishing “the correct evidence”.
He did that here too, but the problem for him is there’s no more sites for him to participate cuz he’s banned from all of them. He got kicked off Amazon for trolling book reviews and Wikipedia for trying to change Michael Jeffery’s wiki page claiming he “murdered Hendrix” and that his plane accident was purposely done by Government Intel to silence him. He says they finally got to Dsnnmemann in 1996. 2 decades later lol.
Buster had more leeway than any other site but his last couple of comments were way over the top. Can he still read the comments or is he blocked from seeing them?
The main people in the death of Jimi Hendrix. 1. Monika Dannemann, girlfriend. 2. Eric Burdon, friend and singer. 3. Alvenia Bridges, girlfriend of Eric Burdon. 4. Mr. Saua and Mr. Jones ambulance officers. 5. Mr. Smith, police officer. 6. Drs, Seifert, Brown and Bannister, St Mary’s Hospital. 7. Gerry Stickells, road manager. 8. Dr. Teare, pathologist. 9. Dr. Thurston, coroner.
Buster has been soundly defeated and looks like a humiliated fool which is the reason for his irate outburst. The behavior he’s displayed here is the reason he’s banned from every website on the internet. Buster is incapable of having a discussion. When you refute his bogus hoax, he will attack you aggressively but this time went way over the top. He did that cuz he realizes that he can never refute the 0.7 lethal level found in Jimi Hendrix no matter how hard he tries. Fake imaginary wine can never produce a 0.7 lethal result in a body. Only drugs can do that. So, Buster’s only pathetic recourse is to pathetically deny 0.7 isn’t lethal and Jimi “couldn’t vomit on 9 Vesperax” which is asinine. What set Buster off is that I pointed out to him that people vomit on a simple antibiotic if they are allergic to it. And he’s claiming Jimi couldn’t vomit on a lethal dose of a powerful 3 combination barbiturate which he took 9 pills. If Buster wants to foolishly say 0.7 isn’t lethal, then Google a barbiturate toxicity blood level chart and see what you find.
Buster can pine away for his imaginary wine all he wants and a Kramer video isn’t proof of anything. 0.7 is a lethal amount of drugs and claimed wine on a body does not overturn anything. You can’t get a 0.7 reading with wine. It is drugs. There is no documented evidence of wine inside Jimi nor did St. Mary Abbotts Hospital ever state Jimi had wine on him. Jimi had no wine on his body at the Samarkand so it can’t magically appear later at the hospital.
Buster can only deny medical science and real life events cuz it destroys his hoax. His imaginary tales of phony wine and grand “cover ups” is only nonsense he made up in his crazy head. I will debunk all his nonsense again thoroughly in these next two comments. Buster makes the bogus claim that St. Mary Abbotts Hospital never confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose. Of course they did, and I’ve been posting this since last year. He refuses to believe documented evidence and instead invents his own crazy stories living in mad delusion. Hopefully Buster aka Brian “Albert” Doyle will seek some professional mental help to get his Jimi Hendrix delusions and severe anger under control.
BUSTER says: As I said, Jason cannot produce a single other case of any Vesparax overdose victim vomiting to the degree Jimi did…When Jason mentions antibiotics he’s switching the subject in order to divert attention from the fact he’s come up with jack shit in the finding another victim who vomited like Jimi department.
JASON says: As I said, your argument is bogus cuz Jimi Hendrix himself vomited on a lethal overdose. No, I am not switching the subject. I’m pointing out the fact of what a total moron you are. You are claiming that Jimi Hendrix couldn’t even vomit on a lethal overdose of Vesperax when people can have a terrible reaction vomiting profusely on a simple antibiotic. Your argument is asinine and I’ve made you look like a fool which is why you melted down and went berserk.
BUSTER says: Being the troll he is, Jason then obnoxiously re-enters his lies once again that St Mary’s confirmed a drug overdose and the .7mg barbiturate blood content was “lethal”…Jason is a sick liar who is posting deliberate lies for trolling effect…When he posts those things he knows St Mary’s never “confirmed” any overdose…That’s what the autopsy was for.
JASON says: Buster claims to be the “foremost authority on Jimi Hendrix” but it’s obvious he has no idea about any of Jimi’s real life history except for the conspiracy theories he invented in his crazy head. He also must have a reading comprehension problem or a learning disability. Since last year, I’ve posting documented evidence that St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose but Buster doesn’t want to believe it. Ambulance man John Saua scooped up a sample of Jimi’s vomit to be analyzed at the hospital to see which kind of drugs he took. That was the whole point of taking the vomit. Buster the moron posted that quote from Saua the other day. Also, a blood test would determine the amount of drugs in Jimi’s system. What the hell does Buster think a hospital is for? Is he this ignorant or just trolling? He does the same thing with Teare who accuses him of not analyzing fluid in Jimi’s chest when that was the whole purpose of the autopsy. Now to debunk Buster again. This is from the morning edition of The London Times on 9/19/70 the day after Jimi died. Read what it says. Now, this is documented evidence of what really happened to Jimi Hendrix. This is a real life past event. Not the phony spin Buster is selling you. St. Mary Abbotts Hospital confirmed it was a drug overdose, Buster. Read it many times and let sink in.
“Jimi Hendrix, the American pop singer and guitarist, died in London yesterday. He had been taken by ambulance from a flat in a private hotel in Notting Hill but was dead on arrival at St Mary Abbot’s Hospital, Kensington.
The cause of death was an overdose of drugs, said a St. Mary Abbots Hospital spokesman, but a post mortem examination would be carried out today. The police said it was in a flat where Mr Hendrix had died.”- The London Times 9/19/70
Like I’ve been saying, shortly after Jimi Hendrix was announced dead, St. Mary Abbotts Hospital held a media press conference to state the cause of Jimi’s death. Dr. Bob Brown was present during this media press conference. The hospital spokesman clearly stated “Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose” then all media outlets reported it. This was a real life actual event that happened. It can never be changed. The hospital confirmed Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose on 9/18/70. The hosptial CONFIRMED DRUGS Buster NOT WINE lol. Is it sinking in yet?
That’s why 21 years later when Fraud Bannister made up the fake wine claims it was a total hoax. He already confirmed 21 years before Jimi died of a drug overdose and never spoke of wine or fake procedures. That’s why Buster is a troll making up a fake conspiracy hoax. St. Mary Abbotts Hospital on the day Jimi Hendrix died, confirmed to the world that Jimi died from a drug overdose. You can’t change his death 21 years later and claim a phony “wine drowning”. It never happened and that’s why these hoaxer never have any evidence but only fake stories. It never happened. Jimi’s drug overdose was confirmed on 9/18/70. Buster’s hoax was easily demolished on this evidence and I’ve been posting this since last year. There was no fake wine and no phony procedures at the hospital. If there was, St. Mary Abbotts Hospital would have told us that in the press conference. There would be hospital documents of “wine” and “procedures”. There are none cuz it never happened. The hospital confirmed it was a drug overdose. This is history and it can never be overturned by hoaxers. Buster is proven once again to be the liar, fraud, and serial hoaxing troll that he is. He tries to suppress real events from the past and instead inserts his fictional tales of lunacy. You are debunked again Buster aka Brian “Albert” Doyle.
Hi Jason, We don’t need to deal with Buster’s delusions any longer, and instead focus on the truth. Hoaxers are good at inventing parallel stories that sit alongside what really happened to Jimi; they manipulate the facts to suit their agenda as we’ve seen over and over again here.
At the inquest, the Coroner Dr. Thurston stated that the reason Jimi took so many sleeping pills couldn’t be safely answered. He mentioned the sleeping pills and no other substance as being the cause of death. I think Monika should have been questioned a little more as it was her pills that Jimi took, and I’m sure she would have been able to answer Dr. Thurston’s question. Could it be that she was protecting herself?
Well, once again we have two phony contradicting stories from Buster aka Brian “Albert” Doyle. He makes up one fake story and when it’s debunked he makes up another one to keep the scam going. As, you can easily see from Buster’s first phony story, it would be physically impossible for Jimi to vomit when Buster the clown said Jimi was filled full of wine from his stomach to his mouth. He still has no idea his nonsensical made up “lung forensics” destroys his own wine hoax when he is arguing vomit from a drug overdose. Vomit is from a drug overdose and not a wine drowning. This idiot moron is arguing against his own wine hoax which is why we are all laughing at him. Read both his quotes carefully to see how impossible vomiting filled fill of wine is. Buster is a hoaxing serial troll who makes up the worst stories against Jimi Hendrix.
BUSTER says: I spoke to Dr Bannister personally and he told me that Jimi was drowned in at least 5 bottles of wine. He said when he opened Jimi’s mouth to resuscitate him that there was wine up to the throat…A clever detective would see that the amount of wine was wine that was poured in to Jimi until he could hold no more…This is called “overkill” in criminology to make sure the job was done…That same smart detective would realize that for wine to be up to the mouth would mean everything beneath it was flooded and that the volume of that flooding would be about 5 bottles of wine…
BUSTER says: Jason ignores and never answers:
1) That he cannot find any other Vesparax overdose case where the victim vomited profusely like Jimi…Extreme vomiting does not occur with Vesparax overdoses…It is, however, something that would occur in forced-drowning deaths…
Remember that Jason is the person who, after repeated attempts to get him to answer for the lung forensics, ignored it and refused to do so…Jason could not answer for why there was no vomit in the rest of the lung if there was no wine and no procedure?…Jason depends on a false house of cards that is constructed from his deliberate lies but once his false scenario is walked-through it collapses under its feeble preposterousness – which is why Jason can’t even muster a word of response to my lung forensics evidence…
If Jason’s claim that there was no wine and no procedure were true then the entire lung would be full of vomit…The small bronchi are the furthest extent of the lung so science requires that for vomit to be in them means that other vomit had to push it there (if there was no wine)…But we go to Teare’s lung autopsy and that is not what we see…What we see in Teare’s lung autopsy is vomit in the small bronchi and nowhere else…This is fatal to Jason’s lie that there was no wine because if there was no wine the rest of the lung would have to exhibit vomit in it in order for it to have pushed in to the small bronchi.
JASON says: Buster the serial troll cooked his Christmas goose early in July as he destroyed his own hoax with asinine tales of fake wine and his phony “forensics”.
Notice in the middle of his second quote Buster says: “Jason can’t even muster a word of response to my lung forensics evidence”. Buster used the word “my”, meaning “his forensics”. Buster is no doctor or pathologist and is just making this crap up himself. This is not documented Hendrix evidence, it’s complete nonsense coming from Buster’s crazy head. Buster doesn’t care about facts, documented evidence, or real life events. He only wants to “debate” with his fake Hendrix murder claim inventing ridiculous claims as he attempts to out argue you any way he can. Buster has nothing for his hoax cuz he is defeated on real documented evidence so he makes up his own stories to debate you with. This is a perfect example of that and he’s been doing this for over a decade. The reason he never beat me is that I don’t go down his rabbit hole to argue his fake claims. I defeat him on facts and real events. This is what outrages Buster so much.
Now let’s look at this original fake story in Buster’s first quote. Buster says, “Bannister told him” Jimi was filled full of ‘at least’ 5 bottles of wine. Buster goes on to say “wine was filled up to Jimi’s throat”. Buster concludes with “everything beneath Jimi’s throat was flooded with wine.”
So, using common sense looking at this fake wine story, it would be impossible for Jimi to be vomiting with wine flooding from Jimi’s mouth all the way down to his stomach. If Jimi was vomiting in this fake wine scenario as Buster in now claiming, there would be no wine flooding inside Jimi if he was vomiting in his original fake claim. Both of his stories are fake and both are debunked.
Buster’s fake and phony “murder by wine” claim is impossible. He claimed Jimi was “murdered in wine” with “wine filling him completely up from his stomach to his throat”. Jimi could not vomit profusely and still be filled up with all that wine from his mouth to his stomach. That’s why Buster’s wine scam is debunked right off the bat.
Jimi was vomiting from the lethal drug overdose cuz it caused respiratory failure making him unable to breathe. That was determined in the autopsy which is why fluid built up around his heart and went into his chest. A pathologist analyzes everything in the body and no wine was ever found in Jimi’s lungs, chest, or body in mass quantities. If Jimi’s entire insides of his body was soaked in wine, it would have been detected in the forensic analysis in Jimi’s autopsy. This is why Buster’s hoax is a scam and is easily debunked.
Buster was Richard Jimi’s lungs were flooded with wine then he is talking about vomit in his lungs. Jimi couldn’t vomit when his entire body is full of gallons of wine. Buster like a moron was arguing against his own wine hoax with vomit. That’s what happens when you’re a serial troll trying to change your stories.
It would be physically impossible for Jimi to be vomiting with wine filling his entire body like Buster first claimed. The vomiting came from drugs as confirmed by the ambulance men, the hospital, the autopsy, and the coroner. Buster’s hoax was destroyed by himself and his own fake made up stories.
Immediately after Jimi died the tabloid press stated that Jimi died as a result of taking illicit drugs. After the coroner’s report all that disappeared with Jimi’s death reported as a barbiturate overdose. Some of the more respected newspapers wrote some very flattering things about Jimi’s contribution to the development of music and that he was a gentle peaceful man who was concerned with making music.
Buster knows his hoax is over so all he can do is ridiculously say 0.7 is not lethal over and over. Unfortunately for Buster, he is easily proven to be a fraud cuz there is a thing called a toxicity chart that details the toxic/lethal numbers for levels in blood. Since 0.7 is universally known as lethal, no doctor in the world would ever say it’s not. Buster isn’t too smart to figure that one out and his hoax has reached it’s end. In this comment, I’m going to debunk all of Buster’s phony barbiturate talking points where he claims 0.7 is not fatal, Jimi couldn’t vomit on 9 pills, and the made up ridiculous “famous tolerance” claim. It all ends for Buster the clown as he is refuted for good with real documented medical science.
BUSTER says: Jason also knows one of the autopsy doctors commented that .7mg was not a fatal amount…Jason has been referenced Glebbeek’s Vesparax overdose case histories where persons who took 1 to 6 more Vesparax than Jimi never vomited…The most they had was a strange red foam in the mouth but no massive vomiting…Jason knows he is lying which is why he ignores those directly, scientifically-analogous other cases…Jason also contemptuously ignores that no matter how many times he trolls a fantastic amount of pills that Jimi came up 200mg short in the barbiturate amount by which overdoses are scientifically measured…The reason Jason ignores this critical science and Jimi’s famous tolerance is because he knows it defeats his bullshit so he has to stay away from it like a vampire stays away from light…Trolls post things like “18 times the amount” and “35 barbiturates”, but they never venture near the real science that exposes the lie in that exaggeration…~.7mg is what real science goes by and it isn’t enough to kill someone – especially Jimi with his well-known tolerance…Jason knows this, which is why he lied and trolled like an obnoxious delinquent by saying .7mg was “lethal”…It also wouldn’t make someone vomit profusely…
JASON says: Buster is a clown which is why I gave him that name. He claims to be this brilliant “medical expert” but doesn’t know a damn thing making up total medical nonsense. Buster is a pathological liar cuz there was only ONE autopsy doctor and that was Dr. Teare. I called him out on this lie before many months ago, but he repeats the same lie again. He is deranged. Dr. Teare would NEVER say that 0.7 is NOT a lethal amount cuz medical science says IT IS. 0.7 is a number in the toxicity chart that it is medically classified as lethal. Every doctor in the world knows this. Teare entered a 0.7 lethal number on Jimi’s autopsy.
Buster is referencing bullshit cuz 15 Vesperax would equal to 60 barbiturates. Nobody in the world would survive taking 15 Vesparax or 60 barbiturates. Jimi died taking 9. He lies with pill quantities to dismiss Jimi’s overdose. Jimi did not “come up 200mg short” since overdose very in milligrams. This is another lie by this fraud. Buster’s “Jimi famous tolerance” claim is a farce only made up by Buster so he can claim Jimi didn’t OD on barbiturates.
Real science says 0.7 is lethal, you idiot. That’s why I’ve been laughing at you this whole time as you were ranting like a lunatic making up fake science and phony conspiracy theories. Jimi died from a 0.7 lethal drug overdose and there is nothing you can do to lie with your bogus hoax to change it.
I want everybody reading to Google: Winek’s Drug & Chemical Blood-Level Data 2001.
This is in pdf and details the toxicity blood level for drugs and barbiturate. Vesparax was a 3 combination drug of secobarbital, brallobarbital, hydroxyzine. The main drug was the secobarbital and this medication was used as a antipsychotic and a sleep aid combined which gave the person a hangover effect the next day. Now if you Google this toxicity chart you will see the results. Scroll all the way down to Secobarbital and Hydroxyzine.
Secobarbital 0.5 = Lethal
So, 0.5 is lethal and Jimi registered 0.7 well above it, which is not even including the other two drugs. That’s why Vesperax was so powerful and Buster the clown is hilariously having Jimi take 15 Vesparax and up to 4000mgs of it. The normal dose was 1 cuz it was a 3 combination drug and not like other barbiturates.
Hydroxyzine 0.4 = Lethal
So, 0.4 is lethal and Jimi registered 0.7 well above it.
Now if you understand what type of medication Secobarbital is it’s a short acting barbiturate meaning it packs more punch in a short amount of time to knock you out to work faster in your system. Now look up short acting barbiturates.
Short Acting barbiturates = 0.5 toxic
So, 0.5 is toxic and Jimi was 0.7 which is lethal
The brallobarbital is the long acting medication in the barbiturate to make the person sleep giving a hang over feeling the next day.
brallobarbital 0.5 = Lethal
So, Jimi took 9 of these pills reaching lethal levels with all 3 medications and if you look at short acting barbiturates which secobarbital is you will see 0.5 is toxic. Jimi had 0.7 registered in his system which is lethal. This is what Dr. Teare found in Jimi’s autopsy and what Dr. Rufus Crompton told Kathy Etchingham when he read the toxic reading. So, Buster’s absurd lie that a doctor would say “0.7 is not lethal” is complete crap. This proves beyond a doubt Jimi died from a lethal drug overdose. You can’t get that number from a phony wine drowning where no wine was found. So, this bogus “Jimi’s famous tolerance claim” or “0.7 is not lethal” or “Jimi can’t die from 9 pills” is complete crap. Buster has been exposed as a fraud once again and should hang his head in shame for how he lied and behaved on this site.
I’m not done yet exposing Buster the fraud. He says “I’m a troll and a liar” and “18 times the amount isn’t toxic”. Well, Buster aka Albert or Brian Doyle read what read medical science says.
From: Isbell, H.: Acute and chronic barbiturate intoxication. (1982)
A dose of 1 gram of barbiturates can cause toxic poisoning.
Assume severe poisoning if 10 times the dose has been ingested.
Toxicity is likely when the dose exceeds 5–10 times the hypnotic dose
Assume severe barbiturate poisoning if 10x the hypnotic dose has been ingested.
Death is most commonly due to respiratory arrest and cardiovascular collapse.
From: Case, CG. Barbiturate toxicity
Barbiturates can be extremely dangerous because even a slight overdose can cause coma or death.
Difficulty in breathing, vomiting, increasing heart rate and blood pressure.
JASON says: Well well well, what do we have here? Medical science says 1 gram of barbiturates can cause toxic poisoning. Jimi Hendrix had 1.8 grams registered in the autopsy.
Medical science says that SEVERE barbiturate poisoning will occur at 10 TIMES the dose. Jimi took 18 times the dose which is 8 MORE TIMES THE SEVERE AMOUNT OF 10. And this idiot moron Buster the clown says Jimi could ingest 8 more Vesparax up to 4000mg. This guy is a nut case and has no clue what he is talking about. Buster is a massive fraud.
Also, barbiturate poisoning causes respiratory arrest as it was stated above. That is exactly what happened to Jimi Hendrix from his overdose. He had difficulty breathing and respiratory arrest suffocating on the vomit. A fake “wine drowning” would not cause that as liquid wine would be killing him instead. The cardiovascular collapse from the drugs increased Jimi’s heart rate building up fluid that went into his chest. This is all effects from the drug overdose and what Dr. Teare found. This can’t happen with a phony “wine drowning” cuz it is a complete opposite death.
Remember Buster was saying nobody can die under 9 Vesparax pills?
The best classification of barbiturates which relates to their degree of toxicity is being their speed of action:
Long -acting barbiturates – Brallobarbital
Short – acting barbiturates – Secobarbital
Much lower blood levels will be found in the short – acting group as death may occur more quickly from the usual mode of action, a central depression of the respiratory centres. Case studies show a 1978 death occuring within 20 minutes of taking a 5 tablet overdose of Secobarbital/brallobarbital/hydroxyzine known as the brand name sold as Vesparax.
Sources: Patel, R. Fatal intoxication of barbiturates
Sources: Case, CG. Barbiturate toxicity
Sources: Green, M. Postmortem and clinical toxicology
JASON says: Read it and weep Buster the clown. Jimi had both short and long acting barbs in Vesparax. The 1978 case study had a 5 tablet overdose death occurring within 20 minutes. Jimi took 9 of those. I’m still not done yet debunking you, you fraud.
These are Jimi’s autopsy numbers from Dr. Teare
Dosage: 1.8 grams of barbiturates (consistent with 9 tablets of Vesparax, 18 times reg. dosage), 20 mg of amphetamines, and 20 mg of cannabis, as well as 100 mg to 100 ml of alcohol (consistent with 4 pints)
Above it reads 1 gram can cause toxic poisoning. Jimi had 1.8 grams in his system which is lethal. 18 times the normal amount of Vesperax found when 10 times is a lethal amount. Also notice the alcohol. 4 pints. That is not a “trace”. Jimi was over the legal alcohol limit. Alcohol intensifies barbiturates making the pills MORE LETHAL.
Once you bring real medical science into the picture, Buster is destroyed cuz these real numbers are medical proof of an lethal drug overdose. Buster tries to trick people with his flowery prose and fictitious medical jargon pretending he knows what he’s talking about. He’s nothing but a serial troll who constantly contradicts himself changing fake story to fake story just so he can say “Jimi Hendrix was murdered”. You have to be mentally off to keep this up for over a decade on various websites making up complete nonsense and attacking other people when he’s proven to be a serial troll.
This is ironclad medical of a Jimi Hendrix drug overdose and not a fake and phony wine drowning where there is never any proof except bogus claims and outrageous tales.
Vesparax is a strong brand of German sleeping pill which induces 8 hours of sleep in someone weighing 70kg or 160 pounds The recommended dosage is half a tablet Jimi took 9 of these so he didn’t stand a chance. Jimi would have been dead in a very short amount of time.
Even Dr. Rufus Crompton said he thought just 5 pills could get this lethal reading.
Hi Jason, Dr. Teare performed autopsies on other high profile people so he would have been very familiar with their habits and lifestyle. When he opened Jimi up he probably thought he we go again another barbiturate overdose.
Rock stars who died at age 27: Jimi Hendrix, Brian Jones, Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, Alan Wilson, Kurt Cobain and Amy Winehouse.
I have a concert CD from August 2, 1970 from Honolulu, HI but there is no record of Jimi playing on that date, only August 1. I’ve heard the August 1 show but my copy sounds like a different show. weird.
On 2 September 1970, three songs into his performance in Aarhus, Denmark, Jimi had to leave the stage suffering from too heavy an overdose of sleeping pills.
Hendrix reportedly took 5 Mandrax pills with whisky before the show began. Erratic playing and loss of coordination, Hendrix struggled to get through 3 numbers incoherently mumbling words.
As it was clear Hendrix could not continue, management helped him off the stage.
Jimi then announced, “I been dead a long time” as a farwell to the crowd when he left the stage. Hendrix collapsed to the ground off stage from the overdose.
Hendrix came back in fine form on the 3rd giving a magnificent performance in Copenhagen. His final 2 shows followed in Berlin and Fehmarn Germany 4 & 6 September.
Just 2 weeks later, Hendrix was found dead of an accidental sleeping pill overdose in London.
4 October 1970 Muzik Pop
Hi Jason, It seems Jimi was no stranger to popping large amounts of pills without thinking. I wonder about the mental state of someone who does this, and the lack of support or awareness of the people around him.
Hi Ivana,
Several people who knew Jimi said in the Summer of 1970 he was taking more pills than he should have and it was messing him up to perform. He took 5 Mandrax at the concert, and if Monika told him the pills were ‘weak’ like she first stated she told him, then he probably took a few extra to get to sleep and unfortunately that’s what caused his OD and ended his life.
Just wanted to provide another example showing how Buster is just a hoaxer who makes up lies for his bogus murder hoax. In 2012 on another site, that Buster is now banned from, he was posting with his infamous alias “Scrum Drum”. He claimed he spoke with Fraud Bannister and said there “was only clear wine in Jimi’s lungs and no vomit”. He clearly said that. After I called Buster out on his lie that Jimi had vomit in his lungs and his fake wine claim is impossible, Buster started attacking me and started with his new bogus vomit in the lungs theory. Like I said, whenever his fake stories are debunked, he comes up with a new one. That’s why this fake Hendrix “murder myth” is a joke and Buster’s phony stories are all made up. He never “spoke with Bannister” either. Here is it in black and white.
Scrum Drum: I’ve been involved with research over this in the last two years and spoke to Dr Bannister in person two weeks ago. There’s absolutely no doubt Jimi Hendrix was murdered. Dr Bannister described to me how he took at least 20 minutes to remove “bottles worth” of red wine from Jimi’s lung’s in hospital. He is adamant that Jimi was drowned in clear red wine not containing any vomit that he removed before their failed attempt to resuscitate him. I suggest you ignore people who ridicule this because they obviously haven’t done any serious research.
BUSTER: This has to be the case because for Jason’s scenario to be true there would still have to be vomit in the untreated lung that pushed the other vomit in to the small bronchi…Jason is saying there was no wine and no treatment…For that to be the case then there would still be vomit in the main lung that pushed the other vomit in to the small bronchi…The fact Teare discovered no vomit in the main lung and vomit only in the small bronchi is forensic proof that the vomit in the main lung was mixed in with a large amount of wine and was suctioned out with that wine.
BUSTER: Jason has failed to answer the FACT that the only way there could be vomit in the small bronchi and none in the rest of the lung is if the vomit was suctioned-out with that wine…When Jason refused to answer that he lost the debate.
JASON: I didn’t answer Buster’s bogus vomit claim for one reason. It’s another fake story. In 2012, he was posting there was only “clear wine in Jimi’s lungs and no vomit”. After he was debunked by me here, he changed his story to argue vomit was in Jimi’s lungs. That’s why I told him he is so dumb arguing against his own bogus wine claim. Then he went berserk knowing how he ruined his own hoax. Real life events never change and Buster changes his fake stories whenever he wants cuz it’s all a hoax.
There was some criticism about the delay in calling the ambulance contributing to Jimi’s death as Monika called around for advice instead of calling the ambulance as soon as she saw Jimi was in trouble. I doubt whether this would made any difference to the outcome as just the potency of the Vesparax would have killed him very quickly.
Hi Ivana,
I follow the expertise of Dr. Rufus Crompton:
“He would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it.”
Just finished reading an article in the Daily Mail about a new biography written by Philip Norman, ‘The Short Spellbinding Life of Jimi Hendrix.’ It basically tells what we already know but want I found interesting is what Dr. Crompton told Kathy Etchingham that Jimi would have died even if he hadn’t vomited.
The pills were lethal to his system.
Hi Jason, I’ve heard the brain is the last thing to shut down, there’s some sort of awareness. Spooky!
Michael Jeffrey died in a plane crash in 1973 over France. There was even talk that the government was involved in some way because Jeffrey knew too much. How crazy would you need to be to invent and believe such a story. 😏
Hi Ivana,
Guess who this is? LOL
http://www.prayer-man.com/goodbye-brian-doyle/
Hi Jason, This is just too priceless. I got a real kick out of reading it. Thanks to Prayer Man he nailed it with his comments. Now I know what Buster looks like-a real looney.
Hi Jason, Showed this to a neighbour now he understands fully why Buster said the things he did. LOL 😆
LOL. Buster looks like a kook. Like an old troll under a bridge. He had a creepy look at the end of the video.
Days after Jimi died, Eric Burdon appeared on a program saying that he thought Jimi’s poem Story of Life was a suicide note. He later regretted this and stated that he wasn’t in a good headspace at the time. This could be where Sharon Lawrence got her idea about Jimi committing suicide to coincide with his fascination with the number 9. Just sounds like more conspiracy theory. Alex Constantine is another writer who is good at fuelling conspiracy hoaxes. He claims the FBI had files on some rockstars, including Jimi, because of their popularity with young people in order to stop protest movements. But none of this means that Jimi was targeted for assassination by any government group. What really killed Jimi was his encounter with 9 Vesparax pills belonging to Monika in a Notting Hill Hotel.
Sharon Lawrence wasn’t as close to Hendrix as she claimed, otherwise she wouldn’t have made up a bunch of phony stories and quotes in her book as well as claiming Jimi committed suicide.
Burdon first thought it was a suicide note when he first read it, but then realized he made a mistake.
That’s where Buster got his bogus conspiracies from and then he had every intelligence agency and organized group taking part in a “Hendrix murder”. He even had Monika who was 23 years old and German being a “top secret British MI6 spy” drowning Hendrix with Jeffery. Just ridiculous stuff. All those Jeffery intelligence claims were bogus cuz nobody has any proof except outrageous stories. Jeffery was a club owner who happened to find Alan Price and his band by accident and made them the house band at his club and offered to manage them to get them a contract. Chas Chandler recruited Jeffery to help manage Jimi cuz he needed the financial help. So, this business Jeffery was a spy to infiltrate rock bands is a phony tale.
Buster also claimed Jeffery was murdered by Intel with two colliding planes “to get the job done”. He posted this nonsense as jetblast over at straight dope forum.
The fact is Jimi took an overdose of pills he knew nothing about.
Hi Jason, All hoaxes in the end designed to hoodwink people.
Monika’s outburst at Harvey’s place when Jimi showed interest in another girl Monika must have felt that she had a relationship with Jimi on some level. But then again the pictures of her smiling in Tony Brown’s book shortly after Jimi died reveals the true extent of her relationship with Jimi. Sharon Lawrence also commented on the fact that Monika was more interested in talking about her paintings than what happened to Jimi. It was a case of goodbye Jimi hello Monika.
Monika wanted to create the album covers and add her photographs of Jimi inside the gatefold on his posthumous albums. Jeffery declined and I believe she held resentment towards him for that. She later came up with the story that they were going to get married and she was going to design all the artwork but nobody said her claim was accurate.
Hi Jason, What you’ve said sounds so much better than that rubbish that one of the Aleem twins wrote about overhearing a conversation while napping on a couch at Electric Lady Studios between Monika and Michael admitting to murdering Jimi. LOL.
LOL. Can’t forget about Aleem and his famous nap waking up just in time to hear Monika and Jeffery plotting “evil deeds”. What a fake story.
Monika talked about that in the 70’s in a German fan mag and is on video in the 90’s saying she was going to do the album covers.
Terry Slater observed that Jimi wasn’t in a particularly good mood back at The Samarkand Hotel and Angie Burdon also noticed that Jimi appeared jumpy at Kameron’s party. When Monika came to pick him up he tried to get Devon Wilson to go with him presumably because he didn’t want to be left alone with Monika following her earlier tantrum at Harvey’s place. The guests at the party were all trying to get Monika to go away and leave Jimi alone but he made the fatal mistake of going back to her hotel room despite her earlier outburst, and then trusting her enough to take her prescription medication.
Woodstock 15-18 August, 1969. 51 years ago on Monday 18th August, Jimi played his legendary Star Spangled Banner. ✌️
Jimi’s last concert was Fehmarn on September 6, 1970.
50 years ago Jimi was living the last month of his life.
I wonder what would’ve made Jimi say that he didn’t think he would live to 28 years of age. Stella Douglas also noted that towards the end Jimi was disinterested in his body and life in general. Then again others commented that he was looking forward to the future, making plans and getting back to his studio and more recording.
Watched an episode of the Dick Cavett Show where he asked Jimi if he was married or intended to do so with Jimi answering no to both questions. This puts an end to the nonsense that Monika was engaged to Jimi in early 1969 and that he intended to marry her since this interview took place after Woodstock in August 1969.
Another fantasy invented by Monika. Everybody who knew Jimi said Monika’s marriage story was b.s. but there’s the proof right from Jimi himself.
Others have said the same. I guess if they are living in the fast lane they don’t expect to live long. Yeah, that’s what I don’t get, too many conflicting stories on his outlook at the time. Then people hear a story and make up a conspiracy. Levine said Jimi was happy.
Hi Jason, If only Jimi had taken that year off he talked about to study music properly or just to relax. I read that Jimi had to keep touring to pay off some debts that he had because of his new studio Electric Lady. If you look at some of the photos taken of The Experience later on they all look pretty run down.
Hi Ivana,
Yeah I agree, Jimi was terribly overworked and his pill consumption was increasing heavily. If he took time out from touring and stayed away from Dannemann he wouldn’t have died. Jimi look really tired in those photos.
To coincide with the 50th anniversary of Jimi’s death a “documentary” about to be released in the United States alleges Jimi was murdered by waterboarding with wine by Michael Jeffrey and Monika Dannemann. Dumb accusations like this one aren’t helped by Jimi’s brother, Leon Hendrix, who believes his brother was murdered. Funny how the renowned pathologist, Dr. Teare, failed to see any wine on Jimi’s body and only mentioned the blood and urine readings of alcohol. Kathy Etchingham believes that Jimi never intended to spend the night with Monika and only returned to the Samarkand Hotel to pick up his guitar.
Debunked nonsense from Tappy “The Fraud” Wright’s fake book.
New Jimi Hendrix doc will explore the star’s ‘Rainbow Bridge’ film and 1970 Hawaii show
‘Music, Money, Madness… Jimi Hendrix In Maui’ will be released in November
A new documentary about Jimi Hendrix will delve into the making of the star’s Rainbow Bridge film and his 1970 show in Hawaii.
The late rock icon performed at the foot of the Haleakala volcano in Maui, with footage of the gig featured in the film.
Music, Money, Madness… Jimi Hendrix In Maui will tell the story of the semi-fictional movie and performance. The project was thought up by Hendrix’s manager Michael Jeffrey, who was inspired by the film Easy Rider.
The film, which was directed by Chuck Wein, focused on the travels of a model from New York to Hawaii and was panned by most critics. Clips from Hendrix’s show at Haleakala appeared in the film, but most of the footage from the day has never been released before.
The documentary, which will be released on November 20, will include interviews from people involved with Rainbow Bridge and present at the Maui show, as well as previously unseen archival footage.
Last month (August 9), the Japanese sunburst electric guitar Hendrix used in the ‘60s sold at auction for more than £160,000. The late star used the instrument after he was discharged from the army in 1962 and played it during his time in New York as a musician for the likes of the Isley Brothers.
Meanwhile, last year, an urban legend that claimed Hendrix was responsible for the arrival of wild parakeets in Britain was debunked. The myth stated that the rock icon had released the first pair of parakeets, called Adam and Eve, as a symbol of peace while stoned in London’s Carnaby Street in 1968.
https://www.nme.com/news/music/new-jimi-hendrix-doc-explore-rainbow-bridge-film-1970-hawaii-show-2751186
Hi Jason, I bought the Rainbow Bridge video decades ago on VHS. It’s such a kooky movie with the saving grace being Jimi’s performance and the scenery. The model mentioned is Jimi’s friend Pat Hartley. That story about the parakeets is really funny.
The most ridiculous bit in this movie is the woman who knows people from the planet Venus. I wonder what NASA would have made of that. 😂
Been looking at Kathy Etchingham’s Facebook page. There is a new film/documentary called Starting At Zero to coincide with the 50th anniversary of Jimi’s death.
Terrific article written by Mark Bannerman abc.net.au about Jimi and his death.
Is the documentary out now?
Hi Jason, It’s on at the Regent Theatre near Boston at 6.30pm on the 18th September. You can book through http://www.jimihendrixreturns.earth or visit Kathy’s Facebook page.
Thanks Ivana. I want to see it.
On Facebook, this conspiracy theory nut was saying “50 years ago tonight Michael Jeffery put his plan in motion”. Funny thing is he couldn’t answer his bogus claim since Jeffery was in Spain.
It’s sad to think this was the last couple of hours for Jimi. He wouldn’t have died if he didn’t go back with Monika.
Hi Jason, I’m not surprised to see the number of articles relating to Jimi’s death. Kathy described these murder claims as tin foil hatter stuff. Would you believe Dr. Red Wine Bannister still insists Jimi was covered in red wine, and he remembers Monika being at the hospital and as being a slim girl. This guy just can’t wait to get his name in the newspapers. If Monika had been at the hospital as Jimi’s fiancée then Dr. Seifert wouldn’t have needed to wait for Gerry Stickells to identify Jimi’s body. If only Jimi had ignored Monika when she came to pick him up at Kameron’s party or he had insisted on being driven to the Cumberland Hotel instead of her room at the Samarkand Hotel like you said.
Fraud Bannister loves the publicity and will always claim imaginary wine he has no record of. There would be no reason for him to wait for Stickells if Monika was present at the Emergency room.
Yeah it was just a couple of crackpots who claimed Jeffery killed Jimi. Neither one had an answer when I proved to them Jeffery was in Spain. They had nothing to say.
Jimi Hendrix FINAL guitar performance 48 hours before death: ‘He was flying’ – LISTEN here
JIMI HENDRIX performed his final show just two days before he died 50 years ago this week. Listen to his last guitar performance here.
https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/music/1336500/Jimi-Hendrix-final-show-Jimi-Hendrix-last-guitar-concert-Jimi-Hendrix-death
Hi Ivana,
This must be the stupid documentary you were talking about. Glad it’s getting poor reviews.
Hendrix and the Spook review – a poor way to honour Jimi
* Star
This documentary about the acclaimed guitarist is a cheaply made mix of interviews and dumbshow dramatic recreations
As we approach 18 September, the 50th anniversary of the death of Jimi Hendrix, when he was just 27 years old, fans of the acclaimed guitarist may want to play some of his music, pour one out and toast his memory, and generally muse on his massive contribution to rock and guitar history. If that’s not enough, there are tons of books about him and miles of archive footage of the star playing his hits, and even a biopic (Jimi: All Is By My Side) that received a mixed reception in which André 3000 dons the feathered fedora and the flares to play the man himself. But watching this tawdry documentary, a cheaply made mix of interviews and dumbshow dramatic recreations by actors scuttling about flimsy sets in gloomy lighting, would be an unpleasant and depressing way to mark the occasion.
Although a cursory rundown of Hendrix’s early life and career is provided in the first third or so, the bulk of the film focuses on the last days of his life in 1970, when he was passing through London after a tour of Germany and Scandinavia. Wrung out and exhausted, he did a gig at Ronnie Scott’s in Soho, where witnesses described him as out of it and tired-looking. Spending time with Monika Dannemann, a German woman who described herself as his secret fiancee, but whom others interviewed here describe as a “stalker”, he spent the last day of his life alternately partying and arguing with Monika, and ended up dying in his hotel, choking on his own vomit, with a large quantity of barbiturates in his system.
The stentorian voice of the narrator speculates as to whether Hendrix was murdered, either by a hitman ordered by his manager Mike Jeffrey, who the narrator claims could have been skimming off Hendrix’s earnings excessively, or by Dannemann who, he asserts, was jealous of Hendrix’s dalliances with other women. In the end, the verdict of the programme is as inconclusive and open as the coroner’s verdict at the time, and nothing has been proved except that there’s always a market for conspiratorial crime documentaries, especially if the victim is famous. Poor Jimi deserves better than this.
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/sep/16/hendrix-and-the-spook-review-jimi-hendrix-guitarist-documentary
Hi Jason, What a tacky video. There is Leon Hendrix who to me always looks dubious. I think he’s just looking for his fifteen minutes of fame. I can’t stand this sensationalist tabloid rubbish. This stuff belongs in the tin foil hatter camp or in the bargain basement bin like Tappy Wright’s book.
Leon had a falling out with the Estate so he’s looking for publicity. Just more conspiracies and fake dramatization of events that never happened. Nothing factual is ever shown and it’s all based on the lies of Tappy “The Fraud” Wright and he was exposed by Bob Levine.
Are you watching the documentary tonight?
50 years ago at this moment Jimi Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbotts Hospital. Sadly, we have hoaxers that attempt to alter history with bogus conspiracy theories making a mockery of Jimi’s tragic death. It’s nice to see Jimi being honored on Facebook and on Twitter so far today.
1970-2020 50 years.
Well said Jason. I’m looking forward to seeing Starting At Zero. R.I.P Jimi.
Nice article about Jimi http://www.usatoday.com. I would have loved to have heard Jimi’s tribute to Martin Luther King apparently it was such a moving piece of music that he had the entire audience in tears, and after he had finished playing Jimi put his guitar down and walked quietly off stage. Brilliant!
Jimi Hendrix Dies
September 18, 1970
LONDON (UPI) — Jimi Hendrix, whom many critics considered the world’s finest electric guitarist, was taken today to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival, due to an overdose of drugs a hospital spokesman said. He was 27.
The sad truth unfortunately. I would have liked for Monika to have been questioned more about how her pills got into his system in the first place since Jimi was not staying permanently at her place. I suppose they all went by what she told the authorities, and Dr Thurston presented the findings of Dr. Teare’s autopsy report.
Pop Star Jimi Hendrix Dies
September 18, 1970
London (AP) Jimi Hendrix, the American Pop singer died today in London.
Hendrix, 27, was reported dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital in the Kensington area of London this morning.
Police sources say that Hendrix died of an apparent drug overdose and that no foul play was involved.
British blues singer and close friend of Hendrix, Eric Burdon said “All I know is that he had taken some sleeping tablets.”
A coroner’s officer took possession of the sleeping tablets where Hendrix was staying with a girlfriend instead of the Cumberland Hotel where he was registered.
Doctors at St. Mary Abbots Hospital stated that an overdose of drugs was the apparent cause of death.
A hospital spokesman issued the following official statement regarding the death of Hendrix. “We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”
His body was taken from the hospital to a southwest London morgue for an autopsy after he was pronounced dead. The official cause of death will not be determined until a post mortem.
Hendrix was arrested last year in Toronto, Canada for posession of hashish and heroin, but was acquitted. During the trial he said he used marijuana, hashish, LSD and cocaine but never heroin. His most popular song, Purple Haze, was descriptive of drug culture.
The tabloids had a field day claiming that Jimi was addicted to all manner of drugs and he died because of these but after the inquest all of this nonsense was replaced with the actual and real cause of Jimi’s death which was a barbiturate overdose like we both know.
Drug Overdose Kills Rock Idol Hendrix
September 19, 1970
London (Reuters) – American rock star Jimi Hendrix died yesterday of an overdose of drugs, a spokesman for St. Mary’s Abbots Hospital announced.
Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.
“He was a good friend of mine and I will miss him.” singer Janis Joplin said when she told of guitarist Jimi Hendrix’s death in London Friday. And she cried.
Rock musicians across the country mourned the loss of a rare talent and brilliant guitarist.
“He was a innovator.” said Miss Joplin from a California recording studio. “He made everybody in the music business aware that the public was ready for and really wanted free musical expression. He showed that it really wasn’t delusion. It was reality.”
British musician John Mayall called Hendrix’ contribution “monumental”.
“The cat was definitely the main man”, said drummer Buddy Miles, formerly with Hendrix’ Band of Gypsies and now leader of The Buddy Miles Band.
Hendrix, 27, was found dead of an apparent drug overdose in a London apartment rented by 23-year-old Monika Dannemann, a beautiful German blonde.
Hendrix reportedly took several pills while suffocating on his own vomit according to hospital sources. A coroner’s officer took several blankets and some pills for analysis.
Police sources say the cause of death appears to be drug related. A post mortem examination was scheduled today, followed by a coroner’s inquest, probably Monday.
Eric Burdon, former lead singer with a group called The Animals and friend of Hendrix said: “All I know is that he had taken some sleeping pills.”
Burdon added that Miss Dannemann had found Hendrix in a coma and called an ambulance. She was taken to the hospital and put under sedation.
Hendrix made his last public appearance at a London jazz club Wednesday night. “We had been trying to contact him for three days but could not,” said one of the singer’s British agents. “It was very unlike him. He was usually very reliable.”
Hendrix, who featured wild music, swiveling hips and an unruly Afro hairstyle, once said he used drugs but outgrown them.
A year ago he told an interviewer, ” I tell you when I die I’m not going to have a funeral. I’m going to have a jam session. And, knowing me, I’ll probably get busted at my own funeral.”
Some nice tributes to Jimi. The Times also wrote a really good one. To think that Janis Joplin died two weeks later she was also a trailblazer.
Janis Joplin died just a couple of weeks later. Kind of eerie she was interviewed.
Here’s the most important facts from the articles that debunk the phony wine/murder/procedures hoax.
“Jimi Hendrix died yesterday of an overdose of drugs, a spokesman for St. Mary’s Abbots Hospital announced.”
“Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.”
“Police sources say that Hendrix died of an apparent drug overdose and that no foul play was involved.”
“Doctors at St. Mary Abbots Hospital stated that an overdose of drugs was the apparent cause of death.”
“A hospital spokesman issued the following official statement regarding the death of Hendrix. “We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.”
“Hendrix reportedly took several pills while suffocating on his own vomit according to hospital sources. A coroner’s officer took several blankets and some pills
for analysis.”
“Police sources say the cause of death appears to be drug related. A post mortem examination was scheduled today, followed by a coroner’s inquest, probably Monday.”
JASON says: The hospital spokesman announced Hendrix died from drugs. Nothing about Jimi being “soaked or drowned” in wine or any phony procedures performed on him. All those fake claims came in 1992 and after. If it happened, the hospital spokesman would have said so on that day. This nonsense never happened on 9/18/70.
The doctors said Jimi was pronounced dead on arrival. Not one word about fake life saving procedures. Fraud Bannister was the attending doctor on 9/18/70. He told the press on that day Jimi was dead on arrival. He made up fake claims 20 years in January 1992. That’s why he has no evidence cuz it never happened.
The police said it was a drug overdose and there was no foul play. That debunks the decades later fake murder by wine claims. The police said nothing about wine and it would be obvious if wine was all over the place.
The doctors stated on 9/18/70 that it was a drug overdose. Fraud Bannister was the doctor who stated it. 20 years later he made up his fake wine claim. Real events can’t change and he never said anything about wine in 1970. Again, it never happened. We can clearly see Bannister made up a fake story.
The coroner’s officers took pills and blankets for analysis. No wine was found on the blankets. That debunks the bogus wine drowning that never happened.
All these fake claims and hoaxes are decades later after the fact claims. That’s why they can never produce any documents of wine or evidence cuz it never happened. The real evidence was documented on 9/18/70 and it was reported and documented which can never be changed.
Jimi’s real cause of death was prescription drug related as we both know. All that other stuff about the wine is just tin foil hatter nonsense. Fraud Bannister has an agenda and I think that is to draw attention to himself and to look like an honourable person. None of these experienced attendants would have missed all that wine as being in some way responsible for Jimi’s death. They all mentioned drugs as being the cause of death and not the wine. Seeing is believing.
Fraud Bannister thought he was going to be sued again in January 1992 after reading Electric Gypsy so he made up the fake wine claim. This was the same time he was being investigated for fraud and medical malpractice. He was struck off the medical register a couple of months later in April for 3 counts of fraud. He tried to portray himself as a hero pretending “to save Jimi’s life” but he forgot he contradicted himself when he admitted Jimi was dead on arrival and was dead already for several hours. Jimi could never be saved. That’s why Bannister is nothing but a fraud and nobody with common sense takes him seriously.
Jimi Hendrix Is Dead
19 September 1970
Jimi Hendrix, the American pop singer and guitarist, died in London yesterday. He had been taken by ambulance from a flat in a private hotel in Notting Hill but was dead on arrival at St Mary Abbot’s Hospital, Kensington.
The cause of death was most probably an overdose of drugs, said Scotland Yard, but a post mortem examination would be carried out today. The hospital said it did not know why Mr Hendrix had died but confirmed it to be an overdose.
Mr Hendrix, who was 27 years old, stayed in Britain after the Isle of Wight music festival, where he shared the top of the bill. He recently returned from a European tour which was cut short because of the illness of another member of the group.
He had been staying at the Cumberland Hotel in the West End and on Thursday asked to extend his stay to include that night, but a spokesman for the hotel said he was last seen there on Wednesday night, when he ordered a meal to be sent to his £17-a-day suite.
The flat where he was found dead was at the Hotel Samarkand and was booked in the name of Miss Monika Dannenman, a West German girl who spent most of yesterday afternoon in hospital. Last night she was back at the flat, but under sedation. Mr Danny Hall, the manager of the hotel, said he did not know Mr Hendrix and the first he had known of his death was when police called and took a number of blankets which they had told him were for analysis. At the flat a coroner’s officer took possession of some sleeping tablets.
Miss Dannenman made her six-week booking through an agent in West Germany, he said, and she had arrived there some time in August.
Mr Hendrix first appeared on the British pop scene in 1967 with a record called “Hey Joe.” Mr Les Perrin, his agent, said: “On stage he was a very warm man with a great sense of humour. He was a world-class talent. It’s a great loss for the pop business.”
With his group “Experience,” Mr Hendrix had a new single scheduled for release in about three weeks. Mitch Mitchell, his drummer, said he had been talking to Hendrix about the release of a new album and about another European tour.
Mr Hendrix was the grandson of a Cherokee Indian but part Negro as well. Apart from his flamboyant clothes he was distinguished by his long frizzy hair. In December last year he was acquitted at a Toronto court of possessing heroin and cannabis at the airport.
These articles all have a common thread that Jimi’s death was drugs related. The blanket would have been soaked, smelling of wine and red if Jimi had been waterboarded with wine. Just like the ambulance attendants said Jimi was dead when they arrived and it looked like a drugs overdose of which they saw many. Dr Crompton told Kathy that Jimi would have died even if he hadn’t vomited such was the damage the high dosage of Vesparax caused.
From Kathy Etchingham’s book “Through Gypsy Eyes”:
Donald Teare, the man who had actually done the autopsy on Jimi, was dead so we needed to talk to another expert. Dr Rufus Crompton, Director of Forensic Medicine at St George’s Medical School had worked with Professor Teare. We gave him a copy of the autopsy report and asked how, in his opinion Jimi had died.
‘He would have died from the amount of sleeping pills he had taken anyway,’ he told us. ‘The fact that he vomited and inhaled the vomit just hastened it. The reading in his liver was so high he couldn’t have survived it. He couldn’t have been breathing by the time he reached the hospital because his lungs were full of fluid, half a pint in one of them. What makes you think he took nine of these tablets?’
‘The girl who was with him said that’s what happened,’ we explained.
‘Well,’ the doctor looked doubtful, ‘I would say you wouldn’t need more than about five of those tablets to get this reading but I’ll ask a toxicologist what the dose could have been.’ Dee told me the toxicologist said that it was impossible to say. It could have been as few as four tablets or as many as nine.
JASON says: Crompton said no more than 5 Vesparax would have given the lethal reading in Jimi’s body. Even 4 tablets was toxic according to the toxicologist. Which is why people who took 4 tablets in the 70’s died. Crompton said nothing about imaginary wine. It’s all drug related and an accidental death.
Hi Jason, The toxicity of the Vesparax caused Jimi to vomit; they were just poison to his system. If Monika’s doctor told her to take no more than half a tablet then any amount above that would have threatened Jimi’s health. Monika said he took nine pills because she claimed one was on the floor the tablets coming in blister packets of ten or she actually saw him taking them. Whatever the actual amount this was an overdose no doubt.
Which proves 4 Vesparax are toxic.
Hi Jason, Tin foil hatters try to make it look as if Jimi’s death was caused by the wine but what they fail to point out is that the wine had nothing to do with Jimi’s death it was the Vesparax that killed Jimi. They push the imaginary wine scenario because it suits their agenda hoping that people will fall for what they’re saying. It’s all part of the hoax.
Yeah, the wine was invented by Fraud Bannister but Tappy Wright amplified it into his fake murder story that tin foil hatters use for their debunked hoax.
Dr Bannister reporting about Jimi’s death in an American magazine:”He was not breathing. We started pumping his chest to do cardiac massage and resuscitation. We tried to turn him over and he was very stiff and I think rigor mortis had already settled in.”. This sounds much more believable than the copious amounts of wine story the “good doctor” has been pushing for decades.
Jimi was dead for over 6 hours so he would be stiff. Bannister already destroyed his credibility when he confirmed Jimi was cold, dead, blue with black membranes then he pretended to be saving his life with “life saving procedures”. He can’t have it both ways.
This didn’t get any media coverage but on October 4, 2020 was the 50th Anniversary of Janis Joplin’s death.
R.I.P Janis.
I wonder why Monika decided to take her own life. I doubt it had anything to do with Kathy’s courtcase against her. She was married to Uli Jon Roth for many years but later claimed that her heart belonged to Jimi who Monika claimed she was engaged to. Her book dedicated to Jimi ‘The Inner World of Jimi Hendrix’ comes with the subtitle by Jimi’s fiancée.
Excerpts from “Hendrix, The Final Weeks”
Arriving for a show in Gothenburg, Sweden, Hendrix appeared in no condition to perform. That night’s show was a mess, a wasted Hendrix stumbled on stage forgetting songs mid-solo and drifting into others.
At the next gig in Denmark he had to be helped onstage by his new fiancée, Danish model and actress Kirsten Nefer, suffering from an overdose he lasted just three numbers. His final show, at the Open Air Love & Peace Festival on Fehmarn Island in Germany on 6 September, was anything but loving and peaceful – a storm had stopped Hendrix playing his scheduled slot the previous night and when he finally made it onstage he was booed and jeered. At the close of his set, the Hells Angels security, on a burning and looting rampage, stormed the stage to set fire to it, shooting a roadie in the leg.
……………………………….
But, in Nefer’s absence, his final three days were spent largely with Monika Dannemann, a 23-year-old German ex-ice skater with whom Hendrix had shared brief trysts in Dusseldorf and London the previous year. Dannemann would later claim that the pair had fallen deeply in love and plans for their marriage were under way.
“She seemed to be an obsessive fan who could actually harm the object of their adoration,” Norman argues. “Her claim that she was engaged to him and was the love of his life seemed very questionable.”
Hendrix had invited Dannemann to see him in London, where she booked into a bedsit-style room at the bohemian Samarkand Hotel in Notting Hill. She would describe Hendrix’s final days as wrapped up in idyllic romance, writing, painting and swearing undying love for each other at the Samarkand; his last creative work, a poem called “The Story of Life”, was composed there, featuring the fateful line, “The story of life is quicker than the wink of an eye”.
…………………………………….
Others paint a rockier picture. On 17 September, Hendrix’s last day alive, the pair were randomly spotted in traffic by Lloyds underwriter Philip Harvey – son of Tory MP Arthur Vere Harvey – and invited to his well-appointed apartment for drinks, where Dannemann berated Hendrix in the mews courtyard for half an hour when he began showing interest in Harvey’s two flirtatious female companions. After a late-night meal at the Samarkand, Dannemann then drove Hendrix to a party at music publisher Pete Kameron’s home at 1.45am. Dannemann wasn’t invited – another of Hendrix’s girlfriends, Devon Wilson, would be there – and when she came to collect him at 3am, Dannemann was berated from the window to “leave him alone”.
…………………………………………………
The following hours remain shrouded in mystery, with almost all of the eyewitness accounts changing over time until the truth of the matter slipped between the gaps. According to Dannemann, she and Hendrix returned to the Samarkand and stayed up talking – or, in other statements, arguing – until around 7.15am. He had taken a “brown bomber” amphetamine pill at Kameron’s party and, having often struggled to sleep over previous months, sometimes for days at a time, asked Dannemann if she had any sedatives he could take.
She offered him a strong German sleeping pill called Vesparax, each tablet a double dose for easing the injury which had stymied her skating career. It’s unknown how many of the tablets Hendrix took. According to a friend, folk singer Buzzy Linhart, the day before his death Hendrix had complained of being awake for days and a New York doctor had advised Hendrix to take three doses of his regular sleeping pill. Three or four double doses of the far stronger Vesparax would have been lethal. Dannemann believed he may have taken up to as many as nine of her tablets.
……………………………………………
Jimi Hendrix during what would be his last interview, with journalist Stephen Clackson, in August 1970.
The article appeared in the Sunday Mirror two days after Hendrix died (Rex)
Dannemann’s story of the timings and events of the following morning changed more than a dozen times over the coming years, and is riddled with inconsistencies. In some, she woke around 9am, in others 10.20am or closer to 11am. In her most generally accepted account, finding Hendrix “asleep”, she went out for cigarettes. On her return, she noticed vomit around his mouth and couldn’t wake him.
Hoping to find a number for his Harley Street doctor, she called her friend Alvenia Bridges who had spent the night at the Hotel Russell with Eric Burdon. Bridges would claim that Dannemann was hysterical, saying that Hendrix was unconscious and vomiting; she advised her to turn him over to stop him choking, but she failed to do so. Burdon’s story would also alter over time, but he’d variously claim that Dannemann had gone out for cigarettes after calling Bridges and had to be convinced, on a second call, to phone for an ambulance as she was worried about the drug paraphernalia littering the room and afraid that Hendrix would be angry to wake up feeling fine, handcuffed to a hospital bed.
……………………………………………………..
An ambulance was finally called at 11.18am, arriving at the Samarkand at 11.27am, over two hours after Dannemann’s earliest proclaimed rising. Details of the intervening period are confused at best. Burdon made his way to the scene, in some of his accounts arriving while Hendrix was still there, in others just as the ambulance was departing. “When I arrived there … I think I saw Jimi on the bed,” he told Hendrix’s long-term girlfriend and “Foxy Lady” inspiration Kathy Etchingham. “I didn’t want to, you know, look at it, you know, I didn’t want to look at the mess. We had to be there before. We got the guitars out, we got the drugs out of the place…”
……………………………………..
Terry “The Pill” Slater was filmed by police burying drugs in a communal garden (which were missing when he returned for them the next day), suggesting that this happened later in the day, after police had designated the Samarkand a potential crime scene.
…………………………………….
There were even discrepancies in reports from the medical teams who treated Hendrix. The ambulance crew reported that they found the apartment empty and Hendrix unresponsive, his throat entirely blocked with vomit: “We tried to revive him, but we couldn’t,” paramedic Reginald Jones told Etchingham. “The vomit was all dried. He’d been lying there for a long time. There was no heartbeat. He was blue, not breathing and not responding to light or pain.”
An unofficial 1993 investigation by former Sussex police superintendent Dennis Care, however, suggested that Hendrix may still have been alive, albeit barely, on his arrival at St Mary Abbot’s hospital – where he was rushed to a resuscitation room rather than sent directly to the morgue which was the official record– or had died in the ambulance that some reporters claimed.
…………………………………………………..
Dr John Bannister, the on-call registrar who had tended to Hendrix that day, believed him to have been dead for hours, but would later falsely claim Hendrix was covered in red wine still barely breathing. “The amount of wine that was over him was just extraordinary,” Bannister was quoted in The Times in 2009. “Not only was it saturated right through his hair and shirt, but his lungs and stomach were absolutely full of wine … We kept sucking him out and it kept surging and surging … He had really drowned in a massive amount of red wine.”
Bannister was the only medical professional at St. Mary Abbott’s hospital to make accusations of wine saturating Hendrix. However, Bannister had his medical license revoked due to fraudulent conduct and is deemed not credible with several new stories changing over the years. Bannister’s recent claims do not add up with Hendrix’s official autopsy data.
Hendrix’s autopsy reported 400ml of “free fluid” in his left lung, mentioning no wine in Hendrix’s lungs or stomach and little alcohol in his bloodstream; although Dr. Donald Teare concluded at the inquest Hendrix was over the legal alcohol limit, enough to fail a breathalyzer test.
……………………………………..
His death certificate listed cause of death as “inhalation of vomit [due to] barbiturate intoxication”. But such details, combined with the contradictory nature of almost every account surrounding Hendrix’s death, have allowed fanciful theories of murder and assassination plots to take root. Every conspiracy theory imaginable from the FBI’s Cointelpro (Counter-Intelligence Program) operation to Black Panthers, jealous lovers, a greedy business manager and underworld mafia types had their hand in killing Hendrix according to these conspirators.
In 1975, Dannemann claimed in an interview that Hendrix had been murdered by mobsters: “I do believe that he got poisoned, that he actually got murdered,” she told biographer Caesar Glebbeek. “There is something really behind the whole thing, and there’s quite a powerful group behind all that. I think it is the mafia.”
……………………………………………………….
Then, in 2009, The Animals’ one-time roadie James “Tappy” Wright released a memoir alleging that Jeffery, before his death in a plane crash in 1973, had drunkenly confessed to killing Hendrix by forcing a bottles of wine and sleeping pills down his throat. The manager, Wright attested, had been $45,000 in debt to the mafia and, fearing Hendrix was preparing to cut ties with him, was left with no option but to try to cash in on a $2m life insurance policy he’d just signed for Hendrix. According to Wright’s account, Jeffery admitted to hiring “some villains from up north” to help him drown Hendrix in the middle of night.
“Wright’s claim doesn’t hold water because Jeffery was on holiday at the time of Hendrix’s death. He was still going to be connected to Jeffery for some time after the actual management contract ended,” Norman argues. Indeed, Jeffery was set to continue to make significant money from Hendrix’s album advances and revenues well into the Seventies, and never received a penny from the insurance claim which, according to Hendrix’s US manager Bob Levine, was actually taken out by his record company Warner Brothers.
In 2011, Levine told musicradar.com that Wright had privately admitted to inventing the story to sell his book. “Jimi Hendrix was not murdered,” he said. “The whole thing is one giant lie … I told Tappy, ‘What are you doing making up this story? So you want to sell books – why do you have to print such lies?’ And he said to me, ‘Well, who’s going to challenge me? Everybody’s dead, everybody’s gone. Chas Chandler [Hendrix co-manager], Michael Jeffery, Mitch Mitchell [Jimi Hendrix Experience drummer], Noel Redding [Experience guitarist]… they’re all gone. Nobody can challenge what I write.’”
……………………………………
Sharon Lawrence, who wrote in her 2005 book Jimi Hendrix: The Man, the Magic, was convinced Hendrix’s death was a suicide. She also believed the account of the red wine came directly from Monika Dannemann pouring wine on an unconscious Hendrix as an attempt to revive him.
……………………………………….
Norman, on the other hand, believes it was a simple case of confusion and ill-judgement spiralling into tragedy. “I think it really was that more mundane [explanation] of accidentally taking too much, a potent lethal dose, and not being helped when he could have been helped,” he says. “I think it’s that he was befuddled and took double the dose that he thought he was taking. Much later another expert said that he was in such a poor state that even the single doses that he took might have finished him off because he was in such a low state of health … He was in a state of complete physical exhaustion at the time and London was full of people who supposedly cared about him and had some sort of responsibility for him and none of them seemed to be able to save him from this preventable, tragic death.”
………………………………………
With Dannemann’s suicide in 1996, the truth of Hendrix’s final hours likely followed her to the grave. Like the man himself, Hendrix’s passing remains an enigma, an impenetrable kernel of rock’n’roll folklore clouded by rumour, hearsay, lies and legends. But his essence – flamboyance, passion, style, confrontation, virtuosity – infuses and inspires the best music to this day. In that sense, he’s still out there, kissing skies.
Hi Jason, Terrific excerpt especially the second last paragraph says it all in a matter of fact, sensible and realistic way.
I think Dannemann came from a conservative background and didn’t want to be seen as just another groupie who was following Jimi whenever he was. She wanted to stand out from the other girls Jimi had brief affairs with and so concocted the engagement story. I also question Kirsten Nefer’s engagement to Jimi the photos of the pair together looked staged especially the ones where Jimi is having dinner at her house. Both these two women had very short relationships with Jimi and I doubt either of them were potential life long partners.
Hi Ivana,
It was very well written and also debunked the conspiracy nonsense that tin foil better peddle. It also established that Jimi had Nefer as a fiancee so he wouldn’t have Danneman 2 weeks later as a fiancee. The 9 pills were only an assumption by Dannemann
and it’s not known exactly how many Jimi actually took. The police did make the Samarkand a potential crime scene but found no foul play. Bannister is a fraud and the free fluid contained no wine. Wright was a scam artist and Jimi’s death was accidental. Confirms what we’ve been saying all along.
I don’t believe Jimi would have anybody as a fiancee during that period. Good point about Dannemann. Several people said she was an obsessed fan and was infatuated with Jimi so she made up the engagement to make herself look more important and like you said more to Jimi as just a groupie.
Devon Wilson was another girlfriend who followed Jimi to London. Despite their long relationship/friendship Jimi wasn’t glad to have her around according to reports. Jimi however tried to get her to go with him when Monika came to pick him up at Kameron’s party. I think Jimi became wary of Monika after her earlier outburst at Harvey’s place and perhaps wanted Devon as a backup or as an excuse not to linger at Monika’s place more than necessary.
Monika took her car to London when she went there in August 1970 hoping for a romantic rendezvous with Jimi. This I think suggests that she intended to stay for a while or follow Jimi wherever he was.
Monika booked the Samarkand in August of 1970 for a two week stay in September according to the news sources that reported on the day after Jimi’s death. Having her car there shows she would be for an extended time.
I’m sure Monika talked Jimi into staying with her at the Samarkand that night and then when he couldn’t sleep offered Jimi some of her Vesparax. The amount he took was so much that Jimi passed out shortly afterwards and couldn’t clear the vomit from his throat thereby chocking. It’s such a straightforward and sad scenario unfortunately but the truth like we’ve said. No-one else needed to be involved as the Vesparax did all the damage.
Yeah, that’s what happened since she was fighting with Jimi at Harvey’s and Kameron’s. Plus she admitted she gave Jimi the pills.
A new Hendrix conspiracy book is now trying to push the suicide angle regarding Jimi’s death.
“His friends and family attested to his noticeable unhappiness in the Summer of ’70. Hendrix was overwhelmed and frustrated and it seemed that his only escape from the pain was drugs and alcohol. This would eventually lead to his death on September 18, 1970 where he choked on his own vomit as a result of an overdose. Was it a case of Jimi checking out of this world by suicide?”
Hi Jason, Here we go again. I wonder if this biographer is a friend of Sharon Lawrence. If Jimi intended to commit suicide then he wouldn’t have booked his ticket back to New York. His death was accidental.
Hi Ivana,
Yeah this tabloid book is another copy of a Sharon Lawrence fiction book. The author goes on to claim Hendrix left what appears to be a “suicide note” and several friends publicly confirmed that Jimi killed himself. I guess it comes out next month and it portrays Jimi in a melancholy severely depressive state most of the time. Hope nobody buys this garbage.
Jimi Hendrix’s ex girlfriend Monika Dannemann found dead in her car of an apparent suicide
April 6, 1996
A GIRLFRIEND who pledged her life to the memory of Jimi Hendrix killed herself yesterday, only 48 hours after losing a costly High Court clash with another ex-lover of the rock guitarist.
Monika Dannemann was found dead in her fume-filled Mercedes at her thatched cottage in Seaford, East Sussex, which she had turned into a shrine to the star.
Hendrix was living with Miss Dannemann in London when he died in 1970, and in a recent interview she said: “Jimi gave me a heavy burden. I had to promise that if he died, I’d spread his message. It is a lonely life. But if I’d not met Jimi, my life would have been very ordinary.”
She had been involved in a long controversy over the circumstances of Hendrix’s death and his relationship with the other woman, Kathy Etchingham. On Wednesday, Miss Dannemann, 50, an artist, was held to be in contempt by breaching an injunction not to repeat allegations that Miss Etchingham, 49, was an “inveterate liar” about her life with Hendrix. She was liable for £30,000 costs.
Last night Miss Etchingham said at her home near Farnham, Hampshire: “I am greatly saddened that it should have to end like this. There was never any personal ill-will as far as I was concerned. But certain things happened over the last five years over which I had to take a legal stand. I feel very sorry for her family over this dreadful news.”
In the past Miss Etchingham, who inspired the Hendrix song “Foxy Lady”, had questioned whether Miss Dannemann could have done more to save Hendrix before he choked to death on his own vomit in September 1970, aged 27. Continued speculation about the circumstances of the death led Sir Nicholas Lyell, the Attorney-General, to reopen the file in 1994 and consider whether he died, as the official version said, in an ambulance
on his way to hospital, or had lain dead in Miss Dannemann’s Notting Hill flat for
hours before help was summoned. The investigation cleared her of suggestions that she delayed calling for help.
The two women cut contrasting figures in the High Court this week. Miss Etchingham, now married to a doctor, appeared to be in control. Miss Dannemann, an East German-born former ice-skater, appeared sad and isolated as she scribbled endless notes for her lawyers.
She continued to paint pictures of Hendrix up until her death. The court was told that she had been forced to sell some of her paintings to support herself, and was also in ill-health.
In her recent interview, she said: “I never go out and socialise. I’m just working on my art.”
Miss Dannemann had earlier lost a libel action and was ordered to pay £1,000 damages and costs after alleging that Miss Etchingham “would cheat and lie for money” and stole the guitarist’s belongings from his flat while he was away on tour. The claims resurfaced in 1995 when Miss Danneman published The Inner World of Jimi Hendrix, to coincide with the anniversary of his death. Holding her in contempt on Wednesday, Mr Justice French said that no public interest would be served by jailing her or by imposing a financial penalty.
Police were called to her home at 9.40am yesterday after her mother, Rosemarie, raised the alarm. At the cottage, a male relative said: “She was very upset by the court case this week. She did not leave a note. Nobody seems to know what happened.”
It appeared Miss Dannemann’s life was spiraling out of control and the court ruling just finally broke her. Miss Dannemann said she had been in ‘poor health’ as of late but never divulged her physical ailments. Miss Dannemann was 50 years old. Police are treating the death as suicide and the coroner has been informed awaiting an autopsy.
Hi Jason, Explains it all really. What I find interesting is the contrast between Monika and Kathy in this article. Unfortunately Monika paid the ultimate price for her delusions.
Hi Ivana,
Monika always appeared sullen and withdrawn in every picture I’ve seen of her. Even in the few pictures she was seen with Jimi looked awkward. It wasn’t natural. I didn’t know she was experiencing health problems at the time of her death so that was a probably a factor with her suicide. Also, nothing was written about foul play, so that takes care of the bogus conspiracy theories claiming Monika was “murdered”. A relative said she was depressed over the court case. Monika spent two decades
lying about her relationship with Jimi and the circumstances of his death and it was all exposed. She lived for Jimi, and after she was seen as a fraud to the world, she decided to end it especially if she was in poor health.
Hi Jason, One of the documentary makers described Monika as gloomy and plain and couldn’t understand what Jimi saw in her. Then there’s that photo of Jimi and Monika surrounded by a whole group of other people taken in Germany that Monika had all the others blocked out to make it look as if she and Jimi were having a romantic night out just the two of them. Monika sure went out of her way to keep the myth of her relationship with Jimi alive.
Hi Ivana,
That’s how Monika looked in every photo that I’ve seen of her…gloomy and plain.
All her photos with Jimi were awkward and casual. Not how an engaged couple would interact with each other.
She tried her hardest to make more out of their relationship than it was over the years she was alive.
Jimi couldn’t refute her claims but many other people associated with Jimi stated they were not engaged as she was just an infatuated groupie.
Monika always went to the media with her “stories” of her and Jimi being happy and in love almost about to be married. There was no evidence of this but only her “stories” that it was going to happen. Unfortunately, they gave her a platform to spread misinformation without fact checking her made up claims.
Monika wanted to create this fantasy about her and Jimi so she could always be linked to him forever in history as them being together. She enjoyed getting the media attention and living her life for Jimi through her paintings. But eventually, her lies were exposed and the charade ended. She then had nothing to live for anymore which is why she killed herself from the shame and embarrassment she would have to face from the public and Jimi’s fans. Her poor health was likely another factor in her fatal decision.
Exactly Jason, It’s curious that when Monika divorced Uli Jon Roth she went back to marketing herself as Jimi’s fiancée probably in an attempt to sell more copies of her book ‘The Inner World of Jimi Hendrix’. The things said in this book about Kathy and Dee Mitchell who Monika called two Miss Marple types landed Monika in court and eventually led to her suicide. If you look at the timeline of Monika’s first meeting with Jimi back in 1969 she really spent very little time with him from 1969 to 1970. It all adds up to only a matter of days hardly the way you treat someone you intend to marry. Jimi asked a few women to marry him but I don’t think it was meant to be taken seriously.
Monika met Jimi in January of 1969 in Germany.
She claimed herself that she met up with Jimi again during April 1969 in London spending “well over a week” with him. There hasn’t been one other person who was able to validate her claims. A biographer said it might have been only “one night” if that, because Jimi was busy playing and spending time with his associates. Nobody remembers Monika being around Jimi at that time in London.
The next time they met was unfortunately in September of 1970 where he spent a few days with her before and the morning of his death. So, that was over a whole year that he didn’t see her and Jimi wouldn’t marry someone he hardly knew after just a few days. He didn’t even marry Kathy and he spent most of his time with her. He certainly wouldn’t be engaged to Monika after only two or three meetings. That’s why her “stories” are all made up and she pretended to know Jimi more than she was letting on.
Another thing to look at is the incident at Harvey’s, where he witnessed Monika being verbally abusive to Jimi. Harvey said he was ‘feeling genuinely concerned’ for Jimi’s well being. Also, Jimi didn’t want Monika at Kameron’s party that night. If Monika was indeed his fiancee, he would have wanted her to be there with his friends and associates instead of leaving her behind only to have her pick him up. She caused a another scene as she demanded Jimi to leave the party early when he wasn’t ready to go promting party guests to yell at and insult her over the intercom. Again, not the behavior of two lovebirds about to tie the knot in the coming weeks.
Monika made up a story to the authorities and the press why Jimi didn’t want her there at the party. Those weren’t “dangerous people” as she claimed, those were his friends and associates he recorded with. Seems like she was trying to paint an ominous setting already just like she made up her “mobster” claims a few years later to get herself off the hook for her negligence and to keep her fantasy charade going of them about to get married.
Uli Jon Roth seemed to always be overshadowed with Monika’s obsession of Jimi and he became irritated during interviews when it was brought up to him about Monika’s infatuation with Jimi after all those years. That’s probably one of the main factors of their divorce.
Monika used Jimi as a gravy train for paintings and her books so it’s no surprise she would go back to making that her full time livelihood to use for income. If Monika wasn’t controversial attacking Kathy, Dee, and Noel in her book she might still be alive today continuing her charade. Although, if she was in poor health 24 years ago that might not be the case today.
Hi Jason, Jimi was the cash cow for a number of people it seems. I remember reading that Monika said Jimi didn’t like the people at the party and they were not his friends. She even claimed the flat where the party was held was deserted the next day even accusing people of poisoning Jimi and the Mafia murdering him. Any intelligent person can see right through her fantasies and lies. At least we don’t need to deal and answer those dumb conspiracy theories any more and just deal with the established facts.
After Jimi left Monika he was filmed kissing Uschi Obermaier outside his hotel. Even though Jimi wrote about his ideal woman in songs like Angel and The New Rising Sun he was attracted to and attracted the earthier type of woman.
Hi Ivana,
Jimi is still a cash cow for all these fraudsters and hoaxers that write these garbage Hendrix “murder” conspiracy books. Also, former acquaintances and one time band members who add a phony murder claim in their boring books in order to sell copies.
Yeah, Monika called the party guests “bad” and “dangerous” people which was a complete lie.
Her “mafia claim” is a total b.s. cuz she admitted she gave Jimi her Vesparax pills and then she spent the rest of her life making up lies, changing stories, and coming up with new fake stories to get herself off the hook.
It’s nice coming here and not having to read nonsense from a conspiracy kook that invents his own fake stories.
Hi Jason, Caesar Glebbeek even interviewed Monika on a radio show where she claimed the Mafia killed Jimi. You would think someone like Caesar would be able to see right through her statements and just treat them as nonsense with no basis in fact. She should never have been invited in the first place. This sort of rubbish information just feeds the minds of tin foil hatters and is on the same level as those trashy novels and publications.
People in the media like to use quacks for ratings. They let guests spout off nonsense on air to stir up controversy so listeners have a hot button topic to discuss. But that allows for conspiracy theories to start. Caesar should have called her lies out right away since tin foil hatters now use that lie for their hoaxes. In his book, he confirmed Jimi died from an overdose as we all know he did. Allowing Monika to spread fiction on air did a great disservice to Jimi and Caesar let it happen.
I heard Kathy Etchingham say in an interview that Monika had never worked and that her lifestyle and house in Seaford England was paid for by her father. A neighbour also observed that Monika had a new Mercedes every year. This contradicts statements made by Monika that she had very little money and lived off the paintings she sold.
That seems about right because she wasn’t working when she was with Jimi in 1970 and never did anything after. She married Uli Jon Roth so he probably bought her new cars as well. The only occupation she had was a “painter”.
After Jimi died, Monika tried to promote herself to design the artwork for Jimi’s posthumous albums and Jeffery rejected her and she held a grudge against him and the management ever since. She told her made up story of how Jimi wanted to get married and he would record new music and she would design the album covers for him.
She did design 3 album covers for Roth’s band Electric Sun and probably received royalties for doing it but those weren’t big selling albums. And she did write a book, but that was later, and was probably the largest income she received for doing work.
Monika was lying again.
Check out the album covers for Roth’s band Electric Sun.
Hi Jason, I can’t help thinking that part of Monika’s attraction for Jimi was his high profile and status. She stated that her heart always belonged to Jimi and that was her reason for divorcing Roth. Having that continual association to Jimi, Monika thought would help her get ahead somehow. I’m not sure how much Roth earned throughout his career but I’m certain it was no where near the amount Jimi
pocketed.
I read before that Monika hung around other musicians during the late 60’s and then became a groupie seeking out famous musicians at the time. I agree with the status attraction and she wanted to use Jimi as well to further her career as a painter designing album covers. Same thing with Roth as she designed 3 album covers for Roth’s band Electric Sun.
Roth left the Scorpions in 1978 well before they became a world popular rock band and had the massive fame and fortune, but he did live off the royalties of the albums he performed on. His band Electric Sun never became a big band. So yeah, he never made the kind of money Jimi made. I just read an article where Roth went bankrupt 15 years ago and at the time was worth a half million pounds.
Hi Ivana,
Well, ex convicted fraud doctor Fraud Bannister wanted to get some more publicity and return to the limelight in Jimi’s 50th anniversary of his death. Every 10 years he returns to change his phony stories trying to portray himself as a “hero”. He is a total fraud. See if you notice where he changed his phony story from previous years. This whole article is a joke.
“Jimi Hendrix death: Doctor describes horrifying details of night rock legend died”
JIMI HENDRIX tragically died in 1970 after he was asphyxiated during his sleep after a drinking session – now, the doctor who worked on saving Hendrix’s life has spoken out about what the night in question was like, giving some of the gruesome details surrounding the treatment he gave.
Jimi Hendrix fans were simply devastated when the “Purple Haze” hitmaker died September 18, 1970. 50 years ago the star had unfortunately asphyxiated on his own vomit, prompting him to be rushed to hospital in London.
Hendrix was accompanied by his girlfriend at the time, Monika Dannemann.
Although it seemed as if she got him to the hospital in a quick fashion, it was far too late to save the icon said the doctor.
Dr. Bannister who worked on Hendrix during his arrival at the hospital spoke out on what his experience was during that fateful night.
Dr Bannister explained: “We worked really hard on him for about half an hour.”
Bannister did what he could to save the rock legend as what was called a ‘life and death’ situation.
He went on to give some gruesome details about the night he never forgot 50 years later.
Dr Bannister continued: “But there was not a breath.”
“His oesophagus was full of wine. There was wine everywhere.”
The young doctor at the time – now 78 years old, recalled how lifeless the guitar legend had been when he arrived.
“He’d obviously been dead for at least half an hour,” he said.
Dr Bannister also went on to detail Hendrix’s girlfriend at the time, Dannemann.
“She was very upset,” he said. “It was a very sad situation.”
Dr Bannister didn’t even realise who he was treating, he later recalled.
Upon being asked by a colleague if he knew who he had just seen, he said he didn’t know.
“I didn’t know who Jimi Hendrix was,” he explained. “I had no idea.”
Hi Jason, First and foremost he’s a fool for contradicting the other doctors and Dr. Teare and Dr Thurston. So Monika rushed Jimi to the hospital in quick fashion and he’d been dead for just half an hour instead of the five or six. His oesophagus was full of wine instead of his lungs now. No other doctor saw Monika at the hospital otherwise they would have asked her who they were dealing with and not have to wait for Gerry Stickells to identify the body. Bannister has more or less stuck to that dumb drowning by wine story he just loves to exploit. Jimi didn’t die because of the alcohol but because of the barbiturates. They are deliberately changing the story.
Perhaps our “good doctor” would benefit from reading the findings of Kathy’s investigation. Like we both know there was no hint of foul play involved in Jimi’s death or massive amounts of red wine contributing to his death. Like Dr. Crompton said, Jimi could’ve have possibly survived that overdose of barbiturates.
Doesn’t Fraud Bannister realize that he sounds like a total idiot?
Here he’s claiming to have “worked hard” to have “saved Jimi’s life” and then he says Jimi was already dead when he came in.
He has zero credibility and only the tin foil hatters take this fraud seriously.
He’s the one who turned Jimi’s barbiturate overdose death into an alcohol related death and then Lying Sharon Lawrence and Tappy “The Fraud” Wright added to the tale with bogus tales of their own. Then the tin foil hatters combined all 3 fake stories along with their own fake claims to peddle their conspiracy theories.
Lawrence and Wright were both debunked.
Ivana,
Bannister’s whole new story is a joke and that was a poorly written article.
Bannister first claimed Jimi’s stomach and lungs was “full of wine” and now he makes no mention of it. Now it’s only Jimi’s oesophagus.
He also stated before that Jimi was dead for ‘several hours’ and now he’s saying Jimi was dead for only a ‘half hour’.
Bannister says it was a “life and death” situation when he just said Jimi was already dead when he was brought in.
Now he has Monika Dannemann rushing Jimi to the hospital herself when even Monika never has claimed to have done that.
Nothing about the barbiturates that was the official cause of death.
He should have quit while he was ahead as his phony story unravels even more with contradictions.
Bannister has made up an entirely different story from what he first told back in 1992.
Yes, he does sound like a fool and in 10 years he will make up something new.
The only old lie he kept in his fake story was he “worked hard to save Jimi’s life” but then he admits Jimi was already dead.
I’m sure he told similar lies in court when he was convicted for fraud in 1992.
Hi Jason, As the saying goes Dr Wine is digging his own grave. This guy is making it up as he goes along have you noticed his story is becoming more and more dramatic at every telling changing details to make it sound more and more appealing to the reader. Bannister is an attention seeker who really should be ignored and forgotten. I very much doubt he remembers anything about the day Jimi was brought in that’s why he needs to invent details.
Hi Ivana,
That Bannister article was a propaganda piece to keep the phony conspiracy going.
The mass media shouldn’t even give him any coverage when they even state near the end of the articles that Bannister was “convicted of fraud” and his allegations haven’t been confirmed.
He said Jimi was “extremely tall” and was “naked” when he was wheeled in as neither was true. Then he changes his fake wine claims of “lungs and stomach” to just the ospehegus. He even said Jimi had a “half a bottle of wine” in his hair and was soaked wet with wine but Jimi was dead for several hours and both ambulance men said Jimi was dry with vomit. Now Monika Dannemann drove him to the hospital he claims when we all know Jimi was already dead transported by ambulance.
Bannister doesn’t remember any of the real events of that day, he just invents fake dramatic stories just as you said to appeal to the reader to make himself appear to be a “hero” after he was struck off the medical register in disgrace.
The earlier news reports of Jimi’s death never mentioned wine at all; his death was always drugs related, at first illicit drugs but after the inquest this changed to a barbiturate overdose which was the true and correct cause of death. Why would anyone need to tamper with Dr. Teare’s autopsy findings. He surely would not have missed any traces of wine on Jimi’s body. Dr. Teare detected wine in Jimi’s urine and blood but not excessive amounts that would have contributed to Jimi’s death.
27 November, 1942. Jimi would have been 78 if he hadn’t passed away in 1970.
Jimi Hendrix was born on this day: November 27, 1942
If Jimi was still alive he would have been the same age as The Rolling Stones and Paul McCartney. It’s tragic that he only had 27 years on this Earth and only 3 years to be making music because there was so much more greatness he had to accomplish.
Hard to believe its 50 years from 1970. Today also marks the 50th anniversary of George Harrison’s All Things Must Past masterpiece album. Lots of amazing albums having their 50th and even 40th anniversary.
So very well said Jason. People of Jimi’s caliber should always be remembered.
I read that Alvenia Bridges told Monika to turn Jimi on his side during Monika’s phone call. I’d like to believe it but it sounds like something one of the ambulance attendants said. Eric Burdon also urged Monika to call for an ambulance but she was reluctant to do so because there were illicit drugs at the flat. At a later stage Monika and Eric both accused each other of lying about the details of that phone conversation. What’s clear is that the high dosage of Vesparax Jimi took knocked him out immediately as he was found fully clothed on top of the bed and there was a delay in calling the ambulance because Jimi was covered in dry vomit, and had internal signs of someone who had been dead for quite a while.
Pretty much all the stories these people told are irrelevant as far as I’m concerned. They all made false claims, contradicted their own stories, changed their stories around, and contradicted each other making the stories useless. All they were doing was trying their best to paint themselves in a positive light in the media so they could escape blame of having any responsibility in Jimi’s death.
The only thing that matters is that Jimi was neglected in his time of need and the autopsy results proved it was a lethal overdose.
These are the facts that can’t be disputed by anybody.
So true. Rather than appearing in a positive light they’re having the opposite effect. It’s because of their contradictions that we didn’t get the full story. All we got were cover-ups and subterfuge not helped by conspiracy theories of murder, fictional biographies and one rogue doctor. Like you said Jason the autopsy results speak for themselves.
Hi Ivana,
Even with all the contradictions and false stories we have a pretty good picture of what happened.
Monika got scared and didn’t help Jimi when he needed it and the others didn’t want to be associated with Jimi’s death so they all attempted distance themselves. And as a result, we have a bunch of different stories where conspiracy theories are allowed to take hold.
We really don’t need to look further than the death certificate and the autopsy results to find out how Jimi died. Those biographies published decades after Jimi died are just trying to outdo one another with outrageous claims of murder and suicide hoping someone will buy and believe what’s written in them.
Well said Ivana.
Most of those books are just tabloid journalism designed to publish an outrageous claim in order to sell copies.
Tappy “The Fraud” Wright took Fraud Bannister’s and Sharon Lawrence’s phony wine claims and outdid them by making up his own phony story accusing Michael Jeffery of murder which was easily proven to be a lie.
Hi Jason, I think it was Noel Redding who accused all the women who supposedly knew Jimi personally as just wanting to feather their own nests. I remember an article about a woman named Lorraine James who said she saw Jimi at a party where she accused Jimi of doing all sorts of things. She later confessed that she made the whole thing up just to get her name in the papers alongside Jimi. Another example of sensationalist tabloid journalism.
There was various individuals that claimed to have met up with Jimi the night before he died or a couple of days before giving their own “accounts” and they all turned out to be false. How could Jimi be with all those different people in all those different places all at once? What some people will do just get their name in the papers.
Some of these other fraudsters like Sharon Lawrence and Fraud Bannister want to be enshrined in Hendrix history with their names attached to his so they will always be remembered. They both should be forgotten as a couple of phonies.
Ivana, was this what you were talking about with Lorraine James?
“Although he left to go to the business meeting, he next showed up at a flat in the Fulham Road area. It belonged to a girl who worked in the Chelsea Drug Store, Lorraine James. How or why he chose her flat isn’t known but she described his arrival: “He was obviously high on drugs and he had a lot of cannabis on him. He was in a terrible state, highly nervous”. He spent several hours on a pay phone in the building. He was complaining about not being able to sleep. That night, Lorraine watched him spend the night with two American chicks; they were at it until five in the morning.
Wednesday was spent looking for drugs, visiting houses around London. Hendrix was “out of his mind”. One guy they met was so bad, he jumped a couple of flights down a stair well. He was taken to hospital with broken legs. With all this going on, Hendrix got weird and ran around the house screaming. Thursday, like any normal perIson after the excess of the previous days, Hendrix was unconcious in a girlfriend’s flat in the Fulham area during the day. That night, it was back to the usual routine. More women and more drugs. You have to hand it to him, the man was consistant.”
Hi Jason, That’s it alright. I find this article really demeaning towards Jimi. The papers will just publish anything outrageous, at least she confessed it was all made up.
Hi again Jason, There was a even worse one than that article and it appeared in the Curtis Knight biography of Jimi. It was an interview given by Kathy to a journalist friend who then decided to rewrite it so that it made Jimi look like a violent drug addicted nutcase. Kathy later received an apology from the newspaper but it just shows the lengths some people will go to in order to sell a book as we’ve both seen time and time again.
Hi Ivana,
Because of Curtis Knight there was a couple of more anonymous writers that told about violent drunken and drug fueled rages they claimed Jimi had but never documented a verifiable source. People reading that fiction would think Jimi was an out of control maniac. Fraudsters latch on to these original false claims and add their own ridiculous fake stories hoping to make money off it or just to receive publicity.
This has been going on for decades.
The only problem with that is, a lot of people don’t read the confession and only read the disparaging stories designed to damage Jimi’s character believing it’s true.
That happens a lot these days when false accusations are published getting the biggest headlines and the retraction is barely mentioned going unnoticed. People then form a negative opinion based on false accusations that never should have been printed.
Hi Jason, So true. Hopefully forums like this one and others help dispel some of the myths surrounding Jimi. Most of these biographies stick to a particular formula: sex, drugs and rock’n’roll.
I wonder what made Monika decide to rent a flat in Notting Hill. This is someone from a supposedly wealthy background staying in a seedy part of London back then in the 60’s. I’m sure Jimi would never have heard of the place. He would have been staying at the better suburbs like his Mayfair flat.
