When I was still in school – either high school or an undergraduate in college, I can’t remember which and it doesn’t matter – my classmates and I watched a documentary on the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Although I remember nothing about the setting or the rest of the documentary, one segment of the film was forever imprinted on my mind and I still think of it often.
The segment came from a camera crew following a small contingent of Belgian U.N. soldiers peacekeepers overseeing a small camp at Dom Bosco School. When the killing in Rwanda started in earnest on April 7th, approximately 2,000 Tutsis fled to the school, believing that the Belgians would protect them from the Hutu militias rampaging through the countryside, massacring anyone even remotely suspected of being Tutsi or a moderate Hutu.
And then, suddenly, the Belgians were packing up and leaving. Pulling out. Why? Ten Belgian peacekeepers protecting the Prime Minister had been murdered (along with the Prime Minister) by Hutu extremists. This was enough for the government of Belgium and they pulled out of the UNAMIR peacekeeping mission (UNAMIR is an acronym for United Nations Assistance Mission For Rwanda).
The Tutsis were horrified.
One scene in particular stands out:
A woman in a business suit, flanked by other Tutsis is begging the Belgians not to abandon them. In the background Hutu thugs can be seen drinking beer and taunting the Tutsis, chanting “Hutu Power”, clashing their machetes together and even calling out to specific women they say they will rape and kill as soon as the Belgians are out of the way.
Seeing the determination of the Belgians to leave, the refugees make a remarkable request of them. They say, “If you have to leave, please, we ask you to be shot down by your machine gun.” Sooner a United Nations bullet than a machete… The Belgians ignore the request.
The refugees panic as the U.N. vehicles start to pull away, and they crowd around the last of the departing trucks, running in front of it to try and prevent the Belgians from leaving.
A girl is hanging on to a UNAMIR truck and asking the soldier, “Are you really abandoning us? We’ll all be killed. Why are you leaving?”
A Belgian soldier fires his rifle in the air to open a path for the vehicles (As the documentary later revealed, that was the first and only time the soldier fired his weapon in Rwanda).
And then, indeed, the last of the Belgians is gone – in a swirl of dust and diesel exhaust, abandoning the 2,000 Tutsis and condemning them to a horrible death.
Some time later – several hours or even a day – the camera crew returns to the scene. It is completely silent. Everyone is dead, including hundreds of children. The woman seen before in the business suit is plainly visible. She is still where she was, along with those that flanked her, when she was pleading with the Belgians. All of those around her were tortured before being killed. Many had their arms and legs cut off before being put out of their misery.
The women across the camp, young and old alike, had been gang raped before being murdered. And frequently the rapes included the use of objects such as sticks or weapons, as well as the cutting off of breasts or buttocks.
In other words, the Hutus behaved as fucking savages.
Perhaps needless to say, that seeming act of betrayal and indifference by the Belgians left a strong impression on me. And I always wondered how that event came about. Who made that decision? Who gave that order?
Now I know…
Homage To A Broken Man:
Lieutenant General Romeo Dallaire (Canadian) served as force commander of the United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda from July 1993 to September 1994. When Lt-Gen. Dallaire received the call to serve as force commander of the UN intervention in Rwanda in 1993, he thought he was heading off on a modest and straightforward peacekeeping mission. Thirteen months later he flew home from Africa, broken, disillusioned and suicidal, having witnessed the slaughter of 1,000,000 Rwandans in only a hundred days.
He was ignored, one could even say betrayed, by the United Nations (and the Western powers specifically) when he desperately warned them of the impending massacre of a million Hutus and Tutsis that he was supposed to protect with totally inadequate resources. This warning was dismissed and was soon followed by the eruption of the feared massacre of a million people.
It is now widely accepted that if Dallaire’s plea for reinforcements had been answered at that critical moment, hundreds of thousands of people might have lived. Later on, various individuals and groups, including the Belgian government, attempted to pin the blame on him personally for the deaths of the troops involved. He has since been completely exonerated, but was put through bureaucratic hell, to match the physical hell he had witnessed.
Lieutenant General Romeo Dallaire announced that he was taking early retirement, because he could not cope with his memories, the piles of bodies, and the rest — “hearing people die at the end of the phone because I could not send troops in to rescue them. There are many days in the past, less so now, when I wish I had died there too”. He has been tormented with a sense of personal guilt and horror ever since he returned from Rwanda, even reportedly attempting suicide.
In an effort to come to terms with what happened and to record for history his experiences, he wrote an eyewitness account of the Rwandan genocide, entitled Shake Hands With The Devil. I just finished reading the book and the following passage leapt out at me with the answers to the questions above that had been nagging me ever since I first saw that documentary so long ago:
The odor of death in the hot sun; the flies, maggots, rats and dogs that swarmed to feast on the dead. At times it seemed the smell had entered my skin. My Christian beliefs had been the moral framework that had guided me throughout my adult life. Where was God in all this horror? Where was God in the world’s response?
Two thousand Rwandans had lost their lives that day as a direct result of the Belgian withdrawal. They had taken refuge after April 7th at the Belgian camp set up at the Dom Bosco School, joined by a few expatriates. That morning, French troops had come to the school to evacuate the foreigners, and after they left, the company commander, Captain Lemaire, called Lieutenant Colonel Dewez, his CO, to request permission for his company to consolidate at the airport. He didn’t mention the 2,000 Rwandans his troops were protecting at the school. When Dewez approved the move and the troops pulled out, the Interahamwe moved in, killing all of the Rwandans.”
[Eds. note – the Interahamwe were an extremist Hutu militia]
Captain Luc Lemaire… Of course, Captain Luc Lemaire claims that he was only following orders from above.