She booked the Samarkand in August through her travel agents so I’m not sure why she rented that place. That area was well known for drug activity.
LOL
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/user-328.html
Good one, Jason. At least they had the good sense to ban Albert Doyle aka as our “friend”.
I’m not sure how true the story about Monika and the Hendrix Family having a falling out. It was claimed that she was asked to leave their house in Seattle after one her many visits there. I wonder if it had anything to do with her “fiancée” status or perhaps what happened the night Jimi died.
It must have been for those reasons. Was that story officially disputed by the Hendrix family?
Hi Jason, I don’t think they said anything either way. During the investigation into Jimi’s death, Janie said no-one was to blame for his death. Might be just another nonsense story.
There was an article about Jimi’s dad Al that i believe didn’t dispute it but I can’t find it.
Hi Jason, biographer Philip Norman doesn’t paint a very flattering picture of Al Hendrix as a father. According to some accounts Jimi had very dysfunctional parents and his childhood wasn’t a very happy one. Kathy remembers a phone call Jimi made to his father to tell him he was in London but apparently Jimi’s father was more interested in not being charged for the phone call, and he just hung up. I don’t think Kathy had a particular liking for the Hendrix Family.
There was also some misunderstanding between Kathy and members of Jimi’s family during the unveiling of the Blue Plaque outside Jimi’s flat when they accused Kathy of not sending them invitations to the event which turned out to be untrue in the end. There’s no love lost there.
I’ve read that both Al and Jimi’s mother Lucille were both alcoholics and the heavy drinking is what caused the death of Lucille at a young age. She was found unconscious outside a bar in the alley and was taken to the hospital where her spleen ruptured and she died. It was determined she was suffering from cirrhosis of the liver which caused her death. Al refused to let Jimi and Leon attend her funeral and they never did forgive him for that. Al never really had a good relationship with Jimi when he was alive.
I’m not surprised Jimi had the view about marriage that he did judging from his parents’ marriage. Al remarried an Asian lady with Janie as their daughter and Jimi’s half sister. At least Al tried to find out what happened to his son’s earnings as it was reported that Jimi had only $20,000 in his account at the time of his death. Al was also surprised at how meagre Jimi’s New York apartment was with very little furniture and a few rugs and cushions scattered about. I think Al was expecting to see some sort of luxury that compared with Jimi’s status.
I’ve been listening to the song ‘My Friend’ from the ‘Cry of Love’ album where Jimi sang that the only friend he had was himself. I remember reading that Jimi had few close friends but a lot of acquaintances. I think he was well aware that his world was a very superficial one and perhaps people sought him out because of his fame. He died in the flat of a relative stranger in a seedy part of London at that time.
A lot of people used Jimi and took advantage of his generosity, and after he died, we saw all the fraudsters make money off his death with their phony tales in their tabloid books. Those people were not his real friend.
Kathy and Chas Chandler spoke about all the hangers on that used to be inside the recording studio bringing a bad environment. Chandler got fed up and quit because of it and was a reason why Kathy ended the relationship.
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR
As Christmas 1969 beckoned, Jimi Hendrix, bassist Billy Cox, and drummer Buddy Miles engaged in extensive rehearsals for their highly anticipated appearances at the Fillmore East in New York.
Branded by Hendrix as the “Band Of Gypsys,” the trio worked feverishly rounding such exciting new original material as “Izabella” and “Machine Gun” into form. Keenly aware of the special significance his forthcoming concerts represented, Jimi wanted to prepare something extraordinary for his audience. To mark the occasion in his own inimitable fashion, Jimi readied this special medley of holiday favorites to celebrate both Christmas and the dawning of a new decade.
This recording was made at Baggy’s Studios, a Manhattan rehearsal facility the group preferred. It by no means should be considered a polished studio recording made to Hendrix’s exacting specifications. It is, instead, perhaps even more revealing. This is a glimpse of Jimi simply having fun in the company of close friends.
The photograph of Jimi posing as Santa Claus was originally organized on behalf of the UK music newspaper Record Mirror. To help publicize the December 1967 release of Axis: Bold As Love, the group’s second album, Jimi agreed to pose as Santa for the issue’s cover. An alternate photograph from that session, with Jimi bearing gifts in the form of Axis: Bold As Love, is featured here.
As an added bonus, also included is Jimi’s playful “Three Little Bears”. This track was recorded with the Experience at the Record Plant in May 1968 during sessions for Electric Ladyland. Bypassed for that album, “Three Little Bears” was originally issued as part of the 1972 posthumous compilation War Heroes. It has been unavailable in the US for nearly twenty-five years.
Tracks:
1. Little Drummer Boy / Silent Night / Auld Lang Syne
2. Three Little Bea
3. Little Drummer Boy / Silent Night / Auld Lang Syne (Extended Version)
https://www.jimihendrix.com/music/merry-christmas-and-happy-new-year/
Tracks:
1. Little Drummer Boy / Silent Night / Auld Lang Syn
2. Three Little Bears
3. Little Drummer Boy / Silent Night / Auld Lang Syne (Extended Version)
Hi Jason, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. What a way to bring in the New Year attending and listening to The Band of Gypsies at the Fillmore. 🥳 Love the photo of Jimi dressed as Santa.
Hi Ivana,
Hope you have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Jason🎅
Really enjoyed listening to Three Little Bears I haven’t heard this song before. Little Drummer Boy is my favourite Christmas carol. Came across a cover version of the Valleys of Neptune on YouTube; sounded just like Jimi.
I always like to hear a song I’ve never heard before. Thought you would enjoy it during the holiday season.
Jimi Hendrix
December 31, 1969
https://jimihendrix.com/encyclopedia-item/december-31-1969-prior-to-their-two-concerts-later-that-evening-hendrix-and-his-band-of-gypsys-held-an-afternoon-sound-check-and-rehearsal-at-the-fillmore-east/
Hi Jason, I’ll repeat Jimi’s words Happy New Year first of all. It’s the 1st January, 2021 in Australia. Really interesting reading from a photographer’s take on the concert. I have the Band of Gypsies album and the part I find unforgettable is where Jimi dedicated ‘Machine Gun’ to some of the violence going on in the world at that time hoping for peace in 1970.
Australia always gets to celebrate the new year first and in the summer!
Let’s hope for a better and peaceful 2021.
Hendrix Archives:
January 28, 1970
Billed as the “Winter Festival For Peace”
Billed as the “Winter Festival For Peace,” Peter Yarrow (Peter, Paul & Mary) and Sid Bernstein, event producers, announced that their services would be donated and that all proceeds of the event will go to the Vietnam Moratorium effort. The five-hour festival slated from 8 p.m. to 1 a.m. will feature Harry Belafonte; Blood, Sweat & Tears; Dave Brubeck; Richie Havens; Mother Earth; Peter, Paul & Mary; The Rascals; The Cast of Hair; Judy Collins, and Jimi Hendrix & his Band Of Gypsys.
Suffering from exhaustion and the effects of a drink laced with an unknown substance taken before the show, Hendrix failed to execute his musical plans this evening. Having completed just two songs, “Who Knows” and “Earth Blues” the only thing Hendrix could do at that point was drop his guitar and sit down on the stage, meanwhile Miles and Cox continue to roll through the back beats. As Alfred Aronowitz later recalled in his New York Post column, “The crowd has already gotten twice its money’s worth when Jimi Hendrix stopped playing in the middle of his second number, said ‘That’s what happens when Earth ***** with Space, never forget that, that’s what happens.’” … “Jimi got up, put his guitar down and walked offstage.”
“When he came off stage,” explained Alan Douglas “he actually fell off the apron. At first I thought he was hurt, but he wasn’t. I then ran backstage to the dressing room to see if in fact he was okay. There he was sitting playing the guitar and smiling. I don’t know what went through his mind when he was on stage, but the first thing I noticed, it looked like he was having a big rhythm problem. I think he just got fed up.”
Backstage, Jimi meets Johnny Winter. In recounting the meeting Winter explains, “I saw Jimi backstage at the Madison Square Garden concert, the one where he just couldn’t play. When I saw him, it have me chills. It was the most horrible thing I’d ever seen. He came in with this entourage of people, and it was like he was already dead. He just walked in – and even though Jimi and I weren’t the greatest of friends, we always talked, always – and he came in with his head down, sat on the couch alone, and put his head in his hands. He didn’t say a word to anybody, and no one spoke to him. He didn’t move until it was time for the show. He really wanted to do that gig, but he never should have. It wasn’t that it was bad, but his whole thing was inspiration, and there wasn’t any. It was just completely uninspired; finally, right in the middle of a song, he just took his guitar off, sat on the stage – the band was still playing – and told the audience, “I’m sorry, we just can’t get it together.” One of his people said he was sick, and lead him off stage. He was just so unhappy that there was no way that he could play the show. It didn’t have anything to do with the group – he had already died!”
Hi Jason, What a sad article. Interesting that Johnny Winter was one of the few musicians at Jimi’s funeral. I think Jimi’s management should have known better than to let him play at Madison Square Garden. I remember Noel Redding saying that Jimi was rude to a member of the audience damaging his reputation because of what was said. From what’s written in this article I’m surprised Jimi lasted as long as he did.
Jimi needed a break during that period and if he had time to relax and get himself together things would have been different. Seems like Jimi enjoyed recording in the studio more than playing gigs. I read somewhere that Al didn’t want a lot of musicians at Jimi’s funeral but not sure if that was an accurate account.
I think at the beginning of his career, Jimi really enjoyed what he was doing but later on it became a matter of be careful what you wish for. I just don’t think he was thinking clearly when he took those barbiturates. Who knows what frame of mind he was in at the time. I read that he had been up for a couple of days before returning to the Samarkand Hotel with Monika so Jimi wouldn’t have been thinking straight at all.
Add to the fact he was drinking all evening and took a powerful amphetamine not knowing how strong the barbiturates were.
Hi Ivana,
That’s why Harvey kept quiet but it’s too bad he didn’t tell his story back then.
All contributing to his decision that night.
I also read that Jimi and Monika were arguing most of the time during his final hours so Jimi wouldn’t have been unable to unwind and relax.
Monika was fighting with Jimi in public and she admitted they were arguing later at the Samarkand until she changed her story that they were a “happy couple”.
I guess in some areas a section is considered to be “exclusive” even though the properties don’t seem to look like it.
Even at the inquest, Monika painted a very rosy picture of her relationship with Jimi when she said there was no argument or stress it was a very happy atmosphere back at the Samarkand. We now know it was the exact opposite.
Too bad Harvey didn’t tell his story then of Monika berating Jimi after she stormed out of his flat. Her lies told a very different story and she was able to create a false image of herself and Jimi. She continued to do it for decades until she killed herself when she was outed as a liar. Even in her last tv interview she still lied and told b.s. of her relationship with Jimi.
Hi Jason, I think Harvey kept quiet out of respect for his father who was in politics. I’m not sure whether I like or dislike this guy for keeping this to himself for so long. Monika should have been questioned a lot more and other people could have been invited to give their side of the story at the inquest. I suppose all that really mattered back then was what caused Jimi’s death.
I find the description of Harvey’s townhouse where Jimi and Monika had their argument as interesting. While it looks like a very nice place to live in a quiet part of London it doesn’t exactly look opulent as detailed in some articles. 😏
Jimi Hendrix “Live in Maui” is available on vinyl.
Experience Hendrix announces a brand new collection that couples the brand new feature-length documentary Music, Money, Madness . . . Jimi Hendrix In Maui with the accompanying live performances on both audio and video. The film chronicles the Jimi Hendrix Experience s storied visit to Maui, their performance on the dormant lower crater of Haleakala volcano on the island, and how the band became ensnared with the ill-fated Rainbow Bridge movie produced by their controversial manager Michael Jeffery. Directed by John McDermott and produced by Janie Hendrix, George Scott and McDermott, the documentary incorporates never before released original footage and new interviews with firsthand participants and key players such as Billy Cox, Eddie Kramer, Warner Bros. executives and several Rainbow Bridge cast members, as well as its director Chuck Wein.
The Blu-ray will include the full documentary as well as the 16mm color film shot of the two afternoon performances captured on July 30, 1970, mixed in both stereo and 5.1 surround sound. Also included in the package will be Live In Maui both of the aforementioned sets spread across 2 CDs, newly restored and mixed by longtime Jimi Hendrix engineer Eddie Kramer, and mastered by Bernie Grundman.
The 2 sets find The Experience – Hendrix, Billy Cox on bass, Mitch Mitchell on drums – at the height of its powers playing flawlessly against a stunning natural backdrop. Included are breathtaking renditions of crowd favorites like “Foxey Lady,” “Purple Haze” and Voodoo Child (Slight Return),” as well as then-unreleased songs like “Dolly Dagger” and “Freedom” that showcased the new direction Hendrix was moving toward.
Hi Jason, Great to see vinyl making a comeback big time. The marketing of the original Rainbow Bridge soundtrack was deceptive as none of the tracks were from Jimi’s live set on Maui. I have the movie on VHS and I think the only reason it got any publicity or attention was because of Jimi’s concert. It was a silly movie about all sorts of fantastical topics my favourite being the woman who knew people from the planet Venus who she described as being noble. ☺️
Watched a terrific interview with Billy Cox and Eddie Kramer on Nights with Alice Kooper talking about Live on Maui. Billy Cox’ expression and reminiscences are just priceless.
Yeah that’s true about the soundtrack. Haha I never did see the movie but now I will try to find a copy.
Is the interview available online?
In an issue of Musician in 1996 Dr. Rufus Crompton wrote “it is impossible to ascertain the exact time of Hendrix’s death.”
Which is what I’ve said all along because Crompton was never there in 1970 to determine the time of death and the changing of stories amongst all the players never did pinpoint an exact time of death, it was always estimated. I’ve argued that point with the trolls online.
That also dismantles the bogus claim that fraudsters use to claim Hendrix died at 5:30 in the morning.
Hi Jason, The interview is online. I think Crompton was right in focusing on the damage done by the dosage of the Vesparax and not the timeframe. Monika kept changing the time she woke up I really doubt she went to sleep at all since Jimi was found fully clothed, and Eric Burdon insists she rang very early in the morning and he said there was fog on Monika’s car when he got to the Samarkand. This is where the ambulance attendants version is crucial because they said Jimi looked like he had been dead for a while. What’s also sad is that the wine story is making its way into these later biographies but was absent from the earlier ones written close to Jimi’s death.
Hi Ivana,
I’ll look for that interview.
The time really doesn’t make any difference since Jimi needed help right away after he ingested the 9 pills. The damage was done after he was knocked out by the Vesparax and it absorbed into his liver. Like Crompton said, the reading was so high he wouldn’t have survived even if he didn’t choke on his vomit. He needed help fast and it was too long and the damage was done.
Monika claimed to have taken a pill herself which is doubtful since the Vesparax would have knocked her out.
Burdon contradicted himself as well so I don’t even know if he is reliable with the story about the fog.
Yeah not only in the biographies but in recent articles as well they mention “wine” and skip over the barbiturates that was the cause of Jimi’s death.
It also depends on the time Monika and Jimi got back to the Samarkand Hotel after they left Kameron’s party and the actual time Jimi took the Vesparax. At any rate the high dosage Jimi took would have knocked him out really quickly. Dr Crompton revisited the pathology report of Dr. Teare, and like you said he was in no position to speculate on the time of death. I think all they cared about was what caused Jimi’s death. Tin foil hatters will say anything to justify and add weight to their claims.
3:00 seems to be the suggested time but it’s not written in stone as the exact time they arrived back at the Samarkand. I doubt Jimi took the pills as soon as he walked inside. So, that had to be some time after. All 3 doctors and the ambulance men said Jimi was dead for a while but nobody stated anything about rigor mortis. That would be present for a several dead hour corpse. And as we both know, a dead body would be taken directly to the morgue and not be “worked on” for any length of time. So, no time of death was established. I agree that they were more interested in the actual cause rather than the time.
Hi Jason, The ambulance arrived after 11am no way would Jimi have been alive after ingesting all that Vesparax and in all those hours. There could be another scenario that it took Jimi a while to actually die from the effects of the barbiturates he took and that could be the reason why rigor mortis had not set in yet. I think Jimi was wheeled into casualty as a precaution because there was no one about at the Samarkand to answer any questions. Dr. Seifert waited for Gerry Stickells to identify the body, and then he proceeded to complete the paperwork; the time of death being when Jimi arrived at the hospital and not the actual time of death.
That could be a possibility too, but after Bannister described the black inside Jimi’s mouth and the blue color of his face would show Jimi was dead for at least 3 hours to be in that bad of shape.
There was this one guy who ran a Hendrix fan site but no longer exists, and he had a lot of memorabilia and photos on there but he also had some newspaper articles written on the day Jimi died and the day after. One said Jimi was taken to the morgue after the formality of “resuscitation” and another said a doctor pronounced him dead in the ambulance when it arrived at St. Mary’s. So there’s another couple of stories to add to the mix.
it was the Russians, they put novichock in his underpants!
I’ve been reading about rigor mortis. If the body is still warm death occurred within 3 hours, rigor mortis present 3-9 hours, and rigor mortis fully established died 9 hours previously.
Hi Jason, At some point Jimi came into the hospital because the doctors saw him. One of the ambulance officers said that they were not allowed to certify someone as being dead so I’m assuming this was left to Dr. Seifert after his few minutes of ‘resuscitation’, and then Jimi was taken to the morgue. None of the doctors at that point said that Jimi was alive when brought in, and they all observed that Jimi looked as if he had been dead for a while. After that it was left to Dr. Teare to determine how Jimi actually died as we know.
All three doctors saw Jimi in the hospital when he was wheeled in dead. Then decades later they want to change the entire event to something completely different.
So true Jason especially our ‘good’ Dr. Wine Bannister with his litres of imaginary red wine.
Ivan, So Monika got it wrong when she accused the Mafia of poisoning Jimi, it was the Russians all along. You’re not a spy by any chance as you knew the wine bottles were stored in the Thames, and I’m assuming the novichock was there as well. 😂
haha ;)
not everything that ends up at the bottom of the Thames goes mising forrever……the wine might turn up again one day!
https://www.imore.com/iphone-8-still-works-after-spending-2-weeks-bottom-uks-river-thames
The bottles marked property of Monika Dannemann and Michael Jeffrey-the conspiracy theorists would be saying I told you so. 😀
Strange how the tuna sandwich and the spaghetti meal Monika supposedly cooked were absent during the autopsy. She deliberately made up this story to block out visiting Harvey and the subsequent argument she had with Jimi. Terry Slater was right in speaking up about this because it shows that these things never took place. It was just Monika’s way of painting an idyllic yet false picture of the relationship, if you could call it that, she had with Jimi.
After Monika got caught in the tuna fish sandwich lie she then claimed Jimi only took one bite of the sandwich. 🤣
Kathy said Jimi hated tuna fish and would never have asked for it. I’m assuming when Jimi booked his ticket back to New York it was for one. It would have been better for Monika to have just walked away when Jimi showed interest in another girl at Harvey’s place, and then not driven Jimi to Kameron’s party afterwards where she was again humiliated by some of the guests. Jimi’s guitar could have easily been forwarded onto the Cumberland Hotel. I think Monika was blinded by her obsession with Jimi she failed to see the signs that Jimi was just not really interested in her.
That’s why Monika made up the new lie of Jimi only taking a bite of it. She couldn’t say there wasn’t a sandwich after she lied about making them so she changed her story again. Monika also lied about the Kameron party too. Jimi simply didn’t want her there. She was obsessed with him and created her fantasy tale which later was exposed as a lie.
Jimi wasn’t particularly faithful to any of the women he had relationships with. I don’t think someone can change overnight and getting involved with someone like that can lead to a lot of heartache and problems if you’re expecting more.
Very true. Everybody on record stated that Jimi wasn’t ready to be married at that point in his life and all confirmed he wouldn’t be serious about marrying Monika.
Too bad Harvey wasn’t able to confirm that Jimi spent the evening at his flat so he could detail the argument between Monika and Jimi. That revelation would have proven Monika to be a liar right off the bat and it would have forced her to tell the truth.
Monika lied in her official statement claiming “she spent the entire day with Jimi indoors, cooked him a spaghetti meal in the evening, and stayed up with him talking until 2 am”.
This was an attempt by Monika to pretend they were “in love” so she could live out her delusional fantasies, but most importantly, it allowed her to escape blame and to cover up the incident at Harvey’s.
Monika then made up a bogus story about Jimi meeting some “bad people” and wanted to protect her from being there. The truth of the matter was Monika wasn’t welcome around Jimi’s friends and associates and he didn’t want her there at the party either.
Also, if Monika and Jimi were about to be engaged he would have wanted her there at Kameron’s party. And also, all of Jimi’s friends and associates would have known they were going to get married. Every person who was later asked denied that Jimi was going to marry or get engaged to Monika. Jimi barely knew Monika for less than a week aside from a one night stand a year earlier. If Jimi didn’t marry Kathy Etchingham who he spent most of his time with he certainly wouldn’t marry Monika Dannemann in less than a week of knowing her.
The facts are, we know that they were both outdoors in the afternoon and not inside all day and night at the Samarkand. Monika was taking several photographs of Jimi. After that they went driving around town and went shopping. Jimi spotted Kathy Etchingham and asked her to hang out later that night but she declined. Jimi unexpectedly met Harvey and was invited to his flat for the evening. After the evening at Harvey’s, Jimi headed over to Kameron’s party without Monika and didn’t return back to the Samarkand until the early hours of the morning. Both of them weren’t on good terms with Monika causing a scene at both locations. All of this information came out later but Monika lied and covered it up in her original statement.
There wasn’t enough time for Monika to cook spaghetti for Jimi during the evening. And as Ivana astutely pointed out, there was no evidence of a spaghetti meal in the findings of Jimi’s autopsy but only the rice meal Jimi ate at Kameron’s.
Monika’s lies were all finally exposed but it’s a shame they weren’t right after September 18, 1970 where she would have been forced to answer for them.
So true, Jason. That snake ring that Monika was passing off as proof of her engagement to Jimi even telling Jeanette Jacobs that she and Jimi were getting married. Monika even claimed that Jimi went from table to table at the Speakeasy announcing his engagement even though the owner didn’t remember this ever happening. When Monika was asked why Jimi never wore his she said that it got caught in the guitar strings when Jimi was playing which is ridiculous because Jimi played with a lot of rings on his fingers. I’m pleased that in some way we managed to expose these lies.
Well again, Monika created another fictional story because nobody could ever corroborate this tale she told. An engagement is a huge occasion, and like I said, all of Jiimi’s friends, associates, and family would have been told of the “big news” about their engagement if that was the case. Not a single person was ever informed. This whole tale was only told by Monika Dannemann herself. It was all a lie.
The snake ring wouldn’t have hampered Jimi’s guitar playing, and even if it did, he would have worn it off stage and have been showing it off to all his friends. Just another fake story from Monika.
Yes, I’m glad we were able to expose all the lies, not just one that came from Monika Dannemann, but Fraud Bannister and the hoaxers peddling the bogus “murder” conspiracy theories. All of those lies tarnish the legacy of Jimi Hendrix.
Hi Jason, Most of Jimi’s friends and associates had never heard of Monika before he died. I find Jeanette Jacobs story a sad one. She was a singer in a girl group named Cake. She married Chris Wood from Traffic but suffered a nervous breakdown after Jimi died only to die at a very young age of 30. She took Jimi’s supposed ‘engagement’ hard travelling to Amsterdam to escape it realising it was all a lie later on. It was a ploy by Monika to oust Jimi’s other ‘girlfriends’.
Hi Ivana,
Monika is only linked to Hendrix history because she was with him the morning he died. Otherwise, she would always have been insignificant and unknown to almost everybody if Jimi didn’t die. Jimi’s death gave her the opportunity to create her own fictional reality for the media and allowed her to have a “business” by painting portraits of Jimi for the rest of her pathetic life. She milked that opportunity for decades pretending to be the “love of Jimi’s life” as she kept feeding her own delusions. Sadly, the media kept interviews going through the years giving her the desperate attention she craved without ever questioning her phony and contradicting stories. If they would have asked her tough questions or made her answer for her severe contradictions, she would have immediately vanished from the spotlight and we would have never heard from her again.
Chris Wood had a tragic ending as well. He died not too long after his wife Jeanette died in the early 80’s. Her death greatly affected him. He was working on a solo album and was unable to complete it before he died. His sister finally released the album posthumously decades later in the 2000’s having to mix tracks and complete it how she envisioned Chris would have wanted it.
Chris and Jeanette both played in Ginger Baker’s Air Force in early 1970 before Steve Winwood reformed Traffic later that same year. Interestingly enough, Steve Winwood was briefly part of the Air Force and appeared on the first studio album. This was after Blind Faith disbanded.
Thanks for posting that info and Monika did a lot of damage to other people’s lives as well based on her own lies to promote her delusional fantasy.
Hi Jason, Interesting but tragic info about Chris and Jeanette. Kathy’s court case brought all of Monika’s fantasies out into the open the judge ruling there was no relationship there let alone an engagement. Mitch even confirmed that Kathy was one of the two women Jimi loved the other being Devon Wilson although towards the end of Jimi’s life he started to distance himself from her because of her heavy drug use. Devon also died tragically shortly after Jimi by either accidentally falling out of a window or as some have suggested by being pushed. I’m not sure how true either of those stories were.
Hi Ivana,
Devon Wilson was heavily into heroin in 1970 and it escalated even more after Jimi’s death. She only lived about 5 months after Jimi died. Some people say she was strung out and fell out of the window. Others said she was killed by a drug dealer for not paying up. Hoaxers say Michael Jeffery pushed her out the window for “knowing too much” lol. Maybe she just had enough and wanted to end it all. Plus being under the influence altered her state of mind. We can’t rely on the rumors because there are different stories surrounding her death. People can’t even get the floor she was on correctly. Some say the eighth floor and others say ninth.
Chris Wood plays flute on 1983 A Merman I Should Turn To Be from Jimi’s Electric Ladyland album, and it’s Jeanette’s voice complaining about the bar being closed.
I always felt that Chris had a magic flute you can hear it on full display in “Freedom Rider”. Chris could also play bass and some people have stated that he was uncredited on EL playing couple of tracks on bass but Jimi was definitely playing bass on those tracks. He also played sax on “Rainy Day, Dream Away” and “Still Raining, Still Dreaming”.
It’s kind of eerie though, because Chris Wood died in 1983, and he played on that song with 1983 in the title.
My favourite tracks from EL.
Vesparax was used as an anti psychotic medication in the 1970’s to treat people who suffered from schizophrenia and manic bi polar episodes. It was a powerful 3 combination drug tablet that also helped the person sleep so it wasn’t just a strong “sleeping pill”. Monika claimed she was given this pill due to her ice skating injury but a doctor would prescribe a different medication and not one used to treat personality disorders along with it.
Monika exhibited behavior that she wasn’t in the right frame of mind as she created her own fantasy life making Jimi Hendrix her fiancé and her lifelong obsession with him. Jimi only spent time with Monika for 3 1/2 days, and she was jealous with rage verbally abusing Jimi outside of Harvey’s flat when he showed interest in another girl. Monika also caused a scene at Kameron’s party when she came to get him and she was angry when Jimi spoke with Kathy Etchingham earlier in the afternoon. Even Ginger Baker said she was nuts.
Monika was on those pills for a reason and they sure weren’t helping her. That’s another reason why Jimi had the reaction to the medication, he never took them before plus it was a lethal dose. His other girlfriends stated he sometimes choked in his sleep and had sleep apnea so with those pills being 3 different combinations at that potent strength and with his sleeping disorder he didn’t stand a chance of survival.
You’ve got to wonder about the state of mind of someone like Monika who created a fantasy relationship around her very short time spent with Jimi. Her outburst at Harvey’s was caused by the idea that she was Jimi’s girlfriend. Jimi was trying to get Devon Wilson to go with him when Monika came by to pick him up at Kameron’s place maybe to show Monika that he was in a relationship with Devon or as a backup so he wasn’t alone with Monika. One of Monika’s friends also said she wasn’t mentally stable. I have a feeling the Vesparax was prescribed for a personality disorder rather than for sleeping. After Jimi died Monika flew back to Germany and she was photographed smiling and happy in her apartment which is odd since her ‘fiance’ Jimi died weeks earlier – says it all really about the true extent of her ‘relationship’ with Jimi.
Monika must have been severely depressed after she lost her court case against Kathy enough commit suicide shortly afterwards. Monika accused Kathy of all sorts of weird things that never took place. Jimi wrote Dolly Dagger about Devon’s dysfunctional and meaningless life from age fifteen, and her brief ‘relationship’ with Mick Jagger where she apparently drank blood from a cut in Mick’s finger. Yuck!
Exactly…..she still would have been distraught.
Monika’s doctor would have prescribed a regular sleeping pill and not a pill like Vesparax for her. I read some dosage information on Vesparax a while back and if it isn’t taken regularly it doesn’t help the patient with the disorder. So, the medication obviously wasn’t helping Monika.
I think Jimi was turned off by Monika’s behavior and wanted Devon around so he could get rid of her more easily.
Monika lied about the strength of her Vesparax pills cuz anybody taking medication knows the correct dosage and how strong they are. Monika said they were “weak” when she knew full well how strong they were. Then she changed her story to correctly say they were strong.
I posted an article a while back where one of Monika’s family members said she was “really upset” after she lost her court case. Also, a neighbor said Monika looked depressed the day before she killed herself.
Hi Jason, Monika said that her doctor prescribed Vesparax for an ice skating injury. I wonder why a sleeping medication would have helped with that if she was experiencing some sort of pain. Would Monika have been on Vesparax since 1970 until she committed suicide? What were the side effects of this drug- maybe distorted thinking? I think that Monika’s suicide had nothing to do with Jimi Hendrix; if it was then she would have done this shortly after Jimi died. As we know sleep is vital for emotional and physical well being if Monika wasn’t sleeping well this could have contributed to her state of mind. Vesparax is no longer available or at least it’s no longer prescribed by doctors so maybe it did have some long term and serious side effects.
Vesparax had sedative and hypnotic properties with a short acting barbiturate and a long acting barbiturate. The short acting Secobarbital performed as a sedative and the side effects caused confusion, nausea, vomiting, and difficulty in breathing. Those were all the symptoms Jimi Hendrix was experiencing and the high dose of 9 pills exacerbated the effects. The Brallobarbital was the long acting barbiturate which helped the person sleep and it reportedly caused a “hangover” effect the next day because of its strength. The medication was designed to slow down brain activity and the nervous system for people with personality and anxiety disorders. Vesparax wasn’t the normal prescribed sleeping pill by doctors, this was heavy stuff which was prescribed for people that had personality disorders to control mood swings and to keep them under control. I’m not sure how long before Monika was on Vesparax but I’m assuming it had to have been more than a year or two. This medication has been discontinued in most countries but it exists in South America. It started declining in use during early 80’s due to danger it posed to people who used it and other new drugs were developed that took it’s place. People at one point were using it as assisted suicides and many unintentional overdoses took place. So, Monika wouldn’t have been on Vesparax in 1996 but that’s not to say that she was on another medication to treat her issues.
Monika’s suicide had to do more with her and her lies being exposed. She made her living painting Hendrix portraits and lived her life all about Jimi Hendrix and the fantasy she created. Every interview Monika did was basically the same. She lied about what happened that morning and then she continued the lie of her and Jimi going to be married. After she accused Kathy and lost her case, Monika knew everything she was lying about would eventually come out. Back in 1970, it seemed people just took her word and never questioned her on her blatant lies and contradictions. If she was really grilled on her lies and phony stories, she might have killed herself back then as she would have faced more scrutiny since Jimi’s death just happened and everybody was still alive. There would have been more shock and outrage then instead of decades later in the 90’s when so many years passed. Also, it would mean more to people who were alive in 1970 rather than people who were born after 1970 and always knew Jimi Hendrix as being a dead legend rather than a Rock Superstar that died a tragic death.
Hi Jason, Vesparax was more of a psychological and psychiatric drug by what you’ve posted. At any rate it’s bad news. It’s been suggested that Monika deliberately didn’t mention to Jimi how potent the Vesparax actually was as retaliation for her treatment at Kameron’s party and Harvey’s place. She surely would have known that since she only took half a tablet, and nine would have been lethal. I think the fantasy stories she created about her life with Jimi were designed to make it look like she was in no way responsible for Jimi’s death. Kathy started to smell a rat in what Monika was saying about her relationship with Jimi and the events of his death, and it all came out during the investigation and court case.
Hi Ivana,
People that write about Jimi Hendrix refer to Vesparax as just a “sleeping pill” but it’s not. After I did research on it I found out how potent it is and how people who suffered from schizophrenia were prescribed that medication which was took in doses. Patients were not supposed to skip dosages because it wouldn’t work how it was designed to.
That’s very likely that Monika didn’t tell Jimi the potency of the pills. It was all written in German so Jimi wouldn’t have understood what it meant. Plus the pills came in a pack and he had to break open 9 pills to take them. Jimi might have wanted to leave after they returned to the Samarkand and as a way to keep him there she let him take an overdose. But anybody with half a brain would know taking 9 of those was lethal when they knew how potent they were.
Monika was always looking to escape blame for Jimi’s death her whole life. That’s why she contradcited her stories on the same day and made up the phony “mafia” claim in 1975 on Caesar’s radio show.
Hi Jason, I don’t understand why anyone would need to invent a conspiracy theory surrounding the death of Jimi Hendrix when it’s obvious that the drug Vesparax is extremely potent. It’s so strong that half a tablet induces a number of hours of sleep. It was also used to treat psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia in higher doses. I’ve been reading about the use of opioids to help with strong pain, and how people are becoming dependent on them needing higher dosages after a while.
I can’t help thinking that something was not quite right with Monika because of her continued fantasies and lies. Her tales reveal someone with a very vivid imagination or someone with deeper issues.
These fraudsters are looking to make money off Jimi’s death by inventing a fake tale hoping people will buy their books or click on their website. One guy had a podcast talking a bunch of nonsense and was selling t shirts and sweatshirts as a gimmick.
I think it was a combination of both. Monika had a vivid imagination along with deeper psychological issues which explains her behavior towards Jimi and others she had it in for. I don’t believe she took a half tablet as she claims cuz she would have been knocked out for hours that morning.
Hi Jason, The lengths some people will go to just to get some publicity. They know full well the more outrageous a claim is the more attention they’ll get.
As for Monika she even got Jimi’s dad to sign a piece of paper to say she was engaged to Jimi and they planned to marry.
Monika was determined to see her fantasy all the way through.
Hi Ivana,
And that attention sells books and also gets a lot of views for conspiracy videos.
Hi Jason, The saying that if something is repeated often enough by enough people it eventually becomes the truth. I think that’s how the more ridiculous conspiracies work.
I agree 100% with that. Suppress the truth and repeat the lies as the alternate truth.
Another thing that proves the “Hendrix Murder” hoax is a joke is that nobody prominent ever came forward with a real claim. It’s always these obscure jokers who were acquaintances that came forward decades later with some absurd claim to make a quick buck to sell an useless book or to gain publicity to promote themselves. In all those years they said nothing. But as soon as a book was being written decades later, they all copied Tappy “the fraud” Wright’s bogus claim adding their own spin to their fictional tales as a hook for their book.
Fraud Bannister and Tappy “The Fraud” Wright were the originators of the two worst fake stories about Jimi Hendrix for their own personal gain.
Bannister started the fake wine claim to save himself because he thought he was going to be sued again and he was going through an investigation for fraudulent conduct as a doctor. He needed a “hero” story to appear to look competent because he was also being sued for medical malpractice by more than one patient at the time. So, he changed drugs to wine as a way out of it. But he completely failed as he lost his medical license and is seen by most people as a total quack and a fraud. His lie of wine allowed conspiracy theorists to falsely make up an alcohol realted death about Jimi Hendrix while adding their own conspiracies.
Tappy “The Fraud” Wright took it a step further by using the phony wine claim for his fake story accusing Michael Jeffery of murdering Hendrix. Wright used a new fake story of both wine and pills for a murder scenario to sell copies of his lame book. He added to Bannister’s fake wine claim to make his story more outrageous. Wright failed as well because the late Bob Levine called Wright out immediately as a liar and completely discredited his fake book by setting the record straight. Wright made up a bunch of lies just to sell books. Wright’s book never sold like he wanted it to having poor sales and he died a few years after in shame.
The lies they both told is what hoaxers now use for their scam while adding new fake stories to it. If it wasn’t for Wright and Bannister, this wine and murder hoax would never even be promoted by these conspiracy theorists today.
Hi Jason, None of the people closest to Jimi ever suspected he was murdered. Like you said these outrageous claims are designed to sell books, but none of them are bestsellers. I think most people would describe them as trashy tabloid rubbish and just ignore them or not give them much weight. Funny how Wright and Bannister never came forward with these allegations close to Jimi’s death and waited decades later to reveal the ‘truth’. What a joke!
Years ago I watched a supposed ‘documentary’ about an autopsy being performed on an alien. The camera was never held still and you never got any close ups because if you did you’d soon realise this was a dummy. These stupid hoaxers are everywhere and cover a lot of subjects and all these scammers are looking for is an audience who will be easily duped into what they’re saying. 😏
Haha that’s funny. I saw one about Bigfoot and this guy was supposed to be an Indian leader of this tribe and he went with his son, a “journalist”, and a camera crew to hunt Bigfoot in the woods near the mountains. There were fake tracks made in the leaves where they claimed the creature was walking. Near the end of the program, the leader points way far out into the woods and said “Do you see that thing moving over there?” and the camera started shaking out of focus pretending to zoom in on this black blob on the other side of the woods. They quickly showed “the creature” for a second and it was someone dressed up in a costume walking through the branches. Lol.
They even had Bigfoot weekend expeditions where people paid money to “find” Bigfoot, which wasn’t cheap to go on. Like you said, these scammers are looking for a gullible audience and like the old saying goes, “a sucker is born every minute”.
Monika also claimed she was in London with Jimi in February/March 1969.
Nobody could ever place her there at that time. She was unable to produce a passport to confirm she was there. Her excuse was she couldn’t find it. Jimi was filmed with another girl during that time.
Plus she added these new phony stories decades later.
Hi Jason, I think that was when the engagement took place. LOL. Kathy insisted Jimi was living with her at the time in Mayfair. There were very few photographs of Jimi and Monika together just the ones when she first met Jimi in Germany in January 1969. Even then there were a lot of other people in the photos as well. She even claimed that Jimi wrote her romantic letters but would never produce them when asked claiming they were far too personal. The photos that Monika took of Jimi in the garden of the Samarkand don’t seem to mean much in a romantic sense.
Hi Ivana,
Jimi immediately proposed that night haha
I’ve only seen about 4 photographs with both Jimi and Monika in it together and 2 of them are group photos. I believe those are the only ones known to exist.
The other photo is Jimi having a conversation with Monika and the one of Jimi being interviewed by a reporter with Monika off to his right with her head down.
None of the photos show Jimi and Monika being affectionate like he was with Kathy and his other girlfriends. Jimi and Monika looked like acquaintances in all the photos. Monika was never happy in any of them. She always had a serious and somber looking face.
Jimi looked serious in almost every Samarkand photo and there’s one of Monika turned to the side smoking and looking glum. I guess Jimi snapped that one. Not very happy for two people who were just “engaged”. Lol
Hi Jason, Monika appeared more like a fan and hanger-on than a girlfriend. The scarf Jimi was wearing in the Samarkand photos, tin foil hatters suggested was used to waterboard Jimi in their murder hoax. They claimed it was soaked with wine contradicting Bannister who said Jimi was naked when he arrived at the hospital. The ambulance officers found Jimi fully clothed on top of the bed and Dr Teare would have removed Jimi’s clothing to perform the autopsy. I’ve read that the people who prepared Jimi’s body dressed him in the clothing they had available before they sent him to Seattle for burial.
Hi Ivana,
That’s exactly what Monika was, she was just a hanger-on fan. She was a delusional groupie that fabricated a bunch of lies about Jimi and herself hoping she could gain some fame. But most importantly, she wanted to cover up for her neglect in Jimi’s death by pretending they were engaged so she wouldn’t be accused of anything. She then carried on that lie for the rest of her life.
I read that she used to hang around other popular musicians at the time in 1969 and even slept with Quincy Jones along with popular jazz players. So, she was a groupie and Kathy Etchingham eluded to that as well.
I remember “our friend” used the scarf claim for his “murder hoax” and later talked about Aleem’s asinine “sleeping on the couch” story he made up in his fictional book. Remember that? LOL
Fraud Bannister first said Jimi was ‘naked’. Later he changed his story saying “wine fully soaked and saturated Jimi’s clothes”. He must have learned about the ambulance men’s testimony of Jimi being fully clothed for him to change it. But both ambulance men never witnessed any wine at all soaking Jimi or his clothes. And neither did Dr. Bob Brown who was the first man at the hospital to see Jimi dead. So, three men debunked Fraud Bannister and the tin foil hatters “clothes soak in wine” claim.
Monika once said that they were back at the Samarkand and Jimi took a bath when he was writing his poem and presented it to her. She said he changed his clothes. So, that would mean Jimi wasn’t even wearing the same outfit when he died. So, that would debunk their claim of Jimi wearing the same clothes, but since Monika told so many falsehoods it’s hard to take anything she said seriously.
Hi Jason, That story that Monika and Jimi were back at the Samarkand blocks out the time they spent at Harvey’s place. It’s the same as the spaghetti meal Monika said she cooked. I doubt the story where Jimi took a bath and then wrote his poem. At some stage Jimi did write his poem but I don’t think it was when Monika said. She also claimed that they were talking and listening to music until 1.45 am when Jimi said he had to go to some people’s flat. As we know Jimi and Monika spent time at Harvey’s place and then Jimi went onto the party at Kameron’s place. Monika didn’t want others to know about the row she had with Jimi at Harvey’s so she conveniently left this out. It was all designed to paint a rosy picture of her ‘relationship’ with Jimi.
How can anyone forget the Aleem twins story LOL. They overheard Monika and Michael Jeffrey admitting to murdering Jimi but failed to tell the police but instead wrote about it in a book that no-one was likely to read. 😂 I’ve been reading about what Monika said at the inquest-talk about selective memory!
Hi Ivana,
If Monika was claiming Jimi took a bath in the evening when she cooked her imaginary spaghetti meal then that would block out their evening at Harvey’s since they were there the whole time. But Jimi did make some calls before they left to go out. Then they ran into Kathy and met Harvey. So, maybe that’s when he actually took a bath after his calls and wrote the poem.
Hi Jason, Jimi bought some clothes at the market where he ran into Kathy, I think after that Jimi went back to the Cumberland Hotel where he made the phone call to his lawyer about Michael Jeffrey and booked his ticket back to New York. This could have been where Jimi actually took a bath and a change of clothes. Monika and Jimi then ran into Harvey as they were driving along and then onto Kameron’s party after that. As we know Jimi returned to the Samarkand Hotel after many hours of being out and about.
When Jimi ran into Kathy at the market, Monika became angry and that started the night of her abusive behavior. Right, so Jimi could have taken the bath and changed clothes when he made the calls before going to Harvey’s and then to Kameron’s party after.
Monika tried to block out the entire evening at Harvey’s by claiming they stayed in all night at the flat for a “romantic evening”. If it wasn’t for Harvey finally making Monika’s incident public we would have never known.
I still say Jimi’s poem was just lyrics he was jotting down for a new song because he used to do that with his other songs so he wouldn’t forget the lyrics. He wrote “Crosstown Traffic” on a crumpled up piece of paper and wrote a lot of his songs on scraps or hotel stationary according to friends and Janie Hendrix. Plus there were lyrics to several songs that Jimi wrote on scratch paper that sold for big money at auctions, so that is a fact he did that. That’s why I believe the “poem” was just lyrics to a new song. It was no way intended for Monika as she lied again claiming it was their “life love story” or a suicide note as Eric Burdon falsely claimed.
I don’t believe the ‘poem’ was ever intended for Monika like you said nor do I think it was a suicide note like Eric Burdon suggested. Eric was foolish enough to say this on a tv show and I don’t think they ever forgave him for it. It’s just weird on Monika’s part to even think she had a true relationship with Jimi because I’m assuming he booked a ticket for one back to New York. His clothes were at the Cumberland Hotel, and he was still conducting business from there. The Samarkand Hotel was not a home he set up with Monika it was just a place he stayed at for a few days.
Jimi was booked at the Cumberland and he even extended his stay. Monika made plans in August to arrive in London in September. Nobody knew Jimi was over at the Samarkand with Monika.
Burdon quickly backtracked on the suicide claim after he was called out on it. Hoaxers try to use Burdon’s false claim with their “murder hoax”.
Jimi was supposed to head back to New York to finish recording the rest of the unfinished tracks for his upcoming album and then do a new tour. And Monika wouldn’t have went to New York with Jimi.
Hawaii!!!!
7/3O/7O!!!!!!!!
I’m not surprised by Monika’s reaction to Jimi showing interest in the other girls at Harvey’s place. Arriving with one woman and then carrying on with another is pretty poor behaviour. I really don’t think Jimi was capable of being faithful to any one woman, and Monika learnt this the hard way. I wonder how often Jimi thought about Kirsten Nefer after he met up with Monika. It would have been a lot smarter for Monika to have just walked away but I think she was so obsessed with a Jimi that she failed to see that Jimi had a succession of flings but really no monogamous relationships.
I’m impressed by the way Terry Slater always seemed to be at the right place at the right time. He observed that Jimi wasn’t in a particular good mood during a visit to the Samarkand Hotel and that there was no food whatsoever contradicting Monika’s romantic dinner for two. He was also on the scene on the morning Jimi died helping out with various things.
MOTIVE??!!!!
There was an interview with Monika from 1988 and somebody deleted it before I could post it.
Hi Jason, There’s the Selina Scott interview where Monika is talking about Jimi’s spirituality and his death but above all her book ‘The Inner World of Jimi Hendrix’. There’s also an ‘investigative’ type one but I’m not sure what it is called. Monika is wearing a white dress with a gold crucifix looking like some sort of spiritual entity herself. 😏
The two bottles of wine that Monika said she bought could be just as imaginary as the spaghetti meal she said she cooked. If Terry Slater observed that there was no food in the house I wonder what food the wine was supposed to have accompanied?
Hi Ivana,
This particular interview was from 1988 because Monika was showing her artwork she painted for the Electric Sun album Beyond The Astral Skies and she said she painted this three years ago. That album was released in 1985 so it was 1988. The Selina Scott interview was a few years later where she was lying again about Jimi and her getting “married”. That was another interview where Monika was allowed to lie the entire time. None of the interviewers ever pushed back or challenged her on her many contradictions.
All these claims Monika made were false and nobody that observed or witnessed the inside of the room saw any wine or empty bottles.
Hi Jason, Why anyone would bother interviewing Monika at all; she only knew Jimi for a very short amount of time. It’s because of the lies she told and her exaggerated relationship with Jimi that got her the publicity.
Hi Ivana,
Everything that’s written about Monika describes her as Jimi’s “girlfriend” or “fiancé” which is false. Since she was the last person to see Jimi alive, and was with him when he died, people wanted to interview her to get “the details”. But everything she said was a lie being pure fantasy.
Monika only spent about three days with Jimi in London, plus the early morning he died, and one night in 1969. From that, she claims to be his “girlfriend”, “fiancé”, and “knew everything about him”. What a joke. And not one person interviewing her ever challenged or questioned any of the nonsense she was pushing during the 70’s, 80’s, up to the mid 90’s. If they did, she would have crumbled and stayed out of the limelight. She craved the attention and wanted to be linked with Jimi forever. The media allowed her to peddle her lies and fantasy for years, and even after Monika was found out to be a liar, they still continue to print her same lies.
Hi Jason, Just crazy stuff! Kathy talked about Monika’s lies in a few interviews and Eric Burdon started to doubt what she said later on. He described Monika as a stalker and obsessed fan. How could someone like Monika who then married Uli Jon Roth be Jimi’s girlfriend or fiancé. I think it had a lot to do with Jimi’s high profile and fame and maybe Uli’s lesser popularity. Like you said she craved the limelight and peddled her fiancé status in order to get that attention. Strange how she rarely mentioned her marriage to Uli. It was all about Jimi.
Hi Ivana,
Uli took a backseat to Jimi and you’re right about Monika barely even mentioning their marriage, it was always about Jimi. Monika used her lies and her connection with Jimi just to further her career as a painter. Who would publish her paintings in magazines or interview her if she had no connection to Jimi? Nobody. So that’s why she milked it for everything she could get out of it.
Uli got mad at one reporter once for asking a question about Jimi and Monika. I’m also sure he didn’t like Monika’s obsession over Jimi during their marriage.
Yeah, Burdon said she was a stalker and so did others who knew of her.
Have you ever seen her album artwork?
Hi Jason, I’ve just seen her album artwork. Have you noticed how most of her paintings seem ‘out of this world’? If Monika was really Jimi’s fiancée then he would have had her by his side at all times. She claimed they were together for 18 months but that was exposed to be a lie. Jimi’s entourage had never met her before Jimi died. Monika would have realised that if she painted portraits of Jimi she would at least get some publicity unlike her other themes. Uli insisted she painted other subjects but I think this would have been a reaction to her obsession with Jimi through her paintings maybe even some jealousy there.
Well if Monika painted other “subjects” as Uli claimed, then she kept them well hidden because her only paintings she ever publicly produced only consisted of Jimi and the album artwork she painted. Sounds like Uli was just saying that out of jealousy like you said.
Yeah, all of her artwork was “spacey”, “cosmic”, and “outer space”. Her album covers for Uli’s band Electric Sun looked amateurish and was outdated for the 80’s. Those types of covers were produced in the early to mid 70’s. The band name and the album titles she painted for the covers didn’t look professional and distracted from the artwork.
And also, Jimi would have told all his friends if they were “engaged”. Nobody knew about it and all of Jimi’s friends denied Monika’s bogus “engagement” claim. They all said “Jimi would never marry her”. All this fantasy was only coming from Monika herself.
Hi Jason, I agree with the paintings looking amateurish and not professional. I don’t like them. Even her paintings of Jimi were cosmic. She claimed they were all originals but most of them were copied from posters and well known photos of Jimi she just gave them her cosmic touch. There’s a strange one of Monika looking into a lake or river and she sees Jimi’s reflection with the words I am you like they were soul mates with Jimi being her other half. Odd stuff. Kathy commented that Monika’s home in Seaford was covered with paintings of Jimi making her feel a bit uneasy.
Yeah, Monika copied one of Jimi’s most iconic photos of him playing guitar and she added a cosmic background along with Jupiter off to the right. Imagine how Uli felt when Monika was hanging all those paintings of Jimi around the house. She was totally obsessed with Jimi using her imagination to believe they were soulmates. I was looking at some old 70’s memorabilia and Monika was featured in quite a few mid 70’s European fan magazines mostly from Germany. It’s all written in German so idk what she was saying or lying about.
Hi Jason, The German press fell for her lies as well. At least Monika got the publicity she obviously craved for her paintings. Even though I’m not a fan of Sharon Lawrence she too picked up on that-it was goodbye Jimi hello Monika. Someone commented that Uli was just as ‘mystical’ as Monika that being one of the reasons they were drawn to each other. I wonder what happened to Monika’s paintings after she died. I read that Uli inherited Jimi’s guitar and that Monika was offered several millions for it.
I was going to get Philip Norman’s biography of Jimi ‘Wild Thing’ but was put off by the reviews. Apparently there’s nothing new added just information coming from other biographies, and some inaccurate stuff.
Hi Ivana,
I’m not sure what happened to all of Monika’s paintings but a few of them eneded up at art galleries and were either auctioned off or were on the market to be sold. One of her early non Hendrix paintings had a $20,000 price tag on it. A hefty price for amateur art work.
Hi Jason, Yes I saw the portrait of the woman dressed in the purple outfit. I think it’s only because of Monika’s brief association with Jimi that she got any publicity for her art work. She was also eager to befriend anyone who had the slightest connection to Jimi, like Curtis Knight who knew Jimi pre-Experience days, to rave about her art work. I read that no-one was really interested in publishing her ‘Inner World of Jimi Hendrix’ and she only managed to get someone on board decades later. I really don’t think Monika made any real money or profit from her paintings.
This was a Jimi Hendrix 45 rpm flexi disc single that came with Poster Press Magazine, a German music magazine from 1974. At the end of “Hey Joe”, Monika Dannemann talks about Jimi in German. She wasted no time in trying to put herself in the limelight to showcase her paintings. It was around this time she invented new phony claims and stories about her relationship with Jimi and his death a few years earlier. Monika is posing in a photo on the back of the picture sleeve. It’s a shame they gave her the publicity she craved.
https://www.discogs.com/Jimi-Hendrix-Hey-Joe/release/2085740
Hi Jason, Monika even managed to get herself on disc talking about Jimi. Hey Joe was recorded in the mid sixties when Monika hadn’t met Jimi at this time yet there she is on the back sleeve. What a joke! It’s just one of the ways Monika would be linked to Jimi for good.
I read that Monika met Jimi on the ‘astral plane’ every full moon. 😂Who can believe anything this woman says. Look at the people she accused of murdering Jimi yet it was her pills that were in Jimi’s system that caused his death. A friend of Monika said she was unwell, and there was also some criticism of her relatives for encouraging her fantasies. I suppose all she was really after was attention. Monika also had relationships/friendships with other black musicians but we heard very little about these. I think she targeted Jimi because of his high profile and popularity, knowing full well she would also benefit from his fame.
Monika was a groupie that wanted to associate with famous musicians so she could gain status. Nobody actually came out to discredit Monika’s false claims of her and Jimi being “engaged” or pressed her on her many contradictions of the morning Jimi died. They all waited until years and decades later to state she was mentally off and state that Jimi wouldn’t have been engaged to her. She was the first one to push bogus conspiracy theories of Jimi’s death in 1975 claiming he “was poisoned by the mafia” when it was her own pills that killed Jimi. No poison was found in Jimi’s autopsy except a lethal amount of Vesparax. A poor attempt of trying to escape the blame of Jimi’s death right when she was showcasing her early painting. Just a PR stunt.
I think Pat Hartley summed it up best when she said that Jimi was in love with his music. He was flattered by the attention he got from women but the music was all he was really interested in. Gerry Stickells said that Monika blew up her affair with Jimi making it sound more serious than it actually was. Jimi lived with Kathy Etchingham for a while but he wasn’t particularly ‘faithful’ to her either or to the other women he ‘dated’.
Jimi’s behaviour at Harvey’s place when he went into another room with another girl says it all really about the true extent of Monika’s ‘relationship’ with Jimi. If Monika and Jimi were really engaged then no way would Jimi have behaved this way. It seems as if Jimi was trying to tell Monika that he wasn’t interested in her at all, and that perhaps he didn’t care that much. Monika should have taken the hint and just walked away after she dropped him off at Kameron’s place afterwards. It was silly of her to repeatedly buzz the intercom trying to get Jimi’s attention again, and it would have been wiser for Jimi to have completely ignored her.
Jimi already had two girlfriends at the time and Monika lied and said “she was the only one”.
Monika was obsessed with Jimi and was extremely jealous of other girls, which was weird, since they were never engaged or in a relationship.
I agree, Jimi should have ignored her and not went back to the Samarkand that night. He still would have been alive.
Hi Jason, Jimi didn’t invite Monika to go to London and wait for him there like she claimed. She went there looking for Jimi hoping to run into him at some point. He wouldn’t have booked into the Cumberland Hotel with Kirsten Nefer if what she said was true; Jimi would have gone onto the Samarkand Hotel instead. Monika had very little or no significance for Jimi by the way he behaved at Harvey’s place right in front of her. She couldn’t stand that so concocted this whole false relationship with Jimi.
I’ve read that Leon Hendrix forgot the date when Jimi passed away, however he seems eager to participate in any interview that accuses his brother of being murdered with wine.
Leon dimissed those phony conspiracy theories before. Now he’s just trying to make money off Jimi any way he can since he was cut off from the family earnings.
Hi Ivana,
That’s exactly right.
Jimi booked himself at the Cumberland Hotel and even extended his stay there after Kirsten left London. Monika arrived on Tuesday at the Samarkand where she had her agent book the room for her. Jimi wouldn’t have extended his stay at the Cumberland if he had plans to stay with Monika. She concocted her fantasy relationship with Jimi as soon as he died.
Uli Jon Roth spoke about his former partner Monika Dannemann and the death of Jimi Hendrix. Uli managed to add to the Hendrix fiction by claiming “Monika told the truth”, “Hendrix died at the hospital”, “Hendrix was worked on for an hour at the hospital”, and was “resuscitated a couple of times”. The fact is, both ambulance men and a police officer confirmed Jimi Hendrix was already dead on the bed at the Samarkand when they arrived. All three doctors confirmed “Hendrix was dead for several hours” when he arrived at St. Mary Abbotts Hospital. No resuscitation could take place when Hendrix was already dead for several hours. Plus all the major media outlets in 1970 reported Hendrix as being “dead on arrival” which was confirmed by St. Mary Abbotts Hospital during their press briefing to the media that afternoon. Over the years, the actual event of Jimi’s death has been rewritten and fictionalized by certain individuals for their own personal gain of publicity or to profit monetarily off the tragic incident. Uli Jon Roth doesn’t help matters by pushing more phony tales in this so called interview. Seems like Uli was more interested in protecting Monika and her “legacy” than actually tell the truth about Jimi’s death. It also could be he is incredibly naive and was duped by the conniving manipulator, the late Monika Dannemann. She was a proven liar twice in court, yet he has the nerve to claim “Monika always told the truth” when her stories were exposed as lies and she contradicted herself many times. What all these liars don’t understand is that the actual events have been documented and recorded in history back on September 18, 1970 that details Jimi’s actual death and it never can be rewritten decades later for their invented tales of fiction. We were also able to have first hand accounts of the medical people involved to completely discredit Monika’s lies. One thing Uli did get right was that Jimi’s death was an accidental overdose of pills. He didn’t go down the road of phony “murder” allegations like Monika alluded to in 1975 when she lied about the “mafia poisoning” Jimi. It was her pills that she gave for Jimi to take. After some research I did, we all found out that Vesparax was not normal regular run of the mill sleeping pills. Vesparax was an anti psychotic medication prescribed to treat schizophrenia and bi polar disorders which had sleeping pill properties included into the medication. That’s what made Vesparax so potent and 1 to 1/2 pill was the prescribed amount. Uli gave an useless interview which only distorted the actual events of Jimi’s death with his own fiction in order to protect Monika Dannemann.
Uli Jon Roth on Jimi Hendrix
Uli Said, “Hendrix died in the hospital, Monika always told me the truth. Hendrix was just careless, he has so careless with things like that. I guess too much of an artist, he wasn’t grown up enough as you are when you are 27 years old. It was his own doing. he had these pills he couldn’t sleep, he thought these pills don’t work and he just popped too many, then in the end, he couldn’t breathe. The Doctors worked on him for an hour at the hospital and it was too late. And they resuscitated him a couple of times. But self inflicted I’m sorry. Monika didn’t say that but I say that because that is what I gather from the entire circumstances and yes maybe had he been in a different ambulance with more skilled people around maybe his death would not have happened. In fact probably would not have happened. But back then the ambulance people were not trained in England, they did not have any training, they were almost just drivers. I think it was just a chain of unfortunate circumstances. Had he lived I think he would have taken a sabbatical of a year cause he was a little burnt out at the end, he wanted to have a break. Learn how to write and read music. Write for orchestras, larger sections and he would have come back with something very powerful no doubt.”
Hi Jason, Uli will say anything to protect Monika. Jimi wasn’t living with her at the Samarkand Hotel so he would not have known where she kept her pills so it’s obvious Monika gave Jimi the pills like she told the German reporter soon after Jimi died.
To describe the ambulance attendants as just drivers is appalling. They did the best they could when confronted with Jimi covered in dry vomit and dead for a number of hours with no-one about at the Samarkand Hotel. No-one that morning wanted to be implicated in Jimi’s death. I wonder if the Vesparax Monika was taking contributed to her fantasies or whether she was taking it because of her ill health.
None of these people making the phony claims decades later was there at the Samarkand, so they have no clue what they are talking about. The ambulance men were there and they were only individuals that really told us the truth. Uli wants to dismiss them as just “drivers” but you can’t do much with a dead body. Uli never stated it was Monika’s pills that killed Jimi, she neglected to help him, and that Jimi was dead for hours when he was found by the ambulance men.
The Vesparax wasn’t helping Monika since she still had her wild fantasies. She was most likely on Vesparax due to her psychosis and vivid imagination. I looked up the disorder and this describes Monika to a T.
“Patients with schizophrenia or severe bi-polar disorder often report intense vivid imagery, extreme obsessions (‘pseudo-obsessions’), extreme guilt or worries, paranoia, and delusions of grandeur.
Hi Ivana,
That’s exactly right.
Plus Monika’s pills weren’t actually “sleeping pills”. They were an anti psychotic medication that had sleeping pill properties included in the medication.
Don’t forget Monika lied claiming the pills were “weak” when she knew how potent they were. Then she changed her story again claiming she “didn’t want Jimi taking them” and he took them “on his own without her knowledge”.
Hi Jason, I just find the whole of Monika’s story regarding Jimi as really strange. She arrived in London in August waiting for Jimi to arrive from his European tour. I read that Monika got together with Jimi only through Alvenia Bridges, and if Alvenia hadn’t stepped in then Monika would have probably not even seen Jimi. Monika then concocts a fantasy relationship with a world famous rock star who she really only spent a few days with. The truth is much more mundane with Monika being just another one of Jimi’s flings.
Hi Ivana,
And after only a few days they were “soulmates”, “engaged”, and in a “year long relationship” according to Monika lol.
Hi Ivana,
I was just looking around and came across this.
Grace Slick, formerly of the Jefferson Airplane and Starship drew a Jimi Hendrix sketch about a couple years ago and posted it on Facebook. People were leaving their comments below. Scroll down about 15 comments and see “who” you see posting a comment.
https://m.facebook.com/GraceSlickOfficial/posts/2486244478122750?locale2=de_DE
Hi Jason, Terrific sketch and great comments except for one from our friend. He never misses and opportunity to write this rubbish.
Nice photo of Mike Nesmith with Jimi. Mike Jeffrey thought it was a good idea to put Jimi on a tour with The Monkees. I’m glad to say Jimi didn’t last long as the teenybopper audience just wasn’t suitable for Jimi’s kind of music. 😀
Whenever there’s something posted about Jimi you can be sure “our friend” will be posting his usual b.s.
I’m glad nobody responded to his nonsense.
Somebody on another site said he is a cancer on the internet and I have to agree 100%.
Just had the misfortune of reading a few chapters of ‘Two Riders Were Approaching’, and there it is the imaginary murder by wine which never took place.The language and scenarios are so ‘earthy’ that I stopped reading. Jimi deserves better. 😏
Unfortunately, the imaginary “murder by wine” scenarios sells books and it’s why these fraudsters keep the myth going.
This murder hoax detracts from the good work done by Dr. Teare during the autopsy. The police officers also never thought to investigate all the copious amounts of red wine that Jimi’s body was supposedly soaked in. If all that wine was present then that’s the first thing that would have been questioned and recorded.
The hoaxers know that too, so that’s why “our friend” invented the phony “cover up” claim so he can keep his scam going.
2 police officers, 2 ambulance men, 2 coroner officers never saw any wine at all. Plus they took the blankets for evidence and only drugs were found in the dried vomit.
Bottles of spilled red wine would have been obvious to anybody there.
Alcohol would have been detected in the forensic analysis.
Fraud Bannister invented the wine hoax in 1992 and Tappy “The Fraud” Wright pushed the hoax even further to make it a “murder” to sell books. And from there authors include the wine hoax in their articles and books.
Hi Jason – refreshing to read your sensible and coherent posts in response to the endless conspiracy nonsense posted by our narcissist friend. I’m on a couple of Hendrix forums and have had several threads (not even about JH death) ruined by this fool. The descriptor ‘arsehole’ doesn’t even come close – seems to have it in for Brits too. In fairness I don’t think he has all his paddles in the water if you get my drift….
Hi Al,
Thanks for your message.
“The Hendrix hoaxer” has ruined many forums and sites with his endless conspiracy theory rants and ends up getting banned for it. He always attacks Brits and it’s more than obvious he has a few screws loose. Plus he has zero evidence to back up any of his phony claims. It’s always hearsay, innuendos, or his own made up nonsense which he claims as evidence. Not only that, he uses several fake names to spread his b.s. all over the internet and also to agree with himself (like he does on Amazon and on here) so it appears he has a following. He is nothing but a sad troll with a delusional obsession to push debunked conspiracy theories. The several meltdowns he had on here makes that perfectly clear.
Hi Jason, There wouldn’t have been a need to perform an autopsy if all that wine was present. The cause of death would have been obvious.
“Our friend” was really good at deception using a number of pseudonyms on different sites to make it look as if he had support for the nonsense he spews out. I’m pleased to say he has been banned from various sites.
Hi Ivana – Good !
Hi Ivana,
If all that wine was present there would have been reported documentation of wine in the room and an investigation would have been conducted by the authorities.
It’s true the ambulance men and the police had no idea the dead body was Jimi Hendrix, and even if nobody heard of him, an investigation still would have occurred regarding an unexpected death of a major rock musician.
Also, if all that wine was present on and inside the body of Jimi Hendrix (as the hoaxers try to claim) there would have been official hospital reports and documentation of all this wine recorded. St. Mary Abbots Hospital would have stated Hendrix died from an alcohol related death if that was the case.
The autopsy would have shown massive amounts of wine both on and inside the body of Jimi Hendrix during forensic analysis. No massive amounts of wine was ever detected proving the wine claims were all made up decades later. You can’t produce evidence in 2021 that never existed in 1970. That’s why these hoaxers will always fail.
Nothing about wine was ever mentioned or documented in 1970 because there wasn’t any wine. The fake wine claims started in 1992 courtesy of Fraud Bannister and then other frauds like Tappy Wright embellished the tale further to include the murder hoax.
All we get from these people are tales. Not one of them has any solid evidence to prove there was wine. The only people making these phony claims in interviews and books are obscure irrelevant opportunists looking to make money off Hendrix and to get a little publicity. Any relevant musician that was friends with Jimi laugh at these bogus conspiracy tales because they know it’s all a scam.
Hi Jason, Jimi’s blood alcohol level would have been much higher if he had been poured into him since he had been dead for a number of hours. The wine would have been absorbed into Jimi’s system.
Ivana makes an excellent point and the hoaxers are unable to argue against it which is why “our friend” cries “cover up” when he becomes cornered with this information.
All the imaginary wine that these hoaxers claim was poured into Hendrix would have absorbed inside his body, especially when it was claimed his entire body was filled full of wine. His alcohol level would have been astronomical with all that wine inside him. Yet, no “bottles of wine” was ever detected inside Jimi’s body during the autopsy.
Also, “our friend” claimed Hendrix was still alive to have phony “procedures” performed on him at the hospital. Fraud Bannister said Hendrix was “full of wine”. So, with both of these fake claims, all the wine would have had hours to absorb into Jimi’s system, especially his liver and stomach.
When the autopsy was performed by Dr. Teare, guess what he found in Jimi’s liver? He found a toxic level of barbiturates which came from the Vesparax. No large amount of alcohol was found absorbed in the liver or in the stomach which debunks this wine hoax.
Guess what Dr. Teare found inside Jimi’s stomach? Partially digested rice from the meal Jimi ate at Kameron’s party. If all that wine was inside Jimi’s stomach, as Fraud Bannister lied about when he claimed he sucked Jimi’s stomach dry, no rice should have been left behind. The evidence of rice in Jimi’s stomach also debunks the wine myth proving Fraud Bannister never performed any phony “procedures” on Jimi. Plus no documents exist of any “procedures”.
Both the evidence of rice and no detection of wine in the autopsy proves the wine myth is a hoax and was invented decades later. Otherwise, the autopsy results would have been completely different.
As I’ve been saying all along, science will always trump fake claims made by these fraudsters.
Hi Jason, Michael Jeffrey and Monika were supposedly murdering Jimi with wine and then they call the ambulance to try and save his life. You couldn’t ask for a dumber conspiracy theory.
LOL.
The whole conspiracy is a joke.
Hi Jason, Read Kill The Music:The Battle For Legacy. Exiles800 sounds exactly like “our friend”. We can add this to his numerous other pseudonyms.
Hi Ivana,
It certainly does sound like “our friend”. He must be using this name now to push his hoax on various sites. I was reading a forum post and it appears he was banned on some JFK political sites for promoting bogus conspiracy theories, using a fake name, and abusive behavior towards forum members.
As the years roll on, it’s no surprise to see disgraced convicted ex doctor Fraud Bannister change his story again in another interview. Here’s another bogus article that got traction in the media.
First of all, you can’t “try to save someone’s life” when they are already dead as Bannister admitted to. Second, the autopsy proves there was no wine. Third, he’s adding more nonsense to his phony story and now has changed Jimi’s death time to only a “half an hour” before arriving at the hospital.
Fraud Bannister now admits to there being barbiturates in Jimi’s system because there was analysis done at the hospital to determine Jimi’s drug overdose death. But the hoaxers “wine murder myth” is exposed as a fraud once again since the barbiturates wouldn’t have time to be absorbed into Jimi’s system if he “was murdered with wine” with wine and pills at the same time. Fraud Bannister said nothing about “wine” on September 18, 1970 because there wasn’t any wine. He made up the imaginary “wine” tale decades later in 1992.
“Australian doctor who tried to save music icon Jimi Hendrix’s life when he died 50 years ago recalls the fateful night the world lost a true legend”
12 September 20
An Australian doctor who tried to revive music icon Jimi Hendrix after choking on his own vomit recalls the fateful night the world lost the six-string trailblazer.
John Bannister was working as a surgical registrar at London’s St Mary Abbot’s Hospital when the American musician was rushed into the emergency ward on September 18, 1970.
The master guitarist of hits including “Purple Haze”, “Foxey Lady” and “All Along The Watchtower” had ‘obviously been dead for at least half an hour’ when he arrived covered in vomit, with red wine and barbiturates in his system according to the former doctor.
“We worked on him for about half an hour,” Bannister says ruefully. “But there was not a breath. His oesophagus was full of wine. There was wine everywhere. His lungs and stomach were absolutely full of wine. I have never seen so much wine. He had been dead for some time.”
The 27-year-old died of asphyxia, despite the efforts of Dr Bannister and the team for half an hour.
“He’d obviously been dead for at least half an hour,” Bannister, now 78 and living in Sydney, says.
‘I said, ”Who was it?”,’ he told Sydney Morning Herald. ‘They said, ”Jimi Hendrix.” Well, I didn’t know who Jimi Hendrix was. I had no idea.’
Dr Bannister recalled a slim woman, likely to be the girlfriend of Hendrix at the time – Monika Dannemann – being with the star during his final moments.
“She was ‘very upset’ as she watched the team attempt to revive Hendrix from the other side of the door”, he said.
Hi Jason, The only means of determining what Jimi died of was by performing an autopsy. How on earth would Bannister have known about the barbiturates overdose before Dr. Teare’s autopsy? Bannister also never mentioned the rice in Jimi’s stomach if he had flushed it out like he says. How exactly did Bannister determine that Jimi had been dead for only half an hour? His whole story just doesn’t add up.
I’ve been reading about Angie Burdon Eric Burdon’s ex-wife. After divorcing Eric she had a short fling with Jimi but like all of Jimi’s relationships this lead no-where. Angie eventually became addicted to drugs and sadly she was murdered by her partner in Australia. There have been quite a few programs and articles focusing on the issue of domestic violence, and the statistics are particularly frightening.
Kathy was right when she said that there were very few photos of Jimi and Monika together. There are just the ones taken back in 1969 and at the Samarkand Hotel in 1970. So much for their supposed engagement-18 months apart.
Hi Ivana,
There were about 5 photos with Jimi and Monika with 2 of them being group photos with other people. The other photos that exist was one of her sitting next to Jimi while he was being interviewed and another of him talking to her. No affectionate photos of them together.
Saturday 19 September 1970
Jimi Hendrix, the American pop singer and guitarist, died in London yesterday. He had been taken by ambulance from a flat in a private hotel in Notting Hill but was dead on arrival at St Mary Abbot’s Hospital, Kensington.
The cause of death was most probably an overdose of drugs, said Scotland Yard, but a post mortem examination would be carried out today.
Mr Hendrix, who was 27 years old, stayed in Britain after the Isle of Wight music festival, where he shared the top of the bill. He recently returned from a European tour which was cut short because of the illness of another member of the group and his increasing use of drugs.
Hendrix had been staying at the Cumberland Hotel in the West End and on Thursday asked to extend his stay to include that night, but a spokesman for the hotel said he was last seen there on Wednesday night, when he ordered a meal to be sent to his £17-a-day suite.
The flat where Hendrix was found dead was at the Hotel Samarkand and was booked in the name of Miss Monika Dannemann, a West German girl who spent most of yesterday afternoon in the hospital. Last night she was back at the flat, but under sedation. Mr Danny Hall, the manager of the hotel, said he did not know Mr Hendrix and the first he had known of his death was when police called and took a number of blankets which they had told him were for analysis. At the flat a coroner’s officer took possession of some sleeping tablets.
Miss Dannemann made her six-week booking through an agent in West Germany, he said, and she had arrived there some time in August.
Hi Jason, No doubt Jimi was in bad shape. Most likely Monika offered Jimi her Vesparax after he was unable to sleep after his night out. I still think Monika should have been questioned more about the amount Jimi took but she kept changing her story so she wouldn’t have been implicated in Jimi’s death.
I wonder who took the photos of Jimi and Monika in 1969 if it was a friend of hers or a journalist. I’m sure Monika was responsible for the close-up shots though. The photos say it all really about the actual amount of time they spent together despite Monika insisting it was 18 months.
Hi Ivana,
Yes, the authorities should have grilled Monika and should not have let her get away with her blatant contradictions and lies. Her story changes were totally obvious and they never questioned her on it. She also should have been called out on her lies that she was “engaged” to Jimi right from the get-go when everybody knew it wasn’t true. Monika was allowed to go on for 26 years of lying about her relationship with Jimi and the events of September 18, 1970.
Came across a note supposedly written by Jimi to Monika in Nona Hatay’s book ‘The Spirit Lives On’ Volume 1. I have my doubts that the note is genuine. It’s odd that she willingly produced this as well as the postcard but refused to show all the letters that Jimi supposedly wrote to her because they were far to personal according to Monika.
The “letters” were just part of her charade but Monika probably felt she needed to produce something like the postcard to squelch the critics who were questioning her claims of her “relationship” with Jimi. That postcard wasn’t proof of an “engagement” that Monika was lying about. If they were really engaged, Jimi would have told all of his closest friends about it. The fact he said nothing proves it was just a fantasy made up by Monika. It was a shame more people didn’t call Monika out on her lies right after Jimi died.
Alice Cooper reveals his first experience with drugs was with Jimi Hendrix
4th April 2021
Alice Cooper has revealed that his first experience using drugs was alongside Jimi Hendrix.
Speaking in a recent interview, the legendary rocker was asked to describe the first drug experience he ever had.
“Weed was the first drug, and it was [with] Jimi Hendrix,” he told Ralph Sutton and Big Jay Oakerson on The SDR Show. “I’m sitting there after the show. I went to see them. And we were just a little high school band. But they said, ‘Hey, come on up to the hotel room.’ And we were sitting on his bed, and Jimi goes, ‘Here, man,’ [and he passed me the joint]. And I went, ‘Okay.’
“And then he goes and puts a quarter in the bed – you know, the vibrating bed. There was, like, eight people sitting on the bed. And he goes, ‘We’re on a spaceship.’ And I went, ‘Okay.’
Hi Jason, I’m not sure whether Alice Kooper liked this experience or not.
Doesn’t sound like it lol
Jason, If we thought Monika’s memories were far fetched you’ve got to read Elantra Meredith’s account of the day Jimi died.
Ivana, Is there a link for that?
Hi Jason, The link is Hendrix.guide.pagesper-orange-fr/Kirstenlindholm. More made up rubbish.
Another no name person who claims to have “knowledge” of Jimi’s death but magically forgot about the entire incident until it was time to write a book decades later and then conveniently remembers having all these hazy memories come flooding back. She claims she was there to calm Monika down because she knew how to do Yoga. What a joke.
Hi Jason, There is nothing more relaxing than doing yoga with Jimi lying dead on the bed covered in vomit, and with all those others there at the Samarkand Hotel that morning. LOL
Sitting on the floor with all the “gallons of wine” soaked into the carpet haha
Excellent work guys and gals at pointing out how ludicrous the murder/wine fairytale is!
Bannister’s stupid story wasn’t about Hendrix at all. He said to 2 newspapers that the feet of the man he treated were sticking out about 10 inches off the end of the trolley! That means a man over 7 feet tall! Jimi was 5’11”. So Bannister MIGHT have been telling the truth about a different case altogether. So we can completely bury the “drowned in wine” nonsense.
Also, as you have mentioned above (and as confirmed by Dr. Michael D. Hunter in his 2016 autopsy review), if Jimi had been water-boarded with wine there would have been traces of struggle on his skin (none at all) and his lungs would have absorbed an enourmous quantity of alcohol into the bloodstream (low levels were in Jimi’s blood).
One thing that has been overlooked for decades is the fact that a 6-hour old body would be blue and stiff as a board and thus not admitted to Casualty! Never in a million years! If a body shows advanced rigor mortis and lividity (definitely evident after two hours, let alone six!) it is evident that brain death happened hours ago.
The FACT that Jimi was RUSHED to hospital and RUSHED to the resuscitation room is the absolute proof that he wasn’t long-dead. After all, Dr. Seifert said “When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead.”
Hi The Bat, Welcome on board, Spot on about the low levels of alcohol in Jimi’s blood. Unfortunately Bannister and tin foil hatters have added to the misinformation surrounding Jimi’s death.
Hey, I’d like to contact the editors/webmasters here to make a subject suggestion. Anyone know how I can contact them?
Yes we can completely bury Fraud Bannister’s phony “drowned in wine” story since Jimi Hendrix was never “drowned in wine”.
Jimi Hendrix was confirmed dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbotts Hospital and that was reported in every media outlet on September 18, 1970. So, there was no “life still left in him” as Dr. Seifert later tried to claim decades later.
The DOA hospital report was also confirmed by Ambulance men Reginald Jones and John Saua and also a police officer who later stated Jimi Hendrix was dead on the bed covered in dry vomit when they all arrived on the scene. For the vomit to be dry, that means Hendrix was dead for a while. Neither ambulance man or the police mentioned anything about “wine” on the bed or on Hendrix. And neither did Dr. Bob Brown. Also, all 3 doctors are on the record declaring Hendrix was already dead when he arrived at the hospital.
Dr. Bob Brown was the first doctor to witness Hendrix and Brown confirmed Hendrix was already dead. Fraud Bannister said Hendrix was already developing signs of rigor mortis and was blue. Dr. Seifert stated Hendrix was dead and the monitor was flat. Fraud Bannister admitted any resuscitation attempt was a formality. So, there was no reason to “rush” an already dead Hendrix for “resuscitation attempts”.
Unfortunately, Siefert changed his original statement, but when you compile all the testimony together, you have 6 different men stating Hendrix was already dead. That’s overwhelming evidence and debunks all these conspiracy b.s. tales of “imaginary wine and phony procedures” that never happened since no hospital report exists of any of these bogus decades later claims.
Here is more evidence that more than confirms Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival because this is over 50 years old documented evidence. It cannot be changed 50+ years later with bogus conspiracy theories to fit a false narrative.
Reginald Jones (Ambulance Man): “We felt for any pulse between his shoulders, pinched his earlobes and nose, showed a light in his eyes, but there was no response at all. I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. When we got him to the hospital, full lights and sirens, we had to clean the ambulance out, it was really a mess, his bowels and bladder, all that goes when you’re dead.”
John Saua (Ambulance Man): “We got down to the flat and there was nobody but the body on the bed. We knew it was hopeless. There was no pulse, no respiration. I was in the back with Jimi, Reg Jones drove. When we moved him the gasses were gurgling. You get that when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant.”
Ian Smith (Police Officer): “We went to a basement flat at Landsdowne Crescent. The ambulance men were there, but Jimi was dead. It wasn’t very pleasant. They had to take some of the bedding and wrapped it around his body as there was a lot of mess. There was really nothing they could do for him. I watched them put him in the ambulance and go off.”
Dr. Siefert: “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead.”
Dr. Brown: “I was working there when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead. I knew who he was but there was nothing I could do for him. He had been dead for some hours.”
Dr. Bannister: “On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality. He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of someone who had been dead for some time.”
Les Perrin (Hendrix public relations manager): “Well, all I know is that Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival”.
So, we now have 7 men who all at one point confirmed Jimi Hendrix was already dead BEFORE he was brought to the hospital. This is irrefutable evidence that cannot be changed with new stories later on or new made up conspiracies.
Both ambulance men confirmed Hendrix was already dead on the bed. They both described in graphic detail of his bowels and bladder “going” with gurgling gasses from being dead.
Ian Smith a police officer confirmed Hendrix was dead.
Dr. Bob Brown confirmed Hendrix dead as soon as he was brought in and was dead for hours.
Dr. Seifert stated Hendrix was worked on “for a few minutes” and he was already dead.
Fraud Bannister admitted any resuscitation attempt was a formality and Hendrix was dead for hours.
And finally Les Perrin, Jimi’s P.R. manager confirmed to the media on September 18, 1970 that Jimi was “certified dead on arrival”. A hospital doesn’t certify a person to be dead on arrival if they are “still alive”. They certainly don’t work on a dead body that was already certified to be dead. That totally confirms Jimi Hendrix was already dead when he was brought to St. Mary Abbots Hospital and any phony claims of half hour to hour “phony procedures” never happened, which is also why no documents exist of any said “phony procedures”.
Even though Dr. Seifert changed his story decades later, all 7 men confirmed at one point Hendrix was a DOA and no long resuscitation attempts ever happened. Les Perrin confirmed that nearly 51 years ago, but through the decades fraudsters and conspiracy theorists attempted to alter the events for their own personal gain. Like I always say, you can never refute or change documented evidence or real life events that already took place.
Hi Jason, No way would Jimi have survived swallowing all those barbiturates. The fact that he was fully dressed on top of the bed is testimony to this. Jimi would have been feeling drowsy soon after ingesting the Vesparax. The fact that there was rice in Jimi’s stomach when Dr. Teare performed the autopsy means that no procedures were attempted on Jimi when he was brought into casualty like Dr. Bannister claims.apart from pounding Jimi’s chest a few times. Monika should have been questioned more as to why there was such a delay in calling the ambulance.
I don’t think the inquest was thorough enough. Dr. Thurston would have had all the details at hand as to when and how Jimi died.Monika gave just enough information away as to not implicate herself in Jimi’s death.Monika knew full well the potency of the Vesparax Jimi took but failed to stop him. A few more people, like the ambulance officers and doctors could have been invited to the inquest to give their side of the story.
Hi Ivana,
Jimi’s autopsy showed there was lethal levels of barbiturates in his liver and Dr. Rufus Crompton said even if Jimi didn’t choke on his vomit he still would have died from the toxic barbiturate level in his system.
Glad you mentioned the rice found in Jimi’s stomach during the autopsy. The fact a partially digested rice meal was still found in Jimi’s stomach debunks the phony “procedure” and “wine drowning” claim. The rice wouldn’t have been present if there was a “procedure” beforehand to remove “wine” from his stomach. That’s why Fraud Bannister’s claim is a lie and why the hoaxers will always be debunked with their “phony procedure” claim.
I agree that Monika should have been grilled about her contradictions and inconsistencies with her stories. She wouldn’t have been able to lie for decades about that morning if that was the case.
The fact is Monika knew the pills she gave Jimi made him sick which quickly killed him and she didn’t want to be implicated in his death. So, she wasted time and concocted a phony story hoping she would be absolved of any wrongdoing.
That was the real tragedy in all of this. The inquest was done too quickly and Monika was allowed to give inconsistent statements about September 18, 1970.
Since there was no foul play involved and the autopsy confirmed a lethal barbiturate overdose, that seems all they were concerned about back then to conclude that it was an overdose of drugs. Nobody had any idea that decades later in January 1992, Fraud Bannister would make up a ridiculous claim about a “wine drowning” and other fraudsters would come out of the woodwork to make bogus murder charges for their absurd hoax just to sell books.
If all that information was fully detailed these fraudsters never would’ve had the opportunity to degrade Jimi’s death and his legacy. They couldn’t have smeared the names of these deceased famous medical professionals and individuals associated with Jimi.
The ambulance crew weren’t doctors, so their accounts aren’t 100% relaible (like the CPR admission is). They didn’t say that the vomit on the bed was dry, they were talking about the vomit in his airways. This doesn’t mean that Jimi had been dead for hours either. If had vomited but lay there in difficulty for a while, his breathing would had caused any vomit in his larynx/pharynx to dry.
Anyway, John Suau told Dennis Care that the comments that had been published in the early books were incorrect. Suau also told Care that Jimi gave his last breath in the ambulance on arrival.
It is clear that Hendrix hadn’t been dead for hours at all – BECAUSE he was rushed into Casualty. The doctor who looked at Jimi in the ambulance deduced that there was a chance of resuscitation. Long-dead bodies display rigor mortis and lividity and Jimi would have been no exception if long-dead.
Again, the fact that he was admitted for CPR is the absolute proof that he hadn’t been dead for very long. For the doctors, he was clinically dead (not breathing) but perhaps not quite brain dead. Blue stiffs don’t get taken in for resuscitation.
Sorry Bat, you’re posting debunked propaganda and total nonsense.
John Saua and Reginald Jones gave the most reliable testimony of anyone associated with Jimi’s death on 9/18/70. Their testimony debunks the phony “imaginary wine claim” and the “Hendrix still being alive claim”.
Jimi Hendrix was unresponsive to any of the vital tests performed by Saua and Jones at the Samarkand. Hendrix had no pulse and no heartbeat. He was not “still breathing”. He was dead.
The ambulance crew were trained to know what a dead body is. Also, officer Ian Smith would know what a dead body is as a trained officer who dealt in those situations. He confirmed Hendrix was dead as well.
All 3 doctors confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival. The official hospital medical report declared Hendrix a DOA. You can’t change the actual event nearly 51 years later attempting to claim Hendrix “was still alive”.
Total nonsense. The dry vomit in Hendrix’s airways was completely blocked which would not allow him to breathe. He was already dead and suffocated on his own vomit.
Reginald Jones specifically stated that the vomit on Hendrix was all dry. He confirmed Hendrix was dead for a long time.
Reginald Jones (Ambulance Man): “We tried to revive him, but we couldn’t. The vomit was all dried. He’d been lying there for a long time. There was no heartbeat.”
Hendrix wasn’t “admitted for CPR”. He was hooked up to the monitor and it was flat, determining he was dead. Siefert pounded his heart twice and that was it.
7 men stated Hendrix was dead on arrival at the hospital. That’s clear and overwhelming evidence against decades later conspiracy theories
Jimi’s P.R. manager told the media on 9/18/70 Hendrix was declared dead on arrival and that is what the official hospital report states.
Fraud Bannister said Hendrix was “cold and blue”. He described the inside of his mouth and mucous membranes as being black. That’s rigor mortis and signs of being dead for hours. Plus Dr. Bob Brown stated Hendrix was dead for hours. Fraud Bannister and Siefert said “resuscitation” was a formality.
New York Times September 19, 1970: “The ambulance rushed to the hotel on Landsdowne Crescent, in London’s Nottinghill Gate district, and took Hendrix to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital, where he was pronounced dead on arrival at 11:45 a.m., London time.”
A hospital doesn’t declare an individual “dead on arrival” if they are still alive.
Jimi Hendrix was certified dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbots Hospital on 9/18/70.
The official death listed for Hendrix is suffocation: “The cause of death was clearly inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication.”
The dry vomit found in Hendrix’s airways by Reginald Jones and John Saua clearly confirmed “the inhalation of vomit” that killed Jimi Hendrix.
Jason, Ivana, you are relying on Monika’s claim that Jimi took 9 tablets when in fact, we have no proof of that at all. We can’t possibly know how many pills were in that box on Friday morning. She had been at the flat for a week already with her prescribed tablets, so obviously she needed them and was using them in all probability.
For all we know, the box could have been half empty! Don’t forget that Monika told a Bild journalist AND Kathy/Mitch/Noel that SHE gave Jimi the tablets and when they didn’t appear to work, she gave him “some more”. This could mean one tablet, then a couple more – enough to put anyone in a critical situation (especially with a brown bomber already ingested and a few drinks, joints,…AND possible a case of the flu… AND sleep apnea ( which Jimi seemed to suffer from according to previous girlfriends).
Peter Goddard (journalist): “A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”.
David Tune – The Daily Mirror, 19th September 1970: “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yeserday on the way to the hospital”
So, statements on the morning of the 18th give us clues that Jimi was close to death or died in that ambulance.
Yes, Jimi was a flatliner when brought in but one has to understand the difference between Clinical Death and Biological (brain) Death. In clinical death, one can be unresponsive, not breathing, no heartbeat but NOT brain dead. This is when CPR is carried out and it is why Jimi was rushed to the resuscitation room. They assessed that there could be a chance of getting him back as THIS is the absolute proof that Jim wasn’t a 6 hour dead blue stiff. If he had been dead for hours, he would’ve exhibited advanced rigor mortis and lividity. He obviously didn’t at all because CPR was performed!
Then comes the arguments of the tiny traces of rice in the stomach argument. One must understand that food digestion is slowed by the consumption of alcohol, amphetamines, barbiturates, cannabis and sleep! Jimi ticked all those boxes, so it is no mystery that Jimi had the remains of a half-digested meal in his stomach at death and those TRACES of rice were discovered through a microscope (don’t think there was a chicken chow mein still there).
If you can get your head round to the fact that Jimi died either just before the ambulance crew arrived or in the ambulance (because we have the proof that he wasn’t long-dead) then the whole thing becomes clearer.
Monika claimed she was wearing a similar jade necklace to Jimi when they met in Germany but I can’t see it anywhere in those photos. It’s as if Monika is saying that she and Jimi were fated to meet that day. I’ve read that Monika had a liking for black musicians so I think she planned to meet Jimi that day.
She claimed in interviews it was “fate” that allowed them to meet.
Yeah I never saw the necklace either and the only known photos of Monika at that time are of her wearing black and there’s no visible necklace in any of them.
The couple of only known photos of Monika and Jimi are usually cropped making it appear they were posing together, but if you see the full original photo, it’s actually a group photo with other people sitting at a small portable table.
The other photo that exists is Jimi speaking to Monika, which is on the same night, because Jimi is wearing the same shirt and Monika is wearing the same black shirt.
Another photo is Jimi being interviewed by a reporter and Monika is seated to his right looking away from Jimi. Again, Monika is wearing black with no necklace and it might be the same outfit. It also appears to be the same colorful shirt Jimi was wearing. So, it appears those 3 photos were taken all on the same day.
The photo of Monika outside the Samarkand shows her looking sullen smoking a cigarette and no necklace is visible.
No affectionate photos of them exist….so much for the “two of them madly in love and engaged”….lol
Here we go again!. Jimi was flatline when brought into the hospital. The only procedure performed on him was pounding Jimi’s chest as a mere formality in order to establish time of death and complete the necessary paperwork. It’s ridiculous to suggest that anyone can survive taking 18 times the recommended dosage of a barbiturate. Tin foil hatters have used the Jimi was strong and therefore could take anything line to push their phony murder claims.
Yep, here we go again with more tin foil hat conspiracies!
The cause of Jimi’s death was “inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intoxication”. Jimi was found dead by two ambulance men Reginald Jones and John Saua with dry vomit completely blocking his airways. That was the inhalation of vomit that is documented on Jimi’s death certificate. Their testimony is perfectly in line with Thurston’s official listed cause of death.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital on the afternoon of 9/18/70 conducted a media press conference with hospital officials including Dr. Bob Brown as a spokesman for the medical staff. The hospital declared Jimi Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival and the cause of death was a suspected drug overdose with a pending autopsy to confirm the actual cause. The autopsy determined that a lethal amount of barbiturates caused Hendrix to die.
At no time during the hospital media press conference on 9/18/70 did they state anything about “massive amounts of wine”, a “wine drowning”, Hendrix was “still breathing and alive” when he reached the hospital, or Hendrix had “life saving procedures” performed on him to save his life. Nothing like that ever happened. If it did happen, the hospital and Dr. Bob Brown would have stated that during the press conference. All this nonsense was made up by tin foil hat conspiracy theorists and hoaxers decades later. And none of these made up conspiracies are documented on any medical report because it never happened.
The tin foil hat conspiracy theorists make up the bogus tale that “Jimi Hendrix had a famous tolerance to drugs”, therefore he couldn’t die from a drug overdose. That bogus claim is laughable and absurd because the level of barbiturates found in Jimi’s system was .7 well above the .5 toxic level. .7 is lethal. Nobody in the world could survive that amount of toxicity in their system.
The other one, is the equally absurd “Jimi wasn’t dead when he reached hospital” conspiracy. 2 ambulance men, a cop, 3 doctors, Jimi’s P.R. man, the hospital, and every single media outlet in the world said Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival. Yet, the tin foil hatters want to change the actual event of Jimi Hendrix’s death nearly 51 years later so they can promote their fantasy tales of fiction with “Jimi still being alive” to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital. What a joke.
Hi Jason, I’ve been reading about the amount of time it takes for a meal to pass from the stomach to the small intestine-2-4 hours. Jimi still had rice in his stomach when Dr. Teare’s performed the autopsy so it’s fair to say that Jimi died back at the Samarkand Hotel soon after taking the Vesparax otherwise Jimi’s stomach would have been empty.
Ivana: read my comment above. It was a microscope that found only fine traces of rice in his stomach. I did some research on this and amphetamines, barbiturates, alcohol, marijuana AND sleep all slow down the digestive process. The “rice in the stomach” is another thing that has been blown out of proportion and misinterpreted. It’s no proof that Jimi died soon after taking the 3? 4? 6? 9? pills.
Hi Ivana,
People at Kameron’s party stated that Jimi ate the rice in the 11 o’ clock hour closer to midnight.
Dr. Crompton estimated Jimi died no later than 4 am due to the rice in Jimi’s stomach that was documented in the autopsy report.
The massive amount of barbiturates would have slowed down his digestive system.
So, the rice eaten around midnight and the estimated 4 am death time puts that right at 4 hours.
Jimi arrived back at the Samarkand with Monika a little after 3 and probably took the pills not too long after in the 3 o’ clock hour.
It wouldn’t take long to overdose on that massive amount of barbiturates.
Jason: Jimi arrived at Kameron’s party after 1 a.m. and not at 11 p.m. on the 17th.
Monika to The Daily Sketch (29 September 1970): “About 1.10 a.m. he told me he had to go to see some people. I dropped him off at a flat and then picked him up again just after three o’clock.”
We can’t say at what exact time Jimi ate the meal. It could have been at 2:30!
When the police did their little investigation on the afternoon of the 18th, they found out that the arguing between Jimi and Monika continued and at one point, Jimi went outside to calm down.
P.C. Smith: “From what we could gather, Jimi and the girl had had a bit of an argument and he’d stormed off to cool down. When he came back, he took a sleeping pill and went to bed. Then she went out, and when she came back, he’d been sick and she couldn’t wake him”.
Jimi had been drinking, smoking and had taken a brown bomber, so his rate of digestion would have already been slowed. If he took a sleeping pill at say… 4 to 5 a.m. (?) that and the fact that he slept would have further slowed the digestion process. Had Compton taken all this into account? Of course not. So it’s no surprise that a meal in a semi liquid state was found in Jimi’s stomach and UNDER THE MICROSCOPE revealed TRACES of rice.
Why is this important? – because I simply do not believe that Stickells and Barrett hung around at the appartment for hours with Jimi in difficulty or dead on the bed. If you believe that, you’re on the same wavelength as the looney conspiracy theorists.
In the morning, only Terry Slater arrived on the scene to assist Monika and then bury the drugs in the rear garden. The famous appartment “clean-up” was in the afternoon, before the police arrived to interview Monika.
I’m having log-in difficulties and my posts. I’ll try again.
Ivana, you are relying on Monika’s claim that Jimi took 9 tablets when in fact, we have no proof of that at all. We can’t possibly know how many pills were in that box on Friday morning. She had been at the flat for a week already with her prescribed tablets, so obviously she needed them and was using them in all probability.
For all we know, the box could have been half empty! Don’t forget that Monika told a Bild journalist AND Kathy/Mitch/Noel that SHE gave Jimi the tablets and when they didn’t appear to work, she gave him “some more”. This could mean one tablet, then a couple more – enough to put anyone in a critical situation (especially with a brown bomber already ingested and a few drinks, joints,…AND possible a case of the flu… AND sleep apnea ( which Jimi seemed to suffer from according to previous girlfriends).
Peter Goddard (journalist): “A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”.
David Tune – The Daily Mirror, 19th September 1970: “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yeserday on the way to the hospital”
So, statements on the morning of the 18th give us clues that Jimi was close to death or died in that ambulance.
Yes, Jimi was a flatliner when brought in but one has to understand the difference between Clinical Death and Biological (brain) Death. In clinical death, one can be unresponsive, not breathing, no heartbeat but NOT brain dead. This is when CPR is carried out and it is why Jimi was rushed to the resuscitation room. They assessed that there could be a chance of getting him back as THIS is the absolute proof that Jim wasn’t a 6 hour dead blue stiff. If he had been dead for hours, he would’ve exhibited advanced rigor mortis and lividity. He obviously didn’t at all because CPR was performed!
Then comes the arguments of the tiny traces of rice in the stomach argument. One must understand that food digestion is slowed by the consumption of alcohol, amphetamines, barbiturates, cannabis and sleep! Jimi ticked all those boxes, so it is no mystery that Jimi had the remains of a half-digested meal in his stomach at death and those TRACES of rice were discovered through a microscope (don’t think there was a chicken chow mein still there).
If you can get your head round to the fact that Jimi died either just before the ambulance crew arrived or in the ambulance (because we have the proof that he wasn’t long-dead) then the whole thing becomes clearer.
The partially digested meal was found in Jimi’s stomach during the autopsy with the traces of rice making up the supplementary report. The presence of rice is not significant because it shows that those procedures Bannister talked about did not happen, and if Jimi was alive when brought into emergency his stomach would have been empty. CPR is performed only if death is immediate and within 20 minutes. The ambulance attendants would have performed CPR on Jimi in the back of the ambulance if he had died in the ambulance on the way to hospital. I think it’s silly to believe that anyone can survive taking a toxic level of any barbiturates. The Hendrix death story has gone through a few changes over the years, and it’s starting to sound like some fantastical story with brave men trying to save someone in distress and beyond help.
Same old same old. More conspiracies with zero evidence because there is none.
THE BAT says: Jason, Ivana, you are relying on Monika’s claim that Jimi took 9 tablets when in fact, we have no proof of that at all. We can’t possibly know how many pills were in that box on Friday morning. She had been at the flat for a week already with her prescribed tablets, so obviously she needed them and was using them in all probability.
JASON says: No, I am not relying on Monika’s claim. Jimi’s autopsy revealed he had lethal barbiturate intoxication which poisoned his system. That clearly comes from taking several pills. In fact, the number of pills doesn’t even matter. Jimi took a lethal overdose and he was found dead at the flat. Those are the facts. All you’re doing is trying to inject conspiracy theories.
THE BAT says: For all we know, the box could have been half empty! Don’t forget that Monika told a Bild journalist AND Kathy/Mitch/Noel that SHE gave Jimi the tablets and when they didn’t appear to work, she gave him “some more”. This could mean one tablet, then a couple more – enough to put anyone in a critical situation (especially with a brown bomber already ingested and a few drinks, joints,…AND possible a case of the flu… AND sleep apnea ( which Jimi seemed to suffer from according to previous girlfriends).
JASON says: Again, what you’re proposing is irrelevant. Jimi took more pills than the prescribed amount allows and suffered a lethal overdose which killed him. The autopsy concluded that.
THE BAT says: Peter Goddard (journalist): “A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”.
David Tune – The Daily Mirror, 19th September 1970: “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yeserday on the way to the hospital”
So, statements on the morning of the 18th give us clues that Jimi was close to death or died in that ambulance.
JASON says: These claims were proven false. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival on 9/18/70. That’s the official hospital report etched in history. 3 doctors, 2 ambulance men, a cop, and Jimi’s P.R. man all confirmed Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival.
THE BAT says: Yes, Jimi was a flatliner when brought in but one has to understand the difference between Clinical Death and Biological (brain) Death. In clinical death, one can be unresponsive, not breathing, no heartbeat but NOT brain dead. This is when CPR is carried out and it is why Jimi was rushed to the resuscitation room. They assessed that there could be a chance of getting him back as THIS is the absolute proof that Jim wasn’t a 6 hour dead blue stiff. If he had been dead for hours, he would’ve exhibited advanced rigor mortis and lividity. He obviously didn’t at all because CPR was performed!
Then comes the arguments of the tiny traces of rice in the stomach argument. One must understand that food digestion is slowed by the consumption of alcohol, amphetamines, barbiturates, cannabis and sleep! Jimi ticked all those boxes, so it is no mystery that Jimi had the remains of a half-digested meal in his stomach at death and those TRACES of rice were discovered through a microscope (don’t think there was a chicken chow mein still there).
JASON says: This is total b.s. you’re making up to fit your false narrative. Jimi was found dead at the Samarkand and pronounced dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital. When your heart has stopped for several hours with black mucous membranes, you are brain dead. You have zero evidence for your nonsensical conspiracies.
THE BAT says: If you can get your head round to the fact that Jimi died either just before the ambulance crew arrived or in the ambulance (because we have the proof that he wasn’t long-dead) then the whole thing becomes clearer.
JASON says: The condition of Jimi’s body proves your theory wrong. You were not a tending doctor to Jimi Hendrix on 9/18/70 at St. Mary Abbots Hospital. All 3 doctors that witnessed the condition of Jimi’s body stated Jimi Hendrix was dead for hours when he arrived. Both ambulance men and a cop confirmed Hendrix dead at the Samarkand. That’s official documented evidence and you don’t have any.
THE BAT says: Jason: Jimi arrived at Kameron’s party after 1 a.m. and not at 11 p.m. on the 17th. Monika to The Daily Sketch (29 September 1970): “About 1.10 a.m. he told me he had to go to see some people. I dropped him off at a flat and then picked him up again just after three o’clock.”
JASON says: The Bat is relying on Monika Dannemann’s false claims for his conspiracies. Monika Dannemann is a proven liar and her claims have been refuted.
Stella Douglas and others present that night confirmed Jimi Hendrix was at the party in the 11 o’ clock hour. I believe the word of several party guests over confirmed liar Monika Dannemann any day.
THE BAT says: We can’t say at what exact time Jimi ate the meal. It could have been at 2:30! When the police did their little investigation on the afternoon of the 18th, they found out that the arguing between Jimi and Monika continued and at one point, Jimi went outside to calm down.
JASON says: Yes, we can say about what time Jimi ate his final meal. Stella Douglas and other have stated Jimi ate rice sometime in the 11′ o clock hour closer to midnight.
THE BAT says: P.C. Smith: “From what we could gather, Jimi and the girl had had a bit of an argument and he’d stormed off to cool down. When he came back, he took a sleeping pill and went to bed. Then she went out, and when she came back, he’d been sick and she couldn’t wake him”.
Jimi had been drinking, smoking and had taken a brown bomber, so his rate of digestion would have already been slowed. If he took a sleeping pill at say… 4 to 5 a.m. (?) that and the fact that he slept would have further slowed the digestion process. Had Compton taken all this into account? Of course not. So it’s no surprise that a meal in a semi liquid state was found in Jimi’s stomach and UNDER THE MICROSCOPE revealed TRACES of rice.
Why is this important? – because I simply do not believe that Stickells and Barrett hung around at the appartment for hours with Jimi in difficulty or dead on the bed. If you believe that, you’re on the same wavelength as the looney conspiracy theorists.
In the morning, only Terry Slater arrived on the scene to assist Monika and then bury the drugs in the rear garden. The famous appartment “clean-up” was in the afternoon, before the police arrived to interview Monika.
JASON says: All these “stories” and claims from these people do not matter which is why I take them with a grain of salt. The only thing that matters are the official facts, science, and the official documented evidence that cannot be refuted.
Jimi Hendrix was found dead at the Samarkand by two ambulance men Reginald Jones and John Saua along with Officer Ian Smith. Jimi was unresponsive to any of the vital tests and had no heartbeat. He was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital where he was hooked up to the monitor and it was flat proving he was dead. The condition of Jimi’s body showed he had been dead for hours. The autopsy concluded Jimi Hendrix died from a lethal barbiturate overdose which caused him to suffocate on his own vomit. The dry vomit found in Jimi’s throat by both ambulance men was the evidence of the suffocation. The autopsy concluded Jimi had rice still left in his stomach proving his death was in the early morning hours.
These are the facts which cannot be refuted. Anything else is useless conspiracies with zero evidence because there is no evidence for those bogus tales of fiction.
Hi Jason, I’m already exhausted. Two things stick out for in this story, the fact that a Jimi was fully clothed on top of the bed means that the barbiturates he took started to work very soon after and that the dosage was high enough. The rice found in Jimi’s stomach during the autopsy also signifies that the digestion process was slowed because Jimi was either in a coma on his way to dying or dead. The ambulance was called at 11.am so I really don’t think anyone would have survived that long. The safe dosage for Vesparax is half a tablet so for anyone to go beyond that is asking for trouble.
Hi Ivana,
It seems you can never get away from these phony Hendrix conspiracies.
Excellent points you made.
The recommended dosage for Vesparax was designed to work quickly with the 3 combination drugs inside the pill. The massive overdose that Jimi took would start to work immediately making the effects even more intense, which is why he was knocked out on his back still fully dressed.
Being that he was in a comatose state from the overdose, he wasn’t awake when he was vomiting which made him choke to death on it being flat on his back. The fact that the vomit in his throat was dry proved he was dead on the bed for a long time.
Barbiturates slows down the system and the fact the rice still wasn’t digested indicates death early in the morning hours.
The only way Jimi could have possibly survived is if he received immediate medical attention right after swallowing the pills. As each minute went by the more damage was done. Even if he didn’t suffocate on his own vomit, the damage to his body from the amount of barbiturates he took would have eventually killed him. The .7 lethal level of barbiturates in his liver proved that. Nobody can survive lethal barbiturate poisoning.
Jason/Ivana, I’m totally with you that there was no murder, no wine in the lungs, no conspiracy. Bannister was describing the case of a 7 foot tall body and not Hendrix. So we can rule out everything he said. A fraudster or someone who didn’t research enough before spouting his nonsense.
I repeat (and this is nothing to do with a “conspiracy” at all) that Jimi was admitted to Casualty, which would have beenn impossible if he had been dead for hours. Hospitals follow a strict code with arrivals which is why they have triage. If Jimi had been dead for hours, he would have displayed rigor mortis and lividity very clearly. It would be a medical first if he didn’t! The fact that he was rushed to the resuscitation room of Casualty is the absolute proof that he hadn’t been dead for very long. I don’t know why you can’t understand that.
If you think that Stickells and Barrett hung around and cleaned the flat with a dead Jimi there (or even a struggling Jimi), then it is you that is still believing in a conspiracy.
Also, you don’t seem to understand the fact that someone can be clinically dead before being biologically dead (look it up). The ambulance crew obviously found JImi who had passed away within the hour before their arrival (although John Suau told Dennis Care that Jimi’s last breath was on arrival at St. Mary Abbott’s).
You are also relying on the accounts of the ambulancemen, when we know that they aren’t 100% reliable as they came via Dolores Cullen, who was a total stalking, slandering fake (see Kathy’s book).
Yes, Monika’s accounts were all over the place but she was simply getting tangled trying to cover up the fact that she had given Jimi too many sleeping pills.
Questions:
1. How long do you think Jimi was lying dead at The Samarkand?
2. When do you think Barrett and Stickells arrived at the flat?
THE BAT says: It’s no proof that Jimi died soon after taking the 3? 4? 6? 9? pills.
JASON says: Yes, the proof that Jimi died soon after taking an overdose of Vesparax has already been documented for nearly 51 years.
The first, is the condition of Jimi’s body when he arrived at the hospital which showed he had been dead for hours.
The second, is the results found in Jimi’s autopsy which registered a .7 lethal level of barbiturates in his liver. You can only obtain that level by taking well over the prescribed amount of pills. A lethal overdose will result in death rather quickly.
Sorry Bat, you can’t argue against medical science and the human body trying to replace it with fiction.
Our new friend is starting to sound more and more like our old friend. LOL
LOL. I noticed that from the first message. Same conspiracy too about Jimi not being dead to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital.
All these people who want to promote conspiracies have one thing in common. They take real events that actually happened and try to tell you that it didn’t really happen inserting their conspiracy in its place. Then they create their own events that never happened while attempting to discredit and diminish the most important evidence that destroys their fairy tale claim. Case in point with Jimi’s final meal and his early morning death.
Partygoers confirmed Jimi ate his final rice meal close to 12 midnight. But “The Bat” wants to change the time Jimi ate to 2:30 am to fit his false narrative so he can claim Jimi wasn’t dead until later. But as we will see below, that bogus claim will be easily proven wrong.
The same as with the rice found in Jimi’s stomach by Dr. Teare. The Bat wants to diminish that important evidence by claiming the rice was “traces” to push a phony conspiracy of “Jimi being alive at the hospital”.
THE BAT says: We can’t say at what exact time Jimi ate the meal. It could have been at 2:30!
THE BAT says: Then comes the arguments of the tiny traces of rice in the stomach argument. One must understand that food digestion is slowed by the consumption of alcohol, amphetamines, barbiturates, cannabis and sleep! Jimi ticked all those boxes, so it is no mystery that Jimi had the remains of a half-digested meal in his stomach at death and those TRACES of rice were discovered through a microscope (don’t think there was a chicken chow mein still there).
JASON says: So, “The Bat” wants to claim that Jimi didn’t eat until 2:30 and was still alive at 12 noon to receive CPR at the hospital. That’s almost 10 hours later after Jimi would have finished his meal. There wouldn’t have been any rice found in Jimi’s stomach 10 hours later. Also, a person who took a massive overdose of barbiturates would not still be alive several hours later without immediate medical attention. So, this phony claim has been easily debunked.
“The Bat” is attempting to diminish that important evidence of rice found inside Jimi’s stomach by claiming it was “traces” of rice which is a lie. The fact of the matter is, Dr. Teare documented that he found “whole grains of rice” in Jimi’s stomach, which indicates that the rice had not been digested yet putting his death around 4 am.
Again, facts and evidence matter. Not phony made up recreated events. That’s why these conspiracies will always be debunked and proven to be a total joke.
These people have turned Jimi Hendrix into a mythical Superman who can withstand anything. According to them, Jimi can take any massive amounts of barbiturates and still not overdose and die. Jimi can have no heartbeat, no pulse, no oxygen but still have a living brain to receive CPR but then die right after. These fairy tales are a total joke and it’s amazing how far these people will go to promote this nonsense.
THE BAT says: Yes, Jimi was a flatliner when brought in but one has to understand the difference between Clinical Death and Biological (brain) Death. In clinical death, one can be unresponsive, not breathing, no heartbeat but NOT brain dead. This is when CPR is carried out and it is why Jimi was rushed to the resuscitation room. They assessed that there could be a chance of getting him back as THIS is the absolute proof that Jim wasn’t a 6 hour dead blue stiff. If he had been dead for hours, he would’ve exhibited advanced rigor mortis and lividity. He obviously didn’t at all because CPR was performed!
JASON says: LOL. This is absolutely hilarious. 2 ambulance men, a cop, 3 doctors all confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival. Plus St. Mary Abbots Hospital documented Jimi Hendrix as dead on arrival. Not to mention the monitor clearly showed Hendrix was dead well after he was checked for vitals at the hotel which showed he was already dead. But “The Bat” wants to claim Hendrix was “still alive” with a phony Hendrix conspiracy Superman tale.
Everything is documented that Jimi Hendrix was already dead. He had no pulse and no heartbeat back at the Samarkand when the ambulance men checked for his vitals. Even his bowels emptied inside the ambulance which indicates death.
“The Bat” wants you to believe that Jimi Hendrix, with no pulse or heartbeat, laying dead on the hotel bed in dry vomit, “still was alive with brain activity” when he reached the hospital that also showed he was dead when he was hooked up to the monitor. A brain can’t stay alive that long with no heartbeat, pulse, and oxygen. That’s why these asinine claims are a total farce and are easily debunked.
Who assessed “there could be a chance of getting Jimi back”? Dr. Bob Brown clearly stated Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and there was nothing that could be done for him. Officer Ian Smith back at the Samarkand said Jimi was dead and nothing could be done for him. Hell, even Fraud Bannister had to admit it.
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – Fraud Bannister
Jimi Hendrix had a “resuscitation attempt” as a formality which is required by law to establish a time of death. Jimi Hendrix was not given CPR as an attempt to save his life because he was already long dead as told by several medical professionals. The medium sized meal of whole grain rice left inside Jimi’s stomach (which wasn’t “traces” as “The Bat” falsely claimed) proved Jimi was already dead for several hours.
Fraud Bannister described Jimi’s mucous membranes being black and Dr. Bob Brown clearly stated Jimi Hendrix was dead for hours because of the condition his body was in. Does that sound like a man who was “still alive” with brain activity all ready to have CPR performed on him?
Reginald Jones (Ambulance Man): “When we got him to the hospital, full lights and sirens, we had to clean the ambulance out, it was really a mess, his bowels and bladder, all that goes when you’re dead.”
Ian Smith (Police Officer): “We went to a basement flat at Landsdowne Crescent. The ambulance men were there, but Jimi was dead. It wasn’t very pleasant. They had to take some of the bedding and wrapped it around his body as there was a lot of mess. There was really nothing they could do for him. I watched them put him in the ambulance and go off.”
Dr. Siefert: “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes – He was dead.”
Dr. Brown: “I was working there when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead. I knew who he was but there was nothing I could do for him. He had been dead for some hours.”
The Bat wants you to ignore all this documented evidence and believe his own made up fairy tale that Jimi was “still alive” to get CPR treatments. Hilarious!
Hi Jason, The doctors didn’t know anything about who the patient was or the circumstances of his death. There was no-one at the Samarkand Hotel when the ambulance arrived to take Jimi to the hospital and it was only after Gerry Stickells identified the body that the doctors could put a name to their patient. I think Monika would have disappeared if the hotel room wasn’t registered in her name.
Hi Ivana,
Monika would have fled for sure if she didn’t book the room herself so she couldn’t have been tied to Jimi’s death.
After St. Mary Abbots Hospital learned Jimi Hendrix was a famous rock star, it was their responsibility to give an accurate press conference to the media detailing what they knew about Jimi’s death. They stated nothing about phony CPR procedures and imaginary wine because those are decades later made up stories. They stated Jimi died from a drug overdose and was dead on arrival and they needed the autopsy to confirm the rest.
We can all agree that Jimi died as a result of taking an overdose of barbiturates. The amount of rice in Jimi’s stomach is significant because at some point digestion stopped as there was a partially digested meal of rice still remaining in Jimi’s stomach we hadn’t passed into his intestine. So a some point Jimi was alive as some of the rice was found in the intestines. If Jimi had been alive his stomach would have been empty with the digestive process still going on. Jimi couldn’t possibly have been alive all those hours after taking the Vesparax. The reason he was “rushed” into casualty was because the ambulance attendants cannot pronounce someone dead this is left up to the doctors. This tallies with Jimi’s chest being pounded a few times in order to prounce him dead. Gerry Stickells made his way to the Cumberland Hotel when informed that Jimi was in trouble that morning as he had no idea about Monika or the Samarkand Hotel. Jimi would not have possibly survived all those hours without oxygen physically or mentally as he suffocated on his own vomit due to the toxicity of the Vesparax.
THE BAT says: I repeat (and this is nothing to do with a “conspiracy” at all) that Jimi was admitted to Casualty, which would have beenn impossible if he had been dead for hours. Hospitals follow a strict code with arrivals which is why they have triage. If Jimi had been dead for hours, he would have displayed rigor mortis and lividity very clearly. It would be a medical first if he didn’t! The fact that he was rushed to the resuscitation room of Casualty is the absolute proof that he hadn’t been dead for very long. I don’t know why you can’t understand that.
JASON says: Yes, it is a conspiracy theory when you are making up false claims that never happened trying to recreate Hendrix history.
Yes, it is a conspiracy theory when Jimi Hendrix was confirmed dead on arrival by the same hospital that you claim Jimi had “CPR” done on him which never happened.
I don’t know why you can’t understand the statements from 7 different men who all have said Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival. All of these men were medical professionals except for Jimi’s P.R. man and a cop who was a professional at identifying dead bodies.
Fraud Bannister said Hendrix was “dead on admission”. Dr. Bob Brown clearly stated “Jimi Hendrix was dead when he was brought in and there was nothing he could do for him”. That means Jimi was dead and no CPR was performed. Dr. Brown’s statement was corroborated by Reginald Jones, John Saua, Ian Smith, Dr. Seifert, and Fraud Bannister. That’s 6 professionals who all have said Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival but you have Jimi “still being alive at the hospital to receive CPR”. That’s a conspiracy theory.
You’re completely ignoring the fact, which I posted several times now, where Fraud Bannister stated “Jimi’s mucous membranes were black as well as the inside of his mouth” which is rigor mortis. Dr. Bob Brown backed up that statement when he clearly said “Jimi had been dead for hours”. Even Reginald Jones and John Saua said Hendrix was dead for a long time. How did they know that? They knew that because the vomit was dry as well as the condition of his body. Also, Jimi never could have lived for 10 hours after taking a massive barbiturate overdose without getting immediate medical attention. And finally, the evidence of a medium rice meal still left inside Jimi’s stomach proves he died hours earlier. If Jimi died later, as you claim, no rice would have been detected.
THE BAT says: If you think that Stickells and Barrett hung around and cleaned the flat with a dead Jimi there (or even a struggling Jimi), then it is you that is still believing in a conspiracy.
JASON says: Why would I think that? I’ve never spoken about Stickells or Barrett. You keep bringing them up.
THE BAT says: Also, you don’t seem to understand the fact that someone can be clinically dead before being biologically dead (look it up). The ambulance crew obviously found JImi who had passed away within the hour before their arrival (although John Suau told Dennis Care that Jimi’s last breath was on arrival at St. Mary Abbott’s).
JASON says: Jimi Hendrix was already dead at the Samarkand. He didn’t magically come back to life for a few minutes to take a breath with no heartbeat and completely blocked airways to get “CPR” and then die again on the table. That is a conspiracy.
Jimi wasn’t breathing at the hotel when the ambulance men found him. His airways were completely blocked with dry vomit. So, he wasn’t “taking his last breath” en route to the hospital or getting CPR with no heartbeat.
Jimi’s official death certificate clearly states death due to “inhalation of vomit”. It doesn’t say death at hospital during “CPR attempt”.
THE BAT says: You are also relying on the accounts of the ambulancemen, when we know that they aren’t 100% reliable as they came via Dolores Cullen, who was a total stalking, slandering fake (see Kathy’s book).
JASON says: Dr. Bob Brown’s account came via Dr. Bob Brown himself and he said Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival which totally backs up what both ambulance men said. Plus Dr. Brown was the first doctor to witness Jimi on his arrival.
Kathy met with Reginald Jones and he told her Jimi was dead at the Samarkand with the vomit being all dried. Kathy also believes Dr. Rufus Crompton’s estimated 4 am death time due to the rice in found in Jimi’s stomach. So yes, Mr. Jones was very reliable.
THE BAT says: Yes, Monika’s accounts were all over the place but she was simply getting tangled trying to cover up the fact that she had given Jimi too many sleeping pills.
Questions:
1. How long do you think Jimi was lying dead at The Samarkand?
2. When do you think Barrett and Stickells arrived at the flat?
JASON says: Yes, I agree with you about Monika.
Answers:
1. Based on Jimi’s autopsy results, Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated Jimi died no later than 4 am and that is documented medical evidence.
2. It doesn’t really matter when Stickells and Barrett arrived at the flat. All these people told contradictory stories. The only thing that’s factual is the documented medical evidence proving Hendrix died from a drug overdose at the flat.
Question for The Bat:
1. How can a man (Jimi Hendrix) “take a breath” with no pulse, no heartbeat, and completely blocked airways from dry vomit?
2. How can a man (Jimi Hendrix) receive “CPR” when the monitor was flat showing he was dead and nothing more could be done for him as told by the attending hospital doctors?
3. Why would hospital officials including Dr. Bob Brown state to the media that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and nothing was done for him if they were giving him CPR as you claim? Wouldn’t they have said they attempted CPR if that was the case?
4. How can 6 men who all said Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival be wrong (according to you) when these men saw Jimi dead both before and after his hospital arrival?
Hi Jason, Good work here. This story has become unnecessarily complicated when it doesn’t need to be. Jimi died as a result of taking an overdose of a powerful drug. He subsequently vomited because of the high dosage,and then chocking on his own vomit unable to clear his mouth because he was in a coma on his way to dying. This CPR amounted to a few thumps of the chest in order to establish time of death nothing more, and it certainly wasn’t performed to bring Jimi back from the dead.
Ivana, you are wrong when you say that “the CPR amounted to a few thumps of the chest”. Dr. Seifert in a filmed interview (23 Feb. 2000): “”To say that he [Jimi] was dead when they [Reginald Jones and John Suau] got to the [Samarkand] hotel is probably incorrect. When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead.”
Don’t forget that ambulancemen ALSO tried to revive Jimi (their own limited CPR attempts):
JONES: John ran up and radioed, got the aspirator too…See we just have to keep working on him and we did, my shirt was wringing wet. ‘Cos the ambulances in them days, weren’t equipped like they are now,”
JONES again: ” I went back to the ambulance for an aspirator. We tried to revive him but we couldn’t.” (he said John Suau went to get it before).
SUAU: “”Well I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out (with an aspirator).”
In 1995, Suau was interviewed for the BBC Radio One’s “Wink Of An Eye” broadcast and he said: “There’s a standard procedure especially for someone who’s unconscious. They travel on their side. All the equipment is there at his head if you need to do resuscitation, anything like that, it’s all there ready to use.”
So you see, you have your facts all wrong I’m afraid.
You MUST also know that these proceedures are NEVER performed on a 6 hour old dead body. You do know that 6 hour old dead bodies are as stiff as a door, blue and blotched with livor mortis (look it up). Medical staff, even ambulancemen NEVER attempt resuscitation on a body exhibiting those signs.
This changes little though. It was an accidental death, no question. I’m only pointing out that it is impossible for Jimi to have been dead for hours BECAUSE they tried to revive him (which they would never even attempt if he had been dead for 6 hours).
Hi Ivana,
The reason the story has become complicated is because certain individuals want to make it complicated on purpose by pushing bogus conspiracies.
Unfortunately, the entire Jimi Hendrix case was handled poorly and the players involved made contradictions which conspiracy theorists seized upon to push their false claims.
The fact of the matter is, Jimi Hendrix took more pills than the prescribed amount which killed him. The overdose he took put him in a comatose state which affected his breathing, and being that he was on his back when he became sick, he was unable to turn over when he started vomiting. When the vomit came up it had nowhere to go except to suffocate him. That’s all documented on Jimi’s death certificate, plus we have the testimony of both ambulance attendants detailing dry vomit completely blocking his airways which confirmed the inhalation and suffocation.
The actual time of Jimi’s exact death is not known as it is only estimated. In fact, it doesn’t really matter what time Jimi actually died because he was already dead when the ambulance men found him and nothing could be done for him as he was declared a DOA. But then these conspiracy theorists attempt to dispute the facts with nothing but baseless claims making Jimi’s death a total farce and a conspiracy.
Jason said:
The reason the story has become complicated is because certain individuals want to make it complicated on purpose by pushing bogus conspiracies.
REPLY: I’m not pushing any bogus “conspiracy” at all. That needs at least 2 people involved. THIS is all about Monika and nobody else.
Jason said:
Unfortunately, the entire Jimi Hendrix case was handled poorly and the players involved made contradictions which conspiracy theorists seized upon to push their false claims.
REPLY: Exactly. People like Tappy Wright, Buster,…
Jason said:
The fact of the matter is, Jimi Hendrix took more pills than the prescribed amount which killed him. The overdose he took put him in a comatose state which affected his breathing, and being that he was on his back when he became sick, he was unable to turn over when he started vomiting. When the vomit came up it had nowhere to go except to suffocate him. That’s all documented on Jimi’s death certificate, plus we have the testimony of both ambulance attendants detailing dry vomit completely blocking his airways which confirmed the inhalation and suffocation.
REPLY: Correct but the dry vomit in Jimi’s Larynx isn’t proof that he’d been dead for hours. He was in a coma and still breathing for hours. His breath would have dried any vomit still lining the throat, etc. No mention of dry vomit on him or on the bed.
Jason said:
In fact, it doesn’t really matter what time Jimi actually died because he was already dead when the ambulance men found him and nothing could be done for him as he was declared a DOA. But then these conspiracy theorists attempt to dispute the facts with nothing but baseless claims making Jimi’s death a total farce and a conspiracy.
REPLY: The ambulancemen saw no sign of rigor mortis (which is only visible after 2 hours), so their protocol compelled them to do immediate CPR and rush Jimi to hospital.
That wouldn’t have been done if he’d been dead for 6 to 8 hours as you ludicrously maintain.
Finally, don’t think that Jimi was pronounced brain dead on arrival, he wasn’t! Brain dead blues stiffs (6 to 8 hours dead) go directly to the morgue. They saw that Jimi wasn’t in that state so they proceeded with standard resuscitation proceedures.
Jason, you still don’t understand what I’m pointing out.
You seem to think that “dead” means completely gone, brain dead. It doesn’t. Someone cold, unresponsive, not breathing and no heartbeat can be revived if they have been in that state for well under 15 minutes. It is however difficult to say if a patient has been in that state for 10 minutes or 60 minutes because the IRREFUTABLE signs of brain death/biological death (rigor mortis and livor mortis) don’t become evident until after 90 minutes to 2 hours.
After 6 hours, Jimi would have been as stiff as a coffee table, blotched and blue. Unquestionably beyond any possible help. However, you are saying that this wasn’t the case! You are believing a medical impossibility.
The ambulancemen couldn’t assertain how long Jimi had been in that state but because he wasn’t yet a stiff, they attempted to revive him (it’s in their accounts). Note that the carried Jimi out in a special chair, which means he was limp and not stiff with rigor mortis (which he would have been if dead for hours!).
The FACT is that we know that Jimi was triaged to the Resuscitation Room (Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown said that). So the team could plainly see that Jimi wasn’t stiff and blotchy (which would rule out any consideration that he could be resuscitated). So we have the PROOF that he hadn’t been dead for hours (unless you think Dr. Frankenstein was on duty like the looney conspiracy theorist do).
Dry vomit? Reginald Jones was talking about the vomit in Jimi’s throat not all over the bed. Suau said Jimi was in a “pool” of vomit. If Jimi had vomited and been in difficulty for some time, his breath could have dried to vomit lining his larynx.
Rice in the stomach? You seem to think a chicken chow mein was still there but it was semi liquid which UNDER A MICROSCOPE: “The sample of stomach contents when examined microscopically was found to contain starch granules. Whole rice grains could be discerned”
So the meal had been practicall entirely broken down but greatly slowed by the various consumptions that I outlined. One or two harder, less-cooked grains were still there.
In answer to your questions:
1. How can a man (Jimi Hendrix) “take a breath” with no pulse, no heartbeat, and completely blocked airways from dry vomit?
Answer: choking on vomit can clear vomit away and leave a channel still to breath. Jimi was in difficulty and struggling to…breath.
2. How can a man (Jimi Hendrix) receive “CPR” when the monitor was flat showing he was dead and nothing more could be done for him as told by the attending hospital doctors?
Answer: The ambulancemen tried to revive Jimi! The doctors RUSHED him to the RESUSCITATION ROOM. Seifert in a filmed interview: “”When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead.”
So we have PROOF that CPR was performed for about 10 minutes. Satisfied?
3. Why would hospital officials including Dr. Bob Brown state to the media that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and nothing was done for him if they were giving him CPR as you claim? Wouldn’t they have said they attempted CPR if that was the case?
Brown only walked with the trolley for “a few steps” as it was being rushed to the EMERGENCY SECTION! I s that done with 6-hour dead stiffs? Never!
Brown: “”I just saw him, checked him – there was nothing to be done. But they kept going; they were moving. I just came along with the trolley, walked with it for a few steps and on it went. But saw that there was nothing to be done. They were going the right way to the emergency department but there was nothing to be done there either. “He was then taken from – instead of into the casualty department, into the emergency section”.
4. How can 6 men who all said Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival be wrong (according to you) when these men saw Jimi dead both before and after his hospital arrival?
Again, as I said above, one must understand how doctors and staff determine death and how long someone has been dead and perhaps only clinically dead (research it).
Here again, we have all the same old tactics that all conspiracy theorists use. They diminish documented facts and insert their own conspiracies instead. They take the words of what people said, and change what they said, adding their own phony interpretation to it. Then they use words like “could have” when they have zero evidence to back it up with.
Documented medical evidence and documented official accounts confirm Jimi Hendrix was officially dead at the Samarkand Hotel before he was brought to St. Mary Abbots Hospital. He had no pulse and no heartbeat. His airways were completely blocked with dry vomit which killed him. Jimi Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival on his official hospital record by St. Mary Abbots Hospital and nobody can change that documented record.
THE BAT says: Jason, you still don’t understand what I’m pointing out.
You seem to think that “dead” means completely gone, brain dead. It doesn’t. Someone cold, unresponsive, not breathing and no heartbeat can be revived if they have been in that state for well under 15 minutes. It is however difficult to say if a patient has been in that state for 10 minutes or 60 minutes because the IRREFUTABLE signs of brain death/biological death (rigor mortis and livor mortis) don’t become evident until after 90 minutes to 2 hours.
JASON says: The conspiracy you’re trying to promote is ridiculous.
Jimi Hendrix was completely gone before the ambulance men found him dead on the bed. Jimi’s tongue fell back in his throat which means he was dead.
The ambulance men attempted to revive Jimi inside the room and they were unable to. When Jimi reached the hospital, he was pronounced dead on arrival and the monitor officially proved Jimi was dead. Nothing more was done for him because it was too late. All this nonsense is being made up by you trying to switch times and to claim he was not brain dead. These are nothing but your own personal conspiracies which has been debunked by all the real documented evidence.
THE BAT says: After 6 hours, Jimi would have been as stiff as a coffee table, blotched and blue. Unquestionably beyond any possible help. However, you are saying that this wasn’t the case! You are believing a medical impossibility.
JASON says: All 3 doctors, 2 ambulance men, and a cop confirmed Jimi was already dead and beyond help. You are peddling fairy tales.
THE BAT says: The ambulancemen couldn’t assertain how long Jimi had been in that state but because he wasn’t yet a stiff, they attempted to revive him (it’s in their accounts). Note that the carried Jimi out in a special chair, which means he was limp and not stiff with rigor mortis (which he would have been if dead for hours!).
The FACT is that we know that Jimi was triaged to the Resuscitation Room (Dr. Seifert and Dr. Brown said that). So the team could plainly see that Jimi wasn’t stiff and blotchy (which would rule out any consideration that he could be resuscitated). So we have the PROOF that he hadn’t been dead for hours (unless you think Dr. Frankenstein was on duty like the looney conspiracy theorist do).
JASON says: The ambulance men and the cop confirmed Jimi was already dead at the scene. St. Mary Abbots Hospital made that confirmation official declaring Hendrix dead on arrival.
THE BAT says: Dry vomit? Reginald Jones was talking about the vomit in Jimi’s throat not all over the bed. Suau said Jimi was in a “pool” of vomit. If Jimi had vomited and been in difficulty for some time, his breath could have dried to vomit lining his larynx. Rice in the stomach? You seem to think a chicken chow mein was still there but it was semi liquid which UNDER A MICROSCOPE: “The sample of stomach contents when examined microscopically was found to contain starch granules. Whole rice grains could be discerned”
JASON says: Like every good conspiracy theorist does, they take the words of what a person says adding their own phony interpretation to it claiming “that’s what they really meant to say”.
Jones said both the vomit on the pillow and in Jimi’s throat was dry.
Reginald Jones (Ambulance Man): “We tried to revive him, but we couldn’t. The vomit was all dried. He’d been lying there for a long time. There was no heartbeat.”
“Could have” is just another way of saying that this is total b.s. and it never happened.
All medical evidence and documented accounts refute your recreation of events.
THE BAT says: So the meal had been practically entirely broken down but greatly slowed by the various consumptions that I outlined. One or two harder, less-cooked grains were still there.
JASON says: LOL. This is total b.s.
I guess The Bat was assisting Dr. Teare during the autopsy to document these imaginary findings of these “less cooked grains” inside Jimi’s stomach. LOL
THE BAT says: choking on vomit can clear vomit away and leave a channel still to breath. Jimi was in difficulty and struggling to…breath.
JASON says: This is total b.s.
Jimi was not “struggling to breathe” when the ambulance men found him dead on the bed. His airways were completely blocked with dry vomit because he suffocated and that’s documented on his death certificate.
THE BAT says: The ambulancemen tried to revive Jimi! The doctors RUSHED him to the RESUSCITATION ROOM. Seifert in a filmed interview: “”When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead.”
So we have PROOF that CPR was performed for about 10 minutes. Satisfied?
JASON says: This is not proof of anything. Seifert contradicted his previous statement but we have 5 other men including the official St. Mary Abbots Hospital report declaring Hendrix dead on arrival.
“Jimi was rushed into the [resuscitation] room. He was put on a monitor, but it [ECG trace] was flat. I pounded his heart [CPR] a couple of times, but there was no point, he was dead”. – Dr. Martin Siefert
So there is your “CPR”. Siefert pounded Jimi’s heart a couple of times to make it official and that was it because he was already long dead.
THE BAT says: Brown only walked with the trolley for “a few steps” as it was being rushed to the EMERGENCY SECTION! I s that done with 6-hour dead stiffs? Never!
Brown: “”I just saw him, checked him – there was nothing to be done. But they kept going; they were moving. I just came along with the trolley, walked with it for a few steps and on it went. But saw that there was nothing to be done. They were going the right way to the emergency department but there was nothing to be done there either. “He was then taken from – instead of into the casualty department, into the emergency section”.
JASON says: Brown witnessed Hendrix dead on the trolley. He’s telling you “there was nothing to be done” because Jimi was long dead. And you have him getting emergency CPR lol.
Fraud Bannister said any “resuscitation attempt was a formality”. That’s required by law.
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – Fraud Bannister
THE BAT says: Again, as I said above, one must understand how doctors and staff determine death and how long someone has been dead and perhaps only clinically dead (research it).
JASON says: The doctors and staff at St. Mary Abbots Hospital determined Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival which is why they confirmed that in their media press conference and why it’s documented on Jimi’s official hospital record. Research it.
Hi Ivana,
An autopsy is the most accurate method to determine a cause of death, and in other cases, an estimated time of death if the person had a meal. The undigested rice found inside Jimi’s stomach is more than enough evidence to establish an estimated time of death which Dr. Crompton concluded was no later than 4 am. Ridiculous how some people want to argue against medical science with made up stories that make absolutely no sense. Pushing Jimi’s death to 10 hours later is absurd. Jimi’s stomach would have been completely empty at that point if he was “still alive to take a breath”. Jimi’s stomach had undigested rice proving he died early in the morning. Like I always say, you can’t argue against medical science and the human body.
Hi Jason, What I’ve been reading from our new friend is beyond belief. I looked up barbiturates which are used to induce sleep and decrease anxiety. Even a slight overdose causes coma and death, and we know Jimi was way over the safe limit of half a tablet.
Hi Ivana,
Exactly, and our new friend wants to pretend Jimi was still alive for several hours later after taking a massive overdose when he had no heartbeat and was dead, but not “officially dead”, to then receive “life saving CPR”.
These people have turned Jimi’s tragic death into a total farce with these absurdities.
THE BAT: You are wrong when you say that “the CPR amounted to a few thumps of the chest”. Dr. Seifert in a filmed interview (23 Feb. 2000): “”To say that he [Jimi] was dead when they [Reginald Jones and John Suau] got to the [Samarkand] hotel is probably incorrect. When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead.”
Don’t forget that ambulancemen ALSO tried to revive Jimi (their own limited CPR attempts):
JASON says: Wrong? You are wrong. Dr. Siefert stated he pounded Hendrix’s heart only a couple of times.
Jimi was rushed into the [resuscitation] room. He was put on a monitor, but it [ECG trace] was flat. I pounded his heart [CPR] a couple of times, but there was no point, he was dead”. – Dr. Martin Siefert
Dr. Siefert clearly stated 2 thumps and that was it. So sorry, Ivana and myself are not wrong. Take it up with the late Dr. Siefert if you have a problem with what he confirmed.
The ambulance men attempted to revive Jimi because that’s their job as they clearly confirmed, but “The Bat” purposely failed to mention this for the conspiracy theory.
“As I say we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed. But we are not doctors and it’s our job to keep trying till we get them to the hospital. We can’t proclaim anyone dead.” – John Saua Ambulance Man
So, Mr. Saua is telling you Jimi Hendrix was already dead on the bed, but his only job required by law is to continue resuscitation attempts until Jimi reached the hospital for the doctors to declare Jimi dead on arrival, which they did.
THE BAT says: JONES: John ran up and radioed, got the aspirator too…See we just have to keep working on him and we did, my shirt was wringing wet. ‘Cos the ambulances in them days, weren’t equipped like they are now,”
JASON says: Because that’s their job.
THE BAT says: JONES again: ” I went back to the ambulance for an aspirator. We tried to revive him but we couldn’t.” (he said John Suau went to get it before).
JASON says: So, Jones is specifically telling you Jimi couldn’t be revived because he was already dead. Thanks for posting this testimony for our confirmation.
THE BAT says: SUAU: “”Well I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out (with an aspirator).”
In 1995, Suau was interviewed for the BBC Radio One’s “Wink Of An Eye” broadcast and he said: “There’s a standard procedure especially for someone who’s unconscious. They travel on their side. All the equipment is there at his head if you need to do resuscitation, anything like that, it’s all there ready to use.”
So you see, you have your facts all wrong I’m afraid.
You MUST also know that these proceedures are NEVER performed on a 6 hour old dead body. You do know that 6 hour old dead bodies are as stiff as a door, blue and blotched with livor mortis (look it up). Medical staff, even ambulancemen NEVER attempt resuscitation on a body exhibiting those signs.
JASON says: Actually, it’s YOU who has YOUR facts wrong. As Mr. Saua stated, his only job was to get Jimi to the hospital so they could declare him dead because he had no authority to do so. By law, he had to keep trying to revive Jimi even though he was dead. It has nothing to do with Jimi “still being alive” as you’re falsely saying.
THE BAT says: This changes little though. It was an accidental death, no question. I’m only pointing out that it is impossible for Jimi to have been dead for hours BECAUSE they tried to revive him (which they would never even attempt if he had been dead for 6 hours).
JASON says: The fact is, Jimi was already dead when the ambulance men found him and he was pronounced dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbots Hospital. That is documented evidence.
Your false claims of Jimi “still being alive” to have “CPR” is ridiculous.
Tin foil hatters have a habit of picking and choosing the information that best fits their agenda. Barbiturates are bad news not only are they addictive if used long term but they can cause death if someone stops taking them abruptly apparently someone needs to be weaned off them slowly. There was a good reason why Monika’s doctor told her to take only half a tablet as higher dosages cause coma and death.
I’ve been doing more reading about barbiturates. A dose of 2g to 10g is fatal in most people.with the main concern being that many vomit and breathe in the acidic stomach contents. This results in death due to asphyxiation exactly what happened to Jimi. Some hospital treatments include IV fluids, EKG, airway support such as breathing tube and chest X-ray.
The tin foil hatters don’t seem to realize how ridiculous they sound pushing their made up scenarios that never make any sense.
Vesparax was a 3 combination pill that was more powerful than just the normal barbiturate. This was an anti psychotic medication for people with anxiety and schizophrenia which included a sleeping property inside of it. Vesparax wasn’t just a “sleeping pill” as people try to claim. Basically 1/2 tablet would knock out a person that weighed 150 pounds for close to 8 hours. That’s why Monika only took 1/2 pill but got caught lying when she said they were “weak”. Then she changed her story and finally admitted they were strong. Monika clearly knew this was potent stuff since she was prescribed this by her own doctor knowing the correct dosage to take.
I read up on Vesparax a while back but most information about it is not online because this drug has been discontinued in almost every country in the world. If you can locate hardback medical journal books from the 70’s and early 80’s you will find some interesting information about it. It detailed how overdoses were common and how the medication was being abused. Some patients in extreme cases were prescribed 2 pills but were spread out in a 12 hour period and not taken at the same time. Most of them are written in German but quite a few of them were printed in the UK. There was a “Vesparax” manufactured in South America recently, but was not the same as the original.
Jason, I think you need to read that quote from Dr. Seifert again:
“When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead”
AND:
“I worked on him for about ten minutes”.
So, as you can see, Seifert later stated that he worked on Jimi for “about ten minutes” and it wasn’t a few thumps on the chest at all (which is CPR anyway AND is only done on patients that don’t exhibit rigor mortis and lividity!). Jimi would have exhibited those signs if he’s been dead for 6 to 8 hours as you claim.
LOL. Siefert made up a brand new story for a boring interview years later which means nothing. He made an official statement on Hendrix’s death and that will forever be on the official record and nobody can change it.
“Jimi was rushed into the [resuscitation] room. He was put on a monitor, but it [ECG trace] was flat. I pounded his heart [CPR] a couple of times, but there was no point, he was dead”. – Dr. Martin Siefert
His new story is a total joke and he is refuted by John Saua and Reginald Jones who confirmed Hendrix was dead at the Samarkand. He is also refuted by Fraud Bannister and Dr. Bob Brown who stated Hendrix was dead on arrival. He is also refuted by St. Mary Abbots Hospital where they confirmed in a media press conference that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival which was also confirmed by Jimi’s public relations manager.
You should read their official documented statements again:
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – Dr. Bannister
“I was working there when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead. I knew who he was but there was nothing I could do for him. He had been dead for some hours.” – Doctor Bob Brown
“Well, all I know is that Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival” – Les Perrin (Hendrix public relations manager)
A hospital doesn’t certify a person to be dead on arrival unless they actually are.
Les Perrin specifically stated “Jimi’s body” meaning he was already dead. He also confirmed St. Mary Abbots Hospital official statement that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival.
JASON says: “Jimi never tried the pills before the 18th…”
REPLY: You can’t confirm that he he did or didn’t but Linhart’s account would suggest that he might have done – that’s all I’m saying.
JASON says: “This is just another made up wild fictional story by you that never happened.”
Yet, like Buster, you believe Bannister’s account had some truth in it about Jimi, when all he was talking about was a different patient altogether (the 7 foot tall body).
JASON says; “Dr. Teare discoverd a medium rice meal of whole grain rice inside Jimi’s stomach. It wasn’t “granules” under a microscope.”
REPLY: Read the autopsy report! There is no mention of a “medium rice meal of whole grain rice”!! Now you invent things like Buster! Here is what was stated: “The stomach contained a medium sized partially digested meal in which rice could be distinguished.” – “The sample of stomach contents when examined microscopically was found to contain starch granules. Whole rice grains could be discerned”.
If you do some research you will find as I did that drugs and alcohol greatly slow digestion and also, rice isn’t even digested in the stomach! It’s digested in the small intestine!
IVANA says: “I can’t help thinking that we are dealing with Buster again as the sources of “information” are similar. As is the thinking.”
Now that is very insulting. You couldn’t be further from the truth. I’ve been destroying Buster’s pathetic theories and taking his verbal abuse for years. Like Jason, you just don’t understand that medical staff would never – ever – try to revive a 6 to 8 hour old dead body. The signs of rigor mortis and lividity would absolutely rule that out. Those are two of the 5 signs of irreversable death. It’s in the medical charter.
Because CPR was attempted by the ambulance crew and the Emergencies staff, we have the proof that in their assessment Jimi didn’t show those signs an therefore couldn’t possibly have been dead for 6 hours or more (or even 2 hours or more).
This isn’t “conspiracy theory” stuff, it’s actual facts. As far as the medical crews were concerned, Jimi had been dead for between 10 minutes and 2 hours. It is very difficulty to know how long a person has been dead in that time period because rigor mortis and lividity haven’t yet become fully apparent. So, they had to go through the resuscitation proceedures – which is something they would NEVER do with a 6 hour old stiff.
How the hell can you two deny such a thing? Do you believe in fairy tales too?
This doesn’t change a thing about what killed Jimi which was inhalation of vomit due to barbiturate intake. No question about that. No murder. No conspiracy.
I think it would be a good idea for you to read Caesar Glebbeek’s interview with Dr. Seifert about his conflicting accounts:
CG: “In reference to question #28: I am rather puzzled about two completely different statements you have given in the past. I now repeat these two versions by you:
Version #1:
“Unfortunately because the monitor remained so inactive, it was obvious that we weren’t able to resuscitate him, and I have always assumed that Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead.”
– Source: Radio interview with you for the BBC program The Wink of Any Eye: The Last Days of Jimi Hendrix, transmitted 10 September 1995.
Version #2:
“To say that he [Jimi] was dead when they [Reginald Jones and John Suau] got to the [Samarkand] hotel is probably incorrect. When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead. I personally couldn’t find any sign of alcohol or anything like that on him when I examined him.”
– Source: filmed interview with you conducted by David Kramer in London, 23 February 2000.
CG: In Version #1 you say, “I have always assumed that Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead and five years later you say in Version #2, “We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead”.
I would like to think that when Jimi was wheeled into Casualty, the medical persons who triaged him (i.e. before you or Dr. Bannister attended to Jimi) would be fully qualified and would be able to spot a dead patient from a patent who¹s unconscious, and therefore if Jimi was dead that he would have been taken straight down to the morgue and not into Casualty for emergency treatment.
I would normally present both versions if and when I do not know which version is the fully correct one, but in this case your own two versions are so opposing to each other (i.e. dead vs. alive) that I prefer, if possible, to end up with one version and not two.
Dr. Seifert: “I would stick with version #2, the monitor was very inactive but obviously we needed to try to resuscitate him if possible and that is what we did.”
So there you have it folks, Dr. Seifert confirms what he recounted in that filmed interview by David Kramer. On the day Jimi definitely wasn’t a 6 hour old stiff but was considered “perhaps” recuperable (which rigor mortis riddled, 6 hour dead bodies aren’t ever, so medical staff never even bother to try).
To be clear – no murder, no wine in the lungs, no conspiracy. It was an accident. So don’t try and say that I am backing a “conspiracy theory” or anything here. I’m simply pointing out that Jimi definitely wasn’t 6 hour dead when he was found.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Yet, like Buster, you believe Bannister’s account had some truth in it about Jimi, when all he was talking about was a different patient altogether (the 7 foot tall body).
JASON says: Fraud Bannister stated Jimi was dead on admission and the resuscitation attempt was a formality. That was backed up by Dr. Bob Brown and St. Mary Abbots Hospital that officially declared Jimi a DOA. And by Dr. Siefert until he decided to change his story years later.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Now you invent things like Buster!
JASON says: What are you talking about? I haven’t invented anything. You’re the one making the inventions.
“The stomach contained a medium sized partially digested meal in which rice could be distinguished.”
So, Jimi had a medium partially digested rice meal left in his stomach which Dr. Teare could distinguish. Now that is clear evidence that Jimi died in the early morning hours since the rice was still present. Which is why Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated Jimi died no later than 4 am. This is what I’ve been saying all along and you’re arguing with me that it’s “medically impossible” for that to happen. Well, it is possible because the autopsy results says it is. It is documented medical evidence.
You’re falsely claiming Jimi died 10 hours later getting “CPR” which by then no rice would have been distinguished anywhere in the autopsy.
You have no clue what you’re talking about with your phony conspiracy theory. And you just proved Ivana and myself to be correct.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Like Jason, you just don’t understand that medical staff would never – ever – try to revive a 6 to 8 hour old dead body. The signs of rigor mortis and lividity would absolutely rule that out. Those are two of the 5 signs of irreversable death. It’s in the medical charter.
JASON says: Like Buster, you choose to push a bogus conspiracy theory that doctors at a hospital performed phony procedures on a several hour dead corpse.
They never did try to revive Jimi’s dead body which is why St. Mary Abbots Hospital officially declared him dead on arrival. That’s the official record that stands. You keep ignoring it. Why?
You choose to believe Bannister’s and Siefert’s contradicted and discredited stories from decades later to claim Jimi had “CPR” when it never happened.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Jason, you still don’t understand what I’m pointing out.
You seem to think that “dead” means completely gone, brain dead. It doesn’t. Someone cold, unresponsive, not breathing and no heartbeat can be revived if they have been in that state for well under 15 minutes. It is however difficult to say if a patient has been in that state for 10 minutes or 60 minutes because the IRREFUTABLE signs of brain death/biological death (rigor mortis and livor mortis) don’t become evident until after 90 minutes to 2 hours.
After 6 hours, Jimi would have been as stiff as a coffee table, blotched and blue. Unquestionably beyond any possible help. However, you are saying that this wasn’t the case! You are believing a medical impossibility.
JASON says: HENDRIXGUIXE8721/THE BAT,
You are the one believing a medical impossibility. 60 minutes with no heartbeat and oxygen to the brain and Jimi Hendrix can still be revived? Hilarious! Only with the Jimi Hendrix Superman tin foil hat tale of fiction can this happen.
Jimi was dead at the scene, and with the ridiculous scenario you’re pushing, you’re saying he was still able to survive with no heartbeat and oxygen to the brain.
The ambulance was called at 11:18 am
The ambulance arrived at 11:27 am
The ambulance left the Samarkand at around 11:35 am
The ambulance arrived at St. Mary Abbots Hospital at 11:45 am
Hendrix was unresponsive at 11:27 am when Jones and Saua checked his vitals. Hendrix wasn’t breathing and had no heartbeat. They attempted to revive him but weren’t successful. They both said he was dead. As required by law, Saua continued to revive him until they reached the hospital and Hendrix was still dead. When they moved his body, all his bowels and bladder spilled all inside the ambulance. That’s another indicator that Jimi was dead.
When Jimi was taken inside St. Mary Abbots Hospital the monitor was flat because he was dead.
A human cannot survive for 18 minutes with no heartbeat or oxygen to the brain. That’s longer than your ridiculous 15 minute scenario.
Plus Hendrix didn’t just stop breathing with no heartbeat at 11:27 am either, he was like that for a while.
So, let’s say under your scenario, Hendrix died 45 minutes before the ambulance arrived at the hotel. He still would be dead and there would be no possible way to revive him under any circumstance. That’s why the ambulance men were correct as well as Dr. Bob Brown who clearly stated ” Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and nothing could be done for him”. That’s also why Siefert only pounded his heart twice and that was it.
So again, what you’re claiming is medically impossible.
Incredible, you STILL understood what I said. Here we go again:
Rigor mortis and dependant lividity begin at brain death but are not very VISIBLE until after 2 hours. A very expert eye could find the signs after one hour. SO, when Jimi was found and brought in, those key signs obviously weren’t apparent. SO, resuscitation was attempted by the ambulance crew and by Dr. Seifert at the hospital. There is no question of that. SO, because this is a fact, it is 100% certain that Jimi hadn’t been dead for 5, 6 or 7 hours.
The doctor(s) couldn’t assertain if Jimi had been dead for 5 mins or 2 hours. Dr. Seifert said that he wasn’t (brain) dead. So in such a situation, attempts to save the patient MUST be attempted. The FACT that they attempted is PROOF that Jimi hadn’t been dead for 4 hours or more. Get it now?
Yes, Vesparax was a very strong barbiturate, which is why it caused Jimi’s death. What we can’t say with any certainty is at what time Jimi took the pills and how many he took.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Incredible, you STILL understood what I said. Here we go again:
JASON says: What’s incredible is that YOU don’t understand anything about the circumstances of Jimi Hendrix’s death. You are unable to understand what these medical professionals are telling you.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Rigor mortis and dependant lividity begin at brain death but are not very VISIBLE until after 2 hours. A very expert eye could find the signs after one hour. SO, when Jimi was found and brought in, those key signs obviously weren’t apparent.
JASON says: How do you know there wasn’t any apparent signs of rigor mortis on Jimi’s dead body?
Were you there at the Samarkand Hotel to witness the condition of Jimi’s dead body?
Did you ever hear a doctor at St. Mary Abbots Hospital firmly state there were no apparent signs of rigor mortis on Jimi’s dead body?
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: SO, resuscitation was attempted by the ambulance crew and by Dr. Seifert at the hospital. There is no question of that. SO, because this is a fact, it is 100% certain that Jimi hadn’t been dead for 5, 6 or 7 hours.
JASON says: LOL. You still don’t understand why resuscitation was attempted on Jimi Hendrix…..unbelievable!
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Yes, Vesparax was a very strong barbiturate, which is why it caused Jimi’s death. What we can’t say with any certainty is at what time Jimi took the pills and how many he took.
JASON says: Yes, we can estimate the time that Jimi died because Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated Jimi died no later than 4 am by looking at his autopsy report. Fraud Bannister and Dr. Bob Brown clearly stated Jimi Hendrix was dead for several hours before just by looking at the condition of the body.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721: The doctor(s) couldn’t assertain if Jimi had been dead for 5 mins or 2 hours. Dr. Seifert said that he wasn’t (brain) dead. So in such a situation, attempts to save the patient MUST be attempted. The FACT that they attempted is PROOF that Jimi hadn’t been dead for 4 hours or more. Get it now?
JASON says: LOL. The doctors already confirmed Jimi Hendrix was dead for several hours when he was brought in. Their official statements are all on the official record. St. Mary Abbots Hospital officially declared Jimi dead on arrival in their official media press conference. They wouldn’t have made that confirmation public if that wasn’t the case.
They attempted resuscitation because it is required by law when a person comes through emergency. It is also required by law to establish a time of death for the DOA victim. That’s why they did resuscitation, not because they believed Hendrix could be saved.
Even Fraud Bannister said Hendrix was dead and it was only a formality. But you ignore it for the crap you are pushing.
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – Dr. Bannister
Jimi took the Vesparax in the early hours of the morning and the ambulance was called about 11am that’s a whole 5-6 hours that he passed away. It’s just ridiculous to think Jimi would have survived all those hours with a massive overdose of the barbiturate. This new guy needs to do his homework and spare us from his ridiculous scenarios.
Irvan, you timing is incorrect. From what we can gather, they got back to The Samarkand at around 3:30 a.m. When the police visted the hotel on the afternoon of the 18th, they found out that the couple had been arguing at the hotel and that Jimi had stormed off for a while. P.C. Smith: “From what we could gather, Jimi and the girl had had a bit of an argument and he’d stormed off to cool down. When he came back, he took a sleeping pill and went to bed.”
So the first pill might have been taken at 5 a.m. Not a lethal dose at all. Monika told Kathy/Mitch/Noel that when the pill didn’t seem to work (after what? One hour? Two hours?), she “gave him some more”. How many more 2? So, Jimi’s heavy dose of barbiturate might have hit home at 7 or 8 a.m. for all we know and resulted in him vomiting and getting into difficulty between 9 and 10 a.m. (which lines up perfectly to the time that Judy Wong got the call from Monika who was trying to find Alvenia in order to get the name of Jimi’s London doctor).
Again, I’m afraid it’s you that needs to do a lot more research.
You need to move on and take your nonsense with you. Jimi’s body was reacting to an overdose and not some stroll in the park. Jason and I not are two novices we know our stuff really well. If you take the Vesparax out of the equation then Jimi would not have died that morning. So kindly stop making absurd claims that Jimi didn’t take a lethal dose.
Ivana: Show me where I denied that Jimi took a lethal dose. I never said that at all, so why invent? Don’t use Buster tactics on me please.
Of course Jimi took a lethal dose and it killed him. However, we have all the proof we need that he didn’t lie dead for 6 to 8 hours at the flat. That’s all. I’m not backing any looney theory, any conspiracy theory here, in fact I have been destroying them for years.
The problem is, so much damage has been done over the decades by the Henderson book, the Tony Brown books and all the dumb murder theory nonsense that the facts have been overlooked. The end result is you and Jason thinking that ambulancemen and hospital doctors try to revive 8 hour old bodies that are rigid with rigor mortis, blue and bloched with dependant lividity. Unless you think that Jimi was a supernatural being that was exempt from those signs? – the first ever in history. Or that the medical staff were seized by a moment of madness and tried to revive a blue stiff (in fact, that is what you are believing in).
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: The problem is, so much damage has been done over the decades by the Henderson book, the Tony Brown books and all the dumb murder theory nonsense that the facts have been overlooked. The end result is you and Jason thinking that ambulancemen and hospital doctors try to revive 8 hour old bodies that are rigid with rigor mortis, blue and bloched with dependant lividity. Unless you think that Jimi was a supernatural being that was exempt from those signs? – the first ever in history. Or that the medical staff were seized by a moment of madness and tried to revive a blue stiff (in fact, that is what you are believing in.)
JASON says: Obviously, all of this information is clearly going over your head and you clearly don’t understand anything about the circumstances of Jimi Hendrix’s death.
First of all, you were not at the Samarkand Hotel nor St. Mary Abbots Hospital to view the condition of Jimi’s body to make the false claim that there was “no rigor mortis”.
The fact is, Jimi Hendrix was already dead and couldn’t be revived. John Saua and Reginald Jones told you that in their statements. It was required of them by law to keep trying resuscitation until they reached the hospital. They weren’t doing it because they thought Hendrix could be saved. The only reason Hendrix was shipped off to the hospital is because the police didn’t want to write up reports on a dead John Doe stiff who overdosed.
The same thing with the doctors at the hospital. They didn’t resuscitate Hendrix because they thought he could be saved. He was already dead when he was brought in. They did it because it was required by law to attempt resuscitation because he came through the emergency door. Hendrix was hooked up to the monitor and it was flat showing he was dead. The formality resuscitation attempt failed and that was it. Dr. Bob Brown clearly stated Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival, the hospital confirmed it, and Dr. Siefert already stated resuscitation lasted only a few minutes. Not sure why you can’t understand this.
Some newspaper reports from September 18th 1970 right after the various journalists recieved statements from the hospital staff:
Peter Goddard (journalist): “A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”.
Evening Standard (18th September 1979): “Doctors…fought to save his life but all attempts to resuscitate him failed”
David Tune – The Daily Mirror, 19th September 1970: “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yeserday on the way to the hospital”
So obviously, this wasn’t an 8 hour dead body at all, no matter how much you want it to be.
8 hour old stiffs are not transported in ambulances with “full lights and sirens”. That is reserved for casualties in a critical condition/clinically dead and considred PERHAPS recuperable.
8 hour old stiffs are NEVER admitted to Emergencies / Casualty wards or Resuscitation Rooms.
8 hour old stiffs are triaged directly to the morgue on arrival (not taken in for CPR as Jimi was).
An 8 hour old stiff would have remained at the Samarkand Hotel awaiting police investigation.
So, Jimi appeared dead at the flat with PERHAPS the hope of getting him back – i.e. the ambulancemen saw no advanced rigor mortis (visible after 2 hours), so they had to try in case he had only just passed away within the previous 15 mins (ambulance AND Emergency ward protocol).
Sorry, false reporting is not real evidence.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed to the media that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival. A hospital does not officially declare an individual a DOA unless they are in fact dead. They could get sued. The hospital would not make a false statement to the media about the death of a famous rock star being dead on arrival because they would have faced a lawsuit from the Hendrix family and management.
On the afternoon of 9/18/70, St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed in a media press conference that Hendrix was dead on arrival and Dr. Bob Brown announced that news to the media.
This is official documented evidence confirmed by the doctors and the St. Mary Abbots Hospital administrators that can never be overturned by you or anybody.
Pop Star Jimi Hendrix Found Dead
The London Times 9/19/70
London, Sept. 18, 1970- Jimi Hendrix, whom millions of fans considered the world’s finest pop star, died today of what police sources said was an apparent overdose of drugs.
The 27-year-old American musician was found dead inside the hotel room of blonde girlfriend Miss Monika Dannemann in the Notting Hill section. Mr. Hendrix was offically pronounced dead on arrival after being taken in an ambulance to St. Mary Abbots Hospital according to a hospital spokesman during a media press conference earlier this afternoon.
His body was taken from the hospital to a southwest London morgue for an autopsy. An inquest will be held.
Hi Jason, It’s this officially pronounced dead on arrival to the hospital that’s important.because as we’ve both said only a doctor can pronounce someone dead, and the
According to Chris Welch’s biography Jimi died upon arriving at the hospital at 11.45 am. Police said there were nine tablets missing from the bottle where the Vesparax was stored. Dr.Teare stated that the normal dose was half a tablet however Monika stated that she took 1-2 tablets. What everyone seems to agree with is that Jimi took too many sleeping pills. As to why cannot be safely answered said Dr. Thurston.
Yes Ivana, the exact number of tablets taken remains a mystery. For years it has been said that he took 9 but the police found a tablet by the bed and Monika said she took one. I’ve never read that she said that she took 2 though. So that make 8 pills IF, and this is a big IF, the packet was full on the morning of the 18th.
We know that even 3 or 4 tablets would be enough to put anyone in a coma and threaten their life.
As I said before, Monika told a Bild journalist that she had given the tablets to Jimi and she told Kathy/Mitch/Noel that when the tablet(s) didn’t seem to work, “I gave him some more”! This is a big thing because she must have been aware of the pills’ potency as they had been prescribed to her. This has led to speculation that she had deliberately tried to drug Jimi to prevent him from ditching her. Remember that many people had witnessed Monika furiously verbally attacking Jimi in the night and the police found out that it had continued on their return to the Samarkand.
Monika said that she made Jimi a tuna fish sandwich and it has even been suggested that she might have put emptied/crushed pills into that snack.
Another story about the pills came from JImi’s friend Buzzy Linhart. He said that he got a call from Devon Wilson: “I picked up the telephone on the receptionist’s desk and it was Dolly Dagger (Devon Wilson) telling me I had to believe her. What she told me was that Jimi had called her the day or so before and told her that he had been up for days. He had talked to his doctor in New York City and the doctor said – You’ve got to get some sleep – the doctor said – Do you want me to call in some sleeping pills for you to a doctor I know in London? – Jimi said – No, that’s OK, there’s Tuinaols in the medicine cabinet in the bathroom here. – They agreed that Jimi- having a great tolerance to this type of drug -would need to take 3 capsules. But this turned out to be the German Tuinaols which were the EQUIVALENT of three a piece, so they turned out to have the potency of 9 of his usual Tuinol capsules.” (from Inside The Legacy Of Jimi Hendrix by Joe Viglione and Buzzy Linhart).
So this would suggest that Jimi had tried a couple of the pills BEFORE the 18th and had a good night’s sleep. On the morning of the 18th, he went back to them but over did it, especially having taken a brown bomber with Devon at the party, plus the joints and a little alcohol.
Hello there, I agree with most of things you’ve said here. Jason and myself had commented on this stuff in earlier posts. It’s obvious that Monika gave Jimi the pills because he would not have known where she kept them. Unfortunately some of the later “information” I consider speculation and not evidence. Kathy said that Jimi hated tuna fish and would never have eaten it. As for Devon Wilson I just wouldn’t trust what a drug addicted groupie would be thinking or saying. The only thing that is obvious in this story is that Jimi died as a result of taking an overdose of barbiturates, and choking on his own vomit.
Yes, faced with so many accounts, one has to be cautious and can’t accept every quote as “evidence”. However the story comes from Linhart and not Devon Wilson. If he was merely inventing something in order to colour his book (à la Tappy Wright), he could have said any old thing: “Jimi phoned me…” or “I phoned Jimi that morning…”, anything. Instead, he talks of a call from Devon before the 18th. I think it rings true because we know that Jimi was a very experienced drug user and I can see him being very cautious about what he was taking. The confusion about the potency of the “tuinols” (Vesparax) seems very plausible. Jimi, unfamiliar with Vesparax had perhaps recognised the ingrediants in the fine print, hence his questioning about the dosage to take.
Another thing to point out is that Monika had the several boxes of these pills when she arrived in London over a week before she hooked up with Jimi. The pills had been prescribed to her because of muscular pain (from a skating injury I believe), so she obviously needed these pills. So it is very likely that she had been taking them during the 10 days or so before the 18th! It is highly unlikely that the box in question was full that morning. There again, we could say that she finished one box and it was the second box that was started on the morning of the 18th. Speculation.
About the tuna sandwich, Monika did say in one “interview” that Jimi only took one bite out of it and left it. That small amount of bread might have contributed to the “starch granules” seen under the microscope at the autopsy. Speculation again but interesting.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: This would suggest that Jimi had tried a couple of the pills BEFORE the 18th and had a good night’s sleep. On the morning of the 18th, he went back to them but over did it, especially having taken a brown bomber with Devon at the party, plus the joints and a little alcohol.
JASON says: This doesn’t suggest anything. This is just another made up wild fictional story by you that never happened.
Jimi never tried the pills before the 18th and he didn’t have “a good night’s sleep”. Jimi was unable to sleep and he was complaining to all his friends about it. That’s why he took an overdose of Monika’s pills on the 18th so he COULD sleep.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: This would suggest that Jimi had tried a couple of the pills BEFORE the 18th and had a good night’s sleep. On the morning of the 18th, he went back to them but over did it, especially having taken a brown bomber with Devon at the party, plus the joints and a little alcohol.
JASON says: This doesn’t suggest anything. This is just another made up wild fictional story by you that never happened.
Jimi never tried the pills before the 18th and he didn’t have “a good night’s sleep”. Jimi was unable to sleep and he was complaining to all his friends about it. That’s why he took an overdose of Monika’s pills on the 18th so he COULD sleep.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Jimi unfamiliar with Vesparax had perhaps recognised the ingrediants in the fine print, hence his questioning about the dosage to take.
JASON says: How could Jimi “recognize the ingredients in the fine print”? The fine on the Vesparax label and pamphlet was written in German. Jimi couldn’t read German. You are making up wild stories that never happened.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Another thing to point out is that Monika had the several boxes of these pills when she arrived in London over a week before she hooked up with Jimi. The pills had been prescribed to her because of muscular pain (from a skating injury I believe), so she obviously needed these pills. So it is very likely that she had been taking them during the 10 days or so before the 18th! It is highly unlikely that the box in question was full that morning. There again, we could say that she finished one box and it was the second box that was started on the morning of the 18th. Speculation.
JASON says: The dosage for Vesparax was 1/2 tablet a day for a person under 150 pounds. So no, Monka did not finish the box of pills by only taking 1/2 pill each night.
You are parroting the lie Monika Dannemann told for why she was prescribed the pills. Vesparax was not a pain pill. Vesparax was prescribed for people who suffered from severe anxiety disorders, bi polar, and schizophrenia. It was a 3 combination drug that included a sleeping property inside. Again, your speculation is pure fiction.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: About the tuna sandwich, Monika did say in one “interview” that Jimi only took one bite out of it and left it. That small amount of bread might have contributed to the “starch granules” seen under the microscope at the autopsy. Speculation again but interesting.
JASON says: Dr. Teare discoverd a medium rice meal of whole grain rice inside Jimi’s stomach. It wasn’t “granules” under a microscope. The discovery of the rice is the evidence that Jimi died early in the morning which top pathologist Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated Jimi died no later than 4 am. That’s real evidence documented from medical experts. You are no medical expert and you’re only pushing bogus speculation theories with no evidence.
Hi Jason, I thought we’d put this stuff behind us but here it is again. If we just look at all the accusations Monika made against various people accusing them of not doing the right thing. She accused Devon of an overdose, then she had a go at the ambulance officers of placing Jimi in a chair instead of lying him flat, the doctors should have performed a tracheotomy according to her, and then to cap it all off she accuses the Mafia of murdering Jimi all designed to distance herself from any blame for Jimi’s death. The hard fact remains that Jimi died because he took an overdose of her barbiturates.
Hi Ivana,
Hendrix conspiracy theorists and trolls like to come out so they can keep their hoax going, but it’s all the same formula they use.
They ignore the facts and attempt to discredit official documented evidence. They dismiss official documented statements while adding their own tales of fiction. They use what “Monika said” and decades later changed stories to challenge the official record. They also turn Jimi into a mythical Superman who can withstand anything to still be alive to receive treatment at the hospital. It’s a total joke and it’s all the same nonsense based with no real evidence.
Indeed Monika was a liar, and these hoaxers use her lies to push their fraudulent tales of fiction.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: So obviously, this wasn’t an 8 hour dead body at all, no matter how much you want it to be.
8 hour old stiffs are not transported in ambulances with “full lights and sirens”. That is reserved for casualties in a critical condition/clinically dead and considred PERHAPS recuperable.
8 hour old stiffs are NEVER admitted to Emergencies / Casualty wards or Resuscitation Rooms.
8 hour old stiffs are triaged directly to the morgue on arrival (not taken in for CPR as Jimi was).
An 8 hour old stiff would have remained at the Samarkand Hotel awaiting police investigation.
JASON says: I don’t want it to be anything. That’s how it is. Those are the facts. A top expert pathologist already concluded Jimi Hendrix died no later than 4 am. He read directly from Jimi’s autopsy report to make that estimation. And you think you know more than he does by taking what people have stated out of context and adding your own nonsense to fit your conspiracy? That’s laughable.
How do you know Jimi Hendrix wasn’t stiff? Were you there to witness the condition of his body?
Hendrix was a John Doe and the police unfortunately did not want to spend time doing the paper work on an unknown drug overdose causality. So, they shipped him off to the hospital and let them deal with it. Hendrix was taken to the morgue shortly after. Kathy Etchingham has already documented all this information through an investigation but you choose to ignore it pushing a conspiracy.
Both ambulance men said Hendrix was long dead when they found him on the bed. Their resuscitation attempts they made were only a formality because it was required by law. Just like the resuscitation attempt at the hospital was a formality required by law. They weren’t doing it because they thought he could be saved. You still can’t understand what these people have told you.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721: So, Jimi appeared dead at the flat with PERHAPS the hope of getting him back – i.e. the ambulancemen saw no advanced rigor mortis (visible after 2 hours), so they had to try in case he had only just passed away within the previous 15 mins (ambulance AND Emergency ward protocol).
JASON says: Sorry, Jimi Hendrix did not “appear dead”. There was no “getting him back”. He was dead for many hours and that’s already been documented and told to you by 6 medical professionals who witnessed him dead.
How do you know that the ambulance men and doctors “saw no advanced sign of rigor mortis”? Were you there?
Now you have Jimi passing away only 15 minutes before the ambulance arrived….freaking hilarious!
Gotta love these phony bogus conspiracies you made up. You’ve dug quite a hole for yourself pushing this nonsense lol.
I can’t help thinking that we are dealing with Buster again as the sources of “information” are similar. As is the thinking.
Dr. Albert Doyle Buster Yates is back on call?….the world’s “greatest” pathologist and hoaxer!
https://www.verywellhealth.com/signs-of-death-1298439
Dr. Siefert made an official statement that Jimi Hendrix was dead when he was brought in the hospital. Why did Dr. Siefert come to that conclusion? He came to that conclusion because the monitor was flat and Jimi was not breathing, had no pulse, and was unresponsive. So, all of those indicators proves a person is dead and nothing more can be done for them. That’s why Dr. Siefert did nothing more for Jimi.
Both of the ambulance men who found Jimi at the Samarkand also confirmed Jimi Hendrix was dead when they checked for his vitals. They found Jimi unresponsive with no pulse, heartbeat, or breathing going on.
Guess what folks? We have a corroborated story with both a before and after account that perfectly lines up. We have Jimi dead and unresponsive at the Samarkand Hotel and then a few minutes later at St. Mary Abbots Hospital where Dr. Martin Siefert witnessed Jimi Hendrix in the same condition. This ultimately proves Jimi was already dead and never received any phony procedures performed on him.
But we are not done yet, because a police officer named Ian Smith who was on scene at the Samarkand stated Jimi Hendrix was dead and nothing could be done for him. A few minutes later while Jimi was transported to St. Mary Abbots Hospital a doctor named Bob Brown was the first doctor to witness Jimi Hendrix. Dr. Brown is on the official record several times stating Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and nothing was ever done for him.
Let’s not forget that it was Dr. Bob Brown that announced to the world during the St. Mary Abbots Hospital media press conference that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival which was an official hospital confirmation. So, would St. Mary Abbots Hospital lie to the billions of people around the world stating Jimi Hendrix was a DOA if it wasn’t true? Of course they wouldn’t. They had a reputation to protect and wouldn’t want to get sued by Jimi’s family for lying about his condition.
And for good measure, Fraud Bannister confirmed Jimi was dead on admission and the resuscitation attempt was only a formality.
Last but not least, Jimi’s public relations manger Les Perrin went on radio confirming Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival.
So, we have 7 different men all giving the same accurate account of Jimi Hendrix being confirmed to be dead on arrival. We also have St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirming it as well. Are all of these men lying? Are they part of some conspiracy against Jimi Hendrix like these hoaxers like to claim? Of course not. You see, Hendrix hoaxers don’t like these documented accounts because it destroys their hoax, so they pathetically attempt to discredit this evidence by taking it out of context and adding their own conspiracy spin instead. But, they have no real evidence except for made up scenarios based on speculation that makes no sense.
Unfortunately, a couple of doctors Fraud Bannister and Martin Siefert decided to make up new phony stories which ruined their credibility. Fraud Bannister lied about the imaginary wine and Siefert made up a new lame story abou Jimi having “some life” for whatever reason. His later made up story is totally bogus which we will see below.
Siefert made up this b.s. new story for an interview, but you can see his heart isn’t in it, and he’s trying really hard to find the words to tweak his story to make it appear Jimi was still alive but still is telling us Jimi was already dead.
Dr. Martin Siefert: To say that he [Jimi] was dead when they [Reginald Jones and John Suau] got to the [Samarkand] hotel is probably incorrect. When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead. I personally couldn’t find any sign of alcohol or anything like that on him when I examined him.”
JASON says: Quite the story change from before which lined up perfectly with everyone medically involved with Jimi. Let’s look at the clear contradiction from Siefert.
Siefert: “To say that he [Jimi] was dead when they [Reginald Jones and John Suau] got to the [Samarkand] hotel is probably incorrect.”
JASON: “Probably incorrect” Siefert says? How can it be “probably incorrect”? Either Jimi was dead or he wasn’t. Now he’s claiming “probably”? So, Siefert has made up a new story and acts like he isn’t sure if Jimi was alive or dead. That totally contradicts his previous assertive official statement. Remember, anybody that says “probably” is full of crap when changing stories. If Hendrix was actually alive, he would have said “Jimi was alive” and would have stated Jones and Saua were wrong. Siefert chose his word carefully and used a “probably” because he knew he was lying and couldn’t say Jones and Saua were wrong.
Siefert: “When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him.”
JASON says: Both ambulance men and a cop said Jimi was dead. Bannister and Brown confirmed Hendrix was dead. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival. Les Perrin confirmed Jimi was a DOA. Now years later Siefert says “Jimi still had some life left in him”? Really? With no heartbeat, no pulse, no breathing, and a flat monitor showing death and Jimi still had “some life left in him”? Siefert years before said Jimi had no life in him and he didn’t work on him. Now he changes his story to “some” life? He sounds very foolish now claiming to “work hard” on a dead corpse.
Siefert: “There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story.”
JASON: “Some breathing going on”? How could there be some “breathing going on” when he previously stated before there was no breathing going on?
Both ambulance men said Jimi was not breathing at anytime during the time they spent with him. Also, how could Jimi be breathing when his airways were completely blocked with dry vomit? Remember, the aspirator used by John Saua was unable to suck out all the blocked dry vomit in Jimi’s airways. So, it’s obvious Jimi was not breathing due to the blockage and the dry vomit proves that Jimi was there for a long time in that condition. We also have Brown and Bannister confirming Jimi was not breathing on arrival. So, for whatever reason Siefert decided to contradict himself by making up a new phony story.
“Whether you call that life or not is another story”? So, another weak comment by Siefert trying to make it appear Jimi was still alive when he wasn’t.
Siefert: “I personally couldn’t find any sign of alcohol or anything like that on him when I examined him.”
JASON: Well, at least Siefert ends the bogus wine hoax by confirming no alcohol existed.
So, Siefert contradicted himself badly with this weak and pathetic statement. We got a “probably”, “some life”, “some breathing” making it appear Jimi was still alive when he said years earlier Jimi was dead. Plus his new story doesn’t add up with all the other medical professionals involved.
Conspiracy theorists use this lame quote to push their hoax but they seem to forget that Siefert is on the official record stating Jimi Hendrix was already dead and he only pounded his heart twice and that was it. That’s the official record and a years later new story in a boring interview can never change anything. Plus contradicting stories can never be used as evidence and St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi dead on arrival.
Hi Jason, I’m not what they mean by some life and some breathing. These seem like weird things coming from a doctor, DOA means just that.what it doesn’t mean “whether you call that life or not is another story”. What is Seifert going on about couldn’t distinguish a live patient from a dead one? I think it means Jimi was dead which is the official and correct story.
IVANA says: “I’m not what they mean by some life and some breathing. These seem like weird things coming from a doctor,”
REPLY: …and CG contacted Seifert to find out which statement he stood by. Dr. Seifert confirmed that his second statement was the more accurate one – “”When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead.”
IVANA says:I think it means Jimi was dead which is the official and correct story.
REPLY: AGAIN, you and Jason STILL don’t understand the difference between clinical death (no pulse, no breathin,…) and biological brain death (irrecuperable).
AGAIN: if rigor mortis and dependant lividity are not seen (under 90 – 120 minutes), CPR is always attempted – exactly as it WAS on Jimi. I’m afraid that you will have to accept that because it is an absolute fact.
AGAIN: CPR is NEVER performed on bodies that exhibit rigor and livor mortis – so that rules out any possibility that Jimi had been dead for 6 hours – unless you think that Jimi was the first being on Earth to not have exhibited those signs?
First of all, why do you persist in trying to paint me as a “conspiracy theorist” when I have underlined multiple times that I totally rule out any form of conspiracy in this case. Do you have reading difficulties like Buster or something? Beyond belief.
What you STILL can’t grasp is that (as Bob Brown said) somebody can be dead but still have a chance of being recuperable. This is the moment when CPR is attempted!
It isn’t done on patients that are still breathing or hava pulse. It also is NEVER performed on bodies exhibiting rigor mortis and lividity which Jimi definitely would have exhibited if dead for between 4 and 12 hours. Why is that so difficult for you to understand? At some point, one has to accept facts rather than hold on to an impossible storyline.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721,
Why do I call you a conspiracy theorist?
Because, you are ignore factual documented evidence and replace the real evidence with your own ludicrous theory. That’s what a conspiracy theorist does.
Why can’t you grasp the fact that Jimi Hendrix was dead at the Samarkand Hotel which makes him dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital?
Is Jimi a magical man who can come back to life?
Dr. Bob Brown was a St. Mary Abbots Hospital spokesman that told the media Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival on 9/18/70 but you ignore that fact for your conspiracy theory of Jimi getting “CPR” that never happened.
Like I said, but which you keep ignoring my question:
How do you know Jimi Hendrix did not exhibit signs of rigor mortis? Were you there?
Who is documented as saying Jimi never had signs of rigor mortis?
St. Mary Abbots Hospital official statement was Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival which means nothing was performed on him, yet you keep ignoring that factual evidence.