Postscript: It was discovered after the genocide and consequent civil war that the Hutus had intentionally targeted the Belgians, accurately predicting that they would flee the country as soon as they took any casualties. The Belgians were the only United Nations military force the Hutu extremists were concerned about and they wanted them out of the way. They achieved their goal.
I am disgusted by the story I just read. You really can’t count on anyone in this world. You can just count on yourself. That is horrendous. Human beings can be the worst species on earth. That is absolutely revolting and disgusting. Ashamed of being represented by such pieces of shit.
May Captain Luc Lemaire rot in hell. How could he abandon the people. fUCK the orders from above, he was at the scene and shoukld just have protected the people, and present the facts later. May all the slain tutsi rest in peace. to the hutu may you continue to live in poverty, HIV, hunger……… what savages
I am a freshman in high school, and we are currently learning about the Rwandan genocide. Before this class, I had never even heard of it. At first I hardly believed it… But as more and more proof came up, I began to go into shock at how something so horrendous and tragic could be brushed aside by the U.N.. I agree with your statement about Captain Luc Lemaire, but how dare you wish for something as horrible as hunger, HIV, and poverty on the Hutus. The Hutus and the Tutsis had a lot of bad blood between them, but neither one of them were the “good guys”. Some articles are bias to the Tutsis because they were the people being targeted. But before the genocide, the Tutsi were often unfair to the Hutu.
The Hutu extremists and militia are the people you should wish upon them HIV and poverty, many of them ended up with HIV anyway. They can rot in hell. But the Hutus as a whole should not because not all of them participated in the killing, such as moderate Hutus, and Hutus with Tutsi spouses.
Pingback: The Truth About Serbia « The Velvet Rocket
I am a high school history teacher. I was teaching history at the time of this massacre. We, as a class, analyzed this event in great detail, the horror of it all not missed, to try to understand better human behavior and how this behavior has minifested itself through history…particularly in the time period between the late 1800’s to the present. A cliche question we examined was the result of the Jewish Holocaust: “could it happen again?” On the basis of what happened in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge and then again in Rwanda, the obvious answer is yes, absolutely. Regardless of how sophisticated a society may be, if the circumstances are right, any group has the capacity to do what was done in Rwanda to the Tutsis.
In my opinion, it is part of human nature to do unspeakable atrocities like this.
Hi Mike –
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner, but I was down in Ethiopia and Somalia where internet access is not quite what it is in the States or Europe. Thank you very much for your comment – always a pleasure to receive quality comments…
I’m afraid that I have to agree with you in that there is an inherent predisposition in humanity for this type of behavior. One only need examine an event like the Stanford prison experiment to see the capacity of virtually anyone to turn into a monster. I’m sure one could debate whether this potential within us is environmental or has an evolutionary/biological explanation, but that this potential is present within us, I have no doubt.
The Holocaust, the Khmer Rouge and Rwanda are really in the big leagues of mass killings, but even in the past few years we have seen examples of ethnic cleansing that if they do not deserve the full “genocide” label, certainly flirt with it – Albanians versus Serbs in Kosovo, everyone versus everyone in Iraq, Christians versus Muslims versus tribal rebels in Sudan, a continuation of the Tutsi versus Hutu conflict in the eastern Congo (with the Lord’s Resistance Army mixed in), etc.
So, it is not as if one can claim that these atrocities are something we have outgrown or that they are a consequence of the Cold War or some other such incomplete explanation.
And given your knowledge of history, I obviously do not need to support your argument with the countless examples from our past.
Your observation about the frequency and scale of mass killings since the late 1800s was intriguing to me. One possible explanation is that population density and technology have made the killing easier and the mass media has made us more aware of the killing? For example: Imagine if the various campaigns of the Crusades had been televised and had involved the modern technology of war alongside the population densities of that region of the world present today.
You are correct! Genocide can and will happen again. I respect your education and insight Mike. I attempted to watch “hotel Rawanda” on our multi-cultural broadcast TV station in Australia, and just couldn’t digest it! Even if I, myself had come out of Sri Lanka, that went through a bloody civil war costing thousands of lives! Life is really not sacrosanct, is it
Pingback: The Rwandan Genocide and École Technique Officielle: Indifference? Negligence? Or Something Else? « The Velvet Rocket
Novels and movies are not reliable sources of information and often desserve history. Furthermore, generals – guys who usually break other men – are good liars and are inclined to do so as soon as their behavior is questioned.
Please try to inform adequately before crucifying powerless subordinates !
If you read the KIBAT: Chronicle of April 6th to April 19, which is was essentially the Battalion Log for the Belgian forces, Lemaire made it clear how many refugees he had at the ETO. That does not excuse his actions or lack of actions, but it calls in to question whether Dallaire actually knew or whether there was communication between Dallaire and Marchal (the Belgian commander).
wow that’s so harsh, I don’t know what was running through their minds but people are people no matter what color, what culture, what language they speak, or where they come from. Really what happened in the genocide was just horrible, may their poor souls R.est I.n P.eace.
Hey guys, do you think that Captain Luc Lemaire took the decision in his own? No, certainly no. Remember, it was just a captain, he didn’t has to talk, he just has to do what Belgian’s governement and ministers said to him. I think he didn’t want it and tried certainly with the others belgian to do the best, but it’s difficult to choice what’s the best, and impossible to do things you want if the state is opposed to.
All foreigners who went there in 1994 tried to do the best against the horror of the genocide but humans couldn’t do the impossible: stop something like that in his own.
Please stop to charge innocents. Thanks.
You can see the documentary here http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7ntcg_2-we-were-cowards-nous-avons-ete-de_news starting at around 8:10. It shows interviews with Rwandans at the school as well as the Belgian troops