We also have these official documented statements from all 3 doctors that confirmed Jimi Hendrix was dead and nothing could be done for him, but you ignore this fact and use discredited quotes for your conspiracy theory.
Dr. Bannister: “On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”
JASON: This means clearly that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and the resuscitation attempt was a formality which was required by law. Yet, you ignore this fact.
Dr. Siefert: “Jimi was rushed into the [resuscitation] room. He was put on a monitor, but it [ECG trace] was flat. I pounded his heart [CPR] a couple of times, but there was no point, he was dead”.
JASON says: Seifert backs up Bannister telling you Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and nothing could be done for him because he was already dead.
Dr. Brown: “Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead and there was nothing I could do for him.”
JASON: That’s 3 doctors all confirming Jimi Hendrix was dead and nothing was done for him.
How much more clear do they need to be?
Why can’t you grasp this?
I’ve been reading how doctors pronounce someone is dead. They use technology. They hook a body up to machines that monitor heartbeat, brainwaves, and respiration. They are looking for a flatline.
Of course they do. That’s how it works. That’s why they have these machines. It tells them everything.
And when it’s flatlined they unhook the person and that’s the end of the ballgame.
They don’t stand around saying “Gee, he isn’t braindead yet. What do we do? We better try more CPR for an hour to magically get him back”.
And this nonsense that doctors and paramedics can’t determine what a dead body is or estimate how long it’s been dead for is complete b.s. because that’s the job that they were trained to do. Buster peddled this same crap just like Hendrix guide is doing.
Conspiracy theorists always make up bogus excuses claiming “Jimi still wasn’t dead” and they can never offer any real evidence either They replace facts, evidence standard protocol, science, and basic common sense and replace it with fake stories, fiction, and hypothetical nonsense.
Ivana says: Hi Jason, I’m not what they mean by some life and some breathing. These seem like weird things coming from a doctor, DOA means just that.what it doesn’t mean “whether you call that life or not is another story”. What is Seifert going on about couldn’t distinguish a live patient from a dead one? I think it means Jimi was dead which is the official and correct story.
JASON says: Hi Ivana, Siefert was ridiculously trying to claim years later that Jimi “barely had life” with the “faintest of breathing”. He is already on the official record stating Jimi was a DOA years earlier and he did nothing for him. It can’t be something different years later.
Why the change? He can’t have it both ways.
And then when he was asked which story is correct he hesitantly said to “stick with version 2”.
This is why nobody takes this quote seriously except for conspiracy theorists who have an agenda to keep Jimi alive at the hospital for “phony procedures”.
The fact is Jimi was never breathing when he came to the hospital. His airways were completely blocked.
Then Siefert goes on to claim the ambulance men were “probably incorrect”. It can’t be “probably”. It’s either they are correct or they aren’t correct.
Siefert was trying to change the story but while still indicating Jimi was dead.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: AGAIN: CPR is NEVER performed on bodies that exhibit rigor and livor mortis – so that rules out any possibility that Jimi had been dead for 6 hours – unless you think that Jimi was the first being on Earth to not have exhibited those signs?
JASON says: Jimi never had CPR performed on him…it was only a formality.
You choose to believe new made up stories by Bannister and Siefert which are a joke.
Where is your proof Jimi didn’t have rigor mortis?
Jason, Bob Brown confirmed “He was then taken from – instead of into the casualty department, into the emergency section”. Does that sound like a 6 hour dead body to you? If so, you need to keep doing your research into medical facts. You are going to have to accept that Gavin Thurston was wrong about Jimi passing away no later than 4 a.m. Doctors do make errors you know, that is why there are 2nd opinions, disagreements.
The fact remains that Dr. Seifert confirmed (after being pressed) that Jimi wasn’t brain dead on arrival (but possibly clinically dead). Jimi was in the resuscitation room which in itself proves that he hadn’t been dead for over 6 hours. Medical staff never try to revive bodies that old. NEVER. Only in Frankenstein movies. You are believing a fantasy.
Ambulances NEVER try to revive 6-hour old dead bodies then rush them with lights and sirens to Casualty! Hilarious.
JASON says: “Why can’t you grasp the fact that Jimi Hendrix was dead at the Samarkand Hotel which makes him dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital? Is Jimi a magical man who can come back to life?”
REPLY: Jason, I explained that to you earlier. I’ll say it again. The signs of brain death which are rigor mortis and lividity are only detectable between 30 mins to 2 or 3 hours. So it is difficult to say whether the casualty has been dead for 5 minutes or 2 hours. With this doubt, emergencies personel (ambulance and hospital) MUST attempt resuscitation IN CASE the casualty has only been dead for a short space of time. A 6 hour old body would very clearly exhibit rigor mortis and lividity, so obviously Jimi didn’t and therefore hadn’t been dead for that long.
JASON says: “How do you know Jimi Hendrix did not exhibit signs of rigor mortis? Were you there? Who is documented as saying Jimi never had signs of rigor mortis?”
REPLY: Jason, every dead body that has existed on planet earth goes into rigor mortis and livor mortis after 30 minutes of death. Do your research! Why would Jimi be an exception to that absolute fact of medical science? Hell, you’re worse than Buster in your denial of irrefutable medical facts.
JASON says: “St. Mary Abbots Hospital official statement was Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival which means nothing was performed on him, yet you keep ignoring that factual evidence. ”
REPLY: Wow, an out-and-out lie from Jason now! Jimi was pronounced dead in the resuscitation room! You know, where CPR is performed in an effort to revive patients that have died within a short period of time. Bob Brown said that Jimi was being rushed to the Emergencies ward. The press statements on the day say that the team had tried to revive Jimi. Hell, have you studied this case or not?
HENDRIXGUIDE8721, you are the one who is lying.
Every single media outlet on 9/18/70 and 9/19/70 reported Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival because that’s what St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed to them in their media press conference. Dr. Bob Brown was a hospital spokesman.
You have no clue about what happened to Jimi Hendrix. You are choosing to believe decades later quotes and story changes in the Jimi Hendrix case. Siefert changed his story 3 times and you believe his last phony claim. And you are making up fake claims and lying about the Jimi Hendrix case.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721: Wow, an out-and-out lie from Jason now! Jimi was pronounced dead in the resuscitation room!
The press statements on the day say that the team had tried to revive Jimi. Hell, have you studied this case or not?
JASON says: You are a liar. Every single media outlet confirmed Jimi Hendrix dead on arrival. They said nothing about “Jimi being revived”.
Pop Star Jimi Hendrix Found Dead
The London Times
London, Sept. 18, 1970- Jimi Hendrix, whom millions of fans considered the world’s finest pop star, died today of what police sources said was an apparent overdose of drugs.
The 27-year-old American musician was found dead inside the hotel room of blonde girlfriend Miss Monika Dannemann in the Notting Hill section. Mr. Hendrix was offically pronounced dead on arrival after being taken in an ambulance to St. Mary Abbots Hospital according to a hospital spokesman.
His body was taken from the hospital to a southwest London morgue for an autopsy. An inquest will be held.
ROLLING STONE JIMI HENDRIX 1942-1970
October 15, 1970
Hendrix had spent Thursday evening, September 17th, at the Samarkand Hotel flat of Monika Danneman, a German painter. She found him in a coma Friday morning and called an ambulance. The ambulance rushed to the hotel on Landsdowne Crescent, in London’s Nottinghill Gate district, and took him to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital, where he was pronounced dead on arrival at 11:45 a.m., London time.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
September 19, 1970
Jimi Hendrix Dead From Drug Overdose
Jimi Hendrix, the American pop singer and guitarist, died in London yesterday. He had been taken by ambulance from a flat in a private hotel in Notting Hill but was dead on arrival at St Mary Abbot’s Hospital, Kensington.
The cause of death was an overdose of drugs, said a St. Mary Abbots Hospital spokesman, but a post mortem examination would be carried out today. The police said it was in a flat where Mr Hendrix had died.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721: Wow, an out-and-out lie from Jason now! Jimi was pronounced dead in the resuscitation room!
ASSOCIATED PRESS: “The police said it was in a flat where Mr Hendrix had died.”
JASON says: The police confirmed it was in a FLAT where Mr. Hendrix had died. Not in a “resuscitation room” that you are lying about. That proves again that Jimi was dead on arrival and there was no CPR. This was documented and reported on 9/19/70.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: The press statements on the day say that the team had tried to revive Jimi. Hell, have you studied this case or not?
THE LONDON TIMES: “Mr. Hendrix was offically pronounced dead on arrival after being taken in an ambulance to St. Mary Abbots Hospital according to a hospital spokesman.”
ROLLING STONE: “The ambulance rushed to the hotel on Landsdowne Crescent, in London’s Nottinghill Gate district, and took him to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital, where he was pronounced dead on arrival at 11:45 a.m., London time”.
ASSOCIATED PRESS: “He had been taken by ambulance from a flat in a private hotel in Notting Hill but was dead on arrival at St Mary Abbot’s Hospital, Kensington.”
JASON says: Jimi Hendrix was confirmed to be dead on arrival. Not one of these major media news outlets said “the team tried to revive Jimi”. You are lying. Every single media outlet all over the world reported this same thing because that’s what St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed at the media press conference. They confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival. The police confirmed Jimi died at the Samarkand.
So, you are a liar and don’t know what the hell you’re talking about.
Hi Jason, I not exactly sure what good CPR would have been for Jimi. He died of asphyxiation brought on by the overdose. The ambulance attendants tried to suction him out which would have been the best procedure given that this was a drugs overdose which the officers were fully aware of from the start.
Hi Ivana,
From the time the ambulance attendants arrived until Jimi reached the hospital was about 18 minutes. He was unresponsive the entire time with no breathing or heartbeat. Nobody could be revived after that amount of time. That’s why this new conspiracy theory is ridiculous. CPR was pointless which is why when the monitor was flat the Siefert gave up.
Jimi’s airways were completely blocked so no breathing was even possible.
JASON says: “From the time the ambulance attendants arrived until Jimi reached the hospital was about 18 minutes. He was unresponsive the entire time with no breathing or heartbeat. Nobody could be revived after that amount of time.”
REPLY: But they are obliged by law to try, BECAUSE there were no signs of rigor/livor mortis! Don’t you get it yet? If Jimi had been dead for 6 hours, he would have been stiff as a board, blue and blotchy. All bodies are after that amount of time and resuscitation by ambulance men OR doctors isn’t even attempted – we have proof that it WAS attempted. Jeeez, it’s not rocket science.
JASON says: “CPR was pointless which is why when the monitor was flat the Siefert gave up.”
REPLY: CPR was performed, first by the ambulance men (because no signs of rigor mortis). JImi was seen in the ambulance on arrival and it was decided to rush him to the Emergency Room, the Resuscitation Room, where, CPR was performedIN CASE he could be revived. This is NEVER done with 6-hour old stiff bodies. All bodies are stiff and blotchy after even 3 to 4 hours!
So it is simply impossible that Jimi had been dead for 6 to 8 hours.
No murder. No wine in the lungs. No conspiracy at all.
You are unable to understand simple facts and keep arguing nonsense.
Jimi Hendrix was dead for hours at the Samarkand and never had any CPR because he was a DOA.
The ambulance men, Bannister, and Brown confirmed it.
Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated Jimi died no later than 4 am based on the medical evidence on his autopsy report.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital had a media press conference confirming that Jimi Hendrix was a DOA. Bob Brown issued the statement.
Instead you ignore this scientific and documented evidence and keep arguing your phony theory with no evidence at all.
Brain cells start to die 4-6 minutes after death. Ambulance attendants assess the situation before attempting any resuscitation to make sure that the patient is capable of making a full recovery, and not become mentally and physically handicapped because of the CPR.
IVANA says: “Brain cells start to die 4-6 minutes after death. .”
REPLY: Correct.
IVANA says: “Ambulance attendants assess the situation before attempting any resuscitation to make sure that the patient is capable of making a full recovery,….”
REPLY: Incorrect.
Ambulance attendants in 1970 weren’t equipped like they might be today. They didn’t have equipment on-board to detect brain death. The only things that could follow were the physical signs. No pulse, no respiration, no pain response,… this doesn’t mean that the patient is brain dead but could be clinically dead (look it up) but it is impossible to say if the person has been in that state for 5 or 50 minutes. So, being unable to confirm, ambulance crews MUST perform emergency proceedures (respirator, sirens and lights to get the person to Casualty at the hospital,…).
This isn’t “conspiracy theory” nonsense, these are facts.
Obviously, Jimi was in that category.
If he had been dead for 6 hours or more (or even 2 hours or more!) he would have definitely shown the signs of rigor mortis and lividity (look it up) and thus trained medical professionals know in that case, no CPR can be performed because it’s far too late.
Yes, Jimi appeared dead at the Samarkand and probably WAS clinically dead but the medics followed their protocol because there was no sign of rigor/livor mortis.
Again, this is a mere detail and doesn’t affect the excellent work here in destroying the ludicrous conspiracy theories.
Hi Jason, I don’t know have many times we’ve needed to say this. The extent of Jimi’s “CPR” was a few blows to the chest. The doctors had nothing to go by as Jimi was brought in as an anonymous patient who had suffered a drugs overdose.
Relax, I’m not back. I’m just correcting an error I made earlier when I said that Dr. Gavin Thurston got it wrong. I meant Dr. Rufus Crompton.
Don’t bother replying because I won’t read it anyway.
I don’t waste time anymore in discussion with people who think that 6 hour old dead bodies don’t exhibit rigor mortis and livor mortis. ALL bodies since the beginning of time have, so I don’t see why Jimi would’ve been an exception. He was for you two though! Then Jason says “How do you know Jimi didn’t have rigor mortis?” Hilarious! – because he was taken to THE RESUSCITATION ROOM of course, which is a place where 6 hour old bodies would NEVER be taken.
Oh dear, I forgot. I’m not supposed to be back (but I couldn’t resist).
Adieu!
Hi Ivana,
The police confirmed Jimi died at the Samarkand which obviously made him dead on arrival and that resulted with Siefert pounding his heart twice. There was no phony CPR procedures because Jimi was already dead on arrival as confirmed by St. Mary Abbots Hospital and every major media outlet all over the world. That was documented and reported nearly 51 years ago and is the official record. But decades later trolls, hoaxers, conspiracy theorists, and opportunists want to change the events of 9/18/70. They can’t because the real record can never be changed.
THE LONDON TIMES: “Mr. Hendrix was offically pronounced dead on arrival after being taken in an ambulance to St. Mary Abbots Hospital according to a hospital spokesman.”
ROLLING STONE: “The ambulance rushed to the hotel on Landsdowne Crescent, in London’s Nottinghill Gate district, and took him to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital, where he was pronounced dead on arrival at 11:45 a.m., London time”.
ASSOCIATED PRESS: “He had been taken by ambulance from a flat in a private hotel in Notting Hill but was dead on arrival at St Mary Abbot’s Hospital, Kensington. The police said it was in a flat where Mr Hendrix had died.”
I can’t help thinking that the doctors want to appear as some sort of heroes capable of some extraordinary feats in saving someone who was clearly beyond help like Jimi was. Those ridiculous things Seifert said like “if you call that life or not is another story”. It sounds like Jimi was clearly beyond any help the doctors could provide for him.
I’ve read that Monika arrived at the hospital with the Vesparax in hand and spoke to one of the doctors who she claims was more interested in a black man and white woman in a relationship than the barbiturates Jimi took. Monika also said that she viewed Jimi’s body in the morgue however if this was true then she would have been the person asked to identify the body rather than Gerry Stickells who was also given Jimi’s personal items.
IVANA says: “I can’t help thinking that the doctors want to appear as some sort of heroes capable of some extraordinary feats in saving someone who was clearly beyond help like Jimi was. Those ridiculous things Seifert said like “if you call that life or not is another story”. It sounds like Jimi was clearly beyond any help the doctors could provide for him.”
REPLY: Correct. With no detectable signs of rigor mortis and lividity, there was no telling if Jimi had been dead for 5 minutes or 2 hours. In these circumstances, ambulancemen and doctors have no choice but to perform emergency CPR. If rigor mortis and livor mortis are evident, they don’t perform CPR. They did perform CPR.
IVANA says: “I don’t know have many times we’ve needed to say this. The extent of Jimi’s “CPR” was a few blows to the chest.”
JASON says: “The police confirmed Jimi died at the Samarkand which obviously made him dead on arrival and that resulted with Siefert pounding his heart twice. There was no phony CPR procedures…”
REPLY: I am sick of your refusals to accept the facts. You are as blind as Buster and I really don’t understand why, when the facts speak for themselves. Here we go again.
First of all, there definitely were CPR proceedures.
1. The ambulancemen both stated that they worked on Jimi with a respirator (something they wouldn’t have done if Jimi had exhibited rigor mortis and livor mortis – how many times does it need to be repeated before you both get it?). Trying to revive someone with a respirator is CPR!
2. Bob Brown stated that on arrival “He was then taken from – instead of into the casualty department, into the emergency section”. So this tells us that there was a sense of URGENCY. THis would never happen with a 6-hour old dead body which would definitely exhibit rigor/livor mortis. In an interview with AIden Prewitt, Brown said:
Prewitt: “What are the signs that someone’s been dead for a bit?”
Brown: “Well these don’t apply to him, because he was effectively my patient at the time. But – the classic symptoms that a person has died. The body is no longer warm, and so on. And the person’s not breathing. And that doesn’t necessarily mean that you can’t resuscitate them.”
3. Dr. Seifert said “Jimi was rushed into the resus room” – proof that he wasn’t 6-hour dead.
Dr. Seifert said “” My duty as a Medical Registrar was to try and resuscitate any patients coming in who were unconscious. We would have been giving him cardiac massage…We worked on him for a very short time, probably five to ten minutes…”
That’s 5 to 10 minites and you think they just pounded his chest during that time? Get an education.
Dr. Seifert also said in a filmed interview “”To say that he [Jimi] was dead when they [Reginald Jones and John Suau] got to the [Samarkand] hotel is probably incorrect. When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead.”
But you choose to ignore this statement. Glebbeek asked Seifert to make his mind up in relation to his earlier statement and when pressed, Seifer confirmed that this last statement is the correct one.
4.P.C. Smith initially said: “The ambulance men were there, but Jimi was dead … There was really nothing they could do for him.” P.C. Smith was not a doctor and couldn’t tell how long Jimi had been dead, neither could the ambulancemen or the doctors at St. Mary Abbotts, which is why CPR was performed. He obviously hadn’t been dead for 6 hours because CPR isn’t done at that stage because of the visible signs of rigor and livor mortis (apparent after 6 to 120 minutes). Get it?
In “The Final Days”, Tony Brown shows that P.C. Ian Smith two differing accounts. In one he implies that he went into the flat and saw Jimi on the bed but in a later statement he said “I didn’t see him. I was there as they were carrying him out” which is a contradiction in itself!A few years later, in 1993, P.C. Ian Smith disowned the quotes by him that had appeared in Tony Brown’s two books about Jimi’s last days!!
JASON says: ” Jimi was already dead on arrival as confirmed by St. Mary Abbots Hospital and every major media outlet all over the world.”
REPLY: Incorrect. As I have pointed out multiple times, and as Bob Brown confirmed, someone can be (clinically) dead and still be recuperable. Jimi was seen in the ambulance on arrival and the decision was taken to rush him into the Resuscitation Room. PROOF that the hadn’t been dead for 6 hours or more (or even 2 hours or more).
Once Dr.Seifert that Jimi couldn’t be saved, he declared him dead. Thus the press were informed. The press didn’t see Jimi arrive in the ambulance, they found out after the resuscitation attempts.
So to prove you wrong yet again, some journalists got hospital statement on the day and reported this information:
Evening Standard (18th September 1979): “Doctors…fought to save his life but all attempts to resuscitate him failed”
David Tune – The Daily Mirror, 19th September 1970: “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yeserday on the way to the hospital”
Peter Goddard (journalist): “A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”.
So there you have it. Looking at the concrete FACTS, all your arguments about the time of death are completetly wrong (Gavin Thurston got it wrong too).
Hi Ivana,
It certainly appears to be that way especially with Fraud Bannister and the nonsense he promotes.
As for Siefert, he changed his story twice after his official statement. One tragic event can’t have 3 different versions all told by the same man over the course of several years. There can only be one event that happened in history.
Siefert officially confirmed Jimi was 100% dead on arrival and couldn’t do anything to save him because Jimi was already dead. And that is 100% true because St. Mary Abbots Hospital and the police confirmed it which was reported worldwide. Also, Jimi’s autopsy report proved he died hours earlier.
Then years later, Siefert said he “only assumed Jimi was dead”. How can that be when he made a 100% confirmation before that Jimi was dead on arrival? Like I said, a real event can never change.
Years after that, Siefert ridiculously made up a new story saying “it was probably incorrect” that Jimi was dead.
Siefert went from: “100% dead”….to “he only assumed”….to “it’s probably incorrect” .
Siefert went from: “Jimi was 100% dead and there was nothing he could do to save his life” to “he worked hard on Jimi to save his life”.
How can you take a guy seriously who keeps changing up new stories every few years? Fraud Bannister did the same thing.
Siefert also lied saying , “Jimi had some life and some breathing” as Siefert appeared confused as to what “some life” is.
How can Siefert officially confirm Jimi was dead and then years later have Jimi be “alive with some breathing” but then say “whether or not you want to call that life or not is a different story”? Sounds like Siefert was trying to play to the conspiracy theorists while still indicating Jimi was dead. Siefert’s last phony claim was for a conspiracy theory documentary so there was a reason he was lying.
Then finally, Siefert said : “there was some breathing going on” but quickly said “he couldn’t get Jimi to breathe”. Well, which is it? Another contradiction in the same sentence. So, Siefert doesn’t even know what he’s talking about as he is confusing himself with his own lies.
Jimi was dead and he had completely blocked airways from vomit so he wasn’t breathing at anytime. The monitor was a flatline proving Jimi was dead. Siefert saw that and declared Jimi dead. But Siefert decided to make up a new phony account years later in a conspiracy documentary. And sadly, conspiracy theorists try to use this nonsense for their hoax of “Jimi still being alive” for phony procedures.
That’s why all these decades later newly invented fake stories hold no weight in the Jimi Hendrix case. They are telling brand new fake stories from what really actually happened. That’s why the only evidence that needs to be relied upon is Jimi’s autopsy report, the official St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmation that Jimi was dead on arrival, and the original documented testimony that all lines up. Everything else is riddled in contradiction and phony tales of fiction.
Siefert’s original statement and his tales of fiction with 2 new versions:
Siefert Original Statement:
“Jimi was rushed into the resuscitation room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Siefert story change #1:
“Unfortunately because the monitor remained so inactive, it was obvious that we weren’t able to resuscitate him, and I have always assumed that Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
Siefert Story Change #2:
“To say that he [Jimi] was dead when they [Reginald Jones and John Suau] got to the [Samarkand] hotel is probably incorrect. When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead. I personally couldn’t find any sign of alcohol or anything like that on him when I examined him.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
JASON says: There can’t be 3 different versions to an event that happened with the final version in complete contradiction from the original official statement.
Hi Jason, Our new friend is taking things too personally. Jimi was a corpse when the ambulance arrived at the hospital. The doctors couldn’t pinpoint an exact time of death so they said Jimi was DOA. The problem was that there was no-one at the Samarkand Hotel to answer or give any information. The earlier biographies all stated that Jimi died of an overdose, and that he was DOA.
IVANA says: Our new friend is taking things too personally.
REPLY: My new friends ignore the facts.
IVANA says: Jimi was a corpse when the ambulance arrived at the hospital.
REPLY: From the statement by Dr. SEIFERT (who signed the death certificate and worked on Jimi in the resuscitation room) and statemnts given on the day, Jimi was either in his dying moments OR clinically dead OR had been dead for under two hours. He certainly hadn’t been dead for 6 hours or even 3 hours.
IVANA says: The problem was that there was no-one at the Samarkand Hotel to answer or give any information. The earlier biographies all stated that Jimi died of an overdose, and that he was DOA.
REPLY: The ambulancemen were at the Samarkand and they followed the established protocole for a body that doesn’t yet exhibit rigor/livor mortis (which Jimi would have exhibited if dead for 6 hours).
JASON says: “Siefert officially confirmed Jimi was 100% dead on arrival and couldn’t do anything to save him because Jimi was already dead. And that is 100% true because St. Mary Abbots Hospital and the police confirmed it which was reported worldwide. Also, Jimi’s autopsy report proved he died hours earlier. ”
When the ambulance arrived at hospital, do you think they telephoned the police at that moment to say that he was DOA? Hilarious nonsense! Jimi was officially confirmed dead ONLY after the failed resuscitation attempts (this proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that he hadn’t been dead for 6 hours – in which case he would’ve been stiff with rigor mortis and blotched with dependant lividity as all bodies over two hours old are). These are inescapable medical facts. DO SOME RESEARCH!
JASON says: “Jimi was dead and he had completely blocked airways from vomit so he wasn’t breathing at anytime.”
Jimi had vomitted and was in difficulty at the flat. If vomit was lining his larynx/pharynx, it would make it sticky and dried as breathing continued. There is nothing to say that he vomitted once and died right away. Further vomitting would have worsened the situation obviously.
You do well to point out that Seifert said that Jimi was rushed to the resuscitation room (as Bob Brown confirmed!). You are perhaps beginning to understand what that tells us about the condition of Jimi at that time. It tells us that Jimi couldn’t possibly have been a 6-hour old corpse. Come on, wake up. Do you really believe that doctors try to revive bodies that are stiff with rigor mortis and blotched with livor mortis? If you do you have zero credibilty as a researcher. Hilarious! Was DR. Frankenstein on duty that morning? That is what you are suggesting.
Here is the charter which tells medical staff when CPR is never performed:
Emergency responders look for five signs of irreversible death:
– Postmortem lividity
– Postmortem rigidity
– Decapitation
– Decomposition
– Burned beyond recognition
Jimi would has displayed the first twosigns if dead for 6 hours and therefore no respirators or heart pounding would even be attempted and the ambulance would rush off with lights and sirens blazing to the Emergencies ward. The conflicting accounts are resolved by this simple and inescapable fact.
JASON says: There can’t be 3 different versions to an event that happened with the final version in complete contradiction from the original official statement.
REPLY: Exactly – which is why Glebbeek asked him to confirm which account was the more accurate! Seifert confirmed that his 2nd statement was the correct one. Here it is again for all to read:
Dr. Seifert: “To say that he [Jimi] was dead when they [Reginald Jones and John Suau] got to the [Samarkand] hotel is probably incorrect. When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead.”
Let’s have a look at that again shall we?
“When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him.”
and…
“We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead.”
So we have the confirmation from the doctor in charge that day, the doctor that signed the death certificate.
Hi Ivana,
Well, our new friend doesn’t post facts, and only uses bits and pieces of quotes and debunked claims to support a ridiculous conspiracy theory. Our new friend has no knowledge of the Jimi Hendrix case or even knows what “CPR” is.
Jimi Hendrix was a long dead corpse which is why nothing was done for him at the hospital. The ambulance men described in graphic detail that Jimi was long dead and their aspirator didn’t even suck out all the dry vomit that blocked his airways. Jimi had no pulse, no heartbeat, and was not breathing. No CPR would have done anything to save Jimi’s life because he was already long dead. Our new friend doesn’t even understand what CPR is because the ambulance men did not perform any “CPR” or try to revive Jimi. A long dead corpse can’t be revived which is why the doctors at St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi dead on arrival. That was 100% confirmed back on 9/18/70.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: When the ambulance arrived at hospital, do you think they telephoned the police at that moment to say that he was DOA? Hilarious nonsense!
JASON says: What you just posted is hilarious nonsense and you have zero knowledge about the Jimi Hendrix case. The ambulance men phoned for the police at the Samarkand and discovered a dead John Doe on the bed that turned out to be Jimi Hendrix. When the dead John Doe reached the hospital they declared him a
DOA. Learn about the real facts in this case instead of pushing phony stories that never happened.
“There was no pulse, no respiration. We got down to the flat, and there was nobody but the body on the bed. So we had to radio for the police from the ambulance. We couldn’t touch anything in the flat. As I say, we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed, but I did not recognize him.” – John Saua Ambulance Man
“It was horrific, we arrived at the flat, the door was flung wide open, nobody about, just the body on the bed. He was covered in vomit, there was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was. His airway was completely blocked all the way down, his tongue had fallen back. The room was dark, we had to pull the curtains. Well we had to get the police, we only had him and an empty flat. We felt his pulse between his shoulders, pinched his earlobe and nose, showed a light in his eyes, but there was no response at all. I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room, you get a feel for it, I can’t explain it, but you do and I knew he was dead. I didn’t know he was Jimi Hendrix – a bit out of my age group. When we got him to the hospital, we had to clean the ambulance out, it really was a mess. His bowels and bladder, all that goes when you’re dead.” – Reginald Jones Ambulance Man
JASON says: Both men referred to the John Doe as “the body”. They wouldn’t have said that if the John Doe was “still alive”. They both confirmed the John Doe was dead which later turned out to be Jimi Hendrix. So yes, that makes the John Doe a DOA.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Jimi had vomitted and was in difficulty at the flat. If vomit was lining his larynx/pharynx, it would make it sticky and dried as breathing continued. There is nothing to say that he vomitted once and died right away. Further vomitting would have worsened the situation obviously.
JASON says: Hey Ivana, don’t you love this new conspiracy that “Jimi was in difficulty at the flat”? LOL. “Breathing continued” our new friend says. LMAO.
This trolling by HENDRIXGUIDE8721 is hilarious!
Let’s see what our ambulance attendants and the police have to say about Jimi “breathing and in difficulty” at the Samarkand!
“We felt his pulse between his shoulders, pinched his earlobe and nose, showed a light in his eyes, but there was no response at all. I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. When we got him to the hospital, we had to clean the ambulance out, it really was a mess. His bowels and bladder, all that goes when you’re dead.” -Reginald Jones Ambulance Man
JASON says: So, Mr. Jones tells us Jimi was not “breathing” and in “difficulty”. Mr. Jones told us Jimi Hendrix was dead which is why Jimi was declared dead on arrival. HENDRIXGUIDE8721 has no common sense to understand that. Let’s see what Mr. Jones’ partner Mr. Saua has to say.
“An ambulance crew by law just has to keep on working on him until we get him to hospital. There was no pulse, no respiration. I mean we knew it was hopeless, nothing would have worked. As I say, we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed. I was in the back with Jimi, Reg drove. When we moved him, the gases were gurgling, you get that when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant. The vomit was all the way down, we couldn’t have got an airway down.” – John Saua Ambulance Man
JASON says: So, Mr. Saua also confirmed the John Doe was a DOA. No pulse and no respiration. So no, Jimi wasn’t in “difficulty” nor was he “breathing”. Saua also confirmed an ambulance crew are required by law to keep working on someone even when they are dead. Just like I’ve been saying all along. It’s not because Jimi “was still alive and could be saved” like HENDRIXGUIDE8721 keeps lying about. Jimi Hendrix was dead and both of these graphic accounts confirm it. So yes, the John Doe which turned out to be Jimi Hendrix was that blotchy 6 hour corpse.
But wait…..there’s more!
Let’s see what a police officer who knows what a dead body looks like has to say.
“We went to a basement flat at Lansdowne Crescent. The ambulance men were there but Jimi was dead. It wasn’t very pleasant, they had to take some of the bedding from around him. He was dressed but there was a lot of mess, so they just wrapped it around his body and took him off. There was really nothing they could do for him. We followed them up the stairs. I watched them put him in the ambulance and take off. I remember quite clearly the doors shutting on the crew and Jimi. We just closed up the flat as there was no one about. If she’d (Monika) been in the flat, they would never have called us to come, because they just could’ve taken him as normal. But because no one was there, he was dead and circumstances were a little odd, suspicious, they radioed their control to get us in. It wasn’t until later in the day that I found out that it was Jimi Hendrix.” – Ian Smith Police Officer
JASON says: So, Mr. Smith also confirmed the John Doe which turned out to be Jimi Hendrix to be dead. He stated “there was nothing they could do for him” which again proves there was no CPR because he was watching the entire event.
These men were all accustomed to dead bodies because that was part of their job to be around them. Then we have hoaxers like HENDRIXGUIDE8721 who tells us crap like “they aren’t doctors and don’t know what a dead body is”. People like HENDRIXGUIDE8721 always discredit documented evidence and testimony because it destroys their hoax so they make up bogus alternate stories instead to keep their hoax going.
All three of these professionals described in graphic detail that Jimi Hendrix was already dead at the Samarkand. That makes Jimi dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital. This isn’t a Science Fiction movie, this is real life.
Exactly Jason about why Seifert needed to have the 3 versions in the first place. He even needed to confirm which version was the most accurate one. It seems Seifert didn’t remember any of the events of that morning as is just constructing the version that seems the more plausible and not what precisely what occurred that morning at the hospital.
An honest and credible person doesn’t tell 3 versions of a single event.
An honest and credible person doesn’t have to be asked to pick between 2 different versions of the most accurate account.
An honest and credible person would only talk about one accurate account for their entire life.
Siefert was just stringing words together which sounded ridiculous. He had Jimi doing “some breathing” but in the same sentence said “he couldn’t get Jimi to breathe”. Then he said “Jimi had some life” but after that said “whether you want to call that life or not is a different story” meaning Jimi was dead. Sounds like he wanted it to be both ways in the conspiracy theory documentary. He was terribly confused and looked like an old fool.
The fact remains that Siefert is on the official record in 1970 declaring Jimi Hendrix dead on arrival and that will always stand as real documented evidence. A made up story 30 years later in a 2000 conspiracy theory documentary can never change anything.
Hi Ivana,
The fact is ALL 3 doctors would have never confirmed Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and that he was dead for many hours if that wasn’t indeed 100% correct. You never would have had all 3 doctors confirm that if it wasn’t true. They never would have said Jimi was dead on arrival and dead for hours if they actually “worked on Jimi” to save him. Common sense tells you that, but conspiracy theorists try to confuse you by trying to alter reality into their own fictional tale that they want you to believe.
They would have said from the start that they “attempted to save Jimi’s life” but they never did say that in 1970. They all confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival in 1970.
Then 21-30 years later Bannister and Siefert both give a new version of events that are totally impossible and change to new stories every few years. Like I said, there never can be a new version decades later when the real event has already been documented as fact. There can’t be 2 or 3 versions to one single event.
A hospital like St. Mary Abbots Hospital would never made an official statement to the world that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival if that wasn’t true.
All 3 doctors, both ambulance men, a cop, Jimi’s P.R. manager, and St. Mary Abbots Hospital all confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival. That’s overwhelming evidence and it cannot be argued against. Again, if that was false 7 men never would all have officially confirmed it.
Our new friend wants to use decades later new stories made up by Bannister and Siefert for a phony conspiracy theory and argue about rigor mortis and lividty. The fact is, Jimi never received any CPR becuase he was dead on arrival and was dead for a long time. Jimi’s autopsy report proved that and that is scientific medical evidence.
Hospitals don’t work on long dead bodies which is why Jimi was never worked on. Jimi was taken to the hospital by ambulance not because he could be saved, but because the police told them to. By law, the ambulance men were required to work on Jimi even though he was dead, as confirmed by both ambulance men which they testified to. Since Jimi was taken into the emergency, by law the hospital has to make a “resuscitation attempt” as a formality to establish that the patient is dead. Ask any emergency room doctor about that. The flatline monitor proved Jimi was dead and nothing more could be done. But HENDRIXGUIDE8721 tells us this outrageous story that a long dead body received CPR. You can’t give CPR to a dead man with completely blocked airways.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 completely ignores every single piece of real documented evidence from 1970 and uses decades later phony stories instead. This poster attacks Jimi’s autopsy report and St. Mary Abbots Hospital official statement that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival. HENDRIXGUIDE8721 like all hoaxers, attempts to discredit the real documented evidence and presents a tale of fiction instead. Like I said, 6 medical professionals, a cop, a hospital, Jimi’s P.R. manager, and every single media outlet in the world all confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival. That never would have happened if it wasn’t true. They never would have even stated that.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 relies upon a decades later new version from Dr. Siefert which ruined his credibility when he officially confirmed in 1970 that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival. It doesn’t matter what tale Siefert told decades later, Jimi’s autopsy report and St. Mary Abbots Hospital official statement that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival can never be altered or changed and is on his medical/hospital/death record forever.
Hi Jason, Bannister’s fictionalised procedures on Jimi have now been replaced with the CPR supposedly performed by Seifert. Both accounts are equally phony.
I’ve been reading the Death of Jimi Hendrix on Wikipedia. Covers exactly what we’ve been saying. I found Danneman’s account interesting because in the Warner Bras documentary she says that Jimi was breathing normally, and while she was waiting for the ambulance she was checking his pulse. However in the Wikipedia account she says that she awoke at 11am and Jimi’s face was covered in vomit and he was breathing noisily. The article confirms that the CPR amounted to a few blows to the chest like we’ve been stating all along.
Hi Ivana,
These hoaxers desperately want Jimi to have fake and phony “procedures” at the hospital. Albert Doyle Buster Yates foolishly argues that and so does our “new friend”.
CPR on a dead man with completely blocked airways thinking he can be “revived” is totally absurd.
I glanced over Jimi’s Wikipedia page and all the real documented evidence is confirmed because those are the real facts. None of this decades later nonsense that these hoaxers use is even listed since it’s all a scam.
When I have more time I’ll read it all and about Monika.
What I did notice though, is that Dr. Siefert’s official statement is documented on Wikipedia and not a 30 year later fake made up story from a conspiracy theory documentary. Siefert declared Jimi dead on arrival and only pounded his heart twice as a formality because Jimi was long dead at the Samarkand. Even Fraud Bannister confirmed that.
Compression only CPR. Place the heel of your hand over the centre of their chest. Put your other hand directly over the first one and interlock the fingers. 100-120 compressions per minute.
JASON says: “HENDRIXGUIDE8721 tells us this outrageous story that a long dead body received CPR. You can’t give CPR to a dead man with completely blocked airways. ”
REPLY: Unbelievable! That is exactly what you are saying! Jeez, this is like discussing with infants.
Hells bells, we know for 100% sure that resuscitation was attempted at the Samarkand and performed for 10 minites in the Resuscitation Room at the hospital. At the same time, you believe that Jimi was dead for 6 hours! You can’t even understand that you are believing an impossibility. So to try and justify your looney theory, you try and say that there was no resuscitation! You couldn’t make it up (but you do). You are the hoaxer.
JASON says: “HENDRIXGUIDE8721 completely ignores every single piece of real documented evidence from 1970 and uses decades later phony stories instead.”
REPLY: It is you who are denying the FACT that resuscitation was performed on the body (proving without a doubt that he hadn’t been dead for hours).
JASON says: “HENDRIXGUIDE8721 relies upon a decades later new version from Dr. Siefert which ruined his credibility when he officially confirmed in 1970 that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival.”
REPLY: All accounts are from decades later! The ambulancemen saying that they tried to resuscitate Jimi at the Samarkand, Bob Brown confirming that Jimi was rushed to the Emergencies Room of the Casualty Ward, as well as Dr. Seiferts review of his own statements. You also back fraud Bannister’s account that he performed CPR (I don’t – he was talking about a 7 foot tall casualty).
Walter Price saw the ambulance men RUSH into Casualty to get doctors. He saw 2 doctors look at Jimi in the ambulance. They decided to RUSH him to the Emergencies Room, which is when Bob Brownaccompanied the trolley on its way. At that point, he wasn’t confirmed DOA! They didn’t know how long he had been dead! Because there was no stiffness or skin blotching, they followed the established protocol of CPR. After seeing that he was irrecuperable, he was pronounced… dead on arrival. He couldn’t be comfirmed dead on arrival until they had tried and failed to save him – something they don’t do if the body has rigor/livor mortis i.e. over two hours dead! Get it yet? Jeez.
IVANA say: “Hi Jason, Bannister’s fictionalised procedures on Jimi have now been replaced with the CPR supposedly performed by Seifert. Both accounts are equally phony.”
Hey Ivana, I’ll repeat the facts to you again shall I?
– The ambulance men said that they attempted to revive Jimi with a respiratot (no 6-hour stiff there but someone in a critical situation)
– The ambulance rushed to the hospital with lights and sirens (no 6-hour stiff there but someone in a critical situation)
– Bob Brown confirmed thatJimi was rushed to the Resuscitation Room. What goes on in there? Ping-pong? Or, perhaps CPR is performed? Jeez.
– Dr. Seifert said “My duty as a Medical Registrar was to try and resuscitate any patients coming in who were unconscious.”… and you try and say that CPR wasn’t performed?
He later went into more detail about the CPR and you even refuse to accept that? Unbelievable. You two are just out of your depth.
So again, well done for your destroying of the utterly stupid murder theory but apart from that, in relation to the time of death, this page has no credibility whatsoever. Repeating the same facts to you over and over, your blindness/lack of honesty to accept medical facts is becoming a waste of my time. Whatever, the good thing is, your blinkered ignorance about this has been displayed to all.
Now if you will excuse me I must be on my way….
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Come on, wake up. Do you really believe that doctors try to revive bodies that are stiff with rigor mortis and blotched with livor mortis? If you do you have zero credibilty as a researcher. Hilarious! Was DR. Frankenstein on duty that morning? That is what you are suggesting.
JASON says: No, that’s not what I’m suggesting. That’s what you’re claiming. Jimi Hendrix was already dead so he couldn’t be revived. That’s what St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed in 1970. You choose believe in decades later phony made up stories from Dr. Siefert and Fraud Bannister who changed their stories several times. I’m surprised that you don’t believe in the wine hoax.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721: From the statement by Dr. SEIFERT (who signed the death certificate and worked on Jimi in the resuscitation room) and statemnts given on the day, Jimi was either in his dying moments OR clinically dead OR had been dead for under two hours. He certainly hadn’t been dead for 6 hours or even 3 hours.
JASON says: That is not a “statement” from Dr. Siefert. That’s a 30 year later made up fake story that was broadcasted in a conspiracy theory documentary. Dr. Siefert’s official statement in 1970 stated: Jimi was brought in dead, the monitor was flat, and he couldn’t save him because he was already dead. Jimi was dead on arrival in 1970. You choose to believe a 30 year later fake story where Siefert lied saying Jimi had “some life” when 30 years earlier Siefert declared Jimi dead on arrival.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Exactly – which is why Glebbeek asked him to confirm which account was the more accurate! Seifert confirmed that his 2nd statement was the correct one.
JASON says: A credible doctor doesn’t have to be asked “which account was more accurate”. The credible doctor would always be telling the same credible account 30 years later. You can’t have two totally different accounts of a man’s death and still be deemed credible.
Why do you want to believe in a fictional 30 year later account?
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: CPR was performed, first by the ambulance men (because no signs of rigor mortis). JImi was seen in the ambulance on arrival and it was decided to rush him to the Emergency Room, the Resuscitation Room, where, CPR was performed IN CASE he could be revived. This is NEVER done with 6-hour old stiff bodies. All bodies are stiff and blotchy after even 3 to 4 hours!
JASON says: CPR was not performed by John Saua the ambulance man. Why are you making things up?
Jimi was “seen”? Seen by whom?
CPR was not performed on Jimi at the hospital. Dr. Bob Brown stated “no revival was possible”.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721: So it is simply impossible that Jimi had been dead for 6 to 8 hours
JASON says: It is not impossible. That’s what was documented in Jimi’s autopsy report with the discovery of rice inside Jimi’s stomach. Are you calling scientific medical evidence “impossible?
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Yes, Jimi appeared dead at the Samarkand and probably WAS clinically dead but the medics followed their protocol because there was no sign of rigor/livor mortis.
JASON says: LOL. Thank you for finally confirming that Jimi was dead at the Samarkand which is exactly why Jimi was a DOA and the doctors were unable to do anything for him.
You have finally seen the light. Hallelujah!
Our new friend doesn’t know anything about the Jimi Hendrix case. Jimi Hendrix was indeed dead for hours at the Samarkand before he was taken by ambulance to St. Mary Abbots Hospital. Dr. Bob Brown confirms below that Jimi Hendrix was dead for hours early in the morning before he was brought in dead to the hospital. How do you like them apples?
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Hells bells, we know for 100% sure that resuscitation was attempted at the Samarkand and performed for 10 minites in the Resuscitation Room at the hospital. At the same time, you believe that Jimi was dead for 6 hours! You can’t even understand that you are believing an impossibility. So to try and justify your looney theory, you try and say that there was no resuscitation! You couldn’t make it up (but you do). You are the hoaxer.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Jason, Bob Brown confirmed “He was then taken from – instead of into the casualty department, into the emergency section”. Does that sound like a 6 hour dead body to you? If so, you need to keep doing your research into medical facts.
JASON says: Dr. Bob Brown confirms below that Jimi Hendrix was dead for hours in the early morning. Take it away Bob!
“I was working there when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead. I knew who he was but there was nothing I could do for him. He had been dead for some hours.” – Doctor Bob Brown
“Hendrix was brought into St Marys hospital in South Kensington. I was doing locum, and I happened to be in the casuality at St Mary’s Abbott when Jimi Hendrix was brought in. The man had been dead some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Doctor Bob Brown
JASON says: Well, well, well….Dr. Bob Brown clearly stated Jimi Hendrix died in the early morning and was brought to the hospital quite a few hours later. That would make Jimi a stiff blotchy corpse. Brown also said “no revival was possible” which means no CPR was ever performed. This also proves Dr. Rufus Crompton’s death time estimation to be correct. And once again Ivana and I are 100% correct.
Hi Jason, Our friend needs to be a little more discerning about what he reads and believes. Jimi wasn’t unconscious he was dead so the extent of those procedures were minimal. The doctors did what they needed to do to establish time of death and complete the paperwork. That’s it. The rest was left up to Dr. Teare. This new guy is just another tin foil hatter who thinks he can push his weird and phony claims on us. He needs to think again because we are not that easily duped.
Hi Ivana,
Yeah, he’s either reading fake conspiracy theories or just making up his own version of events.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 thinks a dead man with completely blocked airways from dried vomit can receive CPR and still be revived because he isn’t “clinically dead yet”. 🤣
He ignored the fact that every single person who witnessed Jimi at the Samarkand on 9/18/70 said he was dead. He argued against the fact that St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival. He also ignored the fact that all 3 doctors said Jimi was dead on arrival. He uses Dr. Siefert’s fake new story for his phony claim.
Dr. Teare documented this in Jimi’s autopsy: “Hendrix’s stomach contained a medium-sized partially digested meal in which rice could be distinguished.”
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 lied saying only “traces” of rice was found.
The medium sized partially digested rice meal proved Jimi died early in the morning otherwise it would have been fully digested if Jimi died at the hospital later in the day. Dr. Bob Brown confirmed the same exact thing.
“The man had been dead some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: With no detectable signs of rigor mortis and lividity, there was no telling if Jimi had been dead for 5 minutes or 2 hours. In these circumstances, ambulancemen and doctors have no choice but to perform emergency CPR. If rigor mortis and livor mortis are evident, they don’t perform CPR. They did perform CPR.
JASON says: Fraud Bannister already confirmed there was detectable signs of rigor mortis.
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital.” – Doctor Bannister
“He was not breathing. We started pumping his chest to do cardiac massage. We tried to turn him over and he was very stiff and I think the rigor mortis had already settled in,” reports Dr. John Bannister, the attending physician St. Mary Abbots Hospital near London. “None of us knew that it was Jimi Hendrix.”
“Jimi Hendrix was dead a many good hours before he was brought in to the hospital. Unfortunately, there was nothing I could for him as he aspirated vomitus from a barbiturate overdose. It wasn’t as if there was something to be done about Hendrix. There simply wasn’t…any medical remedy.” – Doctor Bob Brown
“Hendrix was brought into St Marys hospital in South Kensington. I was doing locum, and I happened to be in the casuality at St Mary’s Abbott when Jimi Hendrix was brought in. The man had been dead some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.”
JASON says: So, Fraud Bannister confirmed the blotchy black mucous membranes on Jimi Hendrix which are we definite signs of rigor mortis. Bannister said Hendrix was “stiff” when they tried to turn him over. Bob Brown said Jimi died in the early morning just like Ivana and I have been saying all along. So, of course Jimi was stiff and had black blotches because he was dead for hours like Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated.
Jimi took the Vesparax in the early hours of the morning about 4am and the ambulance was called at 11am. He took a large amount of barbiturates no-one would be able to hang on for 6-7 hours and still be alive after all that time. Maybe if Monika had called the ambulance as soon as Jimi was in trouble then he would have stood a chance of survival.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: I’ll repeat the facts to you again shall I?
The ambulance men said that they attempted to revive Jimi with a respiratot (no 6-hour stiff there but someone in a critical situation)
– The ambulance rushed to the hospital with lights and sirens (no 6-hour stiff there but someone in a critical situation)
– Bob Brown confirmed thatJimi was rushed to the Resuscitation Room. What goes on in there? Ping-pong? Or, perhaps CPR is performed? Jeez.
– Dr. Seifert said “My duty as a Medical Registrar was to try and resuscitate any patients coming in who were unconscious.”… and you try and say that CPR wasn’t performed?
He later went into more detail about the CPR and you even refuse to accept that? Unbelievable. You two are just out of your depth.
JASON says: You arent repeating facts you’re posting fiction.
– The ambulance men never tried to “revive Jimi with a respirator”. They used an ASPIRATOR trying to suck all the dry vomit that was blocking Jimi’s airways. And it still didn’t work. Both ambulance men said Jimi was dead and he could not be revived but you keep ignoring this fact
– Dr. Bob Brown confirmed Jimi was dead for hours.
– Jimi Hendrix was not “unconscious” when he was came into St. Mary Abbots Hospital, he was dead for hours and could not be resuscitated.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 has no clue about the Jimi Hendrix case. Every one of these medical professionals said Jimi was dead and could not be saved. Yet, you ignore this documented evidence for your tin foil hat conspiracy theory.
John Saua Ambulance Man: “Well I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out with an aspirator. I mean the vomit was dry, and there was a hell of a lot of it. I mean we knew it was hopeless, nothing would have worked As I say, we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed.”
Reginald Jones Ambulance Man: “I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room.”
Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital.” – Doctor Bannister
“He was not breathing. We started pumping his chest to do cardiac massage. We tried to turn him over and he was very stiff and I think the rigor mortis had already settled in,” reports Dr. John Bannister, the attending physician St. Mary Abbots Hospital near London. “None of us knew that it was Jimi Hendrix.”
Jimi Hendrix was dead a many good hours before he was brought in to the hospital. Unfortunately, there was nothing I could for him as he aspirated vomitus from a barbiturate overdose. It wasn’t as if there was something to be done about Hendrix. There simply wasn’t…any medical remedy.” – Doctor Bob Brown
“Hendrix was brought into St Marys hospital in South Kensington. I was doing locum, and I happened to be in the casuality at St Mary’s Abbott when Jimi Hendrix was brought in. The man had been dead some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
These loonies are interested in the facts. Important point about the aspirator because the ambulance attendants assessed this as a drugs overdose so they would have used that type of equipment. I’ve read that the doctors are concerned about the aspirated vomit as this leads to chocking and death. Jimi had all the odds stacked against him including a companion who did little to help him.
On this day July 2, 1970: Another day of recordings at Electric Lady resulted in considerable progress on “Ezy Rider.”
Nice to see that some of the songs from the film A Star Is Born were recorded at Electric Lady Studios-contemporary artists using the studios.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: They decided to RUSH him to the Emergencies Room, which is when Bob Brown accompanied the trolley on its way. At that point, he wasn’t confirmed DOA! They didn’t know how long he had been dead! Because there was no stiffness or skin blotching, they followed the established protocol of CPR. After seeing that he was irrecuperable, he was pronounced… dead on arrival. He couldn’t be comfirmed dead on arrival until they had tried and failed to save him – something they don’t do if the body has rigor/livor mortis i.e. over two hours dead! Get it yet? Jeez
JASON says: I suggest you study the Jimi Hendrix case because you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Bob Brown said Jimi was dead for hours when he was brought in. I don’t know how more clear the man can be.
Fraud Bannister said Hendrix was a blotchy and stiff from rigor mortis. There was no CPR performed on Hendrix because he was dead for hours.
“Jimi Hendrix was dead a many good hours before he was brought in to the hospital. Unfortunately, there was nothing I could for him as he aspirated vomitus from a barbiturate overdose. It wasn’t as if there was something to be done about Hendrix. There simply wasn’t…any medical remedy.” – Doctor Bob Brown
“Hendrix was brought into St Marys hospital in South Kensington. I was doing locum, and I happened to be in the casuality at St Mary’s Abbott when Jimi Hendrix was brought in. The man had been dead some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital.” – Doctor Bannister
“He was not breathing. We started pumping his chest to do cardiac massage. We tried to turn him over and he was very stiff and I think the rigor mortis had already settled in,” reports Dr. John Bannister, the attending physician St. Mary Abbots Hospital near London. “None of us knew that it was Jimi Hendrix.”
Hi Jason, Tin foil hatters aren’t interested in the real facts. They are turned on by sensationalism. How dumb do you need to be to believe that someone who had swallowed a massive overdose of a barbiturate could possibly be alive after 6-7 hours after taking it. I tend to believe stories that are written close to the event because as we’ve seen with Jimi’s story things start changing and the facts become distorted, and manipulated.
Jimi was given a few thumps to the chest; he didn’t receive the compressions which are given within twenty minutes. All of the doctors could tell Jimi was beyond saving but they probably felt that they had to do something as Jimi was wheeled in casualty. The time of death was recorded in casualty, and not Jimi’s actual time of death back at the Samarkand; this was established during the autopsy by Dr. Teare after examining the content of Jimi’s stomach .
Hi Ivana,
Tin foil hatters love tabloid journalism and they add their own fiction.
I know it’s ridiculous. And they still say Jimi was alive to have “procedures” hours after he OD’d.
Yeah, both Monika and Fraud Bannister started with the distortion and others followed in their footsteps by writing conspiracy books to make money off Jimi.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Jimi unfamiliar with Vesparax had perhaps recognised the ingrediants in the fine print, hence his questioning about the dosage to take.
JASON says: How could Jimi “recognize the ingredients in the fine print”? The fine on the Vesparax label and pamphlet was written in German. Jimi couldn’t read German.
“Jimi questioned the dosage”? Jimi took a massive overdose. So no, he didn’t “question the dosage. He wouldn’t have died if he took the prescribed amount.
You are making up wild stories that never happened.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Another thing to point out is that Monika had the several boxes of these pills when she arrived in London over a week before she hooked up with Jimi. The pills had been prescribed to her because of muscular pain (from a skating injury I believe), so she obviously needed these pills. So it is very likely that she had been taking them during the 10 days or so before the 18th! It is highly unlikely that the box in question was full that morning. There again, we could say that she finished one box and it was the second box that was started on the morning of the 18th. Speculation.
JASON says: The dosage for Vesparax was 1/2 tablet a day for a person under 150 pounds. So no, Monka did not finish the box of pills by only taking 1/2 pill each night.
You are parroting the lie Monika Dannemann told for why she was prescribed the pills. Vesparax was not a pain pill. Vesparax was prescribed for people who suffered from severe anxiety disorders, bi polar, and schizophrenia. It was a 3 combination drug that included a sleeping property inside. Again, your speculation is pure fiction and you’re making up total nonsense.
Hi Jason, I’m not sure why anyone needs to speculate in this story. Things are pretty much clear.. Jimi took a high dosage of someone else’s medication, choked and died. If the ambulance had been called as soon as he was in trouble then Jimi would have had a better chance of survival.
Been looking at some photos of the Samarkand Hotel while the flowers and garden look nice, the furniture and rooms look a bit dated. Monika was in the basement apartment so well done to the ambulance attendants who carried Jimi up those steep stairs.
Hi Ivana,
They “speculate” so they can throw out false claims to keep the hoax going.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721: So, the first pill might have been taken at 5 a.m. Not a lethal dose at all.
Monika told Kathy/Mitch/Noel that when the pill didn’t seem to work (after what? One hour? Two hours?), she “gave him some more”. How many more 2?
So, Jimi’s heavy dose of barbiturate might have hit home at 7 or 8 a.m. for all we know and resulted in him vomiting and getting into difficulty between 9 and 10 a.m. (which lines up perfectly to the time that Judy Wong got the call from Monika who was trying to find Alvenia in order to get the name of Jimi’s London doctor).
JASON says: Sorry HENDRIXGUIDE8721, this theory is impossible for various reasons.
But the main reason it’s impossible from the start, is that you’re using Monika’s lies to construct this nonsensical theory. And that’s what these conspiracy theorists do, they take Monika’s initial lie and they attempt to make up their own timeline scenario of made up events that never happened. That’s why they will always forever be wrong. Monika Dannemann was bad news, a pathological liar, and you should never use her lies for your Jimi Hendrix conspiracies.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says that “the first pill might have been taken at 5 am and it wasn’t a lethal dose”. That is completely false and a made up theory. There was no “first pill” and Monika Dannemann wasn’t giving Jimi “more pills” throughout the morning of September 18th because we already have evidence that proves this scenario never happened. Plus Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated Jimi died no later than 4 am. which makes the “first pill” at 5 am totally impossible. Jimi would have already been dead at 5 am according to a top notch expert pathologist who read over Jimi’s autopsy report to make that final estimation. Medical facts always will debunk invented made up theories.
Documented evidence shows that Jimi Hendrix was still fully dressed when he was found dead on the bed at the Samarkand. So what does that actually mean? Well, it tells us that Monika is the pathological liar we all know her to be and that HENDRIXGUIDE8721 is totally wrong with this invented theory.
If Jimi was given a “first pill” as HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says and Monika lied about, then Jimi would have been undressed and under the covers in bed. He wouldn’t have been fully clothed on top of the bed laying on his back. Who in the world would try to sleep on top of the bed with their clothes still on? This theory is false for one simple fact. Jimi would have been undressed and under the covers if he took a “first pill” because he would be waiting for the pill to take effect. If the first pill didn’t work, he would still be under the covers undressed trying to take more pills to get some sleep. So, this evidence proves Monika Dannemann to be a liar and HENDRIXGUIDE8721 to be totally wrong with this phony theory.
The fact is, Jimi Hendrix took all the pills at once, just like he always took them. The massive potency of the pills instantly took effect which knocked him out, which is why he was found on his back fully clothed on top of the bed. He never had the time to undress because the overdose took him over and fully rendered him unconscious.
Also, Vesparax was a powerful 3 combination barbiturate in which 1/2 pill would put a 150 pound person to sleep for hours . So, one full pill would have easily put Jimi to sleep in which it was designed to do. This business that “the pills weren’t strong enough”, “Jimi had a famous tolerance to drugs”, or “didn’t work for Jimi” is complete crap because doctors never overprescribed Vesparax for their patients because of the risk of an overdose. The fact is, Jimi was known to take more than one barbiturate at all once, but this time he made the fatal mistake of taking several powerful pills all at once which killed him.
Monika Dannemann is on the official record claiming that she took one of her nightly Vesparax pills. So, if she did take her nightly Vesparax pill as she testified to, then there would be no possible way she would still be wide awake to be giving Jimi “more pills” throughout the morning because she would be knocked out herself sleeping. So, Monika’s lies have caught up with her and this is just another fact that debunks HENDRIXGUIDE8721’s theory.
It’s easy to tell what HENDRIXGUIDE8721 is attempting to do here by pushing Jimi’s overdose all the way to 7-10 am so the “Jimi was still alive to get phony procedures at the hospital” claim can be made. There’s no evidence for this claim and it’s just a made up conspiracy theory. That’s why it’s easily debunked.
Jimi Hendrix took a massive overdose of Vesparax. It wouldn’t take 2 hours for Jimi to start getting sick from the pills. The effects would have instantly put Jimi in an unconscious state with coma coming very quickly followed by the difficulty in breathing and the vomiting. The pills did the damage to Jimi’s body and then his body rejected the pills which proves that with the vomit. The fact he was on his back made him inhale his own vomit obstructing his breathing to where he could no longer breathe anymore which then ultimately killed him. That’s why he was found with dry vomit completely blocking his airways. A person can’t still be “breathing” in that condition with completely obstructed airways even for a few minutes. That’s why this asinine claim that Jimi was “still breathing” at the hospital is totally absurd. The blocked airways stopped Jimi from breathing and the ambulance men were unable to clear his airways because there was too much dried vomit going all the way down.
It would be impossible for Jimi to be breathing with completely blocked airways, which was proven when Jimi was unresponsive with no heartbeat, no pulse, and no breathing which was documented by the ambulance men. Jimi isn’t going to magically get better for a phony “CPR” treatment only a few minutes later, which is why he was officially declared dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbots Hospital. The flat monitor proved he was officially dead which is why Siefert did nothing more for him. But unfortunately, Siefert decided to tell a phony tale years later that “Jimi still had some life to him” and that the ambulance men were “probably incorrect”. This really makes Siefert look like a fool along with his partner in crime Fraud Bannister. Can you imagine doctors “working hard” to save a man that’s already been dead for a long time? It’s totally absurd. That’s why Jimi Hendrix was officially declared dead on arrival which is on the official record and is just plain old common sense. Hospitals don’t do work on long dead bodies which is why these absurd claims of “phony procedures” are laughable.
What evidence is there that Jimi Hendrix had “phony procedures” performed on him? There is none. All we have are decades later made up stories from the discredited Fraud Bannister who claims he “worked hard” to save a long dead corpse. Then Dr. Siefert joined in the act years later to make the same bogus claim. Still no documented medical reports exist of these said “phony procedures” which proves it didn’t happen. If there was “procedures”, a medical report would have been documented for everything done for Jimi Hendrix that morning. Nothing like that was ever documented proving these are nothing but decades later phony tales. Plus St. Mary Abbots Hospital would have stated in their official media press conference that they “worked hard to save Jimi’s life but it was a futile effort”. They never made any such statement. All they said was “Jimi died from a drug overdose and was dead on arrival and they didn’t know how he died and were waiting an autopsy”. So, these “phony procedures” never happened.
And how can you believe a person when they make an official statement that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and couldn’t be saved and then years later completely make up new stories that Jimi was “still alive” to be worked on? That clearly doesn’t add up. If what they are saying now is true, then why didn’t they tell us that in the first place? Obviously, they are both lying now because they wouldn’t have stated Jimi was already dead if it wasn’t true. But their recent lies have been debunked, because Dr. Bob Brown clearly stated Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and nothing was ever done for him. That perfectly lines up with the St. Mary Abbots Hospital official statement that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival. A hospital would never make an official statement like that if it wasn’t true.
The evidence proves that Jimi took all the pills at once and suffered his overdose still being fully dressed. Dr. Teare’s discovery of a medium rice meal still left inside Jimi’s stomach also proves his overdose happened hours before early in the morning. The dry vomit found on the pillow and inside Jimi’s throat is also evidence that he was there for a long time. Vomit doesn’t dry up like that unless it’s been hours. Also, the condition of Jimi’s body proves that as well. All of this is documented on Jimi’s official record and it’s why Jimi was a DOA, but hoaxers ferciously try to argue against facts and end up looking rather stupid when they have no evidence except for claims, debunked quotes, and absurd theories.
So, the rule of thumb of looking at Jimi’s death is to always use common sense and look at the facts which includes science and the real documented evidence of the case. Attempting to use Monika Dannemann as your main source and constructing a timeline based on her lies will always make you look very foolish with a phony theory.
Hi Jason, A few things are a stand out in this story, Jimi was fully dressed on top of the bed, dryvomit all the way down, the very minimal attempt to help Jimi in casualty, and the contents of Jimi’s stomach which Dr. Teare used to establish time of death.It all adds up to Jimi having died quite early on soon after taking the Vesparax.
When you look at all the facts and evidence that’s what actually happened. Some people want to create a phony alternate version that never happened.
New Conspiracy Theory Claims Morgan Freeman Is Actually Jimi Hendrix
Sep 26, 2019
Legendary guitar god Jimi Hendrix died on September 18th, 1970. …Or did he?
A new conspiracy theory is making the rounds that Hendrix survives to this day – and is actually legendary actor Morgan Freeman.
The two do share a certain facial resemblance. And Freeman first became famous on the PBS kid’s show The Electric Company, which premiered in 1971 – just one year after Hendrix’s alleged death.
However, like most conspiracy theories, this one is too good to be true. Snopes has already debunked it, pointing out that Freeman’s acting career began in 1964, while Hendrix’s body was examined post-mortem by a local coroner.
https://989kkzx.iheart.com/featured/scott-rusk/content/2019-09-26-new-conspiracy-theory-claims-morgan-freeman-is-actually-jimi-hendrix/
Belongs in the bin with the other conspiracy theories.
Hi Ivana,
I was reading the “Ready Steady Gone” website again that is a 4 part biography about Michael Jeffery. In the comment section on page 4 it should be no surprise who showed up to post the same usual conspiracy nonsene. Yes, “our friend” Buster was peddling more garbage about a “Hendrix murder” and used his “AlfieNuemann” pseudonym to agree with himself in the comment below. That’s the same pseudonym he used to attack us here last year. This fraud infiltrates every site associated with Jimi Hendrix to peddle these bogus “murder” conspiracies. This guy is mentally ill and has serious problems.
Hi Jason, I’ve seen this. Can’t mistake his style of writing, and what he says. Same bunch of lies and rubbish.
I was watching a program last night and they were discussing whether people who publish should use their real names or pseudonyms. One of the panelists said that people should have the courage to use their real names while another stated that there should be a choice as some researchers prefer to use pseudonyms.
A credible person would in fact use their real name because they would want their great work credited to themselves. Unless they are doing top secret work where their life could be in danger is really the only reason to use a pseudonym. Most people that use pseudonyms are doing it hide their true identity so their credibility isn’t tarnished. Writers, directors and producers that didn’t want their names linked to certain work they did used pseudonyms for the fear of their name being ruined. That also allows people to write garbage including slander since their true identity isn’t revealed to the public.
In the case of Brian Doyle, he uses various pseudonyms to troll websites to push his phony “Hendrix murder” hoax. He also uses his pseudonyms to make it appear that he has supporters on those sites using those pseudonyms agree with himself. He’s done that on multiple sites (including here) and on the review section at Amazon. His reason for pseudonyms is done purely for trolling purposes. I’ve read he even impersonated his dead father “Albert” in political forums and on Amazon which is a reason he was banned from those places, besides his usual abusive behavior breaking the terms of service rules.
What a piece of work. We’ve seen what he’s capable of. 👎
Albert Doyle
(Banned)
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/fora/user-328.html
He’s made a few enemies along the way, and he got what he deserved. Hooray 😃
Read the different times Monika said she woke up that morning. The time went all the way from 9am-11am. We know she didn’t go to bed at all as the Vesparax she claimed she took would have knocked her out for a minimum of eight hours. Eric Burdon says he got a phone call from Monika in the early hours so it’s fair to assume she didn’t go to bed at all.
Monika claimed most of the time she woke up around 10 am but her accounts varied over the years as to which time she claimed she actually woke up.
It would be interesting to know how far away from the Samarkand where there was a place to buy cigarettes. Monika claimed she woke up after 10 and left to buy cigarettes. She returned back to the room at 11 am to find Jimi sick. It wouldn’t take that long just to buy cigarettes. That was a phony story and it’s too bad she wasn’t questioned more thoroughly with her many inconsistencies.
Burdon said it was early in the morning when she called and it was still dark out.
I looked up a map of Notting Hill and Lansdowne Crescent the shops seem very close maybe a 5-10 minute walk. I don’t think Monika would have used her car to get there.
So it would be about a 20 minute trip and not 45 minutes when she claimed she arrived back at the Samarkand at 11.
This is where this story gets a bit confusing. Monika said she went out for cigarettes after looking at Jimi who was supposedly breathing normally. I have a feeling Monika didn’t look at Jimi at all before going out because if she had she would have noticed that a Jimi was not breathing at all and that he was covered in vomit. Just the smell would have signaled something was wrong. I doubt this cigarette story happened at all.
THIS DATE IN MUSIC HISTORY (July 9th): 1947: Mitch Mitchell (Jimi Hendrix Experience, drums) was born
Happy birthday Mitch celebrating in heaven with Jimi and Noel no doubt
Hi Ivana,
Interesting to see Monika’s official statement and then her various new concocted stories of the morning of September 18, 1970.
She claimed they “stayed in” and she cooked spaghetti. Monika seems to conveniently have a sudden case of amnesia forgetting about her row with Jimi at Harvey’s where they actually were during the evening.
“The not very nice” people were Jimi’s friends and associates. So, Monika lied and attempted to turn a fun party into something sinister because she wasn’t invited.
Jimi just ate a rice meal so there would be no need to eat a sandwich right after.
Monika says here that she woke up at 11am to find Jimi’s face covered in vomit. She later claimed to have woken up at 10am with “Jimi still sleeping peacefully” and she left to go buy cigarettes. No mention of that phony cigarette story in this statement.
Yeah, it’s a real shame that Monika wasn’t questioned more thoroughly after she started changing her stories.
“On Thursday 17th September we stayed in and I cooked a meal of spaghetti and we talked until about 2am. He then said he had to go somewhere and see some people about his band and I drove him to a house in Great Cumberland place. I asked him if I could go with him, but he said that they were not very nice people. Later about 2:45am, I picked him up there and went home. On our arrival I made a sandwich and we talked until about 7am. He then said he wanted to go to sleep. He took some tablets and we went to bed. I woke up about 11am and saw that Jimi’s face was covered in vomit. I tried to wake him, but could not. I called an ambulance and he was taken to the Hospital in Kensington.” – Monika Dannemann 9/18/70
Hi Jason. Monika basically stuck to the same story for years. The talking until about 2am cuts out the evening spent at Harvey’s place. And that cosy spaghetti dinner never could have taken place as there was food in the flat according to Terry Slater.
Hi Jason, It’s only after other people started speaking up did we get the full story or at least a better picture of what really went on between Jimi and Monika and the events of that morning.
Just popping in to drop off this page about DOA/clinical death/rigor mortis/livor mortis and in what conditions CPR (yes, even chest pounding) is attempted in Casualty admissions. It’ll help you to understand this case better I think:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_on_arrival
Hi Ivana,
Monika came up with the “talking to 2am” story so the incident at Harvey’s wouldn’t come out. She also left out the part that she was uninvited to Kameron’s party and she caused a scene there as well. The guests at the party didn’t think too much of her either as they told her to go away until Jimi reluctantly left to go back with her. Monika needed to create this romantic evening and early morning fantasy so the true story didn’t come out. She was in fear of being accused of killing Jimi with her pills.
The imaginary spaghetti dinner and early morning sandwich never took place because Jimi ate rice at Kameron’s party. If Jimi already ate a big spaghetti dinner, he certainly wouldn’t be hungry again for a rice meal and then a sandwich right when he got back to the Samarkand. For the record, party guests confimed Jimi ate the rice a little before or a little after midnight which was supposed to be the same time Monika claimed they were having a romantic evening.
And the main evidence that debunks the imaginary spaghetti dinner and the sandwich is that no noodles or tuna was found in Jimi’s stomach in the autopsy. A medium sized partially digested rice meal was the only food found in Jimi’s stomach. The fact that it was still only partially digested means Jimi died in the early morning hours when he returned from Kameron’s party. Jimi certainly didn’t eat rice at 7am when Monika claimed he took her pills to sleep.
LOL. HENDRIXGUIDE8721 popped back in to push his ridiculous “Jimi had phony procedures” hoax.
This guy simply does not understand the Jimi Hendrix case nor was he there to witness Jimi dead or the condition of Jimi’s body, but HENDRIXGUIDE8721 pretends Jimi Hendrix a stiff blotchy several hour dead corpse had “CPR” performed even when his airways were completely blocked with dried vomit. Thanks again for the laugh!
2 doctors confirmed Jimi Hendrix was a several hour long dead blotchy corpse stiff with rigor mortis. But in the fantasy world of HENDRIXGUIDE8721, Jimi was “still alive” to have “CPR” to save his life. Hilarious!
Here is what 2 doctors that witnessed Jimi’s dead body had to say:
“Jimi Hendrix was dead a many good hours before he was brought in to the hospital. Unfortunately, there was nothing I could for him as he aspirated vomitus from a barbiturate overdose. It wasn’t as if there was something to be done about Hendrix. There simply wasn’t…any medical remedy.” – Doctor Bob Brown
“Hendrix was brought into St Marys hospital in South Kensington. I was doing locum, and I happened to be in the casuality at St Mary’s Abbott when Jimi Hendrix was brought in. The man had been dead some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital.” – Doctor Bannister
“He was not breathing. We started pumping his chest to do cardiac massage. We tried to turn him over and he was very stiff and I think the rigor mortis had already settled in,” reports Dr. John Bannister, the attending physician St. Mary Abbots Hospital near London. “None of us knew that it was Jimi Hendrix.”
JASON says: Both doctors confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival and dead for hours.
A black mouth and black mucous membranes indicates death happened hours earlier.
A stiff body indicates rigor mortis meaning death happened hours earlier.
No circulation through tissues means death happened a long time ago meaning Jimi was already brain dead and could not be saved which is why Siefert only pounded Jimi’s heart twice and that was the formality “resuscitation” attempt.
These are the facts and this totally lines up with the St. Mary Abbots Hospital dead on arrival confirmation to the media and the medium sized rice meal still only partially digested in Jimi’s stomach which proved he died in the early morning hours.
Hi Jason, He’s back. If Jimi had a chance of being saved the doctors would have done just that. but he was clearly beyond that.
Yeah, he’s back with more foolishness. Every single piece of documented evidence easily refutes his fictional account of September 18, 1970.
I really don’t know how much more clear Dr. Bob Brown can be for these tin foil hatters to understand that nothing could have been done to save Jimi’s life because he was already dead for hours from a barbiturate overdose. Brown clearly states “no medical remedy could have saved Jimi Hendrix” meaning no “CPR” was ever performed nor was Jimi ever in a position to be saved.
“Jimi Hendrix was dead a many good hours before he was brought in to the hospital. Unfortunately, there was nothing I could for him as he aspirated vomitus from a barbiturate overdose. It wasn’t as if there was something to be done about Hendrix. There simply wasn’t…any medical remedy.” – Doctor Bob Brown
OK, seeing as you jokers are STILL spreading false information (like Buster likes to do), here it is again for visitors to read.
Adrien Prewitt: What are the signs that someone’s been dead for a bit?
Bob Brown: Well these don’t apply to him, because he was effectively my patient at the time. But – the classic symptoms that a person has died. The body is no longer warm, and so on. And the person’s not breathing. And that doesn’t necessarily mean that you can’t resuscitate them.
“Well these don’t apply to him” ???
So, one moment he says that Jimi appeared to dead for hours, then he says that the classic symptoms of some dead for hours (i.e. rigor mortis – livor mortis) didn’t apply to JImi! Obvioulsy Jimi hadn’t been dead for over two hours in that case.
So, your star witness doesn’t see this the way you do with your whacky idea that doctors take 8 hour stiffs into the Resuscitation Room. Hilarious! Infantile logic from you two. You obviously have no knowledge of human biology. Do some research.
Dr. Seifert (who was in charge and signed the Death Certificate) :
“We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead.”
The only joker here is HENDRIXGUIDE8721 who is too stupid to understand simple English.
Jimi Hendrix “didn’t appear dead”. This is the conspiracy that hoaxers like HENDRIXGUIDE8721 use to push the lie that “Jimi Hendrix had phony procedures”.
Hendrix was dead for hours which was told by 2 doctors in graphic detail that witnessed his decomposing corpse.
“Jimi Hendrix was dead a many good hours before he was brought in to the hospital. Unfortunately, there was nothing I could for him as he aspirated vomitus from a barbiturate overdose. It wasn’t as if there was something to be done about Hendrix. There simply wasn’t…any medical remedy.” – Doctor Bob Brown
“Hendrix was brought into St Marys hospital in South Kensington. I was doing locum, and I happened to be in the casuality at St Mary’s Abbott when Jimi Hendrix was brought in. The man had been dead some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital.” – Doctor Bannister
“He was not breathing. We started pumping his chest to do cardiac massage. We tried to turn him over and he was very stiff and I think the rigor mortis had already settled in,” reports Dr. John Bannister, the attending physician St. Mary Abbots Hospital near London. “None of us knew that it was Jimi Hendrix.”
JASON says: Both doctors confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival and dead for hours. There were no “phony CPR procedures”.
Moron HENDRIXGUIDE8721 believes Jimi can die from a massive overdose in the early morning hours and still be “alive” hours later to receive “CPR”. That’s how stupid he is. Plus the autopsy report confirmed Jimi died in the early morning hours with rice still left in his stomach. These hoaxers like HENDRIXGUIDE8721 attempt to discredit documented medical evidence for their bogus made up fantasy scenarios.
The fact of the matter is, this is documented on Jimi’s official record and these hoaxers and trolls will never be able to change it no matter how hard they try.
Jason says: “Hendrix was dead for hours which was told by 2 doctors in graphic detail that witnessed his decomposing corpse.”
Absolute nonsense.
So, you think that hospitals admit decomposing corpses into Casualty wards???
You need to re-think everything I’m afraid. You are believing absolute nonsense.
Again, DO SOME RESEARCH into the stages of death and the conditions under which people are admitted for resuscitation. You are waaaaay behind.
You are even associating Bannisters accouints with Hendrix, when the fraud said that he had a vivid memory that the body was over 7 feet tall! Jimi was 5′ 11″!
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Absolute nonsense.
So, you think that hospitals admit decomposing corpses into Casualty wards???
You need to re-think everything I’m afraid. You are believing absolute nonsense.
Again, DO SOME RESEARCH into the stages of death and the conditions under which people are admitted for resuscitation. You are waaaaay behind.
You are even associating Bannisters accouints with Hendrix, when the fraud said that he had a vivid memory that the body was over 7 feet tall! Jimi was 5′ 11″!
JASON says: It’s not “absolute nonsense”. You are a moron who refuses to understand documented medical evidence and testimony. You don’t even know anything about the Jimi Hendrix case. Do your research!
Jimi’s autopsy report determined he had a medium sized partially digested rice meal still left in his stomach. That means he died in the early morning hours, otherwise if it was 8 hours later, there wouldn’t have been any rice left in his stomach because the digestion process would have been long completed.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed was Jimi dead on arrival in their media press conference on 9/18/70
Both ambulance men said Hendrix was long dead when they were at the flat.
Dr. Brown said Hendrix died in the early morning hours and he came HOURS LATER to the hospital and “no revival was possible”.
Bannister confirmed the obvious rigor mortis on Jimi’s dead body from being dead for several hours.
All that evidence and testimony lines up perfectly.
Your ignorance is amazing. You ignore the testimony from the ambulance men and keep repeating your bogus claims.
Hendrix wasn’t “admitted” because he could be saved. He was taken to the hospital because the police told the ambulance men to bring him there. Since Jimi was taken there, by law, the hospital was required to make a “resuscitation attempt” even though Jimi was already dead. So Siefert pounded Jimi’s heart twice and that was it. You can’t save a man that’s been dead for hours. But you keep insisting he could be.
I’m not “associating Bannister’s accounts”. 5 other men confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival and was long dead at the flat. Bannister graphically described Jimi’s decomposing body which is normal for someone who died hours earlier.
6 men all confirmed the same exact thing and this was all documented nearly 51 years ago. All you’re doing is scrambling to find bits and pieces of contradicted claims to argue for your joke of a theory. Hilarious!
Reginald Jones Ambulance Man: “The body was on the bed….His tongue had fallen back. I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. The vomit was all dried. He’d been lying there for a long time. There was no heartbeat. He was blue, not breathing and not responding to light or pain. We called the police. A couple of young policemen turned up and they told us to take him to the hospital.”
Dr. Bannister: “On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”
Dr. Bob Brown: “Hendrix was brought into St Marys hospital in South Kensington. I was doing locum, and I happened to be in the casuality at St Mary’s Abbott when Jimi Hendrix was brought in. The man had been dead some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.”
Dr. Martin Siefert: “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.”
Lee Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s publicist: “Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival.
Bob Brown talking on radio 18/9/2020: “Up came an ambulance and out came a stretcher and on that was poor Jimi Hendrix. He was very clearly dead and had been for some time. There was nothing that could be done for him.”
Straight from the man himself.so if you have any doubts just read the above.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: these don’t apply to him” ???
So, one moment he says that Jimi appeared to dead for hours, then he says that the classic symptoms of some dead for hours (i.e. rigor mortis – livor mortis) didn’t apply to JImi! Obvioulsy Jimi hadn’t been dead for over two hours in that case.
So, your star witness doesn’t see this the way you do with your whacky idea that doctors take 8 hour stiffs into the Resuscitation Room. Hilarious! Infantile logic from you two. You obviously have no knowledge of human biology. Do some research.
JASON says: Sorry moron, 6 men that witnessed Jimi Hendrix on 9/18/70 all said he was dead for hours. They were there and you were not. This HENDRIXGUIDE8721 clown thinks a long dead body can receive CPR and be saved hours later LOL.
Reginald Jones Ambulance Man: “I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. He was covered in vomit. There was tons of it all over the pillow, black and brown it was. His airways was completely blocked all the way down. His tongue had fallen back you see. When we got him to the hospital we had to clean the ambulance out, it was really a mess, his bowels and bladder, all that goes when you’re dead.”
John Saua Ambulance Man: “We knew it was hopeless. There was no pulse, no respiration. We got down to the flat and there was nobody but the body on the bed, we had to radio for the police from the van, and we couldn’t touch anything in the flat. As I say we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed, but I didn’t recognize him. When we moved him the gasses were gurgling. You get that when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant. The vomit was all the way down. We couldn’t have got an airway down.”
Ian Smith Police Officer: “We went to a basement flat at Landsdowne Crescent. The ambulance men were there, but Jimi was dead. It wasn’t very pleasant. They had to take some of the bedding and wrapped it around his body as there was a lot of mess. There was really nothing they could do for him. I watched them put him in the ambulance and go off.”
Dr. Martin Siefert: “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.”
Dr. Bannister: “Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital. He was not breathing. We started pumping his chest to do cardiac massage. We tried to turn him over and he was very stiff and I think the rigor mortis had already settled in. On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”
Dr. Bob Brown: “Hendrix was brought in dead to St Marys hospital in South Kensington. He had been dead for some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
JASON says: So, all 6 men that officially witnessed Jimi Hendrix all said he was dead before he reached the hospital. Bannister graphically described the decomposing corpse and Brown backed it up with his confirmation that Hendrix was dead for hours. The troll HENDRIXGUIDE8721 attacks this documented evidence with invented bogus conspiracies cuz that’s what trolls always do.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Dr. Seifert (who was in charge and signed the Death Certificate) :
“We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead.”
JASON says: Dr. Martin Siefert confirmed on Jimi’s offical record that Jimi Hendrix was dead when he arrived and he did nothing for him. A years later new story he made up for a conspiracy theory documentary will never change his original and official documented statement.
Dr. Marrin Siefert: “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.”
JASON says: Dr. Siefert is on the official record stating Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and he only pounded his heart twice as the resuscitation formality. His official statement was corroborated by 5 other men both at the flat and at the hospital. A years later new made up story claiming “Jimi had some breathing and life” when years earlier he declared Jimi dead on arrival is an absolute joke. That’s why the confirmation of 5 other official statements debunks this bogus “Jimi had phony procedures performed on him at the hospital” hoax. HENDRIXGUIDE8721 is a total clown and looks more foolish every time he posts. His “star witness” debunked his own fake story. LOL
The Joker trying to rewrite history with more nonsense.
That’s the only thing trolls can do since actual history will always refute them.
Jason says: “Moron HENDRIXGUIDE8721 believes Jimi can die from a massive overdose in the early morning hours and still be “alive” hours later to receive “CPR””
Unbelievable. You STILL can’t understand that Jimi didn’t die of a massive overdose in the early morning hours! If he had died at 4 a.m. his body would’ve been heavily blotched with lividity at 11:45 and stiff as a board! ALL dead bodies go through this since the begininning of time you half-wit. Also, Reginald Jones said that the fire was on in the room where Jimi was found – get this – heat accelerates rigor mortis.
Again, the FACT that Jimi was taken hurridely to the emergency room (confirmed by Brown), the resuscitation room (confirmed by Seifert) PROOVES without a shadow of a doubt that Jimi can’t possibly have been dead for 7 or 8 hours as you and the conspiracy theorists ludicrously claim.
This HENDRIXGUIDE8721 has to the most stupidest person on the planet.
Do you have a reading comprehension problem? Are you unable to understand the written word? Can’t you understand what doctors are telling you?
Bannister is telling you that Jimi Hendrix was blotched with lividity. What the hell do you think a black rotting mouth and black mucous membranes are? That means Hendrix was dead for hours. He also said Hendrix was “very stiff” with rigor mortis. That means he was dead for hours. And you still can’t comprehend this information? Unfreakingbelievable!
“Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital.” – Doctor Bannister
“He was not breathing. We started pumping his chest to do cardiac massage. We tried to turn him over and he was very stiff and I think the rigor mortis had already settled in.”- Doctor Bannister
JASON says: You’re the one posting conspiracy theories trying to claim that Jimi Hendrix was still alive when he reached the hospital. Every man that witnessed Jimi’s body said he was dead for hours.
Everything Ivana and myself has posted is from the official record. The official record confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital. The hospital confirmed it to the press on 9/18/70 and all 3 doctors confirmed it in their official statements. You’re presenting an alternate bogus theory as you attempt to deny and lie about all the documented evidence that refutes you. What a clown!
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Also, Reginald Jones said that the fire was on in the room where Jimi was found – get this – heat accelerates rigor mortis.
JASON says: So, you admit Jimi was already long dead at the Samarkand.
Thank You very much! 👍
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Again, the FACT that Jimi was taken hurridely to the emergency room (confirmed by Brown), the resuscitation room (confirmed by Seifert) PROOVES without a shadow of a doubt that Jimi can’t possibly have been dead for 7 or 8 hours as you and the conspiracy theorists ludicrously claim.
JASON says: And once again, you are too dumb to understand hospital protocols and what all 3 doctors confirmed on the official record. They ALL confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival. They never would have made official statements stating Jimi Hendrix was a DOA if that wasn’t the case. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival on 9/18/70. Hospitals don’t issue those statements at a press conference about a major rock star if it isn’t true.
By law, hospitals are required to resuscitate a person when they arrive in emergency even when they are dead. The “resuscitation” is just a formality to establish that the patient died and that’s what happened to Jimi Hendrix. And you are too dumb to understand that. Instead you ignore all the real documented evidence and push your bogus conspiracy theory. The undigested rice found in Jimi’s stomach proves he died in the early morning hours and Dr. Rufus Crompton confirmed that as well. And you ridiculously try to deny that documented medical evidence like a moron.
You are taking a years later made up new account by Siefert and using it for your conspiracy theory. Siefert is already on the official record stating Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed that at their media press conference on 9/18/70. Siefert can’t change his story years later for a conspiracy theory documentary when he already officially confirmed Jimi being a DOA on his official medical record. It doesn’t work that way.
Dr. Martin Siefert: “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.”
Dr. John Bannister: “On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”
Dr. Bob Brown: “Hendrix was brought in dead to St Marys hospital in South Kensington. He had been dead for some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.”
JASON: “no “CPR” was ever performed nor was Jimi ever in a position to be saved.”
An utter lie! When I see blatant lies being spouted, simply to try and win an argument. It’s pathetic.
Of course CPR, resuscitation was performed! What do you think they do in the Resuscitation Room? Play ping-pong?
Dr. Seifert:
“Jimi was rushed into the resus room”
“Dr. Bannister and myself were called to the Department as soon as he arrived.”
” My duty as a Medical Registrar was to try and resuscitate any patients coming in who were unconscious. We would have been giving him cardiac massage.
“We worked on him for a very short time, probably five to ten minutes.”
Dr. Brown:
“They were going the right way to the emergency department”
Even the fraud Bannister (who you belive) said he performed CPR on the patient. His Hendrix story was in fact about a different person – the 7 foot tall man.
Even the ambulance men used a respirator on Jimi, which is a basic pulmonary exercise of CPR. They then rushed Jimi to Casualty with full lights and sirens! You two think that Jimi was an hour stiff at this stage. Lunacy! Medical staff simply don’t rush to to resuscitation on 8 hour old blue stiffs. You two are hilarious.
Hilarious how this HENDRIXGUIDE8721 moron believes “CPR” can save a long dead corpse with completely blocked airways from dried vomit. There is no possible way to get air into the lungs with completely blocked airways. Plus Hendrix was already dead for hours so no “CPR” would have even worked. Reginald Jones confirmed Jimi was laying there dead for a long time in dried vomit. John Saua confirmed Hendrix was dead. He said it was “hopeless and nothing would have worked”. He also said “he couldn’t get an airway down”. So there was no possible way for “CPR” to have even worked. But this moron keeps insisting there was “CPR” when there wasn’t.
Not one doctor said there was “CPR”. They all stated Hendrix was dead on arrival and nothing was done for him. They never would have issued these statements if Jimi had “CPR” and was still “alive”.
Dr. Martin Siefert: “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.”
Dr. John Bannister: “On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”
Dr. Bob Brown: “Hendrix was brought in dead to St Marys hospital in South Kensington. He had been dead for some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.”
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Even the ambulance men used a respirator on Jimi, which is a basic pulmonary exercise of CPR.
JASON says: The ambulance men did not use a “respirator” on Jimi, you moron. They used an ASPIRATOR. That’s a completely different device. They were trying to suck out all the dry vomit that was completely blocking his airways. And it still didn’t work cuz there was too much vomit and Jimi was already dead. A person’s tongue doesn’t fall back unless they are dead. You have no clue about the Jimi Hendrix case at all and you make up totally false claims not even knowing what you’re talking about .
Reginald Jones Ambulance Man: “His airway was completely blocked all the way down, his tongue had fallen back, he was flat on his back you see. John ran up and radioed, got the aspirator too.”
John Saua Ambulance Man: “Well I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out with an aspirator. I mean the vomit was dry, and there was a hell of a lot of it. The aspirators in those days were all right but not like you have today, they couldn’t shift that lot. I mean we knew it was hopeless, nothing would have worked. The vomit was all the way down, we couldn’t have got an airway down.”
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: They then rushed Jimi to Casualty with full lights and sirens! You two think that Jimi was an hour stiff at this stage. Lunacy! Medical staff simply don’t rush to to resuscitation on 8 hour old blue stiffs. You two are hilarious.
JASON says: You’re the one who is hilarious and everybody is laughing at you. You have no clue about even the basics of the Jimi Hendrix case as you pretend to be an “authority” on the matter.
Jimi was already long dead as told by both ambulance men. Jones confirmed Hendrix was blue. A person’s bladder and bowels doesn’t spill out unless they are long dead. By law they were required to work on Jimi even though he was already dead and at the hospital too. But you’re too ignorant to understand what these men are telling you. Also, Jimi wasn’t “rushed to the hospital in an emergency situation”. Reginald Jones confirmed that the police told them to take Jimi’s dead body to the hospital, so they did. And by law they were required to work on Jimi even though he was already dead. And once again, you’re too ignorant to understand simple statements from these men written in simple English.
John Saua Ambulance Man: “An ambulance crew by law just has to keep on working on him until we get him to hospital. It’s our job to keep trying till we get him to hospital, we can’t proclaim him dead. As I say, we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed, but I did not recognize him. When we moved him, the gases were gurgling, you get that when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant.”
Reginald Jones Ambulance Man: “I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. The body was on the bed, covered in vomit of all colours, black, brown, all over him, all over the pillow. The vomit was all dried. He’d been lying there for a long time.
We felt his pulse between his shoulders, pinched his earlobe and nose, showed a light in his eyes, but there was no response at all. There was no heartbeat. He was blue, not breathing and not responding to light or pain. See, we just have to keep working on him and we did. We called the police from the radio in the ambulance. A couple of young policemen turned up and they told us to take him to the hospital.”
JASON says: Reginald Jones confirmed Jimi was blue and dead for a long time laying in dried vomit. Vomit doesn’t dry up unless it was there for several hours. Hendrix did not respond to anything proving he was dead. Jones confirmed the police told them to take Jimi’s dead body to the hospital. It wasn’t because they thought Hendrix could be saved in an emergency situation. Also, Bannister confirmed both lividity and rigor mortis. So we have two confirmations of Jimi Hendrix being confirmed for many hours both at the Samarkand Hotel and at St. Mary Abbots Hospital. So once again, another bogus conspiracy theory is easily debunked and buried in the conspiracy theory graveyard.
Reginald Jones Ambulance Man: “I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. The body was on the bed, covered in vomit of all colours, black, brown, all over him, all over the pillow. The vomit was all dried. He’d been lying there for a long time.
We felt his pulse between his shoulders, pinched his earlobe and nose, showed a light in his eyes, but there was no response at all. There was no heartbeat. He was blue, not breathing and not responding to light or pain.”
Doctor Bannister: “Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital. He was not breathing. We started pumping his chest to do cardiac massage. We tried to turn him over and he was very stiff and I think the rigor mortis had already settled in.”
JASON says: And moron guide thinks a stiff blue corpse with a rotting mouth and black mucous membranes with no circulation through the body along with completely blocked airways from dried vomit is “still alive” to receive “CPR” in an emergency situation.
Freaking Hilarious!
Bob Brown said it himself on radio how much clearer does it need to be. Like we’ve both said over and over the resuscitation consisted of a few thumps to the chest as a mere formality in order to complete the paperwork nothing more. Dr. Teare’s autopsy results said it all.
Our old friend was fixated on Dr. Bannister and the imaginary wine he pumped out of Jimi our new friend is equally fixated on resuscitation attempts and procedures that amounted to a few minutes. Sounds like something out of a James Bond movie with these heroic doctors rushing around frantically trying to rescue and save someone who was beyond help.
You two obviously had learning difficulties at school. Time to learn.
Whatever you say here, is of no importance because if Jimi had been dead for 8 hours he would have exhibited rigor mortis/livor mortis, thus:
1 – The ambulance men wouldn’t have tried using a respirator at the flat.
2 – The ambulance wouldn’t have travelled with lights and sirens (never done with long-dead bodies on board – hilarious! – what would be urgent?)
3 – On arrival, the doctor(s) who looked at Jimi in the ambulance wouldn’t have triaged him into Emergencies. If dead for 8 hours, he would have been seen as DOA and sent directly to the morgue). He was pronounced dead in the Resuscitation Room – you know, where they play ping-pong or try to revive cadavres XD
4 – He wouldn’t have been rushed to the Resuscitation Room (doctors NEVER try and revive 8 hour old stiffs (rigor mortis/livor mortis always evident).
Don’t forget also that Bannister was describing a 7 foot tall dead body that he had treated 20 years prior (and not Jimi Hendrix, who was 5’11”).
You can continue to ignore the facts of medical science (including the FACT that alcohol, barbiturates, amphetamines, canabis and sleep ALL slow down rice digestion) and continue to appear stupid to your heart’s content.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 is just like Buster. They both ignore the facts and repeat the same bogus conspiracy theories over and over again. This is absolutely ridiculous.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Whatever you say here, is of no importance because if Jimi had been dead for 8 hours he would have exhibited rigor mortis/livor mortis, thus:
JASON says: What you’re saying is of no importance. Jimi did exhibit rigor mortis, you moron. Bannister fully described Jimi’s dead body showing rigor mortis. How more clear do we need to make this for you?
Doctor Bannister: “Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital. He was not breathing. We started pumping his chest to do cardiac massage. We tried to turn him over and he was very stiff and I think the rigor mortis had already settled in.”
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: The ambulance men wouldn’t have tried using a respirator at the flat.
JASON says: Once again, the ambulance men did not use a “respirator” at the flat. They used an ASPIRATOR which is a totally different device. Are you really this dumb?
Reginald Jones Ambulance Man: “John ran up and radioed, got the aspirator too.”
John Saua Ambulance Man: “Well I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out with an aspirator.”
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: He wouldn’t have been rushed to the Resuscitation Room (doctors NEVER try and revive 8 hour old stiffs (rigor mortis/livor mortis always evident).
JASON says: Jimi was already dead at the flat. By law they were required to work on Jimi even though he was already dead. But you keep ignoring this fact.
John Saua Ambulance Man: “An ambulance crew by law just has to keep on working on him until we get him to hospital. It’s our job to keep trying till we get him to hospital, we can’t proclaim him dead. As I say, we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed, but I did not recognize him. When we moved him, the gases were gurgling, you get that when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant.”
Reginald Jones Ambulance Man: “I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. The body was on the bed, covered in vomit of all colours, black, brown, all over him, all over the pillow. The vomit was all dried. He’d been lying there for a long time. There was no heartbeat. He was blue, not breathing and not responding to light or pain. See, we just have to keep working on him and we did. We called the police from the radio in the ambulance. A couple of young policemen turned up and they told us to take him to the hospital.”
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: On arrival, the doctor(s) who looked at Jimi in the ambulance wouldn’t have triaged him into Emergencies. If dead for 8 hours, he would have been seen as DOA and sent directly to the morgue). He was pronounced dead in the Resuscitation Room – you know, where they play ping-pong or try to revive cadavres XD
JASON says: Jimi Hendrix was seen as a DOA. He was pronounced dead on arrival because he was already dead at the Samarkand Hotel. You’re too dumb to understand that. Bannister said Hendrix was dead on admission. That is a DOA. Brown confirmed it too.
Reuters 9/19/70: “Hendrix, 27, was found dead of an apparent drug overdose in a London apartment. Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.”
Dr. Bannister: “On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”
Dr. Bob Brown: “Hendrix was brought in dead to St Marys hospital in South Kensington. He had been dead for some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.”
Reginald Jones Ambulance Man: “I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. The vomit was all dried. He’d been lying there for a long time.
We felt his pulse between his shoulders, pinched his earlobe and nose, showed a light in his eyes, but there was no response at all. There was no heartbeat. He was blue, not breathing and not responding to light or pain.”
JASON says: St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi dead on arrival and so did Dr. Bannister, Dr. Brown and Ambulance men Reginald Jones and John Saua. Moron guide has been easily refuted once again.
Here’s an article from 1970 that I posted about 2 years ago to debunk the “imaginary wine” nonsense that “Buster” aka Brian Doyle was pushing. This is an excellent article to use again to debunk the “phony CPR” procedures that HENDRIXGUIDE8721 is peddling.
This is a Reuters article that was published the day after Jimi died on the 19th which allowed them to get more facts regarding Jimi’s death. This article was run in major newspapers all across the United States. So there is no way major newspapers would run an inaccurate story about a major rock star’s death. They got the facts directly from the police and St. Mary Abbots Hospital.
What’s most important in this article is the second line: “Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.”
It clearly stated Jimi Hendrix was pronounced dead on arrival and it was confirmed by the attending doctors. The attending doctors were: Brown, Bannister, and Siefert. They all confirmed Hendrix dead on arrival. They said nothing about phony “procedures” or fake “CPR treatments” or that Jimi was still “alive”. They all said Jimi was dead on arrival which is documented on Jimi’s official record. Then decades later they want to change the story and the actual events of Jimi’s death. If Jimi was still “alive to get phony procedures” they would have stated that in 1970.
Now look at the 8th line in this article: “Hendrix, 27, was found dead of an apparent drug overdose in a London apartment rented by 23-year-old Monika Dannemann.”
It clearly confirms Jimi was found dead at the Samarkand. Who found Jimi dead? Reginald Jones and John Saua found Jimi dead of a drug overdose. And what does that mean? It means Jimi was declared dead on arrival since he was already dead at the hotel. A dead man can’t come back to life, only in a science fiction movie, but real life is not science fiction.
Jimi being dead at the Samarkand Hotel makes him dead on arrival at the hospital. Which also means no CPR was ever performed on Jimi Hendrix for an emergency situation because he was already dead. That was confirmed by Siefert, Bannister, and Brown on 9/18/70. But decades later Bannister and Siefert decided make up fake stories about Jimi’s death. Those fake stories are irrelevant because the real documented evidence and event can never be changed. Hilariously HENDRIXGUIDE8721 wants to claim Jimi was alive to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital when he already told us Jimi was dead “but not really dead”. That’s a science fiction conspiracy theory folks!
Drug Overdose Kills Rock Idol Hendrix
September 19, 1970
London (Reuters) – American rock star Jimi Hendrix died yesterday of an overdose of drugs, a spokesman for St. Mary’s Abbots Hospital announced.
Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.
“He was a good friend of mine and I will miss him,” singer Janis Joplin said when she told of guitarist Jimi Hendrix’s death in London Friday. And she cried.
Rock musicians across the country mourned the loss of a rare talent and brilliant guitarist.
“He was a innovator,” said Miss Joplin from a California recording studio. “He made everybody in the music business aware that the public was ready for and really wanted free musical expression. He showed that it really wasn’t delusion. It was reality.”
British musician John Mayall called Hendrix’ contribution “monumental”.
“The cat was definitely the main man,” said drummer Buddy Miles, formerly with Hendrix’ Band of Gypsies and now leader of The Buddy Miles Band.
Hendrix, 27, was found dead of an apparent drug overdose in a London apartment rented by 23-year-old Monika Dannemann, a beautiful German blonde.
Hendrix reportedly took several pills while suffocating on his own vomit according to hospital sources. A coroner’s officer took several blankets and some pills for analysis.
Police sources say the cause of death appears to be drug related. A post mortem examination was scheduled today, followed by a coroner’s inquest, probably Monday.
Eric Burdon, former lead singer with a group called The Animals and friend of Hendrix said: “All I know is that he had taken some sleeping pills.”
Burdon added that Miss Dannemann had found Hendrix in a coma and called an ambulance. She was taken to the hospital and put under sedation.
Hendrix made his last public appearance at a London jazz club Wednesday night. “We had been trying to contact him for three days but could not,” said one of the singer’s British agents. “It was very unlike him. He was usually very reliable.”
Hendrix, who featured wild music, swiveling hips and an unruly Afro hairstyle, once said he used drugs but outgrown them.
A year ago he told an interviewer, ” I tell you when I die I’m not going to have a funeral. I’m going to have a jam session. And, knowing me, I’ll probably get busted at my own funeral.”
This is so easy. News articles from LONDON on the day:
Peter Goddard (journalist): “A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”.
David Tune – The Daily Mirror, 19th September 1970: “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yeserday on the way to the hospital”
Evening Standard (18th September 1979): “Doctors…fought to save his life but all attempts to resuscitate him failed”
Let’s read that again kiddies: “A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”.
“A spokesman for the hospital”
Game over.
What you two are evidently incapable of understanding is the difference between dead and dead. Clinical death and Biological death. Bob Brown explained “the classic symptoms that a person has died… The body is no longer warm, and so on. And the person’s not breathing. And that doesn’t necessarily mean that you can’t resuscitate them.” THAT means clinical death, which is why Jimi was RUSHED to hospital and RUSHED to the RESUSCITATION ROOM.
When efforts failed, he was pronounced dead on arrival.
Got it yet? Or do I have to keep repeating all this until you do?
XD
Sorry moron guide, conspiracy theorists don’t count as a real source.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital gave a media press conference on 9/18/70 confirming that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and that is irrefutable. The entire world reported it. Dr Bob Brown issued the statement that day.
Dr. Bob Brown clearly stated Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and for several hours. But a moron like you is unable to comprehend what he told you.
Dr. Bob Brown: “Hendrix was brought in dead to St Marys hospital in South Kensington. He had been dead for some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.”
Dr. Bob Brown: “Jimi Hendrix was dead a many good hours before he was brought in to the hospital. Unfortunately, there was nothing I could for him as he aspirated vomitus from a barbiturate overdose. It wasn’t as if there was something to be done about Hendrix. There simply wasn’t…any medical remedy.”
Rolling Stone 10/15/70: “The ambulance rushed to the hotel on Landsdowne Crescent, in London’s Nottinghill Gate district, and took him to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital, where he was pronounced dead on arrival at 11:45 a.m., London time.”
Reuters 9/19/70: “Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.”
JASON says: The attending doctors at St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi dead on arrival. Those attending doctors were: Brown, Bannister, and Siefert. All 3 of them confirmed Jimi dead on arrival.
Game over.
Hi Jason, Don’t you just love it when someone comes along and tries to lecture us on what the truth is. Aspirated vomit is a killer as we’ve both said and Jimi certainly had that in droves. The doctors and ambulance attendants both saw it first hand, Jimi had it internally and all over himself. This in itself would have meant that Jimi was beyond any serious resuscitation attempt. Like Seifert said he hit Jimi in the chest just so he could establish time of death as there was no way of knowing Jimi’s actual time of death back at the Samarkand Hotel.
Hi Ivana,
Especially being lectured by someone who doesn’t even know the basics of the Jimi Hendrix case.
He keeps arguing the ambulance men gave Jimi CPR with a “respirator”. They never did that. They used an aspirator trying to suck out all the dry vomit but it didn’t work.
He also keeps saying Jimi was in an “emergency situation”. That is false. Both ambulance men confirmed Jimi was already dead and nothing could be done for him. They specifically stated that by law they were required to work on Jimi even though he was dead until they reached the hospital. They weren’t working on him because they thought he could be saved. They only took Jimi to the hospital because the police told them to take him there. But our “new friend” can’t understand that and ignores their testimony and repeats his lame conspiracy theory over and over.
Then he claims Jimi was “triaged” at the hospital for emergency procedures. That never happened. By law they were required to work on Jimi because he was taken by ambulance to emergency. When Jimi was hooked up to the monitor and it was flat and the doctors witnessed the rigor mortis, Siefert pounded Jimi’s heart twice as a formality and that was the entire “resuscitation procedure”. Bannister and Siefert both confirmed that and our “new friend” ignores the doctor’s testimony.
Ivana says: Our old friend was fixated on Dr. Bannister and the imaginary wine he pumped out of Jimi our new friend is equally fixated on resuscitation attempts and procedures that amounted to a few minutes. Sounds like something out of a James Bond movie with these heroic doctors rushing around frantically trying to rescue and save someone who was beyond help.
JASON says: Hi Ivana.
Don’t forget our old friend also tried to claim Jimi Hendrix was “still alive” to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital.
These conspiracy kooks say Jimi was dead at the flat, but not “really dead”, so he still can have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital when he was already brought in dead. The whole conspiracy is one total farce. Both of “our friends” ignore the facts and repeat their own debunked conspiracy theories over and over again.
A James Bond “B movie” it is with a poorly written script being circulated by tin foil hat kooks.
I’ve read that Jimi ate the rice between 11-12 pm at Kameron’s party. Dr Crompton said that it takes the stomach 3-4 hours to empty so Jimi would have died shortly after arriving back at the Samarkand Hotel. The fact the Jimi had a partially digested meal still remaining in his stomach confirms that Jimi wasn’t alive when the ambulance arrived to take him to hospital. Dr Bannister said that Jimi wasn’t admitted into the hospital from casualty but taken to the morgue. He also refuted Monika’s claim that Jimi should have been given a tracheotomy to save his life because Jimi was already dead and had been for some time. Dr. Seifert did what he had to do and that was a short thump to the chest nothing more as Jimi was beyond saving.
Stella Douglas and the party guests said Jimi ate rice in the 11 o’clock hour closer to midnight because they all were eating as well. Dr. Crompton estimated Jimi died no later than 4 am because of the evidence of rice found in Jimi’s stomach. That was documented in Jimi’s autopsy by Dr. Teare.
Our “new friend” wants us to believe Jimi died over 8 hours later inside the hospital. His bogus conspiracy theory is easily debunked because no rice would have been detected in Jimi’s stomach since the digestion process would have already been completed hours ago. So his phony theory goes up in flames.
All 3 doctors, 2 ambulance men, and a cop are all on the official record confirming that Jimi was dead at the Samarkand and when he arrived at the hospital. That makes him dead on arrival. All 3 doctors said Jimi was dead on arrival. Bannister confirmed the “resuscitation attempt” was a formality which was only the pounding of Jimi’s heart twice as Siefert did and confirmed himself.
Also, none of these “phony procedures” are documented on Jimi’s official hospital record which means it never happened. Everything that is done for a patient is always documented. The fact that nothing exists confirms these decades later false claims are just a crock.
And common sense tells you when someone died early in the morning they still can’t be alive 7 hours later to receive “CPR” at a hospital. Plus every person associated with Jimi that day said he was dead for hours. But tin foil hat kooks want to change the real event into their own phony narrative and argue for a lost cause. They will always lose on the documented medical facts.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: What you two are evidently incapable of understanding is the difference between dead and dead. Clinical death and Biological death. Bob Brown explained “the classic symptoms that a person has died… The body is no longer warm, and so on. And the person’s not breathing. And that doesn’t necessarily mean that you can’t resuscitate them.” THAT means clinical death, which is why Jimi was RUSHED to hospital and RUSHED to the RESUSCITATION ROOM.
When efforts failed, he was pronounced dead on arrival.
Got it yet? Or do I have to keep repeating all this until you do?
XD
JASON says: Yes, please proceed with this. It only makes you look like more of a moron and it provides the readers with more comedy entertainment.
Jimi was found dead on the bed. Reginald Jones said Jimi was dead for a long time. Bannister graphically described Jimi decomposing with a black rotting mouth and black mucous membranes indicating he was dead for hours. And you want to claim Jimi still wasn’t dead? Of course the effort failed, because Jimi was dead for hours and the “resuscitation attempt” was only a formality. They weren’t doing it to save Jimi’s life. They did it to confirm he was dead since he was brought in to the hospital.
Dr. Bob Brown confirmed that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and died in the early morning hours of a drug overdose and “no revival was possible”. You are claiming Jimi was “still alive” (not officially dead) to have phony “CPR procedures” performed on him in an emergency situation at the hospital.
Here is what Dr. Brown confirmed:
“Hendrix was brought in dead to St Marys hospital in South Kensington. He had been dead for some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
So, tell us and the readers how it’s medically possible for Jimi to have died several hours earlier who is cold, blue, with a black rotting mouth and black mucous membranes, and not breathing for several hours to be “resuscitated” several hours later in an emergency situation?
Hi Jason, I’ve said this before we are no novices in this story. Tin foil kooks are good at manipulating the facts that nothing they say resembles the truth or makes any sense. That’s how their minds work. They just end up looking like fools. Having seen a close relative pass away the body goes cold and turns white very soon after death. So a body having passed away several hours earlier would have been in a terrible condition just like the doctors said. They wouldn’t have any reason to lie.
Hi Ivana,
That’s why we easily debunk all these ridiculous conspiracy theories.
Our “new friend” is making up a lame excuse for clinical/biological death so he can say Jimi was “still alive” to have phony procedures performed on him. That’s the same tactic Buster used for all the b.s. he ranted about. Our “new friend” looks like a damn fool trying to argue that nonsense when everybody who witnessed Jimi that morning is on the official record stating he was dead for hours.
Tin foil hatters present a phony alternate reality by changing all the facts hoping to confuse people and suck them into their web of lies.
Our “new friend” says Jimi was dead at the flat right before the ambulance men arrived but not officially dead. But by the time Jimi reached the hospital, there is no way he would still be alive not breathing for nearly 20 minutes. Nobody can be revived after being dead for that amount of time. That’s why his phony theory is asinine.
2 ambulance men, a cop, and 3 doctors all confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival and dead for hours. All of them never would have confirmed that if it wasn’t the case. Plus St. Mary Abbots Hospital never would have told the media that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival if that wasn’t true. Those are the facts and it can’t be refuted because it happened almost 51 years ago.
Like I’ve said hundreds of times now, all these documented facts and evidence can never be changed because they are part of history. Phony stories and claims decades later will never be able to change a real life event that happened from nearly 51 years ago.
Have you noticed how tin foil hatters need support and attention to thrive but once their conspiracies/lies are challenged and disputed they fall by the wayside.
Interesting that Monika was the only one to mention wine maybe in an attempt to make it look as if the Vesparax was not the only cause of Jimi’s death. She also mentioned that Jimi died as a result of not getting enough air because the amount of pills Jimi took was not fatal according to her. What she failed to add was that the Vesparax Jimi took caused his death; he chocked to death because of the toxic level of barbiturates in his system.
That’s their modus operandi.
Tin foil hatters like “Buster” aka Brian Doyle post comments under different names on the same site so it appears he has support for his hoax. To the occasional observer, it would appear his phony theory has some support if there are other “names” supporting it, when in reality it was just Brian posting under different names to run his scam. He did that here as well posting under the name “FlySwatter” to make it appear he had support, when in reality, it was just “Buster” posting and agreeing with himself making it look like he had support from other people. That’s what a total clown “Buster” is. It was totally obvious it was him based on the same writing style he writes with. Not only that, a moderator on another website confirmed that “Buster” and “Flyswatter” was the one and only Brian Doyle. There isn’t too many people in the world that would be stupid enough to parrot the same exact nonsense word for word as he does.
Tin foil hatters push their conspiracies based on a script that they know all the answers to because they made up all the lies themselves. Their goal is to get you to argue the nonsense they are pushing and they use their own made up stories as claimed “evidence” that doesn’t even exist. Once you start laying down the facts and use evidence of the real case, their hoax falls apart because they don’t have anything to refute you with and they have no real answers for their exposed lies. As a result, they start becoming aggressive which quickly turns to anger and then they start attacking you. When they become really desperate, we will see them attacking the documented evidence and all the experts who presented solid testimony as they push their debunked conspiracies. We’ve seen that here with “Buster” and now with HENDRIXGUIDE8721 doing the same exact thing. These people are no different, they run the their bogus hoax based on lies with no real evidence and all operate the same way.
Monika was just trying to make up anything she could so she wouldn’t be accused of killing Jimi with her pills. She did mention wine and then Bannister in 1992 came up with the fake wine story because he thought he was going to get sued for malpractice after Monika accused him of not performing a tracheotomy. He read that in Electric Gypsy. Then all the fraudsters and hoaxers made up new phony wine claims ever since. Reading some of these new articles on Jimi’s death, they falsely report that Jimi died from a “large amount of alcohol” and basically don’t even state that barbiturates is what killed him. There was no “large amount of alcohol” detected on or inside the body of Jimi Hendrix but they latched on to that myth. Those authors who write those inaccurate stories do it just so they can get more clicks and they don’t care that are putting out false debunked information.
Hi Jason, All part of the deception. Spot on about the wine hoax, this was absent from any of the biographies and articles written close to Jimi’s death. False stories should nipped in the bud before they take hold and gain a following. Hoaxers need as many people to believe what their saying otherwise their myths go no where.
Hi Ivana,
Yes, all these fake conspiracies need to be refuted right away.
That’s why the “King of Hoaxers” spent 12 years pushing his hoax on every site possible trying to get people to believe in his hoax. From what I’ve seen from the reactions of other people, it seems the only agreement he received was from his own pseudonyms agreeing with himself LOL.
I was reading through some of the old comments and I noticed my first post here was today on July 18th. I forgot about some of the nonsense “our friend” wrote on here. When you read it all over again, it’s absolutely hilarious and no normal sane person could ever come up with such ridiculous conspiracy theories.
Hi Jason, Our friend was always good for a laugh. I hope he’s happy in the Happy Acres Mental Hospital built especially for conspiracy theorists, and I wish I knew what room he is in so I can send flowers. 😁
The doctors there give him imaginary red wine to take with his pills. 🤣
And he slept happily and peacefully ever after. LOL
This one is hilarious!
Buster the clown claimed for years that Michael Jeffery “murdered” Jimi Hendrix with wine because he believed Tappy Wright’s made up story.
Then when I pointed out to Buster that it was impossible for Michael Jeffery to “murder” Hendrix with wine because Jeffery was in Spain that morning, he changed his entire phony theory to “Jeffery only arranged it”. So, he refuted his entire premise of his phony murder caper. And he never did tell Ivana who “murdered” Jimi since Jeffery wasn’t there.
How can it “not matter” when Buster for years claimed Jeffery was waterboarding Jimi? That was his main part of his hoax. Jeffery not being there destroys his main argument and Buster knew it.
The guy is a total kook, and like all hoaxers, when you nail them on their lies they will invent a brand new story so they can carry on with their hoax like Buster did below.
BUSTER says: Jeffery had waterboarded Jimi to death with wine….
BUSTER says: In the long-run whether Jeffery was actually at the Samarkand or not doesn’t matter. He arranged the whole thing and probably told Tappy Wright he was there in order to cover for accomplices involved in a much deeper intel plot.
That’s how we can tell all of this stuff was coming from Buster’s over active imagination because he kept changing the plot at will and when it suited his needs. Even Tappy Wright admitted he made the whole murder plot up but Buster just couldn’t let go of it. Buster’s story just became unbelievable and ridiculous and he slowly dug his own grave; there’s just so much you can keep adding to a plot before it starts to resemble a fairytale.
He made up most of it as he went along. What destroyed his hoax was when I got him to say that Jimi wasn’t forced drowned in wine. He never recovered from that.
Jason says: “… then Bannister in 1992 came up with the fake wine story…”
The riduculous fraud Bannister’s story is weird because he said that he had a “vivid memory” of it and that very clear memory mentions that the body of the guy he worked on was “…hanging over the table we had him on by about ten inches.” If he had invented a story, surely he wouldn’t have made such a mistake about Jimi’s height. It would seem therefore that he was in fact describing a real case which had nothing to do with Jimi.
As doctors in Casualty, they would’ve seen hundreds of overdose/intoxication casualties coming in. Thinking back to a case 15 to 20 years old would not be an exact science, especially as the doctors had no idea at the time that a rock celebrity had passed through the ward. If someone asked me about what I did at the office on a day 20 years ago, I’d be lost. So, perhaps in his desperation to bolster his own image when he was facing trial for fraud, Bannister searched his (“vivid”) memory and brought in the memory of a different casualty.
We can’t forget that “Buster the clown” was another hoaxer that wanted Jimi to “still be alive” to have “phony procedures” performed on him at the hospital when before he admitted Jimi was dead for several hours.
I like how this serial hoaxer changed his fake stories after his original one was debunked by me.
First he said Bannister “removed a plug of vomit” and out gushed the imaginary wine.
Then he changes his story saying Bannister “never saw the “hard plug of vomit” and Siefert and the nurses removed it before Bannister arrived on the scene.
So he changes his fake stories with ease from one post to the next.
Buster aka Brian Doyle is a joke and so is this “Jimi was still alive to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital” hoax because Jimi was officially certified to be dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbots Hospital. There were never any phony procedures performed on Jimi Hendrix.
BUSTER says: Dr Bannister specified that he removed a plug of vomit from Hendrix’s windpipe and the wine then gushed out.
BUSTER says: Bannister never saw the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat because Siefert and the nurses removed it before he got to the scene.
Just proves what we’ve been saying all along don’t trust anything a tin foil hatter says or writes. They have an agenda and that is to fool as many people as possible into believing their fantasies.
Read something funny about Brian Doyle:”Brian Doyle is a great guy if you want to take that flat earth trip. Tickets selling now. The certifiably insane get 5% off.” 😂
Does all of Brian Doyle’s multiple personalities get the discount offer too? LOL
JASON SAYS: ” Jimi was officially certified to be dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbots Hospital. There were never any phony procedures performed on Jimi Hendrix.”
I’m afraid that is incorrect. For Jimi to have been certified DOA, that would have been certified by the doctor(s) who saw him in the ambulance. If they confirmed that he was DOA at that moment, he would have been sent directly to the morgue and not into Casualy, then the “Emergency Room” (as confirmed by Dr. Bob Brown), the Resuscitation Room (as confirmed by Dr. Seifert). ONLY patients that have just died are taken to the resuscitation room (for resuscitation – get it?). ONLY casualties (!) that are between life and death are taken to the resuscitation room, to Emergency rooms. Why on Earth would they take an 8 hour old stiff cadavre into the resuscitation room? Do you believe in Dr. Frankenstein? Father Christmas too?
After working on Jimi for “about 10 minutes” (a long time, time it), he then abandoned resuscitation proceedures.
So there we have the absolute proof that Jimi hadn’t been dead for 8 hours as you maintain.
Why would an ambulance rush an 8 hour old dead body to Emergencies? Then you say ‘how do you know that Jimi exhibited rigor mortis?”. ALL dead bodies exhibit rigor mortis, which begins after 30 minutes of brain death. You want Jimi to be the first human being in existence NOT to exhibit rigor and livor mortis. Hilarious. You’re as slow or stubborn as Buster in not understanding this.
Actually it’s you who still doesn’t get it.
Attending doctors Brown, Bannister, and Siefert confirmed to the media on 9/18/70 that Jimi Hendrix was a DOA. That was reported by Reuters on 9/19/70.
That afternoon, on 9/18/70 with Dr. Bob Brown as a spokesman for the medical staff, he told the media Jimi Hendrix was declared dead on arrival and it was from a drug overdose. That was then reported by every major news service in the world.
Jimi’s publicist Les Perrin also confirmed to the media that Jimi Hendrix was certified to be dead on arrival. That is documented on Jimi’s official medical record. A hospital doesn’t certify a person to be dead on arrival unless they are.
And below that, both Bannister and Reginald Jones describe the rigor mortis.
Dr. Rufus Crompton also confirmed Jimi died no later than 4am due to the rice that was detected in the autopsy.
Jimi Hendrix was dead at the flat. He was taken to the hospital because the police told the ambulance men to, not because they thought Hendrix could be saved to get CPR. He was already dead.
Dead at the flat means dead on arrival at the hospital. Even Brown said he died hours earlier. This is common sense stuff but you don’t understand it. I’m not going to argue about this with you anymore. You are like Buster aka Brian Doyle who said Hendrix was dead but magically came back alive to have phony “procedures” performed on him at the hospital. It’s ridiculous and asinine to even suggest that when all offical documentation confirms Jimi to be a DOA.
Reuters 9/19/70: “Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.”
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival” – Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s publicist.
Doctor Bannister: “Jimi Hendrix had been dead for some time, without a doubt, hours rather than minutes. He didn’t have any pulse. His body was cold and blue. The inside of his mouth and mucous membranes were black because he had been dead for some time. He had no circulation through his tissues at any time immediately prior coming to the hospital. He was not breathing. We started pumping his chest to do cardiac massage. We tried to turn him over and he was very stiff and I think the rigor mortis had already settled in.”
Reginald Jones Ambulance Man: I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. He was blue, not breathing and not responding to light or pain. See, we just have to keep working on him and we did. We called the police from the radio in the ambulance. A couple of young policemen turned up and they told us to take him to the hospital.”
“Hendrix was brought in dead to St Marys hospital in South Kensington. He had been dead for some time. He had died from an overdose, early in the morning, and this was quite a few hours later, so there was no revival possible.” – Dr. Bob Brown
Dr. Crompton: “Food usually remains in the stomach for less than four hours. Based on the post-mortem identification of whole rice grains in Hendrix’s stomach and reports that Hendrix ate rice sometime between 11 p.m. and 12 a.m, the conclusion is that Hendrix died no later than 4 a.m.”
In reply to Janon”s post above – I have already demonstrated here that statements to the press on the 18th from those responsable hospital turned up in the press and they show that Jimi hadn’t been dead for hours. Here they are again as it seems that you missed them:
Peter Goddard (journalist): “A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”.
David Tune – The Daily Mirror, 19th September 1970: “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yeserday on the way to the hospital”
Evening Standard (18th September 1979): “Doctors…fought to save his life but all attempts to resuscitate him failed”
As I have pointed out multiple times here, 8 hour old stiffs are NEVER admitted to Emergency wards! They go directly to the morgue. There is no escaping this fact.
As for the rice, I researched rIce digestion (have you?) and it is greatly slowed down by the consumption of barbiturates, amphetamines, canabis alcohol AND sleep. All of which concerned Jimi that night/morning.
I don’t give a shit what you pointed out, false reporting and conspiracy theories doesn’t make your conspiracy theory true.
Jimi Hendrix’s public relations manager confirmed Hendrix was a certified DOA. His word means more than some quack journalists.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi dead on arrival in their media press conference.
All 3 doctors confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival.
Jimi’s autopsy report confirms it as well.
That’s official documented evidence on Jimi Hendrix’s official record.
Anyway, I’m done arguing with an obvious troll.
I particularly like how Brian Doyle switches his phony stories from one website to the next when it suits him.
Here is Brian Doyle posting on a forum a decade ago under his famous alias “Scrum Drum” and then on here as “Buster” two years ago. See if you can spot his famous story changes about Bannister below.
Scrum Drum: Dr Bannister said the wine was put into a container but he doesn’t know what happened to it. Those things were handled by the nurses.
Buster: Dr Bannister disposed of the wine down the drain himself.
Buster: Dr Bannister and Dr Siefert disposed of the wine together.
Good detective work. I wonder why our friend can’t get his stories right could it be that they are all lies. Yes they are and it’s something we’ve known for years.
I read this on a YouTube thread today from Buster (calling himself Exiles800):
“They only suctioned the lungs because suctioning the stomach would be a waste of time in getting oxygen to the lungs…So since the stomach was never suctioned that is why Dr Thurston noted the wine that remained in it and Teare mentioned the full rice meal…”
Someone else corrected him:
Bannister said: “The medical staff used an 18 inch metal sucker to try and clear Hendrix’s airway…but it would just fill up with red wine from his stomach “. FROM HIS STOMACH!
Proof again that Buster simply picks and chooses from his own conspiracy theory nonsense and ties himself in knots.
Remember of course that Bannister was describing a totally different case (the 7 foot tall casualty).
Hi Jason, Good for you saying you’re not going to argue this nonsense anymore. We’ve dealt with this stuff already. 👎
Dr Teare mentioned the wine in Jimi’s blood and urine when he conducted the autopsy. Dr. Thurston never said that there was wine in Jimi’s stomach. There was a partially digested rice meal in Jimi’s stomach. That metal sucker Bannister was talking about could well have been reference to the aspirator the ambulance attendants used back at the Samarkand Hotel. When you start changing the original story, and what really happened to Jimi everything becomes confused and distorted. Tin foil hatters have a habit of throwing a spanner in the works, and it’s something they deliberately set out to do.
Yes we have and it’s getting ridiculous with this guy.
The autopsy report is enough to confirm Jimi died hours earlier. But then you have all the testimony from all the professionals, Les Perrin, the official hospital media confirmation, and all the media reports confirming Jimi was a DOA. And if you were alive on that day that’s the report you heard when Jimi’s death was reported over the news and in the papers. None of that can change nearly 51 years later when hoaxers decide to alter the entire event for their phony narrative. Not only that, when ambulance men and the police say he’s dead at the flat that means he’s dead at the hospital like the doctors confirmed. This business of Jimi was dead but not really “dead” is total b.s. and that’s the same tactic Brian Doyle uses to push his hoax even further. Then he makes up more nonsense just to have Jimi alive to have phony procedures. It’s damn stupid and it’s just a troll game as they continue to add more fake scenarios to the plot. These clowns always have to deny the overdose and that Jimi was officially dead at the flat, otherwise they can no longer push their debunked hoax.
It really is getting ridiculous with you two. It’s bad enough with Doyle.
JASON SAYS: “The autopsy report is enough to confirm Jimi died hours earlier”.
Not at all. I have demonstrated that the stomach contents (a fluid analysed under a microscope) are no indication that Jimi had been dead for hours before admission to the Emergency room.
JASON SAYS: “But then you have all the testimony from all the professionals, Les Perrin, the official hospital media confirmation, and all the media reports confirming Jimi was a DOA.”
I have just shown you the news reports that confirm that Jimi wasn’t long-dead on arrival.
Dr. Seifert was pressed by Glebbeek to make things clear about his two previous statements. Seifert confirmed that Jimi was in a life and death situation and certainly not long dead.
JASON SAYS: “And if you were alive on that day that’s the report you heard when Jimi’s death was reported over the news and in the papers. None of that can change nearly 51 years later when hoaxers decide to alter the entire event for their phony narrative. ”
The press reports that I posted here are official and from September the 18th 1970. A couple of hoaxers like you two can’t change the narrative no matter how hard you try. You have Doyle disease.
JASON SAYS: “Not only that, when ambulance men and the police say he’s dead at the flat that means he’s dead at the hospital like the doctors confirmed.”
Seifert confirmed that Jimi was between life and death. There was URGENCY to RUSH Jimi to the Emergency room and YOU think that Jimi was an 8-hour old body atthat stage? You have lost the plot.
Have you read Kathy Etchingham’s book and what it reveals about Dee Mitchell? About how Dee Mitchell orgnised the ambulance men’s interviews? What Dee Mitchell did before and after all that? It sheds doubt on the accuracy of the ambulance men’s stories. Ex Police Superintendant Dennis Care did his own investigation in the early 90s and he showed the published accounts to John Suau who immediately disowned them! He also stated that Jimi WAS still alive on arrival at the hospital.
JASON SAYS: “This business of Jimi was dead but not really “dead” is total b.s. and that’s the same tactic Brian Doyle uses to push his hoax even further.”
Hilarious, it is YOU and Doyle who are deluded enough to think that the medical teams would be in URGENCY mode with an 8-hour old stiff. All of you are waaaay behind on this case.
JASON SAYS: “Then he makes up more nonsense just to have Jimi alive to have phony procedures.”
The proceedures were real. Bob Brown confirmed that Jimi was rushed to the Emergency Room (never done with long-dead corpses of course). The hospital spokepersons confirmed that Jimi was alive on arrive (or died on arrival in the ambulance – as Suau later confirmed).
Dr. Seifert confirmed on film: “”When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead.”
And yet, like Doyle, you stand by the myth that Jimi had been dead for hours. Wake up.
This guy is really starting to annoy me. I have a feeling we are dealing with Buster again. What makes me laugh the most is that I thought wine was alcohol.
Hi Ivana,
This guy is an obvious troll most likely Buster the clown with a new alias. Way too funny. Just let him rant like a loon. Sad that he has to hide behind a fake name. He’s ashamed to even say it’s himself.
“The myth” of Jimi being dead for several hours has been documented on Jimi’s hospital and autopsy report since 1970, but I’ll let the official Jimi Hendrix website know you think he was still alive to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital. Maybe they will dedicate the homepage to you and get the autopsy report overturned because your conspiracy theory is the “truth”. HENDRIXGUIDE8721 will be famous just like Brian Doyle who also believes a several hour long dead corpse had life saving phony procedures performed on him at the hospital.
IVANA SAID: “Dr Teare mentioned the wine in Jimi’s blood and urine when he conducted the autopsy.”
No he didn’t. He only mentioned alcohol. Get your facts right.
IVANA SAID: “That metal sucker Bannister was talking about could well have been reference to the aspirator the ambulance attendants used back at the Samarkand Hotel.”
What is wrong with you? Read all the quotes from Bannister. He said he had a vivid memory of the casualty and that he was “very long” and that “He was about 10 inches (25.4 centimetres) longer than the trolley”. Hospital trolleys are at least 6’5″ inches long in order to support full-grown adults up to 6′ tall. This means that the body he worked on was over 7 feet tall! He wasn’t recounting the Hendrix case at all! Get it? This is why no other medical account/document mentions wine. Ignore fraud Bannister.
IVANA SAID: “When you start changing the original story, and what really happened to Jimi everything becomes confused and distorted.”
Absolutely, which is why one can only relay on the insecapable facts i.e. Jimi WAS definitely admitted to the Emergency room and resuscitation proceedures were performed, thus proving without a shadow of a doubt that he was in a life and death situation – there was URGENCY. If you think that an 8 hour old dead body would be in these circumstances then you’ve lost it.
Stop recounting Bannister’s nonsense. We are not interested in it or the rubbish about Jimi being alive when admitted to the emergency room. Read what Bob Brown said on radio it makes perfect sense. You need to be a little more discerning with the information you are reading and believing.
A SENSE OF URGENCY
– Ambulance personnel know the difference betwwen 8-hour old bodies (which ALL exchibit rigor mortis/livor mortis – meaning irretrievably dead) and someone who need assistance or immediate resuscitation. They tried to revive Jimi with a respirator, proving that they didn’t have a long dead stiff in front of them.
– The ambulance men said that they sped to the hospital with full lights and sirens. They obviously wouldn’t have done this with an 8-hour old cadavre. Proof that Jimi wasn’t long dead.
– On arrival, a doctor (or two according to admissions officer Walter Price) looked at Jimi in the ambulance and decided that he should be rushed into Casualty and the Emergency Room. This obviously wouldn’t have been done with an 8-hour old cadavre. Proof again that Jimi wasn’t long dead.
– Dr. Seifert confirmed that he worked on Jimi in the “rescus room” – the Resuscitation Room. Jimi wouldn’t have been taken there if he was an 8-hour old cadavre. Proof again that Jimi wasn’t long dead (unless you believe that doctors try and revive long-dead corpses – you evidently DO believe that and therefore aren’t even credible to comment on this case).
– That very morning, a hospital spokesperson told the press “…the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon” (journalist Peter Goddard recounted). Also, David Tune of the The Daily Mirror said (19th September 1970): “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yeserday on the way to the hospital”.
So it is clear that it wasn’t an 8-hour old blue stiff that had arrived at St. Mary Abbott’s Hospital.
By the way, Senator Bob Brown remembered this about JImi being rushed in (a sense of urgency!): “they kept going; they were moving. I just came along with the trolley, walked with it for a few steps and on it went.” They were going the right way to the emergency department”.
When quized by Aiden Prewitt about all this:
AP: “What are the signs that someone’s been dead for a bit?”
BB: “Well these don’t apply to him, because he was effectively my patient at the time. ”
Whaaat? “Well these don’t apply to him”???!!! because “…he was my patient at the time”???!!! WTF? He walks alongside the trolly for a few paces and that makes Jimi HIS patient at the time?? The signs of someone long-dead “don’t apply to him”???!!! WTF
So Bob Brown’s account, despites its incoherences in fact proves that Jimi wasn’t an 8-hour old corpse at that point! Got any other star witnesses that you want me to take to pieces?
LMAO
Hey everybody…Jimi Hendrix was alive to have “phony procedures” performed on him at the hospital because Paul Goddard, The Daily Sketch, and HENDRIXGUIDE8721 said so. 3 of the most amazingly credible sources that are officially on Jimi Hendrix’s official death account. LOL
Let’s not believe St. Mary Abbots Hospital who held a media press conference confirming that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival or let’s not listen to Les Perrin who was in charge of Jimi’s media relations to provide accurate information to the media even though that was his official job.
Let’s ignore Jimi’s autopsy report that showed him with a stomach full of rice (which would be fully digested 8 hours later) that proved he was dead no later than 4am.
Let’s also ignore both ambulance men and a cop that witnessed Jimi dead.
And ignore all 3 doctors who witnessed Jimi was dead as well.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 fully convinced me! Ivana, you better be convinced too.
Now HENDRIXGUIDE8721 can produce an official hospital document that states: the patient Jimi Hendrix was admitted alive and was still breathing to have CPR performed on him by the medical staff.
I want to make a copy of that to hang on my wall. Can you get one for me?
I’ll contact the official Jimi Hendrix website, show them your posts, and tell them you made this breakthrough discovery and we have you, Paul Goddard, and the Daily Sketch all to thank for this. Maybe Reuters and Rolling Stone magazine will print a retraction of Jimi’s DOA confirmation on Jimi’s 51st death anniversary.
You earned it dude! Hats off to you.
O.K, I’m convinced. 😂😂😂
I thought you would be! 🤣
I’m excited that HENDRIXGUIDE8721 is going to overturn Jimi’s official DOA confirmation. 50 years is way too long and it’s about time Paul Goddard, the Daily Sketch, and HENDRIXGUIDE8721 is honored with this most wonderful achievement of bringing us the “truth” about these “phony procedures” on a several hours long dead corpse.
Thanks HENDRIXGUIDE8721, you’re going to be world famous!
I don’t give a shit what you pointed out, false reporting and conspiracy theories doesn’t make your conspiracy theory true.
Jimi Hendrix’s public relations manager confirmed Hendrix was a certified DOA. His word means more than some quack journalists.
JASON SAYS:St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi dead on arrival in their media press conference.”
No they didn’t. Here AGAIN are the news reports on the day:
Henry Maule of The Daily Sketch said that Jimi “was found deeply unconscious at the home of a blonde girlfriend…”
Peter Goddard (journalist): “A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”.
David Tune – The Daily Mirror, 19th September 1970: “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yeserday on the way to the hospital”
Evening Standard (18th September 1979): “Doctors…fought to save his life but all attempts to resuscitate him failed”
JASON SAYS: “All 3 doctors confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival.”
Only the very young and inexperienced Bob Brown had that impression as he walked alongside the trolley for a few seconds. He also said that Jimi was rushed to the Emergency Room – which proves that Jimi was in a life and death situation. Long dead bodies NEVER get treated in that way, they go directly to the morgue.
JASON SAYS: “Jimi’s autopsy report confirms it as well.”
No it didn’t. It didn’t state the time of death at all. Don’t lie.
JASON SAYS: “Anyway, I’m done arguing with an obvious troll. It’s damn stupid and it’s just a troll game as they continue to add more fake scenarios to the plot. These clowns always have to deny the overdose and that Jimi was officially dead at the flat, otherwise they can no longer push their debunked hoax.”
It has nothing to do with trolling or hoaxing. It’s simply about underlining the truth which for some reason you and the conspiracy theorists can’t accept.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721, are you going to claim Les Perrin never spoke these exact words to the media regarding Jimi Hendrix’s death on 9/18/70? These words never went over the airwaves on 9/18/70?
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival” – Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s publicist.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721, I’m going to need a copy of Jimi Hendrix’s official hospital report that shows him alive and breathing to have phony procedures performed on him at St. Mary Abbots hospital since you say it’s the truth. I think Ivana wants one too. Do you want a framed copy, Ivana? I think if we are nice enough to HENDRIXGUIDE8721 he might autograph it for us.
Yes please I want a framed autographed copy. ASAP. I’ll but it on my bedside table so it’s the last thing I see before I go to sleep and the first thing I see in the morning. Yippee.
JASON SAID: “Let’s ignore Jimi’s autopsy report that showed him with a stomach full of rice (which would be fully digested 8 hours later) that proved he was dead no later than 4am. ”
This in itself shows how you haven’t grasped the facts.
The autopsy stated that there saw a “half-digested meal” in the stomach and it needed a microscope to analyse it to see what it was! That certainly isnt a “stomach full of rice” at all! Hilarious nonsense, trying to bend the facts to your own advantage.
Rice is broken down to chyme in the stomach and this is obviously what Teare found. Differing foodstuffs have varying digestion times but the pre-digestion process of rice in the stomach can be greatly slowed by various things: the composition of other foods in the stomach at the same time, the presence of alcohol and the ingestion of certain drugs (barbiturates, amphetamines, canabis, alcohol,… ALL of which Jimi had been consuming.
Sleep ALSO slows rice digestion. Do the reasearch, I did!
“a stomach full of rice” my ass! LMAO
“Differing foodstuffs”? 🤣🤣🤣
We have a brilliant medical expert here folks….”differing foodstuffs” is a latest technical term in medicine!
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 knows more than former world renowned pathologists Dr. Teare and Dr. Crompton on the digestion process.
This guy is hilarious!
Full of hot air and nothing else.If he’s not careful he’ll float away. LOL
Here’s an article from the Associated Press that ran in newspaper all across America and was broadcasted on AM radio stations during the news.
This article details the inquest that was held for Jimi Hendrix. The final result (as intelligent people know) was Jimi Hendrix died from suffocation due to barbiturate poisioning. Those were the exact words spoken by Dr. Teare. That clearly shows Jimi died from a lethal overdose and it was stated during the inquest. Nothing about imaginary wine was ever talked about since there wasn’t any wine or a phony “murder”. Also, when you read the last line in this article, it confirms Jimi Hendrix was dead at the Samarkand which makes him dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital. This also again, easily debunks the “phony procedures” hoax. Like I always say, real documented evidence will always destroy made up decades later fake claims because you can’t change events that already happened trying to change it to something else.
Associated Press
September 28, 1970
Open Verdict Given in Hendrix’s Death
LONDON, Sept. 28 (AP)—A London coroner returned an open verdict today on the death of Jimi Hendrix, after a pathologist testified that the rock star had died of suffocation.
The coroner, Dr. Gavin Thurston, said there was insufficient evidence to suggest that Mr. Hendrix had taken his own life. The coroner’s court heard medical testimony that the singer-guitarist had taken nine times the normal dose of sleeping tablets.
Prof. Donald Teare, a pathologist, said Mr. Hendrix, who was 27 years old, had died as a result of having swallowed vomit caused by barbiturate poisoning. He said there was no evidence that the singer was a drug addict.
Mr. Hendrix was found dead inside his German girlfriend’s hotel room on September 18.
Here’s a video that I found from 1974 where Jimi’s former associates discuss his death.
Eddie Kramer talks about Jimi and he states his death was accidental which we all know it was until hoaxers and fraudsters started with their bogus “Hendrix Murder Conspiracy Hoax” decades later.
Next we hear from two later fraudsters, known as the Allen Brothers who later became the “Aleem Twins”. They both discussed Jimi not using drugs until he made it big and when Jimi came back to the States they all used acid together. During this clip, they never mentioned the bogus “nap on the couch” story that Albert Allen made up in the 2010’s to make money for his crappy book. This would have been his ultimate chance to tell his “big story” of Jeffery and Monika planning evil deeds as he was waking up from a nap on the couch. We all know why he never told his fake story in this video. He never told it because he invented it for a “hook” in the book the Aleem Twins wrote a few years ago. His fake story never happened and this is just more proof of that. All these fraudsters made up fake claims decades later but never said a word about it in the 70’s. That’s how we all know this garbage is just made up to sell books just like Tappy “The Fraud” Wright did.
And finally, if you scroll down to the comments section, about a couple of comments down, you will see a familiar hoaxer still attempting to push his phony “murder” angle. Yes, that’s right, Brian Doyle aka Buster the Clown posted under another pseudonym and this one is known as Exiles800. He looks rather stupid still pushing his debunked hoax as this video on hard drugs totally refutes his fake murder claims. This hoaxing clown will never give up still always looking for people to take him seriously and searching for an audience to hoax. But nobody really does because he is a joke.
Nothing about imaginary wine here or a phony murder because it never happened, Jimi’s death was always about drugs. The fake wine and murder claims didn’t start until decades later and back in the 70’s people never talked about the conspiracy nonsense of today.
Report On Jimi Hendrix Death | Good Night America (May 1st, 1974)
Good Night America: Season 1; #3
Episode; Hard Rockers, Hard Drugs
Air Date: May 1st, 1974
The 1960’s were the years of hard drugs, hard rockers, and rock o.d.’s. We bring back on film such immortals as Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, and Jim Morrison. Live in the studio to talk about their drug experiences and the long hard road back were top recording artists.
Really enjoyed this. Fraudsters messed with the truth and facts so that Jimi’s death became trivialised nonsense so far removed from what really happened.
They were supposed to be Jimi’s friend and that’s how they treated him by ruining his legacy and making a mockery of his death all for a “hook” in their book. Disgraceful.
And the worst thing for me is that they wait until all the main players have passed away so that these fraudsters can’t be challenged on the rubbish they’re saying or writing.
Yeah that’s exactly what they do and it’s disgraceful.
Sharon Lawrence is a perfect example of that.
She made up a fake quote in her book claiming her colleague Jack Meehan told her in private regarding Dr. Thurston. Hoaxers then use this bogus quote for their wine scam. The fact is neither Meehan or Thurston can challenge her because Meehan has been dead for 48 years and Thurston has been dead for 41 years. So she is allowed to use a quote she made up that can’t be verified or sourced. Sharon Lawrence was guilty of making up fake quotes about Jimi’s mother and details of his life in her fiction book. So, we know Sharon is no stranger to making up outright lies in her book for dramatic effects for the reader which is what she did with Meehan and Thurston.
Nobody is going to buy a book based on Jimi Hendrix dying from a drug overdose because we all know that’s how he died. But when someone makes some outrageous claim with tabloid journalisim of a “murder” or sensational wine claim,
then there will always be an audience looking to read that garbage. That’s how new myths are born and conspiracy theorists capitalize on it by adding a new fake story for their hoax.
I’m no fan of Monika Dannemann, but it’s blatantly obvious Lawrence made up fake quotes about her as well. Lawrence claimed Monika was “moaning” into the phone for several minutes during her questioning about Jimi and said she admitted to pouring wine. So, Lawrence waited for a few years after Monika committed suicide to make these charges and accusations where Monika can’t respond to them. Let’s not forget that Lawrence made the asinine conspiracy theory charge that Jimi committed suicide based on his fascination with the occult and numerology with the number 9.
So, with that nonsense she debunks the bogus wine claim plus the phony murder conspiracy since she says Jimi killed himself by taking 9 pills. But these hoaxers only use the fake Meehan quote, Monika “moaning”, and the imaginary wine pouring for their “phony evidence” that Sharon Lawrence made up for her fiction book.
Not any of this is true, it’s just fraudster Sharon Lawrence making it up for her book. But her fake stories have done damage to Jimi and allowed conspiracy theorists to use her lies for their hoax. All they do is take bits and pieces of fake stories told by these fraudsters and wrap them all into one fake story they tell themselves. Then they push their hoax on the internet looking for an audience to believe it.
Totally agree about the Sharon Lawrence quotes. The problem with her and Kathy is that they both had an issue, an agenda as regards Monika.
This is very clear in Kathy’s book and she also recounts how she had been stalked, manipulated and ultimately slandered by Dee Mitchell, who she discovered had done similar things to others that had been in the Hendrix circle! Dee was the person who found the ambulance men 20 years after Jimi’s death and knowing that her prey wanted to nail Monika, it seems very likely that she pre-briefed ambulance men Jones and Suau to incriminate Monika and thus gain more favour with Kathy.
When Dee became estranged from Kathy, she then stalked Monika (!) and worked for her, again questioning John Suau. A letter exists where she explains to Monika that Suau changed his story evey time she talked to him! This throws into question the original ambulance men’s accounts that appeared in Kathy’s and Tony Brown’s books and have fuelled all this long-dead nonsense (along with Bannister’s and Tappy Wrights fantasies). Thus people (like you two and Buster) have been misled about the time of death all these decades).
Caesar Glebbeek contacted ex-Police Superintendant Dennis Care (who had interviewed Suau in the early 90s) and found out that Suau disowned what had been published in all the books! He even said that Jimi gasped his last breath as the ambulance arrived at St. Mary Abbotts (which fits the real event of Jimi being in a critical situation on arrival and RUSHED to the Emergency/Resuscitation Room – as two very credible doctors confirmed).
Hi Jason, For years Monika tried to distance herself from any blame for Jimi’s death as if she would then admit to pouring wine over Jimi and potentially causing his death. Sharon Lawrence just wanted to add the suicide angle because no-one else had hinted at it. Jimi wouldn’t have booked his ticket back to New York, and more recording at his studio if he intended to commit suicide on that date. You really need to be gullible to fall for any of this later stuff.
Hi Ivana,
Great point. Every story Monika told was to shield herself from any blame and she certainly wouldn’t admit something to Sharon Lawrence of all people after all that time. Jimi was going to do some live shows as well as finishing up his album. Sharon Lawrence needed a brand new tale in order for people to buy her fiction book. So, she made up quotes, altered Jimi’s life story, and invented a fake cause of death. All these fiction books have a “hook” which is a fake made up story.
Australian doctor – Dr Bob Brown – also bore witness to Hendrix’s death as he met the ambulance when it arrived at the hospital.
Speaking to Australian writer and filmmaker Aidan Prewett for the book Our Jimi, Brown also remembered Hendrix being rushed in on a trolley as “his lady friend was coming along behind”.
Despite their best efforts, Brown said there was nothing doctors could do to save the 27-year-old.
“He was dead and had been for some time,” Brown said, “I just came along with the trolley, walked with it for a few steps and on it went.”
Aidan Prewett’s new book Our Jimi is set to feature interviews with the friends, family and musical colleagues of Jimi Hendrix and will be out on September 18th.
Just another confirmation by Dr. Bob Brown stating Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival. Which is why St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi dead on arrival at their media press conference where Dr. Bob Brown was present issuing a statement. You can’t change an event that already happened 50 years ago into a phony alternate version 50 years later.
“He was dead and had been for some time” – Dr. Bob Brown
Looking forward to reading this book. Bob Brown has stuck to the same story over the years.
JASON SAYS:Just another confirmation by Dr. Bob Brown stating Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival. Which is why St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi dead on arrival at their media press conference.
> Peter Goddard (journalist): “A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”.
> David Tune – The Daily Mirror, 19th September 1970: “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yeserday on the way to the hospital”
> Evening News (18th September 1979): “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in London today after being taken to hospital suffering from an overdose of drugs” – “He was certified dead by a doctor who examined him in the back of the ambulance”
> Evening Standard (18th September 1979): “Doctors…fought to save his life but all attempts to resuscitate him failed”
So obviously Jimi nadn’t been dead for 8 hours.
As I said earlier, Dr. Bob Brown was very young and inexperienced at the time and the amount of time he say Jimi was about 10 seconds as he walked along with the trolley as it was being RUSHED to the Emergency/Resuscitation Room (which is only an occurence in Casualty wards when a patient is between life and death).
Brown also stated about the visible signs of someone who is long dead “Well these don’t apply to him” – “…because he was my patient at the time”. His patient at the time?? For 10 seconds as the trolley passed? And this is your star witness.
So your dear Dr. Brown has no credibility here and was obvious concocting bollocks to colour his book (and you fell for it).
During the inquest of Jimi Hendrix’s death, it was documented that Jimi was dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital on September 18, 1970 and no hoaxing troll can ever refute it since it’s etched in history forever.
Associated Press
September 28, 1970
Open Verdict Given in Hendrix’s Death
LONDON, Sept. 28 (AP)—A London coroner returned an open verdict today on the death of Jimi Hendrix, after a pathologist testified that the rock star had died of suffocation.
The coroner, Dr. Gavin Thurston, said there was insufficient evidence to suggest that Mr. Hendrix had taken his own life. The coroner’s court heard medical testimony that the singer-guitarist had taken nine times the normal dose of sleeping tablets.
Prof. Donald Teare, a pathologist, said Mr. Hendrix, who was 27 years old, had died as a result of having swallowed vomit caused by barbiturate poisoning. He said there was no evidence that the singer was a drug addict.
Mr. Hendrix was found dead inside his German girlfriend’s hotel room on September 18.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll doesn’t understand that he’s is making a complete fool out of himself. He destroyed his own “phony procedures” hoax himself with his own articles. Hilarious!
David Tune – The Daily Mirror, 19th September 1970: “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yeserday on the way to the hospital”
Evening News (18th September 1979): “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in London today after being taken to hospital suffering from an overdose of drugs” – “He was certified dead by a doctor who examined him in the back of the ambulance”
The first article states “Jimi died in an ambulance” and the second article states “Jimi was certified dead by a doctor in the ambulance”.
This confirms what Ivana and myself have been saying all along, that Jimi Hendrix was certified dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital and there was no phony CPR procedures. Let’s thank HENDRIXGUIDE8721 for making that abundantly clear with his own “articles”.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: So obviously Jimi nadn’t been dead for 8 hours.
As I said earlier, Dr. Bob Brown was very young and inexperienced at the time and the amount of time he say Jimi was about 10 seconds as he walked along with the trolley as it was being RUSHED to the Emergency/Resuscitation Room (which is only an occurence in Casualty wards when a patient is between life and death).
Brown also stated about the visible signs of someone who is long dead “Well these don’t apply to him” – “…because he was my patient at the time”. His patient at the time?? For 10 seconds as the trolley passed? And this is your star witness.
So your dear Dr. Brown has no credibility here and was obvious concocting bollocks to colour his book (and you fell for it).
JASON says: So, HENDRIXGUIDE8721 pathetically tries to discredit Dr. Bob Brown but he still hasn’t produced a hospital medical document that states “Jimi Hendrix was breathing and alive to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital”. Buster the clown aka Brian Doyle who argues the same bogus conspiracy theory, still hasn’t produced the document either because it doesn’t exist, since there was never any phony procedures performed on Jimi Hendrix.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 debunked himself with his own articles! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival” – Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s publicist
Jimi Hendrix’s publicist Les Perrin also confirmed to the media that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and backs up Dr. Bob Brown.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: So your dear Dr. Brown has no credibility here and was obvious concocting bollocks to colour his book (and you fell for it).
JASON says: This isn’t Dr. Bob Brown’s book, you moron. It’s Aidan Prewett’s new book called “Our Jimi”. Dr. Bob Brown was just being interviewed for it.
Take more time to read words written in simple English and spend less time trolling trying to push your debunked hoax. You’ve just embarrassed yourself again after you debunked your own phony hoax. Jimi Hendrix was certified dead on arrival just like the articles you posted states. Thank you very very much for that.
Hi Jason, Our new friend will soon go the way of our old friend-out the door.
Hi Ivana,
You are exactly right.
How dumb can he be? He’s posting articles that confirms Jimi was dead on arrival debunking his own conspiracy theory and he’s still trying to claim Jimi had phony procedures.
These hoaxers are so obsessed to push their scam that they don’t even realize what they are posting or claiming. They are a constant contradiction.
Hi Jason, We’ve said this before if Jimi took the Vesparax in the early morning and the ambulance was called at 11am how could someone survive a massive overdose and still be alive after all those hours. It just wouldn’t be humanly possible. I call into question Monika’s actions that morning what she actually should have done and obviously what she didn’t do. I’ve gone back and read what she had to say about her last night with Jimi back at the Samarkand Hotel. Monika claims she and Jimi were in bed talking about spiritual things and he urged her not to commit suicide if he were to pass away which is absolute rubbish since Jimi was found fully clothed on top of the bed having chocked on her pills. It’s almost as if she is trying to make Jimi’s death look less distasteful.
Monika was always making up new stories and adding to them. Jimi hardly knew her and she pretended they were soulmates that were in a long term relationship.
There’s no.way Jimi would be alive for all those hours after his OD. The lethal amount he took wouldn’t take long for him to OD.
There’s also no way Monika took a pill like she claimed at 7 and woke up at 10. She also claimed to have woken up at 9:00, 10:20, 11:00.
JASON SAYS: “There’s no.way Jimi would be alive for all those hours after his OD. The lethal amount he took wouldn’t take long for him to OD.”
Wow! This shows how little research you have done!
What you need to understand is that Jimi and Monika Damnation left the Samarkand at around 3 a.m. (according to Angie Burdon). They then visited Alvenia at the house where she was staying with Judy Wong. They then drove to Soho and had a drink in an all-night bar. They then dropped Alvenia at Ronnie Scott’s (Burdon was wrapping up there by that time – 4 a.m. ? 4:30 a.m.?). They then drove back to The Samarkand. So we’re getting towards 5 a.m.
When the police interviewed Monika on the 18th (at The Samarkand – after the afternoon “clean-up”) they found out that once Jimi and Monika got back to the flat, their arguing continued and Jimi had even left the flat for a while to cool off/escape the arguing. When he returned, he took a sleeping tablet. The police said this. So, dispute, the return, the calming down would push the timeline for the first pill to 5:30? 6:00? 6:30? We can’t be sure but it certainly wasn’t in “the early hours” of the 18th.
Then we have Monika saying that when the pill didn’t seem to work, she gave him “some more” (as recounted by her to Kathy, Mitch and Noel). This could push the taking of the by now lethal dose to 7 a.m.? 7;30? Also, even 4 pills would be enough to put someone in a critical state. Jimi was reputed to be very resiliant as far as drug use goes, so he was in a coma by 9 a.m. (simply not lond dead folks). Also, it has been recounted by Fayne and other girlfriends apparently that Jimi would sometimes have sleeping/choking problems and it is suggested that he suffered from the condition sleep apnea.
In the televised 2016 autopsy review, the renowned forensic pathologist Michael D. Hunter suspected that Jimi was suffering from a viral infection (the flu) and this would obviously have weakened him in his struggle.
So you can forget the outdated idea of Jimi taking 9 pills at 2 a.m. We have no idea how many pills Monika (or Jimi) took before the 18th anyway. All the police found was an empty box. Do want to believe Monika’s story of 9 pills? She even got her maths wrong, saying that she took a pill and the police found one by the bed.
LOL.
You are just making up a bunch of crap.
Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated Jimi died no later than 4am and he was one of the top pathologists in London.
You already debunked your own phony theory.
JASON SAYS: “You are just making up a bunch of crap.”
Bad news for you because all that comes from quotes from witnesses Angie, Alvenia and:
P.C. Smith: “From what we could gather, Jimi and the girl had had a bit of an argument and he’d stormed off to cool down. When he came back, he took a sleeping pill and went to bed.”
Doctors often confer in their assessments and diagnoses. Rufus Crompton was obviously innacurate in his assessment because we know for certain that Jimi hadn’t been dead for hours when the ambulance arrived as all these things happened:
– ambulance men use a respirator on Jimi (never done with 8-hour old cadavres)
– the ambulance took off with full lights and sirens (never done with 8-hour old cadavres)
– Jimi was seen in the ambulance by a doctor and it was decided that he should be rushed into Casualty for immediate resuscitation (never done with 8-hour old cadavres)
– Dr. Seifert stated that Jimi hadn’t been dead for hours when he tried to save him.
– Journalist Peter Goddard: “A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”.
Once again, HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll has no clue about the Jimi Hendrix case.
The ambulance men used an ASPIRATOR not a respirator. Jimi Hendrix was already dead at the flat. LOL.
Yeah HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll knows more than world renowned pathologist Dr. Rufus Crompton. LOL. Thanks for the laugh.
Bad news for you, because you already debunked your own phony theory with your own articles that confirmed Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival LMAO.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival in their media press conference and at the inquest so no hospital spokesman ever said “Jimi was alive”.
The witnesses made up all kinds of contradicting stories. The documented medical science debunks them. Jimi ate rice around midnight and the autopsy revealed a medium sized partially digested rice meal left in Jimi’s stomach which puts his death no later than 4am. This is forever on the official record. Your hoax is a joke.
Dr. Siefert already confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival and so did the hospital which was documented at the inquest. Sorry troll, you have nothing. Where is Jimi’s hospital medical record showing he was “alive and breathing” to have phony procedures? Oh yeah that’s right, it doesn’t exist because it never happened.
Dr. Crompton: “Food usually remains in the stomach for less than four hours. Based on the post-mortem identification of whole rice grains in Hendrix’s stomach and reports that Hendrix ate rice sometime between 11 p.m. and 12 a.m, the conclusion is that Hendrix died no later than 4 a.m.”
Dr. Siefert: “Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.”
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival” – Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s publicist.
Rolling Stone 10/15/70: “The ambulance rushed to the hotel on Landsdowne Crescent, in London’s Nottinghill Gate district, and took him to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital, where he was pronounced dead on arrival at 11:45 a.m., London time.”
Associated Press
September 28, 1970
Open Verdict Given in Hendrix’s Death
LONDON, Sept. 28 (AP)—A London coroner returned an open verdict today on the death of Jimi Hendrix, after a pathologist testified that the rock star had died of suffocation.
The coroner, Dr. Gavin Thurston, said there was insufficient evidence to suggest that Mr. Hendrix had taken his own life. The coroner’s court heard medical testimony that the singer-guitarist had taken nine times the normal dose of sleeping tablets.
Prof. Donald Teare, a pathologist, said Mr. Hendrix, who was 27 years old, had died as a result of having swallowed vomit caused by barbiturate poisoning. He said there was no evidence that the singer was a drug addict.
Mr. Hendrix was found dead inside his German girlfriend’s hotel room on September 18.
Drug Overdose Kills Rock Idol Hendrix
September 19, 1970
London (Reuters) – American rock star Jimi Hendrix died yesterday of an overdose of drugs, a spokesman for St. Mary’s Abbots Hospital announced.
Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.
Hendrix 27, was found dead of an apparent drug overdose in a London apartment rented by 23-year-old Monika Dannemann, a beautiful German blonde.
Hendrix reportedly took several pills while suffocating on his own vomit according to hospital sources. A coroner’s officer took several blankets and some pills for analysis.
Police sources say the cause of death appears to be drug related. A post mortem examination was scheduled today, followed by a coroner’s inquest, probably Monday.
Just finished reading what Dr. Crompton had to say about Jimi’s death. He says that the amount of Vesparax Jimi took was enough to kill him even if he hadn’t vomited. Dr Crompton also pointed out that Jimi couldn’t have been breathing when he reached the hospital because he had lungs full of fluid half a litre in one of them.
I pointed this out to our “old friend” and he claimed Jimi “didn’t take enough pills to overdose” lol.
Jimi took a lethal dose of Vesparax and the toxicity destroyed his liver returning a .7 lethal level of barbiturates. So, if he didn’t choke on his own vomit the barbiturate poisioning still would have killed him.
Jimi was not breathing when he reached the hospital. Both ambulance men, a cop, Brown, Bannister, and Siefert confirmed that. The fluid formed because Jimi wasn’t able to breathe and his heart was working too hard. Dr. Teare found that Jimi’s heart was dilated due to the OD. Wine trolls try to claim the fluid was “wine” but they also claimed Bannister sucked all the imaginary “wine” so no fluid should have even been there. Teare found no alcohol in the fluid either but they will still make the bogus claim.
Hi Jason, Jimi died because he took an overdose no-one can dispute that fact. His system shut down pretty quickly as he was found on top of the bed fully clothed. Normally people undress to get into bed so it’s obvious Jimi was unable to for a very good reason and it wasn’t because he was too tied; the effects of the amount of Vesparax he took caused the drowsiness. Unfortunately trolls have reworked this story so that now it is absolutely meaningless.
It’s what science dictates. A lethal overdose will kill a person quickly no matter what tolerance they have.
Trolls want to discredit documented evidence and medical science for their own phony alternate version making a mockery of Jimi’s death. Some of these fraudsters are making money off Jimi’s death with conspiracy videos.
Jimi died early in the morning and the autopsy confirmed it. This is the official record. No amount of trolling will ever change it.
Drug Overdose Kills Rock Idol Hendrix
September 19, 1970
London (Reuters) – American rock star Jimi Hendrix died yesterday of an overdose of drugs, a spokesman for St. Mary’s Abbots Hospital announced.
Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.
Hendrix 27, was found dead of an apparent drug overdose in a London apartment rented by 23-year-old Monika Dannemann, a beautiful German blonde.
Hendrix reportedly took several pills while suffocating on his own vomit according to hospital sources. A coroner’s officer took several blankets and some pills for analysis.
Police sources say the cause of death appears to be drug related. A post mortem examination was scheduled today, followed by a coroner’s inquest, probably Monday.
JASON says: St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi died from a drug overdose.
Attending doctors Brown, Bannister, Siefert told the media Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival.
Jimi was found dead at the Samarkand.
Jimi suffocated on his vomit at the Samarkand. He was dead and did not have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital.
All of this is documented on Jimi’s official record and was recorded as medical evidence at the inquest.
These fake alternate stories made up by HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll is a joke and is not documented evidence. These are phony conspiracy theories. He has no medical document that states “Jimi Hendrix was alive and breathing to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital” because none exists. It never happened. All he can do is use debunked quotes and make up phony claims.
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival” – Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s publicist.
“He was dead and had been for some time,” Dr. Brown said, “I just came along with the trolley, walked with it for a few steps and on it went.”
The post from ‘our friend’ 25th 3am is the funniest thing I’ve ever read. Just where did he get this information from. It certainly doesn’t exist in any of the biographies and articles I’ve come across. He has conveniently brought forward all the times to suit himself. What a joke! If Jimi hadn’t met up with Monika again and taken her pills then he would not have died on that particular day. Take the Vesparax out of the equation and there is no dead Jimi Hendrix. This emphasis and focus on times and phony procedures does not alter the fact that Jimi died on the 18th September, 1970 nothing will ever change that.
His “information” is all made up by himself. He’s trying too hard to push Jimi’s overdose as late as possible so he can claim “Jimi was alive to have phony procedures” at the hospital.
So, ‘our new friend’ says Jimi was in an all night bar drinking all morning, took Vesparax before the 18th, and claims 4 pills wouldn’t kill Jimi.
Sounds just like a hoax Buster would tell. It’s too ridiculous to even respond.
Tin foil hatters couldn’t care less about the facts. They can change the information because like you said Jason it’s all made up-it’s coming from their crooked little minds. 😳
Indeed. They have a clear agenda, suppress the real documented evidence and push their lies instead. That’s what all these hoaxers do.
IVANA SAYS:
“The post from ‘our friend’ 25th 3am is the funniest thing I’ve ever read. Just where did he get this information from. It certainly doesn’t exist in any of the biographies and articles I’ve come across. He has conveniently brought forward all the times to suit himself. ”
Nope. Again, it just shows how little you two have researched this case. It seems to me that all you have read is the woefully innacurate Tony Brown “The Final Days”.
What’s funny is, the quotes from Angie and PC Ian Smith are from that book! I’ll let you know where the Alvenia quote is from for you. Just know that EVERYTHING I say is from research. I realised long ago that the only way that the conflicting accounts would make sense is to work back from the absolute facts and absolute fact N°1 is the FACT that Jimi was declared dead in the Resuscitation Room, where only people in a critical state are taken. THe clincher to understanding what happened, enabling one to eliminate all the innacurate information and the lies.
JASON SAYS:
“His “information” is all made up by himself. He’s trying too hard to push Jimi’s overdose as late as possible so he can claim “Jimi was alive to have phony procedures” at the hospital.So, ‘our new friend’ says Jimi was in an all night bar drinking all morning, took Vesparax before the 18th, and claims 4 pills wouldn’t kill Jimi.”
I’m not making a thing up at all. It’s all the result of years of research (obviously more than you two have done).
Also, I didn’t say that jimi was “at an all night bar drinking all morning” so why invent that? I said that, according to ALvenia, they had a drink in one before they dropped her off at Ronnie Scotts. Contact her if you don’t believe what has been printed.
I also didn’t say that 4 pills wouldn’t kill him! Why do you make this crap up? I said that if he took say 4 (whe don’t know how many he took), that would have been enough to put him in a critical state, a coma (which it obviously did because he was rushed to The Resuscitation Room – never done with 8-hour old stiffs).
You make up fake stories and ignore medical science.
Both ambulance men and a cop confirmed Jimi was dead at the Samarkand and you have him getting “phony procedures” at the hospital.
Eric Burdon said Monika called him in the early morning and you have Jimi drinking in a bar.
Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated Jimi died no later than 4am and you have Jimi drinking in a bar.
Dr. Bob Brown clearly stated Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival as did St. Mary Abbots Hospital and Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s publicist and you have him getting phony procedures.
You are talking nonsense and don’t know anything about the Jimi Hendrix case.
JASON SAYS:
“Eric Burdon said Monika called him in the early morning…”
Are you only up to there? You certainly haven’t researched this case much have you.
It was judy Wong who got the first alart that something wasn’t right with Jimi. “I just assumed it was about 9:30”.
“about” 9h30 – that means that it could have been at 9:13, 9:38 or even 9:59. It cetainly wasn’t in the early hours of the 18th.
That’s not all: there is a quote in Until We Meet Again from Gerry Stickells who says as soon as he got the alert that something was wrong with Jimi, he rushed directly to The Cumberland Hotel (he had no idea that Jimi was at the Samarkand) and found Jimi absent. He phoned around and discovered that Jimi had been taken St. May Abbot’s, so he went directly to the hospital, only to discover that Jimi was dead, which means after midday.
That’s not all, in an interview with Alvenia (on YouTube), she remembers that the call from Monika came in, Burdon told Monika to let Jimi sleep, or walk him round (he admitted that he was still high when all this happened). Half an hour later, Monika phoned back saying that Jimi was still in difficulty. According to Monika (not a reliable source, I know) Burdon said to her “Call your fucking ambulance then!” and not “Please Monika, call an ambulance” as he liked to put around after. During this second call, Alvenia recounts in that filmed interview that she was on the phone to Monika and at the same time putting her shoes on to rush round in order to help. So that was about half an hour since the first call from Monika, which was after the call to Judy Wong.
So, you can forget the nonsense that Monika and Eric were on the phone to each other at 2 a.m. or whatever.
LOL. HENDRIXGUIDE troll is basing his conspiracy theory on what he read from books while ignoring documented facts. That’s why he will always be wrong.
This is documented evidence. Phony claims from books is not.
Drug Overdose Kills Rock Idol Hendrix
September 19, 1970
London (Reuters) – American rock star Jimi Hendrix died yesterday of an overdose of drugs, a spokesman for St. Mary’s Abbots Hospital announced.
Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.
Hendrix 27, was found dead of an apparent drug overdose in a London apartment rented by 23-year-old Monika Dannemann, a beautiful German blonde.
Hendrix reportedly took several pills while suffocating on his own vomit according to hospital sources. A coroner’s officer took several blankets and some pills for analysis.
Police sources say the cause of death appears to be drug related. A post mortem examination was scheduled today, followed by a coroner’s inquest, probably Monday.
Please list your sources and we’ll let you know how reliable and accurate they are. Mine go back to 1970. There are a lot of biographies written about Jimi, and Tony Brown’s is just one of them.
Ivana, I gave you the sources of the quotes from Smith and Angie (Brown’s book). I’ll sift through my archive for Alvenia’s account. Just know that I NEVER invent stuff to fit an agenda.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Just know that I NEVER invent stuff to fit an agenda.
JASON says: LOL. You’ve been doing that since you’re first post trying to push your debunked hoax of Jimi having “phony procedures performed on him at the hospital”. I’ve debunked that fake claim with documented evidence and you still continue to push that asinine theory. You’ve tried to discredit Dr. Brown, Dr. Crompton, Dr. Thurston, Reginald Jones and John Saua to fit your agenda.
So, you believe what you read in a book but ignore medical science. That’s why your “research” is no good.
From Electric Gypsy (Shapiro/Glebbeek – Mandarin Books 1990) on page 464 of the 1994 reprint):
“Alvenia Bridges has said that after Monika and Jimi left the party, they drove to where she was staying in Elvaston Place. They all went for drinks in Soho before Alvenia was dropped off at Ronnie Scott’s.”
So, you two “tin foil hatters” who think that you are so clever will have to do a little more research if you wish to express yourselves credibly on this subject.
IVANA SAYS: “Just where did he get this information from. It certainly doesn’t exist in any of the biographies and articles I’ve come across.”
Do you mean to say that you never read two of the most famous books about the life and death of Jimi Hendrix???
Credibilty level: 0.
So, look at that again.
Angie confirms that the left the party at 3 a.m. and Alvenia confirms that they all went for drinks in Soho, THEN drove to ROnnie Scotts, THEN drove to the Samarkand, THEN according to P.C. Ian Smith had another argument – THEN Jimi stormed off to cool off, THEN he came back to the flat, they probably made-up, cooled off, THEN Jimi took his first pill or two. Later (an hour? two hours? – we don’t know), when the pills didn’t appear to work (according to Monika), she “gave him some more”. We don’t know for sure.
Whatever you evidently don’t understand about this case, at least we know that Jimi wasn’t murdered.
You’re believing the accounts of people who made conflicting claims and use that for your “research” which makes everything you are claiming inaccurate. That’s why your “research” is no good.
Jimi took all the pills at once because he was found dead dressed on top of the bed. If he was taking “more pills” like Monika lied about, Jimi would have been under the covers undressed trying to sleep. There’s another thing you’re wrong about with your lousy “research”.
Jimi played at Ronnie Scott’s with Eric Burdon the previous night. Jimi was at Kameron’s party at the time you mention, arriving there after spending much of the day at Harvey’s. Get your facts right, and do me a favour don’t question what I’m saying I know my Jimi Hendrix facts.
JASON SAYS:
“If you did real research, you would know that Jimi Hendrix was dead at the Samarkand Hotel and was declared dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbots Hospital.”
Incorrect. As I told you earlier, Jimi was pronounced dead in the RESUSCITATION ROOM.
He WAS seen in the ambulance on arrival but was NOT determined to be dead on arrival.
If DOA, he would have gone directly into the morgue and not into… CASUALTY.
JASON SAYS:
“Jimi played at Ronnie Scott’s with Eric Burdon the previous night. Jimi was at Kameron’s party at the time you mention, arriving there after spending much of the day at Harvey’s. Get your facts right, and do me a favour don’t question what I’m saying I know my Jimi Hendrix facts.”
Hilarious. AGAIN you show how little you know about the case.
Eric Burdon had a RESIDENCY at Ronnie Scotts. Jimi first went there to jam with Burdon and War on the 15th but was turned away because he was in such a state. He returned on the 16th and jammed with Burdon and War (a recording has circulated). On the morning of the 18th, if you read what Alvenia said, they simply dropped her off at the club (she would later go the Burdon’s hotel to sleep).
So, get your facts right please.
LOL You don’t know a damn thing. And you still can’t produce a hospital medical document that states Jimi Hendrix had phony procedures performed on him at the hospital. None exists because it never happened.
Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival” – Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s publicist.
JASON SAYS:
“And you still can’t produce a hospital medical document that states Jimi Hendrix had phony procedures performed on him at the hospital. None exists because it never happened.”
Incredible. So you STILL don’t think resuscitation proceedures were carried out? Beyond belief.
The witness you treasure (who was young and inexperienced, walking alongside the trolley for a matter of seconds) said that they were taking Jimi, not into only Casualty but to the “Emergency Room”! You’re star witness confirms what happened and you can’t even bring yourself to admit it! How dishonest is that?
You want me to produce “a document” to confirm it. Buster tactics now, in your pathetic desperation. Dr. Seifert confirmed it three times. The press even confirmed it (the Reuters quote provides no detail whatsoever).
Ex Police Superintendant Dennis Care carried out his own private investigation and John Suau confirmed to him that Jimi wasn’t dead at The Samarkand (which is why they quickly put a respirator on him and rushed him to the hospital with “full light and sirens”! Do you think that would be done with an 8-hour old dead body? If you do, I’m talking to fools here.
From what you’ve said on this stupidly long page confirms that you two haven’t read the books, the eye witness accounts, the press articles properly, so it’s obviously a waste of my time discussing this with such inexperienced and blinkered fools.
Luckily, we are in agreement that Jimi wasn’t murdered.
Well, if Jimi was “alive and breathing” to have “phony procedures performed on him at the hospital” as you falsely claim, then there would be a hospital medical document that confirmed that happened. Since no medical document like that exists, that means there was no phony CPR procedures. Hospitals document everything for every patient that enters the hospital. No document exists that says Jimi was “alive to get CPR”. Jimi was officially certified to be dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbots Hospital and that is documented on Jimi’s official record.
No, you are exactly like Buster the clown making up lies about “phony procedures”. He was never able to produce a hospital medical document either since none exists. The hoaxing troll makes up lies about “procedures” but has no evidence to prove it happened just like you.
So, you attack Dr. Bob Brown trying to discredit him because his testimony debunks your hoax. That’s pathetic.
Dr. Siefert already confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival but you ignore it and use his years later made up quote for your hoax instead.
Ambulance men Reginald Jones and John Saua confirmed Hendrix was dead.
Officer Ian Smith also confirmed Jimi was dead.
Doctors John Bannister, Martin Siefert, and Bob Brown clearly stated Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and was dead for hours.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital gave a media press conference on 9/18/70 confirming that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival.
Every single media outlet reported that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival.
Jimi’s press agent Les Perrin confirmed to the media that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival.
If Jimi was “alive” as you claim, all of these medical professionals, the hospital, and Jimi’s press agent never would have confirmed Jimi was a DOA. But you ignore all of this and push your phony hoax with your pathetic denials and phony alternate debunked “sources”.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll still has no clue about the Jimi Hendrix case. If he did, he wouldn’t be making these asinine comments.
The police told the ambulance men to take Jimi to the hospital as an emergency even though he was dead because they didn’t want to be bothered filling out forms. So, by law, they had to follow protocol and rush him as an emergency. Same thing at the hospital. They were required by law to to work on Jimi even though he was already dead. The resuscitation attempt was a “formality” because Jimi was long dead. So, you attack Brown and the evidence that debunks your false claims and use nonsense that fits your phony narrative instead. That’s what a troll does.
“The ambulance men were there, but Jimi was dead … There was really nothing they could do for him.” – Officer Ian Smith
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – Dr. John Bannister
“Jimi was rushed into the [resuscitation] room. He was put on a monitor, but it [ECG trace] was flat. I pounded his heart [CPR] a couple of times, but there was no point, he was dead” – Dr. Martin Siefert
“I did locum jobs at five or six different little hospitals while I was there. One of them was St. Mary Abbots Hospital, and I was working there when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead. Straight away, I knew who he was, but there was nothing I could do for him. There were a lot of people weeping and much commotion. Poor Jimi.” – Dr. Bob Brown
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival” – Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s press agent
“I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room” – Reginald Jones Ambulance Man
“As I say, we knew he was gone, he was on top of the bed dressed. When we moved him, the gases were gurgling, you get that when someone has died, it wasn’t too pleasant.” – John Saua Ambulance Man
“The ambulance rushed to the hotel on Landsdowne Crescent, in London’s Nottinghill Gate district, and took him to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital, where he was pronounced dead on arrival at 11:45 a.m., London time.” – Rolling Stone 10/15/70
How many more people and sources does HENDRIXGUIDE8721 moron need to hear from to finally understand that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and nothing was done for him? 🤣
They all confirmed Hendrix was dead on arrival and nothing was done for him besides a formality resuscitation and HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll still is dumb enough to push his phony hoax of “Jimi still being alive at the hospital to have phony procedures”. 🤣
Do some real research instead of reading nonsense in conspiracy books that are designed to make money off gullible fools like you.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: I’m not making a thing up at all. It’s all the result of years of research (obviously more than you two have done).
JASON says: “Research” doesn’t mean anything when you read conspiracy nonsense and believe “what someone said” after they made previous conflicting claims. That’s your “research” and it’s not accurate.
Brian Doyle said he’s done “years of research”. He read conspiracy books and invented his own fake stories for his “research”. He is no “researcher” and his “research” is no good.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Just know that EVERYTHING I say is from research. I realised long ago that the only way that the conflicting accounts would make sense is to work back from the absolute facts and absolute fact N°1 is the FACT that Jimi was declared dead in the Resuscitation Room, where only people in a critical state are taken. THe clincher to understanding what happened, enabling one to eliminate all the innacurate information and the lies.
JASON says: This is what I mean about crappy research.
If you did real research, you would know that Jimi Hendrix was dead at the Samarkand Hotel and was declared dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbots Hospital.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital conducted a media press conference on the afternoon of 9/18/70 telling the world Jimi died of a drug overdose and was certified dead on arrival. Dr. Bob Brown was one of the hospital spokesmen. After the hospital made that announcement it was published and broadcasted all over the world. That is an actual event that happened and is documented on Jimi’s official record and is official history that can never be changed. But with your faulty “research” and made up stories, you have Jimi Hendrix “alive to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital”. It’s a
damn joke and just a fake made up conspiracy theory.
Hilarious to see you two fools denying what eye-witnesses said. Nothing has been invented by me here. I simply quote the people involved. For example:
,
On the BBC Radio “WInk Of An Eye” program, Dr. Seifert said:
“We must have thought that at the time, there was possibility that we could try and resuscitate him”
No doctor in his right mind would rush an 8-hour old cadavre to the Resuscitation Room. No doctor in his right mind would think of trying to resuscitate a, 8-hour old cadavre!
Where do you get your ideas from, Mary Shelley? Buster? Pathetic tin foil hatter “experts” who don’t even know what is written in two of the most famous Hendrix books.
Dr. Brown (who walked alongside the trolley for 5 seconds) confirmed that Jimi was being rushed to the Resuscitation Room.
Jimi WAS NOT CERTIFIED DEAD ON ARRIVAL at all!! He was certified dead in THE RESUSCITATION ROOM! It’s Dr. Seifert, who was in charge that day and who signed the Death Certificate, that stated this. If he had been confirmed as dead on arrivla (i.e. an 8-hour old cadavre), he would have gone directly to the morgue, not into Casualty and Resusucitation you fools!
Hilarious page this, exposing “experts” that haven’t a clue.
Thanks for the ‘truth’ but no thanks. We don’t need it.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll left out the part where Dr. Bob Brown said Jimi was dead for hours.
You can keep posting all this crap as many times as you want, nothing is going to change the fact that Jimi was dead for hours and certified dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbots Hospital.
“He was dead and had been for some time,” Dr. Brown said, “I just came along with the trolley, walked with it for a few steps and on it went.”
Jason to say here that the world press were given the story that Jimi was DOA (in which case he wouldn’t have gone to the Resuscitation Room – or “the Emergencies room” as Dr. Brown called it) but:
The New Yourk TImes – 19th September 1970
“Mr. Hendrix was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington after collapsing this morning at the home of friends. Attempts to revive him were unsuccessful”
ATTEMPTS TO REVIVE HIM WERE UNSUCCESSFUL.
+ the press quotes that I listed earlier:
Peter Goddard (journalist): “A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”.
Evening News (18th September 1979): “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in London today after being taken to hospital suffering from an overdose of drugs”
Evening Standard (18th September 1979): “Doctors…fought to save his life but all attempts to resuscitate him failed”
Dr. Seifert:
“We must have thought that at the time, there was possibility that we could try and resuscitate him”
“When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead.”
Doctors NEVER try and revive bodies that have been dead for hours (well Victor did in the movies but that’s about it).
Seifert worked on Jimi in the Resuscitation Room, which proves without a shadow of a doubt that Jimi hadn’t been dead for hours.
Yes, doctors never try to revive dead bodies which is why your asinine claim that Jimi Hendrix had “phony procedures” is a joke.
All you can do is post a phony new made up quote from Siefert in 2000 when before he already confirmed Jimi was a DOA and did nothing for him. Sorry, you can’t use people who contradict themselves as a “source”.
I see you omitted your two favorite articles that you used to post that debunks your “phony procedures” hoax. Even those articles state Jimi was a DOA. It’s documented on his official record.
“Jimi was rushed into the [resuscitation] room. He was put on a monitor, but it [ECG trace] was flat. I pounded his heart [CPR] a couple of times, but there was no point, he was dead” – Dr. Martin Siefert
David Tune – The Daily Mirror, 19th September 1970: “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yeserday on the way to the hospital”
Evening News (18th September 1979): “Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in London today after being taken to hospital suffering from an overdose of drugs” – “He was certified dead by a doctor who examined him in the back of the ambulance”
The first article states “Jimi died in an ambulance” and the second article states “Jimi was certified dead by a doctor in the ambulance”.
This confirms what Ivana and myself have been saying all along, that Jimi Hendrix was certified dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital and there was no phony CPR procedures. Let’s thank HENDRIXGUIDE8721 for making that abundantly clear with his own “articles”.
Hi Jason, Trolls pick and choose the information that best suits their agenda. Who would believe that someone who had ingested 18 times the normal dose of a barbiturate could possibly be alive for a long amount of time. I’ve read up how doctors treat an overdose and it involves a number of procedures. Jimi suffocated on his own vomit and this would have happened soon after taking the Vesparax. A few things point to that: Jimi was fully clothed on top of the bed, the rice in Jimi’s stomach and the length of time between when Jimi actually took the pills and when the ambulance was called. We’re talking several hours. I also question the extent of those resuscitation attempts. They would have been the bare minimum just like Seifert said-a few thumps to the chest. These weren’t meant to bring Jimi back to life but to establish and record time of death.
Hi Ivana,
Trolls like Brian Doyle aka “Buster” and HENDRIXGUIDE8721 are quick to discredit anyone that refutes their phony claims.
Look what HENDRIXGUIDE8721 does to Dr. Bob Brown, he accused him of making up the fact that Jimi was dead for hours when several other medical professionals stated the same exact thing. He called Brown “young and inexperienced” as an excuse to discredit him. This was a man who went through years of medical school and was trained to identify a dead body. So, its just a pathetic lame ass excuse to keep pushing his stupid hoax when someone debunks his bullshit.
It’s been documented that Jimi had dried vomit completely blocking his airways which went all the way down proving he was suffocated on his own vomit. It’s been also documented that John Saua, Reginald Jones, John Bannister, Bob Brown, Martin Siefert all said Jimi was not breathing on arrival at the hospital. So, for Siefert to claim years later in 2000 that “there was some breathing going on” and “whether that’s life or not is a different story” is total bullshit when he is on the official record years before stating Jimi Hendrix was dead and he did nothing for him.
Also, let’s not also forget that Dr. Rufus Crompton stated that Jimi had fluid in his lung which would not allow him to be breathing. So, the completely blocked airways and the fluid would not allow Jimi to be breathing and add to the fact that Jimi was already confirmed dead by both ambulance men, a cop, and 3 doctors makes this phony hoax a total joke.
Of course it was the bare minimum, Jimi was dead for a long time. What could have been done to save his life? Nothing. That’s why Jimi never had any phony procedures and there’s no hospital medical document that proves it. Because it never happened.
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – Dr. John Bannister
“He was not breathing. We started pumping his chest to do cardiac massage and resuscitation. We tried to turn him over and he was very stiff and I think the rigor mortis had already settled in,” reports Dr. John Bannister, the attending physician St. Mary Abbots Hospital near London. “None of us knew that it was Jimi Hendrix.”
“Jimi was rushed into the [resuscitation] room. He was put on a monitor, but it [ECG trace] was flat. I pounded his heart [CPR] a couple of times, but there was no point, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
“Jimi Hendrix was dead a many good hours before he was brought in to the hospital. Unfortunately, there was nothing I could for him as he aspirated vomitus from a barbiturate overdose. It wasn’t as if there was something to be done about Hendrix. There simply wasn’t…any medical remedy.” – Dr. Bob Brown
All 3 doctors confirmed Hendrix was a DOA and was dead for hours. “Resuscitation” was only a formality and they did the bare minimum as rigor mortis already settled in.
That’s confirmation from ALL 3 doctors. All 3 doctors never would have all confirmed Jimi was a DOA and nothing was done for him if it wasn’t true.
And we also have the documented confirmation that attending doctors certified Jimi dead on arrival that was reported in major newspapers all across America. Brown, Bannister, and Siefert were the attending doctors and they confirmed it above.
“Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.” – Reuters 9/19/70
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: JIMI WAS NOT CERTIFIED DEAD ON ARRIVAL at all!! He was certified dead in THE RESUSCITATION ROOM!
JASON says: Sorry troll, Jimi Hendrix was certified to be dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital. The hospital gave a media press conference confirming it on 9/18/70. Jimi’s press agent is on the official record stating to the media that Jimi Hendrix was certified dead on arrival by St Mary Abbots Hospital. His job was to report accurate information to the press about Jimi Hendrix. This is official documented evidence that is on Jimi Hendrix’s official medical record forever that can never be refuted. You have nothing to confirm Jimi Hendrix had “phony procedures” because no medical document exists because it never happened!
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival.” – Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s press agent
Hi Jason, If Jimi was alive then there wouldn’t have been any need for Seifert to thump Jimi’s chest. It’s pretty simple.
Hi Ivana,
That’s right and everybody that witnessed Jimi that morning wouldn’t have said he was dead if he was still alive. Common sense tells you Jimi wouldn’t be alive after taking a massive overdose. His liver registered a .7 lethal level.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: So, you can forget the nonsense that Monika and Eric were on the phone to each other at 2 a.m. or whatever.
JASON says: HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll wants to “forget” about the early morning phone call Dannemann made to Burdon. Why is that? Because it destroys his hoax. That’s why.
Nobody ever said Dannemann’s phone call was placed to Burdon at 2 a.m. but he lies about that too.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll made the false claim that after Jimi left Kameron’s party, he stayed out later to do some more drinking. The fact is, the last time Jimi Hendrix went to a club was on Wednesday night the 16th at Ronnie Scott’s club, where he jammed on stage with Eric Burdon and War playing guitar on “Tobacco Road”. That was the last performance ever for Jimi Hendrix in his lifetime and it was the last time Jimi entered into a club.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll needs to do better job of research instead of believing the nonsense he reads in books which is designed to make money off gullible fools.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll said Jimi stayed out even later on Friday the 18th way into the early morning hours having more drinks. That is false. Eric Burdon was playing at Ronnie Scott’s with War that night, he was very exhausted and went to bed after the show with Alvenia Bridges while Jimi Hendrix was at the Samarkand overdosing on a lethal dose of Vesparax. Jimi wasn’t out at a club having more drinks, he was back at the Samarkand.
Eric Burdon tells the event of that fateful morning:
“I was fucking out of my mind. I’d just finished a gig at Ronnie Scott’s. I was in bed … and I got this telephone call from [Dannemann] … I said he’s just stoned, I said just wake him up. I said just pour some coffee down his face and slap him around and wake him up. And then I went back to bed. It was early morning when I got the call, in fact I thought it was earlier than early morning … in the early hours. Then I got this alarm bell ringing in my head, and I woke up and sat up and went, ‘Wait a minute, something’s wrong here’. I called her back, and I had to yell and scream in order for her to get an ambulance.”
After Dannemann’s phone call, Burdon got himself together and quickly headed over to the Samarkand.
“I didn’t want to look at the mess. We had to be there before,” Burdon told Hendrix’s long-term girlfriend, Kathy Etchingham. “We got the guitars out; we got the drugs out of the place.”
So there you have it folks, Burdon was in bed during the early morning hours of the 18th and Jimi was not out having more drinks at a club, he was overdosing on a lethal dose of Vesparax. Sunrise wasn’t until 6:46 am in London on the 18th and this phone call that Dannemann made to Burdon was earlier than that because it was still dark out. So, Jimi’s death was no later than 4 am just like Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated from the autopsy report. You can’t argue against science because you will always be wrong.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll has been easily debunked once again with his phony theory.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Incredible. So you STILL don’t think resuscitation proceedures were carried out? Beyond belief.
JASON says: Jimi Hendrix was certified dead on arrival as confirmed by St. Mary Abbots Hospital during their media press conference on 9/18/70, all 3 doctors, a cop, both ambulance men, and confirmed by Jimi’s press agent Les Perrin.
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival.” – Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s press agent
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: The witness you treasure (who was young and inexperienced, walking alongside the trolley for a matter of seconds) said that they were taking Jimi, not into only Casualty but to the “Emergency Room”! You’re star witness confirms what happened and you can’t even bring yourself to admit it! How dishonest is that?
JASON says: How dishonest you are for attacking the credibility and the credentials of a trained medical doctor for your debunked hoax. Jimi’s “resuscitation attempt” was only a ‘formality’ because he was already dead. It’s not my fault you are too dumb to understand what all these medical professionals are telling you.
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – Dr. John Bannister
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: You want me to produce “a document” to confirm it. Buster tactics now, in your pathetic desperation. Dr. Seifert confirmed it three times. The press even confirmed it (the Reuters quote provides no detail whatsoever).
JASON says: LOL. I asked Buster the clown to produce a document as well when he was posting here lying about Jimi having “phony procedures” just like you are doing. Like I said, if Jimi was alive to have “phony procedures” then a medical document would exist because hospitals document everything. Buster the clown couldn’t produce a hospital medical document either because none exists. Jimi never had any “phony procedures”.
Dr. Siefert confirmed on Jimi Hendrix’s official medical record that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival and nothing was done for him. He made up a new phony account years later in 2000, the bogus quote you use for your hoax. Reuters reported what St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed in their media press conference on 9/18/70 that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival as did the entire media outlets around the world.
“Jimi was rushed into the [resuscitation] room. He was put on a monitor, but it [ECG trace] was flat. I pounded his heart [CPR] a couple of times, but there was no point, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Seifert
“Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.” – Reuters 9/19/70
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Ex Police Superintendant Dennis Care carried out his own private investigation and John Suau confirmed to him that Jimi wasn’t dead at The Samarkand (which is why they quickly put a respirator on him and rushed him to the hospital with “full light and sirens”! Do you think that would be done with an 8-hour old dead body? If you do, I’m talking to fools here.
From what you’ve said on this stupidly long page confirms that you two haven’t read the books, the eye witness accounts, the press articles properly, so it’s obviously a waste of my time discussing this with such inexperienced and blinkered fools.
JASON says: Dennis Care LOL.
Once again, you still don’t know what the hell you are talking about. John Saua and Reginald Jones did not use a “respirator” they used an ASPIRATOR. That’s a completely different device. How many times do you need to be told that?
And you still don’t understand why Jimi was taken to the hospital. The police told the ambulance men to take Jimi there as an emergency because they didn’t want to spend the day filling out forms on a dead John Doe. By law, they were required to treat him as an emergency situation even though he was dead. But a moron like you still doesn’t understand that believing Jimi was rushed to the hospital to have phony “procedures”. LOL
“John ran up and radioed, got the aspirator” – Reginald Jones
“Well I remember we had a hell of a time trying to suck him out with an aspirator.” – John Saua
“I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room. He was blue, not breathing and not responding to light or pain. See, we just have to keep working on him and we did. We called the police from the radio in the ambulance. A couple of young policemen turned up and they told us to take him to the hospital.” – Reginald Jones Ambulance Man
“An ambulance crew by law just has to keep on working on him until we get him to hospital. There was no pulse, no respiration.” – John Saua Ambulance Man
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Hilarious. AGAIN you show how little you know about the case.
Eric Burdon had a RESIDENCY at Ronnie Scotts. Jimi first went there to jam with Burdon and War on the 15th but was turned away because he was in such a state. He returned on the 16th and jammed with Burdon and War (a recording has circulated). On the morning of the 18th, if you read what Alvenia said, they simply dropped her off at the club (she would later go the Burdon’s hotel to sleep).
So, get your facts right please.
JASON says: That’s what I said, moron. Jimi arrived at Kameron’s party late Thursday night. Wednesday night was the previous night on the 16th.
Hi Jason, The 17th was when Monika took the garden photos of Jimi at the Samarkand Hotel, they then went to the Portobello Road Market, back to the Cumberland Hotel. As they were driving along Jimi and Monika were invited to Harvey’s place where they stayed a few hours, and had that row. Jimi then went onto Kameron’s party and stayed there until the early hours of the 18th September. Monika then came by to pick Jimi up returning to the Samarkand Hotel in the very early hours.
Hi Ivana,
Yes, the 17th was the last full day of Jimi’s life. And the 16th was the previous night where he had his last ever public performance. They also had a row when Monika was causing a scene at Kameron’s party trying to get him to leave. Too bad Jimi didn’t stay at the party and head back to the Cumberland and pick up his guitars later at the Samarkand. He wouldn’t have OD’d and we wouldn’t have all these hoaxers and trolls making up outright lies about his death today.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 continues to argue against science and documented evidence and looks like a fool. The official Jimi Hendrix record proves Jimi was dead both before and after he reached the hospital which makes him dead on arrival. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival in their media press conference on 9/18/70 and for good measure, Jimi’s press agent Les Perrin confirmed to the media that Jimi Hendrix was certified dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbots Hospital. And finally, all the major media outlets around the world confirmed what St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed…that Jimi Hendrix died from a drug overdose and was certified dead on arrival.
This is history folks, this was the real event that happened. This event cannot be altered by hoaxers and trolls with a clear agenda wanting to change Jimi’s death into something totally different and ridiculous. All this evidence is etched into history forever.
What does HENDRIXGUIDE8721 troll have? He has a decades later made up phony quote from Siefert in 2000 which is not only ridiculous, but It’s absolutely impossible. A man with completely blocked airways could not have “some breathing going on” when he was already certified dead on arrival 30 years earlier. A real event that happened 30 years earlier cannot be changed 30 years later like Siefert tried to do on a conspiracy show.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 also uses contradicting quotes of what “someone said” that he read from conspiracy books. He also denies ALL the evidence that debunks his bogus theory. He pathetically discredits medical professionals and changes the event to fit his agenda. HENDRIXGUIDE8721 has no official document to prove his phony theory. Like I said, one would exist if that was the case.
Here’s the official Jimi Hendrix record that proves Jimi was dead before and after being certified dead on arrival. Hoaxers do not have evidence or full confirmation of Jimi being “alive” before and after. There is no official hospital statement confirming “Jimi had phony procedures” or was “still alive”.
Jimi Hendrix Death Confirmation at the Samarkand Hotel:
“I knew he was dead as soon as I walked in the room.” – Reginald Jones Ambulance Man
“As I say, we knew he was gone. When we moved him, the gases were gurgling, you get that when someone has died.” – John Saua Ambulance Man
“The ambulance men were there but Jimi was dead.” – Officer Ian Smith
Jimi Hendrix Death Confirmation at St. Mary Abbots Hospital:
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – Dr. John Bannister
“I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
“I was there when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead.” – Dr. Bob Brown
Jimi Hendrix Death Confirmation by Hospital and media:
“We don’t know where, how, or why he died, but he died of an overdose.” A St. Mary Abbots Hospital spokesman also said the pop singer was dead on arrival.” – CBS 9/18/70
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival.” – Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s press agent 9/18/70
“The ambulance rushed to the hotel on Landsdowne Crescent, in London’s Nottinghill Gate district, and took him to St. Mary Abbot’s Hospital, where he was pronounced dead on arrival at 11:45 a.m., London time.” – Rolling Stone 10/15/70
Well there it is folks, a full before and after confirmation of Jimi Hendrix being dead at the Samarkand and at St. Mary Abbots Hospital.
Reginald Jones, John Saua, and Ian Smith confirmed Jimi Hendrix was dead at the Samarkand Hotel.
Doctors John Bannister, Martin Siefert, and Bob Brown ALL confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital.
St Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed to the media that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival, Les Perrin confirmed to the media that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival, and Rolling Stone magazine as well as every media outlet reported what St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed to them in their media press conference…that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival.
This is actual documented Hendrix history that happened and it cannot be altered by hoaxers and trolls decades later trying to change Jimi’s death into something totally different and ridiculous.
Jimi Hendrix was declared dead by all these men both before and after. Hendrix died from a drug overdose and was certified dead on arrival. All of these men never would have made these confirmations if it never happened. That’s why trolls and hoaxers decades later can’t change an event that already happened and is why they will forever be wrong and will lose on science and documented evidence.
Jimi:All Is By My Side starring Andre 3000 as Jimi Hendrix is being shown here on television next week. The scene where Jimi is being violent towards Kathy Etchingham never happened, and is just another example of trashing reputations when the dead can’t defend themselves. The film had a budget of $5million but only grossed just under a million at the box office. Kathy threatened to sue the director John Ridley for misrepresenting her relationship with Jimi.
Saddened to hear of the death of Fayne Pridgon long time friend of Jimi Hendrix. RIP.💐
Hopefully nobody will watch it and it will get low ratings.
Have you watched the movie Ivana?
Just read that she passed away and she also dismissed the phony “murder” conspiracy theory.
Hi Jason, I’d seen this movie before didn’t think very much of it. The odd thing is that the Hendrix family refused to give the filmmakers permission to use any of Jimi’s music. There’s a lot of the real Jimi on film it’s better to watch that.
JASON says: And we get another new story from Monika. This is from the 90’s.
12/11/93
“Hendrix took the fatal dose of pills in the west London hotel of his girlfriend, former skating champion Monika Dannemann, and was pronounced dead on arrival at a local hospital.
Dannemann, 48, said Saturday that she didn’t know why Etchingham wanted to dig up the past but that the police would find ″what I said at the inquest was the truth. It’s important, too, for the fans to know what really happened.″
The morning he died, Dannemann said she thought he was sleeping, ″so I got my breakfast and had a wash, and went to get some cigarettes because we had run out. When I came back he was still sleeping. I looked at him closely and then I could see something was wrong,″ she recalled.
Noel Redding, bass player for the Jimi Hendrix Experience, said he always found his friend’s death mysterious.
Redding said his suspicions were fueled when conlicting claims came to light about how and when an ambulance was summoned, and whether anyone was with Hendrix when he took the pills.
″The supposition is now that he died much earlier and supposedly someone, whoever that is, tried to cover it up,″ Redding said. His recordings still sell some 3 million copies a year worldwide.
Hi Jason, Noel was right in having suspicions about Jimi’s death. This article relates to Kathy Etchingham’s investigation in the 90’s, and what she was able to uncover.
Hi Ivana,
Everyone including Noel had a right to be suspicious because Monika was lying about the entire event of that fateful morning. She changed her story on many occasions over the years and just like she did in this article. Noel was careful not to directly name Monika as the person who was trying to “cover up” her tracks but that’s definitely who he was referring to.
So, Monika in 1993 now added a new twist to her morning adventures. She now claims “she made breakfast and had a wash” before going out to purchase cigarettes. She never made this revelation before.
Monika has given different wake up times for when she supposedly woke up on the morning of September 18th. She once claimed she woke up at 11:00 a.m. but the ambulance was called at 11:18 a.m. to come to the Samarkand. There would be no possible way for Monika to have woken up at 11:00 to make breakfast, wash up, leave to purchase cigarettes, notice that Jimi was sick, and then call an ambulance in just 18 minutes. She also said she woke up at 9:00, 10:00, 10:20. So yes, she was definitely trying to cover up her negligence but did a very poor job of it by telling various times she woke up that morning.
Noel also made the confirmation that Jimi died much earlier that we were led to believe. That’s why Kathy during her investigation sought out Dr. Rufus Crompton, and as he read Jimi’s autopsy report, he estimated Jimi died no later than 4 a.m. due to the “medium sized rice meal” that was only partially digested in Jimi’s stomach. Guests at Kameron’s party confirmed Jimi ate rice around midnight in the 11:00 hour. That’s how Crompton arrived at 4:00 a.m. due to the human digestion process. And Eric Burdon also confirmed that Dannemann called in the early hours of the morning. Then it was made official by the ambulance men who confirmed Jimi was dead for a long time when they found him laying in dry vomit. Doctors also are on the official record confirming Jimi was dead for hours when he was brought in dead.
Thanks to Kathy for starting this investigation so we finally had some answers and proving Monika to be the liar we always knew her to be. It was a shame that she wasn’t grilled during the inquest on her many inconsistencies. The truth would have been out then and hoaxers and trolls couldn’t have been pushing bogus conspiracy theories today.
Hi Jason, Noel had every reason to be cautious about naming Monika because she threatened to sue him and take his house is she was made to look in any way responsible for Jimi’s death.
Monika spent a lot of time suing various publishers and biographers who she thought portrayed her in a negative way. One biographer decided to record what she said so that her comments couldn’t be misinterpreted.
Monika never wanted to be seen in a negative light. She always wanted to be seen in the way she portrayed herself which was a fictional version. After she was exposed as a liar by Kathy Etchingham people were able to see who the real Monika Dannemann was. She couldn’t handle it after she lied for decades and ended up killing herself.
I remember a comment made after Monika died that she never really got over the fact that Jimi died, and another said that her life revolved around Jimi. A more interesting one was that Monika was a life wasted. Uli insisted that Monika had moved on although she appeared to be a woman living in a time warp to some.
Uli was always insecure of Monika’s obsession with Jimi and always covered for her every chance he got. I don’t see how Monika “moved on” when almost every painting she made up to her death was of Jimi Hendrix. I didn’t see her painting tons of portraits of Uli. Every interview Monika gave was about Jimi Hendrix. I didn’t see her only talking about Uli in her interviews. Her book was about Jimi Hendrix and not about Uli. So, how could Monika have “moved on” when her world still revolved around Jimi Hendrix over 20 years after his death? I agree Monika was living in a “time warp” back in 1969 and 1970. When Monika and Kathy were in court in the 90’s Monika was dressed and had a hairstyle like she was back in 1969/1970. Monika couldn’t let go of the past and no doubt still felt guilty of her negligence on 9/18/70.
I think a lot of Monika’s obsession with Jimi had to do with his status and popularity. Although Uli was well known he just didn’t have the high profile that Jimi had. I think groupies find that sort of artificial stuff attractive-it’s all about the fame and not the actual person. Monika probably thought that if she mentioned Jimi Hendrix it would at least get her some attention. Kathy said that when she first saw Monika after Jimi’s death she was dressed as if she was still living in the sixties in blue crushed velvet reminiscent of something Jimi would have worn, and the height of fashion back then.
Hi Ivana,
Yeah, it was all about status with Monika. Then when Jimi died, she created this fantasy relationship where she could be linked to Jimi’s status forever. After she was exposed as a liar, and the charade was over, she killed herself.
Here’s an excerpt from an article in The Independent that I posted a while ago but it describes everything you talked about. Uli defended Monika here, but he was also not telling the truth as Monika contradicted his ridiculous claim of why he moved out.
That’s why you can’t rely on “what people said” for the Jimi Hendrix case. You need to go on the medical science because that never lies.
“A Rock Legend Unto Herself”
“she was with Jimi Hendrix when he died and built up a life based on their relationship. But in the end Monika Dannemann was the victim of her own self- delusion.”
“In court, the contrast between the women was stark – Dannemann with her Marianne Faithful fringe, a grotesque superannuated hippy chick versus Etchingham with the sleek Nineties bob and the executive suit. While Dannemann’s life seemed to freeze on the day Hendrix died, Kathy, a mother of two, had had the sense to let the Sixties go.
Uli John Roth, who was with Dannemann for 17 years, seethes at how the newspapers depicted Dannemann as timewarp woman.
“I’m speaking up for Monika because she was never very good at speaking up for herself,” he says. Dannemann had moved on he insists. “OK she still painted Hendrix but she painted other things, too.”
Roth, a musician, says he only moved out of her Seaford home because he needed more room for his studio equipment. But in an interview last year, Dannemann said their relationship had not worked and he knew “my heart would be for ever with Jimi.”
Watched a documentary about the Beatles last night which brought back memories of the deaths of John Lennon who was murdered in New York in 1980 and George Harrison who died of throat and lung cancer in 2001. Paul McCartney was instrumental in getting Jimi on the bill of the Monterey Pop Festival in 1967 and recognised in America.
Good for Paul McCartney who could recognize talent.
John Lennon just turned 40 when he was murdered. He would’ve had so many years to make more great music and you know a Beatles reunion and possibly a new studio album would have happened in the 80’s or 90’s. He very well could have been recording music today like Paul is still doing.
Same with Jimi Hendrix who would have been making amazing new music for years.
Here’s an article about the drug culture associated with the “Rock Scene” in 1970 amongst musicians and fans. The three most recent drug casulities at this time was Alan Wilson, Jimi Hendrix, and Janis Joplin.
Once again, there is no mention of imaginary wine or a phony “murder” regarding Jimi Hendrix’s death in 1970. That’s because all the phony tales of “wine and murder” were invented decades later by hoaxers only looking to profit monetarily off Jimi Hendrix’s name and his tragic overdose death.
The New York Times
Star’s Drug Deaths Stir Rock Scene
By George Gent
November 3, 1970
The sudden deaths from overdoses of drugs of Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin and Alan Wilson, composer guitarist of Canned Heat, have surprised the rock music community and point up a problem that is beginning to worry serious observers of the rock scene.
Most are convinced that there is an affinity between drugs and a musician’s (rock, pop, blues, jazz or folk) life style. They cite the night life, the overnight stands, the long rides to engagements and the loneliness associated with living out of hotels. The association goes back at least to World War I. It surfaced among the jazz artists of the 1930’s and the Big Band players of the 1940’s and 1950’s.
“Sometimes it’s just because it’s available, or you’re lonely or because you want to belong,” said Frank Cook, a former jazz and rock drummer who kicked the heroin habit six years ago and now manages a group called Pacific Gas & Electric.
Estimates of Use Vary
Mr. Cook first took heroin (without first smoking mari juana) when he was 14 years old and playing with Chet Baker and Gerry Mulligan on the jazz circuit. He later became the drummer with Canned Heat.
Now 28, he explained the peculiar pressures rock musicians are subjected
“The pressure today is much greater than when I started out in jazz. We used to play in clubs before may be 200 people. Today the groups perform for anywhere between 50,000 and 200,000 people.
“You’ve always got to be up, always smiling. By the end of the night, or after a long trip, you need some thing to give you a lift. For some people it’s liquor. For others, it’s drugs.”
Estimates of the extent of hard‐drug usage in the rock community vary greatly. In interviews with nearly a dozen veteran observers of the rock scene, including managers, performers, writers and club owners, the highest estimate was 20 percent, but the source acknowledged that it was only a guess. Most think the percentage is much lower, but growing at an alarming rate.
Mr. Cook said he knew 70 to 80 per cent of the groups now playing in the rock field and thought possibly one of these was using heroin, although, he added, “There are a lot into cocaine and a few into psychedelics.”
Kip Cohen, the 30‐year old managing director of Bill Graham’s Fillmore East, a major showplace for rock performers, expressed similar views.
“Cocaine has perhaps come to be known as the rock star’s drug,” he said. “It gives a slight lift, there is no physiologically debilitating factor with it and it’s also extraordinarily expensive and the rock musician is one of the few people who can afford it.”
He also felt that LSD was being used by relatively few performers and never during their performances. He continued:
“Heroin is the one drug that neither Janis nor any one else on this stage, in this milieu, could perform on. They simply couldn’t. A cooled‐out jazz musician of the early fifties could be into heroin and perhaps blow for a couple of hours at a certain club a certain kind of jazz, but high‐intensity, high dynamic, high‐energy rock music is foreign to the hero in experience.”
Pills, ups and downs, he said, were being seen in reasingly over the last year, particularly among the young people who flock to the rock concerts.
“It’s a very serious situation,” Mr. Cohen declared. “We see it everywhere. It’s become so much of their cul ure. We live in a drug society.”
Musicians often resort to drugs for sensory stimulation, either before or during the time of their performances. Some believe that mediocre music has been made to sound better as a result of this stimulation and that even good music has been improved.
But Mr. Cohen observed, it will not help “the uncreative, the thick, the insensitive who will wake up next morning and realize with a shock they’ve turned out a bunch of drivel, which may in itself be the frustration which prompts continuation of the use of drugs.”
A rock manager, who admitted he smoked marijuana (“in fact, I’m high right now”) and has experimented with other drugs, said that only “unhappy artists get into hard drugs.”
“Rock stars lead an intense life,” he said, “but happiness doesn’t come with the external rewards of life. There must be substance in their lives, and many are frustrated. It is important for them to feel really good and like what they are doing. If they don’t, it is easier to turn on.”
Turning on usually means smoking marijuana, and all of those interviewed agreed that marijuana was not a major problem.
“Everyone I know smokes grass” was a refrain heard over and over again.
Most felt that marijuana even was beneficial for some people. They traced young America’s growing cynicism to the alleged lies told them about the dangers of marijuana. “The kids just don’t believe the straight people any more,” is the way one young performer put it.
The drugs that are causing concern are heroin, the hallucinogens (LSD or, acid) and the various pills, (amphetamines, barbiturates and methamphetamine, or speed), which are rapidly gaining entry into the rock culture.
Reasons for Hard Drugs
Most observers believed that an artist turns to hard drugs only when he is suffering from personal inadequacies. These could be almost anything—an inability to handle sudden success, a failure of artistic nerve or doubts about the future, the breakup of a family or a love affair, or just loneliness.
The need to perform, they felt, and they included all types of performers, “the need to receive mass love and recognition,” was indicative of an inability to receive it on a one‐to‐one personal basis. As one observer expressed it
“The cheering thousands are a tremendous uplift while the cheering is going on, but when it’s over and the artist has to return to the hotel room, the need for someone or something is still there, obviously.”
Just before their deaths at the height of their fame, both Miss Joplin and Mr. Hendrix had undergone crises in their artistic lives.
Miss Joplin was just emerging from a downturn in her popularity but had formed a new group that friends said she was very happy with. Without exception the friends expressed surprise that the raspy‐voiced vocalist had succumbed to an overdose of heroin, although, after her death, there were some reports acknowledging drug usage.
She was known as a heavy drinker, but had often spoken out against drugs. Most were convinced that her death was an accident attributable to inexperience with heroin.
‘It’s Nothing New’
Mr. Hendrix, who died after taking nine sleeping pills, was also recovering from a period of depression stemming from dissatisfaction with a former band and from audience demands that he continue to play and perform in his old style, a demand that he felt threatened his artistic development. But both were still at the top of their profession and were reported to have been earning as much as $50,000 a performance.
“That says something about material success, doesn’t it?” said Gerry Mulligan, the jazz artist who had a long bout with heroin addiction. “It’s nothing new. It’s reached a lot of other generations. It has its own pressures and generates its own strong destructive drives. But it’s a good thing if they got scared of, heroin.“
Wow! What an article. Some scary truths about the dangers of drug use and it’s impact on the lives of various musicians. There are so many positive things that could help with the pressures of fame, touring and performing if only these musicians accessed relaxation techniques for example or could have spoken to mental health professionals. These might have helped. At any rate this is a sad article.
BUSTER says: I had a personal conversation with Albert Allen and asked him why he didn’t say anything back then…I hope to release it in a future book…
JASON says: Well, my suspicions about this hoaxing fraud Brian Doyle were 100% right on the mark. I was reading older posts that I never paid attention to and I came across this comment from August 2, 2019.
Doyle said he plans to release his conspiracy garbage in a “book” which is why he worked so hard scamming his Jimi Hendrix “murder” hoax all over the internet for over a decade. Nobody would be pushing a hoax so hard like this if they didn’t plan to profit off this Hendrix “murder” scam.
That’s what all these fraudsters do, they sell lies to make money off gullible suckers and Doyle needs an audience to sell it to.
That’s why he became so enraged when Ivana and myself began to debunk and refute his lies. He didn’t want his fake stories to be exposed as the lies as they are. That’s why he tried so hard to get Ivana and myself thrown off this site so his lies couldn’t be further exposed. He wasn’t fooling anybody and his motives were well telegraphed but now we have the confirmation of the conspiracy book he plans to scam people with.
I’ll continue to expose this fraudster so he won’t be able to profit off an outright lie.
It’s a classic tactic of Doyle’s if he’s cornered he’ll start attacking us. I came onto this forum because of the rubbish Doyle was peddling about Michael Jeffrey and Monika being Jimi’s murderers. He just ignored the fact that Michael was in Spain at the time and no where near the Samarkand Hotel in London. But never let the truth get in the way of a good story but in this case an average story.
Same with me. I’ve read all these crazy Hendrix conspiracies on other sites before and then I was reading the garbage he was peddling here about Jeffery and the wine so I decided to leave a comment. Brian Doyle attacked me from my very first post as he pretended to be an “authority” about everything.
Then I noticed as he was rambling on more and more, that he was the same person posting Hendrix conspiracy nonsense in comment sections on other sites plus all the sites you pointed out to me. That made it clear he was just a serial hoaxer with an obvious agenda.
I was talking with a member of another forum and he told me Doyle does the same exact thing on political and JFK sites by creating phony conspiracy theories and attacks whoever disagrees with him. He’s been banned from at least 3 of those sites in the last few months I’ve been told. The member told me Doyle is desperate to be seen as a “credible researcher” and wants the recognition of making some “big discovery” both political and with Hendrix even though it’s a fake conspiracy he made up himself. He also told me Doyle is seen as a joke in both communities and is treated as a laughing stock. And we both know about that from his antics here and with his various pseudonyms scattered all over the internet for all to see.
I forgot to mention that the member also told me that when Brian Doyle perceives someone as a threat to exposing his scam, he’ll demand from the owner/moderators to either ban the poster or shutdown the thread so it can no longer be discussed.
Doyle will claim the poster is not “answering his good evidence” which makes that person “not credible” and is just “trolling”. Sound familiar? He did the same thing to both of us.
Doyle could never produce the sources of his information because there weren’t any. It was all coming from his imagination. I’m glad he’s seen as a joke with no credibility by us and others because that’s what he is. Even though he used a number of pseudonyms his reasoning and style are unmistakable-a lot of hot air.
All the people on the “Straight Dope” forum were laughing at him when he posted as “jetblast”. If you read some of his ridiculous commentary over there you can easily see how he embellished his “stories” when he started posting here. All his previous claims were all contradicted as he changed his script.
Years ago I was on a music forum, which is now defunct, but it was a place for music fans to discuss collecting our favorite bands and artists music but one person started disrupting the threads with rock star “murder” conspiracies and I’m pretty sure that was our “friend” posting there.
I’ve noticed that conspiracy theories all seem to have a common theme. There is always some government involved in a plot and you can be sure it’s either Russia or China. The CIA, FBI, KGB and Secret Service of other countries are also mentioned. Government ‘cover-ups’ are also a feature of these conspiracies.
Don’t forget MI-5 or MI-6 depending on which one they want to claim Jeffery belonged to. According to these hoaxers the CIA, FBI, black panthers, and the mafia all played a part in the infamous imaginary wine drowning with all the doctors all taking part in a giant “cover up”. Monika was the “brains” of the “hit” along with Jeffery working accordance. But somehow Dr. Bannister went rogue in 1992 and revealed the entire plot when it was all supposed to be “top secret”. And then mostly unknown Hendrix acquaintances/”friends” all knew about it but never said a word for decades until it was time to write a book. You wouldn’t find a plot this ridiculous in the worst Hollywood script.
Always will be full of hot air.
Just waiting for a gullible audience to lap it all up. How could I forget MI-5, MI-6 with Michael Jeffrey their special agent. Just call me Bond James Bond or better still just call me Jeffrey Michael Jeffrey 007 😂
I think Jeffery was known as “Agent Purple Haze” who used a special shoe phone (from Spain) like Maxwell Smart did in Get Smart. 🤣
And Monika as “Agent If 6 Was 9”. I wonder if she ever wore a trench coat. 😁
Haha
The special agents “Purple Haze” and “If 6 was 9” organized the whole operation in the Red House over yonder 😃
Mick Jagger on why Jimi Hendrix “went off the deep end”
Mick Jagger is somebody who knows a thing or two about rock ‘n’ roll hedonism and the cataclysmic effects it can have. The Rolling Stones leader, with the death of Brian Jones being a pertinent reminder of the potential fatal ending, has seen the world of music evolve across decades. His words on Jones’ death are well covered, but his thoughts on another ’27 Club’ member, the passing of Jimi Hendrix, are excruciatingly on the bone and point towards the harsh realities of fame.
The Hendrix story is intrinsically linked with Jagger’s Rolling Stones bandmate, Keith Richards, who played an instrumental part in Hendrix’s rags to riches story. The guitarist famously made his way over to European turf following a chance encounter in a New York nightspot where his skills thrilled Linda Keith, the then-girlfriend of Keith Richards. The guitarist quickly recommended Hendrix to The Animals’ bassist Chas Chandler who immediately offered to be his manager, and the rest, as they say, is history.
On September 24th, 1966, Hendrix took up the offer from The Animals’ bassist and moved to the swinging scene in London, where he signed a management and production contract with him and Animals manager Michael Jeffery. Chandler immediately began recruiting members for a band that would get the best out of Hendrix’s insane ability, and the Jimi Hendrix Experience was born.
Hendrix’s sharp rise to fame led to an even fiercer escalation in personal problems, and his life would tragically end in 1970 when he overdosed on a concoction of medicine. Despite only having a handful of years as a known talent, Hendrix conquered more in that time of note than most artists do in their lifetime, but his life is a warning sign about the gruesome side of fame.
Mick Jagger knew him well, and Hendrix’s story is all-too au-fait with, having seen many fall down a similarly slippy rope. “He was a really sweet guy,” Jagger later told Rolling Stone in 1995. “A bit confused. It’s the same old story: Jimi Hendrix played all over the place with all these bands. He’d been a background guitar player for donkey years.
“And suddenly he gets what he wants, then has to play ‘Purple Haze’ every night,” Jagger continued. “He goes, ‘Uh, I don’t want to play “Purple Haze” every night. I don’t want to burn the guitar.’ And then when everyone went off the deep end, he had to go off the deep end. He became a heroin addict.”
Jagger’s bandmate Richards remembers Hendrix in the fondest way imaginable, choosing to treasure his talent rather than his addiction issues. “Jimi Hendrix, bless his heart … almost inadvertently ruined [the] guitar,” Richards told The San Diego Union-Tribune. “Because he was the only cat who could do it like that. Everybody else just screwed it up, and thought wailing away [on the guitar] is the answer. But it ain’t; you’ve got to be a Jimi to do that, you’ve got to be one of the special cats.”
Once heroin gets involved, the story usually only ends in one way, and tragically Hendrix is an example of what happens when fame mixes with opiates — even if they didn’t play a direct part in his death, heroin held a grasp over him. The drug has tarred rock ‘n’ roll but continues to become the preferred vice and the only method of escapism that seems appealing from the fame.
Although it seemed like nothing could get him down on the surface, and he was revelling in every moment of stardom, the dramatic way that his life-changed in such a short time made him lose sight of recognising himself. Drugs offered him a temporary break from being this performing circus animal playing ‘Purple Haze’ to roaring fans every night. The thing that he dreamt of for his life didn’t end up being a completely different beast from the one he envisaged whilst playing in dive bars across Greenwich Village. In his case, the journey was a more scintillating experience than the destination, and drugs offered him respite, which ultimately led to a chokehold that he couldn’t wrestle away from.
https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/rolling-stones-mick-jagger-jimi-hendrix-heroin/
Insightful article. From what I’ve read Jimi was never addicted to heroin or any other drug according to those who worked with him. Jimi seems like a tragic figure but I think it was a case of be careful what you wish for. Chas Chandler said Jimi’s life was full of fun, it was others who had the idea that he was unhappy and self destructive. He talked about taking some time off maybe that would have helped. Rock n Roll and unhealthy lifestyle seem to go hand in hand. Buyer Beware.
Dr. Teare determined that Jimi wasn’t a drug addict by inspecting his arms for evidence of needle marks for Heroin but that’s not to say he didn’t snort it instead.
Some people say Jimi wasn’t addicted to drugs and other musicians that knew him well who are still living state that he was. So we only have their word to go by if it is actually the case or not.
It’s no secret that Jimi used drugs and it was increasing at the end of his life but how much he used will always be up for debate. A lot of drug use that musicians were supposed to be taking has been exaggerated. Elton John claimed to have used cocaine “every four minutes”. That would be impossible to snort cocaine every four minutes throughout the day and still be alive today without dying from a major overdose.
Hi Jason, I think some of these musicians who had addictions of some sort went into rehabilitation at some stage. I’ve read about Elton John’s use of drugs, and he is even amazed that he’s still alive to tell the tale. Refreshing to hear that Alice Cooper is clean living. Jimi did use drugs but to what extent we only have other’s opinions to go by like you said.
Hi Ivana,
There’s no doubt Elton John abused cocaine for well over a decade but using it “every four minutes” each day is an exaggeration. He wouldn’t even have a nose left at that rate.
I read a story about Alice Cooper a few years ago and ironically it was Bernie Taupin Elton’s songwriter who got Alice hooked on cocaine in the late 79 or early 80 when he was at his house and tried some. Alice went to rehab for alcohol but replaced it with cocaine and heroin. If you see videos of him from 1982 he looks horrible from his drug abuse.
I don’t understand why anyone would deliberately ruin their health. I’m clean living myself having never smoked or drunk alcohol. Drug use destroys people’s lives and leads to all sorts of health problems. I wonder what types of people inhabit the music industry. Elvis and Mama Cass were very overweight but did the management ever suggest that they lose weight to improve their well being. The same with Janis Joplin who was addicted to heroin where were the people who were supposed to look after her. It seems like singers and musicians are surrounded by yes people and sycophants.
Most of their handlers probably didn’t care as long as they were making a ton money for them so they just let them do what they wanted. And a lot of managers and producers were on drugs too. Jimmy Miller who produced the Rolling Stones albums in the late 60’s and early 70’s was heavily into heroin and the Stones got rid of him since he was unable to function.
I don’t know why they would either but I guess at the time they were doing drugs they didn’t think of it as ruining their health. David Crosby says he now regrets all the drinking and drugs he did because it ruined his liver and he’s in bad shape right now. He says that he was glad he went to prison because he said it saved his life to get off of cocaine. He said if he didn’t go he would have been dead.
Elvis went on a crash diet for a few months in late 1972 and lost a lot of weight when he did the “Aloha From Hawaii” satellite tv special in January 1973, but right after he performed, he went right back to over indulging in food and increased his pill intake. His “Memphis Mafia” claimed they tried to get him to stop taking pills and a couple of them even dumped his pills down the toilet and Elvis became enraged and said he “would kill them if they ever did that again”. His doctor, Dr. Nick, who killed him with the massive amount of pills he prescribed said if he wasn’t prescribing Elvis pills another doctor would and would probably be prescribing even more. He tried to claim he didn’t give Elvis as much pills as he wanted but I don’t buy that at all.
Mama Cass had a Las Vegas engagement and lost weight as well but was nervous about performing so she took drugs and was unable to perform. The show was a bust and she had to cancel the remaining shows. I guess she was having trouble with her voice too. She gained all her weight back right after that as well.
Some musicians who didn’t take drugs ended up dying young from diseases or other problems and the ones who did are still alive so you never know what’s in store in life.
If the handlers really cared for them they would do whatever it took to protect them and it seems not enough actually did.
Hi Jason, Unfortunately drugs seem to be an integral part of the music business.
Hi Jason, I remember reading something Noel said that everyone took from Jimi but the only thing they gave were drugs which brings to mind when Jimi was arrested in Toronto for possession of heroin after a thoughtless “fan” threw it into his bag. Luckily Jimi was found not guilty by the jury.
Hi Ivana,
Kathy ended her relationship with Jimi and Chas Chandler quit as his manager in ’69 because of all the hangers on inside the studio when Jimi was trying to record. Kathy said Jimi changed during that period and Chas said it was a toxic environment and wanted out. According to them, that’s when Jimi’s drug intake increased and his performances began to falter. So, Noel was right those deadbeats took from Jimi and only shared drugs with them. The “Aleem Twins” were hangers on as well during that time.
Yeah, Jimi was lucky he beat those drug charges with the strict laws that Canada had at the time. They were even more strict then than in 1977-1978 when Keith Richards got busted for Heroin.
Hoaxers like the quack Brian Doyle promoted the ridiculous conspiracy theory that Michael Jeffery had heroin “planted” in Jimi’s bag so he would be beholden to him and could fully control him. I called that out as b.s. in my very first comment because Jimi could have gotten 20 years in prison and there’s no way a manager would attempt a stunt like that to have his “cash cow” be locked away for decades and lose out on a ton of money. And especially if it was confirmed that Jeffery was the one who planted it because he would have been arrested and jailed as well. So, all these phony conspiracies are made up to make Jeffery appear sinister with a serious “motive” to harm and kill Jimi. It’s nothing but nonsense.
Channel 32 over here has been showing a series of movies dedicated to musicians. They started with Jimi and ended last night with the Oliver Stone movie about Jim Morrison. Jim Morrison died in France in 1971 at the age of 27 like Jimi. He was found dead in the bathtub by his partner Pamela who sadly also died at the age of 27 from a heroin overdose. I remember something Brad Pit said that fame wasn’t all it was cut out to be. It might buy you a nice house and car but at what personal cost.
As you read biographies about famous actors, musicians, athletes, writers in general you’ll find most of them were miserable and didn’t enjoy the success they had and the wonderful talent they gave to the world. Most of them became addicted to some type of substance and didn’t enjoy the time they were popular. Then when they started to fade, they became depressed they weren’t popular, and continued the substance abuse even further.
I read a story about an “unknown musician” who didn’t want to be named but was very candid about his time in a popular rock band. He said he hated every minute of it especially the rigorous touring and all the studio time it required to make an album. The only thing he liked was the access to many women and cocaine but he nearly went broke and nearly lost his life because of it. So, this was another person who hated what he did. If they never became famous they would probably still be depressed.
Some of these people find solace in religion, they suddenly ‘discover’ God after realising just how shallow and vacuous their lives really were. Others have changed professions altogether and find meaning in those. Sadly others couldn’t cope with being out of the limelight and either turn to drugs or increase their intake. Tragically some take their own lives.
This is during the period when Alice Cooper was heavily addicted to cocaine and heroin. He also relapsed with alcohol which eventually caused his wife to leave him. You can see the effects of drug abuse as his face is bone thin with protruding cheek bones and he is breathing hard when he talks. Alice is lucky he survived it but basically looks like a cartoon caricature here.
Alice Cooper on the Tomorrow Show with Tom Snyder, 1981 full interview
Hi Jason, He looks very unwell. At least he survived all that negative stuff and triumphed.
25 Notable Extremes Musicians Were Driven To By Drugs
https://www.complex.com/music/2013/02/25-notable-extremes-musicians-were-driven-to-by-drugs/
Interesting list of musicians the two who surprised me the most were Natalie Cole and Yoko Ono. At least some of these people recognised they had an addiction and sort help.
I’ve been reading about the most addictive drugs:Cocaine, Heroin, Alcohol, Nicotine, Methamphetamine. Withdrawal from these drugs brings on all sorts of physical symptoms.
Yeah, it was surprising to learn that Natalie Cole was addicted to crack cocaine and heroin. I’ve read she where she talked about taking a lot of LSD in college and it’s been reported she worked as a prostitute so she could fuel her heroin and crack addiction. Even though she gained fame and had a wonderful voice she also had a miserable time and her drug addiction shaved decades off her life.
Another casualty of heroin was Frankie Lymon. He overdosed in 1968 when he was 25 in his grandmother’s bathroom with a syringe by his side.
The Fast Life of Frankie Lymon — a Fool for Love at Just 14
https://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/The-Fast-Life-of-Frankie-Lymon-a-Fool-for-Love-2994074.php
Hi Jason, Whitney Houston is another tragic life story. A great voice and talent but a victim of drug abuse and domestic abuse. They have success in their professional lives but their private lives are a different story. There was a documentary series filmed here last year that followed the lives of four people who were addicted to drugs and alcohol. The youngest was a girl in her early twenties who couldn’t get through the day if she didn’t drink a lot of alcohol in the morning. Another had mental issues because of trauma she experienced and had used drugs all her life. The hardest part to watch was these poor souls trying to shake their habit in a rehab clinic. Some made it but sadly others didn’t do so well.
Hi Ivana,
Yeah, Whitney Houston is another tragic figure who was surrounded by enablers and her husband is the one who destroyed her life and supplied her with drugs.
Even after people watch those shows and see how drugs and alcohol destroy lives they still continue to abuse those substances themselves.
Syd Barrett of Pink Floyd, Peter Green and Danny Kirwan of Fleetwood Mac all developed serious mental issues due to using LSD.
Peter Green was one of the greatest guitarists of all time but his career was cut short in 1970 because LSD wrecked his mind. He became very religious and felt money was ‘evil’. He grew long fingernails and eneded up sleeping on park benches becoming homeless. He recorded some solo work but it was not the same as Fleetwood Mac. Sadly, he died last year.
Danny Kirwan also developed mental issues due to LSD. Coincidentally, both Green and Kirwan took acid at the same party and were never the same after that. Some people believe it was bad acid meant to do harm to people who took it. Kirwan fought with the late Bob Welch before a show and smashed his own head into a wall and a mirror. He refused to play the show and sat in the audience and was criticizing the band. Mick Fleetwood fired him and he only released a couple of solo albums and that was it. He also was homeless and lived in a mental facility until he recently died. He had a lot of talent too and never accomplished what he could have.
Reading back on some of the comments made in the press after Jimi died. One newspaper wrote that he was a cocaine addict, drugs kill Jimi, he was a “victim of the drug culture he helped perpetuate.” After the inquest these comments were replaced with the real cause of Jimi’s death.
As we’ve both read drugs are bad news. They destroy health, livelihoods and relationships.
Some conspiracy theorist on a blog was trying to revive the phony claim by Monika Dannemann that “Jimi was poisoned by the mafia”. According to this clown, Monika was under the influence of Vesparax and was falling asleep while “the murderers” (including Jeffery) were shoving 9 pills down Jimi’s throat. But she subconsciously stored this in her memory until she finally thought of it during her interview in 1975 to tell the world that “Jimi was murdered”. These tin foil hatters will think of anything to keep this hoax going.
I don’t believe what I’ve just read. How stupid do you need to be to come up with this garbage and to believe it. 😂
This “blogger” called it a “mafia hit” and said they took care of Jimi before he could release his next album so Jeffery could profit off all the sales and have full direction as producer. And to also hide the books which would show Jeffery’s “embezzlement” and other nonsense this clown accused Jeffery of doing.
There’s also other ridiculous conspiracies involving: Sam Cooke, Lenny Bruce, Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, Duane Allman, Elvis, Paul Kossoff, Ronnie Van Zandt, Keith Moon, Bon Scott, John Lennon, and John Bonham. Just a bunch of made up nonsense that only an idiot would believe.
These “bloggers” deliberately target the dead knowing full well they can’t be challenged on what they say. They’re a deceitful lot. They would never make up this stuff if these people were still alive they just wouldn’t risk it knowing full well they could be sued.
It would be nice if there was a living family member that could file a defamation lawsuit against these hoaxers and then these conspiracies wouldn’t be as easily promoted. These frauds push this stuff since they know the dead people they smear aren’t alive to go after them for defamation. But if a living family did then a lot of them would think twice before they decide to write outright lies.
Hi Jason, Some of these same people even accused Kathy of having an agenda against Monika when she started her brilliant investigation into Jimi’s death.
IVANA says:
“Some of these same people even accused Kathy of having an agenda against Monika when she started her brilliant investigation into Jimi’s death.”investigation into Jimi’s death.”
That is in fact true! I can see that as well as not having correctly read “Electric Gypsy” and “The Final Days”, you haven’t correctly read (or haven’t read at all) another key book – Kathy’s “Through Gypsy Eyes”.
On page 178, she explains what prompted her to launch her investigation and it centered on Monika. She had met Monika properly for the first time in the early 90s, to see if she was also going to take action against David Henderson (because of the accusations against the two girls in his book). Monika didn’t seem pressed and Kathy found her to be slightly deranged.
Not long afterwards, Noel Redding phoned Kathy in tears, saying that Monika had served him a writ against him because he had said in his book that she had been negligent on the morning of Jimi’s death. He asked Kathy if she could help him. Kathy promised Noel that she would look into the circumstances around Jimi’s death the best she could, to help Noel defend himself from Monika’s attack. THAT was the agenda that Kathy had in relation to Monika. Something that you two didn’t know apparently.
There’s more. Kathy remembered that Mitch’s wife Dee (who she had only met once at a party a couple of weeks earlier) had said that she had once worked as a researcher for the BBC. So Kathy got in touch with Dee, to see if she could help out. What Kathy didn’t know at the time was that Dee was a fraud and a stalker of people who had been close to Jimi. What Kathy reveals about her in her book is quite alarming. When Kathy became uneasy about the clinging Dee she distanced herself from her. Unbelievably, Dee then put rumours around that Kathy and her doctor husband were drug dealers and child abusers and that Tony Brown could confirm it! Another nutcase. Kathy got the police to warn Dee to pack it in. It’s all in Kathy’s book (before you cry “hoax”).
Then, unbelievably again, Dee then stalked and befriended Monika!!! Even helping her with her Hendrix research, getting new statements from ambulanceman John Suau that contradicted the previous statements!
So yes, this devious stalker was well aware that there was an issue with Monika from the outset of the investigation and it was Dee that contacted the ambulancemen ahead of Kathy (it’s in Kathy’s book).
The fact that John Suau also told ex- police Superintendant Dennis Care that the accounts that had been published in the books (Straight Ahead fanzine and Tony Brown’s books) were incorrect suggests that Dee may have initially pre-briefed (bribed?) the two men in order to gain favour with Kathy. The two men had of course been accused by Monika of having sat the struggling Jimi up in the ambulance, so they would have been only too pleased to clear their name by saying that Jimi was already dead at the Samarkand! Research (by Glebeek) has also revealed that there was in fact a rumour going round St. Abbotts hospital at the time that the ambulancemen HAD sat Jimi up and precipitated his death!
One must also remember that John Suau stated (to Dennis Care) that Jimi was in fact still alive in the ambulance.
So you see, if you do your research properly, things fall into place perfectly.
JASON says:
“…these are the same hypocrites that call Monika a liar but use all her lies to push the bogus theory for their hoax. Our two “friends” who posted here both use Monika’s lies for the basis of their hoax and have attacked Kathy as well.”
I find it particularly offensive that you consider me a hoaxer like that other guy, when the only thing that you and I have a differing opinion about is the time and place of death (it’s not an opinion on my behalf because all the facts show that it was in the ambulance).
In fact you have more in common with Buster than I do because you still think that Jimi lay dead for hours at the Samarkand. When you are proven wrong, all you can do is stupidly yell “hoax!”, rather like Buster who claims that all witnesses, doctors and police were “brought into” the conspiracy, when his looney theories are proven wrong.
The pair of you should really do deeper research if you wish to have some credibility in your “knowledge” this affair.
Hi Ivana,
Yes they did, and these are the same hypocrites that call Monika a liar but use all her lies to push the bogus theory for their hoax. Our two “friends” who posted here both use Monika’s lies for the basis of their hoax and have attacked Kathy as well. Whoever proves their bogus conspiracy theories to be fake they will attack because it destroys their lies.
The conspiracy surrounding Elvis Presley about faking his own death with some fans even believing that he had been seen in various locations. These types of fans find it hard to let go of their idols and it’s something tin foil hatters prey on. Family members all saw Elvis’ body and he is buried at Graceland.
The anniversary of Elvis’ death is in a couple of days on August 16th.
These Elvis conspiracies were made up so fraudsters could make money off gullible suckers. Many books, videos, magazines were produced with phony conspiracies of Elvis still being alive. There used to be a weekly tabloid magazine called “Weekly World News” and it was always at the checkout counter at the grocery store. It had ridiculous stories like “A woman gives birth to an Alien” and there were several stories about Elvis over the years. Just like the similar nonsense hoaxers use for their Jimi Hendrix “murder hoax”.
One phony theory is that Elvis still lives in his room at Graceland and nobody is ever allowed to go in the room. There’s a youtube video that shows a man walking around on the grounds at Graceland who is supposed Elvis “still alive and well” but of current old age. Other people claimed to have seen Elvis sightings at gas stations, grocery stores, and out of the way motels. There was a phony documentary that showed a woman who saw Elvis alive in a disguise eating dinner at a small out of the way restaurant. When she questioned him he jumped up from the table, ran out the door, and sped away in his car lol.
There was also a photo from around 1978 that showed a smeared image of Elvis looking through the window in a separate bunaglow at Graceland which was considered “proof” that Elvis was still alive. The photo obviously turned out to be a fake but these fraudsters have been at it with their Elvis conspiracies for well over 40 years now and they started right after he died.
Hi Jason, This is really funny. I went to the website of “Weekly World News” and the stories are just ridiculous. Aliens, Area 51 and Roswell seem to be favourite topics with conspiracy theorists. A journalist even asked President Obama if he knew anything about alien spacecraft being in Area 51. I just don’t think the military would be feeling that relaxed if they knew aliens had visited our planet. 😀
Hi Ivana,
They used to sell Weekly World News magazines at grocery stores for years and they stopped making them for several years now. The website still has the same crazy stories. Maybe they can write one about Jimi Hendrix having phony procedures performed on him at the hospital. 🤣
HENDRIXGUIDE, Well aware of these books and others, and these stories.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: On page 178, she explains what prompted her to launch her investigation and it centered on Monika. She had met Monika properly for the first time in the early 90s, to see if she was also going to take action against David Henderson (because of the accusations against the two girls in his book). Monika didn’t seem pressed and Kathy found her to be slightly deranged.
Not long afterwards, Noel Redding phoned Kathy in tears, saying that Monika had served him a writ against him because he had said in his book that she had been negligent on the morning of Jimi’s death. He asked Kathy if she could help him. Kathy promised Noel that she would look into the circumstances around Jimi’s death the best she could, to help Noel defend himself from Monika’s attack. THAT was the agenda that Kathy had in relation to Monika. Something that you two didn’t know apparently.
JASON says: Hendrix Guide is acting like he posted some new revelations. LOL. This has been known for decades.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: There’s more. Kathy remembered that Mitch’s wife Dee (who she had only met once at a party a couple of weeks earlier) had said that she had once worked as a researcher for the BBC. So Kathy got in touch with Dee, to see if she could help out. What Kathy didn’t know at the time was that Dee was a fraud and a stalker of people who had been close to Jimi. What Kathy reveals about her in her book is quite alarming. When Kathy became uneasy about the clinging Dee she distanced herself from her. Unbelievably, Dee then put rumours around that Kathy and her doctor husband were drug dealers and child abusers and that Tony Brown could confirm it! Another nutcase. Kathy got the police to warn Dee to pack it in. It’s all in Kathy’s book (before you cry “hoax”).
Then, unbelievably again, Dee then stalked and befriended Monika!!! Even helping her with her Hendrix research, getting new statements from ambulanceman John Suau that contradicted the previous statements!
So yes, this devious stalker was well aware that there was an issue with Monika from the outset of the investigation and it was Dee that contacted the ambulancemen ahead of Kathy (it’s in Kathy’s book).
JASON says: Who cares. None of this changes the fact Jimi was dead for hours and was declared dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbots Hospital.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: The fact that John Suau also told ex- police Superintendant Dennis Care that the accounts that had been published in the books (Straight Ahead fanzine and Tony Brown’s books) were incorrect suggests that Dee may have initially pre-briefed (bribed?) the two men in order to gain favour with Kathy. The two men had of course been accused by Monika of having sat the struggling Jimi up in the ambulance, so they would have been only too pleased to clear their name by saying that Jimi was already dead at the Samarkand! Research (by Glebeek) has also revealed that there was in fact a rumour going round St. Abbotts hospital at the time that the ambulancemen HAD sat Jimi up and precipitated his death!
JASON says: Dennis Care LOL. Jimi wasn’t “struggling”. He was already dead.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: One must also remember that John Suau stated (to Dennis Care) that Jimi was in fact still alive in the ambulance.
So you see, if you do your research properly, things fall into place perfectly.
JASON says: You “research” nonsense so that’s why everything you claim is total b.s.
Jimi was not “still alive” in the ambulance. Reginald Jones and Officer Ian Smith both confirmed Jimi was dead at the Samarkand. Doctors Brown, Siefert, and Bannister all declared Jimi dead on arrival and the hospital gave a full confirmation. Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated Jimi died no later than 4am.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: “…these are the same hypocrites that call Monika a liar but use all her lies to push the bogus theory for their hoax. Our two “friends” who posted here both use Monika’s lies for the basis of their hoax and have attacked Kathy as well.”
I find it particularly offensive that you consider me a hoaxer like that other guy, when the only thing that you and I have a differing opinion about is the time and place of death (it’s not an opinion on my behalf because all the facts show that it was in the ambulance).
In fact you have more in common with Buster than I do because you still think that Jimi lay dead for hours at the Samarkand. When you are proven wrong, all you can do is stupidly yell “hoax!”, rather like Buster who claims that all witnesses, doctors and police were “brought into” the conspiracy, when his looney theories are proven wrong.
The pair of you should really do deeper research if you wish to have some credibility in your “knowledge” this affair.
JASON says: Actually, it’s YOU that has the same conspiracies in common with Buster aka Brian Doyle. You both ridiculously claim Jimi Hendrix had phony procedures performed on him at the hospital when he was already confirmed dead for hours since 1970.
You have zero credibility and zero facts. You piece together nonsense to support your phony theory just like Buster does.
I’ve easily debunked all your phony claims with documented medical evidence and expert witness testimony.
You have never “proven me wrong” because you have no St. Mary Abbots Hospital medical document to prove your phony theory that Jimi “was alive” to have phony procedures. If he did, a medical document would exist and it would have been already produced decades ago.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival and his press agent Les Perrin also confirmed it as well as did every major media outlet on 9/18/70.
Yes, you are a hoaxer. You ignore every single piece of documented medical evidence as well as expert testimony given by Dr. Bob Brown and Dr. Rufus Crompton. You attack the doctors’ credibility as well as the science. That’s what Buster the clown does. That’s what a hoaxer does. That’s what YOU do.
Where is Jimi Hendrix’s medical document that states he was “still alive” to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital? That document would exist if there were actually procedures performed since a hospital documents everything. Where is it Mr. “Researcher”?
Hi Jason, This guy likes to think of himself as an expert in the Jimi Hendrix story, having all the information and knowledge. He needs to produce some real evidence if he wants to be seen as a credible and serious researcher. Like Buster who was fixated on Bannister’s phony wine removal, so is this guy on hospital procedures performed on Jimi. With all those supposed procedures you would think they would have saved Jimi. I wonder why that didn’t happen? 😏
Hi Ivana,
He’s no expert. And like Buster aka Brian Doyle, he reads a “book” and then claims to be a “great researcher” based on what the author of a book wants him to know. He takes an inaccurate claim that the author wrote and then attempts to create his own fictional version just like Buster does. This is exactly how hoaxers operate.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 like Buster, has no “evidence” because none exists for the bogus claims he makes. When they are asked to produce any kind of evidence, they immediately become defensive and then disappear for awhile, only to come back to argue the same phony theory all over again. They are just trolls who like to argue nonsense and can never produce anything for their fake conspiracy theories. Brian Doyle has been at this same scam for over a decade and he has no more “evidence” today in 2021 than when he started with this b.s. back in 2009. 12 years of nothing because there is nothing for him to ever produce for his bogus wine hoax.
Like I said, if Jimi was “still alive” to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital St. Mary Abbots Hospital would have confirmed it and so would have Jimi’s press agent Les Perrin. There also would have been a documented hospital report on these so called “procedures”. No document exists and both the hospital and Perrin said Jimi was a DOA. Ridiculous how he tries to argue against stuff that was already documented and told nearly 51 years ago which it will be in another month.
Jimi was supposed to be “alive and breathing” according to our “new friend”, so as you said, Jimi should have been saved with simple “CPR procedures”.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: The fact that John Suau also told ex- police Superintendant Dennis Care that the accounts that had been published in the books (Straight Ahead fanzine and Tony Brown’s books) were incorrect suggests that Dee may have initially pre-briefed (bribed?) the two men in order to gain favour with Kathy. The two men had of course been accused by Monika of having sat the struggling Jimi up in the ambulance, so they would have been only too pleased to clear their name by saying that Jimi was already dead at the Samarkand! Research (by Glebeek) has also revealed that there was in fact a rumour going round St. Abbotts hospital at the time that the ambulancemen HAD sat Jimi up and precipitated his death!
JASON says: This is the modus operandi of a hoaxer, they always use claims based on rumors, hearsay, innuendos, “may haves” while attempting to turn it into “evidence” based on nothing but crap.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 tries to discredit the original testimony of John Saua while claiming Dee “bribed him” because HENDRIXGUIDE8721 knows the testimony refutes his hoax. That’s what a hoaxer does, they push an asinine claim trying to discredit evidence that refutes them.
Medical evidence from Jimi’s official autopsy confirmed that he was not alive in the ambulance since a partially digested medium sized rice meal was detected inside his stomach. If Jimi was “still alive” in the ambulance, the rice meal would have already been digested by 11:45 when Jimi reached the hospital. The fact the rice was still there proves Jimi died in the early morning hours.
Also Dr. Bob Brown in several interviews stated Jimi Hendrix was dead for hours.
Dr. John Bannister described the rigor mortis in Jimi’s body and the black rotting mouth. That only happens to someone who’s been dead for hours.
Jimi’s press agent Les Perrin would have told the media on 9/18/70 that Jimi was “still alive” if that was in fact the case. What did he tell the media? He said “Jimi’s body was taken to the hospital by ambulance where he was certified dead on arrival”. A press agent of a major superstar would never go public with that information about his client if it wasn’t accurate.
Plus the hospital St. Mary Abbots Hospital gave a full media press conference with Dr. Bob Brown as a spokesman declaring Hendrix dead on arrival.
What does HENDRIXGUIDE8721 have for his phony theory? A decades later claim by Dennis Care and his own made up conspiracy of Dee “bribing” the ambulance men. That’s exactly the same fraud that Buster the clown does with his hoax. They have no evidence so they make up phony hypotheticals and claim that as evidence. That’s a hoax folks!
JASON says: “Who cares. None of this changes the fact Jimi was dead for hours and was declared dead on arrival by St. Mary Abbots Hospital.”
WRONG. Arrivals aren’t declared dead in the ambulance. No papers are written out. If they are determined dead in the ambulance, they go to the morgue.
The doctor(s) who examined Jimi in the ambulance decided that he should be rushed into the Emergency room. You think that is ever done with 8 hour dead bodies? Well you do in fact and you are living a fantasy.
JASON says: “Actually, it’s YOU that has the same conspiracies in common with Buster aka Brian Doyle. You both ridiculously claim Jimi Hendrix had phony procedures performed on him at the hospital when he was already confirmed dead for hours since 1970.”
I have zero in common with the other guy, who thinks like you that Jimi had been dead for hours. You talk of “phony proceedures” when you know full well that your star witness Bob Brown confirmed that Jimi was being rushed to “The Emergency Room” as he walked alongside the moving trolly.
Dr. Seifert confirmed in a filmed interview by Emmy Award winner David Kramer that Jimi was between life and death when he worked performed resuscitation proceedures.
JASON says: “Dr. John Bannister described the rigor mortis in Jimi’s body and the black rotting mouth. That only happens to someone who’s been dead for hours.”
Ha! So you now believe fraud Bannister??? He wasn’t even describing Jimi. Read his statements to the press. He said he had a vivid memory of the case – a man over 7 feet tall! He grafted that memory onto the case of Jimi. Get your facts straight!
JASON says: “Medical evidence from Jimi’s official autopsy confirmed that he was not alive in the ambulance since a partially digested medium sized rice meal was detected inside his stomach. If Jimi was “still alive” in the ambulance, the rice meal would have already been digested by 11:45 when Jimi reached the hospital. The fact the rice was still there proves Jimi died in the early morning hours.”
Utter nonsense. You obviously haven’t researched rice digestion, which is greatly inhibited by the consumption of barbiturates, amphetamine alcohol and even sleep. You didn’t even know that Jimi and Monika went for drinks in Soho after Kameron’s party and that information is in one of the most famous Hendrix biographies ever written – Electric Gypsy.
I think the only book you two have read is Tony Brown’s The Final Days.
Look at Ivana – she didn’t even know that Kathy had an agenda as regards Monika when she began her investigation. Amateur hour here with you two.
Knowing that Jimi wasn’t long-dead on arrival is in no way a hoax or a belief in a conspiracy. Hilariously, you quote fraud Bannister to back up your out-dated argument.
Credibility zero.
I only do this to counter all the lconstant ies and innacuracies surrounding this case.
Kathy had no agenda against Monika this was suggested by others. Monika thought Kathy was motivated by jealousy, but Kathy retaliated by saying that she wanted to find out what happened to Jimi and that’s what prompted her investigation. Please don’t try to trip me up because you will never succeed.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: WRONG. Arrivals aren’t declared dead in the ambulance. No papers are written out. If they are determined dead in the ambulance, they go to the morgue. The doctor(s) who examined Jimi in the ambulance decided that he should be rushed into the Emergency room. You think that is ever done with 8 hour dead bodies? Well you do in fact and you are living a fantasy.
JASON says: LOL. Jimi wasn’t “declared dead in the ambulance” nor was he “examined in the ambulance” by doctors. He was officially declared dead after the formality resuscitation attempt. The doctors who examined Jimi inside the hospital said he was dead for hours when he arrived at the hospital. That’s why no “phony CPR procedures” were ever performed on Jimi and why no medical documents of “phony procedures” exist. Again, you have no clue about the Jimi Hendrix case and it’s hilarious!
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – Dr. John Bannister
“He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of someone who had been dead for some time. Hendrix was dead for hours rather than minutes.” – Dr. John Bannister
“He was put on a monitor, but it [ECG trace] was flat. I pounded his heart [CPR] a couple of times, but there was no point, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
“I was at St. Mary Abbots Hospital when Jimi Hendrix was brought in dead and unfortunately there was nothing I could do for him. He died of an overdose early in the morning and this was hours later.” – Dr. Bob Brown
JASON says: Does this sound like a man that doctors would decide to perform phony emergency procedures on? ALL 3 doctors agreed Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed it to the entire world on 9/18/70. This is documented evidence and HENDRIXGUIDE8721 has nothing for his hoax.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: I have zero in common with the other guy, who thinks like you that Jimi had been dead for hours. You talk of “phony proceedures” when you know full well that your star witness Bob Brown confirmed that Jimi was being rushed to “The Emergency Room” as he walked alongside the moving trolly.
Dr. Seifert confirmed in a filmed interview by Emmy Award winner David Kramer that Jimi was between life and death when he worked performed resuscitation proceedures.
JASON says: You have a lot in common with hoaxer Brian Doyle aka Buster. You both falsely claim that Jimi Hendrix was “still alive” to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital and you are both unable to produce a hospital medical document confirming your bogus conspiracy theory. Both of you spout off nonsense providing no evidence and attempt to discredit anybody that refutes you.
Dr. Bob Brown said Jimi was dead for hours. And you still don’t understand anything about hospital protocol. Any person who comes through the emergency doors by ambulance is rushed to an emergency room even if they are dead. A formality resuscitation is performed which is required by law.
Dr. Siefert made up a new phony account years later for a conspiracy theory documentary. Years earlier he officially confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival as did both Bannister and Brown.
“He was put on a monitor, but it [ECG trace] was flat. I pounded his heart [CPR] a couple of times, but there was no point, he was dead.” – Dr. Martin Siefert
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Ha! So you now believe fraud Bannister??? He wasn’t even describing Jimi. Read his statements to the press. He said he had a vivid memory of the case – a man over 7 feet tall! He grafted that memory onto the case of Jimi. Get your facts straight!
JASON says: Ambulance Men John Saua and Reginald Jones, Police Officer Ian Smith, Doctor Siefert, Doctor Brown, and Jimi’s press agent Les Perrin all back up Bannister’s account of Jimi Hendrix being dead for hours. Do you have 7 men on the official record stating Jimi Hendrix was alive? The answer is no.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Utter nonsense. You obviously haven’t researched rice digestion, which is greatly inhibited by the consumption of barbiturates, amphetamine alcohol and even sleep. You didn’t even know that Jimi and Monika went for drinks in Soho after Kameron’s party and that information is in one of the most famous Hendrix biographies ever written – Electric Gypsy.
I think the only book you two have read is Tony Brown’s The Final Days.
Look at Ivana – she didn’t even know that Kathy had an agenda as regards Monika when she began her investigation. Amateur hour here with you two.
JASON says: HENDRIXGUIDE8721 clown again dismisses documented medical science from Jimi’s official autopsy and a confirmation from a famous renowned pathologist but believes an inaccurate claim from what he read in a book instead. Absolutely hilarious!
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Knowing that Jimi wasn’t long-dead on arrival is in no way a hoax or a belief in a conspiracy. Hilariously, you quote fraud Bannister to back up your out-dated argument.Credibility zero. I only do this to counter all the lconstant ies and innacuracies surrounding this case.
JASON says: Promoting a bogus conspiracy theory that Jimi Hendrix was “still alive” to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital is indeed a hoax because Jimi Hendrix was certified dead on arrival on 9/18/70 and it’s a documented fact. And you have no real evidence to counter that except for false claims you read out of a book or a decades later new changed story that you quote.
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival.” – Les Perrin Jimi Hendrix’s press agent
Dee Mitchell was a con artist with serious mental issues. She made up some really awful things about Kathy, and to even suggest that the ambulance men would be taken in by someone like that is just stupid. The two ambulance officers would never have risked their reputations to accept a “bribe” from a person they knew very briefly. Typical tin foil hatter stuff substituting fact for fiction. Les Perrin would have been very sure of his facts before making a statement regarding a Jimi.
That’s because HENDRIXGUIDE8721 is a hoaxer and needs to discredit the official Hendrix record so he makes up a lie out of thin air that Dee “bribed” the ambulance men. Classic tactic used by well known fraud and con artist Brian Doyle to push his hoax.
Les Perrin was a famous and well respected press agent for superstar musicians and actors. He would not put out false information on the death of his client Jimi Hendrix because all of his other clients would fire him for fear of damaging their reputation. St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival and Les Perrin confirmed it to the media as well.
These hoaxers miserably fail trying to rewrite history when the event that already happened is officially documented. That’s like trying to claim 30 years later the losing team of the World Series, Super Bowl, Stanley Cup, NBA Finals were the real winners and the winning team actually lost.
Elvis Presley “The King Of Rock and Roll” died on this day August 16, 1977 but hoaxers still make up the ridiculous claim he is “still alive”. This “article” comes from Weekly World News. Make sure to look at the link and see Elvis in the wheelchair. LOL.
ELVIS SEEN AT GRACELAND ON HIS 85th BIRTHDAY!
July 14, 2021 by Frank Lake
After years of speculation the truth can finally be told: Elvis Presley not only faked his death in 1977, he’s still alive today (at age 85) – and we’ve got the photograph to prove it!
The amateur, black-and-white snapshot was taken by a tourist on November 4, 2019. It clearly shows the senior superstar resting in a wheelchair on the grounds of his Graceland mansion in Memphis, Tenn.
And while nobody can say for sure if the King is back at Graceland to stay, Presley insiders hint that the 85-year-old legend could go public at any minute if he gets an indication that fans still care.
“I’m not saying Elvis is alive, but I’ve always suspected it,” says a close friend who was a member of the great singer’s “Memphis Mafia.”
“If that picture of him in the wheelchair is authentic, and it sure looks to me like it is then you can bet Elvis set the whole thing up to gauge public opinion.
“Elvis isn’t stupid. In fact, he’s one of the smartest people I’ve ever known. If he faked his death and kept himself out of the public eye for 43 years, he wouldn’t let somebody take his picture unless he wanted it done.
“I think that’s what might be happening. He’s a sensitive guy and he would never come out of hiding if he felt the fans don’t care about him anymore.
“I believe he’s testing the water before he does something drastic like go on TV to tell us he’s alive – and he’s back.”
DID HE FAKE HIS DEATH?
Nobody officially involved in the maintenance of the Presley estate enterprises has publicly acknowledged that Elvis faked his death of a heart attack on Aug. 16, 1977.
And they certainly aren’t forthcoming with new information now.
But if the story develops along the lines suggested by the ex-Presley insider, they might have to. And that includes The King’s former wife, Priscilla, an only child, rock-star-in-her-own-right Lisa Marie.
“There are plenty of good reasons for Elvis to come out of hiding now,” says Wes Thomas an investigative reporter and Presley expert who has written extensively on the performer.
“He’s certainly no spring chicken. And after the recent death of Prince, Tom Petty, Glenn Frey, he might have stopped to reflect on his own mortality and decided that if he’s ever going to tell fans the truth he better do it now.
“That would be in keeping with the kind of man Elvis was. He loved his fans and he never wanted to lie to them or cheat them.
“If he faked his death to escape the pressures of superstardom, those who know Elvis would tell you they always expected him to come out of hiding and explain everything.
“What’s really intriguing me about that picture is the wheelchair. It could mean he’s had a stroke and lost the use of his legs, or perhaps he has an unsteady gait. Then again, he might be using a prop to generate interest among fans.”
PHOTO ANALYSIS
Photo analysts commissioned by Weekly World News say the photograph, taken by a 53-year-old woman who says she sneaked on the grounds of Graceland through an unlocked gate after it had closed for the day, has not been altered or retouched.
And while they can’t say for sure whether the senior citizen in the wheelchair is Elvis or a mere look-alike, a national known again expert says with 98 percent certainty: it is The King.
“Judging from my analysis of blowups, the man is Elvis or, if not Elvis, someone who aged exactly as our computer models say Elvis would have aged – which is a virtual impossibility,” says Phil Tellers of Washington, who has worked with police departments nationwide to “age” abducted children in computer models.
The remarkable sighting follows on the heels on the claim of a waitress who says she served Elvis a sandwich at a Laguna Beach, CA restaurant.
As Elvis fans know all too well, circumstances surrounding The King’s death in 1977 were mysterious at best.
Mourners who were there said Presley was sweating profusely as he lay in the casket before his death. And that has fueled persistent and compelling rumors that he was alive.
“If it’s truly Elvis I want to just die!” said Tad Hillstrom from Cheraw, S.C. when he saw the wheelchair-bound man photo. He was convinced, “I know it. That is Elvis!”
https://weeklyworldnews.com/celebs/176795/elvis-seen-at-graceland-on-his-85th-birthday/
Hi Jason, This is just priceless, I don’t think I’ve ever laughed so much. There you have it, if all these people are sure they all saw Elvis then it must be true NOT! 😜
Hi Ivana,
Yeah these stories are really funny. I used to thumb through the pages at the grocery store and laugh when I was waiting in line. Love that fake wheelchair picture.
Sounds like something Buster and HENDRIXGUIDE8721 would write for their Jimi Hendrix “phony procedures” hoax. Nothing but hypotheticals, rumors, hearsay, false claims all wrapped up into one big phony conspiracy. But most of all, there’s not a single shred of evidence that can be produced to make the conspiracy be true.
Our two friends would be very well suited to working for Weekly World News. Here are some of the stories they could follow: Jimi Hendrix seen sharing a bottle of wine with Dr. Bannister, visiting his family in Seattle, recording at Electric Lady, leaving the Samarkand Hotel, having dinner with Kathy and her husband, and arriving at St Mary’s Hospital for his monthly check-up. 😀
Haha….they certainly would. Their phony conspiracy theories sounds like something you would read in Weekly World News. They should both apply for jobs so they can have an audience who enjoys reading nonsense articles.
here’s a few new editions to the Weekly World News site just for them:
“Jimi Hendrix and Elvis Presley Record A Rap Duet”
“Buster and HENDRIXGUIDE8721 Interview Jimi Hendrix on His ‘Life Saving Procedures’ 51 Years Ago”
“Aliens Made Wine Appear And Disappear At The Samarkand Hotel”
“Dee Mitchell Used Supernatural Powers To ‘Bribe’ Ambulance Men”
“Sharon Lawrence Used a Spiritualist Medium To Contact Jack Meehan”
“Jimi Hendrix Had Magic Powers To Come Back To Life To Have Phony Procedures Performed On Him But Then Only To Die Again”
“HENDRIXGUIDE And Buster Are The Two World’s Greatest Jimi Hendrix Researchers”
“HENDRIXGUIDE8721 and Buster The Clown Finally Produce Jimi Hendrix’s Phony Procedures Medical Document”
“Jimi Hendrix took 15 Vesparax And Still Survived”
“Jimi Hendrix Is Still Living At The Samarkand Hotel with Monika Dannemann: Dannemann Was Spotted Purchasing A Pack Of Cigarettes And 5 Bottles Of Red Wine”
“Michael Jeffery Used Teleportation To Go From London To Spain in 2 Seconds”
“Dr. Siefert Went Back In Time To 1970 So He Could Save The Life Of Jimi Hendrix When He Was Already Dead On Arrival”
Just love it, Jason! Maybe you could sent some of these suggestions to the editors of Weekly World News I’m sure they would be saying why didn’t we think of that.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: Utter nonsense. You obviously haven’t researched rice digestion, which is greatly inhibited by the consumption of barbiturates, amphetamine alcohol and even sleep.
JASON says: LOL. This is exactly the reason why your “phony procedures” hoax is just a scam and medical science easily debunks your phony story.
According to you, Jimi Hendrix took “one” Vesparax pill after 7am and then “took more” later on.
Jimi Hendrix ate his rice meal in the 11 o’clock hour near midnight according to guests at Kameron’s party who were also eating a rice dinner as well.
So, that would be 7 hours later when you claim Jimi took “his first” barbiturate. After 7 hours, Jimi’s rice meal would have been fully digested and no rice would have been detected in his stomach.
Dr. Teare found a partially digested medium sized rice meal in Jimi’s stomach during the autopsy which means Jimi died in the early morning hours before the meal could even be fully digested. That’s evidence from medical science and the human body, not phony stories you made up from nonsense you read from a book. That’s not “research”, that’s called being gullible just to believe anything that you read out of a book.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says: You didn’t even know that Jimi and Monika went for drinks in Soho after Kameron’s party and that information is in one of the most famous Hendrix biographies ever written – Electric Gypsy.
JASON says: So, you read a phony story from a book and believe it to be true. Once again, that’s just being gullible. Authors of these types of books prey on gullible people like you because they know you will believe whatever nonsense they print.
You want to believe Jimi was out all early morning having “drinks with Monika” after she berated him at Harvey’s and caused a scene at Kameron’s party.
If Jimi was out having “drinks” all morning with Monika then that would push Jimi’s death hours later to where his rice meal would have been already digested.
The medical evidence of a stomach full of rice refutes this phony story.
Jimi Hendrix died in the early morning hours no later than 4am which Dr. Rufus Crompton estimated due to the amount of rice found in Jimi’s stomach. If Jimi was out “having drinks” at 3-4am and took his overdose hours later at 7am then there would have been no rice detected in Jimi’s stomach. Rice was found which proves Jimi was not out having drinks….Jimi was dying from a lethal barbiturate overdose at that time.
Another phony story has been easily debunked by medical science and the human body.
Hoaxers can never argue against science. They can only try to discredit it with fake stories they read from a book. It makes them look even more foolish than they already are.
No-where did Monika say she and Jimi were having drinks in Soho after leaving Kameron’s party. What she does mention is arriving home at about 8.30 and having dinner with Jimi back at the Samarkand Hotel. This story conveniently cuts out the time spent at Harvey’s place where the argument took place in order to support Monika’s claim that Jimi asked her to to drive him to Kameron’s party at around 1.45 am from the Samarkand Hotel. This is where she concocted the story that they were not Jimi’s friends and he didn’t particularly like them. This was just an attempt on Monika’s part to enhance her romantic status with Jimi. In reality Jimi went from Harvey’s place to Kameron’s party where Monika wasn’t invited to attend by Jimi. She made a nuisance of herself by insisting to talk to Jimi over the intercom so much so that the guests at the party repeatedly told her to go away. I think if Jimi hadn’t left his beloved guitar at Monika’s place then he most likely would never have seen her again.
If Jimi went from Kameron’s party to having drinks in Soho then his blood alcohol level would have been much higher than the autopsy revealed. Jimi had also been drinking at Harvey’s place. This is another hoax story.
Ivana, this hoax is all starting to make sense. You need to look at this from a hoaxers ton foil hat prospective. LOL
Put on your tin foil hats folks!
Jimi was indeed out with Monika having drinks in the early morning hours in Soho on September 18th. Jimi was passionately professing his love to Monika as the wedding plans were being finalized over a glass of wine in a cozy corner. Jimi forgot all about the row at Harvey’s a couple of hours earlier and the scene Monika just made at Kameron’s only a few minutes ago.
Suddenly, a mafia goon appeared in Monika’s sight. She caught a glimpse of him in the corner of her right eye as she touched her nose as an indication of the job she was supposed to perform.
Monika walked up to the bartender and proceeded to order 5 bottles of wine. After she paid for her large wine order she struggled to carry the 5 bottles back to the table. Jimi decided to then head back to the Samarkand to celebrate.
As Monika stood up from the table she gave an exaggerated wink to the mafia goon that “the plan” was ready to be put in action.
The mafia goon walked over to the bar to telephone the Black Panther who was patiently waiting outside the phone booth at the Samarkand to let them know the happy couple were on their way back to the room.
The Black Panther informed members of the mafia, FBI, CIA, MI-5 and MI-6, along with some London thugs that it was all about to go down.
Michael Jeffery slowly appeared from the shadows smoking a cigarette with a blue print map for where everybody was supposed to be in position. He frantically shouted orders and gave each man specific instructions to follow.
As the happy couple entered the room and closed the door, Monika appeared in the doorway and began to flash the special hand signals that Jeffery ordered her to give as the final act to perform the “murder”.
After Monika went back in the room, all the “murderers” rushed inside and took their positions with a few holding down Hendrix.
Michael Jeffery with an evil laugh and twisting his thin black mustache told Hendrix what was about to happen him. Jeffery slowly began taking 9 pills into his hand moving closer towards Hendrix. Jeffery’s 5 henchmen followed close behind each holding a bottle of wine.
Jeffery angrily forced the 9 pills inside Hendrix’s mouth and then screamed “POUR!”
One by one each goon poured a bottle of wine inside of Hendrix until the bottle reached it’s last drop.
“5 bottles should be sufficient,” shouted Jeffery.
As the henchmen looked on with satisfaction, Jeffery leaned over to Monika’s right ear and in a low evil voice snarled “You remember nothing about this!”
Jeffery walking out the door, was telling his henchmen how the big “cover up” was going to happen even until the year 2021. He also spoke of his elaborate plan of how he would fake his own death 3 years later in 1973.
As the last Black Panther was leaving the room, he curiously asked Jeffery “What do we do now boss?”
“Get me the hell to Spain!”, exclaimed Jeffery.
JASON says: See how easy it is to spin a hoax?
All you need is a ridiculous conspiracy theory with a vivid imagination and gullible souls to believe in it. I bet you anything some fool out there would believe this phony story I made up. I personally think it’s better than anything Buster aka Brian Doyle could ever write.
Cheers!
So that’s what I’ve been doing wrong so from now on I’ll always be wearing my tin foil hat. Beam me up Scotty! and may the force be with me. LOL.
Our “new friend” needs to answer for his phony theory in which he claims Jimi Hendrix was “still breathing” and “still alive” when he reached the hospital.
#1
Both ambulance men confirmed that Jimi’s airways were completely blocked with dry vomit.
Jimi’s autopsy report concluded that Jimi had 400 ml of fluid in his chest and both lungs were congested. Vomit was also found in his bronchi tubes.
So, how in the world is it possible for Jimi Hendrix to “still be breathing” with completely blocked airways, fluid in his chest, and vomit blocking his bronchi tubes?
#2
Both ambulance men John Saua and Reginald Jones confirmed Jimi Hendrix was dead at the Samarkand Hotel.
Officer Ian Smith also confirmed Jimi Hendrix was dead at the Samarkand Hotel.
Doctor Bob Brown confirmed Jimi Hendrix was dead when he was wheeled in on the trolley.
Doctor John Bannister confirmed Jimi Hendrix was dead on admission to the hospital.
Doctor Martin Siefert confirmed Jimi Hendrix was dead when he pounded his heart twice.
St. Mary Abbots Hospital certified Jimi Hendrix to be dead on arrival.
Les Perrin, Jimi Hendrix’s press agent confirmed to the media that Jimi Hendrix was certifed to be dead on arrival.
Every single major media news outlet reported that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival after St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed it in their media press conference.
So in a new bogus claim 30 years later, how can Jimi Hendrix magically still “have some “breathing going on” and have “some life left in him” when 30 years earlier he was already certified dead on arrival?
Hi Jason, Makes perfect sense. If Jimi was alive when he arrived at the hospital the procedures performed on him would have been very different: it wouldn’t have been just a matter of pounding his chest a couple of times. Both ambulance officers recognised Jimi’s condition as a drugs overdose so I’m certain they would have started treating him for that if Jimi was still alive. They wouldn’t have spoken about dry vomit all the way down if they hadn’t used the aspiration and the condition of Jimi’s body if they hadn’t seen those things for themselves.
Treatment for Barbiturate overdose; Blood test, charcoal, breathing tube/ventilator, IV fluids, EKG, and chest X-Ray.
Our “new friend” continuously lies about the ambulance men using a “respirator” on Jimi. They used an aspirator in order to suck out the dry vomit that was completely blocking his airways. Both men said their attempt was useless and Jimi was already dead, but were required by law to work on Jimi even though he was already dead until he reached the hospital.
And the only reason Jimi was taken to the hospital, is that the police told the ambulance men to take him there so they didn’t have to fill out police forms all day on a dead John Doe. It wasn’t because Jimi was “still alive” and could be saved by phony procedures.
So, even though Jimi was already long dead, the protocol was to treat him as an emergency until he reached the hospital. Once he arrived, the doctors could see that he was long dead and the pounding of his heart twice was the “resuscitation attempt” which was only a formality. Bannister and Siefert both confirmed that in their official statements. But 30 years later, Siefert decided to magically make Jimi barely alive with “some breathing going on” for a conspiracy theory documentary. That’s why his new story is absurd and only gullible fools would believe it.
But HENDRIXGUIDE8721 is so clueless about the Jimi Hendrix case he believes that Jimi Hendrix was “still alive” after 7 men all confirmed Jimi was dead for hours. Not to mention, St. Mary Abbots Hospital certified Jimi Hendrix to be dead on arrival and both ambulance men described Jimi’s bladder and bowels spilling all over the inside of the ambulance. That only happens to someone who has been dead for a long time because the body no longer has any functions. And that’s not something Dee Mitchell could invent herself or “bribe” the ambulance men to say.
But HENDRIXGUIDE8721 ignores the fact that 7 men and a hospital confirmed Jimi Hendrix dead on arrival and instead wants to live in fantasyland believing Jimi was “still alive” to have phony procedures based on a 30 year later phony new version of events. Totally ridiculous.
Ivana, you made an excellent point. Indeed the procedures would have been totally different if Jimi was “still alive” and that’s what separates reality from decades later fiction. Not one person would have said Jimi Hendrix was dead if he was “still alive”. Not one doctor would have said Jimi was dead if he was “still alive”. The hospital never would have issued an official statement declaring Hendrix was dead on arrival if he was “still alive”. They would have spoken about “life saving procedures” and there would be a medical document to prove it. Les Perrin wouldn’t have confirmed to the media that Jimi Hendrix was certified dead on arrival. He would have spoken about the “life saving attempt” to save him. And finally, Jimi’s death certificate wouldn’t have read “suffocation due to barbiturate intoxication” if he had life saving procedures. Jimi died at the Samarkand Hotel and the vomit blocking his airways that both ambulance men described is what killed Jimi and stopped him from breathing even though the lethal barbiturate overdose still would have killed him anyway. None of this should be difficult to comprehend.
Hi Jason, Really good point about Seifert changing his story. It’s almost as if once he became aware who the patient was, Seifert decided to exaggerate the role he played. If any procedures were performed on Jimi then some official document would have existed, and I’m sure this would have been copied and made its way into countless biographies just like the death certificate and autopsy information. Yet to see it reproduced anywhere.
Hi Ivana,
Siefert clearly confirmed Jimi was dead on admission and there was nothing he could do to save him. Then in the year 2000, he invents a brand new story that “there was some breathing going on” and “some life” which is a total lie because Jimi was a certified DOA on 9/18/70. Our “new friend” wants to use this phony story as his “evidence” for his hoax, which is a joke, since it’s a blatant contradicting claim. How can you take a guy like Siefert seriously who gives two different versions to one single event? He confirmed Jimi was dead on admission and then later on he was magically “working hard to save his life”.
Sounds like Siefert wanted a piece of the limelight like Bannister was having when he pretended to be a “hero” to “save Jimi’s life”. Don’t they realize how foolish they look when they already both confirmed that Jimi was already dead when he reached the hospital? How the hell could they be saving a dead body? lol.
Siefert’s new version is absolutely ridiculous and it appears he tried to exaggerate it enough so he could pretend to be a “hero” while still confirming Jimi was dead. “Whether or not you want to call that life is a different story” he said, which means he’s just full of crap but was carefully choosing his words.
Any real procedures would have been documented on Jimi’s official medical hospital record and would have been published as part of the history of his death. St. Mary Abbots Hospital would have confirmed to the media on 9/18/70 that Jimi Hendrix was admitted and had “life saving procedures” if he actually did. And so would have Les Perrin, Jimi’s press agent, if it actually happened. What did they say? They said that “Jimi’s body was taken to the hospital and he was certified dead on arrival”. Not one word about any “phony procedures” because it never happened. Jimi Hendrix was dead at the Samarkand.
But then 20-30 years later, we get two new phony versions from Bannister and Siefert about “imaginary wine” and “still some breathing going on”. How would it be possible for Jimi to still have “some breathing going on” with completely blocked airways and fluid in his chest which would prevent him from breathing? Not to mention he was already confirmed dead by both ambulance men, a cop, and Dr. Bob Brown. Also, both Siefert and Bannister are on the official record stating Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival in their original statements. That’s why Bannister’s and Siefert’s later phony tales are nothing but pure fiction and they both destroyed their credibility for a little publicity and allowed hoaxers to use their tales for a scam.
Hi Jason, What makes me laugh is the supposed life saving procedures which obviously failed to save Jimi’s life. LOL. Both Seifert and Bannister wanted to enhance their own positions and look like heroes like you said Jason. They wanted to appear as if they actually did more for Jimi beyond the minimum procedures.
All of these “procedures” on a dead man with completely blocked airways and fluid in his chest….completely ridiculous.
BANNISTER ORIGINAL STATEMENT:
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.”
BANNISTER NEW VERSION:
“We worked hard on him but he was well and truly dead.”
SEIFERT ORIGINAL STATEMENT:
“Jimi was rushed into the re-sus room. He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.”
SEIFERT NEW PHONY VERSION:
“To say that he [Jimi] was dead when they [Reginald Jones and John Suau] got to the [Samarkand] hotel is probably incorrect. When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath. I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead. I personally couldn’t find any sign of alcohol or anything like that on him when I examined him.”
SEIFERT’S LAME EXPLANATION OF HIS NEW PHONY VERSION:
“I would stick with version #2, the monitor was very inactive but obviously we needed to try to resuscitate him if possible and that is what we did.”
JASON SAYS:
So, both doctors confirmed Jimi Hendrix dead on arrival and said “resuscitation” was only a formality in their original statements which is exactly the case since that’s what both ambulance men, a cop, Les Perrin, and St. Mary Abbots Hospital confirmed.
Then years later, both doctors decide to put on a phony Superman cape pretending to be heroes by “working hard” to save Jimi’s life. Look how fake these new versions are as they are trying hard to make it appear they “worked hard to save Jimi’s life”. Seifert confirmed Jimi was dead but then totally changes the script and says “that’s probably incorrect”. He didn’t say it WAS incorrect because then he could have gotten sued for lying, so he threw in a ‘probably’. He then says there was “some life” but then questions if that is actually life. Seifert chose his words carefully so he could still say Jimi was dead while wanting to play a hero. Seifert was clearly lying and wrecked his credibility in the process. All this does is allow hoaxers to use his lying words to promote their scam. Disgraceful.
After Seifert was questioned on his contradictions, he gave an equally lame response trying to add credibility to his lie but he failed miserably. He said to “stick with the 2nd version” which makes him look even more like a fool having two different versions for one single event. He then said the monitor was inactive and they tried to resuscitate him ‘if possible’ but Seifert never confirmed he did. So, Seifert wants it both ways and looks like a total clown in doing so. How can anybody take him seriously with this lame story?
Seems to me both Bannister and Seifert wanted to be remembered in Jimi Hendrix history and they felt pounding Jimi’s heart twice wouldn’t make them get written in the history books so they decided to exaggerate their roles to appear to be heroes of trying to save an already long dead Jimi Hendrix. What they didn’t realize is that their original statements are what’s written in Hendrix history and their recent lies are ignored or forgotten altogether.
I have a feeling neither of these two remembered what happened that morning and were just making it up as they went along. They didn’t have a clue who Jimi Hendrix was so they concocted two versions of the same event and it seemed like it was up to the reader to decide which version was the most plausible. Just the fact that Seifert said “stick with the 2nd version” confirms that. It probably got them their 15 minutes of fame but that’s about it.
Making it up at they want along is indeed the case.
SEIFERT’S NEW PHONY 2000 VERSION:
“There was some breathing going on whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breathe, I then decided to shut down the oxygen and declare that he was dead.”
JASON SAYS:
Seifert first claims “there was some breathing going on”.
Then he says he “couldn’t get him to breathe”.
So he is telling us a contradiction in the same sentence.
How can there be “some breathing going on” when Seifert just said he couldn’t get Jimi to breathe?
Seifert was lying and making up a phony story as he went along in this conspiracy theory documentary.
Seifert is correct in saying that “he couldn’t get Jimi to breathe” because Jimi was already dead but was lying about the “some breathing going on”. Jimi had completely blocked airways and fluid in his chest so there was no possible way for there to be “some breathing going on”.
“Some breathing” is considered life but Seifert doesn’t believe that to be the case as he questions if that’s really life.
So, it’s totally obvious Seifert knew Jimi was dead but wanted to exaggerate a new tale to make it appear he tried to make a valiant effort to save Jimi.
SEIFERT’S NEW PHONY 2000 VERSION:
“To say that he [Jimi] was dead when they [Reginald Jones and John Suau] got to the [Samarkand] hotel is probably incorrect. When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead.”
SEIFERT’S ORIGINAL STATEMENT:
“He [Jimi] was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple of times, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead. We didn’t work on him anything like an hour, just a few minutes. I would have done anything to save him, but it was too late, he was dead.”
JASON SAYS:
So 30 years later, Jimi Hendrix magically “still had some life left in him” when 30 years before, Seifert confirmed Jimi was dead and nothing could be done for him.
Seifert adds a “probably incorrect” in his new tale. How can it be “probably incorrect”? Either Jimi was still alive or he was dead. It can’t be “probably”. Seifert uses “probably incorrect” because he knows Jimi was dead but wants to exaggerate that he did something to save him.
In 1970, Seifert confirmed Jimi was dead and he didn’t work on him besides pounding his heart a couple of times. In 2000, he claims Jimi Hendrix “still had some life” and he was “working hard”. What a freaking joke.
That’s why the only thing you need to go on is the documented medical evidence. That never lies and is the only thing that is truly accurate. Too many people lied and was just looking for a little Hendrix fame wanting to be remembered in history.
Hi Ivana,
Our “old friend” and our “new friend” both use the same bogus stories for their Jimi Hendrix hoax.
Buster and HENDRIXGUIDE8721 both claim Jimi was “still alive” to have phony procedures performed on him at the hospital. Except Buster admits Jimi was dead at the Samarkand, but then has him magically come back to life to have a “wine suctioning” by Bannister, or sometimes by both Bannister and Seifert depending on how he wants to present his hoax.
Both our “friends” use the same bogus excuse that the doctors had no way of knowing how long Jimi was dead even though they were trained medical professionals and a body that’s been dead for many hours would be totally obvious due to its condition.
It’s nonsense like this that both of them use to discredit Jimi’s official record so they can still push their scam. It just goes to show you that all hoaxers think alike and use the same b.s. lines.
Hi Jason, They both use the same basic information to spin their hoax. There are similarities in their stories like you said, and they manipulated the facts to suit their story; the truth doesn’t matter to them because they have an agenda and that is to get as many people as possible to believe them and jump onto the conspiracy theory bandwagon. Just look at that dumb story about Michael Jeffrey waterboarding Jimi to death with wine, it didn’t matter that Michael was in Spain at the time and couldn’t possibly have murdered Jimi. This basic truth didn’t matter one bit to these hoaxers so they came up with a more gruesome scenario to explain Jimi’s death.
So true, they suppress the real documented evidence and push their bogus claims instead trying to get followers who will help them promote the scam.
Good point about Michael Jeffery. When I pointed out to Brian Doyle aka Buster the clown that Michael Jeffery was in Spain in one of my very first comments, he changed his script to “it doesn’t matter if Jeffery was there, he arranged the whole thing” after he was saying for years that Jeffery himself “waterboarded Jimi with wine”.
All they do is spin, spin, spin and when one of their lies are exposed they make up something new and completely different to keep it going.
Hi Jason, I wonder if Buster has found a publisher for his book; I can’t wait to read it. LOL. He’ll probably use one of his many pseudonyms. 😜
Jetblast, Scrum Drum, Albert Doyle, or Ralph Yates? 🤣
Brian Doyle is just like Seifert who has Jimi with “some life still left in him” in their “second version”.
BUSTER says:
Jimi was murdered with wine at 5:30am
BUSTER says:
Jimi died at 5:30am
BUSTER says:
The reason Jimi wasn’t obviously dead was because he was put in to a partial coma paralysis by just the right borderline level of barbiturate combined with the drowning reflex from lungs full of wine…Enter that state on the correct glide path and you can ease in to a limbo between life and death…
More fun from serial internet hoaxer Buster the clown who changes his stories each time he attempts to argue nonsense for his “Jimi Hendrix Murder Hoax”. His “evidence” is made up all by himself which includes phony “private conversations” that never happened.
Brian Doyle aka Buster the Clown made up the fake “hard plug of vomit” claim so he can still lie about there being imaginary wine. First he said Bannister “removed it” then he changed his script telling us Bannister “never saw it” and Siefert removed it instead. This is what you call a lying fraud and an internet hoaxer. How many story changes can he have?
BUSTER AS JETBLAST says: January 30, 2014
Dr Bannister specified that he removed a plug of vomit from Hendrix’s windpipe and the wine then gushed out.
BUSTER says: Septeember 7, 2019
Dr Bannister told me personally that he removed a plug of vomit from Jimi’s throat and then wine gushed out from his lungs.
BUSTER says: Oct 26, 2019
Bannister never saw the hard plug of vomit in Jimi’s throat because Siefert and the nurses removed it before he got to the scene…
BUSTER says: October 29, 2019
Jason is lying when he says Bannister removed the vomit…I spoke to Bannister and he told me Siefert had gotten there first and removed the plug of vomit…By the time Bannister arrived the wine was visible in the throat and was no longer blocked…
BUSTER says: February 26, 2020
That is why when Dr Bannister removed the vomit in the throat there was all wine below it in the lungs and stomach (thank you)…
This is exactly why nobody should ever believe what Brian Doyle the infamous internet hoaxer says. He is a liar and makes up fake stories when it suits him. There was never a “hard plug of vomit” but he lies about that and even changes his phony Bannister stories that he made up himself. Doyle is mentally ill. Here’s another fine example of a serial hoaxer at work:
BUSTER says: Septeember 7, 2019
Dr Bannister told me personally that he removed a plug of vomit from Jimi’s throat and then wine gushed out from his lungs.
BUSTER says: October 29, 2019
Jason is lying when he says Bannister removed the vomit…I spoke to Bannister and he told me Siefert had gotten there first and removed the plug of vomit…By the time Bannister arrived the wine was visible in the throat and was no longer blocked…
Hi Jason, That’s how we know these statements are lies because the info keeps changing. This hoaxer doesn’t remember what he has said previously so he just tells lie after lie to keep the hoax alive.
August 26, 1970: Electric Lady Studios officially opens with a grand celebration with Jimi in attendance.
And a star studded guest list.
The 51st Anniversary of Jimi’s death is coming up on September 18th, so it’s no surprise that tin foil hatters are already starting to push their phony “murder” conspiracies to get attention.
Hi Jason, This happens year after year, a story of a murder that never took place.
Yep, a phony “murder”, “wine”, “procedures”, “cover ups”. All in the imagination of fraudsters and tin foil hatters.
I wonder if Bannister will put his hand up again for an in-depth interview about how he tried to save Jimi’s life. LOL.
LOL. We may hear from “the good doctor” again very soon.
Bannister did an interview a couple of years ago admitting Jimi was dead when he was brought in but then started talking about the massive amount of imaginary wine and how he “worked hard on Jimi to save his life”. He has no clue what he’s even saying.
Eric Burdon was the first to suggest that Jimi committed suicide after he interpreted the words of Jimi’s last poem/song as a suicide note. Sharon Lawrence took it one step further in her book by writing that Jimi took his own life to coincide with the number 9. Both equally untrue.
At least Eric Burdon admitted he was wrong to make assumptions of suicide but Sharon Lawrence made up outright lies and concocted a phony story of a Hendrix suicide to make money off gullible suckers who purchased her book. Burdon thought that at the time in 1970 but Sharon Lawrence waited 31 years to lie about Jimi.
Hi Jason, Eric was foolish enough to go on a program to make that assumption but he admitted he was under the influence, and the BBC never forgave him. As for Lawrence I can’t help thinking she exaggerated her friendship with Jimi so that people would fall for her story. That rubbish story about Monika supposedly admitting she poured wine over Jimi in an attempt to help him when he was chocking is just mindless nonsense.
Hi Ivana,
Eric Burdon wasn’t in good shape in 1970 and basically he started a conspiracy theory that gave people like Sharon Lawrence the ability to make up bogus stories using the suicide angle. Maybe Burdon wanted credit in a rush to judgement to reveal Jimi committed suicide even though that was totally false.
I agree with you about Lawrence. I never wasted any money on her fiction book but i was able to read a couple of chapters and it basically read like she was an acquaintance and not the confidant she claimed to be. She got everything wrong about where Jimi was born to his childhood and even up to his success, and was replaced with fictional stories she made up that would sound good to the reader.
Sharon clearly stated she believes Jimi committed suicide by taking 9 pills due to his fascination with the occult (which was a fictional story she made up) but then has Monika pouring wine all over Jimi and “moaning for several minutes” into the phone as a claimed admission of guilt. Totally off the wall stuff and true morons like Brian Doyle aka Buster believes that nonsense and uses that for his “murder” hoax.
What’s even worse is that she attempted to discredit Dr. Thurston with her fake “imbibed wine” claim when she already stated she believed Jimi committed suicide. Sharon expects us to believe that Dr. Thurston would withhold important evidence from Jimi’s case and not report it on his official death certificate and during the inquest. She also expects us to believe that Thurston would only divulge this information to one obscure reporter and that one obscure reporter would only tell Sharon Lawrence and nobody else on the planet. Then 31 years later that event suddenly “popped back” into her head so she could write it in her book. Just nothing but made up b.s. nonsense and these conspiracy theorists and hoaxers use that lie as the basis for their phony “murder” hoax.
I can’t wait for Buster’s book to be published. I’m sure the best bookstores will have it displayed in their shopfronts, and it will top the bestseller lists for years to come. 😂
I was hoping it would be released already so it could be #1 on the list. I wanted to read all about the “cover up” and the in-depth interviews that would be included in the jammed packed book of Hendrix knowledge. I wanted the “genius” to autograph my copy which would be an instant collectors item. You might need more than one copy Ivana since I’m sure you’ll be reading it so much the pages will wear thin. 🤣🤣🤣
Just when we thought it couldn’t get any worse I was reading some articles about Jimi’s spirituality and I came across someone who claims they are Jimi’s twin soul and is visited by his ghost. Would you believe Jimi told this person that he was murdered by Michael Jeffrey. There’s some weird stuff out there. Welcome to the Twilight Zone. 👻
Maybe Michael Jeffery was ghostlike as well so he could be in London and Spain at the same time lol. There’s always some kook out there looking to get noticed.
If Tappy “the fraud” Wright never came up his fake “murder” story it never would have been talked about.
Jimi Hendrix 27/11/1942-18/9/1970 RIP 💐
51 years ago Jimi Hendrix died massive overdose and left the world way too soon.
9/18/70
A couple of idiots on Facebook and Twitter today were pushing bogus murder conspiracies with the imaginary wine and phony procedures. After I told them to produce a hospital medical document that states there was “phony procedures” I got radio silence as expected. These tin foil hatters are all the same. They can push all the debunked lies but when you ask them to prove what they claim they shut up like a clam. These clowns ruined a perfectly good Jimi Hendrix tribute thread with their b.s.
The ghouls come out to play every 18th September. They can never produce concrete evidence because it doesn’t exist.
That’s why our “new friend” went into hiding since he has nothing to produce.
I wonder if Fraud Bannister is going to make his triumphant return to the spotlight on this day to make up phony stories of wine and how he “worked hard to save Jimi’s life”.
Jimi Hendrix’s ‘final words’ found in poem after his death
Sat, 18 September 2021
In the early hours of the final day of August 1970, Jimi Hendrix delivered what would become one of his most legendary performances.
A crowd estimated to number hundreds of thousands of people watched in awe as the American guitarist, singer and songwriter wowed them at the Isle of Wight Festival.
Hendrix was the biggest name – and the biggest influence – in popular music. It would be his last show in England.
Less than three weeks later, rock was in mourning.
Hendrix died 51 years ago today, on 18 September, 1970. His career spanned just four years, but in that time he changed music forever.
Anyone who picked up a guitar after hearing songs like Purple Haze, Hey Joe, The Wind Cries Mary, Voodoo Child (Slight Return), Crosstown Traffic and Foxy Lady owes something to Hendrix.
Those songs, and the guitar sound Hendrix created, have stood the test of time. His influence is etched in stone.
The circumstances surrounding his death are less clear, with many conflicting versions of how the musician’s life ended.
What is known is that an ambulance was called to a flat in the Samarkand Hotel in Notting Hill, London, at 11.18am on 18, September 1970.
When paramedics arrived at the scene, they found Hendrix lying on a bed, unresponsive. He was transported to St Mary Abbot’s Hospital, where he was pronounced dead on arrival.
A post-mortem examination and inquest found that Hendrix had choked on his own vomit and died of barbiturate-related asphyxia.
The flat was rented by Hendrix’s girlfriend, German painter Monika Dannemann, who had called the ambulance.
In the hours before his death, she had driven him to a friend’s home at about 1.45am that morning, then picked him up and took him back to the flat at 3am.
She later said that Hendrix had taken nine of her prescribed sleeping tablets, 18 times the recommended dosage, as they were to be taken in halves.
In the days after Hendrix’s death, it emerged that a poem he had written had been found in the flat. Dannemann claimed he had written it about her, and Eric Burdon, a singer with bands The Animals and War, described it as a “suicide note”, though he later retracted this, saying he had misread the words.
The final words of what Hendrix had written, whether poem or a song he was working on, reportedly read: “The story of life is quicker than the wink of an eye/The story of love is hello and goodbye, until we meet again.”
The poem, often referred to as The Story Of Life, reportedly begins: “The story of Jesus/So easy to explain/After they crucified him/A woman, she claimed his name.”
It was also reported that Hendrix had left a message before he died on his manager Chas Chandler’s answering machine, with the words: “I need help bad, man.”
In 1997, a blue plaque to Hendrix was erected at 23 Brook Street, Mayfair, London, where he lived between 1968 and 1969.
Music fans can visit the flat as part of the Handel & Hendrix museum – the German-British composer George Frideric Handel lived at number 25 from 1723 until his death in 1759.
Hendrix, born in Seattle, Washington, was 27 when he died. Just over two weeks later, US singer Janis Joplin died of a drug overdose at the same age.
A number of other famous musicians have died at the age of 27, including The Rolling Stones’ Brian Jones, The Doors’ Jim Morrison, Nirvana’s Kurt Cobain and singer Amy Winehouse.
The message that Jimi supposedly left for Chas Chandler has been disputed and has been proven to be false. Jimi would have been at Kameron’s party at the time and became uptight when Monika buzzed the intercom repeatedly.
Yes and authors still continue to print these myths hoping to get clicks and views even though it’s already been discredited. It’s not even the main part of the article but the headline entices readers to read the entire thing. Click and bait journalism.
One tin foil hatter sounds very much like infamous hoaxer Brian Doyle attempting to argue that Dr. Thurston and Dr. Teare only went by Monika Dannemann’s account that Jimi took an overdose of pills and they had no idea about “the wine that was removed 3 days earlier” by Fraud Bannister.
This fool is easily debunked because Jimi’s autopsy showed that he took a massive overdose of Vesparax consistent with what an overdose looks like. Jimi’s liver registered a 0.7 lethal level of barbiturates and that wouldn’t have been detected on just “Monika’s word”. Also, no abnormal amount of alcohol was detected anywhere on the inside or outside of Jimi’s body. Plus there was no “stomach full of wine” because Dr. Teare discovered a medium sized partially digested rice meal in Jimi’s stomach. If there was all this wine, and it was all removed from Jimi’s stomach, no rice would have been there. And finally, if Jimi was drowned to death in wine, the wine would have killed him and he wouldn’t have been vomiting from an overdose suffocating on vomit. There would be no vomit if he was being forced with wine since its a completely different action. Jimi also wouldn’t have had a lethal 0.7 if he was instantly drowned because the pills wouldn’t have had time to cause the overdose.
This clown Doyle, or another tin foil hatter who sounds like him, made a fool out of himself and several posters agreed with me that he’s an idiot posting a ridiculous conspiracy theory. This joker was reduced to swearing at me in all caps. A couple of people reported him for vulgar language and abuse. 🤣🤣🤣
Jimi died from an overdose of 💊
Not a made up conspiracy theory of 🍾🍷
9/18/70
When these tin foil hatters are cornered they become abusive it’s just one of their tactics to get people to believe them. When their claims are disputed they resort to name calling like we’ve seen here with Buster. It’s all part of an attempt to make themselves look credible but their dumb stories are easily debunked with the truth.
They resort to name calling as an attempt to diminish the person they are arguing against. Also, out of anger when they are easily debunked with documented evidence as their hoax goes up in smoke.
Haha Dr. “Wine” is still too tired to come out from working so hard.
Dr “Wine” must have read our comments and gone into hiding. LOL
Pop Star Jimi Hendrix Found Dead
London, Sept. 18, 1970- Jimi Hendrix, whom millions of fans considered the world’s finest pop star, died today of what police sources said was an apparent overdose of drugs.
The 27-year-old American musician was found dead inside the hotel room of blonde girlfriend Miss Monika Dannemann in the Notting Hill section. Mr. Hendrix was offically pronounced dead on arrival after being taken in an ambulance to St. Mary Abbots Hospital according to a hospital spokesman.
His body was taken from the hospital to a southwest London morgue for an autopsy. An inquest will be held.
That officially pronounced dead on arrival at the hospital is significant because it’s something only the doctors can do. The ambulance officers both said the same thing. Jimi wasn’t wheeled into casualty for life saving procedures because he died back at the Samarkand Hotel just like the article said. The doctors stated Jimi was beyond help, and Dr.Seifert did the bare minimum only so he could record time of death and complete the necessary paperwork.
When Jimi was wheeled into the hospital he was dead. Both ambulance men and a cop confirmed that Jimi was dead at the Samarkand which would make him dead on arrival at St. Mary Abbots Hospital.
One of the articles I’ve posted before from 1970 confirmed that Jimi was declared dead on arrival by doctors. The doctors were Bannister, Brown, and Siefert. During that same afternoon St. Mary Abbots Hospital conducted a media press conference where they confirmed Jimi was a DOA and the cause of death was an overdose of drugs.
Nobody said anything about “massive amounts of wine” or that “Jimi was still alive to have any life saving procedures”. The hospital would have stated that if that was the case. They never did which means that it never happened. Then 20, 30, 40 years later we get all these new versions and phony claims at an attempt to rewrite history. That’s what I keep telling these tin foil hatters and they will always be wrong.
Fraud Bannister admitted that Jimi was dead on admission and so did Siefert but then years later they make up tall tales of “wine” and how they “worked hard to save Jimi’s life”. That’s why they aren’t taken seriously but hoaxers use their new phony stories for their hoax because it fits their agenda.
I believe the articles that were written close to Jimi’s death. There wasn’t time to rewrite history and come up with the new claims about the wine killing Jimi instead of the toxic levels of barbiturates in his system. These hoaxers have had plenty of time to work on their phony stories over the years.
The articles written after Jimi’s death were accurate and there was no motive by fraudsters to distort the truth. All of these articles came directly from the credible sources that includes: the police, St. Mary Abbots Hospital, and the doctors.
Decades later people can think up whatever story they want and craft it to how they want to tell it. Hoaxers like Brian Doyle aka Buster changes his phony stories each time he’s debunked. Fraud Bannister and Dr. Siefert changed their stories over the years as well so their later claims are just b.s.
Here’s the article from 51 years ago that clearly states that Jimi Hendrix died from an overdose of drugs confirmed by the hospital. The article also clearly states that Jimi was pronounced dead on arrival according to “attending doctors”. The attending doctors were Bannister, Brown, and Siefert confirming Jimi was dead on arrival. That means there was no “phony procedures” and no imaginary wine. The doctors declared Jimi dead when he came into the hospital. All of these decades later new versions by Bannister and Siefert are a total joke and they can’t rewrite history when they already confirmed Jimi a DOA on 9/18/70
Drug Overdose Kills Rock Idol Hendrix
September 19, 1970
London (Reuters) – American rock star Jimi Hendrix died yesterday of an overdose of drugs, a spokesman for St. Mary’s Abbots Hospital announced.
Mr. Hendrix was transported by ambulance where he was pronounced dead on arrival according to attending doctors.
“He was a good friend of mine and I will miss him,” singer Janis Joplin said when she told of guitarist Jimi Hendrix’s death in London Friday. And she cried.
Rock musicians across the country mourned the loss of a rare talent and brilliant guitarist.
“He was a innovator,” said Miss Joplin from a California recording studio. “He made everybody in the music business aware that the public was ready for and really wanted free musical expression. He showed that it really wasn’t delusion. It was reality.”
British musician John Mayall called Hendrix’ contribution “monumental”.
“The cat was definitely the main man,” said drummer Buddy Miles, formerly with Hendrix’ Band of Gypsies and now leader of The Buddy Miles Band.
Hendrix, 27, was found dead of an apparent drug overdose in a London apartment rented by 23-year-old Monika Dannemann, a beautiful German blonde.
Hendrix reportedly took several pills while suffocating on his own vomit according to hospital sources. A coroner’s officer took several blankets and some pills for analysis.
Police sources say the cause of death appears to be drug related. A post mortem examination was scheduled today, followed by a coroner’s inquest, probably Monday.
Eric Burdon, former lead singer with a group called The Animals and friend of Hendrix said: “All I know is that he had taken some sleeping pills.”
Burdon added that Miss Dannemann had found Hendrix in a coma and called an ambulance. She was taken to the hospital and put under sedation.
Hendrix made his last public appearance at a London jazz club Wednesday night. “We had been trying to contact him for three days but could not,” said one of the singer’s British agents. “It was very unlike him. He was usually very reliable.”
Hendrix, who featured wild music, swiveling hips and an unruly Afro hairstyle, once said he used drugs but outgrown them.
A year ago he told an interviewer, ” I tell you when I die I’m not going to have a funeral. I’m going to have a jam session. And, knowing me, I’ll probably get busted at my own funeral.”
Hi Jason, Makes perfect sense. That rubbish about Jimi being superhuman able to withstand a high dosage of a barbiturate is tin foil hatter spin. Of course he died back at the Samarkand; the doctors would have taken one look at him and realised they were dealing with a corpse. It was just a formality on their part to confirm the obvious.
Especially with Vesparax since 1 pill is designed to put a 160 pound man asleep for 8 hours regardless of what “drug tolerance” he had. Of course it’s tin foil hatter spin, they need to deny and dismiss Jimi’s drug overdose so they can replace it with their imaginary wine for the hoax.
Dr. “Wine” kept quiet this year. Hooray!🥳
Maybe he couldn’t think up any new stories this year. 😃
I can only imagine the impact Jimi’s death had on Devon Wilson. She would have lost her bread and butter and a roof over her head since she was living with Jimi in his New York apartment. She was told by Jimi’s management that she could keep items from the apartment. Her drug addiction become worse and she later died at a seedy hotel by falling out of a window or, as some have suggested, by being pushed.
Devon was a troubled woman who was heavily into hard drugs. After Jimi’s death she was on her own and had to come up with her own money for drugs. Conspiracy theorists like Brian Doyle push the false tale that Devon was “murdered” by Michael Jeffery because she “knew too much” and would spill the beans. It’s totally ridiculous because Devon died 4 months after Jimi so by that time she would have told everybody everything she knew. The fact is there was nothing “she knew” because there was nothing for her to know. Just more lies being told by these hoaxers. Devon either died from the fall accidentally being under the influence of drugs or as a suicide. Some theories have her being pushed out the window, as some people suggested, by a drug dealer for her refusal to pay but there isn’t a whole lot of credibility to that.
Hi Jason, I would never fall for anything Brian Doyle said. Betty Davis wife of Miles Davis wrote a song about Devon called “I Miller Shoes”. My interpretation is that Devon could have achieved much more with her life but chose to do nothing. Betty even goes as far as calling Devon nothing wasting her life on pursuing drugs and rock stars. Another biographer said that she clung onto her super groupie status because it was the only status she had. I get the feeling that if Devon hadn’t died she would have ended up on the streets as an exploited homeless drug addicted woman.
Devon most likely would have died from an OD if she hadn’t have fell out of the window. A person can only abuse drugs so much until they take a fatal dose and I’m certain her death was drug related even though the death was accidental. Doyle is an idiot and he doesn’t even believe in the nonsense he writes himself.
I’ve been looking at some really funny tin foil hatter emojis and reading about what types of people are drawn to conspiracy theories. Makes for interesting reading.
People who are gullible and can’t think for themselves become consumed by conspiracy theories. Even when these conspiracies are debunked, these people can’t bring themselves to admit they were duped, so they dig in even further to keep believing in these fairy tales. Imaginary wine comes to mind lol.
So true. It’s as if they belong to a secret society and only they know the real truth. Just plain weird and kooky.
I’ve just read something really sad and disturbing about an incident that happened to Jimi when he was a child; he confided to a girlfriend that he had been sexually abused by a man in uniform. 😢
Twitter troll “Hendrix Fan” is pushing a ridiculous Hendrix “murder” conspiracy.
It goes like this:
Monika was recruited by Michael Jeffery to be a “honey trap” to seduce Jimi and lure him to the Samarkand so they could murder him. She gave Jimi the pills to put him under “sedation” so he would be unconscious in order to murder him with “wine”. So, around 10:30am Monika left to get cigarettes while Jeffery and his men came inside to drown Jimi with “bottles of wine”. Monika returned to call for an ambulance to make it look accidental and left the scene. According to the troll, Jimi was “soaked in wine” observed by Fraud Bannister and wine up to his throat. Jeffery then began to threaten everybody including the ambulance men, doctors, friends that they would meet the same fate if they ever divulged the truth, so that’s why all the stories were different.
Isn’t this whole thing totally laughable? And sadly, a few people were starting to believe it. It sounds to me this is the handiwork of our “old friend” with a new phony made up plot.
Hi Jason, So silly. I can’t believe people would fall for a story like that. Hendrix Fan might use various pseudonyms to disguise who he really is to try to dupe people but his style says it all. Can you imagine anyone being threatened by the likes of Michael Jeffrey. All those people would have just laughed in his face and walked away. Surely they would have turned the tables on Jeffrey and reported him to the authorities. This stuff is all coming from Hendrix Fan vivid imagination like always. 😜
Hi Ivana,
Casual fans of Jimi and others that don’t know the event surrounding his death are easily persuaded by these kinds of trolls who use these uninformed people to amplify their hoax to the masses. Hoaxing trolls put out these phony conspiracies hoping others will follow along. When you debunk their lies and people understand it’s a scam they realize how ridiculous the whole thing is. That’s why I try to inform as many people as possible so this garbage can be quickly debunked.
Michael Jeffery was just a night club owner and became a greedy rock manager. He used to tell tall tales to make himself look important for status so he could attract women. One record producer began making the false claim that Jeffery was in British Intelligence when no record of him ever being enlisted ever existed. The highest rank Jeffery ever made it to was ‘private’ and that is officially on record. From there, hoaxers like “our friend” made up fake stories of Jeffery being a “super secret agent” involved in a “cover up” and threatening everybody associated with Jimi. Jeffery died in 1973, but supposedly, his “underlings” took over to this very day to keep the threats going with those who are still alive. The whole thing is stupid and Jeffery would have been turned in if he tried to threaten Thurston or Teare who both had direct connections to the police and Royal Family.
Secret Agents Michael Purple Haze Jeffrey and Monika If 6 was 9 Dannemann. LOL. I’m sure Michael was a good manager of The Experience but the real stars were Jimi, Mitch and Noel. Drs. Thurston and Teare had more clout and status than Jeffrey in the scheme of things. All conspiracy theories need an audience to survive and thrive otherwise they end up in bargain basement bin like Tappy Wright’s book.
The two best secret agents of the year 1970. LOL.
And the award goes to…presented by none other than 007 Bond James Bond shaken not stirred. 😀
Hi Ivana,
Did you know that Jeffery and the “murderers” now used 6 bottles of wine?
It now increased by one bottle. Every few years the number of bottles goes up. 🤣
So funny. These hoaxers are digging their own grave; that’s how we can tell these are all lies because the “facts” keep changing. I hope the murderers used cheap wine at least. 😂
Hopefully since the other bottles were “spilled all over the bed”. I think Monika wasted a bottle too. 🤣 🤣
Guess the hoaxer felt 6 bottles sounds more sinister than 5. Six years ago it was only 3 bottles lol.
This will soon turn into 10 green bottles sitting on the wall. We can all have a good sing-a-long. LOL.
Noel and Mitch both died at a relatively young age. Noel at age 57 from a health issue and Mitch died in his sleep aged 62.
So, I was reading more of the b.s. coming from the main hoaxer and this phony Hendrix Murder Caper is totally different than from what was being spun before. A more fake sinister plot with more help from Monika as an “accomplice” along with rogue agents to “take out Jimi”. The funny thing is this idiot is confused as whether he wants it to be a disgruntled manager trying to keep his fortune or to turn into a shocking secret Intel plot.🤣
People have already called this clown out and now he’s blocking people that disagree with him. Wonder when the “new book” will be released. 🤣🤣🤣
Same old dumb tactics. Of all the times Jimi could have been murdered, in concert for example, Monika and Michael Jeffrey wait until 1970 to do the deed in an obscure hotel room with bottles of wine. You would need to be pretty gullible to fall for a plot like that. Can’t wait for the revised edition of the book with the rogue agents. I understand Hollywood is waiting for the book to come out so they can turn into a movie; they are already auditioning actors to play the part of Michael, Monika and the rogue agents. I heard Tom Cruise is interested. 😜😜😜
We know Monika exaggerated her relationship with Jimi because even though she arrived in London in August of 1970 in reality she spent very little time with Jimi during that time amounting to only a few days. Most of the time they were in the company of other people socialising. Jimi never moved in with her at the Samarkand Hotel as he was staying as the Cumberland Hotel. Jimi’s death certificate has his address as the Cumberland Hotel where he was registered and not the Samarkand Hotel. Despite what Monika wanted us to believe if she and Jimi were actually engaged then Jimi would not have been seeing Kirsten Nefer.
The whole conspiracy theory is ridiculous.
Jimi was supposed to go on tour again and his new album wasn’t completed yet. These hoaxers say Jeffery only wanted money out of Jimi. So, Jeffery is going to “murder Jimi with wine” so he can lose out on the tour money and a better finished product? 🤣
Jimi was the cash cow and a lot of people depended on him for their livelihoods so no-one would be dumb enough to try a murder him. For example, Noel and Mitch never reached the level of success they had with The Experience after Jimi died.
Monika was able to exaggerate her relationship with Jimi because he died and wasn’t able to refute her lies. Jimi’s friends should have called out Monika’s lies right then and there.
Jimi was indeed a cash cow and the entire murder conspiracy is a joke.
Speaking of jokes, our hoaxing friend made up a new asinine claim on the spot when he couldn’t answer how Jimi had “phony procedures” when he was long dead.
Michael Jeffery knew the exact amount of wine to drown Jimi with so Jimi “only appeared dead”. So, according to this fraud Jimi wasnt “really dead” but the ambulance men thought he was. Fraud Bannister recognized Jimi was “still alive” and immediately went to work. So, pouring 6 bottles of wine down Jimi’s throat wouldn’t kill him….it would only make him unconscious with the “perfect” amount of pills. He says Jeffery was in intelligence and knew the proper amount of wine and pills to put Jimi under into a “subconscious death” but was really alive. 🤣🤣🤣
This conspiracy theory has gone off the rails. Lol.
It couldn’t get anymore ridiculous. This tin foil hatter fool is just covering his tracks; when he’s caught out he invents even more over the top claims. This is all part of his moronic tactics.
I often wonder how long Jimi would have lived if he hadn’t died of an overdose in 1970. Mick Jagger and Paul McCartney are both in their senior years, and I think their survival may have been because they married and had families so they had some stability. Jimi on the other hand didn’t really form any monogamous relationships with women preferring to remain single.
For our hoaxing “friends” 🤣🤣🤣
[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FCgJUU-X0AICsxK?format=jpg&name=900×900[/img]
Hi Ivana,
That would have been interesting to find out. Some of Jimi’s closest friends said that if he hadn’t of died on September 18th, he would have overdosed sooner rather than later due to the amount of drugs he was consuming during that period. Even though they made that claim, it was the Vesparax that did Jimi in and he never would have taken the equivalent of that amount with normal barbiturates.
Mick and Paul’s marriages probably had something to do with it, but Mick and Paul didn’t heavily indulge into drugs as some of their bandmates and fellow musicians partook in. Mick and Paul took their fair share of drugs but knew what their limit was and it seems it was more recreational rather than terrible everyday addiction.
Keith Richards was heavily into heroin for a decade and John Lennon took more drugs than any other Beatle but only died because he was murdered. So, it’s fair to say Lennon would have at least lived as long as George Harrison or still could have been alive today.
I think also it has to do with a person’s own body and what you would call the “survival of the fittest”. Keith Richards was a heavy smoker for decades along with drinking tons of alcohol plus all his drug consumption of heroin and cocaine. On the other hand, Davy Jones from The Monkees was a health nut who exercised regularly and ate healthy. He didn’t smoke, drink, or take drugs and he died from a massive heart attack at age 66 while Keith Richards is still kicking and pushing 80. So, I guess that has a lot to do with it. And even Keith said he knew what his intake limit was so he wouldn’t OD. He said people OD because they think they can do even more than what they can handle.
When you look at all the overdoses of famous people, it’s usually the ones who took way too much that died rather than dying from the effects of their normal amount.
Hi Jason, Interesting information here. Drugs are bad news but unfortunately they are an integral part of the music business. I think it helped some of these musicians to know their limits like Keith Richards said. I’’m amazed some of these people are still alive given their bad habits.
As if it couldn’t get any worse, I’ve just read that Jimi is alive and living in Malaysia. There goes another conspiracy. 😝
Jimi always expressed gratitude to the women who helped him out when he was a struggling musician in New York. Linda Keith spoke to Chas Chandler after seeing Jimi perform in a night club in Greenwich Village.
Hi Ivana,
Even though some musicians “knew their limits” with drugs, quite a few of them died as they became older due to the damage that drugs did to their bodies. People like Chris Wood and Paul Kossoff didn’t even make it to 35 years old because of drugs. So I guess some bodies can tolerate more drugs than others. Like some heavy cigarette smokers develop cancer at a younger age while others develop it older or some don’t at all. Kossoff died at 25 while in an airplane heading to New York. It would be interesting to compare the drug intake between Kossoff and Keith Richards just to see if they were on par with the same amount. And if it was more than Keith, that would be the reason for a very early death. I forget who it was that said it, but one musician said he did drugs for recreation while at parties or to ocassionaly relax and the media grossly exaggerated his use of drugs and as well as the band’s. He said it was a tale instead of reality, but maybe he was the one not telling us the truth. 😀
Hi Jason, I’ve seen the long list of musicians who died from various addictions, and it’s a sad one.
I wonder if Jimi is living in a “Red House” over yonder in Malaysia.🤔
With Janis Joplin, Jim Morrison, Mama Cass and Elvis Presley.
did the killers wait for jimi to od then kill him with wine? this theory is stupid.
Hi April, Conspiracy theories don’t rely on logic. The wine “myth” was added years later but was absent from the original story. Monika was the first to mention wine and then Dr. Bannister kept repeating it. Tappy Wright invented the dumb murder plot in his book, and conspiracy theorists have used it as their “bible” ever since.
So, the self proclaimed “world’s foremost expert on Jimi Hendrix” was called a ‘fabulist’ by a Rock historian after he read his phony Jimi Hendrix conspiracy theory. 🤣🤣🤣
This 🤡 was whining about being banned from various Jimi Hendrix sites and forums and now he’s blocking people on Twitter who disagrees with him or says he is full of 💩
Total hypocrite.
Hi Jason, This clown should ask himself why he repeatedly gets banned from all these sites. I wonder if it has anything to do with the rubbish he keeps spewing out. 😝
And his abusive behavior. If you don’t agree with his nonsense he will start attacking you and will try to silence you by demanding you get banned or to have the thread get deleted.
Some journalist wrote a piece on Jimi’s death and took old interviews from people that knew him from a while ago but you have to sign up for the blog and pay a fee to read the articles so I won’t be reading it lol. But it would be interesting what it had to say.
He uses the same tactics on everyone. I really don’t think anyone takes this clown seriously. There’s no need to be abusive because what he has to say makes no sense at all.
The clown reminds me of a child who has a tantrum when he doesn’t get his own way. If I had his address I’d send him a dummy and diapers. 😆
You should also include a roll of aluminum foil so he can make a tin foil hat and some clown hair so he can fit the part. LOL.
Yes he does and almost everyone that engages with him laughs at him. He becomes abusive when he’s not taken seriously. He has built up in his own crazy mind that he’s this intellectual superior and you have to agree with all of the idiotic claims he comes up with or else you’re a troll and deserve to be banned but he is the one who is always banned.
At the beginning this clown had lots of support but slowly everyone deserted him. He invented Flyswatter to make it look as if someone believed what he was saying. He needs to be prescribed Vesparax if he isn’t taking it already. LOL.
As his stories became more ridiculous I can see why people jumped ship. Flyswatter was his fake account so he could make it appear someone supported him on here and on other sites. He did that on Amazon as well, with his many fake accounts agreeing with himself to make it appear he had a following. He even admitted to doing it when someone called him out. He said something like “credible journalists do it to enhance their writings”. He definitely needs a bottle of Vesparax for his delusions of grandeur, but he may end up taking more than prescribed because he told us the average person could take 10 with no problem according to a study that he claimed existed but that “study” never did. Just more invented claims made up in his crazy mind. I wonder if he was on LSD or other serious hard drugs back in the day?
Jimi Hendrix 27/11/1942. Jimi would have been 79 years of age if he hadn’t died on 18/9/1970.
79 years old. All those years flew by and his career lasted quicker than a blink of an eye. His first album was in 1967 and it was over in 1970. The anniversary of Axis: Bold as Love was on December 1.
Hi Jason, Described as Jimi’s most poetic album. Love the title track.
The title track never gets old and the album is fantastic all around.
So this clown sees himself as a credible journalist, more likely the ones who write fake stories/news. Australia wants to pass laws making it more difficult to use false names to troll others online or at least to make the tech companies more accountable for what’s published on line.
That should be implemented here. Too many people can use an alias to troll, harass, and slander people with a fake name and it does great harm to an individual. Meanwhile, the troll is anonymous and gets away with it.
Some people have taken their own lives because of hurtful online comments. 😔
Hi Ivana,
There’s a lot of bullies, stalkers, and trolls on social media that have caused people to take their own life. One troll on Twitter admitted to having 250 Twitter accounts and 100 Facebook accounts to troll people with.
A while ago I watched a documentary about Woodstock the organisation it took to make this event happen was mind boggling. The organisers were preparing for a few thousand to show up but never expected the massive crowd of 500,000. At one point they ran out of food and the locals started donating what was in their pantries. Jimi was supposed to perform on Sunday but didn’t take the stage until early Monday morning when most of the vast crowd had left, performing The Star Spangled Banner to about 30,000 people. I think I prefer Crosby, Stills and Nash version of ‘Woodstock’ rather than Joni Mitchell.
Hi Ivana,
That was a massive crowd indeed at Woodstock and luckily it was a peaceful event unlike the disaster at Altamont a couple of months later with The Rolling Stones and Hells Angels. The anniversary of that debacle was a two days ago on Dec. 6th. That was only a few hours event and not 3 days worth. Conspiracy theorists tried to claim Michael Jeffery sabotaged Jimi by moving his performance to early Monday but that wasn’t the case at all. I bet more people wished they had seen Jimi perform, that is if they would be able to remember it. 😉
Hi Jason, I never heard the story about Michael Jeffrey sabotaging Jimi’s performance. Jimi was the highest paid performer earning $18,000 so no-one would be dumb enough to jeopardise his performance. This is just another example of conspiracy theorists not thinking things through before opening their mouths to make their stupid comments.
Hi Ivana,
Yeah, that phony conspiracy theory has been around for well over a decade. Just another attempt by these tin foil hatters to paint Jeffery as the “evil manager” who was always “out to get Jimi”. They wanted to create a scenario that Jeffery had to control Jimi to create dependency so Jimi had to keep him around. Another bogus claim to this tale was that Jeffery sabotaged Jimi’s performance and pushed it to the end of the festival to “teach Jimi a lesson” in order to show Jiimi that he could “destroy him” if he ever crossed him. Just total made up nonsense because Jeffery would never do anything to lose out on monetary earnings by ruining Hendrix. This is similar to the phony drug bust claim where our “clown friend” said Jeffery planted the drugs for the same reasons. Who in their right mind would risk potentially sending their cash cow to prison for a decade and losing out on all their future profits “just to teach them a lesson”? Toronto Canada had extremely harsh drugs laws back in 1969. Just more b.s. from the 🤡 factory.
I wanted to mention a musician who was actually murdered. John Lennon was shot to death on December 8, 1980. He was the first Beatle to die at only 40 years of age. A horrible loss because at some point the Beatles would have gotten back together for some shows and maybe a new album or two. Not only that, Lennon had so much more music to give us that we were never able to hear. We were truly robbed.
A tragic loss. His murderer couldn’t understand why John sang about no possessions in ‘Image’ and then lived a luxurious lifestyle. The Beatles not only lost a colleague but a friend- he would have been considered more of a family member. 😪
Michael Nesmith. RIP 💐
Michael Jeffrey arranged for Jimi to be put on a tour with The Monkees in 1967 after The Experience performed at The Monterey Pop Festival. The Monkees appealed to a very young audience so Jimi didn’t last long on this tour.
Sad news today as Michael Nesmith of The Monkees passed away. Nesmith was good friends with Jimi. That makes Mickey Dolenz the only surviving member of the group.
Some guy named “Mark Hess” put out a “story” that Jimi was “poisoned” at Kameron’s party and a couple of the guests drove Jimi back to the Samarkand and let him die there which was why nobody was around when the ambulance men arrived. 🤣
What a joke! Mark Hess forgot to mention that Monika came to pick Jimi up, and he was very much alive. Monika said something similar but was never taken seriously, it was just an effort on her part to shift blame.
Laugh at the way these tin foil hatters manipulate the facts so that everything they say turns into a fantasy. The only “threat “ at Kameron’s party was Monika and her repeated attempts to contact Jimi via the intercom. The other people at the party were Jimi’s longtime friends, and I think he would have felt comfortable being with them.
Hi Ivana,
It was Monika who originally created these fictional accounts to distance herself from Jimi’s death and accuse fictional people of killing Jimi. Mark Hess is using her lies for his future profit.
Monika came up with the fake story that Jimi didn’t want her at Kameron’s party because of “bad people” being there. That was a lie. The party guests were Jimi’s friends and associates. Jimi just didn’t want her there, so she needed a cover story to keep up the fantasy of them “both being madly in love about to get married”.
Monika a couple of years later came up with fake story that Jimi was “poisoned by the Mafia”. Again, to distance herself from Jimi’s death.
There was also another story that circulated years ago that Jimi took the wrong pill at Kameron’s party and he collapsed there. Supposedly, Jimi and his friend couldn’t hear over the loud music and when Jimi asked for a pill the friend gave Jimi the wrong pill instead which made him collapse.
So Mark Hess took pieces of these fake stories and concocted his own fake story where “Jimi was poisoned by bad guys at Kameron’s party, driven to the Samarkand, and then left for dead”.
Hess also is trying to promote a sinister plot of a murder by Jeffery and his people killing Jimi at the party.
The 🤡 is trying to get Hess to buy into the fake wine claim by telling him that the “murders” came back to “finish the job” since nobody was around. But that also debunks his previous conspiracy of Monika being around to oversee and take part in the imaginary “wine drowning” with Jeffery.
Hess is funding for a future fake documentary that “lays out the truth” according to him. Just another joker trying to make money off Jimi’s death and it looks like the 🤡 thinks he can profit too. These tin foil batter are something else.
Hi Jason, The friends at Kameron’s party were very protective of Jimi. They repeatedly told Monika to go away when she wouldn’t leave him alone. These friends would have also seen the true extent of Jimi’s relationship with Monika, and they would have realised that it wasn’t as rosy as Monika claimed. Jimi tried to get Devon Wilson to go with him when he left Kameron’s party I think because he didn’t intend to stay at Monika’s hotel. These tin foil hatters are just trying to come up with a plot that hasn’t been told before so that they have an edge over the other tin foil hatters. These are all stupid lies; they are waiting for someone to buy into this rubbish.
Hi Ivana,
Monika caused a scene when she was trying to get in to the party and the guests weren’t too fond of her. I’m sure Jimi told them he didn’t want her around the party. And if Jimi did plan on getting married, he would have told all his friends. All those fantasy stories came only from Monika.
Hess went on to say, that Jeffery had “his people” at the party to “do Jimi in” so it would look like a “mix up of pills” when he was actually “poisoned”. He claims the loud music was up on purpose so nobody could hear them “threatening Jimi” before the “poison pill” was given.
The 🤡 said it was probably poison Jeffery used in MI6 for his “spy work”. The 🤡 said Tappy “The Fraud” Wright always knew more to the story but never told it in his book out of fear. He only told about the “murder” at the Samarkand. He’s now claiming he is “vindicated” and proved his “haters” wrong. 🤣🤣🤣
These tin foil hatters are ridiculous. They just made up some fake new story out of the blue claiming it really happened and forgetting all the old nonsense they used to make up.
This story is so far removed from what really happened to Jimi that his death has been turned into fiction. It takes a really warped mind to come up with this garbage. Strange how Dr. Teare found no traces of any poison in Jimi’s system during the autopsy just the Vesparax because there wasn’t any. 🤥
Hi Ivana,
That’s exactly right, Dr. Teare found no “poison” in Jimi’s system but documented that the Vesparax poisoned his liver due to the extreme overdose he took. So, these fraudsters use the word “poison” to lie about people poisoning Jimi. Even though we know there wasn’t any poison, conspiracy theorists like the 🤡 says that Teare was in on a “cover up” in order to make their lie sound legitimate.
Mark Hess is continuing to perpetuate this ridiculous Hendrix conspiracy. He’s now trying to claim that the “murder site” was intended to be at Harvey’s which would be in a secluded location for a “murder cover up”. Hess says that Monika ruined the entire “murder plot” by getting into an argument with Jimi over the girls that were present. Hess went on to say that the next viable “murder location” would be at Kameron’s party. He said nobody would question Jeffery’s associates being there since they were part of management. He claims Monika was the decoy to distract the guests when she called up to request Jimi to leave the party and that’s when Jeffery’s people “poisoned Jimi”.
Hess is now backtracking on his lie that Jimi became ill at the party. He’s now saying the poison didn’t begin to work until after Jimi left the party with Jeffery’s people. Somebody questioned him over the fact that nobody in Jimi’s circle stated Jimi was sick at the party, but he pointed to the circulated claim that Jimi collapsed there as evidence. His new bogus claim is the guests were fearful of the same thing happening to them, so that’s why they never “divulged the truth” of “what really happened” to Jimi. Just more b.s. from a hoaxer.
Hess was also trying to implicate Harvey as a suspect in a “murder ring”. He was saying “why would some stranger in a passing car just happen to invite one of the biggest rock stars in the world over to his place for an evening”? He states it was all a set up and he was directed by Jeffery with strict orders to “soften up Hendrix for impending doom”. The 🤡 said it’s plausible. He said Harvey’s father was in government and the “corrupt British government killed Hendrix and is still covering it up”. The 🤡 said Jimi was a victim of a “honey trap” and Monika was a sophisticated MI6 agent trained by Jeffery. The 🤡 also said it was the mafia, FBI, black panthers, CIA, London thugs that “murdered Jimi. 🤣🤣🤣
So this is the garbage Hess is promoting and says he won’t “reveal the most damning information until the documentary comes out”. He’s currently funding for this bogus project. I hope this idiot doesn’t make a dime off this crap.
Hi Jason, This is just too ridiculous. There was nothing particularly sophisticated about Monika. I think she fell to readily for Jimi’s ‘romantic’ gestures without realising that he probably used the same tactics on all the girls he met. She caused a scene at both the parties Jimi attended because she thought she was Jimi’s fiancée but should have realised that she was nothing more than a casual affair by the fact that Jimi showed interest in the other girls. Maybe Jimi was tiring of her already and wanted her gone. Why would any government agency show interest in Jimi I can’t think of any situation were Jimi was being deliberately threatening to the authorities. Funny how this ‘information’ all comes to light decades after the event and was never revealed earlier on. It’s just garbage and belongs in the bargain basement bin. 🗑
I remember reading that President Nixon had invited Jimi to the White House because he wanted the youth of the day to vote for him. How much of a threat would you be if the President of the day wanted to be seen with you?
Monika was a former ice skater turned groupie and painter. The idea of her being a top notch “spy” at 23 years of age is an absolute joke. Monika was infatuated with Jimi, and actually obsessed is the better word, since she painted pictures of him up until her death. We know she made up fictional accounts and I’ve always said she just wanted to be associated with his legacy forever. Jimi’s friends like Eric Burdon and Ginger Baker called her crazy and both said she was a stalker. And her behavior that night proved it.
Conspiracy theorists always need a sinister “government plot” for their conspiracy. And this hoax makes no sense since the initial claim by “Tappy the fraud” was that Jeffery killed Jimi because he was going to leave him. The 🤡 clown for years made up a phony government conspiracy but he’s always confused at to which government he wants Jimi to be killed by either UK or US. Then he said mafia, black panthers, etc. It’s whatever he wants it to be. Now there’s this idiot Hess expanding on even more ridiculous made up stories.
These people are just making a mockery of Jimi’s death and just wanting to cash in on his name. They are no fans and are just putting out shameful lies.
Keith Richards of The Rolling Stones is 78 years old today. 🎉
He made it to 78!
Monika wasn’t the only girl Jimi proposed marriage to. Jimi asked Kirsten Nefer the same thing only she didn’t take it seriously realising it was intended as a pickup line.
Watched a documentary about the late great Whitney Houston last night. Her drug addiction took an enormous physical toll and she died in a bathtub in a hotel room at age 48. At one point she was the highest paid female performer but was forced to tour again because she was penniless with some fans even walking out of her performances because of her bad singing. The coroner ruled accidental drowning her cocaine addiction causing heart damage.
I forget which 70’s pop star said it but he refrained from taking drugs and said he was ostracized by most people in the music business for “not fitting in” but he said “I’m still alive today and healthy” while others have been gone for years.
That was a shame about Whitney Houston. Super talented and seemed happy with life but then hooked up with Bobby Brown and she destroyed her life and died at an early age. If you look at her pictures through the years, after she was with Brown, you can see the toll all the drugs took on her body. She looked really unhappy and sickly. She aged a lot during that time. Cocaine also destroys a person’s voice so I’m sure that made the difference in the poor performances. I believe her daughter died in a similar way in a bathtub addicted to drugs.
Hi Jason, An insightful comment made by Eric Burdon about Jimi looking dirty and having a slight odour when he showed up to jam at Ronnie Scott’s Club. He was obviously neglecting himself for whatever reason. Monika seemed more interested in showing off the snake ring that was supposed to be an engagement ring than taking care of her soon to be ‘husband’. Devon took offence and reportedly kicked Monika off a chair not believing a word of it. Jeanette Jacobs also came to view it as a lie later on.
Hi Ivana,
People have said that Jimi was taking a lot of drugs during his last few days so it seems he wasn’t taking care of himself. Although, Monika did say Jimi took a bath the evening before he died when he wrote them poem but that was most likely earlier in the day. Monika loved the attention and the status of being seen with a famous rock star so she probably didn’t care.
Hess is now saying that Harvey should be considered to be a possible suspect. He also made the absurd claim that “Jeffery’s goons” held Jimi’s head out the window on the drive back to the Samarkand so he wouldn’t pass out in the car. He says they needed him to be awake to administer “the pills and wine” 🤣
Same old nonsense from the 🤡 with a newly added bottle of wine 🤣:
“Hendrix was coerced into non-stop touring by Jeffery.
Jeffery was behind a bizarre 1969 kidnapping in which the guitarist was abducted, held for days and threatened with death.
This was supposedly a charade designed to intimidate Hendrix, who told friends on many occasions he feared for his life.
The British Government had all the proof it needed for murder in its possession back in fall 1970.
Jimi was soaked in wine and had “6 bottles worth” evacuated from his lungs and stomach by Dr Bannister in the St Mary Abott’s Hospital Resuscitation Room.
The autopsy recorded only a 5mg per 100ml blood alcohol content which was incommensurate with the wine witnessed in and around Jimi.”
More fantasy/fiction coming from this fool. All Hess has done is taken the facts and twisted them into a fairytale. There is nothing in this story that has any truth to it at all. ☹️
If anything Harvey was concerned about Jimi’s well being and safety while Monika was verbally abusing Jimi over her jealousy of the other girls Jimi showed interest in. Similarly the friends at Kameron’s party tried to protect Jimi from Monika’s repeated attempts to contact him and interrupt his time at the party. Jimi would have become very wary of Monika after her outbursts and I think that’s why he wanted Devon to go with him. Devon seemed to understand Monika’s motives and wasn’t hesitant to stand up to her.
Hi Ivana,
These tin foil hatters pretend like they were there as they narrate a fictional story that they make up.
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 🎅🏻🥳
My posts aren’t showing up.
Merry Christmas Ivana! I posted a picture of Jimi dressed as Santa but it’s not showing up.
Hi Jason, I’ve seen the picture you mean and it’s a really nice one.
Trying it again.
December 27, 1969 Despite initial reports that Fat Mattress had not disbanded, new information surfaced about the group’s messy split.
Despite initial reports that Fat Mattress had not disbanded, new information surfaced about the group’s messy split. Guitarist Noel Redding left for home after suffering what was being called a “nervous breakdown.” A spokesman for the Robert Stigwood Organization said, “the American tour could have been worth a million dollars.” Meanwhile, Jimmy Leverton of Fat Mattress told Melody Maker “the whole thing got out of hand. It was down to a personal thing within the band. We just couldn’t go on.”
Poor Noel found things difficult after The Experience. He tried to make a go of things but it just didn’t work out. Jimi had a nickname for Fat Mattress-Thin Pillow.
I’m surprised Jimi’s management didn’t think about taking some of his clothes to the funeral directors who prepared Jimi’s body for the flight back to Seattle. I read Jimi was dressed in a jacket that didn’t belong to him. It would have been a matter of just going back to the Cumberland Hotel to retrieve his clothing.
Yeah they should have done that but I guess they didn’t care to.
Happy New Year! Last day of 2021.
December 31, 1969: Prior to their two concerts later that evening, Hendrix and his Band Of Gypsys held an afternoon sound check and rehearsal at the Fillmore East.
Fillmore East, New York Two Shows Prior to their two concerts later that evening, Hendrix and his Band Of Gypsys held an afternoon sound check and rehearsal at the Fillmore East. Later that evening, before a sold out crowd of 2,639, Hendrix rang in the New Year and new decade with two unforgettable performances.
The evening’s festivities opened with a spirited set by the Voices Of East Harlem, an enthusiastic young gospel ensemble. With the anticipation of the sold out Fillmore audience heightened to fever pitch, Hendrix led his trio through a scintillating, seventy-five minute opening performance. None of the eleven songs presented had yet to grace an Experience album. In the place of signature songs like “Purple Haze” and “All Along The Watchtower” were confident renditions of “Izabella” and “Hear My Train A Comin’”. At midnight, Kip Cohen, the venue’s master of ceremonies, rang in the new year and decade buffeted by Guy Lombardo’s “Auld Lang Syne”.
Never one to be upstaged, Jimi and company greeted the joyous house with their own inspired reading of the holiday staple. For Amalie Rothschild, the Fillmore East’s house photographer, the experience was an unforgettable one.
“Then there was the countdown at midnight. It was the countdown that was a real scream. We’re talking about the end of the Sixties. December 31, 1969 turning into January 1, 1970–.A new decade. This was significant. After all, we were living through it and we knew that the Sixties were the Sixties. We had this big countdown on the [Joshua White] light show screen with this big clock 10, 9, 8, 7, 6…and everybody is yelling together.
Then the light show screen pulls up and everybody is on stage–all the crew and the musicians. Hendrix, who is now on stage, launches into this amazing rendition of ‘Auld Lang Syne’ and I filmed it [excerpts of Rothschild’s color film footage can be seen in the VHS/DVD Band Of Gypsys]. This was history in the making. You could not miss this. His performance was just so inspired. It was just terrific and I can’t find the words to describe it.”
The recordings which make up both Band Of Gypsys and its two disc sequel Live At The Fillmore East certainly bear out Rothschild’s remembrances. Jimi’s celebrated work with the Band Of Gypsys stands among his most impressive and lasting achievements. After the show, Ian Dove of Record Mirror interviewed Jimi Hendrix for the January 10, 1970 edition of the British paper.
Later that night, Hendrix retreated to The Café Caliph (previously known as The Café Au Go Go) in Greenwich Village where he joined The James Cotton Blues Band on stage for a jam.
What a way to bring in the New Year watching Jimi perform. Happy New Year hopefully Covid will have less of an impact in 2022.
I read somewhere that Ed Chalpin a record producer from Jimi’s early days, won the rights to the proceeds of The Band of Gypsys album after winning a breach of contract case. He claimed Jimi signed a contract with him but left for London with Chas Chandler.
January 1, 1970
Band of Gypsys New Year’s Day performances
Having just successfully completed two sold out performances at the Fillmore East, the previous night, the Band of Gypsys New Year’s Day performances were solidifying them as one of the most recognizable sounds in modern music. Just as with the two shows the preceding night Wally Heider and Eddie Kramer also recorded this performance. The results of which have been released as Band Of Gypsys (Experience Hendrix/Capitol Records, 93446-2) and Hendrix: Live At The Fillmore East (Experience Hendrix/MCA, MCAD2-1111931).
As the Band Of Gypsys hit the stage the crowd explodes into applause as the three neighborly musicians break into a barrage of musical attacks, bouncing melodic beats of musical affection off each other. The mesmerizing opening statements of the newly formed Band of Gypsys implanted a new brand of funky rock-inspired blues in the audience’s head.
“His playing is so loud, so fluid and so rife with electronic distortions that it resembles that of no other currently popular performer,” reported Mike Jahn for The New York Times (January 2, 1970). Lead guitarist Jimi Hendrix was once again joined on stage by bassist, Billy Cox and drummer, Buddy Miles for their new collaboration of roaming and experimental sounds.
The Band Of Gypsys first set featured performances of “Who Knows,” “Machine Gun,” “Changes,” “Power Of Soul,” “Stepping Stone,” “Foxey Lady,” “Stop,” “Hear My Train A Comin’,” “Earth Blues,” and “Burning Desire.”
As Rolling Stones’ Loraine Alterman reported, “at the first show on New Year’s Day, the audience really let loose with cheers only on the old “Foxey Lady.” In all fairness, however, his second show reportedly went over much better especially when he and Miles sand a pleas for unity about how we’ve all got to live together, a song did together in a jam at the Newport ’69 festival in Los Angeles.
“In the end, though, Hendrix is a musician, not a contortionist or juggler. If the fans can forget the visual show and if Hendrix can come up with a new approach to material for a Band Of Gypsys, he’ll remain a heavy on the scene.”
After a brief intermission the Band Of Gypsys returned for a second set highlighted with “Stone Free,” “Little Drummer Boy,” “Power Of Soul,” “Changes,” “Message To Love,” “Earth Blues,” “Machine Gun,” “Voodoo Child (Slight Return),” “We Gotta Live Together,” “Wild Thing,” “Hey Joe,” and “Purple Haze.”
Alfred Aronowitz of The New York Post interviews Hendrix for a piece in the January 2, 1970 edition. Inside Aronowitz explains Hendrix’s musical change saying, “Jimi had chosen the New Year, and as he put it, the new decade to unveil his new trio… What’s the reason for the change? ‘Earth, man, earth,’ Jimi said. With his old group, The Jimi Hendrix Experience, the music has been too far out in space. ‘Now I want to bring it down to earth,’ Jimi said. ‘I want to get back to the blues, because that’s what I am.’ The new group has a new repertoire, but during his first set last night, Jimi was still waving his freak flag.
“There had been plans for Jimi to go back on tour with The Experience accompanied once again by Mitch Mitchell on drums and Noel Redding on bass, but after the show Jimi had changed his mind. ‘With Mitch, maybe, but not with Noel, for sure.’ He said. ‘That’s another thing. This is more of a real thing. We’re trying to get it on its feet. We’re waiting for Stevie Winwood. If I can get ahold of him and he agrees to it, that’ll be another voice. We’ll have harmony for days.’ The name of Jimi’s new group, incidentally, is A Band Of Gypsys. ‘That’s what we are,’ said Buddy. ‘That’s what all musicians are, Gypsies.’”
Hi Ivana, the photos do look great posted. Not sure who would have been the replacement but someone consistent with the Experience sound. Most of the top drummers were already in a band but it was rumored Ginger Baker was looking to join up with Jimi and form a supergroup.
Loving these photos so clear. Interesting that Jimi went back to Mitch and continued working with Billy Cox after the Band of Gypsys. It’s a shame Billy fell ill during Jimi’s European tour. I wonder who Jimi would have replaced him with if he hadn’t died.
One of the ads for the 1/1/70 show at the Fillmore East.
Jimi said in 1969 he was trying to get together with Steve Winwood after Blind Faith dissolved but that never came about since he re-formed Traffic. If that happened Jimi wouldn’t have died at the Samarkand.
Hi Jason, I think Jimi dreamed about having a bigger band with a broader sound. He tried that at Woodstock with Jerry Velez and Juma Sultan but I always thought did Jimi really need them there.
Ginger Baker would have been a great asset having played with Eric Clapton and Cream. I’ve seen the two covers of the Band of Gypsys album; the one with just Jimi is the one I have, and the one with the three dolls/puppets representing the band.
Hi Ivana,
Jimi probably would have had a broader sound if he had Ginger Baker in his band since he was a jazz influenced drummer. Baker incorporated African style music when he worked with Fela Kuti and maybe Jimi would have adopted a similar style.
Despite various music movements like Punk/Glam/Romantic/Heavy Metal, Jimi has stood the test of time.
Indeed he has, and you will always hear Jimi Hendrix on Classic Rock stations today as other bands and artists are really no longer played anymore.
A few years ago, I read an archived article that came from a writer in The Los Angeles Times newspaper right after Janis Joplin’s death in October 1970, and he made the tremendously fallacious assumption that in “40 years from now nobody will even remember who Jimi Hendrix or Janis Joplin was and their music will no longer be heard”. Over 50 years later, their music is still going strong and enjoyed by people of all ages. That’s how good their music is and the influence they still continue to have over generations of people all over the world.
January 8th is Elvis Presley’s Birthday. The King would have been 87 years old. Although, some conspiracy theorists claim he’s “still alive” today via fake stories and phony pictures.
Here’s the first faked circulated photo of Elvis back in 1978 depicting him through his pool house door window. Many people offered this as proof of him still being alive as it appeared in select fan magazines. So, the tin foil hat conspiracies started not too long after his death and continue to this very day.
Hi Jason, This is just too funny. Have you noticed how these photos are always blurred because if they weren’t then you’d soon realise this wasn’t Elvis at all. Goes to show how much people are willing to believe where Elvis is concerned.
Reminds me of people who claim they saw flying saucers and have had close encounters with aliens. It happens to a small number and in remote locations so it can’t be verified. Why doesn’t the space craft land in a park in a city location like in the movie The Day The Earth Stood Still. 😂
Hi Ivana, all these photos are either blurred or smeared to give the illusion that it’s Elvis or whatever person these hoaxers are trying to claim to be. They took a distorted image of Elvis’ face and placed it at the bottom window which makes no sense. But many people believed it to be true so their hoax was successful in that regard.
I read an article where in the 80’s these hoaxers used Elvis impersonators to claim he was still alive. They would take pictures of the impersonator from a long distance claiming it was the real Elvis in small towns in America so he wouldn’t be noticed by the public in larger cities. A few years ago there was some guy with white hair and a beard at Graceland who they claimed was Elvis.
Hi Jason, We had a programme over here called Hey Hey It’s Saturday that ran for decades. There was a segment Red Faces where people would come on and perform. A group of Elvis impersonators sang Viva Lasagne instead of Viva Las Vegas because of Elvis’ weight gain.
Haha that would have been funny to have watched.
Some conspiracy theorists tried to claim Jimi is still alive but didn’t go to the extent they did with Elvis. For Jimi, they make up phony murder conspiracies.
Just like Michael Jeffrey supposedly telling Tappy Wright he murdered Jimi. Never happened. Like we know Michael was in Spain but that “small” detail didn’t stop these dumb conspiracy theories. Wright even admitted he made the whole thing up.
Conspiracy theorists are looking to sucker people who are unknowledgeable about the facts of Jimi’s death. When they try to push their conspiracy theories on people who know the facts their bogus conspiracies are easily debunked.
Michael Lang=Woodstock RIP. 💐
Ronnie Spector RIP💐
We are losing all our legendary performers.
My friend obtained a 10 minute soundless footage reel of Jimi in concert with the Experience and it’s in excellent quality. It appears to be one of the last few concerts Jimi had with Mitch and Noel.
Wow! Just priceless. I wonder what year it was.
Had to have been late 1968. The film starts off panning people in the crowd and then swings to Jimi on stage playing guitar. After a couple of minutes it zooms in on Mitch and then Noel and then back to Jimi. Then it pans back showing the band finish whatever song they were performing. Noel had more bushy hair and Jimi looks like he did in 1968 so that’s when I’m assuming it was. I believe it was footage from a local tv station. Really a shame it wasn’t longer and there wasn’t sound on this short film. But it was nice to see. There’s also one of Led Zeppelin and it appears to be from one of their early shows.
Hi Jason, I found a list of tv shows Jimi appeared on in England but these seem to be from 1967: Ready Steady Go, Top of the Pops, Dee Time, Fanclub and the Lulu Show.
Here’s the Elvis imposter, with the white hair and the beard, that conspiracy theorists claim is Elvis Presley still “alive and well”. This phony even posed for pictures to keep the scam going. What a joke, he’s supposed to be in hiding but takes the time to pose for photos with fans. LOL.
Hi Ivana,
Jimi appeared on all those early shows for promotion. All were great performances.
Woodstock is being shown on TV next Tuesday probably to commemorate the passing of Michael Lang. Always a pleasure to watch. 🎶
Today January 19th would have been Janis Joplin’s 77th birthday. Conspiracy theorists are making up new bogus stories about her death. It never ends.
These hoaxers failed to see the needle marks on Janis’ arms. There’s nothing or someone behind her sad death only her drug addiction.
Hi Jason, I came across a thread called readysteadygone.co.uk Flights of Fantasy? Our ‘friend’ had been posting his long winded ridiculous comments/claims until July 18, 2021. He mentions both of us and the Velvet Rocket in one of his posts.
Hi Ivana,
I’ll have to check out his ridiculous comments. Maybe he was banned there too. He was angrily ranting about me at couple of other places where he was at posting too. We both destroyed all his phony claims and he still can’t handle it. Lol.
Meat Loaf, 74. RIP💐
Hi Ivana,
I’ve seen this site before but I haven’t seen “our friend’s” recent comments lol.
Long winded indeed, it’s the same old fictional nonsense he repeats over and over. Boring and nothing but fantasy. When I get time I think I’ll respond to him.
I think it’s either on page 2 or 3 on that site, where “our friend” used his “alfieneumann” pseudonym to agree with himself in the comments. The same name he used to attack us on here.
Pretty sad life he lives bouncing around from one site to another to push a phony made up conspiracy hoping to get people to follow him. 12 years and counting where he has nothing to show for his hoax except for being banned from nearly everywhere he posts.
I like how he still claims to be “The world’s greatest authority and expert on Jimi Hendrix” 🤣 🤣🤣
Hi Jason, He needs to convince himself that he’s an expert because no-one thinks so. Just self promotion and self delusion. 😂
He is a laughing stock wherever he posts.
The death of Ronnie Spector got me thinking about some of the popular all girl groups that had hits in the sixties: The Supremes, The Marvellettes, Martha and the Vandellas, The Ronettes, The Shirelles, and the Shangri-Las. 😀
Don’t forget about The Crystals…..all of those groups were amazing acts. There isn’t too many stations left that play their music anymore as more of the 60’s stations are being replaced with 80’s pop instead.
Mark Hess the Hendrix “murder” hoaxer is having trouble getting funding for his joke of a documentary. He’s asking people to help fund the project and nobody is donating so far.
He can always ask Buster for help. I’m glad this nonsense documentary will never get off the ground, Mark will be heading off into obscurity sooner than he thought.😂
Yeah, the “world’s greatest Hendrix authority” should fund the entire project. 🤣
Not even the most obscure production companies wanted to touch this fraud documentary which is why Hess is now begging for public donations. This fool should be extremely embarrassed.
There’s nothing worse than a desperate conspiracy theorists. 😀
Watched the documentary about Woodstock on Tuesday night, the music never seems to date. Apart from Jimi’s standout performance, the other terrific guitarists who played at the concert like Carlos Santana, Pete Townsend and Alvin Lee. I remember going to a sixties exhibition at the museum and they had the outfit Roger Daltery wore at Woodstock on display. It was just so tiny he must have been really slim. The Beatles suits were equally as tiny.
That must have been fun looking at the suits and memorabilia on display. Were those the Beatles Sgt. Pepper suits? I would say the best music of all time was from 1966-1976.
Hi Jason, The black/dark suits with the tiesThe Beatles wore on stage. They were all so slim back then.
I bet. I’m glad they were able to save these outfits and other artifacts for historical purposes.
Watched School of Rock starring Jack Black last night. This film is a musical education in itself: T-Rex, The Who, The Clash, The Doors,Cream, Ramones, AC/DC, Metallica, Black Sabbath, Deep Purple, Led Zeppelin, David Bowie and Stevie Nicks. Clips of Jimi and Keith Moon performing at the Monterey Pop Festival are shown. 🎸
Lots of of great music and clips are featured!
“Our friend” never fails to try to get his lies and conspiracy theories out there on the internet. He even has other people to help push his lies after he gets banned. This guy has a few screws loose and it’s a shame other people will do his bidding for him.
From a forum owner:
“A member of this forum alerted me to the fact that one of our current members was essentially the opinions of a banned member – in this case Brian Doyle.
What this issue has raised – and it is why I closed the thread till I could find an answer to it – is that if allowed to continue a banned member ( in this case Brian Doyle ) has now found a voice on our forum through another member. Whether witting, or unwitting, the current member has allowed himself to become the surrogate through which this banned member is now able to continue posting.”
This is not something the members of the admin team can allow to continue. In the next few hours the rules are going to be edited to reflect this change in what is acceptable on our forum. From this point on – even though the rules are yet to be edited – it will be an offence for any current member to voice the opinions and theories of any banned member.
Any current member found to be doing that will immediately be place on “two posts a day” – which as everyone knows is actually a euphemism for being denied posting rights. The term of the punishment will be determined by admin. There will be no fixed term, the term therefore could be a short or long period as determined the members of the admin team.
From a forum member:
“Doyle is a HUGE manipulator. He tried all days to induce me to post messages by him here. I did not.”
Since we revealed his other pseudonyms he has now stooped so low that he is getting other persons/people to speak on his behalf. My wish is that Doyle has no voice or place for his constant lies.
Doyle is using Hess to push these bogus Hendrix conspiracies as both of these clowns are telling the same phony stories.
Bogus quote #1 (made up Crompton story):
“Crompton wasn’t perfect on everything…I think he was trying to get rid of Kathy so he simply went along with the barbiturates being responsible. We know that the investigation was corrupted. The same people who corrupted the original investigation got to Crompton and he did not pursue the new evidence Kathy revealed.”
Contradictory quote #1:
“those ambulance men are focused on first aid and applying procedures that would help Jimi survive.”
Contradictory quote #2:
“the pillows, bed coverings, and blankets were an absorbent material that would soak up the liquid wine over the 6 hours Jimi lay dead on the bed.”
These are Doyle conspiracies but now Mark Hess is parroting them.
Quote #1 is a fake made up claim in order to dismiss the fact that Jimi died of an overdose. Doyle makes up a fake claim that Crompton wanted to get rid of Kathy so he just agreed with her that barbiturates killed Jimi. Totally pathetic. And once again, he tells us “people got to Crompton” but never tells us who those “people” were. First he claimed it was only Jeffery involved, but he died in 1973, so now Doyle invented “people” still being involved to keep this scam going.
Quote #2 has Jimi “still being alive” according to Doyle as the ambulance men were “applying life saving procedures”. We all know Jimi was already dead, but Doyle the hoaxer needs Jimi to be alive for phony “procedures at the hospital” with Quack Bannister.
Quote #3 shows Doyle admitting Jimi was dead which totally contradicts his Quote #1 and his phony “procedures at the hospital” conspiracy theory. But Doyle tells his famous “super absorbent sheets” tale again that soaked up every drop of wine which he says the ambulance men couldn’t see. Guess all the “pure wine and waterboarding scene” that Doyle was parroting for years quickly dried up after a quick story change. lol
No doubt these are the phony stories of one Brian Doyle, but hoaxer wannabe Mark Hess is using these same stupid stories to keep this hoax going. Nobody is donating for his lame documentary. These two clowns won’t be in the film making business.
Hi Jason, I hope Kathy responds to this rubbish. Those super absorbent sheets tale is just so ridiculous, so that’s how Doyle explains away his wine myth. What happened to his other lie about Bannister removing bottles of wine from Jimi. Doyle must have forgotten about this. This clown is just stumbling over his own feet. Doyle and Hess are just in the business of churning out more and more conspiracy lies after their original myths have been destroyed and debunked. They are foolish myth makers who no-one should take seriously. They don’t care about Jimi at all; they want to draw attention to themselves and get publicity. That’s their game.
Hi Ivana,
Kathy could easily debunk these lies herself if she spoke out about It. Don’t forget, Doyle has lied before claiming the he and Kathy were “good friends” and she was “holding back” crucial information regarding Jimi’s death. She should sue him for defamation.
Doyle has always been trying to gain relevance with his fake conspiracies. That’s why he latched on to former Hendrix hangers on like the Aleem Twins and former Hendrix side men like Juma Sultan to push these lies. He now has a clown like Hess thinking he can profit off these fake “murder” claims. He doesn’t care about Jimi at all he just wants his name out there so his lies can be promoted. That’s why he becomes so angry when he lies are laughed at and debunked because is unable to get anywhere with his lies.
All trying to profit from Jimi one way or the other. Kathy would never withhold crucial information about Jimi’s death. If anything she was the one who tried to find out what were the circumstances surrounding Jimi’s death. Tin foil hatters do the exact opposite they just invent ridiculous fantasies so far removed from what really happened to Jimi. 😏
What’s bad about their fake conspiracies is that they slander and defame these individuals who aren’t able to defend themselves since most of them are deceased.
Tin foil hatters invent phony stories to cover up the facts they don’t like. When evidence or an individual exposes them as frauds they will immediately attack that person’s credibility. Doyle has done that to us, Kathy, Crompton, Teare, Thurston, Brown, ambulance men, Perrin, and whoever spoke the truth.
Spot on Jason, I’m still waiting for Doyle’s book to come out. I always check out the fiction section of my local bookstore. Hess ‘documentary’ looks like it’s heading in the same direction-a total non-event.
Or at the checkout stand at the grocery store next to the Weekly World News. 🤣
No film production company wanted anything to do with this nonsense otherwise it would have already been up and running.
Hess first claimed it was a “done deal” and the only reason for the hold up was they had to “iron out a few details”.
Then as more time passed, he had to admit the whole “fell through” as he made up some lame excuses for the reasoning.
So, in ordsr for it to happen, Hess had to beg for public funding to get it started but nobody wants to put money into this sham. Even the couple of tin foil hatters that supported the endeavor has passed funding it. And that’s a good thing, because outright lies has no business being called a “truthful documentary”.
Doyle has a habit of backing feeble projects. Another documentary maker, I forget his name, had supposedly been working on a film about Jimi for many years but I’ve yet to see it. Hess has gone the same way-what do you expect when you’ve got the support of a ridiculed tin foil hatter who has been banned from all the credible Jimi Hendrix sites. 🤪
Hi Ivana,
Is that the imaginary film that’s supposed to reveal that Jimi was soaked in imaginary wine from head to toe? The film Doyle talked about for years?
Hess thought he had a money making scheme and it never even got off the ground.
Hi Jason, That’s the one. I think it had been in the making for 10 years, and like all of these sorts of ‘documentaries’ they are supposed to tell us the ‘truth’ What a joke!
10 long years of the longest “documentary” in the making and the amazing duo of Hess & Doyle can’t even get theirs off the ground. 🤣🤣🤣
He looks like a total moron hyping the thing and now he can’t get any support for it.
Hess & Doyle has a nice moronic ring to it.
Came across a new conspiracy that President Obama is Jimi’s son. And the list goes on. 😂
Haha and Jimi then became Morgan Freeman for all these decades.
No real rock star that knew Jimi ever came out to verify these phony conspiracies, it was only these obscure jokers who did so they could get publicity and attempt to make money off Jimi’s name.
Exactly Jason, I’ve noticed it’s always the ones who had a very remote association with Jimi or were acquaintances but not in Jimi’s inner circle who seem to fall for this rubbish or make-up outright lies.
Tappy “The Fraud” Wright had minimal involvement with Jimi’s management for a brief amount of time but he pretended to have a large role with Hendrix. He was the instigator in the “murder” conspiracy and the other jokers thought they could profit off it too. Like I told “our friend” several times, if there was any actual truth to these claims it would have been revealed back in the 70’s not decades later in useless books that nobody cared to read.
The whole murder conspiracy is just a waste of time. What does it hope to achieve since all of supposed murderers are dead. And that’s probably why it keeps going and is so appealing to tin foil hatters because they know all too well their claims can’t be verified. “Our friend” seems really fond of seeking out sick old men to interview. All the earlier biographies never mentioned wine and Dr Teare would not have missed something so obvious or significant. The Vesparax caused Jimi’s death.
These conspiracy theorists know full well all the main players are dead so they can get away with defaming them without any repercussions. Also, since they are dead they can’t debunk these lies.
I’ve noticed “our friend” made a recent video with an old man who claims to have been part of Jimi’s management. Once again, he was pressuring the old guy to confirm the bogus “murder” conspiracies. Doyle likes to manipulate people, so he seeks out old people in ill health attempting to take advantage of their vulnerabilities.
Doyle hounded and pressured a very ill Bob Levine in his nursing home by sticking a camera in his face trying to get him to say Michael Jeffery “murdered Jimi with wine”. You could see how sick Levine was and how this “interview” truly upset him. Levine never said anything about Jeffery killing Hendrix but Doyle lies claiming he made that admission. Levine sadly passed away a few months later. When Levine was in better health a few years earlier, he vehemently denied Tappy Wright’s bogus “murder” story calling it ‘bullshit’ in the press on more than one occasion.
Doyle is a snake and will do anything to keep this lie going because he wants publicly looking to make a profit off a bogus conspiracy. He’s failed miserably and I’m still waiting for his “best selling book” to go on sale. 🤣
Hi Jason, I saw that recent video with the frail old man. Doyle had those sheets of paper that looked suspiciously like he was reading from a script. As for Levine he never said that Jeffrey murdered Jimi but Doyle insisted that he had. We have proof of that because Doyle said it on this thread in some of his earlier posts. I’ve got a good title for Doyle’s book:’Jimi Hendrix Murdered and Other Lies I Have Told’.🤪
Hi Ivana,
The old guy was never a person of significance in Jimi’s management and Doyle put him out there as a prop for his scam. Doyle is looking for any acquaintance associated with Jimi to agree with his nonsense so it appears his conspiracies are legit. He probably couldn’t remember his conspiracy theories so he needed some script notes to recite them on camera.
Doyle wants us to believe in his fantasies. Nowhere in that video did Levine ever say “Jimi was murdered”. Doyle was trying extremely hard to pressure Levine into saying it as he was leading Levine with his conspiracy.
Doyle lied in his posts here claiming Levine admitted to “Jimi being murdered by wine”. After I called out that lie, Doyle changed his story and said Levine admitted to it him “off camera”. Doyle is a joke and all his big “evidence and revelations” are always “off camera”.
Great book title for him. Another one would be “Jimi Hendrix ‘murder conspiracies’ from a tin foil hatter”.
Doyle changes his story when he’s cornered. You don’t interview someone hoping for the big reveal only to be told something significant off camera if you want your story corroborated. That’s just plain dumb.
Doyle also changes his stories when his lies are exposed.
Doyle accused Kathy Etchingham of withholding important evidence in Jimi’s case and he even went as far to cryptically hint at Kathy admitting in a “private phone call” that Jimi didn’t die from a drug overdose. He has no proof of this exchange and Kathy certainly wouldn’t waste her time talking with a clown like Brian “Albert” Doyle.
Doyle is a pathological liar. When he has no proof of real evidence, his “go to” line is “they told me privately”. He does this so he can keep his scam going without having to provide any real evidence. That’s what frauds do and he is indeed a fraud.
Spot on Ivana.
In Doyle’s fantasyland, all these people only reveal the “truth” privately to Doyle and never tell anybody else.🤣
The best story he told was unidentified “medical experts” called him a “genius” for his “forensic analysis” regarding an overdose of Vesperax.
Hi Jason, Doyle is a lying fraud; that about sums him up. No-one thinks he’s a genius it’s a matter of trying to build himself up like when he says he’s an expert in the Jimi Hendrix story. He has been banned from major Jimi Hendrix sites, interviews sick old men who had remote connections to Jimi at best, claims he’s spoken to people who tell him important info off camera, maintains he is writing a book about Jimi’s death, backs supposed ‘documentary’ makers who produce nothing, and has spoken on radio to a DJ who suspected Doyle was a tin foil hatter peddling a conspiracy. Yes Doyle is a real expect and genius in his own lunchbox. 😂
LOL. You summed up Doyle perfectly. Had a good laugh at your comment. 🤣
Doyle invents stories of people talking to him to reveal what he calls evidence just to give his nonsense some credibility. They wouldn’t be talking to Doyle if that had real evidence they’d be going to the authorities like Kathy did with her investigation.
Hi Jason – oh Christ that imbecile Doyle isn’t still banging on is he ?
Hess hasn’t posted for a while. Maybe he gave up on his film making career.🤣
The ship has well and truly sunk. Absolutely no support or interest.
Another day and no Hess.😃
Ivana, your comment above about Doyle is spot on. Doyle is a nobody and these people wouldn’t reveal crucial information of a crime to only him. He says they tell him this stuff “off camera” so he can still claim he has “murder evidence” to keep promoting his scam.
When I called out the ridiculous “Aleem Twins” story Doyle was promoting, I told him if they had evidence of a “murder conspiracy” between Monika and Mike Jeffery, they would have went to the authorities in 1970 and not have waited 45 years to reveal it in a book for profit. Doyle became angry and started making up lame excuses as to why they didn’t. So, Doyle invents a fake story to cover for his other fake story. All of his claims are stories with no facts or evidence. I found out that he was recently banned from a political forum for spreading conspiracy theories with no evidence to prove. When he was called out for his lies he started attacking members for not “listening to his good evidence”. He does that on every site he infiltrates mostly under the identity of “scrum drum”.
Someone on another site that knows of him says he listed himself as an “independent researcher” but has no contacts or sources listed which would give him credibility. And we know why that is. 🤣
Hi Jason, I’m glad people are aware of what Doyle is really all about. Attacking others who don’t agree with his opinions is a tactic he uses. Whether he uses scrum drum or one of his other pseudonyms his posts are basically identical-thin on facts. How convenient it was for the Aleem Twins to overhear a conversation that never took place between Monika and Michael Jeffrey admitting to a murder that never happened. I’m sure their book ended up in the same bargain basement bin as Tappy Wright’s book. 😀
Hi Ivana,
Doyle is a clown. Once you challenge his nonsense and expose it as tin foil hattery he will attack and try to silence you. We saw him do that to us here. Doyle holds a grudge against anyone who calls him out. He also maniacally rants about the people he had feuds with over the years on various sites. He uses the same gimmick everywhere he posts. Doyle pretends to be superior to everyone else demanding that you agree with him. If you don’t, he calls you a “troll” denying his “good evidence”. His “evidence” is total nonsense he makes up. Once his claims are exposed as a lie, he tries to cover himself with another made up lie to keep it going. Doyle is a story teller and a very bad one. He desperately wants recognition from real researchers and journalists, so he makes up stuff in order to be seen on their level, but whoever comes across Doyle sees him as a joke.
The “Aleem Twins” invented a fake story about Dannemann and Jeffery 40+ years later for an useless book that nobody cared to read. Doyle was heavily promoting their fake story on every website he could. Doyle was even on Amazon under the reviews section trying to promote “The Aleem Twins'” lie. And the only comments and positive reviews listed was from Doyle himself posting under his various pseudonyms trying to give the “book” credibility. Surprisingly enough, his “Flyswatter” pseudonym came out of hiding to agree with himself on Amazon reviews just like he did for years on here and other sites. 🤣
Here’s a clip from the 1974 program “Good Night America” that features the death of Jimi Hendrix. Eddie Kramer said Jimi’s death was an accident and did not believe that Jimi took his own life even though he was really depressed at the time.
The “Aleem Twins” also make an appearance talking about Jimi’s drug use when he returned from England being depressed. No mention from Aleem “waking up from a nap on the couch” to hear Monika and Jeffery having a conversation about “murdering” Jimi. That fake story was invented 40 years later when they needed money to promote their useless book.
Once again, the phony Jimi Hendrix “murder” conspiracy has been debunked.
And if you check out the comments in this video, “our friend” Brian Doyle appears under his “Exiles800” pseudonym to keep pushing his Hendrix “murder” fantasy. What a total clown this guy is.
Report On Jimi Hendrix Death | Good Night America (May 1st, 1974)
Hi Jason, The Aleem Twins were also in the Warner Bros documentary of the early seventies funny how they failed to mention Jimi’s murder then and there but decide to spill the beans in their dumb book decades later. If they were really Jimi’s good friends they would have spoken up much earlier in defence of their friend. As for Doyle we know full well what he’s tactics are and what he’s capable of. We’ve managed to expose him for what he really is-a lying fraud who invents different names for himself to make it look as if he has support from others. The opposite is true.
Hi Ivana,
Yeah, the ‘Aleem Twins” were included in the Warner Brothers documentary, talked about Jimi in various 70’s music magazines, and appeared on other programs all in the 1970’s. Their phony “nap on the couch” story was never mentioned once. That’s because they made it up 40+ years later for their useless book.
Like I told our “friend’ in the comments, if the “Aleem Twins” were telling everybody about the “nap on the couch” story as Doyle claimed, it would have made it into the press during the 70’s and it would have been well known. The fact “the story’ never came out until these jokers wrote it in their book 40+ years later proves it was made up on the spot for a “hook” like all these other fraudsters do in order to attempt to sell copies.
I believe the “Aleem Twins” embellished their true relationship with Jimi over the years and their actions have shown them to be fraudsters using Jimi to make money off him. They sued Janie trying to steal Jimi’s guitar from her so they could auction it off for money and they made up an outrageous lie about Monika Dannemann and Michael Jeffery in order to sell a book. No real friend would ever do that.
I’m glad we both exposed Doyle’s conspiracy theories and lies. I will continue to do it. He is another fraudster making a mockery of Jimi’s death and we both know he is trying to profit off those lies.
Exactly Jason, All of these fraudsters are just trying to outdo one another to see who can come up with the most ridiculous story. The fact that the Hendrix Family never pursued any of these claims tells me they didn’t take any of them seriously. Doyle attaches himself to any Hendrix thread hoping for an audience but I get the feeling he has little or no support.
It all started with “The Grandfather of Wine” Fraud Bannister. He made up the Hendrix wine story because of the lawsuits he was facing during his medical malpractice and fraudulent conduct investigations in 1992. From there, Hendrix fraudsters used Bannister’s wine story as they added their own tale to promote their own Hendrix wine conspiracies. And as you said, they all tried to outdo each other with even more outrageous claims.
Jimi’s family never persued any of these charges since there was no truth to any of them. Tappy “the fraud” Wright admitted he lied in order to sell a book and all these conspiracy theorists push his fake Hendrix “murder’ conspiracy based on a lie. Sharon Lawrence is another one who lied about wine after she claimed Jimi committed suicide.
As I’ve said many times before, St. Mary Abbotts Hospital never said anything about “wine” resulting in Jimi’s death on 9/18/70. No word about wine in their media press conference, no mention in the media about wine, and Les Perrin Jimi’s press agent never said a word about wine. Jimi’s autopsy showed no “wine drowning” either. Jimi died from a drug overdose like the ambulance attendants found him, a police officer, all 3 doctors, and the hospital along with the autopsy confirmed.
Then 21 years later, all this imaginary wine appears out of nowhere coming from Fraud Bannister as he was under investigation. We also get phony stories of a “murder’ and a “cover up” from well known fraudsters who all have no evidence to prove their claims. They tell us we just have to believe what they say, even though they were all caught lying and contradicting themselves. What a joke.
Doyle attempts to seek out these fraudsters trying to “befriend” them in his quest to gain credibility for his “murder” conspiracy. He is either banned or laughed off every message board or site he goes on. The very few people who do tend to support his theories soon learn after a while the stuff he posts is b.s. and they can see him for what he is. There’s a couple of kooks that fall for his nonsense, but as we know, crazy conspiracy theorists will believe anything.
All these fraudsters have or will fall on their own swords eventually. You can’t sustain a conspiracy for very long as you’ll soon start to realise things just don’t add up. Apart from Bannister the thing that irritated me the most was how these fraudsters tried to make Drs. Thurston and Teare look like inept and corrupt individuals who changed their findings after being threatened. Really crazy stuff. 🤪
Hi Ivana,
Teare and Thurston’s evidence from Jimi’s autopsy destroys the fraudsters “murder” conspiracy so they need to attack and discredit them both to keep their scam going. Doyle does this all the time with his phony “cover up” claim. Hess was heavily promoting this same nonsense.
Hi Jason, Whatever suits their agendas. Doyle keeps adding more and more juicy “details” to the story like those supposedly super absorbent sheets to keep the gullible hooked. I wonder if they ever question where he gets his “information” from. I remember Doyle saying to Bob Levine that he had information that the FBI would be interested in, of course when I said to him you should contact them he declined to answer. I wonder why? Could it be that it was all coming from Doyle’s imagination. I think so. 😏
Hi Ivana,
Conspiracy theorists and tin foil hatters like Doyle invent new stories for excuses when they are caught in a lie or their propaganda has been debunked.
The “super absorbent sheets” is a perfect example. Doyle had no answer for why no wine was observed on the bed by the ambulance men. So, as the con artist he is, he invented the new phony claim that “super absorbent sheets” sucked up all the “gallons” of wine he claimed was flooding the bed.
Not only is that hilarious, but he debunked his own phony wine story he told for years of a massive “wine drowning” that showed a “homicide murder scene”. Now he’s claiming no wine was present all sucked up by bed sheets. And he was never in the room to know what kind of sheets were used so it makes his “story” even more hilarious. This all comes from his own imagination as nobody else has ever told any story like this before .
On a couple of sites, people have questioned Doyle’s phony claims. He either ignores them and writes long winded paragraphs hoping they forget they asked him “how he got his information” or he repeats his famous line “somebody told me privately this…”
We should know he has played that same game here.
Yeah, each time we tell Doyle to take his “information” to the authorities he becomes agitated and tells us “they are in on the cover up”. He won’t go to the authorities because he knows he has no “information” to give them and it’s all a scam.
If you read stories about some conspiracy theorists, they actually believe the conspiracy theory and try to come up with new claims to make the theory be true. In their minds, they can never admit that their theory was bogus so they invent stories so the theory can still be real in their mind no matter how ridiculous it sounds.
Hi Jason, One guest of the Samarkand Hotel wrote that he thought the furniture/furnishings hadn’t been updated since Jimi died there 50 years ago. Maybe Doyle should ring reception and ask them about those super absorbent sheets. 😁
Hi Ivana,
Doyle can do another one of his “famous interviews” where he tells us the Hotel manager told him “incriminating information” against Michael Jeffery “off camera” about those special super absorbent sheets. 🤣
All the gallons of wine Doyle claimed was present on the bed for a decade just simply dried up in one comment he made with his newly invented super absorbent sheets. Amazing!
Surprised he didn’t claim the mafia or the black panthers were testing the absorbency of the sheets to see if it could handle the 3, 5, 6 bottles of wine that was dumped on the bed. Every few years, Doyle increases the number of wine bottles. It’s up to 6 bottles now as of 2022. 🤣
I’m sure Doyle will say the manger told him we only use the best Egyptian cotton sheets from Harrods more than able to soak up gallons of wine. 🛏
LOL.
Doyle has now claimed to have “solved” the “murder case” with his “special witness”.
Hi Jason, I can’t stop laughing. Who is this special witness? Let me guess it’s Mr. Imagination. 🤥
It is hilarious. 🤣
He solved the “case” so get ready for his national press conference. LOL.
Maybe his “special witness” collected the imaginary bottles of wine.
Given the current situation, if Jimmy was alive today I feel he would support Ukraine in it’s fight for freedom from the Russian jackboot, yes ?
Love this song, one of my fave tracks, he had a great new slick sound on his last album, if only…..
Hi Jason, It took him 12 years to solve the case. If only his special witness had come forward sooner. LOL.
Hello EMIR, I sure Jimi would have been very concerned and saddened by the current situation. Machine Gun and the Star Spangled Banner were dedicated to conflict and war.
Still no sign of Mark Hess. The great “filmmaker” is still MIA. 🤣
Doyle’s “special witness” who can “crack the case” hasn’t emerged from the shadows yet.
What a horrible letdown this is. 🤣🤣🤣
Surprise! Surprise!. I won’t hold my breath for the big reveal. Doyle must be very red faced at the moment waiting for Mr. No Show. 🤐
Does that mean we have to wait 12 more years to find out? 🤣
Doyle is trying to make us believe he has information no-one else has. It’s all part of his game, and he’ll keep going with this scam for as long as he can. 12 years and counting. 🤪
Yep, that’s his scam. Doyle invents “information” to make himself look credible which he certainly is not. He then tells us the person told it to him “off camera”. He is a 🤡
Funny how Kathy’s investigation failed to reveal anything sinister in Jimi’s death except that it took Monika a while to call the ambulance maybe contributing to his death. The police, the ambulance officers, Drs. Teare and Thurston all agreed Jimi died of an overdose. Then decades later a tinfoil hatter named Brian Doyle, who has no connection to Jimi Hendrix, invents a gruesome story of murder that resembles a dumb D-Grade movie plot and he expects people to fall for this rubbish.
Hi Ivana,
Kathy’s investigation showed us that Monika lied about her stories because she wanted to distance herself from any involvement in Jimi’s death. We also learned that Jimi died hours earlier than what was being told by Monika, journalists, and reporters. Nothing nefarious came out of Kathy’s investigation which is why Scotland Yard never opened one up. There was no reason to. Jimi died of a drug overdose.
But a tin foil hatter named Brian Doyle in 2009 invents a “cover up” conspiracy claiming Scotland Yard was covering up “Jimi’s murder” refusing to investigate “what really happened”. Doyle also made a libelous charge saying Kathy wasn’t “telling us all she really knows” about Jimi’s death without a single shred of evidence. Doyle was literally accusing Kathy of withholding important and incriminating evidence from the public as he accused her of “covering up Jimi’s murder” in which there never was.
Doyle has been telling this fake story for 13 years now all over the internet, while adding new fantasy scenarios along the way to spice up his hoax. He recently brought out some old man who claimed to have been a “one time manager” of Hendrix hoping to get him to agree with his murder fiction claims on video. Doyle now claims to have a “special witness” who can “solve” the fictional murder tale but this “witness” never appears to spill the beans. Doyle is a well known con artist who invents total garbage trying to be relevant as his fantasy job as an investigative journalist.
Hi Jason, Doyle keeps adding to his endless list of witnesses and people who have told him information off camera. Scotland Yard would have been the ones to uncover anything suspicious but they never did. Doyle will do just about anything to bring attention to himself. But like all tin foil hatters he deliberately omits relevant information that doesn’t suit his agenda and adds his own fantasy plot.
Doyle suppresses the real evidence and inserts his fiction calling it “his evidence”. It’s nothing but his own made up tales hoping to get followers to agree with him.
All the evidence that debunks his fantasy tales he says it’s a “cover up” or he will personally attack the witness trying to discredit them with his own made up version of events.
Scotland Yard found nothing new since there wasn’t any new evidence to pursue.
That evidence ends Doyle’s hoax so he needs to lie about a “cover up” so he can push his phony Hendrix “murder” hoax for 13 years.
Hi Jason, Doyle seems like someone who is desperate to keep this conspiracy going as if he’s running out of time and influence. I doubt he has any real credibility or many followers. His supposed witnesses appear flaky and he backs documentary makers who don’t produce anything. People who were in Jimi’s inner circle wouldn’t be wasting their time talking to him.
Hi Ivana,
Doyle wouldn’t talk to people in Jimi’s inner circle that have credibility because that defeats his purpose to run his hoax. And they certainly wouldn’t waste their time talking to a clown like him.
Doyle only latches on to these old Hendrix acquaintances who make phony “murder” accusations so he can continue to push his hoax. He uses them hoping it will give his hoax some credibility. And there are only a couple of them like Aleem and Juma. Tappy “the Fraud” Wright is long dead. And Doyle has always claimed to be “good friends” with Fraud Bannister but has never produced any evidence that he ever spoke to him. Doyle was supposed to release his “Bannister interview” for years now but always made lame excuses as to why he couldn’t. The last one was a “glitched and corrupted file” prevented him from posting it. Before he was having “computer problems” and that lasted for several years. LOL
Everywhere I’ve seen Doyle post people laugh at him and think he’s a nut. And then he gets banned from posting for abusive behavior and refusing to provide evidence for his outlandish claims. He has a few conspiracy kooks on youtube that agree with him but conspiracy theorists will believe anything. Or it could be more of his pseudonyms he’s using to agree with himself so it looks like he has credibility in the comments for those reading it. We both know how this fraud operates.
Hi Jason, We’re both aware of Doyle’s tactics he never has any real evidence because it just doesn’t exist. As for Juma he also appeared in the Warner Bros documentary but said nothing about Jimi’s supposed murder. Both Juma and Aleem had nothing to do with Jimi’s success and their contribution to Jimi’s music is a small one.
If a “murder” took place, people would have been talking about it in 1970 and the years after. It was only a handful of people who had little involvement with Jimi like Aleem and Juma who made these outrageous “murder” claims decades later as an attempt to make money after Tappy Wright lied for his useless book. Not a single one of those liars were in London on September 18th. Tappy Wright lied and they used.the basis of his lie to invent their own tale. Nobody in Jimi’s inner circle or a top notch musician ever made wild conspiracy claims.
Today is a special day for Brian Doyle.
In the United States it’s April Fools Day.
Doyle is indeed a fool.
Enjoy your day Brian!
Spot on! Doyle = 🤥🤡🤪
What’s really unbelievable in this ridiculous murder plot is the part Monika and Michael Jeffrey were supposed to be involved in. According to tin foil hatters they were both Secret Agents sent to murder Jimi Hendrix. Monika was not a tall woman and Michael Jeffrey was no Mr. Universe so Jimi would have have fought them off easily and escaped. Who held Jimi down while the wine was being poured down his throat? Neither Monika or Michael would have been very effective in trying to hold Jimi down on the bed. 😂
Monika was like barely 5 feet and Jeffery was a very slender man, so the idea of these two individuals holding down Hendrix to administer pills and wine is laughable.
Tappy “The Fraud” Wright made up this fake account of Jeffery “murdering Hendrix with wine and pills”. His fake version is the only one that counts and he admitted it was a lie just to sell his book. Fraudsters like Doyle, Hess, and others do not get to invent their own version to make it more sinister just because Wright was exposed as a liar and it destroys their hoax. They know Wright’s story is a joke, so they add their own lies to Wright’s story in order to keep the scam going.
Wright’s fake story is easily debunked by Jimi’s autopsy report.
Wright claimed that Jeffery shoved several pills down Jimi’s throat and then poured bottles of wine down his throat. Pouring wine down Jimi’s throat would kill Jimi rather quickly, so there wouldn’t have been any time for the pills to register a lethal level of toxicity in Jimi’s system. Jimi’s system recorded a 0.7mg lethal level and no abnormal amount of alcohol was ever determined. Jimi could never have been “drowned in wine” since the 0.7mg proved it was a lethal overdose. Jimi would have already been dead before the pills took hold.
And why would Jimi allow two weaklings like Monika and Michael Jeffery to shove pills and wine down his throat? Hilarious.
Then we have tin foil hatter Brian Doyle desperately making up his own tales to keep this dead hoax alive. He made the asinine claim that Jimi was “vomiting up tons of wine” even though no wine was ever found on the bed or pillows. He also said many times that Jimi was filled up with “5 bottles of wine” (now he says it’s 6 bottles and seven years ago he said it was 3 bottles) from his stomach to his throat. Jimi would have been dead very quickly being filled up with wine from his stomach to his throat. It would be impossible for him to be vomiting since he would already be dead. And if Jimi was “vomiting wine”, then he wouldn’t be “filled up” with the wine from his stomach to his throat like Doyle claims.
So, either way Doyle is exposed as a lying clown and his fake stories goes up in flames.
Hi Jason, A lot has been made of that scarf around Jimi’s neck. The Samarkand garden shots show Jimi wearing a purple scarf; he passed out fully dressed and he would have been transported to hospital in the same clothes he was wearing in the photos unless he changed his clothing at the Cumberland Hotel.
Hi Ivana,
Monika claimed Jimi took a bath while he wrote his poem and changed his clothes before he went out. Her accounts should always be questioned but Jimi did go back to the Cumberland, and I’m sure he didn’t take a bunch of clothes to the Samarkand, so he most likely changed when he went back to his hotel.
Jimi owned a lot of scarves so we don’t know for sure if the scarf in the Samarkand photo is the same one he was wearing when he was found dead. If he changed his clothes he would probably wear a new scarf to go with his new outfit.
And for all we know, maybe Jimi wasn’t wearing a scarf when he died. Neither ambulance man said Jimi was wearing a scarf. Seifert only said Jimi was wearing “flamboyant clothes”. Fraud Bannister mentioned the scarf after he said Jimi was “naked” which wasn’t true. How can Jimi go from being completely naked to then wearing a scarf with clothes? That is not possible. So, Bannister’s credibility is always questioned and for good reason since his stories always change.
Jimi was usually wearing a scarf in photos and always appeared “tall” for marketing purposes. Bannister made the false claim that “Jimi was unusually tall” hanging off the trolley. Jimi was never that tall. So, it’s pretty obvious Bannister didn’t remember who Jimi Hendrix was because he had no idea who he was on Sept. 18, 1970 when Jimi was a superstar. He even admitted that. So it’s pretty obvious he looked at pictures in a book to refresh his memory on what Jimi looked like.
It’s fair to say that Bannnister was looking at old Hendrix photos in a book and assumed Jimi was “unusually tall” from the lay out of the pictures. Jimi probably was probably wearing a scarf in the photo too. So not knowing who Jimi was, Bannister created his phony account based on old pictures he saw in a book. Nobody else has ever said “Jimi was unusually tall”. And another claim Bannister made that gives credence to the old photos, is Bannister claimed Hendrix had “long hair” when in fact Jimi’s hair wasn’t as full in 1970. Jimi’s hair was full and wild in his 1968 photos when he appeared ‘taller’ than Mitch and Noel for marketing purposes. That would be the only way Bannister could say Jimi was “unusually tall” and with “long hair” is by assuming that from a photo. If he actually remembered Jimi on that day, he never would have given that false description.
Also, Bannister was quite vauge about Hendrix’s appearance in his first story saying he was “naked”. Then for his second story, he “suddenly remembered” clothes, a scarf, his hair, and being “unusually tall”. Pretty obvious he looked at picture in a book.
Bob Brown is still alive and if he was shown the Samarkand photos he would likely remember if that was the same outfit Jimi was wearing at St. Mary Abbotts.
.
Hi Jason, From what I’ve read Jimi was pretty meticulous with his grooming and bathing. Jimi and Monika went to the Portobello market where Jimi bought some clothing and then took them back to the Cumberland Hotel where I’m assuming he had a wash and change of clothing. I don’t believe Monika’s account that these took place at the Samarkand Hotel as Jimi wouldn’t have had a change of clothing there since he was not living with Monika despite what she said. Monika then conveniently omits their encounter with Harvey replacing it with dinner for two back at the Samarkand even though Slater noted there was no food and no evidence that any had been cooked. In an even more suspicious account the scarf is replaced with a towel around Jimi’s neck presumably to soak up those gallons of wine. We can’t really know he was wearing.
Hi Ivana,
Monika was exposed as a liar again as it was revealed her famous “spaghetti meal” was never cooked and their “intimate evening” did not take place. Jimi and Monika both spent the evening at Harvey’s residence where Monika stormed out in a jealous rage and began to verbally abuse Jimi outside the flat. Monika invented their “romantic evening” story to cover up the incident at Harvey’s so she wouldn’t be accused of killing Jimi with her pills.
Monika also lied about the party at Kameron’s. After their fight, Jimi did not want Monika there with his friends and associates and they didn’t either, so she made up a cover story for that as well. Monika claimed there was “bad people” at the flat and Jimi didn’t want her to be at risk. Total nonsense. If they were about to be engaged, Jimi would have wanted Monika there and all the guests would have been aware of this engagement. Monika needed a story to tell why she wasn’t at Kameron’s party so she made one up.
Liars like Monika tell the story but change the details cover for their lie. She said they spent the evening together, which they did, except it was at Harvey’s and not at the Samarkand. So, it would be fair to say Jimi changed his clothes, but it was at the Cumberland and not the Samarkand.
Hi Jason, I get the feeling that Monika realised she was incriminating herself after she told that German reporter she gave Jimi the pills. So she tried to cover her tracks whenever she could. I also think she hired a good lawyer who maybe was advising her on what she should say. Monika’s ‘relationship’ with Jimi only amounted to a few days even though she claimed they were together for 18 months. But even in those few days they actually spent more time in the company of other people than together. This wasn’t the rosy relationship Monika hoped for.
Hi Ivana,
Monika did incriminate herself by admitting she gave Jimi the pills. So, that’s why she came up with the “romantic evening” story because she couldn’t allow the incident at Harvey’s to come out. The authorities would make her a suspect in the case. That’s also why she made up the ridiculous “mafia poisoning” story to Glebbek a few years later in an interview so she could escape any responsibility of Jimi’s death.
Monika also changed her stories about the pills. She said the pills were strong and then lied saying they were weak to cover her tracks. Then she made up the “engagement” story and told three different versions of the times she said she woke up. All was done in order to cover her tracks.
It’s really a shame that Harvey couldn’t have come forward back then and Thurston didn’t grill Monika on her lies because Monika wouldn’t have gotten away with lying for all those years and she would have admitted the truth.
Hi Jason, The lies Monika told about her relationship with Jimi were designed to draw attention to herself and to promote her paintings. It took Kathy’s court case for Monika to come unstuck and to reveal the truth about her ‘relationship’ with Jimi. In photos taken at her house in Germany shortly after Jimi died Monika looks really happy and relaxed given that her fiancé passed away a few weeks before. It’s pretty obvious she exaggerated everything. I’m surprised Glebbek fell for her story about the mafia poisoning.
Each time Monika was interviewed she promoted one of her paintings. In the 70’s she appeared in fan magazines to show her drawings. In the 80’s and 90’s she did it on tv and for magazines. Maybe Glebbek knew it was a fake claim but used Monika to generate an audience for himself for his show and publications.
Before Mark Hess went missing in action from total embarrassment with his failed “documentary” attempt, he was hyping this “Hendrix show” with Doyle. Both of them were saying “the truth of Jimi’s murder is finally being investigated”. It was supposed to pave way for the “Hess documentary” which would “reveal the truth once and for all”. lol
I knew this “show” was going to be a total farce with no redeeming quality, but it’s even worse than I thought. Just another conspiracy theory and a poor attempt to manufacture controversy when there is none. Here is the description of this “show” and it’s not a very positive one either. So much for the “investigation into Jimi’s murder”.
“Romesh Ranganathan – a comedian with admittedly no experience of criminal investigations whatsoever – attempts to resolve the mysterious death of Jimi Hendrix, the maverick guitarist who was found dead in a Notting Hill flat in September 1970.”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0015xgh
As long as these conspiracies get put out as hypotheticals then the tin foil hatters use those baseless claims for their hoax. Programs like these are a waste of time and shouldn’t even be broadcasted since there’s no factual history to them. It’s basically a bunch of “what ifs” but the innuendo there is to make it look like “it is”. I guess later this year there is going to be one about Michael Jeffery with more of the same nonsense.
More suited to the programs Pointless and Would I lie To You.
Not sure if that comedian is hosting the Jeffrey hit piece but it’s gonna be more of the same bogus conspiracies and hypotheticals trying to insinuate he “murdered” Jimi.
Hi Jason, I can’t view this because I’m not in the UK but if a comedian is presenting it then how can it possibly be taken seriously. It’s just another one of those dumb conspiracy theory programs light on facts and full of innuendo. What a joke!
I laugh every time I read the word mysterious used to describe the death of Jimi Hendrix. There is nothing mysterious about his death; Jimi chocked on his own vomit after taking an incredibly high number of Vesparax.
Funny how Jimi’s death for 21 years was never “mysterious” until Fraud Bannister, Sharon Lawrence, Tappy Wright, and a few others tried to make it that way based on lies.
They are still pushing what Tappy Wright wrote even though he denied Jimi was murdered. LOL.
How do tin foil hatters explain how Michael Jeffrey went from being a secret agent with a supposedly promising career to the manager of a highly successful rock group? 😏
Tappy Wright was a clown and he proved he had no involvement with Jimi and Michael Jeffery.
Wright had no idea that Michael Jeffery was in Spain on the morning of September 18, 1970, but somehow he has Jeffery magically appearing at the Samarkand to shove pills and wine down Jimi’s throat in an act of “murder”. This phony “murder” claim is used by all tin foil hatters.
Wright also had no idea that Jimi’s contract with Jeffery was ironclad and still was under contact for 2 more years at Warner Brothers. There was no possible way for Jimi to leave Jeffery, so the whole premise of Wright’s “murder” accusation goes up in smoke.
Plus Wright admitted it was all a lie to Bob Levine in order to sell his useless book. So, Wright didn’t care what he wrote as long as his phony accusation sold copies of his book. It also proves he had no involvement with Jimi and Michael Jeffery because if he did, he would have known that Jeffery was in Spain and Jimi’s contract was ironclad. All this lie did was allow tin foil hatters to use the fake “murder” claim of “wine and pills” to concot their own fake versions of a Hendrix “murder” that never happened.
And how do tin foil hatters explain the fact that Jeffery signed the members of the Animals and Hendrix to ironclad contracts with no possible way of getting out until it expired?
Chas Chandler had to buy his way out of his contract in 1968 because Jeffery still owned him. That’s what Jimi was trying to do according to Douglas, so this nonsense of Jeffery “murdering” Jimi because he “fired him” is totally absurd. Kathy Etchingham saw the contracts and they lasted for 2 more years at Warner Brothers. And Jeffery never took out a $2 million life insurance policy on Hendrix it was the record company that did which is standard policy.
Tin foil hatter Brian Doyle made the bogus claim that Jeffery was assigned by MI-5 or 6 (which ever one he decides to use) to infiltrate rock groups and to bring them down. He says Jeffery was specifically assigned to Jimi Hendrix. This is an absolute joke because Hendrix was an unknown at the time and nobody knew he would blossom into a superstar. It was Chas Chandler who asked Jeffery to help him manage Jimi because he needed the financial support and connections to promote him. Same with the Animals, they were just the house band at Jeffery’s night club until he secured them a recording contract. All these conspiracy theories are easily disproven when you know the facts and actual history.
Hi Jason, Murdering the cash cow makes no sense at all since Jimi was still earning large amounts of money so it would have been a dumb move on Jeffrey’s part.
Hi Ivana,
It makes no sense which is why the conspiracy theory is stupid. Jeffery invested in Electric Lady Studios so he would want Jimi to record to make money not “murder” him to get no money coming in .
“He’d obviously been dead for at least half an hour,” Bannister said.
Fraud Bannister changed his story again. Now he says its only a “half an hour”. The time keeps getting shorter. Next time he will be telling us Jimi was “still alive”.
Bannister still admitted Jimi was dead when he reached the hospital. So, why would he claim to have “worked hard” on Jimi when he is saying Jimi was already dead for “30 minutes”? Nothing can be done to “save” a dead person. Another contradiction in Bannister’s web of lies.
Don’t believe a word he says. What happened to the wine oozing out of Jimi it must have magically dried up and disappeared. Bannister has told so many lies he’s forgotten what he’s said previously. LOL.
Hi Jason, As we know Jimi had been dead for more than half an hour. The damage done to his liver confirmed that he died several hours before. Bannister couldn’t have known this because the autopsy hadn’t been performed yet but the results show Bannister was lying. I think the “good doctor” likes to exaggerate his role in trying to “save” Jimi Hendrix. LOL.
Fraud Bannister clearly wants to be a fake hero for the history books as he is now pretending to have tried “to save Jimi Hendrix’s life”. Jimi’s actual time of death will never be known for sure but was estimated by Dr. Rufus Crompton to have been no later than 4 in the morning. Bannister is also on the record of stating Jimi Hendrix was already dead for several hours before he was brought in dead to the hospital. Now he’s claiming to have “worked hard on Jimi” when he’s still admitting that Jimi was dead for at least a half hour. It’s impossible to “work hard” on a dead man, even if that man has been dead for a half hour. Bannister’s phony claims are ridiculous and each time he opens his mouth for an interview we get a new story of what he claims happened.
Jimi was wheeled in dead at the hospital and the basic minimum protocol was done to establish an official death. Bannister was no hero and the official record from 9/18/70 proves that.
I like asking these tin foil hatters how it’s possible for Bannister to have “worked hard” on a dead man when Bannister himself admitted several times that Jimi was already dead when he was brought in. They have no answer and the only way their phony scenario would work is that Jimi would have to be still alive to get life saving procedures. They become angry and have no idea how to answer for their stupid conspiracy just like Brian Doyle who wants Jimi both dead and then alive to fit his fake narrative. They want to have it both ways which is exactly why their Hendrix fairy tale is pure fiction.
Jimi had the telltale signs of someone who had been dead for quite some time. The doctors would have never performed life saving procedures on Jimi. Dr Seifert did the minimum just to record a time of death. Bannister uses the half an hour excuse so that he can say he had a reason to perform his procedures on Jimi.
Dr. Brown was the only doctor who gave an accurate account of Jimi Hendrix’s arrival at the hospital. Brown told the truth and wasn’t looking for publicity or to be a phony hero. Tin foil hatters attack him for his honesty as they attempt to discredit his credentials because his accurate account dismantles the lies and conspiracies they push.
Brown said Jimi Hendrix arrived dead at the hospital and was dead for many hours when he was brought in. He said “nothing could be done for Jimi” meaning no phony procedures ever took place since no hospital would ever consider performing “procedures” on a long dead corpse.
Brown never said anything about “massive amounts of wine” since there was none. Brown accurately stated Jimi Hendrix died from an inhalation of vomit due to a barbitaute overdose early in the morning and that was his official cause of death determined by Dr. Thurston. Brown was the first doctor to witness a dead Jimi Hendrix and he never witnessed Jimi “covered in wine” which debunks Fraud Bannister and the tin foil hatters. That’s why they all go after Brown so hard trying to discredit him because his accurate account destroys their fantasy tale of imaginary wine and phony procedures.
Also, no documentation of these phony procedures exist on Jimi’s medical record which proves nothing was done just like Dr. Brown stated on more than one occasion. All you have to do is listen to the official statement from St. Mary Abbotts hospital on 9/18/70 where they announced to the media that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival from an overdose of drugs. Jimi’s own press agent Les Perrin confirmed it as well.
Then 21 years later, Fraud Bannister tried to change this documented event into his own fantasy tale along with these other fraudsters, but they can’t argue against a real documented event that already happened and the real evidence destroys their hoax every single time. They have no evidence to present so they argue phony made up claims and try to discredit all the evidence that is stacked against them.
Hi Jason, The only mention of alcohol was the blood content at the time of the autopsy. If wine had contributed in any way to the death of Jimi Hendrix Dr. Teare would have said so. But he never did. If alcohol had been the cause of Jimi’s death then his blood alcohol reading would have been much higher than it actually was just from the supposed waterboarding. That’s how we can tell this is all a fantasy coming from tin foil hatters.
Ivana, you said ealier “The only mention of alcohol was the blood content at the time of the autopsy.”
Yes, in his Post-Motem report Dr. Teare stated: “Analysis for ethanol failed to reveal more than 5 mg%.” He quoted that because at the time it was the legal limit for drunk driving.
He was more precise at the inquest saying that he found: “100 mil. % alcohol in urine but none in his blood”.
None!
Hi Ivana,
The only alcohol that registered was the low reading from wine that Jimi drank during the party. The wine never played a part in Jimi’s death.
The tin foil hatters claim Jimi was “drowned to death” in wine while he was still alive. Brian Doyle claims that 6 bottles of wine was poured down Jimi’s throat in an act of “murder”. He also says Jimi was alive to be vomiting up wine which debunks his claim of Jimi being filled with pure wine from his stomach to his throat. If Jimi was “vomiting up” all that wine, he wouldn’t be filled up to his throat like Doyle lies about. So, with his own asinine claims, he debunked himself.
If Jimi had all that wine poured into him, his blood alcohol level would have been astronomical, not to mention his stomach and throat tissues would have detected an abnormal amount of wine during the autopsy. None of that was ever found in 1970 because the fake wine claims were made up decades later.
Tin foil hatters like Brian Doyle knows their bogus theory doesn’t hold any water, so what fraudsters like him do to continue their hoax, is that they accuse famous and renowned doctors like Thurston and Teare of a sinister “cover up”. They accuse Teare and Thurston of purposely omitting all the “wine” in the autopsy (that they falsley claim was there) at the orders of Michael Jeffery. Tin foil hatters have no evidence of imaginary wine and no evidence of a “cover up” but they make these false and damaging accusations against these famous doctors to smear them in order to perpetrate their fictional hoax. It’s absolutely disgraceful and these fraudsters should be held liable for slandering the legacy and reputations of these men who can’t defend themselves because they are dead.
Hi Ivana,
Yes, if Jimi was force drowned in wine there would have been severe damage left behind and it would have been detected in Jimi’s autopsy conducted by Dr. Teare.
I told that to head tin foil hatter Brian Doyle in my Thurston post and he went berserk because he knew what I told him destroyed his entire hoax. Doyle then changed his entire decade long “forced wine drowning” story to a brand new story claiming “nobody would need to force wine into Jimi” which debunked his entire bogus “forced wine drowning murder” conspiracy theory. After I called him out on his “story change” exposing him as more of a fraud, he went berserk again demanding that I lose “my posting privileges”. Doyle knew he was sunk and his Hendrix hoax completely unraveled to where he could no longer embrace his decade long fantasy story of a “forced wine drowning”. An outraged Doyle took a couple of weeks hiatus from posting and then has attacked me ever since for exposing his lies.
Tin foil hatters don’t care about the truth, real evidence, or the facts. Their goal is to replace that with lies, innuendos, phony claims, and outrageous stories to keep promoting their hoax. When you expose their lies as we have done, the only option they have is to personally attack us, because they have no evidence to back up their lies since it’s all invented in their imagination.
Hi Jason, The part I found hilarious was that no-one needed to force wine into Jimi. Yes Jimi allowed himself to be waterboarded to death and he swallowed the wine willingly LOL. Doyle’s fits of rage are all fake, and he has a habit of either taking a break from posting or he withdraws from threads altogether. It’s all part of his sham tactics. I’ve got a new nickname for him Mr Pinocchio 🤥
Hi Jason, If all those bottles of wine had been forced down Jimi’s throat they would have caused some bruising and internal damage but Dr. Teare found no signs of violence. Tin foil hatters change the story when it suits them because it’s all coming from their imaginations.
Hi Ivana,
Great name for Doyle which suits him well. Speaking of breaks, still no sign of Mark Hess. Perhaps he’s in negotiations for his blockbuster “Jimi Hendrix Murder Documentary” written and directed by the “world’s greatest expert and foremost Hendrix authority” the tin foil hatter himself, Brian Doyle. 🤣
Hi Jason, I get the feeling Mark Hess has been shown the door many times, and it’s been locked after he has left with the sign don’t come back. The same goes for Mr. Pinocchio. They are both looking for backing but it’s just not happening and I think it has a lot to do with their reputations. 😜
And the nonsense they promote is totally absurd.
Read an article from 2018 by Harry Shapiro and sadly he was promoting Tappy Wright’s “murder lies”. He also included Fraud Bannister’s imaginary wine claims as well. But then Shapiro included the official record as well, so it appears he wants to have it both ways just to gain more readers. Nobody is going to read an article about Jimi dying from a drug overdose, but if you spice it up with a fictional tale people will want to read it. Since this is coming from an established Hendrix author, people are more inclined to believe this nonsense which keeps these bogus conspiracies alive.
Jimi’s death seems to be turning into what do you think happened to Jimi and what do you believe caused his death rather than what actually caused his death. I dislike these wishy washy types of biographers who sit on the fence and don’t really take a stand. Shapiro wants to include other people’s perspectives but he is just adding to the lies. What can’t be disputed is that Jimi died of a massive overdose regardless of what anyone says or believes.
Jimi was probably embarrassed because of her behavior infront of all his friends. She was causing a scene and it seems like he felt like he had to leave the party early in order to get her to stop causing a ruckus.
Since Monika was showing herself to be unhinged and unstable, maybe Jimi didn’t want to set her off even more and wanted to get rid of her later. He didn’t want her at the party so I’m pretty sure that was the case.
He could have taken his guitar and split earlier, but since he was at the party he probably didn’t trust her to have his guitar at the Samarkand, so he left with her to retrieve it. And that was a terrible mistake.
Monika probably then offered Jimi her pills once they got back to the Samarkand and he took a few of them not knowing the strength. Since they were so potent, Jimi passed out on the bed still fully clothed. If he planned on sleeping with Monika he would have been undressed and under the covers.
I wonder why Jimi left with Monika after she was verbally abusive towards him. She obviously felt humiliated after Jimi showed interest in the other girls at Harvey’s place but if Jimi was just looking for a ride to Kameron’s party then he could have caught a taxi there. His guitar could have been forwarded to the Cumberland Hotel. Jimi should have ended his association with Monika then and there.
“Our friend’ said Monika was giving clues to Glebbek in 1975 about “Jimi’s murder”.
He says “Monika said Jimi was poisoned” which really means “alcohol poisoning”.
He then said “Monika said Jimi was killed by the mafia” which means “Jeffery’s goons did it”.
So this clown has always asserted that “Jeffery murdered Hendrix”. Now he is changing his story to “Jeffery’s goons” doing it.
No evidence of “alcohol poisoning” in Jimi’s body during the autopsy but he claims “alcohol poisoning” anyway.
He then goes on to say the reason why the “alcohol poisoning” was never revealed is because Teare and Thurston purposely “covered it up” and didn’t document it.
Never ending conspiracies with these tin foil hatters.
Hi Jason, “Our friend” is full of contradictions. At first he was pushing Tappy Wright’s dumb story of murder by waterboarding now he’s backing Monika’s story of the Mafia poisoning Jimi. He has changed the story yet again by including a third party into the mix-“Jeffrey’s goons”. Teare and Thurston would never have covered up an alcohol poisoning in favour of an overdose of barbiturates. That’s just too ridiculous. I wonder if these tin foil hatters ever question the validity of the stupid stories they’re pushing. I think not. They are just as gullible as the people who fall for their stories/fantasies. 🤥
Hi Ivana,
“Our friend” bounces from one conspiracy to the next when it suits his narrative.
The majority of his phony claims comes from Monika’s stories which are in complete contradiction.
He needed to come up with something for the absence of wine so he just says Teare and Thurston “covered it up”. That way he still can claim “wine” without having to prove it with evidence. What this clown doesn’t understand is that he can’t prove there was a “cover up” since he has no evidence of that ever happening.
He originally claimed Jeffery and Monika participated in the “waterboarding” now he says “Jeffery’s goons” were the “murderers”. A decade ago on another website he said it was random “London thugs”. And on another he had intelligence agents and Black Panthers pouring wine. Funny how he abandoned Tappy Wright’s fake story when we called him out on it. 🤣
No sign of his “special witness” yet. 🤣
We’ll be waiting a long time for this special witness. It’s pretty obvious this is all coming from our friend’s imagination because his stories keep changing and he never has answers to where he gets his information from. He covers this up by saying people told him things off camera just to make his fake claims look legitimate. 😜
Gotta love those off camera claims.😃
Also, the “private phone conversation” with Kathy where “our friend” said she withheld crucial information to Jimi’s case.
Or the several medical experts who privately told him he is a “medical forensic genius”.🤣
I’ve noticed “our friend” is fond of taking photos of himself alongside so called “celebrities” like Leon Hendrix, but it’s always him taking the shots never the other way round or he seeks out people who had the remotest connection to Jimi to back his claims of murder. These people seem like they wouldn’t know what day it was let alone something that supposedly happened decades ago. I know I’ve said it before but “our friend” is a legend in his own lunchbox. 😂
Congratulations to Ukraine for winning the Eurovision. 🇺🇦 👏
Hi Ivana,
“Our friend” is a hangers on with old Jimi Hendrix acquaintances and Leon hoping to look important in the Hendrix community so he can push his hoax. These people are clueless just as Doyle is. None of these people he seeks out were with Jimi in London. They made up fake stories for publicity decades later. He just wants to have the appearance of being “friends” with these people.
Hi Jason, “Our friend” seems to have a lot of imaginary friends. 😂
And an imaginary “special witness”. 🤣🤣🤣
If he made a documentary he’d be playing all the parts himself. LOL
Haha….his Monika scenes would be hilarious! 🤣🤣🤣
Saw an ad for the new Elvis movie starring Tom Hanks. I wonder if they’ll include all that conspiracy theory rubbish about Elvis.
Been reading Roger Daltery’s account of when he last saw Jimi Hendrix before his death. Jimi and Devon Wilson visited Roger and his fiancé Heather at his home in East Sussex where he spent the night and then left for London in a cab with Devon the next morning. Heather noticed that Jimi’s speech was becoming slurred and thought it might have been due to barbiturates but apparently Jimi recovered the next morning after a bit of a rest. Interesting story retold decades later.
Very interesting story.
Hi Jason, I wonder how accurate this story actually is. Jimi noticed Devon walking along a London street while being driven around in Monika’s car when he got out and was invited to Kameron’s party by Devon. I’m assuming this was on the 17th of September. Before Jimi caught up with Monika he was with Kirsten Nefer at the Cumberland Hotel unless Devon arrived in London a good while earlier and he spent time with her. According to Mitch, Jimi was not at all pleased that Devon was in London as he was trying to distance himself from her. It just seems a short amount of time for all of this to be going on.
Brian Doyle has a new pseudonym “Sky High”.😂
Hi Ivana,
A lot of those stories you have to take with a grain of salt since some are not accurate. Jimi did see Kathy that afternoon so maybe he could have seen Devon too but I don’t think he would see them both in one afternoon. There’s also stories that Douglas invited Jimi to Kameron’s party. There’s been a couple accounts of Jimi not being happy that Devon was around. Nefer left before Monika arrived and then Monika wanted to claim they were “engaged”.
Sky High”? 🤣
Is he posting more phony Hendrix “murder” plots with that name? Lol.
Hi Jason, Came across another thread where “our friend” was recently posting that rubbish about the wine using his new pseudonym. This thread seems to be run by the same people who were posting on Crosstown Torrents. Doyle seems to have a particular dislike for Purple Jim because he posts the truth and discredits Doyle’s lies about the way Jimi died.
Hi Velvet Rocketeers, I’m back!
That forum (Steve Hoffman Forums) isn’t run by the same people as Crosstown Torrents, but many old members are members, including yours truly. The interventions of Sky High were duly erased by the administrators because the usual name-calling and insults came along as usual when he saw that everyone scoffed at this nonsense.
Apart from spreading lies if you’re rude you’ll be thrown off any thread. Some people never learn.
I’m not here to spead lies, you should know that from reading my page about Jimi’s death. However, the last time I was here, presenting my findings, I got called “tin foil hat” researcher, when I hadn’t called you two names. So if you can chill a little, everyhing will go fine.
…and by the way, I spend my time destroying the infantile Hendrix conspiracy/murder theories.
We should get along just fine then. ✌️
Sure thing!
One thing I wanted to ask, are you two administrators of this site/page? I’d like to request that my name be removed (posted by the insane Mr. Buster).
Can’t help you with this one.
During that forum discussion, I pointed out something to “Sky High” that completely effaces the whole wine story and the murder in one go.
When I mentioned to him that neither Dr. Seifert nor Dr. Teare mentioned any trace of wine inside Jimi, his reply has always been that Bannister had already pumped it all out!
The problem with his ridiculous argument is that Bannister himself said, and I quote “The medical staff used an 18 inch metal sucker to try and clear Hendrix’s airway…but it would just fill up with red wine from his stomach”.
Now, we know that a half-digested meal (chyme – a pasty fluid) was found in Jimi’s stomach at the autopsy, so if all the wine had been pumped out, any remaining food goo would have been suctioned out with it – especially if it has been soaking there for 6 hours (which it hadn’t anyway). What does the conspiracy theorist think? That Bannister re-inserted food goo into the stomach and vomit into the lungs (which he also watched being suctioned). Of course Shy High didn’t have an answer to that because it destroys the “wine in Jimi’s lungs” nonsense.
Going over old territory here except for the re-inserted food good. Would be medically impossible as well as malpractice.
Exactly, the presence of the goo/vomit in the stomach and lungs proves that Bannister’s story about the suctioning out of red wine has nothing to do with the case of Hendrix.
Coming back to what Jason said earlier about Dr. Brown’s statements:
“Also, no documentation of these phony procedures exist on Jimi’s medical record which proves nothing was done just like Dr. Brown stated on more than one occasion. All you have to do is listen to the official statement from St. Mary Abbotts hospital on 9/18/70 where they announced to the media that Jimi Hendrix was dead on arrival from an overdose of drugs.”
I don’t understand why you talk about “phoney proceedures”.
Yes, Jimi was D.O.A. but it must be remembered that he passed away in the ambulance. As you can see on my site, there are multiple confirmations of this: the police and the hospital infomed the press of this. The Admissions Officer said that he heard the two doctors who examined Jimi in the ambulance (triage) say that he died in the ambulance, Ambulanceman John Suau told researcher Dennis Care that Jimi passed away on arrival. This was also confirmed at the inquest. So there is no question.
So you can forget the conspiracy theorist nonsense about him being dead for hours at The Samarkand Hotel.
What Dr. Brown said fits with this fact. He noted that Jimi was brought in dead and as he walked alongside the trolley (for a matter of seconds) and this was true. However, he had the impression that Jimi had been dead for hours (he had in fact been in a coma for hours, which would explain his dire appearance). Brown also informs us that Jimi was being rushed to “the Emergency Room”. Dr. Seifert said that he was called to “the resus room”. So there was obviously a sense of urgency. Hospitals simply don’t rush 6 hour old dead bodies in to Resuscitation Rooms! The Keystone Doctors?
This is yet another stumbling block for the infantile conspiracy theorists.
Dr. Seifert went further of course, saying “We must have thought that at the time that there was a possibility that we could try and resuscitate him.” (BBC “Wink Of An Eye” Radio documentary)…and “We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead.” (interview with researcher/film-maker David Kramer).
Of course what Dr. Seifert means is that for them, Jimi was possibly only “clinically dead” at that moment (i.e. no breathing, no pulse, cold,…) and not yet “brain dead” (irrecuperable). All this fits with the fact that Jimi had only just stopped breathing and had no pulse.
Of course if Jimi had been dead for 6 hours, his body would have displayed livor mortis and rigor mortis (which are normally visible after about 1 hour of death) and the triage phase (the two doctors who examined him in the ambulance) wouldn’t have sent him into the Emergency/Resuscitation Room.
We’ve covered all these things in previous posts.
But they evidently need to be covered again to set the record straight.
I appreciate that but there is nothing new to tell all these things have been said before.
How about this from Beth Riley about the meeting with Philip Harvey:
“…when Philip and I were in the car, and I’d elbowed him, “ look who’s here..”—- Philip immediately looked around me and around Hendrix, and started talking IMMEDIATELY to/with MONIKA. Philip said stuff like, “Oh. Don’t worry about it! It was a long time ago!” And words to that effect. All I could recall from Monika shouting across and around Hendrix and myself, TO Philip— endless “apologies” for whatever had happened years prior.”
Nothing to do with Jimi’s passing of course. Merely a detail that Harvey didn’t mention for some reason.
Never mentioned before in earlier accounts of the encounter with Harvey by Monika and Jimi as they were driving along. Monika thought Jimi knew these people and Jimi thought Monika knew these people so I think it’s fair to assume that the story may not be true.
When I post messages here, they don’t come up. Are they vetted before publication?
That one worked, so here goes again:
More from Beth Riley on FB:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Fg3hA44HRF1vhcXimP4385xwnYwdS5o8/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=100956330367024978595&rtpof=true&sd=true
How interesting she comes out with this decades later. Don’t believe a word of it.
Just read an uplifting story of a man who works in a very remote part of Australia who keeps himself company by listening to the music of Jimi Hendrix and Stevie Ray Vaughan. 😀
Good taste in the outback.
Nice to hear Paul McCartney mention Jimi in his Glastonbury performance. Paul recommended that Jimi perform at the Monterey Pop Festival in 1967. 😀
Doyle is at the Hoffman forum?
Hi Jason, Apparently, using his new pseudonym “Sky High”. He was shown the door pretty quickly.
HendrixGuide now admits Jimi was declared dead on arrival, which means the doctors would not do any life saving procedures since he was officially declared dead when he reached the hospital.
John Saua and Reginald Jones both said Jimi was already dead at the Samarkand. And so did Officer Smith.
Reginald Jones told Kathy that the police did not want to fill out a long police report on a dead John Doe drug overdose so the police told Saua and Jones to take Jimi to the hospital as “an emergency” even though he was already dead.
So as protocol states, Jimi was treated as an “emergency” even though he was dead. So he was rushed inside the hospital and once the doctors could see there was no pulse Siefert pounded Jimi’s chest as a formality.
No procedure were done on Jimi to “save his life”.
Dr. Brown on more than one occasion said Jimi was already dead for hours and even Bannister admitted it.
Siefert gave three different versions.
St. Mary Abbotts Hospital on 9/18/70 never said Jimi had “life saving procedures” in their press conference.
Les Perrin, Jimi’s press agent never said he had “life saving procedures” either. He stated Jimi was dead on arrival.
All of these false claims about Jimi still being alive came decade later and one obscure newspaper printed an erroneous claim that Jimi died in an ambulance.
Jimi’s body did have rigor mortis. His mouth was black from already being dead.
HENDRIXGUIDE understood that some things just aren’t possible, and bordering on fantasy.
Hi Ivana,
HendrixGuide says it’s an “infantile conspiracy” to state that Jimi died several hours earlier before he arrived at the hospital.
That’s false. It’s not a “conspiracy theory” and the documented evidence proves it.
First, it would be medically and scientifically impossible for Jimi to have died in the ambulance enroute to the hospital.
Jimi ate a rice meal at Kameron’s party in the 11 o’clock hour and finished it closer to midnight. By the time 11 hours passed when HendrixGuide claims Jimi died in the ambulance, there would have been no trace of the rice in Jimi’s stomach when Teare did the autopsy. The rice would have been fully digested 11 hours after he ate it.
The proof that Jimi died in the early morning hours is the medium amount of rice remnants found in his stomach at the autopsy. Jimi’s digestive system was no longer able to break down the rice due to him being dead. That’s how medical experts determine an approximate time of death, and it’s based on science and the human body, not a phony claim from somebody trying to get publicity.
Second, we have one of the top medical experts at the time Dr. Rufus Crompton who estimated Jimi’s death no later than 4:30 AM based on Teare’s documentation on Jimi’s autopsy record. That’s documented evidence in which he told Kathy Etchingham during her investigation.
Third, it takes a human body 5 hours to fully digest a meal. Jimi finished his meal near 12 AM and died no later than 4:30 AM according to Crompton. Jimi still had undigested rice in his stomach and that puts his death in the early morning hours before he had time to digest it.
If Jimi died 11 hours later like HendrixGuide claims, the rice meal would have been fully digested and Jimi’s stomach would have been completely empty of any food.
Jimi was not alive in the ambulance and no phony procedures were done. Jimi was dead on arrival and was dead for hours.
Once again, science and the human body defeats false claims.
Jason, you have it all wrong about the time of death and about the rice.
As you can read on my site, the police and the hospital told the press on the day Jimi died that he passed away in the ambulance. This was also stated at the inquest. So there is no question. Do you think they lied? They were mistaken? That’s as bad as conspiracy theory logic. As I repeat, this is why he was rushed into the emergency room for resuscitation. A 6 hour dead body would have gone directly to the morgue.
As for the rice thing, as I’ve said here before, digestion of rice is greatly slowed by drugs and alcohol. Don’t think that there was a whole chicken Chow Mein in Jimi’s stomach, there was chyme (almost fully broken down food) which was analysed under a microscope at the autopsy. On this sludge whole grains could be seen (so obviously there were very few left to be digested). A full breakdown of this with links to medical sources – on my site.
Hi Jason, The rice meal still left in Jimi’s body confirms that Jimi was dead and not alive when he reached the hospital. Jimi was a slim man and not of a heavy build so he would never have tolerated/survived the excessive amount of barbiturates in his system. Only in tin foil hatters minds is Jimi portrayed as some sort super human being. I remember reading something that Monika said about the amount of barbiturates Jimi took not being fatal and the reason he died was because he chocked to death which is ridiculous because the reason Jimi chocked to death was because of the amount of barbiturates he took.
Hi Ivana,
Even a person who has a heavy build wouldn’t be able to tolerate that excessive amount of barbiturates.
Monika was desperately trying to absolve herself from being implicated in Jimi’s death so she made up a story lying about the amount of Vesparax not being fatal. But she was also on the record correctly saying the pills were strong. And of course, Jimi’s autopsy proves the pills were indeed fatal.
The rice is what destroys the tin foil hatters phony claims of Jimi still being alive to get “phony procedures”. That’s what I used to tell Doyle about the rice destroying his hoax. I wonder if he finally caught on to what I was telling him. That’s probably why he went berserk before he was kicked out.
Doyle is not someone who lasts long on any thread. He uses different pseudonyms in order to disguise who he really is but he’s not duping anyone because he basically says the same things wherever he posts.
When he is caught in a lie, Doyle will change his fake stories, but his entire hoax is basically the same: A Hendrix “murder”, imaginary wine, and “phony procedures” at the hospital to save Jimi’s life.
Doyle’s “special witness” never did show up. 🤣
Must be in “witness protection”😂
Nice to hear that Carlos Santana recovered from his collapse on stage. I’ve seen Carlos in concert; his guitar playing is amazing. I’m not surprised Jimi was a fan. 😀
Hi Ivana,
I’m glad he recovered as well. We can’t lose Carlos. He underwent a medical procedure for his heart not too long ago, so glad it didn’t have anything to do with that. The venue at Pine Knob is outdoors, and it gets really humid in Michigan during the Summer, so if you don’t stay hydrated you can pass out.
Doyle’s “witness” is in hiding from the invented now 85 year old black panthers and mafia guys who were helping to administer the 5 bottles of imaginary wine. 🤣
Hi Jason, The murderous squad roaming around London looking for the Samarkand Hotel with those 5bottles of wine under their arms. What a joke!
Watched the movie “To Sir With Love” with Sidney Poitier and Lulu. What a strong voice Lulu had. Jimi appeared on her show and there are some photos of them together at an awards show in London. 😀
Hi Ivana,
The “world’s greatest Hendrix researcher” has increased it to 6 bottles now.🤣
Yes, Lulu had a great voice and was a friend of Jimi’s.
In the fall, a new Hendrix box set is going to be released which includes a DVD of some live performances.
In the information given about the new box set (before it was pulled) Disc 4 is a Blu-ray of audio tracks. Here is the tracklisting for it:
Disc 4:
Freedom, Valleys of Neptune, Ezy Ryder, Angel, Izabella, Lover Man, Night Bird Flying, My Friend, Dolly Dagger, Slow Pali Gap, Straight Ahead, Drifting, Beginnings, Stepping Stone, Hey Baby (New Rising Sun), Earth Blues, In From the Storm, Room Full of Mirrors, Astro Man, Belly Button Window
Looking forward to box set. 😀
The ambulance officers found vomit on Jimi back at the Samarkand Hotel. Vomiting occurs just before dying and Jimi vomited because he was dying. The excessive amount of barbiturates took care of the rest. Jimi took the Vesparax early in the morning, and the ambulance was called at around 11 in the morning so I think it’s fair to say that Jimi died soon after taking the barbiturates. The ambulance officers weren’t allowed to pronounce him dead this was done when Jimi arrived at the hospital by the doctors after he was taken into casualty as a formality in order to determine time of death needed to complete the paperwork. This rubbish about Jimi being alive after hours of taking an excessive amount of barbiturates is pure fantasy.
No Ivana, there are many points to reconsider there.
We know that Jimi took the Black Bomber at the party (which he left at around 3 a.m. according to Angie Burdon, and it wasn’t a fatal dose or anything.
After that, we have no idea when Jimi took the Vesparax pills OR exactly how many he took! We only have Monika’s muddled accounts. It was the combination of the two drugs that caused Jimi’s death and even 4 pills would have been enough to put him in a very dangerous situation (the coma that he was in when the ambulance arrived).
Unfortunately, we can’t count on the ambulance men’s account that is in all the books because the interview were orchestrated by the fraud Delores Cullen (a.k.a. Diana Bonham-Carter, a.k.a. Dee Mitchell). She was a dangerous stalking confidence trickster (as recounted in Kathy’s book).
Rmember that one of the ambulance men told investigator Dennis Care that Jimi was still live at the hotal and that he passed away on arrival. This was confirmed by the Admissions Officer who overheard the two doctors (who looked at Jimi in the ambulance) say that.
As I said earlier, the police, the hospital and the inquest into Jimi’s death ALL confirmed that Jimi passed away in the ambulance. So unless one thinks that they were mistaken or were lying under pressure from some authority (CT nonsense of couse) than THAT was exactly Jimi’s condition at the time.
Logic dictates that that was the case because Jimi was rushed to the Emergency Room (something that simply wouldn’t be considered for a 6-hour old blue, stiff body).
So you can forget the fantasy that Jimi was ded for hours at the Samarkand Hotel.
I’m convinced that the medical procedures would have been different if Jimi was alive. The officers would have tried to rouse him, taken his blood pressure and used an oxygen mask or felt for a pulse. Instead they used suctioning equipment but even that was difficult because of all the dried and hard stuff. It would be interesting to know if the siren was on or off on the way to hospital because both ambulance officers said Jimi was dead at the hotel. They probably said Jimi died in the ambulance because they didn’t know the exact time of death this was revealed later but even then it was an appropriate estimate.
Ivana, Ambulance man Reginald Jones told Etchingham/Mitchell that they sped of with “full lights and sirens”, so evidently there was a sense of urgency.
As for the medical proceedures of the time, this was 1970, not 1910. The medical practice and rigueur of triage had been in place in the medical world since the first World war. Common sense really. You couldn’t leave it up to ambulance men to wheel in dead bodies all day and night, without the assessment of the condition of the arrivals.
Admission Officer Walter Price said that when the ambulance arrived, one of the men got out and ran in to summon a doctor – two came out, looked at Jimi and decided that he be rushed to the Emergency Room of the Casualty ward. Ambulance man John Suau told investigator Dennis Care that Jimi died on arrival, in the ambulance and he told the two doctors this. Price added that he overheard the two doctors say that Jimi died…in the ambulance.
The press on the scene that day were told by the police and the hospital either that Jimi passed away in the ambulance and/or that he died after being taken in for resuscitation.
The inquest (a few weeks later) was also informed that Jimi passed away in the ambulance. So there is obviously no question of Jimi having lain dead at the flat for hours on end. All that nonsense came about because a confusion between the rapid clean-up by Terry Slater (sent by Eric Burdon) before the ambulance arrived and the later clean-up which was in the afternoon, just before the police turned up at the flat to interview Monika.
Interesting how this story has changed over the years. At first Jimi had been dead for some time with the all physical indicators and then he died at the back of the ambulance at the hospital. The doctors said there was nothing they could do. I remember reading that there was some criticism about the way Jimi was handled medically and maybe this is what the ambulance officers story is all about. These professionals would have known exactly what to do and what needed to be done.
Oh dear….Doyle is back, somewhere there is a village short of an idiot
As I said earlier, the ambulance men’s accounts (gathered by Etchingham/Mitchell) are tarnished by the fact that “Dee” was nuts. She had been given a mission by Kathy to set out to prove that Monika hadn’t done enough to save Jimi (it was Noel Redding who had asked Kathy for help because Monika was about to sue him for saying that didn’t do enough). Also, Monika was accusing the ambulance men of sitting Jimi up in the ambulance. If Dee made the guys aware of this, they would have been all too eager to say that Jimi was already gone at the flat, in order to shift responsibility from themselves. However, conflicting things are in the interviews. Jimi was “unconscious”, they travelled with “lights and sirens” etc. They did say that they put Jimi in a special chair in order to lift him up the stairs from the basement flat and I suspect that they left him in that during the transportation. They wouldn’t admit this of course and made no mention of it when there was an investigation. Dennis Care found out that there was a rumour going round the hospital that they had sat Jimi up.
It was around the same time as the Etchingham/Mitchell interviews (early 90s) that John Suau told Care that Jimi was alive at the flat and that he gave his last breath on arrival at the hospital (see my comments above).
Note also that when Kathy presented her big dossier for a fresh investigation, Scotland Yard found that it didn’t stand up and that “..some of the witness they saw had embellished what actually happened, possibly because it was what Etchingham and Bonham-Carter [Mitchell] wanted to hear…”. They also mentioned that Dr. Crompton didn’t understand Bannister’s opinions.
It all come down to science and the human body.
If Jimi died hours later in the ambulance with the scenario HendrixGuide is trying to claim, then no rice would have been found in Jimi’s stomach. 11 hours later the rice would have been fully digested.
Dr. Rufus Crompton one of the best medical experts at the time, concluded that Jimi died no later than 4:30 am due to the medium sized rice meal found in Jimi’s stomach. The fact that Jimi was dead is the reason his digestive system was unable to break down the food. That’s why there was rice still left in Jimi’s stomach, he died before he was able to fully digest the rice proving he died in the early morning hours. If it was hours later in the ambulance, all the rice would have been gone.
Ginger Baker confirmed Jimi died hours earlier and so did Dr. Bob Brown.
HendrixGuide still doesn’t understand why the “lights and sirens” were on.
The police told Jones and Saua to take Jimi’s body to the hospital as an “emergency” because they didn’t want to have to fill out a police report on a dead John Doe OD. So as protocol, the ambulance men had to treat Jimi as an “emergency” even though he was dead. The doctors at the hospital had to do the same since Jimi was brought through the emergency doors. Dr. Siefert just went through the motions to declare Jimi dead because Jimi was already dead for a long time.
Dr. Bob Brown said Jimi was already dead and was dead for “many hours” when he was brought in and there was “nothing he could do for him”.
Dr. Bob Brown was there….HendrixGuide was not. I trust what a former doctor witnessed over what someone is trying to claim who was never there to see Hendrix’s body in the condition it was.
And I’ll believe the expertise of a renowned pathologist to determine Jimi’s estimated time of death over anybody else.
Once again, it’s science and the human body that debunks conspiracy theories and absurd claims.
Hi Jason, I can’t believe we’re still debating this. We’ve talked about the rice and what Dr. Crompton said about the state Jimi was in but some of us are choosing to stick with the fairytales.
Jason, the fact that it was confirmed by the police, the hospital and at the inquest that Jimi passed away in the ambulance completely rules out any possibility that Jimi died hours earlier. We know for certain that Jimi was still alive when the ambulance took him away. So one has to work back from that.
You seem to imagine that a Chicken Chow Mein was intact in Jimi’s stomach (and with the same logic, vomited all over himself too). The substance that Prof. Teare found was a paste (chyme) in which whole rice grains “could be discerned” – so a few grains still not quite broken down. He looked at the chyme through microscope to determine what it was composed of.
Digestion doesn’t happen in the stomach, it happens in the intestines. The breaking down of foods in the stomach is greatly slowed down by the consumption of alcohol, barbiturates, amphetamines, cannabis and sleep. Jimi had indulged in ALL of these that night. The food he had eaten was almost completely broken down when he was found (alive) with only a few grains of rice not yet broken down (“could be discerned”). So you can forget the rice argument.
The young and inexperienced Dr. Brown had the impression that Jimi had been dead for some time but he did say that all he did was walk alongside the trolley as it was being taken to the Emergency Room (so not a long dead body obviously). He also said that Jimi wasn’t his patient at the time. Dr. Seifert confirmed that there was still life in Jimi – meaning that he wasn’t yet brain dead. Again, only patients that are within the tiny window of being resuscitated are taken to Resuscitation Rooms – never long-dead stiffs. If there is a fantasy going on here it’s with those that think that Jimi had been dead for hours. Inquest, police and the hospital spokesperson to the press on September 18th 1970: Jimi passed away in the ambulance. Everything else fits around that inescapable fact.
Hi Ivana,
HendrixGuide is just like Brian Doyle, who attempts to discredit Dr. Bob Brown as “young and inexperienced” to fit his phony narrative.
These conspiracy theorists always attack the medical experts who discredit their phony theories. After they discredit them, they tell us “how it really happened” when they were never there or have any documented proof for their fairy tale. It’s all the same con game for their hoax.
Dr. Bob Brown was a doctor and could tell when a man is dead. Even someone not in the medical field could determine that as well. So, the “young and inexperienced” claim is a joke. Even Fraud Bannisrer admitted Jimi was stiff with rigor mortis and had black mucous membranes which is a result of being dead for a long period of time.
HendrixGuide’s fairy tale of Jimi dying in the ambulance is absurd. Nobody confirmed that except an erroneous report that appeared in an article from an obcure newspaper. St. Mary Abbott’s Hospital confirmed Jimi was “dead on arrival”. They never said he died in an ambulance or had “phony procedures” to save his life”. Every legitimate news report from 1970 confirmed Jimi was died at the Samarkand.
Food doesn’t still remain in your stomach 11 hours later even under drug consumption. That’s absurd.
According to HendrixGuide, Jimi died in the ambulance, which means Jimi’s heavy drug consumption happened hours later. The rice still would have been digested by that time. So, his fairy tale is debunked again.
HendrixGuide is still clueless about why Jimi was taken to the resuscitation room. It was standard hospital protocol since Jimi was brought in as an “emergency” even though he was long dead. Siefert pounded Jimi’s heart twice and declared him dead. Even the cop Ian Smith said Jimi was dead at the Samarkand.
All 3 doctors confirmed at one point that Jimi was dead for hours. Siefert changed his story for a propaganda documentary. Siefert did nothing for Jimi because he was dead.
HendrixGuide wants us to forget about the rice because it destroys his conspiracy theory.
The rice proves Jimi died in the early morning hours. A top medical expert, Dr. Rufus Crompton, confirmed Jimi died no later than 4 am after he viewed Jimi’s official autopsy report. Those are the facts that debunks the “death in the ambulance” nonsense.
Hi Jason, Just the fact that Dr. Brown said he was walking along the trolley and not running tells me there was no urgency there because like he said there was nothing they could do for Jimi. It takes years to become a doctor so that rubbish about Dr. Brown being inexperienced is just silly. He would have been able to see first hand that Jimi was dead.
Hi Ivana,
The “inexperienced” claim is another attempt to discredit medical professionals in order to push a phony conspiracy theory.
Brian Doyle said the same thing about Dr. Brown in order to push his fake “phony procedures” conspiracy theory.
Dr. Brown was a doctor and was able to distinguish between a dead body and from a person who is still alive. Even a person not in the medical field could determine a person that’s been dead for a long time.
Dr. Brown said several times over the last decade in interviews that Jimi was dead “for many hours” when he was brought in and “nothing could be done for him”. I’ve posted almost every interview Dr. Brown gave.
And like you said, the fact that he was walking shows it wasn’t an emergency and everything was done for protocol including Siefert going through the motions to establish Jimi’s death.
Funny how all these conspiracy theorists try to discredit the doctors and then give their own phony version of events that never happened. They are all the same.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says:
Jason, the fact that it was confirmed by the police, the hospital and at the inquest that Jimi passed away in the ambulance completely rules out any possibility that Jimi died hours earlier.
Jason says:
Totally false. The police and the hospital never confirmed Jimi died in an ambulance. That’s a bogus claim.
St. Mary Abbott’s Hospital confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival. Officer Ian Smith confimed Jimi was already dead at the Samarkand. Every news outlet confirmed Jimi died at the Samarkand.
London Times 9/19/70:
Jimi Hendrix, the American pop singer and guitarist, died in London yesterday. He had been taken by ambulance from a flat in a private hotel in Notting Hill but was dead on arrival at St Mary Abbot’s Hospital, Kensington.
The cause of death was most probably an overdose of drugs, said Scotland Yard, but a post mortem examination would be carried out today.
The flat where he was found was at the Hotel Samarkand and was booked in the name of Miss Marika Dannenman.
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 says:
The young and inexperienced Dr. Brown had the impression that Jimi had been dead for some time but he did say that all he did was walk alongside the trolley as it was being taken to the Emergency Room (so not a long dead body obviously).
“Jimi Hendrix was dead a many good hours before he was brought in to the hospital. Unfortunately, there was nothing I could for him as he aspirated vomitus from a barbiturate overdose. It wasn’t as if there was something to be done about Hendrix. There simply wasn’t…any medical remedy” – Dr. Bob Brown
Hi Jason, I looked up the definition of dead on arrival it just means that Jimi died before getting to a hospital or emergency room.
HI Ivana,
That is true. Dead on arrival means the person is dead when they reach the hospital or inside the emergency room. In Jimi’s case he was dead at the Samarkand, so of course he would still be dead when he reached the hospital. I’ve made this same point to internet hoaxer Brian Doyle and now HendrixGuide who also wants to pretend Jimi was “still alive” to have phony procedures.
Ivana, yes, you are correct because Jimi passed away in the ambulance, so – DOA.
As you know, that means that a person still has a chance of being resuscitated. Someone who has been dead for hours has flat zero chance, so the bodies arent admitted to Casualty wards – that would be a fantasist, ludicrous notion (which you and Jason entertain for some strange reason).
Jason says “The police and the hospital never confirmed Jimi died in an ambulance. That’s a bogus claim.” – That is false because firstly the press were told that, and I quote:
“The police sources said [Hendrix] was admitted to St. Mary Abbott’s Hospital at 11:45 and died about one hour afterward….A hospital spokesman said first Hendrix was dead on arrival but doctors who examined him later said he lived for about one hour after admission.” – UPI press telex September 18th 1970
“A spokesman for the hospital said the 27 year old guitarist was alive when admitted but died shortly [after] noon”. – Peter Goddard (journalist)
“Doctors…fought to save his life but all attempts to resuscitate him failed” – Evening Standard (18th September 1970)
“Pop star Jimi Hendrix died in an ambulance yesterday on the way to the hospital” – David Tune (The Daily Mail)
Secondly, this was confirmed at the inquest by the authorities:
“The inquest in Hendrix’s death was told that he died on the way to hospital, after being picked up by an ambulance at this building.” – British TV Reporter standing outside The Samarkand Hotel after the inquest (there is a video of this on the dedicated page of my website (The Jimi Hendrix Record Guide > Epilogue > Jimi’s death…).
So, do you think the police and the hospital and the inquest got it all wrong? – Simply because you back the account of Dr. Brown (who evidently was mistaken)?
Explain.
This does not suggest that Jimi passed away in the ambulance it means he was dead already when he got to the hospital. Jimi’s death could have occurred earlier according to this definition what it doesn’t do is try to establish an exact time of death. I have never heard that ridiculous account of Jimi dying an hour after being admitted to hospital this is obviously a fabrication and a deliberate distortion of what really happened.
Ivana, I agree that the thing about Jimi being alive for an hour after admission is incorrect (even though the pres HAD been told that on the day) but not a “fabication”. It was actually said by a hospital spokesperson to the press.
It seems that that arose because of some confusion while Dr. Seifert was working on Jimi. Alvenia Bridges did say that at one point a nurse came out to tell her and Monika that Jimi was responding and all would be OK. Seifert however denies this but in the interview by David Kramer he did say “”To say that he [Jimi] was dead when they [Reginald Jones and John Suau] got to the [Samarkand] hotel is probably incorrect. When they brought Jimi into the hospital there was still some life left in him which is why we worked so hard on him. We wouldn’t have worked so hard trying to resuscitate him if he was already dead. There was some breathing going on. Whether you call that life or not is another story. I worked on him for about ten minutes, and when I couldn’t get him to breath…”
So perhaps (unknown to Seifert) a nurse witnessed the signs that there was some hope and went out to calm the hysterical Monika and it was this that gave rise to the “an hour” thing.
However, if the inquest was told that Jimi passed away in the ambulance, the hospital and the police confirmed that on the day Jimi died – which fits the logic of the rushing to the Resuscitation Room – then this reveals that Dr. Brown was incorrect in his 10 second assessment that Jimi had been dead for some time (Seifert said the opposite).
All this proves is that there wasn’t a clean-up at the Samarkand while Jimi lay dead.
As I said before, Terry Slater (joining Monika) quickly buried drugs before the ambulance arrived. The bigger clean-up (with Barrett, Stickells etc. was in the afternoon before the police arrived to interview Monika and check the flat out).
They found nothing suspicious that would point to foul play of course (that is in the mind of the conspiracy loons).
HENDRIXGUIDE8721 is just like Brian Doyle. He ignores the facts and pushes his debunked conspiracy theories instead.
St. Mary Abbott’s Hospital confirmed Jimi was dead on arrival during their media press conference to the entire world. They never once stated that Jimi “lived for an hour” when he was admitted. Dr. Bob Brown was the spokesman during the press conference and he stated “Jimi was already dead”.
Tabloid newspapers are not authentic sources.
Here is what an authentic sources said about Jimi Hendrix:
“Jimi Hendrix was dead a many good hours before he was brought in to the hospital. Unfortunately, there was nothing I could do for him as he aspirated vomitus from a barbiturate overdose. It wasn’t as if there was something to be done about Hendrix. There simply wasn’t…any medical remedy” – Dr. Bob Brown
Jimi’s Press agent confirmed the same and never said he “lived for an hour after”. Dead on arrival means the person is already dead.
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival”. – Les Perrin
“Certified to be dead on arrival” means the hospital confirmed Jimi already to be dead.
Les Perrin said “Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to the hospital” meaning Jimi was already dead at the Samarkand just like I said. That was a media confirmation on 9/18/70 by Jimi’s own press agent. So, HendrixGuide’s ambulance death fantasy has been easily debunked..
“He was cold and he was blue. He had all the parameters of someone who had been dead for some time.” – Dr. Bannister
“On admission he was obviously dead. He had no pulse, no heartbeat, and the attempt to resuscitate him was merely a formality.” – Dr. Bannister
“He was put on a monitor, but it was flat. I pounded his heart a couple oftimes, but there was no point in doing anything else, as he was dead.” – Dr. Siefert
“Jimi Hendrix was dead a many good hours before he was brought in to the hospital.” -Dr. Brown
ALL 3 doctors have confirmed Jimi was dead for a long time before he was brought in to the hospital. Jimi’s press agent confirmed it as well. That debunks the ambulance death fantasy.
Christ Jason, like that deluded conspiracy guy, you quote fraud Bannister now? Jeez, you’re desperate (laughter). Do you also think that Jimi was over 7 feet tall like that idiot?
You also hang on to the Dr. Brown, the onethe least involved, when his superior (Dr. Seifert) said the opposite! Hilarious. The inquest (after consulting the police AND the hospital officials) confirmed that Jimi passed away IN THE AMBULANCE.
The press were told the same thing on September 18th.
You seriously need to get real and do more research – hey, it’s all done for you! Go to The Jimi Hendix Record Guide!
Goodbye tin foil hat amateurs! XD
To HendrixGuide:
So, you are running away from this discussion after you were debunked. That’s typical when a phony conspiracy gets destroyed by factual evidence.
Dr. Siefert told 3 different versions of what happened on September 18, 1970 and you pick his most absurd version to push for your phony narrative.
We can eliminate what every doctor has told us and just use the official confirmation of Jimi’s death as told by Jimi’s own press agent Les Perrin. Perrin’s job was to speak to the media to give an accurate account of his client’s death.
“Mr. Hendrix’s body was taken to St. Mary Abbots Hospital in Kensington, London, at 11:45 this morning, and he was certified to be dead on arrival”. – Les Perrin
Les Perrin explicitly stated “Mr. Hendrix’s BODY was taken to St. Mary Abbotts Hospital”. That tells you that Jimi was already dead at the Samarkand. Mr. Perrin did not say “Jimi died in an ambulance” or that he “lived for an hour” when he was brought in to the hospital. Jimi was dead at the Samarkand and was dead when he reached the hospital. The fact Perrin said “body” tells you Jimi was dead at the Samarkand just like I said.
Les Perrin also stated that Jimi was CERTIFIED to be dead on arrival. That means the hospital officially confirmed Jimi to be dead when he reached the hospital. That means no “phony procedures” ever happened. Jimi did not “die in an ambulance” and he did not “live for an hour” after he was brought in. That’s total nonsense and absurdity.
Hospital officials never confirmed “Jimi died in an ambulance”. There is no official statement by the hospital of that phony claim.
Monika claimed Jimi died in the hospital not in an ambulance.
St. Mary Abbotts never confirmed Jimi died in an ambulance.
All 3 doctors confirmed at one point that Jimi was already dead for many hours. That’s corroboration amongst all 3 doctors even though Bannister and Siefert lied changing their stories later on of what actually happened pretending to “work hard” on a dead body. That’s why both of them have zero credibility and you push Siefert’s phony claim for your false narrative.
You need to do more research because you are pushing fantasy theories just like Brian Doyle.
Hi Ivana,
Which thread is the photo in at Hoffman’s?
If Jimi had died in the ambulance then it’s obvious that the statements of the key personal would have been completely different at the time.
Hi Ivana,
Ok thanks, I’ll check it out.
One of Monika’s paintings paintings of Jimi is going up for auction. Wonder how much it will sell for.
Hi Jason, I’d like to know who put it up for auction was it a family member or Uli Jon Roth?
Saw a terrific photo of Jimi, Mitch and Noel as children over at Steve Hoffman Forum.
Hi Jason, It’s the Jimi Hendrix General Discussion Forum page 84. Someone commented before they were experienced.😀
Well, this is the time of year that conspiracy theorists, hoaxers, and opportunists come out to push fake stories about Jimi Hendrix’s death to gain publicity hoping to look important.
Conspiracy theorist Mark Hess has resurfaced with a new absurd theory just in time for the anniversary of Jimi’s tragic death. He posted some total nonsense on a music/conspiracy blog, but now the owner has set the site to private where only paying members can view the content. So, it’s beneficial to all Hendrix fans that the garbage Hess wrote won’t be able to be viewed by the public.
Hess first agreed with another infamous Hendrix conspiracy theorist that Monika “helped” Mike Jeffrey “murder” Jimi with bottles of wine and several pills. He also put out the nonsense that Monika was a “well trained secret agent” as the sole purpose of her goal was to lure Jimi to the Samarkand where he would meet his demise.
Hess then concocted even more absurdities as his fake story becomes even more laughable.
Hess went on to confirm the fake and debunked Tappy Wright story as “legitimate” and “the most important confession ever told in history”.
Hess repeated the debunked theory that Mike Jeffrey drunkenly admitted “murdering” Hendrix to Tappy Wright so he could get the $2 million in insurance money because Hendrix was going to fire him as his manager.
Conspiracy theorist Mark Hess then took this fake story to a new level. Hess said after Jeffrey realized he admitted his crimes to Wright, he began to panic because he was afraid people would start talking and he would be prosecuted for insurance fraud and murder. So, Hess claims Jeffrey faked his death by pretending he was on one of the planes that collided in mid air with another plane so he could live the rest of his life off Jimi’s money in The Bahamas with no threat of prosecution.
Hess stated that nobody ever witnessed Jeffrey’s body and his only identification was his jewelry that was most likely given back to Jeffrey. Hess claims Jeffrey’s MI6 buddies helped him abscond with the millions to live the rest of his life in paradise while still giving orders from afar threatening people to keep quiet about the “real details” of Jimi’s “murder”.
Hess also went on to repeat the fake story of internet hoaxer Brian Doyle, that Mike Jeffrey threatened both Dr. Thurston and Dr. Teare forcing them to omit any “belly full of wine” and to replace it with “stomach full of rice” in the autopsy report and during the inquest. Jeffrey also threatened all the doctors, nurses, and ambulance men to keep quiet as well. Jeffrey also kept his “goons” in place for decades to keep people quiet until this very day.
So, this weak looking club owner/manager wielded all this “power” making people live in fear for the rest of their lives according to these hoaxers.
What’s even worse about these asinine fake stories is that there are fools out there who believe this nonsense.
Hi Ivana,
Not sure who put it up for auction but just that one of the paintings will be auctioned off with other Hendrix items.
Well today is the 17th, always sad knowing this was Jimi’s last day on Earth in 1970.
Hi Jason, Sad time of year it’s already 18th September where I am. I’m not surprised conspiracy theorists have come out to play again peddling their rubbish. It’s the only time they get any attention.
R.I.P Jimi 27/11/1942-18/9/1970. 💐
Today on September 18, 1970 the world lost a rock superstar and now Jimi Hendrix has become a legend.
Normally the anniversary of Jimi’s death is mentioned in the media but this year it wasn’t even mentioned. Radio stations used to play a block of Hendrix music in his memory on this day but none was played. I heard “Fire” but the DJ never mentioned Jimi died on this day.
Also, under historical dates “on this day” it was always mentioned that Jimi Hendrix died on this day, but this year there was nothing. It was just skipped over when other less important events were listed for history.
Maybe too many years have passed, but it’s truly disgusting that there wasn’t even a mention of Jimi’s death anniversary.
I agree should have been mentioned. Jimi was such an important part of music history. I hope he’s never completely forgotten. Kathy must feel particularly sad on this day. At least Jimi was part of a question on The Chase when a contestant was asked who wrote Purple Haze?. So he is still thought of in some form 🎸
Other artists who have passed away still get recognition but one of the greatest guitar players who used to get mentioned wasn’t this year. Hopefully this won’t be a trend.
There’s a guy on YouTube named Corey Washington who is another Hendrix conspiracy theorist that made a conspiracy “murder” video. No surprise that Doyle showed up in the comments to peddle his usual b.s. under his “Exiles800” alias.
Hi Jason, Is this the same Corey Washington who wrote a biography about Jimi called Black Legacy? Ralph Yates wrote a review. I have a feeling this might be “our friend”.
Watched a documentary about Michael Jackson last night and it was like sitting through a horror movie. This talented young man spiralled into drug addiction and psychological problems with little support from the people around him who were supposed to take care of him.😢
Hi Ivana,
Yeah that is the same Corey Washington. He made a fake mini documentary of Jimi being “murdered”.
Ralph Yates is “our friend”. He mainly used that name on Amazon to write phony book reviews and to trash authors he doesn’t like.
Hi Jason, The master of disguise.🥸
Hi Ivana,
I call him the fraud of the net.
Interesting enough, he used his “flyswatter” alias to praise the Aleem Twins phony book along with his other famous aliases a few years ago. He’s now using “scrum drum” to post about Kennedy conspiracies.
That’s sad about Jackson with his drug abuse. Seemed like it started up after he caught on fire when he was doing the Pepsi commercial. And here he had a doctor who was killing him off with drugs when he should have been taking care of him and eventually did kill him.
Hi Jason, When he was posting on Crosstown Torrents as Scrum Drum, Flyswatter always
followed so it became obvious this was the same person. He did the same thing here thinking he wouldn’t be caught out. 😆
27/11/1942-18/9/1970. Jimi would have been 80.💐
Hi Jason, I hope you’re well. I’ve joined another thread it was getting a bit lonely on this one.😌
HI Ivana,
I am well and hope you are too.
Are there any hoaxers on the other thread?
Hi Jason, It’s more music oriented with very knowledgeable people on it. It was started by Purple Jim.
Sounds like a good place.
Hi Ivana,
I noticed “our friend” has been using his “scrum drum” alias to post conspiracy theories about Kennedy and political history. Guess he has given up posting Hendrix conspiracies for now. 🤣
Hi Jason, He might have run out of ideas. I feel sorry for President Kennedy who is not around to defend himself. “Our friend” knows how to pick his targets.🤪
Hi Jason, I informed Purple Jim about our efforts to discredit “our friend” over on the other thread and how he used the same tactics on us as he did on CTT. I was wondering about another poster who sounded like “our friend” but Purple Jim reassured me it wasn’t him.
Hi Jason, “our friend” is at it again over on the Jimi Hendrix Fan Club site on Facebook with a new pseudonym Gareth Ishmael. He stopped posting but not before being rude towards Purple Jim.
An interview with Bob Brown in a new biography about Jimi confirms that Jimi was long dead.
Hi Ivana,
“Our friend” has been busy on the net pushing his fake conspiracy theories lol.
How have you been?
Today would have been Jimi’s 81st birthday.
Hello Jason, Nice to hear from you. I really miss our posts on this thread. I’ve been over at Steve Hoffman for a year now. I even asked Purple Jim if he knew where you were. It doesn’t surprise me that “our friend” has been peddling his rubbish.